Sécurité publique
et de la Protection civile.
retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assuré
que votre
message sera examiné avec soin.
Public Safety and
Emergency Preparedness.
processing your email. Rest assured that your message will
be
carefully reviewed.
843-6394.
843-6394.
Liliana Longo,
Q.C., c.r.
Please note that I will be away from the office for an indeterminate
period.
Sgt. Jackie Basque will be acting on my behalf and can be reached
by
email or by phone at 452-2448 or 470-4210 (cell).
Please also note
that I will not be replying to any messages.
Ssgt. Gilles
Blinn
Veuillez noter que je serai absent du bureau
pour une période indéterminée.
En mon absence, Sgt Jackie Basque agira par
intérim.
par cell. au 470-4210.
Veuillez aussi noter que je ne donnerai
suite à aucun message.
S.é-m. Gilles Blinn
of Justice
and Attorney General of Canada.
processing your email. Rest assured that your message will
be
carefully reviewed.
justice et procureur
général du Canada.
un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Nous tenons
à vous
assurer que votre message sera lu avec soin.
I will
be away from the office March 1, 2017 until June 5, 2017.
,
for assistance. Ginette Mazerolle
will be acting in my absence.
Je
serais absent du bureau le 1 mars 2017 jusqu'au 5 juin 2017.
Veuillez
contacter Monique Lefebvre au (902) 426-5804 ou par courriel,
monique.lefebvre@justice.gc.ca,
pour assistance. Ginette Mazerolle
agira de façon intérimaire pendant mon
absence.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Jensen,
Jan"
jan.jensen@justice.gc.caTo:
david.raymond.amos@gmail.comDate:
Wed, 31 May 2017 23:14:13 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Clearly Chucky
Leblanc knows Justice Richard
Bell and I very well N'esy Pas?
I will
be out of the office until Monday June 5, 2017 and I will have
limited access
to email during that time. If you require immediate
assistance, please
contact my assistant at (902) 426 1798.
---------- Original message
----------
From: "Joly, Mélanie (PCH)"
hon.melanie.joly@canada.caTo:
david.raymond.amos@gmail.comDate:
Wed, 31 May 2017 23:15:54 +0000
Subject: Accusé de réception / Acknowledge
Receipt
Merci d’avoir écrit à l’honorable Mélanie Joly, ministre du
Patrimoine canadien.
La ministre est toujours heureuse de prendre
connaissance des
commentaires de Canadiens sur des questions d’importance
pour eux.
Votre courriel sera lu avec soin.
Si votre courriel porte
sur une demande de rencontre ou une invitation
à une activité particulière,
nous tenons à vous assurer que votre
demande a été notée et qu’elle recevra
toute l’attention voulue.
**********************
Thank you for
writing to the Honourable Mélanie Joly, Minister of
Canadian
Heritage.
The Minister is always pleased to hear the comments of
Canadians on
subjects of importance to them. Your email will be read with
care.
If your email relates to a meeting request or an invitation to
a
specific event, please be assured that your request has been noted
and
will be given every consideration.
---------- Original message
----------
From: Go public
gopublic@cbc.caTo:
david.raymond.amos@gmail.comDate:
Wed, 31 May 2017 16:14:21 -0700
Subject: Thank you Re: Clearly Chucky Leblanc
knows Justice Richard
Bell and I very well N'esy Pas?
Hi - and thanks
so much for writing to Go Public.
This is an automatic
response.
We read all of our emails promptly - and we really appreciate
your submission.
If your story is one we think we can tackle, we will get
back to you
soon, by phone or email. In the meantime, you can really help us
by
sending the following, if you haven't already:
-A brief but very
specific description of what the story is
-Phone number where we can reach
you (cell included please)
-The most relevant, key
documentation/correspondence/
pictures/video
(re the situation you want
us to look into)
Please note:
Because we get a large number of
submissions, we will only get back to
you if your story is something we can
consider taking on.
Thanks so much for your
understanding.
Cheers,
Erica Johnson, Reporter
Rosa
Marchitelli, Reporter
Rachel Ward, Producer
James Roberts,
Producer
---------- Original message ----------
From:
david.raymond.amos@gmail.comDate:
Wed, 31 May 2017 17:13:43 -0600
Subject: Clearly Chucky Leblanc knows Justice
Richard Bell and I very
well N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos
motomaniac333@gmail.com,
jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca,
bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca,
david.hansen@justice.gc.ca,
mcu@justice.gc.ca,
Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca,
bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
oldmaison@yahoo.com,
andre@jafaust.com,
gopublic@cbc.ca,
Whistleblower@ctv.ca,
Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca,
Jonathan.Vance@forces.gc.ca,
jkee@google.com,
DDrummond@google.com,
ht.lacroix@cbc.ca,
sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca,
hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca,
jean-pierre.blais@crtc.gc.ca,
martine.turcotte@bell.caCc:
political.financing@elections.ca,
Yves.Cote@elections.ca,
mdcohen212@gmail.com,
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov,
jbosnitch@gmail.comhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BU3kcK6RdL8David
Amos Federal Court Date is today at 2:00pm at the Federal Building!!!
Charles
Leblanc
Published on May 23, 2017
http://charlesotherpersonalitie.blogspot.ca/2017/05/federal-judge-richard-bell-is.htmlWednesday,
31 May 2017
Federal Judge Richard Bell is confronted by the Pain in the
Ass Blogger!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGCRGOKV3UUPosted
by Charles Leblanc at 2:50 pm
Date: 20151223
Docket:
T-1557-15
Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
PRESENT:
The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND
AMOS
Plaintiff
and
HER MAJESTY THE
QUEEN
Defendant
ORDER
(Delivered orally from the Bench in
Fredericton, New Brunswick, on December
14, 2015)
The Plaintiff seeks
an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to the
Federal Courts Rules
(SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November 12, 2015,
in which Prothonotary
Morneau struck the Statement of Claim in its entirety.
At the outset of
the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a letter
dated September
10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then capacity as Past
President of the
New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian Bar Association, and
the then President
of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg, (now a Justice of the New
Brunswick Court of
Appeal). In that letter he stated:
As for your past President, Mr. Bell,
may I suggest that you check the work
of Frank McKenna before I sue your
entire law firm including you. You are
your brother’s keeper.
Frank
McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former colleague
of mine
at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to expressing an
intention to
sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of people in his
Motion Record who
he appears to contend may be witnesses or potential
parties to be added.
Those individuals who are known to me personally,
include, but are not
limited to the former Prime Minister of Canada, The
Right Honourable Stephen
Harper; former Attorney General of Canada and now a
Justice of the Manitoba
Court of Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of
Parliament Rob Moore;
former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant
Garneau; former Chief of
the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight;
former Staff Sergeant Danny
Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick
Court of Appeal, Justices
Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
Assistant Commissioner
Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.
In the circumstances,
given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my personal
capacity and my past and
present relationship with many potential witnesses
and/or potential parties
to the litigation, I am of the view there would be
a reasonable apprehension
of bias should I hear this motion. See Justice de
Grandpré’s dissenting
judgment in Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v
National Energy Board
et al, [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable
test regarding
allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither
party has
requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
AS
A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
the Court
schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.
There is no order as
to costs.
“B. Richard Bell”
Judge
Have a look at how many
times Chucky Leblanc is mentioned in my lawsuit
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.htmlFriday,
18 September 2015
David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown
T-1557-15
27. The Plaintiff states that the Sergeant-at-Arms, two
Commissionaires, a
librarian, and two members of the FPF knew that the
Plaintiff was in
legislative assembly on June 24, 2004 looking for the
“blogger” Charles
Leblanc. While the Plaintiff was waiting for Charles
Leblanc to arrive that
day he exercised his democratic right to witness the
proceedings of the
Legislative Assembly from the gallery.
28. The
Plaintiff states that apparently a friend of the Crown put a new
spin on this
matter the following day. The Crown’s corporate media has never
said anything
about the Crown’s malicious actions barring him it has had
lots to say about
the barring the blogger Charles Leblanc two years later
and it has made the
arrests and prosecutions of him well known. On June 25,
2004 Charles Leblanc
a well-known friend of the MLAs, the Sergeant-at-Arms,
the Commissionaires,
the RCMP and the Fredericton Police Force falsely
reported in the social
media that the Plaintiff had been “shown the door”
claiming that he had
attempted to interrupt the proceedings in the
Legislature by speaking from
the gallery. The Crown knows if that were true
it would have been recorded in
the legislative records. The words of Charles
Leblanc an important witness to
be called to testify as to what he knows
about this matter are as
follows
“IS ELVY ROBICHAID SEEING THE LIGHT????
by
Charles LeBlanc Friday, Jun. 25, 2004 at 10:56 AM
Fredericton updates
from Charles
“There’s always undercovers cops around but only when
the House is in
session. As God as my witness I hope nothing happens but
it’s just a matter
of time till someone is push over the edge. I guess a guy
name David Amos
was shown the door yesterday at the Legislature. This guy is
running as an
Independent candidate in the riding of Fundy Royal. I met the
guy over the
net and he has a beef with our political bureaucrats. I admire
people
fighting for what they believe in but you can’t get carried away. I
guess in
this case? He wanted to speak from the Gallery and that’s a big faux
pas!”
32. The Plaintiff states that many politicians knew that the
CBC had hard
copy of two lawsuits of his since 2002 and their journalists had
been
laughing at him for two years. It was a profound mistake for CBC to
ignore
his candidacy now that he did as he promised in a statement of one
lawsuit
and was running for public office in Canada. As CBC continued serving
the
interests of the politicians who provided the funding sourced from
the
Canadian taxpayer other citizens noticed that the CBC was ignoring
his
candidacy. One journalist who had laughed at him called back and tried
to
make a deal after the Plaintiff had called the Ombudsman for CBC
complaining
of him and his associates only to be laughed at some more and
invited to sue
CBC. CBC continued to ignore the Plaintiff even though the
popular former
CBC reporter Mike Duffy was now employed by their largest
corporate
competitor, CTV and they claimed Fundy was a riding to watch and at
least
three newspapers and even the CBC’s blogger friend Charles Leblanc
had
chosen to put his strange spin the actions and words of the Plaintiff
while
calling him a Hells Angel. However, the aforementioned CBC journalist
did
not keep his job very long after his boss and three directors of
CBC
received the very same documents and CD that the Plaintiff’s
political
opponents had in their possession. (The former CBC journalist did
get a job
with the government of NB and has continued with his obvious malice
ever
since)
33. The Plaintiff states that the CBC would not have
ignored its mandate
and the standing of a candidate if he or she were a
member of the Liberal
Party or the newly merged Conservative parties or the
Bloc Quebecois Party
or the Green Party or the New Democratic Party without
expecting to deal
with legions of lawyers. CBC had no legal right whatsoever
to ignore the
Plaintiff merely because he was an Independent. In fact the
mandate of CBC
as a publicly owned broadcaster dictates that he must not be
ignored whether
he be a member of a powerful political party or not. With
regards to this
complaint, on June 24, 2004 there were many journalists
inside the
legislative properties of NB not just CBC. They published nothing
about the
Plaintiff of his running for public office or his being barred or
even after
their blogger friend, Charles Leblanc certainly
did.
34. The Plaintiff states that in June of 2006 Charles Leblanc
was also
barred from the same legislative properties but not the Public
Documents
Building on the UNB campus. More importantly the Sergeant-at-Arms
was clever
enough not to sign or date the English only document this time.
Thus Charles
Leblanc who usually demands things in French from the government
when he is
in trouble was never barred at all. The CBC immediately reported
the barring
of Charles Leblanc falsely claiming that the Sergeant-at-Arms had
signed the
Barring Notice. CBC wrote the Sergeant-at-Arms admitted that he
had barred
about six others but did not disclose as to who they were. CBC did
not ask
who who the other citizens were because they knew they would have to
name
the Plaintiff as well. Many people have protested the barring of
Charles
Leblanc and a petition to have it revoked was placed in the public
record of
the legislative assembly to no avail. In 2006 Charles Leblanc was
arrested
in Saint John and in 2011 in Fredericton. In 2009 and 2012 the FPF
arrested
their blogging friend Charles Leblanc on the legislative properties.
The CBC
reported each time but failed to follow up and investigate and report
why
the Crown refused to charge Charles Leblanc in both instances. The CBC
knows
that as soon as the Plaintiff contacted the politicians and police to
remind
them that he would appreciate being called to testify at Charles
Leblanc’s
trial as a hostile but ethical witness about the barring actions of
the
Crown it would never go forward with the charges. Leblanc was arrested
by
the FPF two other times in recent years and he is on trial right now.
The
CBC knows the Plaintiff has talked to members of the RCMP, the FPF,
the
Saint John Police Force, the Miramichi Police Force and the
Edmundston
Police Force who were investigating Leblanc for various reasons
since 2006.
The police usually denied knowing who the Plaintiff was as they
refused to
answer his emails. The Plaintiff knows the reason why Charles
Leblanc was
barred from legislative property. He agrees with the Crown doing
so but it
failed to allow the nasty blogger the right to due process of law
just like
it did with and several others. He has never understood why the
Crown has
not charged Leblanc under sections 300 and 319 of the Criminal Code
in lieu
of arresting him for protesting too loudly or possible child porn
or
trespass or punching an equally nasty poetic beggar.
35. The
Plaintiff states that by the end of November of 2004 a lawyer in
the employ
of the Attorney General of NB had answered him in writing and the
FPF, two
lawyers, the Mayor and a city councilor of Fredericton had some
very serious
email exchanges with the Plaintiff. The only responses to the
Plaintiff
about the breach of his right to peaceful assembly came from the
(NBPC) on
September 14, 2004 acknowledging his complaint (File no
2110-04-11) and two
letters byway of email from the FPF. On September 30,
2004 a Staff Sergeant
of the FPF wrote that he was in possession of the
complaint and requested
evidence to support the Plaintiff’s statement that
he had been barred from
the legislative properties for “political reasons
not legal reasons” The
Plaintiff responded and suggested that the FPF listen
to the tape of the
interview he had with the NBPC and study all the evidence
he gave to the NBPC
in the presence of a lawyer as a witness. The Staff
Sergeant responded on
October 29, 2004 stating that he had detailed reports
from fellow members of
the FPF and he had interviewed the Sergeant-at-Arms.
He claimed that his
fellow police officers acted appropriately and he would
inform the Chief of
the FPF that he did not have sufficient cause under the
Police Act to
investigate the complaint the Plaintiff registered with the
NBPC against the
FPF. The Plaintiff pointed out that the conflict of
interest but grateful the
FPF acknowledged the incident. The Mayor of
Fredericton found no humour in
that fact and sent the Plaintiff many emails
within minutes no doubt in an
effort to overload his email account. In 2003
the Plaintiff had demanded the
Crown investigate the actions of RCMP now the
RCMP should do the same with
the Crown because that para-military police
force has jurisdiction everywhere
in Canada including all public and private
property controlled by the Crown
even military bases. The words of the
Sergeant-at-Arms, Commissionaires and
police were witnessed by only the
Plaintiff. A legal action about their
offences against his rights under the
Charter would boil down to their word
against his. Evidence was required
because he was outnumbered and attacked by
people the Crown employed to
understand the law. It was doubtful they would
act ethically and until June
16, 2006 the Crown refused to put anything in
writing to prove this claim
about the fact that the Plaintiff is barred from
parliamentary properties.
36. The Plaintiff states that the Crown is
aware that far greater offences
have been practiced within the Capital
District of NB by the FPF and the
RCMP against the Plaintiff. Many servants
of the Crown have challenged him
to seek relief in a Canadian provincial
court. The Plaintiff will not oblige
Crown attorneys of thier desires he will
file in a court of a country at a
time he chooses. Time is on the Plaintiff’s
side even though he getting old
and was finally allowed to collect his Canada
Pension. His children and
grandchildren are still very young. Whatever was
done against the Plaintiff
was done against his Clan as well. All of the
Plaintiff’s heirs are Canadian
citizens and two of them are American citizens
as well. The Crown, INTERPOL
and the American law enforcement authorities
cannot deny that there is no
statute of limitations on certain crimes. The
problem the Plaintiff is
finding an ethical journalist to report about the
legal actions that he and
the Crown have already been involved in since
1982.
37. The Plaintiff states that in October of 2004 if the Staff
Sergeant of
the FPF had listened to the tape of his interview with the NBPC
and studied
the documents they have in their possession he would not have
been so quick
to dismiss the Plaintiff and his concerns in such a fashion.
Their many
lawyers hardly ever allow corrupt police officers to admit that
the
Plaintiff exists or put their malice towards him in writing. The
Plaintiff
had explained to the NBPC what transpired on June 24th, 2004. To
explain
briefly the police should have known instantly the Sergeant-at-Arms
actions
were for political reasons as soon as he turned in the guest pass and
picked
up his documents as he stepped outside the building. While the
Plaintiff was
inside the legislative building he spoke to only three
employees two
Commissionaires and the librarian. He did not interfere with
the proceedings
in the House as he watched the MLAs and their assistants from
the gallery,
some of whom he knew personally. He did notice political pundits
in the
building. One Cabinet Minister’s assistant had been following him for
a
couple of days. His political foes wanted him off the property
immediately
but they knew that he was not shy of litigation if the Crown
attempted to
place a malicious charge against him. Therefore they elected
the
Sergeant-at-Arms to try bully the Plaintiff.
38. The
Plaintiff states that he satisfied himself as to the reasons behind
the
blatant malice once he asked Sergeant-at-Arms and the police three
questions
as follows:
(1) The Plaintiff first asked was why he was being
barred from the
legislative property. The Sergeant-at-Arms falsely claimed in
front of the
police that the Plaintiff had tried to serve documents on
somebody inside
the parliamentary building. The Commissionaires and police
knew that was
untrue because they all witnessed the fact that the Plaintiff
had left all
the documents in his possession with the Commissionaire at the
entrance
before he was allowed into the building and they all watched him
pick up the
same documents as he turned in a visitor’s pass after he was
asked to step
outside of the building.
(2) The second question was
to the police to see if they agreed to the
false claim of the
Sergeant-at-Arms and if they would identify themselves.
After the
Sergeant-at-Arms said something quickly in French and both police
officers
stated that they agreed with him but only one would state his name
and
rank.
(3) The Plaintiff then asked the Sergeant-at-Arms and the
police if they
thought they had jurisdiction over him. They all said yes but
refused to
take any documents from the Plaintiff just as the Deputy Prime
Minister
suggested.
39. The Plaintiff states that three people
who were mentioned during the
aforesaid meeting with the NBPC were Charles
Leblanc, Byron Prior and the
most wanted American gangster Whitey Bulger. All
three were well aware of
the Plaintiff and his actions. More importantly the
NBPC were made well
aware of the RCMP’s knowledge of his possession of many
American police
surveillance wiretap tapes. The NBPC were shown the very same
tapes that he
had promised to give to the Suffolk County District Attorney in
the
Dorchester District Court of Boston Massachusetts before a hearing
to
discuss an illegal summons to answer a malicious unsigned criminal
complaint
(Docket no. 0407CR004623). When the Plaintiff did so he was
falsely
imprisoned under the charges of “other”.
42. The
Plaintiff states that in 2014 a confidential letter from the lawyer
who is
now the chair of the NBPC was published by Charles Leblanc. Within
the
aforesaid letter by a lawyer who was an officer in the Canadian Forces
when
the Plaintiff was illegally barred in 2004 explained why he and some
other
unnamed lawyers claimed that the Chief of the FPF and the NBPC did not
have
jurisdiction over the legislative properties in order to investigate
the
wrongs of the members of FPF under the Police Act. The lawyers claimed
that
whereas the police were acting under the orders of the Sergeant-at-Arms
the
immunity afforded them by parliamentary privilege would be undermined if
the
Chief of the FPF and the NBPC upheld the law and the Charter.
67.
The Plaintiff states that in 2004 the 37th Parliament and many others
in NB
and NL were informed that he knew of Byron Prior and Charles Leblanc
and that
he supported their pursuit of justice byway of the social media. He
called
his fellow Maritimers after reading their words about politicians
and
listened to the reasons why they were collecting social assistance and
could
not afford computers. They did not care about his concerns with
politicians
but he believed them and offered his assistance by giving them
computers.
The Plaintiff asked that they publish the truth about his actions
and to
serve politicians copies of his documents. Leblanc publicly insulted
the
Plaintiff after receiving his computer and stole documents he promised
to
give to the Attorney General of NB and gave them to his activist
friends
instead. Leblanc was asked why behaved in such a fashion and he wrote
back
that he thought he was being funny and stated that he was not a sheriff
then
sent an email asking if the Plaintiff was a fair comparison to his dog.
That
email convinced the Plaintiff that Leblanc was a Conservative
insider
because he had apparently read a letter sent to the Attorney General.
It did
not take the Plaintiff long to figure out who his activist friends
were
because Leblanc had forwarded their email address along with pictures of
his
dog. Prior was difficult to deal with but he was true to his word. It was
he
who delivered the documents to the parties named in paragraph 53. In
2005
Prior was sued for libel within his website. The Plaintiff wrote his
defence
and counterclaim and it remained on the Internet until 2010. Prior’s
one
website had more visitors than all the blogs of Leblanc until late 2006
when
the New York Times reported that a judge found Leblanc not guilty in
a
criminal trial and considered him to be a legitimate journalist. As
the
readership of his blog soared, Leblanc and all politicians became
much
better friends. In 2007 the Irving media empire complained of the
Plaintiff
and Leblanc to Google and Yahoo. In response the Plaintiff’s blog,
two email
accounts and all his legal documents stored within Yahoo’s domain
were
deleted. Leblanc’s blog was deleted then restored. The FPF arrested
Leblanc
again in 2012. The Plaintiff reminded the Crown of a judgment of
Byron Prior
finding Section 301 of the Criminal Code unconstitutional and law
professors
came to Leblanc’s aid. The Plaintiff caused Leblanc’s “other
personality”
blog to be deleted not the FPF.
68. The Plaintiff
states that the Crown is well aware of three legal
actions against Byron
Prior. One action is a civil lawsuit for libel filed
in Supreme Court of NL
in January of 2005 against Byron Prior by a MP and
that a publication ban was
placed on the matter immediately. Two are
criminal prosecutions of Byron
Prior for libel. One prosecution under
section 301 of the Criminal Code was
found to be unconstitutional in 2008.
The Plaintiff was falsely imprisoned by
the RCMP in a mental ward of a
hospital after he spread the word that the
Crown had lost. The Plaintiff
does not know the judgment in the second trial
under section 300. He does
know that in 2009 Byron Prior filed some of the
Plaintiff’s documents in the
docket before he was imprisoned in a mental
hospital until early 2010.
69. The Plaintiff states that it was not
logical that Crown considered
Byron Prior’s actions on the legislative
properties in NL criminal. The
Crown was arresting and prosecuting him in NL
while the RCMP were issuing
him permits to do exactly the same thing in front
of the House of Commons
for months at a time from the spring of 2006 to at
least the spring 2011.
The Crown prosecutes and defends all criminal actions
at a provincial and
federal level. If the Crown was sincere in its
prosecution of Byron Prior it
should have arrested him on the grounds of the
House of Commons in the
spring of 2006. Instead the Crown had the RCMP and a
lawyer whom the
Plaintiff ran against in the election of the 38th Parliament
investigate
Byron Prior’s concerns at the request of his MP (Later appointed
a Senator)
and the Minister of Justice (Who his left seat in the 41st
Parliament
midterm as Minister of Public Safety and was appointed to be a
judge).
-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos
Sent:
Wednesday, May 31, 2017 10:43 AM
To: jan.jensen ; bill.pentney ; david.hansen
; mcu ; Liliana.Longo ;
hon.ralph.goodale ; bob.paulson ; oldmaison ; andre ;
gopublic ;
Whistleblower ; Dale.Morgan ; Gilles.Blinn ; Gilles.Moreau ;
Jonathan.Vance
; jkee ; DDrummond ; ht.lacroix ; sylvie.gadoury ;
hon.melanie.joly ;
jean-pierre.blais ; martine.turcotte
Cc: David Amos ;
political.financing@elections.ca
; Yves.Cote ;
mdcohen212@gmail.com
; washington field ; Boston.Mail
Subject: Yo Mr Jensen see attached file I
see that you corrupt FEDS are on
the attack bigtime as of May 24th N'esy
Pas?
For the record I only spoke with one Crown Counsel before I
appeared
before the Federal Court of Appeal on May 24th. This was the number
I
called and I talked to Liliana-Longo personally. She recalled our
last
conversation in April of 2003 and i reminded her that the documents
I
sent her in 2004 were now in the docket of the Federal Court. Need I
say
that I did not consider it a coincidence when two members of the
RCMP
attended the hearing in plain clothes on May 24th and refused to
identify
themselves?
http://www.goc411.ca/en/93105/Liliana-LongoLiliana
Longo works as Senior General Counsel for Justice Canada.
Liliana can be
reached at 613-843-4451
BTW I also managed to Speak to Trump's lawyer
Mikey Cohen on his Cell
Phone (646-853-0114) because that is apparently how
his boss wants to
do business these day. Seems that even the Yankee President
does not
trust his own FEDS N'esy Pas Yves Cote and Mr Prime Minister
Trudeau
"The Younger"???
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902
800 0369
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/05/re-federal-court-file-no-t-1557-15.html
I see that the RCMP's favourite sexually perverted shill on the Internet is enjoying the circus N'esy Pas?
There is a certain irony
in arguing her minions about suing the Queen after the long weekend we
are supposed to celebrate her position and be forced to pay homage to
the wealthy Brit N'esy Pas?
Bullying
and harassment remain serious problems within the RCMP, and only major
changes to the way the national police force is run will make a
difference, says a national watchdog.
In a report today, the Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for
the RCMP says the force lacks both the will and the capacity to address
the challenges that afflict its workplaces.
The commission urges the federal government to usher in civilian
governance or oversight for the paramilitary-style police force.
Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale ordered the commission report to
see if the RCMP had properly acted on commission recommendations made
in 2013. At the time, the watchdog said the Mounties must take swift and
effective action to reassure both members and the public.
The RCMP introduced new harassment policies and processes in 2014
aimed at promptly dealing with workplace conflict before it escalates.
The latest report, however, says the vast majority of complaints
under the new policies involve allegations that managers abused their
authority. These included accusations of abusive language, such as
“you’re dirt,” “people here don’t like you” and “nobody wants to work
with you.”
Others complained of being berated in public, punitive transfers or having leave arbitrarily denied.
“Organizational dysfunction in the RCMP has been well documented, and
the commission’s current investigation confirmed that the problems of
workplace bullying and harassment persist,” the report says.
The commission found that while senior leaders in the RCMP have made
efforts to prevent harassment –particularly at the divisional level —
these initiatives have been limited and ad hoc, and have not received
the necessary support from headquarters.
There has been no effort by national headquarters to monitor their
effectiveness, roll out best practices, or institutionalize reform
“There has been no effort by national headquarters to monitor their
effectiveness, roll out best practices, or institutionalize reform,” the
report says.
Incidents of harassment — sometimes extending over months or years —
can have serious professional consequences and can cause real emotional
and physical harm, the watchdog adds. In turn, this may affect the
operational effectiveness of the RCMP.
A key problem is that the RCMP’s definition of harassment is unduly
narrow, and likely results in valid complaints being dismissed, the
commission says. The policies are also overly complex and difficult to
comprehend.
In addition, they place “inappropriate emphasis” on the
responsibility of the complainant to confront his or her harasser, and
on the duty of supervisors and managers to report harassment, the report
says.
Unlike other policing organizations, the RCMP primarily appoints
uniformed members to senior administrative positions like human
resources and labour relations, rather than civilian experts, the report
notes.
The commission recommends hiring more civilian expertise within the
force. But it also calls for basic structural change, such as:
— a model that leaves administrative and financial matters to civilians, and operational issues to RCMP commanders;
— division of responsibility between a civilian commissioner and a uniformed chief of department, like the New York police; or
— a civilian board of management that would provide general direction to the RCMP and enhance public accountability.
“While RCMP senior leadership is not absolved of the responsibility
to make more sustained and meaningful efforts to address workplace
harassment going forward, lasting change will only come from fundamental
reforms to RCMP governance,” the report concludes.
RCMP Commissioner Bob Paulson, who plans to step down at the end of
next month, has grappled with the harassment issues plaguing the force
throughout his tenure.
Last October, Paulson delivered an abject apology to hundreds of
current and former female officers and employees who were subjected to
alleged incidents of bullying, discrimination and harassment dating back
as long as four decades.
He also announced the settlement of two class-action lawsuits
stemming from the harassment allegations that have cast a long shadow
over the police force.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Megan McPhee mbm@kimorr.ca
Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 23:26:01 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re Federal Court File No. T-1557-15 versus RCMP class action lawsuits etc.Well May 24th came and went and not a peep from any of youror your lawyers N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
I am out of the office today, and will have limited access to email in my absence. I will return your email upon my return to the office. Thank you.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Stephen.Thatcher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 19:23:55 -0400
Subject: Re: Re Federal Court File No. T-1557-15 versus RCMP class action lawsuits etc.Well May 24th came and went and not a peep from any of youror your lawyers N'esy Pas? (Away from the Office)
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
I will be away from the office May 22 to 28, 2017. For immediate assistance during business hours, please contact Kelly Barbe at 613-843-6120.
Thank you,
Stephen
*******************
Je serai absent du bureau du 22 au 28 mai 2017. Pour de l'assistance immédiate durant les heures de travail, veuillez svp communiquer avec Kelly Barbe 613-843-6120.
Merci,
Stephen
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Dalton, Craig (SD/DS)" Craig.Dalton@gnb.ca
Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 23:23:47 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re Federal Court File No. T-1557-15 versus RCMP class action lawsuits etc.Well May 24th came and went and not a peep from any of youror your lawyers N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
I have recently assumed new responsibilities and I am no longer serving as Deputy Minister of Social Development.
Please note that Eric Beaulieu assumes the role of Deputy Minister for the department. He can be reached at eric.beaulieu@gnb.ca .
Thank you
************************************************
J'ai récemment assumé de nouvelles responsabilités et je ne suis plus en fonction en tant que sous-ministre du Développement social.
Veuillez noter que Eric Beaulieu assumera les fonctions de sous-ministre à compter du 23 mai 2017. Il peut être rejoint à eric.beaulieu@gnb.ca .
Merci
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 19:23:38 -0400
Subject: Re Federal Court File No. T-1557-15 versus RCMP class action lawsuits etc.Well May 24th came and went and not a peep from any of youror your lawyers N'esy Pas?
To: Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, scott.bardsley@canada.ca, wsantos@callkleinlawyers.com, mbm@kimorr.ca, wjk@kimorr.ca, dklein@callkleinlawyers.com, Gunther.Schonfeldt@cpc-cpp.gc.ca, Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca, tomengel@engellaw.ca, Charles.Rusnell@cbc.ca, Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca, Charmaine.Bulger@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, pamela.roth@sunmedia.ca, dstaples@edmontonjournal.com, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, alison.crawford@cbc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com, CRAIG.DALTON@gnb.ca, Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca, Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Lesley.McCoy@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca, ian.mcphail@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca, stephen.thatcher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, info@pps-spp.ca, jean-pierre.blais@crtc.gc.ca, ht.lacroix@cbc.ca, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, cmunroe@glgmlaw.com, premier@gnb.ca, PREMIER@gov.ns.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca, Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 14:30:06 -0400
Subject: Re Federal Court File No. T-1557-15 versus RCMP class action
lawsuits about the cops harassing each other Why does the CROWN deny
that the cops have abused me as well?
To: Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, scott.bardsley@canada.ca, wsantos@callkleinlawyers.com, mbm@kimorr.ca, wjk@kimorr.ca, dklein@callkleinlawyers.com, Gunther.Schonfeldt@cpc-cpp.gc.ca,
Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca, tomengel@engellaw.ca, Charles.Rusnell@cbc.ca, Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca, Charmaine.Bulger@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, pamela.roth@sunmedia.ca, dstaples@edmontonjournal.com, steve.murphy@ctv.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, alison.crawford@cbc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com, CRAIG.DALTON@gnb.ca , Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca, Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Lesley.McCoy@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca, ian.mcphail@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca, Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, stephen.thatcher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, info@pps-spp.ca
Perhaps some lawyer other than Liliana Longo,
Dominic Leblanc or you should talk to me before I file a few more
lawsuits EH Minister Goodale and Tom Engel?
Liliana Longo
Senior General Counsel
Called to the bar: 1980 (QC)
Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Legal Services
73 Leikin Dr.
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2
Phone: 613-843-4433
Fax: 613-825-7489
http://www.avenueedmonton.com/November-2008/Is-This-the-Most-Hated-Lawyer-in-Town/
Is This the Most Hated Lawyer in Town?
Tom Engel has laid more complaints against police officers than any
other lawyer in the province. And police have made complaints against
him more than 20 times.
by Charles Rusnell
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/remand-centre-guard-sued-by-law-firm-over-drug-smuggling-allegation-1.3438934
Remand centre guard sued by law firm over drug-smuggling allegation
Lawsuit alleges guard told criminology students that lawyers were drug smugglers
By Charles Rusnell, Jennie Russell, CBC News Posted: Feb 08, 2016 12:53 PM MT
http://www.edmontonsun.com/2014/07/07/edmonton-layer-tom-engel-asks-for-pair-of-city-cops-to-be-fired
Edmonton lawyer Tom Engel asks for pair of city cops to be fired
First posted: Monday, July 07, 2014 04:33 PM MDT
Engel Law Office
200 Wentworth Bldg.
10209-97th St. N.W.
Edmonton, Alberta T5J 0L6
Phone: 780-448-3639
http://www.kimorr.ca/index.html#FL-RCMP
RCMP Class Action
January 17, 2017
On January 13, Justice McDonald of the Federal Court released reasons
certifying the action for settlement purposes. A copy of those reasons
can be read here. The Federal Court has scheduled the hearing of the
settlement approval motion for May 24, 2017 at 9:30 in Toronto. The
Notice of Certification and Settlement approval hearing is here. The
Notice in French is here. The opt out form is here.
On October 6, 2016, an historic settlement was reached in the systemic
harassment class actions brought against the Royal Canadian Mounted
Police by female RCMP employees. Under the proposed national
settlement, every single living current and former female regular
member, civilian member, and public service employee of the RCMP who
worked within the RCMP since 1974, and who experienced gender and/or
sexual orientation-based harassment and discrimination, will be
eligible to claim compensation, without fear of disclosing her
identity to the RCMP or of reprisals. The settlement is not effective
until approved by the Federal Court. Here is our press release from
today regarding this historic Settlement. To view the Federal Court
claim, click here.
To read more about this proposed Settlement, please go to
rcmpclassactionsettlement.ca.
On December 22, 2015, Justice Perell released reasons dismissing the
Crown’s motion to strike the statement of claim and confirming that
the pleading meets the s. 5(1)(a) cause of action criterion for
certification. To read a copy of the decision, please click here. The
balance of the certification motion, which was scheduled to be heard
May 26-27, 2016, has been adjourned.
Kim Orr Barristers is prosecuting a class action against the Attorney
General of Canada involving allegations of gender- and
sexual-orientation-based discrimination, bullying and harassment of
female Royal Canadian Mounted Police (the "RCMP") employees. The
action has been commenced in Ontario on behalf of all current or
former female regular members, civilian members and public service
employees of the RCMP in Canada, excluding persons resident in Quebec.
The claim alleges that men and women were, and are, treated
differently within the RCMP, and that female RCMP employees have been
subject to systemic discrimination, bullying and harassment on the
basis of their gender and/or sexual orientation. It also alleges that
the RCMP has failed to investigate, adjudicate and resolve conduct and
complaints about these issues, despite repeated reports over the years
about the problems within the organization.
The plaintiff is a former senior-level RCMP member who alleges that
she suffered discrimination, bullying and harassment throughout her
26-year RCMP career. The plaintiff alleges that as a result of this
treatment, she, as well as the other class members, suffered serious
injuries physical and emotional injuries, including post-traumatic
stress disorder, diminished self-worth, depression, and anxiety. The
claim also alleges that as a result of these systemic issues, female
RCMP employees have been denied training and promotions, and have even
taken early retirement or have left the organization.
The action seeks general, punitive and special damages for the
defendant's alleged failure to fulfill its statutory, common law and
contractual duties to provide female RCMP employees with a work
environment free of gender- and sexual-orientation-based
discrimination, bullying and harassment. The action also seeks damages
on behalf of family members of female RCMP employees who are entitled
to assert a claim under provincial legislation.
For more information on this case, please contact Megan B. McPhee at
mbm@kimorr.ca.
© 2017, Kim Orr Barristers P.C.
Suite 400, 19 Mercer Street Toronto, Ontario M5V 1H2 T 416.596.1414 F
416.598.0601
info@kimorr.ca Copyright Information & Disclaimer Privacy Policy
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/rcmp-men-allegations-law-suit-1.3821161
RCMP to face new class-action harassment lawsuit, this time on behalf
of male employees
Current and former members allege they were physically intimidated,
denied promotions, belittled and bullied
By Alison Crawford, CBC News Posted: Oct 25, 2016 8:35 PM ET
The RCMP will soon face another class-action harassment lawsuit — this
time on behalf of male Mounties and civilian employees of the force.
Earlier this month, the federal government and the RCMP set aside $100
million to settle an estimated 1,000 cases of female employees being
harassed and bullied at work.
CBC News has learned that one of the law firms that represented those
women is preparing to bring another suit for men — which could
potentially be much bigger given that men make up roughly 80 per cent
of the RCMP's workforce.
Mounties offer apology and $100M compensation for harassment,
abuse against female members
'This is a way for everybody to heal': ex-Mountie on RCMP compensation
External body needed to probe workplace complaints, senior Mountie says
"We've spoken with hundreds of members, and we're contacted by new
members every day," said lawyer Megan McPhee of Kim Orr Barristers in
Toronto, who has been working on the case for years. "The stories are
very consistent. We're told that there is a culture of bullying and
harassment within the force, and one of the regular issues that we
hear is a fear of speaking out, a fear of reprisals."
Cpl. Michael Mansoor, who's due to be medically discharged in January,
says he was diagnosed with PTSD after what he alleges was years of
harassment at the hands of his colleagues and superiors.
He says it started in 2001, when he was posted to his hometown of
Richmond, B.C., where his brother was in conflict with the law. It
wasn't long before Mansoor said he found his duties restricted.
"I was banned from any work section in the detachment except for
general duty and traffic because they acknowledged that there might be
a conflict," said Mansoor.
Wrongly accused of sexual assault
Despite pleas for a transfer, he says his superiors stuck to the local
convention that a member must serve five years in the detachment
before being moved.
Documents obtained under the Access to Information Act suggest
officers were suspicious of his family ties. Eventually, Mansoor found
himself suspended with pay and under investigation for what he alleges
are two trumped-up internal disciplinary charges.
Furthermore, due to a clerical error, Mansoor was also initially
accused of sexual assault.
"There was a minor glitch with [Mansoor's] security suspension
document service this morning," reads an internal email about
Mansoor's disciplinary charges. "There is a reference to a 'sexual
assault'.... It was our conclusion that HQ Ottawa had screwed up the
paperwork. Seems likely that they took a previous form letter,
re-tooled it for [Mansoor's] case and did not remove a phrase that did
not apply in this case."
As for the two other allegations, they later proved unfounded.
Whisper campaign
Over time, Mansoor says the ongoing whisper campaign and harassment
made him ill.
"There comes actually a point where you start to look at yourself and
go, 'Am I bringing this on myself? Because surely it's not this
widespread in an organization,'" Mansoor said.
Retired sergeant Hugo Desrochers says he knows exactly how that feels.
Retired Sgt. Hugo Desrochers
Retired sergeant Hugo Desrochers alleges that during his employment
with the RCMP he was stripped of responsibility, belittled in front of
colleagues and denied opportunities to develop his career. (Provided
by Desrochers)
He left the force last year after 26 years in a job he says, for the
most part, he loved. He was making his way up the ranks and working
towards another promotion, he says, but that came to a halt near the
end of his career when management changed at the RCMP detachment in
Cornwall, Ont.
"[I] started covering my back. Started taking notes to make sure I was
not going to be hung out to dry," Desrochers said.
Years of meticulous notes document allegations of being micromanaged,
stripped of his responsibilities, belittled in front of colleagues for
taking initiative and denied opportunities to further develop his
career.
The worst incident, according to Desrochers, was when the inspector
refused to sign off on his application to serve in Kosovo due to
shortcomings with his performance. Yet Desrochers says all his boss
managed to come up with, after repeated requests for specifics, was a
late overtime claim.
Retired Sgt. Hugo Desrochers
Desrochers, right, seen here on a marijuana bust in British Columbia
early in his career. (Provided by Desrochers)
"It takes a toll on you because you start questioning yourself...and
then you're not good," an emotional Desrochers told CBC News.
Desrochers welcomes the lawsuit.
"If nobody comes forward to say there's a problem, how are they going
to know there's a problem. Is it just me sitting here? No."
Belittled, physically intimidated
It's not just men in uniform who allege they've been harassed.
Garth Caron worked as a public servant from 2005 to 2015, doing
administrative work in detachments in Saskatchewan and Alberta. Caron
says his first experience with harassment was when a few Mounties took
issue with him being gay and subjected him to a number of pranks.
"I came in one morning to my workstation and I noticed a number of
female items on my desk — boxes of tampons and things like that — and
it kind of struck me as odd as to why they would have been left
there," he said.
At another detachment, Caron said a sergeant questioned his Métis
status, belittled him in front of colleagues and tried to physically
intimidate him. The union got involved and Caron says he agreed, while
under a great deal of duress, to retire before he was ready to leave
the workforce.
It's no secret the RCMP has a bullying problem. Commissioner Bob
Paulson has said so himself. In a 2012 interview with CBC News,
Paulson conceded that he too had been harassed at work.
"I think in the day, if you weren't sort of in line with your
officer's expectations or consistent with his or her vision of where
the organization was going, then you were pushed aside," he said. "And
it's a very uncomfortable feeling and a very destructive feeling, and
it doesn't speak to a transparent, ethical, organization."
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 12:46:00 -0400
Subject: A little Deja Vu for old pals of Kevin Vickers on the Hill to
review before their party hardy as Canada turns the corner on 150
tonight
To: heather.bradley@parl.gc.ca, Jean-Bruno.Tremblay@sen.parl.gc.ca,
Mike.McDonald@sen.parl.gc.ca, patrick.mcdonell@parl.gc.ca,
ppscommsspp@pps-spp.parl.gc.ca, Christopher.Nelligan@justice.ca,
Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, christian.bourgeois@parl.gc.ca,
denis.morin@parl.gc.ca, claude.st-germain@parl.gc.ca,
gilles.gervais@parl.gc.ca, geoff@geoffregan.ca,
Carol.Hughes@parl.gc.ca, bruce.stanton@parl.gc.ca, SpkrOff@parl.gc.ca,
geoff.regan@parl.gc.ca, geoff.regan.a1@parl.gc.ca,
john.wallace@sen.parl.gc.ca, rona.ambrose.A1@parl.gc.ca,
david.mcguinty@parl.gc.ca, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, garry.keller@parl.gc.ca, steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca, Peter.Edge@ice.dhs.gov,
postur@for.is, Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca, smari@immi.is,
cmunroe@glgmlaw.com, Matt.DeCourcey.c1@parl.gc.ca, DJT@trumporg.com, Alaina.Lockhart@parl.gc.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, pmilliken@cswan.com, mcohen@trumporg.com, dmcgahn@jonesday.com, oig@sec.gov, oig@ftc.gov, OIG@cap-police.senate.gov, James.Comey@ic.fbi.gov, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
They only time Vickers ever responded to me since 2004 was when his
computer acted ethically just Harper was preparing to ship him over to
Ireland a get him out of the way as he handed security over to the
RCMP.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: kevin.vickers@parl.gc.ca
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 17:43:20 -0500
Subject: Out of Office: Here is a little more Deja Vu for the CIBC,
the RCMP, the CBC etc and the lawyers/MLAs Jim Prentice QC PC Jonathan
Denis QC, Don.Scott QC and their newfound EX Wildrose pals
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Please be advised that the Sergeant-at-Arms is currently away from the
office and will be returning on Monday, November 17, 2014.
If this is a business enquiry, please contact:
Benoit Giroux, Acting Sergeant-at-Arms:
Telephone: 613-995-1990| E-mail:
Benoit.Giroux@parl.gc.ca
If this is a media enquiry, please contact:
Heather Bradley
Director of Communications, Office of the Speaker of the House of Commons
Telephone: 613-995-7882 | E-mail:
heather.bradley@parl.gc.ca
Please expect a delay in receiving a response to personal
correspondence due to current volume.
Thank you.
*****************************************************************************
Veuillez noter que le sergent d’armes est absent du bureau et sera de
retour le lundi 17 novembre 2014.
S’il s’agit d’une demande liée aux opérations, veuillez communiquer avec :
Benoit Giroux, sergent d'armes par intérim
Téléphone : 613-995-1990| Courriel :
Benoit.Giroux@parl.gc.ca mailto:Benoit.Giroux@parl.gc.ca
S’il s’agit d’une demande de renseignements des médias, veuillez
communiquer avec :
Heather Bradley
Directrice des communications, Bureau du Président de la Chambre des communes
Téléphone : 613-995-7882 | Courriel :
heather.bradley@parl.gc.ca
En ce qui a trait aux réponses à la correspondance personnelle, vous
devez vous attendre à un retard en raison du volume actuel.
Merci.
https://www.hilltimes.com/2015/02/06/biotechnology-20/30952
‘If Kevin Vickers were here, he would not let this happen’: May
The Hill Times
By Tim Naumetz
PUBLISHED : Friday, Feb. 6, 2015 1:19 AM
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/02/yo-cst-dale-drummond-do-you-or-any.html
Sunday, 19 February 2017
YO CST DALE DRUMMOND Do you or any the CROWN's lawyers recall the
document hereto attached (Paragraph19 in particular) ?
This is the text of the document
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/12/federal-court-file-no-t-1557-15.html
Sunday, 6 December 2015
Federal Court File No. T-1557-15 Opposition to Motion to Dismiss
Here is the proof of all that was filed
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 07:32:10 -0400
Subject: YO CST DALE DRUMMOND Do you or any the CROWN's lawyers recall
the document hereto attached (Paragraph19 in particular) ?
To: dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca,
Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, CRAIG.DALTON@gnb.ca, cmunroe@glgmlaw.com,
bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, brian.hodgson@assembly.ab.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, scott.bardsley@canada.ca, tim.turner@gov.ab.ca, Ezra@therebel.media, andre@jafaust.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca,
Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, postur@for.is,
briangallant10@gmail.com, premier@gnb.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, radical@radicalpress.com, akemp@andrewkemp.ca, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, jill.chisholm@justice.gc.ca, david.hansen@justice.gc.ca, bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 08:00:47 -0400
Subject: Re Federal Court File No. T-1557-15 and the QMPMA application
for a class action lawsuit against the RCMP byway of the CROWN
To: assoc.mpmq@gmail.com, fsimedia@videotron.ca,
charles.mancer@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, james@dugganavocats.ca,
Serge.Bilodeau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Paulette.Delaney-Smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Perhaps we should talk ASAP?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
https://ampmq.ca/class-action-harassment-suit-on-behalf-of-canadas-22000-rcmp-members-is-gaining-momentum/
https://mancer.rcmpclassaction.ca/application/
The Application for certification of a class action on behalf of all
members of the RCMP (past and present) arose from the many members
coming forward with their long-standing stories of harassment, abuse
and discrimination experienced while working in the RCMP. These are
stories that span many decades and point to a culture of bullying,
harassment and discrimination in the RCMP.
https://mancer.rcmpclassaction.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Application-for-Certification.pdf
https://ampmq.ca/en/
President Serge Bilodeau
Vice-President Charles Mancer
Quebec Mounted Police Members’ Association (QMPMA)
Post Office Box 154
Westmount, Quebec, Canada
H3Z 2T2
Phone: (450) 291-4458
assoc.mpmq@gmail.com
1699 Rue Principale,
Saint-Blaise-sur-Richelieu,
Quebec, J0J 1W0
Media relations
Frederic Serre
Media relations officer
Phone: (438) 875-4217
fsimedia@videotron.ca
http://www.dugganavocats.ca/home.php?lang=en#!contact
James Duggan:
Windsor Station
1100 Avenue des Canadiens-de-Montreal (West)
Suite 900
Montreal, QC, Canada, H3B 2S2
Phone: (514) 879-1459
Fax: (514) 879-5648
Email james@dugganavocats.ca
http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/06/re-rcmp-just-exactly-how-dumb-are.html
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Lisa Porteous lporteous@kleinlyons.com
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 14:46:22 +0000
Subject: RCMP
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
David,
Thank you for your email inquiring about our class action against the
RCMP. As you may know, the Notice of Claim was filed in the British
Columbia Supreme Court on March 27, 2012. The lawsuit has been
brought by former RCMP constable Janet Merlo on behalf of female RCMP
members. Unfortunately, we cannot assist you with your claim.
We recommend that you contact Mr. Barry Carter of Mair Jensen Blair
LLP to discuss any claim you may have against the RCMP for harassment.
His contact information is as follows:
Mr. Barry Carter
Mair Jensen Blair LLP
1380-885 W. Georgia Street
Vancouver, BC V6C 3E8
Phone: 604-682-6299
Fax 1-604-374-6992
This is not intended to be an opinion concerning the merits of your
case. In declining to represent you, we are not expressing an opinion
as to whether you should take further action in this matter.
You should be aware that there may be strict time limitations within
which you must act in order to protect your rights. Failure to begin
your lawsuit by filing an action within the required time may mean
that you could be barred forever from pursuing a claim. Therefore, you
should immediately contact another lawyer ( as indicated above) to
obtain legal advice/representation.
Thank you again for considering our firm.
Yours truly,
Lisa Porteous
Case Manager/Paralegal
lporteous@kleinlyons.com
www.kleinlyons.com
KLEIN ∙ LYONS
Suite 400-1385 West 8th Avenue
Vancouver BC V6H 3V9 Canada
Office 604.874.7171
Fax 604.874.7180
Direct 604.714.6533
This email is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client
privilege. It is intended only for the use of the person to whom it is
addressed. Any distribution, copying or other use by anyone else is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
telephone us immediately and destroy this e-mail.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:08:00 -0400
Subject: I repeat You never got back to me Mr Spratt WHY?
To: michael@agpllp.ca, bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, alison.crawford@cbc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
Jody.Wilson-Raybould.a1@parl.gc.ca
Michael Spratt
Criminal Defence Counsel
116 Lisgar St Ottawa, On K2P 0C2
613) 296-2561
michael@agpllp.ca
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/mandatory-minimum-sentences-justice-1.3976205
Liberals looking to eliminate many mandatory minimum sentences,
justice minister says
Wilson-Raybould says mandatory minimums contribute to backlogs in
Canada's courts
By Alison Crawford, CBC News Posted: Feb 11, 2017 5:00 AM ET
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 10:37:51 -0400
Subject: Fwd Even though the Premiers and Attorney Generals of ONT,
QC, MA, SK, PEI, NS, BC and AB refuse to answer the documents I sent
in 2005 and many wackos on the Internet deny that my lawsuit exists it
does not follow that I am a liar
To: postur@for.is, premier@gnb.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 10:36:19 -0400
Subject: Even though the Premiers and Attorney Generals of ONT, QC,
MA, SK, PEI, NS, BC and AB refuse to answer the documents I sent in
2005 and many wackos on the Internet deny that my lawsuit exists it
does not follow that I am a liar
To: ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca, premier@gov.ab.ca, suzanne.anton.mla@leg.bc.ca, premier@gov.bc.ca,
vicki.huntington.MLA@leg.bc.ca, mike.dejong.mla@leg.bc.ca,
bill.bennett.MLA@leg.bc.ca, themayor@calgary.ca, cps@calgarypolice.ca, don.iveson@edmonton.ca, eps@edmontonpolice.ca, radical@radicalpress.com, brian@brianruhe.ca, sunrayzulu@shaw.ca, patrick_doran1@hotmail.com,
andrew.weaver.mla@leg.bc.ca, adrian.dix.MLA@leg.bc.ca,
eliasishak@yandex.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, smcintyre@sylvanlake.ca, deanrogerray@hotmail.com, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, corporate.security@calgary.ca, don.marshall@edmonton.ca, Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca, paul@paulfromm.com, andre@jafaust.com, jbosnitch@gmail.com, David.Coon@gnb.ca, david@lutz.nb.ca, david.eidt@gnb.ca, info@greenparty.bc.ca, premier@gnb.ca, PREMIER@gov.ns.ca, premier@gov.pe.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 16:26:22 -0400
Subject: Perhaps you purportedly ethical Overseers of the Financial
Industry should ask yourselves a very simple question
To: ombuds@finra.org, Andrew.Bailey@fca.org.uk, dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, oig@sec.gov
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Where is the transcript and webcast?
http://www.banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/hearings?ID=90F8E691-9065-4F8C-A465-72722B47E7F2
U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs
534 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Phone: (202) 224-7391
Fax: (202) 224-5137
Mike Crapo Chairman
Washington Office
239 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Phone: (202) 224-6142
Fax: (202) 228-1375
Anyone recall the stuff this old blog of an NDP supporter?
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/david-amos-vs-bcs-liberal-premier.html
Have you seen the work Patrick Doran of Calgary in Encycopedia
Dramtica or YouTube?
https://encyclopediadramatica.se/David_Raymond_Amos
How about his buddy Barry Winters many very evil blogs
http://eateshite.blogspot.ca/2016/12/t-1557-15-and-swallowing-paste-with.html
How about some of the many computer responses to emails over the years?
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 11:41 AM, PREM Premier Premier@gov.ab.ca wrote:
Please be advised that the Premier's e-mail address is intended to
provide Albertans with a venue to share their comments on various
government issues. Therefore, it is requested that the Premier's e-mail
address be removed from your mailing list at the earliest opportunity.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Graff, Elisabeth JAG:EX" Elisabeth.Graff@gov.bc.ca
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 12:18:24 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: A little year old Deja Vu for Chucky
Leblancand all his old buddies in the Fake Left, the Greeen Meanies,
RCMP. the Fredericton and Miramichi Police Forces to review one year
later
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
I am away from the office until Tuesday, November 17, 2015. Please
contact Sarah Gibbs at 250 356-8835, Sacha Williamson at 250 356-8826,
or Carrol Parfitt at 250 356-8831 if you require any immediate
assistance.
Thank you,
Elisabeth
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David.Eby.MLA@leg.bc.ca
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 20:09:08 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE Justice Camp the Canadian Judicial
Council and Kathleen Ganley I just called Ganley's Ministry office and
her assistant hung up me Go Figure EH Ezzy Baby Levant and Premier
Notely?
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for contacting my Community Office.
This automated response is to assure you that your message has been
received by my office and will be reviewed as soon as possible, noting
that constituents of Vancouver-Point Grey have priority. Please be
sure to respond back and include your home address or postal code if
you haven't already, to confirm you are a resident of Vancouver-Point
Grey.
Due to the high volume of correspondence received, I am not be able to
respond personally to every inquiry. In most cases, anonymous, cc'd,
and forwarded items will not receive a response. Please do not
hesitate to contact my office should you have any questions regarding
the status of your query.
Should you have a situation that requires immediate attention, please
call Service BC, toll-free at 1-800-663-7867
and they will connect you to the appropriate government ministry.
To find out which MLA represents your neighbourhood, you can enter
your postal code here to get their contact information:
https://www.leg.bc.ca/learn-about-us/members
Thanks again for writing,
Community office of David Eby MLA, Vancouver-Point Grey
2909 West Broadway, Vancouver BC V6K 2G6
604-660-1297 | www.davidebymla.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jonathan Denis QC Jonathan.Denis@gov.ab.ca
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:35:30 +0000
Subject: Re: Well Mr Baconfat lets see if Patty Baby allows this
comment on your LIVE talk show stand the test of time EH PERVERTS?
To: Shawn Cullen shawncullen@telus.net
Cc: don.iveson@edmonton.ca, David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com, sunrayzulu@shaw.ca, patrick_doran1@hotmail.com, dale.johnson@edmontonpolice.ca, rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca, geoff.crowe@edmontonpolice.ca, greg.preston@edmontonpolice.ca, scott.mckeen@edmonton.ca, dave.loken@edmonton.ca,
danny.copp@fredericton.ca, lgunter@shaw.ca, Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com, martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca, Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca, eachtem@hotmail.com, deanr0032@hotmail.com, dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Rhansen@calgarypolice.ca, grcanning@gmail.com, scott.macrae@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,nbourdap@halifax.ca, pol7163@calgarypolice.ca,
bill.clark@edmontonpolice.ca, eps@edmontonpolice.ca, police@fredericton.ca, DDrummond@google.com, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Please also remove jonathan.denis@gov.ab.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Johnston, Jennifer JAG:EX" Jennifer.Johnston@gov.bc.ca
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 18:03:35 -0700
Subject: Out of Office: Christy Clark and Stockwell Day dig up old
blog comments about Indians to embarass Dix and Topp? Trust that that
statemnt was a minor the tip of a very malevolent Iceberg for BOTH
parities
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
I am away until April 23, 2013. I will not be checking my e-mails.
If this is urgent, please call Kathy Backer at 250 992-4262.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Premier PREMIER@gov.ns.ca
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 02:12:15 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: [PROBABLE-SPAM] RE The corrupt RCMP their
pal Senator Kenny, the evil Public Safety dudes and Old Email
Exchanges that even the CBC CLEARLY FORGOT
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
On behalf of Premier Stephen McNeil, thank you for your email.
Given the volume of emails and letters received a response, if
required, may take several business days.
If your email relates to a meeting request or an invitation to an
event, you will hear from the Premier's scheduling committee regarding
your request.
Premier McNeil appreciates you taking the time to write and values your input.
Warmest Regards,
Premier's Correspondence Unit
> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> From: Póstur FOR postur@for.is
> >> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:05:47 +0000
> >> Subject: Re: Hey Premier Gallant please inform the questionable
> >> parliamentarian Birigtta Jonsdottir that although NB is a small "Have
> >> Not" province at least we have twice the population of Iceland and
> >> that not all of us are as dumb as she and her Prime Minister pretends
> >> to be..
> >> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> >>
> >> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received
> >>
> >> Kveðja / Best regards
> >> Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
> >>
> >>
> >> This is the docket
> >>
> >>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
> >>
> >> These are digital recordings of the last two hearings
> >>
> >> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
> >>
> >> Jan 11th https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
> >>
> >> This me running for a seat in Parliament again while CBC denies it again
> >>
> >> Fundy Royal, New Brunswick Debate – Federal Elections 2015 - The Local
> >> Campaign, Rogers TV
> >>
> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cFOKT6TlSE
> >>
> >>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276
> >>
> >> Veritas Vincit
> >> David Raymond Amos
> >> 902 800 0369
> >>
> >>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
> dudes are way past too late
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
>
> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Thank you,
>
> Merci ,
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>
>
> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>
> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>
> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> campaign of 2006.
>
> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>
> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>
> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>
> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
> essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An
> ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear
> and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,”
> or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of
> terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states
> “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of
> Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an
> ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the
> Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
>
> One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty
> was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the
> amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time
> denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time
> self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of
> “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the
> G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious
> behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister
> Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully
> cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits
> are not.
>
> Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal
> mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the
> world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy”
> David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security
> and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can
> and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing
> “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war
> criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending
> tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
>
> In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
> “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
> successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing,
> marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian
> military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern
> equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are
> antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five
> years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that
> won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
>
> My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
> Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin
> Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not
> served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social
> democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and
> other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet
> these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to
> other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
>
> Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security,
> and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before
> shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
>
> Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now
>
> From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
> Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and
> the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still
> alive
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
> your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply
> to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
>
> >>>>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
> Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the
> War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
> To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil,
> Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, john.adams@cse-cst.gc.ca,
> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, stoffp1 ,
> dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca,
> milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca,
> sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir@althingi.is,
> smari@immi.is, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca
> susan@blueskystrategygroup.com, Don@blueskystrategygroup.com,
> eugene@blueskystrategygroup.com, americas@aljazeera.net
> Cc: Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca, "terry.seguin"
> terry.seguin@cbc.ca, acampbell@ctv.ca, whistleblower
> whistleblower@ctv.ca
>
> I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David
> Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's
> Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on
> CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To
> be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested
> that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise
> if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else
> about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact that your
> old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English
> never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is
> interesting though
>
> http://www.blueskystrategygroup.com/index.php/team/don-newman/
>
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/media/story/2010/05/04/al-jazeera-english-launch.html
>
> Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
> this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
> Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad
> Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
>
> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
>
> The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a
> shy political animal
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> Enjoy Mr Weston
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/news/story/2011/05/15/weston-iraq-invasion-wikileaks.html
>
> "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
> brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
> says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
> to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
> including a Canadian general.
>
> That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
> who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
> U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was
> also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
> prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
>
> http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2010/06/canada-and-united-states.html
>
> "I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
> being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
> demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
> "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
> into the US policy.
>
> At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
> in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
> report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was
> never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
> were deployed WMD.
>
> Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
> invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
> (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
> about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
> that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
> authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
>
> There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
> its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
> to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
> folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
> upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions
> are to met before US troop can redeploy? Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of
> Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them
> correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the
> George W Bush administration was onerous
>
> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
> military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
> operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
> ....not necessarily in that order. "
>
> You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
> Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
>
> http://www.socom.mil/SOCOMHome/Pages/ContactUSSOCOM.aspx
>
>
