---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <
motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date:
Wed, 31 Jan 2018 14:55:16 -0400
Subject: ATTN MP Serge Cormier and Charles
Leblanc the lawyer and
Charles Leblanc the "Evil Blogger" RE The petition to
the House of
Commons launched Monday night by Nicolas Vienneau
To:
"Serge.Cormier" <
Serge.Cormier@parl.gc.ca>,
Serge.Cormier.c1@parl.gc.ca,
Serge.Cormier.c2@parl.gc.ca,
"serge.rousselle"
<
serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>,
"Larry.Tremblay"
<
Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc:
David Amos <
david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
,
crl@nbnet.nb.ca,
oldmaison
<
oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
andre <
andre@jafaust.com>,
"Bobbi-Jean.MacKinnon"
<
Bobbi-Jean.MacKinnon@cbc.ca>
I
just called both of your offices again Correct Serge Cormier?
Would you
care to guess whose brother brught Crimestoppers to New Brunswick?
Serge
Cormier MP
House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario
Canada K1A
0A6
Telephone: 613-992-2165
Constituency Office
270 Douglas
Ave
Suite 305
Bathurst, New Brunswick
E2A 1M9
Telephone:
506-350-5398
http://chambregrandcaraquet.com/membershipCharles
R. LeBlanc C.P. Inc.
108A boul. St-Pierre Ouest, Caraquet NB. E1W
1B6
Téléphone : (506) 727-4002
Télécopieur : (506) 727-7417
Courriel :
crl@nbnet.nb.cahttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4DebYo_iRu0Nicolas
Vienneau and Blogger chat about Michel Vienneau who got killed
by the
Bathurst Police.
134 views
Charles Leblanc
Published on Jan 12,
2018
Charles Leblanc
145 Westmorland St Apt.1
Fredericton NB E3B
3L4
(506) 206-0840
---------- Original message ----------
From:
Serge.Cormier@parl.gc.caDate:
Wed, 27 Dec 2017 12:22:20 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : Methinks the
big political story this
year should be CBC FAILING ITS MANDATE AGAIN BUT
BIGTIME THIS TIME
N'esy Pas Premier Gallant?
To:
motomaniac333@gmail.comVeuillez
noter que le bureau est présentement fermé pour le temps des
fêtes. Nous
serons de retour le 8 janvier, 2018.
Merci.
******************************
******************************
****************
Please
note that our office is currently closed for the holidays. We
will be back in
the office January 8, 2018. Thank you.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/michel-vienneau-crimestoppers-petition-1.4510020Family
of businessman killed by Bathurst police asks Ottawa to release
secret
details about case
Petition by Michel Vienneau's family seeks name of tipster
who
provided false information to Crime Stoppers
By Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon,
Gabrielle Fahmy, CBC News Posted: Jan 30,
2018 12:53 PM AT
More than
three years after Michel Vienneau was shot and killed by
Bathurst police, the
family of the 51-year-old Tracadie businessman
will petition Ottawa to
release details about the shooting — including
the identity of the person
whose false tip to Crime Stoppers led to
the attempted arrest of
Vienneau.
The petition to the House of Commons, launched Monday night by
the
victim's brother Nicolas Vienneau, is being sponsored
by
Acadie-Bathurst MP Serge Cormier.
Michel Vienneau was shot and
killed in a Via Rail parking lot on Jan.
12, 2015, when police attempted to
arrest him based on a tip he was
carrying "a load of drugs" back with him
from Montreal.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/publication-ban-lifted-michel-vienneau-1.4410989Why
did a judge drop charges against 2 Bathurst officers who killed an
innocent
man?
Lifting of publication ban allows a closer look at why a judge
thought
Bathurst officers did nothing illegal
By Gabrielle Fahmy, CBC News
Posted: Nov 21, 2017 6:00 AM AT
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/michel-vienneau-court-documents-1.3315844Lawyers
continue fight for documents in Michel Vienneau case
Court of Queen's Bench
Justice Larry Landry reserves decision in
motion connected to civil
suit
CBC News Posted: Nov 12, 2015 12:59 PM AT
"Vienneau's common-law
partner, Annick Basque, and her lawyer, Charles
Leblanc, made a motion to
request that police and government submit
documents to assist in their
lawsuit against the City of Bathurst."
"Catherine McIntyre, representing
the Attorney General of Canada on
behalf of the RCMP replied the
investigation into the incident is
ongoing, and criminal charges may still
be laid."
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/annick-basque-second-lawsuit-1.3339685Annick
Basque files second lawsuit against City of Bathurst
Michel Vienneau's widow
seeks damages for her arrest when Vienneau was
shot and killed by
police
By Bridget Yard, CBC News Posted: Nov 27, 2015 11:56 AM
AT
"Basque describes being forcibly removed from the vehicle
and
handcuffed shortly after Vienneau was killed.
Her cell phone was
seized and she was told that she was under arrest
for possession of illegal
drugs with intent to traffic, then she was
brought to the Bathurst
detachment.
Basque says in her statement of claim that there is no
evidence to
support her arrest. She says no drugs were found in her or
Vienneau's
possession, or in their vehicle, and they had not committed
any
criminal acts.
Basque's claims are made in court documents and
have not been proven in court.
At a news conference announcing the
manslaughter charges against two
police officers, an RCMP officer told
reporters the review of the
Bathurst police investigation by Nova Scotia RCMP
did not find that
Michel Vienneau had committed any criminal acts.
The
City of Bathurst has yet to file a statement of defence."
Judge rules
Michel Vienneau's common-law partner be provided with
financial & medical
records
Wednesday, November 2nd 2016 - 5:49 am
"A judge has ruled that
the common-law partner of a Tracadie man shot
and killed by Bathurst police
in January of 2015 is entitled to his
personal and corporate tax reports and
medical records.
The lawyer for Annick Basque argued the documents were
pertinent to
her civil suite against the city of Bathurst relating to
Michel
Vienneau's death.
Vienneau's family had refused access to the
documents, saying Basque
was neither Vienneau's wife or common-law
partner."
I am about to make an application to the Supreme Court
because of
this wicked decision. Please enjoy
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.htmlSunday,
19 November 2017
Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision
And Publishes
It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter
Before
The Supreme Court
https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.doFederal
Court of Appeal Decisions
Amos v. Canada
Court (s)
Database
Federal Court of Appeal
Decisions
Date
2017-10-30
Neutral citation
2017 FCA
213
File numbers
A-48-16
Date: 20171030
Docket:
A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR
J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on
the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE
QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
Heard at
Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa,
Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
THE
COURT
Date: 20171030
Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA
213
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON
J.A.
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the
cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE
QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
REASONS
FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
I. Introduction
[1]
On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
filed a
53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
against Her Majesty
the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
in damages and a public
apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
Premiers for being illegally
barred from accessing parliamentary
properties and seeks a declaration from
the Minister of Public Safety
that the Canadian Government will no longer
allow the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass
him and his clan
(Claim at para. 96).
[2] On November
12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
motion brought by the Crown, a
prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its
entirety, without leave to
amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious
that the Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally
vexatious,
and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment
(the
Prothontary’s Order).
[3] On January 25, 2016
(2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a
judge of the Federal
Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck
all of Mr.
Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for
damages
for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature
in
2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
[4] Mr. Amos
appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
Federal Court Judgment. Further to
the issuance of a Notice of Status
Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for
delay on December 19, 2016.
As such, the only matter before this Court is the
Crown’s
cross-appeal.
II. Preliminary
Matter
[5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law
in
relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
6,
2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
the
judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
This was the
first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
had a conflict of
interest in a document that was filed with this
Court. In his notice of
appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
several judges but did not name
those judges.
[6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not
have to
identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because
he
had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
with
the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
Court of
Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
the Federal
Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
subsections 5(4)
and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
c. F-7:
5(4)
Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
office, a judge
of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
jurisdiction, power and
authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
Appeal.
[…]
5(4) Les
juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
d’appel fédérale et
ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
les juges de la Cour d’appel
fédérale.
[…]
5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by
virtue of
that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all
the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal
Court.
5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges
de la
Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
les
juges de la Cour fédérale.
[7] However, these
subsections only provide that the
judges of the Federal Court are also judges
of this Court (and vice
versa). It does not mean that there is only one
court. If the Federal
Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no
need for this
section.
[8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal
Courts Act provide that:
3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called
the Federal Court
— Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal
Court of
Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It
is
continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in
and
for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and
as
a superior court of record having civil and criminal
jurisdiction.
3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la
Cour d’appel
fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale »
en
français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est
maintenue
à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté
du
Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
continue
d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
matière civile et
pénale.
4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal
Court
— Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court”
in
English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
additional
court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
the better
administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
court of record having
civil and criminal jurisdiction.
4 La section de la Cour fédérale du
Canada, appelée la Section de
première instance de la Cour fédérale, est
maintenue et dénommée «
Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en
anglais. Elle est
maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit,
d’equity et
d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du
droit
canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives
ayant
compétence en matière civile et pénale.
[9]
Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
two separate courts – this
Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
(section 4). If, as Mr. Amos
suggests, documents filed in the Federal
Court were automatically also filed
in this Court, then there would no
need for the parties to prepare and file
appeal books as required by
Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules,
SOR/98-106 in relation
to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court.
The requirement to
file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an
appeal from a
decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only
documents
that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of
that
appeal book.
[10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact
and law filed on
March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court,
in which
Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have
a
conflict in any matter related to him.
[11] On April
3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
before the Federal Court
seeking an order “affirming or denying the
conflict of interest he has” with
a number of judges of the Federal
Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued
a direction noting that if
Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to
judges of the Federal
Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the
Federal Court.
Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of
this
cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before
this
Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal
Court
will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion
brought
before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed
in
relation to that motion are not part of the record of this
Court.
[12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos
alleged that
the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest
and
submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of
a
conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was
also
afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the
conflict
that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in
his
view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages
of
documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized
the
documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the
particular
judge and then, immediately following that biography, by
including
copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim
that
such judge had a conflict.
[13] The nature of the
alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
that before he was appointed as a Judge
of the Tax Court of Canada in
2006, he was a partner with the law firm
Patterson Law, and before
that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos
submitted that he
had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and
Patterson Law and
therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was
a partner
of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb
was
personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which
Mr.
Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that
he
was a member of such firm.
[14] During his oral
submissions at the hearing of his
appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged
conflict for Justice Webb,
focused on dealings between himself and a
particular lawyer at
Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted
by Mr. Amos at
the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with
this
particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with
this
lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings
were
after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the
Tax
Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
[15] The
documents that he submitted in relation to the
alleged conflict for Justice
Webb largely relate to dealings between
Byron Prior and the St. John’s
Newfoundland and Labrador office of
Patterson Palmer, which is not in the
same province where Justice Webb
practiced law. The only document that
indicates any dealing between
Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an
affidavit of Stephen May
who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of
Patterson Palmer. The
affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a
number of e-mails
that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also
included a
letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is
John
Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of
Patterson
Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed
to
“John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen
Street,
Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to
a
possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
[16] Mr. Amos’
position is that simply because Justice Webb
was a lawyer with Patterson
Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
Indian Band v. Her Majesty the
Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted
that disqualification of a
judge is to be determined based on whether there
is a reasonable
apprehension of bias:
60 In Canadian law, one
standard has now emerged as the
criterion for disqualification. The
criterion, as expressed by de
Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and
Liberty v. National Energy
Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716],
at p. 394, is the
reasonable apprehension of bias:
… the apprehension of
bias must be a reasonable one, held by
reasonable and right minded persons,
applying themselves to the
question and obtaining thereon the required
information. In the words
of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an
informed person,
viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and
having thought
the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more
likely
than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously
or
unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
[17] The issue
to be determined is whether an informed
person, viewing the matter
realistically and practically, and having
thought the matter through, would
conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
give rise to a reasonable apprehension of
bias. As this Court has
previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption
that judges will
administer justice impartially” and this presumption will
not be
rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins
v.
Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins].
See
also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151
D.L.R.
(4th) 193).
[18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando
Drugs Ltd. v.
Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the
Supreme
Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed
the
particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing
a
case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
involved
in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
Court of Appeal
determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
judge had no
involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
lawyer. The Ontario
Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
determining whether a judge
is disqualified are different from the
rules to determine whether a lawyer
has a conflict:
27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary
to a
finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case
over
which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no
involvement,
as here, it cannot be said that the judge is
disqualified.
28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr.
Patterson been
asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his
appointment to
the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him
from
taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of
the
defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a
trial
judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by
the
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v.
Bayfield
Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58,
that
there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a
judge
and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
29
It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
inconsistency in
application of rules can be explained by the
different contexts and in
particular, the strong presumption of
judicial impartiality that applies in
the context of disqualification
of a judge. There is no such presumption in
cases of allegations of
conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a
firm's previous
involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by
Sopinka J.
in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249
(S.C.C.),
for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a
disqualifying
interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a
conclusory
statement from the lawyer that he or she had no
confidential
information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is
the
opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial
judge.
His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case
and
had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face
value
unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para.
19.
30 That brings me then to consider the particular
circumstances
of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find
a
disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there
are
two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not
to
recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties
accept,
that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm
and
that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage
of
time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
To us, one
significant factor stands out, and must inform
the perspective of the
reasonable person assessing the impact of this
involvement on Binnie J.'s
impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
the passage of time. Most
arguments for disqualification rest on
circumstances that are either
contemporaneous to the decision-making,
or that occurred within a short time
prior to the decision-making.
31 There are other factors that inform
the issue. The Wilson
Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by
the time of
trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J.
had
been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship
with
his former firm for a considerable period of time.
32
In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
realistically would
conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
and impartially with this
case. I take this view principally because
of the long passage of time and
the trial judge's lack of involvement
in or knowledge of the case when the
Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
In these circumstances it cannot be
reasonably contended that the
trial judge could not remain impartial in the
case. The mere fact that
his name appears on the letterhead of some
correspondence from over a
decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to
believe that he would
either consciously or unconsciously favour his former
firm's former
client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would
throw
off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour
a
client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six
years
earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case
involving
events from over a decade ago.
(emphasis added)
[19]
Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
involving Mr. Amos while
he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos
suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
clear during the hearing of this matter
that the only reason for the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he
was a member of
Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough
for
Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos
with
Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would
have
had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when
he
was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of
any
involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos
had
with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself
is
sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
Justice
Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
also result in
the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
Webb hearing this
appeal.
[20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man.
R.
(2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was
no
reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member
of
the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no
involvement
with the accused while he was a lawyer with that
firm.
[21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000]
4
F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be
a
reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was
a
lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
was
before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
Justice Webb
did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
Amos while he was a
lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
[22] Mr. Amos
also included with his submissions a CD. He
stated in his affidavit dated
June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
of an American police surveillance
wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
He has also indicated that he has “provided
a true copy of the CD
entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law
enforcement authorities
and not one of the police forces or officers of the
court are willing
to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an
“American
police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American
law
enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests,
a
conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
[23]
As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
apprehension of bias
for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
to recuse
himself.
[24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past
professional
experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in
deciding
the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice
Near
confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in
the
Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
[25]
Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
Amos’ allegations
against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
that she is incapable of
hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
a letter to Brian Mulroney and
Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney
were partners in the law firm
Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question,
which is rude and angry,
begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards”
and “Re: me suing
you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that
the letter
was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by
Mr.
Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no
reason
for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question
does
not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
III.
Issue
[26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as
follows: Did the
Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking
the Claim
in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that
Mr.
Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New
Brunswick
legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of
action?
IV. Analysis
A. Standard of
Review
[27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside
the
Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review
to
be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and
decisions
made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in
Hospira
Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA
215,
402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel
of
this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with
that
articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R.
235
[Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the
Federal
Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by
a
prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of
the
case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal
if
the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and
overriding
error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact
and
law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere
with
a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary
order
if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error
in
determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
law
(Hospira at paras. 82-83).
[28] In the case at bar, the
Judge substituted his own
assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the
Prothonotary. This Court
must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine
whether the Judge
erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in
choosing to
interfere.
B. Did the Judge err in
interfering with the
Prothonotary’s Order?
[29] The
Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
paragraphs from the Crown’s
submissions as the basis for striking the
Claim in its entirety without leave
to amend:
17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the
Plaintiff
addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but
four
of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in
2006
in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction
of
the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right
of
the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
or
provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
does not
give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
(…)
21.
The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
provide no
details as to the individuals involved or the location of
the alleged
incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
Defendant to respond. As a
result, it is difficult or impossible to
determine the causes of action the
Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
A generous reading of the Statement of
Claim allows the Defendant to
only speculate as to the true and/or intended
cause of action. At
best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized
as: he
suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
[footnotes
omitted].
[30] The Judge determined that he could not
strike the Claim
on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The
Judge noted
that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on
the
liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the
actors
who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in
2004
included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In
considering
the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge
identified
paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as
it
identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting
as
Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment
at
para. 27).
[31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event
could support a
cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office
and
identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v.
Canada,
2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
[13] As in both the
cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v
Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
determine whether the plaintiffs’
statement of claim pleads each
element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in
public office:
a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and
unlawful
conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
b) The
public officer must have been aware both that his or her
conduct was unlawful
and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
c) There must be an
element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
officer and knowledge of
harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
public officer acted in bad
faith or dishonestly.
Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
(Federal
Court Judgment at para. 28).
[32] The Judge determined that Mr.
Amos disclosed sufficient
material facts to meet the elements of the tort of
misfeasance in
public office because the actors, who barred him from the
New
Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so
for
“political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
[33]
This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
in Merchant
Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
D.L.R (4th) 301 is
particularly apt:
…When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not
enough to
assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately
or
negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did
steal”.
“The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is
called
upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making
bald,
conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an
abuse
of process…
To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in
public office
requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in
carrying
out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the
public
officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or
her
office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations
is
mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization
of
allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
a
person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
(at paras. 34-35, citations
omitted).
[34] Applying the Housen standard of review to
the
Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge
interfered
absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
[35]
The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
disclosed no reasonable
claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
basis of jurisdictional concerns
and the absence of material facts to
ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14
of the Claim, which addresses
the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to
how the RCMP officer
engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that
his or her
conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in
bad
faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred
from
the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious
reasons,
these allegations are not particularized and are directed
against
non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the
Legislative
Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As
such,
the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the
RCMP
barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable
of
supporting a cause of action.
[36] In our view, the Claim
is made up entirely of bare
allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it
discloses no
reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the
Federal
Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside
the
Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further,
we
find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
The
deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
amendment
could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
V.
Conclusion
[37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the
Crown’s
cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court
Judgment,
dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order,
dated
November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its
entirety
without leave to amend.
"Wyman W. Webb"
J.A.
"David G.
Near"
J.A.
"Mary J.L. Gleason"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF
APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
A CROSS-APPEAL FROM
AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET
NUMBER T-1557-15.
DOCKET:
A-48-16
STYLE OF
CAUSE:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
PLACE
OF HEARING:
Fredericton,
New Brunswick
DATE OF
HEARING:
May 24, 2017
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
BY:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
DATED:
October
30, 2017
APPEARANCES:
David Raymond
Amos
For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
(on his own
behalf)
Jan Jensen
For The Respondent / appELLANT ON
CROSS-APPEAL
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Nathalie G. Drouin
Deputy
Attorney General of Canada
For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON
CROSS-APPEAL
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/12/attn-simon-fish-of-bmo-and-robert.htmlThursday,
21 December 2017
Attn Simon Fish of the BMO and Robert Kennedy of Dentons
I just called
from 902 800 0369 Play dumb all you wish The BMO has had my
documents
for years
https://www.scribd.com/document/367699089/The-Scotia-Bank-and-The-Bank-of-Montrealhttps://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/integrity-yea-rightWhile
I was publishing this in my blog the lawyer Bobby Baby Kennedy called
back
from (416) 846-6598 and played as dumb. Hell he even claimed that he
did not
know who Frank McKenna was No partner even a lowly collection
dude within
Dentons is allowed to be THAT stupid.
> ---------- Forwarded
message ----------
> From: David Amos
motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity
Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To:
coi@gnb.ca> Cc:
david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office
again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first
time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to
the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not
after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal
Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only
document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal
Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is
the docket in Federal Court
>
>
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T>
>
These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>
> Dec
14th
https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug>
>
January 11th, 2016
https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015>
>
April 3rd, 2017
>
>
https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing>
>
>
This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
>
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All>
>
>
The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
>
https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown>
>
>
This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date:
20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New
Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr.
Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND
AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY
THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
>
(Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>
December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way
of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an
Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck
the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of
the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated
September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past
President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association,
and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of
the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
> he
stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that
you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm
including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank
McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of
mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an
intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his
Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential
parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally,
include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The
Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and
now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former
member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services,
the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force,
Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues
on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and
Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the
Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances,
given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past
and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential
parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable
apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de
Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et
al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the
applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances,
although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it
appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL,
THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another
date for the hearing of the motion. There
> is no order as to
costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
>
Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>
already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to
your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
> I
noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>
Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom
of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
> lawsuit now
before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the
lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
>
>
> ----------
Original message ----------
> From:
justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My
complaint against the CROWN in
> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter
MacKay If you planning to
> submit a motion for a publication ban on my
complaint trust that you
> dudes are way past too late
> To:
david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>
lalanthier@hotmail.com>
>
Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>
tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca>
>
Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>
lalanthier@hotmail.com>
>
To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>
tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca>
>
Thank you,
>
> Merci ,
>
>
>
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html>
>
>
83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>
in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>
allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five
years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This
Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
>
December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October
3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes
And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>
> Canada’s and Canadians free
ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s
skirts.
>
> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister
Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the
second campaign
> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against
or contrary to
> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers
that were
> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation.
There were
> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of
the dearth
> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces
for
> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last
minute”
> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its
mind.
> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would
not
> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy
a
> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins
to
> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it
was
> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq.
But
> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister
Chretien’s
> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean
Chretien’s
> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was
heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI
Battle
> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the
Panjway
> campaign of 2006.
>
> What Justin Trudeau and the
Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean
Chretien committed, and deployed the
> Canadian army to Canada’s longest
“war” without the advice, consent,
> support, or vote of the Canadian
Parliament.
>
> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant,
uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand
is the deployment of
> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is
known by planners
> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the
same as a
> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war”
make.
>
> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan
cousins have
> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian
nation to war.
> That has been recently clearly articulated to the
Canadian public by
> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What
Parliament can do is
> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a
“vote of
> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien
Government
> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in
this
> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding
a
> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>
>
President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> attacks
in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
> Afghanistan
was the source of logistical support, command and control,
> and training
for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> initial defeat,
and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>
> P.S.
Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
> the
latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
> had my
files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> Ask his
friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>
>
Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy,
Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"
MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca>
To:
motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
>
January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David
Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge
receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren
McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations
made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to
Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in
Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B.
Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
>
>
Warren McBeath
warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From:
"Warren McBeath"
warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
To:
kilgoursite@ca.inter.net,
MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>
nada.sarkis@gnb.ca,
wally.stiles@gnb.ca,
dwatch@web.net,
>
motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
CC:
ottawa@chuckstrahl.com,
riding@chuckstrahl.com,
John.Foran@gnb.ca,
>
Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev
BUSSON"
bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>
"Paul Dube"
PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten
me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>
> Dear Mr.
Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on
days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest
assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your
concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier
Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs
do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are
referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can
provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise
in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be
done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government,
false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is
clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in
Canada
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of
Detachment
> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was
indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December
23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
>
Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia
RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506)
387-4622
> E-mail
warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>
>
>
Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>
Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B
5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
>
e-mail:coi@gnb.ca>
>
>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos
motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:35 AM
> Subject: RE My complaint against the
CROWN in Federal Court Attn David
> Hansen and Peter MacKay If you
planning to submit a motion for a
> publication ban on my complaint trust
that you dudes are way past too late
> To:
David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca,
peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca>
peacock.kurt@telegraphjournal.com,
mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com,
>
david.akin@sunmedia.ca,
robert.frater@justice.gc.ca,
paul.riley@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca,
>
greg@gregdelbigio.com,
joyce.dewitt-vanoosten@gov.bc.ca,
>
joan.barrett@ontario.ca,
jean-vincent.lacroix@gouv.qc.ca,
>
peter.rogers@mcinnescooper.com,
mfeder@mccarthy.ca,
mjamal@osler.com>
Cc:
david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
gopublic@cbc.ca,
>
Whistleblower@ctv.ca>
>
https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/14439/index.do>
>
http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/WebDocuments-DocumentsWeb/35072/FM030_Respondent_Attorney-General-of-Canada-on-Behalf-of-the-United-States-of-America.pdf>
>
http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html>
>
I repeat what the Hell do I do with the Yankee wiretapes taps sell
> them
on Ebay or listen to them and argue them with you dudes in
> Feferal
Court?
>
> Petey Baby loses all parliamentary privelges in less than
a month but
> he still supposed to be an ethical officer of the Court
CORRECT?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902
800 0369
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>
From: David Amos
motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:10:14 -0400
> Subject: Yo Mr Bauer say hey to
your client Obama and his buddies in
> the USDOJ for me will ya?
>
To:
RBauer@perkinscoie.com,
sshimshak@paulweiss.com,
>
cspada@lswlaw.com,
msmith@svlaw.com,
bginsberg@pattonboggs.com,
>
gregory.craig@skadden.com,
pm@pm.gc.ca,
bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>
bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net,
MulcaT@parl.gc.ca,
leader@greenparty.ca>
Cc:
alevine@cooley.com,
david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
>
michael.rothfeld@wsj.com,
remery@ecbalaw.com>
>
QSLS Politics
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 29,419
>
Domain Name
usdoj.gov ? (U.S. Government)
> IP
Address 149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice)
> ISP US Dept of Justice
>
Location Continent : North America
> Country : United States
(Facts)
> State : District of Columbia
> City : Washington
>
Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
>
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
>
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
> CLR
2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2;
>
DI60SP1001)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x
768
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Nov 17 2012 6:33:08
pm
> Last Page View Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
> Visit Length 0
seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL
http://www.google.co...
wwWJrm94lCEqRmovPXJg
>
Search Engine
google.com> Search Words david amos bernie
madoff
> Visit Entry Page
http://qslspolitics....-wendy-
olsen-on.html
> Visit
Exit Page
http://qslspolitics....-wendy-
olsen-on.html
> Out
Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time Nov 17 2012 12:33:08
pm
> Visit Number 29,419
>
>
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html>
>
>
Could ya tell I am investigating your pension plan bigtime? Its
> because
no member of the RCMP I have ever encountered has earned it
yet
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>
From: David Amos
motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:36:04 -0400
> Subject: This is a brief as I can
make my concerns Randy
> To:
randyedmunds@gov.nl.ca>
Cc:
david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
In a nutshell my concerns about the actions of the Investment Industry
>
affect the interests of every person in every district of every
> country
not just the USA and Canada. I was offering to help you with
> Emera
because my work with them and Danny Williams is well known and
> some of
it is over eight years old and in the PUBLIC Record.
>
> All you
have to do is stand in the Legislature and ask the MInister of
> Justice
why I have been invited to sue Newfoundland by the
>
Conservatives
>
>
> Obviously I am the guy the USDOJ and the
SEC would not name who is the
> link to Madoff and Putnam
Investments
>
> Here is why
>
>
http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=90f8e691-9065-4f8c-a465-72722b47e7f2>
>
Notice the transcripts and webcasts of the hearing of the US Senate
>
Banking Commitee are still missing? Mr Emory should at least notice
>
Eliot Spitzer and the Dates around November 20th, 2003 in the
> following
file
>
>
http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf>
>
http://occupywallst.org/users/DavidRaymondAmos/>
>
>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Hansen, David"
David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 19:28:44 +0000
> Subject: RE: I just called again Mr
Hansen
> To: David Amos
motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
Hello Mr. Amos,
>
> I manage the Justice Canada civil litigation
section in the Atlantic
> region. We are only responsible for litigating
existing civil
> litigation files in which the Attorney General of Canada
is a named
> defendant or plaintiff. If you are a plaintiff or defendant
in an
> existing civil litigation matter in the Atlantic region in
which
> Attorney General of Canada is a named defendant or plaintiff
please
> provide the court file number, the names of the parties in the
action
> and your question. I am not the appropriate contact for
other
> matters.
>
> Thanks
>
> David A.
Hansen
> Regional Director | Directeur régional
> General Counsel
|Avocat général
> Civil Litigation and Advisory | Contentieux des affaires
civiles et
> services de consultation
> Department of Justice |
Ministère de la Justice
> Suite 1400 – Duke Tower | Pièce 1400 – Tour
Duke
> 5251 Duke Street | 5251 rue Duke
> Halifax, Nova Scotia |
Halifax, Nouvelle- Écosse
> B3J 1P3
>
david.hansen@justice.gc.ca>
Telephone | Téléphone (902) 426-3261 / Facsimile | Télécopieur (902)
>
426-2329
> This e-mail is confidential and may be protected by
solicitor-client
> privilege. Unauthorized distribution or disclosure is
prohibited. If
> you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us
and delete
> this entire e-mail.
> Before printing think about the
Environment
> Thinking Green, please do not print this e-mail unless
necessary.
> Pensez vert, svp imprimez que si
nécessaire.
>
>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message
----------
>> From: David Amos
motomaniac333@gmail.com>>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:23:24 -0300
>> Subject: ATTN FBI Special
Agent Richard Deslauriers Have you talked to
>> your buddies Fred
Wyshak and Brian Kelly about the wiretap tapes YET?
>> To:
boston@ic.fbi.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
>>
bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>
Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov,
us.marshals@usdoj.gov,
Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov,
>>
jcarney@carneybassil.com,
bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>>
Cc:
david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
birgittaj@althingi.is,
>>
shmurphy@globe.com,
redicecreations@gmail.com>>
>>
FBI Boston
>> One Center Plaza
>> Suite 600
>>
Boston, MA 02108
>> Phone: (617) 742-5533
>> Fax: (617)
223-6327
>> E-mail:
Boston@ic.fbi.gov>>
>>
Hours
>> Although we operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, our
normal
>> "walk-in" business hours are from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.,
Monday
>> through Friday. If you need to speak with a FBI
representative at any
>> time other than during normal business hours,
please telephone our
>> office at (617)
742-5533.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message
----------
>> From: David Amos
motomaniac333@gmail.com>>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300
>> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and
Brian Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is
>> finally underway now
correct? What the hell do I do with the wiretap
>> tapes Sell them on
Ebay?
>> To:
Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov,
us.marshals@usdoj.gov,
>>
Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov,
jcarney@carneybassil.com,
>>
bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net,
wolfheartlodge@live.com,
shmurphy@globe.com,
>>
jonathan.albano@bingham.com,
mvalencia@globe.com>>
Cc:
david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>>
PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov,
rounappletree@aol.com>>
>>
http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/06/05/james-whitey-bulger-jury-selection-process-enters-second-day/KjS80ofyMMM5IkByK74bkK/story.html>>
>>
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html>>
>>
As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
ask
>> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING
SOMETHING????
>>
>>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY>>
>>
What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>
USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>
cards?
>>
>>
http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc>>
>>
http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly2006>>
>>
http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html>>
>>
http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139>>
>>
http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143>>
>>
FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>
United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224
Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC
20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have
been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named,
David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>
raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented
to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I
believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this
previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A.
Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct
facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email:
bbachrach@bowditch.com>>
>>
----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Amos"
david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>>
To: "Rob Talach"
rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM
>> Subject: Re: Attn Robert
Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing
>> the Catholic Church
Trust that Bastarache knows why
>>
>> The date stamp on about
page 134 of this old file of mine should mean
>> a lot to
you
>>
>>
http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf>>
>>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos
motomaniac333@gmail.com>>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:37:08 -0400
>> Subject: To Hell with the
KILLER COP Gilles Moreau What say you NOW
>> Bernadine
Chapman??
>> To:
Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
phil.giles@statcan.ca,
>>
maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca,
Jennifer.Nixon@ps-sp.gc.ca,
>>
bartman.heidi@psic-ispc.gc.ca,
Yves.J.Marineau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>
david.paradiso@erc-cee.gc.ca,
desaulniea@smtp.gc.ca,
>>
denise.brennan@tbs-sct.gc.ca,
anne.murtha@vac-acc.gc.ca,
>>
webo@xplornet.com,
julie.dickson@osfi-bsif.gc.ca,
>>
rod.giles@osfi-bsif.gc.ca,
flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca,
toewsv1@parl.gc.ca,
>>
Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca,
Clemet1@parl.gc.ca,
maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca,
>>
oig@sec.gov,
whistleblower@finra.org,
whistle@fsa.gov.uk,
>>
david@fairwhistleblower.ca>>
Cc:
j.kroes@interpol.int,
david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
>>
bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca,
>>
Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>>
Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca,
>>
ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>
>>
http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/nb/news-nouvelles/media-medias-eng.htm>>
>>
http://nb.rcmpvet.ca/Newsletters/VetsReview/nlnov06.pdf>>
>>
From: Gilles Moreau
Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:03:22 -0500
>> Subject: Re: Lets ee if the
really nasty Newfy Lawyer Danny Boy
>> Millions will explain this email
to you or your boss Vic Toews EH
>> Constable Peddle???
>> To:
David Amos
motomaniac333@gmail.com>>
>>
Please cease and desist from using my name in your
emails.
>>
>> Gilles Moreau, Chief Superintendent, CHRP and
ACC
>> Director General
>> HR Transformation
>> 73
Leikin Drive, M5-2-502
>> Ottawa, Ontario K1A
0R2
>>
>> Tel 613-843-6039
>> Cel
613-818-6947
>>
>> Gilles Moreau, surintendant principal, CRHA
et ACC
>> Directeur général de la Transformation des ressources
humaines
>> 73 Leikin, pièce M5-2-502
>> Ottawa, ON K1A
0R2
>>
>> tél 613-843-6039
>> cel
613-818-6947
>>
gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>>
----------
Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <
motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date:
Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:41:43 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Re My calls about Federal Court
File # T-1557-15 The
Commionaires, the Canadian Forces, the RCMP and other
police forces
etc are mentioned thoughout my complaint Paragraph 20 is just
one
example
To:
Karen.Ludwig.c2@parl.gc.ca,
"Wayne.Long.c1"
<
Wayne.Long.c1@parl.gc.ca>,
Serge.Cormier.c1@parl.gc.ca,
Rene.Arseneault.c1@parl.gc.ca,
Pat.Finnigan.c1e@parl.gc.caCc:
David Amos <
david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
----------
Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <
motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date:
Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:12:21 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Re My calls about Federal Court
File # T-1557-15 The
Commionaires, the Canadian Forces, the RCMP and other
police forces
etc are mentioned thoughout my complaint Paragraph 20 is just
one
example
To:
hedy.fry.a1@parl.gc.ca,
"linda.duncan.a1"
<
linda.duncan.a1@parl.gc.ca>,
"Amarjeet.Sohi.a1"
<
Amarjeet.Sohi.a1@parl.gc.ca>,
"don.iveson" <
don.iveson@edmonton.ca>,
Alaina.Lockhart.a1@parl.gc.caCc:
David Amos <
david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
,
patrick_doran1
<
patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>,
themayor <
themayor@calgary.ca>,
pol7163
<
pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>,
Alaina.Lockhart.c1@parl.gc.cahttps://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/status/703260435806552064Dr.
Hedy Fry @HedyFry 6 hours ago
Lib gvt repeals sections of #CPC Bill C24
which created 2 tier
citizens.Now dual citizens will b treated equally
again
#acitizenisacitizen
4 retweets 6 likes
David Raymond Amos
@DavidRayAmos
Hey @HedyFry & @CBCPolitics Re Secs 300 & 319 of CC Why
won't
@edmontonpolice or @RCMPAlberta arrest Barry Winters?
http://eateshite.blogspot.ca/2016/02/a-black-bimbo-politician-wants-to.html…
1:48
PM - 26 Feb 2016
http://eateshite.blogspot.ca/2016/02/a-black-bimbo-politician-wants-to.html----------
Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <
motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date:
Fri, 26 Feb 2016 12:02:58 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Re My calls about Federal Court
File # T-1557-15 The
Commionaires, the Canadian Forces, the RCMP and other
police forces
etc are mentioned thoughout my complaint Paragraph 20 is just
one
example
To:
Bill.Blair.a1@parl.gc.ca,
info <
info@fja-cmf.gc.ca>,
louis.plamondon.a1@parl.gc.ca,
steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca,
Daniel.Blaikie.a1@parl.gc.ca,
danadurnford <
danadurnford@hotmail.com>,
Rachel.Blaney.a1@parl.gc.ca,
Kim Seguin <
geoff.regan@parl.gc.ca>,
"geoff.regan.a1"
<
geoff.regan.a1@parl.gc.ca>,
Harjit.Sajjan.a1@parl.gc.ca,
andrew.scheer.a1@parl.gc.ca,
Ezra
, "ht.lacroix" <ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>
Cc:
David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
sunrayzulu
<sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>,
"Paul.Lynch" <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>,
gopublic
<gopublic@cbc.ca>,
investigations <investigations@cbc.ca>,
iteam
<iteam@cbc.ca>
http://eateshite.blogspot.ca/2016/02/david-amosthe-eleven-million-dollar.html
Monday,
22 February 2016
David Amos...The "Eleven Million Dollar"
Paedophile
PREFACE.... Years ago each and every Canadian province had
eugenics
legislation that permitted the government to sterilize retards
and
retarded women to prevent them from having children like David
Amos.
This make everyone and his dog long for those good old
days!
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date:
Wed, 27 Jan 2016 19:54:24 -0400
Subject: Re My calls about Federal Court File
# T-1557-15 The
Commionaires, the Canadian Forces, the RCMP and other police
forces
etc are mentioned thoughout my complaint Paragraph 20 is just
one
example
To: bbrydon@commissionaires.ns.ca,
gordonabarnett@yahoo.ca,
darrell.harvey@ns.sympatico.ca,
nbvpa@cpi-ac.ca, president@cpi-ac.ca,
secretary@cpi-ac.ca,
ethicschairman@cpi-ac.ca,
peipa@cpi-ac.ca,
"Jonathan.Vance"
<Jonathan.Vance@forces.gc.ca>,
"john.warr"
<john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc:
David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
upriverwatch
<upriverwatch@gmail.com>,
COCMoncton <COCMoncton@gmail.com>,
mcq@nb.sympatico.ca,
info@nbshalegascomm.ca,
Nika.Joncas-Bourget@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca,
"peter.dauphinee"
<peter.dauphinee@gmail.com>,
markandcaroline
<markandcaroline@gmail.com>,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
"David.Coon"
<David.Coon@gnb.ca>,
"ron.tremblay2"
<ron.tremblay2@gmail.com>
https://kentcountynbenvironmentwatch.wordpress.com/2014/10/31/investigation-into-rcmp-response-to-kent-county-nb-anti-fracking-protests-june-december-2013/
https://www.nbchf-cnbfh.ca/submission/notre-environnement-notre-choix-our-environment-our-choice
http://www.goc411.ca/Employees/Details/44720
http://thenewtownsquare.ca/?p=3
http://thenewtownsquare.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/2014-10-28-Mandate-from-Bill-Brydon-201410031116.pdf
https://www.twinbirchconsulting.com/contact.html
http://nbchf-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/submissions/9waisw3tyb9-b65310c21c6b1fc86dfd471af205f481.pdf
http://cpi-ac.ca/index.php/member-firms/nova-scotia
Commissionaires
Nova Scotia
PO Box 2063
Halifax, NS B3J 2Z1
Phone: 902-429-8101
Fax:
902-429-0592
Email: bbrydon@commissionaires.ns.ca
Website:
http://www.commissionaires.ns.ca
President Thomas
McNulty
Office: (506)-650-3971
Email: president@cpi-ac.ca
Secretary
& Media
Floyd Meunier
Office: (506) 859-0484
Cell: (506)
863-3265
Fax: (506) 382-1470
Email: secretary@cpi-ac.ca
NEW
BRUNSWICK VICE-PRESIDENT
John Sabine
Phone: 506-832-1894
Email: nbvpa@cpi-ac.ca
PRINCE
EDWARD ISLAND VICE-PRESIDENT
David MacDonald
Office: (902)
892-9640
Fax: (902) 892-7025
Email:peipa@cpi-ac.ca
ETHICS
COMMITTEE
Mike Gautreau
Office: Office: (506)-866-8777
Email: ethicschairman@cpi-ac.ca
Hereto
attached are some of documents that are now before Federal
Court right
now.
The text of my filings can be found here.
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
Your
lawyers will have to query the docket to see the CROWN's filing
as they
contain an amazing amount of desperate bullshit that I could
not possibly
scan.
This was what was said in the past month before the court during
oral
arguments pertaining to Federal Court File no T-1557-15
Dec
14th
https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
Jan
11th
https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
http://commissionaires.ns.ca/?page_id=236
Deputy
Commissioner Steve W. Graham,OOM, BA, MBA (Ret’d)
Executive
Committee
D/Commr Graham is the former Deputy Commissioner East,
responsible for
RCMP services in the provinces of Ontario, Quebec and the
Atlantic
Provinces, retiring 8 June 2013 after 38 years service with the
RCMP.
Prior to this appointment, he was the Deputy Commissioner
Atlantic
Canada and Commanding Officer for Nova Scotia (“H” Division). He
also
has served as the Commanding Officer of New Brunswick (“J”
Division)
and Prince Edward (“L” Division). D/Commr Graham was selected to
the
CNS Board in January 2011.
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
20.
The Plaintiff states that the RCMP and the members of the FPF
who harassed
the Plaintiff in September of 2006 while he was a
candidate in the NB
provincial election would not explain why the NB
Sergeant-at-Arms and the COC
had barred him with a document written in
English only or why it was not
published in the Royal Gazette. Members
of the FPF who violated the
Plaintiff’s privacy trying to read an
email that he was composing on a laptop
within his car parked on
private property refused to explain why they thought
they had the
right do so as they attempted to interrogate him without a
warrant or
due process of law. Members of the FPF refused to take the
same
documents the RCMP had so that their major crimes unit could
finally
investigate after they demanded that the Plaintiff identify himself
so
they could check for warrants for his arrest. The FPF would not
discuss
what they would do if he returned to the UNB campus or if he
parked a vehicle
and put money in a parking meter on the side of Queen
Street claimed by the
Sergeant-at-Arms. In February of 2007 after a
Cabinet Minister of NB
acknowledged his concerns with the RCMP, his
children took pictures of the
Plaintiff standing on the legislative
property and the Sergeant-at-Arms and
the FPF did nothing that day.
However, the police harassment got worse
afterwards. The FPF tried to
call him a criminal while the Plaintiff waited
for answers before he
argued the Crown in court about his property that the
FPF had
illegally seized. The text of two emails that the Crown and the
FPF
sent in 2007 are as follows:
“Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007
12:02:35 -0400
From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject:
January 30, 2007
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Mr. David Amos
Dear Mr. Amos:
This will
acknowledge receipt of a copy of
your e-mail of December
29, 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
Because of the
nature of the allegations made in your message, I
have taken
the
measure of forwarding a copy to
Assistant
Commissioner Steve Graham
of the RCMP “J”
Division in Fredericton .
Sincerely,
Honourable Michael B. Murphy
Minister of
Health”
AND
“From: “Lafleur, Lou” lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com,
Subject: Fredericton Police Force
Date:
Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:21:13 -0300
Dear Mr.
Amos
My Name is Lou LaFleur and I am a Detective with
the
Fredericton Police Major Crime Unit. I would like to talk to
you
regarding files that I am investigating and that you are alleged
to
have involvement in.
Please call me at your earliest
convenience and leave a
message and a phone number on my secure and
confidential line if I am
not in my office.
yours
truly,
Cpl. Lou LaFleur
Fredericton Police Force
311 Queen St.
Fredericton, NB
506-460-2332
21. The Plaintiff states that by September of 2007, he was
told by
police officers and others that he was barred from the town
of
Woodstock, the House of Commons, the National Capital
District
including Rideau Hall and the University of Ottawa, the
Capital
District of NB including the Lieutenant Governor’s residence and
the
University of NB, all other legislative properties in Canada and
that
a photograph of him was posted inside the NB legislative building,
the
Fredericton airport and at least one mining property guarded by
the
Corps of Commissionaires.
22. The Plaintiff states that on or
about September 13, 2007 during a
conversation with the office of the Speaker
of the House of Commons he
was referred to the Sergeant-at-Arms in order to
find out if the
Plaintiff was truly barred from the House of Commons and if
he had
been sent an answer to the documentation the Speaker and
the
government of Iceland received in May of 2006. The
Sergeant-at-Arms
was apparently well aware of his concerns because he said he
knew the
Plaintiff from a past life and quickly hung up the telephone.
The
Sergeant-at-Arms never did answer the Plaintiff and ignored all
his
contacts ever since.
23. The Plaintiff states that the odd
response from Sergeant-at-Arms
of the House of Commons caused him to research
how they knew each
other. The public record states that in June of 2005 the
RCMP officer
acting as Aide-de-Camp to the NB Lieutenant Governor retired
and
joined the House of Commons as Director of Security Operations.
On
September 1, 2006, he became the Sergeant-at-Arms of the House
of
Commons. Therefore, because of all three of his positions from June
of
2004 to December of 2014, the Sergeant-at-Arms of the House of
Commons
must have agreed and seconded his fellow Sergeant-at-Arms in NB
and
his threats to arrest Plaintiff if he reappeared on
parliamentary
property.
24. The Plaintiff states that with regards to
this complaint about
being illegally barred from parliamentary properties,
the most recent
contact from the Crown was the three members of the RCMP who
harassed
the Plaintiff at 1:30 AM on December 16, 2014 not long after he
had
received an email from a former CSIS agent who is the
current
Sergeant-at-Arms of the legislative assembly of
Alberta.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David
Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date:
Fri, 22 Jan 2016 17:37:06 -0400
Subject: Re Federal Court File # T-1557-15
Whereas outside counsel for
the RCMP now prefer emails from me rather than
confer in private
please allow me to introduce Andrew Kemp to Mark
Ertel
To: akemp <akemp@andrewkemp.ca>,
"craig.callens"
<craig.callens@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
m.ertel@bsbcriminallaw.com,
"roger.l.brown"
<roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"bob.paulson"
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"lianna.longo"
<lianna.longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Ian.McPhail"
<Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>,
lporteous@kleinlyons.com,
sunrayzulu
<sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>,
"Paul.Lynch" <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>,
patrick_doran1
<patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>,
pol7163
<pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>,
Glen Canning <grcanning@gmail.com>,
police
<police@halifax.ca>,
mnielsen <mnielsen@pgcitizen.ca>
Cc:
David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
Tracey Matters
<traceymatters@bigpond.com>,
cward@laxtonco.com,
"Colin.Warwick"
<Colin.Warwick@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Paul.Collister"
<Paul.Collister@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
radical <radical@radicalpress.com>,
"Jacques.Poitras"
<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>,
nmoore
<nmoore@bellmedia.ca>,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
"Leanne.Fitch"
<Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>
http://www.princegeorgecitizen.com/news/local-news/rcmp-respond-to-matters-civil-suit-1.1737963
RCMP
respond to Matters civil suit
Mark NIELSEN / Prince George Citizen
January
21, 2015 10:25 AM
Andrew Kemp,
Lawyer & Mediator
411 Quebec
Street, Suite 204
Prince George, BC V2L 1W5
akemp@andrewkemp.ca
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/rcmp-labour-code-moncton-shootings-1.3413830
RCMP
chooses trial by judge on Labour Code charges
4 charges relate to equipment,
training and supervision after 3
officers killed, 2 wounded by Justin
Bourque
CBC News Posted: Jan 22, 2016 6:00 AM AT
Mark
Ertel
Ottawa, Ontario,
Canada
Phone:
613-604-2188
877-786-4479
Fax:
613-236-6958
E-mail:
m.ertel@bsbcriminallaw.com
Too
Too Funny Parker Rudderham's old lawyer buddy turns on him
http://www.frankmagazine.ca/node/4355
Oct 24, 2015
- Did Joel Pink call the cops on me? This bit of
correspondence, direct from
the chrome-domed Pink Larkin partner's
lair in the Trillium
building
HOWEVER THIS WAS NOT FUNNY AT ALL
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2012/11/01/frank_magazine_owner_to_fight_ticket_after_fatal_collision_in_cape_breton.html
Frank
magazine owner to fight ticket after fatal collision in Cape Breton
Prominent
businessman Parker Rudderham was fined $399.91 after his
Cadillac Escalade
collided with a motorcycle, killing the motorcycle
driver.
By:
Karissa Donkin Staff Reporter, Published on Thu Nov 01 2012
A prominent
Cape Breton businessman plans to fight a $399.91 Motor
Vehicle Act ticket he
received after he was involved in a fatal
collision.
Douglas Parker
Rudderham is president and CEO of Quebec-based Pharmacy
Wholesale Services
Inc., a company that bills itself on its website as
“the largest privately
held wholesale medical diagnostics distributor
in North
America.”
“It’s like anybody else, you get a speeding ticket, and you
don’t
agree with it, you contest it,” said Joel Pink, Rudderham’s
lawyer.
The 57-year-old also owns Coltsfoot Publishing, which
publishes
Halifax-based Frankmagazine, a news, commentary and satire
magazine
that tackles everything from politics to the local rumour
mill.
On Sept. 14, Rudderham was driving his Cadillac Escalade in
Sydney,
N.S. around 4 p.m. when his vehicle collided with a
motorcycle
travelling in front of him.
The motorcycle driver,
67-year-old Jack MacDonald, was pronounced dead
at the scene.
Since
then, the collision has been the talk of Cape Breton, said
MacDonald’s
sister-in-law, who did not want to be named. “You can’t go
anywhere.
Everybody’s talking about it.”
MacDonald’s sister-in-law said he once sat
on a committee to have
traffic lights installed at the intersection. “He
tried really, really
hard but to no avail.”
MacDonald was on his way
home from getting a haircut when the
collision happened, she
said.
Investigators ruled out criminal negligence in the collision,
but
police “still believe that (Rudderham) was responsible for
the
collision,” said Cape Breton Regional Police Service
spokeswoman
Desiree Vassallo.
He has been charged with failing to
drive or operate a motor vehicle
in a careful and prudent manner under the
Motor Vehicle Act, she said.
In addition to a fine, the charge carries a
penalty of six demerit
points.
Pink said Rudderham, who goes by his
middle name, Parker, intends to
plead not guilty in January, sending the
matter to trial.
“Mr. Rudderham believes in principle. He’s not the type
of person who
pleads (guilty) to something that he didn’t do just to get out
of it,”
Pink said.
“He could pay $399 and go home and accumulate six
points and that’s it
. . . but he definitely says that he was not driving
carelessly or
imprudently.”
Pink said his client is grieving for
MacDonald’s family.
---------- Forwarded message
----------
From: "Chisholm, Jill" <Jill.Chisholm@justice.gc.ca>
Date:
Thu, 21 Jan 2016 19:43:52 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re Federal Court
File # T-1557-15 For the
Public Record I just called the lawyers Duff
Conacher and David Baker
and they paled dumb as usual
To: David Amos
<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank
you for your message. I will be away from the office until
Monday, January
25, 2016 and will not be accessing email frequently
during this time. Should
you require assistance please contact
Jacqueline Fenton at (902) 426-6996.
Otherwise I will be pleased to
respond to your message upon my
return.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos
<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date:
Thu, 21 Jan 2016 15:43:48 -0400
Subject: Re Federal Court File # T-1557-15
For the Public Record I
just called the lawyers Duff Conacher and David Baker
and they paled
dumb as usual
To: duff@goodorg.ca, dbaker@bakerlaw.ca,
"bill.pentney"
<bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>,
"jill.chisholm"
<jill.chisholm@justice.gc.ca>,
"david.hansen"
<david.hansen@justice.gc.ca>,
mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"Gilles.Moreau"
<Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"dean.buzza"
<dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Michael.Wernick"
<Michael.Wernick@pco-bcp.gc.ca>
Cc:
David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Lets
see if the Upper Canadian lawyers can understand an old voicemail
from Brazil
and a Published email exchange EH Michael.Wernick???
http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html
Duff
Conacher, LL.B.
Director, GoodOrg.ca Consulting
416-546-3443
duff@goodorg.ca
David
Baker B.A., LL.B., LL.M., L.S.M.
email: dbaker@bakerlaw.ca
phone:
416 533-0040, ext. 222
---------- Forwarded message
----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date:
Thu, 21 Jan 2016 12:57:07 -0400
Subject: Well Greta.Bossenmaier the latest
boss of the CSE can never
deny that all of the "Five Eyes" are well aware of
me now N'esy Pas
Elizabeth May?
To: WhistleblowerProtection@tigta.treas.gov,
Paul.Samyn@freepress.mb.ca,
"george.osborne.mp"
<george.osborne.mp@parliament.uk>,
J.Key@ministers.govt.nz,
SpeakersOffice3@parliament.govt.nz,
Andrew.Robb.MP@aph.gov.au,
"George.Soros"
<George.Soros@opensocietyfoundations.org>,
"stephen.harper.a1"
<stephen.harper.a1@parl.gc.ca>,
"elizabeth.may"
<elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca>,
"David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>,
gopublic
<gopublic@cbc.ca>,
whistle <whistle@fsa.gov.uk>,
washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>,
whistleblower
<whistleblower@finra.org>,
Whistleblower <Whistleblower@ctv.ca>,
crof@shaw.ca, "justin.ling"
<justin.ling@vice.com>,
editor@thetyee.ca,
Karine
Fortin <info@ndp.ca>,
"carolyn.bennett"
<carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca>,
Doug@dougeyolfson.ca,
doug.eyolfson@parl.gc.ca,
fpcity@freepress.mb.ca,
w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca,
"Paul.Lynch" <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>,
"Marianne.Ryan"
<Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
sunrayzulu
<sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>,
dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca,
"john.green"
<john.green@gnb.ca>,
chiefape <chiefape@gmail.com>,
Catherine.Harrop@cbc.ca,
"redmond.shannon" <redmond.shannon@cbc.ca>,
Joe
Friday <Friday.Joe@psic-ispc.gc.ca>,
loyalistlaw@gmail.com,
"steve.roberge"
<steve.roberge@gnb.ca>,
"robert.stoney"
<robert.stoney@gnb.ca>,
"Leanne.Fitch" <Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>,
tj@burkelaw.ca,
"lou.lafleur" <lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca>,
jeddy@coxandpalmer.com,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
andre
<andre@jafaust.com>,
"greg.byrne" <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>,
paulzed@zed.ca,
smay@coxandpalmer.com,
nbpc <nbpc@gnb.ca>,
"Greta.Bossenmaier"
<Greta.Bossenmaier@cse-cst.gc.ca>,
"Jonathan.Vance"
<Jonathan.Vance@forces.gc.ca>,
"jon.gerrard"
<jon.gerrard@leg.gov.mb.ca>,
Karen.Kraushaar@tigta.treas.gov,
"roger.l.brown"
<roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Wayne.Gallant"
<Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc:
halifaxmedia@state.gov,
ACS@state.gov, consularh@state.gov,
David
Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
j.russell.george@tigta.treas.gov,
Complaints@tigta.treas.gov,
TIGTAcommunications
<TIGTAcommunications@tigta.treas.gov>,
David.barnes@tigta.treas.gov
Afte
all US Ambassador Bruce Heyman and US Consul General Steven
Giegerich cannot
deny that the CBC and a former US Ambassador got
exactly the same pile of
document from Mean Old Me just in time for my
birthday in July of 2002
CORRECT? Berfore Anyone tries to deny it
perhaps you should review page 14 of
the pdf hereto attached then read
all the rest rather closely N'esy
Pas?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
http://halifax.usconsulate.gov/news_events/2015/halifax-welcomes-new-consul-general.html
Purdy's
Wharf Tower II
1969 Upper Water Street, Suite 904
Halifax, NS B3J
3R7
Phone 1-902-429-2480
Email for questions relating to services for
American citizens:
Halifax-ACS@state.gov.
Email
for questions about non-immigrant visas: consularh@state.gov.
Please
note questions will not receive a response if the answer is on
the
website.
Email for media inquiries: halifaxmedia@state.gov
http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html
-----
Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To:
<Glenn.Greenwald@guardian.co.uk>;
<info@praxisfilms.org>;
"birgittaj"
<birgittaj@althingi.is>;
"ed.pilkington"
<ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>;
"steven.blaney"
<steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>;
"roger.l.brown"
<roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc:
"David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>;
<DANIEL.POULIN@CHRC-CCDP.CA>;
<abromberg@bnaibrith.ca>;
<habrams@pacificcoast.net>;
"ndesrosiers" <ndesrosiers@ccla.org>
Sent:
Sunday, August 18, 2013 10:54 PM
Subject: Snowden ain't got nothing on mean
old me when it comes to
dealing with corrupt Feds and keeping one's Integrity
as well
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos
<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date:
Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:40:18 -0300
Subject: YO FBI Special Agent Richard
Deslauriers I just called your
office and the nasty Yankee played dumb as
usual
To: boston@ic.fbi.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
"bob.paulson"
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Kevin.leahy"
<Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov,
us.marshals@usdoj.gov,
Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov,
jcarney
<jcarney@carneybassil.com>,
bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net
Cc:
David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
birgittaj
<birgittaj@althingi.is>,
shmurphy@globe.com,
Red Ice Creations
<redicecreations@gmail.com>
Clearly
I am not joking
Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit
19,571
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 153.31.113.# (FBI Criminal Justice
Information Systems)
ISP FBI Criminal Justice Information Systems
Location
Continent : North America
Country : United States (Facts)
State : West
Virginia
City : Clarksburg
Lat/Long : 39.2664, -80.3097 (Map)
Language
English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet
Explorer 8.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0;
.NET
CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022;
InfoPath.2;
.NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 1.1.4322;
MS-RTC
LM 8; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor
Resolution : 800 x 600
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Jun 12 2013
5:00:01 pm
Last Page View Jun 12 2013 5:00:01 pm
Visit Length 0
seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://www.google.co...YIZDuTIWsfuPUhflswCk
Search
Engine google.com
Search Words jp morgan and "andrew
kosloff"
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...-stewart-and-me.html
Visit Exit
Page http://davidamos.blo...-stewart-and-me.html
Out
Click
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Jun 12 2013 4:00:01 pm
Visit
Number 19,571
On 6/15/13, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
wrote:
> FBI Boston
> One Center Plaza
> Suite 600
>
Boston, MA 02108
> Phone: (617) 742-5533
> Fax: (617)
223-6327
> E-mail: Boston@ic.fbi.gov
>
>
Hours
> Although we operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, our
normal
> "walk-in" business hours are from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.,
Monday
> through Friday. If you need to speak with a FBI representative at
any
> time other than during normal business hours, please telephone
our
> office at (617) 742-5533.
>
>
> ----------
Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300
> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and Brian
Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is
> finally underway now correct? What
the hell do I do with the wiretap
> tapes Sell them on Ebay?
> To:
Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov,
us.marshals@usdoj.gov,
>
Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov,
jcarney <jcarney@carneybassil.com>,
>
bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net,
michael wolfheart
> <wolfheartlodge@live.com>,
jonathan.albano@bingham.com,
>
shmurphy@globe.com,
mvalencia@globe.com
>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
oldmaison
> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov,
rounappletree@aol.com
>
>
http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/06/05/james-whitey-bulger-jury-selection-process-enters-second-day/KjS80ofyMMM5IkByK74bkK/story.html
>
>
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>
>
As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask
>
them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>
>
What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>
USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>
cards?
>
> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly2006
>
>
http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>
>
http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>
>
http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>
>
FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
> Senator Arlen Specter
> United
States Senate
> Committee on the Judiciary
> 224 Dirksen Senate
Office Building
> Washington, DC 20510
>
> Dear Mr.
Specter:
>
> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you
from a man
> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the
matters
> raised in the attached letter.
>
> Mr. Amos has
represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>
> I
believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this
previously.
>
> Very truly yours,
> Barry A. Bachrach
>
Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
> Direct facsimile: (508)
929-3003
> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>
>
----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
To: "Fred.Wyshak" <Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov>;
"jcarney"
> <jcarney@carneybassil.com>;
<Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov>;
>
<us.marshals@usdoj.gov>
>
Cc: <edit@thr.com>;
"maritime_malaise" <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>;
>
"Wayne.Lang" <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 11:50 AM
> Subject: So Fred Wyshak has
Brian Kelly and the rest of the corrupt
> Feds practiced the spirit of
fill disclosure with Jay Carney??
>
> If so then why didn't Mr
Carney return my phone calls last July???
>
> http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2012/01/09/bulger_lawyers_due_in_court_for_update_on_evidence/
>
>
http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/lawyer_known_as_patron_saint_of_hopeless_cases_is_representing_whitey_bulge/
>
>
http://bostonherald.com/news/regional/view/2011_0625lawyer_tab_is_in_billys_court_feds_believe_brother_should_shell_out_for_defense
>
>
http://articles.boston.com/2011-07-01/news/29726987_1_jay-carney-bulger-brookline-clinics
>
>
http://carneybassil.com/team/carney/
>
>
Truth is stranger than fiction. Perhaps Ben Affleck and Matt Damon a
>
couple of boyz from Beantown who done good will pay attention to mean
>
old me someday EH?
>
> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/ben-affleck-matt-damon-whitey-bulger-254994
>
>
Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
Methinks PCs went the way of the Dodo Bird Many Moons ago. N'esy Pas?
BTW I did my best to explain why PCs should be proud on the radio before the last election was history and the Liberals swept the Maritimes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgTsmzbasCA