From: Burgoyne, Ryan (Fredericton) <rburgoyne@coxandpalmer.com>
Date: Sun, Mar 22, 2026 at 4:58 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: FW: Where does she (really) stand?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
I am out of the office March 23, 2026, attending a hearing. If your matter is urgent, please call (506) 453-7771.
From: Moore, Rob - M.P. <Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Sun, Mar 22, 2026 at 4:58 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: FW: Where does she (really) stand?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. office. We appreciate the time you took to get in touch with our office.
If you did not already, please ensure to include your full contact details on your email and the appropriate staff will be able to action your request. We strive to ensure all constituent correspondence is responded to in a timely manner.
If your question or concern is time sensitive, please call our office: 506-832-4200.
Again, we thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts and concerns.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Office of the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P.
Member of Parliament for Fundy Royal
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Mar 22, 2026 at 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: FW: Where does she (really) stand?
To: Mitton, Megan (LEG) <megan.mitton@gnb.ca>, David.Coon <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, keith.chiasson <keith.chiasson@gnb.ca>, jacques.j.leblanc <jacques.j.leblanc@gnb.ca>, jean-claude.d'amours <jean-claude.d'amours@gnb.ca>, robert.mckee <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, robert.gauvin <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, Mark.Blakely <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, John.Williamson <John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, rob.moore <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, Bill.Oliver <Bill.Oliver@gnb.ca>, Susan.Holt <susan.holt@gnb.ca>, ltgov <LTgov@gnb.ca>, Benoit.Bourque <Benoit.Bourque@gnb.ca>, Rene.Legacy <Rene.Legacy@gnb.ca>, guy.arseneault <guy.arseneault@gnb.ca>, chuck.chiasson <chuck.chiasson@gnb.ca>, Robert. Jones <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, <michelle.conroy@gnb.ca>, <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, <Ian.Lee@legnb.ca>, <Don.Monahan@legnb.ca>, <Rob.Weir@gnb.ca>, <Kris.Austin@legnb.ca>, <Glen.Savoie@gnb.ca>, <JOHN.HERRON@gnb.ca>, <mike.dawson@parl.gc.ca>, <rmcknight@valleywaters.ca>, <cao@valleywaters.ca>, <cmcdonald@valleywaters.ca>, <aaron.kennedy@gnb.ca>
Cc: <rburgoyne@coxandpalmer.com>, <Alain.Chiasson2@gnb.ca>, <JohnFurey@fureylegal.com>, <lclark@nbpower.com>, <Dave.Young@nbeub.ca>, <gzacher@stikeman.com>, <Shelley@nbcpd.org>, <Randy@sjhdc.ca>, <crystal.critch@gnb.ca>, <len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>, <DaMurphy@nbpower.com>, <jeff.garrett@sjenergy.com>, <dg@edmundston.ca>, <dan.dionne@perth-andover.com>, <pierreroy@edmundston.ca>, <dmadsen.consulting@gmail.com>, <nrubin@stewartmckelvey.com>, <JPetrie@nbpower.com>
Another Ides of March has come and gone. Methinks EUB matters are getting worse N'esy Pas?
Broad opposition to N.B. Power rate increase on display as hearings conclude
Public intervener, municipal utilities join others in opposing 4.75% hike

N.B. Power cannot reasonably expect its customers to absorb annual price increases that are well above the rate of inflation and should have its request for a 4.75 per cent increase in the coming year reduced, the New Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board was told on Friday.
During closing arguments in N.B. Power's two-week-long rate hearing, the province's three municipal utilities and the public intervener joined other parties in calling the requested increase, when added to earlier increases, too much.
"These rate increases are significantly above the rate of inflation and are putting a significant strain on N.B. Power’s customers," said Ryan Bourgoyne in his final submission.
Bourgoyne is a lawyer who represented New Brunswick's three municipal utilities at the hearing, including Saint John Energy, Edmundston Energy and the Perth-Andover Electric Light Commission.
The municipal utilities have been supportive of N.B. Power's request for higher rates in previous years, but in recent hearings have become an opponent of the pace of those changes.
"A financially healthy N.B. Power is good for all in New Brunswick," said Burgoyne.
"However, the burden of improving N.B. Power’s financial health cannot fall exclusively to ratepayers."
Ryan
Burgoyne is a lawyer representing New Brunswick's three municipal
utilities. He said N.B. Power has not done enough to control its costs
and should be denied the full increase in rates it is asking for. (YouTube)Burgoyne recommended the EUB strip up to $61 million in proposed expenses from N.B. Power's budget, a proposal that would lower the rate increase by more than half.
Public intervener Alain Chiasson made similar arguments.
"Further bill increases, if approved by this board, will cause customers harm," said Chiasson.
"N.B. Power needs to start operating as if it has a finite supply of funds. Just like any other New Brunswicker when they open their wallets or look into their bank accounts, there is not an infinite supply of money."
N.B. Power makes final case for rate increaseShelley Petit with the New Brunswick Coalition of Persons with Disabilities also called for the rate increase request to be denied.
Petit said a 4.75 per cent increase "when layered on top of years of cumulative increases" is excessive.
"The board must decline the requested increase," Petit said in her submission.
New
Brunswick public intervener Alain Chiasson said the public is in the
midst of an "affordability crisis" and asked that N.B. Power's rate
increase be lowered to less than two per cent. (Radio-Canada)N.B. Power lawyer John Furey acknowledged that a series of steep rate increases in recent years have caused hardship for some but argued the utility needs what it has asked for.
"N.B. Power comes to this hearing with an understanding that rate changes in recent years have created challenges for many of its customers," said Furey.
"But the question before the board is whether those proposed rates are reasonable."
The rates are reasonable "and necessary," argued Furey.
EUB chair Christopher Stewart asked whether there is any reading of New Brunswick legislation that governs how rates are to be set that would permit the board to deny part of a rate increase on the basis customers cannot afford it.
Furey said the effects of a rate increase on customers are not listed as a consideration the board can weigh in its deliberations anywhere that he knows of.
"Those impacts, while real under our legislative framework, are not for the board to decide," he said.
N.B. Power had asked for any rate increases awarded to take effect on April 1, but the hearing was delayed for several weeks and board has suggested any decision it makes will not affect rates before June.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Reporter
Robert Jones has been a reporter and producer with CBC New Brunswick since 1990. His investigative reports on petroleum pricing in New Brunswick won several regional and national awards and led to the adoption of price regulation in 2006.
Holt government defends N.B. Power involvement in selecting group to review N.B. Power
Utility president and board chair played role in the 'identification and selection' of candidates
N.B.
Power was given a role in choosing the three people now conducting a
'comprehensive' review of the utility. The selected group includes, from
left, Michael Bernstein, Duncan Hawthorne and Anne Bertrand. (Michael Heenan/CBC)Internal government records show senior N.B. Power officials were given a say in selecting the three-person committee set up to advise the New Brunswick government on what to do about the utility.
The selection process resulted in at least two reviewers with strong connections to N.B. Power being chosen, but New Brunswick Finance and Energy Minister René Legacy says the utility has not been unduly influencing the review exercise by its sometimes behind-the-scenes involvement.
"N.B. Power representatives provide valuable perspective but do not have veto power over any decision regarding the review," Legacy said in a statement issued to CBC News.
A request to interview the minister about the review and N.B. Power's role in choosing those conducting it was not granted.
N.B. Power had hand in picking who would independently review its operationsN.B. Power's involvement in the selection process surfaced in documents sent to New Brunswick's opposition Progressive Conservative Party following a freedom of information request.
The documents have been reviewed by CBC News.
PC Kris Austin, the opposition energy critic, said allowing the utility a say in who was picked to evaluate the utility undermines the credibility of the exercise.
N.B.
Power president Lori Clark was one of two senior officials from the
utility allowed a say in who would run an in-depth review of the Crown
corporation. (Frédéric Cammarano/Radio-Canada)"It absolutely torpedoes the thought of an independent outside committee," Austin said in an interview. "I think that kind of blows all that out of the water."
In mid-April, Legacy and New Brunswick Premier Susan Holt jointly announced what they called a "comprehensive review" of N.B. Power that would be at arms length from the company.
Holt said major changes were needed at the utility because of rapidly rising power rates and bulging debt levels and she wanted a fresh look by outside experts who could evaluate what is wrong and propose solutions.
"Transformative change is required," Holt said. "Everything is on the table because the status quo is no longer an option."
Holt also made the point that the review process needed to be "independent and transparent" to earn public trust.
A news release issued at the time said, "three people independent from N.B. Power" would be picked to lead the review but didn't detail how they would be chosen.
Documents since released by the province show that selecting the three people was delegated to a "steering committee" that was empowered to provide "strategic direction" to the project
New
Brunswick Finance and Energy Minister René Legacy says nothing about
the selection process for the review group will affect its independence.
(Ed Hunter/CBC)Five of the seven members of the steering committee represent the province, including Legacy, deputy energy minister Jeff Hoyt, the clerk of the executive council, Judy Wagner, and two senior officials from Susan Holt's office — chief of staff Katie Davey and director of communications Brit Mockler.
The remaining two members are N.B. Power president Lori Clark and N.B. Power chair Andrew MacGillivray.
In the days after the review was announced the steering committee assembled to choose the three people who would run it.
From a number of candidates whose names are redacted in the documents, the committee settled on former N.B. Power board member Anne Bertrand, utility financial expert Michael Bernstein and former Ontario utility and nuclear executive Duncan Hawthorne.
Bertrand, a former New Brunswick Information and Privacy Commissioner, was a member of N.B. Power's board of directors between 2018 and 2024, serving alongside MacGillivray.
According to various N.B. Power annual reports, Bertrand sat on a number of board committees with the now chair and was a member of the board in 2023 when it named Lori Clark to become N.B. Power president
Bernstein was also a familiar figure to the utility.
Opposition
energy critic Kris Austin says allowing N.B. Power a say in choosing
who would review it 'torpedoes' the effort's credibility. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)Although not detailed in the online biography the province initially released about him, Bernstein was involved as a consultant in the effort to sell N.B. Power to Hydro Quebec in 2009.
More recently, he had been on a financial retainer to N.B. Power to advise it on what might be done with the troubled Point Lepreau nuclear generating station and the structurally challenged Mactaquac hydroelectric dam.
In an interview, Bernstein said he terminated his financial relationship with N.B. Power in the spring before he formally signed on to help conduct the review of N.B. Power.
"Once it was in early May, saying, 'Look, we'd like to move forward with you,' then I had the conversation with the company about terminating my agreement," Bernstein said.
In his statement to CBC News, Legacy acknowledged both Lori Clark and Andrew MacGillivray were involved in "the identification and selection" of Bertrand, Bernstein and Hawthorne to lead the review but insisted nothing the steering committee has done or will do affects the group's ability to evaluate N.B. Power "independently and objectively."
He also said Bernstein's biography on the N.B. Power review website is being updated to include information about his past involvement with the utility "to ensure full transparency."
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Reporter
Robert Jones has been a reporter and producer with CBC New Brunswick since 1990. His investigative reports on petroleum pricing in New Brunswick won several regional and national awards and led to the adoption of price regulation in 2006.
Minimal public interest in comprehensive N.B. Power review has 'disappointed' so far
Panel studying what to do about debt-laden utility underwhelmed by public interest in its work
Michael Bernstein, left, Duncan Hawthorne and Anne Bertrand at a public meeting in Saint John on Thursday. (Roger Cosman/CBC)Public interest in a review of N.B. Power ordered by the New Brunswick government has been underwhelming so far, according to a key member of the independent group running the initiative.
Duncan Hawthorne is a former president of Bruce Power in Ontario and at a public meeting in Saint John on Thursday said participation in the group's online attempts to reach the public has been weak.
"I have been disappointed at the number of people that have joined our webinars because you don't even have to leave your own home to do that," Hawthorne said.
"I have run them in other places and there are hundreds of people. We've done them here, and there aren't so many people calling in."
The review has now moved to the in-person phase of its consultations, and Hawthorne said he wants to see more interest from people, given the significant issues that are being weighed, including whether N.B. Power should remain as a publicly owned utility.
"We really need people to be more engaged," he said.
Public meetings being conducted by the three-person independent panel began Wednesday in Moncton and move next to Saint Andrews and Fredericton. In October, they will head to a variety of communities in northern New Brunswick.
The group was put together by the Holt government in April and given one year to study N.B. Power, consult with the public and recommend a course of action for the debt-laden Crown corporation.
The
independent panel reviewing what to do about N.B. Power has begun
in-person public hearings. They started Wednesday in Moncton and will
conclude for the week in Fredericton on Friday. More hearings are
scheduled for October. (Robert Jones/CBC)
In addition to Hawthorne, the review panel includes Anne Bertrand, the former New Brunswick privacy commissioner and N.B. Power board member, and Michael Bernstein, a utility financial expert.
In Saint John, 60 chairs were set up for Thursday's midday public meeting, but only two dozen people showed and only a smattering of those were not connected in some way to the review, to the provincial government or to the electricity industry.
One self-described "Joe Citizen" who did attend was Saint John resident Richard Folkins. He told the panel he viewed talk of further rate increases by N.B. Power "frightening" and blamed much of that on the utility's problems in its operation of the Point Lepreau nuclear generating station, which he called "a disaster."
Saint
John resident Richard Folkins told the panel in the city on Thursday
that future rate increases being projected by N.B. Power are
'frightening.' (Roger Cosman/CBC)
"It was a rude awakening to N.B. Power, which shocks me," Folkins said. "I don't know how they didn't see this tidal wave coming."
Hawthorne welcomed Folkins comments and called Lepreau "the poorest performing nuclear plant in North America" that has been causing the utility significant financial problems.
"You haven't said anything that we disagree with," he told Folkins. "Not a thing, not a word came out of your mouth that I disagree with."
Randy McKnight, mayor of Valley Waters, said rural residents are struggling with their power bills. (Roger Cosman/CBC)
Randy McKnight, the mayor of the new municipality of Valley Waters, also attended the Saint John session. He told the panel rural residents are struggling with residential prices for electricity increasing by 30 per cent over the last three years.
In an interview, he said people are not widely participating in the review because they are cynical about government consultations. He hopes that will change.
"There's a lack of belief that this will make any positive, lasting change," McKnight said. "As a community we will put this out through our Facebook page and our web page promoting — fill out the surveys, offer your feedback. We want to encourage every resident to give feedback to N.B. Power."
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Reporter
Robert Jones has been a reporter and producer with CBC New Brunswick since 1990. His investigative reports on petroleum pricing in New Brunswick won several regional and national awards and led to the adoption of price regulation in 2006.
From: Randy McKnight <rmcknight@valleywaters.ca>
Date: Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: Just a Hello What is your number?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Sent: 08 July 2024 15:05
To: Charity McDonald <charitymcd@gmail.com>; Randy McKnight <rmcknight@valleywaters.ca>; Charity McDonald <cmcdonald@valleywaters.ca>; Angela McLean <cao@valleywaters.ca>
Cc: blaine.higgs <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>; aaron.kennedy@nbliberal.ca <aaron.kennedy@nbliberal.ca>
Subject: Fwd: Just a Hello What is your number?
Perhaps Madame Holt should ask Minister Mikey about what went down in the EUB on or about the Ides of March???
https://davidraymondamos3.
blogspot.com/2024/03/eub- approves-98-interim-rate- increase.html
From: PCNB <info@pcnb.ca>
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 2:39:09 PM
To: A Buddy
Subject: Where does she (really) stand?
Auditor general reproaches N.B. Power for financial barriers to energy efficiency
Report by Auditor General Paul Martin also questions high salaries for utility executives
New Brunswick's auditor general says N.B. Power needs to do more to address barriers for low- and middle-income New Brunswickers who don't have the money up front for energy efficiency upgrades.
"Moderate-income households may have difficulty accessing NB Power's energy efficiency programs, due to lack of financing mechanisms," Paul Martin says in a report tabled at the legislature Thursday.
It faults the Department of Natural Resources and Energy Development for not requiring N.B. Power to create a loan program when it folded energy efficiency programs into the utility in 2015.
"Low-income households are really being left out if they cannot obtain that funding mechanism to even consider these programs," Martin said while presenting his report to the legislature's public accounts committee.
New Brunswick is one of only two provinces with no financing mechanism in its energy-efficiency programs. Residents must spend the money up front and then get a rebate for part of the amount.
Martin said N.B. Power doesn't need to be the organization providing the loans as long as they're available somehow.
"Being one of only two province not doing it — there must be a way," Martin said. "Almost everybody else is doing it, so why is this an issue?"
Financing mechanisms "are a widely used and a cost-effective tool to make energy efficiency more accessible to moderate and low-income households," says the report, Martin's first since becoming auditor general on Jan. 1.
It quotes N.B. Power replying that it doesn't have the funds to provide loans because of its focus on debt reduction. The utility also pointed out that the federal government announced a major loan program for energy retrofits in its budget last year.
N.B. Power spokesperson Marc Belliveau said in an email the utility's low income energy savings program provides free energy efficient upgrades to eligible homeowners and 466 homes were retrofitted last year.
"N.B. Power is looking at options to expand this program," he said.
The audit says people who don't heat with electricity aren't using the energy-efficiency programs at the same level and that N.B.Power doesn't believe it has to fund them.
New Brunswick's auditor-general Paul Martin says N.B. Power has the highest average salary among Crown agencies. (Submitted by Office of the Auditor General)It also says the department hasn't given N.B.Power any energy efficiency targets and hasn't provided enough oversight of the program.
Martin's report calls for "a plan" to address the issue.
The utility says as part of its response in that it will conduct a "barrier study" by June 2023 looking at other provinces to come up with recommendations "to increase participation" by low- and middle-income households.
"You're asking for a plan and implementation, and you're going to get a study," Liberal MLA René Legacy told Martin.
"We would always like to see our recommendations addressed faster, and as fast as possible," Martin answered.
Highest executive salary
The report also includes a chapter on salaries at provincial Crown agencies that highlights N.B. Power CEO Keith Cronkhite's $560,000 salary as the highest among any head of a provincial Crown agency.
The utility also has the highest average salary among Crown agencies and is the only one to offer a generous "executive retirement supplement" to everyone in the position of vice-president or higher, like the one availabe to deputy ministers.
For employees earning $100,000 a year or more, the utility's salaries also rise at a faster rate than civil servants working for government departments.
N.B. Power President Keith Cronkhite's salary of $560,000 is the highest of any at a Crown corporation in New Brunswick. (Roger Cosman/CBC News)The report recommends the government set out what it means when it says salaries in Part IV of the government, Crown agencies, should be consistent.
"A lack of clear expectations from government increases the risk of government intentions not being carried out," the report says.
"In our view, government should clearly define what it expects of Part IV Crown agencies with regards to non-bargaining salary and benefits practices."
Martin acknowledges N.B. Power and other Crown corporations don't work directly for the government and each organization is allowed to set its own policies.
But the audit says the province provides "some direction" through memoranda of understanding it issues to the Crown agencies every three year.
Executive retirement benefits
While executive salaries at N.B. Power are higher than normal, the utility has less generous health and dental benefits and lower travel expense allowances than other parts of the provincial public sector.
The report also looks at the New Brunswick Financial and Consumer Services Commission, the Research and Productivity Council, Opportunities New Brunswick, the two regional health authorities and others.
But N.B. Power is the only one to offer the executive retirement benefit to senior officials.
If they work for five years or more, senior executives get a retirement supplement of one per cent of their annual salary for every year worked, up to 10 per cent.
For example, an N.B. Power executive with an average salary of $200,000 per year over 10 years would get an additional $20,000 a year during retirement.
That's on top of the regular provincial pension under the New Brunswick Public Service Pension Plan.
Belliveau pointed out the report acknowledges that the utility sector "is a complex one" and N.B. Power has to offer "a competitive compensation package" to attract qualified executives.
He said the retirement supplement is designed to make up for higher salaries and bonus programs that other utilities offer and that N.B. Power doesn't have.
N.B. Power CEO fired as utility embarks on 'transformational change'
Board of directors made decision to fire CEO Keith Cronkhite 2 years after he started in role
The board of directors at N.B. Power has removed its top executive as the Crown corporation embarks on a plan to bring about "transformational change."
The company issued a statement Monday that president and CEO Keith Cronkhite would be stepping down from the position and that Lori Clark, the company's senior vice-president operations would be appointed to the role on an acting basis.
In an interview with CBC News, Charles Firlotte, chair of N.B. Power's board, confirmed the decision to remove Cronkhite was made by the board.
"The board is looking forward to the future and the energy sector in North America — indeed globally — is undergoing massive, massive change, transformational-like, and we need to follow suit.
"And we are also burdened with some pretty significant debt as well, and so we have a steep climb over the next few years and we're looking toward a transformational change from what N.B. Power is today, which is the last of the great monopolies, if you will, to an efficient energy provider for all New Brunswickers."
N.B. Power board chair Charles Firlotte said the company wants to make a transformational change in the way it operates. (CBC)N.B. Power did not make Cronkhite available for an interview Monday afternoon.
His exit comes a little more than two years after he took on the role in April 2020.
A brief biography on N.B. Power's website describes him as having more than 30 years of industry experience.
It doesn't say how long he was with N.B. Power but that he held positions of increasing responsibility within the operations and corporate departments, including his previous role as senior vice-president of business development and strategic planning.
At the time Cronkhite became CEO, N.B. Power had just faced a wave of public scrutiny for its investment in Florida-based Joi Scientific's plan to turn seawater into electricity.
It was also facing pressure to reduce its $4.9 billion debt, which New Brunswick's auditor-general in 2020 said represented 94 per cent of the company's equity.
The Blaine Higgs government has ordered the utility to reduce its debt to 80 per cent of equity by 2027, but in the 2020-21 fiscal year, its debt went up by $9 million.
Natural Resources and Energy Development Minister Mike Holland wasn't made available for an interview, but in an email statement said he reviewed the board's recommendation to fire Cronkhite, and ultimately accepted it.
"The Board of Directors has our full support as it embarks on this corporate transformation for improved performance," Holland said.
Launching strategic review
Along with its decision to remove Cronkhite, N.B. Power has hired PricewaterhouseCoopers to lead a strategic review, "which will include identifying immediate ways to optimize the current cost structure and meet debt obligations, as well as identifying alternative solutions to meet New Brunswickers' power needs in a cost competitive, reliable and environmentally sustainable way," according to its news release.
The board is also starting a search for a new CEO, which is expected to take "several" months.
Speaking to CBC News, Firlotte said an example of new strategies to meet the province's energy needs could look like what was done by Saint John Energy with its Burchill wind-turbine program.
"We have a large coal-fired plant in in Belledune that has a life expectancy of just six or seven years, at least in burning coal, and Coleson Cove, oil-fired as well," Firlotte said.
"So those are going to be essentially stranded assets that we have to replace and we have to make that migration toward, toward renewables as well, to be sure."
Change a good thing, says environmental advocate
Louise Comeau, director of climate change and energy solutions with the Conservation Council of New Brunswick agrees N.B. Power needs to significantly pivot in the way it operates.
"The whole world is moving toward using electricity day-to-day in their lives, and N.B. Power is not ready for that future at all," Comeau said.
Louise
Comeau, director of climate change and energy solutions with the
Conservation Council of New Brunswick, said she's pleased NB Power is
poised to make big changes to how it operates. (Kirk Pennell/CBC)Comeau said large electricity utilities tend to be "conservative" in the way they operate, leaving them slow to respond to new challenges and changes in technology.
She said as an example. the company has poured money into the Point Lepreau Generating Station, leading to much larger debt.
"And that affects rates and it limits our options for the future, particularly around the need for renewable energy, more efficiency, a more flexible energy system.
"We have a fairly traditional approach to that, and we need to think about a new way to generate electricity and to manage electricity."
A surprise for some
Cronkhite's firing came as a surprise to Bathurst West-Beresford MLA Rene Legacy, who serves as energy critic with the Liberals.
He said he has spoken with Cronkhite during house committee meetings and found him to be intelligent and well-spoken.
Plus, he thought N.B. Power was already heading in a new direction under his leadership, especially the recent amendments to the Electricity Act that give the company the ability to pursue new revenue-generating ventures.
Bathurst
West-Beresford MLA René Legacy and Liberal energy critic said he's
surprised and concerned about the firing of Cronkhite. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)"I guess my concern is in the last year-and-a-half, there's been a lot of files brought to the legislature around essentially setting a new direction, setting plans," Legacy said.
"And my understanding was Mr. Cronkhite was the architect of all this, so how do we tie in the fact that, you know, a person that was essentially in charge of all these changes is not there anymore?"
Legacy said N.B. Power's board also appears to be sending a confusing message over its priorities, and whether paying down its debt takes precedence over investing in new green technologies.
Whoever takes over as the next CEO, Kent North MLA Kevin Arseneau said he hopes they plot a long-term vision that sees the utility generating all of its electricity with renewable sources.
"What's extremely important when we talk about N.B. Power is that it's a Crown corporation, it's a public service," he said.
"And so they need to be at the service of the population of the province, moving forward with renewable energies and in a realistic and sustainable way, and bringing, obviously, our solar and wind projects up."
With files from Harry Forestell
N.B. Power management mistakes added to a decade of troubles at nuclear plant
Utility hasn't 'adequately invested' since Lepreau refurbishment, vice-president tells rate hearing
Had the Point Lepreau nuclear generating station gone offline during a late January cold snap earlier this year, N.B. Power would have faced crippling sustained costs of more than $9 million a day to replace its energy, the utility's chief financial officer testified on Tuesday.
Justin Urquhart was explaining the consequences N.B. Power faces when the nuclear plant goes offline and the importance of preventing that from happening.
"If Point Lepreau had been down for seven days during that time period, the incremental cost of fuel and purchased power would been approximately $67 million for those seven days," Urquhart told the New Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board.
N.B. Power is in front of the EUB seeking approval to raise its rates on customers by 4.75 per cent in the coming year to raise an additional $90.4 million in revenue.
Urquhart and N.B. Power senior vice-president Darren Murphy were explaining the utility needs some of that new money to pour into Lepreau to improve its reliability and pay for outside nuclear experts, who have been brought in to supervise operations at the plant.
Murphy said that after more than a decade of disappointing production at Lepreau following its emergence from refurbishment in 2012, "trying something different" and admitting the utility has not done well running the plant on its own, makes sense.
"This is about accelerating performance improvement and sustainment," Murphy said about spending more money at Lepreau and seeking outside expert help.
"What we know for sure is that we have not been able to do it on our own up until now. That's what we know for sure."
N.B.
Power's rate hearing in 2020 was told Lepreau's performance troubles
had largely been dealt with and better days were ahead. Instead, the
plant's three worst years since being refurbished all occurred after
2020. (CBC)Murphy has testified for several years about plans to fix Lepreau's reliability problems, but those plans have often ended in disappointment.
Six years ago, he told the EUB that performance problems until that point were well on their way to being remedied.
"Unfortunately, it did not perform as we would have liked coming out of refurbishment," Murphy said of Lepreau at hearings in February 2020.
"However, past performance is not a good indicator of future performance for Point Lepreau. … We have made some significant investment. The performance has paid off as a result."
Coleson
Cove, N.B. Power's oil-burning generating station, was pressed into
service in December to deal with an unexpected 15-day outage at Lepreau.
N.B. Power says the replacement energy cost it $56 million. (Graham Thompson/CBC)Instead, performance at the plant worsened significantly after 2020.
On Tuesday, Murphy said not enough was spent to fix problems in prior years, but he is confident additional spending and expert management will have a sustained positive effect this time.
A
hearing into N.B. Power's request to raise rates 4.75 per cent finally
got underway in Fredericton Monday, five weeks later than originally
scheduled. (Roger Cosman/CBC)"We believe that we have identified and are closing some of the historical performance gaps," he said.
"We have not adequately invested in the non-nuclear side of Lepreau since refurbishment."
Our Management Team
Our management team is comprised of New Brunswickers and long-time employees. Together, they’re working hard to make the right decisions for our customers today and tomorrow.
Lori Clark - President, CEO

Lori was appointed President, CEO on March 20, 2023, after serving as acting president and CEO since July 4, 2022. Most recently, Lori served as the Senior Vice President, Operations and led the teams responsible for safe and reliable generation (conventional), transmission and distribution of power across the province. Ms. Clark was also accountable for the employees who serve our customers everyday and those focused on modernizing the New Brunswick power grid.
Lori began her career with NB Power in 1990. Since that time, she has held positions of increasing responsibility including Controller, Managing Director of Finance, Executive Director of Regulatory Affairs and Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Strategic Initiatives. Lori has extensive experience with the utility’s rate application process, appearing as a witness for NB Power at several rate hearings.
Lori holds a Bachelor of Business Administration from the University of New Brunswick and is a Chartered Professional Accountant. Lori has also studied Nuclear Reactor Technology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Leadership at the Wharton School of Business.
Darren Murphy – Senior Vice President, Major Projects

Darren Murphy is NB Power’s Chief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President Corporate Services and Major Projects. He is responsible for Finance, Technology, Procurement, Regulatory, Enterprise Risk, Legal as well as other corporate services and also oversees major projects such as the Mactaquac Life Achievement Project.
Darren joined NB Power's executive team in 2007 and was appointed Chief Financial Officer in 2010. In addition to his current role, he has held executive responsibilities for a number of areas including Vice President of Distribution and Customer Service and Vice President of Transmission, Human Resources, Corporate Environment, Corporate Health and Safety and Corporate Information Systems. He worked for over 17 years in Distribution field operations before joining the executive team.
Darren is currently a member of the Board of Directors for the New Brunswick Energy Marketing Corporation (NBEMC). In addition, Darren has also been a past board member for the Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO) from 2010-2019, the New Brunswick Investment Management Corporation (NBIMC) from 2010-2016 as well as the Northeast Power Coordinating Council (NPCC) from 2008-2010.
Darren has received the ICD.D designation from the Institute of Corporate Directors, has completed the Reactor Technology course for Utility Executives at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from the University of New Brunswick.
James Petrie – Chief Legal Officer

James (Jamie) Petrie was appointed Chief Legal Officer of NB Power in November 2020 following a 17-year career in the commercial real estate industry where he was formerly Chief Operating Officer & General Counsel for Plaza Retail REIT, a publicly-traded entity specializing in retail properties across Canada with assets of over $1.2 billion. In his current role, Jamie is responsible for the Legal, Real Estate, Insurance, Facilities, Procurement, Supply Chain, Fleet, and Internal Energy Management divisions at NB Power.
Jamie is a graduate of the University of New Brunswick with a Bachelor of Business Administration degree with Distinction in 1990, followed by a Law degree as a Beaverbrook Scholar in 1994. Jamie went on to obtain a Master of Laws degree from Duke University in 1995.
A member of the New Brunswick bar, Jamie is a former partner in Atlantic Canada’s largest law firm where he specialized in Employment Law and taught the subject at UNB Law School for 7 years, along with co-authoring the book “Conducting a Wrongful Dismissal” for Carswell Publishing in 1996.
Jamie has held multiple leadership roles in his volunteer activities over his 30+ year legal career, including President of the Fredericton YMCA, Chair of the Fredericton Community Foundation, Chair of the UNB Beaverbrook Scholars Awards, Executive member of the UNB Alumni Council, Chair of the Labour & Employment Section of the Canadian Bar Association, and Chair of the Government Relations Committee of the International Council of Shopping Centres based in Washington, D.C.
Justin Urquhart — Chief Financial Officer

Justin Urquhart was appointed Chief Financial Officer at NB Power in October 2025 after having joined the organization in January 2024. He is responsible for all areas of Finance including Regulatory and Compliance. Prior to joining NB Power, Justin spent his career in the private sector with a large multinational corporation and one of the big four global accounting firms.
Justin holds a Bachelor of Business Administration from the University of New Brunswick, a Masters of Business Administration from Western University and is a Chartered Professional Accountant (Chartered Accountant) along with various other certifications.
Executives
Andrew MacGillivray
Chairman Executive BoardMr. Andrew MacGillivray has been the Chairman of the company since 2023. He also serves as the Principal of Laurent Maxime Consultancy. Prior to this, he served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Gay Lea Foods. Previously, he held leadership roles with both private and public companies including Saputo, Agrifoods, Baxter Foods and Nestle.
Charles V. Firlotte Appointed NB Power Board Chair
2021-03-04
NB Power of Fredericton, New Brunswick, is pleased to announce the appointment of Charles (Chuck) Firlotte as Chair of its Board of Directors.

Mr. Firlotte is a seasoned executive with both domestic and international experience in environmental, energy and utility service industries in Canada, the USA, the United Kingdom, China and Turks and Caicos, British West Indies. He brings a proven record of driving customer satisfaction and shareholder value to his new role.
As principal of Laurent Maxime Consultancy, Mr. Firlotte provides management consulting services dedicated to helping businesses thrive. He has worked with company leaders in Canada, the United States and the Caribbean, guiding them through strategic planning and leadership development. Mr. Firlotte honed his expertise over the course of three-plus decades, including more than 15 years as President and CEO of Aquarion Company, the seventh largest, private water utility in the United States.
“I am honoured to chair the Board of Directors as we lead NB Power through a transformational change in the way it does business,” says Mr. Firlotte. “We will focus on achieving financial results for New Brunswickers, evolving and expanding NB Power’s services and customer experience and minimizing our environmental footprint while continuing to provide reliable, essential service that powers all of New Brunswick.”
Originally from northern New Brunswick, Mr. Firlotte has maintained his connection with the province while residing in the United States and Britain. He earned an undergraduate degree from St. Thomas University (where he served on the board of directors from 2004 to 2014) and a graduate degree from the faculty of social sciences, University of Ottawa. He also is a graduate of the Advanced Management Program, Harvard Business School.
Since joining the NB Power Board in 2014, Mr. Firlotte has leveraged his experience to offer strategic and thoughtful insights that have been invaluable to the Board and management. His inspirational and effective change leadership approach will provide essential guidance to NB Power’s management and the Board to successfully transform the way NB Power does business.
Mr. Firlotte assumed the role of Chair following the retirement of Ed Barrett, who joined the NB Power Board of Directors in 2007 and assumed the role of Chair in 2010. NB Power appreciates the leadership Mr. Barrett provided the Board through his unique combination of strengths in business management and corporate governance, complemented by his commitment to serving the province and the people of New Brunswick.
MEDIA CONTACT: Sheila Lagacé, Communications, NB Power, 506-458-2345 or SLagace@nbpower.com.
Fired and current N.B. Power bosses the highest-paid provincial employees in 2023
Fired N.B. Power CEO remains top earner
Keith Cronkhite, the CEO of N.B. Power who was fired in July 2022, was the province's top-paid public servant in 2023. He earned between $575,000 and $599,999 that year.
The information was released as part of a list of all government employees making over $80,000 in the previous year, known as the "Sunshine List."
Cronkhite topped the list for a fourth straight year.
Published each December, the salaries are published online but only include a salary range for each person instead of an exact number.
Cronkhite's 2023 salary was larger than his past salaries, likely due to a severance payout. He made between $600,000 and $624,999 in 2022, and between $475,000 and $499,999 in 2021.
The company's replacement CEO, Lori Clark, who stepped in as acting president in July 2022 and was appointed CEO in March 2023, came second on this year's list, making between $475,000 and $499,999.
N.B. Powers' Darren Murphy, chief financial officer and senior vice-president of corporate services and major projects, came in eighth, making between $375,000 and $399,999.
Point Lepreau workers place high
Leaders of Point Lepreau, N.B. Power's besieged nuclear plant, also placed high. It was shut down for eight months in 2024 because of generator trouble.
Darren Elliott made between $350,000 and $374,999. A LinkedIn account with the same name lists him as a shift supervisor at the plant since 2015.
The
Point Lepreau nuclear station was shut down for much of this year. Two
leaders at the plant place high on the sunshine list in 2023. (Marc Godbout/Radio-Canada) Mark Power made between $325,000 and $349,999. An N.B. Power bulletin from 2018 announced Power as the new station director for Point Lepreau.
N.B. Power employees made up 51 of the top 100 spots on this year's list. This comes as the utility just won the ability to raise customer rates an average of 19 per cent over two years.
Judges and healthcare workers
Judges came next on the list, with Jacques Desjardins and Kenneth Oliver making between $400,000 and $424,999. Oliver retired in December 2023 while the subject of a disciplinary proceeding for misconduct.
The profession dominates the highest earner spots this year, with 26 of the top 35 earners in the province listed as judges.
Judges made up most of the highest-earning spots on the list. (CBC)The fifth-highest paid public employee of 2023 was Dragana Kelly of Horizon Health Network, who is not an executive. She made $400,000 and $424,999, an increase of about $25,000 from 2022. That's more than the salaries of both health authority executives.
The Nurses Association of New Brunswick lists her as a registered nurse since 2017 in the Veterans Health Unit in Fredericton.
Vitalité Health Network's France Desrosiers earned between $350,000 and $374,999, unchanged from her salary the previous year. She faces pressure this year for the health authority's involvement in travel nurse contracts during the pandemic.
Horizon CEO Margaret Melanson earned between $325,000 and $349,999, an increase from the previous year. She was made permanent CEO in May 2024 after being interim CEO following the firing of CEO John Dornan under the Blaine Higgs government.
Melanson now finds Dornan as her boss after he was appointed health minister by Premier Susan Holt this fall.
Margaret Melanson, CEO of Horizon, saw her salary increase this year. (Horizon/Zoom)Susan Brien, Horizon's senior vice-president for medical, academic and research affairs, made the same amount as Melanson.
Jennifer Russell, who resigned as the province's chief medical officer of health in October 2023, made between $300,000 and $324,999. That's a slight decrease from her salary the previous year.
Yves Léger, who's been the acting chief medical officer since Russell's departure, also made between $300,000 and $324,999 for 2023.
Kim Barker with the Health Department also made that same amount. She's the medical officer of health for the Saint John region, taking the job after resigning from a similar post in Northern Ontario after a scandal.
Mark McKelvie, Fredericton's medical officer, made between $250,000 and $274,999.
Other various roles
Lori Stickles, CEO of N.B. Liquor, made between $300,000 and $324,999 for 2023.
Service New Brunswick CEO Allan Roy made between $250,000 and $274,999.
Higgs earned just over $220,000 in 2023, which accounts for his salary plus a ministerial top-up and car and travel expenses.
Former premier Blaine Higgs made just over $220,000 in 2023. (Stephen MacGillivray/The Canadian Press)Louis Leger, Higgs's former chief of staff who left in January 2023, received a severance of $200,000 to $224,999.
The highest-paid deputy minister was Cheryl Hansen of the Finance and Treasury Board, making between $300,000 and $324,999. She was also clerk of the executive council under the Higgs government. Eric Beaulieu of the Health Department came second with between $225,000 and $249,999.
The largest retirement payment, between $225,000 and $249,999, went to Mary Ellen Kingston-Ritchie, the director of student development for New Brunswick Community College.
N.B. Power pitches a premium 'net-zero' rate while its greenhouse gas emissions surge
Utility burned nearly 4 million barrels of oil this year as 'thermal' generation hits 16-year high
N.B. Power has had a difficult financial year, but evidence presented at its ongoing rate hearing shows it may be posting even worse environmental results.
Updated generation information filed with the New Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board shows the utility has burned more fossil fuels to generate electricity in the past 12 months than it has in over a decade, almost certainly sending its annual greenhouse gas emissions above the three-million-tonnes threshold.
The increased reliance on burning coal, oil, petroleum coke and natural gas to generate electricity comes despite pledges by N.B. Power to transform itself into a "net-zero" utility by 2035.
"We recognize the threats of climate change and that there is still much more work to do to limit the effects," it states on its website about plans to cut its emissions.
At its current hearing, N.B. Power is proposing to implement a special premium "net-zero" rate that customers can pay to receive only non-emitting energy at their location although details of how that will work have been limited.
N.B.
Power's chief financial officer, Justin Urquhart, said tightening
carbon charges on the utility imposed by the province to penalize the
burning of fossil fuels will cost it $49 million in the coming year. (Roger Cosman/CBC)Asked about the rate earlier this week, N.B. Power senior vice-president Darren Murphy acknowledged the utility is limited in how green it can be at the moment because of its continued practice of burning petroleum, coal and gas products to make electricity.
"If you looked at the generation assets of New Brunswick, then, you know, you would have still a fair amount of fossil generation," he said.
The surge in emissions this year also comes despite tightening New Brunswick environmental penalties on fossil fuel use by industry.
Earlier this week, N.B. Power's chief financial officer, Justin Urquhart, complained that provincial carbon penalties faced by the utility have been escalating and adding to its financial troubles.
"It wasn't that long ago that N.B. Power had a carbon tax payment of $0," said Urquhart.
"That is now approximately $49 million, and that is increasing to approximately $69.11 million by 2028-2029."
Craig
Church, N.B. Power's chief corporate modeler, produced a report for its
rate hearing showing the utility generated more electricity from
burning fossil fuels than it has in 16 years. (YouTube/EUB)The generation update for the hearing was prepared by N.B. Power's chief corporate modeler, Craig Church.
He noted the "increased coal and heavy fuel oil generation' in actual results he documented into late 2025 and then projected out to the end of this March.
The biggest change is the expected incineration of an estimated 3.8 million barrels of heavy fuel oil at the Coleson Cove generating station in Saint John.
That's 60 per cent more than last year.
In recent months, the plant has been pressed into service more regularly to generate power partly to help with downtime at the Point Lepreau nuclear station and partly to take advantage of spikes in export prices.
Between Coleson Cove, the coal and petroleum coke burning station in Belledune and natural gas generating station in Saint John, Church's report showed N.B. Power would be producing 5.2 million megawatt hours of electricity from fossil fuels in the current year.
According to N.B. Power annual reports, that is the most "thermal" generation it has relied on in 16 years.
From: Hoyt, Len <len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 2:50 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: [EXTERNAL] Re: Matter 552 - NB Power 2024-2025 And Games People Play
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Notice This
communication, including any attachments, is confidential and may be
protected by solicitor/client privilege. It is intended only for the
person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you have received this
e-mail in error, please notify the sender by e-mail or telephone at
McInnes Cooper's expense.
Avis Les
informations contenues dans ce courriel, y compris toute(s) pièce(s)
jointe(s), sont confidentielles et peuvent faire l'objet d'un privilège
avocat-client. Les informations sont dirigées au(x) destinataire(s)
seulement. Si vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser
l'expéditeur par courriel ou par téléphone, aux frais de McInnes Cooper.
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: Matter 552 - NB Power 2024-2025 And Games People Play
To: <chairperson@nbcpd.org>, <JohnFurey@fureylegal.com>, <Dave.Young@nbeub.ca>, <dmadsen.consulting@gmail.com>, <pierreroy@edmundston.ca>, <ray.robinson@sjenergy.com>, <dan.dionne@perth-andover.com>, <dg@edmundston.ca>, <DaMurphy@nbpower.com>, <len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>, <LClark@nbpower.com>, <John.Herron@gnb.ca>, <Don.Monahan@legnb.ca>, <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, <Rob.Weir@gnb.ca>, <Ian.Lee@legnb.ca>, <Kris.Austin@legnb.ca>, <NBPRegulatory@nbpower.com>, <Ron.marcolin@cme-mec.ca>, <louis-philippe.gauthier@cfib.ca>, <jeff.garrett@sjenergy.com>, <shelley.wood@sjenergy.com>, <Kim.Embleton@gnb.ca>
Cc: <premier@gnb.ca>, <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, <Rene.Legacy@gnb.ca>, <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, <Bill.Oliver@gnb.ca>, <John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, <Alain.Chiasson2@gnb.ca>, <Melissa.Curran@nbeub.ca>
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Thu, May 4, 2023 at 2:32 PM
Subject: Fwd: Motion - Matter 529 Mr. Chiasson agrees with the position of JDI???
To: Kim.Embleton <Kim.Embleton@gnb.ca>
---------- Original message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 16:31:54 -0300
Subject: Re: Motion - Matter 529 Mr. Chiasson agrees with the position of JDI???
To: Melissa Curran <Melissa.Curran@nbeub.ca>
Cc: "ceo@fermenbfarm.ca" <ceo@fermenbfarm.ca>,
"louis-philippe.gauthier@cfib.
"frederic.gionet@cfib.ca" <frederic.gionet@cfib.ca>,
"Ron.marcolin@cme-mec.ca" <Ron.marcolin@cme-mec.ca>,
"david.sollows@gnb.ca" <david.sollows@gnb.ca>,
"hanrahan.dion@jdirving.com" <hanrahan.dion@jdirving.com>,
"nrubin@stewartmckelvey.com" <nrubin@stewartmckelvey.com>,
"coneil@stewartmckelvey.com" <coneil@stewartmckelvey.com>,
"lmclements@stewartmckelvey.
"pbowman@bowmaneconomics.ca" <pbowman@bowmaneconomics.ca>,
"brudderham@stewartmckelvey.
"JohnFurey@fureylegal.com" <JohnFurey@fureylegal.com>,
"jpetrie@nbpower.com" <jpetrie@nbpower.com>,
"NBPRegulatory@nbpower.com" <NBPRegulatory@nbpower.com>,
"lgordon@nbpower.com" <lgordon@nbpower.com>, "SWaycott@nbpower.com"
<SWaycott@nbpower.com>, "George.Porter@nbpower.com"
<George.Porter@nbpower.com>, "kevgibson@nbpower.com"
<kevgibson@nbpower.com>, Veronique Otis <Veronique.Otis@nbeub.ca>,
"Young, Dave" <Dave.Young@nbeub.ca>, "Aherrington@lawsoncreamer.com
<Aherrington@lawsoncreamer.com
<Kathleen.Mitchell@nbeub.ca>, NBEUB/CESPNB <General@nbeub.ca>,
"Colwell, Susan" <Susan.Colwell@nbeub.ca>,
"bhavumaki@synapse-energy.com" <bhavumaki@synapse-energy.com>
"mwhited@synapse-energy.com" <mwhited@synapse-energy.com>,
"prhodes@synapse-energy.com" <prhodes@synapse-energy.com>,
"alawton@synapse-energy.com" <alawton@synapse-energy.com>,
"jwilson@resourceinsight.com" <jwilson@resourceinsight.com>,
"pchernick@resourceinsight.com
"alain.chiasson2@gnb.ca" <alain.chiasson2@gnb.ca>, "rdk@indecon.com"
<rdk@indecon.com>, "tammy.grieve@mcinnescooper.
<tammy.grieve@mcinnescooper.
<paul.black@twinriverspaper.
<len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>, "tyler.rajeski@
<tyler.rajeski@
"darcy.ouellette@
<darcy.ouellette@
<dan.murphy@umnb.ca>, "jeff.garrett@sjenergy.com"
<jeff.garrett@sjenergy.com>, "shelley.wood@sjenergy.com"
<shelley.wood@sjenergy.com>, "dan.dionne@perth-andover.com"
<dan.dionne@perth-andover.com>
<pierreroy@edmundston.ca>, "ryan.mitchell@sjenergy.com"
<ryan.mitchell@sjenergy.com>, "sstoll@stollprofcorp.com"
<sstoll@stollprofcorp.com>, "pzarnett@bdrenergy.com"
<pzarnett@bdrenergy.com>
CHAIRPERSON: Thank you. Ms. Rubin?
MS. RUBIN: And thank you, Mr. Chair. Just to respond to a few
points made by my friend, Mr. Furey. He made the point that it is not
appropriate to seasonally allocate costs without the appropriate price
signals, because customers cannot change their consumption patterns
and that is the concern that if you adopt this without price signals,
rate signals, they can’t change. But what I -- I certainly want --
and Mr. Chiasson agrees with the position of JDI, that rate design
absent, is not required to be coincidental with cost allocation. And
the fact is NB Power already uses an element of seasonal cost
allocation in their CCAS Study. And Mr. Todd refers to that in his
evidence. And I don’t know if you want to pull it up or I will -- I
think I will, please. Mr. Todd’s April 17, 2023 evidence.
CHAIRPERSON: What page, Ms. Rubin?
MS. RUBIN: 4. And it is the second -- page 4, please. Thank you. Yeah.
So the second paragraph speaks to it -- third sentence, it says, the
current CCAS also allocates a portion of generation fixed costs that
are not allocated to production are allocated to the classes based on
peak demand 3CP which is seasonable -- seasonal. And then the
footnote 5 says, roughly one-third of NB Power’s total revenue
requirement is allocated to customer classes on the basis of peak
demand using the 3CP allocator which is essentially a seasonal
allocator.
So the CCAS already uses an element of seasonal allocation, and the
reason for that is that seasonal use is a key cost driver on the
system. Residential customers are charged a flat rate without a
demand charge. So they are not receiving this oh so important price
signal associated with the 3CP demand. There is no rate signals now
from peak demand charges and there is no way to avoid those. So
rather than that flat energy charge, NB Power could charge inclining
block rates which would send a conservation signal if that is what was
required. But they have chosen a simplistic rate design for
residential classes. And seasonal allocation can be done now.
Seasonal rates could be done now. The evidence of the Brattle Group
was very clear that seasonal rates are a no brainer. It had
widespread public acceptance. It was number one in terms of what
should we do prior to AMI, the answer was seasonal rate design.
Nay Not So
Matter No. 529
NEW BRUNSWICK ENERGY AND UTILITIES BOARD
NOTICE OF MOTION (Rule 4.3)
In Relation to an Application by: New Brunswick Power Corporation (“NB Power”)
In Accordance with: Section 103(1) of the Electricity Act, SNB 2013,
c.E-7, to the New Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board with respect to
proposed changes to its rate structure, rates classes and rate design.
TO: The New Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board (the “Board”)
AND TO: All Interveners registered in the above-noted matter
J.D. Irving, Limited (“JDI”) is making a motion before the Board
seeking leave to expand the scope of the Matter pursuant to Rule 4.3
and the Board Decision of January 9, 2023, to seek an order approving
a methodological refinement to the customer cost allocation study
(“CCAS”) through consideration of the impacts of seasonality as a cost
driver and the allocation of these energy costs.
The basis for the Motion is as follows:
1. JDI states that it is timely to determine whether the CCAS should
include seasonal allocation of costs coincident with the issues to be
addressed within this rate design application.
2. Considering the antecedent decisions of the Board, along with the
methodology, inputs, and evidence contained in this Matter 529,
seasonal allocation is a foundational component to ensuring cost
reflective rates.
3. Sufficient data exists now to allocate energy costs on a seasonal
basis. Doing so now allows for a more granular and accurate evaluation
of any intra- and inter-class impacts created by proposed rate
designs, new rate classes and the movement of customers. This
consideration helps to ensure the new rates are fair and equitable to
customer classes in the future and aligned with the goal of bringing
customer classes within a revenue to cost ratio range of 95 to 105.
Background
4. NB Power has brought an Application before the Board for what it
describes as the initial phase of setting new rate designs, including
reclassification of customers classes “in concept” such as the
classification of commercial and industrial customers into small,
medium, large and transmission-connected classes. Additionally, it is
seeking two amendments to the CCAS (Items 8 and 9 in the Notice of
Application). NB Power has not sought changes to the CCAS on the basis
of seasonal cost allocation.
5. Following a motion brought by NB Power on December 20, 2020 to seek
directions on the scope of this Matter for purposes of responding to
certain Interrogatories on the CCAS, including issues of seasonality,
the Board confirmed on January 9, 2023 that:
(a) interrogatories posed by intervenors regarding issues of cost
allocation, including issues of seasonality, are relevant and directed
they be answered; and
(b) the scope of the proceeding was defined by the Application filed
by NB Power, but Intervenors could seek leave of the Board to have
issues related to additional changes to the cost allocation
methodology be heard as part of Matter 529.
6. JDI is now seeking leave to have the issue of seasonality, and the
requisite changes to the cost allocation methodology be included
within the scope of Matter 529.
Previous Board Decisions on Cost Allocation and Rate Design
7. The procedural history of this Matter is long. The issues relating
to cost of service and setting new rate designs have been ongoing and
outstanding for years. Seasonality has formed part of the discussion
for the entirety.
8. Starting with cost allocation, NB Power applied in October 2014 for
approval of its CCAS Methodology (Matter 271). Following a procedural
conference, the Board determined that additional studies were required
and adjourned the matter, with directions.1 Among the directions were
for NB Power to file a study by October 30, 2015 on seasonal
allocation of costs, including a recommendation on whether and how it
should be incorporated into the CCAS methodology. In response, NSPI
filed a study by Elenchus.2
9. In the Board’s decision of May 13, 2016, the Board characterized
the issues as follows:
Should the Board consider introducing seasonality, based solely on the
allocation of energy related costs, and should production costs be
seasonally allocated in the absence of seasonal rates?
10. After reviewing the evidence and arguments before it on the first
sub-issue, at paras. 75-83, the Board confirmed at para 84 that
“seasonal allocation of costs, including energy costs, is a generally
accepted approach”; it “adds precision” and “there is value in
considering this methodology.” The Board accepted in principle that
allocation on the basis of seasonality is valid and allocation of
energy costs was possible at that time, although more information was
required relating to demand allocation.
11. On the second sub-issue, the Board reviewed the evidence and
arguments at para. 88-91 of the decision. It expressed a reluctance to
allocate energy and demand costs seasonally “at this time”, without a
corresponding seasonal rate design so as to send the appropriate
customer price signals. It directed NB Power to “prepare a proposed
strategy for the timely introduction of seasonal allocation of energy
and demand production costs together with a corresponding rate design
strategy” (emphasis added), to be filed with the Board by June 1,
2017.3
12. On May 1, 2017, NB Power filed an application in Matter 357
related to rate design. Within that filing, NB Power stated that a
separate yet related filing would be completed by June 1, 2017 on a
proposed strategy for the timely introduction of seasonal allocation
of energy and demand production costs, together with a corresponding
rate design strategy specific to that allocation issue.
13. On June 1, 2017, NB Power filed its “strategy” together with
supporting reports by Elenchus and CCAS models and sensitivities. NB
Power agreed with the Elenchus “Main Option” for cost allocation with
a two-season approach (peak season being the five winter months of
November to March and off-peak being April to October).4 NB Power
requested that the Board “consider” the proposed seasonal cost
allocation and rate design strategy but not approve or implement until
1) seasonal rate design is “further studied”; 2) improved load
research data from AMI is available; 3) time of use or other load
shifting programs are also considered and 4) NB Power addresses the
issues from Matter 357 i.e., new rate structures addressing
inter-class inequity issues.5
14. It took several years for Matter 357 to conclude. Initially, the
rate design issues were adjourned and then consolidated with the
2019-2020 General Rate Application in Matter 430. Later, Matter 357
was bifurcated from the GRA to be determined separately again.
15. In order to conclude Matter 357, the Board retained the Brattle
Group as an independent facilitator to help define the issues to be
determined. Stakeholder sessions were held and ultimately the Board
received a report entitled “Stakeholder Perspectives on Rate Design
Reform” dated November 8, 20196 which was presented by Dr. Ahmad
Faruqui of the Brattle Group.
16. The Brattle Group Stakeholder Perspectives Report addressed rate
design options without AMI. With respect to seasonal rates, it states:
Seasonal rates are the simplest form of time-varying rates, in that
they include higher charges during the peak season and lower charges
during the off-peak season to better align prices with costs and bring
them into conformity with the Bonbright principle of cost causation.
For example, a winter-peaking utility could better capture both higher
energy and capacity costs associated with serving winter loads by
setting higher energy charges in the winter than in the summer when
costs are lower. Seasonal rates have the benefit of being relatively
simple and understandable to customers, and can be combined with other
rate designs like block rates to convey stronger price signals. They
have been implemented by utilities with non-AMI technology for over 40
years.
… Seasonal rates emerged as the leading rate design without AMI
through the scorecard exercise at the second workshop, consistent with
the first workshop results.7
17. Seasonal rates do not require that AMI be in place at individual
customer sites. In the presentation of the Brattle Group on May 12,
2020, Dr. Faruqui confirmed seasonal rates are not tied to AMI data.
In the Transcript of the presentation, Dr. Faruqui stated that “…
without AMI, you can still do seasonal rates”, “…without AMI the most
popular rate is seasonal”, and “[t]hen came the issue that simpler
rate designs should be considered before more complex ones. Like
seasonal rates do not require AMI.”8 Seasonal rate designs can be
established based on system-level information retained by NB Power
today.
18. During the presentation, it was also made clear that seasonal
rates and the implementation of seasonal rates was viewed as a “no
brainer” and a “first step” in rate design.9 Seasonal rates were
described as an incremental first step toward moving to more
cost-reflective rates. In the Transcript of the presentation, Dr.
Faruqui, stated:
All you need is some system level data to see if there is substantial
seasonal variation between your summer and winter seasons. Then that
obviously has to be reflected in your cost structure at some level.
And if it is, then basically seasonal rates could be, you know,
implemented. The only question would be what is the differential
between the seasonal rates between the peak season and the off- peak
season. And that kind of analysis can be done using system level data
as opposed to a detailed class level analysis. (page 255-256)
19. Regardless that this matter was discussed, and was a live issue in
Matter 357, it appears that seasonal allocation and seasonal rates
were never explicitly addressed by the Board, or implemented by NB
Power. This specific issue did not form part of the Board’s decision
which set the parameters of this current Matter.
20. The Board’s decision in Matter 357, August 4, 2020 directed NB
Power to do the following by June 2021:
(a) Propose how to address the gap for under-represented customers;
(b) Continue its load research program and file results;
(c) File an application to address certain equity issues:
(i) appropriately classify commercial and industrial customers;
(ii) eliminate the GS II class on a timely basis;
(iii) address grandfathering of farms and churches and if a charitable
class should exist; and
(iv) propose whether the Board should or should not forebear from
regulating street lights, unmetered customers and water heaters and
file an updated CCAS for these classes.
21. The Board described the above as phase one and stated that in the
second phase it would identify rate design options and determine the
rate structure, with the final phase establishing and implementing a
new rate design.
22. It is important to emphasize that the initial phase of this rate
design process, as outlined in the decision of Matter 357, was meant
to address short-term rate design issues. The allocation of seasonal
costs was contemplated as far back as 2016, and was viewed as an
incremental first step in appropriate cost allocation and rate design.
23. The Board direction in Matter 271, which required a strategy for
seasonal allocation of energy and demand production costs with
corresponding rate design and NB Power’s request for the Board’s
consideration of its strategy in Matter 357 has still never been
explicitly addressed by the Board or actioned by NB Power. This should
and could be addressed in the current rate design matter, in which the
rate designs are being formulated in concept.
Seasonality will Improve Cost of Service Modeling and Reclassification
of Customers
24. The rationale for seasonal cost allocation is quite simply:
fairness. Allocating seasonal costs concurrently with other rate
design proposals will more accurately and transparently demonstrate
any concerns with new classifications.
25. NB Power is seeking to set new rates that better reflect actual
costs to serve, and will allow for differentiated rates in the future.
While NB Power is seeking approval of new rates or classes, “in
concept”, cost allocation is still fundamental to ensuring that the
proposed changes are reasonable and equitable amongst its customer
base. Taking consideration of proper cost allocation principles at the
beginning of the analysis, ensures the rates will not lead to
inequitable division of costs and classes, that will need to be
amended significantly in the future.
26. Assessing cost allocation on the basis of seasonality as a cost
driver improves accuracy of cost allocation. The consideration of
seasonal costs provides a deeper level of granularity into the cost of
service modeling, and enhances accuracy of cost allocation amongst
customers, including prevention of intra-class subsidization. This is
a point that the Board has previously explicitly recognized and ought
to consider before setting new rate designs and, especially, new
categories of rate classes.
27. Seasonality as a pattern of use matters. NB Power proposes new
rate designs and rate classes on the basis of equity, but omits
consideration of this key equitable factor. Without consideration of
seasonal variations in costs, the Board (and customers) will be left
with a false sense of equity that leaves out a key component of cost
allocation.
28. In creating new groupings of customer classes, NB Power proposes
to categorize customers with similar electricity usage patterns. The
groupings should be as homogenous as possible, in respect of their
impact on the system. NB Power cannot assess that or do that without
considering the impact of seasonality on demand and energy costs.
Drastically different seasonal requirements could lead to the need for
different customer class groups.
29. JDI submits that NB Power is not able to make accurate or
appropriate rate changes, or customer class changes, when Revenue/Cost
Ratios are not indicative of the true cost of service.
Seasonality Should be Considered Now to promote Efficiency and Equity
in Setting Rates
30. Rate designs should be established correctly, or a close to
correctly, now. Backtracking should be avoided, and all key
considerations to setting equitable rates should be explored at this
time before rate designs and rate classes are set in concept.
31. Rate design is based on cost allocation, and cost impacts affect
rates. The new rates cannot be designed in a vacuum. As outlined by
the Board in its decision of January 9, 2023, “[m]atters of rate
design and cost allocation are interrelated”, and NB Power’s proposals
in this proceeding are not “immune from cost allocation
considerations” (at page 133).
32. Considering that the issue of seasonality has been at the
forefront of the prior cost allocation and rate design matters in
Matters 271 and 357, it should not now be left off of the issues list
to be addressed at another unspecified future date. The strategy for
implementation of seasonal allocation was directed to be “timely”. As
previously outlined by the Brattle group, the consideration of
seasonality is a “no brainer” first step in cost allocation and
setting of new rates. Likewise, consideration of seasonality should be
examined alongside the new rates being proposed to ensure they are
reasonable and fair to customer classes. If there are more reasonable
and fair rate designs and cost allocation, that should be known.
33. In Matter 271, the Board previously stated that issues of
unfairness on the basis of seasonal patterns “is a matter properly
considered in the context of a hearing in which rate design and rates
are under consideration”. That is this Matter. The bases of the new
rate designs are being set – at least in concept. In order to ensure
the new customer class groupings do not foster intra-class
subsidization, the consideration of seasonality should be considered
before conceptualizing the rates and classes. Otherwise, when the
issue is inevitably considered down the road, it may lead to
re-working the previously set designs and classes. This is
duplicative, costly, and inefficient.
34. As outlined in the Report of Patrick Bowman, filed in support of
this motion, cost allocation generally comes before rate design. The
reason for this order of process includes ensuring that the recovery
of costs is fairly allocated between customer classes, on the basis of
causation (para 7). Proper cost allocation prior to, or when designing
rates, helps to reduce cross-subsidization, control of utility costs,
and encourage efficient use of electricity.
35. Rate setting should be done with all the information in hand at
the outset. Leaving significant issues, that drive costs, to be
considered later will potentially lead to re-writing or reconsidering
decisions made by the Board.
36. NB Power, in its submissions before the Board on January 9, 2023,
raised the risk of potential intra-class unfairness on residential
class members who do not use baseboard heating, and “that's why NB
Power has consistently argued that until there's a rate design,
complementary rate designed to deal with those issues, it's premature
to allocate the costs.10
37. There is no inherent unfairness in more accurate cost allocation.
NB Power has a flat tariff for its residential class, which itself
creates a certain amount of intra-class cross-subsidization;
nonetheless, this is often tolerated as cost of service is not a
perfect science and Bonbright’s criterion of simplicity with a flat
tariff is often favoured with the residential class. If NB Power
perceives an unfairness to seasonal allocation, it continues to be
open to NB Power to bring forward a rate design to address this. To
date, it has not done so.
38. The consideration of seasonal cost allocation into the CCAS, does
not need to be completed at the same time as seasonal rates. Other
Canadian jurisdictions recognize varying costs depending on time of
year or level of usage to allocate costs, in the absence of such
rates. Mr. Bowman outlines in his Report at paragraph 7 that there are
various utilities in Manitoba and British Columbia, specifically
Manitoba Hydro, Centra Gas Manitoba, and FortisBC, that use or have
used seasonal weighted considerations as a means to more accurately
allocate cost of service in the absence of a seasonal or time of use
rate. Also, as previously outlined by Mark Drazen in Matter 271, Nova
Scotia allocates costs on a monthly basis.11 More granular cost
allocation, including on the basis of seasonality, is not uncommon, in
the absence of seasonal rates.
39. JDI submits that there is now sufficient data and evidence in this
Matter to consider seasonal cost allocation. Unlike in 2017, NB Power
has now conducted and filed updated Load Research, at Exhibit NBP1.22,
which includes information on monthly demand and energy usage for the
customer classes. Energy costs can be allocated on a seasonal basis
now, because they are easily identifiable. In response to JDI’s
Interrogatories 20g and i, NB Power provided CCAS models on a monthly
and seasonal bases, at Exhibits NBP 7.14-7.17.
40. It is also important to note that in proposing new customer
classes, NB Power is already analyzing customers based on size and
load factor in considering relative load characteristics of the
customers in proposing the new class structure. In the Report of
Christensen Associates Energy Consulting, LLC, Exhibit NBP 1.11 and
updated at Exhibit NBP 7.18, customer load shape, and pattern and
timing of usage is already being analyzing to some degree. Analysis of
seasonality and timing of usage as a consideration in class design is
already before the Board. However, the picture of cost allocation on
this basis is not complete and should be complete.
1 Order, April 9, 2015, Doc. 3131.
2 Exhibit NBP 10.02, Matter 271.
3 NBP incorporated certain modification to the CCAS as directed by the
Board in the 2017/2018 General Rate Application, Matter 336. There was
no reference to seasonal allocation of costs.
4 Exhibit NBP 2.03 at p.7 in Matter 357.
5 Exhibit NBP2.01, in Matter 357.
6 This document can be found in “Other Related Documents” within
Matter 357. In Matter 529, this Report can also be found at NBP 1.07
Appendix Ai.
7 NBP 1.07 Appendix Ai at pages 10 and 12 (pdf page 14/54 and page 16/54))
8 Matter 357, Transcript, May 12, 2020, at page 220, 221 and 226, respectively.
9 As stated by Dr. Faruqui during the presentation: Transcript, May
12, 2020, at page 256, in Matter 357. During the presentation, Board
Member, Patrick Ervin asked a question of Dr. Faruqui regarding
whether seasonal rates would be a first step toward respective [sic]
rate designs, to which Dr. Faruqui replied “yes”: Transcript, May 12,
2020, at page 255.
10 Transcript at p. 64.
11 Exhibit JDI3.01, in Matter 271, at p 9. Drazen further outlines
other Canadian jurisdictions that recognize monthly variations in fuel
and purchased power costs at p 9-10.
41. The issue of proper cost allocation should be a top priority in
setting rates “in concept”, to ensure cost allocation is properly
addressed at an early stage of the process. An updated CCAS is
fundamental to future rate proceedings, and variance account matters.
The timing to consider seasonality is now.
Adding Seasonality to the Scope of the Matter is not Procedurally Unfair
42. Seasonality is one of the cost allocation topics, which have been
part of the conversation on rate design for years. Continuing the
conversation now is reasonable and fair.
43. In regards to the current procedural schedule in this proceeding,
it appears that the schedule should be able to be maintained if the
scope of the proceeding is widened to include the issue of seasonal
cost allocation. The Board has permitted the parties to ask
interrogatories on this topic, and other topics relating to cost
allocation methodology. There were no restrictions imposed on the
second round of interrogatories either. Intervenors have until April
25, 2023 to file evidence in this proceeding, and NB Power, along with
other intervenors, are given the opportunity to ask interrogatories
and submit rebuttal evidence in advance of the scheduled hearing.
44. However, if any party raises concerns that the issue cannot be
accommodated within the existing timetable, then JDI is open to
amending the current schedule. An adjustment to the schedule, in and
of itself, should not be sufficient grounds to exclude consideration
of seasonality from the issues in this Matter.
45. Seasonal cost allocation and rate design have been ongoing issues
since 2014 – almost nine years – and even in this application, NB
Power does not contemplate that changes will be effected immediately.
Its proposals are, in large part, conceptual and phased. Rate design
is not a matter to be rushed. There is no legislated deadline
requiring the matter to be concluded by a certain date.
46. JDI submits that seasonal cost allocation is a component of rate
design that should be addressed within this Matter. If there are rate
designs which NB Power wishes to advance that reflect seasonal cost
allocation, having an accurate CCAS will assist it in doing so – and,
moreover, may incent NB Power to bring forward such designs in a
timely way as per the Board’s directions back in 2016.
47. It is further worth noting that in accordance with the relatively
recent amendments to the Electricity Act, SNB 2013, c 7 at s. 103, NB
Power is now permitted to file for rates for three consecutive fiscal
years. In the fall of 2023, NB Power could apply to set rates until
2026. If the issue of proper cost allocation is not taken into
consideration, and set in this proceeding, rates could potentially be
set on an outdated, possibly inequitable cost allocation methodology
for the next three years. Having an accurate CCAS is important for
setting just and reasonable rates more broadly.
48. Alternatively, if the Board is not prepared to address the issue
of seasonal cost allocation by potentially updating the CCAS within
this Matter, JDI seeks the Board’s direction on an alternative
proceeding in which this issue, and other issues relating to cost
allocation, be addressed in a separate CCAS application, with a tariff
development process by a date certain.
JDI intends to introduce the following evidence in support of the motion:
1. Report of Patrick Bowman dated April 11, 2023, attached to this
Notice of Motion.
Dated the 11th day of April, 2023.
Stewart McKelvey Solicitors for J.D. Irving, Limited
Nancy G. Rubin, K.C.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 2:49 PM David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: Matter 552 - NB Power 2024-2025 And Games People Play
To: <chairperson@nbcpd.org>, <JohnFurey@fureylegal.com>, <Dave.Young@nbeub.ca>, <dmadsen.consulting@gmail.com>, <pierreroy@edmundston.ca>, <ray.robinson@sjenergy.com>, <dan.dionne@perth-andover.com>, <dg@edmundston.ca>, <DaMurphy@nbpower.com>, <len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>, <LClark@nbpower.com>, <John.Herron@gnb.ca>, <Don.Monahan@legnb.ca>, <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, <Rob.Weir@gnb.ca>, <Ian.Lee@legnb.ca>, <Kris.Austin@legnb.ca>, <NBPRegulatory@nbpower.com>, <Ron.marcolin@cme-mec.ca>, <louis-philippe.gauthier@cfib.ca>, <jeff.garrett@sjenergy.com>, <shelley.wood@sjenergy.com>
Cc: <premier@gnb.ca>, <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, <Rene.Legacy@gnb.ca>, <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, <Bill.Oliver@gnb.ca>, <John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, <Alain.Chiasson2@gnb.ca>, <Melissa.Curran@nbeub.ca>
NEW BRUNSWICK ENERGY AND UTILITIES BOARD
INTERROGATORY
Round 2
(Rule 4.2)
In Relation to an Application by: New Brunswick Power Corporation
In Accordance with: New Brunswick Power Corporation (“NB
Power”) 2022 Rate Design Application
TO: New Brunswick Power Corporation (“NBP”)
FROM: David Raymond Amos
NBP (David Raymond Amos) IR-1 March 23, 2023
Question:
Whereas NB Power filed
NBPO1.47 (pages 56 though to 62 in particular)
and
NBPO1.49 (pages 51 though to 118 in particular)
Hence NB Power must know who the auditors working for KPMG were and
how much did they billed NB Power for their work. So I am asking who
are they and how much did they charge?
NBP (David Raymond Amos) IR-2 March 23, 2023
Reference:
https://www.nbpower.com/en/abo
NB Power Announces Leadership Changes and Corporate Transformation
2022-07-04
FREDERICTON, N.B. – The New Brunswick Power Corporation Board of
Directors today announced that President and CEO Keith Cronkhite is
stepping down from his role and Lori Clark, Senior Vice President
Operations, has been appointed Acting President and CEO.
“Keith is a high-calibre executive with a long track record of
leadership within NB Power and we are grateful for his service,
including his steady hand during the pandemic and his recent
stewardship to modernize the Electricity Act,” says Chair of the Board
of Directors, Charles V. Firlotte. “However, as we look to the future
we are facing unprecedented challenges with a global energy crisis
that is adding more cost pressure and exacerbating already excessive
debt levels; pressing federal regulations for the phasing out of
fossil fuels; and a need to support New Brunswickers with the rapid
adoption of greener energy solutions. As such, the Board has concluded
we must embark on a significant transformation of the organization.”
The Board has retained Price Waterhouse Canada to lead a strategic
review which will include identifying immediate ways to optimize the
current cost structure and meet debt obligations, as well as
identifying alternative solutions to meet New Brunswickers’ power
needs in a cost competitive, reliable and environmentally sustainable
way.
The Board is initiating an executive search for a President and CEO.
This process is expected to take several months. As Acting President
and CEO, Ms. Clark brings extensive experience leading key functions
within NB Power including Controller, Vice President of Regulatory
Affairs and Strategic Initiatives, and most recently Senior Vice
President Operations. She is also a Chartered Professional Accountant
who has studied nuclear technology at MIT and leadership at Wharton
Business School.
“We are in good hands as we embark on this change, and I am confident
Keith and Lori will ensure a seamless transition for our customers,
employees and partners. As we enter this transformation phase there
will be challenges and opportunities, particularly in light of the
global landscape which is adding pressure for all New Brunswickers.
The time is now for us to evolve, with urgency, to ensure that NB
Power is able to deliver reasonable and competitive pricing, as well
as clean energy for future generations,” says Mr. Firlotte.
MEDIA CONTACT: Marc Belliveau, NB Power Communications,
mbelliveau@nbpower.com, 506 458-4203
Question: Who are the people within Price Waterhouse Canada are
advising NB Power and how much are they billing for their services?
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, May 4, 2023 at 2:40 PM
Subject: Fwd: Matter 529 - NB Power Rate Design I did not receive a notice of motion from the JDI lawyers or anyone else
To: Kim.Embleton <Kim.Embleton@gnb.ca>
From: Chiasson, Alain (OAG/CPG) <Alain.Chiasson2@gnb.ca>
Date: Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 3:17 PM
Subject: RE: Matter 529 - NB Power Rate Design I did not receive a notice of motion from the JDI lawyers or anyone else
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Hello David,
I can be reached at 506-724-0934 if you wish to speak with me.
Cheers,
Alain Chiasson, Public Intervener
-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 14:52:20 -0300
Subject: Re: Matter 529 - NB Power Rate Design I did not receive a
notice of motion from the JDI lawyers or anyone else
To: "Mitchell, Kathleen" <Kathleen.Mitchell@nbeub.ca>
Cc: "Chiasson, Alain (OAG/CPG)" <Alain.Chiasson2@gnb.ca>,
"rdk@indecon.com" <rdk@indecon.com>, "ceo@fermenbfarm.ca"
<ceo@fermenbfarm.ca>, "louis-philippe.gauthier@cfib.
<louis-philippe.gauthier@cfib.
<frederic.gionet@cfib.ca>, "Ron.marcolin@cme-mec.ca"
<Ron.marcolin@cme-mec.ca>, "Sollows, David (DNRED/MRNDE)"
<David.Sollows@gnb.ca>, "hanrahan.dion@jdirving.com"
<hanrahan.dion@jdirving.com>, "nrubin@stewartmckelvey.com"
<nrubin@stewartmckelvey.com>, "coneil@stewartmckelvey.com"
<coneil@stewartmckelvey.com>, "lmclements@stewartmckelvey.co
<lmclements@stewartmckelvey.co
<pbowman@bowmaneconomics.ca>, "brudderham@stewartmckelvey.co
<brudderham@stewartmckelvey.co
<JohnFurey@fureylegal.com>, "jpetrie@nbpower.com"
<jpetrie@nbpower.com>, "NBPRegulatory@nbpower.com"
<NBPRegulatory@nbpower.com>, "lgordon@nbpower.com"
<lgordon@nbpower.com>, "SWaycott@nbpower.com" <SWaycott@nbpower.com>,
"George.Porter@nbpower.com" <George.Porter@nbpower.com>,
"bcrawford@nbpower.com" <bcrawford@nbpower.com>, Veronique Otis
<Veronique.Otis@nbeub.ca>, "Young, Dave" <Dave.Young@nbeub.ca>,
"Aherrington@lawsoncreamer.com
Melissa Curran <Melissa.Curran@nbeub.ca>,
"bhavumaki@synapse-energy.com" <bhavumaki@synapse-energy.com>
"mwhited@synapse-energy.com" <mwhited@synapse-energy.com>,
"prhodes@synapse-energy.com" <prhodes@synapse-energy.com>,
"alawton@synapse-energy.com" <alawton@synapse-energy.com>,
"jwilson@resourceinsight.com" <jwilson@resourceinsight.com>,
"pchernick@resourceinsight.com
"tammy.grieve@mcinnescooper.co
"paul.black@twinriverspaper.co
"Hoyt, Len" <len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>,
"tyler.rajeski@twinriverspaper
<tyler.rajeski@twinriverspaper
"darcy.ouellette@twinriverspap
<darcy.ouellette@twinriverspap
<dan.murphy@umnb.ca>, "jeff.garrett@sjenergy.com"
<jeff.garrett@sjenergy.com>, "shelley.wood@sjenergy.com"
<shelley.wood@sjenergy.com>, "dan.dionne@perth-andover.com"
<dan.dionne@perth-andover.com>
<pierreroy@edmundston.ca>, "ryan.mitchell@sjenergy.com"
<ryan.mitchell@sjenergy.com>, "sstoll@stollprofcorp.com"
<sstoll@stollprofcorp.com>, "pzarnett@bdrenergy.com"
<pzarnett@bdrenergy.com>
Perhaps Mr. Chiasson should call me
On 4/13/23, Mitchell, Kathleen <Kathleen.Mitchell@nbeub.ca> wrote:
> Good morning Mr. Chiasson,
>
> The motion tomorrow and the motion on Tuesday are both scheduled to begin at
> 9:30 a.m. Both motions will be held via Zoom. The links will be circulated
> prior to both motions.
>
>
> Kathleen Mitchell
> Chief Clerk / Greffière en chef
> (506) 658-2504 (General/Général)
> (506) 643-7324 (Direct/Directe)
> [Text Description automatically generated]
> Confidentiality Notice
> This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
> It must not be forwarded unless permission has been received from the
> sender. Disclosure to anyone other than the intended recipient does not
> constitute a waiver of privilege. If you have received this message
> inadvertently, please notify the sender, delete the message and then delete
> your response. Thank you.
> Avis de confidentialité
> Ce message ainsi que tout fichier qui pourrait l’accompagner sont
> confidentiels et destinés uniquement à l'usage de la personne ou de l'entité
> à laquelle ils sont adressés. Il ne doit pas être réacheminé sans la
> permission de l'expéditeur. La divulgation à toute personne autre que le
> destinataire prévu ne constitue pas une renonciation au privilège. Si vous
> avez reçu ce message par inadvertance, veuillez en informer l'expéditeur,
> supprimer le message, puis votre réponse. Merci.
>
>
> From: Chiasson, Alain (OAG/CPG) <Alain.Chiasson2@gnb.ca>
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2023 9:33 AM
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
> <Kathleen.Mitchell@nbeub.ca>; rdk@indecon.com
> Cc: ceo@fermenbfarm.ca; louis-philippe.gauthier@cfib.c
> frederic.gionet@cfib.ca; Ron.marcolin@cme-mec.ca; Sollows, David
> (DNRED/MRNDE) <David.Sollows@gnb.ca>; hanrahan.dion@jdirving.com;
> nrubin@stewartmckelvey.com; coneil@stewartmckelvey.com;
> lmclements@stewartmckelvey.com
> brudderham@stewartmckelvey.com
> jpetrie@nbpower.com; NBPRegulatory@nbpower.com; lgordon@nbpower.com;
> SWaycott@nbpower.com; George.Porter@nbpower.com; bcrawford@nbpower.com;
> Veronique Otis <Veronique.Otis@nbeub.ca>; Young, Dave <Dave.Young@nbeub.ca>;
> Aherrington@lawsoncreamer.com; Melissa Curran <Melissa.Curran@nbeub.ca>;
> bhavumaki@synapse-energy.com; mwhited@synapse-energy.com;
> prhodes@synapse-energy.com; alawton@synapse-energy.com;
> jwilson@resourceinsight.com; pchernick@resourceinsight.com; rdk@indecon.com;
> tammy.grieve@mcinnescooper.com
> <len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>; tyler.rajeski@twinriverspaper.
> darcy.ouellette@twinriverspape
> jeff.garrett@sjenergy.com; shelley.wood@sjenergy.com;
> dan.dionne@perth-andover.com; pierreroy@edmundston.ca;
> ryan.mitchell@sjenergy.com; sstoll@stollprofcorp.com;
> pzarnett@bdrenergy.com
> Subject: RE: Matter 529 - NB Power Rate Design I did not receive a notice of
> motion from the JDI lawyers or anyone else
>
> Hello,
>
> My name is Alain Chiasson and I am the new Public Intervener at the New
> Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board. I can be reached at
> alain.chiasson2@gnb.ca<mailto:
>
> I am available for discussion later today except between 1:30 pm to 3:pm
> this afternoon. I can make myself available for these motions tomorrow and
> on Tuesday, April 18, 2023 for the two motions.
>
> Can you please confirm the dates and times of the two motions please?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Alain Chiasson
>
>
> From: Alain Chiasson <jmachiasson@gmail.com<mailto:
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2023 8:15 AM
> To: Chiasson, Alain (OAG/CPG)
> <Alain.Chiasson2@gnb.ca<mailto
> Subject: Fwd: Matter 529 - NB Power Rate Design I did not receive a notice
> of motion from the JDI lawyers or anyone else
>
>
> ATTENTION! External email / courriel externe.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: David Amos
> <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
> Date: Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:55 PM
> Subject: Re: Matter 529 - NB Power Rate Design I did not receive a notice of
> motion from the JDI lawyers or anyone else
> To: Mitchell, Kathleen
> <Kathleen.Mitchell@nbeub.ca<ma
> Cc: ceo@fermenbfarm.ca<mailto:ceo@
> <ceo@fermenbfarm.ca<mailto:ceo
> louis-philippe.gauthier@cfib.c
> <louis-philippe.gauthier@cfib.
> frederic.gionet@cfib.ca<mailto
> <frederic.gionet@cfib.ca<mailt
> Ron.marcolin@cme-mec.ca<mailto
> <Ron.marcolin@cme-mec.ca<mailt
> david.sollows@gnb.ca<mailto:da
> <david.sollows@gnb.ca<mailto:d
> hanrahan.dion@jdirving.com<mai
> <hanrahan.dion@jdirving.com<ma
> nrubin@stewartmckelvey.com<mai
> <nrubin@stewartmckelvey.com<ma
> coneil@stewartmckelvey.com<mai
> <coneil@stewartmckelvey.com<ma
> lmclements@stewartmckelvey.com
> <lmclements@stewartmckelvey.co
> pbowman@bowmaneconomics.ca<mai
> <pbowman@bowmaneconomics.ca<ma
> brudderham@stewartmckelvey.com
> <brudderham@stewartmckelvey.co
> JohnFurey@fureylegal.com<mailt
> <JohnFurey@fureylegal.com<mail
> jpetrie@nbpower.com<mailto:jpe
> <jpetrie@nbpower.com<mailto:jp
> NBPRegulatory@nbpower.com<mail
> <NBPRegulatory@nbpower.com<mai
> lgordon@nbpower.com<mailto:lgo
> <lgordon@nbpower.com<mailto:lg
> SWaycott@nbpower.com<mailto:SW
> <SWaycott@nbpower.com<mailto:S
> George.Porter@nbpower.com<mail
> <George.Porter@nbpower.com<mai
> bcrawford@nbpower.com<mailto:b
> <bcrawford@nbpower.com<mailto:
> <Veronique.Otis@nbeub.ca<mailt
> <Dave.Young@nbeub.ca<mailto:Da
> Aherrington@lawsoncreamer.com<
> <Aherrington@lawsoncreamer.com
> NBEUB/CESPNB <General@nbeub.ca<mailto:Gener
> <Susan.Colwell@nbeub.ca<mailto
> bhavumaki@synapse-energy.com<m
> <bhavumaki@synapse-energy.com<
> mwhited@synapse-energy.com<mai
> <mwhited@synapse-energy.com<ma
> prhodes@synapse-energy.com<mai
> <prhodes@synapse-energy.com<ma
> alawton@synapse-energy.com<mai
> <alawton@synapse-energy.com<ma
> jwilson@resourceinsight.com<ma
> <jwilson@resourceinsight.com<m
> pchernick@resourceinsight.com<
> <pchernick@resourceinsight.com
> Melissa Curran <Melissa.Curran@nbeub.ca<mailt
> jmachiasson@gmail.com<mailto:j
> <jmachiasson@gmail.com<mailto:
> rdk@indecon.com<mailto:rdk@ind
> <rdk@indecon.com<mailto:rdk@in
> tammy.grieve@mcinnescooper.com
> <tammy.grieve@mcinnescooper.co
> paul.black@twinriverspaper.com
> <paul.black@twinriverspaper.co
> Hoyt, Len <len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com<ma
> tyler.rajeski@twinriverspaper.
> <tyler.rajeski@twinriverspaper
> darcy.ouellette@twinriverspape
> <darcy.ouellette@twinriverspap
> dan.murphy@umnb.ca<mailto:dan.
> <dan.murphy@umnb.ca<mailto:dan
> jeff.garrett@sjenergy.com<mail
> <jeff.garrett@sjenergy.com<mai
> shelley.wood@sjenergy.com<mail
> <shelley.wood@sjenergy.com<mai
> dan.dionne@perth-andover.com<m
> <dan.dionne@perth-andover.com<
> pierreroy@edmundston.ca<mailto
> <pierreroy@edmundston.ca<mailt
> ryan.mitchell@sjenergy.com<mai
> <ryan.mitchell@sjenergy.com<ma
> sstoll@stollprofcorp.com<mailt
> <sstoll@stollprofcorp.com<mail
> pzarnett@bdrenergy.com<mailto:
> <pzarnett@bdrenergy.com<mailto
>
>
> On 4/12/23, Mitchell, Kathleen
> <Kathleen.Mitchell@nbeub.ca<ma
>>
>> Good morning,
>>
>> Please find attached a letter from the New Brunswick Energy and Utilities
>> Board in relation to the above noted Matter.
>>
>>
>> Bonjour,
>>
>> S'il vous plait trouver ci-joint une lettre de la Commission de l'énergie
>> et
>> des services publics du Nouveau-Brunswick ayant trait à l'instance
>> susmentionnée.
>>
>>
>>
>> Kathleen Mitchell
>> Chief Clerk / Greffière en chef
>> (506) 658-2504 (General/Général)
>> (506) 643-7324 (Direct/Directe)
>> [Text Description automatically generated]
>> Confidentiality Notice
>> This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
>> intended
>> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
>> addressed.
>> It must not be forwarded unless permission has been received from the
>> sender. Disclosure to anyone other than the intended recipient does not
>> constitute a waiver of privilege. If you have received this message
>> inadvertently, please notify the sender, delete the message and then
>> delete
>> your response. Thank you.
>> Avis de confidentialité
>> Ce message ainsi que tout fichier qui pourrait l'accompagner sont
>> confidentiels et destinés uniquement à l'usage de la personne ou de
>> l'entité
>> à laquelle ils sont adressés. Il ne doit pas être réacheminé sans la
>> permission de l'expéditeur. La divulgation à toute personne autre que le
>> destinataire prévu ne constitue pas une renonciation au privilège. Si
>> vous
>> avez reçu ce message par inadvertance, veuillez en informer l'expéditeur,
>> supprimer le message, puis votre réponse. Merci.
>>
>>
>>
>
Date: Sun, Mar 15, 2026 at 8:14 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: Matter 552 - NB Power 2024-2025 And Games People Play
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. office. We appreciate the time you took to get in touch with our office.
If you did not already, please ensure to include your full contact details on your email and the appropriate staff will be able to action your request. We strive to ensure all constituent correspondence is responded to in a timely manner.
If your question or concern is time sensitive, please call our office: 506-832-4200.
Again, we thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts and concerns.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
Office of the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P.
Member of Parliament for Fundy Royal
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Mar 15, 2026 at 8:07 PM
Subject: Fwd: Matter 552 - NB Power 2024-2025 And Games People Play
To: <chairperson@nbcpd.org>, <JohnFurey@fureylegal.com>, <Dave.Young@nbeub.ca>, <dmadsen.consulting@gmail.com>, <pierreroy@edmundston.ca>, <ray.robinson@sjenergy.com>, <dan.dionne@perth-andover.com>, <dg@edmundston.ca>, <DaMurphy@nbpower.com>, <len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>, <LClark@nbpower.com>, <John.Herron@gnb.ca>, <Don.Monahan@legnb.ca>, <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, <Rob.Weir@gnb.ca>, <Ian.Lee@legnb.ca>, <Kris.Austin@legnb.ca>, <NBPRegulatory@nbpower.com>, <Ron.marcolin@cme-mec.ca>, <louis-philippe.gauthier@cfib.ca>
Cc: <premier@gnb.ca>, <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, <Rene.Legacy@gnb.ca>, <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, <Bill.Oliver@gnb.ca>, <John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>
It won't be going viral, but N.B. Power's rate hearing is online, start to finish
Live viewership rarely exceeds 50 but EUB wants its proceedings to be more accessible
N.B. Power's two-week rate hearing underway in Fredericton is not exactly gripping television, but for the first time, the New Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board has been streaming the proceeding and posting the daily seven-hour videos on YouTube.
Live viewership of the detailed examination of N.B. Power's request to raise its rates 4.75 per cent rarely exceeds 50 people during the day but the effort is part of a plan by the regulator to make its work more accessible to the public.
The regulator has been dabbling in "webcasting" for the past year in what it calls part of its mandate to "provide transparent and open processes."
Over the first four days of the hearing, it has posted 30 hours of content.
"The Board remains committed to promoting a greater understanding of its processes and the evidence presented in the matters which come before it," EUB chair Christopher Stewart wrote of the video initiative in the board's most recent annual report.
The EUB is already one of New Brunswick's most open government tribunals.
Shelley
Petit, on monitor, is with the New Brunswick Coalition of Persons with
Disabilities and has been questioning N.B. Power witnesses from her
home. (Roger Cosman/CBC)It hosts an enormous document storage site that contains for public viewing — with some confidential exceptions — all of the evidence submitted in every case it has dealt with for the past 15 years.
It also posts online transcripts and decisions in cases that stretch back to the early 1990s.
In addition, the board has a tradition of welcoming ordinary citizens to participate in even major proceedings, giving them time and status equal to that of lawyers flown in to represent the province's largest industrial interests.
A regular participant in recent hearings has been Shelley Petit with the New Brunswick Coalition of Persons with Disabilities.
Five
N.B. Power managers covering a variety of specialties from human
resources to IT testified as a group at N.B. Power's rate hearing on
Thursday. (Youtube)Petit has been questioning witnesses in N.B. Power's current rate hearing live from home, spending more than an hour grilling N.B. Power senior vice-president Darren Murphy and chief financial officer Justin Urquhart on day one.
On day three, when Petit was in danger of missing her turn to question one panel of witnesses because of a medical appointment, Stewart pledged to rearrange matters so that wouldn't happen.
"If you're not [here] then before we're done, we'll circle back to you , or when we know you're back, we'll circle back to you, and we'll just deal with it in that fashion as we go," Stewart said to Petit about not losing her turn.
MR. BURGOYNE: Okay. Ms. Curran, if you report — go to NB Power 9.60. I believe it's at page 23. It's IR response 11.
few years back, I will say. So that would have been the last comprehensive piece.
MR. BURGOYNE: And is that your way of saying that NB Power would be open to tracking some of those budgetary cuts and comments that are made during this iterative review process for base OM&A in the future, if it was something the Board thought would — or the Interveners thought would be helpful?
New Brunswick utilities board rejects April 1 power rate increase
N.B. Power has itself to blame for a delays at its rate hearing, board rules
A proposed 4.75 per cent increase in electricity prices that N.B. Power was hoping to impose on customers April 1 will instead be delayed until June or, potentially, July.
In a ruling Monday, the New Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board found that a five-week delay in starting N.B. Power's rate hearing is the utility's own fault and it will have to bear the consequences.
"The delay was caused by factors within N.B. Power's control," EUB chair Christopher Stewart said at the opening of the rescheduled rate hearing Monday morning
"An interim rate order is an extraordinary remedy and it is not intended to shield utilities from the known or reasonably foreseeable consequences of their own business decisions. For these reasons the board concludes it is not advisable to grant NB Power's interim relief request."
A
hearing into N.B. Power's request to raise rates 4.75 per cent finally
got underway in Fredericton on Monday, five weeks later than originally
scheduled. (Roger Cosman/CBC)N.B. Power applied for a rate increase in October and after months of submitting evidence to the EUB and answering questions from interested parties in support of the application, the utility was supposed to formally present its case to the board in early February.
However, the utility also asked for an expedited hearing into its plans to have a new natural gas generating station built in Tantramar. That matter forced a five-week delay in the start of the rate hearing.
The EUB normally requires several weeks to review the evidence presented as part of a rate request. When the current hearing concludes in late March, the board will be unable to deliver a decision by April 1 on whether to approve the 4.75 per cent increase.
That led N.B. Power to apply for an interim increase on customers that would begin in April but promised to rebate to customers in whole or in part later if the board eventually ruled the full amount was not justified.
Christopher
Stewart, chair of the New Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board,
delivered the decision rejecting N.B. Power's request for an interim
rate increase starting April 1. (Roger Cosman/CBC)In the first item of business to open the rate hearing, the EUB said no to that request even though it acknowledged the decision will cost N.B. Power millions of dollars.
Stewart said a decision from the EUB on the rate increase application is not likely to be ready for implementation until June 1, with a "reasonable possibility" it could take until July 1.
In a statement, N.B. Power said it was "disappointed" by the EUB's decision but "respects the important role of the regulator."
N.B. Power estimates it will lose, and customers will save, $22.4 million with a July 1 rate increase compared to one that begins April 1.
Hearing Day 2 - Matter EL-003-2025

Powering clean energy and cancer care – Laurentis Energy Partners
September 2025 – A conversation with Laurentis Energy Partners.
When most people think of nuclear, they think of the Point Lepreau Generating Station on the Bay of Fundy. But nuclear in this province goes far beyond generating electricity; advancing new reactor designs, creating opportunities for local workers, and unlocking the potential to produce isotopes used in cancer treatment.
To learn more, Atlantica sat down with Chris Dixon, Vice-President of Nuclear for Laurentis Energy Partners, and Mark McDermott, Senior Manager of Operations in Saint John. Between them, they bring decades of experience with Point Lepreau and Ontario’s CANDU reactors, and a passion for what nuclear can do for Atlantic Canada.
Where are you talking from today, and what’s your role at Laurentis?
Chris Dixon: “I’m in Toronto. I completed my education in nuclear physics at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, over 30 years ago. I’ve worked as a health physicist, but most of my career was spent as a nuclear operator. I was a licensed Shift Manager at Pickering, then an Assistant Operations Manager at all three of OPG’s nuclear generating stations [Pickering 014, Pickering 058, and Darlington]. Later, I was an Operations Director for a new nuclear startup looking to develop Generation IV micro modular reactor technology with an aim to provide clean and safe power for Canada’s far North. I joined Laurentis just over a year ago, and now I get to apply my operations knowledge on a bigger, international scale.”
Mark McDermott: “I’m in Saint John. I graduated from UNB Fredericton almost 40 years ago and spent 25 years at NB Power’s Point Lepreau Generating Station, in roles from turbine-generator supervisor to design authority, and got my 25-year gold watch. After retiring, I consulted for a year, then joined Laurentis 15 months ago. Now I manage operations in our Saint John office, where we have eight employees.”

Mark McDermott
Senior Manager of Operations, Saint John, LEP
For those unfamiliar, what is Laurentis Energy Partners (Laurentis)?
Chris Dixon: “We’re a subsidiary of Ontario Power Generation, with offices in New Brunswick, Ontario, and Romania. We cover the full nuclear life cycle: design and engineering, maintenance, waste management, and decommissioning, and we produce critical medical isotopes used in cancer diagnosis and treatment and rare non-medical isotopes used in industrial applications and research.”
“We’re strong in CANDU, but we’re technology agnostic – we’ll support small modular reactors and micro-reactors too. Our job is to help people move off fossil fuels and into clean, reliable, low-carbon nuclear power.”

Chris Dixon
Vice-President of Nuclear, LEP
What projects is Laurentis working on now in New Brunswick?
Mark McDermott: “We have a 10-year reactor maintenance agreement [with NB Power]. We provide inspections, fuel channel replacement, and radiation protection services – supplying teams of 50 or 60 local tradespeople during outages, and sometimes up to 90.”
“We opened an office in Saint John in 2019. About 25% of the work from our Saint John team supports New Brunswick, while 75% supports projects elsewhere, including Europe. We’re also providing the engineering work required for the future Laurentis Health and Innovation Centre in Hamilton, Ontario, where isotopes will be processed for cancer care.”
What other significant projects is Laurentis working on in Canada?
Chris Dixon: “At OPG’s Darlington, we’ve installed a first-of-its-kind Target Delivery System in partnership with BWXT Medical. It’s the largest isotope irradiation system in North America and it produces medical isotopes in a large reactor at an industrial scale, something research reactors have been doing historically but on a much smaller scale. We’re also planning to install a second system for redundancy and increased supply to meet the enormous global demand for medical grade radioisotopes in addition to Ontario’s goal of doubling its medical isotope production capacity by 2030.”
“Laurentis provides radiation protection services and health physics across Canada, and supports station maintenance at Point Lepreau and other CANDU sites around the world. We’re also working with clients in Alberta and Saskatchewan on new small modular reactors. And internationally, we’re active in Romania, providing Project Management Organization services for the Cernavoda Unit 1 refurbishment project; and in Poland, and Estonia, supporting SMR development.”
Laurentis helps produce medical isotopes used to fight cancer. What are they, and why does this matter?
Chris Dixon: “Each one of us has been touched by cancer in some way. Isotopes are a powerful way to diagnose or treat it. Being part of a solution that helps people live longer, healthier lives is enormously meaningful on a personal and societal level. At Darlington, Laurentis, using its Target Delivery System, is or will soon be producing:
- Molybdenum-99 (Mo-99): widely used globally for diagnostic imaging for heart health and cancer detection. It’s used in over 40 million procedures each year. After the NRU closed in 2018, Canada had to rely on imports of Mo-99. We’re proud to be able to produce this in in a much larger volume than has been done before, creating a reliable, North American supply for patients in need.
- Yttrium-90 (Y-90): primarily used to target liver cancer with tiny radiation beads, or beta emitters as we call them. It’s like brachytherapy and is pressed against the cancer cell itself, thereby targeting cancer cells directly without harming healthy cells.
- Lutetium-177 (Lu-177): is considered one of the most promising isotopes in radiotheranostics. It helps treat prostate, breast, and neuroendocrine cancers, binding to tumours and destroying them while sparing healthy tissue. This specific isotope has enormous potential to save lives and we’re quite excited about being at the forefront, helping to ensure a reliable, high-capacity supply.”
How do you make sure isotope production is safe and reliable?
Chris Dixon: “When you build a Target Delivery System, it goes through years of design, regulatory compliance, and production testing. Medical isotopes have to meet the strictest standards from regulators like the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, Health Canada, and the U.S. FDA. We spend months running operations to prove safety, operational reliability, and medical-grade quality. Nothing moves forward until we’ve proven it’s safe and reliable for operations and safe for patients.”
Could you tell us about some other non-energy benefits of nuclear?
Chris Dixon: “One of the biggest is isotopes. I already mentioned Mo-99, Y-90 and Lu-177, but Ontario Power Generation also produces cobalt-60, used worldwide to sterilize medical supplies. Tritium, a by-product of nuclear power, decays into helium-3, which is also extremely rare and valuable. Micro modular reactors can also heat homes and greenhouses in northern communities, giving them energy security and food security. And the nuclear sector drives high-skilled jobs, innovation, and global exports in technology and isotopes. Nuclear really does bring benefits to health, the economy, and the environment.”
Tritium gets mentioned often in public debates. What is it, and should people be worried?
Mark McDermott: “Tritium is a hydrogen isotope. It’s radioactive, so you manage and minimize it. It has a half-life of about 12.3 years, meaning that half of it will be non-radioactive after that time.”
Chris Dixon: “It’s very low-energy and always contained within dedicated station systems – never in public water. What people don’t realize is the benefits: tritium decays into helium-3, which is a stable (non-radioactive) and inert gas that is rare and incredibly useful for quantum computing, neutron research, border security, and medical imaging. Laurentis is actually the largest and only civilian source of helium-3 in the world. We extract the high-purity helium-3 from tritium stored at OPG’s Darlington Tritium Removal Facility using a custom-designed tool.”
What role is Laurentis playing in SMR projects?
Chris Dixon: “Small modular reactors (SMRs) are smaller, factory-built, and inherently safe. But they still go through the same regulatory checks as large reactors. At Laurentis, we share our operational and regulatory experience to help new companies navigate and succeed in achieving their goals through SMR development.”
“At the end of the day, we just want these projects to succeed so they can provide clean, safe, and carbon-free energy to communities. Playing a role in the Darlington New Nuclear Project, the first grid-scale SMR project in a G7 country to get regulatory approval, is a significant advantage for us and, therefore, our clients.”
Mark McDermott: “New Brunswick is uniquely positioned for SMRs in the future; we have Point Lepreau and UNB’s Advanced Nuclear Labs, and a strong industrial base. There’s a lot of opportunity here.”
Advanced Nuclear Reactors Laboratory
University of New Brunswick
Laurentis joined the New Brunswick Energy Cluster in 2024. What motivated this choice, and how are you contributing locally?
Mark McDermott: “Large projects need collaboration. No single firm can do it all. By joining the Cluster, we can partner with local companies that bring trades and construction expertise, while we provide engineering and project management.”
“Many of these companies are already working nationally, from Newfoundland refineries to LNG projects in Kitimat. They understand local conditions and bring decades of experience. Together, we can deliver expertise and experience here and export services beyond the province.”
How do you make sure projects are built with communities, not just in them?
Chris Dixon: “We hire locally as much as possible, but it’s not just about jobs. It’s about building lasting relationships. We need to work with local communities, including Indigenous communities and First Nations, to understand what matters to them and reflect those priorities in how projects are planned and delivered. It’s important that communities are active partners at the table.”
Mark McDermott: “Projects span decades. Local knowledge about geology, environment, and culture is critical. Sustainability depends on involving the community from the start.”
Some Atlantic Canadians are undecided about nuclear energy. What would you say to them?
Mark McDermott: “Nuclear has been operating in Canada for more than 50 years, 40 of those in New Brunswick. Any energy source needs respect and regulation, and nuclear is no different. The important thing is to focus on facts, not fear.”
Chris Dixon: : “Nuclear is one of the most strictly regulated industries in the world. When I was licensed, I was tested every five weeks in 20 to 30 simulations, just like airline pilots, to prove I could operate the reactors safely. We are fully dedicated to the safe operation of the facilities that we work in, at all levels of the organization, ensuring safety is always the top priority. Nuclear power is about more than electricity – it’s about health, innovation, and environmental responsibility. If people are nervous, I’d encourage them to ask questions. Those of us in the industry are strong believers in its safety and benefits, and are eager to talk about why we love what we do.”
Finally, what excites you most about New Brunswick’s role in clean energy?
Mark McDermott: “Point Lepreau was originally licensed for more than one reactor unit. With SMR development, UNB’s research, and a strong industrial base, we’re ready to grow. Belledune is also exploring a site. We have the experience and community acceptance to lead. The demand for engineers, technicians, and trades is probably greater now than it’s been since the 1980s.”
Chris Dixon: “New Brunswick is a nuclear powerhouse with a strong industry, great engineering schools and a talented workforce. With its geography and smaller communities, it’s the perfect place to innovate safely – SMRs, district heating, and renewables integration. It’s a chance to show Canada and the world how to transition off coal to clean energy. Laurentis wants to see the world transition away from fossil fuels. And we’re proud to be part of that vision in Atlantic Canada.”
Quick facts
- Employees: ~8 in Saint John; ~350 worldwide (growing toward 400).
- Isotopes produced: Mo-99 used for diagnostic imaging for heart and cancer detection, Y-90 used for targeted liver cancer therapy, and Lu-177, used for therapies for prostate, breast, and neuroendocrine cancers.
- Innovation: Installed the world’s first Target Delivery System at Darlington to produce isotopes at a commercial scale. This system is the largest isotope irradiation system in North America.
- Useful by-products: Largest civilian producer of helium-3 (from Tritium), used in quantum computing, border security, and medical imaging.
- SMRs: Supporting small modular reactor projects in Ontario, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Poland, and Estonia.
- Cluster role: Member of the New Brunswick Energy Cluster since 2024, partnering with local trades and firms.
Key terms explained
- CANDU reactor: A Canadian-designed nuclear power reactor that uses heavy water as a moderator.
- SMRs (Small Modular Reactors): A new class of smaller nuclear reactors (footprint and generation output), factory-built and inherently safer, flexible, and efficient than previous generations of nuclear reactors.
- Medical isotopes: Radioactive materials used in medicine to diagnose or treat diseases, including many types of cancer.
- Tritium: A radioactive form of hydrogen, managed carefully in nuclear plants.
- Helium-3: A rare isotope derived from tritium, used in quantum computing, neutron research, border security, and medical imaging.
- Cobalt-60: A radioactive isotope produced in reactors, widely used to sterilize medical equipment.
Quick links
From: Abigail J. Herrington <Aherrington@lawsoncreamer.com
Date: Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 2:52 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: Court of Appeal File No. 68-23-CA - Judicial Review of Board Decision in Matter 541
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
I am currently away from the office in hearings returning on July 12, 2023. As a result, my response to your email may be delayed. If you require urgent assistance, please contact Lauree Cole at 506-633-3503 or lcole@lawsoncreamer.com.
Sincerely,
Abigail
From: John Furey <JohnFurey@fureylegal.com>
Date: Sat, Mar 2, 2024 at 4:54 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: Matter 552 - NB Power 2024-2025 And Games People Play
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
I am in a hearing and away from my office until Tuesday, March 5, 2024, and will not have access to email during that time. If your matter requires immediate attention, please contact me directly at 506-444-1328.
From: Shelley Petit <chairperson@nbcpd.org>
Date: Thu, May 16, 2024 at 11:20 AM
Subject: Re: Matter 552 - NB Power 2024-2025 And Games People Play
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
From: John Furey <JohnFurey@fureylegal.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:31:03 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE Matter 552 - NB Power 2024-2025 Its
obvious Holland's minions in NB Power are pulling a fast one within
the EUB before Higgy has a writ dopped an Mikey is out a job
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
I am away from my office until Tuesday, February 20, 2024, and have
limited access to email. If your matter requires immediate attention,
please contact me directly at 506-444-1328.
https://davidraymondamos3.
Monday 5 February 2024
Games People Play
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
Delayed N.B. Power rate request promoted as a government achievement by PC Party
Premier Blaine Higgs personally credited with thwarting increase
despite ordering utility to shape up
Robert Jones · CBC News · Posted: Feb 08, 2024 6:00 AM AST
A man with grey hair and glasses addresses microphones in a hallyway.
New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs is being credited with his party
for thwarting part of a 9.25 per cent rate increase request by N.B.
Power, even though the utility was following instructions it got from
Higgs. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)
New Brunswick's Progressive Conservative Party is applauding the
possibility N.B. Power may not be able to raise electricity rates as
planned on April 1 even though that may cost the utility $32.6 million
in revenue it needs to reach financial targets set for it by the
Progressive Conservative government.
"Who would you rather see get the $32.6M? N.B. Power? Or N.B.
Families?" the PC party posted on its social media platforms Tuesday
about the potential for a delayed rate increase.
N.B. Power has applied for a 9.25 per cent increase that it says it
needs to begin on April 1, but a hearing by the New Brunswick Energy
and Utilities Board into that request isn't scheduled to start until
mid-May because it was submitted more than 10 weeks late.
That, N.B. Power fears, could push a decision on new rates from the
EUB out until July 1, which its lawyer John Furey has said the utility
cannot afford.
"Even in the most optimistic scenario in which the board is able to
render a partial decision which enables the implementation of rates by
July 1, 2024, N.B. Power will sustain a negative net impact of $32.636
million," Furey wrote in a submission to the EUB last week.
A facebook post In posts on X and Facebook, New
Brunswick's PC Party said Premier Blaine Higgs 'helped save
ratepayers"' by causing N.B. Power to file its rate increase request
72 days late. (PCNB / Facebook)
N.B. Power was operating under a directive from the EUB to file for
new rates by Oct. 4 to allow for the submission of evidence for and
against the proposal, a full hearing on that collected evidence and a
decision, prior to April 1.
However, on Sept. 25, nine days before that October filing deadline,
Premier Blaine Higgs signed a cabinet order extending debt targets
N.B. Power has to meet by two years, from March 2027 to March 2029.
That significantly lowered the amount of money the utility would need
for immediate debt reduction in the coming year and it upended five
months of budgeting at N.B. Power which then had to be reconstructed.
Eventually the rate request was filed on Dec. 15, 72 days late.
"The entire GRA (general rate application) filing package, which was
largely complete as of September 27, 2023, when the directive was
received, must be updated and/or revised to reflect that directive,"
N.B. Power's chief financial officer Darren Murphy said in an
affidavit explaining the delay to the board.
In its social media posts Tuesday the PC party credited Premier Blaine
Higgs personally for causing the delay in N.B. Power's application and
putting its April 1 increase in jeopardy.
A tweet Prominent PC candidate Faytene Grasseschi told followers that
the Higgs government 'chose families' when it slowed down N.B. Power's
application for new rates. (Faytene Grasseschi/ X)
Premier Blaine Higgs "and the PCNB Government helped save ratepayers
from at least some of N.B. Power's massive planned hike," it wrote.
Prominent PC candidate in the riding of Hampton-Fundy-St. Martins
Faytene Grasseschi amplified the post on her own platforms and
suggested that forcing a delay in N.B. Power's application had been
done by the premier and cabinet on purpose.
"The provincial (PCNB) government chose families," wrote Grasseschi.
However, the "massive planned hike" the PC party says Higgs interfered
with flows from instructions given to N.B. Power by Higgs in the first
place.
In its 300-page rate application, N.B. Power states it needs to
generate more than $1 billion in profit over the next five years to
meet financial targets it was given in the premier's Sept. 25
directive and that starts with a 9.25 per cent rate increase on April
1 and a second 9.25 per cent increase the following April.
"The Executive Council of the Government of New Brunswick directs N.B.
Power to make plans to achieve a capital structure of at least 20 per
cent equity by 2029," states the application.
A man wearing a suit standing in front of a brown building Natural
Resources and Energy Development Minister Mike Holland has expressed
concerns for several years about N.B. Power's financial condition and
has argued for less government interference in its affairs. (Jacques
Poitras/CBC)
"The requested [9.25 per cent] increases form the starting point for
achieving 20 per cent equity by March 31, 2029."
The Higgs government has insisted for several years N.B. Power needs
to improve its financial condition by reducing its high debt levels, a
position also taken by New Brunswick's last two auditors general.
Originally in December, Energy Minister Mike Holland said he wasn't
happy to see the large increase N.B. Power was asking for but said he
supported it taking action to get its finances in order.
"Nobody wants to see something like that, but it is a part of the
process of the utility properly putting together a rate increase
request," said Holland.
On Wednesday Holland's office did not return messages asking about the
PC Party posts crediting the government with slowing down N.B. Power's
application.
Doug Williams, executive director of the New Brunswick PC Party said
the post was made to counterbalance a CBC article on the issue
published last Monday that presented the delayed rate increase only as
a problem for N.B. Power, not a benefit to utility customers.
A building with NB Power written on it N.B. Power says it needs to
turn more than $1 billion in profit over five years to meet 2029
financial targets set for it by the Higgs government, starting with a
9.25 per cent increase this April. (Michael Heenan/CBC)
"The CBC article only chose to focus on "revenue loss" for N.B.
Power," wrote Williams in an email.
"PCNB wanted to provide balance to the discussion by highlighting that
changing the debt reduction dates for N.B. Power equals more money in
the pocket of New Brunswickers."
N.B. Power has applied to the EUB for a special interim rate increase
to take effect on April 1 that it says it can refund to customers in
whole or in part if the May hearing does not support what it has asked
for.
A similar request in 2016 was rejected by the board.
N.B. Power claims without an interim increase it will suffer $32.6
million in lost revenue in April, May and June that it cannot afford
to give up.
About half of that would be revenue from residential customers and
half from commercial and industrial customers.
The EUB will hear arguments on that application March 1.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Robert Jones
Reporter
Robert Jones has been a reporter and producer with CBC New Brunswick
since 1990. His investigative reports on petroleum pricing in New
Brunswick won several regional and national awards and led to the
adoption of price regulation in 2006.
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
139 Comments
David Amos
Why is it I am humming the old Joe South tune from my youth "Games
People Play"???
David Amos
Does anyone recall NB Power suing the EUB last year???
David Amos
Surprise Surprise Surprise
David Amos
Content Deactivated
Go Figure
New Brunswick Power Corporation
APPLICATION FOR INTERIM RATES
NOTICE
New Brunswick Power Corporation has filed a Notice of Motion with the
New Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board seeking an interim order as
follows:
1. Approving the schedule of rates for the 2024/25 fiscal year as set
out in Exhibit NBP 02.07 in Matter 552 which reflects differential
rates and an average 9.25 per cent increase to all customer classes,
effective from April 1, 2024 until further Order of the Board;
2. Directing NB Power to make billing adjustments for customers in the
event that final rates approved by the Board are different than rates
approved in the Interim Order, and further directing NB Power to keep
appropriate records to permit such adjustments;
3. Directions respecting the hearing of this Motion; and
4. Such further Orders and Directions as the Board may deem appropriate.
NB Power’s Notice of Motion and the supporting affidavit may be viewed
on the Board’s website at www.nbeub.ca under Matter No. 552.
As per Rule 4.3 of the Rules of Procedure, any party to this matter
who wishes to respond to the Motion must file and serve on all other
parties, a written response outlining the party’s position and the
grounds for same along with a specific indication of any evidence upon
which the party seeks to present or rely no later than Thursday,
February 8th at 4:00 p.m. (Atlantic Time).
David Amos
Content Deactivated
Reply to David Amos
NB Power is to file with the Board, and serve on all other parties,
its written argument in support of its motion, including copies of any
authorities upon which it intends to rely no later than Thursday,
February 15th at 4:00 p.m. (Atlantic Time).
Parties who have filed a written response to the Motion are to file
their written argument outlining their position in response to the
Motion, including copies of any authorities upon which they intend to
rely no later than Thursday, February 22nd at 4:00 p.m. (Atlantic
Time).
The Board will hold an in-person hearing on the Motion for Interim
Rates on Friday, March 1, 2024, beginning at 9:30 a.m. (Atlantic
Time). The location will be confirmed by the Board shortly.
New Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board
P.O. Box 5001
Suite 1400, 15 Market Square
Saint John, NB E2L 4Y9
Telephone: (506) 658-2504
Toll Free 1-866-766-2782
Fax: (506) 643-7300
E-Mail: general@nbeub.
David Amos
Reply to David Amos
As per Rule 4.3 of the Rules of Procedure, any party to this matter
who wishes to respond to the Motion must file and serve on all other
parties, a written response outlining the party’s position and the
grounds for same along with a specific indication of any evidence upon
which the party seeks to present or rely no later than Thursday,
February 8th at 4:00 p.m. (Atlantic Time).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Joe South - Games People Play (1969)
https://www.youtube.com/
Minister of Natural Resources and Energy Mike Holland rants of leaving
politics with Blogger!
Charles Leblanc
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Holland, Mike Hon. (ERD/DER)" <Mike.Holland@gnb.ca>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 19:33:51 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Mikey Holland and Johnny Green Does your
buddy Chucky Leblanc have the balls to ask Roger Brown about my 1965
Harley and the Yankee Wiretaps tapes in its saddlebag?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are
greatly valued. You can be assured that all emails and letters are
carefully read, reviewed and taken into consideration.
If your issue is Constituency related, please contact Cheryl Layton at
my constituency office in Albert at (506) 856-4961 or
Cheryl.Layton@gnb.ca.
Thanks again for your email!
Mike Holland
Minister
MLA, Albert
------------------------------
------------------------------ ------------------------------ --------------------------
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations. Nous
tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Si votre courriel est lié à un enjeu de circonscription, veuillez
contacter Cheryl Layton à mon bureau de circonscription dans Albert au
(506) 856-4961 ou Cheryl.Layton@gnb.ca.
Merci encore pour votre courriel!
Mike Holland
Ministre
Député, Albert
Hearing Day 3 - Matter EL-003-2025
Hearing Day 4 - Matter EL-003-2025
Hearing Day 5 - Matter EL-003-2025
NB Power doesn't want to 'burden' ratepayers in solving $4.9B debt problem: CEO
Lori Clark says while rate increases are “on the horizon,” there are other avenues the utility can look toward to pay down its roughly $4.9 billion in total debt.
She says the utility recently released a request for proposals in the sale of its downtown Fredericton head office, as well as another building it owns next door at 527 King St.
“We are in the business of generating, transmitting and distributing electricity and not necessarily in the building management business, so there may be others that can do it better,” Clark said in a recent interview with CTV News.
She says the utility is also working with PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) – a global consulting firm – on a cost-optimization review and will look at implementing the ideas the firm comes up with.
Clark, who is the former senior vice president of operations, was brought in after NB Power fired her predecessor, Keith Cronkhite, last July, in a move it says was motivated by a need for “significant transformation” due to the energy crisis and excessive debt.
“The utility does have a large debt on its balance sheet, rates are only one way of dealing with that,” said Clark.
“We know there are likely to be rate increases, but we certainly don’t want to burden our customers with rate increases anymore than they have to be.”
The higher costs faced by ratepayers, brought on by inflation, are the same things facing the utility, said Clark.
NB Power sought an 8.9 per cent rate increase across all customer classes based on a revenue requirement of about $2.3 billion. The utility wanted new rates to come into effect by April 1.
But in a partial decision released Thursday, the New Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board said it was “not satisfied that the rates, as applied for, are just and reasonable.”
“NB Power is directed to update its fuel and purchase power expense, load forecast, and revenue forecast,” the board said in its decision. It noted various other updates that also need to be made.
The utility now has to refile its 2023/2024 test year budget with several adjustments before the utility board will approve a rate increase.
Clark says NB Power -- a Crown Corporation -- knows it has to be as cost-effective as possible.
“The last thing we want to do is put this on the backs of our customers,” said Clark.
NB Power files for 8.9 per cent rate hike, government says it's not likely to intervene
NB Power has filed a general rate application with the New Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board - an 8.9 per cent increase.
"We recognize any rate increase is difficult for our customers,” said Lori Clark, the acting president and CEO of NB Power.
“NB Power has taken steps in ensuring the rate increase is as low as it can possibly be while the utility can continue to cover its services."
If approved, the rate will come into effect in April 2023 and will amount to roughly $16 a month, or about $200 a year for average residential customers.
Premier Blaine Higgs and Energy Minister Mike Holland say it's not likely the government will intervene.
"We have to look at the fact that governments have been criticized for meddling and being involved in NB Power's affairs over the years,” Holland said.
"I don't see that as a favourable approach because what has happened in the past where you know if we look back in history where we've put in rate freezes and you know, we've done things that haven't been the wises investment and they would be politically motivated,” said Higgs.
“That impacts the bottom like to rate payers and it affects the bottom line to the utility. So, how do we deal with that? We deal with it by trying to reduce the consumption and trying to go at that hard."
The Enhanced Energy Savings Program, a partnership between NB Power and the Department of Natural Resources and Energy Development, was opened to applicants last week.
"The programs that were recently announced are only going to reach five per cent of the target audience over the next three years. That's nothing," said David Coon, the leader of New Brunswick's Green Party. “Well it's something for those 2,000 people but it's kind of like a lottery."
Coon says the program should be funded up to $150-200 million a year.
He believes NB Power could lower costs by going with renewable energy.
"If we had a utility as we should in the future that is primarily powered by renewable sources of energy,” Coon said.
“Then you're dealing with free sources of energy which are eternal and your costs are all about harnessing that and storing it, rather than paying for fuel and importations."
NB Power described the proposed increase as a break-even budget.
"The 8.9 per cent is what we're applying to the EUB for. In future years, we were looking at what that rate increase needs to be so we do adequately address our debt situation and ensure that the utility is financially sound for the future,” Clark said.
The utility has accrued about $5 billon in debt. To tackle that in the following years, increases could be raised between two and 16 per cent.
"The next two tears on our application you will see there is debt reduction as a primary focus,” Clark said.
“We are focused on meeting debt equity targets of 80/20 by 2027 to prepare for Mactaquac expenditures and other capital expenditures we have in the future."
NB power plans to cut its operating costs by $50 million. That includes reducing its workforce.
President and CEO of NB Power steps down

The president and CEO of NB Power, Keith Cronkhite, is stepping down from his position.
The chair of the provincial crown corporation’s board says the move comes amid a need for “significant transformation” due to the energy crisis and excessive debt.
Lori Clark, senior vice president of operations, has been appointed acting president and CEO.
“As we look to the future, we are facing unprecedented challenges with a global energy crisis that is adding more cost pressure and exacerbating already excessive debt levels; pressing federal regulations for the phasing out of fossil fuels, and a need to support New Brunswickers with the rapid adoption of greener energy solutions,” said board chair Charles V. Firlotte, in a release.
“As such, the Board has concluded we must embark on a significant transformation of the organization.”
Cronkhite was appointed as president and CEO in April 2020.
NB Power says Price Waterhouse Canada, a professional services firm, will lead a review which will find ways to optimize the organization’s cost structure and meet debt obligations, as well as identify alternative solutions to meet New Brunswickers’ power needs in a “cost-competitive, reliable and environmentally sustainable way.”
The board says it is starting to look for Cronkhite’s replacement, which is expected to take several months.
Clark has worked in many capacities within NB Power, including controller and vice president of regulatory affairs and strategic initiatives.
“We are in good hands as we embark on this change, and I am confident Keith and Lori will ensure a seamless transition for our customers, employees and partners,” said Firlotte.
EUB punts rate hearing as NB Power studies $122M smart meter plan
EUB agrees to suspend hearing so it can deal first with NB Power's proposed $122M purchase of smart meters
An effort to redesign the way NB Power charges customers for electricity — generally viewed as bad news for those who heat with electricity — has been suspended by the New Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board for one year.
The EUB has agreed to consider an upcoming NB Power application to spend $122 million on new "smart meters" for homes and businesses first.
Energy and Utilities Board chair Raymond Gorman says the board has
delayed the rate design hearing for one year. (Pat Richard/CBC)NB Power has been under pressure from the EUB to better match prices it charges for electricity to the cost of producing and distributing power. That could see consumers paying substantially different prices for power between summer and winter — even between day and night.
But the utility has argued there is little room to make substantial changes like that until its entire inventory of power meters is upgraded.
"It is NB Power's submission that the rate design proceeding is … premature because it does contemplate discussion of rate design options that might not be available depending on … (smart meter) deployment," NB Power's senior legal counsel John Furey said during arguments for the suspension.
Tracking more frequent
Unlike current units that have to be physically visited to be read, smart meters will connect directly to NB Power computers, allowing individual customers to have electricity consumption tracked several times an hour instead of once a month.
The utility says this will allow it to charge a variety of rates for electricity — more when consumption is higher, such as in the mornings, on weekends and during winter — and less when consumption is lower.
"We are going from reading a customer's meter once a month, so 12 times a year, up to 12 times an hour," former NB Power executive Neil Larlee said during testimony in front of the EUB last February.
Smart meters for $122M
But the new meters are expensive, an estimated $92 million to acquire one for each customer and another $30 million to have them installed and made operational.
It's an expense that largely requires EUB approval, something the regulator is expected to hear evidence on this winter and rule on by next spring. NB Power said without that decision being made first, redesigning rates made little sense.

Because those who heat with electricity consume large amounts of power during high-demand cold snaps, the rate design process is generally expected to result in higher costs for that group.
However, NB Power has argued smart meters will allow for enough discount periods that electric heat customers who move activities such as laundry, dishwashing and showers into the evening will be able to offset some or all of the increases they experience.
NB Power is expected to formally apply to buy and install smart meters provincewide within the next two weeks as part of its next general rate increase application.
The rate design hearing will resume next fall.
NB Power's smart meters plan not so smart, 2 expert reviews find
$122M-plan is poorly thought out, should be rejected by EUB, separately commissioned reports conclude
NB Power's plan to spend $122.7 million over three years to deploy smart meters for all its residential and commercial customers is poorly thought out and should be rejected by the Energy and Utilities Board at hearings next month, according to separate experts hired to review the strategy.
"As currently proposed, the AMI [advanced metering infrastructure] project could commit NB Power and its customers to a heavy cost burden without fully defining and quantifying the future benefits to be gained," wrote Edmund Finamore, a smart meter consultant from Pennsylvania commissioned by public intervener Heather Black to scrutinize the plan.
"It is not clear that NB Power has implemented sufficient project management controls methods to execute a firm plan, achieve firm project milestones and control project costs."
- EUB punts rate hearing as NB Power studies $122M smart meter plan
- Seasonal power rates could cause consumer backlash, says consultant
A second review of the proposal by a Boston-area energy consultant hired separately by the Energy and Utilities Board also found significant flaws.
"NB Power has significantly understated the costs and overstated the benefits of its AMI proposal," says the analysis by a group of five authors working for Synapse Energy Economics out of Cambridge, Mass.
"We recommend that the board reject the company's AMI proposal."
'Essential' to cleaner, more reliable grid
NB Power has been working toward upgrading its distribution system to a "smart grid" over the past six years and the wholesale installation of smart meters and other AMI to serve every customer has long been a centrepiece of the utility's plan.
Unlike current units that have to be physically visited to be read, smart meters will connect directly to NB Power computers, allowing individual customers to have electricity consumption tracked several times an hour instead of once a month.
The utility says this will allow it to charge a variety of rates for electricity — more when consumption is higher, such as in the mornings, on weekends and during winter — and less when consumption is lower.
That in turn will encourage consumers to shift demand to underutilized parts of the day, it says.
"We are going from reading a customer's meter once a month, so 12 times a year, up to 12 times an hour," former NB Power executive Neil Larlee said during testimony in front of the EUB last February.
The meters will also allow customers to sell electricity back to NB Power if they install solar or other power generating capability on their property and will give the utility instant information on outages, including the individual homes affected.
"This communication network along with the AMI meters is essential to a building smarter, cleaner, more reliable and efficient power grid and will lay the foundation for many of the long-term customer benefits that NB Power will deliver through its Energy Smart NB plan," said the utility in its application to the EUB to acquire the units.
Cost outweighs savings
But even NB Power acknowledges the cost of buying, installing and operating 355,000 new smart meters to blanket the province in a three-year rollout is high without enough savings to completely pay for it.
The utility has detailed 15 ways the new meters will cut expenses but the combined benefits total just $121.4 million That's $1.3 million less than the program is budgeted to cost.
Spending so much money on an initiative that is not essential and not cost effective is unwise.
- Synapse report
Both Finnamore and Synapse Energy disputed the value of several of the claimed savings as inflated and Synapse further argued since NB Power's own numbers show the investment in smart meters will cost money in the long run the case is too weak to proceed.
"The company's own analysis suggests that the proposal is not cost effective and that analysis suffers from some fundamental flaws," concluded the Synapse report.
"Spending so much money on an initiative that is not essential and not cost effective is unwise."
Proposal needs refining
Both consultants suggested if properly handled, the introduction of smart meters could benefit both NB Power and its customers, but each separately concluded the utility's plan lacks detail and a convincing rationale.
Both called for the application to be denied so the utility can offer a more refined proposal.
NB Power is facing a 12-day hearing in front of the Energy and Utilities Board beginning Feb. 8.
In addition to seeking permission to invest in smart meters, it is also attempting to win approval for an average two per cent rate increase it has proposed for April 1 and is asking for the flexibility to employ special rate increases when large unexpected weather or market events cause its costs to jump unexpectedly.
NB Power's smart meter program among plans under microscope at EUB hearing
A proposal to enact new surcharges to help pay for unexpected events will also be scrutinized
NB Power makes its annual appearance in front of the Energy and Utilities Board on Wednesday morning to seek permission to raise electricity rates in April, but other large issues promise to dominate what is expected to be an extended 12-day hearing.
A pricey plan to install smart meters provincewide and a proposal to enact new surcharges to help NB Power pay for unexpected events, like storm damage, are likely to be more contentious and time consuming than the utility's request for an average two per cent increase in rates.
"This hearing has resulted in one of the largest volumes of evidence filed before this Board on an NB Power matter," NB Power notes in an opening statement it pre-filed with the utilities board.
"Evidence has moved well beyond the merits of (our) revenue requirement."

Thousands of pages of evidence have been filed on issues connected to the hearing since October and some of that has come from experts pushing back against NB Power's various plans.
Smart meters
More than the rate increase, NB Power`s top priority has become winning approval for a $122.7-million plan to deploy Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI), including smart meters, around New Brunswick over the next three years.
The meters, one for each of NB Power`s 350,000 customers, are designed to connect directly to the utility`s computers and will open up opportunities to establish high and low rates during the day to try and steer electricity consumption away from peak hours.
The meters also allow for homeowners to install their own generation, like solar panels, or invest in large battery storage units to load up on low-cost nighttime power and sell what they don't need back to the utility.
NB Power plans to spend $122.7 million to deploy Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI). (Ryan Pilon/CBC) NB Power said the meters, and an aggressive new package of consumer energy conservation initiatives, will help flatten out expensive wintertime consumption peaks on its system and is the key to lowering costs and avoiding the construction of new power plants.
"NB Power believes AMI and energy smart investments are essential for its customers and should be approved by the board," it said in its opening statement.
"Delay in making these investments, particularly in AMI delays progress in reaching all of the targets for reduction of energy and peak demand."
'It will be fully debated'
But at least two outside experts hired to evaluate NB Power's smart meter plan — and who will testify during the hearing — question the economics of the proposal.
With increased likelihood that NB Power will be able to recover all costs associated with extraordinary events, there is less pressure on the Company to control those costs.
- US energy consultant Synapse Energy
That means there will be an intense examination of the smart meter issue in front of the board, according to Public Intervener Heather Black.
"It will be fully debated," said Black. "When there's such a big project at hand, questions come up. Has it been properly planned for are the costs and benefits properly and accurately estimated?"
Also drawing criticism is a proposal to allow NB Power to levy special surcharges when it is hit with unexpected expenses like storm damage — a so-called rate adjustment mechanism.
NB Power has missed profit targets by wide margins in five of the last six years in part because of an unprecedented series of weather events.
The utility estimates it paid $63.8 million to restore power and clean up after ice storms in December 2013, post-tropical storm Arthur in July 2014 and more ice storms in January 2017.
NB Power worker picturing cleaning up after post-tropical storm Arthur. (CBC) It is seeking approval for a mechanism to isolate and charge customers extra for costs caused by "an extraordinary event or circumstance beyond the control of the company". But opposing experts who worry that could develop into a blank cheque for the utility are lined up against that idea as well.
"With increased likelihood that NB Power will be able to recover all costs associated with extraordinary events, there is less pressure on the Company to control those costs," wrote US energy consultant Synapse Energy who was hired by the utilities board to evaluate NB Power's application.
"It will be a focus of the hearing certainly," Black said of the rate adjustment mechanism idea. "I think we'll have a healthy discussion about that."
The hearing begins Wednesday morning in Saint John.
NB Power's smart meter plan labelled a 'money loser' during EUB grilling
The utility estimated the total savings would fall short of the $122.7M price tag
A trio of NB Power executives were under pressure Wednesday to justify why the utility wants to invest more than $100 million to install smart meters with customers when its own accounting shows savings from the change will be less than the cost to implement it.
"Those projected costs are $122.7 million and the projected benefits are $121.4 million. Is that correct?" asked Christopher Stewart, a lawyer for J.D. Irving Ltd. during the opening day of NB Power's annual rate hearing.
"Yes. That's the life cycle costs of the project and the life cycle benefits of the project," responded NB Power senior vice president of operations Lori Clark.
"That's negative $1.3 million," observed Stewart. "It's a money loser."
Clark, along with two other NB Power senior vice presidents, Keith Cronkhite and Darren Murphy, fielded initial questions about the utility's smart meter plans in front of the Energy and Utilities Board as part of a 12-day review of a number of issues.
Lori Clark, NB Power's vice president of operations, fielded questions about the cost and benefits of the smart meters plan. (Robert Jones/CBC NEWS)The board has the power to approve or reject NB Power projects that cost more than $50 million, including the smart meter project.
Greater benefits expected
The three vice presidents argued that smart meters are needed as a foundation for NB Power to implement a number of other modernization plans and suggested total financial benefits will likely be greater than the analysis it prepared for the hearing seemed to show.
The meters will connect directly to the utility's computers and track consumption in real time. That will open up opportunities to establish high and low rates during the day to try and steer electricity consumption to off-peak hours.
The meters also allow for homeowners to install their own generation, like solar panels, or invest in large battery storage units to load up on low-cost nighttime power and sell what they don't need back to the utility.
Smart meters became the focus on the first day of the annual rate hearing. (Ryan Pilon/CBC)NB Power said the meters, and an aggressive new package of consumer energy conservation initiatives, will help it soften expensive wintertime consumption peaks on its system and is the key to lowering costs and avoiding the construction of new power plants — advantages it did not fully detail in its proposal.
"We did not take into account all of the potential upside benefits. We were very conservative in the calculation of our benefits," said Clark. "There are a number of projects that are enabled by our Advanced Metering Infrastructure that haven't been identified in the business case."
Stewart responded: "You say you've taken a conservative approach but its the approach you've chosen to bring forward."
Christopher Stewart, a lawyer for J.D. Irving Ltd., described the smart meter plan as a "money loser." (Robert Jones/CBC NEWS)Recent complaints
Clark said the multiple recent complaints the utility has received from people surprised by the size of their January power bills show the value of smart meter.
But she assured Gerald Bourque, leader of New Brunswick's fledgling KISS N.B. Political Party and a hearing participant, that no one who objects to the device will be made to take one.
"When we are dealing with high bill complaints like we have been this last month, customers would actually be able to see their usage throughout the month and not be subject to receiving a final bill at the end of the month and being surprised by their consumption," she said.
"We will have an opt out policy."
Whether the meters pay for themselves or not, it is important the board not judge the proposal to buy them on that issue alone, Murphy said.
"It's more than just economics," he said. "It's about preparing for that future and modernizing the infrastructure."
NB Power lacks 'coherent strategy' for energy efficiency: consultant
The utility is seeking permission to spend $23.2 million to reduce electricity demand
NB Power's cancellation of a popular and effective heat pump rebate program in 2016 in favour of funding an unpopular and ineffective home retrofit program instead is part of an incoherent approach to energy reduction initiatives at the utility, the Energy and Utilities Board was told on Thursday.
"There's not a particularly coherent strategy for the residential programs," said Angela Vitulli, a Boston area energy consultant participating for the annual rate hearings in Saint John.
Vitulli was hired by public intervener Heather Black to evaluate the "cost effectiveness and reasonableness" of NB Power's energy efficiency and consumption reduction initiatives, or the so-called "demand side management" (DSM) programs.
Heather
Black, the public intervener, commissioned a study into the cost
effectiveness and reasonableness of NB Power's energy efficiency
programs. (Robert Jones/CBC)The utility is seeking permission to spend $23.2 million beginning in April to reduce electricity demand by customers — especially at winter peak times. NB Power executives have testified that encouraging efficiency is cheaper for it than building new generating plants or buying new supplies of power to cope with rising demand.
But a checkered history of success with previous DSM programs has come under intense scrutiny at its ongoing rate hearing.
Scrapped heat pump program
Vitulli was especially critical of the abrupt ending of a highly popular $500 heat pump rebate program that NB Power launched in September 2015 and cancelled one year later. The utility expected to finance 3,000 units, but consumers used the rebate to buy and install 14,000 instead.
That put the program well over budget and led NB Power to concentrate resources on a second program that was much less popular.
It required homeowners to pay for an energy audit and complete any recommended insulation upgrades before qualifying for a heat pump rebate.
The
hearing is in front of a three-person panel of the Energy and Utilities
Board, including Patrick Ervin, left, vice-chairman Francois Beaulieu,
centre, and Michael Costello. (Robert Jones/CBC NEWS) NB Power subsidized the cost of insulation, but interest among homeowners was low.
In the first two years, 4,000 homes were projected for upgrades, but only 457 owners came forward. For those who did, audits showed the utility spent more than double for every kilowatt hour of electricity reduced than the rebate program achieved.
"Its (the heat pump rebate) numbers were much better than the other (program)," Vitulli said under questioning by J.D. Irving lawyer Christopher Stewart.
"It was a successful program and it seems odd that NB Power chose to discontinue it — their reasoning being it was too successful and it was taking up too much of their budget. NB Power should be directing its DSM resources to programs that are successful and are cost effective and that have demand for them from their customer base."
Ted Leopkey of NB Power defended the switch, claiming the heat pump rebate was so successful it caused a "transformation" in the market and rebates were no longer needed for high efficiency heat pump installations to continue in the province.
The EUB hearing, which began last week, is expected to run until the end of next week. (Robert Jones/CBC NEWS)Vitulli also criticized NB Power's product rebate programs, including a point of sale LED light bulb rebate program financed by NB Power that subsidized the purchase of 432,000 bulbs in 2015 and 2016.
A follow-up study showed "free riders" — people who intended to buy the bulbs without a rebate — made up 40 per cent of the purchases pushing the cost of the program far beyond its benefit.
"I take it you are suggesting a failure or inconsistency (by NB Power) to choose these programs based on cost effectiveness or feasibility," asked Stewart.
"Yes," replied Vitulli, who was forced to call into the hearing from the United States because of scheduling problems.
EUB lawyer Ellen Desmond also questioned NB Power's track record of executing its plans, noting it had asked for more money than it spent on DSM programs at two rate hearings in a row — $6.9 million too much in total.
"There are dollars being left not developing the program," said Desmond.
"Isn't it an alternative that perhaps you budget a little more conservatively, and if you are successful, well then go forward and develop the program in the future? But the result would be to keep rates a little bit lower?"
Leopky said the utility has programs better organized this year and the requested budget is reasonable.
"I am not sure it's appropriate to use the past performance of the 15-16 and 16-17 years, which were ramp-up periods, to forecast future targets," he said.



N.B. Power exec says rate increase needed for Point Lepreau upgrades

Rate hearing shows utility having bad year financially, environmentally

Energy and Utilities Board hearings offer unique forum for public accountability







No comments:
Post a Comment