Conservatives launch massive ad campaign amid surge in polls
Multimillion-dollar ad buy comes as polling shows Tories as much as 10 points ahead of Liberals
"This is not a branding campaign. This is an amplification of who Pierre is and always has been," said Regan Watts, a former adviser to several ministers in the Harper government.
"He's warm, he's kind, he's empathetic and he listens… It's important for people to delineate between Parliament Hill and the rest of the country, engaging with Canadians one-on-one. "
Two of the three ads focus on showing a more human side of Poilievre, whose aggressive, bulldog style has seen him spar with journalists and politicians alike, prompting Maclean's magazine to ask "Why is Pierre Poilievre so angry?"
A senior Conservative source confirmed to CBC News that the party will spend more than $3 million over three months to push three bilingual ads in every province and territory.
The ads will air on TV, radio, digital platforms and print media.
Polling analyst Éric Grenier, the author of TheWrit.ca, says the timing of the campaign makes sense.
"Usually when there is a new leader in place and Canadians don't know a lot about them, there is an attempt to try to make them seem more like a likable person," he said.
The first ad features voice-over from Poilievre's wife, Anaida, a Montreal-raised Venezuelan immigrant who has been described in a Quebec newspaper as Poilievre's "hidden ace" in Quebec.
"Who is Pierre Poilievre?" she narrates, before showing the Conservative leader at different stages of his life, including playing hockey while growing up in Calgary, and playing with his own children.
"And I know him as a guy who loves me for who I am," she says in the ad. "A Canadian, who came to call Canada home, and his wife."
It was released less than a week after Justin Trudeau's high-profile separation from his wife, Sophie Grégoire Trudeau.
The second ad shows Poilievre sitting with his son, doing a puzzle.
"Everything feels broken in Canada. Unaffordable, unsafe, divided. But we can put the pieces back together," he says in voice-over.
The third ad is an attack on the carbon tax, which Poilievre says he would undo if elected.
A spokesperson for Poilievre did not respond to a request for comment about the ad campaign.
A surge in polls
This ad campaign comes while the party surges in the polls.
"All the national polling that we've seen over the last few months have given the Conservatives a wide lead, sometimes as wide as 10 points, and that has increased over the last few months," Grenier said.
"The question is whether it's going to hold into the fall."
It also comes weeks after he ditched his tie and glasses for a more casual look, which some strategists say could signal an effort to present a more laid-back, likable version of himself.
These ads could be an appeal to women — a key demographic Conservatives are trying to court, says Grenier.
"The Conservatives in general poll less well among women than they do among men… For Pierre Poilievre, we've seen the same kinds of things. Negatives tend to be a lot higher among women than among men," he said.
"This is a way to make him seem less abrasive, less partisan."
Canada's Transport Minister Pablo Rodriguez was asked about the new ad campaign and said he doesn't believe the ads will sway people, particularly in his home province of Quebec.
"You can change the packaging if you want, you can change the packaging, but not the contents," he said. "The content is not something that Quebecers want."
'Money to burn'
Though the $3-million price tag might seem expensive, the Conservative Party of Canada is out-fundraising its rivals — by a lot.
From April to June alone, the Tories raised nearly $8 million in donations, a slight decrease from the $8.3 million the party raised during the first three months of the year.
That's more than double what the Liberals raised in the same window of time.
"They have lots of money to burn," said Grenier. "The gap in fundraising over the last six months between the two parties is the biggest it's ever been … which gives them an advantage between elections that the Liberals and New Democrats simply don't have."
The Conservative faithful will be gathering in Quebec City from Sept. 7 -9 for their annual convention. The website notes it's the first in-person convention since 2018.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Does the MP that was formerly charged for refusing a breathalizer' believe that?
Mike Davidson
People haven't moved to the Conservatives, they've moved away from the Liberals. The private sector middle class has seen the light as the Liberals have been on an unbridled trajectory to the left, trying to oust the NDP. They should be staying responsibly in the middle, as predecessors such as Paul Martin and Jean Chretien tried to do. But instead they have put us on a path to polarization not unlike we see in the US. So sad, it didn't need to happen.
Peter Mahoney
Reply to Mike Davidson
"Voter efficiency" requires strong divisions - it's how Liberals win elections these days.
Les McNalley
Reply to Mike Davidson
Nope. JT was voted the worst in 55 years. The NDP have made themselves irrelevant and the Greens are a non-starter. Not sure how they maintain party status.
Scott Forrest
Reply to Mike Davidson
Liberals have been their own worste enemy and it will bite them at the next election
Robert Tyre
Reply to Mike Davidson
Libs on the left? Hardly. They just steal a few popular and needed programs from the NDP whenever they need to differentiate themselves from the Cons and to keep themselves at the trough. As for the "middle class", seems you are referring to the pie in the sky political / media definition. The Census shows the real middle class making less than $35k a year. Actual numbers. Martin / Chretien engineered the taking of $28 B in worker pension money (now about $42 B) and had to change the law to do it, and another $50B from worker EI money (now about $75B). Left? Really
Robert Tyre
Reply to Les McNalley
Worst in 55 years by 40 year old voters. They should go back and look up Mulroney and his trade deal, airbus, etc. Then look up Chretien / Martin, adscam and a pile of other shenanigans. Move on and look up Harper, Duffy, robo calls, Nigel, etc. Talk to those who were there
Les McNalley
Reply to Robert Tyre
Under Harper, I bought a $40K truck for $25K.
Robert Tyre
Reply to Les McNalley
Good for you. Party "discount"?
David Amos
Reply to Peter Mahoney
True but I bet that I was not the only one surprised to learn that the Conservatives are as much as 10 points ahead of Liberals these days
Andre Longstock
'You can change the packaging but not the content:' We can all say the same for Trudeau.
Denis Reagan
Reply to Andre Longstock
If JT's package came with glasses, he would wear them.
David Amos
Reply to Andre Longstock
Amen
Jeremy Amott
Faux polls because most of the byelections and Provincial elections are showing the Cons are down 10 percent from the last election results. They wither under the microscope.
Scott Forrest
Reply to Jeremy Amott
no, you just refuse to accept the polls!
Jeremy Amott
Reply to Scott Forrest
Election results are 1000 times more relevant than polls.
Scott Forrest
Reply to Jeremy Amott
Yes the same people who now dont want to accept the polls are the same ones who mentioned the Liberals were ahead in the polls. Polls show a snap shot in time. Currently Conservatives are polling in Majority territory from coast to coast except in Quebec. And all this without the uhu uh uh PM talking at a debate stage. You guys are cooked in the next election
Reinhold Luft
Reply to Jeremy Amott
It's pretty obvious, the mood is for change in this country.
David Amos
Reply to Jeremy Amott
Oh so true
Darcie Foerster
Content Deactivated
robert lawson
Reply to Darcie Foerster
misogynistic post you realize that right?
Les McNalley
Reply to robert lawson
Just like their leader.
robert lawson
Reply to Les McNalley
debatable he has a shady past.
Les McNalley
Reply to robert lawson
JT's past is very shady, I agree.
David Amos
Reply to robert lawson
Misogynistic post or not I must say this article is about polling predictions on the next federal election and the Fat Lady won't sing about it until after the next polling day EH?
Denis Reagan
""He's warm, he's kind, he's empathetic and he listens…"
Does PP's advisor also work for Trump? What nonsense!
PP only has one act. To whine point and make faces. Listens? To himself.
Les McNalley
Reply to Denis Reagan
Hahahaha Weak.
David Amos
Reply to Les McNalley
Yup
Stephen McIntyre
Are we, as a nation, that easily slickered?
Reinhold Luft
Reply to Stephen McIntyre
the past 8 years says, yes.
TM elliston
Reply to Reinhold Luft
We've voted 3 times in the past 8 years. The Canadian voters as a collective, are get the government they select.
If the Conservatives were better for Canada and Canadians, why do you think they keep losing? Could it be because we were 'slickered' by the cor rupt CPC Reformers for the decade prior?
The ONLY ones to blame for the Liberals winning are the Conservatives. If they had something to offer Canadians, we'd vote for them. Many of us used to vote PC - the CPC are Reformers and we'll never vote for them
Reinhold Luft
Reply to TM elliston
Feel better ?
TM elliston
Reply to Reinhold Luft
Feel better informed about reality?
David Amos
Reply to TM elliston
Methinks we get the governments we deserve because we are so easily sllckered N'esy Pas?
TM elliston
A multi-million dollar ad campaign a full 2 years before an election? That and his new glasses-free look should really affect voters in October 2025. He's stating that Canada is broken and it's the fault of the Trudeau Liberals, but he has yet to ever offer up an alternative to any of the issues he whines about. How would he have avoided inflation? How would he have gotten us through the pandemic without spending? What would he have done about China with the information Trudeau had? etc, etc. He claims to know that Trudeau is doing everything wrong, you would think the guy would want to show Canadians that he would do things better. Why do you think he refuses to do that?
I wonder if he plans on getting vetted for his security clearance before the election or if whatever secrets he is keeping are too damaging to reveal to the Canadian public?
Peter Mahoney
Reply to TM elliston
If our media did its job, Pierre wouldn't have to do it for them.
TM elliston
Reply to Peter Mahoney
Pierre can't even do his own job, I'm pretty sure the media is doing fine without him.
I noticed you forgot to answer any of my questions about Poilievre's plans, why is that? He's great at yelling about Trudeau, but when is he going to actually come up with an alternative rather than just a whine?
David Amos
Reply to TM elliston
I smell an election coming in the near future just like PP does
Malcolm Scott
"He's warm, he's kind, he's empathetic and he listens…
LOL!!!
Les McNalley
Reply to Malcolm Scott
All true, you're just used to listening to your heartless hero.
Stephen McIntyre
Reply to Malcolm Scott
He listens to Stephen Harper.
David Amos
Reply to Stephen McIntyre
Everybody knows that
It will be nice when Justin is gone and Canada is not an international joke.
Don Corey
Reply to Bill Von Smith
Oh so true!
Taseko Tom
Reply to Bill Von Smith
P.P. is the laughingstock of the CPC , so there is that.
Don Corey
Reply to Taseko Tom
Dream on....
David Amos
Reply to Bill Von Smith
I second that emotion
| https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2022/10/poilievre-reveals-parliamentary-critics.html | | ||
Thursday, 13 October 2022Poilievre reveals parliamentary critics for Conservative party | |||
---------- Original message ----------
---------- Original message ---------- https://davidraymondamos3. Thursday, 13 October 2022
Poilievre reveals parliamentary critics for Conservative party5,072 views Oct 12, 2022  59 CommentsFrom: "Poilievre, Pierre - M.P." <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 06:17:40 +0000 Subject: I am 100% against the use of the Emergencies Act To: Thank you for your message. I appreciate the chance to hear your thoughts and concerns. I am 100% against the use of the Emergencies Act. You can click the image to watch my speech on the Emergencies Act or you can read the transcript below. [cid:1721f8f1-5f12-4beb-afe8- Sincerely, Pierre Poilievre P.C., M.P. Carleton Shadow Minister of Finance SK [PoilievrePierre_CPC]<http:// <https://www.facebook.com/ <https://twitter.com/#!/ http://www.pierremp.ca Reject the Emergencies Act February 20, 2022 https://www.youtube.com/watch? Madam Speaker, there is indeed an emergency in this country. Indeed, there are a series of emergencies. There is the emergency of the family whose 14-year-old daughter has attempted suicide after two years of isolation from sports, social interaction and other healthy activities that sustain a happy and heartful mind. There is the emergency of the federal public servant who, for unrecognized medical reasons, cannot get vaccinated and is now deprived of an income and a job. There is the emergency of the trucker who was hailed as a hero while driving our goods and services across international borders unvaccinated for over two years, who suddenly was declared a public health threat and deprived of his job as well. There is the emergency of the 32-year-old still living in his mom's basement, because under the pretext of COVID, the government printed so much money that it now costs $836,000 for the average house. There is the emergency of the single mother trembling as she walks down the grocery aisle because she cannot afford a basket of affordable goods, because the government has inflated her cost of living. There is the emergency created by the regulatory gatekeepers who keep people in poverty by blockading first nations people from the ability to develop their own resources and blockading immigrants from the ability to work in the very professions for which they are trained and qualified. These are the emergencies we should be addressing, but instead, the Prime Minister has created a new emergency. What is his motivation? Of course, it is to divide and conquer. How did this all start? Let us remember that the Prime Minister suddenly imposed a brand new vaccine mandate on the very truckers who had been free to travel across borders without a vaccine, and he did it at a time when provinces and countries around the world were removing vaccine mandates. He did it to a group of people who are by far the least likely to transmit a virus because they work and sleep all by themselves 22 hours a day. Media asked his health minister and his chief medical officer for evidence supporting the decision. Neither had any. In fact, the medical officer said it was time to return to normalcy, yet the Prime Minister, in spite of all these facts, brought in this new mandate to deprive people of their living, because he knew that it would spark in them a sense of desperation. If he could deprive them of their incomes, they would be so desperate that they would have to rise up and protest, and then he could further demonize them, call them names, attack their motives, belittle them and dehumanize them in order to galvanize the majority against the minority. This must be the political opportunity his Deputy Prime Minister spoke about when she described what COVID represented to the government. The Liberals have attempted to amplify and take advantage of every pain, every fear and every tragedy that has struck throughout this pandemic in order to divide one person against another and replace the people's freedom with the government's power. At the beginning of the pandemic, it started immediately. The government attempted to ram through a law that would have given it the power to raise any tax to any level for any reason without a vote in Parliament. It tried to pass Bill C-10 to strip away free speech online. Thankfully, Conservatives blocked it from doing so. The Prime Minister's authorities have said they want to track Canadian cell phones for the next five years. Now this, the Emergencies Act, is the latest and greatest example of attacks on our freedom. Ostensibly, it was meant to stop blockades, which had already ended before he even brought forward this legislation. In Alberta, in Manitoba, and at the Ambassador Bridge, those blockades were ended peacefully, in some cases with protesters hugging the police officers and bringing the matters to a successful close so that goods and services could resume. Instead, in that context, the Prime Minister brought in a law that not even Jean Chrétien brought in after 9/11 killed dozens of Canadians in a terrorist attack, that not even former prime minister Harper brought in when a terrorist murdered a Canadian soldier at the war monument and came running into Centre Block spraying bullets in all directions, and that not even the current Prime Minister brought in when blockades by first nations were standing in the way of those who were attempting to build the Coastal GasLink pipeline. For the first time in this law's three-decade history, the Prime Minister brings it in to address what he says was a protest in front of Parliament Hill. Ironically, this power goes beyond any of the protests and/or blockades the Prime Minister claims to want to address. For example, it would allow governments and banks to seize people's bank accounts and money for donating to the wrong political cause. One journalist asked the justice minister if small sums donated, for example, to support an end to vaccine mandates could get someone's bank account frozen. The minister did not deny it. Instead, he said that people who make donations of that kind should be very worried. To freeze people's bank accounts is not just an attack on their finances but on their personal security. If their bank accounts are frozen, they cannot buy food, they cannot buy fuel, they cannot pay their children's daycare fees and, under this law, they can face this personal attack without being charged with a single, solitary crime. The Prime Minister says that this is time-limited, yet his own finance minister said she wants some of the tools to be permanent. He said it will be geographically targeted, yet his own parliamentary secretary for justice said that “the act technically applies to all of Canada”. The rules apply everywhere and indefinitely. Finally, there is nothing in the act that limits the kinds of financial actions that could lead to people's accounts being frozen, and if they are frozen unjustifiably, the act specifically bans people from suing either the bank or the government for that unjustifiable treatment, opening the door for people who have nothing whatsoever to do with either the blockades or the protest having their bank accounts frozen without cause. The Prime Minister says he wants to do this to remove the blockades, blockades that have already been removed. He says he needs these unprecedented powers in order to bring our country's order back to the pre-protest period, although across this country that has already occurred. I say to the House that I oppose this unjustifiable power grab and, as prime minister of Canada, I will ensure that no such abuse of power ever happens again. However, I say that we should end some of these blockades. Madame Speaker, we can remove all of the blockades. Let us remove the mandates and restrictions that are blocking people's livelihoods today. Let us end the blockades on freedom of speech that the government is trying to erect with its online censorship bill. Let us end the regulatory blockades so that builders can provide affordable homes, first nations can develop their economies and escape poverty, and newcomers can actually work in the professions for which they were trained. Let us remove the inflationary taxes, deficits, and money printing so that people's wages can again buy them homes, food and fuel, let us remove that blockade. Let us get people back in control of their lives by making Canada the freest place on earth: free to speak, free to think, free to work, free to worship, free to own a home and build one's own destiny. Let us bind up the nation's wounds with compassion and respect and unite our country for freedom. ---------- Original message ---------- From: "Poilievre, Pierre - Assistant 1" <pierre.poilievre.a1@parl.gc. Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 16:49:00 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: Hey Zach Dubinsky I just called again Correct? BTW I called Jake Stewart too To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Please note, this email address is no longer monitored. Please contact pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca or 613-992-2772. Thank you. ---------- Original message ---------- From: pierre.poilievre.a1@parl.gc.ca Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 17:35:08 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: KPMG To: motomaniac333@gmail.com Thank you for your email. I am out of the office. Please contact Jeremy at pierre.poilievre.a4@parl.gc.ca or call 613-992-2772. Manjit ---------- Original message ---------- From: pierre.poilievre.a1@parl.gc.ca Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 19:18:56 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Michael Snaauw I called you and a lot of your pals today To: motomaniac333@gmail.com Thank you for your email. I will be out of the office from August 1-August 17th. If this is an urgent matter, please call 613-992-2772 or email pierre.poilievre.a2@parl.gc.ca Manjit ---------- Original message ---------- From: pierre.poilievre.a1@parl.gc.ca Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 09:39:24 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: A little Deja Vu for Rob Sweet and Pierre Poilievre et al To: motomaniac333@gmail.com Thank you for your email. Please note, I am out of the office and have no access to this email. If this is a scheduling matter, please contact Dan White or Daniel Dickin at 613-992-2772 or pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca. If your email is regarding a constituency matter, please contact JP Mitton at 613-692-3331 or pierre.poilievre.a3@parl.gc.ca Manjit Athwal
"Polling analyst Éric Grenier, the author of TheWrit.ca, says the timing of the campaign makes sense. "Usually when there is a new leader in place and Canadians don't know a lot about them, there is an attempt to try to make them seem more like a likable person," he said."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISU5fkIe5ZY&ab_channel=%C3%89ricGrenier
The Writ Podcast - Ep. #104: Trudeau does the shuffle
1.86K subscribers
Stephanie Levitz and Aaron Wherry on what the cabinet shuffle means.
https://www.thewrit.ca/
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau didn’t just shuffle his cabinet — he overhauled it, replacing seven ministers and changing the roles of most of the others.
A simple refresh ahead of the next election or an admission that things weren’t working?
To discuss what it all means, I’m joined this week by Stephanie Levitz of the Toronto Star and the CBC’s Aaron Wherry.
https://www.thewrit.ca/p/the-weekly-writ-for-aug-9-conservatives
The Weekly Writ for Aug. 9: Conservatives gaining in the right placesPlus, PCs win big in Nova Scotia byelection, the riding to watch tomorrow night in Saskatchewan and Ernest Manning's first victory.
The polls have been good for Pierre Poilievre and the Conservatives this summer, and they’ve gotten better in places where the Conservatives need to make gains in the next election. Case in point: how things have shifted in the Léger and Abacus Data polls since last year. We’ll focus on polls conducted in July 2022 and July 2023. Last July, Léger gave the Liberals a lead of four points across the country. Abacus had the Conservatives ahead by five. Average those out, and it was effectively a tie. The NDP trailed in third with 19-21% support. This July, Léger had the Conservatives ahead by nine points, while Abacus put the Conservatives ahead by 10. The NDP trailed with 17-18%. On average, this suggests the Conservatives gained six points, with the Liberals down three and the NDP down 2.5. With the exception of the Prairies, where the Conservatives dropped an average of one point between these two sets of polls, the party is up everywhere. The biggest gains have come in Atlantic Canada (+9.5), British Columbia (+8.5) and Ontario (+7). That’s just about the best scenario the party could hope for when it comes to picking up new seats. Growth in Quebec (+4.5) and Alberta (+5) has been more modest, but still good. That growth hasn’t come from every party equally. The Liberals have plummeted 13 points in Atlantic Canada. They are down 6.5 points in Alberta and 5.5 points in the Prairies. But they’ve only lost 2.5 points in B.C., two points in Ontario and 1.5 points in Quebec. It’s because the Liberals are holding on in the three biggest provinces that the Conservatives are being kept from reaching the majority government threshold. The Bloc Québécois has been holding steady at around 31% to 32%, matching their results in the last two elections. Apparently, the Bloc has its vote and it isn’t budging. The New Democrats haven’t seen their support move by more than a point in either direction in Alberta, Quebec or Atlantic Canada — all regions where their seat holdings and prospects are minimal. But they are down 5.5 points in both British Columbia and the Prairies, as well as 4.5 points in Ontario. So, it certainly seems that the Conservatives are taking from both parties. As I laid out in yesterday’s analysis, it does matter where that new support is coming from, and there are some signs that some of it is coming from areas where the Conservatives already hold all the seats. Surges in rural Ontario, the B.C. Interior or the parts of the Maritimes that are already blue won’t help in the seat count. But there’s undoubtedly enough spillover here to put the Conservatives in a solid minority government position. We’ll see if they can tip over into majority territory. Before getting to today’s Weekly Writ, don’t forget to join me and Philippe J. Fournier tomorrow night for our livestream of the Saskatchewan byelection results. It starts at 10 PM ET / 8 PM CT on Thursday and you’ll find the stream here: These are some interesting contests, with two urban seats being targeted by the Saskatchewan New Democrats and one rural seat where the governing Saskatchewan Party is trying to tamp down support for rivals to its right. If you missed it last week, check out my discussion with Adam Hunter in the most recent episode of The Writ Podcast to get caught up. Alright, now to what is in this week’s instalment of the Weekly Writ:
https://www.thewrit.ca/p/the-weekly-writ-for-aug-2-so-are | |||
The Weekly Writ for Aug. 2: So are the Liberals doomed all of a sudden?
Why you should take a breather before changing everything you believe to be true, plus great fundraising for the Conservatives and bad polls for the Liberals.
Welcome to the Weekly Writ, a round-up of the latest federal and provincial polls, election news and political history that lands in your inbox every Wednesday morning.
Well, that escalated quickly.
Two weeks ago, the discussion among Canada’s pundit class (myself included) was about what could and should happen if, after the next election, the Liberals finished just behind the Conservatives in the seat count but could still form a majority with the NDP.
Not much talk about that these days.
Instead, the conventional wisdom has suddenly shifted from a close contest between Justin Trudeau and Pierre Poilievre to one in which the Trudeau Liberals are trailing badly in the polls, the government is now unlikely to be re-elected and the cabinet shuffle from last week was a desperate attempt to right the ship of state that went disastrously off course.
That’s quite a turn. But ask yourself this: has anything materially changed in the last two weeks?
Well, the numbers have. Abacus Data released a poll on cabinet shuffle day that set the agenda, as Trudeau’s trip to Rideau Hall took place on a day in which the Liberals were trailing the Conservatives by 10 points, a psychological threshold that makes for a very clear-cut story. Most reports I read or heard cast the shuffle in the light of the Liberals’ bad polling.
Those numbers were then corroborated by a Léger poll published by our friend Philippe J. Fournier. Though it was conducted a few weeks before the Abacus survey, Léger’s poll had the Conservatives nine points ahead.
From the Liberals’ perspective, both of these polls are among the worst we’ve seen from these reputable pollsters for years and, by my calculation, would put the Conservatives knocking on the door of (but not necessarily getting to) a majority government.
Those results can’t be dismissed, and it is very possible that the Liberals are in such dire straits. Indeed, that is a reasonable conclusion to draw.
But when the narrative shifts gears that quickly over such a small number of data points, we might want to pump the brakes a little bit.
Now, I’m not going to sugar-coat things for the Liberals. As you’ll see below, I detail just how bad these numbers are for the party. But, if there’s anything that I hope I’ve been consistent with over my career of watching and commenting on the polls, it’s to counsel against over-reacting (and, when appropriate, under-reacting) to some new numbers. Especially when there is nothing urgent — like, oh, an election — happening within the next few days.
That fact is, we’ve seen similar numbers before. Abacus had the Conservatives ahead nationally by eight points in January and February. Léger had a six-point lead for the Conservatives as recently as April. Last fall, a few surveys gave the Conservatives leads of between seven and nine points in Ontario.
Plus, these numbers come as the rolling Nanos Research poll has consistently given the Conservatives a lead of six-to-eight points since June, the same kind of lead Nanos was awarding the Conservatives at various times in January, March and May.
That the Liberals are trailing the Conservatives is now obvious — and it has been that way for the last year. The range of polls only extends from a strong Conservative lead to a statistical tie, suggesting that the environment we’re in remains a modest Conservative lead of about four-to-six points, perhaps now widening to five-to-seven points. That being the case, we should regularly expect polls to show the Conservatives ahead by nine or 10 points, or the two parties neck-and-neck.
But the timing of the Abacus release, coupled by the corroboration of the Léger poll, has produced a narrative shift that may or may not prove to be predictive (or self-reinforcing) of a serious negative trend for the Liberals. That both Abacus and Léger gave the Conservatives a solid lead in Ontario and erased the Liberals’ lead in Atlantic Canada should be setting off alarm bells in the PMO. The Liberals remain very competitive in Quebec, but those Ontario and Atlantic numbers would make it impossible for the Liberals to have a hope of matching, let alone surpassing, the Conservatives in the seat count.
I’ve also heard discussion (and received questions) concerning the different stories being told by the polls and the recent byelections. In the quartet of byelections in June and the more recent contest in July, the Liberals have held their own, suggesting that the party is not bleeding the kind of support that the polls suggest they are.
I do think that is a data point worth paying attention to that counsels against changing all of our priors over a few polls. But those byelection results will not stand up against a consistent polling trend that turns against the Liberals. I’ll be the first to defend the significance and importance of byelections, but I can’t say that the results in Calgary Heritage tell me much about how the Liberals are doing in Ontario.
Byelections have proven predictive of directional trends in subsequent general elections, but the research I’ve done looking at the history of byelections in Canada shows that they predict whether a party will gain or lose support in the next general election only two-thirds of the time. One-third of the time, they predict squat.
All this to say that if your prior position was that the next election was a toss-up between the Liberals and the Conservatives, the last few weeks should probably shift your view to seeing the Conservatives as the favourites, but by no means a lock to win (the seat math is still tricky for them).
I’m simply not convinced that things have dramatically changed over the last two weeks. The Liberals should be worried, but suddenly assigning them the title of “dead government walking” because of a couple of polls might be a tad premature.
Now, to what is in this week’s instalment of the Weekly Writ:
News on the Conservatives’ fundraising dominance, what to make of the results of last week’s Ontario byelections and a new research paper on race and voting.
Polls show the Conservatives with a big lead, plus Doug Ford’s PCs are ahead in Ontario.
The Conservatives knocking on the door of a majority government if the election were held today.
A Regina byelection in this week’s riding profile.
The transformative 1943 Ontario election in the #EveryElectionProject.
IN THE NEWS
Conservatives open up widest money lead ever
While I urge caution on interpreting the polls, I would urge panic for the Liberals when it comes to fundraising.
The Conservatives raised $7,964,000 in the second quarter (Q2) of 2023 from nearly 47,000 individual contributions. That is up significantly from the $4.4 million raised in Q2 2022, though that was in the midst of a leadership race when donor money was heading elsewhere.
The fundraising ability of Poilievre’s crew is remarkable. He has led the party now for three full fundraising quarters, and those three quarters rank #1, #2 and #3 on the all-time list for the Conservatives outside of an election year. The $16.3 million raised by the Conservatives so far in 2023 ranks only second to the run-up to the 2019 election, when the Conservatives raised $16.5 million.
That does, I suppose, urge more caution. The Conservatives didn’t win the 2019 election despite out-raising the Liberals by a significant margin. Money talks, but it doesn’t say everything.
The Liberals took in $3,191,000 from almost 31,000 contributions, an increase on the $2.8 million the Liberals raised in Q2 2022. While it pales in comparison to the Conservative haul, this was the best Q2 for the Liberals outside of an election year since 2016. The Liberals have raised $6.8 million so far this year, up from $6 million raised in the first two quarters of last year. Again, that’s their best start to a non-election year since 2016, shortly after the party first came to power.
Relative to their own performances these are decent numbers for the Liberals. Relative to the Conservatives, though, they aren’t decent. The Conservatives have raised $9.5 million more than the Liberals so far in 2023. That’s the widest gap ever to start a year, beating the previous record of $9.3 million set by Stephen Harper’s Conservatives in 2011. That year didn’t end so well for the Liberals.
The New Democrats raised $1,375,000 from about 17,000 contributions, up from the $1.2 million raised in Q2 2022. This was a good quarter for the NDP, as their only better Q2s in recent years were in 2019 and 2021, when the party was revving up for an election. The NDP has raised $2.6 million so far in 2023, a little better than where they were at this point in 2022.
The Greens raised $408,000, their worst Q2 since 2013, while the Bloc Québécois took in $240,000. The Bloc’s $562,000 haul for the first half of 2023 is below what it managed over the previous two years. As of writing, the Q2 results for the People’s Party had not been posted.
Oh, and past Conservative leadership contestants still raising money to pay off debt include Peter MacKay ($133,000 raised in Q2 2023), Scott Aitchison ($42,500) and Roman Baber ($24,000).
Ontario Liberals win two byelections as Tories fight amongst themselves
Last Thursday, the Ontario Liberals pulled off a bit of a coup when they won re-election in their stronghold of Scarborough–Guildwood and flipped a seat in eastern Ontario that had been painted Tory blue for a century.
That latter win in Kanata–Carleton was an upset — not in the sense that it was unexpected, but in the sense that this is a seat the Progressive Conservatives can normally rely upon. The riding has changed over the years, but its current boundaries cover territory that has voted for the PCs (and the Conservatives before them) in every general election since 1923. The last non-Tory to represent this part of the province was a United Farmer.
We shouldn’t over-state the importance of this win, though. The Ontario Liberals are the third-place party at Queen’s Park with just nine seats and are in the midst of a leadership race. Their win here can largely be credited to Karen McCrimmon, the former Liberal MP for the riding who opted to run provincially in this byelection after stepping aside from federal politics ahead of the 2021 election.
McCrimmon took 34.4% of the vote, a far cry from the 43% she took in her last victory as a federal Liberal in 2019. Still, this represented a big jump of 11 points for the Liberals since the last provincial election. It looks like a nearly one-to-one trade with the PCs, whose candidate (Sean Webster) did 11.3 points worse than Merrilee Fullerton did last time. The 32.3% of the vote taken by the PCs here is their worst ever.
A bigger surprise than McCrimmon winning might have been the performance of the NDP’s Melissa Coenraad. She took 29.7% of the vote, a gain of 5.5 points in what turned out to be a three-way race. That result is even better than what the NDP did in Kanata–Carleton in 2018, when the party was at its recent high watermark.
Jennifer Boudreau of the New Blues dropped slightly to 2%, while the Greens’ Steven Warren was down 4.1 points from the party’s performance here in 2022. Turnout in the byelection was 35.1%, not great but respectable enough for a provincial byelection in July.
Turnout in Scarborough–Guildwood was far worse, with just 21.8% of eligible voters casting a ballot.
The Liberals’ Andrea Hazell was able to hold on to the seat with 36.6% of the vote, a drop of 9.7 points since 2022. That’s not terrific for the Liberals and puts an asterisk on the Liberals’ two wins — if the party’s support dropped nearly 10 points in Scarborough–Guildwood, it stands to reason that the Liberals probably would not have been able to win in Kanata–Carleton without a star candidate on the ballot.
But a drop for the Liberals here did not correspond with good news for the PCs, who dropped 1.9 points themselves to 29.6%. Gary Crawford, a Scarborough city councillor, was supposed to be a star candidate for the PCs, but he doesn’t seem to have helped at all. In fact, his performance here is below how the party did both in 2018 and 2022, elections in which they formed government. It is more like the results the PCs put up here in 2007, 2011 and 2014 — elections in which they lost.
Here again the New Democrats did surprisingly well, with Thadsha Navaneethan gaining 9.5 points for the party and finishing a strong third with 26.2%. That didn’t quite match the NDP’s 27.6% from 2018, but was nevertheless an impressive result.
The Stop the New Sex-Ed Agenda party finished fourth with 3.3%, making the finishes for the New Blues and (especially) Greens at 1% rather embarrassing.
Also embarrassing: the post-results gossip. Someone within the federal Conservative Party felt it was really important for everyone to know that Pierre Poilievre’s Conservatives had purposely tried to screw over Doug Ford’s PCs by denying them assistance in Kanata–Carleton. This was apparently an act of retribution for the PCs denying the Conservatives help in the recent federal byelection in Oxford.
How important did this “senior federal Conservative” think it was to get this message of internecine fighting out? Within minutes of the results being finalized, Laura Stone of The Globe and Mail, Robert Benzie of the Toronto Star and Colin D’Mello of Global News were tweeting it out. Not once, not twice, but thrice did this senior Conservative pick up the phone to reach out to some of the top Queen’s Park reporters to spread the word.
Let’s be honest — if I’m the Ford PCs, I would have wanted to stay out of the Oxford byelection, too. There was controversy about the nomination process, as a candidate close to the Poilievre crew (Arpan Khanna) was parachuted-in from the GTA. I’m not sure why the Ford PCs would want to pick a side in a divisive local bun fight.
I’m a little amazed that anyone thought it was a good idea to make a private beef between the Ford PCs and the Poilievre Conservatives so public, with a gleeful vindictiveness that should impress no one. How it helps the federal Conservatives is beyond me, as the Ontario PCs are at least as popular as the Conservatives in the province and, unlike the federal organization, have actually won an election in Ontario in the last decade.
From the Ivory Tower: The role of race in voting patterns
An interesting-looking article is in early preview in the Canadian Journal of Political Science. The full article is available to university students and faculty through their library, but the rest of us will have to wait. The abstract sounds intriguing, however, as Isaac Haie of Occidental College in Los Angeles looked at the impact on voting intentions after Jagmeet Singh, “the first non-white leader of a nationally competitive Canadian political party,” took over the NDP. Here’s a bit of the abstract:
I show that NDP vote choice polarized on the basis of racial attitudes following Singh's ascension to party leader. Voters with cold feelings toward racial minorities were less likely to vote for the NDP in 2019 and 2021 than in comparable historical elections. In contrast, there is no significant difference between 2019/2021 and prior elections in support for the Liberals and Conservatives among such voters. These results suggest that racial attitudes are salient in Canadian elections and that national parties may face an electoral penalty when selecting non-white party leaders.
I’ll keep an eye on this article to see if it will be put in open access in the coming weeks.
THIS WEEK’S POLLS
Conservatives finally break through in Ontario?
The two national surveys published last week had great news for the Conservatives and disastrous news for the Liberals, with the Conservatives opening up a nine or 10 point lead. And, unlike other surveys that have put the Conservatives ahead nationally, the regional results were nearly as positive for them as the toplines.
The polls were by Abacus Data and Léger. The Abacus poll was in the field July 20-25, so it is far more recent than the Léger survey, which was in the field July 7-10.
Nationally, Abacus gave the Conservatives 38% support, a jump of four points since the end of June. The Liberals were down one point to 28%, followed by the NDP at 18% (-2), the Bloc at 7% (unchanged), the Greens at 5% (also unchanged) and the PPC at 4% (-1).
Léger had the Conservatives at 37%, up six points since the end of May, with the Liberals down five points to 28%. The NDP was down two to 17%, followed by the Bloc at 8% (-1), the Greens at 5% (-1) and the PPC at 3% (+1).
It’s the regional results that really stand out. The Conservatives held their usual lead in Western Canada, but the results in Ontario and Atlantic Canada were particularly good for Poilievre.
Abacus gave the Conservatives 39% support in Ontario, six points ahead of the Liberals. Léger also put the Conservatives at 39%, but ahead by nine points. When Abacus and Léger were both in the field at around the same time in late May and early June, the Conservatives only had a lead of one or two points in the province.
The one-point lead awarded to the Liberals in Atlantic Canada is also a big shift, as in the spring the two polling firms awarded the Liberals a wider lead of nine (Abacus) and 27 (Léger) points. That’s a huge change.
Quebec’s results were more typical, while British Columbia provides the point of disagreement. Abacus gives the Conservatives a 14 point lead (over the NDP), while Léger has the Liberals ahead by two.
B.C. apart, these results would really eat away at the Liberals’ seat count in Ontario and Atlantic Canada. Using a simple swing model, Léger’s numbers would award the Conservatives 68 seats in Ontario, with just 42 going to the Liberals, while the Atlantic count would be 18 Liberal seats and 13 for the Conservatives. The Abacus numbers would produce the same results in Atlantic Canada, but a smaller Conservative margin in Ontario (61 seats to 49). The better B.C. results for Poilievre would make up the difference, however, and in both scenarios the Conservatives would be around the 160-seat mark, only a few shy of a majority government.
With both polls, the Liberals would be down about 40 seats from where they currently stand, with no realistic hope of holding on to government in a minority parliament.
The Léger poll only contained voting intentions results, but the Abacus survey paints a picture of problem after problem for the Liberals. Government disapproval is at 51%, as high as it has been in recent years, with approval at just 32%. Justin Trudeau’s positive impressions are down to 29%, with 51% holding a negative impression of the prime minister. Only 19% believe that the Liberals should be re-elected, while 50% say it is time for a change and there is a good alternative available.
It’s not all a slam-dunk for Pierre Poilievre, however. The spike in Conservative support is not coinciding with a spike in his personal ratings, as 31% of Canadians hold a positive impression of him, virtually unchanged from when he first became leader. His negative ratings stand at 37%, again largely unchanged over the last year (though down from the high of 40% he reached in mid-June).
Nevertheless, this Abacus poll is dreadful for the Liberals, with the trend lines all heading in the wrong direction for them — and in the worst places.
POLLING NEWS BRIEFS
Also from Abacus Data, Doug Ford’s Progressive Conservatives lead in Ontario by 17 points, with 41% support to just 24% for the Liberals and 23% for the NDP, virtually identical to where things stood in the 2022 provincial election. The results don’t quite match up with the PCs’ poor showing in the two byelections, but the local dynamics at play probably had a lot to do with that.
IF THE ELECTION WERE HELD TODAY
The Conservatives find themselves knocking on the door of a majority government, now with an estimated at 161 seats. That’s thanks largely to significant gains at the expense of the Liberals in Ontario and smaller gains from the NDP in British Columbia.
Despite the byelections, the Abacus numbers point to a better overall picture for Doug Ford’s PCs. They are back up to 79 seats, with the NDP at 30, the Liberals at 12 and the Greens at two.
The following seat estimates are derived from a uniform swing model that is based on trends in recent polls as well as minor tweaks and adjustments. Rather than the product of a statistical model, these estimates are my best guess of what an election held today would produce, based both on the data and my own experience observing dozens of elections since 2008.
Changes are compared to last week. Parties are ordered according to their finish in the previous election (with some exceptions for minor parties).
RIDING OF THE WEEK
Regina Walsh Acres (Saskatchewan)
In the three provincial byelections taking place in Saskatchewan on August 10, the focus will primarily be on the two Regina seats the governing Saskatchewan Party won by small margins in 2020. Of those two, Regina Coronation Park was the closest, decided by just five points in the last election and by an even smaller margin in the one before that. If any of these three ridings are going to flip to the New Democrats, it is Regina Coronation Park.
But Regina Walsh Acres will still be one to watch.
Derek Meyers won this seat for the Sask. Party with 46.6% of the vote in 2020, replacing former Sask. Party MLA Warren Steinley, who had made the jump to federal politics. An up-and-comer, Meyers’s political career was tragically cut short when he passed away from cancer earlier this year.
Kelly Hardy of the NDP came second with 37.7%, followed by Independent candidate Sandra Morin, who finished with 11.8%, and Ken Grey of the Progressive Conservatives with 3.9%.
Morin was the NDP candidate (and a former NDP cabinet minister) before then-leader Ryan Meili vetoed her nomination. Morin ran as an Independent, complicating the electoral math here. Some of Morin’s vote would have otherwise gone to the NDP. Had there not been the nomination controversy, the margin in Regina Walsh Acres might have been even closer.
The Sask. Party has held this riding since 2011, but prior to that the New Democrats held sway here, winning every election between 1986 and 2007 (though in that last campaign the Sask. Party didn’t have a candidate here).
This riding in northwestern Regina is mostly suburban and had a mix of polls won by the NDP and Sask. Party in 2020. The NDP’s strength lies mostly south of 9th Avenue North, closer to the city centre, while the Sask. Party does best on the outskirts of the city.
The most recent polling by Insightrix Research puts the NDP ahead of the Sask. Party by six points in Regina, representing a swing of seven points since the last election when the Sask. Party won the city by about one percentage point.
But the 44% recorded by Insightrix represents a small drop for the NDP, who took 46% of the vote in Regina in 2020. It’s difficult to know exactly what to take from the numbers, as the poll awarded 13% to the PCs. The party took only 3% of the vote in the city in the last election.
The sample size in Regina was small, so we shouldn’t lean too heavily on the results. But if we assume that a lot of that PC vote isn’t real — brand confusion with the federal Conservatives might be inflating the PC numbers — then Regina hasn’t shifted very dramatically. Covering that 8.9-point margin from 2020 won’t be easy for the NDP, even with the help of some of that Morin vote.
Tasked with holding off the NDP is the Sask. Party’s Nevin Markwart, who played 309 games in the NHL between 1983 and 1992, mostly for the Boston Bruins and also the Calgary Flames. Since retirement from professional hockey, he has worked in the investment and cybersecurity sectors.
Elementary school teacher Jared Clarke is running for the NDP, while Indigenous activist Joseph Reynolds is the Green candidate. Rose Buscholl, the interim leader of the Saskatchewan PCs, is running here. Her result will provide a reality check on where the party actually stands in Regina — and perhaps beyond.
(ALMOST) ON THIS DAY in the #EveryElectionProject
The Big Blue Machine revs up
August 4, 1943
Wars are transformative moments in history, and the Ontario election of 1943, taking place just as the tide of the Second World War was turning in the Allies’ favour, was a transformative moment for Ontario.
Not only did the election gave birth to a new political dynasty, it also inaugurated a new party system that has survived in Ontario to this day.
Even before the war started, Ontario had been going through a period of turmoil. The Great Depression had impacted the province like everywhere else, and helped bring to power the charismatic (and some would say demagogic) Mitchell Hepburn, a populist with a volatile personality — and a colourful personal life. Though a Liberal premier, Hepburn would quickly become the nemesis of Liberal prime minister Mackenzie King.
After initially working together once Hepburn had come to power, the two would eventually come to hate each other. Hepburn felt that King interfered too much in his bailiwick. The paranoid King saw in Hepburn a rival who was continually trying to bring him down and take his spot at the head of the Liberal Party and the country.
When Hepburn joined Quebec premier Maurice Duplessis in criticizing King’s prosecution of the war effort, the prime minister pulled out all the stops to defeat Duplessis in the 1939 Quebec election and subsequently took his own national victory in 1940 as a rebuke of Hepburn’s attacks.
Eventually, Hepburn’s erratic and hard-living style was impacting his leadership of the Ontario Liberals as well as his own health, and he stepped down as premier in 1942 (though he stayed on as the provincial treasurer). By then, though, Hepburn had almost gone entirely over to the other side, campaigning with federal Conservative leader Arthur Meighen in the York South byelection (which Meighen lost) and saying he would vote for John Bracken, Meighen’s replacement as leader, in the next federal campaign. When Hepburn likened King’s political tactics to Adolf Hitler’s, the Ontario Liberals had finally had enough and Gordon Conant, Hepburn’s ally and choice as interim successor, removed Hepburn from cabinet.
As the date for the Liberal leadership approached, the divisions within the Liberal Party were coming to a head. Conant, claiming nervous exhaustion, removed himself from contention and checked himself into a hospital. Delegates chose Harry Nixon, who had brought the remnants of the old United Farmers and Progressives into the Liberal Party in the 1930s, as the new leader and premier of the province.
Nixon had King’s support, and the prime minister saw in his victory a deliverance from the Hepburn menace, a “remarkable evidence of the moral forces that work in the unseen realm, and of the vindication of right in the end.” King also advised that Nixon go to the polls as soon as possible, and Nixon called an election shortly after he was sworn in as premier.
But Nixon’s decisive leadership victory did not heal the divides within the Liberal Party, and the organizational links between the provincial and federal wings had been severed. Hepburn wouldn’t go away either, and he ran as an Independent Liberal in his Elgin riding.
While the Liberals were tearing themselves apart, the Conservative opposition was getting its act together. Now under the leadership of First World War veteran George Drew and re-branded the Progressive Conservative Party (Bracken, a Progressive premier in Manitoba, had accepted the national leadership of the party on the condition that the name be changed), the Tories had developed a progressive 22-point policy platform and strengthened their local organizations across the province.
Also stacked against Nixon and the Liberals was the rising Co-operative Commonwealth Federation under Ted Jolliffe. Though the Ontario CCF had been shutout in the 1937 election, the war saw a rise in CCF support across the country. National polling was beginning to put the socialists in contention and its prospects for forming government in places like British Columbia and Saskatchewan were looking up. Labour was uniting behind the CCF and Jolliffe was an effective, articulate leader, pitching a future vision of the province that would deliver a better life for workers, soldiers and their families after the war was over.
Polls before the campaign had put the CCF in third, but by election day the latest numbers from the nascent Gallup Poll had the CCF ahead, with 36% support to 33% for Drew’s PCs and 31% for the Liberals.
The competitive contest pushed the Liberals to try to lump the PCs and the CCF together, seeing in Drew’s progressive platform yet more socialism that only a Liberal government could keep at bay. But the PCs were just as opposed to the rise of the CCF — Drew would campaign hard against the ‘Red Menace’ once in power — and his allies went to bat against the socialists, claiming that the CCF would break Canada’s connection to the British monarchy. One third-party ad charged that “The C.C.F. Would Get Rid of Churchill” and begged Ontarians to “Keep Ontario British”.
The Liberals were facing pressure from both ends — and also had to grapple with the unpopularity of the Mackenzie King government. King had just held a plebiscite on conscription that divided English and French Canada (again) and was still refusing to send conscripts overseas, so the Tories cast Nixon as King’s puppet, and King’s government as beholden to Quebec. “The voice may be the voice of Nixon,” Drew said, “but the words will be the words of Mackenzie King.”
Citing the requirements of the war, the teetotaler King had also instituted a reduction in the supply of beer in the country, sparking an uproar among Canadians who were willing to give up a lot for the war effort — except a drink. It wasn’t prohibition, but the result was that the beer halls would run out of supply before the end of a hot summer’s day, when labourers and farmers were thirsting for a cool beer after a long day’s work under the sun. The Liberals were doomed.
Still, the outcome of the election was in doubt. Every leader claimed they were on track for victory, but an editorial in the Ottawa Evening Citizen summed it up best: “stalemate seems probable,” the editorialists wrote, “yet so unpredictable are elections under present circumstances that almost anything can happen.”
The result showed a divided province. Drew and the Progressive Conservatives won 38 seats, an increase of 15 since the 1937 election, but saw their share of the vote drop 3.6 points to 35.8%. They suffered losses to the CCF, but also made gains in the southwestern portion of the province that had long been the Liberal heartland, and where the Tories had been shutout in 1937.
The CCF captured 31.6% of the vote, a gain of 26 points since the last election. The party won 34 seats, sweeping northern Ontario, making significant gains in Toronto and winning seats in the industrial centres of Windsor, Hamilton and Kitchener. Two Communists were also elected (A.A. MacLeod and J.B. Salsberg) in Toronto under the Labour-Progressive banner, as the Communist Party had been banned in 1940.
Support for the Liberals collapsed, dropping 19 points to just 30% and leaving the party with only 15 seats — 16 seats if Hepburn, elected as an Independent Liberal, is added to the total. The Liberals had retained their support among Franco-Ontarians and in parts of the southwest, but they had been dealt a serious blow.
“In my inner nature,” King wrote in his diary after the results of the election were known, “I feel a sense of relief that a cabinet that has been so unprincipled and devoid of character has been swept out of Queen’s Park.”
The Liberals had indeed been beaten, but Hepburn wasn’t done just yet. He’d return as leader once again after Nixon’s resignation. But the 1945 election would not see the return of the Liberals to power. Instead, Drew and the Progressive Conservatives would secure a majority government — and the Big Blue Machine would continue powering Ontario until 1985. The CCF had come close in 1943 and would whither under Drew’s ferocious attacks in 1945, but it formed the official opposition again in 1948 and on several more occasions as the Ontario New Democrats, who themselves would form a government in 1990.
The 1943 election had brought the Conservatives back to power, where they would remain for decades. But it also brought about a new dynamic in Ontario politics that has stood the test of time.
That’s it for the Weekly Writ this week. The next episode of The Writ Podcast will be dropping on Friday. As always, the episode will land in your inbox but you can also find it on Apple Podcasts and other podcasting apps. And don’t forget to subscribe to my YouTube Channel, where I post videos, livestreams and interviews from the podcast!
Methinks Kathy Bockus and DeAnna Hill and my Brother in Law Reid Chedore know why I am laughing TJ Burke's latest trick N'esy Pas Higgy?
LeClair, Andy<Andy.LeClair@rcmp-grc.gc.ca> | Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 2:56 AM |
| To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | |
Good day, I am currently on annual leave and will be returning on 2022-10-12. If you require immediate assistance, please contact S/Sgt. Eric Dube at (506)365-0490. Bonjour Je suis présentement absent du bureau. Je serai de retour le 12 octobre 2022. Pour toutes demandes urgentes, veuillez contacter S/Sgt. Eric Dube (506)365-0490. | |
Austin, Hon. Kris (JPS/JSP)<Kris.Austin@gnb.ca> | Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 2:48 AM |
| To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | |
Thank you for taking the time to write, your email is important to me. Your email has been received and will be reviewed in a timely manner. If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of another area of government, staff will refer your email for review and consideration. If this is a request for the electoral district of Fredericton-Grand Lake, please contact Janet Johnston
****************************** Merci d'avoir pris le temps d'écrire, votre courriel a pour moi une grande importance. Votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les meilleurs délais. Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un autre secteur du gouvernement, le personnel acheminera votre courriel pour examen et considération. S’il s’agit d’une demande pour la circonscription électorale de Fredericton-Grand Lake, veuillez communiquer avec Janet Johnston au (506) 440-9594 ou par courriel au Janet.Johnston@gnb.ca . | |
Attn Justice Minister Kris Austin Commissioner Michael Duheme and Sgt. Maxime Babineau I have had enough of RCMP harassment
Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada<mcu@justice.gc.ca> | Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 8:12 AM |
| To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | |
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Arif Virani, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be carefully reviewed.
We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.
-------------------
Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable Arif Virani, ministre de la Justice et procureur général du Canada.
Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant. | |
Moore, Rob - M.P.<Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca> | Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 8:08 AM |
| To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | |
*This is an automated response*
Thank you for contacting the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. office. We appreciate the time you took to get in touch with our office.
If you did not already, please ensure to include your full contact details on your email and the appropriate staff will be able to action your request. We strive to ensure all constituent correspondence is responded to in a timely manner.
If your question or concern is time sensitive, please call our office: 506-832-4200.
Again, we thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts and concerns.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~ Office of the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. Member of Parliament for Fundy Royal
| |
David Amos<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> |  Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 8:07 AM |
| To: Maxime.Babineau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "Michael.Duheme" <Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca> | |
| Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, info@donaldbest.ca, DonaldBestOnline@proton.me, "martin.gaudet" <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca> | |
Attn Sgt. Maxime Babineau 506-523-4611
David Amos<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 3:49 PM |
| To: Maxime.Babineau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "Michael.Duheme" <Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca> | |
| Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com> | |
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2023 21:56:30 -0300 Subject: Fwd: Attn Pearl.Eliadis You should have shared my email with the cop who called me To: Erika.Norris@rcmp-grc.gc.ca Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com> https://www.krsc.ca/crime- Richibucto, November 7th, 2022 — On Tuesday, November 1st, the Crime Prevention Association of New Brunswick and the Department of Public Safety held their annual Crime Prevention Awards in Oromocto. These awards and certificates are awarded to individuals and groups who merit recognition for their contributions to community safety and crime prevention. Each year, an Awards Luncheon is held to induct nominees for the different award categories. This year, four members of the RCMP Richibucto Detachment were recognized. CPO Jean Francois Leblanc, Cpl. Ricky LeBlond and Cst. Erika Norris received the Province of New Brunswick Certificate of Recognition. This certificate is presented to individuals, organizations or businesses who have made an outstanding contribution to the development, implementation, promotion and enhancement of crime prevention and safe communities. The fourth member of the RCMP Richibucto Detachment to be recognized was Sgt. Maxime Babineau. He was awarded the Constable Leo ‘’Tyler’’ Francis Award. The CPANB established this award in memory of the late Constable Tyler Francis, an RCMP officer who demonstrated a high standard of dedication toward crime prevention. The award is presented to police officers or peace officers who have demonstrated significant personal and professional commitment to crime prevention initiatives in their community for at least five years. The Kent Regional Service Commission is proud of the dedication and achievements of the RCMP officers of the Richibucto Detachment. The Kent Regional Service Commission has been serving the public since 2013. The organization has two mandates: local planning and solid waste management, as well as several responsibilities for regional collaboration. Regional cooperation in policing is one of these additional responsibilities. Visit www.krsc.ca. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2023 18:15:33 -0300 Subject: Attn Pearl.Eliadis You should have shared my email with the cop who called me To: info@rights-law.net, mbrownstein@cotesaintluc.org, "Michael.Duheme" <Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca <Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, "kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com> On 6/17/23, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. > https://www.cbc.ca/news/ > > Bilingual cities and towns in Quebec join forces to mount legal > challenge to Bill 96 > > Mayors say they're concerned about their municipalities' futures > Holly Cabrera · CBC News · Posted: Jun 08, 2023 5:00 AM ADT > > "Human rights lawyer Pearl Eliadis called the municipalities' legal > approach "more creative" because it doesn't mainly rely on challenging > the province's pre-emptive use of the notwithstanding clause of the > Canadian Constitution." > > https://www.rights-law.net/ > > Montreal, Quebec (Canada). Please call or email for courier delivery. > > @ info@rights-law.net > > Tel +1 514 344-5431 (office) > > Fax: +1 514 739-0308 > > Skype: Pearl.Eliadis > > > I believe Mitchell Brownstein should talk to the RCMP What say you? > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Mitchell Brownstein <mbrownstein@cotesaintluc.org> > Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2023 19:03:47 +0000 > Subject: Re: Anna Gainey should remember this email EH Mr Housefather??? > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. > > David, > > I listened to you for 9 minutes on a Saturday, and you still have not > told me what you would like me to do? > > Mitch > > Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg > ______________________________ > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. > Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2023 2:37:51 PM > To: Mitchell Brownstein <mbrownstein@cotesaintluc.org> > Subject: Fwd: Anna Gainey should remember this email EH Mr Housefather??? > > https://davidraymondamos3. > > > Thursday, 15 June 2023 > > Language politics take centre stage in Montreal federal byelection > > > https://www.cbc.ca/news/ > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. > Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 14:59:16 -0300 > Subject: Fwd Attn Adam Rodgers we just talked correct? > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, paulpalango > <paulpalango@protonmail.com>, NightTimePodcast > <NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>, nsinvestigators > <nsinvestigators@gmail.com>, "Pineo, Robert" <rpineo@pattersonlaw.ca>, > adam@adamrodgers.ca > Cc: "Austin, Hon. Kris (JPS/JSP)" <Kris.Austin@gnb.ca>, "Comeau, Mike > (JPS/JSP)" <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, "Désalliers, Judy (ECO/BCE)" > <Judy.Desalliers@gnb.ca>, "Brander, Heather (JPS/JSP)" > <Heather.Brander@gnb.ca>, "Johnston, Michael (JPS/JSP)" > <Michael.Johnston@gnb.ca>, "Oram, George (JPS/JSP)" > <George.Oram@gnb.ca>, "Wetmore, Ross (LEG)" <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, > "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "Williamson, John" > <john.williamson@parl.gc.ca>, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, > "Bobbi-Jean.MacKinnon" <Bobbi-Jean.MacKinnon@cbc.ca>, "Michael.Duheme" > <Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca > <Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Bill.Blair" > <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, provincial.archives@gnb.ca, gazette@gnb.ca, > oldmaison@yahoo.com, "Coroner (JPS/JSP)" <Coroner@gnb.ca> > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:42:03 -0400 > Subject: Attn Adam Rodgers we just talked correct? > To: Adam@boudrotrodgers.com, "lyle.howe" <lyle.howe@eastlink.ca> > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> > <myson333@yahoo.com> > > https://boudrotrodgers.com/ > > > Adam Rodgers was called to the Nova Scotia Bar in 2005. Prior to > joining Boudrot Rodgers, Adam completed his articles with a major > Atlantic Canadian law firm in Halifax, before returning to Guysborough > to practice in his home area. Adam practices Commercial and Personal > Injury Litigation, Municipal Law, Criminal Defense, Divorce & Family > Law, as well as Real Estate and Corporate Commercial. > > Adam is active in sports, having played competitive fastpitch softball > on a local and national level. He volunteers as President of the > Strait Pirates Jr. B Hockey team, and is Past-President of the Strait > Area Chamber of Commerce. Adam is a past executive member of the Board > of Directors of the Mulgrave Road Theatre in Guysborough. > > Adam is the President of the Strait Area Barristers’ Society, and a > member of the Atlantic Provinces Trial Lawyers Association (APTLA) and > the American Association for Justice. > > You can follow Adam on Twitter @adamrodgersNS > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com > Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400 > Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., > To: coi@gnb.ca > Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com > > Good Day Sir > > After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed > to speak to one of your staff for the first time > > Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who > answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt > at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker > Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document. > > These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I > suggested that you study closely. > > This is the docket in Federal Court > > http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj. > > These are digital recordings of the last three hearings > > Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/ > > January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/ > > April 3rd, 2017 > > https://archive.org/details/ > > > This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal > > http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj. > > > The only hearing thus far > > May 24th, 2017 > > https://archive.org/details/ > > > This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity > > Date: 20151223 > > Docket: T-1557-15 > > Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015 > > PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell > > BETWEEN: > > DAVID RAYMOND AMOS > > Plaintiff > > and > > HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN > > Defendant > > ORDER > > (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on > December 14, 2015) > > The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to > the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November > 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim > in its entirety. > > At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a > letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then > capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian > Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg, > (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter > he stated: > > As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the > work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you. > You are your brother’s keeper. > > Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former > colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to > expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of > people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses > or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to > me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime > Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former > Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of > Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore; > former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former > Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff > Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court > of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired > Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted > Police. > > In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my > personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many > potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am > of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I > hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in > Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al, > [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding > allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has > requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so. > > > AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of > the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There > is no order as to costs. > > “B. Richard Bell” > Judge > > > Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment > already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent > to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006. > > I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court > Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the > bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my > lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada? > > "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most > > http://davidraymondamos3. > > 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war > in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to > allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over > five years after he began his bragging: > > January 13, 2015 > This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate > > December 8, 2014 > Why Canada Stood Tall! > > Friday, October 3, 2014 > Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And > Stupid Justin Trudeau? > > > Vertias Vincit > David Raymond Amos > 902 800 0369 > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Kulik, John" <john.kulik@mcinnescooper.com> > Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 17:37:49 +0000 > Subject: McInnes Cooper > To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, > "david.raymond.amos@gmail.com" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> > > Dear Mr. Amos: > > I am General Counsel for McInnes Cooper. If you need to communicate > with our firm, please do so through me. > > Thank you. > > John Kulik > [McInnes Cooper]<http://www. > > John Kulik Q.C. > Partner & General Counsel > McInnes Cooper > > tel +1 (902) 444 8571 | fax +1 (902) 425 6350 > > 1969 Upper Water Street > Suite 1300 > Purdy's Wharf Tower II Halifax, NS, B3J 2V1 > > asst Cathy Ohlhausen | +1 (902) 455 8215 > > > > Notice This communication, including any attachments, is confidential > and may be protected by solicitor/client privilege. It is intended > only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you have > received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by e-mail or > telephone at McInnes Cooper's expense. Avis Les informations contenues > dans ce courriel, y compris toute(s) pièce(s) jointe(s), sont > confidentielles et peuvent faire l'objet d'un privilège avocat-client. > Les informations sont dirigées au(x) destinataire(s) seulement. Si > vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur > par courriel ou par téléphone, aux frais de McInnes Cooper. > > > > On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote: > >> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please >> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob >> >> http://thedavidamosrant. >> ilian.html >> >>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/ >>> >>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must >>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING???? >>> >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch? >>> >>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the >>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball >>> cards? >>> >>> http://archive.org/details/ >>> 6 >>> >>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/ >>> >>> http://www.archive.org/ >>> >>> http://archive.org/details/ >>> >>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006 >>> Senator Arlen Specter >>> United States Senate >>> Committee on the Judiciary >>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building >>> Washington, DC 20510 >>> >>> Dear Mr. Specter: >>> >>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man >>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters >>> raised in the attached letter. >>> >>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap >>> tapes. >>> >>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously. >>> >>> Very truly yours, >>> Barry A. Bachrach >>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403 >>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003 >>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com >>> >> > | |
his name was Gerard along with a woman named Richard called me from
another private number supposedly from Richibucto. The dude tried to
argue with me while playing dumb at the same time. However they did
tell me the first woman who first called today concerned about my
mental health was named Cormier. They knew nothing about Cst Norris
and her call to me 2 months ago yet seemed to know all about the RCMP
false arrest and imprisoment of me in 2008. So I hung up and called
the J Division HQ again.
 | 2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea- 663K View as HTML Scan and download |
Automatic reply: Hey Bruce Fitch Perhaps you should talk to Barbara Whitenect I got a call from one of your minions within "Mental Heath" claiming the RCMP are calling me crazy again
Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada<mcu@justice.gc.ca> | Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 11:55 AM |
| To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | |
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Arif Virani, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be carefully reviewed. We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language. ------------------- Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable Arif Virani, ministre de la Justice et procureur général du Canada.
Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant. | |
Moore, Rob - M.P.<Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca> | Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 11:55 AM |
| To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | |
*This is an automated response*
Thank you for contacting the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. office. We appreciate the time you took to get in touch with our office.
If you did not already, please ensure to include your full contact details on your email and the appropriate staff will be able to action your request. We strive to ensure all constituent correspondence is responded to in a timely manner.
If your question or concern is time sensitive, please call our office: 506-832-4200.
Again, we thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts and concerns.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~ Office of the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. Member of Parliament for Fundy Royal
| |
Hey Bruce Fitch Perhaps you should talk to Barbara Whitenect I got a call from one of your minions within "Mental Heath" claiming the RCMP are calling me crazy again
David Amos<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 11:54 AM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| To: "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, oic-bci@gnb.ca, Charles.Murray@gnb.ca, "hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca>, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, "Hamish.Wright" <Hamish.Wright@gnb.ca>, keriess@postmedia.com, Eric.Mallet@gnb.ca, Arlene.Dunn@gnb.ca, Greg.Turner@gnb.ca, Daniel.J.Allain@gnb.ca, Ryan.Cullins@gnb.ca, Richard.Ames@gnb.ca, Margaret.Johnson@gnb.ca, Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca, Rene.Legacy@gnb.ca, "robert.mckee" <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "pierre.poilievre" <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore" <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, "robert.gauvin" <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca, "Nathalie.G.Drouin" <Nathalie.G.Drouin@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, "Michael.Duheme" <Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Kevin.leahy" <Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet" <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca> | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "barb.whitenect" <barb.whitenect@gnb.ca>, fred.phelps@casw-acts.ca, "bruce.fitch" <bruce.fitch@gnb.ca>, erika.hachey@mosshacheylaw.com, Robert.Weir@gnb.ca, "Bill.Oliver" <Bill.Oliver@gnb.ca> | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In response I called the RCMP and your office again Correct? Deja Vu Anyone? https://www.youtube.com/watch? Me,Myself and I David Amos https://www.youtube.com/watch? RCMP Sussex New Brunswick David Amos https://www.youtube.com/watch? RCMP and the Fat Fred City Finest David Amos https://www.youtube.com/watch? RCMP in Fat Fred City Pt 1 David Amos https://www.youtube.com/watch? RCMP in Fat Fred City Pt 2 David Amos https://www.youtube.com/watch? Speak of the Devil and Cst. Mark Blakely of the RCMP appears David Amos https://www.casw-acts.ca/en/ Barbara Whitenect, RSW The CASW Award is given in recognition of outstanding contributions to the field of social welfare and for the profession of social work in Canada. It is hard to think of someone more deserving than Barbara Whitenect. Barb obtained her Bachelor of Social Work at St. Thomas University in 1991 and followed that by obtaining her Masters of Social Work from Carleton University in 1992. Barb has been a member in good standing with the NBASW since 1992. She has been actively involved with the provincial NBASW since 2007first as vice-president. Barb is currently the President of the NBASW and represents the NBASW on the national and international front with her active involvement with CASW, CCSWR and ASWB. She has been a key player in leading NBASW to adopt its first Scope of Practice. Barb identifies herself as a social worker at every opportunity. She has provided social work education to social work students – both by teaching at St. Thomas University and by supporting field placement opportunities for students within her workplace. Barb is currently employed in a Director`s Position for the Department of Health, attached to the Central Office Mental Health Services for New Brunswick. By her many skills and knowledge, Barb is often solicited by her peers to be involved with and take on various projects around the province and even on a National level. She is a great leader for our membership and staff of NBASW, her ongoing involvement has brought our Association to a higher level of both administrative issues and constructive political working relationships. Barb represents social work proudly and is dedicated to the advancement of the profession and she is an inspiration to many of us. It is for this reason that she is the ideal candidate for the 2013 CASW Distinguished Service Award. For further information: Fred Phelps, MSW, RSW, CAE CASW Executive Director Tel: 613-793-2012 E-mail: fred.phelps@casw-acts.ca https://davidraymondamos3. Thursday, 10 August 2023 Conservatives launch massive ad campaign amid surge in polls https://www.cbc.ca/news/ Conservatives launch massive ad campaign amid surge in polls Multimillion-dollar ad buy comes as polling shows Tories as much as 10 points ahead of Liberals Kate McKenna, Hannah Thibedeau · CBC News · Posted: Aug 09, 2023 2:25 PM ADT Conservatives reintroduce Pierre Poilievre with $3M ad campaign Duration 1:58 The Conservative Party of Canada is reintroducing leader Pierre Poilievre to Canadians with a $3 million ad campaign that some insiders say is a move to rebrand him with a softer image. The Conservative Party of Canada is launching a multimillion-dollar ad campaign that depicts its leader, Pierre Poilievre, as a family man who wants to fix the country — all while his party is soaring in the polls and his main rival is going through a public split with his spouse. "This is not a branding campaign. This is an amplification of who Pierre is and always has been," said Regan Watts, a former adviser to several ministers in the Harper government. "He's warm, he's kind, he's empathetic and he listens… It's important for people to delineate between Parliament Hill and the rest of the country, engaging with Canadians one-on-one. " Two of the three ads focus on showing a more human side of Poilievre, whose aggressive, bulldog style has seen him spar with journalists and politicians alike, prompting Maclean's magazine to ask "Why is Pierre Poilievre so angry?" A senior Conservative source confirmed to CBC News that the party will spend more than $3 million over three months to push three bilingual ads in every province and territory. The ads will air on TV, radio, digital platforms and print media. Polling analyst Éric Grenier, the author of TheWrit.ca, says the timing of the campaign makes sense. "Usually when there is a new leader in place and Canadians don't know a lot about them, there is an attempt to try to make them seem more like a likable person," he said. The first ad features voice-over from Poilievre's wife, Anaida, a Montreal-raised Venezuelan immigrant who has been described in a Quebec newspaper as Poilievre's "hidden ace" in Quebec. "Who is Pierre Poilievre?" she narrates, before showing the Conservative leader at different stages of his life, including playing hockey while growing up in Calgary, and playing with his own children. "And I know him as a guy who loves me for who I am," she says in the ad. "A Canadian, who came to call Canada home, and his wife." It was released less than a week after Justin Trudeau's high-profile separation from his wife, Sophie Grégoire Trudeau. The second ad shows Poilievre sitting with his son, doing a puzzle. "Everything feels broken in Canada. Unaffordable, unsafe, divided. But we can put the pieces back together," he says in voice-over. The third ad is an attack on the carbon tax, which Poilievre says he would undo if elected. A spokesperson for Poilievre did not respond to a request for comment about the ad campaign. A surge in polls This ad campaign comes while the party surges in the polls. "All the national polling that we've seen over the last few months have given the Conservatives a wide lead, sometimes as wide as 10 points, and that has increased over the last few months," Grenier said. "The question is whether it's going to hold into the fall." It also comes weeks after he ditched his tie and glasses for a more casual look, which some strategists say could signal an effort to present a more laid-back, likable version of himself. Pierre Poilievre drops the glasses as part of an image revamp These ads could be an appeal to women — a key demographic Conservatives are trying to court, says Grenier. "The Conservatives in general poll less well among women than they do among men… For Pierre Poilievre, we've seen the same kinds of things. Negatives tend to be a lot higher among women than among men," he said. "This is a way to make him seem less abrasive, less partisan." 'You can change the packaging but not the content:' Rodriguez on latest Poilievre ad blitz Duration 0:36 Reporters asked Transport Minister and Quebec MP Pablo Rodriguez about Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre's latest ad campaign. Rodriguez says that's not something Quebeckers want. Canada's Transport Minister Pablo Rodriguez was asked about the new ad campaign and said he doesn't believe the ads will sway people, particularly in his home province of Quebec. "You can change the packaging if you want, you can change the packaging, but not the contents," he said. "The content is not something that Quebecers want." 'Money to burn' Though the $3-million price tag might seem expensive, the Conservative Party of Canada is out-fundraising its rivals — by a lot. From April to June alone, the Tories raised nearly $8 million in donations, a slight decrease from the $8.3 million the party raised during the first three months of the year. That's more than double what the Liberals raised in the same window of time. "They have lots of money to burn," said Grenier. "The gap in fundraising over the last six months between the two parties is the biggest it's ever been … which gives them an advantage between elections that the Liberals and New Democrats simply don't have." The Conservative faithful will be gathering in Quebec City from Sept. 7 -9 for their annual convention. The website notes it's the first in-person convention since 2018. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Kate McKenna Kate McKenna is a senior reporter with CBC News. She is based in the parliamentary bureau. kate.mckenna@cbc.ca. Follow Kate on Twitter CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices 6369 Comments Bill Von Smith It will be nice when Justin is gone and Canada is not an international joke. Don Corey Reply to Bill Von Smith Oh so true! Taseko Tom Reply to Bill Von Smith P.P. is the laughingstock of the CPC , so there is that. Don Corey Reply to Taseko Tom Dream on.... David Amos Reply to Bill Von Smith I second that emotion ---------- Original message ---------- From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 09:06:58 -0300 Subject: Re The coverup of the the actions of the Fredericton Police Force, the RCMP and Manoj Bhargava against me To: erika.hachey@mosshacheylaw.com Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Erika R. Hachey Called to the bar: 2013 (NB) erika.hachey@mosshacheylaw.com Andrew C.W. Moss Called to the bar: 2015 (NB) Email: andrew.moss@mosshacheylaw.com Moss Hachey Law 90 Woodside Lane, Suite 103 Fredericton, New Brunswick E3C 2R9 Phone: 506-449-7544 Fax: 506-300-2072 https://www.cbc.ca/news/ "Referring complaints to police Schollenberg said the college involved the police recently, after suspending Bhargava. "It became apparent that there may be more to this," he said. He said the college asked some of the 18 complainants if they were interested in speaking to the police and passed on their information to the Fredericton Police Force if they said yes. Fredericton psychiatrist suspended by College of Physicians and Surgeons Alycia Bartlette, spokesperson for the Fredericton Police Force, would not confirm whether the police are investigating Bhargava. "In general, we would not confirm whether a specific individual was the subject of a police investigation until such time as charges are laid in court, or there are operational reasons otherwise," she said in an email." >>> From: "Ross, Ken (DH/MS)" <ken.ross@gnb.ca> >>> Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 08:43:31 -0300 >>> Subject: Re: Hey Ken Who is Mental Health's and the Hospital in >>> Fredericton's lawyers? >>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com >>> >>> Got your messages Dave. I am in Toronto for meetings and will be back >>> in the office Friday. I will ask Barb Whitenect to follow up with you >>> in the interim. Yes Herby picked up ypur bike a while back. >>> >>> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld >>> >>> >>> --- On Wed, 7/9/08, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >>> Subject: Hey Ken Who is Mental Health's and the Hospital in >>> Fredericton's lawyers? >>> To: ken.ross@gnb.ca, Barbara.Whitenect@gnb.ca, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca >>> Cc: rosaire.santerre@gnb.ca, Marc.Pitre@gnb.ca, David.Eidt@gnb.ca, >>> oldmaison@yahoo.com, Judy.Cyr@gnb.ca, t.j.burke@gnb.ca, >>> police@fredericton.ca, Carrie.Levesque@gnb.ca, anne.elgee@gnb.ca, >>> danny.copp@fredericton.ca, jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >>> Date: Wednesday, July 9, 2008, 3:03 AM >>> >>> KENNETH ROSS, Assistant Deputy Minister >>> Addictions and Mental Health Services / Health >>> Contact Information >>> Phone: (506) 457-4800 >>> Fax: (506) 453-5243 >>> >>> BARBARA WHITENECT, Director >>> Addictions and Mental Health Services / Health >>> Contact Information >>> Phone: (506) 444-4442 >>> Fax: (506) 453-8711 >>> EMail Address: Barbara.Whitenect@gnb.ca >>> >>> >>> Sorry to involve you but lets just say that I am really really pissed >>> off for very justifiable reasons. >>> >>> This should prove to some folks that at least I know how to read. >>> >>> http://www.ahsc.health.nb.ca/ >>> >>> I have no doubt whatsoever that you would more pissed than I am if >>> the malicious bullshit that happened to me last weekend had happened >>> to you. >>> >>> I will try to call you in business hours but I suspect in the end I >>> will wind up arguing this dude in court in short order. (On a lighter >>> note did Herby pick up my bike?) >>> >>> David Eidt >>> Legal Services >>> Office of the Attorney General >>> Tel: (506) 453-3964 >>> Fax: (506) 453-3275 >>> david.eidt@gnb.ca >>> >>> Best Regards >>> Dave >>> >>> >>> These emails and the bullshit from the news last year should to all >>> that I am as serious as a heart attack and far from mentally unstabe >>> but the cops have proven themselves to be monumental liars many times >>> >>> Subject: >>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400 >>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca >>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com >>> >>> >>> January 30, 2007 >>> >>> >>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE >>> >>> Mr. David Amos >>> >>> >>> Dear Mr. Amos: >>> >>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29, >>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP. >>> >>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have >>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve >>> Graham of the RCMP "J" Division in Fredericton. >>> >>> Sincerely, >>> >>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy >>> Minister of Health >>> >>> CM/cb >>> >>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote: >>> >>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500 >>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca, >>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net, >>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com >>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com, >>> John.Foran@gnb.ca, Oda.B@parl.gc.ca, >>> "Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, >>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has >>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have n >>> >>> Dear Mr. Amos, >>> >>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off over >>> the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I was not >>> ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns. >>> >>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position >>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process >>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the >>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these >>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this >>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done. >>> >>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false >>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear that >>> Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada and the >>> US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment policing in >>> Petitcodiac, NB. >>> >>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on >>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors. >>> >>> Sincerely, >>> >>> Warren McBeath, Cpl. >>> GRC Caledonia RCMP >>> Traffic Services NCO >>> Ph: (506) 387-2222 >>> Fax: (506) 387-4622 >>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >>> >>> charles leblanc oldmaison@yahoo.com wrote: >>> >>> Where are ya living now???? Since the media seem to ignore ya? I'll >>> sit down for a debate with a recorder for the blog...Now? Don't get >>> all exicted and send this all over the world.....lol >>> >>> ----- Original Message ---- >>> From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com >>> To: brad.woodside@fredericton.ca; whalen@fredericton.ca; >>> david.kelly@fredericton.ca; cathy.maclaggan@fredericton.ca >>> stephen.kelly@fredericton.ca; tom.jellinek@fredericton.ca; >>> scott.mcconaghy@fredericton.ca >>> walter.brown@fredericton.ca; norah.davidson@fredericton.ca; >>> mike.obrien@fredericton.ca; bruce.grandy@fredericton.ca; >>> dan.keenan@fredericton.ca; jeff.mockler@gnb.ca; >>> mrichard@lawsociety-barreau. >>> jlmockler@mpor.ca; scotta@parl.gc.ca; michael.bray@gnb.ca; >>> jack.e.mackay@gnb.ca >>> Cc: news@dailygleaner.com; kcarmichael@bloomberg.net; >>> oldmaison@yahoo.com; advocacycollective@yahoo.com; >>> Easter.W@parl.gc.ca; Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca; cityadmin@fredericton.ca; >>> info@gg.ca; bmosher@mosherchedore.ca; rchedore@mosherchedore.ca; >>> police@fredericton.ca; chebert@thestar.ca; Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca; >>> Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca; Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca; alltrue@nl.rogers.com; >>> Harper.S@parl.gc.ca; Layton.J@parl.gc.ca; Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca; >>> Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 10:37:04 PM >>> Subject: I promised one of the Fat Fred City cop Randy Reilly that I >>> would try to make him famous >>> >>> http://www.youtube.com/ >>> >>> A man is only as good as his word EH? To bad priests, bankers, >>> politicians, lawyers and cops can't claim the same N'est Pas >>> >>> http://actionlyme.org/FBI_ >>> >>> FEDERAL EXPRESS February 7, 2006 >>> >>> Senator Arlen Specter >>> United States Senate >>> Committee on the Judiciary >>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building >>> Washington, DC 20510 >>> >>> Dear Mr. Specter: >>> >>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man >>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters >>> raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that >>> these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in >>> contact with you about this previously. >>> >>> Very truly yours, >>> Barry A. Bachrach >>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403 >>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003 >>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com >>> >>> >>> >>> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/ >>> >>> Paulette Delaney-Smith Paulette.Delaney-Smith@rcmp- >>> David, >>> >>> I received your voice mail, I have been transferred to another unit >>> and I am unaware of who is dealing with your complaints at this time. >>> >>> Paulette Delaney-Smith, Cpl. >>> RCMPolice "J" DIvision HQ >>> >>> >>> >>> http://gypsy-blog.blogspot. >>> >>> Threat against Burke taken seriously >>> >>> By STEPHEN LLEWELLYN >>> dgleg@nb.aibn.com >>> Published Thursday May 24th, 2007 >>> Appeared on page A1 >>> An RCMP security detail has been guarding Justice Minister and >>> Attorney General T.J. Burke because of threats made against him >>> recently. >>> >>> Burke, the Liberal MLA for Fredericton-Fort Nashwaaksis, wouldn't >>> explain the nature of the threats. >>> >>> "I have had a particular individual or individuals who have made >>> specific overtures about causing harm towards me," he told reporters >>> Wednesday. >>> >>> "The RCMP has provided security to me recently by accompanying me to a >>> couple of public functions where the individual is known to reside or >>> have family members in the area," said Burke. "It is nice to have >>> some >>> added protection and that added comfort." >>> >>> The RCMP provides protection to the premier and MLAs with its VIP >>> security >>> unit. >>> >>> Burke didn't say when the threat was made but it's believed to have >>> been in recent weeks. >>> >>> "When a threat is posed to you and it is a credible threat, you have >>> to be cautious about where you go and who you are around," he said. >>> "But again, I am more concerned about my family as opposed to my own >>> personal safety." >>> >>> Burke said he doesn't feel any differently and he has not changed his >>> pattern of activity. >>> >>> "It doesn't bother me one bit," he said. "It makes my wife >>> feel awful nervous." >>> >>> Burke served in an elite American military unit before becoming a >>> lawyer and going into politics in New Brunswick. >>> >>> "(I) have taken my own precautions and what I have to do to ensure my >>> family's safety," he said. "I am a very cautious person in >>> general due >>> to my background and training. >>> >>> "I am comfortable with defending myself or my family if it ever had to >>> happen." >>> >>> Burke said it is not uncommon for politicians to have security concerns. >>> >>> "We do live unfortunately in an age and in a society now where threats >>> have to be taken pretty seriously," he said. >>> >>> Since the terrorism attacks in the United States on Sept. 11, 2001, >>> security in New Brunswick has been >>> beefed up. >>> >>> Metal detectors were recently installed in the legislature and all >>> visitors are screened. >>> >>> The position of attorney general is often referred to as the >>> province's "top cop." >>> >>> Burke said sometimes people do not differentiate between his role as >>> the manager of the justice system and the individual who actually >>> prosecutes them. >>> >>> "With the job sometimes comes threats," he said. "I have had >>> numerous >>> threats since Day 1 in office." >>> >>> Burke said he hopes his First Nations heritage has nothing to do with >>> it. >>> >>> "I think it is more of an issue where people get fixated on a matter >>> and they believe you are personally responsible for assigning them >>> their punishment or their sanction," he said. >>> >>> Is the threat from someone who was recently incarcerated? >>> >>> "I probably shouldn't answer that," he replied. >>> >>> Reporters asked when the threat would be over. >>> >>> "I don't think a threat ever passes once it has been made," said >>> Burke. "You have to consider the credibility of the source." >>> >>> Bruce Fitch, former justice minister in the Conservative government, >>> said "every now and again there would be e-mails that were not >>> complimentary." >>> >>> "I did have a meeting with the RCMP who are in charge of the security >>> of the MLAs and ministers," said Fitch. >>> >>> "They look at each and every situation." >>> >>> Fitch said he never had bodyguards assigned to him although former >>> premier Bernard Lord and former health minister Elvy Robichaud did >>> have extra security staff assigned on occasion. >>> >>> He said if any MLA felt threatened, he or she would discuss it with the >>> RCMP. >> Attn Justice Minister Kris Austin Commissioner Michael Duheme and Sgt. Maxime Babineau I have had enough of RCMP harassment
Methinks your hero Donald Trump and Erin O'Toole should have a long talk about Biden and Trudeau before Hillary steps up to the plate again N'esy Pas April LaJune???
YO Madame Lajune Wherefore everything in Heaven and Hell is done in threes I called you and your pal Mr Flint 3 times just like I did with your lawyer long ago N'esy Pas Mr Trump???
---------- Original message ---------- From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 11:50:37 -0400 Subject: Constable Marc-Etienne Bernard of the RCMP called me yesteday from 506-857-2400 To: lcostabile@icloud.com, marc-etienne.bernard@rcmp-grc. premier <premier@gnb.ca>, "Holland, Mike (LEG)" <mike.holland@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "dominic.leblanc.c1" <dominic.leblanc.c1@parl.gc.ca <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "jeff.carr" <jeff.carr@gnb.ca>, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, "Ginette.PetitpasTaylor" <Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl. "Sherry.Wilson" <Sherry.Wilson@gnb.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore" <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail. washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, info@libertarian.on.ca, premier@ontario.ca https://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/en/ J Division RCMP Headquarters 1445 Regent Street Fredericton, N.B.. E3B 4Z8. Phone. 506-452-3400 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca> Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 15:33:22 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks CBC, Trudeau, Biden, Justice Canada, CRA, IRS, RCMP, FBI, DHS, INTERPO & legions of cops, lawyers, politicians and bible-pounders cannot deny that I am a my of my word EH Higgy? To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued. You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read, reviewed and taken into consideration. There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a response may take several business days. Thanks again for your email. ______ Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations. Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons. Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre. Merci encore pour votre courriel. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Unicorn Lady <lcostabile@icloud.com> Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 08:40:28 -0500 Subject: Re: RE Hello is this David? To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> The RCMP is there a website I can get the number from if you don’t mind? . > On Nov 8, 2021, at 10:08 AM, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote: > > Call the FBI and the RCMP > >> On 11/7/21, Unicorn Lady <lcostabile@icloud.com> wrote: >> Hey David, >> >> I used a text number in case you weren’t the real person. Would it be ok if >> I called you blocked on my real number? >> >> Shangi basically is threatening to rape and kill me and a few other womens >> children. I am trying to pursue a charge on him. I am also trying to get his >> computer looked into in his country because he has said some pedophilic >> comments online on public streams and I am concerned. >> >> . >> >> >>>> On Nov 7, 2021, at 1:49 AM, Unicorn Lady <lcostabile@icloud.com> wrote: >>> >>> How would someone like me (in America) press charges on him? >>> >>> . >>> >>> >>>> On Nov 7, 2021, at 12:27 AM, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> https://archive.org/details/ >>>> >>>> >>>> https://archive.org/details/ >>>> >>>> >>>> https://davidraymondamos3. >>>> >>>> >>>> 75. The Plaintiff states that the RCMP is well aware of the libel, >>>> sexual harassment, and death threats practiced against his family that >>>> have been published on the Internet since 2005 by fans (Trolls) who >>>> supported Byron Prior. Four Trolls who live in Alberta are Barry >>>> Winters, Dean Roger Ray, Eddy Achtem and Patrick Doran They have many >>>> “Anonymous” cohorts throughout Canada, the USA and the United Kingdom. >>>> The actions of these Trolls created an important example of >>>> cyberbullying. Law enforcement officials have ignored these Trolls >>>> because of the Plaintiff’s standing as a whistleblower exposing >>>> corruption within the justice system. The Plaintiff is aware that >>>> several people complained about their actions over the years. In fact >>>> the mother of Dean Roger Ray recently her indignation in Barry >>>> Winter’s blog. Complaints about Barry Winters can be seen on the >>>> Internet by Glen Canning and Professor Kris Wells, two politically >>>> well-connected people who complain of cyberbullying often. Proof the >>>> Edmonton Police Force (EPS), RCMP, FBI and police in the UK have been >>>> ignoring the Plaintiff’s complaints about these Trolls can also viewed >>>> on the Internet. The Plaintiff fought fire with fire but did so in a >>>> legal fashion and kept the police fully informed of his actions. The >>>> Plaintiff was successful in causing numerous egregious videos and >>>> several blogs to be taken down after doing his best to find out who >>>> the “Anonymous” people were and reporting them. He saved all the blogs >>>> and videos published about his family before the malice was removed >>>> from public view. Three Trolls who continue to attack his family and >>>> others are Dean Roger Ray, Barry Winters and one government employee. >>>> A member of the legal dept. of Edmonton tried to claim that the >>>> Plaintiff was Barry Winters then complained to the EPS about the >>>> Plaintiff’s questions about her incompetence. Professor Kris Wells, >>>> who was associated with the Police Commission of Edmonton and Glen >>>> Canning, who lost his daughter to cyberbullying, said nothing. They >>>> were content that the Plaintiff managed to convince Google’s lawyers >>>> to remove one of Barry Winters’s blogs on October 23, 2014 and say >>>> nothing about his blog within WordPress that the Troll uses to >>>> continue his libel of them and their friends. Instead Glen Canning >>>> slandered the Plaintiff within Twitter after Kris Wells sent the >>>> Plaintiff an email stating his lawyer had advised him to ignore Barry >>>> Winters and his blogs. >>>> >>>> 76. The Plaintiff states that since the fall of 2014 he has given up >>>> on the notion that any police officer or Glen Canning and Professor >>>> Kris Wells would ever act with any semblance of integrity. All their >>>> actions appear to be for the purposes of self-promotion and personal >>>> gain. Canning and Wells received the same emails that were sent to >>>> politicians and law enforcement authorities and only Barry Winters >>>> responded to all and disputed the Plaintiff’s words. The EPS in June >>>> of 2015 informed the Plaintiff that they intend to prosecute Barry >>>> Winters for sending “False Messages” instead of prosecuting for his >>>> published malice under Sections 300 and 319 of the Criminal Code. That >>>> fact must be true because since June the Plaintiff has not received >>>> any emails from Barry Winters and within his blog he has slandered the >>>> EPS and often mentions the topic of “False Messages”. In the meantime >>>> Canning and Wells ignore the Plaintiff’s common concerns while >>>> continuing to profess of their abundant knowledge of bullying to >>>> university students and anyone else who will listen to them >>>> particularly members of the corporate media. The Plaintiff saves every >>>> word of Canning and Wells that they cause to be published on the topic >>>> cyberbullying and plans to file them as his exhibits to support a >>>> lawsuit to seek relief from the cyberbullying of his Clan. He >>>> considers the blogs of Barry Winters and the videos of his associates >>>> that remain published on the Internet to be important evidence of >>>> cyberbullying that the Crown will be arguing within a provincial court >>>> of his choice after the election of the 42nd Parliament. Therefore >>>> other than remind the Crown and others that he is recording the work >>>> of the Trolls, he has not reported their malice to Google and >>>> WordPress anymore because the RCMP should have done so long ago. >>>> >>>> 77. The Plaintiff states that in June of 2015 when a member of the >>>> EPS called him four times with an anonymous telephone number asking >>>> him to stop emailing public officials about Barry Winters’s blog and >>>> to file a formal complaint. The Plaintiff was offended by the >>>> anonymous talk of “False Messages”. He refused and stated that if the >>>> questionable public officials found his emails quoting the blog of >>>> Barry Winters upsetting then the EPS and the RCMP should uphold the >>>> law and do something about it in order to protect their reputations. >>>> >>>> 78. The Plaintiff states that until the EPS member clearly identified >>>> himself with his badge number in the fourth phone call and sent a >>>> follow up email to back up his words, the Plaintiff could not know for >>>> certain that a Troll or the EPS had been calling him. The Plaintiff >>>> has a record of two fraudulent calls to him during the same period of >>>> time, one using an RCMP phone number and the other used the phone >>>> number of Dana Durnford, a well-known Troll and friend of Byron Prior. >>>> The Plaintiff returned the calls. Dana Durnford in a predictable >>>> fashion denied knowing him and hung up but the Plaintiff did discuss >>>> the malice of Trolls with an ethical member of the RCMP. The RCMP and >>>> the FBI know that anyone can access several websites based in the USA >>>> and engage their free services to harass people with. The RCMP know >>>> that some programs allow cyberbullies to pretend to be anyone by >>>> having their telephone numbers (including that of the RCMP or the EPS) >>>> appear on their victims’ phone display. The Crown knows commercial >>>> programs assist in political deceit. Recently, it sent a former >>>> assistant of the MP the Plaintiff ran against Fundy-Royal in 2004 to >>>> jail because of robo calls. >>>> >>>> 79. The Plaintiff states that he has clearly explained his intentions >>>> to sue the EPS and the RCMP many times because they have been ignoring >>>> his complaints for eight years. It was obvious to him what the EPS was >>>> trying to do with him in June was trick. The RCMP has been trying to >>>> pull the same trick on the Plaintiff since 2003. The Crown knows that >>>> if the EPS managed to secure a complaint with the Plaintiff’s >>>> signature then it would delay his lawsuit because the EPS could claim >>>> that his complaint under investigation and that the EPS could say >>>> nothing about it until the matter had concluded. The Plaintiff >>>> informed the EPS that anyone could use an anonymous phone number and >>>> claim to be anyone if it wished to talk then it should do so from an >>>> identifiable telephone line or put it in writing just like he does. In >>>> fact the Plaintiff’s family have been getting anonymous calls for many >>>> years and the police claimed they could do nothing because the >>>> malicious calls came through the Internet. The RCMP would have acted >>>> ethically if the families of public officials were subject to the >>>> harassment his Clan has suffered instead of assisting in the illegal >>>> barring from the parliamentary properties of Canada. >>>> >>>> 80. The Plaintiff states that the subject of the Crown and Internet >>>> harassment became incredibly worse in 2007 long before the demise of >>>> two Canadian teenagers caused new cyber laws to be created and >>>> promptly ignored. In 2008 while the Plaintiff’s family and friends >>>> were being much harassed within many YouTube Channels by Trolls, the >>>> RCMP in NB created a YouTube channel of its own to use as tool to >>>> catch a local arsonist. As soon as the Plaintiff made a comment about >>>> eleven incidents of arson on his friend’s farm in the same area the >>>> Plaintiff and his friend were attacked by many Troll’s within the >>>> Crown’s domain within YouTube and the RCMP only laughed at the obvious >>>> malice that they were publishing for a year without attempting to >>>> moderate the comments. In early 2009 the comments within the RCMP >>>> YouTube channel change greatly with the arrest and imprisonment of >>>> members of the Tingley family pertaining to charges of “Organized >>>> Crime”. The libel continued until Werner Bock printed all the comments >>>> within the RCMP YouTube channel and delivered hard copy of it in hand >>>> to a local office of the RCMP. Once the Plaintiff had a conversation >>>> with a member of the RCMP in Moncton NB who was investigating Bock’s >>>> complaint, the RCMP took down their video with all the comments and >>>> said nothing further about it. The Plaintiff did manage to save most >>>> of the comments digitally before they were deleted by the Trolls and >>>> the RCMP. Years later the Crown stayed the “Organized Crime” charges >>>> against the Tingleys and a publication ban was placed on their >>>> concerns about malicious prosecution. The matter was put before the >>>> Supreme Court of Canada Rodney Tingley, et al. v. Her Majesty the >>>> Queen SCC Docket no. 34107 and the Plaintiff had no idea of any >>>> outcome. However in late 2014 he did speak with some of the Tingleys >>>> and they admitted to knowing about him and his common concerns with >>>> the RCMP. One Tingley stated that their lawyers have advised them not >>>> to speak to him because of the publication ban. The same holds true >>>> with his former friend Werner Bock and Hank Temper another German who >>>> moved to NB to farm. They had trouble with the RCMP acting against >>>> them. A search on the Internet with their names and the Plaintiff’s >>>> easily proves his assistance but they will never acknowledge it as >>>> they attack the Crown, Bock byway of social media and Tepper byway of >>>> lawsuit. >>>> >>>> 81. The Plaintiff states that matters of harassment that the police >>>> refuse to investigate would have entered the realm of ridiculous in >>>> 2012 if the reasons behind the suicides of teenagers did not become >>>> well known by the corporate media. In the summer of 2012 a new member >>>> of the FPS who as a former member of the EPS had inspired a lawsuit >>>> for beating a client in Edmonton called the Plaintiff and accused him >>>> of something he could not do even if he wanted to while he was arguing >>>> many lawyers byway of emails about a matter concerning cyber stalking >>>> that was before the SCC. The member of the FPF accused the Plaintiff >>>> of calling the boss of Bullying Canada thirty times. At that time his >>>> MagicJack account had been hacked and although he could receive >>>> incoming calls, the Plaintiff could not call out to anyone. The >>>> Plaintiff freely sent the FPF his telephone logs sourced from >>>> MagicJack after his account restored without the Crown having to issue >>>> a warrant to see his telephone records. He asked the FPF and the RCMP >>>> where did the records of his phone calls to and from the FPF and the >>>> RCMP go if his account had not been hacked. The police never >>>> responded. Years later a Troll sent Dean Roger Ray a message through >>>> YouTube providing info about the Plaintiff’s MagicJack account with >>>> the correct password. Dean Roger Ray promptly posted two videos in >>>> YouTube clearly displaying the blatant violation of privacy likely to >>>> protect himself from the crime. The Plaintiff quickly pointed out the >>>> videos to the RCMP and they refused to investigate as usual. At about >>>> the same point in time the Plaintiff noticed that the CBC had >>>> published a record of a access to information requests. On the list of >>>> requests he saw his name along with several employees of CBC and the >>>> boss of Bullying Canada. The Plaintiff called the CBC to make >>>> inquiries about what he saw published on the Internet. CBC told him it >>>> was none of his business and advised him if he thought his rights had >>>> been offended to file a complaint. It appears the Plaintiff that >>>> employees of CBC like other questionable Crown Corporations such as >>>> the RCMP rely on their attorneys far too much to defend them from >>>> litigation they invite from citizens they purportedly serve. The >>>> employees of CBC named within the aforementioned and the CBC Legal >>>> Dept. are very familiar with the Plaintiff and of the Crown barring >>>> him from legislative properties while he running for public office. >>>> >>>> 82. The Plaintiff states that any politician or police officer should >>>> have seen enough of Barry Winter’s WordPress blog by June 22, 2015 >>>> particularly after the very unnecessary demise of two men in Alberta >>>> because of the incompetence of the EPS. Barry Winters was blogging >>>> about the EPS using battering ram in order to execute a warrant for a >>>> 250 dollar bylaw offence at the same time Professor Kris Wells >>>> revealed in a televised interview that the EPS member who was killed >>>> was the one investigating the cyber harassment of him. It was obvious >>>> why the police and politicians ignored all the death threats, sexual >>>> harassment, cyberbullying and hate speech of a proud Zionist who >>>> claimed to be a former CF officer who now working for the Department >>>> of National Defence (DND). It is well known that no politician in >>>> Canada is allowed to sit in Parliament as a member of the major >>>> parties unless they support Israel. Since 2002 the Plaintiff made it >>>> well known that he does not support Israeli actions and was against >>>> the American plan to make war on Iraq. On Aril 1, 2003 within two >>>> weeks of the beginning of the War on Iraq, the US Secret Service >>>> threatened to practice extraordinary rendition because false >>>> allegations of a Presidential threat were made against him by an >>>> American court. However, the Americans and the Crown cannot deny that >>>> what he said in two courts on April 1, 2003 because he published the >>>> recordings of what was truly said as soon as he got the court tapes. >>>> The RCMP knows those words can still be heard on the Internet today. >>>> In 2009, the Plaintiff began to complain of Barry Winters about >>>> something far more important to Canada as nation because of Winters’ >>>> bragging of being one of 24 CF officers who assisted the Americans in >>>> the planning the War on Iraq in 2002. In the Plaintiff’s humble >>>> opinion the mandate of the DND is Defence not Attack. He is not so >>>> naive to think that such plans of war do not occur but if Barry >>>> Winters was in fact one of the CF officers who did so then he broke >>>> his oath to the Crown the instant he bragged of it in his blog. If >>>> Winters was never an officer in the CF then he broke the law by >>>> impersonating an officer. The Plaintiff downloaded the emails of the >>>> Privy Council about Wikileaks. The bragging of Barry Winters should >>>> have been investigated in 2009 before CBC reported that documents >>>> released by WikiLeaks supported his information about Canadian >>>> involvement in the War on Iraq. >>>> >>>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war >>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to >>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over >>>> five years after he began his bragging: >>>> >>>> January 13, 2015 >>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate >>>> >>>> December 8, 2014 >>>> Why Canada Stood Tall! >>>> >>>> Friday, October 3, 2014 >>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And >>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau >>>> >>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide >>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts. >>>> >>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien >>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign >>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to >>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were >>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were >>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth >>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for >>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute” >>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind. >>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not >>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a >>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to >>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was >>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But >>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s >>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s >>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic, >>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle >>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway >>>> campaign of 2006. >>>> >>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then >>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the >>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent, >>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament. >>>> >>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling >>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of >>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners >>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a >>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make. >>>> >>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have >>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war. >>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by >>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is >>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of >>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government >>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this >>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a >>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East. >>>> >>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror >>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state” >>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control, >>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The >>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and >>>> essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An >>>> ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear >>>> and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,” >>>> or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of >>>> terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states >>>> “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of >>>> Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an >>>> ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the >>>> Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan. >>>> >>>> One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty >>>> was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the >>>> amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time >>>> denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time >>>> self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of >>>> “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the >>>> G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious >>>> behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister >>>> Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully >>>> cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits >>>> are not. >>>> >>>> Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal >>>> mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the >>>> world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy” >>>> David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security >>>> and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can >>>> and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing >>>> “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war >>>> criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending >>>> tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.” >>>> >>>> In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau >>>> “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and >>>> successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing, >>>> marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian >>>> military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern >>>> equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are >>>> antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five >>>> years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that >>>> won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer. >>>> >>>> My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My >>>> Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin >>>> Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not >>>> served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social >>>> democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and >>>> other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet >>>> these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to >>>> other nations, and then criticize them for doing so. >>>> >>>> Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security, >>>> and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before >>>> shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world. >>>> >>>> Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now >>>> >>>> From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca >>>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400 >>>> Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and >>>> the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still >>>> alive >>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com >>>> >>>> This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received >>>> your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply >>>> to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement. >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> ---------- Original message ---------- >>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >>>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300 >>>> Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the >>>> War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive >>>> To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil, >>>> Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc. >>>> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >>>> dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca, >>>> milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca, >>>> sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari >>>> <smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, >>>> susan@blueskystrategygroup.com >>>> eugene@blueskystrategygroup. >>>> Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice" <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin" >>>> <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower >>>> <whistleblower@ctv.ca> >>>> >>>> I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David >>>> Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's >>>> Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on >>>> CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To >>>> be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested >>>> that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise >>>> if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else >>>> about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact that your >>>> old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English >>>> never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is >>>> interesting though >>>> >>>> http://www. >>>> >>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/ >>>> >>>> Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read >>>> this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about >>>> Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad >>>> Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me. >>>> >>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/ >>>> >>>> The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a >>>> shy political animal >>>> >>>> Veritas Vincit >>>> David Raymond Amos >>>> 902 800 0369 >>>> >>>> Enjoy Mr Weston >>>> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/ >>>> >>>> "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military >>>> brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he >>>> says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping >>>> to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command, >>>> including a Canadian general. >>>> >>>> That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff, >>>> who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000 >>>> U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was >>>> also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped >>>> prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait." >>>> >>>> http://baconfat53.blogspot. >>>> >>>> "I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there >>>> being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends" >>>> demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American >>>> "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying >>>> into the US policy. >>>> >>>> At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my >>>> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning >>>> in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would >>>> report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was >>>> never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there >>>> were deployed WMD. >>>> >>>> Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and >>>> invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were >>>> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation >>>> (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned >>>> about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at >>>> that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil >>>> authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy. >>>> >>>> There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to >>>> its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary >>>> to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that >>>> folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated >>>> upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions >>>> are to met before US troop can redeploy? Prime Minister Jean Chretien >>>> and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of >>>> Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them >>>> correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the >>>> George W Bush administration was onerous >>>> >>>> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian >>>> military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian >>>> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations >>>> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan >>>> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi >>>> operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian >>>> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which >>>> ....not necessarily in that order. " >>>> >>>> You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John >>>> Adams? of the CSE within the DND? >>>> >>>> http://www.socom.mil/ >>>> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>> From: Unicorn Lady <lcostabile@icloud.com> >>>> Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2021 00:15:19 -0400 >>>> Subject: Re: Hello is this David? Yes its me >>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> >>>> >>>> I texted you. I can call you in the afternoon if that’s ok. My kids >>>> are sleeping. My name is Leeza. I live in the US. I found your name by >>>> typing in that scum bag Shangis name on google. >>>> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>> From: Unicorn Lady <lcostabile@icloud.com> >>>> Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2021 23:26:10 -0400 >>>> Subject: Re: Hello is this David? Yes its me >>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> >>>> >>>> I will text you >>>> >>>> . >>>> >>>> >>>>>> On Nov 6, 2021, at 6:13 PM, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 11/5/21, Unicorn Lady <lcostabile@icloud.com> wrote: >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> I am looking for David Amos? If this is him please let me know. I would >>>>>> like >>>>>> to discuss some thing. I believe we are being harassed by the same >>>>>> person. I >>>>>> could really use your help. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you. I hope this reaches you. >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 12:15:33 -0400 Subject: Attn Constable Marc-Etienne Bernard To: marc-etienne.bernard@rcmp-grc. "Holland, Mike (LEG)" <mike.holland@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "dominic.leblanc.c1" <dominic.leblanc.c1@parl.gc.ca <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "jeff.carr" <jeff.carr@gnb.ca>, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, "Ginette.PetitpasTaylor" <Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl. "Sherry.Wilson" <Sherry.Wilson@gnb.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore" <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca> Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 00:29:02 +0000 Subject: RE: Raissa Marks, Executive Director of NBEN picked a bad day to insult me To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Hello, Thank you for taking the time to write. Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed at the earliest opportunity. If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for review and consideration. Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire. En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les meilleurs délais. Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel pour examen et considération. If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at (506) 453-2144 or by email media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144. Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau- Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144 Email/Courriel: premier@gnb.ca/premier. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Carr, Jeff (LEG)" <Jeff.Carr@gnb.ca> Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 00:29:02 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: Raissa Marks, Executive Director of NBEN picked a bad day to insult me To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued. You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read, reviewed and taken into consideration. You may also contact Rose Ann at my Constituency office in Fredericton Junction at RoseAnn.Smith@gnb.ca or by phone at 368-2938. Thanks again for your email. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Petitpas Taylor, Ginette - M.P." <Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl. Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 00:29:17 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: Raissa Marks, Executive Director of NBEN picked a bad day to insult me To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Hello, Thank you for writing. While our office receives a tremendous volume of correspondence, as a Member of Parliament, I appreciate all feedback, positive or negative, on the issues of the day and my team and I carefully track what is on the minds of my constituents. However, because I was elected to serve the people of Moncton-Riverview-Dieppe, priority will be given to correspondence from my constituency. As such, if you haven`t already done so, we appreciate you including your home address, postal code and telephone number in emails, as it helps us better respond to messages or inquiries that require follow-up. In addition, if your inquiry is related to my mandate as the Minister of Official Languages or Minister responsible for ACOA, I invite you to submit your questions/comments to the following email addresses monitored by my ministerial correspondence unit: Official Languages: ministredeslanguesofficielles- ACOA: minister-ministre@acoa-apeca. Once again, thank you for taking the time to write. Regards, Ginette ______________________________ Bonjour, Je vous remercie d’avoir écrit. Bien que notre bureau reçoive un volume considérable de correspondance, en tant que députée, j’apprécie tous les commentaires, positifs ou négatifs, sur les questions d’actualité et mon équipe et moi-même suivons attentivement ce qui est dans l’esprit de mes électeurs. Toutefois, comme j’ai été élue pour servir les gens de Moncton-Riverview-Dieppe, la priorité sera accordée à la correspondance provenant de ma circonscription. Par conséquent, si vous ne l’avez pas déjà fait, nous vous remercions d’inclure votre adresse personnelle, votre code postal et votre numéro de téléphone dans les courriels, car cela nous aide à mieux répondre aux messages ou aux demandes de renseignements qui nécessitent un suivi. De plus, si votre demande est liée à mon mandat de ministre des Langues officielles ou de ministre responsable de l’APECA, je vous invite à soumettre vos questions ou commentaires aux adresses de courriel suivantes, surveillées par mon unité de correspondance ministérielle : Langues officielles : ministredeslanguesofficielles- APÉCA: minister-ministre@acoa-apeca. Encore une fois, merci d’avoir pris le temps d’écrire. Cordialement, Ginette ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: NBEN RENB <nben@nben.ca> Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 11:55:36 -0400 Subject: Re: Raissa Marks, Executive Director of NBEN picked a bad day to insult me To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Cc: marc-etienne.bernard@rcmp-grc. Mr. Amos, You have sent us several unsolicited messages in the past. At this time, we ask that you please refrain from sending us further emails and including the New Brunswick Environmental Network in your subject lines in the future. We have contacted the RCMP and will pursue action with them should this continue. Constable Bernard is copied to this email. Thank you. On Sun, Nov 7, 2021 at 8:29 PM David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote: > > https://nbmediacoop.org/2020/ > > > Throne speech signals Canada’s support for new nuclear reactors, > opposition builds in New Brunswick > > > by Susan O'Donnell — October 2, 2020 > > > Throne speech signals Canada’s support for new nuclear reactors, > opposition builds in New Brunswick > > Protesters at the Global Day of Climate Action outside the office of > New Brunswick Premier Blaine HIggs in Fredericton on Sept. 25. Photo > by Joan Green. > > > For more than a year, renewable energy and anti-nuclear activists in > New Brunswick and across the country have watched nuclear industry > lobbyists re-position their product as the solution to the climate > crisis. Indeed, days before the Throne Speech, federal Natural > Resources minister Seamus O’Regan claimed that nuclear power was > necessary for Canada to meet its net-zero emissions target. > > Given its legacy of toxic radioactive waste, nuclear energy would not > be considered “clean technology” by most Canadians. However the > nuclear industry has been working hard to scrub its image. > > Making nuclear power “clean” was a goal of the December 2019 > memorandum of understanding (MOU) signed by the premiers of New > Brunswick, Ontario and Saskatchewan and more recently, Alberta, to > develop the nuclear industry’s latest offering, so-called “small > modular nuclear reactors” or “SMRs.” > > The MOU committed the parties to “work co-operatively to positively > influence the federal government to provide a clear unambiguous > statement that nuclear energy is a clean technology and is required as > part of the climate change solution.” > > The Throne Speech is evidence the nuclear industry lobby has succeeded. > > On Sept. 23, the Trudeau government promised to “ensure Canada is the > most competitive jurisdiction in the world for clean technology > companies,” to move forward with a “Clean Power Fund,” to invest in > “next-generation clean energy,” and to cut the tax rate in half for > companies making zero-emissions products. > > New Brunswick is expected to be the first province to receive federal > funding for new nuclear reactors. In a shadowy deal, the province and > its public utility NB Power gave $5 million each to two start-up > nuclear energy companies, from the US and UK, that then established > offices in Saint John and applied for federal funding. > > Federal funding for the two companies and their nuclear reactors was a > campaign issue during the recent provincial election. Both the Liberal > and Progressive Conservative party leaders claimed they were the best > person to bring the new reactors to New Brunswick. The week before the > election, Blaine Higgs told Brunswick News he had secured federal > funding for the two companies. > > Both companies plan to develop prototype nuclear reactors next to NB > Power’s Lepreau Nuclear Generating Station on the Bay of Fundy. They > both propose to use a risky process, reprocessing, to open up the > existing irradiated fuel bundles from the Lepreau reactor to make new > fuel for their prototype reactors. Legislation passed by the Trudeau > government exempts the two projects from environmental impact > assessments. > > Opposition is building in the province to the plans for new reactors > in New Brunswick. > > Since last December, the NB Media Co-op has published a series of > commentaries about the risks involved with the proposed nuclear > reactors, information missing from the Government of New Brunswick and > NB Power websites, including the new radioactive wastes produced and > poor economic outcomes. > > In May, the Coalition for Responsible Energy Development in New > Brunswick (CRED-NB) was formed to advocate for a nuclear-free > renewable energy future. In July, the Coalition launched a public > awareness campaign: More Nuclear? No Thanks! > > On Sept. 25, the Global Day of Climate Action, CRED-NB member > Extinction Rebellion New Brunswick (XR NB) organized a rally at the > Fredericton office of the premier, calling for a rapid transition to > renewable energy without more nuclear energy development in the > province. > > Speakers at the rally included David Coon, leader of the New Brunswick > Green Party and MLA for Fredericton South, Ron Tremblay Chief of the > Wolastoq Grand Council, Chris Rouse of New Clear Free Solutions, and > Jessica Spencer and Doug Swain from XR NB. > > National opposition is forming against the federal government’s plans > to support new nuclear reactors. > > Greenpeace Canada stated that including nuclear reactors in the Throne > Speech shows that Minister O’Regan and the Trudeau government “are > suffering from nuclear amnesia.” > > The Sierra Club Canada Foundation started a letter-writing campaign to > minister O’Regan: “Take Action, new nuclear is not part of a path to > net-zero.” > > David Suzuki made headlines with his reaction to O’Regan’s endorsement > of nuclear power: “I want to puke.” > > In the months ahead, renewable energy and anti-nuclear advocates > across the country will be working together to raise public awareness > of the significant risks of developing new nuclear energy instead of > transitioning rapidly to renewable energy to address the climate > crisis. > > Susan O’Donnell is the lead researcher for the Rural Action and Voices > for the Environment (RAVEN) project at the University of New Brunswick > in Fredericton. RAVEN is a member of the Coalition for Responsible > Energy Development in New Brunswick, CRED-NB. > > An earlier version of this article was published by Rabble. > > > > https://nbmediacoop.org/2020/ > > > NB Power’s renewable energy claims disputed [updated] > > by Cortney MacDonnell — July 7, 2020 > > > NB Power’s renewable energy claims disputed [updated] > > Solar panels at work in the winter. Photo from the petition, "Increase > Solar Installations with Direct Solar Incentives," on change.org. > > > NB Power claims to be supplying New Brunswick with over 40 percent > renewable energy but a local solar firm says that is not the case. > > Megan McCann and Mark McCann are co-owners of MJM Solar Solutions. > They have been advocating the use of renewable energy for over a > decade. According to their analysis, NB Power is generating closer to > 20 percent renewable energy in the province. > > In their report that includes a solar plan for New Brunswick released > today, MJM Solar Solutions points out that 13 percent of NB Power’s > 37.1 percent renewable energy profile is biofuels. > > “Biofuels are not a clean energy source,” said Megan McCann. > > While some renewable energy advocates say that biofuels can play a > role in the transition to a cleaner energy future, others note that > biofuels can also be harmful, taking over large areas of land that was > once used for food production and carbon storage. Others questioned > whether biofuels actually cut greenhouse gas emissions. Burning > biomass, as wood or as ethanol or biodiesel, emits carbon dioxide. > > Garth Hood, owner of Thoughtful Dwellings, a consulting and design > company that specializes in energy efficiency, agrees with McCann. > > “All the research I’ve seen recently suggests it causes a lot more > problems than it solves. It’s at best carbon-neutral, but it’s likely > way worse because we’re degrading forests and until we put in place a > system to guarantee sustainable forestry it’s likely going to make our > forestry sector way worse,” said Hood. > > According to Chris Rouse, a senior engineering technologist, “New > Brunswick’s biofuels production is from waste products of the paper > industry, and is not using trees directly.” > > MJM Solar Solutions also take issue with the high percentage of > imports that make up New Brunswick’s renewable energy profile. “NB > Power says they are at 40 percent, but that is not in house, that’s > not in province,” said McCann. > > According to NB Power’s Communications Specialist Marc Belliveau, “We > are due to refresh this info, but we currently have more than 40 > percent renewable energy in the province.” > > “In the coming years, we will certainly be adding even more renewable > and clean energy. How and when is still a work in progress,” said > Belliveau. > > Biofuels are not the only clean energy source being scrutinized. > > NB Power generates much of its renewable energy from the Mactaquac > hydro-electric dam. According to Wolastoq Grand Chief Council Ron > Tremblay, “NB Power did very little, if any, consultation with our > people when our rivers were dammed.” > > “Growing up in Tobique, we noticed that vegetation didn’t grow well > around the hydro wires and transformers,” said Tremblay. > > In recent years, people have mobilized against spraying glyphosate to > kill vegetation not only after a clearcut to grow a softwood > plantation but also around power lines. > > Tremblay has other concerns with hydro dams: “Even the construction of > a dam, how much concrete, how much lubricants are used in that system > to open and shut the dams, the generating systems, the release of the > radioactivity around dams, you can’t call that green. It’s impossible > to call that a green source of energy.” > > For MJM Solar Solutions, a cleaner energy future involves the sun. > > MJM Solar Solutions is requesting signatures to a petition aimed at > achieving a direct solar incentive for New Brunswickers to install > solar. The petition reads: “New Brunswickers want a direct solar > incentive to help with our climate targets, reduce power bills, > stimulate new employment, financial security, and better preparedness > for natural disasters.” > > Cortney MacDonnell is an environmental action reporter with RAVEN > (Rural Action and Voices for the Environment), a research project > based at the University of New Brunswick. > > > > > https://nbmediacoop.org/2018/ > > > Mobilizing to improve the environment in New Brunswick > > by Jennifer Adam > > — November 27, 2018 > > Left to right: Raissa Marks, Executive Director, New Brunswick > Environmental Network; Lois Corbett, Executive Director, Conservation > Council of New Brunswick; Chris Rouse, PEACE-NB; Arthur Melanson, > Janet Gordon, Warren Redman, Save Wetlands Waters and Tourism. Photo > credit: NBEN. > > An “Eco-confluence” event on November 17 brought together more than 35 > groups concerned with the well-being of the province, its citizens, > and its environment, including Nature Trust NB, Voices for Sustainable > Environments and Communities, and Peace NB. The groups are among the > more than 100 members of the New Brunswick Environmental Network > (NBEN) that hosted its annual meeting in New Maryland. The NBEN > provides various platforms for its member groups to gather and > cooperate on issues of common interest. > > Jeff Carr, the new provincial Minister of Environment and Local > Government, spoke at the November NBEN meeting, noting that the agenda > included a discussion about: “When the government has the mandate but > the NGOs have the capacity.” He invited NBEN Executive Director Raissa > Marks to set up meetings with him and the different NBEN member groups > soon to brief him on the key environmental issues they are working on. > > An example of NBEN members gathered together with a common interest, > Marks says, is the low-carbon economy caucus, for whom the NBEN > organized a series of meetings to develop “common messaging that > environmental groups and labour groups could both put forth to the > political parties leading up to the election.” These meetings resulted > in a letter signed by 23 labour and environmental groups sent to the > five political parties of New Brunswick outlining a common directive > toward a low-carbon economy. > > NBEN staff member Annika Chiasson was recently profiled in a video > produced by the NB Media Co-op and the project RAVEN (Rural Action and > Voices for the Environment). Chiasson described how NBEN facilitates > communication among provincial environmental groups. The word > “confluence” in the name of the annual meeting, illustrates what the > NBEN does: they gather, facilitate, and encourage communication > between the many environmental groups in New Brunswick, the > government, and other sectors. > > The NBEN also brings groups together to, for example, cooperate on > increasing the amount of protected land in the province to align more > closely with international goals, and on developing a new Crown Lands > and Forests Act in New Brunswick. Both of these initiatives will have > a strong effect on lands surrounding rural communities in New > Brunswick. > > Currently, New Brunswick has less than five percent of its land area > protected, which is not on target with the international goal set out > by the Convention on Biological Diversity for protection of lands. > This target expects that at least 17 percent of land area and 10 > percent of coastal and marine area is protected by the year 2020; > Canada more generally has only approximately 10 percent of its land > mass protected. The NBEN is helping support organizations such as the > Nature Trust of NB, Conservation Council of New Brunswick, Nature NB, > and the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society to campaign for more > land protection in New Brunswick. > > While the NBEN does not directly take positions on environmental > issues in New Brunswick, their role is indispensable as a facilitator > for other groups that do. As Marks describes, the NBEN plays a “very > behind the scenes role,” not directly advocating but rather helping > their member groups spread awareness on environmental issues in New > Brunswick. > > The NBEN also recognizes environmental leaders and the success of > environmental campaigns through awards to individuals and groups. At > their November event, three environmental awards were presented to New > Brunswick citizens and groups to recognize their service to their > communities. > > Lois Corbett, Executive Director of the Conservation Council of New > Brunswick, was honoured with the Phoenix Award for “contributing her > extensive expertise in communications, advocacy, and policy > development to New Brunswick’s environmental movement, enabling us all > to amplify our impact on local, provincial, and national environmental > issues.” > > The citizens’ group Save Wetlands Waters and Tourism was honoured with > the Samaqan Award “for sounding the alarm about threats to coastal > ecosystems and communities along the Northumberland Strait and for > advocating for government transparency and accountability in > addressing these threats.” > > Chris Rouse, member of PEACE-NB, was honored with the Gaia Award for > “his solutions-based environmentalism that has led to improvements in > laws and regulations and, most recently, to detailed technical and > economic modeling aimed at transitioning New Brunswick to a low-carbon > economy.” > > Jennifer Adam is a UNB Law student and volunteer with RAVEN – Rural > Action and Voices for the Environment. > > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. > Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 11:49:03 -0400 > Subject: Raissa Marks, Executive Director of NBEN picked a bad day to > insult me > To: nben@nben.ca, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, "Holland, Mike (LEG)" > <mike.holland@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, > "dominic.leblanc.c1" <dominic.leblanc.c1@parl.gc.ca > <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "jeff.carr" <jeff.carr@gnb.ca>, > oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, > "Ginette.PetitpasTaylor" <Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl. > "Sherry.Wilson" <Sherry.Wilson@gnb.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore" > <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca> > Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, megan.mitton@gnb.ca > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 08:56:48 -0400 > Subject: Belliview left a voicemall and I guess it was dude named > Gauvin who called on behalf of the Riverkeepers > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. > Cc: nben@nben.ca > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 14:10:53 -0400 > Subject: Methinks Danny Boy LeBlanc, Marco Morency, the Green Meanies > and their many "Riverkeeper" buddies sure know how to jerk an old > dog's chain N'esy PasChucky Leblanc? > To: marco.morency@greenpartynb.ca, daniel.bard@petitcodiac.org, > "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "dominic.leblanc.c1" > <dominic.leblanc.c1@parl.gc.ca > <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "jeff.carr" <jeff.carr@gnb.ca>, oldmaison > <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, > "Ginette.PetitpasTaylor" <Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl. > "Sherry.Wilson" <Sherry.Wilson@gnb.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore" > <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "Alaina.Lockhart" <Alaina.Lockhart@parl.gc.ca>, > paul.n.belliveau@hotmail.com > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. > > https://www.greenparty.ca/en/ > > Founding Organizational Meeting of the Green Party of New Brunswick > Event Description > > All interested persons are invited to participate in a founding > organizational meeting of the Green Party of New Brunswick. The > gathering will occur on Saturday, May 17, 2008, with the venue being > the second floor conference room of Renaissance College, situated at > 811 Charlotte Street (located on the corner of Charlotte and Church > Streets), Fredericton, New Brunswick. > > The meeting will commence at 1:30 p.m. Elections New Brunswick > criteria for starting a new political party and an action plan will be > discussed. > > For more information, please contact: Burt Folkins, kins@nbnet.nb.ca, > or via the phone at: 506-450-8191; Marco Morency, apfee@umoncton.ca, > or via the phone at: 506-384-4697; Charles Stewart, > cstewart@nbnet.nb.ca, John McQuaid at: 506-366-2932; or Chris Alders, > chris.alders@greenparty.ca, or via the phone at: 902-678-0326. > A Canada That Works. Together. > > Join the movement > > http://petitcodiac.org/who-we- > > I called the numbers below and the Green party as well Nobody picked > up so I left voicemails.and sent emails as per my MO. One dude Paul > Belliveau > must had pocket diealed but he would not talk even when i called him > back. Much later a dude from this number 506 870 0816 called me back > I did not catch his name but he said he was 68 years old Anyway the > conversation went well until he said he supported the punk Marco > Morency,then I was all done talking. > > > > Media Contacts: > Daniel Bard > Riverkeeper and Executive Director – Petitcodiac Riverkeeper > Email: daniel.bard@petitcodiac.org or info@petitcodiac.org > Phone: 506-388-5337 > > Paul N. Belliveau > President – Petitcodiac Riverkeeper > Email: paul.n.belliveau@hotmail.com > Phone: 506-855-2637 > Cell: 506-866-2637 > > > Board > Telephone: 506-388-5337 > > > Officers > > Chairman: Ronald Babin > > Vice President: Marco Morency > > Tresurer: Pierre Landry > > Secretary : > Directors > > Wendy Keats > > André Lapointe > > Monique LeBlanc > > Mélanie Madore > > Teri McMakin > > Edmund Redfield > > > > > Our Riverkeepers > > Each Riverkeeper or Waterkeeper organization appoints an individual to > act as its main spokesperson, to work full time to defend the > interests of the river system and to ensure compliance with our > nation’s environmental laws. That person is called a “Riverkeeper”. > Since 1999, our community has been fortunate to count on a number of > outstanding individuals to serve as their “Riverkeeper”, to protect > and fight for the ecological integrity of this watershed for present > and future generations. Here they are in chronological order. > > Daniel LeBlanc (1999 to 2006) > > DanielLeBlanc Daniel was the founding Riverkeeper and Executive > Director of the organization. He was born and grew up in St-Anselme > (Dieppe), a community with strong ties to the Petitcodiac. In 1999, > Daniel became Canada’s first citizen to hold a Riverkeeper title. > During the years that followed, he led an epic battle to restore and > clean up the Petitcodiac River, to bring an end to one of Canada’s > longest-standing environmental battles. His experience is in the area > of project development, management and communications, in Canada and > abroad, covering the sectors of the environment, renewable energy, > tourism & heritage and humanitarian assistance. > Tim Van Hinte ( 2008 to 2010 ) > > Tim_at_Petitcodiac_4 Tim has an extensive background in environmental > management gained from experiences in New Brunswick, Ontario, and > British Columbia. He is a graduate from both the University of > Waterloo in Ontario and Simon Fraser University in British Columbia. A > long time advocate for environmental sustainability, Tim has a passion > for the outdoors and believes that clean water and a healthy watershed > are critical to strong communities. A native of Montreal, Tim is very > proud to have played an active role in restoring and cleaning up our > watershed for future generations. > Marco Morency (2010 to 2011) > > editor_ > Marco Morency is known in the region for his commitment to social and > environmental causes. He first became involved in the Petitcodiac > River issue in the late 90s with the environmental group Écoversité. > He continued to be committed to the river and thus became Director of > the Petitcodiac Riverkeeper in 2010. He has been very active on the > local, provincial and national scene for over 15 years, and he is a > founding member of the Sierra Youth Coalition as well as Sierra Club > Canada’s youth branch. His participation in numerous environmental > projects has earned him peer recognition. He was awarded the New > Brunswick Environmental Network’s Zephyr Award in 1999 for his work > towards making our air cleaner. > > Daniel Bard (2015 – Present) > IMG_20151012_132802 > An entrepreneur, investor and incubator of successful businesses, Mr. > Bard has a distinguished track record across several business sectors, > with deep expertise in financial and environmental business > development. Originally from Edmundston, NB, he has been living in > Moncton for the past 12 years. > > Mr. Bard’s impressive environmental work experience has focussed > mostly on the energy sector, including waste to energy, ethanol > produced with sugar beets, and EN Plus certified biofuels. He has also > been involved in international environmental initiatives, working in > Europe on a carbonation of human sludge (waste) project, a commercial > scale biofuel project using animal/vegetable by-products and an > ethanol project using Algae (photosynthesis) in a joint venture with > the United Nations. > > Mr. Bard started his new role as Petitcodiac Riverkeeper’s Executive > Director and Riverkeeper on September 30, 2015. He can be reached by > phone at 506-388-5337 or by email at daniel.bard@petitcodiac.org. > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Mitton, Megan (LEG)" <Megan.Mitton@gnb.ca> > Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 10:51:16 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: YO David Coon You do now that I crossed > paths with your buddy Marco Morency long ago long ago N'esy Pas? > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > > Thank you for your email. I am out of the office the week of July 14th > to represent the NB Legislature at the Commonwealth Parliamentary > Association Conference, and will be checking email less frequently > during this week. > > This response is to assure you that your message has been received. I > welcome and appreciate receiving comments and questions from > constituents. > > All emails are reviewed on a regular basis; however, due to the high > volume of emails my office receives, I may not be able to respond > personally to each one. > > For media requests, please call Amanda Wildeman at: 506-429-2285 or > email her at: Amanda.wildeman@gnb.ca > > Thank you once again for contacting me. > > Megan Mitton > > Member of the Legislative Assembly > > Memramcook - Tantramar > > megan.mitton@gnb.ca > > Merci pour votre courriel. Je suis hors du bureau la semaine du 14 > juillet pour représenter l'Assemblée législative du Nouveau-Brunswick > à la Conférence de l'Association parlementaire du Commonwealth, et je > consulterai moins souvent les courriels pendant cette semaine. > > Ce courriel a pour but de vous assurer que votre message a bien été > reçu. Je vous invite à me faire part de vos commentaires et de vos > questions. > > Tous les courriels sont révisés régulièrement, mais en raison du > volume élevé de courriels que mon bureau reçoit, il se peut que je ne > sois pas en mesure de répondre personnellement à chacun. > > > Pour les demandes des médias, veuillez communiquer avec Amanda > Wildeman au : 506-429-2285 ou par courriel à : Amanda.wildeman@gnb.ca > > Merci encore une fois de m'avoir contacté. > > Megan Mitton > > Députée > > Memramcook - Tantramar > > megan.mitton@gnb.ca > -- *[image: https://nben.ca/en/] <https://nben.ca/en/>* T: 506-855-4144 nben@nben.ca / renb@renb.ca - www.nben.ca / www.renb.ca 232 Rue Botsford St, 2nd floor / 2e étage, Moncton, NB E1C 4X7, Canada [image: Facebook icon] <https://www.facebook.com/ Youtube icon] <https://www.youtube.com/ ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 17:27:47 -0300 Subject: Trust that Maxime Bernier, Katie Telford and her boss know why I would love to see some Blue Coats get elected on the Rock To: tony@darrellshelleyppc.ca, danajmetcalfe@icloud.com, l.hoganppc@outlook.com, shannon.m.champion@gmail.com, lainieanna13@yahoo.com, georgia_stewart@live.com, georgiafaithppc@outlook.com, steve@hanlonrealty.ca, carolbrakeanstey@gmail.com, shanedumaresque@hotmail.com, csmall@nl.rogers.com, teamsharonvokey@gmail.com, join@avalonmatthewchapman.ca, glennetchegarycpc@gmail.com Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca> ---------- Original message ---------- From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 10:02:44 -0300 Subject: Fwd: Mr Sanderson and Mr MacDonald can trust that I after called them again I contacted many other people about Google taking down my 2nd blog once the Nova Scotia election became a matter of History To: amoschristopherlandry@gmail. anna.keenan@greenparty.ca, alex.clark@greenparty.ca, waynebiggar@royallepage.ca, info@barrybalsom.ca, doug@dougcurrie.ca, galacticbutterfly@hotmail.ca, scott.mcphee@protonmail.com Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, lawrencemacaulay2021@gmail.com Robert.Morrissey@parl.gc.ca, titann@rogers.com ---------- Original message ---------- From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 01:05:56 +0000 Subject: RE: Mr Sanderson and Mr MacDonald can trust that I after called them again I contacted many other people about Google taking down my 2nd blog once the Nova Scotia election became a matter of History To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Hello, Thank you for taking the time to write. Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed at the earliest opportunity. If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for review and consideration. Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire. En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les meilleurs délais. Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel pour examen et considération. If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at (506) 453-2144 or by email media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144. Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau- Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144 Email/Courriel: premier@gnb.ca/premier. ---------- Original message ---------- From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 14:42:42 -0300 Subject: Mr Sanderson and Mr MacDonald can trust that I after called them again I contacted many other people about Google taking down my 2nd blog once the Nova Scotia election became a matter of History To: judyburke@assembly.pe.ca, bdweldon@assembly.pe.ca, jhperrymla@assembly.pe.ca, sjgallantMLA@assembly.pe.ca, gamcneillyMLA@assembly.pe.ca, rlhendersonMLA@assembly.pe.ca, assembly@assembly.pe.ca, jody@jodysanderson.ca, hmacdonald1346@gmail.com, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, office@liberal.ns.ca, "Kevin.leahy" <Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Michael.Gorman" <Michael.Gorman@cbc.ca>, electivandrouin@gmail.com, trainorgreenpartyns@gmail.com, anthony.edmonds@greenpartyns. doug@doug4kingsnorth.ca, krista.grear@greenpartyns.ca, JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca, Naomi.Shelton@novascotia.ca, gary.burrill@nsndp.ca, larry.duchesne@nsndp.ca, lauren.skabar@nsndp.ca, feedback@nsndp.ca, campaign.manager@greenpartyns. provincial.admin@greenpartyns. Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, "Ian.Shugart" <Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca> https://www.assembly.pe.ca/ The Conflict of Interest Commissioner 197 Richmond Street (Church Street entrance) Charlottetown PO Box 2000 Charlottetown, PE C1A 7K7 Phone: 902-368-5970 Fax: 902-368-5175 Email: judyburke@assembly.pe.ca Judy Burke, Q.C., was appointed Conflict of Interest Commissioner on January 1, 2020, following a recent move from Calgary where she was a founding partner in a law firm specializing in litigation and insolvency law. Judy was active in the Alberta legal community, serving on the Practice Review Committee and teaching in legal education programs. She served on the board of Big Brothers Big Sisters Calgary, including a term as board chair, and provided legal advice to underserved women at a women's centre. While not originally from the Island, Judy's husband was raised in eastern PEI and before relocating they were frequent visitors for more than 25 years. Judy had a successful nursing career prior to studying law and held a number of leadership positions in that profession. She is currently a member of the Law Society of PEI and volunteers her time as a member of the Ethics Committee. https://www.assembly.pe.ca/ Brian Weldon, Director of Security & Sergeant-at-Arms Legislative Assembly Office of the Clerk 165 Richmond Street Charlottetown, PE C1A 1J1 Phone: 902-368-5976 Fax: 902-368-5175 Email: bdweldon@assembly.pe.ca Changes in Assembly Personnel Sergeant-at-Arms and Director of Security Al McDonald retired on September 29, 2017, after a total of 22 years working in a security capacity at the Legislative Assembly, and 10 years as Sergeant-at-Arms and Director of Security. Clerk Assistant and Clerk of Committees Marian Johnston retired from the service of the House effective December 31, 2017, after 17 years at the Assembly. Most recently Ms. Johnston had served as Acting Chief Electoral Officer for Elections PEI. Many members rose in the House to express their appreciation for the expertise and dedication shown by Mr. McDonald and Ms. Johnston throughout the years. On November 14, 2017, the Assembly appointed Brian Weldon as Sergeant-at-Arms. Mr. Weldon had previously served as Assistant Sergeant-at-Arms, and with his promotion the Assembly appointed Amy Unwin to the Assistant role. On the same day, the Assembly appointed Emily Doiron and Ryan Reddin as Clerk Assistant – Journals, Committees and House Operations; and Clerk Assistant – Research and Committees, respectively. Security Share This : Phone: 902-368-5970 Fax: 902-368-5175 Email: assembly@assembly.pe.ca The public is always welcome to watch the debates when the legislature is sitting, or visit the chamber when the House is not in session. Legislative buildings are staffed with security officers who will check you in when you arrive. If the legislature is in session, visitors enter the building through the lower level and are screened through security and given a pass before heading upstairs to the chamber. Bags may be searched and large backpacks may be held at the security desk while you watch the debates. Cameras and recording devices are not allowed in the public gallery in the chamber. If the legislature is not sitting, visitors enter the building through the main doors and check in at the security desk before heading to the chamber. Ceremonial duties The Director of Security for the Legislative Assembly also holds the position of Sergeant-At-Arms, which has a long history in our parliamentary tradition. It began in the early years of the British Parliament, when mace-bearing members of the Royal bodyguard were assigned to attend the Speaker at sittings of the House of Commons in London. The Sergeant-At-Arms still carries a mace into the Assembly today, leading the Speaker's procession into the chamber at the start of every sitting day, but today's Mace is a ceremonial symbol rather than a weapon. Without the Mace present in the chamber, the House could not exercise its rights, claim its privilege, or perform its parliamentary functions. Besides bearing the Mace during the daily procession into the House, the Sergeant-At-Arms is responsible for the security of the Speaker, Members, and the Legislative Assembly buildings. This carries the responsibility of implementing and enforcing the security policies of the Legislative Assembly to provide a safe and secure environment for MLAs and Assembly staff to perform their work duties. During a sitting, the Sergeant-At-Arms has the assistance of an eight-member Legislative Assembly Security Force in the delivery of security services to the Legislative Assembly, located in the Hon. George Coles Building, J. Angus MacLean Building, and at 197 Richmond Street. https://davidraymondamos3. Friday, 18 September 2015 David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15 Court File No. T-1557-15 FEDERAL COURT BETWEEN: DAVID RAYMOND AMOS Plaintiff and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Defendant STATEMENT OF CLAIM The Parties 1. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN (Crown) is Elizabeth II, the Queen of England, the Protector of the Faith of the Church of England, the longest reigning monarch of the United Kingdom and one of the wealthiest persons in the world. Canada pays homage to the Queen because she remained the Head of State and the Chief Executive Officer of Canada after the Canada Act 1982 (U.K.) 1982, c. 11 came into force on April 17, 1982. The standing of the Queen in Canada was explained within the 2002 Annual Report FORM 18-K filed by Canada with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). It states as follows: “The executive power of the federal Government is vested in the Queen, represented by the Governor General, whose powers are exercised on the advice of the federal Cabinet, which is responsible to the House of Commons. The legislative branch at the federal level, Parliament, consists of the Crown, the Senate and the House of Commons.” “The executive power in each province is vested in the Lieutenant Governor, appointed by the Governor General on the advice of the federal Cabinet. The Lieutenant Governor’s powers are exercised on the advice of the provincial cabinet, which is responsible to the legislative assembly. Each provincial legislature is composed of a Lieutenant Governor and a legislative assembly made up of members elected for a period of five years.” 2. Her Majesty the Queen is the named defendant pursuant to sections 23(1) and 36 of the Crown Liability and Proceedings Act. Some of the state actors whose duties and actions are at issue in this action are the Prime Minister, Premiers, Governor General, Lieutenant Governors, members of the Canadian Forces (CF), and Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), federal and provincial Ministers of Public Safety, Ministers of Justice, Ministers of Finance, Speakers, Clerks, Sergeants-at-Arms and any other person acting as Aide-de-Camp providing security within and around the House of Commons, the legislative assemblies or acting as security for other federal, provincial and municipal properties. 3. Her Majesty the Queen’s servants the RCMP whose mandate is to serve and protect Canadian citizens and assist in the security of parliamentary properties and the protection of public officials should not deny a correspondence from a former Deputy Prime Minister who was appointed to be Canada’s first Minister of Public Safety in order to oversee the RCMP and their cohorts. The letter that helped to raise the ire of a fellow Canadian citizen who had never voted in his life to run for public office four times thus far is quoted as follows: “Mr. David R. Amos Jan 3rd, 2004 153Alvin Avenue Milton, MA U.S.A. 02186 Dear Mr. Amos Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to my predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding your safety. I apologize for the delay in responding. If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only suggest that you contact the police of local jurisdiction. In addition, any evidence of criminal activity should be brought to their attention since the police are in the best position to evaluate the information and take action as deemed appropriate. I trust that this information is satisfactory. Yours sincerely A. Anne McLellan” 4. DAVID RAYMOND AMOS (Plaintiff), a Canadian Citizen and the first Chief of the Amos Clan, was born in Sackville, New Brunswick (NB) on July 17th, 1952. 5. The Plaintiff claims standing in this action as a citizen whose human rights and democratic interests are to be protected by due performance of the obligations of Canada’s public officials who are either elected or appointed and all servants of the Crown whose mandate is to secure the public safety, protect public interests and to uphold and enforce the rule of law. The Crown affirms his right to seek relief for offences to his rights under section 24(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charter). Paragraphs 6 to 13 explain the delay in bringing this action before Federal Court and paragraphs 25 to 88 explain this matter. 6. The Plaintiff states that pursuant to the democratic rights found in Section 3 of the Charter he was a candidate in the elections of the membership of the 38th and 39th Parliaments in the House of Commons and a candidate in the elections of the memberships of the legislative assemblies in Nova Scotia (NS) and NB in 2006. 7. The Plaintiff states that if he is successful in finding a Chartered Accountant to audit his records as per the rules of Elections Canada, he will attempt to become a candidate in the election of the membership of the 42nd Parliament. 8. The Plaintiff states that beginning in January of 2002, he made many members of the RCMP and many members of the corporate media including employees of a Crown Corporation, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) well aware of the reason why he planned to return to Canada and become a candidate in the next federal election. In May of 2004, all members seated in the 37th Parliament before the writ was dropped for the election of the 38th Parliament and several members of the legislative assemblies of NB and Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) knew the reason is the ongoing rampant public corruption. Evidence of the Plaintiff’s concerns can be found within his documents that the Office of the Governor General acknowledged were in its possession ten years ago before the Speech from the Throne in 2004. The Governor General’s letter is as follows: “September 11th, 2004 Dear Mr. Amos, On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne Clarkson, I acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and CD regarding corruption, one received from you directly, and the other forwarded to us by the Office of the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick. I regret to inform you that the Governor General cannot intervene in matters that are the responsibility of elected officials and courts of Justice of Canada. You already contacted the various provincial authorities regarding your concerns, and these were the appropriate steps to take. Yours sincerely. Renee Blanchet Office of the Secretary to the Governor General” 9. The Plaintiff states that the documents contain proof that the Crown by way of the RCMP and the Minister of Public Safety/Deputy Prime Minister knew that he was the whistleblower offering his assistance to Maher Arar and his lawyers in the USA. The Governor General acknowledged his concerns about the subject of this complaint and affirmed that the proper provincial authorities were contacted but ignored the Plaintiff’s faxes and email to the RCMP and the Solicitor General in November of 2003 and his tracked US Mail to the Solicitor General and the Commissioner of the RCMP by way of the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) in December of 2003 and the response he received from the Minister of Public Safety/Deputy Prime Minister in early 2004. One document was irrefutable proof that there was no need whatsoever to create a Commission of Inquiry into Maher Arar concerns at about the same point in time. That document is a letter from the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Office Inspector General (OIG complaint no. C04-01448) admitting contact with his office on November 21, 2003 within days of the Plaintiff talking to the office of Canada’s Solicitor General while he met with the US Attorney General and one day after the former Attorney General of New York (NY) and the former General Counsel of the SEC testified at a public hearing before the US Senate Banking Committee about investigations of the mutual fund industry. 10. The Plaintiff states that another document that the Plaintiff received during the election of the 39th Parliament further supported the fact he was a whistleblower about financial crimes. In December of 2006 a member of the RCMP was ethical enough to admit that he understood the Plaintiff’s concerns and forwarded his response to the acting Commissioner of the RCMP and others including a NB Cabinet Minister Michael B. Murphy QC. The Crown is well aware that any member sitting in the last days of the 37th Parliament through to the end of the 41st Parliament could have stood in the House of Commons and asked the Speaker if the Crown was aware of the Plaintiff’s actions. All parliamentarians should have wondered why his concerns and that of Mr. Arar’s were not heard by a committee within the House of Commons in early 2004. Instead, the Crown created an expensive Commission to delay the Arar matter while he sued the governments of Canada and the USA and his wife ran in the election of the 38th Parliament. In 2007, Arar received a $10-million settlement from the Crown and the Prime Minister gave him an official apology yet the US government has never admitted fault. A month after the writ was dropped for the election of the 42nd Parliament and CBC is reporting Syrian concerns constantly, Mr. Arar’s lawyer announced that the RCMP will attempt to extradite a Syrian intelligence officer because it had laid a charge in absentia and a Canada-wide warrant and Interpol notice were issued. The Plaintiff considers such news to be politicking practiced by the Minister of Public Safety. He noticed the usually outspoken Mr. Arar made no comment but his politically active wife had lots to say on CBC. Meanwhile, the RCMP continues to bar a fellow citizen from parliamentary properties because he exercised the same democratic rights after he had offered his support to Arar by way of his American lawyers. The aforementioned letter about financial crimes was from the Inspector General for Tax Administration in the US Department of the Treasury. Mr Arar’s lawyers, the RCMP, the Canadian Revenue Agency and the US Internal Revenue Service still refuse to even admit TIGTA complaint no. 071-0512-0055-C exists. However, the Commissioner of Federal Court, the Queen’s Privy Council Office and other agencies were made well aware of it before the Speech from the Throne in 2006. 11. The Plaintiff states that from June 24, 2004 until the day he signed this complaint he has diligently tried to resolve the breach of his rights under the Charter that are the subject of this complaint with any public official in Canada whom he believed had the mandate or the ability to request that the Crown investigate and correct the malicious actions and inactions of the RCMP, Sergeants-at-Arms and Aides-de-Camp in all jurisdictions. Until June 16, 2006 the Plaintiff did not have irrefutable proof to support this complaint. Time did not permit him to address it immediately in Federal Court in 2006 because his slate was full. For instance on June 16, 2006 while dealing with deeply troubling private family matters, he was running against the Attorney General for his seat in the NS provincial election while arguing members of the RCMP about strange calls he got from someone in Ottawa who claimed the Department of Public Safety as her client, dealing with many liberal party members who were about to witness in Moncton NB the first debate of all those who wished to become their new leader, assisting a farmer in his attempt to get some authority to properly investigate the demise of his cattle and discussing with members of the Saint John NB City Council the actions of a sergeant in the Saint John Police Force who was calling friends of the Plaintiff and claiming that he was drug dealing member of a bike gang that they should stay away from while he was preparing to intervene in pipeline matter that was about to heard by the National Energy Board in Saint John . 12. The Plaintiff states that in April of 2007 he wrote a complaint about this matter and returned to the Capital District of NB in order to file it and argue the Crown before the Federal Court if it did not wish to settle. A clerk of this court informed him that his complaint was not composed correctly, so he began to rewrite this complaint. However, as soon as it was known what the Plaintiff was about to file he was subject to further police harassment and his family began to suffer from constant slander, sexual harassment and death threats on the Internet and on the telephone that continues to this very day while the RCMP, the FBI and many other law enforcement authorities continue to ignored the obvious evidence of cybercrime practiced against many people including his minor children. 13. The Plaintiff states that the Crown’s only response has been further harassment by the RCMP including false arrest and imprisonment and theft of his property by the Fredericton Police Force supported by other law enforcement authorities in Canada and the USA. The Governor General has had the Plaintiff’s documents for over ten years to study. The Crown now has one of the complaints that the RCMP has been delaying since 2003. It is as follows: The Complaint 14. The Plaintiff states that on June 24, 2004 during the election of the membership of the 38th Parliament the Crown breached his right to peaceful assembly and association under Section 2(c) and (d) of the Charter. The Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative Assembly of NB (a former member of the RCMP) supported by the Fredericton Police Force (FPF), the Corps of Commissionaires (COC) and at least one RCMP officer acting as Aide-de-Camp to the NB Lieutenant Governor barred the Plaintiff under threat of arrest from the legislative properties in NB. 15. The Plaintiff states that whereas the Crown refused to put anything in writing to either confirm or deny that he was in fact barred from the legislative properties in NB, he returned to the public property whenever he deemed it necessary to do so as he ran for public office three more times. For example, when the Plaintiff was a candidate in the election of the 39th Parliament for the riding of Fredericton, he was asked to come into the legislative building of NB to record a live interview for an Atlantic Television (ATV) news cast shortly before polling day. On that occasion, the Sergeant-at-Arms and his Aides-de-Camp did not attempt to bar the Plaintiff from access to legislative property quite possibly because they did not wish their actions to be recorded by ATV. However, the Crown made matters worse in short order. CBC barred the Plaintiff from an all-candidates’ debate on the University of New Brunswick (UNB) campus and on polling day two District Returning Officers on the UNB campus after viewing identification threatened to have the Plaintiff arrested stating that they did not believe he was on the ballot. 16. The Plaintiff states that the NB Sergeant-at-Arms continued with his threat of arrest after the election 39th Parliament. In response, the Plaintiff challenged the Sergeant-at-Arms to either put his threat in writing or arrest him so he could at least argue the Crown about the offences against his rights under the Charter. https://www.assembly.pe.ca/ Heath MacDonald Share This : Photo of Heath MacDonald Cornwall - Meadowbank Liberal Heath MacDonald was first elected to the provincial legislature on May 4, 2015, representing District 16, Cornwall – Meadowbank, and was re-elected by that district on April 23, 2019. He was subsequently appointed Minister of Economic Development and Tourism on May 19, 2015, and was later sworn in as Minister of Finance on January 10, 2018, a position he held until 2019. He currently serves as Third Party House Leader in the legislature and is the critic on education, finance, economic growth, tourism, culture, mental health and pharmacare. Prior to his election as a Member of the Legislative Assembly, Mr. MacDonald was the Executive Director of Quality Tourism Services, Atlantic Canada Manager of Access Advisor, and President and Co-Founder of BamText Information Technology and Consulting. Mr. MacDonald has over 20 years’ experience in the private sector with a focus on the tourism industry. Mr. MacDonald has been an active volunteer for many years, with ties to numerous sports and community organizations. Mr. MacDonald has earned recognition from various organizations for his efforts to improve accessibility for people with disabilities, including the Access Award from the PEI Council of People with Disabilities, and the City of Charlottetown Accessibility Award. Mr. MacDonald was a Chair Leader as part of the Canadian Paraplegic Association's annual awareness campaign. Mr. MacDonald lives in Cornwall with his wife Elizabeth and they have two children, Jacklyn and Isaac. Mr. MacDonald resigned as a Member of the Legislative Assembly on August 18, 2021. Contact information: Phone: 902-368-4330 Email: hmacdonaldMLA@assembly.pe.ca https://www.linkedin.com/in/ Jody Sanderson Conservative Candidate for Malpeque Canada Contact info Conservative Party of Canada University of New Brunswick 500+ connections About Conservative Party of Canada Candidate for Malpeque. Husband, Father, Innovative Senior Executive, Avid Triathlete, Proud Islander. I am a high performing, results-focused, and proactive business executive. I have cultivated over 23 years of diverse, senior-level management experience working with HSBC in Asia, North America and most recently as the Regional Head of the Corporate and Investment Bank for the largest foreign banking platform in the Middle East. I am widely acknowledged as a trusted relationship developer which is further reinforced with a commitment to continuous improvement, strategic initiatives, revenue delivery, and knowledge sharing. I have managed over $200 Billion of capital markets transactions in my career with HSBC. Having returned home to Prince Edward Island in 2019 to live and raise my young family, I continue to seek new and challenging opportunities where I can leverage my past experience and skill set. I am happily married to my wife Larissa, and we are the proud parents to Chase and Scarlett, our eight year old twins. … Activity 1,598 followers No alternative text description for this image This week I sat down with Premier Dennis King to discuss a variety of topics including health care, the environment, affordable housing, and our economy. Improving early access to health care professionals such as paramedics, nurses, nurse practitioners, and doctors is critical to the overall health of Islanders. We know that early access is key to better outcomes for patients. In order to improve access, we need a federal government that is willing to make the necessary investments in our health care system across the country. Now more than ever, we need a collaborative approach between the federal and provincial governments on healthcare, the environment, and the economy to deliver greater prosperity for Islanders. #SecureTheFuture #JodyForMalpeque Jody shared this 54 Reactions 3 Comments a group of people posing for a picture My fellow Conservative Candidates and I hosted our Conservative Party of Canada leader Erin O'Toole on Prince Edward Island this weekend. We held a reception at Salt & Sol Restaurant and Lounge and made stops at Red Shores Racetrack & Casino at Charlottetown Driving Park, Joey's Deep Sea Fishing, and finished the tour with a PEI Lobster Roll at Chez Yvonne's Restaurant. I also had the opportunity to spend some one-on-one time with our leader Saturday morning as part of an early morning run around Charlottetown. He is genuine, hard-working, and is committed to moving our Atlantic Canadian economy forward. I believe Erin is the right person to get this country back on track. I will ensure that the needs of our residents, farming, fishing, and tourism industries are a top priority in the CPC’s Economic Recovery Plan. An election is just around the corner. I will work hard to secure the future of Malpeque, and I am asking for your support as your next MP for Malpeque. #JodyForMalpeque #SecureTheFuture Jody shared this 70 Reactions 2 Comments View Jason Lang’s profile Congratulations Jason. Many great memories working with you in Canada and the Middle East. All the best in the new role. Jody commented a close up of text over a background picture of a building Congrats Lena. Good to see things going well for you. Jody commented See all activity See all activity Experience Conservative Party of Canada Candidate for Malpeque Company Name Conservative Party of Canada Dates Employed Feb 2021 – Present Employment Duration 7 mos Location Malpeque, Prince Edward Island Conservative Party of Canada candidate for the electoral riding of Malpeque ahead of the next federal election. Won the Malpeque Federal Conservative Nomination on February 20, 2021. Sanderson to represent Conservatives in Malpeque | CBC Sanderson to represent Conservatives in Malpeque | CBC Sanderson Capital Inc. Co-Founder & CEO Company Name Sanderson Capital Inc. Full-time Dates Employed May 2019 – Present Employment Duration 2 yrs 4 mos Location Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada Co-Founder & CEO of Sanderson Capital Inc focused on propriety and co-investment opportunities. HSBC Company Name HSBC Total Duration 18 yrs 1 mo Title Managing Director, Co-Head of Global Banking, GCC Dates Employed Aug 2017 – May 2019 Employment Duration 1 yr 10 mos Location Qatar Senior Executive for the Corporate and Investment Banking business in GCC countries including Qatar, UAE, Oman, Bahrain and Kuwait. Responsible for co-leading 200+ employees, I provided oversight for a credit exposure book of more than USD $100 billion and revenues of over USD $750 million. Role also included acting as the Chief Executive Officer for the HSBC Qatar operation on a regular basis. … Title Managing Director, Head of Global Banking, GCC (ex-UAE) Dates Employed Feb 2015 – Jul 2017 Employment Duration 2 yrs 6 mos Location Qatar As a key member of the executive leadership team, responsible for directing strategy, change management, communication, annual planning, and strategic vision initiatives for HSBC’s Global Investment Banking in GCC countries, including Qatar, Oman, Bahrain and Kuwait. Title Managing Director, Head of Global Banking, Qatar Dates Employed Jun 2009 – Feb 2015 Employment Duration 5 yrs 9 mos Location Qatar As Head of Global Banking, responsible for maintaining and enhancing existing revenue streams and developing new business by identifying and selling innovative solutions to a def... [Message clipped] View entire message | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No comments:
Post a Comment