http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/patrick-brown-complaint-1.4552271

james fryday

He spent 90 grand of his 120 grand income on a mortgage payment. Sure and he ate rats for supper for a year. He wants to get in the Mulrooney program where you get cash in brown envelopes hidden in a freezer.

Content disabled.

David Amos

@james fryday "He wants to get in the Mulrooney program where you get cash in brown envelopes hidden in a freezer."

He was on the Mulrooney program all along just like Bernie Lord and Harper and MacKay were back in 2003. Ask yourself what was reported in the news about who was behind Brown when he defeated Christine Elliott to become the leader in 2015.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/will-upstart-patrick-brown-upend-christine-elliott-in-ontario-pc-leadership-race-1.3056356

Will upstart Patrick Brown upend Christine Elliott in Ontario PC leadership race?
At outset, Brown was an unknown – now what's unknown is who will win
By Robert Fisher, CBC News Posted: May 02, 2015 5:00 AM ET

"Brown is in a very solid position going into this week's voting. He is now backed by a couple of party stalwarts: Postmedia CEO Paul Godfrey and Derek Burney, who served as Brian Mulroney's chief of staff and a former ambassador to the U.S.

Both have lamented a series of election losses and believe Brown can give the party — in the words of a Toronto Sun headline, "a good shake."

The tipoff that Elliott is in trouble came a couple of weeks ago, signalled by her increasing and often nasty personal attacks on Brown."

Trust that I was not surprised to see Elliott take a cushy job from Wynne (I wonder if she will get to keep it?). Methinks the dudes behind Brown in 2015 were the same folks who knocked him off his High Horse so Mulroney's daughter to grab the reigns and save the PC Party rid the folks of Carbon Tax in a nick of time.

Most folks have heard of the term useful idiot Methinks Burney and Godfrey played Brown, Hillier and Elliott like a fiddle once again N'esy Pas?

Mark Tyson

There is a lot of foul smells in the air when it come to the present PC so-called leadership. Doug Ford for one. Like I would vote for a politician who hands out money to voters.This is just so bad on so many levels.

Content disabled.

David Amos

@Mark Tyson "There is a lot of foul smells in the air when it come to the present PC so-called leadership. Doug Ford for one."

I agree but methinks all of them smell awful bad.

Now that Brown has pulled out of the leadership race and Mr Morneau's latest budget is about to be revealed this comment section has been largely ignored by the usual suspects who love to comment. Hence this my be a good spot to disclose what a joke Dominion Bond Rating Services is to me.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nb-bond-rating-agency-government-debt-1.4553080

Credit rating agency questions province's ability to control debt
Dominion Bond Rating Services changes New Brunswick’s economic trend assessment from “stable” to “negative”
By Jacques Poitras, CBC News Posted: Feb 26, 2018 9:06 PM AT

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2018/02/yo-cathy-rogers-and-bill-morneau-do-you.html

---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 17:16:02 +0000
Subject: RE: YO Cathy Rogers and Bill Morneau Do you LIEbrano Finance
Ministers or CBC have any idea what a joke Dominion Bond Rating
Services is to me?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies

David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos now5 seconds ago

Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Wikileaks_ and

YO Bill Morneau RE Me versus You on Budget Day Your foes know So for more information contact Bob Hepburn or your old pal @LindaMcQuaig http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2018/02/patrick-brown-drops-out-of-ontario-pc.html … #Budget2018 #cdnpoli Methinks we are about to enjoy another circus N'est Pas @CBCPolitics ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5wTH4CpnuI

22 Minutes: Morneau Budget Interview

14,072 views

CBC Comedy

Image result for 22 Minutes: Morneau Budget Interview

Published on Mar 29, 2016

Mark Critch sits down with Finance Minister Bill Morneau to get the budget nitty-gritty… or if you’re having trouble sleeping you could just download the budget yourself.

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Simon, Chris" <Chris.Simon@simcoe.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 15:33:04 +0000
Subject: Re: YO Bill Morneau RE Me versus You on Budget Day For more
information, please contact Bob Hepburn or your old pal Linda McQuaig
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thanks, David.

All the best,
chris
--

CHRIS SIMON | Journalist, The Barrie Advance

Metroland Media
21 Patterson Rd., Barrie ON L4N 7W6
Tel: 705-726-0573, ext. 236 | Twitter: @csimonwrite
chris.simon@simcoe.com
www.metroland.com <http://www.metroland.com/> | www.simcoe.com
<http://www.simcoe.com/>

---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 15:06:25 +0000
Subject: RE: YO Bill Morneau RE Me versus You on Budget Day For more
information, please contact Bob Hepburn or your old pal Linda McQuaig
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.

---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 15:05:59 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Bill Morneau RE Me versus You on Budget
Day For more information, please contact Bob Hepburn or your old pal
Linda McQuaig
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>

Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com

This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Brown, Patrick" <patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 15:05:56 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Bill Morneau RE Me versus You on Budget
Day For more information, please contact Bob Hepburn or your old pal
Linda McQuaig
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you very much for getting in touch. Due to the large volume of
mail that I receive, please allow time for a response. If it is a
pressing issue, please call my Queen’s Park office at 416-325-3855.
Otherwise, I will respond as soon as possible.

Regards,

Patrick Brown, MPP
Simcoe North
Leader of the Official Opposition

---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Première ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 15:05:58 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Bill Morneau RE Me versus You on Budget
Day For more information, please contact Bob Hepburn or your old pal
Linda McQuaig
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thanks for your email. I value your input and appreciate your taking
the time to get in touch with me.

Every email and letter I receive is carefully read and reviewed. Given
the volume of emails and letters I receive, and because I may need to
share your message with one of my Cabinet ministers or the appropriate
government officials for more information, a response may take several
business days.

Thanks again for contacting me.

Kathleen Wynne
Premier

Please note that we are not able to receive replies at this email
address, so please do not respond directly to this email.

* * *

Je vous remercie de votre courriel. Votre avis est important pour moi
et je vous suis reconnaissante d’avoir pris le temps de m’écrire.

Toutes les lettres et tous les courriels que je reçois sont lus
attentivement, un par un. Sachez, cependant, qu’en raison du volume
important de correspondance que je reçois et parce qu’il se peut que
j’aie à consulter l’un de mes collègues du Conseil des ministres ou un
fonctionnaire compétent en la matière, il pourrait s’écouler plusieurs
jours avant que je puisse donner suite à votre courriel.

Meilleures salutations,

Kathleen Wynne
Première ministre de l’Ontario

Veuillez ne pas répondre directement à ce courriel, car aucun courriel
ne peut être reçu à cette adresse.

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 10:52:10 -0400
Subject: YO Bill Morneau RE Me versus You on Budget Day For more
information, please contact Bob Hepburn or your old pal Linda McQuaig
To: bhepburn@thestar.ca, "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>,
lmcquaig@sympatico.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "andrew.scheer"

<andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, "guy.caron" <guy.caron@parl.gc.ca>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChU8RlwBLdk

Toronto Centre Federal Debate - 2015 Federal Elections - The Local
Campaign, Rogers TV
739 views
Rogers tv
Published on Oct 6, 2015
Toronto Centre All-Candidates'' Debate. Participants include Julian Di
Battista Conservative, Linda McQuaig New Democratic Party. Bill
Morneau Liberal, Colin Biggin Green Party, Philip Fernandez,
Marxist-Leninist Party, Jordan Stone, Independent and Mariam Ahmad,
Communist Party of Canada.

Julian Di Battista - Conservative
Linda McQuaig - New Democratic Party
Bill Morneau - Liberal
Colin Biggin - Green Party
Philip Fernandez - Marxist-Leninist Party
Jordan Stone - Independent
Mariam Ahmad - Communist

Like this program? Be the first to see it on Rogers Cable. Subscribe
to Rogers by visiting www.Rogers.com.

For more information, visit www.RogersTV.com

https://metroland.com/press-releases/metroland-media-to-publish-4-daily-papers-purchased-from-postmedia/

TORONTO, ONTARIO – November 27, 2017 – Metroland Media Group Ltd.
announced today it will continue publication of four daily newspapers
and cease publication of the print and online editions of three other
daily newspapers and eight community newspapers purchased from
Postmedia Network Inc.

The four newspapers formerly owned by Postmedia that will now be
published by Metroland Media are the St. Catharines Standard, Niagara
Falls Review, Welland Tribune and Peterborough Examiner. A total of
approximately 60 employees work at the four newspapers, which will
continue to publish on their current daily schedules.

Metroland Media Group Ltd., a subsidiary of Torstar Corporation,
purchased the publications earlier today from Postmedia Network Inc.
as part of a transaction between Torstar and Postmedia that involved a
number of community and daily newspapers, mainly in Ontario.

Bob Hepburn
Director, ommunity Relations and Communications
Toronto Star
416-869-4947
bhepburn@thestar.ca

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 10:30:36 -0400
Subject: Yo Chris Simon I just called Correct?
To: chris.simon@simcoe.com, newsroom@simcoe.com, fmatys@simcoe.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

https://www.simcoe.com/news-story/8144325-cfos-for-patrick-brown-linked-pc-riding-associations-resign/

CFOs for Patrick Brown-linked PC riding associations resign
MPP Randy Hillier said over Twitter that a CFO resigned 'when directed
to engage in unethical expenditure of funds'
News Feb 20, 2018 by Chris Simon , Frank Matys

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 18:52:04 -0400
Subject: Yo Randy Hillier I called your office and talked a guy who
had to go to a meeting Feel Free to enjoy this email and share it with
anyone you wish Clearly I did
To: randy.hillierco@pc.ola.org, randy.hillier@pc.ola.org,
integrity.mail@oico.on.ca, info@oico.on.ca, ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca,
"Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, amara.mclaughlin@cbc.ca,
"Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, Premier@ontario.ca,
patrick.brown@pc.ola.org, vic.fedeli@pc.ola.org,
vic.fedelico@pc.ola.org
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

Methinks somebody should have a long talk with me ASAP N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2018/01/yo-bill-morneau-are-opposition-leaders.html

Friday, 19 January 2018
Yo Bill Morneau are the opposition leaders Patrick Brown and Andrea
Horwath even remotely concerned about the upcoming provincial
election?

www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/patrick-brown-complaint-1.4552271

Ontario integrity commissioner investigating complaint against Patrick Brown

MPP Randy Hillier lodged complaint last week, alleging Brown failed to declare all of his income sources

CBC News Posted: Feb 26, 2018 1:14 PM ET

853 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.

Evan Mulligan

The right wing continues to make fools of themselves.

Wynne has definitely got to go, but the Tories can't even manage their own party, much less a province that's mired in debt.

Whatamess.

David Amos

@Evan Mulligan Methinks interested Tories should start reading my blog ASAPN'esy Pas? Just use Google certain names such as Mr Brown's and mine as well. It works like a char,

David Amos

@David Amos FYI In the spirit of full disclosure this is my latest Tweet with a link to this news article

"Patrick Brown drops out of Ontario PC leadership race Yea Right and we all know why Methinks I should make a few more comments ASAP Whether CBC blocks me or not folks can read them still N'esy Pas?"

pat fisher

The Cons are turning a potential gimme into a 4 putt.

Roy Stephenson

@pat fisher If Horwath doesn't win a bunch more seats from this mess, she will be out too. But maybe we will get a minority. How entertaining would that be? At least the right would get another ten years to keep imploding.

David Amos

@Roy Stephenson "But maybe we will get a minority. How entertaining would that be?"

That is the outcome of this circus that I am hoping to see

Tony Lim

Patrick Brown slams integrity complaint as 'entirely fictional'???? Really? Who's gonna believe Mr. Brown? Not me! Never!

Robin Blair

@Tony Lim

Of course Mr. Hillier has never blown anything out of proportion.....

David Amos

@Robin Blair Friends of mine who are privy to the rumour mills in Toronto and Barrie are telling me there is a lot more things that Hillier and Ford ain't telling. Hard telling not knowing for sure because I have no direct personall knowledge or evidence.

However this was published in the corporate media and largely ignored. Methinks the PC Party has some explaining to do. What say you?

https://www.simcoe.com/news-story/8144325-cfos-for-patrick-brown-linked-pc-riding-associations-resign/

CFOs for Patrick Brown-linked PC riding associations resign
MPP Randy Hillier said over Twitter that a CFO resigned 'when directed to engage in unethical expenditure of funds'
News Feb 20, 2018

"The chief financial officer in each of the two Progressive Conservative Party riding associations with direct ties to former leader Patrick Brown resigned over the last week, but party officials say there’s “no untoward reason” behind the decisions."

"In Twitter posts over the last few days, Lanark-Frontenac-Lennox and Addington MPP Randy Hillier had suggested a CFO for Brown’s riding association resigned “when directed to engage in unethical expenditure of funds."

He claims to have evidence of further ethical breaches and dishonest behaviour under Brown’s direction and plans to make that information public at a later date.

Hillier, who has expressed support for another leadership candidate, did not specify the riding association to which he was referring. He did not immediately respond to an interview request Feb. 20."

Aaron Barrett

Why is no one investigating Caroline Mulroney's and her family's relationship with CTV? CTV has a very cozy relationship with the Mulroney's which doesn't hold up to the sniff test.
How do we know one of Mulroney's people didn't plant the story? It wouldn't be the first time the Mulroney's have behaved unethically/criminally. They've got motive, opportunity and the means to make it happen.

David Amos

@Aaron Barrett "CTV has a very cozy relationship with the Mulroney's which doesn't hold up to the sniff test."

YUP Just ask Mikey Duffy or me

Naomi Forbes

On Question Period Evan Solomon asked Corolyn Mulroney 2 or 3 times what she intends to do about replacing the carbon tax because she opposes it and she couldn't answer the question......then we wonder why the Planet is in so much trouble.....more incompetent politicians are not what this country or the world needs......

steve houle

@Naomi Forbes So you admit it is a tax just a tax Only certain people can be talked in to a air tax Keep talking the more you talk the more you pay. lol

David Amos

@steve houle You are correct. It rather comical how people beg to pay more taxes so that the liberals can give it away to their corporate pals.

Robert Anderson

The never ending gong show of Ontario politics.

David Amos

@Robert Anderson Methinks anyone with a sense of humour just gotta love this circus N'esy Pas?

James Brown

Sometime about this whole Patrick Brown story and the cir cus it has created has the odour of coverup in the making. The upcoming Ontario election was theirs to win and yet somehow they manage to shoot them selves in both feet.

PC party smell, its everywhere.

David Amos

@James Brown "Sometime about this whole Patrick Brown story and the cir cus it has created has the odour of coverup in the making."

What stinks to the High Heavens with me is the Carbon Tax nonsense that Brown and everybody else wanting to get elected in Ontario was supporting.

Perhaps you should read my blog back in January. FYI before this circus began I threw Patrick Brown and his Liberal and NDP cohorts in the stew with Billy Morneau over my concerns about the budget that is being revealed today. Brown's leadership is history today However obviously my target is still Bill Morneau and his liberal puppet masters.

Mark Tyson

Content disabled.

David Amos

@Mark Tyson "There is a lot of foul smells in the air when it come to the present PC so-called leadership. Doug Ford for one."

james fryday

Content disabled.

David Amos

@james fryday "He wants to get in the Mulrooney program where you get cash in brown envelopes hidden in a freezer."

Shane MacDonald

I love the idea that this is some Liberal fabrication, when it has been his own party trying to get rid of him.

David Amos

@Shane MacDonald "it has been his own party trying to get rid of him."

True Methinks it was because he went along with the Carbon Tax nonsense N'esy Pas?

John Pochylko

He stepped down now there will be no charges , the new way to control who gets elected is by making minor claims and lies.

David Amos

@John Pochylko Methinks that it was just more of the same old same old. Sex scandals usually always work to displace a politician excepting of course Mr Trump for some strange reason N'esy Pas?

George Brett

With Brown out, Christine Elliott has to be the presumptive favorite based on OPC polling data.

David Amos

@George Brett I betting that Mulroney wins the day

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 12:40:05 -0400
Subject: Yo Tanya ask your pal Bob Bryenton (519 332 2883) or Patty Baby Brown or
his lawyers or CTV why I am so pissed off
To: "Dr. Teresa Pierre" <tanya@pafe.ca>,
"patrick.brown" <patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>, christine <christine@christine2018.ca>,
doug <doug@fordnation.ca>, caroline <caroline@carolinemulroney.ca>,

hwinkler@winklerresolution.com, julian.porter@julianporterqc.com,

news <news@kingscorecord.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, "martine.turcotte" <martine.turcotte@bell.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,

nmoore <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>,oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,

andre <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>,

newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>

You received a new 0:40 minutes voicemail message, on
Friday, February 23, 2018 at 08:35:14 AM in mailbox
9028000369 from "Bob Bryenton" <5193322883>.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/brown-ontario-pc-libel-suit-1.4550333

Former Ontario PC leader Patrick Brown sends notice of libel to CTV News
Brown accuses CTV of 'false, malicious, irresponsible and defamatory' reporting
CBC News Posted: Feb 24, 2018 7:38 AM ET

"Howard Winkler, among the team representing Brown, confirmed that CTV
had received notice."

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4386982/Patrick-Brown-notice-of-libel.pdf

http://www.lawtimesnews.com/article/former-client-suing-aird-and-berlis-winkler-8767/

Former client suing Aird & Berlis, Winkler
March 12, 2007|Written By Helen Burnett

A copyright case involving two internet companies has culminated in
one of the parties suing its former lawyer and law firm, alleging he
“breached his duty of candor to the court” and “undermined the dignity
of the legal process.”

Howard Winkler, a partner with Aird & Berlis LLP and a specialist in
civil litigation, was originally hired as lead counsel by plaintiff
Netbored Inc. in 2003, after the company claimed that one of its
former employees, who later joined defendant Avery Holdings Inc.,
breached its copyright. Winkler denies the claims made against him.

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:34:17 -0400
Subject: At least Patrick Brown's computer is still ethical
To: "Dr. Teresa Pierre" <tanya@pafe.ca>, "patrick.brown"
<patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>, christine <christine@christine2018.ca>,
doug <doug@fordnation.ca>, caroline <caroline@carolinemulroney.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Brown, Patrick" <patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:31:59 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Tanya vs. Patrick Brown Why can't
politicians be honest for a change? Why lie to me and say you did not
get my email yet send me your hustle?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you very much for getting in touch. Due to the large volume of
mail that I receive, please allow time for a response. If it is a
pressing issue, please call my Queen’s Park office at 416-325-3855.
Otherwise, I will respond as soon as possible.

Regards,

Patrick Brown, MPP
Simcoe North
Leader of the Official Opposition

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:31:55 -0400
Subject: Re: Tanya vs. Patrick Brown Why can't politicians be honest for a change?

Why lie to me and say you did not get my email yet send me your hustle?
To: "Dr. Teresa Pierre" <tanya@pafe.ca>, "patrick.brown"
<patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>, christine <christine@christine2018.ca>,
doug <doug@fordnation.ca>, caroline <caroline@carolinemulroney.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Dr. Teresa Pierre" <tanya@pafe.ca>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:01:09 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Tanya vs. Patrick Brown
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

(Tanya Granic Allen is on leave of absence while she seeks the
leadership of the PC Party of Ontario. Dr. Teresa Pierre, PAFE’s
founder, will step in as interim President.)

David,

I have several important updates since I wrote to you last Friday.

- The media reviews of Tanya Granic Allen's TVOntario debate
performance have been breathtaking. Even the liberal press has been
fawning. Thomas Walkom of The Toronto Star wrote of her "bravura"
performance and said that, compared to Tanya, Caroline Mulroney and
Christine Elliott seemed "anemic"; Mike Crawley of CBC News wrote,
“Debate proves Tanya Granic Allen will be a factor in Ontario PC
leadership race”; In The Globe and Mail, Adam Radwanski wrote that
Tanya “certainly made the most of her opportunity to set the
leadership campaign’s tone.”

- Tanya was formally accepted into the race. This is great news! It
means that she is definitely going to be on the ballot. Further, I can
assure you that Tanya is not a quitter. She is in this to the end. If
you signed up to vote for her, you will finally be allowed to vote for
a pro parental rights candidate.

- Patrick Brown has been allowed into the race. Actually, we at PAFE
don't mind this, so long as he loses! As Tanya put it so well, we
should welcome Brown's candidacy because "finally, he will be held to
account for his political crimes.”

So now what? What can we do to help Tanya?

*** MOST IMPORTANT ***: If you (or a friend, or a neighbour) paid the
$10 and joined the PC Party in order to vote for Tanya, then it is
really quite important that you go to
‎https://tanyagranicallen.nationbuilder.com/join3 and let Tanya know
that you support her! That way, Tanya’s campaign can contact you
directly with important information regarding how the ONLINE voting
system works. It is mildly complicated, so please get in touch with
them via the above link TODAY and you will be sent more information.
Please!

For everyone (PC members and everyone else too),please:

1. Go to Tanya’s new Facebook page and LIKE it!
https://www.facebook.com/TanyaGranicAllenPC/2
<https://www.facebook.com/TanyaGranicAllenPC/>

2. Tanya’s campaign needs financial support, and you can get a
generous political tax credit for your donation. Click here for more
information <https://tanyagranicallen.nationbuilder.com/donate>.

We rarely get an opportunity to support a candidate who shares our
values and beliefs. Tanya is the only candidate swho is ready to
repeal the Wynne Sex-Ed Agenda. Let's get behind her so we can stop
the sexualization of Ontario's children.

Teresa Pierre, PhD

P.S. Again, please, if you are a PC member and if you support Tanya
Granic Allen, please let her know this!
https://tanyagranicallen.nationbuilder.com/join3

-=-=-
Parents As First Educators Inc. - Canada
This email was sent to motomaniac333@gmail.com. To stop receiving
emails: http://www.pafe.ca/unsubscribe
-=-=-

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2018/02/trust-that-tvo-billy-morneau-and.html

Friday, 16 February 2018

Trust that TVO, Billy Morneau and the Mulroney lawyers know why Tanya
Granic Allen is the Lady I would like to see become the next PC leader
and everybody knows I am NOT religious

---------- Original message ----------
From: ask tvo <asktvo@tvo.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 17:52:43 +0000
Subject: RE: Trust that TVO, Billy Morneau and the Mulroney lawyers
know why Tanya Granic Allen is the Lady I would like to see become the
next PC leader and everybody know I am NOT religious
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Dear David,

Thank you for contacting TVO.

We appreciate that you’ve taken the time to share this information
with us, I’ve shared it with the appropriate people.

Regards,

Nadine
Customer Relations

Help make the world a better place through the power of learning. Donate today.

Good customer service is important to us at TVO. Please take a moment
to let us know whether or not you are satisfied with the level of
service provided by our Customer Relations Representative, by
completing this survey.

---------- Original message ----------
From: Caroline Mulroney <caroline@carolinemulroney.ca>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 05:53:12 -0800
Subject: Thank you for your message! Re: Trust that TVO, Billy Morneau
and the Mulroney lawyers know why Tanya Granic Allen is the Lady I
would like to see become the next PC leader and everybody know I am
NOT religious
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Hello,

Thank you for getting in touch with the Caroline Mulroney for Leader
campaign. We’ve heard from hundreds of people like you who are excited
about the change that Caroline will bring to Ontario as the Leader of
the PC Party and the next Premier.

We wanted to let you know that we have received your message and that
we will be in touch shortly to follow up with you.

In the meantime, if you haven’t had the opportunity to get a
membership, please visit carolinemulroney.ca to sign up and vote for
Caroline on March 2nd.

Sincerely,

The Caroline Mulroney for Leader Campaign

--

Caroline Mulroney Campaign
416-922-0573
www.CarolineMulroney.ca

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Brown, Patrick" <patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:58:32 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: FWD Whereas the purported "Progressive
Conservatives" Tim Hudak and Christine Elliott never felt that I was
worth talking to perhaps they should talk to each other about your
pals Jenni Byrne, Paul Godfrey and Derek Burney EH Stevey Bo...
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you very much for getting in touch. Due to the large volume of
mail that I receive, please allow time for a response. If it is a
pressing issue, please call my Queen’s Park office at 416-325-3855.
Otherwise, I will respond as soon as possible.

Regards,

Patrick Brown, MPP
Simcoe North
Leader of the Official Opposition

www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/patrick-brown-complaint-1.4552271

Ontario integrity commissioner investigating complaint against Patrick Brown

MPP Randy Hillier lodged complaint last week, alleging Brown failed to declare all of his income sources

CBC News Posted: Feb 26, 2018 1:14 PM ET

The complaint against Patrick Brown was made last week by PC MPP Randy Hillier. (Christopher Katsarov/Canadian Press)

Ontario's integrity commissioner confirmed Monday he is investigating a complaint against former Progressive Conservative leader Patrick Brown.

Integrity commissioner J. David Wake confirmed the probe in a statement to media early Monday afternoon.

Patrick Brown slams integrity complaint as 'entirely fictional'

Patrick Brown accused of 'dirty and crooked politics' as Ontario MPP calls for investigation

The complaint was made last week by PC MPP Randy Hillier, questioning how Brown could afford the mortgage on his $2.3 million house and alleging Brown violated the rules for MPPs by failing to declare all his sources of income.

Hillier also questioned how Brown paid for overseas trips, including travel with his girlfriend, who was a Queen's Park intern at the time. In his complaint, Hillier suggested some business people may have covered trip costs.

If Brown, his office or the PC party did not pay for the travel, failing to disclose a sponsor would breach integrity rules.

In response to Hillier's complaint last week, Brown called the allegations "imaginary" and "make-believe."

In a statement he posted to Twitter, Brown called the allegations "either entirely fictional, constituting defamatory baseless allegations … or statements of fact that are both true and perfectly acceptable."

On the questions about his mortgage and income, Brown said he spent approximately $90,000 of his annual $120,000 after-tax income on the mortgage, and lived off the rest.

On the complaint about his travel, Brown said it's "simply false" that he accepted a gift of travel. He called the travel "cultural outreach missions … paid for by the PC Party, approved by the PC Ontario Fund."

Brown's spokesperson tweeted Monday that a statement would be coming soon. It was unclear whether it would be in response to the integrity commissioner's probe.

The investigation comes amid the race for a new PC leader after Brown stepped down as a result of allegations of sexual misconduct.

Brown himself is one of five candidates seeking the top job. The others are Christine Elliott, Doug Ford, Caroline Mulroney and Tanya Granic Allen.

PC members will vote for their party's new leader between March 2 and 8. The winner will be announced on March 10.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/patrick-brown-pc-leadership-race-drops-out-1.4551928

Patrick Brown drops out of Ontario PC leadership race

39-year-old politician has been plagued by scandals since last month

By Amara McLaughlin, CBC News Posted: Feb 26, 2018 4:58 PM ET

Former Ontario PC leader Patrick Brown has dropped out of contention to lead the party into the June 7 provincial election. (Chris Young/Canadian Press)

Former Ontario PC leader Patrick Brown has ended his campaign to re-take the reins of the party heading into the June 7 provincial election, the party's chief electoral officer Hartley Lefton says.

The president of the Progressive Conservatives Jag Badwal and the leadership election organization committee received a letter from Brown announcing his withdrawal from the leadership race he triggered, Lefton said in a tweet late Monday afternoon.

Brown was forced to resign his leadership post late last month amid accusations of sexual misconduct by two women dating back to when he was a federal MP in the Barrie, Ont., area. He has "vehemently" denied the allegations since they were first made public in a report by CTV News and repeatedly said in statements posted to Facebook that important elements of the women's stories can be proven to be untrue.

In a four-page statement posted on Twitter shortly after the news he had dropped out of contention, Brown listed three key reasons for this decision, including:

A desire to focus on his case against CTV News.
Freeing up the PCs to focus on defeating the Liberals.
Protecting his family and friends.

"While I am discontinuing the pursuit of my goal to lead this great and proud party into government as our next premier, I remain steadfast in my love for Ontario and Canada," the statement read.

Interim leader Vic Fedeli applauded Brown, saying in a statement obtained by CBC Toronto: "I want to thank Patrick Brown for making the right decision for himself and the Ontario PC party. He is right to focus on clearing his name."

Caroline Mulroney, who is among four candidates vying for the Tory's top spot, echoed this, saying he made the right decision for the party.

"We only have a couple of weeks left in the leadership campaign, so myself and the other leadership candidates can focus on the issues that … party members want to talk about, and that's what I'm starting to do," she said at a campaign event in Burlington, Ont.

PCs focus on defeating Wynne

The 39-year-old MPP, who currently represents Simcoe North, shocked party insiders and political observers alike when he registered to run in the party's snap leadership race just hours before the deadline to do so expired.

His registration in the leadership race ignited a fractious internal battle between his grassroots supporters, caucus allies and the party's top brass.

New information raises questions about allegations against Patrick Brown

'You lied. You defamed me': Patrick Brown blasts CTV News after sexual misconduct accuser changes timeline

While Brown has maintained that he has substantial grassroots support, his short-lived campaign was plagued by scandals that have roiled the PCs just months before they challenge Wynne.

On Monday, Brown explained in a statement that his participation in the PC leadership race has "become a source of distraction from the real goal of replacing" the Liberals.

'I cannot allow my family to suffer this way'

In the few weeks between Brown's resignation and his announcement that he is dropping out of the race, he was booted from the PC caucus and became the target of a lengthy complaint — made by Conservative MPP Randy Hillier — to the province's integrity commissioner.

The complaint outlines accusations of "significant" financial and ethical impropriety and, in Hillier's words, "crooked and dirty politics" that breached the province's ethics rules.

The complaint questions how Brown could afford the mortgage on his $2.3-million house, alleging Brown violated the rules for MPPs by failing to declare all his sources of income.

Hillier also questioned how Brown paid for overseas trips, including travel with his girlfriend, who was a Queen's Park intern at the time. In his complaint, Hillier suggested some business people may have covered trip costs.

If history is any guide, Patrick Brown's comeback bid faces long odds

Patrick Brown cleared to run for Ontario PC leadership

In response to Hillier's complaint last week, Brown called the allegations "imaginary" and "make-believe."

Ontario's integrity commissioner confirmed Monday he is investigating that complaint.

As a result of this, Brown says his family and friends have come under fire "by a rogue MPP," adding the public spotlight of his leadership campaign has been "so hard on them."

"The guilt and pain in seeing them hurt because people want to come after me is indescribable," he wrote in a statement Monday. "I think Ontarians have seen by now that I am a fighter. I don't mind taking punches. I can deal with the attacks. But I cannot allow my family to suffer this way as a result of my own ambition to finish the job I started."

Challenging CTV News

Over the weekend, Brown sent a notice of libel to Bell Media, the parent company of CTV News alleging it engaged in "false, malicious, irresponsible and defamatory" reporting on its national newscast as well as its news website.

"I am a strong supporter of the #MeToo movement, but false allegations broadcast by the media diminish that movement and minimize the voices of women who come forward honestly and with pure intentions," Brown said on Monday.

"That could not be allowed to stand. It had to be challenged."

In mid-February, it was reported that one of the women, who alleges Brown asked her to perform oral sex on him, had revised some details of her story outlining her allegations against Brown.

CTV News originally said she was in high school and under the legal drinking age at the time when they met at a bar on the night in question, but later said she was in fact out of high school and was of legal drinking age.

"In the court of public opinion and among the many journalists I've spoken to, these allegations are now seen for what they are — fictitious and malicious," Brown wrote in a Facebook post when that revision was made public.

The woman's lawyer dismissed it as a "collateral matter" and said the accuser "stands by the truth of the core allegation." In his libel notice, Brown denies engaging in sexual misconduct or providing alcohol to someone under the age of 19. Brown is demanding an apology and retraction from CTV News.

In a brief statement issued early Saturday, CTV News acknowledged it has received the notice.
"CTV News stands by its reporting and will actively defend its journalism in court," it said.

Mulroney, Christine Elliott, Doug Ford and Tanya Granic Allen are running for the PC's top job.
PC members will vote for their party's new leader between March 2 and 8. The winner will be announced on March 10.

With files from Mike Crawley and Lucas Powers

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 18:52:04 -0400
Subject: Yo Randy Hillier I called your office and talked a guy who had to go to a meeting
Feel Free to enjoy this email and share it with anyone you wish Clearly I did
To: randy.hillierco@pc.ola.org, randy.hillier@pc.ola.org,
integrity.mail@oico.on.ca, info@oico.on.ca, ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca,
"Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, amara.mclaughlin@cbc.ca,
"Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, Premier@ontario.ca,
patrick.brown@pc.ola.org, vic.fedeli@pc.ola.org,
vic.fedelico@pc.ola.org
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

Methinks somebody should have a long talk with me ASAP N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2018/01/yo-bill-morneau-are-opposition-leaders.html

Friday, 19 January 2018
Yo Bill Morneau are the opposition leaders Patrick Brown and Andrea
Horwath even remotely concerned about the upcoming provincial
election?

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/patrick-brown-accused-of-dirty-politics-1.4543691

Patrick Brown accused of 'dirty and crooked politics' as Ontario MPP
calls for investigation
Randy Hillier files complaint alleging the ousted PC leader breached
the province's ethics rules
By Amara McLaughlin, CBC News Posted: Feb 20, 2018 8:57 PM ET

Randy Hillier- Contact Information
Queen's Park
Room 207, North Wing, Main Legislative Building, Queen's Park
Toronto, Ontario M7A 1A8
Tel 416-325-2244

randy.hillier@pc.ola.org

Constituency
Unit 1
105 Dufferin Street
Perth, Ontario K7H 3A5
Tel 613-267-8239
Fax 613-267-7398

randy.hillierco@pc.ola.org

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: ask tvo <asktvo@tvo.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 17:52:43 +0000
Subject: RE: Trust that TVO, Billy Morneau and the Mulroney lawyers
know why Tanya Granic Allen is the Lady I would like to see become the
next PC leader and everybody know I am NOT religious
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Dear David,
Thank you for contacting TVO.
We appreciate that you’ve taken the time to share this information
with us, I’ve shared it with the appropriate people.
Regards,

Nadine
Customer Relations

Help make the world a better place through the power of learning.
Donate today<http://support.tvo.org/site/PageServer?pagename=SupportTVO>.

[https://tvo.org/sites/default/files/media-library/TVO%20Logos/tvo-logo-crm-signature-384x72.png]

Good customer service is important to us at TVO. Please take a moment
to let us know whether or not you are satisfied with the level of
service provided by our Customer Relations Representative, by
completing this survey<http://survey.tvo.org/>.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/steve-paikin-tvo-third-party-sexual-harassment-1.4520028

TVO launches 3rd-party investigation into Steve Paikin over sexual
harassment allegations
Allegations date back to 2010 lunch
CBC News Posted: Feb 05, 2018 10:36 AM ET

The Ontario PC Leadership Debate
2,476 views
The Agenda with Steve Paikin
Published on Feb 15, 2018
The Ontario PC leadership is up for grabs. The Agenda welcomes the
candidates to debate the issue

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ThzTrGqENHA

Tanya Granic Allen Campaign
PO Box 40514, RPO Six Points Plaza
Etobicoke, ON M9B 6K8
Media Contact
Phone 905-459-0082
Email
campaign@tanyagranicallen.com

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 21:51:00 +0000
Subject: RE: Unbelieveable I actually agree with these Doug Draper and
Jack Gibbons characters and what they opt to publish while I was at
the NBEUB hearing yesterday and yet they think i am not worth talking
to just like the lawyers do?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 17:29:05 -0400
Subject: Unbelieveable I actually agree with these Doug Draper and
Jack Gibbons characters and what they opt to publish while I was at
the NBEUB hearing yesterday and yet they think i am not worth talking
to just like the lawyers do?
To: jack@cleanairalliance.org, drapers@vaxxine.com,
premier@ontario.ca, doug <doug@fordnation.ca>,
christine@christine2018.ca, info@fordforleader.ca,
ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca, Angela@cleanairalliance.org,
rsvp@jakeskinner.ca, media@christine2018.ca, newsroom
<newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, leblanc.daniel.m@gmail.com,
Dave.Young@nbeub.ca, twoolf@synapse-energy.com,
rzarumba@ceadvisors.com, rdk@indecon.com,
efinamore@valutechsolutions.com, patrick.brown@pc.ola.org,
"Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, paul.heroux@mcgill.ca,
chris_r_31@hotmail.com, wharrison <wharrison@nbpower.com>,
cstewart@stewartmckelvey.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "brian.gallant"
<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "rick.doucet" <rick.doucet@gnb.ca>, ecdesmond
<ecdesmond@nbeub.ca>, "Furey, John" <jfurey@nbpower.com>, sstoll
<sstoll@airdberlis.com>, hsegal <hsegal@airdberlis.com>, jtodd
<jtodd@elenchus.ca>, ddale <ddale@thestar.ca>, "darrow.macintyre"
<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>

Go Figure EH Dougy Ford?

http://www.nbeub.ca/opt/M/browserecord.php?-action=browse&-recid=560

Matter No. 0375

Title NB Power 2018-2019 General Rate Application / Énergie NB
Demande générale de tarifs pour 2018-2019

Description Electricity

Summary IN THE MATTER OF an application by New Brunswick
Power Corporation for approval of the schedules of the rates
for the fiscal year commencing April 1, 2018.

Status Open

https://niagaraatlarge.com/2018/02/13/when-will-the-light-come-on/

When Will The Light Come On?
Posted on February 13, 2018 by dougdraper | 2 Comments
Urge Ontario’s Party Leaders To Embrace a ‘Real Solution’ to Rising
Electricity Costs

A Call-Out from the Ontario Clean Air Alliance, a citizens advocacy
group in the province

Posted February 13th, 2018 on Niagara At Large

We are now just a few months away from a provincial election and we
know that rising electricity costs are sure to be a big issue on the
campaign trail. So why have none of the parties at Queen’s Park
embraced the real solution to lowering bills – buying power from
Quebec?

Quebec just signed a deal with Massachusetts to supply power at 3 to
5.5 cents per kWh. That’s less than one-third of the projected cost of
power from rebuilt reactors at the Darlington Nuclear Station. Yet our
leaders seem more interested in accounting tricks and finger pointing
than in grabbing Quebec’s sensational offer to make a similar deal
with Ontario.

Right now, all our leaders (and leadership candidates) seem to be
stumbling around in the dark on the electricity issue (with the
exception of the Green Party, which has called for a deal with
Quebec). To make a real difference for voters, they need to quickly
flip the switch from dangerous high cost nuclear to clean affordable
power from Quebec. Voters have had enough of non-solutions and the
blame game. Now it is time for real answers.

Please tell the leaders and leadership candidates that you want
answers, not empty promises.

Premier Kathleen Wynne: premier@ontario.ca
NDP Leader Andrea Horwath: ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca
PC Leadership candidate Christine Elliott: christine@christine2018.ca
PC Leadership candidate Doug Ford: info@fordforleader.ca
PC Leadership candidate Caroline Mulroney: christine@christine2018.ca

Thank you, Angela Bischoff, Director

P.S. We have sent the PC leadership candidates the following question:
“Should the Government of Ontario seek to negotiate a long-term
electricity supply contract with Hydro Quebec to lower our electricity
rates?” We’ll let you know what they have to say. Stay tuned.

Share this with your social media networks:

NIAGARA AT LARGE encourages you to join the conversation by sharing
your views on this post in the space below the Bernie quote.

A reminder that we only post comments by individuals who also share
their first and last names.

For more news and commentary from Niagara At Large – an independent,
alternative voice for our greater bi-national Niagara region – become
a regular visitor and subscriber to NAL at www.niagaraatlarge.com .

“A politician thinks of the next election. A leader thinks of the
next generation.” – Bernie Sanders

Jack Gibbons, Chair
Former Toronto Hydro Commissioner
(416) 260-2080, ext. 2
jack@cleanairalliance.org

Doug Draper
(905) 227-7951
32 Collier Rd N Thorold ON L2V 2X1

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Brown, Patrick" <patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:47:56 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn David Butt and Matthew Garrow I just
called from 902 800 0369
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you very much for getting in touch. Due to the large volume of
mail that I receive, please allow time for a response. If it is a
pressing issue, please call my Queen’s Park office at 416-325-3855.
Otherwise, I will respond as soon as possible.

Regards,

Patrick Brown, MPP
Simcoe North
Leader of the Official Opposition

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:22:57 -0400
Subject: Attn David Butt and Matthew Garrow I just called from 902 800 0369
To: dbutt@barristersatlaw.ca, matthew.garrow@bellmedia.ca,
"sylvie.gadoury" <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>, "ht.lacroix"
<ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "David.Akin"
<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, "patrick.brown" <patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>

Interesting news to say the least EH David Akin?

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/patrick-brown-blasts-ctv-news-1.4535358

'You lied. You defamed me': Patrick Brown blasts CTV News after sexual
misconduct accuser changes timeline
One of Brown's accusers now says she was wasn't underage at time of
alleged sexual misconduct
Amara McLaughlin · CBC News · Posted: Feb 14, 2018 2:45 PM ET |

"CTV 'stands by its reporting': spokesperson

Matthew Garrow, spokesperson for Bell Media, also responded to Brown's
Facebook post on Wednesday in an email to CBC News.

"CTV News continues to stand by its reporting," Garrow said.

"Patrick Brown's allegations regarding our reporting are false. As we
reported once again last night, the two women have reiterated their
allegations of sexual misconduct by Patrick Brown."

Matthew Garrow, Bell Media, 416-384-5258 or matthew.garrow@bellmedia.ca;

Mr Butt here is where I published the email I sent you last year

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2018/02/oh-my-my-little-lawyer-patrick-brown.html

There rest of this email should bring you up to date

>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:23:24 -0300
>> Subject: ATTN FBI Special Agent Richard Deslauriers Have you talked to
>> your buddies Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly about the wiretap tapes YET?
>> To: boston@ic.fbi.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
>> bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov,
>> jcarney@carneybassil.com, bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, birgittaj@althingi.is,
>> shmurphy@globe.com, redicecreations@gmail.com
>>
>> FBI Boston
>> One Center Plaza
>> Suite 600
>> Boston, MA 02108
>> Phone: (617) 742-5533
>> Fax: (617) 223-6327
>> E-mail: Boston@ic.fbi.gov
>>
>> Hours
>> Although we operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, our normal
>> "walk-in" business hours are from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
>> through Friday. If you need to speak with a FBI representative at any
>> time other than during normal business hours, please telephone our
>> office at (617) 742-5533.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300
>> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is
>> finally underway now correct? What the hell do I do with the wiretap
>> tapes Sell them on Ebay?
>> To: Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov,
>> Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney@carneybassil.com,
>> bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, wolfheartlodge@live.com, shmurphy@globe.com, >> jonathan.albano@bingham.com, mvalencia@globe.com
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>> PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov, rounappletree@aol.com
>>
>> http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/06/05/james-whitey-bulger-jury-selection-process-enters-second-day/KjS80ofyMMM5IkByK74bkK/story.html
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask
>> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly2006
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Amos" david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> To: "Rob Talach" rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM
>> Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing
>> the Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why
>>
>> The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should mean
>> a lot to you
>>
>> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:37:08 -0400
>> Subject: To Hell with the KILLER COP Gilles Moreau What say you NOW
>> Bernadine Chapman??
>> To: Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, phil.giles@statcan.ca,
>> maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca, Jennifer.Nixon@ps-sp.gc.ca,
>> bartman.heidi@psic-ispc.gc.ca, Yves.J.Marineau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> david.paradiso@erc-cee.gc.ca, desaulniea@smtp.gc.ca,
>> denise.brennan@tbs-sct.gc.ca, anne.murtha@vac-acc.gc.ca,
>> webo@xplornet.com, julie.dickson@osfi-bsif.gc.ca,
>> rod.giles@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, toewsv1@parl.gc.ca,
>> Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca,Clemet1@parl.gc.ca, maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca, >> oig@sec.gov, whistleblower@finra.org, whistle@fsa.gov.uk,
>> david@fairwhistleblower.ca
>> Cc: j.kroes@interpol.int, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
>> bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca,
>> Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>> Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca,
>> ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>
>> http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/nb/news-nouvelles/media-medias-eng.htm
>>
>> http://nb.rcmpvet.ca/Newsletters/VetsReview/nlnov06.pdf
>>
>> From: Gilles Moreau Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:03:22 -0500
>> Subject: Re: Lets ee if the really nasty Newfy Lawyer Danny Boy
>> Millions will explain this email to you or your boss Vic Toews EH
>> Constable Peddle???
>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Please cease and desist from using my name in your emails.
>>
>> Gilles Moreau, Chief Superintendent, CHRP and ACC
>> Director General
>> HR Transformation
>> 73 Leikin Drive, M5-2-502
>> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2
>>
>> Tel 613-843-6039
>> Cel 613-818-6947
>>
>> Gilles Moreau, surintendant principal, CRHA et ACC
>> Directeur général de la Transformation des ressources humaines
>> 73 Leikin, pièce M5-2-502
>> Ottawa, ON K1A 0R2
>>
>> tél 613-843-6039
>> cel 613-818-6947
>> gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 09:36:42 -0400
Subject: Yo Norman.Sabourin Need I say that the noname assistant of
your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong
Maritimer today?
To: "Norman.Sabourin" <Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca>,
david.d.smith@gnb.ca, "denis.landry2" <denis.landry2@gnb.ca>,
Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca, "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>,
"David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming"
<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "david.eidt" <david.eidt@gnb.ca>,
caroline.lafontaine@gnb.ca, crystal.critch@gnb.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, george.filliter@gnb.ca,
michael.bray@fosterandcompany.com, "Jacques.Poitras"
<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "Larry.Tremblay"
<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/chief-justice-retirement-1.4515502

New Brunswick chief justice announces retirement
J. Ernest Drapeau was appointed to the office in 2003
CBC News Posted: Feb 01, 2018 5:32 PM AT

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/david-smith-george-rideout-judge-transfer-letter-1.4515986

Sitting judge calls on chief justice to resign for defying transfer law
Chief Justice David Smith transferred a judge in December in a
challenge of new Judicature Act changes
By Jacques Poitras, CBC News Posted: Feb 02, 2018 4:00 AM AT

The Hon. George S. Rideout
Justice:
Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick
Moncton
Judges Chambers
145 Assumption Blvd.,
PO Box 5001, Stn. LCD 1
Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 8R3
Phone: 506-856-2301

Bell, Drapeau and Smith should have done the right thing LONG AGO

https://www.cjc-ccm.gc.ca/english/about_en.asp?selMenu=about_members_en.asp

New Brunswick
The Honourable Ernest Drapeau, Chief Justice of New Brunswick
The Honourable David D. Smith, Chief Justice of the Court of Queen's
Bench of New Brunswick

Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada
The Honourable B. Richard Bell, Chief Justice of the Court Martial
Appeal Court of Canada

Need I remind the Justice Dept that I am about to make an application to
the Supreme Court because of this wicked decision? Please enjoy

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html

Sunday, 19 November 2017

Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
The Supreme Court

https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do

Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Amos v. Canada
Court (s) Database

Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date

2017-10-30
Neutral citation

2017 FCA 213
File numbers

A-48-16
Date: 20171030

Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.

BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:

THE COURT

Date: 20171030

Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.

BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT

I. Introduction

[1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
(Claim at para. 96).

[2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
Prothontary’s Order).

[3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).

[4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
cross-appeal.

II. Preliminary Matter

[5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
several judges but did not name those judges.

[6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
c. F-7:

5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
Appeal.
[…]

5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
[…]
5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.

5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
juges de la Cour fédérale.

[7] However, these subsections only provide that the
judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
section.
[8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.

3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
matière civile et pénale.
4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.

4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
compétence en matière civile et pénale.

[9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
(section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
appeal book.

[10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
conflict in any matter related to him.

[11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.

[12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
such judge had a conflict.

[13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
was a member of such firm.

[14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
Court of Canada over 10 years ago.

[15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
“John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
[16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
apprehension of bias:
60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
reasonable apprehension of bias:
… the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
unconsciously, would not decide fairly."

[17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
(4th) 193).

[18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.

28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."

29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.

30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
his former firm for a considerable period of time.

32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
events from over a decade ago.
(emphasis added)

[19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
Webb hearing this appeal.

[20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
(2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.

[21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.

[22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.

[23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
to recuse himself.

[24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.

[25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.

III. Issue

[26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?

IV. Analysis

A. Standard of Review

[27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
[Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
(Hospira at paras. 82-83).

[28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
interfere.

B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
Prothonotary’s Order?

[29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:

17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
(…)

21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
[footnotes omitted].

[30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
para. 27).

[31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:

[13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:

a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;

b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and

c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
(Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).

[32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
“political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).

[33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:

…When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
“The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
of process…

To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
(at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).

[34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.

[35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
supporting a cause of action.

[36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).

V. Conclusion
[37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
without leave to amend.
"Wyman W. Webb"
J.A.
"David G. Near"
J.A.
"Mary J.L. Gleason"
J.A.

FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
DOCKET:

A-48-16

STYLE OF CAUSE:

DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

PLACE OF HEARING:

Fredericton,
New Brunswick

DATE OF HEARING:

May 24, 2017

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.

DATED:

October 30, 2017

APPEARANCES:
David Raymond Amos

For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
(on his own behalf)

Jan Jensen

For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Nathalie G. Drouin
Deputy Attorney General of Canada

For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/12/attn-simon-fish-of-bmo-and-robert.html

Thursday, 21 December 2017

Attn Simon Fish of the BMO and Robert Kennedy of Dentons I just called
from 902 800 0369 Play dumb all you wish The BMO has had my documents
for years

https://www.scribd.com/document/367699089/The-Scotia-Bank-and-The-Bank-of-Montreal

https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/integrity-yea-right

While I was publishing this in my blog the lawyer Bobby Baby Kennedy called
back from (416) 846-6598 and played as dumb. Hell he even claimed that he
did not know who Frank McKenna was No partner even a lowly collection
dude within Dentons is allowed to be THAT stupid.

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To: coi@gnb.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>
> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>
> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>
>
> The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
> dudes are way past too late
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Thank you,
>
> Merci ,
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>
>
> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>
> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>
> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> campaign of 2006.
>
> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>
> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>
> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>
> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>
> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. $DH/MS$" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
>
> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:35 AM
> Subject: RE My complaint against the CROWN in Federal Court Attn David
> Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to submit a motion for a
> publication ban on my complaint trust that you dudes are way past too late
> To: David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca, peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca
> peacock.kurt@telegraphjournal.com, mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com,
> david.akin@sunmedia.ca, robert.frater@justice.gc.ca, paul.riley@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca,
> greg@gregdelbigio.com, joyce.dewitt-vanoosten@gov.bc.ca,
> joan.barrett@ontario.ca, jean-vincent.lacroix@gouv.qc.ca,
> peter.rogers@mcinnescooper.com
, mfeder@mccarthy.ca, mjamal@osler.com
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, gopublic@cbc.ca,
> Whistleblower@ctv.ca
>
> https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/14439/index.do
>
> http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/WebDocuments-DocumentsWeb/35072/FM030_Respondent_Attorney-General-of-Canada-on-Behalf-of-the-United-States-of-America.pdf
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html
>
> I repeat what the Hell do I do with the Yankee wiretapes taps sell
> them on Ebay or listen to them and argue them with you dudes in
> Feferal Court?
>
> Petey Baby loses all parliamentary privelges in less than a month but
> he still supposed to be an ethical officer of the Court CORRECT?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:10:14 -0400
> Subject: Yo Mr Bauer say hey to your client Obama and his buddies in
> the USDOJ for me will ya?
> To: RBauer@perkinscoie.com, sshimshak@paulweiss.com,
> cspada@lswlaw.com, msmith@svlaw.com, bginsberg@pattonboggs.com,
> gregory.craig@skadden.com, pm@pm.gc.ca, bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca
> Cc: alevine@cooley.com, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
> michael.rothfeld@wsj.com, remery@ecbalaw.com
>
> QSLS Politics
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 29,419
> Domain Name usdoj.gov ? (U.S. Government)
> IP Address 149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice)
> ISP US Dept of Justice
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : United States (Facts)
> State : District of Columbia
> City : Washington
> Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
> CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2;
> DI60SP1001)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
> Last Page View Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.google.co...wwWJrm94lCEqRmovPXJg
> Search Engine google.com
> Search Words david amos bernie madoff
> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time Nov 17 2012 12:33:08 pm
> Visit Number 29,419
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html
>
>
> Could ya tell I am investigating your pension plan bigtime? Its
> because no member of the RCMP I have ever encountered has earned it yet
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:36:04 -0400
> Subject: This is a brief as I can make my concerns Randy
> To: randyedmunds@gov.nl.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> In a nutshell my concerns about the actions of the Investment Industry
> affect the interests of every person in every district of every
> country not just the USA and Canada. I was offering to help you with
> Emera because my work with them and Danny Williams is well known and
> some of it is over eight years old and in the PUBLIC Record.
>
> All you have to do is stand in the Legislature and ask the MInister of
> Justice why I have been invited to sue Newfoundland by the
> Conservatives
>
>
> Obviously I am the guy the USDOJ and the SEC would not name who is the
> link to Madoff and Putnam Investments
>
> Here is why
>
> http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=90f8e691-9065-4f8c-a465-72722b47e7f2
>
> Notice the transcripts and webcasts of the hearing of the US Senate
> Banking Commitee are still missing? Mr Emory should at least notice
> Eliot Spitzer and the Dates around November 20th, 2003 in the
> following file
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf
>
> http://occupywallst.org/users/DavidRaymondAmos/
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Hansen, David" David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 19:28:44 +0000
> Subject: RE: I just called again Mr Hansen
> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Hello Mr. Amos,
>
> I manage the Justice Canada civil litigation section in the Atlantic
> region. We are only responsible for litigating existing civil
> litigation files in which the Attorney General of Canada is a named
> defendant or plaintiff. If you are a plaintiff or defendant in an
> existing civil litigation matter in the Atlantic region in which
> Attorney General of Canada is a named defendant or plaintiff please
> provide the court file number, the names of the parties in the action
> and your question. I am not the appropriate contact for other
> matters.
>
> Thanks
>
> David A. Hansen
> Regional Director | Directeur régional
> General Counsel |Avocat général
> Civil Litigation and Advisory | Contentieux des affaires civiles et
> services de consultation
> Department of Justice | Ministère de la Justice
> Suite 1400 – Duke Tower | Pièce 1400 – Tour Duke
> 5251 Duke Street | 5251 rue Duke
> Halifax, Nova Scotia | Halifax, Nouvelle- Écosse
> B3J 1P3
> david.hansen@justice.gc.ca
> Telephone | Téléphone (902) 426-3261 / Facsimile | Télécopieur (902)
> 426-2329
> This e-mail is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client
> privilege. Unauthorized distribution or disclosure is prohibited. If
> you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us and delete
> this entire e-mail.
> Before printing think about the Environment
> Thinking Green, please do not print this e-mail unless necessary.
> Pensez vert, svp imprimez que si nécessaire.
>
>

---------- Original message ----------
From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 21:04:23 +0000
Subject: Re: Before the Next Yankee election methinks folks in
Massachusetts may pay attention to my recent posting in CBC of my talk
about their Pirate Party and the Election in Iceland to the ERRE
Committee of the Canadian Parliament in October of 2016
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received

Kveðja / Best regards
Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office

---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 21:03:34 +0000
Subject: RE: Before the Next Yankee election methinks folks in
Massachusetts may pay attention to my recent posting in CBC of my talk
about their Pirate Party and the Election in Iceland to the ERRE
Committee of the Canadian Parliament in October of 2016
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 17:03:13 -0400
Subject: Before the Next Yankee election methinks folks in
Massachusetts may pay attention to my recent posting in CBC of my talk
about their Pirate Party and the Election in Iceland to the ERRE
Committee of the Canadian Parliament in October of 2016
To: press@masspirates.org, postur <postur@for.is>, smari
<smari@immi.is>, smarim <smarim@althingi.is>, smaher
<smaher@postmedia.com>, "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
"andrew.scheer" <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau"
<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>,
"Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, David Amos
<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Cc: maltpoet@gmail.com, Joseph.P.Onoroski@gmail.com,
srevilak@masspirates.org, msukin11@gmail.com, jokeefe@jamesokeefe.org,
noeseek@gmail.com

---------- Original message ----------
From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2016 19:30:11 +0000
Subject: Re: Re Federal Court file no T-1557-15 Methinks that the
Pirates and even your minions in the RCMP, CSIS, and their pals in CSE
FBI, NSA, DHS and INTERPOL made fun the last of "Barrett's Privateers"
for way past too long EH Mr Minister Rotten Ralpy Goodale?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received

Kveðja / Best regards
Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office

https://archive.org/details/foia-for-fun-and-liberation

FOIA For Fun and Liberation
by Massachusetts Pirate Party

Publication date 2016-06-25
Usage http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
Topics Massachusetts, Public Records, Secretary of the Commonwealth, FOIA
Language English
Maya Shaffer is a reporter for the Bay State Examiner, and someone
who's used Massachusetts public records law enough to know it inside
and out. This is a great talk, where Maya tells her stories of public
records requesters in Massachusetts. Highlights include:

The time Maya made an in-person FOIA request to NEMLEC -- the
Northeastern Massachusetts Law Enforcement Council. NEMLEC wasn't
sure how to respond to an in-person request, so they called 911.
An agency proposed a $400 fee to process a public records request.
The agency takes the $400, but never produces the records.
How the city of Boston wanted to charge $10,000 to produce emails
between the city, and the Massachusetts Municipal Association
How Massachusetts public records laws aren't "real laws", in the
sense that they're routinely violated, and the violating party is
never punished.
The level of apathy and disdain that the Secretary of the
Commonwealth has for Massachusetts public records laws.
The really neat things you can find out, if you manage to get your
public records request fulfilled.

Maya's talk was record on June 25, 2016, during PirateCon 2016.

Identifier foia-for-fun-and-liberation
Scanner Internet Archive HTML5 Uploader 1.6.3
Taped by Steve Revilak
Year 2016

http://www.baystateexaminer.com/about/

https://twitter.com/masspirates/with_replies

https://masspirates.org/blog/about/

The Massachusetts Pirate Party was formed in May, 2010 by James
O’Keefe, Chris Reynolds and Erik Zoltan. We are active in promoting
privacy, transparent government, and innovation by reining in
copyright laws and eliminating patent laws. We ran candidates for
State Representative in 2014 and 2016 and elected our first office
holder in 2015.

Pirate Council

Captain – James O’Keefe / jokeefe@jamesokeefe.org / 617-447-0210 /
@jpokeefe / Key Id: 0xAAFF1FEC
First Officer – Noelani Kamelamela / noeseek@gmail.com / 617-901-4076
/ Key Id: 0x358758A8
Quartermaster – Joseph Onoroski / Joseph.P.Onoroski@gmail.com
PR/Media Director – Open
Activism Director – Sam Capradae / maltpoet@gmail.com
Swarmwise Director – Open
Web/Info Director – Open

Council of Arbitrators

Steve Revilak / srevilak@masspirates.org / 781-648-1083 /
@Purple_Bandanna / Key Id: 0x28C2A300
Moses Sukin / msukin11@gmail.com / 585-748-9347
Sam Capradae / maltpoet@gmail.com

Representative to the United States Pirate Party

Sam Capradae / maltpoet@gmail.com
Joseph Onoroski / Joseph.P.Onoroski@gmail.com

To contact us, please email press@masspirates.org or call/txt us at
(617) 863-6277.

Press distribution

If you would like to receive Pirate Party press releases, email
press@masspirates.org and we will add you to our press list.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-electoral-reform-january-2018-1.4511902

A year later, Trudeau will only revisit electoral reform if pushed by
other parties — something MPs don't buy
PM says proportional representation would divide MPs, be harmful to Canadians
By Elise von Scheel, CBC News Posted: Feb 01, 2018 11:53 AM ET

482 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.

bill chagwich
bill chagwich
YES FOLKS, I was elected to help you,but to my own interest electoral
reform will not work for me or my voter base, therefore take my
promise and kinda forget about it,

the honorable Justin Trudeau
better know as what I promise means nothing,just a election plot

bill chagwich
bill chagwich
@bill chagwich we all know what this is all about,CAMPAIGNING on the
middle class tax payers dime
Darryl McBride
Darryl McBride
@bill chagwich

Reinforcing, how can one have credibility with no ethics.
David Amos
David Amos
@bill chagwich
Friday, October 7, 2016 Friday, Oct. 7, 2016
Electoral Reform Meeting 39

The Chair:
Thank you very much.
Mr. David Amos, the floor is yours.

Mr. David Amos (As an Individual):
Mr. Chair, I ran for public office five times against your party.

That said, I ran against Mr. DeCourcey's boss right here in
Fredericton in the election for the 39th Parliament.

I was not aware of this committee meeting in Fredericton today until
I heard Mr. DeCourcey speaking on CBC this morning. I don't pretend
to know something I don't, but I'm a quick study. I thought I
had paid my dues to sit on the panel. I notified the clerks in a
timely fashion, but I received no response. At least I get another
minute and a half.

The previous speaker answered the $64,000 question: 338. I can name
every premier in the country. Governor Maggie Hassan is my governor
in New Hampshire. The people there who sit in the house get paid $100
a year plus per diem expenses. I think that's the way to run a
government. There are lots of seats in the house for a very small
state.

My understanding of this hearing is that you have to report to Mr.
Trudeau by December 1, because he said during the election that if he
were elected Prime Minister, the 42nd Parliament, which I also ran in,
would be the last first-past-the-post election. You don't have much
time, so my suggestion to the clerks today, which I published and sent
to the Prime Minister of Iceland and his Attorney General, was to do
what Iceland does. Just cut and paste their rules. They have no first
past the post. They have a pending election.
David Amos
David Amos
@David Amos
A former friend of mine, Birgitta Jónsdóttir, founded a
party there, for which there is no leader. It is the Pirate Party.
It's high in the polls right now with no leader. That's interesting. I
tweeted this. You folks said that you follow tweets, so you should
have seen what I tweeted before I came here this evening.

That said, as a Canadian, I propose something else. Number
one, my understanding of the Constitution and what I read about
law.... There was a constitutional expert named Edgar Schmidt who sued
the government. He was the man who was supposed to vet bills for Peter
MacKay to make sure they were constitutionally correct. He did not
argue the charter. He argued Mr. Diefenbaker's Bill of Rights.

In 2002 I read a document filed by a former deputy minister
of finance, Kevin Lynch, who later became Mr. Harper's clerk of the
Privy Council. Now he's on an independent board of the Chinese oil
company that bought Nexen. As deputy minister of finance, he reported
to the American Securities and Exchange Commission on behalf of the
corporation known as Canada. It is a very interesting document that I
saved and forwarded to you folks. It says that he was in a quandary
about whether the charter was in effect.
(2005)
David Amos
David Amos
@David Amos

The Chair:
Could it be in relation to a particular voting system?

Mr. David Amos:
According to Mr. Lynch, because of the failure of the Meech Lake and
Charlottetown accords, he was in a quandary as to whether the charter
was in effect. I know that the Supreme Court argues it on a daily
basis. That charter, created by Mr. Trudeau and Mr. Chrétien, his
attorney general at the time, gave me the right to run for public
office and vote as a Canadian citizen. However, in the 1990s, Mr.
Chrétien came out with a law, and because I am a permanent American
resident, I can't vote. Yet the charter says I can.

The Chair:
That's a—

Mr. David Amos:
That said, that's been argued in court. In 2000, Mr. Chrétien came out
with a law that said I couldn't vote. Right? He also took away my
social insurance number.

The Chair:
I don't know about the case—

Mr. David Amos:
No, he did.

The Chair:
But I don't know about the case.

Mr. David Amos:
I did prove, after I argued with Elections Canada's lawyers in
2004.... You might have taken away my right to vote, but you can't
stop me from running for public office, and I proved it five times.

The Chair:
Given that you're an experienced candidate—

Mr. David Amos:
Very experienced.

The Chair:
—does that experience provide you with a particular insight on the
voting systems we're looking at?

Mr. David Amos:
In Mr. Trudeau's words, he has to come up with a plan and no more
first past the post. My suggestion to you, in my contact today, is to
cut and paste Iceland's rules.
David Amos
David Amos
@David Amos
The Chair:
What kind of system does Iceland have?

Mr. David Amos:
It's just what you need, just what Mr. Trudeau is ordering now. It's
proportional elections.

The Chair:
Is it MMP, or is it just...?

Mr. David Amos:
I tweeted you the beginner's book for Iceland.

The Chair:
Okay, we'll look at Iceland.
We're just checking on the kind of system they have, but I appreciate
the input, especially from a candidate, from somebody who has run many
times.
But we do have—

Mr. David Amos:
I have two other points, because I don't think you can pull this off.
I don't think it will happen.

The Chair:
Well, I'm hoping we do.

Mr. David Amos:
Here is my suggestion. You guys are going north.

The Chair:
Yes.

Mr. David Amos:
Look how parliamentarians are elected in the Northwest
Territories. There is no party, and I like that.

The Chair:
That's true. We were just up in Yellowknife, in fact, and we learned
all about that. That's why it's good for us to be travelling the
country.
But, sir, I—

Mr. David Amos:
I have one more suggestion.

The Chair:
One more.

Mr. David Amos:
Mr. Harper changed the Canada Elections Act and I still couldn't vote.

The Chair:
Yes, I was in the House when that happened.

David Amos
David Amos
@David Amos
Mr. David Amos:
Anyway, that said, when you alter the Canada Elections Act, make it....
The biggest problem we have is, look at the vast majority of people
who, like me, have never voted in their life. Apathy rules the day.

The Chair:
Except that you've put us on to an idea about Iceland—

Mr. David Amos:
Let me finish.
I suggest that you make voting mandatory, such as Australia does. Make
it that if you don't vote, it costs you money, just like if you don't
report to Statistics Canada.

The Chair:
Well, we're talking about that. That is part of our mandate, to look
at mandatory voting and online voting.
You already had your last suggestion.
(2010)

Mr. David Amos:
Put in the line, “none of the above”, and if “none of the above” wins—

The Chair:
That's right, we've heard that, too.

Mr. David Amos:
Well, I haven't.

The Chair:
We've heard that in our testimony.

Mr. David Amos:
You and I will be talking again, trust me on that one, by way of writing.
You answered my emails, Ma'am.

The Chair:
Thank you very much, sir.
Now we'll hear from Julie Maitland.

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)" <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:02:29 +0000
Subject: RE: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the no-name assistant
of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong
Maritimer today?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be
assured that your email will be reviewed.

If this is a media request, please forward your email to
media-medias@gnb.camedia-medias@gnb.ca
>. Thank you!

*************************************

Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné.

Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à
media-medias@gnb.camedia-medias@gnb.ca>. Merci!

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Critch, Crystal (JPS/JSP)" <Crystal.Critch@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:02:29 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the
no-name assistant of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just
pissed of the wrong Maritimer today?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Veuillez prendre note que je serai hors du bureau jusqu'au 5 février
2018. En cas d'urgence, veuillez communiquer avec la réception au 506
453-4230.

Please note that I am out of the office until February 5, 2018. In
case of emergency, please contact reception at 506 453-4230.

thank you/merci,

Crystal Critch

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Jensen, Jan" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:02:23 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the
no-name assistant of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just
pissed of the wrong Maritimer today?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I will be out of office and will have limited email access until I
return on Monday, February 5th, 2018. If you require immediate
assistance, please contact my assistant at (902) 426 1798.

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Fitch, Leanne" <leanne.fitch@fredericton.ca>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:02:24 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the
no-name assistant of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just
pissed of the wrong Maritimer today?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Due to a very high volume of incoming email to this account there is
an unusual backlog of pending responses. Your query may not be
responded to in a timely fashion. If you require a formal response
please send your query in writing to my attention c/o Fredericton
Police Force, 311 Queen St, Fredericton, NB E3B 1B1 or phone (506)
460-2300.

This e-mail communication (including any or all attachments) is
intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If
you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any use, review,
retransmission, distribution, dissemination, copying, printing, or
other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this e-mail, is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
contact the sender and delete the original and any copy of this e-mail
and any printout thereof, immediately. Your co-operation is
appreciated.

Any correspondence with elected officials, employees, or other agents
of the City of Fredericton may be subject to disclosure under the
provisions of the Province of New Brunswick Right to Information and
Protection of Privacy Act.

Le présent courriel (y compris toute pièce jointe) s'adresse
uniquement à son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou un
organisme, et pourrait comporter des renseignements privilégiés ou
confidentiels. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire du courriel, il est
interdit d'utiliser, de revoir, de retransmettre, de distribuer, de
disséminer, de copier ou d'imprimer ce courriel, d'agir en vous y
fiant ou de vous en servir de toute autre façon. Si vous avez reçu le
présent courriel par erreur, prière de communiquer avec l'expéditeur
et d'éliminer l'original du courriel, ainsi que toute copie
électronique ou imprimée de celui-ci, immédiatement. Nous sommes
reconnaissants de votre collaboration.

Toute correspondance entre ou avec les employés ou les élus de la
Ville de Fredericton pourrait être divulguée conformément aux
dispositions de la Loi sur le droit à l’information et la protection
de la vie privée.

GOV-OP-073

---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:02:26 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the
no-name assistant of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just
pissed of the wrong Maritimer today?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>

Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com

This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.

---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:02:27 +0000
Subject: RE: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the no-name assistant
of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong
Maritimer today?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 12:02:19 -0400
Subject: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the no-name assistant of
your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong
Maritimer today?
To: "Norman.Sabourin" <Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca>,
david.d.smith@gnb.ca, "denis.landry2" <denis.landry2@gnb.ca>,
Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca, "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>,
"David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming"
<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "david.eidt" <david.eidt@gnb.ca>,
caroline.lafontaine@gnb.ca, crystal.critch@gnb.ca,
george.filliter@gnb.ca, michael.bray@fosterandcompany.com,
"Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "Larry.Tremblay"
<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, nbpc
<nbpc@gnb.ca>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch
<jbosnitch@gmail.com>, newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>,
"martin.gaudet" <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, "Leanne.Fitch"
<Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>, "marc.giroux"
<marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>,
"bill.pentney" <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
George.S.Rideout@gnb.ca, Danielle.Elliott@gnb.ca, "Dominic.Cardy"
<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc"
<Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca>, "Bill.Morneau"
<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2018/02/yo-norman-sabourin-need-i-say-that-no.html

Friday, 2 February 2018

Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the no-name assistant of your buddy
Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong Maritimer today?

The Crown Corp commonly known as the CBC is telling us some interesting
tales lately while Google continues to blog my long emails. However there
is mre than one way to skin a cat and use Google's resources to do so EH?

Methinks that as Drapeau quits and his questionable buddy Rideout
takes on the boss on Premier Gallant's behalf while he tries to buy
the next election things are becoming incredibly comical within the
justice system and the political scene of the LIEbrano so called "Place
to Be" N'esy Pas?

In my humble opinion Justices Drapeau and Smith and Bell in particular
should have done the right thing to see justice served on my Clan's behalf
LONG AGO if only because of their positions on the Canadian Judicial
Council but what do I know I am just the dumb Maritimer you have been
ignoring since 2005 CORRECT Norman Sabourin?

https://www.cjc-ccm.gc.ca/english/about_en.asp?selMenu=about_members_en.asp

New Brunswick
The Honourable Ernest Drapeau, Chief Justice of New Brunswick
The Honourable David D. Smith, Chief Justice of the Court of Queen's
Bench of New Brunswick

Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada
The Honourable B. Richard Bell, Chief Justice of the Court Martial
Appeal Court of Canada

Anyway the no-name lady I talked to again today Justice Smith's office
certainly remember me and recalled getting the email fund below. Hence
methinks I should take a guess at Justice George S. Rideout's email address
and call him next to see if he even knows who I am like Cst Rideout of the
Fat Fred City Finest (badge # 127) did in on a rainy night in front of the
RCMP HQ in April of 2007 You dudes call them Yellow Stripers
N'esy Pas Martin Gaudet and Leanne Fitch?

The Hon. George S. Rideout
Justice:
Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick
Moncton
Judges Chambers
145 Assumption Blvd.,
PO Box 5001, Stn. LCD 1
Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 8R3
Phone: 506-856-2301

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:13:56 -0400
Subject: Attn Judge David Smith
To: david.d.smith@gnb.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

The Hon. David D. Smith
Chief Justice (Moncton):
Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick
Moncton
Judges Chambers
145 Assumption Blvd.,
PO Box 5001, Stn. LCD 1
Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 8R3
Phone: 506-856-2300
Fax: 506-856-2751
Email: david.d.smith@gnb.ca

It was quite a wicked email and everybody knows that I published it
within my blog long ago

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2016/06/there-is-no-need-for-judge-david-smiths.html

Thursday, 23 June 2016

There is no need for Judge David Smith's lawyer, Michael Bray to be in
a quandary In My humble opinion Federal Court has the proper
jurisdiction to hear his complaint against the CROWN

Now we have the news that CBC offers us today N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc
and Andre Faust?

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 20:43:37 -0400
Subject: Hey Jason tell Sam Sutter I just called (508) 491-1025 and
tried to leave a voicemail but a woman picked up and asked me my
business and I would not tell her
To: JASON@resminilaw.com, info@jhcom.net
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

Call us : 401.831.6123 Mail us : info@jhcom.net

Former Fall River Mayor Will Not Pursue Mayoral Bid in 2017

Providence, RI (July 26th, 2017) – The Law Offices of Ronald J.
Resmini has added a new attorney, Sam Sutter, Esq., to their expanding
team. An experienced and well-known practicing attorney since 1984,
Mr. Sutter will be focusing on expanding the firm’s growing clientele
in Bristol County. In accepting the position at the firm, Mr. Sutter
has decided to forgo a run for Mayor of Fall River this November.

“I am pleased to have Mr. Sutter join our team,” says Ronald J.
Resmini, Founder of the Law Offices of Ronald J. Resmini, “His
reputation speaks for itself and he will be an invaluable asset to our
firm. In addition to his tremendous legal experience, Sam has always
fought for what he believes in – this dedication will serve our
clients well as he advocates on their behalf.”

Prior to joining the Law Offices of Ronald J. Resmini, Mr. Sutter
spent the first 7 years of his in private practice on Cape Cod. In
1991, he went on to work as an assistant district attorney in the
Bristol County District Attorney’s Office. He then received the
Prosecutor of the Year award from Mothers Against Drunk Driving in
1992. He was promoted to Superior Court in 1995, where he spent 4
years handling major felony cases. During this time, he tried eighteen
Superior Court cases to verdict and won sixteen of them. In 2006, Mr.
Sutter was successfully elected Bristol County District Attorney, and
was awarded the Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Lawyer of the Year award.

Sutter is eager to put his decades of experience to work for the
clients of Ronald J. Resmini, stating: “I went to law school to make a
positive difference in people’s lives. I knew that someday I would
come back to practicing law. This opportunity has come along at just
the right time in my life. I was looking for the right partnership
and once I started talking to the Resmini’s I knew I had found the
right team.”

Once elected District Attorney, Mr. Sutter served for a total of 8
years leading the Bristol County District Attorney’s office. He began
his second term in 2010 and that same month became president of the
Massachusetts District Attorney’s Association. After a special
election in 2014, Sutter served as Mayor of Fall River for one year
and returned to private practice in 2016 concentrating in personal
injury. Mr. Sutter resides in Fall River with his wife, Dorothy.

About the Law Offices of Ronald J. Resmini

The Law Offices of Ronald J. Resmini is a personal injury law firm
serving all of Rhode Island and Massachusetts with offices in
Providence, RI and Seekonk, MA. The firm celebrated 45 years of
practicing law in 2015. Mr. Resmini is nationally recognized for his
expertise in uninsured motorist cases and has authored more than
twenty RI Law Institute handbooks on Personal Injury Law, Product
Liability, Trial and Settlement Practice, Domestic Relations and other
litigation topics.

For more information, please visit www.resminilawoffices.com or call
401.444.4444.

https://www.resminilawoffices.com/attorneys/sam-sutter-esq/

Law Offices of Ronald J. Resmini, LTD.
local 401.751.8855
Available 24/7
Attorney

Meet Sam Sutter, Esq

Sam Sutter graduated from Brown University in 1976. At Brown, he
played for the collegiate varsity tennis team and compiled the best
singles record on the team. Following his undergraduate career, Mr.
Sutter spent the next three years traveling to fifteen different
countries, teaching tennis professionally and playing in professional
tournaments. Following his travels, Mr. Sutter started law school at
Vanderbilt University School of Law and graduated in 1983.

The first seven years of his career, Mr. Sutter was in private
practice on Cape Cod, concentrating in criminal defense. Beginning in
January of 1991, he then went to work as an assistant district
attorney in the Bristol County District Attorney’s Office. He spent
four years prosecuting cases in the district court and tried over two
hundred cases. In 1992, he received the Prosecutor of the Year award
from Mothers against Drunk Driving and the organization featured him
in their national publication. In 1995, he was promoted to Superior
Court, and he spent the next four years handling major felony cases.
During this time, Mr. Sutter tried eighteen Superior Court cases to
verdict and won sixteen of them.

In 1999, he returned to private practice to concentrate on personal
injury and criminal defense. The next year, he began giving free
tennis clinics to the Fall River youth and taught several hundred kids
in Fall River how to play the game over the next seven years. For his
contribution to the local community, the Fall River Herald News named
Sam Sutter Coach of the Year in 2005. In 2006, due to an upsurge in
gun violence, gang activity, and unsolved homicide cases, he ran for
District Attorney against a sixteen-year incumbent who had close to a
million dollars in his campaign account. He won the election against
the odds. For his upset victory, Mr. Sutter won the Massachusetts
Lawyers Weekly Lawyer of the Year award in 2006.

For the next eight years, he served the people of Bristol County as
their District Attorney and led an office that made great progress in
reducing gun violence and decreasing gang activity, solving cold
cases, and promoting the rights of victims. Mr. Sutter also rece...

[Message clipped] View entire message

1 comment:

Dr Ogudugu Solution Temple29 October 2018 at 16:23
Hello,

I'm Dr Ogudugu, a real and genuine spell caster/Spiritual healer with years of experience in spell casting and an expert in all spells, i specialize exclusively in LOVE SPELL/GET REUNITE WITH EX LOVER, MONEY SPELL, POWERFUL MAGIC RING, ANY COURT CASES, FRUIT OF THE WOMB, HIV CURE, CURE FOR CANCER, HERPES, DIABETE, HERPERTITIS B, PARKINSON’S HERBAL CURE, BECOMING A MERMAID, BECOMING A VAMPIRE, SAVE CHILD BIRTH. They are all %100 Guaranteed QUICK Results, it most work. If you have any problem and you need a real and genuine spell caster to solve your problems, contact me now through my personal Email Address with problem case...Note-you can also Text/Call on WhatsApp.

Contact me -
Email: greatogudugu@gmail.com
WhatsApp No: +27663492930

David Raymond Amos Round 3

Monday, 26 February 2018

Patrick Brown drops out of Ontario PC leadership race Yea Right and we all know why N'esy Pas?

22 Minutes: Morneau Budget Interview

Ontario integrity commissioner investigating complaint against Patrick Brown

MPP Randy Hillier lodged complaint last week, alleging Brown failed to declare all of his income sources

Ontario integrity commissioner investigating complaint against Patrick Brown

MPP Randy Hillier lodged complaint last week, alleging Brown failed to declare all of his income sources

Patrick Brown drops out of Ontario PC leadership race

39-year-old politician has been plagued by scandals since last month

PCs focus on defeating Wynne

'I cannot allow my family to suffer this way'

Challenging CTV News

1 comment: