Thursday, 28 September 2017

CBC says Suppressing unwanted views never works Survey Says???

---------- Original message ----------
From: Michael Cohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 16:59:01 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Kevin Gosine I just called and left you
a voicemail and sent you this email because I agree with your words
published by the Toronto Star
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
directed to 646-853-0114.
________________________________
This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its affiliates.
Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an electronic
signature under applicable law.
 


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
 

Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 11:58:09 -0400
Subject: Attn Kevin Gosine I just called and left you a voicemail and sent you this email 

because I agree with your words published by the Toronto Star
To: kgosine@brocku.ca, newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, 

news <news@kingscorecord.com>, news <news@hilltimes.com>, 
news <news@dailymail.co.uk>, newstips <newstips@cnn.com>, 
lionel <lionel@lionelmedia.com>, RT-US <RT-US@rttv.ru>, 
 investigations <investigations@cbc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Mark.Wright" <Mark.Wright@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, david <david@lutz.nb.ca>,
"David.Akin" <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, nmoore <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>,
"Jean-Yves.Duclos" <Jean-Yves.Duclos@parl.gc.ca>, cullen1 <cullen1@parl.gc.ca>, 

leader <leader@greenparty.ca>, leader <leader@labour.org.uk>, 
"boris.johnson.mp" <boris.johnson.mp@parliament.uk>, 
"Bill.Casey" <Bill.Casey@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, redicecreations@gmail.com

paul <paul@paulfromm.com>, Brian Ruhe <brian@brianruhe.ca>, 
arthur <arthur@radicalpress.com>, Monika Schaefer <monika_schaefer@hotmail.com>, 
monica <monica@actuslaw.com>, ddale <ddale@thestar.ca>, 
DJT <DJT@trumporg.com>, djtjr <djtjr@trumporg.com>,  
Field Mcconnell <fieldmcc@yahoo.com>, mcohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>,  
littlefarm1 <littlefarm1@windstream.net>,COCMoncton <COCMoncton@gmail.com>,
"George.Soros" <George.Soros@opensocietyfoundations.org>,
markandcaroline <markandcaroline@gmail.com>


https://www.thestar.com/opinion/commentary/2017/10/03/canadian-social-rights-activists-are-legitimizing-the-alt-right.html

Canadian social rights activists are legitimizing the alt-right

‘Not all right-wing thought constitutes hate speech, and we need to
identify the dividing line. Open debate and dialogue in a university
lecture hall is a far better scenario than a Canadian
Charlottesville.’

By Kevin Gosine
Tues., Oct. 3, 2017

https://brocku.ca/social-sciences/sociology/people/kevin-gosine/

Kevin Gosine
Associate Professor, Sociology & Graduate Program Director

Office: STH 427A
905-688-5550 x4412
kgosine@brocku.ca

Education:
PhD, York University
MSW, University of Toronto
BA, York University

Kevin Gosine’s primary areas of research interest include the critical
study of ethnicity and racialization, youth studies, social identity
construction, the sociology of education, and social welfare.
Previous published work has explored processes of multiple and
diasporic identity construction and cultural negotiation among highly
educated and upwardly mobile Black Canadians, which entailed an
examination of the relationship between highly accomplished Black
North Americans and antiracism.  In collaboration with Dr. Gordon Pon
of Ryerson University, he has also published work that examined racial
bias and disporportionality within Ontario’s child welfare system.
Recently, Dr. Gosine led a research team that examined intersections
of race and class, communal identity and academic engagement among
marginalized youth in Toronto’s Regent Park community.  A Public
Health Agency of Canada Research Grant (which Dr. Gosine held in
partnerhsip with Pathways Canada) supported this latter project.
Alongside his ongoing research on marginalized urban youth subcultures
and secondary schooling, Dr. Gosine is currently collaborating with
Dr. Michelle Webber (Sociology) and Professor Glenn Skrubbeltrang
(Goodman School of Business) to examine the workplace experiences, job
satisfaction, and academic identities of limited term
(non-tenured/non-tenure stream) faculty in Canadian universities.

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/09/cbc-says-suppressing-unwanted-views.html

Thursday, 28 September 2017

CBC says Suppressing unwanted views never works Survey Says???



---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 16:26:32 +0000
Subject: RE: James Turk at Free Expression did not pick his phones so
I called the Snobby Hong Kong dude Sandy Boucher and he certainly
remembered me as I spoke of the Supreme Court
 
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.



---------- Original message ----------
From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>

 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 16:26:34 +0000
Subject: Re: James Turk at Free Expression did not pick his phones so
I called the Snobby Hong Kong dude Sandy Boucher and he certainly
remembered me as I spoke of the Supreme Court

To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>


Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið  / Your request has been received

Kveðja / Best regards
Forsætisráðuneytið  / Prime Minister's Office


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 11:21:16 -0400
Subject: James Turk at Free Expression did not pick his phones so I called the Snobby Hong Kong dude Sandy Boucher and he certainly remembered me as I spoke of the Supreme Court
To: Sandy.Boucher@ca.gt.com, "jacqueline.maarse" <jacqueline.maarse@ca.gt.com>, stephen.davidson@saintjohn.ca,
jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca
"Furey, John" <jfurey@nbpower.com>, Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, Mary.Lynk@cbc.ca
"allan.cutler" <allan.cutler@canadians4accountability.org>, cfe@ryerson.ca
david <david@fairwhistleblower.ca>,  Ideas.Proposals@cbc.ca
"ht.lacroix" <ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>, "hon.melanie.joly" <hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca>, 
"Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, wharrison <wharrison@nbpower.com>,
"len.hoyt" <len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>, ecdesmond <ecdesmond@nbeub.ca>,
"Senator.Sinclair" <Senator.Sinclair@sen.parl.gc.ca>, dayja <dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca>,
"wayne.easter" <wayne.easter@parl.gc.ca>,  "dean.buzza" <dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Diane.Lebouthillier" <Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc.ca>,
George J Russell TIGTA <j.Russell.George@tigta.treas.gov>,
"mark.vespucci" <mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov>,
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
ethics-ethique <ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Liliana.Longo" <Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
 "hon.ralph.goodale" <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, postur <postur@for.is>,
smari <smari@immi.is>, editor <editor@wikileaks.org>,
 mcohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>, briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>,
"brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, "dominic.leblanc" <dominic.leblanc@nb.aibn.com>, 
"David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "guy.caron" <guy.caron@parl.gc.ca>, 
"andrew.scheer" <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/09/cbc-says-suppressing-unwanted-views.html

Thursday, 28 September 2017


CBC says Suppressing unwanted views never works Survey Says???

 

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Kelly, John" <john.e.kelly@tsa.dhs.gov>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 18:25:14 +0000
Subject: RE: New response to your FOI request - Do You know who I am
and why I have a lawsuit against your Queen?

To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Sir,

I believe you have addressed and sent your email to the wrong John
Kelly.  I am not the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security.

I suggest that you should seek out and identify the correct electronic
message address for the intended recipient you want to address.

Please note that, I am not at liberty to provide you with any email
addresses and I respectfully ask you to remove my email address from
your contact list and any distribution lists.

Thank you in advance.

V/r,

John E. Kelly


-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2017 8:53 AM
To: team@whatdotheyknow.com; boris.johnson.mp; theresa.may.mp; pm;
postur; Elizabeth.Denham; freedomtalkradio2013; Field Mcconnell;
James.Comey; bob.paulson; hon.ralph.goodale; John.Kelly; alan
dransfield; B.English; philip.hammond.mp@parliament.uk;
public.enquiries@hmtreasury.gsi.gov.uk; jo.johnson.mp@parliament.uk;
Bill.Morneau; bill.pentney; mcu; jan.jensen; Jody.Wilson-Raybould.a1;
Malcolm.Turnbull.MP; elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca
Cc: David Amos; press; Andrew.Bailey; oig; premier; brian.gallant;
brian.maude; rjgillis; curtis; oldmaison; Jacques.Poitras; Robert.
Jones; newsroom; news; nmoore; steve.murphy
Subject: RE: New response to your FOI request - Do You know who I am
and why I have a lawsuit against your Queen?

I see nothing wrong with posting true facts and seeking answers. Why
do you people?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: WhatDoTheyKnow <team@whatdotheyknow.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 13:07:04 +0000
Subject: New response to your FOI request - Do You know who I am and
why I have a lawsuit against your Queen?
To: David Raymond Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

You have a new response to the Freedom of Information request 'Do You
know who I am and why I have a lawsuit against your Queen?'
that you made to
Attorney General’s Office.

To view the response, click on the link below.

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/do_you_know_who_i_am_and_why_i_h?nocache=incoming-943496#incoming-943496

When you get there, please update the status to say if the response
contains any useful information.

Although all responses are automatically published, we depend on you,
the original requester, to evaluate them.

-- the WhatDoTheyKnow team

Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:

[1]FOI requests at Attorney General’s Office Your message wasn't
delivered because of security policies. Microsoft Exchange will not
try to redeliver this message for you. Please provide the following
diagnostic text to your system administrator.


Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 13:06:34 +0000
Subject: Freedom of Information request - Do You know who I am and why
I have a lawsuit against your Queen?
From: David Raymond Amos <[FOI #392013 email]>
To: "FOI requests at Attorney General’s Office" <[Attorney General’s
Office request email]>

Dear Attorney General’s Office,

If so what documents about me do you have in your possession and will
provide them to me ASAP byway of email?

Clearly  my fellow Canadian Elizabeth Denham, Ms May your latest Prime
Minister, Rt. Hon. Boris Johnson, the recently elected President Trump
and his lawyers and the Prime Minister of Iceland to mention but a few
know exactly who I am and what my concerns are just as many others did
long before I ran for a seat in the 38th Parliament of Canada in 2004
correct?

---------- Original message ----------
From: Póstur FOR <[email address]>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:51:41 +0000
Subject: Re: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump
I just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
does he lie to me after all this time???
To: David Amos <[email address]>

Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið  / Your request has been received

Kveðja / Best regards
Forsætisráðuneytið  / Prime Minister's Office



---------- Original message ----------
From: "MAY, Theresa" <[email address]>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 21:10:53 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Whereas the UKIP NEVER had any time to talk
to me about the financial industry now I have even less of my precious
time for them just like wannabe Consevative leaders who try to play
dumb
To: David Amos <[email address]>

This is the email account for The Rt Hon Theresa May MP's work as
Member of Parliament for Maidenhead. If you live in the Maidenhead
constituency, please ensure that you have included your full address
in your email. We will respond to you as soon as possible.

If your email is for the Prime Minister and not constituency related,
please re-send to Downing Street at: https://email.number10.gov.uk/
Your email will not be forwarded on.

UK Parliament Disclaimer: This e-mail is confidential to the intended
recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or
copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses,
but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus
transmitted by this e-mail. This e-mail address is not secure, is not
encrypted and should not be used for sensitive data.

UK Parliament Disclaimer: This e-mail is confidential to the intended
recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or
copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses,
but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus
transmitted by this e-mail. This e-mail address is not secure, is not
encrypted and should not be used for sensitive data.

---------- Original message ----------
From: "JOHNSON, Boris" <[email address]>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 02:11:56 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: HEY Alan Dransfield and Elizabeth Denham RE
"Data Protection" and the Social Contract with Mark Carney, Theresa
May and Katy.Bourne
To: David Amos <[email address]>

The Rt. Hon. Boris Johnson MP
Member of Parliament for Uxbridge and South Ruislip Secretary of State
for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Thank you for contacting Boris
Johnson MP.  Please note that this email account is for constituency
and other enquiries in my role as Member of Parliament for Uxbridge
and South Ruislip.

If you are a resident of Uxbridge and South Ruislip, please ensure
that you have included your full name and address.  No emails will be
answered without full address and contact details.

Please note emails relating to the Foreign Office will not be replied
to.  If you are contacting me about my responsibilities as Foreign
Secretary, you should re-send your email to:

[email address]

UK Parliament Disclaimer: This e-mail is confidential to the intended
recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or
copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses,
but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus
transmitted by this e-mail. This e-mail address is not secure, is not
encrypted and should not be used for sensitive data.

>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Póstur FOR <[email address]>
>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:05:47 +0000
>> Subject: Re: Hey Premier Gallant please inform the questionable
>> parliamentarian Birigtta Jonsdottir that although NB is a small "Have
>> Not" province at least we have twice the population of Iceland and
>> that not all of us are as dumb as she and her Prime Minister pretends
>> to be..
>> To: David Amos <[email address]>
>>
>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið  / Your request has been received
>>
>> Kveðja / Best regards
>> Forsætisráðuneytið  / Prime Minister's Office
>>
>>
>> This is the docket
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.ph
>> p?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>>
>> These are digital recordings of  the last two hearings
>>
>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>>
>> Jan 11th https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>>
>> This me running for a seat in Parliament again while CBC denies it
>> again
>>
>> Fundy Royal, New Brunswick Debate – Federal Elections 2015 - The
>> Local Campaign, Rogers TV
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cFOKT6TlSE
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profil
>> e-1.3274276
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>>

Yours faithfully,

David Raymond Amos

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #392013 email]

Is [Attorney General’s Office request email] the wrong address for
Freedom of Information requests to Attorney General’s Office? If so,
please contact us using this form:

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/change_request/new?body=attorney_generals_office

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published
on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/officers

For more detailed guidance on safely disclosing information, read the
latest advice from the ICO:
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/ico-guidance-for-authorities

If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web
manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.


-------------------------------------------------------------------

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________




---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:51:14 -0400
Subject: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump I
just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
does he lie to me after all this time???
To: president <president@whitehouse.gov>, mdcohen212@gmail.com, pm
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, Pierre-Luc.Dusseault@parl.gc.ca, MulcaT
<MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, Jean-Yves.Duclos@parl.gc.ca,
B.English@ministers.govt.nz, Malcolm.Turnbull.MP@aph.gov.au,
pminvites@pmc.gov.au, mayt@parliament.uk, press
<press@bankofengland.co.uk>, "Andrew.Bailey"
<Andrew.Bailey@fca.org.uk>,
fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca, newsroom
<newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, "CNN.Viewer.Communications.Management"
<CNN.Viewer.Communications.Management@cnn.com>, news-tips
<news-tips@nytimes.com>, lionel <lionel@lionelmedia.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, "justin.ling@vice.com, elizabeththompson"
<elizabeththompson@ipolitics.ca>, djtjr <djtjr@trumporg.com>,
"Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, postur <postur@for.is>,
stephen.kimber@ukings.ca, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
"Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, oldmaison
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>

---------- Original message ----------
From: Michael Cohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:15:14 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA ATTN Pierre-Luc.Dusseault I just
called and left a message for you
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
directed to 646-853-0114.
________________________________
This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its
affiliates.Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an
electronic signature under applicable law.

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Finance Public / Finance Publique (FIN)"
<fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:05:00 +0000
Subject: RE: Yo President Trump RE the Federal Court of Canada File No
T-1557-15 lets see how the media people do with news that is NOT FAKE
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Joly, Mélanie (PCH)" <hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:16:17 +0000
Subject: Accusé de réception / Acknowledge Receipt
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable Mélanie Joly, ministre du Patrimoine canadien.

La ministre est toujours heureuse de prendre connaissance des
commentaires de Canadiens sur des questions d'importance pour eux.
Votre courriel sera lu avec soin.
Si votre courriel porte sur une demande de rencontre ou une invitation
à une activité particulière, nous tenons à vous assurer que votre
demande a été notée et qu'elle recevra toute l'attention voulue.

**********************

Thank you for writing to the Honourable Mélanie Joly, Minister of
Canadian Heritage.

The Minister is always pleased to hear the comments of Canadians on
subjects of importance to them. Your email will be read with care.
If your email relates to a meeting request or an invitation to a
specific event, please be assured that your request has been noted and
will be given every consideration.


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Hancox, Rick  (FCNB)" <rick.hancox@fcnb.ca>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:15:22 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA ATTN Pierre-Luc.Dusseault I just
called and left a message for you
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

G'Day/Bonjour,

Thanks for your e-mail. I am out of the office until 24 February. If
you need more immediate assistance, please contact France Bouchard at
506 658-2696.

Je serai absent du bureau jusqu'au 24 fevrier  Durant mon absence,
veuillez contacter France Bouchard au 506 658-2696 pour assistance
immédiate.

Thanks/Merci Rick

---------- Original message ----------
From: "B English (MIN)" <B.English@ministers.govt.nz>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 04:46:16 +0000
Subject: Automated response from the office of Hon Bill English
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email to the Prime Minister.

This is an automated response.

Please be assured that any matters you raise in your email will be
noted; however, not all messages will receive an individual response.

Yours sincerely
The Office of the Prime Minister


---------- Original message ----------
From: Jean-Yves.Duclos@parl.gc.ca
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 15:48:00 +0000
Subject: Merci / Thank you
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Bonjour,

Nous vous remercions d'avoir communiqué avec le bureau de Jean-Yves
Duclos, député de Québec et Ministre de la Famille, des Enfants et du
Développement social.

Ce courriel confirme la réception de votre correspondance.

Veuillez prendre note que votre demande sera traitée dans les meilleurs délais.

Salutations distinguées,

Bureau de circonscription de Jean-Yves Duclos

Hello,

Thank you for contacting the office of Jean-Yves Duclos, M.P for
Québec and Minister of Families, Children and Social Development.

This email confirms the receipt of your message.

Please note that your request will be processed as soon as possible.

With our best regards,

The riding office of Jean-Yves Duclos



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 20:44:27 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Hey Elizabeth Tompson RE your concrens about the PCO and
the TPP We talked once again yesterday and as usual you were too busy
to listen to me but I also called many of your associates in the
Parliamentry Press Galllery and some did listen to me Correct?
To: gerry@marinerpartners.com, "Stephen.Horsman"
<Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca>, customerservice@schiffradio.com,
curtis@marinerpartners.com, "rick.hancox" <rick.hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca>,
rjgillis@gmglaw.com, rgfaloon@gmglaw.com, "sally.gomery"
<sally.gomery@nortonrosefulbright.com>, ahamilton
<ahamilton@casselsbrock.com>, "bruce.northrup"
<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, bruce <bruce@brucehyer.ca>, "bruce.fitch"
<bruce.fitch@gnb.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 10:13:15 -0400
Subject: Hey Elizabeth Tompson RE your concerns about the PCO and the
TPP We talked once again yesterday and as usual you were too busy to
listen to me but I also called many of your associates in the
Parliamentry Press Galllery and some did listen to me Correct?
To: elizabeththompson@ipolitics.ca, david@openmedia.org, pm
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>,
"justin.ling" <justin.ling@vice.com>, "rob.moore.a1"
<rob.moore.a1@parl.gc.ca>, jesse <jesse@jessebrown.ca>,
"thomas.mulcair.a1" <thomas.mulcair.a1@parl.gc.ca>, leader
<leader@greenparty.ca>, "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>,
editor@canadalandshow.com, editor <editor@thetyee.ca>, editor
<editor@frankmagazine.ca>, "peacock.kurt"
<peacock.kurt@telegraphjournal.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>,
nbmilk@nbmilk.org, weekesj@bennettjones.com,
mclellana@bennettjones.com, votefast2015@gmail.com,
info@karenmccrimmon.ca, info@marthahallfindlay.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "ed.fast"
<ed.fast@parl.gc.ca>, asiskind@newscorp.com, Rupert.Murdoch@fox.com,
shipshore44 <shipshore44@gmail.com>, investor@newscorp.com,
Claude.J.G.Levesque@inspection.gc.ca, maryann4peace
<maryann4peace@gmail.com>, grant.mccool@thomsonreuters.com,
newsroom@theguardian.pe.ca, Bob.Kerr@cbc.ca,
Susan.J.Collins@bhpbilliton.com, J.Key@ministers.govt.nz,
bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, Andrew.Robb.MP@aph.gov.au, gopublic
<gopublic@cbc.ca>, "marylou.babineau"
<marylou.babineau@greenparty.ca>, policy.karenforcanada@gmail.com,
ritzg <ritzg@parl.gc.ca>, ritzg <ritzg@sasktel.net>,
mgeist@uottawa.ca, birgittaj <birgittaj@althingi.is>, birgittajoy
<birgittajoy@gmail.com>

Here is a little proof to support what I said on the phone.

A debate

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cFOKT6TlSE

and a lawsuit

https://www.scribd.com/doc/281544801/Federal-Court-Seal

https://www.scribd.com/doc/281442628/Me-Versus-the-Crown

FYI During my debates  in Fundy Royal I made certain that Rob Moore
and his boss Harper and the Libranos knew within the emails found
below that I was not talking through my hat with reference to the TPP
false promises dairy farmers and my concerns about the Internet

As you journalists well know I made good on my promise to sue the
CROWN while running for a seat in Parliament one last time. As usual
CBC and most of the other very unethical "journlists" ignored the
obvious except Rogers TV and the local reporters employed by the
Irving billionaires

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-yx8twtlgp4


Clearly Jesse Brown and  his buddy Mean Mikey Geist were yapping about
the TPP before you revealed the PCO's point of view about Harper's
false promise. More importantly to Mean Old Me both those very snobby
and very unethical Upper Canadian spin doctors well aware I knew the
very sneaky Julian Assange long BEFORE he and Birgitta Jonsdotir made
Wikileaks. Hell I have been dicing with  the bast Geist for over ten
years since he stuck his nose in Byron Prior's matters (Another matter
no journalist will report about) Anyone can scroll down or just Google
"Michael Geist" "David Amos" or "Julian Assange"  "David Amos" to see
the proof of what I say is true.

http://canadalandshow.com/podcast/tpp-spying-blocking-and-internet

Katie Jensen • October 12, 2015

Show notes:
University of Ottawa's Michael Geist breaks down the TPP
(Trans-Pacific Partnership), a proposed trade agreement that Stephen
Harper has been toiling over in secret for the last five years - an
agreement that will have huge impacts on Canada's internet freedom and
copyright issues.

Michael Geist's Twitter: @mgeist

I am a law professor at the University of Ottawa where I hold the
Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law. My current
contact information is included below:

Address: University of Ottawa
Faculty of Law
Common Law Section
57 Louis Pasteur
Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5
Canada

Phone: (613) 562-5800 extension 3319
Fax: 613-562-5124
E-mail: mgeist@uottawa.ca


Full text of the TPP leak

http://ipolitics.ca/2015/10/13/pm-lacks-authority-for-promised-4-3b-tpp-farm-compensation-pco-admits/

Harper lacks authorities for promised $4.3B TPP farm compensation, PCO
admits By Elizabeth Thompson | Oct 13, 2015 4:20 am | 1 comment |


http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-election-2015-privy-council-office-transition-government-1.3269132

Privy Council Office tracks party promises to prepare for government
transition Senior public servants log and analyze every election
promise on a daily basis to prep briefing books By Dean Beeby, CBC
News Posted: Oct 14, 2015 5:00 AM ET|


http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-election-2015-trans-pacific-partnership-liberals-pco-1.3273342

Liberals, NDP decline PCO offer of confidential briefing on TPP trade
deal Offer to view trade deal just before election rejected as
'political ploy'
CBC News Posted: Oct 15, 2015 5:11 PM ET|

"Mulcair said Trade Minister Ed Fast broke a promise to make all
details of the accord public ahead of election day.

"Instead of openness and transparency, Canadians are learning details
through leaked information and the government's own self-serving
promotional efforts. That's not acceptable," Mulcair said.

The Privy Council Office is the department that provides non-partisan
support to the prime minister and cabinet. The Conservative campaign
told CBC News the government asked the PCO to offer the briefing to
the opposition parties.

But in a separate letter released Thursday, Liberal candidate John
McCallum accused Prime Minister Stephen Harper of continuing a "lack
of transparency" over the deal's details.

"Despite a commitment by the minister of international trade, Mr. Ed
Fast, to release the text of the agreement so all Canadians can judge
it on its merits before election day, media reports this week state
that the details will remain secret," McCallum wrote.

"It is troubling that with just four days remaining until election
day, you continue to refuse to release the text of the agreement for
Canadians to see."

McCallum noted that a previous briefing attended by party
representatives on Oct. 4 "provided no actual details beyond the
limited information already released publicly."

"It is simply not possible to conduct a meaningful, in-depth analysis
of the 1,500-plus page agreement in 90 minutes," he wrote.

I am included in briefing. I was only leader to participate in the 1st
#TPP briefing. #GPC #elxn42 @CanadianGreens @Politicolnews @PnPCBC

— @ElizabethMay
Conservative campaign spokesman Kory Teneycke told CBC News the
Liberals initially agreed to attend the Friday briefing, while the NDP
declined. Teneycke said the briefing was to be based on the chapter
summaries, since the final text does not exist yet.

A Liberal campaign spokesman referred CBC News to McCallum's letter,
but said any suggestion the party had accepted the offer of the
briefing was false."



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Robb, Andrew (MP)" <Andrew.Robb.MP@aph.gov.au>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 03:51:41 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE TPP Trust that LOTS of Farmers in New
Brunswick and many Yankees, Icelanders and New Zealanders know exactly
who I am EH John Key. Birgitta Jonsdottir, Wayne Easter and Rob Nicholson?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for taking the time to contact me.

This is an automatically generated reply so that you know that your
email has arrived.

As you will appreciate given the large number of emails received each
day, a reply cannot be sent immediately, nor can a reply be sent to
every email received.

I will however read your correspondence.

I prioritise emails from my constituents and those relating to my
trade, investment and tourism portfolio.

If your email relates to my responsibilities as Minister for Trade and
Investment, I will consider your correspondence and respond if
appropriate.

If your email is part of an automatically generated campaign, I will
note your views.

For those interested, there is a significant amount of useful facts
regarding the China FTA and Trans Pacific Partnership on my
Department’s website:

http://dfat.gov.au/trade/agreements/chafta/Pages/australia-china-fta.aspx

and

http://dfat.gov.au/trade/agreements/tpp/Pages/trans-pacific-partnership-agreement-tpp.aspx


In the meantime, you may be interested in completing my community
survey by clicking
here<http://www.andrewrobb.com.au/Goldstein/OnlineSurvey.aspx>. You
may also be interested in visiting my
website<http://www.andrewrobb.com.au/>,
Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/AndrewRobbMP>,
Twitter<https://twitter.com/andrewrobbmp>, or
YouTube<https://www.youtube.com/user/AndrewRobbMP> pages.

Yours sincerely,
ANDREW ROBB
Minister for Trade & Investment
Federal Member for Goldstein

E: andrew.robb.mp@aph.gov.au<mailto:andrew.robb.mp@aph.gov.au>

Electorate Office
368 Centre Road, Bentleigh VIC 3204
P  03 9557 4644   F  03 9557 2906

Parliament House
Suite M1-22
Parliament House
Canberra ACT 2600
P (02) 6277 7420   F (02) 6273 4128

W: www.andrewrobb.com.au<https://outlook.parl.net/OWA/redir.aspx?SURL=5XhEfehgGAPbH9RBhopKzfe0MmE-xOWdR3wTtI1exHGTyZs9TkXSCGgAdAB0AHAAOgAvAC8AdwB3AHcALgBhAG4AZAByAGUAdwByAG8AYgBiAC4AYwBvAG0ALgBhAHUALwA.&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.andrewrobb.com.au%2f>



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 23:47:53 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE TPP Trust that LOTS of Farmers in New Brunswick and
many Yankees, Icelanders and New Zealanders know exactly who I am EH
John Key. Birgitta Jonsdottir, Wayne Easter and Rob Nicholson?
To: t.groser@ministers.govt.nz, m.mccully@ministers.govt.nz,
t.mcclay@ministers.govt.nz, reception@liberal.pe.ca, birgittaj
<birgittaj@althingi.is>, jamie_macphail@hotmail.com, nichor
<nichor@parl.gc.ca>, MMcalvanah@ustr.eop.gov,
Andrew.Robb.MP@aph.gov.au, "peter.mackay"
<peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca>, "rob.moore.a1" <rob.moore.a1@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
sally.gomery@nortonrosefulbright.com, correspondence@ustr.eop.gov,
Timothy_Reif@ustr.eop.gov, Michael_Froman@ustr.eop.gov,
public.div@asean.org, sflynn@wcl.american.edu

https://www.whitehouse.gov/open/around/eop/ustr

https://ustr.gov/about-us/biographies-key-officials/timothy-reif-general-counsel

http://www.international.gc.ca/media/aff/photos/2012/07/16b.aspx?lang=eng

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/feds-fail-to-have-henk-tepper-court-case-tossed-1.2638251

http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html

http://infojustice.org/archives/34482

http://www.liberal.ca/candidates/wayne-easter/

Riding President
Jamie MacPhail
jamie_macphail@hotmail.com
reception@liberal.pe.ca


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "J Key (MIN)" <J.Key@ministers.govt.nz>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 01:38:56 +0000
Subject: Thank you for your email
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

On behalf of the Prime Minister, Rt Hon John Key, thank you for your email.

Please note that although email increases the speed of delivery, it
may not be possible to provide you with the rapid response users of
email may anticipate.

The fact that you have taken the time to write is appreciated.  You
can be assured that your views will be noted.


Yours sincerely
The Office of the Prime Minister


________________________________




---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 21:38:42 -0400
Subject: RE TPP Trust that LOTS of Dairy Farmers in New Brunswick and
many Yankee, Icelanders and New Zealanders know exactly who I am EH
John Key. Birgitta Jonsdottir, Wayne Easter and Rob Nicholson?
To: J.Key@ministers.govt.nz
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

https://www.facebook.com/birgitta.jonsdottir.english

Birgitta Jonsdottir
September 23 at 10:52am ·

Transparency Tim: show us the text
The TPP Internet Censorship Plan is coming We need you to tell your
Trade Minister today: don't let the Trans-Pacific Partnership destroy
our laws and censor the Internet.
stopthesecrecy.net
Like   Comment   Share

    Most Recent
    Paul Billingham, Marianne Hoynes, Birgitta Jonsdottir and 36
others like this.
    27 shares
    Comments
        Gary Bonn

Gary Bonn Thank you Birgitta Jonsdottir
1 · September 24 at 5:30am

http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/05/yo-birgitta-who-is-more-of-crook-julian.html

From: Birgitta Jonsdottir
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:14:02 +0000
Subject: Re: Bon Soir Birgitta according to my records this is the
first email I ever sent you
To: David Amos

dear Dave
i have got your email and will read through the links as soon as i
find some time keep up the good fight in the meantime

thank you for bearing with me
i am literary drowning in requests to look into all sorts of matters
and at the same time working 150% work at the parliament and the
creation of a political movement and being a responsible parent:) plus
all the matters in relation to immi

with oceans of joy
birgitta

Better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are not.

Andre Gide

Birgitta Jonsdottir
Birkimelur 8, 107 Reykjavik, Iceland, tel: 354 692 8884
http://this.is/birgittahttp://joyb.blogspot.com -
http://www.facebook.com/birgitta.jonsdottir

>>> From: "Julian Assange)" editor@wikileaks.org
>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 3:15 PM
>>> Subject: Al Jazeera on Iceland's plan for a press safe haven
>>>
>>> FYI: Al-Jazeera's take on Iceland's proposed media safe haven
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbGiPjIE1pE
>>>
>>> More info http://immi.is/
>>>
>>> Julian Assange Editor WikiLeaks http://wikileaks.org/
>>>
>>> From: "David Amos" david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>> To: "Julian Assange)" editor@wikileaks.org
>>> Cc: "Dan Fitzgerald" danf@danf.net; "Byrne. G" Byrne.G@parl.gc.ca
>>> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:35 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Al Jazeera on Iceland's new plan Thanx Here is
>>> something about Iceland and Banksters Al Jazeera would enjoy
>>>
>>> Checkout this old pdf file from 2005 at about page two or three
>>>
>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/4304560/Speaker-Iceland-etc
>>>
>>> Then read on and chuckle
>>>
>>> From: postur@fjr.stjr.is
>>> Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009
>>> Subject: Re: RE: Iceland and Bankers etc I must ask the obvious
>>> question. Why have you people ignored me for three years?
>>> To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Dear David Amos
>>>
>>> Unfortunately there has been a considerable delay in responding to
>>> incoming letters due to heavy workload and many inquiries to our
>>> office.
>>>
>>> We appreciate the issue raised in your letter. We have set up a web
>>> site www.iceland.org where we have gathered various practical
>>> information regarding the economic crisis in Iceland.
>>>
>>> Greetings from the Ministry of Finance.
>>>
>>> Tilvísun í mál: FJR08100024
>>>
>>> From: postur@for.stjr.is
>>> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008
>>> Subject: Regarding your enquiry to the Prime Ministry of Iceland
>>> To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>
>>> Your enquiry has been received by the Prime Ministry of Iceland and
>>> waits attendance.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008
>>> Subject: I just called to remind the Speaker, the Bankers and the
>>> Icelanders that I still exist EH Mrs Mrechant, Bob Rae and Iggy?
>>> To: Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca, sjs@althingi.is, emb.ottawa@mfa.is,
>>> rmellish@pattersonlaw.ca, irisbirgisdottir@yahoo.ca,
>>> marie@mariemorneau.com, dfranklin@franklinlegal.com,
>>> egilla@althingi.is, william.turner@exsultate.ca
>>> Cc: Rae.B@parl.gc.ca, Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca, lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca,
>>> merchp@sen.parl.gc.ca, coolsa@sen.parl.gc.ca, olived@sen.parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> All of you should review the documents and CD that came with this
>>> letter ASAP EH?
>>>
>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
>>>
>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/4304560/Speaker-Iceland-etc
>>>
>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/5352095/Tony-Merchant-and-Yankees
>>>
>>> Perhaps Geir Haarde and Steingrimur Sigfusson should call me back
>>>
>>> Veritas Vincit
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>
>>> The Reykjavík Grapevine
>>> Hafnarstræti 15
>>> 101 Reykjavík
>>> Iceland
>>> grapevine@grapevine.is
>>> +354-540-3600
>>
>>



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 21:21:42 -0400
Subject: FWD LOTS of Dairy Farmers in New Brunswick know exactly who I
am ask Wayne Easter why EH Rob Moore?
To: nbmilk@nbmilk.org, weekesj@bennettjones.com,
mclellana@bennettjones.com, votefast2015@gmail.com,
info@karenmccrimmon.ca, info@marthahallfindlay.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

https://mobile.twitter.com/wayneeaster

Wayne Easter  @WayneEaster  15h
Heartwarming y'day on campaign trail as several non-farm households
stated "concerned for dairy farmers"(due 2 TPP)Support 4 fellow citizens

http://wayneeaster.parl.liberal.ca/media-reports/media-releases/conservative-government-must-be-transparent-with-canadians-during-tpp-talks/

Conservative Government Must be Transparent with Canadians during TPP Talks

Posted on July 16, 2012

CHARLOTTETOWN— Liberal International Trade critic Wayne Easter made
the following statement today on Canada’s Trans-Pacific Partnership
(TPP) negotiations:

“According to a recent report, the US will be seeking ‘new market
access’ from Canada in the TPP negotiations. The report noted that a
major component of negotiations would be Canada’s supply management
system.

It is imperative that this Conservative government be completely
transparent on their TPP negotiations, especially in regards to what
Canada is conceding in order to be accepted into this partnership.
Canadian dairy and poultry producers depend on the supply management
system, just as Canadian consumers rely on its stable pricing, and
they all deserve assurance that their livelihoods and food safety will
not be compromised in these negotiations.”



http://www.ctvnews.ca/business/montreal-dairy-company-saputo-says-it-can-adapt-to-any-tpp-deal-1.2501466

"Saputo said some dairy farmers have good reason to be worried if
there are dramatic changes to Canada's protective supply management
system, as demanded by some of the 12 countries involved in
negotiating the trade deal. But he said other farmers are efficient,
can compete with anybody in the world and flourish in an unregulated
system.

The abolition of Canada's dairy supply management system would
threaten 4,500 to 6,000 farms and up to 24,000 direct jobs across the
country, according to a study released last week commissioned by dairy
co-operative and Saputo rival Agropur.

Up to 40 per cent of Canada's milk production would be at risk, said
the 56-page report from Boston Consulting Group."

http://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/tpp-trade-deal-is-now-close-and-for-canada-the-last-big-issue-is-dairy-1.2592586

"Fast used more guarded language on dairy. Of that, he said: "There's
still lots of work to be done."

The Canadian government faces domestic pressure from dairy-producing
provinces, who are not at the negotiating table but have provincial
representatives in Atlanta pushing against any opening to foreign milk
and cheese.

Canada isn't the only country with domestic pressure: the American
delegation has received a public letter from influential lawmakers
urging it to walk away unless it can secure certain gains for American
businesses.

But the biggest U.S. business lobby is urging a deal now.

It says the decade-long TPP project could be destroyed by domestic
politics if it doesn't happen immediately, with elections in Canada,
then the U.S., Japan and Peru next year and governments under pressure
to protect individual sectors.

"If we miss this opportunity I believe we may lose it forever," said
Tami Overby, vice-president at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

"We have the Canadian election. No one knows what that outcome's going
to be. We also get closer to the U.S. 2016 (presidential race) -- that
gets harder. So from my perspective nothing gets better. But the risk
increases, and in some cases quite significantly as time goes by."

As if to underscore her point, NDP Leader Tom Mulcair announced Friday
that he wouldn't consider himself bound to ratify any deal reached
during the election campaign.

Overby encouraged all countries to put some of the proverbial water in
their wine.

For Canada, that wine comes with a little more foreign cheese.

She said New Zealand hasn't asked for much. But it helped spearhead
the TPP project years ago, with its one major demand being access to
dairy markets.

Other Canadian industries are thrilled at the prospect of a deal.

The head of Canada's pro-free-market agriculture group said he expects
a nine-per-cent increase in canola exports alone, with big gains for
other industries including pork, beef and barley.

"We're extremely optimistic for our sector," said Brian Innes of the
Canadian Agri-Food Trade Alliance, and vice-president of the Canola
Council.

"We face significant trade barriers, this is the most ambitious deal
in decades, and it could have a major impact on our ability to export."


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:15:04 -0400
Subject: RE FATCA ATTN Pierre-Luc.Dusseault I just called and left a
message for you
To: Pierre-Luc.Dusseault@parl.gc.ca, david <david@lutz.nb.ca>,
"Diane.Lebouthillier" <Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc.ca>,
"mark.vespucci" <mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
curtis <curtis@marinerpartners.com>, "rick.hancox"
<rick.hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, djtjr
<djtjr@trumporg.com>, mcohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>,
elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, "ht.lacroix" <ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>,
"hon.melanie.joly" <hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca>

Trust that Trump, CBC and everybody else knows that I speak and act
Pro Se particularly when dealing with the Evil Tax Man

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/taxes-internal-revenue-service-fatca-united-states-1.3954789?__vfz=profile_comment%3D7320800006927


Transfer of Canadian banking records to U.S. tax agency doubled last
year Documents for thousands of Canadian residents transferred under
controversial FATCA legislation

By Elizabeth Thompson, CBC News Posted: Jan 29, 2017 5:00 AM ET

Banking records of more than 315,000 Canadian residents were turned
over to the U.S. Internal Revenue Service last year under a
controversial information sharing deal, CBC News has learned.

That is double the number transferred in the deal's first year.

The Canada Revenue Agency transmitted 315,160 banking records to the
IRS on Sept. 28, 2016 — a 104 per cent increase over the 154,667
records the agency sent in September 2015.

Lisa Damien, spokeswoman for the CRA, attributed the increase to the
fact it was the second year for the Canada-U.S. information sharing
deal that was sparked by the U.S. Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act
(FATCA).

"The exchange in September 2015 was based on accounts identified by
financial institutions at the time," she said. "The number of reported
accounts was expected to increase in 2016, because the financial
institutions have had more time to complete their due diligence and
identify other reportable accounts."


Trudeau Nuclear Summit 20160331

Prior to coming to power, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau opposed the
agreement to share banking records of Canadian residents with the IRS.
He has since changed his position. (Sean Kilpatrick/Canadian Press)

The transmission of banking records of Canadian residents is the
result of an agreement worked out in 2014 between Canada and the U.S.
after the American government adopted FATCA. The U.S. tax compliance
act requires financial institutions around the world to reveal
information about bank accounts in a bid to crack down on tax evasion
by U.S. taxpayers with foreign accounts.


Dual citizens, long-term visitors affected

The deal requires financial institutions to share the banking records
of those considered to be "U.S. persons" for tax purposes — regardless
of whether they are U.S. citizens.

Among the people who can be considered by the IRS as "U.S. persons"
are Canadians born in the U.S., dual citizens or even those who spend
more than a certain number of days in the United States each year.

Former prime minister Stephen Harper's government argued that given
the penalties the U.S. was threatening to impose, it had no choice but
to negotiate the information sharing deal. The former government said
it was able to exempt some types of accounts from the information
transfer.


CRA

The Canada Revenue Agency transfers banking records of people believed
to be 'U.S. persons' to the IRS. (Sean Kilpatrick/Canadian Press)

The Canada Revenue Agency triggered controversy after it transferred
the first batch of Canadian banking records to the IRS in September
2015 in the midst of the election campaign, without waiting for an
assessment by Canada's privacy commissioner or the outcome of a legal
challenge to the agreement's constitutionality.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Treasury Board President Scott Brison
and Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale have dropped calls to scrap
the deal, which they had made before the Liberals came to power.
Watchdog wants proactive notification

Privacy Commissioner Daniel Therrien has raised concerns about the
information sharing, questioning whether financial institutions are
reporting more accounts than necessary. Under the agreement, financial
institutions only have to report accounts belonging to those believed
to be U.S. persons if they contain more than $50,000.

Therrien has also suggested the CRA proactively notify individuals
that their financial records had been shared with the IRS. However,
the CRA has been reluctant to agree to Therrien's suggestion.


Racial Profiling 20160107

Privacy Commissioner Daniel Therrien has questioned whether the CRA is
transmitting more banking records to the IRS than is necessary.
(Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)

NDP revenue critic Pierre-Luc Dusseault said the increase in the
number of files transferred was "surprising," and he questioned
whether financial institutions are only sharing records of accounts
worth more than $50,000.

"I don't see how there would be 150,000 more accounts reportable to
the IRS in one year. It is something I will look into."

Dusseault said the CRA should notify every Canadian resident whose
banking records are shared with the IRS.

Lynne Swanson, of the Alliance for the Defence of Canadian
Sovereignty, which is challenging the information sharing agreement in
Federal Court, said she has no idea why the number of banking records
shared with the IRS doubled.


Youngest MP 20110519

NDP revenue critic Pierre-Luc Dusseault says the CRA should notify
every Canadian resident whose banking records are shared with the IRS.
(Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)

"It still seems low in comparison to the number of Canadians that are
affected by this," she said. "It is estimated that a million Canadians
are affected by this."


Hopes for repeal

Swanson hopes that U.S. President Donald Trump, or Congress — which is
now controlled by the Republican Party — will scrap FATCA. The
Republican platform pledged to do away with the information collecting
legislation.

"FATCA not only allows 'unreasonable search and seizures' but also
threatens the ability of overseas Americans to lead normal lives," the
platform reads. "We call for its repeal and for a change to
residency-based taxation for U.S. citizens overseas."

Swanson's group is also hoping the Federal Court of Canada will
intervene, although a date has not yet been set for a hearing.

"A foreign government is essentially telling the Canadian government
how Canadian citizens and Canadian residents should be treated. It is
a violation of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms."

Elizabeth Thompson can be reached at elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca

 

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html

 

Sunday, 19 November 2017


Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before The Supreme Court


https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do

Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Amos v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2017-10-30
Neutral citation
2017 FCA 213
File numbers
A-48-16
Date: 20171030
Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
THE COURT


Date: 20171030
Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
I.                    Introduction
[1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos) filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan (Claim at para. 96).
[2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious, and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the Prothontary’s Order).
[3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr. Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr. Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
[4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016. As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s cross-appeal.
II.                 Preliminary Matter
[5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal. This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with several judges but did not name those judges.
[6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. F-7:
5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal.
[…]
5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
[…]
5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les juges de la Cour fédérale.
[7]               However, these subsections only provide that the judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this section.
[8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en matière civile et pénale.
4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en matière civile et pénale.
[9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that appeal book.
[10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a conflict in any matter related to him. 
[11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court. Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
[12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that such judge had a conflict.
[13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr. Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he was a member of such firm.
[14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb, focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
[15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street, Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
[16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable apprehension of bias:
60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the reasonable apprehension of bias:
… the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person, viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
[17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v. Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R. (4th) 193).
[18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v. Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement, as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J. in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.), for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge. His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept, that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
            To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making, or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with his former firm for a considerable period of time.
32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage. In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving events from over a decade ago.
(emphasis added)
[19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice Webb hearing this appeal.
[20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R. (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
[21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4 F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr. Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
[22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD. He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
[23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him to recuse himself.
[24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
[25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr. Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time, both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry, begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr. Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
III.               Issue
[26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
IV.              Analysis 

A.                 Standard of Review
[27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215, 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235 [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
[28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to interfere. 
B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the Prothonotary’s Order?
[29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006 in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
(…)
21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance. A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
[footnotes omitted].
[30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at para. 27).
[31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada, 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
[13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
(Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
[32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in public office because the actors, who barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
[33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321 D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
…When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”. “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald, conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse of process…
To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
(at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
[34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
[35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons, these allegations are not particularized and are directed against non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such, the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action.
[36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend. The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
V.                 Conclusion
[37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment, dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety without leave to amend.
"Wyman W. Webb"
J.A.
"David G. Near"
J.A.
"Mary J.L. Gleason"
J.A.


FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
DOCKET:
A-48-16
STYLE OF CAUSE:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
PLACE OF HEARING:
Fredericton,
New Brunswick
DATE OF HEARING:
May 24, 2017
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
DATED:
October 30, 2017




APPEARANCES:
David Raymond Amos
For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
(on his own behalf)
Jan Jensen
For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Nathalie G. Drouin
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 10:20:01 -0400
Subject: Attn James Turk RE Free Expression I believe spoke before
To: james.turk@ryerson.ca
Cc: David Amos

https://theconversation.com/free-expression-at-universities-gagged-by-anti-trump-backlash-83079

Free expression at universities gagged by anti-Trump backlash
August 28, 2017 7.00pm EDT
Protesters demonstrate on the University of Washington campus where
far-right commentator Milo Yiannopoulos was giving a speech in Seattle
on the same day Donald Trump was sworn in as president. (AP Photo/Ted
S. Warren)

Author
James Turk
Director, Centre for Free Expression & Distinguished Visiting
Professor, Ryerson University

Disclosure statement
James Turk does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive
funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this
article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond the
academic appointment above.

Office: RCC 155
Phone: 416-979-5000 x6396
Email: james.turk@ryerson.ca

Cell 613 277 0488


https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/status/913566147215335425


Replying to and
CBC says "Suppressing unwanted views never works" EH? Survey Says???

 http://www.cbc.ca/radio/ideas/don-t-shoot-the-messenger-the-value-of-whistleblowing-1.4090385

 A protester holds a sign that reads "Make Fascists Afraid Again!" during a demonstration on Jan. 20, 2017 at the University of Washington campus, where far-right commentator Milo Yiannopoulos was giving a speech.

Don't shoot the messenger: The value of whistleblowing

Recorded at Ryerson University's Centre for Free Expression, Paul Kennedy hosts a panel on why whistleblowers are vital to the public interest...and how their exposure of wrongdoing can ultimately be helpful,



 ---------- Original message ----------
From: "Joly, Mélanie (PCH)" hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 21:39:45 +0000
Subject: Accusé de réception / Acknowledge Receipt
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com

Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable Mélanie Joly, ministre du Patrimoine canadien.

La ministre est toujours heureuse de prendre connaissance des commentaires de Canadiens sur des questions d'importance pour eux. Votre courriel sera lu avec soin.
Si votre courriel porte sur une demande de rencontre ou une invitation à une activité particulière, nous tenons à vous assurer que votre demande a été notée et qu'elle recevra toute l'attention voulue.

**********************

Thank you for writing to the Honourable Mélanie Joly, Minister of Canadian Heritage.

The Minister is always pleased to hear the comments of Canadians on subjects of importance to them. Your email will be read with care.
If your email relates to a meeting request or an invitation to a specific event, please be assured that your request has been noted and will be given every consideration.

The Centre for Free Expression at Ryerson University
Rogers Communications Centre
80 Gould Street
Toronto, Ontario
cfe@ryerson.ca
(416) 979-5000, ext. 6396

September 10, 2017

Controversies about free speech have become increasingly common in universities in Canada and the United States. In an interview with CBC’s Michael Enright, the Centre for Free Expression’s Director James Turk explores the difficult issues that are proving so divisive, suggesting that attempts to suppress speech undermines the work of the university and the possibilities for a vibrant democracy, while putting minorities and marginalized peoples at risk.

Click on this link (link is external) to listen to the interview.


http://www.cbc.ca/radio/thesundayedition/the-sunday-edition-september-10-2017-1.4280530/suppressing-unwanted-views-never-works-james-turk-on-campus-free-speech-debates-1.4280784


Sunday September 10, 2017

Suppressing unwanted views never works: James Turk on campus free speech debates

A protester holds a sign that reads "Make Fascists Afraid Again!" during a demonstration on Jan. 20, 2017 at the University of Washington campus, where far-right commentator Milo Yiannopoulos was giving a speech.
A protester holds a sign that reads "Make Fascists Afraid Again!" during a demonstration on Jan. 20, 2017 at the University of Washington campus, where far-right commentator Milo Yiannopoulos was giving a speech. (The Associated Press)

"We can never be sure that the opinion we are endeavouring to stifle is a false opinion; and if we were sure, stifling it would be an evil still." John Stuart Mill wrote those words in his polemic, On Liberty. It was published in 1859.

In the intervening century-and-a-half or so, we have accepted freedom of expression as a bedrock principle of living in a liberal democracy. In Canada, it is enshrined in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

We have also decided to draw a line. The same Charter states that our right to free expression is subject to "reasonable limits prescribed by law." That includes Criminal Code provisions against the incitement or promotion of hatred.

However, it is not just the courts that are drawing a line between free speech and hate speech. Activists who see certain views as repugnant successfully have shut down public events and speeches.

The most heated controversies have centred on the institutions we view as essential to fostering public discussion and debate — our universities.

James Turk
Jim Turk, Director of the Centre for Free Expression and a Distinguished Visiting Professor at Ryerson University

The conservative social commentator Anne Coulter cancelled a speech at the University of Ottawa because organizers decided it wasn't safe for her to speak.

The University of Calgary cancelled the screening of a documentary film that promotes men's rights and bashes feminism.

And recently, Ryerson University in Toronto cancelled a panel discussion called, ironically, "The Stifling of Free Speech on University Campuses." University administrators said they could not provide the security necessary to ensure public safety.

James Turk wrote a trenchant editorial in opposition to the Ryerson decision. He is the university's Director of the Centre for Free Expression, and a Distinguished Visiting Professor. For 16 years, he served as the Executive Director of the Canadian Association of University Teachers.
Free speech is about protecting speech you abhor, so your speech may be heard when others abhor what you have to say. - James Turk

6 Comments 


David Raymond Amos
Content disabled.
David Raymond Amos
Good for Mr Turk for speaking up. His words caused me to do a little survey about this article within Twitter and my blog.

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/09/cbc-says-suppressing-unwanted-views.html

If the Crown Corp CBC truly cared about Free Speech why did it ignore its non partisan mandate and deny that I ran for public office fives? I predicted CBC would remain true to course within my lawsuit while I was suing the Crown and seeking a seat in the 42nd Parliament at the same time. The election is long over but I am still arguing the Crown in Federal Court to this very day. Have a look for yourself.

CBC's work

Fundy Royal campaign targets middle class with focus on jobs
Fundy Royal voters have elected Conservatives all but 1 time in 28 elections over 101 years
CBC News Posted: Oct 17, 2015 6:00 AM AT

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276

Roger's work
Fundy Royal, New Brunswick Debate – Federal Elections 2015 - The Local Campaign, Rogers TV
Published on Oct 1, 2015

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cFOKT6TlSE

My work

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html

FYI I called Mr Turk"s cell today and left him a voicemail then sent him and several others an email after I had a little talk with an ex cop who claims to care about whistleblowers while working for crooked Beancounters.

The real question is will CBC bock or erase this comment of mine like they often do?





 ---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 21:39:45 +0000
Subject: RE: Sandy Boucher I wish that you had trusted me today
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos commentaires.


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 15:50:36 -0400
Subject: Sandy Boucher I wish that you had trusted me today
To: Sandy.Boucher@ca.gt.com, jacqueline.maarse@ca.gt.com, stephen.davidson@saintjohn.ca, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca, Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, allan.cutler@canadians4accountability.org, david@fairwhistleblower.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, cfe@ryerson.ca, Mary.Lynk@cbc.ca, Ideas.Proposals@cbc.ca, ht.lacroix@cbc.ca, hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca, Bill.Morneau@canada.ca

After all your lawyers and your friend David Hutton and their pals in
the the CBC, the RCMP and the FBI cannot deny that I am the guy who
cannot afford to trust anyone

 https://cfe.ryerson.ca/people/sandy-boucher









Sandy Boucher


Senior Fellow

Corporate Investigator
Grant Thornton LLP Advisory Services
Sandy Boucher is a seasoned investigator with over 33 years of experience in both the public and private sectors.  Starting his career with the Royal Hong Kong Police, where he worked for 12 ½  years attaining the rank of Superintendent, Sandy  specialized in Asian organized crime, narcotics and money laundering investigations.  During his time with the force, Sandy received both Commissioners and Commanding Officer’s commendations for his work, as well as commendations from eight overseas police forces;  He managed and conducted a broad range of high level investigations including a number which involved corruption during this period.

He came to Canada and the private sector in 1995, and specializes in fraud and corruption investigations, background due diligence enquiries, asset tracing and recovery. Sandy now works on detecting and preventing fraud and corruption and divides his time between investigating such cases and advising organizations on how to prevent them from occurring.  He has led and conducted a wide range of investigations including a number of high level corruption probes, and has testified around the globe in both civil & criminal courts.  Since 2009, he was worked in the forensic group of Grant Thornton LLP where he heads the national investigative research, and anti-corruption practices. 
Sandy has worked with many whistleblowers and has managed a number of complex investigations stemming from whistleblower complaints during his career.  He is also on the Grant Thornton Confidential Anonymous Reporting for Employees (CARE) team.  In 2015, Sandy helped to initiate the Canadian Standards Authority project to develop a whistleblower systems standard.  As Co-Convenor of the 25 person working group, he helped lead the development of the express document; “Whistleblower Systems - A Guideline”, that was published in February 2016. Sandy is a frequent speaker on whistleblower related issues and is working to raise awareness, both of the value of whistleblowers, as well as the retaliation they often suffer for speaking up.  He also continues to work with whistleblowers in his regular practice and by offering a sympathetic ear to those who approach him.


http://www.cbc.ca/radio/ideas/don-t-shoot-the-messenger-the-value-of-whistleblowing-1.4090385


Tuesday September 26, 2017

Don't shoot the messenger: The value of whistleblowing


Protestors lend support as David House, a founding member of the Bradley Manning Support Network, testifies in US Federal Courthouse in Arlington, Virginia, June 15, 2011, to testify before the Federal Grand Jury, regarding the investigation on WikiLeaks.
Protestors lend support as David House, a founding member of the Bradley Manning Support Network, testifies in US Federal Courthouse in Arlington, Virginia, June 15, 2011, to testify before the Federal Grand Jury, regarding the investigation on WikiLeaks. (PAUL J. RICHARDS/AFP/Getty Images) 


Recorded at Ryerson University's Centre for Free Expression, Paul Kennedy hosts a panel on why whistleblowers are vital to the public interest...and how their exposure of wrongdoing can ultimately be helpful, even to their workplace. Investigator Sandy Boucher, international expert Anna Myers, and Canadian advocate David Hutton join forces to explain why they believe whistleblowers should be heard and protected. **This episode originally aired April 28, 2017.

Ideas
Investigator Sandy Boucher tells the John Le Carré-like story of Brian McAdam, a Canadian diplomat who spoke out about links he saw between organized crime in Asia and the Canadian government in the 1990s.

00:00 00:59


When people are asked to name a whistleblower these days, they likely think of the headline-grabbing story of Edward Snowden. His leak of classified documents detailing widespread surveillance by the National Security Agency provoked global debate.


"I think in the U.S. system...it was always seen that a whistleblower is someone who goes outside to a journalist. For most individuals, that is the last port of call, rather than the first...People don't think about going to the journalist. So I think there's a lot of misconception...around whistleblowing." Anna Myers, Whistleblowing International Network


Whistleblower Panel at the Ryerson Centre for Free Expression
Paul Kennedy, left, with panellists Anna Myers, David Hutton, and Sandy Boucher at Ryerson's Centre for Free Expression in Toronto, March 2017 (Ange Holmes/Ryerson Centre for Free Expression)

In fact, the vast majority of whistleblowing occurs on a smaller scale — and far away from the media's gaze, and the public's knowledge. That can make the act of calling out fraud, corruption, and misbehaviour a risky business for workers who speak up. While they may not need to flee to Russia like Snowden, the repercussions can be personally and professionally devastating. That is true particularly when those in power decide to self-protectively circle their wagons and deliberately undermine the reputation of the employee who is speaking out. Still, according to our panel, most whistleblowers likely would do it all over again.

"From my perspective, a great many whistleblowers — perhaps the vast majority of them — get into trouble by doing what they see as their job… And most of them feel they don't have any choice about it, and many of them have no idea of how serious the consequences may be for them."  — David Hutton

Sandy Boucher, David Hutton, and Anna Myers collectively share decades of experience talking to whistleblowers from both the private and public sectors — from medical researchers to tree surgeons. Through whistleblower hotlines and meetings, they give them advice, and bear witness to what happens in the wake of people's disclosures.

That's what unites them in believing that whistleblowing keeps organizations, governments, and businesses ethical — and democracy healthy. That's also why they are calling for better protection for whistleblowers themselves — at home in Canada, and internationally. Specifically, they call for better government legislation and clearer policies, as well as investigative reporting that follows through.

There may need to be an attitude change on the employer level as well.  Whistleblowing, after all, is as an opportunity: it exposes a serious internal problem that can be investigated and curtailed at earlier stages, with less damage to all involved.

Guests in this episode:
  • Sandy Boucher is a fraud and corruption investigator, and Senior Manager with Grant Thornton LLP. He's also a former Superintendent with the Royal Hong Kong Police.
     
  • David Hutton is a longtime proponent of whistleblower protection in Canada, and the former Executive Director of FAIR -- the Federal Accountability Initiative for Reform.
Related websites:
**This episode was produced by Lisa Godfrey.

  
12 Comments

David Amos
David Amos
Go Figure why I save everything


Willa Wylde
Willa Wylde
Thank-you for this episode. I needed to hear this.


Myles Flaig
Myles Flaig
Thank you CBC and all the panelists.

We are getting down to the ultimate root cause of our current problems: No love in capitalism.

Love is the supreme ethic (Ravi Zacharais) Freedom is participation in power (Cicero) and my synthesis is therefore ""Love inspires freedom".
My thanks to Ralph Nader for teaching me what Cicero said.

We need Crown corporations and as many enterprises to become Worker Self Directed Enterprises per Richard D Wolff Ph.D economics. In other words, democratic workplaces

Now we are very fortunate to pledge our allegiance to the Queen of Canada who has encouraged the people of The Commonwealth in her Christmas message 2015 to be Love everywhere. This means reforming our elected governments, the first ministers and the corporations accordingly.

We the people need to embrace the "Two Row Wampum" based on "peace, equity and the power of the good minds". The Indigenous Peoples have a lot to teach us about democracy, gender harmony, and sustainable living respecting Mother Earth. Check out Oren Lyons and this website: http://www.digitalwampum.org

Chris Brown
Chris Brown
I wonder how CBC treats whistleblowers who might report unethical or damaging journalism.

Myles Flaig
Myles Flaig
@Chris Brown good question. I propose that we convert the CBC to a worker self directed enterprise (Richard D. Wolff) or, in other words, a democratic workplace.


Susan Macaulay
Susan Macaulay
I thoroughly enjoyed this episode, and I see many parallels between whistleblowing as an employee, which was the focus here, and whistleblowing from outside of an organization, which is my experience. I think it would be interesting to follow up with a program that focuses on people who advocate for various "causes" and the price they pay for doing so. 

In my case, as an advocate for better care for my mother who lived with dementia in a nursing home, I was threatened with being denied access to her, and multiple different strategies such as the ones discussed by the panelists were used to intimidate and silence me. My mother died in August 2016, and I continue to advocate for better eldercare, particularly for people who live with dementia. I told part of my story to a Senate committee earlier this year: http://myalzheimersstory.com/2017/02/08/what-i-said-to-the-senators/

I was interested to hear one of the panelists comment that he would think twice about whistleblowing if it would cause his family to suffer. This is precisely what prevents family members from advocating more vocally with respect to the care of loved ones "held hostage" by institutions. They fear the patient will get even worse treatment if they complain too loudly; the result is that the hidden neglect and abuse in long-term care continues. More here: http://myalzheimersstory.com/2016/11/23/3-more-reasons-family-and-friends-of-people-who-live-with-dementia-in-long-term-care-facilities-dont-report-abuse-and-neglect/

Myles Flaig
Myles Flaig
@Susan Macaulay Thank you for your efforts on behalf of Canadians. I saw your comment to the CBC Ideas program on whistleblowers. I propose that we convert as many Crown corporations and all healthcare enterprises to worker self directed enterprise (Richard D. Wolff Ph.D economics) or, in other words, a democratic workplace. All capitalist hierarchical cultures are unsafe for workers and the people they serve. WSDEs are something I am passionate about because of my own experiences in capitalism. I look forward to staying in touch.

Susan Macaulay
Susan Macaulay
@Myles Flaig thank you. You propose some interesting ideas.


Doug Barr
Doug Barr
Whistle blowers are a symptom of a sick society. It would be much more beneficial to have a panel discuss curing the disease, the conflict between the divisions of society that's killing humanity, rather than protecting whistle blowers. Among the benefits would be the death of democracy, the end of inequality, the disappearance of religions and so on... and the reappearance of unity. https://thelastwhy.ca/


Myles Flaig
Myles Flaig
@Doug Barr there is a book by economics professor Richard D. Wolff "Democracy at Work - the Cure for capitalism " and others http://www.rdwolff.com/books


 David Raymond Amos
 Content disabled.
David Raymond Amos


Edgar Schmidt
Edgar Schmidt
One of the panelists comments was that the media can help improve outcomes for the public and whistleblowers by doing follow-up stories, continuing to track issues, rather than doing drive-by stories. I agree. Persistence, continuing to explore and follow-up on issues is important.

David Raymond Amos
David Raymond Amos
@Edgar Schmidt If you wish to recall I called you and your lawyer and left messages after I studied your lawsuit and before I filed my own in Federal Court T-1557-15



Sandy Boucher
Advisory Services

Sector Focus: Charities and not-for-profit organizations, Construction
& real estate, Financial services, Mining, Private equity,
Professional services, Public administration

Service Focus: Forensic technology, Asset tracing, Transaction
advisory services, Corporate intelligence, Certification support
services, Intellectual property matters, Mergers and acquisitions,
Family law matters, Governance and standards compliance, Fraud
investigations, Security consulting and investigations, Insurance
claim losses, Security, Regulatory and anti-money laundering
consulting

Toronto, ON
E-mail • T 1-416-369-7027


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Maarse, Jacqueline" Jacqueline.Maarse@ca.gt.com
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 21:54:05 +0000
Subject: Your call today with Grant Thornton
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Dear Mr. Amos,

Further to your call with the 2 gentlemen in our Moncton office today,
we appreciate your interest in Grant Thornton.  We ask that you direct
any correspondence you may wish to send to my attention at the address
indicated below.  We will not be in a position to copy documents from
your computer and we ask that you do not attend at our offices for
that purpose.  As indicated in the call, communications relating to
ongoing litigation are dealt with by our General Counsel's Office and
our partners and staff are not able to engage with you on these
matters.

Regards,
Jacqueline Maarse

Jacqueline Maarse | General Counsel
Grant Thornton LLP
12th Floor | 50 Bay Street | Toronto | ON | M5J 2Z8

E Jacqueline.Maarse@ca.gt.com mailto:Jacqueline.Maarse@ca.gt.com | W
http://www.grantthornton.ca/

[cid:image001.jpg@01CF909B.B187EE80]
http://www.grantthornton.ca/
[cid:image002.jpg@01CF909B.B187EE80] http://www.greatplacetowork.ca/best-workplaces/best-workplaces-in-canada


Grant Thornton LLP is proud to be
recognized as one of Canada's best
workplaces for our sixth consecutive year!


________________________________
Disclaimer: This email is intended solely for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. Any review, dissemination, copying, printing or other use
of this email by persons or entities other than the addressee is
prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please contact
the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 16:43:22 -0400
Subject: Re: Information The Crown should have shared my files with
you before you contacted me
To: stephen.davidson@saintjohn.ca, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Cc: motomaniac333@gmail.com

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Justice Website JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Mr. Amos,
We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
not be responding to further emails on this matter.

Department of Justice


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
To: coi@gnb.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com

Good Day Sir

After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
to speak to one of your staff for the first time

Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.

These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
suggested that you study closely.

This is the docket in Federal Court

http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T

These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings

Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug

January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015

April 3rd, 2017

https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing


This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal

http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All


The only hearing thus far

May 24th, 2017

https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown


This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity

Date: 20151223

Docket: T-1557-15

Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015

PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell

BETWEEN:

DAVID RAYMOND AMOS

Plaintiff

and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Defendant

ORDER

(Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
December 14, 2015)

The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
in its entirety.

At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
(now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
he stated:

As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
You are your brother’s keeper.

Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
Police.

In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
[1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.


AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
is no order as to costs.

“B. Richard Bell”
Judge


Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.

 I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?

"FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html

83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
five years after he began his bragging:

January 13, 2015
This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate

December 8, 2014
Why Canada Stood Tall!

Friday, October 3, 2014
Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
Stupid Justin Trudeau?


Vertias Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Kulik, John" john.kulik@mcinnescooper.com
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 17:37:49 +0000
Subject: McInnes Cooper
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com

Dear Mr. Amos:

I am General Counsel for McInnes Cooper. If you need to communicate
with our firm, please do so through me.

Thank you.

John Kulik
[McInnes Cooper]

John Kulik Q.C.
Partner & General Counsel
McInnes Cooper

tel +1 (902) 444 8571 | fax +1 (902) 425 6350

1969 Upper Water Street
Suite 1300
Purdy's Wharf Tower II Halifax, NS, B3J 2V1

asst Cathy Ohlhausen | +1 (902) 455 8215



Notice This communication, including any attachments, is confidential
and may be protected by solicitor/client privilege. It is intended
only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by e-mail or
telephone at McInnes Cooper's expense. Avis Les informations contenues
dans ce courriel, y compris toute(s) pièce(s) jointe(s), sont
confidentielles et peuvent faire l'objet d'un privilège avocat-client.
Les informations sont dirigées au(x) destinataire(s) seulement. Si
vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur
par courriel ou par téléphone, aux frais de McInnes Cooper.



On 8/3/17, David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com wrote:

If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
 Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I musta sk
them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY

What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball cards?

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Finance Public / Finance Publique (FIN)"
fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:05:00 +0000
Subject: RE: Yo President Trump RE the Federal Court of Canada File No
T-1557-15 lets see how the media people do with news that is NOT FAKE
To: David Amos

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.

http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly2006

http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html

http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139

https://archive.org/details/WiretapTape143

http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc


FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
Senator Arlen Specter
United States Senate
Committee on the Judiciary
224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Mr. Specter:

I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that
these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact
with you about this previously.

Very truly yours,
Barry A. Bachrach
Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "MacKay, Peter" Peter.MacKay@bakermckenzie.com
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 14:39:17 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Minister Jean-Yves.Duclos Once again you
are welcome Now how about the RCMP, the LIEbranos and all the other
parliamentarians start acting with some semblance of Integrity after
all these years?
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com

Thank you for your email.  I am currently out of the office attending
meetings and have limited access to email and voicemail.  If your
matter is urgent, or if you require assistance, please contact my
assistant, Nicole Bruni at nicole.bruni@bakermckenzie.com or at (416)
865-3861.


This message may contain confidential and privileged information. If
it has been sent to you in error, please reply to advise the sender of
the error and then immediately delete this message.  Please visit
www.bakermckenzie.com/disclaimers for other important information
concerning this message.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:51:14 -0400
Subject: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump I
just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
does he lie to me after all this time???
To: president@whitehouse.gov, mdcohen212@gmail.com, pm@pm.gc.ca, Pierre-Luc.Dusseault@parl.gc.ca, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, Jean-Yves.Duclos@parl.gc.ca,
B.English@ministers.govt.nz, Malcolm.Turnbull.MP@aph.gov.au,
pminvites@pmc.gov.au, mayt@parliament.uk, press@bankofengland.co.uk, Andrew.Bailey@fca.org.uk, fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca, newsroom@globeandmail.ca, lionel@lionelmedia.com
CNN.Viewer.Communications.Management@cnn.com, news-tips@nytimes.com, Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, justin.ling@vice.com, elizabeththompson@ipolitics.ca, djtjr@trumporg.com,
Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, postur@for.is, stephen.kimber@ukings.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com

---------- Original message ----------
From: Michael Cohen mcohen@trumporg.com
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:15:14 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA ATTN Pierre-Luc.Dusseault I just
called and left a message for you
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
directed to 646-853-0114.
________________________________
This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its
affiliates.Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an
electronic signature under applicable law.




On 9/22/17, David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com wrote:

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 20:45:15 -0400
> Subject: Attn Robert David Steele FYI Hillary Clinton and tainted
> blood killed more Canadians than 911 killed Yankees I called your cell
> (571 748 9749) from Nova Scotia (902 800 0369) after I listened to you
> talk to Richie Allen
> To: robert.david.steele.vivas@gmail.com, richie@richieallen.co.uk,
> pfeely@unionleader.com, inspector.general@usdoj.gov, Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov,
> washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Peter.Edge@dhs.gov, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, James.Comey@ic.fbi.gov,
> rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca, Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca
>
> Ask the very corrupt and very evil ex RCMP dudes Rod Knecht and Gilles
> Moreau about the cover up of tainted blood for the benefit of the
> Clintons and their Canadian cohorts.
>
>
>
> FYI Enjoy some of my work against FEDS
>
> Saturday, 22 June 2013
> I must tell all why I am astounded and delighted that Prez Obama would
> appoint the crook James Comey of all people to be the boss of the FBI
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/06/i-must-tell-all-why-i-am-astounded-and.html
>
> "It's all about Lying" For years I often qouted Comey's bullshit
> statement about the Martha Stewart matter because Comey was the
> biggest liar of them all.
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/10/martha-stewart-and-me.html
>
> Just so ya know as you look at the picture within PDF file hereto
> attached of me teasing Ashcroft you all know Comey and every US
> Attorney and a host of others in the USA received exactly the same
> material that their former bosses did at about the same point in time
> in 2003. Everybody and his dog I received many answers LONG BEFORE the
> VERY corrupt lawyers Spitzer and Cutler and all the others testified
> before the Senate Banking Committee in November of 2003 about Putnum
> Investments and I stuck my nose into the Martha Stewart matter just
> for sshits and giggles.
>
> In one pdf file alone that can be easily found all over the Internet
> for years anyone can find some of letters to Ashcroft the US Attornies
> Whitey Bulger's family lawyers, Mueller as the boss of the FBI and
> some the evil work of Ashcroft's law firm partner Michael Sullivan and
> Mueler's old buddy Judge Sterns
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:23:24 -0300
> Subject: ATTN FBI Special Agent Richard Deslauriers Have you talked to
> your buddies Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly about the wiretap tapes YET?
> To: boston@ic.fbi.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, > Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov,
> us.marshals@usdoj.gov, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov,
> jcarney@carneybassil.com, bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, birgittaj@althingi.is,
> shmurphy@globe.com,  redicecreations@gmail.com
>
> FBI Boston
> One Center Plaza
> Suite 600
> Boston, MA 02108
> Phone: (617) 742-5533
> Fax: (617) 223-6327
> E-mail: Boston@ic.fbi.gov
>
> Hours
> Although we operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, our normal
> "walk-in" business hours are from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
> through Friday. If you need to speak with a FBI representative at any
> time other than during normal business hours, please telephone our
> office at (617) 742-5533.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300
> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is
> finally underway now correct? What the hell do I do with the wiretap
> tapes Sell them on Ebay?
> To: Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov,
> Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney@carneybassil.com,
> bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, wolfheartlodge@live.com,
> jonathan.albano@bingham.com, shmurphy@globe.com, mvalencia@globe.com
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
> PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov, rounappletree@aol.com
>
> http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/06/05/james-whitey-bulger-jury-selection-process-enters-second-day/KjS80ofyMMM5IkByK74bkK/story.html
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>
> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask
> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>
> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
> cards?
>
> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly2006
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>
> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>
> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>
> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
> Senator Arlen Specter
> United States Senate
> Committee on the Judiciary
> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
> Washington, DC 20510
>
> Dear Mr. Specter:
>
> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
> raised in the attached letter.
>
> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>
> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>
> Very truly yours,
> Barry A. Bachrach
> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>
>
> Obviously i checked some of your work with FEDS. Once a Fed always a Fed
> EH?
>
> MEMORANDUM FOR VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF
> AMERICA  SECRETARY OF STATE
> SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
> DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
> ADMINISTRATOR, US AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
>
> SUBJECT: Supporting the President’s Interest in 2015 Defense,
> Diplomacy, and Development Innovation – the Open Source (Technologies)
> Agency, Digital Deserts, & Global Stabilization
>
> Inspired by the Secretary of Defense and his 11 September 2015
> internal call for ideas related to the convergence of technological
> innovation with defense, diplomacy, and development objectives, an
> Open Source (Technologies) Agency is proposed. This agency, twice
> discussed during the past fifteen years within the Office of
> Management and Budget (OMB) (in an earlier information-focused
> incarnation), is now proposed as a comprehensive innovation engine
> that addresses nine distinct open source technology groups itemized
> below:
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Póstur FOR postur@for.is
> Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 23:35:10 +0000
> Subject: Re: Fwd: David Eby's sneaky question I am HOMELESS Thus I
> have no MLA whatsoever nor an MP or Congressman willing speak for me
> or to me for that matter.
> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
>
> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið  / Your request has been received
>
> Kveðja / Best regards
> Forsætisráðuneytið  / Prime Minister's Office
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Póstur IRR postur@irr.is
> Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 23:35:14 +0000
> Subject: Re: Fwd: David Eby's sneaky question I am HOMELESS Thus I
> have no MLA whatsoever nor an MP or Congressman willing speak for me
> or to me for that matter.
> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
>
> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received.
>
> Kveðja / Best regards
> Innanríkisráðuneytið / Ministry of the Interior
>
> On 7/23/16, David Amos wrote:
>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 21:55:29 -0400
>> Subject: Fwd: David Eby's sneaky question I am HOMELESS Thus I have no
>> MLA whatsoever nor an MP or Congressman willing speak for me or to me
>> for that matter.
>> To: david.eby.mla@leg.bc.ca, premier@gov.ab.ca, gail.thomsen@gov.ab.ca,
>> philip.bryden@gov.ab.ca, janice.ashcroft@gov.ab.ca,
>> veronica.jubinville@gov.ab.ca, ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca,
>> eric.tolppanen@gov.ab.ca, heidi.friedrich@gov.ab.ca,
>> bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca,
>> mcu@justice.gc.ca, michelle.doyle@gov.ab.ca, geoff.crowe@edmontonpolice.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, monika_schaefer@hotmail.com
>> premier@gov.bc.ca, radical@radicalpress.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>> markandcaroline@gmail.com, andre@jafaust.com, premier@gnb.ca,
>> press@bankofengland.co.uk, premier@gov.nl.ca,  PREMIER@gov.ns.ca,
>> premier@gov.pe.ca, brian.jean@assembly.ab.ca
>>
>> Hey David Eby
>>
>> How dumb to do think I am? I hung up on your assistant as soon as she
>> asked me that sneaky question. EVERY politician's assistant asked me
>> the same damned question since 2002 when they realized they were in
>> deep shit. Look how many responses I got over the years in which
>> politicians always deferred me to someone else rather than call me a
>> liar. DUHHH??? Did you forget you are a lawyer and how much I love to
>> sue lawyers?
>>
>> Everybody and his dog knows I have homeless for eleven years. I made
>> certain that you politicians and your corrupt cops knew that far too
>> many evil people have made fun about that fact over the years for to
>> try to play dumb now.
>>
>> Remember these perverts" video about my ongoing lawsuit in Federal Court?
>>
>> The Mad Shangi Show "The Roast of David Raymond Amos: Cyberstalker"
>> Streamed live on Apr 23, 2016
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wu8z4ouinY0
>>
>> (BTW the perverts Doran and Winters and the corrupt cops covering for
>> them in Calgary and Edmonton got the same email you are acknowledging)
>>
>> Hell because of the fact that I am homeless I can't even vote. However
>> I did manage to run for public office FOUR more times thus far since I
>> crossed paths with YOU on June 19th, 2004 CORRECT Stevey Boy Harper?
>>
>> Remember when I explained it to Mean Mikey Duffy's old buddy Stevey
>> Boy Murphy on CTV during the election of the 39th Parliament while my
>> young family spent their first Xmass without their Father? Man you
>> smiling bastards are cruel EH?
>>
>> Me,Myself and I
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ERN3OrEBWU
>>
>> CBC and all their Fake Left political pals have never acknowleged the
>> I ever ran for public office let alone the reasons why I returned to
>> Canada the first time in order to run for a seat in the the 38th
>> Parliament when I did have a Yankee home N'esy Pas Mr Prime Minister
>> Trudeau "The Younger" ?
>>
>> David Eby as a former "Human Rights" lawyer YOU and your buddy Premier
>> Clarke and all her old pals such as Gordy Campbell and Wally Oppal
>> certainly know why. YOU Ebly cannot deny obvious. The document
>> entitled to "Maritime Attorney Generals" that was attached to the
>> email your assistant is responding today should have you think twice
>> before pissing me off even further.
>>
>> For the PUBLIC RECORD anyone can read the text of the email from Gordy
>> Campbell to me in June 2008 just scroll down. Your NDP fanboyz in in
>> Fat Fred City were so excited to read it they blogged about it almost
>> instantly and inserted a a snap shot of mean old me from Murphy's CTV
>> interview and then teased me about Campbell being a smiling bastard
>> CORRECT? I bet the emai below is one of many of mine that the evil BC
>> Libranos had triple deleted EH?
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/david-amos-vs-bcs-liberal-premier.html
>>
>>
>> FYI The day the letters to Cambbell and many others were sent was the
>> very day I split Beantown for Canada in order to try to save my Clan's
>> home. After my wife was illegally evicted under threat of arrest by
>> FAKE COPS I got stuck in Canada without my family. David Eby knows
>> what I say is true his email client has ethically answered my emails
>> many times. Yet after all these years he finally has his assistant try
>> to play dumb on his behalf with a real email AFTER i called he a
>> discussed this very email with her?
>>
>> In my humble opinion YOU need a lawyer Davey Baby. The MURDERS that
>> Lonnie Landrud witnessed in BC that you as an officer of the court and
>> parliamentarian are assisting in the coverup thereof are CAPITAL
>> crimes. Check the Canadian Criminal Code you know as well as I that
>> YOU should do 14 years in JAIL if the truth of those MURDERS are ever
>> revealed. I have called your various offices several times over the
>> years and talked to your coworkers and assistants. Somebody must have
>> said something. You may not know about Landrud's latest video but you
>> must have read at least one of my emails to you and your nasty buddy
>> Josh who block my emails now. Plus you have got to remember some blogs
>> I mentioned you within EH David Ebly?
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: postur@irr.is
>> Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 02:03:06 +0000
>> Subject: Re: [Mogulegur Ruslpostur] Yo Birgitta Who is more of a crook
>> Julian Assange, the gay lawyer Glen Greenwald, the equally sneaky NDP
>> lawyer David Eby in BC or your mindless Prime Ministers of Iceland
>> To: David Amos
>>
>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received.
>>
>> Kveðja / Best regards
>> nnanríkisráðuneytið / Ministry of the Interior
>>
>>
>> lonnies interveaw 003
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Flqbj-KHGSg
>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/03/fwd-yo-bobby-boy-paulson-whereas-many.html
>>
>> Sunday, 21 December 2014
>> Fwd: Re Murdered and missing women Please view the pdf file hereto
>> attached to view a copy of Lonnie Landrud's Nov 16th, 2014 letter
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos.blogspot.ca/
>>
>>
>> Sunday, 18 May 2014
>> Yo Birgitta Who is more of a crook Julian Assange, the gay lawyer Glen
>> Greenwald, the equally sneaky NDP lawyer David Eby in BC or your
>> mindless Prime Ministers of Iceland
>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/05/yo-birgitta-who-is-more-of-crook-julian.html
>>
>>
>> I have sent you links to Lonnie Landrud's concerns countless times and
>> your email client has acknowleged that simple fact.
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/triple-deleted-emails-shed-light-on-troubling-political-culture-1.3286959
>>
>> Triple deleted emails shed light on troubling political culture
>> How access to information policy can be interpreted in so many different
>> ways.
>> By Richard Zussman, CBC News Posted: Oct 24, 2015 8:00 AM PT
>>
>> "Never write if you can speak; never speak if you can nod; never nod
>> if you can wink."
>>
>> Boston Ward boss Martin Lomasney spoke those words nearly a century
>> ago, long before the existence of emails, freedom of information or
>> Christy Clark for that matter.
>>
>> But the B.C. premier's government appears to be operating by
>> Lomasney's credo all the same. "
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "OfficeofthePremier, Office PREM:EX" Premier@gov.bc.ca
>> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 14:37:45 -0700
>> Subject: RE: This was the text of the letter to the "Not so Good" Dr.
>> Hamm Gordon Campbell c/o Att. Generals. Mikey Baker and Wally Oppal
>> years ago
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Thank you for your emails. We are acknowledging receipt of your
>> correspondence and want to let you know that your comments have been
>> noted.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wed, May 28, 2008 7:54 PM
>> To: OfficeofthePremier, Office PREM:EX; haneyt@gov.ns.ca;
>> uarb.polcom@gov.ns.ca; Casey.B@parl.gc.ca; fundyroyalndp@gmail.com;
>> day.s@parl.gc.ca; moore.r@parl.gc.ca; thompson.g@parl.gc.ca;
>> ted.tax@justice.gc.ca; hawks-cafe@hotmail.com; avalonbeef@msn.com
>> Cc: danf@danf.net; alltrue@nl.rogers.com; oldmaison@yahoo.com;
>> injusticecoalition@hotmail.com; W-Five@ctv.ca
>> Subject: This was the text of the letter to the "Not so Good" Dr. Hamm
>> Gordon Campbell c/o Att. Generals. Mikey Baker and Wally Oppal years
>> ago
>>
>> This was the latest spot that that I posted it on the web
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/05/david-amos-high-noon-email-to-ottawa.html
>>
>>
>> Hey Willy Boy
>>
>> My obvious question is did you advise the good Doctor Hamm from your
>> post in the shadows to ignore the following letter or to just quit
>> after you dudes realized what was within the material that did come
>> with it? Perhaps you should see if Mikey Baker is willing to call me a
>> liar and put it in writing before you answer this post.
>>
>> The next time you are chowing down on some tough lobster with Dr. Hamm
>> (This is no joke my baby brother drowned while fishing for scallops.
>> He did die for them. I am starting to wonder if you are being
>> personaly insulting to me. If so that was a low blow. The instant I
>> read it I saw red. Now I am on a miision to find out exactly who you
>> are) Perhaps you should ask Hamm what the Hell Mikey Baker did with
>> the copy of wiretap tape # 139. I am certain Belinda Stronach's lawyer
>> Don Amos and her lates VP Paul Cellucci would like to know when and
>> where it may surface. It does invole Horse racing, gambling and murder
>> or didn't Hamm tell you everything before offering you his job.
>>
>> For the record this is the text of the cover letter sent to Baker etc.
>>
>> Lets see what Mr. Speaker has to say now. I believe he is an ex cop
>> ain't he? Lets see if he remembers how to uphold the law. If not don't
>> you think it is high time that the lawyers in the NDP give the crooked
>> Conservative Goverment the Boot? Everybody knows they are lapdogs for
>> George W. Bush. Why else did he make it a point to fly down and see
>> them last year and snub Paul Martin and his cohorts in Ottawa?
>>
>> July 31st, 2005
>>
>> Lt. Gov. Norman L. Kwong
>> Premier Ralph Klein
>> c/o Att. Gen. Ron Stevens
>> 208 Legislature Building
>> 9E210800 - 97 Avenue
>> Edmonton, Alberta T5K
>>
>> Lt. Gov. Iona V. Campagnolo
>> Premier Gordon Campbell
>> c/o Att. Gen. Wally Oppal
>> Stn Prov Govt PO Box 9044
>> Parliament Buildings East Annex
>> 2B6 Victoria, BC V8V 1X4
>>
>> Lt. Gov. Myra A. Freeman
>> Premier John F. Hamm
>> c/o Att. Gen. Michael Baker
>> Department of Justice 4th Floor
>> Terminal Road
>> P.O. Box 7
>> Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 2L6
>>
>> Lt. Gov. J. Léonce Bernard
>> Premier Pat G. Binns
>> c/o Att. Gen. Mildred A. Dover
>> Fourth Floor, Shaw Building, North
>> 105 Rochford Street Room 5151
>> P.O. Box 2000
>> Charlottetown, PEI C1A 7N8
>>
>> RE: Public Corruption
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> Apparently everybody wanted to play dumb about my concerns and
>> allegations so that Humpty Dumpty Martin's minority government would
>> not fall and they could party hardy while the Queen was in Canada. As
>> you all know months ago, I began faxing, emailing and calling the
>> eight other Lt. Governors I had yet to cross paths with. I fully
>> informed them of my indignation towards the Governor General Clarkson
>> and two of her other Maritime Lieutenants Roberts and Chaisson before
>> the latest wave of bad acting Yankees invaded my home in the USA
>> without warrants or due process if law.
>>
>> I made certain all of the provincial Attorney Generals and Premiers
>> can never deny the fact that I tried to make them well aware of my
>> concerns and allegations in order to make everybody should sit up and
>> pay attention. Not one person from any of your offices ever responded
>> in any fashion at all. You can be certain that I expected the
>> deliberate ignorance. It is one of the oldest tricks in the book that
>> lawyers employ in order to play their wicked game of see no evil, hear
>> no evil speak no evil. I knew it would happen particularly after Nova
>> Scotia's Conflict of Interest Commissioner Merlin Nunn had blocked my
>> emails before I had contacted you. I have no doubt it helped to
>> relieve him of his ethical dilemma before the NS NDP decided what to
>> do about their chance to unseat the Conservatives. I have no doubt
>> whatsoever many lawyers in Canada were praying that the Suffolk County
>> District Attorney would have me back in the loony bin by April 28th
>> and that all your troubles would go away. I opted to let you all have
>> your way and did not bother you anymore until the Queen had left our
>> shores and Parliament quit for the summer. Now it is my turn to have
>> some fun and raise a little Political Hell.
>>
>> While the Queen, Clarkson and Martin where all having a grand old time
>> on the Canadian dime my little Clan went through living hell down
>> here. Trust me, lawyers need to learn some new tricks. Ignorance is no
>> excuse to the law or me. Making some Canadian Attorney Generals and
>> their political buddies show me their arses is child's play to me
>> after all that I have experienced in the last few years. If you doubt
>> me ask Michael J. Bryant and Yvon Marcoux why I am so pissed at their
>> bosses and the DHS. Then check my work for yourself. If the tag team
>> of John Ashcroft and Tom Ridge could not intimidate me, believe me you
>> people don't have a prayer. Both of those dudes have quit their jobs
>> but I am still standing and squaring off against their replacements
>> now. If it were not for all the decent folks I know, the snotty ones
>> like you would make me feel ashamed to be a Canadian. There is no
>> shortage of lawyers. It is just that ethical ones that are rare birds,
>> that's all. You must know how easily the Canadian people can replace
>> you with other lawyers if it becomes widely known how willing you are
>> to ignore crime if it means some fancy dude may be compelled to suffer
>> for his own wrongs.
>>
>> The justice system is supposed to be self-policing. It should clean up
>> its own act rather than trying to maintain a false mask of integrity
>> for lawyers that are obviously criminals. It is way beyond my
>> understanding why you people would choose to support the likes of Paul
>> Martin, Adrienne Clarkson, T. Alex Hickman and Billy Matthews if you
>> are not all as crooked as hell as well. The deliberate ignorance and
>> double-talk employed by the wealthy few to dodge simple truths is
>> absolutely offensive to ordinary people blessed with the rare
>> attribute called common sense. Not all folks are like sheep.
>>
>> Paul Martin's latest tricks make for a very fine example of truly how
>> bad things are. Even amidst wholesale scandals breaking out hell, west
>> and crooked everywhere lawyers and politicians just close ranks and
>> stand together as thick as the thieves they are. I stress tested the
>> ethics of the ladies of the Bloc Quebecois and the Gomery Inquiry
>> immediately after Martin's carefully orchestrated little circus in
>> Parliament on May 19th was a matter of history. Lets just say I was
>> not surprised to not hear one peep in response from anyone other than
>> to get a call from an unidentified and very nervous but cocky Yankee
>> lawyer claiming that Tony Blair was mad at me.
>>
>> Pursuant to my phone calls, emails and faxes please find enclosed as
>> promised exactly the same hard copy of what I sent to the Canadian
>> Ambassadors Allan Rock and Franky Boy McKenna and a couple of nasty
>> FBI agents on May 12th just before an interesting event in front of
>> our home in Milton. I have also included a copy of four letters I have
>> received in response since then that you may find interesting to say
>> the least. I also sent you a copy of a letter sent to a lady Ms.
>> Condolezza Rice whom our former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney
>> considers to be the most powerful woman in the world. The CD of the
>> copy of police surveillance tape # 139 is served upon all the above
>> named Attorney Generals as officers of the court in order that it may
>> be properly investigated.
>>
>> I will not bother you with the details of what I am sending to you
>> byway of the certified US Mail because I will be serving identical
>> material to many other Canadian Authorities in hand and tell them I
>> gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy of this letter. All
>> that is important to me right now is that I secure proof that this
>> mail was sent before I make my way back home to the Maritimes. However
>> I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material than what
>> Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact the same
>> material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky Boy McKenna in
>> particular received, while I was up home running for Parliament last
>> year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so I have also
>> included a few recent items to spice things up for you. I am tired of
>> trying to convince people employed in law enforcement to uphold the
>> law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own conscience and be
>> careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest
>> assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse
>> to the law or me.
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>>
>> David R. Amos
>> 153 Alvin Ave
>> Milton, MA. 02186
>>
>> The enclosed letter from The Public Service Integrity Office, whose
>> boss recently testified before the Gomery Inquiry and following quotes
>> prove why I must speak out.
>>
>> "Well what do you expect?" said Le Hir in reaction. "Anybody who had
>> been involved in that kind of thing isn't going to admit readily, or
>> willfully, to having participated." Asked why he's waited 10 years to
>> come out with his allegations, Le Hir said he was "sworn to secrecy."
>> "I'm breaking that oath, and the only way I could have been relieved
>> by that oath was by a judge in a court saying, 'Mr. Lehir, I
>> understand that you have made an oath of secrecy; and you're hereby
>> relieved of that oath."
>>
>> "Mr. Wallace added that police and the courts, not internal rules, are
>> best-equipped to deal with bureaucrats who cross the line and break
>> the law. But Judge Gomery did not appear satisfied. "It takes a major
>> scandal to get the police involved," he said. "It is not in the nature
>> of the public service to call in the police."
>>
>> Everybody knows that in order to protect the rights and interests of
>> my Clan and to sooth my own soul, I have proven many times over that
>> all lawyers, law enforcement authorities, and politicians in Canada
>> and the USA are not worthy of the public trust. I maintain that their
>> first order of business is to protect the evil longstanding system
>> they have created for their own benefit rather than the people they
>> claim to serve. Call me a liar and put it in writing. I Double Dog
>> Dare ya.
>>
>>
>> Baker got my material. So did everyone else. Only the Attorney General
>> in Quecbec refused it. I bet our newest Governor General knows why. It
>> is likely for the same reason she will not accept my emails. It should
>> be obvious to anyone why I must sue the Crown.
>>
>>
>> USPS Track and Confirm
>>
>> Label/Receipt Number: ED71 7170 440U S
>> Detailed Results:
>>
>> Delivered Abroad, August 05, 2005, 9:23 am, CANADA
>>
>> At Foreign Delivery Unit, August 05, 2005, 8:10 am, CANADA
>>
>> Out of Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 2:52 pm, CANADA
>>
>> Into Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 2:22 pm, CANADA
>>
>> Arrived Abroad, August 04, 2005, 2:22 pm, CANADA
>>
>> International Dispatch, August 03, 2005, 10:28 am, KENNEDY AMC
>>
>> Enroute, August 03, 2005, 9:08 am, JAMAICA, NY 11499
>>
>> Acceptance, August 02, 2005, 10:32 am, QUINCY, MA 02169
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: stephane.dion.c1@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 01:33:47 +0000
>> Subject: Réponse automatique : David Eby's sneaky question I am
>> HOMELESS Thus I have no MLA whatsoever nor an MP or Congressman
>> willing speak for me or to me for that matter.
>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> -English follows-
>>
>> Bonjour,
>>
>> Merci de prendre note que je suis absent du bureau jusqu'au 22 août 2016.
>>
>> Pour toute demande, je vous prie de communiquer avec le bureau de
>> circonscription par courriel au : stephane.dion@parl.gc.ca ou par
>> téléphone au (514) 335-6655.
>>
>> Salutations distinguées,
>>
>> Jocelyn Decoste
>> Chef de Bureau
>>
>> ***
>> Greetings,
>>
>> Please take note that I am absent from the office until August 22, 2016.
>>
>> For any request, please contact the Riding office by email at:
>> stephane.dion@parl.gc.ca or by phone at (514) 335-6655.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Jocelyn Decoste
>> Head of Office
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "Joly, Mélanie (PCH)" hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca
>> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 01:33:48 +0000
>> Subject: Accusé de réception / Acknowledge Receipt
>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable Mélanie Joly, ministre du Patrimoine
>> canadien.
>>
>> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
>> adressée à la ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir
>> un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous
>> assurer que votre message sera lu avec soin.
>>
>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Mélanie Joly, Minister of
>> Canadian Heritage.
>>
>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
>> addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay
>> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
>> carefully reviewed.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 21:33:35 -0400
>> Subject: Re: David Eby's sneaky question I am HOMELESS Thus I have no
>> MLA whatsoever nor an MP or Congressman willing speak for me or to me
>> for that matter.
>> To: gopublic@cbc.ca, w5@ctv.ca, newsroom@globeandmail.ca, ,
>> news@kingscorecord.comnews@hilltimes.com,  editor@stcroixcourier.ca,
>> mckeen.randy@gmail.com, mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com,
>> randy.mckeen@gnb.ca, david@lutz.nb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca
>> david.eidt@gnb.ca, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca, jeff.carr@bellaliant.net,
>> greg.horton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
>> Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov, dions1@parl.gc.ca,Friday.Joe@psic-ispc.gc.ca,
>> hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca, upriverwatch@gmail.com,
>> kedgwickriver@gmail.com, Kellie.Leitch.C1A@parl.gc.ca,
>> maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca, stephen.harper.a1@parl.gc.ca,
>> Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, allison.christians@mcgill.ca,
>> michael.duffy@sen.parl.gc.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, steve.murphy@ctv.ca,
>> hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, brian.t.macdonald@gnb.ca, jake.stewart@gnb.ca,
>> blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, sunrayzulu@shaw.ca, Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca, >> rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca, rona.ambrose.A1@parl.gc.ca,
>> themayor@calgary.ca, don.iveson@edmonton.ca, scott@scottmckeen.ca
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 19:54:48 -0400
>> Subject: FWD Attn Gail Thomsen RE My human, civil and legal rights I
>> just called about your Deputy Minister Philip Bryden before I sue
>> Alberta bigtime this time.
>> To: gopublic@cbc.ca, w5@ctv.ca, newsroom@globeandmail.ca, 
>> news@kingscorecord.com, news@hilltimes.com, editor@stcroixcourier.ca,
>> mckeen.randy@gmail.com, mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com,
>> randy.mckeen@gnb.ca, david@lutz.nb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, 
>> david.eidt@gnb.ca, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca,  jeff.carr@bellaliant.net,
>> greg.horton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,  greg.byrne@gnb.ca,  washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
>> Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov, dions1@parl.gc.ca, Friday.Joe@psic-ispc.gc.ca
>> hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca, upriverwatch@gmail.com,
>> kedgwickriver@gmail.com, Kellie.Leitch.C1A@parl.gc.ca,
>> >> Cc: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca,
>> brian.t.macdonald@gnb.ca, jake.stewart@gnb.ca,
>> blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, sunrayzulu@shaw.ca, Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca, >> rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca, rona.ambrose.A1@parl.gc.ca,
>> themayor@calgary.ca, don.iveson@edmonton.ca, scott@scottmckeen.ca
>>
>> You can bet dimes to dollars that I called the former :Human Rights"
>> lawyer David Ebly immediately and discussed with his assistant this
>> email and Barry Winters latest blogs published out of  Edmonton
>> Alberta.
>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2016/07/attn-gail-thomsen-re-my-human-civil-and.html
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "Eby.MLA, David" David.Eby.MLA@leg.bc.ca
>> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 23:22:16 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Gail Thomsen RE My human, civil and
>> legal rights I just called about your Deputy Minister Philip Bryden
>> before I sue Alberta bigtime this time.
>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Thank you for contacting my Community Office.
>> This automated response is to assure you that your message has been
>> received by my office and will be reviewed as soon as possible, noting
>> that constituents of Vancouver-Point Grey have priority. Please be
>> sure to respond back and include your home address or postal code if
>> you haven't already, to confirm you are a resident of Vancouver-Point
>> Grey.
>>
>> Due to the high volume of correspondence received, I am not be able to
>> respond personally to every inquiry. In most cases, anonymous, cc'd,
>> and forwarded items will not receive a response. Please do not
>> hesitate to contact my office should you have any questions regarding
>> the status of your query.
>>
>> Should you have a situation that requires immediate attention, please
>> call Service BC, toll-free at 1-800-663-7867
>> and they will connect you to the appropriate government ministry.
>>
>> To find out which MLA represents your neighbourhood, you can enter
>> your postal code here to get their contact information:
>> https://www.leg.bc.ca/learn-about-us/members
>>
>> Thanks again for writing,
>> Community office of David Eby MLA, Vancouver-Point Grey
>> 2909 West Broadway, Vancouver BC V6K 2G6
>> 604-660-1297 | www.davidebymla.ca
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7/21/16, Eby.MLA, David wrote:
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "Eby.MLA, David" David.Eby.MLA@leg.bc.ca
>> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 23:07:42 +0000
>> Subject: Your MLA RE: Attn Gail Thomsen RE My human, civil and legal
>> rights I just called about your Deputy Minister Philip Bryden before I
>> sue Alberta bigtime this time.
>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> David:
>> Thanks for sharing David Eby and our office on your email.
>>
>> As I cannot tell from your email, I am hopeful that you can respond
>> with your mailing address so that we can determine your MLA in order
>> to best direct your concerns. If you'd prefer, you may enter your
>> postal code here to determine your MLA:
>> https://www.leg.bc.ca/learn-about-us/members
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Gala Milne | Constituency Assistant | David Eby, MLA Vancouver-Point Grey
>> 加拉 米爾尼 | 省議員尹大衛選區助理
>> Official Opposition Spokesperson for Housing, Liquor, Gaming, PavCo
>> and Translink
>> P: 604-660-1297 | gala.milne@leg.bc.ca | 2909 West Broadway Vancouver V6K
>> 2G6
>> https://davidebymla.ca
>>
>> Sign up for David’s newsletter by going here!
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
>> Sent: July 20, 2016 4:21 PM
>> To: gail.thomsen@gov.ab.ca; philip.bryden@gov.ab.ca;
>> janice.ashcroft@gov.ab.ca; veronica.jubinville@gov.ab.ca;
>> ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca; heidi.friedrich@gov.ab.ca;
>> eric.tolppanen@gov.ab.ca; bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
>> Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca; pm@pm.gc.ca; mcu@justice.gc.ca;
>> Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca; michelle.doyle@gov.ab.ca;
>> geoff.crowe@edmontonpolice.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com; monika_schaefer@hotmail.com;
>> premier@gov.ab.ca;  premier@gov.bc.ca; David.Eby.MLA@leg.bc.ca;
>> radical@radicalpress.com; oldmaison@yahoo.com;
>> markandcaroline@gmail.com; andre@jafaust.com; premier@gnb.ca;
>> press@bankofengland.co.uk; premier@gov.nl.ca; PREMIER@gov.ns.ca; 
>> premier@gov.pe.ca; brian.jean@assembly.ab.ca
>> Subject: Attn Gail Thomsen RE My human, civil and legal rights I just
>> called about your Deputy Minister Philip Bryden before I sue Alberta
>> bigtime this time.
>>
>> As per our conversation within the past hour her is one of the emails
>> ipromised to send.  Whereas you are in charge of the IT feel free to
>> check my files closely to verify that they are for real.
>>
>> Hereto attached in a pdf form are the same documents that your former
>> Attorney General Ron Stevens received from byway of REGISTERED US MAIL
>> signature rquired in Aigust of 2005. They are also exactly the same
>> docments I served in hand personally to the lawyer Philip Byrden in
>> January 2005 within his Dean's office of the UNB law school while I
>> was running in the election of the 39th Parliament in Fredericton NB.
>> Bryden actually actually thanked me for my document then his pals on
>> the UNB campus tried to have me arrested on polling because they did
>> not believe I was a canadidate. Furthermore why i had served Byrden
>> was because barred under threat of arrest from an advertised "All
>> Canadidates" on the UNB campus held by the CBC and the Irving Media
>> who also denied my status as a candidate. Go Figure EH Melaney Joly?
>>
>> The text of the emails below should help bring the lawyer  Premier
>> Notely up to speed before I sue her and her cohhorts personally.
>>
>> Veritas Vincint
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>> http://www.alberta.ca/albertaFiles/includes/DirectorySearch/goaBrowse.cfm?txtSearch=Crown%20Prosecutors&Ministry=JSG
>>
>> Ganley, Kathleen, Honourable
>> Minister of Justice and Solicitor General
>> Office of the Minister
>>
>> Justice and Solicitor General
>> 424 Legislature Building
>> 10800 - 97 Avenue
>> Edmonton, AB
>> T5K 2B6
>>
>> Phone: 780 427-2339
>> Fax: 780 422-6621
>> E-mail:    ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca
>>
>> Bryden, Philip
>> Deputy Minister of Justice and Deputy Solicitor General
>> Office of the Deputy Minister, Justice and Solicitor General and
>> Deputy Attorney General
>>
>> Justice and Solicitor General
>> 2nd fl Bowker Building
>> 9833 - 109 Street
>> Edmonton, AB
>> T5K 2E8
>>
>> Phone: 780 427-5032
>> E-mail:    philip.bryden@gov.ab.ca
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 06:26:29 -0400
>> Subject: Fwd: Attn Philip Hammond and Andrew Bailey Re FCA file #-
>> 20131007 (Mon, 7 Oct 2013), the FSB, Federal Court file no T-1557-15
>> ,secret oaths to the British Queen and evil Yankee and Canadian Feds etc
>> To: public.enquiries@hmtreasury.gsi.gov.uk, Andrew.Bailey@fca.org.uk,
>> office@runnymedeweybridgeconservatives.com, hammondp@parliament.uk,
>> boris.johnson.mp@parliament.uk, ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk,
>> editor@stcroixcourier.ca, news-tips@nytimes.com, newsonline@bbc.co.uk,
>> gopublic@cbc.ca, newsroom@globeandmail.ca, news@dailymail.co.uk
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, janan.ganesh@ft.com,
>> sean.farrell@theguardian.com, press.office@fca.org.uk,
>> Chris.Hamilton@fca.org.uk
>>
>> https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/jul/17/andrew-bailey-financial-conduct-authority-chill-may-wind
>> sean.farrell@theguardian.com
>>
>> http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/321637da-4aaa-11e6-b387-64ab0a67014c.html#axzz4EqqgAxTw
>> janan.ganesh@ft.com,
>>
>> https://www.the-fca.org.uk/about/fca-board/andrew-bailey
>>
>> Andrew Bailey
>> FCA Head Office
>> 25 The North Colonnade
>> London E14 5HS
>> Tel +44 207 066 1000
>>
>> Rt Hon Philip Hammond MP
>> Parliamentary
>> House of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA
>> Tel: 020 7219 4055
>> Fax: 020 7219 5851
>> Email: hammondp@parliament.uk
>>
>> Constituency
>> Runnymede and Weybridge Conservative Association, Curzon House, Church
>> Road, Windlesham, Surrey, GU20 6BH
>> Tel: 01276 472910
>> Email: office@runnymedeweybridgeconservatives.com
>>
>> Departmental
>> HM Treasury, 1 Horse Guards Road, London, SW1A 2HQ
>> Tel: 020 7270 5000
>> Email: public.enquiries@hmtreasury.gsi.gov.uk
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 05:40:54 -0400
>> Subject: Attn Mr Chris Green Re FCA file #- 20131007 (Mon, 7 Oct
>> 2013), the FSB, Federal Court file no T-1557-15 ,secret oaths to the
>> British Queen and evil Yankee and Canadian Feds etc
>> To: complaints@fca.org.uk
>> Cc: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Complaints Scheme complaints@fca.org.uk,
>> Sent: Friday, July 15, 2016 10:37 AM
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> Subject: RE: Complaint against the FCA – OUR REF 204261072 [
>> ref:_00Db0K8yP._500b0iisyi:ref ]
>>
>> Dear Mr Amos,
>>
>> I write further to my colleague's email and would be grateful if you
>> could review the below and let me know your thoughts.
>>
>> From the note I received of your call to the complaints helpline on 6
>> July, it is my understanding that you are unhappy with the way the
>> information you have provided about the wrongdoing of regulated firms
>> has been handled. As an example, you gave reference number 204252030.
>>
>> I have reviewed that reference number and can see the Complaints Team
>> wrote to you in 2013 to explain it did not believe the matters you
>> raised to be a complaint against the regulators in relation to the
>> performance of their relevant functions. I have also seen the response
>> from the contact centre under that reference on 4 July 2016.
>>
>> I haven't seen anything to show the response taken by the Complaints
>> Team in 2013 or the contact centre in July 2016 to be incorrect so if
>> there is something I have missed then please let me know. I have
>> reviewed other reference numbers as well but would need to have
>> something more specific about the actions of the FCA in order to
>> investigate a complaint.
>>
>> I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience and
>> will not take any further action until I do.
>>
>> Yours sincerely
>>
>> Chris Green
>> Senior Complaints Investigator
>> Complaints Team / Corporate Services
>>
>> Financial Conduct Authority
>> 25 The North Colonnade
>> Canary Wharf
>> London
>> E14 5HS
>>
>> Tel:  +44 (0)20 7066 9870
>> www.fca.org.uk
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Complaints Scheme complaints@fca.org.uk
>> Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 10:00:20 +0000
>> Subject: AMOS David -FW: I just called the Nottingham cops again about
>> Owen Foster and his buddies Mr Baconfat and Dean Roger Ray- 20131007
>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com, Consumer.Queries@fca.org.uk
>>
>> Dear Mr Amos
>>
>> Thank you for your email of 6 October 2013.
>>
>> The Financial Services Act 2012 (the Act) requires the regulators to
>> maintain a Complaints Scheme (the Scheme) for the investigation of
>> complaints arising in connection with the exercise of, or failure to
>> exercise, any of their relevant functions other than their legislative
>> functions.
>>
>> The Scheme can be viewed on the FCA website at:
>> www.fca.org.uk/about/governance/complaining-about-us.
>> We do not consider the matter you have raised to be a complaint
>> against the regulators and so we have forwarded your correspondence to
>> the FCA Customer Contact Centre for their consideration.
>>
>> Contact details for the Customer Contact Centre:
>> Email: consumer.queries@fca.org.uk
>> Tel: 0800 111 6768 or +44 20 7066 1000 from outside of the UK
>> Website: www.fca.org.uk/consumers/consumer-helpline
>>
>> Yours sincerely
>> Elmoukaram Eisa
>> Complaints Team / Corporate Services / Chairman's Office
>>
>> Financial Conduct Authority
>> 25 The North Colonnade
>> Canary Wharf
>> London
>> E14 5HS
>>
>> Tel:    +44 (0)20 7066 9870
>> www.fca.org.uk
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 05 October 2013 21:27
>> To: kevin.dennis@nottinghamshire.pnn.police.uk; Complaints Scheme;
>> george.osborne.mp; pm; steven.blaney; Ian.McPhail
>> Cc: David Amos; Michelle.Boutin; rod.knecht; roger.l.brown;
>> bernadine.chapman; nopcc@nottinghamshire.pnn.police.uk; zach; johnc;
>> Glen Canning; steve.murphy; acampbell; oldmaison
>> Subject: I just called the Nottingham cops again about Owen Foster and
>> his buddies Mr Baconfat and Dean Roger Ray
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Nottinghamshire Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner
>>
>> Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 21:27:18 +0100
>> Subject: Auto Reply
>> To: David Amos
>>
>> I acknowledge receipt of your e-mail, which has been received by the
>> Nottinghamshire Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner.  A full
>> response will be sent to you in due course.
>>
>> In the interim you might find what you are looking for on our website:
>> http://www.nottinghamshire.pcc.police.uk/Home.aspx
>>
>> If you have information about any crime, you can contact the
>> Nottinghamshire Police non emergency number on 101.
>>
>> In an emergency, for example where life is in danger or a crime is in
>> progress, call 999.
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>> Nottinghamshire Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner
>>
>> 0115 9670999 Ext 801 2005
>>
>> Unless otherwise stated please treat as restricted.
>> Internet e-mail is not to be treated as a secure means of
>> communication.
>> Nottinghamshire Police monitors all Internet e-mail activity
>> and content.
>>
>> This communication is intended for the addressee(s) only.
>> Please notify the sender if received in error.
>> Unauthorised use or disclosure of the content may be unlawful.
>> There is no intent, by Nottinghamshire Police, that this e-mail
>> should constitute a legally binding document, nor do opinions
>> expressed herein necessarily represent official policy.
>> Find out about Nottinghamshire Police by visiting
>> www.nottinghamshire.police.uk
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 05:10:38 -0300
>> Subject: RE IPCC reference 2013/015918 I believe the Brits just
>> figured out that I hate it when cops lie to me Say hey to the Corrupt
>> Kevin Dennis and Our Queen for me Cya all in court
>> To: crimemanagement.bureau@nottinghamshire.pnn.police.uk,
>> nopcc@nottinghamshire.pnn.police.uk,
>> kevin.dennis@nottinghamshire.pnn.police.uk,
>> enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk, merlita.bryan@nottinghamcity.gov.uk,
>> Ian.Malcolm@nottinghamcity.gov.uk
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/i-just-called-nottingham-cops-again.html
>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/somebody-should-inform-lord-mayor-of.html
>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: !enquiries enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
>> Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 14:41:21 +0100
>> Subject: IPCC reference 2013/015918
>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Dear Mr Amos
>>
>> Thank you for your email.
>>
>> The IPCC oversees the police complaints system in England and Wales.
>> You can make a complaint if you have been the victim of behaviour you
>> felt was inappropriate by a police officer or member of police staff.
>> It is not clear from your email if you are trying to make a complaint
>> against the police. If you are, we will need further information, such
>> as:
>>
>>>       the date(s) and time(s) of the incident (or incidents);
>>>       where the incident happened;
>>>       the name(s) and rank(s) of the police officer(s)  or police staff
>>> involved;
>>>       whether there were any witnesses other than yourself and the
>>> police
>>> officer(s) or police staff;
>>>       the names and contact details of the witnesses, if known; and
>>>       brief details of the incident, including what was said or done and
>>> details of any damage or injury which took place.
>>
>> You may find it easier to provide the details of the complaint on one
>> of our online forms. You can find this by clicking of the following
>> link:
>>
>> http://www.ipcc.gov.uk/complaints
>>
>> Yours sincerely
>>
>>
>> Simon Roome
>> Customer Contact Advisor
>> Independent Police Complaints Commission
>> Tel: 03000200096
>> Email: enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
>>
>> Help us develop and improve our website - please take a few moments to
>> complete our survey at www.ipcc.gov.uk
>>
>> The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
>> Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in
>> partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On
>> leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
>> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
>> and/or recorded for legal purposes.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Amos" motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> To: kevin.dennis@nottinghamshire.pnn.police.uk;
>> bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com; Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 9:05 AM
>> Subject: Fwd: Reply from SpectacularNumanist on "DAvid Raymond Amos
>> RCMP provocateur troll and court weasle"
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 13:24:50 -0400
>> Subject: Re: The FSB, Federal Court file no T-1557-15 ,secret oaths to
>> the British Queen and the evil Feds etc FYI I did call Moody's lawyer
>> Goggins When he did not pick up I contacted Michael Adler an he did
>> not return my call.
>> To: michael.adler@moodys.com, sallilyn.schwartz@moodys.com,
>> ir@moodys.com, Richard.Cantor@moodys.com, John.Goggins@moodys.com,
>> caitlin.workman@canada.ca, press@bankofengland.co.uk,
>> Joe.Perry@fsb.org, embassy.ottawa@mfa.ee, Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, >> john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> Marc.Litt@bakermckenzie.com, Robert_Glauber@harvard.edu,
>> PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com, sunrayzulu@shaw.ca, 
>> mcu@justice.gc.ca, bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca,
>> washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov,
>> Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca, pol7163@calgarypolice.ca,
>> patrick_doran1@hotmail.com, rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca,
>> cps@calgarypolice.ca, eps@edmontonpolice.ca>
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
>> b.spurlock@octafinance.com, s.holbrook@octafinance.com,
>> NBInvestigates@cbc.ca, Bill.Morneau@canada.ca,
>> bostncs@international.gc.ca
>>
>> So before I leave for a little vacation and not be available for
>> awhile. I will leave you all with some very serious stuff to consider.
>>
>> Sometimes less is more so this email should prove to the RCMP who will
>> no doubt wish to harass me some more and all your lawyers that I am
>> not joking when acting in defense of my Clan. If you don't believe me
>> ask the Wilson-Raybould and her many minions about my lititigation ask
>> the Queen of England and I bet ya they will all play as dumb as post
>> as per their oath to the Queen's Privy Council or the BAR.
>>
>> Need I say you snobby Yankee lawyers who take the liberty to assume
>> the title of  "Esquire" a joke to mean old me?
>>
>> I would lay odds that my long dead Loyalist ancesters are rolling in
>> the their graves in Fundy Royal and laughing at a very simple but oh
>> so true statement made by a wild child of theirs. FYI your Yankee
>> Constitution does not recognize titles so you and lord over your
>> fellow men. Who the Hell are you to call yourselves sons of Lords?
>>
>> To be fair to the nasy Yankees Politicians who call themselves
>> Honourable are the biggest jokes of all
>>
>> Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, P.C., M.P.
>> Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
>>
>> Parliament Hill:
>> Telephone: 613-992-1416
>> Fax: 613-992-1460
>>
>> Department:
>> Justice
>> 284 Wellington Street
>> Ottawa, Ontario
>> K1A 0H8
>> Telephone: 613-992-4621
>> TTY: 613-992-4556
>> Fax: 613-954-0811
>> E-Mail: mcu@justice.gc.ca
>>
>> First things first have a Look at the 3 documents hereto attached (Not
>> a big read)
>>
>> Listen to these old voicemails from interesting FEDS at about  the
>> same point in time (Won't take long)
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc
>>
>> then ask youselves or the lawyers Senator Shelby or Spizter or Cutler
>> or Bernie madoff's old buddy Robert Glauber where the webcast and
>> transcript went for a very important hearing held in late 2003 by the
>> United States Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
>>
>> http://www.banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/hearings?ID=90F8E691-9065-4F8C-A465-72722B47E7F2
>>
>> Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the
>> Mutual Fund Industry
>>
>> November 20, 2003 02:00 PM
>> The Committee will meet in OPEN SESSION to conduct the second in a
>> series of hearings on the “Review of Current Investigations and
>> Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry.”
>>
>>     Archived Webcast
>>
>> Witness Panel 1
>>
>> Mr. Stephen M. Cutler
>>     Director - Division of Enforcement
>>     Securities and Exchange Commission
>>     cutler.pdf (175.5 KBs)
>>
>> Mr. Robert Glauber
>>     Chairman and CEO
>>     National Association of Securities Dealers
>>     glauber.pdf (171.1 KBs)
>>
>> Eliot Spitzer
>>     Attorney General
>>     State of New York
>>     spitzer.pdf (68.2 KBs)
>>
>> Permalink:
>> http://www.banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2003/11/review-of-current-investigations-and-regulatory-actions-regarding-the-mutual-fund-industry
>>
>>
>> Trust that the evil women and men that  PM Trudeau "The Younger"
>> appointed to to his cabinet will continue to play dumb because of
>> their oath to The Privy Council. However it does not follow that
>> everybody who works for them are dumb and they have no such oath to
>> uphold N'esy Pas?.
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>>
>> PS Perhaps you all should scroll down and read some more EH Robert
>> Glauber?
>>
>> https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/nasd/nasd2003201/srnasd2003201-9.pdf
>>
>> http://mapper.nndb.com/maps/417/000011384/
>>
>> You dudes forgot somebody EH? Well the FEDS never did EH Mindless
>> Marcy Litt and Petey Baby MacKay?.
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html
>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/01/good-evening-special-agent-mark.html
>>
>> BTW the obvious harassment continues to this very day no thanks tot eh
>> RCMP and to lowly Cst Paul Lynch and his very corrupt Chief Rod Knecht
>> (an ex big cheese in RCMP)
>>
>>
>> The Mad Shangi Show "The Roast of David Raymond Amos: Cyberstalker"
>> Mad Shangi
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wu8z4ouinY0
>>
>> Streamed live on Apr 23, 2016
>>
>> From the Baconfat Chronicles:
>>
>> Pat Doran the lion he is has had enough of the criminal, craven and
>> insane David Amos!
>>
>> The Mad Shangi is dealing with our little "friend" David Amos and
>> standing betwixt Amos the animal, and McCunt.
>>
>> Shangi is hosting a show with your's truly myself, all about the
>> sordid and tawdry life, and times of Davis Ramond Amos. Our little
>> "friend's" outstanding warrants in amerka will be dicussed. Amos'
>> insane claims that our amerkan cousins attempted to "render" him to
>> Guantanamo, Amos being put on "the No Fly terrorist list" and let's
>> not forget his living of the avails of prostitution from his children
>> in Boston!
>>
>> Call constable Paul Lynch little David!
>>
>> http://eateshite.blogspot.ca/2016/04/encyclopedia-dramatica-and-david-anus.html
>>
>> Saturday, 16 April 2016
>> Encyclopedia Dramatica and the David Anus!
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Revision as of 04:25, 16 April 2016 (view source)
>> TheMadShangi (Talk | contribs)
>>
>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html
>>
>> From: Tom Pulcine Tom.Pulcine@priv.gc.ca
>> Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 06:31:03 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Glen Greenwald and the Brazilian
>> President Rousseff's indignant tweets So Stevey Boy Harper your CSEC
>> dudes and their NSA pals no doubt know all about my conversation with
>> the dudes from Brazil last month Wheras the CBC and the Guar...
>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Effective December 8, 2011, I have retired from the Public Service. My
>> replacement as CFO and DG Corporate Services is Daniel Nadeau. He can
>> be reach at 613-996-5336.
>>
>> Je suis retraité de la fonction publique à compter du 8 décembre 2011.
>> Daniel Nadeau sera mon remplaçant à titre d'APF et Directeur général
>> de la gestion intégrée. Il peut être joint au 613-996-5336.
>>
>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Póstur FOR postur@for.is
>>>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:05:47 +0000
>>>> Subject: Re: Hey Premier Gallant please inform the questionable
>>>> parliamentarian Birigtta Jonsdottir that although NB is a small "Have
>>>> Not" province at least we have twice the population of Iceland and
>>>> that not all of us are as dumb as she and her Prime Minister pretends
>>>> to be..
>>>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið  / Your request has been received
>>>>
>>>> Kveðja / Best regards
>>>> Forsætisráðuneytið  / Prime Minister's Office
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is the docket
>>>>
>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>>>>
>>>> These are digital recordings of  the last two hearings
>>>>
>>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>>>>
>>>> Jan 11th https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>>>>
>>>> This me running for a seat in Parliament again while CBC denies it
>>>> again
>>>>
>>>> Fundy Royal, New Brunswick Debate – Federal Elections 2015 - The Local
>>>> Campaign, Rogers TV
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cFOKT6TlSE
>>>>
>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276
>>>>
>>>> Veritas Vincit
>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>> 902 800 0369
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>> dudes are way past too late
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>>
>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Merci ,
>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>>
>>
>> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>
>> January 13, 2015
>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>
>> December 8, 2014
>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>
>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>
>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>
>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>> campaign of 2006.
>>
>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>
>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>
>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>
>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>> essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An
>> ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear
>> and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,”
>> or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of
>> terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states
>> “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of
>> Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an
>> ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the
>> Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
>>
>> One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty
>> was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the
>> amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time
>> denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time
>> self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of
>> “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the
>> G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious
>> behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister
>> Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully
>> cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits
>> are not.
>>
>> Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal
>> mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the
>> world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy”
>> David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security
>> and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can
>> and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing
>> “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war
>> criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending
>> tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
>>
>> In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
>> “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
>> successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing,
>> marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian
>> military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern
>> equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are
>> antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five
>> years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that
>> won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
>>
>> My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
>> Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin
>> Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not
>> served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social
>> democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and
>> other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet
>> these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to
>> other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
>>
>> Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security,
>> and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before
>> shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
>>
>> Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now
>>
>> From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
>> Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and
>> the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still
>> alive
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
>> your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply
>> to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
>>
>>>>>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
>> Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the
>> War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
>> To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil,
>> Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, john.adams@cse-cst.gc.ca,
>> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, stoffp1@parl.gc.ca,
>> dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca,
>> milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca,
>> sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir@althingi.is, smari@immi.is,
>> greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca,
>> susan@blueskystrategygroup.com, Don@blueskystrategygroup.com,
>> eugene@blueskystrategygroup.com, americas@aljazeera.net
>> Cc: Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca, terry.seguin@cbc.ca, acampbell@ctv.ca,
>> whistleblower@ctv.ca
>>
>> I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David
>> Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's
>> Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on
>> CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To
>> be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested
>> that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise
>> if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else
>> about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact  that  your
>> old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English
>> never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is
>> interesting though
>>
>> http://www.blueskystrategygroup.com/index.php/team/don-newman/
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/media/story/2010/05/04/al-jazeera-english-launch.html
>>
>> Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
>> this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
>> Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad
>> Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
>>
>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
>>
>> The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a
>> shy political animal
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>> Enjoy Mr Weston
>> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/news/story/2011/05/15/weston-iraq-invasion-wikileaks.html
>>
>> "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
>> brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
>> says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
>> to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
>> including a Canadian general.
>>
>> That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
>> who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
>> U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was
>> also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
>> prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
>>
>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2010/06/canada-and-united-states.html
>>
>> "I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
>> being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
>> demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
>> "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
>> into the US policy.
>>
>> At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
>> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
>> in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
>> report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was
>> never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
>> were deployed WMD.
>>
>> Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
>> invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
>> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
>> (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
>> about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
>> that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
>> authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
>>
>> There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
>> its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
>> to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
>> folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
>> upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions
>> are to met before US troop can redeploy?  Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of
>> Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them
>> correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the
>> George W Bush administration was onerous
>>
>> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
>> military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
>> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
>> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
>> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
>> operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
>> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
>> ....not necessarily in that order. "
>>
>> You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
>> Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
>>
>> http://www.socom.mil/SOCOMHome/Pages/ContactUSSOCOM.aspx
>>
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>>
>> Recorded entry(ies) for T-1557-15
>> (
>> Court number information Court Number : T-1557-15
>>
>> Style of Cause : DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Proceeding Category : Actions Nature : Others - Crown (v. Queen)
>> [Actions]
>> Type of Action : Ordinary
>>
>> 38 records found for T-1557-15  Doc Date Filed Office Recorded Entry
>> Summary
>> - 2016-02-25 Ottawa Copy of Notice of Appeal (Appeal Court File No.
>> A-48-16 ) appealing NOTICE OF CROSS APPEAL filed in Federal Court of
>> Appeal filed in the Court of Appeal on 12-FEB-2016 on behalf of
>> Plaintiff placed on file on 25-FEB-2016
>>
>> - 2016-02-16 Ottawa Copy of Notice of Appeal (Appeal Court File No.
>> A-48-16 ) appealing Order of Southcott, J. dated 25-JAN-2016 filed in
>> the Court of Appeal on 04-FEB-2016 on behalf of Plaintiff placed on
>> file on 16-FEB-2016
>>
>> - 2016-01-25 Toronto Acknowledgment of Receipt received from Plaintiff
>> and Defendant via fax transmission confirmation with respect to Order
>> and Reasons dated 25-JAN-2016 placed on file on 25-JAN-2016
>>
>> - 2016-01-25 Toronto Certificate of Order certifying that the Court
>> (Justice Southcott) on 25-JAN-2016 ordered at the end of his Order and
>> Reasons as follows: "This Court Orders that: 1. the Plaintiff's appeal
>> is allowed in part; 2. the Order of Prothonotary Morneau dated
>> 12-NOV-2015 is set aside; 3. the claims for relief in the final
>> paragraph of the Plaintiff's Statement of Claim are struck without
>> leave to amend, with the exception of the claim for monetary relief
>> for allegedly being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick
>> legislature in 2004; 4. the Defendant is at liberty to present a
>> motion, to be filed within 30 days of the date of this Order or any
>> decision resulting from any appeal of this Order, arguing which
>> specific paragraphs of the Statement of Claim should be struck in
>> order to accord with my decision; 5. the time for the Defendant to
>> file a Statement of Defence is extended to 30 days from the date of
>> this Order, the date of any Order resulting from a motion by the
>> Defendant arguing which specific paragraphs of the Statement of Claim
>> should be struck in order to accord with my decision, and the date of
>> any decision resulting from any appea of either such Order; and 6. No
>> costs are awarded on this motion." placed on file on 25-JAN-2016
>>
>> 20 2016-01-25 Toronto Reasons and Order dated 25-JAN-2016 rendered by
>> The Honourable Mr. Justice Southcott Matter considered with personal
>> appearance The Court's decision is with regard to Motion Doc. No. 8
>> Result: granted in part 2. the Order of Prothonotary Morneau dated
>> 12-NOV-2015 is set aside; 3. claims for relief in final paragraph of
>> Plaintiff's Statement of claim are struck without leave to amend, ...
>> 4. Defendant is at liberty to present a motion, to be filed within 30
>> days.. 5. time for Defendant to file a Statement of Defence is
>> extended to 30 days... 6. No costs are awarde on this motion. **(see
>> Reasons and Order for complete wording)** Filed on 25-JAN-2016
>> certified copies sent to parties Interlocutory Decision Copy of
>> Reasons for Order entered in J. & O. Book, volume 1290 page(s) 470 -
>> 484
>>
>> - 2016-01-11 Fredericton Receipt for payment audio CD hearing Dec 14,
>> 2015 and Jan 11, 2016. Req.by Roger Richard placed on file on
>> 11-JAN-2016
>>
>> - 2016-01-11 Fredericton Receipt for payment copy audio CD recording
>> hearing Jan 11, 2016. Requested by Plaintiff placed on file on
>> 11-JAN-2016
>>
>> - 2016-01-11 Fredericton Fredericton 11-JAN-2016 BEFORE The Honourable
>> Mr. Justice Southcott Language: E Before the Court: Motion Doc. No. 8
>> on behalf of Plaintiff Result of Hearing: Matter reserved held in
>> Court Duration per day: 11-JAN-2016 from 09:31 to 10:47 Courtroom :
>> Courtroom No. 1 - Fredericton Court Registrar: Michel Morneault Total
>> Duration: 1h16min Appearances: David Raymond Amos 902-800-0369
>> representing the Plaintiff on his own behalf Jill Chisholm
>> 902-426-7570 representing Defendant Comments: DARS Z005130 was used
>> for the recording of the hearing Minutes of Hearing entered in Vol.
>> 943 page(s) 475 - 477 Abstract of Hearing placed on file
>>
>> - 2015-12-23 Ottawa Acknowledgment of Receipt received from all
>> parties with respect to the Order of the Court rendered on December
>> 14, 2015. (via fax) placed on file on 23-DEC-2015
>>
>> 19 2015-12-23 Fredericton Order dated 14-DEC-2015 rendered by The
>> Honourable Mr. Justice Bell Matter considered with personal appearance
>> The Court's decision is with regard to Motion Doc. No. 8 Result:
>> Delivered orally from the Bench on December 14, 2015. As a result of
>> my recusal, this Court orders that the Administrator of the Court
>> schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There is no order
>> as to costs. Filed on 23-DEC-2015 entered in J. & O. Book, volume 1288
>> page(s) 428 - 430 Interlocutory Decision
>>
>> - 2015-12-23 Fredericton Correction to General Sitting concerning
>> Motion Doc. No. 8 Hearing rescheduled from General Sitting at
>> Fredericton on 14-DEC-2015 to General Sitting at Fredericton on
>> 11-JAN-2016 at 09:30 duration: 2h Language: E Reason for correction:
>> The presiding Judge recused himself on 14-DEC-2015 sitting
>>
>> - 2015-12-14 Fredericton Receipt for payment CD audio recording of the
>> hearing on 14-DEC-2015, req. by Plaintiff placed on file on
>> 14-DEC-2015
>>
>> - 2015-12-14 Fredericton Fredericton 14-DEC-2015 BEFORE The Honourable
>> Mr. Justice Bell Language: E Before the Court: Motion Doc. No. 8 on
>> behalf of Plaintiff Result of Hearing: Matter adjourned sine die held
>> in Court Duration per day: 14-DEC-2015 from 09:35 to 10:42 Courtroom :
>> Courtroom No. 1 - Fredericton Court Registrar: Michel Morneault Total
>> Duration: 1h07min Appearances: David Raymond Amos 902-800-0369
>> representing on his own behalf Jill Chisholm 902-426-7570 representing
>> Defendant Comments: Tascam Backup was used for the recording of the
>> hearing. Plaintiff requested an audio CD of the hearing. Minutes of
>> Hearing entered in Vol. 943 page(s) 46 - 47 Abstract of Hearing placed
>> on file
>>
>> 17 2015-12-10 Halifax Solicitor's certificate of service on behalf of
>> Jill Chisholm confirming service of the Defendant's Motion Record
>> (Doc.16) upon Plaintiff by courier on 10-DEC-2015 filed on 10-DEC-2015
>>
>> 16 2015-12-10 Halifax Motion Record in response to Motion Doc. No. 8
>> containing the following original document(s): 14 15 Number of copies
>> received: 3 on behalf of Defendant filed on 10-DEC-2015
>>
>> 15 2015-12-10 Halifax Written Representations contained within a
>> Motion Record on behalf of Defendant concerning Motion Doc. No. 8
>> filed on 10-DEC-2015
>>
>> 14 2015-12-10 Halifax Affidavit of Jill Thomson sworn on 10-DEC-2015
>> contained within a Motion Record on behalf of Defendant in opposition
>> to Motion Doc. No. 8 with Exhibits 1 & 2 filed on 10-DEC-2015
>>
>> 13 2015-12-08 Fredericton Affidavit of service of David Raymond Amos
>> sworn on 08-DEC-2015 on behalf of Plaintiff confirming service of
>> doc.12 (doc.8,10,11) upon Defendant by Priority next day mail on
>> 08-DEC-2015 filed on 08-DEC-2015
>>
>> 12 2015-12-08 Fredericton Motion Record containing the following
>> original document(s): 8 10 11 Number of copies received: 3 on behalf
>> of Plaintiff filed on 08-DEC-2015
>>
>> 11 2015-12-08 Fredericton Written Representations contained within a
>> Motion Record on behalf of Plaintiff concerning Motion Doc. No. 8
>> filed on 08-DEC-2015
>>
>> 10 2015-12-08 Fredericton Affidavit of David Raymond Amos sworn on
>> 08-DEC-2015 contained within a Motion Record on behalf of Plaintiff in
>> support of Motion Doc. No. 8 with Exhibits A & B (Exhibit A is a CD)
>> filed on 08-DEC-2015
>>
>> - 2015-11-23 Fredericton Memorandum to file from Michel G. Morneault
>> dated 23-NOV-2015 a copy of the Notice of Motion filed on November
>> 20th, 2015 appealing the decision of Proth. Morneau dated November
>> 12th, 2015, sent to Mr. Morneau placed on file.
>>
>> 9 2015-11-20 Fredericton Affidavit of service of David Raymond Amos
>> sworn on 20-NOV-2015 on behalf of Plaintiff confirming service of
>> doc.8 upon Defendant by mail on 20-NOV-2015 filed on 20-NOV-2015
>>
>> 8 2015-11-20 Fredericton Notice of Motion on behalf of Plaintiff
>> returnable at General Sitting in Fredericton on 14-DEC-2015 to begin
>> at 09:30 duration: 2h language: E for an appeal of the decision of
>> Richard Morneau, Esq., Prothonotary dated 12-NOV-2015 Doc. No. 6 filed
>> on 20-NOV-2015
>>
>> - 2015-11-19 Ottawa Letter sent by Registry on 19-NOV-2015 to
>> Plaintiff providing a certified copy of the order dated 12-NOV-2015 to
>> the Plaintiff that had previously been faxed to him on 12-NOV-2015 and
>> 19-NOV-2015 Copy placed on file.
>>
>> - 2015-11-19 Ottawa Confirmation of receipt by fax printout by the
>> Plaintiff of the Order dated 12-NOV-2015 of Mr. Prothonotary Morneau
>> placed on file on 19-NOV-2015
>>
>> - 2015-11-12 Montréal Acknowledgment of Receipt received from parties
>> with respect to reception of order 6 placed on file on 12-NOV-2015
>>
>> 6 2015-11-12 Montréal Order dated 12-NOV-2015 rendered by Richard
>> Morneau, Esq., Prothonotary Matter considered without personal
>> appearance The Court's decision is with regard to Motion in writing
>> Doc. No. 2 Result: granted Filed on 12-NOV-2015 copies sent to parties
>> entered in J. & O. Book, volume 1283 page(s) 357 - 359 Interlocutory
>> Decision
>>
>> - 2015-11-06 Montréal Communication to the Court from the Registry
>> dated 06-NOV-2015 re: Notice of Motion (doc. #2) + request for
>> direction
>>
>> 18 2015-10-26 Fredericton Affidavit of service of David Raymond Amos
>> sworn on 26-OCT-2015 on behalf of Plaintiff confirming service of
>> doc.7 upon Defendant by mail on 26-OCT-2015 filed on 26-OCT-2015
>>
>> 7 2015-10-26 Montréal Motion Record in response to Motion Doc. No. 2
>> Number of copies received: 1 on behalf of Plaintiff (filed as per
>> order 6; one copy only) filed on 26-OCT-2015
>>
>> 5 2015-10-14 St. John's Solicitor's certificate of service on behalf
>> of Jill Chisholm confirming service of Doc 4 Motion Record upon
>> Plaintiff by Courier on 14-OCT-2015 filed on 14-OCT-2015
>>
>> 4 2015-10-14 St. John's Motion Record Number of copies received: 3 on
>> behalf of Defendant filed on 14-OCT-2015
>>
>> - 2015-10-14 St. John's Draft Order concerning Motion Doc. No. 2
>> received on 14-OCT-2015
>>
>> 3 2015-10-14 St. John's Written Representations contained within a
>> Motion Record on behalf of Defendant concerning Motion Doc. No. 2
>> filed on 14-OCT-2015
>>
>> 2 2015-10-14 St. John's Notice of Motion contained within a Motion
>> Record on behalf of Defendant in writing to be dealt with in the
>> Montréal local office for an Order purusant to Rules 221(1)(a) and (c)
>> to strike and an order pursuant to Rule 8 extention of time to serve
>> and file Defence. filed on 14-OCT-2015 Draft Order\\Judgment received.
>>
>> - 2015-09-16 Fredericton Letter sent by Registry on 16-SEP-2015 to DOJ
>> Halifax R.133 service letter Copy placed on file.
>>
>> 1 2015-09-16 Fredericton Statement of Claim and 2 cc's filed on
>> 16-SEP-2015 Certified copy(ies)/copy(ies) transmitted to Director of
>> the Regional Office of the Department of Justice Section 48 - $2.00
>>
>> The last database update occurred on 2016-07-14 12:09
>> Top of page
>>
>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html
>>
>>>
>>> http://joyb.blogspot.ca/2010/11/my-statement-from-nato-parliamentary.html
>>>
>>> http://50states.ning.com/video/rcmp-sussex-new-brunswick
>>>
>>> http://www.nycga.net/members/davidraymondamos/
>>>
>>>> From: David Amos
>>>> Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 23:22:00 -0300
>>>> Subject: i just called from 902 800 0369 (Nova Scotia)
>>>> To: 9.17occupywallstreet@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-...
>>>>
>>>> I am the guy the SEC would not name that is the link to Madoff and
>>>> Putnam Investments
>>>>
>>>> http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hear...
>>>>
>>>> Notice the transcript and webcast of the hearing of the US Senate
>>>> banking Commitee is missing? please notice Eliot Spitzer and the Dates
>>>> around November 20th, 2003 in te following file
>>>>
>>>> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-righ...
>>>>
>>>> From: "Julian Assange)"
>>>> Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 18:15:46 +0000 (GMT)
>>>> Subject: Al Jazeera on Iceland's plan for a press safe haven
>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> FYI: Al-Jazeera's take on Iceland's proposed media safe haven
>>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbGiPjIE1pE
>>>>
>>>> More info http://immi.is/
>>>>
>>>> Julian Assange
>>>> Editor
>>>> WikiLeaks
>>>> http://wikileaks.org/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: Birgitta Jonsdottir
>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:14:02 +0000
>>>> Subject: Re: Bon Soir Birgitta according to my records this is the
>>>> first email I ever sent you
>>>> To: David Amos
>>>>
>>>> dear Dave
>>>> i have got your email and will read through the links as soon as i
>>>> find some time
>>>> keep up the good fight in the meantime
>>>>
>>>> thank you for bearing with me
>>>> i am literary drowning in requests to look into all sorts of matters
>>>> and at the same time working 150% work at the parliament and
>>>> the creation of a political movement and being a responsible parent:)
>>>> plus all the matters in relation to immi
>>>>
>>>> with oceans of joy
>>>> birgitta
>>>>
>>>> Better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are
>>>> not.
>>>>
>>>> Andre Gide
>>>>
>>>> Birgitta Jonsdottir
>>>> Birkimelur 8, 107 Reykjavik, Iceland, tel: 354 692 8884
>>>> http://this.is/birgitta – http://joyb.blogspot.com -
>>>> http://www.facebook.com/birgitta.jonsdottir
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Henrik Palmgren redicecreations@gmail.com
>>> Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:46:26 +0200
>>> Subject: Re: Oh my my I guess we know the score on you EH?
>>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Oh my. Don't send me your spam. It's not good for anything.
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Thu, 16 Ma
>

 

No comments:

Post a Comment