https://twitter.com/DavidRaymondAm1/with_replies
AJAshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIGNZX9Ahok&t=51s
Commentary Any Medium
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 17:23:37 -0400
Subject: Attn Michael Sylvester I just called again say Hey to Connell
Smith and CBC for me will ya?
To: michael.sylvester@spacex.com, Connell.smith@cbc.ca, washington
field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Robert. Jones"
<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, kim.brisson-st-jean@crtc.gc.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
"hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "sylvie.gadoury"
<sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.
<Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>, "charles.murray" <charles.murray@gnb.ca>,
"Ross.Wetmore" <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "Roger.Brown"
<Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>
https://davidraymondamos3.
Friday, 27 November 2020
Connell Smith Last Yap About Elon Musk's satellites now streaming to
some rural N.B. homes
https://twitter.com/
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
I listened to CBC this morning celebrate Smiths last day and just
shook my head for obvious reasons
Methinks I will send him one last email for equally obvious reasons N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.
#cdnpoli #nbpoli
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
Elon Musk's satellites now streaming to some rural N.B. homes
Public launch of service possible by mid-2021
Connell Smith · CBC News · Posted: Nov 27, 2020 7:00 AM AT
https://davidraymondamos3.
Tuesday, 20 October 2020
Elon Musk's satellite internet plan gets green light from Canadian regulator
https://twitter.com/
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
Methinks Higgy et al should well understand why I gave the Space X
office a call today and left a message for their tax lawyer Michael
Sylvester N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.
#cdnpoli #nbpoli
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
Elon Musk's satellite internet plan gets green light from Canadian regulator
Tesla co-founder's space company plans to launch 12,000 low-orbit
internet satellites
Connell Smith · CBC News · Posted: Oct 20, 2020 8:00 AM AT
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 15:43:16 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE Federal Court File no T-1557-15 and Yankee wiretaps
after I called The Field Units of the FBI in Washington and Boston and
they denied sending me any emails YEA RIGHT Well the FBI and the RCMP
should review paragraphs 39, 53, 55 and 61 of the aforesaid complaint
To: steve.roberge@gnb.ca, tj@burkelaw.ca, kelly@lamrockslaw.com,
carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca, blaine.higgs@gnb.ca,
don.darling@saintjohn.ca, alan.roy@snb.ca, ckdrnews@radioabl.ca,
news@931theborder.ca, news@959sunfm.com, contact@mcgmedia.net,
smstevens@epla.net, info@gg.ca, brian.marlatt@pcparty.org,
mehuenef@gmail.com, joe.hueglin@bellnet.ca, Joe.Hueglin@gmail.com,
tmgarj@telusplanet.net, adamlordon@gmail.com, info@larrylynch.ca,
peggy4mayor@gmail.com, clanthony@mta.ca, johnwforan@yahoo.ca,
a.furlong9@gmail.com, tankert.geo@yahoo.com, kattie@nb.sympatico.ca,
tonyrussell_518@hotmail.com, smithrd@nb.sympatico.ca,
ryansomers@ymail.com, campbellmike229@gmail.com, sfedgett@gmail.com,
roymacmullin2016@gmail.com, paulrichardmoncton@gmail.com,
ASeamans@townofriverview.ca, CCassista@townofriverview.ca,
mayor@moncton.ca, mayor.chorley@townofhampton.ca,
marc.thorne@sussex.ca, bachatt@nbnet.nb.ca, gclark@quispamsis.ca,
kirstinherta@gmail.com, terryk12@nb.sympatico.ca, vop@nbnet.nb.ca,
villra@nbnet.nb.ca, vnorton@nbnet.nb.ca,
mflewwelling@sussexcorner.com, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca,
serge.gauvin@snb.ca, wayne.gallant@nbpolice.ca,
Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Connell.smith@cbc.ca, premier@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca,
leader@greenparty.ca, martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, robert.david.steele.vivas@
jeromecorsi6554@gmail.com, jcomey@law.columbia.edu,
Newsroom@globeandmail.com, Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca, Robert.Jones@cbc.ca
Trust that you will find this email at the bottom of this blog in a hearbeat
https://davidraymondamos3.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
Ex-RCMP boss Wayne Gallant named new chief of Kennebecasis Regional Police Force
Gallant, who was in charge of criminal operations for New Brunswick
RCMP, will replace retiring Steve Palmer
Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon · CBC News · Posted: Nov 02, 2017 9:53 AM AT
The Kennebecasis Regional Police Force has a new chief.
Wayne Gallant, the former RCMP officer in charge of criminal
operations in New Brunswick, was announced Thursday as the new leader
of the force, which covers Rothesay and Quispamsis.
Wayne Gallant, the former chief superintendent of the New Brunswick
RCMP, is taking over as chief of the Kennebecasis Regional Police
Force, effective Nov. 27. (Kennebecasis Regional Police Force)
He will take over Nov. 27, according to a news release issued by the
Kennebecasis Regional Joint Board of Police Commissioners.
"The board is pleased to have attracted a policing leader with such a
breadth of experience," chair Matt Alexander said in an emailed
statement to CBC News.
"Wayne is a highly respected and decorated member of the policing
community and he will be a great asset to the Kennebecasis Valley,"
said Alexander, who is also the deputy mayor of Rothesay.
Gallant will replace Chief Steve Palmer, who is scheduled to retire in
March, after he turns 60.
Kennebecasis police culture must change, chief says
Kennebecasis officer under criminal investigation for alleged
sexual harassment
Kennebecasis Regional Police Force seeks new chief, again
Palmer described Gallant as "an excellent choice."
"I believe he has the knowledge and experience to be a very positive
leader for the organization," which includes 38 officers and five
civilian employees, he said.
'Life-long learner'
Gallant, who left the RCMP in June 2016, has been working with
Fisheries and Oceans Canada as regional director of conservation and
protection for the Gulf region.
He previously served 27 years with the national police force, most
recently as chief superintendent for the province for five years and
the two years prior as superintendent of the Codiac detachment in the
greater Moncton region.
The board's release described Gallant as a "life-long learner who has
embraced new opportunities throughout his career."
He has worked in general duty policing, human resources, major crime
and forensic identification.
Officer probe continues
Gallant takes on his new role with the Kennebecasis Regional Police
Force as one of its senior officers remains under criminal
investigation for alleged intimidation, sexual harassment, obstruction
and mischief involving a female civilian employee.
Insp. Jeff Porter, a 29-year veteran, has been suspended with pay
since June 2016, when the force barred him from having any contact
with the alleged victim, whom he supervised.
None of the allegations against Porter have been proven.
Kennebecasis Regional Police Force Chief Steve Palmer is scheduled to
retire in March, after 34 years with the force. (Kennebecasis Regional
Police Force)
Palmer, who has been with the force since 1983, has only been the
chief for a year.
He was promoted from deputy chief when his predecessor Stephen
McIntyre retired four days after a scathing report said he failed to
properly investigate when the Porter matter when it was brought to his
attention.
The bard of police commissioners posted the chief's position in June.
The board wanted to start the process "well in advance" of Palmer's
retirement, seeking both internal and external candidates from across
Canada, the chair had said.
Palmer will continue in an advisory and support role until his
retirement, while Gallant familiarizes himself with force.
Will pursue partnerships
"Mr. Gallant's philosophy as a police leader is based upon working
with community stakeholders and employees in the pursuit of
organizational excellence that maximizes officer and community
safety," according to the board's release.
"This will be done by engaging the community and working with partners
to advance evidence‐based strategies and fostering a sense of
collective stewardship of the resources available," it said.
Gallant was honoured with the RCMP's exemplary service medal.
He was awarded a the Member of the Order of Merit of Police Officers
by the Governor General of Canada in 2015, received a Queen Elizabeth
II Diamond Jubilee medal in 2012 and a police leadership award for
excellence in organizational innovation from the provincial government
in 2011.
He has a masters and bachelor degree in education and a bachelor of
arts in history.
Gallant has spent the majority of his career in New Brunswick but has
also worked in Ontario, Nova Scotia and Newfoundland.
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices|About CBC News
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
Kennebecasis officer committed 81 breaches of Police Act, independent
report finds
Insp. Jeff Porter to face arbitration hearing Nov. 21 on allegations
involving female civilian employee
Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon · CBC News · Posted: Nov 09, 2018 6:00 AM AT
Insp. Jeff Porter of the Kennebecasis Regional Police Force has been
suspended with pay since June 2016. An inspector's annual salary
ranges from about $104,000 to $115,000. (Facebook)
A senior officer with the Kennebecasis Regional Police Force committed
81 breaches of various sections of the provincial Police Act,
including sexual harassment, abuse of authority, corrupt practice and
discreditable conduct, an independent investigator hired by the New
Brunswick Police Commission has found.
Insp. Jeff Porter, a 30-year veteran of the force that covers Rothesay
and Quispamsis, also committed five violations of internal policies,
including workplace harassment, according to the investigator's report
obtained by CBC News.
Porter, who contends the allegations against him are false, is
scheduled to face a public arbitration hearing with the commission,
the provincial policing oversight body, on Nov. 21 at 2 p.m.
It comes after the parties were unable to reach an agreement on
corrective measures during a private settlement conference last month.
Kennebecasis police culture must change, chief says
Kennebecasis officer under criminal investigation for alleged
sexual harassment
Kennebecasis Regional Police Force suspends officer
The commission has appointed Edmundston-based lawyer Gary McLaughlin
to hear the case. A location has not yet been determined.
Porter was suspended with pay more than two years ago after
accusations he engaged in a series of inappropriate sexual behaviours
involving a female civilian employee he supervised, sources and
documents reveal.
An inspector's salary is more than $100,000 a year. Municipal and
regional forces in New Brunswick cannot suspend an officer without
pay.
Investigator's findings
The commission's investigator, Ottawa-based lawyer Jennifer White,
found Porter violated numerous sections of the Police Act's code of
professional conduct.
White broke down her findings against Porter this way:
Discreditable conduct: 67 counts.
Workplace harassment: six counts.
Neglect of duty: five counts.
Corrupt practice: two counts.
Damage police force property: one count.
Porter also committed police force policy violations, White concluded
in her report, dated June 28. Among them:
Respectful workplace/harassment policy: three counts.
Workplace harassment: one count.
Personal use of police force assets/property and human resources: one count.
No criminal charges
Porter's lawyer, Jamie Eddy, had been 'hopeful' a settlement could be
reached. (Cox & Palmer)
Porter was previously investigated by the New Brunswick RCMP for
alleged intimidation, sexual harassment, obstruction and mischief
involving the woman he remains barred from having any contact with.
No charges were laid.
"The Crown did not approve charges be pursued," confirmed Porter's
lawyer, Jamie Eddy.
"He's relieved on that front that there's no charges, but this whole
process has been extremely stressful, and he has family."
He said Porter had hoped to resolve the matter during the settlement conference.
"My client wants to return to work. That's what his goal is."
Eddy has raised questions about whether the police commission met
deadlines set out in the Police Act and suggested the issue will be
"front and centre" at arbitration.
Under the act, an officer must be served with notice of a settlement
conference within six months of a complaint being filed. Otherwise,
the commission loses jurisdiction and "no further action shall be
taken" against the officer.
Robert Basque, the lawyer representing the alleged victim, has
declined to comment, citing the ongoing proceedings.
Range of possible sanctions
Steve Roberge, executive director of the New Brunswick Police
Commission, could not say how much the Porter investigation has cost
to date but said investigations typically range from about $5,000 to
more than $100,000, depending on their complexity. (CBC)
Steve Roberge, executive director of the New Brunswick Police
Commission, said he cannot comment on the specifics of any particular
case.
But he said settlement conferences are held to "discuss the behaviour
that has been the subject of the complaint and to come to some
resolution through corrective measures."
I will be fighting the false allegations.
- Jeff Porter, suspended police inspector
"When settlement conferences occur, they occur because the
investigation has sustained the allegations."
Sanctions at the settlement stage can range from a verbal reprimand to
dismissal.
At the stage coming up, the arbitrator can either dismiss a matter or
impose one or a combination of the same range of sanctions that apply
at the settlement conference.
Felt threatened, intimidated
Const. Kelley McIntyre, who was awarded officer of the year by the
International Association of Women Police in August 2018, was
described by the association as 'a tenacious investigator often
consulted by other officers when dealing with domestic violence'
cases. (Facebook/Kennebecasis Regional Police Force)
The Porter case dates back to February 2016, when the alleged victim
confided in Const. Kelley McIntyre that she felt threatened and
intimidated by Porter and wanted to quit.
McIntyre told another female officer, who told Steve Palmer, the
deputy chief at the time, who took the information to then-chief
Stephen McIntyre, of no relation to Kelley, and requested the
allegations be investigated.
Four days later, the chief ordered an investigation — not into Porter
but into McIntyre, accusing her of "workplace harassment" for
allegedly "poisoning the work environment" of Porter.
Kelley McIntyre subsequently filed a Police Act complaint against the chief.
"If this was a member of the public, this case would not have been
allowed to be handled this way, based on our own policies and the
women's abuse protocols," McIntyre wrote in her complaint to the
Kennebecasis Regional Joint Board of Police Commissioners, which
governs the force.
"I believe you will find that there are reasonable grounds to
investigate these alleged breaches because they have the effect to
undermine public confidence in the force if they continue to be
ignored," she wrote.
Scathing report on former chief
An independent investigator found the chief committed 23 breaches of
various sections of the police code of conduct by, among other things,
failing "to ensure that the improper or unlawful conduct of Insp.
Porter was not concealed."
McIntyre, the chief, retired in the wake of the scathing report.
In a subsequent interview, he said he had acted without having all the
necessary information.
This past summer, Kelley McIntyre was awarded officer of the year by
the International Association of Women Police, in part because of the
support she provided to a colleague during a "major internal
investigation involving allegations of sexual harassment," according
to media release issued by the association.
McIntyre's "courage to come forward caused her and her family a great
deal of suffering and personal stress, but this did not stop her from
pushing forward and insisting on a proper and professional internal
investigation," said the release, which did not refer to the Porter
case.
New police chief
The current police chief, Wayne Gallant, said he could say little
about the criminal or Police Act investigations into Porter while the
judicial process continues to unfold.
"The RCMP investigation is concluded and there's no charges going to
be laid criminally and I'm sure as you know criminal harassment is one
thing but you know workplace harassment, the thresholds are different,
he said.
"So the police commission is dealing with the workplace allegations of
workplace harassment and that investigation is concluded as well and
we're heading into sort of the next stage."
Chief Wayne Gallant, left, and Deputy Chief Jeff Giggey, right,
recently welcomed recently promoted Inspectors Mary Henderson and
Anika Becker to the force's management team. (Facebook/Kennebecasis
Regional Police Force)
Porter is no longer listed on the force's website but is still an
inspector suspended with pay, Gallant said.
"Nothing has changed in that regard."
In June, Gallant permanently filled two inspector positions by
promoting two women to the management rank — a first in the force's
67-year history.
"I wouldn't read anything more into that other than the fact that I
wanted to have, you know, my leadership team here complete, so that I
could go forward with the agenda that I have," said Gallant.
The force currently has 37 officers, seven of whom are women, and four
female civilian employees.
'No intention of resigning'
The New Brunswick Police Commission only has the authority to
discipline active police officers.
If an officer resigns or retires at any stage of the investigative or
disciplinary process, "they are no longer considered a police officer
and therefore the Police Act no longer applies to them, which means
the proceedings would be halted and annulled," said Roberge.
Porter, who joined the force as a patrol officer in 1988 and rose
through the ranks, being promoted to sergeant of patrol, then major
crime and now inspector of operations, "has no intention of resigning
from the police force," said Eddy, his lawyer.
"I will be fighting the false allegations," Porter said in an emailed statement.
The Police Act states an arbitrator's decision is final, but Roberge
said there have been cases where a decision has been challenged
through judicial review by a Court of Queen's Bench judge.
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
---------- Original message ----------
From: Robert Steele <>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 11:00:45 -0400
Subject: Re: RE Federal Court File no T-1557-15 and Yankee wiretaps
after I called The Field Units of the FBI in Washington and Boston and
they denied sending me any emails YEA RIGHT Well the FBI and the RCMP
should review paragraphs 39, 53, 55 and 61 of the aforesaid complaint
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
REMOVE. All future emails will be dropped to spam.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:51 AM, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
wrote:
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 10:51:16 -0400
Subject: RE Federal Court File no T-1557-15 and Yankee wiretaps after
I called The Field Units of the FBI in Washington and Boston and they
denied sending me any emails YEA RIGHT Well the FBI and the RCMP
should review paragraphs 39, 53, 55 and 61 of the aforesaid complaint
To: washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>,
James.Comey@ic.fbi.gov, Marc.Cappellini@ic.fbi.gov, "mark.vespucci"
<mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov>, bbachrach <bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>,
"Gilles.Blinn" <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
<Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Wayne.Gallant"
<Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "john.warr"
<john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, RBauer <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>,
"Patrick.Fitzgerald" <Patrick.Fitzgerald@skadden.
<gregory.craig@skadden.com>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
"Gilles.Moreau" <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Jonathan.Vance"
<Jonathan.Vance@forces.gc.ca>, "Greta.Bossenmaier"
<Greta.Bossenmaier@cse-cst.gc.
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "Paul.Lynch"
<Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>, sunrayzulu <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>,
"Marianne.Ryan" <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Charmaine.Bulger"
<Charmaine.Bulger@rcmp-grc.gc.
<rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>
Hey
First things first .
Here are two old emails of mine that I posted within the blog of Andre
Murray's about what went down between the lawyer James Comey and the
IRS Special Agent Mark Vespucci and their FBI cohorts and mean old me
beginning in late 2001.
http://thedavidamosrant.
Saturday, 22 June 2013
I must tell all why I am astounded and delighted that Prez Obama would
appoint the crook James Comey of all people to be the boss of the FBI
http://thedavidamosrant.
Wednesday, 16 January 2013
Good evening Special Agent Mark Vespucci Say Hoka Hey to Mr Obama's
lawyer for me will ya???
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
The former US Attorney James Comey (Who received hard copy of my
concerns in 2003) who is now latest boss of the FBI should say Hey his
old buddy Hillary Clinton (she got hard copy of the same stuff plus
more a little later on in 2003) and their latest boss Prez Obama
(Everybody and his dog knows that he has had Hard Copy of my material
since early 2004 CORRECT Bobby Paulson, Petey Baby MacKay, Franky Boy
Mckenna, Gregy Craig, Patty Fitzgerald and Bobby Bauer?)
We should not forget the minor minions called Special Agents such as
Mark Vespucci and lawyers such as Barry Bachrach. I understand that
these sneaky Yankees now work with Marc Cappellini of the FBI in
Beantown EH James.Comey and Bob Paulson?
https://icwatch.wikileaks.org/
DIRECTOR
James B Comey
FBI/DHS
202-324-3444
James.Comey@ic.fbi.gov
FIELD SUPERVISOR
Marc B Cappellini
617-223-6465
Marc.Cappellini@ic.fbi.gov
-----Original Message-----
From: "Washington Field" <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>,
Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2016 5:13 PM
To: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
Subject: RE: Attn Cst Paul Lynch RE Federal Court File no T-1557-15 and your
continued support of Barry Winters and his malevolent cohorts for one year
since you first contacted me.
The FBI Washington Field Office is in receipt of your emails. It is unclear
as to what your complaint is. In order for us to properly assess your
complaint, you will need to provide the following details:
- Your name and contact information
- Full Details about the fraud/crime and a time line of events
- Any bio-data you have on the subject (address, email address, name, etc…)
- Any supporting/collaborating evidence you might have about the
crime/subject
Upon providing the above information, the FBI, depending on the
circumstances, may work with other federal and local agencies to ensure that
the fraud or crime is investigated.
Please also be advised that the Washington Field Office FBI is responsible
for investigating federal violations in the Washington D.C. metropolitan
area, to include areas of Northern Virginia. The FBI has 56 field offices
throughout the United States, with multiple satellite Resident Agencies
covering rural areas related to these 56 field offices. If you know which
state the crime/subject came from, please know that the complaint will be
forwarded to that State’s FBI Field Office. Attached is a link with the
contact information for each Field Office:
http://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/
Thank you for your communication.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 09:38:37 -0400
Subject: RE Julian Assange I just called Embassy of Ecuador in London
again (011 44 20 7584 1367) Perhaps the former FM Ricardo Patino who
is now Minister of Defense will pay attention this time but Yankee
lawyers ain't betting on it EH Ron Klain?
To: embassy@embassyecuador.ca, postur@for.is, khrafnsson
<khrafnsson@gmail.com>, jessica.glenza@theguardian.com,
mark.berman@washpost.com, travis@rawstory.com, birgittaj
<birgittaj@althingi.is>, ron.klain@revolution.com,
liam.stack@nytimes.com, jon.herskovitz@thomsonreuters.
<birgitta@this.is>, birgittajoy <birgittajoy@gmail.com>,
"chineseembassy.ca" <chineseembassy.ca@gmail.com>, eperalta@npr.org,
gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
"john.warr" <john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
tmg@goodrelations.co.uk, dtnews@telegraph.co.uk,
harriet.alexander@telegraph.
Why is Julian Assange still inside the embassy of Ecuador?
More than three years ago WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange fled into
the embassy of Ecuador in London. But why is he there, and will he
ever leave?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/
"WikiLeaks spokesman Kristinn Hrafnsson said that they would not
believe any assurances "short of an open, official, formal
confirmation that the US government is not going to prosecute
WikiLeaks".
Ecuador defense ministry spat ends in shake-up
AFP•March 3, 2016
https://www.yahoo.com/news/
"Ecuador's top diplomat, Ricardo Patino, will take over as defense
minister after the previous chief resigned in a spat over cuts to the
military pension fund by President Rafael Correa, officials said
Thursday.
Patino, a close ally of the leftist president, has held a series of
cabinet posts in his administration, and has been highly visible as
foreign minister for his outspoken defense of Ecuador's decision to
grant exile to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in its London
embassy."
http://www.embassyecuador.ca/
EMBASSY OF ECUADOR IN CANADA
OTTAWA
AMBASSADOR
H.E. Nicolás Trujllo-Newlin
99 Bank Street, Suite 230
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 6B9
Tel: (613) 563 – 8206
(613) 563 – 4286
Fax: (613) 235 – 5776
E-mail: embassy@embassyecuador.ca
Consul Mr. Marcel Gross
2055 Peel, Suite 601
Montreal, Québec
H3A 1V4
Phone number: (514) 874 – 4071
Fax: (514) 874 – 9078
E-mail: info@consecuador-quebec.org
Jurisdiction: Québec, New Brunswick, Nova Scottia, P.E.I, Newfoundland
and Labrador
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:05:47 +0000
>> Subject: Re: Hey Premier Gallant please inform the questionable
>> parliamentarian Birigtta Jonsdottir that although NB is a small "Have
>> Not" province at least we have twice the population of Iceland and
>> that not all of us are as dumb as she and her Prime Minister pretends
>> to be..
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received
>>
>> Kveðja / Best regards
>> Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
>>
>>
>> This is the docket
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>
>> These are digital recordings of the last two hearings
>>
>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>>
>> Jan 11th https://archive.org/details/
>>
>> This me running for a seat in Parliament again while CBC denies it again
>>
>> Fundy Royal, New Brunswick Debate – Federal Elections 2015 - The Local
>> Campaign, Rogers TV
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>>
---------- Original message ----------
From: <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
dudes are way past too late
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
lalanthier@hotmail.com
Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
lalanthier@hotmail.com
To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
Thank you,
Merci ,
http://davidraymondamos3.
83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
five years after he began his bragging:
January 13, 2015
This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
December 8, 2014
Why Canada Stood Tall!
Friday, October 3, 2014
Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
Stupid Justin Trudeau
Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
campaign of 2006.
What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An
ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear
and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,”
or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of
terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states
“moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of
Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an
ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the
Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty
was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the
amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time
denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time
self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of
“world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the
G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious
behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister
Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully
cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits
are not.
Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal
mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the
world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy”
David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security
and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can
and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing
“humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war
criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending
tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
“the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing,
marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian
military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern
equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are
antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five
years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that
won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin
Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not
served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social
democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and
other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet
these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to
other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security,
and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before
shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now
From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and
the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still
alive
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply
to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
>>>>
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the
War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil,
Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.
william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, stoffp1 <stoffp1@parl.gc.ca>,
dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca,
milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca,
sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari
<smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
susan@blueskystrategygroup.com, Don@blueskystrategygroup.com,
eugene@blueskystrategygroup.
Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice" <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin"
<terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower
<whistleblower@ctv.ca>
I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David
Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's
Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on
CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To
be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested
that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise
if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else
about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact that your
old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English
never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is
interesting though
http://www.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/
Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad
Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/
The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a
shy political animal
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
Enjoy Mr Weston
http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/
"But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
including a Canadian general.
That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was
also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
http://baconfat53.blogspot.
"I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
"veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
into the US policy.
At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was
never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
were deployed WMD.
Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
(and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions
are to met before US troop can redeploy? Prime Minister Jean Chretien
and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of
Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them
correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the
George W Bush administration was onerous
American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
....not necessarily in that order. "
You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
http://www.socom.mil/
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
Recorded entry(ies) for T-1557-15
(
Court number information Court Number : T-1557-15
Style of Cause : DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Proceeding Category : Actions Nature : Others - Crown (v. Queen) [Actions]
Type of Action : Ordinary
38 records found for T-1557-15 Doc Date Filed Office Recorded Entry Summary
- 2016-02-25 Ottawa Copy of Notice of Appeal (Appeal Court File No.
A-48-16 ) appealing NOTICE OF CROSS APPEAL filed in Federal Court of
Appeal filed in the Court of Appeal on 12-FEB-2016 on behalf of
Plaintiff placed on file on 25-FEB-2016
- 2016-02-16 Ottawa Copy of Notice of Appeal (Appeal Court File No.
A-48-16 ) appealing Order of Southcott, J. dated 25-JAN-2016 filed in
the Court of Appeal on 04-FEB-2016 on behalf of Plaintiff placed on
file on 16-FEB-2016
- 2016-01-25 Toronto Acknowledgment of Receipt received from Plaintiff
and Defendant via fax transmission confirmation with respect to Order
and Reasons dated 25-JAN-2016 placed on file on 25-JAN-2016
- 2016-01-25 Toronto Certificate of Order certifying that the Court
(Justice Southcott) on 25-JAN-2016 ordered at the end of his Order and
Reasons as follows: "This Court Orders that: 1. the Plaintiff's appeal
is allowed in part; 2. the Order of Prothonotary Morneau dated
12-NOV-2015 is set aside; 3. the claims for relief in the final
paragraph of the Plaintiff's Statement of Claim are struck without
leave to amend, with the exception of the claim for monetary relief
for allegedly being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick
legislature in 2004; 4. the Defendant is at liberty to present a
motion, to be filed within 30 days of the date of this Order or any
decision resulting from any appeal of this Order, arguing which
specific paragraphs of the Statement of Claim should be struck in
order to accord with my decision; 5. the time for the Defendant to
file a Statement of Defence is extended to 30 days from the date of
this Order, the date of any Order resulting from a motion by the
Defendant arguing which specific paragraphs of the Statement of Claim
should be struck in order to accord with my decision, and the date of
any decision resulting from any appea of either such Order; and 6. No
costs are awarded on this motion." placed on file on 25-JAN-2016
20 2016-01-25 Toronto Reasons and Order dated 25-JAN-2016 rendered by
The Honourable Mr. Justice Southcott Matter considered with personal
appearance The Court's decision is with regard to Motion Doc. No. 8
Result: granted in part 2. the Order of Prothonotary Morneau dated
12-NOV-2015 is set aside; 3. claims for relief in final paragraph of
Plaintiff's Statement of claim are struck without leave to amend, ...
4. Defendant is at liberty to present a motion, to be filed within 30
days.. 5. time for Defendant to file a Statement of Defence is
extended to 30 days... 6. No costs are awarde on this motion. **(see
Reasons and Order for complete wording)** Filed on 25-JAN-2016
certified copies sent to parties Interlocutory Decision Copy of
Reasons for Order entered in J. & O. Book, volume 1290 page(s) 470 -
484
- 2016-01-11 Fredericton Receipt for payment audio CD hearing Dec 14,
2015 and Jan 11, 2016. Req.by Roger Richard placed on file on
11-JAN-2016
- 2016-01-11 Fredericton Receipt for payment copy audio CD recording
hearing Jan 11, 2016. Requested by Plaintiff placed on file on
11-JAN-2016
- 2016-01-11 Fredericton Fredericton 11-JAN-2016 BEFORE The Honourable
Mr. Justice Southcott Language: E Before the Court: Motion Doc. No. 8
on behalf of Plaintiff Result of Hearing: Matter reserved held in
Court Duration per day: 11-JAN-2016 from 09:31 to 10:47 Courtroom :
Courtroom No. 1 - Fredericton Court Registrar: Michel Morneault Total
Duration: 1h16min Appearances: David Raymond Amos 902-800-0369
representing the Plaintiff on his own behalf Jill Chisholm
902-426-7570 representing Defendant Comments: DARS Z005130 was used
for the recording of the hearing Minutes of Hearing entered in Vol.
943 page(s) 475 - 477 Abstract of Hearing placed on file
- 2015-12-23 Ottawa Acknowledgment of Receipt received from all
parties with respect to the Order of the Court rendered on December
14, 2015. (via fax) placed on file on 23-DEC-2015
19 2015-12-23 Fredericton Order dated 14-DEC-2015 rendered by The
Honourable Mr. Justice Bell Matter considered with personal appearance
The Court's decision is with regard to Motion Doc. No. 8 Result:
Delivered orally from the Bench on December 14, 2015. As a result of
my recusal, this Court orders that the Administrator of the Court
schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There is no order
as to costs. Filed on 23-DEC-2015 entered in J. & O. Book, volume 1288
page(s) 428 - 430 Interlocutory Decision
- 2015-12-23 Fredericton Correction to General Sitting concerning
Motion Doc. No. 8 Hearing rescheduled from General Sitting at
Fredericton on 14-DEC-2015 to General Sitting at Fredericton on
11-JAN-2016 at 09:30 duration: 2h Language: E Reason for correction:
The presiding Judge recused himself on 14-DEC-2015 sitting
- 2015-12-14 Fredericton Receipt for payment CD audio recording of the
hearing on 14-DEC-2015, req. by Plaintiff placed on file on
14-DEC-2015
- 2015-12-14 Fredericton Fredericton 14-DEC-2015 BEFORE The Honourable
Mr. Justice Bell Language: E Before the Court: Motion Doc. No. 8 on
behalf of Plaintiff Result of Hearing: Matter adjourned sine die held
in Court Duration per day: 14-DEC-2015 from 09:35 to 10:42 Courtroom :
Courtroom No. 1 - Fredericton Court Registrar: Michel Morneault Total
Duration: 1h07min Appearances: David Raymond Amos 902-800-0369
representing on his own behalf Jill Chisholm 902-426-7570 representing
Defendant Comments: Tascam Backup was used for the recording of the
hearing. Plaintiff requested an audio CD of the hearing. Minutes of
Hearing entered in Vol. 943 page(s) 46 - 47 Abstract of Hearing placed
on file
17 2015-12-10 Halifax Solicitor's certificate of service on behalf of
Jill Chisholm confirming service of the Defendant's Motion Record
(Doc.16) upon Plaintiff by courier on 10-DEC-2015 filed on 10-DEC-2015
16 2015-12-10 Halifax Motion Record in response to Motion Doc. No. 8
containing the following original document(s): 14 15 Number of copies
received: 3 on behalf of Defendant filed on 10-DEC-2015
15 2015-12-10 Halifax Written Representations contained within a
Motion Record on behalf of Defendant concerning Motion Doc. No. 8
filed on 10-DEC-2015
14 2015-12-10 Halifax Affidavit of Jill Thomson sworn on 10-DEC-2015
contained within a Motion Record on behalf of Defendant in opposition
to Motion Doc. No. 8 with Exhibits 1 & 2 filed on 10-DEC-2015
13 2015-12-08 Fredericton Affidavit of service of David Raymond Amos
sworn on 08-DEC-2015 on behalf of Plaintiff confirming service of
doc.12 (doc.8,10,11) upon Defendant by Priority next day mail on
08-DEC-2015 filed on 08-DEC-2015
12 2015-12-08 Fredericton Motion Record containing the following
original document(s): 8 10 11 Number of copies received: 3 on behalf
of Plaintiff filed on 08-DEC-2015
11 2015-12-08 Fredericton Written Representations contained within a
Motion Record on behalf of Plaintiff concerning Motion Doc. No. 8
filed on 08-DEC-2015
10 2015-12-08 Fredericton Affidavit of David Raymond Amos sworn on
08-DEC-2015 contained within a Motion Record on behalf of Plaintiff in
support of Motion Doc. No. 8 with Exhibits A & B (Exhibit A is a CD)
filed on 08-DEC-2015
- 2015-11-23 Fredericton Memorandum to file from Michel G. Morneault
dated 23-NOV-2015 a copy of the Notice of Motion filed on November
20th, 2015 appealing the decision of Proth. Morneau dated November
12th, 2015, sent to Mr. Morneau placed on file.
9 2015-11-20 Fredericton Affidavit of service of David Raymond Amos
sworn on 20-NOV-2015 on behalf of Plaintiff confirming service of
doc.8 upon Defendant by mail on 20-NOV-2015 filed on 20-NOV-2015
8 2015-11-20 Fredericton Notice of Motion on behalf of Plaintiff
returnable at General Sitting in Fredericton on 14-DEC-2015 to begin
at 09:30 duration: 2h language: E for an appeal of the decision of
Richard Morneau, Esq., Prothonotary dated 12-NOV-2015 Doc. No. 6 filed
on 20-NOV-2015
- 2015-11-19 Ottawa Letter sent by Registry on 19-NOV-2015 to
Plaintiff providing a certified copy of the order dated 12-NOV-2015 to
the Plaintiff that had previously been faxed to him on 12-NOV-2015 and
19-NOV-2015 Copy placed on file.
- 2015-11-19 Ottawa Confirmation of receipt by fax printout by the
Plaintiff of the Order dated 12-NOV-2015 of Mr. Prothonotary Morneau
placed on file on 19-NOV-2015
- 2015-11-12 Montréal Acknowledgment of Receipt received from parties
with respect to reception of order 6 placed on file on 12-NOV-2015
6 2015-11-12 Montréal Order dated 12-NOV-2015 rendered by Richard
Morneau, Esq., Prothonotary Matter considered without personal
appearance The Court's decision is with regard to Motion in writing
Doc. No. 2 Result: granted Filed on 12-NOV-2015 copies sent to parties
entered in J. & O. Book, volume 1283 page(s) 357 - 359 Interlocutory
Decision
- 2015-11-06 Montréal Communication to the Court from the Registry
dated 06-NOV-2015 re: Notice of Motion (doc. #2) + request for
direction
18 2015-10-26 Fredericton Affidavit of service of David Raymond Amos
sworn on 26-OCT-2015 on behalf of Plaintiff confirming service of
doc.7 upon Defendant by mail on 26-OCT-2015 filed on 26-OCT-2015
7 2015-10-26 Montréal Motion Record in response to Motion Doc. No. 2
Number of copies received: 1 on behalf of Plaintiff (filed as per
order 6; one copy only) filed on 26-OCT-2015
5 2015-10-14 St. John's Solicitor's certificate of service on behalf
of Jill Chisholm confirming service of Doc 4 Motion Record upon
Plaintiff by Courier on 14-OCT-2015 filed on 14-OCT-2015
4 2015-10-14 St. John's Motion Record Number of copies received: 3 on
behalf of Defendant filed on 14-OCT-2015
- 2015-10-14 St. John's Draft Order concerning Motion Doc. No. 2
received on 14-OCT-2015
3 2015-10-14 St. John's Written Representations contained within a
Motion Record on behalf of Defendant concerning Motion Doc. No. 2
filed on 14-OCT-2015
2 2015-10-14 St. John's Notice of Motion contained within a Motion
Record on behalf of Defendant in writing to be dealt with in the
Montréal local office for an Order purusant to Rules 221(1)(a) and (c)
to strike and an order pursuant to Rule 8 extention of time to serve
and file Defence. filed on 14-OCT-2015 Draft Order\\Judgment received.
- 2015-09-16 Fredericton Letter sent by Registry on 16-SEP-2015 to DOJ
Halifax R.133 service letter Copy placed on file.
1 2015-09-16 Fredericton Statement of Claim and 2 cc's filed on
16-SEP-2015 Certified copy(ies)/copy(ies) transmitted to Director of
the Regional Office of the Department of Justice Section 48 - $2.00
The last database update occurred on 2016-07-14 12:09
Top of page
http://thedavidamosrant.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 13:24:50 -0400
Subject: Re: The FSB, Federal Court file no T-1557-15 ,secret oaths to
the British Queen and the evil Feds etc FYI I did call Moody's lawyer
Goggins When he did not pick up I contacted Michael Adler an he did
not return my call.
To: michael.adler@moodys.com, sallilyn.schwartz@moodys.com,
ir@moodys.com, Richard.Cantor@moodys.com, John.Goggins@moodys.com,
caitlin.workman@canada.ca, press@bankofengland.co.uk,
Joe.Perry@fsb.org, embassy.ottawa@mfa.ee, "Dale.Morgan"
<Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "john.warr" <john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Wayne.Gallant" <Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Marc.Litt"
<Marc.Litt@bakermckenzie.com>, Robert_Glauber@harvard.edu,
"PETER.MACKAY" <PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.
<sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, mcu@justice.gc.ca, "bill.pentney"
<bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
"Paul.Lynch" <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>, pol7163
<pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>, patrick_doran1
<patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, "rod.knecht"
<rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>, cps <cps@calgarypolice.ca>, eps
<eps@edmontonpolice.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
b.spurlock@octafinance.com, s.holbrook@octafinance.com, NBInvestigates
<NBInvestigates@cbc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>,
bostncs <bostncs@international.gc.ca>
So before I leave for a little vacation and not be available for
awhile. I will leave you all with some very serious stuff to consider.
Sometimes less is more so this email should prove to the RCMP who will
no doubt wish to harass me some more and all your lawyers that I am
not joking when acting in defense of my Clan. If you don't believe me
ask the Wilson-Raybould and her many minions about my lititigation ask
the Queen of England and I bet ya they will all play as dumb as post
as per their oath to the Queen's Privy Council or the BAR.
Need I say you snobby Yankee lawyers who take the liberty to assume
the title of "Esquire" a joke to mean old me?
I would lay odds that my long dead Loyalist ancesters are rolling in
the their graves in Fundy Royal and laughing at a very simple but oh
so true statement made by a wild child of theirs. FYI your Yankee
Constitution does not recognize titles so you and lord over your
fellow men. Who the Hell are you to call yourselves sons of Lords?
To be fair to the nasy Yankees Politicians who call themselves
Honourable are the biggest jokes of all
Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, P.C., M.P.
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
Parliament Hill:
Telephone: 613-992-1416
Fax: 613-992-1460
Department:
Justice
284 Wellington Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0H8
Telephone: 613-992-4621
TTY: 613-992-4556
Fax: 613-954-0811
E-Mail: mcu@justice.gc.ca
First things first have a Look at the 3 documents hereto attached (Not
a big read)
Listen to these old voicemails from interesting FEDS at about the
same point in time (Won't take long)
http://www.archive.org/
then ask youselves or the lawyers Senator Shelby or Spizter or Cutler
or Bernie madoff's old buddy Robert Glauber where the webcast and
transcript went for a very important hearing held in late 2003 by the
United States Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
http://www.banking.senate.gov/
Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the
Mutual Fund Industry
November 20, 2003 02:00 PM
The Committee will meet in OPEN SESSION to conduct the second in a
series of hearings on the “Review of Current Investigations and
Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry.”
Archived Webcast
Witness Panel 1
Mr. Stephen M. Cutler
Director - Division of Enforcement
Securities and Exchange Commission
cutler.pdf (175.5 KBs)
Mr. Robert Glauber
Chairman and CEO
National Association of Securities Dealers
glauber.pdf (171.1 KBs)
Eliot Spitzer
Attorney General
State of New York
spitzer.pdf (68.2 KBs)
Permalink: http://www.banking.senate.gov/
Trust that the evil women and men that PM Trudeau "The Younger"
appointed to to his cabinet will continue to play dumb because of
their oath to The Privy Council. However it does not follow that
everybody who works for them are dumb and they have no such oath to
uphold N'esy Pas?.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:14:00 -0700
Subject: WikiLeaks' Julian Assange to leave Embassy of Ecuador in
London soon??? Attn Ecuadorian FM Ricardo Patino and Amb Dr. Andres
Teran-Parral I don't think Fernando would disagree when I say this is
NO COINCIDENCE
To: eecucanada@cancilleria.gob.ec, khrafnsson@gmail.com, birgittaj
<birgittaj@althingi.is>, birgittajoy <birgittajoy@gmail.com>,
birgitta@this.is, chinaemb_ca@mfa.gov.cn, embassy@embassyecuador.ca,
ecuador@telus.net, enquiries@canninghouse.org, postur@irr.is,
"calgary.northernhills" <calgary.northernhills@
"calgary.hays" <calgary.hays@assembly.ab.ca>, "calgary.cross"
<calgary.cross@assembly.ab.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.sk.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>,
richardwtc@gmail.com, "rod.knecht" <rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>,
editor@desmogblog.com, chineseembassy.ca@gmail.com, lgunter
<lgunter@shaw.ca>, "joshua.skurnik" <joshua.skurnik@hotmail.com>,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, COCMoncton
<COCMoncton@gmail.com>, dave.peiser@peiserforcongress.
<RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, bginsberg <bginsberg@pattonboggs.com>,
bairdj <bairdj@parl.gc.ca>, chinaconsul_cal_ca@mfa.gov.cn,
"greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>, jack.tomik@cbc.ca,
alan.dark@cbc.ca, Mindy.Qi@nexencnoocltd.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, frankffrost
<frankffrost@hotmail.com>, "john.green" <john.green@gnb.ca>,
"John.Grierson" <John.Grierson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Darren.Woroshelo"
<Darren.Woroshelo@rcmp-grc.gc.
<Rod.Booth@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "craig.callens"
<craig.callens@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "ron.klain"
<ron.klain@revolution.com>, "Geoffrey.McDonald"
<Geoffrey.McDonald@gov.bc.ca>, "dean.buzza"
<dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
http://wikileaks-press.org/
https://twitter.com/
http://www.ricardopatino.com/
http://www.usatoday.com/story/
WikiLeaks' Julian Assange to leave embassy 'soon'
Kim Hjelmgaard, USA TODAY 11:08 a.m. EDT August 18, 2014
LONDON — WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange announced Monday that after
spending two years in the Embassy of Ecuador in London he will "soon"
leave the diplomatic safe harbor.
He made the comments during a joint press conference with Ecuador's
Foreign Minister Ricardo Patino. Assange did not elaborate on the
timing or address whether an impasse over his potential extradition
had been resolved.
It was suggested in the British press over the weekend that Assange
may need hospital treatment for a heart defect and lung condition and
that any move could be to remedy those suspected health problems.
However, Assange refused to be drawn on those specific points Monday,
saying only that when he does leave it will "probably not" be for the
reasons reported on.
WikiLeaks spokesman Kristinn Hrafnsson later clarified Assange's
claim. Hrafnsson said the issue of Assange's extradition must first be
resolved before he can leave.
"The plan is to leave as soon as the U.K. government decides to honor
its obligations," Hrafnsson said, referring to guarantees he is
seeking over the right to travel to Ecuador.
Still, Assange said that his health has suffered as a result of his confinement.
"It's (the embassy) an environment in which any healthy person would
find themselves soon enough with certain difficulties they would have
to manage," Assange said. He said the embassy "has no outside areas,
no sunlight."
Assange, 43, fled to the embassy in 2012 fearing extradition to the
U.S. via Sweden, where authorities want to question him over
allegations related to a sexual assault.
Ecuador has granted him refugee status and says it remains committed
to his protection, but British police have so far refused to let
Assange leave the embassy and it is thought that he would be arrested
if he tried to do so.
In 2010, WikiLeaks published a tranche of leaked military and
diplomatic cables and Assange has been the subject of an investigation
by U.S. authorities.
https://www.facebook.com/
Wikileaks
June 18, 2010 ·
.
Wikileaks' Julian Assange has limited ability to respond to
interviews. Please contact spokespersons below. (now with correction
on Kristinn's email)
Kristinn Hrafnsson
Journalist RUV (Icelandic equivalent to the BBC), one of two
journalists WikiLeaks sent to Baghdad.
Tel:+354 821 7121
Email: khrafnsson at gmail.com
Birgitta Jonsdottir
Member of the Icelandic Parliament, Key speaker for the IMMI
proposal, co-producer of the Baghdad video
Tel: +354 692 8884
Email: birgitta at this.is
http://www.collateralmurder.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 13:06:21 -0600
Subject: Fwd: Attn Ambassador Luo Zhaohui of the People's Republic of
China and Ambassador Dr. Andres Teran-Parral Re Snowden Assange
Bankster, Nexen, Pipelines. the Maritime Link, Harper and Obama etc
To: "calgary.northernhills" <calgary.northernhills@
"calgary.hays" <calgary.hays@assembly.ab.ca>, "calgary.cross"
<calgary.cross@assembly.ab.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, premier
<premier@gov.sk.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>
Associate Minister – International and Intergovernmental Relations (Asia)
Ms. Woo-Paw was elected to her second term as Member of the
Legislative Assembly for Calgary-Northern Hills on April 23, 2012. She
currently serves as the Associate Minister – International and
Intergovernmental Relations (Asia). Ms. Woo-Paw is also the Chair of
the Asia Advisory Council.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:02:39 -0600
Subject: Fwd: Attn Ambassador Luo Zhaohui of the People's Republic of
China and Ambassador Dr. Andres Teran-Parral Re Snowden Assange
Bankster, Nexen, Pipelines. the Maritime Link, Harper and Obama etc
To: eecucanada@cancilleria.gob.ec
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Doug Brinkman <richardwtc@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 11:01:16 -0600
Subject: Re: Attn Ambassador Luo Zhaohui of the People's Republic of
China and Ambassador Dr. Andres Teran-Parral Re Snowden Assange
Bankster, Nexen, Pipelines. the Maritime Link, Harper and Obama etc
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thanks David - you said you had a photo of the blogger "The Bacon Fat" are
you willing to share it with me?
Regards Doug Brinkman
*Hawkeyi Active - A Civil Information Company*
Photo, Art, Graphic Design and Video Productions.
Hawkeyi.com <http://www.ciactivist.org/
780.424.1538
*Civil Information Activism- Free News on YouTube*
#YEG Community News ciactivist.org
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 10:41:16 -0600
Subject: Fwd: Attn Ambassador Luo Zhaohui of the People's Republic of
China and Ambassador Dr. Andres Teran-Parral Re Snowden Assange
Bankster, Nexen, Pipelines. the Maritime Link, Harper and Obama etc
To: chineseembassy.ca@gmail.com, lgunter <lgunter@shaw.ca>,
"joshua.skurnik" <joshua.skurnik@hotmail.com>, richardwtc@gmail.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "dean.buzza"
<dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, editor <editor@desmogblog.com>
Attn
Economic and Commercial Section.
401 King Edward Avenue
Ottawa (Ontario) K1N 9C9
chineseembassy.ca@gmail.com.
My number is 902 800 0389
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 16:27:05 -0600
Subject: Fwd: Attn Ambassador Luo Zhaohui of the People's Republic of
China and Ambassador Dr. Andres Teran-Parral Re Snowden Assange
Bankster, Nexen, Pipelines. the Maritime Link, Harper and Obama etc
To: dave.peiser@peiserforcongress.
<RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, bginsberg <bginsberg@pattonboggs.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "ron.klain"
<ron.klain@revolution.com>, dkilgour <dkilgour@guelphmercury.com>
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 16:08:18 -0600
Subject: Attn Ambassador Luo Zhaohui of the People's Republic of China
and Ambassador Dr. Andres Teran-Parral Re Snowden Assange Bankster,
Nexen, Pipelines. the Maritime Link, Harper and Obama etc
To: chinaemb_ca@mfa.gov.cn, embassy@embassyecuador.ca,
ecuador@telus.net, birgittaj <birgittaj@althingi.is>, birgittajoy
<birgittajoy@gmail.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "Jacques.Poitras"
<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre
<andre@jafaust.com>
EMBASSY OF ECUADOR IN CANADA
OTTAWA
99 Bank Street, Suite 230
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 6B9
Tel: (613) 563 – 8206
(613) 563 – 4286
Fax: (613) 235 – 5776
E-mail: embassy@embassyecuador.ca
VANCOUVER
AD HONOREM
CONSULATE GENERAL
3835 Trinity Street
Burnaby, British Columbia
V5C 1N4
Tel: (604) 299 – 6600
Fax: (604) 789 – 3719
E-mail: ecuador@telus.net
Ambassador Luo Zhaohui
Embassy Address:
515 St. Patrick Street, Ottawa, ON K1N 5H3
Tel: 613-7893434
Fax: 613-7891911
E-mail: chinaemb_ca@mfa.gov.cn
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 15:54:52 -0600
Subject: Attn Wang Xinping Consulate General of the People's Republic
of China in Calgary Re Nexen, Pipelines. the Maritime Link, Harper and
Obama etc
To: chinaconsul_cal_ca@mfa.gov.cn
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
http://calgary.china-
Consul General Wang Xinping
1011 6th Ave. S.W.
Calgary,Alberta,
Canada T2P 0W1
Tel:403-2643322
Fax:403-2646656
Email: chinaconsul_cal_ca@mfa.gov.cn
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 14:00:27 -0600
Subject: Re Nexen, Pipelines. the Maritime Link, Harper and Obama etc
To: "Qi, Mindy (Calgary)" <Mindy.Qi@nexencnoocltd.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Good Day Ms Qi
Trust that I am impressed with your Integrity and diligence (No Joke).
After I send this email I will try to get an better connection and
call you again in short order. Whereas you now speak for a state owned
Corporation that operates within my native land of Canada and the USA
as well (both of which I am a person of) we really should discuss page
3 of this old PDf file of mine.
http://www.checktheevidence.
In order to briefy explain to you the documents I forwarded to you
yesterday I will say that at the very least I proved to CNOOC that I
am a whisleblower against the very corrupt Justice Systems and the
Financial Industy operating within at least 10 purportedly profound
democracies. The documents do prove that I sued 3 US Treasury Agents
and many others at least once back in 2002 and that many government
offials and many others are well aware of that fact. In 2004
I remained true to my words to politicians such as Harper, MacKay,
Layton, the PM Martin, Anne McLellan (a former director of Nexen's)
and their many parliamentry cohorts and ran for a seat in Canada's
38th Parliament
Later in 2004 I was falsely imprisoned after I returned to the USA in
order to continue to argue in court about my family's rights and
interests. My false arrest was done in open court before the Speech
from the Throne on Oct 1st 2004. The arrest was recorded on the public
record without a warrant or even a reason statedand I was held in
solitary confinement under the charges of "Other" with no bail terms
offered. After a few days DEFAIT was compelled to send one of its
consulate officers and some secretive member of the Canadian
Department of Public Safety to visit me in the Yankee jail. All those
mindless bureaucrats did was laugh at my plight and told me that they
could do nothing to help me be released from my false imprisonment. I
got of jail on my own with a lot of help from members of my Clan.Thus
in my humble opinion the Yankees and my fellow Canadians have no right
whatsoever to chastise the Chinese to doing similiar things to other
people. Imagine if such things were done to Stephen Harper in 2004?
Ten years later Harper is still playing dumb even though I debated one
of his lawyers in front of hundreds of people and his personal
computer answered my concerns weeks BEFORE I was falsely imprisoned.
Go Figure why I ran against the Bloc, the Green meanies, the NDO, the
Libranos and Harper and the Boyz in Blue again the following year.
Anyway before I returned to Canada in order to escape false
imprisonment once again and to prepare run for a seat in the 39th
Parlaiment I contacted many foreign embassies and particularly
China's. I did so because in October of 2004 I had registered my
idignation that the former Canadian PM Mulroney (As Chairman of
Forbes) had arranged a huge meeting of worldwide CEOs in China while
Bush was seekiiing reelection and everyone ignored or laughed at me.
So in return for bureaucratic incompetence I sent the members of the
G20 and others within the UN a rather huge pile of documents byway of
registered US Mail. China got them and I have the proof that they did.
The link I provided above is only to the cover letters..
Trust that again last year I reminded many countries of the documents
I sent them in 2005 after the NSA whistleblower Snowden sought refuge
in Hong Kong and the Russia. Here is just a little proof of what I say
is true.
http://thedavidamosrant.
Yesterday after speaking with lady within your "Integrity" office and
discussing the recent emails I had sent to DEFAIT etc they asked to
see the email with the attached documents and I quickly obliged.
However after their email address proved to be inoperative I called
your Head Office in Calgary in a effort to speak to Fang Zhi or one of
his underlings. The lady who answered the phone wanted to know my
business and then laughed at my effort to speak to any member of the
executive in Calgary. I did not find that funny at all and I quickly
told her that she could laugh at me all she wished but I would call
her bosses in China if need be.
For the record I was tryiing to inform you folks in Nexen about many
things but my past dealings with Nexen, the Chinese govenment and
people within the Canadian government such as Nexen's former director
Anne McLellan and CNOOC's current director Kevin Lynch should
concern your "Integrity" people greatly today.
I hope you folks at NEXEN at least noticed the letter that the Chair
of BHP sent to me in September of 2010 months before Harper stopped
his takeover bid of Potash Corp. I could talk about the ramifications
of that one letter alone for several hours.
FYI I picked your associate Diane Kossman to send an email to because
she had a lot to say in an email about CNOOC showing former Nexen
chief Kevin Reinhart the door. However nobody should deny that
Reinhart and many of his minions such as Kim Woima could not be
trusted or they would have informed the latest boss Fang Zhi and his
fellow CNOOC executives of my concerns about the actions and ethics of
foreign based companies and the exploitation of Canadian natural
resources before the Chinese opted to close the deal to buy Nexen.
For the record I told your "Integrity" lady to Google my name and
Nexen. If she had bothered to do so she would have easily found some
emails of mine about Nexen posted within another fella's blog. She did
not wish to but did ask for the email that I had sent to DEFAIT that
you have studied as well.
Now perhaps you folks at NEXEN should check out the emails I mentioned
on the phone. Within the following links an email to Kim Woima of
Nexen can be found.
http://thedavidamosrant.
http://thedavidamosrant.
http://thedavidamosrant.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:03:50 -0300
Subject: Ask yourself why CBC would report none of this
To: kim_woima@nexeninc.com, "greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>,
jack.tomik@cbc.ca, alan.dark@cbc.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, jacques_poitras
<jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>
You do know Landslide Annie is on the Board of Directors of Nexen I hope
http://www.cbc.ca/news/
http://www.nexeninc.com/en/
I mean no disrepect to you Ms. Qi. In all sincerity I do thank you for
doing your job. The email above should finally start the ball rolling
in order to allow me to have a long talk with some officials within
the Chinese government and of course your boss Fang Zhi and his many
lawyers and beancounters. Correct?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
On 8/11/14, Qi, Mindy (Calgary) <Mindy.Qi@nexencnoocltd.com> wrote:
> Hi, Mr. Amos
>
> Thank you for your call today, and unfortunately, I can't hear you clearly
> over the phone.
>
> I took a little bit time to review the files you sent to us and tried to
> read the email string below, however, I got very confused on your purpose of
> the call and your email. Besides, your attached documents dated back to 2003
> and it contains large volume of information which I have no clue why you
> would like to contact Nexen.
>
> Would you please explain your background story and clarify what you hope
> Nexen can do for you in a simple way? So that I can see if I need to pass
> your case to any team leaders here. It will be very hard for me to bring
> your case to them if I don't know what we can do for you.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Mindy Qi, CHRP
> Logistics & Events Specialist
> Corporate Communications
>
> Nexen Energy ULC
> 801-7th Avenue S.W.
> Calgary, AB, Canada T2P 3P7
> www.nexencnoocltd.com
>
> T: (403) 699-5232 :: F: (403) 699-7512 :: C: (403) 473-1929 ::
> E: mindy.qi@nexencnoocltd.com :: LinkedIn
>
>
http://thedavidamosrant.
Sunday, 9 June 2013
Re: It appears that Wikileaks, Iceland, Birgitta Jonsdottir and her
Pirate Party have no conscience whatsoever. I hoped I was wrong
However here is why I am not surprised
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Henrik Palmgren <redicecreations@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:46:26 +0200
Subject: Re: Oh my my I guess we know the score on you EH?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Oh my. Don't send me your spam. It's not good for anything.
2012/8/26 David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> On 8/25/12, Red Ice Creations <redicecreations@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Take me this list!
> >
> >
> > On 26 aug 2012, at 03:06, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> >> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:44:45 -0300
> >> Subject: I just called from 902 800 0369 Perhaps the Qatari Embassy
> >> should study the attachments closely EH Mr Alward?
> >> To: musoviczl@repsol.com, pribbeck@repsol.com,
> vcmorrissettem@repsol.com
> >> Cc: ottawa@mofa.gov.qa, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, David Amos
> >> <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "Davidc.Coon" <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>,
> >> leader <leader@greenparty.ca>
> >>
> >> Qatari Embassy in Ottawa, Canada
> >> 800-150 Metcalfe Street
> >> Ottawa Ontario K2P 1P1
> >> Telephone (+1) 613 241 4917
> >> E-mail ottawa@mofa.gov.qa
> >> http://www.repsolenergy.com/
> >>
> >> http://www.repsolenergy.com/
> >>
> >>
> http://www.
> >>
> >>
> http://www.nccar.ca/
> >>
> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> From: Alan Dark <Alan.Dark@cbc.ca>
> >> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:57:14 -0400
> >> Subject: Re: I just called from 902 800 0369 and tried to talk to you
> >> Mr Tomick (Out of office)
> >> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> Thank you for your email. Please be advised that I am currently out of
> >> the office; returning Monday Agust 27th.
> >>
> >> If your matter is urgent, please contact Camilla Inderberg at
> >> 416-205-5545 or by email camilla.inderberg@cbc.ca or Janice Smith
> >> 416-205-2940 or janice.smith@cbc.ca
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Al
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> >> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:03:50 -0300
> >> Subject: Ask yourself why CBC would report none of this
> >> To: kim_woima@nexeninc.com, "greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>,
> >> jack.tomik@cbc.ca, alan.dark@cbc.ca
> >> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, jacques_poitras
> >> <jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>
> >>
> >> You do know Landslide Annie is on the Board of Directors of Nexen I hope
> >>
> >>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/
> >>
> >>
> >> http://www.nexeninc.com/en/
> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> >> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 19:17:20 -0300
> >> Subject: Re Danny Williams Vs the Sierra Club Very Interesting lawsuit
> >> and counterclaim EH Mr Bennnett
> >> To: jb@sierraclub.ca, lgue@davidsuzuki.org, grenouf
> >> <grenouf@genuinewitty.com>, editor@theindependent.ca
> >> Cc: jbaker@ottenheimerbaker.com, info@alderonironore.com,
> >> ktsakumis@alderonironore.com, "pgleeson@alderonironore.com \"David
> >> Amos\"" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, jvettese@casselsbrock.com
> >>
> >>
> http://thechronicleherald.ca/
> >>
> >> http://atlantic.sierraclub.ca/
> >>
> >> FYI I just call Bruno Marcocchio @ 902-567-1132 and he had no clue as
> >> to what I was talking about However trust that just like Gretchen
> >> Fitzgerald, Danny Williams and his corporate pals know EXACTLY who I
> >> am and why I was calling.
> >>
> >>
> http://www.tmx.com/en/news_
> >>
> >> http://alderonironore.com/
> >>
> >>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
> >>
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <redicecreations@gmail.com>; "birgittaj" <birgittaj@althingi.is>;
"Piratar" <piratar@pirateparty.is>; "ed.pilkington"
<ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>; <janice.smith@cbc.ca>;
<camilla.inderberg@cbc.ca>; "david.akin" <david.akin@sunmedia.ca>;
<Alan.Dark@cbc.ca>; "newsonline" <newsonline@bbc.co.uk>
Cc: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; "aih" <aih@cbc.ca>;
"news-tips" <news-tips@nytimes.com>
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 5:49 PM
Subject: I wonder if the the bigtime bullshitter Henrik Palmgren even
remembers me I bet he still plays dumb just like YOU, Ed Pilkington,
the NYTimes, CNN, Sun Media, CBC and the BBC EH Birgitta?
http://www.redicecreations.
On 6/6/13, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://thedavidamosrant.
>
> From: postur@irr.is
> Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 08:23:00 +0000
> Subject: Re: It appears that Wikileaks, Iceland, Birgitta Jonsdottir
> and her Pirate Party have no conscience whatsoever. I hoped I was
> wrong However here is why I am not surprised
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received.
>
> Kveðja / Best regards
> Innanríkisráðuneytið / Ministry of the Interior
>
http://thedavidamosrant.
Sunday, 18 May 2014
Yo Birgitta Who is more of a crook Julian Assange, the gay lawyer Glen
Greenwald, the equally sneaky NDP lawyer David Eby in BC or your
mindless Prime Ministers of Iceland
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: postur@for.is
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 02:03:05 +0000
Subject: Re: [Mogulegur Ruslpostur] Yo Birgitta Who is more of a crook
Julian Assange, the gay lawyer Glen Greenwald, the equally sneaky NDP
lawyer David Eby in BC or your mindless Prime Ministers of Iceland
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received
Kveðja / Best regards
Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: postur@irr.is
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 02:03:06 +0000
Subject: Re: [Mogulegur Ruslpostur] Yo Birgitta Who is more of a crook
Julian Assange, the gay lawyer Glen Greenwald, the equally sneaky NDP
lawyer David Eby in BC or your mindless Prime Ministers of Iceland
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received.
Kveðja / Best regards
Innanríkisráðuneytið / Ministry of the Interior
----- Original Message -----
From: BARRY WINTERS <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 06:12:37 -0600 (MDT)
Subject: Re: The BBC the Guardian the CBC, Brazil, Iceland, Canada
Pierre Omidyar, Glen Greenwald and all the other bigtime bullshitters
aka journalists may enjoy this blog but they will never write about it
N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Cc: interceptjobs <interceptjobs@theintercept.
<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, SFeinman@fahrllc.com, ppalmater
<ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca>, birgittaj <birgittaj@althingi.is>,
jamiebaillie@gov.ns.ca, bob rae <bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net>,
nichor@parl.gc.ca, greg weston <greg.weston@cbc.ca>, Manon Hardy
<Manon.Hardy@priv.gc.ca>, Dion Mario <Dion.Mario@psic-ispc.gc.ca>,
csu@jesuits.ca, "George.Soros"
<George.Soros@
<george.osborne.mp@parliament.
ambassador@brasilemb.org, postur <postur@for.stjr.is>, oldmaison
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, lgunter
<lgunter@shaw.ca>, hmc <hmc@mediacoop.ca>, tips <tips@660news.com>,
news <news@thetelegraph.com.au>, tips <tips@gawker.com>, news919
<news919@rogers.com>, newsonline <newsonline@bbc.co.uk>, newsdesk
<newsdesk@theage.com.au>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, "mckeen.randy"
<mckeen.randy@gmail.com>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier
<premier@gnb.ca>, Brian Gallant <briangallant@nbliberal.ca>,
"Davidc.Coon" <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, "david.fraser"
<david.fraser@mcinnescooper.
Canning <grcanning@me.com>, john adams <john.adams@queensu.ca>,
"john.logan" <john.logan@gnb.ca>
No one has ever "enjoyed this blog" David Amos sucks cock!
http://thedavidamosrant.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: postur@for.is
Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 12:42:06 +0000
Subject: Re: Re Snowdon Assangethe DHS the RCM Pthe CBC, Brazil
Iceland, the Guardian Pierre Omidyar, Glen Greenwald and all the other
bigtime bullshitters
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received
Kveðja / Best regards
Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "OSBORNE, George" <george.osborne.mp@parliament.
Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 12:36:36 +0000
Subject: Thank you for your e-mail
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you very much for your e-mail to George Osborne.
Non- Tatton Residents
If you are contacting George in his capacity as Chancellor of the
Exchequer, please re-send your e-mail to
public.enquiries@hm-treasury.
Alternatively, write to The Correspondence & Enquiry Unit, HM
Treasury, 1 Horseguards Road, London, SW1A 2HQ or telephone 020 7270
5000.
Tatton Residents
Thank you for your email- this is simply an automated response to
acknowledge it. If you are one of George's Tatton constituents, please
ensure that you have included your full postal address and postcode,
so that we can identify you as a Tatton resident. Once we have
confirmed this then George will reply to your message.
If you are unsure if George is your MP, you can check with your
postcode http://findyourmp.parliament.
The Tatton office, which is for constituent enquiries only, can be
reached on 01565 873037.
If you are a personal contact of George's, your e-mail will be
forwarded accordingly.
With kind regards,
Office of Rt Hon George Osborne MP
MP for Tatton
Chancellor of the Exchequer
________________________________
UK Parliament Disclaimer:
This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have
received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your
system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted.
This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted
for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 09:03:20 -0300
Subject: Re Assange and the DND versus Mean Old Me
To: ryan.gallagher@theintercept.
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Trust that you and Snowden don't know the half of it I have a LOT
more INFO and that your pals in the CBC and the Guardian etc know it
https://firstlook.org/
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0389
From: Birgitta Jonsdottir
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:14:02 +0000
Subject: Re: Bon Soir Birgitta according to my records this is the
first email I ever sent you
To: David Amos
dear Dave
i have got your email and will read through the links as soon as i
find some time keep up the good fight in the meantime
thank you for bearing with me
i am literary drowning in requests to look into all sorts of matters
and at the same time working 150% work at the parliament and
the creation of a political movement and being a responsible parent:)
plus all the matters in relation to immi
with oceans of joy
birgitta
Better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are
not.
Andre Gide
Birgitta Jonsdottir
Birkimelur 8, 107 Reykjavik, Iceland, tel: 354 692 8884
http://this.is/birgitta – http://joyb.blogspot.com -
http://www.facebook.com/
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 23:05:48 -0300
Subject: Re Mean old me versus the incompetent Canadain Military
Police and Barry Winters a zionist who claims to be a former officer
To: media@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, commission@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, Barry Winters
<sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, "Julian Assange)" <editor@wikileaks.org>,
Sheldon Day <gem3intucson@q.com>, whistleblower
<whistleblower@ctv.ca>, "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, brian
<brian@brian-macdonald.ca>, tracy <tracy@jatam.org>
Cc: mackay01 <mackay01@canada.com>, IgnatM <IgnatM@parl.gc.ca>, LaytoJ
<LaytoJ@parl.gc.ca>, danf <danf@danf.com>, "john.logan"
<john.logan@gnb.ca>
ATTENTION
Glenn Stannard Acting Chair
Military Police Complaints Commission
270 Albert Street, 10th Floor
Ottawa, ON, K1P 5G8
Telephone: (613) 947-5625
Telephone Toll Free: 1 800 632-0566
Fax: (613) 947-5713
Fax Toll Free: 1 877 947-5713
e-mail: commission@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca
Do you people have a lawyer with the balls to talk to me or must I sue
the CROWN first?
Perhaps your snobby military lawyers should study every word of the
evil bastard's blog
http://baconfat53.blogspot.
Furthermore Iggy's legal people should know this should be some sort
of Fucking Secret BULLSHIT to protect the reputations of many a
corrupt politician EH Mr Mindless Minister of Defence Petey Baby
MacKay??
http://baconfat53.blogspot.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Haukur S Magnusson <haukur@grapevine.is>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 02:50:58 +0000
Subject: Re: OK allow me to be brief then Tell Julian Assange and your
bullshitting pals in Iceland to go fuck themselves
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Dude, I really have no idea who you are or why you are so upset with
this Julian person.
Hope it all works out for you.
Haukur
On Apr 7, 2010, at 2:43 AM, David Amos wrote:
> On 4/6/10, Haukur S Magnusson <haukur@grapevine.is> wrote:
>> Pardon me sir,
>>
>> why do you keep signing your crazy e-mails with a Reykjavík Grapevine
>> footer? It is disturbing, and we would appreciate it if you stopped
>> doing it.
>>
>> Also, if you want people to read what you have to say, make it less
>> long and all over the place.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Haukur S. Magnússon
>>
>> Editor // Reykjavík Grapevine
>> haukur@grapevine.is
>> Tel. (+354) 695-8158 / (+354) 540-3602
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 7, 2010, at 2:24 AM, David Amos wrote:
>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/user/
>>>
>>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.
>>>
>>> This should be some sort of Fucking Secret BULLSHIT in order to
>>> protect the reputations of many a corrupt politician even a few
>>> Icelanders EH?
>>>
>>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.
>>> movment-god.html
>>>
>>> Friday, August 14, 2009
>>> What does Amerika, the "Truther" movment, "God" and retards have
>>> to do
>>> with Canada
>>>
>>> We do not have to worry about comment from Little Dean and
>>> Dave...they
>>> are to uneducated to understand most posts
>>>
>>> So have you seen them, been annoyed or insulted by them, have you
>>> smelled their disease? Have you ever crossed the "medicine line" and
>>> seen some Yank being taken into custody because he just has..."this
>>> constitutional right to bear arms"...in Canada. I remember years ago
>>> when the debate was on in Canada, about there being weapons of mass
>>> destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends" demanded that Canada
>>> join
>>> into "the Coalition of the Willing.
>>>
>>> American "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for
>>> NOT
>>> buying into the US policy. At the time I was serving as a planner at
>>> NDHQ and with 24 other of my colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM
>>> HQ to
>>> be involved in the planning in the planning stages of the
>>> op....and to
>>> report to NDHQ, that would report to the PMO upon the merits of the
>>> proposed operation.
>>>
>>> There was never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites
>>> where there were deployed WMD. Coalition assets were more than
>>> sufficient for the initial strike and invasion phase but even at
>>> that
>>> point in the planning, we were concerned about the number of
>>> "boots on
>>> the ground" for the occupation (and end game) stage of an
>>> operation in
>>> Iraq.
>>>
>>> We were also concerned about the American plans for occupation plans
>>> of Iraq because they at that stage included no contingency for a
>>> handing over of civil authority to a vetted Iraqi government and
>>> bureaucracy. There was no detailed plan for Iraq being
>>> "liberated" and
>>> returned to its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan.
>>>
>>> This was contrary to the lessons of Vietnam but also to the military
>>> thought, that folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and
>>> others
>>> illucidated upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what
>>> conditions are to met before US troop can redeploy?
>>>
>>> Prime Minister Jean Chretien and the PMO were even at the very
>>> preliminary planning stages wary of Canadian involment in an Iraq
>>> operation....History would prove them correct. The political
>>> preesure
>>> being applied on the PMO from the George W Bush administration was
>>> onerus
>>>
>>> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
>>> military assets even moreso It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
>>> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantene
>>> operations
>>> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in
>>> Afghanistan
>>> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
>>> operation....
>>>
>>> The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian lives and
>>> liberal
>>> political capitial.. and the priority of which ....not
>>> neccessarily in
>>> that order. Essentially Canada detemined to stay out of Iraq,
>>> paid the
>>> price, of a larger role in Afghanistan to enable US military
>>> assets to
>>> redeploy to Iraq.
>>>
>>> The US op in Afghanistan evolved from a US op, to a UN op, to a
>>> NATO /
>>> ISAF op. NATO countries other than Canada and the UK shun combat
>>> operations in Afghanistan..their rules of deployment and engagement
>>> mitigate against NATO troops engaging the Taliban. By design I am
>>> quite sure.
>>>
>>> But now the American Iraq op, is a great success. The "surge"
>>> worked.
>>> But alas now 127 Canadian soldiers are dead. The 2011 deadline is
>>> coming nigh....and President Barak Obama and NATO want Canada to
>>> consider extending the deployment of Canadian troops. The motives
>>> are
>>> different. The US wants to... needs to, as matter of national
>>> security, to defeat insurgency in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Our
>>> European allies want Canada to remain and continue to "punch
>>> above its
>>> weight" so European soldiers do not have to actually fight or die.
>>>
>>> That begs a few questions: "Nations do not have friends, nations
>>> have
>>> interests" -Henry Kissinger. Is American national security re
>>> terrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan compatable with Canadian
>>> national interests? If this country, Canada is going to be a
>>> continuing ally in "the war against terror"....should not our
>>> "friends
>>> and neighbours across the medicine line be more amenable in
>>> matters of
>>> trade, or just living up to their free trade agreements. If our
>>> "friends and neighbours" to the south want Canadians to fight
>>> side by
>>> side...maybe that 7 % Softwood lumber tariff was a mistake...or the
>>> buy American provision in the currant stimulus plan ought to be re
>>> thought.
>>>
>>> Our American "friends" give Israel roughly 3 billion dollars a
>>> year to
>>> be spent buying weapons systems from US defense contactors...to
>>> survive (both Israel and US defense industries) Perhaps US dollars
>>> should flow to Canada to buy weapons systems and patrol aircraft and
>>> naval platforms...after all, aren't we your "friends and allies"?
>>>
>>> There is nothing similar with American culture, and politics between
>>> Canada and the US. Canada evolved into nation status and the US,
>>> revolted violently. This difference in the means we became
>>> nations...has greatly defined who and what we are.
>>>
>>> Our American "friends" look upon Canada as cultural, economic and
>>> political satrap.... Now to their great consternation they are
>>> finding
>>> out... that is NOT the case . Nothing good came to Canada by way of
>>> America. The military "schewir punct" should be defense of our
>>> continental shelf and the arctic.
>>>
>>> Canada does need to stop shipping unrefined bitumen to the US and
>>> totally refine it here and start building a pipeline for bitumen to
>>> Canada's west coast to sell to Asian and the Chinese market. It is
>>> more than past time to understand ..our American "friends" are
>>> not our
>>> friends at all.
>>>
>>> Or else it is: Bend over here it comes again.....KY anyone?
>>> Posted by Seren at 11:27 AM
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Barry Winters <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>
>>> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 08:33:09 -0600
>>> Subject: Re: The Reykjavík Grapevine Al Jazeera Iceland WikiLeaks
>>> and
>>> British Banksters etc
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Tuesday, April 6, 2010
>>> David Amos is a RCMP rat
>>> Police Constables the world over call informants...cocksuckers.
>>> David
>>> Raymond Amos is a RCMP rat, a cocksucker, and he admits it. Just a
>>> few days
>>> ago David Raymond Amos admit he informed on and gave evidence in a
>>> murder
>>> case involving Gillies Moreau.
>>>
>>>
>>> David Amos has never sued or blown the whistle on anyone. There
>>> is no
>>> citation of any case involving David Raymond Amos in the New York
>>> Law
>>> Reporting Service, Shepards, or the Mass. Law reporting society or
>>> for that
>>> matter any state citation reporting service anywhere...you the
>>> places
>>> lawyers go to precedents for their briefs.
>>>
>>> Wikileaks will have NOTHING to do with David Amos. DavidAmos
>>> routinely
>>> plagerizes wikileaks material and then says he had everything to do
>>> with its
>>> exposure. David Raymond Amos is not an "ethical whistle blower" he
>>> has no
>>> record of having any information regarding public corruption
>>> whatsoever.
>>>
>>> But David Raymond Amos has a record of being a rat! A snitch for
>>> the "feds"
>>> he claims to hate. His kids are rats and assets of the RCMP and FBI
>>> because
>>> they are low low level snitches that inform on the lower rungs of
>>> minor
>>> organized crime organizations.
>>>
>>> But David Raymond Amos is also a pedophile or a "skinner" and a
>>> "goof".....
>>>
>>> Time will eventually run out for David as it always does for rats
>>> and
>>> skinners. So much for being an "ethical whistleblower" eh!
>>> Posted by Seren at 7:07 AM
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>> To: "whistleblower" <whistleblower@ctv.ca>; "Dan Fitzgerald"
>>> <danf@danf.net>; "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>; "Edith. Cody-
>>> Rice"
>>> <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>; "Barry Winters" <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>;
>>> "eachtem"
>>> <eachtem@hotmail.com>; "danadurf" <danadurf@hotmail.com>; "dean Ray"
>>> <deanr0032@hotmail.com>; "dean" <dean@law.ualberta.ca>; "dean.law"
>>> <dean.law@mcgill.ca>; "Dean.Buzza" <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
>>> <kevin.Jackson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>> Cc: <oldmaison@yahoo.com>; "tracy" <tracy@jatam.org>;
>>> <David.ALWARD@gnb.ca>;
>>> "Richard Harris" <injusticecoalition@hotmail.
>>> Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 11:06 PM
>>> Subject: Fwd: The Reykjavík Grapevine Al Jazeera Iceland
>>> WikiLeaks and
>>> British Banksters etc
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 01:58:58 -0300
>>> Subject: RE: The Reykjavík Grapevine Al Jazeera Iceland WikiLeaks
>>> and
>>> British Banksters etc
>>> To: grapevine@grapevine.is,
>>> Cc: editor@wikileaks.org,
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>
>>> From: "Julian Assange)" editor@wikileaks.org
>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 3:15 PM
>>> Subject: Al Jazeera on Iceland's plan for a press safe haven
>>>
>>> FYI: Al-Jazeera's take on Iceland's proposed media safe haven
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>
>>> More info http://immi.is/
>>>
>>> Julian Assange Editor WikiLeaks http://wikileaks.org/
>>>
>>> From: "David Amos" david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>> To: "Julian Assange)" editor@wikileaks.org
>>> Cc: "Dan Fitzgerald" danf@danf.net; "Byrne. G" Byrne.G@parl.gc.ca
>>> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:35 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Al Jazeera on Iceland's new plan Thanx Here is
>>> something
>>> about Iceland and Banksters Al Jazeera would enjoy
>>>
>>> Checkout this old pdf file from 2005 at about page two or three
>>>
>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/
>>>
>>> Then read on and chuckle
>>>
>>> From: postur@fjr.stjr.is
>>> Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009
>>> Subject: Re: RE: Iceland and Bankers etc I must ask the obvious
>>> question. Why have you people ignored me for three years?
>>> To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Dear David Amos
>>>
>>> Un...
[Message clipped] View entire message
Notice no comment section????
Two N.B. journalists win prestigious journalism awards
Forestell receives RTDNA Lifetime Achievement Award; Jones inducted to AJAs Hall of Fame
Two renowned CBC New Brunswick journalists have recently been honoured with awards for outstanding careers in journalism.
Robert Jones has been a reporter and producer with CBC New Brunswick since 1990. His investigative reports on petroleum pricing in N.B. won several regional and national awards and led to the adoption of price regulation in 2006.
Harry Forestell is the host of CBC New Brunswick News. He worked in London as a journalist from 1995 to 2000 and from 2005 to 2008 as CBC's European correspondent for CBC Newsworld.
Robert Jones inducted into Atlantic Journalism Hall of Fame
Robert Jones, CBC News (CBC)
The Atlantic Journalism Awards (AJA) announced the induction of Robert Jones to the Atlantic Journalism Hall of Fame. Jones is well known in the province for his weekly radio segment as the Gas Guru. He has been a journalist in N.B. for 33 years, mostly as an investigative reporter based in Saint John.
Throughout that time, many of his award-winning stories have triggered official investigations or changes in government policy. In some cases they have generated millions of dollars in benefits to consumers and taxpayers in the province.
Jones is one of Atlantic Canada's most decorated journalists of the last quarter century winning awards for reports on government, the courts, business and sports. His wins include stories on radio, television and online for both spot news and enterprise reporting.
Read how Robert Jones has effected change through journalism in N.B:
- 'Mind-boggling': Canaport LNG assessment slashed by nearly $202M after tax deal repealed
- Property tax scandal bills pile up as N.B. sets aside $2.6M to compensate municipalities
- Irving Oil billing practices for heating fuel being investigated by EUB
Harry Forestell recognized with RTDNA Lifetime Achievement Award
Harry Forestell, CBC News (CBC)
The
Radio Television Digital News Association (RTDNA) has recognized Harry
Forestell with a Canada East Region Lifetime Achievement Award for a
career that spans more than 30 years.
Harry has covered every major story in the Maritimes and he is an important voice for his audience that knows he has the highest journalistic standards. He cares deeply about the stories he reports. Congratulations Harry.
- Fiona Coway, President, RTDNA Canada
Watch RTDNA's Harry Forestell Highlight Reel
Over a storied career, Forestell has reported from across Europe, the UK and North America.
While in London, he reported on the death of Diana, the former Princess of Wales, the rise to power of Tony Blair, and the launch of the Euro in 1999.
As a host-interviewer Forestell has grilled personalities as diverse as Shimon Peres, Diana Krall and Bill Gates. From the anchor desk he led CBC's breaking news coverage of the Indian Ocean tsunami in 2004, the London terror bombings of 2005 and the death of Michael Jackson in 2009.
He also reported on the SARS outbreak in 2003, the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster and the lead up to the second war in Iraq.
CBC Atlantic journalists win Gold with 10 AJA awards
Annual awards honour excellence and achievement in journalism on the East Coast
In a virtual Twitter ceremony, the Atlantic Journalism Awards (AJAs) announced their 2020 gold winners in recognition of Atlantic Canada's finest journalists. Each year, the AJAs honour journalistic excellence and achievement for print and electronic news in Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland and Labrador.
Radio
Rebecca Nolan – CBC N.L. The mystery of the Portuguese waltzes
Enterprise Reporting: Radio
Brittany Wentzell – CBC Sydney School advisory councils
Television
Enterprise Reporting: Television
Ariana Kelland/Rob Antle/Gary Quigley/Sherry Vivan – CBC N.L. Stopping domestic violence
Feature: Television
Logan Perley/Michael Heenan/Jocelyn Elsdon/María José Burgos – CBC N.B. – Made from this land
![](https://thumbnails.cbc.ca/maven_legacy/thumbnails/543/683/FDR_STORY_MADE_FROM_THIS_LAND_THUMBS_MASKS_corrected.jpg?crop=1.777xh:h;*,*&downsize=510px:* 510w")
Best Television News Broadcast
CBC Compass – a tie with Le Téléjournal Acadie
Video Journalist: Television
Garrett Barry – CBC Newfoundland and Labrador – Show of Work
Other: Any Medium
Commentary: Any Medium
Connell Smith – CBC N.B. – An absent goodbye
Connell Smith and his mother, Cleta. (Submitted/Connell Smith)
Tom Murphy – CBC NS Surfing towards change in North Preston, N.S.
Best Student Journalism
Alexandre Silberman @CBCNB – a tie with Nova Scotia Community College Students @NSCCNews
Atlantic Journalism Hall of Fame
Donna Allen, Journalist, CBC P.E.I.
Robert Jones, Journalist, CBC N.B.
A special mention goes to CBC N.B. reporter Aidan Cox who won gold in Enterprise Reporting: Newspaper for work he did with the Daily Gleaner.
CBC Atlantic journalists win 6 awards at 2021 Canadian RTDNA awards
Earlier this month, CBC Atlantic journalists from across the region won 6 awards at the 2021 Best Canadian Local News Radio Television Digital News Association (RTDNA) awards. The annual awards honour the best journalists, programs, stations and newsgathering organizations in video, audio and digital across the country
Congratulations to all the 2021 RTDNA award winners. We saw the best of the best in journalism and storytelling from across Canada. Every nominee and winner should be proud of their accomplishments.
- RTDNA Canada President Fiona Conway
The CBC Atlantic winners are as follows:
Digital
Overall Excellence in Digital
CBC Nova Scotia – CBC N.S. Digital News
Video
Breaking News (Small/Medium Market)
CBC NL – Here & Now: Snowmageddon
Continuing Coverage
CBC NL – Stopping Domestic Violence
Enterprise
Excellence in Editing (Small/Medium Market)
Congratulations to all the 2021 RTDNA award winners. We saw the best of the best in journalism and storytelling from across Canada. Every nominee and winner should be proud of their accomplishments.
Tom Murphy – CBC NS Surfing towards change in North Preston, N.S.
Best Student Journalism
Alexandre Silberman @CBCNB – a tie with Nova Scotia Community College Students @NSCCNews
Atlantic Journalism Hall of Fame
Donna Allen, Journalist, CBC P.E.I.
Robert Jones, Journalist, CBC N.B.
A special mention goes to CBC N.B. reporter Aidan Cox who won gold in Enterprise Reporting: Newspaper for work he did with the Daily Gleaner.
CBC New Brunswick – The Lost Art of the Centennial
![](https://thumbnails.cbc.ca/maven_legacy/thumbnails/752/343/JohnPedersen2-cropped.jpg?crop=1.777xh:h;*,*&downsize=510px:* 510w")
TV Newscast (Small/Medium Market)
CBC NL – The Death of John Crosbie
13 Deadly Hours was named Best Investigative Digital piece at the National level.
The 6 winners for Best Canadian Local News awards were drawn from winners at the regional level across Canada. The other East Region award winners are as follows:
Video
Excellence in Video
CBC New Brunswick – The Valedictorians: New Brunswick's Class of 2020
![](https://thumbnails.cbc.ca/maven_legacy/thumbnails/927/235/kids.jpg?crop=1.777xh:h;*,*&downsize=510px:* 510w")
Feature News (Small/Medium Market)
CBC Nova Scotia – Topless Breast Cancer Survivor in N.S. Inspires Women and Finds a Bosomless Buddy
Investigative
CBC Newfoundland and Labrador – Cross-Canada Pet Scam
News – Live Special Events
CBC New Brunswick – New Brunswick Votes: 2020 – Election Night Preshow
Audio
Continuing Coverage
CBC Newfoundland and Labrador – Fed Up – Food Insecurity in NL
Feature News (Small/Medium Market)
CBC Saint John – Your Journey, Your Way: Atlantic Canada's First Residential Hospice
Digital
Breaking News (Small/Medium Market)
Continuing Coverage
CBC Nova Scotia – Nova Scotia Mass Killing
Enterprise
Excellence in Data Storytelling
CBC Prince Edward Island – Climate Change Now: How Daily Life Has Already Changed on P.E.I.
Feature News (Small/Medium Market)
CBC New Brunswick – Centennial Legacy Lost
The Centennial Building was the centre of the New Brunswick government for many years. (Provincial Archives of New Brunswick)
Opinion
The RTDNA previously announced that two CBC Atlantic journalists would be recognized with Lifetime Achievement Awards:
Lifetime Achievement Award
Donna Allen – Journalist, CBC Prince Edward Island
Harry Forestell – Host, CBC New Brunswick News
About The Atlantic Journalism Awards
The Atlantic Journalism Awards (AJAs) was started in 1981 to honour journalistic excellence and achievement in print and electronic news in Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland/Labrador.
Hundreds of journalists have been honoured since the inception of the AJAs. Today a volunteer Board of Directors representing a wide range of news outlets directs the AJAs. The program is funded by a number of partners and contributors. Judging is conducted by independent panels of judges and the awards are presented at a gala awards ceremony in the spring.
New AJAs Team
We’re rounding out a new team for the Board of Directors and Council. Check back for the complete list.
Paul MacNeill
AJAs Chair
Publisher – Island Press Ltd. Montague, PEI
https://www.peicanada.com/eastern_graphic/armed-police-no-prescription-for-mental-health-care/article_1286c970-6adf-11eb-b99b-ff2b80656629.html
Against the tide
Armed police no prescription for mental health care
Paul MacNeill Feb 10, 2021
Paul MacNeill Publisher
Winner of more than 50 regional, national, international awards for commentary and investigative journalism. Founder of The Georgetown Conference on building sustainable rural communities. Featured in A Good Day’s Work. Talking head for CBC Radio and TV.
Tel: 1-902-838-2515 Ext: 201
Email: paul@peicanada.com
Cell 902 313 0072
Bill Skerrett PhD
AJAs Interim Executive Director
Bill is the founding Executive Director of the AJAs and an inductee into the AJAs Hall of Fame.
Bill Skerrett, office@AJAs.ca 902-478-6026
Natalie Clifford BPR J.D.
AJAs Interim Associate Executive Director
Natalie is a PR specialist and lawyer and has been associated with the AJAs for 10 years.
Natalie Clifford - 902-240-4080, ajas.natalie@gmail.com, natalie@cslegal.ca
Do you want to be a Board member or an advisor on the AJAs Council? Send an email indicating your interest to office@AJAs.ca.
HALIFAX, NS, June 8, 2021 /CNW/ - The Atlantic Journalism Awards (AJAs) is pleased to announce the gold and silver winners in the 2020 competition. More information at www.AJAs.ca.
View/listen to all 2020 finalists at www.ajasonline.org/finalists2020.
NEWSPAPERS
Breaking/Spot News Reporting: Newspaper
The gold winner is: Juanita Mercer – The Telegram – St. John's, NL – Snowmageddon.
The silver finalists in this category are:
Alex Bill – allNewfoundlandLabrador.com – St. John's, NL – Nasdaq acquires Verafin.
Andrew Rankin – The Chronicle Herald – Halifax, NS – Lawyer: tenant evicted by demolition.
Feature: Newspaper
The gold winner is: Noushin Ziafati – The Chronicle Herald – Halifax, NS – Refugee claimant 'wrestling virus' at Northwood.
The silver finalists in this category are:
Anne Calder – The Chronicle Herald/Saltwire – Halifax, NS – The extraordinary evolution of writer Amy Mckay.
Drew Brown – The Independent – St. John's, NL – Unmasking Donny Dooley: Newfoundland's most wanted troll.
Enterprise Reporting : Newspaper
The gold winner is: Aidan Cox – The Daily Gleaner – Fredericton, NB – Holes in tracking raise questions around racial discrimination in policing.
The silver finalists in this category are:
Andrew Rankin – The Chronicle Herald – Halifax, NS – The making of a mass killer.
Ashley Fitzpatrick – The Independent – St. John's, NL – A glimpse inside: a day at Her Majesty's Penitentiary.
Photojournalism News
The gold winner is: Keith Gosse – The Telegram – St. John's, NL – Family escapes house fire.
The silver finalists in this category are:
John Morris – Reuters and others – Charlottetown, PEI – Nova Scotia shootings.
Keith Gosse – The Telegram – St. John's, NL – Fatal rollover.
Photojournalism Portrait/Feature
The gold winner is: John Morris – Reuters and others – Charlottetown, PEI – Back to school after COVID March break.
The silver finalists in this category are:
John Morris – The Globe and Mail – Charlottetown, PEI – Canada/USA Border Closure.
Keith Gosse – The Telegram – St. John's – Distorted driving.
Editorial Cartooning
TIE for gold: Bruce MacKinnon – The Chronicle Herald – Halifax, NS – Show of work.
and also:
Michael de Adder - The Chronicle Herald –Halifax NS - Show of work.
Best Community Newspaper News Story
The gold winner is: Tina Comeau – Tri-County Vanguard – Yarmouth, NS – Bringing life to unmarked graves.
The silver finalists in this category are:
Maurice Rees – The Shoreline Journal – Maitland, NS – Portapique coverage.
Rhea Rollmann – The Independent – St. John's, NL – An empty lot on Eric Street holds the key to the city.
RADIO
Breaking News: Radio
The gold winner is: Mark Hodgins/News95.7 newsroom – News95.7 – Halifax, NS – The manhunt for a mass murderer.
The silver finalists in this category are:
Greg Smith – VOCM – St. John's, NL – Premier Ball calls in the army.
Martine Blanchard/son équipe– Radio-Canada Acadie – Moncton, NB – Une première entrevue avec le Dr. Ngola.
Feature: Radio
The gold winner is: Rebecca Nolan – CBC NL – St. John's, NL – The mystery of the Portuguese waltzes.
The silver finalists in this category are:
Janna Graham – freelance journalist/producer, CBC NB – Sackville, NB – The banished sea.
Latonia Hartery/Angela Antle – CBC NL – St. John's, NL – Dead weight at best: the frozen voices of women explorers.
Enterprise Reporting: Radio
The gold winner is: Brittany Wentzell – CBC Sydney – Sydney, NS – School advisory councils.
The silver finalists in this category are:
David Burke – CBC NS – Halifax, NS – The hidden horror of police domestic violence.
Prajwala Dixit – CBC NL – St. John's, NL – Raped, pregnant and alone in a foreign land.
Best Information News Radio Program (Selected Program)
The gold winners are: Martine Blanchard/Christine Manore,19 avril 2020: Émission spéciale: la tuerie de Portapique en N.-É. – Radio-Canada Acadie – Moncton, NB.
There are no silver finalists in this category.
Best Radio Newscast (Selected Newscast)
The gold winner is: VOCM News at Noon January 22, 2020 – VOCM – St. John's, NL.
The silver finalists in this category are:
CBC Radio News May 22, 2020 – CBC PEI – Charlottetown, PEI.
ICI le midi 11 février 2020 – Radio-Canada Acadie – Moncton, NB.
TELEVISION
Breaking News/Spot News: Television
The gold winners are: Angel Moore/Trina Roache/Paul Poirier – APTN – Halifax, NS – Mi'kmaw fishery.
The silver finalists in this category are:
Here&Now news team – CBC NL – St. John's, NL – Snowmageddon.
Nicolas Steinbach – Radio-Canada Acadie – Moncton, NB – Incendie majeur à Val-Comeau.
Feature: Television
The gold winners are: Logan Perley/Michael Heenan/Jocelyn Elsdon/María José Burgos – CBC NB – Fredericton, NB – Made from this land.
The silver finalists in this category are:
Janique LeBlanc – Radio-Canada Acadie – Moncton, NB – L'univers du drag en Acadie.
Jessica Doria-Brown – CBC PEI – Charlottetown, PEI – Pandemic driving tests.
Enterprise Reporting: Television
The gold winners are: Ariana Kelland/Rob Antle/Gary Quigley/Sherry Vivan – CBC NL – St. John's, NL – Stopping domestic violence.
The silver finalists in this category are:
Elizabeth Chiu – CBC NS – Halifax, NS – The Serrece Winter story.
Nicolas Steinbach – Radio-Canada Acadie – Moncton, NB – COVID-19 dans le Restigouche : le doute plane sur la responsabilité du Dr Ngola.
Video Journalist: Television
The gold winner is: Garrett Barry – CBC NL – St, John's, NL – Show of work.
The silver finalists in this category are:
Julien Lecacheur – Radio-Canada Acadie – Moncton, NB – Show of work.
Laura Meader – CBC PEI – Charlottetown, PEI – Show of work.
Best Television News Broadcast
TIE for gold: Le Téléjournal Acadie Édition du 21 avril 2020 – Radio-Canada Acadie – Moncton, NB.
and also:
Compass July 3, 2020 – CBC PEI – Charlottetown, PEI.
The silver finalist in this category is:
The NTV Evening Newshour January 17, 2020 – NTV – St. John's, NL.
MAGAZINES
Atlantic Magazine Article
The gold winners are: Tom Cheney/Nick Hawkins – Saltscapes – Pictou, NS – A dying breed.
The silver finalists in this category are:
Emily Baron Cadloff – MacLean's Magazine – Halifax, NS – 'It should not define us'.
Tom Cheney/Nick Hawkins – Atlantic Salmon Journal – Chamcook, NB – Forest, river, fish.
Atlantic Magazine: Best Cover
The gold winner is: Atlantic Books Today – Halifax, NS – Fall, 2020: New voices, better world.
The silver finalists in this category are:
The Coast – Halifax, NS – December, 2020: The pandemic outside is frightful, but on wifi you're so delightful.
EDIT – Rothesay, NB – Fall, 2020: Change is coming.
Atlantic Magazine: Best Profile Article
The gold winner is: Stephen Kimber – Atlantic Business Magazine – St. John's, NL – CEO of the year.
The silver finalists in this category are:
Ameeta Vohra – Halifax Magazine – Halifax, NS – Thunderstruck.
Jenn Thornhill Verma – EDIT – Rothesay, NB – The yarnbomber: not your grandmudder's knitting.
OTHER – ANY MEDIUM
Excellence in Digital Journalism: Breaking News
The gold winner is: Yvette d'Entremont – Halifax Examiner – Halifax, NS – Body of work: pandemic coverage.
The silver finalists in this category are:
Halifax Examiner news team – Halifax Examiner – Halifax, NS – Mass murder coverage.
René Landry/Alix Villeneuve – Radio-Canada Acadie – Caraquet, NB – Directeurs de scrutin au N.-B. : les militants progressistes-conservateurs sont légion.
Excellence in Digital Journalism: Enterprise/Longform
The gold winners are: Rob Csernyik/Mary Campbell – The Cape Breton Spectator – Sydney, NS – Sydney's casino at 25.
The silver finalists in this category are:
Joan Baxter – Halifax Examiner – Halifax, NS – Port Wallace gamble.
Marine Ernoult - Actions Femmes IPÉ – Charlottetown, PEI – Féminin PluriElles.
Business Reporting: Any Medium
The gold winner is: Rob Csernyik – The Halifax Examiner – Halifax, NS – The casino crapshoot.
The silver finalists in this category are:
Ashley Fitzpatrick/Alex Bill – allNewfoundlandLabrador.com – St. John's, NL – Fallout of a scuttled refinery deal.
René Landry/Alix Villeneuve – Radio-Canada Acadie – Moncton, NB – Un projet éolien qui fait jaser à Anse-Bleue.
Sports Reporting: Any Medium
The gold winner is: Tom Murphy – CBC NS – Halifax, NS – Surfing towards change in North Preston, NS.
The silver finalists in this category are:
François Le Blanc – Radio-Canada Acadie – Moncton, NB – Yanic Duplessis: Réconcilier hockey et homosexualité.
Jeremy Fraser – Cape Breton Post – Sydney, NS – 30th anniversary of UCCB Capers Football.
Arts and Entertainment Reporting: Any Medium
The gold winner is: Stephen Kimber – Atlantic Business Magazine – St. John's, NL – Michael Donovan's epic odyssey.
The silver finalists in this category are:
Camille Bourdeau – Radio-Canada Acadie – Moncton, NB – Le Ballet-Théâtre Atlantique à la Fête du Canada.
María José Burgos – CBC NB – Fredericton, NB – Centennial legacy lost.
Commentary: Any Medium
The gold winner is: Connell Smith – CBC NB – Fredericton, NB – An absent goodbye.
The silver finalists for this category are:
Brian Flinn – allNovaScotia.com – Halifax, NS – Government business: under the rug.
Paul MacNeill – Eastern Graphic – Montague, PEI – The drug cave is a signal that PEI needs to do better.
Stephen Kimber – Halifax Examiner – Halifax, NS – Shopping while strolling.
Best Student Journalism
The gold winners are: Nova Scotia Community College Students – www.NorthPrestonland.ca – Halifax, NS – 2020 Updates: untitled, the legacy of land in North Preston.
The silver finalist in this category is:
Alexandre Silberman – CBC NB – Fredericton, NB – With 3 students, a New Brunswick island school's future.
The Jim MacNeill New Journalist Award
The gold winner is: Ben Cleary – NTV – St. John's, NL – Show of work.
The silver finalists in this category are:
Nicole Munro – The Chronicle Herald – Halifax, NS – Show of work.
Taryn Grant – CBC NS – Halifax, NS – Show of work.
Our thanks to Cision for sponsoring this announcement.
SOURCE Atlantic Journalism Awards
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:58:47 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE P.E.I. Leaders' Debate Perhaps the latest Premier,
the CBC, the RCMP and the other Leaders should explain this email to
the folks sometime EH Stevey Boy Harper?
To: eclark@coxandpalmer.com, donareid@hotmail.com,
grammy1@eastlink.ca, davidbrown@pei.eastlink.ca, neil@bhcpa.ca,
carol@liberal.pe.ca, jamie@liberal.pe.ca, info@darlenecompton.ca,
michael.redmond@ndppei.ca, rross@theguardian.pe.ca, compass@cbc.ca,
schapman@newcap.ca, editor@peicanada.com, newsroom@theguardian.pe.ca,
gmacdougall@theguardian.pe.ca, texte@lavoixacadienne.com,
newsroom@journalpioneer.com, rebootbill@live.ca,
redlikeme88@gmail.com, info@buzzon.com, editor@thecadre.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 08:16:53 -0400
Subject: RE P.E.I. Leaders' Debate Perhaps the latest Premier, the
CBC, the RCMP and the other Leaders should explain this email to the
folks sometime EH Stevey Boy Harper?
To: admin@greenparty.pe.ca, Kiavash.Najafi@gmail.com,
rob.lantz@anewdirection.ca, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
"justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
< MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, "Elizabeth.May.a1" <Elizabeth.May.a1@parl.gc.ca>
http://www.cbc.ca/news/
Contact
902-566-3303
rob.lantz@anewdirection.ca
Address: 357 University Avenue
Community: Charlottetown
http://www.greenparty.pe.ca/?
http://www.ndppei.ca/new-
For more information, please contact:
Kia Najafi, Campaign Director, 902-940-4842 or Kiavash.Najafi@gmail.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 17:22:07 -0600
Subject: Fwd: Also For the public record almost every editor/reporter
I sent this email to denied getting it However not all of them did
To: eclark@coxandpalmer.com, donareid@hotmail.com,
grammy1@eastlink.ca, davidbrown@pei.eastlink.ca, neil@bhcpa.ca,
carol@liberal.pe.ca, jamie@liberal.pe.ca, info@darlenecompton.ca,
michael.redmond@ndppei.ca, rross@theguardian.pe.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
http://www.movingforwardpei.
President Ewan Clark
eclark@coxandpalmer.com
Vice President Male
Don Reid
donareid@hotmail.com
Vice President Female
Marilyn Lowther
grammy1@eastlink.ca
Treasurer
Neil Handrahan
neil@bhcpa.ca
Secretary
David Brown
davidbrown@pei.eastlink.ca
Carol Doyle
Office Manager
Liberal Party of PEI
carol@liberal.pe.ca
Jamie MacPhail
Executive Director,
Liberal Party of PEI
jamie@liberal.pe.ca
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
http://www.ndppei.ca/ndp-will-
http://redlikeme.ca/loyalty-
http://www.theaurora.ca/
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 16:47:13 -0600
Subject: Fwd: Fwd: Also For the public record almost every
editor/reporter I sent this email to denied getting it However not all
of them did
To: redlikeme88@gmail.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
http://www.journalpioneer.com/
Bill Kays
March 10, 2015 - 12:20
When the fox is guarding the hen house, everyone knows who wins, not
us poor chickens. The public needs their own WOLF to go after the
foxes and make sure the foxes do not come back. Poor old Wadey boy
thinks offering up a retired Liberal Judge that toes the party line,
integrity stops at the party line, so appoint an independent outside
person as conflict of interest commissioner. WE NEED INVESTIGATION
FROM OUTSIDE SOURCES, not from party hacks.
Reply
Matilda
March 10, 2015 - 13:21
Bill, correct me I'm wrong, but isn't retired Judge McQuaid not
the brother of Peter McQuaid, provincial president of the PC Party,
and this is a move by Premier McLaughlan to keep the PCs quiet on this
issue. He obviously thinks we're all too backward to see through the
shenanigans.
Bill Meeker
March 10, 2015 - 13:39
You see Bill, the trouble with you is that you consider yourself
smarter than you actually are. In fact most of your comments are inane
ramblings, but then you and give us all a good laugh by saying Judge
McQuaid is a Liberal hack.
Bill Kays
Bill Kays
March 10, 2015 - 15:28
Hey buddy, nobody gets it right all the time, BUT I know this. My
gut tells me the government is corrupt, from top to bottom, and should
be investigated by outside sources. Only then might the truth come
out. Do you agree or disagree?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 15:34:24 -0600
Subject: Re: Fwd: Also For the public record almost every
editor/reporter I sent this email to denied getting it However not all
of them did
To: Bill Kays <rebootbill@live.ca>
I have to call a bunch of other people and I was frustrated that you
would not listen to what I was telling you
On 3/11/15, Bill Kays <rebootbill@live.ca> wrote:
>
> Hi David:
>
> redlikeme.ca is the best link for truthful news on PEI. They have the
> whistle blowers. I will read your info and familiarize myself with the
> content you sent me. Call me again sometime as I think you hung up for some
>
> reason. You can reach Rob MacEachern at redlikeme88@gmail.com
>
> Bill Kays
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos
> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 6:01 PM
> To: bill@reddirttruth.com ; rebootbill@live.ca
> Cc: David Amos
> Subject: Fwd: Also For the public record almost every editor/reporter I sent
> this email to denied getting it However not all of them did
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:50:07 -0600
> Subject: Also For the public record almost every editor/reporter I
> sent this email to denied getting it However not all of them did
> To: schapman@newcap.ca, editor@peicanada.com,
> newsroom@theguardian.pe.ca, gmacdougall@theguardian.pe.ca,
> texte@lavoixacadienne.com, newsroom@journalpioneer.com,
> info@buzzon.com, editor@thecadre.ca
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> < Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "bob.paulson"
> < bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "roger.l.brown"
> < roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> < Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:15:18 -0600
Subject: Fwd: For the public record I called the PC Prez Peter McQuaid
on his cell (902 969 5105) and he played as dumb as hell
To: schapman@newcap.ca, editor@peicanada.com,
newsroom@theguardian.pe.ca, gmacdougall@theguardian.pe.ca,
texte@lavoixacadienne.com, newsroom@journalpioneer.com,
info@buzzon.com, editor@thecadre.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
< Newsroom@globeandmail.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:00:09 -0600
Subject: Fwd: For the public record I called the PCD Prez Peter
McQuaid on his cell (902 969 5105) and he played dumb as hell
To: paul@peicanada.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Island Press Limited
567 Main Street
PO Box 790 Montague, PE C0A 1R0
Tel: 1-902-838-2515
Toll Free: 1-800-806-5443 Fax: 1-902-838-4392
Publisher
Paul MacNeill
Tel: 1-902-838-2515 Ext: 201
paul@peicanada.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:56:03 -0600
Subject: For the public record I called the PCD Prez Peter McQuaid on
his cell (902 969 5105) and he played dumb as hell
To: "peter.mackay" <peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca>,
neil.robinson@vac-acc.gc.ca, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>,
mmdorsey@gov.pe.ca, jasherry@gov.pe.ca, dwcurrie@gov.pe.ca,
samyers@assembly.pe.ca, omcrane@assembly.pe.ca,
jsjaylward@assembly.pe.ca, crlavie@assembly.pe.ca,
twright@theguardian.pe.ca, info@peipcparty.ca, "ht.lacroix"
< ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>, "sean.casey.A1" <sean.casey.A1@parl.gc.ca>, sean
< sean@canadalandshow.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
However I was not surprised because I also saw that he was not above
making deals with liberals.
http://www.peicanada.com/
Mr McQuaid brought his idea to Paul Murphy of DP Murphy Inc, the
company that owns the 18 Tim Hortons locations across on PEI.
The company expressed an interest in the idea and by late summer, Mr
McQuaid began the process of buying the land next to his gas station
so construction on the new coffee shop could begin.
“We feel the building fits in very well with the community and its
architecture,” Mr McQuaid said. “The contractors did a great job of
making it blend in, as opposed to sticking out.”
On 3/11/15, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> We all know there is far more to the story as to why Robinson quit EH?
>
> http://www.theglobeandmail.
>
> Mr. Robinson denies Mr. Myers’s allegations. In his statement, he says
> that Mr. Myers’s “recollection of the conversation does not match mine
> and does not make sense.”
>
> He said, however, that he had no choice but to step down.
>
> “The decision by Mr. Myers to publicly advance such a story and Mr.
> Lantz’s decision, based on that same story, to call for an emergency
> sitting of the Legislative Assembly make it abundantly clear that I,
> as an independent officer of the Legislature, do not have the
> necessary confidence of the Assembly,” he wrote in his statement.
>
> Peter McQuaid, president of the PC Party on PEI, said Mr. Robinson did
> the “ honourable thing in stepping down.”
>
> “I think that you have to be very careful about conflict and that’s
> not necessarily passing judgment on him,” he said.
>
> YEA RIGHT
>
> Below you will find the text of just one email of mine to Robinson in
> 2011 and the pdf files hereto attached were also a included at the
> time
>
> This is his latest contact info and I did manage to spea with the lawyer
> today.
>
> A. Neil Robinson
> Senior Counsel
> Called to the bar: 1976 (NL); 2008 (PE)
> Justice Canada
> Legal Serv.-Veterans Affairs, 161 Grafton St.
> PO Box 7700, Stn. Central
> Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island C1A 8M9
> Phone: 902-566-8992
> Fax: 902-566-8793
> Email: neil.robinson@vac-acc.gc.ca
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos
> Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 9:41 PM
> To: Mackay.P ; neil.robinson@vac-acc.gc.ca ;
> peter.driscoll@mcinnescooper.
> Lori.Rasmussen@justice.gc.ca ; James.Gunvaldsen-Klassen@
> stoffp1 ; daniel.wallace@mcinnescooper.
> Cc: florencejohn@ns.sympatico.ca ; Dennis ; maritime_malaise
> Subject: RE Veterans and litigation This email proves that many lawyers
> such
> as Peter Driscoll and you know of my concerns EH MacKay??
>
> http://www.veterans.gc.ca/eng/
>
> http://csat.top-talk.net/t382-
>
> http://natoveterans.org/en/
>
> http://www.thestar.com/news/
>
> http://www.mcinnescooper.com/
>
> http://www.mcinnescooper.ca/
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 08:32:55 -0300
> Subject: So Mr Robinson who do you work for if at all? Feds
> provincials or the Common folk?
> To: neil.robinson@vac-acc.gc.ca, kmcasey@assembly.pe.ca,
> ajmacdonald@assembly.pe.ca, abflynn@gov.pe.ca, maritime_malaise
> < maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, "Wayne.Lang" <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> Minister <Minister@cic.gc.ca>, "william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.
> < william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.
> Cc: idowbiggin@upei.ca, cpyyounker@gov.pe.ca, chmackay@assembly.pe.ca,
> mariamacdonald@gov.pe.ca
>
> Who are your mindless security people in the Legislative Buildings to
> try to barr me from coming to PEI under threat of arrest merely
> because Jason Kenney loves a stinky election?
>
> OR BETTER Who the Hell do you dudes in Veterans Affairs think you are
> to ignore me since your false allegations against me in 2008 caused me
> to be illegally arrested in 2008? Just so ya know I called both of
> your Fed and Provincial offices on Friday and neither said your worked
> there. Thus I truly believe that you are just another politically
> appointed lawyer who does not bother to work at all.
>
> Just Dave
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 15,097
> Domain Name gc.ca ? (Canada)
> IP Address 198.103.134.# (Department of Veterans Affairs)
> ISP GTIS
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : Canada (Facts)
> State/Region : Prince Edward Island
> City : Charlottetown
> Lat/Long : 46.2333, -63.1333 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.)en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Firefox
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/5.0.1
> Javascript version 1.5
> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
> Color Depth : 24 bits
> Time of Visit Sep 23 2011 2:18:42 pm
> Last Page View Sep 23 2011 2:18:42 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.google.ca...v-
> Search Engine google.ca
> Search Words david amos veterans affairs canada
> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...04/
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...04/
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-4:00
> Visitor's Time Sep 23 2011 2:18:42 pm
> Visit Number 15,097
>
>
> http://www.gov.pe.ca/photos/
>
> Neil Robinson
> Office of the Conflict of Interest Commissioner
> Province House
> Richmond Street / P.O. Box 2000
> Charlottetown, PE C1A 7K7
> Phone (902) 368-5970
> Fax (902) 368-5175
> www.assembly.pe.ca/conflict/
> neil.robinson@vac-acc.gc.ca
>
>
>
> http://www.lspei.pe.ca/
>
> A. NEIL ROBINSON JUSTICE CANADA - LEGAL SERVICES
> Address: 161 GRAFTON STREET
> BOX 7700
> City/Prov: Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island
> Phone: 902-566-8810
> Fax: 902-566-8793
>
>
> http://edmonton.ctv.ca/
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:45:36 -0300
> Subject: Lets see if Dougy Currie's opponents have any sand before I
> sue PEI EH Sqeaky?
> To: eliza.knockwood@greenparty.ca, bernardflynn@peipcparty.ca,
> noel.pauley@bellaliant.ca
> Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, squeak1948
> < squeak1948@hotmail.com>
>
> Perhaps they all should read the text of the letter to Binns 6 years ago
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>
> http://www.electionspei.ca/
>
> http://greenparty.ca/campaign/
>
> I remember talking to Ms Knockwood as she went over to protest Old
> Harry She never called me back but i read what her friends said about
> mean old me not long afterwards
>
> http://peipcparty.ca/District-
>
> I tried to talk to Bernie but he did not pick up the phone and his
> message box was full
>
> http://ndppei.ca/
>
> As far as the NDP guy goes they don't seem to talk about anything
> except how great their leaders are so I called Noel's home number and
> did manage to leave a message
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:17:49 -0300
> Subject: I just called and tried to talk to you Dougy Baby and your
> help Seth played as dumb as a post
> To: doug.currie@liberal.pe.ca, squeak1948 <squeak1948@hotmail.com>
> Cc: maritme_malaise <maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca>
>
> http://www.movingforwardpei.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Doug Currie <DWCURRIE@gov.pe.ca>
> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:07:10 -0300
> Subject: Re: Fwd: INTERPOL, the RCMP and even the Premier of Nova
> Scotia picked a bad day to play dumb EH Mr Harper?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> Between Wednesday, September 7th and Monday, October 3rd, both dates
> inclusive, I will out of the office and all inquiries in relation to
> the Department of Education and Early Childhood Development should be
> directed to 368-4610.
>
> All inquiries in relation to the Department of Justice and Public
> Safety, and Attorney General, should be directed to 368-5152.
>
> Thank you,
>
>>>> David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> 09/21/11 14:06 >>>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:27:19 -0300
> Subject: INTERPOL, the RCMP and even the Premier of Nova Scotia picked
> a bad day to play dumb EH Mr Harper?
> To: premier@gov.ns.ca, "Wayne.Lang" <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca" <ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca>, tony
> < tony@peoplestandup.ca>, june.bell@fco.gov.uk, "alfred.smithers"
> < alfred.smithers@fco.gov.uk>, shahtx@gmail.com, danfour
> < danfour@myginch.com>, thepurplevioletpress
> < thepurplevioletpress@gmail.
> < oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>
> Cc: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>,
> "william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.
>
> http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=
>
> Just Dave
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 15,078
> Domain Name (Unknown)
> IP Address 198.166.214.# (Province of Nova Scotia)
> ISP Telus Communications
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : Canada (Facts)
> State/Region : Nova Scotia
> City : Halifax
> Lat/Long : 44.65, -63.6 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Firefox
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/6.0.2
> Javascript version 1.5
> Monitor Resolution : 1280 x 1024
> Color Depth : 24 bits
> Time of Visit Sep 21 2011 11:46:01 am
> Last Page View Sep 21 2011 11:46:26 am
> Visit Length 25 seconds
> Page Views 2
> Referring URL http://www.google.ca...
> Search Engine google.ca
> Search Words "david amos" 2005 election new brunswick
> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Out Click David R. Amos
> http://www.blogger.c...
> Time Zone UTC-4:00
> Visitor's Time Sep 21 2011 11:46:01 am
> Visit Number 15,078
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "shahtx(gmail)" <shahtx@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 21:38:46 -0800
> Subject: RE: BRITISH Embassy -
> http://ukinbahrain.fco.gov.uk/
> with querry
> To: June.Bell@fco.gov.uk
> Cc: "j.kroes" <j.kroes@interpol.int>, info@interpol.int,
> children@interpol.int, webmaster@interpol.int, a.farelo@interpol.int,
> environmentalcrime@interpol.
> < Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Jacques.Poitras"
> < Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, oldmaison@yahoo.com, danfour
> < danfour@myginch.com>, thepurplevioletpress
> < thepurplevioletpress@gmail.
> < david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> "Gilles. Blinn" <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Barry.MacKnight"
> < Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.
> < alfred.smithers@fco.gov.uk>
>
> Thank you June, for helping.
>
> Advise is good. I am cc'ing interpol also to see if they can do this for
> me.
>
> I apologize for cc'ing other people. Pls forgive me. But I desperately need
> help.
>
> I called the interpol yesterday. Mr Loic requested I resend emails via
> < http://www.interpol.int/
> http://www.interpol.int/
> received them & read them while on the phone for 30 mins.
>
> Mr Loic said he will pass the detail to Legal Dept but otherwise helpless -
> I told him this was quite deplorable and unacceptable. What kind of
> ludicrous system is this ? Why do I have to wait for weeks before I get a
> reply ?
>
> Regards,
> Tahir Shah
> Mobile : 00 973 3 636 2590
> Tel/Fax: 00 973 77 066 118
> < http://www.skype.com/> www.skype.com : SHAHTX
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 18:05:05 -0400
> Subject: Cya'll in court or hell someday EH pussies?
> To: rotorhead@ns.sympatico.ca, capt@islandtelecom.com,
> vinapieroway@nf.sympatico.ca, seankis@rogers.com, info@champlaw.ca,
> thehouse@cbc.ca, gordjenkins@gmail.com, cbellamy@sympatico.ca,
> d.c.brunton@sympatico.ca
> Cc: maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 18:00:48 -0400
> Subject: See you in court someday pussy
> To: Dennis <dmanuge@eastlink.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, toewsv1
> < toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>, "steve.graham" <steve.graham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "Wayne.Lang" <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, Mackap
> < Mackap@parl.gc.ca>, stoffp1 <stoffp1@parl.gc.ca>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos
> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 3:11 PM
> To: rotorhead@ns.sympatico.ca ; capt@islandtelecom.com ;
> vinapieroway@nf.sympatico.ca ; seankis@rogers.com ; info@champlaw.ca ;
> thehouse@cbc.ca ; gordjenkins@gmail.com ; cbellamy@sympatico.ca ;
> d.c.brunton@sympatico.ca ; dmanuge@eastlink.ca ; Mike Blais ; Wayne.Lang ;
> pm@pm.gc.ca ; toewsv1@parl.gc.ca ; Gilles. Blinn ; Mackap@parl.gc.ca ;
> stoffp1@parl.gc.ca ; Nycole.Turmel
> Cc: maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca ; nichor
> Subject: Perhaps his fellow veterans should ask Sean Bruyea if it was my
> name or Brent Babcock's that rang the right bells to cause the Harper Govt
> to settle so quickly?
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
> Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 07:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
> Subject: Attn Sean Bruyea Does the name Brent Babcock within Veterns
> Affairs ring any bells?
> To: seankis@rogers.com, info@champlaw.ca
> Cc: thehouse@cbc.ca
>
> If not at least a former intelligence officer should know who these
> dudes are and why Petey Mackay is very nervous about what I am up to
> these days.
>
> Just Dave
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 12,009
> Domain Name gc.ca ? (Canada)
> IP Address 131.137.245.# (Defence Research Establishment-Ottawa)
> ISP Defense Research Establishment
> Location
> Continent : North America
> Country : Canada (Facts)
> State/Region : Ontario
> City : Ottawa
> Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
> Language English (Canada) en-ca
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 6.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0;
> Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR
> 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)Javascript
> version 1.3
> Monitor
> Resolution : 1024 x 768
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Sep 28 2010 12:48:22 pm
> Last Page View Sep 28 2010 12:48:22 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL
> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time Sep 28 2010 11:48:22 am
> Visit Number 12,009
>
> BTW You pissed me off when you asked the same question bureaucrats ask
> three times
>
> In my humble opinion the better question for you to ask after you quit
> interupting with the same dumb question would how can I help you My
> number is 902 800 0369 perhaps your lawyer should check the pdf hereto
> attached and try to talk to a very serious whisteblower EH?
>
> http://www.seanbruyea.com/
>
> FYI check this lawyer's work about your Fed buddies
>
> http://www.waterwarcrimes.com/
>
> New Deputy Minister of Justice - Myles Kirvan
>
> Deputy Minister of Justice in a nation that is covering up a major
> international crime is a dangerous job. Astute observers are asking:
> How long will Canada's newest Deputy Minister of Justice and Deputy
> Attorney General, Mr. Myles Kirvan last in his new job?
>
> Formerly Associate Deputy Minister of Public Safety, Mr. Kirvan
> becomes Deputy Minister of Justice and Deputy Attorney General of
> Canada, effective April 6.
>
> Mr. Kirvan replaces outgoing Deputy Minister, John Sims, Q.C., who was
> caught making fraudulent submissions in the WaterWarCrimes lawsuit in
> Canada's Federal Court, who refused to retract the submission and who
> suddenly resigned, effective April 1, 2010, a few short weeks after
> his misconduct was broadcast internationally via several whistle
> blowing sites on the internet, such as Paul Drockton, Jeff Rense and
> David Icke. Canada's mainstream media ignored the story.
>
> As Associate Deputy Minister of Public Safety, (RCMP) from October 1,
> 2007 to date, Mr. Kirvan would probably have been privy to the secret
> police files containing the identity of the Water War Criminals - a
> group that Canadian legal authorities have consistently refused to
> investigate and prosecute.
>
> We at the WaterWarCrimes crimes web site and blog welcome the
> appointment of Mr. Myles Kirvan to the position of Deputy Minister of
> Justice and Attorney General for Canada. It is always refreshing to
> see a new face and our expectation of common human decency, justice
> and fair and equitable treatment from our fellow human beings is ever
> present nothwithstanding the sinister, devilish, and corrupt record of
> Canadian and British Columbia Government employees to date.
>
> In 1991, Myles Kirvan began his Public Service career in the
> Department of Justice as General Counsel, Federal-Provincial Relations
> Office. He went on to serve in the Department of Justice in various
> capacities including Senior Advisor to the Associate Deputy Minister,
> Public Law; General Counsel, Dispute Resolution Services; Senior
> General Counsel, Legal Services, Health Canada; and from 2003-2007,
> Assistant Deputy Minister, Business and Regulatory Law.
>
> Prior to joining the Public Service of Canada, Myles Kirvan served as
> an advisor to Ministers. He has served as Legislative Assistant to the
> Solicitor General of Canada; Senior Policy Advisor to the Minister of
> National Revenue; Judicial Affairs Advisor and then Chief of Staff for
> the Minister of Justice and Attorney General. In 1993 Myles Kirvan
> served as Deputy Chief of Staff to the Prime Minister.
>
> Myles Kirvan is a member of the Law Society of Upper Canada a.k.a. the
> Province of Ontario. He holds a B.A. from Carleton University and an
> LL.B. from the University of Ottawa.
>
> We will be watching Mr. Kirvan VERY closely and keep out readers
> posted on the conduct of Canada's Ministry of Justice under Deputy
> Attorney General, Myles Kirvan.
>
>
> Did Deputy Minister of Justice John Sims Commit Fraud?
> Was He Fired??
>
> John Sims, Q.C.
>
> John Sims is Canada's Deputy Minister of Justice. He and his
> subordinates are supposed to tell the truth in Court proceedings but
> they do not.
>
> Mr. Sims has falsely, recklessly, argued in the Federal Court, that
> the lawsuit filed in the Federal Court under Action T-95-09, by Ms.
> Gibbs and Mr. Carten, as joint plaintiffs, is a re-litigation of an
> application, filed by Mr. Carten, acting alone, in Octrober, 2007, in
> the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Kelowna Registry, Action No.
> 77000.
>
> This argument by Mr. John Sims is nonsense and we think it is a
> deliberate fraud.
>
> The two claims are entirely different.
>
> The claim filed in Kelowna was an application for an injunction to
> restrain the Provincial Court judges in British Columbia from the
> dealing with the matter of the enforcement of the accumulated arrears
> of child support that now total close to $400,000 that Mr. Carten
> supposedly owes to his ex-wife as a result of the deliberately
> excessive child support payment order made against him by former BC
> Deupty Attorney General Robert Edwards. The Provincial Court Judges
> will not permit Mr. Carten to call necessary or useful witnesses and
> have been trying to railroad him.
>
> By contrast, the claim in the Federal Court is a claim seeking
> compensatory damages against the Government of Canada and the
> Government of British Colubmia and several others for conspiriing to
> cause harm to Mr. Carten and Ms. Gibbs because they were connected to
> Sun Belt Water Inc. and deemed to be assisting Sun Belt Water Inc. on
> a path that would reveal who the criminals behind the WaterWarCrimes
> were.
>
> We have accused John Sims, Q.C., the Deputy Attorney General for
> Canada of intentionally misleading the Court and he has not responded
> to our allegation.
>
> Silence is agreement.
>
> We sent our allegation to every member of the House of Commons and
> Senate of Canada, by e-mail on December 25, 2009, and on December 30,
> 2009, before the members returned to their offices, Prime Minister
> Harper suspended (prorogued) Parliament. Is this just another one of
> those strange co-incidences like the nine dead judges?
>
>
> John Sims Deputy Minister of Justice - Professional Background
>
> John Sims
>
> In 2009 the Government of Canada awarded Mr. Sims The Outstanding
> Achievement Award. The award is considered to be the most prestigious
> award in the Public Service, this award is presented to senior public
> service employees who have distinguished themselves by a sustained
> commitment to excellence.
>
> The Government of Canada made the following comments about Mr. Sims at
> the time of his receiving the award.
>
> "Mr. Sims received a Bachelor of Arts (Honours) in History and
> Economics and a Bachelor of Laws from Queen's University. He was
> called to the Ontario Bar in 1973 and joined the Public Service of
> Canada in 1977 as legal counsel to Transport Canada.
>
> As a lawyer, Mr. Sims has provided high-quality legal advice to
> ministers and the Government of Canada on some of the most complex and
> sensitive policy and operational priorities of the government, such as
> aviation safety, war crimes, labour relations and national security
> (including as the first head of legal services at the Canadian
> Security Intelligence Service). His advice has always reflected the
> highest standards of integrity and ethical behaviour and has been
> informed by the broader context and potential implications".
>
> For the full text of the remarks about Mr. Sims go to
> http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/arp/
>
> We ask the reader:
>
> If Mr. Sims has a high reputation for integrity why did he mislead the
> Federal Court?
>
> It Sure Looks Like John Sims Was Fired?
>
> Referring to whether a high level Ottawa minister will resign or be
> fired, CTV Ottawa bureau chief Robert Fife recently stated:
>
> “In this town nobody voluntarily resigns,” Mr. Fife said. “They’ve got
> a limo, and a staff, and they love this sort of stuff. She’s not going
> to give it up.”
>
> Link to the Fife quote:
> http://www.theglobeandmail.
>
> Based on Robert Fife's reputation for logical thinking and other
> factors outlined above, we think that John Sims was fired.
>
> This web site and our Chronology of events at
> http://waterwarcrimes.
> John Sims and how he misled Prothonotary Lafreniere of Canada's
> Federal Court in February 2010. Then, in the last week of February
> and the first week of March 2010, the story of the corruption by John
> Sims begain circulating around the planet courtesy of some prominent
> internationally recognized whistle blowers, such as Jeff Rense, Paul
> Drockton, David Icke and many others who helped get the truth out
> along with John Sims.
>
> On March 15, 2010, John Sims, Q.C., Canada's Deputy Minister of
> Justice and Deputy Attorney General tendered his resigntion effective
> April 1, 2010.
>
>
> Sean Bruyea
> Sean lives in the Ottawa area and can be reached at the following
> telephone number and email address:
> Telephone Number: (613) 825-8002
> Email: seankis@rogers.com
>
> http://www.seanbruyea.com/wp-
>
> http://champlaw.ca/8801/19601.
>
> Champ & Associates
> 43 Florence Street
> Ottawa, ON K2P 0W6
> Phone: (613) 237-4740
> Fax: (613) 232-2680
> info@champlaw.ca
>
>
> Etc Etc Etc (The rest of the email above is below after a large space)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos
> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 3:05 PM
> To: rotorhead@ns.sympatico.ca ; capt@islandtelecom.com ;
> vinapieroway@nf.sympatico.ca ; seankis@rogers.com ; info@champlaw.ca ;
> thehouse@cbc.ca ; gordjenkins@gmail.com ; cbellamy@sympatico.ca ;
> d.c.brunton@sympatico.ca
> Cc: maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca
> Subject: Cya'll in court or hell someday EH pussies?
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 18:00:48 -0400
> Subject: See you in court someday pussy
> To: Dennis <dmanuge@eastlink.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, toewsv1
> < toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>, "steve.graham" <steve.graham@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "Wayne.Lang" <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, Mackap
> < Mackap@parl.gc.ca>, stoffp1 <stoffp1@parl.gc.ca>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dennis <dmanuge@eastlink.ca>,
> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 2:30 PM
> To: 'David Amos'
> Cc: 'maritime_malaise'
> Subject: RE: I never heard another word from the veterans Howcome? Your
> monetary ties must be too close to that of the RCMP EH?
>
> Not interested David
> Thanks
>
> Dennis
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
> Sent: November-12-11 3:04 PM
> To: dmanuge@eastlink.ca
> Cc: maritime_malaise
> Subject: Fwd: I never heard another word from the veterans Howcome? Your
> monetary ties must be too close to that of the RCMP EH?
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/
> html
>
> http://natoveterans.org/en/
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:41:39 -0400
> Subject: Re: I never heard another word from the veterans Howcome?
> Your monetary ties must be too close to that of the RCMP EH?
> To: Mike Blais <mlblaisrcr@gmail.com>, "Wayne.Lang"
> < Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, toewsv1
> < toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>
> Cc: "Gilles. Blinn" <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Mackap
> < Mackap@parl.gc.ca>, stoffp1 <stoffp1@parl.gc.ca>, "Nycole.Turmel"
> < Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca>
>
> Well you can bet that I ain't LAUGHING
>
> Read something for a change will ya? It costs nothing to read this
> simple pdf file.
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.
> f
>
> BTW I am this David Amos
>
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 21:14:11 -0300
> Subject: Mr Aguirre I just called from 902 800 0369
> To: Gary@aguirrelawfirm.com
> Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>,
> NYAG.Pressoffice@oag.state.ny.
> < matt.taibbi@rollingstone.com>
>
> FYI I am the unamed Whistleblower that Mr Nester of the SEC mentioned
> in 2009 who is the link from Putnam investments and Madoff matter
>
> Etc Etc Etc (The rest of the email above is below after a large space)
>
>
> From: Mike Blais <mlblaisrcr@gmail.com>,
> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 7:58 AM
> To: David Amos
> Subject: Re: I never heard another word from the veterans Howcome? Your
> monetary ties must be too close to that of the RCMP EH?
>
> David, I wish we had money ties... cause then we would have money! LOL
> Sorry, i do not mean to laugh but we are so broke it ain't funny.
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 8:41 AM, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos
> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 6:41 AM
> To: info@canadianveteransadvocacy.
> minister-ministre@vac-acc.gc.
> stoffp1@parl.gc.ca ; Mackap ; Wayne.Lang ; steve.graham
> Cc: maritime_malaise ; news@hilltimes.com ; shawn_apel@cbc.ca ; news@ctv.ca
> Subject: I never heard another word from the veterans Howcome? Your
> monetary
> ties must be too close to that of the RCMP EH?
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
>
>
> Sylvain Chartrand Canada Remembers
> http://www.cbc.ca/canada/
>
> CBC News - Prince Edward Island - Veterans Affairs union fights higher
> penalties
> www.cbc.ca
>
> The union representing Department of Veterans Affairs employees says
> it will fight any efforts to increase the penalties against staffers
> who share confidential information about veterans.
> .
> November 11, 2010 at 3:43am · .
> Sylvain Chartrand From: Cpl (Ret) Sylvain Chartrand CD
> Sent: November-11-10 1:28 AM
> To: 'thauvey@psac.com'; 'colesk@psac.com'
> Cc: ACC Deputy Minister Suzanne Tining; Blackburn.J@parl.gc.ca;
> 'minister-ministre@vac-acc.gc.
> (BlackJ@parl.gc....ca); ACC Ombudsman info@ombudsman-veterans.gc.ca;
> ACC Sophie Doucet; 'Walter.Natynczyk@forces.gc.ca
> 'Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca'; 'StoffP0@parl.gc.ca'; 'stoffp1@parl.gc.ca';
> Louise Wallis; 'guy.parent@ombudsman-
> 'mgurney@nationalpost.com'; shawn_apel@cbc.ca; Media CBC
> shawn_apel@cbc.ca; Media Hils Time (news@hilltimes.com); Engel,
> Shirlee (Ottawa News)
> Subject: Veterans Affairs union fights higher penalties
> Importance: High
>
> Mme,
>
> Repeat please.......
>
> "It's the second time in the last month and a half that he [Blackburn]
> is blasting his own employees," said Yvan Thauvette, head of the Union
> of Veterans Affairs Employees. "As a union representative, I would say
> that he will probably find us in his way because he cannot go from
> one-day suspension to 30-day suspension and losing your job."
>
> I hope it’s not that last time he reprimands your staff. Well first,
> of all, he is doing his JOB CORRECTLY and your employee ARE NOT, I SAY
> AGAIN, ARE NOT.
>
> Lets count how many time your employees have breach the privacy and
> other laws etc etc etc.....
>
> I’ve told you many times, My Blackburn, militarize VAC, get
> Military/Vets in there, and we will take care of the rest. Bottom
> line, get in Combat Arms RSM (Chief Warrant Officers), ask the CDS
> (Gen Walter.Natynczyk) about what is an RSM.
>
> Well, if you don’t do you job right, HE better go from a one day
> suspension to a 30 day suspension, or would you rather be sent to
> Afghanistan. We can have an office opened over there and they can do
> foot patrols. OH NO, a grievance would be raised , too hard on your
> poor little feet.... Hon Peter McKay and CDS would help you out on
> this.
>
> http://www.uvae-seac.ca/
>
> Cpl (Ret) Sylvain Chartrand CD
> A proud reservist who was at war with DND/CF and fought for his
> rights, for all other reservists, and made DND/CF change
> UNFICYP 90 Roto 54
>
> UNPROFOR 93 Roto 1See More
> November 11, 2010 at 3:44am · LikeUnlike · 1Loading....Sylvain
> Chartrand
>
> From: Sylvain Chartrand []
> Sent: November-11-10 2:23 AM
> To: 'thauvey@psac.com'; 'colesk@psac.com'
> Cc: 'Greg Kerr ( MP for West Nova )'; 'Hon. Peter G MacKay ( Minister
> of National Defence )'; ACC Deputy Minister Suzanne Tining;
> Blackburn.J...@parl.gc.ca; 'minister-ministre@vac-acc.gc.
> Minister (BlackJ@parl.gc.ca); ACC Ombudsman
> info@ombudsman-veterans.gc.ca; ACC Sophie Doucet;
> 'Walter.Natynczyk@forces.gc.ca
> 'StoffP0@parl.gc.ca'; 'stoffp1@parl.gc.ca'; Louise Wallis;
> 'guy.parent@ombudsman-
> 'news@ctv.ca'; Media CBC shawn_apel@cbc.ca; Media Hils Time
> (news@hilltimes.com); Engel, Shirlee (Ottawa News)
> Subject: RE: How does the word "ILLEGAL" sound?????
>
> Rob,
>
> I’m in touch with the RCMP about this.... More to follow...
>
> Bye The way Mme Yvan Thauvette. I think you and your employees have
> forgotten your Values and Ethics Code for the Public Service.
>
> http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pubs_
>
> Failure to Comply
> A public servant who does not comply with the requirements of this
> Code is subject to appropriate disciplinary action, up to and
> including termination of employment.
>
> By the way, Mme Yvan Thauvette, you don’t yell too much about getting
> Vets, getting kicked out of VAC Staff????
>
> A little military knowledge, if you are to write be back, address me
> as Cpl (Ret) Sylvain Chartrand CD.
>
> Cpl (Ret) Sylvain Chartrand CD
> A proud reservist who was at war with DND/CF and fought for his
> rights, for all other reservists, and made DND/CF change
> UNFICYP 90 Roto 54
>
> UNPROFOR 93 Roto 1See More
> November 11, 2010 at 4:25am · LikeUnlike.Jim Newton The Review and
> Appeal Board is a big part of the problem! I have been fighting them
> for 11 years! And they refute the testimony of a MGen for no reason!
>
> November 11, 2010 at 5:18am · LikeUnlike.
> David Raymond Amos
> Perhaps Mr Chartrand and I should talk ASAP? My number is 902 800 0369
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dennis
> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 2:30 PM
> To: 'David Amos'
> Cc: 'maritime_malaise'
> Subject: RE: I never heard another word from the veterans Howcome? Your
> monetary ties must be too close to that of the RCMP EH?
>
> Not interested David
> Thanks
>
> Dennis
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
> Sent: November-12-11 3:04 PM
> To: dmanuge@eastlink.ca
> Cc: maritime_malaise
> Subject: Fwd: I never heard another word from the veterans Howcome? Your
> monetary ties must be too close to that of the RCMP EH?
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/
> html
>
> http://natoveterans.org/en/
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:41:39 -0400
> Subject: Re: I never heard another word from the veterans Howcome?
> Your monetary ties must be too close to that of the RCMP EH?
> To: Mike Blais <mlblaisrcr@gmail.com>, "Wayne.Lang"
> < Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, toewsv1
> < toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>
> Cc: "Gilles. Blinn" <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Mackap
> < Mackap@parl.gc.ca>, stoffp1 <stoffp1@parl.gc.ca>, "Nycole.Turmel"
> < Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca>
>
> Well you can bet that I ain't LAUGHING
>
> Read something for a change will ya? It costs nothing to read this
> simple pdf file.
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.
> f
>
> BTW I am this David Amos
>
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 21:14:11 -0300
> Subject: Mr Aguirre I just called from 902 800 0369
> To: Gary@aguirrelawfirm.com
> Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>,
> NYAG.Pressoffice@oag.state.ny.
> < matt.taibbi@rollingstone.com>
>
> FYI I am the unamed Whistleblower that Mr Nester of the SEC mentioned
> in 2009 who is the link from Putnam investments and Madoff matter
>
> To support , my allegations first and foremost Eric Schneiderman
> should see that Eliot Spitzer testified on the very day he thanked me
> for the info in November of 2003.
>
> Please notice the transcripts and webcasts went of th Senate hearings
> "poof' not long after I made the congressman Ron Paul and legions of
> others well aware of their existence as he bitched about such things
> whilst running for the GOP endorsement to run for president in 2007.
> The records of the hearings were deleted in late fall 2007 just as all
> the subprime mortgages began to smell bad.
>
> http://banking.senate.gov/
> ng_ID=90f8e691-9065-4f8c-a465-
>
> Now check the dates on the letters in this file page 13 in particular
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.
> f
>
> BTW I just discovered you and your client Darcy Flynn byway of these
> news reports
>
> http://www.rollingstone.com/
> he-secs-defense-20110823
>
> "My first clue came when I called the SEC before the story came out
> and asked them about the allegations by SEC attorney/whistleblower
> Darcy Flynn. I sent them a detailed questionnaire, both about the
> document disposal and the mini cover-up among SEC higher-ups like
> former Goldman executive Adam Storch (who was not sure he should "take
> on this exposure voluntarily," because the SEC FOIA officer told him
> there "might be criminal liability"). Then, when I called back, I
> expected them to deny the whole thing and trash Flynn as an unreliable
> disgruntled employee.
>
> They did none of that. Instead, to my amazement, SEC spokesperson John
> Nester copped to the document destruction right away when I got him on
> the phone. When I asked him how long it had been going on, Nester not
> only offered that it had been "at least the early nineties," but
> volunteered, without my even asking about it, that he couldn't be sure
> it hadn't "always been the policy." He didn't deny any of Flynn's
> allegations at all. It was a very weird call - I kept waiting for the
> other shoe to drop, and it never did."
>
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/
> -whistle-blower-alleges.html
>
> http://www.rollingstone.com/
> -crimes-20110817
>
> http://aguirrelawfirm.com/
>
> I can be found all over the web as well but I am latgely mentioned by
> people trying hard to impeach my character. However it is the
> docmentation that is truly important not the malicious spin on them.
>
> A portion of the email below can be found within the following link or
> simply Google Amos and Madoff and anyone can find it
>
> This is not my blog
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>
> Notice Mr Nestor of the SEC?
>
> These are more informative blogs of his about me
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
> t.html
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
> t-3.html
>
>
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "STAINTON-JAMES, Angela" <STAINTONJAMESA@parliament.uk>
>> > To: "'David Amos'" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 5:50 AM
>> > Subject: RE: So what is the Conservative MP Hugh Robertson gonna do
>> > about people in his riding torturing people on the Internet? In Canada
>> > such slander is a crime EH Vic Toews?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Dear David
>> >
>> > Thank you for your e-mail addressed to Hugh Robertson. Your e-mail
>> > has come through to Hugh's constituency office when, clearly, you need
>> > his Department. Sadly, I do not have an e-mail address for him but
>> > the telephone number of the Department of Media Culture and Sport is
>> > 020 7211 6200 and they should be able to provide you with the
>> > necessary information.
>> >
>> > Thank you for writing to Hugh and if you have any problem at all
>> > please do not hesitate to come back to me.
>> >
>> > Best wishes
>> > Angela Stainton-James
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
>> > Sent: 29 May 2010 23:24
>> > To: STAINTON-JAMES, Angela; toewsv1
>> > Cc: RHar100@aol.com; Gilles. Blinn; gilles.moreau; roger. gillies;
>> > rogerduguay21
>> > Subject: So what is the Conservative MP Hugh Robertson gonna do about
>> > people in his riding torturing people on the Internet? In Canada such
>> > slander is a crime EH Vic Toews?
>> >
>> > Need I say that "Satan's Crack Dealer" and his many evil little fans
>> > atacked the wrong pissed of Maritimer in Youtube? Scroll down read
>> > real slow and then call your lawyer or the cops Mr Robertson
>> >
>> > http://www.facebook.com/group.
>> > Richard Coughlan
>> > Faversham, United Kingdom
>> > email RHar100@aol.com
>> > Website:http://youtube.com/
>> > Phone 07935333407
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 15:46:20 -0300
>> > Subject: Mr. Finkelstein I just discovered you and your concerns today
>> > perhaps we should have a long talk ASAP? i an be reached at 506 xxx
>> > xxxx for a couple of days
>> > To: normfinkelstein@gmail.com
>> >
>> > Need I say that I am hounoured that this evil person hates me/
>> >
>> >
> http://baconfat53.blogspot.
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 14:23:46 -0300
>> > Subject: Lets see if the Russians will understand Fwd: We just talked
>> > this what I was trying to relate to the President of Mexico while he
>> > was in Canada
>> > To: info@rusembassy.ca
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 14:19:51 -0300
>> > Subject: We just talked this what I was trying to relate to the
>> > President of Mexico while he was in Canada
>> > To: atperez_lee <atperez_lee@yahoo.com.mx>
>> >
>> > The easiest way to check something about my concerns quickly is to go
>> > to the US Senate Banking Committee hearing on November 18th and 20th
>> > 2003 and notice the webcasts and transcripts of a very important
>> > hearing about the financial industry are missing. Please notice the
>> > crook Eliot Spitzer testified on the 20th
>> >
>> >
> http://banking.senate.gov/
> Year=2003
>> >
>> >
>> >
> http://banking.senate.gov/
> ng_ID=102e41a1-f540-4ce5-a701-
>> >
>> >
> http://banking.senate.gov/
> ng_ID=90f8e691-9065-4f8c-a465-
>> >
>> > Now look for Spitzer's answer to me on page 13 of this pdf file
>> >
>> > http://www.scribd.com/doc/
>> >
>> > The easy answer to your next question is YES I am the the guy nobody
>> > will talk about. so perhaps you should for the benefit of your
>> > concerns and pocketbook. (Google David Amos and Wendy Olsen to see how
>> > far down the rabbbit hole I can take anyone)
>> >
>> > I explained some of it a year ago on many talk shows and nobody cared.
>> > Listen here if you wish then go figure whom you should trust.
>> >
>> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>> >
>> > If nothing else have laugh at my espense and Google this expression
>> > "Nobody will say my name"
>> >
>> >
>> > Here is just one of the many reasons why
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
>> > Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 9:21 AM
>> > To: David Amos; USANYS-MADOFF; Litt, Marc (USANYS)
>> > Cc: webo; vasilescua@sec.gov; friedmani@sec.gov; krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
>> > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> >
>> > Thank you for your response.
>> >
>> > Wendy Olsen
>> > Victim Witness Coordinator
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
>> > Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:48 AM
>> > To: USANYS-MADOFF; Olsen, Wendy (USANYS); Litt, Marc (USANYS)
>> > Cc: webo; vasilescua@sec.gov; friedmani@sec.gov; krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
>> > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> >
>> > Ms Olsen
>> >
>> > Thank you for keeping me informed.
>> >
>> > Yes unseal all my emails with all their attachments immediately and
>> > make certain that the US Attorny's office finally practices full
>> > disclosurement as to who I am and what my concerns are as per the Rule
>> > of Law within a purported democracy.
>> >
>> > As you folks all well know I am not a shy man and I have done nothing
>> > wrong. It appears to me that bureacratic people only use the right to
>> > privacy of others when it suits their malicious ends in order to
>> > protect their butts from impreacment, litigation and prosecution.
>> >
>> > The people in the US Attorney's Office and the SEC etc are very well
>> > aware that I protested immediately to everyone I could think of when
>> > the instant I knew that my correspondences went under seal and Madoff
>> > pled guilty so quickly and yet another cover up involing my actions
>> > was under full steam. Everybody knows that.the US Government has been
>> > trying to keep my concerns about the rampant public corruption a
>> > secret for well over seven long years. However now that a lot of
>> > poeple and their countries in general are losing a lot of money people
>> > are beginning to remember just exactly who I am and what i did
>> > beginning over seven years ago..
>> >
>> > Veritas Vincit
>> > David Raymond Amos
>> > 506 756 8687
>> >
>> > P.S. For the record Obviously I pounced on these Yankee bastards as
>> > soon as the newsrag in Boston published this article on the web last
>> > night.
>> >
>> > http://www.bostonherald.com/
>> > ormat=&page=2&listingType=biz#
>> >
>> > Notice that Nester just like everyone else would not say my name? It
>> > is because my issues surrounding both Madoff and are NOT marketing
>> > timing They are as you all well know money laundering, fraud,
>> > forgery, perjury, securites fraud, tax fraud, Bank fraud, illegal
>> > wiretappping and Murder amongst other very serious crimes.
>> >
>> > "SEC spokesman John Nester dismissed similarities between Markopolos
>> > and Scannell's cases as "not a valid comparison."
>> >
>> > He said the SEC determined the market-timing by Putnam clients that
>> > Scannell reported didn't violate federal law. Nester said the SEC only
>> > acted after another tipster alleged undisclosed market-timing by some
>> > Putnam insiders.
>> >
>> > Scannell, now a crusader for SEC reforms, isn't surprised the agency
>> > is in hot water again.
>> >
>> > Noting that several top SEC officials have gone on to high-paying
>> > private-sector jobs, he believes hopes for future employment impact
>> > investigations. "It's a distinct disadvantage to make waves before you
>> > enter the private sector," Scannell said."
>> >
>> > --- On Mon, 3/30/09, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S
> OFFICE
>> > SDNY
>> > To: NesterJ@sec.gov, letterstoeditor@bostonherald.
>> > < oig@sec.gov>, Thunter@tribune.com, david@davidmyles.com,
>> > ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca, "Dan Fitzgerald" <danf@danf.net>
>> > Cc: dsheehan@bakerlaw.com, dspelfogel@bakerlaw.com,
>> > mc@whistleblowers.org, gkachroo@mccarter.com,
>> > david.straube@accenture.com, gurdip.s.sahota@accenture.com,
>> > benjamin_mcmurray@ao.uscourts.
>> > Date: Monday, March 30, 2009, 10:00 PM
>> >
>> > Need I say BULLSHIT?
>> >
>> > http://www.bostonherald.com/
>> > ormat=&page=2&listingType=biz#
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:03:13 -0300
>> > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S
> OFFICE
>> > SDNY
>> > To: Russ.Stanton@latimes.com, meredith.goodman@latimes.com,
>> > ninkster@navigantconsulting.
>> > Cc: firstselectmanffld@town.
>> > editor@whatsupfairfield.com, info@csiworld.org, jacques_poitras
>> > < jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:40:55 -0300
>> > Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> > To: gmacnamara@town.fairfield.ct.
>> > "Paul. Harpelle" <Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca>, Jason Keenan
>> > < jason.keenan@icann.org>, Kandalaw <Kandalaw@mindspring.com>
>> > Cc: info@grahamdefense.org, fbinhct@leo.gov
>> >
>> > From: "Peck,Dave" <DPeck@town.fairfield.ct.us>
>> > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:32:32 -0400
>> > Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT
>> > INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > I will be unavailable until 4/1/09.
>> >
>> > Deputy Chief MacNamara will be in charge while I am away.
>> >
>> > He can be reached at 254-4831 or email him at
>> > gmacnamara@town.fairfield.ct.
>> >
>> > I will not be checking emails or cell phone messages.
>> >
>> > Thank you,
>> >
>> > Chief Dave Peck
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:32:18 -0300
>> > Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> > To: dpeck@town.fairfield.ct.us, edit@ctpost.com, bresee@courant.com
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:19:35 -0300
>> > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> > To: dtnews@telegraph.co.uk
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: USANYS-MADOFF
>> > Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 3:06 PM
>> > To: DAVID.RAYMOND.AMOS@GMAIL.COM
>> > Subject: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> >
>> > In United States v. Bernard L. Madoff, 09 Cr. 213 (DC), the Court
>> > received a request from NBC and ABC to unseal all correspondence from
>> > victims that has been submitted in connection with the case.
>> >
>> > This includes your email to the Government.
>> >
>> > If the correspondence from victims is unsealed, the victim's personal
>> > identifying information including name, address, telephone number and
>> > email address (to the extent it was included on the correspondence)
>> > will become public. The Government must submit a response to the
>> > request by NBC and ABC by Tuesday, March 31, 2009. Please let us know
>> > whether you consent to the full disclosure of your correspondence, or
>> > whether you wish to have your correspondence remain sealed for privacy
>> > or other reasons.
>> > If you wish to have your correspondence remain sealed, please let us
>> > know the reason. We will defend your privacy to the extent that we
>> > can. Thank you.
>> >
>> > I looks like the US attorney in New York finally has to unseal my
>> > emails that you dudes have been sitting on for quite some time for no
>> > reason I will ever understand other than you are just a bunch of
>> > chickenshits.
>> >
>> > I know NBC, ABC, your blogger buddies or any other media wacko will
>> > never say my name but the pissed off folks that lost a lot of money
>> > with Bernie Baby just may ask how the hell I am EH?
>> >
>> > Veritas Vincit
>> > David Raymond Amos
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:48:50 -0300
>> > Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
>> > KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>> > To: Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:29:42 -0300
>> > Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
>> > KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>> > To: PChavkin@mintz.com
>> > Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: "Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)" <Wendy.Olsen@usdoj.gov>
>> > Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:08:04 -0400
>> > Subject: RE: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
>> > KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>> > To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> >
>> > On March 10, 2009, the Honorable Denny Chin provided the following
>> > guidance for victims who wish to be heard at the plea proceeding on
>> > March 12, 2009 at 10:00 a.m.:
>> >
>> > Judge Chin stated that there are two issues that the Court will
>> > consider at the hearing: (1) whether to accept a guilty plea from the
>> > defendant to the eleven-count Criminal Information filed by the
>> > Government, which provides for a maximum sentence of 150 years'
>> > imprisonment; and (2) whether the defendant should be remanded or
>> > released on conditions of bail, if the Court accepts a guilty plea.
>> > Judge Chin also stated that, at the hearing on March 12, 2009, he will
>> > conduct a plea allocution of the defendant and then will announce
>> > whether the Court intends to accept the plea. At that time, the Court
>> > will solicit speakers who disagree with the Court's intended ruling.
>> >
>> > Assuming the defendant pleads guilty and his plea is accepted by
>> > the Court, the Court intends to allow the Government and defense
>> > counsel to speak on the issue of bail. The Court will then announce
>> > its intended ruling on that issue. The Court will then invite
>> > individuals who disagree with the proposed ruling on bail to be heard.
>> >
>> > The Court noted that there will be opportunity for victims to be
>> > heard in the future on the subjects of sentencing, forfeiture and
>> > restitution in advance of any sentencing of the defendant. The Court
>> > also noted that it is not appropriate for victims who wish to speak
>> > concerning sentencing issues to be heard at the March 12, 2009
>> > proceeding.
>> >
>> > A link to the a transcript of the March 10, 2009 Court hearing can
>> > be found on the website of the United States Attorney's Office for the
>> > Southern District of New York:
>> >
>> > http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/nys
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
>> > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 10:56 AM
>> > To: usanys.madoff@usdoj.gov
>> > Subject: FW: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
>> > KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
>> > Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 12:58 PM
>> > To: horwitzd@dicksteinshapiro.com; Nardoza, Robert (USANYE);
>> > USAMA-Media (USAMA); Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
>> > Cc: oig
>> > Subject: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and KPMG
>> > etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>> >
>> > horwitzd@dicksteinshapiro.com
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: "Sartory, Thomas J." <TSartory@goulstonstorrs.com>
>> > Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 07:41:20 -0500
>> > Subject: RE: I did talk the lawyers Golub and Flumenbaum tried to
>> > discuss Bernie Madoff and KPMG etc before sending these emails
>> > To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> >
>> >
>> > Dear Mr. Amos,
>> >
>> > I am General Counsel at Goulston & Storrs. Your email below to
>> > Messers. Rosensweig and Reisch has been forwarded to me for response.
>> > While it's not clear what type of assistance, if any, you seek from
>> > Goulston % Storrs, please be advised that we are not in a position to
>> > help you. Please do not send further communications to any of our
>> > attorneys. We will not be able to respond, and your communications
>> > will not be protected by the attorney-client privilege.
>> >
>> > We wish you well in the pursuit of your concerns.
>> >
>> > Sincerely,
>> >
>> > Thomas J. Sartory
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: David Amos [mailto:
>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 8:18 PM
>> > To: Rosensweig, Richard J.; info@LAtaxlawyers.com; Reisch, Alan M.;
>> > reed@hbsslaw.com
>> > Subject: Fwd: I did talk the lawyers Golub and Flumenbaum tried to
>> > discuss Bernie Madoff and KPMG etc before sending these emails
>> >
>> > Perhaps somebody should call me back now. EH?
>> >
>> > UK Parliament Disclaimer:
>> > This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have
>> > received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your
>> > system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted.
>> > This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted
>> > for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos
> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 3:11 PM
> To: rotorhead@ns.sympatico.ca ; capt@islandtelecom.com ;
> vinapieroway@nf.sympatico.ca ; seankis@rogers.com ; info@champlaw.ca ;
> thehouse@cbc.ca ; gordjenkins@gmail.com ; cbellamy@sympatico.ca ;
> d.c.brunton@sympatico.ca ; dmanuge@eastlink.ca ; Mike Blais ; Wayne.Lang ;
> pm@pm.gc.ca ; toewsv1@parl.gc.ca ; Gilles. Blinn ; Mackap@parl.gc.ca ;
> stoffp1@parl.gc.ca ; Nycole.Turmel
> Cc: maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca ; nichor
> Subject: Perhaps his fellow veterans should ask Sean Bruyea if it was my
> name or Brent Babcock's that rang the right bells to cause the Harper Govt
> to settle so quickly?
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
> Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 07:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
> Subject: Attn Sean Bruyea Does the name Brent Babcock within Veterns
> Affairs ring any bells?
> To: seankis@rogers.com, info@champlaw.ca
> Cc: thehouse@cbc.ca
>
> If not at least a former intelligence officer should know who these
> dudes are and why Petey Mackay is very nervous about what I am up to
> these days.
>
> Just Dave
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 12,009
> Domain Name gc.ca ? (Canada)
> IP Address 131.137.245.# (Defence Research Establishment-Ottawa)
> ISP Defense Research Establishment
> Location
> Continent : North America
> Country : Canada (Facts)
> State/Region : Ontario
> City : Ottawa
> Lat/Long : 45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
> Language English (Canada) en-ca
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 6.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0;
> Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR
> 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)Javascript
> version 1.3
> Monitor
> Resolution : 1024 x 768
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Sep 28 2010 12:48:22 pm
> Last Page View Sep 28 2010 12:48:22 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL
> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time Sep 28 2010 11:48:22 am
> Visit Number 12,009
>
> BTW You pissed me off when you asked the same question bureaucrats ask
> three times
>
> In my humble opinion the better question for you to ask after you quit
> interupting with the same dumb question would how can I help you My
> number is 902 800 0369 perhaps your lawyer should check the pdf hereto
> attached and try to talk to a very serious whisteblower EH?
>
> http://www.seanbruyea.com/
>
> FYI check this lawyer's work about your Fed buddies
>
> http://www.waterwarcrimes.com/
>
> New Deputy Minister of Justice - Myles Kirvan
>
> Deputy Minister of Justice in a nation that is covering up a major
> international crime is a dangerous job. Astute observers are asking:
> How long will Canada's newest Deputy Minister of Justice and Deputy
> Attorney General, Mr. Myles Kirvan last in his new job?
>
> Formerly Associate Deputy Minister of Public Safety, Mr. Kirvan
> becomes Deputy Minister of Justice and Deputy Attorney General of
> Canada, effective April 6.
>
> Mr. Kirvan replaces outgoing Deputy Minister, John Sims, Q.C., who was
> caught making fraudulent submissions in the WaterWarCrimes lawsuit in
> Canada's Federal Court, who refused to retract the submission and who
> suddenly resigned, effective April 1, 2010, a few short weeks after
> his misconduct was broadcast internationally via several whistle
> blowing sites on the internet, such as Paul Drockton, Jeff Rense and
> David Icke. Canada's mainstream media ignored the story.
>
> As Associate Deputy Minister of Public Safety, (RCMP) from October 1,
> 2007 to date, Mr. Kirvan would probably have been privy to the secret
> police files containing the identity of the Water War Criminals - a
> group that Canadian legal authorities have consistently refused to
> investigate and prosecute.
>
> We at the WaterWarCrimes crimes web site and blog welcome the
> appointment of Mr. Myles Kirvan to the position of Deputy Minister of
> Justice and Attorney General for Canada. It is always refreshing to
> see a new face and our expectation of common human decency, justice
> and fair and equitable treatment from our fellow human beings is ever
> present nothwithstanding the sinister, devilish, and corrupt record of
> Canadian and British Columbia Government employees to date.
>
> In 1991, Myles Kirvan began his Public Service career in the
> Department of Justice as General Counsel, Federal-Provincial Relations
> Office. He went on to serve in the Department of Justice in various
> capacities including Senior Advisor to the Associate Deputy Minister,
> Public Law; General Counsel, Dispute Resolution Services; Senior
> General Counsel, Legal Services, Health Canada; and from 2003-2007,
> Assistant Deputy Minister, Business and Regulatory Law.
>
> Prior to joining the Public Service of Canada, Myles Kirvan served as
> an advisor to Ministers. He has served as Legislative Assistant to the
> Solicitor General of Canada; Senior Policy Advisor to the Minister of
> National Revenue; Judicial Affairs Advisor and then Chief of Staff for
> the Minister of Justice and Attorney General. In 1993 Myles Kirvan
> served as Deputy Chief of Staff to the Prime Minister.
>
> Myles Kirvan is a member of the Law Society of Upper Canada a.k.a. the
> Province of Ontario. He holds a B.A. from Carleton University and an
> LL.B. from the University of Ottawa.
>
> We will be watching Mr. Kirvan VERY closely and keep out readers
> posted on the conduct of Canada's Ministry of Justice under Deputy
> Attorney General, Myles Kirvan.
>
>
> Did Deputy Minister of Justice John Sims Commit Fraud?
> Was He Fired??
>
> John Sims, Q.C.
>
> John Sims is Canada's Deputy Minister of Justice. He and his
> subordinates are supposed to tell the truth in Court proceedings but
> they do not.
>
> Mr. Sims has falsely, recklessly, argued in the Federal Court, that
> the lawsuit filed in the Federal Court under Action T-95-09, by Ms.
> Gibbs and Mr. Carten, as joint plaintiffs, is a re-litigation of an
> application, filed by Mr. Carten, acting alone, in Octrober, 2007, in
> the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Kelowna Registry, Action No.
> 77000.
>
> This argument by Mr. John Sims is nonsense and we think it is a
> deliberate fraud.
>
> The two claims are entirely different.
>
> The claim filed in Kelowna was an application for an injunction to
> restrain the Provincial Court judges in British Columbia from the
> dealing with the matter of the enforcement of the accumulated arrears
> of child support that now total close to $400,000 that Mr. Carten
> supposedly owes to his ex-wife as a result of the deliberately
> excessive child support payment order made against him by former BC
> Deupty Attorney General Robert Edwards. The Provincial Court Judges
> will not permit Mr. Carten to call necessary or useful witnesses and
> have been trying to railroad him.
>
> By contrast, the claim in the Federal Court is a claim seeking
> compensatory damages against the Government of Canada and the
> Government of British Colubmia and several others for conspiriing to
> cause harm to Mr. Carten and Ms. Gibbs because they were connected to
> Sun Belt Water Inc. and deemed to be assisting Sun Belt Water Inc. on
> a path that would reveal who the criminals behind the WaterWarCrimes
> were.
>
> We have accused John Sims, Q.C., the Deputy Attorney General for
> Canada of intentionally misleading the Court and he has not responded
> to our allegation.
>
> Silence is agreement.
>
> We sent our allegation to every member of the House of Commons and
> Senate of Canada, by e-mail on December 25, 2009, and on December 30,
> 2009, before the members returned to their offices, Prime Minister
> Harper suspended (prorogued) Parliament. Is this just another one of
> those strange co-incidences like the nine dead judges?
>
>
> John Sims Deputy Minister of Justice - Professional Background
>
> John Sims
>
> In 2009 the Government of Canada awarded Mr. Sims The Outstanding
> Achievement Award. The award is considered to be the most prestigious
> award in the Public Service, this award is presented to senior public
> service employees who have distinguished themselves by a sustained
> commitment to excellence.
>
> The Government of Canada made the following comments about Mr. Sims at
> the time of his receiving the award.
>
> "Mr. Sims received a Bachelor of Arts (Honours) in History and
> Economics and a Bachelor of Laws from Queen's University. He was
> called to the Ontario Bar in 1973 and joined the Public Service of
> Canada in 1977 as legal counsel to Transport Canada.
>
> As a lawyer, Mr. Sims has provided high-quality legal advice to
> ministers and the Government of Canada on some of the most complex and
> sensitive policy and operational priorities of the government, such as
> aviation safety, war crimes, labour relations and national security
> (including as the first head of legal services at the Canadian
> Security Intelligence Service). His advice has always reflected the
> highest standards of integrity and ethical behaviour and has been
> informed by the broader context and potential implications".
>
> For the full text of the remarks about Mr. Sims go to
> http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/arp/
>
> We ask the reader:
>
> If Mr. Sims has a high reputation for integrity why did he mislead the
> Federal Court?
>
> It Sure Looks Like John Sims Was Fired?
>
> Referring to whether a high level Ottawa minister will resign or be
> fired, CTV Ottawa bureau chief Robert Fife recently stated:
>
> “In this town nobody voluntarily resigns,” Mr. Fife said. “They’ve got
> a limo, and a staff, and they love this sort of stuff. She’s not going
> to give it up.”
>
> Link to the Fife quote:
> http://www.theglobeandmail.
>
> Based on Robert Fife's reputation for logical thinking and other
> factors outlined above, we think that John Sims was fired.
>
> This web site and our Chronology of events at
> http://waterwarcrimes.
> John Sims and how he misled Prothonotary Lafreniere of Canada's
> Federal Court in February 2010. Then, in the last week of February
> and the first week of March 2010, the story of the corruption by John
> Sims begain circulating around the planet courtesy of some prominent
> internationally recognized whistle blowers, such as Jeff Rense, Paul
> Drockton, David Icke and many others who helped get the truth out
> along with John Sims.
>
> On March 15, 2010, John Sims, Q.C., Canada's Deputy Minister of
> Justice and Deputy Attorney General tendered his resigntion effective
> April 1, 2010.
>
>
> Sean Bruyea
> Sean lives in the Ottawa area and can be reached at the following
> telephone number and email address:
> Telephone Number: (613) 825-8002
> Email: seankis@rogers.com
>
> http://www.seanbruyea.com/wp-
>
> http://champlaw.ca/8801/19601.
>
> Champ & Associates
> 43 Florence Street
> Ottawa, ON K2P 0W6
> Phone: (613) 237-4740
> Fax: (613) 232-2680
> info@champlaw.ca
>
> --- On Mon, 9/27/10, David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca> wrote:
>
>
> From: David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
> Subject: Here is some more info for the PC wannabe MLAs to chew on EH
> Wally Stiles?
> To: carl@carlkillen.ca, info@craigleonard.ca, sherry38@nbnet.nb.ca,
> vote@mcblais.ca, fredalbertpc@hotmail.com, yvonbon@ca.inter.net,
> wm@aibn.com, martinecoulombe55@hotmail.com, danfour@myginch.com,
> oldmaison@yahoo.com, nbpolitico@gmail.com, spinks08@hotmail.com,
> nb.premier@gmail.com, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca, info@philipchiasson.com,
> janice.brun@rogers.com, dfortunat@yahoo.com, brucehickey1@hotmail.com,
> elijos@bellaliant.net, dmaltais@rogers.com, bathurst@nancymckay.ca,
> greg.byrne@gnb.ca, shawn.graham@gnb.ca, kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca,
> Bernard.LeBlanc@gnb.ca, Brian.kenny@gnb.ca, rick.doucet@gnb.ca,
> rick.brewer@gnb.ca, donald.arseneault@gnb.ca, rick.miles@gnb.ca,
> wally.stiles@gnb.ca, victor.boudreau@gnb.ca,
> rchedore@mosherchedore.ca, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca,
> Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> Received: Monday, September 27, 2010, 2:47 PM
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:30:01 -0300
> Subject: RE: Email from the BHP Billiton Chairman
> To: David.ALWARD@gnb.ca, jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca,
> tomp.young@atlanticradio.
> bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, atlbf@nb.aibn.com, akapoor@globeandmail.com,
> nmacadam@globeandmail.com, vepp@globeandmail.com
> Cc: fpletters@nationalpost.com, jlsteve@ucalgary.ca,
> "oldmaison@yahoo.com" <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, danfour
> < danfour@myginch.com>, "shawn. graham" <shawn.graham@gnb.ca>,
> "jack.macdougall" <jack.macdougall@greenparty.ca
> < Jack.Keir2@gnb.ca>, krisaustin <krisaustin@panb.org>
>
> Here is something for some students out west to ponder ASAP EH David
> Alward?
>
> http://www.theglobeandmail.
>
> http://haskayne.ucalgary.ca/
>
> James Stevenson
> Senior Communications Manager
> External Relations
> 403-210-6308
> jlsteve@ucalgary.ca
>
> http://haskayne.ucalgary.ca/
>
> http://www.haskayne.com/bio.
>
> http://opinion.financialpost.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Collins, Susan J (COSEC)" <Susan.J.Collins@bhpbilliton.
> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:23:12 +1000
> Subject: Email to BHP Billiton Chairman's
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Please find attached a letter from Mr Jac Nasser, Chairman of BHP Billiton
>
> Susan Collins
> Company Secretariat
> BHP Billiton | 180 Lonsdale St | Melbourne Vic 3000 |Australia
> T: +61 3 9609 2654 | M: +61 427 713 994 | F: +61 3 9609 3290
> E: susan.j.collins@bhpbilliton.
> <<Amos D 2010 09 14.pdf>>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
>> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 8:36 AM
>> To: pr@potashcorp.com; Podwika@potashcorp.com;
>> fosterd@bennettjones.ca; corporate.relations@
>> lgold.blcanada@b-l.com; shawn. graham; David.ALWARD@gnb.ca;
>> krisaustin; jacques_poitras@cbc.ca; cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca;
>> tomp.young@atlanticradio.
>> bruce.northrup@gnb.ca; atlbf@nb.aibn.com; akapoor@globeandmail.com;
>> nmacadam@globeandmail.com; vepp@globeandmail.com;
>> potash@mackenziepartners.com; contactus@
>> rick.hancox; Bernard.LeBlanc; Liebenberg, Andre;
>> mclellana@bennettjones.com; MooreR; danfour; oldmaison@yahoo.com;
>> Harris, Brendan; Dean.Buzza; Gilles. Blinn
>> Cc: wcoady; michel.desneiges@sade-els.org; producers@stu.ca;
>> WaterWarCrimes; Penny Bright; tony; Nasser, Jacques
>> Subject: Fwd: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack
>> of ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before
>> you people buy much stock in their stock eh?
>>
>> With ANOTHER election in the near future I see no need to explain my
>> issues again about theexploitation of our natural resources to a
>> bunch of sneaky lawyers.(everyboy shoul checkout the pdf hereto
>> attache) especially our former Deputy Prime Minister Lanslide Annie
>> McLelllan an the RCMP thought they knew everything seven years ago and
>> did nothing let alone call me back just like you an your many
>> conservative cohorts NEVER did EH Brucy Baby Northrup? (902 800 0369
>> Notice my new contact number? You an the RCMP can forget Werner Bock's
>> now)
>>
>> Clearly there is no need for politicians to try to be confidential
>> with mean old me when the Globe and Mail loves spiling the beans
>> sometimes ou woul think those unethical journlists woul know that
>> simple truths spoken amongst common folk about corrupt politicians
>> have a good habit of coming to the surface sooner or later anyway EH?
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>>
>
> This message and any attached files may contain information that is
> confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use
> by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or
> the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended
> recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and
> that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment
> is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information
> therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the
> sender immediately and delete the message.
>
> --- On Mon, 9/13/10, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Subject: How is your conscience and sense of ethical conduct doing now
> ladies?
> To: Jane.McAloon@bhpbilliton.com, Susan.J.Collins@bhpbilliton.
> Cc: "william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.
> "Dean.Buzza" <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Date: Monday, September 13, 2010, 7:57 PM
>
>
> Jane McAloon (Group Company Secretary) BEc (Hons), LLB, GDipGov, FCIS
> Term of office: Jane McAloon was appointed Group Company Secretary in
> July 2007 and joined the BHP Billiton Group in September 2006 as
> Company Secretary for BHP Billiton Limited.
> Skills and experience: Prior to joining BHP Billiton, Jane McAloon
> held the position of Company Secretary and Group Manager External and
> Regulatory Services in the Australian Gas Light Company. She
> previously held various State and Commonwealth government positions,
> including Director General of the NSW Ministry of Energy and Utilities
> and Deputy Director General for the NSW Cabinet Office, as well as
> working in private legal practice. She is a Fellow of the Institute of
> Chartered Secretaries.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Collins, Susan J (COSEC)" <Susan.J.Collins@bhpbilliton.
> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:23:12 +1000
> Subject: Email to BHP Billiton Chairman's
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
>
> Please find attached a letter from Mr Jac Nasser, Chairman of BHP
> Billiton
>
> Susan Collins
> Company Secretariat
> BHP Billiton | 180 Lonsdale St | Melbourne Vic 3000 |Australia
> T: +61 3 9609 2654 | M: +61 427 713 994 | F: +61 3 9609 3290
> E: susan.j.collins@bhpbilliton.
>
> <<Amos D 2010 09 14.pdf>>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
>> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 8:36 AM
>> To: pr@potashcorp.com; Podwika@potashcorp.com;
>> fosterd@bennettjones.ca; corporate.relations@
>> lgold.blcanada@b-l.com; shawn. graham; David.ALWARD@gnb.ca;
>> krisaustin; jacques_poitras@cbc.ca; cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca;
>> tomp.young@atlanticradio.
>> bruce.northrup@gnb.ca; atlbf@nb.aibn.com; akapoor@globeandmail.com;
>> nmacadam@globeandmail.com; vepp@globeandmail.com;
>> potash@mackenziepartners.com; contactus@
>> rick.hancox; Bernard.LeBlanc; Liebenberg, Andre;
>> mclellana@bennettjones.com; MooreR; danfour; oldmaison@yahoo.com;
>> Harris, Brendan; Dean.Buzza; Gilles. Blinn
>> Cc: wcoady; michel.desneiges@sade-els.org; producers@stu.ca;
>> WaterWarCrimes; Penny Bright; tony; Nasser, Jacques
>> Subject: Fwd: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack
>> of ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before
>> you people buy much stock in their stock eh?
>>
>> With ANOTHER election in the near future I see no need to explain my
>> issues again about theexploitation of our natural resources to a
>> bunch of sneaky lawyers.(everyboy shoul checkout the pdf hereto
>> attache) especially our former Deputy Prime Minister Lanslide Annie
>> McLelllan an the RCMP thought they knew everything seven years ago and
>> did nothing let alone call me back just like you an your many
>> conservative cohorts NEVER did EH Brucy Baby Northrup? (902 800 0369
>> Notice my new contact number? You an the RCMP can forget Werner Bock's
>> now)
>>
>> Clearly there is no need for politicians to try to be confidential
>> with mean old me when the Globe and Mail loves spiling the beans
>> sometimes ou woul think those unethical journlists woul know that
>> simple truths spoken amongst common folk about corrupt politicians
>> have a good habit of coming to the surface sooner or later anyway EH?
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>>
>
>
> This message and any attached files may contain information that is
> confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use
> by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or
> the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended
> recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and
> that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment
> is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information
> therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the
> sender immediately and delete the message.
>
> With ANOTHER election in the near future I see no need to explain my
> issues again about theexploitation of our natural resources to a
> bunch of sneaky lawyers.(everyboy shoul checkout the pdf hereto
> attache) especially our former Deputy Prime Minister Lanslide Annie
> McLelllan an the RCMP thought they knew everything seven years ago and
> did nothing let alone call me back just like you an your many
> conservative cohorts NEVER did EH Brucy Baby Northrup? (902 800 0369
> Notice my new contact number? You an the RCMP can forget Werner Bock's
> now)
>
> Clearly there is no need for politicians to try to be confidential
> with mean old me when the Globe and Mail loves spiling the beans
> sometimes ou woul think those unethical journlists woul know that
> simple truths spoken amongst common folk about corrupt politicians
> have a good habit of coming to the surface sooner or later anyway EH?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> http://www.bennettjones.com/
>
> http://www.theglobeandmail.
>
> http://beta.images.
>
> http://www.potashcorp.com/
>
> http://www.bhpbilliton.com/bb/
>
> http://www.potashcorp.com/
>
> http://www.corridor.ca/media/
>
> http://www.bennettjones.com/
>
> http://www.robmooremp.com/
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new-
>
> http://www.newbrunswickbeacon.
>
> http://www.
>
> http://www.elements.nb.ca/
>
> http://www.nbmediacoop.org/
>
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Subject: Attn Rob Moir I have read some of your work perhaps you
> should read something from years ago
> To: fundyroyalndp@gmail.com, Moore.R@parl.gc.ca,
> jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca,
> tomp.young@atlanticradio.
> Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, bbixby@burnslev.com,
> david@lutz.nb.ca, drosenblatt@burnslev.com,
> markwright4mp@politician.com
> Cc: fosterd@bennettjones.ca, corporate.relations@
> lgold.blcanada@b-l.com, fbinhct@leo.gov
> Date: Wednesday, April 30, 2008, 9:46 PM
>
>
> First things first meet Lenny Gold, Dougy Foster and Joey Podwika. You
> can be certain that these wicked bastards know exactly who I am and
> are no doubt quite nervous that the Feds have not figured out a way to
> shut me up yet.
>
> Everybody knows that far away corporate lawyers such as these three
> stooges have been making the big score off us dumb Maritimers forever
> and a day and have been laughing their nasty arses off at us all the
> way to their buddies' bank. They appear to fear only one Maritimer and
> that is yours truly. Ask them if I am liar or not as I speak of the
> Bank Fraud Tax Fraud, Securities Fraud and Murders that you are afraid
> to talk about. Shawn Graham should know everthing he partied hardy
> with my G.A.L. Brian Bixby's Law firm in Beantown one year ago and I
> effected an introduction with the lawyer Leonard Gold because that
> very dumb Maritimer came to Beantown to talk to many evil Yankees ten
> times more worldly wise than Shawny Baby ever could be.
>
> Your laments Bobby Baby about lost water really rot my socks. You
> should know I covered that base years ago and everybody just ran away
> scared. Ask the Minister Larry Cannon why I laughed when he gave out a
> little federal gold just before Bernie Lord had the writ dropped in
> 2006 in the provincial election. It was very telling thing just like
> all the money being passed out right now.
>
> I noticed that you and all you NDP pals ignored the fact that I ran in
> that election as well as the Fed one and the one in Nova Scotia
> earlier that year. Yea I saw you and Pat Hannratty ducking out the
> back just as I walked in that night in January of 2006. Why you didn't
> answer my friend Jack's letter either spoke to your personal integrity
> EH? If Rob Moore or none of the Conservatives on the Hill faraway
> won't talk to you just ask the lawyer Smith in Saint John the boss of
> the NB Securities Commission if I didn't raise a little Hell while he
> filled the other lawyer Nicholson's boots in PUB just long enough to
> cram the pipeline through to the trunk while the election was on and I
> was intervening in the pipeline matter in Saint John at the same time
> and Norm Miller and his lawyer ignored my arguments but read my words
> about it all on the web all the same.
>
> Better yet why not have some fun and ask the very strange PCS dudes in
> Sussex why they had my photo posted at the gate and the RCMP were to
> be called if I made an appearance there while I was running against
> your pal John Carty in Fat Fred City. Your clue to their malice is UBS
> and another lawyer named Dave Aufhauser whom I have been battling with
> for six long years. Do you even know who he is? Rest assured Lenny,
> Dougy and Joey do.
>
> Whereas you trust the words of the very malicious CBC or the Irvings
> and not mine read what the CBC were saying one year ago. Then read
> what the local Irving rag wrote about me four god damned years ago.
>
> For the record Bobby Baby I still remember you commenting on the
> trouble I was having with the Feds so that my minor son could return
> to the USA to comfort his mother and how little milk of human kindness
> you have had in your greedy little PHD soul ever since. Can ya tell I
> don't like you not even a little bit?
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new-
>
> Read on Teacher pay particular attention to my words about oil and
> gas.and crossborder public corruption. For the record I have always
> considered the water in Penobsquis a federal matter concerning the NEB
> and if they ignore me then maybe i would take it up in the Federal
> Court. It won't go anywhere though if Maritimers don't finally wise up
> start listening to me.
>
>
> FYI I have started to upload some of my ducument for the public to
> view. They can be found here and there will be a great deal more to
> follow as my time allows.
>
> http://www.scribd.com/people/
>
> This Maritimer Danny Boy Fitzgeral who is studying for his PHD in
> Holland made several interesting blogs about me as he attacked my
> integrity. In the end methinks I may have turned him my way and in
> return I left his school out of my battles.
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>
> Perhaps you should study them sometime EH Teacher? You should take
> careful notice that college degrees mean less than nothing to me. Just
> like any true Maritimer it is fighters, foresters, farmers and
> fishermen I admire not rich snots that do not understand the meaning
> of hard work. That said it does appear that Danny Boy does work very
> hard on his blog. I do know how long such things take and his blog is
> a fine and as fancy as anyones and constantly updated. I particularly
> apprciate the fact he leaves his comments open without moderation.
>
> Also for the record I signed your Fake Left friends' petition.
>
> Penobsquis Deserves Safe Water
>
> 98 Fran Oliver There is no excuse for this situation. A responsible
> provincial government and a responsible corporation would never allow
> local families to bear the financial and social burden, likely
> resulting from a provincial mining operation, while government and
> corporation choke on huge profits.
>
> 99 David Raymond Amos Ask Garth Moore why my picture is posted at the
> gate while I ran for Parliament will ya?
>
> My friends tell me tha the Photo the PCS dudes had posted as some sort
> of criminal the RCMP were watching out for was clipped from the pages
> of the Kings County Record that contained the following articles.
>
> The following email and two deleted blogs can be found within one
> pigheaded Maritimer's blog about government injustice. After the
> Irvings had his pal's Chucky Leblanc' former blog wiped out I had to
> tease and torture him into doing the right thing and allowing just one
> of my comments to stand. Some much for Freedom on Speech on the
> Internet when even Maritime bloggers are unethical EH teacher?
>
> For the record only the Gypsy and Danny Boy fitzgerald have allowed
> all of my comments to stand the test of time and ethics. Thus far so I
> must give credit where credit is due. Your chosen profession such as
> it is should at least understand that EH Mr. Moir?
>
> Here is my last post in the blogs tonight. Obviously I do not pretend
> to be somebody I am not. N'est Pas?
>
> http://gypsy-blog.blogspot.
>
> Veritas Vincit
>
> David Raymond Amos
>
> The following email can be found here
> http://govinjustice.blogspot.
>
> ---- Original Message -----
> From: "McKnight, Gisele" McKnight.Gisele@kingscorecord.
> To: lcampenella@ledger.com
> Cc:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:53 PM
> Subject: David Amos
>
> Hello Lisa,
>
> David Amos asked me to contact you. I met him last June after he became
> an independent (not representing any political party) candidate in our
> federal
> election that was held June 28. He was a candidate in our constituency of
> Fundy (now called Fundy-Royal).
>
> I wrote a profile story about him, as I did all other candidates. That
> story appeared in the Kings County Record June 22. A second story, written
> by one of my reporters, appeared on the same date, which was a report on
> the candidates' debate held June 18.
>
> As I recall David Amos came last of four candidates in the election.
> The winner got 14,997 votes, while Amos got 358.
>
> I have attached the two stories that appeared, as well as a photo
> taken by reporter Erin Hatfield during the debate. I couldn't find the
> photo
> that ran, but this one is very similar.
>
>
> A1-debate A1-amos,David for MP 24.doc debate 2.JPG
>
> Gisele McKnight editor
> Kings County Record
> Sussex, New Brunswick
> Canada
> 506-433-1070
>
>
> Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd
>
> By Erin Hatfield
>
> "If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
> world is all screwed up, rearrange it."
>
> The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
> the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
> watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
> unofficial, theme song for the debate.
>
> The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
> they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
> Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
> chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
> left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
> mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
> the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.
>
> The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was
> organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage
> of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record
> and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.
>
> Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
> responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
> exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
> Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
> other on their answers and criticizing eachothers' party leaders.
> Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
> questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic
> relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
> response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's
> getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."
>
> Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his
> party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but
> well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am
> on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better
> places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters
> shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.
>
> The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At
> one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in
> front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the
> voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According to
> Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and second
> readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted, at
> final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to
> register sex offenders rather than register the property of law
> abiding citizens."
>
> The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and
> women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman
> yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron
> spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.
>
> Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy
> Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You're out of touch," Armstrong
> yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of
> post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged
> Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time,
> anyplace," Armstrong responded.
>
> As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate,
> candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and
> fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making
> process for the June 28 vote.
>
> Cutline – David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his
> favourite possessions—motorcycles.
>
> McKnight/KCR
>
> The Unconventional Candidate
>
> David Amos Isn't Campaigning For Your Vote, But….
>
> By Gisele McKnight
>
> FUNDY—He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
> wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
> that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."
>
> Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot—David Amos.
>
> The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife
> and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from
> running for office in Canada.
>
> One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail
> to meet Elections Canada requirements.
>
> When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his
> favourite place to do so—Fundy.
>
> Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his
> dissatisfaction with politicians.
>
> "I've become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he
> said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."
>
> The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in
> 1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he
> needed to change his life.
>
> "I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that
> sometimes in midlife."
>
> So Amos, who'd lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners
> motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952
> Panhead motorcycle.
>
> "Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact)
> experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you
> renew your faith in mankind – you help anyone you can, you never ask
> for anything, but you take what they offer."
>
> For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs
> and conversation all over North America.
>
> Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son
> and a daughter and become a house-husband – Mr. Mom, as he calls
> himself.
>
> He also describes himself in far more colourful terms—a motorcyclist
> rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed
> individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud
> Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."
>
> Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his life.
>
> "But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said.
> "It's alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"
>
> Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.
>
> "I didn't appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door
> interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can
> call me. I'm not going to drive my opinions down their throats."
>
> And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.
>
> "I won't take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It's
> not about money. It goes against what I'm fighting about."
>
> What he's fighting for is the discussion of issues – tainted blood,
> the exploitation of the Maritimes' gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
> name a few.
>
> "The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs – fishing,
> farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I'm
> death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
> (NAFTA) out the window.
>
> NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
> easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.
>
> Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.
>
> "There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
> especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
> Don't necessarily vote for me, but vote."
>
> Although…if you're going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have
> your X by his name.
>
> "I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and
> say, 'what the hell.'"
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:38:35 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack
> of ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before
> you people buy much stock in their stock eh?
> To: henrybanta <henrybanta@aol.com>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:47:02 -0300
> Subject: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack of
> ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before you
> people buy much stock in their stock eh?
> To: Scott.Espenshade@bhpbilliton.
>
> http://www.theglobeandmail.
>
> http://beta.images.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:47:02 -0300
> Subject: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack of
> ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before you
> people buy much stock in their stock eh?
> To: Scott.Espenshade@bhpbilliton.
>
> http://www.theglobeandmail.
>
> http://beta.images.
>
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "STAINTON-JAMES, Angela" <STAINTONJAMESA@parliament.uk>
>> > To: "'David Amos'" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 5:50 AM
>> > Subject: RE: So what is the Conservative MP Hugh Robertson gonna do
>> > about people in his riding torturing people on the Internet? In Canada
>> > such slander is a crime EH Vic Toews?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Dear David
>> >
>> > Thank you for your e-mail addressed to Hugh Robertson. Your e-mail
>> > has come through to Hugh's constituency office when, clearly, you need
>> > his Department. Sadly, I do not have an e-mail address for him but
>> > the telephone number of the Department of Media Culture and Sport is
>> > 020 7211 6200 and they should be able to provide you with the
>> > necessary information.
>> >
>> > Thank you for writing to Hugh and if you have any problem at all
>> > please do not hesitate to come back to me.
>> >
>> > Best wishes
>> > Angela Stainton-James
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
>> > Sent: 29 May 2010 23:24
>> > To: STAINTON-JAMES, Angela; toewsv1
>> > Cc: RHar100@aol.com; Gilles. Blinn; gilles.moreau; roger. gillies;
>> > rogerduguay21
>> > Subject: So what is the Conservative MP Hugh Robertson gonna do about
>> > people in his riding torturing people on the Internet? In Canada such
>> > slander is a crime EH Vic Toews?
>> >
>> > Need I say that "Satan's Crack Dealer" and his many evil little fans
>> > atacked the wrong pissed of Maritimer in Youtube? Scroll down read
>> > real slow and then call your lawyer or the cops Mr Roberson
>> >
>> > http://www.facebook.com/group.
>> > Richard Coughlan
>> > Faversham, United Kingdom
>> > email RHar100@aol.com
>> > Website:http://youtube.com/
>> > Phone 07935333407
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 15:46:20 -0300
>> > Subject: Mr. Finkelstein I just discovered you and your concerns today
>> > perhaps we should have a long talk ASAP? i an be reached at 506 485
>> > 2578 for a couple of days
>> > To: normfinkelstein@gmail.com
>> >
>> > Need I say that I am hounoured that this evil person hates me/
>> >
>> > http://baconfat53.blogspot.
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 14:23:46 -0300
>> > Subject: Lets see if the Russians will understand Fwd: We just talked
>> > this what I was trying to relate to the President of Mexico while he
>> > was in Canada
>> > To: info@rusembassy.ca
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 14:19:51 -0300
>> > Subject: We just talked this what I was trying to relate to the
>> > President of Mexico while he was in Canada
>> > To: atperez_lee <atperez_lee@yahoo.com.mx>
>> >
>> > The easiest way to check something about my concerns quickly is to go
>> > to the US Senate Banking Committee hearing on November 18th and 20th
>> > 2003 and notice the webcasts and transcripts of a very important
>> > hearing about the financial industry are missing. Please notice the
>> > crook Eliot Spitzer testified on the 20th
>> >
>> > http://banking.senate.gov/
>> >
>> >
>> > http://banking.senate.gov/
>> >
>> > http://banking.senate.gov/
>> >
>> > Now look for Spitzer's answer to me on page 13 of this pdf file
>> >
>> > http://www.scribd.com/doc/
>> >
>> > The easy answer to your next question is YES I am the the guy nobody
>> > will talk about. so perhaps you should for the benefit of your
>> > concerns and pocketbook. (Google David Amos and Wendy Olsen to see how
>> > far down the rabbbit hole I can take anyone)
>> >
>> > I explained some of it a year ago on many talk shows and nobody cared.
>> > Listen here if you wish then go figure whom you should trust.
>> >
>> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>> >
>> > If nothing else have laugh at my espense and Google this expression
>> > "Nobody will say my name"
>> >
>> >
>> > Here is just one of the many reasons why
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
>> > Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 9:21 AM
>> > To: David Amos; USANYS-MADOFF; Litt, Marc (USANYS)
>> > Cc: webo; vasilescua@sec.gov; friedmani@sec.gov; krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
>> > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> >
>> > Thank you for your response.
>> >
>> > Wendy Olsen
>> > Victim Witness Coordinator
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
>> > Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:48 AM
>> > To: USANYS-MADOFF; Olsen, Wendy (USANYS); Litt, Marc (USANYS)
>> > Cc: webo; vasilescua@sec.gov; friedmani@sec.gov; krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
>> > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> >
>> > Ms Olsen
>> >
>> > Thank you for keeping me informed.
>> >
>> > Yes unseal all my emails with all their attachments immediately and
>> > make certain that the US Attorny's office finally practices full
>> > disclosurement as to who I am and what my concerns are as per the Rule
>> > of Law within a purported democracy.
>> >
>> > As you folks all well know I am not a shy man and I have done nothing
>> > wrong. It appears to me that bureacratic people only use the right to
>> > privacy of others when it suits their malicious ends in order to
>> > protect their butts from impreacment, litigation and prosecution.
>> >
>> > The people in the US Attorney's Office and the SEC etc are very well
>> > aware that I protested immediately to everyone I could think of when
>> > the instant I knew that my correspondences went under seal and Madoff
>> > pled guilty so quickly and yet another cover up involing my actions
>> > was under full steam. Everybody knows that.the US Government has been
>> > trying to keep my concerns about the rampant public corruption a
>> > secret for well over seven long years. However now that a lot of
>> > poeple and their countries in general are losing a lot of money people
>> > are beginning to remember just exactly who I am and what i did
>> > beginning over seven years ago..
>> >
>> > Veritas Vincit
>> > David Raymond Amos
>> > 506 756 8687
>> >
>> > P.S. For the record Obviously I pounced on these Yankee bastards as
>> > soon as the newsrag in Boston published this article on the web last
>> > night.
>> >
>> > http://www.bostonherald.com/
>> > ormat=&page=2&listingType=biz#
>> >
>> > Notice that Nester just like everyone else would not say my name? It
>> > is because my issues surrounding both Madoff and are NOT marketing
>> > timing They are as you all well know money laundering, fraud,
>> > forgery, perjury, securites fraud, tax fraud, Bank fraud, illegal
>> > wiretappping and Murder amongst other very serious crimes.
>> >
>> > "SEC spokesman John Nester dismissed similarities between Markopolos
>> > and Scannell's cases as "not a valid comparison."
>> >
>> > He said the SEC determined the market-timing by Putnam clients that
>> > Scannell reported didn't violate federal law. Nester said the SEC only
>> > acted after another tipster alleged undisclosed market-timing by some
>> > Putnam insiders.
>> >
>> > Scannell, now a crusader for SEC reforms, isn't surprised the agency
>> > is in hot water again.
>> >
>> > Noting that several top SEC officials have gone on to high-paying
>> > private-sector jobs, he believes hopes for future employment impact
>> > investigations. "It's a distinct disadvantage to make waves before you
>> > enter the private sector," Scannell said."
>> >
>> > --- On Mon, 3/30/09, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S
>> > OFFICE
>> > SDNY
>> > To: NesterJ@sec.gov, letterstoeditor@bostonherald.
>> > < oig@sec.gov>, Thunter@tribune.com, david@davidmyles.com,
>> > ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca, "Dan Fitzgerald" <danf@danf.net>
>> > Cc: dsheehan@bakerlaw.com, dspelfogel@bakerlaw.com,
>> > mc@whistleblowers.org, gkachroo@mccarter.com,
>> > david.straube@accenture.com, gurdip.s.sahota@accenture.com,
>> > benjamin_mcmurray@ao.uscourts.
>> > Date: Monday, March 30, 2009, 10:00 PM
>> >
>> > Need I say BULLSHIT?
>> >
>> > http://www.bostonherald.com/
>> > ormat=&page=2&listingType=biz#
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:03:13 -0300
>> > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S
>> > OFFICE
>> > SDNY
>> > To: Russ.Stanton@latimes.com, meredith.goodman@latimes.com,
>> > ninkster@navigantconsulting.
>> > Cc: firstselectmanffld@town.
>> > editor@whatsupfairfield.com, info@csiworld.org, jacques_poitras
>> > < jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:40:55 -0300
>> > Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> > To: gmacnamara@town.fairfield.ct.
>> > "Paul. Harpelle" <Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca>, Jason Keenan
>> > < jason.keenan@icann.org>, Kandalaw <Kandalaw@mindspring.com>
>> > Cc: info@grahamdefense.org, fbinhct@leo.gov
>> >
>> > From: "Peck,Dave" <DPeck@town.fairfield.ct.us>
>> > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:32:32 -0400
>> > Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT
>> > INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > I will be unavailable until 4/1/09.
>> >
>> > Deputy Chief MacNamara will be in charge while I am away.
>> >
>> > He can be reached at 254-4831 or email him at
>> > gmacnamara@town.fairfield.ct.
>> >
>> > I will not be checking emails or cell phone messages.
>> >
>> > Thank you,
>> >
>> > Chief Dave Peck
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:32:18 -0300
>> > Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> > To: dpeck@town.fairfield.ct.us, edit@ctpost.com, bresee@courant.com
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:19:35 -0300
>> > Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
>> > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> > To: dtnews@telegraph.co.uk
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: USANYS-MADOFF
>> > Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 3:06 PM
>> > To: DAVID.RAYMOND.AMOS@GMAIL.COM
>> > Subject: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>> >
>> > In United States v. Bernard L. Madoff, 09 Cr. 213 (DC), the Court
>> > received a request from NBC and ABC to unseal all correspondence from
>> > victims that has been submitted in connection with the case.
>> >
>> > This includes your email to the Government.
>> >
>> > If the correspondence from victims is unsealed, the victim's personal
>> > identifying information including name, address, telephone number and
>> > email address (to the extent it was included on the correspondence)
>> > will become public. The Government must submit a response to the
>> > request by NBC and ABC by Tuesday, March 31, 2009. Please let us know
>> > whether you consent to the full disclosure of your correspondence, or
>> > whether you wish to have your correspondence remain sealed for privacy
>> > or other reasons.
>> > If you wish to have your correspondence remain sealed, please let us
>> > know the reason. We will defend your privacy to the extent that we
>> > can. Thank you.
>> >
>> > I looks like the US attorney in New York finally has to unseal my
>> > emails that you dudes have been sitting on for quite some time for no
>> > reason I will ever understand other than you are just a bunch of
>> > chickenshits.
>> >
>> > I know NBC, ABC, your blogger buddies or any other media wacko will
>> > never say my name but the pissed off folks that lost a lot of money
>> > with Bernie Baby just may ask how the hell I am EH?
>> >
>> > Veritas Vincit
>> > David Raymond Amos
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:48:50 -0300
>> > Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
>> > KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>> > To: Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:29:42 -0300
>> > Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
>> > KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>> > To: PChavkin@mintz.com
>> > Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: "Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)" <Wendy.Olsen@usdoj.gov>
>> > Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:08:04 -0400
>> > Subject: RE: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
>> > KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>> > To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> >
>> > On March 10, 2009, the Honorable Denny Chin provided the following
>> > guidance for victims who wish to be heard at the plea proceeding on
>> > March 12, 2009 at 10:00 a.m.:
>> >
>> > Judge Chin stated that there are two issues that the Court will
>> > consider at the hearing: (1) whether to accept a guilty plea from the
>> > defendant to the eleven-count Criminal Information filed by the
>> > Government, which provides for a maximum sentence of 150 years'
>> > imprisonment; and (2) whether the defendant should be remanded or
>> > released on conditions of bail, if the Court accepts a guilty plea.
>> > Judge Chin also stated that, at the hearing on March 12, 2009, he will
>> > conduct a plea allocution of the defendant and then will announce
>> > whether the Court intends to accept the plea. At that time, the Court
>> > will solicit speakers who disagree with the Court's intended ruling.
>> >
>> > Assuming the defendant pleads guilty and his plea is accepted by
>> > the Court, the Court intends to allow the Government and defense
>> > counsel to speak on the issue of bail. The Court will then announce
>> > its intended ruling on that issue. The Court will then invite
>> > individuals who disagree with the proposed ruling on bail to be heard.
>> >
>> > The Court noted that there will be opportunity for victims to be
>> > heard in the future on the subjects of sentencing, forfeiture and
>> > restitution in advance of any sentencing of the defendant. The Court
>> > also noted that it is not appropriate for victims who wish to speak
>> > concerning sentencing issues to be heard at the March 12, 2009
>> > proceeding.
>> >
>> > A link to the a transcript of the March 10, 2009 Court hearing can
>> > be found on the website of the United States Attorney's Office for the
>> > Southern District of New York:
>> >
>> > http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/nys
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
>> > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 10:56 AM
>> > To: usanys.madoff@usdoj.gov
>> > Subject: FW: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
>> > KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
>> > Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 12:58 PM
>> > To: horwitzd@dicksteinshapiro.com; Nardoza, Robert (USANYE);
>> > USAMA-Media (USAMA); Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
>> > Cc: oig
>> > Subject: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and KPMG
>> > etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>> >
>> > horwitzd@dicksteinshapiro.com
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: "Sartory, Thomas J." <TSartory@goulstonstorrs.com>
>> > Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 07:41:20 -0500
>> > Subject: RE: I did talk the lawyers Golub and Flumenbaum tried to
>> > discuss Bernie Madoff and KPMG etc before sending these emails
>> > To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> >
>> >
>> > Dear Mr. Amos,
>> >
>> > I am General Counsel at Goulston & Storrs. Your email below to
>> > Messers. Rosensweig and Reisch has been forwarded to me for response.
>> > While it's not clear what type of assistance, if any, you seek from
>> > Goulston % Storrs, please be advised that we are not in a position to
>> > help you. Please do not send further communications to any of our
>> > attorneys. We will not be able to respond, and your communications
>> > will not be protected by the attorney-client privilege.
>> >
>> > We wish you well in the pursuit of your concerns.
>> >
>> > Sincerely,
>> >
>> > Thomas J. Sartory
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: David Amos [mailto:
>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 8:18 PM
>> > To: Rosensweig, Richard J.; info@LAtaxlawyers.com; Reisch, Alan M.;
>> > reed@hbsslaw.com
>> > Subject: Fwd: I did talk the lawyers Golub and Flumenbaum tried to
>> > discuss Bernie Madoff and KPMG etc before sending these emails
>> >
>> > Perhaps somebody should call me back now. EH?
>> >
>> > UK Parliament Disclaimer:
>> > This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have
>> > received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your
>> > system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted.
>> > This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted
>> > for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "R Hide (MIN)" <R.Hide@ministers.govt.nz>
>> > To: "David Amos" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> > Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 6:33 PM
>> > Subject: RE: BENJAMIN'S EASTON'S PROTEST NOTICE ABOUT INJUSTICES I
>> > have an idea for you Ben
>> >
>> >
>> > On behalf of the Hon Rodney Hide, Minister of Local Government, I wish
>> > to acknowledge receipt of your email.
>> >
>> > Your correspondence has been placed in front of the Minister.
>> >
>> > regards
>> >
>> > Sandy Grove
>> > Ministerial Private Secretary (Advisory)
>> > Office of Hon Rodney Hide
>> > WELLINGTON
>> > Ph 04 817 6630
>> > Email: sandy.grove@parliament.govt.nz
>> >
>> > The content of this email, including any attachment, is intended for
>> > the named recipient only and is not necessarily the official view or
>> > communication of the Department of Internal Affairs It may contain
>> > privileged material and/or confidential information.
>> >
>> > If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must not
>> > copy it, distribute it or take any action in reliance on it. If you
>> > have received this email in error, please notify the sender
>> > immediately and delete this email. Although this email has been
>> > scanned for viruses, this email is not guaranteed to be free of
>> > viruses and should be checked by your own security mechanisms. No
>> > liability is accepted for any loss or damage arising from the use of
>> > this email or its attachments.
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
>> > Sent: Tuesday, 29 September 2009 3:05 pm
>> > To: T Ryall (MIN); Amy Adams; Jim Anderton;
>> > anderton.wigram@xtra.co.nz; Jacinda Ardern; Shane Ardern; Chris
>> > Auchinvole; Kanwaljit Singh Bakshi; Rick Barker; Carol Beaumont; David
>> > Bennett; Loren Bolton (MIN); Jackie Blue; Chester Borrows;
>> > chester.wanganui@xtra.co.nz; chester.hawera@xtra.co.nz; John Boscawen;
>> > Sue Bradford; socialjustice@greens.org.nz; Simon Bridges; Natalie
>> > Roberts (MIN); Brendon Burns; bb@brendonburns.co.nz; Chris Carter;
>> > labourwest@xtra.co.nz; D Carter (MIN); cartermp@xtra.co.nz; J Carter
>> > (MIN); northlandelectorate@xtra.co.nz
>> > Chauvel; Ashraf Choudhary; J Coleman (MIN); J Collins (MIN);
>> > office@judithcollins.co.nz; Clayton Cosgrove;
>> > claytoncosgrovekaiapoi@xtra.
>> > dcunliffe@xtra.co.nz; Clare Curran; lianne.dalziel@parliament.
>> > Kelvin Davis; Jacqui Dean; Catherine Delahunty; Roger Douglas; P Dunne
>> > (MIN); electjville@xtra.co.nz; Ruth Dyson; ruth.dyson@xtra.co.nz; B
>> > English (MIN); elecgor@esi.co.nz; Darien Fenton;
>> > office@labournorth.org.nz; C Finlayson (MIN); Jeanette Fitzsimons; Te
>> > Ururoa Flavell; Craig Foss; craigfoss@backingthebay.co.nz; David
>> > Garrett; Aaron Gilmore; p.goff@parliament.govt.nz; phil@goff.org.nz;
>> > Jo Goodhew; sandra.goudie@national.org.nz; Kennedy Graham; Hon. Tim
>> > Groser (MIN); nathan.guy@national.org.nz;
>> > national.horowhenua@xtra.co.nz
>> > Hague; Hone Harawira; Terry Ututaonga; George Hawkins; John Hayes; P
>> > Heatley (MIN); Tau Henare; tau.henaremp@xtra.co.nz; R Hide (MIN);
>> > rodney@epsom.org.nz; Paul Hutchison; hunua.electorate@xtra.co.nz;
>> > Shane Jones; shanejonesmp@xtra.co.nz; S Joyce (MIN); Rahui Katene;
>> > Nikki Kaye; Sue Kedgley; J Key (MIN); genelle@johnkey.mp.net.nz;
>> > A.King@parliament.govt.nz; kilbirnieeo@xtra.co.nz;
>> > colin.kingmp@xtra.co.nz; winnie.laban@parliament.govt.
>> > mana.electorate@xtra.co.nz; Melissa Lee;
>> > Iain.leesgalloway@parliament.
>> > greenmps.auckland@greens.org.
>> > peseta.sam.lotuiiga@
>> > moana.mackey@labour.org.nz; Nanaia Mahuta;
>> > tainuielectorate@xtra.co.nz; Trevor Mallard; WOAoffice@xtra.co.nz;
>> > petone.eo@clear.net.nz; W Mapp (MIN); Todd McClay; M McCully (MIN);
>> > murray.mccully@xtra.co.nz; Sue Moroney; waikatohub.mps@xtra.co.nz;
>> > Stuart Nash; Russel Norman; Hekia Parata; David Parker; Allan Peachey;
>> > Ritchie Wards; lynne.pillaymp@xtra.co.nz; S Power (MIN);
>> > simonpower.feilding@xtra.co.nz
>> > Prasad; Paul Quinn; angela.bray@parliament.govt.nz
>> > jen.toogood@parliament.govt.nz
>> > marlene.ditchfield@xtra.co.nz; janette.granville@xtra.co.nz; Pete
>> > Hodgson; pete@petehodgson.co.nz; Parekura Horomia;
>> > ikaroa.gis@xtra.co.nz; ikaroa.hstgs@xtra.co.nz; Darren Hughes; Raymond
>> > Huo; office@grantrobertson.co.nz; Ross Robertson;
>> > rae.waterhouse@xtra.co.nz; michael.clatworthy@xtra.co.nz; Eric Roy; H
>> > Roy (MIN); Heather Henderson; Pita Sharples (MIN); Sua William Sio;
>> > Trish Wanden; mp.rodney.warkworth@xtra.co.nz
>> > nick@nick4nelson.co.nz; Maryan Street; Lindsay Tisch;
>> > tolleywhk@xtra.co.nz; tolleygis@xtra.co.nz;
>> > chris.tremain@national.org.nz; napier.electorate@airnet.net.
>> > Metiria Turei; greenmps.dunedin@greens.org.nz
>> > Tari.Turia@xtra.co.nz; Philip Twyford; Louise Upston; Nicky Wagner; K
>> > Wilkinson (MIN); waimakariri@xtra.co.nz; M Williamson (MIN); Michael
>> > Woodhouse; blueandgold@parliament.govt.nz
>> > pansy.wong@xtra.co.nz; ahan.young@parliament.govt.nz;
>> > rosslynn@hrc.co.nz; sylviab@hrc.co.nz; michaelW@hrc.co.nz;
>> > phillippa.smith@oag.govt.nz; Mark.Holman@ssc.govt.nz;
>> > mark.thornton@justice.govt.nz; boris.vanbeusekom@justice.
>> > tinz@paradise.net.nz; >; emma.miles@police.govt.nz;
>> > John.Rivers@police.govt.nz; Mike.Webb@police.govt.nz;
>> > nurses@nzno.org.nz; gay@pha.org.nz; qsolutionsrising@gmail.com;
>> > easy@island.net; jardim.stratton@gmail.com;
>> > christinejhansen@gmail.com; no_to_nwo@yahoo.co.uk;
>> > johan.niklasson@evolution-
>> > saxon1hero@yahoo.co.uk; journalist@bellsouth.net;
>> > irenew.politico@gmail.com; daniel.solis@seznam.cz;
>> > vickytoxotis@hotmail.com; wef339@mail.com; katcre22@yahoo.com;
>> > scott@tkgtech.com; amandablake@blueyonder.co.uk;
>> > who.flu.2009@gmail.com; jazon@ymail.com; sineadcasper@live.ie;
>> > acpscotland@hotmail.co.uk; p.duffy93@ntlworld.com;
>> > tua46054@temple.edu; ciaranmcloone@ooglemail.com;
>> > marek_p2000@yahoo.com; black2000at@hotmail.com;
>> > madame_karnak@yahoo.com; sracine@gmail.com;
>> > annikatornlind@hotmail.com; manonf6@yahoo.com; matt@mattengelman.com;
>> > grantlear@hotmail.com; helix7@hotmail.com; editor@uncensored.co.nz;
>> > melocacau@gmail.com; steve.gosschalk@gmail.com;
>> > tidalelectric@gmail.com; vapi.kupenga@xtra.co.nz;
>> > eastwood.vincent@gmail.com; sichel@nsw.chariot.net.au;
>> > mlm@archaeoskymatrix.com
>> > Cc: laos_newzealand@yahoo.co.nz; jane burgermeister
>> > Subject: RE: BENJAMIN'S EASTON'S PROTEST NOTICE ABOUT INJUSTICES I
>> > have an idea for you Ben
>> >
>> > From: National Kapiti Electorate Office <national.kapiti@xtra.co.nz>
>> > Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:14:19 +1300
>> > Subject: RE: NZ HEALTH MINISTER TONY RYALL - MS PENNY DO YOU READ
>> > EMAILS AS WELL AS WRITE THEM?
>> > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > Dear Mr Amos
>> > Thank you for copying Nathan in with your email to NZ Health Minister
>> > Tony
>> > Ryall. This has been passed on to Nathan for his information.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Heather
>> >
>> > Heather Shaw| Electorate Agent for Hon Nathan Guy MP for Otaki
>> > P: +64 4 298 2906| F: +64 4 298 4845| Shop 3, 23 Amohia Street,
>> > Paraparaumu,
>> > Kapiti Coast 5032
>> > www.nathanguy.co.nz
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Heather
>> >
>> > Jan 3rd, 2004
>> >
>> > Mr. David R. Amos
>> > 153 Alvin Avenue
>> > Milton, MA U.S.A. 02186
>> >
>> > Dear Mr. Amos
>> >
>> > Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to
>> > my predecessor,
>> > the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding your safety. I apologize for the
>> > delay in responding.
>> >
>> > If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
>> > suggest that you contact
>> > the police of local jurisdiction. In addition, any evidence of
>> > criminal activity should be brought
>> > to their attention since the police are in the best position to
>> > evaluate the information and take
>> > action as deemed appropriate.
>> >
>> > I trust that this information is satisfactory.
>> >
>> > Yours sincerely
>> > A. Anne McLellan”
>> >
>> > September 11th, 2004
>> >
>> > Dear Mr. Amos,
>> >
>> > On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne
>> > Clarkson, I acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and
>> > CD regarding corruption, one received from you directly, and the
>> > other forwarded to us by the Office of the Lieutenant Governor of
>> > New Brunswick.
>> >
>> > I regret to inform you that the Governor General cannot
>> > intervene in matters that are the responsibility of elected officials
>> > and courts of
>> > Justice of Canada. You already contacted the various provincial
>> > authorities
>> > regarding your concerns, and these were the appropriate steps to take.
>> >
>> > Yours sincerely.
>> >
>> > Renee Blanchet
>> > Office of the Secretary to the Governor General
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:12:44 -0300
>> Subject: Fwd: We just talked
>> To: scott.white@thecanadianpress.
>> editor@policeprofessional.com
>> Cc: IgnatM <IgnatM@parl.gc.ca>, LaytoJ <LaytoJ@parl.gc.ca>,
>> jemma@policeprofessional.com, hiddenfromhistory
>> < hiddenfromhistory@yahoo.ca>
>>
>> Need i say i was not surprised when Askari and his boss Kevin Page
>> formerly of the PCO office did not respond to my phone calls or email
>> yesterday?
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:39:54 -0300
>> Subject: We just talked
>> To: askarm@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Mostafa Askari
>> Director General
>> Library of Parliament
>> Economic and Fiscal Analysis
>> Parliament Buildings
>> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A9
>> Canada
>>
>> Telephone : 613-992-8045
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 18:07:59 -0300
>> Subject: You Cato dudes played dumb again about your missing blog and
>> the documents I sent ya but lets see if one of your Directors is a
>> dumb as you and the Feds pretend to be
>> To: barnold@cato.org, kcouchman@cato.org, ckennedy@cato.org,
>> amast@cato.org
>> Cc: "rick. skinner" <rick.skinner@dhs.gov>, "Dean.Buzza"
>> < Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>
>> The text of the blog of Tom Palmer's that Cato denies existed can be
>> found within my blog and many other places as well as this email
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
>>
>> March 24, 2005
>> Crazy as a Loon, but Free
>>
>> Off to Iceland!
>>
>> Well, Bobby Fischer has his Icelandic passport. The U.S. government
>> can now stop persecuting him for the crime of playing chess in
>> Yugoslavia. Fischer may be out of his mind (tha’ts almost certain, if
>> you consider his anti-Semitism and praise for the 9-11 attacks), but
>> he’s not out of his mind for choosing Iceland as his country of
>> refuge. And the Icelanders, who may later regret having such an
>> utterly crazy person wandering around in their country, have done the
>> right thing by offering him refuge.
>>
>> NOTE: I seem to have attracted a stalker, who keeps posting strange
>> messages on this site. Whatever.
>>
>> Posted by Tom Palmer at March 24, 2005 07:09 AM | TrackBack
>>
>> Comments
>> Quite frankly I do not understand this. What does Iceland gain from
>> this? Fischer himself stated that he would NEVER return to chess. So,
>> it is unlikely that he will play for Iceland... and even though he
>> did, it is not like he’d be back at the top.
>> Now, he might want to teach his fellow Icelanders
>> Fischerrandom...Fischerrandom is to chess what Estonian grammar is to
>> linguistic ...And THAT sounds like a threat to me. NV
>>
>>
>> Posted by: Nathalie I. Vogel at March 24, 2005 08:36 AM
>> I doubt that Iceland has much to gain. (And I suspect that the
>> inhabitants of Reykjavik may suffer from having an insufferable
>> loudmouth crackpot wandering around.) But they did the right thing.
>> The better thing would have been for the U.S. to drop its case against
>> Mr. Fischer. I don't think you should lose your passport or suffer
>> criminal prosecution for traveling someplace to play chess. I think
>> that the position of the U.S. government (and of both Democratic and
>> Republican administrations) is the harder one to understand.
>>
>> Posted by: Tom G. Palmer at March 24, 2005 08:47 AM
>> TGP: "Fischer may be out of his mind (tha’ts almost certain, if you
>> consider his anti-Semitism "
>>
>> I don't want to go all Szaszian on someone for what is most likely a
>> casual comment, but suggesting someone is "out of his mind" simply
>> because he is (labeled as) anti-Semitic seems overmuch. Immoral,
>> perhaps...poorly informed, possibly...holding to views developed as a
>> result of childhood associations, maybe...a confusion on either the
>> part of Fischer or the person making the accusation of anti-Semitism
>> with anti-Zionism, quite possible. But "out of his mind"?
>>
>> Posted by: Ross Levatter at March 24, 2005 11:17 AM
>> Ross, Tom did refer to 'his' anti-Semitism; maybe it's not just that
>> Fischer does not like Jews, but that he suffers from a particularly
>> radical form of bigotry.
>>
>> I wouldn't know myself, but that was the inference I drew from Tom's
>> comment.
>>
>> Posted by: Henri Hein at March 25, 2005 02:45 AM
>> Then, Henri, he would be immoral, or bigoted, not "out of his mind".
>> And he should consult an ethicist, not a travel agent or chiropracter
>> to bring him back to his mind or better align it.
>> Again, my point was merely that "out of his mind" implies one must be
>> crazy or mentally ill to be anti-Semitic; I think that's a category
>> error.
>>
>> Ross
>>
>> Posted by: Ross Levatter at March 25, 2005 06:54 PM
>> Ross's points are well taken, but I do think that some term such as
>> "crazy" (I'll stay away from "mentally ill") is useful in describing
>> Mr. Fischer. (And even Thomas Szasz readily admits that there are
>> "lots of crazy people" around; he just says that they're not sick.)
>>
>> The anti-Semitism that Mr. Fischer spouts is not of the "they wouldn't
>> be welcome in our club" sort (bad as that is), but of the "Organized
>> International Jewry is out to get me," sort. The former is an example
>> of bad behavior, bad manners, immoral views, or the like. The latter
>> sort of anti-Semitism is an obsession that seems in general to be
>> immune to either moral appeal (since it's a claim about an alleged
>> state of affairs, viz., that the Jews run everything and are out to
>> get one) or to factual refutation (how do you argue someone out of
>> such a...for want of a better word...crazy view?).
>>
>> Posted by: Tom G. Palmer at March 25, 2005 11:34 PM
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: rjvattuone@aol.com
>> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 9:59 AM
>> Subject: This is going to get interesting
>>
>>
>> Hey Richard
>>
>> Thanks for calling me back the other day. Here is my number in Boston
>> 617 698-6549 begin_of_the_skype_
>> end_of_the_skype_highlighting. I will be hitting the road shortly
>> and I will be sending out to you hard copy of what I am sending to
>> Scott Daruty. However there is a great deal more you should know ASAP.
>> I am involved against the biggest and baddest of them all and we all
>> know they play for keeps. It is important that you know much and have
>> evidence of it in order to protect yourself. I know they moniter my
>> phone calls and I have know doubt that they listen to the Canadain
>> Cell as well. The fact that you spoke to me honestly and openly puts
>> you in jeopardy. If you had acted like most lawyers, the bastards
>> would leave you alone. If you come to my aid, they will attack you.
>> Trust me it has happened before and I will send proof of it in the
>> following emails. Some contain the Tiffs I mentioned I am curious to
>> see if they get through AOL system. I hack been blocked by them in the
>> past. I have not heard from Barry Bachrach since just after he warned
>> me that the FBI was about to pounce on me on Oct 1st. It seems they
>> have him running scared. I must do my best to protect honest men..
>>
>> The following is what I just posted but it seems Bill Gates does not
>> allow Tiff files in his sites so I will forward it to you to support
>> what I said is true. Answer this email if and when you get it an I
>> will send some others if you wish. However I think it would be better
>> not to use AOL. As I said just get one in Yahoo or Hotmail they work
>> better and are free.
>>
>> From: motomaniac in response to Message 1 Sent: 3/27/2005 9:21 AM
>>
>> In defense of Bobby Fischer I must say that he is just another man
>> like me. He has his strengths and his weaknesses. Just like me. One
>> particular forte of his, the amazing ability to play a game very well
>> thrust him into the limelight for the whole wide world to study and
>> examine his every move. More importantly I believe his fame caused him
>> to become a pawn in the big big game. Although he had his right to
>> privacy, the whole world dogged at his heels and critized his every
>> action as a man. The Masters of War obviously tried use him to their
>> advantage during the Cold War. He is not a stateman or a lawyer. He is
>> simply a free thinking individual who has every right to speak his
>> mind particularly after he has suffered through hell just because he
>> plays chess so very well.
>>
>> I say judge not lest ye be judged and mind your own mouth about things
>> you do not know all the details of. I am far more outspoken than Bobby
>> ever was and yet you have never even heard of my name. It is because
>> the corporate controlled media is not permited to do so. I am nobody
>> with any special talent that had caused me to be thrown into public
>> scrutiny before I was compelled to speak out as Bobby has done. I do
>> not have to agree or disagree with his every word over the years to
>> understand his meaning and his troubles. That said, in all honesty it
>> would behoove us both if his lawyer would listen to me and employ
>> Bobby's fame to expose the truth of all that we say.
>>
>> I am am not a perfect person and neither is Bobby. I do not know him
>> nor do I judge him. Yet I do agree with with his standing in defense
>> of his freedom. The Chessmaster has every right to spout off against
>> the Masters of War because they have offended him greatly. It is for
>> his attorney to weed out the truth and evidence of his convictions and
>> present it in court in order to seek relief on his client's behalf. A
>> jury of his peers will decide the truth of his matters not us bloggers
>> without veiwing and hearing all the evidence. Forget what you may
>> glean from the media. The information is controlled and slanted
>> against him. Listen to what his lawyer says and what is used in
>> arguement against him on the public record. Do not hold court in the
>> media just gossip about things you know are true in order for the
>> courts to act properly in the public interest.
>>
>> Bobby has paid the devil his due and done time in his jails. It is
>> time for him to seek relief. I have as well. I was summoned to jail in
>> the USA while running for Parliament in Canada and held under the
>> charges of "other". I will not want allow myself to be judged on just
>> one particular act or deed. My criminal trial in the USA is coming
>> very soon. I will have lots to say.
>>
>> It is the average of all our days and deeds that speaks of us as the
>> men we are. Like any game, it is what happens in the end that counts.
>> Sometimes sacrifices must be made and sometimes mistakes are made.
>> However once the word "checkmate" is declared, it is all over but the
>> crying as long as we play by the rules and the fat lady sings in tune.
>> I am more than happy to provide to Mr. Vattuone my evidence of much
>> public corruption in order to support Bobby's lawsuit against the USA.
>> It is high time the the Masters of War paid the fiddler and then be
>> compelled to dance to a different tune as we make them fall on their
>> own sword. No one is above the law. The public trust must be upheld or
>> we are all losers in the the big big game. Forget Bobby and chess for
>> a minute and listen to what he is saying through his attorney. I
>> applaud is efforts in support of Bobby and his legal matters. I hope
>> we get on like a house on fire. Any enemy of my foe should be a friend
>> of mine. Bobby lawyer is your neighbor listen to him and then speak
>> out to protect your own civil rights. What happened to Bobby and I
>> could happen to you next. Get it?
>>
>> If anyone wishes to challenge what I have said, respond to this
>> message with a email account that can hold of 25 megs of attachments.
>> I will send you Tiff files of legal documents etc. that will take you
>> down path of of the Garden of Good and Evil that everybody knows is
>> true. I simply made it a point to prove it. My particular forte that
>> helped accomplish such a necessary task is that I am more stubburn
>> than a pig, meaner than a snake and smarter than the average bear.
>> Much to my chagrin, I am just an average sort of chess player and have
>> much to learn from Bobby in that regard but I maintain that chess is
>> just a game. Bobby was compelled to play a far more serious and deadly
>> game just because of his love of a game. I do recognize his talent but
>> my hat is off to him because of what he did and stood for as a man not
>> a chess player. In regards to his legal actions methinks I can teach
>> his attorney a trick or two of mine.
>>
>> If anyone has any questions here is my phone number. 506 434-1379
>> begin_of_the_skype_
>> end_of_the_skype_highlighting Feel free to argue me and stress test my
>> ethics to the max. It is your freedom as well as my own that I am
>> protecting. I think anyone has the right to question my motives. I
>> speak plainly and do not hide my identity. Integrity does not need a
>> mask to hide behind. However men like John Ashcroft and all his
>> cohorts need jails to cage honest men who speak their mind about their
>> masks of virtue.
>>
>> Bobby is just one man of many. His is fortunate that he is famous.
>> Iceland would not do such things on behalf of the likes of me and many
>> others. However Canada or Japan or whatever would do the same against
>> me to support President Bush in a New York minute. In fact it already
>> happened. The one file I have attached is the reason Clark Kent Ervin
>> got fired immediately after the recent election. He long along proved
>> to me that he was not interested in Truth Justice and the American Way
>> and in fact he is a dumb as a post. I will wager I could beat him at
>> chess. I know I played him like a fiddle as a lawyer and that is his
>> game of choice. It was really to funny to me the advice he offered to
>> others as he entered into the Aspen Crowd of nasty dudes. I feel the
>> need to quote him. Many a govenment lawyer will understand why I am
>> busting my gut laughing. I hope Bobby's lawyer does too.
>>
>> Lauren Robinson POGO Fellow " Any advice for your fellow public
>> servants?"
>>
>> Clark Kent Ervin "Well, just do your job and let the political chips
>> fall where they may. Unless your're willing to do that, it seems to me
>> you shouldn't take the job in the first place."
>>
>> My answer to his remark is No Shit Sherlock. The former Inspector
>> General can expect a rather profound civil lawsuit. He must argue me
>> Pro Se or a at least without government assistance on his behalf
>> because he failed to act within the scope of his employment and he is
>> now out of the job.
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>>
>> Posted by: David R. Amos at March 27, 2005 06:12 PM
>> December 7th, 2003
>>
>> Gene Healy Senior Editor Cato Institute
>> 1000 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
>> Washington D.C. 20001-5403
>> Phone (202) 842-0200 begin_of_the_skype_
>> (202) 842-0200 end_of_the_skype_highlighting
>> Fax (202) 842-3490
>> RE: Corruption
>> Sir,
>> Please find enclosed an exact copy of a letter with all its enclosures
>> recently sent to the Hearst Corporation and many others. Many of your
>> directors such as Lewis E. Randall, John C. Malone and Jeffrey S. Yass
>> should find the documents an interesting read. I ask that you make
>> them available for their review.
>> I watched David Boaz speak on C-Span the other day and heard him say
>> many things. What I found the most interesting was that he said that
>> the Cato Institute was named after some rather prolific letter
>> writers. I invite you all to read mine. They can be found at the
>> website mentioned in the enclosed documents. I could not send this
>> letter to Mr. Boaz because he is not a lawyer and an officer of the
>> court as you are. This is because only law enforcement authorities or
>> officers of the court have any right to listen to the copy of wiretap
>> numbered 139. It is served upon you in confidence as an officer of the
>> court in order that you may act ethically and see that it is properly
>> investigated. Please share the contents of the Cd with only the proper
>> authorities so that I may never be accused of violating anyone’s
>> Fourth Amendment Rights.
>> As I have said to many other lawyers, at the very least I have now
>> made you a witness to my pursuit of justice. I ask you simply the
>> following. What will you do with your newfound knowledge of Civil
>> Rights Violations and Government Corruption?
>> Best Regards
>> David R.Amos
>> 153 Alvin Ave.
>> Milton MA. 02186
>>
>> Posted by: David R. Amos at March 27, 2005 06:22 PM
>> Um, as I was saying about some people being, um, a bit....well,
>> "different."
>>
>> Posted by: Tom G. Palmer at March 27, 2005 09:12 PM
>> Did I mention that I found snotty Oxford dudes had stuffed shirts and
>> were great fun to poke fun at as they bullshit others about how smart
>> they are?
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: marnie.ferguson@keyporter.com
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 5:08 PM
>> Subject: Fw: I just called I am not kidding
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: deborahlbmc@yahoo.com ; egeetter@bu.edu ;
>> dfpletters@dailyfreepress.com ; lawrence_summers@harvard.edu ;
>> wrogersjr@therogerslawfirm.com ; thomas.hannigan@ropesgray.com ;
>> jotodd@toddweld.com
>> Cc: warren.tolman@hklaw.com ; dan@dankennedy.net ; w.kirtz@neu.edu ;
>> howiecarr@wrko.com ; bzelnick@bu.edu ; n.daniloff@neu.edu ;
>> barnicle@969fmtalk.com ; wsj.ltrs@wsj.com ; amy.wolfcale@dowjones.com
>> ; joseph.stern@dowjones.com ; letters@washpost.com ; fair@fair.org ;
>> editor@usatoday.com ; pressreleases@upi.com ; letters@time.com ;
>> newshour@pbs.org ; ombudsman@npr.org ; morning@npr.org ;
>> letters@newsweek.com ; nytnews@nytimes.com ;
>> dfpletters@dailyfreepress.com ; gillooly@dailyfreepress.com ;
>> dfpnews@dailyfreepress.com ; 48hours@cbsnews.com ; pr@ap.org ;
>> nightline@abcnews.com
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 4:21 PM
>> Subject: Fw: I just called I am not kidding
>>
>>
>> Hey
>>
>> It appears that all the Law Schools know nothing of ethical behavior
>> if it may affect their coffers. I made it my task to prove it. Lets
>> see if I can turn the worm and make the light dawn on Marblehead for
>> the benefit of all.
>>
>> Whereas Todd Klipp is on Legal Advisory Committee United Educators
>> (UE) Insurance Risk Retention Group I called Corporate Counsel, Jan
>> Holt and told her something is up and that I would be serving the Hard
>> Copy of the evidence that proves what I say is true upon Mr. Klipp. If
>> I were you I would go to the US District Court in Beantown, query the
>> dockets that bear my name and ask the BU professor Chief Justice Young
>> about his integrity and his association with crooks like Charles J.
>> Kickham Jr. and all of his cohorts.
>>
>> Cardinal Law would be a good witness to ask to start a proper
>> investigation that is if you can get whoever becomes the next US
>> Ambassador to the Vatican to make him fess up about his sins.
>> Otherwise ask his former secretary Robert Kickham he is now O'Malley's
>> secretary. I have no doubt that little bastard knows everything but
>> trust that the three legal stooges Todd, Rogers and Hannigan have told
>> him to shut up and wait for me to quit or die. However I think the
>> Kickhams will soon fold their hand and start rattin out others very
>> soon. Their is no honour amongst theives and I have the Kickhams
>> cornered after three years of hard work. Their big daddy Chucky is
>> dead and the rest of them are as dumb as a post. Uncle Franky has been
>> dead since last June and I have finally forced the court to admit it.
>> None of their accountings have been assented to by anyone and the IRS
>> must check their work before my wife will settle. the Feds have a big
>> problem and everybody knows its me.
>>
>> I am proud to say I won't quit and don't care if I die. I made certain
>> that my truths live on and that no Kickham relatives can no longer
>> claim to be kin to my little Clan. I refuse to allow my family to
>> associate with bible pounding criminals that expound of law nor will I
>> settle with them in order that they may escape justice. They must be
>> held accountable and so should all their friends.
>>
>> I may seem crazy but at least I know my rights and will not allow
>> wrongs against my family to go unpunished, particularly when the
>> wrongs are practiced by people well paid or licensed by the state to
>> insure that matters such as this never happen. If I am not crazy then
>> the governments of Canada and the USA must be insanely corrupt. I know
>> for a fact that there are a lot of ordinary people that agree with me
>> therefore I know I am OK but I have my doubts about you. i am giving
>> Mr. Klipp just enough evidence to impeach George Bush and for safe
>> measure I am giving the same material to many others as well. Here's
>> hoping ethics wins out after all. Otherwise we are all losers and the
>> crooks within such organizations as the Aspen Institute will keep on
>> advising the bastards on how to screw us all.
>>
>> The judges of the First Circuit of the US District Court have a lot to
>> be accountable for and Judge Young is well aware of it all. He has no
>> right to teach others about trial practice and the law until he proves
>> that he understands how to uphold the law. I will be suing the bastard
>> in short order you pick whether you wish to stand with him or me.
>> There is no middle ground in this legal battle for Boston University
>> to stand on. Judge Young is in your employ. However methinks he is no
>> longer a feather in your cap. The University has bragged to have such
>> a man to teach the students. What say you now?
>>
>> Trust that I don't care if anyone reads this email or not. In fact it
>> will be more fun if ya didn't.
>>
>> "The Honorable William G. Young was appointed judge of the U.S.
>> District Court for Massachusetts in 1984, after serving as associate
>> justice of the state’s Superior Court. Prior positions include special
>> assistant attorney general, chief counsel to the governor, and clerk
>> for the Honorable Raymond Wilkins, former chief justice of the
>> Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. Judge Young has a long list of
>> pro bono activities, teaching experience, and several awards,
>> including the Award for Judicial Excellence from the Massachusetts
>> Academy of Trial Attorneys. Judge Young developed the course Advanced
>> Trial Practice and also teaches Evidence."
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: jb95@bu.edu
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 1:02 PM
>> Subject: Fw: I just called I am not kidding
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: MauraH@ci.boston.ma.us ; maurah@maurahennigan.com
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 12:36 PM
>> Subject: I just called I am not kidding
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: info@pogo.org ; elliot.gerson@aspeninstitute.
>> pat.zindulka@aspeninstitute.
>> clark.ervin@aspeninstitute.org
>> Cc: brian@questionsquestions.net ; plough@ploughshares.ca ; moto
>> maniac ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca ; kbar@nbnet.nb.ca ; backtalk@motherjones.com
>> ; Wes Penre@Illuminati News.com ; tpalmer@cato.org ; ghealy@cato.org ;
>> david@davidakin.com ; McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ; david@lutz.nb.ca ;
>> cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.
>> INFO7@elections.ca ; inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca ; cotlei@parl.gc.ca ;
>> Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ;
>> Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ; Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.
>> Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 9:30 AM
>> Subject: I just left voicemail for Jim Spiegelman
>>
>>
>> Hey Fellas
>> I have picked you Mr. Gerson to send exactly the same material that I
>> sent to two Solicitor Generals last year before I ran for Parliament
>> in Canada. I am certain that material caused Theodore Olson to quit
>> his job and your brand new fellow, Clark Kent Erwin to get the boot
>> from his job right after the last Yankee election.
>> Obviously I picked you because of your own bragging. There is no need
>> for me to expand upon things that you and I know to be true. It is
>> merely my task to prove to the world that you are well aware of my
>> concerns and allegations. Then if you and your Association does
>> nothing to uphold the public trust, I will make it my best effort to
>> embarrass you all in court in front of a jury of my peers. You people
>> claim to inspire people to ethical leaders? I say Bullshit. What say
>> you?
>> Say Hey to Superman for me. Will ya? Yea I know I just did but he
>> likes to keep everything in confidence while his cohorts keep me
>> falsely imprisoned. However I plan to call him to testify during my
>> pending criminal trial as I have the right to do. I should be very
>> interesting to see if he takes the fifth.
>> David R. Amos
>>
>>
>> "Elliot Gerson is responsible for the Aspen Institute's seminars,
>> including the Executive Seminar, topical and custom seminars, and
>> those offered in the Society of Fellows and Socrates programs. He also
>> manages the Institute's public programs and activities, including the
>> Aspen Ideas Festival. He is a graduate of Harvard College, Oxford
>> University, where he was a Rhodes Scholar, and Yale Law School. As
>> American Secretary of the Rhodes Trust, he manages the U.S. Rhodes
>> Scholarships and is an advisor to the Mandela Rhodes Foundation in
>> Cape Town, which focuses on African higher education and leadership.
>> He was a U. S. Supreme Court clerk and has had a career including the
>> practice of law, executive positions in state and federal government
>> and a presidential campaign, president of leading insurance and
>> healthcare companies, and service on many non-profit boards,
>> especially in the arts."
>>
>>
>> Posted by: David R. Amos at March 30, 2005 05:23 PM
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: backtalk@motherjones.com
>> Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 4:01 PM
>> Subject: Fw: Cya in court Cato
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: tpalmer@cato.org ; ghealy@cato.org ; tcarpent@cato.org ;
>> dboaz@cato.org ; rpilon@cato.org ; cpreble@cato.org ; tlynch@cato.org
>> ; blindsey@cato.org ; rlevy@cato.org ; tfirey@cato.org ;
>> ecrane@cato.org
>> Cc: Wes Penre@Illuminati News ; freedom_of_information@
>> ; Letters@globeandmail.ca ; webmaster@canadalawcourts.com ; lloyd
>> brinson ; J. D. Kuntz ; elois@newdata.ca ; Jack Hook ; John Bjornstrom
>> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 8:47 PM
>> Subject: Cya in court Cato
>>
>>
>>
>> Hey Tommy Boy
>> You invited me. These are your words correct? I tried to register on
>> line but your link does not work. I want to come. we should be in
>> agreement in most things but I know we are not and we should really
>> talk about it before I file my civil lawsuits. You people have already
>> proven to me your malice. this is your last chance to act ethically.
>> My criminal trial will begin shortly thereafter and I may call some of
>> you to testify at it. One of them could be you. I am one of those
>> people that many already turn to for an honest opinion. Right or wrong
>> they know my answer comes from sincere ethical consideration because I
>> am more a man of my word than legions of lawyers ever were. I am good
>> to my friends and sheer hell to my foes. I hate the false fronts of
>> integrity of the people you joke about within your following
>> invitation. You are joking. I am not.
>> Dear Friend,
>>
>> Would you like to be the person to whom others turn for an explanation
>> of the debate over Social Security and retirement, the economics of
>> international trade, or how to control pollution and protect the
>> environment through incentives? Would you like to be better able to
>> explain the benefits of free markets, private property, and free trade
>> to your friends, colleagues, and family members?
>>
>> If so, you should come to Washington, D.C., for the Cato University
>> seminar April 28 to May 1 on Applied Economics: User-Friendly Tools to
>> Understand Politics, Business Enterprise, and Life. The faculty
>> includes top-level economists and policy experts from universities and
>> the Cato Institute.
>>
>> The seminar will be held in the F. A. Hayek Auditorium of the Cato
>> Institute, with dinner and a tour at Mount Vernon, the historic home
>> of George Washington.
>>
>> Our goal is to help attendees become the people to whom their friends
>> turn to explain the economy and how political interference in markets
>> tends to generate disaster. And there's a reason it's being held in
>> Washington, D.C. You see, we want to change fundamentally the culture
>> of Washington, D.C. Washington's a very strange city. Most of the
>> people here spend their working days taking from Peter to give to Paul
>> (minus a substantial cut, of course). Or writing minute and
>> incomprehensible "regulations" on the optimal size of broccoli, or
>> warning people to wear sensible shoes, or just figuring out new ways
>> to strip American citizens of their rights and dignity.
>>
>> You can come to D.C. for a long weekend and learn how to change that.
>> You'll learn how to make the arguments that will convince your
>> friends, coworkers, and neighbors that they don't need or benefit from
>> all those rules, redistributions, regulations, and rip-offs.
>>
>> You're invited to attend one Cato University seminar, or two, or
>> three. Each is a stand alone seminar, but all three are complementary.
>> (The other two are on history and on the art and technique of
>> persuasion.)
>>
>> Please check out the faculty and schedule, and register using our
>> secure registration form. Online registration is safe, easy, and fast.
>>
>> Come to Washington, D.C. ... and learn how to change it.
>>
>> I look forward to welcoming you to Cato University this year.
>>
>> Cordially,
>>
>> and Signed by you. Tom Palmer
>>
>> In order not to be somehow overlooked, I just called you cell phone to
>> cell phone so that I would have a record of contact to let you know we
>> had a problem to discuss. You were to busy to talk so you missed your
>> chance. Methinks you are a fine example of the reason your buddy Gene
>> Healy and his ilk ignored me. I read enough of your work to think you
>> are a very snotty tall talking whore for the Global Corps. I wanted to
>> hear your voice to be certain my feelings were correct. You did not
>> dissappoint me. If you don't like my opinion of you, sue me and bring
>> all these emails to court. I promise I will not file a motion to
>> dismiss. In fact I can't wait to meet your lawyers. I thought what you
>> said about Bobby Fischer was far more offensive and as you can see I
>> blogged in his defense. Many people call me crazy too. That seem to be
>> the label bad actors put on someone when they are cornered. I wanted
>> you to hear my voice so that you would understand that I am not nuts
>> but very sincere. when you shunned my last words were see you in
>> court. Ignore me some more and you certainly will. Check my work
>> before you laugh and call me crazy too.
>> In order to prove you all I am serious I will send Roger Pilon, Vice
>> President for Legal Affairs at 1000 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.,
>> Washington D.C. 20001-5403 hard copy of exactly the same material I
>> sent to two Solicitor Generals last year just before I ran for
>> Parliament. Teddy Olson quit and went into private practice as soon as
>> Stephen Harper opened his mouth about the Arar Inquiry but thus far
>> Landslide Annie has hung onto hers. Now if you have any questions of
>> me before we meet, ask them to New Canadian Ambassador Franky Boy
>> McKenna. He knows exactly who I am and what has happened in the year
>> since. If you want a Yankee perspective ask John Ashcroft, John
>> Edwards. Tom Ridge, Clark Kent Ervin, Theodore Olson or David
>> Aufhauser to name a few. They all are now free agents and in the same
>> hot water as your buddy and now you.
>> I emailed ya, blogged ya, called ya and am now telling some your
>> friends plus a few of mine for good measure. Under Title 18 of the
>> federal code you are all as guilty as everyone else if you don't get
>> honest real fast. Ask Frank Quatronne and Martha Stewart about email
>> evidence in federal court
>> In light of the reasons I was falsely imprisoned and what I had sent
>> you dudes the year before it makes Cato's work in "Go Directly to
>> Jail: The Criminalization of Almost Everything." a total bullshit
>> piece of work. It is my job to properly shame you bastards so that
>> nobody will take you seriously ever again.
>>
>> "At one time, the sanction of the criminal law was reserved for
>> serious, morally culpable offenders. But during the past 40 years, an
>> unholy alliance of tough-on-crime conservatives and anti-big-business
>> liberals has utterly transformed the criminal law. Today, while
>> violent crime often goes unpunished, Congress continues to add new,
>> trivial offenses to the federal criminal code. With more than 4,000
>> federal offenses on the statute books, and thousands more buried in
>> the Code of Federal Regulations, it is now frighteningly easy for
>> American citizens to be hauled off to jail for actions that no
>> reasonable person would regard as crimes. At the same time, rampant
>> federalization and mandatory minimum sentencing are making America’s
>> criminal justice system ever more centralized and punitive. The result
>> is a labyrinthine criminal code, a burgeoning prison population, and
>> often real injustice. Go Directly to Jail examines those alarming
>> trends and proposes reforms that could rein in a criminal justice
>> apparatus at war with fairness and common sense."
>> If you dudes do not want me to turn up after being invited please let
>> me know why in writing and introduce me to the lawyer I will be
>> arguing someday in court.
>> David R. Amos
>> 153 Alvin Ave.
>> Milton, MA 02186
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: dante17678@hotmail.com
>> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 10:20 AM
>> Subject: Fw: Hunky-dory EH Petey
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: rjvattuone@aol.com
>> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 10:04 AM
>> Subject: Fw: Hunky-dory EH Petey
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: lsewell@canadians.org
>> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 7:27 AM
>> Subject: Fw: Hunky-dory EH Petey
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: jeffryhouse@hotmail.com
>> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 7:03 AM
>> Subject: Fw: Hunky-dory EH Petey
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca ; Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca ; Jack Layton ;
>> Easter.W@parl.gc.ca ; Cadman.C@parl.gc.ca ; Casey.B@parl.gc.ca ;
>> Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca
>> Cc: McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca ; Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca ;
>> macaul1@parl.gc.ca ; Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca ; Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca ;
>> Anderson.D@parl.gc.ca ; Anderson.Da@parl.gc.ca ;
>> david.anderson1@sk.sympatico.
>> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 7:12 PM
>> Subject: Hunky-dory EH Petey
>>
>>
>> I got a better one for ya Petey Boy. "Thar she blows". I bet Belinda
>> is really pissed off at everybody and is letting off some steam. If I
>> were you I would start bailing out of your new party like any other
>> rat that would desert a sinking ship. That is one boat that could
>> never float. The way you back stabbed your way into its creation will
>> likely never be forgotten. Some of the new Senators Martin just
>> appointed proved that didn't they? Right now you are just hanging on
>> and kissing Harper's arse because nobody else will ever trust you in
>> their Dory except maybe the diddler, Billy Matthews. He is used to
>> turningcoat and needs help bailing out his punky little craft. I think
>> the liberals are tired of him by now and Johnny Crosbie is likely
>> pretty pissed at him too. I think you two dudes should be good company
>> for each other as everybody else tries to distance themselves from a
>> couple of cry babies that call themselves Maritimers. You were born
>> there alright but a lair lawyer and a nasty old diddler reflect poorly
>> upon the rest of us. But bad apples fall from the best of trees. The
>> sooner the better so that they don't suck the sap out of the good
>> ones.
>> Dare to argue me Petey Boy? I am ten times meaner with no temper than
>> the man that pitches silly fits kicks chairs. I would kick your arse
>> in a good debate. I would laugh if you asked me to step outside, head
>> for the door and quit talking immediately in a sincere effort to kick
>> your arse in the street. Win or lose, rest assured I would have fun.
>> Fighting is a true Maritime tradition. EH MacKay? Feel free to try to
>> call me a liar. Everybody knows it would be a case of the pot trying
>> to call the kettle black.
>>
>> "The Nova Scotia MP described his relations with Conservative Leader
>> Stephen Harper as "hunky-dory, everything's great - that's a good
>> Maritime phrase."
>> Forwarded Message
>>
>> Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:14:47 -0800 (PST)
>>
>> From: David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>
>> Subject: Attn Don Amos
>>
>> To: MEC.investors@magnaent.com, dhart@pattersonpalmer.ca,
>> smay@pattersonpalmer.ca
>>
>> As I stated within an earlier email, Scott Daruty finally called me
>> back and pissed me off. He picked the wrong guy to try and toy with. I
>> will take up my concerns with Magna byway of Daruty and Cellucci down
>> here in the Yankee courts. I have much proof of what I sent Belinda
>> Stronach long before she ever became a Member of Parliament up home. I
>> will deal with her in a political fashion first to see if she is
>> interested in up holding the public trust while protecting her
>> interests in Magna. Good luck with your conscience as a lawyer named
>> Amos as you check my work. Here is my phone number 506 434-1379
>> begin_of_the_skype_
>> end_of_the_skype_highlighting if you have any questions before
>> deciding whether or not to uphold the law and protect the investor's
>> interests in Magna from my necessary civil actions. I gave my material
>> to Argeo P. Cellucci in Canada in July of 2002 before I sent the
>> Sheriffs out with my first complaints. I know by the fax numbers at
>> the top of my first complaint that it was Ashcroft and Cellucci that
>> directed the US Attorney to try to make my complaints evaporate. Now
>> that Cellucci speaks for Magna and Belinda speaks for Canadians there
>> is a couple of Amos boys that should have along talk about many
>> things. But forget trying to label me as your brother until I am
>> assured of your integrity. I have a high contempt towards lawyers and
>> their sense of ethics for very justifiable reasons.
>>
>> Note: forwarded message attached.
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: dhart@pattersonpalmer.ca ; moto maniac ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca ;
>> kbar@nbnet.nb.ca ; danthebagelman@msn.com ; info@electtomobrien.com ;
>> lcampenella@ledger.com ; jeff.mockler@gnb.ca ; newsonline@bbc.co.uk ;
>> Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ;
>> Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ; Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.
>> Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.
>> MEC.investors@magnaent.com
>> Cc: zedp@parl.gc.ca ; rmooremp@nb.sympatico.ca ; savoya2@parl.gc.ca ;
>> thompg@nb.sympatico.ca ; john_kerry@kerry.senate.gov ;
>> martib@sen.parl.gc.ca ; dougchristielaw@shaw.ca ;
>> Mayor@ci.boston.ma.us ; Stephen.Murphy@ci.boston.ma.us ;
>> Governor.Rell@po.state.ct.us ; smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ;
>> johnduggan@legalaid.nf.ca ; brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca ;
>> McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ; david@lutz.nb.ca ;
>> cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.
>> INFO7@elections.ca ; inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca ; cotlei@parl.gc.ca
>> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 12:14 PM
>> Subject: Shame on you Della
>>
>>
>> At least I am a man of my word. I called you personally as I stated I
>> would. I have the record of the call that I was directed to do by your
>> boss, Stevey Boy May. Too bad you would not speak to me to protect
>> your own interests. At least I have your signature because no word
>> from you is worthless to me. You can never claim ignorance of my
>> concerns after directing me to your lawyer. I stuck my hand out to you
>> as a layman but you had picked your friends the lawyers and had
>> enlisted them to bite it? Do you really Think I am afraid of dealing
>> with the likes of Johnny Crosbie and Stevey Boy May when I am
>> preparing a lawsuit against the likes of John Edwards, John Ashcroft
>> and Theodore Olson to name a few? Plus there is the irrefutable fact
>> that you and the law firm you work for have already admitted that you
>> are aware of the crimes practiced against me. You have done nothing to
>> uphold the law and have already filed the evidence of that fact in the
>> Newfoundland Supreme Court. Lady, either I or my estate will bankrupt
>> you and your firm with its own sworn testimony that you witnessed. You
>> can take that to the bank. The first question I must ask you Della
>> what did your law fir do with its copy of the police surveillance tape
>> # 139 and did you listen to it? You should not have because you are
>> not an officer of the court nor are you employed by law enforcement.
>> The Lieutenant Governor Roberts notified me that he had given his
>> copies of the material to Tommy Marshall to be investigated but I have
>> received no word from your law firm as to what the hell they did with
>> their copies. Have your lawyers explain their integrity to you because
>> you and I will never come to an understanding of ethical behavior
>> after your treatment of me today. I often sing the praises of Newfys
>> because they are amongst the nicest folks on the planet excepting of
>> course their lawyers and their cohorts such as you Della. By the way I
>> heard about the clerks in Supreme Court having a little wager over who
>> buys lunch if I managed to do what I said I would do. I would like to
>> meet the lady who felt I was as serious as a heart attack and willing
>> to buy lunch if I was not a man of my word. I would love to buy her
>> lunch some time because the courts need more folks like her in their
>> employment. She clearly did not disregard the word of a common man.
>> On the other hand after our exchange of the mere few words today it
>> would not be wise for me to trust your word or typing if I had left
>> the voicemail you desired. I have much evidence of many edited
>> transcripts of things I have said in the past. You and I will argue
>> them some day no doubt byway of your lawyer friends because I think
>> you don't speak pro se very well in order to protect your personal
>> interests. I just got off the phone with one of Frank Stronach's
>> Yankee lawyers Scott Daruty. He did me the service of really pissing
>> me off today by finally calling me back after I had torn a piece off
>> of Magna in Canada about his neglect of duty on their behalf. He
>> thought he was funny by joking that the Canadian lawyer, Don Amos was
>> my brother. No lawyer is a brother of mine. He thought I was joking
>> when I told him I would sue him personally if he did not uphold the
>> law and rat out Magna's brand new Vice President his brother, Argeo P.
>> Cellucci so I had to repeat myself so he would understand me in no
>> uncertain terms. I do make a lot of jokes about very serious business
>> however it would not be wise to underestimate my sincerity and attempt
>> to toy with me. I enjoy a good fight win or lose as long as I stand on
>> the right side of the battle. You just picked a fight with me lady on
>> a day when I ain't taking prisoners from lawyers or their cohorts. All
>> lawyers are liars and I have proven it. It is only laymen I will
>> settle with from now on and only if they tell the truth, the whole
>> truth and nothing but the truth.
>> I don't care if your god helps you or not. We can all do it again in
>> hell for all I care.
>> From now on I must rely on hard copy of my own creation. For now I
>> will send you and Stevey Boy a bunch of emails that have been
>> forwarded to many other people first. I require the record of doing
>> so. Whereas I have no doubt Stevey Boy will wan to argue about the
>> emails I have already sent I figure why not be hung for a cow as a
>> calf? Since everything in heaven and hell is done in threes. I will
>> forward to Magna's lawyer, Don Amos, Stevey Boy and three large emails
>> that contain Tiff files. There is no need to be redundant with hard
>> copy already sent to Scott Daruty and Johnny Crosbie. You can tell the
>> folks at Patterson Palmer who directed you to offend me that the
>> emails contain exactly the same documents that Greg Byrne and Johnny
>> Crosbie received and that you should all prepare to argue every word
>> within in them. The first email contains a file called Big Day. It
>> contains every document I served upon Two Solicitors Generals Theodore
>> Olson and Anne McLellan before I ran for Parliament and Olson quit his
>> job on June 24th immediately after Johnny Crosbie told Stevey Harper
>> to shut up about the Arar Inquiry. the second file is called Big
>> Canada Add and it is a copy of the documents served upon my political
>> opponents while running for Parliament. Last but not least are what
>> was added to the first to pile of documents and then served upon
>> Patterson and Palmer by way of Greg Byrne.
>> Scott Daruty is receiving the documents within "Big Day" and other
>> interesting material that Magna should find quite interesting to say
>> the least. Magna really made my day when they appointed Cellucci and
>> their new VP. I is comical that he is going to lobby the government
>> about horse racing especially after listening to what is recorded on a
>> lot of the tapes and the fact that the top dog of the RCMP had to
>> teach that dumb Yankee how to ride a horse last summer so that he
>> would not make an ass out himself at the Calgary Stampede. This was
>> almost as rich as when Martin sent Franky McKenna to Washington after
>> he and I had a spit and chew about dogs and pork. At least I am clever
>> enough to realize when I am a lucky man and how to make the best out
>> of a golden opportunity to see that justice is served upon some very
>> nasty bastards. I am very pissed off but still having more fun than
>> ten men. I love cornering lawyers and listening to them stutter and
>> try to duck the issues. I will wager that you are having a bad day
>> too. EH Della? It looks good on you if you are. Why not get mad? I
>> hope you share your anger with the others at Patterson and Palmer and
>> start bitchin about me. Never forget all I want is the truth from you.
>> It will cost you nothing. Why do you want to stand with crooks and
>> liars for a days pay? I bet you have witnessed lots of dirty dealings.
>> I truly beleive that there is no honour in your work. To me working
>> for lawyers is like a lady being sent to a nunnery in Medieval times.
>> I share ol Shake's opinion of such a place. Times changes nothing
>> lawyers still work for Jesuits. Look around downtown St John's and
>> call me a liar. I dare ya. Even the name of the town says it all.
>> Cya'll in Court:)
>> David R. Amos
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Amos
>> To: dhart@pattersonpalmer.ca ; moto maniac ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca ;
>> kbar@nbnet.nb.ca ; danthebagelman@msn.com ; info@electtomobrien.com ;
>> lcampenella@ledger.com ; jeff.mockler@gnb.ca ; newsonline@bbc.co.uk ;
>> Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ;
>> Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ; Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.
>> Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.
>> Cc: zedp@parl.gc.ca ; rmooremp@nb.sympatico.ca ; savoya2@parl.gc.ca ;
>> thompg@nb.sympatico.ca ; john_kerry@kerry.senate.gov ;
>> martib@sen.parl.gc.ca ; dougchristielaw@shaw.ca ;
>> Mayor@ci.boston.ma.us ; Stephen.Murphy@ci.boston.ma.us ;
>> Governor.Rell@po.state.ct.us ; smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ;
>> johnduggan@legalaid.nf.ca ; brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca ;
>> McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ; david@lutz.nb.ca ;
>> cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.
>> INFO7@elections.ca ; inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca ; cotlei@parl.gc.ca
>> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 8:33 AM
>> Subject: RE: Me versus Patterson and Palmer
>>
>>
>> Hey Della,
>> I see that Stevey Boy is on vacation and told me to contact you. I am
>> happy to hear that he is saving all of my emails in a special spot for
>> some apparent future litigation. I keep very good records as well and
>> look forward to his argument but I will wager that I sue him first.
>> I see by the following Affidavit you witnessed and Stevey Boy filed in
>> court that every lawyer within Patterson Palmer is a flat out liar. I
>> served Greg Byryne in Fredericton myself with witnesses before Byron
>> Prior served everyone else in Newfoundland. If Byrne did not share the
>> info with his buddy Johnny Crosbie, it is not my fault. Yet I suspect
>> that he did so out of the gate because he sent me an email in which it
>> appears that he was conferring with many others about me and my
>> concerns. It was too funny that Byrne clicked the wrong button and
>> forwarded his email to me as well.
>> I also sent many of your people the same emails that I sent to Byrne
>> and May as soon as I got out off jail last October and Stevey Boy
>> first contacted Byron Prior and I had called him. (Thank you for
>> making a transcript of my voicemail and filing it in court for me. It
>> is quite hard for me to make lawyers even admit that I exist) Some of
>> the aforesaid emails were responded to by other members of your law
>> firm byway of their computers like Stevey Boy's just did. At least
>> computers are far more honest than the lawyers that own them. I am
>> compelled to rely on the integrity of their machines and the ability
>> of their computers and mine to keep perfect records. (Never forget I
>> am being prosecuted for sending an email to a lawyer I have been
>> litigating against for years who even went as far to fraudulently
>> create a document bearing my signature) Because of the fact I can
>> prove contact with many members of the law firm you work for, they can
>> never say that they did not know of my concerns and allegations long
>> before Stevey complained of Byron Prior's actions on behalf of his
>> client Billy Matthews. He only went forward with his malicious threat
>> when he thought my goose was cooked down here. There is quite simply
>> no way you could have prepared his filing on January 21st and he had
>> Judge green sign it in the time between Byron had served it and the
>> Judge signed it without the Bastards reading our private emails and
>> listening to our phone calls. I sent the last email containing the
>> words to Byron's counterclaim just before I went to court that morning
>> and he only managed to see it filed by 3 PM Newfy time. You may be a
>> fast typists but the courts don't work that fast unless they are
>> covering up something big time. No know as well as I that is true
>> because the judge and Stevey Boy do not even want other lawyers to
>> view the public record. Small wonder he took a vacation. If Stevey Boy
>> has any semblance of a conscience he no doubt has trouble dealing with
>> himself. I can only wonder if he and Johnny Crosbie are singing for
>> more tequila right now.
>> As you no doubt know I am preparing to defend myself in a criminal
>> trial in the USA and filing some rather profound civil lawsuits in
>> Canada and the USA that will make the whining of Billy Matthews in
>> Newfoundland Supreme court seem rather comical. I will be filing
>> copies of the documents you no doubt helped create for Stevey Boy May
>> on behalf of your law firm in many courts.
>> If Greg Byrne, the former Minister of Justice and Attorney General of
>> New Brunswick had acted ethically last September while I was in Canada
>> and under Brad Green's jurisdiction I would not have been falsely
>> imprisoned in the USA the following month. I will be suing him, your
>> law firm and many others for personal injury and conspiracy to cover
>> up the many crimes practiced against my Clan and I. My question to
>> you, Della is why don't I sue you too? As you can see if you have read
>> my work my battle is with corrupt lawyers not layman. I would settle
>> with you in a heartbeat for costs if you would be honest about all
>> that you know to be true. If you decide to go against me I suggest
>> that you seek legal counsel outside of your law firm or in fact all of
>> Newfoundland. I am about to take on every damned lawyer within the
>> Newfoundland law Society. You would not be wise to doubt me before you
>> have a look at my work in the USA. I will deal with Newfys under the
>> heading of fun after I have embarrassed the Yankees.
>> I will give you a call as Stevey Boy suggests so that at least you can
>> understand that I am not an unreasonable person and not the sort of
>> person that lawyers claim that I am. I am just a simple, sincere and
>> serious man that refuses to play the wicked games lawyers play. I am
>> willing to die in order to expose the truth. No lawyer can say that.
>> they love money to much to be willing to miss the chance to spend it.
>> Judge me for yourself and your own best interests before you choose
>> whom to stand with.
>> Whether you believe me or not I am battling for your rights as well as
>> my own. I am forwarding this email to many ordinary people like you
>> and me. To Hell with the lawyers and politicians. They do what they do
>> for personal gain not public service. Their concerns are lucre not
>> justice and everybody knows it. All I did was go to great lengths to
>> prove it. There is no need for you and I to argue about simple truths.
>> As far as I am concerned up until the time you received this email all
>> you have done is type things and witness signatures. However you
>> cannot say that anymore.
>> My pending phone call to you is not harassment. I need the Yankee
>> phone bill record of my call to you in order to assist in the defence
>> of my freedom in the USA. Stevey Boy told me to call ya. Please be
>> nice. After today you can't say that you are not involved in my false
>> imprisonment in the USA. I am doing no more or less than Stevey Boy
>> and his malicious clients would do if the same thing had happened to
>> them. If Billy Matthews had been summoned to the USA while he was
>> running for his seat in Parliament to be presecuted by an unsigned
>> criminal complaint and then held without bail under the charges of
>> "other", he would be more pissed off than I am.
>> Cya'll in Court:)
>> David R. Amos
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "May, Steve"
>> To: "David Amos"
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 8:32 PM
>> Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Dan and Tom Remember me
>>
>>
>> Mr. May is out of the office till 11 April 2005. He will not be
>> checking his e-mail. Please contact Della Hart at 709-570-5527
>> begin_of_the_skype_
>> end_of_the_skype_highlighting or dhart@pattersonpalmer.ca if you
>> require immediate assistance.
>>
>>
>> 2005 01 T 0010
>> IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
>> TRIAL DIVISION
>> BETWEEN:
>> WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF
>> AND:
>> BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT
>>
>> AND BETWEEN:
>> BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT/PLAINTIFF
>> BY COUNTERCLAIM
>>
>> AND: WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF/FIRST DEFENDANT
>> BY COUNTERCLAIM
>>
>> AND: T. ALEX HICKMAN SECOND DEFENDANT
>> BY COUNTERCLAIM
>>
>> AND: THOMAS MARSHALL THIRD DEFENDANT
>> BY COUNTERCLAIM
>>
>> AND: DANNY WILLIAMS FOURTH DEFENDANT
>> BY COUNTERCLAIM
>>
>> AND: EDWARD M. ROBERTS FIFTH DEFENDANT
>> BY COUNTERCLAIM
>>
>> AND: JOHN CROSBIE SIXTH DEFENDANT
>> BY COUNTERCLAIM
>>
>> AND: PATTERSON PALMER SEVENTH DEFENDANT
>> BY COUNTERCLAIM
>> SUMMARY OF CURRENT DOCUMENTCourt File Number(s):2005 01 T 0010Date of
>> Filing of Document:25 January 2005Name of Filing Party or
>> Person:Stephen J. MayApplication to which Document being filed
>> relates:Amended Application of the Plaintiff/Defendant by Counterclaim
>> to maintain an Order restricting publication, to strike portions of
>> the Statement of Defence, strike the Counterclaim in it’s entirety,
>> and to refer this proceeding to case management.Statement of purpose
>> in filing:To maintain an Order restricting publication, to strike
>> portions of the Statement of Defence, strike the Counterclaim in its
>> entirety and refer this proceeding to case management.
>> A F F I D A V I T
>>
>> I, Stephen J. May, of the City of St. John’s, in the Province of
>> Newfoundland and Labrador, Barrister and Solicitor, make oath and say
>> as follows:
>>
>> THAT I am a Partner in the St. John’s office of PATTERSON PALMER
>> solicitors for William Matthews, the Member of Parliament for
>> Random-Burin-St. George’s in the Parliament of Canada.
>>
>> THAT Mr. Matthews originally retained Mr. Edward Roberts, Q.C. on or
>> about 30 April 2002 after Mr. Byron Prior, the Defendant/Plaintiff by
>> Counterclaim, had made allegations against Mr. Matthews in a
>> publication called “My Inheritance - The truth - Not Fiction: A Town
>> with a Secret”. In that publication, the allegation was made that Mr.
>> Matthews had had sex with a girl who had been prostituted by her
>> mother. That girl was alleged to have been Mr. Prior’s sister.
>>
>> THAT upon being retained, Mr. Edward Roberts wrote a letter to Mr.
>> Prior. That letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit “1" to my
>> Affidavit.
>>
>> THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts’ letter to Mr. Prior, Mr. Roberts
>> received a 1 May 2002 e-mail from Mr. Prior. That e-mail is attached
>> as Exhibit “2".
>>
>> THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts receipt of the e-mail, Mr. Prior swore
>> an Affidavit acknowledging that what had been said in that publication
>> was false. That Affidavit is attached as Exhibit “3" to my Affidavit.
>> Following Mr. Roberts’ receipt of that Affidavit, Mr. Matthews advised
>> that he was satisfied not to pursue the matter any further and our
>> firm closed our file.
>>
>> THAT on or about 25 October 2004, I was retained by Mr. Matthews
>> following his gaining knowledge that a web site, made a series of
>> allegations against him relating to my having sex with a girl of
>> approximately 12 years old through to an approximate age of 15 years
>> old. It also accused him of being a father of one of her children and
>> accused him of having raped that girl. Upon checking the web site I
>> saw that Byron Prior, the Defendant, had been identified as the author
>> of the material on the site.
>>
>> THAT Mr. Matthews instructed me to write Mr. Prior, to remind him of
>> the fact that the allegations had been admitted to being false through
>> a 16 May 2002 Affidavit to advise him of Mr. Matthews’ intentions to
>> commence legal proceedings if the comments were not removed from the
>> web site. A copy of my letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit “4"
>> to this Affidavit.
>>
>> THAT I attach as Exhibit “5" a transcript from a 5 November 2004
>> voicemail left by David Amos, identified in the voicemail as a friend
>> of Mr. Prior.
>>
>> THAT I attach as Exhibit “6" a portion of a 6 November 2004 e-mail
>> from Mr. Amos.
>>
>> THAT until I received his voicemail and e-mail, I had never heard of Mr.
>> Amos.
>>
>> THAT Mr. Amos has continued to send me e-mail since his 5 November
>> e-mail. Including his 6 November 2004 e-mail, I have received a total
>> of 15 e-mails as of 23 January 2005. All do not address Mr. Matthews’
>> claim or my involvement as Mr. Matthews’ solicitor. I attach as
>> Exhibit “7" a portion of a 12 January 2005 e-mail that Mr. Amos sent
>> to me but originally came to my attention through Ms. Lois Skanes
>> whose firm had received a copy. This e-mail followed the service of
>> the Statement of Claim on 11 January 2005 on Mr. Prior. I also attach
>> as Exhibit “8" a copy of a 19 January 2005 e-mail from Mr. Amos.
>>
>> THAT I attach as Exhibit “9" a copy of a 22 November 2004 letter
>> addressed to me from Edward Roberts, the Lieutenant Governor of
>> Newfoundland and Labrador covering a 2 September 2004 letter from Mr.
>> Amos addressed to John Crosbie, Edward Roberts, in his capacity as
>> Lieutenant Governor, Danny Williams, in his capacity as Premier of
>> Newfoundland and Labrador, and Brian F. Furey, President of the Law
>> Society of Newfoundland and Labrador. I requested a copy of this
>> letter from Government House after asking Mr. Roberts if he had
>> received any correspondence from Mr. Amos during his previous
>> representation of Mr. Matthews. He advised me that he received a
>> letter since becoming Lieutenant Governor, portions of which involved
>> his representation of Mr. Matthews. Mr. Roberts’ letter also covered
>> his reply to Mr. Amos.
>>
>> THAT I attach as Exhibit “10" an e-mail from Mr. Amos received on
>> Sunday, 23 January 2005.
>>
>> THAT I swear this Affidavit in support of the Application to strike
>> Mr. Prior’s counterclaim.
>>
>>
>> SWORN to before me at
>> St. John’s, Province of Newfoundland
>> and Labrador this 24th day of
>> January, 2005.
>>
>>
>> Signed by Della Hart STEPHEN J. MAY Signature
>> STAMP
>> DELLA HART
>> A Commissioner for Oaths in and for
>> the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador.
>> My commission expires on December 31, 2009.
>> The Conservatives in Canada have very Punky Dory EH Tommy Boy?
>>
>> Posted by: David R. Amos at March 30, 2005 05:26 PM
>> The Cato dudes ain't got nothin on me when it comes to letter writing.
>> Here is where I am teasing abunch of dumb Yankees. The whole world
>> calls our Newfys dumb. So what does that say of Danny williams the
>> Premier? He is a Rhodes Scholar that works for free. Is he dumb or
>> evil? I will have to ask the Aspen Dudes have I attend Tommy's little
>> hoe down EH?
>>
>> Posted by: David R. Amos at March 30, 2005 05:38 PM
>> http://pogoblog.typepad.com/
>> HMMM no link we will try this way ok?
>>
>> Posted by: David R. Amos at March 30, 2005 05:40 PM
>> I'm very proud to have had such a person as David Amos, help us with
>> our fight and the legal work. I will never be able to repay him.Thank
>> you David.
>> Byron Prior
>>
>> Posted by: Byron Prior at August 21, 2005 10:59 PM
>> keno hot spot califorina lottery odds of wining keno sandles
>> http://tibidoh.stals.ru/keno/
>> http://tibidoh.stals.ru/keno/
>> california state keno odds information ohayou - keno mp
>> http://tibidoh.stals.ru/keno/
>> free keno http://tibidoh.stals.ru/keno/
>> theatres keno casino_html
>> http://tibidoh.stals.ru/keno/
>>
>> Posted by: wildball keno at December 23, 2005 10:46 PM
>> This is great stuff! I can't wait to see how things end for David! An
>> "edge of the seat" and "mile a minute" thriller with unsuspected
>> twists and turns! Keep up the good work! When it comes to writing
>> fictional thrillers with international intrigue and betrayals, John
>> LeCarre has met his match. Love it!
>>
>> Posted by: MFH at January 24, 2006 02:05 PM
>> Post a comment
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:35:16 -0300
>> Subject: Fwd: I called the crook from Calgary Jason Kenney to remind
>> him of the documents his office recieved from during the election of
>> the 40th Parliament
>> To: breitg@parl.gc.ca, hollam@parl.gc.ca, Mourani.Ma@parl.gc.ca,
>> wrzesb@parl.gc.ca, Kania.A@parl.gc.ca, McColeman.P@parl.gc.ca,
>> gloves@parl.gc.ca, rick@ricknorlock.ca, macked@parl.gc.ca,
>> Desnoyers.L@parl.gc.ca, rathgb0@parl.gc.ca, SECU@parl.gc.ca
>> Cc: zorroboy2009@hotmail.com, tony@peoplestandup.ca,
>> waterwarcrimes@gmail.com, whistleblower <whistleblower@ctv.ca>,
>> "ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca" <ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca>, vickiconrad
>> < vickiconrad@nsndp.ca>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 19:33:09 -0300
>> Subject: Fwd: I called the crook from Calgary Jason Kenney to remind
>> him of the documents his office recieved from during the election of
>> the 40th Parliament
>> To: peter.teasdale@gov.ab.ca, larry.stein@gov.ab.ca
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 13:52:15 -0300
>> Subject: I called the crook from Calgary Jason Kenney to remind him of
>> the documents his office recieved from during the election of the 40th
>> Parliament
>> To: kennej@parl.gc.ca, godiny <godiny@parl.gc.ca>, toewsv1
>> < toewsv1@mts.net>, Mackap <Mackap@parl.gc.ca>, robin reid
>> < zorroboy2009@hotmail.com>, "ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca"
>> < ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca>, tony <tony@peoplestandup.ca>,
>> WaterWarCrimes <waterwarcrimes@gmail.com>, "Wayne.Lang"
>> < Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "John.DeWinter"
>> < John.DeWinter@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>> < billestabrooks@navnet.net>
>> Cc: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "info@gg.ca" <info@gg.ca>, info
>> < info@wildrosealliance.ca>, info <info@greenparty.ca>, IgnatM
>> < IgnatM@parl.gc.ca>, LaytoJ <LaytoJ@parl.gc.ca>
>>
>> His snotty help picked a very bad day to play games with me EH Vic
>> Toews? Although Kenney never cared about my human rights as he laughed
>> while i was falsely imprisoned and my children were sexualy harassed
>> and threatened at least he cannot deny receiving my documents twice
>> thanx to an ethical government computer EH stevey boy Harper?
>>
>> http://www.jasonkenney.ca/EN/
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Minister <Minister@cic.gc.ca>
>> Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 12:39:27 -0400
>> Subject: RE: Sept 23rd is coming fast for another Yankee War Resister
>> eh Mr Harper?
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>>
>> La version française suit.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> This is an automatic acknowledgement of your e-mail addressed to the
>> Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism.
>>
>>
>>
>> If this is a request for case information, the responsibility placed
>> on us by the Privacy Act to protect all personal information precludes
>> us from responding using e-mail unless we are able to verify that you
>> are entitled/authorized to receive the case specific information. In
>> this respect, if you are the applicant and you provide us with your
>> full name, date of birth, and a file number or Citizenship and
>> Immigration Canada (CIC) client ID, or you are a person to whom we are
>> authorized to release information (written consent on the citizenship
>> or immigration file) and are able to provide the applicant's full
>> name, DOB and the file number or CIC client ID, you will receive a
>> reply by e-mail within 10 - 30 working days. If you are not the
>> applicant or you are not authorized to receive the information, you
>> will not receive a further reply to your e-mail. Please note that we
>> will not respond to e-mails concerning the following:
>>
>>
>>
>> * Assessment of points/qualifications.
>> * Calculation of time for citizenship eligibility, visit
>> www.cic.gc.ca/english/e-
>> * Refusal of an application by immigration or visa officials.
>> * Complaints about the Call Centre (will be sent to CIC officials for
>> necessary action/information).
>> * Processing of Permanent Resident Cards (will be sent to the
>> Permanent Resident Card Processing Centre for necessary
>> action/information).
>> * Processing of Citizenship applications (will be sent to the Case
>> Processing Centre in Sydney).
>> * Requests to expedite processing of cases (will be sent to the
>> processing office).
>> * Travel documents/requirements for travel to other countries.
>> * Complaints about U.S. Immigration.
>> * Issuance of Canadian passports (please consult
>> www.passportcanada.gc.ca ).
>> * Canadian citizens outside Canada seeking assistance (please consult
>> www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca ).
>> * Opinions about recent announcements/news releases/cases.
>> * Information about visiting, living, working or studying in Canada
>> (please consult www.cic.gc.ca <http://www.cic.gc.ca/> ).
>> * Information about services in Canada
>> (www.goingtocanada.gc.ca/
>> * Requests to confirm the legitimacy of a lawyer, consultant or
>> organization.
>> * Requests for employment with the federal government (please consult
>> http://jobs-emplois.gc.ca).
>> * Complaints about consultants (Please visit www.csic-scci.ca )
>>
>>
>>
>> Please note that e-mail is not a secure channel of communication. CIC
>> is not liable for the unauthorized disclosure of personal information
>> to or the misuse of that information by a third party where we took
>> reasonable means to verify the identity of the party.
>>
>>
>>
>> For more information about CIC, please visit one of the following sites.
>>
>>
>>
>> * General information - visit www.cic.gc.ca <http://www.cic.gc.ca/>
>> * For the Call Centre, please visit
>> www.cic.gc.ca/english/
>> < http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/
>> * For a list of visa offices, please visit
>> http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/
>> < http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/
>> * Application forms - visit
>> http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/
>> * Permanent Resident Card - visit
>> http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/
>> * Sponsor your family - visit
>> http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/
>> < http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/
>> * Immigrating to Canada - visit
>> http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/
>> < http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/
>> * Refugees - visit http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/
>> * Citizenship - visit
>> http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/
>> < http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/
>> * Announcements/News Releases - visit
>> http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/
>>
>>
>>
>> For on-line services provided by CIC such as a change of address or to
>> check your application status, visit
>> www.cic.gc.ca/english/e-
>>
>> ______________________________
>>
>>
>> Ceci est un accusé de réception automatique au courriel que vous avez
>> acheminé au Ministre de la Citoyenneté, de l'Immigration et du
>> Multiculturalisme.
>>
>> Si ce courriel concerne une demande de renseignements sur l'état
>> d'avancement d'un dossier, nous devons souligner que la Loi canadienne
>> sur la protection des renseignements personnels interdit la
>> transmission d'information personnelle par voie électronique à moins
>> que nous ne soyons en mesure de vérifier que vous êtes autorisé à
>> recevoir cette information. Ainsi, si vous êtes le demandeur principal
>> et que vous nous fournissez votre nom complet, votre date de naissance
>> et le numéro de dossier ou le numéro d'identité du client attribué par
>> Citoyenneté et Immigration Canada (CIC), ou si vous êtes une personne
>> autorisée à recevoir des renseignements (consentement écrit au dossier
>> d'immigration ou de citoyenneté) et que vous nous fournissez le nom
>> complet du demandeur, sa date de naissance et le numéro de dossier ou
>> le numéro d'identité du client attribué par CIC, vous recevrez une
>> réponse par courriel dans un délai de 10 à 30 jours ouvrables. Si vous
>> n'êtes pas le demandeur ou que vous n'êtes pas autorisé à recevoir de
>> l'information, nous ne donnerons pas suite à votre courriel. Prière
>> de noter que nous ne répondrons pas aux courriels concernant les
>> questions suivantes :
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> · Évaluation des points/compétences.
>>
>> · Pour le calcul du temps de résidence pour présenter
>> une demande de citoyenneté, visitez l'adresse suivante :
>> http://www.cic.gc.ca/francais/
>>
>> · Refus d'une demande par les agents responsables d'un
>> bureau des visas ou d'un Centre d'immigration du Canada.
>>
>> · Plaintes concernant le télécentre (seront transmises
>> aux représentants de CIC pour suite à donner/information).
>>
>> · Traitement des cartes de résident permanent (les
>> demandes seront envoyées au Centre de traitement des demandes pour
>> suivi/information).
>>
>> · Traitement des demandes de citoyenneté (celles-ci
>> seront transmises au Centre de traitement des demandes de Sydney).
>>
>> · Demandes pour accélérer le traitement d'un dossier
>> (les demandes seront envoyées au bureau responsable).
>>
>> · Documents de voyages/exigences pour voyager dans
>> d'autres pays.
>>
>> · Plaintes concernant les Service d'immigration des Etats-Unis.
>>
>> · Délivrance des passeports canadiens (veuillez
>> consulter le site www.passeportcanada.gc.ca ).
>>
>> · Citoyens canadiens à l'extérieur ayant besoin d'aide
>> (veuillez consulter le site www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca ).
>>
>> · Commentaires ou vues sur les annonces et communiqués
>> du Ministre ou sur un cas.
>>
>> · Information générale pour visiter, étudier ou
>> travailler au Canada (veuillez consulter notre site au www.cic.gc.ca
>> < http://www.cic.gc.ca/> ).
>>
>> · Information sur des services disponibles au Canada
>> (www.serendreaucanada.gc.ca/
>>
>> · Demandes de confirmation de la légitimité d'un
>> avocat, consultant ou organisme.
>>
>> · Demandes d'emploi avec le gouvernement fédéral
>> (veuillez consulter le site www.jobs-emplois.gc.ca).
>>
>> · Plaintes concernant les consultants, veuillez
>> consulter le site (www.csic-scci.ca/fr/ )
>>
>>
>>
>> Veuillez noter que le courriel n'est pas une voie de communication
>> protégée. CIC se décharge de toute responsabilité pour ce qui est de
>> la divulgation non autorisée de renseignements personnels à une tierce
>> partie ou de la mauvaise utilisation de ces renseignements par une
>> tierce partie s'il a pris des mesures raisonnables pour s'assurer de
>> l'identité de cette partie.
>>
>>
>>
>> Pour plus de renseignements sur notre ministère, visitez les sites
>> suivants :
>>
>> Information générale : www.cic.gc.ca
>>
>> Pour l'adresse du télécentre:
>> http://www.cic.gc.ca/francais/
>>
>> Pour la liste des bureaux des visas à l'étranger :
>> http://www.cic.gc.ca/francais/
>>
>> Formulaires de demande :
>> http://www.cic.gc.ca/francais/
>>
>> Carte de résident permanent :
>> http://www.cic.gc.ca/francais/
>>
>> Parrainer des membres de la famille :
>> http://www.cic.gc.ca/francais/
>>
>> Immigrer au Canada : http://www.cic.gc.ca/francais/
>>
>> Réfugié : http://www.cic.gc.ca/francais/
>>
>> Citoyenneté : http://www.cic.gc.ca/francais/
>>
>> Annonces et communiqués récents du Ministre:
>> http://www.cic.gc.ca/francais/
>>
>>
>>
>> Pour effectuer un changement d'adresse ou pour vérifier l'état de
>> votre demande d'immigration, consultez les services en ligne à
>> l'adresse suivante :
>> http://www.cic.gc.ca/francais/
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 04:09:14 -0300
>> Subject: Sept 23rd is coming fast for another Yankee War Resister eh Mr
>> Harper?
>> To: "Harper.S@parl.gc.ca" <Harper.S@parl.gc.ca>, Minister@cic.gc.ca,
>> Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca, resisters@sympatico.ca,
>> Layton.J@parl.gc.ca
>> Cc: nelsonresisters@gmail.com, montrealresisters@hotmail.com,
>> vlannon@pacificcoast.net, goresisters@gmail.com,
>> londonresisters@yahoo.ca, vanresisters@yahoo.ca,
>> laverne_mott@ao.uscourts.gov, Angus.C@parl.gc.ca,
>> Atamenenko.A@parl.gc.ca, Bell.C@parl.gc.ca, Bevington.D@parl.gc.ca,
>> Black.D@parl.gc.ca, Blaikie.B@parl.gc.ca, Charlton.C@parl.gc.ca,
>> Chow.O@parl.gc.ca, Christopherson.D@parl.gc.ca, Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca,
>> Crowder.J@parl.gc.ca, Cullen.N@parl.gc.ca, Davies.L@parl.gc.ca,
>> Dewar.P@parl.gc.ca, Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca, Julian.P@parl.gc.ca,
>> Marston.W@parl.gc.ca, Martin.P@parl.gc.ca, Martin.T@parl.gc.ca,
>> Masse.B@parl.gc.ca, Mathyssen.I@parl.gc.ca, McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca,
>> Nash.P@parl.gc.ca, Priddy.P@parl.gc.ca, Savoie.D@parl.gc.ca,
>> Siksay.B@parl.gc.ca, Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca, Wasylycia-Leis.J@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> When do ya think one will ignore his dumb lawyer such as Jeffry House,
>> sprout some balls, print a pdf file and say my name?
>>
>> Before polling day would benefit all Canadains not just the wannabes and
>> the
>> wannabe Prime Ministers eh Jacky boy Layton? .
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>> If your too chicken to print a pdf file perhaps you can watch Youtube
>> then
>> EH Jacky Boy Layton?
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:16 PM
>> Subject: Maybe Corey Glass should contact me before Harper gives him the
>> boot EH? 506 756 8687
>> To: nelsonresisters@gmail.com, montrealresisters@hotmail.com,
>> vlannon@pacificcoast.net, goresisters@gmail.com,
>> londonresisters@yahoo.ca,
>> vanresisters@yahoo.ca
>> Cc: Minister@cic.gc.ca, Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca,
>> resisters@sympatico.ca
>>
>>
>> http://canadianpress.google.
>>
>> His purported friend Lee Zaslofsky would not give me his contact
>> number for some strange reason i will never understand.
>>
>> I would lay odds that would have be different if I had been elected
>> in the last couple of elections or was player within one of the
>> established politcal parties. It certainly appears to me that fellow
>> concerned Canadian citizens don't count to American war protesters and
>> their outspoken supporters unless they are politcally connected EH
>> Mikey Ignatieff AKA Canada's Prince of Darkness south of the 49th?
>>
>> That said I cannot begin to try to help anyone unless they learn how
>> to help themselves and that starts with picking up the phone retuning
>> calls and answering emails. N'est Pas Stevey Boy Harper?
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 02:17:23 -0300
>> Subject: Your tally of blogs about me to date dictates that maybe you
>> can inspire a war resister such as Corey Glass to contact me before
>> Harper gives him the boot.
>> To: danf@danf.net, pm@pm.gc.ca
>> Cc: irishmike02@yahoo.com, common_ills@yahoo.com, Dion.S@parl.gc.ca,
>> Bevilacqua.M@parl.gc.ca, vancouvercatholicworker@yahoo.
>>
>> Like you everybody thinks I am a nut excepting of course Stevey Boy
>> Harper and the dummy Dion. They just flat out hate me. Nest Pas?
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 15:21:10 -0400
Subject: Fwd: As the seasoned Librano lawyers Denis Paradis and Geoff
Regan dice with Yasmin Ratansi and Brucy Stanton for the Speaker's
cjair I should remind them of my lawsuit in Federal Court N'esy Pas
Trudeau "The Younger" ???
To: AriGoldkind@hotmail.com, vaughan.black@dal.ca, info@nickwright.ca,
info@animaljustice.ca, gwildgen@humanesociety.org,
hon.jane.philpott@canada.ca, minister_ministre@hc-sc.gc.ca,
Kent.Hehr@parl.gc.ca, DND_MND@forces.gc.ca, Amarjeet.Sohi@parl.gc.ca,
Patty.Hajdu@parl.gc.ca, "Bob.Paulson" <Bob.Paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
Maryam.Monsef@parl.gc.ca, Chrystia.Freeland@parl.gc.ca,
comments@cpac.ca, billmorton@mix97.com, Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca,
mcu@justice.gc.ca
Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, purtski@gmail.com,
mark.levitz@gov.bc.ca, MaryAnn4peace <maryann4peace@gmail.com>,
pep.philpott@cbc.ca, info@peicanada.com
Hey
Trust that I called a lot of people once again to register my indignation
before addressing some Green Meanie lawyers concerned about animal rights
instead of human rights or my rights under the Charter and sending this
email. You know who you are but some of the others work for these people
and I was not surprised at the many efforts of bureaucrats to play dumb
about my concerns. They have played the same games with me since 2002
http://www.cbc.ca/news/
That said this what a pervert who claims to work for Kent Hehr and Harjit
Singh Sajjan published about my daughters and I while they were busy
electing a buddy of theirs to be the new Speaker
https://baconfatreport.
David Amos!
by baconfatreport
https://baconfatreport.
2, 2015
Imagine if such things were published about your children. More importantly
why can't Trudeau "The Younger" defend his own reputation. Sections 300 and
319 of the Canadian Criminal Code are still on the books correct Bob
Paulson???
Yo Nick Wright I know what I have been sending you and you many Green
Meanie friends since 2004 and can easily prove in court. There is no need
to be redundant so I will send ya something new before the Speech from the
Throne today. In the "Mean" time say hey to the not so Honourable Lawrence
MacAulay and Jane PhilPott for me will ya?
http://healthycanadians.gc.ca/
http://pm.gc.ca/eng/minister-
http://www.agr.gc.ca/eng/
Remember mean old me NOW?
Me Myself and I and YOU talking to Stevey Boy Murphy on CTV in 2006
Now this was You and I politicking again this year Correct?
Everybody talks about you versus Chrystia Freeland et al but you
people don't get many views on Rogers TV
http://www.thestar.com/news/
Toronto University - Rosedale Federal Debate - 2015 Federal Election - The
Local Campaign, Rogers TV 96 views
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
On the other hand I get lots of views on Rogers TV and even CBC ignores
their mandate and faols to admit that I exist even though I have lawsuit in
Federal Court at the same time
Fundy Royal, New Brunswick Debate – Federal Elections 2015 - The Local
Campaign, Rogers TV 3,523 Views
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 10:04 AM
Subject: Re: As the seasoned Librano lawyers Denis Paradis and Geoff Regan
dice with Yasmin Ratansi and Brucy Stanton for the Speaker's cjair I should
remind them of my lawsuit in Federal Court N'esy Pas Trudeau "The Younger" ???
To: marie-eve.letourneau@gg.ca, "info@pco-bcp.gc.ca" <info@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, "
info@gg.ca" <info@gg.ca>, Karine Fortin <info@ndp.ca>, gopublic <
gopublic@cbc.ca>, whistleblower <whistleblower@ctv.ca>
Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Stephen.Wallace@gg.ca
http://opendatacanada.com/
*Stephen Wallace* works as Secretary to the Governor General (Secrétaire du
Gouverneur général) in Secretary's Office (Bureau du secrétaire), Office of
the Secretary to the Governor General (Bureau du secrétaire du gouverneur
général). The telephone number is *613-993-0259 <613-993-0259>*. The
address is *1 Sussex Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A1*.
*Stephen.Wallace@gg.ca <Stephen.Wallace@gg.ca>*
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: NDP/NPD <info@ndp.ca>
Date: Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 9:51 AM
Subject: Automatic reply: As the seasoned Librano lawyers Denis Paradis and
Geoff Regan dice with Yasmin Ratansi and Brucy Stanton for the Speaker's
cjair I should remind them of my lawsuit in Federal Court N'esy Pas Trudeau
"The Younger" ???
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
*Le français suit*
Friend,
Thanks for your email.
To help us respond to you in the fastest way possible, please submit your
question or comment using our contact tool at http://ndp.ca/contact
We’ll do our best to respond to you as quickly as possible.
Thanks again,
Canada's NDP
_______________________________________________________
300-279 Laurier West/Ouest Ottawa, ON K1P 5J9
(TÉL) 866.525.2555 | (TÉLÉC/FAX) 613.230.9950
ndp.ca | npd.ca
Cope 225:js
****
Bonjour,
Merci pour votre courriel.
Pour nous aider à vous répondre le plus rapidement possible, veuillez faire
parvenir votre question ou commentaire à l’adresse
http://npd.ca/contactez-vous.
Merci encore,
Le NPD du Canada
_______________________________________________________
300-279 Laurier West/Ouest Ottawa, ON K1P 5J9
(TÉL) 866.525.2555 | (TÉLÉC/FAX) 613.230.9950
ndp.ca | npd.ca
Cope 225:js
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 9:51 AM, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Speech from the Throne
>
> December 2, 2015
> Governor General to Deliver Speech from the Throne
>
> OTTAWA—His Excellency the Right Honourable David Johnston, Governor
> General of Canada, will open the first session of the 42nd Parliament of
> Canada with the Speech from the Throne. The event will take place on *Friday,
> December 4, 2015, at 2:30 p.m. *in the Senate Chamber, on Parliament
> Hill.
>
> The Speech from the Throne will be broadcast live on television and online
> at *http://parlvu.parl.gc.ca* <http://parlvu.parl.gc.ca/>. One of the
> governor general’s most important constitutional duties is to ensure that
> Canada always has a prime minister and a government in place that has the
> confidence of Parliament. As The Queen’s representative in Canada, the
> governor general summons, prorogues and dissolves Parliament, delivers the
> Speech from the Throne, and gives Royal Assent to acts of Parliament. For
> more information, visit *www.gg.ca* <http://www.gg.ca/>.
>
> -30-
>
> *Media information*:
>
> Marie-Ève Létourneau
> Rideau Hall Press Office
> 613-998-0287
> *marie-eve.letourneau@gg.ca <marie-eve.letourneau@gg.ca>*
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:37 PM
> Subject: As the seasoned Librano lawyers Denis Paradis and Geoff Regan
> dice with Yasmin Ratansi and Brucy Stanton for the Speaker's cjair I should
> remind them of my lawsuit in Federal Court N'esy Pas Trudeau "The Younger"
> ???
> To: Denis.Paradis@parl.gc.ca, Yasmin.Ratansi@parl.gc.ca,
> bruce.stanton@parl.gc.ca, Geoff Regan <geoff@geoffregan.ca>, Kim Seguin <
> geoff.regan@parl.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "justin.trudeau.a1" <
> justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>,
> stephen.harper@parl.gc.ca, "andrew.scheer" <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>,
> andrew <andrew@frankmagazine.ca>, Jacques Poitras <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>,
> nmoore <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>, newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, news <
> news@kingscorecord.com>, david <david@lutz.nb.ca>, "oldmaison@yahoo.com" <
> oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, Mad Ape <
> chiefape@gmail.com>, "john.green" <john.green@gnb.ca>, Barry Winters <
> sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, Arthur Topham <radical@radicalpress.com>,
> "Paul.Collister" <Paul.Collister@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, paul <paul@paulfromm.com>,
> "Paul.Lynch" <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>, "Leanne.Fitch" <
> Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>, "leanne.murray" <
> leanne.murray@mcinnescooper.
> roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>
>
>
> -
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/
> Live 42nd Parliament opens with election of new Commons SpeakerMPs set to
> vote for next Commons Speaker starting at 1 p.m. ET
>
> The Canadian Press Posted: Dec 03, 2015 10:07 AM ET
>
> The 42nd session of Parliament will begin today with a single event — the
> election of a new Speaker to preside over the House of Commons.
>
> - *COMING UP LIVE: MPs vote to choose next Speaker at 1 p.m. ET*
> - *New Parliament's 1st act will be to elect House of Commons Speaker
> <http://www.cbc.ca/news/
> - *BLOG | 200 new MPs pose a challenge for those covering Parliament
> Hill*
> <http://www.cbc.ca/news/
>
> Four candidates are vying for the position:
>
> - Liberal Denis Paradis.
> - Liberal Yasmin Ratansi.
> - Liberal Geoff Regan.
> - Conservative Bruce Stanton.
>
> In a majority government scenario, the Speaker usually comes from the
> ranks of the governing party: in this case, the Liberals. However the
> deputy Speaker is often from the Opposition ranks.
>
> The deputy and two other alternate Speakers (the three are officially
> named the chair, deputy chair and assistant deputy chair of the committees
> of the whole) will be named following Thursday's election.
>
> At various times, any of the four may be in the chair to preside over
> Commons debate.
>
> Ottawa-area MP Mauril Bélanger was expected to also be a candidate, but revealed
> on Monday that he has amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
> < http://www.cbc.ca/news/
> — ALS or Lou Gehrig's disease — and withdrew from the race.
>
> - *Robert-Falcon Ouellette ends bid for Speaker after controversial
> remarks
> <http://www.cbc.ca/news/
> - *Liberal MP Mauril Bélanger diagnosed with incurable
> Lou Gehrig's disease
> <http://www.cbc.ca/news/
> - *Rona Ambrose names previous Speaker Andrew Scheer as Conservative
> House leader
> <http://www.cbc.ca/news/
>
> Conservative MP Andrew Scheer, who held the post since 2011, isn't
> running again
> < http://www.cbc.ca/news/
> and will instead act as Opposition House leader.
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
> FrederictonDecember 2015T-1557-15DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE
> QUEEN
> (M-English)
> * Others - Crown (v. Queen) [Actions]*
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>
>
> * Court File No. T-1557-15*
>
> *FEDERAL COURT*
>
> *BETWEEN: *
> *DAVID RAYMOND AMOS*
> *
> Plaintiff*
> *and*
>
> *HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN*
> *
> Defendant*
>
> *STATEMENT OF CLAIM*
>
> *The Parties*
>
> 1. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN (Crown) is Elizabeth II, the Queen of
> England, the Protector of the Faith of the Church of England, the longest
> reigning monarch of the United Kingdom and one of the wealthiest persons in
> the world. Canada pays homage to the Queen because she remained the Head of
> State and the Chief Executive Officer of Canada after the *Canada Act
> 1982* *(U.K.) 1982, c. 11* came into force on April 17, 1982. The
> standing of the Queen in Canada was explained within the *2002* *Annual
> Report FORM 18-K* filed by Canada with the United States Securities and
> Exchange Commission (SEC). It states as follows:
>
> * “The executive power of the federal Government is vested in the
> Queen, represented by the Governor General, whose powers are exercised on
> the advice of the federal Cabinet, which is responsible to the House of
> Commons. The legislative branch at the federal level, Parliament, consists
> of the Crown, the Senate and the House of Commons.”*
>
> * “The executive power in each province is vested in the Lieutenant
> Governor, appointed by the Governor General on the advice of the federal
> Cabinet. The Lieutenant Governor’s powers are exercised on the advice of
> the provincial cabinet, which is responsible to the legislative assembly.
> Each provincial legislature is composed of a Lieutenant Governor and a
> legislative assembly made up of members elected for a period of
> five years.” *
>
> 2. Her Majesty the Queen is the named defendant pursuant to sections
> 23(1) and 36 of the *Crown Liability and Proceedings Act. *Some of the
> state actors whose duties and actions are at issue in this action are the
> Prime Minister, Premiers, Governor General, Lieutenant Governors, members
> of the Canadian Forces (CF), and Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP),
> federal and provincial Ministers of Public Safety, Ministers of Justice,
> Ministers of Finance, Speakers, Clerks, Sergeants-at-Arms and any other
> person acting as Aide-de-Camp providing security within and around the
> House of Commons, the legislative assemblies or acting as security for
> other federal, provincial and municipal properties.
>
> 3. Her Majesty the Queen’s servants the RCMP whose mandate is to
> serve and protect Canadian citizens and assist in the security of
> parliamentary properties and the protection of public officials should not
> deny a correspondence from a former Deputy Prime Minister who was appointed
> to be Canada’s first Minister of Public Safety in order to oversee the RCMP
> and their cohorts. The letter that helped to raise the ire of a fellow
> Canadian citizen who had never voted in his life to run for public office
> four times thus far is quoted as follows:
>
> * “Mr. David R. Amos
> Jan 3rd, 2004*
> 153Alvin Avenue
> * Milton, MA U.S.A. 02186*
>
> * Dear Mr. Amos*
>
> * Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to *
> * my predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding
> your safety. *
> * I apologize for the delay in responding.*
>
> * If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only*
> * suggest that you contact the police of local jurisdiction.
> In addition, any *
> * evidence of criminal activity should be brought to their
> attention since the *
> * police are in the best position to evaluate the
> information and take action *
> * as deemed appropriate. *
>
> * I trust that this information is satisfactory.*
>
> * Yours
> sincerely*
> *
> A. Anne McLellan”*
>
> 4. DAVID RAYMOND AMOS (Plaintiff), a Canadian Citizen and the first
> Chief of the Amos Clan, was born in Sackville, New Brunswick (NB) on July
> 17th, 1952.
>
> 5. The Plaintiff claims standing in this action as a citizen whose
> human rights and democratic interests are to be protected by due
> performance of the obligations of Canada’s public officials who are either
> elected or appointed and all servants of the Crown whose mandate is to
> secure the public safety, protect public interests and to uphold and
> enforce the rule of law. The Crown affirms his right to seek relief for
> offences to his rights under section 24(1) of the *Canadian Charter of
> Rights and Freedoms *(Charter). Paragraphs 6 to 13 explain the delay in
> bringing this action before Federal Court and paragraphs 25 to 88 explain
> this matter.
>
> 6. The Plaintiff states that pursuant to the democratic rights found
> in Section 3 of the Charter he was a candidate in the elections of the
> membership of the 38th and 39th Parliaments in the House of Commons and a
> candidate in the elections of the memberships of the legislative assemblies
> in Nova Scotia (NS) and NB in 2006.
>
> 7. The Plaintiff states that if he is successful in finding a
> Chartered Accountant to audit his records as per the rules of Elections
> Canada, he will attempt to become a candidate in the election of the
> membership of the 42nd Parliament.
>
> 8. The Plaintiff states that beginning in January of 2002, he made
> many members of the RCMP and many members of the corporate media including
> employees of a Crown Corporation, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
> (CBC) well aware of the reason why he planned to return to Canada and
> become a candidate in the next federal election. In May of 2004, all
> members seated in the 37th Parliament before the writ was dropped for the
> election of the 38th Parliament and several members of the legislative
> assemblies of NB and Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) knew the reason is the
> ongoing rampant public corruption. Evidence of the Plaintiff’s concerns can
> be found within his documents that the Office of the Governor General
> acknowledged were in its possession ten years ago before the Speech from
> the Throne in 2004. The Governor General’s letter is as follows:
>
> *
> “September 11th, 2004*
> * Dear Mr. Amos, *
>
> * On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne
> Clarkson, *
> * I acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and CD
> regarding corruption,*
> * one received from you directly, and the other forwarded to us
> by the Office of *
> * the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick. *
>
> * I regret to inform you that the Governor General
> cannot intervene in *
> * matters that are the responsibility of elected officials and
> courts of Justice of *
> * Canada. You already contacted the various provincial
> authorities regarding *
> * your concerns, and these were the appropriate steps to take.
> *
>
> * Yours
> sincerely. *
> * Renee
> Blanchet *
> * Office of
> the Secretary *
> * to the
> Governor General”*
>
> 9. The Plaintiff states that the documents contain proof that the
> Crown by way of the RCMP and the Minister of Public Safety/Deputy Prime
> Minister knew that he was the whistleblower offering his assistance to
> Maher Arar and his lawyers in the USA. The Governor General acknowledged
> his concerns about the subject of this complaint and affirmed that the
> proper provincial authorities were contacted but ignored the Plaintiff’s
> faxes and email to the RCMP and the Solicitor General in November of 2003
> and his tracked US Mail to the Solicitor General and the Commissioner of
> the RCMP by way of the Department of Foreign Affairs and International
> Trade (DFAIT) in December of 2003 and the response he received from the
> Minister of Public Safety/Deputy Prime Minister in early 2004. One document
> was irrefutable proof that there was no need whatsoever to create a
> Commission of Inquiry into Maher Arar concerns at about the same point in
> time. That document is a letter from the US Department of Homeland Security
> (DHS) Office Inspector General (OIG complaint no. C04-01448) admitting
> contact with his office on November 21, 2003 within days of the Plaintiff
> talking to the office of Canada’s Solicitor General while he met with the
> US Attorney General and one day after the former Attorney General of New
> York (NY) and the former General Counsel of the SEC testified at a public
> hearing before the US Senate Banking Committee about investigations of the
> mutual fund industry.
>
> 10. The Plaintiff states that another document that the Plaintiff
> received during the election of the 39th Parliament further supported the
> fact he was a whistleblower about financial crimes. In December of 2006 a
> member of the RCMP was ethical enough to admit that he understood the
> Plaintiff’s concerns and forwarded his response to the acting Commissioner
> of the RCMP and others including a NB Cabinet Minister Michael B. Murphy QC.
> The Crown is well aware that any member sitting in the last days of the 37
> th Parliament through to the end of the 41st Parliament could have stood
> in the House of Commons and asked the Speaker if the Crown was aware of the
> Plaintiff’s actions. All parliamentarians should have wondered why his
> concerns and that of Mr. Arar’s were not heard by a committee within the
> House of Commons in early 2004. Instead, the Crown created an expensive
> Commission to delay the Arar matter while he sued the governments of Canada
> and the USA and his wife ran in the election of the 38th Parliament. In
> 2007, Arar received a $10-million settlement from the Crown and the Prime
> Minister gave him an official apology yet the US government has never
> admitted fault. A month after the writ was dropped for the election of the
> 42nd Parliament and CBC is reporting Syrian concerns constantly, Mr.
> Arar’s lawyer announced that the RCMP will attempt to extradite a Syrian
> intelligence officer because it had laid a charge in absentia and a
> Canada-wide warrant and Interpol notice were issued. The Plaintiff
> considers such news to be politicking practiced by the Minister of Public
> Safety. He noticed the usually outspoken Mr. Arar made no comment but his
> politically active wife had lots to say on CBC. Meanwhile, the RCMP
> continues to bar a fellow citizen from parliamentary properties because he
> exercised the same democratic rights after he had offered his support to
> Arar by way of his American lawyers. The aforementioned letter about
> financial crimes was from the Inspector General for Tax Administration in
> the US Department of the Treasury. Mr Arar’s lawyers, the RCMP, the
> Canadian Revenue Agency and the US Internal Revenue Service still refuse to
> even admit TIGTA complaint no. 071-0512-0055-C exists. However, the
> Commissioner of Federal Court, the Queen’s Privy Council Office and other
> agencies were made well aware of it before the Speech from the Throne in
> 2006.
>
> 11. The Plaintiff states that from June 24, 2004 until the day he signed
> this complaint he has diligently tried to resolve the breach of his rights
> under the Charter that are the subject of this complaint with any public
> official in Canada whom he believed had the mandate or the ability to
> request that the Crown investigate and correct the malicious actions and
> inactions of the RCMP, Sergeants-at-Arms and Aides-de-Camp in all
> jurisdictions. Until June 16, 2006 the Plaintiff did not have irrefutable
> proof to support this complaint. Time did not permit him to address it
> immediately in Federal Court in 2006 because his slate was full. For
> instance on June 16, 2006 while dealing with deeply troubling private
> family matters, he was running against the Attorney General for his seat in
> the NS provincial election while arguing members of the RCMP about strange
> calls he got from someone in Ottawa who claimed the Department of Public
> Safety as her client, dealing with many liberal party members who were
> about to witness in Moncton NB the first debate of all those who wished to
> become their new leader, assisting a farmer in his attempt to get some
> authority to properly investigate the demise of his cattle and discussing
> with members of the Saint John NB City Council the actions of a sergeant in
> the Saint John Police Force who was calling friends of the Plaintiff and
> claiming that he was drug dealing member of a bike gang that they should
> stay away from while he was preparing to intervene in pipeline matter that
> was about to heard by the National Energy Board in Saint John .
>
> 12. The Plaintiff states that in April of 2007 he wrote a complaint
> about this matter and returned to the Capital District of NB in order to
> file it and argue the Crown before the Federal Court if it did not wish to
> settle. A clerk of this court informed him that his complaint was not
> composed correctly, so he began to rewrite this complaint. However, as soon
> as it was known what the Plaintiff was about to file he was subject to
> further police harassment and his family began to suffer from constant
> slander, sexual harassment and death threats on the Internet and on the
> telephone that continues to this very day while the RCMP, the FBI and many
> other law enforcement authorities continue to ignored the obvious evidence
> of cybercrime practiced against many people including his minor children.
>
> 13. The Plaintiff states that the Crown’s only response has been further
> harassment by the RCMP including false arrest and imprisonment and theft of
> his property by the Fredericton Police Force supported by other law
> enforcement authorities in Canada and the USA. The Governor General has had
> the Plaintiff’s documents for over ten years to study. The Crown now has
> one of the complaints that the RCMP has been delaying since 2003. It is as
> follows:
>
> *The Complaint*
>
> 14. The Plaintiff states that on June 24, 2004 during the election of
> the membership of the 38th Parliament the Crown breached his right to
> peaceful assembly and association under Section 2(c) and (d) of the
> Charter. The Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative Assembly of NB (a former
> member of the RCMP) supported by the Fredericton Police Force (FPF), the
> Corps of Commissionaires (COC) and at least one RCMP officer acting as
> Aide-de-Camp to the NB Lieutenant Governor barred the Plaintiff under
> threat of arrest from the legislative properties in NB.
>
> 15. The Plaintiff states that whereas the Crown refused to put anything
> in writing to either confirm or deny that he was in fact barred from the
> legislative properties in NB, he returned to the public property whenever
> he deemed it necessary to do so as he ran for public office three more
> times. For example, when the Plaintiff was a candidate in the election of
> the 39th Parliament for the riding of Fredericton, he was asked to come
> into the legislative building of NB to record a live interview for an
> Atlantic Television (ATV) news cast shortly before polling day. On that
> occasion, the Sergeant-at-Arms and his Aides-de-Camp did not attempt to bar
> the Plaintiff from access to legislative property quite possibly because
> they did not wish their actions to be recorded by ATV. However, the Crown
> made matters worse in short order. CBC barred the Plaintiff from an
> all-candidates’ debate on the University of New Brunswick (UNB) campus and
> on polling day two District Returning Officers on the UNB campus after
> viewing identification threatened to have the Plaintiff arrested stating
> that they did not believe he was on the ballot.
>
> 16. The Plaintiff states that the NB Sergeant-at-Arms continued with his
> threat of arrest after the election 39th Parliament. In response, the
> Plaintiff challenged the Sergeant-at-Arms to either put his threat in
> writing or arrest him so he could at least argue the Crown about the
> offences against his rights under the Charter.
>
> 17. The Plaintiff states that on June 16th, 2006 he was on a sidewalk on
> Queen Street in Fredericton NB waiting for a friend who was meeting with
> the Premier of NB and others inside the legislative assembly building.
> Within minutes of his arrival the Sergeant-at-Arms and two members of the
> FPF marched out of the building and served a signed document barring him
> from public places overseen by the Crown because some unnamed parties found
> him in *”Contempt of the House”.* The Sergeant-at-Arms then ordered the
> Plaintiff off legislative property. When the Plaintiff pointed out that he
> was not on legislative property but on a sidewalk on Queen Street, the
> Sergeant-at-Arms claimed that his jurisdiction extended to the middle of
> the street. The two members of the FPF identified themselves and agreed
> that if the Plaintiff did not cross the street they would arrest him.
>
> 18. The Plaintiff states that after he crossed Queen Street he took a
> photograph of the Sergeant-at-Arms and the FPF marching back into the
> building to prove date and time of their malice. He sent a photograph of
> their barring notice to many people particularly liberal party members
> gathering in Moncton, NB that day to hear a debate by those who wished to
> replace the former Prime Minister as their party leader. It was important
> to do so because a liberal mandate created the Charter in 1982 compelling
> all New Brunswickers including the Sergeant-at-Arms and the police to abide
> the law within Canada’s only bilingual province. Any citizen or public
> official who understands the Charter and received a copy of the barring
> notice should have noticed the Crown had barred a citizen from the
> legislative properties in NB in only one official language. No police
> officer or politician or Language Commissioner at either a federal or
> provincial level ever responded to any inquiry about that fact. The
> Sergeant-at-Arms of NB did acknowledge the receipt of a copy of his barring
> notice years later but he did so in French only.
>
> 19. The Plaintiff states that the NB Sergeant-at-Arms and his cohorts in
> the FPF, RCMP and the COC are well aware that as soon as the Plaintiff’s
> friend came out of legislative building on June 16, 2006, he was given the
> barring notice to take back inside in order to inquire about it and the
> reasons behind it. The COC are clearly named at the bottom of the document
> yet the Commissionaires and all the politicians he encountered that day
> claimed that they were not allowed to discuss the barring notice and never
> would ever since. The Plaintiff finds that the police, politicians and
> bureaucrats etc. are maintaining their oath to the Crown rather than uphold
> the law and Sections 2(c) (d), 16(2), 18(2) and 20(2) of the Charter and
> are relying on the Crown’s legal counsel to stop him from seeking relief
> *.*
>
> 20. The Plaintiff states that the RCMP and the members of the FPF who
> harassed the Plaintiff in September of 2006 while he was a candidate in the
> NB provincial election would not explain why the NB Sergeant-at-Arms and
> the COC had barred him with a document written in English only or why it
> was not published in the Royal Gazette. Members of the FPF who violated the
> Plaintiff’s privacy trying to read an email that he was composing on a
> laptop within his car parked on private property refused to explain why
> they thought they had the right do so as they attempted to interrogate him
> without a warrant or due process of law. Members of the FPF refused to take
> the same documents the RCMP had so that their major crimes unit could
> finally investigate after they demanded that the Plaintiff identify himself
> so they could check for warrants for his arrest. The FPF would not discuss
> what they would do if he returned to the UNB campus or if he parked a
> vehicle and put money in a parking meter on the side of Queen Street
> claimed by the Sergeant-at-Arms. In February of 2007 after a Cabinet
> Minister of NB acknowledged his concerns with the RCMP, his children took
> pictures of the Plaintiff standing on the legislative property and the
> Sergeant-at-Arms and the FPF did nothing that day. However, the police
> harassment got worse afterwards. The FPF tried to call him a criminal while
> the Plaintiff waited for answers before he argued the Crown in court about
> his property that the FPF had illegally seized. The text of two emails that
> the Crown and the FPF sent in 2007 are as follows:
>
> “
>
> *Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
From: "Murphy,
> Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca <MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca>
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>*
> * Subject:*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> * January 30, 2007 WITHOUT
> PREJUDICE Mr. David Amos Dear Mr.
> Amos: This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of
> your e-mail of December *
> * 29, 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
> Because of the *
> * nature of the allegations made in your message, I
> have taken the *
> * measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant
> Commissioner Steve Graham *
> * of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton
> . *
>
>
>
> * Sincerely, Honourable Michael B.
> Murphy Minister of Health”*
>
> * AND*
>
>
>
>
> * “From: “Lafleur, Lou” lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca
> < lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca> To:
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>,
> Subject: Fredericton Police Force Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007
> 15:21:13 -0300*
>
> * Dear Mr. Amos*
>
> * My Name is Lou LaFleur and I am a Detective with the
> Fredericton Police Major Crime Unit. I would like to talk to you regarding
> files that I am investigating and that you are alleged to have involvement
> in. *
>
> * Please call me at your earliest convenience and leave a
> message and a phone number on my secure and confidential line if I am not
> in my office.*
> * yours truly,*
>
>
>
>
>
> * Cpl. Lou LaFleur
> Fredericton Police Force 311 Queen
> St. Fredericton, NB
> 506-460-2332 <506-460-2332>*
>
> 21. The Plaintiff states that by September of 2007, he was told by
> police officers and others that he was barred from the town of Woodstock, the
> House of Commons, the National Capital District including Rideau Hall and
> the University of Ottawa, the Capital District of NB including the
> Lieutenant Governor’s residence and the University of NB, all other
> legislative properties in Canada and that a photograph of him was posted
> inside the NB legislative building, the Fredericton airport and at least
> one mining property guarded by the Corps of Commissionaires.
>
> 22. The Plaintiff states that on or about September 13, 2007 during a
> conversation with the office of the Speaker of the House of Commons he was
> referred to the Sergeant-at-Arms in order to find out if the Plaintiff was
> truly barred from the House of Commons and if he had been sent an answer to
> the documentation the Speaker and the government of Iceland received in May
> of 2006. The Sergeant-at-Arms was apparently well aware of his concerns
> because he said he knew the Plaintiff from a past life and quickly hung up
> the telephone. The Sergeant-at-Arms never did answer the Plaintiff and
> ignored all his contacts ever since.
>
> 23. The Plaintiff states that the odd response from Sergeant-at-Arms of
> the House of Commons caused him to research how they knew each other. The
> public record states that in June of 2005 the RCMP officer acting as
> Aide-de-Camp to the NB Lieutenant Governor retired and joined the House of
> Commons as Director of Security Operations. On September 1, 2006, he became
> the Sergeant-at-Arms of the House of Commons. Therefore, because of all
> three of his positions from June of 2004 to December of 2014, the
> Sergeant-at-Arms of the House of Commons must have agreed and seconded his
> fellow Sergeant-at-Arms in NB and his threats to arrest Plaintiff if he
> reappeared on parliamentary property.
>
> 24. The Plaintiff states that with regards to this complaint about being
> illegally barred from parliamentary properties, the most recent contact
> from the Crown was the three members of the RCMP who harassed the Plaintiff
> at 1:30 AM on December 16, 2014 not long after he had received an email
> from a former CSIS agent who is the current Sergeant-at-Arms of the
> legislative assembly of Alberta.
>
> *The Facts of this Matter*
>
> 25. The Plaintiff states that on June 24, 2004 within minutes of his
> being barred, the Sergeant-at-Arms, two members of the FPF and one
> Commissionaire witnessed him deliver a large number of documents to the
> attention of two lawyers in the office of the opposition next door. He
> suspects that the Sergeant-at-Arms read at least the cover letter when his
> documents were in his care because to support his right to bar a citizen in
> front two members of the FPF he falsely accused the Plaintiff of attempting
> to serve documents while in the legislative building.
>
> 26. The Plaintiff states that within the hour of being barred, the
> Plaintiff visited the headquarters of the FPF and attempted to meet with
> its Chief in order to discuss the false allegations and the threat of
> arrest. Whereas a Corporal denied access to his Chief, the Plaintiff
> contacted the City Solicitor of Fredericton because he knew him personally
> in younger days. After waiting one week for someone to get back to him, the
> Plaintiff visited the constituency office of the Premier and the law office
> of a former Premier of NB and gave them many documents with the same cover
> letter addressing his concern about being barred from the legislative
> properties amongst other issues. One month later the Attorney General of NB
> sent an answer similar to what the Deputy Prime Minister sent eight months
> earlier telling him to take up his concerns with the police and ignored the
> issue of a citizen being barred and threatened by the police. A lawyer
> acting as the NB Ombudsman did not wish deal with the government on his
> behalf suggested that the Plaintiff take up his concerns with the New
> Brunswick Police Commission (NBPC) and introduced them. The Plaintiff, his
> wife and a lawyer met with the NBPC. The NBPC acknowledged the complaint
> and asked the FPF to investigate their questionable actions. In the eleven
> years since the NBPC never responded and the Plaintiff knows why. The NBPC
> and Governor General have many of his documents and one is a letter to the
> Commissioner of the RCMP. The Plaintiff is well aware the Chair of the NBPC
> in 2004 was also the Chief Coroner whom he testified before on July 15,
> 1982 and he clearly informed the Crown he assisted in a successful civil
> lawsuit against the RCMP about a wrongful death.
>
> 27. The Plaintiff states that the Sergeant-at-Arms, two Commissionaires,
> a librarian, and two members of the FPF knew that the Plaintiff was in
> legislative assembly on June 24, 2004 looking for the “blogger” Charles
> Leblanc. While the Plaintiff was waiting for Charles Leblanc to arrive
> that day he exercised his democratic right to witness the proceedings of
> the Legislative Assembly from the gallery.
>
> 28. The Plaintiff states that apparently a friend of the Crown put a new
> spin on this matter the following day. The Crown’s corporate media has
> never said anything about the Crown’s malicious actions barring him it has
> had lots to say about the barring the blogger Charles Leblanc two years
> later and it has made the arrests and prosecutions of him well known. On
> June 25, 2004 Charles Leblanc a well-known friend of the MLAs, the
> Sergeant-at-Arms, the Commissionaires, the RCMP and the Fredericton Police
> Force falsely reported in the social media that the Plaintiff had been *“shown
> the door”* claiming that he had attempted to interrupt the proceedings in
> the Legislature by speaking from the gallery. The Crown knows if that were
> true it would have been recorded in the legislative records. The words of
> Charles Leblanc an important witness to be called to testify as to what he
> knows about this matter are as follows
>
>
>
> *“IS ELVY ROBICHAID SEEING THE LIGHT???? by Charles LeBlanc
> Friday, Jun. 25, 2004 at 10:56 AM Fredericton updates from
> Charles *
>
> * “There’s always undercovers cops around but only when the House is in
> session. As God as my witness I hope nothing happens but it’s just a
> matter of time till someone is push over the edge. I guess a guy name David
> Amos was shown the door yesterday at the Legislature. This guy is running
> as an Independent candidate in the riding of Fundy Royal. I met the guy
> over the net and he has a beef with our political bureaucrats. I admire
> people fighting for what they believe in but you can’t get carried away. I
> guess in this case? He wanted to speak from the Gallery and that’s a big
> faux pas!”*
>
> 29. The Plaintiff states that he was not surprised that for the benefit
> of his political opponents, servants of the Crown would practice such
> malice against a citizen seeking public office. Three weeks before the
> Plaintiff was barred in 2004 Elections Canada’s lawyers waited until the
> very last minute to admit that section 3 of the Charter existed and that
> it affirmed his right to run as an Independent.
>
> 30. The Plaintiff states that he has studied the actions of journalists,
> politicians and their lawyers for many years and has argued many. He has no
> doubt that during the time of a federal election the Crown would not have
> barred any member of a wealthy well known political party from any
> parliamentary property in Canada without dealing with a Charter argument in
> court and a host of journalists almost immediately. With that in mind the
> Plaintiff gathered the evidence to support this claim and waited until the
> CBC reported that the Prime Minister had asked the Governor General to drop
> a writ. Now history tells us all that the writ has been dropped early in
> order for the Prime Minister to cause the most expensive and one of the
> longest federal elections in the history of Canada on a date mandated by a
> law that his wealthy political party created for its benefit. Now that the
> stock markets are in a turmoil again the Office of the Inspector General of
> the SEC is acknowledging the Plaintiff’s emails but only after they were
> made aware that he received an ethical answer from a global organization
> that oversees auditors. Recent events have proven to the Plaintiff that it
> is important that he file this action in Federal Court as soon as possible
> in order see if the Harer government wishes to continue barring him from
> parliamentary property before polling day.
>
> 31. The Plaintiff states that during the election of the 38th Parliament
> not one of the employees of the CBC denied the fact that it had acted in a
> deliberate partisan fashion and ignored the Crown Corporation’s mandate.
> CBC reported that there were five candidates on the ballot in Fundy but
> failed to name the Plaintiff in their website or on the television and the
> radio. Nothing surprised the Plaintiff about the actions of the CBC but
> they should not have laughed at him when he pointed out other citizens
> should be afforded equal opportunity to hear of him.
>
> 32. The Plaintiff states that many politicians knew that the CBC had
> hard copy of two lawsuits of his since 2002 and their journalists had been
> laughing at him for two years. It was a profound mistake for CBC to ignore
> his candidacy now that he did as he promised in a statement of one
> lawsuit and was running for public office in Canada. As CBC continued
> serving the interests of the politicians who provided the funding sourced
> from the Canadian taxpayer other citizens noticed that the CBC was ignoring
> his candidacy. One journalist who had laughed at him called back and tried
> to make a deal after the Plaintiff had called the Ombudsman for CBC
> complaining of him and his associates only to be laughed at some more and
> invited to sue CBC. CBC continued to ignore the Plaintiff even though the
> popular former CBC reporter Mike Duffy was now employed by their largest
> corporate competitor, CTV and they claimed Fundy was a riding to watch and
> at least three newspapers and even the CBC’s blogger friend Charles Leblanc
> had chosen to put his strange spin the actions and words of the Plaintiff
> while calling him a Hells Angel. However, the aforementioned CBC journalist
> did not keep his job very long after his boss and three directors of CBC
> received the very same documents and CD that the Plaintiff’s political
> opponents had in their possession. (The former CBC journalist did get a job
> with the government of NB and has continued with his obvious malice ever
> since)
>
> 33. The Plaintiff states that the CBC would not have ignored its mandate
> and the standing of a candidate if he or she were a member of the Liberal
> Party or the newly merged Conservative parties or the Bloc Quebecois Party
> or the Green Party or the New Democratic Party without expecting to deal
> with legions of lawyers. CBC had no legal right whatsoever to ignore the
> Plaintiff merely because he was an Independent. In fact the mandate of CBC
> as a publicly owned broadcaster dictates that he must not be ignored
> whether he be a member of a powerful political party or not. With regards
> to this complaint, on June 24, 2004 there were many journalists inside the
> legislative properties of NB not just CBC. They published nothing about the
> Plaintiff of his running for public office or his being barred or even
> after their blogger friend, Charles Leblanc certainly did.
>
> 34. The Plaintiff states that in June of 2006 Charles Leblanc was also
> barred from the same legislative properties but not the Public Documents
> Building on the UNB campus. More importantly the Sergeant-at-Arms was
> clever enough not to sign or date the English only document this time. Thus
> Charles Leblanc who usually demands things in French from the government
> when he is in trouble was never barred at all. The CBC immediately reported
> the barring of Charles Leblanc falsely claiming that the Sergeant-at-Arms
> had signed the Barring Notice. CBC wrote the Sergeant-at-Arms admitted that
> he had barred about six others but did not disclose as to who they were.
> CBC did not ask who who the other citizens were because they knew they
> would have to name the Plaintiff as well. Many people have protested the
> barring of Charles Leblanc and a petition to have it revoked was placed in
> the public record of the legislative assembly to no avail. In 2006 Charles
> Leblanc was arrested in Saint John and in 2011 in Fredericton. In 2009 and
> 2012 the FPF arrested their blogging friend Charles Leblanc on the
> legislative properties. The CBC reported each time but failed to follow up
> and investigate and report why the Crown refused to charge Charles Leblanc
> in both instances. The CBC knows that as soon as the Plaintiff contacted
> the politicians and police to remind them that he would appreciate being
> called to testify at Charles Leblanc’s trial as a hostile but ethical
> witness about the barring actions of the Crown it would never go forward
> with the charges. Leblanc was arrested by the FPF two other times in recent
> years and he is on trial right now. The CBC knows the Plaintiff has
> talked to members of the RCMP, the FPF, the Saint John Police Force, the
> Miramichi Police Force and the Edmundston Police Force who were
> investigating Leblanc for various reasons since 2006. The police usually
> denied knowing who the Plaintiff was as they refused to answer his emails. The
> Plaintiff knows the reason why Charles Leblanc was barred from legislative
> property. He agrees with the Crown doing so but it failed to allow the
> nasty blogger the right to due process of law just like it did with and
> several others. He has never understood why the Crown has not charged
> Leblanc under sections 300 and 319 of the *Criminal Code *in lieu of
> arresting him for protesting too loudly or possible child porn or trespass
> or punching an equally nasty poetic beggar.
>
> 35. The Plaintiff states that by the end of November of 2004 a lawyer in
> the employ of the Attorney General of NB had answered him in writing and
> the FPF, two lawyers, the Mayor and a city councilor of Fredericton had
> some very serious email exchanges with the Plaintiff. The only responses
> to the Plaintiff about the breach of his right to peaceful assembly came
> from the (NBPC) on September 14, 2004 acknowledging his complaint (File no
> 2110-04-11) and two letters byway of email from the FPF. On September 30,
> 2004 a Staff Sergeant of the FPF wrote that he was in possession of the
> complaint and requested evidence to support the Plaintiff’s statement that
> he had been barred from the legislative properties for “*political
> reasons not legal reasons”* The Plaintiff responded and suggested that
> the FPF listen to the tape of the interview he had with the NBPC and study
> all the evidence he gave to the NBPC in the presence of a lawyer as a
> witness. The Staff Sergeant responded on October 29, 2004 stating that he
> had detailed reports from fellow members of the FPF and he had interviewed
> the Sergeant-at-Arms. He claimed that his fellow police officers acted
> appropriately and he would inform the Chief of the FPF that he did not have
> sufficient cause under the *Police Act* to investigate the complaint the
> Plaintiff registered with the NBPC against the FPF. The Plaintiff pointed
> out that the conflict of interest but grateful the FPF acknowledged the
> incident. The Mayor of Fredericton found no humour in that fact and sent
> the Plaintiff many emails within minutes no doubt in an effort to overload
> his email account. In 2003 the Plaintiff had demanded the Crown investigate
> the actions of RCMP now the RCMP should do the same with the Crown because
> that para-military police force has jurisdiction everywhere in Canada
> including all public and private property controlled by the Crown even
> military bases. The words of the Sergeant-at-Arms, Commissionaires and
> police were witnessed by only the Plaintiff. A legal action about their
> offences against his rights under the Charter would boil down to their word
> against his. Evidence was required because he was outnumbered and attacked
> by people the Crown employed to understand the law. It was doubtful they
> would act ethically and until June 16, 2006 the Crown refused to put
> anything in writing to prove this claim about the fact that the Plaintiff
> is barred from parliamentary properties.
>
> 36. The Plaintiff states that the Crown is aware that far greater
> offences have been practiced within the Capital District of NB by the FPF
> and the RCMP against the Plaintiff. Many servants of the Crown have
> challenged him to seek relief in a Canadian provincial court. The Plaintiff
> will not oblige Crown attorneys of thier desires he will file in a court of
> a country at a time he chooses. Time is on the Plaintiff’s side even though
> he getting old and was finally allowed to collect his Canada Pension. His
> children and grandchildren are still very young. Whatever was done against
> the Plaintiff was done against his Clan as well. All of the Plaintiff’s
> heirs are Canadian citizens and two of them are American citizens as well.
> The Crown, INTERPOL and the American law enforcement authorities cannot
> deny that there is no statute of limitations on certain crimes. The problem
> the Plaintiff is finding an ethical journalist to report about the legal
> actions that he and the Crown have already been involved in since 1982.
>
> 37. The Plaintiff states that in October of 2004 if the Staff Sergeant
> of the FPF had listened to the tape of his interview with the NBPC and
> studied the documents they have in their possession he would not have been
> so quick to dismiss the Plaintiff and his concerns in such a fashion. Their
> many lawyers hardly ever allow corrupt police officers to admit that the
> Plaintiff exists or put their malice towards him in writing. The Plaintiff
> had explained to the NBPC what transpired on June 24th, 2004. To explain
> briefly the police should have known instantly the Sergeant-at-Arms actions
> were for political reasons as soon as he turned in the guest pass and
> picked up his documents as he stepped outside the building. While the
> Plaintiff was inside the legislative building he spoke to only three
> employees two Commissionaires and the librarian. He did not interfere with
> the proceedings in the House as he watched the MLAs and their assistants
> from the gallery, some of whom he knew personally. He did notice political
> pundits in the building. One Cabinet Minister’s assistant had been
> following him for a couple of days. His political foes wanted him off the
> property immediately but they knew that he was not shy of litigation if the
> Crown attempted to place a malicious charge against him. Therefore they
> elected the Sergeant-at-Arms to try bully the Plaintiff.
>
> 38. The Plaintiff states that he satisfied himself as to the reasons
> behind the blatant malice once he asked Sergeant-at-Arms and the police
> three questions as follows:
>
> (1) The Plaintiff first asked was why he was being barred from the
> legislative property. The Sergeant-at-Arms falsely claimed in front of the
> police that the Plaintiff had tried to serve documents on somebody inside
> the parliamentary building. The Commissionaires and police knew that was
> untrue because they all witnessed the fact that the Plaintiff had left all
> the documents in his possession with the Commissionaire at the entrance
> before he was allowed into the building and they all watched him pick up
> the same documents as he turned in a visitor’s pass after he was asked to
> step outside of the building.
>
> *(2) *The second question was to the police to see if they agreed to
> the false claim of the Sergeant-at-Arms and if they would identify
> themselves. After the Sergeant-at-Arms said something quickly in French and
> both police officers stated that they agreed with him but only one would
> state his name and rank.
>
> *(3) *The Plaintiff then asked the Sergeant-at-Arms and the police if
> they thought they had jurisdiction over him. They all said yes but refused
> to take any documents from the Plaintiff just as the Deputy Prime Minister
> suggested.
>
> 39. The Plaintiff states that three people who were mentioned during the
> aforesaid meeting with the NBPC were Charles Leblanc, Byron Prior and the
> most wanted American gangster Whitey Bulger. All three were well aware of
> the Plaintiff and his actions. More importantly the NBPC were made well
> aware of the RCMP’s knowledge of his possession of many American police
> surveillance wiretap tapes. The NBPC were shown the very same tapes that he
> had promised to give to the Suffolk County District Attorney in the
> Dorchester District Court of Boston Massachusetts before a hearing to
> discuss an illegal summons to answer a malicious unsigned criminal
> complaint (Docket no. 0407CR004623). When the Plaintiff did so he was
> falsely imprisoned under the charges of *“other”.*
>
> 40. The Plaintiff states that an NBPC Commissioner did ask if they
> should take the original wiretap tapes. The Plaintiff said no and that the
> RCMP already had some but the NBPC could make copies of the ones before
> them. The NBPC declined and said they did not have jurisdiction over the
> RCMP and that they only wished to investigate why the FPF had threatened to
> arrest him on June 24th, 2004.
>
> 41. The Plaintiff states that read a few legal actions involving the
> NBPC. He truly believes that NBPC has a mandate to oversee the actions of
> the RCMP in the employ of municipalities and the government of NB. On April
> 12, 2013 an employee denied that the NBPC it has any concerns with the
> RCMP, so he forwarded the NBPC a judgment with an important statement.
> Whenever he called the NBPC afterwards she did not allow him to speak to
> anyone and denied receiving any emails even though several were published
> on the Internet. The judgment pertains to *Miramichi Agricultural
> Exhibition Association Ltd. v. Chatham (Town) 1995 CanLII 3862 (NB QB). *The
> statement reads as follows:
>
> “*Section 20* of the *Police Act authorizes the Police Commission to
> assess the adequacy of each police force and the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police and determine whether each municipality and the Province is
> discharging its responsibility for the maintenance of an adequate level of
> policing.”*
>
> 42. The Plaintiff states that in 2014 a confidential letter from the
> lawyer who is now the chair of the NBPC was published by Charles Leblanc.
> Within the aforesaid letter by a lawyer who was an officer in the Canadian
> Forces when the Plaintiff was illegally barred in 2004 explained why he and
> some other unnamed lawyers claimed that the Chief of the FPF and the NBPC
> did not have jurisdiction over the legislative properties in order to
> investigate the wrongs of the members of FPF under the *Police Act*. The
> lawyers claimed that whereas the police were acting under the orders of the
> Sergeant-at-Arms the immunity afforded them by parliamentary privilege
> would be undermined if the Chief of the FPF and the NBPC upheld the law and
> the Charter.
>
> 43. The Plaintiff states that as soon as he read the aforesaid letter he
> had a deeper understanding as to why the NBPC and the FPF had ignored his
> concerns for ten years and have refused to answer hard copy or an email or
> even come to the phone or return a call for ten years. He did manage to
> talk the lawyer who wrote the letter. The lawyer just like another lawyer
> who was the Chair of the NBPC since 2004 was offended that the Plaintiff
> would dare to call his law office instead of the NBPC. They both knew the
> reason was because every time he called the NBPC, the Commissioners and
> their executive directors were never available. They definitely did not
> return calls or answer emails from the Plaintiff. The assistant who had
> denied receiving any emails during his last conversation with her in May of
> 2015 said that NBPC was never going to talk to him again. It appears the
> NBPC believe that parliamentary privileges extend to them as well. Whether
> or not that is true the NBPC must agree that the RCMP have no civilian
> oversight whatsoever and that it is the only police force that has
> jurisdiction to investigate the actions of the Crown on parliamentary
> properties, the Canadian Forces and their semi-retired cohorts within the
> Corps of Commissionaires. It appears to the Plaintiff that the NBPC will
> not investigate the RCMP and in return the RCMP will not investigate them.
> However, they do report to the Crown and the Crown answers to the citizens
> it purportedly serves and protects.
>
> 44. The Plaintiff states that claimed parliamentary privileges of public
> officials are not above the rule of law just because some unnamed lawyers
> deem it to be so. Some of the privileges parliamentarians lay claim to
> cannot be found in the Constitution or any other Act. They are implied by
> longstanding parliamentary traditions and seldom challenged in a court of
> law.
>
> 45. The Plaintiff states that claimed parliamentary privileges must not
> be exercised secretly by the Crown against a citizen of an open and just
> democracy because he visited parliamentary properties while exercising his
> rights under the Charter and attempting to unseat its political friends. He
> vividly recalls the last encounter with the Sergeant-at-Arms that caused
> the Crown to create a *“Barring Notice”.*
>
> 46. The Plaintiff states that on or about March 24th, 2006 he went to
> the Office of the Conflict of Interest Commissioner of NB to give him the
> same documents he had promised the Commissioner of Federal Judicial
> Affairs, the Clerk of the Privy Council, Independent MP Andre Arthur,
> Independent MLA Tanker O’Malley and many others. The Commissionaire
> guarding door would not allow him in the building or take the documents.
> The Sergeant-at-Arms must have been notified because he was soon to appear
> and threatened to have the Plaintiff arrested again. He asked why this
> time. The Sergeant-at-Arms said he had already been warned to stay off
> legislative property. The Plaintiff pointed out the fact that he was not on
> the legislative property across the street but if the Crown wished to press
> false charges against him the police should be called then he would look
> forward to arguing the Sergeant-at-Arms in a court of law. The
> Sergeant-at-Arms claimed that they were standing on parliamentary property
> but did not call the police.
>
> 47. The Plaintiff states that he then informed the Sergeant-at-Arms if
> he thought he had a legal right to bar a citizen from parliamentary
> properties he should have the Crown put the reasons to do so in writing
> just like the NBPC had demanded of him when he complained of the
> Sergeant-at-Arms and the FPF about their malevolent actions against him two
> years before. There was no response from the Sergeant-at-Arms to that
> simple statement.
>
> 48. The Plaintiff states that he then asked the Sergeant-at-Arms in
> front of witnesses if he still thought he had jurisdiction over him on King
> Street and the response was yes. So the Plaintiff gave him the documents
> and a CD destined for the Conflict of Interest Commissioner and demanded an
> answer in writing. The Sergeant-at-Arms took the documents but refused to
> sign a receipt for them. He tried to take picture but the Sergeant-at-Arms
> crossed King Street and around the corner too quickly. The Plaintiff
> received no answer from Conflict of Interest Commissioner about his
> concerns. He called and emailed a copy of the cover letter to the
> Commissioner’s office to see if it received his documents and was ignored.
> The Commissionaire watching that day knows who took the documents.
>
> 49. The Plaintiff states that whereas there was no federal oversight of
> the securities exchange business and no civilian oversight of the RCMP, he
> took his concerns to the highest officials of each province who represented
> their governments and the Crown. By the end of July in 2005, he emailed and
> called the offices of the Premiers and Lieutenant Governors eight
> provinces. The Premier of Alberta did speak to the Plaintiff after he
> staged a parade on Wall Street in order to promote his province and that
> conversation did not go well. In early August 2005 he met the Alberta
> Premier’s challenge and included all provinces in their argument. The
> Premiers and Lieutenant Governors received by way of their Attorney General
> hard copy of many documents and a CD similar to those acknowledged by the
> Governor General and the Lieutenant Governors of NB and NL in 2004. They
> were sent by registered US mail (signature required). Since that time not
> one Lieutenant Governor, Attorney General or Premier has responded to the
> Plaintiff other than the occasional insulting email. Over the past ten
> years the offices of the Attorney Generals for Nova Scotia, Manitoba,
> Saskatchewan, Alberta, British Columbia and Newfoundland admitted on the
> telephone that his documents are in their files. However, not one would
> person was willing to explain why and who had determined his communication
> and evidence did not deserve an answer. The offices of the Attorney
> Generals for Canada, Ontario, Quebec and Prince Edward Island denied having
> anything from the Plaintiff. Those offices could not explain how registered
> mail sent signature required to their boss could get lost. Ten years later
> several provinces are attempting to join with the other provinces to
> oversee the securities exchange business through one corporation. The Crown
> must admit that corruption can be the only reason why all the Attorney
> Generals in Canada would continue to ignore a Canadian whistleblower’s
> documents that employees and Inspector Generals of the US Treasury Dept.
> and agents of the Crown in the United Kingdom have acknowledged beginning
> in January of 2002. All of the Attorney Generals of Canada should have
> noticed that the Plaintiff was capable of creating and arguing lawsuits
> against the Attorney General of Massachusetts and embarrassing the US
> Attorney when he attempted to make the complaints illegally evaporate *“Ex
> Parte”. *This complaint proves this statement is true.
>
> 50. The Plaintiff states that he has had many conversations with many
> Canadian law enforcement authorities etc. about his documentation etc. and
> he was usually the one to make first contact. However, in 2008 he was
> rather surprised when the office of the Auditor General of Canada called
> him on their own accord not long after he had received a response from the
> Commission of Public Sector Integrity to a complaint he made in 2007. The
> person who called was very elusive about the reason the Auditor General was
> contacting him but he gathered from the brief conversation someone was
> talking to the Commission of Public Sector Integrity. So he called the
> lawyer who just sent him the very strange response to see if she had
> changed her mind. She recognized the Plaintiff voice even though it had
> been six months since they had talked and asked him to hold the line. Thus
> the Plaintiff surmised she was expecting his call. Apparently she was
> because the Plaintiff was surprised once again when a man who would not
> identify himself came on the line claiming to be corporate security and
> threatened to have him arrested if the Plaintiff ever called their
> Commission again. The Plaintiff was not surprised to hear in late 2010 that
> the Auditor General had been auditing the Commission of Public Sector
> Integrity. The Plaintiff contacted the person in charge of the Freedom of
> Information to see if the Auditor General had his complaint. He was not
> surprised to see the Office of Auditor General claim that they did not have
> his file. What surprised him was the fact that Auditor General dared to
> deny it in writing.
>
> 51. The Plaintiff states that the Crown is well aware that the last
> responses that he received from the Office of the Auditor General, the
> Privy Council Office, the Commission of Public Complaints Against the RCMP,
> the Commission of Public Sector Integrity and actions of the RCMP against
> the Plaintiff in 2014 and 2015 have caused him quit looking for ethical
> conduct to come from anyone employed in the public service of Canada. In
> March of 2015 byway of an ethical lawyer in British Columbia the Plaintiff,
> the Commissioner of the RCMP and his legal department that whereas the RCMP
> has refused to investigate itself then it should at least stop harassing
> his family and wait to this lawsuit and his next one.
>
> 52. The Plaintiff states that from July of 1982 until July of 2008 the
> wrongful actions of the Crown and its cohorts against him were usually
> covert and very difficult to prove because it typically involved the word
> of the several police officers against his alone. The Crown should have
> noticed that amongst the documents that the Plaintiff provided it in 2004
> there are two documents from the Attorney General of NY. One document was
> labeled *“Re corruption”* (reference no. 04/000233). The Plaintiff
> forwarded the Attorney General of Canada amongst others emails containing
> his recent communications in 2015 with the Attorney General of NY about
> that file. The Crown should be aware that the Attorney General of NY in
> 2004 became the Governor of NY and that he was arrested by the FBI in 2008
> while he was outside of his jurisdiction in the US Capital but never
> prosecuted for any offence. The RCMP falsely arrested the Plaintiff when he
> returned to the Capital District of NB shortly afterwards. The RCMP
> practiced their wrongs on private property without a warrant or due process
> of law and never placed any charges against the Plaintiff as well. The
> downturn of the stock market in NY within months of both arrests caused a
> major worldwide recession. On October 8, 2008 the Plaintiff finally
> received an answer from the Prime Minister of Iceland whose Canadian
> Ambassador received exactly the same documents the Speaker in the House of
> Commons received in May of 2006 that his Sergeant-At- Arms refused to
> answer. In December of 2008 Bernie Madoff was arrested by the FBI in NY and
> by March of 2008 the US Attorney in NY and the SEC in Washington admitted
> in writing that the Plaintiff was involved in the Madoff matter and that
> his documents had been filed under seal and against the Plaintiff’s wishes.
> On September 8, 2015, the Office of the Inspector General of the SEC sent
> the Plaintiff and email suggesting that the Plaintiff file a new complaint
> within their website. The Plaintiff was quick to inform the SEC and many
> law enforcement authorities in Canada of his indignation as the news broke
> about the possible criminal actions of KPMG, the very auditors he was
> complaining of with regards to his family’s interests and the Madoff
> matter. The Plaintiff as usual has been ignored as of this date. However
> the Plaintiff has noticed a sudden upturn in visits to websites where his
> words and work are published. It is no coincidence.
>
> 53. The Plaintiff states that the Crown cannot deny that the Arar matter
> proved that the Canadian and American law enforcement authorities have had
> an agreement to share their questionable information and that Canadians do
> suffer from their unconfirmed suspicions. The very same law enforcement
> authorities attacked a whistleblower when he gave them irrefutable evidence
> to cause an investigation of their wrongs. A recent judgment of the Supreme
> Court of Canada (SCC), *Wakeling v United States of America*, *2014 SCC
> 72,* allows the RCMP to share their surveillance wiretap tapes of
> Canadian citizens with Americans. However, the RCMP and the FBI etc. do not
> wish to deal with American wiretap tapes of a mob that definitely practices
> its crimes across many borders. The lawyer working for the Plaintiff’s wife
> in a sincere effort to see justice served sent several of the original
> wiretap tapes to a US Senator who was a chair of the US Judiciary Committee
> after polling day for the election of the 39th Parliament. The lawyer did
> so on or about day the Governor General witnessed the first Conservative
> Cabinet Ministers of the current Canadian government swear an oath to the
> Crown. The Plaintiff sent proof of this statement to many members of the 39
> th Parliament before a confidence vote on its first budget. An opposition
> member acknowledged it but ignored it and only answered in a fashion that
> his opinions about sending the Canadian Forces into combat agreed with the
> Plaintiff’s.
>
> 54. The Plaintiff states that the Crown is well aware that until July 15
> th, 1982 the Plaintiff held a great respect for her servants in the RCMP.
> The Crown cannot deny that he explained the reasons for his change of mind
> with regards to the RCMP in his communications to the Commissioner of the
> RCMP, the FBI, the US Treasury Department and the Canadian Department of
> Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) amongst many others byway
> of fax and certified US Mail in November and December of 2003. As the
> Plaintiff stated in paragraph 3 his ire was raised when the Deputy Prime
> Minister chose to acknowledge his concerns only after he received
> acknowledgment of a complaint on file with the US Department of Homeland
> Security.
>
> 55. The Plaintiff states that he knew in September of 2004 that the
> Crown and the Americans were never going to uphold the law in regards to
> his concerns as he saw his tracked US Mail to DFAIT being forwarded
> elsewhere and his tracked mail to the RCMP evaporated from the Canada Post
> records. Furthermore his home phone line was cut right after Byron Prior
> notified him he was being much harassed and his American lawyer Barry
> Bachrach called to say that recent actions of the FBI and others had
> frightened him and that for the benefit of his family he was staying away
> from the Plaintiff and not going to court with on October 1, 2004. The
> Plaintiff expecting foul play prepared his wife to notify his Septs who
> held his Durable Power of Attorney and to visit Josie Maguire, the same
> person in the Canadian Consulate in Boston whom he sent his documents to on
> December 16, 2003. On October 1, 2004 a judge acted ethically and recused
> himself after witnessing the Plaintiff sign an affidavit and file it in the
> docket of the court along with hundreds of supporting documents proving the
> malicious prosecution by a layman clerk with no mandate to create a
> criminal prosecution. On September 3, 2003, the Plaintiff gave the police
> surveillance wiretap tapes that he had shown to the NBPC to the Suffolk
> County District Attorney before he stood before a sub municipal court to
> demand that it prove jurisdiction to hear a criminal prosecution involving
> a prison term and what right did a clerk have to summon a Canadian citizen
> across an international border to answer unknown criminal charges after the
> Boston Police would not discuss anything with him and the District Attorney
> claimed in writing that they were not involved in the matter. The court
> then changed its plan and he was called before another judge who read the
> affidavit and immediately sent the Plaintiff to jail held under the charges
> of *“other”* in solitary confinement with no chance of bail. The actions
> of the Plaintiff’s wife in Boston and his Septs in Canada caused a member
> of the RCMP and Josie Maguire to meet with him inside the American jail to
> advise him that they could not help him and because he must obey the laws
> of other countries he visits and then gave him an amazing document signed
> by a judge that had been faxed to them by the very clerk who had him
> falsely imprisoned.
>
> 56. The Plaintiff states that in response he thanked the Crown’s
> representatives in the USA for the proof of malice and showed them a faxed
> copy of the letter from the Governor General dated September 11, 2004 that
> he had received just before his home phone line was cut. He informed them
> that perhaps the Crown should expect a few lawsuits against it in Canada
> and the USA then dismissed them.
>
> 57. The Plaintiff states that the Crown and the Americans have always
> demanded that the Plaintiff keep his interactions in confidence with the
> RCMP, the FBI, the US Treasury Dept. and other secretive law enforcement
> authorities. The Plaintiff as a whistleblower about financial crimes proved
> that he did keep his concerns with the federal agents in Canada and the USA
> in confidence until Canada Day 2002 when he began filing his exhibits
> supporting two lawsuits in an American court. He continued to keep in
> confidence with the FBI the fact that he was in possession of hundreds of
> police surveillance wiretap tapes until April 1, 2003 when the US Secret
> Service and the Milton Police Department appeared at his door in the middle
> of the night with false allegations of a presidential threat and
> threatening extraordinary rendition because the Plaintiff was a foreign
> national just like Maher Arar. The Plaintiff called the RCMP headquarters
> the following day to inquire if they were informed about the visit the
> night before by the Secret Service. Some lady who claimed she was a lawyer
> said the RCMP knew all about the Plaintiff. She hung the phone when she was
> asked if the RCMP had listened to the police surveillance wiretap tapes he
> had given to the FBI. The conversation with the RCMP lawyer caused the
> Plaintiff to begin sharing a true copy of only one wiretap tape with
> hundreds of members of the bar and other law enforcement authorities in
> Canada and the USA. He has received an incredible number of incompetent
> responses. He only sent a few of the responses with the Crown thus far.
> There are many more.
>
> 58. The Plaintiff states that it is important to inform the Federal
> Court what is on the CD that the Governor General’s office acknowledged
> having two copies of in paragraph 8. It is a true copy of an American
> police surveillance wiretap tape.
>
> 59. The Plaintiff states that in his opinion he sees no harm in it being
> heard in public in Federal Court. He published copies of it in two American
> Internet domains in 2008 after the RCMP falsely arrested him and attempted
> to have him certified as mentally ill. The actions of the RCMP caused the
> Crown to have the problem the American’s have had since 2004 when they
> tried the same malicious trick rather than uphold the law. The problem is
> that the Plaintiff’s health has no bearing on irrefutable hard evidence. He
> should not be in possession of police surveillance wiretap tapes that
> offend the civil rights of many American citizens. With regards to this
> complaint about being illegally barred from parliamentary properties, the
> plaintiff must point out that the Commissioner of the RCMP and the Minister
> of Public Safety knew of the American police surveillance wiretap tapes in
> 2003. Furthermore in 2004 the RCMP and a catholic priest had several
> original wiretap tapes and the FPF, the NBPC, many members of the bar and
> public officials received a true copy of CDs the Governor General
> acknowledged before the Plaintiff was falsely imprisoned in the USA. The
> aforesaid problem is getting worse because every day more people around the
> world are aware of the wiretap tapes and two of the tapes have been
> downloaded a number of times by unknown parties. The Plaintiff cannot take
> them back even if he wanted to. The public has always taken far more
> interest about what is recorded on the wiretap tapes than his
> whistleblowing efforts about financial crimes but that could change
> anytime. Sooner or later someone will recognize who the people recorded on
> the tapes are and it may generate many lawsuits in the USA without
> involving the Plaintiff but has many more he has yet to reveal. The
> Plaintiff still has a number of wiretap tapes in his possession and several
> were stolen by the FPF along with his motorcycle. Other tapes are scattered
> about in Canada and the USA with people he trusts far more than any member
> of the RCMP or the FBI. Others tapes are hidden. Many of the wiretap tapes
> were no longer in the Plaintiff’s possession for over ten years. He made
> certain no one gave him any idea as to where most of the wiretap tapes are
> hidden but he secured the proof of the wiretap tapes he had given to the
> RCMP and various law enforcement authorities placed in the public record of
> American courts and that his former lawyer sent to a US Senator.
>
> 60. The Plaintiff states that before he left the USA, the Plaintiff made
> the people he trusts far more than any other Yankee promise that the tapes
> would surface if his American family were in jeopardy. It was no longer
> safe for a family to live with its father in the USA or Canada, too many
> corrupt law enforcement authorities and lawyers working for mobsters knew
> he had the wiretap tapes. It was not his fault that his family lost their
> interests because of the illegal actions of family lawyers and their
> friends within the justice system. The Plaintiff did the best he could in
> his Clan’s defence of their homes and interests. He will die with a clear
> conscience about that fact. However, he knew if his Clan suffered in any
> fashion because of his actions trying to compel the RCMP and FBI to act
> ethically it would be his fault because he knew the federal agents in
> Canada and the USA were infinitely corrupt since 1982 when they began to
> call him a drug dealer etc.
>
> 61. The Plaintiff states that he and his wife agree that they should
> have moved to Canada as they planned when they wed in 1991 but it was a
> common decision to stay put in the USA. Simply put, the wiretap tapes that
> put his Clan in jeopardy also offered the only way that a proud but
> bankrupt father could protect his Clan in his forced absence from the
> people he loves far more than life itself. Eleven years later quite a
> number of the Yankee mobsters and their lawyers are now dead or imprisoned.
> More importantly, the Plaintiff’s children are now adults and live
> separately. The Plaintiff sees no need to keep any of the wiretap tapes in
> confidence anymore. After the election of the 42nd Parliament, he will
> begin publishing more wiretap tapes in the public domain. He will copyright
> them and consider them a form of entertainment about true history of the
> mob and offer them for sale. Any settlement of any future lawsuit about his
> knowledge of financial crimes and his Clan’s stolen assets will be for
> their benefit and that of their children. Their lawyers will need their
> father’s records in order to assist them to that end. The Crown must
> understand that this complaint is one many actions that are part of his
> records. The wiretap tapes insure that there will be no statute of
> limitations. With regards to this complaint, the Plaintiff reminds the
> Crown of paragraph 48 and the Sergeant-at-Arms took a CD and documents.
>
> 62. The Plaintiff states that the Clerk of Federal Court in the Capital
> District of NB for reasons he will never understand mailed the documents
> back to him instead of mailing them to the Commissioner of Federal Judicial
> Affairs who was expecting them. So the Plaintiff called that Commissioner’s
> office and then emailed a digital copy of the cover letter and the clerk’s
> response and was ignored as well.
>
> 63. The Plaintiff states that with regards to this complaint the Crown
> should obey Section 18(2) of the Charter and serve the document in two
> official languages. The *“Barring Notice”* should state who, when and why
> he was found to be in *“Contempt of the House”*. The Crown should not try
> to intimidate a citizen with a threat of arrest for an implied breach of a
> contract about trespass on public property not agreed to by him. The Crown
> should have published a proper *“Barring Notice”* in the Royal Gazette so
> that all Canadians could read it before attempting to arrest and charge any
> citizen for exercising his right to freedom of assembly in and around the
> most important public properties of all Canada.
>
> 64. The Plaintiff states that in 2004 during his research of the Crown
> barring citizens from parliamentary property, he found mention of Louis
> Riel being barred from the House of Commons despite the fact he had been
> democratically elected to the membership therein. However, the Plaintiff
> could not find anything within the Charter or the *Constitution *Act,
> 1967 or the* Parliament of Canada Act, *or the *Criminal Code* about how
> the Crown could take such an action against a citizen who had not been
> charged and found guilty with breaking an applicable law first. He
> recorded his opinion of the Crown barring citizens within the cover letters
> accompanying the documents sent to the Governor General, the Prime
> Minister, a Canadian Senator, the Arar Inquiry, the Chief Electoral Officer
> of Canada, the Premier, Attorney General, Speaker of the House and
> Lieutenant Governor of NB, and the Premier and Lieutenant Governor of
> Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) and many others. All the public officials
> ignored the subject of barring.
>
> 65. The Plaintiff states that in the summer of 2004 Byron Prior a
> Canadian citizen told the Plaintiff that he too was barred under threat of
> arrest from the legislative building of NL. Many parliamentarians knew that
> the Plaintiff supported Byron Prior’s pursuit of justice but he did not
> share his support of two newly merged federal Conservative parties. In
> return Byron Prior did not support his candidacy in the election of the 38
> th Parliament. They remained friends until April of 2005. They did not
> consider Byron Prior’s barring a coincidence so they decided to include
> Byron Prior in the Plaintiff’s matters in order to show their support of
> each other’s concerns about justice for their families. The Plaintiff has
> monitored Byron Prior’s actions ever since although they are no longer
> friends. Byron Prior enjoyed receiving a copy of one response in particular
> and he and his associates used copies of some the Plaintiff’s documents
> within at least five legal actions.
>
> 66. The Plaintiff states that the response from the Lieutenant Governor
> of NL is contrary to the opinions of the Deputy Prime Minister of Canada
> and the Attorney General of NB. Clearly he believed that the Attorney
> General of his province had the power to have crimes investigated. The text
> of the letter Crown’s vice regal representative in NL is as follows:
> GOVERNMENT HOUSE
>
> * Newfoundland and Labrador*
> *
> “September 10th, 2004*
>
> * Dear Mr. Amos: *
>
> * The Lieutenant Governor has asked me to acknowledge receipt of your
> letter dated 2 September, addressed directly to him, the Honourable Danny
> Williams, the Honourable John Crosbie and Mr. Brian Furey. He has asked me
> to tell you that he has neither the authority nor the responsibility over
> matters such as those raised in your letter and the associated material. *
>
> * Accordingly at his instructions, I have sent the material to the
> Honourable Thomas Marshall, QC, the Attorney General and Minister of
> Justice for Newfoundland and Labrador, with the request that he take
> whatever further action he considers necessary and appropriate to deal with
> it. *
>
> * Sincerely
> yours, *
> * Leona
> Harvey *
> *
> Secretary to
> Lieutenant Governor”*
>
> 67. The Plaintiff states that in 2004 the 37th Parliament and many
> others in NB and NL were informed that he knew of Byron Prior and Charles
> Leblanc and that he supported their pursuit of justice byway of the social
> media. He called his fellow Maritimers after reading their words about
> politicians and listened to the reasons why they were collecting social
> assistance and could not afford computers. They did not care about his
> concerns with politicians but he believed them and offered his assistance
> by giving them computers. The Plaintiff asked that they publish the truth
> about his actions and to serve politicians copies of his documents. Leblanc
> publicly insulted the Plaintiff after receiving his computer and stole
> documents he promised to give to the Attorney General of NB and gave them
> to his activist friends instead. Leblanc was asked why behaved in such a
> fashion and he wrote back that he thought he was being funny and stated
> that he was not a sheriff then sent an email asking if the Plaintiff was a
> fair comparison to his dog. That email convinced the Plaintiff that Leblanc
> was a Conservative insider because he had apparently read a letter sent to
> the Attorney General. It did not take the Plaintiff long to figure out who
> his activist friends were because Leblanc had forwarded their email address
> along with pictures of his dog. Prior was difficult to deal with but he was
> true to his word. It was he who delivered the documents to the parties
> named in paragraph 53. In 2005 Prior was sued for libel within his website.
> The Plaintiff wrote his defence and counterclaim and it remained on the
> Internet until 2010. Prior’s one website had more visitors than all the
> blogs of Leblanc until late 2006 when the New York Times reported that a
> judge found Leblanc not guilty in a criminal trial and considered him to be
> a legitimate journalist. As the readership of his blog soared, Leblanc and
> all politicians became much better friends. In 2007 the Irving media empire
> complained of the Plaintiff and Leblanc to Google and Yahoo. In response
> the Plaintiff’s blog, two email accounts and all his legal documents stored
> within Yahoo’s domain were deleted. Leblanc’s blog was deleted then
> restored. The FPF arrested Leblanc again in 2012. The Plaintiff reminded
> the Crown of a judgment of Byron Prior finding Section 301 of the *Criminal
> Code* unconstitutional and law professors came to Leblanc’s aid. The
> Plaintiff caused Leblanc’s *“other personality” *blog to be deleted not
> the FPF.
>
> 68. The Plaintiff states that the Crown is well aware of three legal
> actions against Byron Prior. One action is a civil lawsuit for libel filed
> in Supreme Court of NL in January of 2005 against Byron Prior by a MP and
> that a publication ban was placed on the matter immediately. Two are
> criminal prosecutions of Byron Prior for libel. One prosecution under
> section 301 of the *Criminal Code* was found to be unconstitutional in
> 2008. The Plaintiff was falsely imprisoned by the RCMP in a mental ward of
> a hospital after he spread the word that the Crown had lost. The Plaintiff
> does not know the judgment in the second trial under section 300. He does
> know that in 2009 Byron Prior filed some of the Plaintiff’s documents in
> the docket before he was imprisoned in a mental hospital until early 2010.
>
> 69. The Plaintiff states that it was not logical that Crown considered
> Byron Prior’s actions on the legislative properties in NL criminal. The
> Crown was arresting and prosecuting him in NL while the RCMP were issuing
> him permits to do exactly the same thing in front of the House of Commons
> for months at a time from the spring of 2006 to at least the spring 2011.
> The Crown prosecutes and defends all criminal actions at a provincial and
> federal level. If the Crown was sincere in its prosecution of Byron Prior
> it should have arrested him on the grounds of the House of Commons in the
> spring of 2006. Instead the Crown had the RCMP and a lawyer whom the
> Plaintiff ran against in the election of the 38th Parliament investigate
> Byron Prior’s concerns at the request of his MP (Later appointed a Senator)
> and the Minister of Justice (Who his left seat in the 41st Parliament
> midterm as Minister of Public Safety and was appointed to be a judge).
>
> 70. The Plaintiff states that with regards to this complaint he knows
> for certain that because of his association with Byron Prior in early 2004
> the Crown has had a conflict of interest that affects the interests of
> nearly all the federal and provincial political parties of Canada. The
> Crown is well aware that a law firm of a former Premier and a MP of NL
> represented Byron Prior in the past. The Prime Minister and his current
> Attorney General are well aware the Plaintiff published copies of letters
> from them to Byron Prior as they sat in opposition of the 37th Parliament.
>
> 71. The Plaintiff states that in his opinion banning the publication of
> legal documents after a public official sues a citizen for libel or when
> the Crown decides to prosecute the same citizen twice for libel does not
> serve the public interest and raises many questions about the actions of
> the Crown. Whereas the Plaintiff truly believes such actions only serve to
> protect the Crown and public officials from being embarrassed by their
> words and deeds since 2002 he has published on the Internet every document
> involving him that he has deemed necessary to expose the public corruption
> just like Byron Prior did beginning in 2002. That was how Byron Prior
> discovered the Plaintiff and contacted him in early 2004 and the Plaintiff
> discovered and contacted Charles Leblanc in Fredericton NB and later
> introduced them to Werner Bock of NB and his concerns. The Plaintiff
> believes that is why the Crown bars and imprisons its opponents who are
> adept with the social media. Corporate media protects privacy and never
> mentions the malice because like Louis Riel the Crown has deemed the poor
> souls to be mentally ill.
>
> 72. The Plaintiff states that in early 2006 Saga Books of Calgary,
> Alberta published a book about Byron Prior and the MP whom the Plaintiff
> ran against in 2004 and hopefully again in 2014 had researched Byron
> Prior’s matters. His report to the Minister of Justice in late 2006 has not
> been made public. More importantly the lawyer who has been the MP
> representing Fundy Royal for the past eleven years and that the former
> Minister of Public Safety acknowledged an email from the Plaintiff about
> Byron Prior that contained the entire text of his website before the writ
> was dropped for the election of the 38th Parliament. The aforesaid email
> exchange has been published in the Internet for eleven years. Everything on
> the Internet published by Byron Prior beginning in 2002 has been removed.
> The last comments of Byron Prior that the Plaintiff could find published on
> the Internet was within a few videos a “Freeman” character named Max
> published within the YouTube domain. It was an interview of Byron Prior as
> he was protesting on the grounds of the House of Commons the day after the
> Prime Minister was found in *“Contempt of Parliament”* and his most
> contemptuous minority mandate became a matter of history. His majority
> mandate is history and the Plaintiff seeks relief.
>
> 73. The Plaintiff states that he did see a comment posted in a public
> Facebook of one of Byron Prior’s many associates in British Colombia
> claiming that Byron Prior had been arrested in Ottawa in 2012 as had
> several other of his associates across Canada for various reasons during
> 2012. The whereabouts of Byron Prior are not known to the Plaintiff but he
> does know that Charles Leblanc lives one block up the same street as the
> Federal Court in Fredericton is located. Leblanc is being prosecuted by the
> Crown and suing the FPF at the same time. It is unlikely he would move far
> from the city soon. If the Crown wishes to argue this complaint Byron Prior
> and Charles Leblanc should be summoned to testify about what they know of
> this matter and of their being illegally barred from parliament properties
> as well. Failing that the Plaintiff has collected a large amount of
> documentation including documents, videos and webpages etc. He can provide
> byway of digital media much evidence for the Crown to review about the
> concerns of Byron Prior and Charles Leblanc and their association with the
> Plaintiff and many others.
>
> 74. The Plaintiff states that in June of 2009 while Byron Prior was
> before the court a supporter of his, Robin Reid informed the Plaintiff that
> she was barred from the legislative properties of Alberta and while
> visiting a constituency office of a MP she had been arrested by the RCMP
> and assaulted in a locked cell of a hospital in the St Albert area of
> Alberta. Her arrest was after her visits to the constituency offices of the
> Prime Minister and an Edmonton MLA. Ms. Reid forwarded her emails to and
> from the Prime Minister’s office, the RCMP, a former Premier and the office
> of the Sergeant-at-Arms and asked the Plaintiff to support her. The
> Plaintiff introduced himself to all the aforementioned parties in order to
> assist Robin Reid and they were ignored for years. In 2012 the Plaintiff
> discovered he could no longer assist Ms. Reid because she agreed with the
> actions of Neo Nazis who supported Byron Prior and Werner Bock. The RCMP
> and many other law enforcement authorities in Canada and the USA are well
> aware of the reasons why the Plaintiff is not associated with such people
> in any fashion other than to attack them with his written words. Neo Nazis
> are not worthy of further mention in this complaint against the Crown but
> their Zionist foe, Barry Winters is.
>
> 75. The Plaintiff states that the RCMP is well aware of the libel,
> sexual harassment, and death threats practiced against his family that have
> been published on the Internet since 2005 by fans (Trolls) who supported
> Byron Prior. Four Trolls who live in Alberta are Barry Winters, Dean Roger
> Ray, Eddy Achtem and Patrick Doran They have many “Anonymous” cohorts
> throughout Canada, the USA and the United Kingdom. The actions of these
> Trolls created an important example of cyberbullying. Law enforcement
> officials have ignored these Trolls because of the Plaintiff’s standing as
> a whistleblower exposing corruption within the justice system. The
> Plaintiff is aware that several people complained about their actions over
> the years. In fact the mother of Dean Roger Ray recently her indignation in
> Barry Winter’s blog. Complaints about Barry Winters can be seen on the
> Internet by Glen Canning and Professor Kris Wells, two politically
> well-connected people who complain of cyberbullying often. Proof the
> Edmonton Police Force (EPS), RCMP, FBI and police in the UK have been
> ignoring the Plaintiff’s complaints about these Trolls can also viewed on
> the Internet. The Plaintiff fought fire with fire but did so in a legal
> fashion and kept the police fully informed of his actions. The Plaintiff
> was successful in causing numerous egregious videos and several blogs to be
> taken down after doing his best to find out who the “Anonymous” people were
> and reporting them. He saved all the blogs and videos published about his
> family before the malice was removed from public view. Three Trolls who
> continue to attack his family and others are Dean Roger Ray, Barry Winters
> and one government employee. A member of the legal dept. of Edmonton tried
> to claim that the Plaintiff was Barry Winters then complained to the EPS
> about the Plaintiff’s questions about her incompetence. Professor Kris
> Wells, who was associated with the Police Commission of Edmonton and Glen
> Canning, who lost his daughter to cyberbullying, said nothing. They were
> content that the Plaintiff managed to convince Google’s lawyers to remove
> one of Barry Winters’s blogs on October 23, 2014 and say nothing about his
> blog within WordPress that the Troll uses to continue his libel of them and
> their friends. Instead Glen Canning slandered the Plaintiff within Twitter
> after Kris Wells sent the Plaintiff an email stating his lawyer had advised
> him to ignore Barry Winters and his blogs.
>
> 76. The Plaintiff states that since the fall of 2014 he has given up on
> the notion that any police officer or Glen Canning and Professor Kris Wells
> would ever act with any semblance of integrity. All their actions appear to
> be for the purposes of self-promotion and personal gain. Canning and Wells
> received the same emails that were sent to politicians and law enforcement
> authorities and only Barry Winters responded to all and disputed the
> Plaintiff’s words. The EPS in June of 2015 informed the Plaintiff that they
> intend to prosecute Barry Winters for sending *“False Messages”* instead
> of prosecuting for his published malice under Sections 300 and 319 of the *Criminal
> Code*. That fact must be true because since June the Plaintiff has not
> received any emails from Barry Winters and within his blog he has slandered
> the EPS and often mentions the topic of *“False Messages”. *In the
> meantime Canning and Wells ignore the Plaintiff’s common concerns while
> continuing to profess of their abundant knowledge of bullying to university
> students and anyone else who will listen to them particularly members of
> the corporate media. The Plaintiff saves every word of Canning and Wells
> that they cause to be published on the topic cyberbullying and plans to
> file them as his exhibits to support a lawsuit to seek relief from the
> cyberbullying of his Clan. He considers the blogs of Barry Winters and
> the videos of his associates that remain published on the Internet to be
> important evidence of cyberbullying that the Crown will be arguing within a
> provincial court of his choice after the election of the 42nd Parliament.
> Therefore other than remind the Crown and others that he is recording the
> work of the Trolls, he has not reported their malice to Google and
> WordPress anymore because the RCMP should have done so long ago.
>
> 77. The Plaintiff states that in June of 2015 when a member of the EPS
> called him four times with an anonymous telephone number asking him to stop
> emailing public officials about Barry Winters’s blog and to file a formal
> complaint. The Plaintiff was offended by the anonymous talk of *“False
> Messages”.* He refused and stated that if the questionable public
> officials found his emails quoting the blog of Barry Winters upsetting then
> the EPS and the RCMP should uphold the law and do something about it in
> order to protect their reputations.
>
> 78. The Plaintiff states that until the EPS member clearly identified
> himself with his badge number in the fourth phone call and sent a follow up
> email to back up his words, the Plaintiff could not know for certain that a
> Troll or the EPS had been calling him. The Plaintiff has a record of two
> fraudulent calls to him during the same period of time, one using an RCMP
> phone number and the other used the phone number of Dana Durnford, a
> well-known Troll and friend of Byron Prior. The Plaintiff returned the
> calls. Dana Durnford in a predictable fashion denied knowing him and hung
> up but the Plaintiff did discuss the malice of Trolls with an ethical
> member of the RCMP. The RCMP and the FBI know that anyone can access
> several websites based in the USA and engage their free services to harass
> people with. The RCMP know that some programs allow cyberbullies to pretend
> to be anyone by having their telephone numbers (including that of the RCMP
> or the EPS) appear on their victims’ phone display. The Crown knows
> commercial programs assist in political deceit. Recently, it sent a former
> assistant of the MP the Plaintiff ran against Fundy-Royal in 2004 to jail
> because of robo calls.
>
> 79. The Plaintiff states that he has clearly explained his intentions to
> sue the EPS and the RCMP many times because they have been ignoring his
> complaints for eight years. It was obvious to him what the EPS was trying
> to do with him in June was trick. The RCMP has been trying to pull the same
> trick on the Plaintiff since 2003. The Crown knows that if the EPS managed
> to secure a complaint with the Plaintiff’s signature then it would delay
> his lawsuit because the EPS could claim that his complaint under
> investigation and that the EPS could say nothing about it until the matter
> had concluded. The Plaintiff informed the EPS that anyone could use an
> anonymous phone number and claim to be anyone if it wished to talk then it
> should do so from an identifiable telephone line or put it in writing just
> like he does. In fact the Plaintiff’s family have been getting anonymous
> calls for many years and the police claimed they could do nothing because
> the malicious calls came through the Internet. The RCMP would have acted
> ethically if the families of public officials were subject to the
> harassment his Clan has suffered instead of assisting in the illegal
> barring from the parliamentary properties of Canada.
>
> 80. The Plaintiff states that the subject of the Crown and Internet
> harassment became incredibly worse in 2007 long before the demise of two
> Canadian teenagers caused new cyber laws to be created and promptly
> ignored. In 2008 while the Plaintiff’s family and friends were being much
> harassed within many YouTube Channels by Trolls, the RCMP in NB created a
> YouTube channel of its own to use as tool to catch a local arsonist. As
> soon as the Plaintiff made a comment about eleven incidents of arson on his
> friend’s farm in the same area the Plaintiff and his friend were attacked
> by many Troll’s within the Crown’s domain within YouTube and the RCMP only
> laughed at the obvious malice that they were publishing for a year without
> attempting to moderate the comments. In early 2009 the comments within the
> RCMP YouTube channel change greatly with the arrest and imprisonment of
> members of the Tingley family pertaining to charges of *“Organized
> Crime”.* The libel continued until Werner Bock printed all the comments
> within the RCMP YouTube channel and delivered hard copy of it in hand to a
> local office of the RCMP. Once the Plaintiff had a conversation with a
> member of the RCMP in Moncton NB who was investigating Bock’s complaint,
> the RCMP took down their video with all the comments and said nothing
> further about it. The Plaintiff did manage to save most of the comments
> digitally before they were deleted by the Trolls and the RCMP. Years later
> the Crown stayed the *“Organized Crime” *charges against the Tingleys and
> a publication ban was placed on their concerns about malicious prosecution.
> The matter was put before the Supreme Court of Canada *Rodney Tingley, et
> al. v. Her Majesty the Queen** SCC Docket* *no. **34107 *and the
> Plaintiff had no idea of any outcome. However in late 2014 he did speak
> with some of the Tingleys and they admitted to knowing about him and his
> common concerns with the RCMP. One Tingley stated that their lawyers have
> advised them not to speak to him because of the publication ban. The same
> holds true with his former friend Werner Bock and Hank Temper another
> German who moved to NB to farm. They had trouble with the RCMP acting
> against them. A search on the Internet with their names and the Plaintiff’s
> easily proves his assistance but they will never acknowledge it as they
> attack the Crown, Bock byway of social media and Tepper byway of lawsuit.
>
> 81. The Plaintiff states that matters of harassment that the police
> refuse to investigate would have entered the realm of ridiculous in 2012 if
> the reasons behind the suicides of teenagers did not become well known by
> the corporate media. In the summer of 2012 a new member of the FPS who as
> a former member of the EPS had inspired a lawsuit for beating a client in
> Edmonton called the Plaintiff and accused him of something he could not do
> even if he wanted to while he was arguing many lawyers byway of emails
> about a matter concerning cyber stalking that was before the SCC. The
> member of the FPF accused the Plaintiff of calling the boss of Bullying
> Canada thirty times. At that time his MagicJack account had been hacked and
> although he could receive incoming calls, the Plaintiff could not call out
> to anyone. The Plaintiff freely sent the FPF his telephone logs sourced
> from MagicJack after his account restored without the Crown having to issue
> a warrant to see his telephone records. He asked the FPF and the RCMP where
> did the records of his phone calls to and from the FPF and the RCMP go if
> his account had not been hacked. The police never responded. Years later a
> Troll sent Dean Roger Ray a message through YouTube providing info about
> the Plaintiff’s MagicJack account with the correct password. Dean Roger Ray
> promptly posted two videos in YouTube clearly displaying the blatant
> violation of privacy likely to protect himself from the crime. The
> Plaintiff quickly pointed out the videos to the RCMP and they refused to
> investigate as usual. At about the same point in time the Plaintiff noticed
> that the CBC had published a record of a access to information requests. On
> the list of requests he saw his name along with several employees of CBC
> and the boss of Bullying Canada. The Plaintiff called the CBC to make
> inquiries about what he saw published on the Internet. CBC told him it was
> none of his business and advised him if he thought his rights had been
> offended to file a complaint. It appears the Plaintiff that employees of
> CBC like other questionable Crown Corporations such as the RCMP rely on
> their attorneys far too much to defend them from litigation they invite
> from citizens they purportedly serve. The employees of CBC named within the
> aforementioned and the CBC Legal Dept. are very familiar with the Plaintiff
> and of the Crown barring him from legislative properties while he running
> for public office.
>
> 82. The Plaintiff states that any politician or police officer should
> have seen enough of Barry Winter’s WordPress blog by June 22, 2015
> particularly after the very unnecessary demise of two men in Alberta
> because of the incompetence of the EPS. Barry Winters was blogging about
> the EPS using battering ram in order to execute a warrant for a 250
> dollar bylaw offence at the same time Professor Kris Wells revealed in a
> televised interview that the EPS member who was killed was the one
> investigating the cyber harassment of him. It was obvious why the police
> and politicians ignored all the death threats, sexual harassment,
> cyberbullying and hate speech of a proud Zionist who claimed to be a former
> CF officer who now working for the Department of National Defence (DND). It
> is well known that no politician in Canada is allowed to sit in Parliament
> as a member of the major parties unless they support Israel. Since 2002 the
> Plaintiff made it well known that he does not support Israeli actions and
> was against the American plan to make war on Iraq. On Aril 1, 2003 within
> two weeks of the beginning of the War on Iraq, the US Secret Service
> threatened to practice extraordinary rendition because false allegations of
> a Presidential threat were made against him by an American court. However,
> the Americans and the Crown cannot deny that what he said in two courts on
> April 1, 2003 because he published the recordings of what was truly said as
> soon as he got the court tapes. The RCMP knows those words can still be
> heard on the Internet today. In 2009, the Plaintiff began to complain of
> Barry Winters about something far more important to Canada as nation
> because of Winters’ bragging of being one of 24 CF officers who assisted
> the Americans in the planning the War on Iraq in 2002. In the Plaintiff’s
> humble opinion the mandate of the DND is Defence not Attack. He is not so
> naive to think that such plans of war do not occur but if Barry Winters was
> in fact one of the CF officers who did so then he broke his oath to the
> Crown the instant he bragged of it in his blog. If Winters was never an
> officer in the CF then he broke the law by impersonating an officer. The
> Plaintiff downloaded the emails of the Privy Council about Wikileaks. The
> bragging of Barry Winters should have been investigated in 2009 before CBC
> reported that documents released by WikiLeaks supported his information
> about Canadian involvement in the War on Iraq.
>
> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war in
> Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to allow
> Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over five years
> after he began his bragging:
>
> *January 13, 2015
> < https://baconfatreport.
> *This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
> < https://baconfatreport.
>
> *December 8, 2014
> < https://baconfatreport.
> *Why Canada Stood Tall!
> < https://baconfatreport.
>
>
>
> *Friday, October 3, 2014 Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian
> Airstrikes And Stupid Justin Trudeau*
>
>
> * Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.*
>
> *When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign in
> Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to the
> wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were involved in the
> initial planning phases of that operation. There were significant concern
> in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth of concern for
> operational guidance, direction, and forces for operations after the
> initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute” Prime Minister Chretien
> and the Liberal government changed its mind. The Canadian government told
> our amerkan cousins that we would not deploy combat troops for the Iraq
> campaign, but would deploy a Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling
> our amerkan cousins to redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s
> thinking that it was less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan
> than Iraq. But alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister
> Chretien’s then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean
> Chretien’s incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle Group,
> is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway campaign of 2006.*
>
> *What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the Canadian
> army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent, support, or
> vote of the Canadian Parliament.*
>
> *What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of less
> than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners as a “six
> pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a deployment of a Battle
> Group, nor a “war” make. *
>
> *The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have the
> “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war. That has
> been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by constitutional
> scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is remove “confidence” in
> The Crown’s Government in a “vote of non-confidence.” That could not happen
> to the Chretien Government regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it
> won’t happen in this instance with the conservative majority in The Commons
> regarding a limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.*
>
> *President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror attacks
> in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state” Afghanistan was
> the source of logistical support, command and control, and training for the
> Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The initial defeat, and removal
> from control of Afghanistan was vital and essential for the security and
> tranquility of the developed world. An ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle
> East, no matter how small, is a clear and present danger to the entire
> world. This “occupied state,” or“failed state” will prosecute an unending
> Islamic inspired war of terror against not only the “western world,” but
> Arab states “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and
> tranquility of Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence
> of an ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the
> Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.*
>
> *One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty was
> Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the amerkan’s
> nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time denigrating,
> insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time self-aggrandizing
> ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of “world peace.” Canada
> failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the G7 and or G20 will no longer
> permit that sort of sanctimonious behavior from Canada or its government
> any longer. And Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird
> , and Cabinet are fully cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial
> boards, and pundits are not.*
>
> *Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal
> mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the world to
> do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy” David Amos are
> telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security and safety by
> expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can and should attempt
> to guarantee Canadians safety by providing “humanitarian aid” somewhere,
> and call a sitting US president a “war criminal.” This morning Australia
> announced they too, were sending tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace
> of an ISIS “caliphate.”*
>
> *In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
> “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
> successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing, marginalizing,
> under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian military men and women
> to die with inadequate kit and modern equipment; so too is Prime Minister
> Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought
> to have been replaced five years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF
> fighter jock that won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or
> safer.*
>
> *My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
> Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin Trudeau
> has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not served this
> country in any way. Liberals and so called social democrats haven’t served
> this country in any way. David Amos, and other drooling fools have not
> served this great nation in any way. Yet these fools are more than prepared
> to ensure their, our safety to other nations, and then criticize them for
> doing so.*
>
> *Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security, and
> tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before shirked
> its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.*
>
> * Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now*
>
>
>
>
> * From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca <dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca>
> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
>Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM,
> Canada and the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was
> still alive
>To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> * This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
> your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply to
> this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement. *
> >>>>
>
>
>
>
> *---------- Original message ----------
>From: David Amos
> < david.raymond.amos@gmail.com <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
>Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks,
> USSOCOM, Canada and the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know
> I was still alive To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca <DECPR@forces.gc.ca>,
> Public.Affairs@socom.mil <Public.Affairs@socom.mil>,
> Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.
> john.adams@cse-cst.gc.ca <john.adams@cse-cst.gc.ca>,
> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca <william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.
> < stoffp1@parl.gc.ca <stoffp1@parl.gc.ca>>, dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
> < dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca>, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca <media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca>,
> information@forces.gc.ca <information@forces.gc.ca>, milner@unb.ca
> < milner@unb.ca>, charters@unb.ca <charters@unb.ca>, lwindsor@unb.ca
> < lwindsor@unb.ca>, sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca <sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca>,
> birgir <birgir@althingi.is <birgir@althingi.is>>, smari <smari@immi.is
> < smari@immi.is>>, greg.weston@cbc.ca <greg.weston@cbc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca
> < pm@pm.gc.ca>>, susan@blueskystrategygroup.com
> < susan@blueskystrategygroup.
> < Don@blueskystrategygroup.com>, eugene@blueskystrategygroup.
> < eugene@blueskystrategygroup.
> < americas@aljazeera.net> Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice" <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca
> < Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>>, "terry.seguin" < terry.seguin@cbc.ca
> < terry.seguin@cbc.ca>>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca <acampbell@ctv.ca>>,
> whistleblower <whistleblower@ctv.ca <whistleblower@ctv.ca>>*
>
>
> *I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David
> Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's Health
> Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on CAPAC during
> her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To be fair to him I
> just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938 <%28613-288-6938>) I suggested that
> he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise if he
> check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else about the DND
> EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact that your old CBC buddy, Tony
> Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English never impressed me. The fact
> that he set up a Canadian office is interesting though
> http://www.
> < http://www.
>
> *http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/
> < http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/
>
>
> * Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
> this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about Potash
> Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad Wall will
> fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
> http://www.scribd.com/doc/
> < http://www.scribd.com/doc/
> General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a shy political
> animal Veritas Vincit David Raymond Amos 902 800 0369 <902%20800%200369>
> Enjoy Mr Weston
> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/
> < http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/
> "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military brass
> were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he says, even
> McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping to plan the
> invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command, including a Canadian
> general. That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence
> staff, who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of
> 35,000 U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk
> was also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
> prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait." *
>
> *http://baconfat53.blogspot.
> < http://baconfat53.blogspot.
> remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there being
> weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends" demanded that
> Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American "veterans" and
> sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying into the US policy. At
> the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning in the
> planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would report to
> the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was never at
> anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there were deployed
> WMD. Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike
> and invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation (and
> end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned about the
> American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at that stage
> included no contingency for a handing over of civil authority to a vetted
> Iraqi government and bureaucracy. There was no detailed plan for Iraq being
> "liberated" and returned to its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit
> plan. This was contrary to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current
> military thought, that folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and
> others elucidated upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what
> conditions are to met before US troop can redeploy? Prime Minister Jean
> Chretien and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary
> of Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them
> correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the George W
> Bush administration was onerous American military assets were extremely
> overstretched, and Canadian military assets even more so It was proposed by
> the PMO that Canadian naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval
> quarantine operations in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would
> deploy in Afghanistan thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an
> Iraqi operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which ....not
> necessarily in that order. " You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees
> again today EH John Adams? of the CSE within the DND? *
> *http://www.socom.mil/
> < http://www.socom.mil/
>
>
> 84. The Plaintiff states that the RCMP is well aware that he went to
> western Canada in 2104 at the invitation of a fellow Maritimer in order to
> assist in his attempt to investigate the murders of many people in Northern
> BC. The Plaintiff has good reasons to doubt his fellow Maritimer’s motives.
> The fact that he did not tell the Plaintiff until he had arrived in BC that
> he had invited a Neo Nazi he knew the Plaintiff strongly disliked to the
> same protest that he was staging in front of the court house in Prince
> George on August 21, 2014. The Plaintiff was looking forward to meeting
> Lonnie Landrud so he ignored the Neo Nazi. Several months after their one
> and only meeting, Lonnie Landrud contacted the Plaintiff and asked him to
> publish a statement of his on the Internet and to forward it to anyone he
> wished. The Plaintiff obliged Landrud and did an investigation of his own
> as well. He has informed the RCMP of his opinion of their actions and has
> done nothing further except monitor the criminal proceedings the Crown has
> placed against the Neo Nazi in BC and save his videos and webpages and that
> of his associates. The words the Plaintiff stated in public in Prince
> George BC on August 21, 2014 were recorded by the Neo Nazi and published on
> the Internet and the RCMP knows the Plaintiff stands by every word. For the
> public record the Plaintiff truly believes what Lonnie Landrud told him
> despite the fact that he does not trust his Neo Nazi associates. Therefore
> the Plaintiff had no ethical dilemma whatsoever in publishing the statement
> Lonnie Landrud mailed to him in a sincere effort to assist Lonnie Landrud’s
> pursuit of justice. The Crown is well aware that Plaintiff’s former lawyer,
> Barry Bachrach once had a leader of the American Indian Movement for a
> client and that is why he ran against the former Minister of Indian Affairs
> for his seat in the 39th Parliament.
>
> 85. The Plaintiff states that while he was out west he visited Edmonton
> AB several times and met many people. He visited the home of Barry Winters
> and all his favourite haunts in the hope of meeting in person the evil
> person who had been sexually harassing and threatening to kill him and his
> children for many years. The Crown cannot deny that Winters invited him
> many times. On June 13, 2015 Barry Winters admitted the EPS warned him the
> Plaintiff was looking for him.
>
> 86. The Plaintiff states that on December 15th, 2014 the Crown in
> Alberta contacted him byway of an email account he seldom uses since his
> last communications with the Sergeant-at-Arms and Robin Reid. The Sergeant-at-Arms
> wanted to know about a contact he had that day with the constituency office
> of a recently appointed Cabinet Minister. All the other statements in this
> complaint should prove that the Plaintiff knew why a political lawyer from
> NB was ignoring a new constituent’s contacts all summer after answering a
> message in Twitter promising to meet with him. It was obvious to the
> Plaintiff that as soon as the lawyer was a Cabinet Minister he was
> attempting to use his influence to intimidate the Plaintiff byway of the Sergeant-at-Arms
> like his political associates in NB did in 2004.
>
> 87. The Plaintiff states that before he had a chance to respond to the
> email from the Sergeant-at-Arms of Alberta, three members of the RCMP members
> in plain clothes were pounding on the basement entrance of a condo at 1:30
> AM. They did not identify themselves as being the police as they attempted
> to harass the Plaintiff on private property in the middle of the night
> without a warrant. The Plaintiff was twice the age of the oldest one and
> considered them to be tough talking kids who were trying to enter a home in
> the middle of the night so as he closed the door he told them he was
> calling the cops. They hollered on the other side of the door that they
> were the cops as the Plaintiff called their headquarters and was
> immediately patched through to them. The Plaintiff refused their request
> when RCMP tried to con him into coming outside in freezing temperatures in
> the middle of the night so they could supposedly speak with him instead of
> saying what they needed to say over the telephone. If what the RCMP was
> saying was remotely true then they should have identified themselves and
> asked for him instead of someone else when he answered the door. The
> Plaintiff’s response to the RCMP’s trickery was that it was best that they
> communicate in writing and that he would be contacting their lawyers in the
> morning. The Crown received its very justifiable responses and the law was
> not upheld. The Plaintiff was ignored as the RCMP continued to harass his
> family deep into the New Year as he headed for the BC coast then back to
> the Maritimes to run for public office again.
>
> 88. The Plaintiff states that in regards to this complaint the actions
> and inactions of the Sergeant-at-Arms and the RCMP in Alberta affirmed to
> the Plaintiff that he is still barred under threat of arrest from all
> parliamentary properties in Canada because they did not deny it. The RCMP
> does not have the integrity to talk to or email him about anything because
> they know he tries to record everything just like they do. Instead of
> acting ethically the standard operating procedure of the RCMP since 2004 is
> to intimidate his friends and family in a malicious effort to impeach his
> character and separate them. That is the reason the Plaintiff stays away
> from most people most of the time. The actions of the RCMP towards the
> Plaintiff and many others and his experiences in the USA served to convince
> him that the Crown acts just like corrupt Americans. In order to cover up
> wrongs it would prefer to injure and imprison ethical citizens in mental
> wards rather than uphold the law or argue them publicly in a court of law.
> In 2002 the Plaintiff explained why he would seek public office in Canada
> to American lawyers he was suing within statements of a lawsuit about legal
> malpractice. Now he is doing the same to Canadian lawyers in the employ of
> the government whose wages are once again being paid by his fellow
> taxpayer. As the Plaintiff prepares to deal with a predicable motion to
> dismiss and a motion for a publication ban to delay and conceal this matter
> before polling day perhaps the lawyers working for the Crown should study
> the Plaintiff’s work found within documents in the Governor General’s
> office. Trust that he will look forward to talking to the first lawyer to
> answer this complaint because it has been years since he could get any
> lawyer in Canada to discuss anything with him. There is no ethical dilemma
> to be found in this statement, the Crown counsels should just do their job
> according to the law of the land, seek the documents in the possession of
> the lawyer who is the Governor General of Canada and let the political
> cards fall where they may. In closing the Plaintiff must remind the Crown
> that two members of the Canadian Forces acting as security for the Highland
> Games held on the grounds of the Lieutenant Governor’s residence in NB
> approached the Chief of the Amos Clan claiming that an unnamed party found
> him *“overbearing”. *He gave them a copy of the Governors General’s
> letter and freely left the parliamentary property.
>
> *Jurisdiction and Venue*
>
> 89. The Plaintiff states that Federal Court has jurisdiction in this
> claim against the Crown pursuant to section 17 (1) of the *Federal Courts
> Act* and he proposes that this action be tried at Fredericton, New
> Brunswick.
>
> 90. The Plaintiff prays that the Federal Court does not strike this
> complaint against the Crown. It is not without merit nor is it abusing of
> the process of this Court. This claim is definitely not frivolous or
> vexatious or immaterial or redundant.
>
> 91. The Plaintiff states he is not a lawyer or studied law at any law
> school. This is a Pro Se complaint composed by him to the best of his
> ability as a layman after studying Canadian laws on his own for ten years.
> He is compelled to act Pro Se because not one lawyer of the many whom he
> has approached in Canada and the USA over the course of the past fifteen
> years would assist him in any complaint that would impeach the character of
> an auditor or a fellow member of the bar or embarrass a justice system in
> which they practice law for a fee. However, many lawyers have been paid
> from the Plaintiff’s interests as they worked diligently to cover up many
> wrongs practiced against his family for many years. The Plaintiff considers
> two of the most offensive to him are the lawyers who are the current
> Governor General and Attorney General of Canada. The Plaintiff is acting
> upon a suggestion of a former Governor General after diligently attempting
> to settle this matter with all the Attorney Generals of Canada and the RCMP
> for twelve years.
>
> 92. The Plaintiff states that must restate the simple truth of this
> matter. It still is as he explained to the NBPC in 2004. The
> Sergeant-at-Arms in NB illegally barred the Plaintiff for political
> reasons. His actions as a whistleblower the RCMP and the liberal federal
> government were the reasons. The Plaintiff met former Premiers Bernard Lord
> and David Alward (Consular in Boston) On October 3, 2006, Premier Lord
> studied the *“Barring Notice”* after being thanked for putting the
> Crown’s malice in writing. Alward and a RCMP member heard Lord claim he
> knew nothing about it and suggest that the Plaintiff sue the
> Sergeant-at-Arms.
>
> 93. The Plaintiff states that on October 3, 2006 he quickly proved what
> the political lawyer Bernard Lord had claimed in front of his former
> Cabinet Minister was not true by presenting him with a document signed by
> his former Attorney General. Bernard Lord quickly responded that the
> Plaintiff should sue him too. The former Premier had nothing further to say
> when he was shown a copy of the Plaintiff’s cover letter that came with the
> documents and CD given to his constituency office in Moncton NB in early
> July of 2004. The Plaintiff complained of Premier Lord expelling him from
> the legislature building for political reasons not legal within the first
> paragraph of the aforesaid cover letter. The Attorney General had answered
> the Plaintiff on the Crown’s behalf after admitting he had received the
> documents given to Premier Lord and another former Premier Frank McKenna
> the year before his was appointed to be the Canadian Ambassador to the USA.
>
>
> 94. The Plaintiff states that on October 30, 2006, after he had read the
> news and discussed Justice Dennis O’Connor’s report on the Arar matter
> with many people that he knew Wayne Easter and Commissioner Giuliano
> Zacardelli were profound liars he received a call from Sgt. Vaillancourt
> of J Division of the RCMP. The Plaintiff refused to make a deal with the
> RCMP and his reasons were published on the Internet for years. Wayne
> Easter’s words quoted by CBC were the reason the RCMP called. They are as
> follows:
>
> *“Wayne Easter, the former solicitor-general who presided during the Arar
> ordeal, appeared to contradict earlier testimony from RCMP head Giuliano
> Zacardelli today when he answered questions at a commons committee.
> Responding to Justice Dennis O’Connor’s report on the Arar case at the
> public safety and national security committee, Easter said he was never
> told the RCMP had passed on false information to the United States and was
> never told the RCMP tried to correct it, as claimed by Zacardelli.*
>
> *“I was not informed that the RCMP had provided inaccurate information to
> the U.S.,” Easter told the MPs.”*
>
> 95. The Plaintiff states that whereas the Prime Minister apologized to
> Maher Arar on behalf of Canada and made $10-million settlement after the
> government wasted several years and squandered an incredible amount of
> taxpayer funds on legal fees generating Justice Dennis O’Connor’s report,
> the Plaintiff deserves at least the same sort of settlement in this matter.
>
> 96. The Plaintiff states that whereas he has been barred from access to
> parliamentary properties for a period of eleven years and that the
> aforesaid properties include ten provinces and the Nation’s Capital
> District the apologies and amount he seeks in settlement is very reasonable
> and certainly justified.
>
> The plaintiff therefore asks this court for the following relief:
>
> (a) A public apology by the Prime Minister and each Premier for the
> illegal barring of a citizen from access to parliamentary properties.
>
> (b) A declaration signed by the Minister of Public Safety and witnessed
> by the Governor General stating that the Canadian government will no longer
> allow the RCMP and the Canadian Forces to harass the Plaintiff and his Clan.
>
> (c) A settlement of eleven million dollars ($11,000,000.00) in the
> form of relief and punitive damages for being barred from eleven
> parliamentary properties for eleven years.
>
> (d) Costs to the Plaintiff in bringing this matter before the court
>
> Dated at Fredericton, NB the 15th day of September 2015
>
>
> _________________________________
>
> Plaintiff David Raymond Amos
> P.O. Box 234
> Apohaqui, NB, E5P 3G2
> Telephone no.: (902) 800-0369
> Fax no.: (506) 432-6089
> Email : David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com
>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment