Wednesday, 1 March 2023

Why lawyers for N.S. mass shooter's spouse say her case should prompt change within RCMP

Re: Is It Time To Remake The RCMP The Bridge with Peter Mansbridge and Todd Veinotte 

David Amos

<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>		Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 8:45 AM
To: mark.hodgins@rci.rogers.com
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Justice Minister <JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 12:37:53 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Is It Time To Remake The RCMP The Bridge
with Peter Mansbridge and Todd Veinotte
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email to the Minister of Justice. Please be assured
that it has been received by the Department. Your email will be
reviewed and addressed accordingly. Thank you.



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 08:37:48 -0400
Subject: Re: Is It Time To Remake The RCMP The Bridge with Peter
Mansbridge and Todd Veinotte
To: themansbridgepodcast@gmail.com, paulpalango
<paulpalango@protonmail.com>, Timothy Bousquet
<tim@halifaxexaminer.ca>, zane@halifaxexaminer.ca,
Todd.Veinotte@rci.rogers.com, news@halifax.citynews.ca,
"Michael.Gorman" <Michael.Gorman@cbc.ca>, "Michael.Duheme"
<Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, justmin
<justmin@gov.ns.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier
<premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
"pierre.poilievre" <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, premier
<premier@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.nt.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, "Kelly.A.Lamrock"
<Kelly.A.Lamrock@gnb.ca>, "charles.murray" <charles.murray@gnb.ca>,
"Mario.Dion" <Mario.Dion@cie.parl.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino"
<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2023/03/why-lawyers-for-ns-mass-shooters-spouse.html

Wednesday, 1 March 2023
 
Why lawyers for N.S. mass shooter's spouse say her case should prompt change within RCMP

https://podcasts.apple.com/tr/podcast/is-it-time-to-remake-the-rcmp/id1478036186?i=1000600942890
 
 
 

Is It Time To Remake The RCMP The Bridge with Peter Mansbridge

    • Politics

The Commissioner of the RCMP said she would not seek a reappointment to the Mountie's top job, so the question becomes should a new Commissioner begin rebuilding the force?  Author Paul Palango who wrote the highly successful book, 22 Murders, claiming how the Mounties botched the investigation into the brutal killings of 22 people in Nova Scotia in 2020. Paul is our guest today.

 
themansbridgepodcast@gmail.com  
 
 
 

Re: 4947

Timothy Bousquet

<tim@halifaxexaminer.ca>		Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 9:05 AM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Hello, I’m taking a much-needed vacation and will not be responding to email until August 4. If this is urgent Halifax Examiner business, please email zane@halifaxexaminer.ca.

Thanks,

Tim Bousquet
Editor
Halifax Examiner

On Jul 29, 2020, at 9:04 AM, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:

> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 21:48:08 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE The "Strike back: Demand an inquiry
> Event." Methinks it interesting that Martha Paynter is supported by
> the Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation N'esy Pas?
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
> Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
>
> Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
> constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
> further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
> office hours, both over the phone and via email.
>
> Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
> office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
> our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
> are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
> your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
> MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en
>
> Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
> your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
> volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
>
> Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus>
>
> Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
> as possible.
>
> Best,
>
>
> MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
> Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
> Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>
> **
> Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
> Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
>
> Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
> s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
> en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
> services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
> que par courrier ?lectronique.
>
> En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
> classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
> et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
> Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
> veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
> trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
> site:https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr
>
> En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
> votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
> extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
> courrier ?lectronique.
>
> Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
> site : http://www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus
>
> Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.
>
> Cordialement,
>
> Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
> Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
> Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
> < mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>
>
> After backlash, governments agree to hold public inquiry into Nova
> Scotia shooting
> By Alexander Quon & Elizabeth McSheffrey Global News
> Posted July 28, 2020 10:42 am
>
> WATCH: The federal government is now proceeding with a public inquiry
> into the Nova Scotia massacre that left 22 innocent people dead in
> April. Elizabeth McSheffrey looks at why Ottawa is changing paths now,
> and what the inquiry has the power to do.
>
> The decision to hold a review into the mass killing in April that
> resulted in the deaths of 22 people in Nova Scotia took three months
> to arrange. In less than a week the decision has been undone after a
> massive wave of public backlash.
>
> Federal Public Safety Minister Bill Blair announced on Tuesday a
> public inquiry will be held into the mass shooting that began in
> Portapique, N.S. on April 18 and came to an end nearly 100 km away, 13
> hours later.
>
> “The Government of Canada is now proceeding with a full Public
> Inquiry, under the authority of the Inquiries Act,” said Blair in a
> statement.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Allan Carroll <allan.carroll@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 18:14:09 -0400
> Subject: Re: Trust that Murray Segal's appointment to whitewash the
> Rehteah Parsons matter did not surprise me after the meail I sent this
> weekend (AOL)
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I will be AOL commencing  July 27, 2013  and returning on August 13,
> 2013.  Cpl David Baldwin of Amherst Det will be assuming my duties
> during my absence. Should you require immediate assistance, please
> contact the main Amherst office number at 902-667-3859.
>
> For inquiries about the Crisis Negotiation Team, please contact
> Sgt.Royce MacRae at 902-720-5426 (w) or 902-471-8776 (c)
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Fitch, Leanne" <leanne.fitch@fredericton.ca>
> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 14:05:24 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Federal Court file no T-1557-15 Now this
> is interesting As soon as Brad Wall got reelected as Premier he began
> blocking my email Go Figure EH David Drummond???
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Due to a very high volume of incoming email to this account there is
> an unusual backlog of pending responses. Your query may not be repleid
> to in a timely fashion. If you require a formal response please send
> your query in writing to my attention c/o Fredericton Police Force,
> 311 Queen St, Fredericton, NB E3B 1B1 or phone (506) 460-2300.
>
> This e-mail communication (including any or all attachments) is
> intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is
> addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If
> you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any use, review,
> retransmission, distribution, dissemination, copying, printing, or
> other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this e-mail, is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
> contact the sender and delete the original and any copy of this e-mail
> and any printout thereof, immediately. Your co-operation is
> appreciated.
>
> Any correspondence with elected officials, employees, or other agents
> of the City of Fredericton may be subject to disclosure under the
> provisions of the Province of New Brunswick Right to Information and
> Protection of Privacy Act.
>
> Le présent courriel (y compris toute pièce jointe) s'adresse
> uniquement à son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou un
> organisme, et pourrait comporter des renseignements privilégiés ou
> confidentiels. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire du courriel, il est
> interdit d'utiliser, de revoir, de retransmettre, de distribuer, de
> disséminer, de copier ou d'imprimer ce courriel, d'agir en vous y
> fiant ou de vous en servir de toute autre façon. Si vous avez reçu le
> présent courriel par erreur, prière de communiquer avec l'expéditeur
> et d'éliminer l'original du courriel, ainsi que toute copie
> électronique ou imprimée de celui-ci, immédiatement. Nous sommes
> reconnaissants de votre collaboration.
>
> Toute correspondance entre ou avec les employés ou les élus de la
> Ville de Fredericton pourrait être divulguée conformément aux
> dispositions de la Loi sur le droit à l’information et la protection
> de la vie privée.
>
> GOV-OP-073
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale  (PS/SP)" <Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 16:39:00 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks this afternoon Harjit Sajjan and
> his minions should go to Federal Court pull my file (T-1557-15) from
> the docket then read statement 83 real slow N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la
> S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile.
> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
> adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un
> retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre
> message sera examin? avec attention.
> Merci!
> L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle
> S?curit? publique Canada
> *********
>
> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of
> Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
> addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in
> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
> carefully reviewed.
> Thank you!
> Ministerial Correspondence Unit
> Public Safety Canada
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Fitch, Leanne" <leanne.fitch@fredericton.ca>
> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 16:38:59 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks this afternoon Harjit Sajjan and
> his minions should go to Federal Court pull my file (T-1557-15) from
> the docket then read statement 83 real slow N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
>
> Due to a very high volume of incoming email to this account there is
> an unusual backlog of pending responses. Your message may not be
> responded to in a timely fashion. If you require a formal response
> please send your query in writing to my attention c/o Fredericton
> Police Force, 311 Queen St, Fredericton, NB E3B 1B1 or phone (506)
> 460-2300. If this is an emergency related to public safety please call
> 911.
>
> En raison du grand nombre de courriels que reçoit cette messagerie, il
> se peut qu’une réponse tarde un peu à venir. Si vous avez besoin d'une
> réponse officielle, veuillez envoyer votre demande par écrit à mon
> attention aux soins (a/s) de la Force policière de Fredericton 311,
> rue Queen, Fredericton, NB   E3B 1B1, ou composer le 506 460-2300.
> S'il s'agit d'une urgence de sécurité publique, faites le 911.
>
>
> This e-mail communication (including any or all attachments) is
> intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is
> addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If
> you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any use, review,
> retransmission, distribution, dissemination, copying, printing, or
> other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this e-mail, is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
> contact the sender and delete the original and any copy of this e-mail
> and any printout thereof, immediately. Your co-operation is
> appreciated.
>
> Any correspondence with elected officials, employees, or other agents
> of the City of Fredericton may be subject to disclosure under the
> provisions of the Province of New Brunswick Right to Information and
> Protection of Privacy Act.
>
> Le présent courriel (y compris toute pièce jointe) s'adresse
> uniquement à son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou un
> organisme, et pourrait comporter des renseignements privilégiés ou
> confidentiels. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire du courriel, il est
> interdit d'utiliser, de revoir, de retransmettre, de distribuer, de
> disséminer, de copier ou d'imprimer ce courriel, d'agir en vous y
> fiant ou de vous en servir de toute autre façon. Si vous avez reçu le
> présent courriel par erreur, prière de communiquer avec l'expéditeur
> et d'éliminer l'original du courriel, ainsi que toute copie
> électronique ou imprimée de celui-ci, immédiatement. Nous sommes
> reconnaissants de votre collaboration.
>
> Toute correspondance entre ou avec les employés ou les élus de la
> Ville de Fredericton pourrait être divulguée conformément aux
> dispositions de la Loi sur le droit à l’information et la protection
> de la vie privée.
>
> GOV-OP-073
>
>
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>
>
> Friday, 18 September 2015
> David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15
>
>
>
>                      Court File No. T-1557-15
>
> FEDERAL COURT
>
> BETWEEN:
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
>                           Plaintiff
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
>                           Defendant
>
> STATEMENT OF CLAIM
>
> The Parties
>
> 1.      HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN (Crown) is Elizabeth II, the Queen of
> England, the Protector of the Faith of the Church of England, the
> longest reigning monarch of the United Kingdom and one of the
> wealthiest persons in the world. Canada pays homage to the Queen
> because she remained the Head of State and the Chief Executive Officer
> of Canada after the Canada Act 1982 (U.K.) 1982, c. 11 came into force
> on April 17, 1982. The standing of the Queen in Canada was explained
> within the 2002 Annual Report FORM 18-K filed by Canada with the
> United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). It states as
> follows:
>
>     “The executive power of the federal Government is vested in the
> Queen, represented by the Governor General, whose powers are exercised
> on the advice of the federal Cabinet, which is responsible to the
> House of Commons. The legislative branch at the federal level,
> Parliament, consists of the Crown, the Senate and the House of
> Commons.”
>
>     “The executive power in each province is vested in the Lieutenant
> Governor, appointed by the Governor General on the advice of the
> federal Cabinet. The Lieutenant Governor’s powers are exercised on the
> advice of the provincial cabinet, which is responsible to the
> legislative assembly. Each provincial legislature is composed of a
> Lieutenant Governor and a legislative assembly made up of members
> elected for a period of five years.”
>
> 2.      Her Majesty the Queen is the named defendant pursuant to
> sections 23(1) and 36 of the Crown Liability and Proceedings Act. Some
> of the state actors whose duties and actions are at issue in this
> action are the Prime Minister, Premiers, Governor General, Lieutenant
> Governors, members of the Canadian Forces (CF), and Royal Canadian
> Mounted Police (RCMP), federal and provincial Ministers of Public
> Safety, Ministers of Justice, Ministers of Finance, Speakers, Clerks,
> Sergeants-at-Arms and any other person acting as Aide-de-Camp
> providing security within and around the House of Commons, the
> legislative assemblies or acting as security for other federal,
> provincial and municipal properties.
>
> 3.      Her Majesty the Queen’s servants the RCMP whose mandate is to
> serve and protect Canadian citizens and assist in the security of
> parliamentary properties and the protection of public officials should
> not deny a correspondence from a former Deputy Prime Minister who was
> appointed to be Canada’s first Minister of Public Safety in order to
> oversee the RCMP and their cohorts. The letter that helped to raise
> the ire of a fellow Canadian citizen who had never voted in his life
> to run for public office four times thus far is quoted as follows:
>
>  “Mr. David R. Amos
>            Jan 3rd, 2004
> 153Alvin Avenue
>   Milton, MA U.S.A. 02186
>
>                Dear Mr. Amos
>
>      Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to
>                my predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding
> your safety.
>                I apologize for the delay in responding.
>
>      If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
>               suggest that you contact the police of local
> jurisdiction. In addition, any
>               evidence of criminal activity should be brought to
> their attention since the
>               police are in the best position to evaluate the
> information and take action
>               as deemed appropriate.
>
>       I trust that this information is satisfactory.
>
>                                                              Yours sincerely
>
> A. Anne McLellan”
>
> 4.      DAVID RAYMOND AMOS (Plaintiff), a Canadian Citizen and the
> first Chief of the Amos Clan, was born in Sackville, New Brunswick
> (NB) on July 17th, 1952.
>
> 5.      The Plaintiff claims standing in this action as a citizen
> whose human rights and democratic interests are to be protected by due
> performance of the obligations of Canada’s public officials who are
> either elected or appointed and all servants of the Crown whose
> mandate is to secure the public safety, protect public interests and
> to uphold and enforce the rule of law. The Crown affirms his right to
> seek relief for offences to his rights under section 24(1) of the
> Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charter). Paragraphs 6 to 13
> explain the delay in bringing this action before Federal Court and
> paragraphs 25 to 88 explain this matter.
>
> 6.      The Plaintiff states that pursuant to the democratic rights
> found in Section 3 of the Charter he was a candidate in the elections
> of the membership of the 38th and 39th Parliaments in the House of
> Commons and a candidate in the elections of the memberships of the
> legislative assemblies in Nova Scotia (NS) and NB in 2006.
>
> 7.      The Plaintiff states that if he is successful in finding a
> Chartered Accountant to audit his records as per the rules of
> Elections Canada, he will attempt to become a candidate in the
> election of the membership of the 42nd Parliament.
>
> 8.      The Plaintiff states that beginning in January of 2002, he
> made many members of the RCMP and many members of the corporate media
> including employees of a Crown Corporation, the Canadian Broadcasting
> Corporation (CBC) well aware of the reason why he planned to return to
> Canada and become a candidate in the next federal election. In May of
> 2004, all members seated in the 37th Parliament before the writ was
> dropped for the election of the 38th Parliament and several members of
> the legislative assemblies of NB and Newfoundland and Labrador (NL)
> knew the reason is the ongoing rampant public corruption. Evidence of
> the Plaintiff’s concerns can be found within his documents that the
> Office of the Governor General acknowledged were in its possession ten
> years ago before the Speech from the Throne in 2004. The Governor
> General’s letter is as follows:
>
>
>  “September 11th, 2004
>          Dear Mr. Amos,
>
>           On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne
> Clarkson,
>           I acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and CD
> regarding corruption,
>           one received from you directly, and the other forwarded to
> us by the Office of
>           the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick.
>
>                       I regret to inform you that the Governor
> General cannot intervene in
>           matters that are the responsibility of elected officials
> and courts of Justice of
>           Canada. You already contacted the various provincial
> authorities regarding
>           your concerns, and these were the appropriate steps to take.
>
>                                                  Yours sincerely.
>                                                              Renee
> Blanchet
>                                                              Office
> of the Secretary
>                                                              to the
> Governor General”
>
> 9.      The Plaintiff states that the documents contain proof that the
> Crown by way of the RCMP and the Minister of Public Safety/Deputy
> Prime Minister knew that he was the whistleblower offering his
> assistance to Maher Arar and his lawyers in the USA. The Governor
> General acknowledged his concerns about the subject of this complaint
> and affirmed that the proper provincial authorities were contacted but
> ignored the Plaintiff’s faxes and email to the RCMP and the Solicitor
> General in November of 2003 and his tracked US Mail to the Solicitor
> General and the Commissioner of the RCMP by way of the Department of
> Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) in December of 2003
> and the response he received from the Minister of Public Safety/Deputy
> Prime Minister in early 2004. One document was irrefutable proof that
> there was no need whatsoever to create a Commission of Inquiry into
> Maher Arar concerns at about the same point in time. That document is
> a letter from the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Office
> Inspector General (OIG complaint no. C04-01448) admitting contact with
> his office on November 21, 2003 within days of the Plaintiff talking
> to the office of Canada’s Solicitor General while he met with the US
> Attorney General and one day after the former Attorney General of New
> York (NY) and the former General Counsel of the SEC testified at a
> public hearing before the US Senate Banking Committee about
> investigations of the mutual fund industry.
>
> 10.  The Plaintiff states that another document that the Plaintiff
> received during the election of the 39th Parliament further supported
> the fact he was a whistleblower about financial crimes. In December of
> 2006 a member of the RCMP was ethical enough to admit that he
> understood the Plaintiff’s concerns and forwarded his response to the
> acting Commissioner of the RCMP and others including a NB Cabinet
> Minister Michael B. Murphy QC. The Crown is well aware that any member
> sitting in the last days of the 37th Parliament through to the end of
> the 41st Parliament could have stood in the House of Commons and asked
> the Speaker if the Crown was aware of the Plaintiff’s actions. All
> parliamentarians should have wondered why his concerns and that of Mr.
> Arar’s were not heard by a committee within the House of Commons in
> early 2004. Instead, the Crown created an expensive Commission to
> delay the Arar matter while he sued the governments of Canada and the
> USA and his wife ran in the election of the 38th Parliament. In 2007,
> Arar received a $10-million settlement from the Crown and the Prime
> Minister gave him an official apology yet the US government has never
> admitted fault. A month after the writ was dropped for the election of
> the 42nd Parliament and CBC is reporting Syrian concerns constantly,
> Mr. Arar’s lawyer announced that the RCMP will attempt to extradite a
> Syrian intelligence officer because it had laid a charge in absentia
> and a Canada-wide warrant and Interpol notice were issued. The
> Plaintiff considers such news to be politicking practiced by the
> Minister of Public Safety. He noticed the usually outspoken Mr. Arar
> made no comment but his politically active wife had lots to say on
> CBC. Meanwhile, the RCMP continues to bar a fellow citizen from
> parliamentary properties because he exercised the same democratic
> rights after he had offered his support to Arar by way of his American
> lawyers. The aforementioned letter about financial crimes was from the
> Inspector General for Tax Administration in the US Department of the
> Treasury. Mr Arar’s lawyers, the RCMP, the Canadian Revenue Agency and
> the US Internal Revenue Service still refuse to even admit TIGTA
> complaint no. 071-0512-0055-C exists. However, the Commissioner of
> Federal Court, the Queen’s Privy Council Office and other agencies
> were made well aware of it before the Speech from the Throne in 2006.
>
> 11.  The Plaintiff states that from June 24, 2004 until the day he
> signed this complaint he has diligently tried to resolve the breach of
> his rights under the Charter that are the subject of this complaint
> with any public official in Canada whom he believed had the mandate or
> the ability to request that the Crown investigate and correct the
> malicious actions and inactions of the RCMP, Sergeants-at-Arms and
> Aides-de-Camp in all jurisdictions. Until June 16, 2006 the Plaintiff
> did not have irrefutable proof to support this complaint. Time did not
> permit him to address it immediately in Federal Court in 2006 because
> his slate was full. For instance on June 16, 2006 while dealing with
> deeply troubling private family matters, he was running against the
> Attorney General for his seat in the NS provincial election while
> arguing members of the RCMP about strange calls he got from someone in
> Ottawa who claimed the Department of Public Safety as her client,
> dealing with many liberal party members who were about to witness in
> Moncton NB the first debate of all those who wished to become their
> new leader, assisting a farmer in his attempt to get some authority to
> properly investigate the demise of his cattle and discussing with
> members of the Saint John NB City Council the actions of a sergeant in
> the Saint John Police Force who was calling friends of the Plaintiff
> and claiming that he was drug dealing member of a bike gang that they
> should stay away from while he was preparing to intervene in pipeline
> matter that was about to heard by the National Energy Board in Saint
> John .
>
> 12.  The Plaintiff states that in April of 2007 he wrote a complaint
> about this matter and returned to the Capital District of NB in order
> to file it and argue the Crown before the Federal Court if it did not
> wish to settle. A clerk of this court informed him that his complaint
> was not composed correctly, so he began to rewrite this complaint.
> However, as soon as it was known what the Plaintiff was about to file
> he was subject to further police harassment and his family began to
> suffer from constant slander, sexual harassment and death threats on
> the Internet and on the telephone that continues to this very day
> while the RCMP, the FBI and many other law enforcement authorities
> continue to ignored the obvious evidence of cybercrime practiced
> against many people including his minor children.
>
> 13.  The Plaintiff states that the Crown’s only response has been
> further harassment by the RCMP including false arrest and imprisonment
> and theft of his property by the Fredericton Police Force supported by
> other law enforcement authorities in Canada and the USA. The Governor
> General has had the Plaintiff’s documents for over ten years to study.
> The Crown now has one of the complaints that the RCMP has been
> delaying since 2003. It is as follows:
>
> The Complaint
>
> 14.  The Plaintiff states that on June 24, 2004 during the election of
> the membership of the 38th Parliament the Crown breached his right to
> peaceful assembly and association under Section 2(c) and (d) of the
> Charter. The Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative Assembly of NB (a
> former member of the RCMP) supported by the Fredericton Police Force
> (FPF), the Corps of Commissionaires (COC) and at least one RCMP
> officer acting as Aide-de-Camp to the NB Lieutenant Governor barred
> the Plaintiff under threat of arrest from the legislative properties
> in NB.
>
 
 
 
 

Tim Bousquet on Todd Veinotte -Dec 1 the day after Costa's letter to SiRT goes public on MCC website

3.48K subscribers
442 views Dec 1, 2022
WHAT ABOUT THE JULY 10, 2020 SITREP? WHAT ABOUT SIRT? 
 
Supt Costa Dimopoulos letter to SiRT:  
 
Nothing to see here submissions... ok... hmmmm Really now? 
 
Tara Long re SITREP and SiRT and more madness: 
 
Patterson on SITREP and SiRT: 
 
November 30 Only one submission from any of the participants ... 
 
Tara on Robert Lewis and I/C CIC issues: 
 

9 Comments

ENJOY YOUR REVIEW OF SOME OF MY EMAILS  
 
Notice the corrupt cops Leanne Fitch and Costa Dimopoulos on August August 08, 2013???


----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: "mikeduffy" <mikeduffy@sen.parl.gc.ca>; "greg.horton"
<greg.horton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "Biage.Carrese"
<Biage.Carrese@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
; "brazep" <brazep@sen.parl.gc.ca>; "harbm"
<harbm@sen.parl.gc.ca>; "pm" <pm@pm.gc.ca>; "justin.trudeau.a1"
<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>; "justmin" <justmin@gov.ns.ca>; "leader"
<leader@greenparty.ca>; "MulcaT" <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>; <boston@ic.fbi.gov>;
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>; "bob.paulson" <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
"Kevin.leahy" <Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; <Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov>;
<us.marshals@usdoj.gov>; <Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov>; "jcarney"
<jcarney@carneybassil.com>; <bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>
Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; "Dale.McGowan"
<Dale.McGowan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "bernadine.chapman"
<bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "Leanne.Fitch"
<Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 7:21 PM
Subject: While your mindless boss Biage Carrese is away perhaps YOU should
finally respond to me EH Cpl Greg Horton?


http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/08/what-joke-mindless-lawyer-mulcair-is-eh.html

http://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2013/07/08/Corporal-Horton-Mike-Duffy/


----- Original Message -----
From: Biage Carrese <Biage.Carrese@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 18:00:31 -0400
Subject: Re: What a joke the mindless lawyer Mulcair is EH Mikey Duffy
and Cpl Greg Horton? (OUT OF OFFICE/ABSENT )
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I will be away from the office August 8th to and including August
23rd.  Plse contact Insp. Costa Dimopoulos if you require assistance
(613-993-6912).

Je serai absent et à l'extérieur du pays du 8 au 23 aout.  Si vous
avez besoin d'assistance, SVP communiquez avec l'insp. Costa
Dimopoulos. (613-993-6912).

http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/fwd-mikey-duffy-and-lawyers-petey.html

From: "Bastarache, Michel (Heenan Blaikie)" <MBastarache@heenan.ca>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 23:21:32 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : Mikey Duffy and the lawyers Petey
MacKay and Arty Hamilton should remember the file called "Upper
Canadians" quite well EH Mr Harper
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Je serai absent jusqu`au 1er novembre 2013. Vous  pouvez communiquez
avec mon adjointe Louise Belleau au 613-236-1668.

I will be away from the office until November 1st,  2013. If you
require assistance, please contact my assistant Louise Belleau at
613-236-1668

Merci / Thank you
M Bastarache


[cid:image2e6d67.JPG@bdab12e8.419ff6b5]


Michel Bastarache
Avocat-Conseil / Counsel
Litige
HEENAN BLAIKIE  SRL / LLP
T 613 236.3488
F 866 441.2699    mbastarache@heenan.ca
55, rue Metcalfe, bureau 300, Ottawa (Ontario) Canada   K1P 6L5
55 Metcalfe Street, Suite 300, Ottawa, Ontario Canada K1P 6L5

Ce courriel pourrait contenir des renseignements confidentiels ou
privilégiés. Si vous n'êtes pas le véritable destinataire, veuillez
nous en aviser immédiatement. Merci.

This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you
are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately. Thank
you.



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 20:21:11 -0300
Subject: Mikey Duffy and the lawyers Petey MacKay and Arty Hamilton
should remember the file called "Upper Canadians" quite well EH Mr Harper
To: MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, bryn.weese@sunmedia.ca,
"justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, "Kory.Teneycke"
<Kory.Teneycke@sunmedia.ca>, byline <byline@sunmedia.ca>, ahamilton
<ahamilton@casselsbrock.com>, mikeduffy <mikeduffy@sen.parl.gc.ca>,
Mackap <Mackap@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, info@pco-bcp.gc.ca,
info@gg.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, acampbell
<acampbell@ctv.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, wallinp
<wallinp@sen.parl.gc.ca>, mbastarache <mbastarache@heenan.ca>,
"steve.graham" <steve.graham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "greg.horton"
<greg.horton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>

http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/politics/story/1.2254419

http://www.scribd.com/doc/2619608/Upper-Canadians

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
To: <bryn.weese@sunmedia.ca>; <masrour_zoghi@yahoo.ca>;
<tracyjmorey@yahoo.ca>; <a.crossman@eastlink.ca>; <kenlow@shaw.ca>;
<sarrapacific@telus.net>; <team@lillianszpak.ca>; <fillmore0274@rogers.com>;
<mike@citycaucus.com>; <daniel@citycaucus.com>; <contact@kathleenohara.ca>;
<mdobbin@telus.net>
Cc: "pm" <pm@pm.gc.ca>; <info@pco-bcp.gc.ca>; <info@gg.ca>;
"maritime_malaise" <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2011 12:48 AM
Subject: RE: Catch 22 Here are some documents that can embarass the hell out
of Harper etc

Anyone can down load these documents

http://www.scribd.com/doc/2526023/DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right


Trust that I have LOTS more
 
 
 

Re: 3579

Timothy Bousquet

<tim@halifaxexaminer.ca>		Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 7:27 PM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Hello, I’m taking a much-needed vacation and will not be responding to email until August 4. If this is urgent Halifax Examiner business, please email zane@halifaxexaminer.ca.

Thanks,

Tim Bousquet
Editor
Halifax Examiner

On Jul 28, 2020, at 6:48 PM, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:

> BTW I inserted a lot more info in this blog
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/07/independent-panel-slap-in-face-says.html
>
>
> https://www.halifaxexaminer.ca/province-house/protesters-decry-shocking-and-paternalistic-decision-to-hold-review-not-inquiry-into-nova-scotia-mass-shooting/
>
>
> Protesters decry ‘shocking and paternalistic’ decision to hold review,
> not inquiry into Nova Scotia mass shooting
> July 27, 2020 By Yvette d'Entremont
>
> Gathered at Victoria Park in Halifax at noon Monday for a general
> strike intended to draw attention to demands for a public inquiry into
> the Nova Scotia mass killing.
>
> The event was slated to run from noon to 12:22, a 22-minute strike to
> pay homage to the 22 people whose lives were taken during the weekend
> of April 18-19.
>
> “This is something that all sectors of society have asked for,” Martha
> Paynter, founder and coordinator of Women’s Wellness Within, told
> reporters before the event started.
>
> Her organization works for reproductive justice, prison abolition and
> health equity. It was one of several feminist community activist and
> advocacy groups behind Monday’s ‘Strike back: Demand an inquiry’
> event."
>
>
>
> https://marthapaynter.ca/
>
>
> ‘Strike back: Demand an inquiry’ event." is a registered nurse
> providing abortion and postpartum care. She is a Doctoral Candidate in
> Nursing at Dalhousie University. She is the founder and coordinator of
> Women’s Wellness Within, a non-profit organization supporting
> criminalized women and transgender/nonbinary individuals in the
> perinatal period in carceral institutions and the community. She works
> to advance reproductive justice through advocacy, collaboration and
> nursing scholarship.
>
> For her nursing advocacy and research, Martha has received numerous
> awards including  the 2018 Rising Star Award from the Canadian
> Association of Perinatal and Women’s Health Nurses, the 2018 Health
> Advocacy Award from the Council of the College of Registered Nurses of
> Nova Scotia, the 2018 3M National Student Fellowship, and in 2017, the
> Senate of Canada Sesquicentennial Medal for volunteer service to the
> country.
>
> Martha’s doctoral research is supported by the Pierre Elliott Trudeau
> Foundation, CIHR Banting-Best Canadian Doctoral Scholarship, the
> Killam Predoctoral Scholarship, the Canadian Nurses Foundation,
> Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre"
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2019 11:29:02 -0400
> Subject: Attn El Jones I just called and left a message saying Iiked your style
> To: El.Jones@msvu.ca, tim@halifaxexaminer.ca, "steve.murphy"
> <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
> Cc: "David.Raymond.Amos" <David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com>
>
> https://www.halifaxexaminer.ca/featured/prisons-refugees-cats/#3.%20Fight%20me%20over%20cat%20names
>
> Prisons, Refugees, Cats
>
> August 5, 2018 By El Jones
>
> Martha Paynter was driving through New Brunswick this weekend and
> texted me that she saw a billboard for the Airbnb in the old
> Dorchester Jail.
>
> Among the attractions listed on the website are that it was the site
> of the last double hanging in New Brunswick (more on that in a
> moment), with a highlight being that guests can stay in the former
> cells.
>
> tim@halifaxexaminer.ca
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayro4wYzckg&t=64s
>
> El Jones - Judges
> 1,107 views
> el jones
> Published on May 25, 2016
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7y0IkmSVTc
>
> Canada is So Polite - El Jones
> 2,895 views
> Janice Jo Lee
> Published on Jan 25, 2018
>
>
>
> https://www.msvu.ca/en/home/aboutus/news/ElJonesNamedNancysChair.aspx
>
> El Jones appointed Nancy’s Chair in Women’s Studies at the Mount
>
>
> El’s office is located in the McCain Centre (room 208B). She can be
> reached at El.Jones@msvu.ca or 902-457-6257.
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Kevin Leahy <kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 12:38:43 -0400
> Subject: Re: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge (857 259
> 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> French will follow
>
> Thank you for your email.
>
> For inquiries regarding EMRO’s Office, please address your email to
> acting EMRO Sebastien Brillon at sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> For inquiries regarding CO NHQ Office, please address your email to
> acting CO Farquharson, David at David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> All PPS related correspondence should be sent to my PPS account at
> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Merci pour votre courriel.
>
> Pour toute question concernant le Bureau de l'EMRO, veuillez adresser
> vos courriels à l’Officier responsable des Relations
> employeur-employés par intérim Sébastien Brillon  à l'adresse suivante
> sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> Pour toute  question concernant le bureau du Commandant de la
> Direction générale, veuillez adresser vos courriels au   Commandant de
> la Direction générale par intérim Farquharson, David  à l'adresse
> suivante   David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> Toute correspondance relative au Service De Protection Parlementaire
> doit être envoyée à mon compte de PPS à l'adresse suivante
> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
>
>
> Kevin Leahy
> Chief Superintendent/Surintendant principal
> Director, Parliamentary Protective Service
> Directeur , Service de protection parlementaire
> T 613-996-5048
> Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are
> confidential and may contain protected information. It is intended
> only for the individual or entity named in the message. If you are not
> the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver the
> message that this email contains to the intended recipient, you should
> not disseminate, distribute or copy this email, nor disclose or use in
> any manner the information that it contains. Please notify the sender
> immediately if you have received this email by mistake and delete it.
> AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ: Le présent courriel et tout fichier qui y est
> joint sont confidentiels et peuvent contenir des renseignements
> protégés. Il est strictement réservé à l’usage du destinataire prévu.
> Si vous n’êtes pas le destinataire prévu, ou le mandataire chargé de
> lui transmettre le message que ce courriel contient, vous ne devez ni
> le diffuser, le distribuer ou le copier, ni divulguer ou utiliser à
> quelque fin que ce soit les renseignements qu’il contient. Veuillez
> aviser immédiatement l’expéditeur si vous avez reçu ce courriel par
> erreur et supprimez-le.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 16:38:41 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge
> (857 259 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
>
> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>
> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
> response may take several business days.
>
> Thanks again for your email.
> ______­­
>
> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>
> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>
> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>
> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 11:55:57 -0400
> Subject: Re the CBA, the RCMP, Federal Court File # T-1557-15 and the
> Hearing before the Federal Court of Appeal on May 24th 2017
> To: ray.adlington@mcinnescooper.com, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
> "bob.paulson" <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
> <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
> <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>, "bill.pentney"
> <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, Mordaith
> <Mordaith@gmail.com>, "leanne.murray"
> <leanne.murray@mcinnescooper.com>, gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>,
> "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "nick.moore"
> <nick.moore@bellmedia.ca>, "jeremy.keefe"
> <jeremy.keefe@globalnews.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
> "Gilles.Blinn" <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
> <Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, sallybrooks25 <sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>,
> oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch
> <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>,
> premier <premier@gnb.ca>, "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
> "Larry.Tremblay" <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "luc.labonte"
> <luc.labonte@gnb.ca>
>
> As I told the RCMP who called me last month the proper time and place
> to discuss the CBA and your former partner Judge Richard Bell is the
> Federal Court of Canada
>
> Raymond G. Adlington Partner
> McInnes Cooper
> 1300-1969 Upper Water St., Purdy's Wharf Tower II PO Box 730, Stn. Central
> Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 2V1
> Phone: (902) 444-8470
> Fax: (902) 425-6350
> E: ray.adlington@mcinnescooper.com
>
> http://www.mcinnescooper.com/news/ray-adlington-named-to-cba-board-of-directors/
>
> Ray Adlington named to CBA Board of Directors
>
>    May 2, 2017
>
> Halifax partner Ray Adlington was recently named to the CBA Board of Directors.
>
> In their announcement yesterday the CBA advised that the board would
> come into effect September 1st, 2017.
>
>    After collecting extensive input over the past two years, we know
> that CBA members believe it’s important for the organization to have a
> Board of Directors that reflects the diversity of the legal
> profession, including a mix of practice types, experience, skills,
> geography and more.
>    Our new Board of Directors exemplifies this principle.
>
> The board is composed from one member from each province as well as
> the CBA President.
>
> Congratulations Ray on this well deserved appointment.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:15:59 -0400
> Subject: Hey Ralph Goodale perhaps you and the RCMP should call the
> Yankees Governor Charlie Baker, his lawyer Bob Ross, Rachael Rollins
> and this cop Robert Ridge (857 259 9083) ASAP EH Mr Primme Minister
> Trudeau the Younger and Donald Trump Jr?
> To: pm@pm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
> Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, djtjr@trumporg.com,
> Donald.J.Trump@donaldtrump.com, JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca,
> Frank.McKenna@td.com, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Douglas.Johnson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> gov.press@state.ma.us, bob.ross@state.ma.us, jfurey@nbpower.com,
> jfetzer@d.umn.edu, Newsroom@globeandmail.com, sfine@globeandmail.com,
> .Poitras@cbc.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
> Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, news@kingscorecord.com,
> news@dailygleaner.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, jbosnitch@gmail.com,
> andre@jafaust.com>
> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, DJT@trumporg.com
> wharrison@nbpower.com, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca,  mcu@justice.gc.ca,
> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Murray, Charles (Ombud)" <Charles.Murray@gnb.ca>
> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 18:16:15 +0000
> Subject: You wished to speak with me
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I have the advantage, sir, of having read many of your emails over the
> years.
>
>
> As such, I do not think a phone conversation between us, and
> specifically one which you might mistakenly assume was in response to
> your threat of legal action against me, is likely to prove a
> productive use of either of our time.
>
>
> If there is some specific matter about which you wish to communicate
> with me, feel free to email me with the full details and it will be
> given due consideration.
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
> Charles Murray
>
> Ombud NB
>
> Acting Integrity Commissioner
>
>
> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Mr. Amos,
> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
> of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>
> Department of Justice
>
> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
> ilian.html
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>
> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>
> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
> cards?
>
> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
> 6
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>
> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>
> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>
> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
> Senator Arlen Specter
> United States Senate
> Committee on the Judiciary
> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
> Washington, DC 20510
>
> Dear Mr. Specter:
>
> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
> raised in the attached letter.
>
> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
> tapes.
>
> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>
> Very truly yours,
> Barry A. Bachrach
> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To: coi@gnb.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>
> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>
> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>
>
> The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
> most
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
> dudes are way past too late
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Thank you,
>
> Merci ,
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>
>
> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>
> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>
> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> campaign of 2006.
>
> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>
> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>
> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>
> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>
> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
>
> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html
>
>
> Sunday, 19 November 2017
> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
> The Supreme Court
>
> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do
>
>
> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>
> Amos v. Canada
> Court (s) Database
>
> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
> Date
>
> 2017-10-30
> Neutral citation
>
> 2017 FCA 213
> File numbers
>
> A-48-16
> Date: 20171030
>
> Docket: A-48-16
> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
> CORAM:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
>
> BETWEEN:
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
> Respondent on the cross-appeal
> (and formally Appellant)
> and
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
> Appellant on the cross-appeal
> (and formerly Respondent)
> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>
> THE COURT
>
>
>
> Date: 20171030
>
> Docket: A-48-16
> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
> CORAM:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
>
> BETWEEN:
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
> Respondent on the cross-appeal
> (and formally Appellant)
> and
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
> Appellant on the cross-appeal
> (and formerly Respondent)
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>
> I.                    Introduction
>
> [1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
> (Claim at para. 96).
>
> [2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
> Prothontary’s Order).
>
>
> [3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>
>
> [4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
> cross-appeal.
>
>
> II.                 Preliminary Matter
>
> [5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
> several judges but did not name those judges.
>
> [6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
> c. F-7:
>
>
> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
> Appeal.
> […]
>
> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
> […]
> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>
> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>
>
> [7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
> section.
> [8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
> that:
> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>
> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
> matière civile et pénale.
> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>
> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>
>
> [9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
> appeal book.
>
>
> [10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
> conflict in any matter related to him.
>
>
> [11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>
>
> [12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
> such judge had a conflict.
>
>
> [13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
> was a member of such firm.
>
>
> [14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>
>
> [15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
> [16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
> apprehension of bias:
> 60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
> reasonable apprehension of bias:
> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>
> [17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
> (4th) 193).
>
> [18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
> 27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>
>
> 28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>
>
> 29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>
>
> 30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>            To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
> 31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>
>
> 32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
> events from over a decade ago.
> (emphasis added)
>
> [19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
> Webb hearing this appeal.
>
> [20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>
> [21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>
> [22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>
> [23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
> to recuse himself.
>
> [24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>
> [25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>
>
> III.               Issue
>
> [26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>
> IV.              Analysis
>
> A.                 Standard of Review
>
> [27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>
> [28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
> interfere.
>
>
> B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
> Prothonotary’s Order?
>
> [29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>
> 17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
> (…)
>
>
> 21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
> [footnotes omitted].
>
>
> [30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
> para. 27).
>
>
> [31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>
>
> [13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>
> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>
> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>
> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>
> [32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>
> [33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>
> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
> of process…
>
> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>
> [34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>
> [35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
> supporting a cause of action.
>
> [36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>
> V.                 Conclusion
> [37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
> without leave to amend.
> "Wyman W. Webb"
> J.A.
> "David G. Near"
> J.A.
> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
> J.A.
>
>
>
> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>
> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
> DOCKET:
>
> A-48-16
>
>
>
> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
>
>
> PLACE OF HEARING:
>
> Fredericton,
> New Brunswick
>
> DATE OF HEARING:
>
> May 24, 2017
>
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
> DATED:
>
> October 30, 2017
>
> APPEARANCES:
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
> (on his own behalf)
>
> Jan Jensen
>
>
> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>
> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
> Nathalie G. Drouin
> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>
> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 19:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
> From: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> Subject: Now everybody and his dog knows TJ Burke and his cop buddies
> allegations against me are false and you had the proof all along EH
> Chucky?
> To: oldmaison@yahoo.com, nbombud@gnb.ca, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca,
> jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, news@dailygleaner.com,
> kcarmichael@bloomberg.net, advocacycollective@yahoo.com,
> Easter.W@parl.gc.ca, Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca, cityadmin@fredericton.ca,
> info@gg.ca, bmosher@mosherchedore.ca, rchedore@mosherchedore.ca,
> police@fredericton.ca, chebert@thestar.ca, Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca,
> Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, alltrue@nl.rogers.com,
> Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca,
> Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca
> CC: dgleg@nb.aibn.com, brad.woodside@fredericton.ca,
> whalen@fredericton.ca, david.kelly@fredericton.ca,
> cathy.maclaggan@fredericton.ca, stephen.kelly@fredericton.ca,
> tom.jellinek@fredericton.ca, scott.mcconaghy@fredericton.ca,
> marilyn.kerton@fredericton.ca, walter.brown@fredericton.ca,
> norah.davidson@fredericton.ca, mike.obrien@fredericton.ca,
> bruce.grandy@fredericton.ca, dan.keenan@fredericton.ca,
> jeff.mockler@gnb.ca, mrichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca,
> cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca, jlmockler@mpor.ca,
> scotta@parl.gc.ca, michael.bray@gnb.ca, jack.e.mackay@gnb.ca
> http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new-brunswick/story/2007/05/24/nb-burkethreat.html
>
> http://www.canadaeast.com/ce2/docroot/article.php?articleID=149018
>
> http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/2007/05/tj-burke-walking-around-with-rcmp.html
>
> http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/2006/06/fapo-has-meeting-about-panhanding.html
>
> http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/2007/05/hats-off-to-cbc-reporter-jacques.html
>
> http://maritimes.indymedia.org/mail.php?id=9856
>
> Methinks your liberal pals just made a major faux pas N'est Pas?
> Scroll down Frenchie and go down?.
>
>
> Threat against Burke taken seriously
>
> By STEPHEN LLEWELLYN
> dgleg@nb.aibn.com
> Published Thursday May 24th, 2007
> Appeared on page A1
> An RCMP security detail has been guarding Justice Minister and
> Attorney General T.J. Burke because of threats made against him
> recently.
>
> Burke, the Liberal MLA for Fredericton-Fort Nashwaaksis, wouldn't
> explain the nature of the threats.
>
> "I have had a particular individual or individuals who have made
> specific overtures about causing harm towards me," he told reporters
> Wednesday.
>
> "The RCMP has provided security to me recently by accompanying me to a
> couple of public functions where the individual is known to reside or
> have family members in the area," said Burke. "It is nice to have some
> added protection and that added comfort."
>
> The RCMP provides protection to the premier and MLAs with its VIP security unit.
>
> Burke didn't say when the threat was made but it's believed to have
> been in recent weeks.
>
> "When a threat is posed to you and it is a credible threat, you have
> to be cautious about where you go and who you are around," he said.
> "But again, I am more concerned about my family as opposed to my own
> personal safety."
>
> Burke said he doesn't feel any differently and he has not changed his
> pattern of activity.
>
> "It doesn't bother me one bit," he said. "It makes my wife feel awful nervous."
>
> Burke served in an elite American military unit before becoming a
> lawyer and going into politics in New Brunswick.
>
> "(I) have taken my own precautions and what I have to do to ensure my
> family's safety," he said. "I am a very cautious person in general due
> to my background and training.
>
> "I am comfortable with defending myself or my family if it ever had to happen."
>
> Burke said it is not uncommon for politicians to have security concerns.
>
> "We do live unfortunately in an age and in a society now where threats
> have to be taken pretty seriously," he said.
>
> Since the terrorism attacks in the United States on Sept. 11, 2001,
> security in New Brunswick has been
> beefed up.
>
> Metal detectors were recently installed in the legislature and all
> visitors are screened.
>
> The position of attorney general is often referred to as the
> province's "top cop."
>
> Burke said sometimes people do not differentiate between his role as
> the manager of the justice system and the individual who actually
> prosecutes them.
>
> "With the job sometimes comes threats," he said. "I have had numerous
> threats since Day 1 in office."
>
> Burke said he hopes his First Nations heritage has nothing to do with it.
>
> "I think it is more of an issue where people get fixated on a matter
> and they believe you are personally responsible for assigning them
> their punishment or their sanction," he said.
>
> Is the threat from someone who was recently incarcerated?
>
> "I probably shouldn't answer that," he replied.
>
> Reporters asked when the threat would be over.
>
> "I don't think a threat ever passes once it has been made," said
> Burke. "You have to consider the credibility of the source."
>
> Bruce Fitch, former justice minister in the Conservative government,
> said "every now and again there would be e-mails that were not
> complimentary."
>
> "I did have a meeting with the RCMP who are in charge of the security
> of the MLAs and ministers," said Fitch.
>
> "They look at each and every situation."
>
> Fitch said he never had bodyguards assigned to him although former
> premier Bernard Lord and former health minister Elvy Robichaud did
> have extra security staff assigned on occasion.
>
> He said if any MLA felt threatened, he or she would discuss it with the RCMP.
>
>
> http://www.archive.org/details/SecTreasuryDeptEtc
>
> Small World EH Chucky Leblanc?
>
> "Lafleur, Lou" lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca wrote:
>
> From: "Lafleur, Lou" lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca
> To: "'motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com'" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com,
> "Lafleur, Lou" lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca
> Subject: Fredericton Police Force
> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:21:13 -0300
>
> Dear Mr. Amos
>
> My Name is Lou LaFleur and I am a Detective with the Fredericton
> Police Major Crime Unit. I would like to talk to you regarding files
> that I am investigating and that you are alleged to have involvement
> in.
>
> Please call me at your earliest convenience and leave a message and a
> phone number on my secure and confidential line if I am not in my
> office.
>
> yours truly,
> Cpl. Lou LaFleur
> Fredericton Police Force
> 311 Queen St.
> Fredericton, NB
> 506-460-2332
> ________________________________
> This electronic mail, including any attachments, is confidential and
> is for the sole use of the intended recipient and may be privileged.
> Any unauthorized distribution, copying, disclosure or review is
> prohibited. Neither communication over the Internet nor disclosure to
> anyone other than the intended recipient constitutes waiver of
> privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately
> notify the sender and then delete this communication and any
> attachments from your computer system and records without saving or
> forwarding it. Thank you.
 
 
 

Tuesday, 19 July 2022

Former Mountie testifies neighbour never reported N.S. mass shooter's domestic violence

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ahEAKdyW4Q&ab_channel=AdamRodgers 
 
 

MCC Day 49 – Another Panel Discussion on Mass Casualties, IPV, GBV and Family Violence

327 views
Jul 18, 2022
663 subscribers
After the drama of last week, which concluded with the (unsatisfactory) appearance of Lisa Banfield, the MCC has turned back to the monotony of further discussion panels for the week ahead, with an interlude tomorrow to hear from a police witness and examine Gabriel Wortman’s “financial misdealings”. The focus of today’s “roundtable” was “Mass Casualties, IPV, GBV and Family Violence: Exploring the Connections”. 
 
Most of what was discussed today has been covered in previous discussions on domestic, gender-based, and family violence. Generally, the panelists support treating this violence as a something akin to a public health response, as opposed to private matters. This leads to recommendations to have more resources dedicated to housing, counseling, and financial supports, as well as a shift in public attitudes towards victims of violence. 
 
As has been the case with other panel discussions and expert witnesses, a viewer who may have somehow stumbled upon this discussion would have had difficulty figuring out that it was being held in the context of an inquiry into a specific mass shooting. Certainly, there was no reference to Gabriel Wortman, Lisa Banfied, or any other individuals involved in the events of the April 18-19, 2020 mass casualty events. 
 
It raises questions as to the role of the Commissioners, and the use of the limited time allotted to the MCC. In a civil trial, where an issue arises that might be beyond the expected knowledge or intuitive abilities of the presiding judge, an expert (or, often, two competing experts) may be brought in to shed some light on the matter, after which the presiding judge uses their analytical skills to make a determination about the specific situation before them. 
 
Here, there have been over a dozen experts who have been speaking about the issues around domestic and intimate partner violence, who have seemingly been trying to cover the entire possible spectrum of issues on those topics, regardless of whether there is a connection to the events of the mass casualty being studied. 
 
The presumption behind the heavy volume of expertise on these issues of domestic violence seems to be that it is so unintuitive that these three Commissioners could not possibly come to their own conclusions, and require this high level of guidance in order to understand what is happening, and what needs to happen. That strikes me as a very low level of expectations to have for the three, supposedly highly qualified, Commissioners. 
 
The other possibility is that the time spent is seen to be somehow valuable in educating the public on issues of domestic and intimate partner violence, and that this will help address the identified issues around public attitudes around such violence. If that is the goal, the low level of public engagement on days were these panels have been featured would suggest it was an ill-conceived objective. 
 
There is limited time for the MCC to do it’s work and prepare a report with persuasive recommendations. Each day that is used for a discussion panel to aid the Commissioners or educate the public is a day that is not used to examine witnesses or deal with issues such as cross-border smuggling or criminal intelligence capabilities. These are all choices that the MCC is making. 
 
Tomorrow will be more relevant. There will be a witness, Cst. Troy Maxwell, who was identified as the officer to whom Brenda Forbes spoke regarding Lisa Banfield and Wortman’s ownership of illegal firearms. There will also be a presentation on Wortman’s financial misdealings. It will be interesting to see if there is a discussion of his connections to illegal activities, or whether it will be limited to cash dealings with denturist clients.
 
Say Hey to your buddies Palango, Douglas and Bonaparte for me will ya?
 
 

 
 
 
 

the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting - Feb 26, 2023

8.77K subscribers
636 views
Links: the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting Series: https://www.nighttimepodcast.com/nova... …
Say Hey to Petey Baby Mansbridge and his cohorts for me will ya?
 
 
 
 
 
 

the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting - Feb 19, 2023

8.77K subscribers
695 views 
Links: the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting Series: https://www.nighttimepodcast.com/nova... …
The Fat Lady ain't sung yet
 
 
 
 
 

the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting - Feb 13, 2023

8.77K subscribers
712 views 
Links: the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting Series: https://www.nighttimepodcast.com/nova... …
Methinks you dudes have had years to study my emails N'esy Pas?
 
  Adam Rodgers · 141 Green Street Guysborough, NS B0H 1N0 CA · 902-631-4219 ;

After reading the news this weekend about Nova Scotia LIEbranos I did the lawyers Tilly Pillay and Adam Rodgers a favour told their assistants I would be publishing these emails etc

 

David Amos

<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>		Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 1:11 PM
To: abroughm@nsbs.org, nbd_cna@liberal.ca, "Gerald.Butts" <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "gerry.lowe" <gerry.lowe@gnb.ca>, "ed.pilkington" <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>, editor <editor@wikileaks.org>, editor <editor@frankmagazine.ca>, editor <editor@grapevine.is>, Saint Croix Courier <editor@stcroixcourier.ca>, emerchant@merchantlaw.com, "len.hoyt" <len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>, robert.m.schuett@schuettlaw.com, carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca, Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca, eclark@coxandpalmer.com, Braeden.Caley@vancouver.ca, jda@nf.aibn.com, bdysart@stewartmckelvey.com, bdysart@smss.com, pmilliken@cswan.com, postur <postur@for.is>, "Bill.Oliver" <Bill.Oliver@gnb.ca>, birgittajoy <birgittajoy@gmail.com>, birgitta <birgitta@this.is>, "dan. bussieres" <dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "David.Raymond.Amos" <David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com>, office@liberal.ns.ca


---------- Original message ----------
From: Tilly Pillay <tpillay@nsbs.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 16:57:54 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: After reading the news this weekend about
Nova Scotia LIEbranos I did the lawyers Tilly Pillay and Adam Rodgers
a favour told their assistants I would be publishing these emails etc
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

I am out of the office on vacation until November 8. If your matter is
urgent, please contact my assistant, Anne Broughm, at
abroughm@nsbs.org or 902 422 1491. Thank you.

Tilly



---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 16:57:51 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: After reading the news this weekend about
Nova Scotia LIEbranos I did the lawyers Tilly Pillay and Adam Rodgers
a favour told their assistants I would be publishing these emails etc
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.

There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.

Thanks again for your email.
______­­

Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

Merci encore pour votre courriel.


---------- Original message ----------
From: Kennedy.Stewart@parl.gc.ca
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 16:57:55 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: After reading the news this weekend about
Nova Scotia LIEbranos I did the lawyers Tilly Pillay and Adam Rodgers
a favour told their assistants I would be publishing these emails etc
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Many thanks for your message. Your concerns are important to me. If
your matter is urgent, an invitation or an immigration matter please
forward it to burnabysouth.A1@parl.gc.ca or
burnabysouth.C1@parl.gc.ca. This email is no longer being monitored.

The House of Commons of Canada provides for the continuation of
services to the constituents of a Member of Parliament whose seat has
become vacant.  The party Whip supervises the staff retained under
these circumstances.

Following the resignation of the Member for the constituency of
Burnaby South, Mr. Kennedy Stewart, the constituency office will
continue to provide services to constituents.

You can reach the Burnaby South constituency office by telephone at
(604) 291-8863 or by mail at the following address: 4940 Kingsway,
Burnaby BC.

Office Hours:

Tuesday - Thursday: 10am - 12pm & 1pm - 4pm
Friday 10am - 12pm



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 12:57:43 -0400
Subject: After reading the news this weekend about Nova Scotia
LIEbranos I did the lawyers Tilly Pillay and Adam Rodgers a favour
told their assistants I would be publishing these emails etc
To: "Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "kris.austin"
<kris.austin@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "Mitton, Megan
(LEG)" <megan.mitton@gnb.ca>, "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"
<Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin" <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>,
"Furey, John" <jfurey@nbpower.com>, wharrison <wharrison@nbpower.com>,
premier <premier@gnb.ca>, "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>,
"Alex.Johnston" <Alex.Johnston@cbc.ca>, "darrow.macintyre"
<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca,
"Pierre.Paul-Hus.a1" <Pierre.Paul-Hus.a1@parl.gc.ca>,
"pierre.poilievre.a1" <pierre.poilievre.a1@parl.gc.ca>,
pierre.paul-hus@parl.gc.ca,
ps.publicsafetymcu-securitepubliqueucm.sp@canada.ca, "ralph.goodale"
<ralph.goodale@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"Jody.Wilson-Raybould" <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>,
"clare.barry" <clare.barry@justice.gc.ca>, "david.hansen"
<david.hansen@justice.gc.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
"Dale.Morgan" <Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "david.eidt"
<david.eidt@gnb.ca>, "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>,
"brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, lorri.warner@justice.gc.ca, "jan.jensen"
<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "Nathalie.Drouin"
<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>, "bill.pentney"
<bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "andrew.baumberg"
<andrew.baumberg@fct-cf.gc.ca>, "Norman.Sabourin"
<Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca>, "Gib.vanErt" <Gib.vanErt@scc-csc.ca>,
"marc.giroux" <marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Liliana.Longo"
<Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
english@rcinet.ca, "kennedy.stewart" <kennedy.stewart@parl.gc.ca>,
pvanloan@airdberlis.com, nicola.diiorio@bcf.ca, "Nicola.DiIorio"
<Nicola.DiIorio@parl.gc.ca>, "Catherine.Tait" <Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca>,
"sylvie.gadoury" <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>, "Sophia.Harris"
<Sophia.Harris@cbc.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier
<premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of the
Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, "David.Raymond.Amos"
<David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com>, "Jack.Keir" <Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "greg.byrne" <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>,
"len.hoyt" <len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>, "david.young"
<david.young@mcinnescooper.com>, "macpherson.don"
<macpherson.don@dailygleaner.com>, "David.Akin"
<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
news919 <news919@rogers.com>, sfine <sfine@globeandmail.com>, news
<news@hilltimes.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, newstips
<newstips@cnn.com>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, tpillay@nsbs.org,
Adam@boudrotrodgers.com, "lyle.howe" <lyle.howe@eastlink.ca>,
jason@boudrotrodgers.com

Monday, 5 November 2018

After reading the news this weekend about Nova Scotia LIEbranos I did
the lawyers Tilly Pillay and Adam Rodgers a favour told their
assistants I would be publishing these emails etc

Tilly Pillay is not in her office this week and things went as far as
they always do whenever I call or email her very questionable Law
Society Here hoping Adam Rodgers finally acts with some semblance of
Integrity. However after all this time I am not betting on it.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 18:22:05 -0400
Subject: Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15 Did you order Harper and
the NDP to ignore me as well???
To: Liberal / Assistance <nbd_cna@liberal.ca>, cmunroe@glgmlaw.com, pm
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, mcu
<mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

How about Dizzy Lizzy May and the Bloc?

On 1/6/16, Cmunroe (Liberal / Assistance) <nbd_cna@liberal.ca> wrote:
> RealChange.ca | DuVraiChangement.ca
>
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Cmunroe, Jan 6, 14:28
>
> Hello all,
>
> I would ask that you please do not respond to this e-mail (in the event that
> you were inclined to do so.)
>
> Let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
>
> Regards,
>
> Craig Munroe
> (Party Legal and Constitutional Advisor)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 11:09 AM
> To: Craig Munroe <cmunroe@glgmlaw.com>; nbd_cna@liberal.ca; pm
> <pm@pm.gc.ca>; ljulien@liberal.ca; pmilliken <pmilliken@cswan.com>; bdysart
> <bdysart@smss.com>; bdysart <bdysart@stewartmckelvey.com>;
> Braeden.Caley@vancouver.ca; robert.m.schuett@schuettlaw.com;
> jda@nf.aibn.com; eclark@coxandpalmer.com; office@liberal.ns.ca;
> president@lpco.ca; david@lpcm.ca; emerchant@merchantlaw.com
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; assistance@liberal.ca; Karine
> Fortin <info@ndp.ca>; stephen.harper <stephen.harper.a1@parl.gc.ca>
> Subject: Re: Attn Dr. John Gillis Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15 Trust
> that I called and tried to reason with a lot of Liberals begore I am before
> the court again on Monday Jan 11th
>
> On 1/6/16, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> BTW the nice guys who talked to me and didn't dismiss me I put in the
>> BCC line
>>
>> Dr. John Gillis
>> P.O. Box 723
>> 5151 George Street, Suite 1400
>> Halifax, Nova Scotia
>> Canada B3J 2T3
>> Tel: (902) 429-1993
>> Email: office@liberal.ns.ca
>>
>> John Allan, President
>> Liberal Party of Newfoundland & Labrador
>> T: (709) 685-1230
>> jda@nf.aibn.com
>>
>>
>> Braeden Caley
>> Office of the Mayor, City of Vancouver
>>  604-809-9951
>> Braeden.Caley@vancouver.ca,
>>
>>
>> Britt Dysart QC
>> Suite 600, Frederick Square
>> 77 Westmorland Street
>> P.O. Box 730
>> Fredericton, NB, Canada
>> E3B 5B4
>>
>> P 506.443.0153
>> F 506.443.9948
>>
>>
>> Evatt F. A. Merchant
>> Merchant Law Group LLP
>> First Nations Bank Bldg.
>> 501-224 4th Ave. S.
>> Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7K 5M5
>> Phone: 306-653-7777
>> Email: emerchant@merchantlaw.com
>>
>>
>> Ewan W. Clark
>> Montague
>> Phone: (902) 838-5275
>> Fax: (902) 838-3440
>> eclark@coxandpalmer.com
>>
>> Robert M. Schuett
>> #200, 602 11th Avenue SW
>> Calgary Alberta T2R 1J8
>> Phone: (403) 705-1261
>> Fax: (403) 705-1265
>> robert.m.schuett@schuettlaw.com
>>
>>
>> http://www.liberal.ca/national-board-of-directors/
>>
>> Who are we?
>>
>> We are volunteers from across the country who care passionately about
>> Canada’s future and promoting Liberal values. We are community
>> leaders, parents, and professionals who volunteer our time in this
>> role. The board works together to provide oversight and guidance to
>> the Party in matters both fiduciary, and strategic. We meet regularly
>> in person and by phone with the objective of ensuring the Party is
>> prepared for the next federal election. It is an honour to work with
>> such a distinct and talented group of individuals. Please don’t
>> hesitate to reach out to us at nbd_cna@liberal.ca.
>> Anna Gainey
>>
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada
>>
>> T @annamgainey
>> Leader        Justin Trudeau
>> National President    Anna Gainey
>> Acting National Director      Christina Topp
>> National Vice-President (English)     Chris MacInnes
>> National Vice-President (French)      Marie Tremblay
>> National Policy Chair         Maryanne Kampouris
>> National Membership Secretary         Leanne Bourassa
>> Past National President       Mike Crawley
>> President, Liberal Party of Newfoundland & Labrador   John Allan
>> President, Liberal Party of Prince Edward Island      Ewan Clark
>> President, Nova Scotia Liberal Party  John Gillis
>> President, New Brunswick Liberal Association  Britt Dysart
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Québec)   Linda Julien
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Ontario)  Tyler Banham
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Manitoba)         Sachit Mehra
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Saskatchewan)     Evatt Merchant
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Alberta)  Robbie Schuett
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (British Columbia)         Braeden
>> Caley
>> President, Federal Liberal Association of Yukon       Blake Rogers
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Northwest Territories)    Rosanna
>> Nicol
>> President, Federal Liberal Association of Nunavut     Michel Potvin
>> Caucus Representative         Francis Scarpaleggia
>> Co-Chair, Aboriginal Peoples’ Commission (Female)     Caitlin Tolley
>> Co-Chair, Aboriginal Peoples’ Commission (Male)       Kevin Seesequasis
>> President, National Women’s Liberal Commission        Carlene Variyan
>> President, Young Liberals of Canada   Justin Kaiser
>> Co-Chair, Senior Liberals’ Commission (French)        Anne Adams
>> Co-Chair, Senior Liberals’ Commission (English)       Kenneth D. Halliday
>> Chair, Council of Presidents  Veena Bhullar
>> Chief Financial Officer       Chuck Rifici
>> Chief Revenue Officer         Stephen Bronfman
>> CEO, Federal Liberal Agency of Canada         Mike Eizenga
>> National Campaign Co-Chair    Katie Telford
>> Constitutional and Legal Adviser (English)    Craig Munroe
>> Constitutional and Legal Adviser (French)     Elise Bartlett
>>
>> Craig T. Munroe, Partner
>> Email: cmunroe@glgmlaw.com
>> Phone: (604) 891-1176
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 19:32:00 -0400
>> Subject: Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15 the CBC, the RCMP, their
>> new boss Justin Trudeau and his Ministers of Justice and Defence etc
>> cannot deny their knowledge of Paragraphs 81, 82, 83, 84, and 85 now
>> CORRECT G$?
>> To: Paul.Samyn@freepress.mb.ca, "carolyn.bennett"
>> <carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca>, Doug@dougeyolfson.ca,
>> doug.eyolfson@parl.gc.ca, fpcity@freepress.mb.ca,
>> w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca, "Paul.Lynch" <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>,
>> "Marianne.Ryan" <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, sunrayzulu
>> <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca,
>> "john.green" <john.green@gnb.ca>, chiefape <chiefape@gmail.com>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, gopublic
>> <gopublic@cbc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, radical
>> <radical@radicalpress.com>, newsonline <newsonline@bbc.co.uk>,
>> newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, nmoore <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>,
>> andre <andre@jafaust.com>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.
>> html
>>
>> David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15
>>
>> 81.  The Plaintiff states that matters of harassment that the police
>> refuse to investigate would have entered the realm of ridiculous in
>> 2012 if the reasons behind the suicides of teenagers did not become
>> well known by the corporate media. In the summer of 2012 a new member
>> of the FPS who as a former member of the EPS had inspired a lawsuit
>> for beating a client in Edmonton called the Plaintiff and accused him
>> of something he could not do even if he wanted to while he was arguing
>> many lawyers byway of emails about a matter concerning cyber stalking
>> that was before the SCC.  The member of the FPF accused the Plaintiff
>> of calling the boss of Bullying Canada thirty times. At that time his
>> MagicJack account had been hacked and although he could receive
>> incoming calls, the Plaintiff could not call out to anyone. The
>> Plaintiff freely sent the FPF his telephone logs sourced from
>> MagicJack after his account restored without the Crown having to issue
>> a warrant to see his telephone records. He asked the FPF and the RCMP
>> where did the records of his phone calls to and from the FPF and the
>> RCMP go if his account had not been hacked. The police never
>> responded. Years later a Troll sent Dean Roger Ray a message through
>> YouTube providing info about the Plaintiff’s MagicJack account with
>> the correct password. Dean Roger Ray promptly posted two videos in
>> YouTube clearly displaying the blatant violation of privacy likely to
>> protect himself from the crime. The Plaintiff quickly pointed out the
>> videos to the RCMP and they refused to investigate as usual. At about
>> the same point in time the Plaintiff noticed that the CBC had
>> published a record of a access to information requests. On the list of
>> requests he saw his name along with several employees of CBC and the
>> boss of Bullying Canada. The Plaintiff called the CBC to make
>> inquiries about what he saw published on the Internet. CBC told him it
>> was none of his business and advised him if he thought his rights had
>> been offended to file a complaint. It appears the Plaintiff that
>> employees of CBC like other questionable Crown Corporations such as
>> the RCMP rely on their attorneys far too much to defend them from
>> litigation they invite from citizens they purportedly serve. The
>> employees of CBC named within the aforementioned and the CBC Legal
>> Dept. are very familiar with the Plaintiff and of the Crown barring
>> him from legislative properties while he running for public office.
>>
>> 82.  The Plaintiff states that any politician or police officer should
>> have seen enough of Barry Winter’s WordPress blog by June 22, 2015
>> particularly after the very unnecessary demise of two men in Alberta
>> because of the incompetence of the EPS. Barry Winters was blogging
>> about the EPS using battering ram in order to execute a warrant for a
>> 250 dollar bylaw offence at the same time Professor Kris Wells
>> revealed in a televised interview that the EPS member who was killed
>> was the one investigating the cyber harassment of him. It was obvious
>> why the police and politicians ignored all the death threats, sexual
>> harassment, cyberbullying and hate speech of a proud Zionist who
>> claimed to be a former CF officer who now working for the Department
>> of National Defence (DND). It is well known that no politician in
>> Canada is allowed to sit in Parliament as a member of the major
>> parties unless they support Israel. Since 2002 the Plaintiff made it
>> well known that he does not support Israeli actions and was against
>> the American plan to make war on Iraq. On Aril 1, 2003 within two
>> weeks of the beginning of the War on Iraq, the US Secret Service
>> threatened to practice extraordinary rendition because false
>> allegations of a Presidential threat were made against him by an
>> American court. However, the Americans and the Crown cannot deny that
>> what he said in two courts on April 1, 2003 because he published the
>> recordings of what was truly said as soon as he got the court tapes.
>> The RCMP knows those words can still be heard on the Internet today.
>> In 2009, the Plaintiff began to complain of Barry Winters about
>> something far more important to Canada as nation because of Winters’
>> bragging of being one of 24 CF officers who assisted the Americans in
>> the planning the War on Iraq in 2002. In the Plaintiff’s humble
>> opinion the mandate of the DND is Defence not Attack. He is not so
>> naive to think that such plans of war do not occur but if Barry
>> Winters was in fact one of the CF officers who did so then he broke
>> his oath to the Crown the instant he bragged of it in his blog. If
>> Winters was never an officer in the CF then he broke the law by
>> impersonating an officer. The Plaintiff downloaded the emails of the
>> Privy Council about Wikileaks. The bragging of Barry Winters should
>> have been investigated in 2009 before CBC reported that documents
>> released by WikiLeaks supported his information about Canadian
>> involvement in the War on Iraq.
>>
>> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>
>> January 13, 2015
>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>
>> December 8, 2014
>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>
>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>
>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>
>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>> campaign of 2006.
>>
>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>
>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>
>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>
>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>> essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An
>> ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear
>> and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,”
>> or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of
>> terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states
>> “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of
>> Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an
>> ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the
>> Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
>>
>> One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty
>> was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the
>> amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time
>> denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time
>> self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of
>> “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the
>> G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious
>> behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister
>> Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully
>> cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits
>> are not.
>>
>> Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal
>> mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the
>> world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy”
>> David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security
>> and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can
>> and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing
>> “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war
>> criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending
>> tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
>>
>> In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
>> “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
>> successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing,
>> marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian
>> military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern
>> equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are
>> antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five
>> years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that
>> won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
>>
>> My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
>> Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin
>> Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not
>> served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social
>> democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and
>> other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet
>> these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to
>> other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
>>
>> Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security,
>> and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before
>> shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
>>
>> Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now
>>
>> From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
>> Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and
>> the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still
>> alive
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
>> your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply
>> to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
>> Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the
>> War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
>> To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil,
>> Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, john.adams@cse-cst.gc.ca,
>> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, stoffp1 <stoffp1@parl.gc.ca>,
>> dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca,
>> milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca,
>> sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari
>> <smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
>> susan@blueskystrategygroup.com, Don@blueskystrategygroup.com,
>> eugene@blueskystrategygroup.com, americas@aljazeera.net
>> Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice" <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin"
>> <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower
>> <whistleblower@ctv.ca>
>>
>> I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David
>> Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's
>> Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on
>> CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To
>> be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested
>> that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise
>> if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else
>> about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact  that  your
>> old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English
>> never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is
>> interesting though
>>
>> http://www.blueskystrategygroup.com/index.php/team/don-newman/
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/media/story/2010/05/04/al-jazeera-english-
>> launch.html
>>
>> Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
>> this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
>> Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad
>> Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
>>
>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
>>
>> The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a
>> shy political animal
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>> Enjoy Mr Weston
>> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/news/story/2011/05/15/weston-iraq-invasion-w
>> ikileaks.html
>>
>> "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
>> brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
>> says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
>> to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
>> including a Canadian general.
>>
>> That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
>> who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
>> U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was
>> also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
>> prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
>>
>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2010/06/canada-and-united-states.html
>>
>> "I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
>> being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
>> demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
>> "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
>> into the US policy.
>>
>> At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
>> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
>> in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
>> report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was
>> never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
>> were deployed WMD.
>>
>> Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
>> invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
>> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
>> (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
>> about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
>> that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
>> authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
>>
>> There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
>> its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
>> to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
>> folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
>> upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions
>> are to met before US troop can redeploy?  Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of
>> Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them
>> correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the
>> George W Bush administration was onerous
>>
>> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
>> military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
>> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
>> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
>> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
>> operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
>> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
>> ....not necessarily in that order. "
>>
>> You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
>> Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
>>
>> http://www.socom.mil/SOCOMHome/Pages/ContactUSSOCOM.aspx
>>
>>
>> 84.  The Plaintiff states that the RCMP is well aware that he went to
>> western Canada in 2104 at the invitation of a fellow Maritimer in
>> order to assist in his attempt to investigate the murders of many
>> people in Northern BC. The Plaintiff has good reasons to doubt his
>> fellow Maritimer’s motives. The fact that he did not tell the
>> Plaintiff until he had arrived in BC that he had invited a Neo Nazi he
>> knew the Plaintiff strongly disliked to the same protest that he was
>> staging in front of the court house in Prince George on August 21,
>> 2014. The Plaintiff was looking forward to meeting Lonnie Landrud so
>> he ignored the Neo Nazi. Several months after their one and only
>> meeting, Lonnie Landrud contacted the Plaintiff and asked him to
>> publish a statement of his on the Internet and to forward it to anyone
>> he wished. The Plaintiff obliged Landrud and did an investigation of
>> his own as well. He has informed the RCMP of his opinion of their
>> actions and has done nothing further except monitor the criminal
>> proceedings the Crown has placed against the Neo Nazi in BC and save
>> his videos and webpages and that of his associates. The words the
>> Plaintiff stated in public in Prince George BC on August 21, 2014 were
>> recorded by the Neo Nazi and published on the Internet and the RCMP
>> knows the Plaintiff stands by every word. For the public record the
>> Plaintiff truly believes what Lonnie Landrud told him despite the fact
>> that he does not trust his Neo Nazi associates. Therefore the
>> Plaintiff had no ethical dilemma whatsoever in publishing the
>> statement Lonnie Landrud mailed to him in a sincere effort to assist
>> Lonnie Landrud’s pursuit of justice. The Crown is well aware that
>> Plaintiff’s former lawyer, Barry Bachrach once had a leader of the
>> American Indian Movement for a client and that is why he ran against
>> the former Minister of Indian Affairs for his seat in the 39th
>> Parliament.
>>
>> 85.  The Plaintiff states that while he was out west he visited
>> Edmonton AB several times and met many people. He visited the home of
>> Barry Winters and all his favourite haunts in the hope of meeting in
>> person the evil person who had been sexually harassing and threatening
>> to kill him and his children for many years. The Crown cannot deny
>> that Winters invited him many times. On June 13, 2015 Barry Winters
>> admitted the EPS warned him the Plaintiff was looking for him.
>>
>> On 12/21/15, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Rabson, Mia" <Mia.Rabson@freepress.mb.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 20:45:36 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Wab Kinew
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> I will be out of the office until Monday, January 4.
>>> If you need immediate assistance please contact our city desk at 613
>>> 697 7292 or fpcity@freepress.mb.ca.
>>> Happy Holidays!
>>>
>>> Mia Rabson
>>> Parliamentary Bureau Chief
>>> Winnipeg Free Press
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Sarra R. Deane" <s.deane@uwinnipeg.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 20:10:12 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Wab Kinew
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> I will be out of the office until Thursday, Nov. 12th.  I will
>>> respond to emails upon my return. Miigwech and all the best.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:45:29 -0400
>>> Subject: Fwd: Attn Wab Kinew
>>> To: mia.rabson@freepress.mb.ca, Paul.Samyn@freepress.mb.ca,
>>> "carolyn.bennett" <carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca>, Doug@dougeyolfson.ca,
>>> doug.eyolfson@parl.gc.ca
>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/peacemaker-363019331.html
>>>
>>> Peacemaker
>>> Group pushes for Truth and Reconciliation chairman to get Nobel Prize
>>>
>>> By: Mia Rabson
>>> Posted: 12/19/2015 3:00 AM   | Last Modified: 12/19/2015 6:12 AM
>>>
>>> " Murray Sinclair already has an impressive resumé.
>>>
>>> He's the first aboriginal judge appointed to the bench in Manitoba,
>>> co-commissioner of the Aboriginal Justice Inquiry and chairman of the
>>> Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
>>>
>>> But if a group of Canadians has its way, he will get one of the
>>> highest honours in the world to add to the list: Nobel Peace Prize
>>> recipient.
>>>
>>> "He and Phil Fontaine should share a Nobel Peace Prize," said Wab
>>> Kinew, associate vice-president for indigenous relations at the
>>> University of Winnipeg.
>>>
>>> Kinew said a group of people in Winnipeg, Toronto and Ottawa are
>>> collaborating to nominate the two men, who they believe are jointly
>>> responsible for giving back hope to Canada's indigenous people that
>>> hasn't existed in a long time.
>>>
>>> "They made it into something that is peace-building and
>>> nation-building," Kinew said. "It has really transformed our country."
>>>
>>> Mia Rabson, Ottawa Bureau Chief
>>> 613-369–4824
>>>
>>> Paul
>>>  Samyn, Editor
>>> 204–697–7295
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:05:01 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Wab Kinew
>>> To: w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca, "Paul.Lynch"
>>> <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>, "Marianne.Ryan"
>>> <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2015/12/21/why-do-canadians-need
>>> -to-know-anything-about-injuns/
>>>
>>> http://www.uwinnipeg.ca/about/administration/avp-igca.htmlAssociate
>>> Vice-President, Indigenous Affairs
>>>
>>> Wab Kinew
>>> phone: 204.789.9931
>>> email: w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca
>>> Biography/Publications
>>>
>>> Executive Assistant
>>>
>>> Sarra Deane
>>> phone: 204.988.7121
>>> email: s.deane@uwinnipeg.ca
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --- Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are
> confidential and subject to copyright. They are intended only for the use of
> the intended recipient(s) and may be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission,
> conversion to hard copy, copying, circulation or other use of this message
> and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete
> this message and any attachments from your system.
>
> --- Avis de confidentialité : Ce message et toute pièce jointe sont
> confidentiels et assujettis au droit d’auteur. Il est de l’usage exclusif du
> ou des destinataire(s) visé(s) et peuvent être confidentiels. Si vous n’êtes
> pas le(s) destinataire(s) visé(s), nous attirons votre attention sur le fait
> qu’il est strictement interdit d’utiliser cette information, de la
> transmettre, de l’imprimer sur papier, de la copier, de la distribuer ou de
> la diffuser. Si vous n’êtes pas le destinataire visé, veuillez en aviser
> immédiatement l’expéditeur par courriel électronique et détruire ce message
> et toute copie de celui-ci.
>
> --------------------------------
> This email is a service from Liberal / Assistance.
>
>
>
>
>
> [J6PE8E-0WQN]
 

Adam D. Rodgers

Called to the bar: 2005 (NS)

Boudrot Rodgers Law Inc.

1-301 Pitt St.
Port Hawkesbury, Nova Scotia B9A 2T6
Phone: 902-625-2800
Fax: 902-625-2801
 
 

Why lawyers for N.S. mass shooter's spouse say her case should prompt change within RCMP

Lawyers hope the upcoming inquiry report addresses how police treat victims of domestic violence

 
Angela MacIvor · CBC News ·
Lisa Banfield, the common-law wife of Gabriel Wortman, testifies at the Mass Casualty Commission inquiry into the April 2020 shooting rampage in rural Nova Scotia. (Andrew Vaughan/The Canadian Press)

WARNING: This story contains distressing details of violence and intimate-partner violence.

When Lisa Banfield first met the RCMP investigator assigned to interview her, she was lying in a hospital bed with a bruised body, a fractured rib and spine.

"She was having a hard time just moving several inches in the bed, so she was in pain," Staff Sgt. Greg Vardy would later say in an interview with the public inquiry tasked with investigating one of the country's deadliest mass shootings.

It was the afternoon of April 20, 2020, when the two first spoke. Banfield was recovering at the Colchester East Hants Health Centre in Truro, N.S., with her sister at her side. Her injuries had been inflicted by her common-law partner, Gabriel Wortman, with whom she had been locked in an abusive relationship for 19 years.

She was Wortman's first victim in his violent attack. But, as Vardy revealed to Banfield while taking her statement that day, she was far from the last. 

Her partner had killed 22 people, including a pregnant woman, in a shooting rampage that started in Portapique, N.S., on the night of April 18, 2020 and spanned five communities. Vardy told her the violence ended 13 hours later when police shot and killed Wortman.

"Imagine learning all those things at the same time on that sort of platform. And while you're being told this information, you're being asked to give more and help and do whatever you can. Of course you're going to do that," said Jessica Zita, one of Banfield's lawyers.

"That was the vein in which she first encountered the officers, who were nothing but cordial, kind and respectful to her and her family."

The scorched rubble of the home registered to Gabriel Wortman in Portapique, N.S., where the violent rampage began. (Andrew Vaughan/Canadian Press)

Banfield and her lawyers now allege that encounter with RCMP sparked eight months of manipulation. They claim police officers used Banfield's vulnerable state as a victim to gather information they would need to eventually charge her criminally, without making it clear she was under investigation or that she could consult her lawyer. 

Banfield hasn't done a media interview since the mass shooting. She has only answered questions for police, her own lawyers and the public inquiry, the Mass Casualty Commission. Her legal team is speaking with CBC News for the first time since it outlined concerns about police actions in its final submissions in September.

Public hearings ended last fall after 230 witnesses helped the inquiry examine how Wortman was able to obtain illegal guns in the U.S. and remain undetected during his shooting rampage as he masqueraded as a police officer. Part of the inquiry's mandate is also focused on the police response and the role of gender-based and intimate partner violence.

Awaiting commission's report

Banfield's legal team is hoping the Mass Casualty Commission's final report, due to be released on March 30, addresses what can be learned from her experience — including how police should treat victims of domestic violence. 

"Deception is probably the best word to describe, in simple terms, how I think she was treated," Zita said.

Lisa Banfield, centre, enters Dartmouth provincial court on July 26, 2022, holding hands with two of her sisters and followed by her lawyer James Lockyer. (CBC)

Eight months after meeting the RCMP in her hospital room, Banfield, her brother James and brother-in-law Brian Brewster were charged for supplying ammunition to Wortman. At the time, RCMP said none of those charged knew about Wortman's intentions.

All charges were withdrawn last summer after the trio completed restorative justice, meaning they didn't face a trial and have no criminal record.

But Banfield hinted at the impact the criminal charges had on her when she testified at the Mass Casualty Commission in July 2022.

"Lots of people that I don't know have reached out and supported me until I got the charges," she said. "And then it stopped."

According to the Transition House Association of Nova Scotia, an umbrella group focused on preventing violence against women, Banfield has been unfairly blamed for her partner's crimes. 

"It was really unfortunate [RCMP] chose to charge her. They sent a very clear message to victims of domestic violence that they don't consider them real victims," said James Goodwin, a lawyer for the association.

Lisa Banfield, centre, was the long-time partner of Gabriel Wortman, who carried out the mass shooting in Nova Scotia in April 2020. Banfield's multiple police interviews detail how he emotionally and physically abused her for years. (Dave Irish/CBC)

The association expects the Mass Casualty Commission will address how Banfield was treated in its upcoming report.

"I think the commission will completely exonerate her, and find her to just have been a victim," said Goodwin.

Victim. Witness. Suspect.

On the night of the Portapique attack, Wortman dragged Banfield through the dirt in the dark, kicked and handcuffed her, then locked her in his replica police car. She escaped through the car window and ran into the woods where she hid under a tree overnight, according to interviews she provided to police and the public inquiry.

The public inquiry later heard how, after nearly two decades of extreme physical and psychological abuse, Banfield had gone into survival mode. She first shared detailed examples of that abuse with Vardy, a veteran RCMP officer of 30 years, over the course of three interviews in the spring and summer of 2020.

Vardy told the Mass Casualty Commission he was the lead interviewing expert for the Nova Scotia RCMP in April 2020, teaching other officers best practices and techniques. He was tasked with getting information from Banfield following the mass shooting.

He confirmed to the inquiry in July 2022 that Banfield was considered a witness in the early days of the police investigation. He also told Zita's boss, James Lockyer, a partner at the Toronto law firm Lockyer Zaduk Zeeh, during a phone call on April 21, 2020, that Banfield was not a suspect. 

Lockyer expressed concern to Vardy during the call that his client would become the target of an investigation. That's according to an email Lockyer sent to Nova Scotia crown prosecutors nearly a year later, on April 8, 2021.

"Mr. Vardy told me that Lisa was 'a victim.' She 'was in no jeopardy' and if there had been any thought of wrongdoing on her part, the police would have acted accordingly, and given all her necessary warnings and rights and immediate access to counsel," Lockyer wrote.

Lockyer has said he expressed concern to an RCMP investigator shortly after the shootings that his client would become the target of an investigation. (CBC)

Vardy responded on April 28, 2021. In an email to the crown, he said he never spoke to Lockyer about "jeopardy for the future, if that is what he is indicating."

He also refuted telling Lockyer he would notify him if Banfield's status changed in the investigation.

"This is not something I would do or say. In my almost 30 years of policing, I have never told a lawyer I would call them back if something changed," Vardy wrote in his email.

But Banfield's status did change in the weeks that followed, after RCMP learned her brother and brother-in-law bought ammunition for Wortman at her request. That's when her lawyers say she became a suspect and not just a victim or witness — a point they argue was never made clear to Banfield.

"I treated her with the utmost respect and dignity. And I still, if I were to see her today, I would treat her the exact same way. But now, I understand how she feels probably now," Vardy said in his interview with the commission.

"I don't make decisions about laying a charge."

Malicious prosecution lawsuit

Last November, Banfield filed a lawsuit against the federal and provincial governments as well as the RCMP, alleging malicious prosecution. In her statement of claim, Banfield argues she was charged because the RCMP wanted to deflect attention from mistakes police had made in responding to the killings and the subsequent investigation. 

The federal government filed a statement of defence on Jan. 31 rejecting those claims.

"The RCMP made the decision to lay the criminal charge against the plaintiff after determining that there were reasonable and probable grounds to believe she committed the offence and that laying the charge was in the public interest," said Patricia MacPhee, a lawyer for the federal Department of Justice.

Two men in Maine who helped Wortman obtain some of the guns he used during the rampage have never been charged.

Three women are shown seated at a table in front of a crowd of people. Banfield is flanked by her sisters Janice Banfield. left, and Maureen Banfield, right, as she testifies at the Mass Casualty Commission inquiry on July 15, 2022. (Andrew Vaughan/The Canadian Press)

Zita's firm is not involved in the lawsuit. However, she continues to support Banfield and her family as they wait for the inquiry to release its report. 

"At the time, while this was happening, while she was being interviewed, [RCMP] took great care to make sure that she felt comfortable," Zita said.

"But obviously now we know in hindsight those intentions might not have been so pure."

Need to call a lawyer?

During a six-hour interview at RCMP headquarters in Dartmouth, N.S., on April 28, 2020, Vardy told Banfield, "this is about you wanting to speak to me and assist the investigation, right?" 

He then said, "Whatever you say can be used as evidence, I said that to you and that's what I want you to understand."

When Banfield asked Vardy if she needed a lawyer, he replied, "No, I'm saying to you that this is, these are your rights."

He proceeded to tell her that if she helped Wortman bring guns and ammunition into Canada across the U.S. border, she could be charged.

Banfield did not say anything incriminating during that interview. 

Bruce Pitt-Payne, a former RCMP officer, says Banfield's treatment should be a case study for police forces across Canada. (CBC)

Bruce Pitt-Payne, a retired RCMP member who now runs an investigation and interviewing consulting firm, said Vardy didn't have an "obligation" to say that Banfield could call a lawyer because she wasn't being detained.

"But when she asks, I think in a spirit of fairness, then yes, many police officers would have said 'Yes, you can,'" said Pitt-Payne.

In its statement of defence to Banfield's lawsuit, the federal government said "there was no duty on the RCMP to inform the plaintiff of her right to counsel."

Caution questioned

Vardy told the public inquiry he cautioned Banfield on July 28, 2020, at RCMP headquarters. Transcripts from that interview show that he told Banfield she was free to leave at any time and the doors were unlocked.

"I think you know how I've treated you since April," said Vardy. "Obviously I would get up and take you out, right. So basically, whatever you do say can be used as evidence."

It was during that interview Banfield disclosed her involvement in the transfer of ammunition within Canada.

Banfield, left, stands with a Nova Scotia RCMP investigator near the remains of the gunman's warehouse in Portapique, N.S., in October 2020, during a re-enactment of the events that took place on April 18, 2020. (Mass Casualty Commission)

Pitt-Payne said it was a "soft" caution that could have been worded more explicitly to let Banfield know she was under investigation, rather than simply helping police gather evidence.

"It wasn't 'you are a suspect' or 'you are under investigation.' It was less wordy and less conclusive than that. So the argument would be that she didn't understand it because it wasn't given the complete, full way that the court would expect it for a traumatized person," said Pitt-Payne.

Zita agrees the language should have been more clear.

"She would not have left that interview knowing that she was under criminal investigation. And that's what a caution is supposed to tell someone who is under investigation," she said.

"He made a reference to, I suppose, the caution that he gave previously.... But the law says that any time criminal jeopardy has changed and the circumstances in which you find yourself in a criminal investigation have changed, you have to be cautioned again. You have to be warned again."

Zita argues that did not happen during the July interview.

Banfield later co-operated in a re-enactment video with RCMP in Portapique in October 2020 — just weeks before she was criminally charged. Zita said that demonstrates her client's willingness to help.

"The fact that Lisa, at that time, unbeknownst to no one else other than the police, was also under criminal investigation … that's no situation that any right-minded citizen would want to find themselves in," she said.

Jessica Zita, lawyer for Lisa Banfield, alleges RCMP manipulated her client following the mass shooting in 2020. Jessica Zita is one of the lawyers who represented Banfield at the public inquiry. She hopes the upcoming final report from the Mass Casualty Commission includes recommendations on how police should treat victims of domestic violence. (Michael Cole/CBC)

In their final written submission to the public inquiry, Zita and Lockyer described Banfield's case as the "antithesis of how victims of domestic violence should be handled by the authorities." 

"She was re-victimized by the authorities," they wrote. "She already had extreme feelings of guilt and the charges magnified them. She did not know of the police [and Crown] intentions until she was charged in December and, once charged, on counsel's advice she was silenced from that time forward."

'Case study' for police

Kerri Froc, an associate professor in the University of New Brunswick's law faculty, said based on evidence presented to the public inquiry, it's clear Banfield was a victim of coercive control, which is defined as behaviours that manipulate, intimidate and instill fear in an intimate partner.

She said it's disappointing to hear "the police seemingly haven't learned anything."

"Once it turned from evidence gathering from a witness to trying to build a case against the suspect of a crime, it seems like disregarding her experiences of abuse and continuing to collect this evidence with a view to building some sort of small case against her … I really wonder if that brings the administration of justice into disrepute," said Froc.

In an email to CBC News, RCMP spokesperson Cpl. Chris Marshall said police "gave each of the three people charged appropriate and lawful cautions on every occasion."

"Throughout its investigation, the RCMP employed a trauma-informed approach with all the witnesses involved, be they victims, members of the public or potential suspects," he said.

Pitt-Payne believes the treatment of Banfield in particular should be a case study for the RCMP and other police forces going forward. 

"The question overall is back to domestic violence — how are they going to change this in the future? And that's what I think should come from this," he said.


What a public inquiry revealed about the Nova Scotia mass shooting

3 months ago
Duration 13:42
A look at what unfolded behind the scenes on the day of and days following the 2020 tragedy in Portapique, N.S., where a lone gunman masqueraded as a police officer and killed 22 people, including a pregnant woman, in five rural communities over a period of 13 hours. CBC Halifax's Angela MacIvor reports.

Zita also said the commission's upcoming final report needs to come back to the topic of intimate partner violence. Specifically, her law firm hopes recommendations are focused on how police should communicate with such victims when their criminal jeopardy changes.

However, Zita's disappointment with the RCMP is not limited to the treatment of Banfield.

"The way that all the victims were treated in the months that directly followed from this … I think that's going to be one of the things that the commission will take to task in its upcoming report," she said.

"I know that the people involved in this, the families, the anticipation is high for the report, and I hope the end result helps with their healing."

Twenty-two people were killed by the mass shooter on April 18 and 19, 2020. Top row from left: Gina Goulet, Dawn Gulenchyn, Jolene Oliver, Frank Gulenchyn, Sean McLeod, Alanna Jenkins. Second row: John Zahl, Lisa McCully, Joey Webber, Heidi Stevenson, Heather O'Brien and Jamie Blair. Third row from top: Kristen Beaton, Lillian Campbell, Joanne Thomas, Peter Bond, Tom Bagley and Greg Blair. Bottom row: Emily Tuck, Joy Bond, Corrie Ellison and Aaron Tuck. (CBC)

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Angela MacIvor

Reporter

Angela MacIvor is a reporter with the CBC Atlantic investigative unit. She has been with CBC since 2006 as a reporter and producer in all three Maritime provinces. All news tips welcome. Send an email to angela.macivor@cbc.ca

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
 
 
 
 

Charges against spouse of Nova Scotia mass killer were 'lawful,' Crown says

Federal lawyers file statement of defence rejecting Lisa Banfield's accusation of malicious prosecution

 
Michael Tutton · The Canadian Press ·
Lisa Banfield, the partner of Gabriel Wortman, testifies at the Mass Casualty Commission inquiry into the mass murders in rural Nova Scotia on April 18/19, 2020, in Halifax on Friday, July 15, 2022. Wortman, dressed as an RCMP officer and driving a replica police cruiser, murdered 22 people. (Andrew Vaughan/The Canadian Press)

Federal lawyers say it was lawful and reasonable to charge the spouse of the man responsible for the Nova Scotia mass shooting for supplying him with ammunition.

Lawyer Patricia MacPhee made the argument in a written statement of defence before the Nova Scotia Supreme Court.

She rejects the accusation by Lisa Banfield that the RCMP conspired to stage a malicious prosecution against her.

Banfield is suing the provincial and federal governments over the charge of providing ammunition to her common-law spouse, Gabriel Wortman.

Wortman killed 22 people on April 18-19, 2020, using multiple firearms and driving a replica RCMP patrol car.

Banfield alleges she was charged in December 2020 because the RCMP wanted to deflect attention from mistakes police made during the response and investigation into the killings.

In her statement of claim, filed in October 2022, Banfield says her reputation and quality of life were damaged, and that she endured pain and suffering, loss of income, out-of-pocket expenses, legal fees and cost of care.

MacPhee says Banfield was cautioned during police interviews that statements about providing ammunition to her spouse could be used as evidence.

'Lawful, reasonable and just'

"Canada denies that the RCMP instigated a baseless investigation into the plaintiff's involvement in the mass casualty," reads the court document filed Jan. 31. "It was lawful, reasonable and just for the RCMP to investigate how the perpetrator acquired the firearms, associated equipment and ammunition to carry out the mass casualty."

Banfield was interviewed several times by RCMP investigators in 2020 — on April 19, 20 and 28, and again on Oct. 23. Her lawyers have said she was never told she could have a lawyer with her.

In the statement of defence, MacPhee says, "there was no duty on the RCMP to inform the plaintiff of her right to counsel."

"She had legal counsel since April 20, 2020, and it was her decision whether to have counsel present."

MacPhee says Banfield went through restorative justice after she was charged, and "ultimately accepted responsibility for the offence, effectively admitting the truth of the allegations against her, which defeats her claim of defamation against the RCMP."

The RCMP charged Banfield, her brother and brother-in-law with unlawfully transferring the killer ammunition, after they provided him with .223-calibre Remington cartridges and .40-calibre Smith and Wesson cartridges.

Police acknowledged at the time that the three had no knowledge of what the gunman would do, and the Crown withdrew the charges after the trio participated in a restorative justice program.


CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
 
 

Patricia MacPhee

Patricia MacPhee works as Senior Counsel for Justice Canada.
Patricia can be reached at 902-426-7914
First name
Patricia
Last name
MacPhee
Title
Senior Counsel
Telephone Number
902-426-7914
Alternate Number

Fax Number
902-426-1351
Email

Street Address
Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 (view on map)
Country
Canada
Province
Nova Scotia
City
Halifax
Postal Code
B3J 1P3
Department
JUS-JUS

Justice Canada
Organization
CL-CCC

CIVIL LITIGATION AND ADVISORY


Patricia MacPhee's team




Alan Farquhar Legal Counsel 902-426-9103 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Ami Assignon Legal Counsel 902-426-4434 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Amy Blue Paralegal 902-426-5868 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Amy Smeltzer Legal Counsel 902-426-4349 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Angela Green General Counsel 902-426-0006 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Anjana Ravindran (2022) Legal Counsel 902-426-7594 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Anju Ravindran (2021) Legal Counsel 902-426-3260 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Anne O'Brien (2017) Legal Assistant 902-407-7461 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Annette Caines Legal Assistant 902-426-7563 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Annette Hartlen Legal Assistant 902-426-7040 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Catherine McIntyre Legal Counsel 902-426-9086 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Catherine Larade Paralegal 902-426-8898 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Catherine Hicks (2022) Paralegal 902-426-9068 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Cézanne Porelle (2016) Legal Assistant 902-426-7040 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Chandima Karunanayaka Legal Counsel 902-426-1197 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Clifford Soward (2021) Legal Counsel 902-426-3544 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Corinne Bedford Legal Counsel 902-426-0014 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
David Hansen (2017) Regional Director 902-426-3261 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
David Lewis Legal Counsel 902-426-3544 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Dean Smith Legal Counsel 902-426-6967 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Eamonn Murphy Paralegal 902-426-0092 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Emily Grant Legal Assistant 902-426-1798 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Esther Ricketts (2021) Legal Assistant 902-426-9407 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Ginette Mazerolle Regional Director and General Counsel 902-426-4258 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Gwen MacIsaac Legal Counsel 902-407-4453 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Heidi Collicutt Legal Counsel 902-426-2562 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
James Gunvaldsen Klaassen (2018) Legal Counsel 902-426-0020 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Jan Jensen Legal Counsel 902-426-8177 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Janice Mah Senior Paralegal 902-426-8204 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Jessica Harris (2018) Legal Counsel 902-426-5984 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Jessica Thompson (2022) Legal Counsel 902-426-5984 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Jonathan Tarlton General Counsel 902-426-5959 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Julien Matte (2017) Legal Counsel 902-426-3216 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Justina Sweeney Legal Assistant 902-426-6982 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Kaitlin Duggan (2021) Legal Counsel 902-426-2767 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Kaitlin Stephens Legal Counsel 902-426-2767 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Kate Dalziel-Crook (2016) Legal Assistant 902-407-7461 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Kathleen McManus (2023) Senior Counsel 902-426-6995 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Kathryn Hill Legal Counsel 902-426-7594 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia
Kayla Porter Paralegal 902-426-3260 Duke Tower 5251 Duke Street Suite 1400 Halifax Nova Scotia


Methinks the RCMP, Palango and even Andy Baby Douglas should understand why I am saving certain comments within the live chat in this video by their pal Seamus N'esy Pas David.Lametti?
 
 
 
 Contact information. Cpl. Chris Marshall Public Information Officer Nova Scotia RCMP Cell: 902-222-0154 chris.marshall@rcmp-grc.gc.ca.
 
https://thelaker.ca/cpl-chris-marshall-your-new-n-s-rcmp-public-information-officer/

Cpl. Chris Marshall: Your new N.S. RCMP Public Information Officer

By
Pat Healey
-


DARTMOUTH: The Nova Scotia RCMP is introducing new bilingual Provincial Public Information Officer (PIO), Corporal Chris Marshall. 

Originally from Saskatchewan, Cpl. Marshall spent a portion of his childhood in Nova Scotia before moving to Montréal, where he remained until he joined the RCMP in 2011.

Following graduation from “Depot” Division in Regina, Saskatchewan, he was posted to beautiful Shelburne, Nova Scotia in general duty policing.

After his time in Shelburne, Cpl. Marshall was transferred to Cheticamp in 2013, then Kingston in 2015.

After having completed seven years of general duty policing, Cpl. Marshall started a new role in 2018 with the Valley Integrated Street Crime Enforcement Unit (VISCEU).

VISCEU includes members of the RCMP and Kentville Police Service and is based at the New Minas RCMP Detachment.

“I am excited to start this new role and continue serving Nova Scotians in a meaningful and effective way,” says Cpl. Marshall. “I have spent almost 16 years of my life in Nova Scotia, and I consider this beautiful province my home.”

The RCMP would like to thank Cpl. Jennifer Clarke for her dedication to the role of Provincial PIO since 2016, and Sgt. Andrew Joyce and Cpl. Mark Skinner for their commitments to the role in the interim.
 
 

News tips, events or if you wish to advertise online please contact:

Pat Healey, Reporter/Marketing/Editor

19 John Murray Dr. Apt. 2

Enfield, N.S. B2T 1C9

Email: reporter.pathealey@gmail.com

Cell: 902-817-8054

 
 
https://www.unb.ca/faculty-staff/directory/law/froc-kerri.html

Kerri Froc

Associate Professor

PhD

Law, Faculty of

Room 204A

Fredericton

kerri.froc@unb.ca
 
 
 
Bruce Pitt-Payne LSM, CPII, LPI (BC) RCMP retired (Sgt)

Bruce Pitt-Payne LSM, CPII, LPI (BC) RCMP retired (Sgt)

Investigation and Interview Consulting and Training

Maple Ridge, British Columbia, Canada
5K followers 500+ connections


  PlayFair Investigative Consulting & Training Services
  Simon Fraser University

About

I specialize in teaching interviewing using principles that are scientifically supported, legally sound and ethically administered. Whether you are a law enforcement agency, a private-sector investigation group or a human resources professional, I will teach you how to interview in a way that maximizes the quantity and quality of information obtained and minimizes liability associated with poor skills. Contact us by email at brucegpittpayne@gmail.com to discuss our course offerings or to tailor workshops or courses  to your specific needs.

Bruce Pitt-Payne honed his skills as a major crime investigator and interview specialist over his 26 year career with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. He is a subject-matter-expert on investigative techniques including  interviewing adults (witnesses and suspects) and children. For several years he was the Program Manager of Investigative Interviewing Training for the RCMP in British Columbia where he was instrumental in designing the RCMP Phased Interview Model which is the P.E.A.C.E. Model of Interviewing after an evolutionary adaptation to Canadian legal and ethical standards. He has taught witness and suspect interviewing skills on both a national and international scale and prides himself with being able to explain complex matters in a manner that is easily understood. His teaching is adult-oriented and emphasizes audio-visual material as well as student participation.

Let us teach you how to conduct interviews that are ethical and efficient.

https://playfairinvestigativeconsultingandtrainingservices.ca/

The Ethical Phased Interview (E.P.I) Copyright 2017

The Ethical Phased Interview for Witnesses, Victims and Suspects is a scientifically-supported framework developed in Canada by RCMP member Bruce Pitt-Payne who was a subject matter expert until his retirement in 2017. It was developed from a myriad models (the United Kingdom’s P.E.A.C.E., the United States’ Cognitive Interview, Canada’s RCMP Phased Interview and Canada’s Step-Wise Suspect Interview) and is; therefore, robust and adaptable to any situation. The framework is based on best-practices and boundaries at both the Canadian legal and ethical levels, ensuring the goals of receiving information that is complete, reliable and admissible in Court. The courses include realistic scenario-based training methods that develop both competence and confidence.

The E.P.I. is divided into the following framework of phases:

Pre-interview Phase: Planning, Preparation & Review

Beginning Phase: Explain & Rapport

Middle Phase: Pure Version Account, Develop & Clarify (challenge)

End Phase: Close

Post-interview Phase: Evaluation

The E.P.I. may be used on anyone from whom you wish to obtain information through conversation. It follows two primary concepts; Cognitive Interviewing and Conversation Management but also involves aspects of Motivational Interviewing and the Strategic Use of Evidence. It may be used effectively in criminal, civil or human resource investigations and is effective and ethical when interviewing witnesses, victims and suspects. It may be used in either custodial or non-custodial settings. It is also designed to effectively and empathetically deal with witnesses and victims who have experienced violence and other forms of trauma. Furthermore, its principle-based approach allows it to be used with witnesses and victims who have mental or intellectual challenges.

The E.P.I. is neither confrontational nor accusatory in nature. It is not confession-oriented and because it does not incorporate a behavioural analysis interview, it lacks the inherent confirmation bias of some techniques or models that were not designed around scientific principles. It is principle based in that it is not to be used as a protocol; it is a toolbox or framework of scientifically-supported best practices that work best when applied to the idiosyncratic behaviour of an individual.

The goals of the E.P.I. are to obtain information that is:

a. complete;

b. reliable;

c. free of the biases of the interviewer or other persons; and,

d. consistent with Canadian legal and ethical standards

Although the primary goals of the E.P.I. are to obtain information, not to obtain a confession, a reliable confession would be an acceptable outcome should it happen. This means that it would have to have been obtained without having deprived the interviewee of the ability to choose whether to speak.

The E.P.I. is an approach built on best practices and may be adapted to any situation. For human resources investigations, its implementation would work well within the boundaries of policy, procedure and civil law. For criminal investigations, and those involving other federal, provincial and municipal statutes, the E.P.I. may be used within the boundaries set by legislation and the Courts. For example, the E.P.I. is consistent with the current Confessions Rule regarding oppression (R. v. Oickle S.C.C. ruling) as well as the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It should only be applied in a manner that would lead to a statement that would be deemed to have been voluntarily provided and; therefore, not inherently unreliable. It should also only be applied in a manner that respects the provisions of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms [Sections 7, 10(a) and 10(b)].

Please contact us for more info

brucegpittpayne@gmail.com

604-908-0120


 
 Bruce Pitt Payne
 
Bruce Pitt-Payne honed his skills as a major crime investigator and interview specialist over his 26 year career with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.

He was a full-time Team Leader on the "E" Division Interview Team as well as a part-time member of the Integrated Homicide Investigation Team's Special Project's Unit.

He is a subject-matter-expert on investigative techniques including interviewing adults (witnesses and suspects) and children.

For several years he was the Program Manager of Investigative Interviewing Training for the RCMP in British Columbia where he was instrumental in the creation and implementation of the RCMP Phased Interview Model which is the P.E.A.C.E. Model after an evolutionary adaptation to Canadian legal and ethical standards.

He has taught witness and suspect interviewing skills on both a national and international scale.

HEAD OFFICE USA+1 202 730 3035
Australia AUSTRALIA+61 3 9028 4205
United Kingdom UNITED KINGDOM+44 20 3287 4205
New Zealand NEW ZEALAND+64 9 889 4200
Hong Kong HONG KONG+85 2 8191 4206

EMAILINFO@INTERVIEWFORENSICS.COM

 

Locations

Head Office USA

1775 Eye Street NW Suite 1150
Washington,
DC 20006

PH: +1 202 730 3035

Australia

1A 26 Carbine Way,
Mornington,
VIC 3931

PH: +61 3 9028 4205

United Kingdom

Level 18
40 Bank Street
Canary Wharf
London E14 5NR

PH: +44 20 3287 4205

New Zealand

Level 27
PWC Tower
188 Quay Street
Auckland 1010

PH: +64 9 889 4200

Hong Kong

Two International Finance Centre
8 Finance St
Central
Hong Kong

PH: +85 2 8191 4206


I called again Correct Tom Taggart and Brad Johns???


Add star 

David Amos

<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>		Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 3:48 PM
To: brianwongmla@gmail.com, mla@esmithmccrossinmla.com, office@angelasimmonds.ca, info@loreleinicollmla.ca, info@carmankerr.ca, jessomeben@gmail.com, keith@irvingmla.ca, tonyince@tonyincemla.ca, info@braedonclark.ca, kendracoombesmla@gmail.com, claudiachendermla@gmail.com, info@patriciaarab.ca, brendan@brendanmaguire.ca, mla@northsidewestmount.ca
Cc: larryharrisonmla@gmail.com, garyburrillmla@gmail.com, ca@zachchurchill.com, info@iainrankin.ca, toryrushtonmla@bellaliant.com


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 15:47:24 -0400
Subject: Re: I called again Correct Tom Taggart and Brad Johns???
To: Tom.Taggartmla@gmail.com, "jagmeet.singh"
<jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, Candice.Bergen@parl.gc.ca,
NightTimePodcast <NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>, tim
<tim@halifaxexaminer.ca>, jennifer@halifaxexaminer.ca, paulpalango
<paulpalango@protonmail.com>, andrewjdouglas@gmail.com,
info@alidualemla.ca, suzyhalifaxneedham@gmail.com,
conflict.commissioner@novascotia.ca, kelly@kellyregan.ca,
info@ronnieleblanc.ca, Rafah@rafahdicostanzo.com,
info@mombourquette.ca, mla@northsidewestmount.ca,
LisaLachanceMLA@gmail.com, susanleblancMLA@bellaliant.com,
mlabradjohns@gmail.com, mlabradjohns.assistant@gmail.com
Cc: justmin <justmin@gov.ns.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, smcneil@coxandpalmer.com
...

[Message clipped]  View entire message



Add star 

David Amos

<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>		Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 5:15 PM
To: Daniel.Gould@novascotia.ca, nolan.young@shelburnemla.ca, kent.smith@novascotia.ca, barkhousemla@gmail.com, barbadamsmla@gmail.com, hello@digbyannapolis.ca, Info@trevorboudreau.ca, briancomermla@gmail.com, susancorkumgreekmla@gmail.com, stevecraigmla@gmail.com, beckydruhan.mla@eastlink.ca, patdunnmla@bellaliant.com, timhalmanmla@gmail.com, info@coltonleblanc.ca, johnlohrmla@gmail.com, mlahantseast@gmail.com, pictouwestmla@bellaliant.com, mlamacmaster@bellaliant.com, Kim.maslandmla@gmail.com, gregmorrow4gt@gmail.com, chrispalmermla@gmail.com, mlaritcey@bellaliant.com, michellethompsonmla@gmail.com, Johnwhitemla@outlook.com
Cc: LGOffice@novascotia.ca, speaker@novascotia.ca, PREMIER@novascotia.ca, "Sean.Fraser" <Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>, "stephen.ellis" <stephen.ellis@parl.gc.ca>, rokaku8 <rokaku8@gmail.com>, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, info@rebelnews.com, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, jbaron@theccf.ca, contact@win.donaldjtrump.com, kip@thevertigo.com, qm@icic.law, press@icic.law, info@truthcomestolight.com


https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2022/12/i-called-again-correct-tom-taggart-and.html

Thursday, 15 December 2022
Add star 

David Amos

<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>		Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 3:47 PM
To: Tom.Taggartmla@gmail.com, "jagmeet.singh" <jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, Candice.Bergen@parl.gc.ca, NightTimePodcast <NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>, tim <tim@halifaxexaminer.ca>, jennifer@halifaxexaminer.ca, paulpalango <paulpalango@protonmail.com>, andrewjdouglas@gmail.com, info@alidualemla.ca, suzyhalifaxneedham@gmail.com, conflict.commissioner@novascotia.ca, kelly@kellyregan.ca, info@ronnieleblanc.ca, Rafah@rafahdicostanzo.com, info@mombourquette.ca, mla@northsidewestmount.ca, LisaLachanceMLA@gmail.com, susanleblancMLA@bellaliant.com, mlabradjohns@gmail.com, mlabradjohns.assistant@gmail.com
Cc: justmin <justmin@gov.ns.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, smcneil@coxandpalmer.com


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Brad Johns, MLA Sackville - Uniacke" <mlabradjohns@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 11:27:16 -0800
Subject: Thank you for your email. Re: I called again Correct Tom
Taggart and Brad Johns???
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Hello,

This is an automated response to confirm that your email has been received
by MLA Brad Johns.

In order to help answer your concern in a timely manner please forward
your concern, with address, to mlabradjohns.assistant@gmail.com.

Any correspondence for the Attorney  General of Nova Scotia or the
Minister of Justice should be sent to justmin@novascotia.ca

In order to ensure constituent email is addressed in the most timely
manner, if you are a resident and you require follow up, make sure
that you
have included your residential address and contact phone number. This will
allow someone from our office to better sort, respond or directly
contact you about your concern much faster.

Please accept my apologizes in advance and thank you for your co-operation.

Brad


--
Brad Johns
Member of the Nova Scotia Legislative Assembly
Sackville - Uniacke
(902) 865-6467
 
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "kelly@kellyregan.ca" <kelly@kellyregan.ca>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 20:27:13 +0100
Subject: Auto Reply
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

[This is an auto reply]

Thank you for contacting the constituency office of the Hon. Kelly
Regan, MLA for Bedford Basin.  This office is here to assist residents
of the Bedford community.

In order to ensure a proper and timely response to your matter, please
include all necessary contact information in your correspondence,
including your name, address, phone number/e-mail, and the nature of
your matter.

This constituency office is a respectful workplace.  Please be advised
that we are unable to respond to communications involving profanity,
personal attacks,  racism, homophobia, or other forms of
discrimination.

Thank you and have a great day.


Traci Sullivan
Constituency Assistant
Office of the Honourable Kelly Regan | MLA, Bedford Basin
 902-407-3777 |  902-407-3779  | www.kellyregan.ca  |  1550 Bedford
Highway | Suite 555 | Bedford, NS B4A 1E6


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Lisa Lachance <lisalachancemla@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 11:27:17 -0800
Subject: Thank you for contacting MLA Lisa Lachance Re: I called again
Correct Tom Taggart and Brad Johns???
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

La version française suit

Thank you for reaching out to the office of Lisa Lachance, MLA for
Halifax Citadel–Sable Island. Lisa is thrilled to have been elected to
work with and for the people of Halifax Citadel–Sable Island! This
office is here to help residents navigate provincial programs and
services and advocate for constituents within those structures. We
also make referrals to other government and community agencies that
may be helpful. If you are in an emergency, please call 9-1-1.

As MLA, Lisa is able to bring the concerns and ideas of Halifax
Citadel–Sable Island to the provincial legislature and fight for the
issues that are important to you. We acknowledge that our constituency
is located in Kjipuktuk, within Mi'kma'ki, the unceded territory of
the L'nu people.

We will get back to you as soon as we are able. Thank you.

Sign up for our newsletter!

---

Merci d'avoir contacté le bureau de Lisa Lachance, député pour la
circonscription de Halifax Citadel–Sable Island.

Ce bureau est ici pour aider les résidents de Halifax Citadel–Sable
Island qui naviguent des programmes et services provinciaux et
advoquer pour ceux et celles dans ces structures; on fait aussi
référence à autres agences gouvernementales et communautaires qui
peuvent vous aider.
S'il s'agit d'une urgence, SVP faire appeler le 9-1-1. On reconnait
que notre circonscription se situe à Kjipuktuk, en Mi'kma'ki, la
territoire incédée du peuple L'nu.

On vous répondra dès que ça soit possible.



--

Marius van Leeuwen
Constituency Assistant to Lisa Lachance, MLA Halifax Citadel-Sable Island

any pronouns

P (902) 220-3021
E LisaLachanceMLA@gmail.com
Sport Nova Scotia Building
5516 Spring Garden Rd. Suite #304 Halifax, Nova Scotia
B3J 1G5
lisalachance.ca
[image: facebook icon] [image: twitter icon] [image: instagram icon]

Sign up for our newsletter!

The contents of this message come from the constituency office of Lisa
Lachance, MLA for Halifax Citadel-Sable Island and should be treated
as confidential unless otherwise indicated. If you believe you are
receiving this message in error, please let us know and delete the
message, including all attachments.




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Suzy Hansen <suzyhalifaxneedham@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 11:27:17 -0800
Subject: Thank you for your email. Re: I called again Correct Tom
Taggart and Brad Johns???
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com


Thank you for reaching out to the office of Suzy Hansen, MLA for
Halifax Needham.  I am so thankful to be elected to work with and for
the people of Halifax Needham.
The office is here to help residents of Halifax Needham navigate
provincial programs and services and advocate for constituents within
those structures.
We also make referrals to other government and community agencies that
may be helpful.  As an MLA, I am able to bring the concerns and ideas
of Halifax Needham to the provincial Legislature, and fight for the
issues that are important to you.

I will get back to you as soon as I am able.
Take care and stay safe

Suzy Hansen
MLA Halifax Needham



--
Aisha Hum
Constituency Assistant for
Suzy Hansen, MLA
Halifax Needham
(902)455-7300
6080 Young Street, Suite 1000
Halifax, NS B3K 5L2

Stay in touch. Sign up for my newsletter: Newsletter




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Susan Leblanc <susanleblancMLA@bellaliant.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 15:31:18 -0400
Subject: RE: I called again Correct Tom Taggart and Brad Johns???
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Thank-you for reaching out to the constituency office for Susan Leblanc, MLA
for Dartmouth North. We have moved to 192 Wyse Road, Unit 1A (the second
door on the front of the building, after the main lobby). The new office is
located across the parking lot from the Sobeys on Wyse Road.



If you are looking for COVID-19 rapid tests, they are in our entry way.



This office is here to help residents of Dartmouth North navigate provincial
programs and services and advocate for constituents within those structures.
We also make referrals to other government and community agencies that may
be helpful. As an MLA Susan is able to bring the concerns and ideas of
Dartmouth North to the provincial legislature and fight for the issues that
are important to you.


Many of the phone numbers and forms that we give out can be found on Sue's
website here https://www.susanleblanc.ca/resources Sue's consent form (if
you want us to talk to other government departments or agencies about your
issue) is here www.susanleblanc.ca/contact-susan
<http://www.susanleblanc.ca/contact-susan>



We will get back to you as soon as we are able,



Rebecca Rose

She/her

Constituency Coordinator

Susan Leblanc

MLA Dartmouth North

NDP Caucus Chair

*We have moved to 192 Wyse Road, Unit 1A on April 29th!



Sign up for Susan's e-newsletter
<https://facebook.us17.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=d170009c852be0f8a6b064ec1
&id=c2a805a1c7> here!

_________________

Constituency Office

260 Wyse Rd Suite 102

Dartmouth, NS

B3A 1N3



902-463-6670



WEB PAGE: https://www.susanleblanc.ca/









Rebecca Rose

She/her

Constituency Coordinator

Susan Leblanc

MLA Dartmouth North

NDP House Leader

*We have moved to 192 Wyse Road. (The second door, right after the main
lobby, ground floor.)



Sign up for Susan's e-newsletter here
<https://facebook.us17.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=d170009c852be0f8a6b064ec1
&id=c2a805a1c7> !

_________________

Constituency Office

192 Wyse Road, Unit 1A (second door after the main lobby, ground floor)

Dartmouth, NS

B3A 1N3



902-463-6670


WEB PAGE: https://www.susanleblanc.ca/


Deja Vu Anyone????

Yo Premier Iain Rankin Methinks somebody should tell your buddy Timmy
Boy Houston he picked a bad day not to come to the phone N'esy Pas?

David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>    Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 2:48 PM
To: BOB! B-O-B <coachwhitford1@gmail.com>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

JD is just another piece of chickenshit Feel Free to tell him I said so

On 8/6/21, BOB! B-O-B <coachwhitford1@gmail.com> wrote:
> I listened to the court recordings, quite the difference in the sound of
> Justice Bell's (I think his name is) when he came back from recess. Very
> low voice and at times choking on his own words. Also the other justice,
> Leblanc was it? He started off forcefully telling you "not to speak when I
> am speaking", then after you patiently waited your turn and unloaded a few
> of your facts his demeanor did a complete 180. Things that make you go
> hmmmmm. Interesting stuff you sent.
>
> So what's JD's story? Is he a stand up guy or what?
>
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 2:01 AM David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2021 18:02:43 -0300
>> Subject: Fwd: Yo Premier Iain Rankin Methinks somebody should tell
>> your buddy Timmy Boy Houston he picked a bad day not to come to the
>> phone N'esy Pas?
>> To: brianwongpc2021@gmail.com, votemarni@gmail.com,
>> anthony.edmonds@greenpartyns.ca, christina.mccarron@nsndp.ca
>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
>> "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, pathealey@gmail.com
>>
>>
>> https://thelaker.ca/election-21-wfrbb-atlantica-party-candidate-shawn-whitford/
>>
>> ELECTION 21 WFRBB: Atlantica Party candidate Shawn Whitford
>> By The Laker -July 30, 2021
>>
>> Shawn Whitford has lived in Waverley-Fall River-Beaver Bank for over
>> 20 years, served as a volunteer for more than 10 years and I feel it’s
>> time to take this next step to serve and represent our community.
>>
>>  Liberal, Conservative, Liberal, Conservative, Liberal, Conservative,
>> NDP, Liberal …. see the pattern? Has anything really changed? I fail
>> to see any progress. I hear lots of talk but no real solutions.
>>
>> If we truly want to tackle issues such as affordable housing and
>> inequality then we must face the root cause, GOVERNMENT!
>>
>> Who/what is the Atlantica Party you ask? A party that believes in the
>> people. A party that believes in the entrepreneurial spirit. A party
>> that will lead with common sense, bringing the Legislature back to its
>> roots, to where it belongs, the people of Nova Scotia!
>>
>> It most certainly doesn’t hurt to have a viable option when it comes
>> to politics these days. We need change for the better in this province
>> and the same old, same old does not and will never represent change.
>>
>> Before we can talk about solutions to the many issues facing this
>> province we first must deal with the root cause, the Legislature.
>>
>> We need to return to transparency, oversight and a Legislature that
>> works for the will of the people.
>>
>> I’m looking forward to a busy and exciting August!
>>
>>
>> Social Media:
>>
>> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100071128762676
>>
>> Party FB page: https://www.facebook.com/AtlanticaPartyNS
>>
>>
>> https://thelaker.ca/burrill-campaigns-with-mccarron-in-grand-lake-fall-river/
>>
>>
>> https://thelaker.ca/advertorial-waverley-fall-river-beaver-bank-pc-candidate-brian-wong-concerned-for-safety-of-grand-lake/
>>
>> https://thelaker.ca/election21-wfrbb-liberal-partys-marni-tuttle/
>>
>> @ReprtrPatHealey·30 Jul
>> VIDEO: @IainTRankin arrives to canvass in #FallRiverNS then #EnfieldNS
>> #HantsEast @MarniTuttle
>>
>> News tips, events or if you wish to advertise online please contact:
>>
>> Pat Healey, Reporter/Marketing
>>
>> 79 John Murray Dr. Apt. 2
>>
>> Enfield, N.S. B2T 1C9
>>
>> Email: reporter.pathealey@gmail.com
>>
>> Cell: 902-817-8054
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2021 16:07:54 -0300
>> Subject: Fwd: Yo Premier Iain Rankin Methinks somebody should tell
>> your buddy Timmy Boy Houston he picked a bad day not to come to the
>> phone N'esy Pas?
>> To: mark.robertson@atlanticaparty.ca, ryan.smyth@atlanticaparty.ca,
>> alan.nightingale@atlanticaparty.ca, steven.foster@atlanticaparty.ca
>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Justice Minister <JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>
>> Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2021 18:42:37 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: YO Donald Trump Jr. At least I know for
>> certain that the one corrupt ex cop remembers me because I called you
>> again today N'esy Pas Pierre-Yves Bourduas?
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for your email to the Minister of Justice. Please be assured
>> that it has been received by the Department. Your email will be
>> reviewed and addressed accordingly. Thank you.
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
>> Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2021 19:03:37 +0000
>> Subject: Thank you for your email to Premier Rankin
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for your email to Premier Rankin. This is an automatic
>> confirmation your message has been received.
>>
>> We recognize that many Nova Scotians have concerns about COVID-19. If
>> you are looking for the most up-to-date information, we encourage you
>> to visit: novascotia.ca/coronavirus<https://novascotia.ca/coronavirus/>
>> or canada.ca/coronavirus<https://canada.ca/coronavirus>. You can also
>> call the toll-free information line at 1-833-784-4397.
>>
>> If you are experiencing symptoms, please visit
>> https://811.novascotia.ca<https://811.novascotia.ca/>/ and use the
>> COVID-19 online self-assessment tool, which will help you determine if
>> you need to get tested. If you don’t have internet access, call 811.
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 14:54:52 -0300
>> Subject: Fwd: Yo Premier Iain Rankin Methinks somebody should tell
>> your buddy Timmy Boy Houston he picked a bad day not to come to the
>> phone N'esy Pas?
>> To: sheilagrichardson@gmail.com, fairviewclaytonparkndp@gmail.com,
>> info@nicolemosher.ca, scottellisneedham2021@gmail.com,
>> suzyhalifaxneedham@gmail.com, robin.smith@nsndp.ca,
>> colton4argyle@gmail.com, votepc2021@gmail.com,
>> cheryl.burbidge@nsndp.ca
>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Dominic.Cardy"
>> <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "Michael.Gorman" <Michael.Gorman@cbc.ca>,
>> nobyrne@unb.ca, Jenica.Atwin@parl.gc.ca, "Mitton, Megan (LEG)"
>> <megan.mitton@gnb.ca>, "kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca>,
>> kingpatrick278 <kingpatrick278@gmail.com>, Jim Karahalios
>> <jim@jimkarahalios.com>, "martin.gaudet"
>> <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
>> <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "michelle.conroy"
>> <michelle.conroy@gnb.ca>, ministryofjustice
>> <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, "freedomreport.ca"
>> <freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>, derekstorie85 <derekstorie85@gmail.com>,
>> "stefanos.karatopis" <stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com>, "Kaycee.Madu"
>> <Kaycee.Madu@gov.ab.ca>, kedgwickriver <kedgwickriver@gmail.com>,
>> "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)" <kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca>
>>
>> Deja Vu or what?
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1azdNWbF3A
>>
>> Me, Myself and I
>> 342 views
>> Apr 2, 2013
>> David Amos
>>
>>
>>
>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/thomas-trappenberg-kai-trappenberg-nova-scotia-election-1.4131028
>>
>> Meet the father and son running in Nova Scotia's election
>>
>> Kai Trappenberg, 18, is the son of Green Party Leader Thomas Trappenberg
>> Richard Woodbury · CBC News · Posted: May 26, 2017 7:00 AM AT
>>
>> Kai Trappenberg (left) is running for the Green Party in
>> Timberlea-Prospect and his dad, Green Party Leader Thomas Trappenberg
>> (right), is running in Clayton Park West. (Submitted by Thomas
>> Trappenberg)
>>
>> Yet CBC always illegaly ignored their non partison mandate and never
>> mentioned yours truly during 7 elections except ust once in 2005 as
>> they bragged of their world traveling NDP/PC hero Dominic Cardy
>>
>> Go Figure
>>
>>
>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276
>>
>> Fundy Royal campaign targets middle class with focus on jobs
>>
>> Fundy Royal voters have elected Conservatives all but 1 time in 28
>> elections over 101 years
>> CBC News · Posted: Oct 17, 2015 6:00 AM AT
>>
>> Four candidats are running in the federal riding of Fundy-Royal. Green
>> candidate Stephanie Coburn, NDP candidate Jennifer McKenzie, Liberal
>> candidate Alaina Lockhart and Conservative candidate Rob Moore.
>> (Courtesy of Stephanie Coburn, Jennifer McKenzie/Facebook, Alaina
>> Lockhart/Facebook, CBC)
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cFOKT6TlSE
>>
>> Fundy Royal, New Brunswick Debate – Federal Elections 2015 - The Local
>> Campaign, Rogers TV
>> 9,133 views
>> Oct 2, 2015
>> Rogers tv
>> 72.7K subscribers
>> Federal debate in Fundy Royal, New Brunswick riding featuring
>> candidates Rob Moore, Stephanie Coburn, Alaina Lockhart, Jennifer
>> McKenzie and David Amos.
>>
>>
>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/ndp-gets-help-from-democracy-expert-1.629834
>>
>> NDP gets help from democracy expert
>>
>> CBC News · Posted: Jan 09, 2006 4:23 PM AT
>>
>> An international expert on democracy has flown all the way from Egypt
>> to help NDP candidate John Carty campaign in Fredericton.
>>
>> Dominic Cardy is with a group called The National Democratic
>> Institute. Its members include such people as former U.S. President
>> Jimmy Carter. The group's mission is to teach democratic values and
>> spread democracy around the world.
>>
>> Cardy has taught about democracy in Algeria, Bangladesh, and Cambodia
>> during the past few years. When he heard his friend John Carty was
>> running for office back in his home town of Fredericton, he hopped on
>> a plane.
>>
>> "It was a strange experience," Cardy said. "One evening I was watching
>> the sun go down over the pyramids, and the next evening watched it go
>> down over Fredericton airport as I came into land."
>>
>> Cardy is no relation to the NDP candidate. But he loves elections and
>> loves getting people pumped up about democracy.
>>
>> Carty the candidate is running against federal Indian Affairs Minister
>> Andy Scott, Conservative Pat Lynch, Green candidate Philip Duchastel
>> and independent David Amos. The riding has sent Scott to Ottawa for
>> the last four elections, despite the best efforts of the other
>> parties.
>>
>> Cardy says he doesn't care how tough the race his – he just wants
>> people to participate in the process. "People have forgotten how
>> incredibly precious these gifts that our ancestors fought for are and
>> were just giving them away. It makes me furious when I talk to people
>> and people just say 'ah there's no point in voting.'"
>>
>> After election day, Dominic Cardy is flying back home to his wife in
>> Kathmandu, Nepal. He hopes to leave behind a new Member of Parliament
>> for Fredericton, his friend John Carty for the NDP.
>>
>> CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
>>
>> https://www1.gnb.ca/legis/bios/60/bio-E.asp?idno=11
>>
>> Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick
>> MLA Bios - 60th Legislature
>> Home | Français
>> Dominic Cardy
>> Hon. Dominic Cardy
>> Minister of Education and Early Childhood Development
>>
>> Dominic Cardy was born in the UK in 1970; his family moved to
>> Fredericton in 1971.
>>
>> Mr. Cardy was elected as the Progressive Conservative MLA for the
>> constituency of Fredericton West-Hanwell on September 24, 2018 and
>> sworn in as Minister of Education and Early Childhood Development on
>> November 9, 2018. He was re-elected on September 14, 2020 and
>> re-appointed as Minister of Education and Early Childhood Development
>> on September 29, 2020.
>>
>> He has a B.A. in Political Science from Dalhousie University.
>>
>> Mr. Cardy worked for the Canadian Department of Foreign Affairs on the
>> campaign to ban landmines, for the Washington-based National
>> Democratic Institute for International Affairs in increasingly senior
>> managerial roles, living and working in countries across Asia and
>> Africa, and then served as Asia-Pacific Director for the Ottawa-based
>> Forum of Federations.
>>
>> He was leader of the New Brunswick New Democratic Party from 2011-2016
>> and served as Chief of Staff to the Leader of the Opposition from
>> 2017-2018.
>>
>> He is a member of the editorial board of Inroads, a Canadian policy
>> journal, and has been a flying instructor since 1994.
>> Last updated : 10/15/2020
>>
>> However Higgy et al forgot to mention how much Cardy loves butter tarts
>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2018/01/yo-dominic-cardy-how-can-you.html
>>
>>
>> Friday, 12 January 2018
>> YO Dominic Cardy how can you Conservatives brag of buying Butter Tarts
>> when CBC tells me you dudes have to sell your HQ? Yet you wackos want
>> control of our provincial economy?
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/10/methinks-if-blaine-higgs-had-two-clues.html
>>
>> Tuesday, 10 October 2017
>> Methinks if Blaine Higgs had two clues between his ears he would not
>> have hired the Arsehole Dominic Cardy in the first place
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Justice Minister <JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 16:34:59 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: F Yo Premier Iain Rankin Methinks somebody
>> should tell your buddy Timmy Boy Houston he picked a bad day not to
>> come to the phone N'esy Pas?
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for your email to the Minister of Justice. Please be assured
>> that it has been received by the Department. Your email will be
>> reviewed and addressed accordingly. Thank you.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 13:34:34 -0300
>> Subject: F Yo Premier Iain Rankin Methinks somebody should tell your
>> buddy Timmy Boy Houston he picked a bad day not to come to the phone
>> N'esy Pas?
>> To: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>, Jane.Taber@novascotia.ca,
>> Chad.Lucas@novascotia.ca, Tamar.Brown@novascotia.ca,
>> JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca, info@nsbs.org, pictoueastcamp2021@gmail.com,
>> archy4preston@gmail.com, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, Office of the
>> Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>,
>> premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
>> colter.simmonds@nsndp.ca
>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "steve.murphy"
>> <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
>> wtvmedia@gmail.com, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
>> "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey"
>> <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>
>> Deja Vu Anyone???
>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/07/rallies-continue-push-for-public.html
>>
>> Wednesday, 29 July 2020
>> Federal and provincial governments to hold public inquiry into Nova
>> Scotia mass shootings
>>
>> https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
>>
>> David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
>> Replying to @DavidRayAmos
>> Methinks lots of folks may enjoy what Peter Mac Issac and his cohorts
>> said while the RCMP and a lot of LIEbranos were stuttering and
>> doubletalking bigtime N'esy Pas?
>>
>>
>> https://novascotia.ca/news/release/?id=20210305001
>>
>>
>> Land Titles Initiative
>>
>> The Land Titles Initiative helps residents in the communities of North
>> Preston, East Preston, Cherry Brook/Lake Loon, Lincolnville and
>> Sunnyville get clear title to their land at no cost.
>> Background
>>
>> For more than 200 years, many African Nova Scotians have been living
>> on land passed down by their ancestors without clear land title.
>> Without clear title, they can’t get a mortgage, bequeath or sell their
>> land, or access housing grants.
>>
>> Clarifying land title can be an expensive legal process. Under the
>> Land Titles Initiative, all fees will be covered at no cost.
>>
>> Media Contacts:
>>
>> Jane Taber
>>     Premier’s Office
>>     Cell: 902-237-0182
>>     Email: Jane.Taber@novascotia.ca
>>
>> Chad Lucas
>>     Communications Nova Scotia
>>     Cell: 902-478-7302
>>     Email: Chad.Lucas@novascotia.ca
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/angela-simmonds-721b75167/?originalSubdomain=ca
>>
>> Angela Simmonds
>> Executive Director, Land Titles and Strategic Special Initiatives.
>> Office of Equity and Anti-Racism
>>
>> https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1504205163303532
>>
>> WTV Media
>> JtalnnusfoaorSpmyons niornedc2t8  ·
>> Angela Simmonds is a lawyer and community advocate. Her research
>> brought the scale of the land title problem to light in 2015. She says
>> while some progress has been made since the funding announcement in
>> 2017, some North Preston residents have died waiting for land title.
>> https://www.northprestonland.ca/
>>
>> WTV Media is a multi-platform, multimedia source for Arts, Culture,
>> News, Sports, and Life, directly connected to the heartbeat of our
>> city, our young people!
>> WTV Media got its start as Waterfront TV, a weekly television show
>> produced by the Radio and Television Arts Students at NSCC's
>> Waterfront Campus.
>> Waterfront TV still airs on Eastlink TV in the Fall and Spring, but
>> we've evolved into much more!
>> Our team is made up of people like you. Our aim is to tell the stories
>> that matter to you.
>> http://www.waterfronttv.org/
>>
>> 80 Mawiomi Place
>> Dartmouth, NS,
>> Canada B2Y0A5
>>
>> (902) 491-1061
>> wtvmedia@gmail.com
>>
>>
>> https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-ns-police-officer-wife-launch-complaint-against-rcmp-for-driving-while/
>>
>>
>> N.S. police officer, wife launch complaint against RCMP for ‘driving
>> while Black’
>> Michael Tutton
>> HALIFAX
>> The Canadian Press
>> Published July 16, 2021
>>
>> A Halifax police superintendent and his wife, a lawyer, said Friday
>> they were launching a complaint alleging the RCMP stopped their
>> vehicle and ordered the officer out at gunpoint based on racial
>> profiling.
>>
>> The RCMP, however, issued a statement later in the day saying the
>> couple’s car matched the description of a suspect in a shooting
>> incident, and they said the officers “ensured a safe outcome to a very
>> stressful situation.”
>>
>> Dean Simmonds, a 20-year-veteran of the Halifax police, and Angela
>> Simmonds, a lawyer who was acclaimed this week as the provincial
>> Liberal candidate for Preston, say the incident of “driving while
>> Black” occurred as they were on their way to buy groceries in their
>> community of Preston at about 12:30 p.m. on July 4.
>>
>> Angela Simmonds, reached by telephone Friday, declined further comment
>> but said she and her husband stand by the details they provided in a
>> news release issued by the African Nova Scotian Decade for People of
>> African Descent Coalition.
>>
>> The coalition quotes the couple as saying that when they were stopped,
>> one of the Mounties ordered the 45-year-old police superintendent, who
>> was wearing plain clothes, out of the vehicle with his hands up, while
>> the other officer pointed a carbine rifle in his direction.
>>
>> It was only after several minutes, once Dean Simmonds managed to
>> explain who he was, that the two officers told the couple there had
>> been a report of shots fired in the area. The officers “did not
>> explain if Dean and Angela fit a description of the alleged
>> perpetrators,” the release says. “The experience was traumatic for the
>> couple, who feared for their lives.”
>>
>> Angela Simmonds is quoted saying the case was an example of the way
>> Black people continue “to be subjected to inhumane treatment and are
>> regarded as dangerous, dishonest, guilty criminals.” The release calls
>> the incident “another brutal reminder of the broader problem of
>> systemic racism within the RCMP, and it further erodes the trust
>> between police and Black communities in Nova Scotia.”
>>
>> The couple say they intend to file a complaint with the Civilian
>> Review and Complaints Commission “and want a full investigation into
>> the incident.”
>>
>> Cpl. Lisa Croteau, a spokeswoman for the RCMP, said in an e-mail
>> Friday that the suspect vehicle fleeing the scene was reported to be a
>> white SUV, with an out of province licence plate and tinted windows,
>> which she said matched the Simmonds’ vehicle.
>>
>> “The high-risk traffic stop involved a vehicle that matched the
>> suspect vehicle description, with an out of province licence plate,
>> that was coming from the direction of the nearby community,” Croteau
>> said.
>>
>> “Halifax District Operations Officers have examined the traffic stop
>> and the actions of our members. From the information we have gathered,
>> the traffic stop and the tactics employed by our members were in line
>> with RCMP policy and training. Additionally, our members ensured a
>> safe outcome to a very stressful situation, through a professional and
>> measured response.”
>>
>> The RCMP, she added, have received a complaint related to the traffic
>> stop, which they “take very seriously.”
>>
>> “The complaint has been provided to our professional responsibilities
>> unit and a public complaint file has been opened for thorough
>> investigation. Should new information come to light through this
>> investigation, we will take any and all appropriate actions.”
>>
>> Dean Simmonds says in the release he has been dedicated to addressing
>> the mistrust between the Black community and police. “I truly believed
>> that my core values, leadership and respect for my community, my job
>> and fellow officers would contribute to positive changes within
>> community policing,” he said.
>>
>> Heather Fairbairn, spokesperson for Nova Scotia Justice Minister Randy
>> Delorey, issued an e-mail statement Friday on behalf of the minister.
>> “The allegations are certainly concerning,” Delorey said. “I
>> understand a complaint is being filed, so it is important that I allow
>> that process to unfold. As this relates to an ongoing police
>> investigation it would be inappropriate for me to comment further.”
>>
>> Improper policing of Black Nova Scotians has an extensive history,
>> said Vanessa Fells, director of operations at the coalition. She said
>> that for two years the coalition has been calling on the RCMP to
>> collaborate with the group to establish an African Nova Scotian
>> policing strategy.
>>
>> “We have had absolutely no traction with it,” she said. “They seem not
>> interested. We need to stop what is currently happening and what has
>> been happening for decades and generations. It causes trauma to our
>> community.”
>>
>> The RCMP, which polices the suburbs of Halifax, was part of a study by
>> criminologist Scot Wortley released in March 2019 that condemned the
>> practice of street checks as creating a “disproportionate and
>> negative” impact on the Black community. The study found Black
>> citizens in the Halifax region were five times more likely to be
>> street-checked than white citizens. Street checks are the police
>> practice of randomly stopping people, collecting personal information
>> and storing it.
>>
>> On Nov. 29, 2019, Halifax police Chief Dan Kinsella issued an apology
>> before several hundred members of the Black community, but the RCMP
>> has yet to issue a similar apology on the street checks issue.
>> Kinsella said in a release Friday that the superintendent had the
>> right to pursue a complaint as a private citizen, adding that it would
>> be inappropriate for him to comment further.
>>
>> The phrase “driving while Black” became well known in the province
>> after a 2003 decision of the Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission in
>> the case of boxer Kirk Johnson, who was repeatedly pulled over by
>> police and once had his car seized. Johnson was pursued and his car
>> was towed after the officer wasn’t satisfied by the documents offered.
>> A board of inquiry ruled in 2003 that Johnson’s treatment was a
>> violation of his human rights.
>>
>>
>> Black police officer and Liberal candidate pulled over at gunpoint by
>> RCMP
>>
>> HRP superintendent Dean Simmonds and Preston candidate Angela Simmonds
>> file formal complaint against RCMP after terrifying ride to the
>> grocery store.
>>
>> By Gabrielle Drolet
>>
>> Read more at:
>> https://www.thecoast.ca/halifax/black-police-officer-and-liberal-candidate-pulled-over-at-gunpoint-by-rcmp/Content?oid=26797823
>>
>>
>>
>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/preston-candidates-2021-election-1.6116111
>>
>> Preston riding has all-Black slate of candidates
>>
>> One of Canada's oldest and largest Black communities has been
>> represented by a white MLA since 1999
>> Brooklyn Currie · CBC News · Posted: Jul 25, 2021 1:10 PM AT
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Justice Minister <JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>
>> Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 00:31:10 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Premier Iain Rankin tell your buddy Big
>> Bad Billy Casey to check out my old Chevy in the photo hereto attached
>> Trust that it is is still registered in Nova Scotia along with my
>> Harleys etc
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for your email to the Minister of Justice. Please be assured
>> that it has been received by the Department. Your email will be
>> reviewed and addressed accordingly. Thank you.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
>> Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 00:30:55 +0000
>> Subject: RE: Yo Premier Iain Rankin tell your buddy Big Bad Billy
>> Casey to check out my old Chevy in the photo hereto attached Trust
>> that it is is still registered in Nova Scotia along with my Harleys
>> etc
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you for taking the time to write.
>>
>>
>>
>> Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
>> to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
>> at the earliest opportunity.
>>
>>
>>
>> If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
>> Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
>> review and consideration.
>>
>>
>> Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
>>
>> En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
>> informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
>> meilleurs délais.
>>
>> Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
>> secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
>> pour examen et considération.
>>
>>
>> If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
>> (506) 453-2144 or by email
>> media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>
>>
>> S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
>> Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
>>
>>
>> Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
>> P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick E3B 5H1
>> Canada
>> Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
>> Email/Courriel:
>> premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/
>> premier.ministre@gnb.ca>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
>> Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 00:31:03 +0000
>> Subject: Thank you for your email to Premier Rankin
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for your email to Premier Rankin. This is an automatic
>> confirmation your message has been received.
>>
>> We recognize that many Nova Scotians have concerns about COVID-19. If
>> you are looking for the most up-to-date information, we encourage you
>> to visit: novascotia.ca/coronavirus<https://novascotia.ca/coronavirus/>
>> or canada.ca/coronavirus<https://canada.ca/coronavirus>. You can also
>> call the toll-free information line at 1-833-784-4397.
>>
>> If you are experiencing symptoms, please visit
>> https://811.novascotia.ca<https://811.novascotia.ca/>/ and use the
>> COVID-19 online self-assessment tool, which will help you determine if
>> you need to get tested. If you don’t have internet access, call 811.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada
>> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
>> Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 00:30:53 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic Reply
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
>> Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
>>
>> Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please
>> note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured
>> that your message will be carefully reviewed.
>>
>> We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.
>>
>> -------------------
>>
>> Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
>> Justice et procureur général du Canada.
>>
>> En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
>> prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
>> votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
>> avec soin.
>>
>> Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 21:30:48 -0300
>> Subject: Yo Premier Iain Rankin tell your buddy Big Bad Billy Casey to
>> check out my old Chevy in the photo hereto attached Trust that it is
>> is still registered in Nova Scotia along with my Harleys etc
>> To: PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
>> JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca, Naomi.Shelton@novascotia.ca,
>> gary.burrill@nsndp.ca, larry.duchesne@nsndp.ca,
>> lauren.skabar@nsndp.ca, feedback@nsndp.ca,
>> campaign.manager@greenpartyns.ca, info@atlanticaparty.ca,
>> provincial.admin@greenpartyns.ca, matthew.piggott@greenparty.ca, mcu
>> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
>> <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Ian.Shugart"
>> <Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, "Kevin.leahy"
>> <Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Michael.Gorman"
>> <Michael.Gorman@cbc.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
>> electivandrouin@gmail.com, trainorgreenpartyns@gmail.com,
>> anthony.edmonds@greenpartyns.ca, doug@doug4kingsnorth.ca,
>> krista.grear@greenpartyns.ca
>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, office@liberal.ns.ca
>>
>> Deja Vu Anyone?
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
>> Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 23:59:54 +0000
>> Subject: Thank you for your email to Premier Rankin
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for your email to Premier Rankin. This is an automatic
>> confirmation your message has been received.
>>
>> We recognize that many Nova Scotians have concerns about COVID-19. If
>> you are looking for the most up-to-date information, we encourage you
>> to visit: novascotia.ca/coronavirus<https://novascotia.ca/coronavirus/>
>> or canada.ca/coronavirus<https://canada.ca/coronavirus>. You can also
>> call the toll-free information line at 1-833-784-4397.
>>
>> If you are experiencing symptoms, please visit
>> https://811.novascotia.ca<https://811.novascotia.ca/>/ and use the
>> COVID-19 online self-assessment tool, which will help you determine if
>> you need to get tested. If you don’t have internet access, call 811
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Justice Minister <JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>
>> Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 23:59:59 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Premier Iain Rankin and his buddy
>> Big Bad Billy Casey who uses an old Chevy just like mine to promote
>> himself should sit up and pay attention N'esy Pas Mr Prime Minister
>> Trudeau The Younger?
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for your email to the Minister of Justice. Please be assured
>> that it has been received by the Department. Your email will be
>> reviewed and addressed accordingly. Thank you.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada
>> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
>> Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 23:59:42 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic Reply
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
>> Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
>>
>> Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please
>> note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured
>> that your message will be carefully reviewed.
>>
>> We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.
>>
>> -------------------
>>
>> Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
>> Justice et procureur général du Canada.
>>
>> En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
>> prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
>> votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
>> avec soin.
>>
>> Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
>> Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 00:05:01 +0000
>> Subject: RE: Methinks Premier Iain Rankin and his buddy Big Bad Billy
>> Casey who uses an old Chevy just like mine to promote himself should
>> sit up and pay attention N'esy Pas Mr Prime Minister Trudeau The
>> Younger?
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you for taking the time to write.
>>
>>
>>
>> Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
>> to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
>> at the earliest opportunity.
>>
>>
>>
>> If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
>> Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
>> review and consideration.
>>
>>
>> Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
>>
>> En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
>> informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
>> meilleurs délais.
>>
>> Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
>> secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
>> pour examen et considération.
>>
>>
>> If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
>> (506) 453-2144 or by email
>> media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>
>>
>> S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
>> Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
>>
>> Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
>> P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick E3B 5H1
>> Canada
>> Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
>> Email/Courriel:
>> premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/
>> premier.ministre@gnb.ca>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7/23/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Nova Scotia Liberal Party
>> > P.O. Box 723
>> > 5151 George Street, Suite 1400
>> > Halifax, Nova Scotia
>> > Canada B3J 1M5
>> >
>> > Tel: (902) 429-1993
>> > Fax: (902) 423-1624
>> >
>> > Email: office@liberal.ns.ca
>> >
>> >
>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/nova-scotia-election-liberal-iain-rankin-cobequid-tolls-1.6109796
>> >
>> > Rankin promises to nix Cobequid tolls, gets cool reception in Amherst
>> >
>> > Liberals made the same promise in 2017 election but didn't follow
>> > through
>> > Michael Gorman · CBC News · Posted: Jul 20, 2021 3:16 PM AT
>> >
>> > Liberal Leader Iain Rankin speaks in Amherst, N.S., on Tuesday, July
>> > 20, 2021, with protesters standing behind him. (Robert Short/CBC)
>> >
>> > The welcome mat wasn't exactly rolled out for Nova Scotia Liberal
>> > Leader Iain Rankin as he arrived Tuesday in Amherst, N.S., for a
>> > campaign stop.
>> >
>> > Rankin was in town to announce plans to remove tolls from the Cobequid
>> > Pass for passenger vehicles with Nova Scotia plates by Oct. 1, if his
>> > party is re-elected.
>> >
>> > But a group of about 15 protesters angry over public health
>> > restrictions made it challenging for Rankin to announce his plan.
>> >
>> > The protesters say restrictions put in place because of the COVID-19
>> > pandemic have cut them off from the rest of the province and
>> > neighbouring communities in New Brunswick.
>> >
>> > Some of them waved signs in support of Elizabeth Smith-McCrossin, the
>> > Independent candidate for Cumberland North. She was kicked out of the
>> > Tory caucus for her part in protests that shut down Highway 104 last
>> > month.
>> >
>> > Supporters of Independent candidate Elizabeth Smith-McCrossin
>> > protested a Liberal party campaign event Tuesday in Amherst. Thomas
>> > Everett, in sunglasses, holds a sign reading, 'Elizabeth for Premier.'
>> > (Robert Short/CBC)
>> >
>> > Thomas Everett, an Amherst resident who attended the protest, said
>> > removing the tolls now won't be enough to sway voters.
>> >
>> > "Cumberland County only matters when it comes to votes," he said.
>> >
>> > "When all the [COVID] cases were going on in Halifax and there were no
>> > cases in Amherst, we were locked down just the same way Halifax was,
>> > to appease Halifax residents."
>> > Locals already avoid the tolls
>> >
>> > Everett said locals who don't want to pay the tolls already drive
>> > through the Wentworth Valley on the old highway to avoid them.
>> >
>> > While the tolls will come off for passenger vehicles with Nova Scotia
>> > plates, they'll remain in place for commercial vehicles and cars from
>> > out of province.
>> >
>> > Rankin said that's to help pay for continued maintenance of the
>> > highway and to construct new rest stops and maintenance sheds along
>> > the Cobequid Pass.
>> >
>> > The Liberals also promised to remove the tolls during the 2017
>> > election. Rankin said the promise was to do so once the bonds were
>> > paid off, something he said would happen this September. Previously,
>> > the Liberals suggested the tolls would be gone by as soon as 2019, but
>> > that did not happen.
>> >
>> >     For every toll paid at the Cobequid Pass, private lenders have
>> pocketed
>> > half
>> >
>> > The Liberal leader, who moved indoors to take questions from
>> > reporters, said he wasn't surprised by his reception outside a local
>> > hotel next to Highway 104, where people hollered and waved signs
>> > behind him as he made his announcement.
>> >
>> > "Lives were disrupted in the pandemic and I think in Cumberland more
>> > so than any other region of the province," he said.
>> >
>> > "So I appreciate the frustration. At the same time, I hope that they
>> > can recognize that we were really trying to look out for the safety of
>> > all Nova Scotians, including themselves, and we had to make tough
>> > decisions. That's what managing a crisis like a pandemic is all
>> > about."
>> >
>> > Rankin campaigned Tuesday with local candidate Bill Casey, a longtime
>> > member of Parliament who came out of retirement to run in this
>> > election.
>> >
>> > Casey, the Liberal candidate for Cumberland North, stands in front of
>> > a campaign-branded vintage truck in his riding. (Robert Short/CBC)
>> >
>> > Casey said there are people in Cumberland County who are frustrated
>> > and feel like a political afterthought, but he wasn't sure some of the
>> > protesters who greeted him and Rankin were representative of the
>> > region.
>> >
>> > "I understand them but I don't think they're well founded in some ways
>> > and in some ways I do," he told reporters.
>> >
>> > "Cumberland County was affected by the closures of the border more
>> > than any other county. We're the only county in Nova Scotia that
>> > borders on another province and every day we're affected by New
>> > Brunswick regulations and Nova Scotia regulations. We're the only
>> > county that has to deal with that."
>> >
>> > Casey said it shouldn't be forgotten that Nova Scotia's response to
>> > the COVID-19 pandemic was among the best in the world.
>> > Tories, NDP respond
>> >
>> > The leaders of the Tories and NDP, meanwhile, criticized the Liberals
>> > for trying to make the same promise two elections in a row.
>> >
>> > Tory Leader Tim Houston, whose party is still searching for a
>> > candidate, said his party would remove all tolls from the Cobequid
>> > Pass right away if they form government.
>> >
>> > NDP Leader Gary Burrill said his party would remove all tolls from the
>> > highway as soon as the debt is paid off.
>> >
>> >
>> > ABOUT THE AUTHOR
>> > Michael Gorman
>> >
>> > Reporter
>> >
>> > Michael Gorman is a reporter in Nova Scotia whose coverage areas
>> > include Province House, rural communities, and health care. Contact
>> > him with story ideas at michael.gorman@cbc.ca
>> >
>> > CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > https://electionsnovascotia.ca/41ProvincialGeneralElection
>> >
>> >  Writs of election have been issued for the 41st Provincial General
>> > Election in Nova Scotia. Election day will be Tuesday, August 17,
>> > 2021.
>> >
>> > Elections Nova Scotia is an independent, non-partisan agency that is
>> > responsible for the administration of the Elections Act. Its mandate
>> > is to conduct Provincial General Elections and by-elections; ensure
>> > compliance with the provincial electoral law including the political
>> > financing regime; establish and maintain election-related information
>> > including the Nova Scotia Register of Electors; seek advice and
>> > conduct studies related to electoral processes; and, conduct electoral
>> > education processes.
>> >
>> > Naomi Shelton
>> > Director, Policy and Communications
>> > Elections Nova Scotia
>> > 202 Brownlow Ave, Ste 505,
>> > Dartmouth, Nova Scotia,
>> > B3B 1T5, Canada
>> > 902-424-3275
>> > Naomi.Shelton@novascotia.ca
>> >
>> > https://twitter.com/NaomiRShelton/with_replies?lang=en
>> >
>> > In Nova Scotia, we currently have five registered political parties.
>> These
>> > are:
>> >
>> > Atlantica Party Association of Nova Scotia
>> > Website: www.atlanticaparty.ca/
>> >
>> > Green Party of Nova Scotia
>> > Website: www.greenpartyns.ca
>> >
>> > Nova Scotia Liberal Party
>> > Website: www.liberal.ns.ca
>> >
>> > Nova Scotia New Democratic Party
>> > Website: www.nsndp.ca
>> >
>> > Progressive Conservative Association of Nova Scotia
>> > Website: www.pcparty.ns.ca
>> >
>> >
>> https://www.atlanticaparty.ca/News/details/jonathan-dean-returns-as-leader-of-ns-atlantica-party
>> >
>> > Jonathan Dean Returns as Leader of NS Atlantica Party
>> > Atlantica
>> > 11/20/2020
>> > Announcements
>> >
>> > The Atlantica Party is returning to Nova Scotia’s political landscape
>> > with former leader Jonathan Dean at the helm. Dean, who co-founded the
>> > Atlantica Party in 2006, resigned as leader two years ago after
>> > growing discord within the Party executive over Atlantica’s direction,
>> > prompting him to step away entirely.
>> >
>> > “I was not going to lead a boring party,” said Dean, a long-time
>> > investment researcher who opened his own consulting practice after
>> > leaving the Party.
>> >
>> > “I’ve always believed the Atlantica Party should stay true to its
>> > transformative core vision of smaller, more transparent and more
>> > democratic government with greater accountability to citizens,” he
>> > said. “From the very beginning, all of our policies were guided by
>> > those principles.”
>> >
>> > With a new executive in place, the Party conducted a membership survey
>> > in June. Dean said many Nova Scotians value the Party’s direction, but
>> > have been disappointed by the sense that “government commitments begin
>> > and end with election campaigns.”
>> >
>> > “Right now, we have a provincial government that campaigned on
>> > transparency then effectively shut down any democratic accountability
>> > by cancelling legislature committee meetings for six months during a
>> > global pandemic,” he said. “To say some voters are disillusioned with
>> > politicians right now is an understatement.”
>> >
>> > Dean said they are working to build on the momentum from the last
>> > provincial election when the Party had the best results in its
>> > history. He said the goal is to present Nova Scotians with “a common
>> > sense alternative” the next time they go to the polls. This includes a
>> > pro-market approach to business, and a greater emphasis on democracy
>> > and good decision-making.
>> >
>> > Party president Darryl Skeard said there is a lot of excitement around
>> > Dean’s return, and that plans are underway for a virtual annual
>> > general meeting designed to unite both new and long-time party
>> > members.
>> >
>> > “It’s a new era, but with Jonathan returning as leader, it’s also a
>> > re-commitment to our roots,” said Skeard.  “Jonathan has the vision,
>> > experience and solid integrity we need.”
>> >
>> > To arrange an interview with Jonathan Dean, please contact:
>> >
>> > info@atlanticaparty.ca
>> > For more information on the Atlantica Party, policy briefs, or to get
>> > involved, visit atlanticaparty.ca, facebook.com/AtlanticaPartyNS/ and
>> > twitter.com/AtlanticaParty.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> https://greenpartyns.ca/thomas-trappenberg-stepping-down-as-leader-of-ns-green-party/
>> >
>> > Thomas Trappenberg Stepping Down as Leader of NS Green Party
>> >
>> > 2021-04-30 By Krista Grear Leave a Comment
>> >
>> > FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
>> >
>> > Halifax 04/26/2021
>> >
>> > (Halifax)Dr. Thomas Trappenberg has announced that he is stepping down
>> > as leader of the Green Party of Nova Scotia. He has been leader of the
>> > GPNS since 2016 and has run several times as a Green Party candidate
>> > both provincially and federally since 2006.
>> >
>> > Dr. Trappenberg took on the leadership of GPNS, with Deputy Leader
>> > Jessica Alexander at a time when the party was at risk of dissolving.
>> > Since that time the party has stabilized and grown significantly. “I
>> > feel the party now has a firm foundation. I am proud of the successes
>> > we have had over the past five years. We have been a strong voice for
>> > the environment, standing up for our forests, our oceans and social
>> > justice,” he said.
>> >
>> > “We are a grassroots party and our members have indicated that they
>> > are ready for new leadership,” he added. As part of the Annual General
>> > Meeting of the GPNS held on April 25, the majority of members voted in
>> > favour of holding a leadership contest.
>> >
>> > This recommendation will now go to the GPNS Executive for decisions on
>> > next steps. Deputy Leader, Jessica Alexander, will be acting Interim
>> > Leader until that time.
>> >
>> > The Past President of the GPNS, Ashley Morton said, “The Green Party
>> > of Nova Scotia thanks Dr. Trappenberg for his leadership and thousands
>> > of hours of labour for the party. He is unquestionably leaving it in
>> > better shape upon his departure than when he took on the leadership
>> > role.”
>> >
>> > For more information contact:
>> >
>> > Ashley Morton, 902-999-7017
>> >
>> >
>> > Election to be called today – Open call for Candidates
>> >
>> > 2021-07-17 By Matthew Piggott Leave a Comment
>> >
>> > It’s time for a provincial election! It is widely expected that an
>> > election will be called today (July 17th) with an anticipated election
>> > day of August 17th, 2021.
>> >
>> > The Green Party of Nova Scotia aims to give every Nova Scotian the
>> > opportunity to vote for the candidate of their choice. If you are
>> > excited for change, want to take on a new challenge, or simply provide
>> > a new choice for you and your community then this may be the
>> > opportunity for you.
>> >
>> > All interested candidates who have been a resident of Nova Scotia for
>> > at least 6 months are encouraged to apply here: Green Party of Nova
>> > Scotia Candidate Application Form
>> >
>> > If you are approved the deadline to register with Elections Nova
>> > Scotia could be as early as July 28th, 2021 at 2pm.
>> >
>> > The Green Party will be offering an exciting team of candidates and
>> > will be announcing those candidates in their confirmed ridings soon.
>> > At this time we are searching for additional candidates on Cape Breton
>> > Island and on the South Shore between Digby and Queens Counties.
>> >
>> > For more information please contact campaign.manager@greenpartyns.ca
>> > or provincial.admin@greenpartyns.ca
>> >
>> >
>> https://www.greenparty.ca/en/content/federal-council-nova-scotia-matthew-piggott
>> >
>> > Matthew Piggott
>> > Federal Council - Nova Scotia
>> > matthew.piggott@greenparty.ca
>> >
>> > I first got involved with the Green Party in 2003. This is my
>> > political home. Whether we agree or disagree, all who have worked with
>> > me know I'm here for Green values and building long term
>> > relationships.
>> >
>> > Over the last 18 years I've held countless volunteer roles, mostly at
>> > the local EDA and campaign level, and with many provincial Green
>> > parties. I have twice held staff roles with the GPC.
>> >
>> > These values guide my involvement: Safe spaces are a non-negotiable
>> > requirement. Kindness and being reasonable should guide decisions.
>> > Commitment to diversity and anti-oppression are not up for debate and
>> > will help grow the party. Accountability should be aligned with
>> > influence. On doit etre une partie billangue pour etre une vraie
>> > partie national. Providing space for emotional safety goes a long way
>> > towards doing the grueling work of building a national political
>> > party. And most importantly, political parties must run on trust (or
>> > else they don't work).
>> >
>> > This next federal council needs to get back to basics. It is
>> > impossible to run a national party without functioning processes and
>> > party institutions. If something is missing we need to build it, and
>> > it's the role of Council to set the policy/procedures and then let the
>> > work be done. I'm stepping up at this moment to do that work.
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: Justice Minister <JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>
>> > Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 17:38:42 +0000
>> > Subject: Automatic reply: MLA Weekly Update and Decision Announcement
>> > (Case Ref: ES3077) Methinks Premier Iain Rankin is far more than
>> > merely welcome N'esy Pas Higgy?
>> > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > Thank you for your email to the Minister of Justice. Please be assured
>> > that it has been received by the Department. Your email will be
>> > reviewed and addressed accordingly. Thank you.
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 14:38:10 -0300
>> > Subject: Re: MLA Weekly Update and Decision Announcement (Case Ref:
>> > ES3077) Methinks Premier Iain Rankin is far more than merely welcome
>> > N'esy Pas Higgy?
>> > To: mla@esmithmccrossinmla.com, "Mike.Comeau" <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>,
>> > "Mitton, Megan (LEG)" <megan.mitton@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
>> > <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, Office of the
>> > Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>,
>> > michelle.stevens@novascotia.ca, heather.fairbairn@novascotia.ca,
>> > elizabeth.macdonald@novascotia.ca, Gary.Andrea@novascotia.ca,
>> > dkogon@amherst.ca, jmacdonald@amherst.ca, darrell.cole@amherstnews.ca,
>> > lifestyle@thecoast.ca, tmccoag@amherst.ca, Newsroom
>> > <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
>> > dpike@amherst.ca, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
>> > DJT@trumporg.com, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca,
>> > Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca,
>> > pm@pm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca,
>> > djtjr@trumporg.com, Donald.J.Trump@donaldtrump.com,
>> > JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca, Frank.McKenna@td.com
>> > Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, JUSTMIN
>> > <JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
>> > "barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "barb.whitenect"
>> > <barb.whitenect@gnb.ca>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
>> > washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Bill.Blair"
>> > <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: Justice Minister <JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>
>> > Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 17:19:07 +0000
>> > Subject: Automatic reply: MLA Weekly Update and Decision Announcement
>> > (Case Ref: ES3077) Methinks Iain Rankin and Elizabeth Smith-McCrossin
>> > cannot read but I certainly can N'esy Pas Higgy?
>> > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > Thank you for your email to the Minister of Justice. Please be assured
>> > that it has been received by the Department. Your email will be
>> > reviewed and addressed accordingly. Thank you.
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
>> > Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 17:19:03 +0000
>> > Subject: Thank you for your email to Premier Rankin
>> > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > Thank you for your email to Premier Rankin. This is an automatic
>> > confirmation your message has been received.
>> >
>> > We recognize that many Nova Scotians have concerns about COVID-19. If
>> > you are looking for the most up-to-date information, we encourage you
>> > to visit: novascotia.ca/coronavirus<https://novascotia.ca/coronavirus/>
>> > or canada.ca/coronavirus<https://canada.ca/coronavirus>. You can also
>> > call the toll-free information line at 1-833-784-4397.
>> >
>> > If you are experiencing symptoms, please visit
>> > https://811.novascotia.ca<https://811.novascotia.ca/>/ and use the
>> > COVID-19 online self-assessment tool, which will help you determine if
>> > you need to get tested. If you don’t have internet access, call 811.
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
>> > Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 17:21:14 +0000
>> > Subject: RE: MLA Weekly Update and Decision Announcement (Case Ref:
>> > ES3077) Methinks Iain Rankin and Elizabeth Smith-McCrossin cannot read
>> > but I certainly can N'esy Pas Higgy?
>> > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > Thank you for taking the time to write.
>> >
>> > Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
>> > to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
>> > at the earliest opportunity.
>> >
>> > If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
>> > Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
>> > review and consideration.
>> >
>> > Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
>> >
>> > En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
>> > informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
>> > meilleurs délais.
>> >
>> > Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
>> > secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
>> > pour examen et considération.
>> >
>> > If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
>> > (506) 453-2144 or by email
>> > media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>
>> >
>> > S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
>> > Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
>> >
>> >
>> > Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
>> > P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick E3B 5H1
>> > Canada
>> > Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
>> > Email/Courriel:
>> > premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/
>> premier.ministre@gnb.ca>
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <
>> mcu@justice.gc.ca>
>> > Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 17:18:59 +0000
>> > Subject: Automatic Reply
>> > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
>> > Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
>> >
>> > Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please
>> > note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured
>> > that your message will be carefully reviewed.
>> >
>> > We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.
>> >
>> > -------------------
>> >
>> > Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
>> > Justice et procureur général du Canada.
>> >
>> > En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
>> > prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
>> > votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
>> > avec soin.
>> >
>> > Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage
>> > offensant.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>
>> > Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 17:18:53 +0000
>> > Subject: Thank you for your email
>> > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>> >
>> >
>> > This is to acknowledge that your email has been received by the Office
>> > of the Premier.
>> >
>> > We appreciate the time you have taken to write.
>> >
>> >
>> > NOTICE:  This e-mail was intended for a specific person.  If it has
>> > reached you by mistake, please delete it and advise me by return
>> > e-mail.  Any privilege associated with this information is not waived.
>> > Thank you for your cooperation and assistance.
>> >
>> > Avis: Ce message est confidentiel, peut être protégé par le secret
>> > professionnel et est à l'usage exclusif de son destinataire. Il est
>> > strictement interdit à toute autre personne de le diffuser, le
>> > distribuer ou le reproduire. Si le destinataire ne peut être joint ou
>> > vous est inconnu, veuillez informer l'expéditeur par courrier
>> > électronique immédiatement et effacer ce message et en détruire toute
>> > copie. Merci de votre cooperation.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------- Original message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 14:52:40 -0300
>> > Subject: Re MLA Weekly Update and Decision Announcement (Case Ref:
>> > ES3077) I just called again
>> > To: PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>
>> > Cc: assistant <assistant@esmithmccrossinmla.com>, motomaniac333
>> > <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> >
>> >
>> > Media Contact:
>> >
>> > Matt Hefler
>> >     Office of the Premier
>> >     Cell: 902-220-6048
>> >     Email: Matt.Hefler@novascotia.ca
>> >
>> >
>> > Contact Elizabeth
>> > PHONE (902) 661-2288
>> > EMAIL assistant@esmithmccrossinmla.com
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: mla@esmithmccrossinmla.com
>> > Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2021 16:31:17 +0000 (UTC)
>> > Subject: MLA Weekly Update and Decision Announcement (Case Ref: ES3077)
>> > To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>> >
>> >
>> > Dear David Amos
>> >
>> > MLA Weekly Update&nbsp;
>> >
>> > Date Tuesday July 6th, 2021
>> >
>> > My Mission as MLA for Cumberland North
>> >
>> > Serve the people&nbsp;
>> > Build Unity &amp; Trust&nbsp;
>> > Influence Legislation &amp; public policy
>> > For the greater good.&nbsp;
>> > Educate and Build Capacity
>> > Promote the people and area,&nbsp;
>> > Build a world-class health care system&nbsp;
>> > And improve population health.
>> >
>> > I have some news to share to start the week.
>> >
>> > I don&rsquo;t know when Iain Rankin is going to call the next election.
>> >
>> > But I do know this.
>> >
>> > When Iain Rankin calls the election, I will be running as an
>> > Independent candidate for re-election as MLA for Cumberland North.
>> >
>> > You, the good people of Cumberland North know me.
>> >
>> > You know I will always put your priorities first.
>> >
>> > I will always fight for you.
>> >
>> > No apologies.
>> >
>> > Running as an Independent outside of party politics isn&rsquo;t easy.
>> >
>> > If the people of Cumberland North continue to stand by me, I will
>> > continue to fight for you.
>> >
>> > For better health care.
>> >
>> > For regional co-operation to keep our borders open.
>> >
>> > For getting rid of the Cobequid Pass tolls.
>> >
>> > For supporting local food and the farmers who make it happen.
>> >
>> > I&rsquo;m the only candidate in Cumberland North who doesn&rsquo;t
>> > have to answer to a party leader in Halifax.
>> >
>> > I&rsquo;m not a career politician.&nbsp;&nbsp;I&rsquo;m a registered
>> > nurse.&nbsp;&nbsp;I have owned and operated my own
>> > businesses.&nbsp;&nbsp;I have put people to work and met a payroll.
>> >
>> > Above all, I&rsquo;m a fighter who doesn&rsquo;t back down.
>> >
>> > With your support, let&rsquo;s put the people of Cumberland North
>> > first.&nbsp;
>> >
>> > I learned at a young age to stand my ground and I am not about to
>> > change now.&nbsp;
>> >
>> >
>> > Last Week in Politics&nbsp;
>> >
>> > Last week my staff and I worked with constituents on many matters of
>> > importance such as lack of family physicians, housing, roads, Covid
>> > rules and restrictions, NS NB Border, addictions and mental health and
>> > more.&nbsp;
>> >
>> > I continue to work with Municipal partners on various projects
>> > throughout Cumberland North,&nbsp;
>> >
>> >
>> > This Week In Politics
>> >
>> > Local
>> > This week I will be meeting with constituents to continue to work on
>> > ongoing projects for family physician recruitment and addictions and
>> > mental illness recovery projects.&nbsp;
>> >
>> > National
>> > The Borders are opening between Canada and US this week for fully
>> > vaccinated persons.&nbsp;
>> > We also see the toll of the wild fires in British Colombia.
>> > Heartbreaking to see the devastation and deaths from the deadly
>> > fires.&nbsp;
>> >
>> >
>> > Pandemic Update&nbsp;
>> >
>> > Vaccine
>> >
>> > Vaccination for the Covid-19 virus continues to be the main tool we
>> > have to prevent illness and death. If you require assistance to book
>> > your Covid19 vaccine please call my office and my staff can provide
>> > you with some help. Our office phone number is 902-661-2288.&nbsp;
>> >
>> > NS has only 26.1 % of the population with 2nd doses of vaccine while
>> > NB has 39.6% of the population vaccinated with 2nd doses. NB also
>> > vaccinates persons with medical conditions that deems them high risk
>> > but our NS government refuses.&nbsp;
>> >
>> > Nova Scotia&nbsp;
>> >
>> > NS has 53 active cases of Covid19 as of Monday morning with 3 new
>> > cases being identified on Sunday. No one in ICU in the entire province
>> > and only 3 people in hospital.&nbsp;
>> >
>> > https://novascotia.ca/coronavirus/data/
>> >
>> >
>> > New Brunswick&nbsp;
>> >
>> > NB has 21 active cases of Covid-19 as of Monday morning with only 1
>> > new case identified on Sunday. NB has no one in ICU and 4 persons on
>> > hospital with Covid infections.&nbsp;
>> >
>> >
>> https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/8eeb9a2052d641c996dba5de8f25a8aa
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Birthdays
>> >
>> > Monday Ashleigh Coffin and Sheila Rushton
>> > Tuesday Laura Wells
>> > Wednesday Mal MacDonald
>> > Thursday Kittee Baxter and Carl LeBlanc
>> > Friday Chuck MacInnis
>> > Saturday Krista Cormier and Adrian VanVulpen
>> >
>> > Obituaries
>> >
>> > Hermina &quot;Mini&quot; Porter
>> >
>> > https://www.jonesfamilyfuneralcentre.ca/obituaries/154949
>> >
>> >
>> > Margaret Ann Myles
>> >
>> >
>> https://www.arbormemorial.ca/campbells/obituaries/margaret-ann-myles/68221/
>> >
>> > Nova Scotia Starts Here ~ Cumberland&nbsp;
>> >
>> > Several months ago I started this campaign emphasizing the importance
>> > of Cumberland County. Nova Scotia does start in Cumberland. Cumberland
>> > is the Gateway for the Atlantic Cooridor and on average 50 million
>> > dollars worth of goods travel through our Gateway. We may only have 3%
>> > of the population of NS but we provide critical infrastructure for NS,
>> > the Maritimes, Canada and the entire Eastern Seaboard.&nbsp;
>> >
>> > Never underestimate your value as citizens of Cumberland. We are
>> > important and we will stand for our area of the province. It&rsquo;s
>> > time for Cumberland to receive the respect we deserve and we will grow
>> > and become all that we are meant to be.&nbsp;
>> >
>> > Have a great week, take care of yourselves and take care of one
>> > another.&nbsp;
>> >
>> > Take care,&nbsp;
>> > Elizabeth&nbsp;
>> > &nbsp;
>> >
>> > Elizabeth Smith-McCrossin MBA, BScN
>> > Cumberland North MLA&nbsp;
>> >
>> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
>> > Live everyday to the fullest and love as much as humanly possible.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> >>>>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:15:59 -0400
>> >>>>>> Subject: Hey Ralph Goodale perhaps you and the RCMP should call
>> >>>>>> the
>> >>>>>> Yankees Governor Charlie Baker, his lawyer Bob Ross, Rachael
>> >>>>>> Rollins
>> >>>>>> and this cop Robert Ridge (857 259 9083) ASAP EH Mr Primme
>> >>>>>> Minister
>> >>>>>> Trudeau the Younger and Donald Trump Jr?
>> >>>>>> To: pm@pm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
>> >>>>>> Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, djtjr@trumporg.com,
>> >>>>>> Donald.J.Trump@donaldtrump.com, JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca,
>> >>>>>> Frank.McKenna@td.com, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> >>>>>> Douglas.Johnson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> >>>>>> washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> >>>>>> gov.press@state.ma.us, bob.ross@state.ma.us, jfurey@nbpower.com,
>> >>>>>> jfetzer@d.umn.edu, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
>> sfine@globeandmail.com,
>> >>>>>> .Poitras@cbc.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
>> >>>>>> Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, news@kingscorecord.com,
>> >>>>>> news@dailygleaner.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, jbosnitch@gmail.com,
>> >>>>>> andre@jafaust.com>
>> >>>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, DJT@trumporg.com
>> >>>>>> wharrison@nbpower.com, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca,
>> >>>>>> mcu@justice.gc.ca
>> ,
>> >>>>>> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> >>>>>>> From: "Murray, Charles (Ombud)" <Charles.Murray@gnb.ca>
>> >>>>>>> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 18:16:15 +0000
>> >>>>>>> Subject: You wished to speak with me
>> >>>>>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I have the advantage, sir, of having read many of your emails
>> >>>>>>> over
>> >>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>> years.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> As such, I do not think a phone conversation between us, and
>> >>>>>>> specifically one which you might mistakenly assume was in
>> >>>>>>> response
>> >>>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>> your threat of legal action against me, is likely to prove a
>> >>>>>>> productive use of either of our time.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> If there is some specific matter about which you wish to
>> communicate
>> >>>>>>> with me, feel free to email me with the full details and it will
>> >>>>>>> be
>> >>>>>>> given due consideration.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Sincerely,
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Charles Murray
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Ombud NB
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Acting Integrity Commissioner
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>> >>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>> >>>>>>>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova
>> >>>>>>>> Scotia
>> >>>>>>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Mr. Amos,
>> >>>>>>>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy
>> Minister
>> >>>>>>>> of
>> >>>>>>>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>> >>>>>>>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the
>> >>>>>>>> Province
>> >>>>>>>> of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal
>> >>>>>>>> claim
>> >>>>>>>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the
>> >>>>>>>> Attorney
>> >>>>>>>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we
>> >>>>>>>> will
>> >>>>>>>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Department of Justice
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well
>> >>>>>>>>> Please
>> >>>>>>>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
>> >>>>>>>>> ilian.html
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I
>> >>>>>>>>>> must
>> >>>>>>>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING
>> SOMETHING????
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served
>> >>>>>>>>>> upon
>> >>>>>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament
>> >>>>>>>>>> baseball
>> >>>>>>>>>> cards?
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
>> >>>>>>>>>> 6
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> >>>>>>>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> >>>>>>>>>> United States Senate
>> >>>>>>>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> >>>>>>>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> >>>>>>>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a
>> man
>> >>>>>>>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the
>> >>>>>>>>>> matters
>> >>>>>>>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire
>> >>>>>>>>>> tap
>> >>>>>>>>>> tapes.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this
>> >>>>>>>>>> previously.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Very truly yours,
>> >>>>>>>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> >>>>>>>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> >>>>>>>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> >>>>>>>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> >>>>>>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> >>>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>> >>>>>>>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> >>>>>>>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>> >>>>>>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Good Day Sir
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and
>> >>>>>>>>> managed
>> >>>>>>>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the
>> >>>>>>>>> lady
>> >>>>>>>>> who
>> >>>>>>>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after
>> >>>>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>>> Sgt
>> >>>>>>>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal
>> >>>>>>>>> Tanker
>> >>>>>>>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>> >>>>>>>>> suggested that you study closely.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> April 3rd, 2017
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> The only hearing thus far
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> May 24th, 2017
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Date: 20151223
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> BETWEEN:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Plaintiff
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> and
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Defendant
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> ORDER
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick,
>> on
>> >>>>>>>>> December 14, 2015)
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion
>> >>>>>>>>> pursuant
>> >>>>>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on
>> >>>>>>>>> November
>> >>>>>>>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of
>> >>>>>>>>> Claim
>> >>>>>>>>> in its entirety.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my
>> >>>>>>>>> attention
>> >>>>>>>>> a
>> >>>>>>>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my
>> >>>>>>>>> then
>> >>>>>>>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the
>> >>>>>>>>> Canadian
>> >>>>>>>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen
>> >>>>>>>>> Quigg,
>> >>>>>>>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that
>> >>>>>>>>> letter
>> >>>>>>>>> he stated:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you
>> check
>> >>>>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm
>> >>>>>>>>> including
>> >>>>>>>>> you.
>> >>>>>>>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a
>> >>>>>>>>> former
>> >>>>>>>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In
>> >>>>>>>>> addition
>> >>>>>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a
>> >>>>>>>>> number
>> >>>>>>>>> of
>> >>>>>>>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be
>> >>>>>>>>> witnesses
>> >>>>>>>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are
>> >>>>>>>>> known
>> >>>>>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>> >>>>>>>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>> >>>>>>>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba
>> Court
>> >>>>>>>>> of
>> >>>>>>>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob
>> >>>>>>>>> Moore;
>> >>>>>>>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau;
>> >>>>>>>>> former
>> >>>>>>>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former
>> >>>>>>>>> Staff
>> >>>>>>>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick
>> >>>>>>>>> Court
>> >>>>>>>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and,
>> >>>>>>>>> retired
>> >>>>>>>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>> >>>>>>>>> Police.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>> >>>>>>>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with
>> >>>>>>>>> many
>> >>>>>>>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation,
>> >>>>>>>>> I
>> >>>>>>>>> am
>> >>>>>>>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias
>> >>>>>>>>> should
>> >>>>>>>>> I
>> >>>>>>>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment
>> in
>> >>>>>>>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board
>> et
>> >>>>>>>>> al,
>> >>>>>>>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>> >>>>>>>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither
>> >>>>>>>>> party
>> >>>>>>>>> has
>> >>>>>>>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do
>> so.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the
>> >>>>>>>>> Administrator
>> >>>>>>>>> of
>> >>>>>>>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.
>> >>>>>>>>> There
>> >>>>>>>>> is no order as to costs.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>> >>>>>>>>> Judge
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one
>> >>>>>>>>> comment
>> >>>>>>>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I
>> >>>>>>>>> had
>> >>>>>>>>> sent
>> >>>>>>>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the
>> >>>>>>>>> Court
>> >>>>>>>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to
>> >>>>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of
>> >>>>>>>>> my
>> >>>>>>>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest
>> >>>>>>>>> Trudeau
>> >>>>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>>> most
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> >>>>>>>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>> >>>>>>>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>> >>>>>>>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the
>> >>>>>>>>> CROWN
>> >>>>>>>>> in
>> >>>>>>>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you
>> >>>>>>>>> planning
>> >>>>>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust
>> >>>>>>>>> that
>> >>>>>>>>> you
>> >>>>>>>>> dudes are way past too late
>> >>>>>>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me
>> >>>>>>>>> rejoindre
>> >>>>>>>>> à
>> >>>>>>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un
>> >>>>>>>>> courriel
>> >>>>>>>>> à
>> >>>>>>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>> >>>>>>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>> >>>>>>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Merci ,
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in
>> more
>> >>>>>>>>> war
>> >>>>>>>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and
>> >>>>>>>>> reputation
>> >>>>>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times
>> >>>>>>>>> over
>> >>>>>>>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> January 13, 2015
>> >>>>>>>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The
>> >>>>>>>>> Debate
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> December 8, 2014
>> >>>>>>>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>> >>>>>>>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes
>> >>>>>>>>> And
>> >>>>>>>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer
>> >>>>>>>>> hide
>> >>>>>>>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean
>> >>>>>>>>> Chretien
>> >>>>>>>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second
>> >>>>>>>>> campaign
>> >>>>>>>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or
>> >>>>>>>>> contrary
>> >>>>>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>> >>>>>>>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation.
>> >>>>>>>>> There
>> >>>>>>>>> were
>> >>>>>>>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the
>> >>>>>>>>> dearth
>> >>>>>>>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>> >>>>>>>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last
>> >>>>>>>>> minute”
>> >>>>>>>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its
>> >>>>>>>>> mind.
>> >>>>>>>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would
>> not
>> >>>>>>>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>> >>>>>>>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan
>> cousins
>> >>>>>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it
>> was
>> >>>>>>>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq.
>> >>>>>>>>> But
>> >>>>>>>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister
>> >>>>>>>>> Chretien’s
>> >>>>>>>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean
>> Chretien’s
>> >>>>>>>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>> >>>>>>>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI
>> Battle
>> >>>>>>>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>> >>>>>>>>> campaign of 2006.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is
>> >>>>>>>>> that
>> >>>>>>>>> then
>> >>>>>>>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed
>> >>>>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice,
>> >>>>>>>>> consent,
>> >>>>>>>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and
>> >>>>>>>>> babbling
>> >>>>>>>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the
>> >>>>>>>>> deployment
>> >>>>>>>>> of
>> >>>>>>>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by
>> >>>>>>>>> planners
>> >>>>>>>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>> >>>>>>>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins
>> >>>>>>>>> have
>> >>>>>>>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to
>> >>>>>>>>> war.
>> >>>>>>>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian
>> >>>>>>>>> public
>> >>>>>>>>> by
>> >>>>>>>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can
>> >>>>>>>>> do
>> >>>>>>>>> is
>> >>>>>>>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>> >>>>>>>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien
>> >>>>>>>>> Government
>> >>>>>>>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in
>> >>>>>>>>> this
>> >>>>>>>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons
>> >>>>>>>>> regarding
>> a
>> >>>>>>>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the
>> >>>>>>>>> terror
>> >>>>>>>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed
>> >>>>>>>>> state”
>> >>>>>>>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and
>> >>>>>>>>> control,
>> >>>>>>>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world.
>> >>>>>>>>> The
>> >>>>>>>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was
>> >>>>>>>>> vital
>> >>>>>>>>> and
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the
>> actions
>> >>>>>>>>> of
>> >>>>>>>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the
>> >>>>>>>>> CBC
>> >>>>>>>>> have
>> >>>>>>>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is
>> >>>>>>>>> ethical.
>> >>>>>>>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Subject:
>> >>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>> >>>>>>>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>> >>>>>>>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> January 30, 2007
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Mr. David Amos
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of
>> December
>> >>>>>>>>> 29,
>> >>>>>>>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message,
>> >>>>>>>>> I
>> >>>>>>>>> have
>> >>>>>>>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant
>> >>>>>>>>> Commissioner
>> >>>>>>>>> Steve
>> >>>>>>>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Sincerely,
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>> >>>>>>>>> Minister of Health
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> CM/cb
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>> >>>>>>>>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> >>>>>>>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>> >>>>>>>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>> >>>>>>>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>> >>>>>>>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com,
>> >>>>>>>>> riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
>> >>>>>>>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> >>>>>>>>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> >>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>> >>>>>>>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days
>> off
>> >>>>>>>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest
>> >>>>>>>>> assured
>> >>>>>>>>> I
>> >>>>>>>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your
>> >>>>>>>>> concerns.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our
>> >>>>>>>>> position
>> >>>>>>>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not
>> process
>> >>>>>>>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to
>> >>>>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide
>> these
>> >>>>>>>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in
>> >>>>>>>>> this
>> >>>>>>>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be
>> done.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>> >>>>>>>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is
>> clear
>> >>>>>>>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in
>> Canada
>> >>>>>>>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>> >>>>>>>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we
>> >>>>>>>>> had
>> >>>>>>>>> on
>> >>>>>>>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future
>> >>>>>>>>> endeavors.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>  Sincerely,
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>> >>>>>>>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>> >>>>>>>>> Traffic Services NCO
>> >>>>>>>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>> >>>>>>>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>> >>>>>>>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> >>>>>>>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>> >>>>>>>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>> >>>>>>>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>> >>>>>>>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>> >>>>>>>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>> >>>>>>>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> >>...

[Message clipped]  View entire message

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
at

No comments:

Post a Comment