Well at least the CECC got my email EH Deacon René Laprise ?
http://www.cccb.ca/site/eng/contact-us/general-secretariat/36-general-secretariat/2-rene-laprise
Home Contact Us General Secretariat
Director of Media Relations
2500 Don Reid Drive
Ottawa Ontario
K1H 2J2
Telephone: (613) 241-9461 ext. 225
Fax: (613) 241-9048
http://www.cccb.ca/site/eng/church-in-canada-and-world
-----Original Message-----
From: CECC / CCCB
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 2:04 PM
To: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com
Subject: Copy of: I just called Clearly I was not Joking
Copy of:
This is an enquiry e-mail via http://www.cccb.ca/site/ from:
David Amos <David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com>
902 800 0369
P.O. Box 234
Apohaqui, NB, E5P 3G2
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos"
To: "Rob Talach"
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM
Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing the
Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why
The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should mean a lot
to you
http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf
Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 23,667
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 212.77.30.# (Holy See - Vatican City State)
ISP Holy See - Vatican City State
Location
Continent : Europe
Country : Holy See (Vatican City State) (Facts)
Lat/Long : 41.9, 12.45 (Map)
Language Italian it
Operating System Macintosh WinNT
Browser Safari 1.3
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko)
Chrome/49.0.2623.112 Safari/537.36
Javascript version 1.5
Monitor
Resolution : 1280 x 768
Color Depth : 24 bits
Time of Visit May 3 2016 11:26:43 am
Last Page View May 3 2016 11:26:43 am
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL https://www.google.it/
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...3/ides-of-march.html
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...3/ides-of-march.html
Out Click
Time Zone UTC+1:00
Visitor's Time May 3 2016 4:26:43 pm
Visit Number 23,667
https://www.archtoronto.org/about-us/departments-%28a-n%29/Cardinal
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 16:16:21 -0400
Subject: Attn Cardinal Thomas Collins I am on the phone to you again
To: archbishop@archtoronto.org
Cc: David Amos
Just Dave
By Location >Visit Detail
Visit 23,667
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 212.77.30.# (Holy See - Vatican City State)
ISP Holy See - Vatican City State
Location
Continent : Europe
Country : Holy See (Vatican City State) (Facts)
Lat/Long : 41.9, 12.45 (Map)
Language Italian it
Operating System Macintosh WinNT
Browser Safari 1.3
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like
Gecko) Chrome/49.0.2623.112 Safari/537.36
Javascript version 1.5
Monitor
Resolution : 1280 x 768
Color Depth : 24 bits
Time of Visit May 3 2016 11:26:43 am
Last Page View May 3 2016 11:26:43 am
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL https://www.google.it/
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...3/ides-of-march.html
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...3/ides-of-march.html
Out Click
Time Zone UTC+1:00
Visitor's Time May 3 2016 4:26:43 pm
Visit Number 23,667
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 19:14:07 -0400
Subject: Attn Cardinal Thomas Collins I just called you and the RCMP
about financial crimes and death threats against my family and I
To: archbishop@archtoronto.org, "bob.paulson"
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, sunrayzulu <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>,
"rod.knecht" <rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>, "Marianne.Ryan"
<Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "paul.looker"
<paul.looker@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bernadine.chapman"
<bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, police <police@fredericton.ca>,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, frankffrost
<frankffrost@hotmail.com>, radical <radical@radicalpress.com>,
"t.wilson" <t.wilson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "jennifer.johnston"
<jennifer.johnston@gov.bc.ca>, "Geoffrey.McDonald"
<Geoffrey.McDonald@gov.bc.ca>, "shirley.bond.mla"
<shirley.bond.mla@leg.bc.ca>
http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/
http://www.archtoronto.org/arch_offices/archbishop.html
Office of the Archbishop
Catholic Pastoral Centre
1155 Yonge Street
Toronto, Ontario, M4T 1W2
Telephone: (416) 934-0606, ext. 609
Fax: (416) 934-3452
Email: archbishop@archtoronto.org
I spoke in defense of your new Pope perhaps he should speak in defense
of my children
http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html
"These are the cover letters for the documents I sent to the UN Dudes
http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/UN%20DUDES-txt.pdf
BTW Perhaps the times are a changing now that the stock market is
falling bigtime once again. Believe or not I am kinda sorta impressed
by the words of the latest Pope. I can'tbelieve a Jesuit would say
such things. Amazing things never cease.
The Dec 12th,2002 date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of
mine and the name of Cardinal Bernard Francis Law should mean a lot to
him if he truly has an ethical soul and is wise enough to ignore his
many lawyers.
http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_Francis_Law
Law resigned as Archbishop of Boston on December 13, 2002, in response
to the Roman Catholic Church sex abuse scandal after church documents
were revealed which suggested he had covered up sexual abuse committed
by priests in his archdiocese.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
1 902 800 0369"
http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/world/story/1.2497859
Toronto Cardinal Thomas Collins among Pope Francis's new advisers
New commision named following financial scandals at the Vatican
The Associated Press
Posted:Jan 15, 2014 3:33 PM ET
Last Updated:Jan 15, 2014 3:33 PM ET
Pope Francis made another move to clean house at the troubled Vatican
bank on Wednesday, naming a new roster of cardinal advisers —
including Toronto's Cardinal Thomas Collins — to replace the ones who
were in place during its latest brushes with scandal.
Only one cardinal from the previous commission overseeing the bank's
operations, Cardinal Jean-Louis Tauran, survived the cut.
Francis on Wednesday named four others to round out the commission,
including his hand-picked secretary of state, Cardinal-elect Pietro
Parolin, and Francis' close friend Cardinal Santos Abril y Castello.
The obscure world of Vatican finances
Pope Francis vows to change Vatican thinking
Canadian cardinals: 1886-2012
The other members include Cardinal Christoph Schoenborn, archbishop of
Vienna, and Cardinal Thomas Collins, archbishop of Toronto.
On Feb. 16, 2013, just days after announcing his resignation, Pope
Benedict XVI confirmed the existing members of the bank's supervisory
body for another five years. The members included Benedict's longtime
deputy and secretary of state, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, who was
widely blamed for many of the Vatican's administrative shortcomings
during Benedict's papacy.
Francis has now essentially undone Benedict's decree, relieving
Bertone and the other commission members of their jobs as he moves
forward with his reform of the bank, formally known as the Institute
for Religious Works.
Over the summer, Francis named a trusted friend, Monsignor Battista
Ricca, to fill a vacant supervisory position and appointed an
independent commission of inquiry to look into the bank's activities
and legal status.
Financial scandals at the Vatican
Those decisions were taken in the days surrounding the July 1 ouster
of the bank's top two managers and the arrest of a Vatican accountant
with several Vatican bank accounts on charges he plotted to smuggle
about $29.7 million into Italy from Switzerland. The accountant,
dubbed "Monsignor 500" for the types of euro notes he purportedly
favoured, is currently on trial in Rome on the smuggling charge and is
also under investigation in his native Salerno, a city in southern
Italy, in a money-laundering case involving his Vatican accounts.
Prior to that affair was the controversial 2012 ouster of the bank's
then-president, Ettore Gotti Tedeschi. The board accused Gotti
Tedeschi of incompetence and failing to do his job.
And before that, in 2010, Italian police seized $34.2 million from an
IOR account and Rome prosecutors placed the IOR's then-president,
Gotti Tedeschi, and general director Paolo Cipriani under
investigation for alleged violations of anti-money laundering norms in
conducting a routine transaction from a Vatican account at an Italian
bank. The money was eventually unfrozen. Gotti Tedeschi was
subsequently exonerated as a suspect. Cipriani hasn't been charged.
In 2012, under pressure from the Bank of Italy, U.S. bank JPMorgan
closed its IOR accounts. And in December of 2012, again under pressure
from the Bank of Italy, Deutsche Bank Italia halted its 15-year term
providing electronic payment services to the Vatican, leaving the tiny
city state cash-only for months.
The five-member Cardinal's Commission, as it is known, names the lay
board of the Vatican bank and its top two general managers and makes
sure they adhere to the bank's mission to administer money for works
of charity.
© The Canadian Press, 2014
http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/fwd-mikey-duffy-and-lawyers-petey.html
http://www.scribd.com/doc/2619608/Upper-Canadians
From: "Bastarache, Michel (Heenan Blaikie)" <MBastarache@heenan.ca>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 23:21:32 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : Mikey Duffy and the lawyers Petey
MacKay and Arty Hamilton should remember the file called "Upper
Canadians" quite well EH Mr Harper
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Je serai absent jusqu`au 1er novembre 2013. Vous pouvez communiquez
avec mon adjointe Louise Belleau au 613-236-1668.
I will be away from the office until November 1st, 2013. If you
require assistance, please contact my assistant Louise Belleau at
613-236-1668
Merci / Thank you
M Bastarache
Michel Bastarache
Avocat-Conseil / Counsel
Litige
HEENAN BLAIKIE SRL / LLP
T 613 236.3488
F 866 441.2699 mbastarache@heenan.ca
55, rue Metcalfe, bureau 300, Ottawa (Ontario) Canada K1P 6L5
55 Metcalfe Street, Suite 300, Ottawa, Ontario Canada K1P 6L5
Ce courriel pourrait contenir des renseignements confidentiels ou
privilégiés. Si vous n'êtes pas le véritable destinataire, veuillez
nous en aviser immédiatement. Merci.
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you
are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately. Thank
you.
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
To: "Rob Talach" <rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM
Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing
the Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why
The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should mean
a lot to you
http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
To: <mbastarache@heenan.ca>; <Harper.S@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: "Duceppe. G" <Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca>; "layton. j" <Layton.J@parl.gc.ca>;
"MichaelB. Murphy" <MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca>; <moore.r@parl.gc.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 1:00 PM
Subject: It was a pleasure talking to you Mr Bastarache see you all in
court.
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <Daniel.Nadeau@priv.gc.ca>; <ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca>;
"Jessica Hume" <jessica.hume@sunmedia.ca>
Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; "dean.delmastro.c1"
<dean.delmastro.c1@parl.gc.ca>; "radical" <radical@radicalpress.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 2:39 AM
Subject: Re Glen Greenwald and the Brazilian President Rousseff's indignant
tweets So Stevey Boy Harper your CSEC dudes and their NSA pals no doubt
know all about my conversation with the dudes from Brazil last month Wheras
the CBC and the Guardian etc want to know it all we should share EH?
From: Tom Pulcine <Tom.Pulcine@priv.gc.ca>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 06:31:03 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re Glen Greenwald and the Brazilian
President Rousseff's indignant tweets So Stevey Boy Harper your CSEC
dudes and their NSA pals no doubt know all about my conversation with
the dudes from Brazil last month Wheras the CBC and the Guar...
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Effective December 8, 2011, I have retired from the Public Service. My
replacement as CFO and DG Corporate Services is Daniel Nadeau. He
can be reach at 613-996-5336.
Je suis retraité de la fonction publique à compter du 8 décembre 2011.
Daniel Nadeau sera mon remplaçant à titre d’APF et Directeur général
de la gestion intégrée. Il peut être joint au 613-996-5336.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 03:29:59 -0300
Subject: Re Glen Greenwald and the Brazilian President Rousseff's
indignant tweets So Stevey Boy Harper your CSEC dudes and their NSA
pals no doubt know all about my conversation with the dudes from
Brazil last month Wheras the CBC and the Guardian etc want to know it
all we should share EH?
To: pm@pm.gc.ca, dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, rusun@un.int,
john.adams@queensu.ca, John.Forster@cse-cst.gc.ca,
td.ombudsman@td.com, christopher.montague@td.com,
Frank.McKenna@td.com, Glenn.Greenwald@guardian.co.uk,
info@praxisfilms.org, birgittaj@althingi.is,
ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk, steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca,
roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, ambassador@brasilemb.org,
slrc@itamaraty.gov.br, cuba@un.int, protocol@dn.mofa.go.jp,
japan.mission@dn.mofa.go.jp, protocol@s1.mofa.go.jp,
j.kroes@interpol.int, craig.dalton@forces.gc.ca, bairdj@parl.gc.ca,
MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca,
shy.winkfield@guardiannews.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca, justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca,
bginsberg@pattonboggs.com, RBauer@perkinscoie.com, justmin@gov.ns.ca,
rmellish@pattersonlaw.ca, rmordenassoc@rogers.com, merricra@gov.ns.ca,
stephen.m.cutler@jpmorgan.com, boston@ic.fbi.gov,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, prenquiries@eiu.com,
mailbox@brasembottawa.org, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca,
newsroom@theguardian.pe.ca, criminal.division@usdoj.gov,
lachapelle.edith@psic-ispc.gc.ca, Janet.MacLean@international.gc.ca,
dfildebrandt@taxpayer.com, ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca,
themayor@calgary.ca, atlantic.director@taxpayer.com,
premier@gov.ab.ca, premier@gnb.ca, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
jamiebaillie@gov.ns.ca, bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net,
nichor@parl.gc.ca, greg.weston@cbc.ca, Manon.Hardy@priv.gc.ca,
Dion.Mario@psic-ispc.gc.ca, csu@jesuits.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, Julian.Borger@guardian.co.uk
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/07/31/greece-imf-brazil-idUSL6N0G05GI20130731
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/24/brazil-president-un-speech-nsa-surveillance
http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/politics/story/1.1928147
https://mobile.twitter.com/dilmabr
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 03:14:34 -0300
Subject: Fwd: I just called Re the Boss of DFAIT John Baird Versus the
Boss of Russia Shame on all you Warmongers EH Stephen Harper?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Hey
The sneaky ex CSIS dude Michelle Juneau-Katsuya was not wise to call
the President of Brazil a Prima Donna but what he said is true about
her merely playing politcs Everybody who wants to know can know what
happened between Brazil and I since early 2005. All they have to do is
ask me. If they don't believe me they can call the Boys from Brazil
and ask them if what I said in the video hereto attached or the
documents I to them and many other UN dudes long ago is true or false.
Trust that Stevey Harper, Franky McKenna and the rest of the
IMF/Bilderberger crowd ain't gonna tell anyone anything. EH Bobby
Bauer and Stevey Cutler?
The video is just a clip from a longer conversation with a good friend
weeks ago. Perhaps your snoopy minions in the RCMP/DND should be wise
to listen to it all if they haven't already EH?
Anyone can find that chat saved here
http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio/index.php?dir=DavidAmos/
It is entitled as follows
2013-09-21 time 16_34_08 Incoming Peer-to-Peer Call david.raymond.amos
http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio/index.php?dir=DavidAmos/
These are the cover letters for the documents I sent to the UN Dudes
http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/UN%20DUDES-txt.pdf
BTW Perhaps the times are a changing now that the stock market is
falling bigtime once again. Believe or not I am kinda sorta impressed
by the words of the latest Pope. I can'tbelieve a Jesuit would say
such things. Amazing things never cease.
The Dec 12th,2002 date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of
mine and the name of Cardinal Bernard Francis Law should mean a lot to
him if he truly has an ethical soul and is wise enough to ignore his
many lawyers.
http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_Francis_Law
Law resigned as Archbishop of Boston on December 13, 2002, in response
to the Roman Catholic Church sex abuse scandal after church documents
were revealed which suggested he had covered up sexual abuse committed
by priests in his archdiocese.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
1 902 800 0369
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
To: <TMyatt@unb.ca>; "rmoir" <rmoir@unbsj.ca>; <rhill@unbsj.ca>;
<newsroom@telegraphjournal.com>; <eric.brame@knights.ucf.edu>;
<keith_thompson09@hotmail.com>; <paulzed@zed.ca>; <bcc@rcav.bc.ca>;
<editor@tribunenb.ca>; <moniteur@rogers.com>; <tnf@nbnet.nb.ca>;
<editor@catholicregister.org>; "drcarley" <drcarley@gmail.com>;
"Sheldon Day" <gem3intucson@q.com>; <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>;
<deanr0032@hotmail.com>; "Dean.Buzza" <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
"dean" <dean@law.ualberta.ca>; <zorroboy2009@hotmail.com>;
<tony@peoplestandup.ca>; "Frank. McKenna" <Frank.McKenna@td.com>
Cc: "rick. miles" <rick.miles@gnb.ca>; <oldmaison@yahoo.com>;
"jack.macdougall" <jack.macdougall@greenparty.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 11:19 PM
Subject: RE the confused Eric M. Brame concerned about NWO and some
very dumb Maritime Professors who think they know how to play politics
and argue ethical people at the same time
I would eat Chucky Leblanc's blogger hat if he could prove that the
UNB Profs Myatt and Hill are not very familiar with my work However
you corrupt liberals are kinda lucky that the former Brit and his ex
priest NDP boss and everybody else are too chicken to mention the
elephant in the room who is preparing to run again for the fifth time
whilst suing the the CROWN EH Ricky Baby Miles? how long do you think
it will be before somebody finally says my name in just the right
forum and the jig is up on you all?
http://www.economics-antitextbook.com/
http://nbndp.ca/node/265
Economist Tony Myatt to Run for New Democrats
Economist quoted by Alward Conservatives chooses NDP, says Alward not
fiscally responsible
FREDERICTON – University of New Brunswick economist Tony Myatt is
running for the New Democrats in Fredericton-Silverwood in the
upcoming provincial election, New Democrat Leader Roger Duguay
announced today.
http://www.unb.ca/fredericton/arts/departments/economics/people/tmyatt.html
Eric M. Brame You and Thompson are the dudes making movies about evil
people not I. I am the one battling them who was approached by your
fans sugestting that I buy it and watch it as if I don't already know
the score. Perhaps you fellas should stay in school a while longer.
Until the economy recovers in about 20 years or so and I am just
another pissed off ghost may be a good idea EH? In regards to your
selected debate in answer to my statement I was talking about the
Wars started and still ongoing IN THIS CENTURY Never forget your
biblepoundering friends attacking the "Evil Doers" Iraq and
Afganistan for the benefit of whom I must ask? Furthermoe there is no
need to bless me I am not religious at all amd I hate lawyers
religious ones in particular scroll down to see why. GET IT YET DUMMY?
If not why checkout out the work of the evil zionist Barry Winters. Do
ya notice that he compares me to your hero Bill Cooper? Need I say
that I am VERY honoured that that evil bastards such as zionists like
Joe Biden and many of Obama advisors hate mean old me?
http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 22:49:18 -0300
Subject: "From a little spark may burst a mighty flame." Dante from
The Divine Comedy
To: Ruth.Ross@christianlegalfellowship.org, thannigan@ropesgray.com,
csu@jesuits.ca, plocatelli@scu.edu, elliottx@nb.sympatico.ca,
bishop@dioceseofsaintjohn.org, nenprvsj@bc.edu, curia@sjcuria.org,
tsmolich@calprov.org, noprovsj@norprov.org, moprov@jesuits-mis.org,
nykprov@nysj.org, oregonprov@nwjesuits.org,
wisprov@jesuitswisprov.org, sjdet@aol.com, chgprov@jesuits-chi.org,
joseph.herlihy.1@bc.edu, tsmolich@jesuit.org
Cc: IgnatM <IgnatM@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
"oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, danfour
<danfour@myginch.com>, Richard Harris
<injusticecoalition@hotmail.com>, advocacycollective
<advocacycollective@yahoo.com>, krisaustin <krisaustin@panb.org>,
tracy <tracy@jatam.org>
http://davidamos.blogspot.com/2005/03/ides-of-march.html
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Ruth.Ross@christianlegalfellowship.org
Cc: thannigan@ropesgray.com ; csu@jesuits.ca ; robmoore@atrueconservative.ca
;
Correspondance Deputy Prime Minister/Vice premier ministre ;
plocatelli@scu.edu ;
elliottx@nb.sympatico.ca ; bishop@dioceseofsaintjohn.org ; nenprvsj@bc.edu ;
curia@sjcuria.org ; tsmolich@calprov.org ; noprovsj@norprov.org ;
moprov@jesuits-mis.org ; nykprov@nysj.org ; oregonprov@nwjesuits.org ;
wisprov@jesuitswisprov.org ; sjdet@aol.com ; chgprov@jesuits-chi.org ; j
oseph.herlihy.1@bc.edu
Sent: Friday, December 24, 2004 9:24 PM
Subject: one hell of an Email
"From a little spark may burst a mighty flame." Dante from The
Divine Comedy
Heres hoping but I ain't praying I am doing something about
it.
Sent after
Midnight December 25th, 2004 in Rome
David McMath and Walter Kubitz
Ruth Ross Executive Director
Christian Legal Fellowship
790 Franklinway Crescent,
London, ON, Canada. N6G 5C8
RE: Corruption of the Church State and Justice System
Hey,
Pursuant to my calls to all three of your offices yesterday and also
to the office of Msgr. George Martin, the Vicar General of the Diocese of
Saint John. Please find enclosed the hard copy of the material I promised to
send. The CD of the copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in
confidence as officers of the court in order that it may be properly
investigated by law enforcement. This material includes an exact copy of all
material given to our present MP Rob Moore and a copy of a letter given to
the Priest Bill Elliot the following week along with the same material and
three original wiretap tapes. There is no need to give your copies of this
material to the RCMP or CSIS or the Arar Commission because they already
have had theirs for many months. This email was composed in a hurry and sent
out just before leaving our home.
If Mr. Kubitz wishes he may contact me and if we agree he can use
this material to aid him in entering into a personal injury complaint on my
behalf. I have already contacted the lawyer Ann Wheeler of Fredicton and
faxed her this letter and a copy of the Affidavit of mine that was filed in
US District Court on Dec 12th, 2002 that no doubt caused Cardinal Law to
quit his job and run off to Maryland and then Rome. To everyone’s chagrin
the Pope forgot to take him off the Boston Arch Diocese payroll until I
announced my run for Parliament and began attacking the partners of some of
the lawyers that had settled with O’Malley’s new lawyer, Hannigan in 2003. I
had been arguing the Cardinal Law’s other lawyers Todd and Rogers for over a
year and was ignored but as soon as I introduced the other side of the fence
in another dispute into my matters they quickly settled and tried hard to
ignore me some more. Obviously their conspiracy worked against them and
allowed me more time to rope many more corrupt lawyers etc. and drag them
into my affairs. Consider it a simple Maritimer’s backward way of pursuing
justice by intervening into many matters in a unusual and unpredictable
fashion. Feel free to stress test my ethics in any matter but watch out I
don’t drag you into them as well. Some of my concerns involve the crime of
murder.
Stephen Harper should have made certain that his lawyer buddy Rob
Moore had upheld the law as soon as he announced in June on CBC that he had
information about the Arar matter. He made that announcement after stopping
for ice cream in Sussex with Rob Moore and Elsie Wayne. I made certain the
RCMP Officers guarding Harper and the others that day were made well aware
that Rob Moore possessed evidence of criminal matters that should be
investigated immediately. I had someone witness me telling them so and had
photos taken to record the encounter. Call me a liar I dare ya.
When David McMath refused to come to the phone to speak to me, I knew
for certain he knew the score. His secretary was confused as to why he would
not pick up the phone but I was not. He did not want to speak to me because
he knew that in a very few words I could force him to display the integrity
that must befit one of his profession or compel him to prove to me that he
is just another liar. So like most lawyers he tried to duck my concerns and
me. I loved it and laughed at his faint-hearted and predictable antics. I
called the Vicar General Martin and left the voice mail that McMath desired
from me. Nobody has called back to disagree. Perhaps they should talk and
call me back after they receive a copy of this letter by fax and email and
have a long talk with the priest, Bill Elliot. I know for a fact I really
pissed that old bastard off by merely shaking his hand and stating my name
in front of over a hundred of his followers and almost every other Candidate
from two ridings including the winners the liberal Paul Zed and the new
conservative, Rob Moore. I consider both me to be just opposites of the same
counterfeit coin that the people are supposed to trust as genuine. Causing
that evil old priest to lose his temper is one of my fondest memories of my
political campaign along with pissing off Leroy Armstrong in front of his
friends during a debate of federal politicians that he had no business
mouthing off in. Since Bill Elliot wanted people to vote with their
conscience, perhaps he should ask the man they elected Paul Zed and his
friends Joe Day, Henrick Tonning and David Lutz to act according to theirs
if they have any.
Whereas as your organization claims that acting through its
Executive Director, its Board of Directors, its member volunteers, its
lawyers, law students, and friends, the CLF: promotes Alternative Dispute
Resolution which is designed to help Christians solve their disputes outside
of court amongst other things. Perhaps you should inspire the Catholic
Church to settle with me before I sue its fat pious ass. Forgive me for
speaking plain but if you folks do not uphold the law and the Public Trust,
I will also sue you in the same complaint. There is no middle ground for any
lawyer to stand on once I have made them well aware of the reasons behind
this unholy war of words with priests, bankers, statesmen and lawyers.
Whereas you folks brag of your interventions into other matters, why not
invite you to my circus out of the gate?
If anyone cares to notice the Affidavit crucifying Cardinal Law is
witnessed by my brother in law, the lawyer Reid Chedore. He is a religious
man who failed to prove his ethics to me when he sided with my foes to
protect his own pocket book. I am not religious and do not hold with all the
opinions within your good book but agree with many of its words. In my book
there are no degrees of honesty. Lawyers must maintain their oath under rule
of law and answer to the public that trusts them to the same degree as I do
to my own conscience. I answer only to my kin that I respect. Maybe you
folks should talk to Reid and make him see the light, repent his evil ways
and seek my forgiveness instead of talking to my friends and family about my
so-called crazy ways. Yea I am crazy. Crazy like of fox. I never expected
politicians, priests, bankers and lawyers to be honest, so I played them all
like a fiddle in order to dance to my own jig.
I must clearly state that IF I have an unnatural or questionable
demise then my blood will be found on the hands of many a low man in high
places. The Puppet Master over all is none other than the evil Count
Peter-Hans Kolvenbach the Superior General of the Society of Jesus. The fact
that I have encountered so many corrupt Jesuit educated people should make
this painfully obvious to all. It is the General that I am picking a fight
with today because I have lost patience with the incompetence and stupidity
of his foot soldiers. Tis time to take on the Boss. I became very angry by
the fact that he came to speak in Omaha prior to the Federal Election while
his BUDDYS (Bunch of Unethical Dandy Damned Yankee Solicitors) tried to keep
me under lock and key like a caged crazy animal. Yea yea I studied all about
lawyers and Masons and politicians and priests and bankers and their signs
on the dollar etc. I do understand the wicked game and want no part of it. I
view everyone as just people and have no respect for any authority given to
anyone if I do not feel they deserve it.
If someone is sent to my door to attack my kin or me under the veil of
some authority, I take it very personally with the person that approached
me. If they admit their mistake and apologize, I accept it but I demand to
know who sent them and why. If they are liars and will not tell the truth I
find it out for myself. The most glaring example of minor but well connected
crooks would be my wife’s uncle William J. Kickham a wealthy ex FBI agent
and her cousins Charles J. Kickham Jr. and the secretary of Cardinal Law,
then Bishop Lennon and now Bishop O’Malley, Robert T. Kickham. The latter is
priest that shares the same name as the long dead Monsignor Robert T.
Kickham. That bastard in a Black Robe died at a family reunion on Prince
Edward Island. I would not be surprised if Bishop J. Faber MacDonald knows
the Kickhams quite well. I have no doubt that my name has been cursed many
times in conversations between priests and lawyers in Boston and Saint John
in their efforts to impeach my character. I must ask them all why an honest
man is so hard to believe? Let just say that I was not surprised by the fact
that it was a Assistant District Attorney by the name of MacDonald that was
so willing to make false allegations in order to have me sent to jail
without bail to have my head examined.
It has always been hard times for an honest man in the Maritimes and
everywhere else. However the most obvious example that I can present of how
bad the corruption and conspiracy is within the Church, State and Justice
System occurred on Sept 17/02. On the same day that Michael J. Sullivan the
US Attorney filed his malicious EX PARTE Motion to Dismiss Charles J.
Kickham Jr. signed a new will leaving one hundred and fifty grand to the
Jesuits at Holy Cross no doubt as a form of modern day dispensation to pay
for the incompetant actions of the Rogers Law firm in their defense of
Cardinal Law in my complaint. Everybody must have had a heart attack when
they filed answer to a complaint that the Cardinal had already been
fraudulently removed from. It was a small wonder to me that O’Malley fired
them as soon as he got his new job as Bishop. Only thing was he hired Mr.
Hannigan of the Ropes and Gray Law Firm.
Mr. Caner of the same firm as Hannigan was involved in the SEC cover
up of the Brookline Savings Bank and Putnam Investments Securities
Fraud. O’Malley’s
ex Banker turned priest secretary should have better informed him of my
actions against his own relatives. This truly is a comic tragedy of huge
proportions. Although murky and complicated, the conspiracy is also very
easy for ordinary people to understand. That is why the courts have done
their best to keep me away from a jury. As soon as I introduced the fact
that I had many wiretap tapes about unrelated matters that irrefutably
proves that Federal Law Enforcement is full of Rampant Corruption. The FEDS
tried their worst and I was lucky enough to meet a few honest people within
the system. Now the crooks do not know who to trust and have no idea what to
do now except kill me. They know I won’t quit and cannot be bought off. They
also know that if someone does kill me that I have taken the proper steps to
make matters get worse not better. They cannot get us all. Now you folks
know the truth too. It is high time that the truth is revealed for the
benefit of all. Why not side with me after you check my work? You have
nothing to lose and our children have the world to regain from the Masters
of War.
You may rest assured that I cannot wait until the Pig Farming lawyer,
Frank McKenna that grew up down the road from my Bike Shop makes his
appearance in Washington. I have a few bones to pick with that sly dog. He
is not a bit bigger or smarter than me. He does have many powerful and
crooked acquaintances but there is no honour amongst thieves. Frankly likely
has far fewer friends that I that he can really trust. Most of my true
friends are as poor as church mice or are in debt to their eyeballs. They
stand with me to protect our rights and personal freedom out of mutual love
and respect for each other rather than pocket book defensive actions of the
wealthy men that surround Frank Boy and his cohorts that promote his own
propaganda. He ain’t fooling Maritimers. Why do you think the good folks of
New Brunswick swept the liberals out of power right after Franky Boy quit?
No doubt Bernard Lord is considering not running again right now after the
results of his long delayed by election. The only crook that made out there
was the turncoat, Bernard Richard. Ask John Herron what we think of
turncoats. If he had been ethical he should have ran as an independent. At
least he would have lost with his pride intact like I did. We all know what
a scumbag Franky Boy really is. Paul Martin in order to suit his own crooked
ends was not so wise to pick him to go to Washington. Although he will fit
in well with the other snakes in Washington, he will eat his own tail if it
furthers his own ends. Everybody thinks that he wants Martin’s job but in my
opinion he is being groomed to replace the aging and very evil Maurice
Strong. He is by far more well connected than Chucky Kickham once was and a
thousand times more ruthless if that is possible. I will use Chucky’s bad
acts to expose Franky’s failings because I consider him to be a very
dangerous threat to the future of Canada. Check his work and watch him
closely.
The Yankees are making noises about Drafting people again. As a man
who is raising a fourteen year old son to hate war I will not hesitate to
move him to save haven in my native land. Ask David Lutz the Yankee
Carpetbagger and a friend of Franky’s why I think this way. One of Franky’s
first jobs as Ambassador may be to insure my son’s birthright. That said I
must do my best that Canada remains an independent sovereign nation worth
living in and defending.
All that said Franky Boy and I will have lots to argue about on how
the Canadian Consulate treated me and protected my freedom while I was in a
Boston jail held under the charges of "other" by a Sheriff that had
supported fraud and perjury against me in a federal court. First I must I
ask him why he failed to answer the same letter I composed on Canada Day
that Brad Green was so quick to answer. That one should bring a comical
response to start things off in a proper manner. I choked laughing when I
read how Franky courted the blessings of B'nai B'rith Boys and the Bell
Canada doings after B'nai B'rith had condemned Martin’s last choice of for
an ambassador and Bell Canada had shown me their ass. Hopefully Franky boy
and I shall display to the world how pigheaded Maritmers truly are when we
butt heads. We are both from the same point on the planet but are worlds
apart as men. It should be quite a hoedown particularly after Premiers
Williams and Hamm just displayed their Maritime willingness to fight.
Maybe the rest of the world will finally realize just how important
the Maritimes truly is in world affairs EH? It constantly amazed me why no
one wondered why nominds such a Bernard Lord and Frank McKenna were invited
to Bilderberger’s meetings and why everybody wants to golf and fish with men
I wouldn’t cross the street to talk to. To see evil men like T. Alex Hickman
and Lord Beaverbrook honoured should raise the flag of contempt of any
honest hard working Maritimer. It is them I am speaking for. Get it?
I consider myself to be a very powerful friend of honest people and a
very formidable foe for any crook. IF a man is measured by the strength and
number of his enemies then I can easily support that thinking and I agree
with Kipling in his poem labeled IF and I strongly disagree with Dostoevsky’s
attempt to defend the actions of the evil Grand Inquisitors of old. I would
dearly love to debate Paul L. Locatelli, SJ about his teachings and opinions
but would prefer to argue his legal counsel John Ottoboni or anyone else in
front of a jury of my peers first. What do you think should I send these
Italian dudes the same copy of the wiretap tape I just sent you? The
Commissioner of the RCMP and his General Counsel should have listened to the
tapes before he taught another Italian Catholic lawyer Argeo P. Cellucci how
to ride a horse in Ottawa so he would not appear to be the horse’s ass that
he is during the parade for the Calgary Stampede. Mr. Kubitz you may have
attended the Parade what did you think of the Yankee US Ambassador Argeo’s
performance on a horse? Was the picture the same whether he was coming or
going. A horse’s ass by any other name still smells the same. I pity the
poor bastard that has to come along and clean up after him.
What do ya think should I chuck Argeo in bed with Franky Boy as soon
as Bush appoints a new Ambassador to Canada? A blind man can see that Argeo
has worn out his welcome just current ambassador Michael Kergin the lame
duck in Washington has. That bastard certainly wasn’t around when I needed
him and Franky will do no better.
By the way before I go did everybody think I didn’t know that
Chucky graduated from the same class at Harvard the Redstone did? I died
laughing when Redstone endorsed Bush at Mulroney’s CEO party in China at the
same time his man Dan Rather was being hung out to dry. The fact that
Redstone hired one of the very people I sued along with Cardinal Law to
check Viacom’s ethics is simply too funny for words right now. I will let
you figure out who he is. Another thing thing that really pissed me off was
the fact that a Canadian Company, McGraw Hill partied with Accenture in the
Big Apple while I sat in jail in Beantown. Ask them or Brian Mulroney or
William Cohen or Cendant Corp or Bill Gates why. I ain’t telling I will
explain it in court but rest assured Sun Life and Bell Canada are very
nervous campers about my actions in the USA. Ask Robert C. Pozen.
In conclusion I ask that you all review Mr. Kubitz’s words, check my
work closely and realize you have just encountered a rather unusual
political animal that has no fear of litigation. Whether you believe me or
not it is no matter to me. As I said to Mr. Kubitz you now have my fair
warning that I am about to raise some Hell. I have no doubt the Black Pope
will be curing my name at the Black Mass tonight. He can pray to his god for
help as he enters into a war of words with a man that stands alone. Wanna
bet he will not argue me Pro Se? Would you like to take bets on my life
expectancy? I feel lucky. Do you? Many times in my life I have bet my ass on
my actions? Have you? I am a seasoned veteran in dicey situations. Are you?
Why not just act honestly speak the truth and let the cards fall where they
may? Otherwise we all lose and the bad bastards win again. I am sick of it.
Aren’t you? I simply don’t care about anyone political standing on any
matter as long as it is backed by ethical consideration. Democracy is the
ethical argument. The majority rules after people worthy of the Public Trust
properly speaking for the people they were elected to represent argue the
merits of all sides. The interests of the wealthy should consist of less
that five percent of any vote not all of every vote simply because they
funded the representative’s rise to power. What reason did the Yankees give
for rebelling from our Monarchy? No Taxation without proper representation?
Well? Act like ethical Religious lawyers and speak up goddamnit!!!
Mr. Kubitz your words are as follows.
"A decade or so later, pre-election polls predicted the Conservative Party
might win the June 28, 2004 Federal election. The Party came close. To the
disappointment of many conservative Christians, the cost of this electoral
popularity was a retreat from politically unpalatable beliefs regarding
abortion and same-sex marriage. If some commentators are correct, it appears
that the prevailing current social morality of Canadians is founded on
individual self-fulfillment and tolerance. But the good news is that the
widely-regarded myth of a "Christian North America" has been shattered.
Christians now realize that we no longer live in a "Christian" society. The
naive blinders are off. What is God's agenda for Christians in a political
sense? My thesis is that God's agenda always has been, and continues to be,
an agenda of being salt and light in every arena of endeavour (including
politics, the judiciary, and even the organized church), the betterment of
what can be bettered in society, and the attainment of eternal life for as
many as are called and who accept His message."
I think your thesis sucks but I recognize your right to speak of it
and I am jealous of your connections that allow your to spread your words.
At least I did you the honour of recognizing your work and inserting it in
mine. I dare you to do the same with me. In rebuttal to your theory on your
god’s agenda I believe his agenda comes from the minds of men to suit their
own ends. I say your lament should fall on deaf ears. Our Society clearly
mandates that we keep the state, the courts and the church separate for the
obvious reason that a religious political lawyer would want it changed. Why
must our society abide by your Christian beliefs and standards as long as we
all abide by the golden rule and our own conscience. You must agree that
Shakespeare made a pretty good point about being true to yourself and then
what surely follows. My question to any pious person that reads this can be
found in Matthew 16:26. Methinks your god asked the question. My answer is
simple. Nothing. However being the self confessed. Righteous feeling dude
that I am, I must quote the Psalm 37:16 of another David because I agree
with him not you. "a little that a righteous man hath is better than the
riches of many wicked." Can you tell I am having fun with this shit? Do you
think it will make the Black Pope who is having a party right now as pissed
off as I am? If so, then I will have done some good. I don’t care if any
lawyer admits it just as long as they argue me. I am so afraid that they
will drop the charges against me and I will lose my long awaited jury of my
peers, I must keep the bastards upset or die trying.
Whereas everything in the supposed Heaven and Hell is purportedly done
in threes. I have faxed, emailed and sent this document by mail or courier
to the Superior General and many of his cohorts the best way I know how. He
can never say he has never heard of me and my beefs against him. If ever we
meet the first question I will ask him is whether or not it is true what I
heard about the other guy he hangs around with that is dressed in white and
what he sold in World War II before he became a priest. Maybe I will get to
ask the famous Canadian lawyers Doug Christie or Ian Hanomansing first. They
implied that my friend Byron Prior is a liar. They are the ones in the wrong
not him. the following is an email exchange between Rob Moore and I before I
came home to run for Parliament. Look how many people in Parliament were
well aware of some of the reasons the reasons for my homecomings.
Enough is enough Count Peter-Hans Kolvenbach quite messing around
and sending your small fry after me and torturing my kin. It is high noon
somewhere on this planet. Skitter scatter lets get at her. Do your worst or
get honest. You chose. We both ain't getting any younger. It is high time we
argue. I will wager that I will sue you first or die trying. What say you?
Wanna bet?
Cya’ll in
CourtJ
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave
Milton MA. 02186
I write a lot too.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Eric Brame <eric.brame@knights.ucf.edu>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 22:25:58 -0400
Subject: RE: I just called all of you here is the email as promised to
those who picked up the phone
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Cc: Keith Thompson <keith_thompson09@hotmail.com>
Greetings Mr. Amos,
WWII was not a religious war unless you account for the occultism of
Nazism which is linked to the Theosophical Society through Lucis Trust
(Reference Running God's Plan by Foster Bailey, pp. 15). That is the
only World War that can be called a religious war. The war you speak
of is from a secular country, not a Christian Country. If you do not
apply the historical method please do not e-mail me. You have to show
me why the war is religious. You also have to show why the Bush family
is yoked-up with occultists and why a Bush would go to Bohemian Grove
when that is clearly condemned by the scripture (Both Tanach and New
Testament). Secondly, I am explained that Literary History is my
field. Please show me using New Criticism overlapping with New
Historicism how the New Testament promotes any kind of physical war.
Secondly, please remain respectful in the e-mails you sent me as this
is a University account, not a personal account. If you send me
anymore disrespectful e-mails I will forward this to the University
administration for further action. Thank you!
God Bless,
Eric M. Brame, A.A.
University of Central Florida
English Literature Major
Judaic Studies Minor
History Researcher
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 22:35:54 -0300
Subject: One more thing Mr Brame this is the one dude who has the
legal power to arrest Obama ask yourself why he and the Jesuits are
checking my work today
To: paulzed@zed.ca, Keith_Thompson09@hotmail.com,
eric.brame@knights.ucf.edu, bcc@rcav.bc.ca, editor@tribunenb.ca,
moniteur@rogers.com, tnf@nbnet.nb.ca, editor@catholicregister.org,
drcarley <drcarley@gmail.com>, Sheldon Day <gem3intucson@q.com>
Cc: Barry Winters <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, dean Ray
<deanr0032@hotmail.com>, "Dean.Buzza" <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
dean <dean@law.ualberta.ca>, robin reid <zorroboy2009@hotmail.com>,
tony <tony@peoplestandup.ca>
Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 11,739
Domain Name senate.gov ? (U.S. Government)
IP Address 156.33.90.# (U.S. Senate Sergeant at Arms)
ISP U.S. Senate Sergeant at Arms
Location Continent : North America
Country : United States (Facts)
State : Maryland
City : Annapolis
Lat/Long : 38.9861, -76.5137 (Map)
Language English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinNT
Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.0; Trident/4.0; SLCC1;
.NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR
3.0.30729)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1680 x 1050
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Aug 24 2010 1:07:36 pm
Last Page View Aug 24 2010 1:18:15 pm
Visit Length 10 minutes 39 seconds
Page Views 4
Referring URL http://www.google.co...i=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=
Search Engine google.com
Search Words "nobody will say my name"
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...-stewart-and-me.html
Out Click View my complete profile
http://www.blogger.c...15428735081915360609
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Aug 24 2010 12:07:36 pm
Visit Number 11,739
Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 11,741
Domain Name i95.net ? (Network)
IP Address 208.118.160.# (Allied Telecom Group, LLC)
ISP Allied Telecom Group, LLC
Location Continent : North America
Country : United States (Facts)
State : District of Columbia
City : Washington
Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
Language English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinNT
Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.0; Trident/4.0;
GTB6.5; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 3.5.30729;
.NET CLR 3.0.30729; OfficeLiveConnector.1.5; OfficeLivePatch.1.3;
.NET4.0C)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1680 x 1050
Color Depth : 16 bits
Time of Visit Aug 24 2010 3:12:56 pm
Last Page View Aug 24 2010 3:12:56 pm
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://www.google.co...m1&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=
Search Engine google.com
Search Words "tsmolich@jesuit.org"
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...3/ides-of-march.html
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...3/ides-of-march.html
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Aug 24 2010 2:12:56 pm
Visit Number 11,741
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 22:25:38 -0300
Subject: Re: I just called all of you here is the email as promised to
those who picked up the phone
To: Eric Brame <eric.brame@knights.ucf.edu>
Check your own history. I did succeed in the american courts against
such opponents as Cardinal Bernard Francis Law before crazy Yankees
tried to take me to Cuba in 2003 just before your second religious war
in this century started. Now I will take on the Protector of the Faith
of the Church of England in her court in my nativeland while running
for public office for the fifth time
----- Original Message -----
From: Eric Brame
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Cc: Keith Thompson
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 9:10 PM
Subject: RE: I just called all of you here is the email as promised to those
who picked up the phone
Greetings Mr. Amos,
I have read through some of your material. At this time I regret to inform
you that I am not a scholar of Law and less so of International law. My
specialty is Occult Literary History. I don't know what you desire from me
at this time. Hopefully, if your argument is righteous, that you fully
succeed in the courts if that is what the documents entail. If you need a
lawyer, check out the Christian Lawyer's Union which should assist you.
At this time I am extremly busy in the academic field and working on four
major documents. If you need help in the realm of Literary History in
relation to the area of Christian and Judaic literature, I will be able to
help you greatly. I apologize for not being of any more help.
God Bless!
Eric M. Brame, A.A.
University of Central Florida
English Literature Major
Judaic Studies Minor
History Researcher
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
To: "paulzed" <paulzed@zed.ca>; <Keith_Thompson09@hotmail.com>;
<eric.brame@knights.ucf.edu>
Cc: <bcc@rcav.bc.ca>; <editor@tribunenb.ca>; <moniteur@rogers.com>;
<tnf@nbnet.nb.ca>; <editor@catholicregister.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 7:06 PM
Subject: I just called all of you here is the email as promised to those who
picked up the phone
Perhaps Keith Thompson or Eric Brame should call me (902 800 0369) or
send me their phone numbers?
All the Catholics are trying to ignore me as usual so say Hoka Hey to
Cardinal Bernard Francis Law, the nasty old priest Bill Elliot in
Saint John and Henrik Tonning for me sometime will ya Paul Zed?
Clearly your blogger buddy Chucky's Leblanc's rumours of my demise are
not true EH? Everybody and his dog knows I am to mean to die N'esy
Pas Franky Boy McKenna?
Jim O’Leary, publisher and editor
The Catholic Register
416-934-3410
editor@catholicregister.org
Paul Schratz, editor
The B.C. Catholic
604-683-0281
bcc@rcav.bc.ca
New Freeman
1 Bayard Drive
Saint John New Brunswick E2L 3L5
Phone (506) 653-6806
E-mail tnf@nbnet.nb.ca
Language English
Contact Margie Trafton
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:58:32 -0300
Subject: I just called Acadie Nouvelle AGAIN and asked them about my
right to privacy and why they do not respond to my emails while I run
for public office
To: "philippe.murat" <philippe.murat@acadienouvelle.com>,
nouvelle@acadienouvelle.com, danfour <danfour@myginch.com>,
advocacycollective <advocacycollective@yahoo.com>
Cc: "Byrne. G" <Byrne.G@parl.gc.ca>, "Bernard.Richard"
<Bernard.Richard@gnb.ca>, "oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
"Jeannot.VOLPE@gnb.ca" <Jeannot.VOLPE@gnb.ca>
This nonsense about secretive pension money with Greggy Byrne whining
and crying is truly funny. That corrupt lawyer should know that the
public are entitled to know such things. Jeannot Volpe on the other
hand was one of the secretive MLAs who illegally banished me from the
the LEG while i was ruing in the election of the 38th Parliament and
LONG BEFORE that liberal lawyer was ever reeelected the sick part is
the mindless Ombudsman and his blogging buddy Chucky Leblanc knew
everthing two years before that nasty french man was banished from the
Old Maison as well
FREDERICTON - Finance Minister Greg Byrne asked the Ombudsman to
investigate an "apparent violation of the Act on the Protection of
Personal Information in connection with documents submitted Tuesday to
the media about the pension paid to Jacqueline Robichaud, the widow of
former Prime Minister Louis J. Robichaud. Robichaud.
C'est par lettre que le ministre a répondu, hier, à l'ultimatum de
Jeannot Volpé qui sommait le gouvernement Graham de s'expliquer dans
ce dossier avant la fin de la journée de mercredi. That by letter that
the Minister responded yesterday to the ultimatum that Volpé summoned
the Graham government to explain in this issue before the end of the
day Wednesday. La missive n'y va pas par quatre chemins pour signifier
à l'ancien ministre conservateur qu'il aurait dû faire ses devoirs
avant de convoquer la presse parlementaire au sujet de la pension en
question. The letter does not beat around the bush to serve on the
former Conservative cabinet minister he should have done his homework
before calling parliamentary press about the pension.
Le document explique les raisons et la façon dont on a résolu
l'impasse qui empêchait le versement d'une prestation de conjoint
survivant à Mme Robichaud. The document explains why and how you
resolved the deadlock that prevented the payment of a survivor's
benefit to Ms. Robichaud. Il précise qu'il a été décidé de donner au
Conseil de gestion le pouvoir d'étudier au cas par cas les demandes de
pension. He said it was decided to give the Board of Management the
authority to consider on a case by case pension claims. Les détails de
ces décisions ne sont pas rendus publics afin de protéger la vie
privée des Néo-Brunswickois. The details of these decisions are not
made public to protect the privacy of New Brunswickers.
M. Byrne termine en écrivant qu'il demandera à l'ombudsman Bernard
Richard d'enquêter, puisqu'il croit que M. Volpé aurait divulgué
illégalement de l'information confidentielle. Mr. Byrne concluded by
saying that he will ask the ombudsman Bernard Richard to investigate,
since he believes that Mr. Volpe had illegally disclosed confidential
information.
De son côté, Jeannot Volpé persiste que les choses n'ont pas été
faites selon les règles. For its part, Jeannot Volpe persists that
things were not done according to the rules. Il soutient que même si
le Conseil de gestion pouvait décider d'accorder une dérogation à Mme
Robichaud, il fallait tout de même que cette décision fasse l'objet
d'un arrêté en Conseil (des ministres). He argues that even if the
Management Board could decide to grant a waiver to Ms. Robichaud, it
was still that this decision be an Order in Council (Cabinet).
http://translate.google.ca/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=http://www.capacadie.com/actualites-regionales/2010/8/19/les-liberaux-ripostent&ei=MuJzTLubLsL6lwf52fzHCA&sa=X&oi=translate&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBcQ7gEwAA&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dphilippe.murat%2540acadienouvelle.com%26hl%3Den%26rls%3Dcom.microsoft:en-ca:IE-SearchBox%26rlz%3D1I7GFRE_en
But are you still laughing at me Chucky Leblanc
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/07/feds-institutionalize-determined-nb.html
http://charlesotherpersonality.blogspot.com/2008/07/david-amos-picked-up-by-rcmp.html
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 20:56:25 -0300
Subject: Hey Jennifer Warren of the CIBC formerly of Rogers say Hoka
Hey for me to PANB and their pal David Hay formerly of Merrill Lynch
and NBPOWER will ya?
To: "philippe.murat" <philippe.murat@acadienouvelle.com>, "jennifer.
warren" <jennifer.warren@cibc.com>, fundytides <fundytides@gmail.com>,
"scott. agnew" <scott.agnew@canadaeast.com>, h.davies@lse.ac.uk,
"George. Bentley" <George.Bentley@fin.gc.ca>,
desautels@telfer.uottawa.ca, phogg@osgoode.yorku.ca,
joan.monahan@fin.gc.ca, g.tree@lse.ac.uk, info@telfer.uottawa.ca,
adam.dodek@uottawa.ca, mbehiel@uottawa.ca, mjackman@uottawa.ca,
president@uottawa.ca, bmiazga@uottawa.ca, dawn.russell@dal.ca,
DAmirault@bankofcanada.ca, MCarney@bankofcanada.ca,
tsalman@salmanpartners.com, ZLalani@bankofcanada.ca, "victor.
boudreau2" <victor.boudreau2@gnb.ca>, editor
<editor@sylvanlakenews.com>, dean Ray <deanr0032@hotmail.com>, dean
<dean@law.ualberta.ca>, "john. conyers" <John.Conyers@mail.house.gov>,
carlbainbridge <carlbainbridge@panb.org>, "carl. davies"
<carl.davies@gnb.ca>, krisaustin <krisaustin@panb.org>,
"Keith.ASHFIELD@gnb.ca" <Keith.ASHFIELD@gnb.ca>, Jason Keenan
<jason.keenan@icann.org>, "jack. keir" <jack.keir@gnb.ca>,
"Jody.CARR@gnb.ca" <Jody.CARR@gnb.ca>
Cc: jacqueline.meere@jpmorgan.com, JPMCinvestorrelations@jpmchase.com,
joseph.evangelisti@jpmchase.com, paul.hartwick@chase.com,
lauren.m.francis@jpmorgan.com, brian.j.marchiony@jpmorgan.com,
stephen.m.cutler@jpmorgan.com
I bet you Bankters and Stevey Boy Harper rmember the document that
came with this letter long before th economy took a nosedive EH lady?
Sdo ya care to recall why I am pissed at Merrill Lynch, David Hay and
all the media people you used to work with? The pdf files hereto
attached should jog any crooked lawyer's memory particularly when
their name is on them. N'esy Pas Arty Baby MacKay and Carl Bainbridge?
http://davidamos.blogspot.com/2006/05/harper-and-bankers.html
Former New Brunswick Power boss joins CIBC
.Barry Critchley August 19, 2010 – 1:03 pm
David Hay, the former president and chief executive at New Brunswick
Power Holding Corp, is joining CIBC World Markets as a vice-chairman
in the firm’s investment banking group.
Hay starts after Labour Day and will have senior coverage
responsibilities for the bank’s major corporate clients in Canada.
Hay spent about six years at NB Power. Prior to that he spent about a
decade working with Merrill Lynch in both London and Canada.
Read more:
http://business.financialpost.com/2010/08/19/former-new-brunswick-power-boss-joins-cibc/#ixzz0xHo04Wf9
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:55:36 -0300
Subject: The unethical reporters within Acadie Nouvelle and their pals
in the Irving media are just as funny as the CBC are sometimes N'esy
Pas Kelly Lamrock?
To: philippe.murat@acadienouvelle.com.com, "kelly. lamrock"
<kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca>, llewellyn.stephen@dailygleaner.com,
"oldmaison. wcie" <oldmaison.wcie@gmail.com>, mail@ccla.org,
office@fairvote.ca, dwatch@web.net
Cc: artmackay <artmackay@savenbpower.org>, SterlingWright
<SterlingWright@panb.org>, "David.ALWARD@gnb.ca"
<David.ALWARD@gnb.ca>, sophia@themanproductions.com
http://www.democracyfornb.com/en/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:18:04 -0300
Subject: Attn Commissioner Ian McPhail QC I called again and tried to
speak to you twice today my number is 902 800 0369
To: Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, toewsv1
<toewsv1@mts.net>, danfour <danfour@myginch.com>
Cc: nelson.kalil@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, rmordenassoc
<rmordenassoc@rogers.com>, "warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca"
<warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, warren <warren@daisygroup.ca>,
"warren.dosko" <warren.dosko@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Paulette.
Delaney-Smith" <Paulette.Delaney-Smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, WaterWarCrimes
<waterwarcrimes@gmail.com>, robin reid <zorroboy2009@hotmail.com>,
tony <tony@peoplestandup.ca>, "Ken.Zielke" <Ken.Zielke@gov.ab.ca>
http://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca/nrm/nr/2010/20100126-eng.aspx
As I said I am very serious and have no wish to speak to the likes of
Ms Leduc EVER again FYI I see that the gossip about my concerns is
leaking out here there an everywhere following this note is just
couple of the reasons why I called an tried hard to speak to you again
today
Please don't try to tell me that your office does not know what
happened between the RCMP and I within weeks of my sending the email
immedialy below this note.
If perhaps you people should read some blogs an watch some YOUTUBES ASAP?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
http://charlesotherpersonality.blogspot.com/2008/07/david-amos-picked-up-by-rcmp.html
http://govinjustice.blogspot.com/2008/07/david-amos-picked-up-by-rcmp.html
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/07/feds-institutionalize-determined-nb.html
http://www.leadershipdirectories.com/images/promo/FTC.pdf
QSLS Politics
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 15,116
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 164.62.7.# (Federal Trade Commission)
ISP Federal Trade Commission
Location Continent : North America
Country : United States (Facts)
State : District of Columbia
City : Washington
Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
Language English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 7.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727;
.NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1920 x 1200
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Aug 18 2010 1:50:29 pm
Last Page View Aug 18 2010 2:01:49 pm
Visit Length 11 minutes 20 seconds
Page Views 2
Referring URL http://www.google.co...i=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=
Search Engine google.com
Search Words "david amos" canada parliament
Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....eblower-part-1b.html
Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....eblower-part-1b.html
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Aug 18 2010 7:50:29 am
Visit Number 15,116
Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 11,630
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 199.212.215.# (DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE)
ISP DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Location Continent : North America
Country : Canada (Facts)
State/Region : Ontario
City : Ottawa
Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
Language English (Canada)en-ca
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Aug 13 2010 12:50:37 pm
Last Page View Aug 13 2010 12:52:15 pm
Visit Length 1 minute 38 seconds
Page Views 7
Referring URL
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...04/just-dave_22.html
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...3/ides-of-march.html
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-8:00
Visitor's Time Aug 13 2010 8:50:37 am
Visit Number 11,630
Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 11,638
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 199.212.150.# (Royal Canadian Mounted Police)
ISP Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Location Continent : North America
Country : Canada (Facts)
State/Region : Ontario
City : Ottawa
Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
Language English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 6.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1;
INFOWEB-APPROVED; INFOWEB-APPROVED-IE6-FR; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR
2.0.50727; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Aug 13 2010 5:52:40 pm
Last Page View Aug 13 2010 5:52:40 pm
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://www.blogger.c...15428735081915360609
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Aug 13 2010 4:52:40 pm
Visit Number 11,638
Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 11,639
Domain Name (Unknown)
IP Address 199.212.215.# (DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE)
ISP DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Location Continent : North America
Country : Canada (Facts)
State/Region : Ontario
City : Ottawa
Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
Language English (Canada) en-ca
Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1466 x 916
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Aug 13 2010 5:52:51 pm
Last Page View Aug 13 2010 5:52:51 pm
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...04/just-dave_22.html
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...04/just-dave_22.html
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-8:00
Visitor's Time Aug 13 2010 1:52:51 pm
Visit Number 11,639
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:34:30 -0300
Subject: Attn PAULINE PHILIBERT and ARNOLD HADLEY of the New Brunswick
Police Commission
To: nbpc@gnb.ca, arnold.hadley@gnb.ca, john.foran@gnb.ca,
premier@gnb.ca, Jeannot.VOLPE@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
Wayne.STEEVES@gnb.ca
Cc: webo@xplornet.com
New Brunswick Police Commission
435 King Street
Fredericton, New Brunswick
E3B 1E5
A letter to support my complaint about various police forces in New
Brunswick will follow these emails just as I promised on the phone to
you people today.
I have no understanding as to why the Police Commission nor anyone
else holding a governmental mandate in the Province of New Brunswick
has never called me back or answered one email in nearly four years.
Shawn Graham should at least recognize his own documents to my framer
friend, Werner Bock from the time when he sat in opposition and was
the agricutural critic at the same time .
It appears to me that I am not the only one to get mad at the
malicious incompetence of John Foran and the cops of New Brunswick.
What is even more interesting though is the fact that John Foran was
once mad at the Police Commission and they way they investigated
things so secretly against the public's best interests. EH Mr. Volpe?
Rest assured that I ain't holding my breath for the police to continue
to harass me anymore after their nonsense yesterday. Nor will I wait
to see Wayne Steeves say or do the right thing after he has covered up
my concerns about the severe lack of police integrity for his politcal
party's benefit for four god damned years.
http://www.canlii.org/eliisa/highlight.do?text=JOHN+FORAN+WILSON+MacINTOSH&language=en&searchTitle=Search+all+CanLII+Databases&path=/en/nb/nbqb/doc/1995/1995canlii3862/1995canlii3862.html
For the recod these Youtubes that are this arseholes favoutites were
created by the RCMP and I have no doubt whatsoever the people
slandering me are cops as well.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0NdNtvC-YI#GU5U2spHI_4
http://www.youtube.com/user/bigolcanoworms
At least his ID is correct. This is a big old can of worms. N'est Pas?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:26:28 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Perhaps Paul Kennedy the current Commissioner of Public
Complaints Against the RCMP will call us back now EH?
To: info.legal@moncton.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:17:05 -0300
Subject: Perhaps Paul Kennedy the current Commissioner of Public
Complaints Against the RCMP will call us back now EH?
To: Hermenegilde.Chiasson@gnb.ca, Dion.S@parl.gc.ca,
scotta@parl.gc.ca, Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca, Holland.M@parl.gc.ca,
Hubbard.C@parl.gc.ca, jonesr@cbc.ca, nbombud@gnb.ca,
Ed.Doherty@gnb.ca, T.J.Burke@gnb.ca, roly.macintyre@gnb.ca,
aleblanc.mla@nb.aibn.com, eugene.mcginley2@gnb.ca, brian.kenny@gnb.ca,
roy.boudreau@gnb.ca, donald.arseneault@gnb.ca, danf@danf.net,
injusticecoalition@hotmail.com, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
stuart.jamieson@gnb.ca, Margaret-Ann.BLANEY@gnb.ca,
victor.boudreau@gnb.ca, rick.brewer@gnb.ca,
John.Ferguson@saintjohn.ca, Ivan.Court@saintjohn.ca
Cc: complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, nouvelle@acadienouvelle.com,
newsroom@nbpub.com, carl.davies@gnb.ca, janet.trail@gnb.ca,
Akoschany@ctv.ca, jtravers@thestar.ca, alan_white@cbc.ca,
Tim.Porter@gnb.ca, Trevor.HOLDER@gnb.ca, bev.harrison@gnb.ca,
Wayne.STEEVES@gnb.ca, Jody.CARR@gnb.ca, Keith.ASHFIELD@gnb.ca,
David.ALWARD@gnb.ca, bruce.noble@fredericton.ca,
lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 13:36:41 -0400
From: "PCC Complaints" complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
May 23, 2007
File No. PC-2005-1291
Mr. David R Amos
motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Dear Mr. Amos:
On a number of occasions you have called or sent e-mails our office to
raise matters which are of pressing concern to you.
Each time we have tried to respond by explaining to you the relatively
narrow mandate of this Commission and the limits of our powers to deal
with the matters which are of concern to you. I must stress, once
again, that the purpose of this Commission is to provide the public
with an opportunity to make complaints concerning the conduct of
members of the RCMP in the performance of their duties. We have
neither the expertise nor the legal authority to permit us to become
involved in issues beyond the scope of this mandate.
While it is clearly not the intention of the Commission to prevent you
from making complaints against members of the RCMP, an analysis of
your numerous contacts with the Commission indicates that your
concerns fall well outside the confines of our mandate. Further, your
frequent e-mails have been disruptive and unproductive for both you
and for the staff of this office.
Should you determine that some point in the future you have a
complaint concerning the conduct of a member of the RCMP in the
performance of his or her duties, please submit it to the Commission
by Canada Post only. As of now, your e-mails will be deleted unread.
Yours truly,
Andrée Leduc
Enquiries and Complaints Analyst
Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Say hey to Shawn Murphy for me will ya
Brian?
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 15:25:45 -0400
From: "REVIEWS" reviews@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
The Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP has received
your e-mail message and will be responding in due course.
La Commission des plaintes du public contre la GRC a reçu votre
courriel et vous rendra une réponse au moment opportun.
Subject:
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
January 30, 2007
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Mr. David Amos
Dear Mr. Amos:
This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
Graham of the RCMP "J" Division in Fredericton.
Sincerely,
Honourable Michael B. Murphy
Minister of Health
CM/cb
Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,
John.Foran@gnb.ca, Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,
"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
"Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have n
Dear Mr. Amos,
Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off over
the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I was not
ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear that
Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada and the
US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment policing in
Petitcodiac, NB.
It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
Sincerely,
Warren McBeath, Cpl.
GRC Caledonia RCMP
Traffic Services NCO
Ph: (506) 387-2222
Fax: (506) 387-4622
E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:25:33 -0300
Subject: Fwd: I have never met Mr. Baker it was Shawn Graham who I met
in person in June of 2006
To: john.foran@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca,
greg.byrne@gnb.ca, Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca, mary.schryer@gnb.ca,
rick.miles@gnb.ca, jack.keir@gnb.ca, Bernard.LeBlanc@gnb.ca,
news@kingscorecord.com, news@dailygleaner.com, cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca,
Deb_Nobes@cbc.ca, spinks08@hotmail.com, rwnicholson@rwnicholson.com
Cc: carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, mike.olscamp@gnb.ca,
oldmaison.wcie@gmail.com, porcupine007@gmail.com,
advocacycollective@yahoo.com, Duane.Rousselle@unb.ca,
ndpnpd@nbnet.nb.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: webo@xplornet.com
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:39:45 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: I have never met Mr. Baker it was Shawn Graham who I met in
person in June of 2006
To: Shawn.Graham@gnb.ca, Bernard.Theriault@gnb.ca, Chris.Baker@gnb.ca,
bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, Wally.STILES@gnb.ca
Cc: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com,
Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca,
Day.S@parl.gc.ca, Moore.R@parl.gc.ca
May I suggest that the Premier and the RCMP finally call me back and
then start doing their job? 506 756 8687
http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=WernerBock&p=r
Werner Bock
P.S I bet the politcal lawyer Vic Toews knows a few of these people EH?
Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 11,68
Domain Name gov.mb.ca ? (Canada)
IP Address 205.200.189.# (Government of Manitoba Gold & Silver)
ISP MTS Allstream
Location
Continent North America
Country Canada (Facts)
State/Region Manitoba
City Winnipeg
--- On Wed, 8/18/10, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote:
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Subject: Fwd: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack
of ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before
you people buy much stock in their stock eh?
To: pr@potashcorp.com, Podwika@potashcorp.com,
fosterd@bennettjones.ca, corporate.relations@potashcorp.com,
lgold.blcanada@b-l.com, "shawn. graham" <shawn.graham@gnb.ca>,
"David.ALWARD@gnb.ca" <David.ALWARD@gnb.ca>, "krisaustin"
<krisaustin@panb.org>, jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca,
tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com, nmiller@corridor.ca,
"bruce.northrup@gnb.ca" <bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, atlbf@nb.aibn.com,
akapoor@globeandmail.com, nmacadam@globeandmail.com,
vepp@globeandmail.com, potash@mackenziepartners.com,
contactus@kingsdaleshareholder.com, "rick.hancox"
<rick.hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca>, "Bernard.LeBlanc"
<Bernard.LeBlanc@gnb.ca>, Andre.Liebenberg@bhpbilliton.com,
mclellana@bennettjones.com, "MooreR" <MooreR@parl.gc.ca>, "danfour"
<danfour@myginch.com>, "oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
Brendan.Harris@bhpbilliton.com, "Dean.Buzza"
<Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles. Blinn"
<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: "wcoady" <wcoady@accesswave.ca>, michel.desneiges@sade-els.org,
producers@stu.ca, "WaterWarCrimes" <waterwarcrimes@gmail.com>, "Penny
Bright" <waterpressure@gmail.com>, "tony" <tony@peoplestandup.ca>,
jacques.nasser@bhpbilliton.com
Date: Wednesday, August 18, 2010, 3:36 PM
With ANOTHER election in the near future I see no need to explain my
issues again about theexploitation of our natural resources to a
bunch of sneaky lawyers.(everyboy shoul checkout the pdf hereto
attache) especially our former Deputy Prime Minister Lanslide Annie
McLelllan an the RCMP thought they knew everything seven years ago and
did nothing let alone call me back just like you an your many
conservative cohorts NEVER did EH Brucy Baby Northrup? (902 800 0369
Notice my new contact number? You an the RCMP can forget Werner Bock's
now)
Clearly there is no need for politicians to try to be confidential
with mean old me when the Globe and Mail loves spiling the beans
sometimes ou woul think those unethical journlists woul know that
simple truths spoken amongst common folk about corrupt politicians
have a good habit of coming to the surface sooner or later anyway EH?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
http://www.bennettjones.com/people_item.aspx?person=821
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/potash-corp-soars-bhp-bid-rejected/article1675353/
http://beta.images.theglobeandmail.com/archive/00828/BHPrelease_828561a.pdf
http://www.potashcorp.com/media/POT_2010_Letter_from_BHP_Billiton's_Chairman.pdf
http://www.bhpbilliton.com/bb/aboutUs/companyOverview/ourBoard.jsp
http://www.potashcorp.com/about/management_board/senior_management/podwika/
http://www.corridor.ca/media/2010-press-releases/20100510.html
http://www.bennettjones.com/people_item.aspx?person=712&name=foster&pg=&office=
http://www.robmooremp.com/081908.htm
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new-brunswick/story/2009/05/07/nb-penobsquis-water-lawyer-1056.html?ref=rss
http://www.newbrunswickbeacon.ca/2010/03/risk-and-reward-when-rural-life-meets-economic-development/5666
http://www.vancouverislandwaterwatchcoalition.ca/go456a/FRACKING
http://www.elements.nb.ca/theme/ecojustice/JeanPaul/JeanPaul.htm
http://www.nbmediacoop.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1133:penobsquis-residents-seek-compensation-for-damages&catid=82:environment&Itemid=197
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Subject: Attn Rob Moir I have read some of your work perhaps you
should read something from years ago
To: fundyroyalndp@gmail.com, Moore.R@parl.gc.ca,
jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca,
tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com, Harper.S@parl.gc.ca,
Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, bbixby@burnslev.com,
david@lutz.nb.ca, drosenblatt@burnslev.com,
markwright4mp@politician.com
Cc: fosterd@bennettjones.ca, corporate.relations@potashcorp.com,
lgold.blcanada@b-l.com, fbinhct@leo.gov
Date: Wednesday, April 30, 2008, 9:46 PM
First things first meet Lenny Gold, Dougy Foster and Joey Podwika. You
can be certain that these wicked bastards know exactly who I am and
are no doubt quite nervous that the Feds have not figured out a way to
shut me up yet.
Everybody knows that far away corporate lawyers such as these three
stooges have been making the big score off us dumb Maritimers forever
and a day and have been laughing their nasty arses off at us all the
way to their buddies' bank. They appear to fear only one Maritimer and
that is yours truly. Ask them if I am liar or not as I speak of the
Bank Fraud Tax Fraud, Securities Fraud and Murders that you are afraid
to talk about. Shawn Graham should know everthing he partied hardy
with my G.A.L. Brian Bixby's Law firm in Beantown one year ago and I
effected an introduction with the lawyer Leonard Gold because that
very dumb Maritimer came to Beantown to talk to many evil Yankees ten
times more worldly wise than Shawny Baby ever could be.
Your laments Bobby Baby about lost water really rot my socks. You
should know I covered that base years ago and everybody just ran away
scared. Ask the Minister Larry Cannon why I laughed when he gave out a
little federal gold just before Bernie Lord had the writ dropped in
2006 in the provincial election. It was very telling thing just like
all the money being passed out right now.
I noticed that you and all you NDP pals ignored the fact that I ran in
that election as well as the Fed one and the one in Nova Scotia
earlier that year. Yea I saw you and Pat Hannratty ducking out the
back just as I walked in that night in January of 2006. Why you didn't
answer my friend Jack's letter either spoke to your personal integrity
EH? If Rob Moore or none of the Conservatives on the Hill faraway
won't talk to you just ask the lawyer Smith in Saint John the boss of
the NB Securities Commission if I didn't raise a little Hell while he
filled the other lawyer Nicholson's boots in PUB just long enough to
cram the pipeline through to the trunk while the election was on and I
was intervening in the pipeline matter in Saint John at the same time
and Norm Miller and his lawyer ignored my arguments but read my words
about it all on the web all the same.
Better yet why not have some fun and ask the very strange PCS dudes in
Sussex why they had my photo posted at the gate and the RCMP were to
be called if I made an appearance there while I was running against
your pal John Carty in Fat Fred City. Your clue to their malice is UBS
and another lawyer named Dave Aufhauser whom I have been battling with
for six long years. Do you even know who he is? Rest assured Lenny,
Dougy and Joey do.
Whereas you trust the words of the very malicious CBC or the Irvings
and not mine read what the CBC were saying one year ago. Then read
what the local Irving rag wrote about me four god damned years ago.
For the record Bobby Baby I still remember you commenting on the
trouble I was having with the Feds so that my minor son could return
to the USA to comfort his mother and how little milk of human kindness
you have had in your greedy little PHD soul ever since. Can ya tell I
don't like you not even a little bit?
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new-brunswick/story/2007/03/27/nb-mccullyfield.html
Read on Teacher pay particular attention to my words about oil and
gas.and crossborder public corruption. For the record I have always
considered the water in Penobsquis a federal matter concerning the NEB
and if they ignore me then maybe i would take it up in the Federal
Court. It won't go anywhere though if Maritimers don't finally wise up
start listening to me.
FYI I have started to upload some of my ducument for the public to
view. They can be found here and there will be a great deal more to
follow as my time allows.
http://www.scribd.com/people/view/554842-david-raymond-amos
This Maritimer Danny Boy Fitzgeral who is studying for his PHD in
Holland made several interesting blogs about me as he attacked my
integrity. In the end methinks I may have turned him my way and in
return I left his school out of my battles.
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/03/3rd-part-political-runs-in-maritimes.html
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/03/david-amos-nb-nwo-whistleblower-part-1b.html
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/04/david-amos-nb-nwo-whistleblower-part-2.html
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/04/david-amos-nb-nwo-whistleblower-part-3.html
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/04/canadian-action-party-cap-qsls.html
Perhaps you should study them sometime EH Teacher? You should take
careful notice that college degrees mean less than nothing to me. Just
like any true Maritimer it is fighters, foresters, farmers and
fishermen I admire not rich snots that do not understand the meaning
of hard work. That said it does appear that Danny Boy does work very
hard on his blog. I do know how long such things take and his blog is
a fine and as fancy as anyones and constantly updated. I particularly
apprciate the fact he leaves his comments open without moderation.
Also for the record I signed your Fake Left friends' petition.
Penobsquis Deserves Safe Water
98 Fran Oliver There is no excuse for this situation. A responsible
provincial government and a responsible corporation would never allow
local families to bear the financial and social burden, likely
resulting from a provincial mining operation, while government and
corporation choke on huge profits.
99 David Raymond Amos Ask Garth Moore why my picture is posted at the
gate while I ran for Parliament will ya?
My friends tell me tha the Photo the PCS dudes had posted as some sort
of criminal the RCMP were watching out for was clipped from the pages
of the Kings County Record that contained the following articles.
The following email and two deleted blogs can be found within one
pigheaded Maritimer's blog about government injustice. After the
Irvings had his pal's Chucky Leblanc' former blog wiped out I had to
tease and torture him into doing the right thing and allowing just one
of my comments to stand. Some much for Freedom on Speech on the
Internet when even Maritime bloggers are unethical EH teacher?
For the record only the Gypsy and Danny Boy fitzgerald have allowed
all of my comments to stand the test of time and ethics. Thus far so I
must give credit where credit is due. Your chosen profession such as
it is should at least understand that EH Mr. Moir?
Here is my last post in the blogs tonight. Obviously I do not pretend
to be somebody I am not. N'est Pas?
http://gypsy-blog.blogspot.com/2008/04/from-student-to-city-councillor.html
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
The following email can be found here
http://govinjustice.blogspot.com/2008/04/tjburke-letter-to-me.html
---- Original Message -----
From: "McKnight, Gisele" McKnight.Gisele@kingscorecord.com
To: lcampenella@ledger.com
Cc:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:53 PM
Subject: David Amos
Hello Lisa,
David Amos asked me to contact you. I met him last June after he became
an independent (not representing any political party) candidate in our
federal
election that was held June 28. He was a candidate in our constituency of
Fundy (now called Fundy-Royal).
I wrote a profile story about him, as I did all other candidates. That
story appeared in the Kings County Record June 22. A second story, written
by one of my reporters, appeared on the same date, which was a report on
the candidates' debate held June 18.
As I recall David Amos came last of four candidates in the election.
The winner got 14,997 votes, while Amos got 358.
I have attached the two stories that appeared, as well as a photo
taken by reporter Erin Hatfield during the debate. I couldn't find the photo
that ran, but this one is very similar.
A1-debate A1-amos,David for MP 24.doc debate 2.JPG
Gisele McKnight editor
Kings County Record
Sussex, New Brunswick
Canada
506-433-1070
Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd
By Erin Hatfield
"If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
world is all screwed up, rearrange it."
The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
unofficial, theme song for the debate.
The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.
The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was
organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage
of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record
and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.
Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
other on their answers and criticizing eachothers' party leaders.
Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic
relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's
getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."
Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his
party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but
well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am
on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better
places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters
shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.
The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At
one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in
front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the
voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According to
Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and second
readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted, at
final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to
register sex offenders rather than register the property of law
abiding citizens."
The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and
women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman
yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron
spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.
Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy
Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You're out of touch," Armstrong
yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of
post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged
Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time,
anyplace," Armstrong responded.
As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate,
candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and
fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making
process for the June 28 vote.
Cutline – David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his
favourite possessions—motorcycles.
McKnight/KCR
The Unconventional Candidate
David Amos Isn't Campaigning For Your Vote, But….
By Gisele McKnight
FUNDY—He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."
Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot—David Amos.
The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife
and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from
running for office in Canada.
One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail
to meet Elections Canada requirements.
When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his
favourite place to do so—Fundy.
Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his
dissatisfaction with politicians.
"I've become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he
said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."
The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in
1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he
needed to change his life.
"I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that
sometimes in midlife."
So Amos, who'd lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners
motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952
Panhead motorcycle.
"Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact)
experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you
renew your faith in mankind – you help anyone you can, you never ask
for anything, but you take what they offer."
For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs
and conversation all over North America.
Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son
and a daughter and become a house-husband – Mr. Mom, as he calls
himself.
He also describes himself in far more colourful terms—a motorcyclist
rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed
individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud
Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."
Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his life.
"But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said.
"It's alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"
Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.
"I didn't appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door
interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can
call me. I'm not going to drive my opinions down their throats."
And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.
"I won't take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It's
not about money. It goes against what I'm fighting about."
What he's fighting for is the discussion of issues – tainted blood,
the exploitation of the Maritimes' gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
name a few.
"The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs – fishing,
farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I'm
death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
(NAFTA) out the window.
NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.
Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.
"There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
Don't necessarily vote for me, but vote."
Although…if you're going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have
your X by his name.
"I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and
say, 'what the hell.'"
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:38:35 -0300
Subject: Fwd: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack
of ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before
you people buy much stock in their stock eh?
To: henrybanta <henrybanta@aol.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:47:02 -0300
Subject: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack of
ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before you
people buy much stock in their stock eh?
To: Scott.Espenshade@bhpbilliton.com, ir <ir@potashcorp.com>
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/potash-corp-soars-bhp-bid-rejected/article1675353/
http://beta.images.theglobeandmail.com/archive/00828/BHPrelease_828561a.pdf
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "STAINTON-JAMES, Angela" <STAINTONJAMESA@parliament.uk>
> > To: "'David Amos'" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 5:50 AM
> > Subject: RE: So what is the Conservative MP Hugh Robertson gonna do
> > about people in his riding torturing people on the Internet? In Canada
> > such slander is a crime EH Vic Toews?
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear David
> >
> > Thank you for your e-mail addressed to Hugh Robertson. Your e-mail
> > has come through to Hugh's constituency office when, clearly, you need
> > his Department. Sadly, I do not have an e-mail address for him but
> > the telephone number of the Department of Media Culture and Sport is
> > 020 7211 6200 and they should be able to provide you with the
> > necessary information.
> >
> > Thank you for writing to Hugh and if you have any problem at all
> > please do not hesitate to come back to me.
> >
> > Best wishes
> > Angela Stainton-James
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
> > Sent: 29 May 2010 23:24
> > To: STAINTON-JAMES, Angela; toewsv1
> > Cc: RHar100@aol.com; Gilles. Blinn; gilles.moreau; roger. gillies;
> > rogerduguay21
> > Subject: So what is the Conservative MP Hugh Robertson gonna do about
> > people in his riding torturing people on the Internet? In Canada such
> > slander is a crime EH Vic Toews?
> >
> > Need I say that "Satan's Crack Dealer" and his many evil little fans
> > atacked the wrong pissed of Maritimer in Youtube? Scroll down read
> > real slow and then call your lawyer or the cops Mr Roberson
> >
> > http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=6074892060
> > Richard Coughlan
> > Faversham, United Kingdom
> > email RHar100@aol.com
> > Website:http://youtube.com/user/coughlan666
> > Phone 07935333407
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> > Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 15:46:20 -0300
> > Subject: Mr. Finkelstein I just discovered you and your concerns today
> > perhaps we should have a long talk ASAP? i an be reached at 506 485
> > 2578 for a couple of days
> > To: normfinkelstein@gmail.com
> >
> > Need I say that I am hounoured that this evil person hates me/
> >
> > http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2010/05/americans-have-never-guarantteed.html
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> > Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 14:23:46 -0300
> > Subject: Lets see if the Russians will understand Fwd: We just talked
> > this what I was trying to relate to the President of Mexico while he
> > was in Canada
> > To: info@rusembassy.ca
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> > Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 14:19:51 -0300
> > Subject: We just talked this what I was trying to relate to the
> > President of Mexico while he was in Canada
> > To: atperez_lee <atperez_lee@yahoo.com.mx>
> >
> > The easiest way to check something about my concerns quickly is to go
> > to the US Senate Banking Committee hearing on November 18th and 20th
> > 2003 and notice the webcasts and transcripts of a very important
> > hearing about the financial industry are missing. Please notice the
> > crook Eliot Spitzer testified on the 20th
> >
> > http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.List&Month=0&Year=2003
> >
> >
> > http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=102e41a1-f540-4ce5-a701-b6d09b7606b1
> >
> > http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=90f8e691-9065-4f8c-a465-72722b47e7f2
> >
> > Now look for Spitzer's answer to me on page 13 of this pdf file
> >
> > http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
> >
> > The easy answer to your next question is YES I am the the guy nobody
> > will talk about. so perhaps you should for the benefit of your
> > concerns and pocketbook. (Google David Amos and Wendy Olsen to see how
> > far down the rabbbit hole I can take anyone)
> >
> > I explained some of it a year ago on many talk shows and nobody cared.
> > Listen here if you wish then go figure whom you should trust.
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJGDSlnyKro
> >
> > If nothing else have laugh at my espense and Google this expression
> > "Nobody will say my name"
> >
> >
> > Here is just one of the many reasons why
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 9:21 AM
> > To: David Amos; USANYS-MADOFF; Litt, Marc (USANYS)
> > Cc: webo; vasilescua@sec.gov; friedmani@sec.gov; krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
> > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
> >
> > Thank you for your response.
> >
> > Wendy Olsen
> > Victim Witness Coordinator
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:48 AM
> > To: USANYS-MADOFF; Olsen, Wendy (USANYS); Litt, Marc (USANYS)
> > Cc: webo; vasilescua@sec.gov; friedmani@sec.gov; krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
> > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
> >
> > Ms Olsen
> >
> > Thank you for keeping me informed.
> >
> > Yes unseal all my emails with all their attachments immediately and
> > make certain that the US Attorny's office finally practices full
> > disclosurement as to who I am and what my concerns are as per the Rule
> > of Law within a purported democracy.
> >
> > As you folks all well know I am not a shy man and I have done nothing
> > wrong. It appears to me that bureacratic people only use the right to
> > privacy of others when it suits their malicious ends in order to
> > protect their butts from impreacment, litigation and prosecution.
> >
> > The people in the US Attorney's Office and the SEC etc are very well
> > aware that I protested immediately to everyone I could think of when
> > the instant I knew that my correspondences went under seal and Madoff
> > pled guilty so quickly and yet another cover up involing my actions
> > was under full steam. Everybody knows that.the US Government has been
> > trying to keep my concerns about the rampant public corruption a
> > secret for well over seven long years. However now that a lot of
> > poeple and their countries in general are losing a lot of money people
> > are beginning to remember just exactly who I am and what i did
> > beginning over seven years ago..
> >
> > Veritas Vincit
> > David Raymond Amos
> > 506 756 8687
> >
> > P.S. For the record Obviously I pounced on these Yankee bastards as
> > soon as the newsrag in Boston published this article on the web last
> > night.
> >
> > http://www.bostonherald.com/business/general/view.bg?articleid=1162354&f
> > ormat=&page=2&listingType=biz#articleFull
> >
> > Notice that Nester just like everyone else would not say my name? It
> > is because my issues surrounding both Madoff and are NOT marketing
> > timing They are as you all well know money laundering, fraud,
> > forgery, perjury, securites fraud, tax fraud, Bank fraud, illegal
> > wiretappping and Murder amongst other very serious crimes.
> >
> > "SEC spokesman John Nester dismissed similarities between Markopolos
> > and Scannell's cases as "not a valid comparison."
> >
> > He said the SEC determined the market-timing by Putnam clients that
> > Scannell reported didn't violate federal law. Nester said the SEC only
> > acted after another tipster alleged undisclosed market-timing by some
> > Putnam insiders.
> >
> > Scannell, now a crusader for SEC reforms, isn't surprised the agency
> > is in hot water again.
> >
> > Noting that several top SEC officials have gone on to high-paying
> > private-sector jobs, he believes hopes for future employment impact
> > investigations. "It's a distinct disadvantage to make waves before you
> > enter the private sector," Scannell said."
> >
> > --- On Mon, 3/30/09, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> > Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S
> > OFFICE
> > SDNY
> > To: NesterJ@sec.gov, letterstoeditor@bostonherald.com, "oig"
> > <oig@sec.gov>, Thunter@tribune.com, david@davidmyles.com,
> > ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca, "Dan Fitzgerald" <danf@danf.net>
> > Cc: dsheehan@bakerlaw.com, dspelfogel@bakerlaw.com,
> > mc@whistleblowers.org, gkachroo@mccarter.com,
> > david.straube@accenture.com, gurdip.s.sahota@accenture.com,
> > benjamin_mcmurray@ao.uscourts.gov, bob_burke@ao.uscourts.gov
> > Date: Monday, March 30, 2009, 10:00 PM
> >
> > Need I say BULLSHIT?
> >
> > http://www.bostonherald.com/business/general/view.bg?articleid=1162354&f
> > ormat=&page=2&listingType=biz#articleFull
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> > Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:03:13 -0300
> > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S
> > OFFICE
> > SDNY
> > To: Russ.Stanton@latimes.com, meredith.goodman@latimes.com,
> > ninkster@navigantconsulting.com, dgolub@sgtlaw.com
> > Cc: firstselectmanffld@town.fairfield.ct.us,
> > editor@whatsupfairfield.com, info@csiworld.org, jacques_poitras
> > <jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:40:55 -0300
> > Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
> > To: gmacnamara@town.fairfield.ct.us, MartiK1 <MartiK1@parl.gc.ca>,
> > "Paul. Harpelle" <Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca>, Jason Keenan
> > <jason.keenan@icann.org>, Kandalaw <Kandalaw@mindspring.com>
> > Cc: info@grahamdefense.org, fbinhct@leo.gov
> >
> > From: "Peck,Dave" <DPeck@town.fairfield.ct.us>
> > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:32:32 -0400
> > Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT
> > INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
> > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> >
> > I will be unavailable until 4/1/09.
> >
> > Deputy Chief MacNamara will be in charge while I am away.
> >
> > He can be reached at 254-4831 or email him at
> > gmacnamara@town.fairfield.ct.us
> >
> > I will not be checking emails or cell phone messages.
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Chief Dave Peck
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:32:18 -0300
> > Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
> > To: dpeck@town.fairfield.ct.us, edit@ctpost.com, bresee@courant.com
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:19:35 -0300
> > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
> > To: dtnews@telegraph.co.uk
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: USANYS-MADOFF
> > Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 3:06 PM
> > To: DAVID.RAYMOND.AMOS@GMAIL.COM
> > Subject: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
> >
> > In United States v. Bernard L. Madoff, 09 Cr. 213 (DC), the Court
> > received a request from NBC and ABC to unseal all correspondence from
> > victims that has been submitted in connection with the case.
> >
> > This includes your email to the Government.
> >
> > If the correspondence from victims is unsealed, the victim's personal
> > identifying information including name, address, telephone number and
> > email address (to the extent it was included on the correspondence)
> > will become public. The Government must submit a response to the
> > request by NBC and ABC by Tuesday, March 31, 2009. Please let us know
> > whether you consent to the full disclosure of your correspondence, or
> > whether you wish to have your correspondence remain sealed for privacy
> > or other reasons.
> > If you wish to have your correspondence remain sealed, please let us
> > know the reason. We will defend your privacy to the extent that we
> > can. Thank you.
> >
> > I looks like the US attorney in New York finally has to unseal my
> > emails that you dudes have been sitting on for quite some time for no
> > reason I will ever understand other than you are just a bunch of
> > chickenshits.
> >
> > I know NBC, ABC, your blogger buddies or any other media wacko will
> > never say my name but the pissed off folks that lost a lot of money
> > with Bernie Baby just may ask how the hell I am EH?
> >
> > Veritas Vincit
> > David Raymond Amos
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> > Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:48:50 -0300
> > Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
> > KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
> > To: Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> > Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:29:42 -0300
> > Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
> > KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
> > To: PChavkin@mintz.com
> > Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: "Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)" <Wendy.Olsen@usdoj.gov>
> > Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:08:04 -0400
> > Subject: RE: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
> > KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
> > To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> >
> > On March 10, 2009, the Honorable Denny Chin provided the following
> > guidance for victims who wish to be heard at the plea proceeding on
> > March 12, 2009 at 10:00 a.m.:
> >
> > Judge Chin stated that there are two issues that the Court will
> > consider at the hearing: (1) whether to accept a guilty plea from the
> > defendant to the eleven-count Criminal Information filed by the
> > Government, which provides for a maximum sentence of 150 years'
> > imprisonment; and (2) whether the defendant should be remanded or
> > released on conditions of bail, if the Court accepts a guilty plea.
> > Judge Chin also stated that, at the hearing on March 12, 2009, he will
> > conduct a plea allocution of the defendant and then will announce
> > whether the Court intends to accept the plea. At that time, the Court
> > will solicit speakers who disagree with the Court's intended ruling.
> >
> > Assuming the defendant pleads guilty and his plea is accepted by
> > the Court, the Court intends to allow the Government and defense
> > counsel to speak on the issue of bail. The Court will then announce
> > its intended ruling on that issue. The Court will then invite
> > individuals who disagree with the proposed ruling on bail to be heard.
> >
> > The Court noted that there will be opportunity for victims to be
> > heard in the future on the subjects of sentencing, forfeiture and
> > restitution in advance of any sentencing of the defendant. The Court
> > also noted that it is not appropriate for victims who wish to speak
> > concerning sentencing issues to be heard at the March 12, 2009
> > proceeding.
> >
> > A link to the a transcript of the March 10, 2009 Court hearing can
> > be found on the website of the United States Attorney's Office for the
> > Southern District of New York:
> >
> > http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/nys
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
> > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 10:56 AM
> > To: usanys.madoff@usdoj.gov
> > Subject: FW: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
> > KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 12:58 PM
> > To: horwitzd@dicksteinshapiro.com; Nardoza, Robert (USANYE);
> > USAMA-Media (USAMA); Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
> > Cc: oig
> > Subject: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and KPMG
> > etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
> >
> > horwitzd@dicksteinshapiro.com
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: "Sartory, Thomas J." <TSartory@goulstonstorrs.com>
> > Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 07:41:20 -0500
> > Subject: RE: I did talk the lawyers Golub and Flumenbaum tried to
> > discuss Bernie Madoff and KPMG etc before sending these emails
> > To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> >
> >
> > Dear Mr. Amos,
> >
> > I am General Counsel at Goulston & Storrs. Your email below to
> > Messers. Rosensweig and Reisch has been forwarded to me for response.
> > While it's not clear what type of assistance, if any, you seek from
> > Goulston % Storrs, please be advised that we are not in a position to
> > help you. Please do not send further communications to any of our
> > attorneys. We will not be able to respond, and your communications
> > will not be protected by the attorney-client privilege.
> >
> > We wish you well in the pursuit of your concerns.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > Thomas J. Sartory
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Amos [mailto:
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 8:18 PM
> > To: Rosensweig, Richard J.; info@LAtaxlawyers.com; Reisch, Alan M.;
> > reed@hbsslaw.com
> > Subject: Fwd: I did talk the lawyers Golub and Flumenbaum tried to
> > discuss Bernie Madoff and KPMG etc before sending these emails
> >
> > Perhaps somebody should call me back now. EH?
> >
> > UK Parliament Disclaimer:
> > This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have
> > received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your
> > system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted.
> > This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted
> > for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "R Hide (MIN)" <R.Hide@ministers.govt.nz>
> > To: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 6:33 PM
> > Subject: RE: BENJAMIN'S EASTON'S PROTEST NOTICE ABOUT INJUSTICES I
> > have an idea for you Ben
> >
> >
> > On behalf of the Hon Rodney Hide, Minister of Local Government, I wish
> > to acknowledge receipt of your email.
> >
> > Your correspondence has been placed in front of the Minister.
> >
> > regards
> >
> > Sandy Grove
> > Ministerial Private Secretary (Advisory)
> > Office of Hon Rodney Hide
> > WELLINGTON
> > Ph 04 817 6630
> > Email: sandy.grove@parliament.govt.nz
> >
> > The content of this email, including any attachment, is intended for
> > the named recipient only and is not necessarily the official view or
> > communication of the Department of Internal Affairs It may contain
> > privileged material and/or confidential information.
> >
> > If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must not
> > copy it, distribute it or take any action in reliance on it. If you
> > have received this email in error, please notify the sender
> > immediately and delete this email. Although this email has been
> > scanned for viruses, this email is not guaranteed to be free of
> > viruses and should be checked by your own security mechanisms. No
> > liability is accepted for any loss or damage arising from the use of
> > this email or its attachments.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, 29 September 2009 3:05 pm
> > To: T Ryall (MIN); Amy Adams; Jim Anderton;
> > anderton.wigram@xtra.co.nz; Jacinda Ardern; Shane Ardern; Chris
> > Auchinvole; Kanwaljit Singh Bakshi; Rick Barker; Carol Beaumont; David
> > Bennett; Loren Bolton (MIN); Jackie Blue; Chester Borrows;
> > chester.wanganui@xtra.co.nz; chester.hawera@xtra.co.nz; John Boscawen;
> > Sue Bradford; socialjustice@greens.org.nz; Simon Bridges; Natalie
> > Roberts (MIN); Brendon Burns; bb@brendonburns.co.nz; Chris Carter;
> > labourwest@xtra.co.nz; D Carter (MIN); cartermp@xtra.co.nz; J Carter
> > (MIN); northlandelectorate@xtra.co.nz; Steve Chadwick; Charles
> > Chauvel; Ashraf Choudhary; J Coleman (MIN); J Collins (MIN);
> > office@judithcollins.co.nz; Clayton Cosgrove;
> > claytoncosgrovekaiapoi@xtra.co.nz; David Cunliffe;
> > dcunliffe@xtra.co.nz; Clare Curran; lianne.dalziel@parliament.govt.nz;
> > Kelvin Davis; Jacqui Dean; Catherine Delahunty; Roger Douglas; P Dunne
> > (MIN); electjville@xtra.co.nz; Ruth Dyson; ruth.dyson@xtra.co.nz; B
> > English (MIN); elecgor@esi.co.nz; Darien Fenton;
> > office@labournorth.org.nz; C Finlayson (MIN); Jeanette Fitzsimons; Te
> > Ururoa Flavell; Craig Foss; craigfoss@backingthebay.co.nz; David
> > Garrett; Aaron Gilmore; p.goff@parliament.govt.nz; phil@goff.org.nz;
> > Jo Goodhew; sandra.goudie@national.org.nz; Kennedy Graham; Hon. Tim
> > Groser (MIN); nathan.guy@national.org.nz;
> > national.horowhenua@xtra.co.nz; national.kapiti@xtra.co.nz; Kevin
> > Hague; Hone Harawira; Terry Ututaonga; George Hawkins; John Hayes; P
> > Heatley (MIN); Tau Henare; tau.henaremp@xtra.co.nz; R Hide (MIN);
> > rodney@epsom.org.nz; Paul Hutchison; hunua.electorate@xtra.co.nz;
> > Shane Jones; shanejonesmp@xtra.co.nz; S Joyce (MIN); Rahui Katene;
> > Nikki Kaye; Sue Kedgley; J Key (MIN); genelle@johnkey.mp.net.nz;
> > A.King@parliament.govt.nz; kilbirnieeo@xtra.co.nz;
> > colin.kingmp@xtra.co.nz; winnie.laban@parliament.govt.nz;
> > mana.electorate@xtra.co.nz; Melissa Lee;
> > Iain.leesgalloway@parliament.govt.nz; Keith Locke;
> > greenmps.auckland@greens.org.nz;
> > peseta.sam.lotuiiga@parliament.govt.nz; Tim Macindoe;
> > moana.mackey@labour.org.nz; Nanaia Mahuta;
> > tainuielectorate@xtra.co.nz; Trevor Mallard; WOAoffice@xtra.co.nz;
> > petone.eo@clear.net.nz; W Mapp (MIN); Todd McClay; M McCully (MIN);
> > murray.mccully@xtra.co.nz; Sue Moroney; waikatohub.mps@xtra.co.nz;
> > Stuart Nash; Russel Norman; Hekia Parata; David Parker; Allan Peachey;
> > Ritchie Wards; lynne.pillaymp@xtra.co.nz; S Power (MIN);
> > simonpower.feilding@xtra.co.nz; simonpower.marton@xtra.co.nz; Rajen
> > Prasad; Paul Quinn; angela.bray@parliament.govt.nz;
> > jen.toogood@parliament.govt.nz; Chris Hipkins;
> > marlene.ditchfield@xtra.co.nz; janette.granville@xtra.co.nz; Pete
> > Hodgson; pete@petehodgson.co.nz; Parekura Horomia;
> > ikaroa.gis@xtra.co.nz; ikaroa.hstgs@xtra.co.nz; Darren Hughes; Raymond
> > Huo; office@grantrobertson.co.nz; Ross Robertson;
> > rae.waterhouse@xtra.co.nz; michael.clatworthy@xtra.co.nz; Eric Roy; H
> > Roy (MIN); Heather Henderson; Pita Sharples (MIN); Sua William Sio;
> > Trish Wanden; mp.rodney.warkworth@xtra.co.nz; N Smith (MIN);
> > nick@nick4nelson.co.nz; Maryan Street; Lindsay Tisch;
> > tolleywhk@xtra.co.nz; tolleygis@xtra.co.nz;
> > chris.tremain@national.org.nz; napier.electorate@airnet.net.nz;
> > Metiria Turei; greenmps.dunedin@greens.org.nz; T Turia (MIN);
> > Tari.Turia@xtra.co.nz; Philip Twyford; Louise Upston; Nicky Wagner; K
> > Wilkinson (MIN); waimakariri@xtra.co.nz; M Williamson (MIN); Michael
> > Woodhouse; blueandgold@parliament.govt.nz; P Wong (MIN);
> > pansy.wong@xtra.co.nz; ahan.young@parliament.govt.nz;
> > rosslynn@hrc.co.nz; sylviab@hrc.co.nz; michaelW@hrc.co.nz;
> > phillippa.smith@oag.govt.nz; Mark.Holman@ssc.govt.nz;
> > mark.thornton@justice.govt.nz; boris.vanbeusekom@justice.govt.nz;
> > tinz@paradise.net.nz; >; emma.miles@police.govt.nz;
> > John.Rivers@police.govt.nz; Mike.Webb@police.govt.nz;
> > nurses@nzno.org.nz; gay@pha.org.nz; qsolutionsrising@gmail.com;
> > easy@island.net; jardim.stratton@gmail.com;
> > christinejhansen@gmail.com; no_to_nwo@yahoo.co.uk;
> > johan.niklasson@evolution-production.com; lunalas@cox.net;
> > saxon1hero@yahoo.co.uk; journalist@bellsouth.net;
> > irenew.politico@gmail.com; daniel.solis@seznam.cz;
> > vickytoxotis@hotmail.com; wef339@mail.com; katcre22@yahoo.com;
> > scott@tkgtech.com; amandablake@blueyonder.co.uk;
> > who.flu.2009@gmail.com; jazon@ymail.com; sineadcasper@live.ie;
> > acpscotland@hotmail.co.uk; p.duffy93@ntlworld.com;
> > tua46054@temple.edu; ciaranmcloone@ooglemail.com;
> > marek_p2000@yahoo.com; black2000at@hotmail.com;
> > madame_karnak@yahoo.com; sracine@gmail.com;
> > annikatornlind@hotmail.com; manonf6@yahoo.com; matt@mattengelman.com;
> > grantlear@hotmail.com; helix7@hotmail.com; editor@uncensored.co.nz;
> > melocacau@gmail.com; steve.gosschalk@gmail.com;
> > tidalelectric@gmail.com; vapi.kupenga@xtra.co.nz;
> > eastwood.vincent@gmail.com; sichel@nsw.chariot.net.au;
> > mlm@archaeoskymatrix.com
> > Cc: laos_newzealand@yahoo.co.nz; jane burgermeister
> > Subject: RE: BENJAMIN'S EASTON'S PROTEST NOTICE ABOUT INJUSTICES I
> > have an idea for you Ben
> >
> > From: National Kapiti Electorate Office <national.kapiti@xtra.co.nz>
> > Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:14:19 +1300
> > Subject: RE: NZ HEALTH MINISTER TONY RYALL - MS PENNY DO YOU READ
> > EMAILS AS WELL AS WRITE THEM?
> > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> >
> > Dear Mr Amos
> > Thank you for copying Nathan in with your email to NZ Health Minister
> > Tony
> > Ryall. This has been passed on to Nathan for his information.
> >
> > Regards
> > Heather
> >
> > Heather Shaw| Electorate Agent for Hon Nathan Guy MP for Otaki
> > P: +64 4 298 2906| F: +64 4 298 4845| Shop 3, 23 Amohia Street,
> > Paraparaumu,
> > Kapiti Coast 5032
> > www.nathanguy.co.nz
> >
> > Regards
> > Heather
> >
> > Jan 3rd, 2004
> >
> > Mr. David R. Amos
> > 153 Alvin Avenue
> > Milton, MA U.S.A. 02186
> >
> > Dear Mr. Amos
> >
> > Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to
> > my predecessor,
> > the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding your safety. I apologize for the
> > delay in responding.
> >
> > If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
> > suggest that you contact
> > the police of local jurisdiction. In addition, any evidence of
> > criminal activity should be brought
> > to their attention since the police are in the best position to
> > evaluate the information and take
> > action as deemed appropriate.
> >
> > I trust that this information is satisfactory.
> >
> > Yours sincerely
> > A. Anne McLellan”
> >
> > September 11th, 2004
> >
> > Dear Mr. Amos,
> >
> > On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne
> > Clarkson, I acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and
> > CD regarding corruption, one received from you directly, and the
> > other forwarded to us by the Office of the Lieutenant Governor of
> > New Brunswick.
> >
> > I regret to inform you that the Governor General cannot
> > intervene in matters that are the responsibility of elected officials
> > and courts of
> > Justice of Canada. You already contacted the various provincial
> > authorities
> > regarding your concerns, and these were the appropriate steps to take.
> >
> > Yours sincerely.
> >
> > Renee Blanchet
> > Office of the Secretary to the Governor General
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:12:44 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: We just talked
> To: scott.white@thecanadianpress.com, pagek@parl.gc.ca,
> editor@policeprofessional.com
> Cc: IgnatM <IgnatM@parl.gc.ca>, LaytoJ <LaytoJ@parl.gc.ca>,
> jemma@policeprofessional.com, hiddenfromhistory
> <hiddenfromhistory@yahoo.ca>
>
> Need i say i was not surprised when Askari and his boss Kevin Page
> formerly of the PCO office did not respond to my phone calls or email
> yesterday?
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:39:54 -0300
> Subject: We just talked
> To: askarm@parl.gc.ca
>
> Mostafa Askari
> Director General
> Library of Parliament
> Economic and Fiscal Analysis
> Parliament Buildings
> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A9
> Canada
>
> Telephone : 613-992-8045
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 18:07:59 -0300
> Subject: You Cato dudes played dumb again about your missing blog and
> the documents I sent ya but lets see if one of your Directors is a
> dumb as you and the Feds pretend to be
> To: barnold@cato.org, kcouchman@cato.org, ckennedy@cato.org,
> amast@cato.org
> Cc: "rick. skinner" <rick.skinner@dhs.gov>, "Dean.Buzza"
> <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>
> The text of the blog of Tom Palmer's that Cato denies existed can be
> found within my blog and many other places as well as this email
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/2005/03/ides-of-march.html
>
> March 24, 2005
> Crazy as a Loon, but Free
>
> Off to Iceland!
>
> Well, Bobby Fischer has his Icelandic passport. The U.S. government
> can now stop persecuting him for the crime of playing chess in
> Yugoslavia. Fischer may be out of his mind (tha’ts almost certain, if
> you consider his anti-Semitism and praise for the 9-11 attacks), but
> he’s not out of his mind for choosing Iceland as his country of
> refuge. And the Icelanders, who may later regret having such an
> utterly crazy person wandering around in their country, have done the
> right thing by offering him refuge.
>
> NOTE: I seem to have attracted a stalker, who keeps posting strange
> messages on this site. Whatever.
>
> Posted by Tom Palmer at March 24, 2005 07:09 AM | TrackBack
>
> Comments
> Quite frankly I do not understand this. What does Iceland gain from
> this? Fischer himself stated that he would NEVER return to chess. So,
> it is unlikely that he will play for Iceland... and even though he
> did, it is not like he’d be back at the top.
> Now, he might want to teach his fellow Icelanders
> Fischerrandom...Fischerrandom is to chess what Estonian grammar is to
> linguistic ...And THAT sounds like a threat to me. NV
>
>
> Posted by: Nathalie I. Vogel at March 24, 2005 08:36 AM
> I doubt that Iceland has much to gain. (And I suspect that the
> inhabitants of Reykjavik may suffer from having an insufferable
> loudmouth crackpot wandering around.) But they did the right thing.
> The better thing would have been for the U.S. to drop its case against
> Mr. Fischer. I don't think you should lose your passport or suffer
> criminal prosecution for traveling someplace to play chess. I think
> that the position of the U.S. government (and of both Democratic and
> Republican administrations) is the harder one to understand.
>
> Posted by: Tom G. Palmer at March 24, 2005 08:47 AM
> TGP: "Fischer may be out of his mind (tha’ts almost certain, if you
> consider his anti-Semitism "
>
> I don't want to go all Szaszian on someone for what is most likely a
> casual comment, but suggesting someone is "out of his mind" simply
> because he is (labeled as) anti-Semitic seems overmuch. Immoral,
> perhaps...poorly informed, possibly...holding to views developed as a
> result of childhood associations, maybe...a confusion on either the
> part of Fischer or the person making the accusation of anti-Semitism
> with anti-Zionism, quite possible. But "out of his mind"?
>
> Posted by: Ross Levatter at March 24, 2005 11:17 AM
> Ross, Tom did refer to 'his' anti-Semitism; maybe it's not just that
> Fischer does not like Jews, but that he suffers from a particularly
> radical form of bigotry.
>
> I wouldn't know myself, but that was the inference I drew from Tom's
> comment.
>
> Posted by: Henri Hein at March 25, 2005 02:45 AM
> Then, Henri, he would be immoral, or bigoted, not "out of his mind".
> And he should consult an ethicist, not a travel agent or chiropracter
> to bring him back to his mind or better align it.
> Again, my point was merely that "out of his mind" implies one must be
> crazy or mentally ill to be anti-Semitic; I think that's a category
> error.
>
> Ross
>
> Posted by: Ross Levatter at March 25, 2005 06:54 PM
> Ross's points are well taken, but I do think that some term such as
> "crazy" (I'll stay away from "mentally ill") is useful in describing
> Mr. Fischer. (And even Thomas Szasz readily admits that there are
> "lots of crazy people" around; he just says that they're not sick.)
>
> The anti-Semitism that Mr. Fischer spouts is not of the "they wouldn't
> be welcome in our club" sort (bad as that is), but of the "Organized
> International Jewry is out to get me," sort. The former is an example
> of bad behavior, bad manners, immoral views, or the like. The latter
> sort of anti-Semitism is an obsession that seems in general to be
> immune to either moral appeal (since it's a claim about an alleged
> state of affairs, viz., that the Jews run everything and are out to
> get one) or to factual refutation (how do you argue someone out of
> such a...for want of a better word...crazy view?).
>
> Posted by: Tom G. Palmer at March 25, 2005 11:34 PM
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: rjvattuone@aol.com
> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 9:59 AM
> Subject: This is going to get interesting
>
>
> Hey Richard
>
> Thanks for calling me back the other day. Here is my number in Boston
> 617 698-6549 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 617 698-6549
> end_of_the_skype_highlighting. I will be hitting the road shortly
> and I will be sending out to you hard copy of what I am sending to
> Scott Daruty. However there is a great deal more you should know ASAP.
> I am involved against the biggest and baddest of them all and we all
> know they play for keeps. It is important that you know much and have
> evidence of it in order to protect yourself. I know they moniter my
> phone calls and I have know doubt that they listen to the Canadain
> Cell as well. The fact that you spoke to me honestly and openly puts
> you in jeopardy. If you had acted like most lawyers, the bastards
> would leave you alone. If you come to my aid, they will attack you.
> Trust me it has happened before and I will send proof of it in the
> following emails. Some contain the Tiffs I mentioned I am curious to
> see if they get through AOL system. I hack been blocked by them in the
> past. I have not heard from Barry Bachrach since just after he warned
> me that the FBI was about to pounce on me on Oct 1st. It seems they
> have him running scared. I must do my best to protect honest men..
>
> The following is what I just posted but it seems Bill Gates does not
> allow Tiff files in his sites so I will forward it to you to support
> what I said is true. Answer this email if and when you get it an I
> will send some others if you wish. However I think it would be better
> not to use AOL. As I said just get one in Yahoo or Hotmail they work
> better and are free.
>
> From: motomaniac in response to Message 1 Sent: 3/27/2005 9:21 AM
>
> In defense of Bobby Fischer I must say that he is just another man
> like me. He has his strengths and his weaknesses. Just like me. One
> particular forte of his, the amazing ability to play a game very well
> thrust him into the limelight for the whole wide world to study and
> examine his every move. More importantly I believe his fame caused him
> to become a pawn in the big big game. Although he had his right to
> privacy, the whole world dogged at his heels and critized his every
> action as a man. The Masters of War obviously tried use him to their
> advantage during the Cold War. He is not a stateman or a lawyer. He is
> simply a free thinking individual who has every right to speak his
> mind particularly after he has suffered through hell just because he
> plays chess so very well.
>
> I say judge not lest ye be judged and mind your own mouth about things
> you do not know all the details of. I am far more outspoken than Bobby
> ever was and yet you have never even heard of my name. It is because
> the corporate controlled media is not permited to do so. I am nobody
> with any special talent that had caused me to be thrown into public
> scrutiny before I was compelled to speak out as Bobby has done. I do
> not have to agree or disagree with his every word over the years to
> understand his meaning and his troubles. That said, in all honesty it
> would behoove us both if his lawyer would listen to me and employ
> Bobby's fame to expose the truth of all that we say.
>
> I am am not a perfect person and neither is Bobby. I do not know him
> nor do I judge him. Yet I do agree with with his standing in defense
> of his freedom. The Chessmaster has every right to spout off against
> the Masters of War because they have offended him greatly. It is for
> his attorney to weed out the truth and evidence of his convictions and
> present it in court in order to seek relief on his client's behalf. A
> jury of his peers will decide the truth of his matters not us bloggers
> without veiwing and hearing all the evidence. Forget what you may
> glean from the media. The information is controlled and slanted
> against him. Listen to what his lawyer says and what is used in
> arguement against him on the public record. Do not hold court in the
> media just gossip about things you know are true in order for the
> courts to act properly in the public interest.
>
> Bobby has paid the devil his due and done time in his jails. It is
> time for him to seek relief. I have as well. I was summoned to jail in
> the USA while running for Parliament in Canada and held under the
> charges of "other". I will not want allow myself to be judged on just
> one particular act or deed. My criminal trial in the USA is coming
> very soon. I will have lots to say.
>
> It is the average of all our days and deeds that speaks of us as the
> men we are. Like any game, it is what happens in the end that counts.
> Sometimes sacrifices must be made and sometimes mistakes are made.
> However once the word "checkmate" is declared, it is all over but the
> crying as long as we play by the rules and the fat lady sings in tune.
> I am more than happy to provide to Mr. Vattuone my evidence of much
> public corruption in order to support Bobby's lawsuit against the USA.
> It is high time the the Masters of War paid the fiddler and then be
> compelled to dance to a different tune as we make them fall on their
> own sword. No one is above the law. The public trust must be upheld or
> we are all losers in the the big big game. Forget Bobby and chess for
> a minute and listen to what he is saying through his attorney. I
> applaud is efforts in support of Bobby and his legal matters. I hope
> we get on like a house on fire. Any enemy of my foe should be a friend
> of mine. Bobby lawyer is your neighbor listen to him and then speak
> out to protect your own civil rights. What happened to Bobby and I
> could happen to you next. Get it?
>
> If anyone wishes to challenge what I have said, respond to this
> message with a email account that can hold of 25 megs of attachments.
> I will send you Tiff files of legal documents etc. that will take you
> down path of of the Garden of Good and Evil that everybody knows is
> true. I simply made it a point to prove it. My particular forte that
> helped accomplish such a necessary task is that I am more stubburn
> than a pig, meaner than a snake and smarter than the average bear.
> Much to my chagrin, I am just an average sort of chess player and have
> much to learn from Bobby in that regard but I maintain that chess is
> just a game. Bobby was compelled to play a far more serious and deadly
> game just because of his love of a game. I do recognize his talent but
> my hat is off to him because of what he did and stood for as a man not
> a chess player. In regards to his legal actions methinks I can teach
> his attorney a trick or two of mine.
>
> If anyone has any questions here is my phone number. 506 434-1379
> begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 506 434-1379
> end_of_the_skype_highlighting Feel free to argue me and stress test my
> ethics to the max. It is your freedom as well as my own that I am
> protecting. I think anyone has the right to question my motives. I
> speak plainly and do not hide my identity. Integrity does not need a
> mask to hide behind. However men like John Ashcroft and all his
> cohorts need jails to cage honest men who speak their mind about their
> masks of virtue.
>
> Bobby is just one man of many. His is fortunate that he is famous.
> Iceland would not do such things on behalf of the likes of me and many
> others. However Canada or Japan or whatever would do the same against
> me to support President Bush in a New York minute. In fact it already
> happened. The one file I have attached is the reason Clark Kent Ervin
> got fired immediately after the recent election. He long along proved
> to me that he was not interested in Truth Justice and the American Way
> and in fact he is a dumb as a post. I will wager I could beat him at
> chess. I know I played him like a fiddle as a lawyer and that is his
> game of choice. It was really to funny to me the advice he offered to
> others as he entered into the Aspen Crowd of nasty dudes. I feel the
> need to quote him. Many a govenment lawyer will understand why I am
> busting my gut laughing. I hope Bobby's lawyer does too.
>
> Lauren Robinson POGO Fellow " Any advice for your fellow public servants?"
>
> Clark Kent Ervin "Well, just do your job and let the political chips
> fall where they may. Unless your're willing to do that, it seems to me
> you shouldn't take the job in the first place."
>
> My answer to his remark is No Shit Sherlock. The former Inspector
> General can expect a rather profound civil lawsuit. He must argue me
> Pro Se or a at least without government assistance on his behalf
> because he failed to act within the scope of his employment and he is
> now out of the job.
>
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
> Posted by: David R. Amos at March 27, 2005 06:12 PM
> December 7th, 2003
>
> Gene Healy Senior Editor Cato Institute
> 1000 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
> Washington D.C. 20001-5403
> Phone (202) 842-0200 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting
> (202) 842-0200 end_of_the_skype_highlighting
> Fax (202) 842-3490
> RE: Corruption
> Sir,
> Please find enclosed an exact copy of a letter with all its enclosures
> recently sent to the Hearst Corporation and many others. Many of your
> directors such as Lewis E. Randall, John C. Malone and Jeffrey S. Yass
> should find the documents an interesting read. I ask that you make
> them available for their review.
> I watched David Boaz speak on C-Span the other day and heard him say
> many things. What I found the most interesting was that he said that
> the Cato Institute was named after some rather prolific letter
> writers. I invite you all to read mine. They can be found at the
> website mentioned in the enclosed documents. I could not send this
> letter to Mr. Boaz because he is not a lawyer and an officer of the
> court as you are. This is because only law enforcement authorities or
> officers of the court have any right to listen to the copy of wiretap
> numbered 139. It is served upon you in confidence as an officer of the
> court in order that you may act ethically and see that it is properly
> investigated. Please share the contents of the Cd with only the proper
> authorities so that I may never be accused of violating anyone’s
> Fourth Amendment Rights.
> As I have said to many other lawyers, at the very least I have now
> made you a witness to my pursuit of justice. I ask you simply the
> following. What will you do with your newfound knowledge of Civil
> Rights Violations and Government Corruption?
> Best Regards
> David R.Amos
> 153 Alvin Ave.
> Milton MA. 02186
>
> Posted by: David R. Amos at March 27, 2005 06:22 PM
> Um, as I was saying about some people being, um, a bit....well,
> "different."
>
> Posted by: Tom G. Palmer at March 27, 2005 09:12 PM
> Did I mention that I found snotty Oxford dudes had stuffed shirts and
> were great fun to poke fun at as they bullshit others about how smart
> they are?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: marnie.ferguson@keyporter.com
> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 5:08 PM
> Subject: Fw: I just called I am not kidding
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: deborahlbmc@yahoo.com ; egeetter@bu.edu ;
> dfpletters@dailyfreepress.com ; lawrence_summers@harvard.edu ;
> wrogersjr@therogerslawfirm.com ; thomas.hannigan@ropesgray.com ;
> jotodd@toddweld.com
> Cc: warren.tolman@hklaw.com ; dan@dankennedy.net ; w.kirtz@neu.edu ;
> howiecarr@wrko.com ; bzelnick@bu.edu ; n.daniloff@neu.edu ;
> barnicle@969fmtalk.com ; wsj.ltrs@wsj.com ; amy.wolfcale@dowjones.com
> ; joseph.stern@dowjones.com ; letters@washpost.com ; fair@fair.org ;
> editor@usatoday.com ; pressreleases@upi.com ; letters@time.com ;
> newshour@pbs.org ; ombudsman@npr.org ; morning@npr.org ;
> letters@newsweek.com ; nytnews@nytimes.com ;
> dfpletters@dailyfreepress.com ; gillooly@dailyfreepress.com ;
> dfpnews@dailyfreepress.com ; 48hours@cbsnews.com ; pr@ap.org ;
> nightline@abcnews.com
> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 4:21 PM
> Subject: Fw: I just called I am not kidding
>
>
> Hey
>
> It appears that all the Law Schools know nothing of ethical behavior
> if it may affect their coffers. I made it my task to prove it. Lets
> see if I can turn the worm and make the light dawn on Marblehead for
> the benefit of all.
>
> Whereas Todd Klipp is on Legal Advisory Committee United Educators
> (UE) Insurance Risk Retention Group I called Corporate Counsel, Jan
> Holt and told her something is up and that I would be serving the Hard
> Copy of the evidence that proves what I say is true upon Mr. Klipp. If
> I were you I would go to the US District Court in Beantown, query the
> dockets that bear my name and ask the BU professor Chief Justice Young
> about his integrity and his association with crooks like Charles J.
> Kickham Jr. and all of his cohorts.
>
> Cardinal Law would be a good witness to ask to start a proper
> investigation that is if you can get whoever becomes the next US
> Ambassador to the Vatican to make him fess up about his sins.
> Otherwise ask his former secretary Robert Kickham he is now O'Malley's
> secretary. I have no doubt that little bastard knows everything but
> trust that the three legal stooges Todd, Rogers and Hannigan have told
> him to shut up and wait for me to quit or die. However I think the
> Kickhams will soon fold their hand and start rattin out others very
> soon. Their is no honour amongst theives and I have the Kickhams
> cornered after three years of hard work. Their big daddy Chucky is
> dead and the rest of them are as dumb as a post. Uncle Franky has been
> dead since last June and I have finally forced the court to admit it.
> None of their accountings have been assented to by anyone and the IRS
> must check their work before my wife will settle. the Feds have a big
> problem and everybody knows its me.
>
> I am proud to say I won't quit and don't care if I die. I made certain
> that my truths live on and that no Kickham relatives can no longer
> claim to be kin to my little Clan. I refuse to allow my family to
> associate with bible pounding criminals that expound of law nor will I
> settle with them in order that they may escape justice. They must be
> held accountable and so should all their friends.
>
> I may seem crazy but at least I know my rights and will not allow
> wrongs against my family to go unpunished, particularly when the
> wrongs are practiced by people well paid or licensed by the state to
> insure that matters such as this never happen. If I am not crazy then
> the governments of Canada and the USA must be insanely corrupt. I know
> for a fact that there are a lot of ordinary people that agree with me
> therefore I know I am OK but I have my doubts about you. i am giving
> Mr. Klipp just enough evidence to impeach George Bush and for safe
> measure I am giving the same material to many others as well. Here's
> hoping ethics wins out after all. Otherwise we are all losers and the
> crooks within such organizations as the Aspen Institute will keep on
> advising the bastards on how to screw us all.
>
> The judges of the First Circuit of the US District Court have a lot to
> be accountable for and Judge Young is well aware of it all. He has no
> right to teach others about trial practice and the law until he proves
> that he understands how to uphold the law. I will be suing the bastard
> in short order you pick whether you wish to stand with him or me.
> There is no middle ground in this legal battle for Boston University
> to stand on. Judge Young is in your employ. However methinks he is no
> longer a feather in your cap. The University has bragged to have such
> a man to teach the students. What say you now?
>
> Trust that I don't care if anyone reads this email or not. In fact it
> will be more fun if ya didn't.
>
> "The Honorable William G. Young was appointed judge of the U.S.
> District Court for Massachusetts in 1984, after serving as associate
> justice of the state’s Superior Court. Prior positions include special
> assistant attorney general, chief counsel to the governor, and clerk
> for the Honorable Raymond Wilkins, former chief justice of the
> Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. Judge Young has a long list of
> pro bono activities, teaching experience, and several awards,
> including the Award for Judicial Excellence from the Massachusetts
> Academy of Trial Attorneys. Judge Young developed the course Advanced
> Trial Practice and also teaches Evidence."
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: jb95@bu.edu
> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 1:02 PM
> Subject: Fw: I just called I am not kidding
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: MauraH@ci.boston.ma.us ; maurah@maurahennigan.com
> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 12:36 PM
> Subject: I just called I am not kidding
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: info@pogo.org ; elliot.gerson@aspeninstitute.org ;
> pat.zindulka@aspeninstitute.org ; peter. reiling@aspeninstitute.org ;
> clark.ervin@aspeninstitute.org
> Cc: brian@questionsquestions.net ; plough@ploughshares.ca ; moto
> maniac ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca ; kbar@nbnet.nb.ca ; backtalk@motherjones.com
> ; Wes Penre@Illuminati News.com ; tpalmer@cato.org ; ghealy@cato.org ;
> david@davidakin.com ; McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ; david@lutz.nb.ca ;
> cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ; ethics@harvard.edu ;
> INFO7@elections.ca ; inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca ; cotlei@parl.gc.ca ;
> Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ;
> Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ; Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.ma.us ;
> Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.ma.us
> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 9:30 AM
> Subject: I just left voicemail for Jim Spiegelman
>
>
> Hey Fellas
> I have picked you Mr. Gerson to send exactly the same material that I
> sent to two Solicitor Generals last year before I ran for Parliament
> in Canada. I am certain that material caused Theodore Olson to quit
> his job and your brand new fellow, Clark Kent Erwin to get the boot
> from his job right after the last Yankee election.
> Obviously I picked you because of your own bragging. There is no need
> for me to expand upon things that you and I know to be true. It is
> merely my task to prove to the world that you are well aware of my
> concerns and allegations. Then if you and your Association does
> nothing to uphold the public trust, I will make it my best effort to
> embarrass you all in court in front of a jury of my peers. You people
> claim to inspire people to ethical leaders? I say Bullshit. What say
> you?
> Say Hey to Superman for me. Will ya? Yea I know I just did but he
> likes to keep everything in confidence while his cohorts keep me
> falsely imprisoned. However I plan to call him to testify during my
> pending criminal trial as I have the right to do. I should be very
> interesting to see if he takes the fifth.
> David R. Amos
>
>
> "Elliot Gerson is responsible for the Aspen Institute's seminars,
> including the Executive Seminar, topical and custom seminars, and
> those offered in the Society of Fellows and Socrates programs. He also
> manages the Institute's public programs and activities, including the
> Aspen Ideas Festival. He is a graduate of Harvard College, Oxford
> University, where he was a Rhodes Scholar, and Yale Law School. As
> American Secretary of the Rhodes Trust, he manages the U.S. Rhodes
> Scholarships and is an advisor to the Mandela Rhodes Foundation in
> Cape Town, which focuses on African higher education and leadership.
> He was a U. S. Supreme Court clerk and has had a career including the
> practice of law, executive positions in state and federal government
> and a presidential campaign, president of leading insurance and
> healthcare companies, and service on many non-profit boards,
> especially in the arts."
>
>
> Posted by: David R. Amos at March 30, 2005 05:23 PM
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: backtalk@motherjones.com
> Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 4:01 PM
> Subject: Fw: Cya in court Cato
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: tpalmer@cato.org ; ghealy@cato.org ; tcarpent@cato.org ;
> dboaz@cato.org ; rpilon@cato.org ; cpreble@cato.org ; tlynch@cato.org
> ; blindsey@cato.org ; rlevy@cato.org ; tfirey@cato.org ;
> ecrane@cato.org
> Cc: Wes Penre@Illuminati News ; freedom_of_information@yahoogroups.com
> ; Letters@globeandmail.ca ; webmaster@canadalawcourts.com ; lloyd
> brinson ; J. D. Kuntz ; elois@newdata.ca ; Jack Hook ; John Bjornstrom
> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 8:47 PM
> Subject: Cya in court Cato
>
>
>
> Hey Tommy Boy
> You invited me. These are your words correct? I tried to register on
> line but your link does not work. I want to come. we should be in
> agreement in most things but I know we are not and we should really
> talk about it before I file my civil lawsuits. You people have already
> proven to me your malice. this is your last chance to act ethically.
> My criminal trial will begin shortly thereafter and I may call some of
> you to testify at it. One of them could be you. I am one of those
> people that many already turn to for an honest opinion. Right or wrong
> they know my answer comes from sincere ethical consideration because I
> am more a man of my word than legions of lawyers ever were. I am good
> to my friends and sheer hell to my foes. I hate the false fronts of
> integrity of the people you joke about within your following
> invitation. You are joking. I am not.
> Dear Friend,
>
> Would you like to be the person to whom others turn for an explanation
> of the debate over Social Security and retirement, the economics of
> international trade, or how to control pollution and protect the
> environment through incentives? Would you like to be better able to
> explain the benefits of free markets, private property, and free trade
> to your friends, colleagues, and family members?
>
> If so, you should come to Washington, D.C., for the Cato University
> seminar April 28 to May 1 on Applied Economics: User-Friendly Tools to
> Understand Politics, Business Enterprise, and Life. The faculty
> includes top-level economists and policy experts from universities and
> the Cato Institute.
>
> The seminar will be held in the F. A. Hayek Auditorium of the Cato
> Institute, with dinner and a tour at Mount Vernon, the historic home
> of George Washington.
>
> Our goal is to help attendees become the people to whom their friends
> turn to explain the economy and how political interference in markets
> tends to generate disaster. And there's a reason it's being held in
> Washington, D.C. You see, we want to change fundamentally the culture
> of Washington, D.C. Washington's a very strange city. Most of the
> people here spend their working days taking from Peter to give to Paul
> (minus a substantial cut, of course). Or writing minute and
> incomprehensible "regulations" on the optimal size of broccoli, or
> warning people to wear sensible shoes, or just figuring out new ways
> to strip American citizens of their rights and dignity.
>
> You can come to D.C. for a long weekend and learn how to change that.
> You'll learn how to make the arguments that will convince your
> friends, coworkers, and neighbors that they don't need or benefit from
> all those rules, redistributions, regulations, and rip-offs.
>
> You're invited to attend one Cato University seminar, or two, or
> three. Each is a stand alone seminar, but all three are complementary.
> (The other two are on history and on the art and technique of
> persuasion.)
>
> Please check out the faculty and schedule, and register using our
> secure registration form. Online registration is safe, easy, and fast.
>
> Come to Washington, D.C. ... and learn how to change it.
>
> I look forward to welcoming you to Cato University this year.
>
> Cordially,
>
> and Signed by you. Tom Palmer
>
> In order not to be somehow overlooked, I just called you cell phone to
> cell phone so that I would have a record of contact to let you know we
> had a problem to discuss. You were to busy to talk so you missed your
> chance. Methinks you are a fine example of the reason your buddy Gene
> Healy and his ilk ignored me. I read enough of your work to think you
> are a very snotty tall talking whore for the Global Corps. I wanted to
> hear your voice to be certain my feelings were correct. You did not
> dissappoint me. If you don't like my opinion of you, sue me and bring
> all these emails to court. I promise I will not file a motion to
> dismiss. In fact I can't wait to meet your lawyers. I thought what you
> said about Bobby Fischer was far more offensive and as you can see I
> blogged in his defense. Many people call me crazy too. That seem to be
> the label bad actors put on someone when they are cornered. I wanted
> you to hear my voice so that you would understand that I am not nuts
> but very sincere. when you shunned my last words were see you in
> court. Ignore me some more and you certainly will. Check my work
> before you laugh and call me crazy too.
> In order to prove you all I am serious I will send Roger Pilon, Vice
> President for Legal Affairs at 1000 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.,
> Washington D.C. 20001-5403 hard copy of exactly the same material I
> sent to two Solicitor Generals last year just before I ran for
> Parliament. Teddy Olson quit and went into private practice as soon as
> Stephen Harper opened his mouth about the Arar Inquiry but thus far
> Landslide Annie has hung onto hers. Now if you have any questions of
> me before we meet, ask them to New Canadian Ambassador Franky Boy
> McKenna. He knows exactly who I am and what has happened in the year
> since. If you want a Yankee perspective ask John Ashcroft, John
> Edwards. Tom Ridge, Clark Kent Ervin, Theodore Olson or David
> Aufhauser to name a few. They all are now free agents and in the same
> hot water as your buddy and now you.
> I emailed ya, blogged ya, called ya and am now telling some your
> friends plus a few of mine for good measure. Under Title 18 of the
> federal code you are all as guilty as everyone else if you don't get
> honest real fast. Ask Frank Quatronne and Martha Stewart about email
> evidence in federal court
> In light of the reasons I was falsely imprisoned and what I had sent
> you dudes the year before it makes Cato's work in "Go Directly to
> Jail: The Criminalization of Almost Everything." a total bullshit
> piece of work. It is my job to properly shame you bastards so that
> nobody will take you seriously ever again.
>
> "At one time, the sanction of the criminal law was reserved for
> serious, morally culpable offenders. But during the past 40 years, an
> unholy alliance of tough-on-crime conservatives and anti-big-business
> liberals has utterly transformed the criminal law. Today, while
> violent crime often goes unpunished, Congress continues to add new,
> trivial offenses to the federal criminal code. With more than 4,000
> federal offenses on the statute books, and thousands more buried in
> the Code of Federal Regulations, it is now frighteningly easy for
> American citizens to be hauled off to jail for actions that no
> reasonable person would regard as crimes. At the same time, rampant
> federalization and mandatory minimum sentencing are making America’s
> criminal justice system ever more centralized and punitive. The result
> is a labyrinthine criminal code, a burgeoning prison population, and
> often real injustice. Go Directly to Jail examines those alarming
> trends and proposes reforms that could rein in a criminal justice
> apparatus at war with fairness and common sense."
> If you dudes do not want me to turn up after being invited please let
> me know why in writing and introduce me to the lawyer I will be
> arguing someday in court.
> David R. Amos
> 153 Alvin Ave.
> Milton, MA 02186
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: dante17678@hotmail.com
> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 10:20 AM
> Subject: Fw: Hunky-dory EH Petey
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: rjvattuone@aol.com
> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 10:04 AM
> Subject: Fw: Hunky-dory EH Petey
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: lsewell@canadians.org
> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 7:27 AM
> Subject: Fw: Hunky-dory EH Petey
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: jeffryhouse@hotmail.com
> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 7:03 AM
> Subject: Fw: Hunky-dory EH Petey
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca ; Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca ; Jack Layton ;
> Easter.W@parl.gc.ca ; Cadman.C@parl.gc.ca ; Casey.B@parl.gc.ca ;
> Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca
> Cc: McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca ; Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca ;
> macaul1@parl.gc.ca ; Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca ; Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca ;
> Anderson.D@parl.gc.ca ; Anderson.Da@parl.gc.ca ;
> david.anderson1@sk.sympatico.ca
> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 7:12 PM
> Subject: Hunky-dory EH Petey
>
>
> I got a better one for ya Petey Boy. "Thar she blows". I bet Belinda
> is really pissed off at everybody and is letting off some steam. If I
> were you I would start bailing out of your new party like any other
> rat that would desert a sinking ship. That is one boat that could
> never float. The way you back stabbed your way into its creation will
> likely never be forgotten. Some of the new Senators Martin just
> appointed proved that didn't they? Right now you are just hanging on
> and kissing Harper's arse because nobody else will ever trust you in
> their Dory except maybe the diddler, Billy Matthews. He is used to
> turningcoat and needs help bailing out his punky little craft. I think
> the liberals are tired of him by now and Johnny Crosbie is likely
> pretty pissed at him too. I think you two dudes should be good company
> for each other as everybody else tries to distance themselves from a
> couple of cry babies that call themselves Maritimers. You were
http://www.scribd.com/doc/2619608/Upper-Canadians
September 10th 2004
Paul J.J. Cavalluzzo
C/o Veena Verma
Cavalluzzo, Hayes, Shilton, McIntyre & Cornish
PO Box 507, Station B
Ottawa, ON K1P 5P6
David Orchard
C/o Peter Rosenthal
Roach, Schwartz and Associates
688 St. Clair Avenue West
Toronto, ON M6C 1B1
Jean-Pierre Kingsley
C/o Diane R. Davidson
Elections Canada
257 Slater Street
Ottawa, ON K1P 5G4
Peter MacKay
C/o Arthur Hamilton
Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
2100 Scotia Plaza, 40 King St. W.
Toronto, ON M5H 3C2
RE: Corruption
Hey,
It has been over three months since I returned to Canada and contacted
you all. Now that I have returned to the USA I will wait only three
more weeks for you to act ethically and uphold the Public Trust. CTV
or whatever said Fundy was a riding to watch but nobody mentioned me.
I answered openly and honestly to every question put to me in every
debate that I was allowed to attend. I had lots to say and now my work
speaks for itself as I fall silent. Now I have a few questions. I
would appreciate honest answers.
Pursuant to my many contacts and various conversations to you folks or
those of your offices, please find enclosed an exact copy of all
material sent to Jean Chretien and Brian Mulroney. The copy of wiretap
tape numbered 139 is served upon Diane R. Davidson, Veena Verma, Peter
Rosenthal, Arthur Hamilton and Peter MacKay in confidence as officers
of the court in order that it may be properly investigated by the Arar
Commission. May I suggest that Veena Verma solicit the Arar Commisson
to demand CSIS to provide them with the six original tapes given to
the priest, Bill Elliot and the Sussex Detachment of the RCMP in order
that they may be investigated as well.
By the time you read this letter and study the contents hopefully I
will have returned to the USA and stood in court once more in order to
defend my Clan’s rights and interests. I will be inserting this letter
to you folks in the Public Record of many courts in the USA. If you
act ethically and quickly I will see no reason to sue you. However I
will be calling you all to testify to what you know to be true. Shame
on all of you for allowing my country to throw me back into the
clutches of Attorney General Ashcroft without any regard for my
safety. If I die my blood will be on your hands.
Too many mobsters and crooked FEDS want these god-damned tapes for me
to think otherwise. As you can see I have signed statements from both
a US Attorney and a District Attorney claiming for over one year now
that these tapes are part of our Probate Actions. I will prove that
they are not two more times before I complain of every lawyer and law
enforcement authority that I have contacted in two countries.
Oct 3rd, 2004, I will count you all amongst the conspirators against
me if I do not receive an answer from you that I agree with by that
date. Now you know I ain’t joking.
Mr. Rosenthal, I have no doubt that you are a clever fellow. Teaching
Math is clean work. I admire that you only choose to practice law when
you consider a matter to be of great social importance. After my
speaking with David Orchard and studying his actions since that time.
I believe David Orchard is all about David Orchard and the Public
Trust only interests him when it affects his interests. The minor spit
and chew about the demise of his former party is somewhat petty
considering the far more important issues that are afoot these days.
Would not your services be better placed in assisting me in compelling
the governments to uphold the law and the Public Trust? I ask that you
study the material I have provided closely and then think about your
own words and that of your friends. They are hereto attached for your
review. My question is don’t you think it would benefit all Canadians
if I complained of Anne McLellan and Wayne Easter in order to make
them accountable for their lack of diligence in protecting my dumb
ass? Just because I am a pigheaded Canadian layman, it does not follow
that Anne or Wayne should allow Ashcroft and his cohorts to try to
send me to Cuba without counsel. Many lawyers wish for me to simply
disappear or quit so that they could continue to practice law for
lucre or malice. I have no doubt many lawyers like Alan Dershowitz and
even his adversary Bob Barr would like to see me tortured or beat to
death by like H. Pail Rico was. Do you see how easily I predicted his
demise. That was a nobrainer. What say you? Do you wish to assist me
or not? If not give my friend, Byron Prior a call. Now there is man in
great need of a good lawyer with a sense of social conscience and a
bit of integrity to boot. Every Canadian should feel offended by T
Alex Hickman.
Mr. MacKay thanks for proving to the world what a lawyer’s word is
worth even when he signs his hand to it. Your little back stabbing
trick with David Orchard proved my point in spades. I really don’t
know what Orchard is whining about. Hasn’t he heard a few lawyer jokes
in his time on the planet? Much truth is told in jest. Check my work
before you call me a liar. From one Maritmer to another if you asked
me to step outside I would smile and quit talking and start swinging
immediately. I am a much better man than that fat bastard that went to
Harvard and you can tell him I said so. My question to you sir, is do
you wish to call me a liar and then step outside to settle it or argue
me in Court? Better yet, do you and the fat bastard wish to tag team
against me or go at me one on one in court or out of it? All that I
have said is true. I read where the fat bastard lost a hundred pounds
in order to help get reelected. If I did that I would be half the man
I am now but I would still have enough sand left to take you both on.
The MacKay Clan should be ashamed of you. How is that for picking a
fight? EH?
Ms. Davidson, please find enclosed the documents proving I did what
was required of me on July 6th in order to get my deposit back. When
may I expect the money? Why would your help call me about this stuff
without checking with Ms. Chappell first? You always referred me to
her. It is not my fault if you lose the records. Right?
Ms. Davidson, I have another couple of very important questions as
well. When I appeared at the local Canada Elections Office with my
secretary and a witness as required, Ms Chappell would not allow me to
begin the process of registering as a Canidate until she received a
call from some unnamed lawyer from Ottawa. I know that person must
have been you or someone who spoke for you.
Ms. Chappell was waiting for you, Ms. Davidson to decide as to whether
or not I could run for Parliament. I can easily prove byway of phone
records and emails that I had resolved these issues months ago with
the top dogs in your office long before an election was ever called. I
then did it once again after the election was called and then again
with Ms. Chappell before I returned to Canada and then the day before
coming to her office. The deliberate delay was obvious to all and very
offensive. What would have Rob Moore or John Herron’s friend David
Lutz have done if you had tried such a trick with them, Sue you? Why
should I be any different? I do have the same Rights. If you don’t
think I would be just as diligent as any lawyer when protecting my
rights, you have seriously underestimated me. Call my bluff. I dare
ya.
Ms Davidson, you are not a judge nor are you a Member of Parliament.
You have no right to make a law or decide on it. If there was some
sort of legal question why did you not address it months ago with me?
It was my opinion that you were simply delaying me until the clock
tolled two o’clock and then I would not be allowed to have my name on
the ballot. I truly believe you were acting in the best interest of
other lawyers rather that upholding the Public Trust placed in you.
When I kept demanding to just know your name or to talk to you, I was
denied that right. However I did manage to become a candidate by
exactly two o’clock because you knew as sure as I am typing this that
I would have complained of you in a heartbeat after two o’clock. What
say you Ms. Davidson? Do you disagree with my opinion of what happened
on June 7th? If you were not the lawyer attempting to illegally delay
me then that person was acting under your authority. Correct? You are
the Deputy Chief Electoral Officer and Chief Legal Counsel. I am just
the self appointed Chief of my little Clan but as you can see I have
no fear of arguing with fancy upper Canadian lawyers. Do you wish to
explain or should I summons you to court to get an answer? Again I ask
when do I get my money back? My accountant has filed his work quite a
while ago as well. What is the reason for the delay now? Ain’t it
kinda funny how the Queen would not take my check but I must accept
hers?
Ms. Verma, I recall our conversation vividly and can easily prove my
following contacts with you. I already know the answer but my only
question to you is WHY?
As I continue my legal battles in the USA, I want you all to know that
win or lose I was trying to protect your rights too against the
bastards that created the DHS etc.
Cya’ll in Court:)
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
More laws won't mean less terror
Experts warn of 'giving the devil the benefit of the law'
Law Times By David Gambrill
Expanding the power of criminal law will not stop terrorism, say legal
academics, and may instead lead to the permanent imposition of
extraordinary emergency measures and concentrated state power.
Quoting a character in the Robert Bolt play, A Man for All Seasons,
Oren Gross, a Benjamin Cardoso School of Law professor, issued a
general warning against "giving the devil the benefit of the law" in
order to make the public feel more secure.
"Extravagent terrorist attacks such as those on Sept. 11 tend to bring
about a rush to legislate," Gross told a legal scholars' conference
convened to discuss the federal government's new antiterrorism
legislation, bill C-36. "The preventative relief [is thought to] be,
'If only we add new powers to police, if only we add to the Criminal
Code, if only we revamp and reinvigorate existing offences, then our
nation is going to be secure.'"
But such logic tends to lead to a concentration of power at the level
of government, he says. Citizens may relinquish their civil liberties
out of fear, encouraging the state "do whatever it takes" to make
terrorism stop, he says.
"Governments tend to overreact," says Gross. "Terrorism from below
may, to some extent, be replaced with terrorism from above." Legal
scholars who spoke at the conference echoed Gross' caution. Some
worried that Canada is permanently entrenching the temporary emergency
powers found in the 1988 Emergencies Act.
"My answer to the question, 'Can emergency powers be normalized?' is
yes, they can be," says U of T law professor David Dyzenhais, a South
African studying the emergency powers employed by the South African
government under apartheid. "But when they are normalized, what we
have is a violation of the spirit of the rule of law."
U of T math professor Peter Rosenthal, a lawyer at Roach Schwartz and
Associates in Toronto, suggested the federal government should have
used its powers under the 1988 Emergencies Act instead of drafting new
anti-terrorist legislation.
Enacted by the Mulroney government, the Emergencies Act gives the
federal government limited exceptional powers to deal with four types
of emergencies: threats to public welfare, threats to public order,
international emergencies, and war.
International emergencies, says the act, arise "from acts of
intimidation or coercion, or the real or imminent threat of serious
force or violence."
For an international emergency, the act can be put into affect for 60
days and must be reviewed by Parliament before the deadline can be
extended. It includes powers to limit or restrict travel, ban public
assemblies, remove non-citizens from the country, and enter and search
premises without a warrant. The powers in the act are explicitly
subject to the Charter.
The Emergencies Act replaced the War Measures Act, which the Trudeau
government used to arrest and detain 465 Quebeckers in 1970. The
federal government invoked the War Measures Act after the FLQ
kidnapped Quebec provincial cabinet minister Pierre Laporte, who was
found assassinated one day after the act was declared.
The so-called "October Crisis," when the War Measures Act was
implemented, started a debate in Canada about when it is appropriate
to suspend civil liberties. The Trudeau government came under heavy
criticism for employing the act.
U of T constitutional law professor Lorraine Weinrib noted the federal
government has studiously avoided using the language of "emergency
measures," even though it has incorporated such emergency powers into
its anti-terrorist legislation. The same emergency powers are
available under the Emergencies Act, she says, albeit for limited
periods of time and under strict supervision of Parliament.
"I would say the government did not use the Emergencies Act here in
response to the problem of terrorism because it did not want to engage
in this type of review process," says Weinrib. "It preferred to
continue what has been highly discredited under the War Measures Act
experience - namely, the concentration of power in the executive."
For this reason, many scholars at the conference encouraged the courts
to review the legislation carefully. Federal government lawyers have
called the proposed anti-terrorist legislation"Charter-proof." But
that doesn't mean the anti-terrorism legislation should be enacted,
says U of T law professor Kent Roach.
"We may too quick to accept . . . what the government's lawyers — or
indeed any lawyers — conclude it is permissible to do," he says.
Roach listed several extraordinary police powers found in bill C-36.
Most notably, the bill allows police to arrest and detain a person
without a warrant, on suspicion the suspect may be carrying out a
terrorist activity. It also creates "investigative hearings," in which
suspects are compelled to give testimony that might incriminate them.
Roach was particularly critical of the hearing process, the powers of
which, he insisted, haven't been around since the English 'Star
Chamber' in 1641.
"Compelling a person to talk to the police in an investigation in
which he or she may well be implicated offends our traditions of
respect for the right of silence during police investigations," he
says. "These traditions date back to the abolition of the Star Chamber
in 1641."
The Star Chamber, associated with the English Courts, was reviled for
its use of torture. As late as 1614, a Somerset clergyman, Edmond
Peacham, was interrogated on the rack before the Star Chamber in the
presence of the attorney general at the time, Sir Edward Coke.
Roach acknowledged the bill gives detained individuals the right to
counsel at such hearings, but such representation provides cold
comfort. "It gives people subject to investigative hearing the right
to counsel — even though, in many cases, the lawyer will simply have
to inform the target that he or she must talk or else face prosecution
or continued detention," he says. One danger in forcing people to talk
is that they might lie, says Roach. A combination of perjury and
prosecutorial zeal could may lead to the kind of wrongful convictions
associated with the "Birmingham Six" and "Guilford Four" in England,
he says.
In the early 1970s, the IRA bombed pubs in Birmingham and Guilford,
England, killing more than 21 people. Under pressure to convict the
terrorists, police arrested 10 people in connection with the attacks.
In 1989 and 1991, respectively, a British court of appeal released the
Guilford Four and Birmingham Six after finding they had been wrongly
convicted.
This article does not constitute legal or other professional advice
and no responsibility for any loss occasioned to any person acting or
refraining from action in reliance upon material contained in this
article is accepted by the author or Canada Law Book Inc.
(c)Law Times Inc. 2004. All rights reserved.
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Bachrach, Barry A.
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 10:04 AM
Subject: Fw: A True Tale of Two Corrupt Governments
Barry as you can see Byron and I have been very busy in Canada and the USA.
If you know of an ethical lawyer in Canada, perhaps they should make an
appearance on his behalf on February 9th. It would help in Graham's defence
immensely. Meanwhile down here I have hurried up and then stalled things. On
April 30th Methinks I will start picking my jury then I will call you to
testify. However I may be suing Lauren before that time. The hearing I
needed you for was Oct 1st. but you didn't come so I went to jail. the
following are the latest filings in Byron and I matters as of Jan 21st
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Ind80@aol.com ; kbar@nbnet.nb.ca ; Herbert Snider ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca ;
2mollins@sympatico.ca
Cc: scotta@parl.gc.ca ; andrew.holland@nb.aibn.com
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 9:18 AM
Subject: A True Tale of Two Corrupt Governments
Hey Fellas
Yesterday in the Supreme Court of Newfoundland my friend, Bryon Prior
gave his word to a court he knows to be very corrupt not to publish or
cause to have published some of the following documents in order for Judge
J. Dereck Green not to throw him in jail. I have no doubt he will keep his
word. Byron should not be punished for my actions in the necessary defence
of my freedom in another country. Byron also also informed the court that
there is no way for him to put a muzzle on me.
I am sending this email out to men that I trust that have my Durable
Power of Attorney. Whether the bastards like it or not you are me in word
and deed as long as I keep breathing. All of you and the court know I must
make these matters widely known in order not to be put back in jail. As you
all know I gave my fair warning to all of publishing the words within this
email before Byron was compelled to make his promise. The Rules of
Newfoundland Supreme Court do not hold nor do they mean a Tinker's damn to
me until I am named and properly invited to the circus. I would gladly stand
as a defendant beside Byron after the Court publishes that fact so it
becomes widely known the reasons for my coming home. However it is
painfully obvious that the Newfoundland Supreme Court and Byron Prior must
wait until my present pending criminal trial in the USA is over before I can
become joined in a civil matter up home. Never forget my native land denied
me any assistance in trying to stop my being persecuted down here and sent
straight to jail without due process of law. At least in compensation Canada
is sending down Franky MaKenna to speak for me as I sue his law firm. Won't
that be interesting?
The sexual abuse of Byron 's family long ago and wrongful actions
within the Offshore Oil Industry in Newfoundland are far more important to
everyone in Newfoundland and the rest of the Maritimes than my arguments
about Securities Fraud, Tax Fraud and dead ex Fbi agents etc. with Yankees.
That said, my must protect my freedom and my own family's interests first
before I can help anyone else. I am certain my friends agree and I thank you
for your help. Whereas no lawyer would come to Byron's assistance, I did as
best I could do from afar to study the rules and write what I could for
Byron to use in his defence and counterclaim to expose the truth and to use
in my own defence in the USA. The serious mischief that is afoot is within
the ex parte doings of the desperate law firm Patterson and Palmer and a
very corrupt justice system to have Byron's document stricken after they had
demanded them of him. John Crosbie's partner Stephen J. May speaking on
behalf of his own law firm and Billy Matthews a Member of Parliament was
forced to agree with Byron's inablitity to put a muzzle on me. As anyone can
see Stevey Boy May in his Affidavit has admitted to the knowledge of the
reasons why I am very angry with his law firm's malice towards Byron and I.
The fact that May refused to file his Affidavit and the court refused
to accept Byron's document requesting a postponement today should prove to
all what Byron and I say is true. If anyone wishes to view exactly the same
documents as were served upon Patterson Palmer and their cohorts up home or
upon the Suffolk County District Attorney down here, all they have to do is
ask. I will fill their email inbox with scans in a Tiff format. All the
documents have been filed in the Public Record during the course of my
criminal trial and there are many more to follow. Many Canadian Politicians
have received exactly the same material from me and many have answered me.
the most recent Respond came from Senator Joe Day yesterday after a five
month delay. Any ethical lawyer could easily employ them in Byron's defence
and to support his counterclaim. Judge Green has ordered him to find a
lawyer to defend him "pro bono" by February 9th. Byron and I hold no
illusions about the impossible task. He has already emailed every lawyer
within the Newfoundland Law Society asking for assistance and not one has
responded before he stood in court yesterday. What is truly necessary is an
ethical Royal Commission to investigate T. Alex Hickman and his friends in
order for the truth to be revealed.
Since we all know that the Liberal Caucus is now in Fredeicton. I ask
that my friends take many of their friends and go see the MP Andy Scott
today and ask him why he did not respond to the material I delivered in hand
to his office with Dave Mollins before I returned to the USA. The fact that
I was falsely imprisoned makes me very angry with people such as Andy Scott
and his cohorts who are employed to uphold the Public Trust. As a Member of
Parliament he could have stopped this nonsense out of the gate. As the
Minister of Indian Affairs he certianly should have contacted my friend the
lawyer Barry Bachrach by now. I called his office today and told them to
expect some sincere men to turn up with some simple but serious questions
for him. I also forwarded him this email to share with the Liberal Caucus
now in Fredericton.
Please find within this email three Motions and an Affidavit of mine in
a Yankee Court and A court order in Newfoundland with the related Defence,
Counterclaim and Request of byron Prior all of which I wrote. Most
importantly is an Affidavit by the crooked lawyer Stevey Boy May.
Spotlight on N.B. culture for national Liberal caucus retreat
Maritime Kitchen Party welcomes Prime Minister, cabinet to Province
Fredericton (N.B.) – New Brunswickers are putting on a really big show for
Prime Minister Paul Martin and his Liberal caucus when they come to
Fredericton later this month.
The National Liberal Caucus Winter Retreat will bring the 135 Liberal
Members of Parliament, including Mr. Martin’s entire cabinet, as well as the
61 Liberal Senators to the Capital City for three days of meetings. The
retreat is co-hosted by Tobique-Mactaquac MP and Chairman of the National
Liberal Caucus Andy Savoy and Hon. Andy Scott, Fredericton MP and Minister
of Indian and Northern Affairs.
A Maritime Kitchen Party, Wednesday, January 26, will feature a full evening
of New Brunswick-flavoured food, song and dance, from toe-tapping Acadian
reels to high-stepping Scottish jigs.
The party headlines Fredericton’s own Downtown Blues Band, Bairdsville
singer and songwriter Matt Andersen, the multi-talented La Famille Arsenault
and fiddling sensation Dominque Dupuis of Dieppe with Moncton comedian
Marshall Button, better known as Lucien, as emcee.
“This is a one-of-a-kind occasion to share our rich cultural heritage with
the leaders of our nation,” Mr. Savoy said. “We are proud to be an example
of cultural diversity and harmony to the rest of Canada.”
“We want to give our friends in Ottawa the kind of warm welcome that New
Brunswickers are noted for,” Mr. Scott said. “This will be a showcase of our
heritage and hospitality.”
The Maritime Kitchen Party is open to the public and will begin at 8 p.m. at
the Delta Fredericton ballroom. Tickets are now on sale at all MP
constituency offices in New Brunswick, as well as the New Brunswick Liberal
Association office in Fredericton. For further information, contact the NBLA
1-800-442-4902;
Office of Andy Savoy at 1-866-542-4400 or the Office of Andy Scott, (506)
452-4110.
Office of the Hon. Andy Scott
Towne Centre Building
412 Queen Street
Suite 100
Fredericton, N.B.
E3B 1B6
Phone: (506) 452-4110
Fax: (506) 452-4076
This is the fella I just called.
Andrew Holland
Excutive Assistant
Phone: (506) 452-3516
Read this fellas and then go cause the Liberals that are having to
much fun at our expense to weep and worry about their own malevolent
interests. Ask them if they still wish to support the Diddlers T. Alex
Hickman and their buddy Billy Matthews. At the very least tell everybody to
call Andy Savoy and Andy Scott and ask them the same question Lois Skanes
asked of Stevey Boy May. Who the Hell is David Amos and what the Hell is he
talking about?
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
THE TRIAL COURT
DORCHESTER, SS.
DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT
THE COMMONWEALTH OF )
MASSACHUSETTS )
CRIMINAL ACTION
) DOCKET NO. 0407CR004623
v.
)
)
DAVID R. AMOS )
)
MOTION TO DISQUALIFY THE OFFICE OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ON THE BASIS THAT A CONFLICT OF INTEREST
EXISTS THAT WOULD RENDER IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE
DEFENDANT,
DAVID R. AMOS TO RECEIVE A FAIR TRIALNow comes the defendant, David R. Amos
a Citizen of Canada and a Legal Permanent Resident of the USA within the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts and demands that the Office of the Suffolk
County District Attorney be disqualified from prosecuting this matter. This
motion is based on the affidavit previously filed with the clerk of this
court and recorded in the public record, the court herein and such matters
as may be presented at the hearing on this motion and points to his civil
rights under the following authority: the Declaration of the Rights of the
Inhabitants of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts PART THE FIRST Article XII
which states as follows: "No subject shall be held to answer for any crimes
or offence, until the same is fully and plainly, substantially and formally,
described to him; or be compelled to accuse, or furnish evidence against
himself. And every subject shall have a right to produce all proofs, that
may be favorable to him; to meet the witnesses against him face to face, and
to be fully heard in his defense by himself, or his counsel, at his
election. And no subject shall be arrested, imprisoned, despoiled, or
deprived of his property, immunities, or privileges, put out of the
protection of the law, exiled, or deprived of his life, liberty, or estate,
but by the judgment of his peers, or the law of the land." The defendant
legally acting ithin his rights was imprisoned.
In support of this motion, the defendant states that on October 1st, 2004 he
returned from safe haven in Canada to stand once more before Judge Coffey of
this court as ordered. The judge witnessed the signing the aforesaid
affidavit. This was done prior to any hearing of this matter in a court not
recognized by the defendant as having the proper jurisdiction and venue for
a trial of a Canadian citizen involving serious criminal charges with an
unsigned complaint. The defendant was well aware that if he were to be
convicted of the false charges he would be subject to a prison term and the
revocation of his status as a permanent resident of the USA and that his
family would suffer greatly. The plaintiff went to great lengths to inform
the correct Canadian authorities of his persecution in the USA. Judge Coffey
witnessed the defendant serve the District Attorney and also provide the
clerk of this court an exact copy of the aforesaid affidavit before he
properly disqualified himself from hearing this matter as soon as he was
informed that he lives the defendant’s neighborhood. This was done before
the defendant was ever served a complaint that he would be compelled to
answer. Attached to the aforesaid affidavit are two large exhibits
containing one or more affidavits and many other legal documents etc. that
prove the malicious actions of the District Attorney supporting a criminal
conspiracy against the freedom, civil rights, interests and property of the
defendant.
In further support of this motion the defendant states that beginning in
July of 2004, the defendant had fully disclosed to the District Attorney the
circumstances of this matter before the Clerk Magistrate Owens went forward
and filed his malicious complaint.
The defendant had every right to expect the District Attorney to uphold the
law and properly warn the Clerk Magistrate not to attempt to make an illegal
compliant. Instead the District Attorney attempted to explain the illegal
action while claiming not to be involved. In response the defendant received
a letter from the District Attorney dated July 29th, 2004. In it the DA
claimed that he as not yet involved but attempted to explain the impending
illegal action of the Clerk Magistrate on August 13th, 2004. A true copy of
the aforesaid letters to and from the District Attorney in July of 2004 are
hereto attached for the court to review.
On September 3rd the District Attorney proved his malice and even demanded
imprisonment or bail to make certain that the defendant answer an unsigned
complaint that had yet to be served. Judge Coffey properly denied the DA’s
request, ordered the DA to serve the defendant copies of all that was in the
docket of the matter and ordered a hearing of the matter on October 1st in
order establish the legality of the complaint and the proper jurisdiction
and venue. The judge suggested that the defendant file the documents he had
shown to the court byway of a proper means on October 1st and then he would
hear if the District Attorney wanted to continue to prosecute the matter.
To date the defendant has not heard from or received on slip of paper from
the District Attorney other than the documents comprising of this complaint
ordered by Judge Coffey on Sept 1st. If there was in fact a signed complaint
against the defendant dated August 13th, 2004, it should have been served
upon him at that time not by Judge Hanlon after he was compelled to waive
his right to counsel in order to receive swift justice. The defendant does
have three separate copies of an unsigned complaint. One is of the court’s
record, one is of the prosecutor’s copy and the last is the defendant’s
copy. The defendant strongly believes that the signed copy of the complaint
was created October 1st, 2004 after the District Attorney had asked for a
recess and studied the defendant’s affidavit. That fact should have been
blatantly obvious to the court and Judge Coffey because the District
Attorney’s Office had asked to confer with the defendant before he filed the
affidavit but afterwards they did not wish to continue with their own
request.
It became blatantly obvious to the defendant and his witnesses that the
court and the DA were cohorts in the conspiracy against him as they watched
the clerk of this court give the District Attorney their copy of the
affidavit that that had been filed in the Public Record before Judge Hanlon
had the matter called before her on October 1st. On that day Judge Hanlon
did inquire about the last statement in the defendant’s affidavit and of his
concerns with the well being of his friend Byron Prior in Newfoundland and
of the defendant’s own concerns with Canada. The defendant told the judge as
much as she was willing to hear before she sent the defendant to jail based
on the false allegations of an ADA claiming that Judge Coffey was
threatened. The allegations were absurd. If Judge Coffey had in fact felt
threatened then he would have dealt with the defendant immediately. After
the defendant was put in jail many Canadian authorities act quickly to cover
up their own conspiracy against the defendant and Bryon Prior. At the time
of the writing of this document a law firm of a well-known Canadian
politician, John Crosbie has made a statement of claim against Byron Prior
on behalf of the Member of Parliament Bill Matthews while ignoring the very
same material that was served upon the Suffolk County District Attorney and
this court on October 1st. That matter will be addressed in Canada. However
on October 19th as the defendant stood before Judge Hanlon, she clearly
affirmed the fact that Judge Coffey had not been threatened but did nothing
to chastise the ADA for her false allegations and denied that the original
wiretap tapes served upon the District Attorney on Sept 3rd were any sort of
evidence in this matter even though the Clerk Magistrate had made note of
their existence on August 13th. Thus there is a need to sue the District
Attorney and the court.
Dated January 11th, 2005
David R. Amos, Pro Se
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
617 698-6549
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, David R. Amos of Milton, MA hereby certify that on January 12th,
2005, I with two friends accompanying me as witnesses served upon the
Suffolk County District Attorney, Daniel F. Conley a true original copy of
the attached Motion to his office within Dorchester District Court at the
following address 510 Washington St. Dorchester, MA
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
THE TRIAL COURT
DORCHESTER, SS.
DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT
THE COMMONWEALTH OF )
MASSACHUSETTS )
CRIMINAL ACTION
) DOCKET NO. 0407CR004623
v.
)
)
DAVID R. AMOS )
)
MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE SIDNEY HANLON ON THE BASIS THAT A CONFLICT OF
INTEREST EXISTS THAT WOULD RENDER IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE DEFENDANT, DAVID R.
AMOS TO RECEIVE A FAIR TRIAL
Now comes the David R. Amos, a Citizen of Canada and a Legal
Permanent Resident of the USA within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
herein named as the defendant and demands that Judge Sidney Hanlon be
disqualified from hearing all further proceedings in the above stated
criminal prosecution because of her personal interest in the outcome. In
support of this motion, the defendant has attached a true copy of a letter
received by Cynthia A. Robinson, the legal counsel of Boston Municipal Court
on January 4th,.2005 and a true copy of the docket sheet of this matter.
Also attached to the aforesaid letter is a copy of an email that was served
upon the Suffolk County District Attorney and a Judge of Dorchester District
Count on November 19th, 2004. Within the email are the irrefutable facts
that support the defendant’s statements within an Affidavit and its attached
exhibits filed in the Public Record of this court on October 1st, 2004 and
ordered removed by Judge Hanlon on Oct 19th after she admitted that the
defendant did not threaten Judge Coffey. The defendant freely admits that
this is a very important trial about Criminal Harassment. However he has
always maintained the Criminal Harassment has been practiced by the court
against him. The defendant maintains his declaration of innocence and only
demands his right to a swift trial in front of a jury of his peers in the
proper jurisdiction and venue.
. As of this date the defendant has not received a response from Ms.
Robinson either in the spoken or written word to refute his allegations of
criminal activity supported by many people employed to up hold the law and
the public trust in their elected or politically appointed positions within
the justice systems of Canada and the USA. Whereas this motion was the last
day to file this motion according to law and ordered by this court in order
for it to be heard on January 21st, 2005, the defendant must make it well
known to the court that he is about to sue the court to regain lost assets
and seek relief for personal injury. Whereas it was Judge Hanlon who willing
supported with documents signed in her own hand the malicious actions of the
Clerk Magistrate Mr. Owens and the false allegations of the District
Attorney, the defendant demands that she be disqualified. The fact that
Judge Hanlon went even further and maliciously declared that she believed
the defendant had a prior history of mental illness and did not believe his
actions within the Canadian justice system and the Parliamentary process was
very offensive to the defendant. Please view attachments bearing her
signature.
Dated January 11th, 2005
David R. Amos, Pro Se
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
617 698-6549
CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE
I, David R. Amos of Milton, MA hereby certify that on January
12th, 2005, I with two friends accompanying me as witnesses served upon the
Suffolk County District Attorney, Daniel F. Conley a true original copy of
the attached Motion to his office within Dorchester District Court at the
following address 510 Washington St. Dorchester, MA
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
THE TRIAL COURT
DORCHESTER, SS.
DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT
THE COMMONWEALTH OF )
MASSACHUSETTS )
CRIMINAL ACTION
) DOCKET NO. 0407CR004623
v.
)
)
DAVID R. AMOS )
)
MOTION OF THE DEFENDANT, DAVID R. AMOS TO DEMAND THAT THE MATTER
BE SENT TO US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
IN ORDER THAT HE MAY RECEIVE A FAIR TRIAL BY A JURY OF HIS PEERS IN THE
PROPER JURISDICTION AND VENUE.
Now comes the defendant, David R. Amos a Citizen of Canada and a Legal
Permanent Resident of the USA within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and
demands his right to a swift trial before a jury of his peers in order to
defend his freedom in the proper jurisdiction and venue of the US District
Court for the District of Massachusetts. The defendant has already spent
time in a malicious Sheriff’s jail in a clear and irrefutable violation to
his Eighth Amendment rights. He asserts his rights as follows and prays that
the Dorchester District Court to make note that there are two other directly
related motions filed along with this motion and that they should be heard
first. The aforesaid motions demand that the entire office of the Suffolk
County District Attorney and Judge Hanlon be disqualified because of their
interest in the outcome of this matter. This motion is based the affidavit
previously filed with the clerk of this court and recorded in the public
record, the court herein and such matters as may be presented at the hearing
on this motion.
In support of this motion the defendant states that he is being prosecuted
for criminal harassment byway of emails on behalf of the lawyer, Angela
Troccoli whom he has been litigating against in the USA for years. One of
the emails that she claims as harassment contain pictures of police
surveillance tapes that contain recordings of the private conversations of
several people that reside outside of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The
Boston Municipal Court does not have jurisdiction to even begin prosecution
particularly in light of the fact that the Minister of Justice who is also
the Attorney General of Canada received the email that the court finds so
offensive before the lawyer Troccoli received her forwarded copy and made
her false allegations. If the emails were in fact criminally offensive then
David Lutz QC, a lawyer who litigates on behalf of the Attorney General of
Canada in the Province of New Brunswick should have filed a complaint
against the defendant while he was on Canadian soil. The defendant was
running against the candidate Mr. Lutz was supporting for the same seat in
Canada’s Parliament. On July 29th, 2004, the very same day that the Suffolk
County District Attorney was composing his malicious letter, the defendant
was confronting David Lutz in front of many witnesses including the RCMP in
Sussex Provincial Court in the Province of New Brunswick. David R, Amos who
was yet to be charged with anything was demanding an answer for the many
documents served upon David Lutz in his capacity as a prosecutor for the
Queen in June of 2004. Mr. Lutz’s only answer was that he had given the
material to law enforcement. It appeared to the defendant that a solicitor
appointed to speak on behalf of the Queen was content in allowing a Clerk
Magistrate of a Boston Municipal Court to attempt to prosecute the defendant
in order to assist in the cover up his own wrongs. The defendant’s
suspicions have since been affirmed many times over in many ways.
In further support of this motion the defendant states that he must call
many witnesses to testify in his defense in federal court. Many of these
people act under the federal code of law enforcement. If they had acted
within the scope of their employment years ago then it would not have been
necessary for the defendant to run for Parliament in Canada let alone stand
trail as an innocent man being criminally prosecuted in order to protect the
political interests of so many others. Indeed the defendant will joyfully
argue a criminal matter in defense of his freedom in order to expose the
rampant public corruption the people of the two countries that he is a
person of know to exist.
In further support of this motion, the defendant states that on October 1st,
2004, Judge Coffey of this court witnessed the signing the aforesaid
affidavit which has since been removed from the public record under Judge
Hanlon’s orders. This was done prior to any hearing of this matter in a
court not recognized by the defendant as having the proper jurisdiction and
venue for a trail of a Canadian citizen involving serious criminal charges
in an unsigned complaint. The defendant was well aware that if he were to be
convicted of the false charges he would be subject to a prison term of up
two and one half years and the revocation of his status as a permanent
resident of the USA and that his family would suffer greatly. Attached to
the aforesaid affidavit are two large exhibits containing one or more
affidavits and many other legal documents etc. that prove the malicious
actions of the District Attorney and this court supporting a criminal
conspiracy against the freedom, civil rights, interests and property of the
defendant. The defendant will have the aforesaid affidavit and many other
documents and wiretap tapes to support this motion with him in court on
January 21st, 2005. The defendant would refuse to give this material to the
Federal Bureau of Investigation or any other law enforcement authority
because he now needs it as evidence to be used against them in a civil
lawsuit. The material proves that he has been pleading for years fo law
enforcement authorities to act within the scope of their employment. Perhaps
the District Attorney Daniel Conley upon reading this motion should
reconsider and ignore Judge Hanlon’s opinions of the wiretap tapes that he
has in his possession then give tapes to the FBI as soon as possible. He has
ten days to review all that the defendant has provided him appear as an
ethical officer of the court. A true copy of the aforementioned affidavit is
hereto attached for the court to review.
Dated January 11th, 2005
David R. Amos, Pro Se
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
617 698-6549
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, David R. Amos of Milton, MA hereby certify that on January
12th, 2005, I with two friends accompanying me as witnesses served upon the
Suffolk County District Attorney, Daniel F. Conley a true original copy of
the attached Motion to his office within Dorchester District Court at the
following address 510 Washington St. Dorchester, MA
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton,
MA. 02186
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
THE TRIAL COURT
DORCHESTER, SS.
DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT
THE COMMONWEALTH OF )
MASSACHUSETTS )
CRIMINAL ACTION
) DOCKET NO. 0407CR004623
v. )
DAVID R. AMOS )
)
AFFIDAVIT OF DAVID
R. AMOS
Now comes, David R. Amos, a Citizen of Canada and a Legal Permanent Resident
of the USA and asserts his Constitutional Rights pursuant to Title 42
Sections 1981, 1982, 1985 and 1986 of the Federal Code and freely swears
under the penalties of perjury that the following statements are true and to
the best of his knowledge.
1.. On September 3rd, 2004 I returned to the USA and stood before the
Dorchester District Court in response to a summons served upon my home in
Milton MA dated August 13th, 2004.
2.. On September 3rd, 2004 I reported to the probation officer as ordered
after he joked and made fun of me he directed me to serve upon the District
Attorney the many original wiretap tapes that I had promised I would bring
to court and ask if they wished to continue. The District Attorney Office
wished to prosecute me so I returned to the probation office and the
required documentation was filled out. I did not discuss the matter with
anyone working for the Commonwealth on September 3rd or since that time
other than register my indignation about the lack of diligence, professional
behavior and malicious acts practiced against me in an effort to impeach my
character.
3.. On September 3rd, 2004, before any hearing of the matter began I
protested the fact that the Clerk Buckley had claimed that I was pleading
not guilty. I had made no plea whatsoever. I refused to waive any of my
Rights and I demanded that the court prove its jurisdiction to hear the
matter.
4.. For over a period of almost three months I had tried to resolve the
issues of this matter with the Clerk’s Office of this court, the Boston
Police Dept., the Police Commissioner, the City’s Legal Dept. the Mayor’s
office, the Suffolk County District Attorney’s Office, The Governor’s
Office, the US Ambassador to Canada, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. CSIS
and the Canadian Consulate in Boston. I was refused the right to know what
the allegations against me were and no one would discuss my concerns about
the possibility of foul play. I knew I had done nothing wrong and I had
fully disclosed the circumstances to the Suffolk County District Attorney as
Chief Justice Robert A. Mulligan had suggested. I had received an answer
from the DA weeks before he was willing to prosecute me on false charges. I
had no understanding of the matter. I had not been given information to work
with and no one would speak to me. If the District Attorney Daniel F. Conley
had acted ethically and diligently the lawyer, Angel Troccoli and her
cohorts within the law firm of Dane M. Shulman should have been the ones
charged with criminal actions against me.
5.. On September 3rd after the hearing and another hearing was marked for
today October 1st, Judge Coffey ordered ADA attempting to prosecute me to
give me a copy of the documents that I was entitled to view. In return I
gave her my Canadian contact number so that we may confer about this matter.
I then returned to Canada to defend my rights and freedom. The ADA never
called. I was not surprised because upon viewing the material provided I
discovered that there is in fact no complaint against me.
6.. The complaint in this matter is not signed or witnessed by anyone.
Apparently the DA did not expect me to make it to court on September 3rd and
certainly did not wish to discuss it with Canadian authorities. I now
consider the DA Conley to be just another corrupt politician just like Tom
Finneran and further proof of why it was so necessary for me to go to Canada
and run for Parliament in order to speak in a public forum of my knowledge
of public corruption. I gave all the crooks to the last possible minute for
one to act ethically and uphold the Public Trust. All I got in return was
continued harassment with the little perk of Colonel Foley quitting his job
before I left and Tom Finneran quitting his as soon as I got back. It
appears that I must complain of the Queen and President Bush if no one in
public service is willing to uphold the law and act within the scope of
their employment.
7.. For the record I must state the reason I was alarmed by this malicious
action against me. The fact is it was the Trail Court of Massachusetts on
April 1st, 2003 that had made false allegations against me to agents of the
DHS claiming that I had threatened the life of George W. Bush. Now the same
court was demanding that I return to the USA to stand in court and answer
charges it knew to be false the morning after the President’s big Political
Speech in New York. I had no doubt whatsoever that the DHS would pounce on
me at the border and use a policy of rather than safe than sorry upon me and
take me away for the benefit of many a low man in high places. The RCMP
would do nothing to protect me and in fact attempted to run me out of Canada
on Sept 2nd That was the very day of the Republican National Convention was
much in the news about protests and presidential propaganda. In order to be
of no possible threat to the President I was compelled to come to the USA
after the President left New York and drive all night in order to appear in
court on the morning of the 3rd.
8.. The most alarming fact of all is that everybody knows that I am bounty
hunting for Whitey Bulger. The order to come to his old stomping grounds and
amongst his friends by the same corrupt justice system that allowed him to
practice his criminal behavior for so long and then allow him to escape
justice is indeed a very malicious summons.
9.. April 1st, 2003 was also the only day that I ever met with the lawyer,
Angela Troccoli before Sept 3rd. I argued her before Judge Livingstone in
Plymouth Probate Court. I have argued her again in Norfolk Probate Court on
Sept. 21st, 2004. That court found it necessary for no stated reason to
place six court guards around me. I am far more than a mere acquaintance to
her but obviously a rather formidable litigant against her criminal actions.
I did send her emails asking her to ask her clients to stop harassing me
with attached photos of the proof. The emails were necessary because she
would not return my phone calls and sent my correspondence to her partner
Dane M. Shulman to Barry Bachrach claiming that I was his client. I am not
and never was. Mr. Bachrach had informed Troccoli many times that he only
represented my wife, Jean F. O’Meara because the court had Stricken my right
to do so pursuant to M.G.L 201B.
10.. Barry Bachrach has now withdrawn from all of my wife’s matters with
my assent because of a conflict of interests over one of his partners and
myself about a fraudulent Title V inspection. However he is an important
witness to be called because he has complete knowledge of all my contact
with Troccoli during the time frame that I have been accused.
11.. Barry Bachrach also has several original wiretap tapes in his
possession in case the ones given to the District Attorney have disappeared
like so much of my other material has.
12.. On April 1st, 2003 I became aware that Troccoli and the Massachusetts
Trial Court had practiced fraud against me and had created a Notice of
Appearance in my name with a false document in order to strike me and cover
up their own wrongs.
13.. On April 1st, 2003 I had also spoken to a Judge in Quincy District
Court in my best effort to have the court place a restraining order against
my brother in laws William, Robert and Brian O’Meara in my name because
after I had tried to do so a few days before in my wife’s name under her
Durable Power of Attorney the court laughed at me and denied it. Within a
day of my first appearance in Quincy District Court William O’Meara called
my wife at her work and implied that the homes would burn down and he was
willing to pay the insurance premiums. Those same insurance premiums were
continued to be paid by us and one policy was canceled over one month after
the property in Plymouth was destroyed by Troccoli clients. The Plymouth
Probate Court called a Trial quickly with no notification to the litigants
after Sept 3rd and on September 9th it authorized a very fraudulent real
estate sale about a property that had been illegally destroyed for five
months.
14.. The lawyer Troccoli and the Massachusetts Trial Court have been
assisting the criminal actions of my brother in laws and many others in
order to protect the interests of many lawyers and politicians from my
actions in other courts.
15.. My wife’s family have forged her signature on a Purchase and Sale
Agreement, created fraudulent Title V inspection, broke into our home,
assisted in the theft of her rightful inheritance, stolen personal property
and food, made false allegations against me in other states, threatened to
burn down the homes and harassed us on sometimes a daily basis with the
knowledge and assistance of several Police Departments. It is time we sought
relief.
16.. Whereas two of my most recent documents have disappeared from the
Public Record in two countries I have attached them to this affidavit for
the court and the public to view. Exhibit A is a Motion to Dismiss Troccoli’s
latest malicious action. It was filed on September 13th, 2004 and stricken
from the Public Record by Judge Langlois on September 21st. Exhibit B is a
copy of two letters with the same enclosures that were sent to the RCMP in
Newfoundland byway of the Canada Post and one was sent to the Canadian
Consulate by US Mail. Both mailings were tracked and not received. They are
obviously now in the possession of some sort of secret authority. As the
court views these documents it can easily see what I say is true and my
material is of no concern for the public safety. They are filed in the
public record for the benefit of all in my best effort to see that the
Public Trust is upheld. I have also brought to court a case of documents
requested by Utica Mutual Insurance Company of New York to investigate the
actions of their client Jan Whiting. However once they knew the truth they
refused to accept or pay for what they had requested. If the court deems it
necessary I shall file it into evidence to refute the false allegations made
against me.
17.. Since I have last appeared in this court a great deal has transpired
that cannot be told of within this affidavit but it concerns the pursuit of
justice for many people in two counties. Much has been done by many to stop
my friends and I in revealing the truth of our concerns. Thus far we have
been able to thwart our adverasies actions. The court should pray that it
does not get our blood on its hands. The proof of some of what I state can
be found in Exhibit B.
Signed
before the court and
under
the Pains and
Penalties
of Perjury by
Dated October 1st , 2004
David R.Amos, Pro Se
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
617 698-6549
CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICEI,
David R. Amos hereby certify that on October 1st, 2004, I
served upon the Suffolk County District Attorney Daniel F. Conley a true
copy of this document with all its attachments.
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
2005 01 T 0010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
TRAIL DIVISION
BETWEEN: WILLIAM MATTHEWS
PLAINTIFF
AND: BYRON PRIOR
DEFENDANT
AND BETWEEN: BYRON PRIOR
DEFENDANT/PLAINTIFF BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: WILLIAM MATTHEWS
PLAINTIFF/FIRST DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: T. ALEX HICKMAN
SECOND DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: THOMAS MARSHALL
THIRD DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: DANNY WILLIAMS
FOURTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: EDWARD M. ROBERTS
FIFTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: JOHN CROSBIE
SIXTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: PATTERSON PALMER
SEVENTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
ORDER
Before the Honourable Chief Justice Green.
Filed January 21, 2005
UPON HEARING Stephen J. May, of Counsel for the Plaintiff, AND UPON READING
the Application and Affidavit filed herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, until
further order of the court, Byron Prior is prohibited from publishing,
causing to have published, distributing or causing to have distributed the
Statement of Defence and Counterclaim pending the determination of the
Applicant’s Application to strike the Statement of Defence and Counterclaim
in its entirety, and that the Court’s file in this proceeding is not to be
made available for review by anyone other than the parties or their legal
counsel pending the determination of the Applicant’s Application to strike
the Statement of Defence and Counterclaim in its entirety, and that the
requirements relating to the obligations of the Defendants to the
Counterclaim to file Defences are be waived pending the determination of the
Applicant’s Application to strike the Statement of Defence and Counterclaim
in its entirety. AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the content of the Statement
of Defence and Counterclaim shall not be published or broadcast in any
manner whatsoever until further order of the court.
AND IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the Application to strike the
Statement of Defence and Counterclaim is scheduled to be heard on January
26, 2005.
AND IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that costs of this Application be in the
cause.
DATED at St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador this 21st day of January,
2005.
Signed by J. Derek Green, Chief Justice
2005 01 T 0010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
TRAIL DIVISION
BETWEEN
WILLIAM MATTHEWS
PLAINTIFF
and:
BYRON PRIOR
DEFENDANT
DEFENCE
1.. The Defendant, Byron Prior, admits to the statements of the plaintiff,
William Matthews in the paragraphs numbered one (1), two (2) and seven (7)
of his claim.
2.. Defendant, Byron David Prior (Prior) and his friend David Raymond Amos
(Amos) With respect to this claim for damages by a Member of Parliament,
have no understanding how the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador can
legally proceed with this civil matter until the Attorney General Thomas
Marshall (Marshall) and the Premier Danny Williams (Williams) answer the
Defendant’s and Amos’ criminal allegations proven to them in September of
2004. The Defendant has the right to know the results of any of the Attorney
General’s investigations of his concerns about Public Corruption before any
proceedings in this matter. Furthermore Amos’ as a candidate for a seat in
Parliament in the last election certainly deserves an answer from the Arar
Commission. That Commission has ignored him and allowed him to be illegally
imprisoned in the United States of America (USA) long after it was made
irrefutably aware of his supporting evidence to Mr. Arar’s matters. Every
Member of the 37th and the 38th Parliament has been made well aware of the
facts of this matter by the Defendant and Amos for over one year byway of
email if not hard copy in the mail or personal service. The Defendant and
Amos are just members of the Public but they demand that those in Public
Service uphold the Public Trust and expose Public Corruption.
3.. The Defendant further states that hard copy of much evidence of many
crimes practiced against the Defendant and Amos were given to Williams by
the Defendant on September 9th, 2004 and to Marshall by the Lieutenant
Governor Edward Moxon Roberts (Roberts) on September 10th. On September
11th, the Governor General of Canada Adrienne Clarkson (Clarkson) affirmed
to Amos that he had taken the appropriate steps and properly contacted all
authorities having jurisdiction over his and the Defendant’s concerns about
criminal actions. In support thereof Defendant states the Deputy Prime
Minister Anne McLellan (McLellan) of the 37th Parliament had directed Amos
to do so in December of 2003 and the Defendant was directed to do so by the
Minister of Justice Irwin Cotler of the 38th Parliament in July of 2004.
Both aforesaid persons are members of the same Liberal caucus as the
Plaintiff now seated on a backbench in Parliament.
4.. The Defendant further states that former law firm of Williams had
successfully defended him in a criminal trial against other false
allegations and charges of criminal acts in 1998. At that time law firm
Williams was completely informed by the Defendant of the sexual abuse of his
family. The Defendant has no doubt Williams used that knowledge to become
the powerful person of his political party he is today rather than assisting
his client, the Defendant in attempting to up hold the law and see that
criminals with other politically powerful positions be properly prosecuted.
5.. The Defendant further states that whereas this claim of much
embarrassment of the Plaintiff as a Member of Parliament, he feels no pity
towards a man that had practiced sexual abuse against his family and was
never punished.
6.. The Defendant clearly states in his web site (Site) and now in this
document signed in his own hand that every word he has published is the
truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help him his God.
7.. The Defendant further states that whereas this claim by the Plaintiff
against him comes about byway the words he legally published in his web site
("Site") published in the USA under the First Amendment its Constitutional
pursuant to the freedom of speech and the freedom of the press, the onus is
upon the Plaintiff to prove without any reasonable doubt that the Defendant’s
allegations are false. The defendant is well prepared to argue that every
word he has ever said or written about the Plaintiff is true and he is
willing to call many witnesses to support the true facts of this matter.
8.. The Defendant further states as he does within his Site that the
quickest way for the Plaintiff to prove one of the allegations false without
burdening the court would be a few blood tests to prove he is not the father
of the person named Aaron whom he chooses to mention within paragraph three
(3) his own statement of claim. That is a very small task for a Member of
Parliament to do in order to help protect his reputation and save himself
from a lot of further embarrassment.
9.. The Defendant further states that he does in fact welcome this claim
against him. Plaintiff has finally given the Defendant an opportunity to see
justice served upon the plaintiff and his cohorts after over forty years of
seeking it for over fifty years of much abuse. Hopefully this will be done
byway of this answer and a very justifiable counterclaim that should not be
easily dismissed. It is quite honestly the only way a man on welfare can
make a legitimate complaint against some of wealthiest and most corrupt
persons in Canada.
10.. The Defendant further states whereas the Plaintiff complains that the
published words of the Defendant can be found on the Internet, other web
sites and within many emails etc, the Plaintiff should complain all the
other persons that support the Defendant allegations as well. Otherwise this
malicious claim is fruitless to stop the justifiable embarrassment of the
Plaintiff and his lawyers.
11.. The Defendant further states if the claim against a layman on welfare
were to be won by the legal trickery of a malevolent wealthy law firm it
would merely support all what the Defendant has published is true. If the
Plaintiff truly wishes to protect his reputation in a legal fashion he must
prove with witnesses and evidence in front of a jury that all the
allegations of the Defendant are false. The Plaintiff merely claiming
falsehoods does not prove the allegations untrue.
12.. The Defendant further states that the Plaintiff makes mention of many
emails in his statement of claim paragraphs numbered five (5) and six (6)
containing the Defendant’s published work. The Defendant states that one of
the persons to send thousands of emails in support of the Defendant and his
allegations is his friend Amos. The defendant points out the fact that Amos
had sent emails containing the entire text of the Defendant’s Site to every
Member of the 37th Parliament before he came to Canada to run for a Seat in
the June Election of the 38th Parliament. One of the persons to respond to
Amos’ emails was an assistant of McLellan as the Deputy Prime Minister and
Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness on March 16th 2004.
That person sent back the entire text of the Site the Plaintiff finds so
offensive. The Plaintiff should name McLellan as a defendant.
13.. The Defendant further states that Amos would welcome the opportunity
to be joined into this matter as a defendant and argue the lawyers he has
already crossed paths with his own matters and the Defendant’s during the
time he was in Canada running for a seat in Parliament. If any Member of
Parliament including the Plaintiff had acted ethically one year ago. Amos
would not have been imprisoned to sleep on a cement slab in the Physc Ward
of a Downtown Boston Jail while being illegally held against his will under
the false charges of "other" until the Yankees could think of something to
charge him with. Furthermore the statement of claim of the Plaintiff would
not exist and the Defendant would not be still suffering today from more
abuse by the Judicial System.
14.. The Defendant further states that this answer and many other
documents etc. involving the governments of Canada and several Provinces
including Newfoundland will be used in defence of Amos’ freedom during the
course of his pending Criminal Trial before a jury of his peers in the USA.
However this answer in this civil matter is no less important for the
Defendant because the justice system of his own province has failed to
uphold the law with regards to the crimes practiced against him for over
forty years.
15.. The Defendant states in defence of Plaintiff’s claim in paragraph
numbered three (3) that the lawyer Stephen J. May ("May") of the law firm of
Patterson Palmer acting for the Plaintiff, the benefit of his own law firm
and many others maliciously edited many words from the very first statement
in the Defendant’s Site This is a very fraudulent attempt by a lawyer to
exclude the names of many other parties who should be plaintiffs as well if
in fact the Plaintiff’s claims were valid. For the sake of brevity demanded
by the rules of this court the defendant offers only the first statement in
the Site because that is where his edited words were gleaned from in the
plaintiff’s third statement of his claim. The first words of the Site in
their entirety are as follows:
Canadian Corruption Sexual Abuse & Political & Legal Conspiracy.
RCMP Incompetence & Cover up. Priors Of Grand Bank NFLD Canada
How do I get a corrupt legal system to investigate, charge and convict
itself? If T. Alex Hickman, Justice Minister, 1966 to 1979 also Health
Minister 1968 to 1969 and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland
1979 to 2000, 34 YEARS OF COMPLETE LEGAL SYSTEMS CONTROL, at 41 years of
age, rapes and impregnates your younger sister Susan, at 12 years old, what
would you do? Liberal MP Bill Matthews & his friends, raped the same child
repeatedly, for more than 3 Yrs. At 14 ,she had a second baby, Aaron, she
said she was 80% sure he is Matthews son. A third baby, Harriett, at 18 & 3
miscarriages also, by this time, what abuse of a child. Matthews & his
lawyer, Ed Roberts, pressured me to sign papers, saying Matthews had nothing
to do with my family & I imagined it all. NOT SO. I have copies of their
letters. 2 weeks after I signed these papers, MR ED, THE HORSE'S ASS,
ROBERTS was made LT. Governor of NFLD. & LAB. by MR JEAN, THE JACK ASS,
CHRETIEN, soon to be known as Canada's most CORRUPT Prime Minister After the
Justice Minister, Rapes & Impregnates a 12 Yr. old child, in a small town &
everyone knows, who will stop or charge anyone else, for Raping & abusing
that same child?? PAUL MARTIN, IS THIS FEDERAL ENOUGH FOR YOU OR MUST I NAME
MORE LAWYERS & JUDGES?? DO SOMETHING NOW or I will be forced to name many
more, RESPECTABLE NEWFOUNDLANDERS, many names you won't like to read
yourself. I am willing to take any tests and answer all questions regarding
my entire life. All they have to do is take one blood test. It's time for
them to stop manipulating our legal system and face the truth, which I have
be telling anyone else who would listen, all of my life.I didn't just awake
one morning and decide to accuse the most powerful and most corrupt legal
animal in this province. I have had, no childhood, no education, no family,
no hometown, no self- esteem or self-respect and no past, present or future
as a contributing person. By the time I was 14 years old I was responsible
for 9 younger children, all of us abused and molested while our hometown
either joined in, bothered us about our situation, or looked the other way
and said we were all trouble………
16.. The Defendant altered the above statement published within the Site
in October of 2004 upon taking the advice of Amos after he had been released
for jail on bail. Amos advised the Defendant take back his promise to the
Plaintiff’s lawyer Roberts years ago and tell all that he knew to be true
about all things as soon as possible for their own protection and the
benefit of all Canadians.
17.. The Defendant further states that one of the aforesaid named parties
in his published Site Roberts is a former partner of the law firm Patterson
Palmer. In 2002 acting on behalf of the Plaintiff with the assistance of the
law firm of Patterson Palmer. Roberts, the well-known and powerful political
lawyer had maliciously threatened to sue the unemployed Defendant and his
family if his client’s name was ever mentioned in the Defendant’s Site as it
existed at that time.
18.. The Defendant further states that it was not the Defendant’s fault
that the Plaintiff’s guilty conscience about his own sexual abuse of
children had compelled him to hire lawyers to cover up his crimes. However
the defendant buckled under Roberts’ pressure and signed a document
promising never to mention the Plaintiff within the Site;
19.. The Defendant further states that at that time in of his encounter
with Roberts in 2002 and until October of 2004 the Defendant was seeking
justice for the sexual abuse of his family by T. Alex Hickman (Hickman), the
former Minister of Justice and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. That fact
was plainly stated for the world to view from the very beginning of the
Defendant’s first published web site. Not once over the years did Hickman
openly refute the Plaintiff allegations but he did indeed send many of his
cohorts employed within law enforcement and others to harass the Defendant.
20.. The Defendant further states that within mere months of the Defendant’s
signature on the documents demanded by Roberts he was appointed the 11th
Lieutenant Governor of Newfoundland and Labrador. The defendant has no doubt
whatsoever it was a political reward to Roberts for protecting the false
integrity of a Member of Parliament with a very guilty conscience within
Jean Chrétien’s scandalous government. The fact that May employs the phrase
"inter alia" which means "among other things" does not indeed negate the
fact that he is a deliberate conspirator in a scheme to cover up Public
Corruption assisted and practiced by members of his own law firm of
Patterson and Palmer.. The Defendant demands to argue all of his published
words not just the words a malicious lawyer has chosen to take out of
context to suit his own ends. Justice would not be served again.
21.. The Defendant further states that the following words found within
his published Site were also edited by May within the Plaintiff’s fourth (4)
paragraph of his claim for the same aforesaid reasons stated in paragraph
number two (2) of this defence. The complete context of the Defendant’s
words are as follows:
To Whom It May Concern:
July 24, 2001
My name is Byron Prior. I'm the oldest living of these 12 children. I not
only had to livethrough my abuse but, watch as the rest of my sisters and
brother were abused and raped. Three of my sisters raped, 1 by a grandfather
at the age of 4, a second raped by T. Alex Hickman, Justice Minister, at age
12 & Bill Matthews & friends from 13 on. A third sister raped by a young man
in our home town. The legal system are onlyconcerned with keeping all this
under cover and protect themselves. Please people, if you have a heart, walk
one day in my shoes and tell me you would just forget because these
bureaucrats say so. I have copies of my full statement on all the details of
what happened, which I gave the R.C.M.P. on March 9, 1998, 52.5 hours at
their office. I will send it to anyone who will send me an E-mail address. I
will never forget the abuse, shame, and persecution to this day, from the
animals who did this to my family.
Sincerely,
Byron Prior
22.. The Plaintiff should have joined as plaintiffs T. Alex Hickman,
Edward M. Roberts, Jean Chretien and Paul Martin the persons first mentioned
in the Site and numerous others including many members of the RCMP and the
justice system named throughout the remainder of the Site pursuant to Rule
7.02 (2) which states as follows: Subject to the provisions of any statute
and unless the Court otherwise orders, a plaintiff, who claims any relief
that any other person is entitled to jointly with the plaintiff, shall join
all persons so entitled as parties to the proceeding, and any of them who do
not consent to be joined as a plaintiff shall be made a defendant. The fact
that the lawyer May carefully edited the defendant’s published work in the
plaintiff’s statement of claim does not negate the fact that many parties
are named within the Defendant’s Site.
23.. The Defendant further states in answer to the Plaintiff’s statement
of claim paragraph six (6) that denies his allegations of the criminal
actions made on his published Site against the Plaintiff and many others are
false. The defendant clearly states that all of his allegations made against
all parties mentioned within the Site are absolutely true and he has sworn
to the truth of some of the stated allegations the Courts of Newfoundland in
the past. The text of one of his statements to the RCMP can be found on the
published Site. The Plaintiff desires the Freedom of Speech and the Freedom
of the Press in another country to be ignored in order to save himself from
embarrassment from his own wrongful acts for which he has never been
prosecuted and punished because of his association with T. Alex Hickman, the
former Minister of Justice an Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of
Newfoundland and Labrador.
24.. The Defendant clearly states that the Plaintiff, Bill Matthews and
his cohorts living in Grand Bank many years ago used against the Minister of
Justice at the time, their knowledge of the sexual abuse of the minor
children of the Prior family by T. Alex Hickman’s in order not to be
prosecuted for their own many crimes including their own sexual abuse of the
same family. The Plaintiff has continued to prosper ever since that time
because of crime not integrity. The Defendant will not take back one word of
his truthful publications in the USA. The defendant prays to the court for
his right to a jury trial in his own native land in accordance with all the
rules of the Supreme Court in order to call many witnesses in support of his
defence to insure that the truth about many criminal acts become widely
known in order that all the perpetrators including the Plaintiff, William
Matthews and the Former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland
and Labrador, T.Alex Hickman may be finally prosecuted for the sexual abuse
of his family and himself. The Defendant prays that the crimes against his
family will never be forgotten, never repeated upon anyone and never covered
up by any Judicial System ever again.
25.. In closing the Defendant, Byron Prior sincerely believes that the
conspiracy by so many highly placed public officials over the past forty
years to cover-up the crimes of others warrants an investigation by a Royal
Commission immediately. .
DATED at Conception Bay South Newfoundland and Labrador this 21st day of
January, 2005.
Byron Prior
Reader’s
Crescent,
Conception Bay,
NL A1W 5B4
The Defendant
TO: Stephen J. May
PATTERSON PALMER
Suite 1000, Scotia Centre
235 Water Street
P.O. Box 610
St. John’s, NL. A1C 5L3
Solicitors for the plaintiff
2005 01 T 0010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
TRAIL DIVISION
BETWEEN WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF
and
BYRON PRIOR
DEFENDANT
AND BETWEEN BYRON PRIOR
PLAINTIFF
and
WILLIAM MATTHEWS
T. ALEX HICKMAN
THOMAS MARSHALL
DANNY WILLIAMS
EDWARD M. ROBERTS
JOHN CROSBIE
PATTERSON PALMER
DEFENDANTS
COUNTERCLAIM
1.. The Plaintiff, Byron Prior was born and raised Grand Bank
Newfoundland. He is an out of work former employee of the offshore oil
exploration industry who is now on social assistance. He has been unable to
find employment in the area of his expertise because his outspokenness in
the 1980’s about oil industry matters that caused Crosbie Offshore Services
to be investigated for its wrongful acts. The aforesaid company was then
controlled by Andrew Crosbie, brother to John Crosbie a former Minister of
Justice of Canada
2.. The Defendant, John Crosbie, is now a partner in the law firm of
Patterson Palmer. He was served much evidence of many crimes including the
crimes practiced against the Plaintiff byway of his partner, Gregory Byrne a
former Minister of Justice of New Brunswick in Fredericton N.B. on August
24th, 2004. This was done by personal service by David Raymond Amos (Amos) a
friend of the Plaintiff.
3.. The Defendant, Edward M. Roberts was once a member the law firm of
Patterson Palmer who acted against the Plaintiff years ago on behalf of the
Defendant William Matthews. He knew the truth of the plaintiffs allegations
and did nothing to up hold the law in the pursuit of his own gain. On
September 8th, 2004, the Plaintiff made personal service upon Edward Roberts
as the Leutenant Governor of Newfoundland Hard irrefutable evidence proving
the crimes that concern his friend David Amos on the same day that Amos was
having a lawyer file the same documents attached to his affidavit in defence
of a friend unjustly charged with criminal behavior in a New Brunswick
Provincial Court in Sussex NB. Roberts continued to stay the course of his
deceit and merely passed the evidence on the Defendant, Thomas Marshall the
Attorney General of Newfoundland and Labrador who has done nothing
whatsoever to uphold the law. Marshall has refused to answer or return one
phone call or email in order answer or ask one question about the
allegations of crime by the plaintiff and his friend Amos.
4.. The Plaintiff further states the Defendant, William Matthews was born
and raised Grand Bank Newfoundland. on July 22, 1947. He attended Memorial
University and in 1969 he earned a B.P.E., B.Ed. He was first elected to the
Newfoundland and Labrador Legislature in 1982 as the MHA for the Grand Bank
District. He was re-elected in 1985 and was appointed Minister of Culture,
Recreation and Youth. In 1988, Mr. Matthews was appointed Minister of Career
Development & Advanced Studies. In 1989, Mr. Matthews was re-elected to the
Newfoundland and Labrador Legislature and was appointed Finance Critic. From
1990 to 1995, he served as Fisheries Critic, and in 1991 was appointed as
Opposition House Leader. In 1993, Mr. Matthews was again elected to the
Legislature and was re-appointed House Leader and Fisheries Critic. On June
2, 1997, he was elected as the Member of Parliament for Burin-St.George’s.
the Defendant did serve as Vice-Chair of the Standing Committees on
Fisheries & Oceans. On Sept 1st, 2000, he was appointed Parliamentary
Secretary to the President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada and
Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs. The defendant was re-elected November
27, 2000 as the Member of Parliament for Burin-St. George’s and re-appointed
September 1, 2001 as the Parliamentary Secretary to the President of the
Queen’s Privy Council for Canada and Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs.
The Defendant was reelected on June 28th, 2005 but is now a backbencher in
the Liberal caucus of 38th Parliament of Canada still representing the
constituency of Random-Burin-St. George’s having apparently fallen out of
favor with Paul Martin’s minority government.
5.. The Plaintiff further states he has no doubt that his actions are part
of the reason for the Defendant’s loss of Stature within the Liberal Caucus
and the cause of his stated embarrassment in paragraph number six (6) of his
statement of claim.
6.. The Plaintiff further states the Defendant, T. Alex Hickman was born
and raised Grand Bank Newfoundland. The Plaintiff whose mother was a whore
with Hickman as a client has known him since childhood. The Plaintiff
witnessed the fact that Hickman sexual abused his younger sibling at 12
years old on the night of his first political win in 1966. Hickman and his
associate John Crosbie rose to positions of great power and wealth beginning
under the corrupt leadership of Joey Smallwood before turning coat on the
Liberal party and climbing even higher on the political totem pole of Public
Corruption. Hickman finally retired as the Chief Justice of the Supreme
Court of Newfoundland and was later awarded the Order of Canada with the
courthouse in Grand Bank now bearing his wicked name.
7.. The Plaintiff has never made any secret of the fact that he hated and
despised the Defendants Matthews and Hickman ever since he was a child
chucking rocks in the street at Matthews’ big green fifties Chrysler as he
sped away to sexually abuse another one of the Plaintiff’s underage
siblings. Both the Plaintiff and Matthews knew that that he would never be
punished because of what everybody in Grand Bank never of the sexual
misdeeds of Hickman. The Plaintiff is grateful for the invention of the
World Wide Web in his lifetime in order that he may tell all who wish to
read of it what he knows to be true in Newfoundland. Now the Plaintiff can
hurl simple truths far and wide at the defendants done the Internet highway.
He will not stop telling the world the truth because the defendant, William
Matthews feels embarrassed and justifiably hated and despised by many
others. The Plaintiff is proud of his work legally published in another
country so that the crooks in his home Province of Newfoundland can no
longer keep their dirty secrets to themselves.
8.. Plaintiff was denied legal aid in this matter by the government
lawyer, John Duggan for no stated reason that the Plaintiff can find within
the Legal Aid Act. However the Plaintiff is well aware that he will never
receive any assistance from law enforcement or the judicial system because
of the cover up the sexual abuse of his family when he was a child by T.
Alex Hickman, the former Minister of Justice and the Chief Justice of the
Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador.
9.. The Plaintiff further states that when his friend Amos heard that the
Province was unwilling to offer legal to him or even look at the supporting
evidence from Amos they knew for certain all government employees in
Newfoundland were acting against the Plaintiff under orders from the Premier
Danny Williams. Amos did the best he could to help compose the Plaintiff’s
answer and countercomplaint within the time allowed by the rules of this
court.
10.. The Plaintiff further states that Amos also went one step further to
make certain their suspicion of the malice of Danny Williams was true. On
January 20th, 2005, Amos called Danny Williams’ office personally and asked
why he had not responded to the identical letter and materials Roberts,
Crosbie and the Newfoundland Law Society had received. The Plaintiff had
served it upon his office on September 9th and the receipt is signed by one
of his assistants. The aforesaid material also included a copy of a police
surveillance tape numbered 139 recorded in the USA of the mob. It letter
certainly warranted a valid answer for someone in law enforcement. However
later in the day another one of Danny Williams’ assistants called Amos back
and denied any knowledge of anything. That man’s words affirmed what the
plaintiff and his friend already knew and that is almost everyone employed
within the justice system is willing to be a liar and support Public
Corruption for their own personal gain. People employed in the Public
Service of law enforcement only act ethically and do their job if it
politically correct to do so in order to keep their job. It truly is just
that simple and everybody knows it. The plaintiff and his friend merely went
to great lengths to prove it after the Justice Systems of two countries had
practiced many crimes against each of them.
11.. The true facts of this matter are stated as best the Plaintiff could
in his answer to William Matthews now a defendant in this Counterclaim. For
the sake of brevity for the court, the benefit of the Plaintiff and the
Public Trust, the Plaintiff, Byron prays the court to review his answer
filed at the same time as this counterclaim in a timely fashion as per the
rules of this court.
12.. The Plaintiff is now prepared to reveal all that he knows to be true
about wrongful actions within the offshore oil exploration industry and to
be a supporting witness to the allegations of much Public Corruption within
Canada and the United States of America (USA) recently exposed by Amos. The
Plaintiff truly believes that is the reason he was served the malicious
claim against him by William Matthews at this time and compelled to answer
it on by January 21st, 2005 is because of the actions of actions of Amos in
the USA and his court ordered appearance in Dorchester District Court in
Boston Massachusetts on the very same day. All of the above named defendants
are involved in a cross border conspiracy to cover-up many crimes.
13.. The Plaintiff further states that he and his friend are well aware
that their knowledge and evidence of many crimes are a very serious and
legitimate threat to the false integrity of many persons employed to protect
the Public Interests of the people around the world. They have no doubt
whatsoever that their lives are in great danger. History has proven many
decent men acting as they have died for much less. However history has also
proven that if good men do nothing evil will prevail. The Plaintiff and his
friend have no choice but to proceed in their efforts to expose Public
Corruption because it is not in their nature to quit. They also recognize
the fact that as fathers they owe to their children what their forefathers
fought so hard in so many wars to secure for them, Freedom within a Just
Democracy.
14.. The Plaintiff further states that the sincere actions of he and his
friend to make what they know of many crimes become common knowledge has the
entire corrupt Justice Systems of Canada and the USA greatly concerned. If
the two friends do prevail in revealing the truth to all it will be to the
detriment of many malevolent Global Corporations, Bankers, Politicians,
lawyers and the most importantly the Catholic Church. There has been much
ado in recent times about the affiliations within such societies as Skull
and Bones and the involvement Presidents and Senators who attempt to appear
to be on the opposite side of the political fence. Politicians come and
every four years or so. However it is the puppet master that pulls the
strings who always remains behind the scene that is the one who is truly
obscene. The Plaintiff, Byron David Prior and his friend David Raymond Amos
want the world to know they truly believe their most evil foe is none other
than Count Peter-Hans Kolvenbach the Superior General of the
Jesuits.
15. The Plaintiff therefore claims:
a. general damages to be assessed;
b. aggravated, exemplary and/or punitive damages;
c. pre-judgment and post-judgment interest pursuant to the provisions of
the Judgment Interest Act, R.S.N. 1990, c. J-2;
d. cost on a solicitor if one is found and own client basis;
e. such further relief deems to be
equitable and just in the circumstances.
DATED at Conception Bay South Newfoundland and Labrador this 21st day of
January, 2005.
Byron Prior
Reader’s Crescent,
Conception Bay, NL
A1W 5B4
The Plaintiff
2005 01 T 0010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
TRIAL DIVISION
BETWEEN:WILLIAM MATTHEWS
PLAINTIFF
AND: BYRON PRIOR
DEFENDANT
AND BETWEEN: BYRON PRIOR
DEFENDANT/PLAINTIFFBY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: WILLIAM MATTHEWS
PLAINTIFF/FIRST DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: T. ALEX HICKMAN
SECOND DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: THOMAS MARSHALL
THIRD DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: DANNY WILLIAMS
FOURTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: EDWARD M. ROBERTS
FIFTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: JOHN CROSBIE
SIXTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: PATTERSON PALMER
SEVENTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
REQUEST FOR POSTPONEMENT
RE: An Amended Interlocutory Application of the Plaintiff to maintain an
Order of the Court restricting publication; to strike portions of the
Statement of Defence pursuant to Rule 14.24; and strike the Counterclaim in
it’s entirety pursuant to Rules 11.02 and 14.24 and ss. 93 and 94 of the
Judicature Act, RSN 1990, c. J-4 as amended.
(Inter Partes)
The Defendant/Plaintiff by Counterclaim in this proceeding requests a
postponement before attempting to argue the above stated Application served
upon him on January 25, 2005. In support thereof he states as follows:
1.. The Defendant/Plaintiff by Counterclaim is a resident of Conception
Bay South who is a layman on welfare with a Grade Eleven GED who has yet to
secure legal assistance in his defence and counterclaim in this matter and
is ordered by the court to argue a very long and very complicated memorandum
of law within one day of being served.
2.. The Plaintiff/Defendant by Counterclaim and Applicant is a resident of
Mount Pearl, Newfoundland and Labrador, and a Member of the 38th Parliament
of Canada who is represented in this action by the wealthy and influential
law firm of Patterson Palmer, which is also the Seventh Defendant by
Counterclaim.
3.. The Defendant by Counterclaim, Patterson and Palmer had acted hastily
and maliciously in an "ex parte" fashion in order to protect its own
interests in this matter and later was compelled to amend the first
Interlocutory Application it had composed in order to correct errors and
cover up the justifiable existence of the other Defendant by Counterclaim.
4.. The past managing partner of the Seventh Defendant by counterclaim,
Stephen J. May (May) had caused the above stated documents to be served upon
the Defendant/Plaintiff by Counterclaim in an admitted untimely fashion. May
promised not to oppose this request for postponement within a cover letter
signed in his own hand one day before the scheduled hearing, The text of May’s
letter states as follows:
Please find enclosed our further materials that now seek to strike
only portions of your Statement of Defence but still seeks to strike the
entire Counterclaim. Our Application also now seeks to refer this proceeding
to case management in order to address the service and scheduling of any
future Applications that may be brought in advance of a Trial. As I advised
previously, the Application is scheduled to be heard by the Supreme Court at
the Court House off Duckworth Street on Wednesday, 26 January 2005 at 10:00
a.m. The enclosed Affidavit has not been filed with the Court but I will
seek leave to do so on Wednesday. As weather prevented these documents from
being served yesterday, we will not oppose a request for a postponement to
allow you further time to prepare your position.
Signed by S, J. May
5.. May declares to have served upon the Defendant/Plaintiff by
counterclaim his own sworn Affidavit in which he has admitted to the prior
contact between himself, his law firm and other named Defendants by the
counterclaim with the Defendant/Plaintiff by counterclaim and David R. Amos
a willing Joiner in this matter pursuant to Rule 7 02.
6.. Whereas it appears that May does not wish to file his Affidavit in
this matter until the counterclaim has been stricken from the Public Record,
the Defendant/Plaintiff by counterclaim prays that the court allows May to
file his documents immediately and that his Affidavit and related Exhibits
be studied closely by the court before considering the Defendant’s latest
untimely Application.
DATED at Conception Bay South Newfoundland and Labrador this 25st day of
January, 2005.
Byron Prior
Reader’s Hill Crescent,
Conception Bay South, NL A1W 5B4
The Defendant/Plaintiff by Counterclaim
TO: Stephen J. May
PATTERSON PALMER
Suite 1000, Scotia Centre
235 Water Street
P.O. Box 610
St. John’s, NL. A1C 5L3
Seventh Defendant by Counterclaim and
Solicitors for the Plaintiff/Defendant by Counterclaim
2005 01 T 0010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF
NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
TRIAL DIVISION
BETWEEN:WILLIAM MATTHEWS
PLAINTIFF
AND: BYRON PRIOR
DEFENDANT
AND BETWEEN: BYRON PRIOR
DEFENDANT/PLAINTIFFBY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: WILLIAM MATTHEWS
PLAINTIFF/FIRST DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: T. ALEX HICKMAN
SECOND DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: THOMAS MARSHALL
THIRD DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: DANNY WILLIAMS
FOURTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: EDWARD M. ROBERTS
FIFTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: JOHN CROSBIE
SIXTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: PATTERSON PALMER
SEVENTH DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
SUMMARY OF CURRENT DOCUMENT Court File Number(s):2005 01 T 0010Date of
Filing of Document:25 January 2005Name of Filing Party or Person:Stephen J.
MayApplication to which Document being filed relates:Amended Application of
the Plaintiff/Defendant by Counterclaim to maintain an Order restricting
publication, to strike portions of the Statement of Defence, strike the
Counterclaim in it’s entirety, and to refer this proceeding to case
management.Statement of purpose in filing:To maintain an Order restricting
publication, to strike portions of the Statement of Defence, strike the
Counterclaim in its entirety and refer this proceeding to case management.
A F F I D A V I T
I, Stephen J. May, of the City of St. John’s, in the Province of
Newfoundland and Labrador, Barrister and Solicitor, make oath and say as
follows:
THAT I am a Partner in the St. John’s office of PATTERSON PALMER solicitors
for William Matthews, the Member of Parliament for Random-Burin-St. George’s
in the Parliament of Canada.
THAT Mr. Matthews originally retained Mr. Edward Roberts, Q.C. on or about
30 April 2002 after Mr. Byron Prior, the Defendant/Plaintiff by
Counterclaim, had made allegations against Mr. Matthews in a publication
called "My Inheritance - The truth - Not Fiction: A Town with a Secret". In
that publication, the allegation was made that Mr. Matthews had had sex with
a girl who had been prostituted by her mother. That girl was alleged to have
been Mr. Prior’s sister.
THAT upon being retained, Mr. Edward Roberts wrote a letter to Mr. Prior.
That letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit "1" to my Affidavit.
THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts’ letter to Mr. Prior, Mr. Roberts received a
1 May 2002 e-mail from Mr. Prior. That e-mail is attached as Exhibit "2".
THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts receipt of the e-mail, Mr. Prior swore an
Affidavit acknowledging that what had been said in that publication was
false. That Affidavit is attached as Exhibit "3" to my Affidavit. Following
Mr. Roberts’ receipt of that Affidavit, Mr. Matthews advised that he was
satisfied not to pursue the matter any further and our firm closed our file.
THAT on or about 25 October 2004, I was retained by Mr. Matthews following
his gaining knowledge that a web site, made a series of allegations against
him relating to my having sex with a girl of approximately 12 years old
through to an approximate age of 15 years old. It also accused him of being
a father of one of her children and accused him of having raped that girl.
Upon checking the web site I saw that Byron Prior, the Defendant, had been
identified as the author of the material on the site.
THAT Mr. Matthews instructed me to write Mr. Prior, to remind him of the
fact that the allegations had been admitted to being false through a 16 May
2002 Affidavit to advise him of Mr. Matthews’ intentions to commence legal
proceedings if the comments were not removed from the web site. A copy of my
letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit "4" to this Affidavit.
THAT I attach as Exhibit "5" a transcript from a 5 November 2004 voicemail
left by David Amos, identified in the voicemail as a friend of Mr. Prior.
THAT I attach as Exhibit "6" a portion of a 6 November 2004 e-mail from Mr.
Amos.
THAT until I received his voicemail and e-mail, I had never heard of Mr.
Amos.
THAT Mr. Amos has continued to send me e-mail since his 5 November e-mail.
Including his 6 November 2004 e-mail, I have received a total of 15 e-mails
as of 23 January 2005. All do not address Mr. Matthews’ claim or my
involvement as Mr. Matthews’ solicitor. I attach as Exhibit "7" a portion of
a 12 January 2005 e-mail that Mr. Amos sent to me but originally came to my
attention through Ms. Lois Skanes whose firm had received a copy. This
e-mail followed the service of the Statement of Claim on 11 January 2005 on
Mr. Prior. I also attach as Exhibit "8" a copy of a 19 January 2005 e-mail
from Mr. Amos.
THAT I attach as Exhibit "9" a copy of a 22 November 2004 letter addressed
to me from Edward Roberts, the Lieutenant Governor of Newfoundland and
Labrador covering a 2 September 2004 letter from Mr. Amos addressed to John
Crosbie, Edward Roberts, in his capacity as Lieutenant Governor, Danny
Williams, in his capacity as Premier of Newfoundland and Labrador, and Brian
F. Furey, President of the Law Society of Newfoundland and Labrador. I
requested a copy of this letter from Government House after asking Mr.
Roberts if he had received any correspondence from Mr. Amos during his
previous representation of Mr. Matthews. He advised me that he received a
letter since becoming Lieutenant Governor, portions of which involved his
representation of Mr. Matthews. Mr. Roberts’ letter also covered his reply
to Mr. Amos.
THAT I attach as Exhibit "10" an e-mail from Mr. Amos received on Sunday, 23
January 2005.
THAT I swear this Affidavit in support of the Application to strike Mr.
Prior’s counterclaim.
SWORN to before me at
St. John’s, Province of Newfoundland
and Labrador this 24th day of
January, 2005.
Signed by Della Hart STEPHEN J. MAY Signature
STAMP
DELLA HART
A Commissioner for Oaths in and for
the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador.
My commission expires on December 31, 2009.
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: pcavalluzzo@cavalluzzo.com
Cc: vverma@cavalluzzo.com ; Martin.P@parl.gc.ca ; Broadbent.E@parl.gc.ca ;
dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca ; Moore.R@parl.gc.ca ; Easter.W@parl.gc.ca ;
McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 7:17 AM
Subject: Fw: They read this stuff Monday
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: pierrebl@apex.gc.ca
Cc: florence.ievers@swc-cfc.gc.ca ; mskinner@cmhc-schl.gc.ca ;
donna.achimov@sdc-dsc.gc.ca ; line.lacombe-laurin@ccra-adrc.gc.ca ;
marie-josee.martel@ccra-adrc.gc.ca ; brian.keirstead@gnb.ca
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 8:11 AM
Subject: Fw: They read this stuff Monday
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: katherine.baird@csps-efpc.gc.ca
Cc: flapoint@ncc-ccn.ca ; ctherriault@pco-bcp.gc.ca ;
edouard.verrault@pwgsc.gc.ca ; pmcdowel@cmhc-schl.gc.ca ; huqm@tc.gc.ca ;
serge.rainville@sdc-dsc.gc.ca ; daniel.lavoie@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca ; Byron
Prior
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 8:00 AM
Subject: Fw: They read this stuff Monday
Everybody knows that politicians come and go It is wicked people like
Margaret Bloodworth and Eva Plunkett that hang around and run the show. Say
hey to them for me. Will ya?
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: brisos@parl.gc.ca
Cc: MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca ; info@fed.ndp.ca ; ndpadmin@fed.ndp.ca
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 7:40 AM
Subject: Fw: They read this stuff Monday
Scott say hey for me to Bloodworth and all the malicious public servants
yapping it up a APEX next month. Will Ya?
----- Original Message -----
From: Harper, Stephen - M.P.
To: motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 7:29 AM
Subject: RE: They read this stuff Monday
Thank you for your e-mail message to Stephen Harper, Leader of the
Opposition. Your views and suggestions are important to us. Once they have
been carefully considered, you may receive a further reply.
*Remember to include your mailing address if you would like a response.
If you prefer to send your thoughts by regular mail, please address them to:
Stephen Harper, M.P.
Leader of the Opposition
House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6
Mail may be sent postage free to any Member of Parliament.
You can also reach Mr. Harper by fax at: (613) 947-0310
Merci d’avoir écrit à Stephen Harper, le chef de l’opposition officielle.
Votre opinion est importante pour nous. Lorsque nous l’aurons étudiée avec
soin, nous pourrons vous faire parvenir une réponse.
*N’oubliez pas d’inclure votre adresse postale si vous voulez recevoir une
réponse.
Si vous préférez nous écrire en utilisant les services postaux régulièrs,
veuillez le faire au :
Stephen Harper, député
Chef de l’opposition officielle
Chambre des communes
Ottawa (Ontario) K1A 0A6
Vous pouvez écrire sans affranchissement à tous les députés fédéraux.
Vous pouvez également joindre M. Harper par fax au (613) 947-0310.
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Harper.S@parl.gc.ca
Cc: premier@gov.nl.ca ; tedcardwell@mail.gov.nf.ca
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 7:31 AM
Subject: Fw: They read this stuff Monday
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: rarespade@nfld.net
Cc: Byron Prior
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 7:28 AM
Subject: They read this stuff Monday
Liliana Longo Senior General Counsel
September 15th, 2004
C/o Assistant Commissioner Gerry Lynch
RCMP B Division Headquarters
100 East Hills Rd
PO Box 9700
St. Johns NF A1A 3T5
RE: Corruption
Hey,
Please find enclosed an exact copy of all material served upon
Lieutenant Governor Roberts by my friend Byron Prior. The copy of wiretap
tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence as law enforcement
authorities in order that it may be properly investigated. I have also
enclosed a copy of the correspondence between the RCMP External Review
Committee and I. As you review the same material they got, you can see the
folks in BC were contacted almost one year ago. Apparently the dumb bastards
don’t know how to read. If these are the best lawyers Anne McLellan has got
to send against me, the government is about to be embarrassed big time by a
simple Maritimer.
Whereas I have now received my answer from the Lieutenant Governor of
New Brunswick and the RCMP External Review Committee, I am about to file my
own complaints. I have given up on my native land protecting my dumb ass. If
you have any questions may I suggest that you take my matter up with Anne
McLellan or Jack Hooper.
With respect to my friend Byron Prior’s sad complaint, let me be the
first layman to congratulate the RCMP in the fine job they did covering up
his matters for the benefit many corrupt politicians for some many years. It
is too bad that the RCMP weren’t so diligent in upholding the law. Lets see
if I can have any luck tearing the mask of virtue off of the RCMP and the
likes of T. Alex Hickman for the benefit of all the simple folk like Byron
and I.
Shame on all of you. Say hey to the cop in the picture that was
guarding Harper on June 19th will ya? I need to know his name and summons
him to court to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
He can bring his god along to help if he thinks it necessary but I would
rather he bring his conscience. What say you? If I don’t get an answer from
you by Oct3rd. I will be due to sue you too. What do you think should I
complain of the RCMP in a court Newfoundland or New Brunswick?
I already know Byron’s answer.
Cya’ll in Court :)
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: fundshow@robtv.com
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 10:50 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: frankmag@rogers.com
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 11:35 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: leaders@ceocouncil.ca
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 6:46 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: george@nb.sympatico.ca
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 3:22 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: RADIATOR@nb.sympatico.ca
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 2:21 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: efh@unb.ca
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 1:58 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: kentfox@nbnet.nb.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 11:59 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: premier@gnb.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:15 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Chisholm.Pothier@gnb.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:08 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: submit@ftowncrier.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 1:22 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: editor@fredthepaper.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 12:53 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: digeo@nbnet.nb.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 12:29 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: oldmaison@yahoo.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 11:40 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Yelich.L@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:32 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
Roy.J@parl.gc.ca ; Saada.J@parl.gc.ca ; Sauvageau.B@parl.gc.ca ;
Savoy.A@parl.gc.ca ; Scherrer.H@parl.gc.ca ; Schmidt.W@parl.gc.ca ;
Scott.A@parl.gc.ca ; Serre.B@parl.gc.ca ; Sgro.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Shepherd.A@parl.gc.ca ; Skelton.C@parl.gc.ca ; Solberg.M@parl.gc.ca ;
Sorenson.K@parl.gc.ca ; Speller.B@parl.gc.ca ; Spencer.L@parl.gc.ca ;
St-Julien.G@parl.gc.ca ; St-Jacques.D@parl.gc.ca ; St-Hilaire.C@parl.gc.ca ;
St.Denis.B@parl.gc.ca ; Steckle.P@parl.gc.ca ; Stewart.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Stinson.D@parl.gc.ca ; Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca ; Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca ;
Szabo.P@parl.gc.ca ; Telegdi.A@parl.gc.ca ; Thibault.R@parl.gc.ca ;
Thibeault.Y@parl.gc.ca ; Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca ; Thompson.M@parl.gc.ca ;
Tirabassi.T@parl.gc.ca ; Tobin.B@parl.gc.ca ; Toews.V@parl.gc.ca ;
Tonks.A@parl.gc.ca ; Torsney.P@parl.gc.ca ; Tremblay.S@parl.gc.ca ;
Tremblay.St@parl.gc.ca ; Ur.R-M@parl.gc.ca ; Valeri.T@parl.gc.ca ;
Vanclief.L@parl.gc.ca ; Vellacott.M@parl.gc.ca ; Venne.P@parl.gc.ca ;
Volpe.J@parl.gc.ca ; Wappel.T@parl.gc.ca ; Wasylycia-Leis.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Wayne, Elsie - M.P. ; Whelan.S@parl.gc.ca ; White.R@parl.gc.ca ;
White.T@parl.gc.ca ; Wilfert.B@parl.gc.ca ; Williams.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Wood.B@parl.gc.ca
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Rock.A@parl.gc.ca
Cc: McNally.G@parl.gc.ca ; McTeague.D@parl.gc.ca ; Menard.R@parl.gc.ca ;
Meredith.V@parl.gc.ca ; Merrifield.R@parl.gc.ca ; Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca ;
Mills.B@parl.gc.ca ; Mills.D@parl.gc.ca ; Minna.M@parl.gc.ca ;
Mitchell.A@parl.gc.ca ; Moore.J@parl.gc.ca ; Murphy.S@parl.gc.ca ;
Myers.L@parl.gc.ca ; Nault.R@parl.gc.ca ; Neville.A@parl.gc.ca ;
Normand.G@parl.gc.ca ; Nystrom.L@parl.gc.ca ; Obhrai.D@parl.gc.ca ;
OBrien.L@parl.gc.ca ; OBrien.P@parl.gc.ca ; OReilly.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Owen.S@parl.gc.ca ; Pagtakhan.R@parl.gc.ca ; Pallister.B@parl.gc.ca ;
Pankiw.J@parl.gc.ca ; Paquette.P@parl.gc.ca ; Paradis.D@parl.gc.ca ;
Parrish.C@parl.gc.ca ; Patry.B@parl.gc.ca ; Penson.C@parl.gc.ca ;
Peric.J@parl.gc.ca ; Perron.G-A@parl.gc.ca ; Peschisolido.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Peterson.J@parl.gc.ca ; Pettigrew.P@parl.gc.ca ; Phinney.B@parl.gc.ca ;
Picard.P@parl.gc.ca ; Pickard.J@parl.gc.ca ; Pillitteri.G@parl.gc.ca ;
Plamondon.L@parl.gc.ca ; Pratt.D@parl.gc.ca ; Price.D@parl.gc.ca ;
Proctor.D@parl.gc.ca ; Proulx.M@parl.gc.ca ; Provenzano.C@parl.gc.ca ;
Rajotte.J@parl.gc.ca ; Redman.K@parl.gc.ca ; Reed.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Regan.G@parl.gc.ca ; Reid.S@parl.gc.ca ; Reynolds.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Richardson.J@parl.gc.ca ; Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca ; Robillard.L@parl.gc.ca ;
Robinson.S@parl.gc.ca ; Rocheleau.Y@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:29 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca
Cc: Hill.G@parl.gc.ca ; Hill.J@parl.gc.ca ; Hilstrom.H@parl.gc.ca ;
Hinton.B@parl.gc.ca ; Hubbard.C@parl.gc.ca ; Ianno.T@parl.gc.ca ;
Jackson.O@parl.gc.ca ; Jaffer.R@parl.gc.ca ; Jennings.M@parl.gc.ca ;
Johnston.D@parl.gc.ca ; Jordan.J@parl.gc.ca ; Karetak-Lindell.N@parl.gc.ca ;
Karygiannis.J@parl.gc.ca ; Keddy.G@parl.gc.ca ; Kenney.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Keyes.S@parl.gc.ca ; Kilger.B@parl.gc.ca ; Kilgour.D@parl.gc.ca ;
Knutson.G@parl.gc.ca ; KraftSloan.K@parl.gc.ca ; Laframboise.M@parl.gc.ca ;
Laliberte.R@parl.gc.ca ; Lalonde.F@parl.gc.ca ; Lanctot.R@parl.gc.ca ;
Lastewka.W@parl.gc.ca ; Lavigne.R@parl.gc.ca ; Lebel.G@parl.gc.ca ;
Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca ; Lee.D@parl.gc.ca ; Leung.S@parl.gc.ca ;
Lill.W@parl.gc.ca ; Lincoln.C@parl.gc.ca ; Longfield.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Loubier.Y@parl.gc.ca ; Lunn.G@parl.gc.ca ; Lunney.J@parl.gc.ca ;
MacAuley.L@parl.gc.ca ; Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca ; Macklin.P@parl.gc.ca ;
Malhi.G@parl.gc.ca ; Maloney.J@parl.gc.ca ; Mahoney.S@parl.gc.ca ;
Manley.J@parl.gc.ca ; Manning.P@parl.gc.ca ; Marceau.R@parl.gc.ca ;
Marcil.S@parl.gc.ca ; Mark.I@parl.gc.ca ; Marleau.D@parl.gc.ca ;
Martin.K@parl.gc.ca ; Martin.Pd@parl.gc.ca ; Martin.P@parl.gc.ca ;
Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca ; Mayfield.P@parl.gc.ca ; McCallum.J@parl.gc.ca ;
McCormick.L@parl.gc.ca ; McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca ; McGuire.J@parl.gc.ca ;
McKay.J@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:22 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Herron.J@parl.gc.ca
Cc: Duncan.J@parl.gc.ca ; Duplain.C@parl.gc.ca ; Easter.W@parl.gc.ca ;
Eggleton.A@parl.gc.ca ; Elley.R@parl.gc.ca ; Epp.K@parl.gc.ca ;
Eyking.M@parl.gc.ca ; Farrah.G@parl.gc.ca ; Finlay.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Fitzpatrick.B@parl.gc.ca ; Folco.R@parl.gc.ca ; Fontana.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Forseth.P@parl.gc.ca ; Fournier.G@parl.gc.ca ; Fry.H@parl.gc.ca ;
Gagliano.A@parl.gc.ca ; Gagnon.C@parl.gc.ca ; Gagnon.M@parl.gc.ca ;
Gallant.C@parl.gc.ca ; Gallaway.R@parl.gc.ca ; Gauthier.M@parl.gc.ca ;
Girard-Bujold.J@parl.gc.ca ; Godfrey.J@parl.gc.ca ; Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca ;
Goldring.P@parl.gc.ca ; Goodale.R@parl.gc.ca ; Gouk.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Graham.B@parl.gc.ca ; Gray.H@parl.gc.ca ; Grewal.G@parl.gc.ca ;
Grey.D@parl.gc.ca ; Grose.I@parl.gc.ca ; Guarnieri.A@parl.gc.ca ;
Guay.M@parl.gc.ca ; Guimond.M@parl.gc.ca ; Hanger.A@parl.gc.ca ;
Harb.M@parl.gc.ca ; Harris.R@parl.gc.ca ; Harvard.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Harvey.A@parl.gc.ca ; Hearn.L@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:17 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: bihal_sm007@rogers.com
Cc: pm@pm.gc.ca ; pmo@pm.gc.ca ; Abbott.J@parl.gc.ca ; Ablonczy.D@parl.gc.ca
; Adams.P@parl.gc.ca ; Alcock.R@parl.gc.ca ; Allard.C@parl.gc.ca ;
Anders.R@parl.gc.ca ; Anderson.D@parl.gc.ca ; Anderson.Da@parl.gc.ca ;
Assad.M@parl.gc.ca ; Assadourian.S@parl.gc.ca ; Asselin.G@parl.gc.ca ;
Augustine.J@parl.gc.ca ; Bachand.A@parl.gc.ca ; Bachand.C@parl.gc.ca ;
Bagnell.L@parl.gc.ca ; Bailey.R@parl.gc.ca ; Baker.G@parl.gc.ca ;
Bakopanos.E@parl.gc.ca ; Barnes.S@parl.gc.ca ; Beaumier.C@parl.gc.ca ;
Belair.R@parl.gc.ca ; Belanger.M@parl.gc.ca ; Bellehumeur.M@parl.gc.ca ;
Bellemare.E@parl.gc.ca ; Bennett.C@parl.gc.ca ; Benoit.L@parl.gc.ca ;
Bergeron.S@parl.gc.ca ; Bertrand.R@parl.gc.ca ; Bevilacqua.M@parl.gc.ca ;
Bigras.B@parl.gc.ca ; Binet.G@parl.gc.ca ; Blaikie.B@parl.gc.ca ;
Blondin-Andrew.E@parl.gc.ca ; Bonin.R@parl.gc.ca ; Bonwick.P@parl.gc.ca ;
Borotsik.R@parl.gc.ca ; Boudria.D@parl.gc.ca ; Bourgeois.D@parl.gc.ca ;
Bradshaw.C@parl.gc.ca ; Breitkreuz.G@parl.gc.ca ; Brien.P@parl.gc.ca ;
Brison.S@parl.gc.ca ; Brown.B@parl.gc.ca ; Bryden.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Bulte.S@parl.gc.ca ; Burton.A@parl.gc.ca ; Byrne.G@parl.gc.ca ;
Caccia.C@parl.gc.ca ; Cadman.C@parl.gc.ca ; Calder.M@parl.gc.ca ;
Cannis.J@parl.gc.ca ; Caplan.E@parl.gc.ca ; Cardin.S@parl.gc.ca ;
Carignan.J@parl.gc.ca ; Carroll.A@parl.gc.ca ; Casey.B@parl.gc.ca ;
Casson.R@parl.gc.ca ; Castonguay.J@parl.gc.ca ; Catterall.M@parl.gc.ca ;
Cauchon.M@parl.gc.ca ; Chamberlain.B@parl.gc.ca ; Charbonneau.Y@parl.gc.ca ;
Chatters.D@parl.gc.ca ; clark.j@parl.gc.ca ; Coderre.D@parl.gc.ca ;
Collenette.D@parl.gc.ca ; Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca ; Comuzzi.J@parl.gc.ca ;
Copps.S@parl.gc.ca ; Cotler.I@parl.gc.ca ; Crete.P@parl.gc.ca ;
Cullen.R@parl.gc.ca ; Cummins.J@parl.gc.ca ; Cuzner.R@parl.gc.ca ;
Dalphond-Guiral.M@parl.gc.ca ; Davies.L@parl.gc.ca ; Day.S@parl.gc.ca ;
Desjarlais.B@parl.gc.ca ; Desrochers.O@parl.gc.ca ; DeVillers.P@parl.gc.ca ;
Dhaliwal.H@parl.gc.ca ; Dion.S@parl.gc.ca ; Discepola.N@parl.gc.ca ;
Doyle.N@parl.gc.ca ; Dromisky.S@parl.gc.ca ; Drouin.C@parl.gc.ca ;
Dube.A@parl.gc.ca ; Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca ; Duhamel.R@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:13 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Connie Fogal
Cc: adamsw@sen.parl.gc.ca ; andrer@sen.parl.gc.ca ; angusd@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
atkinn@sen.parl.gc.ca ; austij@sen.parl.gc.ca ; baconl@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
bankst@sen.parl.gc.ca ; beaudg@sen.parl.gc.ca ; bironm@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
boldur@sen.parl.gc.ca ; brydej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; buchaj@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
callbc@sen.parl.gc.ca ; carnep@sen.parl.gc.ca ; carsts@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
chalit@sen.parl.gc.ca ; cochre@sen.parl.gc.ca ; chrisi@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
cohene@sen.parl.gc.ca ; comeag@sen.parl.gc.ca ; cookj@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
coolsa@sen.parl.gc.ca ; corbie@sen.parl.gc.ca ; cordyj@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
debanp@sen.parl.gc.ca ; days@sen.parl.gc.ca ; dininc@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
doodyw@sen.parl.gc.ca ; eytonj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; fairbj@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
ferrem@sen.parl.gc.ca ; finess@sen.parl.gc.ca ; finnei@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
fureyg@sen.parl.gc.ca ; fitzpd@sen.parl.gc.ca ; forrej@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
frasej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; gauthj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; gilla@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
grafsj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; grahab@sen.parl.gc.ca ; gustal@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
haysd@sen.parl.gc.ca ; hervic@sen.parl.gc.ca ; hublee@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
jaffem@sen.parl.gc.ca ; johnsj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; joyals@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
kellej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kennyc@sen.parl.gc.ca ; keonw@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
kinsen@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kirbym@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kolbel@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
kroftr@sen.parl.gc.ca ; lapiel@sen.parl.gc.ca ; lapoij@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
lawsoe@sen.parl.gc.ca ; lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca ; legerv@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
losier@sen.parl.gc.ca ; lynchj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; maheus@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
mahovf@sen.parl.gc.ca ; mahouf@sen.parl.gc.ca ; meighm@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
milnel@sen.parl.gc.ca ; moorew@sen.parl.gc.ca ; moriny@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
murral@sen.parl.gc.ca ; nolinp@sen.parl.gc.ca ; olived@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
pearsl@sen.parl.gc.ca ; pepinl@sen.parl.gc.ca ; phaleg@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
pitfip@sen.parl.gc.ca ; poulim@sen.parl.gc.ca ; poyv@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
prudhm@sen.parl.gc.ca ; rivesj@sen.parl.gc.ca ; roberf@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
roberb@sen.parl.gc.ca ; roched@sen.parl.gc.ca ; rompkw@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
rossie@sen.parl.gc.ca ; setlar@sen.parl.gc.ca ; sparrh@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
spivam@sen.parl.gc.ca ; stgerg@sen.parl.gc.ca ; sibben@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
stollp@sen.parl.gc.ca ; stratt@sen.parl.gc.ca ; taylon@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
tkachd@sen.parl.gc.ca ; tunnej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; wattc@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
wiebej@sen.parl.gc.ca ; wilsol@sen.parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 9:21 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: robanders@telus.net
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:44 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Harper.S@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:41 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Goldring.P@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:39 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:36 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: agarden@nb.sympatico.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 10:58 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: leblad@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 8:03 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: scotta@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 8:01 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: castoj@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:59 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: hubbac@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:58 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: bradsc@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:56 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: savoya@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:55 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: info@paulzed.com
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:34 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: megan@lutz.nb.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 4:05 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Brison.S@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:56 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Bachand.A@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:53 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: jim.prentice@shaw.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:41 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: rosent@math.toronto.edu
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 1:30 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: davidorchard@sasktel.net
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 1:15 PM
Subject: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
Just so ya know David I am forwarding these emails to other politicians as
well. But I didn't bother to call them because they are lawyers as well.
Therefore I see no need to explain my actions to them. Plus the smart one's
have a bad habit of trying to ignore me anyway. I t appears that standard
operating procedure for them is to ignore. delay, deny and then try to
settle. They are confused by someone that wants to argue law rather than go
away with the gold. What should be interesting to both of us is whether or
not they have a sudden fit of ethical behavior after they discover that an
honest western farmer and wild but ethical maritime biker have been talking
about them. Please notice that I am more than willing to help such a man as
Byron Prior anyway I can. I just wish there were more men like him on this
planet. Trust me the US Attorney backtracking in the Martha Stewart matter
and prosecuting a Secret Service Agent is too funny to relate in this email.
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: <robmoore@atrueconservative.ca>
To: <davidamos@comcast.net>
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> David,
>
> Thanks for the e-mails. I will read them all and hear what you have to
> say.
>
> All the best.
>
> Rob
>
>
>
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> > Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 5:08 PM
> > Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> > Elsie, I like you more and more. If anyone understands about
> > being forced to be away from his family its me. Give my mom a
> > call. Her laugh alone will make your day. To hell with the
> > smiling bastards in Ottawa their grins ain't genuine. Maritimers
> > can still find some fun in a long hard day :) Come to think of
> > it, maybe thats why the Upper Canadians think we are crazy. By
> > the way I have managed to get a rather famous lawyer to speak on
> > my wife's behalf down here while I run for Parliament uphome. But
> > before I go I have been invited to go fishing with Martha
> > Stewart's brother Frank in the Gulf of Mexico. My matters are
> > about to bust wide open down here. That is why I have chosen this
> > time to make appearance uphome. Once I make the news down here I
> > will step on the stump uphome.
> > Best
> > Regards
> > Dave
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> > To: David Amos
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 3:42 PM
> > Subject: RE: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> > Dear Dave,
> >
> > I try to respond to as many people as I can. We do get a lot of email
> > around here.... I decided to retire because I truly miss my family.
> > It's hard being on the road back and forth by yourself. It gets very
> > lonely.
> >
> > God Bless,
> > Elsie
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Amos [mailto:davidamos@comcast.net]
> > Sent: March 22, 2004 3:28 PM
> > To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> > Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> > No problem, Elsie. By the way my mom is a fan of yours. She told
> > me you were quitting. Too bad if it is true.You are the first
> > politician to respond to me. That fact alone wins my respect. Ask
> > around Saint John about me in certain circles I am fairly well
> > known. You may even know my sister, Nancy and her husband, Reid
> > Chedore. Perhaps you crossed paths with my dad C. Max Amos he was
> > a tax Supervisor for the Province years ago. And maybe even my
> > mom's second husband, Lloyd Nickerson, from Fredericton. He was
> > somewhat of a political person whereas my dad was not. (Lloyd was
> > chief electoral officer for about twelve years and did run as a
> > Conservative) If you wish to warm my mom's heart please give her
> > a call and simply say that you appreciate her good words about
> > you to her wild child Dalevid. She will get the joke. She is
> > always confusing me with another brother. Her name is Anna and
> > her number is 506 455 3600. Do with it what you will. Trust me I
> > would love to see another out spoken Maritimer step up to the
> > plate and speak of rights and wrongs. The sooner that I can go
> > back to being just Papa the happier my little Clan will be. I
> > would truly appreciate if someone would let my mom know that they
> > are at least aware of my concerns whether they agree with me or
> > not.
> >
> > Best
> > Regards
> >
> > Dave
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> > To: David Amos
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:15 PM
> > Subject: RE: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> > Thank you for the notice.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Amos [mailto:davidamos@comcast.net]
> > Sent: March 16, 2004 2:07 PM
> > To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> > Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: ethics@harvard.edu
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:06 PM
> > Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: tedcardwell@mail.gov.nf.ca
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:05 PM
> > Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: alltrue@roadrunner.nf.net
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:03 PM
> > Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: David Amos
> > To: Correspondance Deputy Prime Minister/Vice premier ministre
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:57 PM
> > Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> > I already received Anne's response. Can't you people read what
> > you wrote to me? Why else would I be so pissed off?
> > I am who I say I am and that is as follows:
> > David R. Amos
> > 153 Alvin Ave,
> > Milton, MA. 02186
> > Phone 617 240-6698
> >
> > Now just exactly who are you Mr. Correspondence Deputy Prime
> > Minister and are you a lawyer?
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Correspondance Deputy Prime Minister/Vice premier
> > ministre" <dpm@pm.gc.ca> To: <davidamos@comcast.net>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:34 PM
> > Subject: Regarding your e-mail
> >
> >
> > > If you wish to receive a response to your comments addressed
> > to the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety and
> > Emergency Preparedness, please include your return mailing
> > address along with your original e-mail message. All official
> > responses will be sent by regular mail.
> > >
> > > If you wish to send correspondence addressed to the Minister
> > through the regular mail, please use the following mailing
> > address:
> > >
> > > The Honourable A. Anne McLellan
> > > Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety
> > > and Emergency Preparedness
> > > 340 Laurier Avenue West
> > > Ottawa, Ontario
> > > K1A 0P8
> > >
> > > From: David Amos <mailto:davidamos@comcast.net>
> > > To: dwatch@web.net
> > > Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 11:32 PM
> > > Subject: Read real slow then forget what is politically
> > correct.
> > >
> > > Deal with your own conscience. After that try to think of
> > a good
> > > reason why I should not run for Parliament and at least speak
> > my mind about the sad state of our affairs. You know who I am.
> > If you don't, trust me, you are way behind the eight ball.
> > > Once I make my mark in the American Justice System and
> > political
> > > process, I am coming home to stress test the ethics of many a
> > lawyer/politician in my nativeland during the course of the
> > next federal election. My question to all of you will be why
> > did you wait for me to say something? Am I the only one paying
> > any attention. Even Jesus got mad a time or two and tore up a
> > temple when he saw all the money changing hands in a place
> > that should not be concerned about such things. But forget
> > about the money for a minute. What did he have to say about
> > anyone that harmed a child? Rest assured I will remind you.
> > Although I ain't religious, I must say that Jesus had more of
> > sand than most men and he made some very good points about
> > what is right and what is wrong. Can any of you even hold a
> > candle to Byron? He has at least one friend that will back him
> > up all the way down the line. I don't mind dying it is what I
> > didn't do while I was living that will haunt me in in my
> > grave. What is the golden rule these days? Is it truly a fact
> > that he with the gold makes the rules. Do you think voters
> > agree with that fact? What say you?
> > > Canadian Corruption
> > >
> > > Sexual Abuse & Political & Legal Conspiracy.
> > >
> > > RCMP Incompetence & Cover up.
> > >
> > > Priors Of Grand Bank NFLD Canada
> > >
> > > How do I get a corrupt legal system to investigate, charge and
> > convict itself? After years of asking the Canadian Legal
> > System to do its job, it's long past time to inform the public
> > myself about this lack of action or justice.
> > > If T. Alex Hickman, Justice Minister, 1966 to 1979 also Health
> > Minister 1968 to 1969 and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
> > of Newfoundland 1979 to 2000, 34 YEARS OF COMPLETE LEGAL
> > SYSTEMS CONTROL,at 41 years of age, rapes and impregnates your
> > younger sister Susan, at 12 years old, and in grade 8, what
> > would you do?At 12 years old she was the youngest child
> > ever,in Grand Bank,to have a baby. I am willing to take any
> > tests and answer all questions regarding my entire life. All
> > he has to do is take one blood test. It's time for him to stop
> > manipulating our legal system and face the truth which I have
> > been telling the legal System,and anyone else who would
> > listen, all of my life.I didn't just awake one morning and
> > decide to accuse the most powerful and most corrupt legal
> > animal in this province. I have had, no childhood, no
> > education, no family, no hometown, no self- esteem or
> > self-respect and no past, present or future as a contributing
> > person.
> > >
> > > By the time I was 14 years old I was responsible for 9 younger
> > children, all of us abused and molested while our hometown
> > either joined in, bothered us about our situation, or looked
> > the other way and said we were all trouble. Our mother has
> > always been a hypochondriac and married prostitute in a town
> > of 2500 people. She can go blind instantly, become a cripple
> > instantly, go insane instantly and even convinced the doctors
> > at our Health Science Center 4 years ago she was dying of
> > cancer. They called her family and said she had a maximum of
> > two weeks to live, but out of every situation she can
> > instantly become well. This person is a disgrace to the human
> > race and also so are all those who support her. I am Byron
> > Prior, the oldest of her 12 children.
> > > (A) I was sexually abused by my mother from age 4 to 14.
> > >
> > > (B) Physically beaten by my mother until I bleed because I
> > tried to stop her friends and family from molesting my younger
> > sisters.
> > >
> > > (C) Sent next door with my mother's gay boyfriend almost daily
> > for money from age 5 to 14.
> > >
> > > (D) Brought to her drunk girlfriend's summer cabin to be
> > sexually abused for money.
> > >
> > > (E) Had to clean the blood from my 4 year old sister after she
> > was sexually molested by our grandfather and left on the
> > kitchen floor in a pool of blood.
> > >
> > > (F) Had to watch while my oldest sister had three miscarriages
> > and two children by the age of 15. One child for a member of
> > the Newfoundland Government when she was 12, and a second
> > child when she was 15 for another Politician, a girl, Majorie
> > and a boy, Arron. In 1983 the girl, age 15, was given an
> > illegal abortion in Montreal with everything arranged and paid
> > for with spending money for her and my sister Joan, by a
> > friend of the family. This girl has worked for Hickman's
> > family business from high school to this day. Five of my
> > sisters and one brother suffered similar abuse as I did.
> > > Why is this situation allowed to continue for more than 40
> > years and ruin all my families lives? Is it because,
> > > (A) Our mothers past customers are politically connected and
> > run our legal system.
> > >
> > > (B) Our mothers past customers are Grand Bank business men
> > whose children are now politicians.
> > >
> > > (C) One of our mothers family is a big wheel with organized
> > crime all of his adult life and is a partner to politicians.
> > >
> > > (D) Is it because two of her past customers are Salvation Army
> > officers, who came by to help us but became customers as well.
> > (E) Is it because all of North America is corrupt and a family
> > of 12 really means nothing to anyone when business and
> > politics are concerned in an economy controlled by corruption.
> > (F) Is it to cover up Child rape and corruption by T. Alex
> > Hickman and a business family with influence and business
> > contacts all across Canada. The legal system now tells us
> > justice for my family and I are three charges against one
> > mentally delayed man with a judge and jury at the T. Alex
> > Hickman building in the same town where we spent our entire
> > lives with abuse and persecution. Two R.C.M.P. officers and
> > the Crown prosecutors office will make no effort to have the
> > location changed. Again there will be NO JUSTICE SERVED and as
> > much covered up as possible. This I'm told will begin in Sept.
> > 2001, at Grand Bank, NFLD I spoke with the Crown Prosecutor on
> > Sept,18/01. He said his office has been trying to get the
> > complete investigation reports from the RCMP for more than two
> > years now and to this date still hasn't received them. He said
> > this was in his experience, the first time he had ever seen
> > such an unexplained delay to get information. On Nov 29/01 I'm
> > told by Victim services, this has changed to Jan.11/02 for a
> > trial date to be set.
> > >
> > > To whom it may concern: 04/13/98 There are many horrors that I
> > can recall from childhood. Byron's too frequent trips to the
> > woodshed next door; his having to sleep in the same bed as our
> > Mother; his little hands, palms down, being held on the hot
> > coal stove burner; the never ending beatings with belt
> > buckles; braided nylon ropes; old- fashioned ironing cords;
> > hot tea thrown in our faces or the face of my Father; knives
> > and forks thrown at us; hot grease thrown at us or our Father;
> > continual molestation - sexual - to myself and other siblings;
> > continual verbal and emotional abuse; at eight years old I was
> > locked in the cupboard under the stairs for hours with rats
> > crawling around me because my little brother had misplaced his
> > baby bottle while I was in charge of him; continual
> > abandonment when Mother would take her vacation and leave us
> > at seven and eight years old to take care of ourselves and the
> > babies; being forced to quit school to go to work to provide
> > yet more money for our beloved Mother; my younger brother,
> > Allan, being thrown into jail for no legitimate reason, other
> > than she wanted him out of the house - by the way; if you
> > check, you will also find that there is no record of his
> > incarceration; the abuse that we suffered was, and remains,
> > never ending........ Our lives have been destroyed. We all
> > suffer from severe emotional problems. We have extreme
> > difficulty trusting others. We cannot form loving
> > relationships. It is very difficult for us to allow others to
> > get that close to us without pushing them away. All we ever
> > wanted was someone to love us for who we were; but, when we
> > get close to others, we tend to sabotage those relationships -
> > unconsciously. The cycle of abuse continued with my own
> > daughter. My younger brother, Randell, molested her from the
> > age of four years. This fact my daughter was afraid to confide
> > to me until a year and a half ago. May God have mercy on his
> > soul because "I Don't"!!!! Both Byron and myself have tried to
> > have those in authority - RCMP, Social Services, Clergy and
> > Teachers help us, but, our cries for help fell on deaf ears.
> > We were, to them, a disposible family of liars and children
> > with overactive imaginations. Nothing can make the nightmares
> > go away. Even the sleeping pills don't work anymore. It has to
> > end! There has to be justice and a sense of closure for all of
> > us. Please, if we stop this cycle of insanity from happening
> > to other innocent children, then maybe our lives would have
> > not totally been in vain. You are our hope. Please help us to
> > find justice.
> > > Sincerely Yours,
> > > Sharl (Donna) Prior
> > >
> > > April 14, 1998
> > > A letter of Shame;
> > > This letter concerns what happened to my family and myself.
> > The things that I remember are also the things I try to
> > forget. I'm not very good with words so I will only tell you a
> > few things of many which have happened within my family.
> > Leather belts, ironing cords, ropes were only some things I
> > was beaten with so many times I can't count. Verbal and mental
> > abuse, the same humilating things that were done to my sisters
> > and brothers. Girls having to pull down their pants and pea in
> > their underwear for our mothers long time friend, for money. I
> > remember our mother going into a bedroom with him and coming
> > out some time later. We have a brother and sister (who I love)
> > who look and act like this guy. I expect, without much doubt,
> > are his. I remember the abuse to my father, a man I loved with
> > all my heart. Attacks on him with anything our mother could
> > put her hands on, knives, hot water, chasing him out of the
> > house. This man was home maybe a day every ten, and she would
> > blame him for everything and when Dad wasn't around, we were
> > blamed for everything, which was anything. This is a woman who
> > every chance she had would call the police on me to try to
> > have me charged with something. This was when she couldn't
> > beat me anymore because I was a little older, but she still
> > had to have control over me. This was a small town in
> > Newfoundland with a population of 3500 people. So she would
> > have me taken away from my home by the police and I would have
> > nowhere else to go, this was control over me and she knew it.
> > I would have to kiss ass just to have a roof over my head. (Of
> > course this was after my father had passed away. He was afraid
> > of her but he would never have let her do this to me.) This is
> > a woman that had me put in jail during Christmas and New
> > Year's when I was very young. This was for trying to teach my
> > niece her homework, she said I had to ask her. Education was
> > not something she was concerned about for her kids. All she
> > wanted was when I had turned 15 was to get out of school and
> > go to work in the fish plant so I could pay my way every week.
> > She would loan me $20 and I would have to repay her $40 plus
> > rent. This woman has a lot of problems. I do not hate her
> > because she is my mother but I do not like her as a person.
> > > I finally got out and moved to Ontario, uneducated with no
> > direction, but out. I really haven't had any contact with her
> > since then and have not seen her since. I think because of all
> > these things and many more which as happened to me and things
> > I saw that had happened to other members of my family is the
> > reason I have a hard time to meet anyone, develop a
> > relationship, or hold down a job. I'm always lost, I don't
> > know if I should see a doctor or if it's just me, I'm lost.
> > The way I am now is the way the rest also is, it must be
> > because of her, take a look, it has to be. I'm writing this
> > letter now so that this woman and the others who knew what was
> > happening but did nothing face up and admit what happened. All
> > of my family have the same problems and the same memories
> > which affect our lives. This is something I have never spoken
> > about with anyone, but now maybe it's time. Hopefully, this
> > will help me start to became a real person a whole person.
> > Please do what you know is the right thing to do.
> > > Sincerely yours,
> > > Allan Prior
> > >
> > > To Whom It May Concern:
> > > July 24, 2001
> > > My name is Byron Prior. I'm the oldest living of these 12
> > children. I not only had to live through my abuse but, watch
> > as the rest of my sisters and brothers were abused and raped.
> > Three of my sisters raped, 1 by a grandfather at the age of 4,
> > a second raped by T. Alex Hickman, Justice Minister, at age
> > 11. A third sister raped by a young man in our home town. The
> > legal system are only concerned with keeping all this under
> > cover and protect themselves. Please people, if you have a
> > heart, walk one day in my shoes and tell me you would just
> > forget because these bureaucrats say so. I have copies of my
> > full statement on all the details of what happened, which I
> > gave the R.C.M.P. on March 9, 1998, 52.5 hours at their
> > office. I will send it to anyone who will send me an E-mail
> > address. I will never forget the abuse, shame, and persecution
> > to this day, from the animals who did this to my family.
> > > Sincerely,
> > > Byron Prior
> > >
> > > On April 3, 2000, the second in command of the R.C.M.P. for
> > all of Canada, said in an interview from Toronto, organized
> > crime totally controls Canadian businesses and affects every
> > Canadians daily life, from video arcades to laundry mats. This
> > is very sad, here in Canada we are lost and we all need help.
> > Here in Newfoundland our Dictator, T. Alex Hickman, has had
> > his hands in our Political and legal systems from 1957 to this
> > very day. His family and friends control everything, including
> > whether my family and I ever get justice for what was done to
> > us in the town of Grand Bank. We've tried for justice at least
> > 9 times from Police, Social Services, Clergy and Family
> > members. This last attempt started on March 9/98. On July
> > 24/98 an RCMP officer told me they have enough information to
> > charge our mother and one boyfriend now.
> > >
> > >
> > > On February 25/00 an RCMP officer said he was recommending the
> > justice department should lay 35 charges against several
> > people. This officer was taken off the case, transferred from
> > Grand Bank to St. John's custom's department position and his
> > wife transferred to a new position in St. John's with
> > Provincial social services department. To this day August
> > 20/01 only 3 charges are laid against one mentally delayed
> > boyfriend and no trial date set yet . The trial date has been
> > set for April 29/02. On April 5/02 I spoke with the Crown
> > Attorney, Ted Cardwell, he said the only two witnesses for the
> > trial on our behalf will be my sister Joan and me. The
> > investigating officer John Warr of the RCMP is not necessary,
> > my therapist of two years is not necessary, my social worker
> > from victim services is not necessary and my sister Joan's
> > therapist is not necessary. It seems to me like the final
> > verdict has already been decided and again for the victims
> > there is no justice.
> > >
> > >
> > > The Court did not proceed on April 29/02. It was found by the
> > Judge and both attorneys that they did not have an unbiased
> > jury toward the defendant and another attempt to find a jury
> > in this same town will be made again on May 21/02. This is
> > also the home town of my family and I and I asked the Crown
> > Attorney, at the beginning of this trial, if it could be held
> > in a neutral town to be fair to my family and I. If you have
> > read some of the statements in this web site guest book you
> > can understand why I made this request. It seems all
> > consideration is given for the defendant but none for the
> > victims. The R.C.M.P. freely admit that they are in position
> > of 3 statements I had given them about the abuse in our family
> > when I was a child but for some reason will not make these
> > statements available to me or my lawyer. I would like you to
> > read this request made of the R.C.M.P. by a local law firm on
> > >
> > > May 16/01 via fax (279-1871):
> > > Royal Canadian Mounted Police
> > > Marystown Detachment
> > > Marystown, Nfld.
> > > Attention: Constable Jackie Remillard
> > > Dear Constable Remillard:: Re: Our Client - Mr Byron Prior
> > Further to the above and to our various past communications,
> > most particularly our letter of February 16/ 01, despite the
> > passage of several months we have yet to receive the
> > information requested at that time. As it is ordinarily a
> > straightforward matter to obtain, with that person's consent,
> > the statements of a complainant we are at a loss to explain to
> > our client why our request has not been answered to date. We
> > would, therefore, appreciate your early attention to this
> > matter and look forward to the immediate receipt of the
> > requested material. Trusting the above to be satisfactory.
> > > Yours very truly
> > > BUDDEN, MORRIS
> > > GEOFFREY E. BUDDEN
> > >
> > >
> > > Questions for John Warr, R.C.M.P. lead investigator who will
> > no longer speak with me personally.
> > > 1. Why would you say most of the R.C.M.P. Officers and Doctors
> > in my case are retired and you couldn't find them now. Don't
> > any of them get a pension? What address is that sent to?
> > > 2. Why did you tell two witnesses who volunteered information
> > - a lady from Garnish and a man from Fortune, that this case
> > would be very messy and they should think very hard before
> > volunteering information, you would contact them in a couple
> > of days for an appointment. They both changed their minds
> > about witnessing.
> > > 3. Why didn't you question witnesses whose names you were
> > given at the beginning of this case four years ago. People in
> > Ontario and people 15 minutes from your office. One witness
> > #85 & 86 in my guest book on my website and others who have
> > telephoned me.
> > > 4. Why did you go to a Grand Bank business man, who had no
> > information about this case, more than 2 years ago and tell
> > him there was a very messy case coming up soon involving my
> > family and I. Then immediately after you were transferred and
> > only 3 charges laid against one person. 5. Why is the lead
> > investigator not a necessary witness in this case? You
> > investigated and recommended the charges be laid, you must
> > have some information regarding this case.
> > > 6. Why in 2 years of your investigation, did you not once
> > approach or ask Harriett Prior one question at all?
> > > After all these years of reporting to the R.C.M.P. can
> > everyone see why I have to inform the public myself. IT'S A
> > DISGRACE.
> > >
> > > On April 19/00 our Prime Minister is in the Middle East
> > fighting for Basic Human rights. Here in your own house Mr.
> > Prime Minister we need Basic Human Rights also. We are now
> > fighting in Afganistan for the rights of abused and persecuted
> > people, most of whom are women, please allow my family and I
> > some personal rights and dignity here in Canada. If anyone
> > requires more info I have statements to Police, names and
> > positions of all persons involved and letters from family
> > members on what has happened to our dysfunctional family.
> > Please contact us at <mailto:byronprior13@aol.com>
> > byronprior13@aol.com or call (709) 834-9822 Byron Prior. After
> > you view our site please tell your friends and e-mail
> > <mailto:pm@pm.gc.ca> pm@pm.gc.ca, or,
> > > <mailto:paul@paulmartin.ca> paul@paulmartin.ca and tell him,
> > Justice for The Prior family of Grand Bank NFLD. is long past
> > due, you need to give them Justice today. Visit their website
> > at
> > > <http://maxpages.com/sexualabuse>
> > http://maxpages.com/sexualabuse I Look forward to living with
> > Democracy, Freedom and Justice for my family also, here in
> > Canada.
> > > For additional informational pages go to the links at the top
> > left of our homepage. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,
> > >
No comments:
Post a Comment