---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 22:36:45 -0300
Subject: Yo Sarah Miller while you are waiting for disclosure why not say
Hey for me to Premier Moe and the sneaky lawyer David Eby as well?
To: millers@jssbarristers.ca, Office of the Premier
<scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, sheilagunnreid@gmail.com,
jaffelawfirm@gmail.com, themayor@calgary.ca, cps
<cps@calgarypolice.ca>, david.menzies@rebelnews.com, jcarpay@jccf.ca,
drea.humphrey@rebelnews.com, "david.eby.mla"
<david.eby.mla@leg.bc.ca>, newsroom@abbynews.com, premier
<premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, lawyer@divorce-for-men.com
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSqyM8fAHy8&ab_channel=RebelNews
Father of trans child JAILED for speaking out against gender transition
25,527 views
•Mar 18, 2021
Rebel News
1.45M subscribers
Drea Humphrey was outside of a British Columbia courthouse where the
father of a trans child was jailed for violating the terms of a
publication ban after he attempted to speak out against the reasons he
thought his daughter had determined to transition to male.
FULL REPORT from Drea Humphrey: https://rebelne.ws/38VnVLo
Rebel News: Telling the other side of the story.
https://www.rebelnews.com for more great Rebel content.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0kLLx9MJTf0&ab_channel=RebelNews
Cops PRESSURED by health authority to ticket Full Gospel Outreach
Church in Saskatchewan
2,814 views
•Mar 18, 2021
Rebel News
1.45M subscribers
The Full Gospel Outreach Centre church in Prince Albert, Saskatchewan
was levied a $14,000 fine in October. It was, at the time, the largest
lockdown ticket issued, for failing to force the congregants attending
services to wear masks.
FULL REPORT from Sheila Gunn Reid ► https://rebelne.ws/30Vyeur
https://saskatoon.ctvnews.ca/church-is-definitely-an-essential-service-prince-albert-pastor-fights-14k-covid-19-fine-1.5249966
'Church is definitely an essential service': Prince Albert pastor
fights $14K COVID-19 fine
Jayda Taylor
Published Thursday, December 31, 2020 2:23PM CST
PRINCE ALBERT -- The Prince Albert Full Gospel Outreach Centre is
heading to court to fight a $14,000 fine issued for violating COVID-19
public health orders.
A Saskatchewan Health Authority public health officer handed over the
ticket to Pastor Vern Temple in October. The fine was issued for
non-compliance to public health orders and places of worship
guidelines during a 100-day revival series.
The event was connected to 86 first and second generation COVID-19
cases in 17 different communities in the province.
Temple said COVID-19 restrictions show an inequity towards religious
organizations. He questioned why the government allows large groups of
people to shop at a liquor store, while religious services are limited
to 30. At the time of the fine, places of worship were allowed up to
150 people while following public health measures.
“I think the government is not seeing the significance and the
importance of the church,” said Temple.
"The church is definitely an essential service. (It’s) important not
just in the past, but even now with the pandemic happening and people
in isolation, it's even more important now."
Temple said the pandemic is hurting people’s spiritual health, not
just physical health. People don’t just go to health care facilities
to receive help, he said.
He said churches, along with all other religious organizations, should
be treated as essential, no different than grocery stores.
“I think my spiritual life is more important than my physical life.
You can’t live without food. A spiritual person will take the same
perspective that I really can’t do well in life and I may not even
live long without spiritual food.”
Calgary-based lawyer Sarah Miller will be representing the Full Gospel
Outreach Centre in court. She said the health authority has not
disclosed why the fine was issued and likely won’t before their first
court date scheduled for Mar. 8.
Miller said their defence will involve Charter rights to freedom of
religion and association.
“The outreach provides valuable community services for marginalized
and indigent people in Prince Albert. The voluntary payment that the
Saskatchewan Health Authority selected to fine the outreach is
$14,000. This is an incredible amount for the SHA to expect such an
organization to pay. Obviously the outreach has limited resources,”
she said in an emailed statement.
“On the information we have currently, it appears that the SHA has
overreached in this case and the fine does not appear to be an
appropriate or fair exercise of their authority.”
“It is believed that the Summons arose from a photo which was shared
online,” added Miller.
A photo posted on Facebook in September shows a group of people who
appear not to be appropriately physical distancing. Temple said
further into the series, they moved to a larger room to space people
out.
After the fine was announced, Premier Scott Moe tweeted “While this
fine is necessary, we don’t want people to be fined. We just want them
to follow public health guidelines.”
Temple said the church provides a sense of belonging, shelter and food
to people on the streets. When they were ordered to temporarily close,
he said it put a void in their lives.
“That was the disappointing thing, was that I could see transformation
taking place in these people’s lives,” said Temple.
“They were coming out every night, and a little bit more sober every
night and even coming completely sober for several nights … and then
it was just gone.”
Temple said the Full Gospel Outreach Centre has reopened, hosting
about three services a week. He said they’re following COVID-19
prevention measures, including physical distancing, wearing masks and
sanitizing.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
> Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2021 20:03:59 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Sarah Miller we ust talked until you
> got bored with me So please say Hey to Mayor Nenshi his high school
> buddy Ezzy Levant the Calgary cops and your client Artur Pawlowski for
> me will ya?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
>
> Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
> that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
> understanding.
>
> If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
> visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.
>
> If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
> (506) 453-2144.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Bonjour,
>
> Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
>
> Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
> quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
> Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
>
> Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
> veuillez visiter
> www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.
>
> S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
> Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
>
> Merci.
>
>
> Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
> P.O Box/C. P. 6000
> Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick
> E3B 5H1
> Canada
> Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
> Email/Courriel:
> premier@gnb.ca/premierministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
> <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
> Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 00:25:24 +0000
> Subject: RE: YO Higgy after you used a young one's tragic demise for
> political gain against Trudeau I sent you an email and created another
> another blog Now I see Norm Bosse the old conservative Sussex school
> teacher/lawyer is yapping AGAIN???
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
> comments.
> Due to the evolving COVID-19 situation, we apologize in advance for
> any delay in responding to your enquiry. In the meantime, information
> on Canada's COVID-19 Economic Response Plan is available on the
> Government of Canada website at
> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus> or by
> calling 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) or 1-833-784-4397.
>
> Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
> Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
> En raison de la fluidité de la crise de la COVID-19, il est possible
> que nous retardions à vous répondre et nous nous en excusons.
> Entre-temps, les informations au sujet du Plan d'intervention
> économique du Canada pour répondre à la COVID-19 sont disponibles dans
> le site Web du gouvernement du Canada au
> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus> ou en
> composant le
> 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) ou le 1-833-784-4397.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2021 15:59:47 -0400
> Subject: Attn Sarah Miller we ust talked until you got bored with me
> So please say Hey to Mayor Nenshi his high school buddy Ezzy Levant
> the Calgary cops and your client Artur Pawlowski for me will ya?
> To: millers@jssbarristers.ca, sheilagunnreid@gmail.com,
> david.menzies@rebelnews.com, jcarpay@jccf.ca, mmoore@jccf.ca,
> "david.eby.mla" <david.eby.mla@leg.bc.ca>, newsroom@abbynews.com,
> premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>,
> "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, vantips@postmedia.com, premier
> <premier@ontario.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
> newstips@thestar.ca, jaffelawfirm@gmail.com
> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, themayor
> <themayor@calgary.ca>, cps <cps@calgarypolice.ca>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sA1n-qr9EtY&t=88s&ab_channel=RebelNews
>
> Lawyer for Pastor James Coates: “No evidence” Alberta health orders
> serve public safety, says John Carpay
>
> By Rebel News | March 05, 2021
>
> Remove Ads
>
> Pastor James Coates of GraceLife Church has been held in custody at
> the Edmonton Remand Centre for nearly two weeks. This morning, after
> finding out that the pastor's bail hearing was denied, Ezra Levant
> invited lawyer John Carpay of the Justice Centre for Constitutional
> Freedoms on to our Rebel News Daily livestream to discuss the case.
>
> Make sure to watch the full video, but here's some of what John had to
> say about the ongoing legal difficulties faced by an Alberta religious
> leader arrested for refusing to shut down his church and turn
> believers away:
>
> “The silver lining on that cloud is that, because of the suffering
> of Pastor Coates, the government's going to be forced to show the
> public the science, the evidence [for lockdowns] for the first time
> ever.
>
> “Because all we've had in the last twelve months is fear-mongering
> and speculation and assertions, and the government doesn't have the
> evidence... they're going to have to scramble hard in the next two
> months to come up with it.”
>
> When asked about the type of charges laid against the pastor, John
> responded:
>
> “My understanding is that Pastor Coates would not go to prison,
> unless he was found in contempt of court. And if so, the Alberta
> government sought a specific injunction against GraceLife Church in
> Edmonton... and was successful -- if there was specific court
> injunction against that church, and if Pastor Coates or other members
> of that church... defied the injunction, they could be found to be in
> contempt of court.
>
> “...my understanding is that there's no jail time for that.”
>
> Pastor James Coates of GraceLife Church will remain in prison until May.
>
> Sign our petition to show your support and take a stand against the
> tyrannical COVID enforcement Pastor James and his church are facing at
> FreePastorJames.com.
>
> https://www.rebelnews.com/religion_vs_state_day_2_should_churches_in_bc_really_be_closed
>
>
> Religion vs. State Day 2: should churches in B.C. really be closed?
>
> By Drea Humphrey | March 05, 2021
>
>
> Should churches really be closed in BC?
>
> On Tuesday, I went back to the Vancouver courts to report on the
> second day of a Supreme Court of British Columbia hearing, where Chief
> Justice Christopher Hinkson is set to rule on a legal challenge that
> was filed by the the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms. The
> JCCF is challenging the B.C. government's restrictions against
> peaceful protests and in-person worship services.
>
> On day one of the hearing, there were many pastors and protesters
> outside of the courthouse, speaking out about why in desperate times
> like these, churches desperately need to be open. Zoom services just
> don't cut it for everyone.
>
> This got me wondering, what does the average Vancouverite feel about
> Provincial Health Officer Dr. Bonnie Henry’s decision to ban in-person
> worship services, while keeping nearly everything else open, including
> pubs like St. James Well, which was recently linked to over 300
> COVID-19 cases? Also, do they believe people should be able to
> exercise their right to peacefully protest during life with COVID-19?
> And if they do agree with most of the COVID-19 restrictions placed on
> the people, exactly how long do they believe society should have to
> follow such restrictions?
>
> So many questions, and day two of this hearing was the perfect place
> to ask them, across the street from the courthouse. Passerby couldn’t
> help but look in the direction of the courthouse, as there were two
> types of demonstrations occurring outside of it. While one was there
> to gather for an outdoor church service in protest for freedom of
> religion, the two groups shared a common cause over the right to
> protest. That’s because the second group was gathering in protest
> while inside, Stacy Gallagher, an Indigenous opponent of the Trans
> Mountain pipeline, was sentenced to 90 days in prison after being
> convicted of criminal contempt for her mobilization against the
> pipeline.
>
> If you’d like to support the independent journalism that I do as well
> as make sure you have access to all our reports, including exclusive
> ones, please subscribe at RebelNewsPlus.com.
>
> Paul Jaffe.
> 1050-1188 Georgia St
> W, Vancouver BC,
> V6E 4A2 ·
> Tel 604-687-2326
> Email: jaffelawfirm@gmail.com.
> Cell: 604-230-9155.
>
>
> Deja Vu Anyone
>
>
>
>
> https://www.thestar.com/vancouver/2019/10/18/former-cop-who-blew-whistle-wants-standing-in-bc-money-laundering-inquiry.html
>
> Former cop who blew whistle wants standing in B.C. money laundering inquiry
> By The Canadian Press
> Fri., Oct. 18, 2019
>
>
>
> https://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/ian-mulgrew-lawyers-clash-over-money-laundering-at-law-society-hearing
>
> Ian Mulgrew: Lawyers clash over 'money laundering' at law society hearing
>
> A Law Society of B.C. disciplinary hearing descended Tuesday into
> acrimony and occasional raised voices over the regulatory body’s
> ability and willingness to police money laundering.
> Author of the article: Ian Mulgrew Publishing date:Jul 12, 2017
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BA2h7OFA0gw&ab_channel=RebelNews
>
> Arrests, tickets and no answers: Toronto police continue crackdown on
> anti-lockdown protests
> 25,337 views
> Premiered Mar 5, 2021
> Rebel News
> 1.45M subscribers
> ►http://www.FightTheFines.com
> David Menzies covers another anti-lockdown protest in Toronto on
> February 27, 2021, where protesters were once again arrested, given
> tickets and Toronto police continued to offer no answers to Menzies
> questions.
> FULL REPORT from David Menzies: http://rebelne.ws/3c3ZnR8
>
> Rebel News: Telling the other side of the story.
> https://www.rebelnews.com for more great Rebel content.
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwZOijbE4JQ&ab_channel=RebelNews
>
> MORE SUCCESS: Calgary street church pastor has mask bylaw tickets thrown
> out
>
> By Sheila Gunn Reid | March 04, 2021
>
> Today I have another FightTheFines.com victory to report, this one in
> the ongoing saga of Calgary Street Church Pastor Artur Pawlowski.
>
> Rebel News viewers may recognize Art as one of our very first
> www.FightTheFines.com cases. He had been fined $1,200 for supposedly
> breaching the lockdown. In reality, he was helping feed downtown
> Calgary's homeless population, something Art does as part of his
> ministry to those who need it the most.
>
> We hired a lawyer to help Art, and police ended up dropping that
> ridiculous fine. But then the lockdown returned, and so did the
> systemic crackdown on Art's outreach to hungry and homeless. Art and
> his brother were charged with organizing a protest, for violating
> orders on outdoor gatherings — I guess that's what we call feeding the
> hungry these days. They were also charged for not wearing a mask while
> distributing food to the homeless, even though Art and his brother
> were both outside, where you don't have to wear a mask.
>
> Art's been a long time critic of Calgary Mayor Naheed Nenshi, and it
> looked like city officials were taking out their petty grievances on
> Art and using their new coronavirus ticket books to do it.
>
> The top-notch lawyer we hired for Art who got those first fines thrown
> out, Sarah Miller, now has another win for Art: she was able to have
> the mask violation fines tossed out. However, Sarah's work isn't even
> close to done. Art isn't going to stop feeding the homeless, and it
> appears the City of Calgary isn't going to stop ticketing him for
> doing it. Because of this, the fines are piling up, and so is Sarah's
> work to fight for her client.
>
> If you'd like to help us secure more wins for Art and other Canadians
> with coronavirus fines as we fight for civil liberties, one lockdown
> ticket at a time, please donate today at www.FightTheFines.com.
>
>
> https://jssbarristers.ca/litigators/sarah-miller/
>
> Sarah Miller
> 403-571-1051
> millers@jssbarristers.ca
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 22:36:12 -0400
> Subject: Police threaten BC church with Canada Revenue Agency
> investigation???
> To: baptistchurch@shaw.ca, drea.humphrey@rebelnews.com
> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
> Diane.Lebouthillier@parl.gc.ca, "Brenda.Lucki"
> <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>
> https://www.rebelnews.com/police_threaten_bc_church_with_canada_revenue_agency_investigation_for_in_person_church_services
>
> https://www.100milebaptist.com/leaders
>
> Pastor
> Grant Reich
> email | Tel: 250-791-9253
> Board of Directors
> Barry Van Der Greft
> email | Tel: 250-791-9253
> Dave Rutledge
> email | Tel: 250-791-9253
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 18:10:31 -0400
> Subject: Attn Mike Hovland after I heard the news on CBC we talked
> Here is a little proof of what I told you is true Ask the media or
> James Kitchen, Paul Claassen, Mike Lokken Artur Pawlowski and all
> their cohorts if I am a liar or not
> To: mike@gbflacrete.org, art@streetchurch.ca, themayor
> <themayor@calgary.ca>, mike.lokken@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> don.iveson@edmonton.ca, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
> <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "martin.gaudet" <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, "Paul.Lynch"
> <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, JKitchen@jccf.ca,
> "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, media@jccf.ca, "Robert. Jones"
> <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, english@rcinet.ca
>
> Mike Hovland
> Address: 10201 99th Avenue
> La Crete , Alberta T0H 2H0
> Phone: 780-909-4499
> Website: https://www.gbflacrete.org/
>
> Email: mike@gbflacrete.org
>
>
> https://www.rcinet.ca/en/2021/03/05/judge-rules-edmonton-pastor-will-remain-in-jail-until-his-trial-in-may/
>
> Judge rules Edmonton pastor will remain in jail until his trial in May
>
> By Terry Haig |
> english@rcinet.ca
> Posted: Friday, March 5, 2021 13:45
>
> An Alberta pastor who has clashed for months with provincial health
> authorities over COVID-19 restrictions will remain in jail until he
> goes to trial in May because he refuses to follow a bail condition
> that requires he comply with public health orders.
>
> The pastor, James Coates of the GraceLife Church in Parkland County
> west of Edmonton, has been in jail for over two weeks and was
> appealing his bail conditions.
>
> After hearing arguments yesterday from Coates’s lawyers, Court of
> Queen’s Bench Justice Peter Michalyshyn dismissed the bail review this
> morning.
>
> Coates is charged with violating Alberta’s Public Health Act and with
> breaking a promise to abide by conditions of his bail release, which
> is a Criminal Code offence.
>
> Supporters pray outside an Edmonton court in February after James
> Coates was arrested for holding Sunday services in violation of
> COVID-19 rules. (THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jason Franson)
>
> His lawyer, James Kitchen, told the court Thursday that Coates can’t
> follow a bail condition that forbids him from holding services because
> that would violate his conscience by disobeying God.
>
> “This is a matter of deep-seeded personal conscience and religious
> beliefs for Pastor Coates,” Kitchen said.
>
> “He is unable to disobey the God he believes in. He is compelled to
> obey … as [are] his congregants.”
>
> The prosecution argued that Coates’s release would be a danger to the
> public.
>
> Outside the courthouse, dozens of Coates’s supporters gathered–many of
> them not wearing face masks–and more than 350 attended the hearing via
> the court’s web conferencing software.
>
> Some failed to mute their microphones, leading to frequent disruptions.
>
> Supporters rallied outside court yesterday as lawyers for James Coates
> appealed his bail conditions. (THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jason Franson)
>
> Coates turned himself in to police on Feb. 16 and was charged with two
> counts in contravention of the Public Health Act and charged for
> failing to comply with a condition of his undertaking.
>
> He refused release, saying he could not abide by the conditions.
>
> Prior to his detention, his Sunday services were drawing up to 300
> members, and in early February Coates was charged for a second time
> for breaking the rules.
>
> He was fined in December and Alberta Health Services ordered the
> church to close in January, but Coates ignored the orders.
>
> The church has continued to hold services, even though Coates is in
> custody.
>
> With files from The Canadian Press, CBC News
>
> https://www.jccf.ca/alberta-court-jails-pastor-coates-through-to-may-3-5-trial/
>
>
> Alberta court jails Pastor Coates through to May 3-5 trial
>
> Mar 5th, 2021
>
> EDMONTON: The Justice Centre is very disappointed to announce that
> Justice Peter Michalyshyn of the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench in
> Edmonton has ruled that Pastor James Coates of Grace Life Church must
> remain in jail for the next eight weeks pending his trial, unless he
> agrees to abide by health orders that violate his Charter freedoms of
> conscience, religion, expression, association and peaceful assembly.
>
> Pastor Coates has been in custody at the Edmonton Remand Centre since
> February 16, after he refused to sign a bail condition to comply with
> provincial health orders that violate his Charter freedoms of
> conscience, religion, expression, association and peaceful assembly.
>
> The Justice Centre filed an appeal in the Alberta Court of Queen’s
> Bench, to seek the release of Pastor Coates from jail prior to a trial
> date set for May 3-5, 2021, in Alberta Provincial Court in Stony
> Plain. The Justice Centre represents Pastor Coates and Grace Life
> Church, a large church just west of Edmonton. Alberta Health Services
> (AHS) ticketed Pastor Coates, taken Grace Life and Pastor Coates to
> court, and even attempted to completely shut the Church down.
> Background information on Pastor Coates’ ordeal is available here.
>
> “A trial set eight weeks down the road was too long for an innocent
> Pastor to be in jail. Pastor Coates is a peaceful Christian minister.
> He should never have been required to violate his conscience and
> effectively stop pastoring his church as a condition to be released.
> In every way this was a violation of Pastor Coates’ Charter rights and
> freedoms,” states lawyer John Carpay, president of the Justice Centre.
>
> “Charter freedoms do not disappear because the government declares
> regular church services to be outlawed while allowing hundreds of
> people to fill their local Walmarts,” notes Carpay.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 20:22:43 -0400
> Subject: Fwd: Yo Patrick King trust that Billy Blair the RCMP the
> Edmonton Cops and legions of other cops on both sides of the Medicine
> Line know my number is 902 800 0369 and some know my personal Cell
> number
> To: edmonton@globalnews.ca, Kris.Berezanski@edmonton.ca,
> Carly.Robinson@citytv.rogers.com
> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, office@gracelife.ca
>
> Artur Pawlowski
> 1740 – 25a Street SW
> Calgary Alberta
> T3C 1J9
>
> Phone Number: 403-607-4434
> E-mail us: art@streetchurch.ca
>
>
>
> https://globalnews.ca/news/7652604/feb-20-walk-for-freedom-covid-19/
>
> Protesters gather from across the province at Alberta legislature to
> fight COVID-19 health measures
> By Allison Bench Global News
> Posted February 20, 2021 2:29 pm
>
> https://edmonton.citynews.ca/
>
> GraceLife church at full capacity for another Sunday service, RCMP on
> location
> EDMONTON (CityNews) – A church just west of Edmonton that has been
> defying public-health guidelines held another packed service on
> Sunday. The GraceLife church in Parkland County was at full...
> 660 NEWS STAFF
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:44:21 -0400
> Subject: Yo Patrick King trust that Billy Blair the RCMP the Edmonton
> Cops and legions of other cops on both sides of the Medicine Line know
> my number is 902 800 0369 and some know my personal Cell number
> To: "Paul.Lynch" <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
> <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
> "martin.gaudet" <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, kingpatrick278
> <kingpatrick278@gmail.com>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, "Bill.Blair"
> <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>
>
> Here proof of acorrupt cop calling me recently after he falsely
> arrested a friend of mine in front of Premeir Higgy's house
>
> https://archive.org/details/rothesay-cops
>
> You just talked to the chicken who made this video Correct?
>
> https://www.bitchute.com/video/eat7Meo7M6Bw/
>
> Scroll down and enjoy the rest of this email
>
> My cell is 506 434 8433 now that you know it too Perhaps you should
> call me ASAP before anyone else gets arrested???
>
> Ya gotta love ethical computers Hence their owners can never cclaim
> that they don't now the awful truth about themselves
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 16:01:19 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks your minions in the RCMP and your
> buddy Jason Kenney would be upset if Patrick King of Wexit and I had a
> little Pow Wow today EH Billy Blair?
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
> Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
>
> Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
> constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
> further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
> office hours, both over the phone and via email.
>
> Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
> office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
> our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
> are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
> your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
> MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en
>
> Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
> your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
> volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
>
> Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus>
>
> Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
> as possible.
>
> Best,
>
>
> MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
> Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
> Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>
> **
> Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
> Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
>
> Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
> s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
> en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
> services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
> que par courrier ?lectronique.
>
> En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
> classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
> et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
> Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
> veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
> trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
> site:https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr
>
> En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
> votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
> extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
> courrier ?lectronique.
>
> Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
> site : http://www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus
>
> Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.
>
> Cordialement,
>
> Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
> Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
> Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
> < mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Office of the Premier <Premier@gov.ab.ca>
> Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 16:02:41 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks your minions in the RCMP and your
> buddy Jason Kenney would be upset if Patrick King of Wexit and I had a
> little Pow Wow today EH Billy Blair?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for contacting the Premier of Alberta.
>
> A state of public health emergency remains in effect in Alberta. For
> the latest and most accurate information related to the COVID-19
> response, visit alberta.ca/covid19<http://www.alberta.ca/covid-19> and
> canada.ca/covid-19<https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/coronavirus-disease-covid-19.html>.
>
> Workplace guidance and supports to help businesses and non-profits
> affected by COVID-19 are available at
> www.alberta.ca/biz-connect<https://www.alberta.ca/biz-connect.aspx>.
>
> For information about the Critical Worker Benefit, visit
> www.alberta.ca/critical-worker-benefit<https://www.alberta.ca/critical-worker-benefit.aspx>.
> To connect with program staff, email
> cwb@gov.ab.ca<mailto:cwb@gov.ab.ca>.
>
> Stay safe.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Office of the Mayor <TheMayor@calgary.ca>
> Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 16:00:55 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: [EXT] Methinks your minions in the RCMP and
> your buddy Jason Kenney would be upset if Patrick King of Wexit and I
> had a little Pow Wow today EH Billy Blair?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Hello,
> Thank-you for taking the time to share your concerns and feedback with
> the Mayor's Office. Our team reviews all incoming messages to
> determine what assistance or information we might be able to provide.
> Requests for City services (i.e., bylaw concerns, water services,
> etc.) are best handled by the City’s 311 service. For the most
> efficient response, please reach out directly to
> 311<https://www.calgary.ca/cfod/csc/311.html> - 24 hours a day, 7 days
> a week!
> **It is important to note what each level of government is responsible
> for as it relates to Covid questions/concerns. Each of these links has
> the latest up-to-date information available:
>
> *
> Municipal/Calgary<https://www.calgary.ca/csps/cema/covid19/response-to-coronavirus.html><https://www.calgary.ca/csps/cema/covid19/response-to-coronavirus.html>
> *
> <https://www.calgary.ca/csps/cema/covid19/response-to-coronavirus.html>
> Provincial/Alberta<https://www.alberta.ca/enhanced-public-health-measures.aspx><https://www.alberta.ca/enhanced-public-health-measures.aspx>
> *
> Federal/Canada<https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/coronavirus-disease-covid-19.html>
> To get information to you faster, these links may provide the
> information you’re reaching out about:
>
> * Plus 15s Partially Open-Map and
> Information<https://www.calgary.ca/transportation/roads/road-maintenance/bridge-rehabilitation/plus15skywalk.html>
> * Vulnerable Citizen Assistance-DOAP Team
> Contact<https://mail.calgary.ca/owa/>
> * Chinook Blast!<https://www.chinookblast.ca/>
> * Snow
> Concerns<https://www.calgary.ca/cfod/csc/snow.html?redirect=/snow>
> * Call 811 - Isolation Options,
> etc.<https://www.albertahealthservices.ca/findhealth/service.aspx?Id=1001957&facilityId=1011654>
> * Property Tax Assessment Details/Customer Review Period ending
> March 23,
> 2021<https://www.calgary.ca/pda/assessment/crp-understanding-property-value.html>
> The Office of the Mayor
> Calgary Municipal Building
> 800 Macleod Trail SE
> P.O. Box 2100, Station M, #8069
> Calgary, AB, Canada T2P 2M5
> *The City of Calgary supports a safe and respectful work environment
> where trust and respect are expected of our employees and its
> citizens. Abuse of any kind (profanity, threats, etc.) will not be
> tolerated.*
>
> <https://www.calgary.ca/citycouncil/mayor/Pages/home.aspx>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
> Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 16:02:40 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks your minions in the RCMP and your
> buddy Jason Kenney would be upset if Patrick King of Wexit and I had a
> little Pow Wow today EH Billy Blair?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
>
> Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
> that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
> understanding.
>
> If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
> visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.
>
> If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
> (506) 453-2144.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Bonjour,
>
> Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
>
> Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
> quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
> Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
>
> Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
> veuillez visiter
> www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.
>
> S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
> Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
>
> Merci.
>
>
> Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
> P.O Box/C. P. 6000
> Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick
> E3B 5H1
> Canada
> Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
> Email/Courriel:
> premier@gnb.ca/premierministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>
>
> FYI This me debating years ago while CBC denied it and that fact I was
> suing the Crown at the very same point in time
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>
> Trust that I don't believe what people say of you
>
> https://medium.com/@CanjeevaramSiva/is-pat-king-defendable-82f3f99ae4c6
>
> Is Pat King Defendable?
> Siva Canjeevaram
>
> Siva Canjeevaram
>
> Sep 22, 2020·6 min read
>
> Who is Pat King? Probably half of Alberta and all of Red Deer know him
> by now, and probably remember watching this video “This is going to
> happen very soon, and if you are going to come into my rural
> communities, I am going to be this big guy in the White Shirt,
> ready..” and shows a video of what it appears to be an ANTIFA
> protester beaten by a big burly guy
>
> https://dailyhive.com/calgary/rcmp-investigating-violence-anti-racism-rally-red-deer?auto=true
>
> RCMP investigating violence at anti-racism rally in Red Deer
> Chandler Walter
> |
> Sep 23 2020, 9:56 am
>
> https://globalnews.ca/news/6119387/edmonton-wexit-support/
>
> Hundreds gather for Wexit rally in Edmonton as group’s leader pens
> letter to Jason Kenney
> By Allison Bench Global News
> Posted November 2, 2019 9:35 pm
>
> #Wexit Founders Are Far-Right Conspiracy Theorists
> VoteWexit.com creator Peter Downing is an ex-cop who thinks PM Justin
> Trudeau is “normalizing pedophilia.”
> SZ
> by Steven Zhou
>
>
> https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/entry/wexit-alberta-separatism-red-deer_ca_5deeb964e4b00563b8561e08
>
> My Hometown Is The Epicentre Of Wexit. I Went Back To Find Out Why
> Alberta’s problematic past and separatist movement collide in Red Deer.
>
> By Mel Woods
>
>
>
>
> https://edmonton.ctvnews.ca/alberta-pastor-charged-with-violating-public-health-act-still-in-custody-for-refusing-conditions-rcmp-1.5313426?cache=%3FclipId%3D104069
>
> Alberta pastor charged with violating Public Health Act, still in
> custody for refusing conditions: RCMP
>
> Diego Romero
> CTVNewsEdmonton.ca Digital Journalist
>
> Published Wednesday, February 17, 2021 5:32PM MST
>
> EDMONTON -- A pastor west of Edmonton remains in custody Wednesday
> after he was charged with breaking Alberta's Public Health Act and
> refusing to agree to the conditions of his release, RCMP said.
>
> James Coates turned himself in to police on Tuesday, two days after a
> service Alberta Health Services and RCMP attended where he "was not
> complying with his Undertaking release conditions" issued a week
> earlier, police said.
>
> The pastor was charged with two counts of contravention of the Public
> Health Act and failing to comply with a condition of his undertaking.
> Related Stories
>
> GraceLife pastor accused of defying health orders turns himself in
> to police: lawyer
> Details of investigation into GraceLife Church expected mid-week
> as church continues to operate
> Alta. faith leaders call on church to follow public health rules
> Pastor of church west of Edmonton charged after failing to heed
> closure order
> Alta. church calls defiance of public health orders 'practical,'
> 'not theological'
> Alberta church opens on Sunday despite closure order over COVID-19
> violations
>
> Coates attended a bail hearing Tuesday and was to be released on
> conditions, but was kept in custody overnight "after refusing to agree
> to those conditions," RCMP said.
>
> Those conditions, his lawyer told CTV News, include stopping church
> services, but "Coates could not, in good conscience, agree to that
> condition."
>
> The pastor made a court appearance on Wednesday and was given a second
> court appearance for next Wednesday after he continued to refuse to
> agree to the conditions, Mounties added.
>
> “We’ve been consistent in our approach of escalated levels of
> enforcement with Pastor Coates, and we were hopeful to resolve this
> issue in a different manner,” said RCMP Insp. Mike Lokken. “The
> Pastor’s actions, and the subsequent effects those actions could have
> on the health and safety of citizens, dictated our response in this
> situation.”
>
> On Tuesday, Coates' lawyer told CTV News his client was willing to go
> to jail in order to do the "right thing."
>
> "His first obedience is to his Lord, is to his God. And normally,
> obeying Jesus and obeying the government go right in hand," James
> Kitchen said. "The government's forcing him in to a position where he
> has to choose between disobeying God and obeying government, or
> obeying God and disobeying government."
>
> GraceLife was first cited for hosting more than 15 per cent of its
> capacity at a December service and the pastor was fined $1,200.
>
> A Court of Queen's Bench order was issued in January when it continued
> to break COVID-19 restrictions.
>
> GraceLife has held services for three consecutive weeks after it was
> ordered to close at the end of January.
>
> The church was not in compliance with the Public Health Act last
> Sunday, RCMP said Wednesday.
>
> A day earlier in a statement, GraceLife said: "We do not see our
> actions as perpetuating the longevity of COVID-19 or any other virus
> that will inevitably come along. If anything, we see our actions as
> contributing to its end – the end of destructive lockdowns and the end
> of the attempt to institutionalize the debilitating fear of viral
> infections. Our local church is clear evidence that governmental
> lockdowns are unnecessary. In fact, it is also evidence of how harmful
> they are."
>
> Criminal lawyer Tom Engel says the RCMP should shut down the church
> and charge everyone in attendance.
>
> "Every person who is in that church knows that they are breaking the
> law," he said.
>
> 'UNCOMMONLY GOOD' RELATIONSHIP WITH RCMP: KITCHEN
>
> Coates' lawyer told CTV News GraceLife has an "uncommonly good"
> relationship with the RCMP because "the police have acted, in this
> case, very differently than how they have acted with a lot of other
> people."
>
> Complicating Kitchen's claim is the fact that a retired Mountie, Paul
> Claassen, is GraceLife's chair.
>
> "It leads to the impression that there's a double standard, there's a
> bias in favour of this church," Engel said.
>
> But in a statement, Insp. Lokken said: "Our response to the non
> compliance of the Church has been consistent with our overall RCMP
> strategy in the Province which is; education, an opportunity for
> compliance, and lastly, enforcement. Parkland RCMP has managed the
> investigation into the GraceLife Church with absolutely no influence
> from any member of their administration or congregation, regardless of
> any past or present affiliation with our organization.
>
> "The RCMP has conducted all their interactions with the Church in an
> impartial, professional, and respectful manner.”
>
> With files from CTV News Edmonton's Bill Fortier and Alex Antoneshyn
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 12:14:05 -0400
> Subject: Fwd: RE Justice Camp malicious nonsense versus the RCMP,
> Peter MacKay Federal Court, the Canadian Judicial Council and its
> cover up of the Monumental Newfy sexual abuse issues
> To: JKitchen <JKitchen@jccf.ca>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 12:21:36 -0400
> Subject: RE Justice Camp malicious nonsense versus the RCMP, Peter
> MacKay Federal Court, the Canadian Judicial Council and its cover up
> of the Monumental Newfy sexual abuse issues
> To: nicole.ireland@cbc.ca, meghan.grant@cbc.ca, awoolley@ucalgary.ca,
> koshan@ucalgary.ca, elaine.craig@dal.ca, elyn.downie@dal.ca,
> "Kathleen.Ganley" <Kathleen.Ganley@assembly.ab.ca>, investigations
> <investigations@cbc.ca>, cbcinvestigates <cbcinvestigates@cbc.ca>,
> gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>, alison.crawford@cbc.ca, jcarpay
> <jcarpay@jccf.ca>, HAnglin <HAnglin@theccf.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "Ian.McPhail"
> <Ian.McPhail@cpc-cpp.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "bill.pentney"
> <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, faddario@addario.ca, info@cjc-ccm.gc.ca,
> "william.brooks" <william.brooks@fja-cmf.gc.ca>, "PETER.MACKAY"
> <PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com>
>
> Judge Robin Camp's rape remarks led to appeal before Peter MacKay promoted
> him
> Judge asked woman in sex assault case why she didn't just keep her
> knees together
> By Alison Crawford, CBC News Posted: Nov 18, 2015 5:00 AM ET
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/judge-robin-camp-knees-together-1.3322867
>
> Robin Camp, who berated sex assault complainant, says counselling will
> make him a better judge
> Federal Court justice will fight to keep his job at judicial council
> hearing in September
> By Alison Crawford, CBC News Posted: Jul 04, 2016 12:40 PM ET
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/judge-sex-assault-robin-camp-1.3663552
>
> Judge Robin Camp's 'insensitive, rude' comments not grounds for
> dismissal: lawyer
> Inquiry will determine if Camp has been remediated or should be
> removed from office
> By Meghan Grant, CBC News Posted: Sep 06, 2016 1:57 PM MT
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/robin-camp-judge-inquiry-calgary-1.3750135
>
>
> FRANK ADDARIO
> Phone 1.416.649.5055
> faddario@addario.ca
>
>
>
> https://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/inquiries/goudge/pws/pdf/03/Frank_Addario_CLA.pdf
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/mariitime-and-yankee-arseholes.html
>
> July 31st, 2005
>
> Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin,
> C/o Norman Sabourin General Counsel and
> Andrew Grant and Renée Maria Tremblay
> Canadian Judicial Council
> 150 Metcalfe Street,
> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W8
>
> Shirley Heafey Chair of Commission
> for Public Complaints against the RCMP
> P.O. Box 3423 Station "D"
> Ottawa, ON K1P 6L4
>
> RE: Rampant Public Corruption
>
> Hey,
>
> Pursuant to my recent phone calls to Norman Sabourin and various
> underlings of Shirley Heafey within the Commission for Public
> Complaints against the RCMP over the years plus my many faxes and
> emails please find enclosed exactly the same material received by
> every Attorney General in Canada over the past year. The CD which is a
> copy of a police surveillance wiretap tape # 139 is served upon you as
> officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.
> As you can see I have enclosed a copy of a letter sent to the latest
> Attorney General Mr. Wally Opal in BC. Perhaps he should take a little
> trip to Surrey and ask your office some hard questions. Perhaps the
> ghost of my fellow Independent politician, Chuck Cadman may wish to
> answer few questions now as well. Hard telling not knowing.
>
> I will not bother you with the details of what I am sending to
> you byway of the certified US Mail because I will be serving identical
> material to many other Canadian Authorities in hand and tell them I
> gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy of this letter. All
> that is important to me right now is that I secure proof that this
> mail was sent before I make my way back home to the Maritimes. However
> I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material than what
> Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact the same
> material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky Boy McKenna in
> particular received, while I was up home running for Parliament last
> year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so I have also
> included a few recent items to spice thing up for you. I am tired of
> trying to convince people employed in law enforcement to uphold the
> law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own conscience and be
> careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest
> assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse
> to the law or me.
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David R. Amos
> 153 Alvin Ave
> Milton, MA. 02186
>
> Label/Receipt Number: ED71 7170 484U S
> Detailed Results:
>
>
> Delivered Abroad, August 11, 2005, 6:49 am, CANADA
> Out of Foreign Customs, August 08, 2005, 2:37 pm, CANADA
> Into Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
> Arrived Abroad, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
> International Dispatch, August 03, 2005, 8:32 am, KENNEDY AMC
> Enroute, August 03, 2005, 8:30 am, JAMAICA, NY 11499
> Acceptance, August 02, 2005, 10:40 am, QUINCY, MA 02169
>
>
>
> "Heafey, Shirley" HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca wrote:
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Heafey, Shirley"HeafeyS@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
> Sent: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:10:00 -0400
> To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> Subject: Re: Just so you know
>
>
> Just so you know, there was no message attached to the e-mail sent to
> me. SO, in fact, I don't know what you think I should now know. Try
> again.
> SH
>
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/judge-removal-canadian-judicial-council-1.3314962
>
> Robin Camp case: What does it take to remove a judge from the bench?
> Only two federally appointed judges recommended for dismissal since 1971
>
> By Nicole Ireland, CBC News Posted: Nov 12, 2015 5:00 AM ET
>
> The case of a judge who asked a woman, "Why couldn't you just keep
> your knees together?" during an Alberta sexual assault trial is
> raising questions about what kind of behaviour warrants removing a
> justice from the bench.
>
> Judge under review for berating sex assault complainant
> Read the complaint against Justice Robin Camp
>
> Only two judges have been recommended for removal by the Canadian
> Judicial Council — a group of federally appointed judges tasked with
> investigating complaints about their peers — since it was created in
> 1971.
> Trevor Farrow
>
> Trevor Farrow, associate dean at Osgoode Hall Law School in Toronto,
> says it's 'a good thing' that judges don't lightly recommend
> dismissing their peers. (Osgoode Hall Law School)
>
> In both cases, the judges resigned before the recommendations made it
> to Parliament, which ultimately decides whether or not to dismiss a
> Canadian judge.
>
> On Monday, the judicial council announced it was reviewing the conduct
> of Robin Camp while he was an Alberta provincial court judge in 2014,
> when he presided over a case involving a 19-year-old woman who alleged
> she was sexually assaulted by a Calgary man during a house party.
>
> According to the complaint that prompted the review, in addition to
> the "keep your knees together" comment, Camp asked during the trial,
> "Why didn't you just sink your bottom down into the basin so he
> couldn't penetrate you?" (The woman alleged she was sexually assaulted
> over a sink).
>
> "At numerous points during the proceeding, Justice Camp was dismissive
> of, if not contemptuous towards, the substantive law of sexual assault
> and the rules of evidence," the complaint said. "In particular, he
> showed disregard, if not disdain, for the rape shield provisions under
> the Criminal Code, the legal definition of consent to sexual touching,
> and the Criminal Code provision and case law regarding the doctrine of
> recent complaint.
>
> "His articulated disrespect for these legal rules was, in some
> instances, combined with a refusal to apply them."
>
> The Canadian Judicial Council must decide whether the complaint
> against Camp, now a Federal Court judge, has merit and, if so, whether
> it warrants the establishment of a review panel that could call a
> public inquiry.
>
> In the last four decades, the judicial council has ordered public
> inquiries for 11 complaints against judges. Two of those inquiries are
> still ongoing. In some cases, the judge resigned before the inquiry
> was complete. For example, the late Judge Robert Flahiff was convicted
> in 1999 for laundering money for a drug dealer back in the 1980s,
> before he became a judge. He resigned before the judicial council
> finished its inquiry.
>
> Former Quebec judge convicted of money laundering dies
> Convicted Quebec judge resigns
>
> In other cases, the council recommended that the judges involved not
> be removed from the bench — even if there had been inappropriate
> conduct.
>
> "It's not a fait accompli that if you have engaged in some kind of
> misconduct you should be removed from office," said Norman Sabourin,
> the Canadian Judicial Council's executive director, in an interview
> with CBC News on Tuesday. "Assessing the gravity of a misconduct is a
> difficult exercise."
> Media placeholder
>
> Canadian Judicial Council exec on review of judge's behaviour7:06
>
> The overarching question in making that determination, the council
> said, is whether the judge has the required confidence of the public
> to continue to preside in court.
>
> So when has the council recommended that a judge be removed? Here are
> the two cases in which that happened. The details come from documents
> available on the Canadian Judicial Council's website:
>
> Paul Cosgrove, Ontario Superior Court
>
> On April 22, 2004, Ontario's attorney general at the time, Michael
> Bryant, asked the council to consider whether Judge Paul Cosgrove
> should be removed from office based on his conduct in the murder trial
> of Julia Yvonne Elliott.
>
> The attorney general said Cosgrove had ordered an "unwarranted stay"
> of proceedings.
>
> Ontario judge resigns over misconduct
>
> "The proceedings tarnished the administration of justice and turned
> into an exercise of vilifying the state built on irrelevant,
> inappropriate and harmful findings," Bryant wrote. "The proceedings
> trivialized the charter and deprived society and the victim's family
> of any semblance of justice."
>
> The attorney general's complaint alleged that Cosgrove had
> demonstrated similar behaviour in other court cases, citing Court of
> Appeal findings that the judge had "reduced the proceedings to a
> 'procedural nightmare' for the Crown" and shown a "suspicious attitude
> toward the government that caused him to misapprehend some of the
> evidence before him."
>
> On March 30, 2009, after a public inquiry, the Canadian Judicial
> Council recommended that Cosgrove be removed from office. The judge
> resigned the following month.
>
> Jean Bienvenue, Superior Court of Quebec
>
> In December 1995, the then attorneys general of Quebec and Canada,
> Paul Bégin and Allan Rock, asked the Canadian Judicial Council for a
> public inquiry into the conduct of Judge Jean Bienvenue during the
> trial of Tracy Théberge, who was convicted of second-degree murder in
> death of her husband.
>
> According to the inquiry report, Bienvenue made offensive comments
> about Jewish victims of the Holocaust and about women while sentencing
> the accused.
>
> "It is said that when women ascend the scale of virtues, they reach
> higher than men, and I have always believed this. And it is also said,
> and this too I believe, that when they decide to degrade themselves,
> they sink to depths to which even the vilest man could not sink,"
> Bienvenue said.
>
> The judge also said: "At the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp in
> Poland, which I once visited horror-stricken, even the Nazis did not
> eliminate millions of Jews in a painful or bloody manner. They died in
> the gas chambers, without suffering."
>
> During the inquiry, Bienvenue argued that he had not meant to be
> offensive and that he had met with the Canadian Jewish Congress. He
> also issued a statement apologizing to women offended by his remarks.
>
> On June 25, 1996, four out of five members of the Canadian Judicial
> Council committee recommended that Bienvenue be removed from office.
> They wrote, "We believe that if Mr. Justice Bienvenue were to preside
> over a case, a reasonable and informed person... would have a
> reasonable apprehension that the judge would not execute his office
> with the objectivity, impartiality and independence that the public is
> entitled to expect from a judge."
>
> Bienvenue resigned before the recommendation went to Parliament.
>
> What does the low number of removals mean?
>
> The rarity of judges removing their peers from the bench is a
> reflection of the value Canada places on an independent judiciary,
> said Trevor Farrow, a professor and associate dean at Osgoode Hall Law
> School in Toronto.
>
> "Judges don't recommend removal lightly," he said. "That's a good
> thing when you're balancing the requirement that judges have the
> courage and independence to make tough choices in often really
> challenging circumstances that involve vulnerable people."
>
> At the same time, Farrow said, it's important that the Canadian
> Judicial Council has "the power to recommend sanctions, including
> removal if warranted, to maintain the public's trust and confidence."
>
> With files from Kathleen Harris, Alison Crawford and The Canadian Press
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/robin-camp-judge-close-knees-inquiry-1.3743554
>
> Federal Court judge Robin Camp faces inquiry over sexual assault trial
> conduct
> 7-day public hearing will determine if judge who referred to rape
> victim as 'the accused' can remain on bench
> By Meghan Grant, CBC News Posted: Aug 31, 2016 6:15 PM MT
>
> An inquiry begins Tuesday afternoon for a judge, formerly with Alberta
> provincial court, who is facing dismissal from the Federal Court over
> controversial comments directed at a sexual assault complainant in
> 2014.
>
> Judge Robin Camp's 'insensitive, rude' comments not grounds for
> dismissal: lawyer
>
> The public hearing takes place before a panel of five — three superior
> court judges and two senior lawyers — over the next week-and-a-half at
> the Westin Hotel in downtown Calgary.
>
> "These are public hearings, they're open and they're transparent,"
> said Johanna Laporte with the Canadian Judicial Council (CJC).
>
> "The council recognizes that public confidence in the justice system
> can only be enhanced by these open proceedings and it's the council's
> mandate to ensure that serious matters involving judges are thoroughly
> investigated."
>
> Robin Camp, who berated sex assault complainant, says counselling
> will make him a better judge
> Inquiry into Judge Robin Camp to hear from advocates for sex assault
> victims
>
> Alberta Attorney General Kathleen Ganley forced the inquiry in January
> after a complaint made by two law professors at the University of
> Calgary and Dalhousie University.
>
> After opening remarks by presenting counsel and Camp's lawyer,
> intervenors — women's groups and sexual assault centres — will make
> submissions and finally, the panel will hear from Camp himself, who
> has previously indicated he plans to apologize.
>
> Panel members will then deliberate before releasing a decision —
> likely in written form — on whether or not Camp should remain on the
> bench at the Federal Court.
>
> "The inquiry is squarely tasked with determining if the facts
> surrounding the complaint are serious enough to warrant the judge's
> removal," said Laporte.
> 'Why didn't you just sink your bottom down'
>
> During the 2014 trial, Camp asked the complainant "why couldn't you
> just keep your knees together" during her testimony in his role as an
> Alberta Provincial Court judge.
>
> The then 19-year-old woman alleged she was raped by Alexander Scott
> Wagar over a bathroom sink at a Calgary house party. Throughout the
> trial, Camp repeatedly referred to her as "the accused."
>
> "Why didn't you just sink your bottom down into the basin so he
> couldn't penetrate you?" Camp asked the woman.
>
> "That kind of comment goes back to the dinosaur age as far as I'm
> concerned," said Danielle Aubry with Calgary Communities Against
> Sexual Abuse.
>
> Camp acquitted Wagar, but the Alberta Court of Appeal overturned the
> ruling and ordered a new trial. By that time, Camp had been elevated
> to the Federal Court.
>
> "When you become a judge ... that's a privilege, it's a very high
> position," said Aubry.
>
> "It's incredulous to me that there are people sitting on the bench
> that are not educating themselves about issues like sexual violence."
>
> In ordering a new trial, the Court of Appeal wrote that the judge's
> comments raised doubts about his understanding of sexual assault laws.
>
> The Canadian Judicial Council received the initial complaint from four
> law professors at Dalhousie University and the University of Calgary.
> After that, dozens more flooded in.
> Gender and sensitivity training
>
> In his notice of response posted to the CJC website, Camp indicated
> that he agrees his comments were "insensitive and inappropriate," but
> says he has undergone gender and sensitivity training.
>
> Camp arranged and paid for his sensitivity training himself, during
> which he worked with a Superior Court judge, a psychologist and an
> expert on the law of sexual assault.
>
> He has indicated that he wishes to remain a judge.
>
> The council members include Justice Austin Cullen, who will act as
> chairperson, Justice Deborah Smith and Justice Raymond Whalen. The two
> senior lawyers, Karen Jensen and Cynthia Petersen, were appointed by
> the federal justice minister.
>
> Since the CJC was created in 1971, only two judges have been
> recommended for removal. but both ultimately resigned before
> Parliament, which has the final say, made its decision.
>
> Seven days have been set aside for the hearing but it is not expected
> to run its allotted time. On Tuesday, it starts at 2 p.m. MT. but will
> begin at 9 a.m. MT otherwise.
>
>
>
> Yea right tell me another one just like your former boss Landslide did.
>
> Tuesday, November 28, 2006
>
> OTTAWA — Anne McLellan has added her name to the list of former
> Liberal cabinet ministers who say they were not fully briefed by the
> RCMP on Maher Arar.
>
> McLellan was appointed public safety minister in December 2003 and,
> shortly thereafter, called a judicial inquiry into the case.
>
> This fall, Justice Dennis O'Connor concluded the RCMP passed
> inaccurate information to the United States on Arar that likely led to
> his detention and torture in Syria.
>
> On Tuesday, McLellan confirmed she was briefed on the "Arar situation"
> by RCMP Commissioner Giuliano Zaccardelli and former CSIS director
> Ward Elcock.
>
> But she said she only learned that the RCMP had passed along false
> information on Arar to the U.S. when the O'Connor report was released
> in late September.
>
> The RCMP described Arar to U.S. authorities as an Islamic extremist
> suspected of ties to al-Qaida, even though he was never more than a
> "person of interest" in an RCMP national-security investigation.
>
> "In my presence, (neither) Commissioner Zaccardelli, nor anyone else,
> either from the RCMP or CSIS, (ever) referred to Mr. Arar as an
> Islamic extremist," McLellan told a Commons public safety committee
> that has been probing the Arar affair.
>
> "That was an expression that was never used in relation to Mr. Arar in
> my presence. Ever."
>
> McLellan's statements appear to contradict assertions by Zaccardelli
> that he briefed the government about the mistakes by the RCMP.
>
> In an appearance before the same committee in late September,
> Zaccardelli said he informed former solicitor general Wayne Easter
> about the errors. The solicitor general was the minister in charge of
> the RCMP before the position was abolished last year.
>
> But last month, Easter testified that he was never so informed.
>
> "There is no situation where the RCMP came to me and basically said,
> 'We screwed up. We provided improper information,’” he said at the
> time.
>
> Earlier this month, Elcock of CSIS also testified he did not learn of
> the RCMP's mislabeling of Arar until after the O'Connor report was
> released.
>
> On Tuesday, McLellan described an environment in which concern about
> the Arar affair reached to the top of the political ladder.
>
> She said that soon after former prime minister Paul Martin took office
> in December 2003, he asked her to "get to the bottom of what had
> happened to Mr. Arar."
>
> Ottawa Citizen
>
>
> That was what Landslide Annie had to say about the RCMP before Dion
> was picked as leader of the liberals aweek or so ago. Ask me what I
> sent Wayne Easter as Paul Martin was being crowned as Humpty Dumpty
> three years ago. Clearly I sent something EH?
>
> Jan 3rd, 2004
> Mr. David R. Amos
> 153 Alvin Avenue
> Milton, MA 02186
> U.S.A.
>
> Dear Mr. Amos
> Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to my
> predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding your safety. I
> apologize for the delay in responding.
> If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
> suggest that you contact the police of local jurisdiction. In
> addition, any evidence of criminal activity should be brought to their
> attention since the police are in the best position to evaluate the
> information and take action as deemed appropriate.
> I trust that this information is satisfactory.
>
> Yours sincerely
> A. Anne McLellan
>
> David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com wrote:
> Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 16:21:24 -0800 (PST)
> From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> Subject: Within this email is the proof that Shirley Heafey and
> everybody else is a liar
> To: info@bccla.org, jsliter@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> CC: giuliano.zaccardelli@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, rod.smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, cnichols@norwellpolice.com,
> info@pco-bcp.gc.ca
>
> http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Canada/2006/12/06/2654646-cp.html
>
> "McLellan, Anne - M.P." McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca wrote:
> Subject: RE: Re: Lets all go through the looking glass to check the
> Integrity of the Talking Heads in BC tonight
> Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 15:45:08 -0500
> From: "McLellan, Anne - M.P." McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca
> To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> On behalf of Ms. McLellan I would like to thank you for your email
> message concerning the current federal election. I regret that the
> volume of messages prevented me from responding sooner.
>
> Your message has been brought to Ms. McLellan`s attention, as she is
> always pleased to receive comments, both positive and negative.
>
> Again, thank you for bringing this matter to Ms. McLellan`s attention.
>
> Sincerely,
> Kirsten Odynski
> Office of the Deputy Prime Minister
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> > > > From: "McKnight, Gisele" McKnight.Gisele@kingscorecord.com
>> > > > To: lcampenella@ledger.com
>> > > > Cc:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
>> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:53 PM
>> > > > Subject: David Amos
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hello Lisa,
>> > > > > David Amos asked me to contact you. I met him last June after he
>> > became
>> > > an
>> > > > > independent (not representing any political party) candidate in
>> > > > > our
>> > > > federal
>> > > > > election that was held June 28.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > He was a candidate in our constituency of Fundy (now called
>> > > Fundy-Royal).
>> > > > I
>> > > > > wrote a profile story about him, as I did all other candidates.
>> > > > > That
>> > > story
>> > > > > appeared in the Kings County Record June 22. A second story,
>> > > > > written
>> > by
>> > > > one
>> > > > > of my reporters, appeared on the same date, which was a report on
>> the
>> > > > > candidates' debate held June 18.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > As I recall David Amos came last of four candidates in the
>> > > > > election.
>> > The
>> > > > > winner got 14,997 votes, while Amos got 358.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I have attached the two stories that appeared, as well as a photo
>> > taken
>> > > by
>> > > > > reporter Erin Hatfield during the debate. I couldn't find the
>> > > > > photo
>> > that
>> > > > > ran, but this one is very similar.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Gisele McKnight
>> > > > > editor A1-debate A1-amos,David for MP 24.doc debate
> 2.JPG
>> > > > > Kings County Record
>> > > > > Sussex, New Brunswick
>> > > > > Canada
>> > > > > 506-433-1070
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
> Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd
>
> By Erin Hatfield
>
> "If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
> world is all screwed up, rearrange it."
>
> The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
> the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
> watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
> unofficial, theme song for the debate.
>
> The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
> they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
> Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
> chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
> left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
> mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
> the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.
>
> The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was
> organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage
> of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record
> and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.
>
> Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
> responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
> exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
> Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
> other on their answers and criticizing eachothers’ party leaders.
> Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
> questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic
> relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
> response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's
> getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."
>
> Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his
> party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but
> well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am
> on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better
> places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters
> shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.
>
> The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At
> one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in
> front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the
> voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According to
> Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and second
> readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted, at
> final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to
> register sex offenders rather than register the property of law
> abiding citizens."
>
> The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and
> women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman
> yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron
> spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.
>
> Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy
> Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You’re out of touch," Armstrong
> yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of
> post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged
> Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time,
> anyplace," Armstrong responded.
>
> As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate,
> candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and
> fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making
> process for the June 28 vote.
>
> Cutline – David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his
> favourite possessions—motorcycles.
>
> McKnight/KCR
>
> The Unconventional Candidate
>
> David Amos Isn’t Campaigning For Your Vote, But….
>
> By Gisele McKnight
>
> FUNDY—He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
> wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
> that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."
>
> Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot—David Amos.
>
> The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife
> and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from
> running for office in Canada.
>
> One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail
> to meet Elections Canada requirements.
>
> When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his
> favourite place to do so—Fundy.
>
> Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his
> dissatisfaction with politicians.
>
> "I’ve become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he
> said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."
>
> The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in
> 1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he
> needed to change his life.
>
> "I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that
> sometimes in midlife."
>
> So Amos, who’d lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners
> motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952
> Panhead motorcycle.
>
> "Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact)
> experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you
> renew your faith in mankind – you help anyone you can, you never ask
> for anything, but you take what they offer."
>
> For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs
> and conversation all over North America.
>
> Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son
> and a daughter and become a house-husband – Mr. Mom, as he calls
> himself.
>
> He also describes himself in far more colourful terms—a motorcyclist
> rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed
> individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud
> Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."
>
> Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his life.
>
> "But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said.
> "It’s alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"
>
> Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.
>
> "I didn’t appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door
> interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can
> call me. I’m not going to drive my opinions down their throats."
>
> And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.
>
> "I won’t take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It’s
> not about money. It goes against what I’m fighting about."
>
> What he’s fighting for is the discussion of issues – tainted blood,
> the exploitation of the Maritimes’ gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
> name a few.
>
> "The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs – fishing,
> farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I’m
> death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
> (NAFTA) out the window.
>
> NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
> easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.
>
> Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.
>
> "There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
> especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
> Don’t necessarily vote for me, but vote."
>
> Although…if you’re going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have
> your X by his name.
>
> "I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and
> say, ‘what the hell.’"
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 18:10:33 -0400
> Subject: YO Madame Trudeau I bet Andrea Johnson, Katie Telford and
> lots of other ladies agree that not everbody is fond of the PM or your
> pal Krissy Bay Austin either
> To: iloveblue.beth@gmail.com, "Katie.Telford"
> <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "michelle.conroy"
> <michelle.conroy@gnb.ca>, "Mitton, Megan (LEG)" <megan.mitton@gnb.ca>,
> "sherry.wilson" <sherry.wilson@gnb.ca>, "Margaret.Johnson"
> <Margaret.Johnson@gnb.ca>, "margot.cragg" <margot.cragg@umnb.ca>
> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, howard@galganov.com
>
> Canadians for Language Fairness media contact info:
>
> Beth Trudeau
>
> iloveblue.beth@gmail.com
>
> 613-443-2370 (home/office - best)
>
> 613-229-3236 (cell)
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 20:12:03 -0400
> Subject: RE Dissension within Higgy's ranks I bet Andrea Johnson
> agrees the mindless minions should not have teased Jeannot Volpé about
> his wife's golden handshake from NB Power EH Lenny Hoyt?
> To: "andrea.johnson" <andrea.johnson@pcnb.org>, "len.hoyt"
> <len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>, "andrea.anderson-mason"
> <andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>, "benoit.bourque"
> <benoit.bourque@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>,
> "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore"
> <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca>,
> jeff.carr@gnb.ca, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
> "robert.gauvin" <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee"
> <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, "Roger.Brown" <Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>,
> "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "Roger.L.Melanson"
> <roger.l.melanson@gnb.ca>, cpsnb@rogers.com, "Ginette.PetitpasTaylor"
> <Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.gc.ca>, "hugh.flemming"
> <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
> <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey"
> <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Mike.Comeau" <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>,
> "Jennifer.duggan" <Jennifer.duggan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, wharrison
> <wharrison@nbpower.com>, "Waycott, Stephen" <SWaycott@nbpower.com>,
> "Furey, John" <jfurey@nbpower.com>, "steve.murphy"
> <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>
> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Nathalie Sturgeon
> <sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, "Mark.Blakely"
> <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
> <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, "mary.wilson" <mary.wilson@gnb.ca>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/jeannot-volp%C3%A9-progressive-conservative-blaine-higgs-1.5901276
>
> Former PC finance minister says he'll quit party until Higgs steps
> down as leader
>
> Jeannot Volpé is no longer a Progressive Conservative and wants a
> leadership review
> Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Feb 04, 2021 4:01 PM AT
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 21:34:25 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Minister Bill Blair and Commmioner
> Brenda Lucki should expalin to the RCMP and their lawyers that I do
> not need their permission to complain about them N'esy Pas Franky Boy
> McKenna??
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
>
> Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
> that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
> understanding.
>
> If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
> visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.
>
> If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
> (506) 453-2144.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Bonjour,
>
> Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
>
> Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
> quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
> Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
>
> Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
> veuillez visiter
> www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.
>
> S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
> Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
>
> Merci.
>
>
> Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
> P.O Box/C. P. 6000
> Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick
> E3B 5H1
> Canada
> Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
> Email/Courriel:
> premier@gnb.ca/premierministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 21:31:11 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Minister Bill Blair and Commmioner
> Brenda Lucki should expalin to the RCMP and their lawyers that I do
> not need their permission to complain about them N'esy Pas Franky Boy
> McKenna??
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
> Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
>
> Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
> constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
> further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
> office hours, both over the phone and via email.
>
> Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
> office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
> our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
> are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
> your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
> MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en
>
> Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
> your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
> volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
>
> Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus>
>
> Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
> as possible.
>
> Best,
>
>
> MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
> Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
> Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>
> **
> Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
> Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
>
> Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
> s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
> en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
> services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
> que par courrier ?lectronique.
>
> En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
> classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
> et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
> Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
> veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
> trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
> site:https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr
>
> En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
> votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
> extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
> courrier ?lectronique.
>
> Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
> site : http://www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus
>
> Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.
>
> Cordialement,
>
> Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
> Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
> Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
> < mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>
>
> On 2/4/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
>> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 19:03:07 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Cardy lashes out at 'populist
>> foolishness' in debate over proposed child-care bill
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
>>
>> Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
>> that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
>> understanding.
>>
>> If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
>> visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.
>>
>> If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
>> (506) 453-2144.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>>
>> Bonjour,
>>
>> Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
>>
>> Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
>> quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
>> Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
>>
>> Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
>> veuillez visiter
>> www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.
>>
>> S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
>> Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
>>
>> Merci.
>>
>>
>> Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
>> P.O Box/C. P. 6000
>> Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick
>> E3B 5H1
>> Canada
>> Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
>> Email/Courriel:
>> premier@gnb.ca/premierministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Nathalie Sturgeon <sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>
>> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 19:24:04 -0700
>> Subject: Out of the office Re: Fwd: Attn Cst. Amy Sturgeon (506 856
>> 8148) Here is just some of what Irwin Lampert FAILED to tell you about
>> the RCMP and I
>> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>>
>> Thank you for your message.
>>
>> I am currently out of the office and not responding to emails at this
>> time.
>>
>> I will respond to any messages upon my return on Monday, Aug. 27.
>>
>> All the best,
>> Nathalie
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> *Nathalie Sturgeon *
>> Reporter, Telegraph-Journal | Brunswick News Inc.
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Mobile: 506-466-8150
>> sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com
>> https://tj.news
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 23:18:13 -0300
>> Subject: Fwd: Attn Cst. Amy Sturgeon (506 856 8148) Here is just some
>> of what Irwin Lampert FAILED to tell you about the RCMP and I
>> To: sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com, blaine.higgs@gnb.ca
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Jennifer Duggan <jennifer.duggan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 16:21:10 -0400
>> Subject: Re: Methinks even the RCMP should agree that it was really
>> low of CBC to allow Higgy's minions to tease me about my friend Kevin
>> after they barred me N'esy Pas Andrea Anderson-Mason???. (Out of
>> Office)
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I will be away from the office until August 31, 2020. Should you require
>> immediate assistance, please contact Judy Chan at 613-282-6659
>>
>> Je suis hors du bureau jusqu'au le 31 aout 2020, Si vous avez besoin
>> d'assistance immediate, veuilez appeler Judy Chan a 613-282-6659.
>>
>> Protected - Solicitor Client Privilege
>>
>>
>> Jennifer Duggan
>> Director and General Counsel /directrice et avocate générale
>> Department of Justice, RCMP Legal Services / Ministère de la Justice,
>> Services Juridiques, GRC
>> 73 Leikin Drive
>> Ottawa, ON K1A 0R2
>> Phone/Téléphone: 613-825-2981
>> Mobile /cellulaire: 613-816-4368
>> Email/Courriel:
>> jennifer.duggan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>>
>> This electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the
>> party(ies) to whom it is addressed. This message may contain
>> information that is privileged or confidential. Any use of the
>> information by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is
>> prohibited. If you receive this message in error, please notify the
>> sender immediately and delete both the original message and all copies.
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Ce courrier électronique est réservé à l'usage des personnes auxquelles
>> il s'adresse. Ce message peut contenir de l'information protégée ou
>> confidentielle. Toute utilisation de l'information par des personnes
>> autres que celles auxquelles il s'adresse est interdite. Si vous avez
>> reçu ce message par erreur, veuillez en aviser immédiatement
>> l'expéditeur et détruisez le message original ainsi que les copies.
>> Merci.
>>
>>>>> David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> 08/22/20 16:12 >>>
>>
>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/atlantic-bubble-new-brunswick-election-nova-scotia-1.5695975
>>
>> No changes to Atlantic bubble planned during the election, Higgs says
>> Nova Scotia says it could open up its borders even if the other
>> Atlantic provinces don't
>> Hadeel Ibrahim · CBC News · Posted: Aug 21, 2020 7:38 PM AT
>>
>>
>> 186 Comments
>>
>>
>> James Risdon
>> Premier Blaine Higgs can't change the Atlantic Bubble during the
>> election or he'll be skewered in the media.
>>
>> James Risdon
>> But this thing is pretty much purely political at this point. It's
>> just a question of which Atlantic Canadian premier blinks first and
>> breaks the Atlantic Bubble concept so that the other premiers can cave
>> while pointing the finger at someone else and escaping the political
>> heat for relaxing the regulations.
>>
>> James Risdon
>> Reply to @Kev of the Amos Clan: A) I have no boss. I am self-employed.
>> B) I have never tried to sell you anything. C) What in the world are
>> you talking about?
>>
>>
>> Reply to @Kev of the Amos Clan: What cookie jar? Do you read the stuff
>> you write?
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
>> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 08:16:38 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks fans and foes in CBC Higgy and
>> Vicky deserve each other just like those of Trudeau et al do N'esy Pas
>> Andrea Anderson-Mason???.
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>>
>>
>> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
>> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
>> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com
>>
>>
>> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
>> publiceditor@globeandmail.com
>>
>> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>>
>> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
>> press releases.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2020 09:44:54 -0300
>> Subject: Attn Cst. Amy Sturgeon (506 856 8148) Here is just some of
>> what Irwin Lampert FAILED to tell you about the RCMP and I
>> To: Amy.Sturgeon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, irwinlampert@gmail.com,
>> glemieux@lemcolaw.ca, "Larry.Tremblay"
>> <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Roger.Brown"
>> <Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca,
>> Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
>> "Barbara.Whitenect" <Barbara.Whitenect@gnb.ca>, "carl.urquhart"
>> <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
>> "barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Newsroom
>> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Nathalie Sturgeon
>> <sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
>> Friday.Joe@psic-ispc.gc.ca, "Shane.Magee" <Shane.Magee@cbc.ca>,
>> "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
>> Cc: Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Premier@ontario.ca,
>> Patricia.Levesque@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, motomaniac333
>> <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Whereas the RCMP, thier lawyers and their political bosses don't like
>> to read things perhaps they may enjoy reviewing some videos I made
>> after the Feds falsely arrested me and assaulted me the DECH in Fat
>> Fred City 2008
>>
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjonbmIti-o
>>
>> The RCMP in Fat Fred City Pt 1
>> 326 views
>> Oct 15, 2010
>> MaritimeMalaise
>>
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3IXzuc4QFLY
>>
>> RCMP in Fat Fred City Pt 2
>> 73 views
>> Oct 9, 2010
>> MaritimeMalaise
>>
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nq9WozWEyAI
>>
>> Speak of the Devil and Cst. Mark Blakely of the RCMP appears
>> 372 views
>> Oct 9, 2010
>> MaritimeMalaise
>>
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9tFll72Wcs
>>
>> A Clip of Yankee Police surveilance wiretap tape 139 Sgt Moe loved this
>> CD
>> 44 views
>> Oct 9, 2010
>> MaritimeMalaise
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:38:25 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
>> RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
>> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>>
>> Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
>> Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
>>
>> Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
>> constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
>> further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
>> office hours, both over the phone and via email.
>>
>> Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
>> office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
>> our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
>> are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
>> your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
>> MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en
>>
>> Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
>> your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
>> volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
>>
>> Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
>> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus>
>>
>> Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
>> as possible.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>
>> MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
>> Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
>> Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
>> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>>
>> **
>> Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
>> Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
>>
>> Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
>> s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
>> en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
>> services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
>> que par courrier ?lectronique.
>>
>> En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
>> classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
>> et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
>> Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
>> veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
>> trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
>> site:https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr
>>
>> En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
>> votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
>> extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
>> courrier ?lectronique.
>>
>> Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
>> site : http://www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus
>>
>> Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que
>> possible.
>>
>> Cordialement,
>>
>> Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
>> Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
>> Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
>> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>> < mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "Telford, Katie" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
>> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:38:24 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
>> RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Please note that I am currently away from the office.
>>
>> For any urgent matters during my absence, please contact Alex
>> Axiotis-Perez
>> (Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.gc.ca<mailto:Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>).
>>
>> ***
>>
>> Bonjour,
>>
>> Veuillez noter que je suis présentement absent du bureau.
>>
>> Pour toute question urgente pendant mon absence, veuillez contacter
>> Alex Axiotis-Perez
>> (Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.gc.ca<mailto:Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>).
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
>> <Premier@ontario.ca>
>> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:38:23 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
>> RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
>> valued.
>>
>> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
>> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>>
>> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
>> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
>> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
>> response may take several business days.
>>
>> Thanks again for your email.
>> ______
>>
>> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
>> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>>
>> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
>> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>>
>> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
>> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
>> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
>> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>>
>> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:43:41 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
>> RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>>
>> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
>> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
>> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com
>>
>> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
>> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>
>>
>> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>>
>> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
>> press releases.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 12:23:11 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Irwin Lampert Re what you and the RCMP say
>> in
>> CBC
>> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>>
>> Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
>> Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
>>
>> Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
>> constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
>> further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
>> office hours, both over the phone and via email.
>>
>> Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
>> office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
>> our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
>> are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
>> your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
>> MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en
>>
>> Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
>> your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
>> volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
>>
>> Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
>> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus>
>>
>> Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
>> as possible.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>
>> MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
>> Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
>> Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
>> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>>
>> **
>> Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
>> Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
>>
>> Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
>> s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
>> en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
>> services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
>> que par courrier ?lectronique.
>>
>> En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
>> classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
>> et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
>> Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
>> veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
>> trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
>> site:https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr
>>
>> En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
>> votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
>> extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
>> courrier ?lectronique.
>>
>> Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
>> site : http://www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus
>>
>> Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que
>> possible.
>>
>> Cordialement,
>>
>> Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
>> Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
>> Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
>> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>> < mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 09:17:08 -0300
>> Subject: Attn Irwin Lampert Re what you and the RCMP say in CBC
>> To: irwinlampert@gmail.com, glemieux@lemcolaw.ca, "Larry.Tremblay"
>> <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Roger.Brown"
>> <Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca,
>> Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
>> "Barbara.Whitenect" <Barbara.Whitenect@gnb.ca>, "carl.urquhart"
>> <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
>> "barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Newsroom
>> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Nathalie Sturgeon
>> <sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
>> "Friday.Joe" <Friday.Joe@psic-ispc.gc.ca>
>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Shane.Magee"
>> <Shane.Magee@cbc.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
>>
>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/rcmp-management-reviews-police-investigations-1.5670446
>>
>>
>> Internal RCMP reviews find illegal arrests, incomplete investigations
>>
>> Management reviews give previously hidden look at quality of RCMP
>> investigations
>> Shane Magee · CBC News · Posted: Aug 04, 2020 6:00 AM AT
>>
>> "Irwin Lampert, a provincial court judge in Moncton who retired last
>> year, said he would be surprised if some of the issues found in the
>> older reports continued to this day.
>>
>> "I saw very very few examples of police officers who would obviously
>> violate an accused's rights under the charter," Lampert said of his
>> time on the bench, referring to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
>>
>> "Some were through inadvertence rather than malfeasance. In some cases
>> they just didn't realize that they were doing something wrong and it
>> would be pointed out to them and you would hope that it wouldn't
>> happen again."
>>
>> New Brunswick is among three provinces where Crown prosecutors must
>> approve charges before they are laid in court.
>> Court issues
>>
>> A 2017 review of the Hampton detachment is generally favourable, but
>> describes prosecutions abandoned or dropped.
>>
>> In three of 45 cases brought to the Crown by police, the evidence
>> didn't support the charges. Issues with arrests in two of the 45 cases
>> led to the Crown not prosecuting. The report pointed to a lack of
>> supervision as a contributing factor.
>>
>> "When supervision is not taking place, solvable, prosecutable cases
>> could result in acquittals or charges forwarded when not warranted,
>> bringing liability to the organization and members," the report says."
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 30 Comments
>>
>>
>>
>> David Amos
>> Methinks the RCMP should also review my lawsuit N'esy Pas?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Bill Henry
>> I cannot think of a worse job than being a police officer. Working
>> nights, deaths, domestic violence, distrust in law enforcement, and
>> while trying to do your job the best you can, the very real
>> possibility you make a split second mistake, and you yourself end up
>> in jail the rest of your life!
>>
>> Terry Tibbs
>> Reply to @Bill Henry: Paperwork, and the lack of the proper paperwork,
>> could hardly be lumped in with split second mistaken decisions.
>>
>> Dan Moore
>> Reply to @Bill Henry: Yes, policing is a difficult job, if it is your
>> worst job don't become a police officer. We should demand only the
>> best suited become police officers and you clearly don't fit the bill.
>> Also be aware that in that 'split second' mistake that could end you
>> up in jail could also take the life of an innocent person as we have
>> seen happen in the US time and again though less so in Canada, it
>> still occurs. Being a police officer should not put you above the law
>> rather place you under greater scrutiny as it is their job to enforce
>> it. All aspects of it including presumed innocence and other
>> constitutional rights.
>>
>> David Amos
>> Reply to @Terry Tibbs: The RCMP are still playing dumb about falsely
>> arresting me even after I sued the Crown and are inviting me to do so
>> again Go Figure
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Matt Steele
>> Irwin Lampert, a provincial court judge in Moncton who retired last
>> year, said..... "Some were through inadvertence rather than
>> malfeasance. In some cases they just didn't realize that they were
>> doing something wrong and it would be pointed out to them and you
>> would hope that it wouldn't happen again."
>> That pretty much sums the problem up right there where police are not
>> held accountable for their actions , and the people in the position of
>> over seeing the Justice System let it slide , and hope that the police
>> will do better . That combined with the militarization of the police
>> is rapidly eroding the public's trust in the police and Justice System
>> . You need to look no further than what is currently happening in the
>> U.S. to see where things are eventually heading .When the only tool
>> that the police have is a hammer , then every problem starts to look
>> like a nail .
>>
>>
>> David Peters
>> Reply to @Matt Steele:
>> Imo, you picked out the most important sentence in that article, but I
>> have a completely different take on it.
>>
>> To me it shows there are checks and balances in place, in the system,
>> that are working.
>>
>> However, I feel that the law & order bureaucracy in Canada is too
>> insulated and lacks real transparency and accountability. Elections
>> and short term limits for Judges, Crown Prosecutors and police chiefs
>> would help solve the problem.
>>
>>
>> David Amos
>> Reply to @Matt Steele: Methinks you Irwin Lampert should check my work
>> N;esy Pas?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> https://nbweddings.ca/about-me/
>>
>>
>> :"For many years I was involved with various judges’ associations. I
>> served terms as President of the New Brunswick Provincial Court
>> Judges’ Association and the Canadian Association of Provincial Court
>> Judges and was a Governor of the American Judges’ Association. For a
>> number of years I was a member of the New Brunswick Judicial Council,
>> a body which dealt with complaints filed against judges."
>>
>> J. Gilles Lemieux
>> Called to the bar: 1990 (NB)
>> Lemieux Ménard & Co
>> Lawyer
>> 4405 Route 115
>> Saint-Antoine Sud, New Brunswick E4V 2Z5
>> Phone: 506-525-9717
>> Fax: 506-525-9509
>> Email: glemieux@lemcolaw.ca
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: Kevin Leahy <kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 12:38:43 -0400
>> Subject: Re: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge (857 259
>> 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> French will follow
>>
>> Thank you for your email.
>>
>> For inquiries regarding EMRO’s Office, please address your email to
>> acting EMRO Sebastien Brillon at sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>> For inquiries regarding CO NHQ Office, please address your email to
>> acting CO Farquharson, David at David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>> All PPS related correspondence should be sent to my PPS account at
>> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Merci pour votre courriel.
>>
>> Pour toute question concernant le Bureau de l'EMRO, veuillez adresser
>> vos courriels à l’Officier responsable des Relations
>> employeur-employés par intérim Sébastien Brillon à l'adresse suivante
>> sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>> Pour toute question concernant le bureau du Commandant de la
>> Direction générale, veuillez adresser vos courriels au Commandant de
>> la Direction générale par intérim Farquharson, David à l'adresse
>> suivante David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>> Toute correspondance relative au Service De Protection Parlementaire
>> doit être envoyée à mon compte de PPS à l'adresse suivante
>> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
>>
>>
>> Kevin Leahy
>> Chief Superintendent/Surintendant principal
>> Director, Parliamentary Protective Service
>> Directeur , Service de protection parlementaire
>> T 613-996-5048
>> Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are
>> confidential and may contain protected information. It is intended
>> only for the individual or entity named in the message. If you are not
>> the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver the
>> message that this email contains to the intended recipient, you should
>> not disseminate, distribute or copy this email, nor disclose or use in
>> any manner the information that it contains. Please notify the sender
>> immediately if you have received this email by mistake and delete it.
>> AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ: Le présent courriel et tout fichier qui y est
>> joint sont confidentiels et peuvent contenir des renseignements
>> protégés. Il est strictement réservé à l’usage du destinataire prévu.
>> Si vous n’êtes pas le destinataire prévu, ou le mandataire chargé de
>> lui transmettre le message que ce courriel contient, vous ne devez ni
>> le diffuser, le distribuer ou le copier, ni divulguer ou utiliser à
>> quelque fin que ce soit les renseignements qu’il contient. Veuillez
>> aviser immédiatement l’expéditeur si vous avez reçu ce courriel par
>> erreur et supprimez-le.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: "Chaplin, Lynn (NBPC/CPNB)" <Lynn.Chaplin@gnb.ca>
>>> Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 04:58:45 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the lawyer Rob McKee as the
>>> LIEbrano Shadow Justice and Attorney General,was VERY STUPID to dlete
>>> my emails N'esy Pas/ Andrea Anderson-Mason.
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Please be advised this account is not monitored.
>>>
>>> veuillez noter que ce compte n"est pas surveillé
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: "Mitton, Megan (LEG)" <Megan.Mitton@gnb.ca>
>>> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 06:04:32 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the lawyer Rob McKee as the
>>> LIEbrano Shadow Justice and Attorney General,was VERY STUPID to delete
>>> my emails N'esy Pas Andrea Anderson-Mason???.
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Thank you for contacting me.
>>>
>>> A provincial election was called on August 17th and will be held on
>>> September 14th. During that time, my constituency office is required
>>> to be closed. The phone and email will not be monitored during this
>>> period.
>>>
>>> Thank you!
>>> Megan Mitton
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>>
>>> Merci de m'avoir contacté. Des élections provinciales ont été
>>> déclenchées le 17 août et auront lieu le 14 septembre. Pendant cette
>>> période, mon bureau de circonscription doit être fermé. Le téléphone
>>> et le courriel ne seront pas surveillés pendant cette période.
>>>
>>> Merci !
>>> Megan Mitton
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/22/20, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Brian Gallant <briangallant10@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 08:17:31 -0700
>>>> Subject: Merci / Thank you Re: Attn Robert McKee I am calling you for
>>>> the third time The pdf files hereto attached are for real
>>>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> (Français à suivre)
>>>>
>>>> If your email is pertaining to the Government of New Brunswick,
>> please
>>>> email me at brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>> If your matter is urgent, please email Greg Byrne at
>> greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>> Si votre courriel s'addresse au Gouvernement du Nouveau-Brunswick,
>>>> svp m'envoyez un courriel à brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>> Pour les urgences, veuillez contacter Greg Byrne à greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>> Merci.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 11:17:25 -0400
>>>> Subject: Attn Robert McKee I am calling you for the third time The
>> pdf
>>>> files hereto attached are for real
>>>> To: robert.mckee@fowlerlawpc.com, "brian.gallant"
>>>> <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "chris.collins" <chris.collins@gnb.ca>, tj
>>>> <tj@burkelaw.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "David.Coo>>
>>>> <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>
>>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "greg.byrne"
>>>> <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, "Jack.Keir" <Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>
>>>>
>>>> Robert K. Mckee
>>>> Called to the bar: 2012 (NB)
>>>> Fowler Law P.C. Inc.
>>>> 69 Waterloo St.
>>>> Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 0E1
>>>> Phone: 506-857-8811
>>>> Fax: 506-857-9297
>>>> Email: robert.mckee@fowlerlawpc.com
>>>>
>>>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nb-liberal-party-nomination-moncton-centre-1.4689918
>>>>
>>>> Robert McKee to run for the Liberals in Moncton Centre
>>>> Lawyer won Saturday's nomination by acclamation, a spokesperson for
>>>> the party says
>>>> CBC News · Posted: Jun 03, 2018 4:50 PM AT
>>>>
>>>> Robert McKee, a 32-year-old lawyer and first-term Moncton city
>>>> councillor, declared his candidacy for the Moncton Centre Liberal
>>>> nomination on May 17. (Submitted)
>>>>
>>>> Robert McKee has won the Moncton Centre Liberal nomination and will
>>>> run for the party in the upcoming provincial election this fall.
>>>>
>>>> The 32-year-old lawyer was elected to Moncton city council in May,
>>>> 2016, representing Ward 3, and declared his candidacy for the Moncton
>>>> Centre Liberal nomination on May 17.
>>>>
>>>> He won Saturday's nomination by acclamation, according to Duncan
>>>> Gallant, a spokesperson for the party.
>>>>
>>>> The availability to run in Moncton Centre for the Liberals opened up
>>>> after Speaker Chris Collins said he wouldn't reoffer for the party.
>>>>
>>>> Speaker Chris Collins won't reoffer for Liberals, plans to sue
>>>> premier for libel
>>>> 8 Liberals quit over premier's 'humiliating' treatment of Chris
>>>> Collins
>>>>
>>>> Premier Brian Gallant suspended Collins from the Liberal caucus on
>> the
>>>> basis of allegations of harassment made by a former employee of the
>>>> legislature.
>>>>
>>>> Collins described Premier Gallant's handling of the allegations as
>>>> "atrocious" and will finish his term as an independent.
>>>>
>>>> The election is scheduled for Sept. 24.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Good Day Sir
>>>>>
>>>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and
>> managed
>>>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>>>
>>>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady
>> who
>>>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the
>> Sgt
>>>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>>>
>>>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>>>
>>>>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>>>>>
>>>>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>>>>
>>>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>>>>>
>>>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>>>>>
>>>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>>>
>>>>> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>>>
>>>>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>>>
>>>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>>>
>>>>> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>>>
>>>>> Date: 20151223
>>>>>
>>>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>>>
>>>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>>>
>>>>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>>>
>>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>>>
>>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>>>
>>>>> Plaintiff
>>>>>
>>>>> and
>>>>>
>>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>>>
>>>>> Defendant
>>>>>
>>>>> ORDER
>>>>>
>>>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>>>
>>>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by>>> 12, 2015, in which
>>>>> Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of
>> Claim
>>>>> in its entirety.
>>>>>
>>>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention
>> a
>>>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the
>> Canadian
>>>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen
>> Quigg,
>>>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that
>> letter
>>>>> he stated:
>>>>>
>>>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check
>> the
>>>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including
>> you.
>>>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>>>
>>>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number
>> of
>>>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be
>> witnesses
>>>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court
>> of
>>>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and,
>> retired
>>>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>>>> Police.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should
>> I
>>>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et
>> al,
>>>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party
>> has
>>>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator
>> of
>>>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.
>> There
>>>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>>>
>>>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>>>> Judge
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had
>> sent
>>>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>>>
>>>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>>>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>>>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>>>
>>>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau
>> the
>>>>> most
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>>>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>>>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>>>>> dudes are way past too late
>>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre
>> à
>>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>>
>>>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more
>> war
>>>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>>>
>>>>> January 13, 2015
>>>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>>>
>>>>> December 8, 2014
>>>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>>>
>>>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>>>
>>>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>>>
>>>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean
>> Chretien
>>>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second
>> campaign
>>>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary
>> to
>>>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There
>> were
>>>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the
>> dearth
>>>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins
>> to
>>>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister
>> Chretien’s
>>>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>>>
>>>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that
>> then
>>>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>>>
>>>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and
>> babbling
>>>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by
>> planners
>>>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>>>
>>>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and
>> control,
>>>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital
>> and
>>>>>
>>>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions
>> of
>>>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC
>> have
>>>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Subject:>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"
>>>>> MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>>>
>>>>> January 30, 2007
>>>>>
>>>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>>>
>>>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>>>
>>>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December
>> 29,
>>>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>>>
>>>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I
>> have
>>>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner
>> Steve
>>>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>
>>>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>>>> Minister of Health
>>>>>
>>>>> CM/cb
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>>>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com,
>> riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
>>>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>>>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>>>
>>>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our
>> position
>>>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>>>
>>>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>>>
>>>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>
>>>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>>>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>>>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Amos,
>>>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister
>> of
>>>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>>>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the
>> Province
>>>> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>>>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>>>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
>>>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>>>
>>>> Department of Justice
>>>>
>>>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well
>> Please
>>>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>>>
>>>>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
>>>>> ilian.html
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As the CBC etc yap>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY
>>>>>> FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament
>> baseball
>>>>>> cards?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
>>>>>> 6
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>>>>>
>>>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>>>> United States Senate
>>>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the
>> matters
>>>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>>>> tapes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this
>> previously.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>>>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>>>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>>>> The Supreme Court
>>>>
>>>>
>> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>>>
>>>> Amos v. Canada
>>>> Court (s) Database
>>>>
>>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>>> Date
>>>>
>>>> 2017-10-30
>>>> Neutral citation
>>>>
>>>> 2017 FCA 213
>>>> File numbers
>>>>
>>>> A-48-16
>>>> Date: 20171030
>>>>
>>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>>> CORAM:
>>>>
>>>> WEBB J.A.
>>>> NEAR J.A.
>>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>>> and
>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>>>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>>>
>>>> THE COURT
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Date: 20171030
>>>>
>>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>>> CORAM:
>>>>
>>>> WEBB J.A.
>>>> NEAR J.A.
>>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>>> and
>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>>>
>>>> I. Introduction
>>>>
>>>> [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr.
>> Amos)
>>>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>>>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11
>> million
>>>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and
>> Provincial
>>>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>>>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>>>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>>>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>>>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>>>
>>>> [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of
>> a
>>>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>>>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>>>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>>>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>>>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>>>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>>>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>>>>>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>>>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>>>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>>>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19,
>> 2016.
>>>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>>>> cross-appeal.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> II. Preliminary Matter
>>>>
>>>> [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>>>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>>>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two
>> of
>>>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>>>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he
>> believed
>>>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>>>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>>>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>>>
>>>> [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>>>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>>>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>>>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>>>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed
>> in
>>>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>>>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>>>> c. F-7:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>>>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>>>> Appeal.
>>>> […]
>>>>
>>>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>>>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>>>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>>>> […]
>>>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>>>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>>>
>>>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de
>> la
>>>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>>>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [7] However, these subsections only provide that the
>>>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>>>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>>>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>>>> section.
>>>> [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>>>> that:
>>>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal
>> Court
>>>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>>>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>>>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>>>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and
>> as
>>>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>>
>>>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour
>> d’appel
>>>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>>>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est
>> maintenue
>>>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>>>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>>>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>>>> matière civile et pénale.
>>>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal
>> Court
>>>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>>>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>>>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>>>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>>>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>>
>>>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>>>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>>>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>>>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>>>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>>>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>>>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>>>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>>>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>>>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would
>> no
>>>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>>>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>>>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement
>> to
>>>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>>>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>>>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of
>> that
>>>> appeal book.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>>>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>>>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>>>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>>>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>>>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>>>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>>>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>>>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>>>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>>>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>>>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>>>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>>>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>>>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>>>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>>>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>>>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>>>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>>>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>>>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>>>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>>>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>>>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>>>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>>>> such judge had a conflict.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>>>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>>>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>>>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>>>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>>>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>>>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>>>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which
>> Mr.
>>>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>>>> was a member of such firm.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>>>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice
>> Webb,
>>>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>>>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos
>> at
>>>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>>>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>>>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings
>> were
>>>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>>>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>>>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>>>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice
>> Webb
>>>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>>>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen
>> May
>>>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer.
>> The
>>>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>>>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>>>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>>>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>>>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>>>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>>>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>>>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>>>> [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>>>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In
>> Wewaykum
>>>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>>>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>>>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>>>> apprehension of bias:
>>>> 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>>>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>>>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>>>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>>>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>>>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>>>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>>>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>>>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>>>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having
>> thought
>>>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>>>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>>>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>>>
>>>> [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>>>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>>>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>>>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>>>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>>>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>>>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>>>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>>>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>>>> (4th) 193).
>>>>
>>>> [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>>>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the
>> Supreme
>>>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>>>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>>>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>>>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The
>> Ontario
>>>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>>>> judge had no involvement with the person or th>> lawyer. The Ontario
>>>> Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>>>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>>>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>>>> 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>>>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>>>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>>>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>>>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>>>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>>>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>>>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>>>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by
>> the
>>>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>>>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>>>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>>>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>>>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>>>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>>>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>>>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>>>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>>>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>>>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>>>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>>>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>>>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>>>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>>>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>>>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>>>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>>>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 30 That brings me then to consider the particular
>> circumstances
>>>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>>>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there
>> are
>>>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not
>> to
>>>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>>>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>>>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>>>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>>>> To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>>>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>>>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor
>> is
>>>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>>>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>>>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>>>> 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>>>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>>>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>>>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>>>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>>>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>>>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>>>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>>>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>>>> In these circumstances it ca>> trial judge could not remain impartial
>>>> in
>>>> the case. The mere fact
>> that
>>>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>>>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he
>> would
>>>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>>>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>>>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour
>> a
>>>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six
>> years
>>>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>>>> events from over a decade ago.
>>>> (emphasis added)
>>>>
>>>> [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>>>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>>>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made
>> it
>>>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>>>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>>>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>>>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>>>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>>>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>>>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>>>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>>>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>>>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>>>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in
>> Justice
>>>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>>>
>>>> [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>>>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>>>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member
>> of
>>>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no
>> involvement
>>>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>>>
>>>> [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>>>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>>>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>>>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>>>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>>>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving
>> Mr.
>>>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>>>
>>>> [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>>>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true
>> copy
>>>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>>>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>>>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement
>> authorities
>>>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>>>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>>>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>>>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>>>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>>>
>>>> [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>>>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for
>> him
>>>> to recuse himself.
>>>>
>>>> [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>>>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>>>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>>>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in
>> the
>>>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>>>
>>>> [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>>>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>>>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>>>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At th>> both
>>>> Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>>>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>>>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>>>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>>>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>>>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>>>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>>>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> III. Issue
>>>>
>>>> [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>>>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the
>> Claim
>>>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>>>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>>>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>>>
>>>> IV. Analysis
>>>>
>>>> A. Standard of Review
>>>>
>>>> [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>>>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>>>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>>>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>>>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>>>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>>>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>>>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>>>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>>>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>>>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>>>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>>>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>>>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>>>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere
>> with
>>>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary
>> order
>>>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>>>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>>>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>>>
>>>> [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>>>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This
>> Court
>>>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>>>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>>>> interfere.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>>>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>>>
>>>> [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>>>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>>>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>>>
>>>> 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>>>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>>>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in
>> 2006
>>>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>>>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right
>> of
>>>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>>>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>>>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>>>> (…)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>>>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>>>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>>>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>>>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to
>> advance.
>>>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>>>> only speculate as to the true and/or int>> best, the Plaintiff’s action
>>>> may possibly be summarized as: he
>>>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>>>> [footnotes omitted].
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the
>> Claim
>>>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>>>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>>>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>>>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>>>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In
>> considering
>>>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>>>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>>>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>>>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>>>> para. 27).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>>>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>>>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v.
>> Canada,
>>>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003
>> SCC
>>>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>>>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>>>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>>>
>>>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>>>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>>>
>>>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>>>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff;
>> and
>>>>
>>>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>>>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that
>> a
>>>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>>>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>>>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>>>
>>>> [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed
>> sufficient
>>>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>>>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>>>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>>>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>>>
>>>> [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of
>> pleadings
>>>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>>>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>>>
>>>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>>>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>>>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>>>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>>>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making
>> bald,
>>>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>>>> of process…
>>>>
>>>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>>>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>>>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>>>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>>>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>>>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>>>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>>>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>>>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>>>
>>>> [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>>>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>>>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>>>
>>>> [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>>>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>>>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>>>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>>>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the R>> engaged in
>>>> deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>>>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>>>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred
>> from
>>>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>>>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>>>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>>>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>>>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the
>> RCMP
>>>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>>>> supporting a cause of action.
>>>>
>>>> [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>>>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>>>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>>>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>>>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>>>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>>>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>>>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>>>
>>>> V. Conclusion
>>>> [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>>>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>>>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>>>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>>>> without leave to amend.
>>>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>>>> J.A.
>>>> "David G. Near"
>>>> J.A.
>>>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>>>> J.A.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>>>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>>>
>>>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT
>> DATED
>>>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>>>> DOCKET:
>>>>
>>>> A-48-16
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>>>
>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>>>
>>>> Fredericton,
>>>> New Brunswick
>>>>
>>>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>>>
>>>> May 24, 2017
>>>>
>>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>>>
>>>> WEBB J.A.
>>>> NEAR J.A.
>>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>>
>>>> DATED:
>>>>
>>>> October 30, 2017
>>>>
>>>> APPEARANCES:
>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>>>> (on his own behalf)
>>>>
>>>> Jan Jensen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>>
>>>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>>>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>>>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>>>
>>>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>> From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
>>>> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 23:04:24 +0000
>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Higgs's rationale for a
>>>> snap-election was flawed bigtime N'esy Pas?
>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
>>>>
>>>> Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
>>>> that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
>>>> understanding.
>>>>
>>>> If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
>>>> visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.
>>>>
>>>> If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
>>>> (506) 453-2144.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bonjour,
>>>>
>>>> Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
>>>>
>>>> Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
>>>> quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
>>>> Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
>>>>
>>>> Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
>>>> veuillez visiter
>>>> www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.
>>>>
>>>> S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
>>>> Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
>>>>
>>>> Merci.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
>>>> P.O Box/C. P. 6000
>>>> Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nou>> Email/Courriel:
>>>> premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 20:04:18 -0300
>>>> Subject: Methinks Higgs's rationale for a snap-election was flawed
>>>> bigtime N'esy Pas?
>>>> To: oldmaison@yahoo.com, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, chris@duffie.ca,
>>>> ron.tremblay2@gmail.com, aadnc.minister.aandc@canada.ca,
>>>> jake.stewart@gnb.ca, andre@jafaust.com, rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca,
>>>> kris.austin@gnb.ca, michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, "David.Coon"
>>>> <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca, "Mitton, Megan (LEG)"
>>>> <megan.mitton@gnb.ca>, "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"
>>>> <kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca>, "Kevin.Vickers" <Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>,
>>>> Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "dan.
>>>> bussieres" <dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>, "serge.rousselle"
>>>> <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "greg.byrne" <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>,
>>>> "Jack.Keir" <Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>, "tyler.campbell"
>>>> <tyler.campbell@gnb.ca>, "jeff.carr" <jeff.carr@gnb.ca>,
>>>> bob.atwin@nb.aibn.com, jjatwin@gmail.com, markandcaroline
>>>> <markandcaroline@gmail.com>, sheppardmargo@gmail.com,
>>>> jordan.gill@cbc.ca, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
>> "David.Akin"
>>>> <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
>>>> carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
>>>> <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>, "Furey, John"
>> <jfurey@nbpower.com>,
>>>> "David.Lametti" <David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
>>>> "Nathalie.Drouin" <Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen"
>>>> <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier
>>>> <premier@gnb.ca>
>>>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "blaine.higgs"
>>>> <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin" <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>,
>>>> "Ross.Wetmore" <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "Shane.Fowler"
>>>> <Shane.Fowler@cbc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "PETER.MACKAY"
>>>> <PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com>, "Katie.Telford"
>>>> <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, postur <postur@for.is>, postur
>>>> <postur@fjr.stjr.is>
>>>>
>>>> https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
>>>> Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
>>>> Methinks I should not have been surprised to see the VERY CORRUPT CBC
>>>> block me in Facebook just like they do in Twitter and in the very
>>>> domain we all pay for with our tax dollars N'esy Pas?
>>>>
>>>>
>> https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/08/higgss-rationale-for-no-snap-election.html
>>>>
>>>> #nbpoli #cdnpoli
>>>>
>>>>
>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/provincial-election-covid-19-1.5691769
>>>>
>>>> CBC's Facebook Live answers questions about provincial election
>>>> Do you have questions about the election on Sept. 14? We have answers
>>>>
>>>> CBC News · Posted: Aug 19, 2020 10:44 AM AT
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 46 Comments
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> David Amos
>>>> Content disabled
>>>> Methinks they will block me in Facebook just like they do in Twitter
>>>> N'esy
>>>> Pas?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> BINGO
>>>> Your account has been banned until September 3, 2020. Reason: We have
>>>> banned this account for 15 days because we believe it is in violation
>>>> of our Terms of Use. For more information, please visit:
>>>> http://cbc.ca/submissions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nb-premier-blaine-higgs-no-election-agreement-flawed-1.5685109
>>>>
>>>> Higgs's rationale for no-snap-election deal is flawed, says political
>>>> expert
>>>> Three byelections must be held this fall
>>>>
>>>> Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Aug 13, 2020 2:50 PM AT
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 99 Comments
>>>> Commenting is now closed for this story.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> David Amos
>>>> Methinks "political experts" make some of the best clowns in Higgy's
>>>> circus but the Green Meanies take the cake N'esy Pas?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> David Amos
>>>> A false dilemma??? Too Too Funny
>>>>
>>>> "One thing that is very important to realize is that there's not two
>>>> options here," Green MLA Kevin Arseneau said on his way in to the
>>>> meeting. "It's not an election or a deal. That's like a false dilemma
>>>> that's>> back door SANB Liberal or continue running as an uncommitted
>>>> Green ?
>>>> We know what Gauvins true colours always were ! Same as Arsenault !
>>>>
>>>> David Amos
>>>> Reply to @Lou Bell: Methinks you must have enough clues between your
>>>> ears to understand that a dilemma is a dilemma for the former SANB
>>>> boss and that is no such thing as a false one N'esy Pas?
>>>>
>>>> Jos Allaire
>>>> Reply to @Lou Bell: I see that you are obsessed with the SANB, grosse
>> bee
>>>> got!
>>>>
>>>> Jos Allaire
>>>> Reply to @David Amos: I think you are giving Lou Dumbell too much
>> credit.
>>>>
>>>> David Amos
>>>> Reply to @Jos Allaire: Welcome back to the circus Maggie
>>>>
>>>> Lou Bell
>>>> Reply to @David Amos: Ah yes , the reincarnation of poor Maggie ! And
>>>> we also know who Marc is now . With an Anglophone name to boot !
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jason Inness
>>>> I think Higgs has done a pretty good job. However, this is a
>>>> disturbing trend that he is always looking for more power. He doesn't
>>>> seem to consult his caucus on important decisions (i.e. the ER
>>>> Closures), he wanted more power legislated into the EM Act (and
>> backed
>>>> down when he couldn't get the votes to pass it), and now he wants the
>>>> opposition to declare two years of support for his government. If
>> this
>>>> is how he acts with a minority, can he really be trusted with a
>>>> majority government?
>>>>
>>>> Jos Allaire
>>>> Reply to @Jason Inness: I agree with you on everything except the
>>>> first sentence.
>>>>
>>>> David Amos
>>>> Reply to @Jos Allaire: Methinks Maggie by any other name is like moth
>>>> to flame N'esy Pas?
>>>>
>>>> Lou Bell
>>>> Reply to @Jason Inness: Can the SANB Liberals be trusted any at all ?
>>>> See their UNDISCLOSED 130 million dollar giveaway of taxpayers money
>>>> !!! Obviously they can't !!!!!!!!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Al Borland
>>>> If Higgs were to send Cardy packing back to the N D P , Greens, or
>>>> Liberals where he belongs then he'd gain my vote. Otherwise, let's
>>>> hope the P A N B do well.
>>>>
>>>> David Amos
>>>> Reply to @Al Borland: Now thats funny. Methinks you PANB people
>> should
>>>> Google Cardy Higgs and butter tarts ASAP N'esy Pas?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Peter Baxter
>>>> Inconceivable.....
>>>> Very much against tradition....
>>>> Like Brian Gallant refusing to step aside when he did not have the
>> most
>>>> seats!
>>>>
>>>> So ... we know......inconceivable and very much against tradition
>>>> ...are trade marks of the Liberals !
>>>> "It would be very much against how custom and convention typically
>>>> operate in Canada" ,...yep...that describes what Brian did....only
>> two
>>>> years ago...in a nutshell
>>>>
>>>> David Amos
>>>> Reply to @Peter Baxter: You understand that it is just a circus?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Fred Brewer
>>>> I smell desperation coming from the PC camp.
>>>>
>>>> David Amos
>>>> Reply to @Fred Brewer: Me Too
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/robert-gauvin-election-former-deputy-premier-1.5690535
>>>>
>>>> Former PC cabinet minister runs for Liberals in Shediac Bay-Dieppe
>>>> Robert Gauvin was deputy premier and minister of tourism in Blaine
>>>> Higgs's cabinet until quitting
>>>>
>>>> Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Aug 18, 2020 11:47 AM AT
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 233 Comments
>>>> Commenting is now closed for this story.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> David Amos
>>>> Content disabled
>>>> Methinks Higgy et al are well aware that I am overjoyed by the fact
>>>> that Mr Gauvin donned a red coat and opted to remain in the circus
>>>> N'esy Pas?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> David Amos
>>>> Surprise Surprise Surprise
>>>>
>>>> Josef Blow
>>>> Reply to @David Amos: Just when you thought you were having a good
>>>> day, along comes the Beard.
>>>>
>>>> David Amos
>>>> Content disabled
>>>> Reply to @Josef Blow: Methinks you are just jealous that you can't
>>>> grow one worth talking about N'esy Pas?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jim Cyr
>>>> He's an opportunistic disgrace to all Acadians.
>>>>
>>>> David Amos
>>>> Content disabled
>>>> Reply to @Jim Cyr: Methinks many Acadians appreciate his skills as>>
>>>> these guys will do anything to guarantee the golden pension....say
>> one
>>>> thing to get votes and then follow whatever party line there
>> is...it's
>>>> disgusting...
>>>>
>>>> David Amos
>>>> Content disabled
>>>> Reply to @David Stairs: Methinks it par for the course that all
>>>> politicians and public employees play N'esy Pas?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Johnny Almar
>>>> This is enough reason to ditch the Liberal party.
>>>>
>>>> Vickers will probably lose in Miramichi because the PA has a well
>>>> liked and respected MLA there already.
>>>>
>>>> Insiders have balked at Vickers’ poor social skills and overall
>>>> snobiness.
>>>>
>>>> Al Borland
>>>> Reply to @Johnny Almar: Let's hope the People's Alliance replace the
>>>> Liberals as the official opposition. I see good things in the future
>>>> for New Brunswick. A level of unity and pride that we haven't had for
>>>> a long time.
>>>>
>>>> Janice small
>>>> Reply to @Johnny Almar: Thie is nothing exciting about Vickers, poor
>>>> people skills,, no experience in gouvernment reminds of my
>> grandfather
>>>> when he talks, little no no charisma and really knows nothing about
>>>> being Premier.. Just like Gallant,, but that's what the party wants a
>>>> soft gumby who they can twist and bend and make him tow the party
>>>> line.. God forsaken if they had somebody with a voice and an
>> opinion..
>>>>
>>>> David Amos
>>>> Reply to @Johnny Almar: Imagine me agreeing with you. Methinks
>> amazing
>>>> things never cease N'esy Pas?
>>>>
>>>> David Amos
>>>> Reply to @Al Borland: Dream on
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Luke Armstrong
>>>> Shediac Bay - Dieppe...do you they ever elect anyone but Liberals?
>>>>
>>>> val harris
>>>> Reply to @Luke Armstrong: No and it shows they know what they are
>>>> doin. Well done Shediac
>>>>
>>>> Ray Oliver
>>>> Reply to @Luke Armstrong: French name, the vote is yours. Doesn't
>>>> matter what kind of human garbage it is
>>>>
>>>> Josef Blow
>>>> Reply to @Ray Oliver: Pretty nasty language there, Mr. Oliver ! I'm
>>>> surprised CBC would, in this very situation, allow "human garage"
>> such
>>>> as that to which you so gingerly refer, to publish such offensive
>>>> gibberish.
>>>>
>>>> Ray Oliver
>>>> Reply to @Josef Blow: Did I hurt your feelings? Awww
>>>>
>>>> Ray Oliver
>>>> Reply to @Josef Blow: Whats a human garage? I'm confused. If you're
>>>> gonna go all moral police on someone get the nasty bits right at
>>>> least, precious Mr blow
>>>>
>>>> Greg Windsor
>>>> Reply to @val harris: well that is certainly where the money is being
>>>> pumped into....
>>>>
>>>> Josef Blow
>>>> Reply to @Ray Oliver: A gallant effort Ray, but you'"ll need to eat a
>>>> few more Wheaties to get up to speed. I'll sip my Red Rose waiting
>> for
>>>> your arrival … ah, I'll make a pot. Lots of time … And, my feelings
>>>> are damaged … but I'll make it. Ne pas worry.
>>>>
>>>> Ray Oliver
>>>> Reply to @Josef Blow: A "Gallant" effort. Perfect candidate for
>>>> Shediac. Maybe prop one up like weekend at Bernies, he/she would win
>>>> every time. Be about as useful too
>>>>
>>>> Jeff Leblanc
>>>> Reply to @Ray Oliver: just mute this new guy who seems to be a
>>>> condescending jerk. Thats what I'm doing. Then him and David Amos and
>>>> Marc Martin can all play together in the sandbox with nobody' to
>>>> bother them
>>>>
>>>> David Amos
>>>> Reply to @Josef Blow: Imagine me agreeing with you. Methinks amazing
>>>> things never cease N'esy Pas?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Brian Robertson
>>>> It's always been us and them.
>>>> The French always vote Liberal, so we either concede to them of vote
>>>> Conservative.
>>>>
>>>> Jeff LeBlanc
>>>> Reply to @Brian Robertson: or...and here me out, you could vote
>>>> purple. Then one day, not this election cycle or even next, but one
>>>> day they might get enough seats to be a viable alternative. We will
>>>> never know unless we give it a shot.
>>>>
>>>> Dan Lee
>>>> Reply to @Brian Robertson:
>>>> What is it with you quys ..the french this ....the french that.......
>>>>
>>>> Jeff LeBlanc
>>>> Reply to @Dan Lee: well I mean come on. In NB the French are quite
>>>> vocal and tend to be catered to by th>> bother me too but I've come to
>>>> accept it will never change. Your food
>>>> will taste better and the air will be fresher when you realize that
>>>> sad fact.
>>>>
>>>> Dan Lee
>>>> Reply to @Jeff LeBlanc: bahahahaha.......yea......
>> bahahaha...........
>>>>
>>>> Josef Blow
>>>> Reply to @Jeff LeBlanc: So, you appear to equate "Purple" (such a
>>>> noble colour for such a petty party) with "Green", (as in the
>>>> expression, "The grass is always greener on the other side".
>>>>
>>>> Someone once told me that the reason why the grass is likely "greener
>>>> on the other side", is because that is where the septic tank is … . I
>>>> think the idea fits the bill here.
>>>>
>>>> Jeff LeBlanc
>>>> Reply to @Josef Blow: the only way the grass would be greener near
>> the
>>>> septic tank would be it it was leaking
>>>>
>>>> Natalie Pugh
>>>> Reply to @Jeff LeBlanc: We need to, now more than ever, force the
>>>> change! Our children and grandchildren have been placed second best
>>>> simply for not being able to speak a language that is fading away.
>>>> After all what are the true stats of those who are unilingual french
>>>> in NB....3%?? It's not about culture and never was. It's control over
>>>> the job market and nothing else.
>>>>
>>>> David Amos
>>>> Reply to @Brian Robertson: Methinks you should explain to folks real
>>>> slow why lots of French folks voted for Mr Gauvin in the last
>> election
>>>> or all the other Conservatives they have elected in the past
>>>> particularly under the mandates of Hatfield, Lord and even Alward
>>>> N'esy Pas?
>>>>
>>>> Brian Robertson
>>>> Reply to @David Amos:
>>>> I think you should explain this bizarre idiom you have adopted as
>> some
>>>> kind a signature preamble and postscript to all your comments.
>>>> But, in the fullness of time and the plethora of my posts, you will
>>>> find the answers to your query.
>>>> It would be redundant of me to repeat it merely at your request.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Eric Plexe
>>>> Robert Gauvin would not be the only political opportunist to change
>>>> parties as Dominic Cardy was formerly the leader of the NB NDP.
>>>>
>>>> Mack Leigh
>>>> Reply to @Eric Plexe:
>>>> It is not about political conviction, ethics or strength of character
>>>> but all about what Gauvin can benefit from this move..
>>>>
>>>> Terry Tibbs
>>>> Reply to @Mack Leigh:
>>>> Much the same as Mr Cardy then..............
>>>>
>>>> David Amos
>>>> Reply to @Terry Tibbs: Methinks Minister Cardy won't miss having to
>>>> share his butter tarts with the former Deputy Premier as his former
>>>> conservative cohort Mr Duffie challenges him for his seat N'esy Pas?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Lou Bell
>>>> Now all we need is for Arsenault to admit his also being another SANB
>>>> Liberal .
>>>>
>>>> David Amos
>>>> Reply to @Lou Bell: Methinks you forgot that when the liberals didn't
>>>> want him to run for them last time he snubbed Higgy et al and ran for
>>>> the Green Meanies instead N'esy Pas?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 22:37:46 -0300
>>>> Subject: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the farm on anything a
>>>> cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas?
>>>> To: Amy.Sturgeon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, irwinlampert@gmail.com,
>>>> glemieux@lemcolaw.ca, "Larry.Tremblay"
>>>> <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Roger.Brown"
>>>> <Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca,
>>>> Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>>> Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
>>>> "Barbara.Whitenect" <Barbara.Whitenect@gnb.ca>, "carl.urquhart"
>>>> <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
>>>> "barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Newsroom
>>>> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Nathalie Sturgeon
>>>> <sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
>>>> Friday.Joe@psic-ispc.gc.ca, "Shane.Magee" <Shane.Magee@cbc.ca>,
>>>> "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca,
>>>> Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca
>>>> Cc: Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Premier@ontario.ca,
>>>> Patricia.Levesque@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, mot>> ---------- Original message
>>>> ----------
>>>> From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
>>>> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:15:01 +0000
>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the
>>>> farm on anything a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas
>>>> Cleveland Allaby?
>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
>>>>
>>>> Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
>>>> that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
>>>> understanding.
>>>>
>>>> If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
>>>> visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.
>>>>
>>>> If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
>>>> (506) 453-2144.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bonjour,
>>>>
>>>> Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
>>>>
>>>> Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
>>>> quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
>>>> Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
>>>>
>>>> Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
>>>> veuillez visiter
>>>> www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.
>>>>
>>>> S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
>>>> Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
>>>>
>>>> Merci.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
>>>> P.O Box/C. P. 6000
>>>> Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick
>>>> E3B 5H1
>>>> Canada
>>>> Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
>>>> Email/Courriel: premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>> From: "Axiotis-Perez, Alex" <Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
>>>> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:14:56 +0000
>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the
>>>> farm on anything a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas
>>>> Cleveland Allaby?
>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>> Please note that I am currently away from the office.
>>>> For any urgent matters during my absence, please contact Brooke
>>>> Malinoski (Brooke.Malinoski@pmo-cpm.gc.ca)
>>>> Thank you!
>>>> *****
>>>> Bonjour,
>>>> Veuillez noter que je suis présentement absent du bureau.
>>>> Pour toute question urgente pendent mon absence, veuillez contacter
>>>> Brooke Malinoski (Brooke.Malinoski@pmo-cpm.gc.ca)
>>>> Merci !
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>> From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
>>>> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:15:00 +0000
>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the
>>>> farm on anything a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas
>>>> Cleveland Allaby?
>>>> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
>>>> Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
>>>>
>>>> Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
>>>> constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
>>>> further notice. We will continue to provide service during our
>> regular
>>>> office hours, both over the phone and via email.
>>>>
>>>> Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
>>>> office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation
>> to
>>>> our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
>>>> are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
>>>> your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
>>>> MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en
>>>>
>>>> Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office
>> if
>>>> your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
>>>> volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
>>>>
>>>> Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
>>>> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
>>>> as possi>> Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
>>>> Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
>>>> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>>>>
>>>> **
>>>> Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable
>> Bill
>>>> Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
>>>>
>>>> Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
>>>> s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
>>>> en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
>>>> services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
>>>> que par courrier ?lectronique.
>>>>
>>>> En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre
>> bureau
>>>> classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
>>>> et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
>>>> Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
>>>> veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
>>>> trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
>>>> site:https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr
>>>>
>>>> En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
>>>> votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
>>>> extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
>>>> courrier ?lectronique.
>>>>
>>>> Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
>>>> site : http://www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus
>>>>
>>>> Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que
>>>> possible.
>>>>
>>>> Cordialement,
>>>>
>>>> Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
>>>> Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
>>>> Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
>>>> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>>>> < mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment