Wednesday, 12 July 2023

Bank of Canada raises its key interest rate to 5%

 

Bank of Canada wary of signs of a turning point in economy, as it hikes key interest rate again

But Tiff Macklem sees rates staying high even as prices stabilize and economy retreats

Wednesday's Monetary Policy Report from the Bank of Canada offered a similar lesson, as the central bank once again warned that the poor and over-borrowed were likely to suffer more from both high inflation and the high borrowing rates needed to bring down stubborn inflation.

While he admitted that the latest quarter-point hike in its key rate to five per cent would hurt many people, Bank of Canada governor Tiff Macklem warned that he remained wary of overshoot — with the possibility that the lagging effects of a long series of interest rate hikes could kick in suddenly and put the economy into reverse.

Unnecessary pain?

"We're trying to balance the risks of under- and over-tightening," Macklem said in answer to a reporter's question at Wednesday's news conference in Ottawa. "If we do more than we need now, it's going to be unnecessarily painful."

Asked repeatedly by reporters why a string of 10 interest rate hikes had not had a stronger impact on inflation, including food and house prices, Macklem and senior deputy governor Carolyn Rogers cited a number of effects, including a housing shortage, a strong labour market and the post-pandemic surge in immigration that recently sent Canada's population to the 40-million mark.

But the other thing that may be "buffering" the effects of higher rates are forces similar to the K-shaped recovery that we saw after the COVID-19 pandemic meltdown. Just as we've seen in recent climate disasters, not everyone is affected the same.

A fan holds up a K sign from his balcony after St. Louis Cardinals starting pitcher Adam Wainwright (not pictured) struck out Milwaukee Brewers center fielder Avisail Garcia (not pictured) during the third inning at Busch Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Jeff Curry-USA TODAY Sports Following the COVID-19 pandemic, some economists predicted there would be a K-shaped recovery, as richer people bounced back and poorer people did not. Now there are signs of a split in the Canadian economy between those with savings and those without. (Jeff Curry/Reuters)

"We deal in a lot of aggregate numbers and averages, but we know that inflation and interest rates affect people very differently," Rogers said. "In particular, we know ... that the most vulnerable Canadians are the ones that are hurt most both by inflation and by higher interest rates."

While news stories quite fairly focus on the plight of the worst off, a majority of Canadians remain in financial good shape, she said. And those better-off Canadians are able to keep spending even as prices rise.

"There are two things that are helping buffer many households from both inflation and interest rates, and that is the savings they accumulated over the course of the pandemic. You can see three-quarters of households have accumulated quite a bit more savings than they had prior to the  pandemic," Rogers said, citing the Monetary Policy Report (MPR), which contains many interesting graphs and charts.

"The other thing we think is supporting confidence and buffering Canadians from some of the impacts is the strong labour market," she said, adding that people are not afraid of losing their jobs.

Central banks have been wrong

While Macklem and Rogers emphasized the view that we are heading to a slow and smooth soft landing without heading to recession, an MPR outlook is never complete without a mention of the downside risks.

"It's ridiculous to think that a quarter-point rate hike [on Wednesday] would make the difference between starting a recession and avoiding recession," longtime Edmonton financial analyst and author Hilliard MacBeth wrote in a social media post this week.

But of course there are many examples of what we might call the last straw effect, when a final increase in rates or the final rise in global temperatures can lead to a cascade of consequences. The impossible thing to know in advance is when the moment is reached. Certainly both the Bank of Canada and the U.S. Federal Reserve have gotten sudden changes wrong in the past.

Many economists have suggested that central banks around the world have gone too far, too fast in hiking rates and that the well-known lagging effect of previous sharp rate hikes could come all at once.

WATCH | Bank of Canada hikes rate again and isn't ruling out more increases:

Bank of Canada raises interest rate to 5% and doesn't rule out more hikes

Duration 2:07
The Bank of Canada has raised its benchmark interest rate to 5 per cent, saying inflation and excess demand remain stubbornly high. Many Canadians with mortgages are feeling the pain, with some paying double what they did just a few years ago.

Canadian author Malcolm Gladwell wrote a whole book about the concept in The Tipping Point, "that magic moment when an idea, trend or social behaviour crosses a threshold, tips, and spreads like wildfire."

In the climate context, that wording might be disquieting in a year when the hectares burned in Canadian wildfires hit a new "magic moment".

In the Canadian economy, there are a number of negative indicators that could come together to cross a threshold.

Hints of a June slowdown in home sales could be confirmed in Friday's latest real estate data. A sharp fall in U.S. inflation on Wednesday, new rules to cut risk on mortgage extensions and this week's announced decline in sales at Aritzia are potential signs that the economy may be reaching a turning point.

Growing signs of a slowdown

"Increased missed payments on products like credit cards and auto loans are a concern," Rebecca Oakes, vice-president of advanced analytics at Equifax Canada, said in a release of new data last month.

The average interest rate that mortgage holders are paying is still well below what you'd pay if you had to renew now. As each person's renewal comes due, they will have to take money from their consumer spending to debt repayment.

"The impact of the rate hikes were felt in markets (especially bonds) in real time, but the real economy is only just starting to feel the real effects of the tightening of the credit channel," Cullen Roche, a well-known U.S. money manager, said in a social media post.

This week, inflation in China — a country blamed for contributing to global price hikes due to its pandemic industrial shutdowns — fell to zero, with producer prices actually shrinking.

Former Bank of Canada governor Stephen Poloz used to say he had to steer by looking in the rearview mirror.

On Wednesday the current governor said while there may still be more rate hikes ahead and little chance of interest rate cuts, he'll watch the economy meeting by meeting in order to be ready for the unexpected.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Don Pittis

Business columnist

Based in Toronto, Don Pittis is a business columnist and senior producer for CBC News. Previously, he was a forest firefighter, and a ranger in Canada's High Arctic islands. After moving into journalism, he was principal business reporter for Radio Television Hong Kong before the handover to China. He has produced and reported for the CBC in Saskatchewan and Toronto and the BBC in London.

 
 
 
2864 Comments
 
 
 
fred green

It's about time we reassess the existence of the central banks.

1. Since there existence their claim was to back stop banks. This is not the same as intervening in the market. The current problems are a continuation of 2008 crisis which was the result of the last 50 years of money devaluation policy. The money system has become more unstable because of their centralized policies.

2. They are an unelected invalid issuer of money. They agenda they are pushing through the use of economic policy on people, contradicts the goals of the charter and freedoms. The impoverishment through money devaluation, and funding of credit to the government, results in ever increasing power of the state over the people.
 

Zach weyrauch.
Reply to fred green
You're close you just gotta stop believing the corporate myth of 'big government'.

The state isnt wielding the most power in our society right now, corporations are. That's why our government is in a standoff with two corporations right now over news media.
 
 
Larry McCarthy

Reply to fred green
"Where did you learn those gems Fred?"
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Larry McCarthy
When will you learn?
 
 
Larry McCarthy
Reply to David Amos
I already have and it's not the drivel Fred posted.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Larry McCarthy
Drivel?
 
 
fred green
Reply to Zach weyrauch.
Sounds like other tyrants telling other's what they can believe
 
 
Larry McCarthy
Reply to David Amos
Since you have "learned", enlighten us!
 
 
Larry McCarthy
Reply to fred green
At least believe something that's factual Fred.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Larry McCarthy
I did in 2002 when I sued 3 US Treasury Agents Remember?
 
 
Larry McCarthy
Reply to David Amos
I don't do mind games David! 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Larry McCarthy
Nor I
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Larry McCarthy
Where did your first "Gem" go?  
 
 
Larry McCarthy
Reply to David Amos
Still trying David? You are too obvious!!!  
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Larry McCarthy
Its your malice that went "Poof" Correct?    
 
 
Larry McCarthy
Reply to David Amos
You f-lagging? 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Larry McCarthy
Nope Perhaps you should research people before you insult them?  
 
 
Larry McCarthy
Reply to David Amos 
Perhaps you should research people before you insult them! 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Larry McCarthy
I always do 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to fred green
The fact is I already blogged and tweeted about this thread 
 
 
fred green 
Reply to fred green
according to whom? 




 
Luc Newsome  
As mentioned elsewhere…..” Canadian households are more in debt than those in any other G7 country, and the amount they owe is now more than the value of the country's entire economy.”

But hey keep spending
 

Iain Basedord
Reply to Luc Newsome  
More likely to keep borrowing.
 
 
Scott Bullerwell
Reply to Luc Newsome
C
anadians are just following Justin's advice, I guess: The budget will balance itself.
 

Larry McCarthy.
Reply to Scott Bullerwell
Canadians are sheep?
 

David Railton.
Reply to Larry McCarthy
all but thee of course
 
 
Larry McCarthy
Reply to David Railton
I had no idea I'm the only one who takes responsibility for my financial decisions!
 
 
David Railton.
Reply to Larry McCarthy
no you are the only one that is not a sheep - a lofty and inspiring position were either to be true
 
 
Larry McCarthy
Reply to David Railton
Nothing lofty about taking responsibility for personal debt.
 
 
David Railton.
Reply to Larry McCarthy
as you said Canadians are sheep thereby indicating that you and you alone are not - lofty indeed
 
 
Larry McCarthy
Reply to David Railton
I asked Scott if they are David. Don't twist my words.
 
 
David Railton.
Reply to Larry McCarthy 
not twisting anything , this is your exact quote with nothing left out - "

Canadians are sheep? "
 
 
Larry McCarthy
Reply to David Railton 
Which is a question. Don't play mind games.
 
 
David Railton.
Reply to Larry McCarthy 
we both know that placing a question mark after a statement does not necessarily make it a question
 
 
Larry McCarthy
Reply to David Railton 
Nope, only you are making that statement. Take your mind games elsewhere.
 
 
David Railton.
Reply to Larry McCarthy 
not a mind game Larry and we both know it
 
 
Larry McCarthy
Reply to David Railton
It is, and we both know it. You're much too obvious. Ciao.
 

David Railton.
Reply to Larry McCarthy
yes I am
 

Larry McCarthy
Reply to David Railton
You're parading your desperation! Too funny!
 
 
David Railton.
Reply to Larry McCarthy
to a crowd of one  




 
James Minion
Mortgage frau d happened on a grand scale

-people put in fake T4 slips and income levels on mortgage applications and banks didn’t verify so stress test was avoided and people borrowed way more than they can afford

-Investors bought eg 50 properties and put down it was their First RE purchase on each mortgage application so the investor only put 5% down payment instead of the 25% down payment they needed for investment properties. Banks and bank employees wanted the business and the mortgages are CMHC insured

 
Larry McCarthy
Reply to James Minion
Any evidence for that, Minion?
 
 
James Minion
Reply to Larry McCarthy
There’s plenty of stories out there from insiders but banks and government keeping it hidden from general media

It’s like the US in 07, people didn’t find out what was happening to years later as the truth leaked out and economy got way worse in 08-11
 
 
Larry McCarthy
content deactivated
Reply to James Minion
 
 
James Minion
Reply to Larry McCarthy
Just been chatting with bank financial advisors and mortgage brokerages that deal with dozens of clients a day. Ask them the right questions and you’ll find out a lot.

Though you need to know how to step back and put all the pieces together and that’s the part the average Joe can’t do
 
 
Henri Bianchi.
Reply to James Minion
Failure to carry out due diligence voids the mortgage insurance which is why most banks will terminate employees who are caught fudging the mortgage application.
 
 
James Minion
Reply to Henri Bianchi.
most banks giving employees with high mortgage sales higher commission and bonuses. So some employees let anyone apply and get accepted on Canadian mortgage applications
 
 
Larry McCarthy
Reply to James Minion
So, you're not the "average Joe", just an Alcan hat wearer?
 
 
Larry McCarthy
Reply to James Minion
Odd, you did say, "Mortgage frau d happened on a grand scale" !!!!
 
 
James Minion
Reply to Larry McCarthy
I’ve analyzed the full picture but if I try to post detail with links, graphs, charts, etc the comments get DC so not with the time here
 
 
James Minion
Reply to Larry McCarthy
I’ve seen evidence and even the W5 video from about 6 months ago is one of thousands and thousands of cases
 
 
Larry McCarthy
Reply to James Minion
Is your info. from the US? It was quite common there before '08. Bank employees were deliberately fudging applications and we know what happened.
 
 
Larry McCarthy
Reply to James Minion
You love to exaggerate!
 
 
James Minion
Reply to Larry McCarthy
Therefore if in the last 5 years Canada copied the US mistakes from 02-07 then you know what the coming months bring!

Just prepare for it!
 
 
Larry McCarthy
Reply to James Minion
Canada has much tighter bank regulation than the US. It's why we didn't face what the US did back then.
 
 
James Minion
Reply to Larry McCarthy
Harper did a go job stopping it before it got out of hand. If a year more had gone by, Canada would have been just as bad as the US in 08 at the time

Now Canada has much looser bank regulations than the US in 02-07 so now it’s Canadians turn to experience the US’s version of 08-11 in upcoming next few years
 
 
Larry McCarthy
Reply to James Minion
The tight regulations were there long before Harper! He had nothing to do with saving us from the US situation.
 
 
James Minion
Reply to Larry McCarthy
He bailed out the banks is about $150 Billion to save them from crashing

Justin will do the same in next few years but where does he get the $ from after spending so much on covid and giving it to foreign countries and foreign buyers?
 
 
Larry McCarthy
Reply to James Minion
Where di you get that number? BTW, it was not a bailout. You really should read "before" posting!
 
 
James Minion
Reply to Larry McCarthy
It was cash given to prevent a crises at the time after seeing what just happened to US banks in 08. Without that $ the Canadian banks might not have survived those years

Though this time over $1 T is probably needed to save Canadian banks in next two years from a much worse situation
 
 
Larry McCarthy
Reply to James Minion
"We are not going in and buying bad assets. What we're doing is simply exchanging assets that we already hold the insurance on and the reason we're doing this is to get out in front. The issue here is not protecting the banks," Mr. Harper said. 
 
 
 
 
 

Bank of Canada raises its key interest rate to 5%

10th rate hike by central bank since March 2022

The move was expected by economists after Statistics Canada released its June labour force survey last week showing that Canada added 60,000 jobs last month — further contributing to an overheated economy.

Some of the country's biggest lenders, including the Royal Bank of Canada, CIBC, Bank of Montreal and TD Bank, have already announced that they will match their increase effective Thursday to align with that of the central bank's.

Following the announcement, experts diverged on whether Canadians could expect another increase after the summer. Trading in investments known as swaps — which bet on future central bank moves — imply there is a better than 75 per cent chance of another small hike at the bank's next meeting on Sept. 6.

The effects of interest rate hikes can sometimes take a year or a year-and-a-half to play out in the economy.

"There's an element of patience, and I think that's why as well you see [the bank] being as noncommittal as they were today, with respect to whether they will be performing more hikes," Desjardins chief economist Jimmy Jean told CBC News in an interview.

"They're trying their best to communicate something to Canadians that can provide them with some sense of clarity. But the problem is that they don't have that clarity themselves."

Could be mid-2025 before bank hits inflation target

Wednesday's rate hike marks the 10th by the central bank since March 2022. It hit pause on those hikes in January for a few months to determine whether the economy had sufficiently cooled, then resumed its campaign in June.

"Global inflation is easing, with lower energy prices and a decline in goods price inflation. However, robust demand and tight labour markets are causing persistent inflationary pressures in services," the bank wrote in a release.

WATCH | 'Monetary policy is working': 

Interest rates are up again: What's the Bank of Canada saying?

Duration 1:31
Bank of Canada governor Tiff Macklem says 'monetary policy is working — but underlying inflationary pressures are proving more stubborn.'

During a mid-morning news conference on Wednesday, Bank of Canada governor Tiff Macklem said the bank expects inflation to ease but that it could take until the middle of 2025 to hit its two per cent target.

That's six months later than was forecast in April.

"We've been clear about the indicators we are watching, and it's clearly too early to be talking about interest rate cuts," Macklem said, adding it's also too soon to tell how much impact the rate increases are having.

"We are certainly trying to balance the risks of over- and under-tightening, and we'll be taking it one meeting at a time."


The bank's Monetary Policy Report noted that the bank would raise its rates because of persistent "excess demand."

Canada's population surpassed 40 million people last month and is growing at its highest annual rate since 1957. Population growth is a key factor contributing to job growth, consumer spending on goods and services, and housing demand. 

The inflation rate slowed to 3.4 per cent in the year up to May, down from 8.1 per cent last summer, as the central bank's efforts to rein in the number paid off. But rising food prices were still outpacing inflation — an ongoing trend since late 2021.

'I've thought about selling'

With Wednesday's rate hike, a typical mortgage holder can expect to pay more on their variable rate loan, starting on Thursday.

A homeowner with a $500,000, 25-year variable rate loan at a rate of 5.8 per cent on Tuesday would have been paying $2,512 a month. After Wednesday's hike, their rate is likely to jump to 6.05 per cent, which will bump their monthly payment up to $2,571 a month. That's an increase of more than $700 a year.

Exact numbers will depend on the specifics of the loan, but on average, mortgage analytics site RateHub.ca says mortgage holders can expect to pay $100 more per month on their mortgage after Wednesday's hike.

Leena Chandi, a single mother of three who purchased her Surrey, B.C., townhouse seven years ago, said she would lay down and cry if another hike were announced, as it was on Wednesday.

A woman stands in front of a black and white photo with three women in it. Leena Chandi, a single mother of three, purchased her Surrey, B.C., townhouse seven years ago. She's watched her variable mortgage rate double since the Bank of Canada began its aggressive campaign to cool inflation. (Martin Diotte/CBC)

Having started on a fixed mortgage, she switched to a new bank and took on a variable rate about a year-and-a-half ago — before the Bank of Canada began its quest to tame an overheated economy with a series of interest rate hikes.

"All of a sudden, boom. The first increase happened and I was like, 'OK, well, whatever, you know, that's fine, I can handle it," Chandi told CBC News.

"And then the second increase happened and then the third increase happened, and then the fourth and then the fifth, and now my mortgage payment is doubled."

WATCH | Canadians say they're feeling the squeeze of rate hikes: 

British Columbians say they're feeling squeezed as interest rate hiked again

Duration 0:46
The Bank of Canada has raised its benchmark interest rate for the 10th time since March 2022, increasing pressure on homeowners with variable mortgages and those looking to enter the housing market.

Chandi said her biweekly payments increased from $800 to $1,300 during that period.

"I've thought about selling. I really have because ... my townhouse is now probably worth three times, almost 2½ times what I paid for it. But where am I gonna go?"

Mortgage rates driving inflation

Clément Bonnal, a Quebec City resident who bought his house in 2021, said his mortgage payments have increased by almost $700 per month. 

He said that a rate hike by the Bank of Canada is "nonsense" to him, as rising mortgage costs are now driving inflation, having climbed by 30 per cent in Statistics Canada data from June.

Bonnal questioned why the bank would continue to raise interest rates when inflation is close to its target range — and given that the impact of rate hikes can sometimes take more than a year to appear in the economy.

"If they continue to increase the rates, it's like a fireman that puts the fire in the forest," Bonnal told CBC News.

Carolyn Rogers, senior deputy governor of the Bank of Canada, said during the Wednesday news conference that while housing is sensitive to interest rates, housing demand is still outweighing supply and driving up prices.

"We target inflation," she said. "We don't target house prices, and we don't target any one sector or one item within the [consumer price index] basket."

WATCH | 'We don't target house prices': 

Bank of Canada: 'We target inflation, we don't target house prices'

Duration 1:07
Carolyn Rogers, senior deputy Bank of Canada governor, says that while house prices are 'very sensitive' to interest rates, there are other issues to consider as well — including supply issues and increasing immigration levels.

For Chandi, the mother of three in B.C., it's cold comfort as she considers the price of groceries and clothes, on top of paying her university-aged daughter's rent and contributing to her children's RESPs.

"Do they actually realize how much of an effect this is having on the average person?" she said.

"It just seems like we have no say. We're just at the mercy of the Bank of Canada right now."

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Jenna Benchetrit is a web and radio journalist for CBC News. She works primarily with the entertainment team and occasionally covers business and general assignment stories. A Montrealer based in Toronto, Jenna holds a master's degree in journalism from Toronto Metropolitan University. You can reach her at jenna.benchetrit@cbc.ca.

With files from Pete Evans and Phillippe de Montigny

 
 
 
6033 Comments

 
 
David Amos
I wonder if anyone listened to Bruce Sellery the CEO of Credit Canada talking about this on CBC today
 
 
David Amos
Reply to David Amos
How about these dudes?

"Trudeau acknowledged the bank's decision isn't what many Canadians want to hear. But he framed the issue as a global one that's not unique to Canada.

"I've had conversations with leaders here in Europe and around the world and the cost of living is a real challenge," he said. "People around the world are facing significant challenges."

Trudeau said his government is "stepping up with targeted support for people who most need it at this moment." He pointed to the government's GST rebate — which has been branded politically as a "grocery rebate" — as one of those measures.

Poilievre said a government led by him would "axe the carbon tax" and rein in government spending as part of a push to get inflation under control."

 
 

David Kingston
Maybe people should just work more.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to David Kingston
Surely you jest 
 
 
Jason Leonard 
Reply to David Kingston.
Or find other ways to not pay tax. 
  
 
 
 
Sara Shepard
Since corporations like the food companies are making record profits while their prices keep increasing, is charging them a short-term windfall tax ever considered? I know shareholders won't like it and they'll probably just charge even more to offset the tax but why are only people with variable mortgages and long-term lines of credit the ONLY ones who bear the brunt of higher interest rates and inflation?
 
 
Luc Gervis
Reply to Sara Shepard
We ....Must.....Punish....everyone
 
 
Andy Shilkenberg
Reply to Sara Shepard
Loblaws balance sheet shows $8.5 Billion in debt
 
 
David Kingston
Reply to Sara Shepard
Variable rate mortgages and long term LOCs borrowed money, that's why they pay for the interest
 
 
Robert Tyre
Reply to Sara Shepard
Many countries in Europe and the UK have wind fall taxes. They however are not banana republics
 
 
Luc Newsome
Reply to Sara Shepard
Tax is the only solution some governments know
 
 
Robert Tyre
Reply to Andy Shilkenberg
Nothing a good “restructuring” and a whole whack of tax deductible write downs won’t solve
 
 
Andy Shilkenberg
Reply to Robert Tyre
Interest is tax deductible as it is an expense, but maybe provide an example of how what you are proposing helps them avoid paying principle and interest?
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Luc Newsome
Oh so true
 
 
Troy Bodi
Reply to Andy Shilkenberg
And how much profit? Net worth?
 
 
Andy Shilkenberg
Reply to Troy Bodi
The comment was about the brunt of interest rates, don't know what profit and net worth have to do with that.
 
 
Troy Bodi
Reply to Andy Shilkenberg
Loblaws can afford the debt. They might even be doing it strategically. 5% interest is fine if they can get the equivalent of 6 out of the customer. Vs average Joe that just wants to buy a house.
 
 
Andy Shilkenberg
Reply to Troy Bodi
Because someone can afford something, then they owe? I paid 5% + when I bought my house; who owes me?\
 
 
Sara Shepard
Reply to David Kingston
Yes, but corporations artificially increasing prices to increase profit - e.g the 16-year bread price fixing scandal and 'greedflation' post supply-chain pandemic issues - are gouging the same people who took v.r. mortgages and, granted, they didn't have the foresight to know borrowing at historically low interest rates/free money for so long had to end sometime but they also couldn't have predicted 10 rate increases in 14 months.
 
 


Jessie MacDonald
Content Deactivated
The Trudeau apologists are here.

But but but........insert today's talking point. It's nothing to do with the consequences of 8 years of policy decisions.

They're here all day long 365 days.

Real tax payers they are.

 
Paul Rodriguez
Reply to Jessie MacDonald  
and there go to, best in the g7 for one thing or another.
 
 
Andy Wall
Reply to Jessie MacDonald   
Interest rates are going up in every country on the planet. Is that Trudeau’s fault as well?
 
 
Arron Wheatly
Reply to Paul Rodriguez
......for failed policies. 
 
 
Darren MacDonald
Reply to Andy Wall 
If you talk to Tiff, yes
 
 
Arron Wheatly
Reply to Andy Wall
Those country's "leaders" did the same silly thing. That is why. Go look at their central bank's balance sheet.
 
 
John Decarted
Reply to Arron Wheatly 
you hinted at it. leaders are irrelevant, central banks run the show
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Jessie MacDonald  
Welcome to the circus
 
 
Steve Brockhouse
Reply to Jessie MacDonald 
There is an implication that apology may be necessary for some action (or lack of it).

Whereas, in fact none is necessary.

So it is not clear to whom the comment is being addressed.
 
 
 
 

Luc Newsome
CBC missed this one…

“Gap between high and low income Canadian households widening at record pace: StatCan”
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Luc Newsome
Go Figure 
 
 
Darren MacDonald
Reply to Luc Newsome
It was just an oversight like CF's "fiscal anchors"
 
 
Arron Wheatly
Reply to Luc Newsome
......on purpose. Just like they miss the labour force participation rate at 65% or doubling the money supply since 2015.
 
 
 

David Green
What’s happening with housing and interest rates plus the high cost of everything is the result of the last 8years. There is no easy fix to it either just a lot of financial pain ahead, but could we please stop making it worse with more spending announcements every week.
 
 
Arron Wheatly
Reply to David Green
Doubling the money supply has dire effects. It's not like this hasn't been done before.

Some can not be reached or are incapable of learning from history.
 
 
Bill Harding
Reply to David Green
The problem is the economy is too good to slow down, so the BoC put the brakes on. They do this when the economy overheats, and they should have reacted earlier.
 
 
David Amos
Content Deactivated
Reply by Arron Wheatly
I concur
 
 
Arron Wheatly
Reply by Bill Harding
The economy is not too good. Just the opposite. If can't see it that's on you. The fact is there is too much cash chasing too few goods because of monetary policy.
 
 
David Amos
Reply by Arron Wheatly
Kinda sorta true
 

Craig Macneil
Reply by Arron Wheatly
Best economy in Canada's history.To much cash because the economy is so good and wages rose.
 
 
David Green
Reply by Bill Harding
Our economy is not healthy the is little investment other than more government debt.
 
 
Arron Wheatly
Reply by Craig Macneil
Remember Yuk Yuks? Go there right now.
 
 
Craig Macneil
Reply by Arron Wheatly
Remember google....Use it but then again I don't think facts are your thing. 
 
 



Horst Jakob
To all those that say I had a 14% mortgage once , I had one too , but I payed "only " sixty thousand for my home.

A lot of money back then but no comparison to today.
 

Craig Macneil
Reply to Horst Jakob
Wages was one quarter what they are now.
 
 
Arron Wheatly
Reply to Horst Jakob
especially considering wages have not kept up to the cooked inflation numbers.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Horst Jakob
I had a home mortgage and business debts as well back in the early eighties when interest rates went through the roof
 
 
John Oliver
Reply to Horst Jakob
I had a 6%+ rate in the last 20 years and I borrowed a lot more than 60 grand. More than double.
 
 
Brent Hiker
Reply to Horst Jakob
It's all relative.
 
 
Bob Wessels
Reply to Horst Jakob
inflation
 
 
John Oliver
Reply to Craig Macneil
Wages would depend on job, city and exact time and place - I could counter - yeah, one wage-earner.
 
 
John Decarted
Reply to Horst Jakob
ah yes, bo omers post this endlessly, forgetting that the wage to cost of living and housing indexes were waaaaaayyyy better back then
 
 
Arron Wheatly
Reply to Craig Macneil
Purchasing power was much higher back then.
 
 
Craig Macneil
Reply to John Oliver
Out of school as a millwright my first job paid 9 a hour.My son's first job as a Millwright paid 27 a hour.
 
 
Arron Wheatly
Reply to Craig Macneil
Apprentice.
 
 
Craig Macneil
Reply to John Decarted
I'm 54 
 
 
Craig Macneil
Reply to Arron Wheatly
How did 12 percent interest rates then make purchasing power better?
 
 
John Decarted
Reply to Craig Macneil
then you're young enough to use the internet to find the data
 
 
Craig Macneil
Reply to John Decarted
What data?
 
 
Colinda Bean
Reply to John Decarted
What 's "internet?" would have been the question in the 80's! 
 
 
Horst Jakob
Reply to Craig Macneil
I was a tradesman back then, $13 hour.
 
 
 
 
 
Brent Hiker
In May, year-over-year consumer price inflation fell to 3.4 per cent, from 4.4 per cent in April. That’s less than half the peak inflation recorded last June (8.1 per cent). Grocery prices, however, are still rising at a dizzying pace. Grocery inflation was 9.0 per cent in May, barely changed from April.

Meanwhile, the costs of most inputs purchased by food retailers have slowed rapidly — and in some cases are falling outright. Crop prices fell 22 per cent over the last year. Energy costs fell by one-third. Meat and dairy inputs rose just 4.5 per cent (half the pace of final groceries), and fruit and vegetable inputs just 1.2 per cent.

The cost of producing and selling groceries is moderating. Yet grocery prices are still surging. What gives? - The Star July 9/23
 

Troy Bodi
Reply to Brent Hiker
We gives. And Galen takes.
 
 
Craig Macneil
Reply to Brent Hiker
Corporate greed
 
 
William Best
Reply to Brent Hiker
Supermarket CEOs blame higher costs for their own inputs and purchases, claiming they are simply passing those costs on to consumers. But elementary school math tells you that if costs and prices grow by the same amount, profits won’t change. Even if nominal profits merely kept pace with higher prices, margins wouldn’t change — yet they have grown significantly.
 
 
David Green
Reply to Brent Hiker
We see those inflation numbers posted that claim inflation is down but with ever increasing grocery, energy and housing expenses that claim seems to be unfounded.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Craig Macneil
Bingo 
 
 
Steve Brockhouse
Reply to David Green
"Inflation down" does NOT mean prices down. 
 
 
David Green
Reply to Steve Brockhouse
Steadily increasing prices 8% for groceries is NOT DOWN



No comments:

Post a Comment