Thursday, 23 February 2023

Ottawa, N.B. say bilateral health deal will be ready in time for March budget

 

Ottawa, N.B. say bilateral health deal will be ready in time for March budget

Federal minister says private Bathurst clinic doesn’t violate principles of Canada Health Act

Federal Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Dominic LeBlanc and Health Minister Jean-Yves Duclos met with Premier Blaine Higgs Wednesday in Saint John, and all three politicians said afterward they are aligned on the funding.

"I think we're close to coming to an agreement in principle, which would allow New Brunswick to plan how they'd use these incremental federal dollars," LeBlanc said.

Higgs said the money will start flowing in July but the province will be able to account for it in the 2023-24 budget to be tabled March 21.

A table with people sitting on either side of it The discussions Wednesday focused on the federal offer of one-on-one agreements with individual provinces, tailored to their needs but still required to fall under four categories: family health services, wait times, mental health and addiction and modernizing the system. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)

"We'll recognize that in our budget — what this money would fund — and we'll have agreements in place that would say exactly where it's going to go and what it's going to be used for." 

The money in question is separate from the additional cash New Brunswick will receive from an increase to the Canada Health Transfer that Ottawa offered the provinces earlier this month.

Higgs pegged that amount at $200 million. 

The discussions Wednesday focused on the federal offer of one-on-one agreements with individual provinces, tailored to their needs but still required to fall under four categories: family health services, wait times, mental health and addiction and modernizing the system.

The bilateral agreement alone will be worth $900 million to New Brunswick over 10 years.

That includes a base amount of $50 million that each province will get each year regardless of what they're entitled to under a per capita formula. 

Higgs pointed to a recently opened private cataract surgery clinic in Bathurst as an example of health-care innovation that could be expanded thanks to the federal funding.

The clinic is privately owned, but Medicare pays for the procedures done there. 

It has reduced the wait time for cataract surgery by 70 per cent in the area, the premier said. 

"We'll do that in other parts of the province and we'll get rid of that wait list," he said.

Doesn't violate Health Act: federal minister

A bill passed by the legislature in December would allow more surgeries normally done in hospitals to be performed in private clinics, paid for with public funds.

Public-sector unions, the federal NDP and the provincial Greens have objected to private clinics and to the federal government sending more money to provinces allowing them. 

But Duclos suggested Wednesday he does not believe New Brunswick's move violates the Canada Health Act.

The key principle of the act "is that people are looked after not based on their wallet, but based on their health-care needs," he said.

"That's a principle that is thankfully recognized and understood by everyone, and certainly here in New Brunswick," he said.

"If that were not the case, my responsibility as federal health minister would be to ensure that it changed, or that there were consequences if it did not."

'Constructive partner'

The bilateral funding agreement will run for 10 years.

LeBlanc and Duclos said they weren't concerned that New Brunswick is projecting a huge surplus this year, $862 million, that it refuses to spend while seeking more federal funding for next year.

"We haven't found any jurisdiction that believes or says that they can reduce their own level of spending" thanks to the federal dollars, LeBlanc said.

The federal minister praised Higgs as a "very constructive partner" in health-care negotiations, pointing out he was one of the first premiers to embrace data sharing as a way of measuring whether the new funding was having an effect.

Other premiers were initially reluctant to agree to that but Higgs "has publicly and privately been an ally to our government in these conversations," LeBlanc said.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Jacques Poitras

Provincial Affairs reporter

Jacques Poitras has been CBC's provincial affairs reporter in New Brunswick since 2000. He grew up in Moncton and covered Parliament in Ottawa for the New Brunswick Telegraph-Journal. He has reported on every New Brunswick election since 1995 and won awards from the Radio Television Digital News Association, the National Newspaper Awards and Amnesty International. He is also the author of five non-fiction books about New Brunswick politics and history.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
 
 
11 Comments


 
Michael G. McKay 
I would ask premier Higgs not to allow Trudeau to implement this so-called digital ID mandate. New Brunswick is don’t need to have their lives devalued by this situation. Mr. Higgs! Please do not sell New Brunswick is out and so I would autonomy. 
 
 
Peaceful Ambivalence

Reply to Michael G. McKay 
Amen! It’s a simple equation. Either Higgs sells out NB and is the worst premier in history or else he says no to the digital ID, protects NB sovereignty within Canada and is the best premier in history. I pray he makes the choice to be a great New Brunswicker and a great premier.  
 
 
G. Timothy Walton
Reply to Michael G. McKay
How unreasonable, to want a person's entire medical history available anytime they're forced to visit a different hospital.

I just love having to struggle to remember minutiae every time I'm in rough enough shape to visit a stressful, crowded environment. And there's that certain frisson, that je ne sais que of communicating clearly with strangers. Heavenly.


David Amos
Reply to G. Timothy Walton   
I make the best of it by teasing them with my form of Chiac 
 
 
 
 
 
Raymond Leger 
How much money can one Higg get and still sleep at night while New Brunswickers are freezing to death in the streets?  
 
 
David Amos 
Reply to Raymond Leger
Such questions never cross politician's minds. Hence they sleep just fine 
 
 
 
 
 
Rosco holt
Just in time to post another surprise surplus. 
 
 
Peaceful Ambivalence

Reply to Rosco holt
Things are not going too well and our politicians might find that they can’t squeeze water from a stone. Having record surpluses while the population chooses between food, heat, gas, clothing, debt, etc is not good governance. I’m not necessarily being critical of this government and see many positives as well as negatives to some of the things they’ve done, but I wish they’d realize just how much New Brunswickers are struggling with inflation before it’s too late. They’re going to squeeze until the surplus quickly dissipated as business dries up. It’s a fine line between record tax revenues due to inflation and a complete drying up of consumer spending. 
 
 
Peaceful Ambivalence

Reply to Rosco holt
PS I know the word in the saying isn’t water but I didn’t want to use the other word.  
 
 
David Amos

Reply to Peaceful Ambivalence 
For somebody with brand new anonymous ID you certainly have a lot to say EH? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Peaceful Ambivalence

We need less government. Obviously if our politicians spend 90% of their time and efforts arguing over who gets to spend the money they collect from us and what they spend it on, then we have too many administrators. Decentralize Canada so decisions are made more locally and then people can decide whether they like the decisions of the provincial government when elections come. We don’t need the federal government acting like a parent in giving us back some of the money they take from us via taxation- only giving it if we elect provincial politicians who do as they say. How many travel expenses and dinners etc were paid for groups of bureaucrats to come to an agreement on how to spend our money? Nothing Ottawa is giving Fredericton came from a money tree, it’s still just our money. 
 
 
G. Timothy Walton 

Reply to Peaceful Ambivalence
So your solution is the existing system but without new federal transfers.
 
 
Peaceful Ambivalence 

Reply to G. Timothy Walton 
No, but why have the federal government collecting taxes and then “funding” the provincial government. Why wouldn’t the federal government just collect fewer taxes? As for complaints about any specific provincial government, that’s up to the electorate. My main point is that we spend a lot of time in this country negotiating which level of government gets to collect and spend the taxes. 
 
 
David Amos 
Reply to Peaceful Ambivalence  
Why not confer with the CRA Boss?  
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment