PCs Now Leading Liberals in NB
MQO Research spoke with 600
residents of New Brunswick to gauge the political temperature in the province
for the May edition of our quarterly political poll: Atlantic Matters.
Provincial
Politics
According to the latest polling
numbers, the PC Party has overtaken the Liberals in May. Among decided and
leaning voters:
- Current Liberal support decreased 11 percentage points to 35%.
- PC Party support jumped 6 percentage points to 43%.
- NDP support held relatively steady at 7%.
- Support for the Green Party exhibited little change as well at 11%.
- The undecided / no vote group held steady at 44% this quarter.
Government
Performance
Despite the drop in party support,
ratings for the leadership of Premier Brian Gallant held steady this quarter
with a mean score of 5.1 (on a 10-point scale).
Provincial
Outlook
The economic outlook for the
province was relatively unchanged in May. 32% of New Brunswick residents
reported that their outlook on the economy had worsened over the past three
months, up marginally from 28% in January. 51% indicated their outlook had
stayed the same, down slightly from 55% while the percentage who felt things
had gotten better held steady at 12%.
Federal
Politics
Federally, the Conservatives are now
leading the Liberals in New Brunswick. Among decided and leaning voters:
- Liberal support dropped 16 percentage points to 37%.
- Conservative support jumped 13 percentage points to 44%.
- NDP support edged down 4 percentage points to 7%.
- Green Party support increased 6 percentage points to 10%.
- Ratings of government performance under Justin Trudeau also dropped significantly with a mean score of 4.7 (down from 5.3 in October 2017).
The Atlantic Matters poll was
conducted by telephone from April 19th to May 16th, 2018 and included 600
randomly selected eligible voters from across the province. The margin of error
for the total sample is ± 4.0 percentage points 19 times out of 20.
About
MQO Research
MQO Research is one of Atlantic
Canada’s leading market research firms, providing research insights to clients
throughout the region and beyond. Our team includes experts in quantitative and
qualitative methodologies and program evaluation. MQO is a Gold Seal member of
the Marketing Research and Intelligence Association (MRIA) and as such
subscribes to the highest standards of information gathering and research
ethics in the industry in Canada.
MQO is part of Group m5, the largest
communications organization in Eastern Canada. The Group m5 family of brands
includes m5 Marketing Communications, m5 Public Affairs, MQO Research, and
Wavelight Productions.
For more information on Atlantic
Matters or MQO Research, contact:
Tracey Stephenson
tstephenson@m5.ca
Phone: 506-852-7281
Cell: 506-850-8077
tstephenson@m5.ca
Phone: 506-852-7281
Cell: 506-850-8077
ST. JOHN’S
PO Box 13305, Stn. A
55 Duckworth Street,
St. John’s, NL A1C 1E6
T 709.738.3496
F 709.738.5288
PO Box 13305, Stn. A
55 Duckworth Street,
St. John’s, NL A1C 1E6
T 709.738.3496
F 709.738.5288
HALIFAX
1883 Upper Water Street
4th Floor
Halifax, NS B3J 1S9
T 902.465.3034
F 902.422.5536
1883 Upper Water Street
4th Floor
Halifax, NS B3J 1S9
T 902.465.3034
F 902.422.5536
MONCTON
720 Main Street,
3rd Floor
Moncton, NB E1C 1E4
T 506.857.4797
F 506.855.3383
720 Main Street,
3rd Floor
Moncton, NB E1C 1E4
T 506.857.4797
F 506.855.3383
CHARLOTTETOWN
97 Queen St,
Charlottetown, PE
C1A 4B3
T 902.569.3170
F 902.569.5776
97 Queen St,
Charlottetown, PE
C1A 4B3
T 902.569.3170
F 902.569.5776
At MQO, we pride ourselves on our
commitment to professional quality research and data collection.
We employ quality controls which
exceed industry standards, and we are an accredited Gold Seal Member of the
Marketing Research and Intelligence Association.
© 2017 MQO Research, All Rights
Reserved
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nb-higgs-attack-ads-gallant-liberals-1.4668292
Brian Gallant's Liberal party has resumed its blitz of attack ads against Progressive Conservative leader, Blaine Higgs. (CBC)
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nb-higgs-attack-ads-gallant-liberals-1.4668292
Liberals ramp up attack ads against Blaine Higgs — but how accurate are they?
Fact-checking the latest ad blitz
Seeing a lot of Blaine Higgs lately?
You're not alone, and you can thank Premier Brian Gallant's Liberal Party.
But you may want to take what you're told with a grain of salt.
The party has resumed its blitz of attack ads against the Progressive Conservative leader, a barrage it began April 26 and then paused during the St. John River flood.
The Liberal-created website, "Not for You," catalogs Higgs' supposed positions on a number of issues, casting him as a supporter of big business who opposes Liberal policies to help ordinary New Brunswickers.
Ads linking to it have recently appeared online in locations ranging from Politico, a website about U.S. politics, to Ellen DeGeneres videos on Facebook. The ads are placed there by a service that aims them at internet users in New Brunswick.
Gallant defended the attack ads Thursday.
"We believe there's a clear contrast between our vision for the province and the Blaine Higgs and Conservative vision for the province," he said in Moncton.
But the content of the ads often distort or exaggerate Higgs' positions. The PC leader calls them "poor at best and pitiful at worst. … I hope people actually look a little deeper at the facts."
The site says Higgs "is against increasing the minimum wage."
The evidence? A 2011 statement when Higgs was finance minister. He floated the idea of a two-tier minimum wage, with a lower rate for employees under the age of 18.
That's not the same as opposing an increase. In fact the minimum wage rose twice while Higgs was finance minister, to $9.50 in 2011 and to $10 in 2012.
Blaine Higgs was elected leader of the New Brunswick Progressive Conservative Party Oct. 22 in Fredericton. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)
The Liberal attack site doesn't mention that.
Both increases were scheduled by the previous Liberal government, and the PC government postponed the second increase by six months to study the minimum-wage issue. But it eventually did happen.
Higgs has argued there should be a binding formula that determines increases based on cost of living, to avoid politicians timing the hikes for political benefit. He repeated that in an interview Thursday.
The Liberals passed a law that says the minister responsible must "consider" the cost of living, but the PC leader says that's not good enough.
"It's not a matter of 'looking at,' it's defining a formula that says this is how minimum wage will be managed going forward."
The Liberal attack site also claims Higgs is "against hiring more teachers."
That's based on comments he made last spring about something different: a Liberal guarantee to maintain a minimum number of teachers.
The province signed a new five-year contract with the teachers' union that said the number of teachers in the province can't fall below 7,280 over the life of the agreement.
That means the government would not be able to lay off teachers to reduce the numbers, even if the trend of declining enrolment continues and fewer teachers are needed.
Though he questioned the guarantee, Higgs did not say he was against it. He accused the Liberals of appeasing the union ahead of an election, and said he did not see "any connection" between the guarantee and better education results.
Higgs did question how the Liberals decided to create the new February holiday, suggesting they were trying to distract voters from their property-assessment controversy.
Cabinet ministers Roger Melanson and Lisa Harris at a news conference on Tuesday, where the negative ads were unveiled. (CBC)
PC
MLAs voted against the bill at first reading, and several criticized
the idea, but when it came up for a final vote last May, they did not
vote against it.
"Our role is to question government actions," Higgs said. "I never spoke against Family Day at any point in time … If we were going to oppose it, we would have stood up and opposed it, or we would have called for a standing vote."
The Liberals also criticize Higgs for supporting the municipal tax break for Canaport LNG in 2005, five years before he got involved in politics. At the time, Higgs was an executive at Irving Oil, a partner in the facility.
Initially, the Liberals claimed Higgs negotiated the tax break, but when that was proven false, they switched to arguing he supported it.
The Not For You site includes an image of an Irving Oil newspaper ad from 2005 promoting the tax deal, signed by four company executives including Higgs.
Higgs says he signed the ad because "it was in support of the whole project," though the ad is clearly designed to defend the tax deal.
But the PC leader also promised in March 2017 that as premier, he would design "a fair and equitable taxation plan where every corporation, including Irving Oil, pays their fair share."
And Higgs says the Liberal criticism is hypocritical because after they repealed the tax break in 2016 — a move he supported — they handed their own gift to Irving Oil with a reassessment of the LNG plant's property value. It reduced the tax bill by two-thirds.
The ad blitz comes less than three months before the start of the provincial election campaign.
The Liberals have had a healthy lead in public opinion polling by Corporate Research Associates, though Higgs has recruited some star candidates since the last survey who could put key ridings in play.
The turmoil from harassment allegations against Speaker Chris Collins could help the PCs in Moncton Centre. Collins has not ruled out running as an independent candidate in the riding, which could split the vote in what has been considered a safe Liberal seat.
Speaker
and Moncton Centre MLA Chris Collins, 55, has been suspended from the
Liberal caucus pending investigation of allegations of harassment. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)
The PCs have been using social media to respond to some of the attacks, though Higgs recognizes that may play into the Liberals' hands.
"If I was sitting in the premier's office and I was saying 'how do I take the focus off my record — because it's really bad and I don't want people to follow that — well, I'll attack the opposition, I'll attack my opponent, I'll try to discredit him in any way possible," he said.
"I'm very proud of my record over time and I'll sit down and talk with anybody about any of the details, but I just encourage people to look at all the facts."
You're not alone, and you can thank Premier Brian Gallant's Liberal Party.
But you may want to take what you're told with a grain of salt.
The party has resumed its blitz of attack ads against the Progressive Conservative leader, a barrage it began April 26 and then paused during the St. John River flood.
The Liberal-created website, "Not for You," catalogs Higgs' supposed positions on a number of issues, casting him as a supporter of big business who opposes Liberal policies to help ordinary New Brunswickers.
- Premier stands by attacks on Blaine Higgs over Irving Oil career
- New Liberal attack ads target Blaine Higgs's business career
Ads linking to it have recently appeared online in locations ranging from Politico, a website about U.S. politics, to Ellen DeGeneres videos on Facebook. The ads are placed there by a service that aims them at internet users in New Brunswick.
Gallant defended the attack ads Thursday.
"We believe there's a clear contrast between our vision for the province and the Blaine Higgs and Conservative vision for the province," he said in Moncton.
But the content of the ads often distort or exaggerate Higgs' positions. The PC leader calls them "poor at best and pitiful at worst. … I hope people actually look a little deeper at the facts."
Minimum wage
The site says Higgs "is against increasing the minimum wage."
The evidence? A 2011 statement when Higgs was finance minister. He floated the idea of a two-tier minimum wage, with a lower rate for employees under the age of 18.
That's not the same as opposing an increase. In fact the minimum wage rose twice while Higgs was finance minister, to $9.50 in 2011 and to $10 in 2012.
Both increases were scheduled by the previous Liberal government, and the PC government postponed the second increase by six months to study the minimum-wage issue. But it eventually did happen.
Higgs has argued there should be a binding formula that determines increases based on cost of living, to avoid politicians timing the hikes for political benefit. He repeated that in an interview Thursday.
The Liberals passed a law that says the minister responsible must "consider" the cost of living, but the PC leader says that's not good enough.
"It's not a matter of 'looking at,' it's defining a formula that says this is how minimum wage will be managed going forward."
Teachers
The Liberal attack site also claims Higgs is "against hiring more teachers."
That's based on comments he made last spring about something different: a Liberal guarantee to maintain a minimum number of teachers.
The province signed a new five-year contract with the teachers' union that said the number of teachers in the province can't fall below 7,280 over the life of the agreement.
That means the government would not be able to lay off teachers to reduce the numbers, even if the trend of declining enrolment continues and fewer teachers are needed.
Though he questioned the guarantee, Higgs did not say he was against it. He accused the Liberals of appeasing the union ahead of an election, and said he did not see "any connection" between the guarantee and better education results.
New holiday
The Liberal site says the PC opposition "was even against adding the Family Day holiday," a new statutory holiday that was added to the calendar this year.Higgs did question how the Liberals decided to create the new February holiday, suggesting they were trying to distract voters from their property-assessment controversy.
"Our role is to question government actions," Higgs said. "I never spoke against Family Day at any point in time … If we were going to oppose it, we would have stood up and opposed it, or we would have called for a standing vote."
Canaport LNG
The Liberals also criticize Higgs for supporting the municipal tax break for Canaport LNG in 2005, five years before he got involved in politics. At the time, Higgs was an executive at Irving Oil, a partner in the facility.
Initially, the Liberals claimed Higgs negotiated the tax break, but when that was proven false, they switched to arguing he supported it.
The Not For You site includes an image of an Irving Oil newspaper ad from 2005 promoting the tax deal, signed by four company executives including Higgs.
Higgs says he signed the ad because "it was in support of the whole project," though the ad is clearly designed to defend the tax deal.
But the PC leader also promised in March 2017 that as premier, he would design "a fair and equitable taxation plan where every corporation, including Irving Oil, pays their fair share."
And Higgs says the Liberal criticism is hypocritical because after they repealed the tax break in 2016 — a move he supported — they handed their own gift to Irving Oil with a reassessment of the LNG plant's property value. It reduced the tax bill by two-thirds.
Election timing
The ad blitz comes less than three months before the start of the provincial election campaign.
The Liberals have had a healthy lead in public opinion polling by Corporate Research Associates, though Higgs has recruited some star candidates since the last survey who could put key ridings in play.
The turmoil from harassment allegations against Speaker Chris Collins could help the PCs in Moncton Centre. Collins has not ruled out running as an independent candidate in the riding, which could split the vote in what has been considered a safe Liberal seat.
The PCs have been using social media to respond to some of the attacks, though Higgs recognizes that may play into the Liberals' hands.
"If I was sitting in the premier's office and I was saying 'how do I take the focus off my record — because it's really bad and I don't want people to follow that — well, I'll attack the opposition, I'll attack my opponent, I'll try to discredit him in any way possible," he said.
"I'm very proud of my record over time and I'll sit down and talk with anybody about any of the details, but I just encourage people to look at all the facts."
About the Author
Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
Andrew Clarkson
Apparently the attack adds
are not working out so well. According to an article in the Daily
Gleaner today, recent pole results released by MQO Research show the
Conservatives have overtaken the Liberals by leaning or decided voters
for the first time since the Liberals were elected. 43% for
Conservatives, 35% for Liberals, 11% Green's & 7% NDP.
@Andrew Clarkson
So another poll with no PANB, Peoples Alliance Party listed as an option.
Smooooooooth. Another fake poll.
So another poll with no PANB, Peoples Alliance Party listed as an option.
Smooooooooth. Another fake poll.
UPDATE: Poll suggests N.B. Tories take lead for first time
For the first time since New Brunswick Premier Brian Gallant took power in
2014, a poll suggests that his Liberals are not in front.
According to MQO Research, an Atlantic Canadian polling firm, the Progressive Conservatives led by Blaine Higgs enjoy 43 per cent support among decided or leaning voters, compared to 35 per cent for the Liberals.
That’s an 11-point drop for the Liberals and a six percentage point rise for the Tories since the last MQO poll in January.
“What’s really catching my attention is that federal Liberal support is down in the province and so are perceptions of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s leadership,” said Stephen Moore, vice president of research at the polling firm. “I can’t help but think that with the drop in support for the federal Liberals, the provincial Liberals are wearing a bit of that as well.”
The New Brunswick Green Party held fairly steady at 11 per cent, with the NDP at seven per cent.
However, there is also a good chunk of people who were undecided or did not declare their intentions - 43 per cent of the eligible voters who were reached.
Moore said the Tories appear to be most popular in the Saint John and Fredericton areas, whereas the Liberals hold sway in Moncton and elsewhere.
“I see a polarization and hardening there,” he said, noting that Liberal
supporters tended to be older, while the Tories were doing well with the
under-55 set.
Duncan Gallant, a New Brunswick Liberal Party spokesman, played down the results, arguing it was only a snapshot in time.
“We are proud to be focused on New Brunswick's priorities of jobs, education and healthcare, and we believe New Brunswickers will see the clear contrast between our vision of the province and Blaine Higgs’ vision.”
The Progressive Conservative spokesman also waved off the results.
“Polls come and go,” said Rick Lafrance, the Tory party president. “We’re still focused on the election in September and still building a team. Right now, a lot of our MLAs and candidates are working with flood relief. That’s what we’re really concentrating on.”
MQO says its Atlantic Matters poll was conducted by telephone from April 19 to May 16 and included 600 randomly selected eligible voters from across the province. The margin of error is plus or minus four percentage points, 19 times out of 20.
See the full poll report here:
http://mqoresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Atlantic-Matters-Report-NB-May-2018.pdf
According to MQO Research, an Atlantic Canadian polling firm, the Progressive Conservatives led by Blaine Higgs enjoy 43 per cent support among decided or leaning voters, compared to 35 per cent for the Liberals.
That’s an 11-point drop for the Liberals and a six percentage point rise for the Tories since the last MQO poll in January.
“What’s really catching my attention is that federal Liberal support is down in the province and so are perceptions of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s leadership,” said Stephen Moore, vice president of research at the polling firm. “I can’t help but think that with the drop in support for the federal Liberals, the provincial Liberals are wearing a bit of that as well.”
The New Brunswick Green Party held fairly steady at 11 per cent, with the NDP at seven per cent.
However, there is also a good chunk of people who were undecided or did not declare their intentions - 43 per cent of the eligible voters who were reached.
Moore said the Tories appear to be most popular in the Saint John and Fredericton areas, whereas the Liberals hold sway in Moncton and elsewhere.
Duncan Gallant, a New Brunswick Liberal Party spokesman, played down the results, arguing it was only a snapshot in time.
“We are proud to be focused on New Brunswick's priorities of jobs, education and healthcare, and we believe New Brunswickers will see the clear contrast between our vision of the province and Blaine Higgs’ vision.”
The Progressive Conservative spokesman also waved off the results.
“Polls come and go,” said Rick Lafrance, the Tory party president. “We’re still focused on the election in September and still building a team. Right now, a lot of our MLAs and candidates are working with flood relief. That’s what we’re really concentrating on.”
MQO says its Atlantic Matters poll was conducted by telephone from April 19 to May 16 and included 600 randomly selected eligible voters from across the province. The margin of error is plus or minus four percentage points, 19 times out of 20.
See the full poll report here:
http://mqoresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Atlantic-Matters-Report-NB-May-2018.pdf
https://www.linkedin.com/in/chris-macinnes-baa3645b/
Chris MacInnes
Partner
Halifax,
Nova Scotia, Canada
Experience
Group M5
is the largest communications organization in Atlantic Canada, with offices and
on-the-ground resources in all four Atlantic provinces, plus a US-based office
in Manchester, New Hampshire. We provide communications, marketing, government
relations, public affairs and public relations support across a broad range of
sectors and across multiple communications disciplines.
Education
Cumberland
South By-election
Release date:
May 17, 2018
Cumberland
South By-election
May 17, 2018
The Assistant Chief Electoral
Officer, Peter Gzowski, acting for Chief Electoral Officer, Richard Temporale,
has received an order from the Governor in Council for a by-election to be held
in the electoral district of Cumberland South. The ACEO has issued a writ of
election; election day will be June 19, 2018.
To date, there are three registered candidates:
Larry Duchesne Nova Scotia New Democratic Party (NDP)
Scott Lockhart Nova Scotia Liberal Party (NSLP)
To date, there are three registered candidates:
Larry Duchesne Nova Scotia New Democratic Party (NDP)
Scott Lockhart Nova Scotia Liberal Party (NSLP)
Tory Rushton
Progressive Conservative
Association of Nova Scotia (PC)
The returning office continuous poll
will be open for voting on Monday, May 21. An advance poll will be held in
Parrsboro for 7 days, from Saturday June 9 to Saturday June 16, except Sunday
and community polls will be held in Brookdale and Wentworth Centre Friday June
15 and Saturday June 16.
Watch for updates at electionsnovascotia.ca,
on Twitter @electionsns and our Facebook page facebook.com/electionsnovascotia.
Contact:
Andy LeBlanc
Director, Policy and Communications
Elections Nova Scotia
902-424-3275
Director, Policy and Communications
Elections Nova Scotia
902-424-3275
15 Cumberland South
Shelley Trenholm
ro15@electionsns.ca
ro15@electionsns.ca
----------Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 11:55:13 -0400
Subject: Attn Scott Lockhart, Larry Duchesne and Tory Rushton I just called
To: ToryRushton2018@gmail.com, news@sixrivers.ca, bill@sixrivers.ca,
larry@sixrivers.ca, scottlockhart@bellaliant.net, dcole@amherstdaily.com
Cc: motomaniac333@gmail.com,
"David.Raymond.Amos" <David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com>
Michael.Gorman@cbc.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca
http://www.sixrivers.ca/
Cumberland South NDP Ready for Fight
Cumberland South has added another candidate to the list of those who
await a provincial by-election call. The NDP once again named Larry
Duchesne as their candidate at a nomination meeting today in
Springhill.
The event was filled with a star-studded cast, including the Nova
Scotia Leader, Gary Burrill, former national NDP leader Alexa
McDonough, Truro/Bible Hill MLA, Lenore Zann, and a number of former
candidates from around the province.
(Photo - seated L to R: Gary Burrill, Alexa McDonough, standing L to
R: Lenore Zann, and Larry Duchesne)
Duchesne, a former teacher and newspaper reporter, was unopposed for
the nomination. He has carried the banner before in Cumberland South
and elsewhere in Nova Scotia, as well as a three year stint as NDP
leader in Prince Edward Island.
The provincial leader was the keynote speaker this afternoon. Burrill
admitted to certain disappointments in recent elections, but he said
there are defining moments in the world of politics and this
by-election could be one of those moments.
Burrill says Nova Scotians are facing “a moment of regret and remorse”
at the re-election of the McNeil government. He said during the last
election campaign, “Not a single one of us heard a single Liberal
candidate say anything about the abolition of school boards, not one
word.” Burrill added, “They have completely eradicated a whole level
of local/regional democratic government in our province.” He says, “It
was very similar to the Nova Scotia Health Authority where they shut
down all those local voices and created one, super centralized,
Halifax based health authority.” The NDP leader often suggests the
Liberal goal is a “Halifax city state”.
The new candidate was grateful to all those who attended the meeting.
Duchesne suggested “winning is not out of the question at all. When
parties concentrate their resources, it makes a big difference.”
Speaking of the McNeil Liberals, he noted “how Conservative they are,
but they are not progressive.”
Duchesne says Cumberland South needs representation that truly cares
for people. He said, “In Cumberland South we have some of the oldest
and some of the poorest people in the province. If we had a
progressive government we stand to benefit a lot.” He added, “Instead,
from the Liberal Government, we’re getting disempowerment,
depopulation, and joblessness.”
Duchesne says, “When you look at the potential of tidal power, we have
to make sure that control stays as local as possible so the benefits
stay local.”
He also addressed concerns for the environment, geo-thermal potential
in Springhill, further development in farming and forestry. He says,
“Potential turns to reality when you have people working to identify
opportunities and see them through.”
Duchesne is sporting an eye patch to protect a detached retina. He
will soon go in for surgery and hopes there will be no patch during
the election campaign.
The NDP nomination follows earlier nominations by the Conservatives
and the Atlantic Party. In fact, the only party that is not yet ready
for a by-election is the Liberal Party. Premier Stephen McNeil has the
exclusive right to determine when an election call. With that
privilege, he gets to decide when the time is right for his party to
hold a nomination meeting.
Six Rivers News,
P.O. Box 364
Pugwash, NS
B0K 1L0
Phone 902-614-3000 •
email news@sixrivers.ca
General Manager, Bill Martin bill@sixrivers.ca
Reporter, Larry Duchesne 902-686-3735
or larry@sixrivers.ca
Springhill Headquarters is Open
The Coffee is on, the Cookies are out and our Campaign Headquarters is
now open at 69 Main St Springhill NS.
Drop in for a visit, drink some coffee and have a snack. Or If you
want to volunteer, come in anytime.
Ask away with any questions or concerns you may have. Pick up a pin or
door knocker with info. Or get on the sign list.
We are ready to go with the upcoming bi-election.
902-597-TORY (8679)
ToryRushton2018@gmail.com
Call (902) 597-8200
@ScottLockhartNS
scottlockhart@bellaliant.net
http://www.scottlockhart.ca
Hometown
Springhill, NS
About
As a life long resident of Springhill, I am committed to making sure
Cumberland South’s voice is heard at the Government table. Let’s get
it done.
Cell (902) 297-1500
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 10:38:37 -0400
Subject: Attn Chief Electoral Officer, Richard Temporale I just called
I must ask why are you still holding to my money from the 2006
election?
To: elections@novascotia.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Cumberland South By-election
Cumberland South By-election information will be posted here. Most
recent information will appear at the top of the page. Under the House
of Assembly Act, a writ must be issued by July 24, six months from the
date the vacancy occurred.
Registered Candidates (to date)
(Candidate names will be added as registrations are received)
Tory Rushton Progressive Conservative Association of Nova Scotia (PC)
Larry Duchesne Nova Scotia New Democratic Party (NDP)
Scott Lockhart Nova Scotia Liberal Party (NSLP)
Contact Elections Nova Scotia
Street Address
7037 Mumford Road, Suite 6
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3L 2J1
Mailing Address
PO Box 2246
Halifax, NS.
B3J 3C8
Telephone
902-424-8584
1-800-565-1504 (Toll free)
902-424-7475 (TTY)
1-866-774-7074 (Toll Free TTY)
902-424-6622 (Fax)
Email
elections@novascotia.ca
Cumberland South By-election – Nomination Fee Waived
Media Release - April 18, 2018
Chief Electoral Officer, Richard Temporale, is notifying registered
parties and prospective candidates that, for the upcoming Cumberland
South by-election, the nomination deposit will not be required as part
of the nomination process outlined in Section 65(2)(b) of the Act.
Under Section 5(r) of the Act, the Chief Electoral Officer may modify
any provision of this Act to permit its use at a by-election.
Following the 40th Provincial General Election, several recommended
changes to the Elections Act were made in Volume II: Report on the
Conduct of the May 30, 2017 Provincial General Election and
Recommendations for Legislative Change, dated December 2017.
The recommendation that the $200 candidate nomination deposit
requirement be removed received unanimous support from the members of
the Election Commission who represent the three parties with two or
more elected members in the House of Assembly.
The following is an excerpt from Volume II:
Candidate Deposits
On October 25, 2017, the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta rendered
its decision in Szuchewycz v. Canada (Attorney General), stating that
the $1,000 deposit requirement for prospective candidates in federal
elections infringes on section 3 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms, which provides that: “Every citizen of Canada has the right
to vote in an election of members of the House of Commons or of a
legislative assembly and to be qualified for membership therein.” The
CEO believes that this decision applies to Nova Scotia and invalidates
Section 65 or the Elections Act and, as a result, prospective
candidates will no longer be required to deposit $200 as part of their
nomination requirements.
Recommendation 9: The Chief Electoral Officer recommends that the
candidate’s nomination deposit requirement be removed from the
legislation.
http://davidraymondamos3.
Wednesday, 16 May 2018
Yo Matt DeCourcey while you are explaining things to John Brassard why
not explain Federal Court File No T-1557-15 as well?
http://www.sixrivers.ca/
Cumberland South NDP Ready for Fight
Cumberland South has added another candidate to the list of those who
await a provincial by-election call. The NDP once again named Larry
Duchesne as their candidate at a nomination meeting today in
Springhill.
The event was filled with a star-studded cast, including the Nova
Scotia Leader, Gary Burrill, former national NDP leader Alexa
McDonough, Truro/Bible Hill MLA, Lenore Zann, and a number of former
candidates from around the province.
(Photo - seated L to R: Gary Burrill, Alexa McDonough, standing L to
R: Lenore Zann, and Larry Duchesne)
Duchesne, a former teacher and newspaper reporter, was unopposed for
the nomination. He has carried the banner before in Cumberland South
and elsewhere in Nova Scotia, as well as a three year stint as NDP
leader in Prince Edward Island.
The provincial leader was the keynote speaker this afternoon. Burrill
admitted to certain disappointments in recent elections, but he said
there are defining moments in the world of politics and this
by-election could be one of those moments.
Burrill says Nova Scotians are facing “a moment of regret and remorse”
at the re-election of the McNeil government. He said during the last
election campaign, “Not a single one of us heard a single Liberal
candidate say anything about the abolition of school boards, not one
word.” Burrill added, “They have completely eradicated a whole level
of local/regional democratic government in our province.” He says, “It
was very similar to the Nova Scotia Health Authority where they shut
down all those local voices and created one, super centralized,
Halifax based health authority.” The NDP leader often suggests the
Liberal goal is a “Halifax city state”.
The new candidate was grateful to all those who attended the meeting.
Duchesne suggested “winning is not out of the question at all. When
parties concentrate their resources, it makes a big difference.”
Speaking of the McNeil Liberals, he noted “how Conservative they are,
but they are not progressive.”
Duchesne says Cumberland South needs representation that truly cares
for people. He said, “In Cumberland South we have some of the oldest
and some of the poorest people in the province. If we had a
progressive government we stand to benefit a lot.” He added, “Instead,
from the Liberal Government, we’re getting disempowerment,
depopulation, and joblessness.”
Duchesne says, “When you look at the potential of tidal power, we have
to make sure that control stays as local as possible so the benefits
stay local.”
He also addressed concerns for the environment, geo-thermal potential
in Springhill, further development in farming and forestry. He says,
“Potential turns to reality when you have people working to identify
opportunities and see them through.”
Duchesne is sporting an eye patch to protect a detached retina. He
will soon go in for surgery and hopes there will be no patch during
the election campaign.
The NDP nomination follows earlier nominations by the Conservatives
and the Atlantic Party. In fact, the only party that is not yet ready
for a by-election is the Liberal Party. Premier Stephen McNeil has the
exclusive right to determine when an election call. With that
privilege, he gets to decide when the time is right for his party to
hold a nomination meeting.
Six Rivers News,
P.O. Box 364
Pugwash, NS
B0K 1L0
Phone 902-614-3000 •
email news@sixrivers.ca
General Manager, Bill Martin bill@sixrivers.ca
Reporter, Larry Duchesne 902-686-3735
or larry@sixrivers.ca
Springhill Headquarters is Open
The Coffee is on, the Cookies are out and our Campaign Headquarters is
now open at 69 Main St Springhill NS.
Drop in for a visit, drink some coffee and have a snack. Or If you
want to volunteer, come in anytime.
Ask away with any questions or concerns you may have. Pick up a pin or
door knocker with info. Or get on the sign list.
We are ready to go with the upcoming bi-election.
902-597-TORY (8679)
ToryRushton2018@gmail.com
Call (902) 597-8200
@ScottLockhartNS
scottlockhart@bellaliant.net
http://www.scottlockhart.ca
Hometown
Springhill, NS
About
As a life long resident of Springhill, I am committed to making sure
Cumberland South’s voice is heard at the Government table. Let’s get
it done.
Cell (902) 297-1500
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 10:38:37 -0400
Subject: Attn Chief Electoral Officer, Richard Temporale I just called
I must ask why are you still holding to my money from the 2006
election?
To: elections@novascotia.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Cumberland South By-election
Cumberland South By-election information will be posted here. Most
recent information will appear at the top of the page. Under the House
of Assembly Act, a writ must be issued by July 24, six months from the
date the vacancy occurred.
Registered Candidates (to date)
(Candidate names will be added as registrations are received)
Tory Rushton Progressive Conservative Association of Nova Scotia (PC)
Larry Duchesne Nova Scotia New Democratic Party (NDP)
Scott Lockhart Nova Scotia Liberal Party (NSLP)
Contact Elections Nova Scotia
Street Address
7037 Mumford Road, Suite 6
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3L 2J1
Mailing Address
PO Box 2246
Halifax, NS.
B3J 3C8
Telephone
902-424-8584
1-800-565-1504 (Toll free)
902-424-7475 (TTY)
1-866-774-7074 (Toll Free TTY)
902-424-6622 (Fax)
elections@novascotia.ca
Cumberland South By-election – Nomination Fee Waived
Media Release - April 18, 2018
Chief Electoral Officer, Richard Temporale, is notifying registered
parties and prospective candidates that, for the upcoming Cumberland
South by-election, the nomination deposit will not be required as part
of the nomination process outlined in Section 65(2)(b) of the Act.
Under Section 5(r) of the Act, the Chief Electoral Officer may modify
any provision of this Act to permit its use at a by-election.
Following the 40th Provincial General Election, several recommended
changes to the Elections Act were made in Volume II: Report on the
Conduct of the May 30, 2017 Provincial General Election and
Recommendations for Legislative Change, dated December 2017.
The recommendation that the $200 candidate nomination deposit
requirement be removed received unanimous support from the members of
the Election Commission who represent the three parties with two or
more elected members in the House of Assembly.
The following is an excerpt from Volume II:
Candidate Deposits
On October 25, 2017, the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta rendered
its decision in Szuchewycz v. Canada (Attorney General), stating that
the $1,000 deposit requirement for prospective candidates in federal
elections infringes on section 3 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms, which provides that: “Every citizen of Canada has the right
to vote in an election of members of the House of Commons or of a
legislative assembly and to be qualified for membership therein.” The
CEO believes that this decision applies to Nova Scotia and invalidates
Section 65 or the Elections Act and, as a result, prospective
candidates will no longer be required to deposit $200 as part of their
nomination requirements.
Recommendation 9: The Chief Electoral Officer recommends that the
candidate’s nomination deposit requirement be removed from the
legislation.
http://davidraymondamos3.
Wednesday, 16 May 2018
Yo Matt DeCourcey while you are explaining things to John Brassard why
not explain Federal Court File No T-1557-15 as well?
Chief
Electoral Officer of Nova Scotia
Nova Scotia’s Chief Electoral Officer
(CEO) is Richard P. Temporale.
Mr. Temporale was appointed to this
position in June 2012 and had been the assistant chief electoral officer at
Elections Nova Scotia since September 2008. Before that, he was with Elections
Ontario in several capacities including director, corporate services and
manager of elections officials. He also worked in municipal elections with the
City of Toronto.
As head of Elections Nova Scotia,
the chief electoral officer is accountable to the House of Assembly. The chief
electoral officer provides independent, non-partisan, strategic advice on
election-related matters and best practices in accordance with the terms of the
Elections Act, and relevant laws. The chief electoral officer supervises
the conduct of elections and provides leadership on other Elections Nova Scotia
programs, services, operations and infrastructure.
The CEO administers provincial
elections and by-elections and keeps voters and candidates aware of their
rights and responsibilities. It is the CEO’s responsibility to ensure that
election officers act with fairness and impartiality, and in compliance with
election laws (Elections Act, and House of Assembly Act). The CEO also receives
annual statements from all recognized parties and their associations, regarding
the political contributions they received and the tax receipts they issued, and
administers plebiscites under the Liquor Control Act.
During an election (or by-election),
the Chief Electoral Officer has specific powers to:
- extend the time for completing various tasks under the legislation; however, the CEO cannot extend the time for accepting nominations or the times for the opening and closing of the advance or ordinary polls
- prescribe forms and modify forms to suit existing circumstances
- remove from office any election officer who is not performing the duties of office satisfactorily, or who is showing a preference for one party over another
- appoint Returning Officers
- generally adapt the provisions of the Elections Act to fit the circumstances
Elections
Nova Scotia Commission
The Election Commission is
established under Section 356 of the Elections Act The purpose of the Commission
is to advise the Chief Electoral Officer regarding the administrative conduct
of elections and the administration of the electoral finance regime; piloting
of a procedure, equipment or technology; and initiation or conduct of studies
respecting the voting procedure, voting by persons with disabilities, and
improvements to the electoral finance regime. The Commission is composed of:
- a Chair, appointed by the Governor in Council for a term of 5 years; and
- 2 persons appointed by each of the leaders of a recognized party as defined in the House of Assembly Act for terms of 2 years each unless otherwise specified.
The Election Commission is composed
of the following members:
Nova
Scotia Election Commission Members
|
|
Person
|
Position
|
Vincent J. Maclean
|
Chair
|
Jane O'Neill
|
Representative for the Nova Scotia
Liberal Party
|
Ellen Burke
|
Representative for the Nova Scotia
Liberal Party
|
Don Fraser
|
Representative for the Nova Scotia
New Democratic Party
|
Jill Houlihan
|
Representative for the Nova Scotia
New Democratic Party
|
Cameron MacKeen
|
Representative for the Progressive
Conservative Association of Nova Scotia
|
George White
|
Representative for the Progressive
Conservative Association of Nova Scotia
|
https://www.telegraphjournal.com/times-transcript/story/46777668/poll-from-new-firm?source=story-related
Poll from new firm suggests support for Liberals strong, NBers critical of job creation efforts
A new poll suggests support for the provincial Liberals remains strong across
the province, although New Brunswickers appear critical of government job
creation efforts and its managing of the economy.
MQO Research has announced it will poll Atlantic Canadians in each of the four provinces every three months on the performance of their respective provincial and federal governments as well as their thoughts about the provincial economy.
Its first poll of New Brunswickers, released Tuesday, shows decided voter support for the Liberal party currently stands at 51 per cent.
Support for the Progressive Conservatives sits at 28 per cent.
New Democrat support polled at 11 per cent.
The Greens are at nine per cent and “other” parties are at two per cent.
The number of undecided voters was calculated at 31 per cent.
The Liberals received 42.7 per cent of the final vote share in the September 2014 provincial election, while the Tories tallied 34.6 per cent of the popular vote the last time New Brunswickers went to the polls.
The survey polled 601 New Brunswickers from April 8 to April 16, with overall results accurate to within plus or minus 4.0 percentage points, 19 out of 20 times.
That margin of error increases to 5.14 per cent when undecided voters are removed from the equation.
“This is a first effort of this scale for us,” said executive vice-president and chief strategist for MQO Research Rod Budgell in an interview with the Telegraph-Journal. “We have done one-off polls at election time as research companies do, but we haven’t done it in a consistent manner like this before.”
Budgell said the move familiarizes the public with the company’s brand.
“So for example if we call you to do a survey and it’s from MQO Research, hopefully you’ll be more familiar with our brand and recognize it as a credible research company,” he said.
MQO Research is based in St. John’s and has offices in Halifax and Moncton.
It’s a part of Group m5, including m5 Marketing Communications, m5 Public Affairs, and Wavelight Productions and Impress Design, according to the company.
Emails disclosed to the Telegraph-Journal earlier this year that m5 was
contracted in October 2015 to begin producing a series of advertising spots
specifically for the Liberal government’s strategic program review exercise.
It has been paid $165,317 for that service.
The correspondence obtained by the newspaper also showed that the marketing company made suggestions to the Liberal government on how to best get its message across.
That included the use of a “New Brunswick female voice, late 30s, early 40s” in ads to confidently deliver “hard facts” to the public.
Budgell said MQO Research is a gold seal member of the Marketing Research and Intelligence Association, independently audited every three years to ensure standards of surveying work.
Its president is also the outgoing chair of that association.
“Our business, our collateral, is our research,” Budgell said. “That’s not something we can ever compromise.
“This is a long-term initiative on our part. Three years from now there may be a different government and we will still keeping doing this in the same way.”
The first survey by MQO of New Brunswickers also asked specific questions.
When asked to rate the provincial government’s overall performance since being elected in 2014, the polling firm classified the results as “less than stellar” for the Gallant government.
On a scale of one to 10, roughly 60 per cent of respondents polled gave the Liberals a rating of five or lower.
Roughly eight per cent responded with a rating of eight or higher.
Gallant’s overall leadership was assessed with nearly identical scores.
New Brunswickers were most critical of the government performance in “creating jobs” and “managing the economy,” 73 per cent and 72 per cent providing a rating from one to five respectively.
The poll also suggests support for the federal Liberals is strong at 61 per cent of decided voters surveyed.
“The voter support is there, but there is still some work to be done,” Budgell said. “This is the public saying ‘we’re still there, but you need to work harder.
MQO Research has announced it will poll Atlantic Canadians in each of the four provinces every three months on the performance of their respective provincial and federal governments as well as their thoughts about the provincial economy.
Its first poll of New Brunswickers, released Tuesday, shows decided voter support for the Liberal party currently stands at 51 per cent.
Support for the Progressive Conservatives sits at 28 per cent.
New Democrat support polled at 11 per cent.
The Greens are at nine per cent and “other” parties are at two per cent.
The number of undecided voters was calculated at 31 per cent.
The Liberals received 42.7 per cent of the final vote share in the September 2014 provincial election, while the Tories tallied 34.6 per cent of the popular vote the last time New Brunswickers went to the polls.
The survey polled 601 New Brunswickers from April 8 to April 16, with overall results accurate to within plus or minus 4.0 percentage points, 19 out of 20 times.
That margin of error increases to 5.14 per cent when undecided voters are removed from the equation.
“This is a first effort of this scale for us,” said executive vice-president and chief strategist for MQO Research Rod Budgell in an interview with the Telegraph-Journal. “We have done one-off polls at election time as research companies do, but we haven’t done it in a consistent manner like this before.”
Budgell said the move familiarizes the public with the company’s brand.
“So for example if we call you to do a survey and it’s from MQO Research, hopefully you’ll be more familiar with our brand and recognize it as a credible research company,” he said.
MQO Research is based in St. John’s and has offices in Halifax and Moncton.
It’s a part of Group m5, including m5 Marketing Communications, m5 Public Affairs, and Wavelight Productions and Impress Design, according to the company.
It has been paid $165,317 for that service.
The correspondence obtained by the newspaper also showed that the marketing company made suggestions to the Liberal government on how to best get its message across.
That included the use of a “New Brunswick female voice, late 30s, early 40s” in ads to confidently deliver “hard facts” to the public.
Budgell said MQO Research is a gold seal member of the Marketing Research and Intelligence Association, independently audited every three years to ensure standards of surveying work.
Its president is also the outgoing chair of that association.
“Our business, our collateral, is our research,” Budgell said. “That’s not something we can ever compromise.
“This is a long-term initiative on our part. Three years from now there may be a different government and we will still keeping doing this in the same way.”
The first survey by MQO of New Brunswickers also asked specific questions.
When asked to rate the provincial government’s overall performance since being elected in 2014, the polling firm classified the results as “less than stellar” for the Gallant government.
On a scale of one to 10, roughly 60 per cent of respondents polled gave the Liberals a rating of five or lower.
Roughly eight per cent responded with a rating of eight or higher.
Gallant’s overall leadership was assessed with nearly identical scores.
New Brunswickers were most critical of the government performance in “creating jobs” and “managing the economy,” 73 per cent and 72 per cent providing a rating from one to five respectively.
The poll also suggests support for the federal Liberals is strong at 61 per cent of decided voters surveyed.
“The voter support is there, but there is still some work to be done,” Budgell said. “This is the public saying ‘we’re still there, but you need to work harder.
---------- Original message ----------
From: heather.bradley@parl.gc.ca
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 13:39:13 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Matt DeCourcey while you are explaining
things to John Brassard why not explain Federal Court File No
T-1557-15 as well?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
I am away from the office and return on May 18th. Please forward your
media inquiries to Corporate Communications. ( com@parl.gc.ca or call
613.947.4876 For matters pertaing to the Speaker'Ss office, please
contact Colette Dery (colette.dery@parl.gc.ca 6139921404)
Veuillez noter que je suis absente du bureau et serai de retour le 18
mai. Veuillez adresser vos demandes m?diatiques ? com@parl.gc.ca ou
613.947.4876. Pour les questions concernant le bureaus du Pr?sident,
veuillez communiquer avec Colette Dery. (Colette. Dery@parl.gc.ca
613.992.1404)
Heather Bradley
---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 13:39:16 +0000
Subject: RE: Yo Matt DeCourcey while you are explaining things to John
Brassard why not explain Federal Court File No T-1557-15 as well?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 13:39:13 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Matt DeCourcey while you are explaining
things to John Brassard why not explain Federal Court File No
T-1557-15 as well?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
message will be carefully reviewed.
To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future
correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write
directly to the Department of Justice at
mcu@justice.gc.ca
Thank you
-------------------
Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
Vancouver Granville.
Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
votre adresse et votre code postal.
Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.
Merci
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 09:28:50 -0400
Subject: Yo Matt DeCourcey while you are explaining things to
John Brassard why not explain Federal Court File No T-1557-15 as well?
To: "Matt.DeCourcey" <Matt.DeCourcey@parl.gc.ca>, "Jacques.Poitras"
<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, John.Brassard@parl.gc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
"andrew.scheer" <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, "TJ.Harvey"
<TJ.Harvey@parl.gc.ca>, "Karen.Ludwig" <Karen.Ludwig@parl.gc.ca>,
"Alaina.Lockhart" <Alaina.Lockhart@parl.gc.ca>, "Dale.Morgan"
<Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn"
<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
<Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>,
washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail"
<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, heather.bradley@parl.gc.ca,
pictoueastsue@gmail.com, johnlohrmla@gmail.com,
mla@esmithmccrossinmla.com, andrew@themacdonaldnotebook.ca
mayor@cbrm.ns.ca, hello@boldnewdirection.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
"jan.jensen" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>,
daniel.gosselin@cas-satj.gc.ca
Interesting leadership debate in Nova Scotia on May 24th I wonder if
they know what happened in the Federal Court of Appeal exactly one
year before EH Mr Jensen?
https://www.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
Conservative MP questions Fredericton Liberal MP's recruitment tactics
Newsletter featured pictures of door to door visits with volunteers
Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: May 16, 2018 6:00 AM AT |
This is what has happened thus far N'esy Pas?
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Good Day Sir
>>
>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>
>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>
>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>> suggested that you study closely.
>>
>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>
>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>
>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>>
>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>>
>> April 3rd, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/
>>
>>
>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>
>>
>> The only hearing thus far
>>
>> May 24th, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/
>>
>>
>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>
>> Date: 20151223
>>
>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>
>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>
>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>
>> Plaintiff
>>
>> and
>>
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>> Defendant
>>
>> ORDER
>>
>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>> December 14, 2015)
>>
>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>> in its entirety.
>>
>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>> he stated:
>>
>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>
>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>> Police.
>>
>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>
>>
>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>> is no order as to costs.
>>
>> “B. Richard Bell”
>> Judge
>>
>>
>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>
>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>
>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>> most
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>> dudes are way past too late
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Merci ,
>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>
>>
>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>
>> January 13, 2015
>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>
>> December 8, 2014
>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>
>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>
>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>
>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>> campaign of 2006.
>>
>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>
>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>
>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>
>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>
>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>
>> Subject:
>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>
>> January 30, 2007
>>
>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>
>> Mr. David Amos
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>
>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>
>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>> Minister of Health
>>
>> CM/cb
>>
>>
>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>
>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>
>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>
>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>
>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>
>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>> Traffic Services NCO
>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>>
>>
>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>> fax: 506-444-5224
>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:35 AM
>> Subject: RE My complaint against the CROWN in Federal Court Attn David
>> Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to submit a motion for a
>> publication ban on my complaint trust that you dudes are way past too
>> late
>> To: David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca, peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca
>> peacock.kurt@telegraphjournal.
>> david.akin@sunmedia.ca, robert.frater@justice.gc.ca,
>> paul.riley@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca,
>> greg@gregdelbigio.com, joyce.dewitt-vanoosten@gov.bc.
>> joan.barrett@ontario.ca, jean-vincent.lacroix@gouv.qc.
>> peter.rogers@mcinnescooper.com
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, gopublic@cbc.ca,
>> Whistleblower@ctv.ca
>>
>> https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-
>>
>> http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/
>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.
>>
>> I repeat what the Hell do I do with the Yankee wiretapes taps sell
>> them on Ebay or listen to them and argue them with you dudes in
>> Feferal Court?
>>
>> Petey Baby loses all parliamentary privelges in less than a month but
>> he still supposed to be an ethical officer of the Court CORRECT?
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:10:14 -0400
>> Subject: Yo Mr Bauer say hey to your client Obama and his buddies in
>> the USDOJ for me will ya?
>> To: RBauer@perkinscoie.com, sshimshak@paulweiss.com,
>> cspada@lswlaw.com, msmith@svlaw.com, bginsberg@pattonboggs.com,
>> gregory.craig@skadden.com, pm@pm.gc.ca, bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca
>> Cc: alevine@cooley.com, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
>> michael.rothfeld@wsj.com, remery@ecbalaw.com
>>
>> QSLS Politics
>> By Location Visit Detail
>> Visit 29,419
>> Domain Name usdoj.gov ? (U.S. Government)
>> IP Address 149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice)
>> ISP US Dept of Justice
>> Location Continent : North America
>> Country : United States (Facts)
>> State : District of Columbia
>> City : Washington
>> Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
>> Language English (U.S.) en-us
>> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
>> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
>> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
>> CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2;
>> DI60SP1001)
>> Javascript version 1.3
>> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
>> Color Depth : 32 bits
>> Time of Visit Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
>> Last Page View Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
>> Visit Length 0 seconds
>> Page Views 1
>> Referring URL http://www.google.co...
>> Search Engine google.com
>> Search Words david amos bernie madoff
>> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-
>> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-
>> Out Click
>> Time Zone UTC-5:00
>> Visitor's Time Nov 17 2012 12:33:08 pm
>> Visit Number 29,419
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>>
>>
>> Could ya tell I am investigating your pension plan bigtime? Its
>> because no member of the RCMP I have ever encountered has earned it yet
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:36:04 -0400
>> Subject: This is a brief as I can make my concerns Randy
>> To: randyedmunds@gov.nl.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> In a nutshell my concerns about the actions of the Investment Industry
>> affect the interests of every person in every district of every
>> country not just the USA and Canada. I was offering to help you with
>> Emera because my work with them and Danny Williams is well known and
>> some of it is over eight years old and in the PUBLIC Record.
>>
>> All you have to do is stand in the Legislature and ask the MInister of
>> Justice why I have been invited to sue Newfoundland by the
>> Conservatives
>>
>>
>> Obviously I am the guy the USDOJ and the SEC would not name who is the
>> link to Madoff and Putnam Investments
>>
>> Here is why
>>
>> http://banking.senate.gov/
>>
>> Notice the transcripts and webcasts of the hearing of the US Senate
>> Banking Commitee are still missing? Mr Emory should at least notice
>> Eliot Spitzer and the Dates around November 20th, 2003 in the
>> following file
>>
>> http://www.checktheevidence.
>>
>> http://occupywallst.org/users/
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Hansen, David" David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca
>> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 19:28:44 +0000
>> Subject: RE: I just called again Mr Hansen
>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Hello Mr. Amos,
>>
>> I manage the Justice Canada civil litigation section in the Atlantic
>> region. We are only responsible for litigating existing civil
>> litigation files in which the Attorney General of Canada is a named
>> defendant or plaintiff. If you are a plaintiff or defendant in an
>> existing civil litigation matter in the Atlantic region in which
>> Attorney General of Canada is a named defendant or plaintiff please
>> provide the court file number, the names of the parties in the action
>> and your question. I am not the appropriate contact for other
>> matters.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> David A. Hansen
>> Regional Director | Directeur régional
>> General Counsel |Avocat général
>> Civil Litigation and Advisory | Contentieux des affaires civiles et
>> services de consultation
>> Department of Justice | Ministère de la Justice
>> Suite 1400 – Duke Tower | Pièce 1400 – Tour Duke
>> 5251 Duke Street | 5251 rue Duke
>> Halifax, Nova Scotia | Halifax, Nouvelle- Écosse
>> B3J 1P3
>> david.hansen@justice.gc.ca
>> Telephone | Téléphone (902) 426-3261 / Facsimile | Télécopieur (902)
>> 426-2329
>> This e-mail is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client
>> privilege. Unauthorized distribution or disclosure is prohibited. If
>> you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us and delete
>> this entire e-mail.
>> Before printing think about the Environment
>> Thinking Green, please do not print this e-mail unless necessary.
>> Pensez vert, svp imprimez que si nécessaire.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:23:24 -0300
>>> Subject: ATTN FBI Special Agent Richard Deslauriers Have you talked to
>>> your buddies Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly about the wiretap tapes YET?
>>> To: boston@ic.fbi.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
>>> bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov,
>>> jcarney@carneybassil.com, bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, birgittaj@althingi.is,
>>> shmurphy@globe.com, redicecreations@gmail.com
>>>
>>> FBI Boston
>>> One Center Plaza
>>> Suite 600
>>> Boston, MA 02108
>>> Phone: (617) 742-5533
>>> Fax: (617) 223-6327
>>> E-mail: Boston@ic.fbi.gov
>>>
>>> Hours
>>> Although we operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, our normal
>>> "walk-in" business hours are from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
>>> through Friday. If you need to speak with a FBI representative at any
>>> time other than during normal business hours, please telephone our
>>> office at (617) 742-5533.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300
>>> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is
>>> finally underway now correct? What the hell do I do with the wiretap
>>> tapes Sell them on Ebay?
>>> To: Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov,
>>> Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney@carneybassil.com,
>>> bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, wolfheartlodge@live.com, shmurphy@globe.com,
>>> >> jonathan.albano@bingham.com, mvalencia@globe.com
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>>> PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov, rounappletree@aol.com
>>>
>>> http://www.bostonglobe.com/
>>>
>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>>
>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask
>>> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>
>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>> cards?
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>> United States Senate
>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>
>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>> tapes.
>>>
>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>
>>> Very truly yours,
>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "David Amos" david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>> To: "Rob Talach" rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing
>>> the Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why
>>>
>>> The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should mean
>>> a lot to you
>>>
>>> http://www.checktheevidence.
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:37:08 -0400
>>> Subject: To Hell with the KILLER COP Gilles Moreau What say you NOW
>>> Bernadine Chapman??
>>> To: Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, phil.giles@statcan.ca,
>>> maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca, Jennifer.Nixon@ps-sp.gc.ca,
>>> bartman.heidi@psic-ispc.gc.ca, Yves.J.Marineau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> david.paradiso@erc-cee.gc.ca, desaulniea@smtp.gc.ca,
>>> denise.brennan@tbs-sct.gc.ca, anne.murtha@vac-acc.gc.ca,
>>> webo@xplornet.com, julie.dickson@osfi-bsif.gc.ca,
>>> rod.giles@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, toewsv1@parl.gc.ca,
>>> Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca,Cleme
>>> >> oig@sec.gov, whistleblower@finra.org, whistle@fsa.gov.uk,
>>> david@fairwhistleblower.ca
>>> Cc: j.kroes@interpol.int, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
>>> bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.
>>> Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>>> Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca,
>>> ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>>
>>> http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/nb/
>>>
>>> http://nb.rcmpvet.ca/
>>>
>>> From: Gilles Moreau Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:03:22 -0500
>>> Subject: Re: Lets ee if the really nasty Newfy Lawyer Danny Boy
>>> Millions will explain this email to you or your boss Vic Toews EH
>>> Constable Peddle???
>>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Please cease and desist from using my name in your emails.
>>>
>>> Gilles Moreau, Chief Superintendent, CHRP and ACC
>>> Director General
>>> HR Transformation
>>> 73 Leikin Drive, M5-2-502
>>> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2
>>>
>>> Tel 613-843-6039
>>> Cel 613-818-6947
>>>
>>> Gilles Moreau, surintendant principal, CRHA et ACC
>>> Directeur général de la Transformation des ressources humaines
>>> 73 Leikin, pièce M5-2-502
>>> Ottawa, ON K1A 0R2
>>>
>>> tél 613-843-6039
>>> cel 613-818-6947
>>> gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>
---------- Original message ----------
From: "The Campaign Office of Bill Casey, Cumberland-Colchester
Liberal Candidate" <info@billcasey.ca>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:20:33 -0400
Subject: Thank you for your email re "Hey before you Red Coats swear
an Oath to the Queen and the 42nd Parliament begins perhaps the
turncoat Big Bad Billy Casey the Yankee carpetbagger David Lutz or
some Boyz from NB should explain this lawsuit to you real slow."
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you very much for taking the time to email the campaign office
for Bill Casey, the Liberal candidate for Cumberland-Colchester.
With the election campaign well under way, our office has gotten very
busy. Your input is, as always, very important to us. If your email
contains a question, we will make sure that you get a response as soon
as we can, and we thank you for your patience with our process.
If you have any questions about Bill's campaign or would like to
contribute to the campaign by volunteering, ordering a lawn sign, or
making a donation, please see Bill's campaign website at
(billcasey.liberal.ca).
Once again, thank you for your time, and we wish you a wonderful day.
Sincerely,
The Cumberland-Colchester Liberal Team
______________________________
Merci d'avoir communiqué avec le bureau de campagne électorale de Bill
Casey, candidat du Parti libéral pour la circonscription de
Cumberland-Colchester.
Puisque la campagne électorale est bien entamée, notre bureau est en
plein activité. Votre apport nous tient toujours à coeur. Si votre
message nous posait une question, nous ferions de notre mieux à vous
répondre aussitôt que possible, et nous vous remercions pour votre
patience.
Si vous avez des questions par rapport à la campagne électorale de
Bill, ou si vous désirez appuyer la campagne comme bénévole, monter un
placard ou offrir votre soutien financière, veuillez visiter notre
site web, (billcasey.liberal.ca).
Nous vous remercions encore pour votre intérêt et vous souhaitons une
bonne journée.
Cordialement,
L'équipe du Parti libéral Cumberland-Colchester
---------- Original message ----------
From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:20:44 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : Hey before you Red Coats swear an Oath
to the Queen and the 42nd Parliament begins perhaps the turncoat Big
Bad Billy Casey the Yankee carpetbagger David Lutz or some Boyz from
NB should explain this lawsuit to you real slow.
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
lalanthier@hotmail.com
Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
lalanthier@hotmail.com
To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
Thank you,
Merci ,
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Dale Morgan <dale.morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 12:27:01 -0400
Subject: Re: Yo Rob Moore I called all the candidates in the Governor
General's old stompiing grounds of Waterloo and asked for an answer to
this email in writing while most of their help just laughed at me
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I am AOL returning October 14th. Sgt. Alain DESROSIER (Grand Bay -
Westfield) will be acting i my absence. I will have my cell if you
need me. (506)435-4598
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Leadnow.ca Team" <leadnow@leadnow.ca>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 19:26:30 +0300
Subject: Thank you for contacting Leadnow.ca Re: Yo Rob Moore I called
all the candidates in the Governor General's old stompiing grounds of
Waterloo and asked for an answer to this email in writing while most
of their help just laughed at me
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for your note! We are writing to let you know we have
received your message and we’ll do our best to get back to you
directly.
With the election coming up, we have been receiving an above normal
number of emails from our community and we are having a hard time
responding to everyone. It may take us a few days, - or a few weeks -
but we’ll try our best to respond to your question or comment as soon
as possible.
We have some dedicated team members to address particularly
time-sensitive issues. If you are contacting us about a donation issue
or change, please forward your email to fundraising@leadnow.ca for a
quicker reply.
Otherwise, to make it easy for you, here are the answers to the three
most frequently asked questions we’ve received over the past month and
can expect to receive until the election.
How can I find out what’s going on in my riding?
Visit our one-stop-shop election website at votetogether.ca! Enter
your postal code, and you will find all the information about your
riding, the candidates and how you can get involved.
How can I update my riding information with you?
Send us an email including your new address and postal code, and we
will update your information in our system.
How can I get involved with the Vote Together campaign in my riding?
There are three ways for you to get involved with the Vote Together
campaign, no matter where you live. You can:
Join the Vote Together Call Team to call voters in key swing ridings
the Conservatives need to win this election and ask them to join the
campaign.
If you live near Vancouver, Calgary, Edmonton, Saskatoon, Winnipeg,
Toronto or Fredericton you can join a local Leadnow team that is
organizing in key swing ridings in these major cities. These are
ridings we’ve identified as crucial during the election - ones where a
united vote could beat the Conservative candidate. Local organizers
are building strong volunteer teams to canvass their neighbors and ask
them to join the Vote Together campaign.
Donate to the Vote Together campaign. At the end of the day, none of
this is possible without the support of grassroots contributions from
people like you. Your donation allows us to pay for the technology
needed for this campaign, our staff, the phone lines for the Call
Team, the materials for volunteers and much, much more.
Are you just a front for a political party?
Absolutely not.
Leadnow is an independent organization and we’re not affiliated with
any political party. We work across party lines on key issues --
specifically democracy, equality and climate.
We think the Harper Conservatives are standing in the way of progress
on these issues, so we’ve decided to get involved in this election.
After the election, we will push whoever is elected to work together
for a strong democracy, a fair economy, and a clean environment.
We are not throwing our support behind one party. We’re trying to
raise the bar for all the parties, and to support the candidates who
can best represent the Leadnow community’s values in Parliament, and
defeat the Harper Conservatives in their local riding.
Did you have a different question?
You can take a look at our Election FAQ section, the answer may be
there. You can find it by clicking here.
If your question is about Leadnow in general, you can find some more
answers here.
Thanks again for your message and we hope you’ve found the answer to
your question here.
With gratitude and respect,
The Leadnow Inbox Team
This email is an automatic response. Please do not reply to this email.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Info <Info@gg.ca>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 16:26:34 +0000
Subject: Auto Response / Réponse automatique
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for writing to the Office of the Secretary to the Governor
General. We appreciate hearing your views and suggestions. Responses
to specific inquiries can be expected within three weeks. Please note
that general comments and opinions may not receive a response.
*****
Nous vous remercions d'avoir écrit au Bureau du secrétaire du
gouverneur général. Nous apprécions votre point de vue et vos
suggestions. Il faut prévoir trois semaines pour une réponse à une
demande précise. Veuillez noter qu’il n’y a pas nécessairement de
suivi pour les opinions et les commentaires généraux qui sont envoys.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 1:26 PM
Subject: Yo Rob Moore I called all the candidates in the Governor General's
old stompiing grounds of Waterloo and asked for an answer to this email in
writing while most of their help just laughed at me
To: info@waterlooliberals.ca, Team@bardishchagger.ca, Diane.Freeman@ndp.ca,
contact@votepeterbraid.ca, richard.walsh@greenparty.ca, Frank@c4st.org,
Andrew@c4st.org, executive@fairvotewrc.ca, leadnow <leadnow@leadnow.ca>,
"Dale.Morgan" <Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "john.warr" <
john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "roger.l.brown" <roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
info <info@gg.ca>, president@acoa-apeca.gc.ca, Paul.moore@acoa-apeca.gc.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
http://www.acoa-apeca.gc.ca/
http://news.gc.ca/web/Dha.do?
Paul Moore
Manager, Communications
Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
(902) 426-3470/ (902) 222-3360 (cell)
E-mail: Paul.moore@acoa-apeca.gc.ca
The Honourable Rob Moore
Minister of State (Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency) Rob Moore was
first elected to the House of Commons in 2004 and re-elected in 2006,
2008 and 2011.
In July 2013, Mr. Moore was appointed Minister of State (Atlantic
Canada Opportunities Agency). He had previously been appointed
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice and Attorney
General of Canada in February 2006 and Minister of State (Small
Business and Tourism) in January 2010.
Mr. Moore was Chair of the House of Commons Standing Committee on
Canadian Heritage. He was also a member of the legislative committee
on Bill C-11 (Copyright Modernization Act).
Mr. Moore has a Bachelor of Arts degree in business administration
from the University of New Brunswick in Saint John and a Bachelor of
Laws degree from the University of New Brunswick in Fredericton. He
was called to the New Brunswick Bar in June 2000.
Mr. Moore was born in Gander, Newfoundland and Labrador, in 1974. He
and his wife Melinda currently live in Quispamsis, New Brunswick, with
their four children.
http://www.c4st.org/
http://www.fairvotewrc.ca/
"The Election Has Been Called So It’s Game On"
http://www.votetogether.ca/
Waterloo: State Of Play
Based on past election results, it is expected that a non-Conservative
candidate can win in this riding if people vote together for change.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 13:35:30 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Here is my latest complaint about the SEC, Banksters and
Taxmen
To: craig@hubley.org, southshore.coc@gmail.com
Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
http://www.
http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?
http://voteswap.ca/Main_Page
https://twitter.com/craig_
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Craig Hubley and 5 others followed you
Craig Hubley Kenneth Jackson Alaina Lockhart Jennifer Mckenzie Love
Not War Beth Baker
https://twitter.com/Craig_
Craig Hubley @Craig_Hubley follows you
Co-voting (voting together in various ways) can break monopoly on
power of back rooms & ideological partisans.
http://facebook.com/
Cuba
voteswap.ca
Joined March 2007
http://www.electionprediction.
15 10 07 Craig Hubley
71.7.138.94
This riding is the NDP's only hope for a new seat in New Brunswick.
They are going to hit it with everything they've got in the last ten
days of the campaign, and every volunteer in NB and some of NS and PEI
will be in this riding making people aware that Jennifer McKenzie is
far ahead of Lockhart despite her cute Trudeau visit. That makes this
NDP vs. Con too close to call. The temptation of knocking out Rob
Moore will be too much even for stalwart Liberals who know the NDP has
the better candidate here.
And the better campaign, if you look at what each candidate is doing
and what they're talking about. Lockhart is running a classic also-ran
for-the-troops campaign but it's not going to take the seat from
Moore.
I cannot call it NDP due to the party's bad Atlantic numbers and
Trudeau's spoiler visit, but since Liberals pull votes from Cons more
than from NDP, it's quite likely that even that visit could end up
helping Ms. McKenzie.
This one has been called prematurely. Conservatives in this region, as
Tony put it, are indeed 'toast', and Rob Moore's fall will demonstrate
it.
15 10 07 Atlantic Election Guy
142.134.72.191
To start, I don't appreciate the previous post at all. Atlantic
Canadian voters are not stupid for not specifically voting out Harper
and voting their personal preference. It's an election, people have
the right to choose.
However, something might be up in the riding. Trudeau made a stop to
Sussex and had an encouraging rally. Does anyone know if the change
momentum is building here? It would be one hell of an upset if
Lockhart took this riding.
15 10 01 Craig Hubley
96.30.183.66
Threehundredeight.com shows, as of October 1, Green support at a
whopping 10.8%. That's more than any other NB riding other than
Fredericton and NB Southwest. More than enough to hand this to the NDP
even if no Liberal shifts their vote from what all sources seem to say
is 3rd place candidate.
Next door in Fredericton, Mary-Lou Babineau is the strongest 'star'
candidate the Greens have ever run in the Maritimes next to May
herself in 2008. Her campaign will be getting donations, volunteers,
lip service, call-ins, family pressure, all from other Maritime
ridings. The word is out: Mary Lou gets it this time, and NB Southwest
and Fundy Royal will get that attention next time. But they won't get
that attention if they just shift their vote NDP without recording
that fact by publicly vote swapping: No one would know what the real
support for the Greens was in those ridings if they just shifted
silently NDP without asking for a vote for Mary Lou. This time around,
the Greens know this, and are encouraging public swaps and reciprocity
requests.
Just as a statistical fact, formal vote swaps just between NB
Southwest and Fundy Royal Green voters, and Fredericton NDP voters,
would certainly elect Andrew Graham and Jennifer McKenzie, with no one
having to agree to vote for a Liberal. Add the Greens in Saint John --
Rothesay and Tobique Mactaquac to the Liberal totals and Wayne Long,
T. J. Harvey also go to the House. Three of those four ridings
participating probably elects Mary Lou Babineau in Fredericton for the
Greens.
So voters in western NB including Fredericton have a pretty clear
choice: Start to call friends, family and colleagues across riding
boundaries and get Andrew Graham, Jennifer McKenzie, Wayne Long, T. J.
Harvey and Mary Lou Babineau into the House to represent them... or
let the party leaders and partisan paranoids rule their vote and end
up with Richard Bragdon, Rob Moore, John Williamson, Rodney Weston and
Keith Ashfield. Again.
All while knowing that if Harper gets *ZERO SEATS IN THE MARITIMES*,
as is very possible this time, he could not possibly form a viable
government even with the most seats.
So my question is, are the progressive voters of New Brunswick so
stupid and partisan that they will not realize they can swing this
whole thing, and put one of the strongest set of MPs that ever served
into the House to stand for them? A set of MPs that, by the way, could
all floor cross to any of the three parties any day, should one of
them seriously betray NB.
I'm not calling this one, I'm pointing out that we have absolutely no
idea how hard that Green vote will swing. A hard swing changes this
riding, if the polls stay steady. A more even split with everyone
sticking to their first choice party elects the Conservatives. It's
not something that will show up in riding level polls, more like the
many thousands of votes that shifted for Elizabeth May in 2011, so I
think this one remains a TCTC to election day.
15 09 18 s
99.252.133.90
A lot of people keep thinking the Conservatives are going to take this
one like they have in every election sense 1917, except 1993. I
wouldn't be so quick to judge. 308.com has this riding in a deadlock
between the Conservatives and NDP. Time will tell!
15 09 13 A.S.
99.233.125.239
Whatever the projection sites say, I'm still having deep problems
picturing Fundy Royal switching allegiances--let alone to the NDP. In
fact, let us remember that the NDP's notional numbers and 'momentum'
may be inflated by their running the confusingly-named Rob Moir in
2006-8; whatever his credibility as a candidate (as affirmed by his
more-than-decent 2nd-place St. John's run in 2011), don't think Moir
didn't benefit here from mistaken identity, either. On those grounds,
I see the greater likelihood being Lib/NDP parity--either party by
itself being presently too weakly founded to prevail hereabouts--and
Moore-not-Moir prevailing in the resulting split. So, 'blue poison'
once again--and look at it this way, the Fundy Royals will vote blue
even if a competent-enough 'Mike Chong moderate' were federal leader.
15 09 01 Tony
71.7.250.207
Safe Conservative seat, they lose this then they're toast.
15 08 22 A. Voter
99.246.239.27
As of August 22, 308 gives the Conservatives an almost sixty percent
chance of winning this riding.
15 08 20 MUBS
207.236.24.137
It is not possible to know the 'percentage' of 308's percentage that
is influenced by regional polling but if this riding does not stay
cons then they are truly in trouble nationally.
15 08 20 Monkey Cheese
99.242.205.221
308 is now showing this as a 53% NDP gain, as of August 20. Who would
have thought? There does appear to be a downward trend for the Tories
in the Atlantic. It's enough for one of their last remaining
strongholds in the region to be in play. However, Rob Moore does have
the incumbent advantage, but the biggest question is how popular is he
in his own riding? Are enough people angry at the Conservatives to
vote him out? Conservative advantage, but this probably should be
moved to TCTC for now.
15 08 18 Craig Hubley
24.142.57.88
308 now has this as a 56% likely NDP pickup. Though the NDP is
supposedly just one point ahead two months before the election, the
other 1/4 of the vote that intends to hopelessly vote Liberal or Green
will be rethinking that. And it only takes a tiny portion of those
votes to defeat Rob Moore.
15 08 16 R.O.
24.146.23.226
Rob Moore has held this riding since 2004 and its one of the more tory
friendly ridings in New Brunswick. The ndp vote has gradually grown in
the riding and passed liberals for second. Rob Moore has the advantage
of being the incumbent and better known in riding than other main
candidates who haven't run here before.
15 08 12 Craig Hubley
96.30.183.72
308 has this as a marginal 56% Conservative hold, based on regional
polls of course and not necessarily taking into account the
incumbent's staying power. However Rob Moore is so closely identified
with the hard right wing of the Conservatives that anyone looking
seriously at the future of that party and wanting it to continue to
exist at all should consider not voting at all, or shifting Liberal to
start influencing the 'other right wing party' that will probably soon
be the only one capable of governing.
I usually bow to local wisdom but not to partisan predictions
necessarily. The fact is that in this election the public can choose
from two right-wing parties favouring C-51 and denying climate change,
a less denialist party that is still very pro-business and even
pro-Irving-oil, and the 308 numbers show that the NDP, not Liberals,
are the challenger. So all that means that the formerly rigid right
wing for Con vote is split.
15 08 05 Docere
69.156.79.184
What Craig Hubley does not seem to get in his attempt to paint all
ridings in the Maritimes with one brush (i.e. Peter MacKay is a former
PC and a Maritimer, since he's leaving Harper's Conservatives in
trouble in Fundy Royal, Tobique-Mactaquac etc.) is that rural New
Brunswick is a lot more right-wing than anything in neighboring Nova
Scotia. Fundy Royal will remain Conservative. It only went Liberal
once in its history - in 1993. In 2011, they only got 10% of the vote
in this riding! They are not in a position to win a seat like this. I
expect the Conservatives to be wiped out in Nova Scotia, but they
should have 3 or 4 seats in New Brunswick. EP's predictions are on the
mark here.
15 05 30 Craig Hubley
24.224.172.37
Changing my prediction after the departure of Peter MacKay. While this
will be one of the *LEAST* affected districts directly, and Nova
Scotia politics has basically no impact on it, the invigorated Liberal
focus on Maritime seats will certainly be felt here. And the departure
of MacKay is being understood and interpreted by most ordinary people
as meaning that the old PC Party no longer exists, no longer has any
role or status in the Conservative Party, and that the thing to do if
you ever want to moderate the Cons, is sit on your hands for Harper in
2015. Or join the Liberals, as Bill Casey has done.
So while I would not count Moore out, he is sure in the race of his life
now.
The biggest question is whether the provincial PCs of New Brunswick
are like the provincial PCs in Nova Scotia, and will realize that
Harper is their barrier to power, and that it becomes permanent if
Harper wins again. The last NB provincial election saw a huge rise in
the NDP and Green vote and another such rise of equivalent scale
pretty much forces the PCs and Liberals into a merger to hold power
for the usual NB elites and cronies.
Moore may end up sacrificed so that NB has no Harper/Alward hangover
for the third parties to use against the provincial PCs in the post
Harper era.
15 05 15
207.179.167.210
Rob Moore is a hard right winger, and a mindless drone. But that is
not going to matter any to the voters in Fundy Royal. A largely rural
riding with rich people who selfishly vote conservative so they can
keep more of their money, and country folk who think anyone else is a
communist... It pains me to say it, but I think Rob Moore will be here
until he retires, and he is only 41!
15 04 14 Dr. Bear
69.171.130.83
This seat would stay conservative, even if the liberals start polling
in majority territory. Both the Liberals and the CPC will be ignoring
this riding and focusing resources elsewhere.
15 03 28 monkey
174.114.31.13
Arguably one of the safest Tory ridings in Atlantic Canada so while I
expect the Liberals to do better than they normally do here, the
Tories would need a complete meltdown nationally to lose this. Lets
remember the Canadian Alliance got 25% here in 2000 so unlike other
Atlantic Canada ridings which are almost all old PC types thus could
go over to the Liberals, many here are from the Conservative base.
15 03 26 westnovascotian
134.190.174.82
One of the safest Conservative seats in Atlantic Canada. It would take
a monumental Conservative collapse or a major Trudeau surge for this
to switch.
15 03 24 phil03
209.195.123.27
As much that I would like to see Moore go down this is baptist country
and they love Harper and the tories. It is not completely impossible
to see it fall to the grits: it was in play last year when Trudeau
numbers where at their peaks and a combination of the the aftermath of
Duffy trials + a very rough budget for the maritimes might do the
trick but it is an uphill battle for anyone else then the
conservatives even in the best of circumstances.
15 03 22 Brian A
24.235.112.42
Rural New Brunswick. A region that typically favours the Conservatives
+ a province where the Conservatives are still doing quite well =
Conservative hold.
15 03 18 Craig Hubley
76.11.94.51
Another any-poison-as-long-as-its-blue riding held by Rob Moore, who
is presently Regional Minister for New Brunswick. and Newfoundland and
Labrador (because PEI and Nova Scotia would run him out on a rail
quick).
As with Valcourt, NB voters are wary of ditching an incumbent regional
minister (who hands out the goodies) or cabinet minister (who can get
the goodies handed out in Cabinet). An easy hold, one of the safest
Con in NB.
Moore ran for the Canadian Alliance in 2000 meaning he is probably one
of Harper's most reliable far right wing ideological allies in the
region. He defeated John Herron a refusenik PC who like Scott Brison
refused to join the Harper party.
By re-electing Moore and Valcourt, NB would keep its hands in both
sides of the Conservative Party of Canada and help to steer its future
evolution. And yes voters in this region really do think that way,
they know that their refusal to accept the Alliance in 2000 forced the
merger in which MacKay and Brison (both from Nova Scotia) were the key
players and in which Orchard (a Westerner) was fooled. In a situation
no Maritimer would have been fooled.
It's not clear yet whether Nova Scotia or New Brunsw...
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:34 PM
>>> Subject: Fwd: Here is my latest complaint about the SEC, Banksters
>>> and Taxmen
>>> To: jmwilson@mta.ca, alaina@alainalockhart.ca,
>>> stephanie.coburn@greenparty.ca
>>> Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://james4fundyroyal.
>>>
>>> https://alainalockhart.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> http://www.greenparty.ca/en/
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:16 PM
>>> Subject: Fwd: Here is my latest complaint about the SEC, Banksters
>>> and Taxmen
>>> To: Saint Croix Courier <editor@stcroixcourier.ca>, Duncan Matheson
>> <duncan@bissettmatheson.com>, infoacadie@radio-canada.ca
>>> Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>
>> https://player.fm/series/
>>> <
>>>
>> https://player.fm/series/
>>>>*
>>>
>>> Michelle LeBlanc, Vern Faulkner and Duncan Matheson look at the big
>>> political stories of the week. - See more at:
>>>
>> https://player.fm/series/
>>>
>>> https://twitter.com/mleblanc_
>>> Keep up with Duncan
>>>
>>> 506-457-1627
>>>
>>>
>>> *Editor:* Vern Faulkner
>>> Phone: (506) 466-3220 ext. 1307; CELL (506) 467-5203
>>> Email: editor@stcroixcourier.ca
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:18:04 -0300
>>> Subject: Fwd: Here is my latest complaint about the SEC, Banksters
>>> and Taxmen
>>> To: nicolas@allvotes.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, brendan@brendanmiles.ca
>>> Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Tim.Moen@libertarian.ca,
>>> info@
>>>
>>> ENJOY
>>>
>>> https://www.scribd.com/doc/
>>>
>>> https://www.scribd.com/doc/
>>>
This is first part of the text of the lawsuit
http://davidraymondamos3.
Friday, 18 September 2015
David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15
Court File No. T-1557-15
FEDERAL COURT
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Plaintiff
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
The Parties
1. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN (Crown) is Elizabeth II, the Queen of
England, the Protector of the Faith of the Church of England, the
longest reigning monarch of the United Kingdom and one of the
wealthiest persons in the world. Canada pays homage to the Queen
because she remained the Head of State and the Chief Executive Officer
of Canada after the Canada Act 1982 (U.K.) 1982, c. 11 came into force
on April 17, 1982. The standing of the Queen in Canada was explained
within the 2002 Annual Report FORM 18-K filed by Canada with the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). It states as
follows:
“The executive power of the federal Government is vested in the
Queen, represented by the Governor General, whose powers are exercised
on the advice of the federal Cabinet, which is responsible to the
House of Commons. The legislative branch at the federal level,
Parliament, consists of the Crown, the Senate and the House of
Commons.”
“The executive power in each province is vested in the Lieutenant
Governor, appointed by the Governor General on the advice of the
federal Cabinet. The Lieutenant Governor’s powers are exercised on the
advice of the provincial cabinet, which is responsible to the
legislative assembly. Each provincial legislature is composed of a
Lieutenant Governor and a legislative assembly made up of members
elected for a period of five years.”
2. Her Majesty the Queen is the named defendant pursuant to
sections 23(1) and 36 of the Crown Liability and Proceedings Act. Some
of the state actors whose duties and actions are at issue in this
action are the Prime Minister, Premiers, Governor General, Lieutenant
Governors, members of the Canadian Forces (CF), and Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP), federal and provincial Ministers of Public
Safety, Ministers of Justice, Ministers of Finance, Speakers, Clerks,
Sergeants-at-Arms and any other person acting as Aide-de-Camp
providing security within and around the House of Commons, the
legislative assemblies or acting as security for other federal,
provincial and municipal properties.
3. Her Majesty the Queen’s servants the RCMP whose mandate is to
serve and protect Canadian citizens and assist in the security of
parliamentary properties and the protection of public officials should
not deny a correspondence from a former Deputy Prime Minister who was
appointed to be Canada’s first Minister of Public Safety in order to
oversee the RCMP and their cohorts. The letter that helped to raise
the ire of a fellow Canadian citizen who had never voted in his life
to run for public office four times thus far is quoted as follows:
“Mr. David R. Amos
Jan 3rd, 2004
153Alvin Avenue
Milton, MA U.S.A. 02186
Dear Mr. Amos
Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to
my predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding
your safety.
I apologize for the delay in responding.
If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
suggest that you contact the police of local
jurisdiction. In addition, any
evidence of criminal activity should be brought to
their attention since the
police are in the best position to evaluate the
information and take action
as deemed appropriate.
I trust that this information is satisfactory.
Yours sincerely
A. Anne McLellan”
4. DAVID RAYMOND AMOS (Plaintiff), a Canadian Citizen and the
first Chief of the Amos Clan, was born in Sackville, New Brunswick
(NB) on July 17th, 1952.
5. The Plaintiff claims standing in this action as a citizen
whose human rights and democratic interests are to be protected by due
performance of the obligations of Canada’s public officials who are
either elected or appointed and all servants of the Crown whose
mandate is to secure the public safety, protect public interests and
to uphold and enforce the rule of law. The Crown affirms his right to
seek relief for offences to his rights under section 24(1) of the
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charter). Paragraphs 6 to 13
explain the delay in bringing this action before Federal Court and
paragraphs 25 to 88 explain this matter.
6. The Plaintiff states that pursuant to the democratic rights
found in Section 3 of the Charter he was a candidate in the elections
of the membership of the 38th and 39th Parliaments in the House of
Commons and a candidate in the elections of the memberships of the
legislative assemblies in Nova Scotia (NS) and NB in 2006.
7. The Plaintiff states that if he is successful in finding a
Chartered Accountant to audit his records as per the rules of
Elections Canada, he will attempt to become a candidate in the
election of the membership of the 42nd Parliament.
8. The Plaintiff states that beginning in January of 2002, he
made many members of the RCMP and many members of the corporate media
including employees of a Crown Corporation, the Canadian Broadcasting
Corporation (CBC) well aware of the reason why he planned to return to
Canada and become a candidate in the next federal election. In May of
2004, all members seated in the 37th Parliament before the writ was
dropped for the election of the 38th Parliament and several members of
the legislative assemblies of NB and Newfoundland and Labrador (NL)
knew the reason is the ongoing rampant public corruption. Evidence of
the Plaintiff’s concerns can be found within his documents that the
Office of the Governor General acknowledged were in its possession ten
years ago before the Speech from the Throne in 2004. The Governor
General’s letter is as follows:
“September 11th, 2004
Dear Mr. Amos,
On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne
Clarkson,
I acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and CD
regarding corruption,
one received from you directly, and the other forwarded to
us by the Office of
the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick.
I regret to inform you that the Governor
General cannot intervene in
matters that are the responsibility of elected officials
and courts of Justice of
Canada. You already contacted the various provincial
authorities regarding
your concerns, and these were the appropriate steps to take.
Yours sincerely.
Renee
Blanchet
Office
of the Secretary
to the
Governor General”
9. The Plaintiff states that the documents contain proof that the
Crown by way of the RCMP and the Minister of Public Safety/Deputy
Prime Minister knew that he was the whistleblower offering his
assistance to Maher Arar and his lawyers in the USA. The Governor
General acknowledged his concerns about the subject of this complaint
and affirmed that the proper provincial authorities were contacted but
ignored the Plaintiff’s faxes and email to the RCMP and the Solicitor
General in November of 2003 and his tracked US Mail to the Solicitor
General and the Commissioner of the RCMP by way of the Department of
Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) in December of 2003
and the response he received from the Minister of Public Safety/Deputy
Prime Minister in early 2004. One document was irrefutable proof that
there was no need whatsoever to create a Commission of Inquiry into
Maher Arar concerns at about the same point in time. That document is
a letter from the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Office
Inspector General (OIG complaint no. C04-01448) admitting contact with
his office on November 21, 2003 within days of the Plaintiff talking
to the office of Canada’s Solicitor General while he met with the US
Attorney General and one day after the former Attorney General of New
York (NY) and the former General Counsel of the SEC testified at a
public hearing before the US Senate Banking Committee about
investigations of the mutual fund industry.
10. The Plaintiff states that another document that the Plaintiff
received during the election of the 39th Parliament further supported
the fact he was a whistleblower about financial crimes. In December of
2006 a member of the RCMP was ethical enough to admit that he
understood the Plaintiff’s concerns and forwarded his response to the
acting Commissioner of the RCMP and others including a NB Cabinet
Minister Michael B. Murphy QC. The Crown is well aware that any member
sitting in the last days of the 37th Parliament through to the end of
the 41st Parliament could have stood in the House of Commons and asked
the Speaker if the Crown was aware of the Plaintiff’s actions. All
parliamentarians should have wondered why his concerns and that of Mr.
Arar’s were not heard by a committee within the House of Commons in
early 2004. Instead, the Crown created an expensive Commission to
delay the Arar matter while he sued the governments of Canada and the
USA and his wife ran in the election of the 38th Parliament. In 2007,
Arar received a $10-million settlement from the Crown and the Prime
Minister gave him an official apology yet the US government has never
admitted fault. A month after the writ was dropped for the election of
the 42nd Parliament and CBC is reporting Syrian concerns constantly,
Mr. Arar’s lawyer announced that the RCMP will attempt to extradite a
Syrian intelligence officer because it had laid a charge in absentia
and a Canada-wide warrant and Interpol notice were issued. The
Plaintiff considers such news to be politicking practiced by the
Minister of Public Safety. He noticed the usually outspoken Mr. Arar
made no comment but his politically active wife had lots to say on
CBC. Meanwhile, the RCMP continues to bar a fellow citizen from
parliamentary properties because he exercised the same democratic
rights after he had offered his support to Arar by way of his American
lawyers. The aforementioned letter about financial crimes was from the
Inspector General for Tax Administration in the US Department of the
Treasury. Mr Arar’s lawyers, the RCMP, the Canadian Revenue Agency and
the US Internal Revenue Service still refuse to even admit TIGTA
complaint no. 071-0512-0055-C exists. However, the Commissioner of
Federal Court, the Queen’s Privy Council Office and other agencies
were made well aware of it before the Speech from the Throne in 2006.
11. The Plaintiff states that from June 24, 2004 until the day he
signed this complaint he has diligently tried to resolve the breach of
his rights under the Charter that are the subject of this complaint
with any public official in Canada whom he believed had the mandate or
the ability to request that the Crown investigate and correct the
malicious actions and inactions of the RCMP, Sergeants-at-Arms and
Aides-de-Camp in all jurisdictions. Until June 16, 2006 the Plaintiff
did not have irrefutable proof to support this complaint. Time did not
permit him to address it immediately in Federal Court in 2006 because
his slate was full. For instance on June 16, 2006 while dealing with
deeply troubling private family matters, he was running against the
Attorney General for his seat in the NS provincial election while
arguing members of the RCMP about strange calls he got from someone in
Ottawa who claimed the Department of Public Safety as her client,
dealing with many liberal party members who were about to witness in
Moncton NB the first debate of all those who wished to become their
new leader, assisting a farmer in his attempt to get some authority to
properly investigate the demise of his cattle and discussing with
members of the Saint John NB City Council the actions of a sergeant in
the Saint John Police Force who was calling friends of the Plaintiff
and claiming that he was drug dealing member of a bike gang that they
should stay away from while he was preparing to intervene in pipeline
matter that was about to heard by the National Energy Board in Saint
John .
12. The Plaintiff states that in April of 2007 he wrote a complaint
about this matter and returned to the Capital District of NB in order
to file it and argue the Crown before the Federal Court if it did not
wish to settle. A clerk of this court informed him that his complaint
was not composed correctly, so he began to rewrite this complaint.
However, as soon as it was known what the Plaintiff was about to file
he was subject to further police harassment and his family began to
suffer from constant slander, sexual harassment and death threats on
the Internet and on the telephone that continues to this very day
while the RCMP, the FBI and many other law enforcement authorities
continue to ignored the obvious evidence of cybercrime practiced
against many people including his minor children.
13. The Plaintiff states that the Crown’s only response has been
further harassment by the RCMP including false arrest and imprisonment
and theft of his property by the Fredericton Police Force supported by
other law enforcement authorities in Canada and the USA. The Governor
General has had the Plaintiff’s documents for over ten years to study.
The Crown now has one of the complaints that the RCMP has been
delaying since 2003. It is as follows:
etc etc etc
I'm Dr Ogudugu, a real and genuine spell caster/Spiritual healer with years of experience in spell casting and an expert in all spells, i specialize exclusively in LOVE SPELL/GET REUNITE WITH EX LOVER, MONEY SPELL, POWERFUL MAGIC RING, ANY COURT CASES, FRUIT OF THE WOMB, HIV CURE, CURE FOR CANCER, HERPES, DIABETE, HERPERTITIS B, PARKINSON’S HERBAL CURE, BECOMING A MERMAID, BECOMING A VAMPIRE, SAVE CHILD BIRTH. They are all %100 Guaranteed QUICK Results, it most work. If you have any problem and you need a real and genuine spell caster to solve your problems, contact me now through my personal Email Address with problem case...Note-you can also Text/Call on WhatsApp.
ReplyDeleteContact me -
Email: greatogudugu@gmail.com
WhatsApp No: +27663492930