Monday, 18 March 2024

No surprises in final N.B. budget before election, minister says

 
 

Pre-election New Brunswick budget stays the course on taxes, health spending

After 4 larger-than-expected surpluses, finance minister warns again that big revenues may not last

The Higgs government has delivered a stand-pat provincial budget that avoids new spending measures, tax cuts or other gimmicks that might curry favour with voters ahead of the election this fall.

Finance Minister Ernie Steeves has opted to stay the course rather than slash taxes or throw huge new sums of money at the health-care system.

That leaves him projecting another small surplus for 2024-25 of just $41 million.

Steeves has vastly underestimated the surplus in each of the last four years, but this year he is again repeating his warning that higher-than-expected revenue for the government is bound to come to an end.

"Revenue is not anticipated to continue the pace of growth seen in recent years, and maintaining spending growth at current levels will not be sustainable over the longer term," he said in his budget speech delivered in the legislature.

"The fiscal plan I have outlined today reflects the needs of a growing province, recognizes the volatile times we find ourselves in, and considers the need to remain fiscally responsible over the longer term."

A man with grey hair and glasses, wearing a collared shirt, tie and blazer, speaks into several microphones and recorders being held by reporters. Steeves and Premier Blaine Higgs have bragged that reducing the debt has also reduced the amount the province must spend on servicing interest charges on the debt. (Radio-Canada)

Notably, the health budget is nudging up by only $1.6 million over the province's revised spending figure this year.

That is despite several increases including:

  • $70 million more for regional health authorities.
  • $22.9 million for new technologies, including improved electronic medical records and other new systems and tools.
  • $20 million to continue expanding collaborative primary-care centres.

Steeves said those new items are offset by one-time costs this year that won't repeat in the coming year, including the large amounts paid to private companies providing travel nurses to fill staffing gaps.

The new amounts are still far from the $600 million in new spending recently demanded by the New Brunswick Medical Society and the New Brunswick Nurses Union. 

They were looking for $70 million for primary care clinics, an amount they said would be enough for 50 such centres around the province. 

Medical society president Dr. Paula Keating said the organization was "somewhat disappointed" because it's not clear how many clinics the $20 million will create.

Opposition leaders weigh in

Opposition party leaders said the money falls short of what's needed. 

Liberal Leader Susan Holt said there was nothing in the budget that "transforms" the system. 

"It sounds to me like they're moving money around without having put new money into the system," she said.

Green Leader David Coon called it "really quite shocking, given the crisis that we face."

Steeves told reporters at a news conference that there could be "considerable" additional spending when the province negotiates a new wage contract with nurses in the coming months. 

Another stay-the-course element was a repeated commitment — first made in October 2022 — to spend $102 million building or upgrading 380 public housing units. 

WATCH | CBC's Jacques Poitras on what's in the budget:
 

New Brunswick’s stay-the-course budget unveiled

Duration 1:08
In the last budget before the next provincial election, the New Brunswick government projects a small surplus and opts not to cut taxes or spend large, new sums of money on the health-care system.

Steeves said work on "nearly" half of those units will start this year, indicating little to no work has been done in the 17 months since the initial announcement.

The budget includes $68.9 million for the New Brunswick Housing Corporation, a 54.1 per cent increase over the current year.

It also includes new spending in education, such as $18.6 million to help school districts cope with enrolment growth and $24.3 million for rising energy and transportation costs.

There's also $7.8 million to try to improve literacy and numeracy scores, which have been dropping. 

No tax cuts — for now

The minister underlined several of the tax cuts and affordability benefits the government has announced in the last year, but his budget included no new measures aimed at helping New Brunswickers cope with the cost of living.

Asked if new tax cuts could be announced before the election campaign, Steeves did not answer directly but said he was speaking to his staff recently about the possibility of more reductions in the future.  

"If we do a tax cut announcement, it won't be because of an election," he said. "It'll be because it's right for New Brunswick. We don't have a timeframe for it yet. … We've started talking about it. We think it's a good idea."

He repeatedly encouraged New Brunswickers with household incomes of less than $70,000 a year to apply for a previously announced $300 workers benefit.

Missed tax relief: taxpayer federation

The Canadian Taxpayers Federation applauded another balanced budget but criticized the spending increases and lack of new tax cuts.

"New Brunswickers could have gotten hundreds of millions of dollars in tax relief," said interim Atlantic director Jay Goldberg.

"Unfortunately, the spending restraint the Higgs government exercised in previous years was missing from this year's budget."

Other measures announced in the budget include: 

  • A new system for adjudicating child protection cases that should divert more than half of the cases from ending up in court in front of a judge.
  • An increase in social assistance benefits of 3.6 per cent. 
  • $29.7 million for wage increases for employees working in sectors including special care homes, group homes, home support, community residences, attendant care, family support and specialized placements.

Robert MacKay of the Common Front for Social Justice said the increase in social assistance rates reflects a required hike to match inflation and isn't enough.

"That would not be going up," he said. "It's not an increase. It's treading water." 

Steeves's small surplus projection — and his hesitation to spend large amounts of new money — follows four straight years of budgets that ended up wildly off-target, with much larger surpluses than forecast each year. 

The most recent fiscal update projects a $247.4 million surplus by the end of the current fiscal year of 2023-24, well beyond the $40.3 million Steeves predicted last March.

That followed unexpectedly large surpluses of $400 million in 2021, $769 million in 2022 and $1.01 billion last year.

Earlier this year, Steeves blamed the missed targets on the federal government for underestimating how much income and sales tax revenue it would collect on behalf of the province.

Economist Richard Saillant, who has criticized the inaccurate forecasting in the past, said he believes this year's budget is more realistic in its estimates.

The cumulative provincial debt will increase by $315 million this year after several years of decreases. But it will continue to shrink as a percentage of the province's economic output. 

Steeves and Premier Blaine Higgs have bragged that reducing the debt has also reduced the amount the province must spend on servicing interest charges on the debt. 

But the higher debt forecast in the new budget means debt service costs are also forecast to increase in the coming year by $65.6 million. 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Jacques Poitras

Provincial Affairs reporter

Jacques Poitras has been CBC's provincial affairs reporter in New Brunswick since 2000. He grew up in Moncton and covered Parliament in Ottawa for the New Brunswick Telegraph-Journal. He has reported on every New Brunswick election since 1995 and won awards from the Radio Television Digital News Association, the National Newspaper Awards and Amnesty International. He is also the author of five non-fiction books about New Brunswick politics and history.

 
 
 

 
David Amos
Methinks Higgy and Mr Outhouse may be hoping that enough of his caucus decide to go for early retirement and vote against the budget so they can enjoy this spring and summer without a worry about being politically correct and keeping their not so popular boss happy at the same time N'esy Pas?  
 
 
 
David Amos
The Canadian Taxpayers Federation applauded another balanced budget but criticized the spending increases and lack of new tax cuts.

"New Brunswickers could have gotten hundreds of millions of dollars in tax relief," said interim Atlantic director Jay Goldberg.

"Unfortunately, the spending restraint the Higgs government exercised in previous years was missing from this year's budget."

Too Too Funny

 
Bala Viswa 
Reply to David Amos  
Exactly. It is easy to show a surplus when you don't spend on requirements. 
 
 
 
 
Ben Brown  
The 8th anniversary of the implementation of the Phoenix payroll system isn’t news or noteworthy
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Ben Brown  
Of course not 
 
 
Ben Brown 
Reply to David Amos
Even as the damage continues to this day
 
 
 
 
 
scott barclay 
Health care not available. But let's not spend our surplus.
 
 
David Wilson
Reply to scott barclay 
It is the Conservative way. One would think we would have learned by now.  
 
 
Matt Adams  
Reply to scott barclay 
we are billions in debt.  
 
 
David Wilson
Reply to Matt Adams 
All govetnments run massive debts.... kinda the way countries function.

Although it is always a convenient excuse to cut services, particularily to prople that need them the most, while further lining pockets of the wealthy.

 
scott barclay
Reply to Matt Adams
It says NB has a surplus in the article.  
 
 
Bobby Richards
Reply to scott barclay  
So let's underfund healthcare for the next 52 years until the debt is fully paid. 
 
 
Don Corey
Reply to David Wilson 
The "massive debts" now translate into huge interest payments on such debt. The federal number this year will be more than $50 billion; that's certainly nothing to be proud of. 
 
 
David Amos 
Reply to Don Corey  
The solution to the New Brunswick debt that I proposed in 2013 would still work today  
 
 
 
 
Claire Ross 
Poitras has got to drum up the anti Tory stuff as the election draws near.

Its in his job description.

 
G. Timothy Walton 
Reply to Claire Ross   
Pointing out the government's flaws, mistakes, and worse is the job of a political reporter.

If the Liberals were in, it would be his job to apply the same standards to Holt and company.

   
Claire Ross  
Reply to G. Timothy Walton
need proof.

Suddenly this chain is being "reviewed".

Wonder why?

 
Bobby Richards
Reply to Claire Ross  
Higgs does a good job of feeding him material though. 
 
 
G. Timothy Walton 
Reply to Claire Ross   
Some days it seems like every post I make gets the under-review notice.   
 
 
David Amos 
Reply to G. Timothy Walton 
You are not alone
 
 
David Amos 
Reply to G. Timothy Walton
BTW the answer to your last question to me was Yes  
 
 
Rosco holt 
Reply to Claire Ross  
Don't see many media reporting NB government actions or lack of. 
 
 
 
 
David Wilson 
Wait a second here.....I thought the Cons said healthcare was broken? 
 
 
David Wilson
Reply to David Wilson 
Oh never mind I just remembered it was their policies that broke it. 


Don Corey
Reply to David Wilson 
Perhaps you could make an effort to stay better informed. The sorry state of healthcare is a Canada-wide problem. It's just one of many crises that have plagued the country under the current federal government. 
 
 
Daniel Malooney 
Reply to Don Corey
na, not buying that load

the current government has put more money into healthcare, yes he maintained the previous governments commitment to increases, but he's put more new money in with conditions that actually see real value for money rather than throwing more money into the provincial black holes.

the previous government was kind enough to decide without any consultation that they would be imposing a limit of 3% or GDP whichever was higher, this after the liberals had started to reinvest after they bludgeoned healthcare with cuts to get the budget under control

blaming a single government is very myopic, looking at the bigger picture because investment takes time to materialize

 
Don Corey
Reply to Daniel Malooney 
Well, that's a mediocre response at best. I have to question who is failing to really/seriously/objectively look at the "bigger picture", and it's definitely not me. 
 
 
Elliott Stranger 
Reply to Don Corey 
Healthcare is a provincial responsibility so… 
 
 
David Amos 

Reply to Don Corey 
Welcome back to the circus 
 
 
David Amos 
Reply to Don Corey
Did you stock up on popcorn and peanuts? 
 
 
Don Corey
Reply to David Amos 
Been thinking about it; have a good supply of dog treats anyway. 
 
 
Don Corey
Reply to Elliott Stranger  
That's what the feds kept saying about housing, until....well, surely you know why. 
 
 
 
 
 

No surprises in final N.B. budget before election, minister says

Ernie Steeves says tax cuts 'would certainly be in our future'

New Brunswick's finance minister says people shouldn't expect any major surprises in his final provincial budget before a scheduled election this fall.

Ernie Steeves told reporters that he won't be dangling any gimmicks designed to win votes. 

"We don't generally do that in our budgets. It's a budget that is planning, showing the plan, for the future of New Brunswick," he said.

Steeves showed off printed English and French versions of his budget speech bearing the slogan "Stronger Than Ever" — the same phrase the Progressive Conservative Party put on a campaign bus it rented last fall in case of an early election call.

"The slogan works," Steeves said. "I don't know. Maybe they had it all written out ahead of time. No, they didn't. But stronger is the theme." 

Tuesday's budget will lay out spending and revenue plans for the 2024-25 fiscal year, which begins April 1.

WATCH | Ernie Steeves on eve of budget day:
 

N.B. finance minister previews budget plan

Duration 0:46
Finance Minister Ernie Steeves will unveil New Brunswick's budget Tuesday and says while there won't be any big surprises, he hinted at tax cuts and said there will be 'a lot of new money.'

It follows four straight years of budgets that ended up wildly off-target, with much larger surpluses than forecast each year. 

The most recent fiscal update projects a $247.4-million surplus by the end of the current fiscal year of 2023-24, well beyond the $40.3 million Steeves predicted last March.

That followed surpluses of $400 million in 2021, $769 million in 2022 and $1.01 billion last year.

Opposition parties have accused the Tories of lowballing their estimates to avoid pressure to spend more money. 

But Steeves has blamed the federal government for inaccurate projections of sales and income revenue, which it collects on behalf of the province.

The minister said Monday there were "slight changes" coming in how the province handles Ottawa's figures, but "it'll still depend on what happens with the feds. They control that, not us." 

Steeves said tax cuts "would certainly be in our future" and said there will be "significant" increases to health-care spending, though he wouldn't say if he's adding the $600 million that provincial doctors and nurses recently called for.

He will introduce the budget shortly after the legislature reconvenes at 1 p.m. Tuesday. 

The election is scheduled for Oct. 21. 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Jacques Poitras

Provincial Affairs reporter

Jacques Poitras has been CBC's provincial affairs reporter in New Brunswick since 2000. He grew up in Moncton and covered Parliament in Ottawa for the New Brunswick Telegraph-Journal. He has reported on every New Brunswick election since 1995 and won awards from the Radio Television Digital News Association, the National Newspaper Awards and Amnesty International. He is also the author of five non-fiction books about New Brunswick politics and history.

 
 
 

 
 
 
David Amos
"Ernie Steeves told reporters that he won’t be dangling any gimmicks designed to win votes."

Yea Right

 
Don Corey 
Reply to David Amos 
I figure there'll be a fair amount in the budget that's thinking ahead to the election. 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Don Corey   
Its comical that he would attempt to claim otherwise  
 
 
Bobby Richards 
Reply to Don Corey
Maybe he'll toss an extra $100 to healthcare.  
 
 
Don Corey 
Reply to Bobby Richards 
Actually, it's going to be a very significant amount.
 
 
 
 
Don Corey 
There's certainly no shortage of budget priorities, especially so because of the many Canada-wide crises created by the federal government.

The top three for NB should be

1. Healthcare; a significant increase in spending along with a realistic, ambitious and well-communicated action plan to go with it.

2. Cost of living; reduce the provincial portion of the HST by 2%. In other words, wipe out the 2% increase in 2016, courtesy of the free spending Gallant government. This will benefit all NB'ers, and not just a select group.

3. Housing; yet another crisis thanks to the federal government, but it's time for this government to step in and take it seriously. The few crumbs thrown out to currently held Liberal ridings amount to a drop in the bucket. 

 
David Amos
Reply to Don Corey     
I would be happy to get the Healthcare money Higgy has owed me for years
 

Don Corey 
Reply to David Amos 
Perhaps someone will actually (and finally) stop the games and pay up. 
 
 
David Amos

Reply to Don Corey   
The dude I read the riot act to tonight should sit up and pay attention 
 
 
 
 
Frank Blacklock  
A surplus and pay off some debt seems good. Better than Canada’s worst finance minister of all time, Chrystia Freeland, who doubled the national debt almost by herself.  
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Frank Blacklock   
C'est Vrai 
 
 
Don Corey 
Reply to Frank Blacklock   
She just did exactly what her boss told her to do. 
 
 
Bobby Richards 
Reply to Don Corey 
Just like Ernie 
 
 
Don Corey 
Reply to Bobby Richards
Yep. 




Fred Sanford
The government and municipalities are making a fortune off property tax assessments that have increased 50-100% in the last three years. I have no issue with the assessments reflecting true market value, but the rates should be lowered. The re-adjustment of the housing market should not be a revenue windfall for the government!   
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Fred Sanford
IMHO The double tax on the old folks' homes as soon as they get a bed in a Health Care Home is a SIN  
 
Lou Bell
Reply to Fred Sanford
The Municipalities set the rate . It's to be used for infrastructure , wages mostly , and by the Municipality . 
 
 
 
 
Doug kirby 
He may not dangle carrots but he dangles other things to keep up with higgs heavy hand 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Doug kirby 
Please elaborate 
 
 
Doug kirby
Reply to David Amos
It would get removed if I said
 
 
 
Ron parker
is it just me or does this guy not know what he is doing?
 
 
Steve Gordon
Reply to Ron parker
Its just you.
 
 
Ron parker
Reply to Steve Gordon 
thanks, I thought it was just me.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Steve Gordon  
Nope its not just him who is wondering
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Ron parker
Think again  
 
 
Bobby Richards
Reply to Ron parker 
Says it all. "I don't know. Maybe they had it all written out ahead of time. No, they didn't." 
 
 
 
 
William Peters 
No thanks, we don't nee more tax cuts for the rich to prop up this narrative. Raise taxes on the wealthy please. We need to see net tax increases. For the rest, act to curtail cost of living increases with your legislative powers.  
 
 
Fred Sanford 
Reply to William Peters 
Let me guess, "the wealthy" are everyone making more than you? 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Fred Sanford
Everyone is making more than the seniors surviving on CPP OAS  
 
 
Lou Bell
Reply to David Amos  
Many who were the recipients of the low paying , minimum wage jobs that were created by the McKenna liberals and that left them completely unprepared for retirement . " long term pain for short term gain " , and the rest of us have been paying for mit ever since . 



 
Steve Alexander
I bet his wife does the family budget.  
 
 
Don Corey 
Reply to Steve Alexander  
We have well-paid civil servants who are responsible for crunching the numbers. From there, they do what they're told. That's the way budgeting works with all governments.

They seem to have difficulty in getting accurate projections on revenues such as sales tax from the federal government, but that should come as no surprise. Nothing from the feds ever adds up, and they could care less.

 
David Amos
Reply to Steve Alexander 
Doesn't yours?  
 
 
Steve Alexander
Reply to Steve Alexander  
No 


Steve Alexander
Reply to Steve Alexander   
I can assure you if anyone submitted a budget to Jim Irving and at the end had a surplus or a deficit heads would roll! 
 
 
Ron parker
Reply to Don Corey  
maybe we don't need ministers if the civic servants do the work.
 
 
Don Corey 
Reply to Ron parker 
That's not what I was implying.  
 
 
 
 
G. Timothy Walton 
If a tax cut is all the help you need, you probably don't _need_ help; it's useless if you're so poor you don't pay any income tax.

Healthcare, on the other hand, affects everyone.

 
David Amos
Reply to G. Timothy Walton 
Heathcare affects some more than others  
 
 
G. Timothy Walton 
Reply to David Amos  
And?  
 
 
David Amos
Reply to G. Timothy Walton  
I had to pay for mine 
 
 
G. Timothy Walton 
Reply to David Amos
Were you a resident of the province at the time?
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment