Many folks know that I saved this CBC BULLSHIT a while back. Just updated it today tis all.
N'esy Pas Prime Minister Trudeau "The Younger" ????
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ralph-goodale-national-security-public-1.3753329
https://www.scribd.com/document/323461215/CBC-Shows-Its-Nasty-Arse-EH-Rotten-Ralphy-Goodale
Liberals identify 10 key national security
issues for public consultations
Review deals with problems Liberals have identified with Anti-terror Act
By Catharine Tunney, CBC News
Posted: Sep 08, 2016 3:34 PM ET
Last Updated: Sep 08, 2016 4:09 PM ET
Goodale outlines plan for security consultations
1:52
The Liberal government is asking the public to weigh in online on what it sees as 10 key national security topics, ranging from threat reduction to terrorist financing, as it moves toward amending the Anti-terrorism Act.
- New bill would allow border guards to collect biographic data on those leaving Canada
- Liberals propose oversight committee with 'extraordinary access' to scrutinize national security
- Canada to increase anti-terror efforts with new office to curb radicalization
"I think Canadians welcome actually being engaged."
The Liberals' discussion paper outlines the government's main issues and asks the public specific questions on each topic.
The subjects are:
- Accountability.
- Prevention.
- Threat reduction.
- Domestic national security information sharing.
- Passenger protect program.
- Criminal Code terrorism measures.
- Terrorist entity listing procedures.
- Terrorist financing.
- Investigative capabilities in a digital world.
- Intelligence and evidence.
Goodale's department said it's also open to general feedback and people can email in with other topics of concern.
Despite much protest, controversial
anti-terror Bill C-51 is now law, after being granted royal assent in
2015. (Jonathan Hayward/Canadian Press)
Canadians have from Sept. 8 until Dec. 1 to weigh in online.
Goodale said that because the consultation is online "it's a low-cost endeavour."
Security balanced with rights and freedoms
During the 2015 election campaign, the Liberals promised to repeal what they called the "problematic elements" of Bill C-51, brought in under the previous Conservative government. The Liberals, then with third-party status, did vote to support the controversial anti-terrorism legislation, arguing they could change it if they took power.Bill C-51, now known as the Anti-terrorism Act, allows Canada's intelligence agencies to share Canadians' personal information more widely with meaningful parliamentary oversight. Authorities can detain someone for up to seven days if it's believed a terrorist event may occur.
In his mandate letter, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau tasked Goodale to introduce new legislation that balances security with Canadians' rights and freedoms.
Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale says the
government wants to hear from Canadians about changes that need to be
made to the Anti-terrorism Act. (Chris Wattie/Reuters)
- That all Canadian Security Intelligence Service warrants would respect the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
- Ensure that Canadians are not limited from lawful protests and advocacy.
- Sharpen the definition of terms like "terrorist propaganda."
- Require the Communications Security Establishment to obtain a warrant to engage in the surveillance of Canadians.
- Require a statutory review of the full Anti-Terrorism Act after three years.
More legislation coming
The Liberals have checked off some of the promises that had been on that to-do list.After ISIS sympathizer Aaron Driver was killed by police last month in Strathroy, Ont., Goodale said the government is in the final stages of hiring a senior adviser who will spearhead an anti-terror program to counter radicalization, with a new national office opening sometime in the fall.
Following news that a six-year-old boy had been flagged on Canada's no-fly list, the Liberals announced they've created an office to assist passengers mistakenly barred from flights.
And earlier this summer the minister helped announce new legislation to create a joint oversight committee with robust powers to scrutinize national security matters.
The nine-member committee would consist of seven MPs and two senators who would have the clearance required to explore "any and every dimension of national security that they want to look at," Goodale said at the time.
Micheal Vonn, policy director for the B.C. Civil Liberties Association, praised the consultations.
"Right now, we don't even have a way to meaningfully assess the efficacy and legality of Canada's national security activities. We need serious evidence-based reform, not legislative tweaking," he said in a release.
To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.
By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.
354 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
This some of the top string that CBC Deleted
Benny Binion
I would trust Daffy Duck with national security before this government.
5 hours ago 75 Likes 48 Dislikes
Show 39 older replies
C Martyn Tyntof
@Byron Whitford Nothing to do with the actual victims. Harper should
have stayed with his people, his party. In Canada the PM is one person
among equals, representing the people. The international press heard
about his cowardice:
“Prime Minister Stephen Harper hid in a cupboard in parliament for
about 15 minutes during Wednesday's attack as MPs sharpened flagpoles
to use as spears against the gunman.”
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-
http://www.theguardian.com/
There was no security with Harper in the caucus room - he would not
allow it - so he had complete freedom of choice for his actions.
Harper chose to go and hide in the closet. He went alone. He told no
one - the members of his caucus did not know where he was and they
testified to that effect. Harper apologised to them the following day
for what he did.
"Prime Minister Stephen Harper told his hushed caucus Wednesday
morning he felt remorse for surreptitiously ducking into a closet
during last week's assault on Parliament Hill”
http://www.cbc.ca/news/
1 hour ago 5 Likes 5 Dislikes
David Raymond Amos
Content disabled.
@Benny Binion I agree but I am a fan of Goofy. At least he made honest
mistakes FYI the Liebranos failed to protect me in 2003. They are
arguing me about that fact in Federal Court right now file #
T-1557-15. My question is will CBC block this comment too?
1 hour ago 0 Likes 0 Dislikes
John Dirlik
@Philippe Dugas
"Your apologist comments..."
Yes, I always use "depraved" and "animal" as terms of endearment.
You should hear what I use for those I dislike.
1 hour ago 3 Likes 4 Dislikes
This some of the top string that now exists
James Lawrence
And here I thought the list might look more like:
1. Threat of elbowing in legislature
2. Proliferation of selfie sticks
3. Shirtless incidents on rise
4. Growing references to PM as small tuberous vegetable
5. Lack of staff support for wife of PM
6. Fear of funding deficiency for future Liberal retreats
7. Stocking of food banks for Syrian refugees
8. Maintaining list of bi-weekly vacation spots for PM
9. Logistics for supporting PM's wife on multiple wardrobe donations
10. Complete and utter lack of deficit management and economic stimulus
16 days ago 109 Likes 48 Dislikes
1. Threat of elbowing in legislature
2. Proliferation of selfie sticks
3. Shirtless incidents on rise
4. Growing references to PM as small tuberous vegetable
5. Lack of staff support for wife of PM
6. Fear of funding deficiency for future Liberal retreats
7. Stocking of food banks for Syrian refugees
8. Maintaining list of bi-weekly vacation spots for PM
9. Logistics for supporting PM's wife on multiple wardrobe donations
10. Complete and utter lack of deficit management and economic stimulus
16 days ago 109 Likes 48 Dislikes
David Raymond Amos
@James Lawrence Methinks that
the CBC should have read my email to their bosses before they blocked
my comment AGAIN Look out fro ROUND TWO
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2016/09/methinks-mindless-librano-lawyer-rotten.html
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2016/09/methinks-mindless-librano-lawyer-rotten.html
15 days ago 5 Likes 4 Dislikes
@Richard Sharp FYI all the political parties smeared me for years while CBC blocked my comments
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2016/06/attn-alex-johnston-i-reregistered-with.htmlI
CBC even ignored their non partisan mandate and denied that I was running for public office FIVE times even while I was suing the CROWN during the last election Go Figure
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276
Should I send the lawyers Hubby Lacriox and Melanie Joly another email in order to see this comment posted within a website owned by my fellow taxpayers?
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2016/06/attn-alex-johnston-i-reregistered-with.htmlI
CBC even ignored their non partisan mandate and denied that I was running for public office FIVE times even while I was suing the CROWN during the last election Go Figure
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276
Should I send the lawyers Hubby Lacriox and Melanie Joly another email in order to see this comment posted within a website owned by my fellow taxpayers?
15 days ago 4 Likes 1 Dislike
---------- Original message ----------
From: Póstur FOR
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 02:07:14 +0000
Subject: Re: ROUND TWO Methinks that the CBC should have read my email to their bosses before they blocked my comment AGAIN N'esy Pas Mr Mulcair?
To: David Amos
Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received
Kveðja / Best regards
Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)"
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 02:03:02 +0000
Subject: RE: ROUND TWO Methinks that the CBC should have read my email to their bosses before they blocked my comment AGAIN N'esy Pas Mr Mulcair?
To: David Amos
Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick.
Please be assured that your email has been received, will be reviewed, and a response will be forthcoming.
Once again, thank you for taking the time to write.
Merci d'avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du Nouveau-Brunswick.
Soyez assuré que votre courriel a bien été reçu, qu'il sera examiné et qu'une réponse vous sera acheminée.
Merci encore d'avoir pris de temps de nous écrire.
Sincerely, / Sincèrement,
Mallory Fowler
Correspondence Manager / Gestionnaire de la correspondance
Office of the Premier / Cabinet du premier ministre
---------- Original message ----------
From: Info
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 02:02:45 +0000
Subject: Auto Response / Réponse automatique
To: David Amos
Thank you for writing to the Office of the Secretary to the Governor General. We appreciate hearing your views and suggestions. Responses to specific inquiries can be expected within three weeks. Please note that general comments and opinions may not receive a response.
*****
Nous vous remercions d'avoir écrit au Bureau du secrétaire du gouverneur général. Nous apprécions votre point de vue et vos suggestions. Il faut prévoir trois semaines pour une réponse à une demande précise. Veuillez noter qu’il n’y a pas nécessairement de suivi pour les opinions et les commentaires généraux qui sont envoyés.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 22:02:37 -0400
Subject: ROUND TWO Methinks that the CBC should have read my email to their bosses before they blocked my comment AGAIN N'esy Pas Mr Mulcair?
To: "ht.lacroix"
Cc: David Amos
FYI Obviously I already pasted Minister Joly's response and tweeted it
as well. Watch ho fast i post thsi email
https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/status/774045513788198912
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
@edmontonpolice @JustinTrudeau @RCMPAlberta @doniveson @RachelNotley
@thelipscombe I dont care what @JohnnyALBT says
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2016/09/methinks-mindless-librano-lawyer-rotten.html
9:43 PM - 8 Sep 2016
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ralph-goodale-national-security-public-1.3753329
292 Comments
Benny Binion
I would trust Daffy Duck with national security before this government.
5 hours ago 75 Likes 48 Dislikes
Show 39 older replies
C Martyn Tyntof
@Byron Whitford Nothing to do with the actual victims. Harper should
have stayed with his people, his party. In Canada the PM is one person
among equals, representing the people. The international press heard
about his cowardice:
“Prime Minister Stephen Harper hid in a cupboard in parliament for
about 15 minutes during Wednesday's attack as MPs sharpened flagpoles
to use as spears against the gunman.”
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-29752077
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/24/canadian-pm-stephen-harper-ottawa-shooting
There was no security with Harper in the caucus room - he would not
allow it - so he had complete freedom of choice for his actions.
Harper chose to go and hide in the closet. He went alone. He told no
one - the members of his caucus did not know where he was and they
testified to that effect. Harper apologised to them the following day
for what he did.
"Prime Minister Stephen Harper told his hushed caucus Wednesday
morning he felt remorse for surreptitiously ducking into a closet
during last week's assault on Parliament Hill”
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ottawa-shooting-stephen-harper-tells-mps-he-s-sorry-he-left-during-attack-1.2816912
1 hour ago 5 Likes 5 Dislikes
David Raymond Amos
Content disabled.
@Benny Binion I agree but I am a fan of Goofy. At least he made honest
mistakes FYI the Liebranos failed to protect me in 2003. They are
arguing me about that fact in Federal Court right now file #
T-1557-15. My question is will CBC block this comment too?
1 hour ago 0 Likes 0 Dislikes
John Dirlik
@Philippe Dugas
"Your apologist comments..."
Yes, I always use "depraved" and "animal" as terms of endearment.
You should hear what I use for those I dislike.
1 hour ago 3 Likes 4 Dislikes
James Lawrence
And here I thought the list might look more like:
1. Threat of elbowing in legislature
2. Proliferation of selfie sticks
3. Shirtless incidents on rise
4. Growing references to PM as small tuberous vegetable
5. Lack of staff support for wife of PM
6. Fear of funding deficiency for future Liberal retreats
7. Stocking of food banks for Syrian refugees
8. Maintaining list of bi-weekly vacation spots for PM
9. Logistics for supporting PM's wife on multiple wardrobe donations
10. Complete and utter lack of deficit management and economic stimulus
5 hours ago 61 Likes 34 Dislikes
Show 10 older replies
Dwight Williams
@Paul Douglas
I've got bad news for you Paul.
A lot of people don't think the list is meant as a joke, and I'm not
sure that James did when he wrote it.
And that's not good for anybody.
1 hour ago 2 Likes 4 Dislikes
john.mctaggart
@Nicole Ford
Nah!
1 hour ago 0 Likes 1 Dilike
David Raymond Amos
This comment is awaiting moderation by the site administrators.
@James Lawrence Methinks that the CBC should have read my email to
their bosses before they blocked my comment AGAIN Look out fro ROUND
TWO
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2016/09/methinks-mindless-librano-lawyer-rotten.html
11 minutes ago 0 Likes 0 Dilikes
On 9/8/16, David Amos
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Joly, Mélanie (PCH)"
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 00:19:17 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the mindless Librano lawyer Rotten Ralphy Goodale just kicked over a beehive N'esy Pas Hubby Baby Lacroix and Ezzy Levant?
To: David Amos
Merci d’avoir écrit à l’honorable Mélanie Joly, ministre du Patrimoine canadien.
En raison d’une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance adressée à la ministre, veuillez prendre note qu’il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu avec soin.
*********
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Mélanie Joly, Minister of Canadian Heritage.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be carefully reviewed.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 20:19:13 -0400
Subject: Methinks the mindless Librano lawyer Rotten Ralphy Goodale just kicked over a beehive N'esy Pas Hubby Baby Lacroix and Ezzy Levant?
To: "ht.lacroix"
Cc: David Amos
My question is will the Governor General's daughter finally do her job
and quit blocking my ligit comments?
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ralph-goodale-national-security-public-1.3753329
Liberals identify 10 key national security issues for public consultations
Review deals with problems Liberals have identified with Anti-terror Act
By Catharine Tunney, CBC News Posted: Sep 08, 2016 3:34 PM ET
Goodale outlines plan for security consultations 1:52
Related Stories
National security review to kick off with release of discussion paper
Border phone search raises charter issues, lawyers say
Justin Trudeau must measure words in response to acts of terror
Liberals must change Canadian anti-terror law, rights advocate says
Report often and openly: Goodale's instructions for new spy watchdog
MPs, senators to oversee security, intelligence agencies under new
Liberal bill
Mom of boy on no-fly list 'really looking forward' to travelling
after feds announce plan to end mix-ups
External Links
Consultation on national security
(Note: CBC does not endorse and is not responsible for the content of
external links.)
The Liberal government is asking the public to weigh in online on what
it sees as 10 key national security topics, ranging from threat
reduction to terrorist financing, as it moves toward amending the
Anti-terrorism Act.
New bill would allow border guards to collect biographic data on
those leaving Canada
Liberals propose oversight committee with 'extraordinary access'
to scrutinize national security
Canada to increase anti-terror efforts with new office to curb
radicalization
"We want to hear from Canadians about what needs to be fixed about the
previous government's Bill C-51," announced Ralph Goodale, minister of
public safety and emergency preparedness at a news conference in
Edmonton on Thursday.
"I think Canadians welcome actually being engaged."
The Liberals' discussion paper outlines the government's main issues
and asks the public specific questions on each topic.
The subjects are:
Accountability.
Prevention.
Threat reduction.
Domestic national security information sharing.
Passenger protect program.
Criminal Code terrorism measures.
Terrorist entity listing procedures.
Terrorist financing.
Investigative capabilities in a digital world.
Intelligence and evidence.
The consultation form includes questions such as, "What should the
role of the government be in efforts to counter radicalization to
violence?" and "In what circumstances, if any, should investigators
have the ability to compel individuals or companies to assist with
decryption?"
Goodale's department said it's also open to general feedback and
people can email in with other topics of concern.
Bill C51 Protest 20150314
Despite much protest, controversial anti-terror Bill C-51 is now law,
after being granted royal assent in 2015. (Jonathan Hayward/Canadian
Press)
The public safety minister, flanked by Justice Minister Jody
Wilson-Raybould, stressed that the government's policy has not been
set and the consultations were meant as a conversation starter.
Canadians have from Sept. 8 until Dec. 1 to weigh in online.
Goodale said that because the consultation is online "it's a low-cost
endeavour."
Security balanced with rights and freedoms
During the 2015 election campaign, the Liberals promised to repeal
what they called the "problematic elements" of Bill C-51, brought in
under the previous Conservative government. The Liberals, then with
third-party status, did vote to support the controversial
anti-terrorism legislation, arguing they could change it if they took
power.
Bill C-51, now known as the Anti-terrorism Act, allows Canada's
intelligence agencies to share Canadians' personal information more
widely with meaningful parliamentary oversight. Authorities can detain
someone for up to seven days if it's believed a terrorist event may
occur.
In his mandate letter, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau tasked Goodale to
introduce new legislation that balances security with Canadians'
rights and freedoms.
CANADA-POLITICS/
Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale says the government wants to hear
from Canadians about changes that need to be made to the
Anti-terrorism Act. (Chris Wattie/Reuters)
The Liberal campaign platform also promised to guarantee:
That all Canadian Security Intelligence Service warrants would
respect the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Ensure that Canadians are not limited from lawful protests and advocacy.
Sharpen the definition of terms like "terrorist propaganda."
Require the Communications Security Establishment to obtain a
warrant to engage in the surveillance of Canadians.
Require a statutory review of the full Anti-Terrorism Act after three years.
More legislation coming
The Liberals have checked off some of the promises that had been on
that to-do list.
After ISIS sympathizer Aaron Driver was killed by police last month in
Strathroy, Ont., Goodale said the government is in the final stages of
hiring a senior adviser who will spearhead an anti-terror program to
counter radicalization, with a new national office opening sometime in
the fall.
Following news that a six-year-old boy had been flagged on Canada's
no-fly list, the Liberals announced they've created an office to
assist passengers mistakenly barred from flights.
And earlier this summer the minister helped announce new legislation
to create a joint oversight committee with robust powers to scrutinize
national security matters.
The nine-member committee would consist of seven MPs and two senators
who would have the clearance required to explore "any and every
dimension of national security that they want to look at," Goodale
said at the time.
Micheal Vonn, policy director for the B.C. Civil Liberties
Association, praised the consultations.
"Right now, we don't even have a way to meaningfully assess the
efficacy and legality of Canada's national security activities. We
need serious evidence-based reform, not legislative tweaking," he said
in a release.
Document
Zoom
«
Page 1 of 23
»
Mobile users: View the document
(PDF KB)
(Text KB)
CBC is not responsible for 3rd party content
Report Typo or Error Send Feedback
To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last
names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online
communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities).
Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.
By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to
reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner
CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions
expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according
to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We
reserve the right to close comments at any time.
David Raymond Amos No translation found. | Logout
233 Comments
Benny Binion
I would trust Daffy Duck with national security before this government.
4 hours ago 55 Likes 43 Dislikes
Show 33 older replies
C Martyn Tyntof
@Byron Whitford Nothing to do with the actual victims. Harper should
have stayed with his people, his party. In Canada the PM is one person
among equals, representing the people. The international press heard
about his cowardice:
“Prime Minister Stephen Harper hid in a cupboard in parliament for
about 15 minutes during Wednesday's attack as MPs sharpened flagpoles
to use as spears against the gunman.”
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-29752077
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/24/canadian-pm-stephen-harper-ottawa-shooting
There was no security with Harper in the caucus room - he would not
allow it - so he had complete freedom of choice for his actions.
Harper chose to go and hide in the closet. He went alone. He told no
one - the members of his caucus did not know where he was and they
testified to that effect. Harper apologised to them the following day
for what he did.
"Prime Minister Stephen Harper told his hushed caucus Wednesday
morning he felt remorse for surreptitiously ducking into a closet
during last week's assault on Parliament Hill”
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ottawa-shooting-stephen-harper-tells-mps-he-s-sorry-he-left-during-attack-1.2816912
12 minutes ago 1 Like 2 Dislikes
David Raymond Amos
This comment is awaiting moderation by the site administrators.
@Benny Binion I agree but I am a fan of Goofy. At least he made honest
mistakes FYI the Liebranos failed to protect me in 2003. They are
arguing me about that fact in Federal Court right now file #
T-1557-15. My question is will CBC block this comment too?
7 minutes ago 0 Likes 0 Dislikes
James Lawrence
And here I thought the list might look more like:
1. Threat of elbowing in legislature
2. Proliferation of selfie sticks
3. Shirtless incidents on rise
4. Growing references to PM as small tuberous vegetable
5. Lack of staff support for wife of PM
6. Fear of funding deficiency for future Liberal retreats
7. Stocking of food banks for Syrian refugees
8. Maintaining list of bi-weekly vacation spots for PM
9. Logistics for supporting PM's wife on multiple wardrobe donations
10. Complete and utter lack of deficit management and economic stimulus
3 hours ago 46 Likes 30 Dislikes
Show 5 older replies
Nicole Ford
@James Lawrence
Accurate!
1 hour ago 4 Likes 2Dislikes
Dwight Williams
@Paul Douglas
Some of us actually prefer posts that have something to do with the
topic. It's one of the burdens of being a grown-up.
1 hour ago 5 Likes 4 Dislikes
Note: The CBC does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By
submitting your comments, you acknowledge that CBC has the right to
reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof
in any manner whatsoever. Please note that comments are moderated and
published according to our submission guidelines.
