Wednesday, 25 March 2026

Justice minister won't meet premiers' demand for 'sea change' to how judges are appointed

 
 
 

Justice minister won't meet premiers' demand for 'sea change' to how judges are appointed

Premiers Ford, Legault, Moe and Smith want a greater role in appointments

Justice Minister Sean Fraser says he has no plans to change how judges are appointed in Canada despite four premiers writing to Prime Minister Mark Carney to ask for more of a say in the process.

"We haven't changed our point of view that we believe that the judicial appointments process is functioning," Fraser said Tuesday on his way into a cabinet meeting. 

Fraser said there is already a mechanism by which the provinces can consult with the federal government over judicial appointments, and that process is working. 

"If provinces want a greater role, we welcome them to take part in that consultation process when we reach out," he said.

WATCH | Fraser says no constitutional amendments coming:
 
Justice minister open to more provincial consultation on judicial appointments, but not 'a sea change'
4 hours ago|
Duration 1:08
 
The premiers of Ontario, Quebec, Saskatchewan and Alberta are asking the federal government for an expanded role in the appointment of Superior Court judges in their provinces. Justice Minister Sean Fraser said he is open to strengthening provincial feedback on judicial candidates, but is 'certainly not looking at constitutional amendments.'

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe, Ontario Premier Doug Ford and Quebec Premier François Legault's letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney asks for reforms to the process for how justices are appointed to superior and appeal courts in the provinces, as well as how justices are appointed to the Supreme Court of Canada.

In Canada the federal government appoints judges to the Supreme Court, Federal Court, superior courts, appeal courts and the Tax Court of Canada.

Lawyers seeking a federal appointment begin by applying to the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs. Candidates that meet the eligibility criteria are evaluated by seven-member federal judiciary advisory committees in each province.

The committee then provides the federal justice minister with a list of names to choose from for each appointment. Fraser says he has regularly reached out to seek feedback from his provincial counterparts about the names provided to him by the committees.

"To the extent that [the premiers] wish to have a conversation about how we can strengthen the role of that consultation, we'd be open to it. But we're not contemplating a sea change in the manner in which judges are appointed," he said.

The provinces, meanwhile, make judicial appointments to provincial and territorial courts in their jurisdictions as well as to family, youth and small claims courts.

Meeting an international standard 

The premiers' letter says that in countries like the U.S., Germany, Australia and Switzerland, provincial-level governments make appointments to the equivalent of superior and appeal courts in their respective juristictions and they want that same authority afforded to them. 

"We are therefore requesting that federal judicial appointments for superior trial courts and courts of appeal of the provinces be chosen from candidates recommended and approved by the relevant provincial government," the letter says. 

The premiers say they also want full access to the same background information used by the federal judicial committees when selecting candidates. 

"Active engagement of our governments will help ensure that judicial appointments appropriately reflect the diversity and the unique needs of each province and territory," the letter says.

The premiers also say they want reforms to how Supreme Court justices are appointed, but the letter does not include what specific changes they want for that process. 

WATCH | Justice minister welcomes provinces 'to take part' in process:
 
Justice minister says judge appointment process working but welcomes provinces 'to take part'
7 hours ago|
Duration 1:08
 
On Tuesday, the premiers of Ontario, Quebec, Saskatchewan and Alberta published a letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney asking for an expanded role in the appointment of superior court judges in their provinces. Justice Minister Sean Fraser said Ottawa's position is that the process is already working, but 'we welcome provincial governments' participation in that process.'

Fraser said that he personally receives "a lot of positive feedback" from every province and that back and forth has let to a number of "excellent appointments."

He said that he hopes that process continues.

Industry Minister Mélanie Joly suggested that the premiers' proposal is worth thinking about. 

"We've always taken into consideration the different proposals by the Quebec government and by provinces and I think we should be open to it," she said.  

"I think the more we're able to showcase collaborative federalism in our country and make it work more, Canadians win across the country from it."

Ford has openly criticized judges in his province, accusing them of being soft on crime, interfering in municipal issues and even basing their decisions on ideology.

He went as far as to suggest that Ontario should consider electing judges, like they do south of the border, because doing so would make them more accountable for their decisions. 

"These judges that are bleeding hearts, I can't wait until they retire. Matter of fact, I'll pay them to retire earlier. I'll pay you out, for two, three, four years. Just get out of the system," he said last year.

More recently Ford called for an Ontario judge to apologize for suggesting that three Toronto police officers lied and colluded in a high-profile criminal trial.

Earlier this year Smith said her province needs more say in how upper court judges in Alberta are appointed because "80 per cent of the judges or so have been demonstrated to have Liberal Party donations."

That figure, however, does not correspond to a CBC News analysis of the 89 Alberta judges the Liberal government named or promoted since taking office in 2015. That analysis found only 20 of the 89 names match up with Liberal Party donors in the Elections Canada database, about 22 per cent of appointees.

Last month, Smith went so far as to threaten to withhold funding to support federally appointed judges in her province without more of a say on how they are appointed.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Peter Zimonjic

Senior writer

Peter Zimonjic is a senior writer for CBC News who reports for digital, radio and television. He has worked as a reporter and columnist in London, England, for the Telegraph, Times and Daily Mail, and in Canada for the Ottawa Citizen, Torstar and Sun Media. He is the author of Into The Darkness: An Account of 7/7, published by Vintage.

 
 
 
 
 

Why is Alberta bothering with a referendum? | Alberta Primetime

CTV News 
 
Mar 24, 2026
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith is gathering support from other provinces in calling for more influence on judicial appointments, a committee of MLAs set to review the Forever Canadian petition has yet to meet and the first set of deadlines in the pipeline MOU may not be met. Duane Bratt, a political scientist with Mount Royal University, and Graham Thomson, a political columnist, discuss these topics on the Politics Panel.
 

34 Comments

 
Too Too Funny Indeed
 
 
 
 

'Do you believe some judges are too lenient?' Justice minister left SPEECHLESS over absurd loophole

Canada Info 
 
Mar 24, 2026
A "legal chat" turns into a heated debate over what Jean Chrétien originally intended for the Charter. The notwithstanding clause was meant for "extreme cases," but is it being ignored when it matters most? Dive into the debate over Bill C-16 and the Supreme Court's use of "hypotheticals" to strike down mandatory sentences.
 

27 Comments

 
Notwithstanding the fact that everybody knows the Justice Minister's judges used this absurd loophole against me after I beat the Crown fair and square in Federal Court 
 
Rule 55 In special circumstances, in a proceeding, the Court may vary a rule or dispense with compliance with a rule. 
 SOR/2004-283, s. 11
 
 
 
 
 
 

Pierre Poilievre Squares Off Against Carney's Ministers | Question Period | Mar 24

Canadian Capital Clips
 
Mar 24, 2026
Conservative MPs squared off against Carney's Liberal cabinet today during question period, while Mark Carney was in Ottawa but refused to come to the House of Commons. .
 

95 Comments

 
Methinks Carney was distracted by the 3rd Reading of the Budget Implementation Act in the Senate N'esy Pas?
 
 
 
 

Mark Carney YELLS AT Pierre Poilievre after he DESTROYS Him

House Of Canada
 
Mar 25, 2026
Mark Carney YELLS AT Pierre Poilievre after he DESTROYS Him 
 
Conservatives vs Liberals in parliament is one of the most entertaining this in politics in Canada.
 

341 Comments

 
What will PP have to say if a writ is dropped?
 
 
 
 
 

Pierre Poilievre Squares Off Against Mark Carney | Question Period | Mar 25

Canadian Capital Clips
 
Mar 25, 2026
Liberal Prime Minister Mark Carney and Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre squared off during question period in the House of Commons this afternoon. 
 

51 Comments 

 
 
Trust that I called and emailed Marilyn Gladu to remind her I was paying attention after she had caused Stevey Boy to rant about Truckers again
 
David Amos 
Notwithstanding??? How about the fact that everybody knows the Justice Minister's judges used this absurd loophole against me after I beat the Crown fair and square in Federal Court? 
 
 Rule 55 In special circumstances, in a proceeding, the Court may vary a rule or dispense with compliance with a rule. SOR/2004-283, s. 11
 
David Amos 
Methinks I should mention this again N'esy Pas? 
 
Canadians lose when bloated budget bills thwart parliamentary oversight: 
Senate committee March 24, 2026 
Ottawa – Senators should push back against budget implementation bills that obstruct parliamentary scrutiny by smuggling in non-financial measures, the Senate Committee on National Finance said in a report released Tuesday,
 
 
 
 
 
 

Conservative Senator Easily Puts Liberal Minister In His Place!

Canadian Capital Clips 
 
Feb 25, 2026
Yesterday in the Senate, Conservative Senator Yonah Martin called out Liberal Minister LeBlanc for having secret meetings behind closed doors, ahead of an anticipated upcoming CUSMA review.
 

260 Comments

 
Kings County Record June 22, 2004. 
The Unconventional Candidate 
David Amos Isn’t Campaigning For Your Vote, But…. 
By Gisele McKnight FUNDY—He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle." Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot—David Amos. 
The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from running for office in Canada. 
One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail to meet Elections Canada requirements. 
When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his favourite place to do so—Fundy. Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his dissatisfaction with politicians. 
"I’ve become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum." 
The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in 1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he needed to change his life. 
"I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that sometimes in midlife." 
So Amos, who’d lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952 Panhead motorcycle. 
"Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact) experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you renew your faith in mankind – you help anyone you can, you never ask for anything, but you take what they offer." For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs and conversation all over North America. 
Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son and a daughter and become a house-husband – Mr. Mom, as he calls himself. 
He also describes himself in far more colourful terms—a motorcyclist rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud Canadian and a "wild colonial boy." 
Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his life. "But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said. "It’s alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?" 
Amos has no intention of actively campaigning. 
"I didn’t appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can call me. I’m not going to drive my opinions down their throats." 
And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one. 
"I won’t take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It’s not about money. It goes against what I’m fighting about." 
What he’s fighting for is the discussion of issues – tainted blood, the exploitation of the Maritimes’ gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to name a few. 
"The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs – fishing, farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I’m death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it (NAFTA) out the window. 
NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico. 
Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote. 
"There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me, especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right. 
Don’t necessarily vote for me, but vote." 
Although…if you’re going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have your X by his name. 
"I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and say, ‘what the hell.’"
 
 
 
 
 

Watch elected officials debate | Question Period | Mar. 24, 2025


Mar 24, 2026
Follow the daily fireworks from the House of Commons as elected officials debate about pressing issues. All questions are posed through the Speaker with the leader of the Opposition asking the first questions.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment