David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
YO
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/04/how-liberal-tide-turned-against-julian.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a2PMvx8HZW0
https://www.cbc.ca/radio/day6/assange-arrested-the-brexit-whistleblower-game-of-thrones-composer-celebrating-fan-fiction-and-more-1.5092753/the-lawyer-who-defended-the-pentagon-papers-publication-says-it-s-time-to-stand-up-for-julian-assange-1.5092761
Day 6
The lawyer who defended the Pentagon Papers' publication says it's time to stand up for Julian Assange
James Goodale says if Assange is indicted, it will threaten national security reporting
When Julian Assange was dragged out of his
seven-year long asylum inside Ecuador's embassy by London police, it
marked the beginning of a new chapter in his controversial career as a
media disruptor and a man who is badly wanted by U.S. authorities.
The U.S. Department of Justice wants to extradite Assange on conspiracy charges related to one of the largest ever leaks of government secrets.
Assange founded Wikileaks in 2006 and promised to obtain and publish confidential documents for the whole world to see. In 2010, Wikileaks made headlines when it released footage of a U.S. helicopter gunship killing civilians in Iraq.
That release led to the arrest of former U.S. Army intelligence analyst-turned-whistleblower Chelsea Manning who had given Wikileaks hundreds of thousands of confidential videos and diplomatic cables.
This
image captured from a classified U.S. military video footage shows
Iraqis being shot from an U.S. Apache helicopter that killed a dozen
people in Baghdad, including two Reuters news staff on July 12, 2007,
and released to Reuters on April 5, 2010 by WikiLeaks. (Wikileaks Handout/Reuters)
Assange's
lawyer has promised to fight the U.S. extradition request saying it
would set a dangerous precedent for journalists the world over — and James Goodale agrees.
As a first amendment lawyer, Goodale defended the New York Times in the historic 1971 Pentagon Papers case and wrote about his experiences in Harper's Magazine. He tells Day 6 host Brent Bambury that he sees parallels between the two cases.
Here is part of that conversation.
You have said that this effort to prosecute Julian Assange in the United States is more dangerous to freedom of the press than everything Donald Trump has ever tweeted about the media. Why?
First of all I wanted to make a joke, and secondly I wanted to point out that the prosecution of a reporter — and let's assume for a moment that Assange is a reporter — under a theory of conspiracy would be the first time that's ever happened in this country.
And, therefore, if it becomes a precedent it is much more dangerous than anything Donald Trump has done.
What was the case that the Nixon White House tried to make against the New York Times and does it resemble the case that the Department of Justice is trying to make right now?
It does resemble it. The Times was subject to being stopped from publication —.that's different — but that's what that was all about, because they had archives of the Vietnam War and they were classified.
What is very comparable — in fact, identical — to this case is the subsequent action of the government to indict Neil Sheehan who is the reporter who broke the story.
And we were very concerned, as I'm concerned today, that the precedent of indicting a reporter in United States law would be a very, very bad precedent.
You
are arguing that Julian Assange should be classified as a journalist.
Are you prepared to say that Assange is as thorough or as rigorous as
the New York Times?
I really don't know. You know, if I were to guess I'd say not. But I don't think that's the point.
The point is: does he functionally carry out the role of a reporter? Reporters are like the rest of us. Some of us really work hard, some don't and some are in the middle.
Julian
Assange gestures from a police vehicle on his arrival at Westminster
Magistrates court on April 11, 2019 in London, England. (Jack Taylor/Getty Images)
But
why do you think so many journalists are reluctant to defend him on
this issue? You've written that journalists really don't agree with you
when you talk about Julian Assange being protected by the First
Amendment.
Well, in the first place they don't like Julian Assange. And they find being compared to him is insulting as to what they do because they think he's a dumpster.
In other words, he gets information from Chelsea Manning, as in this case, and then he just dumps it out without even trying to figure out whether it's good or bad and so forth and so on.
In fact, that's not what he did in this case.
Yeah. And by the way Assange has been very active and could be indicted, in theory, for a lot of things. But the only thing he was indicted [for] earlier this week was for his release of the Chelsea Manning leaks. That's all we're talking about.
The way he did it was: he made a deal with the New York Times, El País, Le Monde, [and] a German newspaper and magazine [Der Spiegel] to publish these leaks together.
And each of the publications to which I just referred ... he separately edited them, so clearly a journalistic enterprise in my view.
And subsequent to that, though, there have been other WikiLeaks releases that did not follow that model. So, that may explain, in part, the reason why journalists have described him as a dumper, as you said.
Well, the other thing that has happened is that he's been heavily involved in the Russian investigation here in the United States which is coming to fruition because it's in a report written by Robert Mueller.
And one expects that Mueller will say that he was in cahoots with the Russians with respect to information that had been leaked from the DNC — that's the [Democratic] National Committee.
We don't know what that is going to look like. It's not in this case however. So you may be right, they don't like what he's done subsequently.
Demonstrators protest the arrest of Julian Assange outside Westminster Magistrates Court on April 11, 2019 in London, England. (Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)
But
if the Mueller report was to find that Assange actually coordinated
with a foreign government about the timing of the release of the
Democratic Party e-mails, would you still argue that he's entitled to
protection as a journalist under the First Amendment?
First of all he is a journalist. And then the second question is: [is] he protected under the facts of that case?
The trouble with your question — and my answer — is we don't know exactly what he did. But it's very interesting that he was not indicted for that. And, by the way, that's a leak of confidential but not classified material.
This case we're talking about today is about the leak of classified material. And the Justice Department has been going bananas about the leaks of classified material ever since the Pentagon Papers almost 50 years ago.
I think it's very bad because it'll be the first time any journalist has been convicted for doing his job — if you will assume for a moment the jobs that journalists do are somewhat similar to Assange.
Therefore, do it once successfully, the government can do it a second time successfully.
We'll have a whole new relationship between the press and government with respect to leaks, where the government can come in anytime and indict reporters. I think it's pretty draconian and pretty awful.
Do you think the fact that in this case the target is Assange, who many people believe — journalists among them — is a flawed character, gives the Department of Justice a better chance of conviction?
Yes I do. Assange will have to convince the court that he is a journalist — and there may be doubters.
This is a good case for them. This is the best case they could possibly have.
This transcript has been edited for length and clarity. To hear the full interview with James Goodale, download our podcast or click 'Listen' at the top of this page.
The U.S. Department of Justice wants to extradite Assange on conspiracy charges related to one of the largest ever leaks of government secrets.
Assange founded Wikileaks in 2006 and promised to obtain and publish confidential documents for the whole world to see. In 2010, Wikileaks made headlines when it released footage of a U.S. helicopter gunship killing civilians in Iraq.
That release led to the arrest of former U.S. Army intelligence analyst-turned-whistleblower Chelsea Manning who had given Wikileaks hundreds of thousands of confidential videos and diplomatic cables.
As a first amendment lawyer, Goodale defended the New York Times in the historic 1971 Pentagon Papers case and wrote about his experiences in Harper's Magazine. He tells Day 6 host Brent Bambury that he sees parallels between the two cases.
Here is part of that conversation.
You have said that this effort to prosecute Julian Assange in the United States is more dangerous to freedom of the press than everything Donald Trump has ever tweeted about the media. Why?
First of all I wanted to make a joke, and secondly I wanted to point out that the prosecution of a reporter — and let's assume for a moment that Assange is a reporter — under a theory of conspiracy would be the first time that's ever happened in this country.
And, therefore, if it becomes a precedent it is much more dangerous than anything Donald Trump has done.
The precedent of indicting a reporter in United States law would be a very, very bad precedent.- James GoodaleI don't know if we can compare this to what happened in 1971 when you were in court defending the New York Times — that was when the Nixon administration tried to stop the Times from publishing classified Defense Department documents; the Pentagon Papers.
What was the case that the Nixon White House tried to make against the New York Times and does it resemble the case that the Department of Justice is trying to make right now?
It does resemble it. The Times was subject to being stopped from publication —.that's different — but that's what that was all about, because they had archives of the Vietnam War and they were classified.
What is very comparable — in fact, identical — to this case is the subsequent action of the government to indict Neil Sheehan who is the reporter who broke the story.
And we were very concerned, as I'm concerned today, that the precedent of indicting a reporter in United States law would be a very, very bad precedent.
I really don't know. You know, if I were to guess I'd say not. But I don't think that's the point.
The point is: does he functionally carry out the role of a reporter? Reporters are like the rest of us. Some of us really work hard, some don't and some are in the middle.
Well, in the first place they don't like Julian Assange. And they find being compared to him is insulting as to what they do because they think he's a dumpster.
In other words, he gets information from Chelsea Manning, as in this case, and then he just dumps it out without even trying to figure out whether it's good or bad and so forth and so on.
In fact, that's not what he did in this case.
The Justice Department has been going bananas about the leaks of classified material ever since the Pentagon Papers almost 50 years ago.- James GoodaleYou're talking about Chelsea Manning [and] the WikiLeaks cables?
Yeah. And by the way Assange has been very active and could be indicted, in theory, for a lot of things. But the only thing he was indicted [for] earlier this week was for his release of the Chelsea Manning leaks. That's all we're talking about.
The way he did it was: he made a deal with the New York Times, El País, Le Monde, [and] a German newspaper and magazine [Der Spiegel] to publish these leaks together.
And each of the publications to which I just referred ... he separately edited them, so clearly a journalistic enterprise in my view.
And subsequent to that, though, there have been other WikiLeaks releases that did not follow that model. So, that may explain, in part, the reason why journalists have described him as a dumper, as you said.
Well, the other thing that has happened is that he's been heavily involved in the Russian investigation here in the United States which is coming to fruition because it's in a report written by Robert Mueller.
And one expects that Mueller will say that he was in cahoots with the Russians with respect to information that had been leaked from the DNC — that's the [Democratic] National Committee.
We don't know what that is going to look like. It's not in this case however. So you may be right, they don't like what he's done subsequently.
First of all he is a journalist. And then the second question is: [is] he protected under the facts of that case?
The trouble with your question — and my answer — is we don't know exactly what he did. But it's very interesting that he was not indicted for that. And, by the way, that's a leak of confidential but not classified material.
This case we're talking about today is about the leak of classified material. And the Justice Department has been going bananas about the leaks of classified material ever since the Pentagon Papers almost 50 years ago.
We'll have a whole new relationship between the press and government ... where the government can come in any time and indict reporters.- James GoodaleSo, 50 years later — with the Assange case — if the U.S. Justice Department gets a conviction here, what are the consequences for journalism?
I think it's very bad because it'll be the first time any journalist has been convicted for doing his job — if you will assume for a moment the jobs that journalists do are somewhat similar to Assange.
Therefore, do it once successfully, the government can do it a second time successfully.
We'll have a whole new relationship between the press and government with respect to leaks, where the government can come in anytime and indict reporters. I think it's pretty draconian and pretty awful.
Do you think the fact that in this case the target is Assange, who many people believe — journalists among them — is a flawed character, gives the Department of Justice a better chance of conviction?
Yes I do. Assange will have to convince the court that he is a journalist — and there may be doubters.
This is a good case for them. This is the best case they could possibly have.
This transcript has been edited for length and clarity. To hear the full interview with James Goodale, download our podcast or click 'Listen' at the top of this page.
57 Commentts
David R. Amos
Content disabled
Does anyone remember this email Assange sent me in 2010 before he became world famous???
The Ides of March 2010 for Al Jazeera Iceland WikiLeaks Zionists vs Mean Old Me
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a2PMvx8HZW0
From: "David Amos"
To: "Julian Assange)"
Cc:"Dan Fitzgerald" danf@danf.net Byrne.G@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:35 PM
Subject: Re: Al Jazeera on Iceland's new plan Thanx Here is something
about Iceland and Banksters Al Jazeera would enjoy
Checkout this old pdf file from 2005 at about page two or three
https://www.scribd.com/doc/4304560/Speaker-Iceland-etc
Then read on and chuckle
From: "Julian Assange)" editor@wikileaks.org
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 3:15 PM
Subject: Al Jazeera on Iceland's plan for a press safe haven
FYI: Al-Jazeera's take on Iceland's proposed media safe haven
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbGiPj...
More info http://immi.is/
Julian Assange
Editor
WikiLeaks
http://wikileaks.org//
From: postur@fjr.stjr.is
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 15:06:39 +0000
Subject: Re: RE: Iceland and Bankers etc I must ask the obvious
question. Why have you people ignored me for three years?
To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Dear David Amos
Unfortunately there has been a considerable delay in responding to
incoming letters due to heavy workload and many inquiries to our office.
We appreciate the issue raised in your letter. We have set up a web site
www.iceland.org where we have gathered various practical information
regarding the economic crisis in Iceland.
Greetings from the Ministry of Finance.
Tilvísun í mál: FJR08100024
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:38:25 -0400
Subject: Re: Attn James Goodale RE Your opinions aired on CBC this
weekend about Assange I just called and talked to your assistant Correct?
To: jcgoodal@debevoise.com, jakierna@debevoise.com,
news-tips@nytimes.com, froomkin@whitehousewatch.com, dan@froomkin.com,
mdcohen212@gmail.com, j.robinson@doughtystreet.co.uk
rfife@globeandmail.com, Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
Jane.Philpott@parl.gc.ca, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca,
Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca, theresa.may.mp@parliament.uk,
mayt@parliament.uk, pm@pm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
Zachary.terwilliger@usdoj.gov, tracy.mccormick@usdoj.gov,
joshua.stueve@usdoj.gov, william.barr@usdoj.gov,
Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, bpollack@robbinsrussell.com
Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Newsroom@globeandmail.com, news@dailygleaner.com,
news@kingscorecord.com;
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 14:38:33 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn James Goodale RE Your opinions aired on
CBC this weekend about Assange Perhaps we should talk
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
message will be carefully reviewed.
To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
Thank you
-------------------
Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
Vancouver Granville.
Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
votre adresse et votre code postal.
Merci
On 4/15/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://www.cbc.ca/radio/day6/
>
>
> The lawyer who defended the Pentagon Papers' publication says it's
> time to stand up for Julian Assange
>
> James Goodale says if Assange is indicted, it will threaten national
> security reporting
> CBC Radio · Posted: Apr 12, 2019 6:10 PM ET | Last Updated: April 13
>
> James C. Goodale
> Debevoise & Plimpton
> 919 Third Avenue
> New York, NY 10022
>
> Tel: 212 909 6253
> Fax: 212 909 6836
> jcgoodal@debevoise.com
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 15:53:36 -0400
> Subject: YO Norman Eisen Re My calls today about your lack of ethics
> To: Norman.Eisen@gmail.com, info@citizensforethics.org,
> jakierna@debevoise.com, NEisen@brookings.edu,
> BFinzen@robinskaplan.com, jdunbar@publicintegrity.org,
> jbennett@publicintegrity.org, tips@publicintegrity.org
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <stateofcorruptionnh1@gmail.
> <mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov>, George J Russell TIGTA
> <j.Russell.George@tigta.treas.
>
> CREW
> 455 Massachusetts Avenue NW,
> Washington, DC 20001
> info@citizensforethics.org
> 202-408-5565
>
> Norman L. Eisen (born November 11, 1960[2]) is board chair of Citizens
> for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW).[3] He is an
> attorney who previously served as White House Special Counsel for
> Ethics and Government Reform and later United States Ambassador to the
> Czech Republic. He is also a senior fellow in Governance Studies at
> the Brookings Institution.[4]
>
> https://www.brookings.edu/wp-
>
> AMBASSADOR (ret.)
> NORMAN L. EISEN
> The Brookings Institution
> 1775 Mass. Ave. NW
> Washington, DC 20036
> (202) 238-3178
> NEisen@Brookings.edu
> Norman.Eisen@gmail.com
>
> https://www.publicintegrity.
>
> The Center for Public Integrity
> 910 17th Street, NW, Suite 700
> Washington, DC 20006
>
> Story tip-offs: tips@publicintegrity.org or 202-466-1300
>
> James A. Kiernan III
> Of Counsel
> jakierna@debevoise.com,
> Tel: +44 20 7786 9044
>
> Bruce A. Finzen
> Of Counsel
> BFinzen@RobinsKaplan.com
> 612.349.8459
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2017 10:35:00 -0400
> Subject: Fwd: Re My calls today about the Montreal Economic Institute
> To: contact@icij.org, s.bowers00@gmail.com, tom@tomstites.com
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <harvey.cashore@cbc.ca>
>
> http://www.canadalandshow.com/
>
> Gerard Ryle is the director of the International Consortium of
> Investigative Journalists, who are behind the Paradise Papers, the
> Panama Papers and other similar investigations.
>
> Major revelations are continuing to come out of the Paradise Papers in
> Canada and around the world.
>
> One prominent columnist dismissed the whole thing as “another cheap
> shot at the wealthy,” while other people are asking why this story
> isn’t causing riots in the streets.
>
> https://www.icij.org/
>
> Simon Bowers has been a reporter for the ICIJ on its Paradise Papers
> project.
>
> He was previously senior financial reporter, specializing in
> investigations, for The Guardian newspaper, where he worked for almost
> 20 years. Topics he has covered include generic medicine price-fixing
> cartels, the laundering of gold linked to war lords, Big Oil pledges
> on climate change and the Icelandic banking bubble.
>
> Bowers has helped exposed tax evasion and avoidance strategies that
> have cost governments billions of dollars in lost taxes. He has spent
> many years on the trail of white collar criminals.
>
> He was involved in other ICIJ projects including Luxleaks and Panama
> Papers.
>
> http://banyanproject.coop/
>
> Tom Stites
>
> Tom is founder and president of the Banyan Project, which aims to
> strengthen democracy by pioneering a sustainable and easily replicable
> new model for Web journalism. Banyan’s mission is to help seed
> independent news co-ops in underserved communities across the nation
> and to provide them with mentorship and educational and administrative
> support so they can thrive and fulfill their mission of civic
> engagement.
>
> Tom shaped Banyan's distinctive co-op business model as a fellow of
> the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard; he is now
> working with community leaders in Haverhill, Mass., to launch a pilot
> site. He also chairs the Banyan Project Inc. Board of Directors.
>
> Tom is a seasoned editor and entrepreneur with a passion for
> strengthening journalism and democracy. As an editor he has supervised
> reporting that has won an array of major journalism awards including
> two Pulitzer Prizes; as an entrepreneur he has been the founding
> publisher of two print magazines and three Web publications in
> addition to Banyan. His writings and speeches on strengthening
> democracy and on journalism have won a respectful following.
>
> Positions Tom has held include national correspondent, national
> editor, and associate managing editor for project reporting at The
> Chicago Tribune; night national editor of The New York Times, and
> managing editor of The Kansas City Times. He later served for a decade
> as the editor and publisher of UU World, the national magazine of the
> Unitarian Universalist religious denomination, then as a consulting
> editor for the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists.
>
> Tom grew up in Kansas City and attended Williams College. He has
> taught in the Graduate School of Public Policy at the University of
> Chicago and conducted seminars at several journalism schools. In 2006
> he was a Resident Fellow at Harvard Divinity School, where did
> research on power and the conscience. See Tom’s full resume. Contact
> him at tom@tomstites.com.
>
>
> Paul E. Kritzer
>
> Paul Kritzer, a lawyer in private practice, was for 24 years vice
> president, corporate secretary and general counsel of Journal
> Communications Inc. in Milwaukee, which owned The Milwaukee Journal
> Sentinel, 45 community newspapers, 9 television and 35 radio stations,
> and commercial printing, direct mail and telecommunications
> subsidiaries. His journalism career began with reporting and copy
> editing positions, and after law school and experience in Capitol Hill
> as aide to a member of Congress and assistant counsel of a House
> committee, he was editor and publisher of a 26,000-circulation daily
> newspaper in Waukesha, Wisconsin. Paul has degrees from Williams
> College, the Columbia University School of Journalism, and Georgetown
> Law School. He is secretary of the Banyan Project Inc. and a member of
> its Board of Directors.
>
> http://www.waukesha-wi.gov/
>
> Paul E Kritzer
> 211 Oxford Rd
> Waukesha, WI 53186
> Phone: (262) 548-9666
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 13:22:37 -0400
> Subject: Re My calls today about the Montreal Economic Institute
> To: ksb@stowers.org, mclean@donner.ca, tuz@chaseinv.com,
> derwood@chaseinv.com, oig <oig@sec.gov>, mgelowitz@osler.com,
> mkellygagnon@iedm.org
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>
>
> http://business.financialpost.
>
> "Although he would not disclose the individual names of any donors, tax
> returns show that MEI has received funding from the Stowers Institute
> for Medical Research, the Donner Canadian Foundation and The Chase
> Foundation of Virginia."
>
> https://www.stowers.org/media
>
> Kimberly Bland, Ph.D.
> Head, Science Communications
> 816.926.4015 - Office
> 816.392.8428 - Mobile
> ksb@stowers.org
>
> http://www.donnerfoundation.
>
> Helen McLean Executive Director
> Donner Canadian Foundation
> 8 Prince Arthur Avenue, 3rd Floor
> Toronto, ON M5R 1A9
> Telephone: 416-920-6400
>
> http://www.managerreview.com/
>
> Mr. Derwood Chase
> President/CEO
> Tel : 434-293-9104
> Email: derwood@chaseinv.com
>
> Mr. Chase earned a BS with Distinction from the University of Virginia
> and a MBA from Harvard University. His speeches, articles and comments
> on investing and economic policy have been quoted in Barron’s,
> Business Week, The Wall Street Journal, Pensions & Investments,
> Kiplinger’s Personal Finance, and The New York Times. He has appeared
> on CNBC, The Nightly Business Report (PBS) and Bloomberg. Derwood is a
> Chartered Investment Counselor, a member of the Analysts Club
> (N.Y.C.), the New York Society of Security Analysts, and the Mont
> Pelerin Society. He is President of the Chase Foundation of Virginia,
> a Trustee of the Reason Foundation and the Fraser Institute, and a
> former Governor of the Investment Counsel Association of America.
>
> Mr. Peter Tuz
> Researcher/Analyst
> Tel : 434-293-9104
> Email: tuz@chaseinv.com
>
> Mr. Tuz earned his BA from Ripon College, a MA from the University of
> Missouri, and a MBA from Tulane University. Peter is a CFA charter
> holder. Before joining us in 1997 he had 10 years experience as a
> senior analyst and officer with two NYSE member firms. He serves as a
> trustee for Ripon College where he is a member of its investment
> committee. Peter is a member of CFA Virginia, CFA Society of
> Washington, D.C., the Washington Association of Money Managers and
> serves on the Investment Company Institute’s small funds committee. He
> has been an occasional guest on CNBC and The Street and serves on the
> board of CFA Virginia. He has been quoted in Barron’s, the Wall Street
> Journal, the New York Times and other publications.
>
> Chase Investment Counsel Corporation
> 350 Old Ivy Way, Suite 100
> Charlottesville, Virginia 22903-4897
> United States
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Good Day Sir
>>
>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>
>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>
>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>> suggested that you study closely.
>>
>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>
>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>
>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>>
>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>>
>> April 3rd, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/
>>
>>
>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>
>>
>> The only hearing thus far
>>
>> May 24th, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/
>>
>>
>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>
>> Date: 20151223
>>
>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>
>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>
>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>
>> Plaintiff
>>
>> and
>>
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>> Defendant
>>
>> ORDER
>>
>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>> December 14, 2015)
>>
>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>> in its entirety.
>>
>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>> he stated:
>>
>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>
>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>> Police.
>>
>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>
>>
>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>> is no order as to costs.
>>
>> “B. Richard Bell”
>> Judge
>>
>>
>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>
>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>
>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>> most
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>> dudes are way past too late
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Merci ,
>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>
>>
>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>
>> January 13, 2015
>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>
>> December 8, 2014
>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>
>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>
>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>
>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>> campaign of 2006.
>>
>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>
>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>
>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>
>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>
>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>
>> Subject:
>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>
>> January 30, 2007
>>
>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>
>> Mr. David Amos
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>
>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>
>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>> Minister of Health
>>
>> CM/cb
>>
>>
>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>
>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>
>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>
>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>
>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>
>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>> Traffic Services NCO
>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>>
>>
>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>> fax: 506-444-5224
>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:35 AM
>> Subject: RE My complaint against the CROWN in Federal Court Attn David
>> Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to submit a motion for a
>> publication ban on my complaint trust that you dudes are way past too
>> late
>> To: David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca, peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca
>> peacock.kurt@telegraphjournal.
>> david.akin@sunmedia.ca, robert.frater@justice.gc.ca,
>> paul.riley@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca,
>> greg@gregdelbigio.com, joyce.dewitt-vanoosten@gov.bc.
>> joan.barrett@ontario.ca, jean-vincent.lacroix@gouv.qc.
>> peter.rogers@mcinnescooper.com
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, gopublic@cbc.ca,
>> Whistleblower@ctv.ca
>>
>> https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-
>>
>> http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/
>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.
>>
>> I repeat what the Hell do I do with the Yankee wiretapes taps sell
>> them on Ebay or listen to them and argue them with you dudes in
>> Feferal Court?
>>
>> Petey Baby loses all parliamentary privelges in less than a month but
>> he still supposed to be an ethical officer of the Court CORRECT?
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:10:14 -0400
>> Subject: Yo Mr Bauer say hey to your client Obama and his buddies in
>> the USDOJ for me will ya?
>> To: RBauer@perkinscoie.com, sshimshak@paulweiss.com,
>> cspada@lswlaw.com, msmith@svlaw.com, bginsberg@pattonboggs.com,
>> gregory.craig@skadden.com, pm@pm.gc.ca, bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca
>> Cc: alevine@cooley.com, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
>> michael.rothfeld@wsj.com, remery@ecbalaw.com
>>
>> QSLS Politics
>> By Location Visit Detail
>> Visit 29,419
>> Domain Name usdoj.gov ? (U.S. Government)
>> IP Address 149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice)
>> ISP US Dept of Justice
>> Location Continent : North America
>> Country : United States (Facts)
>> State : District of Columbia
>> City : Washington
>> Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
>> Language English (U.S.) en-us
>> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
>> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
>> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
>> CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2;
>> DI60SP1001)
>> Javascript version 1.3
>> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
>> Color Depth : 32 bits
>> Time of Visit Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
>> Last Page View Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
>> Visit Length 0 seconds
>> Page Views 1
>> Referring URL http://www.google.co...
>> Search Engine google.com
>> Search Words david amos bernie madoff
>> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-
>> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-
>> Out Click
>> Time Zone UTC-5:00
>> Visitor's Time Nov 17 2012 12:33:08 pm
>> Visit Number 29,419
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>>
>>
>> Could ya tell I am investigating your pension plan bigtime? Its
>> because no member of the RCMP I have ever encountered has earned it yet
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:36:04 -0400
>> Subject: This is a brief as I can make my concerns Randy
>> To: randyedmunds@gov.nl.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> In a nutshell my concerns about the actions of the Investment Industry
>> affect the interests of every person in every district of every
>> country not just the USA and Canada. I was offering to help you with
>> Emera because my work with them and Danny Williams is well known and
>> some of it is over eight years old and in the PUBLIC Record.
>>
>> All you have to do is stand in the Legislature and ask the MInister of
>> Justice why I have been invited to sue Newfoundland by the
>> Conservatives
>>
>>
>> Obviously I am the guy the USDOJ and the SEC would not name who is the
>> link to Madoff and Putnam Investments
>>
>> Here is why
>>
>> http://banking.senate.gov/
>>
>> Notice the transcripts and webcasts of the hearing of the US Senate
>> Banking Commitee are still missing? Mr Emory should at least notice
>> Eliot Spitzer and the Dates around November 20th, 2003 in the
>> following file
>>
>> http://www.checktheevidence.
>>
>> http://occupywallst.org/users/
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Hansen, David" David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca
>> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 19:28:44 +0000
>> Subject: RE: I just called again Mr Hansen
>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Hello Mr. Amos,
>>
>> I manage the Justice Canada civil litigation section in the Atlantic
>> region. We are only responsible for litigating existing civil
>> litigation files in which the Attorney General of Canada is a named
>> defendant or plaintiff. If you are a plaintiff or defendant in an
>> existing civil litigation matter in the Atlantic region in which
>> Attorney General of Canada is a named defendant or plaintiff please
>> provide the court file number, the names of the parties in the action
>> and your question. I am not the appropriate contact for other
>> matters.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> David A. Hansen
>> Regional Director | Directeur régional
>> General Counsel |Avocat général
>> Civil Litigation and Advisory | Contentieux des affaires civiles et
>> services de consultation
>> Department of Justice | Ministère de la Justice
>> Suite 1400 – Duke Tower | Pièce 1400 – Tour Duke
>> 5251 Duke Street | 5251 rue Duke
>> Halifax, Nova Scotia | Halifax, Nouvelle- Écosse
>> B3J 1P3
>> david.hansen@justice.gc.ca
>> Telephone | Téléphone (902) 426-3261 / Facsimile | Télécopieur (902)
>> 426-2329
>> This e-mail is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client
>> privilege. Unauthorized distribution or disclosure is prohibited. If
>> you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us and delete
>> this entire e-mail.
>> Before printing think about the Environment
>> Thinking Green, please do not print this e-mail unless necessary.
>> Pensez vert, svp imprimez que si nécessaire.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:23:24 -0300
>>> Subject: ATTN FBI Special Agent Richard Deslauriers Have you talked to
>>> your buddies Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly about the wiretap tapes YET?
>>> To: boston@ic.fbi.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
>>> bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov,
>>> jcarney@carneybassil.com, bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, birgittaj@althingi.is,
>>> shmurphy@globe.com, redicecreations@gmail.com
>>>
>>> FBI Boston
>>> One Center Plaza
>>> Suite 600
>>> Boston, MA 02108
>>> Phone: (617) 742-5533
>>> Fax: (617) 223-6327
>>> E-mail: Boston@ic.fbi.gov
>>>
>>> Hours
>>> Although we operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, our normal
>>> "walk-in" business hours are from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
>>> through Friday. If you need to speak with a FBI representative at any
>>> time other than during normal business hours, please telephone our
>>> office at (617) 742-5533.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300
>>> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is
>>> finally underway now correct? What the hell do I do with the wiretap
>>> tapes Sell them on Ebay?
>>> To: Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov,
>>> Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney@carneybassil.com,
>>> bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, wolfheartlodge@live.com, shmurphy@globe.com,
>>> >> jonathan.albano@bingham.com, mvalencia@globe.com
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>>> PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov, rounappletree@aol.com
>>>
>>> http://www.bostonglobe.com/
>>>
>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>>
>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask
>>> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>
>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>> cards?
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>> United States Senate
>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>
>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>> tapes.
>>>
>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>
>>> Very truly yours,
>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "David Amos" david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>> To: "Rob Talach" rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing
>>> the Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why
>>>
>>> The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should mean
>>> a lot to you
>>>
>>> http://www.checktheevidence.
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:37:08 -0400
>>> Subject: To Hell with the KILLER COP Gilles Moreau What say you NOW
>>> Bernadine Chapman??
>>> To: Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, phil.giles@statcan.ca,
>>> maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca, Jennifer.Nixon@ps-sp.gc.ca,
>>> bartman.heidi@psic-ispc.gc.ca, Yves.J.Marineau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> david.paradiso@erc-cee.gc.ca, desaulniea@smtp.gc.ca,
>>> denise.brennan@tbs-sct.gc.ca, anne.murtha@vac-acc.gc.ca,
>>> webo@xplornet.com, julie.dickson@osfi-bsif.gc.ca,
>>> rod.giles@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, toewsv1@parl.gc.ca,
>>> Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca,Cleme
>>> >> oig@sec.gov, whistleblower@finra.org, whistle@fsa.gov.uk,
>>> david@fairwhistleblower.ca
>>> Cc: j.kroes@interpol.int, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
>>> bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.
>>> Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>>> Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca,
>>> ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>>
>>> http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/nb/
>>>
>>> http://nb.rcmpvet.ca/
>>>
>>> From: Gilles Moreau Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:03:22 -0500
>>> Subject: Re: Lets ee if the really nasty Newfy Lawyer Danny Boy
>>> Millions will explain this email to you or your boss Vic Toews EH
>>> Constable Peddle???
>>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Please cease and desist from using my name in your emails.
>>>
>>> Gilles Moreau, Chief Superintendent, CHRP and ACC
>>> Director General
>>> HR Transformation
>>> 73 Leikin Drive, M5-2-502
>>> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2
>>>
>>> Tel 613-843-6039
>>> Cel 613-818-6947
>>>
>>> Gilles Moreau, surintendant principal, CRHA et ACC
>>> Directeur général de la Transformation des ressources humaines
>>> 73 Leikin, pièce M5-2-502
>>> Ottawa, ON K1A 0R2
>>>
>>> tél 613-843-6039
>>> cel 613-818-6947
>>> gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:38:25 -0400
Subject: Re: Attn James Goodale RE Your opinions aired on CBC this
weekend about Assange I just called and talked to your assistant Correct?
To: jcgoodal@debevoise.com, jakierna@debevoise.com,
news-tips@nytimes.com, froomkin@whitehousewatch.com, dan@froomkin.com,
mdcohen212@gmail.com, j.robinson@doughtystreet.co.uk
rfife@globeandmail.com, Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
Jane.Philpott@parl.gc.ca, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca,
Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca, theresa.may.mp@parliament.uk,
mayt@parliament.uk, pm@pm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
Zachary.terwilliger@usdoj.gov, tracy.mccormick@usdoj.gov,
joshua.stueve@usdoj.gov, william.barr@usdoj.gov,
Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, bpollack@robbinsrussell.com
Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Newsroom@globeandmail.com, news@dailygleaner.com,
news@kingscorecord.com;
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 14:38:33 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn James Goodale RE Your opinions aired on
CBC this weekend about Assange Perhaps we should talk
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
message will be carefully reviewed.
To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
Thank you
-------------------
Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
Vancouver Granville.
Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
votre adresse et votre code postal.
Merci
On 4/15/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://www.cbc.ca/radio/day6/
>
>
> The lawyer who defended the Pentagon Papers' publication says it's
> time to stand up for Julian Assange
>
> James Goodale says if Assange is indicted, it will threaten national
> security reporting
> CBC Radio · Posted: Apr 12, 2019 6:10 PM ET | Last Updated: April 13
>
> James C. Goodale
> Debevoise & Plimpton
> 919 Third Avenue
> New York, NY 10022
>
> Tel: 212 909 6253
> Fax: 212 909 6836
> jcgoodal@debevoise.com
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 15:53:36 -0400
> Subject: YO Norman Eisen Re My calls today about your lack of ethics
> To: Norman.Eisen@gmail.com, info@citizensforethics.org,
> jakierna@debevoise.com, NEisen@brookings.edu,
> BFinzen@robinskaplan.com, jdunbar@publicintegrity.org,
> jbennett@publicintegrity.org, tips@publicintegrity.org
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <stateofcorruptionnh1@gmail.
> <mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov>, George J Russell TIGTA
> <j.Russell.George@tigta.treas.
>
> CREW
> 455 Massachusetts Avenue NW,
> Washington, DC 20001
> info@citizensforethics.org
> 202-408-5565
>
> Norman L. Eisen (born November 11, 1960[2]) is board chair of Citizens
> for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW).[3] He is an
> attorney who previously served as White House Special Counsel for
> Ethics and Government Reform and later United States Ambassador to the
> Czech Republic. He is also a senior fellow in Governance Studies at
> the Brookings Institution.[4]
>
> https://www.brookings.edu/wp-
>
> AMBASSADOR (ret.)
> NORMAN L. EISEN
> The Brookings Institution
> 1775 Mass. Ave. NW
> Washington, DC 20036
> (202) 238-3178
> NEisen@Brookings.edu
> Norman.Eisen@gmail.com
>
> https://www.publicintegrity.
>
> The Center for Public Integrity
> 910 17th Street, NW, Suite 700
> Washington, DC 20006
>
> Story tip-offs: tips@publicintegrity.org or 202-466-1300
>
> James A. Kiernan III
> Of Counsel
> jakierna@debevoise.com,
> Tel: +44 20 7786 9044
>
> Bruce A. Finzen
> Of Counsel
> BFinzen@RobinsKaplan.com
> 612.349.8459
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2017 10:35:00 -0400
> Subject: Fwd: Re My calls today about the Montreal Economic Institute
> To: contact@icij.org, s.bowers00@gmail.com, tom@tomstites.com
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <harvey.cashore@cbc.ca>
>
> http://www.canadalandshow.com/
>
> Gerard Ryle is the director of the International Consortium of
> Investigative Journalists, who are behind the Paradise Papers, the
> Panama Papers and other similar investigations.
>
> Major revelations are continuing to come out of the Paradise Papers in
> Canada and around the world.
>
> One prominent columnist dismissed the whole thing as “another cheap
> shot at the wealthy,” while other people are asking why this story
> isn’t causing riots in the streets.
>
> https://www.icij.org/
>
> Simon Bowers has been a reporter for the ICIJ on its Paradise Papers
> project.
>
> He was previously senior financial reporter, specializing in
> investigations, for The Guardian newspaper, where he worked for almost
> 20 years. Topics he has covered include generic medicine price-fixing
> cartels, the laundering of gold linked to war lords, Big Oil pledges
> on climate change and the Icelandic banking bubble.
>
> Bowers has helped exposed tax evasion and avoidance strategies that
> have cost governments billions of dollars in lost taxes. He has spent
> many years on the trail of white collar criminals.
>
> He was involved in other ICIJ projects including Luxleaks and Panama
> Papers.
>
> http://banyanproject.coop/
>
> Tom Stites
>
> Tom is founder and president of the Banyan Project, which aims to
> strengthen democracy by pioneering a sustainable and easily replicable
> new model for Web journalism. Banyan’s mission is to help seed
> independent news co-ops in underserved communities across the nation
> and to provide them with mentorship and educational and administrative
> support so they can thrive and fulfill their mission of civic
> engagement.
>
> Tom shaped Banyan's distinctive co-op business model as a fellow of
> the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard; he is now
> working with community leaders in Haverhill, Mass., to launch a pilot
> site. He also chairs the Banyan Project Inc. Board of Directors.
>
> Tom is a seasoned editor and entrepreneur with a passion for
> strengthening journalism and democracy. As an editor he has supervised
> reporting that has won an array of major journalism awards including
> two Pulitzer Prizes; as an entrepreneur he has been the founding
> publisher of two print magazines and three Web publications in
> addition to Banyan. His writings and speeches on strengthening
> democracy and on journalism have won a respectful following.
>
> Positions Tom has held include national correspondent, national
> editor, and associate managing editor for project reporting at The
> Chicago Tribune; night national editor of The New York Times, and
> managing editor of The Kansas City Times. He later served for a decade
> as the editor and publisher of UU World, the national magazine of the
> Unitarian Universalist religious denomination, then as a consulting
> editor for the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists.
>
> Tom grew up in Kansas City and attended Williams College. He has
> taught in the Graduate School of Public Policy at the University of
> Chicago and conducted seminars at several journalism schools. In 2006
> he was a Resident Fellow at Harvard Divinity School, where did
> research on power and the conscience. See Tom’s full resume. Contact
> him at tom@tomstites.com.
>
>
> Paul E. Kritzer
>
> Paul Kritzer, a lawyer in private practice, was for 24 years vice
> president, corporate secretary and general counsel of Journal
> Communications Inc. in Milwaukee, which owned The Milwaukee Journal
> Sentinel, 45 community newspapers, 9 television and 35 radio stations,
> and commercial printing, direct mail and telecommunications
> subsidiaries. His journalism career began with reporting and copy
> editing positions, and after law school and experience in Capitol Hill
> as aide to a member of Congress and assistant counsel of a House
> committee, he was editor and publisher of a 26,000-circulation daily
> newspaper in Waukesha, Wisconsin. Paul has degrees from Williams
> College, the Columbia University School of Journalism, and Georgetown
> Law School. He is secretary of the Banyan Project Inc. and a member of
> its Board of Directors.
>
> http://www.waukesha-wi.gov/
>
> Paul E Kritzer
> 211 Oxford Rd
> Waukesha, WI 53186
> Phone: (262) 548-9666
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 13:22:37 -0400
> Subject: Re My calls today about the Montreal Economic Institute
> To: ksb@stowers.org, mclean@donner.ca, tuz@chaseinv.com,
> derwood@chaseinv.com, oig <oig@sec.gov>, mgelowitz@osler.com,
> mkellygagnon@iedm.org
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>
>
> http://business.financialpost.
>
> "Although he would not disclose the individual names of any donors, tax
> returns show that MEI has received funding from the Stowers Institute
> for Medical Research, the Donner Canadian Foundation and The Chase
> Foundation of Virginia."
>
> https://www.stowers.org/media
>
> Kimberly Bland, Ph.D.
> Head, Science Communications
> 816.926.4015 - Office
> 816.392.8428 - Mobile
> ksb@stowers.org
>
> http://www.donnerfoundation.
>
> Helen McLean Executive Director
> Donner Canadian Foundation
> 8 Prince Arthur Avenue, 3rd Floor
> Toronto, ON M5R 1A9
> Telephone: 416-920-6400
>
> http://www.managerreview.com/
>
> Mr. Derwood Chase
> President/CEO
> Tel : 434-293-9104
> Email: derwood@chaseinv.com
>
> Mr. Chase earned a BS with Distinction from the University of Virginia
> and a MBA from Harvard University. His speeches, articles and comments
> on investing and economic policy have been quoted in Barron’s,
> Business Week, The Wall Street Journal, Pensions & Investments,
> Kiplinger’s Personal Finance, and The New York Times. He has appeared
> on CNBC, The Nightly Business Report (PBS) and Bloomberg. Derwood is a
> Chartered Investment Counselor, a member of the Analysts Club
> (N.Y.C.), the New York Society of Security Analysts, and the Mont
> Pelerin Society. He is President of the Chase Foundation of Virginia,
> a Trustee of the Reason Foundation and the Fraser Institute, and a
> former Governor of the Investment Counsel Association of America.
>
> Mr. Peter Tuz
> Researcher/Analyst
> Tel : 434-293-9104
> Email: tuz@chaseinv.com
>
> Mr. Tuz earned his BA from Ripon College, a MA from the University of
> Missouri, and a MBA from Tulane University. Peter is a CFA charter
> holder. Before joining us in 1997 he had 10 years experience as a
> senior analyst and officer with two NYSE member firms. He serves as a
> trustee for Ripon College where he is a member of its investment
> committee. Peter is a member of CFA Virginia, CFA Society of
> Washington, D.C., the Washington Association of Money Managers and
> serves on the Investment Company Institute’s small funds committee. He
> has been an occasional guest on CNBC and The Street and serves on the
> board of CFA Virginia. He has been quoted in Barron’s, the Wall Street
> Journal, the New York Times and other publications.
>
> Chase Investment Counsel Corporation
> 350 Old Ivy Way, Suite 100
> Charlottesville, Virginia 22903-4897
> United States
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Good Day Sir
>>
>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>
>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>
>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>> suggested that you study closely.
>>
>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>
>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>
>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>>
>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>>
>> April 3rd, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/
>>
>>
>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>
>>
>> The only hearing thus far
>>
>> May 24th, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/
>>
>>
>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>
>> Date: 20151223
>>
>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>
>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>
>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>
>> Plaintiff
>>
>> and
>>
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>> Defendant
>>
>> ORDER
>>
>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>> December 14, 2015)
>>
>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>> in its entirety.
>>
>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>> he stated:
>>
>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>
>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>> Police.
>>
>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>
>>
>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>> is no order as to costs.
>>
>> “B. Richard Bell”
>> Judge
>>
>>
>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>
>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>
>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>> most
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>> dudes are way past too late
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Merci ,
>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>
>>
>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>
>> January 13, 2015
>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>
>> December 8, 2014
>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>
>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>
>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>
>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>> campaign of 2006.
>>
>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>
>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>
>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>
>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>
>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>
>> Subject:
>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>
>> January 30, 2007
>>
>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>
>> Mr. David Amos
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>
>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>
>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>> Minister of Health
>>
>> CM/cb
>>
>>
>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>
>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>
>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>
>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>
>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>
>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>> Traffic Services NCO
>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>>
>>
>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>> fax: 506-444-5224
>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:35 AM
>> Subject: RE My complaint against the CROWN in Federal Court Attn David
>> Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to submit a motion for a
>> publication ban on my complaint trust that you dudes are way past too
>> late
>> To: David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca, peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca
>> peacock.kurt@telegraphjournal.
>> david.akin@sunmedia.ca, robert.frater@justice.gc.ca,
>> paul.riley@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca,
>> greg@gregdelbigio.com, joyce.dewitt-vanoosten@gov.bc.
>> joan.barrett@ontario.ca, jean-vincent.lacroix@gouv.qc.
>> peter.rogers@mcinnescooper.com
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, gopublic@cbc.ca,
>> Whistleblower@ctv.ca
>>
>> https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-
>>
>> http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/
>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.
>>
>> I repeat what the Hell do I do with the Yankee wiretapes taps sell
>> them on Ebay or listen to them and argue them with you dudes in
>> Feferal Court?
>>
>> Petey Baby loses all parliamentary privelges in less than a month but
>> he still supposed to be an ethical officer of the Court CORRECT?
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:10:14 -0400
>> Subject: Yo Mr Bauer say hey to your client Obama and his buddies in
>> the USDOJ for me will ya?
>> To: RBauer@perkinscoie.com, sshimshak@paulweiss.com,
>> cspada@lswlaw.com, msmith@svlaw.com, bginsberg@pattonboggs.com,
>> gregory.craig@skadden.com, pm@pm.gc.ca, bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca
>> Cc: alevine@cooley.com, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
>> michael.rothfeld@wsj.com, remery@ecbalaw.com
>>
>> QSLS Politics
>> By Location Visit Detail
>> Visit 29,419
>> Domain Name usdoj.gov ? (U.S. Government)
>> IP Address 149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice)
>> ISP US Dept of Justice
>> Location Continent : North America
>> Country : United States (Facts)
>> State : District of Columbia
>> City : Washington
>> Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
>> Language English (U.S.) en-us
>> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
>> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
>> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
>> CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2;
>> DI60SP1001)
>> Javascript version 1.3
>> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
>> Color Depth : 32 bits
>> Time of Visit Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
>> Last Page View Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
>> Visit Length 0 seconds
>> Page Views 1
>> Referring URL http://www.google.co...
>> Search Engine google.com
>> Search Words david amos bernie madoff
>> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-
>> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-
>> Out Click
>> Time Zone UTC-5:00
>> Visitor's Time Nov 17 2012 12:33:08 pm
>> Visit Number 29,419
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>>
>>
>> Could ya tell I am investigating your pension plan bigtime? Its
>> because no member of the RCMP I have ever encountered has earned it yet
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:36:04 -0400
>> Subject: This is a brief as I can make my concerns Randy
>> To: randyedmunds@gov.nl.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> In a nutshell my concerns about the actions of the Investment Industry
>> affect the interests of every person in every district of every
>> country not just the USA and Canada. I was offering to help you with
>> Emera because my work with them and Danny Williams is well known and
>> some of it is over eight years old and in the PUBLIC Record.
>>
>> All you have to do is stand in the Legislature and ask the MInister of
>> Justice why I have been invited to sue Newfoundland by the
>> Conservatives
>>
>>
>> Obviously I am the guy the USDOJ and the SEC would not name who is the
>> link to Madoff and Putnam Investments
>>
>> Here is why
>>
>> http://banking.senate.gov/
>>
>> Notice the transcripts and webcasts of the hearing of the US Senate
>> Banking Commitee are still missing? Mr Emory should at least notice
>> Eliot Spitzer and the Dates around November 20th, 2003 in the
>> following file
>>
>> http://www.checktheevidence.
>>
>> http://occupywallst.org/users/
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Hansen, David" David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca
>> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 19:28:44 +0000
>> Subject: RE: I just called again Mr Hansen
>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Hello Mr. Amos,
>>
>> I manage the Justice Canada civil litigation section in the Atlantic
>> region. We are only responsible for litigating existing civil
>> litigation files in which the Attorney General of Canada is a named
>> defendant or plaintiff. If you are a plaintiff or defendant in an
>> existing civil litigation matter in the Atlantic region in which
>> Attorney General of Canada is a named defendant or plaintiff please
>> provide the court file number, the names of the parties in the action
>> and your question. I am not the appropriate contact for other
>> matters.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> David A. Hansen
>> Regional Director | Directeur régional
>> General Counsel |Avocat général
>> Civil Litigation and Advisory | Contentieux des affaires civiles et
>> services de consultation
>> Department of Justice | Ministère de la Justice
>> Suite 1400 – Duke Tower | Pièce 1400 – Tour Duke
>> 5251 Duke Street | 5251 rue Duke
>> Halifax, Nova Scotia | Halifax, Nouvelle- Écosse
>> B3J 1P3
>> david.hansen@justice.gc.ca
>> Telephone | Téléphone (902) 426-3261 / Facsimile | Télécopieur (902)
>> 426-2329
>> This e-mail is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client
>> privilege. Unauthorized distribution or disclosure is prohibited. If
>> you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us and delete
>> this entire e-mail.
>> Before printing think about the Environment
>> Thinking Green, please do not print this e-mail unless necessary.
>> Pensez vert, svp imprimez que si nécessaire.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:23:24 -0300
>>> Subject: ATTN FBI Special Agent Richard Deslauriers Have you talked to
>>> your buddies Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly about the wiretap tapes YET?
>>> To: boston@ic.fbi.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
>>> bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov,
>>> jcarney@carneybassil.com, bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, birgittaj@althingi.is,
>>> shmurphy@globe.com, redicecreations@gmail.com
>>>
>>> FBI Boston
>>> One Center Plaza
>>> Suite 600
>>> Boston, MA 02108
>>> Phone: (617) 742-5533
>>> Fax: (617) 223-6327
>>> E-mail: Boston@ic.fbi.gov
>>>
>>> Hours
>>> Although we operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, our normal
>>> "walk-in" business hours are from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
>>> through Friday. If you need to speak with a FBI representative at any
>>> time other than during normal business hours, please telephone our
>>> office at (617) 742-5533.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300
>>> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is
>>> finally underway now correct? What the hell do I do with the wiretap
>>> tapes Sell them on Ebay?
>>> To: Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov,
>>> Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney@carneybassil.com,
>>> bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, wolfheartlodge@live.com, shmurphy@globe.com,
>>> >> jonathan.albano@bingham.com, mvalencia@globe.com
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>>> PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov, rounappletree@aol.com
>>>
>>> http://www.bostonglobe.com/
>>>
>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>>
>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask
>>> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>
>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>> cards?
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>> United States Senate
>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>
>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>> tapes.
>>>
>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>
>>> Very truly yours,
>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "David Amos" david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>> To: "Rob Talach" rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing
>>> the Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why
>>>
>>> The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should mean
>>> a lot to you
>>>
>>> http://www.checktheevidence.
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:37:08 -0400
>>> Subject: To Hell with the KILLER COP Gilles Moreau What say you NOW
>>> Bernadine Chapman??
>>> To: Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, phil.giles@statcan.ca,
>>> maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca, Jennifer.Nixon@ps-sp.gc.ca,
>>> bartman.heidi@psic-ispc.gc.ca, Yves.J.Marineau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> david.paradiso@erc-cee.gc.ca, desaulniea@smtp.gc.ca,
>>> denise.brennan@tbs-sct.gc.ca, anne.murtha@vac-acc.gc.ca,
>>> webo@xplornet.com, julie.dickson@osfi-bsif.gc.ca,
>>> rod.giles@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, toewsv1@parl.gc.ca,
>>> Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca,Cleme
>>> >> oig@sec.gov, whistleblower@finra.org, whistle@fsa.gov.uk,
>>> david@fairwhistleblower.ca
>>> Cc: j.kroes@interpol.int, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
>>> bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.
>>> Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>>> Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca,
>>> ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>>
>>> http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/nb/
>>>
>>> http://nb.rcmpvet.ca/
>>>
>>> From: Gilles Moreau Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:03:22 -0500
>>> Subject: Re: Lets ee if the really nasty Newfy Lawyer Danny Boy
>>> Millions will explain this email to you or your boss Vic Toews EH
>>> Constable Peddle???
>>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Please cease and desist from using my name in your emails.
>>>
>>> Gilles Moreau, Chief Superintendent, CHRP and ACC
>>> Director General
>>> HR Transformation
>>> 73 Leikin Drive, M5-2-502
>>> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2
>>>
>>> Tel 613-843-6039
>>> Cel 613-818-6947
>>>
>>> Gilles Moreau, surintendant principal, CRHA et ACC
>>> Directeur général de la Transformation des ressources humaines
>>> 73 Leikin, pièce M5-2-502
>>> Ottawa, ON K1A 0R2
>>>
>>> tél 613-843-6039
>>> cel 613-818-6947
>>> gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>
https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
11 seconds ago
I just call AGAIN and my latest email to your Law Firm was blocked
Don't you think you should start returning calls and answering emails for the benefit of your famous client?
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 11:41:31 -0400
Subject: Attn Jennifer Robinson and Paul Hareijust called both of you here is a new blog
and an old email for the Doughty Street Law firm to review
To: j.robinson@doughtystreet.co.uk, paulhare@bu.edu
Cc:
David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
https://davidraymondamos3.
Friday, 12 April 2019
https://davidraymondamos3.
Friday, 12 April 2019
How the liberal tide turned against Julian Assange and WikiLeaks
https://www.cbc.ca/radio/
Today on The Current:
The arrest of Julian Assange Thursday starts a new chapter in the saga of the Wikileak's founder. We ask how the world should view him and what will be his legacy: as a whistleblower, a free-speech fighter, or a traitor?
Students in New Brunswick have been learning about Chinese language, food and culture in weekly half-hour classes paid for by the Confucius Institute. What they're not taught is anything remotely controversial, such as China's record on human rights violations. Are the classes a lesson in soft power and propaganda?
https://www.cbc.ca/radio/thecurrent/assange-s-legacy-could-be-undermined-by-his-own-selfish-attitude-former-diplomat-1.5095425
Assange's legacy could be undermined by his own 'selfish attitude': former diplomat
Wikileaks founder has 'inconvenienced many people,' says Peter Hare
The
legacy of Julian Assange's work as a whistleblower could be undermined
by his own "selfish attitude," according to a former diplomat.
"He highlighted an issue, which is you know transparency and openness and the use of the Internet, but I think increasingly he used it for his own ends," said Paul Hare, who was a British diplomat for 30 years.
Hare pointed out that while Assange rose to prominence through his efforts to disrupt diplomacy, he also took refuge in "a diplomatic mission for nearly seven years" to avoid extradition. During that time, Hare said that Assange "inconvenienced many people," including those who paid and lost security money for his bail.
"I think he's shown essentially quite a selfish attitude, and perhaps that will be how he will be remembered, rather than the wider causes, which he did espouse."
Wikileaks founder Assange was arrested by British police on a U.S. extradition request Thursday. He was removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where he had been claiming asylum for the past seven years.
His fight with authorities began in 2010, when he released reams of classified U.S. documents and videos about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, along with confidential diplomatic correspondence
"He highlighted an issue, which is you know transparency and openness and the use of the Internet, but I think increasingly he used it for his own ends," said Paul Hare, who was a British diplomat for 30 years.
Hare pointed out that while Assange rose to prominence through his efforts to disrupt diplomacy, he also took refuge in "a diplomatic mission for nearly seven years" to avoid extradition. During that time, Hare said that Assange "inconvenienced many people," including those who paid and lost security money for his bail.
"I think he's shown essentially quite a selfish attitude, and perhaps that will be how he will be remembered, rather than the wider causes, which he did espouse."
Wikileaks founder Assange was arrested by British police on a U.S. extradition request Thursday. He was removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where he had been claiming asylum for the past seven years.
His fight with authorities began in 2010, when he released reams of classified U.S. documents and videos about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, along with confidential diplomatic correspondence
CBC News
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange arrested
Video posted online by
Ruptly, part of Russia Today, showed at least eight men forcibly
escorting Julian Assange out of Ecuador's embassy in London. 0:34
- Dan Froomkin, editor of the website White House Watch, former Washington Post columnist, and former senior Washington correspondent for the Huffington Post.
- Paul Hare, former British diplomat who now teaches at the Frederick S. Pardee School of Global Studies at Boston University.
Produced by Howard Goldenthal and Ines COlabrese.
53 Comments
David R. Amos
Methinks some folks may enjoy scrolling down to read the first comment thread N'esy Pas?
David R. Amos
You can bet dimes to dollars I called Paul Hare after I heard this.
David R. Amos
Reply to @David R. Amos: Trust that I called Dan Froomkin as well
Roger Stiles
The acid test to the degree of hypocrisy and the reason to not take the people who adore Julian seriously is what would be the reaction of Canadians if instead of publishing top secret American info he had compromised Canadian national security. Or published for the entire world to read the status of aboriginals, human rights violations and black racism as reported by the UN.
Canada provides little reason to be taken seriously by anyone other than intellectally dishonest Canadias as your entire economy, national defence, and therefore your social programs are being brought to you courtesy of Americans.
Wilhelm Mux
Reply to @Roger Stiles:
All true but one could argue that the U.S. tacitly (now and in the past) has influenced us, in many many diverse and complex ways, through real elaborate and premeditated policy - to accomplish what you say...
(...and unduly... so is complicit in the entire negative condition of the situation...)
David R. Amos
Reply to @Roger
Stiles: "what would be the reaction of Canadians if instead of
publishing top secret American info he had compromised Canadian national
security."
Yo Yankee read real slow will ya?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/weston-canada-offered-to-aid-iraq-invasion-wikileaks-1.1062501
WESTON: Canada offered to aid Iraq invasion: WikiLeaks
Social Sharing
Greg Weston · CBC News · Posted: May 15, 2011 9:26 PM ET
"The same day Canada publicly refused to join the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, a high-ranking Canadian official was secretly promising the Americans clandestine military support for the fiercely controversial operation.
The revelation that Canadian forces may have secretly participated in the invasion of Iraq is contained in a classified U.S. diplomatic memo obtained exclusively by CBC News from the whistleblower website WikiLeaks.
On March 17, 2003, two days before U.S. warplanes launched their attack on Baghdad, prime minister Jean Chrétien told the House of Commons that Canadian forces would not be joining what the administration of then U.S. president George W. Bush dubbed the "coalition of the willing."
David Lynch
Reply to @Roger Stiles: You're conflating some Canadian support for Assange with all Canadians support for him. That's clearly not the case, but you wouldn't know that. A common American mistake is sweeping generalizations about other Nations. And last time I checked, it was Canadians who came to the defence of America in two Gulf wars, among other conflicts. It would help if you actually had your facts straight before posting nonsense.
Chris Gillespie
Roger Stiles
Reply to @David R. Amos: What amounts to a blurb about Canada isn't quite on the same scale as what he did to compromise U.S. security. And he didn't break into Canadian computers to get his Canadian blurb, did he? Other than that you make a strong case. LOL
Eva Beeley
Reply to @Roger Stiles:
Do you have proof of the allegations that Assange broke into anything? He's a publisher, not a computer hacker.
Parroting corporate media who protect the very same that Assange leaked about isn't proof.
As well, the evil empire has a monopoly on corruption and crimes against humanity, at home and abroad, so much more to leak. Simple mathematics, really.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Roger Stiles: What is so funny? Everybody in the know knows that I knew Assange long BEFORE he was famous and that I have no respect for him whatsoever. Perhaps you should research a man before you laugh at him EH Yankee?
David R. Amos
Reply to @Eva Beeley: Methinks you and many others may enjoy checking some facts on a few documents Assange has had since 2009 N'esy Pas?
https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/integrity-yea-right
David R. Amos
Reply to @Doug Mackenzie: You were right about "the hook line and sinker" comment but I doubt he even noticed N'esy Pas?
BTW Google Federal Court File No T-1557-15 and checkout Statements 82 and 83 and look for signs of my email to Greg Weston and the DND etc
Then Google David Amos Julian Assange
Anne Bochan
https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Kathryn98967631 and 47 others
Methinks everybody and his dog who knows of me would understand why I picked up the phone and sent some more emails after listening to and reading CBC this morning N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/04/how-liberal-tide-turned-against-julian.html
#nbpoli #cdnpoli
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/julian-assange-arrested-london-hero-or-villain-reputation-1.5095027
1906 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
Clayton Allen
Content disabled
Liberals love transparency... As long as you're not shining the light on them.
Kevin Jimmy spacey
Lol sooooo now it's this guy who won it for Trump ...Lol liberal media is sad almost 4 years now and they still can't accept it.
Kevan Cleverbridge (Hill 70)
Leftists say they seek the truth,yet when it doesn't suit their narrative,it becomes fake news.
Patrick
Smyth
Reply to @Kevan Cleverbridge (Hill 70):
All leftists????? Your generalizations speak VOLUMES about you.
Frank Hammerschmidt
Dig up dirt on our enemies but not on us .....love the liberal hypocrisy of openness and transparency.
Eva Beeley
Reply to @John Watson:
There's no denying the cognitive dissonance that has swept over a majority of Democrats/Liberals (not to be confused with the left).
In defence of their own, they will fight tooth and nail to defend the indefensible.
Proven in Trump stories and proven once again in SNC stories.
You're one of them actually, in a response to me on the latter.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Eva Beeley: Methinks cognitive dissonance is rampant throughout the supporters of ALL political parties not just the ones you don't respect N'esy Pas?
Eva Beeley
Reply to @David R. Amos:
Can't say for certain. Yet for this group in particular, where once our opinions aligned, all that has changed.
The only rationale I can think of, is those who strongly embraced and/or rejected populist governments.
Gerry Podbielski
Chelsea and Assange are persecuted by the law for exposing serious war crimes while the war criminals roam free. Something is seriously wrong with us as a society if we see nothing wrong with this.
Eva Beeley
Reply to @Matt Thuaii:
Run by humans who abuse power through corruption and greed at best, crimes against humanity at worst.
Those Gerry refers to, are kept in secret by these 'humans' to continue their cushy existence.
Thus the propaganda, thus the need for Assange.
David R. Amos
Elias Eliot
Anyone who is remotely or imaginary associated with the defeat of Hillary, in the last election, is an enemy of the liberals.
Eva Beeley
Reply to @Elias Eliot:
The issue here is liberals and left.
Though a wide spectrum, most liberals are left of centre or centre, This is the group CNN/Democrats pander to (Canada is not that much different, in my further left opinion).
However, the power in the party is to the right; thus smearing Sanders, Gabbard, Ocasio-Cortez etc. (of the three, AOC is the furthest left).
I'm speculating here, but the preferred candidate for those in power would be Biden.
David R. Amos
Reply to @David R. Amos:
I agree with Pence pulling Trump's strings alongside many others currently.
The left however, as is here in Canada (though worse in the US) is an anomaly.
I could never understand voting for Hillary, though Bernie a force to reckon with, his defeat and endorsement, left no choice (we'd never know the truth of his defeat without Assange). To further my point for Canada, voting neoliberal is never an option for me.
Biden is the establishment's choice, the populous may not have one. We'll see.
Lloyd Davidson
Just shows how easily the left will turn on, and throw anyone under the bus if it suits their needs. Desperate people are dangerous people.
Eva Beeley
Reply to @Lloyd Davidson:
Not all left, just neoliberals.
But agree, I'm left and have seen how bad it gets.
David R. Amos
Eva Beeley
Reply to @David R. Amos:
Agreed, looking back I should have chosen my words better. Thanks for that.
By the way, I looked at the information you had on Assange, while intrigued, it's too convoluted to get the gist of it.
Can you summarize?
Mark Irvine
So in the Liberals world, he was okay until he started exposing them.
Jim LaPalmier
"Trump in 2016: I love WikiLeaks"
"Trump now: I know nothing about WikiLeaks"
You just cannot make this stuff up !
Unless, of course, you are Donald J. Trump.
Doug McComber
That's it exactly, he was the "truth seeker" until the truths he was telling exposed Hilliary.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:10:07 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Al Burke I just called about your pal Assange
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
message will be carefully reviewed.
To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
Thank you
-------------------
Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
Vancouver Granville.
Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
votre adresse et votre code postal.
Merci
This document was attached to the email
https://www.scribd.com/doc/
Yo Yankee read real slow will ya?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/weston-canada-offered-to-aid-iraq-invasion-wikileaks-1.1062501
WESTON: Canada offered to aid Iraq invasion: WikiLeaks
Social Sharing
Greg Weston · CBC News · Posted: May 15, 2011 9:26 PM ET
"The same day Canada publicly refused to join the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, a high-ranking Canadian official was secretly promising the Americans clandestine military support for the fiercely controversial operation.
The revelation that Canadian forces may have secretly participated in the invasion of Iraq is contained in a classified U.S. diplomatic memo obtained exclusively by CBC News from the whistleblower website WikiLeaks.
On March 17, 2003, two days before U.S. warplanes launched their attack on Baghdad, prime minister Jean Chrétien told the House of Commons that Canadian forces would not be joining what the administration of then U.S. president George W. Bush dubbed the "coalition of the willing."
David Lynch
Reply to @Roger Stiles: You're conflating some Canadian support for Assange with all Canadians support for him. That's clearly not the case, but you wouldn't know that. A common American mistake is sweeping generalizations about other Nations. And last time I checked, it was Canadians who came to the defence of America in two Gulf wars, among other conflicts. It would help if you actually had your facts straight before posting nonsense.
Chris Gillespie
Reply to @Roger Stiles: What nonsense.
If the Canadian government or any of our political parties were committing crimes or being corrupted on the scale of our american cousins then we all be grateful to any Julian Assange type whistle-blower who might expose the hypothetical misdeeds. Certainly Americans owe Mr. Assange a great debt for exposing the war crimes of the American military and the corruption of the Democratic Party. The only way to improve things is to confront problems and misconduct - not to imprison the messenger.
As for Canadian economy being brought to us "courtesy of Americans" - Ha, Ha, Ha, that's a laugh. If that's true then can I put in a complaint with our American overlords as they are doing a very poor job of it!
If the Canadian government or any of our political parties were committing crimes or being corrupted on the scale of our american cousins then we all be grateful to any Julian Assange type whistle-blower who might expose the hypothetical misdeeds. Certainly Americans owe Mr. Assange a great debt for exposing the war crimes of the American military and the corruption of the Democratic Party. The only way to improve things is to confront problems and misconduct - not to imprison the messenger.
As for Canadian economy being brought to us "courtesy of Americans" - Ha, Ha, Ha, that's a laugh. If that's true then can I put in a complaint with our American overlords as they are doing a very poor job of it!
Perter Bella
Reply to @Roger Stiles: your logic is invalid. truth is the only way to set thing straight.
Doug Mackenzie
Reply to @David Lynch:
"A common American mistake is sweeping generalizations about other Nations."
Riiiinnnnnnnnnng
Hello?
Hey, Kettle. It's Pot.
Pot?! (excitedly)
No, not that Pot; the other one.
Ohh. Hey, Pot. What's up?
You're black.
Click. Nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn . . .
"A common American mistake is sweeping generalizations about other Nations."
Riiiinnnnnnnnnng
Hello?
Hey, Kettle. It's Pot.
Pot?! (excitedly)
No, not that Pot; the other one.
Ohh. Hey, Pot. What's up?
You're black.
Click. Nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn . . .
Dan Duran
Reply to @Roger Stiles: So you're saying UN reported on that, and you are writing it here, what do you need Assange for?
Roger Stiles
Reply to @David R. Amos: What amounts to a blurb about Canada isn't quite on the same scale as what he did to compromise U.S. security. And he didn't break into Canadian computers to get his Canadian blurb, did he? Other than that you make a strong case. LOL
Eva Beeley
Reply to @Roger Stiles:
Do you have proof of the allegations that Assange broke into anything? He's a publisher, not a computer hacker.
Parroting corporate media who protect the very same that Assange leaked about isn't proof.
As well, the evil empire has a monopoly on corruption and crimes against humanity, at home and abroad, so much more to leak. Simple mathematics, really.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Roger Stiles: What is so funny? Everybody in the know knows that I knew Assange long BEFORE he was famous and that I have no respect for him whatsoever. Perhaps you should research a man before you laugh at him EH Yankee?
David R. Amos
Reply to @Eva Beeley: Methinks you and many others may enjoy checking some facts on a few documents Assange has had since 2009 N'esy Pas?
https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/integrity-yea-right
David R. Amos
Reply to @Doug Mackenzie: You were right about "the hook line and sinker" comment but I doubt he even noticed N'esy Pas?
BTW Google Federal Court File No T-1557-15 and checkout Statements 82 and 83 and look for signs of my email to Greg Weston and the DND etc
Then Google David Amos Julian Assange
Anne Bochan
Reply to @Roger
Stiles: Reply to @Roger Stiles: Well Roger, what if the US invaded Iraq
illegally and nobody from the main stream provided the credible evidence
to prove that fact. What if the Americans were secretly snatching
people from anywhere they chose and ferreting them away in unmarked
planes to places like Syria to be tortured? What about contractors that
killed innocent people from helicopters including journalists. How about
tank commanders ordering the firing of shells on a hotel in Baghdad
where journalists from around the world were staying, killing dozens?
David R. Amos
Reply to @Anne Bochan: FYI
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
Portion of Statement 82
"On Aril 1, 2003 within two weeks of the beginning of the War on Iraq, the US Secret Service threatened to practice extraordinary rendition because false allegations of a Presidential threat were made against him by an American court. However, the Americans and the Crown cannot deny that what he said in two courts on April 1, 2003 because he published the recordings of what was truly said as soon as he got the court tapes. The RCMP knows those words can still be heard on the Internet today. In 2009, the Plaintiff began to complain of Barry Winters about something far more important to Canada as nation because of Winters’ bragging of being one of 24 CF officers who assisted the Americans in the planning the War on Iraq in 2002. In the Plaintiff’s humble opinion the mandate of the DND is Defence not Attack. He is not so naive to think that such plans of war do not occur but if Barry Winters was in fact one of the CF officers who did so then he broke his oath to the Crown the instant he bragged of it in his blog. If Winters was never an officer in the CF then he broke the law by impersonating an officer. The Plaintiff downloaded the emails of the Privy Council about Wikileaks. The bragging of Barry Winters should have been investigated in 2009 before CBC reported that documents released by WikiLeaks supported his information about Canadian involvement in the War on Iraq."
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
Portion of Statement 82
"On Aril 1, 2003 within two weeks of the beginning of the War on Iraq, the US Secret Service threatened to practice extraordinary rendition because false allegations of a Presidential threat were made against him by an American court. However, the Americans and the Crown cannot deny that what he said in two courts on April 1, 2003 because he published the recordings of what was truly said as soon as he got the court tapes. The RCMP knows those words can still be heard on the Internet today. In 2009, the Plaintiff began to complain of Barry Winters about something far more important to Canada as nation because of Winters’ bragging of being one of 24 CF officers who assisted the Americans in the planning the War on Iraq in 2002. In the Plaintiff’s humble opinion the mandate of the DND is Defence not Attack. He is not so naive to think that such plans of war do not occur but if Barry Winters was in fact one of the CF officers who did so then he broke his oath to the Crown the instant he bragged of it in his blog. If Winters was never an officer in the CF then he broke the law by impersonating an officer. The Plaintiff downloaded the emails of the Privy Council about Wikileaks. The bragging of Barry Winters should have been investigated in 2009 before CBC reported that documents released by WikiLeaks supported his information about Canadian involvement in the War on Iraq."
David R. Amos
Reply to @David R. Amos:
83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over five years after he began his bragging:
January 13, 2015
This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
December 8, 2014
Why Canada Stood Tall!
Friday, October 3, 2014
Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
Stupid Justin Trudeau
Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute” Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind. The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s then grossly incorrect assumption.
83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over five years after he began his bragging:
January 13, 2015
This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
December 8, 2014
Why Canada Stood Tall!
Friday, October 3, 2014
Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
Stupid Justin Trudeau
Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute” Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind. The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s then grossly incorrect assumption.
https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Kathryn98967631 and 47 others
Methinks everybody and his dog who knows of me would understand why I picked up the phone and sent some more emails after listening to and reading CBC this morning N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/04/how-liberal-tide-turned-against-julian.html
#nbpoli #cdnpoli
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/julian-assange-arrested-london-hero-or-villain-reputation-1.5095027
How the liberal tide turned against Julian Assange and WikiLeaks
1906 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
Clayton Allen
Content disabled
Liberals love transparency... As long as you're not shining the light on them.
Don Mason
Content disabled
Reply to @Clayton Allen,
"Liberals love transparency... As long as you're not shining the light on them."
Reply to @Clayton Allen,
"Liberals love transparency... As long as you're not shining the light on them."
David R. Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @Don Mason: I second your remark only louder BINGO
Reply to @Don Mason: I second your remark only louder BINGO
Kevin Jimmy spacey
Lol sooooo now it's this guy who won it for Trump ...Lol liberal media is sad almost 4 years now and they still can't accept it.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Kevin Jimmy
spacey: Methinks many folks found it incredibly comical to hear Trump's
BS about Assange today N'esy Pas?
Mick Fontana
Reply to @David R. Amos: Methinks you always start sentences with methinks and end it with N'esy Pas, n'est-ce pas ?
David R. Amos
Reply to @Mick Fontana: YUP
Matt Thuaii
Reply to @Kevin Jimmy spacey:
That is not why the “liberal” tide turned on him. The tide turned on him because first he pulled back the curtain on many of the immoral, unethical, invisible actions regularly performed by our “responsible” governments...then they wove him into that curtain...
...then he became the curtain.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Matt Thuaii: "then he became the curtain."
Nope I Wholeheartedly Disagree Whereas I dicing with Assange in 2009 before he became famous and spoke to him personally in no uncertain terms before he dumped the DNC emails etc, trust that I know a lot more about this than you will ever believe.
Methinks many of his foes should agree that George Soros and his lawyers at CCR should confess that Assange was always a pawn in the wicked game N'esy Pas?
Eva Beeley
Reply to @David R. Amos:
How so?
Fred Sanford
Everyone is for transparency until it's their dirty laundry being aired.
David R. Amos
Reply to @david mccaig: "WIKILEAKS was worlds purest source of information"
NOPE
Reply to @Kevin Jimmy spacey:
That is not why the “liberal” tide turned on him. The tide turned on him because first he pulled back the curtain on many of the immoral, unethical, invisible actions regularly performed by our “responsible” governments...then they wove him into that curtain...
...then he became the curtain.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Matt Thuaii: "then he became the curtain."
Nope I Wholeheartedly Disagree Whereas I dicing with Assange in 2009 before he became famous and spoke to him personally in no uncertain terms before he dumped the DNC emails etc, trust that I know a lot more about this than you will ever believe.
Methinks many of his foes should agree that George Soros and his lawyers at CCR should confess that Assange was always a pawn in the wicked game N'esy Pas?
Eva Beeley
Reply to @David R. Amos:
How so?
Fred Sanford
Everyone is for transparency until it's their dirty laundry being aired.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Fred Sanford: YUP
David R. Amos
Reply to @david mccaig: "WIKILEAKS was worlds purest source of information"
NOPE
Kevan Cleverbridge (Hill 70)
Leftists say they seek the truth,yet when it doesn't suit their narrative,it becomes fake news.
Doug James
Reply to @Neil Shields:
Hillary had the support of the left as she was a woman. One of the great under
classes oppressed by the patriarchy of old white men.
Hillary had the support of the left as she was a woman. One of the great under
classes oppressed by the patriarchy of old white men.
David R. Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @Kevan Cleverbridge (Hill 70): "Leftists say they seek the truth,yet when it doesn't suit their narrative,it becomes fake news."
Oh So True However methinks the same can be said of the right wing wackos too N'esy Pas?
Reply to @Kevan Cleverbridge (Hill 70): "Leftists say they seek the truth,yet when it doesn't suit their narrative,it becomes fake news."
Oh So True However methinks the same can be said of the right wing wackos too N'esy Pas?
David R. Amos
Reply to @Doug James: Methinks thou doth jest too much N'esy Pas?
Reply to @Kevan Cleverbridge (Hill 70):
All leftists????? Your generalizations speak VOLUMES about you.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Patrick
Smyth: Methinks when my comment about their right wing foes goes "Poof"
it should speak volumes to me N'esy Pas?
Frank Hammerschmidt
Dig up dirt on our enemies but not on us .....love the liberal hypocrisy of openness and transparency.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Frank Hammerschmidt: "Love the liberal hypocrisy of openness and transparency. "
Nay Not I ( I know you were joking as am I)
Nay Not I ( I know you were joking as am I)
Eva Beeley
Reply to @John Watson:
There's no denying the cognitive dissonance that has swept over a majority of Democrats/Liberals (not to be confused with the left).
In defence of their own, they will fight tooth and nail to defend the indefensible.
Proven in Trump stories and proven once again in SNC stories.
You're one of them actually, in a response to me on the latter.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Eva Beeley: Methinks cognitive dissonance is rampant throughout the supporters of ALL political parties not just the ones you don't respect N'esy Pas?
Eva Beeley
Reply to @David R. Amos:
Can't say for certain. Yet for this group in particular, where once our opinions aligned, all that has changed.
The only rationale I can think of, is those who strongly embraced and/or rejected populist governments.
Gerry Podbielski
Chelsea and Assange are persecuted by the law for exposing serious war crimes while the war criminals roam free. Something is seriously wrong with us as a society if we see nothing wrong with this.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Gerry Podbielski: Well put
Eva Beeley
Reply to @Matt Thuaii:
Run by humans who abuse power through corruption and greed at best, crimes against humanity at worst.
Those Gerry refers to, are kept in secret by these 'humans' to continue their cushy existence.
Thus the propaganda, thus the need for Assange.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Eva Beeley: Oh So True
Elias Eliot
Anyone who is remotely or imaginary associated with the defeat of Hillary, in the last election, is an enemy of the liberals.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Elias Eliot: True
Eva Beeley
Reply to @Elias Eliot:
The issue here is liberals and left.
Though a wide spectrum, most liberals are left of centre or centre, This is the group CNN/Democrats pander to (Canada is not that much different, in my further left opinion).
However, the power in the party is to the right; thus smearing Sanders, Gabbard, Ocasio-Cortez etc. (of the three, AOC is the furthest left).
I'm speculating here, but the preferred candidate for those in power would be Biden.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Eva Beeley:
Methinks those in power had their man Pence pulling Trump's strings
before the left was shocked by Hillary's big defeat. Old man Biden will
never be a contender You must admit he has too much sick stuff in his
baggage thats beginning to leak N'esy Pas?
Eva BeeleyReply to @David R. Amos:
I agree with Pence pulling Trump's strings alongside many others currently.
The left however, as is here in Canada (though worse in the US) is an anomaly.
I could never understand voting for Hillary, though Bernie a force to reckon with, his defeat and endorsement, left no choice (we'd never know the truth of his defeat without Assange). To further my point for Canada, voting neoliberal is never an option for me.
Biden is the establishment's choice, the populous may not have one. We'll see.
Lloyd Davidson
Just shows how easily the left will turn on, and throw anyone under the bus if it suits their needs. Desperate people are dangerous people.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Lloyd Davidson: YUP
Eva Beeley
Reply to @Lloyd Davidson:
Not all left, just neoliberals.
But agree, I'm left and have seen how bad it gets.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Eva Beeley: "I'm left and have seen how bad it gets."
Methinks its not wise to paint yourself into a corner N'esy Pas?
Methinks its not wise to paint yourself into a corner N'esy Pas?
Eva Beeley
Reply to @David R. Amos:
Agreed, looking back I should have chosen my words better. Thanks for that.
By the way, I looked at the information you had on Assange, while intrigued, it's too convoluted to get the gist of it.
Can you summarize?
Mark Irvine
So in the Liberals world, he was okay until he started exposing them.
David
Novak
Reply to @Mark Irvine: Don't presume to tell us what others think. Don't presume anything.
David R. Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @David Novak: I agree Methinks you and many others may enjoy checking some facts on a few documents Assange has had since 2009 N'esy Pas?
https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/integrity-yea-right
Eva Beeley
Reply to @Mark Irvine:
It would be fair to say too many but not all.
Reply to @David Novak: I agree Methinks you and many others may enjoy checking some facts on a few documents Assange has had since 2009 N'esy Pas?
https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/integrity-yea-right
Eva Beeley
Reply to @Mark Irvine:
It would be fair to say too many but not all.
David R. Amos
Reply to @David
Novak: I agree Methinks you and many others may enjoy checking some
facts on a few documents Assange has had since 2009 N'esy Pas?
https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/integrity-yea-right
https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/integrity-yea-right
Jim LaPalmier
"Trump in 2016: I love WikiLeaks"
"Trump now: I know nothing about WikiLeaks"
You just cannot make this stuff up !
Unless, of course, you are Donald J. Trump.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Jim LaPalmier: Welcome to the Circus
Doug McComber
That's it exactly, he was the "truth seeker" until the truths he was telling exposed Hilliary.
Eva Beeley
Reply to @Doug McComber:
I called it, years ago.
Blind partisans unfortunately are just too blind to see.
I called it, years ago.
Blind partisans unfortunately are just too blind to see.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Eva Beeley:
Methinks many people know that I was not impressed with Assange before
he became famous Anyone can Google his name and mine N'esy Pas?
---------- Original message ----------
From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:10:07 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Al Burke I just called about your pal Assange
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
message will be carefully reviewed.
To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
Thank you
-------------------
Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
Vancouver Granville.
Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
votre adresse et votre code postal.
Merci
This document was attached to the email
https://www.scribd.com/doc/
---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 23:54:14 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Daniel Froomkin I just called
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 19:53:09 -0400
Subject: Attn Daniel Froomkin I just called
To: froomkin@whitehousewatch.com, dan@froomkin.com, mdcohen212
<mdcohen212@gmail.com>
Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca
pablo.rodriguez@parl.gc.ca, Newsroom@globeandmail.com
Dan FroomkinVerified account
@froomkin
Editor of White House Watch. Previously seen @theintercept @huffpost
@washingtonpost email me at froomkin@whitehousewatch.com
Daniel Froomkin
4315 39th St., N.W.
Washington, DC 20016
2023630309
Email: dan@froomkin.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Michael Cohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:15:14 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA ATTN Pierre-Luc.Dusseault I just
called and left a message for you
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
directed to 646-853-0114.
______________________________
This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its
affiliates.Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an
electronic signature under applicable law.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 12:09:11 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Attn Al Burke I just called about your pal Assange
To: j.robinson@doughtystreet.co.uk
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 09:09:29 -0400
Subject: Attn Al Burke I just called about your pal Assange
To: editor@nnn.se, matt.kwong@cbc.ca, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news-tips <news-tips@nytimes.com>, news
<news@hilltimes.com>, "Neil.Macdonald" <Neil.Macdonald@cbc.ca>,
newsroom <newsroom@theguardian.pe.ca>, "ed.pilkington"
<ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
<letters@globeandmail.com>, rfife <rfife@globeandmail.com>,
"Jody.Wilson-Raybould" <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
"Jane.Philpott" <Jane.Philpott@parl.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen"
<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "Nathalie.Drouin"
<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
How the liberal tide turned against Julian Assange and WikiLeaks
Assange 'proselytized about radical transparency' but some critics
call him a 'pawn'
Matt Kwong · CBC News · Posted: Apr 11, 2019 11:36 PM ET
"Assange has a loyal defender in Swedish journalist Al Burke, who has
spoken with Assange and visited him in London a few years ago. Burke
suspects media outlets and the Central Intelligence Agency will seek
to further tarnish the WikiLeaks founder.
"I think he will be besmirched. He will be regarded as various
negative things. Like a pawn, a rapist, and so on and so forth. I
don't think he'll get a fair shake."
Burke called the rape accusations against Assange "manufactured" and
believes Ecuador's decision to revoke the WikiLeaks founder's asylum
was motivated by a desire to distract from corruption allegations
faced by the Ecuadorian president.
"A little part of me found almost relief because he's now going to get
some fresh air and some sunlight," Burke said of Assange's arrest and
eviction from the embassy.
"In terms of his physical condition, it's clearly an improvement for
him. But in many other ways, it's a disaster."
https://www.nnn.se/info/
Within Sweden: 08 - 731 9200
Outside Sweden: +46/8 - 731 9200
editor@nnn.se
https://davidraymondamos3.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 13:41:38 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Barry Pollack, Theresa May, Zachary
Terwilliger and Tracy McCormick Re the imprisonments of Chelsea
Manning and Julian Assange
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
mailto:publiceditor@
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 09:40:29 -0400
Subject: Attn Barry Pollack, Theresa May, Zachary Terwilliger and
Tracy McCormick Re the imprisonments of Chelsea Manning and Julian
Assange
To: "theresa.may.mp" <theresa.may.mp@parliament.uk>
<mayt@parliament.uk>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, Zachary.terwilliger@usdoj.gov,
tracy.mccormick@usdoj.gov, joshua.stueve@usdoj.gov, "william.barr"
<william.barr@usdoj.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, bpollack@robbinsrussell.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
"ed.pilkington" <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>
<news-tips@nytimes.com>, news <news@hilltimes.com>
https://www.usatoday.com/
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange arrested in London to face hacking
conspiracy charge in the US
Sean Rossman, Doug Stanglin and Bart Jansen, USATNetwork Published
5:50 a.m. ET April 11, 2019
'Barry Pollack, a U.S. lawyer for Assange, criticized the arrest and
said Assange would need medical treatment that had been denied for
seven years.
"It is bitterly disappointing that a country would allow someone to
whom it has extended citizenship and asylum to be arrested in its
embassy," Pollack said." Once his health care needs have been
addressed, the UK courts will need to resolve what appears to be an
unprecedented effort by the United States seeking to extradite a
foreign journalist to face criminal charges for publishing truthful
information."
Tel: 202.775.4514
Fax: 202.775.4510
bpollack@robbinsrussell.com
https://www.theguardian.com/
Theresa May has given a statement about Assange. Speaking to the
Commons before updating MPs on the Brexit delay, she said:
I am sure that the whole house will welcome the news this morning
that the Metropolitan Police have arrested Julian Assange – arrested
for breach of bail after nearly seven years in the Ecuadorian embassy.
He has also been arrested in relation to an extradition request from
the United States’ authorities. This is now a legal matter before the
courts. The home secretary will make a statement on this later, but I
would like to thank the Metropolitan Police for carrying out their
duties with great professionalism and to welcome the cooperation of
the Ecuadorian government in bringing this matter to a resolution.
This goes to show that, in the United Kingdom, no one is above the
law.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-
Department of Justice
U.S. Attorney’s Office
Eastern District of Virginia
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Thursday, April 11, 2019
WikiLeaks Founder Charged in Computer Hacking Conspiracy
ALEXANDRIA, Va. – Julian P. Assange, 47, the founder of WikiLeaks, was
arrested today in the United Kingdom pursuant to the U.S./UK
Extradition Treaty, in connection with a federal charge of conspiracy
to commit computer intrusion for agreeing to break a password to a
classified U.S. government computer.
According to court documents unsealed today, the charge relates to
Assange’s alleged role in one of the largest compromises of classified
information in the history of the United States.
The indictment alleges that in March 2010, Assange engaged in a
conspiracy with Chelsea Manning, a former intelligence analyst in the
U.S. Army, to assist Manning in cracking a password stored on U.S.
Department of Defense computers connected to the Secret Internet
Protocol Network (SIPRNet), a U.S. government network used for
classified documents and communications. Manning, who had access to
the computers in connection with her duties as an intelligence
analyst, was using the computers to download classified records to
transmit to WikiLeaks. Cracking the password would have allowed
Manning to log on to the computers under a username that did not
belong to her. Such a deceptive measure would have made it more
difficult for investigators to determine the source of the illegal
disclosures.
During the conspiracy, Manning and Assange engaged in real-time
discussions regarding Manning’s transmission of classified records to
Assange. The discussions also reflect Assange actively encouraging
Manning to provide more information. During an exchange, Manning told
Assange that “after this upload, that’s all I really have got left.”
To which Assange replied, “curious eyes never run dry in my
experience.”
Assange is charged with conspiracy to commit computer intrusion and is
presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable
doubt. If convicted, he faces a maximum penalty of five years in
prison. Actual sentences for federal crimes are typically less than
the maximum penalties. A federal district court judge will determine
any sentence after taking into account the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines
and other statutory factors.
G. Zachary Terwilliger, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of
Virginia, John C. Demers, Assistant Attorney General for National
Security, and Nancy McNamara, Assistant Director in Charge of the
FBI’s Washington Field Office, made the announcement after the charges
were unsealed. First Assistant U.S. Attorney Tracy Doherty-McCormick,
Assistant U.S. Attorneys Kellen S. Dwyer, Thomas W. Traxler and Gordon
D. Kromberg, and Trial Attorneys Matthew R. Walczewski and Nicholas O.
Hunter of the Justice Department’s National Security Division are
prosecuting the case.
The extradition will be handled by the Department of Justice’s Office
of International Affairs.
A copy of this press release is located on the website of the U.S.
Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia. Related court
documents and information are located on the website of the District
Court for the Eastern District of Virginia or on PACER by searching
for Case No. 1:18-cr-111.
An indictment contains allegations that a defendant has committed a
crime. Every defendant is presumed to be innocent until and unless
proven guilty in court.
Attachment(s):
Download assange_indictment.pdf
Topic(s):
Cyber Crime
National Security
Component(s):
USAO - Virginia, Eastern
Contact:
Joshua Stueve
Director of Communications
joshua.stueve@usdoj.gov
https://www.justice.gov/usao-
Meet the U.S. Attorney
G. Zachary Terwilliger
Department of Justice
G. Zachary Terwilliger is the 62nd United States Attorney for the
Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA).
As the chief federal law enforcement officer in EDVA, Terwilliger
supervises the prosecution of all federal crimes and the litigation of
all civil matters in which the United States has an interest. As U.S.
Attorney, Terwilliger leads a staff of over 250 prosecutors, civil
litigators, and support personnel located in Alexandria, Newport News,
Norfolk, and Richmond.
Prior to his appointment as U.S. Attorney on May 25, 2018, Terwilliger
served as an Associate Deputy Attorney General, and Chief of Staff in
the Office of the Deputy Attorney General at the Department of
Justice. In that role, Terwilliger was a principal advisor to senior
Department of Justice leadership in areas such as corporate
compliance, federal, state and local law enforcement cooperation,
violent crime reduction, and other critical matters.
Credentialed media members may contact Joshua Stueve, Director of
Communications for the Eastern District of Virginia, at:
joshua.stueve@usdoj.gov or call 703-842-4050
By Telephone
Alexandria: (703) 299-3700
Newport News: (757) 591-4000
Norfolk: (757) 441-6331
Richmond: (804) 819-5400
https://davidraymondamos3.
Thursday, 11 April 2019
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange arrested, U.K. police say
Well I contacted and called Manning's lawyer first and it appeared
that she didn't care about what I was trying to tell her. So I quickly
gave up
https://moatlaw.com/contact-
Contact Me
If you are interested in a consultation, please leave your name,
email, and a good number at which to reach you, along with a brief
indication of what you want to meet about. Please do not leave any
other information in this form, as it will not be considered
privileged!
Message Sent (go back)
Name: David Raymond Amos
Email: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Phone Number: https://davidraymondamos3.
Subject of Requested Meeting: Perhaps we should discuss Manning's concerns ASAP?
https://davidraymondamos3.
Thursday, 11 April 2019
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange arrested, U.K. police say
https://twitter.com/
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Kathryn98967631 and 47 others
Methinks Manning's and Assange's lawyers should read paragraphs 82 and
83 of my lawsuit (Federal Court File No.T-1557-15) ASAP N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.
#nbpoli #cdnpoli
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
Moira Meltzer-Cohen
277 Broadway Suite 1501,
NY, NY 10007
t: 347.248.6771
https://twitter.com/
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Kathryn98967631 and 47 others
Methinks Manning's and Assange's lawyers should read paragraphs 82 and
83 of my lawsuit (Federal Court File No.T-1557-15) ASAP N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.
#nbpoli #cdnpoli
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange arrested, U.K. police say
469 Comments
David R. Amos
Methinks Mr Assange's lawyers should read paragraph 83 of my lawsuit
(Federal Court File No.T-1557-15) ASAP N'esy Pas?
Doug McComber
Reply to @David R. Amos: Methinks with your bright avatar and litany
of "Methinks" posts on every article (and your lawsuit) that you are
an attention seeker.
Andre Garafolo
Reply David R. Amosto @Doug McComber: Annoying, isn't it.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Doug McComber: Methinks you should have read paragraph 82 of
my lawsuit before you offered your two bit worth N'esy Pas?
David R. Amos
Reply to @Andre Garafolo: Cry me a river
https://davidraymondamos3.
Friday, 18 September 2015
David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15
Court File No. T-1557-15
FEDERAL COURT
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Plaintiff
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
82. The Plaintiff states that any politician or police officer should
have seen enough of Barry Winter’s WordPress blog by June 22, 2015
particularly after the very unnecessary demise of two men in Alberta
because of the incompetence of the EPS. Barry Winters was blogging
about the EPS using battering ram in order to execute a warrant for a
250 dollar bylaw offence at the same time Professor Kris Wells
revealed in a televised interview that the EPS member who was killed
was the one investigating the cyber harassment of him. It was obvious
why the police and politicians ignored all the death threats, sexual
harassment, cyberbullying and hate speech of a proud Zionist who
claimed to be a former CF officer who now working for the Department
of National Defence (DND). It is well known that no politician in
Canada is allowed to sit in Parliament as a member of the major
parties unless they support Israel. Since 2002 the Plaintiff made it
well known that he does not support Israeli actions and was against
the American plan to make war on Iraq. On Aril 1, 2003 within two
weeks of the beginning of the War on Iraq, the US Secret Service
threatened to practice extraordinary rendition because false
allegations of a Presidential threat were made against him by an
American court. However, the Americans and the Crown cannot deny that
what he said in two courts on April 1, 2003 because he published the
recordings of what was truly said as soon as he got the court tapes.
The RCMP knows those words can still be heard on the Internet today.
In 2009, the Plaintiff began to complain of Barry Winters about
something far more important to Canada as nation because of Winters’
bragging of being one of 24 CF officers who assisted the Americans in
the planning the War on Iraq in 2002. In the Plaintiff’s humble
opinion the mandate of the DND is Defence not Attack. He is not so
naive to think that such plans of war do not occur but if Barry
Winters was in fact one of the CF officers who did so then he broke
his oath to the Crown the instant he bragged of it in his blog. If
Winters was never an officer in the CF then he broke the law by
impersonating an officer. The Plaintiff downloaded the emails of the
Privy Council about Wikileaks. The bragging of Barry Winters should
have been investigated in 2009 before CBC reported that documents
released by WikiLeaks supported his information about Canadian
involvement in the War on Iraq.
83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
five years after he began his bragging:
January 13, 2015
This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
December 8, 2014
Why Canada Stood Tall!
Friday, October 3, 2014
Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
Stupid Justin Trudeau
Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
campaign of 2006.
What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An
ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear
and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,”
or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of
terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states
“moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of
Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an
ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the
Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty
was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the
amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time
denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time
self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of
“world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the
G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious
behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister
Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully
cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits
are not.
Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal
mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the
world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy”
David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security
and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can
and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing
“humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war
criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending
tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
“the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing,
marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian
military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern
equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are
antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five
years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that
won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin
Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not
served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social
democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and
other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet
these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to
other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security,
and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before
shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now
From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and
the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still
alive
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply
to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
>>>>
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the
War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil,
Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.
william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca,
milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca,
sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari
<smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
susan@blueskystrategygroup.com
eugene@blueskystrategygroup.
Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice" <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin"
<terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower
<whistleblower@ctv.ca>
I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David
Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's
Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on
CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To
be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested
that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise
if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else
about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact that your
old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English
never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is
interesting though
http://www.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/
Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad
Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a
shy political animal
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
Enjoy Mr Weston
http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/
"But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
including a Canadian general.
That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was
also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
http://baconfat53.blogspot.
"I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
"veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
into the US policy.
At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was
never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
were deployed WMD.
Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
(and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions
are to met before US troop can redeploy? Prime Minister Jean Chretien
and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of
Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them
correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the
George W Bush administration was onerous
American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
....not necessarily in that order. "
You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
http://www.socom.mil/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 15:46:30 -0400
Subject: YO Andy Baby Scheer tell your lawyer to say Hey to Barry
Bachrach the FBI too will ya?
To: pdownard@fasken.com, "andrew.scheer" <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>,
duncank@progressalberta.ca, julian.porter@julianporterqc.
"justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
"Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "chris.dentremont"
<chris.dentremont@me.com>, barrington@chrisdentremont.com
<zach@zachchurchill.com>, ca@zachchurchill.com,
submit@thepostmillennial.com, melissa@peipcteam.ca,
ernie@peipcteam.ca, barb@peipcteam.ca, tyler@peipcteam.ca,
paul@peipcteam.ca, hilton@peipcteam.ca, jason@peipcteam.ca, bbachrach
<bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>
Cc: "elise.von.scheel@cbc.ca\"
<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, "philip.bryden"
<philip.bryden@gov.ab.ca>, "rod.knecht" <rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>
>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>
>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>> cards?
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>> 6
>>>
>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>> United States Senate
>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>
>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>> tapes.
>>>
>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>
>>> Very truly yours,
>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>
>>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "submit@thepostmillennial.com" <submit@thepostmillennial.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2019 19:26:08 GMT
Subject: Thank you for submitting with The Post Millennial
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Hi David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
Thank you for submitting your article to us. If you receive this
automated message it means we have received your documents.
If you have any questions feel free to reach out to us here:
Ali Taghva • 514-550-7066
Madison Hofmeester • 978-882-1667
Best, The Post Millennial team
Search for Boston mobster victims heads to Nova Scotia
By The Associated Press
Posted Jan 15, 2001 at 12:01 AM
YARMOUTH, Nova Scotia -- Massachusetts state police will travel to
southwestern Nova Scotia Wednesday to examine a site where Boston
mobsters may have buried their victims. Elizabeth Conrad Parent, 43,
whose father Kenneth “Bobby” Conrad has been missing since 1979,
believes he was killed by an associate of South Boston gangster James
“Whitey” Bulger and buried in Canada -- alongside other victims of
Bulger’s group.
Last month, Parent recounted to the Boston Herald that former FBI
agent John J. Connolly Jr. told her almost 20 years ago that her
father was stabbed by Bulger associate Louis R. Litif, and buried in
Nova Scotia. Parent believes her father disappeared after witnessing a
Mafia killing in the basement of a Boston bar.
The Halifax Daily News reported yesterday that four officers will fly
to Yarmouth to discuss with local Royal Canadian Mounted Police a
small parcel of land in rural Deerfield, Nova Scotia. According to
land registry reports, Litif -- who was murdered in Boston in April
1980 -- purchased a house and land in Deerfield in 1971. His widow is
still an absentee landlord of the property.
Sgt. Brian Oldford, a spokesman for the RCMP, said any potential
murder investigation would be handled locally. “We would rely heavily
on (Massachusetts police) for intelligence, but the actual homicide,
as I understand it from reading the newspaper, took place on Canadian
soil and the body’s on Canadian soil,” he said.
Oldford expects the Massachusetts investigators will be in Nova Scotia
for only one day. “It’ll just be a matter of them telling us what they
know and then getting them back on the plane,” he said.
Parent said Connolly told her in a 1983 telephone conversation “a lot
of bodies” were buried at the site.
Bulger, who is on the FBI’s Ten Most Wanted list, was recently
indicted on new charges alleging he was involved in 18 murders.
https://www.thevanguard.ca/
Could mobster arrest shed light on rumour?
The Vanguard
Published: Jun 23, 2011 at midnight
Updated: Sep 30, 2017 at 7:20 a.m.
The RCMP conduct of a dig of a rumoured mob graveyard in Yarmouth
County in October 2001. No human remains were found. TINA COMEAU PHOTO
By Tina Comeau
THE VANGUARD
NovaNewsNow.com
The arrest of notorious mobster James “Whitey” Bulger in Santa Monica,
California, on Wednesday, June 22, has piqued the interest of the RCMP
in Yarmouth who wonder if Bulger’s arrest may eventually shed new
light on a rumoured mob graveyard here.
After being on the FBI’s 10 Most Wanted List and on the lam for around
16 years, the 81-year-old mob king-pin was arrested without incident
after the FBI launched some daytime television ads two days before
seeking the whereabouts of Bulger's girlfriend, Catherine Greig, with
a $100,000 reward offered. There was a $2 million reward for Bulger's
capture.
Corporal Dana Parsons, of the RCMP’s Southwest Major Crime Unit based
in Yarmouth, had not yet heard about Bulger’s arrest when contacted
Thursday morning by the Vanguard. He admitted the arrest is intriguing
in terms of the information it could yield when Bulger is questioned
by American authorities.
Bulger was wanted on charges of racketeering, 19 counts of murder,
conspiracy to commit murder, money laundering, extortion and drug
distribution.
But in these parts his name is of interest given rumours of a mob
graveyard in Yarmouth County.
In 2001, an extensive dig was held at a property located at the corner
of the Saunders Road and Mood Road. For 20 days the RCMP had the
permission to dig a 1.2-acre site where a bartender from Boston was
rumoured to be buried.
The property was turned upside-down and inside-out, and there was even
digging done in the basement of a residence on the scene, but no human
remains were found.
Cpl. Parsons notes that this was not a missing persons file in Nova
Scotia, rather it was a missing persons file originating in the United
States. Therefore it is still up to American authorities to lead any
investigation or inquiries. But this isn’t to say, he says, that if
new substantiated information comes forward that the police here
wouldn’t get involved again.
“It should be their follow-up as far as the interview of Bulger and if
he discloses that a murder occurred up here, than we would become
involved again,” Parsons says.
The man whose remains the RCMP were searching for when they carried
out the dig in October 2001 was South Boston bartender Kenneth Bobby
Conrad, who disappeared in 1979 after allegedly witnessing a mob hit.
The man’s daughter claimed that two years after her father vanished,
an FBI agent by the name of John Connelly had told her that her father
had been lured to Yarmouth County by a mob associate and murdered.
At the time of Conrad’s disappearance, the property was owned by Louis
R. Litif, who was an associate of Bulger. Conrad’s daughter said she
had been told that Litif had killed her father and buried his body at
the property. She said she was told other bodies were buried there as
well.
Getting information from Litif years later was a dead end. In 1980 he
was killed in a gangland slaying in Boston. In 2001 his widow had
given police the permission to dig up the property. She had taken over
part ownership of the property a month before Litif was killed.
(An interesting footnote in this story is Whitey Bulger used to be an
informant for the FBI. But when it was decided in 1994 he had to be
arrested for his crimes, it was FBI agent John Connelly who had tipped
Bulger off, allowing him to escape and remain on the lam for 16 years.
Connelly is serving time for obstruction of justice.)
When the news surfaced in 2000 about a possible mob graveyard in
Yarmouth County – which led to the dig a year later – local residents
of the area said they had heard rumours about alleged mob connections
to the property in the past. So while the news was shocking, it wasn’t
necessarily surprising.
The RCMP dig was not a simple matter of the police going onto the
property with shovels. An infrared device was used to detect
variations or disturbances in the ground. A gas-powered machine with a
spike drum was used to unlock scents beneath the ground for police
dogs. An excavator was brought onto the scene. Even the Yarmouth
County Ground Search and Rescue Team conducted a hands-and-knees
search through wooded areas of the property that had not been dug up
by the excavator.
But in the end, the RCMP could only dig and search the area for which
they had permission. After a week they concluded the dig.
“It’s never been laid to rest because there has never been a resolve
to the disappearance of that body,” says Cpl. Parsons.
On the one hand, there was no body found on the property, so was it
just a rumour and therefore a waste of money and effort? Or on the
other hand, did the dig not go far enough?
Cpl. Parsons says while the RCMP here won’t be looking to lead any new
investigation into the matter, because the file originates in the
United States, he said he may contact U.S. authorities just to touch
base with them and remind them of the assistance the police here
provided in the past.
“We don’t have an open file on a missing persons, our file was an
assistance file to them to see if there was a body up here on that
property in Deerfield,” he says. “Ultimately it’s their lead and what
we would do is follow-up on anything they gave us.”
Yet while Cpl. Parsons stresses the onus would be on the American
authorities, he says ultimately in investigations of missing persons
everyone is seeking the same goal – to bring these investigations to a
successful conclusion and hopefully bring about closure for a family.
And perhaps, in this case, to also put rumours to the test, or put them to rest.
New details emerge about radio host's 1st Puerto Rico court appearance
Trevor Doyle was detained pending trial because he was deemed a 'risk
of flight and danger to the community'
Hadeel Ibrahim · CBC News · Posted: Apr 10, 2019 3:50 PM AT
Prominent radio host Trevor Doyle is accused of sexual enticement of a
minor after being arrested in Puerto Rico. (Trevor Doyle/Twitter)
Court documents obtained by CBC News show new details of Trevor
Doyle's detention hearing on Monday in Puerto Rico.
The Fredericton radio host charged with sexual enticement of a minor
was detained pending a trial "on the basis of risk of flight and
danger to the community," said the minutes filed by the court
reporter.
According to the minutes, Doyle's defence attorney, Jesus Hernandez,
did not request conditions of release or a bail hearing but reserved
his right to reopen the detention hearing at a later date.
Radio host accused of child sex crime in Puerto Rico could face
long path to justice
Radio host accused of arranging for sex with minor detained in Puerto Rico
Doyle is a longtime host for Capital FM in Fredericton.
On Monday, he also filed a waiver of a preliminary hearing, which
means his case will go directly to trial. This does not mean an
immediate trial, however, and Doyle still has not entered a plea.
"The court approved the waiver and found probable cause as to the
charge contained in the criminal complaint," the minutes said.
A United States District Court document showing Trevor Doyle waived
his right to a preliminary hearing. (United States District Court)
The detention hearing lasted 15 minutes Monday.
Doyle was arrested on April 3 after an FBI sting operation involving
an agent posing as a 13-year-old girl. Doyle allegedly messaged the
agent on two separate apps for several days, ultimately arranging a
meeting at Pine Grove Beach in Isla Verde for oral sex.
The prosecution alleges Doyle believed he was communicating with a
13-year-old girl because the agent brought up her age multiple times.
Evidence submitted by the FBI allege he brought up her age once.
Medical conditions
As soon as he was arrested, the detention centre was advised that
Doyle suffers from anxiety, depression and high blood pressure.
Court documents posted Tuesday but signed on April 3 advised the
Metropolitan Detention Centre in Guaynabo, about 16 kilometres south
of San Juan, that Doyle "is being or has been treated and/or suffers
from" the ailments.
Trevor Doyle is being held at the Metropolitan Detention Centre in
Guaynabo, about 16 kilometres south of San Juan. (BOP.gov/submitted)
A spokesperson for Bell Media, which owns Capital FM, did not comment
on Doyle's legal situation but confirmed he's been suspended from his
job as host of the morning show.
The Canadian consulate in Puerto Rico has been notified of Doyle's
arrest and detention.
Trevor Doyle was a morning show radio host on 106.9 Capital FM for
years. (Trevor Doyle/Twitter)
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 23:54:14 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Daniel Froomkin I just called
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 19:53:09 -0400
Subject: Attn Daniel Froomkin I just called
To: froomkin@whitehousewatch.com, dan@froomkin.com, mdcohen212
<mdcohen212@gmail.com>
Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca
pablo.rodriguez@parl.gc.ca, Newsroom@globeandmail.com
Dan FroomkinVerified account
@froomkin
Editor of White House Watch. Previously seen @theintercept @huffpost
@washingtonpost email me at froomkin@whitehousewatch.com
Daniel Froomkin
4315 39th St., N.W.
Washington, DC 20016
2023630309
Email: dan@froomkin.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Michael Cohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:15:14 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA ATTN Pierre-Luc.Dusseault I just
called and left a message for you
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
directed to 646-853-0114.
______________________________
This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its
affiliates.Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an
electronic signature under applicable law.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 12:09:11 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Attn Al Burke I just called about your pal Assange
To: j.robinson@doughtystreet.co.uk
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 09:09:29 -0400
Subject: Attn Al Burke I just called about your pal Assange
To: editor@nnn.se, matt.kwong@cbc.ca, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news-tips <news-tips@nytimes.com>, news
<news@hilltimes.com>, "Neil.Macdonald" <Neil.Macdonald@cbc.ca>,
newsroom <newsroom@theguardian.pe.ca>, "ed.pilkington"
<ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
<letters@globeandmail.com>, rfife <rfife@globeandmail.com>,
"Jody.Wilson-Raybould" <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
"Jane.Philpott" <Jane.Philpott@parl.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen"
<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "Nathalie.Drouin"
<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
How the liberal tide turned against Julian Assange and WikiLeaks
Assange 'proselytized about radical transparency' but some critics
call him a 'pawn'
Matt Kwong · CBC News · Posted: Apr 11, 2019 11:36 PM ET
"Assange has a loyal defender in Swedish journalist Al Burke, who has
spoken with Assange and visited him in London a few years ago. Burke
suspects media outlets and the Central Intelligence Agency will seek
to further tarnish the WikiLeaks founder.
"I think he will be besmirched. He will be regarded as various
negative things. Like a pawn, a rapist, and so on and so forth. I
don't think he'll get a fair shake."
Burke called the rape accusations against Assange "manufactured" and
believes Ecuador's decision to revoke the WikiLeaks founder's asylum
was motivated by a desire to distract from corruption allegations
faced by the Ecuadorian president.
"A little part of me found almost relief because he's now going to get
some fresh air and some sunlight," Burke said of Assange's arrest and
eviction from the embassy.
"In terms of his physical condition, it's clearly an improvement for
him. But in many other ways, it's a disaster."
https://www.nnn.se/info/
Within Sweden: 08 - 731 9200
Outside Sweden: +46/8 - 731 9200
editor@nnn.se
https://davidraymondamos3.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 13:41:38 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Barry Pollack, Theresa May, Zachary
Terwilliger and Tracy McCormick Re the imprisonments of Chelsea
Manning and Julian Assange
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
mailto:publiceditor@
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 09:40:29 -0400
Subject: Attn Barry Pollack, Theresa May, Zachary Terwilliger and
Tracy McCormick Re the imprisonments of Chelsea Manning and Julian
Assange
To: "theresa.may.mp" <theresa.may.mp@parliament.uk>
<mayt@parliament.uk>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, Zachary.terwilliger@usdoj.gov,
tracy.mccormick@usdoj.gov, joshua.stueve@usdoj.gov, "william.barr"
<william.barr@usdoj.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, bpollack@robbinsrussell.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
"ed.pilkington" <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>
<news-tips@nytimes.com>, news <news@hilltimes.com>
https://www.usatoday.com/
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange arrested in London to face hacking
conspiracy charge in the US
Sean Rossman, Doug Stanglin and Bart Jansen, USATNetwork Published
5:50 a.m. ET April 11, 2019
'Barry Pollack, a U.S. lawyer for Assange, criticized the arrest and
said Assange would need medical treatment that had been denied for
seven years.
"It is bitterly disappointing that a country would allow someone to
whom it has extended citizenship and asylum to be arrested in its
embassy," Pollack said." Once his health care needs have been
addressed, the UK courts will need to resolve what appears to be an
unprecedented effort by the United States seeking to extradite a
foreign journalist to face criminal charges for publishing truthful
information."
Tel: 202.775.4514
Fax: 202.775.4510
bpollack@robbinsrussell.com
https://www.theguardian.com/
Theresa May has given a statement about Assange. Speaking to the
Commons before updating MPs on the Brexit delay, she said:
I am sure that the whole house will welcome the news this morning
that the Metropolitan Police have arrested Julian Assange – arrested
for breach of bail after nearly seven years in the Ecuadorian embassy.
He has also been arrested in relation to an extradition request from
the United States’ authorities. This is now a legal matter before the
courts. The home secretary will make a statement on this later, but I
would like to thank the Metropolitan Police for carrying out their
duties with great professionalism and to welcome the cooperation of
the Ecuadorian government in bringing this matter to a resolution.
This goes to show that, in the United Kingdom, no one is above the
law.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-
Department of Justice
U.S. Attorney’s Office
Eastern District of Virginia
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Thursday, April 11, 2019
WikiLeaks Founder Charged in Computer Hacking Conspiracy
ALEXANDRIA, Va. – Julian P. Assange, 47, the founder of WikiLeaks, was
arrested today in the United Kingdom pursuant to the U.S./UK
Extradition Treaty, in connection with a federal charge of conspiracy
to commit computer intrusion for agreeing to break a password to a
classified U.S. government computer.
According to court documents unsealed today, the charge relates to
Assange’s alleged role in one of the largest compromises of classified
information in the history of the United States.
The indictment alleges that in March 2010, Assange engaged in a
conspiracy with Chelsea Manning, a former intelligence analyst in the
U.S. Army, to assist Manning in cracking a password stored on U.S.
Department of Defense computers connected to the Secret Internet
Protocol Network (SIPRNet), a U.S. government network used for
classified documents and communications. Manning, who had access to
the computers in connection with her duties as an intelligence
analyst, was using the computers to download classified records to
transmit to WikiLeaks. Cracking the password would have allowed
Manning to log on to the computers under a username that did not
belong to her. Such a deceptive measure would have made it more
difficult for investigators to determine the source of the illegal
disclosures.
During the conspiracy, Manning and Assange engaged in real-time
discussions regarding Manning’s transmission of classified records to
Assange. The discussions also reflect Assange actively encouraging
Manning to provide more information. During an exchange, Manning told
Assange that “after this upload, that’s all I really have got left.”
To which Assange replied, “curious eyes never run dry in my
experience.”
Assange is charged with conspiracy to commit computer intrusion and is
presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable
doubt. If convicted, he faces a maximum penalty of five years in
prison. Actual sentences for federal crimes are typically less than
the maximum penalties. A federal district court judge will determine
any sentence after taking into account the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines
and other statutory factors.
G. Zachary Terwilliger, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of
Virginia, John C. Demers, Assistant Attorney General for National
Security, and Nancy McNamara, Assistant Director in Charge of the
FBI’s Washington Field Office, made the announcement after the charges
were unsealed. First Assistant U.S. Attorney Tracy Doherty-McCormick,
Assistant U.S. Attorneys Kellen S. Dwyer, Thomas W. Traxler and Gordon
D. Kromberg, and Trial Attorneys Matthew R. Walczewski and Nicholas O.
Hunter of the Justice Department’s National Security Division are
prosecuting the case.
The extradition will be handled by the Department of Justice’s Office
of International Affairs.
A copy of this press release is located on the website of the U.S.
Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia. Related court
documents and information are located on the website of the District
Court for the Eastern District of Virginia or on PACER by searching
for Case No. 1:18-cr-111.
An indictment contains allegations that a defendant has committed a
crime. Every defendant is presumed to be innocent until and unless
proven guilty in court.
Attachment(s):
Download assange_indictment.pdf
Topic(s):
Cyber Crime
National Security
Component(s):
USAO - Virginia, Eastern
Contact:
Joshua Stueve
Director of Communications
joshua.stueve@usdoj.gov
https://www.justice.gov/usao-
Meet the U.S. Attorney
G. Zachary Terwilliger
Department of Justice
G. Zachary Terwilliger is the 62nd United States Attorney for the
Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA).
As the chief federal law enforcement officer in EDVA, Terwilliger
supervises the prosecution of all federal crimes and the litigation of
all civil matters in which the United States has an interest. As U.S.
Attorney, Terwilliger leads a staff of over 250 prosecutors, civil
litigators, and support personnel located in Alexandria, Newport News,
Norfolk, and Richmond.
Prior to his appointment as U.S. Attorney on May 25, 2018, Terwilliger
served as an Associate Deputy Attorney General, and Chief of Staff in
the Office of the Deputy Attorney General at the Department of
Justice. In that role, Terwilliger was a principal advisor to senior
Department of Justice leadership in areas such as corporate
compliance, federal, state and local law enforcement cooperation,
violent crime reduction, and other critical matters.
Credentialed media members may contact Joshua Stueve, Director of
Communications for the Eastern District of Virginia, at:
joshua.stueve@usdoj.gov or call 703-842-4050
By Telephone
Alexandria: (703) 299-3700
Newport News: (757) 591-4000
Norfolk: (757) 441-6331
Richmond: (804) 819-5400
https://davidraymondamos3.
Thursday, 11 April 2019
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange arrested, U.K. police say
Well I contacted and called Manning's lawyer first and it appeared
that she didn't care about what I was trying to tell her. So I quickly
gave up
https://moatlaw.com/contact-
Contact Me
If you are interested in a consultation, please leave your name,
email, and a good number at which to reach you, along with a brief
indication of what you want to meet about. Please do not leave any
other information in this form, as it will not be considered
privileged!
Message Sent (go back)
Name: David Raymond Amos
Email: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Phone Number: https://davidraymondamos3.
Subject of Requested Meeting: Perhaps we should discuss Manning's concerns ASAP?
https://davidraymondamos3.
Thursday, 11 April 2019
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange arrested, U.K. police say
https://twitter.com/
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Kathryn98967631 and 47 others
Methinks Manning's and Assange's lawyers should read paragraphs 82 and
83 of my lawsuit (Federal Court File No.T-1557-15) ASAP N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.
#nbpoli #cdnpoli
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
Moira Meltzer-Cohen
277 Broadway Suite 1501,
NY, NY 10007
t: 347.248.6771
https://twitter.com/
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Kathryn98967631 and 47 others
Methinks Manning's and Assange's lawyers should read paragraphs 82 and
83 of my lawsuit (Federal Court File No.T-1557-15) ASAP N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.
#nbpoli #cdnpoli
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange arrested, U.K. police say
469 Comments
David R. Amos
Methinks Mr Assange's lawyers should read paragraph 83 of my lawsuit
(Federal Court File No.T-1557-15) ASAP N'esy Pas?
Doug McComber
Reply to @David R. Amos: Methinks with your bright avatar and litany
of "Methinks" posts on every article (and your lawsuit) that you are
an attention seeker.
Andre Garafolo
Reply David R. Amosto @Doug McComber: Annoying, isn't it.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Doug McComber: Methinks you should have read paragraph 82 of
my lawsuit before you offered your two bit worth N'esy Pas?
David R. Amos
Reply to @Andre Garafolo: Cry me a river
https://davidraymondamos3.
Friday, 18 September 2015
David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15
Court File No. T-1557-15
FEDERAL COURT
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Plaintiff
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
82. The Plaintiff states that any politician or police officer should
have seen enough of Barry Winter’s WordPress blog by June 22, 2015
particularly after the very unnecessary demise of two men in Alberta
because of the incompetence of the EPS. Barry Winters was blogging
about the EPS using battering ram in order to execute a warrant for a
250 dollar bylaw offence at the same time Professor Kris Wells
revealed in a televised interview that the EPS member who was killed
was the one investigating the cyber harassment of him. It was obvious
why the police and politicians ignored all the death threats, sexual
harassment, cyberbullying and hate speech of a proud Zionist who
claimed to be a former CF officer who now working for the Department
of National Defence (DND). It is well known that no politician in
Canada is allowed to sit in Parliament as a member of the major
parties unless they support Israel. Since 2002 the Plaintiff made it
well known that he does not support Israeli actions and was against
the American plan to make war on Iraq. On Aril 1, 2003 within two
weeks of the beginning of the War on Iraq, the US Secret Service
threatened to practice extraordinary rendition because false
allegations of a Presidential threat were made against him by an
American court. However, the Americans and the Crown cannot deny that
what he said in two courts on April 1, 2003 because he published the
recordings of what was truly said as soon as he got the court tapes.
The RCMP knows those words can still be heard on the Internet today.
In 2009, the Plaintiff began to complain of Barry Winters about
something far more important to Canada as nation because of Winters’
bragging of being one of 24 CF officers who assisted the Americans in
the planning the War on Iraq in 2002. In the Plaintiff’s humble
opinion the mandate of the DND is Defence not Attack. He is not so
naive to think that such plans of war do not occur but if Barry
Winters was in fact one of the CF officers who did so then he broke
his oath to the Crown the instant he bragged of it in his blog. If
Winters was never an officer in the CF then he broke the law by
impersonating an officer. The Plaintiff downloaded the emails of the
Privy Council about Wikileaks. The bragging of Barry Winters should
have been investigated in 2009 before CBC reported that documents
released by WikiLeaks supported his information about Canadian
involvement in the War on Iraq.
83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
five years after he began his bragging:
January 13, 2015
This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
December 8, 2014
Why Canada Stood Tall!
Friday, October 3, 2014
Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
Stupid Justin Trudeau
Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
campaign of 2006.
What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An
ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear
and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,”
or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of
terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states
“moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of
Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an
ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the
Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty
was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the
amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time
denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time
self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of
“world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the
G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious
behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister
Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully
cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits
are not.
Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal
mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the
world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy”
David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security
and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can
and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing
“humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war
criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending
tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
“the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing,
marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian
military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern
equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are
antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five
years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that
won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin
Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not
served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social
democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and
other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet
these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to
other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security,
and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before
shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now
From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and
the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still
alive
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply
to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
>>>>
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the
War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil,
Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.
william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca,
milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca,
sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari
<smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
susan@blueskystrategygroup.com
eugene@blueskystrategygroup.
Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice" <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin"
<terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower
<whistleblower@ctv.ca>
I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David
Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's
Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on
CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To
be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested
that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise
if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else
about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact that your
old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English
never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is
interesting though
http://www.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/
Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad
Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a
shy political animal
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
Enjoy Mr Weston
http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/
"But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
including a Canadian general.
That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was
also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
http://baconfat53.blogspot.
"I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
"veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
into the US policy.
At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was
never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
were deployed WMD.
Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
(and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions
are to met before US troop can redeploy? Prime Minister Jean Chretien
and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of
Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them
correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the
George W Bush administration was onerous
American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
....not necessarily in that order. "
You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
http://www.socom.mil/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 15:46:30 -0400
Subject: YO Andy Baby Scheer tell your lawyer to say Hey to Barry
Bachrach the FBI too will ya?
To: pdownard@fasken.com, "andrew.scheer" <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>,
duncank@progressalberta.ca, julian.porter@julianporterqc.
"justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
"Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "chris.dentremont"
<chris.dentremont@me.com>, barrington@chrisdentremont.com
<zach@zachchurchill.com>, ca@zachchurchill.com,
submit@thepostmillennial.com, melissa@peipcteam.ca,
ernie@peipcteam.ca, barb@peipcteam.ca, tyler@peipcteam.ca,
paul@peipcteam.ca, hilton@peipcteam.ca, jason@peipcteam.ca, bbachrach
<bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>
Cc: "elise.von.scheel@cbc.ca\"
<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, "philip.bryden"
<philip.bryden@gov.ab.ca>, "rod.knecht" <rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>
>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>
>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>> cards?
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>> 6
>>>
>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>> United States Senate
>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>
>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>> tapes.
>>>
>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>
>>> Very truly yours,
>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>
>>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "submit@thepostmillennial.com" <submit@thepostmillennial.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2019 19:26:08 GMT
Subject: Thank you for submitting with The Post Millennial
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Hi David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
Thank you for submitting your article to us. If you receive this
automated message it means we have received your documents.
If you have any questions feel free to reach out to us here:
Ali Taghva • 514-550-7066
Madison Hofmeester • 978-882-1667
Best, The Post Millennial team
Search for Boston mobster victims heads to Nova Scotia
By The Associated Press
Posted Jan 15, 2001 at 12:01 AM
YARMOUTH, Nova Scotia -- Massachusetts state police will travel to
southwestern Nova Scotia Wednesday to examine a site where Boston
mobsters may have buried their victims. Elizabeth Conrad Parent, 43,
whose father Kenneth “Bobby” Conrad has been missing since 1979,
believes he was killed by an associate of South Boston gangster James
“Whitey” Bulger and buried in Canada -- alongside other victims of
Bulger’s group.
Last month, Parent recounted to the Boston Herald that former FBI
agent John J. Connolly Jr. told her almost 20 years ago that her
father was stabbed by Bulger associate Louis R. Litif, and buried in
Nova Scotia. Parent believes her father disappeared after witnessing a
Mafia killing in the basement of a Boston bar.
The Halifax Daily News reported yesterday that four officers will fly
to Yarmouth to discuss with local Royal Canadian Mounted Police a
small parcel of land in rural Deerfield, Nova Scotia. According to
land registry reports, Litif -- who was murdered in Boston in April
1980 -- purchased a house and land in Deerfield in 1971. His widow is
still an absentee landlord of the property.
Sgt. Brian Oldford, a spokesman for the RCMP, said any potential
murder investigation would be handled locally. “We would rely heavily
on (Massachusetts police) for intelligence, but the actual homicide,
as I understand it from reading the newspaper, took place on Canadian
soil and the body’s on Canadian soil,” he said.
Oldford expects the Massachusetts investigators will be in Nova Scotia
for only one day. “It’ll just be a matter of them telling us what they
know and then getting them back on the plane,” he said.
Parent said Connolly told her in a 1983 telephone conversation “a lot
of bodies” were buried at the site.
Bulger, who is on the FBI’s Ten Most Wanted list, was recently
indicted on new charges alleging he was involved in 18 murders.
https://www.thevanguard.ca/
Could mobster arrest shed light on rumour?
The Vanguard
Published: Jun 23, 2011 at midnight
Updated: Sep 30, 2017 at 7:20 a.m.
The RCMP conduct of a dig of a rumoured mob graveyard in Yarmouth
County in October 2001. No human remains were found. TINA COMEAU PHOTO
By Tina Comeau
THE VANGUARD
NovaNewsNow.com
The arrest of notorious mobster James “Whitey” Bulger in Santa Monica,
California, on Wednesday, June 22, has piqued the interest of the RCMP
in Yarmouth who wonder if Bulger’s arrest may eventually shed new
light on a rumoured mob graveyard here.
After being on the FBI’s 10 Most Wanted List and on the lam for around
16 years, the 81-year-old mob king-pin was arrested without incident
after the FBI launched some daytime television ads two days before
seeking the whereabouts of Bulger's girlfriend, Catherine Greig, with
a $100,000 reward offered. There was a $2 million reward for Bulger's
capture.
Corporal Dana Parsons, of the RCMP’s Southwest Major Crime Unit based
in Yarmouth, had not yet heard about Bulger’s arrest when contacted
Thursday morning by the Vanguard. He admitted the arrest is intriguing
in terms of the information it could yield when Bulger is questioned
by American authorities.
Bulger was wanted on charges of racketeering, 19 counts of murder,
conspiracy to commit murder, money laundering, extortion and drug
distribution.
But in these parts his name is of interest given rumours of a mob
graveyard in Yarmouth County.
In 2001, an extensive dig was held at a property located at the corner
of the Saunders Road and Mood Road. For 20 days the RCMP had the
permission to dig a 1.2-acre site where a bartender from Boston was
rumoured to be buried.
The property was turned upside-down and inside-out, and there was even
digging done in the basement of a residence on the scene, but no human
remains were found.
Cpl. Parsons notes that this was not a missing persons file in Nova
Scotia, rather it was a missing persons file originating in the United
States. Therefore it is still up to American authorities to lead any
investigation or inquiries. But this isn’t to say, he says, that if
new substantiated information comes forward that the police here
wouldn’t get involved again.
“It should be their follow-up as far as the interview of Bulger and if
he discloses that a murder occurred up here, than we would become
involved again,” Parsons says.
The man whose remains the RCMP were searching for when they carried
out the dig in October 2001 was South Boston bartender Kenneth Bobby
Conrad, who disappeared in 1979 after allegedly witnessing a mob hit.
The man’s daughter claimed that two years after her father vanished,
an FBI agent by the name of John Connelly had told her that her father
had been lured to Yarmouth County by a mob associate and murdered.
At the time of Conrad’s disappearance, the property was owned by Louis
R. Litif, who was an associate of Bulger. Conrad’s daughter said she
had been told that Litif had killed her father and buried his body at
the property. She said she was told other bodies were buried there as
well.
Getting information from Litif years later was a dead end. In 1980 he
was killed in a gangland slaying in Boston. In 2001 his widow had
given police the permission to dig up the property. She had taken over
part ownership of the property a month before Litif was killed.
(An interesting footnote in this story is Whitey Bulger used to be an
informant for the FBI. But when it was decided in 1994 he had to be
arrested for his crimes, it was FBI agent John Connelly who had tipped
Bulger off, allowing him to escape and remain on the lam for 16 years.
Connelly is serving time for obstruction of justice.)
When the news surfaced in 2000 about a possible mob graveyard in
Yarmouth County – which led to the dig a year later – local residents
of the area said they had heard rumours about alleged mob connections
to the property in the past. So while the news was shocking, it wasn’t
necessarily surprising.
The RCMP dig was not a simple matter of the police going onto the
property with shovels. An infrared device was used to detect
variations or disturbances in the ground. A gas-powered machine with a
spike drum was used to unlock scents beneath the ground for police
dogs. An excavator was brought onto the scene. Even the Yarmouth
County Ground Search and Rescue Team conducted a hands-and-knees
search through wooded areas of the property that had not been dug up
by the excavator.
But in the end, the RCMP could only dig and search the area for which
they had permission. After a week they concluded the dig.
“It’s never been laid to rest because there has never been a resolve
to the disappearance of that body,” says Cpl. Parsons.
On the one hand, there was no body found on the property, so was it
just a rumour and therefore a waste of money and effort? Or on the
other hand, did the dig not go far enough?
Cpl. Parsons says while the RCMP here won’t be looking to lead any new
investigation into the matter, because the file originates in the
United States, he said he may contact U.S. authorities just to touch
base with them and remind them of the assistance the police here
provided in the past.
“We don’t have an open file on a missing persons, our file was an
assistance file to them to see if there was a body up here on that
property in Deerfield,” he says. “Ultimately it’s their lead and what
we would do is follow-up on anything they gave us.”
Yet while Cpl. Parsons stresses the onus would be on the American
authorities, he says ultimately in investigations of missing persons
everyone is seeking the same goal – to bring these investigations to a
successful conclusion and hopefully bring about closure for a family.
And perhaps, in this case, to also put rumours to the test, or put them to rest.
New details emerge about radio host's 1st Puerto Rico court appearance
Trevor Doyle was detained pending trial because he was deemed a 'risk
of flight and danger to the community'
Hadeel Ibrahim · CBC News · Posted: Apr 10, 2019 3:50 PM AT
Prominent radio host Trevor Doyle is accused of sexual enticement of a
minor after being arrested in Puerto Rico. (Trevor Doyle/Twitter)
Court documents obtained by CBC News show new details of Trevor
Doyle's detention hearing on Monday in Puerto Rico.
The Fredericton radio host charged with sexual enticement of a minor
was detained pending a trial "on the basis of risk of flight and
danger to the community," said the minutes filed by the court
reporter.
According to the minutes, Doyle's defence attorney, Jesus Hernandez,
did not request conditions of release or a bail hearing but reserved
his right to reopen the detention hearing at a later date.
Radio host accused of child sex crime in Puerto Rico could face
long path to justice
Radio host accused of arranging for sex with minor detained in Puerto Rico
Doyle is a longtime host for Capital FM in Fredericton.
On Monday, he also filed a waiver of a preliminary hearing, which
means his case will go directly to trial. This does not mean an
immediate trial, however, and Doyle still has not entered a plea.
"The court approved the waiver and found probable cause as to the
charge contained in the criminal complaint," the minutes said.
A United States District Court document showing Trevor Doyle waived
his right to a preliminary hearing. (United States District Court)
The detention hearing lasted 15 minutes Monday.
Doyle was arrested on April 3 after an FBI sting operation involving
an agent posing as a 13-year-old girl. Doyle allegedly messaged the
agent on two separate apps for several days, ultimately arranging a
meeting at Pine Grove Beach in Isla Verde for oral sex.
The prosecution alleges Doyle believed he was communicating with a
13-year-old girl because the agent brought up her age multiple times.
Evidence submitted by the FBI allege he brought up her age once.
Medical conditions
As soon as he was arrested, the detention centre was advised that
Doyle suffers from anxiety, depression and high blood pressure.
Court documents posted Tuesday but signed on April 3 advised the
Metropolitan Detention Centre in Guaynabo, about 16 kilometres south
of San Juan, that Doyle "is being or has been treated and/or suffers
from" the ailments.
Trevor Doyle is being held at the Metropolitan Detention Centre in
Guaynabo, about 16 kilometres south of San Juan. (BOP.gov/submitted)
A spokesperson for Bell Media, which owns Capital FM, did not comment
on Doyle's legal situation but confirmed he's been suspended from his
job as host of the morning show.
The Canadian consulate in Puerto Rico has been notified of Doyle's
arrest and detention.
Trevor Doyle was a morning show radio host on 106.9 Capital FM for
years. (Trevor Doyle/Twitter)
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
How the liberal tide turned against Julian Assange and WikiLeaks
Assange 'proselytized about radical transparency' but some critics call him a 'pawn'
To some, he was a truth seeker bent on exposing government misdeeds. To others, he was a high-tech menace who helped Russian hackers deliver the 2016 U.S. presidential election to Donald Trump.
But Julian Assange hasn't necessarily changed, his critics say, even if perceptions of the WikiLeaks co-founder have.
After evidently overstaying his welcome as an asylum-seeker at the Ecuadorian embassy in London, Assange now faces extradition to the U.S. and the possibility of up to five years in an American prison. A British judge on Thursday found the 47-year-old Australian computer programmer guilty of jumping bail in the U.K., after Ecuador revoked his asylum status and opened the doors to London police for his arrest.
The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Virginia has charged Assange with "conspiracy to commit computer intrusion" related to the leaking of hundreds of thousands of U.S. diplomatic cables in 2010.
Heavily bearded and pale as he was hauled out of the Ecuadorian embassy by officers, Assange reportedly shouted, "The U.K. must resist."
CBC News
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange arrested
Video posted online by
Ruptly, part of Russia Today, showed at least eight men forcibly
escorting Julian Assange out of Ecuador's embassy in London. 0:34
If there was an inflection point, it was around Assange's role in leaking Democratic National Committee emails in July 2016, said Lisa Lynch, who has studied WikiLeaks as an associate professor of media communications at Drew University in New Jersey.
"What happened in 2016 broke a lot people's hearts."
According to an indictment by the U.S. special counsel last summer, Russian government hackers stole tens of thousands of emails from the campaign of Trump's presidential Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton before passing them on to WikiLeaks for publication.
Trump made it clear he was game.
"I love WikiLeaks," he proclaimed during a campaign in which he would go on to cite the website more than 160 times.
In 2017, Assange denied to Fox News host Sean Hannity that the hacked documents came from the Russian government. Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team found differently, moving in 2018 to indict 12 Russian intelligence officers over the DNC and Clinton campaign hacking.
'Assange didn't change'
Liberal outrage over the Trump-Assange alliance showed a
misunderstanding of who Assange was all along, despite his reputation in
the media as a darling of the libertarian left, Lynch said.
"I find Assange to have been a pawn in a lot of games," she said. "I think of him more as a tragic figure."
WikiLeaks made its splash in 2010 with the release of "Collateral Murder," leaked footage showing a 2007 Baghdad airstrike that showed the purportedly "indiscriminate" killings that left a dozen people dead, including two Reuters journalists.
Recognizing the value in such leaks, investigative journalists with publications such as the Guardian and the New York Times partnered with WikiLeaks in 2010 to publish hundreds of thousands of U.S. diplomatic cables, some of which were classified and redacted by publications to preserve sensitive intelligence information. The incident became known as CableGate.
Nearly a decade since Collateral Murder, the libertarian and liberal progressive embrace of Assange has softened, Lynch said.
"Right now, yes — we all think of Assange very differently."
WikiLeaks did not prove to be the engine of democratic change that liberal idealists had hoped for, she said. And then came the 2016 election.
"This was designed to elect Donald Trump," he asserted.
Assange's relationships with notable journalists have also deteriorated, reportedly owing in part to what former collaborators described as a combative style and paranoia. The Guardian broke off its partnership with him in 2010, reportedly after he threatened legal action over the publication of a batch of documents the newspaper had obtained outside of WikiLeaks.
The Oscar-winning filmmaker Laura Poitras, who had previously won the trust of National Security Administration whistleblower Edward Snowden and interviewed him for the film CitizenFour, soon soured on Assange during the filming of her Assange-focused documentary, Risk. One scene captures Assange brushing off the allegations of two Swedish women who accused him in 2010 of sexual assault, calling them lesbians who he believes are involved in a "radical feminist conspiracy." The charges were later dropped.
From 'freedom fighter' to 'destructive conduit'?
Assange was "already in a sinkhole" over reports he had alienated people in newsrooms with an overbearing style," said David Szakonyi, a Russia specialist and professor at George Washington University.
"Then you add in the rape accusations."
Among liberals, support for Assange has plummeted since he first came to the world's attention as "a combination of investigative journalist, plus freedom fighter, plus transparency advocate," he said.
Today, Szakonyi sees Assange as a gear in the Russia propaganda machine who has fashioned himself into a "destructive conduit for information that maybe shouldn't have been out in the public sphere." He questions the civic value behind publishing the stolen DNC emails, which showed the party leadership's bias toward Clinton for the Democratic nomination over her then-rival Bernie Sanders.
Palmer, a Sanders supporter in 2016, looks back on 2010 as an era in which WikiLeaks "was courageous, heroic and very skilful" in how they released data.
"They were creating a new way of doing journalism, or assisting journalism by making it easier for people who witnessed terrible crimes to alert the world about them," he said.
While he admires Assange for "contributions of enormous value," he said the hacktivist's possible contribution to Trump's victory in 2016 "is regarded with a lot of disgust."
Assange has a loyal defender in Swedish journalist Al Burke, who has spoken with Assange and visited him in London a few years ago. Burke suspects media outlets and the Central Intelligence Agency will seek to further tarnish the WikiLeaks founder.
"I think he will be besmirched. He will be regarded as various negative things. Like a pawn, a rapist, and so on and so forth. I don't think he'll get a fair shake."
Burke called the rape accusations against Assange "manufactured" and believes Ecuador's decision to revoke the WikiLeaks founder's asylum was motivated by a desire to distract from corruption allegations faced by the Ecuadorian president.
"A little part of me found almost relief because he's now going to get some fresh air and some sunlight," Burke said of Assange's arrest and eviction from the embassy.
"In terms of his physical condition, it's clearly an improvement for him. But in many other ways, it's a disaster."
About the Author
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 12:09:11 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Attn Al Burke I just called about your pal Assange
To: j.robinson@doughtystreet.co.uk, paulhare@bu.edu
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Jensen, Jan" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:09:36 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Al Burke I just called about your pal Assange
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I will be away from the office and not returning until Monday April
15, 2019. If you require immediate assistance, please contact my
assistant at (902) 407 7461..
---------- Original message ----------
From: autoreply@globeandmail.com
Date: 12 Apr 2019 09:10:36 -0400
Subject: AutoReply: Attn Al Burke I just called about your pal Assange
To:
All letters, articles, comments, and other material submitted for
publication may be published, distributed and stored by The Globe, its
assignees and its licensees in whole or in part, in print or by any
other means, including but not limited to electronic, worldwide and in
perpetuity, without compensation to the author.
Please do not respond to this message, it is sent from an unattended mailbox.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 09:09:29 -0400
Subject: Attn Al Burke I just called about your pal Assange
To: editor@nnn.se, matt.kwong@cbc.ca, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
news-tips@nytimes.com, news@hilltimes.com, Neil.Macdonald@cbc.ca,
newsroom@theguardian.pe.ca, ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk,
Robert.Jones@cbc.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
rfife@globeandmail.com, Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
Jane.Philpott@parl.gc.ca, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca,
Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
How the liberal tide turned against Julian Assange and WikiLeaks
Assange 'proselytized about radical transparency' but some critics
call him a 'pawn'
Matt Kwong · CBC News · Posted: Apr 11, 2019 11:36 PM ET
"Assange has a loyal defender in Swedish journalist Al Burke, who has
spoken with Assange and visited him in London a few years ago. Burke
suspects media outlets and the Central Intelligence Agency will seek
to further tarnish the WikiLeaks founder.
"I think he will be besmirched. He will be regarded as various
negative things. Like a pawn, a rapist, and so on and so forth. I
don't think he'll get a fair shake."
Burke called the rape accusations against Assange "manufactured" and
believes Ecuador's decision to revoke the WikiLeaks founder's asylum
was motivated by a desire to distract from corruption allegations
faced by the Ecuadorian president.
"A little part of me found almost relief because he's now going to get
some fresh air and some sunlight," Burke said of Assange's arrest and
eviction from the embassy.
"In terms of his physical condition, it's clearly an improvement for
him. But in many other ways, it's a disaster."
https://www.nnn.se/info/
Within Sweden: 08 - 731 9200
Outside Sweden: +46/8 - 731 9200
editor@nnn.se
https://davidraymondamos3.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 13:41:38 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Barry Pollack, Theresa May, Zachary
Terwilliger and Tracy McCormick Re the imprisonments of Chelsea
Manning and Julian Assange
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
mailto:publiceditor@
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 09:40:29 -0400
Subject: Attn Barry Pollack, Theresa May, Zachary Terwilliger and Tracy
McCormick Re the imprisonments of Chelsea Manning and Julian Assange
To: theresa.may.mp@parliament.uk, mayt@parliament.uk, pm@pm.gc.ca,
Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Zachary.terwilliger@usdoj.gov,
tracy.mccormick@usdoj.gov, joshua.stueve@usdoj.gov,
william.barr@usdoj.gov, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca,
CC: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk, news-tips@nytimes.com, news@hilltimes.com
https://www.usatoday.com/
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange arrested in London to face hacking
conspiracy charge in the US
Sean Rossman, Doug Stanglin and Bart Jansen, USATNetwork Published
5:50 a.m. ET April 11, 2019
'Barry Pollack, a U.S. lawyer for Assange, criticized the arrest and
said Assange would need medical treatment that had been denied for
seven years.
"It is bitterly disappointing that a country would allow someone to
whom it has extended citizenship and asylum to be arrested in its
embassy," Pollack said." Once his health care needs have been
addressed, the UK courts will need to resolve what appears to be an
unprecedented effort by the United States seeking to extradite a
foreign journalist to face criminal charges for publishing truthful
information."
Tel: 202.775.4514
Fax: 202.775.4510
bpollack@robbinsrussell.com
https://www.theguardian.com/
Theresa May has given a statement about Assange. Speaking to the
Commons before updating MPs on the Brexit delay, she said:
I am sure that the whole house will welcome the news this morning
that the Metropolitan Police have arrested Julian Assange – arrested
for breach of bail after nearly seven years in the Ecuadorian embassy.
He has also been arrested in relation to an extradition request from
the United States’ authorities. This is now a legal matter before the
courts. The home secretary will make a statement on this later, but I
would like to thank the Metropolitan Police for carrying out their
duties with great professionalism and to welcome the cooperation of
the Ecuadorian government in bringing this matter to a resolution.
This goes to show that, in the United Kingdom, no one is above the
law.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-
Department of Justice
U.S. Attorney’s Office
Eastern District of Virginia
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Thursday, April 11, 2019
WikiLeaks Founder Charged in Computer Hacking Conspiracy
ALEXANDRIA, Va. – Julian P. Assange, 47, the founder of WikiLeaks, was
arrested today in the United Kingdom pursuant to the U.S./UK
Extradition Treaty, in connection with a federal charge of conspiracy
to commit computer intrusion for agreeing to break a password to a
classified U.S. government computer.
According to court documents unsealed today, the charge relates to
Assange’s alleged role in one of the largest compromises of classified
information in the history of the United States.
The indictment alleges that in March 2010, Assange engaged in a
conspiracy with Chelsea Manning, a former intelligence analyst in the
U.S. Army, to assist Manning in cracking a password stored on U.S.
Department of Defense computers connected to the Secret Internet
Protocol Network (SIPRNet), a U.S. government network used for
classified documents and communications. Manning, who had access to
the computers in connection with her duties as an intelligence
analyst, was using the computers to download classified records to
transmit to WikiLeaks. Cracking the password would have allowed
Manning to log on to the computers under a username that did not
belong to her. Such a deceptive measure would have made it more
difficult for investigators to determine the source of the illegal
disclosures.
During the conspiracy, Manning and Assange engaged in real-time
discussions regarding Manning’s transmission of classified records to
Assange. The discussions also reflect Assange actively encouraging
Manning to provide more information. During an exchange, Manning told
Assange that “after this upload, that’s all I really have got left.”
To which Assange replied, “curious eyes never run dry in my
experience.”
Assange is charged with conspiracy to commit computer intrusion and is
presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable
doubt. If convicted, he faces a maximum penalty of five years in
prison. Actual sentences for federal crimes are typically less than
the maximum penalties. A federal district court judge will determine
any sentence after taking into account the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines
and other statutory factors.
G. Zachary Terwilliger, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of
Virginia, John C. Demers, Assistant Attorney General for National
Security, and Nancy McNamara, Assistant Director in Charge of the
FBI’s Washington Field Office, made the announcement after the charges
were unsealed. First Assistant U.S. Attorney Tracy Doherty-McCormick,
Assistant U.S. Attorneys Kellen S. Dwyer, Thomas W. Traxler and Gordon
D. Kromberg, and Trial Attorneys Matthew R. Walczewski and Nicholas O.
Hunter of the Justice Department’s National Security Division are
prosecuting the case.
The extradition will be handled by the Department of Justice’s Office
of International Affairs.
A copy of this press release is located on the website of the U.S.
Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia. Related court
documents and information are located on the website of the District
Court for the Eastern District of Virginia or on PACER by searching
for Case No. 1:18-cr-111.
An indictment contains allegations that a defendant has committed a
crime. Every defendant is presumed to be innocent until and unless
proven guilty in court.
Attachment(s):
Download assange_indictment.pdf
Topic(s):
Cyber Crime
National Security
Component(s):
USAO - Virginia, Eastern
Contact:
Joshua Stueve
Director of Communications
joshua.stueve@usdoj.gov
https://www.justice.gov/usao-
Meet the U.S. Attorney
G. Zachary Terwilliger
Department of Justice
G. Zachary Terwilliger is the 62nd United States Attorney for the
Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA).
As the chief federal law enforcement officer in EDVA, Terwilliger
supervises the prosecution of all federal crimes and the litigation of
all civil matters in which the United States has an interest. As U.S.
Attorney, Terwilliger leads a staff of over 250 prosecutors, civil
litigators, and support personnel located in Alexandria, Newport News,
Norfolk, and Richmond.
Prior to his appointment as U.S. Attorney on May 25, 2018, Terwilliger
served as an Associate Deputy Attorney General, and Chief of Staff in
the Office of the Deputy Attorney General at the Department of
Justice. In that role, Terwilliger was a principal advisor to senior
Department of Justice leadership in areas such as corporate
compliance, federal, state and local law enforcement cooperation,
violent crime reduction, and other critical matters.
Credentialed media members may contact Joshua Stueve, Director of
Communications for the Eastern District of Virginia, at:
joshua.stueve@usdoj.gov or call 703-842-4050
By Telephone
Alexandria: (703) 299-3700
Newport News: (757) 591-4000
Norfolk: (757) 441-6331
Richmond: (804) 819-5400
https://davidraymondamos3.
Thursday, 11 April 2019
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange arrested, U.K. police say
Well I contacted and called Manning's lawyer first and it appeared
that she didn't care about what I was trying to tell her. So I quickly
gave up
https://moatlaw.com/contact-
Contact Me
If you are interested in a consultation, please leave your name,
email, and a good number at which to reach you, along with a brief
indication of what you want to meet about. Please do not leave any
other information in this form, as it will not be considered
privileged!
Message Sent (go back)
Name: David Raymond Amos
Email: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Phone Number: https://davidraymondamos3.
Subject of Requested Meeting: Perhaps we should discuss Manning's concerns ASAP?
https://davidraymondamos3.
Thursday, 11 April 2019
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange arrested, U.K. police say
https://twitter.com/
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Kathryn98967631 and 47 others
Methinks Manning's and Assange's lawyers should read paragraphs 82 and
83 of my lawsuit (Federal Court File No.T-1557-15) ASAP N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.
#nbpoli #cdnpoli
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
Moira Meltzer-Cohen
277 Broadway Suite 1501,
NY, NY 10007
t: 347.248.6771
https://twitter.com/
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Kathryn98967631 and 47 others
Methinks Manning's and Assange's lawyers should read paragraphs 82 and
83 of my lawsuit (Federal Court File No.T-1557-15) ASAP N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.
#nbpoli #cdnpoli
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange arrested, U.K. police say
469 Comments
David R. Amos
Methinks Mr Assange's lawyers should read paragraph 83 of my lawsuit
(Federal Court File No.T-1557-15) ASAP N'esy Pas?
Doug McComber
Reply to @David R. Amos: Methinks with your bright avatar and litany
of "Methinks" posts on every article (and your lawsuit) that you are
an attention seeker.
Andre Garafolo
Reply David R. Amosto @Doug McComber: Annoying, isn't it.
David R. Amos
Reply to @Doug McComber: Methinks you should have read paragraph 82 of
my lawsuit before you offered your two bit worth N'esy Pas?
David R. Amos
Reply to @Andre Garafolo: Cry me a river
https://davidraymondamos3.
Friday, 18 September 2015
David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15
Court File No. T-1557-15
FEDERAL COURT
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Plaintiff
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
82. The Plaintiff states that any politician or police officer should
have seen enough of Barry Winter’s WordPress blog by June 22, 2015
particularly after the very unnecessary demise of two men in Alberta
because of the incompetence of the EPS. Barry Winters was blogging
about the EPS using battering ram in order to execute a warrant for a
250 dollar bylaw offence at the same time Professor Kris Wells
revealed in a televised interview that the EPS member who was killed
was the one investigating the cyber harassment of him. It was obvious
why the police and politicians ignored all the death threats, sexual
harassment, cyberbullying and hate speech of a proud Zionist who
claimed to be a former CF officer who now working for the Department
of National Defence (DND). It is well known that no politician in
Canada is allowed to sit in Parliament as a member of the major
parties unless they support Israel. Since 2002 the Plaintiff made it
well known that he does not support Israeli actions and was against
the American plan to make war on Iraq. On Aril 1, 2003 within two
weeks of the beginning of the War on Iraq, the US Secret Service
threatened to practice extraordinary rendition because false
allegations of a Presidential threat were made against him by an
American court. However, the Americans and the Crown cannot deny that
what he said in two courts on April 1, 2003 because he published the
recordings of what was truly said as soon as he got the court tapes.
The RCMP knows those words can still be heard on the Internet today.
In 2009, the Plaintiff began to complain of Barry Winters about
something far more important to Canada as nation because of Winters’
bragging of being one of 24 CF officers who assisted the Americans in
the planning the War on Iraq in 2002. In the Plaintiff’s humble
opinion the mandate of the DND is Defence not Attack. He is not so
naive to think that such plans of war do not occur but if Barry
Winters was in fact one of the CF officers who did so then he broke
his oath to the Crown the instant he bragged of it in his blog. If
Winters was never an officer in the CF then he broke the law by
impersonating an officer. The Plaintiff downloaded the emails of the
Privy Council about Wikileaks. The bragging of Barry Winters should
have been investigated in 2009 before CBC reported that documents
released by WikiLeaks supported his information about Canadian
involvement in the War on Iraq.
83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
five years after he began his bragging:
January 13, 2015
This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
December 8, 2014
Why Canada Stood Tall!
Friday, October 3, 2014
Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
Stupid Justin Trudeau
Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
campaign of 2006.
What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An
ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear
and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,”
or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of
terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states
“moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of
Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an
ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the
Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty
was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the
amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time
denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time
self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of
“world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the
G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious
behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister
Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully
cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits
are not.
Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal
mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the
world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy”
David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security
and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can
and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing
“humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war
criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending
tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
“the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing,
marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian
military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern
equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are
antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five
years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that
won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin
Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not
served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social
democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and
other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet
these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to
other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security,
and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before
shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now
From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and
the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still
alive
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply
to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
>>>>
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the
War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil,
Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.
william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca,
milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca,
sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari
<smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
susan@blueskystrategygroup.com
eugene@blueskystrategygroup.
Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice" <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin"
<terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower
<whistleblower@ctv.ca>
I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David
Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's
Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on
CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To
be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested
that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise
if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else
about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact that your
old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English
never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is
interesting though
http://www.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/
Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad
Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a
shy political animal
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
Enjoy Mr Weston
http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/
"But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
including a Canadian general.
That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was
also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
http://baconfat53.blogspot.
"I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
"veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
into the US policy.
At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was
never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
were deployed WMD.
Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
(and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions
are to met before US troop can redeploy? Prime Minister Jean Chretien
and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of
Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them
correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the
George W Bush administration was onerous
American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
....not necessarily in that order. "
You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
http://www.socom.mil/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 15:46:30 -0400
Subject: YO Andy Baby Scheer tell your lawyer to say Hey to Barry
Bachrach the FBI too will ya?
To: pdownard@fasken.com, "andrew.scheer" <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>,
duncank@progressalberta.ca, julian.porter@julianporterqc.
"justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
"Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "chris.dentremont"
<chris.dentremont@me.com>, barrington@chrisdentremont.com
<zach@zachchurchill.com>, ca@zachchurchill.com,
submit@thepostmillennial.com, melissa@peipcteam.ca,
ernie@peipcteam.ca, barb@peipcteam.ca, tyler@peipcteam.ca,
paul@peipcteam.ca, hilton@peipcteam.ca, jason@peipcteam.ca, bbachrach
<bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>
Cc: "elise.von.scheel@cbc.ca\"
<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, "philip.bryden"
<philip.bryden@gov.ab.ca>, "rod.knecht" <rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>
>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>
>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>> cards?
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>> 6
>>>
>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>> United States Senate
>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>
>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>> tapes.
>>>
>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>
>>> Very truly yours,
>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>
>>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "submit@thepostmillennial.com" <submit@thepostmillennial.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2019 19:26:08 GMT
Subject: Thank you for submitting with The Post Millennial
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Hi David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
Thank you for submitting your article to us. If you receive this
automated message it means we have received your documents.
If you have any questions feel free to reach out to us here:
Ali Taghva • 514-550-7066
Madison Hofmeester • 978-882-1667
Best, The Post Millennial team
Search for Boston mobster victims heads to Nova Scotia
By The Associated Press
Posted Jan 15, 2001 at 12:01 AM
YARMOUTH, Nova Scotia -- Massachusetts state police will travel to
southwestern Nova Scotia Wednesday to examine a site where Boston
mobsters may have buried their victims. Elizabeth Conrad Parent, 43,
whose father Kenneth “Bobby” Conrad has been missing since 1979,
believes he was killed by an associate of South Boston gangster James
“Whitey” Bulger and buried in Canada -- alongside other victims of
Bulger’s group.
Last month, Parent recounted to the Boston Herald that former FBI
agent John J. Connolly Jr. told her almost 20 years ago that her
father was stabbed by Bulger associate Louis R. Litif, and buried in
Nova Scotia. Parent believes her father disappeared after witnessing a
Mafia killing in the basement of a Boston bar.
The Halifax Daily News reported yesterday that four officers will fly
to Yarmouth to discuss with local Royal Canadian Mounted Police a
small parcel of land in rural Deerfield, Nova Scotia. According to
land registry reports, Litif -- who was murdered in Boston in April
1980 -- purchased a house and land in Deerfield in 1971. His widow is
still an absentee landlord of the property.
Sgt. Brian Oldford, a spokesman for the RCMP, said any potential
murder investigation would be handled locally. “We would rely heavily
on (Massachusetts police) for intelligence, but the actual homicide,
as I understand it from reading the newspaper, took place on Canadian
soil and the body’s on Canadian soil,” he said.
Oldford expects the Massachusetts investigators will be in Nova Scotia
for only one day. “It’ll just be a matter of them telling us what they
know and then getting them back on the plane,” he said.
Parent said Connolly told her in a 1983 telephone conversation “a lot
of bodies” were buried at the site.
Bulger, who is on the FBI’s Ten Most Wanted list, was recently
indicted on new charges alleging he was involved in 18 murders.
https://www.thevanguard.ca/
Could mobster arrest shed light on rumour?
The Vanguard
Published: Jun 23, 2011 at midnight
Updated: Sep 30, 2017 at 7:20 a.m.
The RCMP conduct of a dig of a rumoured mob graveyard in Yarmouth
County in October 2001. No human remains were found. TINA COMEAU PHOTO
By Tina Comeau
THE VANGUARD
NovaNewsNow.com
The arrest of notorious mobster James “Whitey” Bulger in Santa Monica,
California, on Wednesday, June 22, has piqued the interest of the RCMP
in Yarmouth who wonder if Bulger’s arrest may eventually shed new
light on a rumoured mob graveyard here.
After being on the FBI’s 10 Most Wanted List and on the lam for around
16 years, the 81-year-old mob king-pin was arrested without incident
after the FBI launched some daytime television ads two days before
seeking the whereabouts of Bulger's girlfriend, Catherine Greig, with
a $100,000 reward offered. There was a $2 million reward for Bulger's
capture.
Corporal Dana Parsons, of the RCMP’s Southwest Major Crime Unit based
in Yarmouth, had not yet heard about Bulger’s arrest when contacted
Thursday morning by the Vanguard. He admitted the arrest is intriguing
in terms of the information it could yield when Bulger is questioned
by American authorities.
Bulger was wanted on charges of racketeering, 19 counts of murder,
conspiracy to commit murder, money laundering, extortion and drug
distribution.
But in these parts his name is of interest given rumours of a mob
graveyard in Yarmouth County.
In 2001, an extensive dig was held at a property located at the corner
of the Saunders Road and Mood Road. For 20 days the RCMP had the
permission to dig a 1.2-acre site where a bartender from Boston was
rumoured to be buried.
The property was turned upside-down and inside-out, and there was even
digging done in the basement of a residence on the scene, but no human
remains were found.
Cpl. Parsons notes that this was not a missing persons file in Nova
Scotia, rather it was a missing persons file originating in the United
States. Therefore it is still up to American authorities to lead any
investigation or inquiries. But this isn’t to say, he says, that if
new substantiated information comes forward that the police here
wouldn’t get involved again.
“It should be their follow-up as far as the interview of Bulger and if
he discloses that a murder occurred up here, than we would become
involved again,” Parsons says.
The man whose remains the RCMP were searching for when they carried
out the dig in October 2001 was South Boston bartender Kenneth Bobby
Conrad, who disappeared in 1979 after allegedly witnessing a mob hit.
The man’s daughter claimed that two years after her father vanished,
an FBI agent by the name of John Connelly had told her that her father
had been lured to Yarmouth County by a mob associate and murdered.
At the time of Conrad’s disappearance, the property was owned by Louis
R. Litif, who was an associate of Bulger. Conrad’s daughter said she
had been told that Litif had killed her father and buried his body at
the property. She said she was told other bodies were buried there as
well.
Getting information from Litif years later was a dead end. In 1980 he
was killed in a gangland slaying in Boston. In 2001 his widow had
given police the permission to dig up the property. She had taken over
part ownership of the property a month before Litif was killed.
(An interesting footnote in this story is Whitey Bulger used to be an
informant for the FBI. But when it was decided in 1994 he had to be
arrested for his crimes, it was FBI agent John Connelly who had tipped
Bulger off, allowing him to escape and remain on the lam for 16 years.
Connelly is serving time for obstruction of justice.)
When the news surfaced in 2000 about a possible mob graveyard in
Yarmouth County – which led to the dig a year later – local residents
of the area said they had heard rumours about alleged mob connections
to the property in the past. So while the news was shocking, it wasn’t
necessarily surprising.
The RCMP dig was not a simple matter of the police going onto the
property with shovels. An infrared device was used to detect
variations or disturbances in the ground. A gas-powered machine with a
spike drum was used to unlock scents beneath the ground for police
dogs. An excavator was brought onto the scene. Even the Yarmouth
County Ground Search and Rescue Team conducted a hands-and-knees
search through wooded areas of the property that had not been dug up
by the excavator.
But in the end, the RCMP could only dig and search the area for which
they had permission. After a week they concluded the dig.
“It’s never been laid to rest because there has never been a resolve
to the disappearance of that body,” says Cpl. Parsons.
On the one hand, there was no body found on the property, so was it
just a rumour and therefore a waste of money and effort? Or on the
other hand, did the dig not go far enough?
Cpl. Parsons says while the RCMP here won’t be looking to lead any new
investigation into the matter, because the file originates in the
United States, he said he may contact U.S. authorities just to touch
base with them and remind them of the assistance the police here
provided in the past.
“We don’t have an open file on a missing persons, our file was an
assistance file to them to see if there was a body up here on that
property in Deerfield,” he says. “Ultimately it’s their lead and what
we would do is follow-up on anything they gave us.”
Yet while Cpl. Parsons stresses the onus would be on the American
authorities, he says ultimately in investigations of missing persons
everyone is seeking the same goal – to bring these investigations to a
successful conclusion and hopefully bring about closure for a family.
And perhaps, in this case, to also put rumours to the test, or put them to rest.
New details emerge about radio host's 1st Puerto Rico court appearance
Trevor Doyle was detained pending trial because he was deemed a 'risk
of flight and danger to the community'
Hadeel Ibrahim · CBC News · Posted: Apr 10, 2019 3:50 PM AT
Prominent radio host Trevor Doyle is accused of sexual enticement of a
minor after being arrested in Puerto Rico. (Trevor Doyle/Twitter)
Court documents obtained by CBC News show new details of Trevor
Doyle's detention hearing on Monday in Puerto Rico.
The Fredericton radio host charged with sexual enticement of a minor
was detained pending a trial "on the basis of risk of flight and
danger to the community," said the minutes filed by the court
reporter.
According to the minutes, Doyle's defence attorney, Jesus Hernandez,
did not request conditions of release or a bail hearing but reserved
his right to reopen the detention hearing at a later date.
Radio host accused of child sex crime in Puerto Rico could face
long path to justice
Radio host accused of arranging for sex with minor detained in Puerto Rico
Doyle is a longtime host for Capital FM in Fredericton.
On Monday, he also filed a waiver of a preliminary hearing, which
means his case will go directly to trial. This does not mean an
immediate trial, however, and Doyle still has not entered a plea.
"The court approved the waiver and found probable cause as to the
charge contained in the criminal complaint," the minutes said.
A United States District Court document showing Trevor Doyle waived
his right to a preliminary hearing. (United States District Court)
The detention hearing lasted 15 minutes Monday.
Doyle was arrested on April 3 after an FBI sting operation involving
an agent posing as a 13-year-old girl. Doyle allegedly messaged the
agent on two separate apps for several days, ultimately arranging a
meeting at Pine Grove Beach in Isla Verde for oral sex.
The prosecution alleges Doyle believed he was communicating with a
13-year-old girl because the agent brought up her age multiple times.
Evidence submitted by the FBI allege he brought up her age once.
Medical conditions
As soon as he was arrested, the detention centre was advised that
Doyle suffers from anxiety, depression and high blood pressure.
Court documents posted Tuesday but signed on April 3 advised the
Metropolitan Detention Centre in Guaynabo, about 16 kilometres south
of San Juan, that Doyle "is being or has been treated and/or suffers
from" the ailments.
Trevor Doyle is being held at the Metropolitan Detention Centre in
Guaynabo, about 16 kilometres south of San Juan. (BOP.gov/submitted)
A spokesperson for Bell Media, which owns Capital FM, did not comment
on Doyle's legal situation but confirmed he's been suspended from his
job as host of the morning show.
The Canadian consulate in Puerto Rico has been notified of Doyle's
arrest and detention.
Trevor Doyle was a morning show radio host on 106.9 Capital FM for
years. (Trevor Doyle/Twitter)
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
No comments:
Post a Comment