---------- Original message ---------
From: Holt, Susan Premier (PO/CPM) <Susan.Holt@gnb.ca>
Date: Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 11:43 AM
Subject: Automatic reply: Premier Susan Holt and her new cabinet know some folks have a long memory and keep good records as well EH Ian Lee?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
From: Holt, Susan Premier (PO/CPM) <Susan.Holt@gnb.ca>
Date: Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 11:43 AM
Subject: Automatic reply: Premier Susan Holt and her new cabinet know some folks have a long memory and keep good records as well EH Ian Lee?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. This account receives a high volume of emails. Thank you for your patience as our team prepares a response.
–
Merci pour votre courriel. Ce compte reçoit un grand volume de courriels. Nous vous remercions de votre patience pendant que notre équipe prépare une réponse.---------- Original message ---------
From: Bockus, Kathy (LEG) <Kathy.Bockus@gnb.ca>
Date: Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 11:43 AM
Subject: Automatic reply: Premier Susan Holt and her new cabinet know some folks have a long memory and keep good records as well EH Ian Lee?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
From: Bockus, Kathy (LEG) <Kathy.Bockus@gnb.ca>
Date: Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 11:43 AM
Subject: Automatic reply: Premier Susan Holt and her new cabinet know some folks have a long memory and keep good records as well EH Ian Lee?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. I will respond as soon as I can.
---------- Original message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 11:43 AM
Subject: Premier Susan Holt and her new cabinet know some folks have a long memory and keep good records as well EH Ian Lee?
To: ltgov <ltgov@gnb.ca>, jake.stewart <jake.stewart@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, Katie.Telford <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, rob.moore <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, John.Williamson <John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, Richard.Bragdon <Richard.Bragdon@parl.gc.ca>, <Rob.weir.riverview@gmail.com>, <DonMonahan@hotmail.com>, <ian.lee@gnb.ca>, kathy.bockus <kathy.bockus@gnb.ca>, Tammy.Scott-Wallace <Tammy.Scott-Wallace@gnb.ca>, sherry.wilson <sherry.wilson@gnb.ca>, mary.wilson <mary.wilson@gnb.ca>, Ryan.Cullins <Ryan.Cullins@gnb.ca>, Richard.Ames <Richard.Ames@gnb.ca>, Glen.Savoie <Glen.Savoie@gnb.ca>, kris.austin <kris.austin@gnb.ca>, michelle.conroy <michelle.conroy@gnb.ca>, Margaret.Johnson <Margaret.Johnson@gnb.ca>, Bill.Oliver <Bill.Oliver@gnb.ca>, Bill.Hogan <Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>, Mike.Dawson <Mike.Dawson@gnb.ca>, robert.gauvin <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, robert.mckee <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, Mike.Comeau <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, Susan.Holt <Susan.Holt@gnb.ca>
Cc: darrow.macintyre <darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, pierre.poilievre <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, local <local@chco.tv>
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 11:43 AM
Subject: Premier Susan Holt and her new cabinet know some folks have a long memory and keep good records as well EH Ian Lee?
To: ltgov <ltgov@gnb.ca>, jake.stewart <jake.stewart@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, Katie.Telford <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, rob.moore <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, John.Williamson <John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, Richard.Bragdon <Richard.Bragdon@parl.gc.ca>, <Rob.weir.riverview@gmail.com>, <DonMonahan@hotmail.com>, <ian.lee@gnb.ca>, kathy.bockus <kathy.bockus@gnb.ca>, Tammy.Scott-Wallace <Tammy.Scott-Wallace@gnb.ca>, sherry.wilson <sherry.wilson@gnb.ca>, mary.wilson <mary.wilson@gnb.ca>, Ryan.Cullins <Ryan.Cullins@gnb.ca>, Richard.Ames <Richard.Ames@gnb.ca>, Glen.Savoie <Glen.Savoie@gnb.ca>, kris.austin <kris.austin@gnb.ca>, michelle.conroy <michelle.conroy@gnb.ca>, Margaret.Johnson <Margaret.Johnson@gnb.ca>, Bill.Oliver <Bill.Oliver@gnb.ca>, Bill.Hogan <Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>, Mike.Dawson <Mike.Dawson@gnb.ca>, robert.gauvin <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, robert.mckee <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, Mike.Comeau <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, Susan.Holt <Susan.Holt@gnb.ca>
Cc: darrow.macintyre <darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, pierre.poilievre <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, local <local@chco.tv>
Swearing-In Ceremony; Nov 2nd, 2024; Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick; Fredericton, NB.
Saturday 2 November 2024
Premier-designate Susan Holt, new cabinet to be sworn in at legislature
Susan Holt, new cabinet sworn in at legislature
Ceremony marks transfer of power to new provincial government, with 1st woman at the helm
The legislative chamber was overcome with applause when New Brunswick's lieutenant-governor, smiling wide, addressed Susan Holt for the first time as "Madam Premier."
Holt, a Liberal who won the premier's job almost two weeks ago, was sworn in, along with her cabinet, during a Saturday afternoon ceremony in Fredericton.
The event marks the official transfer of responsibility from Blaine Higgs, the outgoing Progressive Conservative premier, and his cabinet after voters elected a Liberal majority on Oct. 21. It also officially makes Holt the first woman to be New Brunswick's premier.
Holt smiles up at the gallery during her swearing-in ceremony. (Michael Hawkins/The Canadian Press)
Speaking with reporters outside the legislature, Holt's voice broke as she described the time since Oct. 21.
"It has been the best days of my life," she said.
After being sworn in, Holt took a moment to recognize all of the women who have previously served as members of the assembly — asking those in attendance to rise.
While former Liberal MLAs like Aldéa Landry were present, so were incoming Progressive Conservative MLAs Sherry Wilson and Tammy Scott-Wallace, incoming Green Party MLA Megan Mitton and several former cabinet ministers who served with Higgs.
"The women who came before me paved the way. And every single one of them that got elected made it a little bit easier for the next of us to get here. I wouldn't be here if it weren't for them," Holt said.
Holt invited former and current female MLAs to join her for Saturday's ceremony. (Savannah Awde/CBC)
"I wanted to make sure that they had an opportunity to be a part of the day, because I think it's something that many of them have wished for, for longer than I have."
Arlene Dunn, who held several ministerial roles in the Higgs government but resigned as a cabinet minister and MLA in February, was among them. She said Holt invited her to attend Saturday's ceremony.
"It's probably cliché to say there's that empathy piece, there's that compassion piece, but that really does matter to people. And I think that's what it's going to take to move our province forward. We don't need division," Dunn said.
"I'm really excited for the future.... I think she's going to do an amazing job."
Arlene
Dunn, who held several ministerial positions in the former government
of Blaine Higgs, attended Holt's swearing-in ceremony. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)
Former NDP MLA Elizabeth Weir, New Brunswick's first female party leader to win a seat in the legislature, said she hopes Holt's win will open the door to more women running for office.
"There are those rare moments in your life where you are able to experience a moment of history, and that's what happened this afternoon in the chamber," Weir said.
"I'm just feeling a sense of the profound change that we can make. It often doesn't happen overnight ... but it is just reassuring that things can move forward."
Jill Green, a minister under Higgs who lost her seat in the election, called the day momentous for all New Brunswickers but especially for women in the province.
Holt says New Brunswick's newly elected Legislative Assembly will sit on Nov. 19. (Savannah Awde/CBC)
Wolastoqey elder Opolahsomuwehs, whose English name is Imelda Perley, held a blanket ceremony for Holt after the swearing-in.
"Whenever we visited each other before electricity ... blankets were very revered as a protection," she said. "We wanted to protect the leader for doing something different than what any other leader has ever done."
At a ceremony earlier on Saturday, all members of the Legislative Assembly were sworn in.
Lt.-Gov. Brenda Murphy called the moment "her-storical," as New Brunswick elected a record-high number of women to the assembly, with 17 of 49.
Holt announced her cabinet and House leadership selections on Friday.
On Saturday, she said the first meeting of cabinet will take place on Monday, and the legislative sitting will begin on Nov. 19.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Premier-designate Susan Holt, new cabinet to be sworn in at legislature
Ceremony marks transfer of power to new provincial government, first woman at the helm
Susan Holt, who won the premier's job almost two weeks ago, will be sworn in Saturday, along with her cabinet, in a ceremony at the New Brunswick Legislature.
The event will mark the official transfer of responsibility from Blaine Higgs, the outgoing Progressive Conservative premier, and his cabinet after voters elected a Liberal majority on Oct. 21.
It will also officially make Holt the first woman to become premier in New Brunswick.
The weekend ceremony will be led by Lt.-Gov. Brenda Murphy and attended by the new members of the legislative assembly — who will be sworn in earlier on Saturday morning.
Holt announced her cabinet and house leadership selections on Friday.
St. Thomas University political scientist Jamie Gillies noted it is a larger cabinet — with 19 incoming ministers compared to the 16 outgoing.
"You add in an additional five MLAs who will serve as the leadership in the legislature, the Speaker that they have nominated, as well as the deputy speakers and the whip and house leader," he said.
"That constitutes 25 of Susan Holt's 31 Liberal MLAs. So it's a lot of the elected Liberal MLAs are in leadership positions in a Susan Holt cabinet."
Political
scientist Jamie Gillies noted the new cabinet is larger than the last,
with 19 ministers incoming, including Holt, compared to 16 outgoing. (Gilles Landry/Radio-Canada)
Gillies said this largely matches Holt's messaging to date about her leadership style.
"That may be how she introduces this cabinet, in talking about a first-among-equals-style cabinet, where yes, she is the first minister, but there will be some consensus decision-making on a lot of issues," he said.
While new legislation requires approval by the legislative assembly, with a new cabinet sworn in, regulatory changes could be made ahead of a sitting, Gillies said.
The ceremony at the legislature will begin at 2 p.m.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
---------- Original message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 12:50 PM
Subject: Fwd: Need I remind Higgy and Holland that some folks have a long memory and keep good records as well?
To: <media-medias@gnb.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>, <chuck.chiasson@gnb.ca>, <jean-claude.d'amours@gnb.ca>, <francine.landry@gnb.ca>, <jacques.j.leblanc@gnb.ca>, <benoit.bourque@gnb.ca>, <gilles.lepage@gnb.ca>, guy.arseneault <guy.arseneault@gnb.ca>, <daniel.guitard@gnb.ca>, <rene.legacy@gnb.ca>, <denis.landry2@gnb.ca>, <isabelle.theriault@gnb.ca>, <eric.mallet@gnb.ca>, <keith.chiasson@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, jake.stewart <jake.stewart@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, Katie.Telford <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, Ian.Shugart <Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 12:50 PM
Subject: Fwd: Need I remind Higgy and Holland that some folks have a long memory and keep good records as well?
To: <media-medias@gnb.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>, <chuck.chiasson@gnb.ca>, <jean-claude.d'amours@gnb.ca>, <francine.landry@gnb.ca>, <jacques.j.leblanc@gnb.ca>, <benoit.bourque@gnb.ca>, <gilles.lepage@gnb.ca>, guy.arseneault <guy.arseneault@gnb.ca>, <daniel.guitard@gnb.ca>, <rene.legacy@gnb.ca>, <denis.landry2@gnb.ca>, <isabelle.theriault@gnb.ca>, <eric.mallet@gnb.ca>, <keith.chiasson@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, jake.stewart <jake.stewart@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, Katie.Telford <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, Ian.Shugart <Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 15:31:18 +0000
Subject: RE: Need I remind Higgy and Holland that some folks have a
long memory and keep good records as well?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.
If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.
Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.
Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
pour examen et considération.
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144 or by email
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswic
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministr
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Bockus, Kathy (LEG)" <Kathy.Bockus@gnb.ca>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 15:31:19 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Need I remind Higgy and Holland that some
folks have a long memory and keep good records as well?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
If your request is constituency related, please contact Gillian Scott
at my Constituency office in St. Stephen at Gillian.Scott@gnb.ca or by
phone at 506-466-1449.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Si votre demande est liée à la circonscription, veuillez contacter
Shelley McKeeman à mon bureau de circonscription à St. Stephen à
Shelley.McKeeman@gnb.ca ou par téléphone au 506-466-1449.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 12:29:11 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Need I remind Higgy and Holland that some folks have a
long memory and keep good records as well?
To: Jeff.Carr@gnb.ca, Margaret.Johnson@gnb.ca, Richard.Ames@gnb.ca,
Jill.Green@gnb.ca, Ryan.Cullins@gnb.ca, Gary.Crossman@gnb.ca,
Glen.Savoie@gnb.ca, Bill.Oliver@gnb.ca, Daniel.J.Allain@gnb.ca,
Ernie.Steeves@gnb.ca, Greg.Turner@gnb.ca, maryewilsonMLA@outlook.com,
Sherry.Wilson@gnb.ca, Trevor.Holder@gnb.ca, Bruce.Fitch@gnb.ca,
Kathy.Bockus@gnb.ca, Arlene.Dunn@gnb.ca, Dorothy.Shephard@gnb.ca,
Tammy.Scott-Wallace@gnb.ca, claude.williams@pcnb.ca, "Robert. Jones"
<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, oldmaison
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, "andrea.johnson"
<andrea.johnson@pcnb.org>, jenica.atwin@parl.gc.ca,
dominic.leblanc@parl.gc.ca, nobyrne <nobyrne@unb.ca>,
Paul.D'Astous@gnb.ca, Louis.Leger@gnb.ca, cleveland.allaby@me.com,
Nicolle.Carlin@gnb.ca, Francois.Robichaud@gnb.ca, "tyler.campbell"
<tyler.campbell@gnb.ca>, "nick.brown" <nick.brown@gnb.ca>,
shawn_morrison_1974@icloud.com
andrewjdykeman@gmail.com, bobhatheway@gmail.com, lwyou1@rogers.com,
francineqs@gmail.com, awlebrun@hotmail.com, jd.grant@rogers.com,
ssducks@xplornet.ca, ilecwamh@hotmail.com, charlesdoucet850@gmail.com,
rwillseely@gmail.com, stephan.richard1@gmail.com,
slmaceachern@gmail.com
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca,
"Roger.L.Melanson" <roger.l.melanson@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin"
<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee" <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 14:44:15 -0300
Subject: Need I remind Higgy and Holland that some folks have a long
memory and keep good records as well?
To: andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca, Bruce.Macfarlane@gnb.ca,
marc.martin@snb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca,
kris.austin@gnb.ca, michelle.conroy@gnb.ca,
attorneygeneral@ontario.ca, caroline.mulroneyco@pc.ola.org
rbrossard@contribuables.ca, krondolo@generationscrewed.ca,
federal.director@taxpayer.com, jbowes@taxpayer.com,
Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, Ernie.Steeves@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca,
tyler.campbell@gnb.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,
PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca, premier@gov.bc.ca,
strathmore.brooks@assembly.ab.
calgary.lougheed@assembly.ab.c
premier@gnb.ca, premier@ontario.ca, scott.moe@gov.sk.ca,
premier@gov.ab.ca, premier@leg.gov.mb.ca, ksims@taxpayer.com,
fterrazzano@taxpayer.com, pmacpherson@taxpayer.com,
on.director@taxpayer.com, prairie@taxpayer.com,
Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc
<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, "Mike.Comeau"
<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>,
"Holland, Mike (LEG)" <mike.holland@gnb.ca>, jcarpay
<jcarpay@jccf.ca>, "Petrie, Jamie" <JPetrie@nbpower.com>, "Furey,
John" <john.furey@mcinnescooper.com>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "howard.anglin"
<howard.anglin@gmail.com>, "John.Williamson"
<John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>,
"Ross.Wetmore" <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 14:44:15 -0300
Subject: Need I remind Higgy and Holland that some folks have a long
memory and keep good records as well?
To: andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca, Bruce.Macfarlane@gnb.ca,
marc.martin@snb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca,
kris.austin@gnb.ca, michelle.conroy@gnb.ca,
attorneygeneral@ontario.ca, caroline.mulroneyco@pc.ola.org
rbrossard@contribuables.ca, krondolo@generationscrewed.ca,
federal.director@taxpayer.com, jbowes@taxpayer.com,
Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, Ernie.Steeves@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca,
tyler.campbell@gnb.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,
PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca, premier@gov.bc.ca,
strathmore.brooks@assembly.ab.
calgary.lougheed@assembly.ab.c
premier@gnb.ca, premier@ontario.ca, scott.moe@gov.sk.ca,
premier@gov.ab.ca, premier@leg.gov.mb.ca, ksims@taxpayer.com,
fterrazzano@taxpayer.com, pmacpherson@taxpayer.com,
on.director@taxpayer.com, prairie@taxpayer.com,
Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc
<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, "Mike.Comeau"
<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>,
"Holland, Mike (LEG)" <mike.holland@gnb.ca>, jcarpay
<jcarpay@jccf.ca>, "Petrie, Jamie" <JPetrie@nbpower.com>, "Furey,
John" <john.furey@mcinnescooper.com>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "howard.anglin"
<howard.anglin@gmail.com>, "John.Williamson"
<John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>,
"Ross.Wetmore" <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:38:38 -0400
Subject: Need I remind Higgy and Holland that the "Not So Smart" Meter
hearing in the EUB begins on Monday?
To: andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca, Bruce.Macfarlane@gnb.ca,
marc.martin@snb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca,
kris.austin@gnb.ca, rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, serge.gauvin@snb.ca,
michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, attorneygeneral@ontario.ca,
caroline.mulroneyco@pc.ola.org
krondolo@generationscrewed.ca, federal.director@taxpayer.com,
jbowes@taxpayer.com, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, Ernie.Steeves@gnb.ca,
greg.byrne@gnb.ca, tyler.campbell@gnb.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,
PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca, Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, premier@gov.bc.ca,
maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca, strathmore.brooks@assembly.ab.
brian.hodgson@assembly.ab.ca, calgary.lougheed@assembly.ab.c
leader@freedomconservativepart
premier@ontario.ca, scott.moe@gov.sk.ca, premier@gov.ab.ca,
premier@leg.gov.mb.ca, ksims@taxpayer.com, fterrazzano@taxpayer.com,
pmacpherson@taxpayer.com, on.director@taxpayer.com,
prairie@taxpayer.com, Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc
brian.gallant@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca,
megan.mitton@gnb.ca, BrianThomasMacdonald
<BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.co
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
jason.humphrey2@gnb.ca, "Furey, John" <jfurey@nbpower.com>, wharrison
<wharrison@nbpower.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 09:31:18 -0400
Subject: Methinks the EUB and Johnny "Never Been Good" Herron in
particular forgot that one Intervener had lots to say EH Mr Furey?
To: andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca, Bruce.Macfarlane@gnb.ca,
marc.martin@snb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca,
kris.austin@gnb.ca, rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, serge.gauvin@snb.ca,
michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, attorneygeneral@ontario.ca,
caroline.mulroneyco@pc.ola.org
krondolo@generationscrewed.ca, federal.director@taxpayer.com,
jbowes@taxpayer.com, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, Ernie.Steeves@gnb.ca,
greg.byrne@gnb.ca, tyler.campbell@gnb.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,
PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca, Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, premier@gov.bc.ca,
maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca, strathmore.brooks@assembly.ab.
brian.hodgson@assembly.ab.ca, calgary.lougheed@assembly.ab.c
leader@freedomconservativepart
premier@ontario.ca, scott.moe@gov.sk.ca, premier@gov.ab.ca,
premier@leg.gov.mb.ca, ksims@taxpayer.com, fterrazzano@taxpayer.com,
pmacpherson@taxpayer.com, on.director@taxpayer.com,
prairie@taxpayer.com, Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc
brian.gallant@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca,
megan.mitton@gnb.ca, BrianThomasMacdonald
<BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.co
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
jason.humphrey2@gnb.ca, "Furey, John" <jfurey@nbpower.com>, wharrison
<wharrison@nbpower.com>
On 7/16/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Campbell, Tyler (ECO/BCE)" <Tyler.Campbell@gnb.ca>
> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 12:11:30 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Paige MacPherson I just called this is
> one of the emails I mentioned
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I am currently out of the office and will be returning on July 22.
>
> From July 15 to 17, please contact Jason Humphrey for assistance at
> jason.humphrey2@gnb.ca. For assistance on July 18 and 19, please
> contact John McNeil at john.mcneil@gnb.ca.
>
> ***
> Je suis actuellement hors du bureau et retournera le 22 Juillet.
>
> Du 15 au 17 juillet, veuillez contacter Jason Humphrey pour obtenir de
> l'aide à l'adresse jason.humphrey2@gnb.ca. Pour obtenir de l'aide les
> 18 et 19 juillet, veuillez contacter John McNeil à john.mcneil@gnb.ca.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Legislative Assembly Office
> <LegislativeAssemblyOffice@ass
> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 12:11:33 +0000
> Subject: RE: Attn Paige MacPherson I just called this is one of the
> emails I mentioned
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Please note that due to an electoral boundary change in the 2019
> Alberta election, this address is no longer valid or accepting email.
> Please refer to the following web site to identify your new MLA and
> constituency contact information.
>
> http://www.assembly.ab.ca/lao/
>
> Thank you
>
> Legislative Assembly Office
>
> [cid:image001.gif@01D4F058.1F3
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
> <Premier@ontario.ca>
> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 12:11:29 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Paige MacPherson I just called this is
> one of the emails I mentioned
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
> valued.
>
> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>
> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
> response may take several business days.
>
> Thanks again for your email.
> ______
>
> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>
> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>
> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>
> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>
>
>
>
>
>> Début du message réexpédié :
>>
>> De: "Mitchell, Kathleen" <Kathleen.Mitchell@nbeub.ca>
>> Objet: Matter 430 - NB Power 2019-2020 General Rate Application / Instance
>> Nº 430 - Énergie NB Demande générale de tarifs pour 2019-2020
>> Date: 16 juillet 2019 08:44:00 UTC−3
>> À: "david.sollows@gnb.ca" <david.sollows@gnb.ca>,
>> "Paul.Volpe@enbridge.com" <Paul.Volpe@enbridge.com>,
>> "dave.lavigne@enbridge.com" <dave.lavigne@enbridge.com>,
>> "Gilles.volpe@enbridge.com" <Gilles.volpe@enbridge.com>,
>> "jeffery.callaghan@mcinnescoop
>> <jeffery.callaghan@mcinnescoop
>> <gerald@kissnb.com>, "cstewart@stewartmckelvey.com"
>> <cstewart@stewartmckelvey.com>
>> <hanrahan.dion@jdirving.com>, "lcozzarini@nbpower.com"
>> <lcozzarini@nbpower.com>, "jfurey@nbpower.com" <jfurey@nbpower.com>,
>> "SWaycott@nbpower.com" <SWaycott@nbpower.com>, "NBPRegulatory@nbpower.com"
>> <NBPRegulatory@nbpower.com>, "wharrison@nbpower.com"
>> <wharrison@nbpower.com>, "bcrawford@nbpower.com" <bcrawford@nbpower.com>,
>> "NConnellyBosse@nbpower.com" <NConnellyBosse@nbpower.com>, "Lawton, John"
>> <John.Lawton@nbeub.ca>, "Desmond, Ellen" <ecdesmond@nbeub.ca>, "Dickie,
>> Michael" <Michael.Dickie@nbeub.ca>, "Young, Dave" <Dave.Young@nbeub.ca>,
>> "Mitchell, Kathleen" <Kathleen.Mitchell@nbeub.ca>, NBEUB/CESPNB
>> <General@nbeub.ca>, "heather.black@gnb.ca" <heather.black@gnb.ca>,
>> "rdk@indecon.com" <rdk@indecon.com>, "rrichard@nb.aibn.com"
>> <rrichard@nb.aibn.com>, "jeff.garrett@sjenergy.com"
>> <jeff.garrett@sjenergy.com>, "dan.dionne@perth-andover.com"
>> <dan.dionne@perth-andover.com>
>> <pierreroy@edmundston.ca>, "ray.robinson@sjenergy.com"
>> <ray.robinson@sjenergy.com>, "sstoll@airdberlis.com"
>> <sstoll@airdberlis.com>, "pzarnett@bdrenergy.com"
>> <pzarnett@bdrenergy.com>, "heather.quinn (heather.quinn@gnb.ca)"
>> <heather.quinn@gnb.ca>, "bill.breckenridge@gnb.ca"
>> <bill.breckenridge@gnb.ca>
>>
>> Good morning,
>>
>> Please note that the New Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board will be
>> releasing the Decision in relation to the above noted Matter at 10:00 AM.
>>
>>
>> Bonjour,
>>
>> Veuillez noter que la Commission de l'énergie et des services publics du
>> Nouveau-Brunswick publiera la décision relative à l’instance susmentionnée
>> à 10 h 00.
>>
>>
>> Kathleen Mitchell
>> Chief Clerk | Greffière en chef
>>
>> Energy & Utilities Board | Commission de l’énergie et des services publics
>> du N.-B.
>> 15 Market Square, Suite 1400
>> Saint John, NB E2L 4Y9
>> 506-643-7324 (direct)
>> 506-658-2504 (reception)
>> Confidentiality Notice
>> This private message (and any attachments) is for the exclusive use of the
>> individual for whom, or entity for which, it is intended. It may contain
>> information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure by
>> law. Its author does not waive the protection afforded to it under
>> applicable law. Disclosure to anyone other than the intended recipient
>> does not constitute waiver of privilege. Its possession or usage, by any
>> person other than the one for whom it is intended, is not authorized by
>> its author and is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
>> communication in error, please notify us immediately, at our expense, by
>> telephone at (506) 658-2504. Also, if you received this email in error,
>> delete it and any attachments from your computer system and records. Thank
>> you.
>> Avis de confidentialité
>> Ce message privé (et toutes les pièces jointes) est à l'usage exclusif de
>> la personne pour laquelle ou entité pour laquelle, il est destiné. Il peut
>> contenir des informations qui sont personnelles, confidentielles ou
>> exemptées de la divulgation par la loi. Son auteur ne renonce pas à la
>> protection accordée en vertu de la loi applicable. Sa divulgation à toute
>> personne autre que son destinataire ne constitue pas une renonciation de
>> privilège. Sa possession ou l'utilisation, par une personne autre que
>> celle pour laquelle il est destiné, n'est pas autorisée par son auteur et
>> est strictement interdite. Si vous recevez cette communication par
>> erreur, veuillez nous appeler dans les plus brefs délais, à frais virés,
>> au (506) 658-2504. Aussi, si vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur,
>> veuillez effacer ce courriel, ainsi que les pièces jointes, de votre
>> système informatique et de vos dossiers. Merci.
>
>
>
>
> On 7/16/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Paige MacPherson
>> Atlantic Director
>> Office Location: MAILING ADDRESS ONLY: 5201 Duke St PO Box 34077
>> Scotia Square Halifax, NS B3J 1N0
>> Phone: 902.717.7078 / TOLL FREE: 1.877.909.5757
>> E-mail: pmacpherson@taxpayer.com
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 09:44:39 -0400
>> Subject: Re: Methinks Deputy Premier Robert Gauvin must have noticed
>> his fellow SANB comedian the overpaid underworked bureaucrat Marc
>> Martin at play in CBC again today N'esy Pas?
>> To: andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca, Bruce.Macfarlane@gnb.ca,
>> marc.martin@snb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca,
>> kris.austin@gnb.ca, rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, serge.gauvin@snb.ca,
>> michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, attorneygeneral@ontario.ca,
>> caroline.mulroneyco@pc.ola.org
>> krondolo@generationscrewed.ca, federal.director@taxpayer.com,
>> jbowes@taxpayer.com, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, Ernie.Steeves@gnb.ca,
>> greg.byrne@gnb.ca, tyler.campbell@gnb.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,
>> PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca, Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, premier@gov.bc.ca,
>> maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca, strathmore.brooks@assembly.ab.
>> brian.hodgson@assembly.ab.ca, calgary.lougheed@assembly.ab.c
>> leader@freedomconservativepart
>> premier@ontario.ca, scott.moe@gov.sk.ca, premier@gov.ab.ca,
>> premier@leg.gov.mb.ca, ksims@taxpayer.com, fterrazzano@taxpayer.com,
>> pmacpherson@taxpayer.com, on.director@taxpayer.com,
>> prairie@taxpayer.com, Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc
>> brian.gallant@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca,
>> megan.mitton@gnb.ca
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> <BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.co
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Gallant, Brian (LEG)" <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 13:31:40 +0000
>> Subject: RE: Methinks Deputy Premier Robert Gauvin must have noticed
>> his fellow SANB comedian the overpaid underworked bureaucrat Marc
>> Martin at play in CBC again today N'esy Pas?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for writing to the Leader of the Official Opposition of New
>> Brunswick. Please be assured that your e-mail will be reviewed.
>>
>> If this is a media request, please forward your e-mail to
>> ashley.beaudin@gnb.ca<mailto:m
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le chef de l’opposition
>> officielle du Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel
>> sera examiné.
>>
>> Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à
>> ashley.beaudin@gnb.ca<mailto:m
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Martin, Marc (SNB)" <Marc.Martin@snb.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 13:31:22 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Deputy Premier Robert Gauvin must
>> have noticed his fellow SANB comedian the overpaid underworked
>> bureaucrat Marc Martin at play in CBC again today N'esy Pas?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>>
>> Je serai absent du bureau le 8 janvier 2018. Pour des questions
>> de traduction, veuillez communiquer avec Cindy Dempsey par téléphone
>> au 444-2563 ou par courriel à l'adresse cindy.dempsey@snb.ca.
>>
>> I will be away from the office on January 8th, 2018. For
>> translation-related questions, please contact Cindy Dempsey 444-2563
>> ou par courriel à l'adresse cindy.dempsey@snb.ca.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 09:11:48 -0400
>> Subject: Hey Serge Trust that the First Canadian Title people, the
>> Fidelity minions and many lawyers will tell you that I will figure out
>> what a form 13a is.
>> To: serge.gauvin@snb.ca, patrick.windle@snb.ca, "claude.poirier"
>> <claude.poirier@snb.ca>, "john.mcnair" <john.mcnair@snb.ca>,
>> Erin.Hardy@snb.ca, "alan.roy" <alan.roy@snb.ca>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>,
>> MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb
>> <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, kevhache@nb.sympatico.ca, "greg.byrne"
>> <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, krisaustin <krisaustin@peoplesalliance.ca
>> "David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
>> <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
>>
>> Serge Gauvin
>> Registrar General of Land Titles
>> Called to the bar: 1995 (NB)
>> Phone: 506-457-6933
>> Fax: 506-444-3033
>> Email: serge.gauvin@snb.ca
>> Patrick V. Windle
>> Deputy Registrar General of Land Titles
>> Called to the bar: 1997 (NB)
>> Email: patrick.windle@snb.ca
>> Service New Brunswick
>> Land Registry, 985 College Hill Rd.
>> PO Box 1998, Stn. A
>> Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5G4
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "Auto-reply from kevhache@nb.aibn.com" <kevhache@nb.aibn.com>
>> Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2018 18:20:04 -0400
>> Subject: Re: Too Funny I just talked to Claude Landry Elvy Robichaud’s
>> old Chief of Staff He forgot what went down in 2004 and the emails I
>> sent him since
>> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.co
>>
>> Bonjour
>>
>> Je serais absent du bureau du 6 aout au 22 aout inclusivement. Le
>> bureau sera fermé du 6 au 19 aout inclusivement pour les vacances d
>> ete et sera ouvert a partir du 20 aout. Bonne Vacance a tous
>>
>> Je retournerais votre courriel a mon retour.
>>
>> Kevin J. Hache
>>
>> CABINET KEVIN J. HACHE
>> 8 Boul St-Pierre Ouest
>> C.P. 5662
>> Caraquet NB E1W 1B7
>> 506 727 5150 (telephone)
>> 506 727 6686 (telecopieur)
>> kevhache@nb.sympatico.ca
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Brian Gallant <briangallant10@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 06:01:57 -0700
>> Subject: Merci / Thank you Re: Fwd: I just called Alan Roy again about
>> my right to health care, my missing 1965 Harley, the Yankee Wiretaps
>> tapes in its saddlebag and Federal Court and his assistant played dumb
>> as usual
>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> (Français à suivre)
>>
>> If your email is pertaining to the Government of New Brunswick, please
>> email me at brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>>
>> If your matter is urgent, please email Greg Byrne at greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Si votre courriel s'addresse au Gouvernement du Nouveau-Brunswick,
>> svp m'envoyez un courriel à brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>>
>> Pour les urgences, veuillez contacter Greg Byrne à greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>>
>> Merci.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 10:42:09 -0400
>> Subject: Attn Marc Richard and John McNair I just called AGAIN Say hey
>> to my Brother in Law W. S. Reid CHEDORE and his brother of the law
>> David Lutz QC for me will ya?
>> To: MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb
>> "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, Erin.Hardy@snb.ca,
>> David.Eidt@gnb.ca
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.n
>> Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 22:51:09 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Irving's ridiculous constitutional
>> challenge and Federal Court File no T-1557-15 I wonder if George
>> Cooper and Hélène Beaulieure even know how many times the Irvings and
>> partners of their VERY snobby law firm have offended me over t...
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I will be out of the office until October 30, 2017. Je serai absent
>> du bureau jusqu'au 30 octobre 2017.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Eidt, David (OAG/CPG)" <David.Eidt@gnb.ca>
>> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:33:21 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Mr Lutz howcome your buddy the clerk
>> would not file this motion and properly witnessed affidavit and why
>> did she take all four copies?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I will be out of the office until Monday, March 13, 2017. I will have
>> little to no access to email. Please dial 453-2222 for assistance.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.n
>> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:16:46 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
>> Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I will be out of the office until August 15, 2016. Je serai absent du
>> bureau jusqu'au 15 août 2016.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "McNair, John (SNB)" <John.McNair@snb.ca>
>> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:04:29 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
>> Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I will be out of the office August 1 - August 12. I will reply to your
>> email when I return. If you require immediate assistance, please
>> contact Chantal Leger at 663-2510. Thank you.
>>
>> Je serai absent du bureau les 1 aout - 12 aout. Je répondrai à votre
>> courriel à mon retour. Si vous nécessitez de l'assistance
>> immédiatement, veuillez contacter Chantal Leger au 663-2510. Merci.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Hardy, Erin (SNB)" <Erin.Hardy@snb.ca>
>> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:04:28 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
>> Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Le francais suit:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am currently out of the office. I will gladly reply to your message
>> upon my return on August 15, 2016. Should you require immediate
>> assitance please contact Celeste Savoie at (506) 471-5290 or by email:
>> Celeste.Savoie@snb.ca.
>>
>> Have a nice day!
>>
>> Bonjour,
>>
>> Je suis presentement hors du bureau. Il me fera plaisir de repondre a
>> votre message a mon retour August 15, 2016. Si vous avez besoin d'une
>> assitance immediate, veuillez communiquer avec Celeste Savoie au (506)
>> 471-5290 ou par courriel a: Celeste.Savoie@snb.ca.
>>
>> Bonne journee!
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.n
>> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:43:27 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Oh My My we just talked briefly Correct Ms
>> Beaulieu? It appears to me that the latest President of the NB Law
>> Society thinks non lawyers are not worth talking to
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I will be out of the office until July 21, 2014. Je serai absent du
>> bureau jusqu'au 21 juillet 2014.
>>
>>
>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Good Day Sir
>>>
>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>
>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>
>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>
>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>
>>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>>
>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/Ba
>>>
>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Ja
>>>
>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/Ap
>>>
>>>
>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>
>>>
>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>
>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/Ma
>>>
>>>
>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>
>>> Date: 20151223
>>>
>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>
>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>
>>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>>
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>
>>> Plaintiff
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>
>>> Defendant
>>>
>>> ORDER
>>>
>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>
>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>> in its entirety.
>>>
>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>>> he stated:
>>>
>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>
>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>> Police.
>>>
>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>
>>>
>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>
>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>> Judge
>>>
>>>
>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>
>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>
>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>> most
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>>> dudes are way past too late
>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>
>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>
>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Merci ,
>>>
>>>
>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogs
>>>
>>>
>>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>
>>> January 13, 2015
>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>
>>> December 8, 2014
>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>
>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>
>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>
>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>
>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>
>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>
>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>
>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>>
>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>
>>> Subject:
>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>
>>> January 30, 2007
>>>
>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>
>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>
>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>
>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>> Minister of Health
>>>
>>> CM/cb
>>>
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>
>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Fo
>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>
>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>
>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>
>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Mr. Amos,
>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>
>> Department of Justice
>>
>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>
>>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogsp
>>> ilian.html
>>>
>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/s
>>>>
>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
>>>>
>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>>> cards?
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/ITr
>>>> 6
>>>>
>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2
>>>>
>>>> http://www.archive.org/details
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/Par
>>>>
>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>> United States Senate
>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>
>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>> tapes.
>>>>
>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>>
>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogs
>>
>>
>>
>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>> The Supreme Court
>>
>> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.
>>
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>
>> Amos v. Canada
>> Court (s) Database
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>> Date
>>
>> 2017-10-30
>> Neutral citation
>>
>> 2017 FCA 213
>> File numbers
>>
>> A-48-16
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>
>> THE COURT
>>
>>
>>
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>
>> I. Introduction
>>
>> [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>
>> [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>
>>
>> [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
>> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>
>>
>> [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal.
>>
>>
>> II. Preliminary Matter
>>
>> [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>
>> [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>> c. F-7:
>>
>>
>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>> Appeal.
>> […]
>>
>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>> […]
>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>
>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>
>>
>> [7] However, these subsections only provide that the
>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>> section.
>> [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>> that:
>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>> matière civile et pénale.
>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>
>>
>> [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
>> appeal book.
>>
>>
>> [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>
>>
>> [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>
>>
>> [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>> such judge had a conflict.
>>
>>
>> [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>> was a member of such firm.
>>
>>
>> [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>
>>
>> [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>> [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>> apprehension of bias:
>> 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>
>> [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>> (4th) 193).
>>
>> [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
>> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>> 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>
>>
>> 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>
>>
>> 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>
>>
>> 30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>> To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>> 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>
>>
>> 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
>> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>> events from over a decade ago.
>> (emphasis added)
>>
>> [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>
>> [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>
>> [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>
>> [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>
>> [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
>> to recuse himself.
>>
>> [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>
>> [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
>> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>
>>
>> III. Issue
>>
>> [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>
>> IV. Analysis
>>
>> A. Standard of Review
>>
>> [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>
>> [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>> interfere.
>>
>>
>> B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>
>> [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>
>> 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>> (…)
>>
>>
>> 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
>> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>> [footnotes omitted].
>>
>>
>> [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>> para. 27).
>>
>>
>> [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>
>>
>> [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>
>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>
>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>>
>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>
>> [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>
>> [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>
>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>> of process…
>>
>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>
>> [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>
>> [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
>> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>> supporting a cause of action.
>>
>> [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>
>> V. Conclusion
>> [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>> without leave to amend.
>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>> J.A.
>> "David G. Near"
>> J.A.
>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>> J.A.
>>
>>
>>
>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>
>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>> DOCKET:
>>
>> A-48-16
>>
>>
>>
>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>>
>>
>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>
>> Fredericton,
>> New Brunswick
>>
>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>
>> May 24, 2017
>>
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>> DATED:
>>
>> October 30, 2017
>>
>> APPEARANCES:
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>>
>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>> (on his own behalf)
>>
>> Jan Jensen
>>
>>
>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>
>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>>
>> https://www.facebook.com/
>>
>> John Williamson - Conservative Nomination Candidate New Brunswick
>> Southwest
>> May 17 at 12:48pm ·
>>
>> Great news! John Williamson is running for the federal Conservative
>> nomination in New Brunswick Southwest. He needs your help to secure
>> the riding and defeat the Trudeau Liberals in 2019.
>>
>> Having served as Member of Parliament from 2011-2015, he knows the
>> issues, has proven ability, and can win: John had the highest
>> Conservative vote — 38.6% — of all 32 ridings in Atlantic Canada in
>> 2015. It wasn’t enough to get over the top, but it was a clear signal
>> that his local campaign was strong.
>>
>> How can you help? Only current Conservative Party members can vote for
>> John in the nomination, so please signup or renew your membership
>> here: https://donate.conservative.
>>
>> There are also envelopes that need stuffing, phone calls that need to
>> be made, and events already planned.
>>
>> Contact John today by e-mail at VoteJohnW@gmail.com or call
>> 506-466-8347 to let him know how you can help!
>>
>> Unsure if your membership is current? Feel free to contact John and
>> ask. His team can make sure you’re all set to vote.
>>
>> And be sure to share and follow this page for updates on his campaign
>> and to learn about upcoming events.
>>
>> Go John! And Vote John W!
>>
>> Progressive Conservative MLA calls it quits at provincial level
>> Brian Macdonald won't run again for legislature seat, but might try
>> federal politics
>> CBC News · Posted: May 28, 2018 6:07 PM AT | Last Updated: May 28
>> Brian Macdonald, a Progressive Conservative MLA, has announced he
>> won't run in the Sept. 24 provincial election. (CBC)
>>
>> New Brunswick's Progressive Conservative party is losing one of its
>> highest-profile MLAs just months before the next provincial election.
>>
>> Brian Macdonald says he won't be a candidate this fall and may instead
>> jump into federal politics.
>>
>> Calling the last year "my best year in politics," the two-term MLA
>> said his decision has nothing to do with PC Leader Blaine Higgs, who
>> beat Macdonald for the party leadership in 2016.
>>
>> "It's been a really good year," Macdonald said. "I've had a strong
>> voice in the legislature on issues that are really important to my
>> heart.
>>
>> "I also think it can be a challenge being in provincial politics. It's
>> very small, it's very close, it's very tight, and on a personal basis,
>> I want to move on."
>>
>> Macdonald says he’s considering running for the federal Conservative
>> nomination in New Brunswick Southwest, which includes part of the
>> riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell, where he has been the MLA. (CBC)
>>
>> Macdonald said he's considering running for the federal Conservative
>> nomination in New Brunswick Southwest, a constituency that includes
>> part of Macdonald's provincial riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell.
>>
>> Health critic slams 'gutting' of top doctor's office
>>
>> Blaine Higgs faces internal PC dissent over appointment
>>
>> That decision would pit him against former Conservative MP John
>> Williamson, who announced May 21 he'll also seek the nomination in the
>> riding he represented from 2011 to 2015. Party members in the riding
>> will nominate their candidate June 28.
>>
>> Macdonald said he'll also consider running federally in Fredericton.
>> The former soldier said he's also looking at job opportunities with
>> national organizations that advocate for veterans.
>>
>> "I'm looking for opportunities and considering a lot of options," he
>> said.
>>
>> Blaine Higgs wins N.B. PC leadership race on 3rd ballot
>>
>> Tory leadership hopefuls scramble to be 'second choice' of rivals'
>> supporters
>>
>> Macdonald is the fifth candidate from the 2016 provincial PC
>> leadership race to opt against running in this year's election under
>> Higgs.
>>
>> Macdonald said he is confident he would have won his riding again and
>> the Tories will win the election Sept. 24, meaning he'd have a shot of
>> becoming a minister.
>>
>> But he said being a provincial politician "does wear on you and it
>> does make you think about what the other options are. … If I go
>> another four years in provincial politics, it concerns me that my
>> options would be limited after that."
>>
>> The 47-year-old also said the recent death of some friends made him
>> realize he should pursue other opportunities when he can.
>>
>> Macdonald's interest in federal politics has been well-known for
>> years. He was a political assistant to former federal Defence Minister
>> Peter MacKay and sought the federal Conservative nomination for
>> Fredericton for the 2008 election.
>>
>> After failing to win that nomination, he ran provincially in
>> Fredericton-Silverwood in 2010 and was elected. He was re-elected in
>> the newly created riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell in 2014, when he
>> defeated then-NDP leader Dominic Cardy.
>>
>> Macdonald ran for the leadership of the New Brunswick Progressive
>> Conservative Party but lost to Blaine Higgs. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)
>>
>> In 2016, Macdonald ran for the PC leadership, placing sixth on the
>> first ballot out of seven candidates.
>>
>> Macdonald said he doesn't think his departure will hurt the provincial
>> party's chances of holding on to Fredericton West-Hanwell.
>>
>> "It's going to be very attractive to a number of high-calibre
>> candidates who are now beginning to come forward," he said.
>>
>
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:38:38 -0400
Subject: Need I remind Higgy and Holland that the "Not So Smart" Meter
hearing in the EUB begins on Monday?
To: andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca, Bruce.Macfarlane@gnb.ca,
marc.martin@snb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca,
kris.austin@gnb.ca, rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, serge.gauvin@snb.ca,
michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, attorneygeneral@ontario.ca,
caroline.mulroneyco@pc.ola.org
krondolo@generationscrewed.ca, federal.director@taxpayer.com,
jbowes@taxpayer.com, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, Ernie.Steeves@gnb.ca,
greg.byrne@gnb.ca, tyler.campbell@gnb.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,
PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca, Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, premier@gov.bc.ca,
maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca, strathmore.brooks@assembly.ab.
brian.hodgson@assembly.ab.ca, calgary.lougheed@assembly.ab.c
leader@freedomconservativepart
premier@ontario.ca, scott.moe@gov.sk.ca, premier@gov.ab.ca,
premier@leg.gov.mb.ca, ksims@taxpayer.com, fterrazzano@taxpayer.com,
pmacpherson@taxpayer.com, on.director@taxpayer.com,
prairie@taxpayer.com, Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc
brian.gallant@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca,
megan.mitton@gnb.ca, BrianThomasMacdonald
<BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.co
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
jason.humphrey2@gnb.ca, "Furey, John" <jfurey@nbpower.com>, wharrison
<wharrison@nbpower.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 09:31:18 -0400
Subject: Methinks the EUB and Johnny "Never Been Good" Herron in
particular forgot that one Intervener had lots to say EH Mr Furey?
To: andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca, Bruce.Macfarlane@gnb.ca,
marc.martin@snb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca,
kris.austin@gnb.ca, rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, serge.gauvin@snb.ca,
michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, attorneygeneral@ontario.ca,
caroline.mulroneyco@pc.ola.org
krondolo@generationscrewed.ca, federal.director@taxpayer.com,
jbowes@taxpayer.com, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, Ernie.Steeves@gnb.ca,
greg.byrne@gnb.ca, tyler.campbell@gnb.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,
PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca, Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, premier@gov.bc.ca,
maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca, strathmore.brooks@assembly.ab.
brian.hodgson@assembly.ab.ca, calgary.lougheed@assembly.ab.c
leader@freedomconservativepart
premier@ontario.ca, scott.moe@gov.sk.ca, premier@gov.ab.ca,
premier@leg.gov.mb.ca, ksims@taxpayer.com, fterrazzano@taxpayer.com,
pmacpherson@taxpayer.com, on.director@taxpayer.com,
prairie@taxpayer.com, Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc
brian.gallant@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca,
megan.mitton@gnb.ca, BrianThomasMacdonald
<BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.co
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
jason.humphrey2@gnb.ca, "Furey, John" <jfurey@nbpower.com>, wharrison
<wharrison@nbpower.com>
On 7/16/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Campbell, Tyler (ECO/BCE)" <Tyler.Campbell@gnb.ca>
> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 12:11:30 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Paige MacPherson I just called this is
> one of the emails I mentioned
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I am currently out of the office and will be returning on July 22.
>
> From July 15 to 17, please contact Jason Humphrey for assistance at
> jason.humphrey2@gnb.ca. For assistance on July 18 and 19, please
> contact John McNeil at john.mcneil@gnb.ca.
>
> ***
> Je suis actuellement hors du bureau et retournera le 22 Juillet.
>
> Du 15 au 17 juillet, veuillez contacter Jason Humphrey pour obtenir de
> l'aide à l'adresse jason.humphrey2@gnb.ca. Pour obtenir de l'aide les
> 18 et 19 juillet, veuillez contacter John McNeil à john.mcneil@gnb.ca.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Legislative Assembly Office
> <LegislativeAssemblyOffice@ass
> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 12:11:33 +0000
> Subject: RE: Attn Paige MacPherson I just called this is one of the
> emails I mentioned
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Please note that due to an electoral boundary change in the 2019
> Alberta election, this address is no longer valid or accepting email.
> Please refer to the following web site to identify your new MLA and
> constituency contact information.
>
> http://www.assembly.ab.ca/lao/
>
> Thank you
>
> Legislative Assembly Office
>
> [cid:image001.gif@01D4F058.1F3
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
> <Premier@ontario.ca>
> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 12:11:29 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Paige MacPherson I just called this is
> one of the emails I mentioned
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
> valued.
>
> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>
> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
> response may take several business days.
>
> Thanks again for your email.
> ______
>
> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>
> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>
> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>
> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>
>
>
>
>
>> Début du message réexpédié :
>>
>> De: "Mitchell, Kathleen" <Kathleen.Mitchell@nbeub.ca>
>> Objet: Matter 430 - NB Power 2019-2020 General Rate Application / Instance
>> Nº 430 - Énergie NB Demande générale de tarifs pour 2019-2020
>> Date: 16 juillet 2019 08:44:00 UTC−3
>> À: "david.sollows@gnb.ca" <david.sollows@gnb.ca>,
>> "Paul.Volpe@enbridge.com" <Paul.Volpe@enbridge.com>,
>> "dave.lavigne@enbridge.com" <dave.lavigne@enbridge.com>,
>> "Gilles.volpe@enbridge.com" <Gilles.volpe@enbridge.com>,
>> "jeffery.callaghan@mcinnescoop
>> <jeffery.callaghan@mcinnescoop
>> <gerald@kissnb.com>, "cstewart@stewartmckelvey.com"
>> <cstewart@stewartmckelvey.com>
>> <hanrahan.dion@jdirving.com>, "lcozzarini@nbpower.com"
>> <lcozzarini@nbpower.com>, "jfurey@nbpower.com" <jfurey@nbpower.com>,
>> "SWaycott@nbpower.com" <SWaycott@nbpower.com>, "NBPRegulatory@nbpower.com"
>> <NBPRegulatory@nbpower.com>, "wharrison@nbpower.com"
>> <wharrison@nbpower.com>, "bcrawford@nbpower.com" <bcrawford@nbpower.com>,
>> "NConnellyBosse@nbpower.com" <NConnellyBosse@nbpower.com>, "Lawton, John"
>> <John.Lawton@nbeub.ca>, "Desmond, Ellen" <ecdesmond@nbeub.ca>, "Dickie,
>> Michael" <Michael.Dickie@nbeub.ca>, "Young, Dave" <Dave.Young@nbeub.ca>,
>> "Mitchell, Kathleen" <Kathleen.Mitchell@nbeub.ca>, NBEUB/CESPNB
>> <General@nbeub.ca>, "heather.black@gnb.ca" <heather.black@gnb.ca>,
>> "rdk@indecon.com" <rdk@indecon.com>, "rrichard@nb.aibn.com"
>> <rrichard@nb.aibn.com>, "jeff.garrett@sjenergy.com"
>> <jeff.garrett@sjenergy.com>, "dan.dionne@perth-andover.com"
>> <dan.dionne@perth-andover.com>
>> <pierreroy@edmundston.ca>, "ray.robinson@sjenergy.com"
>> <ray.robinson@sjenergy.com>, "sstoll@airdberlis.com"
>> <sstoll@airdberlis.com>, "pzarnett@bdrenergy.com"
>> <pzarnett@bdrenergy.com>, "heather.quinn (heather.quinn@gnb.ca)"
>> <heather.quinn@gnb.ca>, "bill.breckenridge@gnb.ca"
>> <bill.breckenridge@gnb.ca>
>>
>> Good morning,
>>
>> Please note that the New Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board will be
>> releasing the Decision in relation to the above noted Matter at 10:00 AM.
>>
>>
>> Bonjour,
>>
>> Veuillez noter que la Commission de l'énergie et des services publics du
>> Nouveau-Brunswick publiera la décision relative à l’instance susmentionnée
>> à 10 h 00.
>>
>>
>> Kathleen Mitchell
>> Chief Clerk | Greffière en chef
>>
>> Energy & Utilities Board | Commission de l’énergie et des services publics
>> du N.-B.
>> 15 Market Square, Suite 1400
>> Saint John, NB E2L 4Y9
>> 506-643-7324 (direct)
>> 506-658-2504 (reception)
>> Confidentiality Notice
>> This private message (and any attachments) is for the exclusive use of the
>> individual for whom, or entity for which, it is intended. It may contain
>> information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure by
>> law. Its author does not waive the protection afforded to it under
>> applicable law. Disclosure to anyone other than the intended recipient
>> does not constitute waiver of privilege. Its possession or usage, by any
>> person other than the one for whom it is intended, is not authorized by
>> its author and is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
>> communication in error, please notify us immediately, at our expense, by
>> telephone at (506) 658-2504. Also, if you received this email in error,
>> delete it and any attachments from your computer system and records. Thank
>> you.
>> Avis de confidentialité
>> Ce message privé (et toutes les pièces jointes) est à l'usage exclusif de
>> la personne pour laquelle ou entité pour laquelle, il est destiné. Il peut
>> contenir des informations qui sont personnelles, confidentielles ou
>> exemptées de la divulgation par la loi. Son auteur ne renonce pas à la
>> protection accordée en vertu de la loi applicable. Sa divulgation à toute
>> personne autre que son destinataire ne constitue pas une renonciation de
>> privilège. Sa possession ou l'utilisation, par une personne autre que
>> celle pour laquelle il est destiné, n'est pas autorisée par son auteur et
>> est strictement interdite. Si vous recevez cette communication par
>> erreur, veuillez nous appeler dans les plus brefs délais, à frais virés,
>> au (506) 658-2504. Aussi, si vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur,
>> veuillez effacer ce courriel, ainsi que les pièces jointes, de votre
>> système informatique et de vos dossiers. Merci.
>
>
>
>
> On 7/16/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Paige MacPherson
>> Atlantic Director
>> Office Location: MAILING ADDRESS ONLY: 5201 Duke St PO Box 34077
>> Scotia Square Halifax, NS B3J 1N0
>> Phone: 902.717.7078 / TOLL FREE: 1.877.909.5757
>> E-mail: pmacpherson@taxpayer.com
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 09:44:39 -0400
>> Subject: Re: Methinks Deputy Premier Robert Gauvin must have noticed
>> his fellow SANB comedian the overpaid underworked bureaucrat Marc
>> Martin at play in CBC again today N'esy Pas?
>> To: andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca, Bruce.Macfarlane@gnb.ca,
>> marc.martin@snb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca,
>> kris.austin@gnb.ca, rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, serge.gauvin@snb.ca,
>> michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, attorneygeneral@ontario.ca,
>> caroline.mulroneyco@pc.ola.org
>> krondolo@generationscrewed.ca, federal.director@taxpayer.com,
>> jbowes@taxpayer.com, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, Ernie.Steeves@gnb.ca,
>> greg.byrne@gnb.ca, tyler.campbell@gnb.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,
>> PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca, Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, premier@gov.bc.ca,
>> maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca, strathmore.brooks@assembly.ab.
>> brian.hodgson@assembly.ab.ca, calgary.lougheed@assembly.ab.c
>> leader@freedomconservativepart
>> premier@ontario.ca, scott.moe@gov.sk.ca, premier@gov.ab.ca,
>> premier@leg.gov.mb.ca, ksims@taxpayer.com, fterrazzano@taxpayer.com,
>> pmacpherson@taxpayer.com, on.director@taxpayer.com,
>> prairie@taxpayer.com, Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc
>> brian.gallant@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca,
>> megan.mitton@gnb.ca
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> <BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.co
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Gallant, Brian (LEG)" <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 13:31:40 +0000
>> Subject: RE: Methinks Deputy Premier Robert Gauvin must have noticed
>> his fellow SANB comedian the overpaid underworked bureaucrat Marc
>> Martin at play in CBC again today N'esy Pas?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for writing to the Leader of the Official Opposition of New
>> Brunswick. Please be assured that your e-mail will be reviewed.
>>
>> If this is a media request, please forward your e-mail to
>> ashley.beaudin@gnb.ca<mailto:m
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le chef de l’opposition
>> officielle du Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel
>> sera examiné.
>>
>> Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à
>> ashley.beaudin@gnb.ca<mailto:m
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Martin, Marc (SNB)" <Marc.Martin@snb.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 13:31:22 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Deputy Premier Robert Gauvin must
>> have noticed his fellow SANB comedian the overpaid underworked
>> bureaucrat Marc Martin at play in CBC again today N'esy Pas?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>>
>> Je serai absent du bureau le 8 janvier 2018. Pour des questions
>> de traduction, veuillez communiquer avec Cindy Dempsey par téléphone
>> au 444-2563 ou par courriel à l'adresse cindy.dempsey@snb.ca.
>>
>> I will be away from the office on January 8th, 2018. For
>> translation-related questions, please contact Cindy Dempsey 444-2563
>> ou par courriel à l'adresse cindy.dempsey@snb.ca.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 09:11:48 -0400
>> Subject: Hey Serge Trust that the First Canadian Title people, the
>> Fidelity minions and many lawyers will tell you that I will figure out
>> what a form 13a is.
>> To: serge.gauvin@snb.ca, patrick.windle@snb.ca, "claude.poirier"
>> <claude.poirier@snb.ca>, "john.mcnair" <john.mcnair@snb.ca>,
>> Erin.Hardy@snb.ca, "alan.roy" <alan.roy@snb.ca>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>,
>> MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb
>> <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, kevhache@nb.sympatico.ca, "greg.byrne"
>> <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, krisaustin <krisaustin@peoplesalliance.ca
>> "David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
>> <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
>>
>> Serge Gauvin
>> Registrar General of Land Titles
>> Called to the bar: 1995 (NB)
>> Phone: 506-457-6933
>> Fax: 506-444-3033
>> Email: serge.gauvin@snb.ca
>> Patrick V. Windle
>> Deputy Registrar General of Land Titles
>> Called to the bar: 1997 (NB)
>> Email: patrick.windle@snb.ca
>> Service New Brunswick
>> Land Registry, 985 College Hill Rd.
>> PO Box 1998, Stn. A
>> Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5G4
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "Auto-reply from kevhache@nb.aibn.com" <kevhache@nb.aibn.com>
>> Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2018 18:20:04 -0400
>> Subject: Re: Too Funny I just talked to Claude Landry Elvy Robichaud’s
>> old Chief of Staff He forgot what went down in 2004 and the emails I
>> sent him since
>> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.co
>>
>> Bonjour
>>
>> Je serais absent du bureau du 6 aout au 22 aout inclusivement. Le
>> bureau sera fermé du 6 au 19 aout inclusivement pour les vacances d
>> ete et sera ouvert a partir du 20 aout. Bonne Vacance a tous
>>
>> Je retournerais votre courriel a mon retour.
>>
>> Kevin J. Hache
>>
>> CABINET KEVIN J. HACHE
>> 8 Boul St-Pierre Ouest
>> C.P. 5662
>> Caraquet NB E1W 1B7
>> 506 727 5150 (telephone)
>> 506 727 6686 (telecopieur)
>> kevhache@nb.sympatico.ca
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Brian Gallant <briangallant10@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 06:01:57 -0700
>> Subject: Merci / Thank you Re: Fwd: I just called Alan Roy again about
>> my right to health care, my missing 1965 Harley, the Yankee Wiretaps
>> tapes in its saddlebag and Federal Court and his assistant played dumb
>> as usual
>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> (Français à suivre)
>>
>> If your email is pertaining to the Government of New Brunswick, please
>> email me at brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>>
>> If your matter is urgent, please email Greg Byrne at greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Si votre courriel s'addresse au Gouvernement du Nouveau-Brunswick,
>> svp m'envoyez un courriel à brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>>
>> Pour les urgences, veuillez contacter Greg Byrne à greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>>
>> Merci.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 10:42:09 -0400
>> Subject: Attn Marc Richard and John McNair I just called AGAIN Say hey
>> to my Brother in Law W. S. Reid CHEDORE and his brother of the law
>> David Lutz QC for me will ya?
>> To: MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb
>> "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, Erin.Hardy@snb.ca,
>> David.Eidt@gnb.ca
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.n
>> Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 22:51:09 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Irving's ridiculous constitutional
>> challenge and Federal Court File no T-1557-15 I wonder if George
>> Cooper and Hélène Beaulieure even know how many times the Irvings and
>> partners of their VERY snobby law firm have offended me over t...
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I will be out of the office until October 30, 2017. Je serai absent
>> du bureau jusqu'au 30 octobre 2017.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Eidt, David (OAG/CPG)" <David.Eidt@gnb.ca>
>> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:33:21 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Mr Lutz howcome your buddy the clerk
>> would not file this motion and properly witnessed affidavit and why
>> did she take all four copies?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I will be out of the office until Monday, March 13, 2017. I will have
>> little to no access to email. Please dial 453-2222 for assistance.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.n
>> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:16:46 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
>> Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I will be out of the office until August 15, 2016. Je serai absent du
>> bureau jusqu'au 15 août 2016.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "McNair, John (SNB)" <John.McNair@snb.ca>
>> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:04:29 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
>> Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I will be out of the office August 1 - August 12. I will reply to your
>> email when I return. If you require immediate assistance, please
>> contact Chantal Leger at 663-2510. Thank you.
>>
>> Je serai absent du bureau les 1 aout - 12 aout. Je répondrai à votre
>> courriel à mon retour. Si vous nécessitez de l'assistance
>> immédiatement, veuillez contacter Chantal Leger au 663-2510. Merci.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Hardy, Erin (SNB)" <Erin.Hardy@snb.ca>
>> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:04:28 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
>> Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Le francais suit:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am currently out of the office. I will gladly reply to your message
>> upon my return on August 15, 2016. Should you require immediate
>> assitance please contact Celeste Savoie at (506) 471-5290 or by email:
>> Celeste.Savoie@snb.ca.
>>
>> Have a nice day!
>>
>> Bonjour,
>>
>> Je suis presentement hors du bureau. Il me fera plaisir de repondre a
>> votre message a mon retour August 15, 2016. Si vous avez besoin d'une
>> assitance immediate, veuillez communiquer avec Celeste Savoie au (506)
>> 471-5290 ou par courriel a: Celeste.Savoie@snb.ca.
>>
>> Bonne journee!
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.n
>> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:43:27 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Oh My My we just talked briefly Correct Ms
>> Beaulieu? It appears to me that the latest President of the NB Law
>> Society thinks non lawyers are not worth talking to
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I will be out of the office until July 21, 2014. Je serai absent du
>> bureau jusqu'au 21 juillet 2014.
>>
>>
>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Good Day Sir
>>>
>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>
>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>
>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>
>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>
>>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>>
>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/Ba
>>>
>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Ja
>>>
>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/Ap
>>>
>>>
>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>
>>>
>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>
>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/Ma
>>>
>>>
>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>
>>> Date: 20151223
>>>
>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>
>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>
>>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>>
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>
>>> Plaintiff
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>
>>> Defendant
>>>
>>> ORDER
>>>
>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>
>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>> in its entirety.
>>>
>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>>> he stated:
>>>
>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>
>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>> Police.
>>>
>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>
>>>
>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>
>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>> Judge
>>>
>>>
>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>
>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>
>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>> most
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>>> dudes are way past too late
>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>
>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>
>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Merci ,
>>>
>>>
>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogs
>>>
>>>
>>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>
>>> January 13, 2015
>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>
>>> December 8, 2014
>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>
>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>
>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>
>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>
>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>
>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>
>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>
>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>>
>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>
>>> Subject:
>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>
>>> January 30, 2007
>>>
>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>
>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>
>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>
>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>> Minister of Health
>>>
>>> CM/cb
>>>
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>
>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Fo
>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>
>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>
>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>
>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Mr. Amos,
>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>
>> Department of Justice
>>
>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>
>>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogsp
>>> ilian.html
>>>
>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/s
>>>>
>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
>>>>
>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>>> cards?
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/ITr
>>>> 6
>>>>
>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2
>>>>
>>>> http://www.archive.org/details
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/Par
>>>>
>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>> United States Senate
>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>
>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>> tapes.
>>>>
>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>>
>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogs
>>
>>
>>
>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>> The Supreme Court
>>
>> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.
>>
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>
>> Amos v. Canada
>> Court (s) Database
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>> Date
>>
>> 2017-10-30
>> Neutral citation
>>
>> 2017 FCA 213
>> File numbers
>>
>> A-48-16
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>
>> THE COURT
>>
>>
>>
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>
>> I. Introduction
>>
>> [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>
>> [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>
>>
>> [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
>> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>
>>
>> [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal.
>>
>>
>> II. Preliminary Matter
>>
>> [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>
>> [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>> c. F-7:
>>
>>
>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>> Appeal.
>> […]
>>
>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>> […]
>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>
>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>
>>
>> [7] However, these subsections only provide that the
>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>> section.
>> [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>> that:
>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>> matière civile et pénale.
>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>
>>
>> [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
>> appeal book.
>>
>>
>> [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>
>>
>> [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>
>>
>> [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>> such judge had a conflict.
>>
>>
>> [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>> was a member of such firm.
>>
>>
>> [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>
>>
>> [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>> [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>> apprehension of bias:
>> 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>
>> [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>> (4th) 193).
>>
>> [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
>> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>> 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>
>>
>> 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>
>>
>> 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>
>>
>> 30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>> To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>> 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>
>>
>> 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
>> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>> events from over a decade ago.
>> (emphasis added)
>>
>> [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>
>> [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>
>> [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>
>> [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>
>> [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
>> to recuse himself.
>>
>> [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>
>> [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
>> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>
>>
>> III. Issue
>>
>> [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>
>> IV. Analysis
>>
>> A. Standard of Review
>>
>> [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>
>> [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>> interfere.
>>
>>
>> B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>
>> [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>
>> 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>> (…)
>>
>>
>> 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
>> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>> [footnotes omitted].
>>
>>
>> [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>> para. 27).
>>
>>
>> [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>
>>
>> [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>
>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>
>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>>
>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>
>> [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>
>> [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>
>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>> of process…
>>
>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>
>> [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>
>> [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
>> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>> supporting a cause of action.
>>
>> [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>
>> V. Conclusion
>> [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>> without leave to amend.
>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>> J.A.
>> "David G. Near"
>> J.A.
>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>> J.A.
>>
>>
>>
>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>
>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>> DOCKET:
>>
>> A-48-16
>>
>>
>>
>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>>
>>
>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>
>> Fredericton,
>> New Brunswick
>>
>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>
>> May 24, 2017
>>
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>> DATED:
>>
>> October 30, 2017
>>
>> APPEARANCES:
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>>
>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>> (on his own behalf)
>>
>> Jan Jensen
>>
>>
>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>
>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>>
>> https://www.facebook.com/
>>
>> John Williamson - Conservative Nomination Candidate New Brunswick
>> Southwest
>> May 17 at 12:48pm ·
>>
>> Great news! John Williamson is running for the federal Conservative
>> nomination in New Brunswick Southwest. He needs your help to secure
>> the riding and defeat the Trudeau Liberals in 2019.
>>
>> Having served as Member of Parliament from 2011-2015, he knows the
>> issues, has proven ability, and can win: John had the highest
>> Conservative vote — 38.6% — of all 32 ridings in Atlantic Canada in
>> 2015. It wasn’t enough to get over the top, but it was a clear signal
>> that his local campaign was strong.
>>
>> How can you help? Only current Conservative Party members can vote for
>> John in the nomination, so please signup or renew your membership
>> here: https://donate.conservative.
>>
>> There are also envelopes that need stuffing, phone calls that need to
>> be made, and events already planned.
>>
>> Contact John today by e-mail at VoteJohnW@gmail.com or call
>> 506-466-8347 to let him know how you can help!
>>
>> Unsure if your membership is current? Feel free to contact John and
>> ask. His team can make sure you’re all set to vote.
>>
>> And be sure to share and follow this page for updates on his campaign
>> and to learn about upcoming events.
>>
>> Go John! And Vote John W!
>>
>> Progressive Conservative MLA calls it quits at provincial level
>> Brian Macdonald won't run again for legislature seat, but might try
>> federal politics
>> CBC News · Posted: May 28, 2018 6:07 PM AT | Last Updated: May 28
>> Brian Macdonald, a Progressive Conservative MLA, has announced he
>> won't run in the Sept. 24 provincial election. (CBC)
>>
>> New Brunswick's Progressive Conservative party is losing one of its
>> highest-profile MLAs just months before the next provincial election.
>>
>> Brian Macdonald says he won't be a candidate this fall and may instead
>> jump into federal politics.
>>
>> Calling the last year "my best year in politics," the two-term MLA
>> said his decision has nothing to do with PC Leader Blaine Higgs, who
>> beat Macdonald for the party leadership in 2016.
>>
>> "It's been a really good year," Macdonald said. "I've had a strong
>> voice in the legislature on issues that are really important to my
>> heart.
>>
>> "I also think it can be a challenge being in provincial politics. It's
>> very small, it's very close, it's very tight, and on a personal basis,
>> I want to move on."
>>
>> Macdonald says he’s considering running for the federal Conservative
>> nomination in New Brunswick Southwest, which includes part of the
>> riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell, where he has been the MLA. (CBC)
>>
>> Macdonald said he's considering running for the federal Conservative
>> nomination in New Brunswick Southwest, a constituency that includes
>> part of Macdonald's provincial riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell.
>>
>> Health critic slams 'gutting' of top doctor's office
>>
>> Blaine Higgs faces internal PC dissent over appointment
>>
>> That decision would pit him against former Conservative MP John
>> Williamson, who announced May 21 he'll also seek the nomination in the
>> riding he represented from 2011 to 2015. Party members in the riding
>> will nominate their candidate June 28.
>>
>> Macdonald said he'll also consider running federally in Fredericton.
>> The former soldier said he's also looking at job opportunities with
>> national organizations that advocate for veterans.
>>
>> "I'm looking for opportunities and considering a lot of options," he
>> said.
>>
>> Blaine Higgs wins N.B. PC leadership race on 3rd ballot
>>
>> Tory leadership hopefuls scramble to be 'second choice' of rivals'
>> supporters
>>
>> Macdonald is the fifth candidate from the 2016 provincial PC
>> leadership race to opt against running in this year's election under
>> Higgs.
>>
>> Macdonald said he is confident he would have won his riding again and
>> the Tories will win the election Sept. 24, meaning he'd have a shot of
>> becoming a minister.
>>
>> But he said being a provincial politician "does wear on you and it
>> does make you think about what the other options are. … If I go
>> another four years in provincial politics, it concerns me that my
>> options would be limited after that."
>>
>> The 47-year-old also said the recent death of some friends made him
>> realize he should pursue other opportunities when he can.
>>
>> Macdonald's interest in federal politics has been well-known for
>> years. He was a political assistant to former federal Defence Minister
>> Peter MacKay and sought the federal Conservative nomination for
>> Fredericton for the 2008 election.
>>
>> After failing to win that nomination, he ran provincially in
>> Fredericton-Silverwood in 2010 and was elected. He was re-elected in
>> the newly created riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell in 2014, when he
>> defeated then-NDP leader Dominic Cardy.
>>
>> Macdonald ran for the leadership of the New Brunswick Progressive
>> Conservative Party but lost to Blaine Higgs. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)
>>
>> In 2016, Macdonald ran for the PC leadership, placing sixth on the
>> first ballot out of seven candidates.
>>
>> Macdonald said he doesn't think his departure will hurt the provincial
>> party's chances of holding on to Fredericton West-Hanwell.
>>
>> "It's going to be very attractive to a number of high-calibre
>> candidates who are now beginning to come forward," he said.
>>
>
| 2 attachments | |||
| |||
| |||
---------- Original message ---------
From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Sat, Nov 2, 2024 at 5:54 PM
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Sat, Nov 2, 2024 at 5:54 PM
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Arif Virani, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be carefully reviewed.
We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.
-------------------
Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable Arif Virani, ministre de la Justice et procureur
général du Canada.
En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
avec soin.
Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.
---------- Original message ---------
From: Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>
Date: Sat, Nov 2, 2024 at 5:54 PM
Subject: Thank you for your email
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
From: Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>
Date: Sat, Nov 2, 2024 at 5:54 PM
Subject: Thank you for your email
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
This is to acknowledge that your email has been received by the Office of the Premier.
We appreciate the time you have taken to write.
NOTICE: This e-mail was intended for a specific person. If it has reached you by mistake, please delete it and advise me by return e-mail. Any privilege associated with this information is not waived. Thank you for your cooperation and assistance.
Avis: Ce message est confidentiel, peut être protégé par le secret professionnel et est à l'usage exclusif de son destinataire. Il est strictement interdit à toute autre personne de le diffuser, le distribuer ou le reproduire. Si le destinataire ne peut être joint ou vous est inconnu, veuillez informer l'expéditeur par courrier électronique immédiatement et effacer ce message et en détruire toute copie. Merci de votre cooperation.
---------- Original message ---------
From: Premier of Manitoba <premier@manitoba.ca>
Date: Sat, Nov 2, 2024 at 5:55 PM
Subject: Premier’s Automatic Acknowledgment
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
From: Premier of Manitoba <premier@manitoba.ca>
Date: Sat, Nov 2, 2024 at 5:55 PM
Subject: Premier’s Automatic Acknowledgment
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
On behalf of The Honourable Wab Kinew, Premier of Manitoba, we would like to acknowledge the receipt of your email. Please note that this is an automated response to let you know that your email has been received.
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Premier’s Correspondence Team
******************************
Au nom de Wab Kinew, premier ministre du Manitoba, nous accusons réception de votre courriel. Veuillez noter qu’il s’agit d’un message automatique qui confirme que nous avons bien reçu votre message.
Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
L’Équipe chargée de la correspondance du premier ministre
---------- Original message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Nov 2, 2024 at 5:48 PM
Subject: Fwd: A little Deju Vu for the very sneaky lawyer James Kitchen and his biblepounding buddies
To: premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, pierre.poilievre <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, jagmeet.singh <jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, <ps.ministerofpublicsafety-ministredelasecuritepublique.sp@ps-sp.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, robert.mckee <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, rob.moore <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, ragingdissident <ragingdissident@protonmail.com>, <DerekRants9595@gmail.com>, <doughart.jackson@brunswicknews.com>, <DonMonahan@hotmail.com>, <Rob.weir.riverview@gmail.com>, <roger.song@songhowardlaw.com>
Cc: ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, robert.gauvin <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, kris.austin <kris.austin@gnb.ca>, <kkowalchuk@getzcollins.com>, <doris@reimerllp.com>, <lani@rouillardlaw.ca>, <spiritualelders@hotmail.com>, <info@lawyers4truth.ca>, <cmorgan@westernstandard.news>, <mblack@postmedia.com>, <eccollins64@gmail.com>, Jason Lavigne <jason@yellowhead.vote>
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Nov 2, 2024 at 5:48 PM
Subject: Fwd: A little Deju Vu for the very sneaky lawyer James Kitchen and his biblepounding buddies
To: premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, pierre.poilievre <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, jagmeet.singh <jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, <ps.ministerofpublicsafety-ministredelasecuritepublique.sp@ps-sp.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, robert.mckee <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, rob.moore <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, ragingdissident <ragingdissident@protonmail.com>, <DerekRants9595@gmail.com>, <doughart.jackson@brunswicknews.com>, <DonMonahan@hotmail.com>, <Rob.weir.riverview@gmail.com>, <roger.song@songhowardlaw.com>
Cc: ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, robert.gauvin <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, kris.austin <kris.austin@gnb.ca>, <kkowalchuk@getzcollins.com>, <doris@reimerllp.com>, <lani@rouillardlaw.ca>, <spiritualelders@hotmail.com>, <info@lawyers4truth.ca>, <cmorgan@westernstandard.news>, <mblack@postmedia.com>, <eccollins64@gmail.com>, Jason Lavigne <jason@yellowhead.vote>
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Andrew DeBartolo <adebartolo@
Date: Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 5:52 PM
Subject: Fwd: A little Deju Vu for the very sneaky lawyer James Kitchen and his biblepounding buddies
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
From: Andrew DeBartolo <adebartolo@
Date: Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 5:52 PM
Subject: Fwd: A little Deju Vu for the very sneaky lawyer James Kitchen and his biblepounding buddies
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
HI David,
I
got your email, but I'm not too sure what it all means. There are lots
of automatic replies, and messages that go all the way back to 2015.
What is it you wanted to discuss?
Yours in Christ,
Andrew DeBartolo
Director of Operations, Liberty Coalition Canada
The Arrival of Accountability - Live from Red Deer
Streamed on:
Oct 28, 8:30 pm EDT
The Arrival of Accountability: An Event to Protect Albertans from Future Government Overreach
Join us on October 28, 2024, at 6:30 PM Live from the Legacy Centre Auditorium in Red Deer, Alberta, for The Arrival of Accountability, a critical event to safeguard Alberta’s future against government overreach. This evening brings together top experts, leaders, and advocates dedicated to uncovering the truth behind COVID-19 measures and exploring ways to protect Albertans' rights.
Event Highlights:
• Master of Ceremonies: Tariq Elnaga
•
Dr. William Makis, MD, FRCPC & Friends – Discussing the impact
COVID-19 lockdowns had on children, AHS’s response to government
lockdowns, and necessary reforms within AHS.
• Experts on Legal
Recourse Panelists – Exploring legal remedies to protect individuals and
businesses from government overreach and mandates.
• Drew Barnes
(Former MLA), Rick Strankman (Former MLA), and Art Hanger (Former MP) –
Revealing how quickly legislation can be passed in Alberta, promises
about COVID-related legislation, and the lack of action on the Manning
Report.
• Closing Panel Discussion with Guest Moderator – Featuring
David Parker (Take Back Alberta), Nadine Wellwood (1905 Committee),
Marco van Huigenbos (Former Fort Macleod town councillor), Peter
Weichler (UCP Board Director), and Marty Belanger (Marty Up North). This
panel will discuss how Albertans can resist overreach and ensure a
freer future.
The Lavigne Show will be livestreaming the entire event, so even if you can’t attend in person, you won’t miss a moment of this vital conversation.
Tickets are available for only $25. Don’t miss this opportunity to be informed, engaged, and empowered in the fight to protect Alberta’s freedoms. Join us and be part of the movement for accountability!
Support independent journalism by becoming a member of @TheLavigneShow
https://edmontonjournal.com/
Vaccine-skeptic former Alberta doctor loses bid to appeal contempt order
Dr. Viliam Makis has made a number of unfounded allegations about the impact of COVID-19 vaccines
Author of the article:
Matthew Black Published Oct 15, 2024
Prepared syringes of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Photo by Jack Boland /Postmedia, fileThe Court of Appeal of Alberta has denied an outspoken former Alberta physician the chance to appeal a court order from earlier this year that found him in contempt.
Viliam Makis was seeking to appeal the order, which sealed certain confidential information and directed him to destroy other confidential medical information in his and his corporation’s possession.
Trending
Article content
In a ruling published Tuesday, Justice Frans Slatter ruled Makis’ appeal was without merit and imposed more than $5,600 in court costs on Makis to be paid to Alberta Health Services and the College of Physicians and Surgeons.
Makis had called the costs “threats,” “extortion” and “conspiracy,” the ruling reads, which also notes he had accused Alberta Health Services and the college, along with their lawyers and a dozen judges, of engaging in criminal conduct.
“These arguments are frivolous. There is nothing unlawful about pursuing steps in civil litigation,” Slatter’s ruling states.
Slatter concurred with an earlier ruling that found Makis to be in contempt for violating an order preventing him from filing or attempting to file complaints with any police service without prior permission.
“No arguable error has been shown that would justify an appeal.”
Makis was a nuclear medicine physician at the Cross Cancer Institute until October 2016. His employment was terminated after complaints of professional misconduct, including an incident where he was accused of confronting a colleague — accusing her of lying to a college investigator and threatening her.
His medical services agreement was not renewed, and the college subsequently cancelled his practice permit in 2019.
Makis later sued AHS for wrongful dismissal, but his case was dismissed and he was declared by the court to be a vexatious litigant.
Makis has since made unsubstantiated accusations of pedophiles and child sex traffickers working within the health-care system, falsely claimed that the COVID-19 vaccine killed 80 doctors, and accused without merit medical professionals of covering up sudden deaths caused by the same vaccine.
More recently, he was also among the speakers at the anti-vaccine Injection of Truth town hall put on by Calgary-Lougheed UCP MLA Eric Bouchard in June and has also co-authored a paper positing that the anti-parasitic drug Ivermectin can treat cancer.
MAKIS v ALBERTA HEALTH SERVICES , 2023 ABCA 214
PENTELECHUK JA
14.5: Appeals only with permission
Case Summary
The Appellant, Dr. Makis, was a practicing doctor who was terminated after professional complaints were made against him. In turn, he sued the Respondent, Alberta Health Services (“AHS”), for wrongful termination and other physicians for a number of torts related to the complaints. He also alleged a wide-ranging criminal conspiracy involving the Respondents, legal counsel, and the judiciary.
Dr. Makis unsuccessfully applied to have the Respondents declared vexatious litigants. The Respondents successfully applied to strike or summarily dismiss Dr. Makis’ Actions. Dr. Makis was also found to be a vexatious litigant. As a result of that Order, Dr. Makis was required to obtain permission to Appeal the Respondents’ Applications, pursuant to Rule 14.5(1)(j).
The Court considered whether there was an important question of law or precedent, with a reasonable chance of success, and which would not unduly hinder the progress of the Action or cause undue prejudice.
On the Application to have the Respondents declared vexatious litigants, Justice Pentelechuk found that the Appeal lacked a reasonable chance of success. In particular, the Court noted that the Respondents were Defendants in the Action and the proper remedy for unnecessary litigation by a Defendant is a Costs Award.
On the Applications to have Dr. Makis’ Actions dismissed, Justice Pentelechuk granted Dr. Makis leave to Appeal. The Court noted that Dr. Makis failed to attend the proceedings wherein the Applications to summarily dismiss his Actions were heard. However, Justice Pentelechuk stated that the Respondents were not entitled to Summary Judgment by default, and were it not for the vexatious litigant Order, Dr. Makis would be entitled to an Appeal as of right. Leave was therefore granted to Appeal. However, Security for Costs was Ordered against Dr. Makis as a condition of Appeal.
MAKIS v COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ALBERTA (COMPLAINT REVIEW COMMITTEE), 2019 ABCA 341
KHULLAR JA
14.5: Appeals only with permission
The Applicant, Dr. Viliam Makis (the “Applicant”), sought permission to Appeal a Decision of the Court of Queen’s Bench dismissing an Application for Judicial Review of the decision of the Complaint Review Committee of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta (the “College”).The Applicant had filed two complaints with the College pursuant to the Health Professions Act, RSA 2000, c H-7, alleging harassment, abuse, and career sabotage (the “Complaints”). The Complaints Director determined there was insufficient evidence of unprofessional conduct and dismissed the Complaints.
On Application for Judicial Review, the Chambers Judge determined that the Applicant did not have standing to challenge the reasonableness of the Complaint Review Committee’s decision. Further, the Chambers Justice determined that the Applicant was bound by jurisprudence which held that a person who complains to a professional regulatory body has the same interest as any member of the public.
On Appeal, the College did not oppose the Application for permission to Appeal, but did submit that the Applicant’s right to Appeal should be limited to issues of procedural fairness. Khullar J.A. reviewed Rule 14.5 pertaining to permission to Appeal and noted that the test for permission to Appeal may manifest itself differently depending on the subject matter of the Appeal and the overall context of the Appeal. Her Ladyship emphasized that, fundamentally, if the Court is convinced the Appeal has no chance of success, permission to Appeal should not be granted.
Justice Khullar reviewed each of the Applicant’s arguments and found that there was no reasonable chance of success in any of the arguments save for the ones grounded in procedural fairness. Noting that the College’s position on this issue and the relatively low threshold for an arguable case on this basis, Justice Khullar granted the Applicant permission to Appeal limited to the question of procedural fairness.
Calgary lawyer sues Alberta Law Society for professional independence from DIE agenda
Roger Song sues Alberta Law Society for professional independence from DIE agenda
Courtesy Song-Howard Law Office
Jen Hodgson
Published on:
21 Nov 2023, 3:33 pm
Calgary lawyer Roger Song, who has filed a public-interest lawsuit against the Alberta Law Society to defend the profession’s independence from “cultural competence” objectives, draws parallels in the situation to Mao Zedong's China.
Re-education initiatives by the Law Society include Cultural Competence DIE (Diversity Inclusion Equity) and Truth and Reconciliation, with the former focusing on “how systemic inequalities and barriers affect individuals and groups.”
“I was shocked that in order to practice law in Canada I was, just as in China, being compelled to submit to re-education in matters of law, history, politics, society, economics, morality, spirituality and culture,” Song said.
“I found myself captured in the jaws from which I had escaped.”
Song was born in China just before the 1966 Cultural Revolution. Later he taught international law at Peking University, where his students participated in the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989. He immigrated to Alberta in 2000 and began practicing law here in 2014.
Supported by the Council of Alberta Lawyers (CAL,) Song and his lawyer Glenn Blackett filed suit on October 7.
It alleges the law society, established to ensure the public has “access to loyal and competent legal counsel,” has violated the rule of law by assuming a political objective with a prejudice against core Canadian constitutional principles.
There are “two major parts to it,” Blackett told the Western Standard. “One is professional independence. And the other is freedom of conscience.”
He explained professional independence is “a recognized principle in common law jurisdictions that lawyers have a primary duty of loyalty to their clients.”
“And things which interfere with that duty of loyalty are to be avoided, if at all possible,” he said, expanding there are reasonable limits to because some things do “appropriately interfere,” such as the obligation to comply with the law.
“But one of the most significant risks to a lawyer's independence would be to interfere with a lawyer politically,” Blackett said. “To politically interfere with the lawyer so that you try to influence a lawyer to comply with political requests.”
The new cultural conditioning guidance the law society gives its lawyers is "framed fairly broadly,” he said, offering the example of anti-racism.
“The question then becomes, what’s that? If you know your woke ideology, you know that this is a person who is an adherent to critical race theory and believes that you must pursue equity through the dismantling of systemic discrimination.”
A lawyer now has to "adapt [their] communication for enumerated groups," Blackett explained to the Western Standard. "Like how to be culturally competent when [dealing] with Indigenous people."
The new rules mean operating under the assumption the group is “intergenerationally traumatized," he said. Certain “terms are used” and “it's not exactly clear necessarily what those terms mean.”
The Alberta Law Society now wants lawyers like Song and Blackett to implement "inclusive" practices at their office, which probably means things like "asking them about their white privilege when they come in for a job interview."
"When you really employ inclusive hiring, retention, and promotion practices, that seems to mean that you should hire on a quota basis looking at, for example, people's skin color...but it may mean that you hire, retain, and promote people who are ideologically compliant."
The lawsuit argues the law society’s move to require professionals to undergo social re-education training violates Canada’s constitutional principles of parliamentary sovereignty, democracy (including freedom of conscience and expression.) constitutionalism and the rule of law, recognition of the inherent and equal dignity of each individual, personal freedom and respect for minorities (including religious minorities,) and reason (including objectivity and science.)
Song’s lawsuit further alleges the objectives violate “freedoms of religion, conscience, and expression guaranteed under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms” for professionals, including Song, who believe “that God, and not political ideology, is the supreme source of universal truth and morality.”
Those who uphold this truth believe “people have inherent individual dignity and worth, and that people are essentially the same, regardless of race.”
“My whole life I had been indoctrinated into socialist ideology,” Song said. “It made me a follower of the CCP. But the freedom of conscience I enjoyed in Canada led me to the greatest gift of my life. In 2004 I became a follower of Jesus Christ.”
Song, whose father Xin Ziling wrote books exposing Mao’s Great Leap Forward after serving as a veteran member of the CCP and PLA (People’s Liberation Army), believes politically driven ideology like critical race theory, gender theory, and post-colonialism are “hostile to liberal democracy.”
Blackett pointed out that the federal and provincial legislation governing the judiciary specify a “growing requirement on judges to become educated.”
“Judicial education requirements on judges is now in statute,” he told the Western Standard. “Before a judge can be appointed to the bench they have to complete, or undertake to complete, continuing education related to sexual assault law and social context,” which includes “systemic racism and systemic discrimination.”
"And systemic discrimination is, so far as I understand it, just a loaded word meaning the opposite of equity," he said. ". But you don't really know what kind of education judges are getting, because that's behind closed doors. It isn't public information, per se, even though it would be [paid for by] tax dollars.”
“But nonetheless, it's my law society telling me what I need to do in order to be safe, effective and sustainable.”
Blackett said Song is concerned of the term "entryism," applying to Canada as it does in China, where "you have you have the people and the enemy of the people."
"The people are peasant labourers toiling in the fields," he said. "But if you're a peasant, who says, 'I don't like communism, you've just become the enemy of the state."
“He lived in China, he knows that, basically, you can have all the laws you want. But if you have a political objective floating over the law, that political objective is going to just dissolve the law.”
“There might as well be no laws, ‘just the party line.’”
In China the constitution “says you have free speech, but you don't, because the party line is the more important objective to consider when you're applying the ‘law.’
“So he came to Canada and he sees the same. He sees the same corrosive political objective now being forced on him through his law society. So one of his interests is, I would say, saving Canada from the fate that befell China.”
https://www.youtube.com/
Peter R. Mac Isaac & Paul Westhaver - Accountability in Nova Scotia
Oct 30, 2024
The Lavigne Show Podcast In this episode, Peter R. Mac Isaac @PeterRMacIsaac and Paul Westhaver discuss Nova Scotia’s latest political shifts and government officials' growing demand for accountability. The conversation covers the recent snap election announcement, transparency issues, and the independent movement gaining traction throughout the province. Hosted by Corey Morgan, this discussion gives an in-depth look at how citizens can stand up to political gamesmanship.
Introduction by Cory Morgan Cory @CoryBMorgan discusses recent political developments, including Alberta’s leadership review and a surprise provincial election in Nova Scotia. He highlights the importance of citizen engagement and accountability in both provinces.
FOIPOP Strategies and Transparency – Paul Westhaver
Known
as the “FOIPOP King,” Paul Westhaver shares his experience filing
Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy (FOIPOP) requests to
uncover critical government documents. He explains the challenges of
navigating bureaucracy, costs, and strategies needed to obtain
transparency in Nova Scotia’s healthcare and COVID-19 policy decisions.
Organizing for Accountability in Nova Scotia – Peter R. Mac Isaac
Peter
Mac Isaac discusses his role in mobilizing citizens to demand
government accountability. He discusses working alongside Paul and
others to coordinate efforts across the province. Together, they focus
on uniting independent candidates and holding politicians to their
promises.
Premier Tim Houston’s Snap Election & Broken Legislation
Peter
and Paul delve into the sudden snap election called by Premier Tim
Houston. Despite legislation promising no election until later, Houston
bypassed it, sparking questions about the government’s accountability
and commitment to its laws. They analyze Houston’s maneuver and its
potential repercussions.
Independent Movement in Nova Scotia
Peter
shares insights into the Independent Nova Scotia Initiative, which aims
to bring more nonpartisan, community-rooted representatives into
office. The initiative aims to reduce reliance on major parties by
rallying voters and empowering locals to prioritize their communities
over party agendas.
Future of Nova Scotia’s Political Landscape
The
episode concludes with a look at the broader implications for Nova
Scotia’s political scene. Peter and Paul discuss their vision of an
accountable government where local voices are heard and respected.
This
conversation is essential for anyone interested in government
accountability, transparency, and the potential of independent movements
in Canadian politics.
Like, share, and consider becoming a member of TheLavigneShow.com to help support important conversations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Jeremy MacKenzie - Government Surveillance & Public Accountability
Oct 31, 2024
In
this Halloween special, Jeremy MacKenzie @JeremyMacKenzi joins the
conversation to discuss surveillance, government overreach, and the cost
of speaking out in Canada. As a public figure often scrutinized by
authorities, Jeremy shares his experiences dealing with intense
government monitoring, media narratives, and the personal challenges
faced by those who challenge the status quo. The discussion also
explores the impact of censorship on public discourse and the challenges
of maintaining transparency in the face of systemic resistance.
Legal and Social Consequences
Jeremy
recounts his journey from being labelled in the media to dealing with
intense government oversight, including intelligence agencies monitoring
his actions. He speaks on the strain this has put on his personal life
and those around him, illustrating individuals' challenges when they
enter the public eye.
"Fed" Labels and the Dangers of Public Perception
Jeremy
addresses the recurring "fed" label—being accused of acting as a
government informant—and the dangers associated with this narrative. He
explains how these accusations can isolate individuals within their
communities, intensify risks, and create mistrust among peers, making it
more challenging to advocate for change.
Nova Scotia Election & Premier Tim Houston’s Connection
The
conversation turns to the recent Nova Scotia election announcement,
where Premier Tim Houston’s actions may connect to Jeremy’s prior
criminal trial. Jeremy discusses the implications of Houston’s possible
influence, raising questions about fairness in the legal process when
political figures are involved and how these ties illustrate broader
issues of power and influence within Canadian politics.
Tour Across Canada:
Meeting
Fans and Exploring Canadian Communities
Jeremy recounts his journey across Canada, where he met supporters,
shared insights, and explored the nation’s diverse landscapes. He
encourages Canadians to travel within their own country, meet their
fellow citizens, and experience firsthand the true spirit of Canada.
Canadian Election Cycle
Jason
delves into upcoming election cycles and the potential for political
change. They discuss how elections impact public accountability and the
mechanisms through which citizens can push for transparency and reform.
Public Surveillance and the Role of Media
Jeremy
and Jason discuss the media’s role in amplifying government narratives
and stigmatizing dissenting voices. They explore how surveillance
affects community members, including friends and supporters, and the
broader implications for freedom of expression in Canada.
Like, share, and consider becoming a member of TheLavigneShow.com to help support important conversations.
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 3:53 PM
Subject: RE: A little Deju Vu for the very sneaky lawyer James Kitchen and his biblepounding buddies
To: <james@jsmklaw.ca>, <info@ezrainstitute.ca>, <info@libertycoalitioncanada.
Cc: <info@votefaytene.ca>, rob.moore <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 3:53 PM
Subject: RE: A little Deju Vu for the very sneaky lawyer James Kitchen and his biblepounding buddies
To: <james@jsmklaw.ca>, <info@ezrainstitute.ca>, <info@libertycoalitioncanada.
Cc: <info@votefaytene.ca>, rob.moore <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>
Friday 5 November 2021
Methinks Higgy et al know why I love the circus N'esy Pas?
--------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2021 23:16:51 +0000
Subject: RE: A little Deju Vu for the very sneaky lawyer James Kitchen
and his biblepounding buddies
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.
If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.
Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.
Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
pour examen et considération.
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144 or by email
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
Brunswick E3B 5H1 Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Justice Minister <JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2021 23:13:24 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: A little Deju Vu for the very sneaky lawyer
James Kitchen and his biblepounding buddies
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email to the Minister of Justice. Please be assured
that it has been received by the Department. Your email will be
reviewed and addressed accordingly. Thank you.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "James S. M. Kitchen" <james@jsmklaw.ca>
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2021 23:13:21 +0000
Subject: Auto: A little Deju Vu for the very sneaky lawyer James
Kitchen and his biblepounding buddies
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
If you are a potential client contacting me to engage my services and
you do not already have an initial consultation scheduled, I am not
able to take on any new clients or cases until after November 22,
2021. You have my sincere apologies.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2021 20:13:14 -0300
Subject: A little Deju Vu for the very sneaky lawyer James Kitchen and
his biblepounding buddies
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
< JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>,
"theangryalbertan@protonmail.
"howard.anglin@gmail.com" <howard.anglin@gmail.com>,
"fin.minfinance-financemin.
< fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@
< Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
dereckstorie85@gmail.com, balfour@derbarristers.com,
ian@mccuaiglaw.ca, cps <cps@calgarypolice.ca>, proyal@royallaw.ca,
ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, "Michelle.Boutin"
< Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
info@newblueontario.com, neilclementslaw@gmail.com,
Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Marci.Surkes@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
John.Brodhead@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, mcu
< mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Ian.Shugart" <Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>,
sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, "premier@gov.ab.ca"
< premier@gov.ab.ca>, "gertjan@shaw.ca" <gertjan@shaw.ca>,
"blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca"
< David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, Norman Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>,
"Kevin.leahy" <Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: office@albertachiro.com, info@libertycoalitioncanada.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 17:40:26 +0000
Subject: RE: Legions of cops, politicians, lawyers such as David
Freiheit and James Kitchen and their many media buddies understand my
words just as I understand theirs N'esy Pas? Michelle Boutin
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.
If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.
Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.
Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
pour examen et considération.
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144 or by email
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: New Blue Party of Ontario <info@newblueontario.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 10:38:37 -0700
Subject: Re: Legions of cops, politicians, lawyers such as David
Freiheit and James Kitchen and their many media buddies understand my
words just as I understand theirs N'esy Pas? Michelle Boutin
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Just a quick note to thank you for reaching out.
To donate to the New Blue Party of Ontario and receive a generous
political tax credit, please visit www.newblueontario.com/donate ...
Donations are received by the New Blue Ontario Fund.
In the coming days we will be releasing our membership program where
you can join the New Blue Party and be part of building the party from
the ground up.
Due to the increased volume of emails we have been receiving with
interest in the New Blue Party of Ontario, it has taken us longer than
we'd like to respond.
We can assure you that every email we receive is read.
Thank you for your patience and your support!
New Blue Party of Ontario Team
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 20:19:10 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Legions of cops, politicians, lawyers such as David
Freiheit and James Kitchen and their many media buddies understand my
words just as I understand theirs N'esy Pas? Michelle Boutin
To: kkowalchuk@getzcollins.com, doris@reimerllp.com,
lani@rouillardlaw.ca, spiritualelders@hotmail.com, ministryofjustice
< ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, info@lawyers4truth.ca
https://www.bitchute.com/
Lawyers 4 Truth
First published at 01:34 UTC on August 26th, 2021.
Laura Lynn Tyler Thompson
8499 subscribers
James Kitchen and Katherine Kowalchuk, 2 lawyers will join us to talk
about the upcoming boycott school rally and plans to take the Alberta
Health Services to court over the destruction of small businesses.
Show Resources: https://bit.ly/3sKvOMc
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Justice Minister <JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2021 23:13:24 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: A little Deju Vu for the very sneaky lawyer
James Kitchen and his biblepounding buddies
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email to the Minister of Justice. Please be assured
that it has been received by the Department. Your email will be
reviewed and addressed accordingly. Thank you.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "James S. M. Kitchen" <james@jsmklaw.ca>
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2021 23:13:21 +0000
Subject: Auto: A little Deju Vu for the very sneaky lawyer James
Kitchen and his biblepounding buddies
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
If you are a potential client contacting me to engage my services and
you do not already have an initial consultation scheduled, I am not
able to take on any new clients or cases until after November 22,
2021. You have my sincere apologies.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2021 20:13:14 -0300
Subject: A little Deju Vu for the very sneaky lawyer James Kitchen and
his biblepounding buddies
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
< JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>,
"theangryalbertan@protonmail.
"howard.anglin@gmail.com" <howard.anglin@gmail.com>,
"fin.minfinance-financemin.
< fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@
< Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
dereckstorie85@gmail.com, balfour@derbarristers.com,
ian@mccuaiglaw.ca, cps <cps@calgarypolice.ca>, proyal@royallaw.ca,
ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, "Michelle.Boutin"
< Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
info@newblueontario.com, neilclementslaw@gmail.com,
Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Marci.Surkes@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
John.Brodhead@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, mcu
< mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Ian.Shugart" <Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>,
sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, "premier@gov.ab.ca"
< premier@gov.ab.ca>, "gertjan@shaw.ca" <gertjan@shaw.ca>,
"blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca"
< David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, Norman Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>,
"Kevin.leahy" <Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: office@albertachiro.com, info@libertycoalitioncanada.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 17:40:26 +0000
Subject: RE: Legions of cops, politicians, lawyers such as David
Freiheit and James Kitchen and their many media buddies understand my
words just as I understand theirs N'esy Pas? Michelle Boutin
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.
If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.
Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.
Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
pour examen et considération.
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144 or by email
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: New Blue Party of Ontario <info@newblueontario.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 10:38:37 -0700
Subject: Re: Legions of cops, politicians, lawyers such as David
Freiheit and James Kitchen and their many media buddies understand my
words just as I understand theirs N'esy Pas? Michelle Boutin
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Just a quick note to thank you for reaching out.
To donate to the New Blue Party of Ontario and receive a generous
political tax credit, please visit www.newblueontario.com/donate ...
Donations are received by the New Blue Ontario Fund.
In the coming days we will be releasing our membership program where
you can join the New Blue Party and be part of building the party from
the ground up.
Due to the increased volume of emails we have been receiving with
interest in the New Blue Party of Ontario, it has taken us longer than
we'd like to respond.
We can assure you that every email we receive is read.
Thank you for your patience and your support!
New Blue Party of Ontario Team
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 20:19:10 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Legions of cops, politicians, lawyers such as David
Freiheit and James Kitchen and their many media buddies understand my
words just as I understand theirs N'esy Pas? Michelle Boutin
To: kkowalchuk@getzcollins.com, doris@reimerllp.com,
lani@rouillardlaw.ca, spiritualelders@hotmail.com, ministryofjustice
< ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, info@lawyers4truth.ca
https://www.bitchute.com/
Lawyers 4 Truth
First published at 01:34 UTC on August 26th, 2021.
Laura Lynn Tyler Thompson
8499 subscribers
James Kitchen and Katherine Kowalchuk, 2 lawyers will join us to talk
about the upcoming boycott school rally and plans to take the Alberta
Health Services to court over the destruction of small businesses.
Show Resources: https://bit.ly/3sKvOMc
>>>> ---- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "McKnight, Gisele" McKnight.Gisele@kingscorecord.
>>>> To: lcampenella@ledger.com
>>>> Cc:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:53 PM
>>>> Subject: David Amos
>>>>
>>>> Hello Lisa,
>>>>
>>>> David Amos asked me to contact you. I met him last June after he became
>>>> an independent (not representing any political party) candidate in our
>>>> federal
>>>> election that was held June 28. He was a candidate in our constituency
>>>> of
>>>> Fundy (now called Fundy-Royal).
>>>>
>>>> I wrote a profile story about him, as I did all other candidates. That
>>>> story appeared in the Kings County Record June 22. A second story,
>>>> written
>>>> by one of my reporters, appeared on the same date, which was a report
>>>> on
>>>> the candidates' debate held June 18.
>>>>
>>>> As I recall David Amos came last of four candidates in the election.
>>>> The winner got 14,997 votes, while Amos got 358.
>>>>
>>>> I have attached the two stories that appeared, as well as a photo
>>>> taken by reporter Erin Hatfield during the debate. I couldn't find the
>>>> photo
>>>> that ran, but this one is very similar.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A1-debate A1-amos,David for MP 24.doc debate 2.JPG
>>>>
>>>> Gisele McKnight editor
>>>> Kings County Record
>>>> Sussex, New Brunswick
>>>> Canada
>>>> 506-433-1070
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd
>>>>
>>>> By Erin Hatfield
>>>>
>>>> "If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
>>>> world is all screwed up, rearrange it."
>>>>
>>>> The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
>>>> the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
>>>> watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
>>>> unofficial, theme song for the debate.
>>>>
>>>> The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
>>>> they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
>>>> Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
>>>> chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
>>>> left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
>>>> mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
>>>> the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.
>>>>
>>>> The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was
>>>> organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage
>>>> of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record
>>>> and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.
>>>>
>>>> Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
>>>> responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
>>>> exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
>>>> Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
>>>> other on their answers and criticizing eachothers' party leaders.
>>>> Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
>>>> questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic
>>>> relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
>>>> response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's
>>>> getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."
>>>>
>>>> Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his
>>>> party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but
>>>> well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am
>>>> on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better
>>>> places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters
>>>> shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.
>>>>
>>>> The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At
>>>> one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in
>>>> front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the
>>>> voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According to
>>>> Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and second
>>>> readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted, at
>>>> final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to
>>>> register sex offenders rather than register the property of law
>>>> abiding citizens."
>>>>
>>>> The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and
>>>> women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman
>>>> yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron
>>>> spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.
>>>>
>>>> Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy
>>>> Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You're out of touch," Armstrong
>>>> yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of
>>>> post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged
>>>> Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time,
>>>> anyplace," Armstrong responded.
>>>>
>>>> As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate,
>>>> candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and
>>>> fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making
>>>> process for the June 28 vote.
>>>>
>>>> Cutline – David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his
>>>> favourite possessions—motorcycles.
>>>>
>>>> McKnight/KCR
>>>>
>>>> The Unconventional Candidate
>>>>
>>>> David Amos Isn't Campaigning For Your Vote, But….
>>>>
>>>> By Gisele McKnight
>>>>
>>>> FUNDY—He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
>>>> wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
>>>> that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."
>>>>
>>>> Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot—David Amos.
>>>>
>>>> The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife
>>>> and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from
>>>> running for office in Canada.
>>>>
>>>> One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail
>>>> to meet Elections Canada requirements.
>>>>
>>>> When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his
>>>> favourite place to do so—Fundy.
>>>>
>>>> Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his
>>>> dissatisfaction with politicians.
>>>>
>>>> "I've become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he
>>>> said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."
>>>>
>>>> The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in
>>>> 1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he
>>>> needed to change his life.
>>>>
>>>> "I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that
>>>> sometimes in midlife."
>>>>
>>>> So Amos, who'd lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners
>>>> motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952
>>>> Panhead motorcycle.
>>>>
>>>> "Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact)
>>>> experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you
>>>> renew your faith in mankind – you help anyone you can, you never ask
>>>> for anything, but you take what they offer."
>>>>
>>>> For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs
>>>> and conversation all over North America.
>>>>
>>>> Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son
>>>> and a daughter and become a house-husband – Mr. Mom, as he calls
>>>> himself.
>>>>
>>>> He also describes himself in far more colourful terms—a motorcyclist
>>>> rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed
>>>> individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud
>>>> Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."
>>>>
>>>> Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his
>>>> life.
>>>>
>>>> "But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said.
>>>> "It's alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"
>>>>
>>>> Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.
>>>>
>>>> "I didn't appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door
>>>> interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can
>>>> call me. I'm not going to drive my opinions down their throats."
>>>>
>>>> And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.
>>>>
>>>> "I won't take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It's
>>>> not about money. It goes against what I'm fighting about."
>>>>
>>>> What he's fighting for is the discussion of issues – tainted blood,
>>>> the exploitation of the Maritimes' gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
>>>> name a few.
>>>>
>>>> "The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs – fishing,
>>>> farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I'm
>>>> death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
>>>> (NAFTA) out the window.
>>>>
>>>> NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
>>>> easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.
>>>>
>>>> Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.
>>>>
>>>> "There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
>>>> especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
>>>> Don't necessarily vote for me, but vote."
>>>>
>>>> Although…if you're going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have
>>>> your X by his name.
>>>>
>>>> "I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and
>>>> say, 'what the hell.'"
>>>> From: "McKnight, Gisele" McKnight.Gisele@kingscorecord.
>>>> To: lcampenella@ledger.com
>>>> Cc:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:53 PM
>>>> Subject: David Amos
>>>>
>>>> Hello Lisa,
>>>>
>>>> David Amos asked me to contact you. I met him last June after he became
>>>> an independent (not representing any political party) candidate in our
>>>> federal
>>>> election that was held June 28. He was a candidate in our constituency
>>>> of
>>>> Fundy (now called Fundy-Royal).
>>>>
>>>> I wrote a profile story about him, as I did all other candidates. That
>>>> story appeared in the Kings County Record June 22. A second story,
>>>> written
>>>> by one of my reporters, appeared on the same date, which was a report
>>>> on
>>>> the candidates' debate held June 18.
>>>>
>>>> As I recall David Amos came last of four candidates in the election.
>>>> The winner got 14,997 votes, while Amos got 358.
>>>>
>>>> I have attached the two stories that appeared, as well as a photo
>>>> taken by reporter Erin Hatfield during the debate. I couldn't find the
>>>> photo
>>>> that ran, but this one is very similar.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A1-debate A1-amos,David for MP 24.doc debate 2.JPG
>>>>
>>>> Gisele McKnight editor
>>>> Kings County Record
>>>> Sussex, New Brunswick
>>>> Canada
>>>> 506-433-1070
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd
>>>>
>>>> By Erin Hatfield
>>>>
>>>> "If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
>>>> world is all screwed up, rearrange it."
>>>>
>>>> The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
>>>> the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
>>>> watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
>>>> unofficial, theme song for the debate.
>>>>
>>>> The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
>>>> they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
>>>> Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
>>>> chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
>>>> left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
>>>> mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
>>>> the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.
>>>>
>>>> The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was
>>>> organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage
>>>> of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record
>>>> and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.
>>>>
>>>> Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
>>>> responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
>>>> exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
>>>> Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
>>>> other on their answers and criticizing eachothers' party leaders.
>>>> Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
>>>> questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic
>>>> relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
>>>> response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's
>>>> getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."
>>>>
>>>> Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his
>>>> party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but
>>>> well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am
>>>> on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better
>>>> places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters
>>>> shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.
>>>>
>>>> The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At
>>>> one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in
>>>> front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the
>>>> voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According to
>>>> Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and second
>>>> readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted, at
>>>> final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to
>>>> register sex offenders rather than register the property of law
>>>> abiding citizens."
>>>>
>>>> The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and
>>>> women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman
>>>> yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron
>>>> spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.
>>>>
>>>> Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy
>>>> Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You're out of touch," Armstrong
>>>> yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of
>>>> post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged
>>>> Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time,
>>>> anyplace," Armstrong responded.
>>>>
>>>> As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate,
>>>> candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and
>>>> fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making
>>>> process for the June 28 vote.
>>>>
>>>> Cutline – David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his
>>>> favourite possessions—motorcycles.
>>>>
>>>> McKnight/KCR
>>>>
>>>> The Unconventional Candidate
>>>>
>>>> David Amos Isn't Campaigning For Your Vote, But….
>>>>
>>>> By Gisele McKnight
>>>>
>>>> FUNDY—He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
>>>> wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
>>>> that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."
>>>>
>>>> Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot—David Amos.
>>>>
>>>> The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife
>>>> and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from
>>>> running for office in Canada.
>>>>
>>>> One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail
>>>> to meet Elections Canada requirements.
>>>>
>>>> When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his
>>>> favourite place to do so—Fundy.
>>>>
>>>> Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his
>>>> dissatisfaction with politicians.
>>>>
>>>> "I've become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he
>>>> said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."
>>>>
>>>> The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in
>>>> 1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he
>>>> needed to change his life.
>>>>
>>>> "I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that
>>>> sometimes in midlife."
>>>>
>>>> So Amos, who'd lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners
>>>> motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952
>>>> Panhead motorcycle.
>>>>
>>>> "Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact)
>>>> experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you
>>>> renew your faith in mankind – you help anyone you can, you never ask
>>>> for anything, but you take what they offer."
>>>>
>>>> For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs
>>>> and conversation all over North America.
>>>>
>>>> Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son
>>>> and a daughter and become a house-husband – Mr. Mom, as he calls
>>>> himself.
>>>>
>>>> He also describes himself in far more colourful terms—a motorcyclist
>>>> rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed
>>>> individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud
>>>> Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."
>>>>
>>>> Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his
>>>> life.
>>>>
>>>> "But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said.
>>>> "It's alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"
>>>>
>>>> Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.
>>>>
>>>> "I didn't appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door
>>>> interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can
>>>> call me. I'm not going to drive my opinions down their throats."
>>>>
>>>> And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.
>>>>
>>>> "I won't take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It's
>>>> not about money. It goes against what I'm fighting about."
>>>>
>>>> What he's fighting for is the discussion of issues – tainted blood,
>>>> the exploitation of the Maritimes' gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
>>>> name a few.
>>>>
>>>> "The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs – fishing,
>>>> farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I'm
>>>> death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
>>>> (NAFTA) out the window.
>>>>
>>>> NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
>>>> easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.
>>>>
>>>> Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.
>>>>
>>>> "There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
>>>> especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
>>>> Don't necessarily vote for me, but vote."
>>>>
>>>> Although…if you're going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have
>>>> your X by his name.
>>>>
>>>> "I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and
>>>> say, 'what the hell.'"
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Fraser, David" <david.fraser@mcinnescooper.
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 15:53:41 +0000
Subject: Your call
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
David,
could you please explain what you were getting at in your call just
now? I was in the middle of something else, wasn't able to understand
it all and then the line just cut out.
Thanks,
d.
Notice This communication, including any attachments, is confidential
and may be protected by solicitor/client privilege. It is intended
only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by e-mail or
telephone at McInnes Cooper's expense. Avis Les informations contenues
dans ce courriel, y compris toute(s) pièce(s) jointe(s), sont
confidentielles et peuvent faire l'objet d'un privilège avocat-client.
Les informations sont dirigées au(x) destinataire(s) seulement. Si
vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur
par courriel ou par téléphone, aux frais de McInnes Cooper.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Kulik, John" <john.kulik@mcinnescooper.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 17:37:49 +0000
Subject: McInnes Cooper
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
"david.raymond.amos@gmail.com" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Dear Mr. Amos:
I am General Counsel for McInnes Cooper. If you need to communicate
with our firm, please do so through me.
Thank you.
John Kulik
[McInnes Cooper]<http://www.
John Kulik Q.C.
Partner & General Counsel
McInnes Cooper
tel +1 (902) 444 8571 | fax +1 (902) 425 6350
1969 Upper Water Street
Suite 1300
Purdy's Wharf Tower II Halifax, NS, B3J 2V1
asst Cathy Ohlhausen | +1 (902) 455 8215
Notice This communication, including any attachments, is confidential
and may be protected by solicitor/client privilege. It is intended
only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by e-mail or
telephone at McInnes Cooper's expense. Avis Les informations contenues
dans ce courriel, y compris toute(s) pièce(s) jointe(s), sont
confidentielles et peuvent faire l'objet d'un privilège avocat-client.
Les informations sont dirigées au(x) destinataire(s) seulement. Si
vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur
par courriel ou par téléphone, aux frais de McInnes Cooper.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
To: coi@gnb.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Good Day Sir
After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
to speak to one of your staff for the first time
Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
suggested that you study closely.
This is the docket in Federal Court
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
April 3rd, 2017
https://archive.org/details/
This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
The only hearing thus far
May 24th, 2017
https://archive.org/details/
This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
Date: 20151223
Docket: T-1557-15
Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Plaintiff
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant
ORDER
(Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
December 14, 2015)
The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
in its entirety.
At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
(now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
he stated:
As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
You are your brother’s keeper.
Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
Police.
In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
[1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
is no order as to costs.
“B. Richard Bell”
Judge
Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
"FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
http://davidraymondamos3.
83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
five years after he began his bragging:
January 13, 2015
This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
December 8, 2014
Why Canada Stood Tall!
Friday, October 3, 2014
Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
Stupid Justin Trudeau?
Vertias Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.
>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask
>> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>
From: "Fraser, David" <david.fraser@mcinnescooper.
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 15:53:41 +0000
Subject: Your call
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
David,
could you please explain what you were getting at in your call just
now? I was in the middle of something else, wasn't able to understand
it all and then the line just cut out.
Thanks,
d.
Notice This communication, including any attachments, is confidential
and may be protected by solicitor/client privilege. It is intended
only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by e-mail or
telephone at McInnes Cooper's expense. Avis Les informations contenues
dans ce courriel, y compris toute(s) pièce(s) jointe(s), sont
confidentielles et peuvent faire l'objet d'un privilège avocat-client.
Les informations sont dirigées au(x) destinataire(s) seulement. Si
vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur
par courriel ou par téléphone, aux frais de McInnes Cooper.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Kulik, John" <john.kulik@mcinnescooper.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 17:37:49 +0000
Subject: McInnes Cooper
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
"david.raymond.amos@gmail.com" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Dear Mr. Amos:
I am General Counsel for McInnes Cooper. If you need to communicate
with our firm, please do so through me.
Thank you.
John Kulik
[McInnes Cooper]<http://www.
John Kulik Q.C.
Partner & General Counsel
McInnes Cooper
tel +1 (902) 444 8571 | fax +1 (902) 425 6350
1969 Upper Water Street
Suite 1300
Purdy's Wharf Tower II Halifax, NS, B3J 2V1
asst Cathy Ohlhausen | +1 (902) 455 8215
Notice This communication, including any attachments, is confidential
and may be protected by solicitor/client privilege. It is intended
only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by e-mail or
telephone at McInnes Cooper's expense. Avis Les informations contenues
dans ce courriel, y compris toute(s) pièce(s) jointe(s), sont
confidentielles et peuvent faire l'objet d'un privilège avocat-client.
Les informations sont dirigées au(x) destinataire(s) seulement. Si
vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur
par courriel ou par téléphone, aux frais de McInnes Cooper.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
To: coi@gnb.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Good Day Sir
After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
to speak to one of your staff for the first time
Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
suggested that you study closely.
This is the docket in Federal Court
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
April 3rd, 2017
https://archive.org/details/
This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
The only hearing thus far
May 24th, 2017
https://archive.org/details/
This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
Date: 20151223
Docket: T-1557-15
Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Plaintiff
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant
ORDER
(Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
December 14, 2015)
The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
in its entirety.
At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
(now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
he stated:
As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
You are your brother’s keeper.
Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
Police.
In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
[1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
is no order as to costs.
“B. Richard Bell”
Judge
Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
"FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
http://davidraymondamos3.
83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
five years after he began his bragging:
January 13, 2015
This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
December 8, 2014
Why Canada Stood Tall!
Friday, October 3, 2014
Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
Stupid Justin Trudeau?
Vertias Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.
>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask
>> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment