‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
From: AgentMargaritaville <AgentMargaritaville@
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 15:48:05 +0000
Subject: Re: Fwd: YO Dougy Ford who is this very strange Agent
Margaritaville dude? Clearly Peter MacKay's partner Mark Ellis must
know
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Awesome!
Dougie and Bill also know why I would like to see them join Mark Ellis
at the bottom of the building.
lol
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 09:00:23 -0400
Subject: Fwd: YO Dougy Ford who is this very strange Agent
Margaritaville dude? Clearly Peter MacKay's partner Mark Ellis must
know
To: kim@picaziolaw.com, tholmseth@wiktel.com, denisec65@hotmail.com,
lionnews00@gmail.com, AgentMargaritaville@
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
#PizzapuffTim Home$afe Talks About Laundering Money of Abel Danger Audience
895 views
•Premiered 10 hours ago
Agent Margaritaville
3.02K subscribers
You can't make up the words seen coming out of another mans mouth. In
this case the mouth of #PizzapuffTim Home$afe, who has been risking
his life by throwing G-Bombs and admitting to laundering the $750,000+
he received from the good men and women who support Field Mcconnell.
2:18 - 2:32 is where you can tell Tim is the same guy who called in
claiming he was a Navy Seal protecting Tim and that they needed money
for "safe houses." lol As an added bonus, I am including last nights
communication with some idiot who has been making demands of me by
email.... as though I give a shit who he is. Please subpoena all my
communications and when you do I will have over ever email Tim has
sent and received from his 8 accounts since this Odyssey of the fake
Pentagon Pedophile Taskforce began. Here is last nights email exchange
which I said I would post if I were bothered by this man who loves
Christ sooooooo much "he likes to read the bible while he
Masterbates." https://gofile.io/?c=vhzQIm No Mike Sherwood music was
polluted with this BULLSHIT matter, which should have federal
authorities knocking on Tims door soon, whereafter I will enjoy
arranging his boyfriends in jail for him.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 08:40:18 -0400
Subject: YO Dougy Ford who is this very strange Agent Margaritaville
dude? Clearly Peter MacKay's partner Mark Ellis must know
To: Premier@ontario.ca, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
meko@discussglobal.com, lagenomai4@protonmail.com, "PETER.MACKAY"
<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.
"Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey"
<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "barb.whitenect"
<barb.whitenect@gnb.ca>, "carl.urquhart" <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>,
"blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, jim@northwestlibertynews.com,
TulsiOffice@mail.house.gov, bdunne@piercebainbridge.com,
abrahamwilliamsdp@gmail.com, aloha@votetulsi.com
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
esauchelli@vnews.com, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Agent Margaritaville: The Canadian Children’s Army Schools - Timothy
Holmseth & Friend
371 views
•Feb 25, 2020
Divine Interloper
542 subscribers
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2020 00:32:56 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Mike Kerr RE Defendant Field McConnell
and the Yankee lawyer Rich Delmar
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Michael Mihalakis <meko@discussglobal.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2020 01:31:06 +0000
Subject: Re: RE Meko We just talked on my cell (506 434 8433) Here is why
To: "Magic@magicwichita.com" <Magic@magicwichita.com>,
"admin@dailyhaze.com" <admin@dailyhaze.com>, David Amos
<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I'm sorry I'm not understanding this. was there supposed to be an attachment?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: lagenomai4@protonmail.com
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 08:38:05 +0000
Subject: Re: Attn Mark.Ellis your partner Peter MacKay can never deny
knowing who I am and of my concerns because he answered my lawsuit
when he was the Attorney General of Canada Correct?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Excellent.
FWIW Mark Ellis is who I want to see Pedo MacKay toss from the top of
the BAKERMACKENZIE BUILDING.
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
President Trump, Time To Round Up The Satanic Bastards Who Murdered My Dad and 7,000 Other Canadians
126 Comments
54 Comments
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 13:35:29 -0800
Subject: Divine Interloper loves your comment
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Divine Interloper loves your comment
Divine Interloper loves your comment on
David Amos
Comment: @Divine Interloper I figured as much obviously you and I should
talk
Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?
Comment URL:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
Unsubscribe:
http://www.youtube.com/email_
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
From: YouTube <noreply@youtube.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 10:35:37 -0800
Subject: Divine Interloper loves your comment
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Divine Interloper loves your comment
Divine Interloper loves your comment on
David Amos
Comment: @Divine Interloper I sent Randi a message byway of Facebook saying
we should talk but she did not reply So I suspect she is not you Correct?
Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?
Comment URL:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
Unsubscribe:
http://www.youtube.com/email_
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
From: YouTube <noreply@youtube.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 18:25:22 -0800
Subject: Divine Interloper loves your comment
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Divine Interloper loves your comment
Divine Interloper loves your comment on Timothy Holmseth vs Agent
Margaritaville: Is It Possible? Eating B*bb*es! Need Help With This One!
David Amos
Comment: Methinks there are a lots of fools trying to play each other like
fiddles and its starting to backfire on them bigtime and the "Give Me
Money" Empires they tried to build on the Internet are burning down and
some of them have been arrested and others are hiding under rocks N'esy Pas?
Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?
Comment URL:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?
Unsubscribe:
http://www.youtube.com/email_
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
From: AgentMargaritaville <AgentMargaritaville@
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 15:48:05 +0000
Subject: Re: Fwd: YO Dougy Ford who is this very strange Agent
Margaritaville dude? Clearly Peter MacKay's partner Mark Ellis must
know
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Awesome!
Dougie and Bill also know why I would like to see them join Mark Ellis
at the bottom of the building.
lol
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 09:00:23 -0400
Subject: Fwd: YO Dougy Ford who is this very strange Agent
Margaritaville dude? Clearly Peter MacKay's partner Mark Ellis must
know
To: kim@picaziolaw.com, tholmseth@wiktel.com, denisec65@hotmail.com,
lionnews00@gmail.com, AgentMargaritaville@
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
#PizzapuffTim Home$afe Talks About Laundering Money of Abel Danger Audience
895 views
•Premiered 10 hours ago
Agent Margaritaville
3.02K subscribers
You can't make up the words seen coming out of another mans mouth. In
this case the mouth of #PizzapuffTim Home$afe, who has been risking
his life by throwing G-Bombs and admitting to laundering the $750,000+
he received from the good men and women who support Field Mcconnell.
2:18 - 2:32 is where you can tell Tim is the same guy who called in
claiming he was a Navy Seal protecting Tim and that they needed money
for "safe houses." lol As an added bonus, I am including last nights
communication with some idiot who has been making demands of me by
email.... as though I give a shit who he is. Please subpoena all my
communications and when you do I will have over ever email Tim has
sent and received from his 8 accounts since this Odyssey of the fake
Pentagon Pedophile Taskforce began. Here is last nights email exchange
which I said I would post if I were bothered by this man who loves
Christ sooooooo much "he likes to read the bible while he
Masterbates." https://gofile.io/?c=vhzQIm No Mike Sherwood music was
polluted with this BULLSHIT matter, which should have federal
authorities knocking on Tims door soon, whereafter I will enjoy
arranging his boyfriends in jail for him.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 08:40:18 -0400
Subject: YO Dougy Ford who is this very strange Agent Margaritaville
dude? Clearly Peter MacKay's partner Mark Ellis must know
To: Premier@ontario.ca, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
meko@discussglobal.com, lagenomai4@protonmail.com, "PETER.MACKAY"
<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.
"Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey"
<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "barb.whitenect"
<barb.whitenect@gnb.ca>, "carl.urquhart" <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>,
"blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, jim@northwestlibertynews.com,
TulsiOffice@mail.house.gov, bdunne@piercebainbridge.com,
abrahamwilliamsdp@gmail.com, aloha@votetulsi.com
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
esauchelli@vnews.com, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Agent Margaritaville: The Canadian Children’s Army Schools - Timothy
Holmseth & Friend
371 views
•Feb 25, 2020
Divine Interloper
542 subscribers
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2020 00:32:56 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Mike Kerr RE Defendant Field McConnell
and the Yankee lawyer Rich Delmar
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Michael Mihalakis <meko@discussglobal.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2020 01:31:06 +0000
Subject: Re: RE Meko We just talked on my cell (506 434 8433) Here is why
To: "Magic@magicwichita.com" <Magic@magicwichita.com>,
"admin@dailyhaze.com" <admin@dailyhaze.com>, David Amos
<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I'm sorry I'm not understanding this. was there supposed to be an attachment?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: lagenomai4@protonmail.com
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 08:38:05 +0000
Subject: Re: Attn Mark.Ellis your partner Peter MacKay can never deny
knowing who I am and of my concerns because he answered my lawsuit
when he was the Attorney General of Canada Correct?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Excellent.
FWIW Mark Ellis is who I want to see Pedo MacKay toss from the top of
the BAKERMACKENZIE BUILDING.
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 10:53:14 -0400
Subject: Attn Mark.Ellis your partner Peter MacKay can never deny
knowing who I am and of my concerns because he answered my lawsuit
when he was the Attorney General of Canada Correct?
To: MARK.ELLIS@bakermckenzie.com, lagenomai4@protonmail.com,
"PETER.MACKAY" <PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.
<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"Frank.McKenna" <Frank.McKenna@td.com>, "Bill.Blair"
<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, robmoorefundy <robmoorefundy@gmail.com>,
"rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey"
<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "mark.vespucci"
<mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, bbachrach <bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>,
"boris.johnson.mp" <boris.johnson.mp@parliament.
<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, stateofcorruptionnh1
<stateofcorruptionnh1@gmail.
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Bill.Morneau"
<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Hey Mr Ellis
Please enjoy this old file of mine
https://www.scribd.com/doc/
Then say Hey Big Bad Billy Clinton's little buddy Franky Boy McKenna
for me will ya? Did you know that his Clan wanted him to be a priest
when he was kid in Apohaqui?
FYI This set of document has been to the dockets of many courts and on
the desks of leagions of cop, lawyers and politians since I created it
in 2004 The Canadain Border Services and Attoerny General latest
Conservative critic Rob Moore and my other politcal foes received thes
documents when I first debated them in 2004 for the seat in Fundy
Royal
https://www.scribd.com/doc/
Anyone can scroll down tp page 134 to see Cardianal Bernard Law's nave
and the US District court date stamp of December 12 th, 2002 then
google the Cardianls names to see that he quit Beantweon and ran off
to hide under a rock in the Vatican the very next day. Ford the record
I sued the Cardinal and his cohort about money not child abuse.
https://www.bakermckenzie.com/
Mark V. Ellis
Partner
Baker & McKenzie LLP
416 865 6991
MARK.ELLIS@bakermckenzie.com
https://www.bakermckenzie.com/
Peter MacKay
Partner
Baker & McKenzie LLP
416 863 1221
PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com
What I find interesting is who are the very strange secretive people
chasing you, the Catholic dudes, Petey Baby MacKay and the TD Bank etc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Dr. Steve Pieczenik & Agent Margaritaville talk Gumballs and Coo's
(Warning - Confusing Audio)
862 views
•Premiered Jan 4, 2020
Agent Margaritaville
2.12K subscribers
For you BAD HOMBRES, and curiously minded, these two videos, were made
three days apart in the fall of 2016, and discuss the same project
from two different minds,... one being Dr Steve Pieczenik, who is the
true life model for Tom Clancy's "Jack Ryan."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
.... and the other being Agent Margaritaville, who is only known as
such because of Field McConnell's charming ways. Yet, two years
earlier on the front page of The Toronto Star, ... Agent
Margaritaville made a promise to the Vatican, .... a diet of fear, in
a war that will never end; after pedophile lawyer Mark Ellis of
BakerMcKenzie used the courts to coverup the rape of my 11 month old
daughter.
https://www.thestar.com/news/
Pedophile lawyer Mark Ellis firm BakerMcKenzie also represents The
Clinton Foundation.... hmmm
What you might find interesting is how Dr Steve and I both say the
same things, from different perspectives of the project..... at the
same time in the videos.... hmmm.
I am a designer of models. Dr Pieczenik is a leader of nations, and a
hero both in real life, and the fiction of Tom Clancy's "Jack Ryan"
adventures.
Dr Steve's original video was posted here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
My role in this matter, as it began one year earlier, from my garage
in Toronto, is found here:
https://youtu.be/sbpVZbjiKes
So what am I saying?
.... I wouldn't suggest those who abused and kidnapped my child should
sleep well. .. and that really includes you #markellis and those whom
you have coopted in your conspiracy.
Extortion has long been the manner of a whole race of people. Jeffrey
Epstein made his empire on it, as did Hillary Clinton, the Vatican and
Crown.
The most obvious way to change the world is with information.
What better weapon to destroy those evil bastards who have engaged in
the most heinous of crimes against children,... than hack their hive
and use it against them?
Apologies for the audio however the video has a message to a
particular party and I wish to let them know that I am just getting
warmed up.
Enjoy this month. It is going to be biblical!
Music: "Flashlight in the head, GOD BLESS CANADA" by the amazing
Michael Sherwood (1959 - 2019). I am thankful for all the comments on
the music. Michael and I were working on his next solo album when we
lost him in November 2019. It will be all Michael's music on this
channel.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Pedofaggots Sued Me for $50 Million .. and all I Got Was a Q!
813 views
•Jan 22, 2020
Agent Margaritaville
2.12K subscribers
In the war that never ends, the diet of fear.... originated with
Toronto's Pedophile Lawyer from BakerMcKenzie.... who saw their global
CEO become a member of the #rainbowplague last year.
Who?
How?
Why?
All will be disclosed here.... as the war continues, but we now know,
thanks to #Markellis that CAS across is trafficking children from
foster homes to pedofaggots in the crown, and the pedophile priests
across Canada have Vatican passports which enable them to sacrifice
children to Moloch in Catholic churches across Canada.
FWIW" The Catholic Archdiocese refused to return to court when they
learned that their supervisor, Pedophile Riaan Ryke, had threatened to
murder me 17 times in repeated phone calls to my "old' cell phone
number. They got the crooked courts to make the lawsuit disappear....
even though I refused to file a statement of defence and wished to
just argue the matter before a jury.
Riaan Ryke would be in prison for 1 years for intimidating a judicial
participant if the courts were not filled with pedophiles who cower to
the Vatican Pedophile mafia....
Soon... they will all be exterminated.... especially Ryke.
Music: "LOL" by the amazing Michael Sherwood (1959 - 2019) and Andy R.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
It's Mulah 🍺 Time! ... as Peter Mackay's associates plan jihad
against Canadian children.
1,355 views
•Jan 25, 2020
Agent Margaritaville
2.12K subscribers
If you can translate this video for us,.. please do sp in the comment section.
The British Government has been behind this U.N. terrorist agenda, in
order to coverup their pedophilia agenda. This is what President Putin
was talking about in the videos located on this channel. Pedophilia is
so massive within the Canadian crown's control system that they are
building a terrorist threat against Canadians so that they can
"protect us from the terrorists" while they pocket $10 BILLION dollars
a year trafficking and raping our children.
Pedo MacKay wants to be PRIME MINISTER DOES HE?
Ok Pedo... #markellis has us asking: "Why are these men free to travel
to and from Canada?"
"When are you going to ask Justin about that PEDOPHILE symbol
there.... Pedo MacKay?"
Watch, listen and learn.... "works with R.C.M.P" - " "The U.K.'s
training camp!"
Then call your local police and ask them who these men are and “WHY”
the are permitted international travel to and from Canada?
Or ... call the Trudeau Govt and ask them... and while you are at it,
ask the “BROTHER” of one of these men, who is CURRENLY A FEDERAL
MINISTER IN THE CANADIAN GOVT!
😳
Those who know who that man is.... feel free to share this video on
his social media accounts.
Music: “Intersections” by the amazing Michael Sherwood (1959 - 2019)
and Irene E.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Fiji Children and Meat - For Sale - Call TD Bank or MAG at 720 Gay
Street Toronto
214 views
•Jan 27, 2020
Agent Margaritaville
2.12K subscribers
NOTE FROM AGENT MARGARITAVILLE:
This isn't an entertainment channel. I will not permit anything that
is not 100% true to be posted on this channel, or state my belief in
that suggested truth, with a caveat.
The pope videos were taken down because I made an error. When I played
the original for my Italian language specialist I missed part of it. I
learned after it was posted that the transcript had a major error we
had missed
Meanwhile, this channel will perhaps disappear soon....
Feel free to download any or all of my content and do with it what you like.....
------------------------------
I will be providing the Metro Toronto Police, and any police who
attend an upcoming court appearance with evidence of Superior Court
Judges involved with Pedophilia and Child Trafficking, I will also be
providing evidence of a conspiracy as against me and my child by Mark
Ellis clients the Catholic Archdiocese of Toronto, Judges Hood,
Paisley and Kristjansen to kidnap my child, commit obstruction of
justice, and fraud over $50,000.
The metro police refused to investigate..... so I am left to demand
public accountability,.. I guess.
Their personal information and home addresses will appear.... if I disappear.
I will also be providing the court with evidence of CAS child
trafficking and the fact that the crown and Vatican are involved in
this, with the added glory of child sacrifices which are happening
within Canada in the full knowledge of our police, crown, courts and
government.
I will also provide all court documentation here and on Twitter.
Music: "Drobo, Mary and Tosh" by the wonderfully talented Michael
Sherwood (1959 - 2019) and Andy R.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2020 20:31:41 -0400
Subject: Attn Tulsi Gabbard and Brian Dunne Why are you ignoring me
yet suing Clinton?
To: abrahamwilliamsdp@gmail.com, aloha@votetulsi.com,
TulsiOffice@mail.house.gov, bdunne@piercebainbridge.com,
joe@abovethelaw.com
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, tammy.tam@scmp.com,
chungyan.chow@scmp.com, ian.young@scmp.com,
jim@northwestlibertynews.com, lagenomai4@protonmail.com, newstips
<newstips@cnn.com>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>
https://piercebainbridge.com/
Lead counsel for Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard and her campaign in First
Amendment and defamation matters.
Brian Dunne
Partner
O: (213) 246-2411
bdunne@piercebainbridge.com
https://abovethelaw.com/2020/
Tulsi Gabbard Files $50 Million Lawsuit Against Hillary Clinton For
Damaging Her Already Unelectable Reputation
Put aside whether or not this lawsuit will succeed... it's just not
okay to keep accusing people of this.
By Joe Patrice
Jan 22, 2020 at 3:30 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Margaritaville - On The Arrest of Field McConnell
7,441 views
•Nov 6, 2019
Agent Margaritaville
2.11K subscribers
🌴🇨🇦 - If you want more #AgentMargaritaville TRUTH, please be sure
to press LIKE and Subscribe as YouTube has joined Twitter in
suppressing this channel. - 🇨🇦🌴
In response to the emails and messages asking for information and
updates on the arrest of Field McConnell, I will make this one public
statement.
To view my original response: https://gofile.io/?c=ghfcnp
As always, I suggest you please, research all facts before you form
any opinion in this matter... in any matter. You know or should know
the coms by now, and where none are evident, .... discern!
Thank you again for your viewership and support!
Myself and my group will continue to fight to create a #newcanada,
where children are safe, .... and pedophiles are not.
https://twitter.com/WCheesie
lagenomai4@protonmail.com
This is an interestering reporter
https://theeprovocateur.
http://kehvrlb.com/michael-
https://roserambles.org/2019/
Monsters Inc is #Canadrenochrome ~ December 27, 2019
Posted on December 27, 2019 by cindyloucbp
https://youtu.be/t4-HvlXfAwM
Monsters Inc is #Canadrenochrome . Gov - With it's Monsters Inc / 9.11
Connection.
1,686 views
•Dec 26, 2019
Agent Margaritaville
2.11K subscribers
Editor’s Note: As a Laboratory Director, I have just one question in
response to watching this video of how the Dark pride themselves on
putting their actions out there in front of an unawakened public. My
question…where is this stuff made? It certainly would take a rather
sophisticated lab operation to refine “whatever” into this grisly
product! I wonder
https://www.thestar.com/news/
Catholic Children's Aid Society sues man for $50M over similar
website, alleged intimidation
By Alyshah Hasham Staff Reporter
Thu., Aug. 20, 2015
The Catholic Children’s Aid Society of Toronto is suing a man for $50
million for creating an allegedly “intentionally confusing” and
defamatory website with a similar domain name to their own website,
according to a statement of claim filed Wednesday.
The website misuses the CCAS trademark and brand and is intended to
undermine the work of the organization, the lawsuit alleges.
The lawsuit, which contains allegations that have not been proven in
court, also claims that the 52-year-old man launched an “ugly
campaign” of intimidation, defamation, invasion of privacy and threats
against CCAS employees and their family members in a series of online
posts, following the CCAS apprehending his daughter and placing her in
foster care for four months before she was returned to him and his
wife.
“It is clear (the defendant) intends to create an environment of
danger for CCAS and its staff and must be stopped from his nefarious
course of conduct with the assistance of this honorable court,” the
statement of claim alleges.
The man also claims to have somehow obtained more than 16,000 internal
emails from the CCAS upon activating his website and is threatening to
release them to the public, the lawsuit alleges.
In a post on his Facebook page referring to the emails, the man is
alleged to have written: “I am about to feed you a diet of fear until
I feel (my daughter) has been avenged . . . my revenge against you
will never end.”
In court Thursday morning, a judge granted an interim injunction with
the man’s consent. It required the website be taken down and prohibits
the man from communicating with CCAS staff about anything unrelated to
his daughter, from posting about anything intimidating or threatening
about the CCAS online, and from “engaging in false and misleading
business practices that utilize the CCAS trademark and business name.”
The lawyer representing the CCAS, Mark Ellis, said he could only say
that the CCAS was “satisfied” with the terms of the interim
injunction.
A statement of defence has not yet been filed.
In an interview, the man, who is not being named to protect the
identity of his young daughter, says he denies the allegations and
intends to vigorously defend himself.
He claims the CCAS wrongfully apprehended his daughter and that she
was mistreated while in the care of a foster family. (The CCAS says
his claims are “without foundation and substance” in the statement of
claim.) He is currently seeking $72,000 in legal costs from the CCAS
related to the apprehension.
What the CCAS describes as intimidation “is holding up a mirror to
things I have found in documents,” the man said, adding that his
online posts have been taken out of context. “It’s perfectly legal to
look into any public record on any person and publish it.”
He also says he notified the CCAS shortly after receiving the internal
emails to figure out what to do with them and never heard back until
the lawsuit was filed.
The man says he set up the website “www.ccastoronto.ca” three weeks
ago to help parents fight the CAS, to bring attention to the flaws in
the system and to hold the CAS accountable. (The CCAS website is
www.torontoccas.org ).
The website promotes the “Canadian Coalition for Accountability in
Social Work” going by the acronym CCAS and uses a modified version of
the CCAS logo.
“I am a parent who is extremely pissed off,” the man said.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 13:12:05 -0400
Subject: Attn Tulsi Gabbard and Abraham WilliamsI tried to speak to
you folks again but to no avail So I Tweeted you and managed to talk
to your friend Toby McIntire
To: abrahamwilliamsdp@gmail.com, aloha@votetulsi.com, TulsiOffice@mail.house.gov
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
https://twitter.com/
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @TulsiGabbard
I just tried to talk to your husband but he did not pick up and his
voicemail was full so I will send him an email like the one I sent you
yesterday
abrahamwilliamsdp@gmail.com
c. 808.726.5080
https://www.standwithaloha.
Hamptom House Party
Monday, December 30, 2019
6:30 PM 8:00 PM
Home of Toby McIntire
500 Exeter Rd.
Hampton, NH 03842
(603) 459-4650
I suggested that you folks Check this out first Please notice the
webcast and transcript are missing.
https://www.banking.senate.
Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the
Mutual Fund Industry
Date: Thursday, November 20, 2003 Time: 02:00 PM
Topic
The Committee will meet in OPEN SESSION to conduct the second in a
series of hearings on the “Review of Current Investigations and
Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry.”
Witnesses
Witness Panel 1
Mr. Stephen M. Cutler
Director - Division of Enforcement
Securities and Exchange Commission
Mr. Robert Glauber
Chairman and CEO
National Association of Securities Dealers
Eliot Spitzer
Attorney General
State of New York
FYI As you may already know the email I sent you folks again yesterday
is already published within my old blog from 2017
http://davidraymondamos3.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Team Tulsi <aloha@votetulsi.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2019 12:26:07 -0800
Subject: Thank You for Your Message Re: Fwd: Trust that you are more
than welcome Tulsi Please enjoy a little Deja Vu about Trump and the
FBI that many Canadian policians hope that you don't read
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Aloha!
Thank you for taking the time to write to us! Your email has been
received, and we want you to know that every email is read. While we
receive a high volume of emails every day, we do our very best to
answer each email requiring or requesting a response in a timely
manner.
We always appreciate hearing from you!
Mahalo,
~Team Tulsi
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2019 16:25:59 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Trust that you are more than welcome Tulsi Please enjoy
a little Deja Vu about Trump and the FBI that many Canadian policians
hope that you don't read
To: newseditor@vnews.com, aloha@votetulsi.com,
TulsiOffice@mail.house.gov, carolrobidoux@
info@yang2020.com, press@yang2020.com, info@equalcitizens.us,
blair@soundspeedpr.com, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
Newsroom@globeandmail.com, postur <postur@for.is>, premier
<premier@ontario.ca>
https://www.vnews.com/2020-
2020 candidate Tulsi Gabbard packs Lebanon’s Salt hill Pub
Crowd members jostle for a view of U.S. Rep. Tulsi Gabbard,
D-Hawaii, during a presidential campaign event at Salt hill Pub in
Lebanon, N.H., on Saturday, Nov. 9, 2019. (Valley News — Liz
Sauchelli)
By LIZ SAUCHELLI
Valley News Staff Writer
Published: 11/9/2019 10:18:20 PM
Related stories
2020 candidates Buttigieg, Biden drop by the Upper Valley
LEBANON — If the field of Democratic presidential candidates seems
crowded, it’s nothing compared to the throng that turned out to see
just one of them in Lebanon on Saturday.
About 100 people came to hear U.S. Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, D-Hawaii, speak
at a town hall-style meeting at Salt hill Pub. They packed into a
small room off the main pub, with a few dozen more spilling outside
the doors.
Gabbard made the most of the sizable crowd, entering through the back
of the pub and shaking hands with admirers as she came to the front.
She spoke for about 20 minutes before taking questions from the crowd.
“We are not the United States of America that we need to be,” Gabbard
said, citing a need to turn the tide and treat each other better. “We
particularly on her “help heroes fly” bill which made it easier for
veterans with prosthetic limbs to make it through security more
easily.
And common ground is one of the reasons she cited for her push for the
Oval Office.
“When I look out into the country, I see fellow Americans,” Gabbard
said regarding why she’s in the race. “I don’t see deplorables. I
don’t see us-versus-them.”
Military and foreign policy is one area where Gabbard feels she has
the bona fides.
She served two tours of duty in the Middle East, and she is currently
a major in the Army National Guard. She got cheers when she talked
about ending wars and the nuclear arms race.
“Our foreign policy connects to every other issue that we face,” she
said.
When the time came for questions from the audience, it started with a
divisive topic: abortion and restrictions thereon.
Gabbard said she supports abortion rights under Roe v. Wade but is
opposed to abortions in the third trimester unless they are medically
necessary to protect the life or health of the mother.
The candidate also fielded questions about health care, and she took
aim at the financial motives driving U.S. health care.
“The problem with our health care system is that at its core it is a
profit-driven one,” she said, adding that the nation needs to address
the core reasons medical costs are so high and find a way to bring
those costs down.
She also spoke of promoting nutrition training for physicians and
addressing the problem of food deserts — areas where finding healthy
food is difficult — which she said disproportionately affect
minorities and people of color.
Gabbard elicited a few grumbles for her response to a question about
the electoral college, which gave Donald Trump the presidency in 2016
despite his losing the popular vote. She did not condemn electors or
advocate for the process to be abolished as other Democrats, including
U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D.-Mass, have called for.
“I don’t support getting rid of the electoral college. What we need is
to reform it,” Gabbard said, adding that it helps give smaller states
like New Hampshire and Hawaii a say in the electoral process.
Liz Sauchelli can be reached at esauchelli@vnews.com or 603-727-3221.
Correction
U.S. Rep. Tulsi Gabbard said in an appearance in Lebanon Saturday
evening that she supports abortion rights under Roe v. Wade but is
opposed to abortions in the third trimester unless they are medically
necessary to protect the life or health of the mother. An earlier
version of this story incorrectly described her stance.
News Editor: John Gregg, 603-727-3217
News Email: newseditor@vnews.com
News Desk
Valley News
P.O. Box 877
White River Junction, VT 05001
Phone numbers: 603-298-8711
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 14:01:09 -0300
Subject: Trust that you are more than welcome Tulsi Please enjoy a
little Deja Vu about Trump and the FBI that many Canadian policians
hope that you don't read
To: TulsiOffice@mail.house.gov, aloha@votetulsi.com,
tcamerato@vnews.com, permission@vnews.com, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news-tips <news-tips@nytimes.com>, news
<news@dailygleaner.com>, "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>,
"steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "David.Akin"
<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, "Catherine.McKenna"
<Catherine.McKenna@parl.gc.ca>
<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
<Jane.Philpott@parl.gc.ca>, "Gerald.Butts"
<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "andrew.scheer"
<andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, "maxime.bernier"
<maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>, louis.plamondon@parl.gc.ca,
"elizabeth.may" <elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca>,
donald.lizotte@quebecormedia.
<ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>
<premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniacpress@yang2020.com,
info@equalcitizens.us, blair@soundspeedpr.com
You have my private cell number please do not hesitate to call before
you talk to questionable Yankees in New Hampshire this week
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Team Tulsi <aloha@votetulsi.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 09:48:06 -0700
Subject: Thank You for Your Message Re: Attn Tim Camerato I just
called and left a voicemail message about permission to post your
article online about Tulsi Gabbard and Climate Change etc before the
writ is dropped in Canada
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Aloha!
Thank you for taking the time to write to us! Your email has been
received, and we want you to know that every email is read. While we
receive a high volume of emails every day, we do our very best to
answer each email requiring or requesting a response in a timely
manner.
We always appreciate hearing from you!
Mahalo,
~Team Tulsi
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Catherine.McKenna@parl.gc.ca
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 16:48:02 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Tim Camerato I just called and left a
voicemail message about permission to post your article online about
Tulsi Gabbard and Climate Change etc before the writ is dropped in
Canada
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for contacting my office. This automated response is to
assure you that your message has been received by my office and will
be reviewed as soon as possible.
Due to the high volume of correspondence received, I am not able to
respond personally to every inquiry. Please do not hesitate to contact
my office at the coordinates below should you have any questions
regarding the status of your query.
Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
Environment and Climate Change if it concerns topics pertaining to the
Minister of Environment and Climate Changes' role. For all future
correspondence addressed to the Minister of Environment and Climate
Change, I ask that you please write directly to
ec.ministre-minister.ec@
Best,
Catherine McKenna, Member of Parliament, Ottawa Centre
* * *
Je vous remercie d'avoir communiqu? avec mon bureau. La pr?sente
r?ponse automatique vous est envoy?e pour vous informer que votre
message a ?t? re?u et qu'il sera examin? le plus rapidement possible.
En raison du volume ?lev? de correspondance re?ue, je ne peux r?pondre
personnellement ? chaque demande. N'h?sitez pas ? contacter mon bureau
aux coordonn?es ci-dessous pour vous renseigner sur le statut de votre
demande.
Veuillez noter que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
l'Environnement et du Changement climatique s'il concerne des
questions qui ont trait au r?le de la ministre de l'Environnement et
du Changement climatique. Nous vous prions d'envoyer directement toute
correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de l'Environnement et du
Changement climatique ?
ec.ministre-minister.ec@
Cordialement,
Catherine McKenna, d?put?e, Ottawa Centre
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale (PS/SP)" <Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 16:48:06 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Tim Camerato I just called and left a
voicemail message about permission to post your article online about
Tulsi Gabbard and Climate Change etc before the writ is dropped in
Canada
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la
S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile.
En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un
retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre
message sera examin? avec attention.
Merci!
L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle
S?curit? publique Canada
*********
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of
Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
Due to addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in
processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
carefully reviewed.
Thank you!
Ministerial Correspondence Unit
Public Safety Canada
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2020 05:20:12 +0000
Subject: RE: Methinks the lawyer Derek.Sloan and the venture
capitalist Rick Peterson have every right to know what everybody else
knowsabout you versus me N'esy Pas Petey Baby MacKay?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2020 01:19:33 -0400
Subject: Methinks the lawyer Derek.Sloan and the venture capitalist
Rick Peterson have every right to know what everybody else knowsabout
you versus me N'esy Pas Petey Baby MacKay?
To: Derek.Sloan@parl.gc.ca, rick@petersoncapital.ca, "PETER.MACKAY"
<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Hannah.Thibedeau"
<Hannah.Thibedeau@cbc.ca>, "Catherine.Cullen"
<Catherine.Cullen@cbc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>,
"mc \"Newsroom\"" <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "Nathalie.Drouin"
<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
Social conservative MP Derek Sloan running for Conservative
leadership, promises 'bold ideas'
Sloan is trying to position himself as an alternative to 'boring" candidates'
Catherine Cullen · CBC News · Posted: Jan 22, 2020 2:08 PM ET
https://www.ourcommons.ca/
House of Commons *
Ottawa, Ontario,
Canada K1A 0A6
Telephone: 613-992-5321
Derek.Sloan@parl.gc.ca,
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
Businessman Rick Peterson is taking a second run at the Conservative leadership
'I'm probably going to be the only candidate who has to meet a
payroll,' Peterson tells CBC News
Hannah Thibedeau · CBC News · Posted: Jan 22, 2020 1:15 PM ET
https://www.petersoncapital.
Rick Peterson - President
More than 30 years in Canadian capital markets. Investment Advisor,
institutional sales, investment banking experience at senior roles at
Midland Walwyn Capital Inc, Merrill Lynch Canada, Yorkton Securities
and HSBC Securities.
Founded Peterson Capital in 2003; Conservative Party of Canada 2017
leadership - candidate
780-868-6822
rick@petersoncapital.ca
---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:02:40 +0000
Subject: RE: Methinks Sylvie Gadoury the General Counsel of CBC should
agree that Marilyn Gladu has every right to know what everybody else
knows N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:02:32 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Sylvie Gadoury the General Counsel
of CBC should agree that Marilyn Gladu has every right to know what
everybody else knows N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: michael.chong@parl.gc.ca
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:02:54 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Sylvie Gadoury the General Counsel
of CBC should agree that Marilyn Gladu has every right to know what
everybody else knows N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thanks very much for getting in touch with me!
This email is to acknowledge receipt of your message and to let you
know that every incoming email is read and reviewed. A member of my
Wellington-Halton Hills team will be in touch with you shortly if
follow-up is required.
Due to the high volume of email correspondence, priority is given to
responding to residents of Wellington-Halton Hills and to emails of a
non-chain (or "forwards") variety.
In your email, if you:
* have verified that you are a constituent by including your
complete residential postal address and a phone number, a response
will be provided in a timely manner.
* have not included your residential postal mailing address,
please resend your email with your complete residential postal address
and phone number, and a response will be forthcoming.
If you are not a constituent of Wellington Halton-Hills, please
contact your Member of Parliament. If you are unsure who your MP is,
you can find them by searching your postal code at
http://www.ourcommons.ca/en
Any constituents of Wellington-Halton Hills who require urgent
attention are encouraged to call the constituency office at
1-866-878-5556 (toll-free in riding). Please rest assured that any
voicemails will be returned promptly.
Once again, thank you for your email.
The Hon. Michael Chong, M.P.
Wellington-Halton Hills
toll free riding office:1-866-878-5556
Ottawa office: 613-992-4179
E-mail: michael.chong@parl.gc.ca<
Website : www.michaelchong.ca<http://
THIS MESSAGE IS ONLY INTENDED FOR THE USE OF THE INTENDED RECIPIENT(S)
AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY AND/OR
CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution,
copying, conversion to hard copy or other use of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient and have
received this message in error, please notify me by return e-mail and
delete this message from your system.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:02:54 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Sylvie Gadoury the General Counsel
of CBC should agree that Marilyn Gladu has every right to know what
everybody else knows N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
?
Hello -
Thank you for contacting the office of MP Erin O'Toole.
Please accept this automatic response as confirmation that your email
has been received. Your message is important to us and we will do our
best to respond to you as soon as possible. Our office may be unable
to respond to your message immediately, as we receive a large volume
of correspondence. If your matter is urgent please contact our office
at:
Office of MP Erin O'Toole
54 King Street East, Suite 103
Bowmanville, ON
L1C 1N3
Tele. 905-697-1699 or Toll Free: 1-866-436-1141
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:02:27 -0400
Subject: Methinks Sylvie Gadoury the General Counsel of CBC should
agree that Marilyn Gladu has every right to know what everybody else
knows N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?
To: Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, jbradley@canadian-republic.ca,
tfreda@canadian-republic.ca, info@canadian-republic.ca,
darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca, sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca
cra-arc.media@cra-arc.gc.ca, premier@ontario.ca,
Newsroom@globeandmail.com, sturgeon.nathalie@
news@dailygleaner.com, Hannah.Thibedeau@cbc.ca,
Catherine.Cullen@cbc.ca
Cc: Marilyn.gladu@parl.gc.ca, motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca, erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca,
andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, michael.chong@parl.gc.ca,
Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com
https://davidraymondamos3.
Wednesday, 15 January 2020
Peter MacKay set to enter the Conservative leadership race today
https://twitter.com/
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Kathryn98967631 and 49 others
I never heard of Marilyn Gladu so I called her to explain why MacKay
made my day but her assistant was too busy to check my Twitter account
to verify what I was saying was true so I told her to enjoy my email
https://davidraymondamos3.
#nbpoli #cdnpoli
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Kathryn98967631 and 49 others
Methinks everybody knows why MacKay just made my day Trudeau The
Younger cannot deny that Petey Baby answered this lawsuit while Harper
was still the boss N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.
#nbpoli #cdnpoli
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
Peter MacKay set to enter the Conservative leadership race today
MacKay's leadership run has been in the rumour mill for months
Catherine Cullen · CBC News · Posted: Jan 15, 2020 12:11 PM ET
1213 Comments
David Sampson
But will intelligent "progressive" conservatives ever forgive Peter
for giving away a once proud national political institution to a horde
of western based reform fundamentalists?
Eugene Peabody
Reply to @David Sampson: Not only can former PC members not trust him
but Canadians cannot also.When a man.s word is no good ,he is the
same.
Anne Clarke
Reply to @David Sampson: they will do anything to win right?
Frank Paul
Reply to @David Sampson: Nope.
Neil Denman
Reply to @David Sampson:
I have those feelings too: I have a hard time forgiving that. But, at
least there are signs that the next leader may be a PCer rather than a
Reformer. Peter Mackay, Jean Charest...I'm no fan of either, but it's
a step away from Harper and Scheer.
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @David Sampson: Methinks everybody knows why MacKay just made
my day N'esy Pas?
David Allan
Reply to @Neil Denman:
"I have those feelings too: I have a hard time forgiving that. But, at
least there are signs that the next leader may be a PCer rather than a
Reformer."
He's a reformer now. He solidly demonstrated so with his last 9 years
in Parliament.
Or is he just an opportunist who doesn't really care aside from his
quest for personal power?
Sean Cronin
Reply to @David Sampson:
I will. It's ancient history now.
Art Rowe
Reply to @David Sampson:
Like there was ever a doubt he would run?
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @David Raymond Amos: Methinks its comical that even Trudeau
The Younger cannot deny that Petey Baby answered my lawsuit in Federal
Court while Harper was still the boss N'esy Pas?
Craig Hall
Reply to @David Sampson: Nobody cares except the Liberals. And David Orchard.
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Craig Hall: I still do
David Linkletter
Reply to @Frank Paul: cough robo calls to name but one
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Craig Hall: BTW I remember talking to David Orchard in early
2004 about what went down and explained to him why I was preparing to
run for a seat in the 38th Parliament Furthermore I put proof of our
contact in a email which can still be found on the Internet to this
very day
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Craig Hall: By the same token I never heard of Marilyn Gladu
until I read this article so I called her to explain why MacKay made
my day but her assistant was too busy to check my Twitter account to
verify what I was saying was true so I told her to enjoy my email
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 17:55:17 +0000
Subject: RE: YO Tom Freda Say Hey Sylvie Gadoury the General Counsel
of CBC for me will ya?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Mr. Amos,
> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>
> Department of Justice
>
>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Good Day Sir
>>
>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>
>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>
>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>> suggested that you study closely.
>>
>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>
>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>
>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>>
>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>>
>> April 3rd, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/
>>
>>
>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>
>>
>> The only hearing thus far
>>
>> May 24th, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/
>>
>>
>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>
>> Date: 20151223
>>
>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>
>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>
>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>
>> Plaintiff
>>
>> and
>>
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>> Defendant
>>
>> ORDER
>>
>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>> December 14, 2015)
>>
>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>> in its entirety.
>>
>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>> he stated:
>>
>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>
>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>> Police.
>>
>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>
>>
>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>> is no order as to costs.
>>
>> “B. Richard Bell”
>> Judge
>>
>>
>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>
>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>
>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>> most
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>> dudes are way past too late
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Merci ,
>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>
>>
>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>
>> January 13, 2015
>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>
>> December 8, 2014
>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>
>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>
>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>
>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>> campaign of 2006.
>>
>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>
>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>
>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>
>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>
>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>
>> Subject:
>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>
>> January 30, 2007
>>
>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>
>> Mr. David Amos
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>
>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>
>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>> Minister of Health
>>
>> CM/cb
>>
>>
>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>
>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>
>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>
>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>
>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>
>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>> Traffic Services NCO
>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>>
>>
>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>> fax: 506-444-5224
>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>
>
>
> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.
>> ilian.html
>>
>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>>
>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>
>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>> cards?
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>> 6
>>>
>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>> United States Senate
>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>
>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>> tapes.
>>>
>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>
>>> Very truly yours,
>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>
>>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>
>
> Sunday, 19 November 2017
> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
> The Supreme Court
>
> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.
>
>
> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>
> Amos v. Canada
> Court (s) Database
>
> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
> Date
>
> 2017-10-30
> Neutral citation
>
> 2017 FCA 213
> File numbers
>
> A-48-16
> Date: 20171030
>
> Docket: A-48-16
> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
> CORAM:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
>
> BETWEEN:
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
> Respondent on the cross-appeal
> (and formally Appellant)
> and
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
> Appellant on the cross-appeal
> (and formerly Respondent)
> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>
> THE COURT
>
>
>
> Date: 20171030
>
> Docket: A-48-16
> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
> CORAM:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
>
> BETWEEN:
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
> Respondent on the cross-appeal
> (and formally Appellant)
> and
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
> Appellant on the cross-appeal
> (and formerly Respondent)
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>
> I. Introduction
>
> [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
> (Claim at para. 96).
>
> [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
> Prothontary’s Order).
>
>
> [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>
>
> [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
> cross-appeal.
>
>
> II. Preliminary Matter
>
> [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
> several judges but did not name those judges.
>
> [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
> c. F-7:
>
>
> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
> Appeal.
> […]
>
> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
> […]
> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>
> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>
>
> [7] However, these subsections only provide that the
> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
> section.
> [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>
> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
> matière civile et pénale.
> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>
> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>
>
> [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
> appeal book.
>
>
> [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
> conflict in any matter related to him.
>
>
> [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>
>
> [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
> such judge had a conflict.
>
>
> [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
> was a member of such firm.
>
>
> [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>
>
> [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
> [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
> apprehension of bias:
> 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
> reasonable apprehension of bias:
> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>
> [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
> (4th) 193).
>
> [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
> 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>
>
> 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>
>
> 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>
>
> 30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
> To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
> 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>
>
> 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
> events from over a decade ago.
> (emphasis added)
>
> [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
> Webb hearing this appeal.
>
> [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>
> [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>
> [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>
> [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
> to recuse himself.
>
> [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>
> [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>
>
> III. Issue
>
> [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>
> IV. Analysis
>
> A. Standard of Review
>
> [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>
> [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
> interfere.
>
>
> B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
> Prothonotary’s Order?
>
> [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>
> 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
> (…)
>
>
> 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
> [footnotes omitted].
>
>
> [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
> para. 27).
>
>
> [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>
>
> [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>
> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>
> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>
> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>
> [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>
> [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>
> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
> of process…
>
> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>
> [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>
> [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
> supporting a cause of action.
>
> [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>
> V. Conclusion
> [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
> without leave to amend.
> "Wyman W. Webb"
> J.A.
> "David G. Near"
> J.A.
> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
> J.A.
>
>
>
> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>
> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
> DOCKET:
>
> A-48-16
>
>
>
> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
>
>
> PLACE OF HEARING:
>
> Fredericton,
> New Brunswick
>
> DATE OF HEARING:
>
> May 24, 2017
>
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
> DATED:
>
> October 30, 2017
>
> APPEARANCES:
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
> (on his own behalf)
>
> Jan Jensen
>
>
> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>
> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
> Nathalie G. Drouin
> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>
> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 13:33:00 -0400
Subject: Re: Notice of Harassment I am certain that Rob Moore and the
RCMP can explain my concerns with questionable lawyers and their
actions CORRECT?
To: Pantea Jafari <jafari@jafarilaw.ca>
Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Tugrul Pinar
<admin@jafarilaw.ca>, "mgreene@sgimm.ca" <mgreene@sgimm.ca>,
"media@blaineimmigration.com" <media@blaineimmigration.com>,
"Sophia.Harris" <Sophia.Harris@cbc.ca>, "Bill.Blair"
<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>,
"Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
<mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov>, "jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca"
<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "carl.urquhart"
<carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Gerald.Butts"
<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>,
washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
"barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Barbara Massey <Barbara.Massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 12:28:58 -0500
Subject: Re: Notice of Harassment (Out of Office )
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
I am out of the office until Wednesday, January 22, 2020, and will not
be accessing my Emails. For any urgencies, you may contact Jolene
Harvey, General Counsel @ 613 843 4892., or my admin assistant, Sandra
Lofaro 613 843 3540..
------------------------------
Je suis absent du bureau jusqu'au 22 janvier 2020, et je n'accéderai à
mes courriéls. Pour toute urgence,.vous pouvez communiquer avec Jolene
Harvey, Avocate générale, au 613 843 4892 ou avec mon adjointe admin.
Sandra Lofaro 613 843 3540.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Moore, Rob - M.P." <Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:28:33 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Notice of Harassment
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
On behalf of the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. thank you for your
email. Our office appreciates the time you took to get in touch with
our office. Due to the high volume of email correspondence our office
receives, below is a guide on how your email will be responded to:
Constituent of Fundy Royal:
The constituents of Fundy Royal are our office’s priority. Please
ensure to include your full contact details on your email and the
appropriate staff will be able to action your request. We strive to
ensure all constituent correspondence is responded to in a timely
manner.
If your query is case related (i.e. immigration, CPP, EI, CRA, etc.),
consent forms will need to be filled out before your file can be
activated. If you have not yet filled out our office’s consent form, a
staff member will be in contact with you.
If your question or concern is time sensitive, please call our office:
506-832-4200.
Event Invitations and Meeting Requests:
If you have sent meeting request or an event invitation, we sincerely
appreciate the kind request and we will check his availability to see
if his schedule can accommodate.
Invitations for Fundy Royal are managed in the riding office and
Ottawa based events and meetings are managed from the Parliamentary
office. The appropriate staff will follow up on your request.
Non-Constituent Enquiries:
If you are not a Fundy Royal resident, given the high volume of emails
we receive, your email will be reviewed and filed as INFORMATION.
If the email is Critic portfolio in nature, it will be responded to
as necessary.
Again, we sincerely appreciate you taking the time to contact the
office of the Honourable Rob Moore.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:28:22 +0000
Subject: RE: Notice of Harassment
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 10:55:46 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Here is the latest malicious trick pulled by
CBC for the benefit of the LIEbranos just before the confidence vote
on Brian Gallant
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
message will be carefully reviewed.
To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future
correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write
directly to the Department of Justice at
mcu@justice.gc.ca<mailto:mcu@
Thank you
-------------------
Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
Vancouver Granville.
Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
votre adresse et votre code postal.
Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.
Merci
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Jensen, Jan" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 10:55:11 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Here is the latest malicious trick pulled by
CBC for the benefit of the LIEbranos just before the confidence vote
on Brian Gallant
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I will be away from the office and not returning until Monday,
November 5th, 2018. If you require immediate assistance, please
contact my assistant at (902) 407 7461.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 10:55:43 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Here is the latest malicious trick pulled by
CBC for the benefit of the LIEbranos just before the confidence vote
on Brian Gallant
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 06:55:07 -0400
Subject: Here is the latest malicious trick pulled by CBC for the
benefit of the LIEbranos just before the confidence vote on Brian
Gallant
To: "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, "Alex.Johnston"
<Alex.Johnston@cbc.ca>, "darrow.macintyre" <darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>,
Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, "Pierre.Paul-Hus.a1"
<Pierre.Paul-Hus.a1@parl.gc.ca
<pierre.poilievre.a1@parl.gc.
ps.publicsafetymcu-
<ralph.goodale@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"Jody.Wilson-Raybould" <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
"clare.barry" <clare.barry@justice.gc.ca>, "david.hansen"
<david.hansen@justice.gc.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
"Dale.Morgan" <Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "david.eidt"
<david.eidt@gnb.ca>, "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>,
"brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"
<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
lorri.warner@justice.gc.ca, "jan.jensen" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>,
"Nathalie.Drouin" <Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
<bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "andrew.baumberg"
<andrew.baumberg@fct-cf.gc.ca>
<Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca
"marc.giroux" <marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Liliana.Longo"
<Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
english@rcinet.ca, "kennedy.stewart" <kennedy.stewart@parl.gc.ca>,
pvanloan@airdberlis.com, nicola.diiorio@bcf.ca, "Nicola.DiIorio"
<Nicola.DiIorio@parl.gc.ca>, "Catherine.Tait" <Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca>,
"sylvie.gadoury" <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.
<Sophia.Harris@cbc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
<macpherson.don@dailygleaner.
<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
news919 <news919@rogers.com>, sfine <sfine@globeandmail.com>, news
<news@hilltimes.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, newstips
<newstips@cnn.com>
and Brian Galllant can never claim that they didn't know the score
N'esy Pas?
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)" <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 13:11:27 +0000
Subject: RE: Not long after CBC closed a comment section and erased
one of my comments I hear Terry Seguin talking to Sophia Harris about
money and shook my head
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be
assured that your email will be reviewed.
If this is a media request, please forward your email to
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med
*************************************
Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné.
Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
They claim I have mutiple account AFTER ALE JOHNSTON MADE ME CREATE
ANOTHERthen they deleted everything last week I call the lawyer One
accont is put back in shape and it lasts a week or so
YEA RIGHT Trust that I will SUE CBC
Your account has been banned permanently. Reason: We have banned this
account because we believe it is in violation of our Terms of Use,
specifically using multiple accounts. For more information, please
visit: http://www.cbc.ca/aboutcbc/
https://davidraymondamos3.
Thursday, 1 November 2018
In the words the Oh So Honourable Yankee Gomer Pyle
Surprise Surprise Surprise
Your account has been banned permanently. Reason: We have banned this
account because we believe it is in violation of our Terms of Use,
specifically using multiple accounts. For more information, please
visit: http://www.cbc.ca/aboutcbc/
276 Comments
David Amos
The words of the wiseguy and Oh So Honourable Fictional Yankee Gomer
Pyle come to mind
Surprise Surprise Surprise
David Amos
Methinks that it is wickedly special that this comment section should
still be open during and after the confidence vote is history tomorrow
N'esy Pas?
Ray Bungay
I heard on another network That Mr Gallant will discuss what to do
next with is wife if he loses the vote on Friday! She definitely has
his back for sure and was very good on the campaign trail!
https://atlantic.ctvnews.ca/n-
David Amos
Content disabled.
@Ray Bungay Methinks most members of Canada's self described" Natural
Governing Party" wish they could follow Trudeau The Elder's tracks in
the snow N'esy Pas?
David Amos
@David Amos Oh My Methinks the liberals and their buddies are overly
sensitive tonight N'esy Pas?
Ray Bungay
Higgs surely could not be worse than Gallant. When the change takes
place I will looking forward to the real truth on the Finances of NB!
Likely much worse than presented days before the Election call!!
David Amos
Content disabled.
@Ray Bungay Methinks you should have a long talk with all the
pensioners suing the the government because of the past actions of
Higgs for the benefit of bankers. Why else would Gallant try to enlist
him after the last election? Higgs did offer up an affidavit so it
must be true. After all it was witnessed by a conservative lawyer who
is a former Harper MP.
That said even Gallant must admit that it was pretty funny in the last
leader's debate Higgs teased Austin about being refused as a
Conservative candidate at the very last minute and the old KISS farmer
stated he was thankful to be so accustomed to BS N'esy Pas?
David Amos
@David Amos Oh My did I strike a nerve again?
Mack Leigh
Jeff Smith
Higgs will form the next government and will lead for the next 4
years, with an unsteady alliance with the PANB. That's my prediction.
Marguerite Deschamps
@Jeff Smith; not for long as Gauvin will bolt.
David Amos
@Marguerite Deschamps YUP
David Amos
@Marguerite Deschamps "Gauvin will bolt".
"He also said PC MLA Robert Gauvin would have to explain why he'd vote
against a Liberal promise to renew the $20 million Northern Fund."
Mack Leigh
Colin Seeley
Some folks think French school busses are a human rights issue.
How ridiculous can you be.
I am in favour of children of all cultures and languages on the same busses.
That’s how a lot of Europeans come to learn and speak 4 and 5
languages. And they don’t lose their cultures.
I am in favour of EMT’s connected to a multilingual dispatcher 24/7/365.
That’s not anti -French. That’s called diversity something the rest of
us all support.
How can anyone support Gallantism and Greenism’s in this place.
Marguerite Deschamps
@Colin Seeley, as sure as you speak 4 and 5 languages.
David Amos
@Colin Seeley Methinks you should give Higgs a call and ask him why he
messed with your pension N'esy Pas?
Brian Robertson
It should never have come to this.
He lost the election based on the number of seats, and should never
have been given the first opportunity to form a government.
At the very least, this will correct that error.
David Amos
@Brian Robertson The rules are such that has Gallant has the right to
try to form government. NOBODY won a majority. I am far from a liberal
fan particularly after they supported my illegal barring in 2004,
stole my Harley in 2007, falsely imprisoned me in 2008 and I have been
arguing them in Federal Court since 2015 but one must be ethical even
though they are not. Methinks that is not hard to understand N'esy
Pas?
Marguerite Deschamps
@David Amos, you're right, he is merely following tradition. He has
the first kick at the can.
John Connelly
@David Amos Sorry to hear what you went through...
Yes, technically the rules are such .... However, he clearly lost by
one seat, and the more ethical, sensible thing to do for the sake of
the people would have been to concede to Higgs. The rules allow for
that concession.
He is recklessly flaunting the peoples money around to bribe power.
The spirit of the Westminster rules were not meant for this.
Marguerite Deschamps
@John Connelly, there's a vestige of the malarkey of a totalitarian
system of a bygone era for you. What a joke that we keep such an
archaic system all the while gloating that we are a democracy!
David Amos
@John Connelly "The spirit of the Westminster rules were not meant for this."
@Marguerite Deschamps "there's a vestige of the malarkey of a
totalitarian system of a bygone era for you"
It should be a small wonder to both of you why I am suing the Queen
Methinks if you were to go to Federal Court in Fredericton and pull my
docket you would roll on the floor laughing at the Government of New
Brunswick's response to my Statement of Claim N'esy Pas?
Marguerite Deschamps
@David Amos, the likes of Adrienne Clarkson would not like us
eh?https://www.cbc.ca/news/
David Amos
@Marguerite Deschamps Did you even bother to check out my lawsuit Her
letter to me in 2004 is quoted verbatim in statement # 8
David Amos
@David Amos “September 11th, 2004
Dear Mr. Amos,
On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne Clarkson, I
acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and CD regarding
corruption, one received from you directly, and the other forwarded to
us by the Office of the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick.
I regret to inform you that the Governor General cannot intervene in
matters that are the responsibility of elected officials and courts of
Justice of Canada. You already contacted the various provincial
authorities regarding your concerns, and these were the appropriate
steps to take.
Yours sincerely.
Renee Blanchet
Office of the Secretary
to the Governor General”
Marguerite Deschamps
@David Amos, she and the position is as useless as a teeth on a bull!
David Amos
@Marguerite Deschamps The letter in statement #3 from a liberal lawyer
who taught at UNB when I attended caused me to come home and run
against them all
Jan 3rd, 2004
Dear Mr. Amos
Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to my
predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding your safety.
I apologize for the delay in responding.
If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
suggest that you contact the police of local jurisdiction. In
addition, any evidence of criminal activity should be brought to their
attention since the police are in the best position to evaluate the
information and take action as deemed appropriate.
I trust that this information is satisfactory.
Yours sincerely
A. Anne McLellan
John Connelly
Gallant is now naming the MlA's and laying out the briberies to their
perspective constituencies in hopes of bullying their vote.....
He is now recklessly using public monies for bribery, in conjunction
with bullying to hang on to power, with no regard for the peoples
finances. If ever an unethical politician should be shown the door,
this is it.
Shame on the Greens for supporting this unethical power mongering.
David Amos
@John Connelly Methinks my political foes must find it kinda comical
that you have a very similar name to the FBI Agent related to the
Yankee wiretap tapes I have served upon them. The recent demise of his
old buddy must be making everybody nervous waiting for me to say
something about that However sometimes less is more N'esy Pas?
Rosco holt
@John Connelly
Higgs seems to be power mongering too.
Daniela Camara.
ReplyDeleteI am overwhelm with joy and happiness and i am happy to share this with you all around the world about how Dr.CHUKWU MADU HERBAL HOME cured HERPES VIRUS...ever since i was diagnosed of Herpes virus in 2015, I was always thinking on how I can get a solution out of my body so that i can be okay again. Until One day I went online on the internet to know more about the Herpes Virus i came across a Review Comment many people are saying that Dr.CHUKWU MADU HERBAL HOME cured their Herpes Genital Virus, I did not believe, i search again and i saw a testimony of someone who has been healed from HPV AND HIV by Dr.CHUKWU MADU HERBAL HOME..and i decided to contact Dr CHUKWU MADU HERBAL HOME to Help and i told him about my HERPES illness he told me not to worry about,that he is going to send me his herbal medicine and actually he did.i took the medicine just as prescribe by him, he told me to go for check up in the hospital which i did and to my great surprise my Doctor told me the Herpes Virus was no longer there, all thank to you sir Dr CHUKWU MADU HERBAL HOME, contact his WhatsApp Number: +2347030936239 .His email: dr.chukwumaduherbalhome@gmail.com. His herbs are very powerful and has no side effects. He can cured all kinds of Viruses, diseases, sicknesses.