Friday, 19 March 2021

SPYING ON CITIZENS

703 696 5342 Dana Pierce Cunning the day after April Fools Day 2021


David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 2:36 PM
To: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Bcc: myson333 <myson333@yahoo.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 13:59:43 -0300
Subject: Fwd: YO Dominic Leblanc I figured you may enoy a little Deja
Vu from old news and from your cousin Chucky Leblanc's old blog on
April Fools Day 2006
To: NIA_IG@navy.mil
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 02:40:23 -0300
Subject: YO Dominic Leblanc I figured you may enoy a little Deja Vu
from old news and from your cousin Chucky Leblanc's old blog on April
Fools Day 2006
To: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, Dominic.Leblanc@parl.gc.ca, "Ian.Shugart"
<Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, ministryofjustice
<ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.fin"
<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming"
<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Cote" <Gilles.Cote@gnb.ca>,
police <police@fredericton.ca>, "dan. bussieres"
<dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>, martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca, "Juanita.Peddle"
<Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
<Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
"Lucie.Dubois" <Lucie.Dubois@gnb.ca>, "luc.labonte"
<luc.labonte@gnb.ca>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, "Jacques.Poitras"
<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "macpherson.don"
<macpherson.don@dailygleaner.com>, xtofury@gmail.com, Nathalie
Sturgeon <sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, "Nathalie.Drouin"
<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey"
<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Barbara.Whitenect"
<Barbara.Whitenect@gnb.ca>, "Mike.Comeau" <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>,
"Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, briangallant10
<briangallant10@gmail.com>, Brian Ruhe <brian@brianruhe.ca>,
"Paul.Lynch" <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>, paul
<paul@paulfromm.com>, "Paul.Harpelle" <Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333@gmail.com, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.bc.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nt.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, PREMIER
<PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "Holland,
Mike (LEG)" <mike.holland@gnb.ca>

Methinks your old buddy Fernand Robichaud is crying as he watches your
hero Jean Chrétien get caught with his pants down again exactly 18
years after the Yankees tried to pull that extraordinary rendition
nonsense on me while you dudes laughed at my troubles N'esy Pas

HMMM

https://ipolitics.ca/2019/02/08/snc-lavalin-affair-evokes-humiliation-of-sponsorship-scandal-in-quebec/

SNC-Lavalin affair evokes ‘humiliation’ of sponsorship scandal in Quebec
By Martin Patriquin. Published on Feb 8, 2019 4:56pm

    'Once again, and despite umpteen promises to the contrary, the
Liberal Party of Canada has allegedly attempted to force its way into
Quebec’s good graces through backroom deals and old-fashioned
political interference.'

I bet that I am not the only one who smells SNC Lavelin within this
stinky backroom dealing EH Madame Jody Wilson-Raybould???

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/chretien-nuclear-waste-project-1.5971996

Former prime minister Jean Chrétien part of secretive project to store
nuclear waste in Labrador, emails show

Chrétien defends project, saying Canada, as supplier of uranium, has
responsibility to dispose of it
Marie-Maude Denis, Jacques Taschereau, Daniel Tremblay  · CBC News ·
Posted: Apr 01, 2021 4:00 AM ET

 

 

https://twitter.com/DavidRaymondAm1/with_replies 

 

David Raymond Amos
Replying to @DavidRaymondAm1 @Nyonitz and 49 others
Methinks all media people on both sides of the 49th should sit up and pay attention to what the LIEbranos and their Yankee cohorts have been up too N'esy Pas?
 
 

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2021/03/spying-on-citizens.html

 
 
#CORRUPTION #cdnpoli

  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcnfozXBxCI

 


SPYING ON CITIZENS: Trudeau & U.S. Navy pay defence contractors to spy on Rebel News

30,826 views
Premiered 18 hours ago

http://www.StopSpyingOnUs.com The U.S. Navy teamed up with defence contractors at the University of Arkansas and the Canadian Special Operations Forces Command under Prime Minister Trudeau's defence minister Harjit Sajjan, commissioning a report to spy on Rebel News. Ezra Levant explains their operation.
 

1,433 Comments

 

Rebel News
Go to http://www.StopSpyingUs.com and check out the spy reports we were able to find. And if you want to help us out, please make a donation on that page too, unlike the defence department, we don't take any money from the government, we rely on the generosity of our audience to help keep us going!
 
 
Methinks Ezzy Baby and the Feds on both sides of the 49th should start checking my work ASAP N'esy Pas? 
 
 
David Amos
GO FIGURE What is within my emails and blogs or who and what I talk about on the phone This Public Infomation Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics 42nd PARLIAMENT EVIDENCE Tuesday, October 30, 2018 Mr. Michael Fenrick (Constitutional and Legal Adviser, National Board of Directors, Liberal Party of Canada): "For our part, many of the same things that Mr. Bailey has spoken to apply equally with respect to the Liberal Party and its treatment of personal information. From the perspective of somebody outside the system gaining access, we regularly run training. We've developed a cybersecurity policy, and we regularly run training at all levels of the organization, in terms of trying to ensure that people are educated about how to avoid things like phishing scams, spoof email addresses and matters along those lines. In addition to that, the Liberal Party's national director and the team at the head office here in Ottawa have met with the CSE in order to discuss best practices on how to secure Canadians' information. That includes using cloud-based email servers, which is what is recommended by the CSE. That has been implemented."
 
 
David Amos
"POOF"
YO Ezzy Baby I called your office and left a message Trust that I will be updating my blog about your revelation this weekend  
 
 
 
David Amos
I made 3 comments not 2 Correct??? 
 
 

 
 
 

Justin Trudeau hired a U.S. defence contractor to spy on Rebel News

 
By Ezra Levant  

Who is the greatest military threat to Canada?

  • Is it China?
  • Is it Al Qaeda, ISIS or the Taliban?
  • Or maybe it’s Russia?

Well, according to Justin Trudeau and his defence minister, Harjit Sajjan, it’s us: Rebel News.

The United State Department of Defense and the Canadian Armed Forces, have both funded a joint cyber intelligence operation against Rebel News.

So here’s how it worked:

The U.S. Navy funded the University of Arkansas at Little Rock, to use a program called “SpyonWeb,” to do a work-up on Rebel News. And they produced this report, called the Canada Elections Cyber Forensics Analysis, on October 10, 2019.

Which is quite something, given that the election wasn’t actually until 11 days later. But as you’ll soon see, they knew what they were going to write before they did their “research.”

It’s very, very creepy to be spied on by the U.S. Navy. 

It probably isn’t against the law for the U.S. government to spy on me — I’m not an American citizen. I’m one of the most pro-American, pro-NATO journalists in Canada. Which is probably why navy intelligence hates me.

But what about the Canadian Armed Forces? I’m a Canadian citizen, and I have the right to be free of warrantless searches and seizures. The Canadian Armed Forces have a mandate to fight Canada’s enemies — not spy on Canada’s journalists.

So why did Harjit Sajjan then take this study —  and fund these Arkansas spies — and have them publish it in Canada?

The study published in Canada claimed to have identified 75 unique YouTube channels, but for the purpose of “brevity” in the report they would just be focusing on Rebel News.

They’re lying. They didn’t study 75 channels. They studied one. The one that they were specifically told to spy on. They just threw in those other 74 to make it look like they weren’t spying on conservatives.

I wonder if anyone will care. If we were a left-wing channel, and Donald Trump were spying on us, would anyone care?

What do you think?

We have access to information requests in to both Queen’s University, which reprinted this smear, and to the University of Arkansas, which really, really doesn’t want to hand over their instructions.

Unlike the CBC, we don't get a billion dollars a year so if you can chip in to help cover our costs and fight back against the lies we would appreciate it.


Canadians can donate through e-transfer by emailing donations@rebelnews.com please use the password RebelNews if necessary.

Quick PayPal donations can be made here: https://www.paypal.me/RebelNews

And you can donate by cheque by making it out to Rebel News and mailing the cheque to:

Rebel News Network Ltd.
PO Box 61056 Eglinton/Dufferin RO
Toronto, ON M6E 5B2


View the reports and email exchanges below:

 
 

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Mail - DHS/CISA releases "Election Disinformation Toolkit"

 1/14/21, 8!19 PM     

                  Nitin Agarwal nxagarwal@ualr.edu              

 

DHS/CISA releases "Election Disinformation Toolkit"

 

Nitin Agarwal <nxagarwal@ualr.edu> Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 2:40 PM

To: "Rebecca Goolsby Ph.D" <rebecca.goolsby@navy.mil>

Hi Rebecca,

Thanks for sharing.

On a related note - our Canadian Election Online Influence Campaigns study was recently published in the Journal of Future Conflict by Queens College Department of Psychology in cooperation with the Centre for Security, Armed Forces and Society (CSAFS) at the Department of Politics of the Royal Military College (RMC) of Canada, the Special Operations Forces Command (CANSOFCOM) Education and Research Centre (ERC) as well as with support from Defence Research and Development Canada (DRDC).

The full article is available at: https://www.queensu.ca/psychology/sites/webpublish.queensu.ca.psycwww/files/files/Journal%20of%20Future%20Conflict/Issue%202%20Fall%202020/Issue_2-Galeano.pdf

Best,

Nitin

 

> On Oct 2, 2020, at 2:32 PM, Goolsby, Rebecca L CIV USN CNR ARLINGTON VA (USA)

<rebecca.goolsby@navy.mil> wrote:

> FYSA

> From: Levis, Adela <LevisA@state.gov>

> Sent: Friday, October 02, 2020 12:54 PM

> To: Levis, Adela <LevisA@state.gov>

> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] DHS/CISA releases "Election Disinformation Toolkit"

> Dear Academic and Think-Tank Colleagues,

> you may be interested in the DHS/CISA released "Election Disinformation Toolkit"

> Here's a direct link to the two-page document: https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/election-disinformation-toolkit_508.pdf

> Adela Levis

> Academic and Think-Tank Liaison

> Global Engagement Center

> U.S. Department of State

> Levisa@state.gov

> linkedin.com/in/adelalevis/

> Top 10 U.S. Government Counter Disinformation & Propaganda Academic & Think-Tank Research Topics

> GEC Mission: “To direct, lead, synchronize, integrate, and coordinate efforts of the Federal Government to recognize, understand, expose, and counter foreign state and foreign non-state propaganda and disinformation efforts aimed at undermining or influencing the policies, security, or stability of the United States, its allies, and partner nations.”

 

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0"ik=6822d00127&view=pt&search=...3A1679470265452536537&dsqt=1&simpl=msg-f%3A1679470265452536537 Page 1 of 2

 

> From: Levis, Adela <LevisA@state.gov>

> Sent: Friday, September 25, 2020 1:05 PM

> Subject: FBI/DHS-CISA 2020 Election Security PSAs

> Dear Academic and Think-Tank Colleagues,

> The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) are issuing announcements about FOREIGN ACTORS AND CYBER CRIMINALS LIKELY TO SPREAD DISINFORMATION REGARDING 2020 U.S. ELECTION RESULTS. This and other announcements are intend to raise awareness of the potential threat posed by attempts to spread disinformation regarding the results of the 2020 U.S. elections.

> You may find these Public Service Announcements a potentially useful resource for your work - they can be found here: https://www.ic3.gov/media/default.aspx

> It's my understanding that there will be additional ones posted in the coming days/weeks.

> Warm regards,

> Adela

> Adela Levis

> Academic and Think-Tank Liaison

> Global Engagement Center

> U.S. Department of State

> Levisa@state.gov

> linkedin.com/in/adelalevis/

> Top 10 U.S. Government Counter Disinformation & Propaganda Academic & Think-Tank Research Topics

> GEC Mission: “To direct, lead, synchronize, integrate, and coordinate efforts of the Federal Government to recognize, understand, expose, and counter foreign state and foreign non-state propaganda and disinformation efforts aimed at undermining or influencing the policies, security, or stability of the United States, its allies, and partner nations.”

 

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0"ik=6822d00127&view=pt&search=...A1679470265452536537&dsqt=1&simpl=msg-f%3A1679470265452536537 Page 2 of 2

 
 

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Mail - Deep fakes (of websites) in Canadian elections 1/14/21, 8!39 PM

 

                            Nitin Agarwal nxagarwal@ualr.edu              

 

Deep fakes (of websites) in Canadian elections

 

Rebecca Goolsby <drjoycephd@gmail.com> Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 9:40 AM

To: Nitin Agarwal nxagarwal@ualr.edu

Agreed!

On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 10:38 AM Nitin Agarwal <nxagarwal@ualr.edu> wrote:

> This is more like a coordinated deep fake. I don't think we have seen it heard about this yet!

> --

> http://www.ualr.edu/nxagarwal/ | http://cosmos.ualr.edu/

> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019, 9:17 AM Rebecca Goolsby <drjoycephd@gmail.com> wrote:

>> 

>> GREAT WORK. MANY THANKS

>> > Hi Rebecca,

>> >

>> > Please see the report on cyber forensic analysis of http://therebel.media website. Both MSWord and PDF versions are attached. The analysis revealed a new cyber IO tactic of deep fakes for websites at play. A collection of fake websites (at least 291) were deployed to amplify the narrative that Trudeau is not a friend of the Canadian-Indian

>> >

>> > Please let me know if you have any questions.

>> >

>> > Thanks,

>> > Nitin

 

V/R Rebecca

 

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0"ik=6822d00127&view=pt&search=…A1648739032309485889&dsqt=1&simpl=msg-f%3A1648739032309485889

Page 1 of 1

 
 

 Trust that I called these reporters too starting with Dale Smith

 https://looniepolitics.com/contact/

 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUSyKvu1vg8&t=5s

 


Dale Smith's Update: 03-08-2021

30 views
Mar 8, 2021
 
Dale Smith provides his comments on the Liberal government's problem with their legislative agenda.
 
I called you and left a voicemail Correct??? 
 
 
 
Acton, Barry613-799-1373 Freelance
Binkley, Alex 613-749-7633   Freelance, 152 Ivy Crescent
Braune, Gerhard 613-236-1856   Freelance, 27 Clegg St.
Buzzetti, Hélène 613-688-4011   Freelance, 503-150 Wellington
Guly, Christopher 613-256-9595   Freelance, 1640 Corkery Road, Carp
Gzowski, Michael 613-204-8999   Freelance, 53, rue Chartrand, Gatineau
Johal, Satpaul Singh 613-969-6508   Freelance, 1276 Perez Cres.
Lake, Holly 613-222-9801   Freelance
Lum, Zi-Ann 613-670-5836   Freelance
MacKinnon, Leslie 613-730-5800   Freelance, 503 150 Wellington
Maher, Stephen 613-299-5173   Freelance, 503 150 Wellington
Munson, James 613-327-1372   Freelance
Pole, Kenneth, A. 613-282-7270   Freelance, 1950 Highridge Ave.
Raj, Althia 613-670-5837   Freelance
Smith, Dale 613-276-0054   Freelance, 17-250 O'Connor
Unrau, Jason613-899-9599 Freelance
 
 
613-992-2919
705-268-6464  No answer so I left a message for Dale

613-992-4766
613-998-1860  Sneay ady answered put me o old for 1o minutes then played dumb

613-995-8913
519-741-2001  No answer left a voicemail

613-992-2639
418-836-0970  Nic lady answered who remembered me

613-992-0253 I talked to Mikey and he remembered me well
905-886-9911  

613-947-4524 No answer left a voicemail
250-787-1192 I talked to his assistant first thing Friday morning and she played dumb but was quick to point out I said Zimmer's name wrong
 
 
 
 
 

Russia to expel 10 US diplomats in response to Biden actions

Putin

FILE - In this Thursday, April 1, 2021 file photo, Russian President Vladimir Putin listens to Russian Human Rights ombudsman Tatyana Moskalkova during their meeting in the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia. Hit by a barrage of new sanctions from the Biden administration, the Kremlin is carefully weighing its response in a tense showdown with the United States. (Alexei Druzhinin, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP, File)


Vladimir Isachenkov, The Associated Press
Published Friday, April 16, 2021 2:43PM EDT

MOSCOW - Russia on Friday responded to a barrage of new U.S. sanctions by saying it would expel 10 U.S. diplomats and take other retaliatory moves in a tense showdown with Washington.

Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov also said Moscow will add eight U.S. officials to its sanctions list and move to shut down those U.S. nongovernment organizations that remain in Russia to end what he described as their meddling in Russia's politics.

The top Russian diplomat said the Kremlin suggested that U.S. Ambassador John Sullivan follow the example of his Russian counterpart and head home for consultations. Russia will also move to deny the U.S. Embassy the possibility to hire personnel from Russia and third countries as support staff, limit visits by U.S. diplomats serving short-term stints at the embassy, and tighten requirements for U.S. diplomats' travel in the country.

On Thursday, the Biden administration announced sanctions on Russia for interfering in the 2020 U.S. presidential election and involvement in the SolarWind hack of federal agencies - activities Moscow has denied. The U.S. ordered 10 Russian diplomats expelled, targeted dozens of companies and people, and imposed new curbs on Russia's ability to borrow money.

While the U.S. wields the power to cripple the Russian economy, Moscow lacks levers to respond in kind, although it potentially could hurt American interests in many other ways around the globe.

Lavrov called Washington's move “absolutely unfriendly and unprovoked,” and he said that while Russia could take “painful measures” against American business interests in Russia, it wouldn't immediately move to do that and “save them for future use.”

He warned that if Washington moves to further raise the pressure, Russia might ask the U.S. to reduce the number of its embassy and consular staff from about 450 to 300. He said Russia and the U.S. each have about 450 diplomats, but for Russia the number includes some 150 U.N. personnel that he argued shouldn't be part of the equation.

Russia's economic potential and its global reach are limited compared with the Soviet Union that competed with the U.S for international influence during the Cold War. Still, Russia's nuclear arsenal and its leverage in many parts of the world make it a power that Washington needs to reckon with.

Aware of that, President Joe Biden called for de-escalating tensions and held the door open for co-operation with Russia in certain areas. Biden said he told Putin in Tuesday's call that he chose not to impose tougher sanctions for now and proposed to meet in a third country in the summer.

Lavrov said Russia had a “positive attitude” to the summit offer and was analyzing it, but a statement issued by the Foreign Ministry shortly after noted that it ”was being studied in the context of the evolving situation.“

The ministry charged that Russia would like to avoid further escalation and engage in a “calm and professional dialogue,” but has other means to retaliate if Washington tries to crank up the pressure.

While the new U.S. sanctions further limited Russia's ability to borrow money by banning U.S. financial institutions from buying Russian government bonds directly from state institutions, they didn't target the secondary market.

“It's very important that there're no sanctions on secondary debt because that means that non-U.S. persons can buy the debt and sell it to the U.S. persons,” said Tom Adshead, director of research at Macro-Advisory Ltd, an analytics and advisory company.

Timothy Frye, a Columbia University political scientist, noted that the Biden administration chose not to increase sanctions against the prospective Nord Stream 2 natural gas pipeline to Germany or go after large Russian state-controlled companies.

“That's part of the broader strategy of using sanctions but also reaching out to the Kremlin to propose talks on strategic stability and eventually on a summit,” he said.

Tougher restrictions would also hurt Western businesses, inflict significant economic pain on the Russian population and allow Putin to rally anti-U.S. sentiments to shore up his rule.

Ramping up sanctions could eventually drive Russia into a corner and provoke even more reckless Kremlin action, such as a potential escalation in Ukraine, which has recently faced a surge in clashes with Russia-backed separatists in the east and a massive Russian troops buildup across the border.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was in Paris on Friday to discuss the tensions with French President Emmanuel Macron. After a joint call with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, the three urged Russia to pull its troops back from the border to de-escalate the situation.

Zelenskyy welcomed a prospective Biden-Putin summit. “When such important countries don't talk, others suffer,” he said.

Fyodor Lukyanov, a top foreign policy expert who leads the Moscow-based Council for Foreign and Defence Policies, predicted Putin would likely accept Biden's invitation to join next week's call on climate change but could drag his feet on accepting the summit offer.

“There is no way to make any deals,” Lukyanov said. “There is a mutual antipathy and a total lack of trust.”

He charged that the only practical outcome of the summit could be an agreement to launch long and difficult talks on a replacement to the New START nuclear reduction agreement that Russia and the U.S. extended in February for another five years.

Lukyanov noted that the growing U.S. pressure will push Russia and China closer in the long run.

“Closer co-operation with China on co-ordinating actions to contain the United States will develop more quickly now as the Chinese are interested in that,” he said. While Russia lacks tools for a symmetrical answer to the U.S. sanctions, “it has ample capabilities to stimulate changes in the world order,” he added.

Konstantin Kosachev, the Kremlin-connected deputy speaker of the upper house of parliament, said that by hitting Russia with sanctions and proposing a summit at the same time, the U.S. sought to take a commanding stance.

“Russia's consent would be interpreted as a reflection of its desire to soften the sanctions, allowing the U.S. to secure a dominant position at the meeting, while our refusal to meet would be a convenient pretext for more punitive measures,” Kosachev wrote on Facebook.

He argued that Russia should not rush to accept Biden's summit offer.

“Revenge is a dish best served cold,” Kosachev wrote. “I believe the saying is quite adaptable to a situation when we talk not about revenge but a due answer to aggressive action by an opponent.”

Some predicted the U.S. sanctions could discourage Russia from co-operating with the U.S. on international crises.

“The Russian position will grow tougher on Syria, the Iranian nuclear deal and other issues,” Ivan Timofeev, program director at Russian International Affairs Council, said in a commentary. Instead of acting as a deterrent, he warned, the sanctions would “only anger Russia and make its policy even tougher.”

But despite the soaring tensions, Russia and the U.S. have shared interests in many global hot spots. For example, Moscow fears that instability could spread from Afghanistan to former Soviet republics in Central Asia, and it is interested in a political settlement there.

As for Iran, Moscow also doesn't want to see it with nuclear weapons, despite its friendly ties with Tehran.

Lukyanov said Russia wouldn't try to use global hot spots to hurt the U.S. and would wait patiently to see them erode U.S. domination.

“It's not a matter of playing the spoiler here or there,” he said. “The ongoing developments will help accelerate the process of consolidation of leading powers against the U.S. domination.”

--

Associated Press writers Eric Tucker in Washington and Kostya Manenkov contributed.



 
 
 

Defense

U.S. drops plans to send destroyers into the Black Sea due to concerns over Russia

The tentative transit was not unusual or designed to send any particular new signal, an official familiar with the plans said.

 
The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Roosevelt arrives in Souda Bay, Greece, for a logistics and maintenance period. | U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Kelly M. Agee/Released

The Pentagon has scrapped a potential Black Sea transit by two Navy destroyers this week due to concerns about escalating tensions between Russia and Ukraine, according to two U.S. officials familiar with the plans.

Earlier this month, the Navy notified Turkey, which manages traffic through the Bosporus and Dardanelles straits leading to the Black Sea under the 1936 Montreux Convention, that they were tentatively planning a routine transit by the two destroyers, according to a U.S. defense official.

The tentative transit, first reported by CNN, was not unusual or designed to send any particular new signal, as the U.S. Navy typically conducts eight or nine such movements per year, the person said.

But after new fighting erupted in Eastern Europe between Ukrainian soldiers and Russian-backed separatists, officials decided not to undertake the transit to avoid needlessly escalating the situation, the person said.

Naval movements are frequently subject to change due to maintenance or shifting operational plans, the person said. This particular transit was scrapped due to a “myriad” of reasons, including a desire not to provoke Moscow during a delicate time, the person said.

Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu said in an interview with NTV TV that the U.S. had notified Turkey on Wednesday that the ships would not be heading to the Black Sea. Reuters first reported that the movement was called off, quoting diplomatic sources who, like Çavuşoğlu, did not provide a specific reason.

The Pentagon has declined to discuss the possible transit since the reports first surfaced. “We routinely operate and conduct operations in the Black Sea and throughout the European Command [area of operations],” Pentagon spokesperson John Kirby told reporters last week. “And as you also know, I'm not going to forecast or speak about hypotheticals or about future operations.”

The ships, the USS Donald Cook and the USS Roosevelt, are in the Mediterranean Sea conducting maritime security operations, the person said. They were still a few days from the Black Sea when the decision was made to scrap the transit, so they were not forced to abruptly reverse course.

But some in Kyiv were disappointed that the destroyers would not be traveling to the Black Sea after all, said a former senior Ukrainian official. The show of force from the U.S. in the region would have been welcomed as Russia continues to amass thousands of troops at the eastern Ukrainian border, this person said.

Ukrainian officials are also tracking Russian movements suggesting a buildup along the Kerch Strait Bridge to Crimea. The strait connects the Black Sea to the Sea of Azov, and officials are wary of Russia moving to block access to the Black Sea and link its mainland to Crimea.

Ukraine's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said on Thursday that Russia announced it would be closing part of the Black Sea near the Kerch Strait for foreign warships until October, under the pretense of conducting military exercises. A spokesperson said Russia's actions violate international law and reiterated that Ukraine "has the right to regulate shipping in these waters of the Black Sea."

And NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said Wednesday during a joint press conference with Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and Secretary of State Antony Blinken that the organization has increased its military presence in the Black Sea region, including with additional air policing and naval presence.

“We are committed to assisting Ukraine with its self-defense needs,” he said.

Still, the situation is escalating quickly: Russia has sent more than 85,000 troops to the border in recent weeks, and at least seven Ukrainian soldiers have been killed since late last month amid a spike in violence in the Donbass region. Ukrainian government forces have been battling Russia-backed separatists there since 2014.

The G-7 foreign ministers — representing Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, the United States and the European Union — condemned Russia's buildup on Ukraine's borders in a Monday statement, saying they were "deeply concerned" by the move.

"These large-scale troop movements, without prior notification, represent threatening and destabilising activities," they wrote. "We call on Russia to cease its provocations and to immediately de-escalate tensions in line with its international obligations."

Meanwhile, Pentagon leaders have been eyeing the Russian military buildup along the border with Ukraine as well as increased Russian activity at sea and in the air.

The commander of U.S. forces in Europe on Thursday predicted there is a "low to medium" likelihood that Russia will invade Ukraine over the next several weeks.

Gen. Tod Wolters, the head of U.S. European Command and NATO's supreme allied commander in Europe, gave the terse assessment during a House Armed Services Committee hearing on military posture on the continent.

"It is of great concern and our vigilance is high," the four-star general testified, noting sizable upticks in Russian ground, air and maritime forces.

Pressed on whether the threat of a Russian invasion would increase or decrease outside of the coming few weeks, however, Wolters suggested the threat of an incident could subside given the trends his command observes.

"It depends ... on the disposition of the forces," Wolters said. "My sense is, with the trend that I see right now, the likelihood of an occurrence will start to wane."

Connor O'Brien contributed to this report.
 

United States Secretary of Defense
United States Department of Defense Seal.svg
Seal of the Department[1]
Flag of the United States Secretary of Defense.svg
Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III (50885754687).jpg
Incumbent
Lloyd Austin

since January 22, 2021
United States Department of Defense
Office of the Secretary of Defense
StyleMr. Secretary
(informal)
The Honorable
(formal)
StatusLeader and chief executive
AbbreviationSecDef
Member ofCabinet
National Security Council
Reports toPresident of the United States
SeatThe Pentagon, Arlington County, Virginia
AppointerThe President
with Senate advice and consent
Term lengthNo fixed term
 
Austin joined the board of Raytheon Technologies, a military contractor, in April 2016.[40][41] As of October 2020, his Raytheon stock holdings were worth roughly $500,000 and his compensation, including stock, totaled $1.4 million.[40] On September 18, 2017, he was appointed to Nucor's board of directors.[42] On May 29, 2018, Austin was appointed as an independent director on the board of Tenet Healthcare.[43] He also operates a consulting firm and has been a partner at Pine Island Capital, an investment company with which Antony Blinken and Michèle Flournoy are affiliated
 







 
Secretary of the Navy
Seal of the United States Department of the Navy.svg
Seal of the Department of the Navy
Flag of the United States Secretary of the Navy.svg
Flag of the Secretary of the Navy
Thomas W. Harker official photo.jpg
Incumbent
Thomas W. Harker
(Acting)

since 20 January 2021
Department of the Navy
StyleMister Secretary
The Honorable (formally)
AbbreviationSECNAV
Reports toSecretary of Defense
Deputy Secretary of Defense
AppointerThe President,
with Senate advice and consent
Formation18 June 1798; 222 years ag 
 
 

 
 

Our mission is to inspect, investigate, or inquire into any and all matters of importance to the Department of the Navy and maintain the highest level of public confidence. We are the conscience of the Navy. We make a difference, adding value at all levels through proactive assistance, advice, and advocacy. Our guiding principle is to support the Department of the Navy in maintaining the highest level of integrity and public confidence.

We Will:

  • Provide candid, objective and uninhibited analysis and advice.
  • Emphasize integrity, ethics and discipline.
  • Promote efficiency, effectiveness and readiness.
  • Conduct our activities with the highest standards of ethical leadership and professionalism.
  • Advocate for quality of life for Sailors, Marines, their families and Department of the Navy civilian employees.
  • Exercise fairness, impartiality and timeliness in accomplishing our mission.

Local Inspectors General

When filing a complaint, your local Inspector General office should be your first point of contact.

Naval Inspector General

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

The Office of Naval Inspector General for the United States Department of the Navy was established during World War II to make investigations as directed by the Secretary of the Navy and the Chief of Naval Operations. The current mission of the Naval Inspector General is "to inspect, investigate, or inquire into matters of importance to the Department of the Navy and maintain the highest level of public confidence".[1]

History

In February 1942, while undergoing conversion in New York harbor, USS Lafayette caught fire and subsequently capsized. in addition to one person being killed in the disaster, the loss of such a prestigious and well-known ship was a tremendous embarrassment to the Navy. Congress launched an investigation into the disaster to determine if the ship's loss was an act of foreign sabotage or merely negligence. In its report, Congress expressed frustration with the multiple investigative agencies within the Navy. The committee felt that the Navy Department needed an office of Inspector General to "be charged with the duty of keeping Congress and the Secretary of the Navy informed as to the conditions of the naval service.[2]

Secretary of the Navy Frank Knox established the Office of Naval Inspector General (NIG) on 18 May 1942 with General Order 173. Initially, the Naval Inspector General was part of the staff of the Commander in Chief, United States Fleet.[3] The initial staff included one deputy and three assistant inspectors. The office served throughout World War II as a 'troubleshooting' unit for the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) by conducting inquiries and reporting on all matters which affected the efficiency and economy of the Navy; and by conducting inspections and investigations into any naval matter as required by the Secretary of the Navy, CNO, Congress, or by law.[2]

The Goldwater-Nichols Act in 1986 transferred the NIG from the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations to the Office of the Secretary of the Navy

 

https://www.oni.navy.mil/About/Inspector-General/  

 

United States Navy
Naval Inspector General
Emblem of the Naval Inspector General.jpg
Vice Adm. Richard P. Snyder.jpg
Incumbent
Vice Admiral Richard P. Snyder

since 1 August 2018
FormationJune 1942
First holderCharles P. Snyder
WebsiteOfficial Website 

Inspector General (IG)


The Naval Intelligence Activity (NIA) Office of Inspector General (IG) is the designated agent that receives and investigates allegations of fraud, waste, and abuse for the Naval Intelligence Enterprise (NIE), comprising the NIA, the Office of Naval Intelligence, and subordinate commands.  The IG depends upon the NIE military and civilian workforce, contractors, and the public to report their concerns regarding suspected fraud, waste, abuse and gross mismanagement involving the NIE.

 

Everyone is encouraged to be vigilant to the possibility of fraud, waste, abuse, and related improprieties and to report these suspicions to the IG.

The IG is also the designated NIE agent for initial receipt of allegations of Intelligence Oversight (IO) violations involving the NIE.  For more information on IO, please see the Department of Defense Senior Intelligence Oversight Official’s site at http://dodsioo.defense.gov.

Please contact the IG to report a concern via telephone, via email, in person, or you can call the IG Hotline and leave a recorded message. If calling the Hotline, 301-669-3030, please provide as much detailed information as possible. Please include as many of the "6W’s" as possible:

  1. Who: (Full name, position title, command/agency where the person(s) involved work)
  2. What: (What do you believe is wrong or inappropriate?)
  3. When: (Dates and times when the issues arose or were observed)
  4. Where: (Place where the issue is occurring, including specific building/room numbers or site locations)
  5. Why: (In your opinion, why do you believe this is wrong?)
  6. Witnesses: (Who else knows about this, or could provide additional information on the matter?)

Any information you report will be treated as confidential, but you may also report information anonymously. We would greatly appreciate contact information in case there are follow-up questions and information needed. We will not ask for any personal information, or your reasons for reporting, only information pertaining to the complaint. You may also submit a complaint via fax or email.

 
 

Inspector General
Office of Naval Intelligence
4251 Suitland Road
Washington, DC 20395 
24/7 Telephone Hotline: 301-669-3030
FAX: 301-669-3088 
 
 
 
 

Canada set to benefit as NATO considers compensation for military deployments


Published Monday, February 15, 2021 1:51PM EST
 
canadian military

A Canadian flag patch is shown on the shoulder of a member of the Canadian forces at CFB Trenton, in Trenton, Ont., on Thursday, Oct. 16, 2014. (THE CANADIAN PRESS/Lars Hagberg)

OTTAWA -- The head of NATO is proposing member states be compensated for contributing troops to some alliance missions, saying it is unfair that countries like Canada must bear all the costs when participating in operations that benefit the entire organization.

Yet NATO secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg also expects all members, including Canada, to make good on their commitments to spend more on their militaries in the face of growing instability throughout the world.

Stoltenberg made the comments during a virtual news conference from Brussels on Monday, ahead of a meeting of NATO defence ministers where his plan to compensate countries that send troops abroad will be one of several topics up for debate

Defence ministers are also expected to discuss the futures of Afghanistan and Iraq, where Canada has been slowly withdrawing troops after nearly seven years fighting the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, as well as the threat posed by China and Russia.

It will be the first such meeting since U.S. President Joe Biden's inauguration, which has resulted in high hopes for smoother relations between the transatlantic alliance and the White House after four bruising years under Donald Trump.

Canada stands to benefit from any move to compensate members for what the alliance describes as "core deterrence and defence activities" on alliance territory, namely for the deployment of hundreds of troops to Latvia.

Stoltenberg noted Canada's contributions to Latvia, where the Canadian military is leading a NATO alliance battlegroup whose mission is to deter Russian aggression in the region, as he painted his proposal as an issue of fairness.

"I strongly believe that it will be fair if the country that deployed troops does not cover all the costs, but that NATO, that we pay together, that we fund together, more of the costs," Stoltenberg said in response to a question from The Canadian Press.

"We should increase funding for deterrence and defence activities like the Canadian-led battlegroup in Latvia with our NATO budgets, because now we have a system where those countries that provide the troops also cover all the costs."

The NATO leader also suggested his proposal would strengthen the bonds among NATO's 28 member states by having them all put skin in the game when it comes to missions, and be another way to measure how members contribute to the alliance.

Stoltenberg's proposal would not apply to Canadian deployments outside of NATO's borders, including its contribution of troops to help train the Iraqi military.

NATO in recent years has largely assessed whether individual countries are contributing to the alliance's strength by measuring them against a promise all members made in 2014 to spend two per cent of their gross domestic product on defence.

Yet while Canada joined other members in agreeing to that target, it has consistently spent less than 1.5 per cent of GDP on the military and has no plan to meet the two per cent threshold. Instead, it has argued for other ways to measure contributions.

That includes assessing the degree to which it and other members contribute to NATO missions.

Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan's office was noncommittal when asked about the proposal on Monday.

"With respect to the use of common funding to support NATO deployments, we look forward to discussing secretary-general Stoltenberg's NATO2030 vision at the NATO defence ministerial later this week," Sajjan spokesman Todd Lane said in an email.

Yet NATO Association of Canada president Robert Baines said Stoltenberg's proposal appears to reflect Ottawa's argument that the two per cent target alone isn't a good way to measure how countries are contributing to the alliance.

"And I'm sure Canada will welcome it tremendously," Baines said.

NATO figures published in October predicted that Canada would spend 1.45 per cent of its GDP on the military in 2020, the highest share of the national economy in at least a decade.

Yet while that is partly a reflection of recent increases in defence spending, it was also because of the economic damage wrought by COVID-19, while the federal Liberal government has no plan to meet the two per cent target in the coming decades.

That is despite repeated pressure from both NATO and successive U.S. governments, including Trump.

"We appreciate the increased defence spending we have seen in Canada," Stoltenberg said. "I expect this to continue."

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 15, 2021.

 
 
https://globalnews.ca/news/5068220/canada-military-mission-iraq-ukraine-extension/
 

Canada extending military deployments to Ukraine until 2022, Iraq until 2021

READ MORE: Ukrainian foreign minister says government determined to take back Crimea from Russia

At the same time, they will also continue their deployment in Iraq for another two years to help stabilize the country against ISIS.

Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan and Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland announced the mission extensions in Ottawa on Monday, describing both as continuations of Canadian leadership and multilateralism. It comes just after the fifth anniversary of Russia annexing Crimea from Ukraine.

WATCH: Putin visits Crimea to mark 5th anniversary of annexation

Click to play video: 'Putin visits Crimea to mark 5th anniversary of annexation' 
Putin visits Crimea to mark 5th anniversary of annexation – Mar 18, 2019

The decision also comes after Canada late last week announced a new round of sanctions against Russia for its attack on Ukrainian naval vessels in the Kerch Strait and its detention of the roughly two dozen sailors on board those vessels in November 2018.

Story continues below advertisement

READ MORE: Canada sanctions Russia over Kerch Strait vessel attack, seizure of 24 Ukrainian sailors

They have yet to be released.

Canada will extend the Canadian Forces’ contribution to the Global Coalition Against Daesh and the NATO mission in Iraq, until the end of March 2021.

Canada has about 500 military members in Iraq, including 200 who are part of a NATO training mission and 120 special forces who have been helping Iraqi forces root out Islamic State insurgents around the northern city of Mosul.

— With files from the Canadian Press.

 
 

 
 
---------- Original message ----------
From: Art.McDonald@forces.gc.ca
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 13:49:10 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the evil lawyer Howie Cooper made a
deal with the VERY NASTY FBI dudes in Beantown N'esy Pas Howie Anglin?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

The Acting Chief of the Defence Staff is LGen Wayne Eyre, he may be
reached at wayne.eyre@forces.gc.ca.

Le Chef d'état-major de la Défense par intérim est le LGen Wayne Eyre.
Il peut être rejoint au wayne.eyre@forces.gc.ca.

Art McD
He/Him // Il/Lui
Admiral/amiral Art McDonald

Chief of the Defence Staff (CDS)
Canadian Armed Forces
art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca<mailto:art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca> / Tel: 613-992-5054

Chef d’état-major de la Defense (CÉMD)
Forces armées canadiennes
art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca<mailto:art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca> / Tél: 613-992-5054


---------- Oiginal message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 01:17:32 +0000
Subject: RE: YO JONATHAN.VANCE RE SPYING ON CITIZENS Methinks your
people should explain a few things to Stevey Boy Harper's little buddy
Howie Anglin and many sneaky Yankees N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Due to the evolving COVID-19 situation, we apologize in advance for
any delay in responding to your enquiry. In the meantime, information
on Canada's COVID-19 Economic Response Plan is available on the
Government of Canada website at
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus> or by
calling 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) or 1-833-784-4397.

Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
En raison de la fluidité de la crise de la COVID-19, il est possible
que nous retardions à vous répondre et nous nous en excusons.
Entre-temps, les informations au sujet du Plan d'intervention
économique du Canada pour répondre à la COVID-19 sont disponibles dans
le site Web du gouvernement du Canada au
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus> ou en
composant le
1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) ou le 1-833-784-4397.
 
 
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 22:16:47 -0300
Subject: YO JONATHAN.VANCE RE SPYING ON CITIZENS Methinks your people
should explain a few things to Stevey Boy Harper's little buddy Howie
Anglin and many sneaky Yankees N'esy Pas?
To: art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca, richard.jolette@forces.gc.ca,
JONATHAN.VANCE@forces.gc.ca, Tammy.Harris@forces.gc.ca,
Jill.Chisholm@justice.gc.ca, Cedric.Aspirault@forces.gc.ca,
Derek.Sloan@parl.gc.ca, Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca,
Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
clare.barry@justice.gc.ca, elder.marques@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca, hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca,
Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, "andrea.anderson-mason"
<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>, Ramesh.Sangha@parl.gc.ca,
Marwan.Tabbara@parl.gc.ca, Yasmin.Ratansi@parl.gc.ca,
Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
chad@williamson.law, steve.phillips@gov.ab.ca,
Karen.Thorsrud@gov.ab.ca, ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca,
Kaycee.Madu@gov.ab.ca, edmontonprosecutions@gov.ab.ca,
dnaylor@westernstandardonline.com, howard.anglin@gmail.com,
centralpeace.notley@assembly.ab.ca,
cypress.medicinehat@assembly.ab.ca, airdrie.east@assembly.ab.ca,
lacombe.ponoka@assembly.ab.ca, brooks.medicinehat@assembly.ab.ca,
bonnyville.coldlake.stpaul@assembly.ab.ca,
theangryalbertan@protonmail.com, david.dickson@dksdata.com,
lboothby@postmedia.com, acps.calgaryprosecutions@gov.ab.ca, premier
<premier@gov.ab.ca>, sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>,
keean.bexte@rebelnews.com, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, sfine
<sfine@globeandmail.com>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
news-tips <news-tips@nytimes.com>, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
ombudsman-communications@forces.gc.ca
 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcnfozXBxCI&ab_channel=RebelNews


SPYING ON CITIZENS: Trudeau & U.S. Navy pay defence contractors to spy
on Rebel News
20,721 views
•Premiered 4 hours ago
2.8K
Rebel News
1.45M subscribers
http://www.StopSpyingOnUs.com
The U.S. Navy teamed up with defence contractors at the University of
Arkansas and the Canadian Special Operations Forces Command under
Prime Minister Trudeau's defence minister Harjit Sajjan, commissioning
a report to spy on Rebel News. Ezra Levant explains their operation.

Rebel News: Telling the other side of the story.
https://www.rebelnews.com​ for more great Rebel content.


---------- Original message ----------
From: Howard Anglin <howard.anglin@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 22:14:57 -0600
Subject: Re: Methinks this email will put Howie Anglin's fancy blue
knickers in quite knot AGAIN N'esy Pas Higgy?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Please unsubscribe me from your weird mailing list.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Howard Anglin <howard.anglin@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 18:46:51 -0600
Subject: Re: See Attachment Methinks "the Honourable" Kaycee Madu
should find all the documents and CD I sent to his office byway of
registered US mail in 2005 when Rotten Ralphy was the Premier N'esy
Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Please unsubscribe me from your conspiracy newsletter.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Chad Williamson <chad@williamson.law>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 17:32:19 -0700
Subject: DELAYED RESPONSE TIMES Re: See Attachment Methinks "the
Honourable" Kaycee Madu should find all the documents and CD I sent to
his office byway of registered US mail in 2005 when Rotten Ralphy was
the Premier N'esy Pas?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Thank you kindly for your email. Please be advised, due to a sizable
backlog of communications sent to our office, we are now experiencing
a delay in our response times to emails. We are working to resolve the
backlog and will respond to emails in a priority sequence until the
backlog is cleared.

We apologize for any inconvenience and will get back to you as soon as we can.

If you require immediate assistance, please contact my assistant Susan
Richardson at susan@williamson.law or by calling the main office at
587-355-3321 and leaving a voicemail.

--



*Chad Williamson*
*Barrister & Solicitor*
*Phone & Fax:* 587-355-3321
*Toll Free:* 1-888-308-2726
chad@williamson.law
638 11 Avenue SW, Suite 200 | Calgary, Alberta | T2R 0E2

http://www.williamson.law/

This communication and any attachments are intended solely for the use of
the addressee(s) shown herein. The information contained in this email may
be confidential, personal, privileged and exempt from disclosure under
applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
writer immediately. Any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this
information by a person other than the intended recipient is strictly
prohibited. All communications received in error must be deleted or
destroyed.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 21:32:07 -0300
Subject: See Attachment Methinks "the Honourable" Kaycee Madu should
find all the documents and CD I sent to his office byway of registered
US mail in 2005 when Rotten Ralphy was the Premier N'esy Pas?
To: chad@williamson.law, steve.phillips@gov.ab.ca,
Karen.Thorsrud@gov.ab.ca, ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca,
Kaycee.Madu@gov.ab.ca, edmontonprosecutions@gov.ab.ca,
dnaylor@westernstandardonline.com, howard.anglin@gmail.com,
centralpeace.notley@assembly.ab.ca,
cypress.medicinehat@assembly.ab.ca, airdrie.east@assembly.ab.ca,
lacombe.ponoka@assembly.ab.ca, brooks.medicinehat@assembly.ab.ca,
bonnyville.coldlake.stpaul@assembly.ab.ca,
theangryalbertan@protonmail.com, david.dickson@dksdata.com,
lboothby@postmedia.com, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
acps.calgaryprosecutions@gov.ab.ca, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, sheilagunnreid
<sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, keean.bexte@rebelnews.com, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, sfine <sfine@globeandmail.com>

On 3/11/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: JONATHAN.VANCE@forces.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:01:09 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON
> STALKER, all the NATO dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>
> Admiral Art McDonald is now the Chief of the Defence Staff, he may be
> reached at art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca. I will continue to monitor this
> account periodically until my retirement from the Canadian Armed
> Forces. Please reach out to EA CDS, LCol Richard Jolette at
> richard.jolette@forces.gc.ca if you require to get a hold of me.
>
> L'amiral Art McDonald est maintenant le Chef d'état-major de la
> Défense, on peut le joindre au art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca. Je
> continuerai de surveiller ce compte périodiquement jusqu'à ma retraite
> des Forces armées canadiennes. Veuillez contacter CdeC CEMD, Lcol
> Richard Jolette au richard.jolette@forces.gc.ca si vous avez besoin de
> me contacter.
>
> On 3/11/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:35:27 -0400
>> Subject: Re: YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON STALKER, all the
>> NATO dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam
>> To: Michel.Drapeau@mdlo.ca, "Gilles.Moreau" <Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>
>> Cc: mlo-blm@forces.gc.ca, "erin.otoole" <erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca>,
>> "Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "jagmeet.singh"
>> <jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
>> "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
>>
>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/fifth-estate-military-justice-1.5943931
>>
>>
>> Prosecuting high-ranking officers a 'significant challenge'
>>
>> "Retired colonel and lawyer Michel Drapeau, who is a leading expert in
>> military justice, said he wonders how a court martial could hear a
>> case involving Vance or McDonald when no one in the military,
>> including judges, would outrank them."
>>
>> PERHAPS I SHOULD SUE THEM EH???
>>
>> On 9/23/19, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Byrne Furlong
>>> Press Secretary
>>> Office of the Minister of National Defence
>>> 613-996-3100
>>>
>>> Media Relations
>>> Department of National Defence
>>> 613-996-2353
>>> mlo-blm@forces.gc.ca
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:14:23 -0300
>>> Subject: Fwd: YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON STALKER, all the
>>> NATO dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam
>>> To: Michel.Drapeau@mdlo.ca, Walter.Semianiw@mdlo.ca, Newsroom
>>> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>
>>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Peter Stoffer
>>> STRATEGIC ADVISOR
>>>
>>> (613) 236-2657 x200
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Mr. Stoffer served as a Member of Parliament for the riding of
>>> Sackville-Eastern Shore from 1997 to 2015. During 2011-2015, he served
>>> as the Official Opposition Critic for Veterans Affairs.
>>>
>>> During this time, Mr. Stoffer was honoured with a variety of awards
>>> from the environmental, military, provincial and federal communities.
>>> He was named Canada’s Parliamentarian of the year 2013, and he
>>> received the Veterans Ombudsman award. Mr Stoffer has been knighted
>>> into the Order of St. George and has also been knighted by the King of
>>> the Netherlands into the Order of Orange Nassau.
>>>
>>> He is currently volunteering for a variety of veteran organizations.
>>> He is also host to a radio show called “Hour of Heroes in Nova Scotia”
>>> on Community Radio,  Radio Station 97-5 CIOE-FM, the Voice of the East
>>> Coast Music.
>>>
>>>
>>> Colonel-Maître® Michel William Drapeau
>>> SENIOR COUNSEL
>>> (613) 236-2657 x200
>>> Michel.Drapeau@mdlo.ca
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 13:43:40 -0300
>>> Subject: YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON STALKER, all the NATO
>>> dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam
>>> To: JONATHAN.VANCE@forces.gc.ca, "Gilles.Moreau"
>>> <Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, stalker.mason@hq.nato.int
>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>, mcu
>>> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, ombudsman-communications@forces.gc.ca,
>>> "Paul.Shuttle" <Paul.Shuttle@pco-bcp.gc.ca>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: MASON.STALKER@forces.gc.ca
>>> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:38:01 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: [SUSPECTED SPAM / SPAM SUSPECT] A little
>>> Deja Vu for JONATHAN.VANCE et al
>>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Good day,
>>>
>>> Please note that I do not have regular access to DWAN and your email
>>> has not been forwarded.
>>>
>>> Please forward your email to: stalker.mason@hq.nato.int
>>>
>>> Thank you in advance,
>>>
>>> MJS
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/23/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: MASON.STALKER@forces.gc.ca
>>>> Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 12:04:41 +0000
>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks its obvious why the Crown would
>>>> drop the charges after Mark Norman's lawyers hit Trudeau and his buddy
>>>> Butts with subpoenas N'esy Pas/
>>>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Good day,
>>>>
>>>> Please note that I do not have regular access to DWAN and your email
>>>> has not been forwarded.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: JONATHAN.VANCE@forces.gc.ca
>>>> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:26:35 +0000
>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: I see that the the evil blogger in Alberta
>>>> Barry Winters aka Mr Baconfat is still practising libel and hate
>>>> speech      contrary to Sections 300 and 319 0f the Canadian Criminal Code
>>>> N'esy Pas Mr Prime Minister Trudeau "The Younger" ???
>>>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> I will be out of the office until 23 February 2016. I am unable to
>>>> monitor my e-mail during this time. For urgent matters, please contact
>>>> my Chief of Staff, BGen Tammy Harris (Tammy.Harris@forces.gc.ca), or
>>>> my EA, Maj Cedric Aspirault (Cedric.Aspirault@forces.gc.ca) both of
>>>> whom can contact me.
>>>>
>>>> Je serai hors du bureau jusqu'au 23 février 2016. Il ne me sera pas
>>>> possible de vérifier mes couriels pendant cette période. En cas
>>>> d'urgence, veuillez contacter ma chef d'état major, Bgén Tammy Harris
>>>> (Tammy.Harris@forces.gc.ca), ou mon CdC, le maj Cédric Aspirault
>>>> (Cedric.Aspirault@forces.gc.ca), ils seront en mesure de me rejoindre.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: "Chisholm, Jill" <Jill.Chisholm@justice.gc.ca>
>>>> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:26:34 +0000
>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: I see that the the evil blogger in Alberta
>>>> Barry Winters aka Mr Baconfat is still practising libel and hate
>>>> speech contrary to Sections 300 and 319 0f the Canadian Criminal Code
>>>> N'esy Pas Mr Prime Minister Trudeau "The Younger" ???
>>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your message. I will be away from the office until
>>>> Friday, February 26, 2016 and will not be accessing email frequently
>>>> during this time.  Should you require assistance please contact
>>>> Jacqueline Fenton at (902) 426-6996.  Otherwise I will be pleased to
>>>> respond to your message upon my return.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada
>>>> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
>>>> Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 16:46:28 +0000
>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: YOr Ralph Goodale Methinks this should
>>>> stress the Integrity of the Globe and Mail and your minions in the
>>>> RCMP N'esy Pas?
>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
>>>> Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
>>>> Please be assured that your email has been received and will be read
>>>> with
>>>> care.
>>>> However, in light of the federal elections being held on October 21,
>>>> there may be a delay in processing your email.
>>>>
>>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>>>
>>>> Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
>>>> Justice et procureur général du Canada.
>>>> Soyez assuré que votre courriel a bien été reçu et que celui-ci sera
>>>> lu avec soin.
>>>> Cependant, compte tenu des élections fédérales du 21 octobre prochain,
>>>> veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le
>>>> traitement de votre courriel.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Oreiginal message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 13:02:10 -0300
>>>> Subject: A little Deja Vu for Ralph Goodale and the RCMP before I file
>>>> my next lawsuit as promised
>>>> To: Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca,
>>>> Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
>>>> Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.cabarbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>>> elder.marques@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
>>>> Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca, "clare.barry"
>>>> clare.barry@justice.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
>>>> alaina@alainalockhart.ca, info@ginettepetitpastaylor.ca,
>>>> oldmaison@yahoo.com, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca, daniel.mchardie@cbc.ca,
>>>> info@waynelong.ca, matt@mattdecourcey.ca, info@sergecormier.ca,
>>>> pat@patfinnigan.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, tj@tjharvey.ca,
>>>> karen.ludwig.nb@gmail.com, votejohnw@gmail.com,
>>>> PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com, Frank.McKenna@td.com, postur@for.is,
>>>> postur@fjr.stjr.is, Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca,
>>>> Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>>> David.Akin@globalnews.ca, dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>>> Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Dave.Young@nbeub.cajfurey@nbpower.com,
>>>> jfetzer@d.umn.edu, postur@irr.is, birgittajoy@gmail.com,
>>>> birgitta@this.is>, Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca, Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca,
>>>> blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, kris.austin@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca,
>>>> carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>>> Michel.Carrier@gnb.ca, Yves.Cote@elections.ca, Greg.Bonnar@gnb.ca
>>>> Cc: motomaniac333@gmail.com, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
>>>> fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca, hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: "Telford, Katie" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
>>>> Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 13:14:20 +0000
>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: YO Mr Butts Here are some more comments
>>>> published within CBC that the RCMP and their boss Ralph Goodale should
>>>> review ASAP N'esy Pas?
>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>> I am out of the office until Tuesday, October 22nd without access to
>>>> this
>>>> email.
>>>> In my absence, you may contact Mike McNair
>>>> (michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca<mailto:michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>) or
>>>> Elder Marques
>>>> (elder.marques@pmo-cpm.gc.ca<mailto:elder.marques@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>).
>>>> Warm regards,
>>>> Katie
>>>> ______
>>>> Bonjour,
>>>> Je suis absente du bureau jusqu'au mardi 22 octobre sans accès à mes
>>>> courriels.
>>>> Durant mon absence, veuillez communiquer avec Mike McNair
>>>> (michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca<mailto:michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>) ou
>>>> Elder Marques
>>>> (elder.marques@pmo-cpm.gc.ca<mailto:elder.marques@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>).
>>>> Cordialement,
>>>> Katie
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: "Butts, Gerald" <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
>>>> Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 06:33:26 +0000
>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: So Much for the Strong Ethics of the Strong
>>>> Organization commonnly knows as the RCMP/GRC N'esy Pas?
>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your email. I am out of the office with limited access
>>>> to email. For assistance, please email Laura D'Angelo at
>>>> laura.d'angelo@pmo-cpm.gc.ca.
>>>>
>>>> Merci pour votre message. Je suis absent du bureau avec un accèss
>>>> limité aux courriels. Si vous avez besoin d'assistance, veuillez
>>>> communiquer avec Laura D'Angelo à l'adresse
>>>> laura.d'angelo@pmo-cpm.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca
>>>> Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 06:30:48 +0000
>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: So Much for the Strong Ethics of the Strong
>>>> Organization commonnly knows as the RCMP/GRC N'esy Pas?
>>>> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
>>>> of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
>>>>
>>>> This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
>>>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
>>>> may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
>>>> message will be carefully reviewed.
>>>>
>>>> To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
>>>> the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
>>>>
>>>> Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
>>>> Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the
>>>> Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future
>>>> correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write
>>>> directly to the Department of Justice at
>>>> mcu@justice.gc.ca<mailto:mcu@justice.gc.ca> or call 613-957-4222.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you
>>>>
>>>> -------------------
>>>>
>>>> Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
>>>> Vancouver Granville.
>>>>
>>>> Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
>>>> courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
>>>> correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
>>>> votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
>>>>
>>>> Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
>>>> veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
>>>> votre adresse et votre code postal.
>>>>
>>>> Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
>>>> la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
>>>> d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
>>>> Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
>>>> Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
>>>> mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.
>>>>
>>>> Merci
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>> From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale  (PS/SP)" <Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
>>>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:53:15 +0000
>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Emails to Department of Justice and
>>>> Province of Nova Scotia
>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la
>>>> S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile.
>>>> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
>>>> adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un
>>>> retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre
>>>> message sera examin? avec attention.
>>>> Merci!
>>>> L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle
>>>> S?curit? publique Canada
>>>> *********
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of
>>>> Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
>>>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
>>>> addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in
>>>> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
>>>> carefully reviewed.
>>>> Thank you!
>>>> Ministerial Correspondence Unit
>>>> Public Safety Canada
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>> From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca
>>>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:53:11 +0000
>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Emails to Department of Justice and
>>>> Province of Nova Scotia
>>>> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
>>>> of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
>>>>
>>>> This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
>>>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
>>>> may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
>>>> message will be carefully reviewed.
>>>>
>>>> To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
>>>> the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
>>>>
>>>> Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
>>>> Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the
>>>> Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future
>>>> correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write
>>>> directly to the Department of Justice at
>>>> mcu@justice.gc.ca<mailto:mcu@justice.gc.ca> or call 613-957-4222.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you
>>>>
>>>> -------------------
>>>>
>>>> Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
>>>> Vancouver Granville.
>>>>
>>>> Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
>>>> courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
>>>> correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
>>>> votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
>>>>
>>>> Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
>>>> veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
>>>> votre adresse et votre code postal.
>>>>
>>>> Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
>>>> la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
>>>> d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
>>>> Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
>>>> Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
>>>> mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.
>>>>
>>>> Merci
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
>>>> <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
>>>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:53:17 +0000
>>>> Subject: RE: Re Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova
>>>> Scotia
>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
>>>> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
>>>> comments.
>>>>
>>>> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
>>>> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
>>>> commentaires.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
>>>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:53:16 +0000
>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Emails to Department of Justice and
>>>> Province of Nova Scotia
>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>>>>
>>>> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
>>>> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
>>>> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com
>>>>
>>>> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
>>>> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>>>>
>>>> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
>>>> press releases.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 12:53:03 -0400
>>>> Subject: Re Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>>>> To: wrscott@nbpower.com, "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
>>>> "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"
>>>> <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, krisaustin <krisaustin@peoplesalliance.ca>,
>>>> "rick.doucet" <rick.doucet@gnb.ca>, "Sollows, David (ERD/DER)"
>>>> <david.sollows@gnb.ca>, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
>>>> "robert.gauvin" <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca,
>>>> "Bill.Fraser" <Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca>, "John.Ames" <John.Ames@gnb.ca>,
>>>> gerry.lowe@gnb.ca, "hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>,
>>>> michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, "art.odonnell" <art.odonnell@nb.aibn.com>,
>>>> "jake.stewart" <jake.stewart@gnb.ca>, mike.holland@gnb.ca, votejohnw
>>>> <votejohnw@gmail.com>, andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca,
>>>> greg.thompson2@gnb.ca, jean-claude.d'amours@gnb.ca,
>>>> jacques.j.leblanc@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, keith.chiasson@gnb.ca,
>>>> "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, robert.mckee@gnb.ca,
>>>> rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy"
>>>> <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, gphlaw@nb.aibn.com, wharrison
>>>> <wharrison@nbpower.com>, "Furey, John" <jfurey@nbpower.com>,
>>>> "Jody.Wilson-Raybould" <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>,
>>>> "clare.barry" <clare.barry@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
>>>> "hon.ralph.goodale" <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>,
>>>> "Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc" <Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca>, "Bill.Morneau"
>>>> <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>,
>>>> JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca, LauraLee.Langley@novascotia.ca,
>>>> Karen.Hudson@novascotia.ca, Joanne.Munro@novascotia.ca, Newsroom
>>>> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, news
>>>> <news@dailygleaner.com>
>>>> Cc: "David.Raymond.Amos" <David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com>, motomaniac333
>>>> <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Victoria.Zinck@novascotia.ca,
>>>> Kim.Fleming@novascotia.ca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>> From: "McGrath, Stephen T" <Stephen.McGrath@novascotia.ca>
>>>> Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 12:40:22 +0000
>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Does anyone recall the email entitled "So
>>>> Stephen McGrath if not you then just exactly who sent me this latest
>>>> email from your office?"
>>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your message, however I am no longer at the Department of
>>>> Justice, and this email account is not being monitored.
>>>>
>>>> Please contact Kim Fleming at Kim.Fleming@novascotia.ca (phone
>>>> 902-424-4023), or Vicky Zinck at Victoria.Zinck@novascotia.ca (phone
>>>> 902-424-4390). Kim and Vicky will be able to redirect you.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>>>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>>>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Amos,
>>>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>>>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>>>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>>>> of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>>>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>>>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
>>>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>>>
>>>> Department of Justice
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 15:16:38 -0400
>>>> Subject: Attn Laura Lee Langley, Karen Hudson and Joanne Munro I just
>>>> called all three of your offices to inform you of my next lawsuit
>>>> against Nova Scotia
>>>> To: LauraLee.Langley@novascotia.ca, Karen.Hudson@novascotia.ca,
>>>> Joanne.Munro@novascotia.ca
>>>> Cc: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> https://novascotia.ca/exec_council/NSDeputies.html
>>>>
>>>> https://novascotia.ca/exec_council/LLLangley-bio.html
>>>>
>>>> Laura Lee Langley
>>>> 1700 Granville Street, 5th Floor
>>>> One Government Place
>>>> Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 1X5
>>>> Phone: (902) 424-8940
>>>> Fax: (902) 424-0667
>>>> Email: LauraLee.Langley@novascotia.ca
>>>>
>>>> https://novascotia.ca/just/deputy.asp
>>>>
>>>> Karen Hudson Q.C.
>>>> 1690 Hollis Street, 7th Floor
>>>> Joseph Howe Building
>>>> Halifax, NS B3J 3J9
>>>> Phone: (902) 424-4223
>>>> Fax: (902) 424-0510
>>>> Email: Karen.Hudson@novascotia.ca
>>>>
>>>> https://novascotia.ca/sns/ceo.asp
>>>>
>>>> Joanne Munro:
>>>> 1505 Barrington Street, 14-South
>>>> Maritime Centre
>>>> Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3K5
>>>> Phone: (902) 424-4089
>>>> Fax: (902) 424-5510
>>>> Email: Joanne.Munro@novascotia.ca
>>>>
>>>> If you don't wish to speak to me before I begin litigation then I
>>>> suspect the Integrity Commissioner New Brunswick or the Federal Crown
>>>> Counsel can explain the email below and the documents hereto attached
>>>> to you and your Premier etc.
>>>>
>>>> Veritas Vincit
>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>> 902 800 0369
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Good Day Sir
>>>>
>>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>>
>>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>>
>>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>>
>>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>>
>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>>>>
>>>> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>>>>
>>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>>>>
>>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>>>>
>>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>>
>>>> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>>
>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>>
>>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>>
>>>> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>>
>>>> Date: 20151223
>>>>
>>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>>
>>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>>
>>>> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>>
>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>>
>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>>
>>>> Plaintiff
>>>>
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>>
>>>> Defendant
>>>>
>>>> ORDER
>>>>
>>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>>
>>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>>> in its entirety.
>>>>
>>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
>>>> he stated:
>>>>
>>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>>
>>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>>> Police.
>>>>
>>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
>>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>>
>>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>>> Judge
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>>
>>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
>>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
>>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>>
>>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>>> most
>>>>
>>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>>>>
>>>> 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>>
>>>> January 13, 2015
>>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>>
>>>> December 8, 2014
>>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>>
>>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Vertias Vincit
>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>> 902 800 0369
>>>>
>>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>>
>>>> Subject:
>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>>
>>>> January 30, 2007
>>>>
>>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>>
>>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>>
>>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>>
>>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>>> Minister of Health
>>>>
>>>> CM/cb
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
>>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>>
>>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>>
>>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>>
>>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>>>
>>>> http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>> United States Senate
>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>
>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>>> raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that
>>>> these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in
>>>> contact
>>>> with you about this previously.
>>>>
>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>> Hon. Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.
>>>> Integrity Commissioner
>>>>
>>>> Hon. Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., who resides in Bathurst, N.B., is a
>>>> native of Kedgwick, N.B., and is married to Huguette (Savoie)
>>>> Deschênes. They have two sons.
>>>>
>>>> He studied at Saint-Joseph University (now Université de Moncton) from
>>>> 1960 to 1962, University of Ottawa from 1962-1965 (B.A.), and
>>>> University of New Brunswick (LL.B., 1968). He was admitted to the Law
>>>> Society of New Brunswick in 1968. He was legal counsel to the
>>>> Department of Justice in Fredericton from 1968 to 1971. He was in
>>>> private practice from 1972 to 1982 and specialized in civil litigation
>>>> as a partner in the law firm of Michaud, Leblanc, Robichaud, and
>>>> Deschênes. While residing in Shediac, N.B., he served on town council
>>>> and became the first president of the South East Economic Commission.
>>>> He is a past president of the Richelieu Club in Shediac.
>>>>
>>>> In 1982, he was appointed a judge of the Court of Queen’s Bench of New
>>>> Brunswick and of the Court of Appeal of New Brunswick in 2000.
>>>>
>>>> On July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the Court Martial Appeal Court of
>>>> Canada.
>>>>
>>>> While on the Court of Appeal of New Brunswick, he was appointed
>>>> President of the provincial Judicial Council and in 2012 Chairperson
>>>> of the Federal Electoral Boundaries Commission for the Province of New
>>>> Brunswick for the 2015 federal election.
>>>>
>>>> He was appointed Conflict of Interest Commissioner in December 2016
>>>> and became New Brunswick’s first Integrity Commissioner on December
>>>> 16, 2016 with responsibilities for conflict of interest issues related
>>>> to Members of the Legislative Assembly. As of April 1, 2017 he
>>>> supervises lobbyists of public office holders under the Lobbyists’
>>>> Registration Act.
>>>>
>>>> As of September 1, 2017, he will be assuming the functions presently
>>>> held by the Access to Information and Privacy Commissioner.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>> From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
>>>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:05:47 +0000
>>>> Subject: Re: Hey Premier Gallant please inform the questionable
>>>> parliamentarian Birigtta Jonsdottir that although NB is a small "Have
>>>> Not" province at least we have twice the population of Iceland and
>>>> that not all of us are as dumb as she and her Prime Minister pretends
>>>> to be..
>>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið  / Your request has been received
>>>>
>>>> Kveðja / Best regards
>>>> Forsætisráðuneytið  / Prime Minister's Office
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>> From: Póstur IRR <postur@irr.is>
>>>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:05:47 +0000
>>>> Subject: Re: Hey Premier Gallant please inform the questionable
>>>> parliamentarian Birigtta Jonsdottir that although NB is a small "Have
>>>> Not" province at least we have twice the population of Iceland and
>>>> that not all of us are as dumb as she and her Prime Minister pretends
>>>> to be..
>>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received.
>>>>
>>>> Kveðja / Best regards
>>>> Innanríkisráðuneytið / Ministry of the Interior
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)" <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
>>>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 21:39:17 +0000
>>>> Subject: RE: After crossing paths with them bigtime in 2004 Davey Baby
>>>> Coon and his many Green Meanie and Fake Left cohorts know why I won't
>>>> hold my breath waiting for them to act with any semblance of integrity
>>>> now N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc??
>>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick.
>>>> Please be assured that your email has been received, will be reviewed,
>>>> and a response will be forthcoming.
>>>> Once again, thank you for taking the time to write.
>>>>
>>>> Merci d'avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du Nouveau-Brunswick.
>>>> Soyez assuré que votre courriel a bien été reçu, qu'il sera examiné
>>>> et qu'une réponse vous sera acheminée.
>>>> Merci encore d'avoir pris de temps de nous écrire.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely, / Sincèrement,
>>>> Mallory Fowler
>>>> Corespondence Manager / Gestionnaire de la correspondance
>>>> Office of the Premier / Cabinet du premier ministre
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
>>>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 21:43:50 +0000
>>>> Subject: Re: After crossing paths with them bigtime in 2004 Davey Baby
>>>> Coon and his many Green Meanie and Fake Left cohorts know why I won't
>>>> hold my breath waiting for them to act with any semblance of integrity
>>>> now N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc??
>>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið  / Your request has been received
>>>>
>>>> Kveðja / Best regards
>>>> Forsætisráðuneytið  / Prime Minister's Office
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Póstur IRR <postur@irr.is>
>>>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 21:43:50 +0000
>>>> Subject: Re: After crossing paths with them bigtime in 2004 Davey Baby
>>>> Coon and his many Green Meanie and Fake Left cohorts know why I won't
>>>> hold my breath waiting for them to act with any semblance of integrity
>>>> now N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc??
>>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received.
>>>>
>>>> Kveðja / Best regards
>>>> Innanríkisráðuneytið / Ministry of the Interior
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For the public record I knew Birgitta was no better than the people
>>>> she bitches about when she refused to discuss the QSLS blog with me
>>>> while she was in Canada making her rounds in the Canadain media in
>>>> January of 2011.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is the docket
>>>>
>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>>>>
>>>> These are digital recordings of  the last two hearings
>>>>
>>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>>>>
>>>> Jan 11th https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>>>>
>>>> This me running for a seat in Parliament again while CBC denies it
>>>> again
>>>>
>>>> Fundy Royal, New Brunswick Debate – Federal Elections 2015 - The Local
>>>> Campaign, Rogers TV
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cFOKT6TlSE
>>>>
>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276
>>>>
>>>> Veritas Vincit
>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>> 902 800 0369
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:20:29 -0400
>>>> Subject: Hey before you Red Coats swear an Oath to the Queen and the
>>>> 42nd Parliament begins perhaps the turncoat Big Bad Billy Casey the
>>>> Yankee carpetbagger David Lutz or some Boyz from NB should explain
>>>> this lawsuit to you real slow.
>>>> To: alaina@alainalockhart.ca, david <david@lutz.nb.ca>,
>>>> "daniel.mchardie" <daniel.mchardie@cbc.ca>, info@waynelong.ca,
>>>> info@ginettepetitpastaylor.ca, rarseno@nbnet.nb.ca,
>>>> matt@mattdecourcey.ca, info@sergecormier.ca, pat@patfinnigan.ca,
>>>> tj@tjharvey.ca, karen.ludwig.nb@gmail.com
>>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "Frank.McKenna"
>>>> <Frank.McKenna@td.com>, info@votezsteve.ca, info@billcasey.ca,
>>>> "justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>,
>>>> "dominic.leblanc.a1" <dominic.leblanc.a1@parl.gc.ca>, oldmaison
>>>> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, jacques_poitras <jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>,
>>>> "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "peter.mackay"
>>>> <peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>>> most
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>>>>
>>>> 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>>
>>>> January 13, 2015
>>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>>
>>>> December 8, 2014
>>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>>
>>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>>
>>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>>
>>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>>
>>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>>
>>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>>
>>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>>
>>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>>> essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An
>>>> ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear
>>>> and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,”
>>>> or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of
>>>> terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states
>>>> “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of
>>>> Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an
>>>> ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the
>>>> Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
>>>>
>>>> One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty
>>>> was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the
>>>> amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time
>>>> denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time
>>>> self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of
>>>> “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the
>>>> G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious
>>>> behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister
>>>> Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully
>>>> cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits
>>>> are not.
>>>>
>>>> Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal
>>>> mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the
>>>> world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy”
>>>> David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security
>>>> and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can
>>>> and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing
>>>> “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war
>>>> criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending
>>>> tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
>>>>
>>>> In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
>>>> “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
>>>> successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing,
>>>> marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian
>>>> military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern
>>>> equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are
>>>> antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five
>>>> years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that
>>>> won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
>>>>
>>>> My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
>>>> Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin
>>>> Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not
>>>> served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social
>>>> democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and
>>>> other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet
>>>> these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to
>>>> other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
>>>>
>>>> Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security,
>>>> and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before
>>>> shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
>>>>
>>>> Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now
>>>>
>>>> From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
>>>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
>>>> Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and
>>>> the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still
>>>> alive
>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
>>>> your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply
>>>> to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
>>>> Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the
>>>> War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
>>>> To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil,
>>>> Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, john.adams@cse-cst.gc.ca,
>>>> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, stoffp1 <stoffp1@parl.gc.ca>,
>>>> dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca,
>>>> milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca,
>>>> sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari
>>>> <smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
>>>> susan@blueskystrategygroup.com, Don@blueskystrategygroup.com,
>>>> eugene@blueskystrategygroup.com, americas@aljazeera.net
>>>> Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice" <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin"
>>>> <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower
>>>> <whistleblower@ctv.ca>
>>>>
>>>> I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David
>>>> Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's
>>>> Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on
>>>> CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To
>>>> be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested
>>>> that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise
>>>> if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else
>>>> about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact  that  your
>>>> old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English
>>>> never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is
>>>> interesting though
>>>>
>>>> http://www.blueskystrategygroup.com/index.php/team/don-newman/
>>>>
>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/media/story/2010/05/04/al-jazeera-english-launch.html
>>>>
>>>> Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
>>>> this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
>>>> Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad
>>>> Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
>>>>
>>>> The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a
>>>> shy political animal
>>>>
>>>> Veritas Vincit
>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>> 902 800 0369
>>>>
>>>> Enjoy Mr Weston
>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/news/story/2011/05/15/weston-iraq-invasion-wikileaks.html
>>>>
>>>> "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
>>>> brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
>>>> says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
>>>> to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
>>>> including a Canadian general.
>>>>
>>>> That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
>>>> who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
>>>> U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was
>>>> also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
>>>> prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
>>>>
>>>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2010/06/canada-and-united-states.html
>>>>
>>>> "I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
>>>> being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
>>>> demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
>>>> "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
>>>> into the US policy.
>>>>
>>>> At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
>>>> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
>>>> in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
>>>> report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was
>>>> never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
>>>> were deployed WMD.
>>>>
>>>> Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
>>>> invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
>>>> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
>>>> (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
>>>> about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
>>>> that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
>>>> authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
>>>>
>>>> There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
>>>> its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
>>>> to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
>>>> folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
>>>> upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions
>>>> are to met before US troop can redeploy?  Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>>> and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of
>>>> Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them
>>>> correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the
>>>> George W Bush administration was onerous
>>>>
>>>> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
>>>> military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
>>>> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
>>>> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
>>>> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
>>>> operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
>>>> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
>>>> ....not necessarily in that order. "
>>>>
>>>> You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
>>>> Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.socom.mil/SOCOMHome/Pages/ContactUSSOCOM.aspx
>>>>
>>>
>>
>



Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics


NUMBER 123 
l
1st SESSION 
l
42nd PARLIAMENT 

EVIDENCE

Tuesday, October 30, 2018

Mr. Michael Fenrick (Constitutional and Legal Adviser, National Board of Directors, Liberal Party of Canada):  

"For our part, many of the same things that Mr. Bailey has spoken to apply equally with respect to the Liberal Party and its treatment of personal information. From the perspective of somebody outside the system gaining access, we regularly run training. We've developed a cybersecurity policy, and we regularly run training at all levels of the organization, in terms of trying to ensure that people are educated about how to avoid things like phishing scams, spoof email addresses and matters along those lines.
    In addition to that, the Liberal Party's national director and the team at the head office here in Ottawa have met with the CSE in order to discuss best practices on how to secure Canadians' information. That includes using cloud-based email servers, which is what is recommended by the CSE. That has been implemented."

 

----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "McKnight, Gisele" McKnight.Gisele@kingscorecord.com
> > > > To: lcampenella@ledger.com
> > > > Cc:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:53 PM
> > > > Subject: David Amos
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Hello Lisa,
> > > > > David Amos asked me to contact you. I met him last June after he
> > became
> > > an
> > > > > independent (not representing any political party) candidate in our
> > > > federal
> > > > > election that was held June 28.
> > > > >
> > > > > He was a candidate in our constituency of Fundy (now called
> > > Fundy-Royal).
> > > > I
> > > > > wrote a profile story about him, as I did all other candidates. That
> > > story
> > > > > appeared in the Kings County Record June 22. A second story, written
> > by
> > > > one
> > > > > of my reporters, appeared on the same date, which was a report on
> the
> > > > > candidates' debate held June 18.
> > > > >
> > > > > As I recall David Amos came last of four candidates in the election.
> > The
> > > > > winner got 14,997 votes, while Amos got 358.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have attached the two stories that appeared, as well as a photo
> > taken
> > > by
> > > > > reporter Erin Hatfield during the debate. I couldn't find the photo
> > that
> > > > > ran, but this one is very similar.
> > > > >
> > > > > Gisele McKnight
> > > > > editor A1-debate A1-amos,David for MP 24.doc debate
2.JPG
> > > > > Kings County Record
> > > > > Sussex, New Brunswick
> > > > > Canada
> > > > > 506-433-1070
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd

By Erin Hatfield

"If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
world is all screwed up, rearrange it."

The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
unofficial, theme song for the debate.

The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.

The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was
organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage
of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record
and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.

Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
other on their answers and criticizing eachothers’ party leaders.
Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic
relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's
getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."

Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his
party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but
well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am
on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better
places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters
shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.

The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At
one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in
front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the
voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According to
Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and second
readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted, at
final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to
register sex offenders rather than register the property of law
abiding citizens."

The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and
women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman
yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron
spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.

Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy
Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You’re out of touch," Armstrong
yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of
post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged
Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time,
anyplace," Armstrong responded.

As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate,
candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and
fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making
process for the June 28 vote.

Cutline – David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his
favourite possessions—motorcycles.

McKnight/KCR

The Unconventional Candidate

David Amos Isn’t Campaigning For Your Vote, But….

By Gisele McKnight

FUNDY—He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."

Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot—David Amos.

The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife
and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from
running for office in Canada.

One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail
to meet Elections Canada requirements.

When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his
favourite place to do so—Fundy.

Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his
dissatisfaction with politicians.

"I’ve become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he
said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."

The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in
1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he
needed to change his life.

"I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that
sometimes in midlife."

So Amos, who’d lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners
motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952
Panhead motorcycle.

"Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact)
experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you
renew your faith in mankind – you help anyone you can, you never ask
for anything, but you take what they offer."

For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs
and conversation all over North America.

Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son
and a daughter and become a house-husband – Mr. Mom, as he calls
himself.

He also describes himself in far more colourful terms—a motorcyclist
rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed
individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud
Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."

Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his life.

"But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said.
"It’s alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"

Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.

"I didn’t appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door
interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can
call me. I’m not going to drive my opinions down their throats."

And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.

"I won’t take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It’s
not about money. It goes against what I’m fighting about."

What he’s fighting for is the discussion of issues – tainted blood,
the exploitation of the Maritimes’ gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
name a few.

"The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs – fishing,
farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I’m
death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
(NAFTA) out the window.

NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.

Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.

"There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
Don’t necessarily vote for me, but vote."

Although…if you’re going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have
your X by his name.

"I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and
say, ‘what the hell.’"



---------- Orignal message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 10:49:00 -0300
Subject: Methinks the evil lawyer Howie Cooper made a deal with the
VERY NASTY FBI dudes in Beantown N'esy Pas Howie Anglin?
To: hcooper@toddweld.com, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, stateofcorruptionnh1
<stateofcorruptionnh1@gmail.com>, "Boston.Mail"
<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, mdcohen212 <mdcohen212@gmail.com>,
art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca, richard.jolette@forces.gc.ca,
JONATHAN.VANCE@forces.gc.ca, Tammy.Harris@forces.gc.ca,
Jill.Chisholm@justice.gc.ca, Cedric.Aspirault@forces.gc.ca,
Derek.Sloan@parl.gc.ca, Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca,
Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
clare.barry@justice.gc.ca, michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
David.Akin@globalnews.ca, dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca,
hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca, Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca,
"andrea.anderson-mason" <andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>

,
Ramesh.Sangha@parl.gc.ca, Marwan.Tabbara@parl.gc.ca,
Yasmin.Ratansi@parl.gc.ca, Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, "Bill.Blair"
<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, chad@williamson.law,
steve.phillips@gov.ab.ca, Karen.Thorsrud@gov.ab.ca,
ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca, Kaycee.Madu@gov.ab.ca,
edmontonprosecutions@gov.ab.ca, dnaylor@westernstandardonline.com,
howard.anglin@gmail.com, centralpeace.notley@assembly.ab.ca,
cypress.medicinehat@assembly.ab.ca, airdrie.east@assembly.ab.ca,
lacombe.ponoka@assembly.ab.ca, brooks.medicinehat@assembly.ab.ca,
bonnyville.coldlake.stpaul@assembly.ab.ca,
theangryalbertan@protonmail.com, david.dickson@dksdata.com,
lboothby@postmedia.com, acps.calgaryprosecutions@gov.ab.ca, premier
<premier@gov.ab.ca>, sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>,
keean.bexte@rebelnews.com, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, sfine
<sfine@globeandmail.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, news-tips
<news-tips@nytimes.com>, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
ombudsman-communications@forces.gc.ca, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>,
etiernan@wickedlocal.com, nesimpson@patriotledger.com,
jdifazio@patriotledger.com, Nathalie Sturgeon
<sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, "steve.murphy"
<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>

https://no-click.mil/?https://www.patriotledger.com/news/20180118/prosecutors-say-joyces-lawyer-lied-should-be-pulled-from-trial

Prosecutors say Joyce’s lawyer lied, should be pulled from trial

 By Neal Simpson
The Patriot Ledger
Posted Jan 18, 2018 at 12:59 PM

BOSTON - Federal prosecutors have accused an attorney for former state
Sen. Brian Joyce of lying to state ethics officials and are asking a
judge to have him pulled from Joyce’s defense team if the former
legislator’s corruption case goes to trial.

In a motion filed earlier this month, prosecutors said lawyer Howard
Cooper had made “several material and false representations” to the
state Ethics Commission on behalf of Joyce, a Milton Democrat who is
accused of using the influence of his office to collect a series of
bribes, kickbacks and gifts, including hundreds of pounds of free
coffee and a Jeep.

Prosecutors say Cooper helped Joyce cover up at least two of his
schemes and could provide important testimony at trial.

Cooper, a founding partner at Todd & Weld in Boston, was not
identified by name in the 113-count indictment against Joyce, but
prosecutors said in their motion filed earlier this month that he was
the unnamed attorney described in the indictment as sending misleading
emails and letters to the Ethics Commission on Joyce’s behalf. Cooper
did not respond to request for comment Wednesday.

In one of those letters, sent in October 2016, prosecutors say Cooper
falsely told the Ethics Commission that Joyce had directed his
retirement account to purchase common stock in an energy-insurance
holding company doing business in Massachusetts.

In fact, prosecutors say, the retirement account was a sham created to
evade IRS penalties and hide Joyce’s direct investment in the company,
which stood to benefit from alternative-energy legislation that Joyce
was championing on Beacon Hill.

Prosecutors say Cooper also sent two misleading emails to the Ethics
Commission about Joyce’s relationship with a Dunkin’ Donuts franchisee
who made payments to Joyce and sent him free coffee at the same time
that the senator was pushing legislation that would help the
franchisee’s business.

Prosecutors said Joyce received hundreds of pounds of free coffee from
the franchisee – giving much of it away to constituents or fellow
state senators – but later tried to claim he paid for the coffee
deliveries or had received them in exchange for legal services
provided by his law firm.

In 2015, prosecutors say Cooper emailed the Ethics Commission and told
them Joyce had purchased the coffee he gave out to fellow senators the
previous Christmas. In reality, prosecutors say Joyce only paid for
the coffee only after The Boston Globe reported on the Christmas gifts
a month later.

Then in 2016, prosecutors say Cooper told the commission in an email
that an earlier delivery of coffee in 2013 had been made in exchange
for Joyce’s legal work on related to a Dunkin’ Donuts franchise. But
prosecutors say Joyce only invented that arrangement in 2015, two
years after the coffee had already been delivered.

Joyce was released last month on $250,000 bond secured by property he
owns in Canton. He is due back in court Feb. 23.

Neal Simpson may be reached at nesimpson@ledger.com or follow him on
Twitter @NSimpson_Ledger.

https://no-click.mil/?https://www.patriotledger.com/news/20180129/accountant-charged-with-helping-ex-sen-brian-joyce-defraud-irs

Accountant charged with helping ex-Sen. Brian Joyce defraud IRS
Image: Former Massachusetts State Sen. Brian Joyce is surrounded by
reporters as he leaves the U.S. Federal Courthouse in Worcester, Mass
By Erin Tiernan
The Patriot Ledger
Posted Jan 29, 2018 at 2:50 PM

Federal prosecutors say John H. Nardozzi helped the former Milton
Democrat avoid paying almost $800,000 in taxes over a four-year
period.

WORCESTER — A longtime accountant for former state Sen. Brian Joyce
has been charged with helping the embattled Milton Democrat prepare
and file false income tax returns, federal officials said.

John. H. Nardozzi of Waltham is accused of aiding Joyce and his family
in defrauding the government out of almost $800,000 in taxes over a
four-year period, according to an indictment unsealed on Monday.

Joyce was charged in a separate federal indictment in December that
alleges he laundered more than $1 million in kickbacks and bribes
through his law practice and another private business.

Nardozzi will appear in federal court in Worcester on Monday
afternoon, charged with one count of conspiring to defraud the IRS and
eight counts of aiding and assisting in the filing of false tax
returns, the U.S. Attorney’s Office said.

Prosecutors allege Nardozzi conspired with Joyce to defraud the IRS by
deducting millions of dollars in personal expenses as legitimate
business expenses, inflating self-employment income for Joyce and his
wife by more than $2 million in order to maximize retirement plan
contributions, falsifying withdrawals from a retirement account and
falsifying dividends on Joyce’s personal tax returns.

In total, Nardozzi is accused of misclassifying $2,268,520 to reduce
Joyce’s tax burden, according to prosecutors. Joyce’s law firm should
have paid out $850,748 in taxes during that period, of which Joyce
paid just $56,766.

“For tax years 2011 through and including 2014, defendant Nardozzi and
Joyce knowingly and willfully caused [Brian Joyce’s law firm] to avoid
paying approximately $793,982 in federal corporate income taxes,” the
indictment states.

Joyce, who moved to Westport with his family last year following an
FBI-raid on his law office, faces more than 100 charges ranging from
racketeering and extortion to money laundering and could place Joyce
behind bars for up to 20 years.

Then-Acting U.S. Attorney William Weinreb hinted in December at a
press conference announcing Joyce’s indictment that more arrests were
likely as the investigation into Joyce’s alleged corruption continued.

“He used his office as a criminal enterprise to make deals with his
business cronies and in exchange he took bribes, kickbacks ... and
took steps to conceal his corrupt acts,” Weinreb said at the time

Nardozzi’s indictment indicates that prosecutors believe the certified
public accountant played a part in that cover up.

Joyce and his wife bought $471,250 in common stock from a Delaware
energy insurance broker in 2014, $395,125 of which they paid for
though a series of early withdrawals from their retirement accounts.
In the Joyce indictment, prosecutors said the retirement account was a
sham created to evade IRS penalties and hide Joyce’s direct investment
in the company, which stood to benefit from alternative-energy
legislation that Joyce pushing on Beacon Hill.

Prosecutors allege Nardozzi, an accountant of 37 years, falsely
reported it as a tax-exempt retirement account rollover with the
intent to help the Joyce’s avoid paying taxes to the IRS.

“By reporting the early withdrawal of funds from the Joyce’s
retirement accounts as a tax-exempt rollover on Joyce’s 2014 personal
tax return... defendant Nardozzi and Joyce caused Joyce and Joyce’s
spouse to avoid paying approximately $208,100 in additional income
taxes and early withdrawal penalties,” the indictment states.

Nardozzi was not named in the original 113-count indictment against
Joyce. Joyce pleaded not guilty to the charges on Dec. 8 and is
currently free on a $250,000 bond.

Prosecutors have also fingered Joyce’s laweyr, Howard Cooper as taking
a role in Joyce’s corruption coverup. A motion filed earlier this
month asked a federal judge to remove Cooper from Joyce’s defense
team, accusing him of making “several material and false
representations” to the state Ethics Commission on behalf of Joyce.
Cooper has not been indicted, but prosecutors said Cooper helped Joyce
cover up at least two of his schemes, including the stock purchase,
and could provide important testimony at trial.

Erin Tiernan may be reached at etiernan@wickedlocal.com. Neal Simpson
contributed to this report.





https://no-click.mil/?https://www.patriotledger.com/news/20180404/prosecutors-in-joyce-case-earn-rebuke-from-legal-community


Prosecutors in Joyce case earn rebuke from legal community

By Neal Simpson
The Patriot Ledger
Posted Apr 4, 2018 at 4:47 PM

BOSTON — Federal prosecutors seeking to disqualify an attorney for
former state Sen. Brian Joyce from his upcoming corruption trial have
earned a rebuke from dozens of lawyers and several legal organizations
who accuse them of trying to to broaden their ability to have
defendants’ lawyers removed.

Prosecutors had argued that attorney Howard M. Cooper, founding
partner at Todd & Weld in Boston, should be stripped from Joyce’s
defense team at trial because Cooper has unwittingly helped Joyce
cover up some of his corrupt activities by submitting false statements
to the state Ethics Commission, making Cooper a potential witness to
Joyce’s crimes. But in an amicus brief submitted earlier this week, a
collection of lawyers and legal organizations argue that such thinking
would erode defendants’ Sixth Amendment right to their chosen counsel
and interfere with attorneys’ ability to represent their clients while
criminal charges are pending.

“Granting the present motion would threaten ethical and effective
advocacy by counsel in numerous other cases,” the brief reads. “It
would encourage the government to seek to disqualify counsel more
frequently in any of the array of circumstances in which defense
counsel may advocate on a client’s behalf and might present what the
government may later claim to be inaccurate information.”

The battle over the future of Joyce’s legal representation comes as
the former Milton Democrat faces a 113-count indictment accusing him
of turning his Beacon Hill office into a money-making venture where he
traded legislation and political influence for more than $1 million in
kickbacks, hundreds of pounds of free coffee and a 2014 Jeep. He was
arrested on the charges this past December and released on $250,000
bond.

A little more than a month after Joyce’s arrest, federal prosecutors
indicated that they would seek to disqualify Cooper from representing
Joyce at trial and could call him to testify about several statements
he made to the ethics commission on Joyce’s behalf. Some of those
statements had addressed the commission’s questions about whether the
senator had received free Dunkin’ Donuts coffee in exchange for
pushing favorable legislation, whether he’d filed legislation without
disclosing that it would benefit a client, and whether he’d appeared
before a state commission while concealing his financial investment in
the company.

Prosecutors have not suggested that Cooper was aware that the
statements were false, but said that Joyce had nonetheless “entangled
Attorney Cooper in the cover-up.” In a motion filed in late February,
prosecutors argued that Joyce had used Cooper’s statements to further
his crimes, making communications between the two exempt from
attorney-client privilege.

In response, Joyce accused prosecutors of trying to disqualify his
attorney by making him into a witness even through they hadn’t shown
any need for Cooper’s testimony. Joyce said he would even stipulate
that he himself had prepared and reviewed the statements that
prosecutors say were false.

Joyce, who is a lawyer, also argued Cooper had only submitted the
statements to defend Joyce against allegations of wrongdoing and had
not been involved in setting up the corrupt deals Joyce is accused of
making. Joyce hired Cooper and his firm, Todd & Weld, in March 2015
after Boston Globe reporters began asking Joyce’s office questions.

Joyce said disqualifying Cooper would violated his Sixth Amendment
right to choose his legal counsel and force him to find a new attorney
following the loss of his job, the end of his practice and “the
exhaustion of his resources.”

“Now the government takes aim at the one attorney who has represented
him throughout, in whom he reposes the greatest trust and confidence,
and ask the Court to require him to start over with new counsel he
does not want and cannot afford,” attorneys for Joyce and Cooper said
in a motion filed on their behalf. “This would be a cruel, unfair and
clearly unconstitutional blow.”

The Boston legal community apparently agrees. In a motion filed
Monday, a group including the Massachusetts Bar Association, the
Massachusetts Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the American
Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts and 71 individual attorneys
argued that the prosecutors’ request had “far-reaching and troubling
Sixth Amendment implications,” potentially opening the door for
prosecutors to have defense attorneys removed from a case by claiming
that they had previously presented inaccurate information on their
client’s behalf. The Boston Bar Association is seeking to file a
separate amicus brief.

“We believe the government’s motion threatens the constitutionally
protected right of a lawyer to present a client’s defense to courts
and to government agencies,” Jon Albano, president-elect of the Boston
Bar Association, said in a statement. “A lawyer should not be
disqualified for presenting a client’s side of a case when there is no
evidence that the lawyer knew the client was not telling the truth.”



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 12:19:51 -0400
Subject: Methinks one of Trump's many lawyers should call the FBI
dudes in DC and Beantown ASAP They are far too chicken to talk to me
or you N'esy Pas Mikey Gill?
To: sheri.dillon@morganlewis.com, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, hcooper <hcooper@toddweld.com>,
stateofcorruptionnh1 <stateofcorruptionnh1@gmail.com>, "Boston.Mail"
<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, mdcohen212 <mdcohen212@gmail.com>,
"hon.ralph.goodale" <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>,
Pierre.Parent@parl.gc.ca, "Gib.vanErt" <Gib.vanErt@scc-csc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
jonathan.albano@morganlewis.com, "Dale.Morgan"
<Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>

Sheri A. Dillon
1111 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20004-2541
United States
Phone +1.202.739.5749
sheri.dillon@morganlewis.com

 

---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Première ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 13:21:16 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: The LIEbranos latest Constitutional and
Legal Adviser Michael Fenrick denied receiving this email but several
computers did not
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.

There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.

Thanks again for your email.
______­­

Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

Merci encore pour votre courriel.


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 09:21:12 -0400
Subject: Fwd: The LIEbranos latest Constitutional and Legal Adviser
Michael Fenrick denied receiving this email but several computers did not
To: jagmeet.singh@ndp.ca, sfeinman <sfeinman@fahrllc.com>, premier
<premier@ontario.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.nt.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, "premier.ministre"
<premier.ministre@cex.gouv.qc.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, doug

<doug@fordnation.ca>, "francis.scarpaleggia"
<francis.scarpaleggia@parl.gc.ca>


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)" <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 12:51:40 +0000
Subject: RE: The LIEbranos latest Constitutional and Legal Adviser
Michael Fenrick denied receiving this email but several computers did not
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick.  Please be
assured  that your email will be reviewed.

If this is a media request, please forward your email to
media-medias@gnb.camedia-medias@gnb.ca>.  Thank you!

*************************************

Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
Nouveau-Brunswick.  Soyez assuré(e) que votre  courriel sera examiné.

Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à
media-medias@gnb.camedia-medias@gnb.ca>.  Merci!

 

---------- Original message ----------
From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 11:28:56 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15 Did
you order Harper and the NDP to ignore me as well???
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
lalanthier@hotmail.com

Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca

Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
lalanthier@hotmail.com

To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca

Thank you,

Merci ,



---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 11:28:12 +0000
Subject: RE: Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15 Did you order Harper
and the NDP to ignore me as well???
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.



---------- Original message ----------
From: Mario.Beaulieu@parl.gc.ca
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 11:28:58 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15 Did
you order Harper and the NDP to ignore me as well???
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Madame, monsieur,

Le bureau du député accuse réception de votre courriel. Soyez assuré-e
que nous vous répondrons dans les plus brefs délais possibles. Nous
vous remercions de votre intérêt.

Cordialement,

Olivier Lacelle
Attaché politique de Mario Beaulieu, député de La Pointe-de-L'Île
12 500, Boulevard Industriel
Pointe-aux-Trembles, Québec
H1B 5M7
Téléphone : 514-645-0101
Fax : 514-645-0032




---------- Original message ----------
From: Elizabeth.May@parl.gc.ca
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 11:28:56 +0000
Subject: Thank you for contacting the Office of Elizabeth May, O.C., M.P
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Thank you for contacting me. This response is to assure you that your
message has been received. I welcome and appreciate receiving comments
and questions from constituents.

I receive a much larger volume of correspondence (postal and email)
than the average MP. All emails are reviewed on a regular basis,
however due to the high volume of emails my office receives, I may not
be able to respond personally to each one.


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 07:28:02 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15 Did you order Harper
and the NDP to ignore me as well???
To: nbd_cna@liberal.ca, michael.fenrick@paliareroland.com,
pm@pm.gc.ca, justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, "bill.pentney"
< bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>,
info@ndp.ca, "philip.bryden" <philip.bryden@gov.ab.ca>, "Paul.Lynch"
< Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>, "Jacques.Poitras"

< Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "David.Akin" <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>,
"steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, michaelharris@ipolitics.ca,
"Gerald.Butts" <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, markbonokoski@gmail.com,
Mario.Beaulieu@parl.gc.ca, votezrichardmartel@gmail.com,
eric.dubois@npd.ca, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, "francis.scarpaleggia"
< francis.scarpaleggia@parl.gc.ca>, "andrew.scheer"
< andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, "maxime.bernier"
< maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>, "elizabeth.may"
< elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: "David.Raymond.Amos" <David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com>, motomaniac333
< motomaniac333@gmail.com>

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/nobody-safe-from-edmonton-blogger-charged-with-hate-crime-1.4161015

'Nobody was safe from it': Edmonton blogger charged with rare hate
crime targeted individuals across Canada
Police say Barry Winters, 62, made derogatory remarks about race,
gender, politics
Roberta Bell · CBC News · Posted: Jun 14, 2017 5:38 PM MT

https://www.liberal.ca/national-board-of-directors/


Who are we?

We are volunteers from across the country who care passionately about
Canada's future and promoting Liberal values. We are community
leaders, parents, and professionals who volunteer our time in this
role. The board works together to provide oversight and guidance to
the Party in matters both fiduciary, and strategic. We meet regularly
in person and by phone with the objective of ensuring the Party is
prepared for the next federal election. It is an honour to work with
such a distinct and talented group of individuals. Please don't
hesitate to reach out to us at nbd_cna@liberal.ca.

Suzanne Cowan

President, Liberal Party of Canada
Leader  Justin Trudeau
President       Suzanne Cowan
National Director       Azam Ishmael
National Vice-President (English)       Mira Ahmad
National Vice-President (French)        Elise Bartlett
Policy Secretary        Omar Raza
Party Secretary         Sam Bhalesar-Saran
Past President  Anna Gainey
Director, Liberal Party of Canada (Newfoundland & Labrador)     Jim Burton
Director, Liberal Party of Canada (Prince Edward Island)        Scott Barry
Director, Liberal Party of Canada (Nova Scotia)         John Gillis
Director, Liberal Party of Canada (New Brunswick)       Joel Reed
Director, Liberal Party of Canada (Québec)      Pierre Choquette
Director, Liberal Party of Canada (Ontario)     Tyler Banham
Director, Liberal Party of Canada (Manitoba)    Wendy Martin White
Director, Liberal Party of Canada (Saskatchewan)        Meghan McEachern
Director, Liberal Party of Canada (Alberta)     Robbie Schuett
Director, Liberal Party of Canada (British Columbia)    Manjot Hallen
Director, Liberal Party of Canada (Yukon)       Jeane Lassen
Director, Liberal Party of Canada (Northwest Territories)       Charles Blyth
Director, Liberal Party of Canada (Nunavut)
Caucus Representative   Francis Scarpaleggia
Co-Chair, Indigenous Peoples' Commission (Female)       Suzy Kies
Co-Chair, Indigenous Peoples' Commission (Male)         Conrad Desjarlais
President, National Women’s Liberal Commission  Amy Robichaud
President, Young Liberals of Canada     David Hickey
Co-Chair, Senior Liberals’ Commission (French)  Roger Légaré
Co-Chair, Senior Liberals’ Commission (English)         Doug Brydges
Leader’s Representative
Treasurer       John Herhalt
Revenue Chair   Stephen Bronfman
CEO, Federal Liberal Agency of Canada   Sachit Mehra
Campaign Co-Chair       Chris MacInnes
Constitutional and Legal Adviser (English)      Michael Fenrick
Constitutional and Legal Adviser (French)       Prachi Shah

Michael Fenrick B.A., M.A., LL.B.
Partner
155 WELLINGTON ST WEST,
35th FLOOR
TORONTO ON M5V 3H1
p: 416.646.7481
e: michael.fenrick@paliareroland.com

https://www.linkedin.com/in/michael-fenrick-420b6261/

Liberal Party of Canada • Parti Libéral du Canada
Constitutional and Legal Advisor (English)
Company Name Liberal Party of Canada • Parti Libéral du Canada
Dates Employed Apr 2018 – Present Employment Duration 3 mos
Location Toronto, Canada Area

Advising the National Board of the Liberal Party of Canada on
constitutional and legal matters.


Michael Fenrick has a broad civil litigation practice. He works with
clients to help them solve complex problems in areas as diverse as
constitutional law, corporate commercial litigation, class actions,
professional discipline, and labour and employment law. Michael has a
particular interest and  expertise in public law issues. He regularly
acts in matters before administrative tribunals and at all levels of
court in Ontario, as well as the Supreme Court of Canada.

In addition to his busy practice, Michael is very involved with the
Ontario Bar Association. He is an Executive Member of both the
constitutional and administrative law practice groups. Michael was
also recently appointed adjunct faculty by the University of Toronto,
Faculty of Law. He will be teaching constitutional law to graduate
students in the Global Professional LL.M. program.

Prior to joining the firm in 2009, Michael was Law Clerk to the
Honourable Justice Marshall Rothstein of the Supreme Court of Canada.
In this role, Michael assisted Justice Rothstein with a number of
leading cases in varied fields of law. While at Dalhousie Law School,
he received the University Medal in Law, in addition to numerous other
academic and advocacy prizes.
Education

    Dalhousie Law School, LL.B., 2008
    University of British Columbia, M.A., 2005
    University of King’s College, B.A., 2003

Bar Admissions

    Ontario, 2009


>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 18:22:05 -0400
>> Subject: Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15 Did you order Harper and
>> the NDP to ignore me as well???
>> To: Liberal / Assistance <nbd_cna@liberal.ca>, cmunroe@glgmlaw.com, pm
>> < pm@pm.gc.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, mcu
>> < mcu@justice.gc.ca>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>
>> How about Dizzy Lizzy May and the Bloc?
>>
>> On 1/6/16, Cmunroe (Liberal / Assistance) <nbd_cna@liberal.ca> wrote:
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "Cmunroe (Liberal / Assistance)" <nbd_cna@liberal.ca>
>> Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 19:28:25 +0000
>> Subject: Re: Attn Dr. John Gillis Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15
>> Trust that I called and tried to reason with a lot of Liberals begore
>> I am before the cour...
>> To: Motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> RealChange.ca | DuVraiChangement.ca
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------
>>
>> Cmunroe, Jan 6, 14:28
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I would ask that you please do not respond to this e-mail (in the
>> event that you were inclined to do so.)
>>
>> Let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Craig Munroe
>> (Party Legal and Constitutional Advisor)
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 11:09 AM
>> To: Craig Munroe <cmunroe@glgmlaw.com>; nbd_cna@liberal.ca; pm
>> < pm@pm.gc.ca>; ljulien@liberal.ca; pmilliken <pmilliken@cswan.com>;
>> bdysart <bdysart@smss.com>; bdysart <bdysart@stewartmckelvey.com>;
>> Braeden.Caley@vancouver.ca; robert.m.schuett@schuettlaw.com;
>> jda@nf.aibn.com; eclark@coxandpalmer.com; office@liberal.ns.ca;
>> president@lpco.ca; david@lpcm.ca; emerchant@merchantlaw.com
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; assistance@liberal.ca;
>> Karine Fortin <info@ndp.ca>; stephen.harper
>> < stephen.harper.a1@parl.gc.ca>
>> Subject: Re: Attn Dr. John Gillis Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15
>> Trust that I called and tried to reason with a lot of Liberals begore
>> I am before the court again on Monday Jan 11th
>>
>> On 1/6/16, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> BTW the nice guys who talked to me and didn't dismiss me I put in the
>>> BCC line
>>>
>>> Dr. John Gillis
>>> P.O. Box 723
>>> 5151 George Street, Suite 1400
>>> Halifax, Nova Scotia
>>> Canada B3J 2T3
>>> Tel: (902) 429-1993
>>> Email: office@liberal.ns.ca
>>>
>>> John Allan, President
>>> Liberal Party of Newfoundland & Labrador
>>> T: (709) 685-1230
>>> jda@nf.aibn.com
>>>
>>>
>>> Braeden Caley
>>> Office of the Mayor, City of Vancouver
>>>   604-809-9951
>>> Braeden.Caley@vancouver.ca,
>>>
>>>
>>> Britt Dysart QC
>>> Suite 600, Frederick Square
>>> 77 Westmorland Street
>>> P.O. Box 730
>>> Fredericton, NB, Canada
>>> E3B 5B4
>>>
>>> P 506.443.0153
>>> F 506.443.9948
>>>
>>>
>>> Evatt F. A. Merchant
>>> Merchant Law Group LLP
>>> First Nations Bank Bldg.
>>> 501-224 4th Ave. S.
>>> Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7K 5M5
>>> Phone: 306-653-7777
>>> Email: emerchant@merchantlaw.com
>>>
>>>
>>> Ewan W. Clark
>>> Montague
>>> Phone: (902) 838-5275
>>> Fax: (902) 838-3440
>>> eclark@coxandpalmer.com
>>>
>>> Robert M. Schuett
>>> #200, 602 11th Avenue SW
>>> Calgary Alberta T2R 1J8
>>> Phone: (403) 705-1261
>>> Fax: (403) 705-1265
>>> robert.m.schuett@schuettlaw.com
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.liberal.ca/national-board-of-directors/
>>>
>>> Who are we?
>>>
>>> We are volunteers from across the country who care passionately about
>>> Canada’s future and promoting Liberal values. We are community
>>> leaders, parents, and professionals who volunteer our time in this
>>> role. The board works together to provide oversight and guidance to
>>> the Party in matters both fiduciary, and strategic. We meet regularly
>>> in person and by phone with the objective of ensuring the Party is
>>> prepared for the next federal election. It is an honour to work with
>>> such a distinct and talented group of individuals. Please don’t
>>> hesitate to reach out to us at nbd_cna@liberal.ca.
>>> Anna Gainey
>>>
>>> President, Liberal Party of Canada
>>>
>>> T @annamgainey
>>> Leader        Justin Trudeau
>>> National President    Anna Gainey
>>> Acting National Director      Christina Topp
>>> National Vice-President (English)     Chris MacInnes
>>> National Vice-President (French)      Marie Tremblay
>>> National Policy Chair         Maryanne Kampouris
>>> National Membership Secretary         Leanne Bourassa
>>> Past National President       Mike Crawley
>>> President, Liberal Party of Newfoundland & Labrador   John Allan
>>> President, Liberal Party of Prince Edward Island      Ewan Clark
>>> President, Nova Scotia Liberal Party  John Gillis
>>> President, New Brunswick Liberal Association  Britt Dysart
>>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Québec)   Linda Julien
>>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Ontario)  Tyler Banham
>>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Manitoba)         Sachit Mehra
>>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Saskatchewan)     Evatt Merchant
>>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Alberta)  Robbie Schuett
>>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (British Columbia)         Braeden
>>> Caley
>>> President, Federal Liberal Association of Yukon       Blake Rogers
>>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Northwest Territories)    Rosanna
>>> Nicol
>>> President, Federal Liberal Association of Nunavut     Michel Potvin
>>> Caucus Representative         Francis Scarpaleggia
>>> Co-Chair, Aboriginal Peoples’ Commission (Female)     Caitlin Tolley
>>> Co-Chair, Aboriginal Peoples’ Commission (Male)       Kevin Seesequasis
>>> President, National Women’s Liberal Commission        Carlene Variyan
>>> President, Young Liberals of Canada   Justin Kaiser
>>> Co-Chair, Senior Liberals’ Commission (French)        Anne Adams
>>> Co-Chair, Senior Liberals’ Commission (English)       Kenneth D.
>>> Halliday
>>> Chair, Council of Presidents  Veena Bhullar
>>> Chief Financial Officer       Chuck Rifici
>>> Chief Revenue Officer         Stephen Bronfman
>>> CEO, Federal Liberal Agency of Canada         Mike Eizenga
>>> National Campaign Co-Chair    Katie Telford
>>> Constitutional and Legal Adviser (English)    Craig Munroe
>>> Constitutional and Legal Adviser (French)     Elise Bartlett
>>>
>>> Craig T. Munroe, Partner
>>> Email: cmunroe@glgmlaw.com
>>> Phone: (604) 891-1176
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 19:32:00 -0400
>>> Subject: Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15 the CBC, the RCMP, their
>>> new boss Justin Trudeau and his Ministers of Justice and Defence etc
>>> cannot deny their knowledge of Paragraphs 81, 82, 83, 84, and 85 now
>>> CORRECT G$?
>>> To: Paul.Samyn@freepress.mb.ca, "carolyn.bennett"
>>> < carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca>, Doug@dougeyolfson.ca,
>>> doug.eyolfson@parl.gc.ca, fpcity@freepress.mb.ca,
>>> w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca, "Paul.Lynch" <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>,
>>> "Marianne.Ryan" <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, sunrayzulu
>>> < sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca,
>>> "john.green" <john.green@gnb.ca>, chiefape <chiefape@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, gopublic
>>> < gopublic@cbc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, radical
>>> < radical@radicalpress.com>, newsonline <newsonline@bbc.co.uk>,
>>> newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, nmoore <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>,
>>> andre <andre@jafaust.com>
>>>
>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>>>
>>> David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15
>>>
>>> 81.  The Plaintiff states that matters of harassment that the police
>>> refuse to investigate would have entered the realm of ridiculous in
>>> 2012 if the reasons behind the suicides of teenagers did not become
>>> well known by the corporate media. In the summer of 2012 a new member
>>> of the FPS who as a former member of the EPS had inspired a lawsuit
>>> for beating a client in Edmonton called the Plaintiff and accused him
>>> of something he could not do even if he wanted to while he was arguing
>>> many lawyers byway of emails about a matter concerning cyber stalking
>>> that was before the SCC.  The member of the FPF accused the Plaintiff
>>> of calling the boss of Bullying Canada thirty times. At that time his
>>> MagicJack account had been hacked and although he could receive
>>> incoming calls, the Plaintiff could not call out to anyone. The
>>> Plaintiff freely sent the FPF his telephone logs sourced from
>>> MagicJack after his account restored without the Crown having to issue
>>> a warrant to see his telephone records. He asked the FPF and the RCMP
>>> where did the records of his phone calls to and from the FPF and the
>>> RCMP go if his account had not been hacked. The police never
>>> responded. Years later a Troll sent Dean Roger Ray a message through
>>> YouTube providing info about the Plaintiff’s MagicJack account with
>>> the correct password. Dean Roger Ray promptly posted two videos in
>>> YouTube clearly displaying the blatant violation of privacy likely to
>>> protect himself from the crime. The Plaintiff quickly pointed out the
>>> videos to the RCMP and they refused to investigate as usual. At about
>>> the same point in time the Plaintiff noticed that the CBC had
>>> published a record of a access to information requests. On the list of
>>> requests he saw his name along with several employees of CBC and the
>>> boss of Bullying Canada. The Plaintiff called the CBC to make
>>> inquiries about what he saw published on the Internet. CBC told him it
>>> was none of his business and advised him if he thought his rights had
>>> been offended to file a complaint. It appears the Plaintiff that
>>> employees of CBC like other questionable Crown Corporations such as
>>> the RCMP rely on their attorneys far too much to defend them from
>>> litigation they invite from citizens they purportedly serve. The
>>> employees of CBC named within the aforementioned and the CBC Legal
>>> Dept. are very familiar with the Plaintiff and of the Crown barring
>>> him from legislative properties while he running for public office.
>>>
>>> 82.  The Plaintiff states that any politician or police officer should
>>> have seen enough of Barry Winter’s WordPress blog by June 22, 2015
>>> particularly after the very unnecessary demise of two men in Alberta
>>> because of the incompetence of the EPS. Barry Winters was blogging
>>> about the EPS using battering ram in order to execute a warrant for a
>>> 250 dollar bylaw offence at the same time Professor Kris Wells
>>> revealed in a televised interview that the EPS member who was killed
>>> was the one investigating the cyber harassment of him. It was obvious
>>> why the police and politicians ignored all the death threats, sexual
>>> harassment, cyberbullying and hate speech of a proud Zionist who
>>> claimed to be a former CF officer who now working for the Department
>>> of National Defence (DND). It is well known that no politician in
>>> Canada is allowed to sit in Parliament as a member of the major
>>> parties unless they support Israel. Since 2002 the Plaintiff made it
>>> well known that he does not support Israeli actions and was against
>>> the American plan to make war on Iraq. On Aril 1, 2003 within two
>>> weeks of the beginning of the War on Iraq, the US Secret Service
>>> threatened to practice extraordinary rendition because false
>>> allegations of a Presidential threat were made against him by an
>>> American court. However, the Americans and the Crown cannot deny that
>>> what he said in two courts on April 1, 2003 because he published the
>>> recordings of what was truly said as soon as he got the court tapes.
>>> The RCMP knows those words can still be heard on the Internet today.
>>> In 2009, the Plaintiff began to complain of Barry Winters about
>>> something far more important to Canada as nation because of Winters’
>>> bragging of being one of 24 CF officers who assisted the Americans in
>>> the planning the War on Iraq in 2002. In the Plaintiff’s humble
>>> opinion the mandate of the DND is Defence not Attack. He is not so
>>> naive to think that such plans of war do not occur but if Barry
>>> Winters was in fact one of the CF officers who did so then he broke
>>> his oath to the Crown the instant he bragged of it in his blog. If
>>> Winters was never an officer in the CF then he broke the law by
>>> impersonating an officer. The Plaintiff downloaded the emails of the
>>> Privy Council about Wikileaks. The bragging of Barry Winters should
>>> have been investigated in 2009 before CBC reported that documents
>>> released by WikiLeaks supported his information about Canadian
>>> involvement in the War on Iraq.
>>>
>>> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>
>>> January 13, 2015
>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>
>>> December 8, 2014
>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>
>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>
>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>
>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>
>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>
>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>
>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>
>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>> essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An
>>> ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear
>>> and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,”
>>> or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of
>>> terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states
>>> “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of
>>> Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an
>>> ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the
>>> Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
>>>
>>> One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty
>>> was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the
>>> amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time
>>> denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time
>>> self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of
>>> “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the
>>> G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious
>>> behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister
>>> Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully
>>> cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits
>>> are not.
>>>
>>> Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal
>>> mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the
>>> world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy”
>>> David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security
>>> and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can
>>> and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing
>>> “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war
>>> criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending
>>> tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
>>>
>>> In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
>>> “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
>>> successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing,
>>> marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian
>>> military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern
>>> equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are
>>> antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five
>>> years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that
>>> won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
>>>
>>> My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
>>> Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin
>>> Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not
>>> served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social
>>> democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and
>>> other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet
>>> these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to
>>> other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
>>>
>>> Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security,
>>> and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before
>>> shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
>>>
>>> Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now
>>>
>>> From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
>>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
>>> Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and
>>> the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still
>>> alive
>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
>>> your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply
>>> to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
>>> Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the
>>> War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
>>> To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil,
>>> Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, john.adams@cse-cst.gc.ca,
>>> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, stoffp1 <stoffp1@parl.gc.ca>,
>>> dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca,
>>> milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca,
>>> sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari
>>> < smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
>>> susan@blueskystrategygroup.com, Don@blueskystrategygroup.com,
>>> eugene@blueskystrategygroup.com, americas@aljazeera.net
>>> Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice" <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin"
>>> < terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower
>>> < whistleblower@ctv.ca>
>>>
>>> I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David
>>> Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's
>>> Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on
>>> CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To
>>> be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested
>>> that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise
>>> if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else
>>> about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact  that  your
>>> old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English
>>> never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is
>>> interesting though
>>>
>>> http://www.blueskystrategygroup.com/index.php/team/don-newman/
>>>
>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/media/story/2010/05/04/al-jazeera-english-
>>> launch.html
>>>
>>> Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
>>> this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
>>> Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad
>>> Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
>>>
>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
>>>
>>> The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a
>>> shy political animal
>>>
>>> Veritas Vincit
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>> 902 800 0369
>>>
>>> Enjoy Mr Weston
>>> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/news/story/2011/05/15/weston-iraq-invasion-w
>>> ikileaks.html
>>>
>>> "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
>>> brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
>>> says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
>>> to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
>>> including a Canadian general.
>>>
>>> That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
>>> who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
>>> U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was
>>> also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
>>> prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
>>>
>>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2010/06/canada-and-united-states.html
>>>
>>> "I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
>>> being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
>>> demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
>>> "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
>>> into the US policy.
>>>
>>> At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
>>> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
>>> in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
>>> report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was
>>> never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
>>> were deployed WMD.
>>>
>>> Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
>>> invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
>>> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
>>> (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
>>> about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
>>> that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
>>> authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
>>>
>>> There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
>>> its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
>>> to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
>>> folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
>>> upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions
>>> are to met before US troop can redeploy?  Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>> and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of
>>> Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them
>>> correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the
>>> George W Bush administration was onerous
>>>
>>> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
>>> military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
>>> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
>>> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
>>> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
>>> operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
>>> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
>>> ....not necessarily in that order. "
>>>
>>> You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
>>> Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
>>>
>>> http://www.socom.mil/SOCOMHome/Pages/ContactUSSOCOM.aspx
>>>
>>>
>>> 84.  The Plaintiff states that the RCMP is well aware that he went to
>>> western Canada in 2104 at the invitation of a fellow Maritimer in
>>> order to assist in his attempt to investigate the murders of many
>>> people in Northern BC. The Plaintiff has good reasons to doubt his
>>> fellow Maritimer’s motives. The fact that he did not tell the
>>> Plaintiff until he had arrived in BC that he had invited a Neo Nazi he
>>> knew the Plaintiff strongly disliked to the same protest that he was
>>> staging in front of the court house in Prince George on August 21,
>>> 2014. The Plaintiff was looking forward to meeting Lonnie Landrud so
>>> he ignored the Neo Nazi. Several months after their one and only
>>> meeting, Lonnie Landrud contacted the Plaintiff and asked him to
>>> publish a statement of his on the Internet and to forward it to anyone
>>> he wished. The Plaintiff obliged Landrud and did an investigation of
>>> his own as well. He has informed the RCMP of his opinion of their
>>> actions and has done nothing further except monitor the criminal
>>> proceedings the Crown has placed against the Neo Nazi in BC and save
>>> his videos and webpages and that of his associates. The words the
>>> Plaintiff stated in public in Prince George BC on August 21, 2014 were
>>> recorded by the Neo Nazi and published on the Internet and the RCMP
>>> knows the Plaintiff stands by every word. For the public record the
>>> Plaintiff truly believes what Lonnie Landrud told him despite the fact
>>> that he does not trust his Neo Nazi associates. Therefore the
>>> Plaintiff had no ethical dilemma whatsoever in publishing the
>>> statement Lonnie Landrud mailed to him in a sincere effort to assist
>>> Lonnie Landrud’s pursuit of justice. The Crown is well aware that
>>> Plaintiff’s former lawyer, Barry Bachrach once had a leader of the
>>> American Indian Movement for a client and that is why he ran against
>>> the former Minister of Indian Affairs for his seat in the 39th
>>> Parliament.
>>>
>>> 85.  The Plaintiff states that while he was out west he visited
>>> Edmonton AB several times and met many people. He visited the home of
>>> Barry Winters and all his favourite haunts in the hope of meeting in
>>> person the evil person who had been sexually harassing and threatening
>>> to kill him and his children for many years. The Crown cannot deny
>>> that Winters invited him many times. On June 13, 2015 Barry Winters
>>> admitted the EPS warned him the Plaintiff was looking for him.
>>>
>>> On 12/21/15, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: "Rabson, Mia" <Mia.Rabson@freepress.mb.ca>
>>>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 20:45:36 +0000
>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Wab Kinew
>>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> I will be out of the office until Monday, January 4.
>>>> If you need immediate assistance please contact our city desk at 613
>>>> 697 7292 or fpcity@freepress.mb.ca.
>>>> Happy Holidays!
>>>>
>>>> Mia Rabson
>>>> Parliamentary Bureau Chief
>>>> Winnipeg Free Press
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: "Sarra R. Deane" <s.deane@uwinnipeg.ca>
>>>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 20:10:12 +0000
>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Wab Kinew
>>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> I will be out of the office until Thursday, Nov. 12th.  I will
>>>> respond to emails upon my return. Miigwech and all the best.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:45:29 -0400
>>>> Subject: Fwd: Attn Wab Kinew
>>>> To: mia.rabson@freepress.mb.ca, Paul.Samyn@freepress.mb.ca,
>>>> "carolyn.bennett" <carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca>, Doug@dougeyolfson.ca,
>>>> doug.eyolfson@parl.gc.ca
>>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/peacemaker-363019331.html
>>>>
>>>> Peacemaker
>>>> Group pushes for Truth and Reconciliation chairman to get Nobel Prize
>>>>
>>>> By: Mia Rabson
>>>> Posted: 12/19/2015 3:00 AM   | Last Modified: 12/19/2015 6:12 AM
>>>>
>>>> " Murray Sinclair already has an impressive resumé.
>>>>
>>>> He's the first aboriginal judge appointed to the bench in Manitoba,
>>>> co-commissioner of the Aboriginal Justice Inquiry and chairman of the
>>>> Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
>>>>
>>>> But if a group of Canadians has its way, he will get one of the
>>>> highest honours in the world to add to the list: Nobel Peace Prize
>>>> recipient.
>>>>
>>>> "He and Phil Fontaine should share a Nobel Peace Prize," said Wab
>>>> Kinew, associate vice-president for indigenous relations at the
>>>> University of Winnipeg.
>>>>
>>>> Kinew said a group of people in Winnipeg, Toronto and Ottawa are
>>>> collaborating to nominate the two men, who they believe are jointly
>>>> responsible for giving back hope to Canada's indigenous people that
>>>> hasn't existed in a long time.
>>>>
>>>> "They made it into something that is peace-building and
>>>> nation-building," Kinew said. "It has really transformed our country."
>>>>
>>>> Mia Rabson, Ottawa Bureau Chief
>>>> 613-369–4824
>>>>
>>>> Paul
>>>>   Samyn, Editor
>>>> 204–697–7295
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:05:01 -0400
>>>> Subject: Attn Wab Kinew
>>>> To: w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca, "Paul.Lynch"
>>>> < Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>, "Marianne.Ryan"
>>>> < Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2015/12/21/why-do-canadians-need
>>>> -to-know-anything-about-injuns/
>>>>
>>>> http://www.uwinnipeg.ca/about/administration/avp-igca.htmlAssociate
>>>> Vice-President, Indigenous Affairs
>>>>
>>>> Wab Kinew
>>>> phone: 204.789.9931
>>>> email: w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca
>>>> Biography/Publications
>>>>
>>>> Executive Assistant
>>>>
>>>> Sarra Deane
>>>> phone: 204.988.7121
>>>> email: s.deane@uwinnipeg.ca
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --- Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are
>> confidential and subject to copyright. They are intended only for the
>> use of the intended recipient(s) and may be privileged. If you are not
>> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review,
>> retransmission, conversion to hard copy, copying, circulation or other
>> use of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you
>> are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately
>> by return e-mail, and delete this message and any attachments from
>> your system.
>>
>> --- Avis de confidentialité : Ce message et toute pièce jointe sont
>> confidentiels et assujettis au droit d’auteur. Il est de l’usage
>> exclusif du ou des destinataire(s) visé(s) et peuvent être
>> confidentiels. Si vous n’êtes pas le(s) destinataire(s) visé(s), nous
>> attirons votre attention sur le fait qu’il est strictement interdit
>> d’utiliser cette information, de la transmettre, de l’imprimer sur
>> papier, de la copier, de la distribuer ou de la diffuser. Si vous
>> n’êtes pas le destinataire visé, veuillez en aviser immédiatement
>> l’expéditeur par courriel électronique et détruire ce message et toute
>> copie de celui-ci.
>>
>> --------------------------------
>> This email is a service from Liberal / Assistance.
>>
>>
>> [J6PE8E-0WQN]
>>
>
>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Mr. Amos,
We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
not be responding to further emails on this matter.

Department of Justice

On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:

> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>
> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>
> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>
>
> The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>
> 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau?
>
>
> Vertias Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
>  Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>
> http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc
>
>
> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
> Senator Arlen Specter
> United States Senate
> Committee on the Judiciary
> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
> Washington, DC 20510
>
> Dear Mr. Specter:
>
> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
> raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that
> these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in
> contact
> with you about this previously.
>
> Very truly yours,
> Barry A. Bachrach
> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>
>
>
>
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/new-brunswick-integrity-commissioner-conflict-of-interest-boudreau-1.4154004
>
> Integrity commissioner calls for tougher conflict-of-interest law
> N.B. legislation should apply to apparent conflicts, not just actual
> ones, Alexandre Deschênes says
> By Jacques Poitras, CBC News Posted: Jun 12, 2017 6:30 AM AT
>
> Alexandre Deschênes's first act as commissioner was to deal with
> Victor Boudreau's 20 per cent investment in Shediac Campground Ltd., a
> proposed 700-site facility that has generated local opposition.
> (Jacques Poitras/CBC)
>
> New Brunswick's integrity commissioner says the conflict-of-interest
> law for politicians should be toughened to clarify cases such as
> cabinet minister Victor Boudreau's former investment in a proposed
> campground near Parlee Beach.
>
> Alexandre Deschênes said earlier this year that Boudreau's stake in
> the project did not put him in a conflict of interest but that the
> appearance of a conflict was "inevitable."
>
> Unlike other conflict-of-interest laws, "our act does not apply to an
> apparent conflict of interest," he said in an interview with CBC News.
> "It's not in there."
>
> Previous commissioners suggested law
>
> Boudreau recused himself from Parlee Beach issues anyway, even though
> he didn't technically have to. The law said ministers aren't in a
> conflict if decisions that affect their private interests also apply
> to the general public.
>
>     Boudreau recuses himself from Parlee Beach controversy
>     Victor Boudreau case shows 'huge loophole' in conflict law, ethics
> group says
>
> "Mr. Boudreau could have gone on and said, 'I'm the minister of health
> and I'm going to make decisions that apply to the general public and
> the act allows it,'" Deschênes said.
>
> "If you'd had the words 'apparent conflict of interest' [in the law]
> it would have been clear."
>
> Deschênes pointed out two of his predecessors as conflict-of-interest
> commissioner, Pat Ryan and Stuart Stratton, recommended expanding the
> act to include the appearance of conflicts.
>
> "It started out way back," he said. "We're looking at almost a decade
> here where the suggestion has been made that apparent conflict of
> interest ought to be included in the act. It's not been done.
>
> "But as a commissioner, I will be following what they've been doing
> and I will be recommending it when I file a report."
>
> Updated conflict act
>
> The Gallant Liberals passed amendments to update the Members Conflict
> of Interest Act during the spring session of the legislature, but they
> did not include a ban on perceived conflicts.
>
> Progressive Conservative MLA Brian MacDonald has also called for the
> Liberals to fix what he calls "a gap in the law."
>
>     'Gap in the law': PC critic suggests review of conflict law
>     Premier backs Victor Boudreau's involvement in Parlee Beach issue​
>
> Deschênes was appointed the province's integrity commissioner last
> year. The new role incorporates the role of conflict-of-interest
> watchdog and registrar of lobbyists, and in September it will also
> include the Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act.
>
> Victor
>
> Cabinet minister Victor Boudreau recused himself from the Parlee Beach
> issues anyway, even though the law said ministers aren't in a conflict
> if decisions that affect their private interests also apply to the
> general public. (CBC)
>
> Deschênes's first act as commissioner was to deal with Boudreau's 20
> per cent investment in Shediac Campground Ltd., a proposed 700-site
> facility that has generated local opposition.
>
> As health minister, Boudreau oversees the public health offices, and
> his department was part of a working group looking at how to deal with
> fecal contamination at Parlee Beach. One option the group looked at
> was a moratorium on new development near the beach.
>
> That would have affected the proposed campground.
>
>     'I told him, and he made it public, that the appearance of
> conflict in this case was absolutely inevitable. He couldn't get
> around it. It was there.'
>
>     - Alexandre Deschênes
>
> The law bans ministers from making decisions that affect their
> "private interest," but it makes an exception if the decision applies
> to the broader public, even if the minister would still benefit.
>
> Deschênes said in his letter to Boudreau in March that "one could
> argue" a decision on a moratorium would affect the broader public.
>
> "Under the act, he might have been entitled to continue to have
> discussions that applied to the general population, even though he was
> part of [the project] at that point," Deschênes said in an interview
> last week.
>
> "I told him, and he made it public, that the appearance of conflict in
> this case was absolutely inevitable. He couldn't get around it. It was
> there."
> An MP's perceived conflict matters
>
> The federal conflict of interest code for MPs also includes an
> exception for decisions that affect the general public, but it
> includes an explicit reference to perceived conflicts.
>
> Boudreau put his investment in a blind trust in 2014, which meant he
> had no role in the running of the business. But the value of his stake
> would have been affected by a moratorium on future development.
>
> Parlee beach
>
> In May, Victor Boudreau announced he was giving up his investment in
> the campground on Parlee Beach altogether.
>
> He said in March he learned of the potential moratorium Feb. 28 and
> met with Deschênes March 2, the first date they could arrange it.
>
> "That perception is the issue," Boudreau said at the time. "And if the
> perception is the issue, and the perception is what's going to be
> prevent us from getting to the bottom of it, then I'm prepared to
> recuse myself from all activities relating to this committee."
>
> Last month he announced that he was giving up his investment in the
> campground altogether.
>
> Deschênes said he believes most ministers and MLAs would do the same
> thing if he told them there was an apparent, but not actual, conflict.
>
> "In most cases I think they will listen and they will do what has to
> be done to put an end to an apparent conflict of interest, although
> technically they could continue to do what they want to do."
>
>
>
> 6 Comments
>
> David Raymond Amos
>
> I sure hope the new integrity commissioner finally does his job and
> answers me in writing
>
>
>
> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>
> Hon. Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.
> Integrity Commissioner
>
> Hon. Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., who resides in Bathurst, N.B., is a
> native of Kedgwick, N.B., and is married to Huguette (Savoie)
> Deschênes. They have two sons.
>
> He studied at Saint-Joseph University (now Université de Moncton) from
> 1960 to 1962, University of Ottawa from 1962-1965 (B.A.), and
> University of New Brunswick (LL.B., 1968). He was admitted to the Law
> Society of New Brunswick in 1968. He was legal counsel to the
> Department of Justice in Fredericton from 1968 to 1971. He was in
> private practice from 1972 to 1982 and specialized in civil litigation
> as a partner in the law firm of Michaud, Leblanc, Robichaud, and
> Deschênes. While residing in Shediac, N.B., he served on town council
> and became the first president of the South East Economic Commission.
> He is a past president of the Richelieu Club in Shediac.
>
> In 1982, he was appointed a judge of the Court of Queen’s Bench of New
> Brunswick and of the Court of Appeal of New Brunswick in 2000.
>
> On July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the Court Martial Appeal Court of
> Canada.
>
> While on the Court of Appeal of New Brunswick, he was appointed
> President of the provincial Judicial Council and in 2012 Chairperson
> of the Federal Electoral Boundaries Commission for the Province of New
> Brunswick for the 2015 federal election.
>
> He was appointed Conflict of Interest Commissioner in December 2016
> and became New Brunswick’s first Integrity Commissioner on December
> 16, 2016 with responsibilities for conflict of interest issues related
> to Members of the Legislative Assembly. As of April 1, 2017 he
> supervises lobbyists of public office holders under the Lobbyists’
> Registration Act.
>
> As of September 1, 2017, he will be assuming the functions presently
> held by the Access to Information and Privacy Commissioner.
>
>
>

 Suzanne Cowan
nbd_cna@liberal.ca.

President, Liberal Party of Canada

Liberal Party of Canada
350 Albert Street, Suite 920
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 6M8

Toll free: 1 888 LIBERAL (542-3725)

1-888-542-3725

assistance@liberal.ca

Mr. Jim Vincent J. Burton FRI - Residential Sales | Real Estate Institute ...
https://memberservices.membee.com/feeds/.../cid/.../Mr-Jim-Vincent-J-Burton-FRI
Jim Burton has been successfully selling Real Estate in St. John's for
30 Years. ... Hope Air", Chairperson of the "Liberal Party of Canada -
Newfoundland & Labrador" and ... Jim can be reached at (709) 682-8663
or vjamesburton@gmail.com

Scott Barry - Liberal Party of PEI
www.liberalpei.ca/staff/ewan-clark/
Scott Barry. Scott Barry. President. sbarry@stewartmckelvey.com · › /
Staff / Scott Barry ... Contact Liberal Party of PEI at 902-368-3449
or 1-877-740-3449


Director, Liberal Party of Canada (Nova Scotia)         John Gillis

P.O. Box 723
5151 George Street, Suite 1400
Halifax, Nova Scotia
Canada B3J 2T3

Tel: (902) 429-1993
Fax: (902) 423-1624

Email: office@liberal.ns.ca


Director, Liberal Party of Canada (New Brunswick)       Joel Reed

715 Brunswick Street
Fredericton NB E3B 1H8

506-453-3950  or  1-800-442-4902
Fax: 506-453-2476

Keiller Zed, Executive Director
Email: keiller.zed@nbliberal.ca


Director, Liberal Party of Canada (Québec)      Pierre Choquette

LPC(Q) Office in Montreal

35 rue De Port-Royal Est
Suite 300
Montréal, Québec
H3L 3T1

Telephone : (514) 381-8888 x302 or x314
Toll free : (800) 361-8839
Fax : (514) 381-1515
pchoquette@mondea.ca

quebec@liberal.ca

Montréal

Suite 501
4446 St-Laurent Blvd
Montréal, QC
Canada H2W 1Z5
Tel : 514-844-6665

 The McGill-HEC Montréal EMBA graduates succeed in a wide variety of
fields, including politics. Pierre Choquette is a great example.
Pierre, a 2013 McGill-HEC Montréal EMBA graduate, was recently elected
president of the Liberal Party of Canada, Quebec section*.

His main objective as president will be to work with his team to
prepare the party, its associations and its campaigners for the next
federal election, in 2019.  Among other things, they are targeting
improvement in recruitment, financing, communications and organization
of the associations and party in Quebec.

* The EMBA McGill-HEC Montreal takes no political position, but wishes
to highlight successes of its graduates.

Director, Liberal Party of Canada (Ontario)     Tyler Banham

Liberal Party of Canada (Ontario)
55 Eglinton Ave East, Suite 503
Toronto, ON
M4P 1G8

Phone : (416) 921-2844

Tyler Banham President president@lpco.ca

Director, Liberal Party of Canada (Manitoba)    Wendy Martin White

https://twitter.com/WMartinWhite/with_replies

wendy@wmwlaw.ca
 Wendy Martin White
@WMartinWhite

Criminal defence lawyer: It's easy to do justice...it's hard to do
right wendy@wmwlaw.ca 204.396.9877

Manitoba
Molgat Place
635 Broadway
Winnipeg, Manitoba
R3C 0X1
Phone: 1-888-LIBERAL
(1-888-542-3725)
Fax: (204) 284-1492

David Johnson
Executive Director
djohnson@liberal.ca

Director, Liberal Party of Canada (Saskatchewan)        Meghan McEachern


Liberal Party of Canada (Saskatchewan)
Telephone:
1-888-LIBERAL (542-3725)
Email: Saskatchewan@Liberal.ca

Director, Liberal Party of Canada (Alberta)     Robbie Schuett

Liberal Party of Canada in Alberta (LPCA)

308-10240 124th Street NW
Edmonton, Alberta T5N 3W6
Telephone:
(780) 328-3889
Fax: (613) 235-7208
Email: alberta@liberal.ca


robert.m.schuett@schuettlaw.com

Director, Liberal Party of Canada (British Columbia)   Manjot Hallen

Address
460 - 580 Hornby St.
Vancouver, BC V6C 3B6
General Inquiries
1-888-LIBERAL (542-3725)
BC Office
Phone (604) 664-3777
1-888-411-6511 (Toll free)
Fax 1-877-411-6511
Email: assistance@liberal.ca



mhallen@warnetthallen.com

With well over 1,000 cases to his credit, personal injury and car
accident lawyer Manjot Hallen brings a wealth of experience to every
client assignment. A business and community leader with a quick smile,
Manjot never met a party that he didn’t like and vice versa. A lawyer
since 2005, he is a member of the Canadian Bar Association, Trial
Lawyers Association of British Columbia and the South Asian Bar
Association (BC). Manjot has lectured on personal injury issues for
the Trial Lawyers Association of BC and the Continuing Legal Education
Society of BC. Prior to practicing law, Manjot worked in government
assisting several federal cabinet Ministers. He is currently the
President of the Liberal Party of Canada (BC). Manjot is also the
Vice-Chair for the BC Children’s Hospital A Night of Miracles Gala. In
his personal time, Manjot enjoys running, crossfit, hockey and
climbing the Grouse Grind. Ever the idealist, he looks forward to the
day when a person can be judged not by the colour of their skin or who
they love, but by the content of their character. Manjot is fluent in
Punjabi and understands Hindi.
604-737-3300 | mhallen@warnetthallen.com | LinkedIn

460 - 580 Hornby St.
Vancouver, BC V6C 3B6
General Inquiries
1-888-LIBERAL (542-3725)
BC Office
Phone (604) 664-3777
1-888-411-6511 (Toll free)
Fax 1-877-411-6511
Email: assistance@liberal.ca


Constitutional and Legal Adviser (English)      Michael Fenrick

 Michael Fenrick B.A., M.A., LL.B.
Partner

p: 416.646.7481
e: michael.fenrick@paliareroland.com
f: 416.646.4301
Download Contact Icon Printable Bio Icon

Constitutional and Legal Adviser (French)       Prachi Shah

    +1 514 764 3658
    E
    prachi.shah@clydeco.ca
Main office
    T
    +1 514 843 3777

 

 https://www.ourcommons.ca/DocumentViewer/en/42-1/ETHI/meeting-123/evidence


ETHI-123 (October 30, 2018)




House of Commons Emblem

Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics


NUMBER 123 
l
1st SESSION 
l
42nd PARLIAMENT 

EVIDENCE

Tuesday, October 30, 2018

[Recorded by Electronic Apparatus]

  (1100)  

[English]

    This is the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, meeting 123. Pursuant to Standing Order 108(3)(h)(vii), this is the study of the breach of personal information involving Cambridge Analytica and Facebook.
    Today we have with us from the Conservative Party of Canada, Trevor Bailey, the privacy officer and director of membership; from the Liberal Party of Canada, Michael Fenrick, constitutional and legal adviser, national board of directors; and from the New Democratic Party, Jesse Calvert, director of operations.
    We'll start off with Mr. Bailey for 10 minutes.
    My name is Trevor Bailey. I'm the Conservative Party of Canada's privacy officer. I'd like to thank the committee for inviting me here today to discuss our privacy policy, and I look forward to answering any questions you may have surrounding that policy.
    I've been the privacy officer for the Conservative Party for approximately one year in addition to my role as director of membership for the party.
    The Conservative Party of Canada has had a formal privacy policy in place, including the role of privacy officer, for approximately six years. Though I am relatively new to this privacy role, I've held senior positions in the membership and fundraising departments for the past seven years. In those roles, I've had or shared the responsibility to oversee our data, access thereto and its authorized distribution.
    The privacy officer role is built around our party's commitment to protecting the privacy of Canadians. This commitment is important to the Conservative Party of Canada. That commitment includes taking great care to keep both confidential and secure all information in our possession that relates to the personal information Canadians willingly provide to us or is passed to us by Elections Canada as laid out in the Canada Elections Act. That information includes surname, given names, civic address and mailing address. Other information the party may ask for and receive from individuals, like an email address, phone number, gender and date of birth, is also information we include as covered by our privacy policy and is collected through our website or in response to a mail piece with that person's consent.
    As part of our privacy policy, any person may unsubscribe from our email, mail or phone lists at any time using links provided in each email message, clicking on our privacy policy at conservative.ca or contacting the party directly.
    As this committee would know, as a federal political party registered under the Canada Elections Act, the Conservative Party, including its electoral district associations, candidates, nomination contestants and leadership contestants, are subject to extensive regulation under that act, including in particular the public disclosure requirements for contributions over $200. As a result of these requirements, we collect personal information from donors and members when they contribute to our party or purchase a membership. You may also choose to provide us with personal information on a voluntary basis such as when registering for an event or signing a petition. We are required by law to keep records of donors for tax purposes.
    The information the Conservative Party gathers, either directly from Canadians or as a result of legislative requirements, is used for communication purposes. As a political party, we believe it is very important to communicate with Canadians on a regular basis. We are a national organization, but we have a riding-based membership system, so personal information may be disclosed to local riding associations, candidates, nomination contestants or leadership candidates for the purposes of communicating with those persons.
    There is some non-personal information that we track that is also included in our privacy policy for the additional information of Canadians. That non-personal information that may be collected through our website is collected through the use of web cookies with the purpose of informing the party about how people use our website in order to help us deliver better content for those users or to assist in general advertising efforts. We inform people in our policy about how to opt out of many of the advertising features used by sites like ours by adjusting their Google Ads settings or through free services like the Network Advertising Initiative's consumer opt-out page.
    To wrap up, the Conservative Party employs a variety of security systems to safeguard personal information from unauthorized access, disclosure or misuse, and from loss or unauthorized alteration. The Conservative Party does not and will not sell personal information.
    As I said in the opening, the commitment to protecting Canadians' privacy is important to us, and ensuring it's kept safe and secure is something we take great care in doing.
    If there are any questions on this policy, I'd be happy to take them.
    Thank you.

  (1105)  

    Thank you, Mr. Bailey.
    Next up is Mr. Fenrick for 10 minutes.
    Honourable members of the committee and Mr. Chair, it is a privilege to be able to speak with you today. I want to thank you for the opportunity for the Liberal Party of Canada to be heard on these important issues.
    My name is Michael Fenrick, and as I was introduced before, I serve as the legal and constitutional adviser to the national board of directors. That's a volunteer position. I'm also a riding chair for the riding in my home community of Parkdale—High Park, so I also have the experience of working for the party and volunteering for the party at a local level.
    Both from serving on our party's board and from working closely with grassroots volunteers, I know the party takes the protection of personal information extremely seriously. I also know how the responsible use of data can significantly increase participation and engagement in our political process.
    Today, I hope to speak to you about both of those priorities, and I look forward to answering your questions.
    First, I want to outline our most fundamental commitment on these matters. The Liberal Party of Canada works very hard both during and between elections to engage as many Canadians as possible in our democratic process. Protecting their personal information is a priority for the party in all of its interactions and operations.
    As part of that commitment, the Liberal Party of Canada has a clear and strict privacy policy in place, which is posted on all of the party's national websites, and it can always be publicly viewed at liberal.ca/privacy. The highest level of security is implemented for all data and records that are maintained by the party. The party does not sell any personal information. At all times the Liberal Party of Canada fully complies with all Elections Canada rules and regulations for political engagement and campaign activities as required by our campaign partners, who do the same.
    Why does all of this matter? Because secure and accurate data is very important to how modern political parties operate and engage with Canadians. Like all Canadian political parties, the Liberal Party uses data to engage with voters. Understanding the interests and the priorities of Canadians helps us to speak to the issues that matter most to them and in turn mobilizes democratic participation in our country.
    The importance of this objective truly can't be overstated. Political parties are not commercial businesses. We are not-for-profit voluntary associations defined in the Canada Elections Act as organizations whose fundamental purpose is to participate in public affairs by endorsing candidates for election. Our interests are very different from those of private sector entities to which federal privacy legislation applies. We promote candidates to Canadians. We're informed in part by information about eligible voters and in accordance with accepted privacy practices and safeguards, and we safeguard the information that Canadians entrust us with.

  (1110)  

    Using data to help engage voters isn't a bad thing; it's quite the opposite. It helps to ensure that political parties are in tune with what matters to the electorate and that more of us are involved in elections. For as long as there have been free and democratic elections, successful candidates have worked to build detailed lists of their supporters, to understand their priorities and return to them with an ask to help out at the polls.
    Knowing what interests have motivated voters and who supports our party helps us deliver relevant information and policy positions to Canadians. For example, we know that more and more people, and especially young people, are seeking out news and information online. For parties to be relevant, we need to have a strong online presence and interact with Canadians through the mediums and on the platforms they are using. That's why in recent years innovative engagement on social media, online advertising and email communications has become increasingly important to our operations.
    Where do we get the information we have about voters? Like the other registered political parties, we receive an electronic copy of the list of electors from Elections Canada each year. Under the Canada Elections Act, registered parties are authorized to use the lists to communicate with electors, including for the purposes of soliciting contributions and recruiting party members, in our case registered Liberals.
    For all parties, using personal information contained in the list of electors in an unauthorized manner is a criminal offence under the act. It is punishable by a fine and up to two years of imprisonment. We take our obligations in this regard very seriously.
    In addition, we work hard to identify, engage and mobilize potential supporters with phone calls, outreach events, door knocking, digital advertising, emails, petitions and more. Often we keep track of information about the issues that matter most to our supporters and to Canadians, and the information they express about whether they intend to vote for us. This information is recorded if it is volunteered by the individual voter and is used to inform the party's outreach efforts and political strategies at election time.
    On occasion, limited types of data are purchased by the party to help us reach out and connect with more supporters and Canadians. For example, in the past we have purchased widely available phone book-type information or Canada Post address validation lists.
    While we use social media to boost voter turnout, identify supporters through issues-based petitions and ask for fundraising support, the Liberal Party of Canada does not have access to specific Facebook accounts beyond those of our own social media channels.
    Our party's primary voter-contact database is a system called Liberalist. Certain individuals, including MPs, riding association executives, candidates and campaign managers may request access to Liberalist. They can view the voter information for electors in their ridings.
    Account holders are assigned certain levels of access based on our internal rules and policy, and must provide their name, email address, phone numbers, riding name and address. All account holders on Liberalist must agree to be bound by a Liberalist user agreement, which sets out the terms and conditions for using the system. A copy of that, I understand, is with the clerk.

  (1115)  

     Users must only use the data for the purpose of communication on behalf of the party with voters, donors and registered Liberals. They agree that they will not keep a copy of any of the data and will not share it with anyone else.
    Mr. Fenrick, you're about 15 seconds over. Are you just about at your conclusion?
     Yes.
    I will take one moment to wrap up.
    The Liberal Party of Canada also has a strict privacy policy in place. A copy has also been filed with the clerk of this committee. We think it is a best-in-class privacy policy for protecting the personal information of Canadians.
     We hope this committee will seriously entertain submissions of the Liberal Party of Canada about the importance of political engagement as a guiding factor when considering these important issues.
    Thank you.
    Thank you, Mr. Fenrick.
    Next up, from the New Democratic Party, we have Jesse Calvert.
    Go ahead, for 10 minutes.
     Hello and good morning, members of the committee. My name is Jesse Calvert and I'm the director of operations for Canada's New Democratic Party. I want to thank you for the invitation to appear before you to discuss our work with data and our privacy policies.
    The federal NDP and most of its provincial sections across the country all use software called Populus to interface with our respective databases of elector data, similar in principle to both the Conservative Party's constituent information management system and the Liberal Party's Liberalist. Of course, the NDP has a unique structure, wherein the federal party and the provincial sections share a formal affiliation with a common membership.
    While both the federal party and the provincial sections use Populus as a way to interface with their databases, the databases themselves are not shared. Information about electors is retained by the section collecting the data and each section uses the voters list from their respective elections agency, which is the permanent voters list produced by Elections Canada in our case, as the backbone of their own database.
    With regard to membership lists, this information is handled by a single point of contact at the federal party and counterparts in the provincial sections. Each instance of Populus is separate from each other.
    Populus is a web application developed by a third party contractor. This same company also developed foreAction, which is used by NDP caucus members and staff to track constituent case work. These programs are totally separate. They do not speak to each other and party staff, like myself, have no access to the case work database.
    In terms of the data that we collect, like other parties, we use the Elections Canada permanent voters list, our own membership and donation lists, contact information from petitions, public data, such as from the census, and data collected as a result of direct outreach operations. We only use this data in accordance with our needs as a registered political party, and we do not give it to third parties, as a matter of policy.
    We do not use any kind of psychographic modelling. Any modelling or analytics we do is based on publicly available statistical information and not personal private information. Nothing we use for these kinds of analytical purposes is more specific than, say, polling data or census information.
    We understand that privacy is a serious concern and we strive to abide by the principles of PIPEDA. We have a designated privacy officer at the federal NDP, and recently put into place an updated privacy policy, which can be viewed at NDP.ca/privacy.
    Here are some examples of how the party protects Canadians' privacy.
    Every user of Populus must agree to terms of use before they are able to access the NDP database. Internally, we have secure protocols that govern who can access our data, what they can access and when they can access it. We abide by a principle of minimal access and only give users access to data that is relevant to their needs. For example, organizers in a given riding only have access to data in that riding. We offer electors the option to unsubscribe in every communication we have with them and we have internal security protocols to ensure that, in the event of a data breach, subjects are notified promptly.
    We are in the process of moving our data into the cloud using the same provider that the Communications Security Establishment uses for unclassified data. One gap between our practice and PIPEDA that is currently in place is that we are unable to provide Canadians with their data upon request and give them the ability to correct it. This is mostly due to a lack of a security protocol to verify the identity of individuals requesting their data. We are giving this problem a lot of thought to determine how to address it properly.

  (1120)  

     In solving one problem, we do not wish to create another one. It's for that reason that we support a legislative change that would give Canadians the right to request their data and to extend the PIPEDA coverage to political parties, as is already the case in British Columbia through their legislation, PIPA. We need a consistent set of clear rules on privacy and personal data that all parties can abide by.
    Thank you again for the invitation. I look forward to your questions.
    Thank you, Mr. Calvert.
    We'll start off with Mr. Saini for seven minutes.
    Thank you very much to all three of you for being here this morning. I'm going to start off with a general question first.
    What protections are in place to keep the data you hold on Canadians safe? We can start with Mr. Bailey, and go that way.
    Certainly. Thank you, Mr. Chair.
    There are really two elements to protecting the data. There is protecting against unauthorized access. We're talking about data breaches and attacks on our systems. That's obviously a continuing effort for us. We have a great team on that. That's not my expertise, but I do know that we have a very good data team in place. We test our systems constantly. We host in a very secure manner. We try to secure against any and all attacks. That's one side—the unauthorized access.
    The other side, of course, is authorized access but inappropriate use. That would be where someone who has access in a limited capacity to the database would access information and use it in a way they were not authorized to do. We have significant policies and processes in place to minimize the impact or the opportunity for someone to do such a thing.
    First and foremost is obviously limiting access to that data, so that, as my colleagues have mentioned, only people who have a need to access it have the opportunity to do so. Any of the information they do access is logged, and they are required to provide the reason for this access. If and when it's used in an inappropriate manner, we have methods, both internally and, if necessary, with the relevant authorities to.... We would co-operate fully with any investigation if there were any breach of our privacy policy or, of course, any loss.
    There are two elements to it. As far as protecting our data, we have a great IT team for that. Our data security is a continuing matter. I was just talking this morning about some of the firewall protections that we're updating. The other side, which is where people have the key but want to use it in an inappropriate manner, is primarily where our policies come into play. Certainly, the procedure is that we limit the breadth of access to data that any one user can have at one time.

  (1125)  

    For our part, many of the same things that Mr. Bailey has spoken to apply equally with respect to the Liberal Party and its treatment of personal information. From the perspective of somebody outside the system gaining access, we regularly run training. We've developed a cybersecurity policy, and we regularly run training at all levels of the organization, in terms of trying to ensure that people are educated about how to avoid things like phishing scams, spoof email addresses and matters along those lines.
    In addition to that, the Liberal Party's national director and the team at the head office here in Ottawa have met with the CSE in order to discuss best practices on how to secure Canadians' information. That includes using cloud-based email servers, which is what is recommended by the CSE. That has been implemented.
    On the access by users who have been granted access, who are volunteers, there are a number of ways in which we protect that information. Probably the most important, though, is that it's a segmented database. You're only given access to the information on Liberalist that you need. That can be as little as a single poll or, in the case of somebody who is running a canvass, in fact, it could just be the canvass information for a particular block or two of a neighbourhood. Riding association presidents may have access to the entire riding. Very few people within the Liberal Party have access to the entire list of electors. Our database is segmented in order to ensure that only the access that you've been granted and that you need is given to you.
     Unsurprisingly, much of what my colleagues have just said applies also to the New Democratic Party. We have a varying degrees of access protocol to ensure that folks who have access to the database only have access to the information that they require to do their tasks, and only a very small number of IT professionals have full access to the information.
    We also have a terms of use policy that all users are required to read and understand and consent to before they are given access to their particular segment of the database. Also, as I mentioned in my opening statement, we are in the process of moving our database and our systems into the cloud, which will increase our ability to secure the information that is contained within it.
    In terms of guarding against security breaches, we have a number of internal security protocols that are constantly under review and being developed and improved upon. We have ongoing threat monitoring to ensure that if a breach were to take place, we would be able to respond quickly, swiftly. We have protocols for notification, if such a situation were ever to arise to ensure that the folks whose information might have been compromised are informed of that situation.
    This is my last question. Obviously you can appreciate there is a difference between a political organization and a private sector organization, and the collection of data that each one uses for its own purpose. In one regard, you're talking about a political entity that is using the data in the pursuit of democracy, and in the other, in a private sector organization, you're using that in the pursuit of profit.
    Do you think the rules should remain the same or be subject to the same standards, or should there be a difference between political parties and private sector organizations?

  (1130)  

    I could start off on that one.
    You're absolutely right. They are separate. They are different. We currently operate under a different legislative situation, with PIPEDA coverage for private companies and not covering us as political parties.
    My role with the party is to enforce our privacy policy as written, and currently it does not come up to full PIPEDA compliance, which I believe might be the suggestion there. We certainly cover all our legal requirements and we follow everything as laid out in the privacy policy, but the decision as to whether or not we should implement or change the legislative background that covers us as political parties, I leave to Parliament and to you, as a committee. We're here to enforce the rules as written, and if there's a new rule basis that comes in and takes effect for how we need to operate, then we would certainly come into compliance.
    I don't have an opinion as to whether it would be required or not.
    Thank you, Mr. Bailey, and Mr. Saini.
    Next up, for seven minutes, we have Mr. Kent.
    Thank you very much, Chair. My apologies for my tardy arrival.
    Thanks to all of you for coming today. It is much appreciated, and there is a very important discussion that we can have here today.
    In June, after four months of study of what began as the Cambridge Analytica-Facebook-AggregateIQ scandal, the committee, among a number of recommendations to government in our interim report, recommended that political activities come under the authority of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada. Mr. Calvert, you've already spoken to that.
    As Mr. Saini pointed out indirectly, an awful lot of the testimony that we heard with regard to the Brexit referendum and interference, or attempted interference in the American political elections at different levels had to do with third party intervention. I'm wondering if each of you could comment—and Mr. Calvert a little more explicitly—as to whether or not each of your parties believes that extending the authority of the Privacy Commissioner to protect Canadians' privacy in the political sphere, as they are protected in the commercial sphere, would raise any objections with your respective parties.
    We'll have Mr. Bailey first.
    Once again, as you mentioned, there was a lot of concern around third parties and their involvement. We certainly share that concern, and we want to make sure we have fair elections in this country, obviously. We play a large part in that, and we want to continue to be able to participate in the democratic process as fully as we possibly can.
    That being said, as for whether there should be oversight by the Privacy Commissioner or enforcement of PIPEDA across political parties, once again I would leave that to Parliament to make that decision. My role as director of membership and privacy officer is to protect our lists, to make sure we take good care of them and to make sure everyone is treated fairly and evenly.
    If anything above and beyond that came from Parliament, we would certainly come into compliance. As for whether we should, once again, I would leave that up to Parliament.
     From the Liberal Party of Canada's perspective, obviously it's a critical issue that we need to address in terms of third parties. I've already outlined some of the ways in which we are trying to both address those issues and constantly improve on them within the Liberal Party.
    On the issue, more broadly, of PIPEDA's application to political parties, I think we would hope that one of the serious considerations that this committee would take under advisement is the fundamental difference—I would say, founded in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms—between political participation or engagement and commercial activity. Our courts have recognized that in a number of places, including in protection of freedom of speech, etc.
    If we are going to develop rules, we need to develop rules that work for all people who participate in the political process in this country. I say that from the perspective of a party that had approximately 80,000 volunteers, I think, in the last election. We need rules that work for the volunteer who's an 18-year-old, just got interested in politics, belongs to a campus club and is signing up his friends, all the way to more sophisticated people who have worked on a variety of campaigns.
    From our perspective, whatever rules are developed need to recognize that fundamental reality, that political parties are voluntary associations of volunteers, fundamentally, and that there are hundreds, if not thousands, of volunteers to every paid staff member. It would be a real disincentive to participation in the political process if people could face the kinds of penalties that exist for corporations, for instance, for non-compliance under PIPEDA. It would actually have a chilling effect, I believe, on our political process to do so.

  (1135)  

    The New Democratic Party seriously believes that Canadians deserve to have trust in their democracy and to have trust in their political parties. We think that the only way to increase this trust and to increase transparency is to ensure that, first, all political parties are playing by the same rules, and second, there is the ability for oversight into the way the internal policies of the party are applied. It's for that reason that we have been calling, again and again, for the inclusion of political parties within the PIPEDA framework.
    I do agree that there are differences between the way political parties do their work and the way other types of organizations do their work, and certainly there should be thought and consultation when moving toward a framework, but we are very clear. We do think parties should be included in PIPEDA. We do hope the government moves toward that goal. We believe that will increase the trust Canadians can have in the security of their information and their trust in their democratic process.
    Thank you.
    Each of you has said that your party does not sell or distribute political data beyond the party. I ask each of you to simply acknowledge whether your party buys data from data brokers.
     I'll start off once again. Thank you.
    We have a very similar process to that laid out by my colleague Mr. Fenrick. We receive our data from four main sources. We're very up front about all of these.
    The primary one we don't purchase. It's provided to us as part of the electors list from Elections Canada. That is 90% of our data. It is the information about who is an eligible voter. That makes up the lion's share of what we have in our system.
    We do purchase data from two sources. One is InfoCanada. It's basically the white pages. We buy the phone book, so we get some phone numbers to match up with those constituents who we get from the list of electors. The second one we purchase from is Canada Post's change of address list, so that our lists are as up-to-date as possible, because that is issued more frequently than the list of electors. We try to reconcile those two. That is it. We don't purchase from any other source.
    The fourth source of data, I think we should make clear, is that which is provided voluntarily, primarily by our supporters, but sometimes by our non-supporters, when they make a contribution, show up at an event, purchase a membership, or if they were to contact us and indicate their support one way or another, or answer a phone call, survey or something of that nature. The only place we purchase data, to be very clear, is InfoCanada, which is the white pages, and—
    We're out of time, but Mr. Fenrick and Mr. Calvert, would you like to follow through with a quick answer?
     The Liberal Party of Canada is very consistent with what my friend from the Conservative Party just said. Mainly things like phone book information and Canada Post information are examples. Much of this, for instance, Canada Post information, is purchased in large part in order to validate donors and ensure that we are compliant with our obligations under the elections act when we're accepting donations. There are a lot of reasons that we buy. It's not just to communicate, but that is an important part of it, obviously.
    Mr. Calvert, quickly....
    I think generally the same would be said for the New Democratic Party. We also want to ensure that the data we have with respect to address and mailing information is as up-to-date as possible, and we purchase information from Canada Post to make sure that's the case.

  (1140)  

    Thank you.
    Next up, we have Mr. Angus for seven minutes.
    Thank you, Mr. Chair.
    Thank you, gentlemen, for coming. On behalf of the New Democratic Party, with my colleagues here, I ask that you don't target us individually for dragging your parties' representatives into the light of day. We're just doing our job here.
     Mr. Fenrick, in 2012-13, leading up to the 2015 election, it was common wisdom, heard on the radio and media, that the Conservatives were really good at micro-targeting. New Democrats weren't so bad at it, but we were really trying to pick up our game. Liberals didn't really micro-target. They did one-inch wide advertising across the country. It was seen that this would be a problem for the Liberals in 2015. Then the election came, and you guys stomped us. Your micro-targeting was really good.
    How did that transformation happen? Who oversaw the creation of a very impressive Liberal data machine for 2015?
     That's not something I can speak to directly, but I would be happy to give whatever information I can to the committee at a—
    That's our leader calling. He didn't like that question.
    Voices: Oh, oh!
    Mr. Charlie Angus: He wants me to ask it again. Sorry.
     My answer, Mr. Angus, is simply that I don't have that information available to me right now, but I'd be happy to identify that information for you at a future point.
    Okay.
    For the next election, it appears that your party will be working with Tom Pitfield and Data Sciences. He did work on the 2015.... What will the relationship be between Data Sciences and the Liberal Party, in terms of a digital strategy?
     I can speak generally. In terms of our involvement with any third party provider, we ensure that those third party providers are bound by privacy obligations similar to the ones we impose upon ourselves. We include, in agreements with third party providers, that their use of the data is similarly restricted in order to protect the privacy interests of the data holder or the personal information of those individuals.
    Mr. Pitfield was pretty impressive in 2015. Is that why you're working with Data Sciences? Is it because of their expertise in doing this kind of electoral data running?
     I don't think I'm the appropriate person to answer that question.
    Okay.
    Mr. Bailey, one of the things we talked about this morning was protocols and limits to accessing databases. In 2011, when we had the Pierre Poutine scandal, apparently a young staffer was able to make calls based on the Conservative CIMS database.
    How was it possible that someone, a young volunteer, was able to have access to the databases if we have protocols in place to limit access so that abuse doesn't happen?
    In 2011, the situation as described was in one riding. It was in the riding of Guelph. The young individual you identified was a member of the campaign in Guelph. He was a member of that team and thus did have access to the database for the region for which he was responsible, which was Guelph. The use of that data, particularly drawing non-supporter information with the purpose of deceiving those voters, was certainly a breach of privacy policy both then and now, as well as of Elections Canada law and significant laws.
    We certainly were not pleased with that, and that is one of the reasons we now have a league-leading privacy policy. We have changed not only the policy. It's not just putting words to it. The ability to access data has changed significantly since that time, and I'm very confident in the processes we now have in place. The system at the time limited his access to only the region for which he had responsibility. That was one of the key limits at the time, but his access was approved by the campaign at that time, which was one of the checks against access.
    It was a breach of our policy and a breach of Elections Canada law. We have evolved as an organization because of it, not just with respect to our policies but certainly with our procedures and the ability to access data. It has changed since 2011.

  (1145)  

    Thank you.
    Mr. Calvert, part of the reason we have undertaken this study is the Cambridge Analytica scandal. It's not just a question of political parties having data, but to be able to micro-target the issue of manipulating voters online.
    The question that's come up time and time again involves data points that are collected by parties, the psychographic modelling. Does the New Democratic Party have an identified number of points of information it would like per potential voter to know whether they're in our universe? How do you target voters? Are you using psychographic modelling or statistical modelling to identify where potential voters or non-voters are?
    Like all parties, we're trying to talk to the people who are most likely to care about the issues we care about. We're trying to identify the groups of people who are most interested in the issues we stand up and fight for every day. We use publicly available data to do this, but the data and information we use is not personal information. It's not personally identifiable information. It's information that's publicly available and speaks to trends and groups of individuals.
    In the end, the goal of a political party is to engage Canadians in conversations, to learn more about them by asking good questions and to improve upon our policies by listening to those answers. That's what we try to do on a day-to-day basis, whether through our online outreach or through our door-to-door outreach. That's our mindset going into it.
    Thank you.
    Thank you, Mr. Angus.
    Next up, for seven minutes, is Mr. Baylis.
    Mr. Calvert, you said the NDP would be happy to be subject to PIPEDA laws.
    Mr. Bailey, would the Conservative Party be happy to be subject to PIPEDA laws?
    Once again, I'll leave it up to Parliament and your committee to make a recommendation on that. My role with the party is to protect our lists and to follow our policies. I think we have a very good, leading privacy policy, but as for whether it should be in place, I leave that—
    Mr. Fenrick, do you have a position on that?
    Certainly not as PIPEDA currently stands.... It just doesn't make sense in the particular context in which political activities are—
     You feel that the penalties are too heavy. Do they compare to B.C.? In B.C., there hasn't been a great drop off—at least, I'm not aware of it—of volunteers because they are subject to the B.C. privacy laws. However, you think that PIPEDA laws are more strict than the B.C. laws. Is that your concern?
     I don't know the B.C. law in any sort of detail, but I do believe that the way that the penalties operate will be a disincentive to people's participating if PIPEDA were to be applied.
    However, I think it's important to have the complete context before making that decision.
    Okay, but the penalties are what you're saying might worry volunteers. That is what is bothering you about PIPEDA.
    Absolutely, and it's also just not well-tailored to the political context where you're dealing with a mostly volunteer organization.
    Whether you're subject to PIPEDA or some other laws, let's say we're talking about the parameters of use. You have this database. For example, should you be able to commercialize a database? Do you have any thoughts on that?
    You've collected a ton of data. People are making money all over the place.
    I'll start with you, Mr. Calvert.
    I would say absolutely not.
    Absolutely not.
    I would say the same, yes. We have no—
    How about this? I have charities and charities often swap data. They say, “We have this pool of donors, and if you tell us your pool of donors, we'll tell you our pool of donors.” Now you're not making money from your database, but you have a very valuable database and someone else may have a valuable database, not your competitors but some other company. Should you be able to trade that data, giving them some of your data and getting some of their data so that, together, you've built a stronger database?
    I think that Canadians expect that the information that we receive from Elections Canada and gather through our outreach efforts will be protected and kept within our database, so I think that's probably not something that we would find effective, efficient or correct.

  (1150)  

    You should not be allowed to share it, not for commercial benefit and not even for sharing to gather other data, like swapping data.
    I think that raises some serious questions, and if put on the spot, I would say probably not.
    Mr. Fenrick.
    I'm not sure that I have an answer for you other than the more general answer, which is that we don't do it. We certainly don't share our information.
    You don't do it because you don't do it, but theoretically some fourth person from a fourth party could do it, and we're now trying to figure out the parameters of use.
    Do you think we should allow you to do it or not?
    I'm not sure that I have a position on that, but I'd be happy to get back to you.
    Okay.
    As covered by our privacy policy, we collect it for the purpose of electioneering, for running a campaign, for contacting them for the purposes of winning an election. What you're describing doesn't fit with our policy, so no.
    It doesn't fit with your policy in what way?
    In that it would be using our data that we have collected for a purpose other than getting us votes in the next election.
    Right now you're writing the rules for yourselves. I believe we should write the rules for you.
    Right.
    I'm asking you the question in this light, and I'd like an answer now. Do you think we should allow you to do that, yes or no?
    As I said before, if that's your decision as a governing Parliament—
    But you're also saying that the Conservative Party doesn't do that—
    Correct.
    —and that you'd be comfortable with a law that doesn't allow you to share that data.
    That would be in line with our policy, so yes.
    Okay.
    Mr. Baylis, I'd just like to interject with one more point. Of course, the list of electors that we receive is subject to the Canada Elections Act, and that's the primary point, I think, for all three parties in terms of the information that we collect. There are penalties, quite steep and serious penalties, for using that information right now.
    That's the list of electors that you've collected. I understood that. However, then you've added stuff through your door knocking and through your phone calls—that this person likes pizza and that person likes hamburgers—that helps you to sell them your political views. That's the data that I'm talking about. You're saying that you'd be comfortable if we did not allow you to share the data that you're collecting.
    As I said, I think that's a good suggestion, and if it fits with our policy, yes.
    Mr. Fenrick, do you have thoughts on that?
    I don't actually have a position on that right now.
    Okay.
    I want to follow up on what Mr. Angus was asking about: micro-targeting. Right now we might collect people's religious leanings, people's ethnicities, what languages they speak and things of that nature. Do you see a limit to how far we should allow political parties to go?
    If we pick up, for example, that a person is part of a hate group or a person has some sorts of views that are not acceptable in general society, you might be able to use that view. We see this in politics, so it's not hypothetical. We see this and it's used to push them a certain way. That's part of what we found out in this study and in other places.
    How should we have parameters of what we should and should not allow you to do and collect? Is there anything that we should not allow you to collect?
     The information we collect about individuals is the information that they give us, and that seems like a good place to start....
    Okay, if someone says, “I hate this ethnic group”, are you going to collect that data?
    By hearing it, we would have it. That's certainly not information that's—
    The person who heard it heard it, but did you put it in your database as a data point?
    I don't think so. I don't think we would be interested in that.
    Then you didn't collect it. I'm asking you whether we should put parameters around what you can and cannot collect.
    I actually haven't thought too much about that question. I think it's a good question. We might be able to get back to you on more specifics about how—
    Does your code of conduct, code of ethics, have any limits on that?
    I'd have to look into it. I don't believe so.
    Thank you, Mr. Baylis.
    Next up for five minutes we have Monsieur Gourde.

[Translation]

    Thank you, Mr. Chair.
    I'd like to thank the witnesses for being here this morning.
    I have no doubt as to the sincerity of your remarks today. From my 30 or so years in politics, I can tell you that, even though we are now living in the computer age, we've learned absolutely nothing. Forty years ago, I was working with people who were 50 and 60 years old at the time and who had been in the field for 40 years. When election time came around, there were lists of electors with people's phone numbers, and they were the right phone numbers. Back then, it was easy. Everyone had phone books and they were very thick. When we received the list of electors with people's names and addresses, we could look them up in the phone book. In many cases, a single household would have four, five or six voters, all with the same telephone number. That's no longer the case today.
    Unfortunately, the number of land lines has dropped significantly every single year since I entered federal politics, and this will be my fifth election. Today, only 30% to 40% of people have land lines. All the rest of voters have cell phones. We don't have access to cell phone numbers, making it increasingly difficult to reach all voters. One riding can have 90,000 voters. We can knock on 10,000 doors, but let's not kid ourselves, we also have to spend time reaching out to people by phone.
    Nowadays, we hear a lot about profiling. We assume people vote a certain way because they have certain views, but we can't just call them on the phone. We assume they think a certain way and we use social networks like Facebook to reach those people because we can't talk to them otherwise.
    Do you think we should be allowed access to the cell phone numbers of people on the list of electors? It's fairly easy to get the phone numbers of people with land lines, but we can't get cell phone numbers, and the issue is only going to get worse. Is that something we should ask for, as lawmakers?
    My question is for all three of you.

  (1155)  

[English]

    We'll start off with Mr. Calvert.
    I'm sorry, you're asking whether we think that political parties should be given cellphone numbers through, say, the permanent electors list that Elections Canada generates. Is that your question?

[Translation]

    Yes, that's what I was asking.
    We can get people's land line numbers from online directories—since actual phone books have all but disappeared—but cell phone numbers are considered confidential and we don't have access to them. Not being able to communicate with voters is problematic in many ways, and it's getting worse every year. As people die, the proportion of land lines drops between 1% and 5% a year. Young people own only cell phones. In 15 years, just 20% of the population will be accessible to us by phone.
    Should we raise the red flag to say that it's time to do something about this situation? It's a genuine problem, after all.

[English]

    Thank you for the clarification.
    I think that society continues to change and technology continues to change, and the way we do things has to also continue to change. The goal of a political party, or at least our political party, the New Democratic Party, is to engage Canadians in meaningful conversations. Anything that, say, Elections Canada was able to provide to us to allow us to do a better job at that, we would generally be supportive of.
     On behalf of the Liberal Party of Canada as well, part of the reason that we were excited to have this opportunity today was to discuss how it is not just that we're going to protect Canadians' privacy, which is obviously of critical importance, but also how we are going to meaningfully engage Canadians in the 21st century in order to have those discussions. I'm not sure of the logistics around the particular cellphone issue, but I am aware of the statistics that you have cited to the committee here today.
    I do think it's of concern that it is more difficult every year for political parties to actually have discussions, not just with their supporters but with all Canadians, in order to provide an opportunity to actually understand what the electorate is looking for, which is why I think all of the committee members are in this business.
    We're actually out of time so just a brief response, maybe 10 seconds or less, if you can.
    You described the situation very well.
    It's more access to data for us that can be provided to us legislatively by Elections Canada. We put a lot of effort into acquiring that information, so if it can be provided to us we would welcome it.

  (1200)  

    Thank you, Mr. Gourde.
    Next up for five minutes is Mr. Picard.
    First of all, the exercise you're doing will hopefully put trust back in our population, not just us. Our job is quite a victim of cynicism, but we need ways to make sure that people can trust our institution, if that's the exercise you're fulfilling.
    My concern is about working with third parties. Do you sell your data to third parties?
    Absolutely not.
    Absolutely not.
    Absolutely not.
    Okay.
    Do you rent your data to third parties?
    Absolutely not.
    Absolutely not.
    Absolutely not.
    Are you saying all the data we're working on in each of your respective organizations stays within the organization and any third parties that may want to access the data.... How do they proceed if they want to access your data? With research centres, academics and foundations that are supportive of your lines of policy, how do you manage dealing with third parties, then?
    We certainly are approached by third parties for that sort of thing from time to time. Our specific policy covers sharing, for our purposes, federally, as well as the local campaign level nominees. We recently had a leadership race and they were covered by that as well. Those are the only separate organizations—and of course they fall under the umbrella of the Conservative Party of Canada—that we share our information with.
    Other than sharing within the party itself with our provincial and territorial boards, not the provincial party, the Ontario Liberal Party, or what have you, but our provincial territorial boards, which are part of our national organization, and at the riding level, we don't share our information with anyone.
    The only exception to that would be in circumstances where we have engaged a third party supplier. In those circumstances we ensure that there are contractual provisions in place in order to protect the use of that data. It's not selling it. It's not renting it. It's using it in order to engage Canadians through a phone bank, or what have you, in order to communicate with them.
    We also do not sell, rent or share our data with third party organizations. From time to time we contract with third party providers to do the work of the registered political party. We ensure that the contracts that we have with them include strict contractual obligations to protect the confidentiality of the information that they might have access to and that they agree to fall under any of the privacy provisions that folks working within the party also have to fall under.
    But the possibility remains that when we work with third parties as soon as they have their hands on data for the purpose of the agreement they have with you, we tend to lose control over what they do with the data, or is that...?
    At least for us the protocols in place when that happens are very strict.
    If a third party contractor requires information of ours to do the job that we contracted them to do, they might have access on a read-only basis but they don't have the ability to, say, download the information, copy the information or take it off premises. Certainly, we think long and hard before we engage someone from the outside to help us with our work. Once we do make that decision, we ensure that strict policies are in place and that legal and contractual obligations are instituted before anything happens.
     By the way, in your presentation, you mentioned that you created your system or updated your system recently. What was the upgrade about? Was it about policies or data protection, and what triggered that?
    We are in the process of moving our IT systems to the cloud. We're moving away from the holding of information on the premises and moving it into the cloud. I'm not an IT professional, so I can't get into the specifics, but it's my understanding that, here in the 21st century, it is standard practice to increase security and increase a whole bunch of other operational abilities, one of them being the security of the data. That's the process that's ongoing right now.

  (1205)  

    I feel generous. I'll leave you my last five seconds.
    Thank you.
    You're next up for five minutes, Mr. Kent.
    Thank you, Chair.
    During the study of the Cambridge Analytica-Facebook-AggregateIQ scandal, we have heard repeated recommendations from academics, from IT experts and from social media security experts that, on the basis of what happened in the Brexit referendum, where confected third parties controlled and targeted advertising buys on social media—and the same thing in the United States—there was a common recommendation that a political registry of advertising buys be set up so that one could see transparently what ads were purchased by the political parties or by third parties and how they were targeted.
    I wonder if each of you could comment on what your party position might be towards that sort of registry, to show how your advertising buys in the writ period or perhaps even the pre-writ period of a campaign would be applied.
    We can start on that, if that's all right.
    Absolutely. We share the same concerns about third party involvement in the election—this past election and those upcoming. If there were to be some increased requirement for us to fully register all ad purchases across all channels so that they could be investigated on an individual level.... Of course, we are required to list all election expenses and we are currently complying with that requirement, but if what is required to clean up the election is to get to the individualized level, then I think that's something that we would be in favour of if it comes forward from Parliament.
    Mr. Fenrick.
    As well, obviously, Canadians have the right to expect an election that's not interfered with by third parties. If that is a measure that goes some way towards addressing those concerns, then it would be one that certainly should be considered.
    As I understand it—and I may be mistaken because I appreciate that all of you are much more expert in this issue than I am—if Bill C-76 is passed into law, it will contain some measures with respect to Facebook ads and other matters. Many of these issues may be addressed by that legislation, and we welcome that.
    I think that generally the New Democratic Party has and will continue to stand up for more open and more transparent elections. As I've said, we do think that a political party should be brought into the PIPEDA framework, and I think that any measure that increases transparency increases the confidence that Canadians have that political parties are all playing by the same rules.
    One of the loopholes that wasn't addressed or is not being addressed by Bill C-76 is the fact that charitable American dollars that might have a political objective in determining, supporting or affecting a Canadian election can be effectively converted into Canadian dollars by being transferred from that American charitable group to the Canadian charity, which can then distribute them to third parties to be used in election campaigns. The witness who most effectively made this point, Vivian Krause said that it's easy for any individual political party to say that they take the high road in a political campaign if a third party is throwing the mud and making the political accusations on the campaign trail.
    I wonder if any of your parties would encourage the government to more effectively enable the CRA to respond to Elections Canada's unknowns about how these foreign charitable dollars are getting into the Canadian election process.
    I'll get started on that one, if that's okay.
    There are a couple of things. Other than working with Elections Canada on Bill C-76 consultation and any ongoing consultation on this matter, that's a bit outside my purview as privacy officer and membership chair. I'm not sure I can speak for the party on that particular issue other than, obviously, we want to make sure we have fair elections going forward.

  (1210)  

     That's outside my purview as well. However, I can say quite strongly that obviously the Liberal Party is concerned about foreign money and its potential influence on our election.
    Other than that, I don't think I can comment on that specific legislative suggestion.
    New Democrats are certainly concerned about foreign influence, whether it be monetary or otherwise. As I've said again and again, transparency is good. We believe in transparency and we think it increases the confidence of all Canadians in the democratic process.
    Without knowing the details of that specific recommendation, in general, transparency when it comes to elections is a good thing.
    Thank you, Mr. Kent and everybody.
    Next up is Madame Fortier for five minutes.

[Translation]

    Thank you, Mr. Chair.
    This morning, I realized that I had been a party volunteer for 25 years. It's worth noting that 25 years ago, we weren't talking about these rules, policies or codes of conduct. We are talking about them today, though. Protecting Canadians' information and making sure protocols are in place is important. I'd like to ask a few questions about what's happening on the ground. I think political parties have put codes of conduct in place, but I'd like to know what's actually happening on the ground.
    How can parties make sure volunteers know about these policies, for instance, within the Federal Liberal Riding Association of Ottawa-Vanier? Can you tell us how you make sure that the people working on the ground understand the importance of protecting Canadians' personal information?
    Mr. Bailey, you can go first. Please keep your answer brief.

[English]

    Absolutely, that's a great question.
    We take it very seriously that we train our local volunteers. You're right; there are several levels of volunteers that exist, by their level of involvement. Mr. Fenrick mentioned earlier that it would be very difficult to impose stiff penalties upon someone at a lower level, so that works in a couple of different ways. One is that you need to provide them training and only provide them access to what they should have access to.
    Most of our volunteers don't have access to any data. They should know that we'd have privacy policies and that they are covered by them because they are an extension of us during that time, but we need to limit the access to only those who truly need it. That comes from training at the local level. It comes from training of campaign managers. It comes from properly vetting all access so that we can effectively start up a campaign quickly and be compliant with any and all regulations.

[Translation]

    Mr. Fenrick, would you like to answer the question?

[English]

     Training is huge and key at all levels of the volunteer chain, including at the very basic level where people are out canvassing and have information. Obviously, limiting access as well, so people only have access to the information they need is important, and in addition to that, where people do have access, ensuring that there are protections in place.
    We have our Liberalist user agreement, where anybody who has access to it is bound by it and has agreed to ensure to hold that information and to return it at the end of their use so that they actually don't maintain any of that information. They're reminded of those obligations from the very moment they begin to have any access to it.

[Translation]

    Mr. Calvert, would you like to answer as well?

[English]

    Training is top on the list, and continued reinforcement of the importance of not just reading but understanding the protocols that are in place when they're given access or given a piece of information. It's why, if you are granted access to a Populus instance, where you might have access to a segment of information, you actually have to log on and read through the terms of use and take an affirmative step by saying, yes, you agree to this, and clicking the button. We try to write those in the clearest possible terms. That's why we have a privacy officer, not just to hear complaints but also to be a point of contact for individuals throughout our organization to ask questions.
    You're absolutely right. Things have continued to change over the last 25 years. Certainly my generation, the younger generation, is very aware of the new world we're living in, so it's important for us to provide a point of contact for people throughout the organization to ask the questions they have.

  (1215)  

[Translation]

    I'm going to stay on the topic of privacy protection.
    We talked about third parties. Specifically, how do your parties protect against the inadvertent or unauthorized disclosure of data to third parties, as far as volunteers and staff members go? How do you monitor that? How do you evaluate that?

[English]

    Once again, I'll jump in first.
    Absolutely, sharing information with third parties is of significant concern. As I mentioned, the security of our data is split into the two methods: protecting the data, and protecting against unauthorized access. It is evolving, but we certainly have an organization and leading privacy policy, which I haven't mentioned explicitly, and they do sign those agreements.
    We start anywhere from, as the first step, simply cutting off access and then investigating it, to issuing cease and desists both to the individuals who have drawn the information and anyone who we believe has access to it. In terms of legal involvement, our legal team will get involved quickly if we feel that it has been used.
    It's requested, and in fact demanded, that they destroy any copies of data if it came from our source and was used inappropriately. Then, of course, with any type of authorities that we need to go to further, if there are other rules or laws that have been broken, particularly Elections Canada laws, which are pretty broad on this topic, we co-operate with any and all investigations. Our data is our most valuable asset.
    My time is up, but if ever you could share your information....
    Could we get brief answers from Mr. Calvert or Mr. Fenrick?
     Sorry, did I understand the question correctly? Is it about inadvertent disclosure? Is that the issue?
     The Liberal Party of Canada regularly does training with its staff in order to address issues along the lines of when you get spoof emails and phishing scams. We regularly get involved in those sorts of security processes to ensure that the information is not disclosed.
    The second piece just comes back to the segmented database we use, which is not simply to provide limited scopes of access to users. The database itself is segmented such that it is a more secure way of proceeding, such that information can only be accessed in tranches, rather than the complete information.
    Mr. Calvert, it has to be a much quicker answer than that, if you can.
    We protect it through limiting access, ongoing threat monitoring and extensive training.
    Well done.
    Mr. Cullen, you're last up. Welcome back. You have three minutes.
    Jesse, are you sure you're a New Democrat? That was awfully concise.
    Let's try for concision in this little speed round.
    Thank you for being here. It's fair to say that in order for your parties to be effective, you need to be able to communicate with voters, and in order to do that effectively, you need to understand voters at an individual level. Each party collects information on individual Canadians in terms of voting intention, where they live and voter ID. Is that correct?
     Correct.
    I was just establishing that.
    That has increased over time, in terms of the wealth, depth and breadth of the information that each of the parties holds about individual Canadians. Is that also true? Compared to 20 or 30 years ago, is it fair to say that what we know about individual voters has increased significantly?
    In terms of quicker and more response time, online contacts....
    In terms of online contacts and social media, is that fair to say?
    Okay.
    Last June, this committee passed a decision that the parties should fall under privacy laws, PIPEDA specifically. Do you support that recommendation?
    I'll start with our Conservative friend.
    As I mentioned a couple of times earlier in this room, I would leave that to Parliament. As the party, we would enforce whatever rules are placed upon us to make sure we're compliant.
    Would you be able to enforce such a rule?
    It would require significant consultation and development or redesign of our processes, but—
    You could do it.
    —if it was brought into law, we would certainly continue to exist as a party.
    Mr. Fenrick.
     We would not support the application of PIPEDA en masse and en bloc to political parties in the sense that, as it's currently drafted, it's intended to address commercial activity. It's not intended to address political activity.
    Right now, we have no laws governing privacy in political parties. As it was described by the Privacy Commissioner, it's the wild west.
    According to the Chief Electoral Officer, Bill C-76, which you referenced earlier, has nothing of substance in it when it comes to privacy. The status quo will continue, which is that none of you are under any legal obligations when it comes to privacy as pertains to the federal laws. Is that right?
     As it currently stands, there may be certain situations, but I don't think I can speak to that issue directly. What I can say is that PIPEDA, as it currently stands, is not an appropriate tool for managing political parties and political engagement in this country.

  (1220)  

     That's interesting because we even recommended one step down from PIPEDA, and your representatives from your party rejected that as well. The status quo is nothing. The Chief Electoral Officer and the Privacy Commissioner have all recommended that we have something. What's the New Democrats' position on this?
    As I've said a number of times in this proceeding, we have said as a party before, and will continue to say, that we thoroughly believe that all political parties should be playing by the same rules. There should be a clear set of rules. We believe that the way to do that is to bring political parties under the jurisdiction of PIPEDA.
    You're all keen observers of politics. You watched the recent U.S. presidential election, the Brexit referendum that happened in England, the implications of Cambridge Analytica—
    Three minutes go by very quickly, Mr. Cullen.
    Let me just end on this.
    Twenty-three years ago today we had a referendum in this country in Quebec. If a similar referendum were held in these contexts right now and the political parties were hacked because there wasn't proper privacy protections in law, imagine the result of that vote in Quebec, as it was with Brexit in England. There would be suspicion and the reality of foreign influence over a referendum question. A pivotal referendum question in Canada would be affected by outside sources.
    Would that real threat not present us with more urgency to actually do something about this in Canadian law, something that you, apparently, could abide by if we passed such legislation?
    That's a great question to leave hanging in the room as we close today.
    Thank you for coming today, Mr. Bailey, Mr. Fenrick and Mr. Calvert. We much appreciate your attendance at our committee as the officially recognized parties. Again, thank you for your appearance today.
    The meeting is adjourned.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 13:59:43 -0300
Subject: Fwd: YO Dominic Leblanc I figured you may enoy a little Deja
Vu from old news and from your cousin Chucky Leblanc's old blog on
April Fools Day 2006
To: NIA_IG@navy.mil
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 02:40:23 -0300
Subject: YO Dominic Leblanc I figured you may enoy a little Deja Vu
from old news and from your cousin Chucky Leblanc's old blog on April
Fools Day 2006
To: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, Dominic.Leblanc@parl.gc.ca, "Ian.Shugart"
<Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, ministryofjustice
<ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.fin"
<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming"
<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Cote" <Gilles.Cote@gnb.ca>,
police <police@fredericton.ca>, "dan. bussieres"
<dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>, martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca, "Juanita.Peddle"
<Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
<Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
"Lucie.Dubois" <Lucie.Dubois@gnb.ca>, "luc.labonte"
<luc.labonte@gnb.ca>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, "Jacques.Poitras"
<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "macpherson.don"
<macpherson.don@dailygleaner.com>, xtofury@gmail.com, Nathalie
Sturgeon <sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, "Nathalie.Drouin"
<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey"
<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Barbara.Whitenect"
<Barbara.Whitenect@gnb.ca>, "Mike.Comeau" <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>,
"Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, briangallant10
<briangallant10@gmail.com>, Brian Ruhe <brian@brianruhe.ca>,
"Paul.Lynch" <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>, paul
<paul@paulfromm.com>, "Paul.Harpelle" <Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333@gmail.com, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.bc.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nt.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, PREMIER
<PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "Holland,
Mike (LEG)" <mike.holland@gnb.ca>

Methinks your old buddy Fernand Robichaud is crying as he watches your
hero Jean Chrétien get caught with his pants down again exactly 18
years after the Yankees tried to pull that extraordinary rendition
nonsense on me while you dudes laughed at my troubles N'esy Pas

HMMM

https://ipolitics.ca/2019/02/08/snc-lavalin-affair-evokes-humiliation-of-sponsorship-scandal-in-quebec/

SNC-Lavalin affair evokes ‘humiliation’ of sponsorship scandal in Quebec
By Martin Patriquin. Published on Feb 8, 2019 4:56pm

    'Once again, and despite umpteen promises to the contrary, the
Liberal Party of Canada has allegedly attempted to force its way into
Quebec’s good graces through backroom deals and old-fashioned
political interference.'

I bet that I am not the only one who smells SNC Lavelin within this
stinky backroom dealing EH Madame Jody Wilson-Raybould???

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/chretien-nuclear-waste-project-1.5971996

Former prime minister Jean Chrétien part of secretive project to store
nuclear waste in Labrador, emails show

Chrétien defends project, saying Canada, as supplier of uranium, has
responsibility to dispose of it
Marie-Maude Denis, Jacques Taschereau, Daniel Tremblay  · CBC News ·
Posted: Apr 01, 2021 4:00 AM ET




---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 18:14:29 -0400
Subject: A little Deja Vu from Chucky Leblanc's blog on April Fools
Day 2006 when he and the Fat Fred City Finest were the best of friends
EH?
To: oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "lucie.dubois"
<lucie.dubois@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "luc.labonte" <luc.labonte@gnb.ca>,
andre <andre@jafaust.com>, "andy.campbell"
<andy.campbell@bellmedia.ca>, "Jacques.Poitras"
<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "macpherson.don"
<macpherson.don@dailygleaner.com>, sunrayzulu <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>,
"dougchristie@shaw.ca" <dougchristie@shaw.ca>, xtofury
<xtofury@gmail.com>, maryann4peace <maryann4peace@gmail.com>, grenouf
<grenouf@genuinewitty.com>, hjk <hjk@quesnelbc.com>, radical
<radical@radicalpress.com>, "Juanita.Peddle"
<Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
<Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn"
<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, GillesLee <GillesLee@edmundston.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "mclaughlin.heather"
<mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com>, police <police@fredericton.ca>,
"dan. bussieres" <dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>, "danny.copp"
<danny.copp@fredericton.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>

http://oldmaison.blogspot.ca/2006/04/roomers-truly-have-no-rights.html

Saturday, April 01, 2006

ROOMERS TRULY HAVE NO RIGHTS!!!

Picture 064, originally uploaded by Oldmaison.
EVICTION NOTICE
FOR CHARLES LEBLANC

It has been bought to my attention that you have been bloggling too
much and taking too many pictures without consent of individuals.

You must leave the premises in one houe as of this time and date.
7:15am April 2/06

Thanks

Millie and Jim



# posted by Charles LeBlanc @ 10:35 AM

Comments:
You are being evicted for blogging?
# posted by  Anonymous : 10:45 AM

Methinks it is because of our little spit and chew EH Frenchie? Did ya
notice the CT Yankee put back my work and a great deal more?
Give me a call at(506 434 1379) and try to call me a liar. I Double
Dog Dare Yaa Too. Say Hey to your wannabe lawyer buddy Vaughn for me
will ya.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
# posted by  Anonymous : 11:13 AM

April Fool's
# posted by  Anonymous : 11:13 AM

Way ahead of ya Frenchie I was already laughing at the joke
Verita Vincit
David Raymon Amos
# posted by  Anonymous : 11:24 AM

You ain't as quick on the draw all of a sudden. Did you fall asleep
Frenchie or have a stroke?
# posted by  Anonymous : 11:45 AM

who the heck is David Amos?
# posted by  City Under Siege The Fight for Saint John : 12:47 PM
is this for real. he is a good person, he trys to help people out. i
hope he is not evioted because he is a good person
# posted by  Anonymous : 12:58 PM

The obvious answer is: You see my phone number why not call me and ask
me direct? I ain't shy.It is not my fault you never heard of me. I ran
for a Seat in Parliament twice with no hope of getting elected if you
are so concerned about LNG whay not ask me what i know of the crap.
Furthermore I sent you some emails to prove my integrity. Didn't so it
I before I tried to post my comments in your blog? Why did you block
them? My question Mikey MacDonald is who the hell are you?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

Watch Frenchie prove his malice shaortly by making this blog melt as
he always does however As a double check I just emailed it to you and
Chucky in order to prove that it once existed.
# posted by  Anonymous : 1:24 PM

Mr Amos when I tore apart Mr Chases article I sent it to him with my
full name .I don't care that you know who I am.

I may soon have a pipeline running through my back yard which is going
to change the quality of life of my family.I am a citizen who got fed
up with one sided journalism.There is no smoke and mirrors with me.I
am calling them as I see them.If you don't like the blog .I guess all
I can say is don't blog or blog away .Thats what it is there for.I
don't expect everyone to agree with me.Thats democracy.
If you are trying to intimidate me with your rants.think again.
# posted by  City Under Siege The Fight for Saint John : 2:35 PM

No you think again Mikey Baby. USE your telephone as I challenged you
to do. The simple truth should not intimadate an honest man. It was
you who struck my words. If you had bothered to read my so called
rants before you ignored them and then asked the world you the Hell I
am, you would have noticed I agree with you and in fact know about
this crap than you can dream of.
# posted by  Anonymous : 2:48 PM

Now stayed tuned to this particular blog and watch Frenchie make it
melt. He is the liar not me. He labelled me as a Hells Angel when I
ran against the aptly named lawyer Rob Moore in Fundy in 2004. There
is no denying that I am a vindictive son of a bitch with a long memory
but even you must admit that i am fair. Although both Chucky and
Indymedia erased their blogs when I protested their obvious malice,
like you they erased everything I attemped to post. Ask yourself why
Mikey Baby and the cry me a river again about what Irving is having
crammed through your backyard. Guess who saves every word I write or
what is said of me to use in litigation? In answer to your question in
your own blog. Yes the people in Saint John should sue somebody in
order to put a stop to the evil Empires control. Good luck finding a
lawyer that ain't afraid of Irvings. You took a picture down as soon
as you got a phone call. In my book that makes you a chickenshit. You
talk the talk but do not walk the walk. You should have let them sue
you in order to meet them in court and make you issues well known and
recorded in the public record. I have been begging someone to sue me
for years if they think they can prove what I say is untrue because
whenever I sue them the corrupt courts meerely see it dismissed and
stricken from the record. Look up Byron Prior sometime in Google and
then tell me again that you
Obviously you used my phone number now I know yours. Clearly you just
pissed me off Lets see you apology ya bastard.
# posted by  Anonymous : 3:09 PM

ok...I just came back from moving someone. I see that David is
debating his issues again.

Listen David? I'll let a debate your issues in this blog here.

I must delete the blog that has emails.

As long you don't swear and smear anyone? You should be ok!!

Everyone has their different style of sending out their message.

I got mine and you got yours.

By the way? Evicted??? It was a April Fool joke from Millie and Jim
but I didn't bite!...lol
# posted by  Charles LeBlanc : 3:35 PM
This is weird! What in the hell is going on here?
# posted by  Anonymous : 3:38 PM

Hey David??? Why don't you start your own blog?

You got that email list and you could invite people to your site like I do!!!!
# posted by  Charles LeBlanc : 3:56 PM

THere's no site like Charles!!! Entertaining as all hell! I have no
idea what all these people are talking about, but it's more
entertaining than anything on television! God bless the loonies!
# posted by  Anonymous : 4:01 PM

February 24th, 2006

Rick Hancox Executive Director
c/o Suzanne Ball Senior
Legal Counsel
and Manon Losier General Counsel
and Secretary to the New Brunswick
Securities Commission
85 Charlotte Street, Suite 300
Saint John, NB E2L 2J2
RE: Securities Fraud and Public Corruption
Sir,
Pursuant to our conversation today please find enclosed exactly the
same material sent to the eight other provincial Attorney Generals in
Canada before I returned to my native land again this year. Obviously
the AGs Brad Green and Tom Marshall have known the truth of my matters
since the summer of 2004. They have maliciously ignored my false
imprisonment in the USA for their own political benefit. The tapes
enclosed are exactly the same copies that were served upon the lawyers
acting for Rogers Media byway of their newsman Tom Young today. As you
listen to the tape you will hear that I mentioned your Commission on
air in Saint John weeks ago. Methinks you should have called me then
instead of waiting for me to contact you again today.
The tapes and the CD of wiretap tape #139 are served upon the
Commission's lawyers Ms. Ball and Ms. Losier as in confidence as
officers of the court in order that my allegations of illegal wiretaps
by crooked law enforcement authorities may be finally properly
investigated ASAP by ethical law enforcement authorities. Hopefully
this will be done before I sue the Crown about my false imprisonment
but I am not holding my breath. April 3rd is coming fast. Upon your
study of these documents you will see that I have not yet given the
Yankee SEC all of my evidence of Securities Fraud. However every
Attorney General in Canada has been made well aware of it for quite
sometime before the SEC declared it was willing to investigate the
actions of the former Minister of Finance Ralph Goodale. To date not
one person has responded me nor did me the simple courtesy of
returning my calls or emails as you finally did today.
Clearly I must complain of the Crown myself without delay before
further harm is done to my Clan. Rest assured I will be calling you,
Mr. Hancox and the lawyers within your Commission to testify at a
trial of my matters in Federal Court in Fredericton. A very pigheaded
yet ethical Maritimer knows that justice has been delayed way past too
long for the benefit of public corruption and not the public trust. I
will not wait for anyone on public service to act within the scope of
their employment anymore. To put it simply, after our conversation
today I had no faith that you were willing to do your job.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
P.O. Box 234
Apohaqui, NB E5P 3G2
# posted by  Anonymous : 4:05 PM

Nope the first question should be Chucky where is the computer I gave
you in 2004 Yopu know the one the Anglo due from Minto took home for
you. You claimed it was no good yea well I would like to have it back
# posted by  Anonymous : 4:09 PM

The next question is does your buddy Vaughn Burnett still have the
material that you promised you would serve upon Brad Green in June of
2004 for me? Has he listened to the CD which is a copy of police
surveilance tape # 139? I will call hinm and you as witnesses to
testify in Federal Court in Fredericton. The wannabe lawyer and you
buddy Bernard Richard both admitted to me that they had the evidence
before I was falsely imprisoned in the Yankee jail in 2004. So much
for etyhical EH?
# posted by  Anonymous : 4:14 PM

What do you do with a computer that don't work?

You know the answer!

Papers? to deliver to the Justice Minister? Sorry...I'm not a Sheriff!!!!

Remember be nice in this blog....
# posted by  Charles LeBlanc : 4:16 PM

What's everybody talking or fighting about ?

Always read your site Charles.

The person is right. More entertaining the TV, and I mean that as Big
Compliment :>)
# posted by  Anonymous : 4:22 PM

As far as blogging goes I do have one but do not post much. Because
unlike you I feel that less is moreI do not need a blog I employ other
people's blogs and only deal with the issues they raise first then
take them down the path of the garden of good and evil just like I did
with you years ago when they call me a liar. Check with your associate
Mikey. He did not allow even my first comment. Just like your buddies
in Indymedia. However they certainly allowed you to slam me. Didn't
they Chucky?
Just in case anyone cares about the spelling I am typing quickly
because Methinks Chucky will soon erase this stuff just like he always
does. However here is my phone number again call me and I will show
anyone the proof of what I is true and I will even allow them to
listen to a wiretap tape or two.
# posted by  Anonymous : 4:22 PM

Your said the computer didn't work but I know that it did and I
brought it all the way from Boston because you were crying poor mouth
on the phone. Furthermore I have to witnesses that heard you say you
would love to take on Brad Green. the Anglo dude from Minto is one.
you the one you call a bigot. I was looking for you in the legislature
library to witness me serving the liberal lawyers Burke and Lamrock
next door at 710 Queen St when your buddy Dannyboy Bussieres and the
Fredericton cops threw me out on June 24th 2004. I was not talking
from the gallery as you falsely claim. I have a witness to that fact
to . In fact he is a Deputy Minister you was on the floor at the time.
the Commisssioners you have befriended made false allegations about
me.
# posted by  Anonymous : 4:29 PM

Charles? Friends with the commissioners?? That's funny! Sounds like
you two guys should be getting along great-two peas in a pod of crazy.
Nobody even knows what you guys are talking about.
# posted by  Anonymous : 4:41 PM

C'mon keep it going
# posted by  Anonymous : 4:44 PM

Anonymous said...
wroteBonjour

Mr. David Raymond Amos,

We respectfully invite you to consider a Letter to the Editor, i.e..,
How Free Trade undermines Maritime Economic Development. We had heard
you make some representation about a U.S. company which truck out
Maritime 'wealth', as a result of not having similar .provincial
resources rights as Alberta, Many Maritimes would be potentially
interested in such an editorial.

Merci.

Office of John Stokes

The Canadian National Newspaper
internet site: http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com
# posted by  Anonymous : 4:48 PM

Hey Mr. Stokes
Thanks for the suggestion. As you should know the most glaring example
of a company that has been raping the Maritimes with abandon for many
years is obviously the Irving Empire. However lately there are some
very nasty new players on the scene such a PCS and Corridor Resourses
etc etc. I am very busy these days and I am not a journalist. You
people are though yet it seems you would rather me say the awlful
truth than yourselves because of some possible lawsuit EH?
So be it. I will because it is not slander if one's words are true.
Perhaps you should consider checking my work and then come to court
sometime in order to listen to me argue all the smiling bastards. You
can have much of my work in a click of the button of my mouse. But
first please allow me to introduce you to the New Brunswick Securities
Commission. I got a rather interesting response from them today whilst
I was in Fredericton. They have ignored my concerns for almost a year
but now that Bernie Lord's government is getting tipsy, it appears all
the bad actors want to show me their arse just in time for me to boot
it.
It is Securities Commissions such as this that allow many publicly
held companies such as Corridor Resources or Magna Entertainment etc
to get away with many things rather than remind them of the law and on
how they should conduct business in an ethical fashion. That said,
these Commisssions have no say whatsoever over the Irving Empire and
that is truly bad. It is a privately held corporation that knows very
well the power of money and on how to pay off greedy politicians in
order to get anything they want. In the nutshell of the Maritimes that
is quite simply everything. It seems that I am the only Maritimer who
is not afraid of the ghost of mean old KC Irving and his monoply game.
It has always been hard times in the Maritimes. We lament about it all
the time but our apathy and fear of the Irvings etc gives us the
govenments we deserve.
Print this if you wish. You are off the hook that Irving's lawyers
threaten ordinary folks with. I am fearless yet never reckless with
the truth. I stand by my own words and invite anyone to sue me if they
think I am a liar and wish to argue me. I hate it when the
chickenshits send crooked cops against me bearing false allegations in
a faint hearted effort to shut me up. It does the smiling bastards no
good and only serves to make matters worse.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
# posted by  Anonymous : 4:52 PM

March 24, 2006

Michael “Tanker” Malley
C/o Cleveland Allaby
480 Queen Street
Suite # 200
Fredericton NB. E3B 1B6

Simpson Thacher & Barlett LLP
C/o Derek Burney
Chair of the Board of Directors of NB Power
515 King Street Fredricton, NB E3B 4X1

Jody Carr
C/o Paul Blackmore
Chestnut Complex
470 York Street
Fredericton, NBE3B 3P7

Patrick A.A. Ryan
Edgecombe House
736 King Street
Fredericton, NB E3B 1G2
Re: Public Corruption

Sirs,
Pursuant to my many phone calls and email to your offices please find
enclosed the material I promised to you before I file my complaints in
Federal Court in Fredericton. The CD which is a true copy of wiretap
tape number 139 is served upon you all in confidence as officers of
the court in order that it may be investigated byway of my suing the
Crown.
While Norm Betts and Derek Burney’s buddy Stevey Boy Harper is busy in
New Brunswick today trying hard to shore up the shaky government of
Jody Carr’s buddy, Bernie Lord with long delayed federal tax dollars.
I am polishing off my promises to crooked lawyers in the hope that the
very corrupt House crumbles ASAP. If not maybe President Chavez will
help me bankrupt the crooks working within NB Power within a crooked
government’s blessing. Methinks Tanker will need another lawyer if the
one he has now continues to play dumb. Lord paid Allaby a lot of money
to study the doings of the Justice Dept a long time ago. He should
understand the scene.
Shame on you all for forcing me to go to such lengths to protect my
rights under the Charter. Methinks you have underestimated my
diligence EH? Now ask yourselves why I don’t sue you after I sue the
Crown? I fail to see any reason not to. That is the only way I know of
to hold such people as you accountable. Stevey Boy Harper never will
even though he talks the talk of such things. Everybody knows what I
served upon his party’s lawyer Arthur Hamilton before I was falsely
imprisoned in the USA in 2004.
Despite whatever Act our latest Prime Minister wishes to introduce to
the Canadian people that he claims will compel our government to act
with integrity, he can never deny my right to drag anyone into court.
In fact he has done so himself in the past and I am no less of a man
than he. Even a simple pigheaded Maritimer has the right to argue the
law even with people who think themselves above it. How you all have
failed to uphold the law and the public trust placed in your public
office is either a matter of public record or soon shall be or my name
ain’t Dave. There is no Democracy without Truth and Justice. It is
just that simple.
Thats all for now fellas. I look forward to seeing you all in court
someday or I will die trying to make it happen in an ethical fashion.
It is just another one of those things I do that lawyers fail to
appreciate. Ask your friends why that is if you don’t already know.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
P.O. Box 234
Apohaqui, NB. E5P 3G2
# posted by  Anonymous : 5:15 PM

Hey
Everybody received hard copy in hand to their offices except of course
what the UPS dudes are bringing to Paul Shuttle and Andre Arthur.
Obviously Yankees ain't as quick as me even when I give them two days
head start. I have signatures and pictures to prove that all the New
Brunswickers named below got their material today as I promised last
week except for the sneaky Conflict of Interest Commmissioner Mr.
Patrick who hides behind locked doors. He just sent the Sergeant at
Arms who tried to run me off again.
However the Frenchman Danny Boy Bussieres had to accept my material on
behalf of the Commissioner and our Queen whom he represents no matter
how much he wishes to ban me from the Legislature. He didn't sign
anything but what transpired between us was witnessed by a man who was
not involved. I gave the crooked Quebecer hard copy in hand. Somebody
speaking for the Queen should answer me ASAP. EH? If Danny Boy wishes
to attempt to ban me from the Legislature again he really should put
it in writng. EH? Perhaps he should clearly state the reasons behind
his malice and who is accusing me of what. Otherwise I will ignore him
until we meet in court. Then I will have many questions for him on the
public record. I repeat, I have never threatened or harassed anyone.
The next time he and I meet I hope to have many witnesses watching our
exchange of words instead of just one man.The Sergeant at Arms Danny
Boy Brouseirres lake most lawyers and politicians is a liar.
I will leave you all to wonder who receives this email next but lets
just say I was very correct about my assessment of the Public
Utilities Board and the New Brunswick Securoties Commission. corrupt
Maritimers act just like crookedYankees. After all most of them are
lawyers and their brotherhood practices their malice across borders
all day long every day. The thing is can they trust each other when
the politiking gets down and dirty. Methinks there is no honour
amongst theives no matter how powerful they are. What say you? I know
your answer already and that only time will tell the tale to prove
what I say is true. Until then I will simply remain a man of my word
and hope for justice to prevail. It is your job to uphold the Public
Trust not mine.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
# posted by  Anonymous : 5:28 PM

March 24, 2006

Bernard Shapiro
Ethics Commissioner
C/o Andre Arthur MP
325 de l'Eglise
Donnacona, Québec G3M 2A2

Jean T. Fournier
Senate Ethics Officer
C/o Senator Noel Kinsella and Michael Comeau
Holy Cross House Rm. 206
St. Thomas University
Fredericton NB

Kevin Lynch Clerkc/o Paul Shuttle
Director of Legal Operations
Privy Council Office
59 Sparks Street
Ottawa, ON K1A 0A3

David Gourdeau
Commissioner for FederalJudicial Affairs
c/o Willa Doyle
District Administrator
Suite 100
82 Westmorland Street
Fredericton, NB E3B 3L3

Re: Public Corruption

Sirs,
Pursuant to my many phone calls and email to your offices please find
enclosed the material I promised to you before I file my complaints in
Federal Court in Fredericton. The CD which is a true copy of wiretap
tape number 139 is served upon you all in confidence as officers of
the court and or Parliamentarians in order that it may be investigated
byway of my suing the Crown.
While Stevey Boy Harper is busy in New Brunswick today trying hard to
shore up the shaky government of his little buddy, Bernie Lord with
long delayed federal tax dollars. I am polishing off all my promises
to crooked lawyers in the hope that the very corrupt House crumbles
ASAP.
Shame on you all for forcing me to go to such lengths to protect my
rights under the Charter. Methinks you have underestimated my
diligence EH? Now ask yourselves why I don’t sue you after I sue the
Crown? I fail to see any reason not to. That is the only way I know of
to hold such people as you accountable. Stevey Boy Harper never will
even though he talks the talk of such things. Everybody knows what I
served upon his party’s lawyer Arthur Hamilton before I was falsely
imprisoned in the USA in 2004.
Despite whatever Act our latest Prime Minister wishes to introduce to
the Canadian people that he claims will compel our government to act
with integrity, he can never deny my right to drag anyone into court.
In fact he has done so himself in the past and I am no less of a man
than he. Even a simple pigheaded Maritimer has the right to argue the
law even with people who think themselves above it. How you all have
failed to uphold the law and the public trust placed in your public
office is either a matter of public record or soon shall be or my name
ain’t Dave. There is no Democracy without Truth and Justice. It is
just that simple.
Thats all for now fellas. I look forward to seeing you all in court
someday or I will die trying to make it happen in an ethical fashion.
It is just another one of those things I do that lawyers fail to
appreciate. Ask your friends why that is if you don’t already know.

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
PO Box 234
Apohaqui, NB. E5P 3G2

UPS Ship Notification, Tracking Number 1Z24RW270464505354
Shipment Detail
Ship To:
PAUL SHUTTLE
PRIVY COUNCIL OFFICE
59 SPARKS STREET
OTTAWA ON K1A0A3
Number of Packages:1
UPS Service: EXPRESS SAVER
Shipment Type: Envelope
Tracking Number: 1Z24RW270464505354
Reference Number 1:813556NY
Reference Number 2:25/03 1339
Status: Billing Information Received
Shipped or Billed on: 27/03/2006 Tracking Number: 1Z 24R W27 04 6450 535 4
Service Type: EXPRESS SAVER
Note: UPS has received shipper's billing information electronically.
Billing information received does not indicate shipment pickup or
drop-off. Please contact the shipper for more details.

UPS Ship Notification, Tracking Number 1Z24RW270464505363
Shipment Detail
Ship To:
ANDRE ARTHUR MP
325 DE L'EGLISE
DONNACONA QC G3M2A2
Number of Packages:1
UPS Service: EXPRESS SAVER
Weight: 5.0 LBS
Tracking Number: 1Z 24R W27 04 6450 536 3
Reference Number 1:813557NY
Reference Number 2: 24/03 4399
Status: Billing Information Received
Shipped or Billed on: 27/03/2006
Tracking Number: 1Z 24R W27 04 6450 536 3
Service Type: EXPRESS SAVER
Weight: 5.00 Lbs
Note: UPS has received shipper's billing information electronically.
Billing information received does not indicate shipment pickup or
drop-off. Please contact the shipper for more details.

Tracking results provided by UPS: 27/03/2006 16:18 Eastern Time
# posted by  Anonymous : 5:32 PM

David Amos is mentally ill folks. just ignore him and maybe he will go
away. he is a criminal and a liar. he rants and raves like a lunatic.
he makes charlie seem like a choir boy. he is one sick s.o.b.
# posted by  Anonymous : 6:20 PM

Well I must say I am not surprised. I am in fact delighted to
introduce some folks in the Martimes to the man most responsible for
my false imprisonment in the USA. I have been fishing for him to make
his usual appearance within a Blog. If one speaks of the devil long
enough he is sure to appear. EH Chucky? This crook's name is Deputy
Dog Robert F. O'Meara of the Norfolk County sheriffs Dept. A bigger
snake in Massachusetts there never was. Right now it is suppertime and
I ain't goona let it grow cool worrying about what he may say of me
but rest assured I will relish and save every word of it. Stay tuned
and I will post many of his words that have been deleted from many
other blogs in order to protect him and the crooks who have covered up
his many crimes.
At least I have a name EH Deputy Dog? Even on the internet you use
girlfriend's Wicked Wanda Willard's ID
# posted by  Anonymous : 7:07 PM

Hey? As long he leaves his view in this little blog and not others? I
don't have a problem with the guy.

He's pretty mellow with his words compare to past emails.

Hey? We might have a second Spinks here???...lol
# posted by  Charles LeBlanc : 7:11 PM

David is a less of lunatic compared to Chucky.
# posted by  Anonymous : 7:15 PM
SPINKS??? WHERE ARE YA????
# posted by  Charles LeBlanc : 8:48 PM

Now that I finally see one vote of confidence.It is time to stress
Chucky's words to the max. Lets see if this post stands the test of
time. I am posting something that only a few politicians have seen.
Whereas Chucky's buddy Danny Boy Brussieres had banned me from the
Legislature and Chucky did not have the balls to deliver the material
to Brad Green I and my son, Max delivered in hand the matereial to
both of the following dudes offices in Moncton right after Canada Day
and Paul Martin's boat had been caught in Sidney with more coke than
coal on board. We then went home to where I was raised in Dorchester
Nb and I laughed at the thought of Charles LeBlanc as I drove through
his hometown. If he had had the sand to deliver this letter and the
material I had given him to Brad when he promised to so. He would be
my hero, Bernie Lord's government would have fallen, my adversary
Deputy Dog Robert F. O'Meara would have gone to jail instead of me and
most importantly my little Clan would be still in their home today. If
Brad Green Bernie Lord and Franky Boy McKenna had acted with integrity
I would not have to sue the Crown in order to have a fraudulent
warrant for my arrest revoked in the USA. Anyone should feel free to
print or email the text of this letter with abandon simply because
Brad Green answered it. I can email anyone a copy of his response in a
tif file. In fact I will email one to Frenchie and Deputy Dog Robert
F. O'Meara, Brad Green and his buddies first first. You will know that
Chucky got it first and can never play dumb no more. I will forward it
on to anyone who asks and they can decide you is crazy and who is not
and who is a liar and who is not. My email address is motomaniac_02186
at yahoo.com and my phone number is 506 434 1379 I do not call people
collect as Chucky does.

July 1st, 2004

Brad Green
c/oBernard Lord
132 Mill Road
Moncton, NB. E1A 4A5

Frank McKenna
c/o McInnis Cooper
655 Main St.
Moncton NB E1C 8T6
RE: Corruption
Hey Fellas,
Please find enclosed exactly the same material served upon Paul Zed
before he met Paul Martin at the airport last weekend. The copy of
wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence as officers
of the court in order that it may be properly investigated. As you
review the material it should be painfully obvious to you why I have
no respect for your chosen profession of lawyer/politician. I must say
that both Mr. Lord and Mr. McKenna were clever to keep some distance
from the recent federal election but I don’t think it was very wise
for Mr. Lord to have me expelled from the Legislature Building for
political reasons rather than legal reasons.
I have done as the Sargent at Arms ordered on June 24th and stayed
away from the Legislature and waited for it to take its summer break
so that no more bullshit about me can be said. I have now delivered
this material to your constituency office Mr. Lord so that you may
deal with this at a personal level with Mr. Green. I will complain of
you Mr. Lord and your friends Mr. Green, Mr. Armstrong and Mr. Burke
to court along with the Fredericton Police Dept. and the Sargent at
Arms if I do not receive a satisfactory response very quickly and
convince me of your ethics and stand with me. I have not heard from
the Fredericton Police Dept. thus I suspect that Corporal Ross has
done as he threatened and thrown this material in the trash for the
benefit of his fellow police officer, Mr. LeBlanc.
Mr. Green may I suggest that you study every word and listen to the CD
closely and prepare to argue every word if you disagree with the fact
that a fellow Canadian has the right to seek justice and relief for
the many wrongs practiced against him. What would you do if the Men in
Black had appeared at your door and were willing to take you away to
Cuba without counsel because of false allegations were made against
you in order to stop you from defending your family’s interests? As
you can see I have come home to protest these actions in a political
and legal fashion. I have done only as the Solicitor General Anne
McLellan has suggested and given the evidence to those who claim to
have jurisdiction over me. You speak for the Sargent at Arms and the
Fredericton Police. They dropped the ball the instant they pulled me
outside the building for no reason. They claimed jurisdiction but
refused to investigate. I have seen it reported that I had tried to
speak from the gallery and the Sargent at Arms falsely claimed that I
had attempted to serve someone within the legislature building. Both
statements are untrue. I left materials at the door in the custody of
the security guard as he requested. I was only looking to find Charles
Leblanc in order that he may witness me delivering the enclosed
materials to T.J. Burke’s office. This was necessary for me to do
because as you know most lawyers are reckless with the truth. I will
let your fellow politician/lawyer. Peter McKay, explain to you the
reason why that is. However it was no longer necessary to require a
witness because the Sargent at Arms and the Fredericton Police had
watched me go into 710 Queen St and come out without the material they
had just refused after harassing me. They are my witnesses as you are
now.
As for you, Mr. McKenna, I expect you and your fellow lawyers at
McInnes Cooper to uphold the law and conduct yourselves in a
professional manner according to the rules that allow you to practice
law for a fee. Don’t you think you should act ethically rather quickly
and report your newfound knowledge of crime? At the very least I have
made you witnesses to my complaints and rest assured I will be asking
you many questions in court if the RCMP doesn’t ask you first. Mr.
McKenna, I read your recent speech about how you likened the actions
of federal political leaders to various purebred dogs. I must add my
two bits worth to your comments. Those fancy dogs don’t hunt like the
mangy old mutt that is the guard dog of my little Clan. I don’t bark
but I am quick to bite. If you turn around you will see me sniffing at
your heels. If any lawyer makes one false move, I make every effort to
rip his nuts off. Check my work before you call me a liar.
I have followed the money home to the Maritimes. I find that you and
many other liberals have been in pursuit of filthy lucre every bit as
much as Mr. Mulroney, Mr. Crosbie and their many cohorts. The Maritime
Provinces have suffered the most from the many years of political
abuse by greedy lawyers and their bosses. Mr. Harper called Maritimers
defeatists but he failed to say who was beating us up. Obviously it
was federal politicians on both sides of the fence. The last thing Mr.
Martin is to me is noble. In my opinion he is a fine example of a very
crooked lawyer aspiring to be an adept politician like his daddy. I
view your speech about dogs simply as a little dog licking a big dog’s
nuts in a stylish way in order to win the Alfa male’s favor and
someday win his position amongst a pack of political thieves. Feel
free to argue me after you explain to me real slow how Cardinal Law
was legally removed from my complaint and what right the Men in Black
had to try to take me away because I am exposing the awful truth about
bad acting bankers and Feds. Please don’t pretend that you guys don’t
know a few very well heeled Yankees that have helped you along in your
own personal pursuit of happiness. Mr. Tobin got a great job working
for an interesting Conservative. Eh? Should Belinda listen to Mr.
Mulroney and Mr. Harper or to her new CEO? What do you think? How much
time do you think I may have left on the planet for asking such
questions as this? What do you think may cause my demise? In the end I
will rest assured that someday my ghost will be very vindictive
against lawyers that failed to uphold the law. At this point in time
it would be very easy for some lawyer to act ethically and become the
people’s political hero. What say you? Can you trust your legal and
political friends to not turncoat and stand with me? Interesting
dilemma, eh?

Cya’ll in Court:)
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton. MA. 02186

Certificate of Service

I, David R. Amos on July 2, 2004, I served the enclosed materials in
hand to the offices of Frank McKenna at McInnis Cooper 655 Main St.
Moncton NB E1C 8T6 and Bernard Lord at 132 Mill Road. Moncton, NB.E1A
4A5

David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
# posted by  Anonymous : 8:54 PM

"WOW" What a guy.Where did all that come from. Sounds like this guy
has a problem.NO maybe a lot of problems.Too bad.
# posted by  Anonymous : 9:32 PM

He just goes on and on doesn't he?
# posted by  Anonymous : 9:34 PM

yeah it's not pretty. it's like a car wreck that just keeps happening.
kinda scary knowing he is in our back yard again. Mr.Amos you need
professional help man. i can give you some numbers. you don't have to
live with your paranoia. there is help if you seek it.
# posted by  Anonymous : 9:48 PM

Before I can even begin to believe that you are for real Why not crawl
out of cyber space and into the real world. It stars by proving to all
that you have a name. Cheap shots under Anoymous in Chucky's ain't
worth squat to me unless you are man enough to look me in the eye and
stand by your words. I do What say you got a name and a set of balls
or just a mouth like Chucky?
# posted by  Anonymous : 10:01 PM

Only the crooks are scared that I am back in the Maritimers. A lot of
ordinary folks like me are laughing at how I am poking holes in their
stuffed shirts. This letter is wickedly funny, Both Adrienne Clarkson
and Herménégilde Chiasson answered this one after my wife and I and a
lawyer who wanted Rob Moore's seat in parliament visited the Police
Commission in New Brunswick. Bev Harrison would not answer this letter
or even return my calles even though he has represented me from my
spot on the hill since I landed home last year. His assistants have
affirmed to me several times that they received it. I am demanding an
answer from Tanker now tha old Bev's assistant Bill Oliver refused to
call me back for the last time on Friday. I do not care what the tough
talking Danny Boy Bussieres says only the Speaker can authorize the
Sergeant at Arms to ban a man from the legislature. Besides that the
Governor General his ultimate boss told me I was doing the right thing
before I returned to the USA and into Deputy Dog's buddy's jail. I
wiil put this letter and the responses in the same email to Chucky and
Deputy Dog

August 24th, 2004

Lieutenant-Governor of
New Brunswick,
Herménégilde Chiasson
Old GovernmentHouse
51 Woodstock Road
Fredericton, NB E3B 9L8
Phone (506) 453-2505
Fax (506) 444-5280

Speaker of the Legislative Assembly,
Bev Harrison
Constituency Office: Hampton-Belleisle
Room: Unit 4, 46 Keirstead Avenue
Hampton, NB E5N 5A4
Phone (506) 832-6464
Fax (506) 832-6466
RE: Corruption
Sirs,
Please find enclosed exactly the same material served upon Premier
Lord and Frank McKenna on the day after Canada Day and a copy of Brad
Green’s response. I have also enclosed a letter to Senator Joe Day
that was to be forwarded to the Arar Commission. The copy of wiretap
tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence as the Queen’s
representatives of in order that it may be properly investigated. I
ask New Brunswick’s Lieutenant-Governor of, Herménégilde Chiasson to
forward this material to the Governor General of Canada. I have
already emailed her notice to expect this material and I will email
her the text of this letter as well.
Whereas the Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick stands adjourned
until Tuesday, December 14, 2004, at 1 o'clock p.m, perhaps you fellas
can find a little time to answer me before I sue the Queen in the USA.
My questions are as follows: Why did Sergeant-at-Arms, Dan Bussieres
and the Fredericton Police Dept. ask me to step outside the
Legislature Building and then forever ban me from re-entering the
premises on June 24th, 2004? What will you do with your newfound
knowledge of crime?
It is only fair that I ask these questions. After all I am a Canadian
Citizen and I do have the right to ask any question to those who
represent me. Whether they are born to the position or elected or
appointed or merely hired, they all must uphold the law and the public
trust. The Queen of Canada, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, is the
official Head of State and is represented in New Brunswick by the
Lieutenant-Governor. Therefore, the Lieutenant-Governor is the nominal
Head of State at the provincial level, empowered with the
responsibility of representing the Queen in the province. Thus I have
asked him the aforesaid questions before I leave the jurisdiction of
New Brunswick.
The Ombudsman, Bernard Richard told me to take my matter up the
Speaker of the House and thus far Mr. Harrison has ignored my phone
calls and emails. Bev Harrison did have the opportunity to ask me any
question he wished before he decided not to vote for me. It seems he
would rather have the lawyer, Rob Moore speak for him in Parliament. I
would not be surprised to learn that Bev Harrison was the same man I
had spoken to months ago or that he had attended the debate in
Hampton. I have no doubt that Mr Harrison knows exactly who I am and
why I was in Fredericton that day. I am not a rebel just because I
make inquiries and demand that people in public service uphold the
law.
The problem is that on June 24th I was a candidate for the 38th
Parliament. I was busy challenging those still in public service such
as John Herron to do their jobs and uphold the law. I was merely in
the legislative building looking for the Frenchman Charles Leblanc so
he could witness me serve this material upon the lawyer, T J Burke
next door. I had made certain that many politicians were made well
aware of my concerns and allegations before coming home to run for a
seat in the next Parliament. The local liberal, Leroy Armstrong was
willing to debate me so I was giving this material to his liberal
lawyer friends to review. Dan Bussieres offended me for political
reasons not legal reasons. The Speaker of the House should not have
allowed the Sergeant’s actions or at least responded to my inquiry.
These must be irrefutable facts because after almost two months of
asking everyone imaginable about the actions of the Sergeant-at-Arms,
no one would even tell me his name let alone explain his actions, It
appears that the Government of Canada would rather assist corrupt
politicians within a country that had rebelled against the Queen than
assist one of her subjects to escape their harassment.
I must return to the USA because I have been summoned to court to
argue more false allegations made against me. Whereas my country is
willing to throw me back into Ashcroft’s clutches, I must complain of
the Crown. It seems the Yankees may have been right long ago when they
refused to pay taxes without proper representation. Perhaps Canada
should follow suit. We all know what has been said about the evils of
longstanding governments. What say you sirs? Am I speaking sedition or
common sense?
I have heard that Louis Riel once said that the French would take over
Canada without firing a shot. Now many of the French wish to separate.
Maybe true Canadians can reunite our country in the same fashion.
There is no need of the cartridge box as long as we properly employ
the soap box and ballot box. The tools of bloodless revolutions are
the laws of the land. They are in the hands of people begging us for
our vote every so often. Canada does not need to pay homage to a Queen
who will not check the work of the people representing her and us. We
need a new form of government. I agree with Louis Riel’s thinking when
he proclaimed that the Metis were “loyal subjects of Her Majesty the
Queen of England’. If we are rebels, we are rebels against the Company
that sold us” Although he was labelled a rebel, Louis Riel was a
Canadian patriot who did stop Western Canada from being absorbed by
the USA. He was also elected to Parliament twice. He would abhor NFTA
as much as I. The words in Riel’s diary are well worth heeding.
“O my God! Save me from the misfortune of getting involved with the
United States. Let the United States protect us indirectly,
spontaneously, through an act of Providence, but not through any
commitment or agreement on our part.” Riel stated in his diary this as
well: “God revealed to me that the government of the United States is
going to become extraordinarily powerful.”

Cya’ll in Court:)
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton. MA. 02186
# posted by  Anonymous : 10:20 PM

This letter really put Lizzy Weir's panties in a knot. Chucky's buddy
Bernie Richard answered me immediately but she never did. When I got
out of jail and jumped bail in the USA one year later and started
demanding answers from the NDP she was not long taking a job from
Bernie Lord and leaving her party in the toilet. Bernie Richard di the
same thing years ago to save Lord nasty little minority. The problem
is the liberals are no better ask the not so good Dr. Doherty if he
wishes to argue me in public about it. In order to argue him and the
pretty woman Bernie Lord had his eyes on I tried to run in Bernie's
snap election in Saint John Harbour because in my opinion I caused
Lizzy to quit and run off. I knew I would never be elected but the
decent folks who always voted NDP deserved to know the score and my
opinion of the LNG scene is worth listening to. However the not so non
partison Anne Hollies and her yo yo underling Paddy Addison illegally
refused me for the benefit of Bernie Lord.The Irvings and the Spanish
dudes who have lost their popularity in other countries want to put
such a dangerous thing right int the damned harbour and the crooked
Mayor suppots it? What planet is he from I must ask. People with no
names call me crazy. Well in retort I say if the politicians are sane
then I am glad I am nuts.
However before they put me away anyone can have this letter and Bernie
Richard's very dumb answer. I would not be surprised if this blog
turns into a pumpkin by midnight EH Chucky? However if you leave it up
I will post sometime a very wicked Cinderella Affadavit by Newfy
Johnny Crosbie's law firm of Patterson Palmer that will explain why
the liberal President in NB Greg Byrne has now gone solo.

August 24th, 2004

NDP Leader Elizabeth Weir
Constituency Office
39 King Square North
Saint John, NB E2L 1E6

Bernard Richard
Office of the Ombudsman
767 Brunswick Street
Fredericton, NB E3B 1H8

Re: Corruption

Sir and Madam,
Please find enclosed exactly the same material served upon New
Brunswick’s Lieutenant-Governor, Hermenegilde Chiasson and many others
today. The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in
confidence as officers of the court in order that it may be properly
investigated.
There is no need to be long winded with you two people. I can prove
contact with each of you and your associates many times. I know that
you are expecting this material and why I am providing it to you for
your review. Not only will I be mentioning your names today to the
Police Commission but your names can be found in various places within
my documents. I feel that you are entitled to review the material and
I am entitled to expect you to act ethically and with integrity as
would befit an officer of the court. What you will do with your
newfound knowledge of crime? Please send your response to this letter
to the address below. I can no longer linger in New Brunswick and wait
for politicians to find the time to uphold the Public Trust.

Cya’ll in Court:)
David R, Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186


CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, David R. Amos, of 153 Alvin Ave. Milton, MA. on August 25th, 2004,
I delivered the enclosed material to the Office of the Ombudsman,
Bernard Richard at 767 Brunswick Street, Fredericton, NB E3B 1H8.
Whereas the Provincial office building at 710 Queen St. is no longer
assessable to the public, I will provide these documents to Elizabeth
Weir’s Constituency Office at 39 King Square North Saint John, NB E2L
1E6 as soon as possible.

David R, Amos
# posted by  Anonymous : 10:57 PM

Some people sent me private emails asking me- Who the hell is that nut???

Well? As I said earlier in the day.

No swearing or smears and everything should be ok.

I can delete this particular blog in seconds but we'll keep it here.

So far so good....

Try to be nice....
# posted by  Charles LeBlanc : 11:18 PM

One no named dude lamented that I go on and on and I admit that that
is true. On ther other hand earlier another fella ask for more and
lamented that I was too slow posting. Rest assured I know most
Maritimers do not give a damn about legal crap or politics. I fit in
that boat as well it is just that the smiling bastards attacked me and
my little clan and I must defend myself the best way I know how. I
figure fire with fire so to speak so I went fiercely political and did
not care about being elected. I just wanted to make my issues public
for the benefit of my family first and foremost and the awful truth
only hurts crooks. Most folks would find this crap boring yet lawyers
and politicians like old women are gossips big time. They climb to the
top pulling on the balls of others to get there. Trust that many would
find this an interesting read. There is a lot to tell after being
blocked in most places for years and I am trying hard to stay local to
Fredericton only simply because that is the audience the Chucky draws.
If the dude don't like to read my stuff click to another of Chucky's
mindless blogs and look a pictures that take a long time to look at in
dial up.
For ethical lawyers (if there is such athing) benefit here is
something that will help explain the news today in a very funny light.
McAllister answered me but Miller did not. Miller's (David Hache's
too)law firm is merging with the rest of Patterson Palmer's outfit so
it appears I have now crossed paths with the same bunch of bastards at
least four times in various matters. Merging makes a firm more
powerful but it also opens the door to the need to defend the bad
actions of your many partners. Everybody knows you can't trust lawyer
the that Patterson and palmer in Halifax went with Franky Boy
McKenna's buddies i all to funny to me. The dudes in Turo are the only
smart ones in the bunch. They said to hell with them all. Maybe I will
give then a call. If you cannnot find an honest lawyer your might as
well hire the wisest one EH? As i said Byron Priors complaint will
prove to the Maritimes why. Look him up on the web or in front of
Parliament next week.

August 24th, 2004

Gary A. Miller
371 Queen St. Suite 400,
Fredericton, NB E3B 4Y9

George A. McAllister
212 Queen St.
Fredericton, NB E3B 1A8

RE: Corruption
Sirs,
Please find enclosed exactly the same material served upon New
Brunswick’s Lieutenant-Governor Hermenegilde Chiasson and many others.
The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence
as officers of the court in order that it may be properly
investigated.
Months ago I contacted you, Mr. McAllister by phone and informed you
that I wholeheartedly agreed with your standing that Insurance
companies were making the consumers cover their losses in the stock
market. Brad Green and Premier Lord played Ms. Weir and the Commission
like a fiddle and were merely doing their part to assist the interests
of the Insurance Companies at the expense of the public trust.
Although you were happy to hear that your opinions had been read and
understood, you definitely did not want my evidence supporting your
claims. Pursuant to my last statement to you, Mr. McAllister I have
now proved to you that I am a man of my word and I now expect you to
obey the Code of Conduct that you must obey in order to practice law
for a fee.
Mr. Miller, the same holds true for you. Within these documents you
will find the name of a lawyer you know very well, David Lutz. I find
this man to be a very poor example of an officer of the court and I
don’t mind telling the world my opinion of him. Please read my letter
to him and let me know as to whether or not you stand with him and
against me. If anyone were to ask me, Mr. Lutz is a man in need of
legal aid and has no right to charge others for his malicious
assistance. Will you spring to his defence when I file a complaint
against him? Whether you fellas like it or not I have now made you
witnesses to my sad complaints before I returned to the USA.
If I survive the malicious prosecution that I am looking forward to in
Boston next month, I will return to litigate in New Brunswick. There
is no middle ground for any lawyer to stand on in this battle within
two corrupt justice systems. All that I have demanded from any lawyer
is simple ethical conduct. Why is that too much to ask for?
I have read your various spit and chews with Brad Green and I must
admit I find them to be quite comical from my position as a layman in
the catbird seat. Rest assured that I will endeavour to make my
opinions widely known. Sue me if you wish. In fact I double dog dare
ya to. Bring this material to court so that the jury can have
something to read while we argue truth, justice and the Maritimes
kowtowing to the American Way.
Cya’ll in Court:)
David R, Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
# posted by  Anonymous : 11:26 PM

Even if you do delete it Chucky you know for a fact that I already
saved it. With luck I will be showing you a printed copy of it in
court someday. I will ask you many questions in public not private
emails about what the hell you know about this crap. Why you lied
about me called me names and didn't give Brad Green my material as you
promised spoke volumes to me about your integrity. Don't even try to
argue me about my manners. I know how to behave myself it is you who
does not.
# posted by  Anonymous : 11:32 PM

2005 01 T 0010

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
TRIAL DIVISION

BETWEEN:
WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF
AND:
BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT

AND BETWEEN:
BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT/PLAINTIFF
BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF/FIRST DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: T. ALEX HICKMAN SECOND DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: THOMAS MARSHALL THIRD DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: DANNY WILLIAMS FOURTH DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: EDWARD M. ROBERTS FIFTH DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: JOHN CROSBIE SIXTH DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: PATTERSON PALMER SEVENTH DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM
SUMMARY OF CURRENT DOCUMENTCourt File Number(s):2005 01 T 0010Date of
Filing of Document:25 January 2005Name of Filing Party or
Person:Stephen J. MayApplication to which Document being filed
relates:Amended Application of the Plaintiff/Defendant by Counterclaim
to maintain an Order restricting publication, to strike portions of
the Statement of Defence, strike the Counterclaim in it’s entirety,
and to refer this proceeding to case management.Statement of purpose
in filing:To maintain an Order restricting publication, to strike
portions of the Statement of Defence, strike the Counterclaim in its
entirety and refer this proceeding to case management.
A F F I D A V I T

I, Stephen J. May, of the City of St. John’s, in the Province of
Newfoundland and Labrador, Barrister and Solicitor, make oath and say
as follows:

THAT I am a Partner in the St. John’s office of PATTERSON PALMER
solicitors for William Matthews, the Member of Parliament for
Random-Burin-St. George’s in the Parliament of Canada.

THAT Mr. Matthews originally retained Mr. Edward Roberts, Q.C. on or
about 30 April 2002 after Mr. Byron Prior, the Defendant/Plaintiff by
Counterclaim, had made allegations against Mr. Matthews in a
publication called “My Inheritance - The truth - Not Fiction: A Town
with a Secret”. In that publication, the allegation was made that Mr.
Matthews had had sex with a girl who had been prostituted by her
mother. That girl was alleged to have been Mr. Prior’s sister.

THAT upon being retained, Mr. Edward Roberts wrote a letter to Mr.
Prior. That letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit “1" to my
Affidavit.

THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts’ letter to Mr. Prior, Mr. Roberts
received a 1 May 2002 e-mail from Mr. Prior. That e-mail is attached
as Exhibit “2".

THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts receipt of the e-mail, Mr. Prior swore
an Affidavit acknowledging that what had been said in that publication
was false. That Affidavit is attached as Exhibit “3" to my Affidavit.
Following Mr. Roberts’ receipt of that Affidavit, Mr. Matthews advised
that he was satisfied not to pursue the matter any further and our
firm closed our file.

THAT on or about 25 October 2004, I was retained by Mr. Matthews
following his gaining knowledge that a web site, made a series of
allegations against him relating to my having sex with a girl of
approximately 12 years old through to an approximate age of 15 years
old. It also accused him of being a father of one of her children and
accused him of having raped that girl. Upon checking the web site I
saw that Byron Prior, the Defendant, had been identified as the author
of the material on the site.

THAT Mr. Matthews instructed me to write Mr. Prior, to remind him of
the fact that the allegations had been admitted to being false through
a 16 May 2002 Affidavit to advise him of Mr. Matthews’ intentions to
commence legal proceedings if the comments were not removed from the
web site. A copy of my letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit “4"
to this Affidavit.

THAT I attach as Exhibit “5" a transcript from a 5 November 2004
voicemail left by David Amos, identified in the voicemail as a friend
of Mr. Prior.

THAT I attach as Exhibit “6" a portion of a 6 November 2004 e-mail
from Mr. Amos.

THAT until I received his voicemail and e-mail, I had never heard of Mr. Amos.

THAT Mr. Amos has continued to send me e-mail since his 5 November
e-mail. Including his 6 November 2004 e-mail, I have received a total
of 15 e-mails as of 23 January 2005. All do not address Mr. Matthews’
claim or my involvement as Mr. Matthews’ solicitor. I attach as
Exhibit “7" a portion of a 12 January 2005 e-mail that Mr. Amos sent
to me but originally came to my attention through Ms. Lois Skanes
whose firm had received a copy. This e-mail followed the service of
the Statement of Claim on 11 January 2005 on Mr. Prior. I also attach
as Exhibit “8" a copy of a 19 January 2005 e-mail from Mr. Amos.

THAT I attach as Exhibit “9" a copy of a 22 November 2004 letter
addressed to me from Edward Roberts, the Lieutenant Governor of
Newfoundland and Labrador covering a 2 September 2004 letter from Mr.
Amos addressed to John Crosbie, Edward Roberts, in his capacity as
Lieutenant Governor, Danny Williams, in his capacity as Premier of
Newfoundland and Labrador, and Brian F. Furey, President of the Law
Society of Newfoundland and Labrador. I requested a copy of this
letter from Government House after asking Mr. Roberts if he had
received any correspondence from Mr. Amos during his previous
representation of Mr. Matthews. He advised me that he received a
letter since becoming Lieutenant Governor, portions of which involved
his representation of Mr. Matthews. Mr. Roberts’ letter also covered
his reply to Mr. Amos.

THAT I attach as Exhibit “10" an e-mail from Mr. Amos received on
Sunday, 23 January 2005.

THAT I swear this Affidavit in support of the Application to strike
Mr. Prior’s counterclaim.


SWORN to before me at
St. John’s, Province of Newfoundland
and Labrador this 24th day of
January, 2005.


Signed by Della Hart STEPHEN J. MAY Signature
STAMP
DELLA HART
A Commissioner for Oaths in and for
the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador.
My commission expires on December 31, 2009.
# posted by  Anonymous : 11:43 PM

Dear Mr. Amos,

On behalf of Ms. McLellan I would like to thank you for your email
message concerning the current federal election. I regret that the
volume of messages prevented me from responding sooner.

Your message has been brought to Ms. McLellan`s attention, as she is
always pleased to receive comments, both positive and negative.

Again, thank you for bringing this matter to Ms. McLellan`s attention.

Sincerely,
Kirsten Odynski
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister
# posted by  Anonymous : 11:47 PM

Hey Mr. Costello
Need I say I was not impressed by you yesterday. At least you
confessed that you knew who I was but so much for a jealous defense of
your client’s interests. EH? That said there is no need to send you
hard copy of my material. Your associates within McInnes Cooper
already have enough to review and confer with you about.
Perhaps you should call the dudes or ladies (: Tell them how I chuck
rocks will ya? from Patterson Palmer in Halifax that merged with your
firm or better yet Lenny Hoyt and Franky Boy McKenna. In my humble
opinion your little buddy Franky Boy as Canadian Ambassador should
have tried to stop NB Power’s malicious lawsuit against Venezeula in
the USA before it picked up steam. But what do I know. EH? I think the
dudes from Venezeula were wise to bring the issues back to the
Maritimes and into the Irvings’ lap. I think it was a hoot that they
employed your firm to do so. What say you? Whereas you do not wish to
speak to me I will speak to these dudes about you, Embassy of
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, 32 Range Rd Ottawa Ontario K1N 8J4,
Phone: 613 235-5151 and then send them what I sent Allan Rock Franky
Boy Mckenna and the FBI almost one year ago. Perhaps you should call
some of your friends mentioned below that I served my stuff upon
yesterday after I talked to you and ask them what the Hell I am up to
if you don’t already know.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

P.S. the following was an interesting article to come out in the local
paper just as Humpty Dumpty had the Governor Gerneral drop the Writ on
the last election. It certainly seems to me that the Irving’s and
Bernie Lord were trying hard to help Stevey Boy Harper’s government
and John Wallace get elected in order to protect their own selfish
interests. EH? If he won’t tell ya then ask me why Franky Boy does not
want to be the liberal leader right now. I Double Dog Dare Ya. As I
said in closing yesterday you have my number but maybe the dudes from
Venezeula lost it so here it is again 506 434 1379. Your problem is do
I want to talk to you now. Whilst I am talking to your clients about
your incompetance I will explain to them why I am preparing to sue
your whole god damned law firm.

November 25, 2005
Liberal leader ‘jeopardizing’ NB Power’s chances in lawsuit over
failed Orimulsion deal: Tory MLA
New Brunswickers should question whether Liberal Leader Shawn Graham
is fighting for them or for Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, says a
Tory MLA. Jody Carr, MLA for Oromocto-Gagetown, made the stinging
indictment against Mr.Graham Thursday during a heated committee
hearing where the Liberal leader took repeated swipes at David Hay, NB
Power’s president and chief executive officer, for failing to answer
legal questions regarding the utility’s Orimulsion lawsuit. Mr. Graham
questioned some of the tactics being advanced by NB Power’s legal
staff and demanded to know how much the power corporation budgeted for
the legal battle against the Venezuelan government and its state-owned
oil company.
Mr. Carr said the Liberal leader crossed the line in Thursday’s
committee hearing and could endanger NB Power’s lawsuit. “The issue is
complicated and it shows the issue is far over his head to what he can
comprehend,” Mr. Carr said in an interview later."He was in effect
working on the side of the Venezuelan government by jeopardizing the
court proceedings."He was jeopardizing the chances of government and
NB Power recouping the $2.2 billion in savings and therefore, in
essence, that put him on the other side.” NB Power restarted its
lawsuit on Sept. 1, when it filed a statement of claim looking for
$2.2 billion in financial damages, which equates to the price
difference between purchasing heavy fuel oil to burn at the Coleson
Cove Generation Station and Orimulsion, a cheap water-and-bitumen
mixture patented by Petroleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PDVSA).
NB Power has hired Stewart McKelvey Stirling Scales to quarterback the
lawsuits filed in Fredericton and New York along with Simpson Thacher
& Bartlett LLP to serve as their U.S. counsel. Mr. Hay estimated that
the corporation has already spent as much as $600,000 on legal bills
relating to the Orimulsion lawsuit.The Liberal leader grew
increasingly frustrated when Mr. Hay stonewalled his attempt to get a
firm answer on NB Power’s budget for Orimulsion-related legal fees.
“For the life of me I can’t understand how it could jeopardize the
court proceedings in saying how much we are thinking this court
challenge may cost,” Mr. Graham said.Throughout the committee session,
Mr. Hay assured the Liberal leader that the power corporation was
evaluating the risk-reward ratio at each legal “fork in the road.” Mr.
Hay said he cannot disclose any details that could tip the utility’s
legal hand considering the Venezuelans are keeping a close eye on the
proceedings."We are dealing with people with extremely deep pockets.
And if you go to a poker game “... and you say, I have my $1,000 here
or whatever it is you are playing with, that gives an advantage to the
other side,” Mr. Hay said.
Mr. Carr also accused Mr. Graham of misleading Saint John residents
about the Orimulsion costs during the recent byelection campaign in
Saint John Harbour. Mr. Carr said he found it disconcerting that
Liberal campaign signs said the Conservative government lost $2.2
billion through the bungled Orimulsion fuel deal but now Mr. Graham
admits the money was a “potential loss of savings.”
- Daniel McHardie - Canadaeast News Service Source: Telegraph-Journal
| page A5 on Nov. 25, 2005
# posted by  Anonymous : 11:57 PM

From: “Steve Erickson”
To: motomaniac
Subject: from Steve Erickson from Masschusetts
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 19:26:32 +0000


Mr. David Amos,
we talked about 2 years ago. My cell that we talked on is [Boston area
code cellphone # snipped]

Much has happened good for me since then.

Are you in Canada, in Parliment, or are you still in the Boston area?

-Steve Erickson


Does this stuff answer your question Stevey Baby? I read what you said
of me within your long winded Blogs. I told you the truth years ago
and now I will tell you a little bit more. To me you are just another
greedy sneaky Yankee now. But to be fair to you I must admit that we
have our share of bull___ing bloggers and crooked politicians in the
Maritimes as well One of them is a Frenchie named Charlie Leblanc and
another named Bernie Lord. Please allow me to introduce them and some
of their cohorts to you. Their emails are wittin and his Blog and
yours is below. How dare you bastards imply that I am a one percenter
in order to promote yourselves.

http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/2006/03/very-first-day-at-new-brunswick.html

This is obvious Bull__ supported by Charlie Leblanc for his old buddy
the malevolent Sergreant at Arms Danny Boy Bussieres were talking two
years ago. Now that he has lost his trusted staus he files a human
rights compalint after he laughed at my false imprisonment in a Yankee
jail?

Original article is at
http://maritimes.indymedia.org/news/2004/06/7980.php Print comments.
IS ELVY ROBICHAID SEEING THE LIGHT????
by Charles LeBlanc Friday, Jun. 25, 2004 at 10:56 AM
Fredericton

updates from Charles

I got a few late stories that I want to bring up.
They had a protest at the Legislature on Wednesday
and I would say about 400 people showed up. I made my
own little investigation in the crowd and I soon found
out that many people from the Northern Part of the
Province knew about my protest.
These Acadians read about my protest in L’Acadie
Nouvelle! A few weeks earlier, I found out that the
English Population from the Miramichi area didn’t know
about my fight so this shows me that it’s so important
to have the media covering your issues.
During the protest, I felt like I was in a police
state. There were cops are over the place. I
approached three of them and said - My God? We need
violence, bricks going through windows, people being
shot and tear gas!!!
This is the only way that the Government will
listen.
One cop said - If I have to use my gun? I know
exactly where my first bullet is going to go!! Pretty
scary…lol….
Speaking of violence?
That guy from the Sackville area who went to
Toronto with his vehicle full of guns! Very scary
Stuff!!!
What did I tell you people in the past? Someone is
going to crack up one of these days and I know for a
fact the area targeted is going to be the Legislature.

There’s always undercovers cops around but only
when the House is in session.
As God as my witness I hope nothing happens but
it’s just a matter of time till someone is push over
the edge.
I guess a guy name David Amos was shown the door
yesterday at the Legislature. This guy is running as
an Independent candidate in the riding of Fundy Royal.
I met the guy over the net and he has a beef with our
political bureaucrats.
I admire people fighting for what they believe in
but you can’t get carried away. I guess in this case?
He wanted to speak from the Gallery and that’s a big
faux pas!
# posted by  Anonymous : 12:04 AM

After Stevey Boy Harper gets sworn in I will call Washington to see if
Spectre got the wiretap tapes and then start forwarding this email
everywhere. In an ethical effort to impeach Bush and his lapdog Harper
myself.
What did Lamrock, Burke, Murphy, McGuinley and you think of the copy
of # 139? Scared the shit out of you EH? Whereas you little local
liberal lawyers would not help me unseat Premier Lord and stop Stevey
Boy Harper in h9s tracks i will through in the same lawsuits with him.
It is hard to get good help these days. The word integrity does not
fit in the job discription of a lawyer or a Parliamentian. EH?
The fact that Emerson just crossed the floor and the Dastardly Dave
Dingwall story broke yesterday kinda sends your wicked little party
down the tubes EH? From my point of view it looks good on you dudes.
Say Hey to Franky Boy McKenna for me will ya? I hope to argue you all
very soon in court.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos



FEDERAL EXPRESS February 7, 2006
Senator Arlen Specter
United States Senate
Committee on the Judiciary
224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Mr. Specter:

I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that
these are illegal FBI wiretap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in
contact with you about this previously.

Very truly yours,
Barry A. Bachrach
Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003



David Amos wrote

To Whom it may concern
I know Petey Baby MacKay don't love me so there is no sense in wasting
my dime calling him. Hell he has refused to answer my letters or call
me back even after Belinda Baby dumped him, so I do not expect him to
do the right thing as Minister of Foreign Affairs other than to accept
nasty little Franky Boy McKenna's resignation ASAP. Tell me is Franky
Boy entitled to severance pay like his fellow Malawyer ritime buddy
Dingwall is? Whereas the liberals Wayne Easter and Landslide Annie
refused to protect my dumb arse over the years in their capacity as
Solicitor General/Minister of Public Safety. I guess I should be fair
and allow it Mr. Day's to try to act ethically on my behalf for a day
or so, before I sue the Crown. EH?
Rest assured that I ain't holding my breath waiting for Mr. Day to
call me back. Like many of the rest of you Stockwell Day has known of
my troubles ever since Harper was elected as his latest boss in 2004
when he sat in the 37th Parliament
In the meantime in answer to Andrew Kyrstal's very dumb question on
the radio just now.,methinks I should inform the NHL dudes that are
being prosecuted by corrupt Yankees how I can help them.I know Andrew
Kystral and all the Rogers dudes never will. What the New Jersey Dudes
are up to right now is merely a case of the big bad pot calling a
minor little kettle black to me and Andrew Kyrtal knows it too. Just
like the Lord Conrad Black versus FitzGerald matter in Chicago
everybody is trying to play dumb and it was to funny that Peter C.
Newman apologized after I sent his lawyers some of my stuff..
Tell me something honestly if any you can find it in your soul to do
so. Do you really think that the Conservatives thought that I didn't
notice that Mulroney's right hand man Dereck Burney set up your
Cabinet or that Michael Fortier was not a partner in his law firm?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
# posted by  Anonymous : 12:12 AM

As a little reward Frenchie Here is the reason Franky Boy McKenna,
Allan Rock, John Manley, and Brian Tobin will not run for leader of
the liberal party.
Call them and ask them or the FBI to sse if they wish to call me a
liar. Better yet call the Yankee Senators Arlen Spevter or Russ
Feingold. Nitey night Chucky. The clock clicked past midnight and the
blog has not turned into a pumpkin yet. I am impressed with your your
Newfound sense of integrity but quit the wise cracks and try to say
something about this crap I have posted that really matters. Will ya?
A polite argument in public in front of many witnesses would be nice.

May 11th, 2005

Ambassador: H.E. Mr. Allan Rock
One Dag Hammarskjold Plaza
885 Second Avenue , 14th Floor
New York , NY 10017

Ambassador Franky McKenna
Canadian Embassy
501 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20001

Assistant Director Louis M. Reigel III
Federal Bureau of Investigation
J. Edgar Hoover Building
935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001

Special Agent David Price
FBI Minneapolis
Suite 1100
111 Washington Avenue, South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401-2176

RE: Rampant Public Corruption in Canada and the USA
Hey,
Now that Paul Martin has finally set the date for his confidence vote,
methinks its time to pack my bags and head for home. I must raise some
serious political hell in the Maritimes before the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts does its worst to bankrupt my wife and put my kids on
the street before I can expose the rampant public corruption. This is
also a very good day to prove within the USA that we are well aware of
each other and of my concerns and allegations in order to stress test
the integrity of the US Mail. It and the Canada Post have failed me
big time in recent years particularly just before the Yankees falsely
imprisoned me last year for the benefit of George W. Bush, John Kerry
and Paul Martin to name a few. I have no doubt whatsoever each of you
dudes know more about me than I do about you. However that does not
mean that I have not studied each of you a lot more than the ordinary
layman. Just so we are clear, I have no respect for any of you. I know
that all of you are as crooked as Chief Mearn, his cops and the
lawyers who are coming into our home tomorrow without a warrant. This
mail should prove your malice and willingness to support crime and
public corruption.
Pursuant to my many emails, phone calls and faxes etc., you will find
enclosed as promised exactly the same material I served upon the
Solicitor Generals Teddy Olson and landslide Annie McLellan last year
before I ran for Parliament last year. The CD of the copy of wiretap
tape # 139 is served upon you as officers of the court and FBI Agents
in order that it may be properly investigated. Franky got this stuff
and more last year. The FBI got even more the year before. Perhaps
they should go find the original tapes that the Suffolk County
District Attorney and Special Agent in Charge Ken Kaiser have been
playing dumb about for far too long. This material was good enough to
impeach George W. Bush last year and cause many people to quit or lose
their jobs. It is every bit as valuable today and you all know it. Ask
the many people whose names can be found within these documents or
Franky Boy or Claude Richer, Allan Rock’s lawyer buddy in the RCMP
about this stuff before you call me a liar. As you all know I am out
of jail on bail pending my upcoming criminal trial in front of a jury
of my peers. I have the right to remain silent in the USA. I will
employ different rights in Canada and say a lot.
What I choose to say while stumping for a seat in Parliament in Canada
is of my concern not yours. If you dudes do your jobs here and I act
ethically and legally up home with luck the world will be far better
off in short order. I have already checked the rules with the people
working for Elections Canada. We agree it is perfectly legal for an
innocent man to run for Parliament while being prosecuted with false
charges in the wrong jurisdiction and venue in the USA. Everybody
knows I can secure my personal freedom quicker in a political forum in
Canada rather than argue crooked judges in the USA. They have already
imprisoned me on bull**** charges without even reading me my rights or
telling me why I was in jail. The crooks are not going to have a
sudden fit of ethical behavior now without it becoming a matter of
political will. We all know it is high time for a change, the sooner
the better for the Maritimes as well as the rest of the world. What
better politician to argue with than a right wing lawyer named Rob
Moore?
As you all no doubt know I have been talking to many people within the
UN and have sent many much of my stuff. You all must have laughed as
hard as I did when the Cubans were afraid to talk about my stuff. I
must agree with George Bush about one thing. The UN is certainly in
need of an overhaul. Yet we all know that nasty dudes like Maurice
Strong’s buddy, Paul A. Volcker, the Former North American Chairman of
the Trilateral Commission and Karl Rove’s puppet, John Bolton are just
going to make matters worse. The same holds true with the turncoat
Robert C. Pozen. He now offers advice to Bush on how to fix Social
Security simply because I sent him running for cover with my Putnam
Investment concerns and the malevolent media control of Global
Corporations. Feel free to argue me or act ethically. You choose. I
don’t care. Franky Boy knows he is way past too late. I am just
rubbing his nose it before I talk a lot about him and his failure to
uphold the public trust in our old stomping grounds up home. I can’t
help but wonder how he explained his “Harper is a lapdog for Bush”
dogma to Karl Rove and his nasty cohorts. I suspect it was an allowed
comment from an insider of the Carlyle Group. Don’t you? We all know
Stephen Harper would never fit in that group. He is as dumb as a post.
All of his successes playing at politicking have just been a matter of
luck and playing on the PC and Liberal scandals. Harper is kinda scary
to me. He has a truly awful agenda in store for all Canadians like
evil old T. Alex Hickman and Johnny Crosbie did for our Newfys.
Sometimes less is more. So in conclusion I will just quote former
Inspector General of the DHS Clark Kent Irwin and simply say it would
have benefited all if he had taken his own advice way back in November
of 2003 when he had an important job.
POGO: “Any advice for your fellow public servants?”
Irwin: “Well, just do your job and let the political chips fall where
they may. Unless you’re willing to do that, it seems to me you
shouldn’t take the job in the first place.” What say you?

Cya’ll in Court:)
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton MA. 02186

They got their mail now. Check for yourself


USPS Track & Confirm

Current Status

You entered 0302 1790 0001 6045 6592

We attempted to deliver your item at 6:58 am on May 14, 2005 in
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 and a notice was left. It can be redelivered or
picked up at the Post Office. If the item is unclaimed, it will be
returned to the sender. Information, if available, is updated every
evening. Please check again later.

Here is what happened earlier:
ACCEPTANCE, May 12, 2005, 9:30 am, QUINCY, MA 02169

Current Status

You entered 0302 1790 0001 6045 6608

We attempted to deliver your item at 8:04 am on May 14, 2005 in NEW
YORK, NY 10017 and a notice was left. It can be redelivered or picked
up at the Post Office. If the item is unclaimed, it will be returned
to the sender. Information, if available, is updated every evening.
Please check again later.

Here is what happened earlier:
ACCEPTANCE, May 12, 2005, 9:32 am, QUINCY, MA 02169

Current Status

You entered 0302 1790 0001 6045 6615

We attempted to deliver your item at 4:03 am on May 14, 2005 in
WASHINGTON, DC 20535 and a notice was left. It can be redelivered or
picked up at the Post Office. If the item is unclaimed, it will be
returned to the sender. Information, if available, is updated every
evening. Please check again later.

Here is what happened earlier:
ARRIVAL AT UNIT, May 14, 2005, 4:01 am, WASHINGTON, DC 20022
ACCEPTANCE, May 12, 2005, 9:31 am, QUINCY, MA 02169

Current Status

You entered 0302 1790 0001 6045 6707

Your item was accepted at 9:32 am on May 12, 2005 in QUINCY, MA 02169.
Information, if available, is updated every evening. Please check
again later
# posted by  Anonymous : 12:21 AM

So charlie what papers did he ask you to deliver to brad Green?

And why didn't you complete the task?
# posted by  Anonymous : 9:26 AM

Hey David Amos you complain about Chucky's pictures. He posts many
pictures of himself so you fall in love with him. He really likes you.

Chucky really needs you.
# posted by  Anonymous : 9:58 AM

I am impressed with Chucky's newfound sense of ethics the blog still
stands this morning. If anyone would like to view the material and
listen to a copy of a wiretap tape that Chucky and his buddy Vaughn
are so afraid of all they have to do is call me and meet me in public
somewhere before I leave Fredericton. I am sitting in town right now
and trying to write my first complaint to file in Federal Court ASAP.
Here is my cell number again 506 434 1379
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
# posted by  Anonymous : 10:44 AM

Methinks Mr Amos is a wacko
# posted by  Anonymous : 12:22 PM

Mr. Amos is in good company with Charlie though. They will get along
fine. They seem to have a lot in common.
# posted by  Anonymous : 12:39 PM

Methinks too but Mr. Amos is in good company with Charlie though. They
will get along fine. They seem to have a lot in common.
# posted by  Anonymous : 12:39 PM

Oh ye critics with no names why not pick up the phone tomorrow and
call your Ombudsman and Chucky's buddy Bernie Richard mention my name
and ask him whether or not he received this email on August 11th, 2004
at 3.11 pm two weeks before he met my family in his office. Then if
you grow up and get a name and an emaiul address watch me prove to you
I am no friend of Charles Leblanc


Hey Bernard
Thanks for your response though. I didn't believe you on the phone the
instant that you tried to make an issue about not receiving the email
to Wayne Steeves. I figured that you were covering for Brad Green
because that would mean that you knew the CISNB was involved. I
laughed when you repeated it in the email. Do you think me dumb?The
Fredericton PD guard the legislature correct? Ask Sgt. Kelly or Chief
Carlisle if they had jurisdiction over me when they threw me out. The
Crown always has jurisdiction over a Canadian citizen particularly
when he is on native soil. I figured out it was Dan that threw mw out.
He should have taken the stuff in the yard just as soon as he affirmed
that he and the cops had jurisdiction over me as he ordered me away
from the legislative building. They did watch me go into 710 Queen St
to serve TJ Burke and come out without the stuff. They know I did it.
Over Two hundred people watched me serve Leroy.Armstrong once he stuck
his nose in my affairs. Anne McLellan and Brad Green both suggested
that I give this stuff to cops that claim jurisdiction. Go argue Bruce
Noble. .I don't need any luck Uncle Franky has been dead for two
months even though no one has notified my wife I know it. Watch me
turn the worm on the Secret Service, the FBI and the RCMP
There is no way you could have known about Connie Fogal without
getting Wayne Steeves' email as well. He should have sent the CISNB
out to do their job by now. Obviously that is not the case. Maybe
Elizabeth Weir will have more luck making you understand. As for me I
simply don't trust you. I will be calling you to court. We can argue
about integrity and jurisdiction there. In the mean time perhaps you
should go find Leroy Armstrong or T J Burke or Brad Green or Premier
Lord or Bruce Noble and ask to see the documents and the copy of the
wiretape tape I sent them before I compel you to argue about them with
me. There is another fella running around Fredericton with the same
stuff. His name is Vaughn Barnett. If the politicians won't talk to
you, maybe he will. his number is 457-4559 But he is likely out in the
front yard protesting something. I don't trust him either because he
and Charles Leblanc are buddies and I know he is a liar.

Cya'll in Court
David R. Amos
# posted by  Anonymous : 1:21 PM

I still can't understand what this guy is trying to say. His
posts/letters or whatever are WAYYYYYY too long! I still have no idea
what his beef is or who it's with.
# posted by  Anonymous : 2:52 PM

I sent the email I promised I would to Chucky and many of his buddies.
I will forward it on to anyone else. All you have to do is ask. Again
my email address motomaniac_02186 (at) yahoo.com

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
# posted by  Anonymous : 2:59 PM

My beef is what all politicians talk about but do nothing about
because they are the ones who practice it. In a nutshell it is called
Public Corruption Get it? If not so be it. I have said enough for now.
Dave
# posted by  Anonymous : 3:03 PM

All I know is that David and Chucky make great friends. They are
heavenly made couple. They think alike and behave alike.
Only difference is that David rights a little better English when Chucky sucks.
# posted by  Anonymous : 3:27 PM

rights???????
# posted by  Charles LeBlanc : 4:03 PM

Ok "writes" smart a**.
# posted by  Anonymous : 4:55 PM

Charlie you've been leaving comments since someone above asked you
what papers you were supposed to deliver to brad green for this guy?
and #2 why didn't you complete the task?
# posted by  Anonymous : 6:03 PM

Thanks for asking that question again but rest assured Chucky will
never answer it?
Dave
# posted by  Anonymous : 7:25 PM

> HELL ANGELS FROM MONTREAL LOOKING FOR CHARLES
> LEBLANC????
> by Charles LeBlanc Saturday, Jun. 12, 2004 at 11:26
> AM
> oldmaison@yahoo.com Fredericton
> Thursday morning, I showed up at the Legislature to
> use the computer at the Library.
> I was told by security that two rough looking
> individuals walked through the doors and asked for a
> Charles Leblanc?
> They described the guys as rough looking and one of
> them had a long gray beard with a leather jacket!
> At first, I believe it was the Hell Angels coming
> down from Montreal for a hit on Charles.
> Hours later, I seen my bigot buddy Matthew Glenn and
> he was in front of the Legislature with his
> blowhorn.
> For you people who don’t know the bigot? He’s the
> one who started the Anglo Society. I seen him
> preaching to three young kids and of course I butt
> in and said - Hey Bigot??? Why don’t you bigot go
> home?
> Minutes later, we were approached by two guys and
> they asked politely –Where can we locate a Charles
> LeBlanc???
> In a matter of seconds, the bigot quickly pointed at
> me.
> I said to myself - Ohhh?? Thanks a lot Bigot!!!
> At the end? It was a guy named David Amos and I
> guess that he’s running at an independent in the
> riding of Fundy Royal. The guy have been living in
> the area of Boston and he's been following my
> updates on the internet. I'm telling you that the
> information highway is a great way to spread the
> message to the rest of the world!
> We talked for around 30 minutes and it was nice to
> see the bigot, me and David Amos together debating
> our own little concern issue. We all have our own
> issues and it’s too bad that we cannot unite and
> fight but that’s the way Canadians do things.
> They remind silent until the Government really
> pissed them all and go out and vote the party in
> power out of office
# posted by  Anonymous : 7:40 PM

From: charles leblanc
Subject: Re: This is David Amos
To: moto maniac

I don't know what you're talking about but I gace your
info to Vaughn...Maybe he can explain to me what your
papers are all about...lol


--- moto maniac wrote:

> Hey Charles
> I just found out a simple truth about you. You
> are a liar. Not only did you not give my stuff to
> Brad Green as you promised. You did not give it to
> the man from Minto that you enjoy calling a bigot. I
> just had a little talk with him and he affrimed what
> I had suspected about you and denied receiving the
> documents etc. from you as you claimed.
> Perhaps you should get honest and give the
> stuff to Vaughn Barnett. (I just called him 506
> 457-4559 and left him a message to assure him that I
> am sincere and this is not spam I have not been to
> Fredericton lately but I plan to come soon if you
> don't give him the documents and CD I will) I am
> certain he will understand them and know what to do
> with them. Rest assured that I will tell him you
> have them. (In fact I just did didn't I) You can
> explain your own actions to your friends. I
> understand you well enough already.
> I always suspected that you were all about
> Charles LeBlanc and in the self promotion game. But
> I thought you may at least be ethical. Turns out you
> are just a liar and a chickenshit like all the rest.
> By the way I did figure out who threw me out of the
> legislature it was a french fella by the name of
> Dan. I have no idea why he would claim that his name
> was Jean Claude but it does explain to me why he did
> not show me his ID. I ain't no Hells Angel as you
> and the fellas in the legislature like to claim that
> I am. However I am a plenty pissed off boy from
> Dorchester who just had another French asshole show
> me his ass. Ask me why I am not surprised? Don't you
> think I asked around about you? Never forget you
> were raised just up the road from me. I told you
> that out of the gate when I first called you from
> Boston. Remember? That should have been a little
> clue to you. You should have done the same before
> slandering me and adding to the offense by proving
> to me that you are a liar. I
> gave you the benefit of my doubt but you proved for
> me once more first impressions are seldom wrong. I
> have now thrown you in the same boat with your
> frienf the Sergeant at Arms(Even that has acquired a
> french spelling for an English Queen) I don't hate
> french folks but I do find french bullshit very
> contemptable. I have many Cajun friends that share
> the same opinion about french Canadians. In fact I
> was the first Canadian that a lot of them ever met
> that they actually saw eye to eye with. We quickly
> put the english/french stuff in the proper corner
> and went on with our pursuit of happiness We just
> laughed at your snotty attitudes about culture.
> everybody knows it ain't about that at all. It is
> about money and power as usual. Wave all the flags
> you want, you can't fool me. I am too stupid. What
> you and all my other fellow maritmers seem to be
> overlooking is that while we can't see the forest
> for the trees because of our petty squabbles, the
> evil Global dudes have been raping our
> forest primeval. They playing us like a fiddle
> while you dance their jig out of your own self
> interest. Do you want a job in the media or do you
> wish to be like Michael Moore and become famous
> byway of notoriety? Do you really think anyone in
> the media owned by the rich and powerful takes you
> seriously? Can anyone take you seriously once they
> find you to be a liar? At least I do what I say and
> say what I mean. What say you now Chucky Baby?
> Better yet wait until I turn up and say it to me in
> front of your friends. Premier Lord know I love to
> argue with Frenchmen we can talk about it on his
> front lawn. You buddy Dan and the CISNB can listen
> in.
> The following are your words about me. I find
> that you are so full of yourself it is ridculous
> particularly in light of the fact that I consider
> you to be full of shit. Watch how easily I prove
> that fact about you the next time I am in
> Fredericton. Which maybe sooner that you think. Rest
> arrured I will be telling your friends what I think
> of you. Feel free to argue with me. It should prove
> interesting to see who they believe.
> David R.
> Amos
> 506
> 434-1379
# posted by  Anonymous : 7:44 PM

Vaughn did you get my material as Leblanc claims? You are the third
guy he says he gave it to. If not I know I will be the last. I have
had enough of him and his funny ways at my expense. He whined and
complained that he had no computer so I gave him one. But he failed to
even say Thanks. Now the liar wants people to buy him a Bull Horn so
he can bother more people with his Bullshit. Well Fredericton has
already met a real legal and social activist and i did it all without
a whisper or any press coverage. Soon Ottawa will receive the same
stuff and much much more before I return to the USA to argue the
bastards pulling the strings up here in our old houses. The folks
working there seem to care more what language the liars are speaking
in rather than what they are actually saying. Charles LeBlanc spoke
with a forked tongue when he claimed his Scottish heritage. He made my
blood boil and my ancestors bones rattle when he went on and on about
his roots. First the frenchy wants his flag on the government houses
then he wants to wave it wearing our kilts? I am of the Keith Clan and
founded my own. My ancestors were fine and noble warriors. Read their
motto on the beer bottle Chucky and tell me if you believe it or not.
Rest assured I do. Neither my Septs nor I would accept such a man as
Charles Leblanc as a trusted friend.
# posted by  Anonymous : 7:45 PM

David,

Yes, Charles gave me the material - although I must admit that I was
not able to make much sense of it. Because of that, and because it
appears to be out of my area of expertise, I doubt that I can help you
very much. Also, unfortunately, your clash with Charles, and your low
opinion of him (which I feel is unwarranted) has created a conflict of
interests, as Charles is a friend of mine and a fellow activist. Since
I doubt I can assist you much anyway, perhaps that doesn't matter. In
any event, good luck with your cause.

Vaughn
# posted by  Anonymous : 7:47 PM

Chucky finally met his match in David Amos. Chucky deserves it. He
messes with good people. Someone is speaking out.
# posted by  Anonymous : 8:09 PM

I must admit that you have lots of guts to condenm me in my blog site.

Anyway? I tried to read those papers and I can honestly say that I
don't uderstand what your battle is all about?

I never told you that I would give those papers to any MLA's. Why the
hell do I want to be involded in your issues anyway.

I got enough on my own plate.

Ok...you got a little blog because a good supporter of this blog asked
me to let you post your views.

Don't blow it!!!!

Is you wish to smear and used bad words? I'll delete the whole blog.

Try to be nice. Not too many websites allowso you to post your views
so be nice in here.....

Watch the language....is not??? Well? Why don't you start a new blog????

Is easy to do.....

I really don't understand your point of view.

All the activists are trying to bring important issues to the public
and you wish to condenm the same people.

Why burn all those bridges?

Oh well c'est la vie.....
# posted by  Charles LeBlanc : 8:46 PM


Lets get this straight Chucky so there is no misunderstanding. You
only allowed my words to stand this time around because other people
read them and asked you to? Hmmm some ethics EH?

As for guts not only is my belly bigger than you my balls are as big
as basketballs compared to yours. I ain't afraid of Count Peter Hans
Klovenbach so why would I be afraid of you? You and your wannbe lawyer
friend know full well I have been trying to impeach George W. Bush
byway of the courts since 2002. Long before that nonsense in Iraq
began. You hate me because if you had even glanced at the papers you
just confessed you read then you know I sued Cardinal Law and caused
him to quit his job on Dec 13th, 2002. It had nothing to do with child
abuse like the media claims. It was merely filthy lucre that is all.
Well my wife's cousin the exbanker turned priest Robert T. Kickham is
still around around and cooking the books for the brand new Cardinal
in Beantown. You know the dude in named O'Malley.

Furthmore Chucky you offer no argument to anything I state other than
lie about not promising to serve Brad Green or falsely claiming that
the computer I gave you was no good? The best you can is make jokes or
critize my choice of words whilst I point out your serious lack of
integrity?

In my law books it is not illegal to have poor manners or use the
words I have employed thus far(as of yet anyway) I believe it falls
under something that can be found in the Charter

However to slander someone and tell ouright lies about them for one's
own gain is more than offensive. I have been falsely imprisoned
because of the perjury of people like you who choose to support public
corruption for their own gain. Methinks I should seek relief in court
in fredericton particularly when I can prove it. Furthermore you know
you have told several lies within the very blog.

I will wager if I posted something that you can never refute this blog
will evporate immediately. Perhaps I should seal its fate and let your
friends wonder why you erased me so quickly after I busted you in
front of everybody. Never fear though I saved this blog in its
entirety already. However you really should check you email and press
print on the tif file that I just sent you and yoy hard copy of the
proof that I keep wonderful records. Some of your buddies and
adversaries may be reading it already. At the end of the day you may
realize that I just may turn out to be the honest man that you ever
met.
# posted by  Anonymous : 9:11 PM

I give up....I'm just going to continue bloggling away.....Bonne Chance...
# posted by  Charles LeBlanc : 9:27 PM

Don't you think you should hire a lawyer too? That last email was hell
in a hand basket wasn't it? Why not call Cleveland Allaby (your know
Tanker's lawyer) he hates both Bernie Lord and me but he won't demand
any sort of apology from me. Hell he won't even whisper my name. Just
maybe Cleveland Allaby will help Vaughn and you to understand my
material and then ask you two dudes why you didn't call the RCMP years
ago. Yea I know I am pipe dreaming. Honest cops and lawyers don't
exist. That is pure Hollywood all the way and a long long way from the
Maritimes EH? Ask my Newfy buddy Byron Prior how bad things really are
around here. I Double Dog Dare Ya too Chucky.
Que Sera Sera and
Cya'll in Court
David Raymond Amos
# posted by  Anonymous : 9:42 PM

Chucky giving advice to David Amos to not burn bridges? That is funny.
Chucky is good at burning bridges himself. He has no bridge left to
burn. How can give advice to others to not do the same.
# posted by  Anonymous : 8:04 AM

Subject: Fwd: Sue me Eddy Baby I double Dog Dare Ya I telling Lord Black on you


Everybody loves a mystery. A lot of folks were no doubt wondering why
the big talking old fart named Petey Newman apologized to Lord Conrad
Black not long after he and Mikey Levine laughed off his lawsuit at
the big party in Toronto. Didn't it seem strange to anyone that the
Tory's law firm wrote the crooked old Lord a fat cheque as well? It
seems that the Torys, a dude named Mr. Moate, Levine, Greenspan,
Newman and I may be the only ones to know the true reason why and I am
the only one who will tell the tale. Here is your clue see if you can
figure it out. I know of two Maritimers who will never have a hope in
hell of figuring it out because they do not have two clues between
them and if the did they would not know what to do with them. One dude
everybody calls Tanker and the other I call Frenchie. They know who
they are do you
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
# posted by  Anonymous : 11:02 AM

Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 06:36:11 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos
To: Eddy Greenspan
Subject: Sue me Eddy Baby I double Dog Dare Ya I telling Lord Black on you

Say hey to your buddies the old fart Peter C. Newman and and the
corrupt Yankee FitzGerald for me will ya?

"Edward L. Greenspan, Q.C." wrote:

Subject: RE: Since Susan Prosnitz and her boss Fynn would not answer Hard Copy
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 08:10:13 -0500
From: "Edward L. Greenspan, Q.C." To: "David Amos"

Please delete my name from your emails

Greenspan, White
144 King Street East
Toronto, Ontario M5C 1G8
Tel: 416-366-3961
Fax: 416-366-7994
# posted by  Anonymous : 11:11 AM

Subject: RE: Sue me Eddy Baby I double Dog Dare Ya I telling Lord Black on you

"Cleveland J. Allaby" wrote:

Please do not email, write, copy or send anything to me in the future.
# posted by  Anonymous : 11:14 AM

Bingo You Mr. Cleveland Allaby win the cake baked by Bernie Lord.

Cya'll in Court . Thanks for finally responding to me. Your timing is
perfect. One hour before or so before the 39th Parliament begins and
just in time before I polish off my first complaint to file in Federal
court in Fredericton. Was it done so quickly after I blogged my letter
to you in Chucky LeBlanc's web page? Did the gossip about my blogging
in his website reach you first thing this morning? In my book you are
as dumb as the Frenchie is. Wise or dumb I will call you as a witness
to testify in Federal Court before I get around to suing you. Perhaps
your lawyer and I should talk now. Hostile or not you will make an
important witness not only on because of your lawsuits concernining
Native Aboriginal matters (Remember Barry Bachrach represents me in
the USA right now) but more importantly because Bernie Lord paid you a
lot of money years ago to study the Justice Dept. (Wasn't it 112,000
grand or so?)
Obviously Cleveland you are no wiser than Eddy Greenspan. Clearly you
think your status as a well known lawyer allows you not only to ignore
and not uphold the law but break it if you wish. Should you have
contacted the RCMP as soon as you listened the the CD I provided you
with. Guess what I told them you got it already. My next calls are to
the General Counsel of the SIRC and the old lawyer who represent the
following folks. He has played dumb with me for way past to long.

THE CANADIAN CIVIL LIBERTIES ASSOCIATION
A. ALAN BOROVOY, GENERAL COUNSEL
Suite 200, 394 Bloor Street West
Toronto, Ontario M5S 1X4
phone: 416-363-0321
fax: 416-861-1291

Cleveland did you really think your email will scare me off? Look how
fast I bounced it back and forwarded it to many others. When a man has
been diligently attempting to impeach George W. Bush for over three
years despite the attacks from crooked Feds etc nothing scares him
anymore. A threat of litigation coming from the email box of a lawyer
into mine is like manna from heaven to me. Didn't I slam Eddy
Greenspan the same way? Man you are dumb if you though that I would
not do the same thing with you. You just proved for me that every body
else got my email and hard copy too. you asgin the same question I
asked you on February 23rd. Whois your god damned lawyer maybe I know
him already. If not tell him he has a fool for a client. Will ya?

Tell me honestly, Cleveland if you can find it in your your soul to do
so. Why Didn't you sue Bernie Lord as you threatened to do
particularly after you and I talked the day before I gave my material
to your buddy Tom Young and the New Brunswick Securities Commission? I
heard of no apology from him and I laughed when I saw Tanker being
trundled down to the Speakers chair arm in arm with two crooks. I
figured another backroom deal went down and Tanker needed a smarter
lawyer because I had heard nothing from you and I made certain that
you knew the score with Hard Copy of my material before that shit went
down. Something definitely smells rotten in New Brunswick EH?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

The question still remains who is the April Fool and will Chucky evict
me for Blogging?

chucky leblanc wrote:

You can add this note to all the millions of other
notes but I feel that I have to send ya this note.

We allowed you to have your own little blog. I believe
it's a good way for you to spread your message.

I'm still trying to figure out exactly what the
message is???...lol

Anyway, there's no need to condenm the people who are
activists like Vaugh.

I believe it attracts new visitors that search the
names you mention.

But once that blog is delete? It's too fini.

I too had problems at the Legislature and it's in
front of the Human Rights Commission.

It takes time.....

All I'm asking is that you try to be nice and don't
condenm people like Vaugh who an activist also.

Just try to be nice.....

Lets try to spread our message in a nice way!

What do you think???
# posted by  Anonymous : 11:20 AM

What, specifically, are all these people being sued for? You rant and
rave and nobody can make heads or tails out of what you are talking
about.

We know you ran for office. We know that you try to impeach Bush (and
anybody who does that certainly gets good marks from me!) We know that
for some reason they held you in jail? Is that correct?

I'm assuming its under the new terrorism laws, since you say they
wouldn't let you see evidence. That also is not surprising the way the
US is functioning.

But what are all the lawsuits about? There is something about wiretap
evidence that for some reason you are sending to canadian politicians
and lawyers..why is that?

What exactly are all these law firms doing? If they are crooked, then
specifically what evidence do you have? That lawyers are crooks also
doesn't surprise most people, I"m mostly surprised we continue to
elect so many of them.

But if you could explain point by point what the grievances are
against these people, then people may understand. Perhaps you don't
care and just want to let off steam, that's fine too, that's what
blogs are for. However, many people would like to know what you are
suing these people for?
# posted by  Anonymous : 12:37 PM

Good day to ye with no name. thanks for the question. Methinks by your
questions you must be Vaughn.I stated the reason for my first lawsuit
clearly live on CTV news to that Murphy character at suppertime just
before I was allowed to debate Andy Scot in Oromocto.
My first lawsuit will be to seek relief for the offense against my
rights under the Charter because I was falsely imprisoned without
being charged, held without bail and it was all done without even
being read my rights. Then I was denied my right to a trial after met
the Canadian Consulate in jailand came screaming out. I had tried to
remove the matter to the proper jurisdiction and venue in order to
prove the malicious prosecution to no avail. the bastarsds in the USA
will never give a jury of my peers and Federal Court in Canada does
not employ a jury. Thus I must make my issues well known locally
before I file so that the Judges will not dismiss my complaints so
easily as they have done in the past. Give me a call if you are not
Vaughn and I will meet you show you the evidence.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
P.S. My next posting is quite a rant. I explain things in greater
detail to say the least but my manners are slipping fast. It will be
the maximum stress test of Chucky's newfound sense of ethics.
# posted by  Anonymous : 1:17 PM

So you are suing the canadian government for being held in jail in the
US? Is that right, or were you held in Canada? How does that even
work?

Why go on a lengthy rant to 'test' Charles? Take a break if your
manners are slipping. Having your messages deleted on the last place
your story can be told hardly seems helpful.

"Then I was denied my right to a trial after met the Canadian
Consulate in jailand came screaming out"

That makes no sense whatsoever. People don't need long rants, they
need clarity. You are suing the canadian government because they
refused to help you while in US custody, is that correct?
# posted by  Anonymous : 1:43 PM

Bingo. Vaughn
# posted by  Anonymous : 1:57 PM

Wouldn't it be funny if you are not Vaughn but actually Clevelans
Allaby or Bras Green or Jeff Mockler or beter yet David Lutz or
Vaughn's buddy Brucy Baby Noble. that can't be though because Vaughn
must be Chucky's only legal minded friend
# posted by  Anonymous : 2:00 PM

I am typing to fast because I am upt to something far more important
right now involving J. Division. Mean old Zach's old stomping grounds.
# posted by  Anonymous : 2:03 PM

You know what? I am am gonna take you advice and take a break from
Chucky's little sideshow and go downtown to see what condition my
condition is in Fredericton. I will be the ugly guy grinning and
smoking a lot but not saying a damned think. From now on i want
everything i say recorded. One must do such things when one sues the
Crown.
EH Vaughn?
# posted by  Anonymous : 2:09 PM

Well, that makes some sense anyway. So how are these New Brunswick
lawyers involved? Are you saying that none of them will represent you
or what? You are sending them this wiretap evidence for what reason?
If it's federal court why are you even in New Brunswick, all the
lawyers in this province are idiots and irving lackeys. Why not go to
Toronto where there are at least some civil liberties lawyers.

The trouble is, I don't know of any legal grounds that 'forces' the
canadian government to intervene in a foreign country's legal system.
If somebody plants coke on you in columbia and you get caught, then
plead with canada to help you out, you'll be out of luck.

Under the charter canadians have fewer rights than americans. Our
'terror laws' are the mirror image of the US's, but never even had
moranda rights or anything ike that. In Canada, you are simply f&&&&&
if you cross the state, as any native, environmentalist, protestor, or
civil rights attorney will tell you.

I don't know of a single case where somebody successfully sued, even
David Milgaard was given a settlement since it was dragging out so
long. Natives have tried suing for years.

However, it's easy to talk from the outside. But if Ernst Zundel
couldn't sue for being held for almost a decade with no charges
against him in Canada, I don't see how far a lawsuit against Canada
for not intervening in a foreign country will go.
# posted by  Anonymous : 2:15 PM

Civil rights? Where do you think you ar?? Lok at th e blog. A woman
can't panhandel to make life a little bettre. Boarding house residents
can't do anything. This was a joke, but if that owner wanted to, he
could toss Charles for just that reason. Hell, owners could show up at
their apartments and tell them they want a blowjob, any body who said
no would be told to get out. Welcome to New Brunswick.
# posted by  Anonymous : 2:53 PM

I am back in more ways than one.
It is half past quitting time and all the corrupt politicians are out
getting drunk or laid or both. Tis time for bloggers to come out and
play maybe with luck what the smiling bastards read in the morning
will give a few of them a stroke and Lord can call some more snap by
elections EH?
"Welcome to New Brunswick?" Jeez I was born and raised here i have
lived here for over forty years of my life. I am older than Chucky and
lived just down the road from where he was brought up in Dorchester
NB. I went to High School and UNB in Fredericton when most of the
snots that are screwing us did. Why do you think I am so pissed off?
You don't think I know the score. If someone claims that I am a Yankee
again I think I may hunt them down. If because a man lives somewhere
else for awhile makes him a man of that place then how come a Newfy is
always a Newfy everywhere he goes.
Here is a God's moment for Chucky:
Wht did God tell the Newfys?
Play dumb til I get back Will ya?
that joke seems to hold true here to. since I left the room nothing
further was said. How come. cat got you tongue chucky or could it be
the emails I sent ya?
Love and Kisses
Dave
# posted by  Anonymous : 6:52 PM

Can ya tell I am fishing?
If you speak of the devil he is sure to appear particularly when you
jerk his chain and piss him off.
Dave again
# posted by  Anonymous : 6:55 PM

Nobody called you a yankee, but starting threatening people is sure to
get you deleted, as well as guaranteeing no court in the country will
give you the time of day except to prosecute. As was said, there is
virtually zero chance of suing the government for your claim. At least
Charles is being constructive and taking it to the human rights people
and doing his part to get more rights for new brunswickers. But good
luck getting to court.
# posted by  Anonymous : 7:25 PM

I see that you are watching Vaughn. Spoken just like a lawyer you wish
to be. "Hunt you down" is an expression. But it brought you out of the
woods didn't it. Perhaps you should read your next email real slow.
Before I go I must ask you are you trying to intimadate me by making
false allegations against me?
Love and Kisses
Dave
(hows that for nice Chucky?)
# posted by  Anonymous : 7:34 PM

"As was said, there is virtually zero chance of suing the government
for your claim."
Hmm maybe I will ask Vaughn under oath in court someday why he has
formed that opinion of my pending lawsuit. Clearly he knows more of my
matters than what I or Chucky have given him. I am still human don't
you know. Fredericton does not have the only courts in this old World.
I except them crooked judges here to try hard to dismiss my matters.
Why to you think I am raising hell first. If anyone should understand
what I am up to it is an actvist.
Love and Kisses
Dave
# posted by  Anonymous : 7:48 PM

You certainly ain't Bruce Noble because he represents the Fredericton
PD if you choose to send them to hassle me. He already know I have a
few bones to pick with him in court. I would welcome more false
charges. Here is the obvious question. Are you Chucky's buddy Vaughn
or are you not? If not who are you?
Love and Kisses
Dave
# posted by  Anonymous : 7:53 PM

Thirty minutes have passed and still no comment. Come on now the email
was not all that long Vaughn.
Love and Kisses
Dave
# posted by  Anonymous : 8:02 PM

I have noticed that Chucky hit counter has picked up a little speed.
His count is starting to appraoch Byron Prior's website. Here it is if
anybody cares. I know I do. Byron is human too and he has been far
more offended than Chucky ever was.

http://maxpages.com/sexualabuse

I was bored waiting and check to see if it clicked over a big
milestone for him.

80 grand was how many viewers he had when the MP Billy Matthews
intmadted him into taking it down.

Chucky is appraoching that number for the first time. this is Byron
second kick at the can of worms of injustice.

Love and Kisses
Dave
# posted by  Anonymous : 8:10 PM

Tick tick tick Methinks when the count get to 100 I will evict myself
before I get the bum's rush. It is getting kinda boring here anyway. I
wil just safe the posts and go about my evening knowing nobody will
miss me here.
Hell I was even being kinda sorta nice:)
Love and Kisses
Dave
# posted by  Anonymous : 8:16 PM

Your silence is deafening Vaughn i must be coorect at you or are you
to busy trying to revive Chucky with mouth to mouth. Did I give you
two too much information in the last email and it overloaded you
little minds? What gives Chuckys other blogs barely have any comments
at all he can't be that busy. I will leave the comment after 99 for
Chucky to fill in or delete. He always likes to have the last word.
EH? I will post this look for a comment and then be gone to leave you
to wonder when and where we will cross paths again.
Love and Kisses
Dave
# posted by  Anonymous : 8:38 PM

Now I don't even make sense to myself. I will consider myself evicted
and save the blog in its entirety to argue about later.
Cya'll in court or in Hell.
C'est la meme chose n'est pas?
Bon nuit ma petite chou chous.
(Aren't I nice)

Veritias Vincit
(check the Keiths beer bottle)
David Raymond Amos
# posted by  Anonymous : 8:48 PM

I don't know who Vaughn is, I was interested in the story because I
couldn't decide whether you were crazy or just very angry. I still
don't know.

I know there are constructive uses for anger, Charles has accomplished
quite a bit with his. I'd hate to see ANYBODY spend all that time and
energy in a fruitless cause such as trying to sue the government. The
mention of being an 'activist' was heartening. Charles has been an
activist and he and Tim Smith have almost single handedly got the
rights of tenants on the map, and soon an injustice there 'may' be
rectified, one that is a hundred years overdue.

Yet he and Tim accomplished it in less than two months, albeit with
the help of a byelection.

Being imprisoned in the states is no crime in my book, their entire
federal system is an illegal entity. Manlin Chee has been a public
defender for over twenty years, won many awards, and now sits in jail
because she sat on a panel that argued against the patriot act. While
Canada isn't MUCH better, it is SOME better.

But like I said, the courts will give no recourse, as the courts have
clearly stated that Canada's own terrorist act does not infringe on
civil liberties. Anybody who thinks highly of civil liberties in
Canada just needs to remember Oka, or Quebec, where thousands of
french were rounded up without charge just so Trudeau could pretend to
be macho.


There are lots of organizations that are attacking these things, and
personally I think its a shame that those who have virtually identical
claims against the government can't seem to get along. If there were a
dozen Charles Leblanc's in the province we could literally turn the
province upside down. YOu seem to have the passion, but maybe a little
too much, as often you are incomprehensible. That's unfortunate
because those who are victims of the aggression of the state are those
whose stories most deserve to be heard.

Just a recommendation, but when you mentioned all those lawyers then
you definitely got my interest. These guys work in a shroud of secrecy
and somebody with the guts to air their dirty laundry would definitely
accomplish more good with political activism than with lawsuits.
Courts were designed to put undesirables in jail, not mete out
justice. Hell, New Brunswick doesn't even allow class action lawsuits!

I don't always agree with Charles, and often his views and how he
states them make me cringe, but I'm glad that he does what he does,
and NB is a province that NEEDS more 'activism'. I'd just suggest
doing it in a way that's guaranteed to get the most results. But
that's just my opinion-not Vaughns.
# posted by  Anonymous : 10:50 PM

What planet in cyber space are you from oh yet with noname who claims
not to be Vaughn? The first thing you should do when you touch down on
mother earth is get a name. Then learn to read BEFORE you write. I
ain't no god damned activist. GET IT? However I am a very fierce
political animal. GET IT? I am just a very pissed off Maritimer with
way bigger balls than you.

Some activist you are with only half a mind to say something like this
to me. Go to jail sometime in Yankee Doodleland and then come back
home and tell me that crap again.
"Being imprisoned in the states is no crime in my book,"

After you figure out the nonsense that you just wrote in support of a
liar. Why not get an email account and a telephone too and learn how
to use them BEFORE you attack a man who understands more about what
you are yapping about than you could ever dream. I have no doubt that
you are clever and you may be well on your way to being just another
lawyer but you cannot learn to be ethical in any law school. You must
be born with the genes. It seems that you and Chucky are a couple
bricks shy of that load.

On the other hand in reading some of your words about what Chucky has
done I think you may be the political science student at the homeless
shelter that the lady that was on Tom Young's show spoke of when I
called her afterwards. Either way I don't care. i don't want to know
you.
Ask you buddy Chucky sometime to share his emails from me with you if
you are truly are not his buddy Vaughn. Better yet go on a mission
with your mouse and go through Chuckys many blogs and figure out who
he is for yourself. Then ask Vaughn if you can view the hard copy of
the material he admited having BEFORE I was falsely imprisoned in
2004. Activists have a lot to learn about listening to folks before
there is trouble. It seems they allow things to happen just so they
can protest about it later. I was challenging the FBI etc and arguing
crooked US Attorneys about other matters in Federal Court in Boston
months before that nonsense in Iraq began. whereas you seem to have a
love of lucre Vaughn should tell ya that in two matters I was awarded
judgements by default for 32 million bucks and I laughed and told them
to shove it up their arse because the judgement came from the wrong
court. It is all about jurisdiction venue and justice. I cannot demand
integrity of others without proving my own first. When the crooked
lawyers filed motions to remove the defaults and file their answers
late I did not oppose them. It so shocked the hell out of the Yankee
bastards they were not long sending the Secret Service to try to take
a man away who would rather argue the awful truth than take a pay off.
In my book false imprisonment is definite illegal and when I look at
your writing and Chuckys I cannot forget what I was taught. There are
NO degrees of honesty either you are or your are NOT. Go kiss Chucky
good night. Will ya? I have had enough of both of you oh ye who may be
Vaughn. I so not feel sorry that I do not believe you.(Damned for a
little Damned for at lot)
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
# posted by  Anonymous : 11:57 PM

One last ting before I sign off that I forgot to say. Yankee lawyers
swear an oath before the Bar before they are allowed to practice law
for a fee. Part of it goes something like this. "I will not delay or
deny any man for lucre or malice" the politicians and lawyers I am
arguing ignore their oath for lucre which far easier to understand
than the malice you and Chucky wish against me. i tried to help Chucky
and even gave him a computer because he whined that he did not have
one. The only thing I asked in return was for him to go to Brad
Green's office and give him a pile of documents and one CD in an
unsealed envelope so that every one could see that there was nothing
harmful inside.The liar claimed many things and slammed me six ways to
Sunday while blocking my protests. I was getting even on April fools
and draging him into a place where most lawyer fear to go. An ethical
argument in public view. Like Tom Young on the radio he keep
threatening to press the delete button when things were not going his
way. Charles Leblanc is all about Charles LeBlanc no less no more.
Veritas Vincit
# posted by  Anonymous : 12:13 AM

1 comment:

  1. Do you need an urgent loan of any kind? Loans to liquidate debts or need to loan to improve your business have you been rejected by any other banks and financial institutions? Do you need a loan or a mortgage? This is the place to look, we are here to solve all your financial problems. We borrow money for the public. Need financial help with a bad credit in need of money. To pay for a commercial investment at a reasonable rate of 3%, let me use this method to inform you that we are providing reliable and helpful assistance and we will be ready to lend you. Contact us today by email: daveloganloanfirm@gmail.com Call/Text: +1(501)800-0690 And whatsapp: +1 (501) 214‑1395

    NEED A LOAN?
    Ask Me.

    ReplyDelete