David Raymond Amos Sues Queen of England: Long Time Truther Exposing Mutual Funds Corruptions and More
David Raymond Amos
Views: 24
Part 2 David Raymond Amos Interview by Newsline #Queen #Queenbees
David Raymond Amos
Views: 17
David Raymond Amos Interview by Newsline #Queen #Queenbees Exposes Corrupt Mutual Funds , Video and transcripts Deleted by the Watchdogs, proof here https://www.banking.senate.gov/hearings/review-of-current-investigations-and-regulatory-actions-regarding-the-mutual-fund-industry
David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15
Full pdf link here below https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2015/09/
Proof emails link here below
https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/35857377/david-amos-e-mails-checktheevidencecom
Court File No. T-1557-15FEDERAL COURT
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Plaintiff
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
The Parties
- HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN (Crown) is Elizabeth II, the Queen of England, the Protector of the Faith of the Church of England, the longest reigning monarch of the United Kingdom and one of the wealthiest persons in the world. Canada pays homage to the Queen because she remained the Head of State and the Chief Executive Officer of Canada after the Canada Act 1982 (U.K.) 1982, c. 11 came into force on April 17, 1982. The standing of the Queen in Canada was explained within the 2002 Annual Report FORM 18-K filed by Canada with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). It states as follows: “The executive power of the federal Government is vested in the Queen, represented by the Governor General, whose powers are exercised on the advice of the federal Cabinet, which is responsible to the House of Commons. The legislative branch at the federal level, Parliament, consists of the Crown, the Senate and the House of Commons.” “The executive power in each province is vested in the Lieutenant Governor, appointed by the Governor General on the advice of the federal Cabinet. The Lieutenant Governor’s powers are exercised on the advice of the provincial cabinet, which is responsible to the legislative assembly. Each provincial legislature is composed of a Lieutenant Governor and a legislative assembly made up of members elected for a period of five years.”
- Her Majesty the Queen is the named defendant pursuant to sections 23(1) and 36 of the Crown Liability and Proceedings Act. Some of the state actors whose duties and actions are at issue in this action are the Prime Minister, Premiers, Governor General, Lieutenant Governors, members of the Canadian Forces (CF), and Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), federal and provincial Ministers of Public Safety, Ministers of Justice, Ministers of Finance, Speakers, Clerks, Sergeants-at-Arms and any other person acting as Aide-de-Camp providing security within and around the House of Commons, the legislative assemblies or acting as security for other federal, provincial and municipal properties.
- Her Majesty the Queen’s servants the RCMP
whose mandate is to serve and protect Canadian citizens and assist in
the security of parliamentary properties and the protection of public
officials should not deny a correspondence from a former Deputy Prime
Minister who was appointed to be Canada’s first Minister of Public
Safety in order to oversee the RCMP and their cohorts. The letter that
helped to raise the ire of a fellow Canadian citizen who had never voted
in his life to run for public office four times thus far is quoted as
follows: “Mr. David R. Amos Jan 3rd, 2004
153Alvin Avenue
Milton, MA U.S.A. 02186Dear Mr. AmosThank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to
my predecessor, the Honorable Wayne Easter, regarding your safety.
I apologize for the delay in responding. If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
suggest that you contact the police of local jurisdiction. In addition, any
evidence of criminal activity should be brought to their attention since the
police are in the best position to evaluate the information and take action
as deemed appropriate. I trust that this information is satisfactory.Yours sincerely A. Anne McLellan” - DAVID RAYMOND AMOS (Plaintiff), a Canadian Citizen and the first Chief of the Amos Clan, was born in Sackville, New Brunswick (NB) on July 17th, 1952.
- The Plaintiff claims standing in this action as a citizen whose human rights and democratic interests are to be protected by due performance of the obligations of Canada’s public officials who are either elected or appointed and all servants of the Crown whose mandate is to secure the public safety, protect public interests and to uphold and enforce the rule of law. The Crown affirms his right to seek relief for offences to his rights under section 24(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charter). Paragraphs 6 to 13 explain the delay in bringing this action before Federal Court and paragraphs 25 to 88 explain this matter.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 19:46:12 -0400
Subject: YO Mr Trudeau Need I say Bah Humbug again???
To: ragingdissident@protonmail.com
<motomaniac333@gmail.com>, blevy@postmedia.com, "rick@fodalaw.com, pm
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, \"Michael.Duheme"
<Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Cc: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.ab.ca>, paulpalango <paulpalango@protonmail.com>, Office
of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.nl.ca>
Dec 14th, 2015 https://archive.org/details/
>>>>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>>>>
>>>>> 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>>>
>>>>> January 13, 2015
>>>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>>>
>>>>> December 8, 2014
>>>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>>>
>>>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>>>
>>>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>>>
>>>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>>>
>>>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>>>
>>>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>>>
>>>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>>>> essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An
>>>>> ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear
>>>>> and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,”
>>>>> or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of
>>>>> terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states
>>>>> “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of
>>>>> Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an
>>>>> ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the
>>>>> Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
>>>>>
>>>>> One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty
>>>>> was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the
>>>>> amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time
>>>>> denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time
>>>>> self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of
>>>>> “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the
>>>>> G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious
>>>>> behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister
>>>>> Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully
>>>>> cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits
>>>>> are not.
>>>>>
>>>>> Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal
>>>>> mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the
>>>>> world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy”
>>>>> David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security
>>>>> and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can
>>>>> and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing
>>>>> “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war
>>>>> criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending
>>>>> tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
>>>>>
>>>>> In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
>>>>> “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
>>>>> successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing,
>>>>> marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian
>>>>> military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern
>>>>> equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are
>>>>> antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five
>>>>> years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that
>>>>> won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
>>>>>
>>>>> My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
>>>>> Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin
>>>>> Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not
>>>>> served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social
>>>>> democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and
>>>>> other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet
>>>>> these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to
>>>>> other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
>>>>>
>>>>> Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security,
>>>>> and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before
>>>>> shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
>>>>>
>>>>> Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now
>>>>>
>>>>> From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
>>>>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
>>>>> Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and
>>>>> the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still
>>>>> alive
>>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
>>>>> your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply
>>>>> to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
>>>>> Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the
>>>>> War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
>>>>> To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil,
>>>>> Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.
>>>>> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>> dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca,
>>>>> milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca,
>>>>> sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari
>>>>> <smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
>>>>> susan@blueskystrategygroup.com
>>>>> eugene@blueskystrategygroup.
>>>>> Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice" <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin"
>>>>> <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower
>>>>> <whistleblower@ctv.ca>
>>>>>
>>>>> I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David
>>>>> Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's
>>>>> Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on
>>>>> CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To
>>>>> be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested
>>>>> that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise
>>>>> if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else
>>>>> about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact that your
>>>>> old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English
>>>>> never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is
>>>>> interesting though
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
>>>>> this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
>>>>> Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad
>>>>> Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/
>>>>>
>>>>> The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a
>>>>> shy political animal
>>>>>
>>>>> Veritas Vincit
>>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>>> 902 800 0369
>>>>>
>>>>> Enjoy Mr Weston
>>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/
>>>>>
>>>>> "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
>>>>> brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
>>>>> says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
>>>>> to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
>>>>> including a Canadian general.
>>>>>
>>>>> That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
>>>>> who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
>>>>> U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was
>>>>> also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
>>>>> prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
>>>>>
>>>>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.
>>>>>
>>>>> "I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
>>>>> being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
>>>>> demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
>>>>> "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
>>>>> into the US policy.
>>>>>
>>>>> At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
>>>>> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
>>>>> in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
>>>>> report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was
>>>>> never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
>>>>> were deployed WMD.
>>>>>
>>>>> Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
>>>>> invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
>>>>> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
>>>>> (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
>>>>> about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
>>>>> that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
>>>>> authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
>>>>>
>>>>> There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
>>>>> its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
>>>>> to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
>>>>> folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
>>>>> upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions
>>>>> are to met before US troop can redeploy? Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>>>> and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of
>>>>> Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them
>>>>> correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the
>>>>> George W Bush administration was onerous
>>>>>
>>>>> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
>>>>> military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
>>>>> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
>>>>> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
>>>>> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
>>>>> operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
>>>>> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
>>>>> ....not necessarily in that order. "
>>>>>
>>>>> You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
>>>>> Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.socom.mil/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
Trudeau Appointed Judge Dismisses CAF Covid Lawsuit
Nov 22, 2024
Join David Morrow and Catherine Christensen as they tackle the dismissal of a high-profile lawsuit against the Canadian Armed Forces. Together, they uncover the complexities of the military grievance process, the struggles veterans face in seeking justice, and the far-reaching impact of the court's decision. They also explore judicial reviews of vaccine mandates, the role of dissenting voices in medicine, and the limitations of rights under the Canadian Charter. This eye-opening conversation raises critical questions about justice, constitutional reform, and the challenges faced by military personnel and veterans in Canada. Don't miss this deep dive into issues that matter!
Help the 330 CAF members fund their appeal
https://www.givesendgo.com/GDXDB?utm_...
81 Comments
---------- Original message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 4:50 PM
Subject: Fwd: Attn LGen Wayne Eyre Why doesn't Catherine Christensen's phone work???
To: <info@valourlaw.com>
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 4:50 PM
Subject: Fwd: Attn LGen Wayne Eyre Why doesn't Catherine Christensen's phone work???
To: <info@valourlaw.com>
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 2:18 PM
Subject: Fwd: Attn LGen Wayne Eyre Why doesn't Catherine Christensen's phone work???
To: wayne.eyre <wayne.eyre@forces.gc.ca>, waynenarvey <waynenarvey@hotmail.com>, prontoman1 <prontoman1@protonmail.com>, <cchristensen@valourlaw.com>
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 2:18 PM
Subject: Fwd: Attn LGen Wayne Eyre Why doesn't Catherine Christensen's phone work???
To: wayne.eyre <wayne.eyre@forces.gc.ca>, waynenarvey <waynenarvey@hotmail.com>, prontoman1 <prontoman1@protonmail.com>, <cchristensen@valourlaw.com>
Cc: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, pierre.poilievre <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, blaine.higgs <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>
January 27, 2022
Four members of the Canadian Armed Forces in court to challenge vaccine order
Originally published by NATIONAL POST. Visit the original article.
The Federal Court is scheduled to hear arguments today from four
Canadian Armed Forces members facing disciplinary action for refusing
to get vaccinated against COVID-19.
Chief of the defence Gen. Wayne Eyre ordered all Armed Forces members
to be vaccinated by the end of November or face remedial measures,
including possible dismissal from the military. That deadline has
since been extended to Dec. 18.
The order follows a similar requirement for all federal public
servants as the Liberal government sought to set an example for all
Canadians to get vaccinated. Eyre has also said his order is intended
to protect the military during the pandemic.
In sworn affidavits, the four service members challenging the order
say they are opposed to getting the vaccine for different reasons,
including concerns about its long-term safety and on religious
grounds.
“I do not have the confidence in the government’s declaration that
they are ‘safe and effective,”‘ Lt.-Col. Illo Antonio Neri states.
“More specifically, I do not believe the trials have accurately
discovered and assessed all potential long-term effects of the
vaccines.”
And while Eyre’s order allows for exemptions on medical, religious and
human rights grounds, Edmonton lawyer Catherine Christensen, who is
representing the four military members, told The Canadian Press their
requests were all rejected.
The four service members argue that not only are their constitutional
rights being violated, but that the threat of dismissal is extreme.
Continue Reading On National Post
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2023 02:26:45 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Attn LGen Wayne Eyre I just called and tried to explain
this email and Federal Court File No T-1557-15 in particular
To: cchristensen@valourlaw.com
Catherine Christensen
Called to the bar: 2015 (AB)
Valour Law
405, 1 Tache St.
St. Albert, Alberta T8N 1B4
Phone: 780-544-2200
Fax: 866-560-9826
Email: cchristensen@valourlaw.com
https://davidraymondamos3.
Monday 26 April 2021
YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON STALKER, all the NATO dudes and
YOU know that I don't send Spam
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: NIA_IG <nia_ig.fct@navy.mil>
> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 11:03:08 +0000
> Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] Fwd: Methinks the evil lawyer Howie
> Cooper made a deal with the VERY NASTY FBI dudes in Beantown N'esy Pas
> Howie Anglin?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Dear David Amos,
> The Naval Intelligence Activity (NIA) Office of the Inspector General
> (IG) reviewed your email and attached .WAV file provided to the NIA
> Hotline on 2 April 2021. I found no connection to the United States
> Navy or United States Naval Intelligence.
>
> Naval Inspectors General exist to improve the efficiency and
> effectiveness of US Navy Programs, and strive to eliminate and prevent
> waste, fraud, and abuse with their respective departments. Naval IGs
> are restricted to assessing matters falling within the purview of
> their respective commanders.
>
> Citing the lack of an apparent connection to the US Navy or Naval
> Intelligence, I am unable to provide further assistance, or provide
> direct referral to any other agency or activity.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Mark Koneda
> Investigator
> Naval Intelligence Activity
> Office of the Inspector General
> NIA_IG@navy.mil
> (301)669-3030 (unclass)
> TSVOIP 560-3030
>
> INSPECTOR GENERAL SENSITIVE INFORMATION - FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY The
> information contained in this email and any accompanying attachments
> may contain Inspector General sensitive or pre-decisional information,
> which is protected from mandatory disclosure under the Freedom of
> Information Act (FOIA, 5 USC Section 552). It should not be released
> to unauthorized persons. If you are not the intended recipient of this
> information, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of
> any action in reliance on this information is prohibited. If you
> received this email in error, please notify this office by email or by
> calling (301) 669-3030.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> Sent: Friday, April 2, 2021 12:50 PM
> To: NIA_IG <nia_ig.fct@navy.mil>
> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Fwd: Methinks the evil lawyer Howie Cooper
> made a deal with the VERY NASTY FBI dudes in Beantown N'esy Pas Howie
> Anglin?
Friday, 2 April 2021
Russia warns NATO against deploying troops to Ukraine
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 15:41:27 -0400
Subject: Attn LGen Wayne Eyre I just called and tried to explain this
email and Federal Court File No T-1557-15 in particular
To: wayne.eyre@forces.gc.ca, george.young@forces.gc.ca,
Vincent.Rigby@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Shelly.Bruce@cse-cst.gc.ca,
daniel.lauzon@international.
alexander.steinhouse@justica.
anne.dawson@hrsdc-rhdcc.gc.ca, marjorie.michel@tbs-sct.gc.ca,
jamie.innes@qpc-cpr.gc.ca, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nt.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, Premier
<PREMIER@novascotia.ca>, media@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Nathalie Sturgeon
<sturgeon.nathalie@
"kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca>, "Richard.Ames"
<Richard.Ames@gnb.ca>, "Richard.Bragdon" <Richard.Bragdon@parl.gc.ca>,
"Ross.Wetmore" <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "rob.moore"
<rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "John.Williamson"
<John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>,
briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>, BrianThomasMacdonald
<BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.
<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee" <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
---------- Original message ----------
From: Art.McDonald@forces.gc.ca
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:08:24 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO JONATHAN.VANCE You have been ducKing e
since 2015 when I was running iN the election of the 42nd Parliament
and suing the Queen in Federal Court Methinks it is YOU who should
finally call me back N'esy Pas?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
The Acting Chief of the Defence Staff is LGen Wayne Eyre, he may be
reached at wayne.eyre@forces.gc.ca.
Le Chef d'état-major de la Défense par intérim est le LGen Wayne Eyre.
Il peut être rejoint au wayne.eyre@forces.gc.ca.
Art McD
He/Him // Il/Lui
Admiral/amiral Art McDonald
Chief of the Defence Staff (CDS)
Canadian Armed Forces
art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca<
Chef d’état-major de la Defense (CÉMD)
Forces armées canadiennes
art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca<
Canadian trade survived the first Trump presidency. Here's how it can survive the second
Industries in Canada know Trump is threatening tariffs, but this time they have a plan
Donald
Trump, who won Tuesday's U.S. presidential election, dances after
speaking at an election night party in West Palm Beach, Fla. The
Republican is returning to the White House with plans to remake the
global trade landscape, which could be a disaster for Canada's economy. (Alex Brandon/The Associated Press)
Here we go again.
Canadian industries are bracing for chaos, discord and, above all, tariffs. Donald Trump's sweeping presidential election victory this week sets the stage for a series of obstacles to trade between Canada and its biggest trading partner.
But for those who spent much of Trump's first term defending Canadian interests in a trade war, there is an eerie sense of déjà vu.
"We have that history and experience to draw on," said Catherine Cobden, president and CEO of the Canadian Steel Producers Association.
Back in 2018, Trump slapped a 25 per cent tariff on steel imports.
Eventually, Canadian negotiators convinced the Republican president to give Canada an exemption. Cobden said Canada is one of the only countries to negotiate a break.
"The reason we determined that tariffs should not exist between Canada and the United States is that we learned they were doing harm on both sides of the border," she told CBC News.
WATCH | How Canadian businesses are reacting to Trump's tariff threats:
How Canadian businesses are reacting to Trump’s tariff threatsSome
of Canada’s biggest industries are already strategizing on how to deal
with U.S. president-elect Donald Trump's threats to impose stiff tariffs
on all goods entering the U.S. Economists say Canada’s GDP could be cut
by as much as five per cent.
Since then, Canada has levied steep tariffs on China and introduced new rules to make it clear where steel is coming from. Both measures, Cobden said, should help make it clear that Canada and the U.S. have more in common than the incoming president may think.
"I'm not going to say I'm hopeful, because there's a bunch of uncertainty. But I do feel like we have an opportunity to take the good work we've done ... and stand up and be united with the United States," she said.
Canadian industry has weathered Trump before
That tactic sounds very familiar to Flavio Volpe, president of Canada's Automotive Parts Manufacturers' Association, who was among those on the front lines of the trade disputes of the first Trump presidency. He said Trump expected the renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement would take six or seven weeks. It took 13 months.
Volpe focused his efforts on highlighting how half the vehicles made in Canada are manufactured by American companies and that half the parts used in that manufacturing process come from the U.S.
"We managed to show them that their interests were better served with us than any other partner that they have," he said this week.
Canada's auto industry, steel companies, aluminum producers and the dairy industry have weathered this storm before. But now, even industries that made it through the last Trump presidency without much disruption are worried.
Grain farmers have been hit by steep Chinese tariffs in response to Canada's decision to impose its own tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles.
China is Canada's second-biggest export market for grain. The biggest, of course, is the U.S., and now farmers are eyeing the possibility of Trump's 10 per cent tariff.
"Any type of distortion in that trade with our American counterparts will have a direct impact on the 65,000 grain farmers whose livelihoods are all across the country," said Kyle Larkin, executive director of the Grain Growers Association of Canada.
Grain farmers export more than eight million tonnes to the U.S. every year, worth nearly $9.5 billion Cdn.
"The relationship between Canada and the U.S. is not only important for grain farmers, not only important for agriculture, but also important for the Canadian economy at large," Larkin said.
The threat of tariffs as leverage
Add to all that the looming renegotiation of the new NAFTA, now called the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) in 2026.
For all the angst and concern about those negotiations, trade in the continent has flourished since the deal was renewed in 2019.
"As of last year, total exports between Canada, U.S. and Mexico topped $1.5 trillion Cdn, nearly 30 per cent higher than 2019 levels," wrote TD Bank economist Marc Ercolao.
One issue at the core of Trump's trade policy is disagreement over whether the incoming U.S. president actually understands how tariffs work. Trump repeatedly claims they are paid by countries of origin. In fact, tariffs are paid by consumers who buy the imported products.
"I don't think he got it on who pays the tariff, but I don't think he cared," Volpe said. "He knew that by making that threat, we'd come to the table with some concessions. That was the important piece."
So, he said, the key is understanding how Trump uses the threat of tariffs as leverage.
The Grain Growers Association said the key is "prudent and patient engagement."
No one knows what's going to happen between now and inauguration day, Larkin said, and no one knows which industries will fall into the next administration's cross-hairs.
But, he said, we do know the review of CUSMA is coming fast.
WATCH | Canada's economy could be in for a rough ride with Trump's tariff plan:
Trump's tariff plan poses threat to Canadian trade, says economistJimmy
Jean, chief economist for Desjardins, says U.S. president-elect Donald
Trump's plan for across-the-board tariffs on imports could spark a trade
dispute and disrupt the Canadian economy.
"[The] free-trade agreement really holds all of our trade and the livelihoods of grain farmers with it. So we need to be aware of that, and we need to engage early, and we need to engage often," Larkin said.
On that front, Volpe said changes in the political landscape in this country are important as well. When Trump wanted to renegotiate NAFTA during his first term, he said, Canada came to the table with a multi-partisan approach, including former prime ministers and current opposition members.
"I think our politics here have gotten a little bit more polarized. I hope that we can do that part. That was a very, very important part," Volpe said.
For all of the challenges, industry leaders say, there's a path forward — and every reason to believe that Canada can navigate whatever obstacles are coming.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
369 Comments
David Amos
I you wanna make Trump laugh tell him your plans
No comments:
Post a Comment