David Raymond Amos Round 3: Real Deal Special (12 May 2022): Sky Dragon Slaying Program on TNT with Joe Olson and Matt Ehret

https://www.facebook.com/groups/2081235002003926/user/531776367

Matthew Ehret

Group posts

Intro

Admin of Rising Tide Foundation since June 27, 2019

Matthew Ehret shared a link.

In my last article in this history series, I attempted to shed some light on President Putin’s reasons for claiming the Bolshevik Revolution did significantly more harm than good to humanity over a century ago.

My primary intention in that location was to demonstrate that revolutionary the events of 1905 and again in 1917 had many characteristics of a foreign-directed regime change which disrupted a true revolutionary process then coming into being.

In this sequel I would like to delve more deeply into the 1867-1905 period of vast revolutionary potential that swept across the globe which the counter-revolution of 1905 and 1917 de-railed.

A Revolutionary Process Blossoms

The late 19th century was shaped, in large measure, by the growing U.S.-Russian alliance which saved the USA from dissolution during its Civil War. Masterful diplomacy at the time resulted in Czar Alexander II deploying the Russian navy to assist Lincoln in his efforts to preserve the Union with a direct message to both England and France that any direct effort to join the confederacy in war against Lincoln would be seen as casus belli by the Russians. This U.S.-Russian alliance again amplified its force in 1867 when Russian statesmen arranged the sale of Alaska to the republic with the aim of extending telegraph lines and rail through the Americas and across the Bering Strait by the end of that century. By 1890, pro-American networks in Russia had finally launched the construction of the Trans Siberian Railway which was to soon carry Baldwin locomotives produced in Philadelphia across a 9289 km expansive rugged terrain.

But despite the setback of murdered leaders Abraham Lincoln, James Garfield and Czar Alexander II, the momentum behind the growth of a multipolar international alliance of nations continued to grow. In 1890, Colorado Gov. William Gilpin’s designs for a cosmopolitan railway stretching across all nations of earth presented a beautiful vision of the world then coming into being.

risingtidefoundation.net

Mendeleyev, Witte and the Revival of Russia’s Lost Revolutionary Potential of 1905

By Matthew Ehret In my last article in this history series, I attempted to shed some light on President Putin’s reasons for claiming the Bolshevik Revolution did significantly more harm than good t…

2 Comments

David Raymond Amos

Hmmmm

https://www.bitchute.com/video/UOrI7xG5Gpuf/

BITCHUTE.COM

Real Deal Special (12 May 2022): Sky Dragon Slaying Program on TNT with Joe Olson and Matt Ehret

First published at 01:33 UTC on May 13th, 2022.

A completely fascinating preview of coming attractions, where Matt Ehret demonstrates an astounding mastery of history and politics, including the current situation we confront emanating from Ukraine and The Great Reset. I cannot emphasize enough how impressed I am with Matt. It was a great pleasure to host this special and I have invited him to be my guest on The Raw Deal tomorrow (13 May 2022).

Sky Dragon Slaying program on TNT Radio welcomes Matt Ehret, journalist, historian, Senior Fellow at American University in Moscow and founder of Canadian Patriot Review. Hosts are principles of Principia Scientific International, including John OSullivan, CEO, Joseph Postma, MS Astronomy and Joseph Olson, PE. We will be discussing the controlled history narrative and the Orwellian phrase, "He who controls the past controls the future."

There are two schools of thought on American history. One is that rote history is largely correct, past presidents were mostly, honest Patriots. The other is that the US is a captured vassal, debt slave state led by foreign directed puppets. Matt and I briefly discussed some of the characters in the Patriot-Puppet Paradox, on which we will elaborate during TNT Radio show. Steel sharpens steel, and we're both packing formidable steel.

Join us at https://tntradio.live/shows/sky-dragon-slaying/

David Raymond Amos

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2022/05/us-senator-canadas-freeloader-on.html

DAVIDRAYMONDAMOS3.BLOGSPOT.COM

U.S. Senator: Canada's a freeloader on defence and it's getting tiring

Matthew Ehret shared a link.

spetoAlgp0a902i5iuff500r4 l

I honestly don’t know if today’s USA is too far gone for its better constitutional foreign policy traditions to be revived, but I do know that if this history continues to remain buried as it has for the past several generations, then any small chance to save the republic and preserve world peace will certainly be destroyed.

The Strategic Significance of 1776 on International Affairs

Although many have been fed the myth that the USA was a nation bred for global imperial ambi…

risingtidefoundation.net

Too Late to Revive a Sane U.S. Foreign Policy? The Roots of the Monroe Doctrine Revisited

By Matthew Ehret I honestly don’t know if today’s USA is too far gone for its better constitutional foreign policy traditions to be revived, but I do know that if this history continues to remain b…

5 Comments

David Raymond Amos

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2021/04/russia-warns-nato-against-deploying.html

DAVIDRAYMONDAMOS3.BLOGSPOT.COM

Russia warns NATO against deploying troops to Ukraine

Jim Sechrest

Alexander Hamilton advocated for the first central bank of the United States. It was mostly owned by the central bankers of Europe.

In support of the notion that the purpose of the US Revolutionary War was to establish the independence of these central bankers and their control over the economies of the British colonies in America, free from the meddling influence of the King of England, are these facts:

It makes a lot more sense than the story we have been told, that a bunch of squirrel hunters were so mad about the taxes on imported goods that they rose up against their King.

Because, taxes went up (!) in America after the war, and Shay’s Rebellion against the taxes in the new nation was quashed by George Washington.

We are expected to believe that Washington was right to fight against the taxation by the King and also right to fight against the US citizens who rose up against the new government over the onerous taxes to pay for the war.

When Congress declined to extend the charter for the first central bank of the US, in 1811, the central bankers of Europe threatened the US with a costly war, and we got the War of 1812, in which the White House was burned to the ground.

Most Americans believe the rubbish that they are told about winning the war of 1812. The truth is that the war was ended upon the capitulation to the then Rothschild-led central bankers of Europe, and a second central bank of the US was soon created.

The central bankers were behind the creation of the US in the first place, which may be why they have never suffered due to having any respect for the Constitution of the United States.

One Rothschild stated that given control of a nation’s money, he did not care what the rules were.

The Rockefellers, Rothschilds, and J. P. Morgan (a Rothschild man) created the legislation for the Federal Reserve System and steered it through Congress. Woodrow Wilson signed it into law in 1913. The Rothschild man Paul Warburg became the first President of the Federal Reserve.

This was in order to create greater central control over the banking system in the US, in response to the economic crisis of 1907.

The Rothschilds also convinced Woodrow Wilson to enter US troops into WWI.

The end result of WWI and its aftermath was that most of the monarchs of Western Europe, the Tsar of Russia, and the leaders of the Ottoman Empire were ousted in the interests of the international bankers and industrialists, especially the Rothschilds and Rockefellers, who controlled the oil reserves of the Russian Empire since 1888.

They wanted to control the oil transportation routes from Baku, Azerbaijan through the Russian and Ottoman Empires.

They wanted to control the industrialization of the Russian Empire without the interference of the Tsar.

They wanted control of the oil refineries, railroads, steel plants, and banks in Russia, like they already did in the United States.

Jacob Schiff, the Rothschild banker in the United States, funded half of Japan’s war against the Tsar in 1904.

Schiff and the Rothschilds of Frankfort, Germany funded the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917.

Schiff said that if it had not been for his funding, there never would have been a Bolshevik Revolution. His grandson said that Schiff gave the Bolsheviks $20 million in 1917!

The Kaiser and the Tsar fought against each other in WWI. They were both ousted with Bolshevik revolts as the war ended.

US troops in Europe were sent by train to the far eastern part of Russia to keep Japan out of Russia.

US, British, and German bankers and industrialists invested in German steel and chemical industry after WWI. (The German industrialists Siemens and Krupp funded Adolf Hitler since 1919.)

Their hub corporation of German industry was called I. G. Farben. The executives of I. G. Farben directly advised Hitler, Göring, and Himmler, and supplied intelligence to the Wehrmacht.

The invasions of the Third Reich were the invasions of the international bankers and industrialists.

They wanted to stop the nationalization of their industry in Poland, end war reparations to France from their industry in Germany, and to oust Stalin from power in the Soviet Union (which they also financed, armed, and supplied with factory machinery).

US corporations, including Rockefeller corporations, plus General Electric, ITT telephone, and IBM helped I. G. Farben build and operate Auschwitz.

Prescott Bush and Averell Harriman used concentration camp labor from Auschwitz in their Consolidated Silesian Steel Corporation plant in Poland.

Bush and Harriman also lost their directorships at UBC bank in New York for Trading With The Enemy, in 1942.

The Rockefellers financed the Third Reich and supplied it with oil during WWII, through Vichy France.

The Bushes, Rockefellers, and Rothschilds funded and advised every single US President since WWII, including FDR.

Prescott Bush and Nelson Rockefeller ran the CIA when the CIA killed President Kennedy, according to eight CIA people who said that they knowingly or unknowingly helped kill Kennedy, including E. Howard Hunt and Frank Sturgis.

Those US Presidents that did not work out well for the interests of the international bankers and industrialists were ousted from office, one way or another.

E. Howard Hunt and Frank Sturgis of the CIA were both arrested for the Watergate break-in.

Ben Bradlee at the Washington Post was closely associated with the CIA man in charge of the CIA’s control over the news media (Operation Mockingbird) named Cord Meyer. Their wives were sisters.

E. Howard Hunt said that Cord Meyer had led the CIA team that organized the assassination of President Kennedy.

The Meyers and Bradlees had socialized with Senator Jack Kennedy and his wife Jackie, sometimes in the company of CIA counter intelligence chief James Angleton.

After divorcing Cord Meyer, his ex-wife, Mary Pinchot Meyer, had a two year long affair with President Kennedy. She said that “they” killed Kennedy because they could not control him anymore.

Mary was killed one year after Kennedy, as she said she was afraid that she would be killed for knowing too much. She was shot once in the back and once in the side of the head, while walking for exercise near her home in the Georgetown neighborhood of DC.

Mary used to take walks with Jackie Kennedy. Her brother-in-law, Ben Bradlee, of the Washington Post, identified her body.

Nixon was ousted in a CIA coup which included E. Howard Hunt, Frank Sturgis, and Ben Bradlee.

Trump was ousted in a CIA coup, as well.

The Rockefeller and Rothschild created-and-run Council on Foreign Relations controls US foreign policy (oil wars).

Joe Biden is a longtime member of the private Council on Foreign Relations.

The Rockefeller man Zbigniew Brzezinski was Obama’s adviser on oil wars in eight nations, including the US-supported coup in Ukraine in 2014.

Brzezinski said that the US wars were to control the flow of all of the oil in the world in order to control Russia and China, economically, for the central bankers.

The war in Ukraine is for all of the marbles.

The same big bank families behind WWI and WWII are also behind US wars in nine nations since they toppled the Soviet Union.

They fund and advise our Presidents and most members of Congress. They control US oil wars and the CIA. They run NATO. They run the intelligence agencies, the news media, and are even behind the production of Hollywood movies.

We live in their reality. They do not care about the Constitution of the United States.