Fredericton council agrees to sell historic building valued at $475K for $1K
Councillors not unanimous in vote to Lemont House in downtown
Fredericton city councillors have agreed to sell a historically significant building valued at almost half a million dollars to a private developer for $1,000, under the condition the company restore it and put it up for rent.
Councillors were split in their vote on Monday to sell the Lemont House to State Street Properties, with some voicing concerns about the sale price and about how far the terms of the agreement went in requiring the developer to charge affordable rents.
"I do just feel like we are giving a very good deal here to this developer," Coun. Cassandra LeBlanc said.
"I know not everyone agrees with that opinion, but I feel that, you know, this will end up in just a few years as expensive apartments along the water in a historic property … and all we are asking is for $1,000."
Coun.
Cassandra LeBlanc voted against selling the Lemont House to State
Street Properties, saying the agreement didn't go far enough to ensure
affordable rents. (Aidan Cox/CBC)
The Second Empire-style building at 605 Queen St. was constructed in the 1880s and was lived in by the Lemont family, who were furniture dealers and owned a store on Queen Street.
In 2021, the City of Fredericton acquired the property from Aquilini Properties as part of an undisclosed settlement following a lawsuit Aquilini launched against the city in 2019.
Aquilini owns the Crown Plaza and had at one time used the Lemont House to accommodate long-term guests.
But for years leading up to the city's acquisition of it, the building sat vacant, prompting concerns from heritage advocates about its deteriorating condition.
The Lemont House pictured in 1905. (NB Provincial Archives P210-724)
Since acquiring the Lemont House, the city granted it heritage status and made a public request for proposals, which led to the successful submission by State Street Properties.
CBC News requested an interview with State Street Properties on Monday afternoon but did not receive a response.
The company's website shows it owns several residential and commercial buildings, including on Queen, Regent and Dundonald streets.
Limit on rent prices
According to the development agreement between the city and State Street Properties, the average base rent for the 17 apartment units must be below the average new construction rental rates set out by Canada Housing and Mortgage Corporation for a period of five years.
Michael Baldwin, director of corporate services for the city, said in an interview the apartments would be bachelor and one-bedroom units.
According to the CMHC, the average rent for newly constructed one-bedroom apartments was $1,180 in 2023, and $993 for bachelor apartments.
However, the development agreement between the city and State Street Properties says that limit on rent prices is subject to being higher, according to the consumer price index and property tax increases.
During the meeting, LeBlanc tried introducing a motion to amend that agreement so that the cap on rent prices would be in place for 10 years instead of five.
Her motion also proposed eliminating the caveat allowing rent to be higher subject to consumer price index and property tax increases, but no other seconded the motion.
Fairness up for debate
The resolution to sell the Lemont House narrowly passed on Monday, with Deputy Mayor Jocelyn Pike, and councillors Greg Ericson, LeBlanc, Jason Lejeune and Ruth Breen voting against it.
Breen said she had concerns about the potential affordability of the rental units, but even more so about the fairness of the deal for the city.
"My deepest concern is that this property is valued at roughly half a million dollars, and we're selling it to a very successful developer for $1,000," she said, before the vote.
"If that's the best the market can do, I think we need to explore other options in how this can best be repurposed to serve the residents of Fredericton as a whole."
Coun. Ruth Breen said she thought the city wasn't getting a fair deal by selling the Lemont House for $1,000. (Aidan Cox/CBC)
Coun. Eric Megarity said he thinks sale price is fair for the city, considering no other private interests proposed better options, and the fact the Lemont House will likely require "a lot of money" in repairs.
"If we want to save a heritage building we have to throw something in there," Megarity said.
"And I think what we're doing is very fair and reasonable. We will get the taxes. We're bringing the heritage building back for I don't know how many decades."
According to the development agreement, the developer must begin development within 12 months of the sale, "with the aim of bringing the housing stock online as soon as is reasonably possible."
The agreement also requires the development and maintenance of the building to comply in all respects to its heritage designation pursuant to city bylaws.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
David Amos
Another big score for some fat cat in Fat Fred City
Reply to David Amos
taxpayers supporting fton really helps............i can get you a property and building for a 1000
Deja Vu Anyone???
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/risteen-heritage-fredericton-1.4993884
Valued at? Who is willing to pay 475?? Anyone?
David Amos
Reply to Al Clark
Why bother when your buddies know they can do a little backroom politicking and get it for a grand?
How come all of a sudden, brown envelopes come to mind❓
David Amos
Reply to Jos Allaire
Because logic demands it
Wait for the developer to claim the old building can't be saved and needs to be bulldozed...and presto you have a nice lot for $1,000....
Reply to Albalita Rose
Bingo
Why didn't the city lease it to the developer with say a 50 year lease at something nominal with a percent of units being affordable?
That way the city retains the asset, the developer can make a profit by not having to buy land, and some people will get affordable apartments.
Reply to Jean Ansley
Uh well it looks like the developer didn't have to buy land....
Reply to Jean Ansley
Dream on
Privatize the profits. Socialize the cost.
David Amos
Reply to Alex Stevens
Well put
Cassandra, you are 100% right. But of course, where would we be without Fredericton city council narrow minded short sightedness? Oh, right! Roads wouldn’t have been built with lamp posts in the middle of the road, homelessness wouldn’t have increased by 50% in the last year alone, opioid deaths wouldn’t be at record-breaking levels, and literacy rates among local high school grads wouldn’t hover around 50%. Hey! Does the council know how many lives could have been changed/saved with the $474K they just threw away? I’m gonna say, yes, they do. Good work, folks.
David Amos
Reply to Ian McIntyre
Surely you jest
Friend of a Friend deal?
David Amos
Reply to stephen magee
Par for the course
"this will end up in just a few years as expensive apartments "
That will be super helpful to the 1% who can afford it.
David Amos
Reply to Jack Bell
Yup
Luc Newsome
Not one of the councilors would make the same deal if they personally owned the building….but since it’s your money and not theirs it’s easy to give it away…..
David Amos
Reply to Luc Newsome
I concur
So which Coun.'s brother in law bought the property?
David Amos
Reply to Kevin Archibald
Do tell
David Amos
Reply to Lorraine Morgan
I would have given them 10 times that
Reply to Lorraine Morgan
So why did you hesitate?
Reply to David Amos
No Comments???
Fredericton nixes plan to add parking spaces along Waterloo Row
Residents express concerns over safety, road congestion and heritage preservation
City councillors voted Monday to remove Waterloo Row from a motion that would add more street parking to some Fredericton roads, after dozens of residents expressed concern about the plan.
During a council meeting in late June, city staff asked council to create about 50 new spaces on the eastern side of Waterloo Row between Lansdowne and Alexandra streets.
Waterloo Row offers a scenic route for motorists heading from the eastern end of Fredericton to its downtown, with views of the water on one side and opulent homes on the other. The road also serves as the face of Fredericton's heritage preservation area.
The proposal was met with criticism from Ward 1 Coun. Margo Sheppard, who said the addition of parking spaces seemed "antithetical" to the picturesque nature of the street and the neighbourhood it borders.
At a council meeting on Monday, Ward 11 Coun. Jason LeJeune said dozens of residents expressed concern about the proposal.
Ward 11 Coun. Jason LeJeune said dozens of residents were concerned about the proposal. (CBC News)
"Overall, residents are not experiencing the impacts that we are trying to resolve," he said.
LeJeune said residents he has heard from are worried the council is working to resolve issues that aren't supported by data and creating potential safety hazards in the process.
He said some residents thought the idea of narrowing the street to make room for parking spaces could create a delay in response times for first responders, and parallel parking could cause congestion and potential collisions.
"An overall concern was that just adding parking to arterial streets could have a lot of downstream impacts," he said. "Are we going to add parking spaces to other arterial streets like Woodstock Road, Canada Street, these connectors that we rely on to move traffic?"
Coun.
Margo Sheppard, vice-chair of the city's environmental stewardship
committee, criticized the motion that would have involved adding parking
spaces to Waterloo Row. (Aidan Cox/CBC)
He said residents also expressed worries about heritage preservation.
Sheppard repeated her concerns about the proposal on Monday, calling the road a "gateway to the city."
After debating the issue, councillors approved an amendment to remove Waterloo Row from a motion to allow parking changes on a handful of other streets in the city. The revised motion then received third reading.
The city had proposed the parking changes in an effort to improve safety and accessibility for families who use Morell Park.
Sheppard said the city should look at alternate options to create more parking in the downtown, including expanding the current parking area in the park. That would require using part of the field in Morell Park, which is currently used for recreational sports, including baseball and soccer.
City of Fredericton Ward 11 Coun. Greg Ericson said the city should look to Morell Park to add more parking. (Jennifer Sweet/CBC)
Ward 8 Coun. Greg Ericson said that location would be worth looking into as a solution.
"I think we all can recognize that baseball field down there and the two soccer pitches are not regulated professional pitches that can't be altered in their size and orientation," he said.
"There's a lot of land down there and I'm sure we can find ways to accommodate the overflow parking requirements for venues."
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fredericton-garrison-fire-report-1.7258411
Garrison District building that was set on fire may be headed for demolition
Compound would be ‘radically transformed and cheapened’ if building is torn down, historian says
The building has undergone a fire-damage assessment to see if it could be salvaged, said a spokesperson for the Department of National Defence, which owns the building at 11 Carleton St.
But the damage "has resulted in a complete structural, architectural, electrical, and mechanical loss," Kened Sadiku said.
Another spokesperson said "it is recommended that the building be demolished due to the extent of damage."
Firefighters are seen battling a fire at the old militia arms store in Fredericton in March. (Aidan Cox/CBC)
The department would not provide a copy of the fire assessment report, saying it could only be released via an access to information request.
The building, which was set on fire in March, was known as the militia arms store and dates back to 1832. It was used as a hospital starting in 1882, and it became the residence for the Carleton Street Armoury caretaker in 1918, the department says.
Sadiku said in a statement that while the Fredericton Military Compound is designated as a National Historic Site of Canada, the building itself is not, "as it does not possess significant heritage characteristics."
But John Leroux, an architectural historian in Fredericton, said it isn't accurate to say the militia arms store isn't a designated historic site or that it doesn't possess significant heritage characteristics.
"The military compound comprises four specific buildings, and it's even listed on the plaque that the militia arms store is … one of those," he said.
"It lists that building in the exact same capacity as the other three buildings there. And [the designation] speaks specifically about the character-defining elements of the militia arms store."
John Leroux, an architectural historian, said more needs to be done to save the building. (Aniekan Etuhube/CNC)
The Parks Canada National Historic Site of Canada designation for the Fredericton Military Compound can be found online and says that only four buildings remain from the original British garrison, including the militia arms store. It says the buildings are representative of early 19th century British military architecture.
The designation lists key elements that contribute to the heritage and character of the militia arms store such as its rectangular wooden two-storey massing, its steep roof, balanced facade and inset chimneys.
"If it was torn down, the national historic site designation of the military compound would be radically transformed and cheapened," said Leroux.
A
photo from July 2024 shows the boarded up building that has been deemed
a 'complete structural, architectural, electrical, and mechanical loss'
by the Department of National Defense. (Aniekan Etuhube/CBC)
The City of Fredericton is not involved in the ownership of the building but it was renting it at the time of the fire. The city did not provide an interview for this story.
Leroux said when looking at the outside of the building, much of the architectural value is still visible.
He said he wishes the Department of National Defence would speak to others who have a stake in historic downtown buildings and make sure that the right experts are consulted regarding the importance of heritage buildings.
Tearing down the building would leave a hole in downtown Fredericton, Leroux said.
"We need to do better than this," he said. "There should be no reason not to try harder to salvage that building. It's easy to say 'tear it down,' but what then? Then, the city is that much poorer for it.
"It's one of the most important buildings in Fredericton."
Harold
Skaarup sits on the board of directors for the York-Sunbury Historical
Society. He wants to see the history of the Garrison District building
be preserved by tearing it down and rebuilding it. (Hannah Rudderham/CBC)
On top of the architectural value of the old militia arms store, it also holds extensive military history, he said.
Another historian, Harold Skaarup, who sits on the board of directors of the York-Sunbury Historical Society, agrees the building is part of the city's heritage and history.
But he does agree that the building should be kept as it currently stands.
"It's an eyesore," he said. "Yes, we want to save our history. No, we don't want the city looking like it's a bag of bones."
Skaarup said that as far as he can tell, the condition of the building is bad, and if those responsible for the fire report believe it needs to come down, then it should.
The
old militia arms store is part of the Historic Garrison District in
Fredericton. The military complex is part of a National Historic Site of
Canada. (CBC)
But he still wants the history preserved and thinks the best solution would be to tear down the burned building and rebuild it.
Skaarup said this could take a considerable amount of time and money. It would need to go on a list of Department of National Defence buildings needing repairs or replacements.
But he thinks the most practical solution would be to demolish the building and have concrete plans in place to one day rebuild.
"If it's restored in the shape that it's in now, to be historically significant and in conjunction with the original plans, then it's saving the history that makes it significant," said Skaarup.
"if it's sitting on the foundation of a historic building, then it itself will be a historic building. It's just the practicality of it."
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
With files from Oliver Pearson
David Amos
We tried going too far in the past and so we're stuck too far the other way now.
Deja Vu Anyone???
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/01/fate-of-1820s-stone-building-in.htmlSaturday 26 January 2019
Fate of 1820s stone building in Fredericton causes worry
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fredericton-council-risteen-building-1.5099481
Fredericton councillors brush up on heritage process before Risteen proposal arrives
Fate of 1820s stone building in Fredericton causes worry
Owner wants to put up new apartments on property in downtown Fredericton
Concern is growing for an old stone building in downtown Fredericton, once the home of a thriving woodworking factory and now possibly headed for demolition.
The Risteen building at the corner of Queen and Smythe streets, the first cut stone building in New Brunswick, could be torn down to make way for a new development.
Gabriel Elzayat says he wants to put apartments on the property.
The prospect saddens Carl Risteen, great-grandson of Joseph Risteen, who took the building over in the 1870s.
"This building here is the cornerstone basically of Queen Street, so it's the first house in Queen Street," Risteen said.
He still lives in the house that his great-grandfather built adjacent to the building.
It was built in the 1820s by Anthony Lockwood, surveyor general of New Brunswick. When Joseph Ristine took it over, he created the Risteen Sash and Door factory.
"My great-grandfather bought the burned-out shell in about 1870 or thereabouts and fixed up the interior and built the big extension on the back — the big wooden part on the back — for his woodworking factory," Risteen said.
The products of that factory can still be found in the finishings and doorways of the New Brunswick Legislature, said Risteen.
He said he's not sure whether the building will be torn down or salvaged, but he's open to ideas about incorporating it into his new development.
The city said it hasn't received an application for development yet, but tenants are already on the move.
Ross Davidson, whose kitchen supply shop has been in the building for decades, has been told to vacate by the end of February.
"We got a notice from our landlord that the property was going to be redeveloped and that was it," Davidson said.
Heritage enthusiast Marcus Kingston wants to find a way to save it.
"It's been sitting on the spot for … nearly 200 years and it deserves to stay," he said.
Despite its history, there's no heritage designation to protect the Risteen building, which means developers are free to do whatever they want with it.
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
Shawn McShane
Johnny Horton
He has a bad habit of letting leases expiring and then telling you to get out, a kids any calls or visits to his office she discuss your lease.
** avoids (not a kids)
Ken Stephens
Yep value. That’s all that matters. Gotta Aximize that tax base!
yep money, that’s all that matters. Gotta own every property!
Respectfully
MK
Mack Leigh
Gabriel is buying up and taking all the land in the area. Not much chance he’ll save it, or sell it t a preservation group.
Mack Leigh
There are ways to preserve our historical buildings and turn them into money makers.... Erasing our historical buildings is a sad statement as to what society has become and the direction it is headed..
Alex Butt
Methinks we got the governments we deserve because we overslept N'esy Pas?
Methinks the Irving Clan didn't cry N'esy Pas?
Now Go Figure Who is crazy and who is not
http://www.biographi.ca/en/bio/lockwood_anthony_8E.html
However, the political crisis following Lieutenant Governor Smyth’s death on 27 March provided the occasion, if not the inducement, for Lockwood’s spectacular descent into madness.
An interim president of the Council being required, George Leonard*, the octogenarian senior member, was first offered the position, which he declined on the grounds of age. Despite a challenge by supporters of Christopher Billopp, Ward Chipman* assumed the post of administrator on 1 April. The challenges continued however. Lockwood attended the Council meetings on 30 April and on 1 May. Thereafter he absented himself and for the next few weeks his whereabouts are uncertain. By 24 May he had persuaded Leonard to assert his right to the presidency “in the hope that it would produce tranquillity in the province.” Ostensibly to assist in that purpose, Lockwood appointed himself as Leonard’s civil aide-de-camp and inspecting field officer, as well as acting secretary. On 25 May he attempted to disseminate Leonard’s proclamation in Saint John – while at the same time writing a letter to Chipman offering terms for his, Lockwood’s, support. From 25 to 30 May Lockwood behaved with erratic violence in Saint John: issuing threats, brawling, taking up residence in Government House, and gathering an appreciative mob. Dr Paddock attended him with scant success. By the time he returned to Fredericton on 30 May, Lockwood was approaching collapse; on the steamboat General Smyth he scribbled a desperate note to Chipman requesting release from his present public offices since his “ailment” was “subject to increase from confinement.”
David R. Amos
@Grant Buote continued
The Council considered Lockwood’s state of mind at their meeting on 31 May, hearing depositions from the doctors who had treated him and from the mayor of Saint John. The following day Lockwood set up a table in Fredericton square, at which he drank coffee, issued proclamations, and reacted pugnaciously to the crowd, before taking horse and riding about the streets firing pistols and declaring himself called to assume the government of the province. By nightfall Lockwood had been arrested and placed in the Fredericton jail. The Council received further evidence from the sheriff of York County on 2 June and were “fully satisfied” of Lockwood’s derangement. Chipman appointed a commission de lunatico inquirendo that day and by 5 June it had determined that Lockwood was legally mad, and had been since 19 May. On 7 June his wife and son petitioned for a committee of custody over his person and estate, which was immediately granted.
When George Shore, Lockwood’s replacement, examined the surveyor general’s office, he found confusion, mutilated documents, and disarray which would take “two extra employees five years to straighten out.” Furthermore, the discrepancy between Lockwood’s receipts as receiver general and the office’s bank deposit amounted to more than £2,000. Although he was moved from the jail to what was, in effect, house-arrest in September, Lockwood and his family had to suffer the public sale of his real and personal estate as the custodial committee sought to recover the missing public monies.
Methinks history can repeat itself The province has seized control of the Lockwood house before N'esy Pas?
http://www.biographi.ca/en/bio/lockwood_anthony_8E.html
The following day Lockwood set up a table in Fredericton square, at which he drank coffee, issued proclamations, and reacted pugnaciously to the crowd, before taking horse and riding about the streets firing pistols and declaring himself called to assume the government of the province. By nightfall Lockwood had been arrested and placed in the Fredericton jail. The Council received further evidence from the sheriff of York County on 2 June and were “fully satisfied” of Lockwood’s derangement. Chipman appointed a commission de lunatico inquirendo that day and by 5 June it had determined that Lockwood was legally mad, and had been since 19 May. On 7 June his wife and son petitioned for a committee of custody over his person and estate, which was immediately granted.
When George Shore, Lockwood’s replacement, examined the surveyor general’s office, he found confusion, mutilated documents, and disarray which would take “two extra employees five years to straighten out.” Furthermore, the discrepancy between Lockwood’s receipts as receiver general and the office’s bank deposit amounted to more than £2,000. Although he was moved from the jail to what was, in effect, house-arrest in September, Lockwood and his family had to suffer the public sale of his real and personal estate as the custodial committee sought to recover the missing public monies.
Emilien Forest
Finally someone with my sense of humor...now watch we'll get bumped
Louie Youssef
Why should anyone have the right to dictate what all future generations do with private property? There are people around who just love to have a cause to champion, and that's fair. But when someone spends their time, money and energy taking a risk on something, it's not right to try and change the rules of the game, mid game. If tearing down old, inefficient, obsolete buildings was prevented, New York city would never have been built.
It's called progress. Getting rid of something to build something better, that will provide badly needed housing, shouldn't be discouraged.
Well said!
If city planners in Fredericton had had their way in the 1960's/70's then the entirety of Queen Street including City Hall would have been demolished. How would this have benefited Fredericton in the long run? Are you aware of how many tour busses stop outside of City Hall on any given day in the summer months?
Last summer we lost two 'beautiful' yellow homes on Regent Street, heritage homes that could have easily been saved, when there was an open lot just up the street on the corner of Charlotte and Regent. Tourists will be less and less inclined to visit Fredericton if we keep erasing it's past. I'm all for 'progress ' as you say, however progress isn't always 'moving forward'. I welcome new builds, many of us do, but why can they not be built on existing lots that are already vacant? Or put in places that do not already have historic structures.
Heritage should belong to us all, not simply those who can afford to own it.
If I had had $7,000,000 then I would have purchased all of these properties and saved them. However only a few people can afford to do such things. I'm sure no one jumped on these purchases because no one would have assumed that a buyer would demolish them. St. Dunstan's was turned into apartments as was York House, restoration is possible, you can mix old and new.
Respectfully,
MK
Now 16 families will be able to live where previously 3 could. You take a very simplistic view of development. It's not up to just one person to say "oh, there's some vacant property, I think I'll have it and build something". That's not how it works. Not everything can be saved, for both practical and financial reasons.
Cities are growing, and everyone has a right to live in them. Just because a few people think something is pretty, it doesn't mean that saving that house, and denying many others the right to live in a city is the best thing to do. It's not right to target a specific development that doesn't have any restrictions of demolition on it after the fact. That's a policy that needs to be in place before investment is made.
I'm against it, but I respect what the majority says. That's how a democratic society works.
Those memories are important to the people who made them. Beauty is subjective. Some people may like old architecture, some people may like contemporary. There is no right or wrong. To me, people should be able to do what they like with private property, while respecting the laws that are in place.
As far as pollution, wetlands, etc, I'm not sure why that's part of this commentary. But that's your right.
Dundonald Street area property owners say they have enough apartments on their street and they don't want another...Elzayat said he will make two-bedroom units to entice families. "A single family home or an apartment, they're family dwellings. Maybe you should change your thinking on that." - May 20th, 2010
@Louie Youssef wrote
The problem is that what we are building may be newer, but is not always better. Nor is it even significantly more efficient. Very few of the apartment buildings erected in the City in the past 25 years will see a 100th birthday let alone 200.
With respect to the Risteen Building (Significance of the original portion of the building being it was the first cut stone building in the City (perhaps province) and was the home of New Brunswick's first Surveyor General), I understand Gabriel's conundrum. I had looked at this building (and the surrounding properties) a year or two earlier with the intention of incorporating the Lockwood house into a Passivhaus mixed-use complex, but, in the end, could not reduce the risk sufficiently to move forward.
Colin Seeley
To the people who are calling this building a “heritage building” – if that is so, why does it not have a designation? Shouldn’t that be your avenue, trying to get a designation, rather than badmouthing law-abiding property owners?
To those who object to building higher density housing, shouldn’t your avenue be to change the zoning bylaws if you want to prevent more apartments in the city, not bashing property owners who are not breaking any rules?
And finally, what makes any of you authorities on what has value and what doesn’t? Your own opinion? Because it doesn’t seem like it is backed by any democratic process.
Jim Cyr
John Young
David R. Amos
In a nutshell Carl said that his home is considered a heritage home and he can't change the colour of even a shingle with Fat Fred City's permission and that the reports of people trying to buy it are pure BS. I told him that he should register with CBC and tell the folks himself Carl said he can't be bothered and was going for a walk and gave me his permission to state this.
Something smells
Ray Bungay
Bob Smith
Robert Gauvin as Minister of Tourism, Heritage and Culture should step up to the plate and classify it a "historic building" It is located in the Capital District N'esy Pas?
Some of us are doing just that.
Trevis L. Kingston
1492...was the starting date of 4 sided structures as we know them on this continent.
A 200 year old structure here is socially as valuable as a 2000 year old Italian Cathedral.
Canadians travel to the four corners of the world to see what?....old buildings !
But we will never have any for tourists to see if we tear them all down.
People pay good money to see Kings Landing and the Acadian Village. (1783 plus.)
Fredericton...the City of Stately...apartment buildings?
Methinks Mayor Mikey and his cohorts no doubt like the sound of that Perhaps they will change Fat Fred City's slogan N'esy Pas?
Shawn McShane
http://www.biographi.ca/en/bio/lockwood_anthony_8E.html
Harold Benson
David R. Amos
Content disabled.
David R. Amos
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Gallant, Brian (LEG)" <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 16:29:24 +0000
Subject: RE: YO Marcus Kingston I just called but you were too busy having coffee
to talk to me about your concerns about the Risteen building
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for writing to the Leader of the Official Opposition of New
Brunswick. Please be assured that your e-mail will be reviewed.
If this is a media request, please forward your e-mail to
ashley.beaudin@gnb.cam
>. Thank you!
---
Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le chef de l’opposition
officielle du Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel
sera examiné.
Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à
ashley.beaudin@gnb.cam
---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 16:29:26 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Marcus Kingston I just called but you were too busy having coffee to talk to me about your concerns about the Risteen building
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 12:29:19 -0400
Subject: YO Marcus Kingston I just called but you were too busy having coffee
to talk to me about your concerns about the Risteen building
To: marcus.kingston@gnb.ca, mike.obrien@fredericton.ca,
blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com,
jbosnitch@gmail.com, David.Coon@gnb.ca, kris.austin@gnb.ca,
brian.gallant@gnb.ca, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca, premier@gnb.ca,
Matt.DeCourcey.c1@parl.gc.ca, bruce@downtownfredericton.ca,
dfi@downtownfredericton.ca, markandcaroline@gmail.com,
martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca,
Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Stephen.Chase@fredericton.ca, info@bellaproperties.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca,
steve.murphy@ctv.ca, Newsroom@globeandmail.com
However I did tell what I was up to Correct?
Perhaps Chucky Lebalnc and his cohorts will take up your battles with
Fat Fred City with his buddy Premier Blaine Higgs and Hon. Robert
Gauvin in particular N'esy Pas?
https://www2.gnb.ca/content/
Heritage Designations in New Brunswick
Through the Heritage Conservation Act, the province is involved in a
number of procedures that can result in different types of heritage
designations. Depending on the level and nature of significance,
places in New Brunswick may be eligible for recognition under the
following types of designations:
•Provincial Heritage Place Designation
•Municipal Heritage Conservation Area
•Local Historic Place Designation
Provincial Heritage Places and Local Historic Places are listed on the
New Brunswick Register of Historic Places and on the Canadian Register
of Historic Places. Information on the Canadian Register of Historic
Places is available at www.HistoricPlaces.ca. For National Historic
Sites and related information, contact Parks Canada Agency web site,
click here.
Hon. Robert Gauvin
 Deputy
PremierMinister of Tourism, Heritage and Culture Minister responsible for La Francophonie |
No comments:
Post a Comment