Mar 1, 2026 Anything but Politics with David Myles - S01 E02 - Hon. Steven MacKinnon [Filmed 01/12/2026]
This is Anything But Politics with David Myles, the podcast where we talk about anything and everything BUT politics. My second guest is the Honourable Steven MacKinnon! I knew Steven was a music fan and a Maritimer, so I was especially excited to chat with him during a recent visit to Fredericton.
The idea for this podcast comes from my desire to have conversations with other Parliamentarians about their lives outside of politics. I’m loving my new job (as MP for Fredericton-Oromocto) and one of the best parts is meeting, and getting to know, the other members of Parliament (from all parties)! It’s a fascinating group of people who reflect our country in such an amazing way. I wanted to talk about the things we share, the fears we have, the struggles we go through and what fills our cup at the end of the day.
In this episode, Steven talks about early lessons learned on the family farm, how he discovered the French language and his ongoing obsession with Bruce Springsteen.
Hard to predict when I’ll get to record the next podcast, but my goal is to keep having these conversations whenever one of my fellow Parliamentarians comes through town. Who would you like to hear from next? I’d love to hear your suggestions in the comments!
Thanks so much for listening and thanks again to Steven for joining me. I hope you enjoy our chat!
---------- Original message ----------
From: Minister of Finance / Ministre des Finances<minister-ministre@fin.gc.ca> Date: Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 3:04 PM Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks NDP interim Leader Don Davies should read his emails ASAP N'esy Pas? To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
The Department of Finance Canada acknowledges receipt of your electronic correspondence.
Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your comments.
Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
---------- Original message ---------- From: Davies, Don - M.P.<don.davies@parl.gc.ca> Date: Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 3:09 PM Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks NDP interim Leader Don Davies should read his emails ASAP N'esy Pas? To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
*Please do not reply to this email*
Greetings!
I acknowledge receipt of your email. Thank you for taking the time to contact me and express your views.
Our office is open Mondays, Tuesday, Thursdays, and Fridays from 10am-4pm. We are closed Wednesdays for case processing.
While I read all correspondence, the volume of email we receive means
that I am not able to respond immediately to every message. Every effort
will be made to reply to you as soon as possible. Please note that in
most cases, anonymous, cc’d or forwarded items
will be read but will not receive a response.
If the information you have sent is about a concern that you have as a
constituent, please make sure that you have given your full name,
address and telephone number so my office is able to assist you
efficiently. If you live outside Vancouver Kingsway please
contact your own Member of Parliament for assistance.
Please be assured that all email sent to this office is treated as confidential.
Should you need further assistance, please contact my office at 604-775-6263.
Sincerely,
Don Davies, MP
Vancouver Kingsway
---------- Original message ----------
From: Blanchet, Yves-François - Député<Yves-Francois.Blanchet@parl.gc.ca> Date: Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 3:09 PM Subject: Réponse automatique : Methinks NDP interim Leader Don Davies should read his emails ASAP N'esy Pas? To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
(Ceci est une réponse automatique)
(English follows)
Bonjour,
Nous
avons bien reçu votre courriel et nous vous remercions d'avoir écrit à
M. Yves-François Blanchet, député de Beloeil-Chambly et chef du Bloc
Québécois.
Comme
nous avons un volume important de courriels, il nous est impossible de
répondre à tous individuellement. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel
recevra toute l'attention nécessaire.
Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.
L'équipe du député Yves-François Blanchet
Chef du Bloc Québécois
Thank you for your email. We will read it as soon as we can.
We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.
---------- Original message ---------- From: Poilievre, Pierre - M.P.<pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca> Date: Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 3:10 PM Subject: Acknowledgement – Email Received / Accusé de réception – Courriel reçu To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
On behalf of the Hon. Pierre Poilievre, we would
like to thank you for contacting the Office of the Leader of the
Official Opposition.
Mr. Poilievre greatly values feedback and input from Canadians. We wish
to inform you that the Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition
reads and reviews every e-mail we receive. Please note that this
account receives a high volume of e-mails, and
we endeavour to reply as quickly as possible.
If you are a constituent of Mr. Poilievre in the
riding of Battle River - Crowfoot and you have an urgent matter to
discuss, please contact his constituency office at:
Phone: 1-780-608-4600
Fax: 1-780-608-4603
Hon. Pierre Poilievre, M.P.
Battle River – Crowfoot
Au nom de l’honorable Pierre
Poilievre, nous tenons à vous remercier d’avoir communiqué avec le
Bureau du chef de l’Opposition officielle.
M. Poilievre accorde une grande importance aux commentaires et aux
suggestions des Canadiens. Nous tenons à vous informer que le Bureau du
chef de l’Opposition officielle lit et examine tous les courriels qu’il
reçoit. Veuillez noter que ce compte reçoit un
volume important de courriels et que nous nous efforçons d’y répondre
le plus rapidement possible.
Si vous êtes un électeur de
M. Poilievre dans la circonscription de Battle River - Crowfoot et que
vous avez une question urgente à discuter, veuillez contacter son bureau
de circonscription :
Téléphone : 1-780-608-4600
Télécopieur : 1-780-608-4603
L’honorable Pierre Poilievre, député
Battle River – Crowfoot
4945, 50 Street
Camrose (Alberta) T4V 1P9
Encore une fois, merci de votre message.
Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées,
Bureau du chef de l’Opposition officielle
---------- Original message ----------
From: Lantsman, Melissa - M.P.<melissa.lantsman@parl.gc.ca> Date: Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 3:10 PM Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks NDP interim Leader Don Davies should read his emails ASAP N'esy Pas? To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting the office of MP Melissa Lantsman.
Priority is given to constituents of Thornhill.If your email did not include your full residential address (including postal code), please resend it with this information.
For
those outside of Thornhill, please note that your local Member of
Parliament can best address your concerns. You can find your
local MP by clicking the following link and searching by postal code.https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en
Lastly,
if you are contacting MP Lantsman regarding an immigration case from
outside Canada, we regret that we are unable to assist.
To avoid delays, please direct your inquiry to Immigration, Refugees,
and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) using the following link:https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/application.html.
Thank you once again for contacting our constituency office.
Office of Melissa Lantsman
Deputy Leader of His Majesty’s Loyal Opposition
Member of Parliament for Thornhill
---------- Original message ---------- From: Brock, Larry - M.P.<larry.brock@parl.gc.ca> Date: Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 3:09 PM Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks NDP interim Leader Don Davies should read his emails ASAP N'esy Pas? To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting the office of Larry Brock, Member of Parliament (MP) for Brantford-Brant South-Six Nations.
MP Brock welcomes hearing from constituents on issues that are important
to them. A reply to your email will be provided as soon as possible.
Due to the high volume of email correspondence we receive, priority will
be given to residents of Brantford-Brant South-Six Nations, and to
emails of a non-form letter or “email forward” variation. Likewise, if
you reside outside of Mr. Brock’s riding, please
contact your local Member of Parliament. To find your MP, please visit Find Members of Parliament - Members of Parliament - House of Commons of Canada (ourcommons.ca)
In order for us to serve you better, please provide your complete
residential mailing address, including postal code and a phone number.
If you did not provide this in your original email, please re-forward
your original email providing this information.
If you require assistance with an urgent matter, please call our
constituency office at 519-754-4300, Monday to Friday, 8:30am to 4pm.
Again, thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts and concerns.
Kind Regards,
Office of Larry Brock, MP for Brantford-Brant South-Six Nations
---------- Original message ---------- From: Moore, Rob - M.P.<Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca> Date: Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 3:09 PM Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks NDP interim Leader Don Davies should read his emails ASAP N'esy Pas? To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
*This is an automated response*
Thank you for contacting the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. office. We
appreciate the time you took to get in touch with our office.
If you did not already, please ensure to include your full contact
details on your email and the appropriate staff will be able to action
your request. We strive to ensure all constituent correspondence is
responded to in a timely manner.
If your question or concern is time sensitive, please call our office: 506-832-4200.
Again, we thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts and concerns.
From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada<mcu@justice.gc.ca> Date: Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 3:04 PM Subject: Automatic Reply To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for writing to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
Due
to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please note
that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that
your
message will be carefully reviewed.
We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.
-------------------
Merci d'avoir écrit au ministre de la Justice et procureur général du Canada.
En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
avec soin.
Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.
---------- Original message ---------- From: Anand, Anita - M.P.<Anita.Anand@parl.gc.ca> Date: Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 3:09 PM Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks NDP interim Leader Don Davies should read his emails ASAP N'esy Pas? To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for reaching out to the office of Anita Anand, Member of
Parliament for Oakville East. Your message is important, and we want to
ensure it goes to the right place.
Our constituency office is dedicated to supporting residents of the
Oakville East riding with matters related to federal services and local
concerns. Please ensure you provide your address including postal code
and a concise explanation of your matter so we
can respond to you in a timely manner.
To receive direct updates from MP Anand, sign up for her newsletter and follow her on social media:
https://www.mpanitaanand.ca/
---------- Original message ---------- From: <Anita.Anand@international.gc.ca> Date: Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 3:04 PM Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks NDP interim Leader Don Davies should read his emails ASAP N'esy Pas? To: <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
(La version française suit.)
Thank
you for your correspondence addressed to the Honourable Anita Anand,
Minister of Foreign Affairs. Correspondence volumes are
high. Although the Minister cannot provide a personalized response to
every message, each one is reviewed and, where appropriate, shared with
relevant parts of Global Affairs Canada (GAC).
· If you are a Canadian citizen abroad in need of emergency consular assistance:
Many other questions can be answered by referring to GAC’s
website,
which also includes a list of contacts
by subject matter. You may also wish to consult the list below for other specific information.
Nous
vous remercions pour votre correspondance adressée à l’honorable Anita
Anand, ministre des Affaires étrangères. Nous recevons
un volume élevé de correspondance. Bien que la ministre ne puisse pas
fournir une réponse personnalisée à tous les messages, chacun d’entre
eux est examiné et communiqué, le cas échéant, aux services compétents
d’Affaires mondiales Canada (AMC).
· Si vous êtes un citoyen canadien à l’étranger et que vous avez besoin d’une aide consulaire d’urgence :
· Si votre correspondance concerne la situation au Liban :
· veuillez consulter la
réponse
du Canada au conflit au Liban, qui comprend les coordonnées d’urgence pour les Canadiens et les résidents permanents. Vous pouvez également remplir un
formulaire
de demande d’assistance si vous êtes un citoyen canadien ou un résident permanent et que vous vous trouvez toujours au Liban.
· Si votre correspondance concerne la situation en Ukraine :
La réponse à de nombreuses autres questions se trouve sur le
site Web
d’AMC, qui comprend aussi une liste de points
de contact par sujet. Pour en savoir plus sur d’autres sujets précis, vous pouvez également consulter la liste ci-dessous :
Nous vous remercions à nouveau d’avoir écrit à la ministre.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Gould, Karina - M.P.<Karina.Gould@parl.gc.ca> Date: Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 3:09 PM Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks NDP interim Leader Don Davies should read his emails ASAP N'esy Pas? To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank
you for contacting the office of the Hon. Karina Gould, Member of
Parliament for Burlington. This message is to confirm that your email
has been received.
Please note that we are currently
experiencing a high volume of inquiries. Our priority is to respond to
constituents who reside within the riding of Burlington. If you have not
already done so, please include your full
address and postal code so we can confirm that you live in the riding
and better assist you.
If you are unsure who your Member of Parliament is, you can find that information by entering your postal code at: www.ourcommons.ca/members/en
Our office is open Monday to Friday
from 9:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. We appreciate your patience and will
respond as soon as possible.
In case of an emergency or urgent situation, you can also contact the following services:
Emergencies - 911
Halton Region - 311
Service Canada — 1 800 622 6232
CPP / OAS —1 800 277-9914
Employment Insurance —1 800 206 7218
CRA — 1-800 959 8281
Immigration— 1 888 242 2100
Passport Canada —1 800 567 6868
Halton Regional Police - 905-825-4777
---------- Original message ---------- From: Holt, Susan Premier (PO/CPM)<Susan.Holt@gnb.ca> Date: Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 3:04 PM Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks NDP interim Leader Don Davies should read his emails ASAP N'esy Pas? To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Hi there,
Thank
you so much for reaching out to Premier Susan Holt. This account
receives a high volume of emails but rest assured that your message is
important to us and is being triaged accordingly.
If
you do not consent to your email being forwarded to another government
department or agency, please reply to this email and let us know.
Please
be advised that responses from Premier Holt can take an average of 5
weeks to be processed; priority items may be replied to sooner. Thank
you for your patience as our team prepares
a response.
–
Bonjour,
Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec la première ministre SusanHolt.
Nous recevons
un important volume de courriels, mais soyez assurés que votre message
est important pour nous et qu’il sera traité comme il se doit.
Si
vous ne consentez pas à ce que votre courriel soit transmis à un autre
ministère ou organisme provincial, veuillez-nous en informer en
répondant à ce courriel
Veuillez
noter que les réponses de la première ministre peuvent prendre en
moyenne 5 semaines à être traitées ; les demandes prioritaires peuvent
être traitées plus rapidement. Nous
vous remercions de votre patience et vous répondrons dans les meilleurs
délais.
Mar 11, 2026 Liberal
Prime Minister Mark Carney and Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre
squared off during question period in the House of Commons this
afternoon.
Methinks the Bankster/PM who rarely
bothers to come to question period did so in order to have some fun
teasing the opposition who supported the Throne Speech and Budget in a
secretive fashion because they knew they would lose the next election
bigtime if they were cause it.
However the
Fat Lady has not sung yet about the Senate having third reading of the
Budget 2025 Implementation Act. So the opposition may get the last laugh
which is always the best N'esy Pas?
As I watched Carney the latest Ringmaster of
the Circus join his federal cohorts having fun today I thought of what
CBC News Posted: March 04, 2026
"Central
bankers have more fun: Carney"
In a more relaxed tone, Carney also used the f-word while telling a
story from his time as a central banker.
Michael Fullilove, the executive director of the Lowy Institute who
hosted the chat, asked whether central bankers or prime ministers have
more fun. Carney chose central bankers, recalling “crazy” dinners and
“good wine."
He told a story from when he was two weeks into his job as governor of
the Bank of Canada in early 2008, during the collapse of U.S. investment
bank Bear Sterns. Carney said that during a dinner with the G-10
central banks, the group had about an hour and a half to make a
decision.
WATCH | Carney drops f-word in lighthearted anecdote:
Carney
drops f-word in anecdote, says bankers have more fun than politicians
March 4| Duration 1:56
In a more relaxed moment during an armchair discussion at the Lowy
Institute in Sydney, Australia, Prime Minister Mark Carney drops the
f-word while telling a story from his time as Governor of the Bank of
Canada. Carney was asked who has more fun between central bankers and
prime ministers.
He recalled being welcomed by the chair, a seven-course meal and being
offered what the chair called “the best wine in Europe." However, Carney
said the chair took a long time to list and detail every choice of
wine.
“And he's like, ‘Well have this one, but you know, the pinot grigio,’
and I’m like f--k,” Carney said, laughing.
He said that after the wine discussion, there was one hour left to make
the financial decisions. “An hour later, all I remember is, man the wine
is fantastic,” he said.
Conservative MPs will debate against Carney's Liberal cabinet today during question period, while Mark Carney is in Yellowknife, and Pierre is heading to the United States. Tune in at 2pm EST for live coverage of question period!
---------- Original message ---------- From: Davies, Don - M.P. Date: Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 3:09 PM Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks NDP interim Leader Don Davies should read his emails ASAP N'esy Pas? To: David Amos
Minister
of Transport and leader of the government in the House of Commons
Steven MacKinnon speaks to reporters ahead of a cabinet meeting on
Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Oct. 21. (Spencer Colby/The Canadian Press)
Liberal House leader
Steve MacKinnon signalled Tuesday that he’s concerned the government’s
budget might not get support from the opposition benches, while at the
same time dismissing some demands other parties have laid out.
The
Liberal government will need the co-operation of at least one other
party in order to pass the budget, which is being tabled on Nov. 4.
Because the budget is a confidence vote, Canadians could be facing
another election if it doesn’t pass.
"When I see opposition
parties ruling out the possibility of voting for the budget, that's
starting to worry me," MacKinnon told reporters on Parliament Hill.
Opposition parties have begun laying out some priorities for the upcoming budget.
WATCH | Liberal House leader worried about support for upcoming budget:
Liberal House leader worried about lack of support for budget
3 hours ago |
Duration 1:48
Asked
about the upcoming federal budget, Steven MacKinnon says he's concerned
that two opposition parties 'are not taking this matter very seriously'
and that he doesn't think Canadians want another election.
On Monday, Conservative Leader Pierre
Poilievre penned a letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney saying he wants
to see an “affordable budget” that includes broad tax cuts and keeping
the deficit under $42 billion.
Meanwhile, the Bloc Québécois has
said they have six key priorities for the budget including: an increase
to the federal health transfer to the provinces, new infrastructure
investments, an expansion of the rapid housing initiative, interest-free
loans for first-time homebuyers and boosting Old Age Security (OAS)
payments for those ages 65 to 75.
Despite raising concerns about getting support for the budget, MacKinnon dismissed both the Conservative and Bloc demands.
"We
intend to present a plan to Canadians to deal with this very critical
moment in our history, and what we're seeing is opposition parties — the
Bloc Québécois, who without having even read the budget, eliminating
the possibility that they'll support it — and Conservatives making just
ludicrous demands,” he said Tuesday.
Up to government to get support: NDP
NDP
interim Leader Don Davies fired back at MacKinnon’s comments, saying
it's up to the government to gather support for its budget.
"The
question of whether there is an election is entirely up to Mr. Carney.
As a leader of a government with a minority in Parliament, it's up to
him to craft a budget that can win the support of at least one
opposition party. That's his job," Davies said during a press conference
in Ottawa on Tuesday.
WATCH | NDP will wait until the budget is tabled next month, Davies says:
Davies says no discussions had with Liberals on exchanges for budget support
3 hours ago |
Duration 1:56
NDP
interim leader Don Davies has dismissed reports that his party would
negotiate with the Liberal government for budget support as ‘simply not
true.’ He said the NDP will wait until the budget is tabled next month
before deciding to back it.
"For Mr.
MacKinnon to say he's worried, well that has me worried. Because the
government should be reaching out to all the parties and working
collaboratively to make sure that they can get enough votes to have the
budget passed."
While the NDP caucus was reduced to only seven
seats after April’s election, they still have enough sway to determine
the outcome of a vote. The Liberals could pass the budget if New
Democrats support it or abstain from the vote.
Davies met with
Carney earlier this month to lay out his party’s priorities for the
budget. He told reporters after the meeting that he wants to see
“substantial investment” in jobs, health care and housing — though he
didn’t list specific items.
Carney
has indicated that this year’s deficit will be larger than the last —
though the Liberals have promised to balance the operational spending on
the day-to-day running of government in three years.
The
Parliamentary Budget Officer (PBO) released a report last month
forecasting that the government will post an annual deficit of $68.5
billion this year, up from $51.7 billion last year.
But that
update does not include plans to incrementally ramp up defence spending
to meet the updated NATO benchmark of five per cent of GDP by 2035, nor
does it factor in Ottawa's announced plans to reduce public service
spending over the next three years.
Darren
Major is a senior writer for CBC's parliamentary bureau in Ottawa. He
previously worked as a digital reporter for CBC Ottawa and a producer
for CBC's Power & Politics. He holds a master's degree in journalism
and a bachelor's degree in public affairs and policy management, both
from Carleton University. He also holds master's degree in arts from
Queen's University. He can be reached at darren.major@cbc.ca.
House
Leader Steven MacKinnon says he's 'worried' a lack of support from
opposition parties for the Carney government's first budget could lead
to a snap election. The Power Panel discusses the politics around the
government's concerns.
RE Poilievre blasts ‘despicable’ RCMP leadership, accuses Mounties of covering up for Trudeau
---------- Original message ---------- From: Davies, Don - M.P.<don.davies@parl.gc.ca> Date: Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 5:50 PM Subject: Automatic reply: RE Poilievre blasts ‘despicable’ RCMP leadership, accuses Mounties of covering up for Trudeau To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
*Please do not reply to this email*
Greetings!
I acknowledge receipt of your email. Thank you for taking the time to contact me and express your views.
Our office is open Mondays, Tuesday, Thursdays, and Fridays from 10am-4pm. We are closed Wednesdays for case processing.
While I read all correspondence, the volume of email we receive means
that I am not able to respond immediately to every message. Every effort
will be made to reply to you as soon as possible. Please note that in
most cases, anonymous, cc’d or forwarded items
will be read but will not receive a response.
If the information you have sent is about a concern that you have as a
constituent, please make sure that you have given your full name,
address and telephone number so my office is able to assist you
efficiently. If you live outside Vancouver Kingsway please
contact your own Member of Parliament for assistance.
Thank you for writing to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
Due
to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please note
that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that
your
message will be carefully reviewed.
We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.
-------------------
Merci d'avoir écrit au ministre de la Justice et procureur général du Canada.
En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
avec soin.
Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Blanchet, Yves-François - Député<Yves-Francois.Blanchet@parl.gc.ca> Date: Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 5:36 PM Subject: Réponse automatique : RE Poilievre blasts ‘despicable’ RCMP leadership, accuses Mounties of covering up for Trudeau To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
(Ceci est une réponse automatique)
(English follows)
Bonjour,
Nous
avons bien reçu votre courriel et nous vous remercions d'avoir écrit à
M. Yves-François Blanchet, député de Beloeil-Chambly et chef du Bloc
Québécois.
Comme
nous avons un volume important de courriels, il nous est impossible de
répondre à tous individuellement. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel
recevra toute l'attention nécessaire.
Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.
L'équipe du député Yves-François Blanchet
Chef du Bloc Québécois
Thank you for your email. We will read it as soon as we can.
We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.
---------- Original message ---------- From: Poilievre, Pierre - M.P.<pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca> Date: Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 5:35 PM Subject: Acknowledgement – Email Received / Accusé de réception – Courriel reçu To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
On behalf of the Hon. Pierre Poilievre, we would
like to thank you for contacting the Office of the Leader of the
Official Opposition.
Mr. Poilievre greatly values feedback and input from Canadians. We wish
to inform you that the Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition
reads and reviews every e-mail we receive. Please note that this
account receives a high volume of e-mails, and
we endeavour to reply as quickly as possible.
If you are a constituent of Mr. Poilievre in the
riding of Battle River - Crowfoot and you have an urgent matter to
discuss, please contact his constituency office at:
Phone: 1-780-608-4600
Fax: 1-780-608-4603
Hon. Pierre Poilievre, M.P.
Battle River – Crowfoot
Au nom de l’honorable Pierre
Poilievre, nous tenons à vous remercier d’avoir communiqué avec le
Bureau du chef de l’Opposition officielle.
M. Poilievre accorde une grande importance aux commentaires et aux
suggestions des Canadiens. Nous tenons à vous informer que le Bureau du
chef de l’Opposition officielle lit et examine tous les courriels qu’il
reçoit. Veuillez noter que ce compte reçoit un
volume important de courriels et que nous nous efforçons d’y répondre
le plus rapidement possible.
Si vous êtes un électeur de
M. Poilievre dans la circonscription de Battle River - Crowfoot et que
vous avez une question urgente à discuter, veuillez contacter son bureau
de circonscription :
Téléphone : 1-780-608-4600
Télécopieur : 1-780-608-4603
L’honorable Pierre Poilievre, député
Battle River – Crowfoot
4945, 50 Street
Camrose (Alberta) T4V 1P9
Encore une fois, merci de votre message.
Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées,
Bureau du chef de l’Opposition officielle
-------- Original message --------
From: Joshua M. Juneau<jjuneau@mdlo.ca> Date: Mon, Mar 9, 2026 at 9:52 PM Subject: RE: Canada is breaking its 'sacred oath' to veterans if it passes the Budget Implementation Act unamended To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
MICHEL DRAPEAU LAW OFFICE / CABINET JURIDIQUE MICHEL DRAPEAU
This
message is intended for the exclusive use of its addressee and may
contain confidential information and be protected under solicitor-client
privilege.
Please advise if you wish us to use a mode of communication other than
regular, unsecured e-mail in our communications with you. Ce
message est à l'usage exclusif de son destinataire et peut contenir des
renseignements confidentiels et être protégé par le secret
professionnel.
Si vous désirez que nous communiquions avec vous par un autre moyen de
transmission que le courrier électronique ordinaire non sécurisé,
veuillez nous en aviser.
Methinks desperate politicians do desperate things N'esy Pas???
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Blogger <no-reply@blogger.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 9, 2026 at 8:49AM
Subject: Your post titled "Canada is breaking its 'sacred oath' to
veterans if it passes the Budget Implementation Act unamended" has been
unpublished
To: <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Hello,
As you may know, our Community Guidelines (https://blogger.com/go/contentpolicy)
describe the boundaries for what we allow-- and don't allow-- on
Blogger. Your post titled "Canada is breaking
its 'sacred oath' to veterans if it passes the Budget Implementation
Act unamended" was flagged to us for review. We have determined that it
violates our guidelines and have unpublished the URL
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2026/02/canada-is-breaking-its-sacred-oath-to.html , making it unavailable to blog readers.
You may have the option to pursue your claims in court. If you have
legal questions or wish to examine legal options that may be available
to you, you may want to consult with your own legal counsel.
For more information, please review the following resources:
---------- Original message ---------
From: Minister of Finance / Ministre des Finances <minister-ministre@fin.gc.ca>
Date: Sun, Mar 8, 2026 at 3:07PM
Subject: Automatic reply: Canada is breaking its 'sacred oath' to veterans if it passes the Budget Implementation Act unamended
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
The Department of Finance Canada acknowledges receipt of your electronic correspondence.
Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your comments.
Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
---------- Original message ---------
From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Sun, Mar 8, 2026 at 3:12PM
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
Thank you for writing to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
Due to the volume of correspondence
addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay in
processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be carefully
reviewed.
We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.
-------------------
Merci d'avoir écrit au ministre de la Justice et procureur général du Canada.
En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
avec soin.
Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.
---------- Original message ---------
From: Blanchet, Yves-François - Député <Yves-Francois.Blanchet@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Sun, Mar 8, 2026 at 3:12PM
Subject: Réponse automatique : Canada is breaking its 'sacred oath' to
veterans if it passes the Budget Implementation Act unamended
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
(Ceci est une réponse automatique)
(English follows)
Bonjour,
Nous avons
bien reçu votre courriel et nous vous remercions d'avoir écrit à M.
Yves-François Blanchet, député de Beloeil-Chambly et chef du Bloc
Québécois.
Comme nous
avons un volume important de courriels, il nous est impossible de
répondre à tous individuellement. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel
recevra toute l'attention nécessaire.
Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.
L'équipe du député Yves-François Blanchet
Chef du Bloc Québécois
Thank you for your email. We will read it as soon as we can.
We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.
---------- Original message ---------
From: Poilievre, Pierre - M.P. <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Sun, Mar 8, 2026 at 3:07PM
Subject: Acknowledgement – Email Received / Accusé de réception – Courriel reçu
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
On behalf of the Hon. Pierre
Poilievre, we would like to thank you for contacting the Office of the
Leader of the Official Opposition.
Mr.
Poilievre greatly values feedback and input from Canadians. We wish to
inform you that the Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition
reads and reviews every e-mail we receive. Please
note that this account receives a high volume of e-mails, and we
endeavour to reply as quickly as possible.
If you are a constituent of Mr.
Poilievre in the riding of Battle River - Crowfoot and you have an
urgent matter to discuss, please contact his constituency office at:
Phone: 1-780-608-4600
Fax: 1-780-608-4603
Hon. Pierre Poilievre, M.P.
Battle River – Crowfoot
Au nom de l’honorable Pierre
Poilievre, nous tenons à vous remercier d’avoir communiqué avec le
Bureau du chef de l’Opposition officielle.
M. Poilievre
accorde une grande importance aux commentaires et aux suggestions des
Canadiens. Nous tenons à vous informer que le Bureau du chef de
l’Opposition officielle lit et examine tous les
courriels qu’il reçoit. Veuillez noter que ce compte reçoit un volume
important de courriels et que nous nous efforçons d’y répondre le plus
rapidement possible.
Si vous êtes un électeur de
M. Poilievre dans la circonscription de Battle River - Crowfoot et que
vous avez une question urgente à discuter, veuillez contacter son bureau
de circonscription :
Téléphone : 1-780-608-4600
Télécopieur : 1-780-608-4603
L’honorable Pierre Poilievre, député
Battle River – Crowfoot
4945, 50 Street
Camrose (Alberta) T4V 1P9
Encore une fois, merci de votre message.
Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées,
Bureau du chef de l’Opposition officielle
---------- Original message ---------
From: Moore, Rob - M.P. <Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Sun, Mar 8, 2026 at 3:07PM
Subject: Automatic reply: Canada is breaking its 'sacred oath' to veterans if it passes the Budget Implementation Act unamended
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
*This is an automated response*
Thank
you for contacting the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. office. We
appreciate the time you took to get in touch with our office.
If
you did not already, please ensure to include your full contact details
on your email and the appropriate staff will be able to action your
request. We strive to
ensure all constituent correspondence is responded to in a timely
manner.
If your question or concern is time sensitive, please call our office: 506-832-4200.
Again, we thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts and concerns.
---------- Original message ---------
From: Lawton, Andrew - M.P. <andrew.lawton@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Sun, Mar 8, 2026 at 3:07PM
Subject: Automatic reply: Canada is breaking its 'sacred oath' to veterans if it passes the Budget Implementation Act unamended
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Good day,
Thank you for contacting the office of MP Andrew Lawton.
To help us serve you as quickly as possible, please include your
full name, address with postal code, and phone number if you haven’t already. Priority is given to residents of
Elgin—St. Thomas—London South.
---------- Original message ---------
From: Chong, Michael - M.P. <michael.chong@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Sun, Mar 8, 2026 at 3:07PM
Subject: Automatic reply: Canada is breaking its 'sacred oath' to veterans if it passes the Budget Implementation Act unamended
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thanks very much for getting in touch with me!
This
email is to acknowledge receipt of your message and to let you know that
every incoming email is read and reviewed. A member of my
Wellington-Halton Hills North team will be in touch with
you shortly if follow-up is required.
Due to
the high volume of email correspondence, priority is given to
responding to residents of Wellington-Halton Hills North and to emails
of a non-chain (or “forwards”) variety.
In your email, if you:
·have verified that
you are a constituent by including your complete residential postal
address and a phone number, a response will be provided in a timely
manner.
·have not included
your residential postal mailing address, please resend your email with
your complete residential postal address and phone number, and a
response will be forthcoming.
If you
are not a constituent of Wellington Halton-Hills North, please contact
your Member of Parliament. If you are unsure who your MP is, you can
find them by searching your postal code at
http://www.ourcommons.ca/en
Any
constituents of Wellington-Halton Hills North who require urgent
attention are encouraged to call the constituency office at
1-866-878-5556 (toll-free in riding). Please rest assured that
any voicemails will be returned promptly.
Once again, thank you for your email.
The Hon. Michael Chong, M.P. Wellington-Halton Hills North toll free riding office:1-866-878-5556
THIS
MESSAGE IS ONLY INTENDED FOR THE USE OF THE INTENDED RECIPIENT(S) AND
MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY AND/OR
CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission,
dissemination, distribution, copying, conversion to hard copy or other
use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient and have received this message
in error, please notify me by return e-mail and delete this message
from your system.
---------- Original message ---------
From: Singh, Karunjit (LNG-CAN) <karunjit.singh@lexisnexis.ca>
Date: Sun, Mar 8, 2026 at 3:10PM
Subject: Automatic reply: Canada is breaking its 'sacred oath' to veterans if it passes the Budget Implementation Act unamended
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. I am out
of office until March 9 and will not be checking email at this time. I
will try to respond to you as soon as I can once I get back.
Methinks legions of Veterans would
appreciate somebody ethical checking my work before the Senate does its
third reading of the Budget Implementation Act N'esy Pas???
Law360 Canada (December 23, 2025,
3:09 PM EST) -- The Federal Court has adjourned a certification motion
in a proposed class action challenging the practice of prorating certain
indexation adjustments for veterans’ benefits
pending the outcome of proposed legislation that could end the class
action.
In St-Jean v. Canada, 2025 FC 2000,
released on Dec. 18, Justice Russel Zinn concluded it was in the
interests of justice to grant the requested adjournment rather than
press on with the certification
motion.
“I have reached this conclusion primarily on the basis that justice is
better served in proceeding when it is known whether the provisions of
Bill C-15 have received assent,” the judge wrote.
The plaintiff, André St-Jean, sought to represent a class of individuals
who were affected by the practice of prorating certain indexation
adjustments for certain financial benefits, including the earnings loss
benefit (ELB), the retirement income security
benefit (RISB) and the income replacement benefit (IRB), available to
disabled veterans.
The lawsuit alleges that between April 2006 and April 2019, Canada
adopted the practice of prorating the indexation of inputs on which
benefits were calculated.
The plaintiff alleges the practice resulted in the putative class of
more than 40,000 disabled veterans being paid less than the fully
indexed benefits to which they were otherwise entitled based on annual
adjustments reflecting increases in the consumer price
index.
In April 2019, the Veterans Well-being Act and Veterans Well-being Regulations came into force and expressly forbade the practice.
On Nov. 18, 2025, the federal government tabled Bill C-15, which
proposes to amend, with retroactive effect, provisions of the
Regulations to specify that the first annual indexation adjustments to
certain amounts used in the calculation of the ELB are to be
prorated.
Canada sought an adjournment of the certification motion on the basis
that the bill, if enacted, could have a determinative effect on the
certification criteria, particularly on whether the claim discloses a
reasonable cause of action.
Canada also submitted that the length of the requested adjournment would
be relatively short, as the outcome of Bill C-15 is expected to become
clear by April 2026.
The plaintiff opposed adjournment, arguing that it would be uniquely
harmful to the putative class comprised of veterans of the Canadian
Armed Forces who became mentally and/or physically disabled while
serving Canada.
The plaintiff also submitted that Canada’s conduct in advancing Bill
C-15 is aimed at thwarting the proposed class from exercising their
existing rights and providing
ex post facto legislative authority for the practice of prorating the benefits.
He further submitted that he intended to mount a challenge to the
constitutionality of the proposed retroactive legislation if it becomes
law.
Justice Zinn held that justice would be better served in proceeding when
it is known whether the provisions of Bill C-15 have received assent.
“If it does receive assent, then the certification request appears to be
dependent on the validity of the amendments and that will require a
unique finding of the Court based on materials not presently before it,”
the judge wrote.
He further noted that if the proposed amendments do not receive assent
or are amended such that they have no impact on the action, the
certification motion would have suffered only a slight delay, with
little to no prejudice to either party.
The court granted Canada’s motion to adjourn the certification motion.
Counsel for the plaintiff, Malcolm Ruby of Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP,
said the government was seeking to retroactively give itself authority
for conduct that lacked statutory authorization.
“I believe it’s the intention of the federal government to end the class
action through the legislation,” Ruby told Law360 Canada.
Ruby added that the government is also attempting to shut down two other lawsuits through retroactive legislation: Estate of Gordon Allen and Stanley Broski v. His Majesty the King
and Raymond White et al. v. His Majesty the King.
White et al. is a certified class action alleging that Veterans
Affairs Canada miscalculated annual pension indexation by using the
wrong comparators, contrary to statutory requirements, while the Estate of Gordon Allen and Stanley Broski concerns
allegations that veterans who received long-term care benefits under the Veterans Health Care Regulations were overcharged for the cost of that care.
Ruby said retroactive legislation is rare, describing it as a “thermonuclear weapon” in litigation.
He added that if Bill C-15 is enacted, the plaintiff intends to argue
that putative class members are being discriminated against on the basis
of disability.
Adam Bazak of Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP, Angela Bespflug of Murphy
Battista LLP and Donnaree Nygard of Nygard Legal also acted as counsel
for the plaintiff.
Counsel for Canada were Laura Tausky, Asad Moten, Margaret Cormack and Adam Kouri of the Department of Justice Canada.
If you have any information, story ideas or news tips for
Law360 Canada on business-related law and litigation, including class actions, please contact Karunjit Singh at
karunjit.singh@lexisnexis.ca or 905-415-5859.
Re: Unfair Veterans-related Measures in Bill C-15, Budget 2025 Implementation Act
December 12, 2025
The Honourable Jill McKnight, P.C., M.P.
Minister of Veterans Affairs and Associate Minister of National Defence
66 Slater Street, 16th Floor
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0P4
Re: Unfair Veterans-related Measures in Bill C-15, Budget 2025 Implementation Act
Dear Minister McKnight,
After careful review, and after hearing many concerns
from the Veteran community, I must point out the unfairness I believe
will result from certain retroactive measures contained within the
Budget 2025 Implementation Act (Bill C-15).
Contrary to what was originally intended in the Interpretation Act, sections 373-375 of Bill C-15 would retroactively redefine “province” to exclude the territories in the
Veterans Health Care Regulations as it relates to Accommodations
and Meals payment by some Veterans in long term care. In so doing,
Veterans Affairs Canada would effectively legitimize its past
overcharges to Veterans and nullify ongoing litigation aimed
at securing reimbursement for affected Veterans.
It is inconceivable that the Department of Justice and Veterans Affairs Canada personnel who drafted the
Veterans Health Care Regulations would have been unaware of the Interpretation Act
that has for many decades prior to 1993 expressly defined “province” to
include the territories. Indeed, the Department of Justice had
published internal guidance
that references the Interpretation Act in their 1995 “Guide to
the Making of Federal Acts and Regulations”. Therefore, one must assume
that the drafters understood that the word “province” in the
Veterans Health Care Regulations was meant to include the
territories and thus conclude that the Department made a mistake in not
doing so when undertaking the Accommodations and Meals calculations.
I believe that using retroactive legislation to
correct administrative errors is both inappropriate and unfair and
undermines confidence in government decision-making, sets a troubling
precedent, and denies justice to those who served our
country. Normally, retroactive provisions are limited to changes in
legislation or regulations only back to the date of a formal government
announcement of such intended change; for example, a change in tax rules
announced in a budget and made retroactive
in a budget implementation act to the date of the budget announcement.
In this case, however, retroactivity of almost 30 years is
extraordinary; the amendments proposed in Bill C-15 should be
prospective only.
Ultimately, it is clear to the Veteran community that
Bill C-15 sections 373-375 are meant solely to correct an error made by
the Department and to deny them compensation for the overcharge. VAC
already faces growing reputational backlash
over the manner in which it communicates with Canada’s Veterans, their
families and Survivors. I fear this retroactivity measure, if enacted,
will only increase the deep distrust in Veterans Affairs Canada that,
sadly, I hear about far too often.
On behalf of our most elderly and disabled Veterans
who would be unfairly and disproportionately affected by these
retroactive amendments, I would ask that they be removed from Bill
C-15. Beyond that, I believe acknowledging the error and
making whole those Veterans who were affected would be a step in the
right direction towards regaining the trust of this community.
We are here to assist when you feel you have been treated unfairly by Veterans Affairs Canada. We know you may be frustrated. But we cannot accept discriminatory, abusive or inappropriate
language when we are communicating. Your respectful interaction with us helps us to help you.
Submit a Complaint
If you want to submit a complaint, please use our
complaint form. It's the best and safest way to send us your information. We do not accept complaints by email.
You can also call us: Telephone (toll-free): 1-877-330-4343 or TTY:
1-833-902-9399
OR reach us by mail: Office of the Veterans Ombud, P.O. Box 66 Charlottetown, PE C1A 7K2
If you have a general question about our office or what we do, you can email us at
info@ombudsman-veterans.gc.ca. Please don’t send complaints or personal information to this email.
"Counsel fees are going to be closely scrutinized here, both by the
claimant community and the broader Canadian public," Vickery said
another mouthfull
> From: magicJack <voicemail@notify.magicjack.com>
> Subject: New VM (21) - 0:08 minutes in your magicJack mailbox from "PETER MILLIKEN" <6134534040>
> To: "DAVID AMOS"
> Date: Friday, December 5, 2014, 2:14 PM
> Dear magicJack User:
>
> You received a new 0:08 minutes voicemail message, on
> Friday, December 05, 2014 at 04:14:22 PM in mailbox
> 9028000369 from "PETER MILLIKEN"
> <6134534040>.
>
Travis A. Henderson Counsel
Called to the bar: 2009 (ON)
Justice Canada
Mgmt. of Class Actions & Mass Litigation Unit
50 O'Connor St.
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H8
Phone: 613-670-6374
Fax: 613-941-5879
Email: travis.henderson@justice.gc.ca
Assistant David Raymond (WOW want a coincidence or what?)
"The lawsuit was filed in fall 2012 by the group that claims the New
Veterans Charter is unconstitutional and violates the Charter of
Rights and Freedoms. It was approved by a unanimous vote of Parliament
in 2006 and amended in 2011 as a result of public outcry.
Current and former Canadian Forces members are appalled that the
lifetime disability pension for disabled soldiers has been replaced by
lump-sum payments.
Inside court, government lawyer Paul Vickery told a three-judge panel
the appeal was necessary because the soldiers’ claims could negatively
impact fundamental democratic principles.
He told court that while the government readily acknowledges the great
value and sacrifice of the soldiers, Parliament is the “only
appropriate forum” for resolving the claims made in the lawsuit.
“The appeal which the attorney general brings before you is not
brought out of any lack of appreciation of those services,” Vickery
said.
A second federal lawyer then attacked the plaintiffs’ main argument
that they deserve benefits in line with the previous regime, the
Pension Act, based on historical promises. He did not dispute that the
new scheme is “less generous.”
Your boss Petey Baby MacKay must emember this video EH?
This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
Graham of the RCMP °J" Division in Fredericton.
Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada and
the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>
http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: PCC Complaints <complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
>> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:59:52 +0000
>> Subject: The Commission for Public Complaints against RCMP - #2013-2824
>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>
>> This is further to your recent communications with the Commission.
>> From September 18, 2013 to the present, our office has received 6
>> electronic messages from you. Many of these e-mails are not related to
>> RCMP conduct.
>>
>> On October 1, 2013, you called our office and spoke with an Intake
>> Officer. You wished to enquire about three complaint files. When the
>> Intake Officer attempted to inform you that you have three enquiry
>> files with the Commission, you became agitated and insisted otherwise.
>> You raised your voice and spoke over the Intake Officer. You then
>> demanded the name of the Intake Officer, and subsequently yelled "see
>> you in federal court" and hung up the telephone line.
>>
>> As a reminder, we request that all future correspondence with our
>> office must be courteous in tone and that you are respectful of the
>> requests that are made of you. While it is clearly not the intention
>> of the Commission to prevent you from making complaints against
>> members of the RCMP, your recent emails and telephone call have been
>> unproductive for both you and for Commission staff. In the future, we
>> request that all communication with our office be respectful in
>> language and related to our mandate. In the event that this request
>> is not respected, the Commission will consider imposing restrictions
>> on how you may communicate with our office.
>>
>> Should you have a complaint about a specific RCMP member surrounding a
>> specific incident, I invite you to visit the Commission's website
>> (www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca<http://www.cpc-cpp.gc.ca>) to submit an online
>> complaint, rather than to send an email that is difficult to follow or
>> a copy of a letter you have sent to many others. The complaint form
>> will guide you through the information required that will enable the
>> Commission to process your complaint. Should you have difficulty in
>> accessing the complaint form and wish to have one sent to you, you may
>> provide your mailing address and a form will be mailed to you via
>> Canada Post.
>>
>> I would also invite you to send your correspondence regarding any new
>> or existing complaints (quoting the appropriate Commission file
>> number) by letter mail to:
>>
>> Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP
>> National Intake Office
>> PO Box 88689
>> Surrey, BC V3W 0X1
>>
>> Yours truly,
>>
>> Günther Schönfeldt
>> Intake Officer / Agent d'information de liaison
>> Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP /
>> Commission des plaintes du public contre la Gendarmerie royale du Canada
>> Tel/Tél : 1-800-665-6878 | Fax/Téléc : (604) 501-4095
>> complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca<mailto:complaints@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>
>>
>> [Description: Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CCF6DA.65AE7FE0]
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: !enquiries <enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk>
>> Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:56:26 +0100
>> Subject: IPCC Reference: 2013/015918
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Dear Mr Amos
>>
>> I acknowledge receipt of 4 emails at the Independent Police Complaints
>> Commission (IPCC) earlier today.
>>
>> I note from our records that you have been advised on the IPCC remit,
>> as well as spoken with one of my colleagues in the customer contact
>> team. It remains unclear from your emails what your complaint against
>> the police is. This may be because you refer to a number of other
>> organisations, or matters outside of the IPCC's remit.
>>
>> If you wish to make a complaint against the police you should provide
>> these details to either the IPCC or the relevant police force's
>> professional standards department (PSD).
>>
>> The IPCC does not investigate allegations of crime(s) committed by
>> members of the public, nor can we direct a police force to commence an
>> investigation into such.
>>
>> If you have any queries about the IPCC's remit or the complaints
>> process please contact us. However, emails to the IPCC that fall
>> outside of our remit will be read and filed, but may not be responded
>> to.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> Elly Goodman
>> Customer Contact Adviser
>> Independent Police Complaints Commission
>> Tel: 0300 020 0096
>> Email: enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
>>
>>
>> The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
>> Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in
>> partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On
>> leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
>> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
>> and/or recorded for legal purposes.
>>
>>
>> Talk about pissing a guy off. EH Ian McPhail? What planet do CROWN's
>> bureaucrats come from anyway?
>>
>> Need I say BULLSHIT once again??? The other CROWN Corp commonly know
>> as the CBC often puts that word over our airwaves so that can't be
>> offensive. That said I bet the call was recorded If so I demand a copy
>> ASAP. Next time I call I will record the call myself.
>>
>> I must ask did the oh so silent boss Ian MacPhail and his buddy Bob
>> Paulson about the Yankee wiretap tapes being evidence of MURDER?
>> Better check the Canadian Ciminal Code about assisting in the cover up
>> of such crimes EH?
>>
>> As for the call I remember it like it was yesterday. Howcome it took
>> Günther Schönfeldt three weeks to dream up the same sort of response I
>> got in 2007??? The first thing I did was ask for him and the woman
>> claimed he was not avaible and offered to help. She started out quite
>> nice but as soon as she admited that there was only a faxed complaint
>> in November of 2003 and that it did not warrant an answer I told her
>> to look some more. She got fairly argumentive and did not wish to
>> discuss the complaint I sent in August of 2005 (It appeared to me that
>> she read something in my file) I gave up and asked her name when she
>> got to snarky and she refused to give other than "Nora" So I said Cya
>> in Federal Court and hung up. The I sent your buddy Bob Paulson and
>> YOU Ian McPhail a Motherload of emails but I did only sent your
>> mindless bureaucrats six that were largely unrelated if they did not
>> know how to read deep.
>>
>> However your Commission should not deny that I argued with its former
>> lawyer/boss Shirley Heafey about the aforesaid compliant in 2005
>> within emails sent to many Parliamentarians months for a I ran for a
>> sent Parliament again and she was replaced by the lawyer Paul Kennedy.
>> (The lawyer Heafey and your Commission always denied that complaint
>> existed until your office sent me a similar bullshit email after Mike
>> Murphy a former Minister of Health and later another former Attorney
>> General asked Deputy Commissioner Steve Graham to investigate my
>> concerns.
>>
>> In return the Graham got transferred to Nova Scotia and RCMP falsely
>> arrested REMEMBER Stevey Boy Harper?
>>
>> As I said Cya'll in Federal Court
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 1 902 800 0369
>>
>>
http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>
>>
http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that
>> these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in
>> contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Lisa Porteous <lporteous@kleinlyons.com>
>> Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 14:46:22 +0000
>> Subject: RCMP
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> David,
>>
>> Thank you for your email inquiring about our class action against the
>> RCMP. As you may know, the Notice of Claim was filed in the British
>> Columbia Supreme Court on March 27, 2012. The lawsuit has been
>> brought by former RCMP constable Janet Merlo on behalf of female RCMP
>> members. Unfortunately, we cannot assist you with your claim.
>>
>> We recommend that you contact Mr. Barry Carter of Mair Jensen Blair
>> LLP to discuss any claim you may have against the RCMP for harassment.
>> His contact information is as follows:
>>
>> Mr. Barry Carter
>> Mair Jensen Blair LLP
>> 1380-885 W. Georgia Street
>> Vancouver, BC V6C 3E8
>> Phone: 604-682-6299
>> Fax 1-604-374-6992
>>
>> This is not intended to be an opinion concerning the merits of your
>> case. In declining to represent you, we are not expressing an opinion
>> as to whether you should take further action in this matter.
>>
>> You should be aware that there may be strict time limitations within
>> which you must act in order to protect your rights. Failure to begin
>> your lawsuit by filing an action within the required time may mean
>> that you could be barred forever from pursuing a claim. Therefore, you
>> should immediately contact another lawyer ( as indicated above) to
>> obtain legal advice/representation.
>>
>> Thank you again for considering our firm.
>>
>> Yours truly,
>>
>> Lisa Porteous
>> Case Manager/Paralegal
>>
>> lporteous@kleinlyons.com
>> www.kleinlyons.com
>>
>> KLEIN * LYONS
>> Suite 400-1385 West 8th Avenue
>> Vancouver BC V6H 3V9 Canada
>> Office 604.874.7171
>> Fax 604.874.7180
>> Direct 604.714.6533
>>
>> This email is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client
>> privilege. It is intended only for the use of the person to whom it is
>> addressed. Any distribution, copying or other use by anyone else is
>> strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
>> telephone us immediately and destroy this e-mail.
>>
>> üPlease consider the environment before printing this email.
Perhaps Mr Vickery should Google his name and mine to find such things as this
No comments:
Post a Comment