Friday, 2 June 2017

Methinks The CBC and The Not So Honourable Diane Lebouthillier Minister of National Revenue picked the wrong day to show me their nasty arses N'esy Pas?

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/revenue-tax-gap-percy-downe-finance-canada-budget-officer-liberals-election-1.4142026


 574 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.


David Raymond Amos 
Content disabled.
David Raymond Amos
Hmmm Perhaps P.E.I. Senator Percy Downe should have read all the emails that I sent him over the years? Bet yet perhaps he should read the one I got from Minister Diane Lebouthillier just before I appeared before a panel of Judges in the Federal Court of Appeal in Fredericton NB and read them the Riot Act. Trust that I will post it within a blog I am about to make about this article i particular.

Need I say that a proud whistle-blower (namely me) against Bank Fraud, Tax Fraud, Securities Fraud and Murder has had enough of arguing mindless minions working for the Crown? The Crown does not even wish to argue why I have been barred from parliamentary properties while running for public office 5 times. Go Figure why CBC reports often about Chucky Leblanc and his barring and recent antics.

"Fredericton police arrest well-known N.B. blogger on legislature grounds"

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fredericton-police-arrest-well-known-n-b-blogger-on-legislature-grounds-1.809584

Now that I have filled the dockets of Federal Courts of Canada and the USA with lots of evidence of many crimes and already discussed such things across borders an on the public record. A Proud Whistle-blower such as is well it is High Time to get down to the serious business of embarrassing the Hell out of Theresa May, Donnie Trump and Trudeau "The Younger" in an ethical political fashion and in several courts before Trump and his pals start another War and the Economy collapses. Only this time I will likely send young hungry lawyers to speak on my behalf because I have grown very weary of arguing with monumental liars. May 24th may have been the last time I will ever be seen speaking on the public record.

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

Yo CBC moderator Good Luck with your conscience


David Raymond Amos
David Raymond Amos
@David Raymond Amos Yo Hubby Lacroix and Minister Joly why is that I was not surprised that CBC blocked this comment or why i already blogged and am now about to Tweet about it?

 https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies


  1. Replying to and

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Min.Mail / Courrier.Min (CRA/ARC)" PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 13:10:52 +0000
Subject: Your various correspondence about abusive tax schemes - 2017-02631
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" motomaniac333@gmail.com

Mr. David Raymond Amos
motomaniac333@gmail.com

Dear Mr. Amos:

Thank you for your various correspondence about abusive tax schemes, and for your understanding regarding the delay of this response.

This is an opportunity for me to address your concerns about the way the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) deals with aggressive tax planning, tax avoidance, and tax evasion by targeting individuals and groups that promote schemes intended to avoid payment of tax. It is also an opportunity for me to present the Government of Canada’s main strategies for ensuring fairness for all taxpayers.

The CRA’s mission is to preserve the integrity of Canada’s tax system, and it is taking concrete and effective action to deal with abusive tax schemes. Through federal budget funding in 2016 and 2017, the government has committed close to $1 billion in cracking down on tax evasion and combatting tax avoidance at home and through the use of offshore transactions. This additional funding is expected to generate federal revenues of $2.6 billion over five years for Budget 2016, and $2.5 billion over five years for Budget 2017.

More precisely, the CRA is cracking down on tax cheats by hiring more auditors, maintaining its underground economy specialist teams, increasing coverage of aggressive goods and service tax/harmonized sales tax planning, increasing coverage of multinational corporations and wealthy individuals, and taking targeted actions aimed at promoters of abusive tax schemes.

On the offshore front, the CRA continues to develop tools to improve its focus on high‑risk taxpayers. It is also considering changes to its Voluntary Disclosures Program following the first set of program recommendations received from an independent Offshore Compliance Advisory Committee. In addition, the CRA is leading international projects to address the base erosion and profit shifting initiative of the G20 and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, and is collaborating with treaty partners to address the Panama Papers leaks.

These actions are evidence of the government’s commitment to protecting tax fairness. The CRA has strengthened its intelligence and technical capacities for the early detection of abusive tax arrangements and deterrence of those who participate in them. To ensure compliance, it has increased the number of actions aimed at promoters who use illegal schemes. These measures include increased audits of such promoters, improved information gathering, criminal investigations where warranted, and better communication with taxpayers.

To deter potential taxpayer involvement in these schemes, the CRA is increasing notifications and warnings through its communications products. It also seeks partnerships with tax preparers, accountants, and community groups so that they can become informed observers who can educate their clients.

The CRA will assess penalties against promoters and other representatives who make false statements involving illegal tax schemes. The promotion of tax schemes to defraud the government can lead to criminal investigations, fingerprinting, criminal prosecution, court fines, and jail time.

Between April 1, 2011, and March 31, 2016, the CRA’s criminal investigations resulted in the conviction of 42 Canadian taxpayers for tax evasion with links to money and assets held offshore. In total, the $34 million in evaded taxes resulted in court fines of $12 million and 734 months of jail time.

When deciding to pursue compliance actions through the courts, the CRA consults the Department of Justice Canada to choose an appropriate solution. Complex tax-related litigation is costly and time consuming, and the outcome may be unsuccessful. All options to recover amounts owed are considered.

More specifically, in relation to the KPMG Isle of Man tax avoidance scheme, publicly available court records show that it is through the CRA’s efforts that the scheme was discovered. The CRA identified many of the participants and continues to actively pursue the matter. The CRA has also identified at least 10 additional tax structures on the Isle of Man, and is auditing taxpayers in relation to these structures.

To ensure tax fairness, the CRA commissioned an independent review in March 2016 to determine if it had acted appropriately concerning KPMG and its clients. In her review, Ms. Kimberley Brooks, Associate Professor and former Dean of the Schulich School of Law at Dalhousie University, examined the CRA’s operational processes and decisions in relation to the KPMG offshore tax structure and its efforts to obtain the names of all taxpayers participating in the scheme. Following this review, the report, released on May 5, 2016, concluded that the CRA had acted appropriately in its management of the KPMG Isle of Man file. The report found that the series of compliance measures the CRA took were in accordance with its policies and procedures. It was concluded that the procedural actions taken on the KPMG file were appropriate given the facts of this particular case and were consistent with the treatment of taxpayers in similar situations. The report concluded that actions by CRA employees were in accordance with the CRA’s Code of Integrity and Professional Conduct. There was no evidence of inappropriate interaction between KPMG and the CRA employees involved in the case.

Under the CRA’s Code of Integrity and Professional Conduct, all CRA employees are responsible for real, apparent, or potential conflicts of interests between their current duties and any subsequent employment outside of the CRA or the Public Service of Canada. Consequences and corrective measures play an important role in protecting the CRA’s integrity.

The CRA takes misconduct very seriously. The consequences of misconduct depend on the gravity of the incident and its repercussions on trust both within and outside of the CRA. Misconduct can result in disciplinary measures up to dismissal.

All forms of tax evasion are illegal. The CRA manages the Informant Leads Program, which handles leads received from the public regarding cases of tax evasion across the country. This program, which coordinates all the leads the CRA receives from informants, determines whether there has been any non-compliance with tax law and ensures that the information is examined and conveyed, if applicable, so that compliance measures are taken. This program does not offer any reward for tips received.

The new Offshore Tax Informant Program (OTIP) has also been put in place. The OTIP offers financial compensation to individuals who provide information related to major cases of offshore tax evasion that lead to the collection of tax owing. As of December 31, 2016, the OTIP had received 963 calls and 407 written submissions from possible informants. Over 218 taxpayers are currently under audit based on information the CRA received through the OTIP.

With a focus on the highest-risk sectors nationally and internationally and an increased ability to gather information, the CRA has the means to target taxpayers who try to hide their income. For example, since January 2015, the CRA has been collecting information on all international electronic funds transfers (EFTs) of $10,000 or more ending or originating in Canada. It is also adopting a proactive approach by focusing each year on four jurisdictions that raise suspicion. For the Isle of Man, the CRA audited 3,000 EFTs totalling $860 million over 12 months and involving approximately 800 taxpayers. Based on these audits, the CRA communicated with approximately 350 individuals and 400 corporations and performed 60 audits.

In January 2017, I reaffirmed Canada’s important role as a leader for tax authorities around the world in detecting the structures used for aggressive tax planning and tax evasion. This is why Canada works daily with the Joint International Tax Shelter Information Centre (JITSIC), a network of tax administrations in over 35 countries. The CRA participates in two expert groups within the JITSIC and leads the working group on intermediaries and proponents. This ongoing collaboration is a key component of the CRA’s work to develop strong relationships with the international community, which will help it refine the world-class tax system that benefits all Canadians.

The CRA is increasing its efforts and is seeing early signs of success. Last year, the CRA recovered just under $13 billion as a result of its audit activities on the domestic and offshore fronts. Two-thirds of these recoveries are the result of its audit efforts relating to large businesses and multinational companies.

But there is still much to do, and additional improvements and investments are underway.

Tax cheats are having a harder and harder time hiding. Taxpayers who choose to promote or participate in malicious and illegal tax strategies must face the consequences of their actions. Canadians expect nothing less. I invite you to read my most recent statement on this matter at canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/news/2017/03/
statement_from_thehonourabledianelebouthillierministerofnational.

Thank you for taking the time to write. I hope the information I have provided is helpful.

Sincerely,

The Honourable Diane Lebouthillier
Minister of National Revenue



Ottawa forfeited $8.7B in uncollected tax in 2014, says report

CRA 'tax gap' report cautions that much of the billions owed might never be collectable

By Dean Beeby, CBC News Posted: Jun 02, 2017 5:00 AM ET

 
Diane Lebouthillier, minister of national revenue, has released a new report on the 'tax gap,' part of a commitment in the 2015 Liberal election platform. The gap measures what taxes are owed compared with taxes actually paid.
Diane Lebouthillier, minister of national revenue, has released a new report on the 'tax gap,' part of a commitment in the 2015 Liberal election platform. The gap measures what taxes are owed compared with taxes actually paid. (Sean Kilpatrick/Canadian Press)

Canada's personal income "tax gap" — taxes due but not collected — hit about $8.7 billion for 2014, says a ground-breaking Canada Revenue Agency report.

The analysis, which the Liberals promised in the 2015 election campaign, includes estimates of tax revenue lost because of unreported income in the domestic underground economy, as well as tax formally assessed against taxpayers who did not pay up for some reason.

The report follows a parallel analysis released June 30 last year by Finance Canada that estimated there was another $4.9 billion in GST/HST that was due in 2014 but not collected, bringing the total "tax gap" so far to about $13.6 billion.

Both analyses were for the domestic economy only, and did not attempt the tricky calculation of tax revenue lost because of offshore tax schemes — a hot-button issue that will get its own CRA report next year.


The latest report, released Friday, is riddled with caveats that warn of incomplete or even non-existent data, and of difficult assumptions. It also cautions that much of the taxes owed might never be collected because of factors such as the bankruptcy of a taxpayer.

Likely an underestimate


Despite those warnings, the 56-page document says the $8.7-billion figure for missing personal-income taxes "is likely an underestimate of the true … tax gap."

Other countries have estimated their own tax gaps, including the United Kingdom, the United States, Sweden and Australia, and each highlight the uncertainty of their own numbers.

Percy Downe
P.E.I. Senator Percy Downe has been pressing the government since at least 2012 to measure the tax gap, as done by other countries such as the U.S. (Steve Bruce/CBC)

In the past the Canada Revenue Agency has resisted producing such estimates for Canada, partly out of concern that any reported gap might be construed as a work target for them to achieve, even though the math is uncertain.

The agency has also declined to carry out random audits of the population of taxpayers because of the expense, preferring to focus on specific sectors of the economy considered more likely to dodge taxes. The absence of random audits creates another analytical hurdle for tax-gap estimations.

'The tax gap is sometimes seen as a measure of tax fraud or similar conduct.' - Internal CRA document, cautioning that the gap can be for other reasons as well

Senator Percy Downe among others has been pressing the CRA for a tax-gap estimation, and in 2012 formally asked the parliamentary budget officer for such a study — partly to derive an estimate of federal revenue lost to overseas tax havens.

The PBO tried without success to get data from the tax agency to carry out the study, information the CRA said would cost $140,000 and six months to produce, say documents obtained by CBC News under the Access to Information Act.

The dispute escalated to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in late 2015. The PBO project was eventually dropped with Downe's agreement, and the CRA announced on April 11, 2016, it would undertake the research itself.

For perspective, Friday's report on the personal income tax gap says the missing $8.7 billion in taxes represents about 6.4 per cent of all personal income tax collected in 2014. The Finance Canada report last June came up with a similar number: the $4.9 billion in uncollected GST/HST in 2014 represents about 6.5 per cent of all GST/HST revenues.

Can be taxpayer error


On Monday, CRA officials will join international tax experts for a two-day seminar in Ottawa, sponsored by the Canadian Tax Foundation, which will examine issues surrounding the measurement of tax gaps. Specialists from the U.S., U.K. and Sweden are expected.

G20/TAXHAVENS
Ugland House is the registered office of some 18,000 companies on Grand Cayman Island, an offshore tax haven. The latest CRA report does not include a calculation of taxes lost because of offshore schemes, saying it will release those calculations next year. (Reuters)

"Broadly defined, the tax gap is the difference between the tax that would be paid if all obligations were fully met in all instances, and the tax actually paid," says an internal CRA document, cautioning that the gap does not necessarily reflect illegal behaviour.

"The tax gap is sometimes seen as a measure of tax fraud or similar conduct. However, it encompasses revenues lost due to both intentional and unintentional behaviour, including tax evasion, taxpayer error, and in some cases unpaid and uncollectable liabilities, such as when a taxpayer is bankrupt."

Follow @DeanBeeby on Twitter

Oh My My Mr Prime Minister Trudeau "The Younger" is showing us his nasty arse a lot lately N'esy Pas?

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/privy-council-prime-minister-s-office-secrecy-gag-security-information-wark-1.4139309

Liberals grow the ranks of permanently gagged public servants


1453 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.



Tony Adams 
Tony Adams
Remember when people said Harper gaged public servants and didn't allow free speech for them? So why is ok now under Justin Trudeau? Or will the "but Harper!" excuse come into play with this as well?



David Raymond Amos
David Raymond Amos
@Tony Adams Just so ya know neither Cretien, Martin, Harper and now Trudeau "The Younger" could put a gag on me.

I proved it in spades during the hearing held on May 24th, 2017 in the Federal Court of Appeal in Fredericton New Brunswick. Anyone can query the Federal Court Docket to verify what I say is true.



Darren MacDonald
Darren MacDonald
@David Raymond Amos Did you get your $13M settlement and apology from the Queen yet?



David Raymond Amos
David Raymond Amos
@Tony Adams I repeat Mr Prime Minister "The Younger" and his buddy Harper could not put a gag on me Query the dockets of Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal with my whole name.

There was a Hell of a hearing on May 24th, 2017 nobody will talk about.




Liberals grow the ranks of permanently gagged public servants

The Privy Council Office recently bound another 94 current and former staffers to a lifetime of secrecy

By Dean Beeby, CBC News Posted: Jun 01, 2017 5:00 AM ET
 
The Liberals under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau recently increased the number of public servants subject to a lifetime gag order.
The Liberals under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau recently increased the number of public servants subject to a lifetime gag order. (Jonathan Hayward/Canadian Press) 

The Liberal government has been expanding the number of public servants subject to lifetime gag orders, placing them under threat of hefty prison sentences should they spill any secrets before they die.

Since December, the Privy Council Office has designated at least 94 individuals, some of whom no longer work for the federal government, as "persons permanently bound to secrecy" or PPBS — a binding legal order intended to enforce their silence.

The group all had access to confidential, security-related information while working at the Privy Council Office or the Prime Minister's Office, and some were served with official notice of the gag order after they had left their jobs.

Each of them was individually identified by their boss or former boss as knowing secrets about national security, and therefore requiring a gag order that is retroactive — preventing them from talking about their work before the gag order was issued.

Each was also presented with a three-page notice to sign and return, many using a pre-paid, pre-addressed envelope that was enclosed.

CBC News learned about the latest round of lifetime gag orders through a request under the Access to Information Act, and some details have been confirmed by a government spokesperson.

Gagged for life


A heavily redacted memorandum for the clerk of the Privy Council dated Dec. 19, 2016, also shows another 145 Privy Council Office staffers have been subject to blanket gag orders under the Security of Information Act since 2014 because of the nature of their roles.

These individuals were automatically gagged for life because they work in units that are designated as sensitive and are routinely exposed to secrets, unlike the 94 who were selectively added to the gag list because they are only sometimes given secret information.


The Privy Council Office declined to provide more information about the 94, including how many may have worked in former prime minister Stephen Harper's office.

"Further disclosure of information could lead to security risks, potentially placing Canadians at risk," spokesperson Paul Duchesne said in an email.

The briefing note for the clerk indicates the Privy Council Office expects to add about 30 individuals each year to the ranks of "persons permanently bound to secrecy."

A separate group of more than 200 Canadian military personnel and federal workers have also been hit with lifetime gag orders since early last year. These individuals all work in the controversial program to replace Canada's fighter jets.

Question Period 20161027
After a formal question submitted in the House of Commons by Conservative MP James Bezan, the government acknowledged more than 200 public servants have been gagged for life regarding their work in procuring new fighter jets. (Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)

The number was elicited by Conservative defence critic James Bezan through a formal House of Commons procedure that requires a minister to answer an MP's question. Insiders called the gag orders an extraordinary and unnecessary measure.

Of the 235 staffers disclosed to Bezan, 121 work for National Defence and 13 work for the Privy Council Office. It's not clear whether any of the 13 at Privy Council are also counted in the clerk's memo.

Myth of the 'eternal secret'


In total, these most recent reports add at least another 361 public servants who risk up to 14 years in prison if they ever discuss the secrets of their time in government, whether in memoirs or at family reunions.

Security and intelligence historian Wesley Wark says the gagging system under the Security of Information Act of 2001 is unworkable and poorly conceived.

It "rests on an idea that there is such a thing as a permanent or eternal secret," the University of Ottawa professor said. "This is clearly a myth and an unhelpful one."

Wesley Wark
Wesley Wark, a security and intelligence historian at the University of Ottawa, says the gag provisions of the Security of Information Act are outdated and rob Canadians of their history.

He says the concept "robs Canada of an ability to learn from the experience of officials with a deep knowledge of security and intelligence issues" and "creates a chill around the publication of memoirs and other forms of organized memory and commentary."

"It is a very old-fashioned system, rooted in long-ago British practice and has not been updated."

Wark says the law needs to be rewritten to ensure the gag provisions apply only to select categories of highly sensitive intelligence, among other reforms.

But Duchesne of the PCO says there are no plans to change the system.

"Designation of PMO and PCO employees will continue, as required in the interests of security," he said.

"Both PCO and PMO take the protection of information very seriously, which is why both ensure that those who have access to special operational information are permanently bound to secrecy."


On May 11, historians and their supporters launched a petition to the federal government, calling for millions of documents that have spent decades in departmental filing cabinets to be turned over to Library and Archives Canada.

The petition's initiator, Dennis Molinaro of Trent University, told CBC News "the government seems to be, in essence, running some kind of secret or shadow archive."

Follow @DeanBeeby on Twitter

 

Thursday, 1 June 2017

Wayne Easter and Banksters

Former staff to blow whistle to MPs about bank practices


http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/banks-finance-mps-sales-1.4140668

  
238 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.


David Raymond Amos 
David Raymond Amos
Perhaps folks within "Gopublic" should read the email from me that they acknowledged yesterday? Anyone can Google three words in order to view and read a letter posted within my old blog long ago. Perhaps then maybe CBC will ask Wayne Easter and his cohorts who I am and what of my concerns correct?

Those three words are as follows:

Harper and Bankers


 Joseph Cluster 
Joseph Cluster
It's clear the problem isn't a few disgruntled employees that have been let go that are complaining it's thousands of stressed out employees that have come forward to complain. So there's a huge problem, fix it, how? It's time that the banking industry gets a little spanking they're just too big for their britches.


David Raymond Amos
David Raymond Amos
@Joseph Cluster "It's time that the banking industry gets a little spanking they're just too big for their britches."

That is an understatement to say the very least


Dan Cooper
Dan Cooper @Aaron Morris

"That's your pension you're talking about. Now that you're informed, don't be one of the suckers. That's all there is to it"

No. I don't want to be stolen from just because the thief plans on giving me back a bit of my money when I retire.

Time to bring down the wages/bonuses of those at the top.

Obviously banks can't afford to be paying them so much anyways. BTW any monkey can annually just increase fees...do people really need to be paid 7 figures to do what a computer algorithm can?
 


David Raymond Amos
David Raymond Amos
@Dan Cooper I am still battling Trudeau "The Younger" and his many minions today just to get my old age pension and CPP and I turn 65 next month. The dummies deny my entitlments as a Canadain Citizen just because I ran against them 5 times while trying to expose bank fraud and tax fraud etc. Before you doubt me just Google

David Amos Bank Fraud

You will find documents that most IRS agents or banksters know exist


Joseph Cluster 
Joseph Cluster
Having made a slim $35 Billion in profits for the 2015 year the banks believe they stand above the law it seems when it comes to forcing their employees to do unlawful acts. Maybe its time to levy huge fines on them, so it goes back to the little people who have been service charged into the poor house.


Seth Whittaker
Seth Whittaker
@Joseph Cluster
Do you hear that ? That's the worlds smallest violin playing for you

Michael Murphy
Michael Murphy
@Seth Whittaker "Do you hear that ? That's the worlds smallest violin playing for you"

Right wingers defending criminals, shocking! Well not really

David Raymond Amos
David Raymond Amos
@Michael Murphy So says a dude with exactly the same name as a very questionable former Liberal Attorney General who quit for no believable reason then came back to try to be a party leader??? Need I say Hmmm?



David Raymond Amos
David Raymond Amos
@Joseph Cluster It you wish to do some more research then perhaps you should Google

Harper and Bankers

Then my whole name


 Bryan Danielson 
Bryan Danielson
Coming out of 2008 Canadian banks emerged with a reputation worldwide as safe and responsible institutions. The disgraceful greed of these executives seized that opportunity to become the ultimate parasites while the nation collectively let their guard down.


David Raymond Amos
David Raymond Amos
@Bryan Danielson That is just spin in 2008 Harper kinda sorta bailed them out as well. Our Banksters are just as evil as all the rest if not worse.


 Ben Hague 
Ben Hague
Funny about a couple of comments yesterday by former bank employees & financial advisors could not believe thiese illegal practices happened in banks.Sure & they give out free money every April 1 .


David Raymond Amos
David Raymond Amos 
@Ben Hague On April 1st 2003 for the benefit of bankster 2 Secret Agents working for the US Treasury Dept paid me a visit with a herd of cops late in the evening after I had received 4 judgements in my favour within two lawsuits suing their fellow agents.

They weren't fooling that night and neither am I today. Furthermore our Solicitor General at the time, Wayne Easter and his minions with the RCMP knew all about it way back then. Easter played dumb ever since particular when I sued the Crown in 2015 while we were both running for public office again.

Doubt me? If so just Google two names David Amos and Wayne Easter and follow where your mouse points around the Internet



http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/02/methinks-trumps-lawyers-mcghan-and_63.html


Sunday, 26 February 2017
Methinks Trump's lawyers McGhan and Cohen should explain why I am
suing the Queen before he meets her N'esy Pas Mr Prime Minister
Trudeau "The Younger"??

---------- Original message ----------
From: Póstur FOR
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 19:04:19 +0000
Subject: Re: Yo John E. Kelly of the DHS your latest boss President
Trump and his evil White House lawyers Cohen & McGahn why I don't give
a damn about Yankee secrets EH?
To: David Amos


Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið  / Your request has been received

Kveðja / Best regards
Forsætisráðuneytið  / Prime Minister's Office


---------- Original message ----------
From: Lotus Notes Administrator
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 14:02:48 -0500
Subject: Donald F McGahn is no longer with Jones Day - Message deleted
To: David Amos

Donald F McGahn is no longer with Jones Day.  For reasons of
confidentiality, your email was automatically deleted by our email system
before being read. Please re-send any Jones Day business related email to
msowardsnewton@jonesday.com. Megan Sowards Newton can be reached at
+1-202-879-3986.

Regards,

Jones Day Postmaster


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 15:02:43 -0400
Subject: Yo John E. Kelly of the DHS your latest boss President Trump
and his evil White House lawyers Cohen & McGahn why I don't give a
damn about Yankee secrets EH?
To: john.e.kelly@tsa.dhs.gov, "James.Comey" , dmcgahn , president ,
djtjr , mcohen , "bob.paulson" , "Greta.Bossenmaier" , "mark.vespucci"
, washington field , "Boston.Mail"
Cc: David Amos , "hon.ralph.goodale" , mdcohen212@gmail.com, birgittaj
, postur , "theresa.may.mp" , freedomtalkradio2013 , "Dale.Morgan" ,
"dale.drummond"

Perhaps you should also ask Bush's former members of the "Coalition of
the Willing" in Iceland and the UK why you dudes in the DHS threatened
to take me to your secretive prison in Cuba on April 1st, 2003 with
the knowledge and blessing of the the RCMP after they helped Yankees
bomb the Hell out of Iraq for a bullshit reason the nobody will ever
understand. Weapons of mass destruction yea right.

 You Yankee bastards and your constant wars and talk of more wars are
the ones we all should be concerned about.

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/02/methinks-trumps-lawyers-mcghan-and_63.html

Sunday, 26 February 2017
Methinks Trump's lawyers McGhan and Cohen should explain why I am
suing the Queen before he meets her N'esy Pas Mr Prime Minister
Trudeau "The Younger"??


Hey Mr Prime Minister Trudeau "The Younger" perhaps you should have
your very nasty and very greedy assistants Gerald Butts and Katie
Telford or all your minions within the Queen's and the evil lawyer
David Johnson's oh so secretive Privy Council Office scroll down to
review whose computers acted ethically today EH?

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Kelly, John" John.Kelly@dhs.gov
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 18:25:14 +0000
Subject: RE: New response to your FOI request - Do You know who I am
and why I have a lawsuit against your Queen?
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com

Sir,

I believe you have addressed and sent your email to the wrong John
Kelly.  I am not the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security.

I suggest that you should seek out and identify the correct electronic
message address for the intended recipient you want to address.

Please note that, I am not at liberty to provide you with any email
addresses and I respectfully ask you to remove my email address from
your contact list and any distribution lists.

Thank you in advance.

V/r,

John E. Kelly


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 09:53:07 -0400
Subject: RE: New response to your FOI request - Do You know who I am
and why I have a lawsuit against your Queen?
To: team@whatdotheyknow.com, boris.johnson.mp@parliament.uk,

theresa.may.mp@parliament.uk, pm@pm.gc.ca, postur@for.is,
Elizabeth.Denham@ico.org.uk, freedomtalkradio2013@gmail.com,
Field Mcconnell fieldmcc@yahoo.com, James.Comey@ic.fbi.gov,
bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca,
John.Kelly@dhs.gov, alanmdransfield@gmail.com,
B.English@ministers.govt.nz, philip.hammond.mp@parliament.uk,
public.enquiries@hmtreasury.gsi.gov.uk, jo.johnson.mp@parliament.uk,
Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca,
Jody.Wilson-Raybould.a1@parl.gc.ca,  Malcolm.Turnbull.MP@aph.gov.au,
elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, press@bankofengland.co.uk,
Andrew.Bailey@fca.org.uk, oig@sec.gov, premier@gnb.ca,
brian.gallant@gnb.ca,
brian.maude@nbsc-cvmnb.ca, rjgillis@gmglaw.com,
curtis@marinerpartners.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca, Robert.Jones@cbc.ca, newsroom@globeandmail.ca,
news@kingscorecord.com, nmoore@bellmedia.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca

I see nothing wrong with posting true facts and seeking answers. Why
do you people?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: WhatDoTheyKnow team@whatdotheyknow.com
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 13:07:04 +0000
Subject: New response to your FOI request - Do You know who I am and
why I have a lawsuit against your Queen?
To: David Raymond Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com

You have a new response to the Freedom of Information request
'Do You know who I am and why I have a lawsuit against your Queen?'
that you made to Attorney General’s Office.

To view the response, click on the link below.

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/do_you_know_who_i_am_and_why_i_h?nocache=incoming-943496#incoming-943496

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/donald-trump-uk-us-crown-queen-1.3990696
Trump and the Crown: Brits unsettled over U.S. president getting royal treatment
Planned state visit subject of protest, U.K. Commons debate today
By Nahlah Ayed, CBC News Posted: Feb 20, 2017 5:00 AM ET

It was enough to prompt one fellow Tory to table a motion of
no-confidence in the Commons to have Bercow ousted for breaking the
rule of speaker's neutrality.

ETC ETC ETC

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/02/re-fatca-nafta-tpp-etc-attn-president.html



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:51:14 -0400
Subject: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump I
just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
does he lie to me after all this time???
To: president@whitehouse.gov, mdcohen212@gmail.com, pm@pm.gc.ca,
Pierre-Luc.Dusseault@parl.gc.ca, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca,
Jean-Yves.Duclos@parl.gc.ca, B.English@ministers.govt.nz,
Malcolm.Turnbull.MP@aph.gov.au, pminvites@pmc.gov.au,
mayt@parliament.uk, press@bankofengland.co.uk,
Andrew.Bailey@fca.org.uk,
fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca,
newsroom@globeandmail.ca, llionel@lionelmedia.com,
CNN.Viewer.Communications.Management@cnn.com, news-tips@nytimes.com,
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca,
justin.ling@vice.com, elizabeththompson@ipolitics.ca,
djtjr@trumporg.com, Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, postur@for.is,
stephen.kimber@ukings.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca,
oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com

---------- Original message ----------
From: Michael Cohen mcohen@trumporg.com
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:15:14 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA ATTN Pierre-Luc.Dusseault I just
called and left a message for you
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com

Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
directed to 646-853-0114.
________________________________
This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its
affiliates.Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an
electronic signature under applicable law.

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:15:04 -0400
Subject: RE FATCA ATTN Pierre-Luc.Dusseault I just called and left a
message for you
To: Pierre-Luc.Dusseault@parl.gc.ca, david@lutz.nb.ca,
Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc.ca, mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
curtis@marinerpartners.com, rick.hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, djtjr@trumporg.com,
mcohen@trumporg.com, elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, ht.lacroix@cbc.ca,
hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca

Trust that Trump, CBC and everybody else knows that I speak and act
Pro Se particularly when dealing with the Evil Tax Man

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/taxes-internal-revenue-service-fatca-united-states-1.3954789?__vfz=profile_comment%3D7320800006927

Transfer of Canadian banking records to U.S. tax agency doubled last year

Documents for thousands of Canadian residents transferred under controversial FATCA legislation

By Elizabeth Thompson, CBC News Posted: Jan 29, 2017 5:00 AM ET

The Canadian government sent twice as many banking records of Canadian residents to the IRS in 2016 as it did in 2015.
The Canadian government sent twice as many banking records of Canadian residents to the IRS in 2016 as it did in 2015. (Susan Walsh/Associated Press)

Banking records of more than 315,000 Canadian residents were turned over to the U.S. Internal Revenue Service last year under a controversial information sharing deal, CBC News has learned.

That is double the number transferred in the deal's first year.

The Canada Revenue Agency transmitted 315,160 banking records to the IRS on Sept. 28, 2016 — a 104 per cent increase over the 154,667 records the agency sent in September 2015.

Lisa Damien, spokeswoman for the CRA, attributed the increase to the fact it was the second year for the Canada-U.S. information sharing deal that was sparked by the U.S. Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA).

"The exchange in September 2015 was based on accounts identified by financial institutions at the time," she said. "The number of reported accounts was expected to increase in 2016, because the financial institutions have had more time to complete their due diligence and identify other reportable accounts."

Trudeau Nuclear Summit 20160331
Prior to coming to power, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau opposed the agreement to share banking records of Canadian residents with the IRS. He has since changed his position. (Sean Kilpatrick/Canadian Press)

The transmission of banking records of Canadian residents is the result of an agreement worked out in 2014 between Canada and the U.S. after the American government adopted FATCA. The U.S. tax compliance act requires financial institutions around the world to reveal information about bank accounts in a bid to crack down on tax evasion by U.S. taxpayers with foreign accounts.

Dual citizens, long-term visitors affected


The deal requires financial institutions to share the banking records of those considered to be "U.S. persons" for tax purposes — regardless of whether they are U.S. citizens.

Among the people who can be considered by the IRS as "U.S. persons" are Canadians born in the U.S., dual citizens or even those who spend more than a certain number of days in the United States each year.

Former prime minister Stephen Harper's government argued that given the penalties the U.S. was threatening to impose, it had no choice but to negotiate the information sharing deal. The former government said it was able to exempt some types of accounts from the information transfer.

CRA
The Canada Revenue Agency transfers banking records of people believed to be 'U.S. persons' to the IRS. (Sean Kilpatrick/Canadian Press)

The Canada Revenue Agency triggered controversy after it transferred the first batch of Canadian banking records to the IRS in September 2015 in the midst of the election campaign, without waiting for an assessment by Canada's privacy commissioner or the outcome of a legal challenge to the agreement's constitutionality.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Treasury Board President Scott Brison and Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale have dropped calls to scrap the deal, which they had made before the Liberals came to power.

Watchdog wants proactive notification


Privacy Commissioner Daniel Therrien has raised concerns about the information sharing, questioning whether financial institutions are reporting more accounts than necessary. Under the agreement, financial institutions only have to report accounts belonging to those believed to be U.S. persons if they contain more than $50,000.

Therrien has also suggested the CRA proactively notify individuals that their financial records had been shared with the IRS. However, the CRA has been reluctant to agree to Therrien's suggestion.

Racial Profiling 20160107
Privacy Commissioner Daniel Therrien has questioned whether the CRA is transmitting more banking records to the IRS than is necessary. (Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)

NDP revenue critic Pierre-Luc Dusseault said the increase in the number of files transferred was "surprising," and he questioned whether financial institutions are only sharing records of accounts worth more than $50,000.

"I don't see how there would be 150,000 more accounts reportable to the IRS in one year. It is something I will look into."

Dusseault said the CRA should notify every Canadian resident whose banking records are shared with the IRS.

Lynne Swanson, of the Alliance for the Defence of Canadian Sovereignty, which is challenging the information sharing agreement in Federal Court, said she has no idea why the number of banking records shared with the IRS doubled.

Youngest MP 20110519
NDP revenue critic Pierre-Luc Dusseault says the CRA should notify every Canadian resident whose banking records are shared with the IRS. (Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)

"It still seems low in comparison to the number of Canadians that are affected by this," she said. "It is estimated that a million Canadians are affected by this."

Hopes for repeal


Swanson hopes that U.S. President Donald Trump, or Congress — which is now controlled by the Republican Party — will scrap FATCA. The Republican platform pledged to do away with the information collecting legislation.

"FATCA not only allows 'unreasonable search and seizures' but also threatens the ability of overseas Americans to lead normal lives," the platform reads. "We call for its repeal and for a change to residency-based taxation for U.S. citizens overseas."

Swanson's group is also hoping the Federal Court of Canada will intervene, although a date has not yet been set for a hearing.

"A foreign government is essentially telling the Canadian government how Canadian citizens and Canadian residents should be treated. It is a violation of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms."

Elizabeth Thompson can be reached at elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca

Former staff to blow whistle to MPs about bank practices

Finance committee hearings start Monday into practices revealed by CBC's Go Public

By Elizabeth Thompson, CBC News Posted: Jun 01, 2017 5:00 AM ET

The practices of Canada's big banks will be in the spotlight when the House of Commons finance committee kicks off hearings Monday.
The practices of Canada's big banks will be in the spotlight when the House of Commons finance committee kicks off hearings Monday. (CBC) 

The House of Commons finance committee will kick off hearings into the practices of Canada's big banks on Monday with testimony from former bank employees ready to blow the whistle on some of the things they have witnessed.

In an interview with CBC News Wednesday, shortly after the committee drafted its witness list, Liberal MP and committee chairman Wayne Easter said he is hoping the former employees will shed light on the practices of the country's major financial institutions.

"I understand that they are retired and they're not fearful of expressing their point of view, and I think that will be helpful to the committee."

While Easter didn't provide names of those being invited to appear, he said some are retired and some have moved to other employers. Those who testify before the committee will have parliamentary immunity, he said.

The hearings come in the wake of a series of stories by CBC's Go Public in which bank employees described questionable practices by some of Canada's biggest banks. The employees have alleged things like pressure on employees to meet ever-increasing sales targets, signing clients up for services without informing them, and forging signatures and initials.

Wayne Easter
Finance committee chairman Wayne Easter says former bank employees who testify Monday will benefit from parliamentary immunity. (Steve Bruce/CBC)

To date, thousands of bank employees have contacted CBC, describing stress-inducing pressure to increase sales.

Easter said the hearings are expected to stretch over three meetings of the finance committee. Government agencies that regulate the banks, as well as the Canadian Banking Association, are being asked to appear Wednesday afternoon, while representatives of Canada's big banks are to appear the following Monday.

Beyond shedding light on what is happening in the banks, Easter said the committee will also look at who should be regulating the practices being alleged, and whether it is a question of financial practices or labour issues.


"I'm still trying to determine who has the authority to deal with this problem. Is it the regulators? Is it the labour code? Is it the Bank Act? Just what can we do at the end of the day."

If the committee finds there are problems, Easter said it can recommend that the government act.

"Part of the responsibility of the committee, at the end of the day, is if there are serious concerns here, is to find the road map or to propose a road map [so] that there can be a resolve to the issue — if in fact there are bad practices taking place."

Youngest MP 20110519
Pierre-Luc Dusseault, NDP MP for Sherbrooke, says the committee will be hearing from front line employees in big banks. (Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)

NDP MP Pierre-Luc Dusseault, who initially proposed the hearings, said the former bank employees who will testify are people who were on the front lines.

"When I talk about those who have worked in the banks, I'm not talking about former presidents of the banks, executives or managers. I'm talking about people who experienced those kinds of practices daily from their employer."


Elizabeth Thompson can be reached at elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca