Wednesday, 8 June 2016
So much for Dr. James Sears and his buddies bitching about your actions with Canada Post against him EH Minister Judy Foote?
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 17:55:37 -0400
Subject: So much for Dr. James Sears and his buddies bitching about your actions with Canada Post against him EH Minister Judy Foote?
To: "judy.foote.a1" <judy.foote.a1@parl.gc.ca>, minister@pwgsc.gc.ca, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson" <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "ralph.goodale.a1" <ralph.goodale.a1@parl.gc.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "john.warr" <john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "roger.l.brown" <roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Dale.Morgan" <Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "david.hansen" <david.hansen@justice.gc.ca>, "jill.chisholm" <jill.chisholm@justice.gc.ca>, "bill.pentney" <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, ward32news <ward32news@yahoo.ca>, leader@ncparty.ca, Ezra <Ezra@therebel.media>, Brian Ruhe <brian@brianruhe.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, sunrayzulu <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, "Paul.Lynch" <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>, teddyspalace <teddyspalace@gmail.com>, patrick_doran1 <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, cps <cps@calgarypolice.ca>, gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>, investigations <investigations@cbc.ca>, w5 <w5@ctv.ca>, nmoore <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, radical <radical@radicalpress.com>, paul <paul@paulfromm.com>
Seems that people can write and talk a lot but nobody can read worth a
good god damn nor do they know how to use the phone.
Trust that even though I have no respect for the fans of Hitler they
are not nearly as offensive as Ezzy Baby Levant's # 1 fanboys the evil
fellow Zionist Barry Winters of Edmonton and his cohorts such as Patty
Baby Doran and Eddy Atchem of Calgary and Dean Roger Ray of Sylvan
Lake. Nesy Pas Mr Prime Minister Trudeau "The Younger" ???
Ward News
http://www.yourwardnews.ca/ward32news.pdf
The Radical Press
http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=9524
The Baconfat Chronicles
http://eateshite.blogspot.ca/2016/05/justin-trudeau-is-fucked.html
and The Baconfat Papers
http://sunrayzulu.blogspot.ca/2016/05/katherine-wynn-is-fucking-dyke.html
Censorship Canada: Your Ward News & Editor Banned from Sending or Receiving Mail
Brian Ruhe
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUoBN86A2pw
Byway of Trudel's order (which is hereto attached) obviously I must go
to the Federal Court of Appeal in Fat Fred City and file a motion on
or before this Friday. We all know that court is a long way from the
Supreme Court on the Rock. However my document been before the Supreme
Court of Newfoundland a few times already starting way back in early
2005 on behalf of your old friend and neighbour Byron Prior when Big
Bad Billy Matthews your fellow Librano whose seat you now .sued him
Remember?
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/05/nfld-whistleblower-dodges-libel-charge.html
2005 01 T 0010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
TRIAL DIVISION
BETWEEN:
WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF
AND:
BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT
AND BETWEEN:
BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT/PLAINTIFF
BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF/FIRST DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: T. ALEX HICKMAN SECOND DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: THOMAS MARSHALL THIRD DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: DANNY WILLIAMS FOURTH DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: EDWARD M. ROBERTS FIFTH DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: JOHN CROSBIE SIXTH DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM
AND: PATTERSON PALMER SEVENTH DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM
SUMMARY OF CURRENT DOCUMENT
Court File Number(s):2005 01 T 0010
Date of Filing of Document: 25 January 2005
Name of Filing Party or Person: Stephen J. May
Application to which Document being filed relates: Amended Application
of the Plaintiff/Defendant by Counterclaim to maintain an Order
restricting publication, to strike portions of the Statement of
Defence, strike the Counterclaim in it's entirety, and to refer this
proceeding to case management.
Statement of purpose in filing: To maintain an Order restricting
publication, to strike portions of the Statement of Defence, strike
the Counterclaim in its entirety and refer this proceeding to case
management.
A F F I D A V I T
I, Stephen J. May, of the City of St. John's, in the Province of
Newfoundland and Labrador, Barrister and Solicitor, make oath and say
as follows:
THAT I am a Partner in the St. John's office of PATTERSON PALMER
solicitors for William Matthews, the Member of Parliament for
Random-Burin-St. George's in the Parliament of Canada.
THAT Mr. Matthews originally retained Mr. Edward Roberts, Q.C. on or
about 30 April 2002 after Mr. Byron Prior, the Defendant/Plaintiff by
Counterclaim, had made allegations against Mr. Matthews in a
publication called "My Inheritance - The truth - Not Fiction: A Town
with a Secret". In that publication, the allegation was made that Mr.
Matthews had had sex with a girl who had been prostituted by her
mother. That girl was alleged to have been Mr. Prior's sister.
THAT upon being retained, Mr. Edward Roberts wrote a letter to Mr.
Prior. That letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit "1" to my
Affidavit.
THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts' letter to Mr. Prior, Mr. Roberts
received a 1 May 2002 e-mail from Mr. Prior. That e-mail is attached
as Exhibit "2".
THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts receipt of the e-mail, Mr. Prior swore
an Affidavit acknowledging that what had been said in that publication
was false. That Affidavit is attached as Exhibit "3" to my Affidavit.
Following Mr. Roberts' receipt of that Affidavit, Mr. Matthews advised
that he was satisfied not to pursue the matter any further and our
firm closed our file.
THAT on or about 25 October 2004, I was retained by Mr. Matthews
following his gaining knowledge that a web site, made a series of
allegations against him relating to my having sex with a girl of
approximately 12 years old through to an approximate age of 15 years
old. It also accused him of being a father of one of her children and
accused him of having raped that girl. Upon checking the web site I
saw that Byron Prior, the Defendant, had been identified as the author
of the material on the site.
THAT Mr. Matthews instructed me to write Mr. Prior, to remind him of
the fact that the allegations had been admitted to being false through
a 16 May 2002 Affidavit to advise him of Mr. Matthews' intentions to
commence legal proceedings if the comments were not removed from the
web site. A copy of my letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit "4"
to this Affidavit.
THAT I attach as Exhibit "5" a transcript from a 5 November 2004
voicemail left by David Amos, identified in the voicemail as a friend
of Mr. Prior.
THAT I attach as Exhibit "6" a portion of a 6 November 2004 e-mail
from Mr. Amos.
THAT until I received his voicemail and e-mail, I had never heard of Mr. Amos.
THAT Mr. Amos has continued to send me e-mail since his 5 November
e-mail. Including his 6 November 2004 e-mail, I have received a total
of 15 e-mails as of 23 January 2005. All do not address Mr. Matthews'
claim or my involvement as Mr. Matthews' solicitor. I attach as
Exhibit "7" a portion of a 12 January 2005 e-mail that Mr. Amos sent
to me but originally came to my attention through Ms. Lois Skanes
whose firm had received a copy. This e-mail followed the service of
the Statement of Claim on 11 January 2005 on Mr. Prior. I also attach
as Exhibit "8" a copy of a 19 January 2005 e-mail from Mr. Amos.
THAT I attach as Exhibit "9" a copy of a 22 November 2004 letter
addressed to me from Edward Roberts, the Lieutenant Governor of
Newfoundland and Labrador covering a 2 September 2004 letter from Mr.
Amos addressed to John Crosbie, Edward Roberts, in his capacity as
Lieutenant Governor, Danny Williams, in his capacity as Premier of
Newfoundland and Labrador, and Brian F. Furey, President of the Law
Society of Newfoundland and Labrador. I requested a copy of this
letter from Government House after asking Mr. Roberts if he had
received any correspondence from Mr. Amos during his previous
representation of Mr. Matthews. He advised me that he received a
letter since becoming Lieutenant Governor, portions of which involved
his representation of Mr. Matthews. Mr. Roberts' letter also covered
his reply to Mr. Amos.
THAT I attach as Exhibit "10" an e-mail from Mr. Amos received on
Sunday, 23 January 2005.
THAT I swear this Affidavit in support of the Application to strike
Mr. Prior's counterclaim.
SWORN to before me at
St. John's, Province of Newfoundland and Labrador this 24th day of
January, 2005.
Signed by Della Hart
STEPHEN J. MAY
Signature STAMP
DELLA HART
A Commissioner for Oaths in and for
the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador. My commission expires on
December 31, 2009
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Dr. James Sears, NCP Leader" <leader@ncparty.ca>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 16:04:02 -0400
Subject: My publisher Leroy St. Germaine says you're looking for me ...
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
David:
I have not had a chance yet to read your longer email. Please get back in
touch with me after your Supreme Court appearance.
EXPEL THE PARASITE!
Dr. James Sears
Founder and Leader
New Constitution Party of Canada
> i have his # he has some bones to pick with Judy Foote sounds like a
> valuable ally LeRoy also you might Google David Amos he is in newfoundland
> he will be in supreme court tomorrow and Monday
>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Ministre / Minister (SPAC/PSPC)" <TPSGC.Ministre-Minister.PWGSC@tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 17:55:42 -0400
Subject: Accusé réception / Acknowledgement
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Le présent message accuse réception de votre courriel au ministre des Services publics et de l’Approvisionnement. Soyez assuré(e) que nous y accorderons toute l’attention voulue.
___________________________________________________________________________
This message is to acknowledge receipt of your email to the Minister of the Public Services and Procurement. Please be assured it will be given every consideration.
http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=9544
Globe & Mail steps up to the “free speech” plate to support Dr. James Sears & YOUR WARD NEWS publication
June 8, 2016 by admin Leave a Comment
ATEditorRedCap200
[Editor’s Note: While this article is far from being a ringing endorsement for the repeal of Canada’s anti-free speech legislation contained in Section 318 to 320 of the Canadian Criminal Code it definitely is a good start in the right direction. Apart from the standard zionist show of obeisance in Marcus Gee’s needless epithets aimed at Dr. Sear’s character and motives the focus on government and private corporate (Canada Post) censorship is refreshing to see in a msm publication and, in Facebook is deserving of a “like”.]
Postal censorship is a cure worse than the disease
By MARCUS GEE
The Globe and Mail
June 7th, 2016
Dr.SearsG&Mpic
Canadians who value free speech – and let’s hope that is all of us – should be deeply troubled by Ottawa’s decision to tell Canada Post to stop carrying a fringe Toronto newspaper. Public Services Minister Judy Foote ordered the postal service to cease delivering Your Ward News, which has been accused of being anti-Semitic and pro-Nazi. Her “interim prohibitory order” gives its editor 10 days to appeal.
This is a catch-all ASF view; only displays when an unsupported article type is put in an ASF drop zone
Those who have campaigned against the free paper are “ecstatic.” But consider the awful precedent this act of postal censorship sets.
If people who are offended by something that appears in their mailbox can complain and get it banned from the post, where does it stop? Can a pro-choice feminist block the graphic pro-life pamphlet that comes in the mail? Can a fierce pro-lifer ban a flier from an abortion clinic? Or consider the feelings of the victim of East European communism who gets a Marxist tract in the mail? Why should an agency of the government that her taxes support be allowed to introduce that propaganda into her home?
This is the trouble with just about all limits on free speech. Who says what is beyond the pale? Deciding to block child pornography or open incitement to violence is easy enough, because of the direct physical harm they can be shown to cause. After that, it gets tricky.
Someone must have the power to determine what is dangerous or odious speech and what is merely passionate expression. It is always a matter of opinion. The line is impossible to draw, the scope for abuse endless.
Even in democratic countries, authorities have often succumbed to the impulse to black out what they don’t like. Communist propaganda was blocked on the grounds that it threatened national security, erotica on the grounds that it undermined public morals. The postal system was once one of the main agents of censorship. A century ago, postal censors blocked mailed instalments of James Joyce’s Ulysses.
Your Ward News is not Ulysses. Its editor, James Sears, who has been known to style himself as Dimitri the Lover, told City News that Hitler is his second-biggest idol, after Jesus. He ends his e-mails “Expel the Parasite!” – all in capital letters, of course. The group that has been fighting him calls his publication a “neo-Nazi-rag” that “has been permitted to disseminate racism, homophobia, misogyny and anti-Semitism to as many as 300,000 homes in Toronto.”
If so, there are a couple of ways to fight back short of censorship. One is simply to toss Your Ward News where it belongs: in the recycling bin. Nobody is forced to read it when it comes in the mail. People like Mr. Sears thrive on the oxygen of attention. Ignoring him is the best revenge.
Another is to argue back. If his opponents feel his maunderings are too despicable to pass over, they can always denounce or refute him. It is always better to fight speech with speech than to gag the speaker.
It is a good time to remember these old lessons about how to handle troublesome speech. Free expression is always under attack to some degree, and the danger seems especially acute today. The little tussle over Your Ward News is part of a wider struggle.
Overseas, authoritarian governments from Moscow to Beijing to Cairo are cracking down on the right to speak openly without fear. Canadians got a small glimpse of their attitude when China’s foreign minister dressed down a reporter in Ottawa for daring to ask a question about human rights. At home, on university campuses and beyond, the tendency to take offence is stifling healthy debate and silencing dissenting voices.
Sometimes those voices can be obnoxious, but it won’t do to try to snuff them out. Ottawa has no business telling the postal service to censor the mail just because some people don’t like what comes through the slot.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/toronto/postal-censorship-is-a-cure-worse-than-the-disease/article30345773/
On 6/8/16, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> Clearly Judy Foote and her minions got my email today just like on May
> 27th EH?So why do they play so dumb on the phone and deny getting my
> emails?
>
> Need I say that yesterday I saw the RCMP reviewing my old emails etc
> published on the Internet the over the past 11 years? It begs the
> ovbious question why don't the cops answer my latest stuff while I am
> before the Federal Court?
>
> Just Dave
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 23,798
> Domain Name (Unknown)
> IP Address 199.212.150.# (Royal Canadian Mounted Police)
> ISP Royal Canadian Mounted Police
> Location
> Continent : North America
> Country : Canada (Facts)
> State/Region : Ontario
> City : Ottawa
> Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
> Language English (Canada) en-ca
> Operating System Microsoft WinNT
> Browser Mozilla 6.1
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko
> Javascript version 1.5
> Monitor
> Resolution : 1920 x 1080
> Color Depth : 24 bits
> Time of Visit Jun 7 2016 1:57:28 pm
> Last Page View Jun 7 2016 1:57:28 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.google.ca...nSbOcXm7LtLQMnHrwuiw
> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...6/10/for-record.html
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...6/10/for-record.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-7:00
> Visitor's Time Jun 7 2016 10:57:28 am
> Visit Number 23,798
>
> QSLS Politics
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 36,371
> Domain Name (Unknown)
> IP Address 199.212.150.# (Royal Canadian Mounted Police)
> ISP Royal Canadian Mounted Police
> Location
> Continent : North America
> Country : Canada (Facts)
> State/Region : Ontario
> City : Ottawa
> Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
> Language English (Canada)
> en-ca
> Operating System Microsoft WinNT
> Browser Mozilla 6.1
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko
> Javascript version 1.5
> Monitor
> Resolution : 1920 x 1080
> Color Depth : 24 bits
> Time of Visit Jun 7 2016 7:46:32 pm
> Last Page View Jun 7 2016 7:53:56 pm
> Visit Length 7 minutes 24 seconds
> Page Views 16
> Referring URL http://www.google.ca...luGFlwsqytD927reAw7g
> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....email-to-ottawa.html
> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....email-to-ottawa.html
> Out Click
> https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjVpHzMcaW9YqWquGF1aI2ao9ZiRBvJuMHewt9Bwl-kLVuLGDaWRB0vkykIq8uAcM9G5IdXy2bmV_wFWPrcnunhOvXHvy7c0E4g5uC-4Gx23lIa-S1NNTU2h32uzIelXP_J1UkSPMq35MQS/s35/100_0245.JPG
> https://www.blogger....06553336660119659315
> Time Zone UTC-7:00
> Visitor's Time Jun 7 2016 11:46:32 am
> Visit Number 36,371
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Ministre / Minister (SPAC/PSPC)"
> <TPSGC.Ministre-Minister.PWGSC@tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca>
> Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 14:47:05 -0400
> Subject: Accusé réception / Acknowledgement
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Le présent message accuse réception de votre courriel au ministre des
> Services publics et de l’Approvisionnement. Soyez assuré(e) que nous y
> accorderons toute l’attention voulue.
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
>
>
> This message is to acknowledge receipt of your email to the Minister
> of the Public Services and Procurement. Please be assured it will be
> given every consideration.
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Harper, Stephen - M.P.
> To: motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
> Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 7:29 AM
> Subject: RE: They read this stuff Monday
>
> Thank you for your e-mail message to Stephen Harper, Leader of the
> Opposition. Your views and suggestions are important to us. Once
> they have been carefully considered, you may receive a further reply.
> *Remember to include your mailing address if you would like a response.
>
> If you prefer to send your thoughts by regular mail, please address them
> to:
>
> Stephen Harper, M.P.
> Leader of the Opposition
> House of Commons
> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6
>
> Mail may be sent postage free to any Member of Parliament.
>
> You can also reach Mr. Harper by fax at: (613) 947-0310
>
>
> Merci d’avoir écrit à Stephen Harper, le chef de l’opposition
> officielle. Votre opinion est importante pour nous. Lorsque nous
> l’aurons étudiée avec soin, nous pourrons vous faire parvenir une
> réponse.
>
> *N’oubliez pas d’inclure votre adresse postale si vous voulez recevoir
> une réponse.
>
> Si vous préférez nous écrire en utilisant les services postaux
> régulièrs, veuillez le faire au :
>
> Stephen Harper, député
> Chef de l’opposition officielle
> Chambre des communes
> Ottawa (Ontario) K1A 0A6
>
> Vous pouvez écrire sans affranchissement à tous les députés fédéraux.
>
> Vous pouvez également joindre M. Harper par fax au (613) 947-0310.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: Harper.S@parl.gc.ca
> Cc: premier@gov.nl.ca ; tedcardwell@mail.gov.nf.ca
> Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 7:31 AM
> Subject: Fw: They read this stuff Monday
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: rarespade@nfld.net
> Cc: Byron Prior
> Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 7:28 AM
> Subject: They read this stuff Monday
>
> September 15th, 2004
>
> Liliana Longo Senior General Counsel
> C/o Assistant Commissioner Gerry Lynch
> RCMP B Division Headquarters
> 100 East Hills Rd
> PO Box 9700
> St. Johns NF A1A 3T5
>
> RE: Corruption
>
> Hey,
>
> Please find enclosed an exact copy of all material served upon
> Lieutenant Governor Roberts by my friend Byron Prior. The copy of
> wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence as law
> enforcement authorities in order that it may be properly investigated.
> I have also enclosed a copy of the correspondence between the RCMP
> External Review Committee and I. As you review the same material they
> got, you can see the folks in BC were contacted almost one year ago.
> Apparently the dumb bastards don’t know how to read. If these are the
> best lawyers Anne McLellan has got to send against me, the government
> is about to be embarrassed big time by a simple Maritimer.
>
> Whereas I have now received my answer from the Lieutenant
> Governor of New Brunswick and the RCMP External Review Committee, I am
> about to file my own complaints. I have given up on my native land
> protecting my dumb ass. If you have any questions may I suggest that
> you take my matter up with Anne McLellan or Jack Hooper.
>
> With respect to my friend Byron Prior’s sad complaint, let me
> be the first layman to congratulate the RCMP in the fine job they did
> covering up his matters for the benefit many corrupt politicians for
> some many years. It is too bad that the RCMP weren’t so diligent in
> upholding the law. Lets see if I can have any luck tearing the mask of
> virtue off of the RCMP and the likes of T. Alex Hickman for the
> benefit of all the simple folk like Byron and I.
>
> Shame on all of you. Say hey to the cop in the picture that was
> guarding Harper on June 19th will ya? I need to know his name and
> summons him to court to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing
> but the truth. He can bring his god along to help if he thinks it
> necessary but I would rather he bring his conscience. What say you? If
> I don’t get an answer from you by Oct3rd. I will be due to sue you
> too. What do you think should I complain of the RCMP in a court
> Newfoundland or New Brunswick?
>
> I already know Byron’s answer.
>
> Cya’ll in Court :)
>
>
> David R. Amos
>
> 153 Alvin Ave.
>
> Milton, MA. 02186
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: Harper.S@parl.gc.ca
> Cc: premier@gov.nl.ca ; tedcardwell@mail.gov.nf.ca ; rarespade@nfld.net
> Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 10:53 AM
> Subject: Fw: Round 2
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: pierrebl@apex.gc.ca
> Cc: cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ; florence.ievers@swc-cfc.gc.ca
> ; mskinner@cmhc-schl.gc.ca ; donna.achimov@sdc-dsc.gc.ca ;
> line.lacombe-laurin@ccra-adrc.gc.ca ;
> marie-josee.martel@ccra-adrc.gc.ca ; brian.keirstead@gnb.ca ; Byron
> Prior
> Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 8:45 AM
> Subject: Round 2
>
> September 17th, 2004
>
>
> Ronald A. Irwin and Cynthia Merlini.
> C/o Josie Maguire
> Canadian Consulate
> 3 Copley Place,
> Boston, MA. 02108
>
> Corruption, you folks and the scope of your employment.
>
> Hey,
>
> Remember me? I am the guy that has been calling you and
> emailing you for the last couple of weeks. Well now I have just come
> to your office with a witness in order to prove later that I delivered
> this promised material in person. I do not wish to discuss these
> matters with any of your people within your offices. Simply put, I do
> not trust any of you. I fear that you will just be another bunch of
> lawyers like B.J. Johnson, Angela Troccoli. Clayton Ruby and several
> others who would attempt to charge me with criminal harassment in
> order that Ashcroft or CSIS may sweep me under the carpet of
> corruption and protect the interests of many a low man in high places.
> I would prefer all words between us to be said in a public forum
> either in open court in front of a jury of my peers or elsewhere. I
> realize that you can claim that you did not read or listen to the
> material that I sent to your boss byway of your office last year but
> merely forwarded it to Anne McLellan and her cohorts. I understand
> that you can escape criminal prosecution in the USA because of your
> right to immunity here but I am not certain the rules apply to one
> Canadian against another in a civil action. No matter though, I can
> certainly complain of you in Canada. I will not hesitate to do so in
> the very near future.
>
> I can vividly remember contacting your office in August of
> 2003 after the RCMP were hassling my friends up home while the Secret
> Service and many cops were hassling me down here. Now it appears they
> are up to their same old tricks again. The other night someone
> claiming to be a RCMP officer by the name of Cst. Plourde called a
> lady friend of mine with many questions as to my whereabouts and
> plans. Whoever called knew much about the contents of a package I had
> given in person to another RCMP officer, Graham Milner. The person
> called would not give my friend his number in order for me to return
> his call. This did not seem like proper conduct for a RCMP officer and
> I suspected foul play. I called Norm Plourde yesterday at 506 452-3724
> and asked him what he wanted to know about me. He claimed to have no
> idea as to what I was talking about. I believed him because his
> English was far better than that of the Frenchman that called my
> friend. With my suspicions affirmed I then called J Division in
> Hampton at 506 832-5566 and managed to speak to Cst. Dave Hanson to
> report the impersonation of a RCMP officer. We shall see where his
> investigation leads if anywhere at all. Methinks whoever called was
> merely on a fishing expedition after I questioned the actions of the
> RCMP officer John deWinter on Sept 9th.
>
> I did so before a hearing had started in Provincial Court
> and in front of many witnesses in order to make many people start
> asking the former Town clowns a few questions. Obviously the cops are
> confused by the fact that I was nowhere to be found and had left
> behind my Lincoln Towncar that they had been following around all
> summer. I need it to remain in Canada to use as evidence against the
> malice of the Massachusetts Dept. of Motor Vehicle Registry and others
> involved in Insurance Fraud and Taxation issues within our probate
> matters. I do not want that car destroyed like all the others were
> that were taken from our property at 37 Pond Ave in Plymouth without
> due process of law. Within one day of the MA Registry sticker on my
> car expiring Cst. Belliveau of the Sussex RCMP pounced on me and
> questioned me as to why it had not been renewed. I immediately served
> upon him in front of witnesses the reasons why I could not. I had
> explained to Graham Milner the same reasons in person earlier but that
> did not stop the harassment within an hour or so.
>
> On October 1st the Commonwealth of Massachusetts will
> refuse to renew my wife’s drivers license or the stickers on other
> cars because she and I refuse to pay the excise taxes on a vehicles
> that the State helped steal from us. She had owned her truck since new
> in 1986 and we had always paid our taxes. However when the Plymouth
> Police Dept. expect us to pay for their services in order to stop me
> from preventing criminals from stealing and destroying our property we
> are greatly offended. We had made the Registry’s Legal Dept. well
> aware of our troubles and yet they continued to act against us. On Oct
> 3rd, my wife’s birthday I will begin our legal actions to make the
> Commonwealth of Massachusetts and many others pay much relief for the
> personal injury it has caused us.
>
> Recently I have received quite a flood of documents
> either dated on or about Sept 3rd or sent much later and backdated to
> that date. It appears that my adversaries were certain that either my
> goose was cooked on that date or they realized it was not and were
> trying to cover their butts. A good example would be the following: As
> you can I have finally received my answer from the Acadian Lieutenant
> Governor of New Brunswick. His malice is obvious. He sent his answer
> on September 13th but he backdated it to Sept3rd. Byron Prior had
> already served the Lieutenant Governor of Newfoundland and I had
> mailed his boss Adrienne Clarkson the same stuff myself on Sept 2nd
> because he had not answered me. Obviously he was trying to cover his
> butt but he can’t fool me. I am too stupid. Unless many Canadians act
> ethically and quickly, I shall sue the Queen for his actions alone.
>
> I remember talking to some woman in your office who
> appeared to be taking notes and giving me false hope that she would
> get back to me. Clearly she never did but Josie Maguire did over one
> year later after I had declared to Cynthia Merlini’s voicemail machine
> that I had given up on you folks and your ethics. I returned Ms.
> Maguire’s call but I just got another machine so I sent an email.
>
> I had called you folks the same day last year that I had
> contacted the RCMP in Ottawa. The RCMP officers had just been to a
> friend of mine’s house two weekends in a row investigating something
> that was not true within minutes of my calling him and asking him what
> he recalled about the cops harassing us twice in the same evening in
> Massachusetts the year before. I was also aware that the local RCMP
> had charged a well know friend of mine with the most ridiculous
> criminal charge while they had ignored me concerns for years. I had
> just talked to some woman who refused to identify herself at the RCMP
> HQ in Ottawa. She claimed that she knew all about my matters but hung
> up on me the second I mentioned the wiretap tapes so I called the
> Consulate to protect my butt.
>
> Your people should remember the confirmed mail that I sent
> to your boss in Washington byway of your offices last year. If not you
> will find it enclosed and attached to the document I served upon the
> new Member of Parliament Rob Moore during our political campaigns in
> June of this year. At least Anne McLellan responded to the aforesaid
> correspondence but she wasn’t long blaming Wayne Easter for his
> failures while neglecting to mention her own inability to read.
>
> Much to Mr. Ashcroft’s chagrin and without your assistance
> clearly I made it back to the USA to stand in Dorchester District
> Court on Sept 3rd and then to return to Canada in order to appear in
> New Brunswick Provincial Court on Sept 9th.
>
> It is also obvious that I also made it back again to the
> USA in order to stand in Norfolk Probate Court on Sept 13th and Sept
> 21st in order to protect my family’s interests. Some of the original
> wiretap tapes mentioned within these documents and to you last year
> have been on file in the Public Record in Dorchester District Court
> since Sept. 3rd. There are six others floating around Canada either in
> the hands of CSIS or the RCMP. I have kept the original of tape
> numbered 139 to give to the people recorded upon it so that they may
> use it in their own complaints.
>
> I have yet to make a pleading in the Criminal Complaint
> against me by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in Dorchester District
> Court. I will wait until the Judge decides on Oct 1st as to whether or
> not the court has jurisdiction to hear the matter. It has been over
> three months since I first tried to speak to the Suffolk County
> District Attorney about the matter and now over two weeks since I met
> his ADA in court. I have heard nothing from them and I likely will not
> before Oct 1st. I regard the Suffolk DA as just another political
> lawyer who is more than willing to prosecute me with false allegations
> in order to protect his friends from their own wrongs. The Suffolk
> County DA has had long enough to get honest. Now it is my to try to
> see him prosecuted. His delay is for reasons of lucre and malice.I
> will file a motion as the judge suggested in order to allow the DA the
> prescribed time to answer it. However I see no reason for the judge
> not to apply sanctions against the DA in light of the fact that he
> never disclosed any notice of any evidence to be used against me
> before I was compelled to answer the malicious complaint. Nor was the
> DA willing to discuss the matter before compelling me to file a motion
> in order to expose his wrongs. This letter with all of its enclosures
> will be amongst the exhibits filed with the aforesaid motion in order
> to prove the matter falls under the jurisdiction of federal court. It
> is also filed in this fashion because I strongly doubt the DA would
> pot the material I sent him into the Public Record. It is too late for
> the DA to withdraw the complaint in an ethical fashion. Either he
> prosecutes me or I sue him. It is just that simple. I demand my right
> to trial in front of a jury in federal court or see the DA prosecuted
> for his malice.
>
> I also have a Motion to Dismiss the Probate matter started
> by the Shulman law firm in Norfolk Probate Court. It has been marked
> to be heard on Oct 12th .It appears that she is now attempting to
> separate her actions from that of the Shulman law firm however she
> still calls my wife from that law firm’s phone number. The very same
> Trial Court system that failed to give us any notice whatsoever of a
> Trial concerning our interests on Sept 9th in Plymouth Probate Court
> expects me to have a Pretrial Conference on Sept. 21st with the very
> lawyer that made false allegations against me in Dorchester District
> Court. All the while the entire Membership of the Massachusetts State
> House from the Governor on down has known the truth from before the
> time he was elected Governor and I have made certain that every
> Senator and Representative as well as many government lawyers have
> been made well aware since. Whereas I strongly doubt that the DA will
> file the evidence that he will attempt to use against me in the public
> record by Oct 1st, I find it necessary for me to do so. It is enclosed
> for you and the Canadian Justice System to review.
>
> As you can see since the time that I first contacted you I
> have also made many politicians and other lawyers in Canada and the
> USA well aware of my concerns but to no avail. All I have received in
> return for my diligence in the pursuit of justice has been more
> harassment and further proof of corruption.
>
> Please find enclosed exactly the same material sent to the
> General Counsel of the RCMP today and the local office of the FBI over
> one year ago. The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you
> Mr. Irwin in confidence as an officer of the court in order that it
> may be properly investigated. As use can see it is not evidence for
> any probate matter as a US Attorney and a MA DA claim. Perhaps you
> should discuss with any FED you choose the death of H. Pail Rico.
>
> Please never forget that I told your office last year that
> my wife’s Uncle William J. Kickham is a very bad bastard. I have no
> doubt he may have once known H. Paul Rico. It certainly explains why
> my brother in laws Billy bobby and Brian are so scared of him and more
> than willing to go against their sister. Why Canadians would stand
> with the Kickhams and against me is beyond my understanding.
>
> Please note that attached directly to this letter is what I
> consider the most important document of all. On October 15th 2002, the
> day before I proved Tax Fraud myself in Probate Court without saying a
> word and all the while being harassed by the Treasury Dept., a FBI
> agent who refused to identify herself told me they did not care about
> my stuff because they were too busy going to War with Iraq. Within one
> week I did inform my Clan’s Senator John Kerry immediately before he
> was reelected my Clan’s US Senator.
>
> One year later after I had embarrassed the Attorney General
> in Court Senator Kerry had someone try to call me and talk off the
> record. Of the dudes that also represent us only Bass. Lynch and
> Kennedy have at least answered me with double talk and I never even
> contacted Bass because I did not wish to send a non lawyer a wiretap
> tape and deliberately offend the Fourth Amendment Rights of others.
> Six months later the Secret Service came to my door one month after
> they left the Treasury Dept to go under the wing of the DHS to stop me
> from proving the Bank Fraud of the Brookline Savings Bank. I truly
> believe the only reason the FEDS quit messing with me is because they
> know that I have many incriminating wiretap tapes well hidden. The
> people that concern me now are mobsters and bad acting FEDS.
>
> With respect to my pending criminal trial I maintain the
> venue is correct because the tapes were found in Suffolk County.
> However matters involving the RCMP and so many federal employees,
> lawyers and politicians within two separate countries should be heard
> in a federal court. What say you Mr. Irwin? Clearly you know quite
> well many of the people mentioned within these documents. I can easily
> prove that you have been aware of my concerns for almost a year. What
> I want to know from you is why did you fail to even contact me to see
> if you could help. From my point of view you were hoping along with
> Argeo P. Cellucci, President Bush, Senator Kerry and many others that
> I would just melt away. Methinks you all have underestimated my
> tenacity and luck. Feel free to prove me wrong in court.
>
> Mr. Irwin,I have given up trying to talk sense to you. It
> is time to argue. If for no other reason, to protect your own
> interests may I suggest that you send some honest Canadian lawyer to
> Norfolk Probate and Superior Courts to check the Public Records and
> again to Dorchester District Oct 1st to speak to me about these
> matters. I will be the hairy guy in the Black Watch kilt. It was given
> to me to wear by one of the last surviving Forty-Eighth Highlanders
> from World War Two. He understands the reason that I found it
> necessary to become such a political animal. Clearly you do not have
> much interest in protecting a fellow Canadian’s rights and interests.
> I made it pretty clear to you in an email the other day that this
> letter would be coming and that I was looking into how to have you
> removed from your post. Please fell free to surprise me act in my
> interests as well as your own. Although I will question your motives I
> will be nonetheless grateful for the long delayed assistance of your
> office.
>
> Just in case you don’t know I am making a very diligent
> effort to inspire a confidence vote against the Martin Government on
> Oct 6th. As my friend Byron Prior states, it is quite likely the only
> day that Canadians may have a Democracy for a quite a while at least.
> I sincerely hope the Governor General asks the right questions and
> says the right words the day before.
>
> Mr. Irwin, if you choose to do nothing as you have in the
> past on Oct 3rd I will consider the Queen and all her servants to be
> adversaries of mine in litigation that will no doubt go on for years.
> For your benefit and the benefit of the Canadian Public I have
> included a copy of a CD that contains the scanned documents from all
> courts that I had been involved in actions in before I came home to
> run for Parliament. Please forward it to the Department of Justice for
> their review. As you can see the lawyers for Bell Canada were quite
> busy printing my stuff from the web for awhile but then fell strangely
> silent just before Sept 3rd. No doubt the lawyers like Robert Pozen
> working for MFS. and the new General Counsel for UBS. David Aufhauser
> are very nervous campers now that I have survived and their ethics may
> come under public scrutiny. Study the CD and you will see that this is
> just the tip of a very big and malevolent iceberg. Paul Martin and
> John Crosbie both should have known that no ship has proven to be
> unsinkable. Add my evidence to the present scandals and the newly
> elected Canadian minority government should have its days numbered by
> just three. Oct 5th should be a telling day for us all if the Queen
> acts ethically in her subject’s best interests. Governor General
> Adrienne Clarkson has lived high of the hog socializing at the
> taxpayer expense. It is high time that she did her job.
>
> The date and time of the delivery of this letter is no
> mistake. I must not allow my adversaries any time to stop me before I
> email this letter around the world in my best effort to expose the
> truth before the next federal election in the USA. I see no need to
> explain to you why. Laymen will understand this letter. I don’t care
> if a lawyer pretends not to. I have made it clear that I have no
> respect for your profession and I have gone about the business of
> proving it. I simply don’t even care about my grammar or spelling
> anymore. The gist and sincerity of this letter is far more important
> than the format or manners. All things considered I don’t give a shit.
> There is no one able to proof read this stuff today because my wife is
> in the hospital.
>
> I will do all that I have promised to the best of my
> ability because of the fact that too many very well paid civil
> servants in two countries are past too late to act within the scope of
> their employment. My family has already lost a great deal of our
> interests though no fault of our own. I am true to my word and it is
> my Clan that I answer to first for my actions. The task falls upon me
> to make all the smiling bastards pay for their illegal actions or
> inaction in order to willfully assist the criminals acting against my
> Clan.
>
> I will argue anyone I choose with the proper summons Ask
> Rob Moore or John Herron how hard I am to argue with. Rob Moore edited
> my smiling face from his website until after he won. Now that is
> funny. My ethical torture of Herron buddy the god damned Carpetbagging
> Yankee David Lutz was just to souuth my own savage breast. Rest
> assured I look forward to meeting you or anyone you send. At the very
> least you Mr. Irwin and your above named assistants now undeniable
> witnesses to the rampant corruption. I truly hope that in the future
> some Royal Commission calls you all back to Canada to testify for the
> benefit of all Canadians. That is your job.
>
> On the subway yesterday my wife overheard some pretty young
> lady lawyers discussing litigation with a colorful Pro Se character.
> She giggled as she continued to read her book. She knew they were
> speaking of me when she saw what T stop they got off at. She will
> recognize them if we ever see them again but I bet they won’t remember
> her. However they will have a very hard time forgetting me once I know
> their names. This little story reminds me of Andy Scott yapping too
> much on an airplane awhile back and then losing the job that Anne
> McLellan now has. Truth is stranger than fiction.
>
> Here hoping that October 6th is a great day for Canadian
> Democracy and that the ramifications of the day will have a positive
> effect on Democracy in the USA. People that cherish their Rights and
> Freedom deserve far better governments to serve them than the ones
> that now exist. I believe in Jimmy Carter’s words and his sincerity
> last July. It is too bad his help never told him about me. As for
> Barack Obama I must say if he is thought to be the future of a
> democratic Party then someone should check my work. It looks like I
> figured him out correctly a month before I went home to become a
> politician of a different sort.
>
> Nobody can say that I didn’t make it fun to listen to a
> political debate. Too bad the media owned by the elite didn’t let my
> message be heard. Lets see if I can do it alone byway of the internet.
> Guess who gets this letter in an email first? Their initials are APEX.
> They delayed their big meeting to the same day Paul Martin starts his
> circus. The fact that Margaret Bloodworth is one of the Co Chairs of
> the Symposium does not leave me much hope for the integrity of the
> organization of Bureaucrats. Wouldn’t it be a hoot if they invited me
> to speak or argue Ms. McLellan?
>
> At least I can still dream impossible dreams while I deal with
> the harsh realities of the moment. I have no doubt that APEX will live
> up to the letter of their mandate for their own benefit but they will
> likely do so at the expense of their stated principles. It seems the
> first order of business for the elite even in government service is to
> look after their own pocket books rather than the Public Trust placed
> in them. However with any luck at all many ordinary people will be
> contacting you, Mr. Irwin in an effort to view what I have sent you.
> Can you and your friends afford to ignore them all forever?
>
> I will leave you all to ponder what I will do next as you all
> argue with your own consciences and self-interests. You all know as
> well as I that there is no honour amongst thieves. I may have a fool
> for a client but I am the only person that I can trust to speak for
> me. If you trust a lawyer then you are more foolish than I. I have
> proved that fact beyond a shadow of a doubt and so has my friend Byron
> Prior. It is too bad that I do not respect you half as much as his
> little toe. To me the Title of Honourable is earned it should not be
> awarded so frequently to lawyers or politicians such as you Mr. Irwin
> or Byron adversary T. Alex Hickman. Why the Governor General would
> even wish to be in the same room with that bastard is beyond me and
> many others. Mr. Irwin you have already proven to me over a year ago
> that you are far from Honourable. Please prove me wrong or get off
> your ass and sue me. You are a lawyer aren’t ya? Lawyer defend thyself
> or act with integrity.
>
> Cya’ll in Court:)
>
> David R. Amos
> 153 Alvin Ave.
> Milton, MA. 02186
>
>
>
> CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
>
> On September 17th, 2004 I, David R. Amos with a witness served
> the enclosed material to the office of Ronald A. Irwin at the Canadian
> Consulate at 3 Copley Place in Boston, MA. 02108. If the Consulate is
> closed by the time I get there I will send it confirmed US Mail the
> same day. It depends on when my wife is released from the hospital
> today. It is too bad and so sad that I find it necessary to make such
> a service on Public Servants that are paid to defend the rights of
> Canadian’s in the USA. If anyone one thinks the simple truth is corny,
> shame on you. If anyone thinks I am joking please call me a liar in
> writing. I dare ya.
>
> David R. Amos
> 153 Alvin Ave.
> Milton, MA. 02186
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: webadmin@justice.gc.ca
> Cc: cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ; ottawacomments@state.gov ;
> McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ; vverma@cavalluzzo.com ; lrikleen@Bowditch.com
> ; admin@regdeeds.co.plymouth.ma.us ; webmaster@pcpfc.com ; Byron Prior
> ; John_Furlong@cbc.ca ; Bachrach, Barry A.
> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 3:59 PM
> Subject: I read what you wrote to Byron lets see how you do with me
>
>
> Attention
> Ginette Pilon Manager,
> Ministerial
> Correspondence
> Justice Canada
> Ministerial Secretariat
> 284 Wellington Street
> Ottawa, Ontario
> Canada K1A 0H8
> Telephone: (613) 957-2950
>
> Please don't try to pretend that you do not know who I am. For
> you information I did serve Mr. Byrne the letter at the bottom of this
> email with many witnesses and Byron did likewise and got signatures.
> On September the 13th Leutenant Governer of New Brunswick finally
> answered me with a letter he claims to have written September 3rd.
> However on September 2nd I got tired of waiting for everyone to act
> ethically so I sent the stuff to Adreinne Clarkson myself and let her
> know I was gonna sue the Queen providing the DHS did not to take me
> away to be tortured. I tracked the letter and she got it before the
> Acadian Leutenant Governor got up enough balls to respond.
>
> Do you know of anyone taking bets that I will live until
> October 1st? Maybe I will give the bookies recorded on the tapes a
> call and fix the game to hedge my bets. What say you? I have three
> bucks that I will bet you on the side that says I do. To be fair I
> have let some of the bastards in Beantown aware of the game to make it
> a more even bet for you. I will give it to the Canadian Consulate in
> Beantown if you are game to take the bet.
>
> I just called your office and hour or so ago and referred to
> your recent letter in answer to my friend Byron Prior's years of
> concerns. I also asked if you were a lawyer. The obvious question I
> wish to ask you is whether or not the RCMP are under federal
> juristion. When they dropped the ball and failed to investigate
> legitmate complaints going back over forty years, should not
> Parliamment ask for a Royal Commission to investigate Byron Prior's
> concerns just as Mr. Arar now has to investigate his matters? As for
> me I don't want one but I am willing to testify on Mr, Arar's or on
> Byron's behalf. I just want the truth to be known by all as I go about
> my business of torturing lawyers with the awful truth about themselves
> in order that they may fall on their own swords. I am having way more
> fun than Byron or Mr. Arar could dream of but I know that truth and
> justice would at least make them happy.
>
> I would think the issue of bringing Byron allegations into a
> Parliamentry investigation could be easily resolved by asking a man
> who was awarded the Order of Canada so show enough integrity to allow
> a simple blood test in order to prove Byron's allegations false. If
> Byron's allegations prove to be true by Hickman's denial of a blood
> test or the results of one then many heads should roll throughout
> Parliament and the RCMP for failing to uphold the Public Trust and the
> law.I now realize that it ain't important if you Ms. Pilon are a
> lawyer or not because your boss Irwin Cotler certainly is as are his
> bosses, Anne McLellan and Paul Martin. Apparently everybody was
> comfortable with the answer you gave to my friend. Lets see how they
> feel about your answer to me once I serve the man in Beantown that
> speaks for us all down here. If don't get an answer in writing by my
> wife's birthday I will send the Queen a summons for her to answer and
> i don't think many Yankees will care if i do. (excepting of course
> lawyers) Ms Pilon please feel free to correct me if I am wrong, but I
> beleive the following words are yours.
>
> In my response to your words to my friend I will deliver many
> documentsto another lawyer Ronald A. Irwin employed by Parliament to
> speak for Canadians in Boston. Some of them will iclude documents
> delivered to the Leutenant Governor Roberts. That man had Byron Prior
> sign a very interesting document years ago that should be brought into
> the public view because it concerns the actions of the MP Bill
> Matthews. Don't try to tell me that is not of federal concern.
>
> By the recent flood of letters sent to me dated on or about
> Setember 3rd, it appears that many Canadian politically appointed
> lawyers are rather surprised that I managed to escape the clutches of
> Attorney General Ashcroft and his cohorts within the DHS and stand in
> order on Sept 3rd and file many FBI tapes in the Public Record.
> Apparently Ronald A. Irwin doesn't give a damn about my Safety just
> like Anne McLellan and Wayne Easter didn't.I know that he is immune
> from prosecution in the USA but I can certainly complain of him in
> Canada. What say you Ms. Pilon?
>
> Whereas you Ms. Pilon seem to have all the answers, I must ask
> you a few questions. When I sue Her Majesty the Queen in the USA, do I
> served the summons upon Ronald A. Irwin? He does speak for her here in
> Boston correct? If not upon whom do I serve the documents? Furthermore
> can I call Ronald A. Irwin to testify in my defense or can he simply
> continue to ignore me? How do I as a Canadian citizen begin the
> process of seeing him removed from his office? As I write this I am
> trying hard to inspire the NDP to cause a confidence vote. October 6th
> should be an interesting day in Canada particularly if I am allowed to
> stand in Dorchester District Court on Octber 1st in the USA.
>
> Mere minutes ago I received by US Mail irrefuttable proof of
> former Prime Ministers Brian Mulroney and Jean Chretien malice towards
> my family and I. I had expected as much byway of an email notofication
> from Coldwell Bankers last week yesterday while I stood in court in
> Norfolk County to argue the very lawyer that began the actions on
> behalf of criminals in Plymouth County the Clerks offfice of Plymouth
> County mailed certified proof of the court's willingness to assist in
> fraud, larceny and perjury. The Massachuseets Registy of Motor
> Vehicles is threatening to take our drivers licenses for not willing
> to pay exise tax on vehicles stolen from our own yard by the State and
> this after I had notified all their lawyers of the fraud etc.
>
> Whereas many of my concerns involve Securities Fraud I believe
> that many Canadians should be made well aware of my concerns and of
> the sort of people that safeguard thei investments. If anyone has any
> questions perhaps they should seek the counsel of Robert C. Pozen of
> Boston a director of Bell Canada Inc. and an authority on Mutual Fund
> issues and a former legal counsel for the SEC. If you are wondering
> about the realestate sale I am referring to, perhaps you should
> confer with Francis Galvin of Massachusetts or John R. Buckley Jr. the
> Plymouth County Register of Deeds whom will seeks reelection shortly.
> I will be suing those bastards in federal court in the USA in short
> order along with Brian Mulroney and many lawyers within Cendant Corp.
> You all will be invited to participate in the prosecution of an
> necessary complaint either as witnesses or litigants against me. These
> bastards made the sale of our property seem to be legal five months
> after our property was stolen and destroyed without due process of law
> in order to protect the interests of many a crooked lawyer in Canada
> and the USA.
>
> Feel free to argue me but you really should wait until Ronald
> A. Irwin receives his correspondence from me. One last question do you
> think you can trust yyour yankee friends to protect your interests
> when I start bringing up the subject of murder? Think fast. I have
> already filed some of the evidence in a couple of courts. Everybody
> knows there is no honour amongst theives. Ask T. Alex Hickman or John
> Crosbie or dig up Joey Smallwood and watch him grinning from the
> grave. Alas we all knew Joey too well.
>
> Cya'll in Court
> David R.
> Amos
>
> Barry looks like I guessed right eh? You really should stand with me
> in court on Oct 1st and at least testify as to why the criminal
> complaint against me involves federal issues.I don't care what your
> partners think it is my ass that is on the line that is why I gave
> your some of the wiretap tapes perhaps you should make certain that
> someone I respect receives Three of them right away and simply send
> her the contents of my mail to Dane M. Shulman but save the envelope
> so that I can prove that I did not go his office on April fools day
> but merely employed the US Postal Service.
>
> Hey Byron would you like me to sue the RCMP in Newfoundland? The
> bastards gave me their final answer on September 3rd as well. I could
> call you and Ms. Pilon to testify.
>
> July 30, 2004
>
> Mr. Byron Prior
> 66 Readers Hill Crescent
> Conception Bay South, Newfoundland & Labrador
> A1W 5B4
>
> Dear Mr. Prior:
>
> On behalf of the Honourable Irwin Cotler, Minister of Justice and
> Attorney
> General of Canada, I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence involving
> allegations of sexual assault. The office of the Honourable Bill Graham,
> then Minister of Foreign Affairs, as well as former Member of Parliament
> Mr. Dennis Mills, also forwarded your concerns to Minister Cotler. I
> apologize
> for the delay in responding.
>
> Allegations of criminal offences should be directed to the police.
> While
> the Parliament of Canada is responsible for enacting criminal law, the
> administration of justice in a province, including police services and the
> prosecution of Criminal Code offences, is the responsiblility of the
> provincial governments. Neither Minister Cotler nor any official of the
> federal government can have any involvement in this matter.
>
> Thank you for expressing your concerns.
>
> Yours Sincerely,
>
> Ginette Pilon
> Manager
> Ministerial Correspondence
> Unit
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 8:05 PM
> Subject: Hey Mr . Irwin why not do the right thing and take your mail?
>
>
> It seems that CSIS is messing with my mail
>
> Sent by last Thursday by Canada Post to RCMP General Counsel Liliana Longo
> c/o Ast. Commissioner Gerry Lynch in NFLD. I have now called NFLD and
> gave Gerry the tracking number and told him if he wants to read his
> mail he should send someone to find it. afterall he is one of the
> second in Command of the RCMP and Longo is his lawyer.Canada Post
> won't say dick to me about it.
>
> To track and confirm delivery of your item, enter the Item number,
> Reference number, or Delivery Notification Card number in the
> corresponding field provided below, then click the Submit button.
>
> No records found for specified search criteria: 46227406901
>
> Sent US Mail Saturday in Beantown all it had to do was go about a half
> a mile to the Canadain Consulate.
>
> Obviously I informed them but the thing is they don't know who else I
> told. Kinda of a double check one by phone and one by email.
>
> Track & Confirm
>
> Shipment Details
>
> You entered 0302 1790 0001 6045 5717
>
> Your item was forwarded to a different address at 2:22 pm on September
> 21, 2004 in BOSTON, MA 02108. This was because of forwarding
> instructions or because the address or ZIP Code on the label was
> incorrect. Information, if available, is updated every evening. Please
> check again later.
>
> Here is what happened earlier:
> ACCEPTANCE, September 17, 2004, 10:30 pm, BOSTON, MA 02205
>
>
> Anyway it ain't no matter to me now Their mail is filed in court
> for the public to view. If they want to piss and moan about it they
> can argue me later in court.
>
> They are public servants they should read their god damned
> mail. The Postal Service has a little explaining to do anyway over the
> Attorney General Robb Quinan and his Mail Fraud anyway. I will just
> and this shit to it.
>
> I knew old man Ronald Irwin would duck and run but arguing Longo
> should be fun,
> What I did in Norfolk Probate Court today was way beyond fun it
> went way better than I dreamed it could. October 1st should prove to
> be quite a hoot after meeting Angie in court today. I wonder if Longo
> is a pretty as she is. She looks good in her picture anyway I am
> certain that she is a damn sight smarter than Angie. Angie is so
> stupid I almost feel ashamed for making her show me her ass. (Not
> really I am an ass man)
>
> Now it appears all the Canadian Boobs have shown me their ass a
> well. Time to talk to the right Yankees just before the November
> Election and then head out as planned. i finally got the tape from the
> New Brunswick Police Commission
> and I will send a copy of it your way someday Byron. I made sure I
> mentioned you several times and showed them the documents but I
> didn't speak of what it was about but everybody will know they got
> something really kinda big. I did to protect ya buddy. I also
> mentioned Barry once. I hope Barry called you today. I know the FEDS
> are likely listening and reading our emails so I recorded it here to
> protect the both of you and Collen Rowley as well. I cannot afford the
> time to wait for her to retire she is more valuable to me as an
> honest lawyer within the FBI before the Yankee federal election, not
> afterwards.
>
> I also hear Jean and Joyse on the tape so it should protect their
> butts as well. I will order a copy of the Probate Court tape as soon
> as we can afford it. But it will likely be edited anyway.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Byron Prior
> To: David Amos
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 9:44 PM
> Subject: Re: Hey Mr . Irwin why not do the right thing and take your mail?
>
> Good stuff David, keep the pot boiling & I'll be adding to it very
> soon. They want a circus that's what they're about to get.
> Byron
>
> From: Bachrach, Barry A.
> To: 'David Amos'
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 9:13 PM
> Subject: RE: Hey Mr . Irwin why not do the right thing and take your mail?
>
> how did court go.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: Bachrach, Barry A.
> Cc: Byron Prior
> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 8:06 AM
> Subject: Re: Hey Mr . Irwin why not do the right thing and take your mail?
>
> It would take too long to explain it in an email. But basically no
> judge would meet me so they tried to pull a fast one on us. While we
> were waiting in courtroom three where the tne hearing was posted to be
> heard. Judge Langlois the bastard that closed Aunt Elaine's estate
> without Jeans knowledge or assent sided with Angie and appparently
> ordered the Big House sold. When we finally were told by the Clerk
> Silveria Odonez's clerj and another person we had sued that it was
> being held in courtroom 5 there was none there. When that clerk
> finally appeared after 2pm He laughed and told us the matter was over.
> I immediately went balistic and within minutes he stopped us in the
> hall and said that Judge Langlois was willing to hear the matter
> again. So he ordered Angie to come back to court and we all had quite
> a hoedown with six guards protecting Angie from mean old me. In the
> end Judge Langlois Struck my appearance without any Motion to Strike
> and order all documents we had filed in the recourded destroyed. Even
> the Motion to Dismiss that you saw marked the other day and has yet to
> be heard and all of the documents that Jean had filed and signed in
> her own hand. However I managed to knock Angie back to square one even
> though the Judge accepted her lie claiming that she had served the
> petition to partition, upon Jean and you apparently there is a
> mortgage on the house that we did not know about and the Bank was not
> served. Looks like someone must have forged Jean's signature again.
>
> How you can help Byron and I is easy. Talk your partner into
> acting ethically and you sue Angie because she has used your name in
> her commission of perjury in an illegal action to help criminals. Your
> partner has assisted them as well. I made her well aware of a
> fraudulent Title V inspection and much more and she did nothing. She
> should read the Rules of Professional Conduct at least Rule 8.3
>
> Once I nail Angie in Dorchester District Court in a jury trial
> they all go down like dominoes anyway and I will catch your partner in
> the net.
>
> The sooner that I start a Circus and break the surface scum on
> corruption in Angie's Criminal Complaint against me the sooner we can
> help Byron in far more serious and politically important matters in
> USA and Canada.
>
> At least you are and imortant witness as to the events in the
> Probate Courts and Angie's false allegations just. If you or your
> partner choose to do nothing, I will get the bastards anyway as long
> as you tell the truth in court in a jury trial. My biggest fear today
> is that the DA will drop the charges so I keep making myself appear to
> be wild and crazy without breaking any rule or law to that the will
> continue to prosecute me in an effort to stop me. Then I will turn the
> worm with the right to a swift trial with a jury. and call you to
> testify.
>
> None of this would have been necessary if your partner had acted
> according to the mandate of ELM or whatever they call themselves. I
> will sue her and them but not you or your law firm as a favour to you.
>
> How can you help? Sue Angie today because she has offended you.
> You have the large law firm behind you all she has now is a PO
> Box plus she is fun to argue and not hard to look at. Trust me it
> would be a fun complaint. If nothing else Barry do it for yourself,
> The argument with Angie about what she say she did with you would make
> you feel good about being a lawyer.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Byron Prior
> To: David Amos
> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 1:30 PM
> Subject: Re: Hey Mr . Irwin why not do the right thing and take your mail?
>
>
> David, go for it.
> Byron
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: info@isakson.net
> Cc: info@delamar.us ; dmajette@majetteforcongress.org ;
> buckley@buckleyforsenate.org ; metroplex86@speedfactory.net ;
> lynne@votecobb.org ; motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com ;
> alltrue@nl.rogers.com ; BushCheney04@GeorgeWBush.com ;
> info@johnkerry.com ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca ; dpm@pm.gc.ca ;
> Easter.W@parl.gc.ca ; kcarmichael@bloomberg.net ;
> chuckmorse@morseforcongress.com ; davies.carl@nbpub.com ;
> jeff.mockler@gnb.ca ; Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca ; martine.turcotte@bell.ca
> ; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ; Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca ;
> info@kucinich.us ; rosent@math.toronto.edu ; mjyannone@aol.com
> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 1:08 PM
> Subject: This is what spooked the Bastards
>
> From: "Byron Prior"
> To: "moto maniac"
> Subject: Re: Fw: You are Under Attck FR; Byron, FROM BYRON
> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 23:50:08 -0230
>
>
> David, this one I like very much,good man.
> Byron
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: moto maniac
> To: justice@mail.gov.nl.ca
> Cc: IntegrityBC@yahoogroups.com ; John Carten ; Lisa ; moto maniac ;
> John Dempsey ; kevinannett@yahoo.ca ; kuntz@telus.net ;
> eisbrennerlaw@yahoo.com ; alltrue@nl.rogers.com ; bushman_57@msn.com
> Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2004 8:35 PM
> Subject: Re: Fw: You are Under Attck FR; Byron, FROM BYRON
>
> September 26th, 2004
>
> Tom Marshall Minister of Justice and Attorney General
> 4th Flr., East Block, Confederation Building
> Box 8700
> St. John's, NL A1B 4J6
> Telephone: (709) 729-5942
> Facsimile: (709) 729-2129
>
> Hey Tom
>
> I heard through the grapevine that Constable John Roche wants
> to hassle my friend Byron Prior over some very truthful flyers he
> handed out. Don’t you think you should talk to me first about the
> material of mine that Lieutenant Governor Roberts sent you? I asked
> him to send to his boss Adrienne Clarkson but idiot picked you
> instead. So i sent her the stuff myself before the Leutenant Governor
> in New Brunswick tried to act honest. I do not have to send you hard
> copy you already have it. Tell me what will you do with the copy of
> wiretap tape numbered 139?
>
> You should know as well as I that problems with the RCMP fall
> under Federal Jurisdiction. I know John Crosbie and diddler Hickman
> know it but trust that I will look forward to arguing with you about
> it. Don’t you think you should act ethically and call me quickly
> before I bring up your name in court on October 1st as being in
> cahoots with the FBI in Boston? I called Gerry Lynch's office and left
> him my number. Perhaps you should call Bolduc Clement of the Police
> Commission in Fredericton and ask for a copy of the tape of the
> meeting I had with him in August if you don't wish to speak to me.
> Byron and Jim Case are mentioned on the tape and I already have my
> copy. I will be filing it in the Public Record down in Boston. If I do
> not hear from you by October 1st I will consider you to be a
> conspirator against me. Say hey to Jim Case and Danny Williams for me
> will ya?
>
> Cya’ll in Court:)
>
> David R. Amos
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 14:46:58 -0400
> Subject: Attn Minister Judy Foote My mail to the RCMP in Newfoundland
> in 2004 never got there yet and I just called your office for the last
> time
> To: "judy.foote.a1" <judy.foote.a1@parl.gc.ca>, minister@pwgsc.gc.ca,
> mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson" <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "ralph.goodale.a1" <ralph.goodale.a1@parl.gc.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
> <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "john.warr"
> <john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "roger.l.brown"
> <roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Dale.Morgan"
> <Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "david.hansen"
> <david.hansen@justice.gc.ca>, "jill.chisholm"
> <jill.chisholm@justice.gc.ca>, "bill.pentney"
> <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, judy.foote@parl.gc.ca
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 15:03:57 -0400
> Subject: YO Minister Jean-Yves Duclos here is some info for your
> lawyers to review
> To: jeanyves.duclos@hrsdc-rhdcc.gc.ca, Jean-Yves.Duclos@parl.gc.ca,
> Jean-Yves.Duclos.c1@parl.gc.ca, "judy.foote.a1"
> <judy.foote.a1@parl.gc.ca>, media@hrsdc-rhdcc.gc.ca,
> Louise.Levonian@hrsdc-rhdcc.gc.ca, pierre.poilievre.a1@parl.gc.ca,
> "Andrew.Treusch" <Andrew.Treusch@cra-arc.gc.ca>, "Diane.Lebouthillier"
> <Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc.ca>, "Diane.Lebouthillier"
> <Diane.Lebouthillier@parl.gc.ca>, roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Wayne.Gallant" <Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, gopublic
> <gopublic@cbc.ca>, investigations <investigations@cbc.ca>,
> steven.blaney.a1@parl.gc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, premier
> <premier@gnb.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>,
> "Gerald.Butts" <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, nmoore@bellmedia.ca,
> "dan. bussieres" <dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>, media@tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca,
> minister@pwgsc.gc.ca, "john.warr" <john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, oldmaison
> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "jake.stewart" <jake.stewart@gnb.ca>,
> "hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "Katherine.dEntremont"
> <Katherine.dEntremont@gnb.ca>, "Russell.George"
> <Russell.George@tigta.treas.gov>, "inspector.general"
> <inspector.general@usdoj.gov>, "Ken.Drexler" <Ken.Drexler@ci.irs.gov>,
> "Sherra.Profit" <Sherra.Profit@taxpayersrights.gc.ca>, mcu
> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould.a1"
> <Jody.Wilson-Raybould.a1@parl.gc.ca>, "bill.pentney"
> <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>,
> "david.hansen" <david.hansen@justice.gc.ca>, "jill.chisholm"
> <jill.chisholm@justice.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca,
> leader <leader@greenparty.ca>, ElenaChurikova@ifac.org
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:34:47 -0400
> Subject: Attn Diane.Lebouthillier I just called Commissioner Andrew
> Treusch and his Deputy John Ossowski and they would not come to the
> phone.
> To: "Andrew.Treusch" <Andrew.Treusch@cra-arc.gc.ca>,
> John.Ossowski@cra-arc.gc.ca, "Diane.Lebouthillier"
> <Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc.ca>, "Diane.Lebouthillier.a1"
> <Diane.Lebouthillier.a1@parl.gc.ca>, "rona.ambrose.A1"
> <rona.ambrose.A1@parl.gc.ca>, gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>,
> cbcnewsvancouver <cbcnewsvancouver@cbc.ca>, cbcinvestigates
> <cbcinvestigates@cbc.ca>, investigations <investigations@cbc.ca>,
> "Russell.George" <Russell.George@tigta.treas.gov>, "inspector.general"
> <inspector.general@usdoj.gov>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, MulcaT
> <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
> ElenaChurikova <ElenaChurikova@ifac.org>, "elizabeth.may"
> <elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca>
>
> Whereas I am not allowed to file with CRA I will file my Tax Return in
> Federal Court
>
> Who are your CRA people to call a liar today as I try to my tax return?
>
> On one document hereto attached is in YOUR records and that was once
> my SIN number CORRECT?
>
> On the other document which a Yankee form 211 is my American Social
> Security Number You people do business across borders because of FATCA
> so it follows you have known exactly who I am for years.
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Investigations Investigations <investigations@cbc.ca>
> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 13:34:50 -0700
> Subject: Thank you for your email Re: Attn Diane.Lebouthillier I just
> called Commissioner Andrew Treusch and his Deputy John Ossowski and
> they would not come to the phone.
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you for sending your story idea to the CBC's Investigative Unit.
> We appreciate your interest and will read your suggestions. If we
> move forward with your idea we will be in touch.
>
> Thanks again for contacting us.
>
> The investigative team.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Elizabeth.May@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 20:34:53 +0000
> Subject: Thank you for contacting the Office of Elizabeth May, O.C., M.P
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you for contacting me. This response is to assure you that your
> message has been received. I welcome and appreciate receiving comments
> and questions from constituents.
>
> I receive a much larger volume of correspondence (postal and email)
> than the average MP. My office replied to over 400,000 pieces of
> correspondence 2014. All emails are reviewed on a regular basis,
> however due to the high volume of emails my office receives, I may not
> be able to respond personally to each one.
>
> My constituents in Saanich-Gulf Islands are my highest priority. If
> you are a constituent, please email
> elizabeth.may.c1a@parl.gc.ca<mailto:elizabeth.may.c1a@parl.gc.ca>. To
> help me serve you better, please ensure that your email includes your
> full name and street address with your postal code.
>
> For meeting requests and invitations, please email
> requests@greenparty.ca<mailto:requests@greenparty.ca>.
>
> Thank you once again for contacting me.
>
> Elizabeth May, O.C., M.P.
> Member of Parliament for Saanich-Gulf Islands
> Leader of the Green Party of Canada
>
> --
>
> Je vous remercie d'avoir communiqué avec moi. La présente réponse vous
> confirme que votre message a été reçu. Les questions et les
> commentaires des électeurs sont toujours les bienvenus.
>
> Je reçois une correspondance (postale et électronique) beaucoup plus
> abondante que le député type. Mon bureau a répondu à plus de 400 000
> lettres en 2014. Tous les messages électroniques sont lus
> régulièrement, mais, en raison de l'abondance des courriels reçus à
> mon bureau, il se peut que je ne sois pas en mesure de répondre
> personnellement à chacun d'entre eux.
>
> Mes électeurs de Saanich-Gulf Islands passent en premier. Si vous êtes
> un électeur, veuillez écrire à
> elizabeth.may.c1a@parl.gc.ca<mailto:elizabeth.may.c1a@parl.gc.ca>.
> Pour m'aider à mieux vous servir, veillez à ce que votre courriel
> comporte votre nom complet, votre adresse municipale et votre code
> postal.
>
> Pour les demandes de rencontre et les invitations, veuillez écrire à
> requests@greenparty.ca<mailto:requests@greenparty.ca>.
>
> Je vous remercie encore d'avoir communiqué avec moi.
>
> Elizabeth May, O.C.
> Députée de Saanich-Gulf Islands
> Chef du Parti vert du Canada
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Info <info@greenparty.ca>
> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 20:34:55 +0000
> Subject: Re: Attn Diane.Lebouthillier I just called Commissioner
> Andrew Treusch and his Deputy John Ossowski and they would not come to
> the phone.
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> -- Please reply above this line --
>
>
> _(Français à suivre)_
>
> Thank you for contacting the Green Party of Canada. Due to the high
> volume of email, we cannot guarantee that all inquiries will be
> answered. We will do our best to respond to inquiries as staffing and
> resources permit.
>
> In the meantime, you may find the answer you're looking for in Vision
> Green [1], which lays out a plan to move Canada forward and to defend
> the shared values and principles that built the country we love.
>
> Our economic plan [2] invests in people and creates good jobs. We
> will invest in infrastructure, education, and health care to
> support strong communities [3]. Our proposed democratic reforms [4]
> will make our politicians more accountable, our Parliament more
> accessible, and our voting system more representative. Our plan
> takes bold climate action [5], by embracing the solutions that we
> already know work, encouraging research into those we have yet to
> discover, and increasing the taxes paid by corporate polluters.
>
> Green Members of Parliament, united by this vision for Canada, will
> work on behalf of you, your family, and your community. If you would
> like to help us grow, I would encourage you to visit our website [6],
> where you sign up to volunteer [7] or make a donation [8].
>
> Thank you again for your interest in the Green Party, and have a great
> day!
>
> ---
>
> Nous vous remercions d’avoir contacté le Parti vert du Canada. En
> raison de la grande quantité de courriels, nous ne pouvons garantir
> que toutes les demandes seront traitées. Nous ferons notre possible
> pour répondre à toutes les demandes selon le nombre d’employés et
> les ressources dont nous disposons.
>
> Entre temps, vous pouvez trouver la réponse à votre question en
> consultant la publication Vision verte [9], un document qui définit
> notre plan d’action pour faire avancer le Canada et pour défendre
> les valeurs et les principes pour construire le pays que nous aimons.
>
> Notre plan d’action économique [10] investit dans les gens et crée
> de bons emplois. Nous investirons dans les infrastructures, en
> éducation et dans les soins de santé pour soutenir des
> collectivités fortes [11]. Notre proposition quant à une réforme
> démocratique [12] rendra nos politiciens plus responsables, notre
> Parlement plus accessible et notre système électoral plus
> représentatif. Notre plan d’action prend des mesures vigoureuses
> sur le réchauffement climatique [13] en adoptant les solutions qui,
> selon nos connaissances, fonctionnent, en encourageant la recherche
> dans des secteurs à découvrir et en augmentant les taxes et les
> impôts payés par les entreprises pollueuses.
>
> Les députés verts à la Chambre des communes, unis par cette vision
> pour le Canada, travailleront en votre nom, celui de votre famille et
> de votre collectivité. Si vous voulez nous aider à poursuivre notre
> avancée, nous vous encourageons à consulter notre site web [14] où
> vous pouvez donner votre nom comme bénévole [15] ou faire un don
> [16].
>
> Merci encore une fois de démontrer votre intérêt envers le Parti
> vert.
>
> info@greenparty.ca | info@partivert.ca
> 613-562-4916
> Green Party of Canada [17] | Parti vert du Canada [18]
> Facebook [19] | Twitter [20]
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Ministre / Minister (SPAC/PSPC)"
> <TPSGC.Ministre-Minister.PWGSC@tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca>
> Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 14:15:14 -0400
> Subject: Accusé réception / Acknowledgement
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Le présent message accuse réception de votre courriel au ministre des
> Services publics et de l’Approvisionnement. Soyez assuré(e) que nous y
> accorderons toute l’attention voulue.
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
>
>
> This message is to acknowledge receipt of your email to the Minister
> of the Public Services and Procurement. Please be assured it will be
> given every consideration.
>
No comments:
Post a Comment