---------- Original message ----------
From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 01:15:46 +0000
Subject: Re: RE Re: Yo Sr. Haukur S. Magnússon Why not ask Mr Baconfat yourself? Nope Mr Baconfat is truly as ugly as sin even by your Nordic standards However his butt buddy Patty Baby Doran may be your cup of tea.
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received
Kveðja / Best regards
Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
---------- Original message ----------
From: Póstur IRR <postur@irr.is>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 01:15:48 +0000
Subject: Re: RE Re: Yo Sr. Haukur S. Magnússon Why not ask Mr Baconfat yourself? Nope Mr Baconfat is truly as ugly as sin even by your Nordic standards However his butt buddy Patty Baby Doran may be your cup of tea.
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received.
Kveðja / Best regards
Innanríkisráðuneytið / Ministry of the Interior
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 21:12:21 -0400
Subject: RE Re: Yo Sr. Haukur S. Magnússon Why not ask Mr Baconfat yourself? Nope Mr Baconfat is truly as ugly as sin even by your Nordic standards However his butt buddy Patty Baby Doran may be your cup of tea.
To: hauxotron@gmail.com, birgittaj <birgittaj@althingi.is>, postur <postur@for.is>, editor <editor@grapevine.is>, sunrayzulu <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, "Paul.Lynch" <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>, patrick_doran1 <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, cps <cps@calgarypolice.ca>, DND_MND <DND_MND@forces.gc.ca>, IHolst@calgarypolice.ca, "rod.knecht" <rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau" <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gary.Rhodes" <Gary.Rhodes@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Randy.McGinnis" <Randy.McGinnis@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, postur <postur@for.stjr.is>, postur <postur@dkm.stjr.is>, postur <postur@ivr.stjr.is>, postur <postur@fjr.stjr.is>, postur <postur@irr.is>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, Glen Canning <grcanning@gmail.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>
Judge them for yourself.
First this is what Barry Winters aka Mr Baconfat looks like. BTW
Notice your email to us within the text of the blog?
http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/08/fwd-looks-like-perverted-comrade-of.html
This is Mr Baconfat talking to his little butt buddy Patty Baby Doran
in Youtube so you and your fellow queers can at least see what one
looks like and what they both sound like. Mr Baconfat sound like an
old woman to me. What say you?
The Mad Shangi Show "The Roast of David Raymond Amos: Cyberstalker"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wu8z4ouinY0
Need I say that I am hounoured that both these perverts hate mean old me?
However before you approach either one of these perverts for a date
please beware these queers love rough sex.
http://sunrayzulu.blogspot.ca/2016/04/call-cops-david-call-cst-lynch-offer-tp.html
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Sr. Haukur S. Magnússon" <hauxotron@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 00:30:26 +0000
Subject: Re: Yo Sr. Haukur S. Magnússon Why not asl Mr Baconfat yourself?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Don't rly know the guy, aside from your missives. He handsome?
http://sunrayzulu.blogspot.ca/2016/04/call-cops-david-call-cst-lynch-offer-tp.html
Monday, 18 April 2016
Call the Cops David! Call Cst Lynch! Offer tp Suck His Cock
Hey David, here's some more "hate speech" for you David!
https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2015/05/17/i-fuck-david-amos-in-the-ass/
I Fuck David Amos In The Ass
by themadshangi <https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/author/themadshangi/>
On May 17, 2015
You know, David Amos is always claiming that I’m Barry’s “butt-buddy.” No,
David, you got it all wrong. The truth is, Davey Baby, that you’re MY
butt-buddy… Because if I ever see you in my neighbourhood I’m going to fuck
you right in the ass. Since, you’re so preoccupied with anal sex, I might
as well make you right my big cock, fuck boy. Your prostate is going to get
a good hard dicking from Patty Baby. Go ahead, go e-mail the cops and
tell them I said that. I know you did with my last blog post, you whiny
motherfucker. Has anyone taken you seriously yet? Has Chief What’s-His-Name
of the Calgary RCMP ever got back to you and your endless series of
e-mails. Or have they all put you on the junk list, just like everyone else
you tirelessly e-mail? That’s right, Sonny Jim. You’re my little Ass Boy.
If you see me coming, just get on all fours with your ass in the air.
You’re going to be riding my dick. Then, I’m going to pull out and smear
shit all over your face. Give you the ol’ dirty moustache. You would look
just like Pancho Villa with that shit-brown Dirty Sanchez on your face,
mister. You don’t fuck with Patty Baby Doran, aka The Mad Shangi — the
baddest motherfucker on YouTube. MUTHAFUCKA!
I hope you like it rough, Davey-Baby. I don’t use Vaseline. That’s pussy
shit. I go straight dry fucking – that’s the way I like it. Your bleeding
asshole is all the lube I need, Fuck Boy. Is your dick getting hard
thinking about it, Davey Baby? I can’t wait to read about the next hundred
thousand e-mails you’re going to send about this blog. Go tell Stephen
Harper that I’m going to fuck you in the ass now. Like he gives a fuck, HA!
HA! Go tell the RCMP that you’re my new Ass Boy. What do you think of that
shit, Ass Boy? You think people really give a fuck what we write about you?
We can just as easily point them to the numerous threats you’ve made over
the years. Threats of harassment and physical violence. So pull down your
pants, Ass Boy. Your colon is going to be a-swollen after I fuck that ass.
Me love you long time, G.I
https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2015/05/15/this-is-how-i-would-kick-david-amoss-ass/
This Is How I Would Kick David Amos’s Ass
by themadshangi <https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/author/themadshangi/>
On May 15, 2015
Since I know that my last blog post sent David Amos into a hilarious fit of
rage (evidenced by the recent activity in my Hotmail junk folder), I can’t
help but write another one that I just know will piss him off even more. As
we all know, David Amos is a complete cunt who appears to spend his
endless free time spreading his nasty-ass cunty self across the
world-wide-web via e-mail. I can only imagine what this guy’s childhood was
like, because as a grown man he sure is a pathetic loser. I don’t know how
many decades it’s going to take before this guy even gets a clue that the
government sure isn’t paying attention to him and his endless barrage of
empty threats and delusional rhetoric. What a fucked up human being this
guy is. A nobody, who thinks he’s a somebody, just because he figured out
how to put the Prime Minister’s e-mail address into his address book. Wow,
buddy. You sure are a marvel of human evolution. Let me know when you get a
reply other than a disgruntled “fuck you” from somebody wondering why the
fuck a complete stranger is e-mailing him babbling nonsense.
Since you like to put the frighteners on people with toothless threats of
both legal action and physical violence, you little asshole
cyber-terrorist, I’m going to describe what would happen to you or your
goons if any of you were ever to fuck with me.
First, I would grab you by the throat. In half a second you would be on
your back gasping for air. Then, with my free hand, I would be hammering
your face into a bloody pulp, while simultaneously throwing knee shots
into your ribs and groin. Trust me, you wouldn’t be the first asshole I’ve
done this too. Then, if you really piss me off while your thrashing around
in my death grip, I would grab you by your fucking head and slam your skull
into the curb. The look on your face alone would be worth going to jail
for. I just don’t give a fuck, mister. I heard that you’re taking your
harassment of others outside the internet, so it’s only fair warning that
you do not want to fuck with me. Others may get by tolerating your abuse,
but I would straight up fucking kill you.
I don’t call myself The Mad
Shangi, because I’m a happy person – I’m a crazy motherfucker. And you
don’t want me going off on you, motherfucker – ’cause I’m like TNT. I will
blow up on your ass, Davey Boy. I’ll do the job the RCMP should have done
and rid the world of vermin like you. One crazy, unhinged motherfucker at a
time. Bet on that, you loony ass fuck. Go tell Chief What’s-His-Name what
a bad man I am for hurting your bitch ass feelings after you read this
blog. I dare ya. Nobody takes your stupid ass seriously, so I might ass
well be un-PC about it and just straight up tell you that if you take
your stupid bullshit to the next level, I will shut you down. You will be
one toe-tag wearing motherfucker at the morgue if you ever fuck with me,
buddy. I don’t need to be Mike Tyson to beat your ass to death, you
scrawny old fuck. King Kong got nothing on me, bitch. I hope you piss
yourself reading this, you paranoid whackjob motherfucker.
– THE MAD SHANGI
Call the cops Amos, you mother fucker
Posted by Seren at 21:24 No comments:
On Wednesday, 11 May 2016, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 14:48:27 -0400
Subject: Yo Sr. Haukur S. Magnússon Why not asl Mr Baconfat yourself?
To: hauxotron@gmail.com, birgittaj <birgittaj@althingi.is>, postur
<postur@for.is>, editor <editor@grapevine.is>, sunrayzulu
<sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, "Paul.Lynch" <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>,
patrick_doran1 <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, cps
<cps@calgarypolice.ca>, DND_MND <DND_MND@forces.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Sr. Haukur S. Magnússon" <hauxotron@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 03:23:15 +0000
> Subject: Re: In case Iceland forgot they were part of the "Coalition
> of the Willing" in 2003 Trust that I don't miss a snobby Icelander who
> brags to me that he moved to the US and i just call him to prove it
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Missed u, mang. How u been? How's mr baconfat?
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:03 PM, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Haukur Magnússon <haukur@grapevine.is>
> > Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 15:18:08 -0700
> > Subject: Re: Perhaps the FAR from Honourable John McCallum, P.C., M.P
> > Canada's latest Minister of "Defence" (or is it Attack?) ASAP before
> > we buy fancy Yankee airplanes in which the software ain't worth a good
> > god damn don't work with ill gotten money Dion made selling war
> > machines to Arabs EH?
> > To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
> >
> > Hey!
> >
> > Guess what! You missed me! Yup, I am no longer with The Reykjavík
> > Grapevine, having moved on to greater and greener pastures (here's my
> > final, farewell editorial if you're interested in that kind of thing:
> > http://bit.ly/HSMfinal).
> > But, this doesn't mean The Reykjavík Grapevine is no longer with you. On
> > the contrary! Here is some information that might come in handy:
> >
> > -If you want to get in touch with me personally for some reason, you can
> > always drop me a line at hauxotron@gmail.com. I might consider getting
> > a more adult-like email address at some point, but for now, you gotta
> > go with the 'tron.
> >
> > -For matters regarding The Reykjavík Grapevine's editorial department
> > (like,
> > if you have an article to submit or an event to plug), email
> > editor@grapevine.is.
> >
> > -For other matters concerning The Reykjavík Grapevine, like getting paid
> > or whatnot, email publisher@grapevine.is.
> >
> > Lastly, I'm not quite done cleaning up my monstrous email inbox. I try to
> > be a man of my words, so if you are expecting word back from me on some
> > project or whatever that we've been going back and forth on, rest assured
> > that a response is forthcoming, and I will be seeing whatever that
> > thing might be through (no need to email the 'tron about that.
> >
> > Thanks for everything! And see you sooner or later, hopefully!
> >
> > Love,
> >
> > Haukur S. Magnússon
> > hauxotron@gmail.com
> > skype: haukursmagnusson
> > Tel. (+1) 267 344 5654 (US) // (+354) 695-8158 (Iceland)
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Minister <Minister@cic.gc.ca>
> > Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 18:18:10 -0400
> > Subject: RE: Perhaps the FAR from Honourable John McCallum, P.C., M.P
> > Canada's latest Minister of "Defence" (or is it Attack?) ASAP before
> > we buy fancy Yankee airplanes in which the software ain't worth a good
> > god damn don't work with ill gotten money Dion made se
> > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> >
> > La version française suit.
> > This is an automatic acknowledgement of your e-mail addressed to the
> > Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship.
> >
> > Please note that e-mail is not a secure channel of communication.
> > Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) is not liable for
> > the unauthorized disclosure of personal information or the misuse of
> > that information by a third party where we have taken reasonable means
> > to verify the identity of the party.
> >
> > If this is a request for case information, the responsibility placed
> > on us by the Privacy Act to protect all personal information precludes
> > us from responding to you with case specific information using e-mail,
> > unless we are able to verify that you are entitled/authorized to
> > receive the case specific information. Therefore, only general
> > information would be provided in response to your enquiry.
> >
> > You will receive a reply by e-mail within 10 - 30 working days.
> > However, we will not respond to e-mails concerning the following:
> >
> >
> > * Assessment of points/qualifications.
> > * Calculation of time for citizenship eligibility.
> >
> > * Travel documents/requirements for travel to other countries.
> > * Complaints about U.S. Immigration.
> > * General information about visiting, living, working or studying
> > in Canada (please consult www.cic.gc.ca<http://www.cic.gc.ca>).
> > * The use of an authorized representative
> > (www.cic.gc.ca/english/information/representative/rep-who.asp<
> > http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/information/representative/rep-who.asp>).
> >
> > For more information about IRCC, including online services, please
> > visit: www.cic.gc.ca<http://www.cic.gc.ca/>.
> >
> > -----------------------------------------
> >
> > Ceci est un accusé de réception automatique du courriel que vous avez
> > acheminé au ministre de l'Immigration, des Réfugiés et de la
> > Citoyenneté.
> >
> > Veuillez noter que le courrier électronique n'est pas une voie de
> > communication protégée. Immigration, Réfugiés et Citoyenneté Canada
> > (IRCC) n'est pas responsable de la divulgation non autorisée de
> > renseignements personnels à une tierce partie ou de la mauvaise
> > utilisation de ces renseignements par une tierce partie s'il a pris
> > des mesures raisonnables pour s'assurer de l'identité de cette partie.
> >
> > Si votre courriel concerne une demande de renseignements sur un cas en
> > particulier, nous devons souligner que la Loi canadienne sur la
> > protection des renseignements personnels interdit la transmission
> > d'information personnelle par voie électronique à moins que nous ne
> > soyons en mesure de vérifier que vous êtes autorisé(e) à recevoir
> > cette information. En tel cas, seulement des informations générales
> > pourront vous être fournies.
> >
> > Vous recevrez une réponse par courriel dans un délai de 10 à 30 jours
> > ouvrables. Veuillez noter que nous ne répondrons pas aux courriels
> > concernant les questions suivantes :
> >
> >
> > * Évaluation des points/compétences.
> > * Le calcul du temps de résidence pour les demandes de citoyenneté.
> > * Documents de voyages/exigences pour voyager dans d'autres pays.
> > * Plaintes concernant les Service d'immigration des États-Unis.
> > * Informations générales pour visiter, vivre, travailler ou étudier
> > au Canada (veuillez consulter : www.cic.gc.ca<http://www.cic.gc.ca>).
> > * L'utilisation d'un représentant autorisé :
> > www.cic.gc.ca/francais/information/representants/representant-qui.asp<
> >
> http://www.cic.gc.ca/francais/information/representants/representant-qui.asp
> > >
> >
> > Pour de plus amples informations, incluant les services en ligne,
> > veuillez consulter le site Web d'IRCC au:
> > www.cic.gc.ca<http://www.cic.gc.ca>.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 5/10/16, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> >
> http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a20790/software-glitches-persist-in-f-35-program/
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/liberals-accused-of-lying-about-saudi-arms-deal/article29627989/
> > >
> > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > From: Minister <Minister@cic.gc.ca>
> > > Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 18:08:54 -0400
> > > Subject: RE: Trust that the FAR from Honourable John McCallum, P.C.,
> > > M.P will NEVER do the right thing Hell he covered up my concerns about
> > > Banksters and Tax Men etc and was the Minister of Defence when Canada
> > > helped to plan the War on Iraq in 2002 DUHHH???
> > > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > La version française suit.
> > > This is an automatic acknowledgement of your e-mail addressed to the
> > > Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship.
> > >
> > > Please note that e-mail is not a secure channel of communication.
> > > Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) is not liable for
> > > the unauthorized disclosure of personal information or the misuse of
> > > that information by a third party where we have taken reasonable means
> > > to verify the identity of the party.
> > >
> > > If this is a request for case information, the responsibility placed
> > > on us by the Privacy Act to protect all personal information precludes
> > > us from responding to you with case specific information using e-mail,
> > > unless we are able to verify that you are entitled/authorized to
> > > receive the case specific information. Therefore, only general
> > > information would be provided in response to your enquiry.
> > >
> > > You will receive a reply by e-mail within 10 - 30 working days.
> > > However, we will not respond to e-mails concerning the following:
> > >
> > >
> > > * Assessment of points/qualifications.
> > > * Calculation of time for citizenship eligibility.
> > >
> > > * Travel documents/requirements for travel to other countries.
> > > * Complaints about U.S. Immigration.
> > > * General information about visiting, living, working or studying
> > > in Canada (please consult www.cic.gc.ca<http://www.cic.gc.ca>).
> > > * The use of an authorized representative
> > > (www.cic.gc.ca/english/information/representative/rep-who.asp<
> > http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/information/representative/rep-who.asp>).
> > >
> > > For more information about IRCC, including online services, please
> > > visit: www.cic.gc.ca<http://www.cic.gc.ca/>.
> > >
> > > -----------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Ceci est un accusé de réception automatique du courriel que vous avez
> > > acheminé au ministre de l'Immigration, des Réfugiés et de la
> > > Citoyenneté.
> > >
> > > Veuillez noter que le courrier électronique n'est pas une voie de
> > > communication protégée. Immigration, Réfugiés et Citoyenneté Canada
> > > (IRCC) n'est pas responsable de la divulgation non autorisée de
> > > renseignements personnels à une tierce partie ou de la mauvaise
> > > utilisation de ces renseignements par une tierce partie s'il a pris
> > > des mesures raisonnables pour s'assurer de l'identité de cette partie.
> > >
> > > Si votre courriel concerne une demande de renseignements sur un cas en
> > > particulier, nous devons souligner que la Loi canadienne sur la
> > > protection des renseignements personnels interdit la transmission
> > > d'information personnelle par voie électronique à moins que nous ne
> > > soyons en mesure de vérifier que vous êtes autorisé(e) à recevoir
> > > cette information. En tel cas, seulement des informations générales
> > > pourront vous être fournies.
> > >
> > > Vous recevrez une réponse par courriel dans un délai de 10 à 30 jours
> > > ouvrables. Veuillez noter que nous ne répondrons pas aux courriels
> > > concernant les questions suivantes :
> > >
> > >
> > > * Évaluation des points/compétences.
> > > * Le calcul du temps de résidence pour les demandes de citoyenneté.
> > > * Documents de voyages/exigences pour voyager dans d'autres pays.
> > > * Plaintes concernant les Service d'immigration des États-Unis.
> > > * Informations générales pour visiter, vivre, travailler ou étudier
> > > au Canada (veuillez consulter : www.cic.gc.ca<http://www.cic.gc.ca>).
> > > * L'utilisation d'un représentant autorisé :
> > > www.cic.gc.ca/francais/information/representants/representant-qui.asp<
> >
> http://www.cic.gc.ca/francais/information/representants/representant-qui.asp
> > >
> > >
> > > Pour de plus amples informations, incluant les services en ligne,
> > > veuillez consulter le site Web d'IRCC au:
> > > www.cic.gc.ca<http://www.cic.gc.ca>.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5/10/16, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Quite frankly I don't understand how McCallum sleeps at night. That
> > >> smiling bastard and former bankster must have no conscience whatsoever
> > >>
> > >> http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/department/minister/mccallum.asp
> > >>
> > >> "Before entering politics, Mr. McCallum was Senior Vice President and
> > >> Chief Economist of the Royal Bank of Canada."
> > >>
> > >> "He served as Secretary of State (International Financial
> > >> Institutions) from January to May 2002. From May 2002 to December
> > >> 2003, he served as Minister of National Defence and, in 2003, as
> > >> Minister of Veterans Affairs. In July 2004, he was appointed Minister
> > >> of National Revenue"
> > >>
> > >> FYI I see you sneaky bastards checking my works from 2008 Perhaps some
> > >> of your minions should review these emails as well EH General Jonathan
> > >> Vance?
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/06/wrong-again-mr-baconfat-i-was-using.html
> > >>
> > >> QSLS Politics
> > >> By Location Visit Detail
> > >> Visit 36,268
> > >> Domain Name gc.ca ? (Canada)
> > >> IP Address 131.137.245.# (Defence Research
> > Establishment-Ottawa)
> > >> ISP Defense Research Establishment
> > >> Location
> > >> Continent : North America
> > >> Country : Canada (Facts)
> > >> State/Region : Ontario
> > >> City : Ottawa
> > >> Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
> > >> Language English (Canada)
> > >> en-ca
> > >> Operating System Microsoft WinNT
> > >> Browser Mozilla 6.1
> > >> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko
> > >> Javascript version 1.5
> > >> Monitor
> > >> Resolution : 1344 x 840
> > >> Color Depth : 24 bits
> > >> Time of Visit May 9 2016 9:45:49 pm
> > >> Last Page View May 9 2016 9:45:49 pm
> > >> Visit Length 0 seconds
> > >> Page Views 1
> > >> Referring URL http://www.google.ca.
> > ..jCNE8O3sU8vbxNYRt9Yk
> > >> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics.
> > ...eblower-part-1b.html
> > >> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics.
> > ...eblower-part-1b.html
> > >> Out Click
> > >> Time Zone UTC-4:00
> > >> Visitor's Time May 9 2016 4:45:49 pm
> > >> Visit Number 36,268
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > >> From: Minister <Minister@cic.gc.ca>
> > >> Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 17:38:59 -0400
> > >> Subject: RE: A little Deja Vu from 2008 for the CBC, the FAKE LEFT,
> > >> the Quakers, the Yankee War Resisters and of course their nasty old
> > >> buddies Lee Zaslofsky and Stevey Boy Harper
> > >> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> > >>
> > >> La version française suit.
> > >> This is an automatic acknowledgement of your e-mail addressed to the
> > >> Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship.
> > >>
> > >> Please note that e-mail is not a secure channel of communication.
> > >> Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) is not liable for
> > >> the unauthorized disclosure of personal information or the misuse of
> > >> that information by a third party where we have taken reasonable means
> > >> to verify the identity of the party.
> > >>
> > >> If this is a request for case information, the responsibility placed
> > >> on us by the Privacy Act to protect all personal information precludes
> > >> us from responding to you with case specific information using e-mail,
> > >> unless we are able to verify that you are entitled/authorized to
> > >> receive the case specific information. Therefore, only general
> > >> information would be provided in response to your enquiry.
> > >>
> > >> You will receive a reply by e-mail within 10 - 30 working days.
> > >> However, we will not respond to e-mails concerning the following:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> * Assessment of points/qualifications.
> > >> * Calculation of time for citizenship eligibility.
> > >>
> > >> * Travel documents/requirements for travel to other countries.
> > >> * Complaints about U.S. Immigration.
> > >> * General information about visiting, living, working or studying
> > >> in Canada (please consult www.cic.gc.ca<http://www.cic.gc.ca>).
> > >> * The use of an authorized representative
> > >> (www.cic.gc.ca/english/information/representative/rep-who.asp<
> > http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/information/representative/rep-who.asp>).
> > >>
> > >> For more information about IRCC, including online services, please
> > >> visit: www.cic.gc.ca<http://www.cic.gc.ca/>.
> > >>
> > >> -----------------------------------------
> > >>
> > >> Ceci est un accusé de réception automatique du courriel que vous avez
> > >> acheminé au ministre de l'Immigration, des Réfugiés et de la
> > >> Citoyenneté.
> > >>
> > >> Veuillez noter que le courrier électronique n'est pas une voie de
> > >> communication protégée. Immigration, Réfugiés et Citoyenneté Canada
> > >> (IRCC) n'est pas responsable de la divulgation non autorisée de
> > >> renseignements personnels à une tierce partie ou de la mauvaise
> > >> utilisation de ces renseignements par une tierce partie s'il a pris
> > >> des mesures raisonnables pour s'assurer de l'identité de cette partie.
> > >>
> > >> Si votre courriel concerne une demande de renseignements sur un cas en
> > >> particulier, nous devons souligner que la Loi canadienne sur la
> > >> protection des renseignements personnels interdit la transmission
> > >> d'information personnelle par voie électronique à moins que nous ne
> > >> soyons en mesure de vérifier que vous êtes autorisé(e) à recevoir
> > >> cette information. En tel cas, seulement des informations générales
> > >> pourront vous être fournies.
> > >>
> > >> Vous recevrez une réponse par courriel dans un délai de 10 à 30 jours
> > >> ouvrables. Veuillez noter que nous ne répondrons pas aux courriels
> > >> concernant les questions suivantes :
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> * Évaluation des points/compétences.
> > >> * Le calcul du temps de résidence pour les demandes de citoyenneté.
> > >> * Documents de voyages/exigences pour voyager dans d'autres pays.
> > >> * Plaintes concernant les Service d'immigration des États-Unis.
> > >> * Informations générales pour visiter, vivre, travailler ou étudier
> > >> au Canada (veuillez consulter : www.cic.gc.ca<http://www.cic.gc.ca>).
> > >> * L'utilisation d'un représentant autorisé :
> > >> www.cic.gc.ca/francais/information/representants/representant-qui.asp
> <
> >
> http://www.cic.gc.ca/francais/information/representants/representant-qui.asp
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Pour de plus amples informations, incluant les services en ligne,
> > >> veuillez consulter le site Web d'IRCC au:
> > >> www.cic.gc.ca<http://www.cic.gc.ca>.
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/06/wrong-again-mr-baconfat-i-was-using.html
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > >> From: BARRY WINTERS <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>
> > >> Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 22:56:48 -0600 (MDT)
> > >> Subject: Re: RE Introduce Me To Your Lawyers, Lt Col John Errington of
> > >> the
> > >> PPCLI
> > >> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> > >>
> > >> You just proved my point! Davey Baby!
> > >>
> > >> On 6/5/13, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>> On 4/6/12, BARRY WINTERS <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Little Davey Baby
> > >>>
> > >>> I never wrote that, at least not sober or in this universe.
> > >>>
> > >>> ----- Original Message -----
> > >>> From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> > >>> To: "BARRY WINTERS" <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>; "greg.weston"
> > >>> <greg.weston@cbc.ca>; "Mackay.P" <Mackay.P@forces.gc.ca>;
> "Barry.Shaw"
> > >>> <Barry.Shaw@forces.gc.ca>; "mccalj" <mccalj@parl.gc.ca>;
> "McCallum.J"
> > >>> <McCallum.J@parl.gc.ca>; "Mackap" <Mackap@parl.gc.ca>
> > >>> Cc: "birgir" <birgir@althingi.is>; <birgittaj@althingi.is>;
> > >>> <jeff.kasbrick@gov.ab.ca>; "jacquie" <jacquie@suehuff.ca>;
> > >>> <sue@albertaparty.ca>; <raymartin@albertandp.ca>; "don.koziak"
> > >>> <don.koziak@wildrose.ca>; "robert" <robert@albertaparty.ca>; "glenn"
> > >>> <glenn@albertaparty.ca>; "enquiries" <enquiries@josipapetrunic.ca>;
> > >>> "thomas" <thomas@thomasmla.com>; "PREM Premier" <premier@gov.ab.ca>;
> > >>> "danielle" <danielle@wildrosealliance.ca>; <oldmaison@yahoo.com>;
> > >>> "occupyfredericton" <occupyfredericton@gmail.com>
> > >>> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 8:58 PM
> > >>> Subject: RE War, Iceland, Iraq, Canada and Wikileaks as it pertains
> to
> > >>> a zionist spin doctor operating within the current election in
> Alberta
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> YOU wrote it alright
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
> http://www.ftlcomm.com/ensign/editorials/LTE/thornton/thorntonlist/thornton_200/thornton215/LTEwinters.pdf
> > >>>
> > >>> However what you wrote above conflicts BIGTIME to what you wrote
> below
> > >>> years later.
> > >>>
> > >>> BTW its SOCOM not SOUCOM You need to spell your bullshit correctly in
> > >>> order to make your involvement more plausible EH MR PLAGARIST and
> > >>> wannbe soldier?
> > >>>
> > >>> See aleast the CBC arsehole Greggy Baby Weston spelled it right as
> his
> > >>> spun his bullshit about it.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2011/05/15/weston-iraq-invasion-wikileaks.html
> > >>>
> > >>> WESTON: Canada offered to aid Iraq invasion: WikiLeaks
> > >>> By Greg Weston, CBC News Posted: May 15, 2011 9:24 PM ET Last
> Updated:
> > >>> May 16, 2011 7:43 AM ET Read 754 comments754
> > >>>
> > >>> IN DEPTH: WikiLeaks — News and analysis
> > >>> DATABASE: Text of Canadian cables in WikiLeaks
> > >>> ARCHIVES: PM says Canada won't fight in Iraq The same day Canada
> > >>> publicly refused to join the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, a
> > >>> high-ranking Canadian official was secretly promising the Americans
> > >>> clandestine military support for the fiercely controversial
> operation.
> > >>>
> > >>> The revelation that Canadian forces may have secretly participated in
> > >>> the invasion of Iraq is contained in a classified U.S. diplomatic
> memo
> > >>> obtained exclusively by CBC News from the whistleblower website
> > >>> WikiLeaks.
> > >>>
> > >>> On March 17, 2003, two days before U.S. warplanes launched their
> > >>> attack on Baghdad, prime minister Jean Chrétien told the House of
> > >>> Commons that Canadian forces would not be joining what the
> > >>> administration of then U.S. president George W. Bush dubbed the
> > >>> "coalition of the willing."
> > >>>
> > >>> Chrétien's apparent refusal to back the Bush administration's
> > >>> invasion, purportedly launched to seize weapons of mass destruction
> > >>> possessed by Iraqi ruler Saddam Hussein (which were never found), was
> > >>> hugely popular in Canada, widely hailed as nothing less than a
> > >>> defining moment of national sovereignty.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Greg Weston
> > >>> But even as Chrétien told the Commons that Canada wouldn't
> participate
> > >>> in Operation Iraqi Freedom, Canadian diplomats were secretly telling
> > >>> their U.S. counterparts something entirely different.
> > >>>
> > >>> The classified U.S. document obtained from WikiLeaks shows senior
> > >>> Canadian officials met that same day with high-ranking American and
> > >>> British diplomats at Foreign Affairs headquarters in Ottawa.
> > >>>
> > >>> The confidential note, written by a U.S. diplomat at the gathering,
> > >>> states that Foreign Affairs official James Wright waited until after
> > >>> the official meeting to impart the most important news of all.
> > >>>
> > >>> According to the U.S. account, Wright "emphasized" that contrary to
> > >>> public statements by the prime minister, Canadian naval and air
> forces
> > >>> could be "discreetly" put to use during the pending U.S.-led assault
> > >>> on Iraq and its aftermath.
> > >>>
> > >>> At that time, Canada had warships, aircraft and over 1,200 naval
> > >>> personnel already in the Strait of Hormuz at the mouth of the Persian
> > >>> Gulf, intercepting potential militant vessels and providing safe
> > >>> escort to other ships as part of Operation Enduring Freedom, the
> > >>> post-Sept. 11, 2001, multinational war on terrorism.
> > >>>
> > >>> 'While for domestic political reasons… [Canada] has decided not to
> > >>> join in a U.S. coalition,… they are also prepared to be as helpful as
> > >>> possible in the military margins'
> > >>>
> > >>> —Secret U.S. diplomatic cableThe U.S. briefing note states:
> "Following
> > >>> the meeting, political director Jim Wright emphasized that, despite
> > >>> public statements that the Canadian assets in the Straits of Hormuz
> > >>> will remain in the region exclusively to support Enduring Freedom,
> > >>> they will also be available to provide escort services in the Straits
> > >>> and will otherwise be discreetly useful to the military effort.
> > >>>
> > >>> "The two ships in the Straits now are being augmented by two more en
> > >>> route, and there are patrol and supply aircraft in the U.A.E. [United
> > >>> Arab Emirates] which are also prepared to 'be useful.'
> > >>>
> > >>> "This message tracks with others we have heard," the U.S. diplomat
> > >>> wrote in his briefing note to State Department bosses in Washington.
> > >>>
> > >>> "While for domestic political reasons… the GOC [Government of Canada]
> > >>> has decided not to join in a U.S. coalition of the willing,… they are
> > >>> also prepared to be as helpful as possible in the military margins."
> > >>>
> > >>> 'Please destroy cable'
> > >>> The original U.S. briefing cable, dated the day of the meeting, was
> > >>> marked "unclassified." Two days later, the U.S. Embassy in Ottawa
> > >>> issued an urgent internal notice to "please destroy previous cable,"
> > >>> replacing it with the same message but marked "confidential."
> > >>>
> > >>> The Canadian official involved, James Wright, is now Canada's high
> > >>> commissioner in London. He declined to comment for this report.
> > >>>
> > >>> The U.S. ambassador to Canada at the time, Paul Cellucci, says he
> > >>> couldn't be at the meeting in Ottawa that day — he was stranded in a
> > >>> snowstorm in the U.S. — but the version of events in the leaked memo
> > >>> "sounds right."
> > >>>
> > >>> "The message from the Canadians was pretty clear," Cellucci told CBC
> > >>> News. "We are not putting boots on the ground in Iraq. We will say
> > >>> good things about the United States and not-so-good things about
> > >>> Saddam Hussein."
> > >>>
> > >>> And finally: "We will keep our ships in the Persian Gulf helping in
> > >>> the war on terror — and any way else we can help."
> > >>>
> > >>> Exactly what that meant for the Canadian naval ships and surveillance
> > >>> aircraft in the Gulf region at the time — and how much they
> ultimately
> > >>> became involved in the Iraq war — remains a matter of considerable
> > >>> debate.
> > >>>
> > >>> Before the invasion of Iraq, the duties of the Canadian ships had
> been
> > >>> mainly to protect other vessels from attacks by militants and to
> > >>> intercept craft suspected of gun-running and other potentially
> > >>> militant-related activities.
> > >>>
> > >>> The issue is what, if anything, changed after the Chrétien government
> > >>> decreed those ships and aircraft couldn't be involved in intercepting
> > >>> vessels connected to the Iraq war.
> > >>>
> > >>> Three months before the Iraq invasion, the then Canadian defence
> > >>> minister John McCallum, right, met with U.S. counterpart Donald
> > >>> Rumsfeld, left, whose diplomats had told him to keep his expectations
> > >>> 'modest' for what Canada might contribute to the war. (CBC)
> > >>> Eugene Lang, chief of staff to then defence minister John McCallum,
> > >>> says there was no end of internal debate over whether the Canadian
> > >>> Forces were being put into a mission impossible.
> > >>>
> > >>> "How do you know if something is connected to terrorism or Iraq? When
> > >>> you are intercepting unknown boats, you don't know what you have
> taken
> > >>> over until you have taken it over."
> > >>>
> > >>> Lang says that after "painful" consultations with federal lawyers,
> the
> > >>> Department of National Defence issued Canadian naval commanders in
> the
> > >>> Gulf clear orders not to engage in anything to do with Operation
> Iraqi
> > >>> Freedom.
> > >>>
> > >>> "But who knows whether in fact we were doing things indirectly for
> > >>> Iraqi Freedom? It is quite possible."
> > >>>
> > >>> McCallum's former chief recalled a bitter internal battle over
> whether
> > >>> to pull the Canadian ships out of the Gulf altogether to avoid any
> > >>> confusion.
> > >>>
> > >>> "For a long time, the [Canadian] military pushed really hard not to
> be
> > >>> in Afghanistan, and instead be part of a full-blown
> > >>> boots-on-the-ground Iraq invasion," Lang said.
> > >>>
> > >>> "So the military was dead set against pulling out [of the Gulf], and
> > >>> in the end the government decided we would stay mainly, I think, for
> > >>> Canada-U.S. relations."
> > >>>
> > >>> Former defence minister McCallum recalls he and his officials having
> > >>> "extremely long and detailed meetings to make sure that we were not
> in
> > >>> fact committing to help the war in Iraq."
> > >>>
> > >>> "Now, what happens on the high seas is not something I can prove or
> > >>> disprove, but those were the orders that the military had."
> > >>>
> > >>> U.S. didn't seem to care
> > >>> Ironically, after all the fuss, the Americans didn't seem to care
> > >>> whether Canada contributed a lot of military might to the Iraq
> > >>> mission.
> > >>>
> > >>> A former senior Canadian bureaucrat said: "The Americans knew we were
> > >>> stretched to the limit on the military side, and they really just
> > >>> wanted a political endorsement of their plan to go into Iraq."
> > >>>
> > >>> Former U.S. ambassador Cellucci concurred: "We were looking for moral
> > >>> support. That's all we were looking for.… We were looking for 'we
> > >>> support the Americans.' "
> > >>>
> > >>> Flight deck crew watch as a U.S. F/A-18 Hornet launches from an
> > >>> aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf one week into the 2003 invasion
> > >>> of Iraq. Canada had two warships nearby at the time, and secretly
> > >>> offered to make them 'useful' to the U.S., a leaked American document
> > >>> says. (Steve Helber/Associated Press)
> > >>> Then defence minister McCallum met with his counterpart, U.S. defence
> > >>> secretary Donald Rumsfeld, three months before the Iraq invasion.
> > >>> McCallum recalls Rumsfeld never even mentioned Canada's possible
> > >>> military contribution to Iraq.
> > >>>
> > >>> A U.S. diplomatic briefing note prepared for Rumsfeld prior to the
> > >>> meeting states: "As for what Canada might bring to the table, our
> > >>> expectations should be modest."
> > >>>
> > >>> The memo, also obtained by CBC News from WikiLeaks, goes on to say:
> > >>> "Canada probably would need to use assets currently devoted to
> > >>> Operation Enduring Freedom, including a naval task group [in the
> Gulf]
> > >>> and patrol and transport aircraft."
> > >>>
> > >>> If the secret U.S. memos cast doubts on Canada's status as a
> refusenik
> > >>> of the Iraq war, the public also didn't exactly get the whole truth
> > >>> about a group of Canadian soldiers the government admitted were in
> > >>> Iraq.
> > >>>
> > >>> From the outset, the Chrétien government said a "few" Canadian
> > >>> soldiers embedded with the U.S. and British militaries as exchange
> > >>> officers would be allowed to remain in their positions, even if they
> > >>> wound up in Iraq.
> > >>>
> > >>> While the revelation caused a ruckus in Parliament, it all sounded
> > >>> relatively innocuous at the time.
> > >>>
> > >>> But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
> > >>> brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
> > >>> says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
> > >>> to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
> > >>> including a Canadian general.
> > >>>
> > >>> That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
> > >>> who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
> > >>> U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk
> was
> > >>> also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that
> helped
> > >>> prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait.
> > >>>
> > >>> The Department of National Defence refused to comment on Natynczyk's
> > >>> role, if any, in the invasion of Iraq.
> > >>>
> > >>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> > >>>> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 23:05:48 -0300
> > >>>> Subject: Re Mean old me versus the incompetent Canadain Military
> > >>>> Police and Barry Winters a zionist who claims to be a former officer
> > >>>> To: media@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, commission@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, Barry
> Winters
> > >>>> <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, "Julian Assange)" <editor@wikileaks.org>,
> > >>>> Sheldon Day <gem3intucson@q.com>, whistleblower
> > >>>> <whistleblower@ctv.ca>, "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, brian
> > >>>> <brian@brian-macdonald.ca>, tracy <tracy@jatam.org>
> > >>>> Cc: mackay01 <mackay01@canada.com>, IgnatM <IgnatM@parl.gc.ca>,
> > LaytoJ
> > >>>> <LaytoJ@parl.gc.ca>, danf <danf@danf.com>, "john.logan"
> > >>>> <john.logan@gnb.ca>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ATTENTION
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Glenn Stannard Acting Chair
> > >>>> Military Police Complaints Commission
> > >>>> 270 Albert Street, 10th Floor
> > >>>> Ottawa, ON, K1P 5G8
> > >>>> Telephone: (613) 947-5625
> > >>>> Telephone Toll Free: 1 800 632-0566
> > >>>> Fax: (613) 947-5713
> > >>>> Fax Toll Free: 1 877 947-5713
> > >>>> e-mail: commission@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Do you people have a lawyer with the balls to talk to me or must I
> sue
> > >>>> the CROWN first?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Perhaps your snobby military lawyers should study every word of the
> > >>>> evil bastard's blog
> > >>>>
> > >>>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2010_04_01_archive.html
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Furthermore Iggy's legal people should know this should be some sort
> > >>>> of Fucking Secret BULLSHIT to protect the reputations of many a
> > >>>> corrupt politician EH Mr Mindless Minister of Defence Petey Baby
> > >>>> MacKay??
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> >
> http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2009/08/what-does-amerika-truther-movment-god.html
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > >>>> From: Haukur S Magnusson <haukur@grapevine.is>
> > >>>> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 02:50:58 +0000
> > >>>> Subject: Re: OK allow me to be brief then Tell Julian Assange and
> your
> > >>>> bullshitting pals in Iceland to go fuck themselves
> > >>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Dude, I really have no idea who you are or why you are so upset with
> > >>>> this Julian person.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Hope it all works out for you.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Haukur
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Apr 7, 2010, at 2:43 AM, David Amos wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> On 4/6/10, Haukur S Magnusson <haukur@grapevine.is> wrote:
> > >>>>>> Pardon me sir,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> why do you keep signing your crazy e-mails with a Reykjavík
> > Grapevine
> > >>>>>> footer? It is disturbing, and we would appreciate it if you
> stopped
> > >>>>>> doing it.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Also, if you want people to read what you have to say, make it
> less
> > >>>>>> long and all over the place.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Haukur S. Magnússon
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Editor // Reykjavík Grapevine
> > >>>>>> haukur@grapevine.is
> > >>>>>> Tel. (+354) 695-8158 / (+354) 540-3602
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Apr 7, 2010, at 2:24 AM, David Amos wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/user/AndyCobbonUTube#p/u/14/dk4rBQDxOEE
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2010_04_01_archive.html
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> This should be some sort of Fucking Secret BULLSHIT in order to
> > >>>>>>> protect the reputations of many a corrupt politician even a few
> > >>>>>>> Icelanders EH?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> >
> http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2009/08/what-does-amerika-truther-movment-god.html
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Friday, August 14, 2009
> > >>>>>>> What does Amerika, the "Truther" movment, "God" and retards have
> > >>>>>>> to do with Canada
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> We do not have to worry about comment from Little Dean and
> > >>>>>>> Dave...they are to uneducated to understand most posts
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> So have you seen them, been annoyed or insulted by them, have you
> > >>>>>>> smelled their disease? Have you ever crossed the "medicine line"
> > and
> > >>>>>>> seen some Yank being taken into custody because he just
> has..."this
> > >>>>>>> constitutional right to bear arms"...in Canada. I remember years
> > ago
> > >>>>>>> when the debate was on in Canada, about there being weapons of
> mass
> > >>>>>>> destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends" demanded that Canada
> > >>>>>>> join into "the Coalition of the Willing.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> American "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for
> > >>>>>>> NOT buying into the US policy. At the time I was serving as a
> > >>>>>>> planner
> > >>>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>> NDHQ and with 24 other of my colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM
> > >>>>>>> HQ to be involved in the planning in the planning stages of the
> > >>>>>>> op....and
> > >>>>>>> to report to NDHQ, that would report to the PMO upon the merits
> of
> > >>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>> proposed operation.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> There was never at anytime an existing target list of verified
> > sites
> > >>>>>>> where there were deployed WMD. Coalition assets were more than
> > >>>>>>> sufficient for the initial strike and invasion phase but even at
> > >>>>>>> that
> > >>>>>>> point in the planning, we were concerned about the number of
> > >>>>>>> "boots on the ground" for the occupation (and end game) stage of
> an
> > >>>>>>> operation in Iraq.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> We were also concerned about the American plans for occupation
> > plans
> > >>>>>>> of Iraq because they at that stage included no contingency for a
> > >>>>>>> handing over of civil authority to a vetted Iraqi government and
> > >>>>>>> bureaucracy. There was no detailed plan for Iraq being
> "liberated"
> > >>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>> returned to its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> This was contrary to the lessons of Vietnam but also to the
> > military
> > >>>>>>> thought, that folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and
> > >>>>>>> others
> > >>>>>>> illucidated upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission,
> > what
> > >>>>>>> conditions are to met before US troop can redeploy?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Prime Minister Jean Chretien and the PMO were even at the very
> > >>>>>>> preliminary planning stages wary of Canadian involment in an Iraq
> > >>>>>>> operation....History would prove them correct. The political
> > >>>>>>> preesure
> > >>>>>>> being applied on the PMO from the George W Bush administration
> was
> > >>>>>>> onerus
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and
> Canadian
> > >>>>>>> military assets even moreso It was proposed by the PMO that
> > Canadian
> > >>>>>>> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantene
> > >>>>>>> operations
> > >>>>>>> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in
> > >>>>>>> Afghanistan
> > >>>>>>> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
> > >>>>>>> operation....
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian lives and
> > >>>>>>> liberal political capitial.. and the priority of which ....not
> > >>>>>>> neccessarily in
> > >>>>>>> that order. Essentially Canada detemined to stay out of Iraq,
> paid
> > >>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>> price, of a larger role in Afghanistan to enable US military
> assets
> > >>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>> redeploy to Iraq.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> The US op in Afghanistan evolved from a US op, to a UN op, to a
> > NATO
> > >>>>>>> /
> > >>>>>>> ISAF op. NATO countries other than Canada and the UK shun combat
> > >>>>>>> operations in Afghanistan..their rules of deployment and
> engagement
> > >>>>>>> mitigate against NATO troops engaging the Taliban. By design I am
> > >>>>>>> quite
> > >>>>>>> sure.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> But now the American Iraq op, is a great success. The "surge"
> > >>>>>>> worked.
> > >>>>>>> But alas now 127 Canadian soldiers are dead. The 2011 deadline is
> > >>>>>>> coming nigh....and President Barak Obama and NATO want Canada to
> > >>>>>>> consider extending the deployment of Canadian troops. The motives
> > >>>>>>> are different. The US wants to... needs to, as matter of national
> > >>>>>>> security, to defeat insurgency in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Our
> > >>>>>>> European allies want Canada to remain and continue to "punch
> above
> > >>>>>>> its
> > >>>>>>> weight" so European soldiers do not have to actually fight or
> die.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> That begs a few questions: "Nations do not have friends, nations
> > >>>>>>> have
> > >>>>>>> interests" -Henry Kissinger. Is American national security re
> > >>>>>>> terrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan compatable with Canadian
> > >>>>>>> national interests? If this country, Canada is going to be a
> > >>>>>>> continuing ally in "the war against terror"....should not our
> > >>>>>>> "friends
> > >>>>>>> and neighbours across the medicine line be more amenable in
> > >>>>>>> matters of trade, or just living up to their free trade
> agreements.
> > >>>>>>> If
> > >>>>>>> our
> > >>>>>>> "friends and neighbours" to the south want Canadians to fight
> side
> > >>>>>>> by
> > >>>>>>> side...maybe that 7 % Softwood lumber tariff was a mistake...or
> the
> > >>>>>>> buy American provision in the currant stimulus plan ought to be
> re
> > >>>>>>> thought.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Our American "friends" give Israel roughly 3 billion dollars a
> year
> > >>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>> be spent buying weapons systems from US defense contactors...to
> > >>>>>>> survive (both Israel and US defense industries) Perhaps US
> dollars
> > >>>>>>> should flow to Canada to buy weapons systems and patrol aircraft
> > and
> > >>>>>>> naval platforms...after all, aren't we your "friends and allies"?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> There is nothing similar with American culture, and politics
> > between
> > >>>>>>> Canada and the US. Canada evolved into nation status and the US,
> > >>>>>>> revolted violently. This difference in the means we became
> > >>>>>>> nations...has greatly defined who and what we are.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Our American "friends" look upon Canada as cultural, economic and
> > >>>>>>> political satrap.... Now to their great consternation they are
> > >>>>>>> finding
> > >>>>>>> out... that is NOT the case . Nothing good came to Canada by way
> of
> > >>>>>>> America. The military "schewir punct" should be defense of our
> > >>>>>>> continental shelf and the arctic.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Canada does need to stop shipping unrefined bitumen to the US and
> > >>>>>>> totally refine it here and start building a pipeline for bitumen
> to
> > >>>>>>> Canada's west coast to sell to Asian and the Chinese market. It
> is
> > >>>>>>> more than past time to understand ..our American "friends" are
> > >>>>>>> not our friends at all.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Or else it is: Bend over here it comes again.....KY anyone?
> > >>>>>>> Posted by Seren at 11:27 AM
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > >>>>>>> From: Barry Winters <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>
> > >>>>>>> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 08:33:09 -0600
> > >>>>>>> Subject: Re: The Reykjavík Grapevine Al Jazeera Iceland WikiLeaks
> > >>>>>>> and British Banksters etc
> > >>>>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Tuesday, April 6, 2010
> > >>>>>>> David Amos is a RCMP rat
> > >>>>>>> Police Constables the world over call informants...cocksuckers.
> > >>>>>>> David Raymond Amos is a RCMP rat, a cocksucker, and he admits it.
> > >>>>>>> Just a few days ago David Raymond Amos admit he informed on and
> > >>>>>>> gave evidence in a murder case involving Gillies Moreau.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> David Amos has never sued or blown the whistle on anyone. There
> is
> > >>>>>>> no
> > >>>>>>> citation of any case involving David Raymond Amos in the New York
> > >>>>>>> Law Reporting Service, Shepards, or the Mass. Law reporting
> society
> > >>>>>>> or
> > >>>>>>> for that matter any state citation reporting service
> anywhere...you
> > >>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>> places lawyers go to precedents for their briefs.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Wikileaks will have NOTHING to do with David Amos. DavidAmos
> > >>>>>>> routinely plagerizes wikileaks material and then says he had
> > >>>>>>> everything
> > >>>>>>> to do with its exposure. David Raymond Amos is not an "ethical
> > >>>>>>> whistle
> > >>>>>>> blower" he has no record of having any information regarding
> public
> > >>>>>>> corruption whatsoever.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> But David Raymond Amos has a record of being a rat! A snitch for
> > the
> > >>>>>>> "feds" he claims to hate. His kids are rats and assets of the
> RCMP
> > >>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>> FBI because they are low low level snitches that inform on the
> > lower
> > >>>>>>> rungs of minor organized crime organizations.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> But David Raymond Amos is also a pedophile or a "skinner" and a
> > >>>>>>> "goof".....
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Time will eventually run out for David as it always does for rats
> > >>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>> skinners. So much for being an "ethical whistleblower" eh!
> > >>>>>>> Posted by Seren at 7:07 AM
> > >>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
> > >>>>>>> From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>> To: "whistleblower" <whistleblower@ctv.ca>; "Dan Fitzgerald"
> > >>>>>>> <danf@danf.net>; "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>; "Edith.
> > Cody-
> > >>>>>>> Rice" <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>; "Barry Winters"
> > >>>>>>> <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>;
> > >>>>>>> "eachtem" <eachtem@hotmail.com>; "danadurf" <
> danadurf@hotmail.com
> > >;
> > >>>>>>> "dean Ray"
> > >>>>>>> <deanr0032@hotmail.com>; "dean" <dean@law.ualberta.ca>;
> "dean.law"
> > >>>>>>> <dean.law@mcgill.ca>; "Dean.Buzza" <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
> > >>>>>>> <kevin.Jackson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> > >>>>>>> Cc: <oldmaison@yahoo.com>; "tracy" <tracy@jatam.org>;
> > >>>>>>> <David.ALWARD@gnb.ca>;
> > >>>>>>> "Richard Harris" <injusticecoalition@hotmail.com>
> > >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 11:06 PM
> > >>>>>>> Subject: Fwd: The Reykjavík Grapevine Al Jazeera Iceland
> > >>>>>>> WikiLeaks and British Banksters etc
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > >>>>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 01:58:58 -0300
> > >>>>>>> Subject: RE: The Reykjavík Grapevine Al Jazeera Iceland WikiLeaks
> > >>>>>>> and British Banksters etc
> > >>>>>>> To: grapevine@grapevine.is,
> > >>>>>>> Cc: editor@wikileaks.org,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r879_ZTqaY8
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> From: "Julian Assange)" editor@wikileaks.org
> > >>>>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 3:15 PM
> > >>>>>>> Subject: Al Jazeera on Iceland's plan for a press safe haven
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> FYI: Al-Jazeera's take on Iceland's proposed media safe haven
> > >>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbGiPjIE1pE
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> More info http://immi.is/
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Julian Assange Editor WikiLeaks http://wikileaks.org/
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> From: "David Amos" david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>> To: "Julian Assange)" editor@wikileaks.org
> > >>>>>>> Cc: "Dan Fitzgerald" danf@danf.net; "Byrne. G"
> Byrne.G@parl.gc.ca
> > >>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:35 PM
> > >>>>>>> Subject: Re: Al Jazeera on Iceland's new plan Thanx Here is
> > >>>>>>> something about Iceland and Banksters Al Jazeera would enjoy
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Checkout this old pdf file from 2005 at about page two or three
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/4304560/Speaker-Iceland-etc
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Then read on and chuckle
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> From: postur@fjr.stjr.is
> > >>>>>>> Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009
> > >>>>>>> Subject: Re: RE: Iceland and Bankers etc I must ask the obvious
> > >>>>>>> question. Why have you people ignored me for three years?
> > >>>>>>> To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Dear David Amos
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Unfortunately there has been a considerable delay in responding
> to
> > >>>>>>> incoming letters due to heavy workload and many inquiries to our
> > >>>>>>> office.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> We appreciate the issue raised in your letter. We have set up a
> web
> > >>>>>>> site www.iceland.org where we have gathered various practical
> > >>>>>>> information regarding the economic crisis in Iceland.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Greetings from the Ministry of Finance.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Tilvísun í mál: FJR08100024
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> From: postur@for.stjr.is
> > >>>>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008
> > >>>>>>> Subject: Regarding your enquiry to the Prime Ministry of Iceland
> > >>>>>>> To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> David Raymond Amos
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Your enquiry has been received by the Prime Ministry of Iceland
> and
> > >>>>>>> waits attendance.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Thank you.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008
> > >>>>>>> Subject: I just called to remind the Speaker, the Bankers and the
> > >>>>>>> Icelanders that I still exist EH Mrs Mrechant, Bob Rae and Iggy?
> > >>>>>>> To: Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca, sjs@althingi.is, emb.ottawa@mfa.is,
> > >>>>>>> rmellish@pattersonlaw.ca, irisbirgisdottir@yahoo.ca,
> > >>>>>>> marie@mariemorneau.com, dfranklin@franklinlegal.com,
> > >>>>>>> egilla@althingi.is, william.turner@exsultate.ca
> > >>>>>>> Cc: Rae.B@parl.gc.ca, Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca,
> > lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca,
> > >>>>>>> merchp@sen.parl.gc.ca, coolsa@sen.parl.gc.ca,
> > olived@sen.parl.gc.ca
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> All of you should review the documents and CD that came with this
> > >>>>>>> letter ASAP EH?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/4304560/Speaker-Iceland-etc
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/5352095/Tony-Merchant-and-Yankees
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Perhaps Geir Haarde and Steingrimur Sigfusson should call me back
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Veritas Vincit
> > >>>>>>> David Raymond Amos
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> The Reykjavík Grapevine
> > >>>>>>> Hafnarstræti 15
> > >>>>>>> 101 Reykjavík
> > >>>>>>> Iceland
> > >>>>>>> grapevine@grapevine.is
> > >>>>>>> +354-540-3600
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > >>>> From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
> > >>>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
> > >>>> Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada
> and
> > >>>> the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still
> > >>>> alive
> > >>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> > >>>>
> > >>>> This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has
> received
> > >>>> your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not
> reply
> > >>>> to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Le ministre de la Défense nationale accuse réception de votre
> > >>>> courriel. Celui-ci sera examiné en temps opportun. Veuillez ne pas
> > >>>> répondre à ce courriel puisque la présente est une réponse
> > >>>> automatique.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Clearly I corrected some of my spelling before I forwarded this emal
> > to
> > >>>> others
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > >>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> > >>>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
> > >>>> Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and
> the
> > >>>> War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
> > >>>> To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil,
> > >>>> Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, john.adams@cse-cst.gc.ca,
> > >>>> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, stoffp1 <stoffp1@parl.gc.ca>,
> > >>>> dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca,
> information@forces.gc.ca
> > ,
> > >>>> milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca,
> > >>>> sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari
> > >>>> <smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
> > >>>> susan@blueskystrategygroup.com, Don@blueskystrategygroup.com,
> > >>>> eugene@blueskystrategygroup.com, americas@aljazeera.net
> > >>>> Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice" <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin"
> > >>>> <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower
> > >>>> <whistleblower@ctv.ca>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters
> David
> > >>>> Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's
> > >>>> Health Caree system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on
> > >>>> CAPACduring her last days in office as if she were eoh so
> > >>>> elthical.. To be fair to him I just called Greg Weston
> (613-288-6938)
> > >>>> I suggested that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It
> > >>>> would be wise if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes
> > >>>> something else about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the
> > fact
> > >>>> that your old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera
> > >>>> English
> > >>>> never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is
> > >>>> interesting though
> > >>>>
> > >>>> http://www.blueskystrategygroup.com/index.php/team/don-newman/
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> >
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/media/story/2010/05/04/al-jazeera-english-launch.html
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
> > >>>> this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
> > >>>> Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or
> Brad
> > >>>> Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not
> > >>>> a shy political animal
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Veritas Vincit
> > >>>> David Raymond Amos
> > >>>> 902 800 0369
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Enjoy Mr Weston
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> >
> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/news/story/2011/05/15/weston-iraq-invasion-wikileaks.html
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
> > >>>> brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
> > >>>> says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were
> helping
> > >>>> to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
> > >>>> including a Canadian general.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
> > >>>> who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of
> 35,000
> > >>>> U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk
> was
> > >>>> also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that
> helped
> > >>>> prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2010/06/canada-and-united-states.html
> > >>>>
> > >>>> "I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
> > >>>> being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
> > >>>> demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing.
> American
> > >>>> "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
> > >>>> into the US policy.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of
> my
> > >>>> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
> > >>>> in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that
> would
> > >>>> report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation.There
> was
> > >>>> never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where
> there
> > >>>> were deployed WMD.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike
> and
> > >>>> invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
> > >>>> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the
> occupation
> > >>>> (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
> > >>>> about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they
> at
> > >>>> that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
> > >>>> authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned
> to
> > >>>> its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was
> contrary
> > >>>> to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
> > >>>> folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
> > >>>> upon."What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions
> are
> > >>>> to met before US troop can redeploy?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Prime Minister Jean Chretien and the PMO were even at the very
> > >>>> preliminary planning stages wary of Canadian involvement in an Iraq
> > >>>> operation....History would prove them correct. The political
> pressure
> > >>>> being applied on the PMO from the George W Bush administration was
> > >>>> onerous
> > >>>>
> > >>>> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
> > >>>> military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that
> Canadian
> > >>>> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine
> operations
> > >>>> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in
> Afghanistan
> > >>>> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
> > >>>> operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
> > >>>> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
> > >>>> ....not necessarily in that order. "
> > >>>>
> > >>>> You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
> > >>>> Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> http://www.socom.mil/SOCOMHome/Pages/ContactUSSOCOM.aspx
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > >>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> > >>>> Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 20:42:46 -0300
> > >>>> Subject: Fwd: Response to your calls of April 9 and May 12, 2010
> > >>>> To: Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, Barry Winters
> > >>>> <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, robin reid <zorroboy2009@hotmail.com>, dean
> Ray
> > >>>> <deanr0032@hotmail.com>, dean <dean@law.ualberta.ca>, danadurf
> > >>>> <danadurf@hotmail.com>, Richard Harris
> > >>>> <injusticecoalition@hotmail.com>, "oldmaison@yahoo.com"
> > >>>> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "Edith. Cody-Rice" <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>,
> > >>>> "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, "john.adams"
> > >>>> <john.adams@cse-cst.gc.ca>, "william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca"
> > >>>> <william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles. Blinn"
> > >>>> <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Mackap <Mackap@parl.gc.ca>, toewsv1
> > >>>> <toewsv1@mts.net>
> > >>>> Cc:
--
Sent from a mobile device. I APOLOGIZE!
No comments:
Post a Comment