---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 23:23:15 +0000
Subject: RE: YO Higgy Methinks your buddy Chucky Leblanc missed quite
a Freeman circus in Fat Fred City today N'esy Pas Chief Roger Brown?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.
If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.
Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.
Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
pour examen et considération.
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144 or by email
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.
Methinks all wannabe "Freemen" should study the law a lot closer N'esy Pas?
Nicholas Pereira was live
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rK6Tb75RRqQ&ab_channel=CharlesLeblanc
Fighting the Justice System in the Fredericton Justice Building!!!!
BTW the big talking Robby Baby Menard is originally from New Brunswick N'esy Pas?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_xYH2GUyN8&ab_channel=WorldFreemanSociety
Interview with Robert Menard Director of the World Freeman Society
138 Comments
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDoxdMhK7a8&t=28s&ab_channel=WorldFreemanSociety
UNCUT! CBC Full Interview with Rob Menard.
66 Comments
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpoBknyFppM&ab_channel=DavidAmos
Re The Wannabe Freemen in Fat Fred City on the Ides of March 2010
1 Comment
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YGsGhrbn7c&ab_channel=mrmitee
Nova Scotia Securities Commission - Bureaucracy AMOK
45 Comments
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54CWPYJK4qI&ab_channel=mrmitee
CBC National: Freeman Rob Menard's Response To Feature Investigation In Canada
188 Comments
Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta
Citation: Meads v. Meads, 2012 ABQB 571
Date: 20120918
Docket: 4803 155609
Registry: Edmonton
|
Between:
Crystal Lynne Meads
Appellant - and -
Dennis Larry Meads
Respondent
|
|
Editorial Notice: On behalf of the Government of Alberta personal data identifiers have been removed from this unofficial electronic version of the judgment. |
_______________________________________________________
of the
_______________________________________________________
Table of Contents
I.......... Introduction to Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Argument [OPCA] Litigants.... 1
II........ The Present Litigation....................................................................................................... 2
A. Prior Activity.......................................................................................................... 3
B. The June 8, 2012 Hearing..................................................................................... 4
C. Subsequent Developments.................................................................................... 8
D. The Purposes of These Reasons......................................................................... 12
1. Ms. Meads................................................................................................. 12
2. Mr. Meads................................................................................................. 12
3. A Broad Set of OPCA Concepts and Materials....................................... 13
4. Mr. Meads Faces No Unexpected Sanction.............................................. 13
III....... Overview of these Reasons.............................................................................................. 14
IV....... The OPCA Phenomenon................................................................................................ 15
A. Characteristics of OPCA Group Members....................................................... 17
B. The OPCA Guru................................................................................................. 18
1. Russell Porisky and the Paradigm Education Group................................ 18
2. Other Canadian Gurus............................................................................... 21
a. David Kevin Lindsay..................................................................... 21
b. John Ruiz Dempsey....................................................................... 25
c. Robert Arthur Menard................................................................... 28
d. Eldon Gerald Warman.................................................................. 29
e. David J. Lavigne............................................................................ 30
f. Edward Jay Robin Belanger.......................................................... 32
g. Other Gurus................................................................................... 33
h. Mr. Meads Guru............................................................................ 34
3. How Gurus Operate.................................................................................. 35
C. OPCA Litigants................................................................................................... 36
D. OPCA Movements............................................................................................... 38
1. Detaxers..................................................................................................... 39
2. Freemen-on-the-Land................................................................................ 39
3. Sovereign Men or Sovereign Citizens....................................................... 40
4. The Church of the Ecumenical Redemption International [CERI]........... 41
5. Moorish Law............................................................................................. 42
6. Conclusion - OPCA Movements............................................................... 44
V........ Indicia of OPCA Litigants, Litigation, and Strategies.................................................. 44
A. Documentary Material........................................................................................ 45
1. Name Motifs.............................................................................................. 45
2. Document Formalities and Markings........................................................ 47
3. Specific Phrases and Language................................................................. 48
4. Legislation and Legal Documents............................................................. 50
5. Atypical Mailing Addresses...................................................................... 51
6. Conclusion and Summary of Documentary Indicia.................................. 52
B. In Court Conduct................................................................................................ 53
1. Demands.................................................................................................... 53
2. Documentation.......................................................................................... 54
3. Names and Identification.......................................................................... 54
4. Court Authority or Jurisdiction................................................................. 55
5. Other In-Court Motifs............................................................................... 56
6. Summary of In-Court Indicia.................................................................... 57
C. Conclusion - OPCA Indicia................................................................................ 58
1. Procedural Responses to Suspected OPCA Documents........................... 58
2. Courtroom Procedure Responses to Suspected OPCA Litigants............. 59
VI....... OPCA Concepts and Arguments................................................................................... 60
A. The Litigant is Not Subject to Court Authority................................................ 60
1. Restricted Court Jurisdiction..................................................................... 61
a. Admiralty or Military Courts......................................................... 61
b. Notaries are the Real Judges......................................................... 62
c. Religion or Religious Belief Trumps the Courts............................. 63
2. Defective Court Authority........................................................................ 65
a. Oaths............................................................................................. 65
b. The Court Proves It Has Jurisdiction and Acts Fairly................... 66
c. Court Formalities.......................................................................... 66
d. The State is Defective..................................................................... 67
e. Conclusion - Defective Court Authority......................................... 67
3. Immune to Court Jurisdiction - Magic Hats.............................................. 68
a. I Belong to an Exempt Group........................................................ 69
b. I Declare Myself Immune............................................................... 71
c. I Have Been Incorrectly Identified................................................. 72
d. I Am Subject to a Different Law..................................................... 73
e. Conscientious Objector.................................................................. 75
f. Tax-Related Magic Hats................................................................ 76
g. Miscellaneous................................................................................ 78
4. The Inherent Authority of Provincial Superior Courts.............................. 79
a. Superior Courts of Inherent Jurisdiction........................................ 79
b. Procedural Jurisdiction................................................................. 80
c. Subject Jurisdiction........................................................................ 82
d. Inherent Jurisdiction vs. OPCA Strategies and Concepts.............. 84
B. Obligation Requires Agreement......................................................................... 85
1. Defeating Legislation................................................................................ 86
2. Everything is a Contract............................................................................ 86
3. Consent is Required.................................................................................. 89
4. Conclusion - Obligation Requires Agreement........................................... 91
5. Court Misconduct by Everything is a Contract and Consent is Required Litigants 91
C. Double/Split Persons............................................................................................ 92
1. Unshackling the Strawman........................................................................ 94
2. Dividing Oneself........................................................................................ 94
3. In-Court Behaviour of the Divided Person................................................ 96
4. Conclusion - Double/Split Person Schemes............................................... 98
D. Unilateral Agreements......................................................................................... 99
1. The Legal Effect of a Foisted Agreement............................................... 101
2. Common Uses of Unilateral Agreements................................................ 105
a. To Create or Assert an Obligation............................................... 105
b. To Discharge an Obligation or Dismiss a Lawsuit...................... 108
c. Foisted Duties, Agency, or Fiduciary Status................................ 110
d. Copyright and Trade-mark.......................................................... 110
3. Fee Schedules.......................................................................................... 112
a. Disproportionate and Unlawful Penalties................................... 114
b. The Targets and Intended Effect of Fee Schedules...................... 115
4. Effect of Unilateral Agreements............................................................. 116
E. Money for Nothing Schemes............................................................................. 117
1. Accept for Value / A4V.......................................................................... 117
2. Bill Consumer Purchases......................................................................... 120
3. Miscellaneous Money for Nothing Schemes........................................... 121
F. Legal Effect and Character of OPCA Arguments......................................... 121
1. OPCA Strategies that Deny Court Authority......................................... 121
a. An OPCA Argument that Denies Court Authority Cannot Succeed Due to the Courts Inherent Authority........................................................................ 121
b. An OPCA Argument that Denies Court Authority is Intrinsically Frivolous and Vexatious..................................................................................................... 122
c. An OPCA Argument that Denies Court Authority May Be Contempt of Court Authority..................................................................................................... 123
i. Denial of Tax Obligation Evades Tax............................. 123
ii. Denial of Firearms Restrictions Proves Intent for Illegal Possession 124
iii. Denial of Court Authority May Prove the Intent to Engage in Contempt of Court......................................................................................... 125
iv. Other Government Authorities........................................ 127
2. Other OPCA Strategies........................................................................... 127
3. Responses to OPCA Strategies............................................................... 128
a. Strike Actions, Motions, and Defences......................................... 128
b. Punitive Damages........................................................................ 128
c. Elevated Costs............................................................................. 129
d. Order Security for Costs.............................................................. 131
e. Fines............................................................................................ 132
f. One Judge Remaining on a File.................................................. 132
4. Responses to OPCA Litigants and Gurus............................................... 133
a. Vexatious Litigant Status.............................................................. 133
b. Deny Status as a Representative.................................................. 133
5. Conclusion - Responses to OPCA Litigation and Litigants.................... 134
VII..... Review............................................................................................................................ 135
A. Judiciary............................................................................................................. 136
B. Lawyers.............................................................................................................. 138
1. A Lawyers Duties.................................................................................... 138
a. Notarization of OPCA Materials................................................. 138
b. Triage: Identification of Legal Issues........................................... 139
2. Education................................................................................................ 139
a. Judges and Courts....................................................................... 139
b. The OPCA Litigant...................................................................... 140
3. Conclusion - Lawyers and OPCA Litigation.......................................... 141
C. Target Litigants................................................................................................. 141
D. OPCA Litigants................................................................................................. 141
E. OPCA Gurus..................................................................................................... 143
VIII.... Application of These Reasons to the Meads v. Meads Litigation............................... 144
A. Ms. Meads.......................................................................................................... 144
1. Case Management................................................................................... 144
2. Disclosure by Mr. Meads......................................................................... 144
B. Mr. Meads.......................................................................................................... 145
1. Pre-Hearing Activities............................................................................. 145
a. The February 15, 2011 Document.............................................. 146
b. The March 3, 2011 Document..................................................... 147
c. The April 27, 2012 Documents.................................................... 148
2. The June 8, 2012 Hearing........................................................................ 151
3. The June 19 and June 21, 2012 Documents............................................ 153
4. Conclusion............................................................................................... 154
Appendix A - Meads Fee Schedule.......................................................................................... 157
Appendix B - Meads Copyright and Trademark Notice....................................................... 176
Where there is no common power, there is no law, where no law, no injustice.
Force, and fraud, are in war the two cardinal virtues.
...
The laws are of no power to protect them, without a sword in the hands of a man, or men, to cause those laws to be put in execution.
...
And law was brought into the world for nothing else but to limit the natural liberty of particular men in such manner as they might not hurt, but assist one another, and join together against a common enemy.
Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan (Forgotten Books, 2008), at pp. 87, 147, 184
I. Introduction to Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Argument [“OPCA”] Litigants
[1] This Court has developed a new awareness and understanding of a category of vexatious litigant. As we shall see, while there is often a lack of homogeneity, and some individuals or groups have no name or special identity, they (by their own admission or by descriptions given by others) often fall into the following descriptions: Detaxers; Freemen or Freemen-on-the-Land; Sovereign Men or Sovereign Citizens; Church of the Ecumenical Redemption International (CERI); Moorish Law; and other labels - there is no closed list. In the absence of a better moniker, I have collectively labelled them as Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Argument litigants [“OPCA litigants”], to functionally define them collectively for what they literally are. These persons employ a collection of techniques and arguments promoted and sold by ‘gurus’ (as hereafter defined) to disrupt court operations and to attempt to frustrate the legal rights of governments, corporations, and individuals.
[2] Over a decade of reported cases have proven that the individual concepts advanced by OPCA litigants are invalid. What remains is to categorize these schemes and concepts, identify global defects to simplify future response to variations of identified and invalid OPCA themes, and develop court procedures and sanctions for persons who adopt and advance these vexatious litigation strategies.
[3] One participant in this matter, the Respondent Dennis Larry Meads, appears to be a sophisticated and educated person, but is also an OPCA litigant. One of the purposes of these Reasons is, through this litigant, to uncover, expose, collate, and publish the tactics employed by the OPCA community, as a part of a process to eradicate the growing abuse that these litigants direct towards the justice and legal system we otherwise enjoy in Alberta and across Canada. I will respond on a point-by-point basis to the broad spectrum of OPCA schemes, concepts, and arguments advanced in this action by Mr. Meads.
[4] OPCA litigants do not express any stereotypic beliefs other than a general rejection of court and state authority; nor do they fall into any common social or professional association. Arguments and claims of this nature emerge in all kinds of legal proceedings and all levels of Courts and tribunals. This group is unified by:
1. a characteristic set of strategies (somewhat different by group) that they employ,
2. specific but irrelevant formalities and language which they appear to believe are (or portray as) significant, and
3. the commercial sources from which their ideas and materials originate.
This category of litigant shares one other critical characteristic: they will only honour state, regulatory, contract, family, fiduciary, equitable, and criminal obligations if they feel like it. And typically, they don’t.
[5] The Meads case illustrates many characteristic features of OPCA materials, in court conduct, and litigation strategies. These Reasons will, therefore, explain my June 8, 2012 decision and provide analysis and reasoning that is available for reference and application to other similar proceedings.
[6] Naturally, my conclusions are important for these parties. However, they also are intended to assist others, who have been taken in/duped by gurus, to realize that these practices are entirely ineffective; to empower opposing parties and their counsel to take action; and as a warning to gurus that the Court will not tolerate their misconduct.
[7] As a preliminary note, I will throughout these Reasons refer to persons by their ‘normal’ names, except to illustrate various OPCA motifs and concepts. OPCA litigants frequently adopt unusual variations on personal names, for example adding irrelevant punctuation, or using unusual capital and lower case character combinations. While OPCA litigants and their gurus put special significance on these alternative nomenclature forms, these are ineffectual in law and are meaningless paper masks. Therefore, in these Reasons, I will omit spurious name forms, titles, punctuation and the like.
etc etc etc
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 23:23:15 +0000
Subject: RE: YO Higgy Methinks your buddy Chucky Leblanc missed quite
a Freeman circus in Fat Fred City today N'esy Pas Chief Roger Brown?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.
If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.
Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.
Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
pour examen et considération.
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144 or by email
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 20:18:19 -0300
Subject: YO Higgy Methinks your buddy Chucky Leblanc missed quite a
Freeman circus in Fat Fred City today N'esy Pas Chief Roger Brown?
To: "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, oldmaison
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "Roger.Brown" <Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>,
"Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino"
<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
"freedomreport.ca" <freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>, sheilagunnreid
<sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, "hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>,
"Holland, Mike (LEG)" <mike.holland@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, andremurraynow
<andremurraynow@gmail.com>, "macpherson.don"
<macpherson.don@dailygleaner.
<police@fredericton.ca>, sallybrooks25 <sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>,
evelyngreene <evelyngreene@live.ca>, bruce.fitch@gnb.ca,
Trevor.HOLDER@gnb.ca, Brian Ruhe <brian@brianruhe.ca>,
warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
https://www.facebook.com/
On 3/17/22, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 22:55:44 -0400
> Subject: Yo Andre Murrry here are a just few emails and blogs rtc for
> you and Chucky Leblanc and his old buddies Donny "Big Mac" MacPherson
> and Sotty Baby Agnew and the Irving's lawyers to review
> To: oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andremurraynow
> <andremurraynow@gmail.com>, "macpherson.don"
> <macpherson.don@dailygleaner.
> <police@fredericton.ca>, sallybrooks25 <sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>,
> evelyngreene <evelyngreene@live.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Charles LeBlanc
> To: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com
> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 10:12 AM
> Subject: [Charles Leblancs Other Blog] New comment on Another chap ban
> for life from the New Brunswick L....
>
> Charles LeBlanc has left a new comment on the post "Another chap ban
> for life from the New Brunswick L...":
>
> I don't know what you mean David?
>
> I print your comment.
>
> Everyone knows we can't email you because you're so happy in receiving
> an email that you sent it to everyone.
>
> So? There's no way to get your message out because you don't believe in
> privacy.
>
> WE just have to do it in here I guess?
>
> Post a comment.
>
https://tj.news/daily-gleaner/101824738?ref=newsletter
COURTS & CRIME
Arrest in court causes chaotic scene
Ivan Finton Hall Photo: Don MacPherson/The Daily Gleaner
Don MacPherrson || The Daily Gleaner
Chaos erupted at the Fredericton courthouse Friday morning when deputy sheriffs arrested a man who planned to represent a young woman at trial on an assault charge, and it prompted a significant police
Shayla Elizabeth Finnamore, 20, of Glenmar Drive, was scheduled to stand trial Friday morning on a charge of assaulting Fredericton police Const. Daniel LeBlanc on July 23.
Dozens of supporters attended the Justice Building to support Finnamore,
including Ivan Finton Hall, who intended to represent the defendant, even though he's not a lawyer.However, deputy sheriffs arrested Hall upon his arrival at the courthouse Friday morning, leading to a tumultuous encounter and outrage from the supporters.
The crowd berated deputy sheriffs and demanded that Hall be brought before a judge immediately.
Deputy sheriffs declined to answer the supporters' questions about why the warrant had been issued.
Many were taking cellphone photos and videos, contrary to a standing court order barring photography in the Justice Building.
Hall, 35, of Lamda Street in Saint John, has tried to represent people in various cases in New Brunswick in recent months.
Such an attempt landed him in the courthouse cells in Saint John last year, but he was released without being charged.
Court records show the warrant was issued in relation to a charge that he
obstructed a deputy sheriff in the execution of her duty at the Fredericton case was related to that movement.
When Judge Kenneth Oliver called Finnamore's case, he noted that, acting within his discretion, he was requiring all those attending court to wear face masks and to distance socially.
Deputy sheriffs prevented most of the protesters from entering the courtroom given those limitations, prompting a constant string of complaints and chatter outside the courtroom, which the judge
repeatedly asked deputy sheriffs to quell.
Eight or more Fredericton police officers attended the courthouse as added security, blocking the protesters' path to the courtroom, though no one else was arrested other than Hall.
Finnamore's parents and a couple of supporters attended court initially with the defendant. Oliver told them repeatedly to distance socially and to refrain from talking while court was in session.
The defendant ultimately accepted to go through a post charge diversion
program rather than go to trial. That means once she completes tasks set out by program administrators successfully, the Crown would then withdraw the charge.
Oliver set the case over to June 17 to see if she completes the program.
Even after court adjourned, dozens of protesters continued to mill about on the lower level of the courthouse, opposing how Finnamore's case was
handled waiting to learn what would happen with Hall.
Hall made a telephone appearance in before provincial court Judge Lucie Mathurin on Friday afternoon, and prosecutor Kathleen Jacobs said the Crown was agreeable to a release order on the condition that he attend court as required.
He objected to the court using his surname, and called the judge by her first name twice. Hall demanded to be addressed only as Ivan. He said he'd attend court only if he could depose the deputy sheriff he's alleged to have obstructed.
The judge said he could contact the Crown's office to obtain his disclosure, and she set Hall's obstruction case over to April 8 for plea.
This story has been closed for commenting.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nicholas-deangelis-britney-green-court-1.6269283
Bathurst couple charged after pandemic protest fire their lawyers
Judge briefly detained person claiming to have power of attorney for Nicholas DeAngelis and Britney Green
A Bathurst couple facing allegations they violated pandemic restrictions have fired their lawyers, and a judge temporarily detained a person claiming to represent them after arguing with that judge on Wednesday morning in Moncton.
Nicholas DeAngelis and Britney Green were arrested and charged following a protest against COVID-19 restrictions held outside Moncton city hall on Jan. 24.
It was alleged they attended an outdoor gathering of more than five people while not wearing a mask, contrary to rules in place at that time to limit the spread of COVID-19. They face other charges related to incidents on Dec. 31, 2020.
DeAngelis, 34, and Green, 32, were scheduled to appear in person in Moncton provincial court before Judge Luc Labonté on Wednesday morning. Trial dates were to be set for the charges related to the Dec. 31 charges, but the couple did not show up.
Lawyers 'terminated'
Alex Pate, a lawyer who represented them on the January charges that were already scheduled for trial, appeared and asked to be removed from the file. Ontario-based paralegal Christopher Walpole appeared on behalf of lawyer Mohamed Rashidy. Walpole asked the judge for them to be removed on the other charges.
"We received word that we are terminated as their legal representatives," Walpole told the judge by phone, saying he received that notice Tuesday afternoon.
On Oct. 20, Walpole told the court he expected the couple would plead guilty to a violation of the Emergency Measures Act and their criminal charges would then be withdrawn by Crown prosecutors.
Green and DeAngelis were also not present for that October appearance. Judge Paul Duffie told the court that day that they were denied entry to the courthouse because they wouldn't wear a face mask required to enter the building.
DeAngelis
and Green were scheduled to appear in person in a Moncton provincial
courtroom like this one on Wednesday, but neither was present. (Shane Magee/CBC)
After Walpole spoke, two people entered the courtroom and told the judge they have power of attorney for the couple. However, the judge said power of attorney isn't sufficient to represent people in provincial court if they aren't lawyers.
"Your power of attorney is useless and meaningless in this court," Labonté said, asking the two if they are lawyers.
"What court is this?" one of the two, who later said their name is Ivan Finton, repeatedly asked the judge. Finton said they aren't lawyers and don't need to be.
The judge asked if they were there to accept a trial date for the two, but Finton didn't answer and instead asked if Crown prosecutor Nicholas Comeau was present. Comeau wasn't, but another Crown was there. Finton said they were only authorized to deal with Comeau.
"Well good day," Labonté said. "Warrants of arrest will be issued for your friends, or whoever they are."
Finton questioned why, with the judge saying it was because they weren't present for their court appearance and didn't have a lawyer there representing them. Finton again started to question the judge.
Temporarily held
"No, we're done, I'm not fooling around," Labonté said.
"Neither am I," Finton said, getting into a back and forth with the judge about whether the warrants would be issued in "equity."
The judge said Finton was in contempt of court. Sheriffs led Finton from the court to holding cells in the courthouse. The second person who appeared on the couple's behalf remained seated in the public gallery, taking notes.
After about an hour, Finton was brought back into court in handcuffs and sat in the prisoner's box.
"It's clear you don't have any respect for this court," Labonté said. "Your questioning of my authority borders on contempt, but I've decided I'm not going to have a contempt hearing, and I will release you."
The judge said if trial dates could be set for Green and DeAngelis, he would not issue arrest warrants. The judge then set a trial for charges related to the December 2020 charges for Jan. 9, 2023.
Green and DeAngelis will be tried in May 2022 on the charges related to the January 2021 protest outside city hall.
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/david-robert-west-court-trial-dates-1.6377054
Riverview man detained after skipping trial released with new court dates
David Robert West faces criminal charges, allegations he violated pandemic rules
A Riverview man will be released from custody after failing to appear in court for his trial on criminal charges and allegations he violated New Brunswick's pandemic restrictions with new trial dates this spring.
David Robert West briefly appeared in Moncton provincial court by phone Tuesday morning from a remand centre. No new charges have been laid after he failed to appear in court for his trial on Feb. 17 and 18.
Judge Ronald LeBlanc said West would need to obey release conditions that include appearing in court as required.
"This is a court order you must respect at all times," LeBlanc said, adding if he breaches the order he could be taken into custody again.
"Yes, that's clear," West said.
West was among five people arrested and charged following a
protest outside Moncton city hall Jan. 24, 2021. (Guy
LeBlanc/Radio-Canada)
West was among five people arrested and charged following a protest against COVID-19 restrictions in Moncton in January 2021.
It's alleged he violated the province's Emergency Measures Act on Dec. 31, 2020, in Moncton, on Jan. 22, 2021, in Shediac and on Jan. 24, 2021, in Moncton.
He also faces charges from Dec. 31, 2020, of causing a disturbance, damaging property, resisting police, and obstructing police at a Moncton grocery store.
He was scheduled to stand trial on the charges last month but wasn't present in the courtroom and didn't have a lawyer representing him.
On the first day, West was among about 40 people protesting outside the courthouse.
About 40 people were outside the courthouse protesting
shortly after West was scheduled to appear in court last month. (Shane
Magee/CBC)
West and others in the crowd attempted to enter the courthouse, which requires wearing masks, but didn't get past security.
In the courtroom, the judge that day said West had been told he would need a valid medical exemption to not wear a mask in the courthouse.
Since he wasn't present on both days, warrants were issued.
He was arrested sometime after that and held in custody until Tuesday's appearance. On Monday, the provincial court docket had indicated West would appear in court Wednesday for a bail hearing.
But on Tuesday, the Crown prosecutor consented to his release with conditions and new trial dates.
West will be tried April 13 on the charges from January 2021. He is scheduled to be tried on the December 2020 charges on May 18.
LeBlanc, the judge, asked if he has a lawyer. West said he doesn't and intends to be represented by a person he identified as Ivan Finton.
Finton attempted to represent two others arrested with West last year claiming to have "power of attorney" for the pair. However, he argued with a judge and was briefly detained in courthouse holding cells.
Finton was among the group of about 40 people outside the courthouse last month with West, telling the crowd they would try to take West's case to the Supreme Court of Canada.
---------- Original message ----------
From: BARRY WINTERS < sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 01:36:49 -0600 (MDT)
Subject: Re: Ms Blatchford please allow me to introduce you to Google's lawyer David Drummond and Mr Baconfat's buddies in the Daily Gleaner Gisele McKnight and Dastardly Don MacPherson
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Oh dear....blah blah blah. What desperate self-serving shite!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2c5wSv6ckCA&ab_channel=GoogleStudents
Fireside Chat with Google Chief Legal Officer, David Drummond
Google Asks Permission To Publish Info About FISA Requests
Google was recently allowed to release general data about national security letters it receives, as seen in this chart. The company is now asking the U.S. government to allow it to publish similar data on national security requests, including those made under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
As Google and other large tech companies cope with the aftermath of recent reports that the National Security Agency has had broad access to their users' data, the search giant is asking the U.S. government for permission to publish the number of national security requests it receives, including those made under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
In a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder and FBI Director Robert Mueller, Google's chief legal officer, David Drummond, said that government nondisclosure obligations are keeping the company from being able to ease public concerns about the privacy and security of users' data.
Noting that the search and advertising company "has worked tremendously hard over the past fifteen years to earn our users' trust," Drummond wrote that Google's inability to disclose "the number of FISA national security requests that Google receives, as well as the number of accounts covered by those requests" fuels speculation that the company has given the U.S. government free access to all its users' data. That speculation, Drummond wrote, is "simply untrue."
Google is seeking to publish the total number of national security requests it receives, including FISA disclosures, and to publish information about their scope.
"Google's numbers would clearly show that our compliance with these requests falls far short of the claims being made," Drummond wrote.
He also said that Google has "consistently pushed back on overly broad government requests for our users' data."
Drummond thanked Holder and Mueller for allowing Google to say publicly how many national security letters it receives, information the company was allowed to publish for the first time in early March. Saying that there had been "no adverse consequences," Drummond said he sees the current request to release FISA data in a similar light.
"Transparency here will likewise serve the public interest without harming national security," he wrote.
Google keeps track of requests to remove content and to see users' data on its Transparency Report, where it lists such activity for each country in which the company does business.
https://radaronline.com/p/super-pumped-david-drummond-love-child-affair-details/
SuperScandal: Google Exec Who Backed Uber Trashed By Secret Love Child Baby Mama
Mar. 18 2022, Published 5:26 p.m. ET
Super Pumped: The Battle for Uber details the tumultuous startup of the transport company, and although it shows the incredible rise and fall of CEO Travis Kalanick, a scandal involving one of the Google executives who backed the ridesharing app might be even more shocking.
David Drummond, portrayed by actor Damon Gupton on the gripping SHOWTIME series, made headlines years ago for his relationship with former senior contracts manager Jennifer Blakely.
In August 2019, she detailed their alleged extramarital affair that resulted in a pregnancy, claiming in a now-deleted blog post on Medium that Drummond later abandoned her and their child. The tryst had been previously reported by The New York Times in an expose of sexual misconduct allegations against another top executive, but it wasn’t until after Blakely left Google that she decided to share more details about what allegedly took place with Drummond.
According to Blakely, she was aware that Drummond was married and a father by the time they met, however, he allegedly told her that he was “estranged” from his wife. The former contracts manager said their entanglement began in 2004 and the following year, she was pregnant with his child, later suffering a miscarriage. In 2006, she was expecting again and Blakely said Drummond “assured me of his imminent divorce” prior to the arrival of their son in May 2007. Drummond stayed married and continued to have affairs within the company, Blakely alleged.
Drummond, who was Chief Legal Officer of Alphabet [Google’s Parent Company] when their son was born, and Blakely were prohibited from having a romantic relationship due to a new policy at Google at the time. As a result, she was transferred to sales, and apparently Drummond later offered to support Blakely financially.
“Since he was living with our son and me, I took this as a further sign of commitment,” Blakely wrote. “I felt confident that he loved us and would protect us and so I quit Google, signing whatever documents they required because likewise, I wanted to protect him.”
Blakely said things took an unfortunate turn when Drummond abandoned both her and their son in 2008. “Finally, I sent him a text message asking him when we could expect him home,” Blakely said. “He responded, ‘Don’t expect me back. I’m never coming back.’ And he didn’t.”
Blakely claimed it wasn’t until their son turned four that their custody arrangement was in place.
Drummond later defended himself in a statement to Buzzfeed, noting, “It’s not a secret that Jennifer and I had a difficult breakup 10 years ago. I am far from perfect and I regret my part in that. Her account raises many claims about us and other people, including our son and my former wife.”
“As you would expect, there are two sides to all of the conversations and details Jennifer recounts, and I take a very different view about what happened,” he continued, adding he spoke personally to Blakely and his employer about it. “I do want to address one claim that touches on professional matters. Other than Jennifer, I never started a relationship with anyone else who was working at Google or Alphabet. Any suggestion otherwise is simply untrue. I know Jennifer feels wronged and [I] understand that she wants to speak out about it. But I won’t be getting into a public back and forth about these personal matters.”
---------- Original message ----------- From: "MacPherson, Don" <macpherson.don@dailygleaner.
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 07:29:42 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Ms Blatchford please allow me to introduce
you to Google's lawyer David Drummond and Mr Baconfat's buddies in the
Daily Gleaner Gisele McKnight and Dastardly Don MacPherson
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I'll be out of the office on vacation from Aug. 30 to Sept. 8,
returning Sept. 9.
---------- Original message ---------- From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 04:29:36 -0300
Subject: Ms Blatchford please allow me to introduce you to Google's
lawyer David Drummond and Mr Baconfat's buddies in the Daily Gleaner
Gisele McKnight and Dastardly Don MacPherson
To: cblatchford@postmedia.com, sheena.goodyear@sunmedia.ca, news957
< news957@rogers.com>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, newsroom
< newsroom@herald.ca>, "mclaughlin.heather"
< mclaughlin.heather@
< mckeen.randy@gmail.com>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
"nick.moore" <nick.moore@bellmedia.ca>
Cc: "Leanne.Fitch" <Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>, "macpherson.don"
< macpherson.don@dailygleaner.
DDrummond <DDrummond@google.com>, "bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com"
< bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com>, "jchretien@heenan.ca"
< jchretien@heenan.ca>, justmin <justmin@gov.ns.ca>, sunrayzulu
< sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, "scott.macrae" <scott.macrae@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"alain.g.leblanc" <alain.g.leblanc@rcmp-grc.gc.
< rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>
At least Google was wise enough to not fall for Agnew's and
MacPherson's bullshit like Yahoo did for the benefit of the evil
Irving Empire.
BTW the nasty Green Meanie Lawyer Menard dumped Scotty Baby Agnew at
about the same time the Irvings fired him because of all the Hell I
raised about the emails that Mr Baconfat loves to publish in an edited
form.
http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/
Sunday, September 1, 2013
More David Amos Harassment
This is an e mail from Daily Gleaner reporter (Fredericton newspaper)
Don MacPherson to David Amos....
Mr. Amos
I ask you again-politely- to please take me off your e mail list.
Unsolicited e mail is spam, and its not welcome. If you do not correct
this problem, I will contact Google and G Mail administrator of your
abuse of their e mail services.
Sincerely
Don MacPherson
and this......
From Agnew, Scott
To David Amos
David, David, David, I though you had learned your lesson about
sending unsolicited e mail. I do not want to go through this with you
again. REMOVE ME from your e mail list. Failure to do so will result
in my contacting your e mail provider (Google this time) and will
likely result in your account being closed down again, just like last
year at Yahoo.
Also since this is not the first time you have pulled this stunt,
since I've asked you nicely to remove me from your list, another e
mail from you will be regarded as harassment and I will be contacting
the RCMP.
Considering your past history and all the previous e mails I've saved,
I don't think you want this to happen. Consider this your last
warning.
Do not reply to this e mail.
Sincerely
Scott Agnew
END QUOTE
As you can all see David Amos has been threatening, stalking and
harassing people for many years.
Posted by Seren at 10:41 PM
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "McLaughlin, Heather" <mclaughlin.heather@
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 06:55:15 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Mr Baconfat We all can see you digging so
that you can copy, paste and edit as you plargarize my words Have you
ever had an original thought that was not demented?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Assignment editor Heather McLaughlin is out of the office until
Tuesday Sept. 2. Please send your emails to news@dailygleaner.com. For
personal assistance, contact Gisele McKnight at 458-6434 or Managing
Editor Anne Mooers at 458-6441 if Gisele is unavailable.
They write and blog about me so I can send them emails and blog their nonsense
Turnabout is fair play
---- Original Message -----
From: "McKnight, Gisele" McKnight.Gisele@kingscorecord.
To: lcampenella@ledger.com
Cc:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:53 PM
Subject: David Amos
Hello Lisa,
David Amos asked me to contact you. I met him last June after he became
an independent (not representing any political party) candidate in our federal
election that was held June 28. He was a candidate in our constituency of
Fundy (now called Fundy-Royal).
I wrote a profile story about him, as I did all other candidates. That
story appeared in the Kings County Record June 22. A second story, written
by one of my reporters, appeared on the same date, which was a report on
the candidates' debate held June 18.
As I recall David Amos came last of four candidates in the election.
The winner got 14,997 votes, while Amos got 358.
I have attached the two stories that appeared, as well as a photo
taken by reporter Erin Hatfield during the debate. I couldn't find the photo
that ran, but this one is very similar.
A1-debate A1-amos,David for MP 24.doc debate 2.JPG
Gisele McKnight editor
Kings County Record
Sussex, New Brunswick
Canada
506-433-1070
Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd
By Erin Hatfield
"If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
world is all screwed up, rearrange it."
The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
unofficial, theme song for the debate.
The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.
The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was
organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage
of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record
and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.
Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
other on their answers and criticizing eachothers' party leaders.
Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic
relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's
getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."
Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his
party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but
well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am
on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better
places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters
shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.
The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At
one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in
front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the
voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According to
Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and second
readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted, at
final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to
register sex offenders rather than register the property of law
abiding citizens."
The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and
women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman
yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron
spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.
Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy
Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You're out of touch," Armstrong
yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of
post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged
Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time,
anyplace," Armstrong responded.
As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate,
candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and
fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making
process for the June 28 vote.
Cutline – David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his
favourite possessions—motorcycles.
McKnight/KCR
The Unconventional Candidate
David Amos Isn't Campaigning For Your Vote, But….
By Gisele McKnight
FUNDY—He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."
Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot—David Amos.
The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife
and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from
running for office in Canada.
One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail
to meet Elections Canada requirements.
When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his
favourite place to do so—Fundy.
Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his
dissatisfaction with politicians.
"I've become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he
said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."
The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in
1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he
needed to change his life.
"I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that
sometimes in midlife."
So Amos, who'd lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners
motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952
Panhead motorcycle.
"Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact)
experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you
renew your faith in mankind – you help anyone you can, you never ask
for anything, but you take what they offer."
For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs
and conversation all over North America.
Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son
and a daughter and become a house-husband – Mr. Mom, as he calls
himself.
He also describes himself in far more colourful terms—a motorcyclist
rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed
individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud
Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."
Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his life.
"But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said.
"It's alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"
Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.
"I didn't appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door
interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can
call me. I'm not going to drive my opinions down their throats."
And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.
"I won't take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It's
not about money. It goes against what I'm fighting about."
What he's fighting for is the discussion of issues – tainted blood,
the exploitation of the Maritimes' gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
name a few.
"The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs – fishing,
farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I'm
death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
(NAFTA) out the window.
NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.
Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.
"There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
Don't necessarily vote for me, but vote."
Although…if you're going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have
your X by his name.
"I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and
say, 'what the hell.'"
Imagine if this evil shit had been published in a Google Blog about
YOU or the lawyer Vic Toews and your kin EH David Drummond?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:34:05 -0300
Subject: RE: Protect the gene pool..Kill David Amos' kids ENOUGH IS
ENOUGH EH Iggy?
To: "Ignatieff. M" <Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca>, "Jack - M.P. Layton"
< Layton.J@parl.gc.ca>, "Duceppe. G" <Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca>,
"Harper.S@parl.gc.ca" <Harper.S@parl.gc.ca>, leader@greenparty.ca,
drywallrocker <drywallrocker@hotmail.com>, "Dryden.K"
< Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca>, drbilldeagle <drbilldeagle@hotmail.com>,
drbilldeagle <drbilldeagle@earthlink.net>, Mohawk Nation News
< kahentinetha2@yahoo.com>
Cc: Barry Winters <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, vanlop1 <vanlop1@parl.gc.ca>,
danadurf <danadurf@hotmail.com>, Dan Fitzgerald <danf@danf.net>,
"oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, Richard Harris
< injusticecoalition@hotmail.
< t.j.burke@gnb.ca>, "MichaelB. Murphy" <MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca>,
"John. Foran" <John.Foran@gnb.ca>, "ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca"
< ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca>, "shawn. graham" <shawn.graham@gnb.ca>,
"graham@grahamsteele.ca" <graham@grahamsteele.ca>, Byron Prior
< alltrue@nl.rogers.com>, DannyWilliams <DannyWilliams@gov.nl.ca>,
"danny.copp@fredericton.ca" <danny.copp@fredericton.ca>,
"Barry.MacKnight" <Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.
Thursday, September 17, 2009
David Amos....the ugly "amerkan"
How many times havewe heard our favourite "amerkan" pedophile and
father of sub-human children say.."gonna make yer blog go poof?" How
many times has our US born and raised childmolester told real
Canadians..."C'Yall in court"? or "I doubledawg dare ya" Ole Amos uses
amerkan" idioms and colloqualisms because he is born and raised ...a
Yank. Ole"David Chester the Molester resorts to quoting mottos off
beer bottles "to show us he is a real Canadian", and a "klansman"
David Raymond Amos is a mongrel, he has no "heritage" but he does have
an extensive criminal and arrest record...as do his sub-human
under-evolved pig kids. That begs the question; how does a self
deluded Yank "whistleblower" in the US become a police rat here in
Canada..with a stolen "Klan".. Campbell kilt?
So our "amerka" pedophile parasite leeches "a living" of the sweat of
others and spams web-sites the world over, laughing and calling
himself "mean ole me"... whilst the world ignores him and shuns him,
and to a lesser degree Dean Roger Ray. Because they are spammers,
uneducated and perverts.
No one reads either of these two's "truth", NO one listens to them and
NO One cares about what they have to say..because they HAVE NOTHINGTO
SAY..they are uneducated and stupid. Michael Ignatief, or Jack Layton
or Stephen Harper or the Commissioner of the RCMP never see or read
David Amos plaintive bleating or threatening e mails.......
He is an ignorant, uneducated pedophile whose kids should have been
aborted and killed at age 4..partial birth abortions..the big spike
...good at any age for some sub-human Yanks
Hey Yank...I do hope you spell and write "your legal work" better than
on You Tube and blogspot!... Try going to school or getting a lobotomy
..Yank!
Oh Yeah David...poof!
Posted by Seren at 6:45 AM
3 comments:
David Raymond Amos said...
First things first Mr Baconfat53 as I promised yesterday in Youtube
byway of your latest blog about my family please allow me to
reintroduce you to my brother in law W.S. Reid Chedore and his law
firm partner the ever so sneaky political lawyer Brian Mosher. They
really should have read other blogs other than just mine in the past
few months EH Petey Baby Van Loan and Stevey Boy Harper?
http://baconfat53.blogspot.
http://www.mosherchedore.ca/
http://www.freedominion.com.
FYI Mr Baconfat just before Brian Mosher helped Petey Baby MacKay
merge the nearly dead PC party with your hero Harper's party his law
firm partner Reid Chedore witnessed two affidavits of mine that caused
me to put many a Fed panties in two countries quite in a knot and to
win FOUR judgements by default against my wife's family lawyers in the
USA. If you don't believe read the first two pages of the file found
in the following link and pick up the phone and call the lawyer
Landslide Annie camped in your neigborhood in alberta. If you don't
know how to read have your old mama bound for your ppurported promised
land check page 142 of the same file that her very sick son has
falsely claimed does not exist even though you opted to publish the
links to it in your own blog.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
One of the reasons no doubt that caused you to attack me is because I
sued one of your heroes Cardinal Bernard Francis Law in complaint
found within the file provided above EH Mr Baconfat?
Here are the judgements that you have denied receiving many times.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
On the subject of your last blog yesterday about your hero Harper
going to DC to lick Obama's nasty arse clearly you didn't read these
two files at all did ya Mr Baconfat?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
Perhaps Petey Van Loan should read his next email and study Mr
Baconfat's blog and several of his Youtube comments rather closely EH
Reid Chedore?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
September 17, 2009 9:25 AM
David Raymond Amos said...
David Raymond Amos has left a new comment on the post "Me and Bush":
Peek a BOO Reid
I suspect that it was you checking my work. Correct?
Just Dave
By Location Visit Detail
Visit 8,996
Domain Name aliant.net ? (Network)
IP Address 156.34.196.# (Aliant Telecom)
ISP Aliant Telecom
Location Continent : North America
Country : Canada (Facts)
State/Region : New Brunswick
City : Saint John
Lat/Long : 45.2667, -66.0667 (Map)
Language English (Canada) en-ca
Operating System Microsoft WinNT
Browser Internet Explorer 7.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; SLCC1; .NET
CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR
3.0.30618)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1280 x 768
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Sep 15 2009 10:42:31 am
Last Page View Sep 15 2009 10:42:31 am
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://www.bing.com/...ORM=
Search Engine bing.com
Search Words reid chedore
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-4:00
Visitor's Time Sep 15 2009 10:42:31 am
Visit Number 8,996
If you look at the post immediately above this comment you can easily
see that at least one of my Little Darlins needs a lawyer or two to
ethically protect her reputation EH? Perhaps you should study every
fucking word of this bastard's blog ASAP.
http://baconfat53.blogspot.
If nothing else at least notice where I mentioned you and the arsehole
Brian Mosher within the comments of a Youtube when my blood was
boiling yesterday as I dealt with the comments in the following two
Youtubes and the evil comments in the evil zionist Mr Baconfat's blog.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
http://www.youtube.com/
"DavidRaymondAmos
An oh so clever Zionist such as yourself Mr Baconfat should read far
more closely the emails that you have been sending to mean old me.
Have you ever heard of the lawyer Reid Chedore and his law firm
partner Brian Mosher former vice president of the Progressive
conservative party in "The Place to BE"? If not rest assured your
buddy Petey Baby Mackay certainly has
I am about to introduce you once again to the Amos family lawyer in a
big way I don't think my former Clan likes you not even a bit"
Reid before you ignore me some more or judge me harshly remember our
last three converstions then think about what your wife/my sister and
my mother will say when they become aware of what has been said of
their family as you and your lawyer and cop buddies sat by and did
nothing N'esy Pas? Reid shouldn't you do the "right " thing before you
retire and protect the public interests as per your mandate to
practice law for a fee? Why not finally get off your fat, dumb, happy
arse and make a splash and sue somebody before I do and embarass the
hell out you, all your pals and of course my former Clan?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
September 17, 2009 9:25 AM
David Raymond Amos said...
FYI Mr Baconfat as per my MO as you well know I already saved it all
and emailed it as well before you make it go "Poof" as per your MO.
September 17, 2009 9:26 AM
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Barry Winters <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:11:28 -0600
Subject: Protect the gene pool..Kill David Amos' kids
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Thursday, September 17, 2009
David Amos....the ugly "amerkan"
How many times havewe heard our favourite "amerkan" pedophile and father of
sub-human children say.."gonna make yer blog go poof?" How many times has
our US born and raised childmolester told real Canadians..."C'Yall in
court"? or "I doubledawg dare ya" Ole Amos uses amerkan" idioms and
colloqualisms because he is born and raised ...a Yank. Ole"David Chester the
Molester resorts to quoting mottos off beer bottles "to show us he is a real
Canadian", and a "klansman"
David Raymond Amos is a mongrel, he has no "heritage" but he does have an
extensive criminal and arrest record...as do his sub-human under-evolved pig
kids. That begs the question; how does a self deluded Yank "whistleblower"
in the US become a police rat here in Canada..with a stolen "Klan"..
Campbell kilt?
So our "amerka" pedophile parasite leeches "a living" of the sweat of others
and spams web-sites the world over, laughing and calling himself "mean ole
me"... whilst the world ignores him and shuns him, and to a lesser degree
Dean Roger Ray. Because they are spammers, uneducated and perverts.
No one reads either of these two's "truth", NO one listens to them and NO
One cares about what they have to say..because they HAVE NOTHINGTO SAY..they
are uneducated and stupid. Michael Ignatief, or Jack Layton or Stephen
Harper or the Commissioner of the RCMP never see or read David Amos
plaintive bleating or threatening e mails.......
He is an ignorant, uneducated pedophile whose kids should have been aborted
and killed at age 4..partial birth abortions..the big spike ...good at any
age for some sub-human Yanks
Hey Yank...I do hope you spell and write "your legal work" better than on
You Tube and blogspot!... Try going to school or getting a lobotomy ..Yank!
Oh Yeah David...poof!
Posted by Seren at 6:45 AM 0 comments
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
To: <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>; <vanlop1@parl.gc.ca>; <alltrue@nl.rogers.com>;
< Brookes.Merritt@assembly.ab.
< danadurf@hotmail.com>; <rfowlo@comcast.net>; <danf@danf.net>;
< oldmaison@yahoo.com>; <injusticecoalition@hotmail.
< MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca>; <Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca>; <Layton.J@parl.gc.ca>;
< Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca>; <leader@greenparty.ca>; <orakwa@paulcomm.ca>;
< kahentinetha2@yahoo.com>; <t.j.burke@gnb.ca>; <DannyWilliams@gov.nl.ca>;
< danny.copp@fredericton.ca>; "Sheldon Day" <gem3intucson@q.com>; "drcarley"
< drcarley@drcarley.com>; "drbilldeagle" <drbilldeagle@earthlink.net>
Cc: "kelly. lamrock" <kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca>; "executive-editor"
< executive-editor@nytimes.com>
"Matthew Talbot" <editor@thereview.on.ca>; "Edith. Cody-Rice"
< Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>; "carl. davies" <carl.davies@gnb.ca>; "tim"
< tim@dreamstreetpictures.com>; "tim. porter" <Tim.Porter@gnb.ca>; "A. True
Ott PhD ND" <atrueott@msn.com>; "rick. brewer" <rick.brewer@gnb.ca>; "rick.
miles" <rick.miles@gnb.ca>; "david" <david@davidmyles.com>;
< David.ALWARD@gnb.ca>; "robert.aitkens" <robert.aitkens@cibc.com>;
"jennifer. warren" <jennifer.warren@cibc.com>; "warren.tolman"
< warren.tolman@hklaw.com>; "tim4nm" <tim4nm@gmail.com>; "drywallrocker"
< drywallrocker@hotmail.com>; "Dryden.K" <Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca>; "ahamilton"
< ahamilton@casselsbrock.com>; "richard. dearden"
< richard.dearden@gowlings.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 1:18 PM
Subject: Fwd: [Just Dave] New comment on Me and Bush.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Raymond Amos <noreply-comment@blogger.com>
> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:09:22 -0700 (PDT)
> Subject: [Just Dave] New comment on Me and Bush.
> To: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com
>
> David Raymond Amos has left a new comment on the post "Me and Bush":
>
> It is you who is the desperate little liar Mr Baconfat. Your blog
> proves that in spades.
>
> However thanks again for proving for mean old what was sent and
> received by all the other smiling bastards you worship. Feel free to
> fly off to your purported promised land with your old Mama in tow. It
> appears that even the German Feds are concerned about you now. Methinks
> that about now would be a good time for all the Zionists in my
> nativeland to flock off. What say you whimpy?
>
> Just Dave
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 9,022
> Domain Name (Unknown)
> IP Address 91.194.84.# (Xantron Online)
> ISP Xantron Online
> Location Continent : Europe
> Country : Germany (Facts)
> State/Region : Nordrhein-Westfalen
> City : Bocholt
> Lat/Long : 51.8333, 6.6 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinNT
> Browser Internet Explorer 7.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; GTB6; SLCC1; .NET
> CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR
> 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30618)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1280 x 800
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Sep 16 2009 1:04:08 pm
> Last Page View Sep 16 2009 1:04:17 pm
> Visit Length 9 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http www.german-prox...
> Search Engine http www.german-proxy.de
> Search Words ahr0cdovl2rhdmlkyw1vcy5ibg9nc3
> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com
> Out Click 228 comments
> http://davidamos.blo...
> Time Zone UTC-6:00
> Visitor's Time Sep 16 2009 11:04:08 am
> Visit Number 9,022
>
>
> From: Barry Winters sunrayzulu@shaw.ca
> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:40:29 -0600
> Subject: Fuck you
> To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> You wrote nothing. You are uneducated, semi-literate and not a
> scintilla of the law as...the previous case has shown. I am still
> waiting for those
> four case citations.
>
> You are a liar
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> To: "Barry Winters" sunrayzulu@shaw.ca; "vanlop1" vanlop1@parl.gc.ca;
> "Byron Prior" alltrue@nl.rogers.com; Brookes.Merritt@assembly.ab.ca
> "dean Ray" deanr0032@hotmail.com; "danadurf" danadurf@hotmail.com;
> "rfowlo" rfowlo@comcast.net; "Dan Fitzgerald" danf@danf.net;
> oldmaison@yahoo.com; "Richard Harris" injusticecoalition@hotmail.com
> "MichaelB. Murphy" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca; "Ignatieff. M"
> Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca; "Jack - M.P. Layton" Layton.J@parl.gc.ca;
> "Duceppe. G" Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca; leader@greenparty.ca;
> orakwa@paulcomm.ca; kahentinetha2@yahoo.com; t.j.burke@gnb.ca
> Cc: "DannyWilliams" DannyWilliams@gov.nl.ca; danny.copp@fredericton.ca
> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 10:08 AM
> Subject: METHINKS YOU SHOULD PROOF READ YOUR BULLSHIT MORE CLOSELY EH
> MR BACONFAT?
>
> Post a comment:
> https://www.blogger.com/
>
> Unsubscribe to comments for this post:
> http://www.blogger.com/
>
> Posted by David Raymond Amos to Just Dave at Wednesday, September 16,
> 2009
YO Higgy Methinks your buddy Chucky Leblanc missed quite a Freeman circus in Fat Fred City today N'esy Pas Chief Roger Brown?
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 23:23:15 +0000
Subject: RE: YO Higgy Methinks your buddy Chucky Leblanc missed quite
a Freeman circus in Fat Fred City today N'esy Pas Chief Roger Brown?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.
If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.
Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.
Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
pour examen et considération.
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144 or by email
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 20:18:19 -0300
Subject: YO Higgy Methinks your buddy Chucky Leblanc missed quite a
Freeman circus in Fat Fred City today N'esy Pas Chief Roger Brown?
To: "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, oldmaison
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "Roger.Brown" <Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>,
"Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino"
<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
"freedomreport.ca" <freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>, sheilagunnreid
<sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, "hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>,
"Holland, Mike (LEG)" <mike.holland@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, andremurraynow
<andremurraynow@gmail.com>, "macpherson.don"
<macpherson.don@dailygleaner.
<police@fredericton.ca>, sallybrooks25 <sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>,
evelyngreene <evelyngreene@live.ca>, bruce.fitch@gnb.ca,
Trevor.HOLDER@gnb.ca, Brian Ruhe <brian@brianruhe.ca>,
warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
https://www.facebook.com/
On 3/17/22, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 22:55:44 -0400
> Subject: Yo Andre Murrry here are a just few emails and blogs rtc for
> you and Chucky Leblanc and his old buddies Donny "Big Mac" MacPherson
> and Sotty Baby Agnew and the Irving's lawyers to review
> To: oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andremurraynow
> <andremurraynow@gmail.com>, "macpherson.don"
> <macpherson.don@dailygleaner.
> <police@fredericton.ca>, sallybrooks25 <sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>,
> evelyngreene <evelyngreene@live.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Charles LeBlanc
> To: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com
> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 10:12 AM
> Subject: [Charles Leblancs Other Blog] New comment on Another chap ban
> for life from the New Brunswick L....
>
> Charles LeBlanc has left a new comment on the post "Another chap ban
> for life from the New Brunswick L...":
>
> I don't know what you mean David?
>
> I print your comment.
>
> Everyone knows we can't email you because you're so happy in receiving
> an email that you sent it to everyone.
>
> So? There's no way to get your message out because you don't believe in
> privacy.
>
> WE just have to do it in here I guess?
>
> Post a comment.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Scott Agnew
> To: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com
> Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2008 10:25 AM
> Subject: [Charles Leblancs Other Blog] New comment on Another chap ban
> for life from the New Brunswick L....
>
> Scott Agnew has left a new comment on the post "Another chap ban for
> life from the New Brunswick L...":
>
> David, can you give me the court docket number of one single case
> you've filed in ANY Canadian court in the last five years. Just one.
> You rant and rave about your proclivuty to sue anyone and anything you
> dislike and yet I cannot find a single reference to a court case filed
> by you in New Brunswick. If you are a man of integrity and of your
> word, please just let us all know the docket number of a single
> filing. If you cannot provide that, why then should anyone listen to
> anything you have to say? Empty words my friend. Empty words. BTW, two
> more emails from you to a particular email account and I will be able
> to provide a docket number to you for charges laid against you for
> criminal harassment.
>
> Post a comment.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Scott Agnew
> To: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com
> Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 9:04 AM
> Subject: [Gypsy-blog] New comment on Blackburn in Woodstock.
>
> Scott Agnew has left a new comment on the post "Blackburn in Woodstock":
>
> I hate to break it to Mr. Amos but none of the above comments he has
> attributed to me in fact originated with me. While I certainly have no
> argument with most of the sentiment in those comments, the fact
> remains, I did not make them. Mr. Amos will have to direct his
> paranoia elsewhere.
>
> Sincerely,
> K. Scott Agnew
>
> Post a comment.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Alison J. Menard
> To: 'David Amos'
> Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 9:15 AM
> Subject: Notice regarding your contacts
>
> Mr. Amos
>
> Please stop communicating with me immediately by telephone, cellular,
> and email and/or by any other means of communication. Your contacts
> with me are unsolicited and unwanted and I am asking you to cease and
> desist.
>
> Please also take this as your notice that should you continue to
> harass me, I will make a complaint to the police and pursue this
> matter through the criminal courts. I am a criminal lawyer and I am
> very aware of what constitutes criminal harassment and/or threats.
>
> I also have an understanding of how you operate because of information
> provided to me by my husband, Scott Agnew. I can tell you that I will
> not tolerate it.
>
> Yours truly
>
> Alison Ménard
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Agnew, Scott
> To: David Amos
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 12:38 PM
> Subject: RE: regarding your emails and phone calls to Yahoo! Inc
> Executive staff (KMM58965988V19364L0KM)
>
> David, David, David. I thought you had learned your lesson about
> sending unsolicited email. I DO NOT want to go through this with you
> again.
>
> Remove me immediately from your email list. Failure to do so will
> result in my contacting your email provider (Google this time) and
> will likely result in your account being shut down again, just like
> last year at Yahoo. Also, since this is not the first time you have
> pulled this stunt and since you have been asked nicely several times
> to remove me from your list, another email from you will be regarded
> as harassment and I will be contacting the RCMP this time. Considering
> your past history and all the previous emails I’ve saved, I don’t
> think you want that to happen.
>
> This is the only warning I will send you. Do NOT reply to this email.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> K. Scott Agnew
> Publisher, Kings County Record
> Phone: (506) 433-1070
> Fax: (506) 432-3532
> Cell: (506) 850-4939
>
> www.kingscorecord.com
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 1:23 PM
> To: Yahoo! Customer Care; oldmaison@yahoo.com; samperrier@hotmail.com;
> Agnew, Scott; susan_aitken@cbc.ca
> Cc: travelingthrew@aol.com; david.allgood@rbc.com;
> mackay.p@parl.gc.ca; stronach.b@parl.gc.ca; moore.r@parl.gc.ca;
> thompson.g@parl.gc.ca; toews.v@parl.gc.ca; day.s@parl.gc.ca;
> casey.b@parl.gc.ca; mlevine@goodmans.ca; brae@goodmans.ca;
> steve.moate@utoronto.ca; sarah.mann@rci.rogers.com;
> rep@karenyarbrough.com; alltrue@nl.rogers.com; Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: regarding your emails and phone calls to Yahoo! Inc
> Executive staff (KMM58965988V19364L0KM)
>
> I am calling Yahoo once again just after I sent this Amelia character
> proof that I am as serious as hell right after the news about Elliot
> Spitzer broke surface
>
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 7:18 PM, Yahoo! Customer Care
> <cc-concierge@cc.yahoo-inc.com
>
> Hello David,
>
> Thank you for contacting Yahoo! Customer Care.
>
> This is Amelia from the Yahoo! Executive Concierge Team. I'm writing in
> regard to the concern you filed with our executive offices. Please
> contact us at your earliest convenience. You may reply to this email or
> call us at 888-277-0811.
>
> Please note that we are available 8am to 5 pm Monday thru Friday.
>
> We thank you for your patience in this matter. In an effort to provide
> you with the best, most efficient care possible, the following
> information would be very helpful:
>
> Contact Phone Number#:
>
> Best time and day to call between 8am-5pm Pacific time (-8:00 GMT)
> Monday thru Friday:
>
> Kindest Regards,
>
> Amelia
>
> Yahoo! Customer Care Concierge Team....At your service!
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: MacPherson, Don
> To: David Amos
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 3:13 PM
> Subject: RE: Say Hey to Schreiber's lawyer Eddy Greenspan and Brian
> Mulroney for me will ya? In return I will talk to the PCO dudes about you.
>
> Mr. Amos:
>
> I ask you again – politely – please remove me from your e-mail list.
> Unsolicited e-mail is spam, and it is not welcome. If you do not
> correct this problem, I will contact Google and Gmail administrators
> to inform them of your abuse of their free e-mail system.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Don MacPherson
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 3:59 AM
> To: Harper.S@parl.gc.ca; fbinhct@leo.gov; alex@gravel2008.us;
> elliott@gravel2008.us; info@gravel2008.us; afrey@mayerbrown.com
> Cc: rtodd@globeandmail.com; pierre_nollet@cbc.ca;
> lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca; danny.copp@fredericton.ca; MacPherson,
> Don; leader@greenparty.ca; oldmaison@yahoo.com; dan.bussieres@gnb.ca;
> jacques_poitras@cbc.ca; gypsy-blog@hotmail.com; spinks08@hotmail.com;
> bruce.noble@fredericton.ca; jchretien@heenan.ca;
> bmosher@mosherchedore.ca; ghmcphail@rogers.com;
> tomp.young@atlanticradio.
> Layton.J@parl.gc.ca; Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca
> Subject: Fwd: Say Hey to Schreiber's lawyer Eddy Greenspan and Brian
> Mulroney for me will ya? In return I will talk to the PCO dudes about you.
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
>
> You will find this email and much much more at the link above just
> scrool to the bottom of the comments. However I suspect that you
> already know about it anyway
>
> Correct Stevey Boy Harper?
>
> However the better question should be ? Does the Dark British Lord of
> a Subway Stop who is about to go into a Yankee jail I know for a fact
> his lawyers eddy greenspan and Andy frey know everything they need to
> know to follow their client into jail as well.
>
> Correct Mr. Frey?
> Veritas vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Dec 10, 2007 3:01 AM
> Subject: Say Hey to Schreiber's lawyer Eddy Greenspan and Brian
> Mulroney for me will ya? In return I will talk to the PCO dudes about you.
> To: ethi@parl.gc.ca, asselg@parl.gc.ca, infoam@fredericton.cbc.ca,
> Thibault.R@parl.gc.ca, martin.pat@parl.gc.ca , hubbac@parl.gc.ca,
> SzaboP@parl.gc.ca, DhaliS@parl.gc.ca, LavalC@parl.gc.ca
> Cc: info@pco-bcp.gc.ca, bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com,
> egreenspan@144king.com, WallaM@parl.gc.ca, delmad@parl.gc.ca,
> TilsoD@parl.gc.ca, VankeD@parl.gc.ca, HiebeR@parl.gc.ca,
> PearsG@parl.gc.ca
>
> Just Dave
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 2,973
> Domain Name gc.ca ? (Canada)
> IP Address 198.103.111.# (Privy Council Office)
> ISP GTIS
> Location
> Continent : North America
> Country : Canada (Facts)
> State/Region : Ontario
> City : Ottawa
> Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 6.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Dec 6 2007 4:53:58 pm
> Last Page View Dec 6 2007 4:53:58 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.google.ca...&hl=en&
> Search Engine google.ca
> Search Words brenda martin w5 mexico consular
> Visit Entry Page http://www.davidamos.blogspot.
> Visit Exit Page http://www.davidamos.blogspot.
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time Dec 6 2007 3:53:58 pm
> Visit Number 2,973
>
> From: CE
> To: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com
> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 11:37 AM
> Subject: [Politics from a New Brunswick perspective] New comment on Pick a
> lane.
>
> CE has left a new comment on the post "Pick a lane":
>
> Just so Mr. Amos understands, NBPolitico's blog entries are
> cross-posted to his CanadaEast blog (at his discretion), comments are
> not cross posted. To make a comment on CanadaEast, Mr. Amos simply
> needs to register for a free account.
>
> NBPolitico is not employed by CanadaEast nor is he censored on
> CanadaEast. His opinions are his own and he is free to discuss any
> topic he chooses.
>
> Also, for the benefit of Mr. Amos, Jamie Irving is not associated with
> CanadaEast beyond his role as publisher of the Telegraph Journal. Mr.
> Amos seems to like to blame Jamie for every problem he faces in life.
> I just wanted to clarify, Jamie is not associated with CanadaEast so
> feel free to hold me solely responsible for your woes Mr. Amos.
>
> Sincerely,
> Scott Agnew
> Web Services Manager
> CanadaEast Interactive
>
> Post a comment.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Agnew, Scott
> To: David Amos
> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 9:03 AM
> Subject: RE: Yo Scotty and Chucky I would love to me both of you and
> your Ironhorse of a lawyer too. Bring the material I gave you three years
> ago
>
> Mr. Amos
>
> I received your email below and checked out your blog (I had not heard
> of your blog before now) but I’m afraid I can’t make any sense out of
> what you are saying. I have not seen any CanadaEast articles on your
> site and therefore, would have no reason to launch a DCMA complaint
> with Google.
>
> I also received your rambling voice mail, and again, cannot seem to
> make out what it is you are talking about. Feel free to contact me
> again to explain if you feel the need.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> K. Scott Agnew
> Web Services Manager
> CanadaEast Interactive
> P: (506) 383-2597
> F: (506) 859-4904
> E: scott.agnew@canadaeast.com
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 6:40 AM
> To: Agnew, Scott; oldmaison@yahoo.com; dan.bussieres@gnb.ca;
> jonesr@cbc.ca; atvnews@ctv.ca
> Cc: lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca; Kathy.Alchorn@fredericton.ca;
> Kim.Quartermain@fredericton.ca
> Danny.Copp@fredericton.ca; John.Foran@gnb.ca; premier@gnb.ca;
> davidramos333@yahoo.ca; David Amos
> Subject: Yo Scotty and Chucky I would love to me both of you and your
> Ironhorse of a lawyer too. Bring the material I gave you three years ago
>
> Scotty can bring the biggest legal team he can muster. the more the
> merrier for me N'est Pas?
>
> After he checks my work in my blog he can see that I posted the same
> stuff and in fact this very email within my blog about you EH?.
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
>
> Rest assured that I ain't afraid of all three of you or the Fat Fred
> City Finest either
>
> What say we get Danny watters to witness the little hoe down with the
> Irving idiot?
>
> OHHHH BOY!!!!!! I received two emails from this Scott gur. Here they are -
>
> Nice language Mr. Leblanc. Perhaps I should publish your email on
> CanadaEast as you seem to want to publish every correspondence we send
> you on your blog.
>
> Now if you'll excuse me, I have a lot of important work to do managing
> a network of news and information websites. Have a nice day sir.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> K. Scott Agnew
> Web Services Manager
> CanadaEast Interactive
> P: (506) 383-2597
> F: (506) 859-4904
> E: scott.agnew@canadaeast.com
>
> BTW, Mr. Leblanc, I will be in Fredericton tomorrow, Sept 12, 2007 so
> if you'd care to repeat the content of your earlier email to my face
> please advise of a meeting time and place at your convenience.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> K. Scott Agnew
> Web Services Manager
> CanadaEast Interactive
> P: (506) 383-2597
> F: (506) 859-4904
> E: scott.agnew@canadaeast.com
>
> Wednesday, March 12, 2008
> JAMIE IRVING DID INDEED HAVE THE BLOG SHUT DOWN!!!!
>
> OK...I got a few huge blogs coming so since many people are waiting for my
> Jamie Irving story?
>
> I decided to blog it now.
>
> I received an comment in a forum from Blogger a few days ago and this is
> what they told me -
>
>
> More options Mar 10, 11:50 pm
> From: Blogger Employee
> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
> Local: Mon, Mar 10 2008 11:50 pm
> Subject: Re: After two weeks still nothing from blogger!!!
>
> adhd activist,
>
> Your blog was removed due to a copyright infringement. There is an
> appeal process, however, and you can get some more information by
> checking out the following page regarding the Digital Millenium
> Copyright Act:
>
> Blogger team
>
> Copyright infringement? What are they talking about?
>
> I never received an email from blogger about this issue and the blog was
> gone.
>
> So? I began my investigation!!!!
>
> Now ...On the 20th of February someone < could have been an Irving employee
> > left a story in the blog I wrote about Terry Totten.
>
> Sorry...I don't have it with me because the blog is gone.
>
> I took the comment and blogged the guy's comment.
>
> I received this email soon afterwards -
>
> To: oldmaison@yahoo.com
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 12:03:10 PM
> Subject: cut and paste article from the Telegraph Journal
>
> M. LeBlanc,
>
> The posting attached below found on your website is a copy of the article
> posted on the Telegraph Journal website today (February 21st 2008)
> (http://telegraphjournal.
>
> If you would kindly remove it from your website within the next 24 hours,
> since it is in violation of the Canadian Copyright Law.
>
> Thank you
>
> Sébastien Godin
> Éditeur - Jminforme.ca/Content Manager - Canadeast.com
> www.jminforme.ca
> www.canadaeast.com
> sebastien.godin@jminforme.ca
> sebastien.godin@canadaeast.com
>
> Of course I don't care too much for some Irving employee telling me - 24
> hours of else?
>
> So my Scottish temper clicked in and I wrote back -
>
> wasn't from me...you got the wrong guy!!!!!
>
> I was fuming so minutes later I sent another email-
>
> I don't take too kindly to blackmail!!!!
>
> You better back or Jamie Irving will get a blast in my blog!!!
>
> Sorry...Getting a little upset here....
>
> That was that!!! I never received another email from the Irvings. You can
> tell I was upset because I forgot to add the word - Off!
>
> One week later the blog was gone!!!
>
> I believe that I had a case because I don't copy stories from the Irving's
> papers.
>
> Many bloggers do but I don't bother!!
>
> I got enough stories in my own head.
>
> Some suggested it was the CBC? Nope!!!
>
> I had a conversation with a CBC lawyer months ago and everything was fine.
>
> So therefore, it was indeed Jamie Irving who made a complaint to Blogger
> and
> that's that!!!
>
> I expected an email from Blogger but I never got one.
>
> Now? I can appeal the verdict and I will because I feel bad that I have
> information about people who died. Those memories are gone.
>
> The Irvings have no respect for the dead because they tried to have me
> remove a story from a dead person months ago.
>
> I expected this anyway because the irvings even tried to have my Flickr
> account shut down!!!
>
> The Irvings are pure evil and they will try anything to have control.
>
> My God? They will go as far as killing birds nests to get their woods!
>
> We're dealing with old Germany again!!!
>
> I got a message to Jamie Irving and the rest of the Irving's Family!
>
> You cannot get rid of me! I may start my own web site!
>
> I'll always be around telling La Veriter!!!!
>
> There's only one way to stop moi?
>
> You got to shoot me!!!!
>
> I understand this day is coming soon enough!!!
>
> You cannot have a guy on Social Assistance walking the Capital thinking his
> Sh@t don't stinks!!!
>
> Someone told me a good story about Jamie Irving old girlfriend.
>
> Stay tuned!!!!
>
> P.S. I'm in a hurry so excuse the bad grammar!!!
>
> One More thing? The employee who sent me the email must be a hero in the
> Irving Empire! He must have gotten a huge raise.
>
>
> posted by Charles LeBlanc @ 2:28:00 PM 23 Comments
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> To: <mclaughlin.heather@
> "thepurplevioletpress" <thepurplevioletpress@gmail.
> "acampbell" <acampbell@ctv.ca>; "premier" <premier@gnb.ca>;
> "macpherson.don"
> <macpherson.don@dailygleaner.
> "MacPherson, Don" <DMACPHER@dailygleaner.com>; "Jacques.Poitras"
> <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>;
> "urquhart.mia" <urquhart.mia@
> Cc: "occupyfredericton" <occupyfredericton@gmail.com>; "ecofredericton"
> <ecofredericton@gmail.com>;
> "Arthur Taylor" <brother.chao@gmail.com>; "danfour" <danfour@myginch.com>;
> "We are Fred up" <WEAREFREDUP@gmail.com>;
> "Wayne.Lang" <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "MacKnightb"
> <MacKnightb@fredericton.ca>; "tim4nm" <tim4nm@gmail.com>;
> "maritme_malaise" <maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca>; "thenewbrunswicker"
> <thenewbrunswicker@gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 6:55 AM
> Subject: Re Chucky Leblanc, the Gleaner and the government's BULLSHIT email
> game
>
>
> CHUCKY WON'T answer MY emails for exactly the same reason why he
> PUBLISHES emails and letters from others.
>
> However I got LOTS of THREATS in emails from Chucky's buddies, the
> police and the IRVING's EH Mr MacPherson and Ms McLaughlin?
>
> Mail policy frustrates LeBlanc
> Published Tuesday December 20th, 2011
>
> Privacy| Provincial rules forbid electronic messages to social
> assistance recipients
> A6
> By HEATHER MCLAUGHLIN
> mclaughlin.heather@
>
> In this technological age, the provincial government is sticking to a
> policy that discourages email as a communication tool with clients.
>
> Fredericton blogger Charles LeBlanc, a social assistance recipient who
> lives on the south side of Fredericton, said he can't get his case
> worker to respond to his questions via email.
>
> He said he doesn't have a land-line telephone or a cellphone, but he
> does have a computer.
>
> So when LeBlanc asked his new social worker to respond to him via
> email, she opted instead to write him a letter.
>
> Any time LeBlanc has a question about his file, he can expect to wait
> for his answer until Canada Post delivers him a written missive from
> his case worker.
>
> "There is a policy that discourages case managers from contacting
> clients by email due to the security risk as it relates to privacy and
> confidentiality of client information," said Judy Cole, social
> development spokeswoman.
>
> "The Internet is a public domain. Case managers do receive emails, but
> will call the individual back or respond by letter.
>
> "Clients can also visit their regional office to speak with staff
> directly. A client can let their case manager know how to better meet
> their needs," she said.
>
> The policy is Government of New Brunswick Policy Number AD-7109.
>
> "Information that is considered confidential or sensitive should not
> be transmitted via email without the use of government approved
> security mechanisms," states the province's policy.
>
> "We define client-identifiable information as 'confidential and
> sensitive.' All departments and employees are bound by this GNB
> policy."
>
> To LeBlanc, it's just silly.
>
> "If I call from a pay phone, you can't leave a phone number to call
> back because it's a pay phone. If I have to go to use somebody else's
> phone, then they hear all my personal business," LeBlanc said.
>
> "Since they moved the Social Development office across the river to
> the highest peak of the city, how come I can't communicate through the
> information highway?
>
> "Not everybody on social assistance has a phone. I'm sorry, but that's
> the way it is."
>
> LeBlanc said every time he asks a question, he gets a letter back in the
> mail.
>
> LeBlanc said he never had the same problem with his old case worker.
>
> "Since they moved the building across the river, I absolutely had no
> problem whatsoever. None. I contacted my (old) case worker and she
> would email me back, no problem," he said.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Politics from a New Brunswick perspective
>
> Thursday, November 01, 2007
> Pick a lane
> (crossposted to CanadaEast)
>
> Whenever I am driving in Montreal or Toronto, I often find myself
> yelling "pick a lane" at some of my more aggressive and less logical
> fellow drivers.
>
> My advice to Jeannot Volpé is similar.
> Much as he did this spring during the legislative sitting, rather than
> picking one or two or three major issues and focussing on them and
> making an effective critique of the government, his reaction to the
> recent cabinet shuffle was unfocussed and made him look bitter and
> overly negative when he could have used the opportunity to make some
> political hay.
>
> The cabinet shuffle had a number of areas that could have been seen as
> flaws. No one likes to see more politicians at the top, and the
> cabinet has two extra members. Women are way under represented and
> that didn't improve with this shuffle. Volpé ignored those points.
> Volpé criticized one area that makes sense - a floor crosser being
> included in the cabinet - but then couldn't resist himself and threw
> his credibility out the window in going way off track.
>
> Rather than make an arguments about democracy, he went on a rant about
> how Tories were mad, Liberal backbenchers would revolt and how the
> dirty rat would never be re-elected. How about: "Crossing the floor is
> an affront to democracy and an insult to voters. Shawn Graham should
> never have justified this action by admitting these people into his
> caucus and certainly shouldn't have rewarded it by putting one of them
> into his cabinet"? That is a reasonable criticism that would resonate
> with people, but with Volpé, it has to become petty and personal.
>
> Then he makes up some nonsense about how this cabinet shuffle is an
> insult to Francophone New Brunswickers because Hédard Albert and
> Carmel Robichaud were "demoted". Huh? All cabinet ministers are equal
> at the cabinet table and even if they weren't, the argument doesn't
> make sense.
>
> Albert moves from a department focussed on the machinations of
> government whose primary role is to negotiate labour agreements with
> the civil service under the close watch and direction of the premier
> and finance minister to a ministry which has been touted by the
> premier as a top priority.
>
> Robichaud moves to an admittedly smaller department in terms of budget
> but one which requires close relationships with the province's 103
> municipalities during a period when the province is talking about
> substantial change to municipal governance. These don't sound like
> demotions to me. In Albert's case, it would seem a promotion and in
> Robichaud's case it is, at least, a lateral move if not actually a
> promotion as well.
>
> Why the Tories are waiting until next fall to pick a leader I will
> never figure out. Jeannot Volpé is the best thing that has happened to
> the Liberal Party of New Brunswick in a generation!
>
> Posted by nbpolitico at 4:17 PM
> 34 comments:
> Rob said...
> Agreed 100%, NBP. So many better arguments could have been made about
> this cabinet shuffle. Instead it's all about the Tories. Tories are
> insulted, Tories feel betrayed by Wally Stiles, etc. etc. You can
> scream for him to pick a lane, I'll scream at him to get over himself.
>
> The current Conservative party is rudderless, and requires direction.
> They will not get it from Mr Volpé. Liberals should not be excited
> about disastrous leadership, as effective Opposition will only force
> the Graham government to try harder and achieve more. Letting
> government coast along unopposed is good for nobody.
>
> I guess the Tories are simply to busy screaming about Wally and Joan
> to bother finding a Leader. Fall 2008 is still a year away, and the
> PCs will have gone 2 years without direction.
>
> 4:44 PM
> nbpolitico said...
> Liberals should not be excited about disastrous leadership, as
> effective Opposition will only force the Graham government to try
> harder and achieve more. Letting government coast along unopposed is
> good for nobody.
>
> You're right Rob; as fun as it is for the Liberals in the short term
> to not face opposition, in the long term a strong opposition makes for
> better government.
>
> 5:05 PM
> NB taxpayer said...
> Even though Stiles is a weasel, I don't blame him for jumping ship.
> And for the record, it wasn't that big a jump considering he went to a
> liberal party from a "liberal lite" party.
>
> 10:09 PM
> David Raymond Amos said...
> Wally Stiles a weasel??? Ain't that the pot calling the kettle black?
>
> 10:48 PM
> David Raymond Amos said...
> Before you delete my comment Mr NBPolitico say Hoka Hey to Jamie
> Irving and his yoyo Scotty Baby Agnew for me will ya?
>
> FYI I saved this wepage too.
>
> 10:51 PM
> Andrew said...
> I think we should be talking about more pertinent issues regarding the
> Liberal philosophy.
>
> Let us discuss the audacious Liberal tax grab after the generous GST
> cut? The Liberals jacked our taxes after a grossly inaccurate
> GrantThorton audit. Where does it stop?
>
> Canada is rich, wealthy and growing. Why bother living and working in
> a province that cannot realize our country's boom?
>
> Ontario, here I come.
>
> 11:11 PM
> Rob said...
> "Ontario, here I come."
>
> The boom ain't in Ontario, my son. Keep driving west for a day or too
> past North Bay. Once you get past the Man/Sask border, you're getting
> close to money country.
>
> 11:52 PM
> Anonymous said...
> Are you from the left or from the Liberal Party? They are very
> different, but you never really seem to speak about leftist issues -
> just anti-Conservative and pro-Liberal writings.
>
> 1:01 AM
> nbpolitico said...
> David - why would I delete your post? With the exception of spam and
> double posts, the only post I have ever deleted on this blog in the 15
> months I've been keeping it was a libelous one that accused a
> Conservative candidate of having homosexual affairs.
>
> Andrew - As I mentioned somewhere else, I suspect if this GST/HST swap
> were to go through, it would be on the recommendation of a nationally
> respected economist and would be immediately followed by an equal cut
> in income taxes.
>
> anon - I am sorry you feel that way. I would agree I am not "left", I
> consider myself a centrist in terms of ideology but that is the label
> I was given for the purposes of my posts on CanadaEast due to my
> support of the Liberals. I have long prided myself as being as
> unbiased as possible and if you have read this blog over time, I think
> you would find I have levelled my fair share of criticism at the
> Liberals when it was due. The fact is that even most Tories will agree
> with the criticism I am levelling at the NB PC Party which is in a
> really sad state these days.
>
> 10:36 AM
> David Raymond Amos said...
> The answer to my why is one word Canadaeast. If you wish me to
> elaborate. Why not ask Scott Agnew and his boss and yours Jamie Irving
> first. Bettter yet say to your lawyer Stevey Boy for me will ya? Now
> watch this go poof eh Chucky Leblanc?
>
> 6:01 PM
> Anonymous said...
> Amos is deleted because he's a kook.
>
> 7:32 PM
> David Raymond Amos said...
> Easily said when you have no name EH?
>
> 12:31 AM
> David Raymond Amos said...
> For the record these people and your new boss Jamie Boy Irving and his
> lawyers in particular know for a fact that I am no kook.
>
> As you delete this comment, note the last letter. It came to me from
> the Governor General three years ago just after I ran for a seat in
> the 38th Parliament against the aptly named lawyer Rob Moore who is
> now the Parliamentry secretary for the Minister of Justice. It also
> came just before I was falsely imprisoned in the USA without bail
> under the charges of "other" without even being legally arrested.
>
> While I was in jail the Fredericton Police finally got around to
> investigating my complaint to the Police Commission against them for
> my illegal banishment form the Legislative grounds in New Brunsick for
> the benefit of Bernie Lord and his many cohorts. Sgt Danny Copp closed
> the file very quickly when I came screaming out of that Yankee jail.
> Ask him why and about the conflict of interest.
>
> What the Irving rag commonly known as the Gleaner wrote about me above
> the fold on May 24th for the benefit of the crook, T. J.
> Burke,(Remeber he does have a criminal record) the RCMP and the
> Fredericton cops was pure bullshit and never retracted. Why?
>
> What would your heros such as Stevey Boy Harper and Paul Martin (aka
> Humpty dumpty) have done if such nonsense had happened to them over
> the years? Sue?
>
> FYI I saved this particular webpage to use against Canadaeast in court
> someday. good luck with your conscience and sense of fair play within
> our purportedly profound democracy. Ask the former Attorney General
> Brad green why or the supreme Court of New Brunswick or the Law
> Society or the Lt Gov. chaisson. I have many signed answers from
> crooks in New brunswick as they ignore obvious crimes for their own
> benefit and the detriment of the Public Interest and Trust. Because I
> tell the truth and run for public office four times in three years, I
> am a kook? meanwhile the nasty French man Charles Leblanc collects
> welfare takes prescribed drugs and drinks beer as he runs around town
> bothering folks and slandering everyone and his dog on the Internet
> yet he is everybody's hero and love to be photographed by him since he
> got luck and beat the Crown just as his heros the liberals took
> office? Justice is a matter of political will no more no less. N'est
> Pas?
>
> I will be curious to say the least to see if this post makes it over
> to Irvings domain and if so how long it lasts.
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> Jan 3rd, 2004
>
> Mr. David R. Amos
> 153 Alvin Avenue
> Milton, MA 02186
> U.S.A.
>
> Dear Mr. Amos
> Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to my
> predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding your safety. I
> apologize for the delay in responding.
>
> If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
> suggest that you contact the police of local jurisdiction. In
> addition, any evidence of criminal activity should be brought to their
> attention since the police are in the best position to evaluate the
> information and take action as deemed appropriate.
>
> I trust that this information is satisfactory.
>
> Yours sincerely
> A. Anne McLellan
>
> "Lafleur, Lou" lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca wrote:
>
> From: "Lafleur, Lou" lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca
> To: "'motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com'" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com,
> "Lafleur, Lou" lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca
> Subject: Fredericton Police Force
> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:21:13 -0300
>
> Dear Mr. Amos
>
> My Name is Lou LaFleur and I am a Detective with the Fredericton
> Police Major Crime Unit. I would like to talk to you regarding files
> that I am investigating and that you are alleged to have involvement
> in.
>
> Please call me at your earliest convenience and leave a message and a phone
> number on my secure and confidential line if I am not in my office.
>
> yours truly,
>
> Cpl. Lou LaFleur
> Fredericton Police Force
> 311 Queen St.
> Fredericton, NB
> 506-460-2332
>
> http://actionlyme(DOT)org/FBI_
>
> FEDERAL EXPRESS February 7, 2006
>
> Senator Arlen Specter
> United States Senate
> Committee on the Judiciary
> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
> Washington, DC 20510
>
> Dear Mr. Specter:
>
> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
> raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that
> these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in
> contact with you about this previously.
>
> Very truly yours,
> Barry A. Bachrach
> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>
> Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 19:19:32 -0400 (EDT)
> From: "David Raymond Amos" davidramos333@yahoo.ca
> Subject: I repeat I suggested that all of Yahoo's (a publicly held
> corp) people read the text of the letter to their Yankee lawyer years
> ago real slow (KMM57828385V93436L0KM)
> To: "Yahoo! Mail" mail-advocacy@cc.yahoo-inc.com
> ca-abuse@cc.yahoo-inc.com, abuse@yahoo.com, chobson@yahoo-inc.com,
> coombss@fleishman.com, finnegan@yahoo-inc.com,
> suneel.khanna@publishing.
> blord@mccarthy.ca, whistleblower@ctv.ca,
> tomp.young@atlanticradio.
> Paulette.Delaney-Smith@rcmp-
> Holland.M@parl.gc.ca, John.Ferguson@saintjohn.ca, wrscott@nbpower.com,
> dhay@nbpower.com, arsenault_chris@hotmail.com, bill.corby@gnb.ca,
> samperrier@hotmail.com, lorraineroche@gov.nl.ca,
> alltrue@nl.rogers.com, info@johnmccain.com, Governor.Rell@ct.gov,
> beneva@chrisdodd.com, info@johnedwards.com, info@dennis4president.com,
> kalthoff@barackobama.com, info@mittromney.com
> CC: Steve.Graham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca,
> Clabchuk@greenparty.ca, maychair@dal.ca, kmcgowan@greenparty.ns.ca,
> juan.behrend@europeangreens.
> Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, milliken@petermilliken.org, ciec-ccie@parl.gc.ca,
> Bagnell.L@parl.gc.ca, Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca, pelosi@mail.house.gov,
> ajw@eastlink.ca, alex@gravel2008.us, elliott@gravel2008.us,
> info@gravel2008.us, checkup@cbc.ca, Dewar.P@parl.gc.ca,
> info@hillaryclinton.com, mail@ronpaul2008.com,
> rep.paul@mail.house.gov, oldmaison@yahoo.com, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca,
> abel.leblanc@gnb.ca, deanr0032@hotmail.com,
> warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Aurele.Daigle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com,
> days1@parl.gc.ca, day.s@parl.gc.ca, Dion.S@parl.gc.ca,
> Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca, Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca,
> Casey.B@parl.gc.ca, Comuzzi.J@parl.gc.ca, Arthur.A@parl.gc.ca,
> louiselorefice@ndp.ca, leader@greenparty.ca, defence@sen.parl.gc.ca,
> Ed.MacEachern@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Louis.Lefebvre@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Jim.Payne@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca,
> Kathy.Alchorn@fredericton.ca, Kim.Quartermain@fredericton.ca
> Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.ca
> forest@conservationcouncil.ca, jonesr@cbc.ca,
> Christian.Couturier@nrc-cnrc.
> debbedford@msn.com, moorew@sen.parl.gc.ca, info@barackobama.com,
> rfowlo@comcast.net, jcallahan@bowditch.com, ctidman@Bowditch.com,
> jhanrahan@Bowditch.com, wickedwanda3@adelphia.net,
> lrikleen@Bowditch.com, pshipley@
> press@joebiden.com
>
> What planet do Yahoo people come from anyway. I just called both of
> Clive Hobson's phone numbers (his cell is 416 721 9860) again and
> California as well (but they don't pick up the phone on the week end)
> Do you Yahoo people even remember my phone calls last week? Rest
> assured I will be calling again come Monday morning. This time I will
> be demanding again to speak to your lawyers and you will have a hard
> time giving me a No for an answer. My phone calls last week were
> recorded by Yahoo and witnessed on my end . Hell I even caught your
> people reading my blog Remember? Rest assured this email will be
> posted there as well surf through the comments. I will damned if I
> will tell you where I put this one.
>
> Furthermore the US Mail I sent to your lawyer over two years ago
> deserves and answer in writing. It was was tracked and Yahoo did
> receive it. call me a liar I Double Dog Dare ya. What the hell did
> Mikey think of the Yankee police surveilance wiretap tape I must ask
> again? I am entitled to an answer from the Yahoo lawyer hired to
> protect the interests of a publicly held Corp Correct?
>
> For the record I quite simply don't care if you think the Yankee
> Depupty Dog Robert F. O'Meara or his nasty Canadian buddy, Dean Roger
> Ray or anyone else pretended to be me byway of the Internet. The dude
> Scotty Baby Agnew of the Irving Empire started this particular spit
> and chew with Yahoo byway of his false allegations about me to you and
> the RCMP. Remember?
>
> What the malicious Irving people and everybody else says of me is not
> only false , it is slander. FYI that is a crime in Canada. If you
> support Agnew then you support his false allegations. Correct. Look
> who else these emails are being sent to. Fellow Canadain and American
> politcians, media people and lawyers who know of my affairs quite well
> as well as many cops including the RCMP. If you had bothered to check
> into my other emails found within your accounts and my blogs you will
> see that the FBI is properly informed and in fact they have been
> calling me. Correct? If you don't believe me about the crime of
> slander in Canada, why not ask the Newfy, Danny Williams and the two
> other Newfys Byron Prior and Paul Perrier that I introduced everybody
> to. He is prosecuting them for slander. Correct?
>
> For the record I did not accuse Depupty Dog nor anyone else of forging
> my email address. However his buddy Dean Roger Ray certainly did
> pretend to be me as he threatened others byway of the internet and he
> made no bones about threatening me and sending the proof of his crimes
> to the RCMP amopngst many others.
>
> That said impersonations of me on the Internet I can handle in
> Canadian courts at a time of my choosing. Right now I am far more
> concerned about the wrongs of the Yankee Depeupty Dog and Yahoo
> support of it. His forgery of my wife's signature on a very Fraudulent
> Purchace and Sale Agreement many years ago should put everybody's
> panties in a knot. Then there is the Title V Inspection etc etc. One
> of Brian Mulroney's (one of our more offensive Prime Ministers)
> companies (Cendant Corp) made a buck off the fraudulent sale of our
> Beach House while their former CEO was being prosecuted in CT and
> while I was falsely imprisoned in a Yankee jail in Beantown byway of
> the false allegations of Depupty Dog Robert F. O'Meara's lawyer Angela
> K. Troccoli. Go figure.
>
> If Mikey Callahan as Yahoo's General Counsel had done his job his job
> three years ago after I contacted him right after I came screaming out
> of that Yankee jail Yahoo would not be in such hot water now. I was
> being prosecuted for sending very legit emails to lawyers during the
> process of litigation brought on by them while Yahoo was bragging that
> it had won an important lawsuit in Canada about someelse sending
> emails. Did you bastards forget I was illegally summoned out of canada
> while running for a seat in Parlaiment with and unsigned complaint
> fraudulently created by a clerk magistrate? Why Yahoo threatened to
> kill my email service then was beyond my understanding but you were
> quick to stop your nonsense then and then play dumb for three long
> years of pure hell for my family. I felt compelled to send Yahoo
> evidence of many crimes just before Depupty Dog and his lawyers
> managed to have my wife and kids evicted from our home without
> warrants or due process of law because of unpaid rent owed to no one
> at all. So I did. but i left you alone while i defended my dumb arse
> against the nasty Feds in two countries. In return Yahoo attacks and
> plays dumb on the very same day?
>
> Again read the letter at the bottom of the email that you just bounced
> back once again right after you read some of Depupty Dogs latest bit
> of bragging. May I suggest that a real person licenced to practice law
> call me back ASAP and do not touch me email acoount until this matter
> is resolved in an ethical fashion? Trust that I will sue Yahoo if you
> continue to cover up your support of crimes practiced against my Clan.
>
> As of tonight I will use email accounts outside of Yahoo's domain in
> my pursuit of justice until I hear from your lawyers. If I hear
> nothing from them I will send Yahoo a summons someday. Get it? If not
> scroll down and read the letter once again real slow will ya?
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 15:27:46 -0700 (PDT)
> From: "Yahoo!" no-reply@cc.yahoo-inc.com
> To: davidramos333@yahoo.ca
> Subject: Yahoo! Administrative Notice
>
> Dear Yahoo! account holder:
>
> By creating and using your Yahoo! account, you agree to abide by
> Yahoo!'s Terms of Service (TOS). Pursuant to the TOS, Yahoo! reserves
> the right to terminate your account or otherwise prohibit use of your
> account in the event that, among other things, Yahoo! believes that
> you have violated or acted inconsistently with the letter or spirit of
> the TOS. It has come to our attention that you may have violated the
> TOS.
>
> Please reread the TOS and cease any use of your account that may
> violate the TOS.
>
> If your use of your Yahoo! account is brought to our attention again,
> and we believe that such use violates the TOS, then we may terminate
> your account without further notice. Please do not
> reply to this email.
>
> Any questions concerning Yahoo!'s Services should be submitted through
> the on-line form in the help area http://ca.yahoo.com/howto/ Yahoo!
>
>
> Yahoo! Mail mail-advocacy@cc.yahoo-inc.com wrote:
>
> Hello David ,
>
> Thank you for writing to Yahoo! Mail.
>
> We have investigated your report, and, based on the information you've
> given us, your account does not appear to have been accessed by the
> sender of this email.
>
> The sender seems to have forged your email address in the "reply-to"
> and/or the "from" field of the message they sent out. Please know that
> we are currently aware of this type of spam and are investigating it.
>
> Please let us know if you still need assistance so I may assist you
> further.
>
> Your patience during this process is greatly appreciated.
>
> Thank you again for contacting Yahoo! Mail.
>
> Regards,
>
> Zoey
>
> Yahoo! Customer Care
>
> 39985998
>
> For assistance with all Yahoo! services please visit:
>
> http://help.yahoo.com/
>
> Original Message Follows:
>
>
> Your email to me is indeed a very sneaky thing for Yahoo to do. Why
> did you edit out yourselves and the subject line etc of the email and
> towhom else I sen the email to???
>
> I repeat I am the guy that you are torturing on behalf of the
> Irvings. I did not complain of myself. They did. I am merely defending
> my name and reputation as I prepare to run for poliitcal office once
> again. Get it yet?
>
> May I suggest that you read the letter that i can easily prove I
> sent to your lawyer in California over two years ago? At leas the text
> of the aforesaid lettert is within the email that you just bounced
> back to me. Thus you can never caliam that you don't know nothing now
> EH?
>
> for the record I am not a spammer nor am I a threat to anyone
> whatsoever. I am a man who sues lawyers cops and politcians ets and
> runs for politcal office from time to time. What the people of
> CanadaEast say of me is untrue and indeed very malicious and in fact
> slander. What say you Kalis?
>
> I will cal Toronto once again perhaps somebody should come to
> the phone EH Mr. Hobson?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> For the rocord fo9llowing this is the heading of the email you are
> responding to what you say to me is pure bullshit.
>
> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:27:49 -0400 (EDT)
> From: "David
> Raymond Amos"
> Subject: RE:
> (KMM57605910V36371L0KM) May I suggest that all of Yahoo's (a publicly
> held corp) people read the text of the letter to their Yankee lawyer
> years ago real slow? To: mail-advocacy@cc.yahoo-inc.com
> ca-abuse@cc.yahoo-inc.com, abuse@yahoo.com, chobson@yahoo-inc.com,
> coombss@fleishman.com, finnegan@yahoo-inc.com,
> suneel.khanna@publishing.
> blord@mccarthy.ca, whistleblower@ctv.ca,
> tomp.young@atlanticradio.
> Paulette.Delaney-Smith@rcmp-
> Holland.M@parl.gc.ca, John.Ferguson@saintjohn.ca, wrscott@nbpower.com,
> dhay@nbpower.com, arsenault_chris@hotmail.com, bill.corby@gnb.ca,
> samperrier@hotmail.com, lorraineroche@gov.nl.ca, alltrue@nl.rogers.com,
> lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca, Kathy.Alchorn@fredericton.ca,
> Kim.Quartermain@fredericton.ca
> Danny.Copp@fredericton.ca, forest@conservationcouncil.ca,
> jonesr@cbc.ca, Christian.Couturier@nrc-cnrc.
> marthajette@yahoo.com, debbedford@msn.com, moorew@sen.parl.gc.ca,
> info@barackobama.com, rfowlo@comcast.net, jcallahan@bowditch.com,
> ctidman@Bowditch.com, jhanrahan@Bowditch.com, wickedwanda3@adelphia.net,
> lrikleen@Bowditch.com, pshipley@
> info@johnedwards.com, info@dennis4president.com,
> kalthoff@barackobama.com, info@mittromney.com CC:
> oldmaison@yahoo.com, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca, abel.leblanc@gnb.ca,
> deanr0032@hotmail.com, warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Aurele.Daigle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca,
> bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com, days1@parl.gc.ca, day.s@parl.gc.ca,
> Dion.S@parl.gc.ca, Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca, Layton.J@parl.gc.ca,
> Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca, Casey.B@parl.gc.ca, Comuzzi.J@parl.gc.ca,
> Arthur.A@parl.gc.ca, louiselorefice@ndp.ca, leader@greenparty.ca,
> defence@sen.parl.gc.ca, Ed.MacEachern@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Louis.Lefebvre@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Jim.Payne@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Steve.Graham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca,
> Clabchuk@greenparty.ca, maychair@dal.ca, kmcgowan@greenparty.ns.ca,
> juan.behrend@europeangreens.
> Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, milliken@petermilliken.org, ciec-ccie@parl.gc.ca,
> Bagnell.L@parl.gc.ca, Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca, pelosi@mail.house.gov,
> ajw@eastlink.ca, alex@gravel2008.us, elliott@gravel2008.us,
> info@gravel2008.us, checkup@cbc.ca, Dewar.P@parl.gc.ca,
> info@hillaryclinton.com, mail@ronpaul2008.com, rep.paul@mail.house.gov,
> info@johnmccain.com, Governor.Rell@ct.gov, beneva@chrisdodd.com,
> press@joebiden.com
>
>
> Yahoo! Mail wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for writing to Yahoo! Mail.
>
> It appears you are submitting multiple emails within one report for
> investigation. In order to assist you most effectively, we are
> requesting that you send us an individual report for each instance of
> unsolicited email that you would like investigated.
>
> I await your feedback so I may investigate your issue.
>
> Spammers use their own methods of sending unsolicited email through
> their own computers, programs, Internet sites, forgery, etc. The
> following steps may help you understand what preventative measures can
> be taken to avoid being discovered and added to junk email lists.
>
> * Never respond to unsolicited email/spam. To the individuals who send
> spam, one "hit" among thousands of mailings is enough to justify the
> practice.
>
> * Never respond to the spam email's instructions to reply with the
> word "remove". This is just a ploy to get you to react to the email,
> and alerts the sender that a human is at your email address, which
> greatly increases its value. If you reply, your address may be placed
> on more lists, resulting in more spam. Please know that Yahoo! offers
> several tools to help you keep spam out of your Inbox:
>
> 1. "Spam" and "Not Spam" buttons -- The most effective way to prevent
> spam from entering your Inbox is by using the "Spam" button in your
> Inbox or the "Not Spam" button in your Bulk Mail folder. If a spam
> message is delivered to your Inbox - click "Spam." If a non-spam
> message is delivered to your Bulk Mail folder - click "Not spam."
>
> By sending examples of spam to Yahoo! for review, it will increase the
> effectiveness of Spamguard, Yahoo! Mail's filtering system. Yahoo!
> will
> use the messages you send to constantly improve the Spamguard
> technologyand help ensure that unwanted messages are delivered to your
> Bulk Mail Folder rather than your Inbox.
>
> 2. Filters -- Yahoo! Mail offers you the ability to create filters
> for your account. You create filters to deliver emails to a special
> folder. To learn more, please visit:
>
> http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/
>
> 3. Block an address -- Use this feature to block email addresses you
> do not want to receive email from. Learn more at:
>
> http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/
>
> * Never sign up with sites that promise to remove your name from spam
> lists. Although some of these sites may be legitimate, more often than
> not, they are address collectors. The legitimate sites are ignored (or
> exploited) by the spammers; the address collection sites are owned by
> them. In both cases, your address is recorded and valued more highly
> because you have just identified it as being read by a human.
>
> * Avoid displaying your email address(es) in public places. This makes
> it harder for spammers to run programs or bots to gather email
> addresses.
>
> * If you use a service that uses an online directory of their users,
> you may want to "opt-out" of this directory. Spammers search the
> directory for new listings.
>
> Yahoo! takes your privacy seriously. Yahoo! does not rent, sell or
> share personal information about you with other people or
> nonaffiliated companies, except to provide products or services you
> have requested, when we have your permission, or under other limited
> circumstances. For example, we provide personal information to
> partners who work on behalf
> of or with Yahoo! under confidentiality agreements. We may also
> provide personal information when responding to subpoenas, court
> orders or legal process, or to establish or exercise our legal rights
> or defend against legal claims.
>
> If we believe it is necessary to share information in order to
> investigate, prevent, or take action regarding illegal activities,
> suspected fraud, emergency situations involving potential threats to
> the
> physical safety of any person, violations of Yahoo!'s terms of use, or
> as otherwise required by law, personal information may be shared.
>
> For further information, please review our full Privacy Policy at:
>
> http://privacy.yahoo.com/
>
> Please let us know if you still need assistance so we may assist you
> further.
>
> Thank you again for contacting Yahoo! Mail.
>
> Regards,
>
> Kalis
>
> Yahoo! Customer Care
>
> 39985998
>
> For assistance with all Yahoo! services please visit:
>
> http://help.yahoo.com/
>
> For the record here is the text the letter to Yahoo once again.
>
> August 14th, 2005
>
> William P. Barr, General Counsel
> Verizon Communications Inc.
> 1095 Avenue of the Americas
> New York, NY 10036
>
> John Bishar Jr General Counsel
> KeySpan Corp
> One MetroTech Center
> Brooklyn, NY, 11201
>
> Michael Callahan, General Counsel
> Yahoo! Inc.
> 701 First Avenue
> Sunnyvale, California 94089
>
> Lucian E. Seagraves General Counsel
> EarthLink Inc.
> 1375 Peachtree St.
> Atlanta, GA 30309
>
> Peter Hugh Collins
> Law Office Of Collins & Collins
> 1266 Furnace Brook Parkway
> Quincy MA 02169
>
> Manuel L Casabielle
> 2420 Coral Way
> Coral Gables, FL 33145
>
> Re: Public Corruption, Constable Michael C. Moore and Triple M. Movers
>
> Hey,
>
> Recently my phone line in Milton was cut off again just before I was
> ordered to appear in Dorchester District Court for no discernable or
> ethical reason other than to allow the court to have an opportunity to
> me put back in jail without a trial once more. The interruption of my
> phone service happened once before just as I was emailing my attorney
> Barry Bachrach and he had just warned that the FBI were behaving very
> poorly to some of his other friends at the same time. This occurred
> immediately before I was falsely imprisoned on October 1st of last
> year and my wife couldn’t call anyone for assistance for several days.
> Recently not very long after I talked to Peter Collins in his capacity
> as Norfolk County Commissioner and Manuel Casabielle as the latest
> lawyer for Whitey Bulger’s buddy the retired FBI agent John J.
> Connolly Jr. my phone was cut off again. All my alarms and bells and
> whistles went off. I had accurately predicted the demise of H. Paul
> Rico in the very same Miami Jail to Michael Von Zamft the very same
> Miami-Dade Assistant State Attorney in November of 2003. This FBI
> agent is charged with leaking confidential information that prompted
> the gangsters to kill John B. Callahan a Winchester financier and
> onetime financial adviser to Bulger's gang. I have made certain that
> everybody knows that I am bounty hunting Whitey Bulger and I have no
> doubt the FBI is protecting him from me. The other Callahan I sent
> this letter to should find at least that to be interesting since he
> found nothing else I sent him warranted a response a long time ago.
> Now he and Mr. Seagraves have hard copy of exactly the same material I
> sent the FBI on May 12th 2005. After they read the letter I just sent
> to Chief Justice Connolly, they can ask their buddies in the White
> House what the hell has happened that has me so pissed off right now.
>
> However I will tell all of you that my phone was quickly put back in
> service as soon as I promised to send William P. Barr hard copy of
> this material. After all he the former Attorney General under
> President Bush’s daddy who now works for a phone company. If anyone
> could understand the ramifications of a layman from Canada possessing
> police wiretap tapes it should be Mr. Barr. I have no doubt whatsoever
> his phone company has been assisting the Feds in tapping my own phone
> lines. When the spooks get spooked they cut it. It is just that
> simple. Feel free to call me a liar. Why not hire the former Attorney
> General Ashcroft, the former DHS Inspector General named after
> Superman or his boss Tom Ridge to sue me. They are all loyal
> republican government lawyers who are now out of a job and looking for
> work. Lawyers make me sick every time they make use of the word
> integrity. I want to argue some of the bastards in court very soon.
> Last Friday when my wife watched the KeySpan truck pull up in front of
> our home and then go talk to the crooked constable Michael C. Moore I
> figured that our utility company was in bed with the crooks as well.
> Why else would they go talk to the constable and not my wife who pays
> their bills? Therefore I have sent both companies that we pay our
> after tax dollars to for their services exactly the same material that
> Constable Moore was served on Friday August 12th plus a copy of my
> letter that I just faxed to the Chief Justice of the District Court
> who sent the bad acting Yankee bastards to our home.
>
> I have sent my wife to deliver in had to the lawyer who practices law
> not to far from our home. Peter H. Collins was also elected to make
> certain that things run smoothl;y and ethically within our county. I
> know what I said to him and faxed to him too long ago for him to
> pretend to me that he is an honest man now. However methinks he had
> better get on his phone if his line has not been cut and call all the
> crooked lawyers in Norfolk county right now and figure out how to
> smooth things over ASAP. I am about to put our little town of Milton
> on the map. Many fancy Yankee lawyers are about to show their nasty
> arses all over the world. Peter Collins may find himself quite famous
> in short order. I sent him and Manuel Casabielle exactly the same
> material I sent the old bastard from Dedham. Everybody knows who he
> is. Hell he owns CBS.
>
> The CD which is a copy of police surveillance tape # 139 is served
> upon all of you in confidence as officers of the court in order that
> it may be properly investigated. Should someone call the FBI ASAP to
> ask what the hell is going on in law enforcement? If all else fails
> and the Feds will not fill you dudes in, the lawyers for the internet
> companies can review some of my private emails that their companies
> blocked just before the federal election last year. Those emails
> should have caused them to act ethically a long time ago rather than
> blocking my correspondence to other lawyers or politicians who had
> claimed to have an interest in my concerns and allegations as they
> sought to be elected. Maybe after receiving hard copy of some of the
> documents that they can find within my emails the light will dawn on
> Marblehead and integrity will have a far more important meaning to
> lawyers after this. With luck it may become more than just another
> word.
>
> In closing I must repeat it and spell it in capital letters for you
> INTEGRITY is very important for lawyers, politicians, bankers and
> priests to understand the meaning of. Without it there is no public
> trust of their chosen professions. That is why many jokes such as
> politicians are just lawyers who have gone really bad ring oh so true.
> Get it?
>
> If I were you Mr. Peter H. Collins I would get on the phone right now
> to your very corrupt Yankee friends such as Chief Mearn of the Milton
> Police, the District Attorney Keating and the Register of Deeds little
> Willy O’Donnell. You should all make certain that the crooked little
> Constables with the big guns under Constable Michael C. Moore and
> their many friends from Triple M. movers in Brockton do not make a
> move against me today or ever for that matter. Here is their numbers
> just in case you want to calll themFrom this point on things are only
> going to get worse for you damned Yankees. I am emailing this letter
> and blogging it around the world. I will lay odds lawyers and cops
> hate being made famous in such a fashion. If you don’t like it, sue
> me. I double dog dare ya too. You damned Yankees are gonna get famous
> anyway as soon as the ex FBI agent John J. Connolly Jr. starts
> spilling the Beans about Beantown way down in Dixieland. If the Feds
> put an end to him in the Miami lock up and he joins H. Paul Rico in
> Hell too soon for the FBI’s benefit, I will make certain that
> everybody knows that you knew my of my concerns about his well being
> first and had a copy of police wiretap tape to prove to you all that I
> am no liar. Triple M. Movers may have many more in storage as early as
> today.
>
> There is a very good reason that the Assistant District Attorney
> Alicia McDonnell and Judge Hanlon caused the many original wiretap
> tapes that I gave them to disappear. Perhaps you should call Beth D.
> McLaughlin of the Dept of Public Safety and make certain the wiretap
> tapes in my home are kept very securely if Triple M movers storm into
> my home and remove them. It would be for the benefit John J. Connolly
> Jr. and your own selves as well. I truly think he is the sneaky
> bastard that threw them in the dumpster in Beantown years ago. Instead
> of the Feds keeping the tapes in confidence or using them as evidence
> they try to be rid of them in such an off handed way? They must be
> valuable evidence if only to the people recorded upon them in order to
> seek releif from the wanton invasion of their privacy. Imagine if I
> were to send such a tape of your family to someone else? At least I am
> ethical enough only to send just one tape to cops or officers of the
> court in a sincere effort to see that it is properly investigated.
>
> The Ex FBI dude’s lawyer Manuel Casabielle should ask him to listen to
> the CD real closely, just in case he recognizes anyone. Even if he
> does not it is still very powerful evidence against the Feds. If my
> suspicions are true the shit will hit the fan in Beantown very soon or
> both John J. Connolly Jr. and I will be dead. Do you fancy Yankee
> dudes want our blood to be found on your hands?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David R. Amos
> PO Box 73
> Acworth, NH 03601
>
> September 11th, 2004
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne Clarkson, I
> acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and CD regarding
> corruption, one received from you directly, and the other forwarded to
> us by the Office of the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick.
>
> I regret to inform you that the Governor General cannot intervene in
> matters that are the responsibility of elected officials and courts of
> Justice of Canada. You already contacted the various provincial
> authorities regarding your concerns, and these were the appropriate
> steps to take.
>
> Yours sincerely.
> Renee Blanchet
> Office of the Secretary to the
> Governor General
>
> 1:13 AM
> David Raymond Amos said...
> Nope I just checked Scotty Baby Agnew must strictly moniter every
> coment posted within the Irving Empire's Domain EH?
>
> He certainly brags about you and you senses of ethics though. Lets all
> see if if you hold up to the phrase "full disclosure" Spinksey Baby
> failed this simple ethical stress test bigtime just like you did N'est
> Pas Chucky Leblanc?
>
> Irving says this of you and I quote them from the web address you
> provide as you cross post your words but not mine (Must be careful of
> their copyright claims even within comments or emails until we meet in
> court eh?)
>
> Full disclosure is a very important term to me. I certainly hope you
> believe in it too. But I do remeber you deleting my words in the past
> even though you deny it. Hence I don't trust you not even a little bit
> particularly when you do not have the sand to say your name. A noname
> critic deserves no respect and their words should carry no weight in
> my book anyway.
>
> "NBPolitico From the Left
> Our left-of-centre political blogger tackles New Brunswick issues from
> the left-wing perspective. He is a New Brunswicker passionate about
> his province and his politics and writes about his take on the
> political scene in New Brunswick and Canada. In the interests of full
> disclosure, he has been a member of the New Brunswick Liberal Party
> since 2001 but previously was a member of the Progressive
> Conservatives. Though a Liberal member and usually a Liberal
> supporter, he is not afraid to applaud any party or politician who
> does good and scold those who do bad."
>
> 1:34 AM
> Anonymous said...
> The fact you ask to be deleted and then spam a blog shows you are a
> kook. Why don't you trying being polite and normal and then you might
> get somewhere?
>
> 7:05 AM
> nbpolitico said...
> I wish you wouldn't post ridiculously long off topic posts, but I
> won't deleted them.
>
> Noneone at CanadaEast or Irving has any control over this blog, in
> case you haven't noticed, this is a blog on blogspot.com, owned by
> Google.
>
> 1:44 AM
> Anonymous said...
> wow
>
> 8:17 AM
> Anonymous said...
> I'd delete them. They're a pile of crap and so is the writer.
>
> 6:40 PM
> David Raymond Amos said...
> I am not off topic I ran in the last provincial election Remember when
> you deleted me? Furthermore you called Wally a weasel but failed to
> explain why he and his wife crossed the floor. That is when I made my
> first comment in this particular blog. I figure you allowed it to
> stand is merely because others made comments afterwards, the yoyo
> attacked me and I saved the webpage as I defended myself from the
> slander.
>
> FYI I served Wally evidence of many crimes just like I served your
> local hero T.J Burke three years ago on June 24th, 2004 when I was
> running against Rob Moore for his seat in the 38th Parliament. That
> was also the same day that I met Danny Boy Bussieres and his cohorts
> in the Fat Fred City Finest for the first time. They thought they
> could scare me as they illegally banished me from the Legislature.
> Their wrongful acts only made me angry and I complained of the
> malicious act to the Polce Commission with my wife and a lawyer
> present when the former Chief Carlisle and Speaker Bev harrison would
> do nothing. Everybody and his dog knows that I kept going back to the
> legislature until Bussieres put something in writing years later.
> Remember? If not where do you think I was in January of 2006 when I
> talked to Steve Murphy on live CTV News as I was running against Andy
> Scott for his seat in the 39th Parliament or that day in October of
> 2004 as I argued with Bernie Lord and some of his former Cabinet
> Ministers?
>
> The fact that this is a blog run by google is exactly why I am using
> it to make my point about your new employer the Irvings.
>
> It was Canadaeast that had Google delete my blog about your fellow
> blogger Chucky Leblanc and them. They also had Yahoo kill two of email
> accounts as well based upon Scotty Baby Agnew's false allegations. Ask
> Scotty Baby Agnew why or his boss and yours Jamie Irving why.
>
> Better yet Google three words Just Dave RCMP or take a short cut and
> simple press on my name in this blog. I am just warming up against
> your new bosses the Irvings. However they should never forget that
> they picked this fight for the benefit of of your hero T.J. Burke.
> What they said of me above the fold in the Gleaner on May 24th the day
> after Charles Lelanc and the following dudes broke the icecap on the
> story I will not forget so easily.
>
> http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/
> http://www.nationalnewswatch.
>
> Threat against Burke taken seriously
>
> By STEPHEN LLEWELLYN
> dgleg@nb.aibn.com
> Published Thursday May 24th, 2007
> Appeared on page A1
>
> As for the anoying little bureacrat with no name, he should take his
> own advice N'est Pas? His insults are a little redundant. Nervous
> people often stutter too much for their own good EH?
>
> 7:59 PM
> David Raymond Amos said...
> Here is a little proof that Yahoo and Google got very nervous after
> they had killed my blog and Yahoo email accounts for the benefit of
> the Irvings. their problem that others exist that are not so easily
> dismissed.
>
> It was too funny that the Yahoo lawyers had to use my gmail account to
> contact me because they had killed their own. N'est Pas?
>
>
> On 10/19/07, Yahoo! Customer Care cc-concierge@cc.yahoo-inc.com wrote:
>
> Hello David,
>
> Thank you for contacting Yahoo! Customer Care.
>
> This is Amelia from the Yahoo! Executive Concierge Team. I'm writing
> in regard to the concern you filed with our executive offices.
>
> Please contact us at your earliest convenience. You may reply to this
> email or call us at 888-277-0811.
>
> Please note that we are available 8am to 5 pm Monday thru Friday.
>
> We thank you for your patience in this matter. In an effort to provide
> you with the best, most efficient care possible, the following
> information would be very helpful:
>
> Contact Phone Number#:
>
> Best time and day to call between 8am-5pm Pacific time (-8:00 GMT)
> Monday thru Friday:
>
> Kindest Regards,
>
> Amelia
>
> Yahoo! Customer Care Concierge Team....At your service!
>
> 8:29 PM
> Anonymous said...
> They killed your blog because they had so many complaints from people
> that you were harassing them. Take the hint.
>
> 9:44 PM
> nbpolitico said...
> David, I think you are a little bit confused because some of the
> remarks you are attributing to me, I never made, but other commenters
> on this blog made.
>
> As for your repeated referral of the Irving's as my "employer", they
> are not my employer. I write a blog there because it gives me more
> exposure, they do not pay me nor do they control my comment.
>
> As for my deleting your posts, it is getting pretty close to becoming
> a self-fulfilling prophesy. I have never deleted comments before but
> you are tempting me with your lengthy off topic posts.
>
> This is a post about Jeannot Volpe's reaction to the cabinet shuffle.
> Please restrict your comments to that general frame of discussion.
>
> 11:05 AM
> Anonymous said...
> Yes sir, its the world against David Amos. Must be tough to have the
> Irvings, the Legislature, the RCMP, the City of Fredericton,
> CanadaEast and likely even Colonel Sanders himself out to get you.
>
> Charles Leblanc is often accused of being a kook but compared to David
> Amos, Charles is a Rhodes Scholar and epitome of class.
>
> Delete the off topic rant above NBPolitico. Otherwise, it just gives
> him an audience for his rants and tirades that have nothing to do with
> the subject at hand or even this blog in general.
>
> 11:27 AM
> CE said...
> Just so Mr. Amos understands, NBPolitico's blog entries are
> cross-posted to his CanadaEast blog (at his discretion), comments are
> not cross posted. To make a comment on CanadaEast, Mr. Amos simply
> needs to register for a free account.
>
> NBPolitico is not employed by CanadaEast nor is he censored on
> CanadaEast. His opinions are his own and he is free to discuss any
> topic he chooses.
>
> Also, for the benefit of Mr. Amos, Jamie Irving is not associated with
> CanadaEast beyond his role as publisher of the Telegraph Journal. Mr.
> Amos seems to like to blame Jamie for every problem he faces in life.
> I just wanted to clarify, Jamie is not associated with CanadaEast so
> feel free to hold me solely responsible for your woes Mr. Amos.
>
> Sincerely,
> Scott Agnew
> Web Services Manager
> CanadaEast Interactive
>
> 11:37 AM
> NB taxpayer said...
> For the record David, some of the remarks you are attributing to me
> above, I never made, but other commenters on this thread made. The
> only comment I made [above] has my link nbtaxpayer beside it. Your
> guess is as good as mine to who the rest are?
>
> Like I said before, try to stay on topic and refrain from using foul
> language and threats and you'll have no problem.
>
> 6:06 PM
> David Raymond Amos said...
> Just because you claim it don't make it so Scotty Baby. I am dealing
> with your false allegations right now remember?
>
> For the record Jamie Irving is also an editor for the Kings County
> Record. He bragged of it when he became one of the directors or
> whatever for the Beaverbrook Art gallery. Check your own records
> Scotty Baby.
>
> Also for the recod I called Jamie's office three times, the RCMP
> several times and then your lawyer once BEFORE Google killed my blog
> about you and Chucky Leblanc and Yahoo killed my email accounts based
> on your false allegations against me. As you well know I emailed the
> entire blog about chucky and you to many people before it was
> maliciously deleted by Google.
>
> Also for the record my blog was created before the Google dudes bought
> the company from Blogger or whatever. Check my two profiles for
> yourself.
>
> Also for the record someone with no ID keeps calling me a kook. That
> is an interstesting term. I read every word carefully to recognize
> writng styles and certain tells. That term "Kook" was employed by none
> other than Brent Taylor when he wrote for the Gleaner to describe
> other bloggers other than himself and his friends right after Chucky
> was banished from the LEG. I suspect Brent is the same person using
> the term "Kook" now as well. Furthermore as I have said many times
> before, I believe Brent Taylor is Spinks and he has never denied it.
>
> 6:24 PM
> David Raymond Amos said...
> where is my foul language and who said I made threats?
>
> 6:25 PM
> Spinks said...
> If it will make you happy, David consider it denied. I am not Brent Taylor.
>
> 8:19 PM
> Anonymous said...
> If it was Brent, then sitemeter would show that the person commenting
> under the pseudonym spinks was from Charlottetown. Spinks is clearly
> in Freddy...which is in another province from where Brent lives. Nice
> try though.
>
> 8:20 PM
> David Raymond Amos said...
> I heard that Brent got a job with Greg Thompson at Veteren Affairs
> after he and I both were losers in the last provincial election.
> Thompson does have an office in Fat Fred City. How do we know he does
> not hang his hat there most of the time? the conservatives would be
> better served to have a spindoctor on top of the New Brunswick scene
> rather than PEI. They ain't gone get any seats over there in the next
> election N'est Pas?
>
> Furthermore this is the first time that Spinksy Baby has bothered to
> deny my belief. Why? whether or not i am wrong, what about the posts I
> commented on in 101 people screwing up Canada? Every one was right on
> topic and Chucky Leblanc got the proof that it was done.
>
> 8:54 PM
> David Raymond Amos said...
> BTW where is the link to your sitemeter NBPolitico? I don't see it how
> someone with no name can read it if you are no one and the same?
>
> 8:58 PM
> Spinks said...
> David, you have never left a post on topic on any of my blogs. You
> were warned and continued anyway. NB Politico clearly has more
> patience than I.
>
> 6:46 AM
> Spinks said...
> Oh speaking of off-topic, sorry about that NBPolitico. Feel free to
> delete my posts that are noweher near what you wrote. This thread
> clearly went off the rails.
>
> 6:47 AM
> nbpolitico said...
> I value my anonymity. If you wish to assume I am Jamie Irving, Spinks
> or Shawn Graham, that is your call.
>
> I am a man of my word, and I will not delete the posts you have made
> to date. However, to present threads from decending into irrelevancy
> in the future, off topic posters will get one warning and subsequent
> posts will be deleted. You are like the bad kid in kindergarten,
> David, and have ruined it for everyone else. Please accept this as a
> personal warning to you for future off topic posts; they will be
> deleted.
>
> I would welcome you to continue visiting the site and posting
> comments, so long as they are on topic or in response to other
> comments that have been deemed on topic.
>
> 2:10 PM
> 101 people who are screwing up Canada (and 10 who are not)
>
> Wednesday, November 29, 2006
> 101 people who are screwing up Canada list begins next week
> Sometime before the end of next week (barring the unforeseen) the list
> of 101 people who are screwing up Canada begins.
>
> The list was based on a few things. First off, since I’m writing it I
> had to agree that those on the list deserve to be there. First and
> foremost it’s my list. No two people will agree on those who are
> there. However some people made compelling cases either on the 101
> people blog or through e-mail about why their nominee should be
> listed. Some I never thought of made the cut.
>
> There are politicians from all stripes, activists, entertainers and
> probably some people you’ve never heard of, but you will. I welcome
> your two cents as we count them down and feel free to chime in at your
> leisure.
>
> Posted by Spinks at 3:28 PM
>
>
>
> 2 comments:
> David R. Amos said...
> Remember me Spinks am i screwing up your notion of Canada?
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> By David Raymond Amos on 12.03.06 12:07 pm
>
> Do you agree with what some of your fan club way out west says of me
> just before I sue the Crown?
>
> http://bpofc.com/?p=109
>
> http://bpofc.com/
>
> http://intothecavern.blogspot.
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> By David Raymond Amos on 12.03.06 12:16 pm
>
> You are too funny Garth Baby
>
> —– Original Message —–
> From: David Raymond Amos
> To: kmdickson@comcast.net ; oldmaison@yahoo.com ;
> Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-
> Tkelly@usss.treas.gov ; mmagalski@usss.treas.gov ;
> rpetrosky@usss.treas.gov ; Bob.morehouse@doj.ca.gov ;
> Sheila.hatch@metrokc.gov ; jphillips@nw.hidta.org ; talvarez@ifb.org ;
> seheigle@uspis.gov ; lisa.palmieri@pol.state.ma.us ;
> sdorn@troopers.state.ny.us ; eunicemorant@yahoo.com ;
> mcclos1@isp.state.il.us ; hayley.giles@peel.police.on.ca ;
> Richard.jackson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; heidie.firth@ccra-adrc.gc.ca ;
> bgray@riversidesheriff.org ; thaven@wsin.riss.net ;
> bill.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; jill.ebner@city.vancouver.bc.
> jenny.johnstone@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; john.foran@gnb.ca ;
> giuliano.zaccardelli@rcmp-grc.
> managing-editor@nytimes.com ; news-tips@nytimes.com ;
> bizday@nytimes.com ; foreign@nytimes.com ; national@nytimes.com
> Cc: wayne.hanniman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; jjdiv.mcu@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ;
> rcmp.ccb.hdiv@ns.sympatico.ca ; Gregory.Lydon@usss.dhs.gov ;
> hightechcrime@usss.treas.gov ; mprewett@leo.gov ; art.fierro@dhs.gov ;
> craig.Caldwell@usss.dhs.gov ; tnowak@usss.treas.gov ;
> spickett@usss.treas.gov
> Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2006 9:51 PM
> Subject: Do ya think the New York Times will pay attention to bloggers
> now Chucky?
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2006/
>
> I doubt it too. So I will blog a news story about them and you and the
> CBC. That should do the trick N’est Pas? In fact most of it is the
> text of this email that will be found you know where. Why should I
> change my stle now EH? Here is where it is just in case the New York
> Times wants to hire some ethical journalists who know how to read.
> before Charles Leblanc erases his work just like this Yankee did.
> http://www.freespeech.com/
> so I inserted something in his other blog
> http://starkravingviking.
>
> Some of my work is here surf around this blog and try to fathom what I am up
> to.
> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
>
> Me and Chucky are here and i am fairly clear.
> http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/
>
> And here is something rather hard to find that I posted three years to
> the very day after the Department of Homeland security came to my door
> in the middle of the night and attempted to take me to Cuba just
> because I tried hard to blow the whistle on Georgey Boy Bush’s malice
> BEFORE that nonsense in Iraq began. Lets all see if this Blog remains
> on the web throughout Xmass
>
> http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/
>
> Say hey to all your liberal pals and your newfound cop buddies in
> Fredericton as well for me will ya Frenchie?
> Merry Xmass? Bah Humbug. The payback for all your insults is gonna be
> a bitch next year or my name ain’t Dave. You lived by the blog thus
> you die by it too in my blog anyway.
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> P.S.. I almost forgot to mention (not really) the best part of my fun
> and frolic under the full moon tonight. Read on Chucky about Garth
> Turner and I. Do ya think a bunch of bureaucrats and politicians in
> two countries are gonna have a Stormy Monday morning? Methinks Dion
> will be sorry he ever went for the liberal leader job. Perhaps you
> should cash in your welfare check and book a one way flight to Cuba so
> the New York Times can’t corner you with some interesting questions
> about your own severe lack of ethics EH? In the “mean” time why not
> have one of your five brains think up a way to convince your lawyer
> buddy Doherty to argue me court for you for free..Give him the pile of
> documents and the CD of the Yankee police surveilance wiretap tape #
> 139 that your dumb as a post pal Vaughn will never hope to understand
> in a million full moons. There have been two full moons in June since
> you promised to give my material to Brad Green for me in exchange for
> the computer I gave you in front of the legislative building that we
> are both banished from now. My friend watched your friend, the bigot
> lug it home for you remember? In return you labelled us Hells Angels
> in the Indy Media then later falsely claimed that I tried to speak
> from the legislative gallery for the benefit of your buddy the
> Sergeant and Arms Danny Boy Brussierres.. Even though you knew we were
> just pigheaded Maritimers like you, you had great fun at our expense.
> Remember what I said about payback? A good start for you would be to
> kiss my English speaking arse as I fart God save the Queen in the best
> tune I can in Tanker Malley and Bev Harrison’s general direction to
> the chagrin of many a Yankee Special Agent.within the US treasury
> Dept. Press print on the attachment and ask if Garth will explain the
> document within his famous Blog. Harper and your god both know that he
> can’t keep secrets.
>
> http://www.garth.ca/weblog/
>
> There appears to be a little delete game between the Upper Canadian
> Conservative crook, Garth Turner and I within his Blog. It is just
> like there once was between the Maritime liberal kissarse, Charles
> Leblanc and I until he stopped allowing me to post anything in his
> blogs whatsoever. The only words of mine that still stand in Chucky’s
> are what was said and done on April Fools Day this year. Chucky only
> acted with some semblance of supposed journalistic integrity merely
> because I saved all the words on April 1st within my own blog and then
> busted him in front of his blogger friends. What was once deleted
> suddenly reappeared. Let see how long they remain thi time around. EH?
> Gotcha Gartha.
> The count stands at 119 now and I saved it as well.
> I have you over the pork barrel now within your own Blog. Why not try
> a little honesty for a change?
> Rest assured it is good for the soul. Furthermore my little Clan could
> use a little good news these days with the Yankees trying hard to put
> their Proud Papa back in jail.
> The Bush cohorts in the GOP lost their big election in
> Yankeedoodleland and your old pal Shrub will no doubt suffer the same
> great fall that Humpty dumpty did this year in the New Year. What harm
> would there be to blow the whistle on them all now? Just say my name
> in Parliament and I will handle the argument in court.
> Is that too much to ask?
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> By David Raymond Amos on 12.03.06 7:20 pm
>
> Oh my look I gave it to Dion and his unholy crowd of cohorts first.
> what was I thinking? Methinks it goes under the heading of Raising
> Hell. N’est Pas?
>
> —– Original Message —–
> From: David Raymond Amos
> To: chimeracavern@yahoo.com ; harper.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ;
> Dion.S@parl.gc.ca ; Martin.Paul@parl.gc.ca ; Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca ;
> Volpe.J@parl.gc.ca ; Brison.S@parl.gc.ca ; Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca ;
> McCallum.J@parl.gc.ca ; cotler.i@parl.gc.ca ;
> roderick.macdonald@mcgill.ca ; kuttner@unb.ca ; dgreen@judicom.gc.ca ;
> Turner.G@parl.gc.ca ; Chong.M@parl.gc.ca ; oldmaison@yahoo.com ;
> robertede@gmail.com ; jchretien@heenan.ca ; dscott@blgcanada.com ;
> Press@devalpatrick.com ; Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-
> paul.dube@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; giuliano.zaccardelli@rcmp-grc.
> dinoratt@telus.net
> Cc: terry.matchett@gov.ab.ca ; bruce.cohen@courts.gov.bc.ca ;
> barb.hookenson@gov.ab.ca ; anne.mactavish@cas-satj.gc.ca ;
> talexander@provincialcourt.bc.
> wdcheverie@gov.pe.ca ; jppeacock@plhlaw.ca ; gepstein@judicom.gc.ca ;
> rjuriansz@judicom.gc.ca ; sarra@law.ubc.ca ; jstoddart@privcom.gc.ca ;
> cthompson@judicom.gc.ca ; bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com ;
> cumby.meghan@dailygleaner.com ; duffy@ctv.ca ;
> tomp.young@atlanticradio.
> Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2006 7:54 PM
> Subject: So much for Garth Turner’s integrity EH?
>
> Garth Baby claims that he does not edit his Blog. Methinks I just
> proven him to be a liar N’est Pas?
> Would you seriously take his advice about matters of money know?
> Credibilty is everything in the money business. Lie about a little and
> you will lie anout alot.
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> Perhaps his Canadian Banker buddies should review what CBC has
> reported and then find all the emails they have received from me over
> the years. Read it and weep Garth Baby and never forget the attached
> tiff file that your dumb assistant called me about after Harper had
> you canned for yapping too much. Press print and have a wise and
> ethical lawyer call me will ya?
> .
> http://www.cbc.ca/technology/
>
> http://www.garth.ca/weblog/
>
> So much for your integrity EH Garth?
> For the record this is the text of just one of the letters I sent you
> in a Tiff file form. Clearly the Governor General thought i was doing
> the right thing on Septemner 11th 2004 after running for a seat in the
> 38th Parliament and just before being falsely imprisoned in the USA.
> What would your former political boss. Mr. Harper do if such things
> had happened to him? Sue? Am I any less of a man than he?
>
> September 11th, 2004
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne Clarkson, I
> acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and CD regarding
> corruption, one received from you directly, and the other forwarded to
> us by the Office of the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick.
> I regret to inform you that the Governor General cannot intervene in
> matters that are the responsibility of elected officials and courts of
> Justice of Canada. You already contacted the various provincial
> authorities regarding your concerns, and these were the appropriate
> steps to take.
>
> Yours sincerely.
> Renee Blanchet
> Office of the Secretary
> to the Governor General
>
> Bow that you sing the praises of Independent political Canadians why
> do you continue to ignore my concerns and allegations of financial
> crimes etc?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> P.S. I have saved this Blog to use as evidence against the Crown in
> Court Perhaps you should call me back. Bow that a writ on the next
> federal election will no doubt be dropped very soon, there is no time
> for Ethical Independents to waste. EH? Here my number again 506 434
> 1379
>
> By David Raymond Amos on 12.03.06 12:32 pm
>
> By David Raymond Amos on 12.03.06 6:40 pm
>
> —– Original Message —–
> From: David Raymond Amos
> To: chimeracavern@yahoo.com ; harper.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ;
> Dion.S@parl.gc.ca ; Martin.Paul@parl.gc.ca ; Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca ;
> Volpe.J@parl.gc.ca ; Brison.S@parl.gc.ca ; Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca ;
> McCallum.J@parl.gc.ca ; cotler.i@parl.gc.ca ;
> roderick.macdonald@mcgill.ca ; kuttner@unb.ca ; dgreen@judicom.gc.ca ;
> Turner.G@parl.gc.ca ; Chong.M@parl.gc.ca ; oldmaison@yahoo.com ;
> robertede@gmail.com ; jchretien@heenan.ca ; dscott@blgcanada.com ;
> Press@devalpatrick.com ; Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-
> paul.dube@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; giuliano.zaccardelli@rcmp-grc.
> dinoratt@telus.net
> Cc: terry.matchett@gov.ab.ca ; bruce.cohen@courts.gov.bc.ca ;
> barb.hookenson@gov.ab.ca ; anne.mactavish@cas-satj.gc.ca ;
> talexander@provincialcourt.bc.
> wdcheverie@gov.pe.ca ; jppeacock@plhlaw.ca ; gepstein@judicom.gc.ca ;
> rjuriansz@judicom.gc.ca ; sarra@law.ubc.ca ; jstoddart@privcom.gc.ca ;
> cthompson@judicom.gc.ca ; bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com ;
> cumby.meghan@dailygleaner.com ; duffy@ctv.ca ;
> tomp.young@atlanticradio.
> Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2006 2:00 PM
> Subject: You can never say ya didn’t know now EH Garth Turner?.
>
> http://www.garth.ca/weblog/
> Of leaders and voters
>
> posted by Garth Turner on 11.13.06 @ 2:54 pm |
>
> Canadian Politics
>
> Must be a slow media week in Ottawa, judging from the storm of
> interest that’s blown up. The rumours are flying that at my press
> event tomorrow I’ll be announcing my decision to quit being an Indie
> and start being a Green.
>
> Predictably, that has many visitors to this blog cheering, and many
> others out for my hide. But everybody should just chill. As I wrote
> some hours ago, the big issue right now is not me, but rather some
> disturbing insights into how the “new” government is actually working.
> I think we should talk about it. This matters a lot more than the fate
> of one homeless MP.
>
> In fact this out-of-control speculation is exactly why I thought it
> would be a good thing to have more clarity. So, I won’t be telling you
> I am joining the Green Party as deputy leader, as is being reported. I
> will, however, have comments on that party and its leader. I’ll also
> make it clearer what my intentions are in the next few months.
>
> Mostly, tomorrow is about Canadian voters, about what our political
> leaders promise and deliver, and what I’ve just learned.
>
> posted by Garth Turner on 11.13.06 @ 2:54 pm |
>
> 118 Comments so far
> Leave a comment
>
> Remember me Garth?
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> By David Raymond Amos on 12.03.06 12:07 pm
>
> Do you agree with what some of your fan club way out west says of me
> just before I sue the Crown?
>
> http://bpofc.com/?p=109
>
> http://bpofc.com/
>
> http://intothecavern.blogspot.
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> By David Raymond Amos on 12.03.06 12:16 pm
>
> For the record this is the text of just one of the letters I sent you
> in a Tiff file form. Clearly the Governor General thought i was doing
> the right thing on Septemner 11th 2004 after running for a seat in the
> 38th Parliament and just before being falsely imprisoned in the USA.
> What would your former political boss. Mr. Harper do if such things
> had happened to him? Sue? Am I any less of a man than he?
>
> September 11th, 2004
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne Clarkson, I
> acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and CD regarding
> corruption, one received from you directly, and the other forwarded to
> us by the Office of the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick.
> I regret to inform you that the Governor General cannot intervene in
> matters that are the responsibility of elected officials and courts of
> Justice of Canada. You already contacted the various provincial
> authorities regarding your concerns, and these were the appropriate
> steps to take.
>
> Yours sincerely.
> Renee Blanchet
> Office of the Secretary
> to the Governor General
>
> Bow that you sing the praises of Independent political Canadians why
> do you continue to ignore my concerns and allegations of financial
> crimes etc?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> P.S. I have saved this Blog to use as evidence against the Crown in
> Court Perhaps you should call me back. Bow that a writ on the next
> federal election will no doubt be dropped very soon, there is no time
> for Ethical Independents to waste. EH? Here my number again 506 434
> 1379
>
> By David Raymond Amos on 12.03.06 12:32 pm
>
> By David Raymond Amos on 12.03.06 9:45 pm
>
> 2:18 AM
> Spinks said...
> I have fans?
>
> Seriously though David, you're welcome to post but try to stay on
> topic and can you provide a link with something this long in the
> future? I'll leave it this time but I'll have to put a limit in the
> future. Thanks.
>
> 10:23 AM
> the system
>
> Friday, January 11, 2008
> David Raymond Amos
>
> Richard I tried to blog this email in your blog with amessage in
> support of you but I was blocked
> From: David Raymond Amos (davidramos@xplornet.com)
>
> Sent: February 13, 2007 6:39:24 AM
> Reply-to: David Raymond Amos (davidramos@xplornet.com)
> To: injusticecoalition@hotmail.com
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Raymond Amos
> To: Jeannot.VOLPE@gnb.ca ; chad.peters@gnb.ca ; pcmemb@gnb.ca ;
> David.ALWARD@gnb.ca ; Keith.ASHFIELD@gnb.ca ;
> Margaret-Ann.BLANEY@gnb.ca ; Madeleine.DUBE@gnb.ca ;
> bruce.fitch@gnb.ca ; dale.graham@gnb.ca ; bev.harrison@gnb.ca ;
> Trevor.HOLDER@gnb.ca ; tony.huntjens@gnb.ca ; claude.landry@gnb.ca ;
> Cy.LEBLANC@gnb.ca ; monctonwest@hotmail.com ; kirk.macdonald@gnb.ca ;
> Percy.Mockler@gnb.ca ; bruce.northrup@gnb.ca ; wally.stiles@gnb.ca ;
> mike.olscamp@gnb.ca ; rosemay.poirier@gnb.ca ; paul.robichaud@gnb.ca ;
> Wayne.STEEVES@gnb.ca ; carl.urquhart@gnb.ca ; claude.williams@gnb.ca ;
> brad.green@gnb.ca ; rodney.weston@gnb.ca ; l.catalli.sonier@gnb.ca ;
> dan.bussieres@gnb.ca ; Hermenegilde.Chiasson@gnb.ca ; charles leblanc
> ; Bernard.Richard@gnb.ca ; Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ;
> Akoschany@ctv.ca ; jtravers@thestar.ca ; warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> ; btaylor@nbnet.nb.ca ; trenchcoatblog@yahoo.ca ;
> Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-
> madd_professor@cox.net ; dean Ray
> Cc: premier@gnb.ca ; Chris.Baker@gnb.ca ; b.roy@gnb.ca ;
> nouvelle@acadienouvelle.com ; newsroom@nbpub.com ; carl.davies@gnb.ca
> ; advocacycollective@yahoo.com ; cumby.meghan@dailygleaner.com ;
> mleger@stu.ca ; jwalker@stu.ca ; plee@stu.ca ; dwatch@web.net ;
> Duane.Rousselle@unb.ca ; oldmaison.wcie@gmail.com ;
> seanoshaughnessy@rogers.com ; jonesr@cbc.ca ;
> collins.moncton-east@hotmail.
> kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca ; greg.byrne@gnb.ca ; Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca ;
> mary.schryer@gnb.ca ; rick.miles@gnb.ca ; Bernard.LeBlanc@gnb.ca ;
> Cheryl.Lavoie@gnb.ca ; claude.landry@gnb.ca ; Jack.Keir2@gnb.ca ;
> abel.leblanc@gnb.ca ; eugene.mcginley2@gnb.ca ; John.Foran@gnb.ca ;
> saintjohnfundy@hotmail.com ; roly.macintyre@gnb.ca ; Ed.Doherty@gnb.ca
> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 3:38 PM
> Subject: So Volpe has Shawny Baby got a good grip on all the liberals
> today?
>
>
> Hey Frenchy
> Now that the crooked old lawyer from Chipman got the job he wanted so
> that he can add to his pension income and Hermie Baby is about to make
> another fancy speech so that he can run a tight ship. It is very
> important to my clan that all Hell breaks out in the old Maison. EH?
> The Independent Barbarian lingering at the gate who banished from the
> Old Maison in NB in June of 2004 when he was running for a seat in
> upper Canada laughed as he heard on the news that the Upper Canada
> crook, Garth Turner is turning coat to a garish shade of red. Turner
> sang the praises of his imposed Indendence just long enough to make a
> deal with the other side of the malevont Upper Canadain House and
> hopefully get himself reelected once more in very pregnant federal
> election. However a true a very pigheaded Independent is still betting
> that there ain't no honour amongst thieves. Methinks once I piss off
> enough kids who are protesting for the Fake Left crooks who
> manipulating them for their own ends, the worm will turn on you all.
> Once some of the more ethical of the college kids chuck the siver
> spoon from their mouth and start asking the right questions to their
> very corrupt representives in Fredericton and on the Hill in Upper
> Canada, I have no doubt whatsoever that more crooks will try to
> protect their nasty arses from litigation and prosecution just like
> the nervous little liberal lawyer, Mikey Murphy just did. Me thinks
> the wicked game that has always been may be over and the crooked
> houses will fall like a house of cards. Here is hoping for the benefit
> of us all it happens BEFORE a War on Iran breaks out. If it does
> global warming in a bigtime fashion could happen over night. N'est
> Pas?
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> Posted by Richard A. Harris at 8:24 AM
> Labels: spinks .greg.byrn n gnb ca
>
> About Me
> Rick Harris
> born July 1/1952. Grand mother raise me from 2 until 14, move back to
> grand mother at 17, quite school and went to work, got a Apartment for
> Brother and Mother at 19, got building lot from Grand mother and build
> first home at 21, Brother move in to his own home 1n 1983, Mother live
> with us ,my wife Marilyn ,2 children until she pass away January
> 5,1996, had my first Grand child December 1996, by January of 1997 the
> war started with the Government ? buy December of 1999 1 have loss my
> life, Gave my old house up, loss my wife, sold of the equipment that i
> wanted to take out west in 1999 because no place to store it, over
> $400,ooo thousand dollars have went through my hands now in 2007. i
> will be broak soon
>
> Half an Hour
> A place to write, half an hour, every day, just for me.
>
> Saturday, August 26, 2006
> The Incompetence of the Lord Government
> Responding to Jacques Poitras:
>
> If the Conservative policies have favoured universal programs
> recently, that's only an accident. Certainly, it would be odd to paint
> them with the 'universalist' lable. And in this case, it would
> probably be incorrect. Better to paint them with a lable that is
> probably more accurate (at least in intent): populist.
>
> What Bernard Lord is trying to do is to read the mood of New Brunswick
> voters and then to deliver what they want. Or, more accurately, to
> look like he's delivering what they want, so long as it doesn't offend
> his well heeled patrons.
>
> Auto insurance, for example, was the big issue in the last election.
> Insurance companies were gouging the public. Lord promised to regulate
> the companies. After being elected, he first ignored that promise, and
> then when the noise became loud enough, he brought in a watered-down
> version. This, in combination with voluntary premiums reductions, was
> enough to abate the criticism (New Brunswickers, it appears, are not
> able en masse to look at insurance rates in, say, Manitoba).
>
> This year, oil companies (and especially Irving) are gouging New
> Brunswick drivers. Despite paying the same world price as other
> jurisdictions, and despite similar taxation rates, New Brunswick oil
> companies have charged much more than their counterparts in Ontario
> (and consistently more than their counterparts in regulated PEI). Lord
> brought in regulation, but in such a way that his patrons would not be
> impacted. Hence, while small wholesalers are squeezed out, Irving
> chugs along, untouched.
>
> If we look at what Lord promises and what he does, it's a similar
> pattern. He wants to appear to be a populist. For example, after
> hearing requests for years, he has finally promised $250 million to
> refurbish schools. Critics will point out (correctly) that he has
> ignored this infrastructure for seven years. The $250 million will
> disappear after the election, just as his promised health care
> expenses disappeared after the last election. Why? His patrons
> disapprove of expenditures on health and education - they would much
> rather see these systems privatized. Well, Lord can't do that - but he
> can run them into the ground in the interim, in the hopes that enough
> New Brunswickers will plead for private services, anything, to replace
> the mess they must endure.
>
> The real issue in this election - or, what would be the real issue,
> were the media not almost completely controlled by Lord's patrons - is
> the general incompetence of the Lord administration, its inability to
> do anything in the way of proactive governance of the province. This
> is why Lord attacks Graham on his qualifications. because, were the
> spotlight pointed the other way, Lord would be seen as incompetent.
>
> Both the insurance and the gas price regulations were fiascos, for
> example. Not simply did they favour Lord's patrons, they were launched
> in a confused and unclear fashion, with changes and announcements
> being made at the last minute.
>
> Even the current election was launched in this ad hoc style, with Lord
> being unable to pick a day and organize an election-launch rally on
> time.
>
> Lord's planning process produced a document, the 'five in five' plan,
> giving his government the distinction of taking seven years to produce
> a five year plan.
>
> The orimulsion fiasco has received only limited coverage in the press.
> For those who have forgotten, Lord's government committed $800 million
> to build an orimulsion plant without first having signed a contract
> for delivery with the only orimulsion producers in the world, the
> Venezuelans.
>
> The Conservatives do not, in fact, have a long term plan for energy
> sustainability. So far as any observer can judge, the plan is to
> essentially have Irving import oil and gas from the world market.
>
> Lord did attempt to obtain funding for a nuclear plant. However, he
> was unable to reach a deal with the federal government, and then
> blamed the federal government for the failure, despite the fact that
> no similar deal exists with any other province.
>
> Lord, meanwhile, was a strong supporter of Harper's pre-election plan
> to address 'fiscal imbalance'. He should have checked the plan,
> however, since he apparently failed to realize that the plan would
> mean less money for New Breunswick, not more. It turns out that
> Ontario and New Brunswick have very different views on what
> constitutes fiscal imbalance.
>
> Lord claims to have accomplished a lot. He boasted in a recent speech,
> for example, to have spent more money on roads than ever before. New
> Brunswickers would be wondering where this money went - he appears to
> have paved only a few kilometers of highway. Fredericton residents are
> familiar with the never-ending construction of the link to highway
> two. Moncton residents are still waiting for their new bridge to be
> connected to a major road. Dieppe residents are still waiting for a
> bridge. In seven years, Lord has not managed to connect the highway
> system with either Maine or Quebec.
>
> Residents of New Brunswick are also wondering about Lord's health care
> management plan. Not simply the $25 million announced this month for a
> health care records system, again missing for the preceeding seven
> years. But also the closure of hospitals and the plan to develop
> 'regional specializations', busing patients from (say) Moncton to
> Saint John (or to Halifax) for treatment.
>
> Lord doesn't understand privacy and accountability. He has had two
> ministers resign because of breaches of privacy. OK, this happens. But
> then he swiftly hires them back. It's this sort of recycling of people
> who are demonstrated to be incompetent that leaves a sour taste in
> people's mouths.
>
> Let's also not forget that Bernard Lord's salary is topped up by
> $70,000 every year by the Conservative Party. For any other public
> official this would be a gross conflict of interest. For Lord, it's
> business as usual.
>
> Speaking of resignations, how about Tanker Malley. Here is an MP who
> resigned because the Lord government was wrecking his riding's health
> care system and generally ignoring its development and tourism needs.
> Lord's first reaction was to fabricate a threat made by Malley in an
> attempt to promote a judge. What? Nobody believed this, of course, and
> Malley (another retread Tory) is now in good standing in the house.
>
> Speaking of economic development and tourism, Lord has done nothing.
> There have been several cases where development has gone elsewhere -
> such as the hundreds of jobs Research in Motion decided to send to
> Nova Scotia - where the NB government was not in the game. Lord's
> government appears to respond when companies come calling, but do not
> proactively seek out the valuable and worthwhile development.
>
> Another example of the populist do-nothing approach is the Petitcodiac
> River. Lord is quite comfortable making promises to let the river flow
> again, but his well-heeled supporters by 'Lake Petitcodiac' have
> managed to stall the breaching of the causeway for Lord's entire term
> of office. Lord's latest is that it's a federal responsibility.
>
> This is a very common characteristic of the Lord government. It is
> passive. The feds have to come to him. It's not up to the government
> to initiate funding programs, or tourist programs, or development
> programs. Which means that the worthwhile programs - the ones that
> take some effort - escape, while the New Brunswick government ends up
> funding things that would be done anyways.
>
> I could continue with this comment - there's no shoratge of examples,
> but you get the point. There is no need to fish for an issue in this
> election. The issue should, very clearly, be a question of competence.
> But no media outlet in this province is going to touch this. Because,
> on this issue, Lord is swept out of office.
>
> Posted by Downes at 7:39 AM
>
>
>
> 3 comments:
> David R. Amos said...
> Amend but perhaps you should cll me anyway 506 434 1379. I have lots
> you may wish to research
>
> 1:32 PM
> Downes said...
> I'm in Australia now, so I won't be calling anyone (and will be lucky
> to get election results).
>
> 2:10 AM
> David R. Amos said...
> Better check your email at work then.
>
> http://iit-iti.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/
>
> My first question should be are you down under on the taxpayers dime
> or on vacation and having too much fun to argue with a politcal animal
> in your own blog? I suspect that you will be checking to see how few
> votes i got in Saint John Harbour as soon as the polls report in.
>
> Perhaps you should call Mr. Belanger of the Office of Integrity for
> public service once you see my emails in your inbox at work. EH? As I
> said press print on the second email to see why.
>
> Whereas you are a public servant, here is something for you to review
> about your ultimate boss John Baird at the Treasury Board
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
>
> It seems that you also brag of your prowess at blogging etc. Me too.
> Methinks you may learn something from me about the fine art of
> blogging in unusual fashion. I truly think you will be far more fun to
> deal with than Charles Leblanc and his pals. Just in case you decide
> to delete this webpage about your opinion of Bernie Lord, know that I
> have saved it already. Are we having fun yet? Later Stevey Boy.
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> 3:29 PM
>
>
> Pat Political
> Plenty of bad things these days. I saw the start of a lot of them.
> Here's what I know. We'll talk about what we can do.
> November 07, 2005
> Bloggers' meeting
> What a wonderful time we had! Cathy Resmer of 802 Online organized
> it, and there were more than twenty of us there. The internet is a
> very important part of my life these days, and I delight in the many
> bloggers I have got to know in this way. That said, there is still
> nothing like the gathering together of live bodies and the sound of
> people talking....
>
> I see that many who were there went home and blogged right after the
> meeting. Others added their comments on Sunday. But this old granny
> blogger had to rest up all day Sunday from all the excitement and am
> just getting caught up today!
>
> Thanks again, Cathy, and to everyone who was there. I loved every
> minute...!
>
> November 07, 2005 in Just talking | Permalink
>
> Comments
> Thanks for coming all the way out there, Pat, and for bringing Morgan.
> It was great to meet you.
>
> Posted by: cresmer | November 08, 2005 at 07:36 AM
>
> It was great to meet you, Pat. Sarah and I had a lot of fun too.
>
> Posted by: scully | November 08, 2005 at 09:11 AM
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "McKnight, Gisele"
> To:
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:53 PM
> Subject: David Amos
>
> Hello Lisa,
> David Amos asked me to contact you. I met him last June after he
> became an independent (not representing any political party) candidate
> in our federal election that was held June 28. He was a candidate in
> our constituency of Fundy (now called Fundy-Royal).
> I wrote a profile story about him, as I did all other candidates. That
> story appeared in the Kings County Record June 22. A second story,
> written by one of my reporters, appeared on the same date, which was a
> report on the candidates' debate held June 18.
> As I recall David Amos came last of four candidates in the election.
> The winner got 14,997 votes, while Amos got 358. I have attached the
> two stories that appeared, as well as a photo taken by reporter Erin
> Hatfield during the debate. I couldn't find the photo that ran, but
> this one is very similar.
>
> Gisele McKnight editor
> Kings County Record
> Sussex, New Brunswick
> Canada
> 506-433-1070
>
> Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd
> By Erin Hatfield
> "If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
> world is all screwed up, rearrange it."
> The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
> the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
> watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
> unofficial, theme song for the debate.
> The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
> they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
> Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
> chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
> left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
> mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
> the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.
> The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was
> organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage
> of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record
> and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.
> Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
> responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
> exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
> Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
> other on their answers and criticizing eachothers’ party leaders.
> Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
> questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic
> relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
> response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's
> getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."
> Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his
> party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but
> well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am
> on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better
> places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters
> shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.
> The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At
> one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in
> front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the
> voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According to
> Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and second
> readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted, at
> final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to
> register sex offenders rather than register the property of law
> abiding citizens."
> The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and
> women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman
> yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron
> spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.
> Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy
> Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You’re out of touch," Armstrong
> yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of
> post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged
> Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time,
> anyplace," Armstrong responded.
> As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate,
> candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and
> fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making
> process for the June 28 vote.
> Cutline – David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his
> favourite possessions—motorcycles.
> McKnight/KCR
>
> The Unconventional Candidate
> David Amos Isn’t Campaigning For Your Vote, But….
> By Gisele McKnight
> FUNDY—He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
> wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
> that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."
> Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot—David Amos.
> The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife
> and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from
> running for office in Canada.
> One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail
> to meet Elections Canada requirements.
> When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his
> favourite place to do so—Fundy.
> Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his
> dissatisfaction with politicians.
> "I’ve become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he
> said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."
> The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in
> 1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he
> needed to change his life.
> "I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that
> sometimes in midlife."
> So Amos, who’d lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners
> motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952
> Panhead motorcycle.
> "Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact)
> experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you
> renew your faith in mankind – you help anyone you can, you never ask
> for anything, but you take what they offer."
> For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs
> and conversation all over North America.
> Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son
> and a daughter and become a house-husband – Mr. Mom, as he calls
> himself.
> He also describes himself in far more colourful terms—a motorcyclist
> rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed
> individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud
> Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."
> Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his life.
> "But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said.
> "It’s alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"
> Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.
> "I didn’t appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door
> interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can
> call me. I’m not going to drive my opinions down their throats."
> And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.
> "I won’t take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It’s
> not about money. It goes against what I’m fighting about."
> What he’s fighting for is the discussion of issues – tainted blood,
> the exploitation of the Maritimes’ gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
> name a few.
> "The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs – fishing,
> farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I’m
> death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
> (NAFTA) out the window.
> NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
> easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.
> Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.
> "There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
> especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
> Don’t necessarily vote for me, but vote."
> Although…if you’re going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have
> your X by his name.
> "I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and
> say, ‘what the hell.’"
>
> THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
> THE TRIAL COURT
> DORCHESTER, SS. DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT
> THE COMMONWEALTH OF )
> MASSACHUSETTS ) CRIMINAL ACTION
> ) DOCKET NO. 0407CR004623
> v. )
> )
> DAVID R. AMOS )
> AFFIDAVIT OF DAVID R. AMOS
> Now comes, David R. Amos, a Citizen of Canada and a Legal Permanent
> Resident of the USA and asserts his Constitutional Rights pursuant to
> Title 42 Sections 1981, 1982, 1985 and 1986 of the Federal Code and
> freely swears under the penalties of perjury that the following
> statements are true and to the best of his knowledge.
> On September 3rd, 2004 I returned to the USA and stood before the
> Dorchester District Court in response to a summons served upon my home
> in Milton MA dated August 13th, 2004.
> On September 3rd, 2004 I reported to the probation officer as ordered
> after he joked and made fun of me he directed me to serve upon the
> District Attorney the many original wiretap tapes that I had promised
> I would bring to court and ask if they wished to continue. The
> District Attorney Office wished to prosecute me so I returned to the
> probation office and the required documentation was filled out. I did
> not discuss the matter with anyone working for the Commonwealth on
> Septmber 3rd or since that time other than register my indignation
> about the lack of diligence, professional behavior and malicious acts
> practiced against me in an effort to impeach my character.
> On September 3rd, 2004, before any hearing of the matter began I
> protested the fact that the Clerk Buckley had claimed that I was
> pleading not guilty. I had made no plea whatsoever. I refused to waive
> any of my Rights and I demanded that the court prove its jurisdiction
> to hear the matter.
> For over a period of almost three months I had tried to resolve the
> issues of this matter with the Clerk’s Office of this court, the
> Boston Police Dept., the Police Commissioner, the City’s Legal Dept.
> the Mayor’s office, the Suffolk County District Attorney’s Office, The
> Governor’s Office, the US Ambassador to Canada, the Royal Canadian
> Mounted Police. CSIS and the Canadian Consulate in Boston. I was
> refused the right to know what the allegations against me were and no
> one would discuss my concerns about the possibility of foul play. I
> knew I had done nothing wrong and I had fully disclosed the
> circumstances to the Suffolk County District Attorney as Chief Justice
> Robert A. Mulligan had suggested. I had received an answer from the DA
> weeks before he was willing to prosecute me on false charges. I had no
> understanding of the matter. I had not been given information to work
> with and no one would speak to me. If the District Attorney Daniel F.
> Conley had acted ethically and diligently the lawyer, Angel Troccoli
> and her cohorts within the law firm of Dane M. Shulman should have
> been the ones charged with criminal actions against me.
> On September 3rd after the hearing and another hearing was marked for
> today October 1st, Judge Coffey ordered ADA attempting to prosecute me
> to give me a copy of the documents that I was entitled to view. In
> return I gave her my Canadian contact number so that we may confer
> about this matter. I then returned to Canada to defend my rights and
> freedom. The ADA never called. I was not surprised because upon
> viewing the material provided I discovered that there is in fact no
> complaint against me.
> The complaint in this matter is not signed or witnessed by anyone.
> Apparently the DA did not expect me to make it to court on September
> 3rd and certainly did not wish to discuss it with Canadian
> authorities. I now consider the DA Conley to be just another corrupt
> politician just like Tom Finneran and further proof of why it was so
> necessary for me to go to Canada and run for Parliament in order to
> speak in a public forum of my knowledge of public corruption. I gave
> all the crooks to the last possible minute for one to act ethically
> and uphold the Public Trust. All I got in return was continued
> harassment with the little perk of Colonel Foley quitting his job
> before I left and Tom Finneran quitting his as soon as I got back. It
> appears that I must complain of the Queen and President Bush if no one
> in public service is willing to uphold the law and act within the
> scope of their employment.
> For the record I must state the reason I was alarmed by this malicious
> action against me. The fact is it was the Trail Court of Massachusetts
> on April 1st, 2003 that had made false allegations against me to
> agents of the DHS claiming that I had threatened the life of George W.
> Bush. Now the same court was demanding that I return to the USA to
> stand in court and answer charges it knew to be false the morning
> after the President’s big Political Speech in New York. I had no doubt
> whatsoever that the DHS would pounce on me at the border and use a
> policy of rather than safe than sorry upon me and take me away for the
> benefit of many a low man in high places. The RCMP would do nothing to
> protect me and in fact attempted to run me out of Canada on Sept 2nd
> That was the very day of the Republican National Convention was much
> in the news about protests and presidential propaganda. In order to be
> of no possible threat to the President I was compelled to come to the
> USA after the President left New York and drive all night in order to
> appear in court on the morning of the 3rd.
> The most alarming fact of all is that everybody knows that I am bounty
> hunting for Whitey Bulger. The order to come to his old stomping
> grounds and amongst his friends by the same corrupt justice system
> that allowed him to practice his criminal behavior for so long and
> then allow him to escape justice is indeed a very malicious summons.
> April 1st, 2003 was also the only day that I ever met with the lawyer,
> Angela Troccoli before Sept 3rd. I argued her before Judge Livingstone
> in Plymouth Probate Court. I have argued her again in Norfolk Probate
> Court on Sept. 21st, 2004. That court found it necessary for no stated
> reason to place six court guards around me. I am far more than a mere
> acquaintance to her but obviously a rather formidable litigant against
> her criminal actions. I did send her emails asking her to ask her
> clients to stop harassing me with attached photos of the proof. The
> emails were necessary because she would not return my phone calls and
> sent my correspondence to her partner Dane M. Shulman to Barry
> Bachrach claiming that I was his client. I am not and never was. Mr.
> Bachrach had informed Troccoli many times that he only represented my
> wife, Jean F. O’Meara because the court had Stricken my right to do so
> pursuant to M.G.L 201B.
> Barry Bachrach has now withdrawn from all of my wife’s matters with my
> assent because of a conflict of interests over one of his partners and
> myself about a fraudulent Title V inspection. However he is an
> important witness to be called because he has complete knowledge of
> all my contact with Troccoli during the time frame that I have been
> accused.
> Barry Bachrach also has several original wiretap tapes in his
> possession in case the ones given to the District Attorney have
> disappeared like so much of my other material has.
> On April 1st, 2003 I became aware that Troccoli and the Massachusetts
> Trial Court had practiced fraud against me and had created a Notice of
> Appearance in my name with a false document in order to strike me and
> cover up their own wrongs.
> On April 1st, 2003 I had also spoken to a Judge in Quincy District
> Court in my best effort to have the court place a restraining order
> against my brother in laws William, Robert and Brian O’Meara in my
> name because after I had tried to do so a few days before in my wife’s
> name under her Durable Power of Attorney the court laughed at me and
> denied it. Within a day of my first appearance in Quincy District
> Court William O’Meara called my wife at her work and implied that the
> homes would burn down and he was willing to pay the insurance
> premiums. Those same insurance premiums were continued to be paid by
> us and one policy was canceled over one month after the property in
> Plymouth was destroyed by Troccoli clients. The Plymouth Probate Court
> called a Trial quickly with no notification to the litigants after
> Sept 3rd and on September 9th it authorized a very fraudulent real
> estate sale about a property that had been illegally destroyed for
> five months.
> The lawyer Troccoli and the Massachusetts Trial Court have been
> assisting the criminal actions of my brother in laws and many others
> in order to protect the interests of many lawyers and politicians from
> my actions in other courts.
> My wife’s family have forged her signature on a Purchase and Sale
> Agreement, created fraudulent Title V inspection, broke into our home,
> assited in the theft of her rightful inheritance, stolen personal
> property and food, made false allegations against me in other states,
> threatened to burn down the homes and harassed us on sometimes a daily
> basis with the knowledge and assistance of several Police Departments.
> It is time we sought relief.
> Whereas two of my most recent documents have disappeared from the
> Public Record in two countries I have attached them to this affidavit
> for the court and the public to view. Exhibit A is a Motion to Dismiss
> Troccoli’s latest malicious action. It was filed on September 13th,
> 2004 and stricken from the Public Record by Judge Langlois on
> September 21st. Exhibit B is a copy of two letters with the same
> enclosures that were sent to the RCMP in Newfoundland byway of the
> Canada Post and one was sent to the Canadian Consulate by US Mail.
> Both mailings were tracked and not received. They are obviously now in
> the possession of some sort of secret authority. As the court views
> these documents it can easily see what I say is true and my material
> is of no concern for the public safety. They are filed in the public
> record for the benefit of all in my best effort to see that the Public
> Trust is upheld. I have also brought to court a case of documents
> requested by Utica Mutual Insurance Company of New York to investigate
> the actions of their client Jan Whiting. However once they knew the
> truth they refused to accept or pay for what they had requested. If
> the court deems it necessary I shall file it into evidence to refute
> the false allegations made against me.
> Since I have last appeared in this court a great deal has transpired
> that cannot be told of within this affidavit but it concerns the
> pursuit of justice for many people in two counties. Much has been done
> by many to stop my friends and I in revealing the truth of our
> concerns. Thus far we have been able to thwart our adverasies actions.
> The court should pray that it does not get our blood on its hands. The
> proof of some of what I state can be found in Exhibit B.
> Signed before the court and
> under the Pains and
> Penalties of Perjury by
> Dated October 1st , 2004 David R.Amos, Pro Se
> 153 Alvin Ave.
> Milton, MA. 02186
> 617 698-6549
>
> Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 07:31:06 -0800 (PST)
> From: David Amos
> Subject: I am on the phone to you two right now may I suggest that you
> not ignore me anymore
> To: jlaskin@torys.com, jterry@torys.com.
> CC: atinfo@torys.com, ggartner@torys.com, jscheine@torys.com
>
>
> 416.865.7380 John A. Terry
> 416.865.7317John B. Laskin
>
> Law firm set to pay $30M settlement to Hollinger
> CTV.ca News Staff
> One of Canada's most prominent law firms has tentatively agreed to pay
> at least $30 million US in a settlement to Hollinger International
> Inc. for its role in deals that saw Conrad Black and some of his
> deputies pocket millions of dollars.
> The Globe and Mail reports that Tory's LLP could be about to make one
> of the largest payments ever made by a law firm to settle allegations
> that it failed to act in a client's best interests.
> Sources told The Globe that the two sides are working on drafting
> documents for the agreement and that Hollinger International could
> announce the lucrative settlement as early as next week.
> A spokesman for Chicago-based Hollinger International declined to
> comment and a spokesman for Torys did not return phone calls, The
> Globe reports.
> Torys has 330 lawyers in Toronto and New York. It's unclear whether
> the firm's partners will have to personally contribute to the payout.
> Torys is a member of a private insurance exchange that is funded by a
> number of other major Canadian law firms and reinsured by a variety of
> insurance companies.
> It is believed that the exchange, called the Canadian Lawyers
> Liability Assurance Society, has enough funds and insurance coverage
> to absorb most of the settlement costs.
> The payout will be a huge public relations blow for Torys, but rival
> law firms said the firm's strong reputation and blue-chip corporate
> clients, including Brookfield Asset Management Inc., Rogers
> Communications Inc. and Thomson Corp., should help it pull through.
> "This settlement allows the firm to put all the controversy behind it
> so that it can carry on," a senior official with a rival law firm told
> The Globe.
> It's believed that Hollinger International notified Torys in writing
> of its intention to launch a suit against the firm on the grounds that
> it failed to act in the company's best interests during transactions
> that enriched Black.
> Torys was Hollinger International's chief law firm from 1999 until
> Black resigned from the company in 2003, when the company parted ways
> with the law firm.
> The allegations centre on the multiple roles Torys played as an
> adviser to Hollinger International and two of Black's holding
> companies when Hollinger International sold $2.1 billion US of assets
> to CanWest Global Communications Corp. in 2000.
> It's very unusual for law firms to simultaneously advise separate
> parties during a transaction, without client consent, because of the
> perceived difficulties in demonstrating undivided loyalty to more than
> one client.
> Sources told The Globe that Torys allegedly failed to inform Hollinger
> International that it was also advising Black's companies, Ravelston
> Corp. and Hollinger Inc., during the CanWest transaction.
> Hollinger International has criticized Torys for not alerting them
> that $51.8-million of proceeds from the CanWest sale was transferred
> to Black, his private holding company and three of his deputies.
> The personal payments are the subject of criminal charges levelled
> against Black and some of his former colleagues by the U.S. Department
> of Justice earlier this month.
> It is also understood that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
> is reviewing Torys' role in the CanWest transaction as part of a
> broader examination of Hollinger International's disclosure practices.
> Large personal payments are usually required to be disclosed to
> shareholders on a timely basis.
> But the $51.8 million US of transfers to Black and his executives were
> only publicly revealed when a U.S. law firm spotted the unusual
> transfers in 2002 -- six months after the CanWest deal was completed.
> In a report last year, a special committee of Hollinger International
> directors criticized Torys and the company's auditor KPMG for failing
> to alert the board about a number of questionable transactions
> involving Black.
> Torys has also been named in a Canadian class-action suit that alleges
> Torys, Black, KPMG and others failed in their duty to protect the
> interests of Hollinger International shareholders.
>
> Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 17:41:39 -0800 (PST)
> From: David Amos
> Subject: So it is Xmas EH? Say hey to the Maritimer Landslide Annie
> for me. Will ya?
> To: Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, Thompson.M@parl.gc.ca, Sorenson.K@parl.gc.ca,
> Richardson.L@parl.gc.ca, Prentice.J@parl.gc.ca, Penson.C@parl.gc.ca,
> Obhrai.D@parl.gc.ca, Mills.B@parl.gc.ca, Kenney.J@parl.gc.ca,
> Merrifield.R@parl.gc.ca, Menzies.T@parl.gc.ca, Johnston.D@parl.gc.ca,
> Jean.B@parl.gc.ca, Hanger.A@parl.gc.ca, Goldring.P@parl.gc.ca,
> Chatters.D@parl.gc.ca, Casson.R@parl.gc.ca, Benoit.L@parl.gc.ca,
> Anders.R@parl.gc.ca, Ablonczy.D@parl.gc.ca, INFO7@elections.ca
> CC: Fletcher.S@parl.gc.ca, Bezan.J@parl.gc.ca, Mark.I@parl.gc.ca,
> Pallister.B@parl.gc.ca, Smith.J@parl.gc.ca, Toews.V@parl.gc.ca,
> Tweed.M@parl.gc.ca, davidamos@bsn1.net, webb@caut.ca, pilon@caut.ca,
> morgan@caut.ca, National@cbc.ca, lcampenella@ledger.com,
> McKnight.Gisele@kingscorecord.
> martine.turcotte@bell.ca, news@ctv.ca, am@ctv.ca, diane.bourque@flsc.ca,
> jcrosbie@pattersonpalmer.ca, Mayor@ci.boston.ma.us, Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca
>
>
> Hey
> So it is Xmas EH? Say hey to the Maritimer Landslide Annie for me. Will ya?
> As your Boss and his Deputy Dog brag and Landslide Annie squeaks and
> bitches on Cpac right now. I press send and prepare to run again.
> Methinks Landslide Annie will never get elected again. Do you. I know
> for a fact that I am the one that has got her so upset. It is all over
> but the crying now. Read on then press print on the attached Tiff file
> and the light may dawn on your Marbleheads out west. She talks of a
> Global connected world and asks us to choose between to crooks. The
> money grubbing lawyer Paul Martin or your evil Bush supporting right
> wing boss Harper. I sincerely hope that not one of you gets to take a
> seat in the New Year in the 39th Parliament.
> In my humble opinion you lapdogs for Bush all have failed the Canadian
> people in your obligation to uphold the public trust and protect our
> common interests. Harper proved to all he was willing to make backroom
> deals with Humpty Dumpty as soon as he had Clarkson, the Queen’s
> malevolent spendthrift alter her speech from the throne in order to
> have Martin agree to the Yankee missile defence scheme.
> The 38th Parliament should never have taken its seat if any Member of
> Parliament had used the evidence of crime I provided them. You
> Conservative MPs who demand integrity of liberals should have helped
> me to impeach George Bush and Paul Martin out of the gate last year.
> Stevey Boy Harper should not have been surprised when the old lawyer
> Martin went back on his word after he got his way and was allowed to
> buy as many favours as possible with the hard earned taxpayer dime.
> Even the nasty Connie Rice got huffy about that. Petey Baby MacKay
> proved to all the PC’s and the Westerner David Orchard years ago that
> a lawyer’s words ain’t worth a damn even when he puts them in writing.
> Didn’t he? Not all Maritimers are honourable. However not all
> Maritimers are defeatists either as your Boss Harper likes to suggest.
> Many Maritimers know better than to trust lawyers especially ones such
> as Petey Baby MacKay and Johnny Crosbie particularly when they seek
> the counsel of the crook, Brian Mulroney.
> All that said I must thank you for the opportunity to run for
> Parliament again and speak about your malice whilst I sue the Crown.
> You fine and fancy folks are one year too later but better late than
> never EH?
> Should I say Merry Xmass to all and to all a Good Night? Naw. Bah
> humbug works better for me I sincerely hope to Cya’ll in Court real
> soon. In a court of law each and everyone of you can be held
> accountable. The Canadian government certainly needs to be changed but
> none of you have earned the right to bring it about. None of you
> should feel blessed to follow a leader such as Harper. I hope it is a
> wash and many other people will fill your seats. Many amongst them
> there will be an ethical few. Here’s hoping I am allowed to prove in
> court in the New Year what I know to be true about all of you.
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
> Posted by: David R. Amos | December 01, 2005 at 02:24 PM
>
> http://calgarygrit.blogspot.
>
> http://www.tomgpalmer.com/
>
> http://politblogo.typepad.com/
>
> Comments
> May 11th, 2005
>
> Ambassador: H.E. Mr. Allan Rock
> One Dag Hammarskjold Plaza
> 885 Second Avenue , 14th Floor
> New York , NY 10017
>
> Ambassador Franky McKenna
> Canadian Embassy
> 501 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
> Washington, DC 20001
>
> Assistant Director Louis M. Reigel III
> Federal Bureau of Investigation
> J. Edgar Hoover Building
> 935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
> Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
>
> Special Agent David Price
> FBI Minneapolis
> Suite 1100
> 111 Washington Avenue, South
> Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401-2176
>
> RE: Rampant Public Corruption in Canada and the USA
>
>
> Hey,
>
>
> Now that Paul Martin has finally set the date for his confidence vote,
> methinks its time to pack my bags and head for home. I must raise some
> serious political hell in the Maritimes before the Commonwealth of
> Massachusetts does its worst to bankrupt my wife and put my kids on
> the street before I can expose the rampant public corruption. This is
> also a very good day to prove within the USA that we are well aware of
> each other and of my concerns and allegations in order to stress test
> the integrity of the US Mail. It and the Canada Post have failed me
> big time in recent years particularly just before the Yankees falsely
> imprisoned me last year for the benefit of George W. Bush, John Kerry
> and Paul Martin to name a few. I have no doubt whatsoever each of you
> dudes know more about me than I do about you. However that does not
> mean that I have not studied each of you a lot more than the ordinary
> layman. Just so we are clear, I have no respect for any of you. I know
> that all of you are as crooked as Chief Mearn, his cops and the
> lawyers who are coming into our home tomorrow without a warrant. This
> mail should prove your malice and willingness to support crime and
> public corruption.
>
>
> Pursuant to my many emails, phone calls and faxes etc., you will find
> enclosed as promised exactly the same material I served upon the
> Solicitor Generals Teddy Olson and landslide Annie McLellan last year
> before I ran for Parliament last year. The CD of the copy of wiretap
> tape # 139 is served upon you as officers of the court and FBI Agents
> in order that it may be properly investigated. Franky got this stuff
> and more last year. The FBI got even more the year before. Perhaps
> they should go find the original tapes that the Suffolk County
> District Attorney and Special Agent in Charge Ken Kaiser have been
> playing dumb about for far too long. This material was good enough to
> impeach George W. Bush last year and cause many people to quit or lose
> their jobs. It is every bit as valuable today and you all know it. Ask
> the many people whose names can be found within these documents or
> Franky Boy or Claude Richer, Allan Rock’s lawyer buddy in the RCMP
> about this stuff before you call me a liar. As you all know I am out
> of jail on bail pending my upcoming criminal trial in front of a jury
> of my peers. I have the right to remain silent in the USA. I will
> employ different rights in Canada and say a lot.
>
>
> What I choose to say while stumping for a seat in Parliament in Canada
> is of my concern not yours. If you dudes do your jobs here and I act
> ethically and legally up home with luck the world will be far better
> off in short order. I have already checked the rules with the people
> working for Elections Canada. We agree it is perfectly legal for an
> innocent man to run for Parliament while being prosecuted with false
> charges in the wrong jurisdiction and venue in the USA. Everybody
> knows I can secure my personal freedom quicker in a political forum in
> Canada rather than argue crooked judges in the USA. They have already
> imprisoned me on bullshit charges without even reading me my rights or
> telling me why I was in jail. The crooks are not going to have a
> sudden fit of ethical behavior now without it becoming a matter of
> political will. We all know it is high time for a change, the sooner
> the better for the Maritimes as well as the rest of the world. What
> better politician to argue with than a right wing lawyer named Rob
> Moore?
>
>
> As you all no doubt know I have been talking to many people within the
> UN and have sent many much of my stuff. You all must have laughed as
> hard as I did when the Cubans were afraid to talk about my stuff. I
> must agree with George Bush about one thing. The UN is certainly in
> need of an overhaul. Yet we all know that nasty dudes like Maurice
> Strong’s buddy, Paul A. Volcker, the Former North American Chairman of
> the Trilateral Commission and Karl Rove’s puppet, John Bolton are just
> going to make matters worse. The same holds true with the turncoat
> Robert C. Pozen. He now offers advice to Bush on how to fix Social
> Security simply because I sent him running for cover with my Putnam
> Investment concerns and the malevolent media control of Global
> Corporations. Feel free to argue me or act ethically. You choose. I
> don’t care. Franky Boy knows he is way past too late. I am just
> rubbing his nose it before I talk a lot about him and his failure to
> uphold the public trust in our old stomping grounds up home. I can’t
> help but wonder how he explained his “Harper is a lapdog for Bush”
> dogma to Karl Rove and his nasty cohorts. I suspect it was an allowed
> comment from an insider of the Carlyle Group. Don’t you? We all know
> Stephen Harper would never fit in that group. He is as dumb as a post.
> All of his successes playing at politicking have just been a matter of
> luck and playing on the PC and Liberal scandals. Harper is kinda scary
> to me. He has a truly awful agenda in store for all Canadians like
> evil old T. Alex Hickman and Johnny Crosbie did for our Newfys.
>
>
> Sometimes less is more. So in conclusion I will just quote former
> Inspector General of the DHS Clark Kent Irwin and simply say it would
> have benefited all if he had taken his own advice way back in November
> of 2003 when he had an important job.
>
>
> POGO: “Any advice for your fellow public servants?”
> Irwin: “Well, just do your job and let the political chips fall where
> they may. Unless you’re willing to do that, it seems to me you
> shouldn’t take the job in the first place.”
>
>
> What say you?
>
>
> Cya’ll in Court
> David R. Amos
> 153 Alvin Ave.
> Milton MA. 02186
>
> They got their mail now. Check for yourself
>
>
> USPS Track & Confirm
>
> Current Status
>
> You entered 0302 1790 0001 6045 6592
>
> We attempted to deliver your item at 6:58 am on May 14, 2005 in
> MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 and a notice was left. It can be redelivered or
> picked up at the Post Office. If the item is unclaimed, it will be
> returned to the sender. Information, if available, is updated every
> evening. Please check again later.
>
> Here is what happened earlier:
> ACCEPTANCE, May 12, 2005, 9:30 am, QUINCY, MA 02169
>
> Current Status
>
> You entered 0302 1790 0001 6045 6608
>
> We attempted to deliver your item at 8:04 am on May 14, 2005 in NEW
> YORK, NY 10017 and a notice was left. It can be redelivered or picked
> up at the Post Office. If the item is unclaimed, it will be returned
> to the sender. Information, if available, is updated every evening.
> Please check again later.
>
> Here is what happened earlier:
> ACCEPTANCE, May 12, 2005, 9:32 am, QUINCY, MA 02169
>
> Current Status
>
> You entered 0302 1790 0001 6045 6615
>
> We attempted to deliver your item at 4:03 am on May 14, 2005 in
> WASHINGTON, DC 20535 and a notice was left. It can be redelivered or
> picked up at the Post Office. If the item is unclaimed, it will be
> returned to the sender. Information, if available, is updated every
> evening. Please check again later.
>
> Here is what happened earlier:
> ARRIVAL AT UNIT, May 14, 2005, 4:01 am, WASHINGTON, DC 20022
> ACCEPTANCE, May 12, 2005, 9:31 am, QUINCY, MA 02169
>
> Current Status
>
> You entered 0302 1790 0001 6045 6707
>
> Your item was accepted at 9:32 am on May 12, 2005 in QUINCY, MA 02169.
> Information, if available, is updated every evening. Please check
> again later
>
>
> Posted by: David R. Amos | May 18, 2005 05:48 PM
>
> Posted by: David R. Amos | December 01, 2005 at 02:28 PM
>
> comment spam anyone?! it certainly took me a while to scroll down
> through all that. ugh! the previous "commenter" should write a book,
> as he definitely appears to be on his way to doing just that! ;->
>
> Posted by: mwb | December 02, 2005 at 06:19 AM
>
> That is an understatement
>
> Posted by: David R. Amos | December 15, 2005 at 07:48 PM
>
> To Whom It May Concern;
>
> Beware David Amos. He is dangerously mentally ill and a danger to
> anyone who disagrees with him.
>
> A Friend
>
> Posted by: A Friend | December 17, 2005 at 10:03 PM
>
> Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 09:55:05 -0800 (PST)
> From: David Amos
> Subject: Tisk Tisk slander is slander particularly in the USA EH?
> To: dljs@hotmail.com, Scott.A@parl.gc.ca
> CC: yell@thefibber.com, Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, Layton.J@parl.gc.ca,
> Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca, Martin.P@parl.gc.ca, news957@rci.rogers.com,
> andrew@andrewhouse.ca, mucki@shaw.ca, pduchastel@gmail.com,
> svend@svendrobinson.com, garth@garth.ca, anwarnaqvi@ndp.ca,
> edchudak@ndp4me.ca, ghubbers@greenparty.ca, krice@greenparty.ca,
> info@cindysilver.ca, jpal@telus.net, NationalVP@chp.ca,
> jevans@greenparty.ca, editor@cannabisculture.com,
> MediaRelations@crtc.gc.ca, atvnews@ctv.ca, events@cpac.ca,
> admin@cbcwatch.ca, john@johnweston.ca, bforst@dccnet.com,
> info@robinbaird.ca, editor@thetyee.ca
>
>
> Hey
>
>
> I notice the corrupt dudes at CBC have been remaining true to course
> and ignoring me as usual.
>
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/canadavotes/
>
>
> Surprise surprise Nodice did not
>
>
> http://www.nodice.ca/
>
>
> Last but not least the Queen says it is so.
>
>
> http://www.elections.ca/
>
> Obviously after a bit of a struggle Kingsley's crowd finally allowed
> me on the ballot in Frederiction much to the chagrin of about seventy
> or so people who nominated me that Elections Canada claimed had no
> right to vote. I kinda figured that it would be a battle so I got many
> more signatures that they could not deny so easily. I must say you
> crooked politicians play wicked games even at Xmas time EH? Rest
> assured I am ready to play your wicked game. You nasty dudes can call
> a pious truce at Xmas time but that rule don't hold for me. I ain't
> religoius and belong to no party whatsoever. However at least I
> understand the word integrity.
> Methinks this person in Nova Scotia who ain't quite certain whether he
> is a man or a woman made a big mistake calling me dangerously mentally
> ill EH?
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
> http://patpolitical.typepad.
>
> To Whom It May Concern;
> Beware David Amos. He is dangerously mentally ill and a danger to
> anyone who disagrees with him.
> A Friend
> Posted by: A Friend | December 17, 2005 at 10:03 PM
>
> http://www.cybertown.com/
>
> Apartment 97 - Deb
>
> I went on-line two years ago and my family hasn't seen me since! I've
> been learning about and creating my first home page for the last
> several weeks and am quite proud of the results. In real life I'm a
> stay-at-home Mom, but do take the time to write political commentary
> and when I'm feeling flighty I take a spin on my in-line skates.
> dljs@hotmail.com
>
> http://johnfowles.org.uk/
>
>
> Michael Morash - 10/28/98 23:39:45
> My Email:dljs@hotmail.com
> Where I Live: Dartmouth Nova Scotia
> Age: 42
> Years as a fan: 42
> Favorite song: Early Morning Rain
> Favorite album or CD: All of them!
>
> Michael Morash
> Peggys Cove, NS B0J 2N0
> (902) 823-2562
>
> Posted by: David R. Amos | January 01, 2006 at 09:21 PM
>
> David Amos would like everyone to beleive he is a threat. He's a bag
> of wind. The whole world is wrong,,,,,,,,,,he is the only one who is
> right.This is his full time job,BSing everyone.
>
> Posted by: BobO'Meara | January 18, 2006 at 12:17 PM
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> To: "mcknight. gisele" <mcknight.Gisele@dailygleaner.
> <bowie.adam@dailygleaner.com>; <t.j.burke@gnb.ca>; "Byron Prior"
> <alltrue@nl.rogers.com>; "webo" <webo@xplornet.com>; <David.ALWARD@gnb.ca>;
> "carl. davies" <carl.davies@gnb.ca>; "PoliticsNB" <PoliticsNB@hotmail.com>;
> "nb. premier" <nb.premier@gmail.com>; "nbpolitico" <nbpolitico@gmail.com>;
> "gypsy-blog" <gypsy-blog@hotmail.com>; "Richard Harris"
> <injusticecoalition@hotmail.
> "dohertylaw" <dohertylaw@rogers.com>; "tomp. young"
> <tomp.young@atlanticradio.
> Ray" <deanr0032@hotmail.com>; <william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.
> Wagener" <producer@onsecondthought.tv>; "KAROL KAROLAK"
> <karol_karolak@rogers.com>; "Mohawk Nation News" <kahentinetha2@yahoo.com>;
> "jacques_poitras" <jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>; "Robert. Jones"
> <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>; "Edith. Cody-Rice" <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>
> Cc: "mclaughlin.heather" <mclaughlin.heather@
> Foran" <John.Foran@gnb.ca>; "dan. bussieres" <dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>;
> <danny.copp@fredericton.ca>
> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 11:32 PM
> Subject: For the record the Irving newsrag in Fat Fred City knows that
> the
> noname "Boogie Loogie" chickenshit is not mean old me.
>
>
> I must ask is this their way of taking a cheap shop at me byway of the
> comments? Relax I am not offended. I am laughing at your petty
> nonsense.
>
> The chickenshit "Boogie Loogie" is correct you greedy fools are
> basically arguing about the colour of the drapes while the house burns
> down around us all.
>
> It should be obvious that I am not this arsehole anyway I do not
> employ such snobby words as this noname no balls character "Boogie
> Loogie" does. Everybody and his dog knows that I am far more crude and
> rude than that just as any justifiably pissed off Maritimer should be
> in a purportedlu "JUST" Democracy.
>
> You all know that I only post comments and email in my true name and
> that the Irvings banned me long ago just like the CBC, Chucky,
> Spinksey and the Gypsy and nearly everyone else has. I suspect
> Chucky's old buddy the Iron Horse of a fraidy cat lawyer will step up
> to the plate and save the day one again on befalf of the French
> welfare bum with five brains and not one lick of common sense. Lawyer
> like that love the limelight and rest assured Robert Jones of CBC will
> focas this little circus bigtime once again.
>
> Now I have a question who the hell is this Tyler Durden arsehole that
> Irvings love so much? I don't find him in the Moncton phone book but I
> do notice that he posts a lot of bullshit everywhere. Does his real
> name start with Ritchie or is he some other chickenshit spin doctor?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> http://dailygleaner.
>
> Province's support of active living questionedPublished Friday April
> 24th,
> 2009
>
> By ADAM BOWIE
> bowie.adam@dailygleaner.com
>
> 21 Comment(s)
>
> About 60 protesters rallied on the lawn of the legislature Thursday to
> demand the provincial government reverse a decision to cut winter
> services at Mactaquac Provincial Park.
>
> STEPHEN MACGILLIVRAY PHOTO
> Park decision decried: Protesters don’t want the Mactaquac Provincial
> Park closed in the winter. Tourism Minister Stuart Jamieson talks with
> protester Jennifer Beckley of Keswick on Thursday.
>
>
> STEPHEN MACGILLIVRAY PHOTO
> Under arrest: Blogger Charles LeBlanc, centre, was arrested Thursday
> outside the legislature in Fredericton. LeBlanc is escorted to a
> waiting police car by Sgt. Andrew MacDonald, right, and an
> unidentified officer.
>
>
> STEPHEN MACGILLIVRAY PHOTO
> See Adam's Story Keep our Park open in the winter: Protestors walk to
> the New Brunswick Legislature in Fredericton on Thursday to protest to
> proposed closure of Mactaquac provincial Park in the winter months.
> Here making a snowman from snow brought from the park from left are:
> Kyla Anderson, 9; : Aaron Grey, 7; Brianna MacMinn, 5, and Larissa
> Grey, 9.
>
> The Liberal government said it would cut winter activities as a
> cost-saving measure when it released this year's provincial budget.
> Demonstrators chanted "Save Our Park," waved homemade signs and
> several children built a snowman - using snow from the park - in front
> of the building's front steps.
> Norah Profit-Grey said she can't understand why the province would
> want to make it more difficult for people to use the park.
> She said the decision will make it harder for schools to schedule
> winter outings.
> "The school district sends children from basically every school up to
> the Mactaquac park for different educational programs. If it's closed
> in the wintertime, all of those programs will be cut," she said.
> "This is the perfect place to teach the kids about the outdoors. We're
> constantly striving to be greener and get them more active, but here
> we are taking away this valuable resource."
> She said the decision is out of step with the province's recent
> wellness campaign and will also make life more difficult for families
> who can't afford to make frequent winter outings.
> "We can't afford to take the kids to Crabbe Mountain every week to go
> skiing, so all of our winter activities are based in Mactaquac,"
> Profit-Grey said.
> Tourism and Parks Minister Stuart Jamieson said the cuts won't mean
> the park is completely closed, but he agreed that services will be
> reduced.
> "We will have the park open on a small basis," he said.
> "For people (to have) a place to park and go skiing and snowshoeing
> and sliding, but we're not going to groom the trails."
> And the cuts will impact nearly all of the park's employees - forcing
> many to accept seasonal work or an early retirement package.
> Jamieson met with protesters at the end of the rally Thursday. He said
> he's been speaking with representatives from local service districts
> about other possible scenarios.
> He said it may be possible for community groups to find the money to
> keep some winter services going.
> "I'm interested in seeing if there is some group that would be
> interested in facilitating a small operation there," he said.
> "We'd help them out to do that."
> Rally organizer Barb Hoyt said that was a disappointing response.
> "I just don't see why they can't work, within government, to do this,"
> she
> said.
> "You know, $600,000 isn't a lot of money. They probably spend that on
> things they don't really need. I really don't think it's a great
> decision."
> Jessica McPhee said it seems like the province made a hasty move.
> "I think a lot of people think they said, 'Oh, there's an economic
> downturn. What are we going to do?'" she said.
> "And they took the most obvious places to cut money - not necessarily
> the best. If they had taken a little time, they could have found some
> better alternatives."
> Protesters waved skis, sleds and crazy carpets to represent the many
> winter activities that could be affected by the budget cuts.
> Kirk MacDonald, Tory MLA for York North, and Jamieson clashed over
> cuts to the provincial park in the legislature during question period
> Thursday.
> MacDonald said 19 employees will be affected by the cuts and many have
> more than 30 years of service.
> "Is this fair? Is this how we reward people who have given 30 years of
> service to this province?''
> Jamieson said the government is concerned about the employees and his
> staff has been meeting with them.
> "For those who want full-time employment, we are looking at other
> departments in which to place them," he said.
> "We have a number of people at Mactaquac who can retire, and several
> have indicated that they would do that," said Jamieson.
> Some people who are staying on seasonally will be reduced to 40 weeks
> of employment and others to 26 weeks as seasonal employees, he said.
> "Nobody is losing their job," said Jamieson."
> MacDonald introduced a motion Thursday afternoon calling on the
> government to look at ways to work with employees to increase revenues
> and decrease expenses so that Mactaquac park can stay open year-round.
> The motion was amended several times by both sides and eventually
> passed unanimously.
> Meanwhile, outside the legislature, the Fredericton Police Force
> arrested blogger Charles LeBlanc during the rally.
> LeBlanc has been banned from the property since 2006.
> Const. Ralph Currie confirmed that police arrested a man during the
> rally, but he wouldn't name the individual.
> He said the man was released with a promise to appear in court at a
> later date. Police are investigating the incident, but Currie said the
> man could face charges related to trespassing and mischief.
> With files by reporter Stephen Llewellyn
>
> Comments (21)
> All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full
> commenting tutorial click here.
> Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor
> community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site
> user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter,
> please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the
> comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.
>
> Showing 21 comments
>
> Charles LeBlanc is one of the only free press operations publishing
> out of Fredericton - Irving media have their obvious bias and CBC are
> hacked appart every budget with federal kleptocrats pulling their
> strings.
>
> Are New Brunswickers going to stand down as the only defense of
> democracy and free society is thrown in jail?
>
> I guess that depends on how many still trust Irving to bring them the
> news.
>
> Daniel Fitzgerald, Nijmegen on 24/04/09 07:12:00 AM ADT
>
>
> Mischief = trying to spread truth across New Brunswick via a Blog.
>
> Smalltown NB, New Brunswick on 24/04/09 07:26:35 AM ADT
>
>
> The other day Charles LeBlanc posted a picture of Public Safety
> Minister John Foran. Then he put a cartoon bubble beside his head
> which read: "I don't give a darn how those kids died!" The reference
> is to the student basketball players from Bathurst.
>
> I believe LeBlanc's blog raises many great issues in the Fredericton
> community, but it also has items like the one mentioned above. To me,
> that ruins any credibility he would like to have.
>
> If he wants to be a serious blogger, he has to create some guidelines
> and stick to them. His personal attacks can sometimes go to far.
> There's a way to criticize people.
>
> News Watcher, NB on 24/04/09 07:50:05 AM ADT
>
>
> His cartoon is no different than any other political cartoon.
>
> It is asinine that he was arrested, again. The province hates him
> because he speaks the truth, and the government just doesn't want to
> hear it (Liberal or PC).
>
> JustRight OfCenter, Fredericton area on 24/04/09 08:22:34 AM ADT
>
>
> Let's hope the squeaky wheel gets the oil. If there are this many
> people who use it regularly, leave it open. You can't remove every
> service just because not every person doesn't use it. Some of these
> cuts are just ridiculous.
>
> Voice of Reason, Everywhere on 24/04/09 08:56:09 AM ADT
>
>
> Charles Leblanc was banned from the Legislature grounds and he is well
> aware of the ban. he has flaunted it many times and it caught up to
> him. The Police were simply doing their jobs.
>
> Charles Leblanc must now face the court and he has supplied all the
> evidence the Crown needs to prove its case on his blog. He has handed
> the Crown the case on a silver platter.
>
> One outcome may even be a court ordered ban from blogging which
> honestly would be a fair sentence in this case. he's a nuisance,
> yelling out of care windows at MLAs, pestering anybody in and around
> the Legislature and posting unsubstantiated and libelous comments
> about anyone he disagrees with on his blog,.
>
> Tyler Durden, Moncton on 24/04/09 08:57:14 AM ADT
>
>
> Mactaquac park is a wonderful place to enjoy winter recreational
> sports such as snowmobiling, cross country skiing, skating, snow
> shoeing and sliding. I use the park every winter for sliding. The hill
> is the best in the area. I hope the government will reconsider their
> decision. Recreation is bound to be the first to go during tough
> economic times, it is no different in a family budget. I am sure that
> a win win solution can be found if the government will be sensitive
> and considerate and give it some thought. I wonder what the $600,000
> cost to keep the park open translates to for each tax paying New
> Brunswicker? Perhaps they can consider a small toll to enter the park
> during the winter season. I wouldn't mind paying $5 per visit per car
> load if it would keep the park running. Just a thought ...
>
> Al Brideau, Fredericton on 24/04/09 09:19:29 AM ADT
>
>
> There are a lot of issues with the media in this province....but to
> say that Charles LeBlanc is a good replacement for them is utterly
> ridiculous. Unless you like being beaten over the head with the same 3
> personal vendettas and poorly drawn cartoons every two days.
>
> JP Kirby, Fredericton on 24/04/09 10:38:11 AM ADT
>
> This comment has been removed due to a violation of canadaeast.com's
> Terms of Use, Section F. Interactive Features. Click here to review
> the Terms of Use.
>
> David Akward, Fredericton on 24/04/09 11:49:50 AM ADT
>
>
> This comment has been removed due to a violation of canadaeast.com's
> Terms of Use, Section F. Interactive Features. Click here to review
> the Terms of Use.
>
> David Akward, Fredericton on 24/04/09 11:50:54 AM ADT
>
>
> All Leblanc did was detract from the real story. He is not a
> journalist. He simply posts his opinion online - just like I do here.
> Most of time it is dribble if not outright falsehood.
>
> G. Murray, Woodstock on 24/04/09 01:53:44 PM ADT
>
>
> Sorry, typed dribble above instead of drivel - much like Charles my
> typing doesn't always follow my brains limited instruction.........
>
> G. Murray, Woodstock on 24/04/09 01:56:00 PM ADT
>
>
> They are trying to set an example with Charles but in reality they are
> creating a strong undercurrent of support for him.
>
> The may find him to be a pain in their butt but they ain't seen
> nothing yet. They claim assault and he was the one assaulted. It is
> all on video so will come in handy. They are upset because Charles
> lodged a complaint the day before against one of the arresting Nazis
> and the Goose Stepper made it personal.
>
> To the politicians and police of New Brunswick be warned. It is the
> citizens that control you, not the other way around.
>
> TMA
>
> Boogie Loogie, Fredericton on 24/04/09 04:40:24 PM ADT
>
>
> Gotta Agree with you G. Murray. Mr. Leblanc has not been a blogger of
> anything socially relevant for years. He attends these protests/events
> not to support their cause or inform but simply as a way of
> shamelessly promoting himself. He does most causes..(like this one) a
> disservice as they almost always end up as nothing more than platform
> to to insult those he currently decides he dislikes back on his blog.
> Anyone that actually believes his blog deserves anymore than a passing
> glance and a shake of the head at the nonsense there in really can't
> be interested in news or facts at all.
>
> D STEWART, Fredericton on 24/04/09 04:50:51 PM ADT
>
>
> To Tyler Durden, Moncton
>
> You are wrong. His rights have been violated and any lawyer could get
> him off the hook. Needless charges and a violation of this man's
> rights.
>
> If the judge does ban him from blogging I will take over. If you think
> Charles was a pain in butt for the power structure of NB wait until
> they have to deal with me.
>
> I have taken on much bigger fish than NB and these chumps will know
> what it is like to be in the 'real' spotlight.
>
> TMA
>
> Boogie Loogie, Fredericton on 24/04/09 04:55:22 PM ADT
>
>
> Boogie Loogie... is that an alias for David Amos? Just curious.
>
> Tyler Durden, Moncton on 24/04/09 05:01:28 PM ADT
>
>
> He was banned. He knew he was banned and yet he continued to troll the
> Legislature grounds taking pictures of himself violating the ban.
>
> How are those facts wrong?
>
> Tyler Durden, Moncton on 24/04/09 05:02:25 PM ADT
>
>
> My name is Thomas Payne.
>
> See my latest video:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> TMA
>
> Boogie Loogie, Fredericton on 24/04/09 05:05:35 PM ADT
>
>
> So, why wait for Charles to lose his job Boogie Loogie? If your that
> passionate about it start blogging. I fear that much like Mr. Leblanc
> your visions of self importance also far exceed that of reality. The
> only undercurrent that anyone need worry about in Fredericton is the
> waters of the St. John river not the rantings of a few Leblanc
> zealots.
>
> D STEWART, Fredericton on 24/04/09 05:17:02 PM ADT
>
>
> To D STEWART:
>
> You are not completely with it are you? Rant, rave, condescend, offer
> little substance, quick to criticize, good little debt slave.
> All of those terms apply to you.
>
> Spend a little time, do some investigation, you will quickly see that
> your fingers are engaged but your brain is not.
>
> Like I said, the NB power brokers are nothing but chumps, peons,
> two-bit flunkies in the grand scheme of things. You fit right in with
> that ilk.
>
> Boogie Loogie, Fredericton on 24/04/09 10:30:04 PM ADT
>
> Well Boogie Loogie if anyone would have first hand knowledge of things
> of little substance it would appear to be you. Living in a world of
> fantasied self importance isn't all that bad a thing as long as you
> confine yourself to the odd bizarre on line commentary and remain
> relatively harmless so more power to you my aberrant friend. No one
> will care that much one way or the other what you have to say but of
> course you are use to that anyway.
>
> D STEWART, Fredericton on 24/04/09 11:04:35 PM ADT
>
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 16:22:25 +0000
Subject: RE: A little Deja Vu for Chucky leblanc and his buddies Don
Macpherso, Sheriff Oram, Mikey Comeau, Carl Urquhart, Dominic Cardy,
David Coon and of course the Fat Fred City Finest and theRCMP
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Rédaction <nouvelle@acadienouvelle.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 08:22:24 -0800
Subject: Re: A little Deja Vu for Chucky leblanc and his buddies Don
Macpherso, Sheriff Oram, Mikey Comeau, Carl Urquhart, Dominic Cardy,
David Coon and of course the Fat Fred City Finest and theRCMP
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
--
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 12:18:58 -0400
Subject: A little Deja Vu for Chucky leblanc and his buddies Don
Macpherso, Sheriff Oram, Mikey Comeau, Carl Urquhart, Dominic Cardy,
David Coon and of course the Fat Fred City Finest and theRCMP
To: "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "carl.urquhart"
<carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, george.oram@gnb.ca, "Mike.Comeau"
<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, matthew.smith@lutz.nb.ca,
maria.powell@lutz.nb.ca, michael.bray@fosterandcompany.
serge.rousselle@gnb.ca, david.eidt@gnb.ca,
mrichard@lawsociety-barreau.
MHutchinson@afn.ca, Carolyn.Bennett@parl.gc.ca,
Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca, marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca,
Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, bruce.northrup@gnb.ca,
Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,
Gunther.Schonfeldt@cpc-cpp.gc.
dominic.leblanc@parl.gc.ca, francois.gravel@
macpherson.don@brunswicknews.
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca,
"Kevin.Vickers" <Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>, "greg.byrne"
<greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, media-medias@gnb.ca, news
<news@dailygleaner.com>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
natalia.johnston@cbc.ca, fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@
denis.landry2@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, oldmaison
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
The story of Tents removal in front of he Justice Building in Fredericton continues!!!
---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 19:17:21 +0000
Subject: RE: Trust that I don't care what Adam Huras and all his
corrupt cohorts falsely claim you people do get my emails
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 13:11:36 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Trust that I don't care what Adam Huras and all his
corrupt cohorts falsely claim you people do get my emails
To: darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca, ht.lacroix@cbc.ca,
sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca, Alex.Johnston@cbc.ca,
bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca, wayne.easter@parl.gc.ca,
dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, julian@julianrenaud.ca,
jbosnitch@gmail.com, Davidc.Coon@gmail.com,
graham.patricia@brunswicknews.
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, Gunther.Schonfeldt@crcc-ccetp.
ian.mcphail@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 10:40:41 -0400
Subject: Trust that I don't care what Adam Huras and all his corrupt
cohorts falsely claim you people do get my emails
To: rickard.mark@brunswicknews.com
oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com, martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca,
leanne.murray@mcinnescooper.
hooper.donna@brunswicknews.com
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, terry.seguin@cbc.ca,
David.Akin@globalnews.ca, bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca,
jlaskin@torys.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Don Macpherson macpherson.don@brunswicknews.
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 06:54:06 -0700
Subject: Out of office Re: Fwd: I just called to talk to Gilles Duval
FYI his email at acadienouvelle.com did not bounce
To: SRS0=gdwY=AQ=gmail.com=motoman
I am on out of the office on a family emergency.
If you are trying to contact me with an urgent news matter, please
contact editor Andrew Waugh at waugh.andrew@brunswicknews.com
--
Don MacPherson
The Daily Gleaner
(506) 458-6479
On 9/15/17, David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 08:13:12 -0400
> Subject: I just called to talk to Gilles Duval FYI his email at
> acadienouvelle.com did not bounce
> To: radio@cfai.fm, francois.gravel@
> "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "peacock.kurt"
> <peacock.kurt@
> <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, sfine <sfine@globeandmail.com>, news
> <news@kingscorecord.com>, news <news@hilltimes.com>, "Bill.Morneau"
> <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, "bill.pentney" <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>,
> jlaskin <jlaskin@torys.com>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 07:59:20 -0400
> Subject: Attn Robert Pichette Re Mindless Brad Green et al we just
> talked until you dared to make fun of my Father and pissed me off
> N'esy Pas??
> To: dauphin@nbnet.nb.ca, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, "serge.rousselle"
> <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "Ed.Doherty" <Ed.Doherty@gnb.ca>,
> "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "paul.vickery"
> <paul.vickery@justice.gc.ca>, "Paul.Harpelle" <Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca>,
> "Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "dominic.leblanc"
> <dominic.leblanc@parl.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn"
> <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <GillesLee@edmundston.ca>, jjmb@nbnet.nb.ca,
> gilles.duval@acadienouvelle.
>
> Death of Louis J. Robichaud (05/01/06)
> NB 07
>
> Jan. 6, 2005
>
> EDITOR'S NOTE: The death of Hon. Louis J. Robichaud, PC, CC, ONB, QC,
> former Senator of Canada and former Premier of New Brunswick, occurred
> today at the Hôpital Stella-Maris-de-Kent in Sainte-Anne-de-Kent.
> Details concerning the funeral service will be provided later.
>
> Persons wishing to send condolences to the family may do so at the
> following address: Mrs. Louis J. Robichaud and family, 4532 Principale
> Street, Saint-Antoine, N.B., E3V 1R2.
>
> A book of condolence will be available in the vestibule of the New
> Brunswick Legislature in Fredericton, beginning at 10 a.m. on Friday,
> Jan. 7.
>
> Those wishing to make a donation may do so to the Canadian Kidney
> Foundation.
>
> The family does not wish to give interviews.
>
> MEDIA CONTACTS: All inquiries should be addressed to Anne Reynolds,
> Protocol Office, Intergovernmental and International Relations,
> 506-453-2671, anne.reynolds@gnb.ca or Dr. Robert Pichette, Mr.
> Robichaud's former executive assistant, at 506-382-3438; cell:
> 506-381-2262; e-mail: dauphin@nbnet.nb.ca.
>
> https://www.fact.on.ca/
>
> ROBERT PICHETTE
> The Globe and Mail
> Monday, August 16, 1999
> in NEW BRUNSWICK --
> The charge is prepar'd, the lawyers are met;
> The judges all rang'd (a terrible show!).
> - John Gay, The Beggar's Opera
> In February, 1998, New Brunswick Provincial Court Judge Jocelyne
> Moreau-Bérubé displayed a shocking lack of judgment that haunts her
> still and may even ruin her life. After a particularly gruelling day
> in court, deeply concerned by the health of her mother, the judge let
> go from the bench a tirade in which she grossly defamed the entire
> Acadian population in her jurisdiction, on the north shore of New
> Brunswick.
> She bluntly stated that if a poll were taken in the area to determine
> who was honest and who was not, the dishonest citizens would win. She
> added: "People in the Acadian Peninsula have difficulty trusting those
> who live beside them or in front of them." For good measure she said
> that the citizens of the Acadian Peninsula "don't like having the
> finger pointed at them. This causes me some pain to say because I live
> in the peninsula. It's home. Look at the honest people in the Acadian
> Peninsula. They are very few and certainly very rare."
> The outcry that followed these injudicious remarks was swift and
> understandably angry. A few days later, the judge apologized
> unreservedly in open court, admitting that she had "made an enormous
> mistake" and that she had "never doubted, and absolutely [does] not
> doubt, the honesty and integrity of the people of the Acadian
> Peninsula."
> That apology could not prevent a plethora of complaints to the New
> Brunswick Judicial Council, which, in accordance with its act,
> appointed a fact-finding committee. The committee heard the
> complainants as well as the judge and her lawyers. Eventually it
> reported to the council that the remarks were derogatory, but that the
> judge had not meant them to be taken literally; that she had duly
> apologized and that, after her public ordeal, she was not likely to
> reoffend.
> Accordingly, the committee recommended to the judicial council that a
> reprimand would suffice. However, the council threw out its
> committee's report on the ground that it was not empowered to make
> recommendations. The council then proceeded to recommend Judge
> Moreau-Bérubé's dismissal by the then-Liberal government, which was
> bound in law to accept the council's recommendation.
> The summarily dismissed judge appealed the decision to the Court of
> Queen's Bench. Last month, in a tightly worded decision, a judge of
> that court ordered her reinstatement on the ground, among others, that
> she had been denied natural justice.
> Her victory was short-lived. Brad Green, the province's new Minister
> of Justice, did reinstate her, but he announced that she would not be
> assigned a caseload since the province was considering an appeal.
> Within days, the judicial council and the Justice Department joined
> forces to lodge an appeal of the court's decision.
> The provincial government went further, asking that the Court of
> Queen's Bench's decision be stayed until the appeal was heard this
> fall. And, in a wretchedly mean move, it asked that Judge
> Moreau-Bérubé not receive her salary pending the outcome of that
> appeal. The result is that the original decision has now been stayed
> by the higher court, and she is again deprived of an income.
> "Off with her head!" seems to be the rallying cry of the judicial
> council and Justice Department in their frenzied attempt to keep Ms.
> Moreau-Bérubé permanently off the bench. This unseemly rush to
> judgment is highlighted by the swift appointment last week of a
> replacement. The new judge will take up her post in the first week of
> September.
> Lawyers for the council and the government argue that Judge
> Moreau-Bérubé has become unfit to hear cases, having irretrievably
> lost her credibility as a judge. This statement is mendacious, since
> the judge discharged her judicial duties for 14 months during the
> inquiry and there were no complaints about her behaviour. She was not
> suspended during the inquiry, as the judicial council had the power to
> do. What reasonable person would now believe that she has suddenly
> become unfit?
> Admittedly, her original remarks render her unfit to sit in her former
> jurisdiction. However, in the guise of the ponderous judicial process,
> what we are witnessing is the harassment of a judge through the
> political process and public opinion. She is being punished not for
> what she said but for her general behaviour in court; since her
> appointment to the bench in 1995, she has established a reputation for
> browbeating accused, witnesses and lawyers, to say nothing of her
> irritating habit of delivering impromptu moral sermonettes. To say
> that she is not popular with the legal and judicial fraternities is an
> understatement.
> Deprived of a livelihood, the hapless judge is expected to pay her
> legal costs, and it is hard to imagine how she could take her case to
> the Supreme Court of Canada in the event that the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal finds against her.
> This has become a truly terrible show in which the punishment does not
> fit the of- fence. Surely the time has come for mercy to season
> justice.
>
> Robert Pichette is an Acadian writer and journalist in Moncton. He can
> be reached by E-mail at: dauphin@nbnet.nb.ca
> Copyright © 1999 Globe Information Services
>
>
> https://www.acadienouvelle.
>
> https://www.acadienouvelle.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Gunther Schonfeldt Gunther.Schonfeldt@crcc-ccetp.
> Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 18:52:06 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Rotten Ralphy Goodale asked Franky Boy
> McKenna to help pick the next boss of the RCMP Now that is truly funny
> EH Willy Amos and Won Kim?
> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Bonjour,
>
> I will be away from the office until September 11, 2017. If your
> matter is urgent, please contact 1-800-665-6878.
>
> Merci,
>
> Günther Schönfeldt
> Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the RCMP
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 14:51:50 -0400
> Subject: Rotten Ralphy Goodale asked Franky Boy McKenna to help pick
> the next boss of the RCMP Now that is truly funny EH Willy Amos and
> Won Kim?
> To: william.knights@justice.gc.ca, ralph.goodale@parl.gc.ca,
> Frank.McKenna@td.com, gina.scarcella@justice.gc.ca,
> mitch.taylor@justice.gc.ca, Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca,
> scott.bardsley@canada.ca, wsantos@callkleinlawyers.com, mbm@kimorr.ca,
> wjk@kimorr.ca, dklein@callkleinlawyers.com,
> Gunther.Schonfeldt@cpc-cpp.gc.
> tomengel@engellaw.ca, Charles.Rusnell@cbc.ca,
> Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca, pamela.roth@sunmedia.ca,
> dstaples@edmontonjournal.com, steve.murphy@ctv.ca,
> alison.crawford@cbc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com,
> Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca, Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-
> Lesley.McCoy@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca, stephen.thatcher@rcmp-grc.gc.
> info@pps-spp.ca, ht.lacroix@cbc.ca, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca,
> cmunroe@glgmlaw.com, premier@gnb.ca, PREMIER@gov.ns.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, william.amos@gmail.com,
> William.Amos@parl.gc.ca, jswaigen@ecojustice.ca
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>
> https://www.ecojustice.ca/
>
> John Swaigen
> Staff Lawyer
> Called to the bar: 1974 (ON)
> Ecojustice Canada Society
> PO Box 106
> 777 Bay St., Suite 1910
> Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C8
> Phone: 416-368-7533 Ext: 525
> Fax: 416-363-2746
> Email: jswaigen@ecojustice.ca
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>
> http://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/
>
> Gina M. Scarcella
> Senior Counsel
> Called to the bar: 1982 (ON)
> Justice Canada
> Public Safety & Defence Div., PO Box 36
> 3400-130 King St. W.
> Toronto, Ontario M5X 1K6
> Phone: 416-954-8111
> Fax: 416-973-5004
> Email: gina.scarcella@justice.gc.ca
>
> William A. Knights
> Deputy Director, Regulatory Law
> Called to the bar: 1977 (ON)
> Justice Canada
> Public Safety & Defence Div., PO Box 36
> 3400-130 King St. W.
> Toronto, Ontario M5X 1K6
> Phone: 416-973-8219
> Fax: 416-973-5004
> Email: william.knights@justice.gc.ca
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 13:18:56 -0400
> Subject: RE Federal Court File No T-1557-15 And Round Two between
> Dominic Cardy formerly of the NDP and The Bloc etc
> To: Martine.Ouellet.VACHON@assnat.
> Michael.Wernick@pco-bcp.gc.ca, premier@gnb.ca,
> premier.ministre@cex.gouv.qc.
> andre@jafaust.com, gopublic@cbc.ca, nmoore@bellmedia.ca,
> steve.murphy@ctv.ca, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca,
> blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, jake.stewart@gnb.ca,
> BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.com
> jody.carr@gnb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, bruce.fitch@gnb.ca,
> bruce@brucehyer.ca, leader@greenparty.ca, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca,
> David.Coon@gnb.ca, Luc.Theriault@parl.gc.ca,
> Gabriel.Ste-Marie@parl.gc.ca, Monique.Pauze@parl.gc.ca,
> Simon.Marcil@parl.gc.ca, Marilene.Gill@parl.gc.ca,
> Rheal.Fortin@parl.gc.ca, Michel.Boudrias@parl.gc.ca,
> Mario.Beaulieu@parl.gc.ca,
> Xavier.Barsalou-Duval@parl.gc.
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca,
> Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Gabriel.Ste-Marie@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 16:47:37 +0000
> Subject: Réponse automatique : Please allow me to introduce Martine
> Ouellet and Louis Plamondon to Dominic Cardy formerly the Leader of
> the NDP and now the Conservative Chief of Staff in New Brunswick
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Bonjour,
>
> Au nom du député fédéral de Joliette, nous accusons réception de votre
> courriel. Celui-ci sera porté à l'attention de Monsieur Ste-Marie et
> traité dans les plus brefs délais.
>
> Nous vous reviendrons avec une réponse dès que possible.
>
> Meilleures salutations,
>
> L'équipe du bureau de circonscription
> Gabriel Ste-Marie, député fédéral de Joliette
> Bureau de circonscription de Joliette
> 436, rue Saint-Viateur
> Joliette (Québec) J6E 3B2
> Tél. : 450 752-1940 | Téléc. : 450 752-1719
> Sans frais : 1 800 265-1940 |
> Gabriel.Ste-Marie@parl.gc.ca
>
> Ce courriel est confidentiel et ne s'adresse qu'au destinataire.
> Veuillez nous aviser s'il vous a été acheminé par erreur, merci.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Cardy, Dominic (LEG)" Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca
> Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 16:39:09 +0000
> Subject: RE: Attn Martine Ouellet and Louis Plamondon I am on the
> phone to you right now After 13 years I truly hope that somebody in
> the BLOC will act ethically listen to this recording and finally speak
> English to me
> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Lemon curry??
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 09:01:12 -0400
> Subject: Fwd: ATTN Ronald J. MacDonald RE Federal Court File No
> T-1557-15 we just talked again
> To: gdubreuil@chamber.ca, Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.
> wayne.easter@parl.gc.ca, Wayne.Long@parl.gc.ca,
> Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Guillaum (Will) Dubreuil
> Director, Public Affairs & Media Relations
> 613.238.4000 (231)
> gdubreuil@chamber.ca
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
> fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@
> Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 12:06:33 +0000
> Subject: RE: ATTN Ronald J. MacDonald RE Federal Court File No
> T-1557-15 we just talked again
> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
> comments.
>
> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
> commentaires.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 08:05:12 -0400
> Subject: Fwd: ATTN Ronald J. MacDonald RE Federal Court File No
> T-1557-15 we just talked again
> To: jeff.saunders@tsdca.com, alice.dunning@cibc.com,
> jason.patchett@cibc.com, dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> jennifer.warren@cibc.com, kristar@frederictonchamber.ca,
> Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, advocacy@frederictonchamber.ca
> briangallant10@gmail.com, brian.gallant@gnb.ca, blaine.higgs@gnb.ca,
> andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Jeff Saunders
> Tax Partner Fredericton (506) 458-8727 jeff.saunders@tsdca.com
>
> Our in-house tax geek, Jeff has over 20 years experience and the grey
> hair to prove it. He loves the challenge of working on clients’
> complex tax issues such as corporate reorganizations, succession
> planning, family trusts or planning for the purchase or sale of a
> business. When not in the office or spending time with his wife and
> daughter, you might find him rockin’ out at a concert (he recently
> checked Pearl Jam and Guns N Roses off his must see list), working the
> grill in his back yard (he insists that nothing beats charcoal) or
> sampling a beer from one of the Fredericton area’s awesome local craft
> breweries.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 11:59:18 -0400
> Subject: ATTN Ronald J. MacDonald RE Federal Court File No T-1557-15
> we just talked again
> To: ronald.j.macdonald@novascotia.
> Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, dcmurray@scclaw.ca,
> dpink@nsbs.org, dcmurray@criminaldefence.com, denis.landry2@gnb.ca
>
> Ronald J. MacDonald
> Director:
> Called to the bar: 1985 (NS); Q.C.2002 (NS)
> Nova Scotia Serious Incident Response Team
> Ste. 203, Sir John Thompson Bldg.
> 1256 Barrington St.
> Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 1Y6
> Phone: 902-424-2010
> Cell 902v718 9707
> Fax:
> Email: ronald.j.macdonald@novascotia.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 08:53:48 -0400
> Subject: Attn Michael Comeau RE Federal Court File No T-1557-15 After
> listening to you and your pal Sheriff George Oram talk on CBC about
> guns for your minions to your buddy Terry Sequin I gave you both one
> last call
> To: michael.comeau@gnb.ca, denis.landry2@gnb.ca, george.oram@gnb.ca,
> serge.rousselle@gnb.ca, blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca,
> David.Coon@gnb.ca, brian.gallant@gnb.ca, briangallant10@gmail.com,
> Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, lisa.raitt@parl.gc.ca, media-medias@gnb.ca,
> steve.murphy@ctv.ca, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
> gopublic@cbc.ca, jeff.michaelson@gnb.ca,
> peacock.kurt@telegraphjournal.
> hance.colburne@cbc.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, jsauvageau@stu.ca,
> terry.seguin@cbc.ca, david@lutz.nb.ca, david.eidt@gnb.ca,
> Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca,
> washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, mcu@justice.gc.ca
>
> You were no doubt too busy paying attention to dope and Jazz to talk to
> me and the very corrupt Sheriff is on vacation as usual Correct?
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
>
> Jean Sauvageau - Armed Courts
> Air Date: Aug 31, 2017 1:00 AM AT
>
> Information Morning - Fredericton
> Jean Sauvageau - Armed Courts
> 00:21 10:42
>
> Terry Seguin talks to a criminology professor who questions the
> Premier's decision to introduce sidearms to the court system.
>
> Jean Sauvageau
> Department of Criminology
> Assistant Professor (1999)
> Associate of Arts in Criminal Justice (Camosun College)
> Honours B.S.Sc. in Criminology (University of Ottawa)
> M.A. in Criminology (University of Ottawa)
> Ph.D. in Criminology (Université catholique de Louvain)
>
> Telephone (506) 452-0478
> Fax (506) 450-9615
> email:jsauvageau@stu.ca
>
>
> MICHAEL COMEAU
> Deputy Minister
> Justice and Public Safety
> Phone : (506) 453-2208
> Fax : (506) 453-3870
> Email : michael.comeau@gnb.ca
>
> GEORGE ORAM
> Regional Sheriff
> Saint John, Sheriff Services (Regional Office )
> Justice and Public Safety
> Phone : (506) 658-2569
> Fax : (506) 658-2126
> Email : george.oram@gnb.ca
>
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/listen/
>
> -Mike Comeau - Marijuana
>
> Mar 14, 2017
>
> Terry Seguin talks to the Chair of the province's Working Group on the
> Legalization of Cannabis about what legal marijuana will mean for New
> Brunswick.
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/player/play/
>
> Mike Comeau - Ticket Troubles
> Information Morning - Fredericton
>
> May 12, 2017
>
> Season 2017, Episode 300290175
>
> 08:50
>
> Terry Seguin talks to the chair of the Harvest Jazz and Blues festival
> about what happened to the ticket sales website.
>
>
> --------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)" Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca
> Date: Sun, 14 May 2017 18:34:10 +0000
> Subject: RE: Attn Michael Comeau Federal Court File No T-1557-15
> Please see attached file for you to review before May 24th
> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be
> assured that your email will be reviewed.
>
> If this is a media request, please forward your email to
> media-medias@gnb.ca Thank you!
>
> ******************************
>
> Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
> Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné.
>
> Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à
> media-medias@gnb.ca Merci!
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 13:58:50 -0400
> Subject: Fwd: Here ya go folks please enjoy the hearing today in
> Federal Court and the notes I read from as I argued the Queen's sneaky
> little minions who think they are above the law and the rest of us as
> well
> To: blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, bruce.northrup@gnb.ca,
> hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, BrianThomasMacdonald
> BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.com
> carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca, Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca,
> Paul.Collister@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca,
> peacock.kurt@telegraphjournal.
> sfine@globeandmail.com, newsroom@globeandmail.ca,
> nick.brown@gnb.ca, nick.moore@bellmedia.ca, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca,
> Tim.RICHARDSON@gnb.ca, randy.mckeen@gnb.ca, premier <premier@gnb.ca>,
> brian.gallant@gnb.ca, PREMIER@gov.ns.ca, <premier@gov.ab.ca>,
> brian.hodgson@assembly.ab.ca, premier@gov.bc.ca,
> suzanne.anton.mla@leg.bc.ca, serge.rousselle@gnb.ca,
> david.eidt@gnb.ca, brian@brianruhe.ca, paul@paulfromm.com,
> sunrayzulu@shaw.ca, patrick_doran1@hotmail.com, cps@calgarypolice.ca,
> theresa.may.mp@parliament.uk, themayor@calgary.ca,
> sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca
> don.marshall@edmonton.ca>, don.iveson@edmonton.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, brian@murphygroup.ca,
> david@lutz.nb.ca, michael.comeau@gnb.ca
>
> May 24th
>
> https://archive.org/details/
>
> April 3rd
>
> https://archive.org/details/
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: NATALIA OLIVEIRA JOHNSTON natalia.johnston@cbc.ca
> Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 17:13:10 -0700
> Subject: Out of office Re: Here ya go folks please enjoy the hearing
> today in Federal Court and the notes I read from as I argued the
> Queen's sneaky little minions who think they are above the law and the
> rest of us as well
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Please note that I'm on annual leave and will return on May 29.
>
> If your matter is urgent, please contact the reception line at
> 416-205-3216.
>
> --
> *Natalia Johnston*
> Legal Assistant
> to Dustin Milligan, Katarina Germani and Azim Remani
>
> Tel. (416) 205-2306
> Fax (416) 205-2723
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
> fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@
> Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 00:14:35 +000
> Subject: RE: Here ya go folks please enjoy the hearing today in
> Federal Court and the notes I read from as I argued the Queen's sneaky
> little minions who think they are above the law and the rest of us as
> well
> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
> comments.
>
> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
> commentaires.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Póstur FOR postur@for.is
> Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 00:15:21 +0000
> Subject: Re: Here ya go folks please enjoy the hearing today in
> Federal Court and the notes I read from as I argued the Queen's sneaky
> little minions who think they are above the law and the rest of us as
> well
> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received
>
> Kveðja / Best regards
> Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 14:29:53 -0400
> Subject: Attn Sheriff George Oram why have you been ignoring my
> concerns about your actions for a year and a half?
> To: Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca, marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca,
> maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca, david@lutz.nb.ca, matthew.smith@lutz.nb.ca,
> maria.powell@lutz.nb.ca, michael.bray@fosterandcompany.
> serge.rousselle@gnb.ca, david.eidt@gnb.ca, kirk.macdonald@gnb.ca,
> mrichard@lawsociety-barreau.
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, george.oram@gnb.ca,
> "jeff.michaelson" jeff.michaelson@gnb.ca
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 08:25:38 -0400
> Subject: YO Andre Richard QC and Attorney General Serge Rousselle its
> a small wonder to mean old me that CBC has no comment section for
> their recent revelation particularly after what happened in court in
> Saint John yesterday N'esy Pas David Lutz QC?
> To: serge.rousselle@gnb.ca, nbpc@gnb.ca,
> ht.lacroix@cbc.ca, dan.ciraco@cbc.ca, Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> alexandra.fortier@cbc.ca,
> marc.pichette@radio-canada.ca, Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca,
> Friday.Joe@psic-ispc.gc.ca, damianpenny@gmail.com,
> jpink@pinklarkin.com, andrew@frankmagazine.ca, andrewjdouglas
> andrewjdouglas@gmail.com, justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca, info@ndp.ca,
> info@pco-bcp.gc.ca, Michael.Wernick@pco-bcp.gc.ca,
> stephen.harper.a1@parl.gc.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca, investigations@cbc.ca,
> gopublic@cbc.ca, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca, Robert.Jones@cbc.ca,
> terry.seguin@cbc.ca, nmoore@bellmedia.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca,
> news@kingscorecord.com, newsroom@globeandmail.ca,
> news-tips@nytimes.com, news@hilltimes.com, news919@rogers.com,
> oldmaison@yahoo.com, radical@radicalpress.com, merv@northwebpress.com,
> leader@greenparty.ca, Elizabeth.May.C1@parl.gc.ca, andre@jafaust.com,
> steve.roberge@gnb.ca, rona.ambrose.A1@parl.gc.ca, iteam@cbc.ca,
> arichard@stewartmckelvey.com, bdysart@stewartmckelvey.com
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, michael.bray@gnb.ca,
> david@lutz.nb.ca, jeff.michaelson@gnb.ca, johanne.bray@gnb.ca,
> george.oram@gnb.ca, sheri.shannon@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca,
> Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca, peter.klohn@fcnb.ca, Ryan.Martin@gnb.ca,
> dominic.leblanc.c1@parl.gc.ca, premier@gnb.ca
>
> Hey
>
> Everybody and his dog knows that Judge Richard Petrie and several
> other judges in the Court of the Queen's Bench and the Provincial
> Court in New Brunswick have a rather huge conflict of interest
> because their politcal appoinments of our polical actions and over the
> past 12 years CORRECT Davey Baby Lutz? Trust that I was not surprised
> that Petrie did not want to meet me just like the lawyer Peter klon
> did not either.
>
> It was blatantly clear to me that the minions working for Stevey Boy
> Horseman New Brunswick's latest Minister of Justice in Saint john did
> not want to discuss securities fraud with me after the deputy sheriffs
> stopped me from assisting my friend against YOUR malicious actions him
> just like I did 12 years ago EH Davey Baby Lutz?
>
> However these affidavits are in the PUBLIC RECORD and a Deputy Sheriff
> in a white shirt wacthed us properly file them. Furthermore as a
> doublecheck Judge Petrie did hear my friend read his affidavit into
> the public record BEFORE you and the malicious Sgt JEFF Michaeson
> pounced on my friend and I after the hearing was over CORRECT Mr "Far
> From Ethical" Lutz?
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Michael Hutchinson MHutchinson@afn.ca
> Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 16:23:38 +0000
> Subject: RE: Attn Michael Hutchinson we just talked correct?
> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com, Carolyn Bennett
> Carolyn.Bennett@parl.gc.ca
> Cc: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Yes, we did, Mr. Amos.
> And I'm still at a loss as to your message and why you feel it is
> important to the AFN.
>
> I'm also at a loss as to why you ended our call with, "I'll see you in
> court."
> About what?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Michael
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.
> Sent: August-28-17 12:17 PM
> To: Michael Hutchinson; Carolyn Bennett
> Cc: David Amos
> Subject: Attn Michael Hutchinson we just talked correct?
>
> Michael Hutchinson
> Communications Officer
> 613-241-6789 ext. 254
> 613-299-6330 (cell)
> mhutchinson@afn.ca
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:42:03 -0400
> Subject: Attn Adam Rodgers we just talked correct?
> To: Adam@boudrotrodgers.com, lyle.howe@eastlink.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
>
> https://boudrotrodgers.com/
>
>
> Adam Rodgers was called to the Nova Scotia Bar in 2005. Prior to
> joining Boudrot Rodgers, Adam completed his articles with a major
> Atlantic Canadian law firm in Halifax, before returning to Guysborough
> to practice in his home area. Adam practices Commercial and Personal
> Injury Litigation, Municipal Law, Criminal Defense, Divorce & Family
> Law, as well as Real Estate and Corporate Commercial.
>
> Adam is active in sports, having played competitive fastpitch softball
> on a local and national level. He volunteers as President of the
> Strait Pirates Jr. B Hockey team, and is Past-President of the Strait
> Area Chamber of Commerce. Adam is a past executive member of the Board
> of Directors of the Mulgrave Road Theatre in Guysborough.
>
> Adam is the President of the Strait Area Barristers’ Society, and a
> member of the Atlantic Provinces Trial Lawyers Association (APTLA) and
> the American Association for Justice.
>
> You can follow Adam on Twitter @adamrodgersNS
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To: coi@gnb.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>
> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>
> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/
>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>
>
> The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/
>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>
> 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau?
>
>
> Vertias Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Kulik, John" john.kulik@mcinnescooper.com
> Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 17:37:49 +0000
> Subject: McInnes Cooper
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> I am General Counsel for McInnes Cooper. If you need to communicate
> with our firm, please do so through me.
>
> Thank you.
>
> John Kulik
> [McInnes Cooper]<http://www.
>
> John Kulik Q.C.
> Partner & General Counsel
> McInnes Cooper
>
> tel +1 (902) 444 8571 | fax +1 (902) 425 6350
>
> 1969 Upper Water Street
> Suite 1300
> Purdy's Wharf Tower II Halifax, NS, B3J 2V1
>
> asst Cathy Ohlhausen | +1 (902) 455 8215
>
>
>
> Notice This communication, including any attachments, is confidential
> and may be protected by solicitor/client privilege. It is intended
> only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you have
> received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by e-mail or
> telephone at McInnes Cooper's expense. Avis Les informations contenues
> dans ce courriel, y compris toute(s) pièce(s) jointe(s), sont
> confidentielles et peuvent faire l'objet d'un privilège avocat-client.
> Les informations sont dirigées au(x) destinataire(s) seulement. Si
> vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur
> par courriel ou par téléphone, aux frais de McInnes Cooper.
>
>
>
> On 8/3/17, David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.
>> ilian.html
>>
>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>>
>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>
>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>> cards?
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>> 6
>>>
>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>> United States Senate
>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>
>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>> tapes.
>>>
>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>
>>> Very truly yours,
>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 19:23:38 -0400
> Subject: Re Federal Court File No. T-1557-15 versus RCMP class action
> lawsuits etc.Well May 24th came and went and not a peep from any of
> youror your lawyers N'esy Pas?
> To: Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, scott.bardsley@canada.ca,
> wsantos@callkleinlawyers.com, mbm@kimorr.ca, wjk@kimorr.ca,
> dklein@callkleinlawyers.com, Gunther.Schonfeldt@cpc-cpp.gc.
> "Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc" <Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca
> tomengel@engellaw.ca, Charles.Rusnell@cbc.ca,
> Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca, Charmaine.Bulger@rcmp-grc.gc.
> pamela.roth@sunmedia.ca, dstaples@edmontonjournal.com,
> steve.murphy@ctv.ca, alison.crawford@cbc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
> andre@jafaust.com,
> CRAIG.DALTON@gnb.ca, Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca,
> Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-
> ian.mcphail@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca,
> stephen.thatcher@rcmp-grc.gc.
> jean-pierre.blais@crtc.gc.ca>, ht.lacroix@cbc.ca, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca,
> cmunroe@glgmlaw.com,
> premier@gnb.ca, PREMIER@gov.ns.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca, Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 14:30:06 -0400
> Subject: Re Federal Court File No. T-1557-15 versus RCMP class action
> lawsuits about the cops harassing each other Why does the CROWN deny
> that the cops have abused me as well?
> To: Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>,
> scott.bardsley@canada.ca, wsantos@callkleinlawyers.com,
> mbm@kimorr.ca, wjk@kimorr.ca, dklein@callkleinlawyers.com,
> Gunther.Schonfeldt@cpc-cpp.gc.
> tomengel@engellaw.ca, Charles.Rusnell@cbc.ca,
> Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca, Charmaine.Bulger@rcmp-grc.gc.
> pamela.roth@sunmedia.ca, dstaples@edmontonjournal.com,
> steve.murphy@ctv.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, alison.crawford@cbc.ca,
> oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com, CRAIG.DALTON@gnb.ca,
> Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca, Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-
> Lesley.McCoy@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca, ian.mcphail@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca,
> Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, stephen.thatcher@rcmp-grc.gc.
> info@pps-spp.ca
>
> Perhaps some lawyer other than Liliana Longo,
> Dominic Leblanc or you should talk to me before I file a few more
> lawsuits EH Minister Goodale and Tom Engel?
>
> Liliana Longo
> Senior General Counsel
> Called to the bar: 1980 (QC)
> Royal Canadian Mounted Police
> Legal Services
> 73 Leikin Dr.
> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2
> Phone: 613-843-4433
> Fax: 613-825-7489
>
> http://www.avenueedmonton.com/
>
> Is This the Most Hated Lawyer in Town?
> Tom Engel has laid more complaints against police officers than any
> other lawyer in the province. And police have made complaints against
> him more than 20 times.
> by Charles Rusnell
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
>
> Remand centre guard sued by law firm over drug-smuggling allegation
> Lawsuit alleges guard told criminology students that lawyers were drug
> smugglers
> By Charles Rusnell, Jennie Russell, CBC News Posted: Feb 08, 2016 12:53 PM
> MT
>
> http://www.edmontonsun.com/
>
> Edmonton lawyer Tom Engel asks for pair of city cops to be fired
> First posted: Monday, July 07, 2014 04:33 PM MDT
>
> Engel Law Office
> 200 Wentworth Bldg.
> 10209-97th St. N.W.
> Edmonton, Alberta T5J 0L6
> Phone: 780-448-3639
>
> http://www.kimorr.ca/index.
>
> RCMP Class Action
>
> January 17, 2017
> On January 13, Justice McDonald of the Federal Court released reasons
> certifying the action for settlement purposes. A copy of those reasons
> can be read here. The Federal Court has scheduled the hearing of the
> settlement approval motion for May 24, 2017 at 9:30 in Toronto. The
> Notice of Certification and Settlement approval hearing is here. The
> Notice in French is here. The opt out form is here.
>
> On October 6, 2016, an historic settlement was reached in the systemic
> harassment class actions brought against the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police by female RCMP employees. Under the proposed national
> settlement, every single living current and former female regular
> member, civilian member, and public service employee of the RCMP who
> worked within the RCMP since 1974, and who experienced gender and/or
> sexual orientation-based harassment and discrimination, will be
> eligible to claim compensation, without fear of disclosing her
> identity to the RCMP or of reprisals. The settlement is not effective
> until approved by the Federal Court. Here is our press release from
> today regarding this historic Settlement. To view the Federal Court
> claim, click here.
>
> To read more about this proposed Settlement, please go to
> rcmpclassactionsettlement.ca.
>
> On December 22, 2015, Justice Perell released reasons dismissing the
> Crown’s motion to strike the statement of claim and confirming that
> the pleading meets the s. 5(1)(a) cause of action criterion for
> certification. To read a copy of the decision, please click here. The
> balance of the certification motion, which was scheduled to be heard
> May 26-27, 2016, has been adjourned.
>
> Kim Orr Barristers is prosecuting a class action against the Attorney
> General of Canada involving allegations of gender- and
> sexual-orientation-based discrimination, bullying and harassment of
> female Royal Canadian Mounted Police (the "RCMP") employees. The
> action has been commenced in Ontario on behalf of all current or
> former female regular members, civilian members and public service
> employees of the RCMP in Canada, excluding persons resident in Quebec.
>
> The claim alleges that men and women were, and are, treated
> differently within the RCMP, and that female RCMP employees have been
> subject to systemic discrimination, bullying and harassment on the
> basis of their gender and/or sexual orientation. It also alleges that
> the RCMP has failed to investigate, adjudicate and resolve conduct and
> complaints about these issues, despite repeated reports over the years
> about the problems within the organization.
>
> The plaintiff is a former senior-level RCMP member who alleges that
> she suffered discrimination, bullying and harassment throughout her
> 26-year RCMP career. The plaintiff alleges that as a result of this
> treatment, she, as well as the other class members, suffered serious
> injuries physical and emotional injuries, including post-traumatic
> stress disorder, diminished self-worth, depression, and anxiety. The
> claim also alleges that as a result of these systemic issues, female
> RCMP employees have been denied training and promotions, and have even
> taken early retirement or have left the organization.
>
> The action seeks general, punitive and special damages for the
> defendant's alleged failure to fulfill its statutory, common law and
> contractual duties to provide female RCMP employees with a work
> environment free of gender- and sexual-orientation-based
> discrimination, bullying and harassment. The action also seeks damages
> on behalf of family members of female RCMP employees who are entitled
> to assert a claim under provincial legislation.
>
> For more information on this case, please contact Megan B. McPhee at
> mbm@kimorr.ca.
>
> © 2017, Kim Orr Barristers P.C.
> Suite 400, 19 Mercer Street Toronto, Ontario M5V 1H2 T 416.596.1414 F
> 416.598.0601
> info@kimorr.ca Copyright Information & Disclaimer Privacy Policy
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/
>
> RCMP to face new class-action harassment lawsuit, this time on behalf
> of male employees
> Current and former members allege they were physically intimidated,
> denied promotions, belittled and bullied
> By Alison Crawford, CBC News Posted: Oct 25, 2016 8:35 PM ET
>
> The RCMP will soon face another class-action harassment lawsuit — this
> time on behalf of male Mounties and civilian employees of the force.
>
> Earlier this month, the federal government and the RCMP set aside $100
> million to settle an estimated 1,000 cases of female employees being
> harassed and bullied at work.
>
> CBC News has learned that one of the law firms that represented those
> women is preparing to bring another suit for men — which could
> potentially be much bigger given that men make up roughly 80 per cent
> of the RCMP's workforce.
>
> Mounties offer apology and $100M compensation for harassment,
> abuse against female members
> 'This is a way for everybody to heal': ex-Mountie on RCMP compensation
> External body needed to probe workplace complaints, senior Mountie says
>
> "We've spoken with hundreds of members, and we're contacted by new
> members every day," said lawyer Megan McPhee of Kim Orr Barristers in
> Toronto, who has been working on the case for years. "The stories are
> very consistent. We're told that there is a culture of bullying and
> harassment within the force, and one of the regular issues that we
> hear is a fear of speaking out, a fear of reprisals."
>
> Cpl. Michael Mansoor, who's due to be medically discharged in January,
> says he was diagnosed with PTSD after what he alleges was years of
> harassment at the hands of his colleagues and superiors.
>
> He says it started in 2001, when he was posted to his hometown of
> Richmond, B.C., where his brother was in conflict with the law. It
> wasn't long before Mansoor said he found his duties restricted.
>
> "I was banned from any work section in the detachment except for
> general duty and traffic because they acknowledged that there might be
> a conflict," said Mansoor.
> Wrongly accused of sexual assault
>
> Despite pleas for a transfer, he says his superiors stuck to the local
> convention that a member must serve five years in the detachment
> before being moved.
>
> Documents obtained under the Access to Information Act suggest
> officers were suspicious of his family ties. Eventually, Mansoor found
> himself suspended with pay and under investigation for what he alleges
> are two trumped-up internal disciplinary charges.
>
> Furthermore, due to a clerical error, Mansoor was also initially
> accused of sexual assault.
>
> "There was a minor glitch with [Mansoor's] security suspension
> document service this morning," reads an internal email about
> Mansoor's disciplinary charges. "There is a reference to a 'sexual
> assault'.... It was our conclusion that HQ Ottawa had screwed up the
> paperwork. Seems likely that they took a previous form letter,
> re-tooled it for [Mansoor's] case and did not remove a phrase that did
> not apply in this case."
>
> As for the two other allegations, they later proved unfounded.
>
> Whisper campaign
>
> Over time, Mansoor says the ongoing whisper campaign and harassment
> made him ill.
>
> "There comes actually a point where you start to look at yourself and
> go, 'Am I bringing this on myself? Because surely it's not this
> widespread in an organization,'" Mansoor said.
>
> Retired sergeant Hugo Desrochers says he knows exactly how that feels.
>
> Retired Sgt. Hugo Desrochers
>
> Retired sergeant Hugo Desrochers alleges that during his employment
> with the RCMP he was stripped of responsibility, belittled in front of
> colleagues and denied opportunities to develop his career. (Provided
> by Desrochers)
>
> He left the force last year after 26 years in a job he says, for the
> most part, he loved. He was making his way up the ranks and working
> towards another promotion, he says, but that came to a halt near the
> end of his career when management changed at the RCMP detachment in
> Cornwall, Ont.
>
> "[I] started covering my back. Started taking notes to make sure I was
> not going to be hung out to dry," Desrochers said.
>
> Years of meticulous notes document allegations of being micromanaged,
> stripped of his responsibilities, belittled in front of colleagues for
> taking initiative and denied opportunities to further develop his
> career.
>
> The worst incident, according to Desrochers, was when the inspector
> refused to sign off on his application to serve in Kosovo due to
> shortcomings with his performance. Yet Desrochers says all his boss
> managed to come up with, after repeated requests for specifics, was a
> late overtime claim.
>
> Retired Sgt. Hugo Desrochers
>
> Desrochers, right, seen here on a marijuana bust in British Columbia
> early in his career. (Provided by Desrochers)
>
> "It takes a toll on you because you start questioning yourself...and
> then you're not good," an emotional Desrochers told CBC News.
>
> Desrochers welcomes the lawsuit.
>
> "If nobody comes forward to say there's a problem, how are they going
> to know there's a problem. Is it just me sitting here? No."
>
> Belittled, physically intimidated
>
> It's not just men in uniform who allege they've been harassed.
>
> Garth Caron worked as a public servant from 2005 to 2015, doing
> administrative work in detachments in Saskatchewan and Alberta. Caron
> says his first experience with harassment was when a few Mounties took
> issue with him being gay and subjected him to a number of pranks.
>
> "I came in one morning to my workstation and I noticed a number of
> female items on my desk — boxes of tampons and things like that — and
> it kind of struck me as odd as to why they would have been left
> there," he said.
>
> At another detachment, Caron said a sergeant questioned his Métis
> status, belittled him in front of colleagues and tried to physically
> intimidate him. The union got involved and Caron says he agreed, while
> under a great deal of duress, to retire before he was ready to leave
> the workforce.
>
> It's no secret the RCMP has a bullying problem. Commissioner Bob
> Paulson has said so himself. In a 2012 interview with CBC News,
> Paulson conceded that he too had been harassed at work.
>
> "I think in the day, if you weren't sort of in line with your
> officer's expectations or consistent with his or her vision of where
> the organization was going, then you were pushed aside," he said. "And
> it's a very uncomfortable feeling and a very destructive feeling, and
> it doesn't speak to a transparent, ethical, organization."
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 12:46:00 -0400
> Subject: A little Deja Vu for old pals of Kevin Vickers on the Hill to
> review before their party hardy as Canada turns the corner on 150
> tonight
> To: heather.bradley@parl.gc.ca, Jean-Bruno.Tremblay@sen.parl.
> Mike.McDonald@sen.parl.gc.ca, patrick.mcdonell@parl.gc.ca,
> ppscommsspp@pps-spp.parl.gc.ca
> Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, christian.bourgeois@parl.gc.ca
> denis.morin@parl.gc.ca, claude.st-germain@parl.gc.ca,
> gilles.gervais@parl.gc.ca, geoff@geoffregan.ca,
> Carol.Hughes@parl.gc.ca, bruce.stanton@parl.gc.ca, SpkrOff@parl.gc.ca,
> geoff.regan@parl.gc.ca, geoff.regan.a1@parl.gc.ca,
> john.wallace@sen.parl.gc.ca, rona.ambrose.A1@parl.gc.ca,
> david.mcguinty@parl.gc.ca, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, garry.keller@parl.gc.ca, "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, "Peter.Edge" <Peter.Edge@ice.dhs.gov>,
> postur <postur@for.is>, "Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc"
> <Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca
> cmunroe@glgmlaw.com, Matt.DeCourcey.c1@parl.gc.ca, DJT
> <DJT@trumporg.com>, "Alaina.Lockhart" <Alaina.Lockhart@parl.gc.ca>,
> andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, pmilliken@cswan.com, mcohen
> <mcohen@trumporg.com>, dmcgahn <dmcgahn@jonesday.com>, oig
> <oig@sec.gov>, oig <oig@ftc.gov>, OIG <OIG@cap-police.senate.gov>,
> "James.Comey" <James.Comey@ic.fbi.gov>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
> <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>
> They only time Vickers ever responded to me since 2004 was when his
> computer acted ethically just Harper was preparing to ship him over to
> Ireland a get him out of the way as he handed security over to the
> RCMP.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: kevin.vickers@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 17:43:20 -0500
> Subject: Out of Office: Here is a little more Deja Vu for the CIBC,
> the RCMP, the CBC etc and the lawyers/MLAs Jim Prentice QC PC Jonathan
> Denis QC, Don.Scott QC and their newfound EX Wildrose pals
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Please be advised that the Sergeant-at-Arms is currently away from the
> office and will be returning on Monday, November 17, 2014.
>
> If this is a business enquiry, please contact:
>
> Benoit Giroux, Acting Sergeant-at-Arms:
> Telephone: 613-995-1990| E-mail:
> Benoit.Giroux@parl.gc.ca<
>
> If this is a media enquiry, please contact:
>
> Heather Bradley
> Director of Communications, Office of the Speaker of the House of Commons
> Telephone: 613-995-7882 | E-mail:
> heather.bradley@parl.gc.ca<
>
> Please expect a delay in receiving a response to personal
> correspondence due to current volume.
>
> Thank you.
>
> ******************************
>
> Veuillez noter que le sergent d’armes est absent du bureau et sera de
> retour le lundi 17 novembre 2014.
>
> S’il s’agit d’une demande liée aux opérations, veuillez communiquer avec :
> Benoit Giroux, sergent d'armes par intérim
> Téléphone : 613-995-1990| Courriel :
> Benoit.Giroux@parl.gc.ca<
>
> S’il s’agit d’une demande de renseignements des médias, veuillez
> communiquer avec :
>
> Heather Bradley
> Directrice des communications, Bureau du Président de la Chambre des
> communes
> Téléphone : 613-995-7882 | Courriel :
> heather.bradley@parl.gc.ca<
>
> En ce qui a trait aux réponses à la correspondance personnelle, vous
> devez vous attendre à un retard en raison du volume actuel.
>
> Merci.
>
>
> https://www.hilltimes.com/
>
> ‘If Kevin Vickers were here, he would not let this happen’: May
>
> The Hill Times
> By Tim Naumetz
> PUBLISHED : Friday, Feb. 6, 2015 1:19 AM
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>
> Sunday, 19 February 2017
> YO CST DALE DRUMMOND Do you or any the CROWN's lawyers recall the
> document hereto attached (Paragraph19 in particular) ?
> This is the text of the document
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>
> Sunday, 6 December 2015
> Federal Court File No. T-1557-15 Opposition to Motion to Dismiss
>
> Here is the proof of all that was filed
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 07:32:10 -0400
> Subject: YO CST DALE DRUMMOND Do you or any the CROWN's lawyers recall
> the document hereto attached (Paragraph19 in particular) ?
> To: Dale DRUMMOND <dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> "Gerald.Butts" <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "CRAIG.DALTON"
> <CRAIG.DALTON@gnb.ca>, Craig Munroe <cmunroe@glgmlaw.com>,
> "bob.paulson" <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Dale.Morgan"
> <Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "brian.hodgson"
> <brian.hodgson@assembly.ab.ca>
> <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "scott.bardsley"
> <scott.bardsley@canada.ca>, "tim.turner" <tim.turner@gov.ab.ca>, Ezra
> <Ezra@therebel.media>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, oldmaison
> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "Gilles.Moreau" <Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>,
> "Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, postur <postur@for.is>,
> briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <radical@radicalpress.com>, akemp <akemp@andrewkemp.ca>,
> "Gilles.Blinn" <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen"
> <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "jill.chisholm"
> <jill.chisholm@justice.gc.ca>, "david.hansen"
> <david.hansen@justice.gc.ca>, "bill.pentney"
> <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 08:00:47 -0400
> Subject: Re Federal Court File No. T-1557-15 and the QMPMA application
> for a class action lawsuit against the RCMP byway of the CROWN
> To: assoc.mpmq@gmail.com, fsimedia@videotron.ca,
> charles.mancer@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, james@dugganavocats.ca,
> Serge.Bilodeau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn"
> <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "dale.drummond"
> <dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> <bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.
> <Paulette.Delaney-Smith@rcmp-
> <Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>
> Perhaps we should talk ASAP?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> https://ampmq.ca/class-action-
>
> https://mancer.
>
> The Application for certification of a class action on behalf of all
> members of the RCMP (past and present) arose from the many members
> coming forward with their long-standing stories of harassment, abuse
> and discrimination experienced while working in the RCMP. These are
> stories that span many decades and point to a culture of bullying,
> harassment and discrimination in the RCMP.
>
> https://mancer.
>
> https://ampmq.ca/en/
>
> President Serge Bilodeau
> Vice-President Charles Mancer
> Quebec Mounted Police Members’ Association (QMPMA)
> Post Office Box 154
> Westmount, Quebec, Canada
> H3Z 2T2
> Phone: (450) 291-4458
> assoc.mpmq@gmail.com
>
> 1699 Rue Principale,
> Saint-Blaise-sur-Richelieu,
> Quebec, J0J 1W0
>
> Media relations
>
> Frederic Serre
> Media relations officer
> Phone: (438) 875-4217
> fsimedia@videotron.ca
>
>
> http://www.dugganavocats.ca/
> James Duggan:
> Windsor Station
> 1100 Avenue des Canadiens-de-Montreal (West)
> Suite 900
> Montreal, QC, Canada, H3B 2S2
> Phone: (514) 879-1459
> Fax: (514) 879-5648
> Email james@dugganavocats.ca
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Lisa Porteous <lporteous@kleinlyons.com>
> Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 14:46:22 +0000
> Subject: RCMP
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> David,
>
> Thank you for your email inquiring about our class action against the
> RCMP. As you may know, the Notice of Claim was filed in the British
> Columbia Supreme Court on March 27, 2012. The lawsuit has been
> brought by former RCMP constable Janet Merlo on behalf of female RCMP
> members. Unfortunately, we cannot assist you with your claim.
>
> We recommend that you contact Mr. Barry Carter of Mair Jensen Blair
> LLP to discuss any claim you may have against the RCMP for harassment.
> His contact information is as follows:
>
> Mr. Barry Carter
> Mair Jensen Blair LLP
> 1380-885 W. Georgia Street
> Vancouver, BC V6C 3E8
> Phone: 604-682-6299
> Fax 1-604-374-6992
>
> This is not intended to be an opinion concerning the merits of your
> case. In declining to represent you, we are not expressing an opinion
> as to whether you should take further action in this matter.
>
> You should be aware that there may be strict time limitations within
> which you must act in order to protect your rights. Failure to begin
> your lawsuit by filing an action within the required time may mean
> that you could be barred forever from pursuing a claim. Therefore, you
> should immediately contact another lawyer ( as indicated above) to
> obtain legal advice/representation.
>
> Thank you again for considering our firm.
>
> Yours truly,
>
> Lisa Porteous
> Case Manager/Paralegal
>
> lporteous@kleinlyons.com
> www.kleinlyons.com
>
> KLEIN ∙ LYONS
> Suite 400-1385 West 8th Avenue
> Vancouver BC V6H 3V9 Canada
> Office 604.874.7171
> Fax 604.874.7180
> Direct 604.714.6533
>
> This email is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client
> privilege. It is intended only for the use of the person to whom it is
> addressed. Any distribution, copying or other use by anyone else is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
> telephone us immediately and destroy this e-mail.
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:08:00 -0400
> Subject: I repeat You never got back to me Mr Spratt WHY?
> To: michael@agpllp.ca, "bob.paulson" <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <alison.crawford@cbc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
> "Jody.Wilson-Raybould.a1" <Jody.Wilson-Raybould.a1@parl.
>
> Michael Spratt
> Criminal Defence Counsel
> 116 Lisgar St Ottawa, On K2P 0C2
> 613) 296-2561
> michael@agpllp.ca
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/
>
> Liberals looking to eliminate many mandatory minimum sentences,
> justice minister says
> Wilson-Raybould says mandatory minimums contribute to backlogs in
> Canada's courts
> By Alison Crawford, CBC News Posted: Feb 11, 2017 5:00 AM ET
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 10:37:51 -0400
> Subject: Fwd Even though the Premiers and Attorney Generals of ONT,
> QC, MA, SK, PEI, NS, BC and AB refuse to answer the documents I sent
> in 2005 and many wackos on the Internet deny that my lawsuit exists it
> does not follow that I am a liar
> To: postur <postur@for.is>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 10:36:19 -0400
> Subject: Even though the Premiers and Attorney Generals of ONT, QC,
> MA, SK, PEI, NS, BC and AB refuse to answer the documents I sent in
> 2005 and many wackos on the Internet deny that my lawsuit exists it
> does not follow that I am a liar
> To: ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, premier
> <premier@gov.ab.ca>, "suzanne.anton.mla"
> <suzanne.anton.mla@leg.bc.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>,
> vicki.huntington.MLA@leg.bc.ca
> bill.bennett.MLA@leg.bc.ca, themayor <themayor@calgary.ca>, cps
> <cps@calgarypolice.ca>, "don.iveson" <don.iveson@edmonton.ca>, eps
> <eps@edmontonpolice.ca>, radical <radical@radicalpress.com>, Brian
> Ruhe <brian@brianruhe.ca>, sunrayzulu <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>,
> patrick_doran1 <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>,
> andrew.weaver.mla@leg.bc.ca, adrian.dix.MLA@leg.bc.ca,
> eliasishak@yandex.com, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, smcintyre
> <smcintyre@sylvanlake.ca>, Dean Ray <deanrogerray@hotmail.com>,
> "Gilles.Blinn" <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Dale.Morgan"
> <Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, corporate.security@calgary.ca,
> "don.marshall" <don.marshall@edmonton.ca>, "Paul.Lynch"
> <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
> <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, "David.Coon"
> <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, david <david@lutz.nb.ca>, "david.eidt"
> <david.eidt@gnb.ca>, info@greenparty.bc.ca, premier <premier@gnb.ca>,
> PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 16:26:22 -0400
> Subject: Perhaps you purportedly ethical Overseers of the Financial
> Industry should ask yourselves a very simple question
> To: ombuds@finra.org, "Andrew.Bailey" <Andrew.Bailey@fca.org.uk>,
> "dean.buzza" <dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, oig <oig@sec.gov>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> Where is the transcript and webcast?
>
> http://www.banking.senate.gov/
>
> U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs
> 534 Dirksen Senate Office Building
> Washington, D.C. 20510
>
> Phone: (202) 224-7391
> Fax: (202) 224-5137
>
> Mike Crapo Chairman
> Washington Office
> 239 Dirksen Senate Office Building
> Washington, DC 20510
> Phone: (202) 224-6142
> Fax: (202) 228-1375
>
> Anyone recall the stuff this old blog of an NDP supporter?
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>
> Have you seen the work Patrick Doran of Calgary in Encycopedia
> Dramtica or YouTube?
>
> https://encyclopediadramatica.
>
> How about his buddy Barry Winters many very evil blogs
>
> http://eateshite.blogspot.ca/
>
> How about some of the many computer responses to emails over the years?
>
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 11:41 AM, PREM Premier Premier@gov.ab.ca wrote:
>
> Please be advised that the Premier's e-mail address is intended to
> provide Albertans with a venue to share their comments on various
> government issues. Therefore, it is requested that the Premier's e-mail
> address be removed from your mailing list at the earliest opportunity.
>
> Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Graff, Elisabeth JAG:EX" <Elisabeth.Graff@gov.bc.ca>
> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 12:18:24 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: A little year old Deja Vu for Chucky
> Leblancand all his old buddies in the Fake Left, the Greeen Meanies,
> RCMP. the Fredericton and Miramichi Police Forces to review one year
> later
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I am away from the office until Tuesday, November 17, 2015. Please
> contact Sarah Gibbs at 250 356-8835, Sacha Williamson at 250 356-8826,
> or Carrol Parfitt at 250 356-8831 if you require any immediate
> assistance.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Elisabeth
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Eby.MLA, David" <David.Eby.MLA@leg.bc.ca>
> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 20:09:08 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Justice Camp the Canadian Judicial
> Council and Kathleen Ganley I just called Ganley's Ministry office and
> her assistant hung up me Go Figure EH Ezzy Baby Levant and Premier
> Notely?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for contacting my Community Office.
>
> This automated response is to assure you that your message has been
> received by my office and will be reviewed as soon as possible, noting
> that constituents of Vancouver-Point Grey have priority. Please be
> sure to respond back and include your home address or postal code if
> you haven't already, to confirm you are a resident of Vancouver-Point
> Grey.
>
> Due to the high volume of correspondence received, I am not be able to
> respond personally to every inquiry. In most cases, anonymous, cc'd,
> and forwarded items will not receive a response. Please do not
> hesitate to contact my office should you have any questions regarding
> the status of your query.
>
> Should you have a situation that requires immediate attention, please
> call Service BC, toll-free at 1-800-663-7867<callto:1-800-
> and they will connect you to the appropriate government ministry.
>
> To find out which MLA represents your neighbourhood, you can enter
> your postal code here to get their contact information:
> https://www.leg.bc.ca/learn-
>
> Thanks again for writing,
> Community office of David Eby MLA, Vancouver-Point Grey
> 2909 West Broadway, Vancouver BC V6K 2G6
> 604-660-1297 | www.davidebymla.ca
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jonathan Denis QC <Jonathan.Denis@gov.ab.ca>
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:35:30 +0000
> Subject: Re: Well Mr Baconfat lets see if Patty Baby allows this
> comment on your LIVE talk show stand the test of time EH PERVERTS?
> To: Shawn Cullen <shawncullen@telus.net>
> Cc: Don Iveson <don.iveson@edmonton.ca>, David Amos
> <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, sunrayzulu <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>,
> patrick_doran1 <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>,
> "dale.johnson@edmontonpolice.
> <rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>
> <geoff.crowe@edmontonpolice.ca
> <greg.preston@edmontonpolice.
> <scott.mckeen@edmonton.ca>, "dave.loken" <dave.loken@edmonton.ca>,
> "danny.copp" <danny.copp@fredericton.ca>, lgunter <lgunter@shaw.ca>,
> "Leanne.Fitch" <Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>, oldmaison
> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, "martin.gaudet"
> <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
> <Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca>, eachtem <eachtem@hotmail.com>, deanr0032
> <deanr0032@hotmail.com>, "dean.buzza" <dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> Rhansen <Rhansen@calgarypolice.ca>, Glen Canning
> <grcanning@gmail.com>, "scott.macrae" <scott.macrae@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> bourdap <bourdap@halifax.ca>, pol7163 <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>,
> "bill.clark" <bill.clark@edmontonpolice.ca>
> <eps@edmontonpolice.ca>, police <police@fredericton.ca>, DDrummond
> <DDrummond@google.com>, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> Please also remove
> jonathan.denis@gov.ab.ca<
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Johnston, Jennifer JAG:EX" <Jennifer.Johnston@gov.bc.ca>
> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 18:03:35 -0700
> Subject: Out of Office: Christy Clark and Stockwell Day dig up old
> blog comments about Indians to embarass Dix and Topp? Trust that that
> statemnt was a minor the tip of a very malevolent Iceberg for BOTH
> parities
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I am away until April 23, 2013. I will not be checking my e-mails.
> If this is urgent, please call Kathy Backer at 250 992-4262.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Premier <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>
> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 02:12:15 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: [PROBABLE-SPAM] RE The corrupt RCMP their
> pal Senator Kenny, the evil Public Safety dudes and Old Email
> Exchanges that even the CBC CLEARLY FORGOT
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> On behalf of Premier Stephen McNeil, thank you for your email.
>
> Given the volume of emails and letters received a response, if
> required, may take several business days.
>
> If your email relates to a meeting request or an invitation to an
> event, you will hear from the Premier's scheduling committee regarding
> your request.
>
> Premier McNeil appreciates you taking the time to write and values your
> input.
>
> Warmest Regards,
>
> Premier's Correspondence Unit
>
>
>> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> >> From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
>> >> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:05:47 +0000
>> >> Subject: Re: Hey Premier Gallant please inform the questionable
>> >> parliamentarian Birigtta Jonsdottir that although NB is a small "Have
>> >> Not" province at least we have twice the population of Iceland and
>> >> that not all of us are as dumb as she and her Prime Minister pretends
>> >> to be..
>> >> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received
>> >>
>> >> Kveðja / Best regards
>> >> Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> This is the docket
>> >>
>> >>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>> >>
>> >> These are digital recordings of the last two hearings
>> >>
>> >> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>> >>
>> >> Jan 11th https://archive.org/details/
>> >>
>> >> This me running for a seat in Parliament again while CBC denies it
>> >> again
>> >>
>> >> Fundy Royal, New Brunswick Debate – Federal Elections 2015 - The Local
>> >> Campaign, Rogers TV
>> >>
>> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>> >>
>> >>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
>> >>
>> >> Veritas Vincit
>> >> David Raymond Amos
>> >> 902 800 0369
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>> dudes are way past too late
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>>
>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Merci ,
>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>
>>
>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>
>> January 13, 2015
>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>
>> December 8, 2014
>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>
>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>
>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>
>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>> campaign of 2006.
>>
>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>
>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>
>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>
>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>> essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An
>> ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear
>> and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,”
>> or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of
>> terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states
>> “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of
>> Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an
>> ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the
>> Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
>>
>> One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty
>> was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the
>> amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time
>> denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time
>> self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of
>> “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the
>> G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious
>> behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister
>> Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully
>> cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits
>> are not.
>>
>> Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal
>> mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the
>> world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy”
>> David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security
>> and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can
>> and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing
>> “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war
>> criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending
>> tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
>>
>> In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
>> “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
>> successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing,
>> marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian
>> military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern
>> equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are
>> antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five
>> years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that
>> won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
>>
>> My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
>> Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin
>> Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not
>> served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social
>> democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and
>> other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet
>> these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to
>> other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
>>
>> Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security,
>> and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before
>> shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
>>
>> Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now
>>
>> From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
>> Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and
>> the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still
>> alive
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
>> your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply
>> to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
>>
>> >>>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
>> Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the
>> War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
>> To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil,
>> Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.
>> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca,
>> milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca,
>> sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari
>> <smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
>> susan@blueskystrategygroup.com
>> eugene@blueskystrategygroup.
>> Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice" <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin"
>> <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower
>> <whistleblower@ctv.ca>
>>
>> I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David
>> Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's
>> Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on
>> CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To
>> be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested
>> that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise
>> if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else
>> about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact that your
>> old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English
>> never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is
>> interesting though
>>
>> http://www.
>>
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/
>>
>> Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
>> this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
>> Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad
>> Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
>>
>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/
>>
>> The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a
>> shy political animal
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>> Enjoy Mr Weston
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/
>>
>> "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
>> brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
>> says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
>> to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
>> including a Canadian general.
>>
>> That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
>> who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
>> U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was
>> also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
>> prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
>>
>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.
>>
>> "I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
>> being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
>> demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
>> "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
>> into the US policy.
>>
>> At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
>> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
>> in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
>> report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was
>> never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
>> were deployed WMD.
>>
>> Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
>> invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
>> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
>> (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
>> about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
>> that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
>> authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
>>
>> There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
>> its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
>> to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
>> folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
>> upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions
>> are to met before US troop can redeploy? Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of
>> Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them
>> correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the
>> George W Bush administration was onerous
>>
>> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
>> military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
>> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
>> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
>> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
>> operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
>> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
>> ....not necessarily in that order. "
>>
>> You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
>> Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
>>
>> http://www.socom.mil/
>>
>>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment