Sunday, 6 November 2022

Things got CrAzY as Rod Giltaca spoke to the Public Safety Committee on Bill C-21

 
 

PM Trudeau on NDP-Liberal deal, MPs on firearms, Safe Third Country Agreement – December 14, 2022

MPs speak with reporters on Parliament Hill as they convene for the daily question period in the House of Commons. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau faces questions from reporters regarding his party's confidence-and-supply agreement with the NDP. He is also asked about the Canada-U.S. Safe Third Country Agreement and Trade Minister Mary Ng's violation of the Conflict of Interest Act. Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino, Rural Economic Development Minister Gudie Hutchings, and NPD public safety critic Alistair MacGregor discuss concerns with the proposed Liberal amendment to Bill C-21, the government's firearms legislation. Bloc Québécois immigration critic Alexis Brunelle-Duceppe responds to questions about the reported amendments that have been reached with the United States to modernize the Safe Third Country Agreement.
 
 
 
 

Conservative MPs reiterate concerns with Liberal amendment to firearms bill – December 14, 2022

Conservative MPs Raquel Dancho, the party's public safety critic, and Pierre Paul-Hus, Quebec political lieutenant, hold a news conference on Parliament Hill as the end of the fall sitting approaches.
 
 
 
 
 

PrimeTime Politics: Premiers continue health care pressure - December 9, 2022

New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs joins Michael Serapio for questions on the continuing provincial demand for more federal health transfers. Assembly of First Nations National Chief RoseAnne Archibald discusses this week's Special Chiefs Assembly. And journalists Catherine Lévesque (National Post) and Marsha McLeod (The Globe and Mail) review the week's top political developments.
 
 
 
 

Every MP Against C-21 (Friday December 9, 2022)

56K subscribers
Here are all the MPs who raised their voices and spoke out on behalf of their constituents against Bill C-21. Let them stand up and be counted.  
TOO FUNNY The LIEbranos have to rely on the Bloc for support for C-21 now that their NDP buddies are running scared 
 
 

Some guns used for hunting may still fall under firearms ban, Liberal MP says

Taleeb Noormohamed says SKS rifle used by both legitimate hunters and criminals

Liberal MP Taleeb Noormohamed says the federal government's controversial firearms legislation is not trying to target hunters and farmers — but some guns commonly used by them may still be banned.

Noormohamed, who sits on the parliamentary committee now grappling with the bill, acknowledged that firearms like the SKS rifle — which is on the list of proposed prohibitions — are sometimes used by hunters. But specific variants of the SKS have also been used to commit acts of violence, he said.

"The SKS has been used to kill cops across this country," he said in an interview on CBC Radio's The House airing Saturday. "It is used in some context by hunters, but it's also, unfortunately, in the hands of criminals."

The British Columbia MP told host Catherine Cullen that SKS variants have been used in killings across Canada — including in his own province — and have been used to murder two police officers in Ontario.

LISTEN | Liberals face criticism over gun legislation amendment:
 
Shooting range owner James Bachynsky talks about why he’s so concerned about the government’s proposed firearms legislation, and Liberal MP and member of the public safety committee Taleeb Noormohamed defends his party’s legislation.

Asked to explain how the Liberals could claim the bill did not target hunters when it bans firearms like the SKS and some Remington 742 guns, Noormohamed said that "in some cases, unfortunately, both things can be true."

Some Remington models, he said, were designed to use magazines larger than those allowed by the proposed law.

"The overwhelming majority of Canadians have said to us we need to get some of these guns off our streets, and this is where we have to figure out exactly how to thread the needle on this in a meaningful, thoughtful way," he said.

Noormohamed also echoed a willingness expressed by others in the government to adjust a proposed amendment to the bill that triggered an intense outcry.

"If there are guns on this list that shouldn't be there, for all of the reasons that folks have identified that are reasonable, then we need to work on fixing that," he said. 

He said the government is looking to "make sure that we allay any concerns that are out there, but more importantly, that we tweak the list, that we ensure this is not done in a way that does not capture commonly used hunting rifles and shotguns."

Conservatives, Indigenous group among opponents

Bill C-21 was proposed originally as legislation to ban handguns in Canada, but an amendment introduced by the government last month added language that would create an "evergreen definition" of "assault-style" firearms banned by Ottawa.

That definition includes two measures put forward by the government through regulations in 2020: a limit on muzzle energy and bore diameter, and a new rule banning semi-automatic rifles or shotguns designed to accept a detachable magazine with a capacity greater than five cartridges.

The government also introduced a list that included thousands of models that were covered by the ban — many of them firearms frequently used for hunting or sport shooting.

WATCH | Conservatives, NDP push back on government gun legislation: 

Opposition MPs discuss Bill C-21

Duration 8:22
Conservative public safety critic Raquel Dancho and NDP House Leader Peter Julian joined Power & Politics Monday to debate the controversial amendment to Bill C-21.

The federal government has faced intense criticism over the new amendment. Conservative critic Raquel Dancho has called the move a historic "attack on the culture of hunting." The Assembly of First Nations passed an emergency resolution at its conference in Ottawa condemning the amendment.

Among those leading the charge against the legislation are gun owners and those involved in the industry, including James Bachynsky, co-owner of the Calgary Shooting Centre.

Bachynsky told The House he felt targeted by the Liberals' "consistent attacks" on his "livelihood" through firearms legislation.

"I don't think anyone in the current government really cares, and I don't think they plan on doing anything other than offer platitudes," said Bachynsky, who served in the Canadian military for two decades.

He took issue with the criteria the government is putting forward and argued the changes would do little to make Canadians safer.

"They're piggybacking the problem with increased gun crime in big cities in Canada — and there's no denying that it's happening — but they're piggybacking private gun ownership on that problem," he said. "And they're attacking people who have nothing to do with that."

Bachynsky holds a First World War Ross rifle at his Calgary gun store and range. (Alex Zabjek/CBC)

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said this week that the government is now re-examining the legislation.

"The definition is something that we are very much committed to, but the actual list that goes with it, that's something that we're consulting on right now," he said.

Noormohamed said that, with few sitting days remaining before the winter break, the committee studying the bill won't wrap up its activities until the new year.

"It is important that we move quickly, but it is important that we do it in a thoughtful way and that we ensure that we don't try to rush," he said.

Yukon Liberal MP says he would not vote for bill

Critics across the country continued to attack the amendment this week. Northwest Territories Premier Caroline Cochrane said on Friday she doesn't support the bill as it stands, given the impact it might have on constituents who rely on hunting for food.

"At this point, if they didn't look at the need for hunters, I could not support it, because then I would be supporting people starving," she said.

Liberal MP Brendan Hanley, who represents Yukon, said he won't vote for the bill if concerns about the amendment are not addressed.

LISTEN | Gun control advocate reacts to government's legislation: 
 

The House speaks to gun control advocate Heidi Rathjen, co-founder of the gun control group PolySeSouvient, about whether controversy over a proposed amendment to the government’s firearms legislation might put in jeopardy her thirty-year-long quest to have assault rifles banned.

The amendment has been supported by gun control advocates such as Heidi Rathjen, who recently told The House that the government should have been more effective at communicating what she said was a worthwhile change.

Debate at the parliamentary committee stalled this week before the Liberals, New Democrats and Bloc Québécois pushed for a motion calling for more witnesses to testify on the amendment.

The Liberals then said the Conservatives were obstructing progress on the issue, prompting Dancho to rise in the House of Commons to accuse the government of lying. That led to her expulsion from the chamber after she refused to apologize.

"This is an attack on the culture of hunting in this country that's centuries old.... So for them to get up in the House of Commons to say Conservatives are part of the problem when we're standing up for Canadian hunters — it is a lie," she told reporters in the House foyer shortly after her expulsion.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Christian Paas-Lang covers federal politics for CBC News in Ottawa as an associate producer with The House and a digital writer with CBC Politics. You can reach him at christian.paas-lang@cbc.ca.

With files from Alex Zabjek

 
 
 

Conservative MP Raquel Dancho, government House leader Mark Holland on Dancho's ejection from House

Conservative MP Raquel Dancho speaks with reporters following her ejection from the House of Commons. The temporary removal came after Dancho declined to apologize for comments made during a question period exchange on Bill C-21, the government's firearms legislation. She accused Liberal MP Vance Badawey, the parliamentary secretary to the minister of Indigenous Services, of lying as he responded to a question posed by her caucus colleague Dane Lloyd. Government House Leader Mark Holland also speaks with reporters about the incident. (December 8, 2022)


 
 

BREAKING: Another Liberal coverup in Parliament.

3.64K subscribers
BREAKING: Another Liberal coverup in Parliament. The Liberal MPs and Liberal Senators voted down our Conservative motion to provide Canadians with documents that Justin Trudeau relied upon to invoke the Emergencies Act. Shameful! Canadians deserve better!
As soon as I watched this I called the ex cop Glen Motz again and his assistant played dumb
 

 
 
 

Notice of meeting Amended

Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security (SECU)
44th Parliament, 1st Session
 
Meeting 52
Tuesday, December 6, 2022, 3:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.
Webcast
 
Clause-by-Clause Consideration
Amended Section
Witnesses
Department of Justice
• Paula Clarke, Counsel, Criminal Law Policy Section
• Phaedra Glushek, Counsel, Criminal Law Policy Section
Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness
• Rachel Mainville-Dale, Acting Director General, Firearms Policy
Royal Canadian Mounted Police
• Rob Daly, Director, Strategic Policy, Canadian Firearms Program
• Murray Smith, Technical Specialist, Canadian Firearms Program
 
 
Clerk of the committee
Simon Larouche (613-944-5635)
 
 
 
 

SECU Meeting 52

56K subscribers
Kristina Michaud (Bloc Quebecois) and Taleeb Noormohamed question the panel regarding the G4 amendment to Bill C-21. 𝐌𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐝𝐞𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐬: https://www.ourcommons.ca/DocumentVie... 
 
𝐆𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐬: 
Rob Daly, Director, Strategic Policy, Canadian Firearms Program 
Murray Smith, Technical Specialist, Canadian Firearms Program 
Paula Clarke, Criminal Law Policy Section 
Phaedra Glushek, Criminal Law Policy Section 
Rachel Mainville-Dale, Acting Director General, Firearms Policy 
 
00:51 - Introductions  
01:28 - Kristina Michaud (Bloc)
01:01:53 - Taleeb Noormohamed  
01:33:42 - Closing discussion 
 
 #cdnpoli #canada #secu

Methinks Madam Michaud is no fan yours N'esy Pas?
 
 
 
 
 ---------- Original message ----------
From: "Michaud, Kristina - Députée" <Kristina.Michaud@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 14:58:06 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : Auto: Methinks the Standing Committee
on Public Safety and National Security are gonna have a Hell of a
hearing on All Hallows Eve N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Bonjour,

Nous accusons réception de votre courriel.

Votre demande sera traitée dans les plus brefs délais et nous
communiquerons avec vous pour y donner suite. Pour rencontrer un
membre de notre équipe, veuillez prendre rendez-vous par téléphone au
bureau de circonscription le plus près.

Si vous décidez d'appeler à l'un de nos bureaux en attente d'une
réponse courriel, veuillez-nous en aviser.


Cordialement,

L'Équipe de
Kristina Michaud
Députée d’Avignon-La Mitis-Matane-Matapédia
Bloc Québécois | Chambre des communes


kristina.michaud@parl.gc.ca<
mailto:kristina.michaud@parl.gc.ca>


Bureau d'Amqui : 418-629-6456

Bureau de Price : 418-429-9278

Bureau de Matane : 418-562-0343

Bureau de Carleton-sur-Mer : 418-364-6254

Bureau d'Ottawa : 613-295-1013


________________________________________________________

Ce message est confidentiel et ne s’adresse qu’au destinataire.
S’il vous a été transmis par erreur, veuillez le détruire et m’en aviser.
Merci.
 
 

Automatic reply: Auto: Methinks the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security are gonna have a Hell of a hearing on All Hallows Eve N'esy Pas?



Unstarred  MacGregor, Alistair - M.P.Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 2:33 PM
Unstarred  Van Bynen, Tony - M.P.Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 2:33 PM
Unstarred  Shipley, Doug - M.P.Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 2:33 PM

Unstarred  Damoff, Pam - M.P.Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 2:33 PM

Unstarred  Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’OntarioMon, Oct 31, 2022 at 2:33 PM

Unstarred  Damoff, Pam - M.P.Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 10:58 AM

Unstarred  Shipley, Doug - M.P.Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 10:58 AM

Unstarred  Van Bynen, Tony - M.P.Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 10:58 AM

Add star 

MacGregor, Alistair - M.P.

<Alistair.MacGregor@parl.gc.ca>
Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 10:58 AM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Sent from the office of Alistair MacGregor, MP

Thank you for your email and for taking the time to contact me and express your views.

This automatic response is to let you know that I have received your message. I regularly review all communications sent to me, however, due to the high volume of emails received I may not be able to respond personally to each one. In most cases, anonymous, cc'd, and forwarded items will not receive a response. Every effort will be made to reply to you as soon as possible.

If you are a resident of the Cowichan-Malahat-Langford constituency and your concerns are with a federal government ministry or agency, we would be happy to look into the matter for you and assist to the best of our ability. Please ensure that you have included your full name, address, postal code, telephone number, and the details of your situation so my office is able to assist you efficiently. If the matter is time-sensitive, please call my office directly at 1-866-609-9998. If we are unable to answer your call immediately, please leave a voicemail and we will return your call at our earliest opportunity.

If you are not sure if you live within the Cowichan-Malahat-Langford constituency, you can check by entering your postal code here: http://www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members

 

Thank you again for your email, and for taking the time to share your thoughts and concerns with me.

 

Sincerely,

 

Alistair MacGregor, Member of Parliament

Cowichan-Malahat-Langford

1-866-609-9998
alistairmacgregor.ca

alistair.macgregor@parl.gc.ca

 

UFCW 232



 

David Amos

<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 10:56 AM
To: "larry.brock" <larry.brock@parl.gc.ca>, "Ron.McKinnon" <Ron.McKinnon@parl.gc.ca>, "Kristina.Michaud" <Kristina.Michaud@parl.gc.ca>, paul.chiang@parl.gc.ca, "pam.damoff" <pam.damoff@parl.gc.ca>, "glen.motz" <glen.motz@parl.gc.ca>, "Tony.VanBynen" <Tony.VanBynen@parl.gc.ca>, "Peter.Schiefke" <Peter.Schiefke@parl.gc.ca>, alistair.macgregor@parl.gc.ca, Doug.Shipley@parl.gc.ca, rob.stewart@ps-sp.gc.ca, "Nathalie.G.Drouin" <Nathalie.G.Drouin@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, marcel.beaudin@opp.ca, jeffery.hutchinson@pco-bcp.gc.ca, Thomas.Carrique@opp.ca, pat.morris@opp.ca, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, jdp@tdslaw.com, joel@joelharden.ca, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, "pierre.poilievre" <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, frank.au@ontario.ca, shantona@papechaudhury.com, leonj@bennettjones.com, edann@edlaw.ca, gpoliquin@ovcounsel.com, pierrette.ringuette@sen.parl.gc.ca, Patrick.Brazeau@sen.parl.gc.ca, george.furey@sen.parl.gc.ca, larry.campbell@sen.parl.gc.ca, Bev.Busson@sen.parl.gc.ca, nrodriguez@conwaylitigation.ca, mduckett@dsscrimlaw.com, srp@tdslaw.com, mtsurumi@legalanalysis.ca, tcurry <tcurry@litigate.com>, kris.austin@gnb.ca, rokaku8@gmail.com, jcarpay@jccf.ca, traversy.n@gmail.com, kingpatrick278 <kingpatrick278@gmail.com>, rick <rick@petersoncapital.ca>, nsinvestigators <nsinvestigators@gmail.com>, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino" <Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, cvangeyn@theccf.ca, christopher.rupar@justice.gc.ca, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, editor@dalgazette.com, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Perspectives@poec-cedu.gc.ca, mckeown@danielbrownlaw.ca, greg@gregdelbigio.com


Trust that I just called Glen Motz and Larry Brock again

On 10/31/22, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Perspectives (POEC/CEDU)" <Perspectives@poec-cedu.gc.ca>
> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 13:46:38 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Colleen McKeown I just called Trust
> that Greg DelBigio and a legion of RCMP members should remember me
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Hello / Bonjour,
>
> Merci pour votre message/soumission écrite à la Commission sur l’état
> d’urgence. Ceci pour vous aviser que nous avons bien reçu votre
> message/soumission écrite.
>
> Veuillez noter que nous recevons tous les jours un nombre élevé de
> courriels. Nous répondrons à votre demande ou accuserons réception de
> votre soumission écrite dès que possible; cela peut prendre plusieurs
> jours.
>
> Pour plus d’information sur notre processus de consultation publique,
> veuillez consulter l'adresse suivante :
> https://commissionsurletatdurgence.ca/exprimez-vous/
>
> https://commissionsurletatdurgence.ca/
> Twitter : @CommissionEDU<https://twitter.com/CommissionEdu>
> Facebook : Commission sur l’état d’urgence |
> Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/CommissionEDU>
>
> ***
> Thank you for your message/submission to the Public Order Emergency
> Commission. This is to advise you that we have received your
> message/submission.
>
> Please note that we receive a high volume of emails every day. We will
> respond to your request or acknowledge receipt of your comment or
> submission as soon as possible; this may take up to several days.
>
> You can find out more about our public submissions process on our
> website at, https://publicorderemergencycommission.ca/share-your-views/
>
> https://publicorderemergencycommission.ca/
> Twitter: @POECommission<https://twitter.com/POECommission>
> Facebook:  Public Order Emergency Commission - Home |
> Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/PublicOrderEC/>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: keepcanada <keepcanada@protonmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 16:16:24 +0000
> Subject: Auto: Methinks the Standing Committee on Public Safety and
> National Security are gonna have a Hell of a hearing on All Hallows
> Eve N'esy Pas?
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>
> Your amazing Canada, thank you so much. We have added this link to
> organize helpers! If you are wanting to help please fill out a form so
> we can delegate loglogistic and location!! Freedom together !
> http://register.adopt-a-trucker.ca/
>
> Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2022/10/nova-scotia-mass-shooting-oct-23-2022.html
>
>
> Friday, 28 October 2022
>
> Nova Scotia Mass Shooting - October Surprise 2022 - with the help of
> Paul Palango and his pals
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGUnEKseIbs&ab_channel=CBCNews
>
>
> Did Ottawa interfere in the investigation of the Nova Scotia mass shooting?
> 42,144 views
> Jun 21, 2022
> 449
> CBC News
>  3.2M subscribers
> A report released by a public inquiry into the 2020 Nova Scotia mass
> shooting suggests RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki had promised the
> government to release information regarding the firearms used in the
> tragedy. MPs Taleeb Noormohamed and Raquel Dancho weigh in. To read
> more: http://cbc.ca/1.6496511
>
> 293 Comments
>
> David Amos
> David Amos
> Methinks CBC et al should start reviewing my emails N'esy Pas?
>
>
>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSNsXrLt7pQ&ab_channel=mistersunshinebaby
>
>
> Trudeau's Latest Scandal, Covering Up Voice Recording
> 116,234 views
> Oct 28, 2022
> mistersunshinebaby
> 246K subscribers
> Buy Me A Coffee! https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/miste...
> Come join me on the most POPULAR Politics Discord to talk about
> Politics - https://discord.gg/TgMsmdeHah
>
> 1,092 Comments
>
> David Amos
> David Amos
> Have you read my email yet?
>
>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l96DgtXXF8w&ab_channel=mistersunshinebaby
>
>
> Someone Is Lying, So Who Is It?
> 6,051 views
> Oct 29, 2022
>
> mistersunshinebaby
> 246K subscribers
> Buy Me A Coffee! https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/miste...
> Come join me on the most POPULAR Politics Discord to talk about
> Politics - https://discord.gg/TgMsmdeHah
>
>
> 133 Comments
>
> David Amos
> David Amos
> Everybody knows that Raquel Dancho is a liar too
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bv9KCVBWpV4&ab_channel=LittleGreyCells
>
>
> Cons MP/Pubic Safety critic Raquel Dancho call on Minister Bill Blair
> & Commissioner Lucki to resign
> 487 views
> Oct 22, 2022
>
> Little Grey Cells
> 3.48K subscribers
> 22 Comments
>
> David Amos
> David Amos
> For the Public Record I called Raquel Dancho's office again the day
> she made this announcement. Her assistant denied knowing anything
> about my prior calls or emails so I hung up after informing him that
> at least her computer was ethical
>
>
> CON-CAN
> CON-CAN
> We should all write to her and let her know that we want them to say
> 23. We'll see if she does.
>
> Peter Byker
> Peter Byker
> easy peasy! I just sent this to her via raquel dancho .com --- Thank
> you, Ms. Dancho. The MCC, SECU participants etc. need to acknowledge
> vocally that 23 lives were lost in Nova Scotia. Reality demands that
> we underscore the tragedy of poor baby Beaton as fulsomely as
> possible. Thank you for all you do to restore Canada's reputation as a
> Justice-seeking people.
> 😇
>
>
>
> SoLVersSoCieTy
> SoLVersSoCieT
> Gotta Wonder if they aren't insisting on saying 22 as a comm Regarding
> that garden group with 22 members..🤔
>
>
>
> Tay Mar
> Tay Mar
> Political interference and pressure???? Say it isn't so!
>
>
>
> MARK MESSER
> MARK MESSER
> Excellent
>
>
>
> Peter Byker
> Peter Byker
> Music to my ears! Keep the pressure on our Govt. and make things right
> again in Canada. The future is still being written!
>
> Little Grey Cells
> Lessons from the MCC... still being written.
>
> David Amos
> David Amos
>  @Little Grey Cells  Yea Right BUT BY WHOM???
>
>
>
> SoLVersSoCieTy
> SoLVersSoCieTy
> Raquel is not only extremely intelligent and well versed.. she's drop
> dead gorgeous too🥴
>
> David Amos
> David Amos
> Never mind how pretty she is trust that somebody is tired of her bullshit
>
>
>
> Joanne Willoughby
> Joanne Willoughby
> Absolutely he should resign today!!
>
>
>
> Tay Mar
> Tay Mar
> STOP SENDING $$ TO UKRAINE!
>
> Bonnie McLaren
> Bonnie McLaren
> Remember when Trudeau gave $ to we charity that his mother and brother
> spoke at, his $10.5 mil to Omar made, and his gift $ to talk show host
> Trevor Noah...
>
> David Amos
> David Amos
> I concur Furthermore the Subject line of my email to Raquel Dancho and
> her computer's response easily proves I was saying such things out of
> the gate
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Dancho, Raquel - M.P."
> Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2022 07:30:10 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act and
> Freeland defending her liberal democracy byway of her bankster buddies
> To: David Amos
>
>
>
> Tay Mar
> Tay Mar
> Ottawa needs a cleaning
>
>
>
> Dan Levesque
> Dan Levesque
> The best looking and smartest and down to earth as in common sense
> first prime minister of Canada to be elected. Keep it up please.
>
> David Amos
> David Amos
> Dream on
>
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2022/02/trudeau-invoking-emergency-act-and.html
>
> Saturday, 19 February 2022
> Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act and Freeland defending her liberal
> democracy byway of her bankster buddies
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Dancho, Raquel - M.P." <Raquel.Dancho@parl.gc.ca>
> Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2022 07:30:10 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act and
> Freeland defending her liberal democracy byway of her bankster buddies
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Hello,
> We appreciate you taking the time to contact the Office of Raquel
> Dancho, Member of Parliament for Kildonan—St. Paul.
> Our office receives 100’s of emails each week:
> •   If you are a Kildonan–St. Paul constituent, please reply to this
> email with your name and current address with postal code. This will
> ensure we expedite your correspondence. We may also be reached by
> phone at the Winnipeg office at 204-984-6322. We would be pleased to
> assist you.
> •    If your organization is requesting a meeting with MP Dancho,
> please allow 2 weeks for staff to process your request.
> •   Individuals outside of Kildonan—St. Paul should contact their
> local MP to address their concerns. You can find out who your MP is at
> this link: Find Members of Parliament - Members of Parliament - House
> of Commons of Canada
> (ourcommons.ca)<https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en>
> •    If you are contacting MP Dancho regarding an immigration case
> from outside of Canada unfortunately we are unable to assist. To avoid
> delays please direct your inquiry to Immigration, Refugees, and
> Citizenship Canada at this link: My immigration or citizenship
> application -
> Canada.ca<https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/application.html>
> Sincerely,
> Office of Raquel Dancho, MP
>
>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvE4oLmJn20&ab_channel=NationalPost
>
>
> RCMP release audio of tense call with Lucki after N.S. massacre
> 38,890 views
> Oct 20, 2022
>
> National Post
> 104K subscribers
> Subscribe http://www.youtube.com/user/nationalp... RCMP release audio
> of tense call with Lucki after N.S. massacre
>
> 675 Comments
>
> David Amos
> David Amos
> Surprise Surprise Surprise
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vs_p-Fh7PBI&t=21s&ab_channel=NationalPost
>
>
> Full Testimony: RCMP's Brenda Lucki on alleged political interference
> in N.S. massacre investigation
> 15,896 views
> Jul 25, 2022
> National Post
> 104K subscribers
> Subscribe http://www.youtube.com/user/nationalp... RCMP boss Brenda
> Lucki appears before commons committee on N.S. shooting probe.
>
>
> 265 Comments
>
> David Amos
> David Amos
> Methinks the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security
> are gonna have a Hell of a hearing on All Hallows Eve N'esy Pas?
>
> Meeting 43
> Allegations of Political Interference in the 2020 Nova Scotia Mass
> Murder Investigation 3:30 p.m. - 5:30 p.m. (EDT)
>
>

>
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Committees/en/SECU/Meetings
>
>
> Committees SECU
> Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security
> Follow @HoCCommittees for tweets from #SECU
> Meetings
> Newsletter 44th Parliament, 1st Session
> (November 22, 2021 - Present)
> Future Meetings
> Tomorrow
> Meeting 43
> Allegations of Political Interference in the 2020 Nova Scotia Mass
> Murder Investigation
> 3:30 p.m. - 5:30 p.m. (EDT)
> 3:30 p.m. - 5:30 p.m. (EDT)
> Wellington Building, Room 425
> Webcast
> Studies and Activities
>
>     Allegations of Political Interference in the 2020 Nova Scotia Mass
> Murder Investigation
>
>
>
>
> https://www.ourcommons.ca/Committees/en/SECU/StudyActivity?studyActivityId=11872400
>
>
> 44th Parliament, 1st Session
> (November 22, 2021 - Present)
> Meeting Requested by Five Members of the Committee to Discuss their
> Request to Undertake a Study of Development regarding the allegations
> of political interference in the Nova Scotia Mass Murder Investigation
> First meeting scheduled for: Monday, October 24, 2022
> Monday, October 24, 2022
> Meeting 40
>
>
https://masscasualtycommission.ca/calendar/event/100016/
>
> Virtual Proceeding
> October 27, 2022 11:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
>
> The Commission will hold a brief virtual proceeding on October 27,
> 2022 to mark additional documents as exhibits.
>
> Agenda
>
> The Commission will hold a brief virtual proceeding on October 27,
> 2022 to mark additional documents as exhibits. The additional exhibits
> will include supporting material for public proceedings that were not
> previously marked, interview transcripts, Commission correspondence
> for the public record, and documents produced to the Commission after
> the completion of public proceedings.
>
> Note
>
>     View the documents section for Research, Foundational Documents
> and Additional Exhibits that are entered into evidence during
> proceedings.
>     To learn more about the Commission's third and final phase of
> work, visit the frequently asked questions page.
>
>
> https://atlantic.ctvnews.ca/living-here-is-a-complete-nightmare-portapique-survivor-of-n-s-shooting-struggling-with-little-support-1.6126770
>
> 'Living here is a complete nightmare': Portapique survivor of N.S.
> shooting struggling with little support
>
> Leon Joudrey, who lives in Portapique, N.S., is interviewed by CTV
> Atlantic on Oct. 26, 2022.Leon Joudrey, who lives in Portapique, N.S.,
> is interviewed by CTV Atlantic on Oct. 26, 2022.
> Heidi Petracek
> CTV News Atlantic Reporter
> Published Oct. 26, 2022 9:14 p.m. ADT
>
> PORTAPIQUE, N.S. -
>
> Leon Joudrey's home is surrounded by terrible memories of the night
> his friends and neighbours just down the road were killed in Nova
> Scotia's mass shooting.
>
> “Living here is a complete nightmare, all I see is my friends that
> died, and fires, and SWAT teams and I don't even want to be here
> anymore,” he says.
>
> After the April 2020 tragedy, Joudrey spent almost two years living
> anywhere he could but Portapique.
>
> But he had to return to maintain the house and 3.5 acres of land off
> Orchard Beach Road after unsuccessfully trying to sell the property.
>
> The modest bungalow, it’s basement recently finished by Joudrey, is
> where the killer’s common-law-spouse, Lisa Banfield, ran to for help
> in the early morning hours of April 19, 2020 after she hid from
> Gabriel Wortman overnight after he assaulted her during an argument.
>
> By that time, Joudrey had already smelled a structure fire burning
> somewhere in the community. When he took a drive to try to find the
> source, he encountered an ERT team in a tactical vehicle, and says he
> was simply ordered over a loudspeaker to leave the area.
>
> Not knowing what was going on, he returned to his house and his two dogs.
>
> Down the road, his friends and neighbours, Greg and Jamie Blair, had
> already been murdered at their home.
>
> His ex-girlfriend Lisa McCully had also been killed in front of her home.
>
> Joudrey didn’t know about the killings until after another ERT team
> came to his home to extract Banfield from the community.
>
> He says the officers didn’t even ask his name and left him there while
> Wortman was still at large.
>
> “I'm the lucky one, I survived,” Joudrey told CTV News in an interview
> a month after the 22 murders.
>
> However, his experience continues to haunt him and has taken a toll.
>
> “And I was taking stuff out on people and social media, and then the
> police picked me up one night, took me to the (psychiatric) hospital,
> and that's where I spent the next month,” he says.
>
> Once he was released from hospital, Joudrey says there was no mental
> health follow-up, although he says he has been diagnosed with PTSD.
>
> “Well, they kind of forgot about me,” he says. “I kind of fell through
> the cracks in the mental health system and it was about four months
> before they did any follow up or checks with me."
>
> Joudrey says he is now seeing a psychiatrist and just connected with a
> psychologist in the past month. It’s been two-and-a-half years since
> the tragedy.
>
> One of the lawyers representing many of the families of victims and
> survivors says Joudrey’s struggle is indicative of what many are going
> through.
>
> “A number of them feel, just forgotten about,” says Sandra McCulloch.
>
> “There are people who are survivors of the mass casualty event that
> are still having a hard time, they're still not fully supported."
>
> The issue of supporting survivors is one she raised at the Mass
> Casualty Commission examining the tragedy.
>
> “I know this does come within the umbrella of the work that the
> commission is doing, but we have also been concerned that there’s been
> focus on, and rightfully so, on those who have been lost, and the
> families they’ve left behind. And there’s been broader focus on our
> communities in general and how improvements can be made to prevent and
> address events that may be comparable to this in the future,” she
> says.
>
> “But there does seem to be those people that may fall in the middle
> that aren’t as immediately affected by the mass casualty event, in the
> way that we might first come to think of.”
>
> “Their own experiences, they’re unique,” she adds. “And we’re
> certainly hoping that the Mass Casualty Commission will be attentive
> to the recommendations that support individuals like the survivors as
> well.”
>
> The municipal councillor for the Portapique area at the time of the
> shootings, Tom Taggart, agrees that some residents in the area are
> still facing challenges.
>
> “It's as big or a bigger struggle today as it was back then,” says
> Taggart, now the PC MLA for Colchester North.
>
> He says for some, there is sadness over the loss of what the community once
> was.
>
> “And now, the community that they had loved so much is gone, in a
> sense, that little community within that community,” he says. “They’ve
> lost that (within that subdivision), they’ll never get it back.”
>
> “They were sort of over here, the focus was all on the inquiry and the
> RCMP, the victims, and these folks are quietly trying to rebuild their
> lives, and it's not easy,” says Taggart.
>
> Joudrey describes it in another way.
>
> “It's been hell,” he says.
>
> Joudrey says he’s also under financial strain.
>
> It's been almost two years since he was able to work at his former
> forestry job, and he says disability benefits through his employer
> will run out in early 2023.
>
> He says he’s now waiting for a letter from his psychiatrist to see if
> he can return to work.
>
> While $6.2 million was raised in donations to the “Stronger Together”
> fund administered by the Canadian Red Cross in response to the
> shootings, the organization says that money was earmarked for family
> members of those killed in the tragedy.
>
> “In particular with a focus on those who had dependents who relied
> upon someone who is no longer with us,” says Bill Lawlor with the
> Canadian Red Cross.
>
> “But certainly if anyone had an inquiry, we would encourage them to
> reach out to us.”
>
> But that means survivors such as Joudrey did not qualify for the
> assistance, which the Red Cross says has all been committed and either
> dispersed or held in trust.
>
> Joudrey wants to sell his property, but isn’t sure he’ll get enough
> for it to be able to make a new start.
>
> But he doesn’t want to stay in a place that reminds him of the past.
>
> “It’s not the same anymore,” he says.
>
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MuujxfGxmno&ab_channel=ohdear
>
>
> Oct 26th 2022 Interview
> 6 views
> Oct 27, 2022
> oh dear
> 64 subscribers
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AO3WCEeBfrY&ab_channel=LittleGreyCells
>
> Leon Joudrey: in his own words
> 9,896 views
> Premiered Oct 11, 2020
> Little Grey Cells
> 3.48K subscribers
>
> 59 Comments
>
> David Amos
> David Amos
> As I watched, read and listened to Paul Palango and his pals yap
> tonight I felt honoured by the fact that you people do not have the
> balls to say my name
>
 
 

 
Liberal Speaker removed Conservative MP from the House because she called out the Liberals for lying. #StandwithRaquel 
Methinks it rather comical that the Lady who protests too much for Mr Rota is sitting beside the aptly named lawyer Rob Moore N'esy Pas?
 
 
 ---------- Original message ----------
From: "O'Toole, Erin - M.P." <Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 15:07:02 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Erin.OToole Methinks Leslie Bory, his
many cohorts and his new MP Larry Brock don't care about my concerns
with my Freedoms and Rights N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting the office of the Hon. Erin O’Toole, Member
of Parliament for Durham.

Mr. O’Toole greatly values your feedback. Please note, this account
receives an extremely high volume of emails. As a result, we are
prioritizing constituent emails only at this time. If you are a
constituent in the riding of Durham and did not include your postal
code in your original email, please forward your original message to
erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca<mailto:erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca> with your postal
code included.

For Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) Applications,
please be advised that our office is only able to inquire about the
status of an application after it has gone beyond Posted Processing
Times. Processing times can be found on the IRCC website
www.cic.gc.ca/english/information/times/index.asp<http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/information/times/index.asp>.
If your application has exceeded these timelines and/or your matter is
urgent, please call our office. Urgent cases may include,
•    Cases of alleged departmental errors;
•    Times-sensitive cases such as:
•    Enforcement cases requiring urgent attention (imminent removal,
for example);
•    Life-or-death situations.

For IRCC applications that do not have processing times allocated, all
status updates can be located on your online account. Our office will
not be able to provide any additional information.

Due to the high volume of emails that we receive in this inbox, if
your email is regarding an urgent or time-sensitive case matter,
please contact the Constituency Office at:

Tel: 905-697-1699
Toll Free: 1-866-436-1141

We've moved!
New Durham Constituency Office
68 King St. E., Unit D
Bowmanville, ON
L1C 3X2

If you are a member of the media wishing to request an interview with
MP O’Toole, please email
Clarissa.schurter.423@parl.gc.ca<mailto:Clarissa.schurter.423@parl.gc.ca>.

To contact the Leader of the Official Opposition, please email:
pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca<mailto:pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>.
To find your Member of Parliament, please visit
https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en.

Thank you.

Office of Hon. Erin O’Toole, P.C., C.D.
Member of Parliament — Durham
 

YO Erin.OToole Methinks Leslie Bory, his many cohorts and his new MP Larry Brock don't care about my concerns with my Freedoms and Rights N'esy Pas?

David Amos

<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 11:06 AM
To: larry@larrybrock.ca, larry.brock@parl.gc.ca, Vball@postmedia.com, LeslieBory@canadianschoice.com, Brian Ruhe <brian@brianruhe.ca>, paul <paul@paulfromm.com>, johnturmel@yahoo.com, Premier@gov.ab.ca, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, mapleparty@yahoo.ca, AgentMargaritaville <AgentMargaritaville@protonmail.com>, traversy.n@gmail.com, kingpatrick278 <kingpatrick278@gmail.com>, "Kevin.leahy" <Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "freedomreport.ca" <freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>, Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nt.ca>


Deja Vu Anyone???

On 11/14/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
 
 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "O'Toole, Erin - M.P." <Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 17:17:50 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Leslie Bory I just called from 902 800 0369
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

On behalf of the Hon. Erin O’Toole, thank you for contacting the
Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition.

Mr. O’Toole greatly values feedback and input from Canadians.  We read
and review every incoming e-mail.  Please note that this account
receives a high volume of e-mails.  We reply to e-mails as quickly as
possible.

If you are a constituent of Mr. O’Toole’s in Durham with an urgent
matter please contact his constituency office at:

Office of Erin O’Toole, M.P.
54 King Street East, Suite 103
Bowmanville, ON L1C 1N3
Tel: (905) 697-1699 or Toll-Free (866) 436-1141

Once again, thank you for writing.

Sincerely,



Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition

------------------------------
----------------------------------------------

Au nom de l’hon. Erin O’Toole, merci de communiquer avec le Bureau du
chef de l’Opposition officielle.

M. O’Toole apprécie beaucoup le point de vue et les commentaires des
Canadiens et des Canadiennes. Nous lisons tous les courriels que nous
recevons. Veuillez noter que ce compte reçoit beaucoup de courriels.
Nous y répondons le plus rapidement possible.

Si vous êtes un électeur ou une électrice de M. O’Toole dans la
circonscription de Durham et que vous avez une question urgente,
veuillez communiquer avec son bureau de circonscription, au :

Bureau d’Erin O’Toole, député
54, rue King Est, bureau 103
Bowmanville (Ontario) L1C 1N3
Tél. : (905) 697-1699 ou sans frais : (866) 436-1141

Encore une fois merci d’avoir pris le temps d’écrire.

Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées,



Bureau du chef de l’Opposition officielle


Lawrence J. Brock is a Canadian politician who was elected to
represent the riding of Brantford—Brant in the House of Commons of
Canada in the 2021 Canadian federal election.[1] Prior to his
election, he was the assistant Crown attorney for Brantford.[2]
Electoral record
2021 Canadian federal election
Party   Candidate       Votes   %       ±%
        Conservative    Larry Brock     26,668  40.3    +0.03   
        Liberal         Alison Macdonald        18,784  28.4    -2.28   
        New Democratic  Adrienne Roberts        12,950  19.6    -0.1   
        People's        Cole Squire     5,634   8.5     +6.52   
        Green   Karleigh Csordas        1,760   2.7     -3.69   
        Independent     Leslie Bory     162     0.2     +0.03   
        Independent     John Turmel     138     0.2     -0.02   
Total valid votes       66,096  100
Total rejected ballots  0       0       -0.74
Turnout         66,096  59.52   -2.32
Eligible voters         111,048
Source: Elections Canada[3]


https://www.brantfordexpositor.ca/news/local-news/conservative-candidate-walks-out-over-independents-remarks

 Conservative candidate walks out over independent's remarks
Author of the article:
Vincent Ball
Publishing date:October 16, 2019  .
There were 97,409 electors in Brantford-Brant in the 2015 federal
election. Elections Canada


A meeting for Brantford-Brant candidates in the Oct. 21 federal
election got off to a rocky start Tuesday night when Conservative Phil
McColeman left after another candidate made anti-Semitic and
anti-immigration remarks.

McColeman, who is seeking a fourth term, walked out of the
mini-theatre at North Park Collegiate after first raising objections
about opening remarks made by independent Leslie Bory. The meeting was
organized by the Canadian Federation of University Women Brantford,
with support of the Retired Teachers of Ontario Brant District 40

Justin Trudeau: Climate hero or Net-Zero hysteric? | Ivison Ep. 27



“If you’re going to allow comments like that I’m leaving,” McColeman
said to the organizers.

A video of Bory’s remarks and the full debate can be found at:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=dP3qPcgXX5I .

Bory’s comments also drew criticism from several people in the
audience and other candidates.

“There’s no place for that kind of talk here,” said Jeff Gallagher, of
the Veteran’s Coalition Party of Canada.

New Democrat Sabrina Sawyer and Liberal Danielle Takacs also took
issue with Bory’s remarks but said they would remain at the meeting to
stand up to divisive political discourse.

Also taking part in Tuesday’s meeting were Bob Jonkman of the Green
Party, Dave Wrobel of the People’s Party of Canada and independent
John Turmel.

McColeman, who spoke to The Expositor on Wednesday, and a spokesperson
for the local NDP campaign said no one should be surprised by comments
made by Bory, who also ran as an independent in the June 2017
provincial election.

“He has a history of this kind of talk and the same thing happened at
the debate organized by the Muslim Association during the provincial
campaign,” Myles Hosie, the president of the NDP provincially and
federally, said. “It was so bad that Will Bouma walked out.”

Bouma, a Progressive Conservative who was elected Brantford-Brant MPP,
said he was disappointed at the time that he wasn’t joined by other
candidates in his walkout.

“He (Bory) may have the right to espouse his views but I don’t have to
share a podium or a stage with him or anyone else who speaks like
that,” he said in an interview Wednesday.

“There is a different political DNA in Brantford-Brant. We may
disagree on a lot of things but we should all be standing together on
this issue.”

When Hosie learned that Bory had been invited to Tuesday’s meeting, he
sent a letter expressing concerns to the organizers and the camps of
other candidates.

McColeman said he understood that Bory would be sanctioned if he
expressed anti-Semitic and offensive anti-immigration views during
Tuesday’s meeting.

‘If they (the organizers) had taken stronger action or if he (Bory)
had apologized or acknowledged that the had gone too far, then I might
have returned,” McColeman said. “But when that didn’t happen, that was
it for me.

“People need to understand that I’ve walked through the war cemeteries
of Europe where our fallen are buried. I know their sacrifice and I
feel it on a deeply personal level.”

He said he finds Bory’s views abhorrent and that the Conservative
Party stands against such views.

“I can’t state my outrage at those views strongly enough,” McColeman
said. “They go against everything that our veterans, our soldiers have
fought and died for.”


Lynn Haylock, one of the organizers of Tuesday’s meeting, acknowledged
that concerns about Bory’s behaviour were raised by candidates prior
to the event.

“When we heard he (Bory) had registered as a candidate, we invited him
….,” Haylock said. “We wanted to be as inclusive as possible….”

She said organizers discussed the concerns raised about Bory but
decided that he should be allowed to participate.

Organizers hired security and ensured candidates knew that if
offensive language was used, that a warning would be issued, Haylock
said.

“If the warning wasn’t heeded, the candidate would be told to leave,”
she said. “We had a plan and we stuck with it.

“We issued the warning and after that he (Bory) toned it down. I think
he got the message from us and the audience.”

Bory said he was glad to be able to participate in Tuesday’s meeting.
He was unaware of any efforts by other candidates to prevent him from
participating.

“I had no idea,” Bory said. “I thought the evening went well.

“They censored me a bit there but I think we worked around it and I
got a chance to stand up for Canadians and free speech.

Vball@postmedia.com
twitter.com/EXPVBall




On 11/14/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "O'Toole, Erin - M.P." <Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca>
> Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2021 13:57:55 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: YO Erin O’Toole Methinks before the writ is
> possibly dropped today you and Trudeau The Younger should enjoy
> watching ths video beginng at the 50 minute mark Nesy Pas?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> On behalf of the Hon. Erin O’Toole, thank you for contacting the
> Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition.
>
> Mr. O’Toole greatly values feedback and input from Canadians.  We read
> and review every incoming e-mail.  Please note that this account
> receives a high volume of e-mails.  We reply to e-mails as quickly as
> possible.
>
> If you are a constituent of Mr. O’Toole’s in Durham with an urgent
> matter please contact his constituency office at:
>
> Office of Erin O’Toole, M.P.
> 54 King Street East, Suite 103
> Bowmanville, ON L1C 1N3
> Tel: (905) 697-1699 or Toll-Free (866) 436-1141
>
> Once again, thank you for writing.
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
>
> Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Au nom de l’hon. Erin O’Toole, merci de communiquer avec le Bureau du
> chef de l’Opposition officielle.
>
> M. O’Toole apprécie beaucoup le point de vue et les commentaires des
> Canadiens et des Canadiennes. Nous lisons tous les courriels que nous
> recevons. Veuillez noter que ce compte reçoit beaucoup de courriels.
> Nous y répondons le plus rapidement possible.
>
> Si vous êtes un électeur ou une électrice de M. O’Toole dans la
> circonscription de Durham et que vous avez une question urgente,
> veuillez communiquer avec son bureau de circonscription, au :
>
> Bureau d’Erin O’Toole, député
> 54, rue King Est, bureau 103
> Bowmanville (Ontario) L1C 1N3
> Tél. : (905) 697-1699 ou sans frais : (866) 436-1141
>
> Encore une fois merci d’avoir pris le temps d’écrire.
>
> Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées,
>
>
> Bureau du chef de l’Opposition officielle
>
>
>
> https://www.bitchute.com/video/v9vGIDSun1PY/
>
> Political Prisoner Dr. James Sears Released from Prison on Parole -
> First Post Prison Interview
>
> First published at 13:27 UTC on November 8th, 2021.
>
>     #jamessears #hatespeech #canada
>
> channel image
>
> Brian Ruhe
>
> The Brian Ruhe Show
>
> 7803 subscribers
>
> TORONTO, October 1, 2021. The six protests organized by the Canadian
> Association for Free Expression outside the South Toronto Detention
> Centre played a definite role in political prisoner Dr. James Sears'
> release on early parole this morning. "Believe me, those protests
> helped you get early parole," a guard had told Dr. Sears.
>
> Dr. Sears emerged bearded and very thin, but cheerful, after serving
> four months of a 12 months sentence (the maximum) for writing satire
> of Jews and radical feminists, contrary to Canada's notorious "hate
> law" (Sec. 319 of the Criminal Code).
>
> He told supporters who hugged him and gave him a bouquet of flowers
> that he had gotten on well with fellow prisoners and most of the
> guards. The prison food was, he said, "garbage better than hospital
> food, but not as good as army food."
>
> "Freedom of speech is dying in Canada and will die because too many
> people just don't care. People may have to leave this country for
> freedom."
>
> A new generation of free speech activists will have to join the fight,
> he explained.
>
> "People should not be afraid of prison," he told his supporters. I'm
> 58 years old and survived," he said. In prison, he wrote 300 pages of
> several books, including a fictitious prison romance, based on
> reality, he grinned, between a political prisoner and a female guard.
>
> Several bad things happened to him in prison. "I was kept for 27 days
> in isolation. That was illegal. The maximum is 15." Even worse, prison
> authorities never gave him the legal papers he needed to argue his
> appeal. They ended up in his property bag.
>
> He said, as part of his probation, a propaganda course on anti-social
> behaviour. He looks forward to this as he hopes to convert the
> teachers.
>
> "I was a first time offender," he said, "but I was sentenced to a year
> in prison -- the maximum! One of my cellmates, who wished me the best
> of luck as I left, had been sentenced to nine and a half weeks. He'd
> stabbed a man, stolen a truck and had been found with a quantity of
> fentanyl." Just as in the old Soviet Union, common criminals are seen
> by the state as a sympathetic class. On the other hand, political
> dissidents receive the harshest treatment of the law. "Hate speech,"
> he said, "is considered the worst of the worst."
>
> It was a warm sunny Autumn morning: "I have been released from one
> prison into a COVID prison," he said to applause from the free speech
> supporters.
>
> He promised that he'd be writing about "the toxic culture" among the
> prison guards.
>
> In this video, Dr. James Sears was greeted by compatriots at the
> Toronto South Detention Center. He was wrongfully convicted of hate
> speech and sentenced to 1 year in jail.
>
> Thank you to Leslie Bory for making this video at the scene in Toronto.
>
>
> https://www.bitchute.com/video/DAGHVjuNhcG2/
>
> COVID Vaccine Protest at Vancouver City Hall, Nov. 7, 2021
>
>  First published at 19:59 UTC on November 10th, 2021.
>
>     #coivd #vaccine #controlledopposition
>
> channel image
>
> Brian Ruhe
>
> The Brian Ruhe Show
>
> 7803 subscribers
>
> I went to the protest on Sunday. You can hear Vlad was dissing "the
> Nazis" again. You can see my previous video about Vladislav Sobolev
> from Kazakhstan, at https://www.bitchute.com/video/zCEGa9DRPGY4/
>
> See the playlist: ANTI-COVID & VA…
>
>
> https://www.bitchute.com/video/wH5Gwkkl2xJe/
>
> DO CANADIANS HAVE THE WILL TO CLAW BACK THE RIGHTS STOLEN FROM THEM
> DURING COVID? - Paul Fromm
>
>  First published at 19:21 UTC on November 3rd, 2021.
>
>     #paulfromm #covid #rights
>
> channel image
>
> Brian Ruhe 2
>
> The Brian Ruhe Show
>
> 18 subscribers
>
> I've made 150 videos of Paul Fromm since 2015 but this is the first
> fireside chat and it's at my place. This was Oct. 28, 2021, the day
> after the previous video of him.
>
> Paul Fromm is the Director of the Canadian Association for Free Expression
> Winner of the George Orwell Free Speech Award, 1994
> email: paul@paulfromm.com
>
> See the Paul Fromm playlist of 100+ videos at
> https://www.bitchute.com/playlist/6XqCiP6tg2lC/
>
>
> https://www.bitchute.com/video/EsRzhMwOGQ9t/
>
>
> Making the Thefts of Our Freedoms Personal - Paul Fromm
>
>  First published at 01:54 UTC on October 30th, 2021.
>
>     #paulfromm #covid #freedom
>
> channel image
>
> Brian Ruhe 2
>
> The Brian Ruhe Show
>
> 18 subscribers
>
> "I Voted for Max & the People's Party of Canada" -- Where the Election
> Leaves Us & the Looming Soviet State of Cancelled Rights in Canada
>
> The Canadian Association for Free Expression Proudly Present
>
> Paul Fromm
> Director, Canadian Association for Free Expression
> Winner of the George Orwell Free Speech Award, 1994
> email: paul@paulfromm.com
>
> Talk followed by a discussion
> * Almost daily a new abuse -- vaccine apartheid in Quebec, Ontario,
> Manitoba & B.C.
> * Freedom protests banned outside hospitals in Alberta & Quebec
>
> VANCOUVER. Wednesday, October 27, 2021.
>
> See the Paul Fromm playlist of 100+ videos at
> https://www.bitchute.com/playlist/6XqCiP6tg2lC/
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 12:21:08 -0300
> Subject: Meet Norm Traversy and Agent Margaritaville Perhaps you
> should talk to the people in your neigbohood tryting to form a new
> politcal party
> To: mapleparty@yahoo.ca, AgentMargaritaville
> <AgentMargaritaville@protonmail.com>, traversy.n@gmail.com
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-NCrlPrp4c
>
> Norm Traversy and the P P C 's Susanna Russo talk #Taylormade #NewCanada &
> #PMP
> 1,065 views
> •Mar 1, 2020
> Agent Margaritaville
> 3.41K subscribers
> Audio Enhanced from original. I Sorry about the audio. I am dumb as a
> bag of hammer sometimes.
>
> However..... for those who want to listen deeply and get it. On
> February 25th, 2020, a group of like minded Canadians met in Ottawa to
> discuss the creation of a #Taylormade #NewCanada.
>
> Software designers, politicians, legal experts, financial experts,
> terrorism specialists and others discussed the elements of the
> #NewCanada model and the implementation and use of the #SmartMoney
> system.
>
> In this video Norm Traversy and The PPC's Founding Member Susanna
> Russo discuss the #NewCanada model with the sometimes vulgar (wouldn't
> you be) but usually awake Agent Margaritaville.
>
> Norman Traversy has agreed to represent the people of the #NewCanada
> party and take back Canada from Justin and his group of privy council
> selectees.
>
> The #PMP complex data system engine, which drives the unique nature of
> the #NewCanada block-chain system is a gift to all Canadians from
> Matthew Staikos.
>
> The #PMP model was designed by Michael Sherwood, Melissa G. and
> myself, who are all principles in the #GarSoft Systems Mill, which
> designed software for my nephew Matthew.
>
> Music: "Bend" by the extraordinary Michael Sherwood (1959 - 2020) and Steve
> P.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Leslie Bory <mapleparty@yahoo.ca>
> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 22:34:51 +0000 (UTC)
> Subject: how's it going and corona virus thoughts
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Hi David, it's been awhile since we've been in contact. I got my ass
> smoked again in the last federal election and was excluded from most
> debates. I did name the lampshade mafia as culprits behind our loss of
> freedom of speech. I was wondering what you think about the corona
> virus and the implications for Canadians regarding our freedom etc.
> All of the best to you. BTW I have 2 YouTube channels Rebellion Party
> and Brantford News. My phone number is 905 975 1209. I'm usually home
> after 5:30 pm if you would like to chat. I appreciate your advice as
> everything that you told me pretty much panned out except for a couple
> of things. Whitey was found in LA not in a grave down east. And I
> still haven't seen any evidence of homo activity from some others you
> warned me about. Although that Vancouver Club shit does sound greasy
> and it's members may have something to do with the missing women out
> west. I hope you keep doing what you are doing, you seem to be good at
> making goofs feel uneasy which is beautiful. Keep rockin.Les Bory
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Leslie Bory <mapleparty@yahoo.ca>
> Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 12:41:26 +0000 (UTC)
> Subject: Re: Methinks whereas Higgy now Tweets his Police State's news
> it only follows that he reads my Tweets about his nonsense N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
>  How's it going David? I read a few of the comments and you are
> correct. We should open up. I might make a few more vids on this shit.
> Good day.Les
>
>     On Sunday, May 3, 2020, 08:20:56 a.m. EDT, David Amos
> <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
> <Premier@ontario.ca>
> Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 12:11:08 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks whereas Higgy now Tweets his Police
> State's news it only follows that he reads my Tweets about his
> nonsense N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
> valued.
>
> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>
> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
> response may take several business days.
>
> Thanks again for your email.
> ______­­
>
> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>
> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>
> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>
> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 5/3/20, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
>> Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
>> Methinks whereas Higgy now Tweets his Police State's news it only
>> follows that he reads my Tweets about his nonsense N'esy Pas?
>>
>> https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/05/cracks-in-political-unity-appear-but.html
>>
>> #nbpoli #cdnpoli
>>
>>  https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/no-active-cases-1.5553542
>>
>>
>> ROUND TWO
>> N.B. reports no remaining active cases of COVID-19
>> Of the 118 confirmed cases of COVID-19 in New Brunswick, the province
>> says all have recovered
>> Philip Drost · CBC News · Posted: May 02, 2020 1:31 PM AT
>>
>> New Brunswick put out numbers on Saturday showing it is the first
>> province to have no active cases of COVID-19. (Government of New
>> Brunswick/Submitted)
>>
>>
>> 41 Comments
>>
>>
>> David Amos
>> Methinks I should holler BINGO then ask Higgy why are we still locked
>> down Nesy Pas?
>>
>> Terry Hughes
>> Reply to @David Amos:
>> you just don't get it do you !!!!!!
>>
>> Terry Hughes
>> Reply to @Terry Hughes: We need to keep it locked down for a bit longer
>>
>> David Amos
>> Reply to @Terry Hughes: Methinks whereas your hero Higgy now Tweets
>> his Police State's news it only follows that he reads my Tweets about
>> his nonsense N'esy Pas?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Carl Douglas
>> How long are we supposed to self isolate when in contact or with
>> symptoms?
>> Are we supposed to social distance in our household bubbles?
>> How many days has our province been self isolated? Provincial borders
>> closed when?
>> Can a province be a bubble? What constitutes a bubble?
>> Are the borders still closed? 14-day quarantine? Contact tracing?
>> How many people have been infected in NB? Recovered?
>> What is the mortality rate for virus in NB?
>> What is the mortality rate of influenza? Social distance? Close
>> borders? Close businesses?
>> What % of NB has the antibodies? Asymptomatic? Tests? Should we know
>> the results?
>> Can a province be a bubble? Do we social distance in our household
>> bubbles?
>> How many people in the province are at risk? Who make up this risk group?
>> Would it be easier to contain at risk or entire province?
>> What is a health crisis? No mechanism of control? Did self isolation
>> work? % Infected? Mortality rate?
>> When does a health crisis end? No infections? No deaths? Vaccine? Herd
>> Immunity?
>>
>> Andre Legault
>> Reply to @Carl Douglas:
>> One.
>>
>> john smith
>> Reply to @Carl Douglas: 60-80 % for herd immunity vaccines will be
>> forced everyone just went along with the precedent set by cardy, how
>> many people really were infected probably a lot. the mechanism going
>> forward should be swedish model isolating risk groups lowered immune
>> people and elderly watch other jurisdiction and professional hospitals
>> for treatment ignore who , gates foundation and as sad as it is the
>> moist speaking pm,
>>
>> john smith
>> Reply to @Carl Douglas: patent w02020060606 used to prove immunity of
>> the wuhan flu then to buy and sell
>>
>> john smith
>> Reply to @john smith: on your hand or forehead somebody isolated on
>> patmos had a dream about this along time ago
>>
>> David Amos
>> Reply to @Carl Douglas: Methinks the reason this article had no
>> comment section when it was first published was to avoid questions
>> such as yours N'esy Pas?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Terry Tibbs
>> OH NO, tell me it's not so..................
>> "The province plans fewer press briefings from now on. They will be
>> held on Monday, Wednesday and Friday."
>> Should we be expecting more tales of woe from SJ?
>>
>> David Amos
>> Reply to @Terry Tibbs: Mais Oui
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
>> <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
>> Date: Sat, 2 May 2020 13:15:25 +0000
>> Subject: RE: Methinks this email will put Howie Anglin and Dominic
>> Lebanc's fancy knickers in quite knot N'esy Pas Higgy?
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
>> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
>> comments.
>> Due to the evolving COVID-19 situation, we apologize in advance for
>> any delay in responding to your enquiry. In the meantime, information
>> on Canada's COVID-19 Economic Response Plan is available on the
>> Government of Canada website at
>> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus> or by
>> calling 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) or 1-833-784-4397.
>>
>> Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
>> Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
>> En raison de la fluidité de la crise de la COVID-19, il est possible
>> que nous retardions à vous répondre et nous nous en excusons.
>> Entre-temps, les informations au sujet du Plan d'intervention
>> économique du Canada pour répondre à la COVID-19 sont disponibles dans
>> le site Web du gouvernement du Canada au
>> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus> ou en
>> composant le
>> 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) ou le 1-833-784-4397.
>>
>>
>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: Office of the Premier <Premier@gov.ab.ca>
>>> Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 14:45:34 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Cracks in political unity appear, but
>>> Higgs holds firm on temporary foreign worker ban and my call to Nat
>>> Richard
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Thank you for contacting the Premier of Alberta.
>>>
>>> Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Alberta has declared a state of
>>> emergency under the Public Health Act. As a result, we are
>>> experiencing a higher-than-usual volume of emails. Please call
>>> 310-4455 from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. Monday to Friday, for questions about
>>> financial relief and government programs and services.
>>>
>>> Visit alberta.ca/covid19<http://www.alberta.ca/covid-19> and
>>> canada.ca/covid-19<https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/coronavirus-disease-covid-19.html>
>>> for the latest and most accurate information.
>>>
>>> Please note that Employment Insurance (EI) and the Canada Emergency
>>> Relief Benefit (CERB) are federal programs. Visit
>>> www.canada.ca/en/services/benefits/ei/cerb-application.html<https://www.canada.ca/en/services/benefits/ei/cerb-application.html>
>>> for more information.
>>>
>>> If you recently returned from travel outside Canada or have symptoms -
>>> cough, fever, fatigue or difficulty breathing:
>>> ·        stay home - do not go to an ER or clinic
>>> ·        take the COVID-19 self-assessment
>>> test<https://myhealth.alberta.ca/Journey/COVID-19/Pages/COVID-Self-Assessment.aspx>
>>> ·        call Health Link
>>> 811<http://www.albertahealthservices.ca/assets/healthinfo/link/index.html>
>>> for testing, instructions or any health-related inquiries.
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>>
>>> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
>>> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
>>> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
>>> the system manager. This message contains confidential information and
>>> is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named
>>> addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
>>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 18:40:25 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: Attn Leslie Bory I just called from 902 800 0369
> To: LeslieBory@canadianschoice.com, Brian Ruhe <brian@brianruhe.ca>,
> paul <paul@paulfromm.com>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>, johnturmel@yahoo.com
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=31&v=tJwVTDoEzug&feature=emb_title
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 22:50:25 -0300
> Subject: Lets see if John "The Engineer" Turmel Independent (519)
> 753-5122 or the liberal Adam Vaughan want to call me a liar in PUBLIC
> now EH Mr Harper??
> To: johnturmel@yahoo.com, info@votecamille.ca, info@benjaminsharma.ca,
> adam@adamvaughan.ca, Linda.Groce@chp.ca, joe@joecressy.ca,
> shahbaz.mir@greenparty.ca, campaign@trevorellis.ca,
> ElizabethLong@ndp.ca, creatinggoodpeople@gmail.com, arnold@liberal.ca,
> brian.deheer@greenparty.ca, kyle@liberal.ca, LoriMcDaniel@ndp.ca,
> "tim.moen" <tim.moen@mac.com>, david@davidyurdigaformp.ca,
> greenashmore@gmail.com, campaign@barlowformacleod.com,
> AileenBurke@ndp.ca, dustin@liberal.ca, leader@chp.ca,
> "vincent.mcdermott" <vincent.mcdermott@sunmedia.ca>,
> "ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca" <ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca>, lgunter
> <lgunter@shaw.ca>, "joshua.skurnik" <joshua.skurnik@hotmail.com>,
> frankffrost <frankffrost@hotmail.com>, "Pete.Berndsen"
> <Pete.Berndsen@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Geoffrey.McDonald"
> <Geoffrey.McDonald@gov.bc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney.a1@parl.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
> Mackap <Mackap@parl.gc.ca>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>,
> "justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, leader
> <leader@greenparty.ca>
>
> The RCMP the Green Meanies and the NDP  know that I am a Whistlblower
> about MONEY just like YOU and the The Liberal do
>
> This is an NDP supporters website CORRECT?
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/5-years-waiting-on-bank-fraud-payout.html
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/04/david-amos-nb-nwo-whistleblower-part-3.html
>
> Trust that I don"t give a good goddamn about cannabis like Trudeau the
> Younger does
>
> http://www.slideshare.net/samvekemans/41st-parliament-2014-by-elections-candidates-cannabis-policy-statements
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymonf Amos
> 902 800 0389
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 18:03:21 -0400
> Subject: Fwd: Re The very ethical Lonnie Landrud and what he knows
> about the Highway of Tears that the Human Rights Watch Bullshitters
> and Bob Paulson of the RCMP will never talk about
> To: wmjervis@hotmail.com, frankffrost <frankffrost@hotmail.com>, The
> Disinfector <thedisinfector@hotmail.com>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 21:00:58 -0400
> Subject: Re The very ethical Lonnie Landrud and what he knows about
> the Highway of Tears that the Human Rights Watch Bullshitters and Bob
> Paulson of the RCMP will never talk about
> To: hrwpress@hrw.org, "bob.paulson" <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "t.wilson" <t.wilson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "roger.l.brown"
> <roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Geoffrey.McDonald"
> <Geoffrey.McDonald@gov.bc.ca>, "Barry.Kennedy"
> <Barry.Kennedy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca"
> <ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca>, lgunter <lgunter@shaw.ca>, "joshua.skurnik"
> <joshua.skurnik@sunmedia.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
> "Davidc.Coon" <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>,
> "steve.graham" <steve.graham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "steve.murphy"
> <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, merv <merv@northwebpress.com>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, COCMoncton <COCMoncton@gmail.com>,
> "bruce.northrup" <bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
> "greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>, "suzanne.anton.mla"
> <suzanne.anton.mla@leg.bc.ca>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, frankffrost
> <frankffrost@hotmail.com>, radical <radical@radicalpress.com>,
> "jennifer.johnston" <jennifer.johnston@gov.bc.ca>
>
> One year ago the Human Rights Watch Bullshitters had Harper's knickers
> in a knot N'esy Pas?
>
> New York
> Press Desk
> Tel: +1-212-216-1832
> Fax: +1-212-736-1300
> Email: hrwpress@hrw.org
> Skype: hrwpress
>
> 2013-02-13 · OTTAWA - Prime Minister Stephen Harper is calling on the
> group Human Rights Watch to share information with police about
> allegations of abuse by RCMP
>
> http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2013/02/13/highway-of-tears-human-rights-watch-rcmp-rape_n_2675398.html
>
> Just so EVERYBODY knows Bobby Baby Paulson was a lowly Cpl in Prince
> Rupert when Lonnie Landrud witnessed Deena Lyn BRAEM's Murder
>
>
>
> 1995 -  as a Corporal in Prince Rupert, Paulson commented on the girls
> and women disappearing along Hwy  16 -
>
> “Obviously, we’re concerned that there is and we’ve done everything we
> can do to investigate accordingly,” Paulson said. “By the same token,
> it’s not a done deal that it is [a serial killer]. The possibility
> still exists that these are individual, separate incidents.”
>
> PURE BULLSHIT
>
> HOWEVER This is the one true statement that Paulson ever said about
> the Highway of tears
>
> "Paulson reportedly told officers “My message to you today is – don't
> worry about it, I've got your back.”
>
> http://www.hrw.org/news/2013/02/19/canada-rcmp-closes-ranks-abuse
>
> In an email late last week discussing the Human Rights Watch report on
> police mistreatment of indigenous women and girls in northern British
> Columbia, Paulson reportedly told officers “My message to you today is
> – don't worry about it, I've got your back.”
>
> “Commissioner Paulson’s dismissive approach sets precisely the wrong
> tone, and illustrates the challenges RCMP victims face,” said Meghan
> Rhoad, women’s rights researcher at Human Rights Watch. “His comments
> underscore the need for investigation of police abuse complaints by an
> independent civilian agency that won’t leap into organizational
> defense mode the moment police abuse is exposed.”
>
> Paulson further wrote that the RCMP has “tried to persuade [Human
> Rights Watch] to provide the names and specific details of these
> allegations in order that they can be investigated in accordance with
> our external investigation policy. If not to us then to any other
> investigative body. To date they have refused.”
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=26CrTLEVNvQ
>
>
> Deena Lyn BRAEM Murder of
> Quesnel RCMP Case No. 1999-7285
>
> http://www.unsolvedcanada.ca/index.php?topic=154.0
>
> http://www.hrw.org/news/2013/02/19/canada-rcmp-closes-ranks-abuse
>
> http://www.hrw.org/bios/meghan-rhoad
>
> http://www.hrw.org/reports/2013/02/13/those-who-take-us-away-0
>
> http://www.radicalpress.com/?m=201401
>
> Open Letter to the Federal & Provincial Honourable Members of
> Parliament from Lonnie Landrud
>
> To the Honourable Members:
>
> Stephen Harper, Prime Minister; Thomas Mulcair, Opposition Leader; Vic
> Toews, Federal Public Safety Minister; Rob Nicholson, Federal
> Solicitor General; Christy Clark, Premier of B.C.; Adrainne Dix,
> Leader, B.C. Opposition Party.
>
> I again find myself having to write to you the leaders of Canada and
> British Columbia to try and put a stop to the attempts on my life by a
> group of RCMP members and their paid informants.
>
> I have already sent letters to some of you Honourable Members and some
> of you I have never contacted. So I will repeat my situation to put
> everyone on the same page.
>
> I will start by stating I have contacted some of your Honourable
> predecessors before and was either ignored or told that the government
> operates separate from the RCMP and that they cannot interfere
> personally or by way of office s they have no mandate to do so.
>
> What I am asking is for someone outside the RCMP with the mandate to
> investigate the actions of all the RCMP members and their paid
> informants to do so.
>
> If there is no one with a mandate to physically collect evidence or
> interview witnesses, I ask that the laws be changed that gives someone
> office that can investigate outside the RCMP.
>
> I ask that this staff be given the rights and mandate to go back
> twenty-five years in order to look at all the relevant evidence. I
> have been stuck in this situation for over fourteen years personally
> however this has started way before then.
>
> If this cannot be done then I request a Public Inquiry into my
> accusations against the actions of the RCMP members involved.
>
> On January 19th, 2013 I had another attempt on my life. At this time I
> will not go into detail. I will state that this has been the eleventh
> of crimes committed against myself and my life in order to silence me.
> None of which have been investigated from outside the RCMP. Those of
> which that were investigated by the RCMP enabled them to tamper with
> evidence and they never interviewed me or my witnesses.
>
> I do know the more that these RCMP members do and fail the crazier that I
> sound.
>
> These police officers would like you to believe that I am delusional,
> however I ask for them to bring forth the evidence that can prove what
> I saw and what I have lived, wrong.
>
> The stress of this situation is incomprehensible. Then add the fact
> that the government’s mandate has left me reliving it over and over
> again in order to try to get our of this alive.
>
> Then add the fact the amount of numerous physical injuries I have
> incurred during these attempts on my life to silence me.
>
> I will continue by stating that not one of these injuries has been
> treated by a physician due to the fact that they do not want to
> testify in court, for one reason that it would cost them money. For
> the second reason that they are friends to some of these RCMP members
> involved. Some of these member’s wives are nurses.
>
> I will give one example of the many instances that left me feeling
> like my life is not worth a plugged nickel.
>
> I had gone to the emergency department at the local hospital and as I
> was having my temperature and blood pressure taken a Doctor Grapes
> walks over and picks up my medical records and starts to read and as
> he is doing this he looks at the nurse and states right in front of
> me. I quote: “Isn’t that funny, me and the other doctors have a bet on
> who gets to pronounce him dead.” I could not believe my ears. He then
> set down my file and walked out the door.
>
> I will expand on this by stating that the cop who tried to murder me
> in my hime and the one who I shot in the left arm with a 12 gauge shot
> gun loaded with #4 birdshot, his wife was a nurse here in Quesnel for
> years. She has worked with all these doctors and they all have seen my
> internet statement on YouTube. (Quesnel, RCMP, Corruption: The Lonnie
> Landrud Story – for those of you who haven’t seen or heard about it).
>
> I will continue by stating that I am sitll suffering Post Traumatic
> Stress Disorder (PTSD) and that I cannot even get treated because the
> RCMP have stated that this event never happened, nor any of the
> others. I for one know when I shot someone in my home and even if I
> were in my home alone the RCMP members cannot prove me wrong. That
> night they had to radio out on a public channel because their ghost
> channels do not work or their cell phones due to my property’s
> location. There are dozens of people who heard what was taking place
> and heard that Paul Collister was shot by me. There are a lot of
> scanners here in public hands that are monitored around the clock. I
> have spoken to some of these people. Perhaps someone should start to
> listen to the whole truth! Like I have stated in previous letters, if
> I could not prove my story I sure as hell would not be risking my
> life. The evidence can speak for itself. I can sure point to a lot of
> evidence, all’s I need is for someone outside the RCMP to investigate
> and to interview the people that I have spoken with.
>
> Now at this point some of you Honourable Members might want to send me
> to the RCMP Complaints Commission or the Independent Investigations
> Office of B.C. (IIOBC). I have already tried and neither one has the
> mandate to investigate this situation. The Complaints Commission only
> reviews paperwork put forth by the RCMP. The other’s mandate is to
> investigate only after September 12th, 2012. This is the date given by
> Shirley Bond, BC Solicitor General to the IIOBC and this was after the
> fact that she knew the situation that I have been trying to deal with
> (I have a letter from her that was handed to her by Kevin Falcon and
> the reply letter that she sent me). She too sent me to the Complaints
> Commission. Then she signed a twenty year deal with the RCMP shortly
> thereafter.
>
> There is not one thing that anyone of you Honourable Members can’t
> tell me to do that I have not tried. I have had five legal advocates
> and not one could do anything. I have contacted hundreds of lawyers
> and cannot find one to represent me. They are all scared to be
> victimized by the RCMP. I’ve been to the media and had the same
> outcome with then. I have also tried a private investigator and he too
> was threatened with obstruction of justice charges which would destroy
> his credibility. I have sent a letter to Wally Opal, Supreme Court
> Justice who was looking into the murdered and missing women by way of
> Public Inquiry. I received no reply at all.
>
> I have in my possession enough evidence to prove that I have No Legal
> Rights, No Civil Rights and No Human Rights in Canada.
>
> The reason being the RCMP are above the law and will be until they no
> longer investigate themselves.
>
> Now I would hazard to guess you’re asking why would I continue to
> expose myself to the danger that I face? My reply is these cops are
> not going to stop trying to murder me anyway so what do I have to
> lose? Then add the fact that I have survived this thus far. Unlike the
> thirteen people who have been murdered by these RCMP members and on
> top of all that the fifty girls that have came forward to the Human
> Rights watch dogs in Prince George, B.C., then you had better realize
> there is a lot more at stake than this. I’ve spoken to a few of them.
>
> There is no way in hell that I am going to sit back and let members of
> the RCMP murder people. Just like I am not going to let you Honourable
> Members hid behind your mandates and policies. Someone had better
> realize that I have nothing left to lose but I still have a means to
> expose this to the people of Canada and the world.
>
> Now I will tell you my story and I’m going to give the names of the
> RCMP members involved and expose what they have done to cover up the
> truth. I am not going to start with what led up to the first attempt
> on my life.
>
> I was house sitting for a friend’s mom when I witnessed the murder of
> Deena Lynn Bream by Paul Collister and Bev Hosker, both members of the
> Quesnel RCMP. But there was a paid informant, Dianne Fuccenecco there
> also.
>
> I phoned the Quesnel detachment of the RCMP however their night calls
> go to Prince George dispatch. I told them about the gun shots that I
> was hearing, eight in all. It sounded like a twelve gauge shot gun. I
> never gave my name. I was told that they would dispatch the police to
> the location (Sugar Loaf Ball Park in West Quesnel). The next morning
> I had a surveillance team in a trailer next door. It consisted of the
> following RCMP officers: Constable Gill, Constable Gruending,
> Constable Hughs, Constable Hosker and later on Constable Collister.
> These are the names that I was giving to Sgt. Norrise of the Kamloops
> RCMP the morning after I shot Constable Collister in my home.
>
> Unknown to me I was recorded and after the tape was tampered with was
> used in court and with the Complaints Commission when I filed a
> complaint. I can prove it was tampered with. I had a witness sitting
> right next to me when I spoke to Sgt. Norrise and what I wait was a
> lot different than the tape. What my witness suggested I tell them
> (which I did) does not even appear on the tape. There are also other
> discrepancies that appear on the tape.
>
> At the time I did not know the names of the members that, with
> Constable Collister, came to my property. They were Constable Kinloch
> and Constable Coutier (the ones on top of my house and the ones who
> pursued me across my landing). Constable Barkman, Constable McMillan,
> Constable Anderson, these were the police officers that I saw at my
> gate. Constable McMillan and Constable Anderson were the ones who
> hunted me in my field. This was the third attempt.
>
> The second attempt was a few months earlier in which Constable
> McMillan, Constable Rogas came to my friend’s home and arrested me for
> obstruction of justice. I committed no crime and had no idea why I was
> being arrested. I was severely beaten with a flashlight while in
> handcuffs and taken to the Quesnel detachment where Constable Paul
> Collister’s old partner Constable Sardinea tried to murder me with a
> pressure point attack that has not healed to this day.
>
> The attempts in between were by paid informants or police officers
> that I could not get a good look at. I can identify some of the paid
> informants.
>
> The eighth attempt was by Constable Ray Kinloch of the Quesnel RCMP.
> He came to my rural home and property. He was dressed in camouflage
> and wearing the same fur hat as the night that I shot Constable
> Collister.
>
> It was an hour and a half after dark and he had to travel two
> kilometres through the bush to be where he was at. I felt a direct
> threat to my life and I shot at his head and then heard him run
> through the bush and trip and fall. I left and went to my mom’s. When
> I returned a few days later I located where he tripped on a piece of
> blowdown and I found something that fell out of his pocket. I also
> have a witness to corroborate part of my story.
>
> The ninth attempt was by a paid informant. Again, severe injuries.
>
> The tenth attempt was by someone with a rifle with a silencer that
> tried to shoot me in the head in my own yard. As I stated to Christy
> Clark it was dumb luck that the bullet missed me. However I again did
> not escape injury.
>
> The eleventh attempt was on January 19th, 2013 when, after spending
> the night at my friend’s trailer (the same one I phoned the police
> from years earlier when I witnessed the murder), someone during the
> night tampered with my propane ignition system in my truck by taking a
> hose clamp off and pulling the hose off the intake to my engine and
> also pulling a plug wire off the front spark plug.
>
> My truck also runs on gasoline and I was using that until my trip
> home. When I changed over I was moving and had travelled a few miles
> before the truck exploded. If I had been sitting still I would not
> have survived. However I was moving and the explosion occurred beneath
> the truck lifting it off the ground. The result was a near fatal
> accident with a family of four including two children. They were
> passing me and travelling in the same direction and were right next to
> me at the time.
>
> I’m in a quandary and have no understanding as to why this situation
> has been allowed to continue. I have tried everything humanly possible
> to have this investigated from outside the RCMP. There is a lot more
> information and witnesses that I can expose but for now I feel like
> this should prove that this is no delusion.
>
> To the Honourable Christy Clark: Re: The letter that was your response
> after the tenth attempt on my life. Here is what happened after you
> suggested going to pro-bono law, Access to Justice. In late December
> 2012 I tried five times to contact them and leaving messages. I
> received no replies.
>
> I tried again in late January 2013 and spoke to someone. He stated
> that he was the office manager. He never gave his name. I explained my
> situation and what was taking place and what I have done. He suggested
> that I run. I told him that I had nowhere to go. He gave me a phone
> number and said that they could help me. It turned out to be a
> homeless shelter. So I phoned him back leaving him a message. He
> returned my call four days later. I explained to him that I did not
> need a shelter, that I needed a lawyer to give me legal advice. To
> this day I’ve had no legal advice!
>
> I again explained my situation. He stated that he was a lawyer and he
> could not help me. I requested that in writing. His reply was, “We get
> 10,000 calls a day and we do not have the time to write letters to
> everyone.” He went on to state that I should continue to deal with the
> Complaints Commission. This after I explained to him that I’ve been
> down that road before and they only review paperwork put forth by the
> RCMP. He went on again to state that I should run!
>
> A couple of days later I phoned the Complaints Commission to request
> the phone numbers of Bob Paulson, Head RCMP commissioner and Craig
> Cullen, Deputy Commissioner here in B.C. I spoke to a lady who stated
> she was a complaints commissioner and that I had no right to that
> information. That she, herself, could not contact them directly. She
> suggested that I try the RCMP website. I have no access to a computer.
> I however have had and the web sites that are connected to me are
> being stalked by the RCMP. I have exposed two such sites that have
> been created by the RCMP. I will also state that my mom’s phone has
> been tapped and after contacting Telus I was told that I have no right
> to that information.
>
> On January 19th 2013 I went to the Native Friendship Centre and spoke
> to Criss Dunlope who handles legal aid and explained my situation to
> her. She asked, “Why are you coming to me?” I told her that I needed a
> lawyer and legal advice. She said that she was not a lawyer and
> everything she could suggest I have already done. She went on to state
> that I should go underground because my situation will not change
> until the RCMP quit investigating themselves.
>
> On February 6th, 2013 I again phoned the RCMP Complaints Commission. I
> asked the receptionist that answered if the commission’s mandate has
> changed or do the RCMP still investigate themselves. She stated, “No,
> our mandate is still the same and the RCMP still investigate
> themselves.” I told her my situation and she said, “I will have an
> analyst phone me back.”
>
> I received a phone call twenty minutes later. It was a man’s voice who
> asked, “Now what the fuck do you want?”
>
> Now I am a logger and used to such belligerence until he continued by
> stating, “We have been down this road in 2005 and we will not deal
> with this any further you fucking asshole.” So I asked him, “Can I get
> that in writing?” He replied, “No, we have given you everything in
> writing we are going to give you!”
>
> So I asked, “So you’re telling me I have no rights. I just had someone
> try to blow me up after I was at a friend’s and some one tampered with
> my propane system.”
>
> He asked, “Did anyone see who did it?” I replied, “Well the only
> enemies that I have been dealing with are cops and they are the ones
> I’m trying to get investigated.” He said, “No, we cannot help you.” So
> I said, “So you’re telling me that you’re going to do nothing just
> like when I shot Constable Paul Collister? I mean it would have been
> really simple to subpoena the medical records of Collister.” I went on
> and said, “You know that I did shoot him in the left arm with a twelve
> gauge shotgun loaded with #4 birdshot! That he is still being treated
> for a blockage in his ulna.” I then added, “I could implicate him in
> as many as thirteen murders.” He then stated that they have done
> everything that they could and then told me again that I could go fuck
> myself.
>
> I understand why he treated me the way that he did. In my opinion he
> did an inadequate and inept job when asked for a review by the
> Complaints Commission. He went solely on the word of Sgt. Hildebrant
> who was Constable Collister’s cohort for years and then add the
> tampered-with tape.
>
> I mean, would you not ask for proof that Collister was not shot? How
> hard would it have been to ask for medical reports?
>
> It’s also my opinion that the Complaints Commission is just a cover-up
> organization for the RCMP and is a useless facet of our justice
> system.
>
> Something I do not understand is why do the RCMP have such control?
> They are just people like us.
>
> You know that I have been asked by lawyers why I was not dead yet and
> why are you trying to get us killed?
>
> I have also been told that I am a threat to national security by these
> same lawyers. I have always asked why? I’m just trying to deal with a
> system that has a crack in it that I’ve unknowingly fallen into. I’m
> just trying to stay alive. Is that too much to ask? I’ve had to relive
> this much too long.
>
> The stress and anxiety and the fear for my life, along with the
> physical injuries, has left me feeling like I’m being tortured to
> death.
>
> I ask all you Honourable Members what do I do, let them murder me? I
> have always stated to everyone that I may have to forfeit my life.
> That, I have always expected, but I ask you, am I not going to fight
> to defend my life?
>
> I mean I could go ballistic like the ex-L.A. police officer who was
> reported to have murdered other police officers. I can relate to some
> of the feelings but my no means can I understand why he did what he
> did. I believe there has been enough killing already. That is why I’m
> doing what I’m doing to prevent me from having to harm anyone. I have
> only asked for someone to investigate from outside the RCMP and I
> request to be put in protective custody till this is resolved. I also
> request medical treatment to see if my injuries can be treated.
>
> On the other hand, what do I do if you ignore my requests? Do I go to
> the United States and ask for asylum? These RCMP members are above the
> law and will not stop till I’m dead and there is no one who protects
> me from my supposed protectors. I always thought this was a free
> country to do what I want within the laws of Canada. Having to live in
> almost house arrest conditions for nine years has shown me that we
> live in a police state. I cannot even go to my own home, I have to
> live with my mother in order to feel any sort of safety and even then
> it’s very little. There has been no way out of this. I have tried
> everything.
>
> I ask the Honourable Christy Clark about your letter dated November
> 28th, 2012. You stated that you could not get personally involved. Yet
> you sent my letter to the Quesnel RCMP detachment to be investigated.
> Your actions exposed every piece of personal identification that I
> possess to the people who are trying to murder me. These RCMP members
> have a computer system called C.P.E.C. and now can track me where ever
> I go in Canada. I ask you, is that not overstepping your mandate and
> in doing so exposing me to further threat?
>
> The RCMP officer who phoned me on your behalf was police officer Ray
> Kinloch. He asked me to go in and make a statement. I refused. Reason
> one is for fear of my life and reason two is I’m not going to give him
> the evidence so it can be altered or go missing.
>
> I realize that by stating this I’m not making friends or allies and I
> do apologize if I’ve offended you. That was never my intention, ever.
> I wish that I did not have to involve any of you Honourable Members
> but what choice do I have? The truth is the truth and life is like
> that. I have only tried to deal with what’s been given to me.
>
> I believe that you are the people who look out for society’s best
> interests. These RCMP officers murdering people and investigating
> themselves is a threat to society is it not? You Honourable Members
> are our representatives by way of legal election. I’ve never voted for
> who would be members of the RCMP and I sure never put them in a
> position where they are above the law. This has resided in the
> policies that government has mandated since the time of confederation.
>
> I believe that this arcane system has done nothing to protect myself
> or anyone from being victimized by members of the RCMP and in doing so
> has left these same RCMP members unaccountable for any crimes that
> they choose to commit.
>
> I will state that if someone from outside the RCMP with a mandate to
> investigate the RCMP does investigate and I am found not to be telling
> the whole truth I would expect to be charged with obstruction of
> justice with the full knowledge of the maximum sentence that can
> brought down upon me. I fully expect to be held in compliance with
> Canadian law.
>
> I ask you Honourable Members if the I.I.O. office in Ontario can
> investigate the members of the B.C. RCMP. They have been mandated for
> a longer period of time. I however do not know if they can be
> interprovincial. They are a federal branch are they not? I have no way
> to contact them.
>
> Look. I am not trying to destroy the RCMP. I just believe that they
> should be held accountable. I also know that they are a valuable
> organization with a lot of good people who are a benefit to society’s
> safety. On the other hand there is a subculture within the RCMP that
> is a detriment to the safety of the Canadian public by being above the
> law and investigating themselves.
>
> Please do something. I cannot go on living in fear for my life when I
> know that the laws can be changed and I can feel free to live my life
> again.
>
> I do request a reply in writing from all you Honourable Members in
> regards to this matter.
>
> Thank you. God bless.
>
> Yours truly,
>
> Lonnie Gabriel Landrud
> April 24th, 2013
>
> FYI Frank Frost told me tonight that Lonnie Landrud amongst many
> others witnessed the CROWN prosecutor Geoffrey McDonald file HARD COPY
> of some of my documents into the PUBLIC RECORD of Frank Frost's matter
> in a fainthearted effort to make him appear to be crazy. However I had
> already kinda sorta figured it out byway of reading what the
> chickenshit neo nazi Arty Baby Topham had to say about it and hearing
> about the local cops in the Maritmes harassing my friends
>
> http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=4207
>
> "On Monday, February 3rd Frank Frost appeared in the Prince George
> Court House regarding an application which he had filed earlier
> demanding that his bail conditions be fully rescinded. When he arrived
> at the courthouse he had some additional evidence with him in his
> briefcase (which he affectionately refers to as his “Pandora’s Box”)
> that could prove to be a major blow to the guilty parties involved in
> his own arrest and the arrest of his partner Carrie Rupf. As well he
> was able to also present to the court another major case of federal
> government corruption with international repercussions that’s been
> held back for close to fifteen years now and is one that former
> federal Attorney General Ann McClellan had recommended police
> investigate years ago.
>
> Appearing before Judge Gray and flanked by Crown Prosecutor Geoff
> McDonald, Frank Frost proceeded to present his arguments and his
> evidence to the court, all of which was accepted. Crown Counsel
> McDonald attempted to persuade the judge that Mr. Frost ought to have
> a “mental evaluation” rather than be taken seriously by the court but
> the judge was not prepared to grant any order of that nature and
> allowed Frost to carry on with his arguments. Crown Counsel had good
> reason to try that last ditch attempt to stop Frank Frost which will
> become all too apparent to readers."
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 16:45:34 -0400
> Subject: Fwd: I called the offices of James Dinkins(DHS) and the law
> offices of Ben Ginsberg and Bobby Baurer (and several other very big
> wigs) first thing this morning just as I promised NONE of their
> assistants were helpful at all slome were quit nasty
> To: LindaMuller@buchanan.org
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 11:34:10 -0400
> Subject: I called the offices of James Dinkins(DHS) and the law
> offices of Ben Ginsberg and Bobby Baurer (and several other very big
> wigs) first thing this morning just as I promised NONE of their
> assistants were helpful at all slome were quit nasty
> To: ice.media@ice.dhs.gov, james.dinkins@dhs.gov,
> brian.vandenberg@usss.dhs.gov, Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> david.kris@usdoj.gov, lanny.breuer@usdoj.gov, neil.macbride@usdoj.gov,
> ogc@dhs.gov, Mark.Walton@usss.dhs.gov, CBPFOIA@dhs.gov,
> uscis.foia@dhs.gov, "bryan.vandenberg"
> <bryan.vandenberg@usss.dhs.gov>, foia@hq.dhs.govm,
> madeleine.dube@gnb.ca, john.parmley@usdoj.gov, peter.mazza@usdoj.gov,
> bill.nettles@usdoj.gov, wendy.olson@usdoj.gov, jess.bravin@wsj.com,
> kris.maher@wsj.com, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> chris.goodwin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, info@cisnb-srcnb.ca, Red Ice Creations
> <redicecreations@gmail.com>, mleger <mleger@stu.ca>, jwalker
> <jwalker@stu.ca>, plee <plee@stu.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
> andre <andre@jafaust.com>, COCMoncton <COCMoncton@gmail.com>,
> "roger.l.brown" <roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, birgittaj
> <birgittaj@althingi.is>, radical <radical@radicalpress.com>,
> "t.wilson" <t.wilson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Pete.Berndsen"
> <Pete.Berndsen@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Barry.Kennedy"
> <Barry.Kennedy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Claude.Tremblay"
> <Claude.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Cc: "foghorn.leghorn_175" <foghorn.leghorn_175@zoho.com>, David Amos
> <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "Geoffrey.McDonald"
> <Geoffrey.McDonald@gov.bc.ca>, "jennifer.johnston"
> <jennifer.johnston@gov.bc.ca>
>
> Go figure why lawyers and politicians must suffer so many jokes about
> their chosen professions EH?
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Rieta Ghosh <RietaG@chambersandpartners.co.uk>
> Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 15:09:46 -0000
> Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Detected as SPAM:  Fwd: RE My calls
> once again to the DHS and   the USSS tonight about the OIG Complaint #
> C04-01448
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I am out of the office, returning on Monday 6th January. I will
> respond to your query on my return.
>
> Please note: our offices are closed between 24th December and 1st January.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Rieta Ghosh
> Editor-in-Chief
>
> Chambers and Partners
> 39-41 Parker Street
> London
> WC2B 5PQ
> Direct Dial: +44 20 7778 1615
> Tel: +44 20 7606 8844
> Web: www.chambersandpartners.com
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 20:11:17 -0400
> Subject: RE My calls once again to the DHS and the USSS tonight about
> the OIG Complaint # C04-01448
> To: ice.media@ice.dhs.gov, james.dinkins@dhs.gov,
> brian.vandenberg@usss.dhs.gov, Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> david.kris@usdoj.gov, lanny.breuer@usdoj.gov, neil.macbride@usdoj.gov,
> ogc@dhs.gov, Mark.Walton@usss.dhs.gov, CBPFOIA@dhs.gov,
> uscis.foia@dhs.gov, "bryan.vandenberg"
> <bryan.vandenberg@usss.dhs.gov>, foia@hq.dhs.govm,
> madeleine.dube@gnb.ca, john.parmley@usdoj.gov, peter.mazza@usdoj.gov,
> bill.nettles@usdoj.gov, wendy.olson@usdoj.gov, jess.bravin@wsj.com,
> kris.maher@wsj.com, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> chris.goodwin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, info@cisnb-srcnb.ca, Red Ice Creations
> <redicecreations@gmail.com>, mleger <mleger@stu.ca>, jwalker
> <jwalker@stu.ca>, plee <plee@stu.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
> andre <andre@jafaust.com>, COCMoncton <COCMoncton@gmail.com>,
> "roger.l.brown" <roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, birgittaj
> <birgittaj@althingi.is>, radical <radical@radicalpress.com>,
> "t.wilson" <t.wilson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Pete.Berndsen"
> <Pete.Berndsen@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Barry.Kennedy"
> <Barry.Kennedy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Claude.Tremblay"
> <Claude.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>
> http://www.ice.gov/about/offices/homeland-security-investigations/
>
> James Dinkins
> james.dinkins@dhs.gov
> 202 732–5100
> ice.media@ice.dhs.gov
> 202 732 5200
>
> Executive Associate Director, Homeland Security Investigations
>
> James A. Dinkins is the executive associate director of Homeland
> Security Investigations (HSI) for U.S. Immigration and Customs
> Enforcement (ICE). ICE is the largest investigative arm of the U.S.
> Department of Homeland Security. HSI is comprised of more than 9,113
> employees, which includes more than 7,050 special agents who are
> assigned to 26 special agent in charge offices in major cities, 185
> other field offices throughout the United States, and 71 overseas
> locations in 47 countries. As the director, Mr. Dinkins has direct
> oversight of ICE's investigative and enforcement initiatives and
> operations targeting cross-border criminal organizations that exploit
> America's legitimate travel, trade, financial and immigration systems
> for their illicit purposes. This includes the investigation of
> financial crimes; bulk cash smuggling; narcotics smuggling and
> trafficking; human smuggling and trafficking; commercial trade, fraud
> and intellectual property right crimes; cyber crimes and the
> exploitation of children; immigration and document and benefit fraud;
> human rights violators; transnational gang activity; and weapons
> smuggling and export enforcement. To accomplish this mission, Mr.
> Dinkins administers a budget of more than $2 billion and is
> responsible for strategic planning, national policy implementation and
> the development and execution of all operational initiatives.
>
> Prior to assuming his current position, Mr. Dinkins held a number of
> key leadership positions within ICE, including special agent in charge
> for HSI Washington, D.C., acting director for the Office of
> Professional Responsibility, special agent in charge for HSI
> Baltimore, chief of ICE's Cornerstone and Financial Investigation
> Programs at ICE headquarters in Washington, D.C., assistant special
> agent in charge for HSI Michigan and Ohio and acting attaché for HSI
> Frankfurt.
>
> Mr. Dinkins began his law enforcement career as a co-op student with
> the U.S. Customs Service in 1986. In 1989, he became a special agent
> with the U.S. Customs Service office in San Francisco. In 1996, Mr.
> Dinkins transferred to the Detroit office where he was promoted to
> group supervisor and then assistant special agent in charge. In 2004,
> he was promoted to ICE headquarters and served as the ICE Cornerstone
> and Financial Investigation Programs chief where he was responsible
> for
>
> developing international and domestic initiatives designed to combat
> vulnerabilities in America's financial and trade sectors that could be
> exploited by terrorist or other criminal organizations.
>
> Mr. Dinkins holds a Bachelor of Science in criminal justice from the
> University of Detroit, where he graduated magna cum laude.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> To: <brian.vandenberg@usss.dhs.gov>; <Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Cc: "maritime_malaise" <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 9:41 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Perhaps Deputy Minister John Adams of the CSE should
> teach Wayne Boone and his professor pals how to read EH Rotten Ralphy?
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 11:08:28 -0400
> Subject: Fwd: Attn US Attorney B. Todd Jones I am on the phone to a
> person in your office who handles criminal matters after hours
> To: RietaG@chambersandpartners.co.uk
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 20:10:55 -0300
> Subject: Attn US Attorney B. Todd Jones I am on the phone to a person
> in your office who handles criminal matters after hours
> To: b.todd.jones@usdoj.gov, lanny.breuer@usdoj.gov,
> david.kris@usdoj.gov, "marie-claude.blais"
> <marie-claude.blais@gnb.ca>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, andremurraynow
> <andremurraynow@gmail.com>, "bernadine.chapman"
> <bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "john.warr"
> <john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "John.Williamson"
> <John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, "brian.t.macdonald"
> <brian.t.macdonald@gnb.ca>, "tom.smith" <tom.smith@ci.stpaul.mn.us>,
> jcarney <jcarney@carneybassil.com>, "Brian.Kelly"
> <Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>,
> "jason.kenney.c1" <jason.kenney.c1@parl.gc.ca>, ruby
> <ruby@rubyshiller.com>, rosent@math.toronto.edu, creeclayton77
> <creeclayton77@gmail.com>, ppalmater <ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca>,
> jrebick <jrebick@politics.ryerson.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <myson333@yahoo.com>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>,
> gplant <gplant@heenan.ca>, News10@newswithviews.com
>
> I must ask the obvious question do you snobby Yankee lawyers have any
> idea who wrote the Declaration of Human Rights for the UN and where he
> hailed from. I will give you a clue the same Riding I ran in in 2004
> after your former bosses tried to send me to Cuba after I beat fair
> and square un US District Mikey Sullivan another US Attorney who acted
> as the boss of the ATF until your lates boss Mr Obama got sworn in
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/07/attn-hey-chief-tom-smith-i-support-mr.html
>
> http://my.firedoglake.com/youmayberight/tag/universal-declaration-of-human-rights/
>
> http://www.justice.gov/usao/mn/meetattorney.html
>
> B. Todd Jones
> President Barack Obama formally nominated B. Todd Jones for the
> position of United States Attorney for the District of Minnesota on
> June 4, 2009, and he was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on August 7,
> 2009. United States Attorneys serve as the nation's principal
> litigators under the direction of the Attorney General, and each is
> the chief federal law enforcement officer of the United States within
> his or her particular jurisdiction. In September of 2011, Attorney
> General Eric Holder appointed Jones to serve as the Acting Director
> for the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.
>
> Prior to becoming U.S. Attorney, Jones was a partner with a major
> national law firm in Minneapolis, where his practice focused on
> complex business litigation. He has represented a number of
> organizations and individuals in both criminal and civil regulatory
> matters. Jones is a fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers.
> He also has served as special counsel to various boards of directors
> of public and privately held companies. In that capacity, he has led
> internal investigations and provided guidance on compliance and
> governance issues.
>
> This is the second time Jones has served as United States Attorney.
> President Clinton appointed him to the position in 1998 and he served
> in that capacity until January 2001. Jones also has served as an
> Assistant U.S. Attorney in the District of Minnesota. During his
> initial tenure as a federal prosecutor, Jones conducted grand jury
> investigations and was the lead trial lawyer in a number of federal
> prosecutions involving drug trafficking, financial fraud, firearms,
> and violent crime.
>
> Jones received his Juris Doctor from the University of Minnesota Law
> School in 1983. Following admission to the Minnesota bar, he went on
> active duty in the United States Marine Corps, where he served as both
> a trial defense counsel and prosecutor in a number of courts martial
> proceedings. In 1989, he and his family returned to Minnesota, where
> he developed a civil litigation practice encompassing a wide variety
> of legal matters, ranging from products liability defense and
> insurance coverage disputes to environmental and labor and employment
> controversies in both a private and public sector setting.
>
>
> http://www.justice.gov/usao/mn/contact.html
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 19:26:27 -0300
> Subject: I am on the phone to a person in your office who handles
> criminal matters after hours
> To: jeanne.cooney@usdoj.gov, "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Mackay.P" <Mackay.P@forces.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: campaign <campaign@rickperry.org>
> Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:12:44 -0500 (CDT)
> Subject: Re: Say hello to the "Gov" Ricky Baby Perry for me Howie You
> SOUTHERN Yankee bastards hang to far many innocent people to suit mean
> old me
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you for your message. This email address is not checked
> frequently. If your message is urgent and you need to speak with
> someone at the campaign, please call our offices at 512-478-3276.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 19:12:32 -0300
> Subject: Say hello to the "Gov" Ricky Baby Perry for me Howie You
> SOUTHERN Yankee bastards hang to far many innocent people to suit mean
> old me
> To: paul.paulos@ci.stpaul.mn.us, howie.padilla@ci.stpaul.mn.us,
> campaign@rickperry.org
> Cc: DAvid R Amos <davidr_amos@yahoo.ca>, "Jacques.Poitras"
> <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, newstips <newstips@cnn.com>
>
> Texans for Rick Perry
> 815-A Brazos Street, PMB 217
> Austin, TX 78701
>
> Phone:
>
> 512-478-3276
>
>
>> QSLS Politics
>> By Location Visit Detail
>> Visit 21,964
>> Domain Name swbell.net ? (Network)
>> IP Address 69.153.163.# (Texans For Rick Perry)
>> ISP SBC Internet Services
>> Location Continent : North America
>> Country : United States (Facts)
>> State : Texas
>> City : Austin
>> Lat/Long : 30.3037, -97.7696 (Map)
>> Language English (U.S.) en-us
>> Operating System Macintosh WinNT
>> Browser Safari 1.3
>> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko)
>> Chrome/12.0.742.122 Safari/534.30
>> Javascript version 1.5
>> Monitor Resolution : 1280 x 800
>> Color Depth : 32 bits
>> Time of Visit Aug 2 2011 8:14:13 pm
>> Last Page View Aug 2 2011 8:14:13 pm
>> Visit Length 0 seconds
>> Page Views 1
>> Referring URL
>> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
>> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
>> Out Click
>> Time Zone UTC-6:00
>> Visitor's Time Aug 2 2011 1:14:13 pm
>> Visit Number 21,964
>>
>> QSLS Politics
>> By Location Visit Detail
>> Visit 21,970
>> Domain Name state.tx.us ? (U.S.)
>> IP Address 204.65.226.# (STATE OF TEXAS GENERAL SERVICES COMMISSION)
>> ISP STATE OF TEXAS GENERAL SERVICES COMMISSION
>> Location Continent : North America
>> Country : United States (Facts)
>> State : Texas
>> City : Austin
>> Lat/Long : 30.3037, -97.7696 (Map)
>> Language English (U.S.) en-us
>> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
>> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
>> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0;
>> InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR
>> 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022; .NET CLR
>> 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
>> Javascript version 1.3
>> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
>> Color Depth : 32 bits
>> Time of Visit Aug 2 2011 10:04:07 pm
>> Last Page View Aug 2 2011 10:04:07 pm
>> Visit Length 0 seconds
>> Page Views 1
>> Referring URL http://www.google.co...wwWJrm94lCEqRmovPXJg
>> Search Engine google.com
>> Search Words david amos madoff
>> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
>> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
>> Out Click
>> Time Zone UTC-6:00
>> Visitor's Time Aug 2 2011 3:04:07 pm
>> Visit Number 21,970
>>
>> QSLS Politics
>> By Location Visit Detail
>> Visit 21,962
>> Domain Name senate.gov ? (U.S. Government)
>> IP Address 156.33.87.# (U.S. Senate Sergeant at Arms)
>> ISP U.S. Senate Sergeant at Arms
>> Location Continent : North America
>> Country : United States (Facts)
>> State : District of Columbia
>> City : Washington
>> Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
>> Language English (U.S.) en-us
>> Operating System Macintosh MacOSX
>> Browser Safari 1.3
>> Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_7; en-us)
>> AppleWebKit/533.21.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.5 Safari/533.21.1
>> Javascript version 1.5
>> Monitor Resolution : 2560 x 1440
>> Color Depth : 24 bits
>> Time of Visit Aug 2 2011 7:01:04 pm
>> Last Page View Aug 2 2011 7:01:04 pm
>> Visit Length 0 seconds
>> Page Views 1
>> Referring URL http://www.google.co...wwWJrm94lCEqRmovPXJg
>> Search Engine google.com
>> Search Words david amos madoff
>> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
>> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
>> Out Click
>> Time Zone UTC-5:00
>> Visitor's Time Aug 2 2011 1:01:04 pm
>> Visit Number 21,962
>
> http://o.canada.com/2013/07/17/mike-allen-mla-prostitution/
>
> Howie Padilla
> Public Information Coordinator
>
> Office: 651-266-5735
>
>  Before joining the Saint Paul Police Department as Public Information
> Coordinator for in August of 2011, he spent four years serving in
> communications roles at Saint Paul Public Schools. He also spent seven
> years reporting on Public Safety and Justice issues at the Star
> Tribune following graduation from the University of North Dakota where
> he majored in Communications.
>
>
> Sgt. Paul Paulos
> Public Information Officer
> Office: 651-266-5639
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 18:40:29 -0300
> Subject: Mr Campbell mett Mr Bauer say hello to Mr Obama lawyer and
> our Attorney general Mr Mackay for me will ya?
> To: paul.williams@ci.stpaul.mn.us, joe.campbell@ci.stpaul.mn.us,
> RBauer <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, Mackap <Mackap@parl.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <myson333@yahoo.com>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>,
> highwood <highwood@assembly.ab.ca>, "fortmcmurray.woodbuffalo"
> <fortmcmurray.woodbuffalo@assembly.ab.ca>
>
> Just so ya my Scottish ancestors told us to NEVER trust a poltician
> named Campbell
>
> Paul Williams
> Mayor's Staff
> Title: Deputy Mayor
> Phone: (651) 266-8569
>
>
>
> Joe Campbell
> Mayor's Staff
> Title: Director of Communications
> Phone: (651) 266-8518
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 20:49:59 -0400
> Subject: Attn Leslie Bory I just called from 902 800 0369
> To: LeslieBory@canadianschoice.com, Brian Ruhe <brian@brianruhe.ca>,
> paul <paul@paulfromm.com>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>
>
> Canadians' Choice Party Candidates Leslie Bory & Paul Fromm on Credit
> Creation & Free Speech Issues
> 129 views
> Brian Ruhe
> Published on Jul 5, 2018
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NSe7ApqhQ-Y
>
>
> http://www.canadianschoice.com/Brantford-Brant_Leslie-Bory.html
>
> LeslieBory@CanadiansChoice.Com
> Brantford, Ontario (CANADA)
> (905) 975-1209
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Seeds, Erin" <Erin.Seeds@justice.gc.ca>
> Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 12:39:15 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: ATT Guy Bujold RE The Commission for Public
> Complaints against RCMP - #2013-2824 Why did your people lie to me
> AGAIN yesterday?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I no longer work at Justice Canada. Please contact
> ATIP-AIPRP-JusticeCanada@justice.gc.ca<mailto:ATIP-AIPRP-JusticeCanada@justice.gc.ca>
>
> Je ne travaille plus à la Minsitère de la Justice. Veuilez contacter
> ATIP-AIPRP-JusticeCanada@justice.gc.ca<mailto:ATIP-AIPRP-JusticeCanada@justice.gc.ca>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 12:39:18 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: ATT Guy Bujold RE The Commission for Public
> Complaints against RCMP - #2013-2824 Why did your people lie to me
> AGAIN yesterday?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>
> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com
>
> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>
>
> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>
> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
> press releases.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 08:39:12 -0400
> Subject: ATT Guy Bujold RE The Commission for Public Complaints
> against RCMP - #2013-2824 Why did your people lie to me AGAIN
> yesterday?
> To: Guy.Bujold@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca, Lesley.McCoy@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca,
> Karen.Leibovici@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca, complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca,
> "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
> <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "Gunther.Schonfeldt"
> <Gunther.Schonfeldt@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca>, Newsroom
> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>, Whistleblower
> <Whistleblower@ctv.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "ian.mcphail"
> <ian.mcphail@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca>, "Kevin.leahy"
> <Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Stephen.Horsman"
> <Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca>, "Larry.Tremblay"
> <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, erin.seeds@justice.gc.ca, mcu
> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
> <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>, "bill.pentney"
> <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>,
> "david.hansen" <david.hansen@justice.gc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau"
> <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, lkelly <lkelly@nam.org>, ptolsdorf
> <ptolsdorf@nam.org>, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>,
> "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2018/07/ian-mcphail-chairman-of-civilian-review.html
>
> Thursday, 5 July 2018
>
> Ian McPhail, chairman of the Civilian Review and Complaints Commission
> for the RCMP, has left the post to resume his law practice
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: PCC Complaints  <complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 15:48:26 +0000
> Subject: RE: Re Call from 613 995 3466 Please view Pdf file hereto attached
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Cc: PCC Complaints
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of the documents you sent to this office
> and to advise you that I was unable to identify specific issues
> related to the conduct of an RCMP member.  I am, therefore, writing to
> clarify for you the mandate of the Commission for Public Complaints
> Against the RCMP.
>
> This Commission was established by Parliament to oversee the public
> policing activities of the RCMP.  Part VII of the Royal Canadian
> Mounted Police Act (“RCMP Act”) describes the mandate of this
> Commission.  Its mandate is to review “the conduct, in performance of
> any duty or function under the [RCMP] Act, of any member [of the RCMP]
> …”  Taken as a whole, the concerns outlined in your letter do not
> appear to qualify as conduct of the RCMP in the performance of a duty
> or function under the Act and, therefore, do not fall within this
> Commission’s mandate.
>
>
> As a result, this Commission has no role to play in resolving the
> issues you have raised in your letter.  Accordingly, we will be unable
> to process your concerns as a public complaint under Part VII of the
> RCMP Act.
>
> If your intention is to submit a complaint regarding the on-duty
> conduct of a member(s) of the RCMP, you will need to provide specific
> details, such as the date, time and city of each incident, names of
> the members you wish to complain about and the details of the improper
> conduct as it relates to each of them.
>
> You can do so through our online complaint form located at:
>
> http://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca/cnt/srv/mac/index-eng.aspx
>
> Alternatively, we can also be reached by:
>
> E-mail: complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
> Fax : 604-501-4095
> Telephone : 1-800-665-6878
>
> Sincerely,
> Tammy Wright
> A/Intake Officer / Agent d’Information de Liaison
> Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP | Commission des
> plaintes du public contre la GRC
> Tel/Tél : (604) 501-4080 | Fax/Téléc : (604) 501-4095
> complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
> Sent: July-17-14 11:50 AM
> To: general@oic-ci.gc.ca; ORG; MulcaT; leader; justin.trudeau.a1; pm;
> Mackap; steven.blaney
> Cc: david.hansen; David Amos; Marianne.Ryan; mclellana
> Subject: Fwd: Re Call from 613 995 3466 Please view Pdf file hereto
> attached
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos &lt;motomaniac333@gmail.com&gt;
> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 12:23:52 -0600
> Subject: Re: Re Call from 613 995 3466 Please view Pdf file hereto attached
> To: "Seeds, Erin" &lt;Erin.Seeds@justice.gc.ca&gt;
> Cc: David Amos &lt;david.raymond.amos@gmail.com&gt;
>
> Cya'll in Court then
>
> On 7/17/14, Seeds, Erin &lt;Erin.Seeds@justice.gc.ca&gt; wrote:
> &gt; Mr. Amos,
> &gt;
> &gt; I have no means of retaining these documents until you submit your
> request.
> &gt; You will see when you get to the website, that you can attach relevant
> &gt; documents to your request. Please do so at that time. Please also note
> that
> &gt; the Access to Information Office is only capable of providing records
> held
> &gt; at the Department of Justice. We have no investigative powers and while
> we
> &gt; do not dismiss your concerns, we have no means of taking action
> on them. Any
> &gt; documents you provide will be used only to better fulfill the Access
> to
> &gt; Information or Personal Information requests you submit them with.
> Below is
> &gt; a list of offices that may be better suited to investigate your
> concerns:
> &gt;
> &gt;
> &gt; Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
> &gt; 30 Victoria Street
> &gt; Gatineau, Quebec
> &gt; K1A 1H3
> &gt; Toll-free: 1-800-282-1376
> &gt;  Phone: (819) 994-5444
> &gt;  Fax: (819) 994-5424
> &gt; http://www.priv.gc.ca/cu-cn/index_e.asp
> &gt;
> &gt; Office of the Information Commissioner
> &gt; 30 Victoria Street
> &gt; Gatineau, Québec K1A 1H3
> &gt; Tel: 1-800-267-0441
> &gt; Fax: 819-994-1768
> &gt; For general enquiries e-mail: general@oic-ci.gc.ca
> &gt;
> &gt; Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP
> &gt;  National Intake Office
> &gt;  P.O. Box 88689
> &gt;  Surrey, BC V3W 0X1
> &gt; From anywhere in Canada: 1-800-665-6878
> &gt; org@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
> &gt;
> &gt; -----Original Message-----
> &gt; From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
> &gt; Sent: 2014-Jul-17 1:37 PM
> &gt; To: Seeds, Erin
> &gt; Cc: David Amos
> &gt; Subject: Re: Re Call from 613 995 3466 Please view Pdf file hereto
> attached
> &gt;
> &gt; Yes Please (I just called as well). I did not fill out a form yet
> &gt;
> &gt; However I have asked the various Justice Ministers on the phone and in
> &gt; writing about my files since Irwin Cotler had the job Not one soul has
> &gt; ever responded ethically until you did today. Thankyou for that
> &gt;
> &gt; Best regards
> &gt; Dave Raymond Amos
> &gt;
> &gt; On 7/17/14, Seeds, Erin &lt;Erin.Seeds@justice.gc.ca&gt; wrote:
> &gt;&gt; Thank you Mr. Amos. Do you want me to attach this to your personal
> &gt;&gt; information request? I haven't seen of your request yet; did you
> submit
> &gt;&gt; it
> &gt;&gt; to Justice on the website I mentioned?
> &gt;&gt;
> &gt;&gt;
> &gt;&gt; Erin Seeds
> &gt;&gt; Junior ATIP Analyst
> &gt;&gt; Jusctice Canada
> &gt;&gt; Phone: 613-941-4189
> &gt;&gt; erin.seeds@justice.gc.ca
> &gt;&gt;
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: PCC Complaints <complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:59:52 +0000
> Subject: The Commission for Public Complaints against RCMP - #2013-2824
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This is further to your recent communications with the Commission.
> From September 18, 2013 to the present, our office has received 6
> electronic messages from you. Many of these e-mails are not related to
> RCMP conduct.
>
> On October 1, 2013, you called our office and spoke with an Intake
> Officer.  You wished to enquire about three complaint files. When the
> Intake Officer attempted to inform you that you have three enquiry
> files with the Commission, you became agitated and insisted otherwise.
> You raised your voice and spoke over the Intake Officer.  You then
> demanded the name of the Intake Officer, and subsequently yelled "see
> you in federal court" and hung up the telephone line.
>
> As a reminder, we request that all future correspondence with our
> office must be courteous in tone and that you are respectful of the
> requests that are made of you.  While it is clearly not the intention
> of the Commission to prevent you from making complaints against
> members of the RCMP, your recent emails and telephone call have been
> unproductive for both you and for Commission staff.  In the future, we
> request that all communication with our office be respectful in
> language and related to our mandate.   In the event that this request
> is not respected, the Commission will consider imposing restrictions
> on how you may communicate with our office.
>
> Should you have a complaint about a specific RCMP member surrounding a
> specific incident, I invite you to visit the Commission's website
> (www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca<http://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca>) to submit an online
> complaint, rather than to send an email that is difficult to follow or
> a copy of a letter you have sent to many others. The complaint form
> will guide you through the information required that will enable the
> Commission to process your complaint. Should you have difficulty in
> accessing the complaint form and wish to have one sent to you, you may
> provide your mailing address and a form will be mailed to you via
> Canada Post.
>
> I would also invite you to send your correspondence regarding any new
> or existing complaints (quoting the appropriate Commission file
> number) by letter mail to:
>
> Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP
> National Intake Office
> PO Box 88689
> Surrey, BC  V3W 0X1
>
> Yours truly,
>
> Günther Schönfeldt
> Intake Officer / Agent d'information de liaison
> Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP /
> Commission des plaintes du public contre la Gendarmerie royale du Canada
> Tel/Tél : 1-800-665-6878 | Fax/Téléc : (604) 501-4095
> complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca<mailto:complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
>
>
> [Description: Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CCF6DA.65AE7FE0]
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: PCC Complaints &lt;complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca&gt;
> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 21:14:53 +0000
> Subject: RE: Oh my did theOffice of the Mayor of High River piss me
> off today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow? Say Hey to Ms Smith at the
> Townhall Meeting tonight for me will ya...
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" &lt;motomaniac333@gmail.com&gt;
>
> Hello Mr. Amos:
>
> This e-mail is to acknowledge your recent communication with our
> office about the RCMP.
>
> If you wish to submit a complaint regarding the on-duty conduct of a
> member(s) of the RCMP, you can do so through our online complaint form
> located at:
>
> https://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca/cnt/srv/mac/index-eng.aspx
>
> Alternatively, we can also be reached by:
>
> Telephone : 1-800-665-6878
> E-mail: complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
>
> Fax : 604-501-4095
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Günther Schönfeldt
>
> Intake Officer / Agent d'information de liaison
> Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP /
> Commission des plaintes du public contre la Gendarmerie royale du Canada
> Tel/Tél : 1-800-665-6878 | Fax/Téléc : (604) 501-4095
>
> complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)" <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 12:51:40 +0000
> Subject: RE: The LIEbranos latest Constitutional and Legal Adviser
> Michael Fenrick denied receiving this email but several computers did
> not
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick.  Please be
> assured  that your email will be reviewed.
>
> If this is a media request, please forward your email to
> media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>.  Thank you!
>
> *************************************
>
> Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
> Nouveau-Brunswick.  Soyez assuré(e) que votre  courriel sera examiné.
>
> Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à
> media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>.  Merci!
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Mr. Amos,
> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
> of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>
> Department of Justice
>
> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Good Day Sir
>>
>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>
>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>
>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>> suggested that you study closely.
>>
>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>>
>> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>>
>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>>
>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>>
>> April 3rd, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>>
>>
>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>>
>>
>> The only hearing thus far
>>
>> May 24th, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>>
>>
>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>
>> Date: 20151223
>>
>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>
>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>
>> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>
>> Plaintiff
>>
>> and
>>
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>> Defendant
>>
>> ORDER
>>
>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>> December 14, 2015)
>>
>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>> in its entirety.
>>
>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
>> he stated:
>>
>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>
>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>> Police.
>>
>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>
>>
>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
>> is no order as to costs.
>>
>> “B. Richard Bell”
>> Judge
>>
>>
>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>
>>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>
>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>> most
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>>
>> 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>
>> January 13, 2015
>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>
>> December 8, 2014
>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>
>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>> Stupid Justin Trudeau?
>>
>>
>> Vertias Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>
>> Subject:
>> Date: Tue, 3...

[Message clipped]  View entire message
 
 
 
 

Rick Igercich Joins The Conversation On The Gunn Show

8.81K subscribers
NFA President Rick Igercich Joins The Conversation On The Gunn Show Original source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQQLn...
 

72 Comments

 
 
 
 
 
 

Notice of meeting

Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security (SECU)
44th Parliament, 1st Session
 
Meeting 53
Thursday, December 8, 2022, 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
Webcast
 
Clause-by-Clause Consideration
Witnesses
Department of Justice
• Paula Clarke, Counsel, Criminal Law Policy Section
• Phaedra Glushek, Counsel, Criminal Law Policy Section
Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness
• Rachel Mainville-Dale, Acting Director General, Firearms Policy
Royal Canadian Mounted Police
• Rob Daly, Director, Strategic Policy, Canadian Firearms Program
• Murray Smith, Technical Specialist, Canadian Firearms Program
 
 
Clerk of the committee
Simon Larouche (613-944-5635)
 
 
 
 
Meeting No. 53 SECU - Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security
Location
Wellington Building - 425
Scheduled
Thursday, Dec 8, 2022
11:03 - 13:01
1 Hour 58 Minutes
Actual
Thursday, Dec 8, 2022
11:03 - 13:01
1 Hour 58 Minutes
Contact
Information
 
 
 

SECU Meeting 53: FIREARMS 101 (Liberals Learn About Guns)

56K subscribers
It felt like 'Day One' in your average firearms training or hunter safety course, as Liberal Taleeb Noormohamed ran out the clock asking question after question to Murray Smith in this session. 
 
𝐌𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐝𝐞𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐬: https://www.ourcommons.ca/DocumentVie... 
𝐆𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐬: 
Rob Daly, Director, Strategic Policy, Canadian Firearms Program 
Murray Smith, Technical Specialist, Canadian Firearms Program 
Marianne Breese, Public Safety Canada Legal Services 
Paula Clarke, Criminal Law Policy Section 
Phaedra Glushek, Criminal Law Policy Section 
Rachel Mainville-Dale, Acting Director General, Firearms Policy  
 
02:22 - Introductions 
04:16 - Taleeb Noormohamed  
01:58:28 - Closing discussion 
 

479 Comments

Methinks it is blatantly obvious that it is the LIEbranos who are practicing the not so fine art of filibustering N'esy Pas?
 
 
 
 

N.W.T. Premier Caroline Cochrane speaks with reporters in Ottawa – December 9, 2022

Northwest Territories Premier Caroline Cochrane speaks with reporters on Parliament Hill following her meeting with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. The meeting comes ahead of the federal government's launch of Canada's critical minerals strategy.
 
 
 
 
 

Even Some Liberals MP'S Are Not Happy

8.81K subscribers
Even Some Liberals MP'S Are Not Happy With The Gun Bill C-21 Question Period: December 7th 2022
Surprise Surprise Surprise
 
 

Automatic reply: I read the news up north today and called both offices of the Liberal MP Michael McLeod to remind him of the last email I sent him on All Hallows Eve

 

Fillmore, Andy - M.P.

<Andy.Fillmore@parl.gc.ca>
Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 6:46 PM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Hello, thank you for your email, this is an automated response confirming receipt.

 

Due to the high volume of correspondence we will prioritize responding to constituents in our riding of Halifax. Please reply to your original email with your postal code and we will reply as soon as possible.

 

Sincerely,

 

Office of Andy Fillmore

Member of Parliament for Halifax

 

 



Battiste, Jaime - M.P.

<Jaime.Battiste@parl.gc.ca>
Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 6:46 PM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting the office of Jaime Battiste, Member of Parliament for Sydney-Victoria.  

 

This inbox is currently receiving an extremely high volume of correspondence, and we will respond as soon as we can.  Priority will always be given to constituents in Sydney-Victoria.


To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include in your email:

 

·     Your full name;

·     Address and/or postal code;

·     Telephone number if necessary; and

·     The best time of day to reach you.

 

Depending on your issue, you may also find the answer to your question online.

 

·     For up-to-date information on COVID-19 in Canada, visit:

www.canada.ca/coronavirus

·     For Canada's economic response plan, including supports for individuals and businesses, visit:

https://www.canada.ca/en/department-finance/economic-response-plan.html


Thank you for reaching out,  

 

Office of Jaime Battiste 

Member of Parliament 

Sydney-Victoria 




Blois, Kody - M.P.

<Kody.Blois@parl.gc.ca>
Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 6:46 PM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>







Thank you for emailing my office, myself or one of my staff will get back to you as quickly as possible. 

Including a phone number to reach you at in your email would be greatly appreciated. 

 You can follow up on an email by calling one of the two offices.

 

 

If you are having trouble with government services please call and speak to the constituency office. 

The office is open but due to COVID-19 I would appreciate if you called ahead to make a scheduled visit.

 

Constituency Office: (902) 542-4010

Parliament Hill Office: (613) 995-8231

 

 

The Government of Canada has no jurisdiction over road maintenance, the Nova Scotia Health Authority, or forestry. For those concerns within provincial jurisdiction you will need contact your Nova Scotia MLA. 

Find yours at: https://enstools.electionsnovascotia.ca/edinfo2012/

 

 

For the full list of COVID-19 financial support please look at the comprehensive list at: 

https://canada.ca/coronavirus or use this Government tool: https://covid-benefits.alpha.canada.ca/en/start

 

 

Kody Blois

Member of Parliament

Kings–Hants



Fisher, Darren - M.P.

<Darren.Fisher@parl.gc.ca>
Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 6:46 PM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Hi there,

This is an automated email.

Please note that our office is receiving an extraordinary volume of correspondence.  Should you require assistance with a federal matter, we encourage you to call our office at 902-462-6453 and leave a detailed message.


**Priority is given to constituents of Dartmouth—Cole Harbour. If you currently live in our riding please reply to your original email with your address and phone number.**

Please note that although we take the time to review correspondence, due to email volume we are unable to respond to every email, however it will be noted.

Our office has a zero-tolerance policy for offensive language, harassment and threats.

Do you need emergency assistance while abroad?
Please also email
sos@international.gc.ca or call +1 613 996 8885 (call collect where available).

Take care,


Office of Darren Fisher, MP
Dartmouth-Cole Harbour
902-462-6453
DarrenFisher.ca



Fraser, Sean - M.P.

<Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>
Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 6:46 PM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contacting the constituency office of Sean Fraser. This is an automated reply.

 

Please note that this office is for matters related to Central Nova and cannot help with matters related to passports or IRCC if you live outside of Central Nova.

 

If you need help with a matter related to immigration, your respective Member of Parliament is the best source of information regarding your file. Your MP may contact IRCC on your behalf. If you are unsure who your Member of Parliament is, please use this link and input your postal code to find your MP: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en

 

To contact Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship please email Minister@cic.gc.ca

 

To inquire about the status of an immigration case, click here, or contact your local Member of Parliament for further assistance

 

If you would like to immigrate to Canada, please click here to learn more.  

 

If you are looking for an update on your passport, please click here or contact your Member of Parliament. This office does not have access to any system or database to provide a direct update for you.

 

If you would like to offer support for those fleeing the war in Ukraine please visit:

·       https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/immigrate-canada/ukraine-measures/help.html

·       www.ucc.ca

 

If you are looking to offer employment for those fleeing Ukraine please visit: https://www.jobbank.gc.ca/findajob/resources/jobsforukraine

 

If you are looking for information on Afghan refugees, you can find more information regarding the situation in Afghanistan here.

 

If you or a loved one are a Canadian citizen or PR currently in Afghanistan, contact Global Affairs Canada’s 24/7 Emergency Watch and Response Centre ASAP by phone (+1-613-996-8885), email (sos@international.gc.ca) or text (+1-613-686-3658).

Thank you.

Facebook: facebook.com/SeanFraserMP
Twitter:
@SeanFraserMP
Instagram:
SeanFraserMP

www.seanfrasermp.ca

Toll free: 1-844-641-5886

 

 

Merci d'avoir contacté le bureau de circonscription de Sean Fraser. Ce courriel est une réponse automatisée.

 

Veuillez noter que ce bureau s'occupe des questions relatives à Nova-Centre et ne peut pas vous aider pour les questions relatives aux passeports ou à l'IRCC si vous habitez à l'extérieur de Nova-Centre.

 

Si vous avez besoin d'aide pour une question liée à l'immigration, votre député respectif est la meilleure source d'information concernant votre dossier. Votre député peut contacter IRCC en votre nom. Si vous n'êtes pas sûr de savoir qui est votre député, veuillez utiliser ce lien et entrer votre code postal pour trouver votre député: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/fr

 

Pour contacter Immigration, Réfugiés et Citoyenneté, veuillez envoyer un courriel à Minister@cic.gc.ca

 

Pour vous renseigner sur l'état d’avancement d'un dossier d'immigration, cliquez ici ou contactez votre député local pour obtenir de l'aide.

 

Si vous souhaitez immigrer au Canada, veuillez cliquer ici pour en savoir plus.

 

Si vous cherchez une mise à jour sur votre passeport, veuillez cliquer ici ou contactez votre député. Ce bureau n'a accès à aucun système ou base de données pour vous fournir une mise à jour directe.

 

Si vous souhaitez offrir un soutien à ceux qui fuient la guerre en Ukraine, veuillez visiter :

·       https://www.canada.ca/fr/immigration-refugies-citoyennete/services/immigrer-canada/mesures-ukraine/aide.html

·       www.ucc.ca

 

Si vous cherchez à offrir un emploi aux personnes fuyant l'Ukraine, veuillez consulter le site: https://www.jobbank.gc.ca/findajob/resources/jobsforukraine

 

Si vous cherchez des informations sur les réfugiés afghans, vous pouvez trouver plus d'informations concernant la situation en Afghanistan ici.

 

Si vous ou un être cher êtes un citoyen canadien ou un RP actuellement en Afghanistan, contactez le Centre de veille et d'intervention d'urgence 24/7 d'Affaires mondiales Canada dès que possible par téléphone (+1-613-996-8885), par courriel (sos@international.gc.ca) ou par texto (+1-613-686-3658).

 

Merci.

 

Facebook : facebook.com/SeanFraserMP

Twitter : @SeanFraserMP

Instagram : SeanFraserMP

www.seanfrasermp.ca

Sans frais : 1-844-641-5886

 



Rogers, Churence - M.P.

<Churence.Rogers@parl.gc.ca>
Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 6:46 PM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting the office of Member of Parliament Churence Rogers.

If your inquiry relates to Bonavista-Burin-Trinity constituency matters or other matters related to MP Rogers' role as an MP, we will follow up as soon as possible. Please include your postal code.

If you have copied our office on general correspondence without a specific action for the MP, please consider this response as sufficient.

If you require immediate assistance or have not heard from us within 3 business days, please follow up with our office directly at 1-888-237-2455 between the hours of 9am to 5pm NL Time (or 7:30am - 3:30pm ET), Monday-Friday.


Thank You,

Office of Churence Rogers
Member of Parliament for Bonavista-Burin-Trinity
Centreville - 678-9026   | Clarenville - 466-6502  | Grand Bank - 832-1383



Kelloway, Mike - M.P.

<Mike.Kelloway@parl.gc.ca>
Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 6:46 PM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Hello,

 


This is an automated email. 

 

Hurricane Fiona: If you require assistance related to the impacts of Hurricane Fiona, please consult Disaster financial assistance - Government of Nova Scotia or call 2-1-1. 

 

Constituency Office: Our primary constituency office is located at:

 

Grand Lake Road Fire Hall Complex

850 Grand Lake Road

Sydney, NS

 


Please note, my office is receiving an extraordinary volume of correspondence. As such, response time may be longer than usual. Should you require immediate assistance, I suggest calling my office at 1 (866) 282-0699 and leaving a detailed message.

 

 

 **Priority is given to constituents of Cape Breton—Canso. Please reply to your original email with your address and phone number, and you will receive a response as soon as possible, if you live in the riding.**

 

Although we take the time to read every email, due to current volume my office will not be responding to generic form or mass emails.  However, all concerns are still noted and I appreciate you taking the time to reach out.

 

 

Be well,

 

 

Mike Kelloway

Member of Parliament

Cape Breton–Canso

 

 

 

To receive updates on Federal news, programs, funding opportunities and more please click here.


Constituency Office
850 Grand Lake Road, Sydney, N.S.
Toll-free: 1-866-282-0699

Facebook: 
facebook.com/MikeKellowayMP/
Twitter: @MikeKelloway
Instagram: @MikeKellowayMP

 
 
 
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Berthold, Luc - Député" <Luc.Berthold@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 22:46:20 +0000
Subject: RE: I read the news up north today and called both offices of
the Liberal MP Michael McLeod to remind him of the last email I sent
him on All Hallows Eve
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

(English follows)

Bonjour,

Je vous remercie de m’avoir fait parvenir votre message. Vos
commentaires sont importants pour moi, afin de bien comprendre les
enjeux qui sont importants pour les gens de Mégantic-l’Érable et du
Canada.

Soyez assuré que j’en prendrai connaissance dans les plus brefs délais.
Si nécessaire, moi, ou un membre de mon équipe, allons communiquer avec vous.

Je vous remercie d’avoir pris le temps de m’écrire.

------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------

Hello,

Thank you for sending me your message. Your comments are important to
me, in order to fully understand the issues that are important to the
people of Mégantic-Érable and of Canada.

Rest assured that I will read them as soon as possible.

If necessary, I, or a member of my team, will contact you.

Thank you for taking the time to write to me.



[cid:image001.png@01D84DBF.311212F0]
Luc Berthold
Député de Mégantic-L‘Érable
Leader parlementaire adjoint à la Chambre de l’Opposition officielle
Deputy House Leader of the Official Opposition

Bureau Ottawa | 613-995-1377
Bureau circonscription | 1-866-770-2903
Courriel | luc.berthold@parl.gc.ca<mailto:luc.berthold@parl.gc.ca>


---------- Original message ----------
From: keepcanada <keepcanada@protonmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2022 22:44:34 +0000
Subject: Auto: I read the news up north today and called both offices
of the Liberal MP Michael McLeod to remind him of the last email I
sent him on All Hallows Eve
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Your amazing Canada, thank you so much. We have added this link to
organize helpers! If you are wanting to help please fill out a form so
we can delegate loglogistic and location!! Freedom together !
http://register.adopt-a-trucker.ca/

Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.


---------- Original message ----------
From: "kelly@kellyregan.ca" <kelly@kellyregan.ca>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2022 23:44:30 +0100
Subject: Auto Reply
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

[This is an auto reply]

Thank you for contacting the constituency office of the Hon. Kelly
Regan, MLA for Bedford Basin.  This office is here to assist residents
of the Bedford community.

In order to ensure a proper and timely response to your matter, please
include all necessary contact information in your correspondence,
including your name, address, phone number/e-mail, and the nature of
your matter.

This constituency office is a respectful workplace.  Please be advised
that we are unable to respond to communications involving profanity,
personal attacks,  racism, homophobia, or other forms of
discrimination.

Thank you and have a great day.


Traci Sullivan
Constituency Assistant
Office of the Honourable Kelly Regan | MLA, Bedford Basin
 902-407-3777 |  902-407-3779  | www.kellyregan.ca  |  1550 Bedford
Highway | Suite 555 | Bedford, NS B4A 1E6



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 18:44:28 -0400
Subject: I read the news up north today and called both offices of the
Liberal MP Michael McLeod to remind him of the last email I sent him
on All Hallows Eve
To: justin.trudeau@parl.gc.ca, David.Yurdiga@parl.gc.ca,
Michael.Kram@parl.gc.ca, Luc.Berthold@parl.gc.ca,
Bernard.Genereux@parl.gc.ca, Joel.Godin@parl.gc.ca,
jacques.gourde@parl.gc.ca, Richard.Lehoux@parl.gc.ca,
info@peoplespartyofcanada.ca, Richard.Martel@parl.gc.ca,
Pierre.Paul-Hus@parl.gc.ca, Alain.Rayes@parl.gc.ca,
mrisdon@westernstandardonline.com, jrath@rathandcompany.com,
lettertoeditor@epochtimes.com, newsdesk@epochtimes.com,
ottawa@epochtimes.com, calgary.ca@epochtimes.com,
wendy.tiong@epochtimes.com, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, jbosnitch
<jbosnitch@gmail.com>, "darrow.macintyre" <darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>,
newsroom@ntdtv.com, feedback@ntdtv.com, jenny.chang@ntdtv.com,
joe.wang@ntdtv.com, bgrant@thehill.com, nacharya
<nacharya@thehill.com>, Peggy.Regimbal@bellmedia.ca,
patrickking@canada-unity.com, james@canada-unity.com,
novaxpass@outlook.com, martin@canada-unity.com, tdundas10@gmail.com,
jlaface@gmail.com, davesteenburg269@gmail.com, brown_tm3@yahoo.ca,
leannemb <leannemb@protonmail.com>, harold@jonkertrucking.com,
keepcanada@protonmail.com, andyjohanna01@hotmail.com,
janiebpelchat@icloud.com, janetseto@protonmail.com,
johndoppenberg@icloud.com, stiessen1979@gmail.com,
77cordoba@outlook.com, pierrette.ringuette@sen.parl.gc.ca,
Patrick.Brazeau@sen.parl.gc.ca, george.furey@sen.parl.gc.ca,
larry.campbell@sen.parl.gc.ca, Bev.Busson@sen.parl.gc.ca,
info@lionelmedia.com, liveneedtoknow@gmail.com, tips@steeltruth.com,
media@steeltruth.com, press@deepcapture.com, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, bbachrach <bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>,
"Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey"
<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
Norman Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>, news <news@dailygleaner.com>,
nobyrne <nobyrne@unb.ca>, tracy@uncoverdc.com, James@jamesfetzer.com,
editor@americanthinker.com, nharris@maverick-media.ca, nouvelle
<nouvelle@acadienouvelle.com>, news-tips <news-tips@nytimes.com>,
danajmetcalfe@icloud.com, lauralynnlive@protonmail.com,
rglangille@gmail.com, paulpalango <paulpalango@protonmail.com>,
NightTimePodcast <NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>, nsinvestigators
<nsinvestigators@gmail.com>, editor@ssimicro.com, inuvikdrum@nnsl.com,
kivalliqnews@nnsl.com, editor@nunavutnews.com
Cc: Jaime.Battiste@parl.gc.ca, Kody.Blois@parl.gc.ca,
Andy.Fillmore@parl.gc.ca, motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
Darren.Fisher@parl.gc.ca, Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca,
Bernadette.Jordan@parl.gc.ca, Mike.Kelloway@parl.gc.ca,
Darrell.Samson@parl.gc.ca, Lenore.Zann@parl.gc.ca, "heather.bradley"
<heather.bradley@parl.gc.ca>, geoff.regan@parl.gc.ca,
kelly@kellyregan.ca, Michael.Duffy@sen.parl.gc.ca,
Sean.Casey@parl.gc.ca, Robert.Morrissey@parl.gc.ca,
lawrence.macaulay@parl.gc.ca, "Furey, John" <jfurey@nbpower.com>,
wharrison <wharrison@nbpower.com>, "Mike.Comeau" <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>,
"Holland, Mike (LEG)" <mike.holland@gnb.ca>,
Gudie.Hutchings@parl.gc.ca, Yvonne.Jones@parl.gc.ca,
Ken.McDonald@parl.gc.ca, Seamus.ORegan@parl.gc.ca,
Churence.Rogers@parl.gc.ca, scott.simms@parl.gc.ca,
Jim.Carr@parl.gc.ca, Dan.Vandal@parl.gc.ca,
kevin.lamoureux@parl.gc.ca, Terry.Duguid@parl.gc.ca,
Larry.Bagnell@parl.gc.ca, Michael.McLeod@parl.gc.ca
 
 
 
 

NWT MP says Bill C-21 must not impede rights of Northern hunters

 
by NNSL Media December 7, 2022   
 
“There are aspects of (the bill) right now that are a bit blurry for me and a little bit concerning,” says Northwest Territories Member of Parliament Michael McLeod. NNSL file photo
“There are aspects of (the bill) right now that are a bit blurry for me and a little bit concerning,” says Northwest Territories Member of Parliament Michael McLeod. NNSL file photo

“There are aspects of (the bill) right now that are a bit blurry for me and a little bit concerning,” says Northwest Territories Member of Parliament Michael McLeod. NNSL file photo

The federal government’s proposed legislation that aims in part to prohibit hundreds of previously legal firearms may be called for a final vote as soon as this month, but NWT MP Michael McLeod says he is not yet satisfied with the bill in its current form.

McLeod, a member of the governing Liberal party, said he has long supported his party’s effort to toughen gun laws since being elected in 2015 and pointed out that he likes some provisions of the current draft of Bill C-21. Aspects he approves of include red and yellow flag laws that would allow court-order prohibitions, handgun freezes, attention to illegal smuggling and trafficking and stiffer maximum penalties for gun crimes.

However, he said definitions need to be clearer around what constitutes “military-style assault weapons” and there needs to be a better understanding as to why there are some non-semi-automatic guns on the prohibition list.

He added that Public Safety Canada needs to better acknowledge common gun use in the North and should improve consultation with Northerners before a vote is held, particularly Indigenous people, as per Section 35 of the Constitution, the United Nations Declaration of Indigenous Peoples and specific self-governing agreements.

“There are aspects of (the bill) right now that are a bit blurry for me and a little bit concerning,” he said. “I don’t know what is being suggested when it comes to changing the definition of assault weapons.

“I have spoken to the minister in charge, (Public Safety Minister) Marco Mendicino, and I’ve indicated to him that he doesn’t have my full support until I really understand this and until I’m completely convinced (the bill) won’t affect hunters, sport shooters and trappers in the North.

“I have also indicated that I’m not satisfied that his people have done a good enough job to consult.”

‘Heated debate’

McLeod admitted he has a personal interest in the issue as he has been a longtime collector of firearms, so he considers himself well versed in the need for specifics when placing prohibitions on guns.

“There are already some guns that are not semi-automatics that are on the list and we need to know why,” he said. “Most of them are because they exceed the 10,000 joule (projectile limit) but we are trying to scrub the list to make sure that nothing gets on that list that people are using for hunting in the North.”

Because of his experience and perspective, there can be “heated” debate within his own party, he said.

“A lot of times when we have discussions within caucus, I’m the one with the most guns and probably the one with the most knowledge about guns,” he said. “We have a large part of the MPs in caucus that… see guns from a city/urban standpoint and look at it through that lens. But there are lots from the rural or remote and northern parts of the country that look at guns and view it in a different light.

“We don’t see it as a weapon but we see it as a tool.”

Raquel Dancho, Conservative MP and vice-chair of the House of Commons public safety and national security committee that has been examining the bill, said her party has been opposed to the bill from the beginning. However, her opposition became stronger in recent weeks as the government attempted during clause-by-clause reading in committee to add non-restricted hunting rifles among those proposed to be prohibited and to redefine a ‘military assault rifle’ with any semi-automatic gun with the capacity to carry a magazine.

She has called the move “the largest assault on hunters in Canada” and has charged that the federal government is going after “Grandpa Joe’s hunting rifle instead of gangsters in Toronto.”

“The problem with that of course is that (the proposed bill) encapsulates hundreds and hundreds of models of common firearms and shotguns used for duck hunting or farming,” she said.

“Trudeau has been consistent in saying that he will never come for hunters and now they are.

“If this legislation stands, it leaves a backdoor open that any listed hunting rifle can be banned with the stroke of a pen.”

‘Hammered’ with emails

Dancho said that having a voice from provincial or territorial leadership against the legislation — as Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta have done — could make a difference in presenting a stance against the bill.

“I would also empower every voter who would like to see hunting remain in Canada to reach out to the Liberal MP ASAP,” she said. “MPs are currently getting hammered with thousands of emails on this.”

For his part, McLeod said he has received both support and opposition to the bill and that he situates himself somewhere in the middle.

Scott Cairns, past president of the Yellowknife Shooting Club, said he’s concerned that the bill amendments will likely lead to many club members owning prohibited guns due to the popular use of non-restricted, semi-automatic guns. Often these firearms are beneficial to hunters wanting to get shots off quickly when ducks or geese come into sight or when trying to quickly take down larger game like deer or caribou.

“Because of the type of gun, the semi-automatic and the fact that they are extra popular among users makes this a very sweeping prohibition,” he explained.

“What the federal government is now saying with this law is that they are taking firearms that were bought over the counter for normal use and by the stroke of a pen saying that you are not allowed to sell, use or trade away. It is not acceptable to me and should not be acceptable to anyone.”

Possession acquisition licence

Cairns said that legal firearm owners already go through a rigorous and invasive procedure to be able to possess in the first place, which is among the opposition by gun owners regarding the proposed bill.

To legally own a gun in the Northwest Territories, one must seek out a Possession acquisition licence (PAL) by first paying a $300 fee and then taking a Canada Firearm Safety course led by a credible instructor.

Once passing the course, one must fill out a five-page application form to send to the RCMP.

Before a permit can be issued, the RCMP thoroughly researches an applicant’s history, which can include marital and mental health history and criminal record backgrounds.

After contact with references, a non-restricted firearm licence may then be issued.

GNWT Department of Justice spokesperson Ngan Trinh said this week that the territorial government is reviewing recent amendments to the bill but admitted that questions remain surrounding the proposed legislation, including on how proposed buyback program would work.

“Community safety and crime reduction is a shared responsibility with the federal government and we will work with our partners including Public Safety Canada and the RCMP to assess any implications from the ban,” Trinh said.

Messages for this story were left with Justice Minister R.J. Simpson and cabinet as well as the Northwest Territories RCMP on Dec. 1. They did not respond by press deadline.

—By Simon Whitehouse, Northern News Services 
 

Our publishing company, Northern News Services Limited and our affiliated company, Canarctic Graphics Limited, a full-service printer have offices in Nunavut and Northwest Territories.


Publisher: Mike W. Bryant
Print Shop Manager: Sean Crowell

Managing Editor: James McCarthy
Circulation Director: Edison Mathew


ALL DEPARTMENTS/ALL PAPERS
P.O.Box 2820
Yellowknife NT X1A 2R1
Phone (867) 873-4031
Fax (867) 873-8507

BUREAUS:

Nunavut News – Reporter Trevor Wright
Phone – 1-867-979-5990
Email: editor@nunavutnews.com

Nunavut News Advertising & Print Sales: Laura Whittle
Email: advertising@nunavutnews.com
Phone: (867) 766-8260
Fax: (867) 873-8507

Kivalliq News Editor: Stewart Burnett
Phone: (867) 645-3223
Fax: (867) 645-3225
Email: kivalliqnews@nnsl.com

Inuvik Drum, Mackenzie Delta, NT (Reporter): Eric Bowling
Ph.(867) 777- 4545
Fax (867) 777-4412
Email: inuvikdrum@nnsl.com

Hay River Hub, NT (Reporter): Ezra Black
Ph.(867) 874-2802
Fax (867) 874-2804

Email:advertise@hayriverhub.com
Email: editor@ssimicro.com


Canarctic Graphics Limited
P.O. Box 2758
Yellowknife, NT X1A 2R1
Ph. (867) 873-4371
Fax (867) 920-4371

 

 
 
 

firearm Prohibition

29.6K subscribers
Info Description Meeting No. 52 SECU - Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security Location Wellington Building - 425 Scheduled Tuesday, Dec 6, 2022 15:33 - 17:30 1 Hour 57 Minutes
 
Actual https://parlvu.parl.gc.ca/Harmony/en/... Tuesday, Dec 6, 2022 15:33 - 17:30 1 Hour 57 Minutes Contact Information parlvusupport@parl.gc.ca Information website 
 
Fair dealing recognizes that certain uses of copyright protected works are beneficial for society. By placing limits on instances where copyright owners can require payment, fair dealing leads innovation, to the creation of new works and new scholarship. The Supreme Court of Canada increasingly refers to copyright as providing a balance between the rights of users and of copyright owners. Fair dealing has a large, positive impact, including for: Educators and students at all levels, Creative professionals (journalists, authors, filmmakers, musicians, etc.), Individuals who want to use, copy or share portions of copyright protected works in their daily lives.
Methinks everybody knows why I love this circus N'esy Pas?
 
 
 
 
 

right of self defense in Canada

29.6K subscribers
Info Description Meeting No. 51 SECU - Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security Location Wellington Building - 425 Scheduled Thursday, Dec 1, 2022 11:03 - 13:04
 
Thursday, Dec 1, 2022 11:03 - 13:04 2 Hours 
 
Contact Information parlvusupport@parl.gc.ca Information website 
 
Does fair use exist in Canada? 
 
The Canadian Copyright Act allows the use of material from a copyright protected work (literature, musical scores, audiovisual works, etc.) without permission when certain conditions are met. People can use fair dealing for research, private study, education, parody, satire, criticism, review, and news reporting.
 
 
 

Notice of meeting Amended

Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security (SECU)
44th Parliament, 1st Session
 
Meeting 51
Thursday, December 1, 2022, 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
Webcast
 
Clause-by-Clause Consideration
WitnessesAmended
Department of Justice
• Marianne Breese, Counsel, Public Safety Canada Legal Services
• Paula Clarke, Counsel, Criminal Law Policy Section
• Phaedra Glushek, Counsel, Criminal Law Policy Section
Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness
• Rachel Mainville-Dale, Acting Director General, Firearms Policy
Amended Section
Royal Canadian Mounted Police
• Rob Daly, Director, Strategic Policy, Canadian Firearms Program
• Murray Smith, Technical Specialist, Canadian Firearms Program
 
 
Clerk of the committee
Simon Larouche (613-944-5635)
 


---------- Original message ----------
From: ~Public Safety and National Security/Sécurité publique et
nationale <SECU@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 21:18:43 +0000
Subject: RE: Attn Simon Larouche (613-944-5635) I just called
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, ~Public Safety and
National Security/Sécurité publique et nationale <SECU@parl.gc.ca>

Hello Sir,

Here is a list of the MPs who attended SECU meeting on December 1, 2022:

Paul Chiang
Ron McKinnon
Taleeb Noormohamed
Peter Schiefke
Tony Van Bynen
Raquel Dancho
Dane Lloyd
Glen Motz
Doug Shipley
Kristina Michaud
Blaine Calkins
Leah Gazan
Heather McPherson
Randeep Sarai
Bon Zimmer
Alex Ruff

Thank you,

Simon Larouche
Greffier du Comité permanent de la sécurité publique et nationale
Clerk of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security
Committees and Legislative Services Directorate | Direction des
comités et des services législatifs
House of Commons | Chambre des communes
131 Queen Street | 131, rue Queen
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6
SECU@parl.gc.ca
Tel. | Tél. : 613-944-5635
Latest Committee tweets at #SECU | Derniers gazouillis du Comité au #SECU
Follow us | Suivez-nous


-----Message d'origine-----
De : David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Envoyé : 7 décembre 2022 15:45
À : ~Public Safety and National Security/Sécurité publique et
nationale <SECU@parl.gc.ca>
Cc : motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Objet : Attn Simon Larouche (613-944-5635) I just called

44th Parliament, 1st Session (November 22, 2021 - Present) Contact the
Committee Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security
Sixth Floor, 131 Queen Street House of Commons Ottawa ON K1A 0A6
Canada
E-mail: SECU@parl.gc.ca
Fax: 613-947-3089
Website: ourcommons.ca/SECU-e
Committee Staff
Simon Larouche, Clerk of the committee
613-944-5635
Pascaline Yayi, Committee Assistant
Allison Goody, Analyst
Library of Parliament
Lyne Casavant, Analyst
Library of Parliament

Methinks the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security are gonna have a Hell of a hearing on All Hallows Eve N'esy Pas?

David Amos

<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 1:16 PM
To: justin.trudeau@parl.gc.ca, David.Yurdiga@parl.gc.ca, Michael.Kram@parl.gc.ca, Luc.Berthold@parl.gc.ca, Bernard.Genereux@parl.gc.ca, Joel.Godin@parl.gc.ca, jacques.gourde@parl.gc.ca, Richard.Lehoux@parl.gc.ca, info@peoplespartyofcanada.ca, Richard.Martel@parl.gc.ca, Pierre.Paul-Hus@parl.gc.ca, Alain.Rayes@parl.gc.ca, mrisdon@westernstandardonline.com, jrath@rathandcompany.com, lettertoeditor@epochtimes.com, newsdesk@epochtimes.com, ottawa@epochtimes.com, calgary.ca@epochtimes.com, wendy.tiong@epochtimes.com, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, "darrow.macintyre" <darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, newsroom@ntdtv.com, feedback@ntdtv.com, jenny.chang@ntdtv.com, joe.wang@ntdtv.com, bgrant@thehill.com, nacharya <nacharya@thehill.com>, Peggy.Regimbal@bellmedia.ca, patrickking@canada-unity.com, james@canada-unity.com, novaxpass@outlook.com, martin@canada-unity.com, tdundas10@gmail.com, jlaface@gmail.com, davesteenburg269@gmail.com, brown_tm3@yahoo.ca, leannemb <leannemb@protonmail.com>, harold@jonkertrucking.com, keepcanada@protonmail.com, andyjohanna01@hotmail.com, janiebpelchat@icloud.com, janetseto@protonmail.com, johndoppenberg@icloud.com, stiessen1979@gmail.com, 77cordoba@outlook.com, pierrette.ringuette@sen.parl.gc.ca, Patrick.Brazeau@sen.parl.gc.ca, george.furey@sen.parl.gc.ca, larry.campbell@sen.parl.gc.ca, Bev.Busson@sen.parl.gc.ca, info@lionelmedia.com, liveneedtoknow@gmail.com, tips@steeltruth.com, media@steeltruth.com, press@deepcapture.com, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, bbachrach <bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Norman Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>, news <news@dailygleaner.com>, nobyrne <nobyrne@unb.ca>, tracy@uncoverdc.com, James@jamesfetzer.com, editor@americanthinker.com, nharris@maverick-media.ca, nouvelle <nouvelle@acadienouvelle.com>, news-tips <news-tips@nytimes.com>, danajmetcalfe@icloud.com, lauralynnlive@protonmail.com, rglangille@gmail.com, paulpalango <paulpalango@protonmail.com>, NightTimePodcast <NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>, nsinvestigators <nsinvestigators@gmail.com>
Cc: Jaime.Battiste@parl.gc.ca, Kody.Blois@parl.gc.ca, Andy.Fillmore@parl.gc.ca, motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Darren.Fisher@parl.gc.ca, Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca, Bernadette.Jordan@parl.gc.ca, Mike.Kelloway@parl.gc.ca, Darrell.Samson@parl.gc.ca, Lenore.Zann@parl.gc.ca, "heather.bradley" <heather.bradley@parl.gc.ca>, geoff.regan@parl.gc.ca, kelly@kellyregan.ca, Michael.Duffy@sen.parl.gc.ca, Sean.Casey@parl.gc.ca, Robert.Morrissey@parl.gc.ca, lawrence.macaulay@parl.gc.ca, "Furey, John" <jfurey@nbpower.com>, wharrison <wharrison@nbpower.com>, "Mike.Comeau" <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, "Holland, Mike (LEG)" <mike.holland@gnb.ca>, Gudie.Hutchings@parl.gc.ca, Yvonne.Jones@parl.gc.ca, Ken.McDonald@parl.gc.ca, Seamus.ORegan@parl.gc.ca, Churence.Rogers@parl.gc.ca, scott.simms@parl.gc.ca, Jim.Carr@parl.gc.ca, Dan.Vandal@parl.gc.ca, kevin.lamoureux@parl.gc.ca, Terry.Duguid@parl.gc.ca, Larry.Bagnell@parl.gc.ca, Michael.McLeod@parl.gc.ca

 
 
 

David Amos

<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 12:32 PM
To: "stephen.ellis" <stephen.ellis@parl.gc.ca>, "rick.perkins" <rick.perkins@parl.gc.ca>, "Raquel.Dancho" <Raquel.Dancho@parl.gc.ca>, "taleeb.noormohamed" <taleeb.noormohamed@parl.gc.ca>, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news-tips <news-tips@nytimes.com>, clifford.small@parl.gc.ca, contactmistersunshinebaby@gmail.com, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, rokaku8 <rokaku8@gmail.com>, nsinvestigators <nsinvestigators@gmail.com>, "pierre.poilievre" <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Mike.Comeau" <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, "kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca>, NightTimePodcast <NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>, "Nathalie.G.Drouin" <Nathalie.G.Drouin@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, attorneygeneral@doj.nh.gov
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino" <Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
Bcc: myson333 <myson333@yahoo.com>

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2022/10/nova-scotia-mass-shooting-oct-23-2022.html

Friday, 28 October 2022

Nova Scotia Mass Shooting - October Surprise 2022 - with the help of
Paul Palango and his pals


 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGUnEKseIbs&ab_channel=CBCNews


Did Ottawa interfere in the investigation of the Nova Scotia mass shooting?
42,144 views
Jun 21, 2022
449
CBC News
 3.2M subscribers
A report released by a public inquiry into the 2020 Nova Scotia mass
shooting suggests RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki had promised the
government to release information regarding the firearms used in the
tragedy. MPs Taleeb Noormohamed and Raquel Dancho weigh in. To read
more: http://cbc.ca/1.6496511

293 Comments

David Amos
David Amos
Methinks CBC et al should start reviewing my emails N'esy Pas?
 
 

Notice of meeting

Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security (SECU)
44th Parliament, 1st Session
 
Meeting 43
Monday, October 31, 2022, 3:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.
Webcast
 

3:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Appearing
• Hon. Mr. Bill Blair, P.C., M.P., President of the King’s Privy Council for Canada and Minister of Emergency Preparedness
Witnesses
Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness
• Shawn Tupper, Deputy Minister

4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.
Witnesses
Royal Canadian Mounted Police
• Commr Brenda Lucki
 
 
Clerk of the committee
Simon Larouche (613-944-5635)
 

Automatic reply: Auto: Methinks the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security are gonna have a Hell of a hearing on All Hallows Eve N'esy Pas?

Van Bynen, Tony - M.P.

<Tony.VanBynen@parl.gc.ca>
Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 2:33 PM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting Tony Van Bynen, Member of Parliament for Newmarket-Aurora.

All emails sent to my office are read either by myself or my team. We respond to all email letters (non-form) from Newmarket-Aurora constituents. My office often receives a high volume of emails and so sometimes it may take up to 7 days for a reply.

For urgent matters please call my office at 905-953-7515 and speak to us directly. Our office hours are Monday-Friday 9am to 5pm.

Federal services my office can help with: Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship, Canada Pension Plan (CPP), Old Age Security (OAS), Passport Canada, Employment Insurance (EI), National Student Loans, Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS), Canadian flag and pins, Anniversary & Birthday certificates, Indigenous Affairs, Parks Canada and Veterans Affairs. For more information visit VanBynen.ca

If you are not a resident of Newmarket-Aurora, please contact the MP for your riding. If you’re not sure who your MP is, you may input your postal code on the Elections Canada website to find out. 

Thank you,

Tony Van Bynen

Member of Parliament

Newmarket-Aurora

 
 

Hey Paul Hinman I just called about this email

 

Calkins, Blaine - M.P.

<blaine.calkins@parl.gc.ca>
Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 8:11 PM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting the office of Blaine Calkins, Member of Parliament for Red Deer - Lacombe. Mr. Calkins welcomes hearing from constituents about issues that are important to them.  

To ensure that the constituents of Red Deer - Lacombe are given top priority, please verify your name and complete mailing address, including postal code. 

Please note, correspondence will be prioritized based on urgency.   

If your email is general comments or thoughts on a matter, on behalf of Mr. Calkins, I would like thank you for sharing. Your message will be noted and kept on record for consideration and awareness.  

As our office is experiencing exceptionally high email traffic, we appreciate your understanding with the limited resources and need to prioritize those of urgent matter. Please rest assured every email will be read and shared with Mr. Calkins.  

Thank you again for taking the time to contact our office.  

Sincerely, 

 

Chris Everett 

Executive Assistant and Director of Personnel
Office of Blaine Calkins – Member of Parliament for Red Deer–Lacombe
Chair, Conservative Hunting and Angling Caucus

Telephone:   613.995.8886 |  Email:  blaine.calkins@parl.gc.ca

This email is intended only for the individual or entity named in the message. Please let me know if you have received this email in error.  

If you did receive this email in error, the information in this email may be confidential and must not be disclosed to anyone

 

McPherson, Heather - M.P.

<Heather.McPherson@parl.gc.ca>
Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 8:11 PM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

[le français suit]

 

Thank you for contacting the office of Heather McPherson, MP for Edmonton Strathcona. Given the extraordinary volume of emails we receive daily, we are unable to reply to them all - but please rest assured that we do read them and your messages to Heather are important.

 

If you are a constituent looking for assistance with federal programs, please ensure that you have provided us your full name, address, and telephone number so that we may follow up with you.

 

If you are in need of urgent help, the following services are available via telephone:

·         Emergency needs (food, clothing, shelter): 1-866-644-5135

·         Mental Health Distress Line: 780-482-4357

·         Mental Health Live Chat: 1-877-302-2642 (available weekday day & evenings + weekend afternoons)

·         Seniors Abuse Helpline: 780-454-8888

·         Family violence info line: 780-310-1818

·         Child and family crisis support: 1-800-638-0715

·         Child abuse hotline: 1-800-387-5437

·         Crisis Diversion Team: 211 (Press 3 for the 24/7 Crisis Diversion Team)

·         Trans Lifeline: 1-877-330-6366

·         Sexual Assault Centre of Edmonton: 780-423-4121

·         WIN House Women’s Shelter: 780-479-0058

·         Lurana Women’s Shelter: 780-424-5875

Below are a few non-emergency phone numbers:

·         Alberta Health Services: 811

·         Alberta Health & Seniors Advocates: 780-422-1812

·         Seniors help line: 211

·         City of Edmonton help line, including bylaw inquiries such as parking, construction, noise and/or neighbourhood cleanliness: 311

·         Alberta Works: 780-644-9992

·         Edmonton Community Legal Centre: 780-702-1725

·         Legal Aid: 1-866-845-3425

Constituency Staff,

 

Heather McPherson

Member of Parliament for Edmonton Strathcona

New Democratic Party of Canada

____________

 

Merci d’avoir communiqué avec le bureau de Heather McPherson, députée d’Edmonton Strathcona. Dès que nous recevons quotidiennement un volume extraordinaire de couriels, nous ne sommes pas en mesure de répondre a tous - mail soyez assuré que nous les lisons et que vos messages à Heather sont importants.

 

Si vous êtes un cocitoyen et que vous voulez de l’aide à propos des programmes fédéraux, veuillez-vous assurer que vous nous avez fourni votre nom complet, votre adresse, et votre numéro de téléphone afin que nous puissions faire un suivi avec vous.

 

Si vous avez un urgent besoin d’aide, voici des ressources téléphoniques :

·         Aide urgente pour les besoins de première nécessité (ravitaillement, habillement et hébergement) : 1-866-644-5135

·         Ligne d’écoute pour les personnes en détresse psychologique : 780-482-4357

·         Clavardage en direct pour la santé mentale : 1-877-302-2642 (le jour et le soir durant la semaine, l’après-midi durant la fin de semaine)

·         Ligne d’assistance pour les aînés victimes de mauvais traitements : 780-454-8888

·         Ligne d’information sur la violence familiale : 780-310-1818

·         Soutien à l’enfance et à la famille en crise : 1-800-638-0715

·         Numéro d’urgence pour la violence faite aux enfants : 1-800-387-5437

·         Équipe de déjudiciarisation en situation de crise : 211 (faites le 3 pour l’équipe disponible en tout temps)

·         Trans Lifeline : 1-877-330-6366

·         Centre d’aide aux victimes d’agressions sexuelles d’Edmonton : 780-423-4121

·         Refuge pour femmes WINhouse : 780-479-0058

·         Refuge pour femmes Lurana : 780-424-5875

Vous trouverez ci-dessous le numéro de services non urgents :

·         Services de soins de santé de l’Alberta : 811

·         Intervenant auprès des personnes âgées et en matière de santé de l’Alberta : 780-422-1812

·         Ligne d’aide pour les personnes âgées : 211

·         Ligne d’aide de la ville d’Edmonton (information concernant le règlement municipal sur le stationnement, la construction, le bruit et la propreté des quartiers) : 311

·         Alberta Works : 780-644-9992

·         Centre d’aide juridique communautaire d’Edmonton : 780-702-1725

·         Aide juridique : 1-866-845-3425

Le personnel dans la circonscription,

 

Heather McPherson

Députée d’Edmonton Strathcona

Nouveau Parti démocratique du Canada

 

Automatic reply: RE Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act and Freeland defending her liberal democracy byway of her bankster buddies

McKinnon, Ron - M.P.

<Ron.McKinnon@parl.gc.ca>
Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 10:07 PM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>



Good Day, 

 

Thank you for contacting the Office of Ron McKinnon, Member of Parliament  for Coquitlam – Port Coquitlam.  

 

This email is an automatic response to inform you that our office has received your correspondence. Due to the high volume of cases, please give our office time to respond.  Please be advised that this account is not monitored after hours.  

 

Our office is CLOSED indefinitely for in person inquiries, we will be handling all inquiries through email or over the phone. If you are having an emergency situation, please state that in the “subject heading with your postal code” of your email and we will do our best to get back to you as soon as we can.  

 

Should you need to speak with us, we can be reached  Monday to Friday, from 9:00 am to 4:30 pm at 604-927-1080 or 613-992-9650. Please leave your name, telephone number and postal code with a brief message.  

 

If you require assistance with a federal service, please visit Canada.ca/coronavirus or see the below  information to contact them directly: 

 

  • Service Canada 1-800-206-7218  
  • Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada Client Support Centre 1-888-242-2100 (In Canada only)  
  • Consular assistance you can call the 24/7 Emergency Watch and Response Centre in Ottawa at +1 613-996-8885 (collect calls are accepted where available) or email sos@international.gc.ca. 

 

If you are concerned that you may have been exposed to, or are experiencing symptoms of the novel coronavirus, please contact your primary care provider, local public health office, or call 8-1-1. 

 

 

Thank you again for reaching out to our office.  

 

Sincerely, 

 

Ron McKinnon 

Member of Parliament for Coquitlam – Port Coquitlam 

 

 

Automatic reply: Bill C-21: Call to Action by OFAH

Premier

<PREMIER@leg.gov.mb.ca>
Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 12:05 AM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>




 

Office of the Premier

<scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>
Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 12:05 AM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Dancho, Raquel - M.P.

<Raquel.Dancho@parl.gc.ca>
Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 12:07 AM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>


Rempel, Michelle - M.P.

<Michelle.Rempel@parl.gc.ca>
Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 12:07 AM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
 

Julian, Peter - M.P.

<peter.julian@parl.gc.ca>
Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 12:07 AM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Angus, Charlie - M.P.

<charlie.angus@parl.gc.ca>
Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 12:07 AM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Réponse automatique : Bill C-21: Call to Action by OFAH

Add star 

Blanchet, Yves-François - Député

<Yves-Francois.Blanchet@parl.gc.ca>
Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 12:07 AM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

(Ceci est une réponse automatique)

(English follows)

Bonjour,

Nous avons bien reçu votre courriel et nous vous remercions d'avoir écrit à M. Yves-François Blanchet, député de Beloeil-Chambly et chef du Bloc Québécois.

Comme nous avons un volume important de courriels, il nous est impossible de répondre à tous individuellement. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel recevra toute l'attention nécessaire.

L'équipe du député Yves-François Blanchet

Chef du Bloc Québécois

Thank you for your email. We will read it as soon as we can.

Re: Bill C-21: Call to Action by OFAH

David Amos

<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 12:05 AM
To: gwbalchofah@rogers.com, rayboilard.ofah@gmail.com, markbraetofah@gmail.com, Mrmac1954@gmail.com, paulprowseofah@gmail.com, instructor_0230@yahoo.ca, "David.Akin" <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, Rachel.Gilmore@globalnews.ca, THopper@postmedia.com, evan.dyer@cbc.ca, Trevor.Pritchard@cbc.ca, matt_demille@ofah.org, brianpreston@hotmail.com, paul.chiang@parl.gc.ca, Yves-Francois.Blanchet@parl.gc.ca, "charlie.angus" <charlie.angus@parl.gc.ca>, "Bob.Zimmer" <Bob.Zimmer@parl.gc.ca>, "Peter.Zimonjic" <Peter.Zimonjic@cbc.ca>, "peter.julian" <peter.julian@parl.gc.ca>, clement.goh@cbc.ca, guncourse@hotmail.com
Cc: nsinvestigators <nsinvestigators@gmail.com>, "heidi.petracek" <heidi.petracek@bellmedia.ca>, NightTimePodcast <NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>, news <news@chco.tv>, andrewjdouglas <andrewjdouglas@gmail.com>, "John.Williamson" <John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, randy.macdonald@firearmrights.ca, sales@freedomventures.ca, paulpalango <paulpalango@protonmail.com>, "warren.mcbeath" <warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, scott.carpenter@firearmrights.ca, info@firearmrights.ca, media@firearmrights.ca, michel.perez@firearmrights.ca, kelly.wheaton@firearmrights.ca, kelly.kincaid@firearmrights.ca, mark.michie@firearmrights.ca, scott.bell@firearmrights.ca, "Michelle.Boutin" <Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, wprc2005@gmail.com, info@invictus-specialities.com, kelvinswinimer@hotmail.com, info@theshootingcentre.com, cameronarms@hotmail.com, huntfuelcoffee@gmail.com, stadlerlj@aol.com, sales@theshootingedge.com, mts@kitalphaeng.com, wcammosales@gmail.com, "Mike.Comeau" <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, "Matthew.Green" <Matthew.Green@parl.gc.ca>, sterchi@dbblaw.com, tracey.wilson@firearmrights.ca, tlawrason@mdprovost.ca, ken.allen@firearmrights.ca, sandro.abballe@firearmrights.ca, rfgl.info@sasktel.net, info@dcgunsmith.ca, quadbadventures@hotmail.com, info@capitalbd.ca, info@thegundealer.ca, info@ltt-tactical.ca, randy@directactions.ca, performance@johndzurka.ca, bprill@blplaw.ca, info@targetsportscanada.com, doug@marchscopes.ca, sales@marstar.ca, mloberg@loberg-law.com, "Marco.Mendicino" <Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, Richard.Evans@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Nathalie.G.Drouin" <Nathalie.G.Drouin@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, "kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nt.ca>, premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.fin" <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, rob.moore@parl.gc.ca, rokaku8 <rokaku8@gmail.com>, "Raquel.Dancho" <Raquel.Dancho@parl.gc.ca>, "Pineo, Robert" <rpineo@pattersonlaw.ca>, justmin <justmin@gov.ns.ca>, "michelle.rempel" <michelle.rempel@parl.gc.ca>, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "pierre.poilievre" <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, "jagmeet.singh" <jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, Brian Ruhe <brian@brianruhe.ca>, paul <paul@paulfromm.com>, "Paul.Lynch" <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>, "pat.morris" <pat.morris@opp.ca>, bmiller <bmiller@fosterllp.ca>, James Lockyer <jlockyer@lzzdefence.ca>


https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2022/11/things-got-crazy-as-rod-giltaca-spoke.html


Sunday, 6 November 2022

Things got CrAzY as Rod Giltaca spoke to the Public Safety Committee
on Bill C-21
 

https://www.ofah.org/firearms/c21-action/

Bill C-21: Call to Action

NOTE: Due to the overwhelming use of the form, our service provider has shut us down. We apologize for the inconvenience. Our team is working to resolve the issue as soon as possible.

Liberal MP Paul Chiang (Markham-Unionville) has introduced a significant amendment to firearms Bill C-21 at the committee stage that, if adopted, would significantly expand the definition of a prohibited firearm to include many centre-fire semi-automatic rifles and shotguns “designed to accept a detachable cartridge magazine with a capacity greater than five cartridges of the type for which the firearm was originally designed”.

Among other things, the OFAH is concerned about:

  • The potential impact of adding hundreds of models and significant cost to the proposed buyback program
  • The impact on hunters, as many of these firearms are used by hunters across the country
  • The introduction of an amendment of this magnitude at such a late stage
  • The lack of transparency – there is no opportunity for individuals or groups to submit evidence about the amendments

More information about the impact of this amendment will be available in the coming days as the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security continues its clause-by-clause analysis.

WHAT CAN YOU DO?

Below we have provided concerned citizens with an easy-to-use form to email their MP.

How does it work?

  • Select your Member of Parliament from the drop-down list
  • Respectfully express your concerns in the comment box. We’ve put some of our comments in the box below if you’d like to use them to support your own commentary.
  • Hit send.

NOTE: Your comments will be emailed directly to your MP, along with the Minister of Public Safety Marco Mendicino, all Ontario Senators, all members of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, and Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau. 

https://www.ofah.org/zonej/executive/

 

Here is a tip for any Proud Canadian 


Just Press Print on one old file of mine and give it any cop or lawyer or politician and demand that they explain it to you real slow
 
 
 
 
 

Federal gun control bill ruffles local rifle owners

Prime minister says hunters not being targeted, vows to review amendments to Bill C-21

Windsor author says federal legislation would ban widely owned rifle

Duration 1:16
A.J. Somerset shows his SKS semi-automatic hunting rifle, which is one of the rifles that would be banned in Canada under the proposed Bill C-21 in its current form. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says the legislation is now under review to ensure it does not go after hunting rifles.
 Area hunters, anglers and sport shooters are angry over proposed additions to the federal government's gun control legislation, Bill C-21.

After the bill passed second reading, the Liberals introduced amendments to strengthen the legislation and make some long guns illegal. 

A. J. Somerset is an author on gun culture and the owner of an SKS semi-automatic rifle. He says it is one of the most commonly used guns in hunting and adding it to the list of banned weapons doesn't make sense.

"We can say that banning assault weapons, whether you agree it's necessary or not, at least it's a legitimate policy goal. But the way in which this is being done is banning a lot of guns that really don't fit the definition," said Somerset.

Somerset surmises the SKS Soviet-era weapon was added to the list because of its use in recent high-profile shooting incidents.

    A. J. Somerset owns one of the rifles that could be banned under the proposed legislation. He also authored a book on gun culture. (Dale Molnar/CBC)

Ray Boilard, 1st vice chair of Zone J of the Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters, says Bill C-21 is going after the wrong people.

"The law abiding sport shooter and hunter is not holding up corner stores or partaking in mass shootings," said Boilard. "The Liberal government with this Order in Council is not going to be taking away guns from the average criminal."

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said on Monday afternoon the government's gun control legislation is being reviewed to ensure it does not target legitimate gun use.

Trudeau says they are not trying to target hunters and sport shooters.

Boilard says he will believe the government when he sees the hunting long guns taken off the list.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Dale Molnar

Video Journalist

Dale Molnar is a video journalist at CBC Windsor. He is a graduate of the University of Windsor and has worked in television, radio and print. He has received a number of awards including an RTDNA regional TV news award and a New York Festivals honourable mention.

 
 
Comments
 
 
David Amos
At last a comment section to study 
 
 
Buddy Wallis 
Having Liberals write gun laws is like having someone who has never driven and hates cars writing all the traffic laws. 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Buddy Wallis
C'est Vrai 
 
 
 
John Swanson 
Time to move to Alberta only Province with guts. 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to John Swanson
Madame Bell of SK stepped up to the plate and began swinging last week 
 
 
Robby Butler
Reply to John Swanson 
We will not comply 
 
 
Stu Grimsone 
More legislation that will do nothing for Gun crimes... nobody robs a bank with a 4ft long shotgun that people hunt with. This is complete idiocy. Meanwhile, Criminals keep getting smuggled guns from the US to shoot up our streets and the Government has no answer for that.  
 
 
 
 

Methinks you forgot the old faithful lever action 30 30s N'esy Pas?
 
 
 
 
 

London-area gun owners glad PM wants review after federal weapons ban targets ordinary guns

'They didn't do their homework," said Tory MP Karen Vecchio of the C-21 Liberal gun bill

Gun owners in London, Ont., say they're happy the federal government has agreed to review its last minute changes to a proposed list of banned of firearms, which many critics say would unfairly target hunters by outlawing ordinary guns and not "assault-style" firearms.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced the review on Monday while at the reopening of the CAMI manufacturing plant in Ingersoll, Ont., promising his government would take a step back and give the controversial list a second look. 

Last week, Liberal MP Paul Chiang expanded the scope of the legislation after the bill passed second reading, introducing the following changes to the list of federally-banned weapons:

  • Any rifle or shotgun that can potentially accept a magazine with more than five rounds
  • Any weapon that generates more than 10,000 joules of energy
  • Any gun with a muzzle wider than 20 millimetres
  • A large number of semi-automatic firearms that do not have detachable magazines, including a number of long gun models in wide use by Canadian hunters

Critics say the changes to the bill, which was originally meant to target handguns and powerful military-style weapons, would now ban everything from blackpowder muskets, semi-automatic shotguns — even some low-calibre varmint rifles, designed primarily to kill rodents. 

"Maybe they got enough backlash," said Brian Kington, a firearm and hunting instructor with the East Elgin Sportsmen's Association said of the review announced by Trudeau on Monday. 

"Some of the guns they got on there, they're sporting guns, hunters use them all the time."

The expanded scope of the weapons ban was meant to build on an initial proposal in May 2020 that banned more than 1,500 models and variants of what the government considers "assault-style firearms."

But critics point out that, among the weapons on the expanded list, are a number of semi-automatic shotguns, capable of shooting up to a maximum of three shots, designed for duck hunters; not soldiers.

"They're not designed the way the government suggests," said Fred Staub, registration representative at Rueger Firearm Safety in Dorchester, Ont., and a member of London's gun community.

Staub said the last-minute change to the list was reactionary — aimed at trying to keep specific weapons out of a criminal's arsenal without considering the potential implications for law-abiding gun owners. 

"Somebody goes out and commits a heinous crime using that gun, then they go and look at the gun the person has and says 'nobody should have that gun.'"

"You think for a second that person wouldn't have killed somebody with a different gun?"

Some vintage hunting rifles face prohibition for exceeding a rule that bans guns that produce over 10,000 joules of energy. One example is the Westley-Richards rifle in .460 Weatherby Magnum caliber. (Rock Island Auction)

Last week, Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino told the House of Commons hunters with conventional guns would not be targeted by the expanded list, but that wasn't the case, according to Karen Vecchio, the Conservative MP for Elgin-Middlesex London.

"It's fine to say 'it's not affecting the rifles and shotguns of farmers,' but it absolutely is."

"It's clear they didn't do their homework," she said. "These hunters are using them for hunting rabbits, small vermin, things of that sort."

"I think what the government has done is they've come in not recognizing the guns they put on there." 

CBC News reached out to Marco Mendicino for comment, but did not receive a response in time for publication.

According to the federal government, the amendment featuring the latest review of the proposed legislation will now involve consultations with hunting communities across the country.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Clement Goh

Digital Producer

Clement is a writer across TV and Digital with CBC Toronto and CBC London. Since 2018, he has also worked in various newsrooms across the GTA covering city affairs, community events and entertainment. Outside, he is a resident gamer and keeps his popcorn close at the latest movie premieres. You can reach him with tips, story ideas and compliments at clement.goh@cbc.ca and Twitter via @theinstaword

with files from Peter Zimonjic and Evan Dyer

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

Fred Staub

B.A. & O.M.D.P.


519-615-4867

Registration representative for Sue Rueger aka “Sue’s better half”

guncourse@hotmail.com

 Hey Fred Enjoy

A Goose That Didn’t Matter”
 
I guess at least eight hundred ducks have fallen to my gun,
And Charlie’s always been right there retrieving every one.
But somehow, try as we might,no matter what our ruse,
We failed, that old Black Lab and I, to ever get a goose.
 
The vet had said it must be done, so bring him in on Monday.
His eyesight’s weak and he’s too old to brave the Bay of Fundy.
I’d picked him from the litter even though his was the runt.
And now fourteen years later, this would be our final hunt.
And so I asked a friend that night, who grew some corn and barley
If I could hunt his field next day, to get a goose for Charlie.
 
No bird came to our blind, alas, because of bluebird weather,
But still we enjoyed the day, because we were together,
While driving home with heavy heart, I rubbed the grizzled head,
And looking in those big brown eyes, to him, I softly said,
You know a man can only do the best that he is able,
It don’t appear there’ll be a roasted honker on our table,
But Charlie, we’ll have porkchops, since that is your favourite treat,
And you’ll not just have one or two, but all that you can eat”
 
And so that night, by lantern light, we shared our final meal,
I talked to him of days gone by, of Mallards, Scaup and Teal,
Old Charlie wagged his tail with joy, beside his heaping platter,
And missing from the menu was, a goose - that didn’t matter.
 
Bill Foster

 

 https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/carey-price-gun-control-polytechnique-1.6674809

 

Price apologizes, says he did know about Polytechnique shooting

Habs goalie says he did know about the massacre after team said he did not

The Montreal Canadiens organization and goalie Carey Price have issued apologies after Price posted a message on social media in support of a gun lobby group that recently used "POLY" as a promotional discount code.

The team issued a statement on Monday that Price didn't know about the 1989 Polytechnique Massacre or its upcoming anniversary.

However, Price said Tuesday said he did know about the massacre and regretted the timing of his post. 

Price published his initial Instagram post on Saturday, just days ahead of the massacre's Dec. 6 anniversary. In it, Price shared his support for a lobby group, the Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights (CCFR), following amendments to the federal government's gun control legislation, Bill C-21, last week. 

The amendments appeared to push the bill further by including a number of firearms used for hunting, a move that was swiftly condemned by firearm advocates and that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said the government is looking into rectifying.

Price, 35, has spoken in the past about the importance of hunting to him. He is a member of Ulkatcho First Nation — his mother is a former chief — and grew up in the small remote community of Anahim Lake in British Columbia. 

"I love my family, I love my country and I care for my neighbour. I am not a criminal or a threat to society. What [Prime Minister Justin Trudeau] is trying to do is unjust. I support the [CCFR] to keep my hunting tools," Price wrote. 

But the post also came a day after one of the survivors of the Polytechnique mass shooting, Nathalie Provost, denounced the CCFR for creating promotional code "POLY" offering customers 10 per cent off of merchandise. 

Provost, who is also a spokesperson for the gun-control group PolySeSouvient, created by survivors of the massacre, called the discount code "incredibly disrespectful." The code was in reference to the group. 

Provost was shot four times by the gunman who killed 14 female students and injured 13 others that day.

Team apologizes for post

Monday evening, Price tweeted that he only made the Instagram post in reaction to the Bill C-21 amendments.

"My views are my own and I do believe them. The only reason I bring up this issue is because it is what's being brought up now and not out of disrespect to anyone," Price wrote. "No, I [don't] agree with the promotional code either."

In a statement earlier in the day, France Margaret Bélanger, the president of Groupe CH, the company that owns the Montreal Canadiens hockey team, said the group had shared negative reactions to the post with Price. 

"He was not aware of the tragic events of Dec. 6, 1989, nor of the coalition's recent marketing initiatives," Bélanger told Radio-Canada in an email.

Montreal Canadiens goalie Carey Price posted a picture of himself with a gun and the message 'I love my family, I love my country and I care for my neighbour. I am not a criminal or a threat to society. What @justinpjtrudeau is trying to do is unjust.' (Carey Price/Instagram)

Monday evening, the team issued a statement on Price's post.

"The Montreal Canadiens wish to express their sincere apology to any and all who have been offended or upset by the discourse that has arisen over this matter in recent days," the statement said.

The statement also recognized the National Day of Remembrance and Action on Violence Against Women — saying the team's thoughts are with the 14 women who died 33 years ago, their loved ones and survivors.

The team said it made a donation to the Week of the White Rose campaign to send 14 underprivileged girls to Polytechnique Montréal's summer science camp, Folie Technique.

On Tuesday, Price posted an update to his Instagram page.

"I think the people of Montreal know my heart and my character and know I would never intentionally cause pain to those impacted by gun violence," he wrote. 

"Despite a previous statement released, I did in fact know about the tragedy. I have been a member of the MTL community for 15 years and I understand the weight this day holds within the community."

Price said he stood by the opinions he shared but acknowledged that "amplifying any conversation around guns this week may have upset some of those impacted most by the events here in 1989 and to them I apologize." 

Coach says timing unfortunate

Canadiens coach Martin St-Louis said the timing of Price's initial Instagram post was unfortunate but that he did not believe the player meant any malice by it. 

"I'm not sure Carey knows the full story [of the Montreal massacre]. I remember it clearly; I was a boarding student at Collège Notre-Dame. I was 14 and it really shook me," St-Louis told reporters Monday afternoon.

The private college is next to the Université de Montréal campus where Polytechnique, the university's engineering school, is and where the mass shooting took place. 

"I'm not sure people outside of Quebec know all about it. Carey's a sensitive guy, he's a family guy. I don't think the post was made with malicious intentions," St-Louis added.

Contentious gun control legislation

As for the relationship between Price and the firearms advocacy group, Bélanger said, "I believe Carey is best positioned to answer that."

Speaking in Ingersoll, Ont., Trudeau attempted to reassure gun owners Monday by promising the legislation is being reviewed to ensure it does not target legitimate gun use.

WATCH | Prime Minister Justin Trudeau responds to C-21 amendments pushback:

‘We’re not going after hunting rifles or shotguns,’ PM says

Duration 1:50
In response to criticism of Bill C-21, Trudeau reaffirms commitment to go after ‘the most dangerous weapons’ and says the government is listening to feedback to ensure it is ‘not capturing weapons that are primarily hunting weapons.’

He made the comments in response to widespread pushback against significant amendments made to Bill C-21, a bill crafted initially to ban handguns that the Liberals are attempting to amend with a new list of long guns to be banned.

It's unclear whether the firearm Price is holding in the photo he posted is included in that list or not. 

Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet said on Twitter that Price had been convinced "that the purpose or effect of gun control is to harm hunting for sport, which is incorrect."

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Verity Stevenson is a reporter with CBC in Montreal. She has previously worked for the Globe and Mail and the Toronto Star in Toronto, and the Telegraph-Journal in Saint John.

With files from Peter Zimonjic, The Canadian Press and Radio-Canada

Fwd: Good on you about Chinese Covid protesters

 

Doug Wright

<doug.freedom@icloud.com>
Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 4:20 PM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>


Regards
Douglas Wright


PastedGraphic-2.png

207 - 3916 64 Ave. SE
Calgary, AB T2C 2B4
Ph: 403 236 0032  Cell: 587 998 8834 
doug@marchscopes.ca
www.marchscopes.ca
About 140 March Scopes are in stock. 
Prices and stock are listed on our web site
PastedGraphic-3.png



Wright Business Center
Offices and Warehouse space for rent
207 - 3916  64 Ave. SE
Calgary, AB   T2C 2B4
403 236 0032  Cell: 587 998 8834



Begin forwarded message:

From: Doug Wright <doug.freedom@icloud.com>
Subject: Good on you about Chinese Covid protesters
Date: December 6, 2022 at 1:17:13 PM MST

You are the laughing stock of the world..  :)


Trudeau said Monday that the focus of Bill C-21 is on guns designed to
"kill the largest amount of people as quickly as possible.

You mean like the kind of guns that you are sending to Ukraine?
The ones that you are sending that you told us were to stop the blood shed!

What kind of a moron are you to believe that sending more guns to the criminals running the Ukraine  will stop the blood shed?  
It will create more!
Wake up. 
The people are waking up!
Your days as leader are numbered.. or are you planing to install some more voting machines to steal another election?


 
Regards
Douglas Wright

 

 

Too Too Funny Trudeau spresd the BS so thick about Bill C 21 that CBC would not allow any comments to be published

David Amos

<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 3:41 PM
To: Roger Richard <rrichard@nb.aibn.com>, "David.Akin" <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, Rachel.Gilmore@globalnews.ca, THopper@postmedia.com, evan.dyer@cbc.ca, Trevor.Pritchard@cbc.ca, matt_demille@ofah.org, brianpreston@hotmail.com, paul.chiang@parl.gc.ca, Yves-Francois.Blanchet@parl.gc.ca, "charlie.angus" <charlie.angus@parl.gc.ca>, "Bob.Zimmer" <Bob.Zimmer@parl.gc.ca>, "Peter.Zimonjic" <Peter.Zimonjic@cbc.ca>, "peter.julian" <peter.julian@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: nsinvestigators <nsinvestigators@gmail.com>, "heidi.petracek" <heidi.petracek@bellmedia.ca>, NightTimePodcast <NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>, news <news@chco.tv>, andrewjdouglas <andrewjdouglas@gmail.com>, "John.Williamson" <John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, randy.macdonald@firearmrights.ca, sales@freedomventures.ca, paulpalango <paulpalango@protonmail.com>, "warren.mcbeath" <warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, scott.carpenter@firearmrights.ca, info@firearmrights.ca, media@firearmrights.ca, michel.perez@firearmrights.ca, kelly.wheaton@firearmrights.ca, kelly.kincaid@firearmrights.ca, mark.michie@firearmrights.ca, scott.bell@firearmrights.ca, "Michelle.Boutin" <Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, wprc2005@gmail.com, info@invictus-specialities.com, kelvinswinimer@hotmail.com, info@theshootingcentre.com, cameronarms@hotmail.com, huntfuelcoffee@gmail.com, stadlerlj@aol.com, sales@theshootingedge.com, mts@kitalphaeng.com, wcammosales@gmail.com, "Mike.Comeau" <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, "Matthew.Green" <Matthew.Green@parl.gc.ca>, sterchi@dbblaw.com, tracey.wilson@firearmrights.ca, tlawrason@mdprovost.ca, ken.allen@firearmrights.ca, sandro.abballe@firearmrights.ca, rfgl.info@sasktel.net, info@dcgunsmith.ca, quadbadventures@hotmail.com, info@capitalbd.ca, info@thegundealer.ca, info@ltt-tactical.ca, randy@directactions.ca, performance@johndzurka.ca, bprill@blplaw.ca, info@targetsportscanada.com, doug@marchscopes.ca, sales@marstar.ca, mloberg@loberg-law.com, "Marco.Mendicino" <Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, Richard.Evans@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Nathalie.G.Drouin" <Nathalie.G.Drouin@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, "kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nt.ca>, premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.fin" <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, rob.moore@parl.gc.ca, rokaku8 <rokaku8@gmail.com>, "Raquel.Dancho" <Raquel.Dancho@parl.gc.ca>, "Pineo, Robert" <rpineo@pattersonlaw.ca>, justmin <justmin@gov.ns.ca>, "michelle.rempel" <michelle.rempel@parl.gc.ca>, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "pierre.poilievre" <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, "jagmeet.singh" <jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, Brian Ruhe <brian@brianruhe.ca>, paul <paul@paulfromm.com>, "Paul.Lynch" <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>, "pat.morris" <pat.morris@opp.ca>, bmiller <bmiller@fosterllp.ca>, James Lockyer <jlockyer@lzzdefence.ca>


 
 
Sunday, 6 November 2022

Things got CrAzY as Rod Giltaca spoke to the Public Safety Committee
on Bill C-21

 
 
 

Bill C-21 that would ban some hunting rifles, shotguns gets pushback

The Liberal government's proposed firearms legislation which would add a new list of long guns to be banned is receiving widespread pushback. Marco Mendicino, minister of public safety, says the intent is to not go after law-abiding hunters while the opposition Raquel Dancho, Conservative public safety critic, says the Liberals are not being clear with Canadians on what guns will be banned. 
 
Methinks the plot thickens rather nicely N'esy Pas?
 
 
 
 

MPs join Michael Serapio to debate firearms bill – December 5, 2022

MPs Rachel Bendayan (Liberal), Raquel Dancho (Conservative), and Peter Julian (NDP) join Michael Serapio to debate Bill C-21 and which firearms should and should not be banned in Canada.
 

 
 

Question Period – December 5, 2022

Witness all the action in the House of Commons as Canada’s elected officials debate the issues of the day.
 
 
 

Bill C-21 being reviewed to ensure it doesn't affect hunting rifles, shotguns, says Trudeau

Trudeau says proposed gun control legislation not “going after hunting rifles or shotguns”

Speaking in Ingersoll, Ont., Trudeau said that the list of firearms that could be banned if Bill C-21 passes in its current form is being reviewed to ensure the legislation does not go after hunting rifles or shotguns.

"We just put forward a list and we're consulting with Canadians on that," Trudeau said.

"That's what we're listening to, feedback on how to make sure that we're not capturing weapons that are primarily hunting weapons."

Trudeau promised his government is not "going after hunting rifles or shotguns."

WATCH: 'We're not going after hunting rifles or shotguns,' PM says

‘We’re not going after hunting rifles or shotguns,’ PM says

Duration 1:50
In response to criticism of Bill C-21, Trudeau reaffirms commitment to go after ‘the most dangerous weapons’ and says the government is listening to feedback to ensure it is ‘not capturing weapons that are primarily hunting weapons.’

Trudeau made the comments in response to widespread pushback against significant amendments made to Bill C-21, a bill crafted initially to ban handguns that the Liberals are attempting to amend with a new list of long guns to be banned.

In a video posted to Instagram over the weekend, Montreal Canadiens goalie Carey Price objects to the new bill, insists that he is not a criminal or a "threat to society" and says he wants to keep his "hunting tools."

The Conservatives have been joined in opposition to the bill by Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet, who lamented on Twitter that the bill had convinced Price "and so many others that gun control's goal or effect is to hurt hunting."

"The amendment came out of nowhere," said NDP MP Charlie Angus, whose riding covers a vast swath of northern Ontario that includes many remote First Nations.

"This was a handgun bill. We suddenly saw this other legislation that has a lot of people who are legitimate gun owners worried. I think they overreached."

Trudeau said Monday that the focus of Bill C-21 is on guns designed to "kill the largest amount of people as quickly as possible."

"We made a commitment to continue to move forward with strong, smart gun control in this country, to keep communities safe, to keep Canadians safe, and we're going to continue to do that," he said.

WATCH | 'There is a process and we are listening': Minister Mendicino

'There is a process and we are listening': Minister Mendicino

Duration 12:11
If "weapons are commonly used for hunting then they will be exempted" said Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino about firearms listed in an amendment to the government's proposed gun legislation, Bill C-21.

In an interview with CBC News Network's Power & Politics, Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino also tried to allay fears that the government is targeting hunters.

Mendicino noted that the bill is still being considered at committee and hasn't been finalized. He also said banning hunting models would be a "red line" for the government.

"We're not going after guns that are commonly used for hunting. We are after the guns that exert the most lethal force in the shortest period of time," Mendicino told host David Cochrane.

WATCH | Opposition MPs discuss Bill C-21

Opposition MPs discuss Bill C-21

Duration 8:22
Conservative public safety critic Raquel Dancho and NDP House Leader Peter Julian joined Power & Politics Monday to debate the controversial amendment to Bill C-21.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Peter Zimonjic

Senior writer

Peter Zimonjic is a senior writer for CBC News. He has worked as a reporter and columnist in London, England, for the Daily Mail, Sunday Times and Daily Telegraph and in Canada for Sun Media and the Ottawa Citizen. He is the author of Into The Darkness: An Account of 7/7, published by Random House.

With files from the CBC's Evan Dyer

 
 
 
 

How Bill C-21 turned from banning handguns to hunting guns

The government's latest amendment would ban many hunting rifles, shotguns, even antique cannons

Confusion was on the agenda at a parliamentary committee last week after the Liberal government brought in last-minute amendments to its contentious gun control legislation.

The proposed changes to Bill C-21 were tacked on by Liberal MP Paul Chiang after it had passed second reading — drawing complaints from opposition MPs who accused the government of sneaking in changes that would expand the scope of prohibited weapons to include hunting rifles.

The amendment adds long guns to the banned list in four different ways. First, it has a clause that would effectively ban any rifle or shotgun that could potentially accept a magazine with more than five rounds, whether or not it actually has such a magazine. Critics say that includes many rifles designed for hunters, not soldiers.

The list also names guns that fall afoul of two rules nominally intended to ban powerful military weapons such as .50-calibre sniper rifles and mortars. One rule bans long guns that can generate more than 10,000 joules of energy, and the other bans guns with a muzzle wider than 20 millimetres. Critics say those rules would ban everything from antique blunderbusses to the Nine O'clock Gun in Vancouver's Stanley Park.

Lastly, the amendment prohibits, by name, a large number of semi-automatic firearms that do not have detachable magazines and don't meet the definition of an "assault-style firearm," or infringe the other two rules, but which the government wants to ban anyway. They include a number of long guns in wide use by Canadian hunters.

CBC News asked to speak with Paul Chiang about the amendments but was told he was travelling and unavailable. 

Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino insisted that hunters are not being targeted.

"We have a plan to eradicate gun violence once and for all," Mendicino told the House of Commons on Friday. "We are not going to target those guns which are used conventionally for hunting."

Here's what we know and don't know about the changes.

Will the 'Plinkster' be banned?

That's not entirely clear.

"The Mossberg 702 .22 Plinkster long rifle. Will that hunting and target-shooting rifle be prohibited as a result of C-21 legislation?" Conservative MP Bob Zimmer asked at the parliamentary committee.

"No," replied Murray Smith, technical specialist with the government's Canadian Firearms Program. "The model 702 Plinkster is a conventional 22-calibre hunting rifle. It's unaffected by what's in C-21."

But in fact, one version of the Plinkster ("plinking" refers to shooting tin cans) is individually listed for prohibition in the amendments. 

The exchange captured some of the confusion caused by the 478-page amendment.

What do the opposition parties have to say?

Conservative MP Raquel Dancho called it "an attack on hunters."

"The arbitrary criteria that the Liberal government has snuck into their legislation at the eleventh hour without democratic debate does not make these firearms any less of a hunting tool," she said.

While Conservatives have long opposed some Liberal gun control measures, this time the NDP also balked.

"The amendment came out of nowhere," said NDP MP Charlie Angus, whose riding covers a vast swath of northern Ontario that includes many remote First Nations. "This was a handgun bill. We suddenly saw this other legislation that has a lot of people who are legitimate gun owners worried. I think they overreached."

Montreal Canadiens goalie Carey Price posted a picture of himself on Instagram with a semi-automatic hunting shotgun and a message that said, in part, 'I am not a criminal or a threat to society.' (Carey Price/Instagram)

And after Montreal Canadiens goalie Carey Price weighed in on the matter, Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet lamented on Twitter that the bill had convinced Price "and so many others that gun control's goal or effect is to hurt hunting."

The National Police Federation (NPF) described Bill C-21 overall as a missed opportunity to reduce gun crime.

"Bill C-21 does not address criminal activity, illegal firearms proliferation, gang crime, illegal guns crossing the border or criminal use of firearms," it said in its written submission to Parliament.

And on the prohibition of legally-held firearms, "the NPF would caution that it diverts extremely important personnel, resources, and funding away from addressing the more immediate and growing threat of criminal use of illegal firearms."

What do advocacy groups think?

Heidi Rathjen of pro-gun control group PolySeSouvient told CBC Radio's The House she agrees with the bill and amendments, but said they are "very complicated technically" and "difficult to explain."

"But in terms of communications, I think the Liberals could have done a much better job."

The House speaks to gun control advocate Heidi Rathjen, co-founder of the gun control group PolySeSouvient, about whether controversy over a proposed amendment to the government’s firearms legislation might put in jeopardy her thirty-year-long quest to have assault rifles banned.

Rathjen defended the rule that bans rifles that generate over 10,000 joules. "We're talking about .50-calibre military weapons that can pierce military equipment and structures," she said. 

But the rule would also ban some very expensive elephant and buffalo rifles that would more likely grace collectors' display cabinets than be used for hunting.

"Many of these old firearms date back to before the 1900s," says Tony Bernardo of the Canadian Shooting Sports Association. "Some of these guns are worth a half-million dollars or more. Many of them are single shots or they're double-barrelled, and the finest examples of the engraver's art."

WATCH | Hunters association head on new firearms bill changes:

Gun control laws trending towards 'flashy' bans, hunters association director says

2 days ago
Duration 1:31
Matt DeMille, the director of policies and programs for the Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters said new federal measures go beyond their "stated intent" of reducing gun violence.

Bernardo says crime will not be reduced by using taxpayers' money to buy and destroy those expensive relics, though he's quick to add that there is no mention of compensation in Bill C-21.

The bill has also been challenged by historical and reenactment groups, who say their antique cannons and artillery pieces pose no threat to public safety.

"Many of our veterans actively participate in period outfits as re-enactors to demonstrate the workings of the ordnance at formal salutes, displays, reenactments and the like," the Royal Canadian Artillery Association wrote to the committee studying C-21, saying the bill will make their activities a crime.

WATCH | Government looks to broaden list of prohibited firearms:

Ottawa moves to expand banned weapons list

11 days ago
Duration 1:47
A new government proposal will make more firearms illegal in Canada, adding many shotguns and semi-automatic rifles to the banned list.

A list of extra guns to ban

Perhaps the most controversial part of the amendment is that it proposes banning a number of guns that don't fit the government's new "assault-style firearm" definition. 

One is the SKS semi-automatic rifle, which Rathjen says was not in the original "assault rifle ban" in 2020 because "if a weapon was not a modern design, it was exempt." The SKS, designed in 1945, lacks features common to modern military rifles such as the AR-15. But the government has now decided it wants it banned.

WATCH | Calls to ban SKS rifle:

Calls to add Soviet-era rifle used in Canadian shootings to federal weapons ban

2 months ago
Duration 2:28
Advocates are calling for the SKS — a Soviet-era, semi-automatic rifle that was used in the 2022 Innisfil, Ont., shooting, the 2019 northern B.C. murders, and the 2018 mass shooting in Frederiction — to be added to Ottawa's military-style assault weapons ban.

There is a long tradition of Canadian hunters using what were once military rifles to hunt. The .303 Lee-Enfield, used in both the First and Second World Wars, was once the standard Canadian hunting rifle, and remains common, particularly in the North.

And today, says Bernardo, the SKS is "ubiquitous." 

"There are, by our best estimates, somewhat over a half a million SKS rifles in circulation in Canada," he told CBC News.

Because the SKS is currently in the non-restricted (and therefore unregistered) class of firearms, the government does not know who owns them. Consequently, it has no way of informing them individually that they will be in violation of a law that carries penalties of up to 10 years in prison.

Bernardo says the SKS is particularly common among Indigenous and sustenance hunters in remote areas who may only realize they have fallen afoul of new laws when they are arrested.

"The consequences of this are absolutely huge and, quite frankly, totally uncalled for."

Corrections

  • A previous version of this article stated that the amendment to C-21 would ban a number of Benelli auto-loading shotguns. While the bill does prohibit several Benelli shotguns, it exempts at least the great majority of models sold as hunting shotguns from the ban.
    Dec 06, 2022 7:43 AM ET

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Evan Dyer

Senior Reporter

Evan Dyer has been a journalist with CBC for 25 years, after an early career as a freelancer in Argentina. He works in the Parliamentary Bureau and can be reached at evan.dyer@cbc.ca.

 
 
 

Gun bill amendment is 'nonsense,' say Ottawa-area hunters

Proposal could see many semi-automatic rifles and shotguns prohibited

Local hunters are blasting a proposed amendment to federal gun-control legislation that could lead to a ban on many semi-automatic rifles and shotguns.

In late November, the Liberal government proposed to enshrine a definition of a prohibited assault-style firearm as part of legislation being studied by the House of Commons public safety committee.

The amendment to Bill C-21 was in response to pleas from advocates of tougher gun laws, with a spokesperson for gun control group PolySeSouvient calling it "another critical step towards a comprehensive and permanent ban on assault-style weapons in Canada."

It would build on a May 2020 regulatory ban of more than 1,500 models and variants of what the government considers assault-style firearms.

But it drew criticism from other circles — including the Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters, which is worried the definition could prohibit firearms used by hunters across the country.

"Hunters here are left thinking, you know, what's next?" said Matt DeMille, the federation's director of policies and programs, in an interview last week with CBC Ottawa News at 6.

"The government was clear that hunters and hunting firearms weren't the target of this legislation. Now we see that ... it is going to affect firearms that are being used by hunters across the country."

Gun control laws trending towards 'flashy' bans, hunters association director says

Duration 1:31
Matt DeMille, the director of policies and programs for the Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters said new federal measures go beyond their "stated intent" of reducing gun violence.

Prized by bird hunters

The amendment put forward by Liberal MP Paul Chiang would prohibit rifles or shotguns "capable of discharging centre-fire ammunition in a semi-automatic manner [and] designed to accept a detachable cartridge magazine with a capacity greater than five cartridges of the type for which the firearm was originally designed."

Semi-automatic rifles are designed so when the trigger is pulled, another bullet is loaded into the gun's chamber. They're especially prized by bird hunters, DeMille said, while farmers or ranchers might also prefer them as the best way to keep predators away.

"When you're shooting at a flock of geese, you might wait all day for the flock to come in. So [a semi-automatic] brings your chances quite higher," said Harvey Young, a hunter in Grenville-sur-la-Rouge, Que.

Semi-automatics also differ from automatic weapons, where multiple shots can be fired with a single pull. It's a distinction most Canadians don't understand, said Young — and he felt the proposed amendment takes advantage of that lack of understanding.

"It's nonsense. It's targeting people that aren't breaking the law," said Young, who owns two semi-automatics for shooting waterfowl.

"Every gun fires a bullet. It's the person behind the gun that makes the bad judgments."

Harvey Young, a hunter in Grenville-sur-la-Rouge, Que., calls the proposed amendment 'nonsense' and believes it won't actually lead to less crime. (Submitted by Harvey Young)

Thousands of rifles still available: Liberal MP

Liberal MP Taleeb Noormohamed told the Commons committee last week that nobody was trying to vilify hunters. Rather, the government was focusing on "weapons that should be banned because they have been responsible for taking life — killing human beings."

Citing numbers from a Department of Justice official, Noormohamed said once the new definition comes into force, there would still be as many as 20,000 types of firearms that would be classified as non-restricted and could be used for hunting.

Even so, the Ontario federation has issued a call to action, urging people to "respectfully" send thoughts on the amendment to their local MP via an online form. That form was no longer online Saturday afternoon, with the federation's website noting "overwhelming" use had led their service provider to shut it down.

Brian Preston, a long-time duck and goose hunter in the Township of Rideau Lakes, Ont., said he supported the federation's stance and accused the Liberals of ramming through another "unnecessary" gun law that won't act as designed.

"They target legal, trained, certified hunters. And they don't put enough [resources into] really going after the criminals," Preston said.

"They just seem to think it's easier to take all the guns away from Canadians ... it's the easy way out."

Read the amendment here:

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

 
Trevor Pritchard

Assignment producer/reporter

Trevor Pritchard is both a digital reporter and the weekend assignment producer at CBC Ottawa. He's previously reported in Toronto, Saskatoon and Cornwall, Ont.

With files from Omar Dabaghi-Pacheco and The Canadian Press

 
 
Please contact Matt DeMille at 705-748-6324 ext. 249 or by email at matt_demille@ofah.org
 
Cell 705 559 6777
 

RE Bill C-21 Need I say that I am a fan of Hon. Christine Tell today???

 
---------- Original message ----------
From: Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 18:18:45 +0000
Subject: Thank you for your email
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

This is to acknowledge that your email has been received by the Office
of the Premier.

We appreciate the time you have taken to write.


NOTICE:  This e-mail was intended for a specific person.  If it has
reached you by mistake, please delete it and advise me by return
e-mail.  Any privilege associated with this information is not waived.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance.

Avis: Ce message est confidentiel, peut être protégé par le secret
professionnel et est à l'usage exclusif de son destinataire. Il est
strictement interdit à toute autre personne de le diffuser, le
distribuer ou le reproduire. Si le destinataire ne peut être joint ou
vous est inconnu, veuillez informer l'expéditeur par courrier
électronique immédiatement et effacer ce message et en détruire toute
copie. Merci de votre cooperation.


---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier <PREMIER@leg.gov.mb.ca>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 18:18:45 +0000
Subject: Auto Reply Premier’s Secretariat
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

On behalf of The Honourable Heather Stefanson, Premier of Manitoba, we
would like to acknowledge receipt of your email.

Please note that this is an automated response to let you know that
your email has been received and that it will be reviewed at the
earliest opportunity.

 Thank you for taking the time to write.

Premier’s Correspondence Team
Executive Council
Government of Manitoba

*******************************

Au nom du premier ministre du Manitoba, Heather Stefanson, nous
accusons réception de votre courriel.

 Veuillez noter qu’il s’agit d’une réponse automatisée pour vous
informer que votre courriel a été reçu et qu’il sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.

 Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

Équipe chargée de la correspondance du premier ministre
Conseil exécutif
Gouvernement du Manitoba
 
 
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 18:20:19 +0000
Subject: Thank you for your email
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email to Premier Houston. This is an automatic
confirmation your message has been received.

As we are currently experiencing higher than normal volumes of
correspondence, there may be delays in the response time for
correspondence identified as requiring a response.

If you are looking for the most up-to-date information from the
Government of Nova Scotia please visit:
http://novascotia.ca<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnovascotia.ca%2F&data=04%7C01%7CJane.MacDonald%40novascotia.ca%7Ceeca3674da1940841c1b08da0c273c2c%7C8eb23313ce754345a56a297a2412b4db%7C0%7C0%7C637835659900957160%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=%2BUnVWeFXmCZiYsg7%2F6%2Bw55jn3t3WTeGL9l%2BLp%2BNkqNU%3D&reserved=0>

Thank you,

Premier’s Correspondence Team

 
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 18:20:28 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE Bill C-21 Need I say that I am a fan of
Hon. Christine Tell today???
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.

There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.

Thanks again for your email.
______

Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

Merci encore pour votre courriel.

 
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 14:18:41 -0400
Subject: RE Bill C-21 Need I say that I am a fan of Hon. Christine Tell today???
To: ministercpps@gov.sk.ca, rod.giltaca@firearmrights.ca,
mloberg@loberg-law.com, "Marco.Mendicino"
<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, ministryofjustice
<ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Nathalie.G.Drouin"
<Nathalie.G.Drouin@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
pm@pm.gc.ca, "kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca>, premier
<premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of the
Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, PREMIER
<PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nt.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.bc.ca>, "pierre.poilievre" <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>,
"jagmeet.singh" <jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, "Bill.Blair"
<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, rob.moore@parl.gc.ca, rokaku8
<rokaku8@gmail.com>, sterchi@dbblaw.com,
tracey.wilson@firearmrights.ca, tlawrason@mdprovost.ca,
 

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2022/11/things-got-crazy-as-rod-giltaca-spoke.html


Sunday, 6 November 2022

Things got CrAzY as Rod Giltaca spoke to the Public Safety Committee on Bill C-21

 
 
 
 
 

Question Period – December 2, 2022

Witness all the action in the House of Commons as Canada’s elected officials debate the issues of the day.
 
 

Hon. Christine Tell

Title Minister
Organization Minister's Office

Ministry of Corrections, Policing and Public Safety
Telephone Number 306-787-0284
FAX 306-787-4304
Email ministercpps@gov.sk.ca
Mailing Address Room 345, 2405 Legislative Drive, Regina, SK, S4S 0B3
 

Daniel Rozdilsky

Title Chief of Staff
Organization Minister's Office

Ministry of Corrections, Policing and Public Safety
Telephone Number 306-787-0526
FAX 306-787-4304
Email daniel.rozdilsky@gov.sk.ca
 
 
 

Provincial government tables legislation in an effort to push back against federal amendments to Bill C-21

By Vanese M. Ferguson
news@saskatoonmedia.ca
 Dec 1, 2022 | 11:17 AM
 


C-21 amended to include semi auto ban

BREAKING - New Massive Long Gun Bans Brought by the Liberal/NDP/Bloc Coalition 

Today the Liberal/NDP/Bloc coalition government broke the glass on a typical Liberal distraction tool – gun bans. With Canadians reeling from a failed economy, tripling of taxes looming, 1.5M Canadians using foodbanks, hospitals overwhelmed with sick children who can’t even get Tylenol, Chinese interference in elections and of course a terrible showing at the Public Order Emergency Commission, the Liberals needed the media and Canadians in general talking about something other than their failures. 

 
 
 

With Saskatchewan Firearms Act, province pushes back against federal gun control

Act aims to restrict provincial and municipal agencies from receiving federal funding for seizing firearms

Saskatchewan has introduced a new piece of legislation it says is aimed at protecting law-abiding firearms owners. 

The Saskatchewan Firearms Act passed first reading on Thursday. 

A news release from the province touts the bill as establishing a "provincial firearms regulatory system that will promote the safe and responsible use of firearms" and expanding the role of the Saskatchewan Firearms Office in prosecuting non-violent regulatory firearms offences.

But under questioning from the media, provincial Minister of Corrections, Policing and Public Safety Christine Tell described a bill designed to push back against the federal government's expansion of gun control in Canada

"It is addressing the challenges that we're facing," Tell said on Thursday.

She said the provincial government has concerns about the federal firearm buyback program. In May 2020, the federal government passed an order in council banning 1,500 assault-style firearms and certain components of newly prohibited firearms.

It announced an amnesty until October 2023 to give owners of the firearms time to comply with the law.

Tell has already sent a letter to the Saskatchewan RCMP's commanding officer Rhonda Blackmore, stressing that Tell did not want provincial policing resources involved in the federal program. Federal Minister of Public Safety Marco Mendicino has described that position as reckless and an "abdication" of the vital responsibility to keep citizens safe. 

On Thursday, Tell gave media more details on how the province might prevent the use of police resources, saying part of the new legislation would restrict provincial and municipal agencies in the province.

"They cannot receive money from the federal government to confiscate firearms. So that is in there," she said.

Tell admitted that RCMP — which is contracted to serve as the provincial police force until 2032 — can be directed by Ottawa to seize firearms. 

"Bearing in mind that we as a province fund the RCMP to the tune of 70 per cent, it could even get more interesting," she said. 

When asked whether that could include defunding the RCMP, Tell said all options were on the table. 

Tell also said any agent of the federal government that is going to confiscate someone's firearm will be required to get licensed by the Chief Firearms Officer of Saskatchewan. 

The new piece of legislation will also ensure the "fair compensation of any firearms being seized," according to the provincial government.

Tell said the new legislation will also require forensic and ballistic testing of all seized firearms before they are destroyed.

As for how that may effect the storage of firearms, Tell said that is on the federal government.

The province is also funding a new ballistics lab — the first of its kind in Saskatchewan. It will assist police as they investigate firearms-related crimes, but may also be used for the testing that will be required under the new legislation. 

Tell dismissed concerns the new lab may soon be jammed up with the required testing of seized firearms. 

"I think that the priority of the people of the province is to ensure people who commit crimes with firearms are actually investigated," she said. 

Nicole Sarauer, the Opposition NDP's justice critic, said her party had not had a lot of time to review the bill, but that it would be given the proper scrutiny.

"There's some provisions in there around criminality aspects, that we just want to make sure that this will pass constitutional muster," Sarauer said.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Alexander Quon is a reporter with CBC Saskatchewan based in Regina. After working in Atlantic Canada for four years he's happy to be back in his home province. He has previously worked with the CBC News investigative unit in Nova Scotia and Global News in Halifax. Alexander specializes in data-reporting, COVID-19 and municipal political coverage. He can be reached at: Alexander.Quon@cbc.ca.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
 

YO Michael A. Loberg remember me now?

Randy Turner

<randy@directactions.ca>
Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 9:40 PM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Hi David,
How are you?

Thanks for the call earlier.  
Was in a meeting with some corporate lawyers.  Trying to get some ammo to help navigate these firearms waters.  

Thanks for the call.  
Thanks for this info.  

Shared on my social media feeds.  

Will send a post in the coming days.  
Just been full throttle providing training the last 7 weeks straight! 

Be well.  
Remain strong.  
Always stay in the fight!!

Randy 
--
Randy Turner
Owner/Operations
Direct Action Combat Performance
http://www.directactions.ca
randy@directactions.ca
(613)222-2692



Thursday, 1 December 2022

Premier Ford's 'shoulder to shoulder' comment about Trudeau annoys some Conservatives

YO Trudeau Methinks Ford's 'shoulder to shoulder' comment with you annoyed legions of Conservatives but only Karen Vecchio allowed CBC to quote her words N'esy Pas?


Woodstock Pistol & Rifle Club Inc

<wprc2005@gmail.com>
Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 1:03 PM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Hi David,

Please remove our address from your distribution list. 

Thank-you. 
--
Jeff YOUNG
Treasurer & Membership Secr'y 
{2014-2015; 2016-2017; 2018-2019; 2020-2021; 2022-2023}

WOODSTOCK PISTOL & RIFLE CLUB INC.

T: +1 (506) 471-8245


We respect your right to privacy. Should you wish to stop receiving email correspondence from Woodstock Pistol & Rifle Club Inc., please reply to this email and your name will be promptly removed from our email directory.
 
 
 
 
May be an image of 5 people, people standing and outdoors
Woodstock Pistol and Rifle Club president Floyd Burpee presents Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights vice president of public relations Tracey Wilson with a WPRC hat. (Maridel Farrell photo)
 
 
Woodstock Pistol and Rifle Club first vice president Maridel Farrell, left, stands with Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights vice president of public relations Tracey Wilson. (Submitted by Maridel Farrell)

 
 

Welcome to the Official Site of the Woodstock Pistol & Rifle Club Inc.

NOTICE: Effective immediately, wprc2005@gmail.com is no longer controlled by the WPRC Executive, and therefore not the official account of the Woodstock Pistol & Rifle Club Inc. We also do not have control of Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube. Please disregard any emails from this account. Going forward, you will receive emails from woodstockpistolandrifle@gmail.com.

Sincerely,
Floyd Burpee – President
Jamie Williams – Past President
Rocky Patterson – 1st Vice President
Blaine Tompkins – 2nd Vice President


The WPRC has been active in the Upper St. John River Valley for many years. More recently, as a result of the dedication and hard work of many individuals, our Club has experienced a resurgence in activities and membership including a major range renovation in 2015. We now have a 200m range; a Skeet Range; and three 15m bays with multiple shooting lanes for handgun; shotgun; and rifle.

We have an active membership and we are proud to host a Youth Program as well as an increasingly active IPSC Club.

The Woodstock Pistol & Rifle Club Inc. is a proud member of The Royal New Brunswick Rifle Association and has several members who have participated in the RNBRA Range Safety Officer Training and Certification (RSO) Program, provided under the auspices of The Royal New Brunswick Rifle Association.

The Woodstock Pistol & Rifle Club is proud to support the important work of both the CSSA as well as the CCFR.

We hope that you become a member and are active in the sport we all love.

~ Club Executive

 
 
 

Intro

The Woodstock Pistol & Rifle Club has been active in the Upper Saint John River Valley for many year
Page · Sports & Recreation Venue
209 Hodgdon Road, Woodstock, NB, Canada, New Brunswick
wprc2005@gmail.com
November 22 at 10:22 AM  
 
For the benefit of those who pay attention to this sort of thing…
~JDY
 

 
 
 
3 Comments
 
 
David Raymond Amos
HMMM
 
 
Notice of Meeting - SECU (44-1) - No. 49 - House of Commons of Canada
OURCOMMONS.CA
Notice of Meeting - SECU (44-1) - No. 49 - House of Commons of Canada

Ken Mann
Yep, he was right. The laws to live an honest good life, be a good citizen are no longer a factor in the Liberal/NDP communist style government
 
 
 

David Amos

<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 4:01 AM
To: scott.carpenter@firearmrights.ca, info@firearmrights.ca, media@firearmrights.ca, michel.perez@firearmrights.ca, kelly.wheaton@firearmrights.ca, kelly.kincaid@firearmrights.ca, mark.michie@firearmrights.ca, scott.bell@firearmrights.ca, wprc2005@gmail.com, info@invictus-specialities.com, kelvinswinimer@hotmail.com, info@theshootingcentre.com, cameronarms@hotmail.com, huntfuelcoffee@gmail.com, stadlerlj@aol.com, sales@theshootingedge.com, mts@kitalphaeng.com, wcammosales@gmail.com, "Mike.Comeau" <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, "Matthew.Green" <Matthew.Green@parl.gc.ca>, nsinvestigators <nsinvestigators@gmail.com>, NightTimePodcast <NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "John.Williamson" <John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, randy.macdonald@firearmrights.ca, sales@freedomventures.ca, paulpalango <paulpalango@protonmail.com>, "warren.mcbeath" <warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Bcc: myson333 <myson333@yahoo.com>
 
 

David Amos

<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 7:42 PM
To: sterchi@dbblaw.com, tracey.wilson@firearmrights.ca, tlawrason@mdprovost.ca, ken.allen@firearmrights.ca, sandro.abballe@firearmrights.ca, rfgl.info@sasktel.net, info@dcgunsmith.ca, quadbadventures@hotmail.com, info@capitalbd.ca, info@thegundealer.ca, info@ltt-tactical.ca, randy@directactions.ca, performance@johndzurka.ca, bprill@blplaw.ca, info@targetsportscanada.com, doug@marchscopes.ca, sales@marstar.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, rob.moore@parl.gc.ca, rokaku8 <rokaku8@gmail.com>


 

Sunday, 6 November 2022

Things got CrAzY as Rod Giltaca spoke to the Public Safety Committee
on Bill C-21


Attn Michael Loberg RE Firearms and Federal Court

David Amos

<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 5:49 PM
To: mloberg@loberg-law.com, "Marco.Mendicino" <Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, Richard.Evans@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Nathalie.G.Drouin" <Nathalie.G.Drouin@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca, "kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nt.ca>, premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, "pierre.poilievre" <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, "jagmeet.singh" <jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, rod.giltaca@firearmrights.ca


 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gor_MlIFkkc&ab_channel=cpac

 


Gun lobby group holds news conference on firearm regulations and Bill C-21 – November 30, 2022

On Parliament Hill, representatives from the Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights (CCFR) raise concerns about an amendment to the federal government’s gun control bill, C-21, that was proposed by Liberal MP Paul Chiang on the House Public Safety Committee. Taking part in the news conference are Rod Giltaca (CEO of the organization) and Tracey Wilson (vice-president of public relations).

 

Need I say I called again just after their latest speech???

 https://firearmrights.ca/who-we-are/

 

https://firearmrights.ca/contact/

P.O. Box 91572
Mer Bleu PO
Ottawa, On
K1W 0A6

PHONE

1-844-243-CCFR (2237)

08:00-16:00 Eastern time zone, Monday to Friday.

 


https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2022/11/alberta-justice-minister-calls-for.html


Thursday, 24 November 2022

Alberta justice minister calls for firing of RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki



Alberta justice minister calls for RCMP commissioner to be fired

CBC News

 3.21M subscribers
8,584 views Nov 23, 2022
The Power & Politics panellists weigh in on Alberta Justice Minister
Tyler Shandro's calls for the federal government to fire RCMP
Commissioner Brenda Lucki. The minister said Lucki's continued tenure
is damaging to the national police force.

113 Comments


David Amos
Methinks Alberta Should review our emails and my blogs N'esy Pas?


 

 

Bill C-21 Now Explicitly Targets Farmers & Hunters

51.7K subscribers

Rob Moore says what most Canadians think about gun control bill C-21 while Marco Mendicino claims it will 'end gun violence once and for all.' The Truth: The latest amendment hurts only Canadian farmers & hunters. 

Like what we do? Support us! 

Become a 𝐂𝐂𝐅𝐑 𝐌𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 & contribute to the 𝐂𝐂𝐅𝐑 𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐥 𝐟𝐮𝐧𝐝! 𝐋𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐥 𝐅𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐈𝐧𝐟𝐨 

Online: https://www.firearmrights.ca 

E-Transfer: finance@firearmrights.ca 

By Mail: 

Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights P.O. Box 91572 RPO Mer Bleu Orleans, Ontario K1W 0A6 

 #shorts #cdnpoli #politics #onpoli #canada #ontario #quebec #manitoba #saskatchewan #alberta #britishcolumbia #newbrunswick #novascotia #pei #newfoundland #northwestterritories #nunavut #yukon #insta #instagram #ig #igdaily #instadaily #instagood #watch #video #viral #viralvideos #reels #viralreels #freedom #free #trudeau #trudeaumustgo #ccfr #firearms #guns #property #legal #law #viralvideo #best #politics #viralvideo #freespeech #censorship #listen #new #news #marcomendicino #billc21 #c21

 

Methinks Rob Moore is echoing my words from 2004 N'esy Pas?

 

http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/2005/09/sussex-gold-found-and-bernard-lords.html 

 

Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd

By Erin Hatfield

"If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your world is all screwed up, rearrange it."

The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if unofficial, theme song for the debate.

The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn. Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty, mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.

The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.

Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices. Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each other on their answers and criticizing eachothers’ party leaders. Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."

Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.

The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According to Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and second readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted, at final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to register sex offenders rather than register the property of law abiding citizens."

The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.

Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You’re out of touch," Armstrong yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time, anyplace," Armstrong responded.

As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate, candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making process for the June 28 vote.

Cutline – David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his favourite possessions—motorcycles.
 

 

 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXMfWsoCsVE&ab_channel=CCFR

 

CCFR at SECU - Liberals Lose Control (Rod Giltaca witness testimony at Public Safety Committee C-21)

46.4K subscribers
Things got CrAzY as Rod Giltaca spoke to the Public Safety Committee on Bill C-21. As you know, we have the federal government in court and have worked tirelessly, poking holes in this terrible legislation for months. Certain MP's couldn't hold back their anger any longer, but the CCFR didn't back down. 
 
We did what we do best: Present facts, logic, and demanded government prove their case by providing actual data to support claims made by their Safety Minister Marco Mendicino. 
 Spoiler alert: They still haven't. - 
 
Edited for easier viewing for our Members. - 
 
Index provided below to skip to desired locations. 
 
𝐌𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐝𝐞𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐬: https://www.ourcommons.ca/DocumentVie... 
𝐆𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐬 Rod Giltaca, Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights 
Dr. Atul Kapur, Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 
𝐎𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 02:45
Introductions (Chair) 04:05
Dr. Atul Kapur 10:19
Rod Giltaca 𝐂𝐫𝐨𝐬𝐬 𝐄𝐱𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 15:37
Dane Lloyd [CPC] 21:56
Taleeb Noormohamed [LPC] 28:53
Kristina Michaud [BQ] 35:08
Alistair MacGregor [NDP] 42:39
Tako van Popta [CPC] 47:41
Pam Damoff [LPC] 52:43
Kristina Michaud [BQ] 56:12
Alistair MacGregor [NDP] 01:00:00 - Closing 
 
 Like what we do? 
 
Support us! Become a 𝐂𝐂𝐅𝐑 𝐌𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 & contribute to the 𝐂𝐂𝐅𝐑 𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐥 𝐟𝐮𝐧𝐝! 
𝐌𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩 Join: https://firearmrights.ca/membership-i... 
 
𝐋𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐥 𝐅𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐈𝐧𝐟𝐨 Online:  
 
E-Transfer: 
finance@firearmrights.ca 
 
By Mail: 
Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights 
P.O. Box 91572 RPO Mer Bleu 
Orleans, Ontario K1W 0A6 
 
 
YO Rod Giltaca Whereas you don't call and you don't write Hence you don't love me EH?
 
 
 

Michael Loberg Profile

Meet Michael Loberg

Michael Loberg practices in the areas of commercial litigation and dispute resolution, insolvency and restructuring.

Graduating from the University of Alberta Faculty of Law in 1998, Michael was admitted as a Barrister & Solicitor in Alberta in 1999, an Attorney-at-Law in the Cayman Islands in 2006, and a Solicitor of the High Court of England & Wales in 2008 (active in Alberta only).

Michael’s insolvency and restructuring experience includes acting for institutional creditors, trustees/monitors and corporate debtors in Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act proceedings, implementing work-outs, receiverships, restructurings and liquidations.

Michael’s Canadian insolvency representations have included acting in the receivership of K2 Developments Ltd., the receivership and bankruptcy of Victoria Park Limited Partnership, the proposal proceedings of First Capital Management, the Bear Mountain Resort CCAA proceedings and related actions, the receivership of F.A. Millar Investments, the Skyreach Equipment Ltd. restructuring and various other insolvency and restructuring engagements.

Michael’s international insolvency and litigation representations include complex multi-jurisdictional commercial litigation with particular emphasis on financial, securities and derivatives litigation, corporate and partnership litigation, fraud recovery and related remedies, international and domestic enforcement of judgments, and dealing with related recovery issues. Representations have included acting for the Turkish Savings Deposit Insurance Fund in respect of embezzled funds held in a Cayman Islands trust, acting in the matter of the Estate of Anders Jahre regarding a $250 million breach of trust claim, representing HRH Prince Jefri of Brunei in various corporate proceedings in the Cayman Islands, as well as various engagements relating to the liquidations of off-shore hedge funds.  

Contact Michael Loberg

Main:   +1 (403) 457-6680

Direct: +1 (403) 668-6561

Fax:     +1 (403) 668-6505

E-mail:  mloberg@loberg-law.com



 

 


Alberta justice minister discusses response to federal gun-control bill – September 26, 2022

Tyler Shandro, Alberta’s minister of justice, discusses the province’s response to federal legislation that would freeze the sale, purchase or transfer of handguns in Canada. He is joined at the news conference in Calgary by Teri Bryant, the province’s chief firearms officer.

 



https://www.fraserinstitute.org/blogs/trudeau-government-targets-law-abiding-gunowners-again


Trudeau government targets law-abiding gunowners, again

Trudeau government targets law-abiding gunowners, again

This week, in a move that stunned gunowners across Canada, the Trudeau government unveiled several new amendments to Bill C-21, first introduced earlier this year, which if passed in the House of Commons will represent the largest gun ban in Canadian history.

The proposed amendments prohibit all semi-automatic rifles and shotguns “capable of discharging centre-fire ammunition in a semi-automatic manner and that is designed to accept a detachable cartridge magazine with a capacity greater than five cartridges”—in other words, most firearms used by hunters in Canada. If the amendments become law, millions of Canadians will instantly possess illegal firearms, which—if not handed over to government officials—will be confiscated.

The government has made this move, which will do basically nothing to address gun crime, during a wave of gun violence. So far this year, there have been 351 shootings in Toronto alone, with 41 people killed. According to the Toronto Police Service, most guns used in violent crime in Toronto—mainly certain types of handguns prohibited in Canada—are smuggled into the country.

Of course, this latest attempted gun ban is part of larger trend. In a few short years, the Trudeau government has mandated the confiscation of more than one million firearms, with a total value of more than $4.0 billion, all owned by law-abiding Canadians. These confiscations are based entirely on vague claims about potential threats to public safety, will do basically nothing to make Canadians safer, and target guns not criminals.

First, in 2020 the government issued an “Order-in-Council”—basically a decision by the prime minister and his cabinet, without parliamentary debate—to ban all so-called “assault-style” firearms. In reality, these firearms are simply military-looking semi-automatic rifles and shotguns, which have been popular for more than 100 years. But they are now prohibited and must be surrendered to the government before the amnesty expires in October 2023. It’s unclear how many firearms the ban covers—estimates vary from 150,000 to more than 500,000, with a value estimated at around $2.0 billion. This estimate includes almost $1.0 billion in inventory losses that retailers will suffer due to stock that can’t be sold or returned to suppliers.

Then in 2022, the Trudeau government (again, via an Order-in-Council) announced a “national freeze” on handgun sales, effectively rendering approximately one million legal firearms (valued at more than $1.0 billion) worthless. The freeze prohibits the legal sale or inheritance of almost all handguns and requires them to be surrendered without compensation when the owner passes away. The government’s decision, if maintained, will eventually eliminate target sports and put many fish-and-game clubs under severe financial pressure because they rely on target sports for much of their income. The government will allow special permits for a small number of Olympic competitors, security guards, and wilderness activities such as trapping.

Taken together, with two strokes of the pen, the Trudeau government has sought to confiscate more than $3.0 billion of private property from law-abiding Canadians while simultaneously likely bankrupting hundreds of small businesses and about one-third of Canada’s firearm industry. And if this week’s amendments to Bill C-21 become law, these numbers will surely rise.

So why is the Trudeau government doing this? Will this crackdown on law-abiding gunowners make Canadians more safe?

Simply put, no. Peer-reviewed research shows that previous legislation prohibiting the possession and acquisition of certain firearms made no discernable impact on the rates of homicide, spousal homicide or suicide in Canada or other countries. Bans of short-barrelled handguns, semi-automatic or military-looking firearms have also had no demonstrable beneficial effect on homicide rates.

Moreover, according to testimony by the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police and other police representatives at the House of Commons Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security (SECU), both the freeze on handgun sales and buy-back of so-called assault firearms are misdirected and this money would be better spent tackling illegal guns in the hands of criminals rather than collecting hundreds of thousands of lawfully-owned firearms. Again, most guns used in violent crime in Toronto are smuggled. Border guards testified that due to gaping holes in Canada’s border security, guns could easily slip through unless new technology and new funding were provided. Available statistics strongly support these testimonies.

Some claim that the availability of firearms poses a risk to women. However, Statistics Canada studies repeatedly find that firearms are rarely involved in domestic violence cases (less than 1 per cent) even though at least one-quarter of all households in Canada have firearms. Offenders who do commit spousal violence are prohibited from owning firearms. To ensure that applicants for a Possession and Acquisition Licence (PAL)—a prerequisite to gun ownership in Canada—are not spousal abusers, the applicant’s spouse or partner must co-sign the application and may be contacted by the RCMP.

Indeed, there are more than two million PAL holders in Canada; each one has been vetted by the RCMP and is checked nightly for any violation through the “continuous eligibility screening” program. Firearm owners are also exceptionally law-abiding. PAL holders are less likely to commit murder than other Canadians. Between 2000 and 2020, the number of PAL holders accused of homicide varied from 6 to 21, averaging 12 accused per year out of approximately 2 million PAL holders. The number of PAL holders increased from 1,979,054 to 2,206,755 over this same time period, so the annual rate over 20 years was 0.63 accused per 100,000 PAL holders.

Because Statistics Canada only asks about firearm licence status in homicides involving firearms, it’s impossible to know how many PAL holders were accused of murder when firearms were not involved. But the firearms homicide rate for adult Canadians is 0.72 per 100,000—that’s 14 per cent higher than the PAL holder homicide rate of 0.63 per 100,000. And the firearms homicide rate for accused Canadian males is 1.29 per 100,000, about twice as high the rate for PAL holders, 90 per cent of whom are male.

Millions of Canadians own firearms and use them for socially beneficial purposes including hunting, protecting lives, property or target shooting. Hunting and firearm businesses alone contribute more than $5.0 billion to Canada’s economy and support more than 45,000 jobs. Hunters are the largest contributors to conservation efforts, contributing hundreds of millions of dollars to secure conservation lands and fund projects to manage wildlife.

The Trudeau government believes attacking “guns” will win votes and put the Opposition parties on their back feet. Public opinion polls show that “gun control” is popular among voters in large urban centres, with the strongest support found among voters who know the least about firearms or gun laws. Focusing on guns rather than violent criminals lets Ottawa pose as a protector of public safety while doing very little about actual gun crime.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MD394AWybaM&ab_channel=cpac

 

 

Conservative MPs discuss proposed Liberal amendment to govt's firearms bill – November 23, 2022

Conservative MPs speak briefly with reporters on Parliament Hill as the federal party holds its weekly caucus meeting. Glen Motz and Raquel Dancho discuss the proposed Liberal amendment to the firearms bill they say would prohibit hundreds of models of hunting rifles.

 

 

 

 

 
 

Assault-style firearm definition draws applause from gun-control group

Definition was not part of the Bill 21 tabled by the Liberals last spring

The Liberal government prompted both applause and anger on Tuesday by proposing an evergreen definition of a prohibited assault-style firearm for inclusion in gun-control legislation being studied by a House of Commons committee.

The measure, introduced during clause-by-clause review of the bill, responds to pleas from advocates of tougher gun laws who want a definition enshrined in law. It would build on a federal regulatory ban of many types of firearms established two years ago.

Nathalie Provost, spokesperson for the gun control group PolySeSouvient, called the planned amendment "another critical step towards a comprehensive and permanent ban on assault-style weapons in Canada."

She said that while the group needs to analyze the definition and its real-world effect, its preliminary assessment is that it "would cover most if not all conventional assault weapons."

Conservative MPs on the public safety committee swiftly denounced the proposed definition, saying it would expand the existing regulatory ban by outlawing a broad range of semi-automatic firearms.

Conservative public safety critic Raquel Dancho called the measure an act of "all-out war on hunters" in Canada.

"The Liberal government, with this amendment, is moving to ban almost all semi-automatic shotguns and rifles. So we're talking bird hunters — bird hunters use semi-automatic shotguns," she said.

"I am quite shocked."

Conservative public safety critic Raquel Dancho speaks with reporters in the foyer of the House of Commons in Ottawa on Oct. 21, 2022. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)

Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Conservative MP Glen Motz accused the Liberals of paying scant attention to gun smuggling across the U.S. border and questioned how much the new measure was going to cost the government.

"This government says, 'We believe in making evidence-based decisions.' Well, show us the evidence where licensed firearm owners are the problem," Motz said.

The amendment also drew criticism from provincial politicians. Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe tweeted that the change came "without warning" and would affect farmers and hunters.

The amendment shows "the disconnect between the federal Liberal government and legal firearm owners in Saskatchewan," Moe said in his tweet.

During a press conference Wednesday, Alberta Justice Minister Tyler Shandro also criticized the bill, saying implementing its measures would be a "bureaucratic quagmire."

Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino defended the bill Wednesday, saying the government would take a number of factors "into careful consideration" when deciding what will constitute a prohibited firearm.

Mendicino mid-word close up of face Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino speaks with reporters after a cabinet meeting on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on June 21, 2022. (Patrick Doyle/The Canadian Press)

"We're working very closely with the RCMP, we're working very closely with provincial police services, local police services, to understand how best to make this work," Mendicino said.

In May 2020, the government announced a ban through an order-in-council on more than 1,500 models and variants of what it considers assault-style firearms, such as the AR-15 and the Ruger Mini-14.

It said these guns were designed to kill people and had no place in hunting or sport shooting.

The Liberals plan a mandatory buyback program to offer compensation to affected owners and businesses.

Advocates warn of manufacturers evading regulations

Supporters of the ban have repeatedly expressed concerns about manufacturers evading the regulations by introducing new models.

Gun control advocates said an evergreen definition of an assault-style firearm should therefore be included in legislation.

The definition was not in the bill tabled by the Liberals last spring, but the government indicated it would be added before the legislation came to a final vote.

Liberal MP Paul Chiang, who served as a police officer for many years, told the committee Tuesday he had witnessed first-hand "the harms that assault weapons can do to our communities."

"I hope everyone will support these amendments to create a more comprehensive definition of a prohibited firearm and to improve the public safety of all Canadians," he said.

The proposed amendment is to be debated further when the committee resumes review of the bill Thursday.

Liberal MP Pam Damoff, the parliamentary secretary for Mendicino, said the definition will ensure that Canada has a fair and consistent standard on what constitutes an assault-style weapon, and that there will be no loopholes for gun manufacturers.

"While Conservative politicians want to make assault weapons legal again, we remain resolute in our work to make our communities safer," she said in a statement.

Upon introducing the bill earlier this year, the Liberals announced a plan to implement a freeze on importing, buying, selling or otherwise transferring handguns to help stem firearm-related violence.

Federal regulations aimed at capping the number of handguns in Canada are now in effect.

The bill contains measures that would reinforce the handgun freeze. It would also allow for removal of firearm licences from people committing domestic violence or engaged in acts of criminal harassment — such as stalking — and would increase maximum penalties for gun smuggling and trafficking to 14 years from 10.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
 
 
 
Nov 23, 2022

Proposed expanded federal firearms ban: Minister Shandro

Minister of Justice Tyler Shandro issued the following statement on a proposed ban that would affect hundreds of thousands of firearms owners:

“On Nov. 22, through last-minute amendments to Bill C-21, the federal government moved to ban hundreds of new models of legally owned rifles and shotguns.

“The amendments target more than two million licensed Canadian firearms owners, including hunters, farmers and target shooters who collectively own hundreds of thousands of firearms that could soon be prohibited.

“The decision to take this action abandons long-held claims put forward by Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino – namely, that the federal government was only seeking to ban so-called ‘assault-style’ firearms and that they would somehow equitably compensate firearms owners.

“If the amendments are successful, Bill C-21 will lead to the most sweeping and arbitrary ban in Canadian history. The ban will not only be unenforceable but will criminalize hundreds of thousands of Canadians.

“Only two months ago, Alberta took unprecedented action to protect law-abiding firearms owners by announcing our intention to intervene in six firearms lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of the 2020 federal firearms prohibitions.

“Alberta then went further, announcing that we would take steps to seek to prevent the federal government from conscripting RCMP officers to confiscate legally acquired firearms. Alberta was quickly joined by Saskatchewan, Manitoba, New Brunswick and the Yukon.

“With the amendments tabled on Nov. 22, it has become increasingly clear that these actions are not enough. The federal government is clearly seeking to ban legal firearm ownership altogether. In the coming weeks, Alberta will explore all available options to take action.” 

 
Sep 26, 2022

Challenging the federal firearms confiscation program

Alberta’s government will not help the federal government confiscate about 30,000 legally acquired firearms from Albertans.

On Aug. 19, the federal minister responsible for the RCMP requested that Alberta provide resources starting this fall to confiscate 30,000 firearms. Alberta is not legally obligated and has informed Ottawa it will not offer assistance.

Alberta’s government has been advised that the RCMP will be deployed to confiscate firearms under the “buyback” program. Alberta taxpayers pay more than $750 million annually to fund the RCMP as our provincial police service. Alberta’s government expects that no tax dollars or police resources be wasted implementing a program that will not increase public safety.

In order to take action, Alberta has written to the commanding officer of the RCMP in Alberta to advise that, pursuant to the Provincial Police Service Agreement (PPSA), the confiscation program is not an objective, priority or goal of the province or the provincial police service (Article 6.0), nor is such deployment “appropriate to the effective and efficient delivery of police services” (Article 2.3a). Consequently, the RCMP should refuse to participate.

Despite taking this step, the federal government may still direct the RCMP to serve as confiscation agents. To prevent this from happening, Alberta will formally dispute any attempt to do so by invoking Article 23.0 of the PPSA.

“Alberta has been told that the federal government will use the RCMP to confiscate firearms – as they did during the 2013 floods – when the RCMP seized over 600 firearms during the notorious High River gun grab. Actions taken today will seek to prevent history from repeating itself. Further options are being explored and all options are on the table.”

Tyler Shandro, Minister of Justice and Solicitor General

“This ill-advised firearm confiscation program is another misguided step in the federal government’s efforts around the criminal misuse of firearms. I do not believe that law-abiding Canadian firearms owners support these bungled efforts and have no confidence in the capabilities of the federal government to administer such a massive seizure of personal property securely and effectively.”

Teri Bryant, chief firearms officer

Quick facts

  • Article 6.0 of the PPSA allows the provincial minister to set the “objectives, priorities and goals of the Provincial Police Service.” RCMP Deputy Commissioner Curtis Zablocki repeated this in an Aug. 16 statement.

  • Article 2.3(a) of the PPSA notes that: “The Provincial Police Service will not be required to perform any duties or provide any services which are not appropriate to the effective and efficient delivery of police services in the Province.”

  • Article 7.2(a) of the PPSA states that the commanding officer will: “…implement the objectives priorities and goals as determined by the Provincial Minister.”

  • Article 23.0 of the PPSA outlines a dispute mechanism.

 
 Sep 26, 2022

Alberta seeks to intervene in firearms lawsuits

Alberta will seek to intervene in six ongoing judicial review applications challenging the constitutionality of the federal firearm prohibitions legislation.

The province will seek to advance legal arguments that the federal government has overreached with its plans to ban 1,500 models of firearms – the majority of which were previously classified as non-restricted – simply because the “style” of the firearm was deemed to be esthetically displeasing.

An intervener participates in a legal proceeding so they can provide useful and unique submissions regarding the determination of legal issues before the courts. By intervening, Alberta will be able to contribute arguments based on the specific challenges the federal legislation has created for the local law-abiding firearm community.

“The federal firearms ban will lead to the confiscation of 30,000 firearms in Alberta alone. Alberta is considering all options at its disposal to protect Albertans and the property rights they are entitled to.”

Tyler Shandro, Minister of Justice and Solicitor General

Quick facts

  • The current judicial reviews include:
    • Cassandra Parker, Canada’s National Firearms Association v Canada (AG)
    • Canadian Coalition for Firearms Rights et al v. Canada (AG)
    • John Hipwell v Canada (AG)
    • Michael Doherty et al v. Canada (AG)
    • John Hipwell v. Canada (AG)
    • Jennifer Eichenberg et al v Canada
  • Attorneys general have the automatic right to intervene on constitutional matters. On non-constitutional issues, attorneys general must apply for leave to intervene.
 
 

Challenging the federal firearms ban – September 26, 2022 at 1 p.m.

46.9K subscribers
Minister of Justice and Solicitor General Tyler Shandro explained efforts Alberta is taking to address the federal government’s firearms ban. Learn more: https://www.alberta.ca/release.cfm?xI... 
 
Shandro, Tyler, Honourable
Minister of Justice
Office of the Minister Justice
204 Legislature Building
10800 - 97 Avenue
Edmonton, AB
T5K 2B6

Phone: 780 427-2339
Fax: 780 422-6621
E-mail: ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca 
 
 
 

Alberta won't participate in federal efforts to seize prohibited weapons, Shandro says

Provincial justice minister says Alberta will not agree to having RCMP officers act as confiscation agents

Since May of 2020, Ottawa has prohibited more than 1,500 different models of assault-style firearms from being used or sold in Canada.

It has committed to establishing a buyback program to remove those firearms from communities.

Alberta Justice Minister Tyler Shandro says he received a letter from the minister of public safety asking for police resources to begin confiscating firearms starting this fall.

He says Alberta will not agree to having RCMP officers act as confiscation agents and will protest any such move under the provincial-federal agreement that governs policing.

"Alberta taxpayers pay over $750 million per year for the RCMP and we will not tolerate taking officers off the streets in order to confiscate the property of law-abiding firearms owners," said Shandro, speaking at a news conference in Calgary.

Doug King, a professor of justice studies at Mount Royal University in Calgary, pushed back against Shandro's portrayal of the buyback program.

While officers might seize weapons in the course of their duties, no one should worry "that, in rural Alberta, that the RCMP are going to be busting down their doors looking for illegal firearms," he said. 

"That's not going to happen," King said. "I mean, let's be real."

As for telling the RCMP not to enforce a federal law, King said that would be "extraordinarily unusual," and not likely very effective.

Alberta also plans to seek intervener status in six ongoing judicial review applications challenging the constitutionality of the legislation.

The office of Marco Mendicino. Canada's minister of public safety, said in an email statement that the buyback program will ensure deadly firearms are taken off the streets.

"It's very disappointing that Alberta has put out their statement before seeing the full plan," said press secretary Audrey Champoux.

But Shandro's position is supported by Alberta's chief firearms officer.

"I have previously expressed strong opposition to the federal government's plans to prohibit and confiscate some 30,000 lawfully acquired firearms from Albertans," said Teri Bryant.

"The planned confiscations represent a fatal approach to reducing violence in Canadian society and are unwarranted and unacceptable infringements on the property rights and personal freedoms of Albertans."

With files from Paula Duhatschek/CBC News

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
 
 
 

Blair Hagen Mass Casualty Commission Statement

8.81K subscribers
NFA Vice President Blair Hagen statement to the Mass Casualty Commission on September 22nd 2022
 
I just called Blair Hagen again and left another voicemail Correct???
 
  

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Pineo, Robert" <RPineo@pattersonlaw.ca>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 18:28:20 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Rod Giltaca Need I say that I am tired of
all the BS and yours in particular???
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email.

Please note that I am out of the office today, October 18, 2022
attending Court in Bridgewater. I will not be checking my messages.

If your matter is urgent, please call my office at 902-405-8177 and
leave a voicemail for my paralegal, Cassandra Billard or email her at
cbillard@pattersonlaw.ca.


---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 18:27:55 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Rod Giltaca Need I say that I am tired of
all the BS and yours in particular???
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.

There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.

Thanks again for your email.
______

Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

Merci encore pour votre courriel.



---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier <PREMIER@leg.gov.mb.ca>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 18:27:53 +0000
Subject: Auto Reply Premier’s Secretariat
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

On behalf of The Honourable Heather Stefanson, Premier of Manitoba, we
would like to acknowledge receipt of your email.

Please note that this is an automated response to let you know that
your email has been received and that it will be reviewed at the
earliest opportunity.

 Thank you for taking the time to write.

Premier’s Correspondence Team
Executive Council
Government of Manitoba

******************************

*

Au nom du premier ministre du Manitoba, Heather Stefanson, nous
accusons réception de votre courriel.

 Veuillez noter qu’il s’agit d’une réponse automatisée pour vous
informer que votre courriel a été reçu et qu’il sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.

 Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

Équipe chargée de la correspondance du premier ministre
Conseil exécutif
Gouvernement du Manitoba



---------- Original message ----------
From: Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 18:27:54 +0000
Subject: Thank you for your email
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

This is to acknowledge that your email has been received by the Office
of the Premier.

We appreciate the time you have taken to write.

NOTICE:  This e-mail was intended for a specific person.  If it has
reached you by mistake, please delete it and advise me by return
e-mail.  Any privilege associated with this information is not waived.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance.

Avis: Ce message est confidentiel, peut être protégé par le secret
professionnel et est à l'usage exclusif de son destinataire. Il est
strictement interdit à toute autre personne de le diffuser, le
distribuer ou le reproduire. Si le destinataire ne peut être joint ou
vous est inconnu, veuillez informer l'expéditeur par courrier
électronique immédiatement et effacer ce message et en détruire toute
copie. Merci de votre cooperation.

 

---------- Original message ----------
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 15:27:48 -0300
Subject: YO Rod Giltaca Need I say that I am tired of all the BS and
yours in particular???
To: rod.giltaca@firearmrights.ca, "Marco.Mendicino"
<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "pierre.poilievre"
<pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, paulpalango
<paulpalango@protonmail.com>, nsinvestigators
<nsinvestigators@gmail.com>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, premier
<premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier
<premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nt.ca>, "Pineo, Robert"
<rpineo@pattersonlaw.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>,
darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca, Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca, "sylvie.gadoury"
<sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>, "Cyril.Theriault"
<Cyril.Theriault@gmail.com>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
pchamp@champlaw.ca, "hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>,
"Mike.Comeau" <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca,
Bruce.Macfarlane@gnb.ca, marc.martin@snb.ca, kris.austin@gnb.ca,
rokaku8@gmail.com, patrickking <patrickking@canada-unity.com>,
jcarpay@jccf.ca, traversy.n@gmail.com, kingpatrick278
<kingpatrick278@gmail.com>, rick@petersoncapital.ca,
tcurry@litigate.com
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, andre@jafaust.com,
"Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Bill.Blair"
<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/srs-russia-rifle-ban-killings-list-prohibited-1.6622190


Rifle used in recent police killings not on Canada's list of banned firearms


Russian-designed SKS rifle not added to federal government's 2020 list
of prohibited weapons

Mark Gollom, Katie Nicholson · CBC News · Posted: Oct 22, 2022 4:00 AM ET

Calls to add Soviet-era rifle used in Canadian shootings to federal weapons ban

17 hours ago
Duration 2:27
Advocates are calling for the SKS — a Soviet-era, semi-automatic rifle
that was used in the 2022 Innisfil, Ont., shooting, the 2019 northern
B.C. murders, and the 2018 mass shooting in Frederiction — to be added
to Ottawa's military-style assault weapons ban.

The type of semi-automatic weapon used in the recent fatal shooting of
two Ontario police officers was also used in a series of other deadly,
high-profile gun attacks in Canada, including the 2018 Fredericton
mass shootings and the murders committed by the B.C. manhunt suspects.

But the Russian-designed SKS rifle was not added to the federal
government's 2020 list of prohibited weapons, raising questions as to
why it wasn't included.
The type of semi-automatic weapon used in the recent fatal shooting of
two Ontario police officers has also been used in a series of other
deadly, high-profile gun attacks in Canada, including the 2018
Fredericton mass shootings and the murders committed by the B.C.
manhunt suspects. (CBC)

"The SKS, for all practical purposes, is a military weapon. It's
actually still used in militaries across the world," said Heidi
Rathjen, the co-ordinator of Poly Remembers, a gun control advocacy
group set up by the families of the École Polytechnique massacre
victims. "The only reason why it was not covered by the May 2020 [ban]
— is because it's not a modern design. And that is what we feel is a
completely arbitrary criteria that makes no sense."

    National handgun sales 'freeze' takes effect

    Trudeau announces ban on 1,500 types of 'assault-style' firearms —
effective immediately

The weapon was most recently used in the Oct. 11 killing of two police
officers at a home just north of Toronto. But it was also the weapon
used by two teenagers in the northern British Columbia murders that
left three people dead and sparked a nationwide manhunt. As well, the
SKS was used in the 2018 Fredericton shooting spree that left four
people dead, including two police officers.

In 2020, the federal government announced the prohibition of around
1,500 makes and models of military-grade and "assault-style" weapons
in Canada. Those models included M16, AR-10, AR-15 rifles. Since the
announcement was made, the list has been expanded and now includes up
to 2,000 weapons, however, the SKS is not one of them.
No word on why SKS not included in ban

The government has not given a specific reason as to why the SKS was
not part of the prohibition.

According to Public Safety Canada, the prohibition applies to weapons
that are semi-automatic firearms capable of rapid fire, are of modern
design and are available in large quantities in Canada.

The exact number of SKS rifles in Canada is not known, but there's
likely at least a million in the country, said Rod Giltaca, executive
director of the Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights.

The shooter who earlier this month gunned down South Simcoe Police
Const. Devon Northrup, left, and Const. Morgan Russell used an SKS
rifle. (South Simcoe Police Service/The Canadian Press)

But the government may have decided to keep them off its prohibition
list because they are an old design and don't accept large capacity
magazines, meaning they can't be reloaded as fast as other more modern
weapons, according to Blake Brown, author of Arming and Disarming the
Nation: A History of Gun Control in Canada.

On Friday, during the federal government's announcement of a national
"freeze" on the sale, purchase and transfer of handguns, Public Safety
Minister Marco Mendicino wouldn't say whether there were plans to ban
the SKS rifle.

    Ottawa extends amnesty on 'assault-style' firearms, says buyback
program still in the works

    Federal minister calls Alberta minister's pushback to firearm
buyback 'reckless'

Instead, he said the standing committee on public safety is currently
working with all parties to make sure they have "the right policies as
it relates to assault-style rifles."

A statement from his ministry's office simply said they are currently
examining the list of prohibited weapons, but that it was too early to
say what, if any additions, will be made to the list.
Popularity due in part to cost

Experts say the gun is a very popular rifle in Canada in part because
it's considered inexpensive. One Canadian website that sells guns
lists the sale price of a Russian SKS at just under $600.

"At one time they were extremely inexpensive and you had rifles coming
over from former Soviet republics and you could buy them by the
crate," said Windsor, Ont., based firearms expert A.J Somerset.

The SKS was developed for the Soviet Union military in the 1940s,
although they were later replaced by the AK-47, Brown said. The Soviet
Union allowed other countries to produce the SKS, like China and the
former Yugoslavia, which made millions of the rifles.
A.J. Somerset, a firearms expert from Windsor, Ont., displays an SKS
rifle. At one time, he said, the rifles coming over from former Soviet
republics were so inexpensive they could be purchased by the crate.
(CBC)

Many surplus SKS rifles went to the United States during the 1980s and
many ended up in Canada in the 1990s, Brown said.

"It's very available. So for people who want something that's kind of
like an assault rifle, the SKS kind of fits the bill."

They are also not restricted, meaning an individual just needs a
regular firearms licence to purchase one.

"Basically, if you're a gun owner in Canada and you own rifles, you
probably got an SKS. They're just that common," Somerset said.

    Analysis
    When it comes to stopping gun violence, it's all about the border,
critics say

Giltaca, of the Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights, said he doesn't
believe the focus should be on this type of rifle, but instead on
violence in general.

"It needs serious dialogue, not just, 'Well, we're going to ban this
gun,' wait until more violence happens with another firearm, then ban
that one."

Rathjen, the gun control advocate, agreed the root causes of violence
need to be addressed.

"But until that happens, let's keep the lethal weapons out of the
hands of ordinary Canadians," she said, adding there was no reason for
anybody to own a "fully functional assault weapon."

With files from Megan McCleister
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/alberta-assault-weapons-ban-buyback-rcmp-1.6603678

Federal minister calls Alberta minister's pushback to firearm buyback 'reckless'

‘No ambiguity’ about role of RCMP in relationship between Ottawa and
Alberta, minister says
Jade Markus · CBC News · Posted: Oct 02, 2022 5:15 PM MT | Last
Updated: October 3
Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino, pictured during a news
conference earlier this year, said the buyback program will require a
number of partners in the public safety community, including the RCMP.
(Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)

The federal minister of public safety says Alberta's justice minister
is engaging in "political brinkmanship" regarding Ottawa's assault
weapon buyback program — and the RCMP's role in it.

The federal government banned more than 1,500 assault-style weapons in
2020 — now, they're preparing to buy back those weapons.

It's a move that Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino said will
require local police forces and the RCMP.

But Minister of Justice and Solicitor General Tyler Shandro said he's
taking action to ensure the province will not be participating in the
program. Saskatchewan's minister of policing and public safety has
also pushed back, as has Manitoba's minister of justice.

Speaking to CBC's The House on Saturday, Mendicino said he wants to be
clear: the regulation of firearms falls within the exclusive
jurisdiction of the federal government.

He said Shandro is mischaracterizing the program and the RCMP's role in it.
LISTEN | Mendicino discusses conflict over buyback program:
CBC News: The House13:18The firearms program becomes a federalism fracas
Federal Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino joins The House to talk
about the growing conflict with prairie provinces over the federal
firearms buyback program.

The buyback program will require a number of partners in the public
safety community, including the RCMP, to help facilitate the
surrender, the compensation and ultimately the destruction of the
guns, Mendicino said.

"That somehow, by asking RCMP to ensure that we're getting these guns
off of their streets that cuts against the grain of public safety,
it's the opposite," he said. "[Shandro] is regrettably engaged in, I
think, some political brinkmanship which is counterproductive and
reckless."

"There's no ambiguity about the relationship that exists between
Canada and Alberta as it relates to the role of the RCMP … the RCMP is
a federal entity and matters relating to the control management and
administration of the RCMP are within exclusive federal jurisdiction."

    Calgary shootings surpass 100 amid 'shocking' number of guns on streets

    Alberta won't participate in federal efforts to seize prohibited
weapons, Shandro says

Mendicino said his letters to provincial and territorial governments —
which his office shared with the media — were seeking collaboration in
order to implement the program.

"What we got back from the Alberta solicitor general is a political
stunt. He knows full well that matters that relate to the enforcement
of the Criminal Code and the firearms laws are exclusively within the
jurisdiction of the federal government," he said.
'Strong interest in having a fight'

Shandro previously said Alberta will not agree to having RCMP officers
act as confiscation agents and will protest any such move under the
provincial-federal agreement that governs policing.

"Alberta taxpayers pay over $750 million per year for the RCMP and we
will not tolerate taking officers off the streets in order to
confiscate the property of law-abiding firearms owners," said Shandro,
speaking at a news conference in Calgary.
Alberta's Minister of Justice and Solicitor General Tyler Shandro
answers questions at a news conference in September 2021. Shandro said
Alberta will not agree to having RCMP officers act as "confiscation
agents." (Todd Korol/The Canadian Press)

Alberta is exercising existing authorities to identify the
"confiscation plan" as an activity that is not appropriate for the
RCMP to be used for, he wrote in a statement posted on Twitter
Wednesday.

He also said Alberta will seek to intervene in ongoing judicial review
applications challenging the constitutionality of the program.

There's no doubt that the federal government has the power to
implement the buyback program, said Lisa Young, a professor of
political science at the University of Calgary.

"I don't think that the provincial government is actually questioning
the jurisdiction of the federal government to legislate in this area …
the province is using its appropriate role intervening in court cases
that are challenging this on charter grounds," she said.

"There's really no dispute about whether the federal government can do
this. I think the dispute is whether the federal government should do
this."
Lisa Young is a professor of political science at the University of
Calgary. (CBC)

She added that Shandro asking the RCMP not to enforce the program is
different than directing them not to enforce it.

"I don't think that Minister Shandro has stepped over that line," Young said.

As for sharing each letters publicly, and exchanging barbs, she said
the public back and forth benefits both ministers.

    Ottawa offers $1,337 apiece for AR-15 rifles under mandatory buyback program

    Sask. government tells RCMP it will not support federal firearm buyback

"I don't want to trivialize the issue of firearms control, because I
think it's an important issue, but I think that we do need to
recognize that both parties that we're looking at here have a pretty
strong interest in having a fight with one another over this issue,"
Young said.

She said the issue speaks to the base of both Liberals and
Conservatives, but there are fundamentally different values at play.

Mendicino said he hopes to start the program at the end of 2022, and
said it will likely carry through until 2023.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Jade Markus

Digital journalist

Jade Markus is a digital journalist at CBC Calgary.

With files from Helen Pike
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

https://firearmrights.ca/who-we-are/

"Mr. Giltaca owns and operates one of Canada’s most recognizable
training businesses Civil Advantage Firearms Training Ltd. In
addition, Rod is an instructor in good standing with the RCMP Canadian
Firearms Program.

Rod produces and hosts the largest (all Canadian) firearms related
YouTube Channel, the “Civil Advantage Channel”. He is also the
official spokesperson of the Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights."

rod.giltaca@firearmrights.ca


I was told that you do not own this business


https://www.civiladvantage.ca/civiladvantage-class-locations
 
 
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2022 14:33:36 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Attn Michael Loberg RE Firearms and Federal Court
To: rod.giltaca@firearmrights.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 14:18:22 -0300
Subject: Attn Michael Loberg RE Firearms and Federal Court
To: mloberg@loberg-law.com, nfo@csaaa.org, abernardo343@rogers.com,
info@firearmrights.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Michael Loberg
@MichaelLoberg
·
Jul 6
Maybe you can discuss having Justin Trudeau entered in the Guinness
Book of World Records as the Canadian Prime Minister with the most
ethics investigations ever?
https://guinnessworldrecords.com/records/apply-to-set-or-break-a-record
Quote Tweet
Bill Blair
@BillBlair
 · Jul 6
Today and tomorrow, I will be taking part in a virtual Cabinet retreat
to address some of the biggest issues our country is facing. Together,
we will focus on the next steps we need to take to ensure we are
keeping Canadians healthy and safe.
Flag of Canada
 https://pm.gc.ca/en/news/news-r


Contact Michael Loberg
Main:   +1 (403) 444-6935
Direct: +1 (403) 668-6561
E-mail:  mloberg@loberg-law.com

https://firearmrights.ca/en/legal-action-filed-will-you-help/

The CCFR’s General Counsel, Michael Loberg, commented on the CCFR’s
action from his Calgary-based law firm:

“The CCFR is committed to standing up for the rights of law-abiding
firearm owners in Canada, and this oppressive and unfair action by the
minority Liberal government with their irrational firearm ban will not
be allowed to go unchallenged. Today we have brought an application in
Federal Court for the judicial review of these actions, and for
various other constitutional and quasi-constitutional remedies, in
order to test our belief that what the Liberals have done is both
improper and wholly unlawful.


https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/12-gauge-shotguns-firearms-charter-challenge-1.5559402

But the minister's message wasn't well received by the Canadian
Sporting Arms and Ammunition Association (CSAAA)

The group said "sophisticated manufacturers and distributors all over
the world" are still concerned that the new regulations could render
some shotguns prohibited, despite those reassurances from Blair.

"We are not satisfied with a tweet from the minister that everything
is OK as the basis for our whole industry's future. There is lots of
precedent in [Canadian] law and technical language in legal government
documents our industry uses every day that conflicts with this tweeted
response," Alison de Groot, the managing director of the CSAAA, told
CBC.

"We are a $5.9 billion industry in Canada supporting 48,000 full time
equivalent jobs. "So no, a Trump-like tweet is not going to cover it."

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 08:52:58 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Daniel Ciarabellini RE Norman
Traversy's and Gary McHale's Private Prosecutions of Justin Trudeau
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.

Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
office hours, both over the phone and via email.

Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest.
Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.

Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus%5dwww.canada.ca/coronavirus>

If you, a family member, relative, or friend is abroad and needs
assistance, please visit contact 1-613-996-8885, email
sos@international.gc.ca, or visit:
https://travel.gc.ca/assistance/emergency-assistance?_ga=2.172986851.1318157851.1584477702-1658130046.1584477702

Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
as possible.

Best,


MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>

**

Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.


Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
que par courrier ?lectronique.

En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
Sud-Ouest. En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre
bureau que si votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un
volume d'appels extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous
servir par courrier ?lectronique.

 Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
site : www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus>

 Si vous, un membre de votre famille, un parent ou un ami se trouve ?
l'?tranger et a besoin d'aide, veuillez vous rendre sur place en
composant le 1-613-996-8885, en envoyant un courriel ?
sos@international.gc.ca ou en vous rendant sur place :
https://voyage.gc.ca/assistance/assistance-d-urgence?_ga=2.50762217.1318157851.1584477702-1658130046.1584477702

Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.

Cordialement,

Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>



---------- Original message ----------
From: Scott Fenton <sfenton@fentonlaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 21:24:43 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO David Lametti RE Federal Court Rule 55
easily proves that the "Rule of Law" is a myth in Canada Methinks
lawyers working for Huawei's CFO Meng Wanzhou will talk to mow
N'esy Pas Nathalie.Drouin?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Please note that I will be out of the office working between January 6
and 24, 2020 and may not be in a position to respond to any emails or
telephone calls in a timely manner.

If the matter is administrative in nature, please contact Sharon
Tagapulot at 416-955-1611 or
stagapulot@fentonlaw.ca<
applewebdata://BCBD5FB1-59C3-
4600-BEAF-68BABEEF9EF7/stagapulot@fentonlaw.ca>.

If the matter is urgent, please contact Ian R. Smith at 416-955- 0367
or ismith@fentonlaw.ca<
applewebdata://BCBD5FB1-59C3-4600-BEAF-68BABEEF9EF7/ismith@fentonlaw.ca>.

Yours truly,


Scott K. Fenton


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Frater, Robert" <Robert.Frater@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 21:24:36 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO David Lametti RE Federal Court Rule 55
easily proves that the "Rule of Law" is a myth in Canada Methinks
lawyers working for Huawei's CFO Meng Wanzhou will talk to mow
N'esy Pas Nathalie.Drouin?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

I will be in court the week of January 20. I will respond to emails
when I am able to do so.




Here is  little more Deja Vu for Mr Frater to enjoy His former boss
Peter MacKay did answer this lawsuit while he was still the Attorney
General and I was running against his fellow Cabinet Minister  Mr
Moore again Correct Mr Trudeau???


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cFOKT6TlSE




---------- Original message ----------
From: "Butts, Gerald" <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 06:33:26 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: So Much for the Strong Ethics of the Strong
Organization commonly knows as the RCMP/GRC N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. I am out of the office with limited access
to email. For assistance, please email Laura D'Angelo at
laura.d'angelo@pmo-cpm.gc.ca.

Merci pour votre message. Je suis absent du bureau avec un accèss
limité aux courriels. Si vous avez besoin d'assistance, veuillez
communiquer avec Laura D'Angelo à l'adresse
laura.d'angelo@pmo-cpm.gc.ca



---------- Original message ----------
From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 01:00:20 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Here is my latest complaint about the SEC,
Banksters and Taxmen
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.

This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
message will be carefully reviewed.

To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.

Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future
correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write
directly to the Department of Justice at mcu@justice.gc.ca or call
613-957-4222.

Thank you

-------------------

Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
Vancouver Granville.

Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.

Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
votre adresse et votre code postal.

Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.

Merci


---------- Original message ----------
From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:20:44 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : Hey before you Red Coats swear an Oath
to the Queen and the 42nd Parliament begins perhaps the turncoat Big
Bad Billy Casey the Yankee carpetbagger David Lutz or some Boyz from
NB should explain this lawsuit to you real slow.
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
lalanthier@hotmail.com

Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca

Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
lalanthier@hotmail.com

To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca

Thank you,

Merci ,




---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 16:34:07 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Here is my latest complaint about the SEC, Banksters and Taxmen
To: jmwilson@mta.ca, alaina@alainalockhart.ca, stephanie.coburn@greenparty.ca
Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

http://james4fundyroyal.weebly.com/

https://alainalockhart.liberal.ca/


http://www.greenparty.ca/en/content/federal-council-new-brunswick-stephanie-coburn



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:18:04 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Here is my latest complaint about the SEC, Banksters and Taxmen
To: nicolas@allvotes.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,  brendan@brendanmiles.ca
Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Tim.Moen@libertarian.ca,
info@democraticadvancementparty.ca

ENJOY

https://www.scribd.com/doc/281544801/Federal-Court-Seal

https://www.scribd.com/doc/281442628/Me-Versus-the-Crown


>
 > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
 > Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 13:33:00 -0400
 > Subject: Re: Notice of Harassment I am certain that Rob Moore and the
 > RCMP can explain my concerns with questionable lawyers and their
 > actions CORRECT?
 > To: Pantea Jafari <jafari@jafarilaw.ca>
 > Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Tugrul Pinar
 > <admin@jafarilaw.ca>, "mgreene@sgimm.ca" <mgreene@sgimm.ca>,
 > "media@blaineimmigration.com" <media@blaineimmigration.com>,
 > "Sophia.Harris" <Sophia.Harris@cbc.ca>, "Bill.Blair"
 > <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>,
 > "Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
 > <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
, "mark.vespucci"
 > <mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov>, "jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca"
 > <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "carl.urquhart"
 > <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Gerald.Butts"
 > <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
 > <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>,
 > washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki"
 > <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
 > "barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
 >
 > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 > From: Barbara Massey <Barbara.Massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
 > Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 12:28:58 -0500
 > Subject: Re: Notice of Harassment (Out of Office )
 > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
 >
 > I am out of the office until Wednesday, January 22, 2020, and will not
 > be accessing my Emails.  For any urgencies, you may contact Jolene
 > Harvey, General Counsel @ 613 843 4892., or my admin assistant, Sandra
 > Lofaro 613 843 3540..
 >
 > ------------------------------
----------------------------------------
 >
 > Je suis absent du bureau jusqu'au 22  janvier 2020, et je n'accéderai à
 > mes courriéls. Pour toute urgence,.vous pouvez communiquer avec Jolene
 > Harvey, Avocate générale, au 613 843 4892 ou avec mon adjointe admin.
 > Sandra Lofaro 613 843 3540.
 >
 >
 >
 > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 > From: "Moore, Rob - M.P." <Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca>
 > Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:28:33 +0000
 > Subject: Automatic reply: Notice of Harassment
 > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
 >
 > On behalf of the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. thank you for your
 > email. Our office appreciates the time you took to get in touch with
 > our office. Due to the high volume of email correspondence our office
 > receives, below is a guide on how your email will be responded to:
 >
 > Constituent of Fundy Royal:
 >
 > The constituents of Fundy Royal are our office’s priority. Please
 > ensure to include your full contact details on your email and the
 > appropriate staff will be able to action your request. We strive to
 > ensure all constituent correspondence is responded to in a timely
 > manner.
 >
 > If your query is case related (i.e. immigration, CPP, EI, CRA, etc.),
 > consent forms will need to be filled out before your file can be
 > activated. If you have not yet filled out our office’s consent form, a
 > staff member will be in contact with you.
 >
 > If your question or concern is time sensitive, please call our office:
 > 506-832-4200.
 >
 > Event Invitations and Meeting Requests:
 >
 > If you have sent meeting request or an event invitation, we sincerely
 > appreciate the kind request and we will check his availability to see
 > if his schedule can accommodate.
 >
 > Invitations for Fundy Royal are managed in the riding office and
 > Ottawa based events and meetings are managed from the Parliamentary
 > office. The appropriate staff will follow up on your request.
 >
 > Non-Constituent Enquiries:
 >
 > If you are not a Fundy Royal resident, given the high volume of emails
 > we receive, your email will be reviewed and filed as INFORMATION.
 >
 >  If the email is Critic portfolio in nature, it will be responded to
 > as necessary.
 >
 > Again, we sincerely appreciate you taking the time to contact the
 > office of the Honourable Rob Moore.
 >
 > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 > From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
 > <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
 > Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:28:22 +0000
 > Subject: RE: Notice of Harassment
 > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
 >
 > The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
 > correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
 > comments.
 >
 > Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
 > électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
 > commentaires.
 >
 >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 >> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
 >> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
 >> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
 >> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
 >>
 >> Mr. Amos,
 >> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
 >> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
 >> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
 >> of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
 >> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
 >> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
 >> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
 >>
 >> Department of Justice
 >>
 >>
 >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 >>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
 >>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
 >>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
 >>> To: coi@gnb.ca
 >>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
 >>>
 >>> Good Day Sir
 >>>
 >>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
 >>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
 >>>
 >>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
 >>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
 >>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
 >>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
 >>>
 >>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
 >>> suggested that you study closely.
 >>>
 >>> This is the docket in Federal Court
 >>>
 >>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
 >>>
 >>> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
 >>>
 >>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
 >>>
 >>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
 >>>
 >>> April 3rd, 2017
 >>>
 >>> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
 >>>
 >>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> The only hearing thus far
 >>>
 >>> May 24th, 2017
 >>>
 >>> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
 >>>
 >>> Date: 20151223
 >>>
 >>> Docket: T-1557-15
 >>>
 >>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
 >>>
 >>> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
 >>>
 >>> BETWEEN:
 >>>
 >>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
 >>>
 >>> Plaintiff
 >>>
 >>> and
 >>>
 >>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
 >>>
 >>> Defendant
 >>>
 >>> ORDER
 >>>
 >>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
 >>> December 14, 2015)
 >>>
 >>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
 >>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
 >>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
 >>> in its entirety.
 >>>
 >>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
 >>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
 >>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
 >>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
 >>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
 >>> he stated:
 >>>
 >>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
 >>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
 >>> You are your brother’s keeper.
 >>>
 >>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
 >>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
 >>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
 >>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
 >>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
 >>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
 >>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
 >>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
 >>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
 >>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
 >>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
 >>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
 >>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
 >>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
 >>> Police.
 >>>
 >>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
 >>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
 >>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
 >>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
 >>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
 >>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
 >>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
 >>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
 >>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
 >>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
 >>> is no order as to costs.
 >>>
 >>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>> Judge
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
 >>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
 >>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
 >>>
 >>>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
 >>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
 >>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
 >>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
 >>>
 >>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
 >>> most
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> ---------- Original message ----------
 >>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
 >>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
 >>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
 >>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
 >>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
 >>> dudes are way past too late
 >>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
 >>>
 >>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
 >>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
 >>>
 >>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
 >>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
 >>>
 >>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
 >>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
 >>>
 >>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
 >>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
 >>>
 >>> Thank you,
 >>>
 >>> Merci ,
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
 >>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
 >>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
 >>> five years after he began his bragging:
 >>>
 >>> January 13, 2015
 >>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
 >>>
 >>> December 8, 2014
 >>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
 >>>
 >>> Friday, October 3, 2014
 >>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
 >>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
 >>>
 >>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
 >>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
 >>>
 >>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
 >>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
 >>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
 >>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
 >>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
 >>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
 >>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
 >>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
 >>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
 >>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
 >>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
 >>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
 >>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
 >>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
 >>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
 >>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
 >>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
 >>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
 >>> campaign of 2006.
 >>>
 >>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
 >>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
 >>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
 >>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
 >>>
 >>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
 >>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
 >>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
 >>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
 >>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
 >>>
 >>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
 >>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
 >>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
 >>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
 >>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
 >>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
 >>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
 >>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
 >>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
 >>>
 >>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
 >>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
 >>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
 >>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
 >>>
 >>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
 >>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
 >>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
 >>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
 >>>
 >>> Subject:
 >>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
 >>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
 >>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
 >>>
 >>> January 30, 2007
 >>>
 >>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
 >>>
 >>> Mr. David Amos
 >>>
 >>> Dear Mr. Amos:
 >>>
 >>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
 >>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
 >>>
 >>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
 >>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
 >>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
 >>>
 >>> Sincerely,
 >>>
 >>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
 >>> Minister of Health
 >>>
 >>> CM/cb
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
 >>>
 >>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
 >>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
 >>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
 >>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
 >>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
 >>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
 >>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
 >>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
 >>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
 >>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
 >>>
 >>> Dear Mr. Amos,
 >>>
 >>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
 >>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
 >>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
 >>>
 >>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
 >>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
 >>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
 >>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
 >>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
 >>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
 >>>
 >>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
 >>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
 >>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
 >>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
 >>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
 >>>
 >>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
 >>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
 >>>
 >>>  Sincerely,
 >>>
 >>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
 >>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
 >>> Traffic Services NCO
 >>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
 >>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
 >>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
 >>>
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
 >>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
 >>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
 >>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
 >>> tel.: 506-457-7890
 >>> fax: 506-444-5224
 >>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
 >>>
 >>
 >>
 >> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
 >>
 >>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
 >>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
 >>>
 >>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
 >>> ilian.html
 >>>
 >>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
 >>>>
 >>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
 >>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
 >>>>
 >>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
 >>>>
 >>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
 >>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
 >>>> cards?
 >>>>
 >>>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
 >>>> 6
 >>>>
 >>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
 >>>>
 >>>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
 >>>>
 >>>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
 >>>>
 >>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
 >>>> Senator Arlen Specter
 >>>> United States Senate
 >>>> Committee on the Judiciary
 >>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
 >>>> Washington, DC 20510
 >>>>
 >>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
 >>>>
 >>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
 >>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
 >>>> raised in the attached letter.
 >>>>
 >>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
 >>>> tapes.
 >>>>
 >>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
 >>>>
 >>>> Very truly yours,
 >>>> Barry A. Bachrach
 >>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
 >>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
 >>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
 >>>>
 >>>
 >>
 >> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html
 >>
 >>
 >> Sunday, 19 November 2017
 >> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
 >> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
 >> The Supreme Court
 >>
 >> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do
 >>
 >>
 >> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
 >>
 >> Amos v. Canada
 >> Court (s) Database
 >>
 >> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
 >> Date
 >>
 >> 2017-10-30
 >> Neutral citation
 >>
 >> 2017 FCA 213
 >> File numbers
 >>
 >> A-48-16
 >> Date: 20171030
 >>
 >> Docket: A-48-16
 >> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
 >> CORAM:
 >>
 >> WEBB J.A.
 >> NEAR J.A.
 >> GLEASON J.A.
 >>
 >>
 >> BETWEEN:
 >> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
 >> Respondent on the cross-appeal
 >> (and formally Appellant)
 >> and
 >> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
 >> Appellant on the cross-appeal
 >> (and formerly Respondent)
 >> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
 >> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
 >> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
 >>
 >> THE COURT
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >> Date: 20171030
 >>
 >> Docket: A-48-16
 >> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
 >> CORAM:
 >>
 >> WEBB J.A.
 >> NEAR J.A.
 >> GLEASON J.A.
 >>
 >>
 >> BETWEEN:
 >> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
 >> Respondent on the cross-appeal
 >> (and formally Appellant)
 >> and
 >> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
 >> Appellant on the cross-appeal
 >> (and formerly Respondent)
 >> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
 >>
 >> I.                    Introduction
 >>
 >> [1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
 >> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
 >> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
 >> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
 >> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
 >> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
 >> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
 >> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
 >> (Claim at para. 96).
 >>
 >> [2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
 >> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
 >> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
 >> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
 >> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
 >> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
 >> Prothontary’s Order).
 >>
 >>
 >> [3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
 >> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
 >> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
 >> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
 >> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
 >> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
 >>
 >>
 >> [4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
 >> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
 >> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
 >> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
 >> cross-appeal.
 >>
 >>
 >> II.                 Preliminary Matter
 >>
 >> [5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
 >> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
 >> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
 >> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
 >> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
 >> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
 >> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
 >> several judges but did not name those judges.
 >>
 >> [6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
 >> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
 >> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
 >> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
 >> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
 >> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
 >> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
 >> c. F-7:
 >>
 >>
 >> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
 >> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
 >> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
 >> Appeal.
 >> […]
 >>
 >> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
 >> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
 >> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
 >> […]
 >> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
 >> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
 >> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
 >>
 >> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
 >> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
 >> juges de la Cour fédérale.
 >>
 >>
 >> [7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
 >> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
 >> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
 >> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
 >> section.
 >> [8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
 >> that:
 >> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
 >> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
 >> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
 >> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
 >> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
 >> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
 >>
 >> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
 >> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
 >> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
 >> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
 >> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
 >> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
 >> matière civile et pénale.
 >> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
 >> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
 >> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
 >> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
 >> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
 >> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
 >>
 >> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
 >> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
 >> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
 >> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
 >> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
 >> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
 >>
 >>
 >> [9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
 >> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
 >> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
 >> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
 >> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
 >> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
 >> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
 >> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
 >> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
 >> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
 >> appeal book.
 >>
 >>
 >> [10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
 >> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
 >> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
 >> conflict in any matter related to him.
 >>
 >>
 >> [11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
 >> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
 >> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
 >> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
 >> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
 >> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
 >> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
 >> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
 >> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
 >> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
 >> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
 >> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
 >>
 >>
 >> [12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
 >> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
 >> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
 >> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
 >> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
 >> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
 >> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
 >> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
 >> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
 >> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
 >> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
 >> such judge had a conflict.
 >>
 >>
 >> [13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
 >> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
 >> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
 >> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
 >> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
 >> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
 >> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
 >> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
 >> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
 >> was a member of such firm.
 >>
 >>
 >> [14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
 >> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
 >> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
 >> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
 >> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
 >> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
 >> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
 >> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
 >> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
 >>
 >>
 >> [15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
 >> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
 >> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
 >> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
 >> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
 >> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
 >> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
 >> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
 >> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
 >> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
 >> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
 >> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
 >> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
 >> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
 >> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
 >> [16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
 >> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
 >> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
 >> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
 >> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
 >> apprehension of bias:
 >> 60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
 >> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
 >> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
 >> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
 >> reasonable apprehension of bias:
 >> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
 >> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
 >> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
 >> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
 >> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
 >> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
 >> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
 >> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
 >>
 >> [17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
 >> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
 >> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
 >> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
 >> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
 >> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
 >> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
 >> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
 >> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
 >> (4th) 193).
 >>
 >> [18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
 >> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
 >> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
 >> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
 >> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
 >> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
 >> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
 >> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
 >> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
 >> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
 >> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
 >> 27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
 >> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
 >> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
 >> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
 >>
 >>
 >> 28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
 >> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
 >> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
 >> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
 >> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
 >> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
 >> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
 >> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
 >> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
 >> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
 >>
 >>
 >> 29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
 >> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
 >> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
 >> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
 >> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
 >> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
 >> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
 >> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
 >> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
 >> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
 >> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
 >> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
 >> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
 >> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
 >> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
 >> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
 >>
 >>
 >> 30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
 >> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
 >> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
 >> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
 >> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
 >> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
 >> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
 >> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
 >>             To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
 >> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
 >> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
 >> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
 >> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
 >> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
 >> 31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
 >> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
 >> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
 >> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
 >> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
 >>
 >>
 >> 32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
 >> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
 >> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
 >> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
 >> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
 >> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
 >> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
 >> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
 >> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
 >> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
 >> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
 >> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
 >> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
 >> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
 >> events from over a decade ago.
 >> (emphasis added)
 >>
 >> [19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
 >> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
 >> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
 >> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
 >> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
 >> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
 >> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
 >> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
 >> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
 >> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
 >> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
 >> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
 >> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
 >> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
 >> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
 >> Webb hearing this appeal.
 >>
 >> [20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
 >> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
 >> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
 >> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
 >> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
 >>
 >> [21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
 >> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
 >> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
 >> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
 >> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
 >> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
 >> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
 >>
 >> [22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
 >> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
 >> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
 >> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
 >> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
 >> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
 >> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
 >> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
 >> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
 >> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
 >>
 >> [23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
 >> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
 >> to recuse himself.
 >>
 >> [24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
 >> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
 >> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
 >> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
 >> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
 >>
 >> [25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
 >> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
 >> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
 >> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
 >> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
 >> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
 >> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
 >> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
 >> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
 >> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
 >> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
 >> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
 >>
 >>
 >> III.               Issue
 >>
 >> [26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
 >> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
 >> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
 >> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
 >> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
 >>
 >> IV.              Analysis
 >>
 >> A.                 Standard of Review
 >>
 >> [27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
 >> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
 >> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
 >> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
 >> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
 >> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
 >> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
 >> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
 >> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
 >> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
 >> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
 >> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
 >> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
 >> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
 >> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
 >> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
 >> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
 >> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
 >> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
 >>
 >> [28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
 >> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
 >> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
 >> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
 >> interfere.
 >>
 >>
 >> B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
 >> Prothonotary’s Order?
 >>
 >> [29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
 >> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
 >> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
 >>
 >> 17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
 >> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
 >> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
 >> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
 >> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
 >> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
 >> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
 >> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
 >> (…)
 >>
 >>
 >> 21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
 >> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
 >> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
 >> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
 >> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
 >> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
 >> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
 >> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
 >> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
 >> [footnotes omitted].
 >>
 >>
 >> [30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
 >> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
 >> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
 >> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
 >> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
 >> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
 >> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
 >> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
 >> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
 >> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
 >> para. 27).
 >>
 >>
 >> [31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
 >> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
 >> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
 >> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
 >>
 >>
 >> [13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
 >> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
 >> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
 >> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
 >>
 >> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
 >> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
 >>
 >> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
 >> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
 >>
 >> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
 >> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
 >> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
 >> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
 >> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
 >>
 >> [32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
 >> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
 >> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
 >> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
 >> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
 >>
 >> [33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
 >> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
 >> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
 >>
 >> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
 >> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
 >> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
 >> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
 >> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
 >> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
 >> of process…
>>
 >> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
 >> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
 >> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
 >> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
 >> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
 >> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
 >> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
 >> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
 >>
 >> [34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
 >> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
 >> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
 >>
 >> [35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
 >> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
 >> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
 >> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
 >> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
 >> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
 >> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
 >> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
 >> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
 >> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
 >> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
 >> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
 >> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
 >> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
 >> supporting a cause of action.
 >>
 >> [36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
 >> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
 >> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
 >> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
 >> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
 >> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
 >> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
 >> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
 >>
 >> V.                 Conclusion
 >> [37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
 >> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
 >> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
 >> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
 >> without leave to amend.
 >> "Wyman W. Webb"
 >> J.A.
 >> "David G. Near"
 >> J.A.
 >> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
 >> J.A.
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
 >> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
 >>
 >> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
 >> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
 >> DOCKET:
 >>
 >> A-48-16
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >> STYLE OF CAUSE:
 >>
 >> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >> PLACE OF HEARING:
 >>
 >> Fredericton,
 >> New Brunswick
 >>
 >> DATE OF HEARING:
 >>
 >> May 24, 2017
 >>
 >> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
 >>
 >> WEBB J.A.
 >> NEAR J.A.
 >> GLEASON J.A.
 >>
 >> DATED:
 >>
 >> October 30, 2017
 >>
 >> APPEARANCES:
 >> David Raymond Amos
 >>
 >>
 >> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
 >> (on his own behalf)
 >>
 >> Jan Jensen
 >>
 >>
 >> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
 >>
 >> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
 >> Nathalie G. Drouin
 >> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
 >>
 >> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
 >>
 >
 > 


http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/2005/09/sussex-gold-found-and-bernard-lords.html


Thursday, September 29, 2005

SUSSEX - GOLD FOUND AND BERNARD LORD'S OPINION!!!!


----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "McKnight, Gisele" McKnight.Gisele@kingscorecord.com
> > > > To: lcampenella@ledger.com
> > > > Cc:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:53 PM
> > > > Subject: David Amos
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Hello Lisa,
> > > > > David Amos asked me to contact you. I met him last June after he
> > became
> > > an
> > > > > independent (not representing any political party) candidate in our
> > > > federal
> > > > > election that was held June 28.
> > > > >
> > > > > He was a candidate in our constituency of Fundy (now called
> > > Fundy-Royal).
> > > > I
> > > > > wrote a profile story about him, as I did all other candidates. That
> > > story
> > > > > appeared in the Kings County Record June 22. A second story, written
> > by
> > > > one
> > > > > of my reporters, appeared on the same date, which was a report on
> the
> > > > > candidates' debate held June 18.
> > > > >
> > > > > As I recall David Amos came last of four candidates in the election.
> > The
> > > > > winner got 14,997 votes, while Amos got 358.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have attached the two stories that appeared, as well as a photo
> > taken
> > > by
> > > > > reporter Erin Hatfield during the debate. I couldn't find the photo
> > that
> > > > > ran, but this one is very similar.
> > > > >
> > > > > Gisele McKnight
> > > > > editor A1-debate A1-amos,David for MP 24.doc debate
2.JPG
> > > > > Kings County Record
> > > > > Sussex, New Brunswick
> > > > > Canada
> > > > > 506-433-1070
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd

By Erin Hatfield

"If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
world is all screwed up, rearrange it."

The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
unofficial, theme song for the debate.

The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.

The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was
organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage
of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record
and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.

Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
other on their answers and criticizing eachothers’ party leaders.
Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic
relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's
getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."

Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his
party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but
well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am
on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better
places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters
shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.

The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At
one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in
front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the
voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According to
Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and second
readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted, at
final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to
register sex offenders rather than register the property of law
abiding citizens."

The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and
women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman
yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron
spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.

Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy
Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You’re out of touch," Armstrong
yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of
post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged
Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time,
anyplace," Armstrong responded.

As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate,
candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and
fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making
process for the June 28 vote.

Cutline – David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his
favourite possessions—motorcycles.

McKnight/KCR

The Unconventional Candidate

David Amos Isn’t Campaigning For Your Vote, But….

By Gisele McKnight

FUNDY—He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."

Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot—David Amos.

The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife
and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from
running for office in Canada.

One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail
to meet Elections Canada requirements.

When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his
favourite place to do so—Fundy.

Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his
dissatisfaction with politicians.

"I’ve become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he
said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."

The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in
1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he
needed to change his life.

"I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that
sometimes in midlife."

So Amos, who’d lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners
motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952
Panhead motorcycle.

"Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact)
experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you
renew your faith in mankind – you help anyone you can, you never ask
for anything, but you take what they offer."

For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs
and conversation all over North America.

Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son
and a daughter and become a house-husband – Mr. Mom, as he calls
himself.

He also describes himself in far more colourful terms—a motorcyclist
rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed
individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud
Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."

Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his life.

"But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said.
"It’s alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"

Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.

"I didn’t appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door
interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can
call me. I’m not going to drive my opinions down their throats."

And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.

"I won’t take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It’s
not about money. It goes against what I’m fighting about."

What he’s fighting for is the discussion of issues – tainted blood,
the exploitation of the Maritimes’ gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
name a few.

"The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs – fishing,
farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I’m
death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
(NAFTA) out the window.

NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.

Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.

"There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
Don’t necessarily vote for me, but vote."

Although…if you’re going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have
your X by his name.

"I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and
say, ‘what the hell.’"
 
 
 

Stand Up For Your Rights

THE voice for Canadian firearms owners

The Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights aims to be a strong and reputable, public-facing voice for Canadian firearms owners. We are committed to maintaining our current rights and freedoms while continuing to push as a mobilizing and organizational force for positive legislative change.

Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights

Who We Are

Rod Giltaca

CEO and Executive Director
Rod Giltaca is a highly experienced Canadian entrepreneur. His background includes over a decade of international business development in the manufacturing and software industries. Rod has registered intellectual property, founded venture-financed startup’s and engaged directly in business with some of the world largest corporations and government bodies such as Ford Motor Company, AT&T, Johnson Controls International, the United States Navy, Air Force and Marine corps.

Mr. Giltaca owns and operates one of Canada’s most recognizable training businesses Civil Advantage Firearms Training Ltd. In addition, Rod is an instructor in good standing with the RCMP Canadian Firearms Program.

Rod produces and hosts the largest (all Canadian) firearms related YouTube Channel, the “Civil Advantage Channel”. He is also the official spokesperson of the Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights.

rod.giltaca@firearmrights.ca
 

Tracey Wilson

Vice President of Public Relations
Tracey has been on the CCFR team since its inception and was one of the original incorporating directors. As a founding member of the team her role and skills have seen her grow into a powerful, public facing advocate. Tracey is the Vice President of Public Relations for the CCFR, Canada’s only in-house registered gun lobbyist and an avid hunter and sport shooter. Her political influence coupled with her tenacious spirit makes this lady an asset to the team.

Tracey always puts the best interests of the organization and its members first and has a special rapport with the membership and supporters of the CCFR. She brings with her great experience in the inner workings of Not for Profit and governance in Canada. She had an article published in a women’s hunting magazine, detailing her experiences in the mountains hunting with her teen daughter.

As a passionate advocate for women and youth in our sport, she embraces the new shooter and encourages education and awareness. Tracey completed her IPSC Canada Black Badge training and recently attended the CAPS threat-management, Use of Force firearms training. Tracey looks forward to the continued momentum and incredible growth we have seen since our early days.

tracey.wilson@firearmrights.ca
 
 

Scott Carpenter

President & Director for British Columbia

 

Tyler Lawrason

Director, Alberta
I was born and raised in Alberta, and have been a passionate hunter, firearms collector and enthusiast my entire life. I’ve dabbled in a little bit of everything over the years, from handgun silhouette (IHMSA) to long range to hunting and competing with muzzleloaders and BPCR’s.

I have been a proud CCFR member for over five years, and have had the distinct honour of serving as a Field Officer and an Officer of the organization for most of that time in the capacity of VP of Government Relations.

As our organization grows and becomes more influential, I feel it is critical to have our members’ interests represented on the Board of Directors enthusiastically, professionally and with the diversity of experience necessary to ensure that we continue to serve and advocate for law abiding gun owners as effectively as possible.

I have fifteen years of experience in governance and public sector management, in addition to a number of years as a business owner. I believe my skillset has a useful place at the Director’s table, and I feel that my experience and education can provide valuable input on advocacy, governance and financial management that will help continue to guide and evolve the CCFR in a positive direction, while building upon the outstanding work that’s been done to date.

I’ve found my experiences with the CCFR over the years to be extremely rewarding, and have been incredibly proud of how our approach has gained such a significant amount of traction in that time. It has been a distinct honour to be exposed to such a diverse group of people with different interests and common goals, and I’m excited to be a part of our present and future progress.

tyler.lawrason@firearmrights.ca
 

Tyler Lawrason

President

M.D. of Provost
tlawrason@mdprovost.ca
780-753-0726

 
 

Gordon Sterchi

Director, Alberta
Gord has been a proud member of the CCFR since March 2018. Born and raised in Banff, Alberta, Gord is an avid outdoorsman, hunter and sport shooter. He has been a firearms license holder for over 30 years and is a member of the International Defensive Pistol Association and the Alberta Tactical Handgun League. On weekends when he’s not at the rink coaching hockey or enjoying Alberta’s natural wonders while hiking, skiing and fishing, Gord can be found at his wife’s family farm east of Strathmore practicing his target shooting and lending a hand with pest control.

In his professional career, Gord is a partner with the law firm Dunphy Best Blocksom LLP. His main area of practice is in family law as a litigator, mediator and arbitrator, and also practices as counsel for landowners in surface rights matters in Alberta. Gord is recognized by Best Lawyers, the oldest and most respected peer review publication in the legal profession, in the field of family law and mediation. He is a member in good standing with the Law Society of Alberta. He is also currently the Vice President of the Calgary Bar Association.

A long time advocate for gun-ownership rights, Gord was one of approximately twenty Calgarians invited to participate in the “Dialogue on Reducing Violent Crime” engagement meeting on January 23, 2019 with The Honourable Bill Blair who was then the Minister of Border Security and Organized Crime Reduction.
 
 
 

Gordon Sterchi, KC

sterchi@dbblaw.com
  
 
 

Scott Bell

Director, British Columbia
Scott Bell grew up on a hobby farm in a family where he had little to no exposure to any shooting sports. A youthful interest in ‘the cowboy way’ and a Wild West type lifestyle drew Scott to seek out like minded peers and the opportunity to live the dream on the farm. Because of associations with kids from families who were more outdoorsy, at around 10 years old, Scott got an early exposure to firearms, and has enthusiastically spent the last 37 years hunting and fishing all over British Columbia, and being active in many different disciplines of target shooting. Firearm safety and responsible ownership was engrained in him from day one. Scott has always had a passion for the country lifestyle, outdoors, archery, prospecting, and wilderness survival. He was born and raised on Southern Vancouver Island, where with his small family, he still calls home.

To pay the bills, Scott transitioned right out of high school and started his working career in construction, but has also attended the University of Victoria taking Computer Studies and Information Technologies academics. For the last 18 years however, Scott has worked for the Canadian Coast Guard as a Rescue Specialist on board the different Coast Guard ships and vessels servicing Canada’s typically inhospitable West Coast.

Even before the CCFR, Scott openly preached about the need for firearms owners to get involved with organizations actively supporting our hobbies and lifestyles. Scott joined the CCFR in November 2015 and began spreading the word on his own for the need of a responsible and accountable firearms advocacy group, before becoming an active Field Officer. Since then, he has taken on the role of Regional Field Officer Coordinator for Vancouver Island, and can be found promoting the Organization at every opportunity. Scott is extremely enthusiastic about the multitude of new projects coming down the way in the near future with the CCFR, and hopes to be an active participant in the delivery and execution of them.

scott.bell@firearmrights.ca
 

Mark Michie

Director, Manitoba
Firearms have always held an important and growing part in my life. As a youth, many hours were spent on squirrel and gopher control. In university, my first handgun was purchased to pass the evenings and Saturdays away from home. My first of many deer was taken in my early twenties, and now the next generation comes along for the hunt. Seven of my eight children have taken deer here on the farm and 2020 was the first hunting season for number eight!

Training horses for a living, it was only natural that I give Cowboy Mounted Shooting a try, and have thoroughly enjoyed that when I can find the time to get to a competition.

In recent years I went through the process of getting a range approved here at home to help pass on the love of firearms to the next generation and the surrounding community.

In 2017 I became a CCFR Field Officer in Manitoba and have really enjoyed promoting the CCFR and our message to the public. Along the way I have become more politically active, getting involved in my local MP's Electoral District Association as well as repeatedly writing, calling and presenting to various politicians to let them know where I stand on firearm related issues.

I look forward to doing more to mobilize Manitoba firearm owners in the fight for the freedoms that we have been blessed with here in Canada. I'm proud to be involved in the CCFR - the best advocates for firearm owners Canada has ever had.

mark.michie@firearmrights.ca
 

Ken Allen

Director, New Brunswick
Ken lives in Holmesville, New Brunswick, a very rural setting nestled in amongst potato farms married with 3 daughters. He comes from a long line of hunters and fishermen and has enjoyed these activities with his father and brothers from the time he was a small child. Ken's brother introduced him to skeet shooting when he was 14. He enjoyed it so much that he went on to participate competitively for some time.

Ken's firearms acitivities were put on hold when he entered university and later found a career in IT, specifically in application and database development. It was in 2005 when he rekindled his passion for shooting, hunting and reloading. IPSC became a love for him as it was always pushed him to “do better”, learn, and challenge himself.

Ken has been involved with the CCFR since its inception as one of the very first members. He went on to become a field officer spreading the good word and traveling to other clubs, working at gun shows, and delivering pamphlets and cards to stores. Over the years, Ken has always been supportive of the CCFR and its direction, and the way it operates and spreads its message. Ken currently serves as a CCFR director for New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland/Labrador.

ken.allen@firearmrights.ca

Monquart Consulting

225 McElroy Rd
E7J 2J2 Holmesville
New Brunswick - Canada
506 324 4844

Randy MacDonald

Director, Nova Scotia
Randy grew up in a small town in Cape Breton, and started hunting when he was around 12 years old. He moved to Halifax when he was 19 but never owned a firearm until he was in his 30s.

He joined The CCFR in February 2017 and immediately started volunteering as a Field Officer.

Since joining, he has gone to gun shows and outdoor sports shows representing the CCFR in a kind and professional manner. He often takes new shooters to the range and enjoys introducing people to the hobby.

Randy has just recently started a new career and as such has stepped into a new stage of his life. He is excited to be the Director for Nova Scotia and is looking forward to what the future has in store.

randy.macdonald@firearmrights.ca
 

Kelly Kincaid

Director, Ontario
I have been a member and a Field Officer since the CCFR’s inception. I have held many positions within the organization: Field Officer, Regional Field Officer Coordinator, Provincial Coordinator, and I am currently serving as the VP of Special Events. I have helped grow the Field Officer Program in Ontario, volunteering at shows, Ladies Days, and other Events across the Province. I am a part of the Calendar Project and various other Committees within the Organization.

Since COVID-19 has severely impacted my role, it’s important to adapt and overcome. I am an IPSC shooter and Match Director for my club, a Mapleseed Instructor in Training, Hunter, and an overall lover of guns!

kelly.kincaid@firearmrights.ca
 

Kelly Wheaton

Director, Ontario
Working in Public Safety, I recognized that there was a knowledge gap that led to a general misunderstanding of firearm licencing and preventing gun violence within our communities. I agreed with the CCFR mandate that education and a new method of advocacy were needed because the previous efforts were not working.

I became actively involved in firearms advocacy by joining the CCFR when the organization first began to operate and soon became a Field Officer, Regional Field Officer Coordinator and then VP of Women's Programs. I helped grow the women's division by developing and implementing sponsorship of ladies range days across the country. In addition, I am the project lead for the CCFR Gunnie Girl Calendar and, along with the other women's committee members, have seen it become a tremendous success.

I have seen the CCFR grow and become Canada's leading firearms advocacy group. I am proud of the work and accomplishments made thus far by the hardest working team in firearm rights. My goal as Director is to support and implement measures that will foster growth, uplift the organization and support our members.

Additionally, I am a CCFR RSO course instructor, a hunter, an IPSC competitor, an avid skeet enthusiast, rifle marksman and club level ATT instructor. I am also a founding Director and Senior Instructor for Project Mapleseed, a civilian marksmanship clinic here in Canada. I can be heard educating and informing listeners on Slam Fire Radio, and the SHE SHOOTS podcast with the CUSF women's committee.

kelly.wheaton@firearmrights.ca
 

Sandro Abballe

Director, Quebec
Sandro has volunteered with the CCFR as a Field Officer, since August 2016, and during that time he has dedicated much of his time and energy to working with like-minded people in the Field Officer program to protect and enhance the rights and freedoms of Canadian gun owners. He has grown immensely in his knowledge and understanding of not just firearms advocacy and education, but also the sociopolitical environment surrounding the community. He is genuinely passionate about the cause and has made it his goal to help propagate this passion throughout the country, to the point that shooting sports are as commonplace and normal as soccer and hockey.

In his professional career, he is a certified Fire and Egress Door Assembly Inspector as well an Architectural Hardware Consultant. He also has experience working in non-profit organizations and their often-complicated decision making processes, being the Director of the Canadian Eastern Region for the Door and Hardware Institute Canada. As a conservative-leaning individual on many issues, Sandro’s Bachelor of Arts degree with a major in Political Science has given him a valuable and unique understanding of, and perspective on, the social and political issues surrounding gun ownership in Canada. He takes a strong sense of pride in the way his education and upbringing has taught him to evaluate every situation and issue he is facing, weighing the various pros and cons of each, and form a rational opinion based on evidence and sound thinking.

sandro.abballe@firearmrights.ca
 
 514‑778‑7625
 

Michel Perez

Director, Quebec
 
 

Matthew Shirley

Director, Saskatchewan
As a volunteer with the CCFR first as a Field Officer in 2019 and then as a Regional Field Officer Coordinator for the province of Saskatchewan in early 2020, I have had the pleasure of working alongside and getting to meet some extraordinary people. I have also been a Director with the Regina Fish and Game League since 2018 and am quite active with the range.

As Saskatchewan Director for the CCFR I will be able to bring a voice to this province that has been absent the last few years. I hope to be able to work closely with clubs across the province to introduce new shooters to our community, help host women's shooting days, as well as Project Mapleseed events. I hope to help dissolve the stigma that firearms are scary and need to be removed from society. Correcting the media bias and state of perpetual fear that most citizens are stuck in is a major goal of mine. We can only do this by getting people out to see that firearms are not the problem in our communities, but that so much of the issues are actually gangs and social situations which have little to no help in the form of government funded programs.

matthew.shirley@firearmrights.ca
 

Regina Gun Range.

Phone: 306-545-6009
Email: rfgl.info@sasktel.net


YO Michael A. Loberg remember me now

David Amos

<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 5:41 PM
To: mloberg@loberg-law.com, "Marco.Mendicino" <Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, Richard.Evans@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Nathalie.G.Drouin" <Nathalie.G.Drouin@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca, "kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nt.ca>, premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "pierre.poilievre" <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, "jagmeet.singh" <jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:12:40 -0300
Subject: Hence you did not mean what you Tweeted about Justin Trudeau Correct?
To: "Michael A. Loberg" <mloberg@loberg-law.com>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>



---------- Original message ----------
From: "Michael A. Loberg" <mloberg@loberg-law.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 18:38:29 +0000
Subject: RE: A little Deja Vu for Justin Trudeau and Peter MacKay from 2013
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Please don't include me in this stuff.


Michael A. Loberg
Barrister & Solicitor

Direct: +1 (403) 668-6561
E-mail: mloberg@loberg-law.com

Assistant: Tenille Peters
Direct: +1 (587) 390-7335
E-mail: tpeters@loberg-law.com


-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com]
Sent: July-09-20 12:36 PM
To: PETER.MACKAY <PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com>; steven.blaney.a1
<steven.blaney.a1@parl.gc.ca>; Michael A. Loberg
<mloberg@loberg-law.com>; info@csaaa.org; abernardo343@rogers.com;
info@firearmrights.ca; Blair@nfa.ca; Sheldon@nfa.ca; Bill.Blair
<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>; solomon@edelsonlaw.ca;
reception@lacombelaw.com; Tim.cogan@cpc-cpp.gc.ca;
Richard.Evans@cpc-cpp.gc.ca; rob.moore <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>;
barbara.massey <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; Brenda.Lucki
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>; Roger.Brown
<Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>; COCMoncton <COCMoncton@gmail.com>;
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>; Dennis <Dennis@nfa.ca>; Katie.Telford
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>; pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>
Subject: A little Deja Vu for Justin Trudeau and Peter MacKay from 2013

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 20:18:31 -0400
Subject: Yo Stevey Boy Blaney Say Hey to the NFA guys for me willya???
To: Tim.cogan@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, Richard.Evans@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, lgunter
<lgunter@shaw.ca>, "ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca"
<ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca>, solomon@edelsonlaw.ca,
reception@lacombelaw.com, "joshua.skurnik"
<joshua.skurnik@sunmedia.ca>, "Kory.Teneycke"
<Kory.Teneycke@sunmedia.ca>, "roger.l.brown"
<roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Ron.Francis"
<Ron.Francis@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, COCMoncton <COCMoncton@gmail.com>,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, Dennis <Dennis@nfa.ca>,
"justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: Mackap <Mackap@parl.gc.ca>, Sheldon <Sheldon@nfa.ca>, David Amos
<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "Ian.McPhail"
<Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, "steven.blaney"
<steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson" <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>

http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/12/enjoy-ya-bastards.html

On 12/18/13, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://nfa.ca/news/canadas-nfa-calls-judicial-inquiry-high-river-gun-
> grab
>
> Canada's NFA calls for Judicial Inquiry into High River Gun Grab
> Date: Monday, December 16, 2013
> Canada's NFA calls for Judicial Inquiry into High River Gun Grab
>
> "The mandate is too narrow to get the whole truth."
>
> "While the National Firearms Association wholeheartedly supports the
> RCMP Public Complaints Commission extending its investigation into the
> break-in of more than 1,900 High River homes by the RCMP, we believe
> that their mandate is too narrow. The Commission may be able to find
> out what happened, but it is hamstrung by legislative constraints that
> won't allow the Commissioner's investigators to dig deep enough to
> find out why, nor to address the significant question of how such an
> event could happen as it did outside of a police state," said NFA
> President Sheldon Clare, "For that reason, there simply must be a full
> judicial inquiry with a broad mandate to determine what happened and
> why in High River - the problem is far beyond one of police policy and
> procedure."
>
> The very limited mandate of the commissioner is expressed here, and
> reproduced below:
> http://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca/cnt/decision/cic-pdp/2013/cic-pdp-130705-eng.
> aspx
>
> In light of the foregoing, pursuant to subsections 45.37(1) and
> 45.43(1) of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act (RCMP Act), I am
> today initiating a complaint and public interest investigation into
> the conduct of all RCMP members or other persons appointed or employed
> under the authority of the RCMP Act involved in the activities in High
> River, Alberta, specifically:
> 1. Whether the RCMP members or other persons appointed or employed
> under the authority of the RCMPAct involved in entering private
> residences in High River complied with all appropriate training,
> policies, procedures, guidelines and statutory requirements; 2.
> Whether the RCMP members or other persons appointed or employed under
> the authority of the RCMP Act involved in seizing firearms from
> private residences in High River complied with all appropriate
> training, policies, procedures, guidelines and statutory requirements;
> and, 3. Whether the RCMP national, divisional and detachment-level
> policies, procedures and guidelines relating to such incidents are
> adequate.
>
> Clare continued, "It has become increasingly clear that the
> investigation also has to include the role of the Alberta Government
> and in particular the communications between Municipal Affairs
> Minister Doug Griffiths and the RCMP."
>
> Additionally, on page 92 of the RCMP response to one of NFA's eleven
> Access to Information (ATI) Act requests on the issue, it shows that
> in addition to the 223 RCMP officers deployed in High River during the
> flood, there were 310 Canadian Forces personnel in High River, many of
> whom were witnesses to the unwarranted search and seizure operations
> in High River. NFA Director for Alberta, Dennis Young confirmed,
> "During our communications with National Defence in October, we were
> told that documentation does exist from soldiers in response to our
> ATI Act request for records of 'complaints and witness accounts of any
> inappropriate or illegal action observed while working in High River'.
> However, the RCMP Public Complaints Commissioner does not have
> authority to examine these records or interview Canadian Forces
> personnel about what they saw and did in High River."
>
> Lacombe Lawyer Rick Hemmingson, who was featured in the Sun News
> documentary on High River (see link below), provided Canada's NFA with
> several reasons why a judicial enquiry is absolutely essential. "We
> concur," said Sheldon Clare, "and we will be writing the Prime
> Minister and the Premier of Alberta with our request."
>
> SUN NEWS - FULL DOCUMENTARY - BROKEN TRUST: GUN GRAB AT HIGH RIVER
> http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/video/2923814901001
>
> Canada's National Firearms Association is this country's largest and
> most effective advocacy organization representing the interests of
> firearms owners and users.
>
> For more information contact:
>
> Blair Hagen, Executive VP Communications, 604-753-8682 Blair@nfa.ca
> Sheldon Clare, President, 250-981-1841 Sheldon@nfa.ca Shawn Bevins,
> Executive VP, 819-313-2887 Shawn@nfa.ca (français) Dennis Young,
> Alberta Director, 587-360-1111 Dennis@nfa.ca Canada's NFA toll-free
> number - 1-877-818-0393 NFA Website: www.nfa.ca
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 20:10:43 -0300
> Subject: Attn Sgt Sylvain Roussel (403 516 6462) and Sgt Staff Sgt
> Scott Fuller (403 516 6455) Here is the info you seek about High River
> To: sylvain.roussel@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Scott.Fuller@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> Good Day Sgt Roussel,
>
> Trust that messing with corrupt mindless politicians in Alberta goes
> under the heading of fun for mean old me. BTW My records tell me I
> sent you three emails not just one. As per your request you can find
> the original text of the first email to you on August 12th and many
> others below. Believe it or I provided more info after it for your
> benefit and mine as well. I never make false allegations. I only state
> what I know to be true in writng, back it up with documentation and
> let the political cards fall where they may.
> Lets just say
> I have been dealing with questionable Feds in several countries for a
> very long tme. Last week things got rather serious when the CBC
> starting yapping about the President of Brazil and the CSEC etc so I
> made a lot of calls to cover my butt then got gone. I know my affairs
> are complicated but if anyone with two clues between their ears had
> been paying attention and understand politics and the IMF etc then
> they would have easily understood the ramifications of what the
> Brazilian President Rousseff was saying to all the UN dudes before
> Prez Obama spewed a bunch of his usual bullshit on Sept 24th.
>
> http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/07/31/greece-imf-brazil-idUSL6N0G0
> 5GI20130731
>
> http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/24/brazil-president-un-speec
> h-nsa-surveillance
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/politics/story/1.1928147
>
> https://mobile.twitter.com/dilmabr
>
> Sgt Brian Topham may find it unbelievable that I a dumb Maritimer such
> as I may be may be involved. I don't care. Here is a little proof  for
> you that I posted on the Internet about something that went down with
> Brazil and I one month before I called Sgt Fuller and tried to talk to
> Günther Schönfeldt and encountered an evil woman who claimed her name
> was just "Nora". For the record I liked Sgt Fuller and am impressed
> that he asked questions of you.
> But the lady "Nora" is another kettle of fish. She was so nasty she
> did not dare to tell me her last name so doubt if even her first name was for real.
> Our conversation started out ok. However after she acknowleged that
> she still has my files in her records going back to November 18h, 2003
> she saw something else in the file that seemed to spokk her that she
> would not discuss. Go figure. Methinks she figured that your fellow
> members of the RCMP/DND were gonna pounce on me once again and she
> wanted to play dumb. Quite frankly so did I. I have been falsely
> imprisoned without charges twice thus far.
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
> ilian.html
>
> Whether you want it or not the best advice that I can give to the low
> level RCMP members involved in the High River nonsense is to be
> careful that Paulson and his minions don't blame it all on you local fellas in the end.
> Afterall it was your faces and words that were in published the news.
> Unless ou have
> proof the orders came from higher up the food chain they will cook
> your goose in order to protect their fancy arses.
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/i-see-sun-media-dudes-fina
> lly-read-my.html
>
> Trust that I am happy you finally got back to me and glad you were
> honest with me. However I have no doubt your computers tell quite a
> tale about mean old me but a lot of it is very untrue. Lets just say
> there was already a lot of dirty water over the damn between the RCMP
> and I way back in the early 1980's before a lot of your officers
> joined the RCMP and long before the water started rising in High River
> last June. Thus I have very good reasons to not trust cops especially
> when your assoicates ignored my calls and emails on June 29th, 2013.
> However it does not follow that I don't know that there are not decent
> folks within the Queen's Red Serge. Most fella's did not join the
> force to abuse their fellow Canadians but you did swear some oath to
> the Force the most seem to think is more important that upholding the
> law. Hell even I tried to join the RCMP way back in 1970 but I was one
> inch to short to meet its standards back then. Just as Sgt Topham
> lamented a lot changed in 1974. FYI I would not be one bit surprised
> to find out that one of my relatives was helping you guys in High
> River last June.
>
> BTW as soon as it hit the news about the questionable taking of all
> the guns in High River I knew who was behind it. Hell I even let
> Danielle Smith know out of the gate that something was up on June the
> 3rd. I tried to explain it to S/Sgt Fuller when I called him a week or
> so ago but he said he would rather hear it from you Sgt Roussel. The
> dates on my published emails tell a very true tale. Take your
> associate Mr Baconfat's blog with pounds of salt.
> I have no idea what you fellas know and what you don't know about my
> concerns with the RCMP and the DND. I also know that you would not be
> allowed to tell me anyway because of your oaths. You must at least
> agree that the subject line of the email your computer acknowledged
> was a rather telling thing indeed. The Feds in the CSEC and the NAS
> cannot deny that computers owned by the taxpayers can be infinitely
> ethical and that answers comng from them very valuable to us all even
> if you are AOL. Correct Sgt Roussel? Why in hell would you delete my
> emails rather than save it to protect your own butt from litigation? It would have cost you nothing.
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Sylvain ROUSSEL <sylvain.roussel@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 01:51:50 -0400
> Subject: Re: The latest top cop in High River Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow
> and his boss Bob Paulson should be able to explain this email to Greg
> Kvisle and the other pissed off folks
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I am AOL until August 22., 2013. If your message is urgent please
> contact Staff Sergeant Scott FULLER at 403 516 6455
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Garrett WOOLSEY <garrett.woolsey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 04:05:18 -0400
> Subject: Re: I see the Sun Media dudes finally read my email about you
> after a couple months EH Brian Topham? (AOD)
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I am currently away from the office, returning Monday October 14.
>
> As of Oct. 1, Insp. Tony Hamori is Ops Officer for SCB South, ph.
> 403-699-2642. I will be joining Calgary Federal SOC Team 1 and can be
> reached on cel @ 403-519-7308.
>
> Please contact S/Sgt. Scott Fuller for STO related enquiries.
>
> 1 403 516 6462
>
>
> ----- Forwarded Message -----
> From: magicJack <voicemail@notify.magicjack.com>
> To: DAVID AMOS
> Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2013 12:40 PM
> Subject: New VM (11) - 1:04 minutes in your magicJack mailbox from
> anonymous
>
>
>
> Dear magicJack User:
>
> You received a new 1:04 minutes voicemail message, on Wednesday,
> October 09,
> 2013 at 11:40:47 AM in mailbox 9028000369 from anonymous.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: PCC Complaints <complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 21:14:53 +0000
> Subject: RE: Oh my did the Office of the Mayor of High River piss me
> off today EH Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow? Say Hey to Ms Smith at the
> Townhall Meeting tonight for me will ya...
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Hello Mr. Amos:
>
> This e-mail is to acknowledge your recent communication with our
> office about the RCMP.
>
> If you wish to submit a complaint regarding the on-duty conduct of a
> member(s) of the RCMP, you can do so through our online complaint form
> located at:
>
> https://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca/cnt/srv/mac/index-eng.aspx
>
> Alternatively, we can also be reached by:
>
> Telephone : 1-800-665-6878
> E-mail: complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
> Fax : 604-501-4095
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
> Günther Schönfeldt
> Intake Officer / Agent d'information de liaison Commission for Public
> Complaints Against the RCMP / Commission des plaintes du public contre
> la Gendarmerie royale du Canada Tel/Tél : 1-800-665-6878 | Fax/Téléc :
> (604) 501-4095 complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: <eblokland@highriver.ca>; <christopher@diArmani.com>;
> <brian.topham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; <bill.kaufmann@sunmedia.ca>;
> <Josee.Valiquette@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "Dale.McGowan"
> <Dale.McGowan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>; <Sylvain.Roussel@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; <bloke@shaw.ca>; "premier"
> <premier@gov.ab.ca>; "highwood" <highwood@assembly.ab.ca>; "airdrie"
> <airdrie@assembly.ab.ca>; "mclellana" <mclellana@bennettjones.com>;
> <finditherefirst@gmail.com>; <Doug.Potts@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
> <Ian.Shardlow@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "ppalmater"
> <ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca>; "xchief" <xchief@bell.blackberry.net>
> Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>;
> <jthackray@highriver.ca>; <kevin.rushworth@sunmedia.ca>; <abrander@highriver.ca>; "Jessica Hume"
> <jessica.hume@sunmedia.ca>; "greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>; "pm"
> <pm@pm.gc.ca>; "MulcaT" <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>; "justin.trudeau.a1"
> <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 2:51 AM
> Subject: The latest top cop in High River Staff Sgt Ian Shardlow and
> his boss Bob Paulson should be able to explain this email to Greg
> Kvisle and the other pissed off folks
>
>
> FYI I called Greg Kvisle after I saw him on Sun TV he said he didn't
> need any help but he wanted to know who took his guns I told him I
> knew but he didn't believe me. Clearly Ken Braat knows Greg Kvisle and
> the cops very well. He should be able to tell Kvisle who took his
> guns.
>
> http://www.highrivertimes.com/2013/07/29/new-staff-sergeant-to-run-hig
> h-river-rcmp
>
> I bet Harper and the RCMP remembers what this Maritimer said about his
> old 303s and shoguns when I ran for seat Parliament the first time
> after the Maritimers Landslide Annie Mclellan Wayne Easter and a
> boatload of corrupt cops pissed me off. If a don't feel free to scroll
> down N'esy Pas?
>
> I bet Danielle Smith, Bobby Baby Paulson remembers Robin Reid. Clearly
> Insp Dougy Potts and Sgt Ian Shardlow pissed her and a bunch of
> Indians off bigtime last year EH?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: robin reid
> To: bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; pm@pm.gc.ca ; people stand up ;
> david.raymond.amos@gmail.com ; dominic ; calgary.west@assembly.ab.ca ;
> toewsv1@mts.net ; jspottedbear@yahoo.com ; jimsisson@inac.gc.ca ;
> hiddenfromhistory1@gmail.com ; admin@turnervalley.ca ;
> aimggc@worldnet.att.net ; alex@globalmedicaltourism.com.mx ;
> amyrae4@hotmail.com ; archbishop@archtoronto.org ;
> barry.shaw@forces.gc.ca ; bewerbung@rothschild.com ;
> bishopfh@rcdiocese-calgary.ab.ca ; calgary@jasonkenney.com
> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 11:44 PM
> Subject: I SEE NOTHING HAS CHANGED WITHIN YOUR CORRUPT FEDERAL
> ORGANIZATION
>
>
> Bob Paulson,
> Commissioner of RCMP
> Canada.
>
> Mr. Paulson,
>
> I write once again after the disappointing bullshit letter I received
> from Inspector Potts, and then my discussion with Sgt. Shardlow
> yesterday in Okotoks over assaults, false arrest, murder, all kinds of
> nasty things you are responsible for setting people up using your "
> interception of private communication ".
> You people neglect doing your duty here and as I see what is coming
> out in the media, makes one wonder just how much death you have
> covered up over the years.
> Afraid the truth is coming out is what it seems,hmmmm.  And as far as
> your arresting officer Degroot goes he seems to have a lot of contact
> with Juiliann Barna Reid, as I asked Shardlow - does this abusing
> woman work for you????????? Perhaps you could look into this and get
> back to me.
>
> Honestly for men you have no balls, just like Harper - has god got
> your balls also??????? And then you have your women godly agents who I
> am thinking took your balls cuz they are as cruel as you men. Now is
> that not shameful.?????? Just as Alison Redford ignored me when she
> was justice minister.
>
> You people do not care about children, woman or men in your game of
> human abuse for profit. You always have the same excuse.
>
> Now Mr. Paulson, since you are at the top, do you condone these lies
> and abuse of children, woman and men ???????
>
> I do have some other concerns from many years ago involving the
> okotoks RCMP putting the blame on 1 officer, an Indian, are you racist
> Mr. Paulson, do you condone white supremacy and genocide upon the
> Indian people and then every other race by thair own ????? Just as the
> security guard who assaulted me - thair excuse was he just got out of
> security school.
>
> Also Mr. Paulson do you carry the dead peasant insurance upon your
> workers???????? how does one find out if this type of insurance is on
> people and who has used it?????????
>
> And let's not forget the abuse on human life by religion, sit's at the
> top on the abuse game for profit, would you not say???????
>
> Now Mr. Paulson, do you feel this is right what has been done, the
> medical abuse, assaults, false arrests and so much more I would like
> to discuss in person.????????????
>
> REMEMBER IT'S ALL INDIAN LAND THAT YOU PERSONS UNDER THE SUPREMACY OF
> GOD, KILLED CHILDREN, WOMAN AND MEN FOR WHAT YOU HAVE, AND REMEMBER
> INDIANS OF THE LANDS COME IN ALL RACES. SHAME ON YOU ALL CORRUPT
> CHIEFS KILLING CHILDREN IN SO MANY WAYS, ESPECIALLY YOU CONDONED
> PEDOPHILE LAIR.
>
>
> Thank you
> Robin Reid
> Red Nations
> PPOF
>
>
> http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/sunnews/politics/archives/2013/06/2013062
> 8-151342.html
>
> http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/alberta/Hell+Residents+angry+RCMP+si
> eze+guns+from+High+River+homes/8588851/story.html
>
> RCMP revealed Thursday that officers have seized a "substantial ...
> that we control, simply because of what they are," said Sgt. Brian
> Topham
>
> http://www.canada.com/story_print.html?id=29c1b59c-694d-4d33-9fdc-d5a5
> 7f14ec39&sponsor=
>
> Some Alberta RCMP Disciplinary Cases in 2005-06 (Year to Date)
>
> - Sgt. Brian Topham -- reprimand and forfeiture of 10 days' pay.
>
> Topham, who served at the Fox Creek detachment between 2002 and 2004,
> made insensitive and degrading comments about women in the presence of
> a female civilian employee.
>
> On another occasion, Topham said "1974 was the worst year in the RCMP
> because that is when the RCMP let women in the force."
>
> The allegations also involved stereotypical comments about aboriginals
> and people from Newfoundland made in the presence of officers who had
> those backgrounds.
>
>
> http://christopherdiarmani.com/10532/police/abuse-of-police-authority/
> high-river-rcmp-looters-criminals-treated-immediately/
>
> http://www.calgarysun.com/2013/08/09/high-river-homeowner-upset-police
> -entered-his-home-three-times-after-flood-hit-and-seized-antique-firea
> rms
>
> Greg Kvisle. CENTURY 21 Foothills Real Estate. Bldg. F, 1103 18 Street
> SE. High River, ABT1V 2A9. Office: 403-652-2121. Cell: 403-601-3533
>
> Ken Braat Associate,Realtor. Century 21 Foothills Real Estate 1103 F
> 18 Street SE, T1V 2A9 High River, Alberta 403-601-2070.
>
> High River homeowner upset police entered his home three times after
> flood hit and seized antique firearms
> 205
>
> By Bill Kaufmann ,Calgary Sun
>
> First posted: Friday, August 09, 2013 03:42 PM MDT | Updated: Friday,
> August 09, 2013 04:59 PM MDT
>
>
> The RCMP's post-flood seizure of two family heirloom firearms that
> were hidden in his home is an outrageous trespass, says a High River
> man.
>
> The Mounties made three trips into the home of Greg Kvisle before
> seizing the guns, a 1912 Winchester long-barreled shotgun and a
> 50-year-old .303 rifle in the days following June's deluge.
>
> "My grandfather passed them down to my dad and when he passed away we
> brought them here for safekeeping," said Kvisle, adding neither weapon
> has been fired in decades.
>
> "It's a sentimental thing for me."
>
> He said both guns were stashed in a corner of his basement in a
> storage area beneath boxes and far from any ammunition.
>
> "They weren't visible and were secure as far as I saw it," said Kvisle.
>
> His street wasn't impacted by the flooding and hadn't been evacuated,
> but Kvisle said he was in Calgary when the water hit its height, and
> was barred from returning home for nine days.
>
> Once home, his suspicions that the two weapons might have been seized
> were quickly confirmed.
>
> About half of his neighbours had remained home, including those next
> door who kept an eye on his property and helped Mounties enter his
> home three times, said Kvisle.
>
> "I just don't understand why they were searching for them," he said.
>
> "They're supposed to be protecting our home, not looting it."
>
> Kvisle said he had no trouble getting back his weapons from RCMP
> officers, whom he called courteous and professional.
>
> But the fact Mounties had taken hidden guns from his home on a
> partly-populated street police were patrolling rankles him.
>
> "What's next?" he said.
>
> The Mounties said they seized firearms to prevent them from falling
> into the hands of burglars in vacated, unsecured areas.
>
> Kvisle's guns were situated in open view because it would have taken
> very little to uncover them, said RCMP Sgt. Josee Valiquette.
>
> "It could be in plain view under a bed, in a closet - somewhere
> somebody could hide," said Valiquette.
>
> "If they happened to open a closet, it is in plain sight...these
> firearms were inappropriately secured."
>
> Kvisle said he's been told a civilian group that oversees the RCMP is
> reviewing his case.
>
> "I hope we get some answers," he said.
>
> bill.kaufmann@sunmedia.ca
>
> Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd
>
> By Erin Hatfield
>
> "If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
> world is all screwed up, rearrange it."
>
> The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
> the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
> watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
> unofficial, theme song for the debate.
>
> The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
> they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
> Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
> chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
> left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
> mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
> the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.
>
> The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was
> organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage
> of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record
> and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.
>
> Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
> responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
> exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
> Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
> other on their answers and criticizing eachothers' party leaders.
> Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
> questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic
> relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
> response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's
> getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."
>
> Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his
> party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but
> well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am
> on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better
> places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters
> shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.
>
> The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At
> one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in
> front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the
> voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According to
> Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and second
> readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted, at
> final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to
> register sex offenders rather than register the property of law
> abiding citizens."
>
> The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and
> women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman
> yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron
> spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.
>
> Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy
> Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You're out of touch," Armstrong
> yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of
> post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged
> Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time,
> anyplace," Armstrong responded.
>
> As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate,
> candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and
> fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making
> process for the June 28 vote.
>
> Cutline - David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his
> favourite possessions-motorcycles.
>
> McKnight/KCR
>
> The Unconventional Candidate
>
> David Amos Isn't Campaigning For Your Vote, But..
>
> By Gisele McKnight
>
> FUNDY-He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
> wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
> that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."
>
> Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot-David Amos.
>
> The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife
> and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from
> running for office in Canada.
>
> One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail
> to meet Elections Canada requirements.
>
> When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his
> favourite place to do so-Fundy.
>
> Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his
> dissatisfaction with politicians.
>
> "I've become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he
> said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."
>
> The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in
> 1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he
> needed to change his life.
>
> "I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that
> sometimes in midlife."
>
> So Amos, who'd lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners
> motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952
> Panhead motorcycle.
>
> "Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact)
> experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you
> renew your faith in mankind - you help anyone you can, you never ask
> for anything, but you take what they offer."
>
> For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs
> and conversation all over North America.
>
> Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son
> and a daughter and become a house-husband - Mr. Mom, as he calls
> himself.
>
> He also describes himself in far more colourful terms-a motorcyclist
> rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed
> individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud
> Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."
>
> Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his life.
>
> "But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said.
> "It's alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"
>
> Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.
>
> "I didn't appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door
> interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can
> call me. I'm not going to drive my opinions down their throats."
>
> And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.
>
> "I won't take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It's
> not about money. It goes against what I'm fighting about."
>
> What he's fighting for is the discussion of issues - tainted blood,
> the exploitation of the Maritimes' gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
> name a few.
>
> "The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs - fishing,
> farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I'm
> death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
> (NAFTA) out the window.
>
> NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
> easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.
>
> Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.
>
> "There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
> especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
> Don't necessarily vote for me, but vote."
>
> Although.if you're going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have
> your X by his name.
>
> "I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and
> say, 'what the hell.'"
>
 
 

Business Member Directory

Support the businesses who support your right to own and use firearms!

160 directory listings

FortKnight Optics

Info@fortknightoptics.com

Vancouver, BC, Canada

604-719-6950

Armurerie DC Gunsmith

info@dcgunsmith.ca

Balmoral, NB, Canada

506-686-3214

Phase Line Green Tactical

earl@phaselinegreentactical.ca

Ottawa, ON, Canada

613-558-7236

Select shooting Supplies

sales@selectshootingsupplies.com

Cambridge, ON, Canada

519-219-4867

Mag3D.ca

MagSystems@outlook.com

Strathmore , AB, Canada

East Sooke Grocer and General Store

Sooke, BC, Canada

250-516-5946

Club de Tir Ville St-Pierre

lachine, QC, Canada

514-365-6163

Club de tir Ruisseau Noir

admin@ruisseau-noir.ca

Terrebonne, QC, Canada

514-781-9773

Northern Elite Firearms

northernelitefirearms@gmail.com

Prince Albert, SK, Canada

306-763-4867

Calibre Publishing

info@calibremag.ca

Kelowna, BC, Canada

604-790-3136

Pare's Home Hardware

Brighton, ON, Canada

613-475-2471

Prairie Precision Steel

prairieprecisionsteel@gmail.com

Consul, SK, Canada

306-299-4589

Bishop Lake Outdoors Inc.

bishoplakeoutdoors@gmail.com

Cloyne, ON, Canada

613-336-2311

Lawry Shooting Sports

derek@lawryshootingsports.com

Caledonia, ON, Canada

905-512-0417

Cameron Arms Inc

cameronarms@hotmail.com

Red Deer, AB, Canada

403-505-2539

Hudson Supplies

info@hudson4supplies.com

Saint-Laurent, QC, Canada

514-337-5005

Calgary Shooting Centre

info@theshootingcentre.com

Calgary, AB, Canada

403-451-1777

BC Firearms Academy Inc.

info@bcfirearmsacademy.ca

Surrey, BC, Canada

604-592-2410

Shooter's Choice Ltd

info@shooterschoice.com

Waterloo, ON, Canada

519-746-8139

Noront Armature 2009

norontarmature@gmail.com

North Bay, ON, Canada

705-474-8204

Northern Republic Magazine

sales@northernrepublicmagazine.com

Duntroon, ON, Canada

705-770-7808

Saskatchewan Firearms Safety Training

Justin@justingreif.com

Tisdale, SK, Canada

306-873-1517

101015650 sask ltd

hanz-mco@hotmail.ca

Carrot River, SK, Canada

306-768-7623

Jost Training Services

JostTrainingServices@gmail.com

Wahnapitae, ON, Canada

705-919-0500

FREEDOM VENTURES LTD

sales@freedomventures.ca

Halifax, NS, Canada

902-455-5483

Woodstock Pistol & Rifle Club Inc.

wprc2005@gmail.com

Woodstock, NB, Canada

Maier Hardware

maierpaintball@hotmail.com

Thunder Bay, ON, Canada

807-623-6052

Canadian Tactical Sports

Info@canadiantacticalsports.ca

Kamloops, BC, Canada

250-859-4540

Tier One Armament

tieroneadam@gmail.com

Barrie, ON, Canada

647-291-8157

Wolverine Supplies

sales@wolverinesupplies.com

Virden, MB, Canada

204-748-2454

Invictus Specialities Inc.

info@invictus-specialities.com

Lower Coverdale, NB, Canada

506-380-5025

Reliable Gun

orders@reliablegun.com

Vancouver, BC, Canada

604-874-4710

Rouge River Arms Inc

sales@rougeriverarms.com

Richmond Hill, ON, Canada

416-525-2113

Westside Stores

info@westsidestores.ca

Salmon Arm, BC, Canada

250-832-8141

Silvercore

info@silvercore.ca

Delta, BC, Canada

604-940-7785

Perkins Guns & Ammo

Petawawa, ON, Canada

613-735-6690

CTOMS

information@ctoms.ca

Edmonton, AB, Canada

780-469-6106

Blackblitzairsoft

Info@blackblitzairsoft.com

Waterloo, ON, Canada

226-978-4186

Black Leaf Industries

info@blackleafind.com

Edmonton, AB, Canada

587-525-2553

Greenneck Outfitters

info@greenneckoutfitters.com

Deep River, ON, Canada

613-281-5487

SPECTRA POWER SPORTS LTD.

hseibert@spectrapowersports.com

Williams Lake, BC, Canada

250-392-3201

Go Ballistic Gunsmithing LTD

goballisticgunsmithing@gmail.com

Star City, SK, Canada

306-688-0079

South Nahanni Outfitters Ltd.

info@huntnahanni.com

Whitehorse, YT, Canada

867-399-3194

Tree Tube

Ckhsupplies@gmail.com

pilot butte, SK, Canada

306-537-4534

Dzurka Tactical Performance LTD

performance@johndzurka.ca

Yellowknife, NT, Canada

867-445-8648

Direct Action Combat Performance Inc.

randy@directactions.ca

Orléans, ON, Canada

613-222-2692

Association des sauvaginiers du Saguenay Lac-St-Jean

asslsj@sauvaginiers.org

Chicoutimi, QC, Canada

418-540-3920

P & D Enterprises

info@p-d-ent.com

Edmonton, AB, Canada

780-420-6419

The Gun Dealer

info@thegundealer.ca

Mcadam, NB, Canada

506-784-3514

LTT Tactical

info@LTT-Tactical.ca

Rockland, ON, Canada

613-878-5026

Wascana Pistol Club

wascanapistol@gmail.com

Regina, SK, Canada

306-543-8155

Thompson Mountain Sportsmen Association

Info@tmsa.net

Pitt Meadows, BC, Canada

604-312-2487

Gabriola Rod, Gun and Conservation Club

gunclub@shaw.ca

Gabriola Island, BC, Canada

250-247-2070

Xtreme gun shooting center

sales@xtremegunshootingcenter.com

Winnipeg, MB, Canada

204-504-6006

Kelowna & District Fish & Game Club

info@kdfgc.org

Kelowna, BC, Canada

250-801-8385

Trinity Long Range Shooting Ltd.

trinitylongrange@gmail.com

Lumby, BC, Canada

250-547-9402

Napanee and District Rod & Gun Club

ndrgc.admin@kos.net

Napanee, ON, Canada

613-561-2698

Orono Fish and Hunt Club

generalinquiries@ofhc.ca

Orono, ON, Canada

905-439-0035

Instinct Training

info@instincttraining.ca

Sooke, BC, Canada

250-812-6560

Williams' Arms

sales@williamsarms.net

Port Perry, ON, Canada

905-985-8884

Hj Hall Transport Ltd

daryl@hjhalltransport.com

Chilliwack, BC, Canada

604-374-1735

up top sports @d.a.williamson & sons

Mindemoya, ON, Canada

705-377-5748

BLP Law

bprill@blplaw.ca

Mississauga, ON, Canada

416-662-8061

Vortex Canada

info@vortexcanada.net

Guelph, ON, Canada

West Kootenay Ladies Shooting Group

a_uhrynowich@hotmail.com

Castlegar, BC, Canada

250-921-5834

Ward's and Bud Haynes Auctions

Brad@Brad-Ward.com

Edmonton, AB, Canada

780-940-8378

Firearms Outlet Canada Inc.

sales@firearmsoutletcanada.com

Ajax, ON, Canada

905-626-2002

Italian Sporting Goods

sales@italiansportinggoods.com

Vancouver, BC, Canada

604-254-7513

East Elgin Sportsmen's Association

dlightheart@eesa.ca

Aylmer, ON, Canada

226-927-8831

Target Sports Canada

info@targetsportscanada.com

Gormley, ON, Canada

905-888-8288

The Shooting Edge, Inc.

sales@theshootingedge.com

Calgary, AB, Canada

403-720-4867

Bob's Corner Service Ltd.

bcs@syban.net

Alliance, AB, Canada

780-879-3627

Marstar Canada

sales@marstar.ca

Vankleek Hill, ON, Canada

888-744-0066

March Scopes Canada

doug@marchscopes.ca

Calgary, AB, Canada

403-236-0032

Cross Industries Ltd.

info@crossindustriesinc.com

Abbotsford, BC, Canada

604-746-8007

Benazzi Professional Corporation

pbenazzi@rogers.com

Richmond Hill, ON, Canada

905-856-7826

Cache Tactical Supply Inc.

info@cachetactical.ca

Regina, SK, Canada

306-559-7755

RSHR IT Services Inc. O/A Canada Shooting Supply

support@canadashootingsupply.ca

Pickering, ON, Canada

905-492-1223

Division XP

support@divisionxp.com

Québec, QC, Canada

Dean Birks Personal Real Estate Corp

dean@deanbirks.com

Prince George, BC, Canada

250-612-1709

Bear Hills Wildlife and Gun Range

bearhillswlf@gmail.com

Biggar, SK, Canada

PAL Safety Training Inc.

info@pal-training.ca

Edmonton, AB, Canada

780-800-6691

Maple Airsoft Supply

sales@mapleairsoftsupply.ca

Woodstock, ON, Canada

519-536-5461

Conseil des Trappeurs Fauquier

Kapuskasing, ON, Canada

705-335-1814

Kelvins' taxidermy and Gun Shop

kelvinswinimer@hotmail.com

Chester Basin, NS, Canada

902-273-2237

Manitoba Lodges and Outfitters Association

mloa@mloa.com

Winnipeg, MB, Canada

204-772-1912

Bullseye North

Sales@bullseyenorth.com

London, ON, Canada

877-630-8393

On Point Training

info@onpointtraining.ca

Canyon, BC, Canada

Capital Business Development Inc.

info@capitalbd.ca

Spruce Grove, AB, Canada

780-231-8102

Quad B Adventures

quadbadventures@hotmail.com

Wicklow, NB, Canada

506-273-6060

416 Tactical Supply

info@416tactical.com

Toronto, ON, Canada

416-252-8228

EverPine Contracting Ltd.

sales@everpinecontracting.ca

Strathroy, ON, Canada

Target Species Outfitting

Targetspecies@outlook.com

Winnipeg, MB, Canada

431-998-8398

Val Albert motors

Gilbert Mondoux

Kapuskasing, ON, Canada

705-335-0842

Pourvoirie Lac Dumoulin

La Tuque, QC, Canada

819-676-7578

International Shooting Supplies Ltd

sales@internationalshootingsupplies.com

Chilliwack, BC, Canada

604-588-7513

The Marksmen Club

president@marksmenclub.com

Hampton, ON, Canada

905-263-2581

Bushnell Canada

lcalder@bushnell.com

Vaughan, ON, Canada

416-837-0940

Magnum Industrial Services Ltd.

Abbotsford, BC, Canada

604-850-4763

 
 
 
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment