Error Icon

Message blocked

Your message to Michael.Gorman@cbc.ca has been blocked. See technical details below for more information.

This link will take you to a third-party site

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Bergen, Candice - M.P." <candice.bergen@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 14:50:29 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: On April 16, 2019 CBC reported Roger Brown
RCMP's former commanding officer was named Fredericton's next police
chief to replace Leanne Fitch N'esy Pas???
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

On behalf of the Hon. Candice Bergen, thank you for contacting the
Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition.

Ms. Bergen greatly values feedback and input from Canadians. We read
and review every incoming e-mail. Please note that this account
receives a high volume of e-mails. We reply to e-mails as quickly as
possible.

If you are a constituent of Ms. Bergen’s in Portage-Lisgar with an
urgent matter please provide complete contact information. Not
identifying yourself as a constituent could result in a delayed
response.

Once again, thank you for writing.

Sincerely,

Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Au nom de l’hon. Candice Bergen, nous vous remercions de communiquer
avec le Bureau de la cheffe de l’Opposition officielle.

Mme Bergen accorde une grande importance aux commentaires des
Canadiens. Nous lisons et étudions tous les courriels entrants.
Veuillez noter que ce compte reçoit beaucoup de courriels. Nous y
répondons le plus rapidement possible.

Si vous faites partie de l’électorat de Mme Bergen dans la
circonscription de Portage-Lisgar et que votre affaire est urgente,
veuillez fournir vos coordonnées complètes. Si vous ne le faites pas,
cela pourrait retarder la réponse.

Nous vous remercions une fois encore d’avoir pris le temps d’écrire.

Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées,

Bureau de la cheffe de l’Opposition officielle

---------- Original message ----------
From: Info <Info@gg.ca>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 14:48:08 +0000
Subject: OSGG General Inquiries / Demande de renseignements généraux au BSGG
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for writing to the Office of the Secretary to the Governor
General. We appreciate hearing your views and suggestions. Responses
to specific inquiries can be expected within three weeks. Please note
that general comments and opinions may not receive a response.

*****

Nous vous remercions d'avoir écrit au Bureau du secrétaire du
gouverneur général. Nous aimons prendre connaissance de vos points de
vue et de vos suggestions. Il faut allouer trois semaines pour
recevoir une réponse à une demande précise. Veuillez noter que nous ne
donnons pas nécessairement suite aux opinions et aux commentaires
généraux.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message may contain confidential or privileged
information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are
not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or
copy this email. Please notify the sender immediately if you have
received this email by mistake and delete it from your system.

AVIS IMPORTANT : Le présent courriel peut contenir des renseignements
confidentiels et est strictement réservé à l’usage de la personne à
qui il est destiné. Si vous n’êtes pas la personne visée, vous ne
devez pas diffuser, distribuer ou copier ce courriel. Merci de nous en
aviser immédiatement et de supprimer ce courriel s’il vous a été
envoyé par erreur.

---------- Original message ----------

From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 11:46:07 -0300

Subject: On April 16, 2019 CBC reported Roger Brown RCMP's former

commanding officer was named Fredericton's next police chief to

replace Leanne Fitch N'esy Pas???

To: "martin.gaudet" <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>,

Andrew.Blackadar@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino"
<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
"Bill.Hogan" <Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>,
nsinvestigators <nsinvestigators@gmail.com>, paulpalango
<paulpalango@protonmail.com>, andrew <andrew@frankmagazine.ca>, mcu
<mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Chrystia.Freeland"
<Chrystia.Freeland@parl.gc.ca>, signalhfx@gmail.com,
Roger.Burrill@masscasualtycommission.ca, nasha@nmbarristers.com,
josh@chesterlaw.ca, RPineo@pattersonlaw.ca,
smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca, "Michelle.Boutin"
<Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, lbordeleau@perlaw.ca, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>,
"Roger.Brown" <Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, "Ian.Shugart"
<Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, info@masscasualtycommission.ca, pm
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, Viva
Frei <david@vivafrei.com>, "drea.humphrey"
<drea.humphrey@rebelnews.com>, info@easternshorecooperator.ca,
novashootingcenter@gmail.com, jcarpay <jcarpay@jccf.ca>, info
<info@gg.ca>, info@aboriginallegal.ca, hrgeneral@aboriginallegal.ca,
"michael.macdonald" <michael.macdonald@thecanadianpress.com>,
"Michael.Gorman" <Michael.Gorman@cbc.ca>,
office.journalism@ryerson.ca, patti.sonntag@concordia.ca,
iij@concordia.ca, "ian.fahie" <ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Nathalie.Drouin" <Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>, "Anita.Anand"
<Anita.Anand@parl.gc.ca>, "Candice.Bergen"
<Candice.Bergen@parl.gc.ca>, dbeers@thetyee.ca, abennett@thetyee.ca,
pwillcocks@thetyee.ca, "fin.minfinance-financemin.fin"
<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, sheilagunnreid
<sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
haley.ryan@cbc.ca, "bruce.fitch" <bruce.fitch@gnb.ca>, "greg.byrne"
<greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, "Mike.Comeau" <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>,
"richard.williams" <richard.williams@gnb.ca>, "Holland, Mike (LEG)"
<mike.holland@gnb.ca>, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>,
"warren.mcbeath" <warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, oldmaison
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, David.Coon@gnb.ca, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
Nicholas.Dorrington@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, fcampbell@herald.ca

https://secure1.nbed.nb.ca › News › Documents
PDF

"As of June 2020 Leanne Fitch was appointed to the position of Vice
Chair of the RCMP Management ... Leanne served seven years as Chief of
Police for the Fredericton Police"

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/07/independent-panel-slap-in-face-says.html

Thursday, 23 July 2020

Independent panel 'a slap in the face,' says daughter of N.S. shooting victim

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/new-brunswick-sirt-policing-oversight-1.5660266

N.S. evaluating N.B. proposal to collaborate on serious incident response team
Director of Nova Scotia SIRT says momentum driven by fatal police
shootings of Chantel Moore, Rodney Levi

Karissa Donkin · CBC News · Posted: Jul 24, 2020 7:30 AM AT

---------- Original message ----------
From: El Jones <El.Jones@msvu.ca>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 22:13:35 +0000
Subject: Re: RE The "Strike back: Demand an inquiry Event." Methinks
it interesting that Martha Paynter is supported by the Pierre Elliott
Trudeau Foundation N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Trudeau fellowships are, I believe, awarded to the top candidates who
apply for PhD funding to SSHRC each year (which most institutions make
mandatory.) I say that just to say it is a research award more than a
political affiliation, although certainly raises questions whether
it’s ever appropriate to name research fellowships after political
figures. And they def try to network with the researchers etc.

Sent from my iPhone

---------- Original message ----------
From: Timothy Bousquet <tim@halifaxexaminer.ca>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 19:27:40 -0300
Subject: Re: 3579
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Hello, I’m taking a much-needed vacation and will not be responding to
email until August 4. If this is urgent Halifax Examiner business,
please email zane@halifaxexaminer.ca.

Thanks,

Tim Bousquet
Editor
Halifax Examiner

On Jul 28, 2020, at 6:48 PM, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:

> BTW I inserted a lot more info in this blog
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/07/independent-panel-slap-in-face-says.html
>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioT6vj0zA_Q&t=3024s

Citizens Rise Against Corruption in Trudeau Government

12,800 views

•Streamed live 18 hours ago

Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson

37.7K subscribers

Peter Mac Isaac on Twitter: "Under Trudeau the country is ...

twitter.com › PeterRMacIsaac › status

Jun 27, 2020 - Peter Mac Isaac · @PeterRMacIsaac. CEO at Bull Run Productions /outdoorsman/ film and photography/ entrepreneur/ politics/ fisherman and ...

https://www.bullrun.ca/

Bedford NS Canada

B4A 3T7

prmi@eastlink.ca

phone 902-489-9162

fax 902-406-9392

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies

‏ @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
Methinks legions of cops, lawyers, politicians and "Ray Oliver" a certain RCMP shill in particular are very well aware of how much I could say about this topic but sometimes less is more N'esy Pas?

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/07/independent-panel-slap-in-face-says.html

#nbpoli #cdnpoli

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/new-brunswick-sirt-policing-oversight-1.5660266

N.S. evaluating N.B. proposal to collaborate on serious incident response team

Director of Nova Scotia SIRT says momentum driven by fatal police shootings of Chantel Moore, Rodney Levi

Karissa Donkin · CBC News · Posted: Jul 24, 2020 7:30 AM AT

Nova Scotia's deputy minister is reviewing a proposal from New Brunswick to collaborate on a serious incident response team. (Shutterstock)

For years, New Brunswick has relied on agencies outside its borders to come in and investigate when there's a serious incident involving police.

But a new proposal to Nova Scotia's Serious Incident Response Team, or SIRT, could provide the province with its own version of an independent police watchdog.

Nova Scotia SIRT director Felix Cacchione said he sent New Brunswick's proposal to Nova Scotia's deputy minister of justice and is awaiting a meeting with the minister.

The idea of New Brunswick collaborating with at least one other Atlantic province on a serious incident response team isn't new.

But it's gained momentum after the fatal police shootings of two Indigenous people only days apart in June, which also prompted calls for a public inquiry into systemic racism.

Chief says pressure on Higgs for inquiry into justice system won't let up

Chantel Moore, 26, was shot and killed by an officer who was carrying out a wellness check on the Nuu-chah-nulth woman of Tla-o-qui-aht First Nation in B.C.

Days later, a Sunny Corner RCMP officer shot and killed 48-year-old Rodney Levi from Metepenagiag First Nation.

Chantel Moore, 26, and Rodney Levi, 48, were shot and killed by police in New Brunswick eight days apart. CBC has permission from Moore's family to use the photos included in this story. (CBC)

"After that, there seemed to be a renewed conversation," Cacchione said.

With half of Nova Scotia SIRT's investigators focused on investigating incidents related to the April mass shootings, the shooting deaths of Moore and Levi are being investigated by the Quebec Bureau des Enquêtes Indépendantes (BEI).

But relying on other agencies to help is not feasible in the future, according to Cacchione.

"We definitely do not have the manpower to cover the province of New Brunswick," he said.

Former government was trying to get 'consensus' on SIRT

Back in 2017, momentum seemed to be building on creating an Atlantic SIRT.

All four provinces were involved in discussions that were backed by the four premiers at the time, according to documents CBC News obtained through access to information.

So why hasn't it happened?

Denis Landry, the Liberal MLA for Bathurst East-Nepisiguit-Saint-Isidore and the minister of public safety in the previous government, said establishing such a unit would require changes to legislation, notably the Police Act.

Former New Brunswick minister of public safety, Denis Landry, said the government was trying to reach consensus with a number of organizations on the idea of a serious incident response team. (Ed Hunter/CBC)

To do that, his government was trying to obtain consensus from a number of organizations, including municipalities and police unions.

"I think there were little disagreements here and there and this is what we were working on to make or to obtain a consensus between all of those different organizations," Landry said.

He wouldn't elaborate on which stakeholder was resistant to the idea.

Without an agreement for an Atlantic SIRT, Newfoundland and Labrador went ahead and formed its own investigative team, while Prince Edward Island has a memorandum of understanding that would have Nova Scotia SIRT investigate when needed.

"Given the demands on the Nova Scotia team and their work with the other Atlantic provinces we didn't want to risk a lack of available resources should a response be required in this province," Lesley Clarke, a spokesperson for Newfoundland and Labrador's Department of Justice, wrote in an emailed statement.

"We will never close the door on collaboration with other Atlantic provinces, but we are confident our stand-alone model was the right choice for right now."

Support from police chiefs

The resistance doesn't appear to be coming from municipal police agencies.

CBC News did an informal survey of New Brunswick police forces this week to see if they would support some kind of SIRT in the province. The New Brunswick RCMP referred the question to the provincial Department of Public Safety, but all the municipal police chiefs who answered the survey said they support the idea.

"The [New Brunswick Association of Chiefs of Police] and myself have long supported the concept of an independent investigative body to investigate police. Our support for such a concept remains unchanged," Kennebecasis Regional Police Force Chief Wayne Gallant wrote in an email.

Wayne Gallant, chief of the Kennebecasis Regional Police Force, supports the idea of a SIRT in New Brunswick. (Matthew Bingley/CBC)

"Whether it is a [New Brunswick] only or Atlantic wide, or some other structural concept, the fact remains such a body is needed in [New Brunswick] and has been for a long time."

Estimated to use SIRT 21 times per year

There's also a clear need for an independent body, given the number of incidents in New Brunswick, according to Ron MacDonald, the former director of Nova Scotia SIRT.

"I believe that the numbers do justify it, especially either for New Brunswick to have their own team or a joint type of team that would permit this type of work to be done on a moment's notice," said MacDonald, who is now chief civilian director of the Independent Investigations Office of British Columbia.

Ron MacDonald, the former director of Nova Scotia SIRT, says New Brunswick can't keep relying on other provinces to investigate serious incidents involving police. (Nic Amaya/CBC)

Police chiefs in New Brunswick were asked in 2017 to try to estimate how often they'd use a SIRT if the province had one. It assumed that New Brunswick would use the same criteria as Nova Scotia SIRT, which has a mandate to investigate "all matters that involve death, serious injury, sexual assault and domestic violence or other matters of significant public interest" arising from the actions of a police officer.'

The police chiefs estimated it could be needed 21 times per year, emails show.

CBC's Deadly Force database, which tracks fatalities where police have used force, shows seven people have been killed by police in New Brunswick between 2010 and the end of June 2020.

CBC's Deadly Force database looks at role of race, mental health in deaths

That means there are many serious incidents that don't rise to the level of someone losing their life and which aren't often known publicly.

"There can be significant public issues with matters that fall short of shooting cases and when you're only picking and choosing certain ones, that does leave the potential for the public to have concerns about other cases that aren't being investigated by an independent body," MacDonald said.

Details of proposed partnership unclear

It's not clear exactly how a New Brunswick-Nova Scotia SIRT partnership would work and whether it means New Brunswick would have its own civilian director or satellite office.

As it stands, sending investigators from another province, without having extra resources or separate legislation, comes with problems, beyond the fact that other provinces may not have the resources to send.

Every time an investigator from Nova Scotia SIRT comes to New Brunswick, they need to be made a peace officer in order to do their work, according to Cacchione.

Nova Scotia SIRT doesn't have the manpower to support New Brunswick without extra resources, according its director, Felix Cacchione. (SIRT)

When they work in New Brunswick, they need the Crown to approve laying criminal charges, an added layer that isn't present in Nova Scotia, where SIRT has the power to lay charges.

It also means a delay in getting investigators on scene, which means a delay in collecting evidence and interviewing witnesses.

2019 review recommended NB develop a SIRT

That came up in a 2019 government-ordered review of the New Brunswick Police Commission, which investigates citizen complaints of officer conduct and other complaints related to policing in the province.

"SIRT investigators must have scenes secured and delays in attending a scene can impact the investigation negatively or unreasonably inconvenience the public," wrote Alphonse MacNeil, who authored the review.

MacNeil recommended the government consider developing "a SIRT entity" in New Brunswick and suggested a possible model: a two-investigator team that would work in New Brunswick under the direction of Nova Scotia's SIRT director.

It's not clear if that's the model New Brunswick prefers. No one from the Department of Public Safety was made available for an interview for this story, nor was anyone from Nova Scotia's Department of Justice.

"Minister [Carl] Urquhart has recently mentioned an interest in having a permanent independent agency to investigate police use of force, and has spoken about various options, including a regional agency serving more than one province," New Brunswick Department of Public Safety spokesperson Coreen Enos wrote in an emailed statement.

"Our discussions with Nova Scotia officials are part of our exploration of various models."

About the Author

Karissa Donkin

Karissa Donkin is a journalist in CBC's Atlantic investigative unit. Do you have a story you want us to investigate? Send your tips to NBInvestigates@CBC.ca.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

10 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.

David Amos
Methinks legions of cops, lawyers, politicians and a certain RCMP shill in particular are well aware of how much I could say about this topic but sometimes less is more N'esy Pas?

https://q107.com/news/7219290/n-s-shooting-feminist-analysis/

Advocates say N.S. shooting review will not have enough 'feminist analysis'

Alicia Draus and Karla Renic GlobalNews.ca

July 26, 2020 5:09 pm

WATCH: Calls for a public inquiry into the N.S. shooting are growing, as concerns are being raised that a review will not be transparent enough, and one group says it’s missing a very important perspective. Alicia Draus reports.

After the federal and provincial governments announced a joint independent review into the Nova Scotia shooting on Thursday, calls for a public inquiry are growing stronger.

One group says a review might not go far enough in ensuring full transparency, and in considering a feminist lens.

“We’ve been speaking ever since, trying to bring in the aspect of misogyny, and the connection between male violence against women and mass shootings,” says Linda MacDonald, an organizer for the Nova Scotian Feminists Fighting Femicide group.

The group has been advocating for a public inquiry into the shooting with a feminist lens.

But, on Thursday, Nova Scotia Justice Minister Mark Furey and Canada’s Public Safety Minister Bill Blair announced the governments will be doing a three-panel review of what had happened, instead of a public inquiry.

“That makes me very leery that the truth will not come out,” said Jeanne Sarson, a member of NSFFF.

“They have the power, they have the authority and they can control it,” MacDonald said.

Of the 22 victims in the April 18-19 shooting rampage, nine victims were male; 13 were female.

While part of the review’s commitments includes a look at the contributing and contextual factors, including gender-based and intimate partner violence, and police policies, procedures and training for gender-based and intimate partner violence, MacDonald and Sarson say that’s not enough.

“We’d been asking for a feminist analysis which is to look at women and women’s position and what violence against women means in Nova Scotia,” Sarson says.

“We’re asking that, from a feminist analysis, that you look at the position of women in general, and the violence that women endure, in general.”

On July 23, 10 members of parliament signed a letter supporting the review and applauding the inclusion of a feminist lens.

Saturday, MacDonald emailed the MPs saying:

“We are asking that you as Members of Parliament either retract your statement that the review includes a ‘feminist analysis’ or provide us with the written evidence that a ‘feminist analysis’ is included in the federal-provincial review mandate.”

Sarson notes that misogyny played a role in allowing the gunman’s violent past to slip through the cracks.

In 2013, Portapique resident Brenda Forbes raised concerns over the gunman’s domestic violence and reported it to the RCMP, but that complaint never went anywhere, she told Global News in April.

The NSFFF members say society as a whole failed to take these allegations seriously, and let misogynistic behavior continue.

“Brenda went to her boss, in the military, and told her boss she was being stalked, and he said ‘get used to it’,” said MacDonald.

“That’s the expansion of the misogyny beyond the police.”

MacDonald and Sarson say a public inquiry is needed to better understand how misogyny in our society can lead and contribute to violence against women and what can be done to prevent it.

A review, they said, cannot do the same.

“You’re not going to stop violence in silence, and that’s what this review is; it’s a silent process,” said MacDonald.

“We want an open participatory process.”

On Wednesday, July 29, advocates for a public inquiry are planning a peaceful march, “to support the families of the victims,” says the Facebook page.

https://q107.com/news/7220603/nova-scotia-shooting-public-inquiry-halifax-strike/

Activists to strike in Halifax, demand public inquiry into Nova Scotia mass shooting

Staff The Canadian Press July 27, 2020 6:22 am

People are gathering at a Halifax park Monday to demand a public inquiry into the Nova Scotia mass shootings.

The gathering at Victoria Park comes less than a week after the province unveiled a plan for a panel review into the massacre.

Organizers say a 22-minute general strike will begin at noon local time to honour the 22 victims who were killed last April.

Several local women’s rights advocates, as well as Dartmouth South MLA Claudia Chender, of Nova Scotia’s New Democrats, are expected to speak at the rally.

Many of the victims’ families have called for a public inquiry into what happened during the shootings on April 18 and 19 and what led to the rampage.

Activists, lawyers, Nova Scotia opposition parties and federal senators from across Canada have also joined that call over the past several months.

But the federal and Nova Scotia governments said last week that a three-person panel would be set up to review the massacre.

That review body will be led by Michael MacDonald, a former chief justice of Nova Scotia, and includes former federal Liberal cabinet minister Anne McLellan, and Leanne Fitch, the former chief of police in Fredericton.

Nova Scotia Premier Stephen McNeil said that he believes the panel will be able to get the answers that the victims’ families are demanding.

READ MORE: ‘We want a public inquiry’ — families speak out against N.S. shooting review

He also told reporters that the panellists will be able to ask his government for assistance should they need it.

But critics have criticized a perceived lack of transparency and say the panel does not have enough power to lead an in-depth investigation.

The organizers of Monday’s rally expressed hope that they will be able to pressure Ottawa and Halifax to reverse course and ultimately order a public inquiry.

“We need systemic and structural change to come from this,” Martha Paynter, one of the event organizers, said in an interview on Saturday.

---------- Original message ----------
From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 21:48:08 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE The "Strike back: Demand an inquiry
Event." Methinks it interesting that Martha Paynter is supported by
the Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation N'esy Pas?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.

Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
office hours, both over the phone and via email.

Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en

Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.

Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus>

Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
as possible.

Best,

MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.cabill.blair@parl.gc.ca>

**
Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.

Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
que par courrier ?lectronique.

En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
site:https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr

En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
courrier ?lectronique.

Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
site : http://www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus

Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.

Cordialement,

Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.cabill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
< mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>

---------- Original message ----------
From: Finance Minister <FinanceMinister@novascotia.ca>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 21:48:16 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE The "Strike back: Demand an inquiry
Event." Methinks it interesting that Martha Paynter is supported by
the Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Your email has been received by the Office of the NS Minister of
Finance & Treasury Board.

Please be assured that your message will be reviewed and actioned accordingly.

If you are contacting the Honourable Karen Casey as your MLA, please
contact her constituency office at KarenCasey@eastlink.ca or by phone
(902) 641-2200.

Thank you for your patience.

Office of the Minister
NS Department of Finance & Treasury Board

---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 21:48:15 +0000
Subject: RE: RE The "Strike back: Demand an inquiry Event." Methinks
it interesting that Martha Paynter is supported by the Pierre Elliott
Trudeau Foundation N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Due to the evolving COVID-19 situation, we apologize in advance for
any delay in responding to your enquiry. In the meantime, information
on Canada's COVID-19 Economic Response Plan is available on the
Government of Canada website at
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus> or by
calling 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) or 1-833-784-4397.

Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
En raison de la fluidité de la crise de la COVID-19, il est possible
que nous retardions à vous répondre et nous nous en excusons.
Entre-temps, les informations au sujet du Plan d'intervention
économique du Canada pour répondre à la COVID-19 sont disponibles dans
le site Web du gouvernement du Canada au
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus> ou en
composant le
1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) ou le 1-833-784-4397.

---------- Original message ----------
From: "kelly@kellyregan.ca" <kelly@kellyregan.ca>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 23:48:04 +0200
Subject: Auto Reply
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

[This is an auto reply]

Thank you for contacting the constituency office of the Hon. Kelly
Regan, MLA for Bedford. This office is here to assist residents of
the Bedford community. If you are looking to reach the Department of
Community Services, please call 1-877-424-1177.

In order to ensure a proper and timely response to your matter, please
include all necessary contact information in your correspondence,
including your name, address, phone number/e-mail, and the nature of
your matter.

This constituency office is a respectful workplace. Please be advised
that we are unable to respond to communications involving profanity,
personal attacks, racism, homophobia, or other forms of
discrimination.

Thank you and have a great day.

Traci Sullivan
Constituency Assistant
Office of the Honourable Kelly Regan | MLA, Bedford
 902-407-3777 |  902-407-3779 | www.kellyregan.ca | 1550 Bedford
Highway | Suite 555 | Bedford, NS B4A 1E6

---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 21:48:14 +0000
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email to Premier McNeil. This is an automatic
confirmation your message has been received.

We recognize that Nova Scotians have concerns about novel coronavirus
(COVID-19). If you are looking for up-to-date information, we
encourage you to visit:
novascotia.ca/coronavirus<https://novascotia.ca/coronavirus/> or
canada.ca/coronavirus<https://canada.ca/coronavirus>. You can also
call the toll-free information line at 1-833-784-4397.

If you are experiencing symptoms, please use the COVID-19 online
self-assessment, which can be found here:
https://when-to-call-about-covid19.novascotia.ca/en

On April 18th and 19th, our province experienced an unimaginable
tragedy, in already difficult times.

To share your condolences, please visit StrongerTogetherNS on
Facebook, or by sending them to
condolences@novascotia.cacondolences@novascotia.ca>.

To contribute to the Stronger Together Nova Scotia Fund, created in
partnership with the Canadian Red Cross, visit redcross.ca and search
for the Stronger Together Nova Scotia Fund, or call 1-800-418-1111.

Kind Regards,

Premier’s Correspondence Team

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 18:48:00 -0300
Subject: RE The "Strike back: Demand an inquiry Event." Methinks it
interesting that Martha Paynter is supported by the Pierre Elliott
Trudeau Foundation N'esy Pas?
To: Norman Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>, CabalCookies
<cabalcookies@protonmail.com>, El.Jones@msvu.ca,
tim@halifaxexaminer.ca, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
kevin.leahy@pps-spp.gc.ca, Charles.Murray@gnb.ca, JUSTWEB
<JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>, AgentMargaritaville@protonmail.com,
"Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "kevin.leahy"
<kevin.leahy@pps-spp.parl.gc.ca>, lagenomai4@protonmail.com,
mlaritcey@bellaliant.com, mla@esmithmccrossinmla.com,
toryrushtonmla@bellaliant.com, kelly@kellyregan.ca,
mla_assistant@alanapaon.com, stephenmcneil@ns.aliantzinc.ca, PREMIER
<PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, info@hughmackay.ca, pictoueastamanda@gmail.com,
markfurey.mla@eastlink.ca, claudiachendermla@gmail.com,
FinanceMinister@novascotia.ca, "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, istayhealthy8@gmail.com,
prmi@eastlink.ca, "PETER.MACKAY" <PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com>,
"Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>

BTW I inserted a lot more info in this blog

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/07/independent-panel-slap-in-face-says.html

https://www.halifaxexaminer.ca/province-house/protesters-decry-shocking-and-paternalistic-decision-to-hold-review-not-inquiry-into-nova-scotia-mass-shooting/

Protesters decry ‘shocking and paternalistic’ decision to hold review,
not inquiry into Nova Scotia mass shooting
July 27, 2020 By Yvette d'Entremont

Gathered at Victoria Park in Halifax at noon Monday for a general
strike intended to draw attention to demands for a public inquiry into
the Nova Scotia mass killing.

The event was slated to run from noon to 12:22, a 22-minute strike to
pay homage to the 22 people whose lives were taken during the weekend
of April 18-19.

“This is something that all sectors of society have asked for,” Martha
Paynter, founder and coordinator of Women’s Wellness Within, told
reporters before the event started.

Her organization works for reproductive justice, prison abolition and
health equity. It was one of several feminist community activist and
advocacy groups behind Monday’s ‘Strike back: Demand an inquiry’
event."

https://marthapaynter.ca/

‘Strike back: Demand an inquiry’ event." is a registered nurse
providing abortion and postpartum care. She is a Doctoral Candidate in
Nursing at Dalhousie University. She is the founder and coordinator of
Women’s Wellness Within, a non-profit organization supporting
criminalized women and transgender/nonbinary individuals in the
perinatal period in carceral institutions and the community. She works
to advance reproductive justice through advocacy, collaboration and
nursing scholarship.

For her nursing advocacy and research, Martha has received numerous
awards including the 2018 Rising Star Award from the Canadian
Association of Perinatal and Women’s Health Nurses, the 2018 Health
Advocacy Award from the Council of the College of Registered Nurses of
Nova Scotia, the 2018 3M National Student Fellowship, and in 2017, the
Senate of Canada Sesquicentennial Medal for volunteer service to the
country.

Martha’s doctoral research is supported by the Pierre Elliott Trudeau
Foundation, CIHR Banting-Best Canadian Doctoral Scholarship, the
Killam Predoctoral Scholarship, the Canadian Nurses Foundation,
Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre"

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2019 11:29:02 -0400
Subject: Attn El Jones I just called and left a message saying Iiked your style
To: El.Jones@msvu.ca, tim@halifaxexaminer.ca, "steve.murphy"
<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
Cc: "David.Raymond.Amos" <David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com>

https://www.halifaxexaminer.ca/featured/prisons-refugees-cats/#3.%20Fight%20me%20over%20cat%20names

Prisons, Refugees, Cats

August 5, 2018 By El Jones

Martha Paynter was driving through New Brunswick this weekend and
texted me that she saw a billboard for the Airbnb in the old
Dorchester Jail.

Among the attractions listed on the website are that it was the site
of the last double hanging in New Brunswick (more on that in a
moment), with a highlight being that guests can stay in the former
cells.

tim@halifaxexaminer.ca

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayro4wYzckg&t=64s

El Jones - Judges
1,107 views
el jones
Published on May 25, 2016

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7y0IkmSVTc

Canada is So Polite - El Jones
2,895 views
Janice Jo Lee
Published on Jan 25, 2018

https://www.msvu.ca/en/home/aboutus/news/ElJonesNamedNancysChair.aspx

El Jones appointed Nancy’s Chair in Women’s Studies at the Mount

El’s office is located in the McCain Centre (room 208B). She can be
reached at El.Jones@msvu.ca or 902-457-6257.

---------- Original message ----------
From: Kevin Leahy <kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 12:38:43 -0400
Subject: Re: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge (857 259
9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

French will follow

Thank you for your email.

For inquiries regarding EMRO’s Office, please address your email to
acting EMRO Sebastien Brillon at sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

For inquiries regarding CO NHQ Office, please address your email to
acting CO Farquharson, David at David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

All PPS related correspondence should be sent to my PPS account at
kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Merci pour votre courriel.

Pour toute question concernant le Bureau de l'EMRO, veuillez adresser
vos courriels à l’Officier responsable des Relations
employeur-employés par intérim Sébastien Brillon à l'adresse suivante
sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Pour toute question concernant le bureau du Commandant de la
Direction générale, veuillez adresser vos courriels au Commandant de
la Direction générale par intérim Farquharson, David à l'adresse
suivante David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Toute correspondance relative au Service De Protection Parlementaire
doit être envoyée à mon compte de PPS à l'adresse suivante
kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca

Kevin Leahy
Chief Superintendent/Surintendant principal
Director, Parliamentary Protective Service
Directeur , Service de protection parlementaire
T 613-996-5048
Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are
confidential and may contain protected information. It is intended
only for the individual or entity named in the message. If you are not
the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver the
message that this email contains to the intended recipient, you should
not disseminate, distribute or copy this email, nor disclose or use in
any manner the information that it contains. Please notify the sender
immediately if you have received this email by mistake and delete it.
AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ: Le présent courriel et tout fichier qui y est
joint sont confidentiels et peuvent contenir des renseignements
protégés. Il est strictement réservé à l’usage du destinataire prévu.
Si vous n’êtes pas le destinataire prévu, ou le mandataire chargé de
lui transmettre le message que ce courriel contient, vous ne devez ni
le diffuser, le distribuer ou le copier, ni divulguer ou utiliser à
quelque fin que ce soit les renseignements qu’il contient. Veuillez
aviser immédiatement l’expéditeur si vous avez reçu ce courriel par
erreur et supprimez-le.

---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 16:38:41 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge
(857 259 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.

There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.

Thanks again for your email.
______

Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

Merci encore pour votre courriel.

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 11:55:57 -0400
Subject: Re the CBA, the RCMP, Federal Court File # T-1557-15 and the
Hearing before the Federal Court of Appeal on May 24th 2017
To: ray.adlington@mcinnescooper.com, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"bob.paulson" <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>, "bill.pentney"
<bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, Mordaith
<Mordaith@gmail.com>, "leanne.murray"
<leanne.murray@mcinnescooper.com>, gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>,
"Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "nick.moore"
<nick.moore@bellmedia.ca>, "jeremy.keefe"
<jeremy.keefe@globalnews.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
"Gilles.Blinn" <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
<Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, sallybrooks25 <sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch
<jbosnitch@gmail.com>, "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>,
premier <premier@gnb.ca>, "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
"Larry.Tremblay" <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "luc.labonte"
<luc.labonte@gnb.ca>

As I told the RCMP who called me last month the proper time and place
to discuss the CBA and your former partner Judge Richard Bell is the
Federal Court of Canada

Raymond G. Adlington Partner
McInnes Cooper
1300-1969 Upper Water St., Purdy's Wharf Tower II PO Box 730, Stn. Central
Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 2V1
Phone: (902) 444-8470
Fax: (902) 425-6350
E: ray.adlington@mcinnescooper.com

http://www.mcinnescooper.com/news/ray-adlington-named-to-cba-board-of-directors/

Ray Adlington named to CBA Board of Directors

May 2, 2017

Halifax partner Ray Adlington was recently named to the CBA Board of Directors.

In their announcement yesterday the CBA advised that the board would
come into effect September 1st, 2017.

After collecting extensive input over the past two years, we know
that CBA members believe it’s important for the organization to have a
Board of Directors that reflects the diversity of the legal
profession, including a mix of practice types, experience, skills,
geography and more.
Our new Board of Directors exemplifies this principle.

The board is composed from one member from each province as well as
the CBA President.

Congratulations Ray on this well deserved appointment.

> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:15:59 -0400
> Subject: Hey Ralph Goodale perhaps you and the RCMP should call the
> Yankees Governor Charlie Baker, his lawyer Bob Ross, Rachael Rollins
> and this cop Robert Ridge (857 259 9083) ASAP EH Mr Primme Minister
> Trudeau the Younger and Donald Trump Jr?
> To: pm@pm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
> Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, djtjr@trumporg.com,
> Donald.J.Trump@donaldtrump.com, JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca,
> Frank.McKenna@td.com, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Douglas.Johnson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> gov.press@state.ma.us, bob.ross@state.ma.us, jfurey@nbpower.com,
> jfetzer@d.umn.edu, Newsroom@globeandmail.com, sfine@globeandmail.com,
> .Poitras@cbc.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
> Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, news@kingscorecord.com,
> news@dailygleaner.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, jbosnitch@gmail.com,
> andre@jafaust.com>
> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, DJT@trumporg.com
> wharrison@nbpower.com, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca
>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Murray, Charles (Ombud)" <Charles.Murray@gnb.ca>
>> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 18:16:15 +0000
>> Subject: You wished to speak with me
>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I have the advantage, sir, of having read many of your emails over the
>> years.
>>
>>
>> As such, I do not think a phone conversation between us, and
>> specifically one which you might mistakenly assume was in response to
>> your threat of legal action against me, is likely to prove a
>> productive use of either of our time.
>>
>>
>> If there is some specific matter about which you wish to communicate
>> with me, feel free to email me with the full details and it will be
>> given due consideration.
>>
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>>
>> Charles Murray
>>
>> Ombud NB
>>
>> Acting Integrity Commissioner
>>
>>
>>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos,
>>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>>> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
>>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>>
>>> Department of Justice
>>>
>>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>>
>>>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
>>>> ilian.html
>>>>
>>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>>>>
>>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>>>>
>>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>>>> cards?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
>>>>> 6
>>>>>
>>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>>>>
>>>>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>>>>
>>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>>> United States Senate
>>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>>> tapes.
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>>>
>>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Good Day Sir
>>>>
>>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>>
>>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>>
>>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>>
>>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>>
>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>>>>
>>>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>>>
>>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>>>>
>>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>>>>
>>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>>
>>>> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>>
>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>>
>>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>>
>>>> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>>
>>>> Date: 20151223
>>>>
>>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>>
>>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>>
>>>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>>
>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>>
>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>>
>>>> Plaintiff
>>>>
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>>
>>>> Defendant
>>>>
>>>> ORDER
>>>>
>>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>>
>>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>>> in its entirety.
>>>>
>>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>>>> he stated:
>>>>
>>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>>
>>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>>> Police.
>>>>
>>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>>
>>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>>> Judge
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>>
>>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>>
>>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>>> most
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>>>> dudes are way past too late
>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>
>>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>>
>>>> Merci ,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>>
>>>> January 13, 2015
>>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>>
>>>> December 8, 2014
>>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>>
>>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>>
>>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>>
>>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>>
>>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>>
>>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>>
>>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>>
>>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>>>
>>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>>
>>>> Subject:
>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. $DH/MS$" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>>
>>>> January 30, 2007
>>>>
>>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>>
>>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>>
>>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>>
>>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>>> Minister of Health
>>>>
>>>> CM/cb
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
>>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>>
>>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>>
>>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>>
>>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>
>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>>> The Supreme Court
>>>
>>> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do
>>>
>>>
>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>>
>>> Amos v. Canada
>>> Court (s) Database
>>>
>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>> Date
>>>
>>> 2017-10-30
>>> Neutral citation
>>>
>>> 2017 FCA 213
>>> File numbers
>>>
>>> A-48-16
>>> Date: 20171030
>>>
>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>> CORAM:
>>>
>>> WEBB J.A.
>>> NEAR J.A.
>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>> and
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>>
>>> THE COURT
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Date: 20171030
>>>
>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>> CORAM:
>>>
>>> WEBB J.A.
>>> NEAR J.A.
>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>> and
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>>
>>> I. Introduction
>>>
>>> [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
>>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
>>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
>>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>>
>>> [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
>>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>>
>>>
>>> [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>>> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
>>> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
>>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>>
>>>
>>> [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
>>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>>> cross-appeal.
>>>
>>>
>>> II. Preliminary Matter
>>>
>>> [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
>>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
>>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>>
>>> [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
>>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>>> c. F-7:
>>>
>>>
>>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>>> Appeal.
>>> […]
>>>
>>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>>> […]
>>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>>
>>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
>>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>>
>>>
>>> [7] However, these subsections only provide that the
>>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>>> section.
>>> [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>>> that:
>>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
>>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>
>>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
>>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
>>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>>> matière civile et pénale.
>>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>
>>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>>
>>>
>>> [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
>>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
>>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
>>> appeal book.
>>>
>>>
>>> [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>>
>>>
>>> [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>>
>>>
>>> [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>>> such judge had a conflict.
>>>
>>>
>>> [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
>>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>>> was a member of such firm.
>>>
>>>
>>> [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
>>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
>>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
>>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>>
>>>
>>> [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
>>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
>>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
>>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>>> [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
>>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>>> apprehension of bias:
>>> 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
>>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>>
>>> [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>>> (4th) 193).
>>>
>>> [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
>>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
>>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>>> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
>>> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>>> 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>>
>>>
>>> 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
>>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>>
>>>
>>> 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>>
>>>
>>> 30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
>>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
>>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
>>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>>> To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
>>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>>> 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>>
>>>
>>> 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>>> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
>>> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
>>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
>>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
>>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
>>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>>> events from over a decade ago.
>>> (emphasis added)
>>>
>>> [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
>>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
>>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>>
>>> [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
>>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
>>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>>
>>> [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
>>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>>
>>> [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
>>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
>>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>>
>>> [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
>>> to recuse himself.
>>>
>>> [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
>>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>>
>>> [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
>>> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>>
>>>
>>> III. Issue
>>>
>>> [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
>>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>>
>>> IV. Analysis
>>>
>>> A. Standard of Review
>>>
>>> [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
>>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
>>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>>
>>> [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
>>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>>> interfere.
>>>
>>>
>>> B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>>
>>> [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>>
>>> 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
>>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
>>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>>> (…)
>>>
>>>
>>> 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
>>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>>> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
>>> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
>>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>>> [footnotes omitted].
>>>
>>>
>>> [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
>>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
>>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>>> para. 27).
>>>
>>>
>>> [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
>>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>>
>>>
>>> [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
>>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>>
>>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>>
>>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>>>
>>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
>>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>>
>>> [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
>>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>>
>>> [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
>>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>>
>>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
>>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>>> of process…
>>>
>>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>>
>>> [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>>
>>> [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
>>> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
>>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
>>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>>> supporting a cause of action.
>>>
>>> [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>>
>>> V. Conclusion
>>> [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>>> without leave to amend.
>>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>>> J.A.
>>> "David G. Near"
>>> J.A.
>>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>>> J.A.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>>
>>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
>>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>>> DOCKET:
>>>
>>> A-48-16
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>>
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>>
>>> Fredericton,
>>> New Brunswick
>>>
>>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>>
>>> May 24, 2017
>>>
>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>>
>>> WEBB J.A.
>>> NEAR J.A.
>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>
>>> DATED:
>>>
>>> October 30, 2017
>>>
>>> APPEARANCES:
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>
>>>
>>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>>> (on his own behalf)
>>>
>>> Jan Jensen
>>>
>>>
>>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>
>>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>>
>>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>
>>>
>

---------- Original message ----------
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 19:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: Now everybody and his dog knows TJ Burke and his cop buddies
allegations against me are false and you had the proof all along EH
Chucky?
To: oldmaison@yahoo.com, nbombud@gnb.ca, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca,
jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, news@dailygleaner.com,
kcarmichael@bloomberg.net, advocacycollective@yahoo.com,
Easter.W@parl.gc.ca, Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca, cityadmin@fredericton.ca,
info@gg.ca, bmosher@mosherchedore.ca, rchedore@mosherchedore.ca,
police@fredericton.ca, chebert@thestar.ca, Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca,
Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, alltrue@nl.rogers.com,
Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca,
Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca
CC: dgleg@nb.aibn.com, brad.woodside@fredericton.ca,
whalen@fredericton.ca, david.kelly@fredericton.ca,
cathy.maclaggan@fredericton.ca, stephen.kelly@fredericton.ca,
tom.jellinek@fredericton.ca, scott.mcconaghy@fredericton.ca,
marilyn.kerton@fredericton.ca, walter.brown@fredericton.ca,
norah.davidson@fredericton.ca, mike.obrien@fredericton.ca,
bruce.grandy@fredericton.ca, dan.keenan@fredericton.ca,
jeff.mockler@gnb.ca, mrichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca,
cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca, jlmockler@mpor.ca,
scotta@parl.gc.ca, michael.bray@gnb.ca, jack.e.mackay@gnb.ca
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new-brunswick/story/2007/05/24/nb-burkethreat.html

http://www.canadaeast.com/ce2/docroot/article.php?articleID=149018

http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/2007/05/tj-burke-walking-around-with-rcmp.html

http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/2006/06/fapo-has-meeting-about-panhanding.html

http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/2007/05/hats-off-to-cbc-reporter-jacques.html

http://maritimes.indymedia.org/mail.php?id=9856

Methinks your liberal pals just made a major faux pas N'est Pas?
Scroll down Frenchie and go down?.

Threat against Burke taken seriously

By STEPHEN LLEWELLYN
dgleg@nb.aibn.com
Published Thursday May 24th, 2007
Appeared on page A1
An RCMP security detail has been guarding Justice Minister and
Attorney General T.J. Burke because of threats made against him
recently.

Burke, the Liberal MLA for Fredericton-Fort Nashwaaksis, wouldn't
explain the nature of the threats.

"I have had a particular individual or individuals who have made
specific overtures about causing harm towards me," he told reporters
Wednesday.

"The RCMP has provided security to me recently by accompanying me to a
couple of public functions where the individual is known to reside or
have family members in the area," said Burke. "It is nice to have some
added protection and that added comfort."

The RCMP provides protection to the premier and MLAs with its VIP security unit.

Burke didn't say when the threat was made but it's believed to have
been in recent weeks.

"When a threat is posed to you and it is a credible threat, you have
to be cautious about where you go and who you are around," he said.
"But again, I am more concerned about my family as opposed to my own
personal safety."

Burke said he doesn't feel any differently and he has not changed his
pattern of activity.

"It doesn't bother me one bit," he said. "It makes my wife feel awful nervous."

Burke served in an elite American military unit before becoming a
lawyer and going into politics in New Brunswick.

"(I) have taken my own precautions and what I have to do to ensure my
family's safety," he said. "I am a very cautious person in general due
to my background and training.

"I am comfortable with defending myself or my family if it ever had to happen."

Burke said it is not uncommon for politicians to have security concerns.

"We do live unfortunately in an age and in a society now where threats
have to be taken pretty seriously," he said.

Since the terrorism attacks in the United States on Sept. 11, 2001,
security in New Brunswick has been
beefed up.

Metal detectors were recently installed in the legislature and all
visitors are screened.

The position of attorney general is often referred to as the
province's "top cop."

Burke said sometimes people do not differentiate between his role as
the manager of the justice system and the individual who actually
prosecutes them.

"With the job sometimes comes threats," he said. "I have had numerous
threats since Day 1 in office."

Burke said he hopes his First Nations heritage has nothing to do with it.

"I think it is more of an issue where people get fixated on a matter
and they believe you are personally responsible for assigning them
their punishment or their sanction," he said.

Is the threat from someone who was recently incarcerated?

"I probably shouldn't answer that," he replied.

Reporters asked when the threat would be over.

"I don't think a threat ever passes once it has been made," said
Burke. "You have to consider the credibility of the source."

Bruce Fitch, former justice minister in the Conservative government,
said "every now and again there would be e-mails that were not
complimentary."

"I did have a meeting with the RCMP who are in charge of the security
of the MLAs and ministers," said Fitch.

"They look at each and every situation."

Fitch said he never had bodyguards assigned to him although former
premier Bernard Lord and former health minister Elvy Robichaud did
have extra security staff assigned on occasion.

He said if any MLA felt threatened, he or she would discuss it with the RCMP.

http://www.archive.org/details/SecTreasuryDeptEtc

Small World EH Chucky Leblanc?

"Lafleur, Lou" lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca wrote:

From: "Lafleur, Lou" lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca
To: "'motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com'" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com,
"Lafleur, Lou" lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca
Subject: Fredericton Police Force
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:21:13 -0300

Dear Mr. Amos

My Name is Lou LaFleur and I am a Detective with the Fredericton
Police Major Crime Unit. I would like to talk to you regarding files
that I am investigating and that you are alleged to have involvement
in.

Please call me at your earliest convenience and leave a message and a
phone number on my secure and confidential line if I am not in my
office.

yours truly,
Cpl. Lou LaFleur
Fredericton Police Force
311 Queen St.
Fredericton, NB
506-460-2332
________________________________
This electronic mail, including any attachments, is confidential and
is for the sole use of the intended recipient and may be privileged.
Any unauthorized distribution, copying, disclosure or review is
prohibited. Neither communication over the Internet nor disclosure to
anyone other than the intended recipient constitutes waiver of
privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately
notify the sender and then delete this communication and any
attachments from your computer system and records without saving or
forwarding it. Thank you.

https://www.halifaxexaminer.ca/province-house/protesters-decry-shocking-and-paternalistic-decision-to-hold-review-not-inquiry-into-nova-scotia-mass-shooting/

Protesters decry ‘shocking and paternalistic’ decision to hold review, not inquiry into Nova Scotia mass shooting

July 27, 2020 By Yvette d'Entremont

Gathered at Victoria Park in Halifax at noon Monday for a general strike intended to draw attention to demands for a public inquiry into the Nova Scotia mass killing.

The event was slated to run from noon to 12:22, a 22-minute strike to pay homage to the 22 people whose lives were taken during the weekend of April 18-19.

“This is something that all sectors of society have asked for,” Martha Paynter, founder and coordinator of Women’s Wellness Within, told reporters before the event started.

Her organization works for reproductive justice, prison abolition and health equity. It was one of several feminist community activist and advocacy groups behind Monday’s ‘Strike back: Demand an inquiry’ event.

Martha Paynter, founder and coordinator of Women’s Wellness Within, speaks with reporters before Monday’s 22-minute event to draw attention to demands for a public inquiry into the Nova Scotia mass killing. — Photo: Yvette d’Entremont

“This is really a minimum response to the largest massacre in Canada in our lifetimes and it’s required to even begin to deal with the trauma this province has experienced,” she said.

On Thursday, the provincial and federal governments announced a joint independent review would be conducted into the tragedy rather than a public inquiry. That’s what victims’ families, national women’s organizations, senators, and many others had asked for.

Condemnation of the decision was swift. A petition started Thursday night demanding a public inquiry into the tragedy already has more than 14,000 signatures. The Facebook group ‘Nova Scotians for a Public Inquiry’ was started around the same time and already has 15,000 members.

Halifax resident Sylvie Boisvert was one of the people who attended Monday’s event. In an interview in French, she said she felt compelled to support the families and their united call for a public inquiry. Boisvert described the decision to hold a review instead of a public inquiry as “horrifying” and adding further heartbreak to the families of the 22 victims.

“When they announced this last week it was like when a company says, ‘We are reducing our hours of service to better serve you.’ I had the impression that they (government) think we’re a bunch of idiots,” Boisvert said.

“They want to make it look like they’re doing something, but in reality it’s all hidden and we know nothing will come of it. Since all of this happened, I have felt much less safe and I’ve lost all confidence in this government … I am heartbroken that on top of everything else, these families now have to fight for what should be obvious.”

About 200 people descended on Victoria Park Monday to participate in a 22-minute event to demand

a public inquiry–not a review–into the Nova Scotia’s mass shooting. — Photo: Jennifer Henderson

The event began with Paynter naming each of the 22 victims killed in the massacre. She then listed 22 reasons why Nova Scotians were demanding a full and transparent public inquiry. Many of the reasons listed were met with applause.

They included: because 22 people including a pregnant woman were murdered in less than 24 hours and each of those murders were preventable; because the victims’ families asked for a public inquiry and were denied; because the murders are rooted in gender-based violence and misogyny; because only recommendations from a public inquiry can be enforced; because this is the largest mass shooting in Canada in our lifetimes; because the police and the government are public servants and they are accountable to the public; because we deserve to know what happened.

A table was also set up onsite for people to sign pre-printed letters to mail themselves. Paynter also urged those present to email Premier Stephen McNeil and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and demand an inquiry.

Sheri Lecker, executive director of Adsum for Women and Children, was one of seven speakers to directly address the crowd. She said this was an exercise in which all Canadians needed to share and participate. She described it as “shocking and paternalistic” of government to try and determine what information the families of the victims could and could not handle, adding that the families have asked for a public inquiry and deserve nothing less.

“We like you are very concerned that it appears that for years, red flags, whispers, even outright complaints to police about the perpetrator’s domestic violence and accumulation of guns went unheeded,” Lecker said.

The event closed with a poem written by Halifax poet, professor, writer and activist El Jones. In the wee hours of Monday morning, she wrote a powerful piece about the need for a full and transparent public inquiry. The two and a half minute delivery was met with great cheers and applause.

The sentiments expressed by the speakers at Monday’s event were echoed by members of the public who spoke with the Halifax Examiner. James Misener said he believed the decision to hold a review rather than a public inquiry was “a total cop out” by the federal and provincial governments.

“There are many things that are hidden and the victims’ families will never get the answers they require this way. A review is just a way to put it under the rug,” Misener said.

“I was devastated to hear their decision but I wasn’t surprised…There’s no accountability any more and we need accountability.”

Judith Scrimger came to Halifax from Ashdale, Hants County to lend her support to the families of the victims who have been vocal in their demands for a public inquiry. She believes the families–and all Nova Scotians–deserve to know what happened not only during the massacre, but the events leading up to it. She said to move forward and learn, we need to know what failures and missteps led to the tragedy.

“The only way to do that is to make sure we’re transparent and we know what happened and we know who said what to whom,” she said. “A public inquiry is the only way that’s going to happen.”

Susan Larder and Carol Millett were among about 200 people who attended Monday’s 22 minute

event to demand a public inquiry into April’s mass shooting. — Photo: Yvette d’Entremont

Carol Millett echoed the comments of many others who attended, noting that she believes a public inquiry is the only way to get accountability from politicians, decision makers and the RCMP.

“They have to be held accountable, and the only way to do that is to get to the truth and we can only get to the truth if we require them to speak under an oath to tell the truth, simple as that,” she said.

There was also a peaceful march held in Bridgewater at 11 a.m. Monday outside of provincial Justice Minister Mark Furey’s office. Among those who participated in the march demanding a public inquiry were the families of victims Joey Webber and Joy and Peter Bond.

A peaceful march to support the victims’ families in their demand for a public inquiry is taking place on Wednesday. At 10 a.m., family members and their supporters will march from the ferry terminal to Province House. Their stated goal is a reversal of the decision to hold only a review.

Halifax Examiner, Inc. is registered as a limited liability corporation with the province of Nova Scotia. To express concerns about the site, provide notification of possible copyright infringement, or voice any other complaints, please contact Tim Bousquet at the above address or email.
The Halifax Examiner’s recognized agent is:
Margaret George
99 Wyse Road, Suite 600
Dartmouth, NS B3A 4S5
(902) 460-3463

https://boyneclarke.com/lawyers/

Note again: Please do not contact Ms. George for anything other than legal issues! If you contact Ms. George just to reach Tim about non-legal issues, he’ll be mad at you and won’t want to talk to you. The way you reach Tim is you email him. E-MAIL.
To send an encrypted email to tim@halifaxexaminer.ca,

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 12:22:39 -0400
Subject: Re CBC blocking Mean Old Me 'Enough is Enough' as two of Oland’s lawyers Billy Teed and Gary Miller once said
To: dcoles@boyneclarke.ca, "ht.lacroix" , "dan.ciraco" , "martine.turcotte" , "Robert. Jones" , oldmaison , "mclaughlin.heather" , nmoore , "serge.rousselle" , jeff.mockler@gnb.ca, bill.richards@gnb.ca, John.Henheffer@gnb.ca, James.McAvity@gnb.ca, pjveniot@nbnet.nb.ca, derek.weaver@gnb.ca, gmarquis@unb.ca, postmaster@begleylordon.com, nbpc , "steve.roberge" , "Stephen.Horsman" , david
Cc: David Amos

Methinks tis High Time for somebody to expose you and your malicious
clients within the CTV and the CBC etc to some lime light if not
perhaps history professors will write about someday EH David Coles?

http://boyneclarke.com/lawyers/david-g-coles-qc/

(902) 460-3422
dcoles@boyneclarke.ca

At least your old buddy the mindless blogger Chucky Leblanc recorded
the media frenzy in Fat Fred City N'esy Pas Mr Jones?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hHPv4gdZlM

Published on Feb 17, 2016

DENNIS OLAND IS DENIED BAIL IN FREDERICTON!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSbi4tOs8wA&spfreload=10

Published on Feb 12, 2016

Dennis Oland Bail Hearing in Fredericton is covered by Blogger and Media!

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/dennis-oland-bail-appeal-murder-1.3453286

Dennis Oland's lawyers plan to appeal bail denial
Judge ruled releasing Oland until his murder conviction appeal would
undermine public confidence in system By Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon, CBC
News Posted: Feb 18, 2016 12:47 PM AT

"Dennis Oland's defence lawyers plan to appeal a judge's decision to
deny him bail while he appeals his second-degree murder conviction in
the 2011 slaying of his father, New Brunswick multimillionare Richard
Oland.

Alan Gold confirmed the defence team is in the process of preparing an
application to New Brunswick Chief Justice Ernest Drapeau."

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2016/02/12/oland-jury-got-it-wrong-lawyer-tells-appeal-court-as-he-seeks-bail_n_9218698.html

Dennis Oland Never Should Have Been Convicted, Lawyer Tells Judge
CP | By Kevin Bissett, The Canadian Press Posted: 02/12/2016 10:58 am EST

Alan Gold, left, part of Dennis Oland's defence team, and Bill Teed,
the Oland family lawyer, head from the Law Courts as his murder trial
continues in Saint John on Oct. 21, 2015. (Photo: Andrew
Vaughan/Canadian Press)

"There is nothing in the evidence that warrants the continued
detention of Dennis Oland."

Richard Oland's body was found face down in a pool of blood in his
Saint John office on July 7, 2011.

He had suffered 45 blunt and sharp force blows to his head, neck and
hands, although no weapon was ever found.

Gold said the trial judge's instructions at the end of the trial
allowed the jurors to conclude that since there was little blood on
Dennis Oland's brown jacket there would be little blood on his
cellular telephone.

    "There is nothing in the evidence that warrants the continued
detention of Dennis Oland."

The lawyer said the judge should have provided instructions that
cautioned against this kind of reasoning.

Gold argued there was plenty of evidence that there should have been a
large amount of blood splatter on the jacket, and he added the
miniscule stains on Oland's jacket were never identified as spatter.

The lawyer also said bail should be granted because of trial evidence
Dennis Oland wasn't at his father's office when a witness described
hearing thumping sounds coming from the room, but instead shopping in
the Saint John suburb of Rothesay.

In an affidavit filed with the court, Oland says he would continue to
work as a director of his father's companies and live at home with his
wife, Lisa, if granted bail.

dennis oland murder trial
Dennis Oland is depicted in an artist's sketch at the Law Courts
during his sentencing in Saint John, N.B. on Thursday. Oland was found
guilty of second degree murder in the death of his father, Richard
Oland, who was found dead in his Saint John office on July 7, 2011.
(Photo: Carol Taylor/Canadian Press)

Both his mother and uncle say they have unencumbered assets of at
least $1 million each and are prepared to provide whatever level of
bail the court may set.

Justice John Walsh said in his sentencing ruling Thursday in Saint
John that the younger Oland, an investment advisor, "simply lost it,
snapped, or exploded."

Following his conviction, Oland's mother Connie said in statement the
family was shocked by the outcome and that she and other family
members continued to believe he was innocent.

The Olands are an establishment family in the history of the
Maritimes, having founded Moosehead Breweries, although Richard Oland
left the family business in 1981.

During the trial, the Crown focused on possible motives, including
Dennis Oland's financial difficulties and the knowledge his father was
having an affair.

The key piece of evidence for the Crown was a brown jacket worn by
Dennis Oland that had a number of small blood stains and also DNA that
matched the profile of Richard Oland.

More:
Video Dennis Oland Dennis Oland Trial Dennis Oland New Brunswick
Dennis Oland Charged Dennis Oland Murder Trial Dennis Oland Conviction
Second Degree Murder Alan Gold Dennis Oland Lawyer Richard Oland
Murder

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/oland-police-commission-appeal-review-1.3425935

Dennis Oland appeal halts review of police investigation of father's murder
New Brunswick Police Commission does not want its review to affect
Dennis Oland's proceedings By Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon, CBC News Posted:
Jan 29, 2016 3:54 PM AT

The New Brunswick Police Commission has suspended its review of the
Saint John Police Force's handling of the Richard Oland murder
investigation, citing Dennis Oland's appeal.

"We wish to ensure that a Commission investigation does not affect or
impact the ongoing criminal proceedings," the commission said in a
statement released on Friday.

"It is the Commission's intention to resume the investigation at the
conclusion of the criminal proceedings," it said.

Dennis Oland, 47, was found guilty by a jury on Dec. 19 of
second–degree murder in the 2011 bludgeoning death of his
multimillionaire father.

His lawyers filed a notice of appeal and an application for bail with
the New Brunswick Court of Appeal in Fredericton on Jan. 20.
ns-hi-richard-oland-852

Richard Oland, 69, was found dead in his Saint John office on July 7,
2011. (Canadian Yachting Association)

They are seeking to have the conviction quashed, and either an
acquittal entered or a new trial ordered.

Oland is scheduled to be sentenced on Feb. 11, with his request for
bail slated to be heard the following day.

The commission, an independent provincial oversight body, launched its
review just days after Oland's conviction, at the request of the
then-chair of the Saint John Board of Police Commissioners.

Nicole Paquet said at the time she felt the review was necessary for
the public's confidence in the force, and that it would also be
important for the morale of the police officers themselves.

Several problems with the murder investigation were highlighted during
the high-profile trial.

The jury heard evidence that police failed to protect the crime scene
from possible contamination, used the bathroom located in the foyer
outside the victim's office for two days before it was forensically
tested, and never tested the back door for evidence.

A key piece of evidence in the Crown's case against Oland — a
blood-stained brown sports jacket — was also handled by the former
lead investigator with his bare hands and rolled up into a 30
centimetre by 30 centimetre paper exhibit bag by another officer, the
jury heard.

Kathleen Lordon, a lawyer and former Crown prosecutor, had already
been selected by the commission to handle the review.

Once it's complete, the results and any recommendations will be
advanced to the minister of public safety for consideration, officials
have said.

The body of Richard Oland, 69, was discovered laying face down in a
pool of blood in his Saint John office on July 7, 2011. He had
suffered 45 sharp and blunt force injuries to his head, neck and
hands.

His son, Dennis Oland, was the last known person to see his father
alive during a meeting at his office the night before.

Oland was deemed a suspect on the first day of the investigation, but
wasn't charged until more than two years later, on Nov. 13, 2013.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/dennis-oland-murder-trial-sees-new-crown-prosecutor-appointed-1.3188298

Dennis Oland murder trial sees new Crown prosecutor appointed
Paul (P.J.) Veniot takes over for John Henheffer just weeks before
trial is scheduled to start By Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon, CBC News

The lead Crown prosecutor in the Dennis Oland murder trial has been
replaced, just weeks before the jury trial is scheduled to start, CBC
News has learned.

John Henheffer has been handling the file since at least November
2013, when Oland was charged with second-degree murder in the July
2011 death of his father, prominent Saint John businessman Richard
Oland.

But Henheffer has had to step aside for personal health reasons,
officials from the Office of the Attorney General said in an emailed
statement late Wednesday afternoon.

Retired Crown prosecutor Paul (P.J.) Veniot has taken over, as of Tuesday.

"We can confirm that P.J. Veniot has joined the prosecution's team for
the trial of R v Dennis Oland," the statement said.
ns-hi-richard-oland-852

Richard Oland, 69, was found dead in his Saint John office on July 7,
2011. (Canadian Yachting Association)

"The trial will continue as scheduled."

Jury selection is scheduled to begin on Sept. 8 at Harbour Station.
About 3,000 people have received summonses — 10 times the normal jury
panel.

The trial itself is slated to start on Sept. 16 and is expected to last 65 days.

Gary Miller, one of Oland's defence lawyers, has previously referred
to the Crown's file as "voluminous."

Veniot won't be alone, however. There are two other Crown prosecutors
involved — Patrick Wilbur and Derek Weaver.

Oland, 46, is accused of killing his father, whose body was discovered
in his uptown office on July 7, 2011.

Several pre-trial hearings have been held in recent months, including
one on Wednesday, but details about them are subject to a publication
ban.
Veteran prosecutor

Veniot, the former senior regional Crown prosecutor for northeastern
New Brunswick, has handled other high-profile cases over the years,
including the murder trial of Justin Bourque, who went on a shooting
rampage in Moncton in June 2014, killing three Mounties and wounding
two others.

Retired Crown prosecutor Paul (P.J.) Veniot

Retired Crown prosecutor Paul (P.J.) Veniot has joined the
prosecution's team for Dennis Oland's second-degree murder trial.
(CBC)

Bourque, who pleaded guilty to three counts of first-degree murder and
two counts of attempted murder, was sentenced to life in prison with
no chance of parole for 75 years — the longest sentence in Canadian
history, and the harshest since the death penalty was abolished.

Veniot was also the Crown prosecutor who recommended fisheries
officers lay charges in 2011 against the brother of then-deputy
premier Paul Robichaud, despite a directive that the case be dropped.

Veniot testified he also refused a request from the head of
enforcement that he find a way to withdraw the charges against Donat
Robichaud after they'd been laid.

Robichaud wound up pleading guilty in April 2012 to one charge of
violating the Aquaculture Act at his oyster farm, was ordered to pay a
$480 fine and a 20 per cent victim surcharge.

Veniot also served as counsel to the coroner during the inquest into
the death of Serena Perry.

Perry, 22, was an involuntary psychiatric patient at the Saint John
Regional Hospital when her body was discovered on Feb. 14, 2012, in
the hospital's amphitheatre, which is located in another section of
the facility.

No charges were ever laid in the case, but the coroner's jury deemed
her death a homicide and made 11 recommendations to help prevent other
similar deaths.

Among them was that New Brunswick follow the lead of several other
provinces and introduce community treatment order legislation.

Oland continues to live in the community under several conditions,
pending his trial. His extended family has stood by him from the
beginning, maintaining his innocence.

Paul J. Veniot
Called to the bar: 1981 (NB); Q.C.2006 (NB)
Veniot, Paul J.
404 King Ave.
Bathurst, New Brunswick E2A 1P5
Phone: 506-546-8115
Fax: 506-546-6514
Email: pjveniot@nbnet.nb.ca

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/enough-is-enough-oland-lawyers-argue-1.1699785

'Enough is enough,' Oland lawyers argue
Family subjected to 'media frenzy,' 'poison climate,' say Gary Miller
and Bill Teed
By Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon , CBC News Posted: Sep 07, 2013 2:06 PM AT

Oland lawyers Bill Teed (left) and Gary Miller, pictured here last
summer, argued strenuously to keep information related to the Richard
Oland murder investigation confidential. (CBC)

Dennis Oland's lawyer urged New Brunswick's chief provincial court
judge, behind closed doors last summer, to keep information related to
his client and the Richard Oland murder investigation sealed.

Gary Miller argued there was already a "poison climate" against Dennis.

"I mean, this has been a media frenzy," he said during the Aug. 17,
2012 hearing, redacted copies of court transcripts made public on
Friday reveal.

He suggested the media coverage was becoming "tabloid journalism."

nb-si-dennisoldand-220

Police consider Dennis Oland, Richard Oland's son, the prime suspect
in the murder, court documents show.

"And there comes a time when a court can say, an innocent person can
stand up and say, 'Enough is enough.'"

Miller made the statements nine months before additional documents
were subsequently released, identifying Dennis, 45, as the prime
suspect in his father's murder.

Those documents suggested a possible financial motive. He owed his
father more than $500,000 and is described as being "on the edge
financially."

Richard Oland, 69, a prominent businessman, was found murdered in his
uptown Saint John office on July 7, 2011.

No charges have been laid, although Police Chief Bill Reid has said he
expects charges to be laid this year.

CBC News and Brunswick News have been fighting since late 2011 for the
release of as much information as possible related to the
investigation.

Halifax-based lawyer David Coles, who is representing the media
outlets, contends public scrutiny is key to ensuring the proper
administration of justice.
ns-si-richard-oland

Richard Oland, 69, was found dead in his Saint John office on July 7, 2011.

"In the darkness of secrecy, evil has full swing," he said in court on
Friday, in a bid to have closed-door testimony by the lead
investigator last summer made public.

Const. Stephen Davidson testified behind closed doors in order to be
able to speak freely about search warrants, which were sealed at the
time. But once those warrants were released, there was no longer a
justification to keep the testimony sealed, Coles argued.

Chief Judge R. Leslie Jackson agreed to release the transcripts with
some sections blacked out, which was uncontested by the Crown, Dennis'
lawyer, and Bill Teed, who is representing other members of the Oland
family.

"Therefore, the public, the media, should be able to read what [the
officer] said to understand the thinking of the police, their approach
to this case, what they've done, so that again, the public can form
its own opinion as to whether the police, the judges, the lawyers, are
doing their job properly, that this investigation is proceeding as it
should," Coles told reporters outside the courtroom.

"It's only by being an informed public that our democracy and the open
court principle make sense," he said.

http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/dennis-oland-found-guilty-of-second-degree-murder-in-death-of-father-1.2707063

http://www.unb.ca/saintjohn/arts/projects/crimepunishment/

Greg Marquis BA (St. Francis Xavier), MA (University of New
Brunswick), PhD (Queens)

Professor, Department of History and Politics
University of New Brunswick
P.O.Box 5050
Saint John, NB, Canada, E2L 4L5
Telephone (506) 648-5638

http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/episodes/2015-2016/the-dick-oland-case-murder-in-the-family

BROADCAST DATE : Feb 19, 2016
The Richard Oland Case: Murder in the Family

It was called the trial of the century in New Brunswick - - a
confluence of celebrity, money and murder. Richard Oland of the
Moosehead brewing family -- one of the richest, most powerful men in
the region – was dead, bludgeoned in his office. Charged and convicted
with the brutal killing, the victim’s son, Dennis Oland. Last week,
Dennis Oland was sentenced to life in prison with no chance of parole
for 10 years in the 2011 killing.

It’s a case where many felt family influence and clout would prevail.
Police were accused of fumbling the high-profile case and now there is
an appeal. Bob McKeown investigates a tangled family tale that ended
in murder – with many questions still unanswered.

Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission
Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to
close comments at any time.

David Amos | Logout

    13 Comments

David Amos
This comment is awaiting moderation by the site administrators.
Flag

So why doesn't the Fifth Estate or their lawyer buddies answer my
emails or return my phone calls over the past six years or so?

29 minutes ago 0 Likes

    Nargis Kheraj

At the 17 minute mark, CBC talks about Oland's posture - however,
there was no mention made of the fact that Oland had spoken to his
lawyer who had told him NOT to say anything more the police. Despite
that, the police continued to badger him. Oland could have left at any
time; however, he did not. He just did not answer any more questions
or respond to the badgering. By not reporting this properly, CBC has
implied that Oland was not cooperating with the police. This is
patently untrue!

    1 day ago 1 Like

    Miramichi Kid

Epic fumbling and the LAW abroad should never succumb to such humility.

    1 day ago 1 Like

    RealTruthSeeker

The Legal System in Canada can convict rich men who are not guilty as
it can concivt poor men who are also not guilty

    1 day ago 1 Like

    Ryan Nowlan

@RealTruthSeeker Explain to us how he is not guilty, even though
convicted by a jury of his peers... 3 month trial.. 30 hours
deliberation. This didn't happen over night.

    5 hours ago 0 Likes

    mrspock20099999

should not this show wait until the appeal is over?

    1 day ago 1 Like

    Mary McKenna

An additional point: I noticed Dennis Oland wearing a blue jacket in
the stores in the evening during surveillance tapes made after those
made in the parking lot of his fathers'office- peculiar.

    13 hours ago 0 Likes

    Mary McKenna

Couldn't believe the various psyche stripping, manipulative techniques
used in the police interview with Dennis Oland: seemed bizarre to hear
the interrogator repeatedly stating his presumption of guilt again &
again to someone who hadn't even been to trial. This ordeal appeared
designed merely to frazzle the suspect into confessing to just about
any crime in order to escape this inquisition. A weird "protocol"
indeed; and last Friday it was announced that a lawyer is not
permitted to attend... » more

    13 hours ago 0 Likes

    Mary Burnight

Clearly, there were 2 empty parking spaces available for Dennis' car
in his father's parking lot but a camera filmed him pulling in to a
more distant lot....I leave it to viewers to surmise why Dennis did
not want his parked car spotted too close to his father's office
during his third visit that evening of the brutal murder....

    23 hours ago 0 Likes

    sonnyone

Dennis Oland has to make his maker someday and for what he planned and
did for Richard, should spend his life in jail. Enough of this feeling
sorry for a killer.

    1 day ago 0 Likes

    Miramichi Kid

You would be worse off shooting a moose in off season.

    1 day ago 0 Likes

    Miramichi Kid

You would be worse off shooting a moose in off season.

Drink 'em not!

    1 day ago 0 Likes

    Chbc

This should be a really interesting episode.

    1 day ago 0 Likes

Submission Policy

Note: The CBC does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By
submitting your comments, you acknowledge that CBC has the right to
reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof
in any manner whatsoever. Please note that comments are moderated and
published according to our submission guidelines.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 19:56:37 -0400
Subject: Well your buddies in the CBC and the Justice Dept can never
deny that they were not informed before the big show begins EH Big Bad
Billy Casey and Rotten Ralphy Goodale?
To: alison.crawford@cbc.ca, garyamiller.gampc@gmail.com, fifth@cbc.ca,
info@alandgoldlaw.com, "ralph.goodale.a1"
, "roger.l.brown"
, warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
"Bill.Casey" , "jan.jensen"
, andrew ,
andrewjdouglas , sunrayzulu
, patrick_doran1 ,
"Paul.Lynch" , "Paul.Collister"
, paul , radical
, oldmaison , andre
, nmoore , "steve.murphy"
, "steve.roberge" ,
loyalistlaw , "Stephen.Horsman"
, "Stephane.vaillancourt"

Cc: David Amos

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Jensen, Jan"
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 23:46:56 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re Our calls Mr Teed please allow me to
inroduce you to Mr Brydon if the Oland's wish to hire a PI to check
the work of the Saint John PD I could assist Mr Brydon with no
conflict of interests
To: David Amos

I will be out of the office until Monday February 22, 2016 and I will
not be checking my voice mail or email during that time; if you
require immediate assistance, please contact my assistant, Tanya, at
902 426 8215.

On 2/19/16, David Amos wrote:

> Alan D. Gold
> Called to the bar: 1973 (ON)
> Gold, Alan D., Professional Corporation
> Ste. 210
> 20 Adelaide St. E.
> Toronto, Ontario M5C 2T6
> Phone: 416-368-1726
> Fax: 416-368-6811
> Email: info@alandgoldlaw.com
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/episodes/2015-2016/the-dick-oland-case-murder-in-the-family
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/dennis-oland-fifth-estate-1.3455007
>
>
> Dennis Oland's friends speak out over murder conviction
> CBC's the fifth estate is airing a new documentary that looks into
> Richard Oland's 2011 murder
>
> CBC News Posted: Feb 19, 2016 10:17 AM AT
>
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/rcmp-canadian-police-college-review-1.3453903
>
> Send anonymous tips directly to reporter Alison Crawford using
> securedrop.cbc.ca. She can also be reached at alison.crawford@cbc.ca.
>
> RCMP Sussex New Brunswick
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP °J" Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
> CLEARLY THE RCMP/GRC AND THE KPMG PALS DO NOT KNOW
> HOW TO READ LET ALONE COUNT BEANS EH?
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,
> John.Foran@gnb.ca, Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,
> "Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have n
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada and
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
> http://cpi-ac.ca/index.php/member-firms/nova-scotia
>
> Commissionaires Nova Scotia
> PO Box 2063
> Halifax, NS B3J 2Z1
> Phone: 902-429-8101
> Fax: 902-429-0592
>
> Email: bbrydon@commissionaires.ns.ca
> Website: http://www.commissionaires.ns.ca
>
> President Thomas McNulty
> Office: (506)-650-3971
> Email: president@cpi-ac.ca
>
> Secretary & Media
> Floyd Meunier
> Office: (506) 859-0484
> Cell: (506) 863-3265
> Fax: (506) 382-1470
> Email: secretary@cpi-ac.ca
>
> NEW BRUNSWICK VICE-PRESIDENT
> John Sabine
> Phone: 506-832-1894
> Email: nbvpa@cpi-ac.ca
>
> PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND VICE-PRESIDENT
> David MacDonald
> Office: (902) 892-9640
> Fax: (902) 892-7025
> Email:peipa@cpi-ac.ca
>
> ETHICS COMMITTEE
> Mike Gautreau
> Office: Office: (506)-866-8777
> Email: ethicschairman@cpi-ac.ca
>
> Hereto attached are some of documents that are before the Federal
> Court right now.
>
> The text of my filings can be found here.
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>
> Your lawyers will have to query the docket to see the CROWN's filing
> as they contain an amazing amount of desperate bullshit that I could
> not possibly scan.
>
> This was what was said in the past month before the court during oral
> arguments pertaining to Federal Court File no T-1557-15
>
> Dec 14th
> https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>
> Jan 11th
> https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>
>
> http://commissionaires.ns.ca/?page_id=236
>
> Deputy Commissioner Steve W. Graham,OOM, BA, MBA (Ret’d)
>
> Executive Committee
>
> D/Commr Graham is the former Deputy Commissioner East, responsible for
> RCMP services in the provinces of Ontario, Quebec and the Atlantic
> Provinces, retiring 8 June 2013 after 38 years service with the RCMP.
> Prior to this appointment, he was the Deputy Commissioner Atlantic
> Canada and Commanding Officer for Nova Scotia (“H” Division). He also
> has served as the Commanding Officer of New Brunswick (“J” Division)
> and Prince Edward (“L” Division). D/Commr Graham was selected to the
> CNS Board in January 2011.
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>
> 20. The Plaintiff states that the RCMP and the members of the FPF
> who harassed the Plaintiff in September of 2006 while he was a
> candidate in the NB provincial election would not explain why the NB
> Sergeant-at-Arms and the COC had barred him with a document written in
> English only or why it was not published in the Royal Gazette. Members
> of the FPF who violated the Plaintiff’s privacy trying to read an
> email that he was composing on a laptop within his car parked on
> private property refused to explain why they thought they had the
> right do so as they attempted to interrogate him without a warrant or
> due process of law. Members of the FPF refused to take the same
> documents the RCMP had so that their major crimes unit could finally
> investigate after they demanded that the Plaintiff identify himself so
> they could check for warrants for his arrest. The FPF would not
> discuss what they would do if he returned to the UNB campus or if he
> parked a vehicle and put money in a parking meter on the side of Queen
> Street claimed by the Sergeant-at-Arms. In February of 2007 after a
> Cabinet Minister of NB acknowledged his concerns with the RCMP, his
> children took pictures of the Plaintiff standing on the legislative
> property and the Sergeant-at-Arms and the FPF did nothing that day.
> However, the police harassment got worse afterwards. The FPF tried to
> call him a criminal while the Plaintiff waited for answers before he
> argued the Crown in court about his property that the FPF had
> illegally seized. The text of two emails that the Crown and the FPF
> sent in 2007 are as follows:
>
>               “Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>                From: "Murphy, Michael B. $DH/MS$" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>                To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>                Subject:
>
>                    January 30, 2007
>
>                    WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
>                    Mr. David Amos
>
>                    Dear Mr. Amos:
>
>                          This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of
> your e-mail of December
>                     29, 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
> Because of the
>                     nature of the allegations made in your message, I
> have taken the
>                     measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant
> Commissioner Steve Graham
>                     of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton .
>
>                    Sincerely,
>                    Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>                    Minister of Health”
>
>                                                        AND
>
>                 “From: “Lafleur, Lou” lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca
>                   To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com,
>                   Subject: Fredericton Police Force
>                   Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:21:13 -0300
>
>                          Dear Mr. Amos
>
>           My Name is Lou LaFleur and I am a Detective with the
> Fredericton Police Major Crime Unit. I would like to talk to you
> regarding files that I am investigating and that you are alleged to
> have involvement in.
>
>             Please call me at your earliest convenience and leave a
> message and a phone number on my secure and confidential line if I am
> not in my office.
>                          yours truly,
>
>                          Cpl. Lou LaFleur
>                          Fredericton Police Force
>                          311 Queen St.
>                          Fredericton, NB
>                          506-460-2332
>
> 21. The Plaintiff states that by September of 2007, he was told by
> police officers and others that he was barred from the town of
> Woodstock, the House of Commons, the National Capital District
> including Rideau Hall and the University of Ottawa, the Capital
> District of NB including the Lieutenant Governor’s residence and the
> University of NB, all other legislative properties in Canada and that
> a photograph of him was posted inside the NB legislative building, the
> Fredericton airport and at least one mining property guarded by the
> Corps of Commissionaires.
>
> 22. The Plaintiff states that on or about September 13, 2007 during a
> conversation with the office of the Speaker of the House of Commons he
> was referred to the Sergeant-at-Arms in order to find out if the
> Plaintiff was truly barred from the House of Commons and if he had
> been sent an answer to the documentation the Speaker and the
> government of Iceland received in May of 2006. The Sergeant-at-Arms
> was apparently well aware of his concerns because he said he knew the
> Plaintiff from a past life and quickly hung up the telephone. The
> Sergeant-at-Arms never did answer the Plaintiff and ignored all his
> contacts ever since.
>
> 23. The Plaintiff states that the odd response from Sergeant-at-Arms
> of the House of Commons caused him to research how they knew each
> other. The public record states that in June of 2005 the RCMP officer
> acting as Aide-de-Camp to the NB Lieutenant Governor retired and
> joined the House of Commons as Director of Security Operations. On
> September 1, 2006, he became the Sergeant-at-Arms of the House of
> Commons. Therefore, because of all three of his positions from June of
> 2004 to December of 2014, the Sergeant-at-Arms of the House of Commons
> must have agreed and seconded his fellow Sergeant-at-Arms in NB and
> his threats to arrest Plaintiff if he reappeared on parliamentary
> property.
>
> 24. The Plaintiff states that with regards to this complaint about
> being illegally barred from parliamentary properties, the most recent
> contact from the Crown was the three members of the RCMP who harassed
> the Plaintiff at 1:30 AM on December 16, 2014 not long after he had
> received an email from a former CSIS agent who is the current
> Sergeant-at-Arms of the legislative assembly of Alberta.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos
> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 12:53:56 -0400
> Subject: Re Our calls Mr Teed please allow me to inroduce you to Mr
> Brydon if the Oland's wish to hire a PI to check the work of the Saint
> John PD I could assist Mr Brydon with no conflict of interests
> To: wteed@coxandpalmer.com, bbrydon@commissionaires.ns.ca
> Cc: David Amos
>
> http://www.coxandpalmerlaw.com/en/home/lawyers/profile.aspx/wteed
>
> William H. Teed, QC
> Practice Areas
> Corporate & Commercial |Energy & Natural Resources |Real Estate
> |Securities & Corporate Finance | Partner
> Saint John
> Phone: (506) 633-2718
> Fax: (506) 632-8809
> Cell: (506) 647-8747
> wteed@coxandpalmer.com
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Britt Dysart
> Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 16:10:44 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Hey JP I just called RE "wondering if barred
> from all parliamentary properties in Canada" For the Public Record I
> did NOT email anyone between Dece 7th and Dec 17th 2015
> To: David Amos
>
> I am out of the City due to a death in the fanmily, returning January
> 20th.. If the matter is urgent, please contact my assistant, Sonja,
> at 506-443-9942, and she will re-direct your call.
>
> Otherwise, I will contact you upon my return. Thank you.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "McElman, Josh (NB)"
> Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 19:38:48 +0000
> Subject: RE: Re Federal Court File no T-1557-15 Josh I stand corrected
> about Paul Zed but look at Miller's address That said perhaps YOUR
> partner Stevey Boy May or Greg Byrne or Chief Justice J. Derek Green
> or former Lt Govs Ed Roberts and John Crosbie will explai
> To: David Amos , "May, Steve (St. John's)"
> , "Roberts, Edward (St. John's)"
> , Ches Crosbie ,
> "greg.byrne"
> Cc: David Amos , "Cooper, George L.
> (Moncton)"
>
> Dear Sir:
>
> Thank you for your correspondence. As we are not your counsel or
> involved in a matter with you we will not be able to continue
> corresponding.   I will be deleting the email you just sent and any
> other correspondence without reviewing same.
>
> Regards
> Josh
>
> Josh J.B. McElman* | Cox & Palmer | Partner
>
> Saint John Direct 506 633 2708 Fax 506 632 8809 Web
> coxandpalmerlaw.com
> Address Brunswick Square Suite 1500 1 Germain Street Saint John NB
> *Practising through Josh McElman Professional Corporation
>
> This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is confidential
> and may be privileged. Any unauthorized distribution or disclosure is
> prohibited. Disclosure to anyone other than the intended recipient
> does not constitute waiver of privilege. If you have received this
> e-mail in error, please notify us and delete it and any attachments
> from your computer system and records.
> -----------------------------------
> Ce courriel (y compris les pièces jointes) est confidentiel et peut
> être privilégié. La distribution ou la divulgation non autorisée de
> ce courriel est interdite. Sa divulgation à toute personne autre que
> son destinataire ne constitue pas une renonciation de privilège. Si
> vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez nous aviser et
> éliminer ce courriel, ainsi que les pièces jointes, de votre système
> informatique et de vos dossiers.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
> Sent: January 7, 2016 3:35 PM
> To: McElman, Josh (NB) ; May, Steve (St.
> John's) ; Roberts, Edward (St. John's)
> ; Ches Crosbie ;
> greg.byrne
> Cc: David Amos ; Cooper, George L.
> (Moncton)
> Subject: Re Federal Court File no T-1557-15 Josh I stand corrected
> about Paul Zed but look at Miller's address That said perhaps YOUR
> partner Stevey Boy May or Greg Byrne or Chief Justice J. Derek Green
> or former Lt Govs Ed Roberts and John Crosbie will explain...
>
> Stephen J. May Partner
> St. John's
> Phone: (709) 570-5528
> Fax: (709) 570-5748
> Cell: (709) 687-7000
> smay@coxandpalmer.com
>
> Josh J.B. McElman Partner
> Saint John
> Phone: (506) 633-2708
> Fax: (506) 632-8809
> Cell: (506) 333-8800
> jmcelman@coxandpalmer.com
>
>
> The Honourable Edward Roberts, CM, ONL, QC Counsel St. John's
> Phone: (709) 570-5501
> Fax: (709) 570-5757
> eroberts@coxandpalmer.com
>
> 2005 01 T 0010
>
> IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR TRIAL DIVISION
> BETWEEN:
>
> WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF
> AND:
> BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT
>
> AND BETWEEN:
> BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT/PLAINTIFF
> BY COUNTERCLAIM
>
> AND: WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF/FIRST DEFENDANT BY COUNTERCLAIM
>
> AND: T. ALEX HICKMAN SECOND DEFENDANT
> BY COUNTERCLAIM
>
> AND: THOMAS MARSHALL THIRD DEFENDANT
> BY COUNTERCLAIM
>
> AND: DANNY WILLIAMS FOURTH DEFENDANT
> BY COUNTERCLAIM
>
> AND: EDWARD M. ROBERTS FIFTH DEFENDANT
> BY COUNTERCLAIM
>
> AND: JOHN CROSBIE SIXTH DEFENDANT
> BY COUNTERCLAIM
>
> AND: PATTERSON PALMER SEVENTH DEFENDANT
> BY COUNTERCLAIM
>
> SUMMARY OF CURRENT DOCUMENT
>
> Court File Number(s):2005 01 T 0010
>
> Date of Filing of Document: 25 January 2005
>
> Name of Filing Party or Person: Stephen J. May
>
> Application to which Document being filed relates: Amended Application
> of the Plaintiff/Defendant by Counterclaim to maintain an Order
> restricting publication, to strike portions of the Statement of
> Defence, strike the Counterclaim in it's entirety, and to refer this
> proceeding to case management.
>
> Statement of purpose in filing: To maintain an Order restricting
> publication, to strike portions of the Statement of Defence, strike
> the Counterclaim in its entirety and refer this proceeding to case
> management.
>
> A F F I D A V I T
>
> I, Stephen J. May, of the City of St. John's, in the Province of
> Newfoundland and Labrador, Barrister and Solicitor, make oath and say
> as follows:
>
> THAT I am a Partner in the St. John's office of PATTERSON PALMER
> solicitors for William Matthews, the Member of Parliament for
> Random-Burin-St. George's in the Parliament of Canada.
>
> THAT Mr. Matthews originally retained Mr. Edward Roberts, Q.C. on or
> about 30 April 2002 after Mr. Byron Prior, the Defendant/Plaintiff by
> Counterclaim, had made allegations against Mr. Matthews in a
> publication called "My Inheritance - The truth - Not Fiction: A Town
> with a Secret". In that publication, the allegation was made that Mr.
> Matthews had had sex with a girl who had been prostituted by her
> mother. That girl was alleged to have been Mr. Prior's sister.
>
> THAT upon being retained, Mr. Edward Roberts wrote a letter to Mr.
> Prior. That letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit "1" to my Affidavit.
>
> THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts' letter to Mr. Prior, Mr. Roberts
> received a 1 May 2002 e-mail from Mr. Prior. That e-mail is attached
> as Exhibit "2".
>
> THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts receipt of the e-mail, Mr. Prior swore
> an Affidavit acknowledging that what had been said in that publication
> was false. That Affidavit is attached as Exhibit "3" to my Affidavit.
> Following Mr. Roberts' receipt of that Affidavit, Mr. Matthews advised
> that he was satisfied not to pursue the matter any further and our
> firm closed our file.
>
> THAT on or about 25 October 2004, I was retained by Mr. Matthews
> following his gaining knowledge that a web site, made a series of
> allegations against him relating to my having sex with a girl of
> approximately 12 years old through to an approximate age of 15 years
> old. It also accused him of being a father of one of her children and
> accused him of having raped that girl. Upon checking the web site I
> saw that Byron Prior, the Defendant, had been identified as the author
> of the material on the site.
>
> THAT Mr. Matthews instructed me to write Mr. Prior, to remind him of
> the fact that the allegations had been admitted to being false through
> a 16 May 2002 Affidavit to advise him of Mr. Matthews' intentions to
> commence legal proceedings if the comments were not removed from the
> web site. A copy of my letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit "4"
> to this Affidavit.
>
> THAT I attach as Exhibit "5" a transcript from a 5 November 2004
> voicemail left by David Amos, identified in the voicemail as a friend
> of Mr. Prior.
>
> THAT I attach as Exhibit "6" a portion of a 6 November 2004 e-mail
> from Mr. Amos.
>
> THAT until I received his voicemail and e-mail, I had never heard of Mr.
> Amos.
>
> THAT Mr. Amos has continued to send me e-mail since his 5 November
> e-mail. Including his 6 November 2004 e-mail, I have received a total
> of 15 e-mails as of 23 January 2005. All do not address Mr. Matthews'
> claim or my involvement as Mr. Matthews' solicitor. I attach as
> Exhibit "7" a portion of a 12 January 2005 e-mail that Mr. Amos sent
> to me but originally came to my attention through Ms. Lois Skanes
> whose firm had received a copy. This e-mail followed the service of
> the Statement of Claim on 11 January 2005 on Mr. Prior. I also attach
> as Exhibit "8" a copy of a 19 January 2005 e-mail from Mr. Amos.
>
> THAT I attach as Exhibit "9" a copy of a 22 November 2004 letter
> addressed to me from Edward Roberts, the Lieutenant Governor of
> Newfoundland and Labrador covering a 2 September 2004 letter from Mr.
> Amos addressed to John Crosbie, Edward Roberts, in his capacity as
> Lieutenant Governor, Danny Williams, in his capacity as Premier of
> Newfoundland and Labrador, and Brian F. Furey, President of the Law
> Society of Newfoundland and Labrador. I requested a copy of this
> letter from Government House after asking Mr. Roberts if he had
> received any correspondence from Mr. Amos during his previous
> representation of Mr. Matthews. He advised me that he received a
> letter since becoming Lieutenant Governor, portions of which involved
> his representation of Mr. Matthews. Mr. Roberts' letter also covered
> his reply to Mr. Amos.
>
> THAT I attach as Exhibit "10" an e-mail from Mr. Amos received on
> Sunday, 23 January 2005.
>
> THAT I swear this Affidavit in support of the Application to strike
> Mr. Prior's counterclaim.
>
> SWORN to before me at
> St. John's, Province of Newfoundland and Labrador this 24th day of
> January, 2005.
>
> Signed by Della Hart
> STEPHEN J. MAY
> Signature STAMP
> DELLA HART
> A Commissioner for Oaths in and for
> the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador. My commission expires on
> December 31, 2009
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos
> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 11:38:08 -0400
> Subject: I just called your cell (613) 220-2007 Re Speaker of the
> House Geoff Regan My number is 902 800 0369
> To: pvandusen@cpac.ca
> Cc: David Amos
>
> http://www.cpac.ca/en/programs/cpac-special/episodes/46467628/
>
> CPAC Special - Peter Van Dusen with Geoff Regan
>
> CPAC's Peter Van Dusen talks to newly elected Speaker of the House
> Geoff Regan about his new role and responsibilities. December 9
>
>
> From: SpkrOff@parl.gc.ca
> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 11:51 AM
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> Subject: wondering if barred from all parliamentary properties in Canada
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> Please find attached a letter signed from the Speaker of the House of
> Commons in response to your electronic message dated December 11,
> 2015.
>
> Nicole Beaudin
>
> Correspondence and Finance Officer, Speaker's Office/
>
> Agent des finances et de la correspondance, La Présidence
>
> Room 328-N, Centre Block/Pièce 328-N édifice du Centre
>
> Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6
>
> Tel.: 613-996-0630
>
>
> For the Public Record I did NOT email anyone between Dec 7th and Dec
> 17th 2015. I could not even if I wanted to because I was nowhere near
> an Internet connection before and after I apeared in Federal Court on
> December 14th. Howver I did post comments within CBC's website before
> and after Regan was elected Speaker. One comment was deleted and the
> other I believe still stands today.
>
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/parliament-opens-speaker-election-1.3348640
>
> Geoff Regan elected House Speaker as 42nd Parliament opens
> MPs voted in a secret ballot, ranking the candidates by order of preference
>
> By Susana Mas, CBC News Posted: Dec 03, 2015 10:07 AM ET Last Updated:
> Dec 03, 2015 10:01 PM ET
>
> TWO comments in particular
>
> Tenrager
> @David Amos Your prediction was wrong, the rest is gibberish.
> 1 month ago 1 Like
>
>
> David Amos
> @Tenrager ROUND TWO If it was gibberish WHY did the CROWN Corp known
> as CBC delete it ???
>
> FYI Here is what I sent when I was wrong BTW You and CBC can bet that
> I saved this webpage as well. N'esy Pas?
>
> Trust that I don't mind being wrong about the choice of Speaker after
> listening to the Senate reform plans I say WOW just like Geoff Regan
> did when he commented that he was the first Speaker from the Maritimes
> in nearly 100 years
> Cc: Denis.Paradis@parl.gc.ca, Yasmin.Ratansi@parl.gc.ca,
> bruce.stanton@parl.gc.ca, geoff@geoffregan.ca, geoff.regan@parl.gc.ca,
> speakers.office@parliament.govt.nz, justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca,
> MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, stephen.harper@parl.gc.ca,
> andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, etc
>
> Now everybody should view the three pdf files hereto attached. Clearly
> my letters and many supporting documents were answered. More
> importantly the Librano lawyer Joe Day should not deny that the brand
> new Speaker Geoff Regan got the same pile of documents in 2004 while
> he oversaw the Arar Inquiry on behalf of his old lawyer buddy Irwin
> Cotler CORRECT?
>
> Now I get to ask the important question to the brand new Speaker
> before I file my next pile of documents in Federal Court (which will
> obviously include the three attachments)
>
> So Mr Speaker Geoff Regan am I sill barred from all Parliamentary
> Properties in Canada or am I not???
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> Fundy Royal, New Brunswick Debate – Federal Elections 2015 - The Local
> Campaign, Rogers TV
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cFOKT6TlSE
>
> Me and Louis Riel versus the RCMP
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAoN09eaxuo
>
> The dog in blue coat versus Gandalf
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyNx6QEHqRA
> 1 month ago 1 Like
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos
> Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:15:03 -0400
> Subject: Re: Re Federal Court Rule 46 (1) (a) (viii) as it applies to
> my complaint (File No: T-1557-15) Trust that I called and tried to
> talk a lot bureaucrats and politicians etc before sharing the hearings
> held on Dec 14th and Jan 11th
> To: david.mcguinty@parl.gc.ca
> Cc: David Amos
>
> Thank you for being ethical.
>
> Best Regards
> Dave
>
> On 1/15/16, david.mcguinty@parl.gc.ca wrote:
>> Received. Thank you.
>> ________________________________________
>> From: David Amos
>> Sent: January 15, 2016 2:22 PM
>> To: McGuinty, David - M.P.; McKay, John - M.P.; Long, Wayne - Riding 1;
>> McKenna, Catherine - M.P.; McCrimmon, Karen - Riding 1; Ludwig, Karen -
>> Riding 2; karen.ludwig.nb; MacKinnon, Steven - Député
>> Cc: David Amos
>> Subject: Fwd: Re Federal Court Rule 46 (1) (a) (viii) as it applies to my
>> complaint (File No: T-1557-15) Trust that I called and tried to talk a
>> lot
>> bureaucrats and politicians etc before sharing the hearings held on Dec
>> 14th
>> and Jan 11th
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos
>> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 16:29:14 -0400
>> Subject: Re Federal Court Rule 46 (1) (a) (viii) as it applies to my
>> complaint (File No: T-1557-15) Trust that I called and tried to talk a
>> lot bureaucrats and politicians etc before sharing the hearings held
>> on Dec 14th and Jan 11th
>> To: Rheal.Fortin.c1@parl.gc.ca, Murray.Rankin.c1@parl.gc.ca,
>> cmunroe@glgmlaw.com, nbd_cna@liberal.ca, pm ,
>> ljulien@liberal.ca, pmilliken , bdysart
>> , bdysart ,
>> Braeden.Caley@vancouver.ca, robert.m.schuett@schuettlaw.com,
>> jda@nf.aibn.com, eclark@coxandpalmer.com, office@liberal.ns.ca,
>> president@lpco.ca, david@lpcm.ca, emerchant
>> , info@fja-cmf.gc.ca, w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca,
>> richard.tardif@cas-satj.gc.ca, "andrew.scheer"
>> , john.wallace@sen.parl.gc.ca, MulcaT
>> , "rona.ambrose.A1" ,
>> RBauer , sshimshak@paulweiss.com,
>> cspada@lswlaw.com, msmith , bginsberg
>> , "gregory.craig"
>> , "Gilles.Blinn"
>> , "bob.paulson"
>> , "bob.rae"
>> , "Gilles.Moreau"
>> , "Stephane.vaillancourt"
>>
>> Cc: David Amos ,
>> Chantal.Carbonneau@cas-satj.gc.ca, daniel.gosselin@cas-satj.gc.ca,
>> assistance@liberal.ca, Karine Fortin , "stephen.harper"
>> , heather.bradley@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Anyway at least nobody said I could not so enjoy.
>>
>> Judge Bell Dec 14th
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>>
>> Judge Southcott Jan 11th
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>>
>>
>> Federal Court Rule
>>
>> 46 (1) Subject to the approval of the Governor in Council and subject
>> also to subsection (4), the rules committee may make general rules and
>> orders
>>
>> (a) for regulating the practice and procedure in the Federal Court of
>> Appeal and in the Federal Court, including, without restricting the
>> generality of the foregoing,
>>
>> (viii) rules governing the recording of proceedings in the course of a
>> hearing and the transcription of that recording,
>>
>>
>> FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
>>
>> OTTAWA, January 7, 2016
>>
>> In response to recent media reports regarding the application of Order
>> in Council PC 2015-1071, the Chief Administrator of the Courts
>> Administration Service (CAS) is releasing the following statement on
>> behalf of the Chief Justices of the Federal Court of Appeal, the
>> Federal Court, the Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada and the Tax
>> Court of Canada:
>>
>> The Chief Justices share the position conveyed today by the Chief
>> Justice of Canada. They are also encouraged by the federal
>> government’s response to their concerns about the impact of this Order
>> in Council on judicial independence and are expecting a satisfactory
>> resolution of the issue shortly.
>>
>> For further information contact:
>> Richard Tardif
>> Deputy Chief Administrator
>> Judicial and Registry Services
>> Courts Administration Service
>> richard.tardif@cas-satj.gc.ca
>> Tel: 613-943-3458
>>
>> http://goc411.ca/Employees/IndexByDepartment/58
>>
>> Daniel Gosselin
>> Chief Administrator:
>> Courts Administration Service
>> Principal Office
>> 90 Sparks St.
>> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H9
>> Phone: 613-996-4778
>> Fax: 613-941-6197
>> Email: daniel.gosselin@cas-satj.gc.ca
>>
>> The clerks above did not have the sand to call me back but the lawyer
>> below certainly did. I hung up on her the instant she told me
>> everybody was too busy
>> to bother talking to me.
>>
>> http://goc411.ca/60585/Lise-Henrie
>>
>> Lise Henrie
>> Executive Directer and General Counsel
>> 613-943-5484
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Cmunroe (Liberal / Assistance)"
> Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 19:28:25 +0000
> Subject: Re: Attn Dr. John Gillis Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15
> Trust that I called and tried to reason with a lot of Liberals begore
> I am before the cour...
> To: Motomaniac333
>
> RealChange.ca | DuVraiChangement.ca
>
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Cmunroe, Jan 6, 14:28
>
> Hello all,
>
> I would ask that you please do not respond to this e-mail (in the
> event that you were inclined to do so.)
>
> Let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
>
> Regards,
>
> Craig Munroe
> (Party Legal and Constitutional Advisor)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 11:09 AM
> To: Craig Munroe ; nbd_cna@liberal.ca; pm
> ; ljulien@liberal.ca; pmilliken ;
> bdysart ; bdysart ;
> Braeden.Caley@vancouver.ca; robert.m.schuett@schuettlaw.com;
> jda@nf.aibn.com; eclark@coxandpalmer.com; office@liberal.ns.ca;
> president@lpco.ca; david@lpcm.ca; emerchant@merchantlaw.com
> Cc: David Amos ; assistance@liberal.ca;
> Karine Fortin ; stephen.harper
>
> Subject: Re: Attn Dr. John Gillis Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15
> Trust that I called and tried to reason with a lot of Liberals begore
> I am before the court again on Monday Jan 11th
>
> On 1/6/16, David Amos wrote:
>> BTW the nice guys who talked to me and didn't dismiss me I put in the
>> BCC line
>>
>> Dr. John Gillis
>> P.O. Box 723
>> 5151 George Street, Suite 1400
>> Halifax, Nova Scotia
>> Canada B3J 2T3
>> Tel: (902) 429-1993
>> Email: office@liberal.ns.ca
>>
>> John Allan, President
>> Liberal Party of Newfoundland & Labrador
>> T: (709) 685-1230
>> jda@nf.aibn.com
>>
>>
>> Braeden Caley
>> Office of the Mayor, City of Vancouver
>> 604-809-9951
>> Braeden.Caley@vancouver.ca,
>>
>>
>> Britt Dysart QC
>> Suite 600, Frederick Square
>> 77 Westmorland Street
>> P.O. Box 730
>> Fredericton, NB, Canada
>> E3B 5B4
>>
>> P 506.443.0153
>> F 506.443.9948
>>
>>
>> Evatt F. A. Merchant
>> Merchant Law Group LLP
>> First Nations Bank Bldg.
>> 501-224 4th Ave. S.
>> Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7K 5M5
>> Phone: 306-653-7777
>> Email: emerchant@merchantlaw.com
>>
>>
>> Ewan W. Clark
>> Montague
>> Phone: (902) 838-5275
>> Fax: (902) 838-3440
>> eclark@coxandpalmer.com
>>
>> Robert M. Schuett
>> #200, 602 11th Avenue SW
>> Calgary Alberta T2R 1J8
>> Phone: (403) 705-1261
>> Fax: (403) 705-1265
>> robert.m.schuett@schuettlaw.com
>>
>>
>> http://www.liberal.ca/national-board-of-directors/
>>
>> Who are we?
>>
>> We are volunteers from across the country who care passionately about
>> Canada’s future and promoting Liberal values. We are community
>> leaders, parents, and professionals who volunteer our time in this
>> role. The board works together to provide oversight and guidance to
>> the Party in matters both fiduciary, and strategic. We meet regularly
>> in person and by phone with the objective of ensuring the Party is
>> prepared for the next federal election. It is an honour to work with
>> such a distinct and talented group of individuals. Please don’t
>> hesitate to reach out to us at nbd_cna@liberal.ca.
>> Anna Gainey
>>
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada
>>
>> T @annamgainey
>> Leader        Justin Trudeau
>> National President    Anna Gainey
>> Acting National Director      Christina Topp
>> National Vice-President (English)     Chris MacInnes
>> National Vice-President (French)      Marie Tremblay
>> National Policy Chair         Maryanne Kampouris
>> National Membership Secretary         Leanne Bourassa
>> Past National President       Mike Crawley
>> President, Liberal Party of Newfoundland & Labrador   John Allan
>> President, Liberal Party of Prince Edward Island      Ewan Clark
>> President, Nova Scotia Liberal Party John Gillis
>> President, New Brunswick Liberal Association Britt Dysart
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Québec)   Linda Julien
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Ontario) Tyler Banham
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Manitoba)         Sachit Mehra
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Saskatchewan)     Evatt Merchant
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Alberta) Robbie Schuett
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (British Columbia)         Braeden
>> Caley
>> President, Federal Liberal Association of Yukon       Blake Rogers
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Northwest Territories)    Rosanna
>> Nicol
>> President, Federal Liberal Association of Nunavut     Michel Potvin
>> Caucus Representative         Francis Scarpaleggia
>> Co-Chair, Aboriginal Peoples’ Commission (Female)     Caitlin Tolley
>> Co-Chair, Aboriginal Peoples’ Commission (Male)       Kevin Seesequasis
>> President, National Women’s Liberal Commission        Carlene Variyan
>> President, Young Liberals of Canada   Justin Kaiser
>> Co-Chair, Senior Liberals’ Commission (French)        Anne Adams
>> Co-Chair, Senior Liberals’ Commission (English)       Kenneth D. Halliday
>> Chair, Council of Presidents Veena Bhullar
>> Chief Financial Officer       Chuck Rifici
>> Chief Revenue Officer         Stephen Bronfman
>> CEO, Federal Liberal Agency of Canada         Mike Eizenga
>> National Campaign Co-Chair    Katie Telford
>> Constitutional and Legal Adviser (English)    Craig Munroe
>> Constitutional and Legal Adviser (French)     Elise Bartlett
>>
>> Craig T. Munroe, Partner
>> Email: cmunroe@glgmlaw.com
>> Phone: (604) 891-1176
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos
>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 19:32:00 -0400
>> Subject: Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15 the CBC, the RCMP, their
>> new boss Justin Trudeau and his Ministers of Justice and Defence etc
>> cannot deny their knowledge of Paragraphs 81, 82, 83, 84, and 85 now
>> CORRECT G$?
>> To: Paul.Samyn@freepress.mb.ca, "carolyn.bennett"
>> , Doug@dougeyolfson.ca,
>> doug.eyolfson@parl.gc.ca, fpcity@freepress.mb.ca,
>> w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca, "Paul.Lynch" ,
>> "Marianne.Ryan" , sunrayzulu
>> , mcu , dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca,
>> "john.green" , chiefape
>> Cc: David Amos , gopublic
>> , oldmaison , radical
>> , newsonline ,
>> newsroom , nmoore ,
>> andre
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.
>> html
>>
>> David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15
>>
>> 81. The Plaintiff states that matters of harassment that the police
>> refuse to investigate would have entered the realm of ridiculous in
>> 2012 if the reasons behind the suicides of teenagers did not become
>> well known by the corporate media. In the summer of 2012 a new member
>> of the FPS who as a former member of the EPS had inspired a lawsuit
>> for beating a client in Edmonton called the Plaintiff and accused him
>> of something he could not do even if he wanted to while he was arguing
>> many lawyers byway of emails about a matter concerning cyber stalking
>> that was before the SCC. The member of the FPF accused the Plaintiff
>> of calling the boss of Bullying Canada thirty times. At that time his
>> MagicJack account had been hacked and although he could receive
>> incoming calls, the Plaintiff could not call out to anyone. The
>> Plaintiff freely sent the FPF his telephone logs sourced from
>> MagicJack after his account restored without the Crown having to issue
>> a warrant to see his telephone records. He asked the FPF and the RCMP
>> where did the records of his phone calls to and from the FPF and the
>> RCMP go if his account had not been hacked. The police never
>> responded. Years later a Troll sent Dean Roger Ray a message through
>> YouTube providing info about the Plaintiff’s MagicJack account with
>> the correct password. Dean Roger Ray promptly posted two videos in
>> YouTube clearly displaying the blatant violation of privacy likely to
>> protect himself from the crime. The Plaintiff quickly pointed out the
>> videos to the RCMP and they refused to investigate as usual. At about
>> the same point in time the Plaintiff noticed that the CBC had
>> published a record of a access to information requests. On the list of
>> requests he saw his name along with several employees of CBC and the
>> boss of Bullying Canada. The Plaintiff called the CBC to make
>> inquiries about what he saw published on the Internet. CBC told him it
>> was none of his business and advised him if he thought his rights had
>> been offended to file a complaint. It appears the Plaintiff that
>> employees of CBC like other questionable Crown Corporations such as
>> the RCMP rely on their attorneys far too much to defend them from
>> litigation they invite from citizens they purportedly serve. The
>> employees of CBC named within the aforementioned and the CBC Legal
>> Dept. are very familiar with the Plaintiff and of the Crown barring
>> him from legislative properties while he running for public office.
>>
>> 82. The Plaintiff states that any politician or police officer should
>> have seen enough of Barry Winter’s WordPress blog by June 22, 2015
>> particularly after the very unnecessary demise of two men in Alberta
>> because of the incompetence of the EPS. Barry Winters was blogging
>> about the EPS using battering ram in order to execute a warrant for a
>> 250 dollar bylaw offence at the same time Professor Kris Wells
>> revealed in a televised interview that the EPS member who was killed
>> was the one investigating the cyber harassment of him. It was obvious
>> why the police and politicians ignored all the death threats, sexual
>> harassment, cyberbullying and hate speech of a proud Zionist who
>> claimed to be a former CF officer who now working for the Department
>> of National Defence (DND). It is well known that no politician in
>> Canada is allowed to sit in Parliament as a member of the major
>> parties unless they support Israel. Since 2002 the Plaintiff made it
>> well known that he does not support Israeli actions and was against
>> the American plan to make war on Iraq. On Aril 1, 2003 within two
>> weeks of the beginning of the War on Iraq, the US Secret Service
>> threatened to practice extraordinary rendition because false
>> allegations of a Presidential threat were made against him by an
>> American court. However, the Americans and the Crown cannot deny that
>> what he said in two courts on April 1, 2003 because he published the
>> recordings of what was truly said as soon as he got the court tapes.
>> The RCMP knows those words can still be heard on the Internet today.
>> In 2009, the Plaintiff began to complain of Barry Winters about
>> something far more important to Canada as nation because of Winters’
>> bragging of being one of 24 CF officers who assisted the Americans in
>> the planning the War on Iraq in 2002. In the Plaintiff’s humble
>> opinion the mandate of the DND is Defence not Attack. He is not so
>> naive to think that such plans of war do not occur but if Barry
>> Winters was in fact one of the CF officers who did so then he broke
>> his oath to the Crown the instant he bragged of it in his blog. If
>> Winters was never an officer in the CF then he broke the law by
>> impersonating an officer. The Plaintiff downloaded the emails of the
>> Privy Council about Wikileaks. The bragging of Barry Winters should
>> have been investigated in 2009 before CBC reported that documents
>> released by WikiLeaks supported his information about Canadian
>> involvement in the War on Iraq.
>>
>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>
>> January 13, 2015
>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>
>> December 8, 2014
>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>
>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>
>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>
>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>> campaign of 2006.
>>
>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>
>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>
>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>
>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>> essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An
>> ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear
>> and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,”
>> or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of
>> terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states
>> “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of
>> Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an
>> ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the
>> Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
>>
>> One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty
>> was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the
>> amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time
>> denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time
>> self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of
>> “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the
>> G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious
>> behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister
>> Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully
>> cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits
>> are not.
>>
>> Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal
>> mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the
>> world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy”
>> David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security
>> and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can
>> and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing
>> “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war
>> criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending
>> tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
>>
>> In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
>> “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
>> successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing,
>> marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian
>> military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern
>> equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are
>> antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five
>> years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that
>> won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
>>
>> My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
>> Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin
>> Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not
>> served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social
>> democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and
>> other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet
>> these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to
>> other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
>>
>> Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security,
>> and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before
>> shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
>>
>> Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now
>>
>> From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
>> Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and
>> the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still
>> alive
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
>> your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply
>> to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos
>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
>> Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the
>> War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
>> To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil,
>> Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, john.adams@cse-cst.gc.ca,
>> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, stoffp1 ,
>> dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca,
>> milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca,
>> sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir , smari
>> , greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm ,
>> susan@blueskystrategygroup.com, Don@blueskystrategygroup.com,
>> eugene@blueskystrategygroup.com, americas@aljazeera.net
>> Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice" , "terry.seguin"
>> , acampbell , whistleblower
>>
>>
>> I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David
>> Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's
>> Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on
>> CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To
>> be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested
>> that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise
>> if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else
>> about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact that your
>> old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English
>> never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is
>> interesting though
>>
>> http://www.blueskystrategygroup.com/index.php/team/don-newman/
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/media/story/2010/05/04/al-jazeera-english-
>> launch.html
>>
>> Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
>> this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
>> Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad
>> Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
>>
>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
>>
>> The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a
>> shy political animal
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>> Enjoy Mr Weston
>> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/news/story/2011/05/15/weston-iraq-invasion-w
>> ikileaks.html
>>
>> "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
>> brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
>> says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
>> to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
>> including a Canadian general.
>>
>> That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
>> who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
>> U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was
>> also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
>> prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
>>
>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2010/06/canada-and-united-states.html
>>
>> "I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
>> being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
>> demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
>> "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
>> into the US policy.
>>
>> At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
>> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
>> in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
>> report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was
>> never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
>> were deployed WMD.
>>
>> Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
>> invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
>> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
>> (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
>> about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
>> that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
>> authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
>>
>> There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
>> its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
>> to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
>> folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
>> upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions
>> are to met before US troop can redeploy? Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of
>> Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them
>> correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the
>> George W Bush administration was onerous
>>
>> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
>> military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
>> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
>> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
>> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
>> operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
>> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
>> ....not necessarily in that order. "
>>
>> You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
>> Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
>>
>> http://www.socom.mil/SOCOMHome/Pages/ContactUSSOCOM.aspx
>>
>>
>> 84. The Plaintiff states that the RCMP is well aware that he went to
>> western Canada in 2104 at the invitation of a fellow Maritimer in
>> order to assist in his attempt to investigate the murders of many
>> people in Northern BC. The Plaintiff has good reasons to doubt his
>> fellow Maritimer’s motives. The fact that he did not tell the
>> Plaintiff until he had arrived in BC that he had invited a Neo Nazi he
>> knew the Plaintiff strongly disliked to the same protest that he was
>> staging in front of the court house in Prince George on August 21,
>> 2014. The Plaintiff was looking forward to meeting Lonnie Landrud so
>> he ignored the Neo Nazi. Several months after their one and only
>> meeting, Lonnie Landrud contacted the Plaintiff and asked him to
>> publish a statement of his on the Internet and to forward it to anyone
>> he wished. The Plaintiff obliged Landrud and did an investigation of
>> his own as well. He has informed the RCMP of his opinion of their
>> actions and has done nothing further except monitor the criminal
>> proceedings the Crown has placed against the Neo Nazi in BC and save
>> his videos and webpages and that of his associates. The words the
>> Plaintiff stated in public in Prince George BC on August 21, 2014 were
>> recorded by the Neo Nazi and published on the Internet and the RCMP
>> knows the Plaintiff stands by every word. For the public record the
>> Plaintiff truly believes what Lonnie Landrud told him despite the fact
>> that he does not trust his Neo Nazi associates. Therefore the
>> Plaintiff had no ethical dilemma whatsoever in publishing the
>> statement Lonnie Landrud mailed to him in a sincere effort to assist
>> Lonnie Landrud’s pursuit of justice. The Crown is well aware that
>> Plaintiff’s former lawyer, Barry Bachrach once had a leader of the
>> American Indian Movement for a client and that is why he ran against
>> the former Minister of Indian Affairs for his seat in the 39th
>> Parliament.
>>
>> 85. The Plaintiff states that while he was out west he visited
>> Edmonton AB several times and met many people. He visited the home of
>> Barry Winters and all his favourite haunts in the hope of meeting in
>> person the evil person who had been sexually harassing and threatening
>> to kill him and his children for many years. The Crown cannot deny
>> that Winters invited him many times. On June 13, 2015 Barry Winters
>> admitted the EPS warned him the Plaintiff was looking for him.
>>
>> On 12/21/15, David Amos wrote:
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Rabson, Mia"
>>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 20:45:36 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Wab Kinew
>>> To: David Amos
>>>
>>> I will be out of the office until Monday, January 4.
>>> If you need immediate assistance please contact our city desk at 613
>>> 697 7292 or fpcity@freepress.mb.ca.
>>> Happy Holidays!
>>>
>>> Mia Rabson
>>> Parliamentary Bureau Chief
>>> Winnipeg Free Press
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Sarra R. Deane"
>>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 20:10:12 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Wab Kinew
>>> To: David Amos
>>>
>>> I will be out of the office until Thursday, Nov. 12th. I will
>>> respond to emails upon my return. Miigwech and all the best.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos
>>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:45:29 -0400
>>> Subject: Fwd: Attn Wab Kinew
>>> To: mia.rabson@freepress.mb.ca, Paul.Samyn@freepress.mb.ca,
>>> "carolyn.bennett" , Doug@dougeyolfson.ca,
>>> doug.eyolfson@parl.gc.ca
>>> Cc: David Amos
>>>
>>> http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/peacemaker-363019331.html
>>>
>>> Peacemaker
>>> Group pushes for Truth and Reconciliation chairman to get Nobel Prize
>>>
>>> By: Mia Rabson
>>> Posted: 12/19/2015 3:00 AM   | Last Modified: 12/19/2015 6:12 AM
>>>
>>> " Murray Sinclair already has an impressive resumé.
>>>
>>> He's the first aboriginal judge appointed to the bench in Manitoba,
>>> co-commissioner of the Aboriginal Justice Inquiry and chairman of the
>>> Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
>>>
>>> But if a group of Canadians has its way, he will get one of the
>>> highest honours in the world to add to the list: Nobel Peace Prize
>>> recipient.
>>>
>>> "He and Phil Fontaine should share a Nobel Peace Prize," said Wab
>>> Kinew, associate vice-president for indigenous relations at the
>>> University of Winnipeg.
>>>
>>> Kinew said a group of people in Winnipeg, Toronto and Ottawa are
>>> collaborating to nominate the two men, who they believe are jointly
>>> responsible for giving back hope to Canada's indigenous people that
>>> hasn't existed in a long time.
>>>
>>> "They made it into something that is peace-building and
>>> nation-building," Kinew said. "It has really transformed our country."
>>>
>>> Mia Rabson, Ottawa Bureau Chief
>>> 613-369–4824
>>>
>>> Paul
>>> Samyn, Editor
>>> 204–697–7295
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos
>>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:05:01 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Wab Kinew
>>> To: w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca, "Paul.Lynch"
>>> , "Marianne.Ryan"
>>>
>>> Cc: David Amos
>>>
>>> https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2015/12/21/why-do-canadians-need
>>> -to-know-anything-about-injuns/
>>>
>>> http://www.uwinnipeg.ca/about/administration/avp-igca.htmlAssociate
>>> Vice-President, Indigenous Affairs
>>>
>>> Wab Kinew
>>> phone: 204.789.9931
>>> email: w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca
>>> Biography/Publications
>>>
>>> Executive Assistant
>>>
>>> Sarra Deane
>>> phone: 204.988.7121
>>> email: s.deane@uwinnipeg.ca
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --- Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are
> confidential and subject to copyright. They are intended only for the
> use of the intended recipient(s) and may be privileged. If you are not
> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review,
> retransmission, conversion to hard copy, copying, circulation or other
> use of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you
> are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately
> by return e-mail, and delete this message and any attachments from
> your system.
>
> --- Avis de confidentialité : Ce message et toute pièce jointe sont
> confidentiels et assujettis au droit d’auteur. Il est de l’usage
> exclusif du ou des destinataire(s) visé(s) et peuvent être
> confidentiels. Si vous n’êtes pas le(s) destinataire(s) visé(s), nous
> attirons votre attention sur le fait qu’il est strictement interdit
> d’utiliser cette information, de la transmettre, de l’imprimer sur
> papier, de la copier, de la distribuer ou de la diffuser. Si vous
> n’êtes pas le destinataire visé, veuillez en aviser immédiatement
> l’expéditeur par courriel électronique et détruire ce message et toute
> copie de celui-ci.
>
> --------------------------------
> This email is a service from Liberal / Assistance.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos
> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 19:54:24 -0400
> Subject: Re My calls about Federal Court File # T-1557-15 The
> Commionaires, the Canadian Forces, the RCMP and other police forces
> etc are mentioned thoughout my complaint Paragraph 20 is just one
> example
> To: bbrydon@commissionaires.ns.ca, gordonabarnett@yahoo.ca,
> darrell.harvey@ns.sympatico.ca, nbvpa@cpi-ac.ca, president@cpi-ac.ca,
> secretary@cpi-ac.ca, ethicschairman@cpi-ac.ca, peipa@cpi-ac.ca,
> "Jonathan.Vance" , "john.warr"
>
> Cc: David Amos , upriverwatch
> , COCMoncton ,
> mcq@nb.sympatico.ca, info@nbshalegascomm.ca,
> Nika.Joncas-Bourget@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca, "peter.dauphinee"
> , markandcaroline
> , oldmaison ,
> "David.Coon" , "ron.tremblay2"
>
>
> https://kentcountynbenvironmentwatch.wordpress.com/2014/10/31/investigation-into-rcmp-response-to-kent-county-nb-anti-fracking-protests-june-december-2013/
>
> https://www.nbchf-cnbfh.ca/submission/notre-environnement-notre-choix-our-environment-our-choice
>
> http://www.goc411.ca/Employees/Details/44720
>
> http://thenewtownsquare.ca/?p=3
>
> http://thenewtownsquare.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/2014-10-28-Mandate-from-Bill-Brydon-201410031116.pdf
>
> https://www.twinbirchconsulting.com/contact.html
>
> http://nbchf-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/submissions/9waisw3tyb9-b65310c21c6b1fc86dfd471af205f481.pdf
>
> http://cpi-ac.ca/index.php/member-firms/nova-scotia
>
> Commissionaires Nova Scotia
> PO Box 2063
> Halifax, NS B3J 2Z1
> Phone: 902-429-8101
> Fax: 902-429-0592
>
> Email: bbrydon@commissionaires.ns.ca
> Website: http://www.commissionaires.ns.ca
>
> President Thomas McNulty
> Office: (506)-650-3971
> Email: president@cpi-ac.ca
>
> Secretary & Media
> Floyd Meunier
> Office: (506) 859-0484
> Cell: (506) 863-3265
> Fax: (506) 382-1470
> Email: secretary@cpi-ac.ca
>
> NEW BRUNSWICK VICE-PRESIDENT
> John Sabine
> Phone: 506-832-1894
> Email: nbvpa@cpi-ac.ca
>
> PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND VICE-PRESIDENT
> David MacDonald
> Office: (902) 892-9640
> Fax: (902) 892-7025
> Email:peipa@cpi-ac.ca
>
> ETHICS COMMITTEE
> Mike Gautreau
> Office: Office: (506)-866-8777
> Email: ethicschairman@cpi-ac.ca
>
> Hereto attached are some of documents that are now before Federal
> Court right now.
>
> The text of my filings can be found here.
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>
> Your lawyers will have to query the docket to see the CROWN's filing
> as they contain an amazing amount of desperate bullshit that I could
> not possibly scan.
>
> This was what was said in the past month before the court during oral
> arguments pertaining to Federal Court File no T-1557-15
>
> Dec 14th
> https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>
> Jan 11th
> https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>
>
> http://commissionaires.ns.ca/?page_id=236
>
> Deputy Commissioner Steve W. Graham,OOM, BA, MBA (Ret’d)
>
> Executive Committee
>
> D/Commr Graham is the former Deputy Commissioner East, responsible for
> RCMP services in the provinces of Ontario, Quebec and the Atlantic
> Provinces, retiring 8 June 2013 after 38 years service with the RCMP.
> Prior to this appointment, he was the Deputy Commissioner Atlantic
> Canada and Commanding Officer for Nova Scotia (“H” Division). He also
> has served as the Commanding Officer of New Brunswick (“J” Division)
> and Prince Edward (“L” Division). D/Commr Graham was selected to the
> CNS Board in January 2011.
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>
> 20. The Plaintiff states that the RCMP and the members of the FPF
> who harassed the Plaintiff in September of 2006 while he was a
> candidate in the NB provincial election would not explain why the NB
> Sergeant-at-Arms and the COC had barred him with a document written in
> English only or why it was not published in the Royal Gazette. Members
> of the FPF who violated the Plaintiff’s privacy trying to read an
> email that he was composing on a laptop within his car parked on
> private property refused to explain why they thought they had the
> right do so as they attempted to interrogate him without a warrant or
> due process of law. Members of the FPF refused to take the same
> documents the RCMP had so that their major crimes unit could finally
> investigate after they demanded that the Plaintiff identify himself so
> they could check for warrants for his arrest. The FPF would not
> discuss what they would do if he returned to the UNB campus or if he
> parked a vehicle and put money in a parking meter on the side of Queen
> Street claimed by the Sergeant-at-Arms. In February of 2007 after a
> Cabinet Minister of NB acknowledged his concerns with the RCMP, his
> children took pictures of the Plaintiff standing on the legislative
> property and the Sergeant-at-Arms and the FPF did nothing that day.
> However, the police harassment got worse afterwards. The FPF tried to
> call him a criminal while the Plaintiff waited for answers before he
> argued the Crown in court about his property that the FPF had
> illegally seized. The text of two emails that the Crown and the FPF
> sent in 2007 are as follows:
>
>               “Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>                From: "Murphy, Michael B. $DH/MS$" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>                To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>                Subject:
>
>                    January 30, 2007
>
>                    WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
>                    Mr. David Amos
>
>                    Dear Mr. Amos:
>
>                          This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of
> your e-mail of December
>                     29, 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
> Because of the
>                     nature of the allegations made in your message, I
> have taken the
>                     measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant
> Commissioner Steve Graham
>                     of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton .
>
>                    Sincerely,
>                    Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>                    Minister of Health”
>
>                                                        AND
>
>                 “From: “Lafleur, Lou” lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca
>                   To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com,
>                   Subject: Fredericton Police Force
>                   Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:21:13 -0300
>
>                          Dear Mr. Amos
>
>           My Name is Lou LaFleur and I am a Detective with the
> Fredericton Police Major Crime Unit. I would like to talk to you
> regarding files that I am investigating and that you are alleged to
> have involvement in.
>
>             Please call me at your earliest convenience and leave a
> message and a phone number on my secure and confidential line if I am
> not in my office.
>                          yours truly,
>
>                          Cpl. Lou LaFleur
>                          Fredericton Police Force
>                          311 Queen St.
>                          Fredericton, NB
>                          506-460-2332
>
> 21. The Plaintiff states that by September of 2007, he was told by
> police officers and others that he was barred from the town of
> Woodstock, the House of Commons, the National Capital District
> including Rideau Hall and the University of Ottawa, the Capital
> District of NB including the Lieutenant Governor’s residence and the
> University of NB, all other legislative properties in Canada and that
> a photograph of him was posted inside the NB legislative building, the
> Fredericton airport and at least one mining property guarded by the
> Corps of Commissionaires.
>
> 22. The Plaintiff states that on or about September 13, 2007 during a
> conversation with the office of the Speaker of the House of Commons he
> was referred to the Sergeant-at-Arms in order to find out if the
> Plaintiff was truly barred from the House of Commons and if he had
> been sent an answer to the documentation the Speaker and the
> government of Iceland received in May of 2006. The Sergeant-at-Arms
> was apparently well aware of his concerns because he said he knew the
> Plaintiff from a past life and quickly hung up the telephone. The
> Sergeant-at-Arms never did answer the Plaintiff and ignored all his
> contacts ever since.
>
> 23. The Plaintiff states that the odd response from Sergeant-at-Arms
> of the House of Commons caused him to research how they knew each
> other. The public record states that in June of 2005 the RCMP officer
> acting as Aide-de-Camp to the NB Lieutenant Governor retired and
> joined the House of Commons as Director of Security Operations. On
> September 1, 2006, he became the Sergeant-at-Arms of the House of
> Commons. Therefore, because of all three of his positions from June of
> 2004 to December of 2014, the Sergeant-at-Arms of the House of Commons
> must have agreed and seconded his fellow Sergeant-at-Arms in NB and
> his threats to arrest Plaintiff if he reappeared on parliamentary
> property.
>
> 24. The Plaintiff states that with regards to this complaint about
> being illegally barred from parliamentary properties, the most recent
> contact from the Crown was the three members of the RCMP who harassed
> the Plaintiff at 1:30 AM on December 16, 2014 not long after he had
> received an email from a former CSIS agent who is the current
> Sergeant-at-Arms of the legislative assembly of Alberta.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos
> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 17:37:06 -0400
> Subject: Re Federal Court File # T-1557-15 Whereas outside counsel for
> the RCMP now prefer emails from me rather than confer in private
> please allow me to introduce Andrew Kemp to Mark Ertel
> To: akemp , "craig.callens"
> , m.ertel@bsbcriminallaw.com,
> "roger.l.brown" , "bob.paulson"
> , "lianna.longo"
> , "Ian.McPhail"
> , lporteous@kleinlyons.com, sunrayzulu
> , "Paul.Lynch" ,
> patrick_doran1 , pol7163
> , Glen Canning , police
> , mnielsen
> Cc: David Amos , Tracey Matters
> , cward@laxtonco.com, "Colin.Warwick"
> , "Paul.Collister"
> , radical ,
> "Jacques.Poitras" , nmoore
> , oldmaison , "Leanne.Fitch"
>
>
> http://www.princegeorgecitizen.com/news/local-news/rcmp-respond-to-matters-civil-suit-1.1737963
>
> RCMP respond to Matters civil suit
> Mark NIELSEN / Prince George Citizen
> January 21, 2015 10:25 AM
>
> Andrew Kemp,
> Lawyer & Mediator
> 411 Quebec Street, Suite 204
> Prince George, BC V2L 1W5
> akemp@andrewkemp.ca
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/rcmp-labour-code-moncton-shootings-1.3413830
>
> RCMP chooses trial by judge on Labour Code charges
> 4 charges relate to equipment, training and supervision after 3
> officers killed, 2 wounded by Justin Bourque
>
> CBC News Posted: Jan 22, 2016 6:00 AM AT
>
> Mark Ertel
> Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
> Phone:
> 613-604-2188
> 877-786-4479
> Fax:
> 613-236-6958
> E-mail: m.ertel@bsbcriminallaw.com
>
> Too Too Funny Parker Rudderham's old lawyer buddy turns on him
>
> http://www.frankmagazine.ca/node/4355
>
> Oct 24, 2015 - Did Joel Pink call the cops on me? This bit of
> correspondence, direct from the chrome-domed Pink Larkin partner's
> lair in the Trillium building
>
> HOWEVER THIS WAS NOT FUNNY AT ALL
>
> http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2012/11/01/frank_magazine_owner_to_fight_ticket_after_fatal_collision_in_cape_breton.html
>
> Frank magazine owner to fight ticket after fatal collision in Cape Breton
> Prominent businessman Parker Rudderham was fined $399.91 after his
> Cadillac Escalade collided with a motorcycle, killing the motorcycle
> driver.
>
> By: Karissa Donkin Staff Reporter, Published on Thu Nov 01 2012
>
> A prominent Cape Breton businessman plans to fight a $399.91 Motor
> Vehicle Act ticket he received after he was involved in a fatal
> collision.
>
> Douglas Parker Rudderham is president and CEO of Quebec-based Pharmacy
> Wholesale Services Inc., a company that bills itself on its website as
> “the largest privately held wholesale medical diagnostics distributor
> in North America.”
>
> “It’s like anybody else, you get a speeding ticket, and you don’t
> agree with it, you contest it,” said Joel Pink, Rudderham’s lawyer.
>
> The 57-year-old also owns Coltsfoot Publishing, which publishes
> Halifax-based Frankmagazine, a news, commentary and satire magazine
> that tackles everything from politics to the local rumour mill.
>
> On Sept. 14, Rudderham was driving his Cadillac Escalade in Sydney,
> N.S. around 4 p.m. when his vehicle collided with a motorcycle
> travelling in front of him.
>
> The motorcycle driver, 67-year-old Jack MacDonald, was pronounced dead
> at the scene.
>
> Since then, the collision has been the talk of Cape Breton, said
> MacDonald’s sister-in-law, who did not want to be named. “You can’t go
> anywhere. Everybody’s talking about it.”
>
> MacDonald’s sister-in-law said he once sat on a committee to have
> traffic lights installed at the intersection. “He tried really, really
> hard but to no avail.”
>
> MacDonald was on his way home from getting a haircut when the
> collision happened, she said.
>
> Investigators ruled out criminal negligence in the collision, but
> police “still believe that (Rudderham) was responsible for the
> collision,” said Cape Breton Regional Police Service spokeswoman
> Desiree Vassallo.
>
> He has been charged with failing to drive or operate a motor vehicle
> in a careful and prudent manner under the Motor Vehicle Act, she said.
> In addition to a fine, the charge carries a penalty of six demerit
> points.
>
> Pink said Rudderham, who goes by his middle name, Parker, intends to
> plead not guilty in January, sending the matter to trial.
>
> “Mr. Rudderham believes in principle. He’s not the type of person who
> pleads (guilty) to something that he didn’t do just to get out of it,”
> Pink said.
>
> “He could pay $399 and go home and accumulate six points and that’s it
> . . . but he definitely says that he was not driving carelessly or
> imprudently.”
>
> Pink said his client is grieving for MacDonald’s family.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Chisholm, Jill"
> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 19:43:52 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Federal Court File # T-1557-15 For the
> Public Record I just called the lawyers Duff Conacher and David Baker
> and they paled dumb as usual
> To: David Amos
>
> Thank you for your message. I will be away from the office until
> Monday, January 25, 2016 and will not be accessing email frequently
> during this time. Should you require assistance please contact
> Jacqueline Fenton at (902) 426-6996. Otherwise I will be pleased to
> respond to your message upon my return.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos
> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 15:43:48 -0400
> Subject: Re Federal Court File # T-1557-15 For the Public Record I
> just called the lawyers Duff Conacher and David Baker and they paled
> dumb as usual
> To: duff@goodorg.ca, dbaker@bakerlaw.ca, "bill.pentney"
> , "jill.chisholm"
> , "david.hansen"
> , mcu , "Gilles.Moreau"
> , "dean.buzza"
> , "Michael.Wernick"
>
> Cc: David Amos
>
> Lets see if the Upper Canadian lawyers can understand an old voicemail
> from Brazil and a Published email exchange EH Michael.Wernick???
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html
>
> Duff Conacher, LL.B.
> Director, GoodOrg.ca Consulting
> 416-546-3443
> duff@goodorg.ca
>
> David Baker B.A., LL.B., LL.M., L.S.M.
> email: dbaker@bakerlaw.ca
> phone: 416 533-0040, ext. 222
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos
> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 12:57:07 -0400
> Subject: Well Greta.Bossenmaier the latest boss of the CSE can never
> deny that all of the "Five Eyes" are well aware of me now N'esy Pas
> Elizabeth May?
> To: WhistleblowerProtection@tigta.treas.gov,
> Paul.Samyn@freepress.mb.ca, "george.osborne.mp"
> , J.Key@ministers.govt.nz,
> SpeakersOffice3@parliament.govt.nz, Andrew.Robb.MP@aph.gov.au,
> "George.Soros" ,
> "stephen.harper.a1" , "elizabeth.may"
> , "David.Coon" , gopublic
> , whistle , washington field
> , whistleblower
> , Whistleblower ,
> crof@shaw.ca, "justin.ling" , editor@thetyee.ca,
> Karine Fortin , "carolyn.bennett"
> , Doug@dougeyolfson.ca,
> doug.eyolfson@parl.gc.ca, fpcity@freepress.mb.ca,
> w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca, "Paul.Lynch" ,
> "Marianne.Ryan" , sunrayzulu
> , dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, "john.green"
> , chiefape ,
> Catherine.Harrop@cbc.ca, "redmond.shannon" ,
> Joe Friday , loyalistlaw@gmail.com,
> "steve.roberge" , "robert.stoney"
> , "Leanne.Fitch" ,
> tj@burkelaw.ca, "lou.lafleur" ,
> jeddy@coxandpalmer.com, oldmaison , andre
> , "greg.byrne" , paulzed@zed.ca,
> smay@coxandpalmer.com, nbpc , "Greta.Bossenmaier"
> , "Jonathan.Vance"
> , "jon.gerrard"
> , Karen.Kraushaar@tigta.treas.gov,
> "roger.l.brown" , "Wayne.Gallant"
>
> Cc: halifaxmedia@state.gov, ACS@state.gov, consularh@state.gov, David
> Amos , j.russell.george@tigta.treas.gov,
> Complaints@tigta.treas.gov, TIGTAcommunications
> , David.barnes@tigta.treas.gov
>
> Afte all US Ambassador Bruce Heyman and US Consul General Steven
> Giegerich cannot deny that the CBC and a former US Ambassador got
> exactly the same pile of document from Mean Old Me just in time for my
> birthday in July of 2002 CORRECT? Berfore Anyone tries to deny it
> perhaps you should review page 14 of the pdf hereto attached then read
> all the rest rather closely N'esy Pas?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> http://halifax.usconsulate.gov/news_events/2015/halifax-welcomes-new-consul-general.html
>
> Purdy's Wharf Tower II
> 1969 Upper Water Street, Suite 904
> Halifax, NS B3J 3R7
> Phone 1-902-429-2480
>
> Email for questions relating to services for American citizens:
> Halifax-ACS@state.gov.
>
> Email for questions about non-immigrant visas: consularh@state.gov.
> Please note questions will not receive a response if the answer is on
> the website.
>
> Email for media inquiries: halifaxmedia@state.gov
>
>
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos"
> To: ; ;
> "birgittaj" ; "ed.pilkington"
> ; "steven.blaney"
> ; "roger.l.brown"
>
> Cc: "David Amos" ;
> ; ;
> ; "ndesrosiers"
> Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 10:54 PM
> Subject: Snowden ain't got nothing on mean old me when it comes to
> dealing with corrupt Feds and keeping one's Integrity as well
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos
> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:40:18 -0300
> Subject: YO FBI Special Agent Richard Deslauriers I just called your
> office and the nasty Yankee played dumb as usual
> To: boston@ic.fbi.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, "bob.paulson"
> , "Kevin.leahy"
> , Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov,
> us.marshals@usdoj.gov, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney
> , bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net
> Cc: David Amos , birgittaj
> , shmurphy@globe.com, Red Ice Creations
>
>
> Clearly I am not joking
>
> Just Dave
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 19,571
> Domain Name (Unknown)
> IP Address 153.31.113.# (FBI Criminal Justice Information Systems)
> ISP FBI Criminal Justice Information Systems
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : United States (Facts)
> State : West Virginia
> City : Clarksburg
> Lat/Long : 39.2664, -80.3097 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
> CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022; InfoPath.2;
> .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; MS-RTC
> LM 8; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 800 x 600
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Jun 12 2013 5:00:01 pm
> Last Page View Jun 12 2013 5:00:01 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.google.co...YIZDuTIWsfuPUhflswCk
> Search Engine google.com
> Search Words jp morgan and "andrew kosloff"
> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...-stewart-and-me.html
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...-stewart-and-me.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time Jun 12 2013 4:00:01 pm
> Visit Number 19,571
>
> On 6/15/13, David Amos wrote:
>> FBI Boston
>> One Center Plaza
>> Suite 600
>> Boston, MA 02108
>> Phone: (617) 742-5533
>> Fax: (617) 223-6327
>> E-mail: Boston@ic.fbi.gov
>>
>> Hours
>> Although we operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, our normal
>> "walk-in" business hours are from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
>> through Friday. If you need to speak with a FBI representative at any
>> time other than during normal business hours, please telephone our
>> office at (617) 742-5533.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos
>> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300
>> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is
>> finally underway now correct? What the hell do I do with the wiretap
>> tapes Sell them on Ebay?
>> To: Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov,
>> Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney ,
>> bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, michael wolfheart
>> , jonathan.albano@bingham.com,
>> shmurphy@globe.com, mvalencia@globe.com
>> Cc: David Amos , oldmaison
>> , PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov, rounappletree@aol.com
>>
>> http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/06/05/james-whitey-bulger-jury-selection-process-enters-second-day/KjS80ofyMMM5IkByK74bkK/story.html
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask
>> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly2006
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Amos"
>> To: "Fred.Wyshak" ; "jcarney"
>> ; ;
>>
>> Cc: ; "maritime_malaise" ;
>> "Wayne.Lang"
>> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 11:50 AM
>> Subject: So Fred Wyshak has Brian Kelly and the rest of the corrupt
>> Feds practiced the spirit of fill disclosure with Jay Carney??
>>
>> If so then why didn't Mr Carney return my phone calls last July???
>>
>> http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2012/01/09/bulger_lawyers_due_in_court_for_update_on_evidence/
>>
>> http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/lawyer_known_as_patron_saint_of_hopeless_cases_is_representing_whitey_bulge/
>>
>> http://bostonherald.com/news/regional/view/2011_0625lawyer_tab_is_in_billys_court_feds_believe_brother_should_shell_out_for_defense
>>
>> http://articles.boston.com/2011-07-01/news/29726987_1_jay-carney-bulger-brookline-clinics
>>
>> http://carneybassil.com/team/carney/
>>
>> Truth is stranger than fiction. Perhaps Ben Affleck and Matt Damon a
>> couple of boyz from Beantown who done good will pay attention to mean
>> old me someday EH?
>>
>> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/ben-affleck-matt-damon-whitey-bulger-254994
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/03/attnacting-north-district-commander.html
>
>
>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos
>>> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 20:39:26 -0400
>>> Subject: YO Ian McPhail Re: The Commission for Public Complaints
>>> against RCMP - #2013-2824
>>> To: Sheldon , Blair , "steve.graham"
>>> , "Gilles.Moreau"
>>>
>>> Cc: David Amos , "steve.murphy"
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos
>>> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 03:44:52 -0300
>>> Subject: YO Ian McPhail Re: The Commission for Public Complaints
>>> against RCMP - #2013-2824
>>> To: PCC Complaints , "Ian.McPhail"
>>> , "bob.paulson"
>>> , "steven.blaney"
>>> , pm , "Gilles.Moreau"
>>> , "roger.l.brown"
>>> , warren , jacques
>>> boucher ,
>>> Gunther.Schonfeldt@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, rusun@un.int,
>>> john.adams@queensu.ca, John.Forster@cse-cst.gc.ca,
>>> td.ombudsman@td.com, christopher.montague@td.com,
>>> Frank.McKenna@td.com, Glenn.Greenwald@guardian.co.uk,
>>> info@praxisfilms.org, birgittaj@althingi.is
>>> Cc: David Amos , "justin.trudeau.a1"
>>> , MulcaT ,
>>> enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk, sarah.chapman@fsa.gov.uk,
>>> ambassador@brasilemb.org, slrc@itamaraty.gov.br
>>>
>>> WOW Ya think somebody within the "Five Eyes" would finally do their
>>> job now EH Glen Greenwald and the President Rousseff'?
>>>
>>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: PCC Complaints
>>> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:59:52 +0000
>>> Subject: The Commission for Public Complaints against RCMP - #2013-2824
>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>
>>> This is further to your recent communications with the Commission.
>>> From September 18, 2013 to the present, our office has received 6
>>> electronic messages from you. Many of these e-mails are not related to
>>> RCMP conduct.
>>>
>>> On October 1, 2013, you called our office and spoke with an Intake
>>> Officer. You wished to enquire about three complaint files. When the
>>> Intake Officer attempted to inform you that you have three enquiry
>>> files with the Commission, you became agitated and insisted otherwise.
>>> You raised your voice and spoke over the Intake Officer. You then
>>> demanded the name of the Intake Officer, and subsequently yelled "see
>>> you in federal court" and hung up the telephone line.
>>>
>>> As a reminder, we request that all future correspondence with our
>>> office must be courteous in tone and that you are respectful of the
>>> requests that are made of you. While it is clearly not the intention
>>> of the Commission to prevent you from making complaints against
>>> members of the RCMP, your recent emails and telephone call have been
>>> unproductive for both you and for Commission staff. In the future, we
>>> request that all communication with our office be respectful in
>>> language and related to our mandate. In the event that this request
>>> is not respected, the Commission will consider imposing restrictions
>>> on how you may communicate with our office.
>>>
>>> Should you have a complaint about a specific RCMP member surrounding a
>>> specific incident, I invite you to visit the Commission's website
>>> (www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca) to submit an online
>>> complaint, rather than to send an email that is difficult to follow or
>>> a copy of a letter you have sent to many others. The complaint form
>>> will guide you through the information required that will enable the
>>> Commission to process your complaint. Should you have difficulty in
>>> accessing the complaint form and wish to have one sent to you, you may
>>> provide your mailing address and a form will be mailed to you via
>>> Canada Post.
>>>
>>> I would also invite you to send your correspondence regarding any new
>>> or existing complaints (quoting the appropriate Commission file
>>> number) by letter mail to:
>>>
>>> Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP
>>> National Intake Office
>>> PO Box 88689
>>> Surrey, BC V3W 0X1
>>>
>>> Yours truly,
>>>
>>> Günther Schönfeldt
>>> Intake Officer / Agent d'information de liaison
>>> Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP /
>>> Commission des plaintes du public contre la Gendarmerie royale du Canada
>>> Tel/Tél : 1-800-665-6878 | Fax/Téléc : (604) 501-4095
>>> complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [Description: Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CCF6DA.65AE7FE0]
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: !enquiries
>>> Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:56:26 +0100
>>> Subject: IPCC Reference: 2013/015918
>>> To: David Amos
>>>
>>> Dear Mr Amos
>>>
>>> I acknowledge receipt of 4 emails at the Independent Police Complaints
>>> Commission (IPCC) earlier today.
>>>
>>> I note from our records that you have been advised on the IPCC remit,
>>> as well as spoken with one of my colleagues in the customer contact
>>> team. It remains unclear from your emails what your complaint against
>>> the police is. This may be because you refer to a number of other
>>> organisations, or matters outside of the IPCC's remit.
>>>
>>> If you wish to make a complaint against the police you should provide
>>> these details to either the IPCC or the relevant police force's
>>> professional standards department (PSD).
>>>
>>> The IPCC does not investigate allegations of crime(s) committed by
>>> members of the public, nor can we direct a police force to commence an
>>> investigation into such.
>>>
>>> If you have any queries about the IPCC's remit or the complaints
>>> process please contact us. However, emails to the IPCC that fall
>>> outside of our remit will be read and filed, but may not be responded
>>> to.
>>>
>>> Kind regards
>>>
>>> Elly Goodman
>>> Customer Contact Adviser
>>> Independent Police Complaints Commission
>>> Tel: 0300 020 0096
>>> Email: enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
>>>
>>>
>>> The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
>>> Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in
>>> partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On
>>> leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
>>> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
>>> and/or recorded for legal purposes.
>>>
>>>
>>> Talk about pissing a guy off. EH Ian McPhail? What planet do CROWN's
>>> bureaucrats come from anyway?
>>>
>>> Need I say BULLSHIT once again??? The other CROWN Corp commonly know
>>> as the CBC often puts that word over our airwaves so that can't be
>>> offensive. That said I bet the call was recorded If so I demand a copy
>>> ASAP. Next time I call I will record the call myself.
>>>
>>> I must ask did the oh so silent boss Ian MacPhail and his buddy Bob
>>> Paulson about the Yankee wiretap tapes being evidence of MURDER?
>>> Better check the Canadian Ciminal Code about assisting in the cover up
>>> of such crimes EH?
>>>
>>> As for the call I remember it like it was yesterday. Howcome it took
>>> Günther Schönfeldt three weeks to dream up the same sort of response I
>>> got in 2007??? The first thing I did was ask for him and the woman
>>> claimed he was not avaible and offered to help. She started out quite
>>> nice but as soon as she admited that there was only a faxed complaint
>>> in November of 2003 and that it did not warrant an answer I told her
>>> to look some more. She got fairly argumentive and did not wish to
>>> discuss the complaint I sent in August of 2005 (It appeared to me that
>>> she read something in my file) I gave up and asked her name when she
>>> got to snarky and she refused to give other than "Nora" So I said Cya
>>> in Federal Court and hung up. The I sent your buddy Bob Paulson and
>>> YOU Ian McPhail a Motherload of emails but I did only sent your
>>> mindless bureaucrats six that were largely unrelated if they did not
>>> know how to read deep.
>>>
>>> However your Commission should not deny that I argued with its former
>>> lawyer/boss Shirley Heafey about the aforesaid compliant in 2005
>>> within emails sent to many Parliamentarians months for a I ran for a
>>> sent Parliament again and she was replaced by the lawyer Paul Kennedy.
>>> (The lawyer Heafey and your Commission always denied that complaint
>>> existed until your office sent me a similar bullshit email after Mike
>>> Murphy a former Minister of Health and later another former Attorney
>>> General asked Deputy Commissioner Steve Graham to investigate my
>>> concerns.
>>>
>>> In return the Graham got transferred to Nova Scotia and RCMP falsely
>>> arrested REMEMBER Stevey Boy Harper?
>>>
>>> As I said Cya'll in Federal Court
>>>
>>> Veritas Vincit
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>> 1 902 800 0369
>>>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Robb, Andrew (MP)"
> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:34:24 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Re J. Russell George the US Treasury
> Inspector General for Tax Administration and his response to Federal
> Court File No: T-1557-15
> To: David Amos
>
> Thank you for taking the time to contact me.
>
> This is an automatically generated reply so that you know that your
> email has arrived.
>
> As you will appreciate given the large number of emails received each
> day, a reply cannot be sent immediately, nor can a reply be sent to
> every email received.
>
> I will however read your correspondence.
>
> I prioritise emails from my constituents and those relating to my
> trade, investment and tourism portfolio.
>
> If your email relates to my responsibilities as Minister for Trade and
> Investment, I will consider your correspondence and respond if
> appropriate.
>
> If your email is part of an automatically generated campaign, I will
> note your views.
>
> For those interested, there is a significant amount of useful facts
> regarding the China FTA and Trans Pacific Partnership on my
> Department’s website:
>
> http://dfat.gov.au/trade/agreements/chafta/Pages/australia-china-fta.aspx
>
> and
>
> http://dfat.gov.au/trade/agreements/tpp/Pages/trans-pacific-partnership-agreement-tpp.aspx
>
>
> In the meantime, you may be interested in completing my community
> survey by clicking
> here. You
> may also be interested in visiting my
> website,
> Facebook,
> Twitter, or
> YouTube pages.
>
> Yours sincerely,
> ANDREW ROBB
> Minister for Trade & Investment
> Federal Member for Goldstein
>
> E: andrew.robb.mp@aph.gov.au
>
> Electorate Office
> 368 Centre Road, Bentleigh VIC 3204
> P 03 9557 4644   F 03 9557 2906
>
> Parliament House
> Suite M1-22
> Parliament House
> Canberra ACT 2600
> P (02) 6277 7420   F (02) 6273 4128
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "J Key (MIN)"
> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:35:08 +0000
> Subject: Thank you for your email
> To: David Amos
>
> On behalf of the Prime Minister, Rt Hon John Key, thank you for your email.
>
> Please note that although email increases the speed of delivery, it
> may not be possible to provide you with the rapid response users of
> email may anticipate.
>
> The fact that you have taken the time to write is appreciated. You
> can be assured that your views will be noted.
>
>
> Yours sincerely
> The Office of the Prime Minister
>
> ________________________________
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "OSBORNE, George"
> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:34:35 +0000
> Subject: Thank you for your e-mail
> To: David Amos
>
>
>
> Rt Hon George Osborne MP
>
> Thank you for your email. This is an automated response.
>
> If you are contacting George Osborne in his capacity as Chancellor of
> the Exchequer, please re-send your email to
> public.enquiries@hmtreasury.gsi.gov.uk.
> Alternatively, write to: The Correspondence & Enquiry Unit, HM
> Treasury, 1 Horseguards Road, London, SW1A 2HQ or telephone 020 7270
> 5000.
>
> If you are a resident of the Tatton constituency, please ensure that
> you have included your full postal address and postcode so that we can
> identify you as a constituent. We receive a large volume of emails
> every day and will reply to your message as soon as possible.
>
> The Tatton Office, which is for constituents only, can be reached on
> 01565 873 037. If you are unsure whether George Osborne is your MP,
> you can check by using this utility: http://findyourmp.parliament.uk
>
> If you are a personal contact, your e-mail will be forwarded to Mr
> Osborne accordingly.
>
> Office of the Rt Hon George Osborne MP
> First Secretary of State & Chancellor of the Exchequer
> Member of Parliament for Tatton
>
> UK Parliament Disclaimer: This e-mail is confidential to the intended
> recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
> and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or
> copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses,
> but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus
> transmitted by this e-mail. This e-mail address is not secure, is not
> encrypted and should not be used for sensitive data.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Elizabeth.May@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:34:22 +0000
> Subject: Thank you for contacting the Office of Elizabeth May, O.C., M.P
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you for contacting me. This response is to assure you that your
> message has been received. I welcome and appreciate receiving comments
> and questions from constituents.
>
> I receive a much larger volume of correspondence (postal and email)
> than the average MP. My office replied to over 400,000 pieces of
> correspondence 2014. All emails are reviewed on a regular basis,
> however due to the high volume of emails my office receives, I may not
> be able to respond personally to each one.
>
> My constituents in Saanich-Gulf Islands are my highest priority. If
> you are a constituent, please email
> elizabeth.may.c1a@parl.gc.ca. To
> help me serve you better, please ensure that your email includes your
> full name and street address with your postal code.
>
> For meeting requests and invitations, please email
> requests@greenparty.ca.
>
> Thank you once again for contacting me.
>
> Elizabeth May, O.C., M.P.
> Member of Parliament for Saanich-Gulf Islands
> Leader of the Green Party of Canada
>
> --
>
> Je vous remercie d'avoir communiqué avec moi. La présente réponse vous
> confirme que votre message a été reçu. Les questions et les
> commentaires des électeurs sont toujours les bienvenus.
>
> Je reçois une correspondance (postale et électronique) beaucoup plus
> abondante que le député type. Mon bureau a répondu à plus de 400 000
> lettres en 2014. Tous les messages électroniques sont lus
> régulièrement, mais, en raison de l'abondance des courriels reçus à
> mon bureau, il se peut que je ne sois pas en mesure de répondre
> personnellement à chacun d'entre eux.
>
> Mes électeurs de Saanich-Gulf Islands passent en premier. Si vous êtes
> un électeur, veuillez écrire à
> elizabeth.may.c1a@parl.gc.ca.
> Pour m'aider à mieux vous servir, veillez à ce que votre courriel
> comporte votre nom complet, votre adresse municipale et votre code
> postal.
>
> Pour les demandes de rencontre et les invitations, veuillez écrire à
> requests@greenparty.ca.
>
> Je vous remercie encore d'avoir communiqué avec moi.
>
> Elizabeth May, O.C.
> Députée de Saanich-Gulf Islands
> Chef du Parti vert du Canada
>
>
> On 1/21/16, David Amos wrote:
>> Methinks I will give the latest US Consul General, Steven Giegerich,
>> lin my neck of the woods a call this morning to see who has a bigger
>> file on each other and ask him the obvious question about J. Russell
>> George..
>>
>> Obviously I heard Giegerich say he was talking to the RCMP in Fat Fred
>> City just before I appeared in Federal Court. I bet when he said that
>> that both the CBC and the US State Dept was wondering if my name came
>> up EH Ast Com Roger Brown?
>>
>> https://player.fm/series/information-morning-fredericton-from-cbc-radio-new-brunswick-highlights/consul-general
>>
>> Whereas J. Russell George has afmitted knowledge of my concerns in
>> writing several times perhaps he should blow the whistle him

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/anti-masking-group-tied-to-anti-vaccination-covid-19-1.5661790

Anti-masking groups draw from anti-vaccination playbook to spread misinformation

Downplaying dangers of COVID-19, taking research out of context are common strategies, experts say

Nicole Ireland · CBC News · Posted: Jul 27, 2020 4:00 AM ET

A woman holds a sign at an anti-mask rally in Toronto on July 25. Messages decrying both mandatory masks and vaccines are common at such protests. Canadian public health officials have never suggested that it would be mandatory to be immunized against COVID-19 if a vaccine was successfully developed. (Michael Cole/CBC)

As more regions across the country adopt mandatory masking policies in an effort to minimize the spread of COVID-19, some anti-masking groups are joining forces with anti-vaccination proponents and adopting their techniques to spread misinformation and amplify their message.

The similarities between organized anti-masking and anti-vaccine movements are striking, said Maya Goldenberg, an associate professor of philosophy at the University of Guelph specializing in vaccine hesitancy.

At least one anti-masking group, Hugs Over Masks, actively partners with Vaccine Choice Canada, one of the country's most prominent anti-vaccination organizations.

Vladislav Sobolev, the anti-masking group's founder, has repeatedly praised the anti-vaccination group on social media and during protests.

Sobolev also told CBC News that high-profile U.S. anti-vaccination advocate Sherri Tenpenny, an osteopath who wrote Saying No To Vaccines, is providing online leadership training to his group.

Tenpenny, along with other anti-vaccination advocates in the U.S. and Canada, have embraced the anti-masking cause and opposed COVID-19 lockdown measures.

As people have emerged from COVID-19 isolation in their homes, the city of Toronto has implemented mandatory masking policies for indoor spaces, including stores, where physical distancing is difficult. (Evan Mitsui/CBC)

Many Canadians who don't want to wear masks aren't opposed to vaccines, but the fact that anti-vaccination groups are involved in the relatively new anti-masking movement of concern to many health experts.

Despite well-established evidence that vaccines are safe and effective, anti-vaccination groups have become savvy at spreading misinformation that leads people to distrust medical guidance — which can have dire consequences during a pandemic.

'Harmful outcomes'

"It disturbs me when I see people acting on information that I'm quite sure is not only incorrect, but potentially misleading and potentially leading to harmful outcomes," said Dr. Matthew Oughton, an infectious disease specialist at McGill University.

As a practising physician at Montreal's Jewish General Hospital, Oughton has seen first-hand the toll COVID-19 takes. Close to 9,000 people — largely seniors and people with underlying medical conditions — have died in Canada from the virus.

WATCH | Masks now mandatory in much of England:

Face coverings are now required inside most enclosed public spaces in England. England is also offering most people a free flu vaccine to guard against overwhelming hospitals this flu season. 3:31

Although scientists are continuing to learn about the novel coronavirus, it appears that people with COVID-19 can be most infectious before they show any symptoms, Oughton said.

That's different from many other viruses, including the first version of SARS. It's a key reason why it's important for people to wear masks — even if they feel perfectly healthy — when physical distancing isn't possible to prevent transmission, medical experts say.

Mistrust of health authorities fuels misinformation

Mistrust of government and scientific authorities are key characteristics among both anti-vaccination and anti-masking advocates, Goldenberg said.

"When you don't trust the sort of basic infrastructure that's supposed to support public well being, you're going to come up with all kinds of tactics to try to resist it," she told CBC News.

Those tactics include the "downplaying of how bad the infectious disease is," Goldenberg said.

Mistrust of government and scientific authorities is a key characteristic among both anti-vaccination and anti-masking advocates, says Maya Goldenberg, a University of Guelph expert in vaccine hesitancy. (Submitted by University of Guelph)

Before COVID-19, anti-vaccination groups were making false claims that measles — a serious, vaccine-preventable disease — wasn't a major threat. A consequence of that misinformation was an increase in vaccine hesitancy, leading to a resurgence of measles cases in Canada, where it had been declared eliminated in the late 1990s.

Similarly, during the COVID-19 pandemic, anti-vaccination and anti-masking groups have claimed that coronavirus isn't any more dangerous than other diseases, such as the flu. This is part of an effort to falsely convince people that public health measures to stop the spread of infection — from the development of a vaccine to physical distancing and wearing a mask — are unnecessary.

Many social media posts from both anti-masking and anti-vaccination groups call the pandemic a conspiracy, citing beliefs that it's been manufactured to give governments the ability to monitor people through contact tracing and to promote a vaccine agenda. Both groups often target Bill Gates, whose foundation has donated hundreds of millions of dollars to support immunizations globally.

When asked if Hugs Over Masks opposes vaccination, Sobolev did not answer directly.

"The right for an individual to have the choice on any medical intervention set forth by the public health departments is especially important when there are undeniable and inherent risks associated with the intervention in question," he said in an emailed response. "Health Freedom is not something that should be even in question."

Doctors, patients baffled as anti-maskers print of 'exemption cards'

B.C. doctor heads to court to demand mandatory mask rules

The group actively defies public health guidance during rallies, where people are encouraged to bring their children, reject physical distancing and not wear masks, saying that they refuse to adopt the "new normal" of life during the pandemic. Anti-masking rallies in Toronto appear to attract anywhere from a couple of dozen to around 150 people.

Sobolev said his group consider COVID-19 a "scamdemic," arguing Canada's hospitals would have been filled to capacity with COVID-19 patients if it were real.

WATCH | Anti-maskers now making 'exemption cards' to skirt bylaw:

As the CBC's Lorenda Reddekopp explains, anti-mask groups in Toronto are now making their own cards to avoid wearing face coverings in public places. 1:51

When CBC News suggested that the success of the public health measures his group was protesting were a reason more people didn't become critically ill, Sobolev said he didn't trust the numbers. He said people should look at South Dakota, which didn't have a state-imposed lockdown.

The claim that South Dakota had the lowest coronavirus infection rate in the U.S. is not accurate, according to a recent Reuters fact-check, but misinformation about the state's infection rates continues to circulate on social media.

Lawsuit alleges vaccine conspiracy

Vaccine Choice Canada, along with several individual plaintiffs, filed a statement of claim at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice this month against public health and political leaders in several municipalities, as well the province of Ontario and the federal government, including Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Chief Public Health Officer Dr. Theresa Tam and the Queen.

The lawsuit claims COVID-19 public health measures, including lockdowns, physical distancing and mandatory masking are violations of constitutional rights. It also claims that the pandemic was unnecessarily declared to further "non-medical agendas," including to establish a "New (Economic) World Order" and a "massive and concentrated push for mandatory vaccines of every human on the planet earth with concurrent electronic surveillance."

WATCH | U.S. President Donald Trump reverses stance on masks and other pandemic policies:

In the same week that COVID-19 cases increased on average by more than 65,000 per day across the United States, President Donald Trump made some key reversals in White House pandemic policy, including guidance on wearing masks. 1:56

Canadian public health officials have never suggested that a coronavirus vaccine, when developed, would be mandatory.

The lawsuit also names the CBC, accusing it of "Stalinist censorship" by "knowingly refusing to cover/or publish the valid and sound criticism of the COVID measures."

It's not clear when — or whether — the lawsuit will proceed through the courts.

'Cherry-picking' data

Another commonly used tactic by both anti-masking and anti-vaccination organizations is "cherry-picking" research studies that appear to support their viewpoint, but are often outdated or taken out of context, said McGill University's Dr. Oughton.

For example, anti-masking groups often incorrectly claim that wearing a mask is harmful because it reduces the supply of oxygen and causes people to breathe toxins back into their own body.
That's misinformation with no basis in fact, Oughton said.

"Surgeons wear these kinds of procedural masks in the operating theatre for, sometimes, hours and hours at a time. The surgeons are not dropping [from lack of oxygen]. They simply aren't," he said.

Do masks reduce your oxygen levels? Your COVID-19 questions answered

Another piece of false information that anti-maskers have been circulating is the idea that wearing a mask can harm a child's immune system — a claim Sobolev made to CBC News during a telephone interview.

Those kinds of "alarmist stories" playing into people's fears about their children's health are another way anti-vaccine and anti-masking groups try to further their agendas, said Goldenberg, the vaccine hesitancy expert.

How close are we to a vaccine for COVID-19?

Unlike combating vaccine misinformation, where the science has been clear for years, public health experts trying to correct mask misinformation are dealing with some confusion: their recommendations changed over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Anti-masking groups have seized upon that inconsistency and frequently cite public health officials from before the mask guidance changed.

Emerging research, changing guidance

Public health experts say they understand the confusion and how it could foster doubt in the current advice. They emphasize that it's an example of how quickly they've been learning about a new virus.

Back in March when the pandemic was first declared, there wasn't much scientific evidence to demonstrate mask effectiveness in preventing COVID-19, public health experts say.

Physical distancing was also a new concept. Public health officials worried people would think using masks meant they didn't have to pay as much attention to staying two metres apart from others.
Since then, more studies have been done, said Dr. Lawrence Loh, medical officer of health for Peel Region, near Toronto.

"The science in respect to COVID-19 has evolved and so has the recommendation around masks," Loh said. Once scientists learned the virus could be spread by people with no symptoms through respiratory droplets, they began advising the general public to wear non-medical masks when physical distancing isn't possible, he said.

Many stores now have clear signage indicating that customers must wear masks before entering. Toronto Public Health says people do not have to provide proof of medical exemptions. If people don't want to wear masks in stores, the health agency says there are alternatives, such as curbside pickup. (Submitted by David Howitt)

There are legitimate medical issues — including some mental health or developmental conditions — that preclude some people from wearing masks, said Dr. Vinita Dubey, Toronto's associate medical officer of health.

City bylaws do not require people to provide proof of a medical exemption, Dubey said, but she hopes people will only claim an exemption if it's legitimate.

People who simply don't want to wear masks should pursue alternatives to going into stores, she said, such as curbside pickup.

As an emergency physician who regularly wears a mask at work, Dubey recognizes that masks take some getting used to and can feel uncomfortable at first, but she recommends people try different types if that's the case.

The data is still not clear on how much masks prevent infection for the wearer, public health experts said.

But that's why it's important for as many people as possible who can wear masks to do so when physical distancing isn't possible, Dubey said. The idea is that people protect others — especially those who are vulnerable to critical illness if they become infected — from their own germs given the possibility of asymptomatic transmission.

"I protect you with my mask; and you protect me with your mask."

How to make COVID-19 mask-wearing a habit

Like with hard-core anti-vaccination groups, people who are adamantly against masking "are a loud but typically smaller proportion of the population," Dubey said.

The key is to combat the misinformation they spread to members of the public who might be "mask-hesitant" — similar to people who are vaccine-hesitant — by providing clear, honest answers to their questions, experts said.

Some people have medical, mental health or communication issues that are legitimate reasons to be exempt from wearing a mask, says Dr. Vinita Dubey, associate medical officer of health for Toronto Public Health. She hopes people will only seek medical exemptions over masks if they truly need them. (Submitted by Keisha Mair/Toronto Public Health)

"It's those who are sitting on the fence who are actually rightly looking for information. We need to reach them and give them the information that they need at the right time," said Dubey.

"That's the group that we need to spend most of our energy on," she said, urging the public to ask health-care providers or public health authorities for information if they have questions.

It's important for medical professionals to be respectful when people ask those questions — including when they raise concerns based on misinformation, Goldenberg said.

"If there's one way to get people defensive, it is to disparage them and not to take them seriously."

About the Author

Nicole Ireland

Nicole Ireland is a CBC News journalist with a special interest in health and social justice stories. Based in Toronto, she has lived and worked in Thunder Bay, Ont.; Iqaluit, Nunavut; and Beirut, Lebanon.

@nicireland_news

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

12766 Comments The last tally before I refreshed the page

10460 Comments

Commenting is now closed for this story.

David Amos
Methinks Chucky Leblanc knows why I should give Vladislav Sobolev a call N'esy Pas?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EbL9qmanUpY

Protesting forcing to wear Masks in Fredericton New Brunswick!!!!

201 views

•Jul 19, 2020

Charles Leblanc

1.82K subscribers

https://www.linkedin.com/in/vladislav-sobolev-80220b36/?originalSubdomain=ca

Vladislav Sobolev

Vladislav has a accoun

Leader at Fearless Ontario

York, Ontario, Canada

About

Experienced Independent Business Owner in the health, wellness and fitness industry. Skilled in Life Coaching, Customer Service, Wellness Coaching, Small Business, and Entrepreneurship.

Leader

Fearless Ontario Full-time

Dates Employed Jun 2020 – Present

Employment Duration 2 mos

Location Toronto, Ontario, Canada

www.FearlessOntario.ca/JOIN Fearless Ontario is a network of independent, non-partisan, concerned citizens who want to fight to preserve our civil liberties & democracy.

https://www.fearlessontario.ca/pr_20200623

Toronto Freedom Rally June 23rd

by
12sc
on June 23, 2020

Fearless Ontario's
Freedom Rally

In Response to Randy Hillier, MPP's
Petition to End The State of Emergency

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
June 23rd, 2020

[TORONTO] - Rain or shine, to preempt the unnecessary extension to the State of Emergency by the Ontario Government, that removes democratic powers from our representatives, there will be another peaceful gathering consisting of concerned citizens, families, and small business owners who reject the extension that has irreparably damaged our livelihoods, health, and economy.
The peaceful gathering will be held in front of the Ontario Legislature at Queen’s Park from 10 AM to 1 PM in support of Randy Hillier, MPP's (Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston) petition to End the State of Emergency.
This demonstration will give a voice to those suffering as a result of the Emergency Orders created without democratic oversight, which prevents businesses and healthcare from re-opening fully.
Media are encouraged to attend to cover the rally at any time with a possible visit by Randy Hillier, MPP after Question Period at approximately 11:30 AM.
Hosted by Fearless Ontario & Hugs Over Masks
https://FearlessOntario.ca
https://www.facebook.com/hugsovermasks.ca

-30-

Contact:
Email: info@FearlessOntario.ca
Twitter: @FearlessOntario • @HugsOverMasks

Independent Business Owner

Herbalife

Dates Employed Jan 2000 – Present

Employment Duration 20 yrs 7 mos

Location Toronto, Canada Area

https://coach247.goherbalife.com/Catalog/Home/Index/en-CA

Best Sellers

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies

‏ @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
Methinks relatives of the victims, Anne McLellan, Leanne Fitch and the RCMP should study the lawsuit I filed against the Queen in Federal Court while running for a seat in the 42nd Parliament N'esy Pas?

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/07/independent-panel-slap-in-face-says.html

#nbpoli #cdnpoli

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/mass-shooting-joint-independent-review-portapique-1.5659990

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/leanne-fitch-shooting-panel-1.5660504

Former Fredericton police chief named to N.S. shooting panel

Leanne Fitch was chief during 2018 shooting when 4 people, including two officers, were killed

CBC News · Posted: Jul 23, 2020 3:30 PM AT

Fitch retired as chief of the Fredericton Police Force in June of last year. (Maria Jose Burgos/CBC)

Former Fredericton police Chief Leanne Fitch will serve on an independent panel into last April's mass killing in Nova Scotia.

Fitch served as chief during some trying times for the force, including in August 2018 when a gunman killed four people in a mass shooting, including two Fredericton police officers.

Fitch retired from the Fredericton Police Force in June of last year.

The Nova Scotia inquiry is supported by both the Nova Scotia and federal government and will look into the mass shooting that took place April 18-19.

Independent panel 'a slap in the face,' says daughter of N.S. shooting victim

A shooter killed 22 people, including one RCMP officer in a rampage that spanned several communities before being killed himself by police.

The report will be released next year and will try to determine the context in which the shootings took place and explore law enforcement's response to the incident.

While the report will be made public it is unclear if any of the panel's hearings will be open to the public.

The other members of the panel are former chief justice of Nova Scotia Michael MacDonald and Anne McLellan, the former minister of public safety and deputy prime minister in the Paul Martin government..

With files from CBC Nova Scotia

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

28 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.

David Amos
Methinks relatives of the victims, Anne McLellan, former Fredericton police Chief Leanne Fitch and the RCMP lawyers should study the lawsuit I filed against the Queen in 2015 in Federal Court of Fat Fred City while running for a seat in the 42nd Parliament.Two letters to me in 2004 from the Governor General and the former minister of public safety and deputy prime minister in the Paul Martin government were quoted verbatim out of the gate N'esy Pas?

David Amos

Content disabled

Methinks relatives of the victims, Anne McLellan, former Fredericton police Chief Leanne Fitch and the RCMP lawyers should study the lawsuit I filed against the Queen in 2015 in Federal Court of Fat Fred City while running for a seat in the 42nd Parliament.Two letters to me in 2004 from the Governor General and the former minister of public safety and deputy prime minister in the Paul Martin government were quoted verbatim out of the gate N'esy Pas?

Ray Oliver

Content disabled

Reply to @David Amos: Always about you. Always.

David Amos

Content disabled

Reply to @Ray Oliver: Do says a shill for the RCMP

Johnny Jakobs
Hopefully they tweet the results.

David Amos

Reply to @Johnny Jakobs: Trust that I already Tweeted about where to find that I have already stated the fact that in my humble opinion several of the families of victims have every right to sue the RCMP for wrongful death and should do so ASAP

James Edward
Reply to @David Amos: those people murdered on April 19 would have a case had they been notified via emergency alert (not tweet). They wouldn't have been out that morning.

Corrie Weatherfield

"humble" . . . that'll be the day !

David Amos

Reply to @James Edward: Who goofed???

David Amos
Reply to @Corrie Weatherfield: Methinks a common expression at least it got a rise out a shill working for the Queen N'esy Pas?

Matt Steele
" Anne McLellan, the former minister of public safety and deputy prime minister in the Paul Martin " liberal " government "..........that says a lot right there . I wonder how much she will end up billing the taxpayer per hour . I am surprised that they didn't appoint Frank McKenna and Brian Gallant as well so that they could all get a piece of the taxpayer funded pie .

David Amos

Reply to @Matt Steele: Methinks Anne McLellan Frank McKenna, Brian Gallant and you as well should check my work that I began arguing in Federal Court in 2015 when Harper was the PM and Fitch was the Chief of the Fat Fred City Finest N'eay Pas?

Greg Miller
Former Chief of Police in Fredericton--really? Given her history--why?

James Edward

Reply to @Greg Miller: she's experienced with scandal, and seemingly making it go away.

David Amos

Reply to @James Edward: Oh So True

John McInerney
The enquiry announced today is a wise and reasonable response to calls for a public and independent enquiry. It will avoid the appearance of a sham trial looking for guilty parties
with seems to be the objective of those wishing to prolong this real life drama. The factual information will be available for everyone but no public retributions and hangings.

Bob Smith

Reply to @John McInerney: The facts deserve more than a "we'll try to do better next time" result. The grieving families have legitimate questions about what happened during the hours of the incident. The public has concerns about what occurred during that time. Sweeping it all behind closed doors with no indications anything new will be revealed makes this look like a whitewash in the end.

David Amos

Reply to @Bob Smith: Methinks many agree with me in that it already is a whitewash out of the gate N'esy Pas?

Rob Belyea
According to the RCMP operations manual, they don't have to give truthful answers to any questions unless in a court of law. This independent panel has now authority to compel a truthful response. This will be a coverup like Meyerthorpe and Moncton. It's a shame to drag a good person like Chief Fitch through the mud of a poor panel.

David Amos

Reply to @Rob Belyea: Surely you jest

Ray Bungay
Sadly this review is not only a waste of time but a waste of dollars when either the Feds or Nova Scotia can afford it. But worse of all this does nothing, nada, zero For the victims families and friends or the community of Colchester Nova Scotia. It seems the RCMP hugely failed on this operation and both governments are that is ok. I hope the good people there keep on protesting until they get a full no facts hidden inquiry.

David Amos

Reply to @Ray Bungay: Imagine me agreeing with you again?

Methinks amazing things never cease N'esy Pas?

David Stairs

another slap in the face for those effected in Nova Scotia...all three of those chosen could not find the source of a bad Oder....and to not have a open inquiry with sworn testimony...what are they covering up....

David Amos

Content disabled

Reply to @David Stairs: I believe you mentioned what they could not find Hence that is likely why they were chosen.

Emery Hyslop-Margison

If I remember correctly, this individual struggled mightily to run her own department effectively? Why, therefore, is she considered qualified to serve on this investigative body? Looks like some form of patronage (again) to me. More tax dollars dumped into the trough.

James Edward

Reply to @Emery Hyslop-Margison: you remember correctly

David Amos

Reply to @James Edward: YUP

Robert L. Brown

No liberals here move on

David Amos

Reply to @Robert L. Brown: Surely you jest

Bob Smith

I don't like how this panel is shaping up. No one can be made to testify and the hearings may be held behind closed doors. Given some of the actions that were made public about how the police handled the shooting during the hours in question, you'd think they'd be addressed openly.

James Edward

Reply to @Bob Smith: not going to release until Aug 2021? This thing stinks. They need a public inquiry, run by the citizens Period. End of story.

David Amos

Content disabled

Reply to @James Edward: YUP

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/mass-shooting-joint-independent-review-portapique-1.5659990

Independent panel 'a slap in the face,' says daughter of N.S. shooting victim

Families of Nova Scotia victims asked for public inquiry, but review announced instead

Emma Davie, Alex Cooke · CBC News · Posted: Jul 23, 2020 9:59 AM AT

Darcy Dobson and Nick Beaton, who lost loved ones in April's mass shootings in Nova Scotia, say they're upset by the decision to go with an independent review instead of a public inquiry. (CBC)

Some family members of the 22 victims of the Nova Scotia mass shooting say they're deeply disappointed by the announcement Thursday of an independent review into the tragedy.

Relatives have been calling for a public inquiry, but today the provincial and federal governments stopped short of that, instead announcing there will be an independent three-person panel led by the province's former top judge.

"I'm not really happy. I really feel that a full inquiry is necessary," said Charlene Bagley, who lost her father, Tom Bagley, in the shooting.

"We all deserve the truth and full transparency and I don't feel like we're going to get that."

The review means it is up to the panel to decide whether any hearings will be held in public. All documents and information collected as part of the review will also be kept confidential.

Bagley said she can't speak for the other families, but she said she wouldn't mind those aspects being made public if it means she gets the answers she's seeking.

"I don't want all the details [of] what happened to my father to be known," she said. "But … if it helps move forward and that we can learn from this, then I would be OK with it."

Tom Bagley died in the shooting. His daughter says she wants a full public inquiry into the tragedy. (Charlene Bagley/Facebook)

The panel's report, which is due next year and will be made public, will consider the causes, context and circumstances that led to the incident — including gender-based and intimate-partner violence and the gunman's access to firearms — as well as the police response and communications.

It will also address the steps taken to inform, support and engage victims, families and other people affected by the tragedy.

The panel will be chaired by former chief justice of Nova Scotia Michael MacDonald.

The other panel members are former deputy prime minister Anne McLellan, who is currently a senior adviser with the law firm Bennett Jones LLP, and Leanne Fitch, a former chief of the Fredericton Police Force.

All three panel members are from the Maritimes

22 people killed

On April 18 and 19, a lone gunman went on a 13-hour shooting rampage that began in the small community of Portapique and ended at a gas station in Enfield, 150 kilometres away. Twenty-two people were killed, and the gunman was shot dead by police.

On Wednesday, about 280 people marched to the RCMP detachment in Bible Hill, N.S., to call for an inquiry to be held, after months of waiting for answers.

Nick Beaton, whose wife, Kristen Beaton, was killed in the April massacre, said not getting answers these past few months has been 'hell.' He was one of almost 300 people who marched on Wednesday, calling for a public inquiry. (Andrew Vaughan/The Canadian Press)

Nick Beaton, whose wife, Kristen Beaton, was killed in the shooting along with their unborn child, said he's upset with the decision to go with a review instead of an inquiry.

"They say they're worried about our thoughts and feelings. This upsets us more than anything."
Beaton said he and the other families are "not done fighting" until they get the answers they've asked for.

Darcy Dobson, the daughter of victim Heather O'Brien, agreed.

"We're disappointed. It's a slap in the face, for sure," she said.

"Today, [Justice Minister] Mark Furey said in his release that he didn't want to hurt the families anymore, and what you're doing is hurting us by not giving us what we asked for."

From left, the three panelists are Leanne Fitch, Anne McLellan and Michael MacDonald. (The Canadian Press/CBC News)

In a news conference Thursday, Furey said the panel members were chosen because of their experience in fact-finding and independence, in-depth knowledge of public safety, policing and gender-based and intimate-partner violence, as well as their understanding of shared federal-provincial relations and responsibilities.

Furey has said on a number of occasions that while the province was committed to a review, it would not lead it.

On Thursday, he said they reviewed all options, including a public inquiry, but this process provided the "most timely opportunity" for the earliest responses and setting up a panel.

"We heard loud and clear that people wanted early changes," Furey said, noting that it can take years to set up an inquiry and that a review wouldn't take as long.

Families of N.S. mass killing victims push for public inquiry

Details on mass shooting inquiry to be released next week, N.S. justice minister says

In response to this explanation, Dobson said: "We never asked for quick. We asked for the truth."

The review process also does not include some of the powers granted in a public inquiry, such as information provided under oath, the ability to subpoena and binding recommendations.

Federal Public Safety Minister Bill Blair said both levels of government are "absolutely committed" to this review and its recommendations.

"This is the right approach and we believe we have the right people to do the work and they have the necessary authorities to get Nova Scotians the answers they deserve," Blair said.

Families briefed

Furey said he spoke to the families earlier this week and that he wanted to personally tell them about the review panel ahead of time.

"We must commit to caring for and thinking of them first," he said.

He said he heard from them and is aware that a public inquiry is the mechanism "that they would prefer." But, he said, after looking at all of the factors, the approach of the review and the strength of the panel gives them the authority to get families the answers they need.

Bagley, who lost her father, said the families were given the opportunity to ask questions about this during their briefing, but she said when she submitted her written question, it was reworded and not properly answered.

"I feel like if they can't be transparent even there, how am I to trust that they're going to be transparent when it comes to the real thing?" she said.

Beaton also said he wasn't satisfied with the meeting with Furey.

"Any question that we asked him, he said, 'I can't speak on behalf of the panel,' " Beaton said.

Heather O'Brien, left, and Kristen Beaton both worked for the Victorian Order of Nurses and were victims of the shootings. (GoFundMe/The Canadian Press/GoFundMe/The Canadian Press)

Furey and Blair said all agencies and organizations under their jurisdiction will participate fully in the review, including the RCMP, the Canada Firearms Program, Canada Border Services Agency, the Criminal Intelligence Service and the national Alert Ready Program.

The RCMP released a statement on Thursday afternoon saying it supports the independent review and "will co-operate fully," ensuring the panel has all "available information required."

The panel can also notify the ministers, as well as the public, if an institution or individual fails to co-operate within a reasonable time or claims they cannot due to things like solicitor-client privilege or concerns an ongoing police investigation could be compromised.

"We've empowered the panel to speak publicly at any time, whether it's over the course of their work, in accessing information or anyone interfering in the independence of that panel," Furey said.

Final report in August

The panel, however, has no power to challenge claims of privilege, and can only make note of them.

The panel will provide an interim report to the ministers by Feb. 28, 2021. The final report will be delivered by Aug. 31, 2021. The ministers will receive the reports first and then make them public.

Furey said the panel members are prepared to start work right away, but there are a few administrative matters to get through first, such as finding office space.

The cost of the review will be shared equally between the two levels of government, but there is no set budget yet.

Reaction from opposition parties

Nova Scotia's opposition parties are also calling for an inquiry instead of a review.

In a written statement, Tim Houston, leader of the Progressive Conservatives, described the review as "a complete and utter abdication of responsibility" and "cover your ass politics."

"Premier Stephen McNeil promised Nova Scotians that by waiting for months, the chosen mechanism would ensure change across the country. We now know that wasn't true," the statement said.

"Nova Scotians should be angry, not only because they have been cheated out of an inquiry that is essential to getting answers, but because their Premier and Prime Minister are attempting to fool them into thinking this direction is in their best interest. We need to know who will be held accountable for this short-sighted decision."

Also in a statement, NDP leader Gary Burrill said the decision to forgo an inquiry in favour of the review was "hurtful and disappointing."

"Across Nova Scotia, many organizations and experts, the public in general, and most significantly, the families, have properly called for a public inquiry into the worst mass shooting in our country's history," Burrill's statement said. "The government is mistaken in deciding to do something less."

WATCH | Disappointed by independent review, families of N.S. shooting victims demand public inquiry:

The federal and Nova Scotia governments have ordered a joint independent review of April's mass killing in Nova Scotia that left 22 people dead. It's come as a disappointment for the families who want to see a public inquiry instead. 4:35

Corrections

An earlier version of this story said a public inquiry into the Portapique mass shootings would be announced today. In fact, it is a joint independent review that is being announced. This story has been corrected.

Jul 23, 2020 10:54 AM AT

With files from Shaina Luck

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

2 comments:

Unknown8 January 2021 at 12:58
Do you need an urgent loan of any kind? Loans to liquidate debts or need to loan to improve your business have you been rejected by any other banks and financial institutions? Do you need a loan or a mortgage? This is the place to look, we are here to solve all your financial problems. We borrow money for the public. Need financial help with a bad credit in need of money. To pay for a commercial investment at a reasonable rate of 3%, let me use this method to inform you that we are providing reliable and helpful assistance and we will be ready to lend you. Contact us today by email: daveloganloanfirm@gmail.com Call/Text: +1(501)800-0690 And whatsapp: +1 (315) 640-3560

NEED A LOAN?
Ask Me.
DAVE19 August 2021 at 01:47
This is really a nice information on how to Buy Bulk CBC Isolate | Powder Online. Must necessary to share this blog, This comment will help to get full knowledge on other 420 Extracts Buy Bulk Delta 9 THC Distillate Jars, and will also help for the coming future THANKS.

For more infor please contact the following.....

CALL/TEXT/WHATSAPP >>>>>>>>>
+1(424) 235 3914

EMAIL >>>>>>>>> support@420labextracts.COM

Thursday, 23 July 2020

Independent panel 'a slap in the face,' says daughter of N.S. shooting victim

Message blocked

Citizens Rise Against Corruption in Trudeau Government

N.S. evaluating N.B. proposal to collaborate on serious incident response team

Director of Nova Scotia SIRT says momentum driven by fatal police shootings of Chantel Moore, Rodney Levi

Former government was trying to get 'consensus' on SIRT

Support from police chiefs

Estimated to use SIRT 21 times per year

Details of proposed partnership unclear

2019 review recommended NB develop a SIRT

About the Author

Anti-masking groups draw from anti-vaccination playbook to spread misinformation

Downplaying dangers of COVID-19, taking research out of context are common strategies, experts say

'Harmful outcomes'

Mistrust of health authorities fuels misinformation

Lawsuit alleges vaccine conspiracy

'Cherry-picking' data

Emerging research, changing guidance

About the Author

Protesting forcing to wear Masks in Fredericton New Brunswick!!!!

Vladislav Sobolev

Leader at Fearless Ontario

Toronto Freedom Rally June 23rd

Fearless Ontario'sFreedom Rally

In Response to Randy Hillier, MPP's Petition to End The State of Emergency

Best Sellers

Former Fredericton police chief named to N.S. shooting panel

Leanne Fitch was chief during 2018 shooting when 4 people, including two officers, were killed

Independent panel 'a slap in the face,' says daughter of N.S. shooting victim

Families of Nova Scotia victims asked for public inquiry, but review announced instead

22 people killed

Families briefed

Final report in August

Reaction from opposition parties

Corrections

2 comments:

Fearless Ontario's
Freedom Rally

In Response to Randy Hillier, MPP's
Petition to End The State of Emergency