David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Hey After waiting all day for Walther Lauffer to call @DavidRayAmos (Yours Truly) back I called your office and was directed to send you an email??? Well @garyakmoore can Go Figure why that pissed me off
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/01/methinks-walther-lauffer-and-i-should.html
#nbpoli #cdnpoli
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fredericton-hotel-developer-hilton-garden-1.4987538
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/01/methinks-walther-lauffer-and-i-should.html
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fredericton-hotel-developer-hilton-garden-1.4987538
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Methinks Mayor Mikey and his cohorts have no idea who they are messing with I believe the Aquilini family can afford far more clever lawyers than the Trump Clan can N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/01/methinks-walther-lauffer-and-i-should.html
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fredericton-hotel-developer-hilton-garden-1.4987538
Hotel developer wants $250K back from Fredericton
Hilton Garden developer says it shouldn't be penalized for delays beyond its control
A hotel developer in Fredericton is
asking council to reconsider its decision to withhold a $250,000
performance bond because the new Hilton Garden Inn opened three months
late.
Aquilini Properties LP never completed the construction of the hotel on Queen Street on time. As a result, council voted to keep the money last fall.
Originally scheduled to open in the fall of 2017, Aquilini Properties LP was granted an extension by city council to finish the project by May 2018.
But the company didn't hit that deadline either — and didn't open until August.
Walther Lauffer, vice-president of Aquilini Properties LP, called council's decision to withhold the money a "slap in the face."
"We essentially delivered on the project."
Lauffer said this was an unusual project with circumstances out of their control, including 40 weeks of delays, which started with the demolition of the buildings on the site.
"Traditionally, you don't necessarily find, when you excavate, 18 archaeology finds that needed to be catalogued, and needed to be looked after. Obviously we did."
In January 2017, hotel construction came to a halt when a man was killed while he was working on the building.
At one point during construction, Lauffer said, the company had to replace the contractor on the project because it looked as if construction wasn't going to be ready in time.
And the historic flood in April 2018 delayed the project by at least two weeks, according to Lauffer.
Lauffer said he was surprised when council voted last fall to withhold the performance bond because the timelines were subject to adjustment based on a force majeure condition in the development
agreement — meaning factors that were beyond reasonable control of the developer.
"We had communication with the city, staff, council — that here's the reasons why we delayed."
Lauffer made his case at Monday night's council-in-committee meeting.
No decision was made during the meeting, and the mayor didn't indicate if they would have another vote, but said council would take Lauffer's presentation into consideration.
Coun. Bruce Grandy said during the meeting that given the reasons for the delays, council should give Aquilini Properties LP's concerns some consideration.
"When you're in the middle of a project and you change contractors, you know you're going to have delays and that other contractor has to get up to speed," Grandy said.
Grandy also pointed to projects that the city has done and failed to meet timelines, as an example.
"When
I look at our construction project on Regent and Queen, and it's
supposed to be done at a certain time, and we impacted business much
more than you [Aquilini Properties LP] did."
Lauffer said he doesn't know when he'll hear back from council it's too early to say if Aquilini Properties LP will consider legal action.
The company also owns the Crowne Plaza Fredericton-Lord Beaverbrook across the street from the Hilton Garden Inn.
Lauffer said he doesn't know how this will impact future developments in New Brunswick's capital city.
"I don't think a message like this needs to be talked about openly to other developers because obviously it would not be something that other developers would appreciate."
Aquilini Properties LP never completed the construction of the hotel on Queen Street on time. As a result, council voted to keep the money last fall.
Originally scheduled to open in the fall of 2017, Aquilini Properties LP was granted an extension by city council to finish the project by May 2018.
But the company didn't hit that deadline either — and didn't open until August.
Walther Lauffer, vice-president of Aquilini Properties LP, called council's decision to withhold the money a "slap in the face."
"We essentially delivered on the project."
An unusual project
Lauffer said this was an unusual project with circumstances out of their control, including 40 weeks of delays, which started with the demolition of the buildings on the site.
"Traditionally, you don't necessarily find, when you excavate, 18 archaeology finds that needed to be catalogued, and needed to be looked after. Obviously we did."
In January 2017, hotel construction came to a halt when a man was killed while he was working on the building.
At one point during construction, Lauffer said, the company had to replace the contractor on the project because it looked as if construction wasn't going to be ready in time.
Lauffer said he was surprised when council voted last fall to withhold the performance bond because the timelines were subject to adjustment based on a force majeure condition in the development
agreement — meaning factors that were beyond reasonable control of the developer.
"We had communication with the city, staff, council — that here's the reasons why we delayed."
No decision was made during the meeting, and the mayor didn't indicate if they would have another vote, but said council would take Lauffer's presentation into consideration.
Coun. Bruce Grandy said during the meeting that given the reasons for the delays, council should give Aquilini Properties LP's concerns some consideration.
"When you're in the middle of a project and you change contractors, you know you're going to have delays and that other contractor has to get up to speed," Grandy said.
Grandy also pointed to projects that the city has done and failed to meet timelines, as an example.
Lauffer said he doesn't know when he'll hear back from council it's too early to say if Aquilini Properties LP will consider legal action.
The company also owns the Crowne Plaza Fredericton-Lord Beaverbrook across the street from the Hilton Garden Inn.
Lauffer said he doesn't know how this will impact future developments in New Brunswick's capital city.
"I don't think a message like this needs to be talked about openly to other developers because obviously it would not be something that other developers would appreciate."
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
Samual Johnston
Commenting is now closed for this story.
Samual Johnston
The city has already given
this company far more than they should have to compete in an already
saturated market. cheap land - parking spaces and....???
David R. Amos
Methinks Fredericton Mayor Brad Woodside and his buddy Randy Dickinson sang different tunes not all that long ago when they sold the turf for a loonie N'esy Pas?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fredericton-hotel-deal-1.3269901
"People have asked us about spending the money because we have turned properties for $1, that's news for one day," Woodside said.
"The bigger news is when we start generating revenue, such as with the brewery over on the northside — that was an investment. All these things are investments."
Coun. Randy Dickinson was the only councillor who voted against the agreement on Tuesday.
"I have a problem in giving so much money to a private enterprise when we will not be owners of that facility, when we don't have money for hospice, we don't have money for homelessness, we don't have money for good transit services," Dickinson said.
"I think our priorities are a little out of whack."
Aquilini Properties is owned by the billionaire Aquilini family of Vancouver. The group also owns the Crowne Plaza across the street.
"We need development," Woodside said.
"We need a hotel."
Jonas Smith
Time for Grandy to get on the side of the City that he's a councilor for.......
David R. Amos
@Jonas Smith Methinks he may save the City a lot of money in legal fees N'esy Pas?
David R. Amos
Methinks Mayor Mikey and his cohorts have no idea who they are messing with I believe the Aquilini family can afford far more clever lawyers that the Trump Clan can N'esy Pas?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fredericton-withholds-money-1.4856453
"The City of Fredericton will be withholding a $250,000 performance bond from developer Aquilini Properties LP for its late completion of the Hilton Garden Inn, which opened in August.
At its regular council meeting on Tuesday night, city council voted unanimously to keep the money, which will go into the city's general fund.
"It helps our downtown, it helps our convention business, it helps bring more people to support our businesses," said Mayor Mike O'Brien."
David R. Amos
Methinks Walther Lauffer and I should talk ASAP N'esy Pas?
Les Cooper
John Montgomery
Harold Benson
DJ Redfern
Greg Smith
Dan Lee
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fredericton-hotel-deal-1.3269901
30 Commnents 3 years ago Here is one thread
Jan
Crowne Plaza Fredericton Lord Beaverbrook Hotel Re-Opens At Full Service
Francesco Aquilini (born 1969) is a Canadian businessman, investor, and philanthropist. He is the managing director of Vancouver-based Aquilini Investment Group,[1] the parent company of several diverse subsidiaries. The company is best known for its ownership of the Vancouver Canucks and Rogers Arena, where Aquilini sits as Chairman and NHL Governor.
His father, Luigi Aquilini, emigrated from Travagliato, Brescia, Italy, to Vancouver in 1953. He started Aquilini Investment Group in the 1960s and is still active in the company operations and decision making. Having come to Canada from Italy in the mid-1950s, Luigi started his own construction company, working in East Vancouver during the 1960s and 1970s. In the 1980s, he bought and sold older buildings in Vancouver, Ontario and Quebec. He then began buying land to build new condominium towers.[4] Francesco and his two brothers, Roberto and Paolo, began working in the company during the 1980s and are now all Managing Directors.
Aquilini Developments, in partnership with the Gaglardi family, is the proponent of the proposed $2.6B Garibaldi at Squamish resort. The planning and approvals from the project have dragged on since 1996 and community opposition to the project has steadily grown.[13] On March 23, 2010, the BC province stated that the proponents had failed to provide enough information to earn the project a passing grade.[14]
On August 17, 2012 the Vancouver Sun reported rumours that Aquilini was contemplating the acquisition of Abbotsford Entertainment and Sports Centre and the land it occupies.[15]
The company previously owned one of the largest rental complexes in Canada, the West Edmonton village.[20]
Francesco is the Chair and primary sponsor of the Italian Gardens (Il Giardino Italiano) in Hastings Park.[23] His company has given significant support to the BC Children's Hospital.[24][25] Francesco is also a regular participant and contributor to the Boys Club Network, which provides mentorship for at-risk young men in BC.[26]
The Aquilini Investment Group also supports land conservation and wildlife habitat protection, including contributing to the purchase of the Codd Wetlands in Pitt Meadows to protect the area.[27] Additionally, a 104 hectare site adjacent to Blaney Bog Regional Park was renamed the Aquilini Land Conservancy to recognize their significant financial contribution that helped permanently protect the area.[23]
Under the Canucks brand, Francesco has hosted many charity groups at Canucks games and supports a number of charitable organizations, including: the Canucks for Kids Fund,[28] to support childhood health and wellness, with specific programs aimed at issues like childhood diabetes;[28] the Canucks Autism Network (CAN), which provides adaptive sports, recreational, social and arts programs for children, teens and young adults living with autism in British Columbia;[28] and the Canuck Place Children’s Hospice, which provides care for sick children in BC.[28]
In his early 20s, Aquilini married Dusty Martel, then a local radio personality at CFMI. They had one child but were soon divorced.[29]
"Francesco Aquilini, Chairman & Governor, NHL", NHL.com.
"Francesco Aquilini Speaker at WVCC Breakfast March 14, 2007 | Heritage Law Blog". Bcheritagelaw.com. Retrieved 2016-10-27.
"The Breakaway Shot", BC Business, October 9, 2008.
Posted by COS Admin (2009-01-15). "2011 Recipient: Luigi Aquilini – Vancouver : Order of BC". Orderofbc.gov.bc.ca. Retrieved 2016-10-27.
Court feud yields a rare look into Canucks' backroom dealing By Ian Mulgrew. Vancouver Sun, B1. May 8, 2007.
"Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2015-02-14. Retrieved 2012-08-09.
"King Edward Village - King Edward Village Real Estate Information". Kingedwardvillage.ca. Retrieved 2016-10-27.
"Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2012-08-18. Retrieved 2012-08-09.
"HugeDomains.com - MaynardsBlock.com is for sale". Maynards Block. Retrieved 2016-10-27.
Canada (2012-07-15). "Rental units proposed for Rogers Arena - The Globe and Mail". M.theglobeandmail.com. Retrieved 2016-10-27.
"Vancouver developer buys Moncton properties - New Brunswick - CBC News". Cbc.ca. Retrieved 2016-10-27.
posted May 1, 2012 at 8:00 AM (2012-05-01). "Falls golf resort to be 'resurrected,' says Aquilini - Chilliwack Progress". Theprogress.com. Retrieved 2016-10-27.
"Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2008-04-11. Retrieved 2012-08-09.
Scott Simpson (2010-05-19). "$2.9 billion Garibaldi at Squamish ski and golf resort troubles regulators | Vancouver Sun". Blogs.vancouversun.com. Retrieved 2016-10-27.
"Fraser Valley abuzz that Vancouver Canucks owner has designs on Abbotsford hockey team, arena". Vancouversun.com. 2012-08-17. Retrieved 2016-10-27.
[1][dead link]
[2]
Richard L. Johnson. "Aquilini Group Properties LP Opens 210-suite Embassy Suites by Hilton® in Downtown Montréal / August 2007". Hotel-online.com. Retrieved 2016-10-27.
"Arrested development". Financialpost.com. Retrieved 2016-10-27.
[3][dead link]
"Golden Eagle Group". Geberries.com. Retrieved 2016-10-27.
Proposed facility irks local residents[permanent dead link], Castlegar News, August 18, 2009
"Vancouver Canucks Francesco Aquilini - Vancouver Canucks - Team". Canucks.nhl.com. 2007-05-22. Retrieved 2016-10-27.
"Layout 1" (PDF). Retrieved 2016-10-27.
http://www.bcchf.ca/assets/AboutUs/20102011AnnualReport.pdf
https://vancouversun.com/sports/Billionaire+Canucks+owner+Francesco+Aquilini+just+another+from+hood+with+video/8203944/story.html
http://www2.news.gov.bc.ca/archive/2001-2005/2004wlap0029-000448.htm
http://canucks.nhl.com/club/page.htm?id=39758
Published Wednesday, March 28, 2018 5:27PM PDT
(213) 620-8816 (fax) toliva@allenmatkins.com
His practice also covers land use litigation, including claims regarding compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and environmental litigation, including claims regarding soil and groundwater contamination and mold contamination, as well as claims regarding liability under various environmental statutes, including Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), Proposition 65 and California's asbestos notification laws. He has frequently litigated matters involving the enforcement of covenants, conditions and restrictions ("CC&R"s) including Homeowner Association view restrictors.
Tony frequently speaks on matters relating to real estate litigation. At the recent Convention of the State Bar of California, Tony was a featured speaker on "Remedies for Breach of Real Estate Purchase Agreements." He is also the co-chairman of the recent LSI Seminar entitled "Southern California Real Estate Litigation and Foreclosures."
David R. Amos
@David R. Amos It appears that he is a hard guy to talk to so I will call his boss later
Les Cooper
So how did this guy die?
Was it do to neglect of safety rules or just bad luck?
Was it do to neglect of safety rules or just bad luck?
David R. Amos
@Les Cooper That is not the issue of the article
John Montgomery
I don't believe we are really
hearing all the details here. They should be reimbursed for the
archeological finds...... provided those delays contributed to the fine
at all. The other things seem to be problems with construction that
should be the responsibility of the company doing the work.
David R. Amos
@John Montgomery YUP
Samual Johnston
@John Montgomery don't you
think they should have accounted for the possibility of archaeological
finds when diffing in a historic city? I say unless they did they
should not be reimbursed for anything.
Harold Benson
2 late. already spent.
David R. Amos
@Harold Benson No doubt
DJ Redfern
I wonder how many large
building projects the Mayor and councillors of Fredericton have been
involved in......and completed "on time"
David R. Amos
@DJ Redfern Me Too
Samual Johnston
@DJ Redfern I wonder how many performances bonds the city has tried to wiggle its way out of? guessing none...
Greg Smith
This company wants their
completion bonus after a supervisor was killed due to a fall from the
top floor? If they weren't shut down for over a month following this
lost time incident, they likely wouldn't have finished the project as
late. To then turn around and demand their completion bonus is
despicable.
David R. Amos
@Greg Smith Its not a bonus
Dan Lee
At one point during
construction, Lauffer said, the company had to replace the contractor on
the project because it looked as if construction wasn't going to be
ready in time
I would give them a % for the excavation but the rest NO...........suck it up and do your job on time.......
I would give them a % for the excavation but the rest NO...........suck it up and do your job on time.......
David R. Amos
@Dan Lee So you say
John Creaghan
"The finds may have delayed
us a little bit," said Walther Lauffer, vice president of hospitality
for Atlantic Canada at Aquilini Properties. "But we're still on track
for the build and hitting all our milestones." Delays were caused by
something other than archaeological finds. They were already given an
extension due to flood. City keeps the money.
David R. Amos
@John Creaghan We shall see about that
Don Julio
They already spent the money on cutting down trees in Officer's Square.
David R. Amos
@Don Julio YUP
Jason jeandron
Any time delays associated
with the archaeological work definitely should not be a part of the
consideration for fines. With so few projects in the City actually
following the provincial and municipal requirements, it would be
shameful for a project that is responsible, and looking out for our
heritage, be docked for their efforts.
David R. Amos
@Jason jeandron Its not a fine
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fredericton-withholds-money-1.4856453
Fredericton withholds $250,000 from hotel developer for late completion
Aquilini Properties LP was granted an extension by the city and still ended up finishing late
The
City of Fredericton will be withholding a $250,000 performance bond
from developer Aquilini Properties LP for its late completion of the
Hilton Garden Inn, which opened in August.
At its regular council meeting on Tuesday night, city council voted unanimously to keep the money, which will go into the city's general fund.
"It helps our downtown, it helps our convention business, it helps bring more people to support our businesses," said Mayor Mike O'Brien.
"By having it delayed a long time, it had a negative effect on all those issues."
However, as that date approached, Aquilini was still behind schedule.
In April 2018 Aquilini requested a second extension, which would have changed the completion date to Aug. 13. The city denied that request.
In
a letter to the city, Aquilini Properties cited unusual weather
conditions and changes in order to build "the next generation Hilton
Garden Inn prototype".
In the letter, Aquilini said the delays were already costing them $20,000 for each week the project went past its original completion date.
Due to the late closure, the company had to make arrangements with other hotels for people who had planned to stay at the Hilton Garden Inn in May for a convention.
But O'Brien replied, "that's business."
"A company like Aquilini would know what the potential risks are," said the mayor, adding the city invested far more than it's getting back from the performance bond.
At its regular council meeting on Tuesday night, city council voted unanimously to keep the money, which will go into the city's general fund.
"It helps our downtown, it helps our convention business, it helps bring more people to support our businesses," said Mayor Mike O'Brien.
"By having it delayed a long time, it had a negative effect on all those issues."
- Fredericton secures new downtown hotel with $2.2M deal
- Man dies in fall from 4th storey of Fredericton hotel under construction
- New hotel deal for downtown Fredericton doesn't please all
However, as that date approached, Aquilini was still behind schedule.
In April 2018 Aquilini requested a second extension, which would have changed the completion date to Aug. 13. The city denied that request.
In the letter, Aquilini said the delays were already costing them $20,000 for each week the project went past its original completion date.
Due to the late closure, the company had to make arrangements with other hotels for people who had planned to stay at the Hilton Garden Inn in May for a convention.
Downtown investment
While the vote to keep the money was unanimous, one councillor was conflicted on the decision. Coun. Bruce Grandy was worried it might discourage other developers looking to build in the city.- String of business closures in downtown Fredericton worries some owners
- Fredericton hopes turning Queen Street block to 2-way will ease congestion
But O'Brien replied, "that's business."
"A company like Aquilini would know what the potential risks are," said the mayor, adding the city invested far more than it's getting back from the performance bond.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fredericton-hotel-deal-1.3269901
Fredericton secures new downtown hotel with $2.2M deal
Coun. Randy Dickinson is lone vote against 8-storey, 120-room hotel deal with Aquilini Properites LP
Downtown Fredericton is getting a new
hotel after council approved an agreement between the city and Aquilini
Properties on Tuesday night.
The Hilton Garden Inn will be built beside the Convention Centre on Queen Street, a site the city bought for $800,000 three years ago, but sold to Aquilini for $1 as part of the hotel deal.
In total, the deal will cost the city about $2.2 million:
Despite all of the costs, the mayor said it is still a good deal for the city.
He
said the hotel will generate $140,000 in property taxes each year and
there will be about $160,000 in permits for the project.
The city also projects the hotel will add about $1 million a year to the local economy for the next 10 years.
"People have asked us about spending the money because we have turned properties for $1, that's news for one day," Woodside said.
"The bigger news is when we start generating revenue, such as with the brewery over on the northside — that was an investment. All these things are investments."
The billionaire Aquilini family is not new to New Brunswick hotel developments.
In 2012, the development company purchased property in downtown Moncton, next to the Crowne Plaza, which it also owns. The Aquilini family's property is next to Moncton's planned downtown sports and entertainment complex.
The Aquilinis also own the Vancouver Canucks.
Coun. Randy Dickinson was the only councillor who voted against the agreement on Tuesday.
"I think our priorities are a little out of whack."
Aquilini Properties is owned by the billionaire Aquilini family of Vancouver. The group also owns the Crowne Plaza across the street.
"We need development," Woodside said.
"We need a hotel."
The city has been trying to get a hotel on the site for several years, with previous deals falling through.
The hotel will be eight storeys, have 120 rooms, a small restaurant and bar and a pedway to the convention centre.
Woodside said council has seen the initial plans.
"What we've seen is very tasteful and it keeps in with the convention centre, it's almost like it's a part of it," he said.
Final plans will be released in November.
The hotel is expected to open by the end of 2017.
CBC's Journalistic Standards and PracticesThe Hilton Garden Inn will be built beside the Convention Centre on Queen Street, a site the city bought for $800,000 three years ago, but sold to Aquilini for $1 as part of the hotel deal.
In total, the deal will cost the city about $2.2 million:
- $800,000 the city paid for the property in 2012
- $700,000 the city will contribute for site development
- 60 free parking spaces in the east end garage for 10 years at a cost of about $72,000 a year.
Despite all of the costs, the mayor said it is still a good deal for the city.
"People have asked us about spending the money because we have turned properties for $1, that's news for one day," Woodside said.
"The bigger news is when we start generating revenue, such as with the brewery over on the northside — that was an investment. All these things are investments."
The billionaire Aquilini family is not new to New Brunswick hotel developments.
In 2012, the development company purchased property in downtown Moncton, next to the Crowne Plaza, which it also owns. The Aquilini family's property is next to Moncton's planned downtown sports and entertainment complex.
The Aquilinis also own the Vancouver Canucks.
Dickinson objects to funds for hotel
Coun. Randy Dickinson was the only councillor who voted against the agreement on Tuesday.
"I have a
problem in giving so much money to a private enterprise when we will not
be owners of that facility, when we don't have money for hospice, we
don't have money for homelessness, we don't have money for good transit
services," Dickinson said.
Aquilini Properties is owned by the billionaire Aquilini family of Vancouver. The group also owns the Crowne Plaza across the street.
"We need development," Woodside said.
"We need a hotel."
The city has been trying to get a hotel on the site for several years, with previous deals falling through.
The hotel will be eight storeys, have 120 rooms, a small restaurant and bar and a pedway to the convention centre.
Woodside said council has seen the initial plans.
"What we've seen is very tasteful and it keeps in with the convention centre, it's almost like it's a part of it," he said.
Final plans will be released in November.
The hotel is expected to open by the end of 2017.
30 Commnents 3 years ago Here is one thread
Jan
Come on guys, look on the
bright side: at least we're helping out billionaire families from the
west coast now instead of just the local one.
Also, before you start hating on the deal and think our elected geniuses got duped, you gotta remember that a guy worth billions probably can't be bothered to invest a few million extra of his own money..That's would just make him look silly and all the other billionaires would laugh at him.
Also, before you start hating on the deal and think our elected geniuses got duped, you gotta remember that a guy worth billions probably can't be bothered to invest a few million extra of his own money..That's would just make him look silly and all the other billionaires would laugh at him.
unmaskedwonder
@Jan how much is it going to
cost to build the hotel? all the construction labour and materials being
sourced locally. The land deal is all they are really getting out of
it, the city had to buy the adjacent properties when building the center
so the $1.5m is already done, the $72,000 per year parking is fake as
the spots are not used now. This is a good deal for the city, even the
property tax alone will be $1.4m over 10 years instead of an empty lot
making nothing....
Jan
@unmaskedwonder I don't know how people can support private companies getting handouts from governments.
The private company in question has the funds to build and buy everything themselves. I was raised to be self sufficient and take care of myself. These private companies prey on public money and get rich. Sure, we may all be dumb to support it but at least I can go to sleep at night knowing I'm not a rodent... maybe a rich rodent, but a rodent nevertheless.
And it's asinine that a province does not have money is handing out money to billionaires. They can bring out all the talking points about how in the long run it'll be beneficial but I think we've seen many times in this province that the only thing this benefits is the rodents.
The private company in question has the funds to build and buy everything themselves. I was raised to be self sufficient and take care of myself. These private companies prey on public money and get rich. Sure, we may all be dumb to support it but at least I can go to sleep at night knowing I'm not a rodent... maybe a rich rodent, but a rodent nevertheless.
And it's asinine that a province does not have money is handing out money to billionaires. They can bring out all the talking points about how in the long run it'll be beneficial but I think we've seen many times in this province that the only thing this benefits is the rodents.
tomkatt
@unmaskedwonder well if it s
such a money maker and a good deal for a private investor then surely
he would reconize what the property is worth? but why buy it when we
have folks like you who would give it away for nothing.
unmaskedwonder
@tomkatt it would not have
been bought either way, just sat empty. This creates jobs now and in the
future as well tax revenue the day construction starts. The $2.2m is
all figurative numbers, the city bought the land to build the center and
had to do the site work with the construction of the center so the
$1.5m is already been invested and unrecoverable, the land is not worth
$1.5m, at best the land could be sold for $500.000 which is comparable
to assessments close to the area. The $720,000 is $72,000 per year for
parking spaces that are not being used now, there is no way to say that
they would see any revenue from those spaces, so that money is
speculative. So the city really paid nothing for this deal, it just
helps the investor pitch the idea to the board.
tomkatt
@unmaskedwonder respect your
opinion but disagree. let the land sit there until you can sell it for
fair market value. the city is out nothing to wait.
Aquilini
Investment Group Completes Rebranding of Hotels in Frederiction
and Moncton to the Crowne Plaza Brand; Both Properties Managed by Pacrim Hospitality |
.
ATLANTA (March 9, 2006) –
InterContinental Hotels Group announced today the expansion of Crowne Plaza
Hotels & Resorts into the New Brunswick province of Canada. Fredericton,
N.B. welcomes its first Crowne Plaza hotel and will join its sister property,
the Crowne Plaza Moncton, N.B., which opened earlier this year.
“With the addition of two Crowne Plaza hotels in New Brunswick, our portfolio of upscale hotels in Canada continues to expand,” said Kevin Kowalski, vice president, brand management, Crowne Plaza Hotels & Resorts. “We look forward to providing our industry leading meetings service and a great night’s sleep via our Sleep Advantage program to our guests in Fredericton and Moncton.” “We are delighted to open New Brunswick’s first two Crowne Plaza hotels,” said Glenn Squires president, Pacrim Hospitality, the management company for both properties. “Both Fredericton and Moncton are ideal locations for a Crowne Plaza hotel—an upscale brand with a top-notch meetings program.” .
.
Formerly the Lord Beaverbrook Hotel, the 168-room property in Fredericton is situated downtown along the St. John River at 659 Queen St., Fredericton, N.B., within walking distance to the Garrison District, Lord Beaverbrook Art Gallery and the Playhouse. The hotel’s restaurant, the Terrace Dining Room offers upscale French cuisine, while casual dining is available in the James Joyce Pub. Formerly the Howard Johnson Plaza, the 191-room property in Moncton is located downtown at 1005 Main St., Moncton, N.B., just ten miles from the Moncton International Airport and close to shopping and attractions. The hotel’s restaurant, Top Deck offers a fresh seafood menu along with other American favorites. The Crowne Plaza Fredericton-Lord Beaverbrook and the Crowne Plaza Moncton-Downtown are owned by Aquilini Investment Group and managed by Pacrim Hospitality, under a license agreement with a company in the InterContinental Hotels Group.
Consistent with the Crowne Plaza
brand, both hotels offer a comprehensive meetings package to ensure a
seamless planning process and exceptional meeting experience consisting of
three key components: a Two-Hour Response Guarantee, Crowne Meetings Director
and a Meetings Daily Debrief. The Crowne Plaza Fredericton-Lord Beaverbrook
will have nearly 10,000 sq.-ft, of meeting space including two ballrooms, one
large meeting room and five boardrooms. The Crowne Plaza Moncton-Downtown
offers 14,000 sq.-ft. of meetings space, including a large ballroom and three
additional meeting rooms. Both are perfect venues for business meetings and
social functions.
The hotels feature the newly introduced Crowne Plaza Sleep Advantage which is available at all Crowne Plaza hotels in the U.S., Canada and Mexico. The Sleep Advantage encompasses the entire sleep experience, from training staff on how to create and maintain a restful environment to providing innovative products and services. Program components include new bedding, guaranteed wake-up calls, designated quiet zones, night lights, drape clips, sleep CDs, sleep tips and amenities such as eye masks, ear plugs and lavender spray. Guest room amenities at both properties include: air conditioning, voice mail, coffee maker, hair dryer, in-room safe, make-up mirror, complimentary high speed Internet access, iron and ironing board. Both hotels also offer complimentary parking, indoor pool and business center. The InterContinental Hotels Group portfolio in New Brunswick is represented by three of its brands, including the upscale, full service and limited service segments. InterContinental Hotels Group PLC of the United Kingdom [LON:IHG, NYSE:IHG (ADRs)] is the world's largest hotel group by number of rooms. InterContinental Hotels Group owns, manages, leases or franchises, through various subsidiaries, over 3,600 hotels and 537,000 guest rooms in nearly 100 countries and territories around the world. The Group owns a portfolio of well recognized and respected hotel brands including InterContinental® Hotels & Resorts, Crowne Plaza® Hotels & Resorts, Holiday Inn® Hotels and Resorts, Holiday Inn Express®, Staybridge Suites®, Candlewood Suites® and Hotel IndigoTM, and also manages the world's largest hotel loyalty program, Priority Club® Rewards. |
.
Contact:
Monica
Smith
Corporate Communications Coordinator InterContinental Hotels Group Three Ravinia Drive Suite 100 Atlanta, GA 30346 Tel: 770-604-5562 monica.smith@ichotelsgroup.com |
Crowne Plaza Fredericton Lord Beaverbrook Hotel Re-Opens At Full Service
FREDERICTON, NB, May 7 /CNW/ - A defining feature of the recently renovated Crowne Plaza Lord Beaverbrook Hotel in downtown Fredericton, New Brunswick is its close proximity to the majestic Saint John River. However that same scenic location is also squarely in the flood plain of the powerful river and this afternoon (May 07-2008) the hotel reopens at full service for the first time in seven days as the clean-up continues from record-breaking floods in New Brunswick's capital city. "It is a testament to the emergency efforts of the city and the province, the leadership of the hotel's management team and dedication of the staff that the Crowne Plaza Lord Beaverbrook reopens today, virtually free of any damage to guest related areas of the hotel," Glenn Squires, CEO of management company Pacrim Hospitality Services Inc. (PHSI) said today. Last Wednesday (April 30, 2008) 200 guests were evacuated from the hotel as flood waters reached record levels in Fredericton. "The initial concern for the hotel was our guests and their safety and comfort...yet once each was settled the 24-7 battle against relentless rising water became the focus of the Crowne Plaza team," Mr. Squires said. Even Prime Minister Steven Harper could not be accommodated when he traveled to view damage in the area. The hotel's General Manager Walther Lauffer and Regional Chief Engineer Ron Hebert lead the 'round the clock efforts of the staff of 120 people who kept guests and clients advised of the status of the closure and were determined to avoid significant property damage if at all possible. "In teams of 20, everyone from food and beverage and housekeeping staff to the sales team manned pumps and generators, moved furniture to higher ground and sand-bagged as required to ensure the Crowne Plaza is in a position to re-open today without any long-term damage to guests' comfort and services," GM Walter Lauffer said. All guest rooms, meeting areas, catering and dining area of the hotel have re-opened this afternoon. The new saltwater swimming pool will re-open tomorrow (Thursday) and the full service Arabesque Spa on Friday. "Even the parking lot, which spent days under 1.9 meters of water, has been cleared and swept." The hotel is owned by Aquilini Investments of Vancouver, British Columbia, "the principals of which have expressed their appreciation and admiration to the staff," Glenn Squires added. Mr. Lauffer indicated that working on-site; it was clearly the "amazing combined efforts" of the City of Fredericton, the provincial Environment Department, the Emergency Measures Organization (EMO) and NB Power that managed a dangerous and difficult situation. Pacrim Hospitality Services Inc. (www.pacrimhospitality.com) is one of Canada's largest, privately-owned hotel management companies with a portfolio of some 60 hotels throughout Canada and the United States totaling more than 6,000 hotel rooms and suites. Pacrim Hospitality is the preferred management company of Holloway Lodging REIT (www.hlreit.com) and is based in Halifax, Nova Scotia. Pacrim manages 19 hotels in Atlantic Canada, seven of them in New Brunswick.For further information:
For further information: Walther Lauffer, General Manager, Crowne Plaza Lord Beaverbrook Hotel, (506) 455-3371; Mike Jackson, President and C.O.O., PHSI, (902) 404-7474
Organization Profile
PACRIM HOSPITALITY SERVICES INC.
Canada’s Richest People: The Aquilini family
CB Staff
(Photo: Jonathan Hayward/CP)
By the end of last year, the Aquilinis saw their plans to build a
four-season ski resort at Garibaldi Mountain finally move forward. The
progress is a testament to the merits of making peace, which is what the
Aquilinis appear to have done with that other billionaire
Italian-Canadian developer clan in Vancouver, the Gaglardis. Seven years
ago, family frontman Francesco Aquilini was embroiled in a bitter
lawsuit with Tom Gaglardi and construction tycoon Ryan Beedie, who both
claimed they’d been wrongfully jilted out of a deal to purchase the
Vancouver Canucks from Seattle cellphone magnate John McCaw. Aquilini
prevailed in court, and Gaglardi was offered a consolation prize from
NHL commissioner Gary Bettman in the form of the Dallas Stars in 2011.
Fast-forward to today, and the Aquilini Investment Group stands shoulder
to shoulder with the Gaglardis’ Northland Properties in the joint
venture to construct the $5.2-billion Garibaldi at Squamish resort,
which would be the first greenfield ski hill built in Canada since 1980.
While the project is massive, it’s just one of the Aquilinis’ many high-profile, highly profitable ventures: Through Aquilini Investment Group, now more than 50 years old, the family controls one of British Columbia’s biggest development conglomerates, as well as its NHL team, the Rogers Arena, blueberry and cranberry farms, restaurants and some $80-million worth of vineyard properties in Washington state.
Updated Thursday, November 9, 2017
While the project is massive, it’s just one of the Aquilinis’ many high-profile, highly profitable ventures: Through Aquilini Investment Group, now more than 50 years old, the family controls one of British Columbia’s biggest development conglomerates, as well as its NHL team, the Rogers Arena, blueberry and cranberry farms, restaurants and some $80-million worth of vineyard properties in Washington state.
Updated Thursday, November 9, 2017
More Lists & Rankings:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francesco_Aquilini
Francesco Aquilini
A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. (December 2014) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
|
Francesco Aquilini
| |
---|---|
Born | 1969 (age 49–50)
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
|
Francesco Aquilini (born 1969) is a Canadian businessman, investor, and philanthropist. He is the managing director of Vancouver-based Aquilini Investment Group,[1] the parent company of several diverse subsidiaries. The company is best known for its ownership of the Vancouver Canucks and Rogers Arena, where Aquilini sits as Chairman and NHL Governor.
Early life and family business
Francesco Aquilini was born and raised in Vancouver, British Columbia.[2] Aquilini attended Templeton Secondary School. He went on to graduate from Simon Fraser University with a degree in Business Administration.[1][3] He later earned an MBA from UCLA.[1][3]His father, Luigi Aquilini, emigrated from Travagliato, Brescia, Italy, to Vancouver in 1953. He started Aquilini Investment Group in the 1960s and is still active in the company operations and decision making. Having come to Canada from Italy in the mid-1950s, Luigi started his own construction company, working in East Vancouver during the 1960s and 1970s. In the 1980s, he bought and sold older buildings in Vancouver, Ontario and Quebec. He then began buying land to build new condominium towers.[4] Francesco and his two brothers, Roberto and Paolo, began working in the company during the 1980s and are now all Managing Directors.
Aquilini Investment Group
Francesco, along with his brothers and father, oversees several subsidiaries:Vancouver Canucks and Rogers Arena
The Canucks is a professional ice hockey team based in Vancouver. On November 17, 2004, Aquilini purchased a 50% share in Orca Bay Sports and Entertainment (the owners of both the Canucks franchise and Rogers Arena) from John McCaw, Jr.[citation needed] On November 8, 2006, Aquilini purchased the remaining 50% of the Vancouver Canucks and Rogers Arena. In May 2007, Gaglardi and Beedie's civil lawsuit over Aquilini's purchase reached the Supreme Court of British Columbia. The court ruled for Aquilini, on January 10, 2008. The court held that there was no legal partnership between Aquilini, Beedie, and Gaglardi, and that McCaw was free to sell the team to anyone he wished.[5] Aquilini and Gaglardi knew each other from the many joint family events they had attended over the years. Their fathers (Luigi and Bob) were longtime friends and commercial allies. Both families are still majority partners in the proposed Garibaldi At Squamish resort north of Vancouver.[6]Aquilini Developments
Aquilini Developments, a division led by Dave Negrin, owns and develops real estate. The company is primarily focused on Vancouver and the Lower Mainland, but has holdings across Canada, in the US and Italy. Recent multi-storey residential developments in Vancouver include the King Edward Village,[7] Richards Living tower,[8] and Maynards Block.[9] The company has also built three residential towers around Rogers Arena.[10] Other recent acquisitions include an acre of land in downtown Moncton, NB [11] and a bankrupt golf course and commercial land in Chilliwack, BC.[12]Aquilini Developments, in partnership with the Gaglardi family, is the proponent of the proposed $2.6B Garibaldi at Squamish resort. The planning and approvals from the project have dragged on since 1996 and community opposition to the project has steadily grown.[13] On March 23, 2010, the BC province stated that the proponents had failed to provide enough information to earn the project a passing grade.[14]
On August 17, 2012 the Vancouver Sun reported rumours that Aquilini was contemplating the acquisition of Abbotsford Entertainment and Sports Centre and the land it occupies.[15]
Aquilini Properties
Aquilini Properties, managed by Don Turple, owns and manages hotels and other income-producing properties across Canada. Aquilini Properties owns five office towers across Canada[16] and has half ownership of Halifax-based Pacrim Hospitality Services, which owns and manages 30 hotels across Canada.[17] These include the Embassy Suites hotel in Montreal,[18] the Holiday Inn Express in East Vancouver, The division also owns all 48 Pizza Hut locations in BC.[19]The company previously owned one of the largest rental complexes in Canada, the West Edmonton village.[20]
Golden Eagle Group
Golden Eagle Group operates a variety of recreational and agricultural businesses within 5,000 acres (2,000 ha) of prime agricultural land. This is the single largest land holding in the Greater Vancouver Area. This includes two 18-hole golf courses, a western town movie set, real estate, and a 400-acre (160 ha) hardwood tree nursery. The Group also owns and manages one of the world’s larger blueberry and cranberry growing and processing operations.[21]Aquilini Renewable Energy
Aquilini Renewable Energy, led by John Negrin, is looking for opportunities in green energy, including waste-to-power and wind power.[3] The division earned community and media attention for a proposal in 2008 and 2009 to build a petroleum waste reduction and recycling plant near Christina Lake, a lake that is popular with summer vacationers.[22]Aquilini Brands
Aquilini Brands, led by Barry Olivier, was formed in October 2009. Bassano Hard Soda, the division's first consumer brand, is a vodka-based refreshment beverage inspired by classic Italian sodas. Bassano Hard Soda was launched in Canada in March 2011. Now, Jaw Drop cooler co. is its newest consumer brand, launching in Canada in 2012.Personal life and Philanthropy
Francesco is known for his philanthropic work in British Columbia, through both his personal contributions and the charitable organizations founded by his family through their various business ventures.Francesco is the Chair and primary sponsor of the Italian Gardens (Il Giardino Italiano) in Hastings Park.[23] His company has given significant support to the BC Children's Hospital.[24][25] Francesco is also a regular participant and contributor to the Boys Club Network, which provides mentorship for at-risk young men in BC.[26]
The Aquilini Investment Group also supports land conservation and wildlife habitat protection, including contributing to the purchase of the Codd Wetlands in Pitt Meadows to protect the area.[27] Additionally, a 104 hectare site adjacent to Blaney Bog Regional Park was renamed the Aquilini Land Conservancy to recognize their significant financial contribution that helped permanently protect the area.[23]
Under the Canucks brand, Francesco has hosted many charity groups at Canucks games and supports a number of charitable organizations, including: the Canucks for Kids Fund,[28] to support childhood health and wellness, with specific programs aimed at issues like childhood diabetes;[28] the Canucks Autism Network (CAN), which provides adaptive sports, recreational, social and arts programs for children, teens and young adults living with autism in British Columbia;[28] and the Canuck Place Children’s Hospice, which provides care for sick children in BC.[28]
In his early 20s, Aquilini married Dusty Martel, then a local radio personality at CFMI. They had one child but were soon divorced.[29]
See also
References
External links
https://bc.ctvnews.ca/neighbours-battle-over-aquilini-plans-for-beverly-hills-homes-1.3863518
Neighbours battle over Aquilini plans for Beverly Hills homes
David Molko, Senior Reporter, CTV Vancouver
Published Wednesday, March 28, 2018 5:27PM PDT
When Debbie Weiss moved to the end of Loma Linda Drive in Beverly
Hills, Calif. more than a decade ago, she hoped her tranquil piece of
paradise would stay that way for good.
“We really wanted quiet. We really wanted privacy. We wanted a view,” Weiss told CTV from her backyard, looking out over the hillside at the Pacific Ocean in the distance.
But all that changed in 2014, Weiss said, when she first learned B.C. developer and Vancouver Canucks’ owner Francesco Aquilini, planned to build right next door.
“When people say, ‘Do you live across from it?’ I surprisingly live across and next to it,” Weiss said, pointing as our camera pans from one end of her yard to the other, “because it’s wrapping around the whole end of the street.”
The early plans for the lots purchased by Aquilini through a trust in 2012 for over $7.2 million, according to Beverly Hills city records, called for a single cliffside home, in excess of 26,000 square feet—a house Weiss called a “monster.”
Early plans called for a single home exceeding 20,000 square feet. Neighbour Debbie Weiss paid for this rendering
That was 2014. Four years later, Aquilini’s lawyers say the project has gone through at least 10 versions to accommodate neighbours’ concerns and to comply with city requirements. The latest version splits the home into two separate houses. One is over 11,000 square feet including basement and garage space, and the other just over 8,000.
Aquilini’s lawyers with Allen Matkins provided CTV with this updated 2018 rendering.
Weiss says her concerns, which include her privacy, the integrity of the hillside, along with construction traffic and exhaust, haven’t changed.
“It’s basically changing the character of our street forever. Once this hillside’s gone, it’s gone forever,” she said, calling the project "wildly out of scale" and "wildly out of character."
Ronald Richards, a neighbour and lawyer who lives one street over in one of America’s wealthiest postal codes and has been closely following the project, has dubbed the latest version the “Starship Enterprise” on the hill.
Neighbour Ronald Richards refers to this rendering of the Aquilini property, commissioned by neighbour Debbie Weiss in 2017, as “Starship Enterprise.”
“I just think this is a spec house,” Richards said. “And ultimately, it’s going to be like everything. It’s all about the money… Mr. Aquilini is just some guy in Canada that’s just writing cheques.”
When contacted by CTV News, Aquilini’s lawyers declined to make their client available for an interview, and instead provided written responses to CTV’s questions.
“The two homes are not ‘wildly out of scale’ in any respect,” wrote Tony Oliva, a partner with Allen Matkins, responding to Weiss’ concerns. He added that the homes are “absolutely not ‘changing the character of the street forever.’”
Oliva pointed to a number of homes in the neighbourhood that are “the same size or larger” than the smaller of the two proposed Aquilini properties, and indicated a circular home located on the same street “dispels any notion that the two homes are out of character with the rest of the street.”
Aquilini’s lawyer also revealed that his client has always intended to live in at least one of the homes.
“It is hard to describe this as [his] ‘dream home’ given the animosity and personal attacks he has encountered from the opponents over the past several years,” Oliva wrote.
According to Debbie Weiss, who says she met Aquilini three times, he was always “very pleasant, very charming” but not receptive enough, she says, to addressing her concerns.
Weiss recalled Aquilini’s reaction following a city council meeting in December 2014 after it became clear he would need to make changes to the plans in order to get approval for building permits.
“He kind of turned to me and was like ‘Congratulations,’ like I had bested him in a hockey game,” Weiss said. “Maybe he thought he could just come in and get everything he wanted.”
Aquilini’s lawyers say he and his team have worked through and responded to each and every concern relayed by those who oppose the project.
“Alas, none of our good faith efforts to appease the neighbours have been well-received,” Oliva wrote.
Weiss says she’s personally spent 6,000 hours and over US$300,000 “defending her home.”
According to city planner Ryan Gohlich, the larger of the two homes may soon be eligible for a building permit. City records also indicate the smaller of the two has a number of outstanding issues under dispute.
When asked what Aquilini could do now to help assuage her concerns and achieve a compromise,
Weiss responded: “Be a genuine good neighbour. Really solve it. Don’t just throw crumbs at them.”
“We really wanted quiet. We really wanted privacy. We wanted a view,” Weiss told CTV from her backyard, looking out over the hillside at the Pacific Ocean in the distance.
But all that changed in 2014, Weiss said, when she first learned B.C. developer and Vancouver Canucks’ owner Francesco Aquilini, planned to build right next door.
“When people say, ‘Do you live across from it?’ I surprisingly live across and next to it,” Weiss said, pointing as our camera pans from one end of her yard to the other, “because it’s wrapping around the whole end of the street.”
The early plans for the lots purchased by Aquilini through a trust in 2012 for over $7.2 million, according to Beverly Hills city records, called for a single cliffside home, in excess of 26,000 square feet—a house Weiss called a “monster.”
Early plans called for a single home exceeding 20,000 square feet. Neighbour Debbie Weiss paid for this rendering
That was 2014. Four years later, Aquilini’s lawyers say the project has gone through at least 10 versions to accommodate neighbours’ concerns and to comply with city requirements. The latest version splits the home into two separate houses. One is over 11,000 square feet including basement and garage space, and the other just over 8,000.
Aquilini’s lawyers with Allen Matkins provided CTV with this updated 2018 rendering.
Weiss says her concerns, which include her privacy, the integrity of the hillside, along with construction traffic and exhaust, haven’t changed.
“It’s basically changing the character of our street forever. Once this hillside’s gone, it’s gone forever,” she said, calling the project "wildly out of scale" and "wildly out of character."
Ronald Richards, a neighbour and lawyer who lives one street over in one of America’s wealthiest postal codes and has been closely following the project, has dubbed the latest version the “Starship Enterprise” on the hill.
Neighbour Ronald Richards refers to this rendering of the Aquilini property, commissioned by neighbour Debbie Weiss in 2017, as “Starship Enterprise.”
“I just think this is a spec house,” Richards said. “And ultimately, it’s going to be like everything. It’s all about the money… Mr. Aquilini is just some guy in Canada that’s just writing cheques.”
When contacted by CTV News, Aquilini’s lawyers declined to make their client available for an interview, and instead provided written responses to CTV’s questions.
“The two homes are not ‘wildly out of scale’ in any respect,” wrote Tony Oliva, a partner with Allen Matkins, responding to Weiss’ concerns. He added that the homes are “absolutely not ‘changing the character of the street forever.’”
Oliva pointed to a number of homes in the neighbourhood that are “the same size or larger” than the smaller of the two proposed Aquilini properties, and indicated a circular home located on the same street “dispels any notion that the two homes are out of character with the rest of the street.”
Aquilini’s lawyer also revealed that his client has always intended to live in at least one of the homes.
“It is hard to describe this as [his] ‘dream home’ given the animosity and personal attacks he has encountered from the opponents over the past several years,” Oliva wrote.
According to Debbie Weiss, who says she met Aquilini three times, he was always “very pleasant, very charming” but not receptive enough, she says, to addressing her concerns.
Weiss recalled Aquilini’s reaction following a city council meeting in December 2014 after it became clear he would need to make changes to the plans in order to get approval for building permits.
“He kind of turned to me and was like ‘Congratulations,’ like I had bested him in a hockey game,” Weiss said. “Maybe he thought he could just come in and get everything he wanted.”
Aquilini’s lawyers say he and his team have worked through and responded to each and every concern relayed by those who oppose the project.
“Alas, none of our good faith efforts to appease the neighbours have been well-received,” Oliva wrote.
Weiss says she’s personally spent 6,000 hours and over US$300,000 “defending her home.”
According to city planner Ryan Gohlich, the larger of the two homes may soon be eligible for a building permit. City records also indicate the smaller of the two has a number of outstanding issues under dispute.
When asked what Aquilini could do now to help assuage her concerns and achieve a compromise,
Weiss responded: “Be a genuine good neighbour. Really solve it. Don’t just throw crumbs at them.”
https://www.allenmatkins.com/Professionals/Oliva-Anthony/Biography.aspx
Anthony J. Oliva
Partner
Los Angeles
(213) 955-5626(213) 620-8816 (fax) toliva@allenmatkins.com
Anthony J. Oliva is a partner in our Los Angeles office and is Director of the Litigation Department. His practice focuses on commercial litigation, with an emphasis on real estate litigation. Tony represents owners, developers, purchasers, sellers, lessors and lessees of commercial properties in litigation regarding interpretation and enforcement of a variety of real estate contracts, including purchase and sale agreements, option agreements, leases, sale-leasebacks, and development agreements. His practice often involves the pursuit or defense of specialized real-estate related remedies including specific performance and mandamus. He also represents owners of commercial real estate in connection with direct condemnation claims and inverse condemnation matters, including regulatory takings. He represents participants in real estate partnerships and joint ventures in litigation regarding the interpretation and enforcement of partnership and joint venture agreements.
His practice also covers land use litigation, including claims regarding compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and environmental litigation, including claims regarding soil and groundwater contamination and mold contamination, as well as claims regarding liability under various environmental statutes, including Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), Proposition 65 and California's asbestos notification laws. He has frequently litigated matters involving the enforcement of covenants, conditions and restrictions ("CC&R"s) including Homeowner Association view restrictors.
Tony frequently speaks on matters relating to real estate litigation. At the recent Convention of the State Bar of California, Tony was a featured speaker on "Remedies for Breach of Real Estate Purchase Agreements." He is also the co-chairman of the recent LSI Seminar entitled "Southern California Real Estate Litigation and Foreclosures."
Memberships
- Los Angeles County Bar Association
- American Bar Association
Accolades
Education
Tony graduated from Princeton University with a B.A., cum laude, in politics in 1982 and received his J.D. from University of California, Berkeley, School of Law at Boalt Hall in 1985.Bar Admissions
- California
- Connecticut
- Florida
Thank you
-------------------
Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
Vancouver Granville.
Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
votre adresse et votre code postal.
Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.
Merci
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Barry, Clare" <Clare.Barry@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:37:23 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Facing a divided province, a non-profit
strives for 'social cohesion' in New Brunswick ??? YEA RIGHT
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Je serai absente du bureau entre le 27 decembre et le 2 janvier. Dans
mon absence, veuillez contactez Sam Boorman ou Melissa Chan dans le
bureau regional.
I will be away from the office from December 27, 2018 to January 2,
2019. In my absence, kindly contact Sam Boorman or Melissa Chan of the
Atlantic Regional Office.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Jensen, Jan" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:37:23 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Facing a divided province, a non-profit
strives for 'social cohesion' in New Brunswick ??? YEA RIGHT
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I will be away from the office and not returning until Tuesday
December 27th, 2018. If you require immediate assistance, please
contact my assistant at (902) 407 7461.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:37:57 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Facing a divided province, a non-profit
strives for 'social cohesion' in New Brunswick ??? YEA RIGHT
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Please be advised that the Constituency Office of Bill Blair will be
closed from December 24th to January 1st. The office will re-open on
January 2nd, 2019. During this time I will have limited access to
email.
Merry Christmas, Happy Holidays and all the best for 2019.
Sincerely,
Jessica Bozzo
---------- Original message ----------
From: Justice Minister <JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:37:27 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Facing a divided province, a non-profit
strives for 'social cohesion' in New Brunswick ??? YEA RIGHT
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email to the Minister of Justice. Please be assured
that it has been received by the Department. Your email will be
reviewed and addressed accordingly. Thank you.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 22:02:31 -0400
Subject: YO Brenda Lucki You know as well as I that the Civilian
Review and Complaints Commission has not done anything ethical since
we crossed paths in 2003 and obviously never will
To: daniel.gosselin@cas-satj.gc.ca
Bruce.Preston@cas-satj.gc.ca, Beatriz.Winter@cas-satj.gc.ca,
Gib.vanErt@scc-csc.ca, marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca,
Lorri.Warner@justice.gc.ca, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca,
bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca, Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca,
Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
Clare.Barry@justice.gc.ca, David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca,
Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, liliana.longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,
maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca, "Michael.Wernick"
<Michael.Wernick@pco-bcp.gc.ca
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "Gilles.Blinn"
<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Larry.Tremblay"
<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "David.Raymond.Amos"
<David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com>
- Hide quoted text -
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Complaints <complaints@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 17:56:32 +0000
Subject: Civilian Review and Complaints Commission 2018-2861 David Amos
To: "david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
David Amos:
Please see the attached letter regarding your complaint against the RCMP.
Intake Office, Operations
Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the RCMP / Government of Canada
complaints@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca<
1-800-665-6878 / TTY: 1-866-432-5827/
www.crcc-ccetp.gc.ca/en/make-
Bureau de réception des plaintes, Opérations
Commission civile d'examen et de traitement des plaintes relatives à
la GRC / Gouvernement du Canada
plaintes@crcc-ccetp.gc.ca<
1-800-665-6878 / ATS : 1-866-432-5827/
www.crcc-ccetp.gc.ca/fr/depot-
[crcc-email-block]
http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
"Harper, Stephen - M.P." Harper.S@parl.gc.ca wrote:
Subject: RE: Re: Lets all go through the looking glass to check the
Integrity of the Talking Heads in BC tonight
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:32:54 -0500
From: "Harper, Stephen - M.P." Harper.S@parl.gc.ca
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Thank you for your e-mail message to Stephen Harper, Leader of the
Opposition. Your views and suggestions are important to us. Once they
have been carefully considered, you may receive a further reply.
*Remember to include your mailing address if you would like a response.
If you prefer to send your thoughts by regular mail, please address them to:
Stephen Harper, M.P.
Leader of the Opposition
House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6
Mail may be sent postage free to any Member of Parliament.
You can also reach Mr. Harper by fax at: (613) 947-0310
Martin Demands That Harper Must Come Clean on Notwithstanding Clause
by LPC Friday, 16 December 2005
Prime Minister Paul Martin demanded Conservative Leader Stephen Harper
come clean that he intends to use the notwithstanding clause to
overturn the Charter right to same-sex marriage.
Mr. Harper said during tonight’s leader’s debate in Vancouver on the
topic of abolishing same-sex marriage: "I will never use the
notwithstanding clause on that issue."
Prime Minister Martin asked that he be honest with the Canadian people
regarding his intention to override a Charter right.
"We're talking about integrity. That means being honest. Either Mr.
Harper is going to try to change the law of the country that protects
the rights and freedoms of gays and lesbians or he's not going to,"
said Prime Minister Martin.
"If he's going to use the notwithstanding clause, he should say so,
and the people will at least know what his position is."
The Prime Minister said Mr. Harper’s proposal would require the use of
the notwithstanding clause because it is not possible to have a vote
in the house that will overrule the Constitution and the courts
without using the notwithstanding clause.
This is borne out by a January 25 open letter from more than 100 legal
experts from across Canada to Mr. Harper regarding same-sex marriage
legislation.
Mr. Martin called on Mr. Harper to be "honest."
He made clear that the Liberal government does not believe that you
can pick and choose which Charter rights you will protect and he
affirmed that he will respect the Charter as a whole.
The Prime Minister said Mr. Harper’s proposal would require the use of
the notwithstanding clause because it is not possible to have a vote
in the house that will overrule the Constitution and the courts
without using the notwithstanding clause.
This is borne out by a January 25 open letter from more than 100 legal
experts from across Canada to Mr. Harper regarding same-sex marriage
legislation.
Mr. Martin called on Mr. Harper to be "honest."
He made clear that the Liberal government does not believe that you
can pick and choose which Charter rights you will protect and he
affirmed that he will respect the Charter as a whole.
On 12/12/18, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://davidraymondamos3.
>
> Wednesday, 12 December 2018
>
> The latest Public Safety Minister Carl Urquhart yesterday the RCMP and
> many lawyers know Fat Fred City and the province are about to get sued
> BIGTIME
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Gallant, Brian (LEG)" <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 17:48:50 +0000
> Subject: RE: YO Deputy Premier Robert Gauvin Enjoy
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for writing to the Leader of the Official Opposition of New
> Brunswick. Please be assured that your e-mail will be reviewed.
>
> If this is a media request, please forward your e-mail to
> ashley.beaudin@gnb.ca
>
> ---
>
> Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le chef de l’opposition
> officielle du Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel
> sera examiné.
>
> Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à
> ashley.beaudin@gnb.ca
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
> <Premier@ontario.ca>
> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 17:48:28 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: YO Deputy Premier Robert Gauvin Enjoy
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
> valued.
>
> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>
> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
> response may take several business days.
>
> Thanks again for your email.
> ______
>
> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>
> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>
> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>
> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Gauvin, Serge (SNB)" <Serge.Gauvin@snb.ca>
> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 17:48:49 +0000
> Subject: Réponse automatique : YO Deputy Premier Robert Gauvin Enjoy
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I am out of the office. Please contact Patrick Windle at
> patrick.windle@snb.ca
>
> Je suis absent du bureau. Veuillez contacter Patrick Windle à
> patrick.windle@snb.ca
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Cormier, Donna (JAG/JPG)" <donna.cormier@gnb.ca>
> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 20:15:11 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Yp John Logan I just called
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I'm away from the office until December 12, 2018. Should your matter
> require immediate attention, please contact Susan Butler at (506)
> 453-6309.
>
> Je suis à l'extérieur du bureau jusqu'au 12 décembre 2018. Si votre
> matière est urgente, veuillez communiquer avec Susan Butler au (506)
> 453-6309.
>
> Merci / Thank you
> Donna Cormier
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 15:49:18 -0400
> Subject: Yp John Logan I just called
> To: donna.cormier@gnb.ca, John.Logan@gnb.ca
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 02:04:52 -0400
> Subject: So Much for the Strong Ethics of the Strong Organization
> commonnly knows as the RCMP/GRC N'esy Pas?
> To: Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
> <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
> <mike.holland@gnb.ca>, "Mitton, Megan (LEG)" <megan.mitton@gnb.ca>,
> "carl.urquhart" <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, "Stephane.vaillancourt"
> <Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-
> <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, "Gilles.Blinn"
> <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Michelle.Boutin"
> <Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.
> <michelle.conroy@gnb.ca>, "michael.comeau" <michael.comeau@gnb.ca>,
> "Norman.Sabourin" <Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca
> <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, "maxime.bernier"
> <maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
> <Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Cote" <Gilles.Cote@gnb.ca>,
> "gerry.lowe" <gerry.lowe@gnb.ca>, "Gerald.Butts"
> <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Michael.Wernick"
> <Michael.Wernick@pco-bcp.gc.ca
> <Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "dale.drummond"
> <dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> ddale <ddale@thestar.ca>, sfine <sfine@globeandmail.com>
> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: ethics-ethique ethics-ethique <ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:22:30 -0500
> Subject: Re: Re My many calls to the Calgary Police Dept about their
> client Partick Doran and his many cohorts
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> This will confirm that we have received your enquiry and it has been
> placed in a priority sequence.
> ******************************
> La présente confirme que nous avons bien reçu votre requête et qu'elle
> a été placée en ordre de priorité de réception.
>
> Thank you/Merci
>
> Professional Ethics Office / Bureau de l'éthique professionelle
> Royal Canadian Mounted Police / Gendarmerie royale du Canada
> 73 Leikin Dr., M5-3-101
> RCMP Mailstop #58/
> GRC Arrêt Postal #58
> Ottawa, Ontario
> K1A 0R2
>
> 1-866-206-0195 (off/bur)
>
> ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> "Strong Ethics, Strong Organization"
> « Une éthique solide pour une organisation solide »
>
> This document is the property of the Government of Canada. It is
> loaned, in confidence, to your agency only and is not to be
> reclassified or further disseminated without the consent of the
> originator."
>
> « Ce document appartient au gouvernement du Canada. Il n'est transmis
> en confidence qu'à votre organisme et il ne doit pas être reclassifié
> ou transmis à d'autres sans le consentement de l'expéditeur. »
>
>
>
>
>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Good Day Sir
>>
>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>
>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>
>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>> suggested that you study closely.
>>
>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>
>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>
>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>>
>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>>
>> April 3rd, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/
>>
>>
>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>
>>
>> The only hearing thus far
>>
>> May 24th, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/
>>
>>
>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>
>> Date: 20151223
>>
>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>
>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>
>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>
>> Plaintiff
>>
>> and
>>
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>> Defendant
>>
>> ORDER
>>
>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>> December 14, 2015)
>>
>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>> in its entirety.
>>
>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>> he stated:
>>
>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>
>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>> Police.
>>
>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>
>>
>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>> is no order as to costs.
>>
>> “B. Richard Bell”
>> Judge
>>
>>
>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>
>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>
>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>> most
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>> dudes are way past too late
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Merci ,
>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>
>>
>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>
>> January 13, 2015
>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>
>> December 8, 2014
>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>
>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>
>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>
>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>> campaign of 2006.
>>
>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>
>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>
>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>
>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>
>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>
>> Subject:
>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>
>> January 30, 2007
>>
>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>
>> Mr. David Amos
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>
>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>
>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>> Minister of Health
>>
>> CM/cb
>>
>>
>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>
>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>
>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>
>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>
>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>
>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>> Traffic Services NCO
>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>>
>>
>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>> fax: 506-444-5224
>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Mr. Amos,
> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>
> Department of Justice
>
> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.
>> ilian.html
>>
>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>>
>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>
>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>> cards?
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>> 6
>>>
>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>> United States Senate
>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>
>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>> tapes.
>>>
>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>
>>> Very truly yours,
>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>
>>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>
>
> Sunday, 19 November 2017
> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
> The Supreme Court
>
> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.
>
>
> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>
> Amos v. Canada
> Court (s) Database
>
> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
> Date
>
> 2017-10-30
> Neutral citation
>
> 2017 FCA 213
> File numbers
>
> A-48-16
> Date: 20171030
>
> Docket: A-48-16
> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
> CORAM:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
>
> BETWEEN:
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
> Respondent on the cross-appeal
> (and formally Appellant)
> and
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
> Appellant on the cross-appeal
> (and formerly Respondent)
> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>
> THE COURT
>
>
>
> Date: 20171030
>
> Docket: A-48-16
> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
> CORAM:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
>
> BETWEEN:
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
> Respondent on the cross-appeal
> (and formally Appellant)
> and
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
> Appellant on the cross-appeal
> (and formerly Respondent)
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>
> I. Introduction
>
> [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
> (Claim at para. 96).
>
> [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
> Prothontary’s Order).
>
>
> [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>
>
> [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
> cross-appeal.
>
>
> II. Preliminary Matter
>
> [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
> several judges but did not name those judges.
>
> [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
> c. F-7:
>
>
> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
> Appeal.
> […]
>
> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
> […]
> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>
> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>
>
> [7] However, these subsections only provide that the
> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
> section.
> [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>
> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
> matière civile et pénale.
> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>
> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>
>
> [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
> appeal book.
>
>
> [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
> conflict in any matter related to him.
>
>
> [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>
>
> [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
> such judge had a conflict.
>
>
> [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
> was a member of such firm.
>
>
> [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>
>
> [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
> [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
> apprehension of bias:
> 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
> reasonable apprehension of bias:
> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>
> [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
> (4th) 193).
>
> [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
> 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>
>
> 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>
>
> 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>
>
> 30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
> To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
> 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>
>
> 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
> events from over a decade ago.
> (emphasis added)
>
> [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
> Webb hearing this appeal.
>
> [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>
> [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>
> [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>
> [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
> to recuse himself.
>
> [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>
> [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>
>
> III. Issue
>
> [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>
> IV. Analysis
>
> A. Standard of Review
>
> [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>
> [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
> interfere.
>
>
> B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
> Prothonotary’s Order?
>
> [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>
> 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
> (…)
>
>
> 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
> [footnotes omitted].
>
>
> [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
> para. 27).
>
>
> [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>
>
> [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>
> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>
> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>
> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>
> [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>
> [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>
> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
> of process…
>
> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>
> [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>
> [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
> supporting a cause of action.
>
> [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>
> V. Conclusion
> [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
> without leave to amend.
> "Wyman W. Webb"
> J.A.
> "David G. Near"
> J.A.
> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
> J.A.
>
>
>
> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>
> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
> DOCKET:
>
> A-48-16
>
>
>
> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
>
>
> PLACE OF HEARING:
>
> Fredericton,
> New Brunswick
>
> DATE OF HEARING:
>
> May 24, 2017
>
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
> DATED:
>
> October 30, 2017
>
> APPEARANCES:
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
> (on his own behalf)
>
> Jan Jensen
>
>
> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>
> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
> Nathalie G. Drouin
> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>
> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>
>>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Kulik, John" <john.kulik@mcinnescooper.com>
>> Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 17:37:49 +0000
>> Subject: McInnes Cooper
>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
>> "david.raymond.amos@gmail.com" <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>
>> I am General Counsel for McInnes Cooper. If you need to communicate
>> with our firm, please do so through me.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> John Kulik
>> [McInnes Cooper]<http://www.
>>
>> John Kulik Q.C.
>> Partner & General Counsel
>> McInnes Cooper
>>
>> tel +1 (902) 444 8571 | fax +1 (902) 425 6350
>>
>> 1969 Upper Water Street
>> Suite 1300
>> Purdy's Wharf Tower II Halifax, NS, B3J 2V1
>>
>> asst Cathy Ohlhausen | +1 (902) 455 8215
>>
>>
>>
>> Notice This communication, including any attachments, is confidential
>> and may be protected by solicitor/client privilege. It is intended
>> only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you have
>> received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by e-mail or
>> telephone at McInnes Cooper's expense. Avis Les informations contenues
>> dans ce courriel, y compris toute(s) pièce(s) jointe(s), sont
>> confidentielles et peuvent faire l'objet d'un privilège avocat-client.
>> Les informations sont dirigées au(x) destinataire(s) seulement. Si
>> vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur
>> par courriel ou par téléphone, aux frais de McInnes Cooper.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:35 AM
>> Subject: RE My complaint against the CROWN in Federal Court Attn David
>> Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to submit a motion for a
>> publication ban on my complaint trust that you dudes are way past too
>> late
>> To: David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca, peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca
>> peacock.kurt@telegraphjournal.
>> david.akin@sunmedia.ca, robert.frater@justice.gc.ca,
>> paul.riley@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca,
>> greg@gregdelbigio.com, joyce.dewitt-vanoosten@gov.bc.
>> joan.barrett@ontario.ca, jean-vincent.lacroix@gouv.qc.
>> peter.rogers@mcinnescooper.com
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, gopublic@cbc.ca,
>> Whistleblower@ctv.ca
>>
>> https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-
>>
>> http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/
>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.
>>
>> I repeat what the Hell do I do with the Yankee wiretapes taps sell
>> them on Ebay or listen to them and argue them with you dudes in
>> Feferal Court?
>>
>> Petey Baby loses all parliamentary privelges in less than a month but
>> he still supposed to be an ethical officer of the Court CORRECT?
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:10:14 -0400
>> Subject: Yo Mr Bauer say hey to your client Obama and his buddies in
>> the USDOJ for me will ya?
>> To: RBauer@perkinscoie.com, sshimshak@paulweiss.com,
>> cspada@lswlaw.com, msmith@svlaw.com, bginsberg@pattonboggs.com,
>> gregory.craig@skadden.com, pm@pm.gc.ca, bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca
>> Cc: alevine@cooley.com, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
>> michael.rothfeld@wsj.com, remery@ecbalaw.com
>>
>> QSLS Politics
>> By Location Visit Detail
>> Visit 29,419
>> Domain Name usdoj.gov ? (U.S. Government)
>> IP Address 149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice)
>> ISP US Dept of Justice
>> Location Continent : North America
>> Country : United States (Facts)
>> State : District of Columbia
>> City : Washington
>> Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
>> Language English (U.S.) en-us
>> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
>> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
>> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
>> CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2;
>> DI60SP1001)
>> Javascript version 1.3
>> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
>> Color Depth : 32 bits
>> Time of Visit Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
>> Last Page View Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
>> Visit Length 0 seconds
>> Page Views 1
>> Referring URL http://www.google.co...
>> Search Engine google.com
>> Search Words david amos bernie madoff
>> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-
>> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-
>> Out Click
>> Time Zone UTC-5:00
>> Visitor's Time Nov 17 2012 12:33:08 pm
>> Visit Number 29,419
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>>
>>
>> Could ya tell I am investigating your pension plan bigtime? Its
>> because no member of the RCMP I have ever encountered has earned it yet
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:36:04 -0400
>> Subject: This is a brief as I can make my concerns Randy
>> To: randyedmunds@gov.nl.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> In a nutshell my concerns about the actions of the Investment Industry
>> affect the interests of every person in every district of every
>> country not just the USA and Canada. I was offering to help you with
>> Emera because my work with them and Danny Williams is well known and
>> some of it is over eight years old and in the PUBLIC Record.
>>
>> All you have to do is stand in the Legislature and ask the MInister of
>> Justice why I have been invited to sue Newfoundland by the
>> Conservatives
>>
>>
>> Obviously I am the guy the USDOJ and the SEC would not name who is the
>> link to Madoff and Putnam Investments
>>
>> Here is why
>>
>> http://banking.senate.gov/
>>
>> Notice the transcripts and webcasts of the hearing of the US Senate
>> Banking Commitee are still missing? Mr Emory should at least notice
>> Eliot Spitzer and the Dates around November 20th, 2003 in the
>> following file
>>
>> http://www.checktheevidence.
>>
>> http://occupywallst.org/users/
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Hansen, David" David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca
>> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 19:28:44 +0000
>> Subject: RE: I just called again Mr Hansen
>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Hello Mr. Amos,
>>
>> I manage the Justice Canada civil litigation section in the Atlantic
>> region. We are only responsible for litigating existing civil
>> litigation files in which the Attorney General of Canada is a named
>> defendant or plaintiff. If you are a plaintiff or defendant in an
>> existing civil litigation matter in the Atlantic region in which
>> Attorney General of Canada is a named defendant or plaintiff please
>> provide the court file number, the names of the parties in the action
>> and your question. I am not the appropriate contact for other
>> matters.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> David A. Hansen
>> Regional Director | Directeur régional
>> General Counsel |Avocat général
>> Civil Litigation and Advisory | Contentieux des affaires civiles et
>> services de consultation
>> Department of Justice | Ministère de la Justice
>> Suite 1400 – Duke Tower | Pièce 1400 – Tour Duke
>> 5251 Duke Street | 5251 rue Duke
>> Halifax, Nova Scotia | Halifax, Nouvelle- Écosse
>> B3J 1P3
>> david.hansen@justice.gc.ca
>> Telephone | Téléphone (902) 426-3261 / Facsimile | Télécopieur (902)
>> 426-2329
>> This e-mail is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client
>> privilege. Unauthorized distribution or disclosure is prohibited. If
>> you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us and delete
>> this entire e-mail.
>> Before printing think about the Environment
>> Thinking Green, please do not print this e-mail unless necessary.
>> Pensez vert, svp imprimez que si nécessaire.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:23:24 -0300
>>> Subject: ATTN FBI Special Agent Richard Deslauriers Have you talked to
>>> your buddies Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly about the wiretap tapes YET?
>>> To: boston@ic.fbi.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
>>> bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov,
>>> jcarney@carneybassil.com, bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, birgittaj@althingi.is,
>>> shmurphy@globe.com, redicecreations@gmail.com
>>>
>>> FBI Boston
>>> One Center Plaza
>>> Suite 600
>>> Boston, MA 02108
>>> Phone: (617) 742-5533
>>> Fax: (617) 223-6327
>>> E-mail: Boston@ic.fbi.gov
>>>
>>> Hours
>>> Although we operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, our normal
>>> "walk-in" business hours are from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
>>> through Friday. If you need to speak with a FBI representative at any
>>> time other than during normal business hours, please telephone our
>>> office at (617) 742-5533.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300
>>> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is
>>> finally underway now correct? What the hell do I do with the wiretap
>>> tapes Sell them on Ebay?
>>> To: Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov,
>>> Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney@carneybassil.com,
>>> bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, wolfheartlodge@live.com, shmurphy@globe.com,
>>> >> jonathan.albano@bingham.com, mvalencia@globe.com
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>>> PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov, rounappletree@aol.com
>>>
>>> http://www.bostonglobe.com/
>>>
>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>>
>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask
>>> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>
>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>> cards?
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>> United States Senate
>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>
>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>> tapes.
>>>
>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>
>>> Very truly yours,
>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "David Amos" david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>> To: "Rob Talach" rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing
>>> the Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why
>>>
>>> The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should mean
>>> a lot to you
>>>
>>> http://www.checktheevidence.
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:37:08 -0400
>>> Subject: To Hell with the KILLER COP Gilles Moreau What say you NOW
>>> Bernadine Chapman??
>>> To: Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, phil.giles@statcan.ca,
>>> maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca, Jennifer.Nixon@ps-sp.gc.ca,
>>> bartman.heidi@psic-ispc.gc.ca, Yves.J.Marineau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> david.paradiso@erc-cee.gc.ca, desaulniea@smtp.gc.ca,
>>> denise.brennan@tbs-sct.gc.ca, anne.murtha@vac-acc.gc.ca,
>>> webo@xplornet.com, julie.dickson@osfi-bsif.gc.ca,
>>> rod.giles@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, toewsv1@parl.gc.ca,
>>> Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca,Cleme
>>> >> oig@sec.gov, whistleblower@finra.org, whistle@fsa.gov.uk,
>>> david@fairwhistleblower.ca
>>> Cc: j.kroes@interpol.int, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
>>> bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.
>>> Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>>> Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca,
>>> ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>>
>>> http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/nb/
>>>
>>> http://nb.rcmpvet.ca/
>>>
>>> From: Gilles Moreau Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:03:22 -0500
>>> Subject: Re: Lets ee if the really nasty Newfy Lawyer Danny Boy
>>> Millions will explain this email to you or your boss Vic Toews EH
>>> Constable Peddle???
>>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Please cease and desist from using my name in your emails.
>>>
>>> Gilles Moreau, Chief Superintendent, CHRP and ACC
>>> Director General
>>> HR Transformation
>>> 73 Leikin Drive, M5-2-502
>>> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2
>>>
>>> Tel 613-843-6039
>>> Cel 613-818-6947
>>>
>>> Gilles Moreau, surintendant principal, CRHA et ACC
>>> Directeur général de la Transformation des ressources humaines
>>> 73 Leikin, pièce M5-2-502
>>> Ottawa, ON K1A 0R2
>>>
>>> tél 613-843-6039
>>> cel 613-818-6947
>>> gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>>
>> First things first have a Look at the 3 documents hereto attached (Not
>> a big read)
>>
>> Listen to these old voicemails from interesting FEDS at about the
>> same point in time (Won't take long)
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/
>>
>> then ask youselves or the lawyers Senator Shelby or Spizter or Cutler
>> or Bernie madoff's old buddy Robert Glauber where the webcast and
>> transcript went for a very important hearing held in late 2003 by the
>> United States Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
>>
>> http://www.banking.senate.gov/
>>
>> Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the
>> Mutual Fund Industry
>>
>> November 20, 2003 02:00 PM
>> The Committee will meet in OPEN SESSION to conduct the second in a
>> series of hearings on the “Review of Current Investigations and
>> Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry.”
>>
>> Archived Webcast
>>
>> Witness Panel 1
>>
>> Mr. Stephen M. Cutler
>> Director - Division of Enforcement
>> Securities and Exchange Commission
>> cutler.pdf (175.5 KBs)
>>
>> Mr. Robert Glauber
>> Chairman and CEO
>> National Association of Securities Dealers
>> glauber.pdf (171.1 KBs)
>>
>> Eliot Spitzer
>> Attorney General
>> State of New York
>> spitzer.pdf (68.2 KBs)
>>
>> Permalink:
>> http://www.banking.senate.gov/
>>
>>
>> Trust that the evil women and men that PM Trudeau "The Younger"
>> appointed to to his cabinet will continue to play dumb because of
>> their oath to The Privy Council. However it does not follow that
>> everybody who works for them are dumb and they have no such oath to
>> uphold N'esy Pas?.
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Lisa Porteous <lporteous@kleinlyons.com>
>> Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 14:46:22 +0000
>> Subject: RCMP
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> David,
>>
>> Thank you for your email inquiring about our class action against the
>> RCMP. As you may know, the Notice of Claim was filed in the British
>> Columbia Supreme Court on March 27, 2012. The lawsuit has been
>> brought by former RCMP constable Janet Merlo on behalf of female RCMP
>> members. Unfortunately, we cannot assist you with your claim.
>>
>> We recommend that you contact Mr. Barry Carter of Mair Jensen Blair
>> LLP to discuss any claim you may have against the RCMP for harassment.
>> His contact information is as follows:
>>
>> Mr. Barry Carter
>> Mair Jensen Blair LLP
>> 1380-885 W. Georgia Street
>> Vancouver, BC V6C 3E8
>> Phone: 604-682-6299
>> Fax 1-604-374-6992
>>
>> This is not intended to be an opinion concerning the merits of your
>> case. In declining to represent you, we are not expressing an opinion
>> as to whether you should take further action in this matter.
>>
>> You should be aware that there may be strict time limitations within
>> which you must act in order to protect your rights. Failure to begin
>> your lawsuit by filing an action within the required time may mean
>> that you could be barred forever from pursuing a claim. Therefore, you
>> should immediately contact another lawyer ( as indicated above) to
>> obtain legal advice/representation.
>>
>> Thank you again for considering our firm.
>>
>> Yours truly,
>>
>> Lisa Porteous
>> Case Manager/Paralegal
>>
>> lporteous@kleinlyons.com
>> www.kleinlyons.com
>>
>> KLEIN ∙ LYONS
>> Suite 400-1385 West 8th Avenue
>> Vancouver BC V6H 3V9 Canada
>> Office 604.874.7171
>> Fax 604.874.7180
>> Direct 604.714.6533
>>
>> This email is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client
>> privilege. It is intended only for the use of the person to whom it is
>> addressed. Any distribution, copying or other use by anyone else is
>> strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
>> telephone us immediately and destroy this e-mail.
>>
>> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>
No comments:
Post a Comment