Friday, 15 November 2024

N.B. deficit projection jumps to $92.1 million, squeezing Liberal promises

 
 

N.B. deficit projection jumps to $92.1 million, squeezing Liberal promises

Finance Minister René Legacy hedges on cost of nurse bonuses party committed to during campaign

The new Liberal government of Premier Susan Holt is adding some asterisks to its election promises as it faces a higher-than-expected budget deficit left behind by the previous Progressive Conservative government.

Finance Minister René Legacy released a second-quarter update for fiscal 2024-25 that projects a deficit of $92.1 million as of Sept. 30.

That is $132 million worse than the $40 million surplus that previous PC finance minister Ernie Steeves forecast in his budget in March.

And it's $64.5 million worse than the deficit Steeves himself projected in his final fiscal update at the end of August.

WATCH | Why a new budget update could upset Liberal plans:
 

Liberal promises threatened by $92-million deficit projection

The Liberals committed to balanced budgets and nurse retention bonuses — and are now hedging on both.

"These results represent a period when the previous government was in place," Legacy said.

To make matters worse, Legacy said, there are indications that the province won't collect a revenue windfall in the third quarter, which is when the federal government remits income tax and sales tax revenue it collects to the province.

Ernie Steeves smiling The updated projection is $132 million worse than the $40 million surplus that previous PC finance minister Ernie Steeves, pictured here, forecast in his budget in March. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)

In recent years, that revenue has been much higher than expected, leading to a series of record-breaking budget surpluses for the Higgs PC government.

But this year, "it doesn't look like we're going to be in previous years' situations, where revenues are just going to grow and take care of everything," Legacy said.

The shortfall may put the squeeze on some key Liberal election commitments.

The party promised $10,000 bonuses this year for nurses, nurse practitioners and licensed practical nurses as a way to persuade them to stay in their jobs.

That was expected to cost $74.3 million in 2024-25, Holt said while campaigning on Sept. 20, but Legacy wouldn't commit to that figure Friday.

"We have some major commitments that are to be done within the next legislative session," he said. "Some of those will be announced and the appropriate pricing and costing will all come along in the next coming weeks."

A closeup of a woman with shoulder-length, brown hair, wearing a black blouse and mauve blazer. Green Party health critic Megan Mitton says the Liberals must not sacrifice investments in health care to keep their promise to balance budgets. (Ed Hunter/CBC)

Asked about the $74 million figure in the platform, the minister said, "we're still adjusting, we're still working it through, so when the final number comes in, we'll be announcing it." 

Green Party health critic Megan Mitton said the Liberals must not sacrifice investments in health care to keep their promise to balanced budgets.

"I think New Brunswickers understand that it might make sense to put major investments right now in health care that are going to pay off longer-term."

Legacy suggested the Liberal promise to run balanced budgets during their mandate doesn't apply to the current 2024-25 fiscal year because it's covered by the PC budget Steeves delivered back in March.

"I am committed to balanced budgets in each year of our mandate, and of course our first budget will be '25-26," he said.

Notably, Legacy's mandate letter, in which Holt lays out what she wants him to do as minister, says he'll be measured on achieving a balanced budget in 2025-26 – "what we control," he said — but not this year. 

Even so, the minister said he's asking officials to assess whether a "course correction" on spending is needed this year and to look for potential savings that can be found in various departments to reduce or eliminate this year's projected deficit. 

Friday's update shows revenue forecast to be $118 million higher than expected, but that is more that wiped out by the projection that spending will be $251.8 million over budget.

That includes $193 million in unforeseen spending at the Department of Health, some of it the result of travel nurse contracts.

In a statement, Glen Savoie, the interim PC leader, said the projected deficit was being driven by health-care costs, and his party would be watching what decisions the Liberals make in the remainder of the fiscal year, given their campaign costing.

During the election, the PCs accused the Liberals of a $1 billion mistake in their platform costing.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Jacques Poitras

Provincial Affairs reporter

Jacques Poitras has been CBC's provincial affairs reporter in New Brunswick since 2000. He grew up in Moncton and covered Parliament in Ottawa for the New Brunswick Telegraph-Journal. He has reported on every New Brunswick election since 1995 and won awards from the Radio Television Digital News Association, the National Newspaper Awards and Amnesty International. He is also the author of five non-fiction books about New Brunswick politics and history.

 
 
 
187 Comments
 
 
 
Samual Johnston
Funny to see the monitoring of the written words here.   
 
 

David Amos
Content Deactivated

Perhaps our new Minister of Health can use his secret settlement with Higgy to help a few nurses in need of more money

Lou Bell
Content Deactivated 
Reply to David Amos
It's become quite evident Ms. Holt is passing the buck on her cabinet posts and that blame will not be a part of what she will accept . The liberals are gonna need every MLA they have to fill the vacant Ministerial posts when they start to fail . And they certainly will

Allan Marven
Content Deactivated 
Reply to Lou Bell
Pc's looking for new leader. good job for ya.  



Lou Bell
Content Deactivated


David Amos
Content Deactivated 
Reply to Lou Bell
I can act surprised if I want to



David Amos
Surprise Surprise Surprise 
 
Larry McCarthy
Reply to David Amos
Yep, Higgs and Steeves left "surprises"!
 
Gordon MacFarlane 
Reply to Larry McCarthy
And the government elect are pretending they didn't know.

Tsk tsk

Larry McCarthy
Reply to Gordon MacFarlane 
How would they know? Did they have access to the books? Nope.  
 
Gordon MacFarlane 
Reply to Larry McCarthy
Your first election is it?

They all do it, all the time

Same p...

Different pile

Larry McCarthy
Reply to Gordon MacFarlane
Since when do oppostion parties have access to the books prior to an election? Your first one, perhaps?  
 
Gordon MacFarlane 
Reply to Larry McCarthy
If you prefer to believe that this government, having just read from the same script almost every incoming govt in Canada has read from for a century, is the first one that is sincere, feel free 
 
Larry McCarthy
Reply to Gordon MacFarlane 
Sure thing! There was no "crafting" of the books for an election? 
 
Gordon MacFarlane 
Reply to Larry McCarthy
I am sure there was.

And I am likewise sure that the incoming govt was well aware of it

This is not a partisan thing so much as an all party standard

Larry McCarthy
Reply to Gordon MacFarlane 
Thanks. At least now we're reading from the same page. 
 
Gordon MacFarlane 
Reply to Larry McCarthy
Absolutely, this was never meant as a partisan jab. I have heard much the same from numerous governments, federal provincial and municipal and from every major party.

Rather like the initial cost of a big govt project never being close to the final price.

Standard fare...it keeps happening.

Larry McCarthy
Reply to Gordon MacFarlane
My apologies for the misunderstanding.  
 
Gordon MacFarlane 
Reply to Larry McCarthy
All good sir. Apology not needed but accepted happily.

Enjoy your day and thanks for a nice exchange

Larry McCarthy
Reply to Gordon MacFarlane 
Ditto, my friend. 

David Amos
Reply to Gordon MacFarlane
Plus ca change C'est la meme chose N'esy Pas?
 


Alex Stevens
Same game every election. Promise the world, then blame the books. The books are always 'cooked'. Every election, no matter which party. Same game.

Bob Palmer
Reply to Alex Stevens
Agreed

Denis Reagan
Reply to Alex Stevens
Them books could always use some foreign seasoning while cooking.

Larry McCarthy
Reply to Alex Stevens
Higgs would never "cook the books" for an election, eh?

David Amos
Reply to Alex Stevens
C'est Vrai 
 
 

Corrie Weatherfield
well this is so surprising . . . but it is already more than 3 weeks with this wonderful new "team" before they started to back track and say . . . "but its not our fault . . . " wonder when we'll see the tax reduction on power bills now that the new 9 plus % increase is a go?

Denis Reagan
Reply to Corrie Weatherfield
This new team is not telling the truth? Explain?

David Amos
Reply to Corrie Weatherfield
We will have to wait until April Fools Day to see if they were joking or not



Bob Palmer
But but 2 weeks ago all was good what happened. I guess the previous gov could not add.(never heard that before)

Larry McCarthy
Reply to Bob Palmer
A budget "drafted" by Higgs and Co. for the election, perhaps?

David Amos
Reply to Bob Palmer
Surely you jest



James Wolf
Debt deth spiral starts.

Larry McCarthy

Reply to James Wolf
It already started under Higgs! Read the article, perhaps?

David Amos
Reply to James Wolf
Yup

David Amos
Reply to Larry McCarthy
Methinks your knickers are in quite a knot today N'esy Pas?

Larry McCarthy
Reply to David Amos
Pourquoi penseriez-vous que?

David Amos
Reply to Larry McCarthy
I can read

Larry McCarthy
Reply to David Amos
Moi aussi! 

Don Corey
Reply to David Amos
Yep, they sure are lol. 
 
David Amos
Content Deactivated  
Reply to Don Corey
Welcome back to the circus
 
 
ROUND 2 
 
15 Comments
 
 
David Amos
Surprise Surprise Surprise

David Amos
Reply to David Amos 
ROUND 2 
 
 

Don Corey
So we're now looking at a possible deficit because of non-budgeted increases in healthcare spending by that terrible PC government. Given all the Holt promises re healthcare and everything else under the sun, this projected $92 million deficit will look very insignificant compared to what we'll see in another year or two.
 
David Amos
Reply to Don Corey
Welcome back to the circus
 
 
 
MR Cain 
Now the fun begins; the previous government made a mess of our finances.
 
Don Corey
Reply to MR Cain  
No, the mess is just getting started. 
 
David Amos
Reply to Don Corey
No doubt about it  
 
 
 
Les Cooper  
Don't worry. The budget will fix itself!! 
 
David Amos
Reply to Les Cooper  
Who is worried?



Lou Bell  
The Liberals have hundreds of millions promised before the end of this budget year , and as expected , are attempting to download this onto the past Conservative government . Broken promises , or broken taxpayers ? Which will it be Ms. Holt ?? 
 
Don Corey
Reply to Lou Bell 
It’ll probably be a combination of the two. 
 
David Amos
Reply to Don Corey
Yup 
 
 
 
Lou Bell  
Premier Higgs was able to pull the provinces debt and deficits back due to intelliigent fiscal management . Unfortinately , the Liberals lack any persons who qualify for such a task . Trying to download Ms. Holts peomises on the backs of the conservatives is exactly as expected . Perhps a certificate from the " Carney 2 Hour Seminar " on proper fiscal management would make the Liberals feel better . Won't help their dire needs , btut , like with their Fed counterparts , may make them think they're smarter than what they are . 
 
Don Corey
Reply to Lou Bell 
It shouldn't be expecting a lot to think that they just have to be smarter than their federal friends. 
 
David Amos
Reply to Don Corey
True  
 
 
 
 

Deficit grows to $92M, minister blames previous Tory government

Revenues were higher than expected, but spending was even higher, putting New Brunswick into solid deficit territory

The provincial government’s projected deficit has grown to $92 million, and the new finance minister is blaming the previous Progressive Conservative regime, arguing he only has four months left in the fiscal year to turn things around and balance the budget.

René Legacy released his province’s second-quarter results on Friday, and the picture is gloomier than at budget time last spring, when the Tories predicted a rosy $41-million surplus.

It is also a significant erosion since the first quarter update, representing the first three months of the fiscal year from April to June. Former Tory finance minister Ernie Steeves reported during the first-quarter fiscal update that the deficit was estimated at $28 million.

“We’re still committed to trying to shrink down that deficit,” Legacy told reporters at a media conference in Fredericton. “The previous government had a plan. They put it in earlier this year with their budget. The plan was to have a $41-million surplus.

“I’m asking my staff if there’s any course correction we can take to maybe bring that down. But obviously this is the starting point that we have.”

Glen Savoie, leader of the Tory Opposition, said the numbers in the update did not come as a surprise.

“Despite a budget of nearly $3.8 billion, the cost of health care for New Brunswickers has driven this deficit,” he said in an email. “The Opposition will be watching to see what new charges the Liberal government applies to the fourth quarter numbers, given they have a one-billion-dollar math mistake in their latest Liberal platform,” he said, without elaborating.

The charge about a $1-billion accounting mistake was made repeatedly by the Tories during the election campaign, but the Liberals stood by the numbers in their platform, steadfastly denying they had made an error.

Pressed by reporters on Friday, the new Liberal finance minister, only 12 days into his job, didn’t have any ideas where he’d find savings. He said he only received the latest figures last week and wanted to get them out before the public, to be as transparent as possible.

The problem appears to be related to spending, not the amount of money coming into government coffers.

Total revenue is projected to be $119 million higher than budget, due in part to an increase in conditional grants from Ottawa and gains in both personal and corporate income tax.

But total expenses are projected to be over budget by $252 million. The most significant difference is in the Department of Health, which is over budget by $193 million due to higher operating and labour costs in the regional health authorities. A significant portion of this, the government says, is caused by overtime and travel nurse costs.

The travel nurse contracts, a $98-million expense in 2024-25 alone, created a flood of controversy earlier this year when they made the national news. Even former premier Blaine Higgs was critical of them, blaming the Vitalité Health Network for signing bad deals with private firms.

Legacy said he was straight jacketed by those contracts but is also hemmed in by the higher expenses because his Liberal government has promised not to penny pinch on health care, where there is significant demand from the public for better services in crowded ERs and clinics.

The $92-million estimated deficit represents less than one per cent of the province’s $13.5 billion budget. That’s why the finance minister said he’d asked all departments other than health to be cautious in their spending.

The Liberals had promised to balance budgets, just like Higgs did in every one of his six years in power – the longest string of balanced budgets in the country – but Legacy believes the previous government is mostly responsible for the red ink that could be spilled by the spring.

“There is opportunity for us to reach out to the departments to try to curtail some of the proposed spending, but because we’re in the eighth month of the fiscal year, we’re starting to be limited on what we can do on that.”

Megan Mitton, deputy leader of the Green Party, said the focus on deficits and surpluses was misguided.

She told reporters Friday the politicians should be more concerned about offering decent public services.

“We have some major crises and one of the top ones is definitely health care,” she said. “That may require a deficit budget this year in order to invest in things like retention bonuses for nurses and preventative health care.”

She said it made more fiscal sense to pay homegrown nurses properly rather than sign expensive contracts for travel nurses, whose companies often charge double or triple normal costs.

“If people don’t have access to primary health care, can’t be seen in the ER, don’t have housing, don’t know where their next meal is coming from, top of mind isn’t, ‘oh does the government have a deficit this year?’ Top of mind is what’s going to happen to help me? Because there are people in crisis right now.”

 
 
Telegraph-Journal is part of the Local Journalism Initiative and reporters are funded by the Government of Canada to produce civic journalism for underserved communities. Learn more about the initiative 
 
  • Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.

    All Comments

    1. Comment by Michel Jones.

    Health care is broken because it's free.. If you want to brake something, make it free, works every time with every thing.

  • Comment by Glenn Smith.

  • 😂😂😂😢😢😢


  • Comment by Joel Lemon.

  • How can you blame this on the new government? They have only been in power 2 weeks.

    • Reply by Bev Leblanc.

    Well they seemed to be screaming a lot about the surplus, and seemed to think that meant there was going to be a big pot of money to play with after they were elected. It was explained several times that the surplus just meant that spending was less than projected. NB has always carried a debt load. Funny how quickly the news "writers" forget that. I don't think they understood the whole concept either.



  • Comment by Dianne MacPherson.

  • Didn't I read somewhere that part of

    Holt's Election Promises was based

    on the fact that the Higgs' Gov't.

    always had balanced Budgets so

    therefore there would be money

    in the kitty to work with !!


  • Comment by Randall avery.

  • And so it begins! That didn't take long. Got what you voted for electorate.


  • Comment by Theresa Poirier.

  • Here we go again.

    • Reply by Mke Connors.

    the question is where did the "surplus" go the last 6 years while people died in emergency room waiting rooms? Ernie, the DJ and Blaine Higgs told us we had this surplus, where did it go?


  • Reply by Randall avery.

  • It was applied to the monster 12 BILLION dollar debt, not including 5 BILLION for NB Power, who the heck do you think is going to pay for that? I know who will, my kids will and that's indecent. You socialists got what you voted for, nice. Hope you feel good running back to deficit.


  • Comment by Hubert Blaquiere.

  • More of the same......Old school political deceitfulness. Oddly enough, its the same thing the Conservatives said about the LIberals when they took over government.... oh and the same thing the previous Liberals said when they took over government from the Conservatives.... and so on and so on.... Every new government has said the same about the previous.... and yet, none has done anyting meaningful about it, other then increase the provincial debt and the cost to service that debt. A new government claims things were worse off then the previous government elude too... and the following year, they all of a sudden show a surplus.... oh and look, how good this new government is..... more of the same ole same ole. This is how Holt vowed to do politics differently. Strange however, I don't recall at any time, not even once in the lead up to the election & platform, where they harped about there past experiences with the deficit or debt, or even where they promised to harp along on what was done by the Conservatives..... not once..... Here's a suggestion Mr. Legacy..... quit harping on what was done, and concentrate on what you plan on doing to remediate the situation.... That' would be a far more useful measure of your time and responsibility to all NB'ers. You can't change the past, but you can surely affect the future..... question is.... Will you ?

    • Reply by Edward Armstrong.

    If anyone expected anything different, they're ill informed. It happens every time the Government changes, usually followed by the quote, "But we had no idea it was this bad..."

 
 
 
 
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment