SCOTT RITTER: ( MILITARY INTELLIGENCE EXPERT ON UKRAINE CONFLICT )
Scott Ritter ( Former U.S. Marine Corps. Intelligence Officer, and U.N. Weapons Inspector) , provides perspective on WAR IN UKRAINE.
Scott Ritter will address propganda, Nato Strategy, Russian progress, "no fly zone", and other key issues surrounding the conflict in Ukraine.
Join Freedom Reporters, Rick Walker and Brendan Kennedy for this in depth analysis and commentary on the war in Ukraine.
Fw: Avis d’enquête en vertu de l’article 32 modifié (corrigé) / Amended notice of intention to investigate under section 32 (corrected notice) - 5822-03179
Dana-lee Melfi<dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com> | Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 10:40 AM |
| To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | |
Another update on my recognised allegations on DOJ from OIC. Second amendment to the same complaint. Now we getting somewhere!
From: _Greffe-Registry <Greffe-Registry@oic-ci.gc.ca>
Sent: February 1, 2024 12:55 PM Subject: RE: Avis d’enquête en vertu de l’article 32 modifié (corrigé) / Amended notice of intention to investigate under section 32 (corrected notice) - 5822-03179 (english follows)
Avis d’enquête en vertu de l’article 32 modifié (corrigé)
Institution :
Ministère de la Justice Canada
Le Commissariat à l’information a corrigé les allégations figurant dans l’avis d’enquête en vertu de l’article 32 transmis le 15 septembre, 2022, qui sont maintenant les suivantes :
L’institution a pris une prorogation de délai invalide et l'a éventuellement retirée. L’allégation s’inscrit dans le cadre de l’alinéa 30(1)a).
L'institution a incorrectement placé la demande d'accès en attente. L’allégation s’inscrit dans le cadre de l’alinéa 30(1)f).
L'institution a communiqué par téléphone malgré la demande de communication par écrit. L’allégation s’inscrit dans le cadre de l’alinéa 30(1)f).
L’institution ne s’est pas acquittée de ses obligations en vertu du paragraphe 4(2.1), à savoir de faire tous les efforts raisonnables pour prêter toute l’assistance indiquée à la personne qui a fait la ou les demande(s) d’accès susmentionnée(s). L’allégation s’inscrit dans le cadre de l’alinéa 30(1)f).
L’institution n’a pas répondu à la demande ou aux demandes d’accès susmentionnée(s) dans le délai de 30 jours ou dans le délai prorogé, comme l’exige l’article 7. L’allégation s’inscrit dans le cadre de l’alinéa 30(1)a).
La Commissaire à l’information du Canada avise Ministère de la Justice Canada, en vertu de l’article 32 de la Loi, qu’elle a l’intention de faire enquête sur cette ou ces allégation(s). L’institution doit donc conserver tous les documents relatifs à celle(s)-ci jusqu’à ce que l’enquête et tout recours judiciaire subséquent soient terminés.
Amended notice of intention to investigate under section 32 (corrected notice)
Institution:
Department of Justice Canada
The Office of the Information Commissioner has corrected the allegations listed in the Notice of intention to investigate under section 32 issued on September 15, 2022. The allegation(s) are now as follows:
It took an invalid extension of time and eventually withdrew it. This allegation falls under paragraph 30(1)(a).
It improperly placed the access request on hold. This allegation falls under paragraph 30(1)(f).
It communicated by phone, despite requesting communication in writing. This allegation falls under paragraph 30(1)(f).
It did not meet its responsibilities under subsection 4(2.1) to make every reasonable effort to assist the requester with the above-noted access request(s). This allegation falls under paragraph 30(1)(f).
It did not respond to the above-noted access request(s) within the 30-day or extended period, as required by section 7. This allegation falls under paragraph 30(1)(a).
The Information Commissioner of Canada gives notice to Department of Justice Canada under section 32 that she intends to investigate this allegation(s). Consequently, the institution must keep all records relating to the allegation(s) until the investigation and any subsequent legal proceedings are complete.
From: _Greffe-Registry
(English follows)
Avis d’enquête en vertu de l’article 32 modifié (corrigé)
Institution : Ministère de la Justice Canada
Le Commissariat à l’information a corrigé les allégations figurant dans l’avis d’enquête en vertu de l’article 32 transmis le 15 septembre, 2022, qui sont maintenant les suivantes :
L’institution a pris une prorogation de délai invalide et l'a éventuellement retirée. L’allégation s’inscrit dans le cadre de l’alinéa 30(1)a).
L'institution a incorrectement placé la demande d'accès en attente. L’allégation s’inscrit dans le cadre de l’alinéa 30(1)f).
L'institution a communiqué par téléphone malgré la demande de communication par écrit. L’allégation s’inscrit dans le cadre de l’alinéa 30(1)f).
La Commissaire à l’information du Canada avise Ministère de la Justice Canada, en vertu de l’article 32 de la Loi, qu’elle a l’intention de faire enquête sur cette ou ces allégation(s). L’institution doit donc conserver tous les documents relatifs à celle(s)-ci jusqu’à ce que l’enquête et tout recours judiciaire subséquent soient terminés.
Amended notice of intention to investigate under section 32 (corrected notice)
Institution: Department of Justice Canada
The Office of the Information Commissioner has corrected the allegations listed in the Notice of intention to investigate under section 32 issued on September 15, 2022. The allegation(s) are now as follows:
It took an invalid extension of time and eventually withdrew it. This allegation falls under paragraph 30(1)(a).
It improperly placed the access request on hold. This allegation falls under paragraph 30(1)(f).
It communicated by phone, despite requesting communication in writing. This allegation falls under paragraph 30(1)(f).
The Information Commissioner of Canada gives notice to Department of Justice Canada under section 32 that she intends to investigate this allegation(s). Consequently, the institution must keep all records relating to the allegation(s) until the investigation and any subsequent legal proceedings are complete. ---------- Original message ---------- From: Leighton Grey <LGrey@gwsllp.ca> Date: Sun, 22 May 2022 17:53:32 +0000 Subject: Re: Methinks YOU and many FEDS FOR FREEDOM cannot deny that I crossed paths with their lawyer Leighton Grey QC just over a year ago N'esy Pas Higgy?? To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Mr. Amos: I have no connection whatsoever to Mark Jackson. Nor do I presently represent FFF. Regards, “Lex deficere non potest Justitia exhibenda” Leighton B. U. Grey, Q.C. Senior Counsel GWSLLP ______________________________ From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2022 11:48:54 AM To: Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>; premier <premier@ontario.ca>; Brenda.Lucki <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; Bill.Blair <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>; premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>; derekstorie85@gmail.com <derekstorie85@gmail.com>; cps <cps@calgarypolice.ca>; ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>; Kaycee.Madu <Kaycee.Madu@gov.ab.ca>; hugh.flemming <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>; Bill.Hogan <Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>; pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>; Katie.Telford <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>; Ian.Shugart <Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>; jcarpay <jcarpay@jccf.ca>; jagmeet.singh <jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>; robert.mckee <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>; andrea.anderson-mason <andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca> oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>; Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>; Leighton Grey <LGrey@gwsllp.ca>; contact@fedsforfreedom.ca <contact@fedsforfreedom.ca>; ian <ian@mccuaiglaw.ca>; mjackson@fieldlaw.com <mjackson@fieldlaw.com>; freedomreport.ca <freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>; chris.scott@ <chris.scott@ <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>; stefanos.karatopis <stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com> Subject: Methinks YOU and many FEDS FOR FREEDOM cannot deny that I crossed paths with their lawyer Leighton Grey QC just over a year ago N'esy Pas Higgy?? Hence anyone should undestand why I am laughing at them today EH? CEASE & DESIST SERVED TO CORE FEDERAL DEPARTMENTSWednesday, January 26, 2022 FEDS FOR FREEDOM FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE This notice is to inform the press and the public at large, that today the President, Secretary and Chief Human Resources Officer of the Treasury Board (the official employer of federal public servants) have been served with a Cease and Desist letter regarding the federal vaccination mandate for public servants. Today, January 26th 2022, the lawyers for Feds For Freedom, a not-for-profit advocacy organization for public servants, served The Honorable Mona Fortier, Peter Wallace, Christine Donughue along with all Departmental Ministers of the Core Public Service Administration under the Treasury Board Secretariat. These documents put the individuals served on notice that the federal vaccine mandates are unjustifiable, unconstitutional and criminal in nature. Feds For Freedom maintains that bodily autonomy and informed consent, free of coercion, intimidation or bullying are fundamental rights that are inviolable. The consequences laid out by legal counsel include, but are not limited to:
As federal public servants, we have had our livelihoods stripped from us; we have endured unprecedented amounts stress and hardships. We have been harassed, ridiculed, mocked and had hatred and violence incited against us. This type of abusive behavior cannot and will not be tolerated; we expect and request an expeditious response.
Grey Wowk Spencer LLP Page 8 . "Per
the attached Appendices, and for the reasons stated, there is no
rational or legal basis for making Covid vaccination a condition of
employment with the Government of Canada . This
violates Provincial, Federal, and International Human Rights statutes,
agreements, and conventions. This is therefore notice to the Government
of Canada that if it proceeds to act upon its threat to suspend without
pay, or terminate any of the named employees whom we represent for the
above noted reasons, the following action shall be taken without any
further notice: 1. Legal action shall be commenced against the Government of Canada ; 2. Multiple Human Rights Claims shall be filed alleging violation of ss.7 and 15 of the Charter and applicable Provincial Human Rights Legislation and 3.
An application shall be brought seeking injunctive relief and punitive
damages against the Government of Canada arising from irreparable damage
caused through violation of the fundamental human rights of the named
employees. We
expect that the Government of Canada shall govern itself accordingly.
In the meanwhile, we look forward to hearing from your corporate legal
counsel. Yours truly, GREY WOWK SPENCER LLP Per: Leighton B. U. Grey, Q.C. LBUG/mg"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Aqr9motb9I&ab_channel=BridgeCityNews
Federal Court rules Emergencies Act violated Charter Rights | Jeremiah Jost | GUEST17.4K subscribers1,654 views Jan 25, 2024
17 Comments
| |
Re: Announcement from Vincent Gircys.
info@nationalcitizensinquiry.ca<info@nationalcitizensinquiry.ca> | Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 6:52 PM | ||||||||||||
| To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | |||||||||||||
Thank you for reaching out to the National Citizens Inquiry. We are grateful for all your messages. Due to the volume of correspondence we are receiving, it may take time to respond. Thank you for your patience. You may find the answer you’re looking for on our website. Please visit https:// message concerns: Media Inquiries: Thank you! Please redirect your message to press@nationalcitizensinquiry. Commissioners’ Report: Thank you! Please visit https:// Volunteering: Thank you! Please sign up online if you haven’t already: https:// Other Inquiries: Thank you! We will respond as soon as we can. Help share the Commissioners’ Report! Learn more at https:// To stay updated on all things NCI, please sign-up for our e-newsletter: https:// Yours sincerely, NCI Support Team PS The National Citizens Inquiry relies on the gracious support of volunteers to help with our correspondence. If your question was not fully answered, or you have additional questions or concerns, please reach out to us again for assistance.
| |||||||||||||
Vincent Gircys is working with John Carpay and JCCF so of course they would play dumb while they settle with you
David Amos<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 9:00 AM |
| To: dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com | |
---------- Original message ---------- From: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 07:03:08 +0000 Subject: Fw: JCCF Portion of our current contract and This Retainer will not be changed unless both the Lawyer and I agree to the changes, and sign the new or altered Retainer. To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Hello David Wanted to share as I did like nor accept the hogwash that she tried to respond with. I held her to our contract and advised she should send the bill to JCCF. This is the 5th or 6th time documented she do so, and the first time "Sure, I can approach JCCF." she did? The answer came at 5:59 am this morning that JCCF was going to pay "the outstanding balance" and make a media release. I waited all day and none was made and still advertising my image with a donate button. The reason I was waiting is because she arbitrarily used my trust without me releasing it to her "if it was needed". Then I noticed your email was also sent to John Carpay. I have no worries because no matter what they will be paying the entire amount and not just the remainder. I do want to see how they handle this before this portion is shared. Will they admit the mental distress they have placed on me during this crucial trial I was headed to? Why did my lawyer not follow her contract in so many ways? I was constantly pressed to take deals. I could have used trust to travel and my stay for court and every donor would vouch they would be happy with that as I have the list she sent me and know everyone on it. No media release was made and no contact from JCCF. Monick says it is up to I to "take it up with her" meaning Eva Chipiuk. The problem for Monick is now that I do not give my number out at that time and could only be found in our secure contract that was shared with JCCF as Eva was still working for JCCF. If she would have called about my case I probably would or could not have an issue. That is not the case though and did document with an email and a call to Monick within 10 minutes. Please give it a day to see how they respond. Because it is cross border legal services with many contractual violations and ethics violations this is now a King's bench matter. I will be preparing a file for the complaints. I noticed that Vincent Gircys has decided to not read nor understand the importance of taking a few minutes to review. It is ok because my "Independent interim investigation and report" is almost ready. Dana-lee [cid:e0fabda6-500f-4943-8ff1- ______________________________ From: Monick Grenier <monick@grenierlaw.ca> Sent: January 31, 2024 5:59 AM To: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com> Subject: RE: JCCF Portion of our current contract and This Retainer will not be changed unless both the Lawyer and I agree to the changes, and sign the new or altered Retainer. You would need to take that up with her. All I know about that, I already told in in 2022 and that she's no longer with JCCF. I was only responding to your apparent allegations against me in response to my request to be paid the outstanding balance owing. As requested, i contacted JCCF with your bill and pointed out their fundraising. They agreed to pay the bill and will prepare a media release. Monick [pic]<https://www.grenierlaw. Monick L. Grenier Grenier Law 201-280 Metcalfe Street Ottawa, Ontario K2PIR7 T: 613-755-4037 / C: 613-552-5537 / F: 613-702-5557 www.grenierlaw.ca<https://www. <https://www.facebook.com/ <https://www.linkedin.com/in/ With offices conveniently located at Stave Law Chambers. www.stave.ca<https://www. [pic]<https://www.stave.ca/> Grenier Litigation Professional Corporation. This message is intended only for the named recipients and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. Dissemination or copying of this message and any attachments by anyone other than a named recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not a named recipient, please notify us immediately, and permanently destroy this message and any copies you may have. From: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2024 12:33 PM To: Monick Grenier <monick@grenierlaw.ca> Subject: Re: JCCF Portion of our current contract and This Retainer will not be changed unless both the Lawyer and I agree to the changes, and sign the new or altered Retainer. She had no right to use my information in our file to call and ask for her own personal agenda not related to my case. She called on behalf of Tamara and to ask to use my "proof" and release my documentation and videos explicitly only to "Help Tamara". You and they dismissed this with excuses that it "was harmless". It was not and I made sure to document it with you. She used private and protected information for personal gain. Period. JCCF was aware she did this and there were others in the room when she called me. ______________________________ From: Monick Grenier <monick@grenierlaw.ca<mailto:m Sent: January 30, 2024 11:27 AM To: 'Dana-lee Melfi' <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com< Subject: RE: JCCF Portion of our current contract and This Retainer will not be changed unless both the Lawyer and I agree to the changes, and sign the new or altered Retainer. Hi Dana-lee, Sure, I can approach JCCF. To reply to what you call, “our first breach of contract,” if you are suggesting that I breached solicitor client privilege, that remains inaccurate. First, the retainer agreement you signed authorized me to speak with JCCF about your file. Secondly, in July 2022 you wanted to hear from JCCF about a media interview. In fact, you agreed to talk to them about a media release. I confirmed in writing to you on July 28, 2022 that I accordingly provided them with your number. You spoke to JCCF and the result of that was the media release (in or about August 18, 2022). Eva worked for JCCF. I already explained this to you in my email to you on October 8, 2022. That is clearly the context in which she received your phone number. Monick [pic]<https://www.grenierlaw. Monick L. Grenier Grenier Law 201-280 Metcalfe Street Ottawa, Ontario K2PIR7 T: 613-755-4037 / C: 613-552-5537 / F: 613-702-5557 www.grenierlaw.ca<https://www. <https://www.facebook.com/ <https://www.linkedin.com/in/ With offices conveniently located at Stave Law Chambers. www.stave.ca<https://www. [pic]<https://www.stave.ca/> Grenier Litigation Professional Corporation. This message is intended only for the named recipients and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. Dissemination or copying of this message and any attachments by anyone other than a named recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not a named recipient, please notify us immediately, and permanently destroy this message and any copies you may have. From: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com< Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2024 11:31 AM To: Monick Grenier <monick@grenierlaw.ca<mailto:m Subject: Re: JCCF Portion of our current contract and This Retainer will not be changed unless both the Lawyer and I agree to the changes, and sign the new or altered Retainer. Hello Monick Thank you for your response. Please submit your bill to JCCF and wait for a response as directed. You say you do not understand much of what I say and discount specific communications. Eva took my private info from OUR file and contacted me in Oct 2022 on my personal cell phone # that was not available in any other way. I immediately contacted you. It was the FIRST breach of contract from you and JCCF. I have been straight forward and this implicates collusion into the illegal actions preformed by JCCF and the forementioned. We are in a global battle. You cannot hold accountability while standing in a lie. Internal faith is shown by external actions. Dana-lee Melfi Peace-Man ______________________________ From: Monick Grenier <monick@grenierlaw.ca<mailto:m Sent: January 30, 2024 10:06 AM To: 'Dana-lee Melfi' <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com< Subject: RE: JCCF Portion of our current contract and This Retainer will not be changed unless both the Lawyer and I agree to the changes, and sign the new or altered Retainer. Hi Dana-lee, Your email is very lengthy. I have replied, but I will not continue these communications. I cannot address JCCF’s position. I can confirm to you that I have never breached solicitor-client privilege and I have never disclosed any confidential information to Chris Barber, and in fact I’ve never spoken to him about you or your file, or JCCF and your file. You complained to me about harassment by him that was interfering with your fundraising efforts. You also previously approved the release of information to the public, that JCCF was funding your defence. I, in turn, told his lawyer to speak to him about this (that his behavior was interfering with your fundraising). I did not speak to him directly. While I am “on the record” as one of the counsel on his file, there is no relation between his case and yours (other than they both arise from the protest). You will recall however, that given your complaints about him, I told you that I am on the record for him, and I asked you if that was a conflict to you because if so, I cannot represent you both. Your answer to me was “I trust you,” and you did not find there was a conflict. The same issue was raised with him by his lawyer, about me, and no conflict was recognized. In any event, I did not speak to him about your file, and I did not speak to you about his file. His awareness of anything about you or your did not come from me – other than a text message I received from him where he asked if the charges were withdrawn, to which I replied only “yes,” which is a fact on the public record and not protected by solicitor client privilege. Therefore, these alleged “intimate details like them offering a new lawyer in writing to me” are not intimate at all, but were either gleaned from public knowledge and/or presumed by him through logical induction. It did not come from me. Below are some answers to some comments in your email. * I informed you of your professional standards even while asking me to pay an amount of $10,000. I’m not sure what you are referring to. I have fulfilled by obligations to you. * I informed you of my faith in you and trust you will do your job "to the best of your abilities" and told you I do not wish for another lawyer and give the courts any excuse to delay. And I continued to represent you, the result of which was the withdrawal of the charges. * I refused all "deals" and again informed you I would not plead guilty to any wrongdoing. And you did not take a deal and your charges were withdrawn. * I asked you to put in a late disclosure application. The charges were withdrawn. I told you that a late disclosure application was available, however, the charges were withdrawn. Consequently, there is no purpose or forum for a late disclosure application. * I asked to review any material you were going to share with the courts after you did not let me review the Charter Application. I did not file any further applications or other substantive material after the Charter Application was filed. You did review the Charter Application after it was filed, and you wanted me to add other sections which were not appropriate. I advised you of this. You did not want anything removed. * After shadowing up and ready on Jan 22 and making myself available for two hours before the 10"00 am scheduled time there was no Judge and no written explanation from the courts to me as to why. I asked for this. I questioned why my lawyer would not question this before first adjournment on that day. You did not tell me you wanted a “written explanation from the Court.. as to why” your matter did not proceed immediately. You did not tell me that you wanted to meet two hours before Court. The reason why the Court was not prepared to start was made clear on the record in your presence: there were other matters before your matter. That leaves no question unanswered. I told you this the week before the trial, as soon as I found out. * Again I was ready and no Judge and not questioned on record. The reason was clear and you understood that because you were in the Court. * A colleague of mine contacted you in advocation asking you to review something before returning to court. David Amos. I did review what he sent me, a series of letters to various agencies in Canada and the US (and possibly even the UK) advising him that his inquiries are not within their purview. They were entirely irrelevant. * He was met with dismissal. You never asked or contacted me to ask if this was in fact a colleague or friend. He did not tell me he was a “colleague or friend” but that he knew of your case and that if I presented what he sent me to the Crown they would immediately drop the case. When I looked at what he sent me, I saw nothing of relevance. He in fact ended the call very abruptly, not me. I have no obligation to tell you about random calls I receive from strangers. * This is quite important as you say that the Charter Application Challenge was a key factor in the decision. I’m not drawing the connection between this sentence and the ones above. Your charges were withdrawn. There is not a better outcome short of an acquittal which would have taken longer and cost more and was not a certain outcome. * There were other key factors. David contacted many people over several months and waited for responses. He never contacted me and did his entire investigation from my online presence and seen what I was on too for the security of Canada. In those communications you can find all here at this link below. Your charges have been withdrawn. There is no other obligation on my part. Perhaps he sent me the wrong file. What I recall seeing were old letters (predating 2022) from various officials advising that they could not address his inquiries. * There was no Judge because there were none that would take the seat after these communications is an avenue we are exploring with the courts through the transcripts and communications. The EMA being deemed illegal had zero baring on my case. We both know the courts seen how serious I was and did not want this case to be heard. I’m not following what you are saying here. There was a Judge, but there were matters before yours. What is on the transcripts is exactly what you heard in Court yourself. I think you are referring to the Emergencies Act decision. Yes, it had zero baring on your case, I agree. I disagree that the Court had any particular concern about your case proceeding. They knew if the Trial did not start that week, that I would recommend to you that we proceed with a Late Disclosure Application and a Jordan Application. I already told you this, and I explained the remedy for a success Jordan Application. You already told me you did not particularly want a Jordan Application but the Crown would not have known that – and it would have been the most reasonable next step and could have resulted in your charges being dismissed. At that point it becomes a waste of resources for the Crown to prosecute (as it was, in my opinion, before that point as well). * They know of the investigation I have been on. Despite me eluding to it many times to you, you have yet to question or try and understand the magnitude. I was retained to represent you against four criminal charges, all of which have been withdrawn. That was my only role. That retainer is now complete. I do not represent you for any other reason. I do not know the investigation you are on. I do know you have a dispute with JCCF and complaints about various people and you believe there is a larger agenda on the world scale, all of which had nothing do to with your defence, which is now complete. * On Jan 23 2024 I brought a witness to court from NCI. She also witnessed our communications outside the court room. I have no idea who you are referring to, and why or how this is relevant. * The representative that showed has never seen a case where a planned trial and no judge available. It happens often that the Courts are double booked, in my experience, in Ottawa criminal matters, even predating the pandemic. The Judge in Court was your assigned judge. * You are on the legal defence for Tamara and Chris Barber. We had to have many discussions about your client sabotaging my fundraising in more than one spot. None of them actually done by me but good Canadians that wanted to support me. You still allowed for it to happen and it hurt me. I told you, I do not wish you any harm. But you allowed harm and now asking me for payment. Tamara Lich is represented by Lawrence Greenspon and others. I do not represent Tamara Lich. I am on the record in an assistance role to counsel for Chris Barber. We discussed this. * After my case was withdrawn I spent two days finally disclosing my investigation to NCI with hundreds of documents and, video, and testimony on how the protest of 2022 was infiltrated and the public defrauded and deceived. You are free to do so. My only comment to you about what you say publicly now that the charges have been withdrawn, is that the Crown could in theory revive the charges if you now make admissions of criminal mischief or obstruct for example. I’ve already explained this to you, however, in other words, your actions could have been damaging to your defence in that a Judge could have found that you committed criminal mischief (had the videos been admitted), by finding that you intentionally barricaded the truck you were on or by telling others to block the road. Those actions do not fall within the scope of lawful, peaceful protest. * Plainly. On Feb 7th 2022 a Corporation was formed that placed demands on a five eyes country. If the Government would have even responded then a precedent would be set. Therefore the citizen led movement and their voices were stollen and premeditated. There were and are, far more than me working on this and there will be many more to testify in accordance to this. The money donated was always to be subverted and never to reach the intended recipients. and much more. The conspiracy charges will be investigated in a new way now. The Police have all the evidence that Freedom Corp and 53 other influencers and members of MSM in Canada were aware that lawyers for JCCF facilitated a media and propaganda control room for clients with court conditions and against those conditions. The Police notified and given evidence (Blonde) withheld this evidence even while under oath in his testimony before the courts. Has still yet to inform or share this evidence to date. This has no relevance to my representation of you. * Want to share that I am well aware that JCCF has paid a "private lawyer", yourself, just as recent as the date you want to abruptly end our contract with a quick finalization. As per your screenshot, you have asked Mr. Narvey this directly, and he has replied to you. I can advise you that they could not transfer all files to inhouse counsel due to scheduling conflicts and lawyer availability. * Page 1 of the 2024-01-27 MELFI ACCOUNT 1414 PDF is missing. (incomplete work) I see what you mean. There is nothing missing. It is a bug that occurs sometimes in my software. The first page of the account which says page 2 is the first page. You can tell that because it has my name at the top, and is addressed to you. Only the first page includes that information, which you can see if you look at any prior account I’ve sent you. I’ve attached the corrected version. * I wish to have a detailed full account of the payments for your services from the start of our retainer to todays date. I told you we will be sending the bill to JCCF first and if they refuse to pay then the next step is to pay it with the trust in place when I hold them accountable. I advised you that if it came down to it I would pay from my life insurance if I was allowed to withdraw and not affect my lawsuit (DANA-LEE vs GOVERNMENT OF SASKATCHEWAN). There was no disclaimer provided to me with your promise to pay me. You’ve already been provided with copies of previous accounts rendered, from my assistant by emails dated November 18, 2022 and January 4, 2023. I had not rendered a further account for work performed prior to the new arrangement offered by JCCF but I intend to. You should receive a copy of that account also (if and when it is rendered). * I ask you if you are the lawyer for Wayne Narvey? That is a matter on the public record as Mr. Narvey has chosen to share this information with his followers on social media with appreciation, for which I am very grateful. He has also communicated directly with you. * You have a retainer with him as a personal lawyer with JCCF as the payee correct? You have asked Mr. Narvey directly and he has replied to you. * His court is now complete. And JCCF has confirmed they would pay. I also have an admission from Wayne that this is the case. (pictures attached) I am not the person to address these comments. The retainer agreement also says, “If the Justice Centre does not pay the legal fees, I understand that I will be responsible to pay the legal fees.” This clause contemplates a situation like yours, and the remedy. If you want me to approach JCCF to see if this can be resolved, I suppose I could, although at this point, I’m not sure even that would satisfy you. * They have also paid much to others private lawyers. This raises some ethical questions on their actions and explanations to me. As above, I am not the person to address these comments. I have no idea what they have paid or spent private counsel nor on inhouse counsel for that matter. * Before I continue Monick I ask you to complete our business and contract with answering some questions, providing some services that have now arisen due to the oddness of the courts actions. To remain loyal to your client that has obeyed all Rights and Freedoms under the law. That has paid and treated you with respect. I am no longer your lawyer. Please do not take that as being blunt, or abrupt. It is simply a fact. Nevertheless, I have spent over an hour and a half replying to this email. * There are much more intelligent people than I that have been watching every social communication and7or Government submissions that I have initiated since the days before my stance. The questions and investigation that I have been involved with and "I stood in peace on these filed documents within the law at all times". Good for you. * No Judge within their ethics would ever try my case for a reason. They are not only aware of my strong defence, but also aware of the investigations I am involved with. This is highly implausible. * They were all notified long before my trial date. There are even responses from many acknowledging receipt. All 338 of the house of commons were notified and possible cabinet meetings associated. The Chief of defence notified and etc. Right up to our Prime Minister. * https://davidraymondamos3. You have posted this email publicly? Ok, well, that is your choice. You certainly cannot claim privacy for anything you post publicly. * I am staying in Ottawa to do some follow up and am able to have a meeting with you. I have nothing to discuss with you. I’ve been replying to your complaints for almost two hours now. I have bills to pay and obligations to meet. * I am available at your earliest convenience and need to get to a finalisation to submit my bill to JCCF. The trust is to be returned to an account until such time as I agree to release it. No, it does not work that way. * I must in the end advise the donors that the money they have sent was accounted for as I promised. It has. See account attached. When will you pay the remainder? * I want you to understand the seriousness and not discount it as "an issue between JCCF and I". I want a lot of things too. * It is also your issue in your new corporation. When we entered our agreement, you were a sole proprietorship. Is that supposed to be a threat of some sort? You retained me, I have always been your lawyer. Funds were donated to cover your legal fees. I represented you, and rendered an account. * I am giving you a chance to rectify the mistakes made and continue to honour our current retainer. I’ve replied to your email. If you there was a mistake make, I fail to see what it is, or what damages you have suffered. You agreed to pay me and most clients would be grateful for the outcome I obtained. Now that the account has been rendered you’ve suddenly come up with a multitude of reasons not to pay, and have even suggested I should not be paid at all. I see exactly what is going on here. I hope that helps clarify. I apologize for any typos, I’ve already spent too much time on this, and will send it without any further review. I do not intend to devote any further unnecessary time to your complaints subject to any invitation to act on my part expressed in this letter. I will resend you the prior accounts which you have previously received, as per your request. Monick [pic]<https://www.grenierlaw. Monick L. Grenier Grenier Law 201-280 Metcalfe Street Ottawa, Ontario K2PIR7 T: 613-755-4037 / C: 613-552-5537 / F: 613-702-5557 www.grenierlaw.ca<https://www. <https://www.facebook.com/ <https://www.linkedin.com/in/ With offices conveniently located at Stave Law Chambers. www.stave.ca<https://www. [pic]<https://www.stave.ca/> Grenier Litigation Professional Corporation. This message is intended only for the named recipients and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. Dissemination or copying of this message and any attachments by anyone other than a named recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not a named recipient, please notify us immediately, and permanently destroy this message and any copies you may have. From: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com< Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 11:00 PM To: Monick Grenier <monick@grenierlaw.ca<mailto:m Subject: JCCF Portion of our current contract and This Retainer will not be changed unless both the Lawyer and I agree to the changes, and sign the new or altered Retainer. Hello Monick I have unanswered questions about our current retainer. I have "demanded" nothing. I have asked you complete your work before "finalization" and with several unanswered questions as your client. I do not have time to finish the draft of all these questions and requests I guess, and is of no interest now as you now have indicated quite abruptly and rudely. Let me make this very clear my friend. This is nothing personal. I have not released JCCF of their commitment and have disputed that JCCF has honoured their part of our current retainer. The excuses that were given is "they could not afford to pay private lawyers" and they offered an "inhouse lawyer". No other reasons given. This was not the case though as it was a brand-new law firm with zero experience as such under the licence, they operate. This made me question the communications the day you notified me that JCCF wants to change their agreement. I immediately tried to contact JCCF through several means and they would not respond. You know who did respond to me with conformation that JCCF will no longer help me? Chris Barber in writing to me. How did he even know? He described intimate details like them offering a new lawyer in writing to me. This is when I emailed you back to question these things and was met by a "is already done" attitude. So I had the retainer reviewed by a lawyer friend I have and I was advised to proceed cautiously. So I did. I reminded you of the contract in place , and specifically pointed out, 9. I understand that my matter is confidential, and that no information will be released to the Justice Centre except as provided in this Retainer. 10. I understand that the Lawyer’s obligations are to me, if a dispute arises between me and the Justice Centre. 11. I understand and consent that this legal payment arrangement has been provided to the Justice Centre. 12. I understand and consent that the Lawyer will provide me and the Justice Centre with a copy of each account due on this matter and that the Justice Centre will pay the said account on my behalf as well as a copy of this Retainer 13. As a condition of the Justice Centre paying my legal fees for this matter: (a) I agree to assert my constitutional and other legal rights; (d) I consent to the Lawyer utilizing, in regard to this matter, the services of other lawyers, paralegals, IT personnel and the communication team who work with the Justice Centre, and I consent to the disclosure of information related to this matter to these persons to the extent deemed appropriate by the Lawyer; (f) I agree to fully cooperate with the media and communications strategies approved by the Lawyer and implemented by the Justice Centre to publicize my matter; 14. If the Justice Centre does not pay the legal fee4s, I understand that I will be responsible to pay the legal fees. 17. I hereby authorize the Lawyer to discuss all aspects of this matter with the Justice Centre’s officers, directors, employees and network of volunteer legal service providers for the purpose of advancing the matter. Such communications shall not constitute a waiver of solicitor-client or litigation privilege. 25. I understand that this Retainer represents the whole Retainer between me and the Lawyer in regards to the matter. This Retainer will not be changed unless both the Lawyer and I agree to the changes, and sign the new or altered Retainer. This Retainer may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one instrument. This Retainer may be executed by facsimile or PDF signature(s). 26. The laws of the Province of Ontario shall govern this Retainer. 27. I understand, the Lawyer is happy to answer any questions I may have. I may wish to have this retainer agreement reviewed by another lawyer. (Of which was done before I entered) I have already instructed you many times that our retainer is current and incomplete. When JCCF and John Carpay did not respond to my communications I secured a flight to Calgary and was going to walk in the front door of their head office. When they found out I was on the ground in Calgary I finally get a communication from their representative and he takes me for a lunch to explain. I did not let them out of the contract as they were still using my face several places online with a donate button even to this day 1/29/2024. POSTED ON: AUGUST 11, 2022 COVID-19-NEWS-RELEASESNEWS RELEASES Count Days 536 days of advertising August 11, 2022 - January 29, 2024 (Page 1 missing in finalization of billing that shows the total paid by JCCF) https://www.jccf.ca/peace-man- 536 * aprox $3033.22 = $5.68 per day. I know from admissions and testimony that many specifically donated for my cause at JCCF within the first 100 days. And even recently. I did however agree for a consultation from this new proposed lawyer and firm to show my cooperation with their offer. After the consultation they sent me a new retainer to review. I did and also had it reviewed. It was NOT in my best interest to enter or even entertain that retainer. I informed YOU of this. I was never going to respond to that lawyer or firm again. A week later he contacted me and said he was NOT a representative of JCCF, when just two emails before he said he was. He was unethical in a very pointed and out right lie. You are cc'ed in that email. I could not take this lawyer they "offered". WE did not agree and did not enter into a new retainer and ours explicitly states the one we have is still in effect to this day 01/29/2024 I informed you several times that the https://LSO.ca<https://lso.ca/ and https://lawsociety.mb.ca/ Had been contacted. Kings bench also contacted due to the seriousness beyond provincial borders on several lawyers under the banner of JCCF. I informed you of your professional standards even while asking me to pay an amount of $10,000. I informed you of my faith in you and trust you will do your job "to the best of your abilities" and told you I do not wish for another lawyer and give the courts any excuse to delay. I refused all "deals" and again informed you I would not plead guilty to any wrongdoing. I asked you to put in a late disclosure application. I asked to review any material you were going to share with the courts after you did not let me review the Charter Application. After shadowing up and ready on Jan 22 and making myself available for two hours before the 10"00 am scheduled time there was no Judge and no written explanation from the courts to me as to why. I asked for this. I questioned why my lawyer would not question this before first adjournment on that day. I waited until 2 pm and again no Judge and adjourned to Jan 23 10"00 am. Again I was ready and no Judge and not questioned on record. A colleague of mine contacted you in advocation asking you to review something before returning to court. David Amos. He was met with dismissal. You never asked or contacted me to ask if this was in fact a colleague or friend. This is quite important as you say that the Charter Application Challenge was a key factor in the decision. There were other key factors. David contacted many people over several months and waited for responses. He never contacted me and did his entire investigation from my online presence and seen what I was on too for the security of Canada. In those communications you can find all here at this link below. There was no Judge because there were none that would take the seat after these communications is an avenue we are exploring with the courts through the transcripts and communications. The EMA being deemed illegal had zero baring on my case. We both know the courts seen how serious I was and did not want this case to be heard. They know of the investigation I have been on. Despite me eluding to it many times to you, you have yet to question or try and understand the magnitude. On Jan 23 2024 I brought a witness to court from NCI. She also witnessed our communications outside the court room. What had NCI interested is they have representatives that have attended almost all cases regarding the protests and invocation of the Mandates and EMA in their own investigation. The representative that showed has never seen a case where a planned trial and no judge available. You are on the legal defence for Tamara and Chris Barber. We had to have many discussions about your client sabotaging my fundraising in more than one spot. None of them actually done by me but good Canadians that wanted to support me. You still allowed for it to happen and it hurt me. I told you, I do not wish you any harm. But you allowed harm and now asking me for payment. After my case was withdrawn I spent two days finally disclosing my investigation to NCI with hundreds of documents and, video, and testimony on how the protest of 2022 was infiltrated and the public defrauded and deceived. Plainly. On Feb 7th 2022 a Corporation was formed that placed demands on a five eyes country. If the Government would have even responded then a precedent would be set. Therefore the citizen led movement and their voices were stollen and premeditated. There were and are, far more than me working on this and there will be many more to testify in accordance to this. The money donated was always to be subverted and never to reach the intended recipients. and much more. The conspiracy charges will be investigated in a new way now. The Police have all the evidence that Freedom Corp and 53 other influencers and members of MSM in Canada were aware that lawyers for JCCF facilitated a media and propaganda control room for clients with court conditions and against those conditions. The Police notified and given evidence (Blonde) withheld this evidence even while under oath in his testimony before the courts. Has still yet to inform or share this evidence to date. Want to share that I am well aware that JCCF has paid a "private lawyer", yourself, just as recent as the date you want to abruptly end our contract with a quick finalization. Page 1 of the 2024-01-27 MELFI ACCOUNT 1414 PDF is missing. (incomplete work) I wish to have a detailed full account of the payments for your services from the start of our retainer to todays date. I told you we will be sending the bill to JCCF first and if they refuse to pay then the next step is to pay it with the trust in place when I hold them accountable. I advised you that if it came down to it I would pay from my life insurance if I was allowed to withdraw and not affect my lawsuit (DANA-LEE vs GOVERNMENT OF SASKATCHEWAN). I ask you if you are the lawyer for Wayne Narvey? You have a retainer with him as a personal lawyer with JCCF as the payee correct? His court is now complete. And JCCF has confirmed they would pay. I also have an admission from Wayne that this is the case. (pictures attached) They have also paid much to others private lawyers. This raises some ethical questions on their actions and explanations to me. Before I continue Monick I ask you to complete our business and contract with answering some questions, providing some services that have now arisen due to the oddness of the courts actions. To remain loyal to your client that has obeyed all Rights and Freedoms under the law. That has paid and treated you with respect. There are much more intelligent people than I that have been watching every social communication and7or Government submissions that I have initiated since the days before my stance. The questions and investigation that I have been involved with and "I stood in peace on these filed documents within the law at all times". No Judge within their ethics would ever try my case for a reason. They are not only aware of my strong defence, but also aware of the investigations I am involved with. They were all notified long before my trial date. There are even responses from many acknowledging receipt. All 338 of the house of commons were notified and possible cabinet meetings associated. The Chief of defence notified and etc. Right up to our Prime Minister. https://davidraymondamos3. I am staying in Ottawa to do some follow up and am able to have a meeting with you. A call would be insufficient and communications in email seem to be misunderstood. I am available at your earliest convenience and need to get to a finalisation to submit my bill to JCCF. The trust is to be returned to an account until such time as I agree to release it. I must in the end advise the donors that the money they have sent was accounted for as I promised. I want you to understand the seriousness and not discount it as "an issue between JCCF and I". It is also your issue in your new corporation. When we entered our agreement, you were a sole proprietorship. I am giving you a chance to rectify the mistakes made and continue to honour our current retainer. Thank you, Dana-lee Melfi | |
Fw: JCCF Portion of our current contract and This Retainer will not be changed unless both the Lawyer and I agree to the changes, and sign the new or altered Retainer.
Dana-lee Melfi<dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com> | Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 3:03 AM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hello David
Wanted to share as I did like nor accept the hogwash that she tried to respond with. I held her to our contract and advised she should send the bill to JCCF. This is the 5th or 6th time documented she do so, and the first time "Sure,
I can approach JCCF." she did?
The answer came at 5:59 am this morning that JCCF was going to pay "the outstanding balance" and make a media release.
I waited all day and none was made and still advertising my image with a donate button. The reason I was waiting is because she arbitrarily used my trust without me releasing it to her "if it was needed". Then I noticed your email was also sent to John Carpay. I have no worries because no matter what they will be paying the entire amount and not just the remainder. I do want to see how they handle this before this portion is shared. Will they admit the mental distress they have placed on me during this crucial trial I was headed to? Why did my lawyer not follow her contract in so many ways? I was constantly pressed to take deals. I could have used trust to travel and my stay for court and every donor would vouch they would be happy with that as I have the list she sent me and know everyone on it. No media release was made and no contact from JCCF. Monick says it is up to I to "take it up with her" meaning Eva Chipiuk. The problem for Monick is now that I do not give my number out at that time and could only be found in our secure contract that was shared with JCCF as Eva was still working for JCCF. If she would have called about my case I probably would or could not have an issue. That is not the case though and did document with an email and a call to Monick within 10 minutes. Please give it a day to see how they respond. Because it is cross border legal services with many contractual violations and ethics violations this is now a King's bench matter. I will be preparing a file for the complaints. I noticed that
Vincent
Gircys has
decided to not read nor understand the importance of taking a few
minutes to review. It is ok because my "Independent interim
investigation and report" is almost ready.
Dana-lee From: Monick Grenier <monick@grenierlaw.ca>
Sent: January 31, 2024 5:59 AM To: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com> Subject: RE: JCCF Portion of our current contract and This Retainer will not be changed unless both the Lawyer and I agree to the changes, and sign the new or altered Retainer. You would need to take that up with her. All I know about that, I already told in in 2022 and that she's no longer with JCCF.
I was only responding to your apparent allegations against me in response to my request to be paid the outstanding balance owing. As requested, i contacted JCCF with your bill and pointed out their fundraising. They agreed to pay the bill and will prepare a media release. Monick
Grenier Litigation Professional Corporation. This message is intended only for the named recipients and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. Dissemination or copying of this message and any attachments by anyone other than a named recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not a named recipient, please notify us immediately, and permanently destroy this message and any copies you may have.
From: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>
She had no
right to use my information in our file to call and ask for her own
personal agenda not related to my case. She called on behalf of Tamara
and to ask to use my "proof" and release my documentation
and videos explicitly only to "Help Tamara". You and they dismissed this
with excuses that it "was harmless". It was not and I made sure to
document it with you. From: Monick Grenier <monick@grenierlaw.ca>
Hi Dana-lee,
Sure, I can approach JCCF.
To reply to what you call, “our first breach of contract,” if you are suggesting that I breached solicitor client privilege, that remains inaccurate.
First, the retainer agreement you signed authorized me to speak with JCCF about your file. Secondly, in July 2022 you wanted to hear from JCCF about a media interview. In fact, you agreed to talk to them about a media release. I confirmed in writing to you on July 28, 2022 that I accordingly provided them with your number. You spoke to JCCF and the result of that was the media release (in or about August 18, 2022). Eva worked for JCCF. I already explained this to you in my email to you on October 8, 2022. That is clearly the context in which she received your phone number.
Monick
Grenier Litigation Professional Corporation. This message is intended only for the named recipients and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. Dissemination or copying of this message and any attachments by anyone other than a named recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not a named recipient, please notify us immediately, and permanently destroy this message and any copies you may have.
From: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>
Hello Monick From: Monick Grenier <monick@grenierlaw.ca>
Hi Dana-lee,
Your email is very lengthy. I have replied, but I will not continue these communications.
I cannot address JCCF’s position.
I can confirm to you that I have never breached solicitor-client privilege and I have never disclosed any confidential information to Chris Barber, and in fact I’ve never spoken to him about you or your file, or JCCF and your file.
You complained to me about harassment by him that was interfering with your fundraising efforts. You also previously approved the release of information to the public, that JCCF was funding your defence. I, in turn, told his lawyer to speak to him about this (that his behavior was interfering with your fundraising). I did not speak to him directly. While I am “on the record” as one of the counsel on his file, there is no relation between his case and yours (other than they both arise from the protest). You will recall however, that given your complaints about him, I told you that I am on the record for him, and I asked you if that was a conflict to you because if so, I cannot represent you both. Your answer to me was “I trust you,” and you did not find there was a conflict. The same issue was raised with him by his lawyer, about me, and no conflict was recognized. In any event, I did not speak to him about your file, and I did not speak to you about his file.
His awareness of anything about you or your did not come from me – other than a text message I received from him where he asked if the charges were withdrawn, to which I replied only “yes,” which is a fact on the public record and not protected by solicitor client privilege.
Therefore, these alleged “intimate details like them offering a new lawyer in writing to me” are not intimate at all, but were either gleaned from public knowledge and/or presumed by him through logical induction. It did not come from me.
Below are some answers to some comments in your email.
I’m not sure what you are referring to. I have fulfilled by obligations to you.
And I continued to represent you, the result of which was the withdrawal of the charges.
And you did not take a deal and your charges were withdrawn.
The charges were withdrawn. I told you that a late disclosure application was available, however, the charges were withdrawn. Consequently, there is no purpose or forum for a late disclosure application.
I did not file any further applications or other substantive material after the Charter Application was filed. You did review the Charter Application after it was filed, and you wanted me to add other sections which were not appropriate. I advised you of this. You did not want anything removed.
You did not tell me you wanted a “written explanation from the Court.. as to why” your matter did not proceed immediately. You did not tell me that you wanted to meet two hours before Court. The reason why the Court was not prepared to start was made clear on the record in your presence: there were other matters before your matter. That leaves no question unanswered. I told you this the week before the trial, as soon as I found out.
The reason was clear and you understood that because you were in the Court.
I did review what he sent me, a series of letters to various agencies in Canada and the US (and possibly even the UK) advising him that his inquiries are not within their purview. They were entirely irrelevant.
He did not tell me he was a “colleague or friend” but that he knew of your case and that if I presented what he sent me to the Crown they would immediately drop the case. When I looked at what he sent me, I saw nothing of relevance. He in fact ended the call very abruptly, not me. I have no obligation to tell you about random calls I receive from strangers.
I’m not drawing the connection between this sentence and the ones above. Your charges were withdrawn. There is not a better outcome short of an acquittal which would have taken longer and cost more and was not a certain outcome.
Your charges have been withdrawn. There is no other obligation on my part. Perhaps he sent me the wrong file. What I recall seeing were old letters (predating 2022) from various officials advising that they could not address his inquiries.
I’m not following what you are saying here. There was a Judge, but there were matters before yours. What is on the transcripts is exactly what you heard in Court yourself. I think you are referring to the Emergencies Act decision. Yes, it had zero baring on your case, I agree. I disagree that the Court had any particular concern about your case proceeding. They knew if the Trial did not start that week, that I would recommend to you that we proceed with a Late Disclosure Application and a Jordan Application. I already told you this, and I explained the remedy for a success Jordan Application. You already told me you did not particularly want a Jordan Application but the Crown would not have known that – and it would have been the most reasonable next step and could have resulted in your charges being dismissed. At that point it becomes a waste of resources for the Crown to prosecute (as it was, in my opinion, before that point as well).
I was retained to represent you against four criminal charges, all of which have been withdrawn. That was my only role. That retainer is now complete. I do not represent you for any other reason. I do not know the investigation you are on. I do know you have a dispute with JCCF and complaints about various people and you believe there is a larger agenda on the world scale, all of which had nothing do to with your defence, which is now complete.
I have no idea who you are referring to, and why or how this is relevant.
It happens often that the Courts are double booked, in my experience, in Ottawa criminal matters, even predating the pandemic. The Judge in Court was your assigned judge.
Tamara Lich is represented by Lawrence Greenspon and others. I do not represent Tamara Lich. I am on the record in an assistance role to counsel for Chris Barber. We discussed this.
You are free to do so. My only comment to you about what you say publicly now that the charges have been withdrawn, is that the Crown could in theory revive the charges if you now make admissions of criminal mischief or obstruct for example. I’ve already explained this to you, however, in other words, your actions could have been damaging to your defence in that a Judge could have found that you committed criminal mischief (had the videos been admitted), by finding that you intentionally barricaded the truck you were on or by telling others to block the road. Those actions do not fall within the scope of lawful, peaceful protest.
The money donated was always to be subverted and never to reach the intended recipients. and much more. The conspiracy charges will be investigated in a new way now. The Police have all the evidence that Freedom Corp and 53 other influencers and members of MSM in Canada were aware that lawyers for JCCF facilitated a media and propaganda control room for clients with court conditions and against those conditions. The Police notified and given evidence (Blonde) withheld this evidence even while under oath in his testimony before the courts. Has still yet to inform or share this evidence to date. This has no relevance to my representation of you.
As per your screenshot, you have asked Mr. Narvey this directly, and he has replied to you. I can advise you that they could not transfer all files to inhouse counsel due to scheduling conflicts and lawyer availability.
I see what you mean. There is nothing missing. It is a bug that occurs sometimes in my software. The first page of the account which says page 2 is the first page. You can tell that because it has my name at the top, and is addressed to you. Only the first page includes that information, which you can see if you look at any prior account I’ve sent you. I’ve attached the corrected version.
There was no disclaimer provided to me with your promise to pay me. You’ve already been provided with copies of previous accounts rendered, from my assistant by emails dated November 18, 2022 and January 4, 2023. I had not rendered a further account for work performed prior to the new arrangement offered by JCCF but I intend to. You should receive a copy of that account also (if and when it is rendered).
That is a matter on the public record as Mr. Narvey has chosen to share this information with his followers on social media with appreciation, for which I am very grateful. He has also communicated directly with you.
You have asked Mr. Narvey directly and he has replied to you.
I am not the person to address these comments. The retainer agreement also says, “If the Justice Centre does not pay the legal fees, I understand that I will be responsible to pay the legal fees.” This clause contemplates a situation like yours, and the remedy. If you want me to approach JCCF to see if this can be resolved, I suppose I could, although at this point, I’m not sure even that would satisfy you.
As above, I am not the person to address these comments. I have no idea what they have paid or spent private counsel nor on inhouse counsel for that matter.
I am no longer your lawyer. Please do not take that as being blunt, or abrupt. It is simply a fact. Nevertheless, I have spent over an hour and a half replying to this email.
Good for you.
This is highly implausible.
You have posted this email publicly? Ok, well, that is your choice. You certainly cannot claim privacy for anything you post publicly.
I have nothing to discuss with you. I’ve been replying to your complaints for almost two hours now. I have bills to pay and obligations to meet.
No, it does not work that way.
It has. See account attached. When will you pay the remainder?
I want a lot of things too.
Is that supposed to be a threat of some sort? You retained me, I have always been your lawyer. Funds were donated to cover your legal fees. I represented you, and rendered an account.
I’ve replied to your email. If you there was a mistake make, I fail to see what it is, or what damages you have suffered. You agreed to pay me and most clients would be grateful for the outcome I obtained. Now that the account has been rendered you’ve suddenly come up with a multitude of reasons not to pay, and have even suggested I should not be paid at all. I see exactly what is going on here.
I hope that helps clarify. I apologize for any typos, I’ve already spent too much time on this, and will send it without any further review. I do not intend to devote any further unnecessary time to your complaints subject to any invitation to act on my part expressed in this letter. I will resend you the prior accounts which you have previously received, as per your request.
Monick
Grenier Litigation Professional Corporation. This message is intended only for the named recipients and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. Dissemination or copying of this message and any attachments by anyone other than a named recipient is strictly prohibited. If you are not a named recipient, please notify us immediately, and permanently destroy this message and any copies you may have. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vincent G<vincent.gircys@gmail.com> | Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 6:25 PM |
| To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | |
| Cc: prontoman1@protonmail.com, waynenarvey@hotmail.com | |
Hello David, I
have no idea why you're sending me extensive emails relating to people
and situations I'm not involved with with no explanation or reference. I
currently have my hands full by working on matters that can make an
appreciable beneficial difference to Canadians in bringing about
accountability. I
suggest you try the appropriate social introduction to whomever your
trying to correspond with. Introduce yourself including the purpose of
contact and explain in short summary the concern you have and why your
contact might be interested including a request to delve in further
details. As someone who
gets extensive Web mail, I just can't process it all in short order. If I
tried I would be so far behind in workload I wouldn't be able to get
anything accomplished. I
hope you understand as this also applies to whoever else you may be
contacting of which some choose to proceed to use the block option. Respectfully Vincent Gircys On Tue, Jan 30, 2024, 11:01 AM David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- | |
Dana-lee Melfi<dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com> |  Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 12:00 AM | ||||||||||||||||||
| To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | |||||||||||||||||||
From: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>
Sent: January 29, 2024 9:59 PM To: Monick Grenier <monick@grenierlaw.ca> Subject: JCCF Portion of our current contract and This Retainer will not be changed unless both the Lawyer and I agree to the changes, and sign the new or altered Retainer. Hello Monick
I have unanswered questions about our current retainer. I have "demanded" nothing. I have asked you complete your work before "finalization" and with several unanswered questions as your client. I do not have time to finish the draft of all these questions and requests I guess, and is of no interest now as you now have indicated quite abruptly and rudely. Let me make this very clear my friend. This is nothing personal. I have not released JCCF of their commitment and have disputed that JCCF has honoured their part of our current retainer. The excuses that were given is "they could not afford to pay private lawyers" and they offered an "inhouse lawyer". No other reasons given. This was not the case though as it was a brand-new law firm with zero experience as such under the licence, they operate. This made me question the communications the day you notified me that JCCF wants to change their agreement. I immediately tried to contact JCCF through several means and they would not respond. You know who did respond to me with conformation that JCCF will no longer help me? Chris Barber in writing to me. How did he even know? He described intimate details like them offering a new lawyer in writing to me. This is when I emailed you back to question these things and was met by a "is already done" attitude.
So I had the retainer reviewed by a lawyer friend I have and I was advised to proceed cautiously. So I did.
I reminded you of the contract in place , and specifically pointed out,
9. I understand that my matter is confidential, and that no information will be released to the Justice Centre except as provided in this Retainer. 10. I understand that the Lawyer’s obligations are to me, if a dispute arises between me and the Justice Centre. 11. I understand and consent that this legal payment arrangement has been provided to the Justice Centre. 12. I understand and consent that the Lawyer will provide me and the Justice Centre with a copy of each account due on this matter and that the Justice Centre will pay the said account on my behalf as well as a copy of this Retainer 13. As a condition of the Justice Centre paying my legal fees for this matter: (a) I agree to assert my constitutional and other legal rights; (d) I consent to the Lawyer utilizing, in regard to this matter, the services of other lawyers, paralegals, IT personnel and the communication team who work with the Justice Centre, and I consent to the disclosure of information related to this matter to these persons to the extent deemed appropriate by the Lawyer; (f) I agree to fully cooperate with the media and communications strategies approved by the Lawyer and implemented by the Justice Centre to publicize my matter; 14. If the Justice Centre does not pay the legal fee4s, I understand that I will be responsible to pay the legal fees. 17. I hereby authorize the Lawyer to discuss all aspects of this matter with the Justice Centre’s officers, directors, employees and network of volunteer legal service providers for the purpose of advancing the matter. Such communications shall not constitute a waiver of solicitor-client or litigation privilege. 25. I understand that this Retainer represents the whole Retainer between me and the Lawyer in regards to the matter.
This Retainer will not be changed unless both the Lawyer and I agree to the changes, and sign the new or altered Retainer. This
Retainer may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which
shall be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one
instrument. This Retainer may be executed by facsimile or PDF
signature(s).
26.
The laws of the Province of Ontario shall govern this Retainer.
27.
I understand, the Lawyer is happy to answer any questions I may have.
I may wish to have this retainer agreement reviewed by another lawyer. (Of which was done before I entered)
I have already instructed you many times that our retainer is current and incomplete. When JCCF and John Carpay did not respond to my communications I secured a flight to Calgary and was going to walk in the front door of their head office. When they found out I was on the ground in Calgary I finally get a communication from their representative and he takes me for a lunch to explain. I did not let them out of the contract as they were still using my face several places online with a donate button even to this day 1/29/2024. COVID-19-NEWS-RELEASESNEWS RELEASES
Count Days
536
days of advertising
August 11, 2022 - January 29, 2024 (Page 1 missing in finalization of billing that shows the total
paid by JCCF)
https://www.jccf.ca/peace-man-
536 * aprox $3033.22 = $5.68 per day. I know from admissions and testimony that many specifically donated for my cause at JCCF within the first 100 days. And even recently. I did however agree for a consultation from this new proposed lawyer and firm to show my cooperation with their offer. After the consultation they sent me a new retainer to review. I did and also had it reviewed. It was NOT in my best interest to enter or even entertain that retainer. I informed YOU of this. I was never going to respond to that lawyer or firm again. A week later he contacted me and said he was NOT a representative of JCCF, when just two emails before he said he was. He was unethical in a very pointed and out right lie. You are cc'ed in that email. I could not take this lawyer they "offered".
WE
did not agree and did not enter into a new retainer and ours explicitly
states the one we have is still in effect to this day 01/29/2024
I informed you several times that the
https://LSO.ca and
https://lawsociety.mb.ca/ Had been contacted. Kings bench also
contacted due to the seriousness beyond provincial borders on several
lawyers under the banner of JCCF.
I informed you of your professional standards even while asking me to pay an amount of $10,000. I informed you of my faith in you and trust you will do your job "to the best of your abilities" and told you I do not wish for another lawyer and give the courts any excuse to delay. I refused all "deals" and again informed you I would not plead guilty to any wrongdoing. I asked you to put in a late disclosure application. I asked to review any material you were going to share with the courts after you did not let me review the Charter Application. After shadowing up and ready on Jan 22 and making myself available for two hours before the 10"00 am scheduled time there was no Judge and no written explanation from the courts to me as to why. I asked for this. I questioned why my lawyer would not question this before first adjournment on that day. I waited until 2 pm and again no Judge and adjourned to Jan 23 10"00 am. Again I was ready and no Judge and not questioned on record. A colleague of mine contacted you in advocation asking you to review something before returning to court. David Amos. He was met with dismissal. You never asked or contacted me to ask if this was in fact a colleague or friend. This is quite important as you say that the Charter Application Challenge was a key factor in the decision. There were other key factors. David contacted many people over several months and waited for responses. He never contacted me and did his entire investigation from my online presence and seen what I was on too for the security of Canada. In those communications you can find all here at this link below. There was no Judge because there were none that would take the seat after these communications is an avenue we are exploring with the courts through the transcripts and communications. The EMA being deemed illegal had zero baring on my case. We both know the courts seen how serious I was and did not want this case to be heard. They know of the investigation I have been on. Despite me eluding to it many times to you, you have yet to question or try and understand the magnitude. On Jan 23 2024 I brought a witness to court from NCI. She also witnessed our communications outside the court room. What had NCI interested is they have representatives that have attended almost all cases regarding the protests and invocation of the Mandates and EMA in their own investigation. The representative that showed has never seen a case where a planned trial and no judge available. You are on the legal defence for Tamara and Chris Barber. We had to have many discussions about your client sabotaging my fundraising in more than one spot. None of them actually done by me but good Canadians that wanted to support me. You still allowed for it to happen and it hurt me. I told you, I do not wish you any harm. But you allowed harm and now asking me for payment. After my case was withdrawn I spent two days finally disclosing my investigation to NCI with hundreds of documents and, video, and testimony on how the protest of 2022 was infiltrated and the public defrauded and deceived. Plainly. On Feb 7th 2022
a Corporation was formed that placed demands on a five eyes country. If
the Government would have
even responded then a precedent would be set. Therefore the citizen led
movement and their voices were stollen and premeditated. There were and
are, far more than me working on this and there will be many more to
testify in accordance to this.
The money donated was always to be subverted and never to reach the intended recipients. and much more. The conspiracy charges will be investigated in a new way now. The Police have all the evidence that Freedom Corp and 53 other influencers and members of MSM in Canada were aware that lawyers for JCCF facilitated a media and propaganda control room for clients with court conditions and against those conditions. The Police notified and given evidence (Blonde) withheld this evidence even while under oath in his testimony before the courts. Has still yet to inform or share this evidence to date. Want to share that I am well aware that JCCF has paid a "private lawyer", yourself, just as recent as the date you want to abruptly end our contract with a quick finalization. Page 1 of the 2024-01-27 MELFI ACCOUNT 1414 PDF is missing. (incomplete work) I wish to have a detailed full account of the payments for your services from the start of our retainer to todays date. I told you we will be sending the bill to JCCF first and if they refuse to pay then the next step is to pay it with the trust in place when I hold them accountable. I advised you that if it came down to it I would pay from my life insurance if I was allowed to withdraw and not affect my lawsuit (DANA-LEE vs GOVERNMENT OF SASKATCHEWAN). I ask you if you are the lawyer for Wayne Narvey? You have a retainer with him as a personal lawyer with JCCF as the payee correct? His court is now complete. And JCCF has confirmed they would pay. I also have an admission from Wayne that this is the case. (pictures attached) They have also paid much to others private lawyers. This raises some ethical questions on their actions and explanations to me. Before I continue Monick I ask you to complete our business and contract with answering some questions, providing some services that have now arisen due to the oddness of the courts actions. To remain loyal to your client that has obeyed all Rights and Freedoms under the law. That has paid and treated you with respect. There are much more intelligent people than I that have been watching every social communication and7or Government submissions that I have initiated since the days before my stance. The questions and investigation that I have been involved with and "I stood in peace on these filed documents within the law at all times". No Judge within their ethics would ever try my case for a reason. They are not only aware of my strong defence, but also aware of the investigations I am involved with. They were all notified long before my trial date. There are even responses from many acknowledging receipt. All 338 of the house of commons were notified and possible cabinet meetings associated. The Chief of defence notified and etc. Right up to our Prime Minister. https://davidraymondamos3.
I am staying in Ottawa to do some follow up and am able to have a meeting with you. A call would be insufficient and communications in email seem to be misunderstood.
I am available at your earliest convenience and need to get to a
finalisation to submit my bill to JCCF. The trust is to be returned to
an account until such time as I agree to release it.
I must in the end advise the donors that the money they have sent was accounted for as I promised. I want you to understand the seriousness and not discount it as "an issue between JCCF and I". It is also your issue in your new corporation. When we entered our agreement, you were a sole proprietorship. I am giving you a chance to rectify the mistakes made and continue to honour our current retainer. Thank you,
Dana-lee Melfi
| |||||||||||||||||||
RE The "Peace-Man" returns to court in Ottawa on Monday Correct?
Dana-lee Melfi<dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com> | Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 7:02 PM |
| To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | |
Peace-Man returns to Ottawa for a trial
213 subscribers
2 Comments
David Amos<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 1:07 PM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| To: Dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com, monick@grenierlaw.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, ps.ministerofpublicsafety-ministredelasecuritepublique.sp@ps-sp.gc.ca, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.fin" <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino" <Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, "Nathalie.G.Drouin" <Nathalie.G.Drouin@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, "Michael.Duheme" <Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca> | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Now that "Peace-Man" is before the court he may enjoy checking some of my work about war etc YO Minister Marco Mendicino Methinks its High Time that you and I create a MOU N'esy Pas Ian Nunn???
https://twitter.com/ David Raymond Amos’s Tweets · Apr 6 David Raymond Amos @DavidRaymondAm1 Replying to @DavidRaymondAm1 @DanDonovan4 and 42 others YO @realGonzaloLira Go Figure why the link I offered you within @YouTube was blocked https://davidraymondamos3. #UkraineRussianWar #cdnpoli 366 Comments David Amos Say Hoka Hey to NATO or me https://youtube.com/watch?v= youtube.com Vanished: Is There a NATO General In Mariupol? A good introduction to the entire Skripal affair, and the unanswered questions: http://johnhelmer.net/four- David Raymond Amos @DavidRaymondAm1 Replying to @DavidRaymondAm1 @DanDonovan4 and 44 others I heard through the grapevine that you ain't dead yet but have been muzzled bigtime #UkraineRussianWar #cdnpoli Too bad so sad that these dudes were not honest with mean old me just you dudes never were EH? @ikwilson @wikileaks @guardian @ggreenwald https://www.youtube.com/watch? youtube.com FOOD PLANT FIRES: LIVE NEWS COVERAGE...THE CONSPIRACY...THE SHORTAGES Freedom Reporter and researcher Ian Nunn joins the conversation with the newest data surrounding a bizarre chain of Food Processing Plant fires across the U.... Mar 26 Gonzalo Lira @realGonzaloLira You want to learn the truth about the Zelensky regime? Google these names: Vlodymyr Struk Denis Kireev Mikhail & Aleksander Kononovich Nestor Shufrych Yan Taksyur Dmitri Djangirov Elena Berezhnaya If you haven’t heard from me in 12 hours or more, put my name on this list. GL David Raymond Amos @DavidRaymondAm1 Replying to @realGonzaloLira This was the last I heard from you https://www.youtube.com/watch? youtube.com Scott Ritter and The Battle of the Donbas My Telegram channel: https://t.me/realCRPMy Twitter: https://twitter.com/ content: https://www.patreon.com/Co.. https://davidraymondamos3. Monday, 26 April 2021 YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON STALKER, all the NATO dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam https://www.youtube.com/watch? Ready for nuclear holocaust with Russia over Ukraine? 100,941 views •Apr 16, 2021 5.2K160Share Save Tulsi Gabbard Are we prepared to see our loved ones burn alive in a nuclear holocaust in a war with Russia over Ukraine? If not, cut out the macho saber rattling and deescalate before it's too late. 2,080 Comments David Amos David Amos Why did you ignore me when you were running for Presidential Office??? https://davidraymondamos3. https://twitter.com/ David Raymond Amos @DavidRaymondAm1 Replying to @JonathanVize We just talked about this video that you dudes published Please say Hey to @HarjitSajjan and the Boyz for me will ya? https://www.youtube.com/watch? Canada on alert as Russia military moves into Arctic 846,650 views Apr 7, 2021 Inside The Story The Russian military has built a network of bases and stations along its northern coast in recent years, while developing new weapons that could hit North America. 3,852 Comments David Amos David Amos Hmmmm | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The "Peace-Man" returns to court in Ottawa on Monday Correct?
Chrystia Freeland<Chrystia.Freeland@fin.gc.ca> | Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 6:20 PM | |
| To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | ||
The
Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments. | ||
Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada<mcu@justice.gc.ca> | Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 6:20 PM |
| To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | |
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Arif Virani, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be carefully reviewed. We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language. ------------------- Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable Arif Virani, ministre de la Justice et procureur général du Canada.
Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant. | |
David Amos<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 6:18 PM |
| To: Dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com, monick@grenierlaw.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, ps.ministerofpublicsafety-ministredelasecuritepublique.sp@ps-sp.gc.ca | |
| Cc: mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.fin" <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino" <Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, "Nathalie.G.Drouin" <Nathalie.G.Drouin@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, "Michael.Duheme" <Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca> | |
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Minister of Public Safety / Ministre de la Sécurité publique
(PS/SP)" <ps.ministerofpublicsafety-
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 16:17:02 +0000
Subject: Response from Public Safety Canada - LEB-001083 / Réponse de
Sécurité Publique Canada - LEB-001083
To: "david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Unclassified | Non classifié
Dear David Amos,
This is in response to your correspondence dated July 24, 2019,
addressed to the Right Honourable Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of
Canada, concerning the New Brunswick Police Commission.
We regret to inform you that after examining your correspondence, it
has been determined that the subject matter which you raise does not
fall under the purview of our department and portfolio agencies. This
can be brought to the attention of the Saint John, New Brunswick
Police Commission.
Consequently, no response will be provided.
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Ministerial Correspondence Unit
Public Safety Canada
Unclassified | Non classifié
Saturday 20 January 2024
Peace-Man returns to Ottawa
Take A Stand
Welcome
There's much to see here. It has just begun!
If you have video, Pictures or links of Peace-Man for a near future project
please send via Dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com
Or click the chat button at bottom of page!
Black and white pictures done by
It is our duty
Do not let the Main media & Government fool you!
This action was not mere seconds for a photo op, please remember this.
This was not meant for one person, but humanity as a whole.
With clear intention if you could follow the story. I know they made it so difficult for people to focus on the end goal.
Major strides are happening to expose and restore humanity starting in our country.
There is much information out there and it is "the bits" of truth that are hard to follow. As we move forward on this story about Peace-Man you can also see the entire path on social media, MSM and and many other platforms.
Everything Peace-Man has done has been with careful consideration.
Named not by himself, by "the people".
Almost all went to Ottawa in personal protest because of what we were enduring as a country.
We know that not just "Ze Cabinets are penetrated".
We know courts will not solve it or at least be years delayed as is the plan.
What would be the first thing they would protect as to not ruin the massive changes in so many countries? Citizen led movements. Period.
Every trick in the book is being played on many.
After years of personal experience with many of you as a mere citizen, your hearts are in the right place.
Do your research is being hailed, and so many have failed.
As citizens looking for concrete actionable, peaceful solutions. WE have just passed the first stage. (2023)
If you want to have civil intelligent conversation before some of these comments I see, Stop, Take a look back
at the many involved. You will find the inconsistencies, connections,
symbolism, contradictions and much more if you think unbiased.
It comes down to root causes to expose all of the truth.
There are investigators for the good I believe now, They have had no choice but to open this conversation.
So, my personal belief is that as
citizens united no matter if avocate or whatever you call yourselves
that do not fight for Rights and freedoms, one thing in common is,
"We
as citizens need to call for a direct investigation to the very public
announcement that our Government and businesses are "Penetrated"".
We
can keep breaking branches of this tree all day exposing individuals,
corporations, gov entities, courts and so on. Wasting money and
resources fighting nothing... or.... all work together and really get to
some truth.
This way nobody is fighting in the streets, it can be accepted as a petition in gov.
Bingo bango bongo!
Why is there zero investigations in countries about this?
At this time. NOBODY should fear investigation.
Just my view, Thank you V4F
Peace-Man
Standing by the written and spoken word is exactly not what is happening in this world, in this moment. When things are not dealt with as they are happening according to our many laws, Rights, freedoms, and moral accountability the perpetrators delay and get away with it, creating a public perception in the moment.
After that moment is done, usually the damage is done.
But sometimes, they become teaching moments on a broad scale.
25 days standing only in Peace.
Thousands supporting Peace-Man face to face and millions online from around the world.
Zero government officials asking to hear Canadians grievances and ignoring many requests to be heard.
ONLY TO BE ARRESTED AND DISRESPECTED BY GOVERNMENT. Please Share!
"You know, I have always shown respect to everyone in my family and beyond, Love despite differences. What makes you think I am doing anything different now?"
"Why do you think I am deeply affected mentally and physically now when logic and compassion are gone in communication?
😞 Billions of People around the world feel the lines have been crossed on many levels of governments throughout.
We have been peaceful the entire time in Canada."
"Selective Law" has now been proven in Ottawa by Peace-Man....
Everything done in this case is to mislead. Seriously, they are spending tens of thousands persecuting a man that stood in peace, with taxpayer money.
"Maybe if I was naked the police would look the other way? If Selective Law Enforcement have let this happen in our streets, how about within government?"
Ever hear of the Cullen Commission and its findings?
https://www.cullencommission.ca/
Question:
If all democracy is controlled by currency, are there any true democracies?
What you watch on CBC and CTV, Global is NOT reflective of the Truth.
They play the victim after bringing it upon themselves.
"Why would all sides want to hide information and not look at the true path over the last 4 years of our government?"
"Canadians will continue to demonstrate how to Hold the Line with Peace, and Dignity."
" Mr. Melfi maintains his innocence and states that the right of peaceful protest is fundamental to a healthy democracy. "
Most important documents I grew up living by is the Canadian Bill of Rights
Donations can be made directly to Dana-lee at dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com PW:Freedom
If you wish to help Peace-Man/Dana-lee Melfi fight for your Rights and Freedoms.
Prove this government has systemic corruption. Prove what they have done
is wrong and call for a public inquiry into the infiltration of our
government! Please Help.
This is the only place We ask or advertise for help.
Peace-Man has not sold or sells any official products to date. (others have)
Peace-Man has paid for the site to stay up until March of 2024.
"I could no longer afford to pay for my Peace-Man email and it has been disconnected and they tell me non recoverable. :( "
For Peace-Man to be able to show and share his perspective he needs help.
Please think about it?
If you wish to help fund my defence of these false charges
About Grenier Law
MONICK GRENIER
Monick practices law in Ottawa, Ontario at Grenier Law, and often works in association with other counsel. She focuses on Civil Litigation (personal injury, breach of contract, other), including matters before the Ontario and Superior Courts of Justice, Small Claims Court and Administrative Tribunals. She also has a Criminal Defence and provincial offences practice. She offers full representation and Limited Scope Retainers, where appropriate.
Monick articled in Toronto, prior to being called to the Ontario Bar in 2012. During law school, Monick completed Osgoode’s renowned Aboriginal Intensive program. She was active in the student community and was an Executive Member of two student groups (Osgoode Christian Legal Fellowship and the Indigenous Students’ Association).
For 20 years prior to being called to the bar, Monick held various support capacities in the legal field.Before completing her JD at Osgoode Hall Law School, Monick obtained a Master of Divinity at Tyndale Seminary in Toronto in 2006, and a Bachelor of Arts (Honours) from Carleton University in Ottawa in 1998. Monick taught English in Seoul, South Korea for one year following her undergrad. In her spare time, she is a part time student at the University of Ottawa studying Quebec civil law (LL.L).
Monick promotes access to justice and considers the law a ministry of service to her clients and the justice system. Monick brings a passion for the law and advocating for her clients. Monick values the application of wisdom in managing every case and in exploring satisfactory resolutions, if available, that are suitable to her clients’ needs and desires.
Monick is a member of the Canadian Bar Association, County of Carleton Law Association, Christian Legal Fellowship, Defence Counsel Association of Ottawa, Ontario Trial Lawyers Association, and Métis Nation of Ontario.
Grenier Law
https://peace-man.ca/about/f/peace-man-returns-to-ottawa
Peace-Man returns to Ottawa
Hello all! Please read!
So here is the scoop! I am not much for all the tic toxics and live videos sorry.
Because of all the confusion going on with Canadians being Rights and Freedoms advocates, once again I will stand in Ottawa to bring awareness that the most basic forms of protest are very effective in holding our governments accountable.
As per the conditions set out in my ilegal arrest I am not allowed to enter a "restricted area". Below is my request and response from the PLT team in Ottawa.
I show this as I find it very interesting on their unwillingness to cooperate with the citizens.
Dana-lee Melfi
"
After reading my conditions to the Ottawa police arrest on me. It says
if I wish to enter the restricted area that I contact Ottawa police and
ask for permission. I am doing that now for the dates Jan 26th 2023 to
Feb 20th 2023. I am no threat and only offer messages of peace and
dialogue. It says That Ottawa Police can grant me this without any court
approvals.
I have never been convicted of a crime and Ottawa is my birthplace.
I can give details on where I will stay and any other information you would like.
You want to talk about trust? Show some to a good citizen please.
An Olive branch if you will.
It can only help the relationship between citizens and the differences
they have by the actions of the Ottawa police and our controlling
government.
Because you are the one that started off by stating to me, my
responsibilities. I am trying to do that right now in a formal request
Thank you.
My email is Peaceman@Peace-Man.ca I would request a response from the Ottawa Police. You are my contact for this exact type of correspondence correct?
You can obtain a copy of my conditions as I am sure you are well aware. "
PLT Team Response:
Good
afternoon Mr. Melfi......... I've reviewed your conditions from the
Ottawa Police file 22-43251 ........ I do not see anything about being
able to enter the restricted area with police permission. I see
condition f) states that you are not to attend the area bound by Highway
417, Booth St, Ottawa River and the Rideau River in the City of Ottawa
and not to be within one kilometer of Parliament Hill EXCEPT for the
purposes of attending court or attending your legal counsel's office to
prepare a defense. I am referring to the Undertaking issued to you on
2022-02-19. If there is another release document you're referring to
please let me know and I'll look into it but I don't see any other
release document.
12:33 PM
Dana-lee Melfi
Page 3 section 8
"The mandatory condition and the conditions indicated by a check mark on
this "undertaking" (*by Ottawa Police) remain in effect until they are
"Cancelled" or "changed" (**Ottawa Police have done this undertaking and
can change the conditions) or until you have been discharged, sentenced
or discharged by the courts." (*4 options)
Section 9
"You are warned that, unless you have a lawful excuse" (***an option is
by asking those that laid the restrictions to "change" and allow my
request.)
I would not call it an excuse but more like my rights.
The language is excuse so I will give mine as a right of a citizen never
convicted of a crime and of no danger to commemorate my own actions at
my birthplace.
Section 10
"I understand that I do not have to accept the conditions and that, if I
do not accept the conditions,s, I will be brought to a justice for a
bail hearing"
Well I guess that depends on the Ottawa Police officer that is willing
to arrest me for against my rights and Freedoms The Ottawa Police must
abide by.
So Now I put it to you. I knew your answer before you sent it.
So, I am letting you know I did lead you to the correct document and is
determined by your understanding. Your willingness to study the
situation before answering. Your willingness to serve and protect.
Depends
on the Ottawa Police if they are willing to cooperate with a harmless
citizen. I will give copies of prepared statements as well. I will not
break a law as I have not done to date.
So now that you have the info and choices you need, please respond to my request in an email. Thank you for the consideration.
PLT Team
Police
cannot change the conditions once they have been filed with the court. I
encourage you to reach out to legal counsel, if you've retained
someone, and ask them to speak with the court to have your conditions
changed. Not withstanding that if you don't have the conditions change
you could be arrested and charged with breaching your release
conditions.
Dana-lee Melfi
Again sir, You are giving me false information.
Just like you said that you could not reach out to another protection
agency. I never asked you to dictate anything and asked for help with a
citizens safety. I do not even know why you would use that language. "a
police officer in the City of Ottawa cannot call another police service
and dictate to them what or how to investigate. This is what I believe
you are asking me to do." How you got this thought is exactly why you
cannot see that Ottawa Police can Change the conditions.
I have a lawyer, I cannot afford to add extra paperwork to your false
arrests. You think it is that easy for a person being wrongfully
persecuted to just call up a lawyer and do it thru them. I did btw.
The answer is still the same as described to you. There are four
choices. And Ottawa Police are able to "change" the conditions. I have 5
days to be able to carry out my Rights and Freedoms starting on Jan
26th.
I guess what you want is me standing one foot away then?
I am still requesting an official response to my request by email please.
I wish to talk to your supervisor or the chief please.
PLT Team
False information? I'm
sorry but I don't know what information you believe to be false? Police
and more specifically me as a police officer cannot arbitrarily change
release conditions. I have reviewed you release document and do not see
any mention of police being able to change release conditions and
frankly have never seen that on a release document before. You are more
than welcome to petition the court yourself to have to conditions
changed if you chose.
Dana-lee Melfi
No, I would like to speak to your supervisor or Chief please. And please have someone prepare an email to me.
Please have either one of them call me at their earliest convenience.
I never asked YOU to change my conditions. wow. I explained how you gave
out false information twice. Maybe you do not understand yet and need a
supervisor to help you.
PLT Team
I've passed your
request along. And again police cannot change conditions regardless of
who the officer is. Feel free to contact the officer who issues the
release document to you to confirm.
Dana-lee Melfi
You initiated
contact with me sir. Hmmm can you show me where Ottawa Police cannot
change conditions they have set? Nope. and as a matter of fact there is
precedent that it has happened in the past. You seem quite certain of
your decisions speaking on behalf of Ottawa Police and need to lean some
of your own policies.
I wonder if Sgt. Jim knows his policies?
PLT Team
Please feel free to contact Sgt. Killeen and speak with him regarding your conditions.
Dana-lee Melfi
No
I will speak to your supervisor first or Chief please. I have had the
non-pleasure of being victimized by Mr Jim already. He will have to be
accountable for his actions of false arrests with zero notes.
I asked nicely for you to cooperate and instead you took 3.5 mins to
respond with a personal view. Instead of trying to "work with the
people" as you advertise this is what you do. You have shown zero
concern for safety of a citizen. You have shown zero interest in sharing
proper information. You have shown zero credence of what the PLT team
gives it selves.
Your organization is is not looking out for public interests anymore and
has become obvious. What is it like standing where this Canadian cannot
because of disgusting illegal acts? You feel free sir?
When can I expect communication from a superior?
PLT Team
I have informed my Supervisor of your concerns but he has pressing matters to deal with at this time and will not be able to communicate with you until next week.
I never did receive an email.
Not wanting to ask very much online because of the amount of opportunists and griffters not representing real Rights and Freedoms advocates, it has been hard to garner support for peace-Man's cause.
I ask you to visit the www.Peace-Man.ca site to find out just what my missions and goals are!
So I thought of this! " I need some help and did not want to ask right out for it. So this way I give back make it fun and maybe we get thousands to start standing in silence and peace. Much could come from this if I have friends help and support. " Do you think you can do it?!!!!? I am a little rusty lol
Will you help me share this message? Are you a believer?
Peace-Man
Time to publicly address this
Peace Man from Ottawa protest represented by Justice Centre against mischief charges
OTTAWA: The Justice Centre has taken the case of Dana-Lee Melfi, popularly known as “Peace Man” during the Ottawa freedom convoy. Mr. Melfi was arrested on Saturday, February 19, 2022, in Ottawa during a peaceful protest, on various mischief related charges, including mischief, mischief to property, disobeying a lawful order, and obstructing justice.
Mr. Melfi maintains his innocence and states that the right of peaceful protest is fundamental to a healthy democracy.
Mr. Melfi has worked for government in various positions and stations, including within the Department of National Defence, in various Government buildings in Ottawa, on Parliament Hill, and in the Canadian War Museum. He attended the Ottawa protests wearing two cameras on his head and carrying a large Canadian flag. Mr. Melfi, who is ill with chronic conditions, personally protested many hours each day, enduring pain, standing still near Parliament Hill holding his flag in a peaceful stance.
Mr. Melfi did not have a vehicle at the protest and did not block any roads. He simply stood with his flag. Mr. Melfi states he was exercising his right to peaceful protest. Mr. Melfi however, may have come to the attention of the authorities, particularly after giving interviews to the Canadian Press, New York Times, Washington Post, Epoch Times and many independent media, which went viral around the world.
Ottawa lawyer Monick Grenier, on behalf of the Justice Centre, represents Mr. Melfi and will argue that there were no reasonable grounds to arrest Mr. Melfi, that he was arbitrarily detained, and subject to unreasonable search by police officers.
Mr. Melfi’s next court date is August 18, 2022.
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2022/02/trudeau-invoking-emergency-act-and.html
Saturday 19 February 2022
Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act and Freeland defending her liberal democracy byway of her bankster buddies
---------- Original message ----------
From: "St-Onge, Pascale - Députée" <pascale.st-onge@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 03:05:01 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : I trust that Higgy, Trudeau, Mendicino,
Blanchet, Singh and Andy Baby Fillmore know why I enjoyed what the ex
RCMP dude Rob Morrison just said in Paraiment
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Bonjour,
Au nom de la députée de Brome—Missisquoi, nous souhaitons accuser la
réception de votre correspondance. Soyez assuré que vos commentaires
ont été soigneusement examinés et qu'un retour s’effectuera dans les
meilleurs délais.
Si votre correspondance concerne un commentaire ou une suggestion,
soyez assuré que votre courriel sera acheminé à la députée, ainsi qu’à
son équipe, qui en prendront connaissance, et le partageront aux
instances gouvernementales concernées, le cas échéant.
Cordialement,
L’équipe de circonscription
//
Hello,
On behalf of the Member of Parliament for Brome—Missisquoi, we wish to
acknowledge receipt of your correspondence. Please be assured that
your comments have been carefully considered and that a return will be
made as soon as possible.
If your correspondence concerns a comment or a suggestion, please be
assured that your email will be forwarded to the Member of Parliament
and her team, who will take note of it and share it with the
government authorities concerned, if necessary.
Sincerely,
The constituency team
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Hardie, Ken - M.P." <Ken.Hardie@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 03:05:03 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: I trust that Higgy, Trudeau, Mendicino,
Blanchet, Singh and Andy Baby Fillmore know why I enjoyed what the ex
RCMP dude Rob Morrison just said in Paraiment
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Hello,
Thank you for contacting the office of Ken Hardie, Member of
Parliament for Fleetwood-Port Kells.
This automated response is to assure you that we have received your
correspondence.
To prevent the spread of COVID-19 by maintaining safety protocols and
seating capacity, the constituency office is closed to walk-ins
however, the team remains available to help you with your federal
inquiries, you can contact us at 604.501.5900 or if you prefer meeting
in person, we can schedule an appointment for you to visit our office
as such.
While every effort will be made by our team members to reply to your
queries and correspondence in a timely fashion, and we will be in
contact with you as soon as possible. To help us to accelerate the
process, please be certain to include your full name, home address,
including postal code and phone number in your correspondence to our
office.
If you require help with an issue and you reside outside of our
Fleetwood – Port Kells federal riding, please contact your local
Member of Parliament for assistance. If you are not certain who your
MP is, please visit Election Canada
Thank you again for contacting our office.
Ken Hardie
Member of Parliament
Fleetwood-Port Kells
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Murray, Joyce - M.P." <joyce.murray@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 03:05:03 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: I trust that Higgy, Trudeau, Mendicino,
Blanchet, Singh and Andy Baby Fillmore know why I enjoyed what the ex
RCMP dude Rob Morrison just said in Paraiment
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for contacting the office of MP Joyce Murray. This message
is to acknowledge receiving your communication, and that Ms. Murray
will respond as soon as possible.
Due to the high volume of correspondence, please note that Ms.
Murray’s priority is to answer mail received from residents of
Vancouver Quadra.
If you are a constituent of Vancouver Quadra please provide your
postal code and phone number, as she often responds by personal phone
call, workload permitting. If you are not sure who your Member of
Parliament is, you can find out by entering your postal code on the
Parliament website<http://www.ourcommons.
If another government department or Member of Parliament can best
address your inquiry, we will forward it to the appropriate office
with a request for response.
Ms. Murray receives many emails that are not addressed to her but on
which she is copied. She also receives many petition-based emails.
Please be assured that while these emails are noted, the volume of
correspondence she receives does not permit her to respond to each
individually.
Thank you again for your email and for your patience.
Kindest regards,
Office of the Hon. Joyce Murray | Bureau de l’hon. Joyce Murray
Member of Parliament, Vancouver Quadra | Députée, Vancouver Quadra
206 – 2112 W Broadway
Vancouver, BC V6K 2C8
Telephone : 604-664-9220
Fax: 604-664-9221
Email: joyce.murray@parl.gc.ca<
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Weiler, Patrick - M.P." <Patrick.Weiler@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 03:05:01 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: I trust that Higgy, Trudeau, Mendicino,
Blanchet, Singh and Andy Baby Fillmore know why I enjoyed what the ex
RCMP dude Rob Morrison just said in Paraiment
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
ATTENTION: Thank you very much for writing to me. This is to
acknowledge that I have received your correspondence and will read it
and reply as soon as I can. Also, please feel free to contact members
of my team directly:
Our Horseshoe Bay office in West Vancouver is here to serve all
constituents in West Vancouver-Sunshine Coast-Sea to Sky Country. We
also have satellite staff on the Sunshine Coast and Sea to Sky
Corridor to assist in serving constituents.
My Contituency Office is open from 9:00am - 5:00pm, Monday through
Friday. Should you have any questions, you can contact my staff and I
by calling 604-913-2660 or by emailing
Patrick.Weiler@parl.gc.ca<
For matters related to the Sunshine Coast such as requests for MP
telephone calls and general concerns related to the community and any
other questions, please contact Donna Bell at
Donna.Bell.842@parl.gc.ca.
For matters related to the Sea to Sky Corridor such as requests for MP
telephone calls and general concerns related to the community and any
other questions, please contact Christina Walsh at
Christina.Walsh.842@parl.gc.ca
For matters related to West Vancouver and all casework questions
including issues or concerns with any Federal Department or Agency
such as Service Canada (includes but not limited to OAS, GIS, EI or
CPP), Canada Revenue Agency, Immigration, Refugee and Citizenship
Canada, Passport Canada, Phoenix Pay System, Veteran Affairs or
Indigenous Affairs, please contact Natasha at
natasha.lepur.842@parl.gc.ca.
For media inquiries, please contact Kevin Hemmat at Kevin.Hemmat.842@parl.gc.ca.
Sincerely,
Patrick Weiler, MP
West Vancouver - Sunshine Coast - Sea-to-Sky Country
Rachel.Bendayan@parl.gc.ca, luc.berthold@parl.gc.ca,
Elisabeth.Briere@parl.gc.ca, francois-philippe.champagne@
sophie.chatel@parl.gc.ca, "dan.albas" <dan.albas@parl.gc.ca>,
john.aldag@parl.gc.ca, mel.arnold@parl.gc.ca, parm.bains@parl.gc.ca,
terry.beech@parl.gc.ca, frank.caputo@parl.gc.ca,
Marc.Dalton@parl.gc.ca, sukh.dhaliwal@parl.gc.ca,
todd.doherty@parl.gc.ca, ed.fast@parl.gc.ca,
kerry-lynne.findlay@parl.gc.ca, hedy.fry@parl.gc.ca,
Tracy.Gray@parl.gc.ca, ken.hardie@parl.gc.ca, ron.mckinnon@parl.gc.ca,
wilson.miao@parl.gc.ca, Rob.Morrison@parl.gc.ca,
joyce.murray@parl.gc.ca, taleeb.noormohamed@parl.gc.ca,
carla.qualtrough@parl.gc.ca, harjit.sajjan@parl.gc.ca,
randeep.sarai@parl.gc.ca, Mark.Strahl@parl.gc.ca,
Tako.VanPopta@parl.gc.ca, Patrick.Weiler@parl.gc.ca,
Sameer.Zuberi@parl.gc.ca, dominique.vien@parl.gc.ca,
pascale.st-onge@parl.gc.ca, peter.schiefke@parl.gc.ca,
brenda.shanahan@parl.gc.ca, Yves.Robillard@parl.gc.ca,
pablo.rodriguez@parl.gc.ca, sherry.romanado@parl.gc.ca,
Pierre.Paul-Hus@parl.gc.ca, Richard.Lehoux@parl.gc.ca,
joel.lightbound@parl.gc.ca, Steven.MacKinnon@parl.gc.ca,
Richard.Martel@parl.gc.ca, Soraya.MartinezFerrada@parl.
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "jagmeet.singh"
<jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Mendicino, Marco - M.P." <Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 02:39:30 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act and
Freeland defending her liberal democracy byway of her bankster buddies
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for contacting the constituency office of the Hon. Marco
Mendicino, P.C., M.P. for Eglinton—Lawrence.
Please be advised that our office has the capacity to assist with
requests within Eglinton—Lawrence only and we prioritize
correspondence from residents.
If you reside outside the riding and require assistance, you can
contact your local Member of Parliament by entering your postal code
here: https://www.ourcommons.ca/
If you are a resident of Eglinton—Lawrence and require assistance
continue reading below.
· For assistance with casework, we require your full name,
phone number, address and postal code to proceed.
· For non-ministerial meeting requests, we need to know
the nature of the meeting and we will respond back with possible
options.
· For media requests, the Press Secretary will get back to you.
To contact Public Safety Canada directly, please visit:
https://www.publicsafety.gc.
To contact Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada directly,
please email minister@cic.gc.ca or phone 613-954-1064.
For assistance with the situation in Afghanistan, please continue reading.
If you and your family require assistance regarding the rapidly
evolving situation in Afghanistan, detailed information on Canada’s
special measures to support Afghan nationals is available here:
https://www.canada.ca/en/
For Afghans who assisted the Government of Canada, please contact:
Canada-Afghanistan@
For questions on how Afghan nationals may reunite with their families
in Canada, or information on the humanitarian program to resettle
Afghans outside of Afghanistan, please contact:
IRCC.SituationAfghanistan.
You may also call 1-613-321-4243 from Monday to Friday, 6:30 a.m. to 7
p.m. (ET).
For Canadians in need of consular assistance in Afghanistan, please
contact Global Affairs Canada’s 24/7 Emergency Watch and Response
Centre in Ottawa at:
· Phone: 613-996-8885
· Email: sos@international.gc.ca
· SMS: 613-686-3658
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 00:48:59 +0000
Subject: RE: RE Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act and Freeland
defending her liberal democracy byway of her bankster buddies
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.
If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.
Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.
Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
pour examen et considération.
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144 or by email
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick E3B 5H1 Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Gladu, Marilyn - M.P." <Marilyn.Gladu@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 02:38:04 +0000
Subject: RE: RE Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act and Freeland
defending her liberal democracy byway of her bankster buddies
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for contacting the Office of M.P. Marilyn Gladu. This is an
acknowledgement of the receipt of your e-mail.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Gallant, Cheryl - M.P." <cheryl.gallant@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 02:38:06 +0000
Subject: RE: RE Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act and Freeland
defending her liberal democracy byway of her bankster buddies
To: "david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for taking the time to contact the office of Cheryl Gallant, M.P.
Due to the high volume of correspondence, priority is given to
residents of Renfrew-Nipissing-Pembroke.
Please, ensure your email includes your full name, mailing address,
and telephone number.
If your concern is urgent, or you need assistance with any federal
program or service, please, call the Constituency Office at
613-732-4404.
Sincerely,
Brendan Mulvihill
Parliamentary Assistant to Cheryl Gallant, M.P.
Renfrew-Nipissing-Pembroke
604 Justice Building
House of Commons
Ottawa, ON
K1A 0A6
613-992-7712
www.cherylgallant.com
---------- Original message --------------
From: "Julian, Peter - M.P." <peter.julian@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 02:29:26 +0000
Subject: Thank you for contacting our Parliament Hill office / Merci
d’avoir contacté notre bureau parlementaire
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
On behalf of Peter Julian, Member of Parliament (New
Westminster-Burnaby), we would like to thank you for contacting our
office. Peter always welcomes and appreciates receiving your comments
and suggestions, which are helpful to his work in both Canada’s
Parliament and in the Riding.
We want to assure you that your email has been received, will be
reviewed as soon as possible and acted upon should it be required. Due
to the high volume of electronic mail received, messages from
constituents of New Westminster-Burnaby will be given the highest
priority. Please be certain that you have included your first, last
name and mailing address (including your postal code) as well as the
particulars of the federal issue (s) you are concerned about. Thank
you.
As always, we serve the constituents of New Westminster-Burnaby with
resources, questions and concerns regarding federal departments and
agencies. Please don’t hesitate to be in touch with our office with
your concerns. Due to the rising COVID cases, we encourage you to
reach our Constituency Office team by email
peter.julian.c1@parl.gc.ca<mailto:peter.julian.c1@parl.
telephone: 604-775-5707. In-person appointments can be arranged when
necessary, but are subject to change according to the most recent
health regulations.
For the most up to date information on Canada’s response to COVID-19
as well as information on financial assistance and travel restrictions
please visit: https://www.canada.ca/en.html
Stay healthy and safe in these challenging times.
***
Nous vous remercions de prendre contact avec le bureau parlementaire
de Peter Julian, député dans la circonscription de New
Westminster-Burnaby. Peter est toujours heureux de recevoir vos
commentaires et vos suggestions qui sont utiles à son travail, tant au
Comté qu’au Parlement.
Soyez assuré que, malgré le grand nombre de courriels que nous
recevons chaque jour, nous accordons toujours la plus haute priorité
aux messages des commettants de New Westminster-Burnaby et que nous
examinerons votre courriel le plus tôt possible. NB : veuillez-vous
assurer SVP de bien nous indiquer les questions qui vous préoccupent
qui relève du domaine fédéral, ainsi que votre nom, votre prénom, et
adresse postale, y compris le code postal. Merci.
Comme toujours, notre bureau de circonscription est disponible pour
vous aider concernant toute question ou préoccupation relevant de la
compétence fédérale. En raison de l'augmentation des cas de COVID,
nous vous encourageons à contacter notre équipe par téléphone
604-775-5707 et par courriel
peter.julian.c1@parl.gc.ca<mailto:peter.julian.c1@parl.
obtenir de l’aide. Des rendez-vous en personne peuvent être fixés en
cas de besoin mais sont susceptibles d'être modifiés en fonction des
règlements sanitaires les plus récents.
Pour des renseignements à jour sur la réponse du Canada à la COVID-19,
l’aide financière et les restrictions de voyage, veuillez SVP
consultez ce lien : https://www.canada.ca/fr.html.
Restez en santé et en sécurité en cette période difficile.
Office of Peter Julian, MP (New Westminster-Burnaby) | Bureau du
député Peter Julian (New Westminster-Burnaby)
New Democratic Party | Nouveau Parti démocratique
We acknowledge that we work on the unceded traditional territory of
the Algonquin, Haudenosaunee and Anishinabek peoples.
Nous reconnaissons que nous travaillons sur le territoire non-cédé des
nations Algonquine, Haudenosaunee et Anishinabek.
New Westminster is located on the unceded and traditional territory of
the Halq'eméylem speaking Coast Salish peoples. This includes the
nations of the Qayqayt, qʼʷa:n̓ƛʼən̓ (Kwantlen), Katzie, kʷikʷəƛw̓əm
(Kwikwetlem), xʷməθkʷəy̓əm (Musqueam), Stó:lō, sc̓əwaθn məsteyəxʷ
(Tsawwassen), and Tsleil-Waututh.
Burnaby is located on the ancestral and unceded
homelands<https://www.
of the hən̓q̓əmin̓əm̓<http://www.
and Sḵwx̱wú7mesh<https://www.
speaking peoples as well as all Coast Salish peoples.
______________________________________________________
(TEL) 613.992.4214 | (CELL) 613.222.4074 | FAX) 613.947.9500
UFCW | TUAC
P Help save paper - do you need to print this email?
P Économisons le papier – est-il vraiment nécessaire d’imprimer ce courriel?
"My friends, love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear.
Optimism is better than despair. So let us be loving, hopeful and
optimistic. And we’ll change the world."
-Jack Layton, 1950-2011
« Mes amis, l’amour est cent fois meilleur que la haine. L’espoir est
meilleur que la peur. L’optimisme est meilleur que le désespoir. Alors
aimons, gardons espoir et restons optimistes. Et nous changerons le
monde. »
-Jack Layton, 1950-2011
This email message and any attachment may contain privileged or
confidential information and is intended only for the named
recipient(s) or group indicated. If you have received this message in
error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the sender and
delete this email message. Thank you for your cooperation.
Ce courriel, ainsi que tout fichier annexé peut contenir des
renseignements protégés ou confidentiels et concerne uniquement les
destinataires indiqués. Si vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, ou
si vous n'êtes pas les destinataires, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur
et l'effacer. Merci de votre coopération.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7YTeg-laf8&ab_channel=CBCNews%3ATheNational
Rare legal move freezes cash, crypto tied to Ottawa protest
https://twitter.com/DavidRaymondAm1/with_replies
YO @AndrewScheer @ElizabethMay @theJagmeetSingh @cafreeland @CandiceBergenMP Cops have the protesters cornered & the Trucker's leaders are in jail so why are you still not
https://www.cpac.ca/program?id=51
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lC4tlUkAP6o&ab_channel=MarcelIrnie
Emergencies Act - Parliament is suspended by Trudeau! Feb. 18 2022 #irnieracingnews
Butt launches Twitter tirade on Scheer for supporting truckers
“It’s a truly depressing turn for our politics to take in Canada. Have we paid no attention to what happened to US politics, and how it happened?”
Dave Naylor is the News Editor of the Western Standard and the Vice-President: News Division of Western Standard New Media Corp. He has served as the City Editor of the Calgary Sun and has covered Alberta news for nearly 40 years. dnaylor@westernstandardonline.com
Baffled by the Chaos in Canada? So Are Canadians.
The protests seem to challenge the cherished image that Canadians are moderate, rule-following and just plain nice. But was that really a myth all along?
Credit...Brett Gundlock for The New York Times
Catherine Porter is a Canadian journalist who worked for 16 years at the country’s largest newspaper before becoming Toronto bureau chief for The Times. She has spent a week talking to protesters, police and residents in Ottawa.
[Follow our live coverage of the Ottawa Protests.]
OTTAWA — It seemed a classically Canadian moment in a scene otherwise torn from the book of Trump America.
Between the intersection transformed into a mosh pit and the graceful Parliament buildings cluttered with “fake news,” “the Great Resist” and “Covid red pill” signs, a middle-aged man named Johnny Rowe perched on a median last weekend with an amplifier and a simple greeting.
“Welcome to Ottawa,” he called out to the hordes streaming down the middle of the street, many hollering “freedom.” “Thank you for coming.”
If the outside world is baffled by the scenes unfolding in the streets of Canada, so are many Canadians. They are dumbfounded, perhaps none more so than the government officials who have stood by largely slack-jawed as giant trucks stake out ground in the normally placid capital, shaking and honking at night as people cheer and dance, neighbors be damned.
As demonstrations kept flaring, the government on Monday invoked the Emergencies Act, which greatly increases the government’s power to crack down on protest, and in Alberta the police arrested 11 people and seized a large cache of weapons. Earlier, traffic resumed over the Ambassador Bridge, a major international route blockaded for a week, and officials announced that they were lifting some contentious vaccine pass requirements.
The chaos of recent weeks has left many wondering if Canada is witnessing the birth of a political alt-right, or if it is a pandemic-induced tantrum that, once exhausted, will curl itself asleep, leaving behind a country bewildered but essentially unchanged. It could also be, some argue, that the so-called freedom convoy is not an aberration at all but a mirror to an integral part of the country that doesn’t fit the stereotype, and so is ignored.
Credit...Brett Gundlock for The New York Times
The unrest seems a rebuff to the cherished mythology imposed on Canada’s
citizens from abroad and held by many Canadians themselves as moderate,
rule-following, levelheaded — and just plain nice.
Start with the pervasive slogan of the unrest, scrawled across trucks, hats, shirt and flags, an epithet startlingly vulgar by Canadian standards that urges Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to go away. Some say he should be not just deposed but imprisoned over the vaccine regulations governments in Canada have passed.
The anger is new. Over the past two years of public health crisis, Canadians have followed their classic playbook. Even right-leaning provincial governments dutifully took their lead, for the most part, from public health experts, passing strict pandemic rules that citizens then followed.
Credit...Brett Gundlock for The New York Times
While there have been some mask protests, more outrage was directed at local governments for not doing more to protect their citizens, and at politicians who broke the rules. Wearing a mask, and getting the vaccine, was deemed a basic act of civic solidarity. Canada has one of the highest rates in the world, with more than 83 percent of the population over the age of 5 having received at least two vaccine doses.
“Let’s take care of each other in this time of need, Canada,” Mr. Trudeau tweeted in March 2020, days after his wife showed symptoms and he became the first G7 leader to self-isolate. “Because that’s really who we are.”
Maybe it is because Canada, unlike the neighbor that overshadows it, was born not from revolution but from negotiation that its approach to rebellion now seems more than a little unconventional, even quirky. But one thing is clear: The members of the so-called freedom convoy are not bellowing “compromise” or “care for one another.”
The streets of downtown Ottawa echo with chants and slogans steeped in the language of the American Revolution, right down to the Don’t Tread on Me pennants. “Freedom,” yells a man in a red mask waving a Canadian flag. “Freedom,” comes the ardent reply. Though the flag, it should be noted, was held aloft in a quintessentially Canadian fashion, attached to a hockey stick.
Credit...Brett Gundlock for The New York Times
The repeated invocation of liberty is just one reason — along with the American, Confederate and Trump flags spotted in the mix — many believe the unrest is essentially a U.S. import.
For two years, Canadians have been largely stuck at home, and many have spent more time in front of the screen than ever. As they did, they absorbed the American culture war being played out from Fox News to Breitbart, and Trumpian ideas took root in Canada, said Gerald Butts, a longtime friend of Mr. Trudeau’s and his former top political aide.
It was not just ideas.
Right-wing activists in the United States and elsewhere have lent more than moral support to their new kindred spirits in Canada. They are opening their wallets. At least some of the money that has allowed the protesters to keep their trucks fueled and cover other expenses has flowed in from untraceable sources on crowdfunding platforms and cryptocurrencies.
Canadian political veterans have taken note.
“We ran the longest federal election campaign in history in 2015, and we spent $42 million, right?” said Mr. Butts.
By comparison, in just a few weeks, the truckers raised about a quarter of that.
“One of the most concerning things about this movement,” Mr. Butts said, “is it’s shown how easy it is to pour millions of dollars of dark money into Canadian politics.”
The question now is how might that play out in the months and years ahead.
Credit...Brett Gundlock for The New York Times
Traditionally, Canadian politics is a fight for the center, not for the fringes of the ideological spectrum. Political analysts point out that the far-right People’s Party of Canada, whose leader, Maxime Bernier, is a champion of the trucker protest, did not win a single seat in last year’s parliamentary election.
But, populism isn’t totally alien to the country, points out Janice Stein, a political science professor at the University of Toronto. A populist, the brother of the Ontario Premier Doug Ford, was once mayor of the country’s biggest city, Toronto, and for years, the Reform party rallied around a sense of Western alienation and socially conservative values.
“There’s a worrying tendency in Canada to define everything pushing against our founding myth as an import from the United States,” Ms. Stein said. “We have mythologized our niceness: ‘We are not polarized like France and Britain, and the only major democratic country in which the center has held is Canada, and that’s because we’re so nice and so caring to each other.’”
Understand the Trucker Protests in Canada
Voicing grievances. A demonstration by truck drivers protesting vaccine mandates has ballooned into a nationwide movement that has slowed the economy and brought life to a standstill in parts of Canada. Here’s what to know:
Canadian politics may in fact be more genteel than in many other places, but not because Canadians are innately kinder. That has just become a lot clearer.
“This is a myth-busting moment,” Ms. Stein said.
Sooner or later, the trucks will depart, but will the movement the prime minister dismissed as a “small fringe minority” continue to grow? Some have their doubts.
“This is a one-off political expression,” said Paul Summerville, co-author of the book “Reclaiming Populism,” which argues that Canada’s strong socialized medicine and affordable education system has given the country a sense of fairness and equal opportunity, inoculating it against populism.
“People are tired, they are angry,” said Mr. Summerville, a former investment banker in Victoria, British Columbia. “This is a very specific moment that has to do with people feeling very uncomfortable for the last two years, because of the pandemic.”
The unrest has infuriated many Ottawa residents, who have led counterprotests against what they view as an intimidating occupation of their city. But they have also drawn huge crowds of supporters, particularly on the weekends, when the downtown has been turned into what feels like a raucous tailgate party, alternative news convention and brewing witch hunt, all at the same time.
Credit...Brett Gundlock for The New York Times
Strangers stop for impromptu conversations, hug and beam at one another, smiling widely — which after two years of mask wearing offers an emotional balm. One woman paraded the streets with a sign exhorting people to show her their teeth.
It does not take long to hear stories of personal suffering, and to understand why an ordinarily rule-abiding people might decide that a little rebellion is called for.
“Every single one of these people, has been catastrophically hurt,” said Mr. Rowe, the protester, lowering his megaphone for a moment. A Bikram Yoga instructor from the city of Kingston, two hours away, Mr. Rowe listed his losses over the past two years, tears brimming in his eyes: his home, his business and half of his retirement savings. And then there was the death of his brother-in-law.
“The suffering has gotten to a level where they have nothing to lose,” he said.
Compared with many countries, Canada was let off easy by Covid, with far fewer deaths per capita than the United States. But it came at a heavy cost.
Restrictions have been heavy and long. Almost two years after the pandemic hit Canada, the country remains in various stages of lockdown, with indoor dining banned in the country’s two largest provinces, Ontario and Quebec, until only recently. Residents of old-age homes were locked in for the better part of a year across the country. Students in Ontario missed more in-class learning than anywhere in North America, local newspapers state.
Recent polls show that most Canadians disagree with the tactics of the so-called freedom convoy, and worry that the country’s democracy is being threatened. But, many feel sympathy for protesters, particularly younger Canadians.
“Imagine storm clouds on horizon,” said Darrell Bricker, chief executive of the polling company Ipsos Public Affairs. “That has to discharge somewhere. This is part of the discharge.”
Among those people watching the scenes unfold in Ottawa is one of the city’s two poet laureates, Albert Dumont. An Algonquin elder, Mr. Dumont rejects not just the protesters’ notion of freedom, given its effect on local residents, but the whole idea that Canada was ever particularly nice, or even tolerant.
“My dad didn’t get to vote until 1960 — that’s not long ago,” he said. “There was a time when Canada was ugly and very cruel to Indigenous people.”
Catherine Porter is the Canada bureau chief, based in Toronto. Before she joined The Times in 2017, she was a columnist and feature writer for The Toronto Star, Canada’s largest-circulation newspaper. @porterthereport
Ryan Alford: Hiding behind national security will erode trust in Emergencies Act inquiries
When it comes to the judgment of whether the Trudeau government abused its emergency powers, justice must not only be done, it must also be seen to be done
Half a year has gone by since the Trudeau government took the unprecedented step of invoking the Emergencies Act to deal with protesters in Ottawa and at several border crossings. Yet the question of whether this was an appropriate and measured use of emergency powers or an unconstitutional power grab seems no closer to being answered — and likely won’t be, so long as Ottawa continues to hide behind a veil of secrecy.
At both the special joint committee on the declaration of the emergency and in Federal Court, the government has repeatedly invoked cabinet confidentiality to withhold the information that the Incident Response Group (IRG) allegedly relied on to conclude that the Freedom Convoy was a threat to the security of Canada linked to ideologically motivated violent extremism, which is the essential precondition for the lawful use of emergency powers.
If the IRG had no reasonable basis for concluding that a threat of this nature existed, the government expanded its own powers contrary to both law and the Constitution. This would be the most serious assault on the rule of law imaginable. Yet it increasingly appears as though the government’s conclusion had been tenuous at best.
Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino has stated repeatedly that the police requested the invocation of the Emergencies Act, only to be contradicted with sworn testimony from every police service on the scene.
Later, it was revealed that the federal government declared an emergency, despite being told of a possible breakthrough in talks between the City of Ottawa and the convoy organizers the day before. That deal would have seen many, if not all, of the trucks leaving residential areas. Since the Windsor, Ont., and Coutts, Alta., blockades had already been lifted, this might have catalyzed a peaceful end to the protests.
Despite these revelations, what we might never know looms large over what has come to light, as numerous documents pertaining to the government’s decision that were ordered released by the Federal Court have been so heavily redacted, they now resemble black rectangles with page numbers.
To counter the negative impression this lack of transparency created, the government declared with great fanfare that it would waive cabinet confidentiality before the Public Order Emergency Commission, which intends “to examine and assess the basis for the government’s decision to declare a public order emergency.” Unfortunately, this may prove to be yet another empty promise.
While the commission appears to have shamed the government into waiving one form of confidentiality, Ottawa has another, more powerful privilege that it can rely upon to redact documents and shield its witnesses: national security confidentiality (NSC).
The government fought hard to ensure NSC provisions were included in the commission’s “rules of practice and procedure,” which suggests that it is intent on using them. This, despite the fact that there have been numerous judicial findings of the overuse and misuse of national security confidentiality, particularly when it has been used to disguise the weaknesses of the government’s conclusions about security risks.
As then-Supreme Court chief justice Beverley McLachlin wrote in Canada v. Harkat, judges “must be vigilant and skeptical with respect to the minister’s claims of confidentiality. Courts have commented on the government’s tendency to exaggerate claims of national security confidentiality.”
As Associate Chief Justice of Ontario Dennis O’Connor noted when sitting as the commissioner of the Arar inquiry, the overuse of national security confidentiality “promotes public suspicion and cynicism.… It is very important that, at the outset of proceedings of this kind, every possible effort be made to avoid overclaiming.”
The Public Order Emergency Commission is well aware of this problem: in its rules, it states that it “expects the government to take a considered, proportionate and reasonable approach in making assertions of NSC.”
National security confidentiality is dangerous to an inquiry because it can be wielded not only as a shield, but as a sword. It allows for extensive redactions of intelligence reports the government chooses to submit to bolster its case, but the government can also deploy it to place dubious material before commissioner Paul Rouleau, in a manner that bypasses the challenges that are necessary to determine its reliability. Witnesses may testify outside of the presence of the public and the parties, and documents may be admitted but never seen by anyone other than the commissioner and his staff.
The inquiry’s ultimate conclusion about whether the government engaged in a grossly unconstitutional abuse of power will likely turn on its findings about the links between the Freedom Convoy and ideologically motivated violent extremists. The protesters have pointed to the efforts they took to exclude anyone advocating violence and will likely testify to that effect and be cross-examined vigorously.
In the absence of any contradictory evidence that they were influenced by extremists, the government will likely shift to a different claim: that the protests have emboldened extremists. Indeed, redacted “threat highlights” from the Integrated Terrorism Assessment Centre have already described the convoy protesters as a dangerous catalyst for anger on the far right.
It remains to be seen whether the commission would accept an argument that the emboldening of otherwise unaffiliated extremists could suffice as a rationale for the government to reasonably conclude that a threat to the security of Canada existed.
That would be problematic, as the Emergencies Act states that a public order emergency of this nature must arise from the threat of violent extremism, not that it might merely create an opportunity for other bad actors. Approving the use of emergency powers to limit Canadians’ charter rights of freedom of speech and assembly because of their possible unintended consequences would have dystopian implications.
These serious constitutional infirmities may not be obvious if the government’s assertions are packaged withing alarming hypothetical scenarios and presented behind closed doors, untested through the cross-examination of expert witnesses. To make matters worse, the agencies tasked with formulating and delivering these confidential assessments have a history of being unfaithful to the law, and to the truth.
Less than two years ago, revelations of the security establishment’s disturbing approach to investigating and reporting on extremism led to harsh condemnation by the Federal Court, which criticized it for demonstrating “a degree of institutional disregard for — or, at the very least, a cavalier institutional approach to — the duty of candour and regrettably the rule of law.”
An official conclusion that the government had a reasonable basis to conclude that the Freedom Convoy represented a threat to the security of Canada predicated on secret intelligence detailing vague links between those engaged in peaceful protests and extremists would only deepen the public cynicism that Justice O’Connor warned about, especially since we have had so many other warnings from eminent jurists of the government’s propensity to exaggerate such claims.
When it comes to the judgment of whether the Trudeau government abused its emergency powers, justice must not only be done, it must also be seen to be done. Findings in favour of the government on the basis of secret evidence that might never be seen will never be trusted. The preservation of the rule of law requires, to use the Public Order Emergency Commission’s words, a “transparent and thorough review of the circumstances that led to the declaration of a public order emergency.”
National Post
Ryan Alford is a professor in the Bora Laskin Faculty of Law at Lakehead University and a senior fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute. He was granted joint standing with the Canadian Constitution Foundation as a party before the Public Order Emergency Commission.
RE The "Peace-Man" returns to court in Ottawa on Monday Correct?
Dana-lee Melfi<dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com> | Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 7:02 PM |
| To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | |
David Amos<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 1:07 PM |
| To: Dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com, monick@grenierlaw.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, ps.ministerofpublicsafety-ministredelasecuritepublique.sp@ps-sp.gc.ca, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.fin" <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino" <Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, "Nathalie.G.Drouin" <Nathalie.G.Drouin@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, "Michael.Duheme" <Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca> | |
Now that "Peace-Man" is before the court he may enjoy checking some of my work about war etc ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 04:59:35 -0300 Subject: YO Minister Marco Mendicino Methinks its High Time that you and I create a MOU N'esy Pas Ian Nunn??? To: bestdamnroofer@hotmail.com, freedomcentralcanada@gmail.com "Marco.Mendicino" <Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Norman Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>, sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, "stefanos.karatopis" <stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com> <davesteenburg269@gmail.com>, "freedomreport.ca" <freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>, Viva Frei <david@vivafrei.com>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Bill.Hogan" <Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>, natasha.calvinho@gmail.com, "Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Mike.Comeau" <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, "Anita.Anand" <Anita.Anand@parl.gc.ca>, "fin.minfinance-financemin. <fin.minfinance-financemin. <Chrystia.Freeland@parl.gc.ca> <Candice.Bergen@parl.gc.ca>, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "pierre.poilievre" <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, maverickmultimedia@mail.com, inunn@superaje.com, artinfo6@digitaldoor.net, temp3@digitaldoor.net Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, livefromtheshed2022@gmail.com, freedom2canada@outlook.com, gregory.re@fox.com, Cmd4pc@gmail.com, james@jamesbowielaw.com, ontario@cp.org, JustinWells@foxnews.com, ottawanews@ctv.ca, Michael.Kempa@uottawa.ca, drkempa@gmail.com https://twitter.com/ David Raymond Amos’s Tweets · Apr 6 David Raymond Amos @DavidRaymondAm1 Replying to @DavidRaymondAm1 @DanDonovan4 and 42 others YO @realGonzaloLira Go Figure why the link I offered you within @YouTube was blocked https://davidraymondamos3. #UkraineRussianWar #cdnpoli 366 Comments David Amos Say Hoka Hey to NATO or me https://youtube.com/watch?v= youtube.com Vanished: Is There a NATO General In Mariupol? A good introduction to the entire Skripal affair, and the unanswered questions: http://johnhelmer.net/four- David Raymond Amos @DavidRaymondAm1 Replying to @DavidRaymondAm1 @DanDonovan4 and 44 others I heard through the grapevine that you ain't dead yet but have been muzzled bigtime #UkraineRussianWar #cdnpoli Too bad so sad that these dudes were not honest with mean old me just you dudes never were EH? @ikwilson @wikileaks @guardian @ggreenwald https://www.youtube.com/watch? youtube.com FOOD PLANT FIRES: LIVE NEWS COVERAGE...THE CONSPIRACY...THE SHORTAGES Freedom Reporter and researcher Ian Nunn joins the conversation with the newest data surrounding a bizarre chain of Food Processing Plant fires across the U.... Mar 26 Gonzalo Lira @realGonzaloLira You want to learn the truth about the Zelensky regime? Google these names: Vlodymyr Struk Denis Kireev Mikhail & Aleksander Kononovich Nestor Shufrych Yan Taksyur Dmitri Djangirov Elena Berezhnaya If you haven’t heard from me in 12 hours or more, put my name on this list. GL David Raymond Amos @DavidRaymondAm1 Replying to @realGonzaloLira This was the last I heard from you https://www.youtube.com/watch? youtube.com Scott Ritter and The Battle of the Donbas My Telegram channel: https://t.me/realCRPMy Twitter: https://twitter.com/ content: https://www.patreon.com/Co.. https://davidraymondamos3. Monday, 26 April 2021 YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON STALKER, all the NATO dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam https://www.youtube.com/watch? Ready for nuclear holocaust with Russia over Ukraine? 100,941 views •Apr 16, 2021 5.2K160Share Save Tulsi Gabbard Are we prepared to see our loved ones burn alive in a nuclear holocaust in a war with Russia over Ukraine? If not, cut out the macho saber rattling and deescalate before it's too late. 2,080 Comments David Amos David Amos Why did you ignore me when you were running for Presidential Office??? https://davidraymondamos3. https://twitter.com/ David Raymond Amos @DavidRaymondAm1 Replying to @JonathanVize We just talked about this video that you dudes published Please say Hey to @HarjitSajjan and the Boyz for me will ya? https://www.youtube.com/watch? Canada on alert as Russia military moves into Arctic 846,650 views Apr 7, 2021 Inside The Story The Russian military has built a network of bases and stations along its northern coast in recent years, while developing new weapons that could hit North America. 3,852 Comments David Amos David Amos Hmmmm ---------- Original message ---------- From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 23:52:37 -0300 Subject: I trust that his minion Mark Koneda of US Naval Intel and his FBI pals know why I had no respect for their Biden's old buddy Rep. Alcee Hastings for rather obvious reasons To: Dawn.McArdle@mail.house.gov, Matt.Gaetz@mail.house.gov, bgordon@anchorsgordon.com, patrick.parsons@mail.house.gov nia_ig.fct@navy.mil, art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca, "Greta.Bossenmaier" <Greta.Bossenmaier@hq.nato.int <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, "robert.mckee" <robert.mckee@gnb.ca> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Ian.Shugart" <Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nt.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "fin.minfinance-financemin. <fin.minfinance-financemin. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/ Rep. Alcee Hastings dies, narrowing Democratic House majority to just 7 Published Tue, Apr 6 202110:44 AM EDTUpdated Tue, Apr 6 20214:01 PM EDT Christian Nunley @cnunley7 Share Key Points Rep. Alcee Hastings, D-Fla., died Tuesday at age 84 after a two-year bout with pancreatic cancer. Democrats now hold a narrower margin in the House, with a 218-211 split, while six vacant seats remain. Rep. Alcee Hastings, D-Fla., listens to students speak about their experiences with gun violence during the The Gun Violence Prevention Task Force panel Wednesday afternoon May 23, 2018. Sarah Silbiger | CQ-Roll Call, Inc. | Getty Images Rep. Alcee Hastings, D-Fla., died Tuesday after a more than two-year bout with pancreatic cancer, NBC News confirmed. Hastings, who served in the House for nearly three decades, was 84. Throughout his career, he held several key committee assignments and leadership positions, most recently as vice chairman of the rules committee. He had also been Florida’s first Black federal trial judge, appointed to the bench in 1979 by President Jimmy Carter. “As an attorney, civil rights activist and judge, and over his nearly thirty years in Congress, he fought tirelessly to create opportunities to lift up working families, communities of color, children and immigrants,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi wrote in a statement. President Joe Biden reacted to Hastings’ death on Tuesday afternoon. “Across his long career of public service, Alcee always stood up to fight for equality, and always showed up for the working people he represented,” he said in a statement. “Jill and I are saddened to learn of his passing.” Democrats now hold a narrower advantage in the House, 218-211, giving the party a smaller margin of error in passing legislation. Six seats are vacant, four of which were previously held by Democrats and two by Republicans. Three of the four Democratic House seats were vacated by appointments to positions in President Joe Biden’s Cabinet. Deb Haaland, of New Mexico, was appointed secretary of the Department of Interior; Marcia Fudge, of Ohio, was named head of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and Cedric Richmond, of Louisiana, became senior advisor to the president and director of the White House Office of Public Engagement. One of the two vacant GOP seats is no longer up for contest. Julia Letlow of Louisiana was elected in late March but has yet to be sworn in. Julia will replace her late husband, Luke Letlow, who was elected to the seat but died before being sworn in due to Covid-19 complications. In 1983, when Hastings was a federal judge, he was acquitted in criminal court on a charge of conspiring to solicit a bribe in exchange for leniency in a sentencing. Alcee Hastings testifying at his impeachment trial in 1989. Michael Jenkins | CQ-Roll Call, Inc. | Getty Images Nevertheless, the House impeached Hastings in 1988 amid accusations that he perjured himself during that criminal trial. The Senate voted to convict him, removing him from the bench, but did not vote to disqualify him from holding future office. Hastings appealed the impeachment conviction in 1992. A federal judge overturned the conviction, on the grounds that a 12-member Senate committee, rather than the full Senate, conducted the impeachment trial. This was the first time a Senate conviction was overturned by a federal judge. The next year, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled federal courts do not have the authority to review the procedures of a Senate impeachment trial. Hastings’ legislative career, which began with his election in 1992 and continued until his death, was unaffected by the decision. On 4/6/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: NIA_IG <nia_ig.fct@navy.mil> > Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 11:03:08 +0000 > Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] Fwd: Methinks the evil lawyer Howie > Cooper made a deal with the VERY NASTY FBI dudes in Beantown N'esy Pas > Howie Anglin? > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. > > Dear David Amos, > The Naval Intelligence Activity (NIA) Office of the Inspector General > (IG) reviewed your email and attached .WAV file provided to the NIA > Hotline on 2 April 2021. I found no connection to the United States > Navy or United States Naval Intelligence. > > Naval Inspectors General exist to improve the efficiency and > effectiveness of US Navy Programs, and strive to eliminate and prevent > waste, fraud, and abuse with their respective departments. Naval IGs > are restricted to assessing matters falling within the purview of > their respective commanders. > > Citing the lack of an apparent connection to the US Navy or Naval > Intelligence, I am unable to provide further assistance, or provide > direct referral to any other agency or activity. > > Sincerely, > > Mark Koneda > Investigator > Naval Intelligence Activity > Office of the Inspector General > NIA_IG@navy.mil > (301)669-3030 (unclass) > TSVOIP 560-3030 > > INSPECTOR GENERAL SENSITIVE INFORMATION - FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY The > information contained in this email and any accompanying attachments > may contain Inspector General sensitive or pre-decisional information, > which is protected from mandatory disclosure under the Freedom of > Information Act (FOIA, 5 USC Section 552). It should not be released > to unauthorized persons. If you are not the intended recipient of this > information, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of > any action in reliance on this information is prohibited. If you > received this email in error, please notify this office by email or by > calling (301) 669-3030. > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. > Sent: Friday, April 2, 2021 12:50 PM > To: NIA_IG <nia_ig.fct@navy.mil> > Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Fwd: Methinks the evil lawyer Howie Cooper > made a deal with the VERY NASTY FBI dudes in Beantown N'esy Pas Howie > Anglin? Friday, 2 April 2021 Russia warns NATO against deploying troops to Ukraine https://twitter.com/ Image David Raymond Amos @DavidRaymondAm1 Replying to @DavidRaymondAm1 @Nyonitz and 49 others NATO has been picking a fight long before this weekend but big media ain't been saying much about it until now Methinks it was no coincidence US Naval Intel people called me on Good Friday N'esy Pas? https://davidraymondamos3. #nbpoli #cdnpoli #CORRUPTION https://www.ctvnews.ca/world/ Ukraine says Russia massing troops on border; U.S. warns Moscow Dmytro Gorshkov AFP Staff Agence France-Presse’s network of 201 bureaus covers 151 countries, with 80 nationalities represented among its 2,400 collaborators. AFP is a global news agency delivering in-depth coverage of the events shaping our world from conflicts to politics, economics, sports, entertainment and the latest breakthroughs in health, science and technology. The Agency operates regional hubs in five geographical zones: Africa, North America, Latin America, Asia, Middle East Published Thursday, April 1, 2021 4:09PM EDT Ukraine Ukraine has been locked in a conflict with Russian-backed separatists since 2014. (AFP) KYIV, UKRAINE -- Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Thursday accused Moscow of building up troops on his country's border as the United States warned Russia against "intimidating" Ukraine. Kiev has been locked in a conflict with Russian-backed separatists since 2014, and this week Ukrainian officials reported Russian troop movement in annexed Crimea and on the border, near territories controlled by Moscow-backed separatists. On Thursday, Zelensky's ministers discussed the escalating security situation with Western allies including U.S. Secretary of Defence Lloyd Austin. "Muscle-flexing in the form of military exercises and possible provocations along the border are traditional Russian games," Zelensky said in a statement. He accused Moscow of seeking to create "a threatening atmosphere" as Kiev hopes to resume a ceasefire brokered last year. The U.S. State Department said it was "absolutely concerned by recent escalations of Russian aggressive and provocative actions in eastern Ukraine." "What we would object to are aggressive actions that have an intent of intimidating, of threatening, our partner Ukraine," State Department spokesman Ned Price told reporters. Some observers say the reported Russian troop buildup is a test for the administration of U.S. President Joe Biden, who caused an uproar in Moscow last month by calling his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin a "killer". This week, Moscow and Kyiv blamed each other for a rise in violence between government forces and Kremlin-backed separatists in eastern Ukraine, which has undermined the ceasefire. Zelensky said 20 Ukrainian servicemen had been killed and 57 wounded since the start of the year. Separately, the military announced that a Ukrainian soldier was wounded in an attack it blamed on separatists. 'READY FOR AN OFFENSIVE' On Thursday, U.S. Secretary of Defence Austin called his Ukrainian counterpart Andriy Taran, Ukraine's defence ministry said. Austin said during the call that Washington would "not leave Ukraine alone in the event of escalating Russian aggression", the ministry said. Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba for his part discussed the "aggravation by the Russian Federation of the security situation" on the frontline with his Canadian counterpart Marc Garneau. Ukraine's military intelligence accused Russia of preparing to "expand its military presence" in the separatist-controlled eastern regions of Donetsk and Lugansk. In a statement, the intelligence service said it "does not rule out" an attempt by Russian forces to move "deep into Ukrainian territory". A high-ranking Ukrainian government official, speaking on condition of anonymity, claimed that the Russian army was practising "military co-ordination" with separatists. "From mid-April their combat units will be ready for an offensive," the official told AFP. WEST SHOULD NOT 'WORRY' Moscow has repeatedly denied sending troops and arms to buttress the separatists and Putin's spokesman stressed on Thursday that Moscow is at liberty to move troops across its territory. "The Russian Federation moves its armed forces within its territory at its discretion," spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters, but he did not directly confirm a troop buildup on the Ukrainian border. He added that "it should not worry anyone and does not pose a threat to anyone". The war in eastern Ukraine broke out in 2014 when Russia annexed the Crimean peninsula following a bloody uprising that ousted Ukraine's Kremlin-friendly president Viktor Yanukovych. On Wednesday, the Pentagon said U.S. forces in Europe had raised their alert status following the "recent escalations of Russian aggression in eastern Ukraine". Mark Milley, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, also spoke with his Russian and Ukrainian counterparts, Valery Gerasimov and Ruslan Khomchak. Khomchak said this week that 28,000 separatist fighters and "more than 2,000 Russian military instructors and advisers" are currently stationed in eastern Ukraine. On Thursday, the deputy head of Zelensky's office, Roman Mashovets, called for joint drills with NATO forces to "help stabilise the security situation". Zelensky was elected in 2019 promising to end the years-long conflict, but critics say a shaky ceasefire was his only tangible achievement. The fighting has claimed more than 13,000 lives since 2014, according to the United Nations. https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/ Top US national security officials call counterparts as Russia and Ukraine tensions rise By Oren Liebermann and Barbara Starr, CNN Updated 8:54 PM ET, Wed March 31, 2021 An Andromeda-D automated control system takes part in an exercise held by units of the Novorossiysk guards mountain air assault division of the Russian Airborne Troops at Opuk range in Crimea. An Andromeda-D automated control system takes part in an exercise held by units of the Novorossiysk guards mountain air assault division of the Russian Airborne Troops at Opuk range in Crimea. (CNN)Top US national security officials have spoken with their Ukrainian counterparts, and America's top general held a call Wednesday with his Russian opposite number amid concern over Russian military activity in Crimea and eastern Ukraine, including what the US deemed a violation of a ceasefire by Moscow that led to the deaths of four Ukrainian soldiers last week. "Russia's destabilizing actions undermine the de-escalation intentions that had been achieved through [last year's agreement]," chief Pentagon spokesman John Kirby said Wednesday. "Additionally, we are aware of Ukrainian military reports concerning Russian troop movements on Ukraine's borders." Secretary of State Tony Blinken reaffirmed the "unwavering support" of the United States for Ukraine's territorial integrity in the face of "Russia's ongoing aggression in the Donbas and Crimea," according to a readout of his call with Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba Wednesday. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley also spoke to the top Ukrainian general Wednesday, while national security adviser Jake Sullivan spoke with his Ukrainian counterpart at the beginning of the week. The Pentagon had grown increasingly concerned after military intelligence reports assessed that some 4,000 heavily armed Russian forces had been observed moving in Crimea, according to a US defense official. "It was not totally clear what they were up to," the official said, adding that the US now believes on further assessment it may have been part of a Russian military exercise. Part of that assessment was based on calls with Ukrainian officials who also viewed the Russian activity as an exercise. If so, the movement of so many Russian military personnel was a large exercise and may be a deliberate message from the Kremlin to the Biden administration about Russia's strength in the region and its ability to challenge US allies, the official said. This comes as NATO countries on Monday scrambled jets 10 times to track an unusually high level of Russian military flights over a large area of Europe including the North Sea, the Black Sea and the Baltic Sea. NATO jets wound up conducting six intercepts in a six-hour period. The Biden administration is taking a tougher approach to Russia, and Ukraine is only the latest source of tension between the two adversaries. The White House unveiled a raft of sanctions against Russian officials and entities at the beginning of the month over the poisoning of opposition leader Alexey Navalny. President Joe Biden then warned that Russian President Vladimir Putin would "pay a price" for his efforts to undermine the 2020 US elections and went on to call Putin a "killer." Meanwhile, the administration is expected to impose more sanctions on Russia over election interference and the SolarWinds cyberattack. Classified US military war game set to take place as concerns about threats posed by China and Russia increase Classified US military war game set to take place as concerns about threats posed by China and Russia increase On Wednesday, Milley spoke with his Russian counterpart, Gen. Valery Gerasimov. While the topics the two generals discussed have not been made public, behind the scenes the Defense Department has been concerned for the last several days about the build-up of Russian troops and equipment along the Ukraine border. The Defense Department recently raised the so-called "watch condition level" on that region to gather updated intelligence assessments on Russian activity and intentions, while monitoring any potential threats. The New York Times was first to report that development. Russia blamed Ukraine for renewed fighting in eastern Ukraine. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said this week that Russia was concerned about "Ukraine's provocations," but he said he hoped it would not escalate to fighting. But Ukraine warned of a series of Russian violations of the ceasefire, including two incidents of mortar fire and large-caliber machine gun fire that led to the death of the four Ukrainian soldiers last Friday. On Tuesday, Ukraine accused Russia of violating the ceasefire seven times, prompting the country's parliament to call for an increase in political and economic pressure on Moscow. https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/ NATO scrambles jets 10 times to track Russian military planes across Europe By Barbara Starr, CNN Pentagon Correspondent Updated 1:33 PM ET, Tue March 30, 2021 Norwegian F-16s intercepted two Russian Tu-95 bombers of the type shown here. Norwegian F-16s intercepted two Russian Tu-95 bombers of the type shown here. (CNN)NATO scrambled fighter jets 10 times Monday to track and intercept an unusually "rare peak" of Russian bombers and fighters flying over the North Sea, Black Sea and Baltic Sea, according to a NATO official. "NATO aircraft intercepted six different groups of Russian military aircraft near alliance airspace in less than six hours," the organization said in a statement. The Russian activity across an unusually wide area of European skies came on the same day North American Aerospace Defense Command said it tracked Russian aircraft off the coast of Alaska. None of the Russian aircraft entered the national airspace of NATO nations in Europe and the intercepts were considered safe, but an alliance statement detailed the activity. Norwegian F-16s scrambled after radars detected two groups of Russian military aircraft near Norway's coastline. The Norwegians intercepted two Tu-95 Bear bombers which flew south over the North Sea. That prompted the United Kingdom to send up Typhoon aircraft and Belgium to deploy F-16 fighters. The Norwegian F-16s later intercepted two Tu-160 bombers over international waters nearby. Separately, NATO radars detected three Russian military aircraft near allied airspace over the Black Sea which were tracked by Turkish, Romanian and Bulgarian fighters aircraft until they left the area. In another encounter, NATO said Italian fighter jets intercepted a Russian II-38 maritime patrol aircraft which was already being escorted by Russian fighter jets over the Baltic Sea flying from Kaliningrad. CNN reported Saturday that the US is preparing to carry out a classified war game this summer where a major focus of the scenarios will be how the US should respond to aggressive action and unexpected moves by China and Russia. Tensions with Russia are high, and last week, Secretary of State Antony Blinken called out Russia for "reckless and adversarial actions" at a NATO meeting in Brussels and observed that Moscow has "built up a forces, large scale exercises and acts of intimidation, in the Baltic and Black Sea." "Intercepting multiple groups of Russian aircraft demonstrates NATO forces' readiness and capability to guard Allied skies 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year," Brig. Gen. Andrew Hansen, deputy chief of staff operations at Allied Air Command, said in the NATO statement. NATO aircraft scrambled more than 400 times in 2020 to intercept unknown aircraft according to the alliance. About 90 percent were in response to flights by Russian aircraft. NATO says Russian flights often pose a risk to civilian air traffic over Europe because the Russians often fly without transmitting a transponder code indicating their position and altitude and do not file a flight plan or communicate with air traffic controllers. Error Icon Message blocked Your message to pm@pm.gc.ca has been blocked. See technical details below for more information. Message blocked Your message to art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca has been blocked. See technical details below for more information. Message blocked Your message to wayne.eyre@forces.gc.ca has been blocked. See technical details below for more information. Message blocked Your message to Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca has been blocked. See technical details below for more information. Message blocked Your message to Greta.Bossenmaier@hq.nato.int has been blocked. See technical details below for more information. Message blocked Your message to NIA_IG@navy.mil has been blocked. See technical details below for more information. Message blocked Your message to Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca has been blocked. See technical details below for more information. Message blocked Your message to Jim@conservativewriters.org has been blocked. See technical details below for more information. My message was blocked to everyone else as well Go Figure ---------- Original message ---------- From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 15:41:27 -0400 Subject: Attn LGen Wayne Eyre I just called and tried to explain this email and Federal Court File No T-1557-15 in particular To: wayne.eyre@forces.gc.ca, george.young@forces.gc.ca, Vincent.Rigby@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Shelly.Bruce@cse-cst.gc.ca, daniel.lauzon@international. alexander.steinhouse@justica. anne.dawson@hrsdc-rhdcc.gc.ca, marjorie.michel@tbs-sct.gc.ca, jamie.innes@qpc-cpr.gc.ca, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nt.ca>, premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>, media@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Nathalie Sturgeon <sturgeon.nathalie@ "kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca>, "Richard.Ames" <Richard.Ames@gnb.ca>, "Richard.Bragdon" <Richard.Bragdon@parl.gc.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore" <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "John.Williamson" <John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>, BrianThomasMacdonald <BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail. <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee" <robert.mckee@gnb.ca> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet" <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca> ---------- Original message ---------- From: Art.McDonald@forces.gc.ca Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:08:24 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: YO JONATHAN.VANCE You have been ducKing e since 2015 when I was running iN the election of the 42nd Parliament and suing the Queen in Federal Court Methinks it is YOU who should finally call me back N'esy Pas? To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail. The Acting Chief of the Defence Staff is LGen Wayne Eyre, he may be reached at wayne.eyre@forces.gc.ca. Le Chef d'état-major de la Défense par intérim est le LGen Wayne Eyre. Il peut être rejoint au wayne.eyre@forces.gc.ca. Art McD He/Him // Il/Lui Admiral/amiral Art McDonald Chief of the Defence Staff (CDS) Canadian Armed Forces art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca< Chef d’état-major de la Defense (CÉMD) Forces armées canadiennes art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca< ---------- Original message ---------- From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 13:08:16 -0400 Subject: YO JONATHAN.VANCE You have been ducKing e since 2015 when I was running iN the election of the 42nd Parliament and suing the Queen in Federal Court Methinks it is YOU who should finally call me back N'esy Pas? To: art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca, richard.jolette@forces.gc.ca, JONATHAN.VANCE@forces.gc.ca, Tammy.Harris@forces.gc.ca, Jill.Chisholm@justice.gc.ca, Cedric.Aspirault@forces.gc.ca, Derek.Sloan@parl.gc.ca, Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, clare.barry@justice.gc.ca, elder.marques@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca, dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@ Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc. <andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca> Marwan.Tabbara@parl.gc.ca, Yasmin.Ratansi@parl.gc.ca, Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news-tips <news-tips@nytimes.com>, mcu@justice.gc.ca, ombudsman-communications@ ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: JONATHAN.VANCE@forces.gc.ca Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:01:09 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON STALKER, all the NATO dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Admiral Art McDonald is now the Chief of the Defence Staff, he may be reached at art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca. I will continue to monitor this account periodically until my retirement from the Canadian Armed Forces. Please reach out to EA CDS, LCol Richard Jolette at richard.jolette@forces.gc.ca if you require to get a hold of me. L'amiral Art McDonald est maintenant le Chef d'état-major de la Défense, on peut le joindre au art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca. Je continuerai de surveiller ce compte périodiquement jusqu'à ma retraite des Forces armées canadiennes. Veuillez contacter CdeC CEMD, Lcol Richard Jolette au richard.jolette@forces.gc.ca si vous avez besoin de me contacter. On 3/11/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:35:27 -0400 > Subject: Re: YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON STALKER, all the > NATO dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam > To: Michel.Drapeau@mdlo.ca, "Gilles.Moreau" <Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca> > Cc: mlo-blm@forces.gc.ca, "erin.otoole" <erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca>, > "Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "jagmeet.singh" > <jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, > "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca> > > https://www.cbc.ca/news/ > > > Prosecuting high-ranking officers a 'significant challenge' > > "Retired colonel and lawyer Michel Drapeau, who is a leading expert in > military justice, said he wonders how a court martial could hear a > case involving Vance or McDonald when no one in the military, > including judges, would outrank them." > > PERHAPS I SHOULD SUE THEM EH??? > > On 9/23/19, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >> Byrne Furlong >> Press Secretary >> Office of the Minister of National Defence >> 613-996-3100 >> >> Media Relations >> Department of National Defence >> 613-996-2353 >> mlo-blm@forces.gc.ca >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:14:23 -0300 >> Subject: Fwd: YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON STALKER, all the >> NATO dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam >> To: Michel.Drapeau@mdlo.ca, Walter.Semianiw@mdlo.ca, Newsroom >> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com> >> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com> >> >> Peter Stoffer >> STRATEGIC ADVISOR >> >> (613) 236-2657 x200 >> >> >> >> Mr. Stoffer served as a Member of Parliament for the riding of >> Sackville-Eastern Shore from 1997 to 2015. During 2011-2015, he served >> as the Official Opposition Critic for Veterans Affairs. >> >> During this time, Mr. Stoffer was honoured with a variety of awards >> from the environmental, military, provincial and federal communities. >> He was named Canada’s Parliamentarian of the year 2013, and he >> received the Veterans Ombudsman award. Mr Stoffer has been knighted >> into the Order of St. George and has also been knighted by the King of >> the Netherlands into the Order of Orange Nassau. >> >> He is currently volunteering for a variety of veteran organizations. >> He is also host to a radio show called “Hour of Heroes in Nova Scotia” >> on Community Radio, Radio Station 97-5 CIOE-FM, the Voice of the East >> Coast Music. >> >> >> Colonel-Maître® Michel William Drapeau >> SENIOR COUNSEL >> (613) 236-2657 x200 >> Michel.Drapeau@mdlo.ca >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> >> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 13:43:40 -0300 >> Subject: YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON STALKER, all the NATO >> dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam >> To: JONATHAN.VANCE@forces.gc.ca, "Gilles.Moreau" >> <Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, stalker.mason@hq.nato.int >> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, ombudsman-communications@ >> "Paul.Shuttle" <Paul.Shuttle@pco-bcp.gc.ca> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: MASON.STALKER@forces.gc.ca >> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:38:01 +0000 >> Subject: Automatic reply: [SUSPECTED SPAM / SPAM SUSPECT] A little >> Deja Vu for JONATHAN.VANCE et al >> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com >> >> Good day, >> >> Please note that I do not have regular access to DWAN and your email >> has not been forwarded. >> >> Please forward your email to: stalker.mason@hq.nato.int >> >> Thank you in advance, >> >> MJS >> >> >> On 9/23/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: MASON.STALKER@forces.gc.ca >>> Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 12:04:41 +0000 >>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks its obvious why the Crown would >>> drop the charges after Mark Norman's lawyers hit Trudeau and his buddy >>> Butts with subpoenas N'esy Pas/ >>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com >>> >>> Good day, >>> >>> Please note that I do not have regular access to DWAN and your email >>> has not been forwarded. >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: JONATHAN.VANCE@forces.gc.ca >>> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:26:35 +0000 >>> Subject: Automatic reply: I see that the the evil blogger in Alberta >>> Barry Winters aka Mr Baconfat is still practising libel and hate >>> speech contrary to Sections 300 and 319 0f the Canadian Criminal Code >>> N'esy Pas Mr Prime Minister Trudeau "The Younger" ??? >>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com >>> >>> I will be out of the office until 23 February 2016. I am unable to >>> monitor my e-mail during this time. For urgent matters, please contact >>> my Chief of Staff, BGen Tammy Harris (Tammy.Harris@forces.gc.ca), or >>> my EA, Maj Cedric Aspirault (Cedric.Aspirault@forces.gc.ca >>> whom can contact me. >>> >>> Je serai hors du bureau jusqu'au 23 février 2016. Il ne me sera pas >>> possible de vérifier mes couriels pendant cette période. En cas >>> d'urgence, veuillez contacter ma chef d'état major, Bgén Tammy Harris >>> (Tammy.Harris@forces.gc.ca), ou mon CdC, le maj Cédric Aspirault >>> (Cedric.Aspirault@forces.gc.ca >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: "Chisholm, Jill" <Jill.Chisholm@justice.gc.ca> >>> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:26:34 +0000 >>> Subject: Automatic reply: I see that the the evil blogger in Alberta >>> Barry Winters aka Mr Baconfat is still practising libel and hate >>> speech contrary to Sections 300 and 319 0f the Canadian Criminal Code >>> N'esy Pas Mr Prime Minister Trudeau "The Younger" ??? >>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> >>> >>> Thank you for your message. I will be away from the office until >>> Friday, February 26, 2016 and will not be accessing email frequently >>> during this time. Should you require assistance please contact >>> Jacqueline Fenton at (902) 426-6996. Otherwise I will be pleased to >>> respond to your message upon my return. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada >>> <mcu@justice.gc.ca> >>> Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 16:46:28 +0000 >>> Subject: Automatic reply: YOr Ralph Goodale Methinks this should >>> stress the Integrity of the Globe and Mail and your minions in the >>> RCMP N'esy Pas? >>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >>> >>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of >>> Justice and Attorney General of Canada. >>> Please be assured that your email has been received and will be read >>> with >>> care. >>> However, in light of the federal elections being held on October 21, >>> there may be a delay in processing your email. >>> >>> ______________________________ >>> >>> Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la >>> Justice et procureur général du Canada. >>> Soyez assuré que votre courriel a bien été reçu et que celui-ci sera >>> lu avec soin. >>> Cependant, compte tenu des élections fédérales du 21 octobre prochain, >>> veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le >>> traitement de votre courriel. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Oreiginal message ---------- >>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >>> Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 13:02:10 -0300 >>> Subject: A little Deja Vu for Ralph Goodale and the RCMP before I file >>> my next lawsuit as promised >>> To: Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca, >>> Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, >>> Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, >>> elder.marques@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, >>> Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca, "clare.barry" >>> clare.barry@justice.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca, >>> alaina@alainalockhart.ca, info@ginettepetitpastaylor.ca, >>> oldmaison@yahoo.com, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca, daniel.mchardie@cbc.ca, >>> info@waynelong.ca, matt@mattdecourcey.ca, info@sergecormier.ca, >>> pat@patfinnigan.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, tj@tjharvey.ca, >>> karen.ludwig.nb@gmail.com, votejohnw@gmail.com, >>> PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com >>> postur@fjr.stjr.is, Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca, >>> Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, >>> David.Akin@globalnews.ca, dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, >>> Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Dave.Young@nbeub.ca, jfurey@nbpower.com, >>> jfetzer@d.umn.edu, postur@irr.is, birgittajoy@gmail.com, >>> birgitta@this.is>, Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca, Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca, >>> blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, kris.austin@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca, >>> carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, >>> Michel.Carrier@gnb.ca, Yves.Cote@elections.ca, Greg.Bonnar@gnb.ca >>> Cc: motomaniac333@gmail.com, Newsroom@globeandmail.com, >>> fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@ >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: "Telford, Katie" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca> >>> Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 13:14:20 +0000 >>> Subject: Automatic reply: YO Mr Butts Here are some more comments >>> published within CBC that the RCMP and their boss Ralph Goodale should >>> review ASAP N'esy Pas? >>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >>> >>> Hello, >>> I am out of the office until Tuesday, October 22nd without access to >>> this >>> email. >>> In my absence, you may contact Mike McNair >>> (michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca< >>> Elder Marques >>> (elder.marques@pmo-cpm.gc.ca< >>> Warm regards, >>> Katie >>> ______ >>> Bonjour, >>> Je suis absente du bureau jusqu'au mardi 22 octobre sans accès à mes >>> courriels. >>> Durant mon absence, veuillez communiquer avec Mike McNair >>> (michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca< >>> Elder Marques >>> (elder.marques@pmo-cpm.gc.ca< >>> Cordialement, >>> Katie >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: "Butts, Gerald" <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca> >>> Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 06:33:26 +0000 >>> Subject: Automatic reply: So Much for the Strong Ethics of the Strong >>> Organization commonnly knows as the RCMP/GRC N'esy Pas? >>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >>> >>> Thank you for your email. I am out of the office with limited access >>> to email. For assistance, please email Laura D'Angelo at >>> laura.d'angelo@pmo-cpm.gc.ca. >>> >>> Merci pour votre message. Je suis absent du bureau avec un accèss >>> limité aux courriels. Si vous avez besoin d'assistance, veuillez >>> communiquer avec Laura D'Angelo à l'adresse >>> laura.d'angelo@pmo-cpm.gc.ca >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc. >>> Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 06:30:48 +0000 >>> Subject: Automatic reply: So Much for the Strong Ethics of the Strong >>> Organization commonnly knows as the RCMP/GRC N'esy Pas? >>> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >>> >>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member >>> of Parliament for Vancouver Granville. >>> >>> This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email. >>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there >>> may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your >>> message will be carefully reviewed. >>> >>> To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within >>> the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code. >>> >>> Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of >>> Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the >>> Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future >>> correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write >>> directly to the Department of Justice at >>> mcu@justice.gc.ca<mailto:mcu@ >>> >>> Thank you >>> >>> ------------------- >>> >>> Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de >>> Vancouver Granville. >>> >>> Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre >>> courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de >>> correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de >>> votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement. >>> >>> Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement, >>> veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet, >>> votre adresse et votre code postal. >>> >>> Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de >>> la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la >>> d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du >>> Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la >>> Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ? >>> mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222. >>> >>> Merci >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Original message ---------- >>> From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale (PS/SP)" <Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca> >>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:53:15 +0000 >>> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Emails to Department of Justice and >>> Province of Nova Scotia >>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >>> >>> Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la >>> S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile. >>> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance >>> adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un >>> retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre >>> message sera examin? avec attention. >>> Merci! >>> L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle >>> S?curit? publique Canada >>> ********* >>> >>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of >>> Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness. >>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence >>> addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in >>> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be >>> carefully reviewed. >>> Thank you! >>> Ministerial Correspondence Unit >>> Public Safety Canada >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Original message ---------- >>> From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc. >>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:53:11 +0000 >>> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Emails to Department of Justice and >>> Province of Nova Scotia >>> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >>> >>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member >>> of Parliament for Vancouver Granville. >>> >>> This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email. >>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there >>> may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your >>> message will be carefully reviewed. >>> >>> To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within >>> the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code. >>> >>> Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of >>> Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the >>> Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future >>> correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write >>> directly to the Department of Justice at >>> mcu@justice.gc.ca<mailto:mcu@ >>> >>> Thank you >>> >>> ------------------- >>> >>> Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de >>> Vancouver Granville. >>> >>> Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre >>> courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de >>> correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de >>> votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement. >>> >>> Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement, >>> veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet, >>> votre adresse et votre code postal. >>> >>> Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de >>> la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la >>> d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du >>> Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la >>> Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ? >>> mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222. >>> >>> Merci >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Original message ---------- >>> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" >>> <fin.minfinance-financemin. >>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:53:17 +0000 >>> Subject: RE: Re Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova >>> Scotia >>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >>> >>> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic >>> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your >>> comments. >>> >>> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance >>> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos >>> commentaires. >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Original message ---------- >>> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com> >>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:53:16 +0000 >>> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Emails to Department of Justice and >>> Province of Nova Scotia >>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >>> >>> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail. >>> >>> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical >>> support, please contact our Customer Service department at >>> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail. >>> >>> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to >>> publiceditor@globeandmail.com< >>> >>> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com >>> >>> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and >>> press releases. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Original message ---------- >>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 12:53:03 -0400 >>> Subject: Re Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia >>> To: wrscott@nbpower.com, "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, >>> "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon" >>> <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, krisaustin <krisaustin@peoplesalliance.ca >>> "rick.doucet" <rick.doucet@gnb.ca>, "Sollows, David (ERD/DER)" >>> <david.sollows@gnb.ca>, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, >>> "robert.gauvin" <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca, >>> "Bill.Fraser" <Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca>, "John.Ames" <John.Ames@gnb.ca>, >>> gerry.lowe@gnb.ca, "hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, >>> michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, "art.odonnell" <art.odonnell@nb.aibn.com>, >>> "jake.stewart" <jake.stewart@gnb.ca>, mike.holland@gnb.ca, votejohnw >>> <votejohnw@gmail.com>, andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca, >>> greg.thompson2@gnb.ca, jean-claude.d'amours@gnb.ca, >>> jacques.j.leblanc@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, keith.chiasson@gnb.ca, >>> "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, robert.mckee@gnb.ca, >>> rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy" >>> <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, gphlaw@nb.aibn.com, wharrison >>> <wharrison@nbpower.com>, "Furey, John" <jfurey@nbpower.com>, >>> "Jody.Wilson-Raybould" <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc. >>> "clare.barry" <clare.barry@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, >>> "hon.ralph.goodale" <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, >>> "Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc" <Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca >>> <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, >>> JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca, LauraLee.Langley@novascotia.ca >>> Karen.Hudson@novascotia.ca, Joanne.Munro@novascotia.ca, Newsroom >>> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, news >>> <news@dailygleaner.com> >>> Cc: "David.Raymond.Amos" <David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com> >>> <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Victoria.Zinck@novascotia.ca, >>> Kim.Fleming@novascotia.ca >>> >>> >>> ---------- Original message ---------- >>> From: "McGrath, Stephen T" <Stephen.McGrath@novascotia.ca >>> Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 12:40:22 +0000 >>> Subject: Automatic reply: Does anyone recall the email entitled "So >>> Stephen McGrath if not you then just exactly who sent me this latest >>> email from your office?" >>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> >>> >>> Thanks for your message, however I am no longer at the Department of >>> Justice, and this email account is not being monitored. >>> >>> Please contact Kim Fleming at Kim.Fleming@novascotia.ca (phone >>> 902-424-4023), or Vicky Zinck at Victoria.Zinck@novascotia.ca (phone >>> 902-424-4390). Kim and Vicky will be able to redirect you. >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Original message ---------- >>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca> >>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000 >>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia >>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com> >>> >>> Mr. Amos, >>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of >>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the >>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province >>> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim >>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney >>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will >>> not be responding to further emails on this matter. >>> >>> Department of Justice >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Original message ---------- >>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com >>> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 15:16:38 -0400 >>> Subject: Attn Laura Lee Langley, Karen Hudson and Joanne Munro I just >>> called all three of your offices to inform you of my next lawsuit >>> against Nova Scotia >>> To: LauraLee.Langley@novascotia.ca >>> Joanne.Munro@novascotia.ca >>> Cc: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com >>> >>> https://novascotia.ca/exec_ >>> >>> https://novascotia.ca/exec_ >>> >>> Laura Lee Langley >>> 1700 Granville Street, 5th Floor >>> One Government Place >>> Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 1X5 >>> Phone: (902) 424-8940 >>> Fax: (902) 424-0667 >>> Email: LauraLee.Langley@novascotia.ca >>> >>> https://novascotia.ca/just/ >>> >>> Karen Hudson Q.C. >>> 1690 Hollis Street, 7th Floor >>> Joseph Howe Building >>> Halifax, NS B3J 3J9 >>> Phone: (902) 424-4223 >>> Fax: (902) 424-0510 >>> Email: Karen.Hudson@novascotia.ca >>> >>> https://novascotia.ca/sns/ceo. >>> >>> Joanne Munro: >>> 1505 Barrington Street, 14-South >>> Maritime Centre >>> Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3K5 >>> Phone: (902) 424-4089 >>> Fax: (902) 424-5510 >>> Email: Joanne.Munro@novascotia.ca >>> >>> If you don't wish to speak to me before I begin litigation then I >>> suspect the Integrity Commissioner New Brunswick or the Federal Crown >>> Counsel can explain the email below and the documents hereto attached >>> to you and your Premier etc. >>> >>> Veritas Vincit >>> David Raymond Amos >>> 902 800 0369 >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com >>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400 >>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., >>> To: coi@gnb.ca >>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com >>> >>> Good Day Sir >>> >>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed >>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time >>> >>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who >>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt >>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker >>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document. >>> >>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I >>> suggested that you study closely. >>> >>> This is the docket in Federal Court >>> >>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj. >>> >>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings >>> >>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/ >>> >>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/ >>> >>> April 3rd, 2017 >>> >>> https://archive.org/details/ >>> >>> >>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal >>> >>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj. >>> >>> >>> The only hearing thus far >>> >>> May 24th, 2017 >>> >>> https://archive.org/details/ >>> >>> >>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity >>> >>> Date: 20151223 >>> >>> Docket: T-1557-15 >>> >>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015 >>> >>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell >>> >>> BETWEEN: >>> >>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS >>> >>> Plaintiff >>> >>> and >>> >>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN >>> >>> Defendant >>> >>> ORDER >>> >>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on >>> December 14, 2015) >>> >>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to >>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November >>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim >>> in its entirety. >>> >>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a >>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then >>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian >>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg, >>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter >>> he stated: >>> >>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the >>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you. >>> You are your brother’s keeper. >>> >>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former >>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to >>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of >>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses >>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to >>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime >>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former >>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of >>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore; >>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former >>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff >>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court >>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired >>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted >>> Police. >>> >>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my >>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many >>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am >>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I >>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in >>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al, >>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding >>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has >>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so. >>> >>> >>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of >>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There >>> is no order as to costs. >>> >>> “B. Richard Bell” >>> Judge >>> >>> >>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment >>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent >>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006. >>> >>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court >>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the >>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my >>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada? >>> >>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the >>> most >>> >>> http://davidraymondamos3. >>> >>> 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war >>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to >>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over >>> five years after he began his bragging: >>> >>> January 13, 2015 >>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate >>> >>> December 8, 2014 >>> Why Canada Stood Tall! >>> >>> Friday, October 3, 2014 >>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And >>> Stupid Justin Trudeau? >>> >>> >>> Vertias Vincit >>> David Raymond Amos >>> 902 800 0369 >>> >>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of >>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have >>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical. >>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me. >>> >>> Subject: >>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400 >>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca >>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com >>> >>> January 30, 2007 >>> >>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE >>> >>> Mr. David Amos >>> >>> Dear Mr. Amos: >>> >>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29, >>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP. >>> >>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have >>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve >>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton. >>> >>> Sincerely, >>> >>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy >>> Minister of Health >>> >>> CM/cb >>> >>> >>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote: >>> >>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500 >>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca, >>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net, >>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com >>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John. >>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, >>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has >>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not >>> >>> Dear Mr. Amos, >>> >>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off >>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I >>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns. >>> >>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position >>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process >>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the >>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these >>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this >>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done. >>> >>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false >>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear >>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada >>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment >>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB. >>> >>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on >>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors. >>> >>> Sincerely, >>> >>> Warren McBeath, Cpl. >>> GRC Caledonia RCMP >>> Traffic Services NCO >>> Ph: (506) 387-2222 >>> Fax: (506) 387-4622 >>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >>> >>> >>> http://www.archive.org/ >>> >>> http://www.archive.org/ >>> >>> >>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006 >>> Senator Arlen Specter >>> United States Senate >>> Committee on the Judiciary >>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building >>> Washington, DC 20510 >>> >>> Dear Mr. Specter: >>> >>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man >>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters >>> raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that >>> these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in >>> contact >>> with you about this previously. >>> >>> Very truly yours, >>> Barry A. Bachrach >>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403 >>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003 >>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com >>> >>> >>> >>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., >>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner >>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street >>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1 >>> tel.: 506-457-7890 >>> fax: 506-444-5224 >>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca >>> >>> Hon. Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C. >>> Integrity Commissioner >>> >>> Hon. Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., who resides in Bathurst, N.B., is a >>> native of Kedgwick, N.B., and is married to Huguette (Savoie) >>> Deschênes. They have two sons. >>> >>> He studied at Saint-Joseph University (now Université de Moncton) from >>> 1960 to 1962, University of Ottawa from 1962-1965 (B.A.), and >>> University of New Brunswick (LL.B., 1968). He was admitted to the Law >>> Society of New Brunswick in 1968. He was legal counsel to the >>> Department of Justice in Fredericton from 1968 to 1971. He was in >>> private practice from 1972 to 1982 and specialized in civil litigation >>> as a partner in the law firm of Michaud, Leblanc, Robichaud, and >>> Deschênes. While residing in Shediac, N.B., he served on town council >>> and became the first president of the South East Economic Commission. >>> He is a past president of the Richelieu Club in Shediac. >>> >>> In 1982, he was appointed a judge of the Court of Queen’s Bench of New >>> Brunswick and of the Court of Appeal of New Brunswick in 2000. >>> >>> On July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the Court Martial Appeal Court of >>> Canada. >>> >>> While on the Court of Appeal of New Brunswick, he was appointed >>> President of the provincial Judicial Council and in 2012 Chairperson >>> of the Federal Electoral Boundaries Commission for the Province of New >>> Brunswick for the 2015 federal election. >>> >>> He was appointed Conflict of Interest Commissioner in December 2016 >>> and became New Brunswick’s first Integrity Commissioner on December >>> 16, 2016 with responsibilities for conflict of interest issues related >>> to Members of the Legislative Assembly. As of April 1, 2017 he >>> supervises lobbyists of public office holders under the Lobbyists’ >>> Registration Act. >>> >>> As of September 1, 2017, he will be assuming the functions presently >>> held by the Access to Information and Privacy Commissioner. >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Original message ---------- >>> From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is> >>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:05:47 +0000 >>> Subject: Re: Hey Premier Gallant please inform the questionable >>> parliamentarian Birigtta Jonsdottir that although NB is a small "Have >>> Not" province at least we have twice the population of Iceland and >>> that not all of us are as dumb as she and her Prime Minister pretends >>> to be.. >>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> >>> >>> >>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received >>> >>> Kveðja / Best regards >>> Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office >>> >>> >>> ---------- Original message ---------- >>> From: Póstur IRR <postur@irr.is> >>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:05:47 +0000 >>> Subject: Re: Hey Premier Gallant please inform the questionable >>> parliamentarian Birigtta Jonsdottir that although NB is a small "Have >>> Not" province at least we have twice the population of Iceland and >>> that not all of us are as dumb as she and her Prime Minister pretends >>> to be.. >>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> >>> >>> >>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received. >>> >>> Kveðja / Best regards >>> Innanríkisráðuneytið / Ministry of the Interior >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)" <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca> >>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 21:39:17 +0000 >>> Subject: RE: After crossing paths with them bigtime in 2004 Davey Baby >>> Coon and his many Green Meanie and Fake Left cohorts know why I won't >>> hold my breath waiting for them to act with any semblance of integrity >>> now N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc?? >>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> >>> >>> Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. >>> Please be assured that your email has been received, will be reviewed, >>> and a response will be forthcoming. >>> Once again, thank you for taking the time to write. >>> >>> Merci d'avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du Nouveau-Brunswick. >>> Soyez assuré que votre courriel a bien été reçu, qu'il sera examiné >>> et qu'une réponse vous sera acheminée. >>> Merci encore d'avoir pris de temps de nous écrire. >>> >>> Sincerely, / Sincèrement, >>> Mallory Fowler >>> Corespondence Manager / Gestionnaire de la correspondance >>> Office of the Premier / Cabinet du premier ministre >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is> >>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 21:43:50 +0000 >>> Subject: Re: After crossing paths with them bigtime in 2004 Davey Baby >>> Coon and his many Green Meanie and Fake Left cohorts know why I won't >>> hold my breath waiting for them to act with any semblance of integrity >>> now N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc?? >>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> >>> >>> >>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received >>> >>> Kveðja / Best regards >>> Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Póstur IRR <postur@irr.is> >>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 21:43:50 +0000 >>> Subject: Re: After crossing paths with them bigtime in 2004 Davey Baby >>> Coon and his many Green Meanie and Fake Left cohorts know why I won't >>> hold my breath waiting for them to act with any semblance of integrity >>> now N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc?? >>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> >>> >>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received. >>> >>> Kveðja / Best regards >>> Innanríkisráðuneytið / Ministry of the Interior >>> >>> >>> For the public record I knew Birgitta was no better than the people >>> she bitches about when she refused to discuss the QSLS blog with me >>> while she was in Canada making her rounds in the Canadain media in >>> January of 2011. >>> >>> >>> This is the docket >>> >>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj. >>> >>> These are digital recordings of the last two hearings >>> >>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/ >>> >>> Jan 11th https://archive.org/details/ >>> >>> This me running for a seat in Parliament again while CBC denies it again >>> >>> Fundy Royal, New Brunswick Debate – Federal Elections 2015 - The Local >>> Campaign, Rogers TV >>> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch? >>> >>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ >>> >>> Veritas Vincit >>> David Raymond Amos >>> 902 800 0369 >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> >>> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:20:29 -0400 >>> Subject: Hey before you Red Coats swear an Oath to the Queen and the >>> 42nd Parliament begins perhaps the turncoat Big Bad Billy Casey the >>> Yankee carpetbagger David Lutz or some Boyz from NB should explain >>> this lawsuit to you real slow. >>> To: alaina@alainalockhart.ca, david <david@lutz.nb.ca>, >>> "daniel.mchardie" <daniel.mchardie@cbc.ca>, info@waynelong.ca, >>> info@ginettepetitpastaylor.ca, rarseno@nbnet.nb.ca, >>> matt@mattdecourcey.ca, info@sergecormier.ca, pat@patfinnigan.ca, >>> tj@tjharvey.ca, karen.ludwig.nb@gmail.com >>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >>> <Frank.McKenna@td.com>, info@votezsteve.ca, info@billcasey.ca, >>> "justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca> >>> "dominic.leblanc.a1" <dominic.leblanc.a1@parl.gc.ca >>> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, jacques_poitras <jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>, >>> "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "peter.mackay" >>> <peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca> >>> >>> >>> >>> FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the >>> most >>> >>> >>> http://davidraymondamos3. >>> >>> 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war >>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to >>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over >>> five years after he began his bragging: >>> >>> January 13, 2015 >>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate >>> >>> December 8, 2014 >>> Why Canada Stood Tall! >>> >>> Friday, October 3, 2014 >>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And >>> Stupid Justin Trudeau >>> >>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide >>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts. >>> >>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien >>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign >>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to >>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were >>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were >>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth >>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for >>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute” >>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind. >>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not >>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a >>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to >>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was >>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But >>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s >>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s >>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic, >>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle >>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway >>> campaign of 2006. >>> >>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then >>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the >>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent, >>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament. >>> >>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling >>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of >>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners >>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a >>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make. >>> >>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have >>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war. >>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by >>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is >>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of >>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government >>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this >>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a >>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East. >>> >>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror >>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state” >>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control, >>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The >>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and >>> essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An >>> ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear >>> and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,” >>> or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of >>> terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states >>> “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of >>> Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an >>> ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the >>> Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan. >>> >>> One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty >>> was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the >>> amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time >>> denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time >>> self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of >>> “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the >>> G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious >>> behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister >>> Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully >>> cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits >>> are not. >>> >>> Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal >>> mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the >>> world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy” >>> David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security >>> and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can >>> and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing >>> “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war >>> criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending >>> tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.” >>> >>> In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau >>> “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and >>> successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing, >>> marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian >>> military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern >>> equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are >>> antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five >>> years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that >>> won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer. >>> >>> My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My >>> Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin >>> Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not >>> served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social >>> democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and >>> other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet >>> these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to >>> other nations, and then criticize them for doing so. >>> >>> Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security, >>> and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before >>> shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world. >>> >>> Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now >>> >>> From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca >>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400 >>> Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and >>> the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still >>> alive >>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com >>> >>> This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received >>> your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply >>> to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement. >>> >>> >>> ---------- Original message ---------- >>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300 >>> Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the >>> War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive >>> To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil, >>> Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc. >>> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >>> dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca, >>> milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca, >>> sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari >>> <smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, >>> susan@blueskystrategygroup.com >>> eugene@blueskystrategygroup. >>> Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice" <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin" >>> <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower >>> <whistleblower@ctv.ca> >>> >>> I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David >>> Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's >>> Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on >>> CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To >>> be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested >>> that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise >>> if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else >>> about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact that your >>> old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English >>> never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is >>> interesting though >>> >>> http://www. >>> >>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/ >>> >>> Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read >>> this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about >>> Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad >>> Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me. >>> >>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/ >>> >>> The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a >>> shy political animal >>> >>> Veritas Vincit >>> David Raymond Amos >>> 902 800 0369 >>> >>> Enjoy Mr Weston >>> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/ >>> >>> "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military >>> brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he >>> says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping >>> to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command, >>> including a Canadian general. >>> >>> That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff, >>> who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000 >>> U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was >>> also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped >>> prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait." >>> >>> http://baconfat53.blogspot. >>> >>> "I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there >>> being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends" >>> demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American >>> "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying >>> into the US policy. >>> >>> At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my >>> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning >>> in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would >>> report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was >>> never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there >>> were deployed WMD. >>> >>> Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and >>> invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were >>> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation >>> (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned >>> about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at >>> that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil >>> authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy. >>> >>> There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to >>> its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary >>> to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that >>> folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated >>> upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions >>> are to met before US troop can redeploy? Prime Minister Jean Chretien >>> and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of >>> Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them >>> correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the >>> George W Bush administration was onerous >>> >>> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian >>> military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian >>> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations >>> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan >>> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi >>> operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian >>> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which >>> ....not necessarily in that order. " >>> >>> You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John >>> Adams? of the CSE within the DND? >>> >>> http://www.socom.mil/ >>> >> > | |
Conversation
Post
Conversation
