Friday, 20 October 2023

Meet the man fighting city hall to rename natural gas and What's this about a meat tax?

 
 

Meet the man fighting city hall to rename natural gas

Also: A meat tax?

Our planet is changing. So is our journalism. This weekly newsletter is part of a CBC News initiative entitled "Our Changing Planet" to show and explain the effects of climate change. Keep up with the latest news on our Climate and Environment page.

Sign up here to get this newsletter in your inbox every Thursday.


This week:

  • Meet the man fighting city hall to rename natural gas
  • What's this about a meat tax?
  • The Caribbean looks to Trudeau to put climate change funding on world's agenda

Meet the man fighting city hall to rename natural gas

A man in a cap stands near a gas meter. B.C.-based Eddie Dearden is engaged in a campaign to get municipalities to stop using the phrase natural gas. (Submitted by Eddie Dearden)
 
 

What On Earth 18:06
 One man’s mission to change how you think about natural gas

Eddie Dearden is a man on a semantic mission. 

A former chemical engineer in the coal industry, Dearden has been writing letters and showing up at council meetings this year, urging B.C. municipalities to change the term natural gas to "fossil gas" in official documents. 

Why? Because he believes it would make clear to the public the need to phase the fuel out in the face of climate change.

"The term natural gas does not explicitly convey the fossil origins of such gas, leading to potential misunderstandings and hampering policy-making," he told What On Earth.

Learning about climate change a decade ago spurred Dearden to switch careers from the fossil fuel industry and into sustainable home design. The heat dome that hit western North America in June 2021 inspired him to do even more.

"It was a really terrifying night for me, the hottest night," he said, describing the worry he felt over the health and safety of his then one-year-old daughter. "It was 30 C in our house in the middle of the night."

Feeling the need to act, Dearden began advising clients not to use natural gas in the homes he was designing for them. 

"They would really resist. They just started saying the most amazing things back to me, like, 'But it's natural,' or 'It's green, it's good,'" he said. "[These were] smart, educated people, and their words were showing that they did not know what natural gas is."

Dearden said when he started using the term "fossil gas," however, many more clients agreed to keep it out of their homes. 

Primarily composed of methane, natural gas has major climate implications. It's a more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide, with greater ability to trap heat in the Earth's atmosphere.  

Because it's cleaner to burn than coal, the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers says natural gas can play an important role in reducing GHG emissions. A number of studies have cast doubt on the idea, including a recent one in the journal Environmental Research Letters, which showed that even small methane leaks during drilling, processing or transportation can put natural gas on par with coal when it comes to carbon emissions intensity.

FortisBC, a B.C. utility that provides natural gas as well as electricity, declined an interview request, but in an email to CBC said it is "working to increase the supply of low-carbon and renewable energy, like Renewable Natural Gas derived from organic sources."

When it comes to the general public, research has shown that terminology affects perceptions of natural gas. Examples both in Canada and around the world suggest "fossil gas" is catching on. 

Metro Vancouver, a federation of municipalities in southwest B.C, now uses "fossil gas" in some official documents. In an email to CBC, the organization said  "ensuring common understanding of basic terms is fundamental to climate literacy and building support for climate action." 

After some back-and-forth discussion, the New York Climate Action Council opted to use "fossil natural gas" in a recent climate plan. Last December, the Language Council of Sweden, a government department that gives recommendations about the best use of Swedish words, recommended "fossil gas" should be the primary term used to describe natural gas.  

Linnea Hanell, a language expert with the Swedish council, acknowledged that action is vital to finding solutions to climate change, but said semantics can also play a role. 

"Useful terminology can make a difference to these vital conversations that we need to have," she said.

Whistler municipal council has so far refused Dearden's request. Mayor Jack Crompton said in a recent public meeting that council decided its efforts were better spent on action — such as improving public transit — than semantics. Crompton also told CBC via email that the climate-related words council uses are guided by official provincial and federal documents. 

In an emailed statement, Natural Resources Canada said natural gas is a generally accepted term used by industry, governments and academia. 

"As for language shifting from this term to others, we are constantly monitoring how discussions evolve," the statement continued, adding that "today's use of gas is getting increasingly clean as companies work towards minimizing and abating emissions associated with its production, transportation and usage." 

Dearden hasn't been able to convince any B.C. municipalities to change their wording, although North Vancouver said via email that it is considering his suggestion. 

Undaunted, he's taking his campaign to another level, with a recent letter to B.C.'s environment and climate change minister, which included a draft of a potential private members' bill called the "Fossil Gas Clarification Act, 2023."

Ultimately, he said, clear language would help people make climate-friendly decisions. 

"If people can just easily see what a fossil carbon product is, at least they can make a choice," he said. "We just need to get people informed of the fossils in their life."

Rachel Sanders


Old issues of What on Earth? are here. The CBC News climate page is here. 

Check out our radio show and podcast. This week: meet the oil man leading the world's biggest climate talks. Despite criticism, Sultan Ahmed Al Jaber says he's the man for the job, as COP28 begins in Dubai next month. What On Earth airs on Sundays at 11 a.m. ET, 11:30 a.m. in Newfoundland and Labrador. Subscribe on your favourite podcast app or hear it on demand at CBC Listen.

Watch the CBC video series Planet Wonder featuring our colleague Johanna Wagstaffe here.


Reader feedback

Philip Lucas on Lauren Pelley's story on tree diseases:

"The article was very interesting, though there was no reference or information on the reasons why some trees have a higher profile than others, or why diseases seem to be more common and kill large trees…. 

"Thanks for posting the article, I hope many more will come with in-depth research and information on innovation in the use of this natural resource to benefit the planet."

Write us at whatonearth@cbc.ca

Have a compelling personal story about climate change you want to share with CBC News? Pitch a First Person column here.


The Big Picture: What's this about a meat tax?

It's a burger. (Andrew Burton/Getty Images)

Earlier this month, Claire Coutinho, Britain's energy security and net zero secretary, went viral after suggesting in a speech at the Conservative Party conference that the opposition Labour Party was planning to introduce a "meat tax." When Sky News journalist Sophy Ridge pressed her (repeatedly) to provide evidence that Labour had in fact broached such a policy, Coutinho prevaricated and vaguely suggested Labour's broader climate strategy would be a financial burden on working-class families.  

Environmentalists have long said that meat production — particularly beef — is a massive contributor to global emissions. But as Coutinho demonstrated, seeding the idea that your political opponents want to deter meat-eating is yet another front in the culture war. Back in 2019, U.S. President Donald Trump, along with one of his advisers, attacked Rep. Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez, co-author of the Green New Deal proposal, for wanting to abolish hamburgers. What AOC actually said, in a radio interview, was "we've got to address factory farming. Maybe we shouldn't be eating a hamburger for breakfast, lunch and dinner."

No one in the U.K. is calling for a meat tax — but if cutting emissions is a legitimate goal, maybe someone should, suggests this essay in The Conversation. The piece states that "price interventions on meat and other emissions-intensive foods are probably needed to meet environmental targets in the food sector." Addressing the notion that a meat tax would put the working class at a disadvantage, the piece argues that by and large, affluent households spend more on meat than the rest of the population and could afford to pay a bit more. As well, if a meat tax was broadly introduced, the government could channel the revenues "back to consumers in monthly or annual payments directly to their bank accounts," sort of like Canada's carbon tax.

Hot and bothered: Provocative ideas from around the web

  • In 1905, a Canadian named George Cove invented household solar panels and a backup battery that gained widespread attention and appeared poised to make clean energy widely available. Then in 1909, Cove was kidnapped, and business fizzled. University of Oxford researcher Sugandha Srivastav shares his story in The Conversation and asks if it was really inevitable that fossil fuels would dominate the 20th century.

  • Many communities have opposed solar panels, worrying they'll generate toxic waste. Scientists from the U.S. National Renewable Energy Laboratory explain why those worries are "unfounded" and hope showing that will speed up the clean energy transition.

The Caribbean looks to Trudeau to put climate change funding on world's agenda

Dominica Prime Minister Roosevelt Skerrit, left to right, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and CARICOM Secretary General Carla Barnett arrive at the family photo at the Canada-CARICOM summit in Ottawa on Wednesday, Oct.18, 2023. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick From left to right, Dominica Prime Minister Roosevelt Skerrit, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and CARICOM Secretary General Carla Barnett arrive to took a group photo at the Canada-CARICOM summit in Ottawa on Oct. 18, 2023. (THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick)

Caribbean leaders meeting with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau this week are hoping Canada will push their concerns — such as the profound threat they face from climate change — higher on the international agenda.

Trudeau is taking a break from domestic politics and his engagement on the Israeli-Hamas conflict to co-chair a three-day meeting with leaders of the Caribbean economic and political bloc CARICOM.

St. Lucia's Prime Minister Philip Pierre, speaking to reporters last Friday, outlined the issues that would be on the agenda as Ottawa hosted the Canada-CARICOM summit through to Thursday.

Pierre, CARICOM's lead on climate change, said the world is not on track to meet the goals of the 2016 Paris Agreement. That agreement commits countries to working toward limiting warming to 1.5 C above pre-industrial levels.

The planet is inching closer to surpassing that target; the United Nations says the world already has warmed by at least 1.1 C.

According to the UN, global climate pledges have placed the world on track for a temperature rise of between 2.4 C and 2.6 C by 2100.

Pierre said he hopes one outcome of the summit is a message to the world, through Canada, that the region needs help to cope with the effects of climate change — more frequent and intense tropical storms, rising sea levels and hotter days.

The region, he said, needs Canada's assistance to secure better financing terms from private lenders and multilateral development banks to help it adapt to climate change.

"So hopefully, our issues can be promoted by Canada to the international world," Pierre said.

Trudeau's office said in a news release this week's summit would be an opportunity for countries to advance shared priorities.

"The leaders will also work to fight climate change and address its impacts in the Caribbean, including by exploring ways to improve access to financing for Small Island Developing States in the Caribbean," the statement reads.

This is Trudeau's second meeting with CARICOM heads of government since his trip to the Bahamas in February. As it did then, the worsening security, political and humanitarian crisis in Haiti was expected to feature in the discussions in Ottawa this week.

Canada's former Jamaican high commissioner Robert Ready said this week's summit is about strengthening the ties between this country and the region through an overdue meeting. Canada has been focused on Asia, Europe and Latin America of late, but within the last three years Ottawa has pushed to re-engage with CARICOM, which represents a region that is home to 16 million people.

"While there are a lot of Canadians who travel south as tourists, I think both sides have tended in the past to take each other for granted," said Ready, who sits on the board of the Canada Caribbean Institute.

David Thurton


 
 
 
383 Comments

 
 
David R. Amos
I would wager that Dearden has no clue who dreamed up the nonsensical term "fossil fuel" in the first place 
 
 
 
Mark Shore 
The historical reason that "natural gas" was called that was to distinguish it from "coal gas" or "water gas" generated by passing hot steam over heated coal or coke under reducing conditions, generating a flammable mix of methane, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen. Methane was less hazardous than coal gas and won out, particularly as oil and gas industry ramped up in scale in the early 1900s.

Fossil gas or even just methane are also perfectly accurate terms.

 
Gerry Ford
Reply to Mark Shore 
Though there is no gas in a fossil.  
 
 
BINGO
 
 
 
 
Tom Revin 
Hm.. Interesting naming. He's not wrong. 
 
 
David R. Amos 
Reply to Tom Revin 
I disagree 
 
 
Lorne Browne 
Reply to David R. Amos 
Likewise - that guy is a wack oh.  
 
 
 
 
Dan Houle 
Think of all the poor people who won't be able to have their pudding!
 
 
Jim O Neill 
Reply to Dan Houle
"If they don't eat their meat!"  
 
 
David R. Amos 
Reply to Jim O Neill
What about blood pudding?
 
 
 
 
 
Dale McConnell
The guy has a point. It really isn’t natural gas. 
 
 
Hank Henderson  
Content Deactivated
Reply to Dale McConnell 
 
 
David R. Amos 
Reply to Dale McConnell 
If it isn't natural then what is it?  
 
 
Lorne Browne 
Reply to Hank Henderson
Nonsense.  
 
 
David R. Amos 
Reply to Lorne Browne
My dog and I have been known to produce our fair share of natural gas  
 
 
George Biggs 
Reply to Dale McConnell 
The guy has no point, but an axe to grind.
 
 
David R. Amos 
Reply to George Biggs 
I concur 


Martin Damus 
Reply to George Biggs 
He explained his point. 
 
 
George Biggs 
Reply to Martin Damus
No, he has an axe to grind. He is just struggling to justify his little tirade.  
 
 
Martin Damus 
Reply to George Biggs 
I think otherwise. Given that he's talked to people who think the "natural" in natural gas means it's harmless, he seems to have a good point.
 
 
George Biggs 
Reply to Martin Damus
Of course you do, and it is okay to be wrong. He has an axe to grind and now has been given his 15 minutes by The Mother Corp.
 
 
Martin Damus 
Reply to George Biggs 
Conspiracy theories are fun, but they really don't help in the grand scheme of things.
 
 
George Biggs 
Reply to Martin Damus
It is hardly a conspiracy theory. You can't deny this 70% taxpayer funded "new agency" carries more of the agenda than any other media in Canada, with the exception of the Narwhal or maybe The Tyee..
 
 
David R. Amos 
Reply to Martin Damus
Check my work
 
 
Martin Damus 
Reply to George Biggs 
Yes I can. It's only the people so far biased to the right side of the spectrum that view it as biased, but that's because of their own bias. Since 70% of Canadians vote to centre or left thereof, having stories like these just responds to what most Canadians think.
 
 
Martin Damus 
Reply to David R. Amos
Scatological humour? Wow. Back to the schoolyard with you. 
 
 
David R. Amos 
Reply to Martin Damus
You should have took my advice
 
 
George Biggs 
Reply to Martin Damus 
Keep telling yourself that. 
 
 
 
 
 
Robert McGraw
Content Deactivated



George Biggs
Reply to Robert McGraw
Well, to be fair; they provoked....


Robert McGraw
Reply to George Biggs
No. That was the British 80 years ago. The past 16 years have been criminal. The actions of the past week by an apparently “legitimate” government have been reprehensible.
 
 
George Biggs
Reply to Robert McGraw
Over 100 years ago if you wanna be precise. You can defend the indefensible all you want, but the aggressors are now reaping what they sowed. And rightfully so.


David Amos
Reply to Robert McGraw
IMHO The criminal activity involving "fossil fuels" began with the invention of the steam engine

 
Robert McGraw
Reply to George Biggs

The status quo of the past 16 years have not met the threshold of international law. Perhaps you’d have a different perspective if the roles were reversed and these populations had switched places during that time? Would they’ve resisted? After how long? And how? (Frankly, even the suggestion seems audacious. Yet the reality has played out for one of the groups, hasn’t it?) 
 
 
Robert McGraw
Reply to George Biggs
Plus it’s been confirmed by the US that a warning came from Egypt just days before and STILL the intelligence breakdown occurred. Seems hardly coincidental. 
 
 
 
 
ralph jacobs
This is open but serious goings on in the world aren't. And we pay for this!
 
 
David R. Amos 
Reply to ralph jacobs
Relax and enjoy the circus 
 
 
 
 
 
Bill Roderick
Fossil gas? Has this guy taken any science or chemistry? Methane is abundant in the universe and it’s in our mantle. Volcanos release it all the time. That anyone buys what he’s saying tells us much about the sorry state of education in Canada.
 
 
David R. Amos 
Reply to Bill Roderick
Amen
 
 
Martin Damus
Reply to Bill Roderick
The natural gas extracted from the ground is fossilised animal and plant matter. That's the important part. Not volcanoes. 
 
 
Walter Vrbetic
Reply to Bill Roderick
Methane when burned releases CO2...

Methane, when it escapes directly into the atmosphere, though not as long lived, is 80 times more effective as a greenhouse gas than CO2.

 
Isabella Carter 
Reply to Bill Roderick
You're right what does a chemical engineer know
 
 
Isabella Carter
Reply to David R. Amos
O & G co, DS and pp called they need their false talking points back.
 
 
Andrew Hillman  
Reply to Isabella Carter 
I'm a chemical engineer. If you want to be completely accurate, it's primary constituent is called methane. It's found naturally, no problem calling it natural gas.
 
 
David R. Amos 
Reply to Isabella Carter 
Duly noted 
 

Bill Roderick
Reply to Walter Vrbetic
Yes it is a far more potent greenhouse gas. Make sure you protest the volcanos. They should know better.
 
 
Walter Vrbetic
Reply to Bill Roderick
Volcanos are reaponsible for 1/60 the total volume of human released greenhouse gases...
 
 
 

 
 
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment