Université de Moncton to appoint officials to study potential name change
University announced Saturday it will ask 2 officials to prepare report
This announcement came after the university's board of governors met Saturday afternoon. The decision is in response to calls for change from some Acadian groups.
According to the university, the officials will be asked to examine various aspects of changing the name and the potential impacts of a change.
"A decision as critical as whether or not to change the name of the university requires a rigorous process," said Denise Frenette, vice-chair of the university's board of governors.
"That is why board members need more information and evidence to make an informed decision. We will leave it to the officials to carry out their mandate with all the independence required."
Speaking in French, Frenette also said the university's executive would propose candidates for the two positions. The board of governors will make the selections.
A report examining the political, social, legal and economic aspect of changing the university's name is expected by October.
Some Acadian groups renewed calls for the university to be renamed as the school celebrates its 60th anniversary this year.
Denis Prud'homme is seen speaking to the select committee on public universities on March 1. (Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick)
Denis Prud'homme, the president and vice-chancellor of the university, said last month the university is open to a name change if public interest calls for it.
In response, a petition was signed by approximately 850 people supporting a change, including former New Brunswick ombud Bernard Richard, MLAs such as Kevin Arseneau and Robert Gauvin, and other political and cultural figures.
Meanwhile, several prominent Acadians in the province wrote an open letter in a New Brunswick French-language newspaper, calling themselves a silent majority who oppose a name change. They included Canadian public policy expert Donald J. Savoie, former New Brunswick deputy premier Aldéa Landry, and former Supreme Court of Canada justice Michel Bastarache.
The university and the city take their name from Robert Monckton, an 18th-century British military figure who was involved in the deportation of Acadians.
The issue of whether to rename the university goes back to its incorporation in 1963.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
With files from Radio-Canada
I know some people will want things to be frozen in time because they can’t cope with change, though.
Regardless, seems like a silly waste of time and effort, but to each their own.
Of that I have no doubt
How far back are we going to go to make sure everyone is included?... or would you like to impose a limit?
Reply to danny rugg
Check out who the Dean of their Law School is
Reply to Derek James
universite de don't come for the nursing degree
Reply to Toby Tolly
judgment and neither party is blameless. It happened. both were at fault and it is past time that we move on.
Afterwards they were asked to take an oath of allegiance to England, which they refused.
No one is 100% innocent in this.
https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/the-deportation-of-the-acadians-featureIn much the same way that we wouldn't know who won the last election if no one reported on it.... is there a point to your post?
I'd be all for renaming it to Université de Saint-Joseph, thus preserving history.
Ontario acquired its name from the Iroquois word “kanadario”, which translates into “sparkling” water.
The name is believed to have originated with Cree term "Man-into-wahpaow", meaning “the narrows of the Great Spirit”
...check out Origin of the names of Canada and its provinces and territories
New Brunswick was founded in 1784, and its present territory was carved out of Nova Scotia by a royal commission appointed by George III. New Brunswick was named for the German county of Brunswick, a duchy of King George III.
The official seal of the newly established province symbolized shipbuilding, showing a ship between two riverbanks flanked by large Canadian white pines. It resembled the British coat of arms and bore the Latin motto Spem Reduxit, meaning "hope restored." That seal remained in use until Confederation in 1867 and has since been reworked several times.
The founding of the Province of New Brunswick in 1784 coincided with the massive inflow of New England Loyalists intent on maintaining allegiance to the British Crown during the American War of Independence (1775-1783). Thousands of Loyalists arrived with their families and wanted to settle here, despite the trying conditions. The British king acquiesced by founding a new province. New Brunswick's motto refers to that hopeful arrival. While many Loyalists were soldiers and officers, their ranks also included farmers, lawyers, merchants,shipbuilders, and so on. They settled mostly in the south of the province, including the regions of St. Andrews, Saint John, Gagetown, and Fredericton.
The Loyalists worked to fashion New Brunswick through their energetic participation in establishing the provincial government and its constituent bodies. They also founded teaching institutions, including King's College, which later became the University of New Brunswick. The Acadians, who were already settled in several parts of the province, were allowed no role in organizing the new province.
You saying this:
"Acadia was a colony..."
Poilievre's pitch to defund CBC, keep French services would require change in law
Proposal 'a lot more complicated than people think,' expert says
Stephanie Taylor · The Canadian Press · Posted: Apr 14, 2023 10:49 AM ADT
Saying that the Acadians were not neutral implies that there was a reason they got deported, that it was justified.
You’re the one who shared something that was culturally insensitive. Apparently, asking questions is attacking someone. Who knew?
This wasn't something that happened out of the blue, there were actions that lead up to this. Putting 100% of the blame on one single person, while ignoring the actions of everyone else is intellectually dishonest.
"You replying that the Acadians were not neutral implies that there was reason for what happened. That it somehow was justified. "
Let me get this straight, your take away from this is:
Being hostile is OK when the objectives of those hostilities fail to materialize?
...what if it had succeeded?
"Why else would you have shared that?"
...because it was the reason for the deportation.
The people calling for the name change?
"Those who do not study history are doomed to repeat it"
Poilievre's pitch to defund CBC, keep French services would require change in law
Proposal 'a lot more complicated than people think,' expert says
That's according to the Crown corporation, which has found itself in a back-and-forth with the Opposition leader over his pledge to cut the roughly $1 billion in taxpayer dollars it receives annually.
Past Conservative leaders have also taken aim at the CBC, which receives its share of public money through Parliament when MPs vote on its federal budget.
Poilievre's pitch to strip the CBC of its public funding is widely popular among Conservatives and earned loud cheers from the crowds who packed rooms to see him during last year's leadership campaign.
But he has also suggested he supports Radio-Canada's French services.
When asked for comment on how he reconciles those two things, his office pointed to a media interview he gave to Radio-Canada in March 2022, in which he suggested maintaining support for services tailored to francophone minorities.
In another sit-down interview last July with True North, Poilievre explained that the only justification for having a public broadcaster is to provide content the private market does not. He argued that is not the case for CBC's English services.
"Almost everything the CBC does can be done in the marketplace these days because of technology," he told host Andrew Lawton. "I would preserve a small amount for French-language minorities, linguistic minorities, because they, frankly, will not get news services provided by the market."
He added he did not think the CBC's English-language services on TV or online "provide anything that people can't get from the marketplace."
Making that happen, however, appears easier said than done.
CBC responds to defunding pledge
In a statement, CBC/Radio-Canada said funding only Radio-Canada "would change the very nature of how programs and services are funded in Canada to target public money at only one language group."
A spokesman said doing so would require the Broadcasting Act, the law outlining its mandate, "to be rewritten."
The law requires the corporation to provide programming in both French and English, and it does not give the government sway over how resources are allocated to accomplish that.
It also stipulates that the broadcaster maintain "creative and programming independence" and provide a range of both television and radio services.
"CBC/Radio-Canada is the country's only media company that serves all Canadians, in both official languages (and eight Indigenous ones), from coast to coast to coast," corporate spokesman Leon Mar said in a written statement.
It is the corporation's board of directors that determines how the funding it receives is spent. In 2021-22, the CBC received more than $1.2 billion in government funding, a decrease from about $1.4 billion in 2020-21.
Peter Menzies, a senior fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute and former vice-chair of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, said reducing funding for the CBC is one thing, but prescribing how it can use the money would be difficult "unless you redo the legislation entirely."
People
walk into the CBC building in Toronto on April 4, 2012. Conservative
Leader Pierre Poilievre has said that his government will sell off CBC
buildings. (Nathan Denette/Canadian Press)
He said a future government could provide the broadcaster with a new mandate specifying what kind of services and on what platforms and in what languages it provides them — but said that leads to the problem of "picking winners and losers."
"I'm not sure politicians really want to go down the [road of] ... 'We are going to give francophones better service with public money than we're going to give anglophones,"' he said.
Menzies added that while he believes changes should be made to the CBC, "it's a lot more complicated than people think."
"Preferring one piece of it over another piece, particularly linguistically, I think that opens a door you probably don't really want to open."
Accusations of bias
He also pointed out about 40 per cent of CBC's revenue already flows to Radio-Canada, even though the proportion of French-speaking households in Canada is much smaller.
Poilievre touts that slashing CBC's overall funding would equal savings for taxpayers, and has also suggested he has plans to sell off its buildings.
Speaking to a crowd gathered in Calgary last August, the then-leadership hopeful accused the corporation of putting "all the money into these big, gigantic temples they call headquarters in Toronto and Montreal." Montreal is the home of its Radio-Canada headquarters.
"There's some savings right there," he added.
In a statement Thursday, Bloc Quebecois Leader Yves-Francois Blanchet said Poilievre's proposal caters to the most devoted parts of his base and that Radio-Canada serves an essential role for Quebec and the French language in Canada. He accused the Tory leader of wanting to hamper those efforts.
A spokeswoman for Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez, Laura Scaffidi, added that both CBC and Radio-Canada are invaluable "in smaller and official language minority communities."
While visiting Edmonton on Thursday, Poilievre was asked whether he was prepared to amend the federal broadcasting law as it pertains to the CBC and its French-language services. He did not answer, but instead called the CBC the "biased propaganda arm of the Liberal Party."
Relations
between the federal Conservatives and the CBC further soured earlier
this year when Catherine Tait, the broadcaster's CEO, told the Globe and
Mail in an interview that Poilievre's criticisms amounted to a slogan
the party used to raise money. (Chris Wattie/Reuters)
It comes after he asked Twitter to add a "government-funded" label to accounts that promote "news-related" content from CBC English, but did not ask the same for its French counterpart.
The corporation contends that the description is inaccurate, saying its editorial independence is enshrined in law. It also draws a distinction between "government" and "public" funding, because of the fact that the money it receives is granted through a vote made in Parliament.
After such a label was applied to the BBC, the U.K. broadcaster pushed back, and Twitter eventually changed the tag to "publicly funded media."
CBC CEO reached out to Poilievre
Relations between the federal Conservatives and the CBC further soured earlier this year when Catherine Tait, the broadcaster's CEO, told the Globe and Mail in an interview that Poilievre's criticisms of the CBC amounted to a slogan the Conservative Party used to raise money.
That is just what the party did following her comments. Poilievre said Tait's words showed CBC had launched a partisan attack against him and that it could not be trusted.
The exchange followed an invitation Tait had made to Poilievre to meet just days after he was elected Conservative leader last September. By the end of November, Tait reached out again, expressing disappointment in a response she said she received back from his office that he would not be able to meet — despite the party continuing to attack CBC and its reporters as biased.
"These fundraising efforts do not acknowledge the scope and value that CBC/Radio-Canada actually delivers to Canadians, or the implications to this country and its economy were it to be 'defunded,"' Tait wrote in a letter to Poilievre.
La Presse first reported on the letter, which it obtained with an access-to-information request. The Canadian Press also obtained a copy.
"As the head of the public broadcaster and as the leader of the Opposition," Tait continued, "I think Canadians can rightly expect that the two of us have a responsibility to discuss the implications of your promise."
With files from Mickey Djuric and Ritika Dubey
No comments:
Post a Comment