From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 2:01 PM
To: jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, Michael.Kowalchuk@cas-satj.gc.
dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, craig.callens@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Charmaine.Bulger@rcmp-grc.gc.
Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca,
maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca,
Gerald.Butts@@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, pm@parl.gc.ca,
Cc: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com;
bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca; david@lutz.nb.ca, david.eidt@gnb.ca,
david.hansen@justice.gc.ca
Subject: ATTN Jan Jensen I obviously acknowledge the CROWN'S emails Perhaps
it should learn to acknowledge mine EH?
The recording of the hearing was forwarded to many members of the RCMP
and many other people byway of an mp3 file attached to this email
If anyone cares they can listen to the hearing right here
https://archive.org/details/
Nearly one month later one officer of the RCMP responds with a
computer generated annoucement that she is retiring. Well at least her
computer piad for by the taxpayer is ethical enough to affirm to me
that all the other memebers of the RCMP got my emails as well N'esy
pas? The RCMP is well aware that while I was in Alberta in 2014 I had
a long talk with this woman and her boss Marianne.Ryan about the
malice of politticians and the RCMP. I also sent them many emails
pointing to what 3 stooges in Aberta Barry Winters Dean Roger Ray and
Patrick Doran were publishing on the Internet about politcians, the
RCMP, many other cops and most importantly my family and I. In return
the RCMP harrassed me on behalf of the legislative Assmebly of
Alberta. That was the straw that broke the camels back that caused me
to return to the Maritimes in 2015 and run for public office again
while arguing this lawsuit with the CROWN. Everybody and his dog knows
it.
-----Original Message-----
From: Charmaine BULGER Charmaine.Bulger@rcmp-grc.gc.
Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2017 5:11 PM
To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Two voicemails and an email for the Minister of Justice
Kathleen Ganley, her friends in the Assembly, the CPS, the EPS and RCMP to
review before May 24th
I am no longer working in ALERT and will be on retirement leave. Please
contact Insp. Chad Coles via groupwise or at 780-509-3056. Thank-you.
Charmaine
---------- Oriignal message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 15:52:06 -0400
Subject: Re: Direction of the Federal Court (T-1557-15) David Raymond
Amos v. Her Majesty The Queen
To: "jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, Michael.Kowalchuk@cas-satj.gc.
bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Cc: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
I am in receipt of both of your emails.
So has anyone from the RCMP talked to your people yet?
Cc: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com;
bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca; david@lutz.nb.ca, david.eidt@gnb.ca,
david.hansen@justice.gc.ca
Subject: ATTN Jan Jensen I obviously acknowledge the CROWN'S emails Perhaps
it should learn to acknowledge mine EH?
The recording of the hearing was forwarded to many members of the RCMP
and many other people byway of an mp3 file attached to this email
If anyone cares they can listen to the hearing right here
https://archive.org/details/
Nearly one month later one officer of the RCMP responds with a
computer generated annoucement that she is retiring. Well at least her
computer piad for by the taxpayer is ethical enough to affirm to me
that all the other memebers of the RCMP got my emails as well N'esy
pas? The RCMP is well aware that while I was in Alberta in 2014 I had
a long talk with this woman and her boss Marianne.Ryan about the
malice of politticians and the RCMP. I also sent them many emails
pointing to what 3 stooges in Aberta Barry Winters Dean Roger Ray and
Patrick Doran were publishing on the Internet about politcians, the
RCMP, many other cops and most importantly my family and I. In return
the RCMP harrassed me on behalf of the legislative Assmebly of
Alberta. That was the straw that broke the camels back that caused me
to return to the Maritimes in 2015 and run for public office again
while arguing this lawsuit with the CROWN. Everybody and his dog knows
it.
-----Original Message-----
From: Charmaine BULGER Charmaine.Bulger@rcmp-grc.gc.
Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2017 5:11 PM
To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Two voicemails and an email for the Minister of Justice
Kathleen Ganley, her friends in the Assembly, the CPS, the EPS and RCMP to
review before May 24th
I am no longer working in ALERT and will be on retirement leave. Please
contact Insp. Chad Coles via groupwise or at 780-509-3056. Thank-you.
Charmaine
---------- Oriignal message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 15:52:06 -0400
Subject: Re: Direction of the Federal Court (T-1557-15) David Raymond
Amos v. Her Majesty The Queen
To: "jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, Michael.Kowalchuk@cas-satj.gc.
bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Cc: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
I am in receipt of both of your emails.
So has anyone from the RCMP talked to your people yet?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Jensen, Jan" jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 19:31:21 +0000
Subject: RE: Direction of the Federal Court (T-1557-15) David Raymond
Amos v. Her Majesty The Queen
To: "Kowalchuk, Michael" Michael.Kowalchuk@cas-satj.gc.ca,
motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you; I have received the email with attached direction from the Court.
Regards
Jan L Jensen
Counsel
Department of Justice Canada | Ministère de la Justice Canada
Atlantic Regional Office | Bureau régional de l'Atlantique
Suite 1400, Duke Tower | pièce 1400, tour Duke
5251 Duke Street | 5251 rue Duke
Halifax, Nova Scotia | Halifax, Nouvelle Écosse B3J 1P3
jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca
tel | tél : 902.426.8177
fax | téléc : 902.426.2329
Government of Canada | Gouvernement du Canada
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Kowalchuk, Michael [mailto:Michael.Kowalchuk@cas-satj.gc.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 4:29 PM
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com; Jensen, Jan
Subject: Direction of the Federal Court (T-1557-15) David Raymond Amos
v. Her Majesty The Queen
Good afternoon,
Please find attached a Direction of the Court dated April 4, 2017 on
the above-noted matter (Note: A copy has also been sent via
facsimile).
Please acknowledge receipt of this Direction at your earliest convenience.
Thank you,
Michael Kowalchuk
Registry Officer | Agent du greffe
Federal Court | Cour fédérale
1720 - 1801 Hollis Street
Halifax, NS B3J 3N4
Telephone | Téléphone 902-426-3282
Facsimile | Télécopieur 902-426-5514
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)" Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 16:53:28 +0000
Subject: RE: Yo Chucky Leblanc I had quite a hoedown about Yankee
wiretap tapes of the MOB in Federal Court yesterday with Harper's
favourite constitutional lawyer who is now a Judge with the same last
name as you Please enjoy
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be
assured that your email will be reviewed.
Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 12:52:57 -0400
Subject: Yo Chucky Leblanc I had quite a hoedown about Yankee wiretap
tapes of the MOB in Federal Court yesterday with Harper's favourite
constitutional lawyer who is now a Judge with the same last name as
you Please enjoy
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, patrick_doran1@hotmail.com, sunrayzulu@shaw.ca, eps@edmontonpolice.ca, cps@calgarypolice.ca, bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca, brian@brianruhe.ca,
radical@radicalpress.com, paul@paulfromm.com, sfine@globeandmail.com,news@kingscorecord.com, peacock.kurt@telegraphjournal.com, macpherson.don@dailygleaner.com, nmoore@bellmedia.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca, CRAIG.DALTON@gnb.ca, Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Paul.Collister@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, premier@gnb.ca, serge.rousselle@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, blaine.higgs@gnb.ca,
Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, mike.obrienfred@gmail.com, leanne.murray@mcinnescooper.com, leader@greenparty.ca, postur@for.is, postur@irr.is, birgittaj@althingi.is, jody.carr@gnb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca,
Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca, marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca,
Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca
Cc: oldmaison@yahoo.com, sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca, andre@jafaust.com, john.gamblin@bellaliant.net, cmunroe@glgmlaw.com,
Liberal / Assistance nbd_cna@liberal.ca, Michael.Wernick@pco-bcp.gc.ca, James.Comey@ic.fbi.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov
Perhaps you and your activist pal Andre Faust should have a long talk
with all your politcal buddies including the strange turncoats ASAP?
After all your barring from you beloved "Old Maison" is also mentioned
within my lawsuit N'esy Pas Chucky "Cry Baby" Leblanc?
Published on Apr 2, 2017
Dominic Cardy is the new Chief of Staff of the New Brunswick P.C. Party!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VxoIR7pB6JU
Methinks this is the reason why.
Fat Fred City Circle Jerk
Published on May 29, 2016
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQEr_ygDYy4
Judge-moving bill aims to help Dominic LeBlanc, Tory MLA charges
Kirk MacDonald says Liberals drafted bill to help put Jolène Richard
and André Richard on court
By Jacques Poitras, CBC News Posted: Nov 24, 2016 6:03 PM AT
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/kirk-macdonald-dominic-leblanc-judge-moving-bill-1.3866450
DOMINIC CARDY
Director Strategic Issues (Office of the Official Opposition)
Legislative Assembly
Phone : (506) 453-7494
Fax : (506) 453-3461
Email : Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca
Furthermore you and at least one of your other wannabe lawyer activist
buddies Mark Darcy cannot claim that you did not know about my lawsuit
six weeks before I met Justice Richard Bell, Leanne Murray's former
law firm partner in Federal Court one block down the street from you
in Fat Fred City in 2015 N'esy Pas?
Me versus Chucky Leblanc and the Fake Left etc
Published on Nov 6, 2015
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icdihncTPLQ
That said I must continue say that you crooked little Bay of Fundy
Frogs (some with Scottish genes) do get around EH? (That is what you
and Abel Leblanc call yourselves N'esy Pas?)
Tell Dominic Leblanc to say hey to one of your cousins and his other
crooke pals on the bench i Fedal Court for me will ya?
'Potential misconduct' probe launched into judges after CBC revelations
Tax court justice seen on video attending KPMG-linked party
By Harvey Cashore, Kimberly Ivany, Nicole McCormick, Gillian Findlay,
CBC News Posted: Mar 07, 2017 6:23 PM ET
http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/judges-probe-potential-misconduct-1.4013170
The Honourable René Leblanc,
The Honourable René Leblanc, was a lawyer with the Department of
Justice Canada in Ottawa, and was appointed a Judge of the Federal
Court on April 11, 2014.
Mr. Justice LeBlanc received a Bachelor of Civil Law from Université
Laval in 1979 and was called to the Barreau du Québec in 1980. He
worked in private practice with the law firm of Lazarovitch, Cannon,
Lemelin & Rourke in Québec City before joining the Legal Services Unit
of the Secretary of State of Canada in 1982. In 1986, he joined the
Department of Justice Canada as a litigator and was appointed Senior
General Counsel in 2006. In that capacity he appeared before all
levels of court.
During his time with the Department of Justice he was designated as
one of a small group of lawyers to represent the Attorney General of
Canada before the Supreme Court of Canada. He was also a member of the
national committee responsible for reviewing all aspects of litigation
before the Supreme Court of Canada involving the government of Canada.
His main area of practice was civil litigation and constitutional law.
Justice LeBlanc has been a frequent conference speaker to his
colleagues at the Department of Justice and has served as a part-time
professor at the University of Ottawa, Faculty of Civil Law. He is
also co-author of a book on the recourses and procedure before the
Federal Courts (Letarte, Veilleux, LeBlanc et Rouillard-Labbé, Recours
et procédure devant les Cours fédérales, Montréal, LexisNexis Canada
Inc., 2013). This book was published in 2013 and is the only
publication in the French language dealing with that subject matter.
http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/F-7/FullText.html
Constitutional questions
57 (1) If the constitutional validity, applicability or operability of
an Act of Parliament or of the legislature of a province, or of
regulations made under such an Act, is in question before the Federal
Court of Appeal or the Federal Court or a federal board, commission or
other tribunal, other than a service tribunal within the meaning of
the National Defence Act, the Act or regulation shall not be judged to
be invalid, inapplicable or inoperable unless notice has been served
on the Attorney General of Canada and the attorney general of each
province in accordance with subsection (2).
Marginal note:Time of notice
(2) The notice must be served at least 10 days before the day on which
the constitutional question is to be argued, unless the Federal Court
of Appeal or the Federal Court or the federal board, commission or
other tribunal, as the case may be, orders otherwise.
Marginal note:Notice of appeal or application for judicial review
(3) The Attorney General of Canada and the attorney general of each
province are entitled to notice of any appeal or application for
judicial review made in respect of the constitutional question.
Marginal note:Right to be heard
(4) The Attorney General of Canada and the attorney general of each
province are entitled to adduce evidence and make submissions to the
Federal Court of Appeal or the Federal Court or the federal board,
commission or other tribunal, as the case may be, in respect of the
constitutional question.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/supreme-court-justices-express-skepticism-about-harpers-latest-appointment/article16342404/
A skeptical Supreme Court weighs the future of Harper’s controversial
appointment
Sean Fine - Justice Writer The Globe and Mail
Published Wednesday, Jan. 15, 2014 11:44AM EST
Justice Richard Wagner of Quebec persistently challenged the Canadian
government on its arguments about sentence structure in the law that
he appeared to see as narrow and legalistic. “Don’t you think the more
fundamental issue is to go behind the intent, behind the compromise”
that was made in the act to ensure the Supreme Court has an adequate
number of judges who are experts on Quebec’s civil code, he asked.
He wasn’t alone. “Where is the evidence that Parliament intended to
treat all judges the same way?” Justice Rosalie Abella asked
government lawyer René LeBlanc.
When Mr. LeBlanc said the evidence lay in Parliament’s 1875 debates,
which created the Supreme Court long before the Federal Court existed,
Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin asked why the government had not made
the law clearer subsequently.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Lefebvre, Monique" Monique.Lefebvre@justice.gc.ca
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 20:24:22 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Attorney General Jody.Wilson-Raybould
RE Your Mindless Minion Jan Jensen and his very corrupt buddy Justice
Rene leblanc
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
I will be away from the office Monday, April 3, 2017. Please contact
Tanya Dunn at (902) 426-8215 or by email at Tanya.Dunn@justice.gc.ca
if you require assistance. Thank you.
Je serais absente du bureau lundi, le 3 avril 2017. Veuillez
contacter Tanya Dunn au (902) 426-8215 ou par courriel,
Tanya.Dunn@justice.gc.ca pour assistance. Merci.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Chisholm, Jill" Jill.Chisholm@justice.gc.ca
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 20:24:23 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Attorney General Jody.Wilson-Raybould
RE Your Mindless Minion Jan Jensen and his very corrupt buddy Justice
Rene leblanc
To: David Amos
Thank you for your message. I am currently away from the office for an
extended period of time and am not monitoring this email account.
Should you require assistance please contact Jacqueline Fenton at
(902) 426-6996.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 16:24:17 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Attn Attorney General Jody.Wilson-Raybould RE Your
Mindless Minion Jan Jensen and his very corrupt buddy Justice Rene
leblanc
To: monique.lefebvre@justice.gc.ca, Ginette.Mazerolle@justice.gc.ca,
mcu@justice.gc.ca, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca,
jill.chisholm@justice.gc.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Michael.Wernick@pco-bcp.gc.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 20:20:08 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Attorney General Jody.Wilson-Raybould
RE Your Mindless Minion Jan Jensen and his very corrupt buddy Justice
Rene leblanc
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
I will be away from the office March 1, 2017 until June 5, 2017.
Please contact Monique Lefebvre at (902) 426-5804 or by email,
monique.lefebvre@justice.gc.ca, for assistance. Ginette Mazerolle
will be acting in my absence.
Je serais absent du bureau le 1 mars 2017 jusqu'au 5 juin 2017.
Veuillez contacter Monique Lefebvre au (902) 426-5804 ou par courriel,
monique.lefebvre@justice.gc.ca, pour assistance. Ginette Mazerolle
agira de façon intérimaire pendant mon absence.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: NATALIA OLIVEIRA JOHNSTON natalia.johnston@cbc.ca
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 13:20:09 -0700
Subject: Out of office Re: Attn Attorney General Jody.Wilson-Raybould
RE Your Mindless Minion Jan Jensen and his very corrupt buddy Justice
Rene leblanc
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Please note that I'm currently out of office and will return on
Tuesday, April 4.
If your matter is urgent, please contact the reception line at 416-205-3216.
--
*Natalia Johnston*
Legal Assistant
to Dustin Milligan, Katarina Germani and Azim Remani
Tel. (416) 205-2306
Fax (416) 205-2723
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 16:19:58 -0400
Subject: Attn Attorney General Jody.Wilson-Raybould RE Your Mindless
Minion Jan Jensen and his very corrupt buddy Justice Rene leblanc
To: JAG.Minister@gov.bc.ca, suzanne.anton.mla@leg.bc.ca,
ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca, Kathleen.Ganley@assembly.ab.ca,
jus.minister@gov.sk.ca, g.wyant.mla@sasktel.net, minjus@leg.gov.mb.ca,
tuxconst@mymts.net, attorneygeneral@ontario.ca,
ynaqvi.mpp@liberal.ola.org, ministre@justice.gouv.qc.ca,
svallee-gati@assnat.qc.ca, justice.comments@gnb.ca,
etmitchell@gov.pe.ca, sthorne@gov.pe.ca, premier@gov.pe.ca,
JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca, dianawhalen@gmail.com, justice@gov.nl.ca,
andrewparsons@gov.nl.ca, justice@gov.yk.ca, Tracy.McPhee@gov.yk.ca,
Louis_Sebert@gov.nt.ca, justice@gov.nu.ca, kpeterson@gov.nu.ca,
david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com,
Marc.Litt@bakermckenzie.com, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov,
James.Comey@ic.fbi.gov, bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, sfine@globeandmail.com
Cc: mcu@justice.gc.ca, Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, david.hansen@justice.gc.ca, Andrew.Baumberg@cas-satj.gc.ca, andrew.baumberg@fct-cf.gc.ca, postur@for.is,
Michael.Kowalchuk@cas-satj.gc.ca, bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca, premier@gnb.ca,
brian.gallant@gnb.ca, hance.colburne@cbc.ca, ht.lacroix@cbc.ca,
hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca, postur@irr.is, birgittaj@althingi.is, marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca, Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca
I just encountered Harper's and MacKay's favourite lawyer/judge and
your mindless minion Jan Jensen in Federal Court and Justice Rene
Leblanc was truly nasty .Now look out for another lawsuit about the
CROWN'S coverup wiretap tapes of the MOB.
LIEbranos and the CBC should remember this debate N'esy Pas Petey Baby
MacKay?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyNx6QEHqRA
Or this talk show
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgTsmzbasCA&t=317s
You lawyers and cops can bet dimes to dollars that if any of the
crooked judges i have crossed paths with in the Federal Court of
Appeal dismiss my complaint after we celebrate the Quees'd birthday
this year trust that I will put the matter before Lelbanc's friends in
the Supreme Court in a heartbeat. Obviously you have my word on it
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
Enjoy reviewing the rest of this email.Mr Jenson
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/supreme-court-justices-express-skepticism-about-harpers-latest-appointment/article16342404/
A skeptical Supreme Court weighs the future of Harper’s controversial
appointment
Sean Fine - Justice Writer The Globe and Mail
Published Wednesday, Jan. 15, 2014 11:44AM EST
Justice Richard Wagner of Quebec persistently challenged the Canadian
government on its arguments about sentence structure in the law that
he appeared to see as narrow and legalistic. “Don’t you think the more
fundamental issue is to go behind the intent, behind the compromise”
that was made in the act to ensure the Supreme Court has an adequate
number of judges who are experts on Quebec’s civil code, he asked.
He wasn’t alone. “Where is the evidence that Parliament intended to
treat all judges the same way?” Justice Rosalie Abella asked
government lawyer René LeBlanc.
When Mr. LeBlanc said the evidence lay in Parliament’s 1875 debates,
which created the Supreme Court long before the Federal Court existed,
Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin asked why the government had not made
the law clearer subsequently.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Andrew.Baumberg@cas-satj.gc.ca
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 12:00:42 -0400
Subject: FW: Attn Andrew Baumberg and William Brooks Commissioner for
Federal Judicial Affairs RE Federal Court File no T-1557-15
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, "Baumberg, Andrew"
Good afternoon Mr. Amos
In response to your recent e-mail, please note:
· I called you on Tuesday morning because you called and left
a voice mail for me on Monday. (I did not call you back right away on
Monday because I was at home helping to look after my daughter, who
came down with chickenpox over the week-end.)
· I am not aware of anyone checking your work on the internet
last Friday.
· I do not know who sent you an anonymous e-mail on Friday.
· I have not contacted the RCMP in this regard.
· I admit that I did not read your email and all its
attachments closely.
· I “presumed” that you “wanted to talk about electronic
filing” during our call yesterday because (a) that is what you
indicated in your voice mail on Monday that you wanted to talk about
(in your voice-mail message of Monday, March 21, you say: “I want to
discuss what I have been researching about electronic filing, and I
see your name in these documents”), and (b) that is what you were
actually talking about on the call yesterday.
· I do not deny my knowledge of your assertion that there is
evidence of your possession of police surveillance wiretap tapes filed
in the Public Record of Federal Court.
Best regards, Andrew
Andrew Baumberg
Legal Counsel / Conseiller juridique
Federal Court / Cour fédérale
(613) 947-3177
andrew.baumberg@fct-cf.gc.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2017 16:07:21 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE The FEDS, CBC, the "Activists" and
everybody in Chucky Leblanc's beloved Old Maison played dumb on April
Fools Day just like they did 11 years very long years N;esy Pas Andre
Faust?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
of Parliament for Vancouver Granville and Minister of Justice and
Attorney General of Canada.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
addressed to the Hon. Jody Wilson-Raybould, please note that there may
be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your message
will be carefully reviewed.
-------------------
Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e pour
Vancouver Granville et ministre de la justice et procureur g?n?ral du
Canada.
En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
adress?e ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, veuillez prendre note
qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel.
Nous tenons ? vous assurer que votre message sera lu avec soin.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)" Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2017 16:07:34 +0000
Subject: RE: RE The FEDS, CBC, the "Activists" and everybody in Chucky
Leblanc's beloved Old Maison played dumb on April Fools Day just like
they did 11 years very long years N;esy Pas Andre Faust?
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be
assured that your email will be reviewed.
Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Kowalchuk, Michael" Michael.Kowalchuk@cas-satj.gc.ca
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 20:36:06 +0000
Subject: Direction of the Federal Court (T-1557-15) David Raymond Amos
v. Her Majesty The Queen
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca
Good afternoon,
Please find attached a Direction of the Court dated March 31, 2017 on
the above-noted matter (copy has also been sent via facsimile).
(Note: if you are unavailable for the teleconference scheduled for
Monday April 3, 2017, please provide me with alternative times that
you are available between Monday April 3, 2017 and Thursday, April 6,
2017)
Please acknowledge receipt of this Direction at your earliest
convenience and please provide me with a direct telephone number for
me to reach you for the teleconference.
Thank you,
Michael Kowalchuk
Registry Officer | Agent du greffe
Federal Court | Cour fédérale
1720 - 1801 Hollis Street
Halifax, NS B3J 3N4
Telephone | Téléphone 902-426-3282
Facsimile | Télécopieur 902-426-5514
Sunday, 2 April 2017
NOTICE MOTION FOR AN ORAL HEARING FEDERAL COURT File No. T-1557-15
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/04/notice-motion-for-oral-hearing-federal.html
Court File No. T-1557-15
FEDERAL COURT
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Plaintiff/Moving Party
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant/Responding Party
NOTICE MOTION FOR AN ORAL HEARING
TAKE NOTICE THAT the Plaintiff, David Raymond Amos pursuant to Rule
359 of the Federal Court Rules will make a motion to the Court on
Monday, April 10th, 2017 at 9:30 am as soon thereafter as the motion
can be heard at the Federal Court in Fredericton, New Brunswick.
THE MOTION IS FOR:
1. The Plaintiff seeks an order made by a Justice of Federal Court
whom he knows does not have an interest in the outcome of this lawsuit
affirming or denying the conflict of interest he has with the Justices
Richard Southcott, Catherine Kane, René LeBlanc, Glennys McVeigh,
Alan Diner, Yvan Roy, Martine St-Louis, Henry Brown, Cecily
Strickland, Denis Gascon, George Locke, Keith Boswell, Sylvie Roussel,
Simon Fothergill, Anne Marie McDonald, Yves de Montigny, Wyman Webb,
Donald Rennie, André Scott, Richard Boivin, David Near and David
Stratas. This order is sought before any hearing of a cross-appeal of
this matter is held within the Federal Court of Appeal
THE GROUNDS FOR THE MOTION ARE:
2. The aforementioned judges were named by the plaintiff on lists he
provided to the Registry Offices of the Federal Court and the Federal
Court of Appeal, the Canadian Judicial Council and the Commissioner of
Federal Judicial Affairs after Justice B. Richard Bell on December
14th, 2015 made an oral order to recuse himself from hearing this
matter. It is the Plaintiff's opinion that all judges must be held to
the same standard that Justice Bell filed on December 23rd, 2015.
"At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention
a letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
(now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal)."
And
"In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
[1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so."
THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTRY EVIDENCE will be used at the hearing of the
Plaintiff's Motion
1. True copies of numerous documents that the various solicitors and
agents of the CROWN and the associates of various law firms of the
aforementioned Justices of the Federal Court and the Federal Court of
Appeal have had in their possession before this claim was filed
against Her Majesty the Queen
DATED at Fredericton, New Brunswick, this the 14th day of March, 2017
___________________________
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
P.O. Box 234
Apohaqui, NB E5P 3G2
Plaintiff on his own behalf
TO: Administrator, Federal Court
AND TO: WILLIAM F. PENTNEY
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
per: JAN JENSEN
Department of Justice
Suite 1400-Duke Tower
5251 Duke Street
Halifax, NS B3J 1P3
Counsel for the Defendant
Records found for T-1557-15
Date Filed Office
2017-03-31 Halifax
Oral directions received from the presiding judge dated 31-MAR-2017
directing that "Further to the letter from counsel for the Defendant,
dated March 30, 2017, the Court will hold a teleconference with the
parties on April 3, 2017, at 2:00pm, ADT, in order to address the
issue of whether the Plaintiff's motion scheduled to be heard on April
10, 2017 in Fredericton, NB, should be adjourned sine die on the basis
of prematurity or, in the alternative, whether it should be adjourned
to another date given the unavailability of counsel for the Defendant
on April 10 (2017). The teleconference will be for a maximum duration
of 20 minutes." placed on file on 31-MAR-2017 Confirmed in writing to
the party(ies)
2017-03-30 Halifax
Letter from Defendant dated 30-MAR-2017 "I am counsel for the
Defendant in respect of the above noted matter.... First the date of
April 10, 2017 does not work for the Defendant because counsel has a
work matter previously scheduled.... Secondly the Court ought to
decline jurisdiction to hear this motion in any event.... We would be
receptive to a teleconference with the Court and the Plaintiff if the
matter of this motion might be resolved efficiently that way..."
received on 30-MAR-2017
2017-03-14 Fredericton
Affidavit of service of David Raymond Amos sworn on 14-MAR-2017 on
behalf of Plaintiff confirming service of Doc 21 upon Defendant by
Xpresspost on 14-MAR-2017 filed on 14-MAR-2017
2017-03-14 Fredericton
Notice of Motion on behalf of Plaintiff returnable at General Sitting
in Fredericton on 10-APR-2017 to begin at 09:30 duration: 2h language:
E for Order affirming or denying a conflict of interest filed on
14-MAR-2017
2016-12-19 Ottawa
Copy of Order dated 19-DEC-2016 rendered by The Honourable Mr. Justice
Webb The Honourable Mr. Justice Rennie The Honourable Mr. Justice de
Montigny placed on file. Original filed on Court File No. A-48-16
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/03/memorandum-of-fact-and-law-of.html
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)"
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 11:53:02 +0000
Subject: RE: Norman Sabourin, executive director of the Canadian
Judicial Council launches 'Potential misconduct' probe but only after
his associates in the Crown Corp CBC exposes hiis pals???
To: David Amos
Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be
assured that your email will be reviewed.
Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 07:52:50 -0400
Subject: Norman Sabourin, executive director of the Canadian Judicial
Council launches 'Potential misconduct' probe but only after his
associates in the Crown Corp CBC exposes hiis pals???
To: "Norman.Sabourin" , "harvey.cashore" , "marc.giroux" , mcu ,
"bill.pentney" , "bob.paulson" , "ralph.goodale" , "hon.melanie.joly"
, "David.McGuinty" , Geoff Regan , "heather.bradley" , "jan.jensen" ,
"Jody.Wilson-Raybould.a1" , postur , premier , "Stephen.Horsman" ,
Craig Munroe , "denis.landry2" , "serge.rousselle" , "brian.gallant" ,
"Katie.Telford" , "Gerald.Butts" , "Michael.Wernick" , pm ,
"ht.lacroix" , newsroom , news , "steve.murphy" , nmoore ,
"alison.crawford" , "David.Coon" , david , "blaine.higgs"
Cc: David Amos , oldmaison , andre , president
Methinks Mr Norman Sabourin, his buddy Marc A. Giroux, Deputy Commissioner
Federal Judicial Affairs Canada and their cohorts really should be
preparing to argue mean old me in Federal Court N'esy Pas Mr Prime
Minister Trudeau "The Younger" ???
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/03/memorandum-of-fact-and-law-of.html
Wednesday, 8 March 2017
MEMORANDUM OF FACT AND LAW OF THE RESPONDENT ON CROSS-APPEAL
http://www.fja-cmf.gc.ca/home-accueil/index-eng.html
Welcome to the Website of the Office of the Commissioner for Federal
Judicial Affairs Canada
The Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs reports directly to the
Minister of Justice. The Office of the Commissioner was established in
1978 to safeguard the independence of the judiciary and provide
federally appointed judges with administrative services independent of
the Department of Justice.
Duties and responsibilities include:
administering Part I of the Judges Act, which deals with
eligibility for appointment, retirement age, and salaries of federally
appointed judges;
preparing a budget and providing services and staff to the
Canadian Judicial Council;
providing support to the Independent Advisory Committee for
Supreme Court of Canada Judicial Appointments;
managing the Judicial Appointments Secretariat, which administers
17 advisory committees responsible for evaluating candidates for
federal judicial appointments;
managing the Federal Courts Reports Section, which is responsible
for selecting and publishing Federal Court of Appeal and Federal Court
decisions in both official languages;
administering a judicial intranet called JUDICOM, which provides
judges with email, a secure and restricted communication system, and a
virtual library;
providing language training to judges in both official languages;
coordinating initiatives related to the Canadian judiciary's role
in international cooperation.
In order to carry out these activities and provide services to
approximately 1,100 active judges and 850 retired judges and their
survivors in Canada, the Commissioner is assisted by the Deputy
Commissioner, seven Directors and, at present, 70 other staff members.
This Web site is designed to inform all Canadians about FJA's role and
activities in judicial affairs in Canada. We welcome any requests for
information and any comments or suggestions. Please do not hesitate to
Contact Us.
Enjoy your visit to our site!
Marc A. Giroux, Deputy Commissioner
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 19:13:47 -0400
Subject: Hey Frank you got it wrong I was offering to help your client
Justice Robin Camp BTW say Hey to Marie Henein, Alan Gold and the
ghost of Eddy Greensan for me for me
To: faddario@addario.ca, "Norman.Sabourin"
, ministryofjustice, "Kathleen.Ganley", mhenein
Cc: David Amos , sfine
---------- Original message ----------
From: Frank Addario
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 22:34:05 +0000
Subject: Re: A-48-16 scanned documents Hey Frank I just called from
902 800 0369 Enjoy the attachment
To: David Amos
Cc: David Amos
David, thanks for your phone call.
I don¹t think there is anything I can do to help you
Frank Addario
T. 1.416.649.5055
F. 1.866.714.1196
171 John Street, Suite 101
Toronto, ON M5T 1X3
www.addario.ca
f>
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2016/09/re-justice-camp-malicious-nonsense.html
Wednesday, 7 September 2016
RE Justice Camp malicious nonsense versus the RCMP, Peter MacKay
Federal Court, the Canadian Judicial Council and its cover up of the
Monumental Newfy sexual abuse issues
Court File No. A-48-16
(Federal Court No: T-1557-15)
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Plaintiff/Respondent on Cross-Appeal
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant/Appellant on Cross-Appeal
MEMORANDUM OF FACT AND LAW OF THE
RESPONDENT ON CROSS-APPEAL
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS WILLIAM F. PENTNEY Q.C.
P.O. Box 234
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Apohaqui, NB
per: JAN JENSEN
E5P 3G2
Department of Justice
Suite 1400, Duke Tower
5251 Duke Street
Halifax, NS B3J 1P3
Telephone No: (902) 800-0369 Telephone
No: (902) 426-8177
Fax No: (506) 432-6089 Fax No:
(902) 426-2329
E-Mail: David Raymond.Amos@gmail.com E-Mail:
Jan.Jensen@justice.gc.ca
Respondent on his own behalf Solicitors
for the Appellant
CONTENTS
OVERVIEW…………………………………………………………….……... ……2
PART I – STATEMENT OF FACTS..……...………………………...……………..4
PART II – ISSUES…… .…………………………………………………………….8
PART III – SUBMISSIONS …,,,…………………...………………………………..9
PART IV – ORDER SOUGHT ………………………………………………….....10
PART V – LIST OF AUTHORITIES…………………...……………………..…...11
OVERVIEW
1. On December 14, 2015. the Plaintiff/Appellant/Respondent on
Cross-Appeal, David Raymond Amos (AMOS) began his study all the
Justices on the bench in Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal
after a hearing of an appeal of this matter before Justice B. Richard
Bell. The judge acted ethically after discussing the issues he read
within the motions and evidence filed by AMOS and counsels to Her
Majesty the Queen (CROWN). Justice Bell named many parties whom he,
the CROWN and AMOS were familiar with then delivered an oral order for
another hearing of the appeal and recused himself referring to the
applicable test regarding allegations of bias based on Justice de
Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in Committee for Justice and Liberty et
al v National Energy Board et al, [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for.
2. AMOS, provided the Registry Office of the Federal Court with a
list of judges with whom he had a conflict of interest over two weeks
before the upcoming hearing on January 11, 2016. The list of Justices
in Federal Court is as follows: Justices Richard F. Southcott, Sylvie
E. Roussel, Catherine M. Kane, Yvan Roy, Cecily Y. Strickland, Glennys
L. McVeigh, George R. Locke, Martine St-Louis, René LeBlanc, Henry S.
Brown, Alan Diner, Keith M. Boswell, Denis Gascon, Simon Fothergill,
Anne Marie McDonald and B. Richard Bell.
3. On January 11, 2016, AMOS stood before Justice Richard F.
Southcott and did his best to explain why the judge should recuse
himself. Justice Southcott did not agree and stated he would only hear
arguments with regard to the faulty motions made by the CROWN (The
motion to strike named the wrong defendant and the opposition to the
appeal was unsigned and served very late). The judge refused to look
at the plaintiff's motion in opposition to the defendant's motion to
strike or the evidence supporting the appeal of the prothonotary's
decision that Justice Bell had discussed with AMOS and the CROWN one
month earlier. AMOS objected to Justice Southcott's actions and
informed him that whatever he decided would be appealed forthwith.
Justice Southcott reserved his decision.
4. On February 4, 2016, AMOS filed this appeal of Justice
Southcott's order. In a sincere effort to offset what had occurred
Federal Court with regards to conflicts of interest, the Registry
Office of the Federal Court of Appeal was provided with the list of
Justices of this court whom the plaintiff had issues with before he
filed any documents into the record of this matter. The list of
Justices is as follows: Justices David W. Stratas, Yves de Montigny,
Richard Boivin, André F.J. Scott, Donald J. Rennie, Wyman W. Webb,
David G. Near and C. Michael Ryer (Who resigned effective May 1, 2016)
5. On February 12, 2016, this cross appeal was filed by Her
Majesty the Queen thereby making the plaintiff, David Raymond Amos the
respondent. Solicitors of the CROWN continued in their incompetent and
unethical defence by claiming that the Federal Court erred in its
decisions because it did not have jurisdiction to hear the matter.
6. On January 30, 2017, the CROWN faxed 4 pages of a memorandum
of fact and law of the respondent byway. Whereas AMOS knew he was the
respondent on cross- appeal, he suspected the CROWN had discovered its
error and stopped the fax transmission in order to correct it. On
February 2, 2017, the CROWN sent a fax stating that it had notified
the court of its error and sought directions from the court. The
plaintiff heard nothing further from the court about the mistake made
by the CROWN. Later he received hard copy of a memorandum of fact and
law of the respondent byway of regular Canada Post. The Registry
Office instructed the plaintiff to file a memorandum of fact and law
of the respondent by March 6, 2016 and leave it for the judges of this
court to decide the matter.
7. The CROWN has filed another faulty document with an incomplete
statement of facts and wishes to argue a recent decision made on
August 31, 2016 by a coram of judges in which a correction was made on
February 23, 2017.
8. The actions of the CROWN in matter caused it to be subject to
more claims.
PART I – STATEMENT OF FACTS
9. On September 16, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a statement of
claim (The Claim) against Her Majesty the Queen. The plaintiff when to
great length to explain to the court why his rights under the Canadian
Charter of Rights and Freedoms Sections 2 (s) and (d) had been
breached and why the Federal Court was the only court to have the
jurisdiction to hear this matter.
10. On October 16, 2015, the plaintiff received a copy of a notice of
a motion that the CROWN filed with a heading falsely stating that the
Claim was against the Attorney General of Canada. The CROWN asked the
court to strike the Claim in its entirety pursuant to Rule 221 (1),
(a) and (c) and to award the defendant the costs of creating its
incompetent motion.
11. On October 26, 2015, AMOS filed a motion in opposition to the
motion to strike. The plaintiff did not recognize the standing of a
Prothonotary to dismiss a claim seeking eleven million dollars in the
form of relief. The plaintiff sought an oral argument before a Justice
of Federal Court and asked for costs in the creation of his motion in
response.
12. On November 12, 2015, the Registry Office in Montreal faxed a
redacted copy of the Order of the Prothonotary, Richard Morneau. The
Registry Office of Federal Court in Montreal would not respond to the
plaintiff's queries as to what was written on the third page of the
court order.
13. On November 19, 2015, the Registry Office in Ottawa faxed a true
copy of the order of the Prothonotary, Richard Morneau after the
plaintiff had contacted and complained to the Attorney General of
Canada, Federal Court's legal counsel and the Office of Commissioner
of Judicial Affairs amongst others. Once the plaintiff read the third
page of the order he understood why it had been redacted. It stated
"No costs are awarded to the defendant since none were requested by
same". It was obvious that the Registry Office in Montreal acted
fraudulently because the prothonotary had not studied any of the
documents in the record at all.
14. On November 20, 2015, the plaintiff filed a notice of motion for
hearing on December 14, 2015 in order to appeal the decision to the
prothonotary.
15. On December 8, 2015, the plaintiff filed a motion record of the
appeal with a supporting affidavit and exhibits. One exhibit was a
true copy of an American police surveillance wiretap tape which is one
of many he has in his possession that all law enforcement authorities
in Canada and the USA he has encountered have refuse to investigate.
16. On December 14, 2014, Justice B. Richard Bell discussed with the
plaintiff some of the documents on file in the record and their common
concerns then ethically recused himself on his own motion. Another
hearing of the motion to appeal was scheduled for January 11, 2016.
17. On or about December 22, 2015, the plaintiff provided the
Registry Office a list of all the judges seated in on the bench in
Federal Court that had a conflict of interest with the him in order to
prevent another hearing as had occurred with Justice Bell.
18. On January 11, 2016, AMOS stood before Justice Richard F.
Southcott and did his best to explain why the judge should recuse
himself. Justice Southcott did not agree and stated he would only hear
arguments with regard to the faulty motions made by the CROWN (The
motion to strike named the wrong defendant and the opposition to the
appeal was unsigned and served very late). The judge refused to look
at the plaintiff's motion in opposition to the defendant's motion to
strike or the evidence supporting the appeal of the prothonotary's
decision that Justice Bell had discussed with AMOS and the CROWN one
month earlier. AMOS objected to Justice Southcott's actions and
informed him that whatever he decided would be appealed forthwith.
Justice Southcott reserved his decision.
19. On February 4, 2016, the plaintiff filed an appeal of Justice
Southcott's order and the Registry Office of the Federal Court of
Appeal was provided with the list of Justices of this court who have a
conflict of interest with him.
20. On February 12, 2016, this cross appeal was filed by Her Majesty
the Queen thereby making the plaintiff, David Raymond Amos the
respondent in this memorandum of fact and law.
21. Solicitors of the CROWN continued in their incompetent and
unethical defence of their client in the Federal Court of Appeal. They
began by by refusing to discuss the contents of the appeal book until
it was too late to do so then faxing a document containing their
demands and quoting the rules of the court.
22. In April of 2016 after attempting to resolve his longstanding
concerns with the Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police,
the Commissioner of Federal Judicial Affairs, the Canadian Judicial
Council, the Commissioner of Revenue Canada, the Attorney Generals of
the United States and Canada, the plaintiff became aware a of a
webpage hosted by a server based in Sweden about this very lawsuit.
The malicious webpage within the egregious website entitled known as
Encyclopedia Dramatica was supported by a new round of blogs and
YouTube channels based in the USA. In an effort to put a stop to the
malice and bring this matter to a conclusion. The plaintiff requested
an oral hearing of this matter in confidence to this court's judicial
administrator pursuant to Rule 35.
23. The plaintiff heard nothing back from the Judicial Administrator
of the Federal Court of Appeal. However the confidential letter and
the draft of the motion the judicial administrator had requested was
placed the public record and a copy was sent to the CROWN.
24. On May 5, 2016 the CROWN docketed a letter addressed to an
unnamed party within the Federal Court of Appeal insulting the
plaintiff and ridiculing his confidential letter to the Judicial
Administrator. The plaintiff heard nothing further from the court on
the topic so he filed a motion seeking case management and directions
from the court about the creation of the appeal book.
25. On May12, 2016, Justice Trudel made an order denying an oral
hearing and case management and providing directions on the appeal
book.
26. On June 10, 2016, the plaintiff followed the order of Justice
Trudel and filed a motion about in the creation of the appeal book.
27. On June 20, 2016, the CROWN responded changing its demands about
the creation of transcripts and opposed the filing of important
documents supporting the plaintiff's claim being recorded within the
appeal book.
28. On July 4, 2016, Justice David Stratas made the order pertaining
to the creation of the appeal book instead of Justice Trudel. The
plaintiff went forward and created the appeal book so that he would
not be in default. However he could not ethically follow any orders of
judges that he and the court knew he had a conflict of interest with.
Some lawyers working for the Federal government and certain private
lawyers are well aware that the plaintiff has no respect for Justice
Stratas whatsoever. The lack of respect is caused by Justice Stratas'
former partnership with the Heenan Blaikie law firm and his
appointment as a Special Advocate by the Harper government. The
plaintiff diligently attempted to tried resolve his concerns about
Justice Stratas in confidence with the Attorney General of Canada and
the Canadian Judicial Council and was ignored.
29. On Oct 17, 2016, Justice Pelletier issued an order for a status
review and the plaintiff responded on November 21,2016 which was one
day later due to human error. The Registry Office did not record the
response in the docket and would not permit the plaintiff to file the
motion that Justice Trudel had stated he could file until further
notice from the court.
30. On November 30, 2016, CROWN also responded to the status review
stating things that were definitely not true while admitting its
knowledge of police surveillance wiretap tapes and many other things
yet still considered the Claim to be frivolous and vexatious.
31. On December 19, 2016, three Justices that the Federal Court of
Appeal is well aware that the plaintiff has a conflict of interest
with dismissed the appeal in writing without having to meet him in a
public hearing and deny the conflict.
PART II – ISSUES
32. The plaintiff considers that the CROWN is being frivolous and
vexatious to claim that the Federal Court does not have jurisdiction
over legislative affairs in the Province of New Brunswick in light of
the fact that New Brunswick has no Constitution whatsoever.
Irrefutable proof is the Constitution Amendment, 1993 (New
Brunswick).The Governor General and Commander-in-Chief was advised by
the Queen's Privy Council to issue a proclamation in order to amend
the Constitution of Canada that was recorded by the Registrar General
of Canada. Therefore the plaintiff has every right to defend his
rights and freedoms under the Constitution Act, 1982 in New Brunswick.
Furthermore the plaintiff has stated several times though out the
documents found in the record of this matter that he has been barred
from access to the House of Commons, the National Capital District,
all provincial legislative properties, the University of New Brunswick
and the Town of Woodstock New Brunswick apparently for the benefit of
his political opponents and their many cohorts.
33. The Governor General, the Attorney General of Canada, many
parliamentarians, the Commissioner and many members of the Royal
Canadian Mounted Police, many members of the Canadian Forces, the
Canadian Judicial Council, the the Commissioner of Federal Judicial
Affairs, Commissioner of Public Sector Integrity, the Commissioner of
Revenue Canada, many solicitors acting on behalf of the CROWN at a
Federal and provincial level throughout Canada have continued to
refuse to act within the scope of their employment in dealing with the
plaintiff since he first ran for a seat in the 38th Parliament in
2004.
34. The Governor General of admitted in writing that she had two sets
of documents and a CD of the plaintiff's (one set was forwarded from
the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick) involving public corruption.
All public servants are relying on the actions of the Attorney General
of Canada and the judges of this court to make the plaintiff's
concerns appear to be frivolous, vexatious and without any merit
whatsoever. However not one lawyer is willing to argue the plaintiff.
35. The plaint must remind the court that since the Claim was filed,
four lawyers three parliamentarians and one former parliamentarian
have responded to the plaintiff in writing. They are Minister of
Heritage Melanie Joly, David McQunity MP, Geoff Regan the Speaker of
the House of Commons and Peter Milliken the former Speaker of the
House of Commons when the plaintiff was barred from that public
property in 2006. The plaintiff has filed their communications to him
in the public record of this matter and the evidence of it has been
ignored.
PART III – SUBMISSIONS
36. Whereas the CROWN now wishes to argue a recent decision involving
the actions of a prothonotary, the plaintiff to relies on the Rules of
Federal Court Section 50 in particular. It states as follows:
50 (1) A prothonotary may hear, and make any necessary orders relating
to, any motion under these Rules other than a motion
(a) in respect of which these Rules or an Act of Parliament has
expressly conferred jurisdiction on a judge;
(b) in the Federal Court of Appeal;
(c) for summary judgment or summary trial other than
(i) in an action referred to in subsection (2), or
(2) A prothonotary may hear an action exclusively for monetary
relief, or an action in rem claiming monetary relief, in which no
amount claimed by a
51 (1) An order of a prothonotary may be appealed by a motion to a
judge of the Federal Court.
(2) Notice of the motion shall be served and filed within 10 days
after the day on which the order under appeal was made and at least
four days before the day fixed for the hearing of the motion.
PART IV – ORDER SOUGHT
The plaintiff therefore asks this court for the following relief:
(a) A public apology by the Prime Minister and each Premier for the
illegal barring of a citizen from access to parliamentary properties.
(b) A declaration signed by the Minister of Public Safety and
witnessed by the Governor General stating that the Canadian government
will no longer allow the RCMP and the Canadian Forces to harass the
Plaintiff and his Clan.
(c) A settlement of eleven million dollars ($11,000,000.00) in the
form of relief and punitive damages for being barred from eleven
parliamentary properties for eleven years.
(d) Costs to the Plaintiff in bringing this matter before the court
___________________________
Dated March 6, 2017 DAVID
RAYMOND AMOS
P.O. Box 234
Apohaqui, NB
E5P 3G2
Respondent on his own behalf
TO: Administrator, Federal Court of Appeal
AND TO: WILLIAM F. PENTNEY
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
per: JAN JENSEN
Department of Justice
Suite 1400-Duke Tower
5251 Duke Street
Halifax, NS B3J 1P3
Solicitors for the Appellant
PART V – LIST OF AUTHORITIES
The Constitution Act, 1867
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Schedule B to the
Canada Act 1982 (U.K.) 1982, c. 11,
The Crown Liability and Proceedings Act. R.S., 1985, c. C-50, s. 1;
1990, c. 8, s. 21.
The Federal Courts Act R.S.C., 1985, c. F-7
The Federal Courts Rules SOR/2004-283, s. 2.
No comments:
Post a Comment