https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/covid-19-vaccine-breakthrough-case-1.6063210
N.B. should reveal COVID case numbers among those vaccinated, experts say
Nova Scotia, Alberta already reporting numbers of vaccinated people who test positive for COVID-19
CBC deleted a lot of comments then banned my ID before I could save anything These are the last comments of mine that still remain after the dust had settled 6 months ago and my ID is allowed to post again
328 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story
Commenting is now closed for this story
Ferdinand Boudreau
I would think should be at 75% either Monday or Tuesday. If not its close enough and let move on.
SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Ferdinand
Boudreau: One thing that's happening June 14-18 is students 12-15 being
bused to clinics for first doses. That will add to the numbers - we're
likely to end up with > 75%.
SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Randy
McNally: Per the GNB website, students will need a consent form signed
by their parents and a Medicare card to be vaccinated.
SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Randy
McNally: "Thanks for that because children are known to forge their
parents signatures from time to time but the medicare cards would
present a bit more of a challenge." - Ha! I thought the same time.
Yeah, I was that kind of kid. :-) The other thing may happen too -
consent forms and Medicare cards getting conveniently "lost" on the way
to school among kids who don't want to be vaccinated.
The other thing to be aware of is that under the NB Medical Consent of Minors Act, children under 16 who are assessed by a medical professional as being sufficiently "mature" can consent to medical treatments and procedures on their own. However, at this time at least the government appears to be seeking parental consent for COVID vaccinations.
The other thing to be aware of is that under the NB Medical Consent of Minors Act, children under 16 who are assessed by a medical professional as being sufficiently "mature" can consent to medical treatments and procedures on their own. However, at this time at least the government appears to be seeking parental consent for COVID vaccinations.
David Amos
Reply to @Randy
McNally: Methinks Higgy et al are confused by the fact that I am
giggling at the fact that they illegally denied my right to renew my
Medicare Card for many years Hence I can sue them anytime I wish.
However in the Mean" Time I can't be jabbed with their experimental
concoction even if I wanted to because I don't posses a current Medicare
Card they demand Catch 22 N'esy Pas?
Vincent Furnier
Reply to @David Amos:
Why don't you just sue them and get it over with? All you ever complain
about is how you're going to sue the government for some crazy
perceived slight against you. Jeez just do it all ready.
Samantha Jones
Come on people!
John Grail
Reply to @Samantha Jones: Yeah really. Wake up and smell the government coercion!
JOhn D
Bond
Reply to @John Grail:
Interesting people are lining up, booking appointments for the vaccine.
Does not appear to be coercion. It seems most believe that the vaccines
are helpful in mitigating the effects of this virus. If you are part of
the crowd that doesn't believe we need the vaccines that all will be
fine without them. Well I guess there are always those on the fringe
that feel left out or pressured when in reality there is none.
John Grail
Reply to @JOhn D Bond: Oh please. Holding freedom over people's heads? Come on John...
JOhn D
Bond
Reply to @John Grail: Again thou dost protest too much
David Amos
Reply to @JOhn D
Bond: Methinks you are the wannabe lawyer dude who doth protest too much
about Mr Grail's right to his post his opinions N'esy Pas?
JOhn D
Bond
Reply to @John Grail: No one is holding freedom over peoples head. That may be your interpretation, but not the majorities.
John Grail
Reply to @JOhn D
Bond: By closing borders, stores, stay at home orders, etc. those are
all restrictions of freedoms. Namely freedom of assembly.
JOhn D
Bond
Reply to @John Grail:
True except you neglect to mention that the governments invoked the
emergency measures act that provides them with the latitude to restrict
those freedoms temporarily in the event of an emergency. So nothing to
do with penalizing 1 group over the other. We are all being treated
equally
Terry
Tibbs
Reply to @JOhn D Bond:
None of those other places have the 3 stooges attempting to run things. NONE of them would put up the non-stop BS coming from the 3 stooges and there would likely be marching in the streets if they were subjected to this BS.
Here in NB, between the government, and the Irvings, the population is properly cowed.
None of those other places have the 3 stooges attempting to run things. NONE of them would put up the non-stop BS coming from the 3 stooges and there would likely be marching in the streets if they were subjected to this BS.
Here in NB, between the government, and the Irvings, the population is properly cowed.
JOhn D
Bond
Reply to @Terry Tibbs:
I suggest that is a tainted view. In each of those other jurisdictions
on a comparative basis, their health care systems are much better. They
have elasticity in the staffing with more than adequate resources than
we have in NB. We certainly could have reopened at 60% but if we were to
get a 100 cases with 75 of them requiring ICU beds and ventilators we
would be past the breaking point.
The reason for our relative success compared to other jurisdictions is that we have remained steadfast on the controls. Is it a pain in the A,,, Yes but it has worked and at the end of the day the extra few days is really not a material issue in my mind.
The reason for our relative success compared to other jurisdictions is that we have remained steadfast on the controls. Is it a pain in the A,,, Yes but it has worked and at the end of the day the extra few days is really not a material issue in my mind.
Terry
Tibbs
Reply to @JOhn D Bond:
And whose fault is that?
We continue to give our natural resources, that should be funding health care, to the Irvings.
But wait, the perfect excuse is currently happening for Mr Higgs to take a bow over increased revenues, inflated house prices are going to drive up residential taxes (but not commercial, or woodland, taxes). Happy trails.
And whose fault is that?
We continue to give our natural resources, that should be funding health care, to the Irvings.
But wait, the perfect excuse is currently happening for Mr Higgs to take a bow over increased revenues, inflated house prices are going to drive up residential taxes (but not commercial, or woodland, taxes). Happy trails.
David Amos
Reply to @Terry
Tibbs: Methinks Higgy's bosses and their greasy gassy oily buddies in
Texas ain't very Happy Happy Happy these days N'esy Pas?
Paul Estey Reply to @James Smythe: enough of conspiracy theories...pleas explain how the numbers have been fudged!
Keep us locked in we are still . 4 % too dangerous. By tomorrow a miracle will arrive…the sweet 75
David Amos
Reply to @Paul Estey: I repeat Are you the former member of the Fat Fed City Finest???
John Grail
Here we go again...Seems like every day they are trying to create discord among Canadians.
JOhn D
Bond
Reply to @John Grail:
Hardly they are providing updates to the majority of Canadians that
want to be kept up to date. Perhaps causes discord for those that think
they know better.
Jay Forner
Reply to @John Grail: Grail is right, Bond is not.
Tim Jones
Reply to @Jay Forner: It is time for a common sense revolution in this country.
Don Corey
Reply to @Jay Forner: No, you are wrong. He is right on.
Tim Jones
Reply to @Wendell
Bouchard: please explain! I've followed the rules, I've done my part,
I've studied the numbers and recognize that the country lacks a certain
amount of common sense. I'm well known for mine, but your observation
from one or two posts surely must be worth hearing. Please feel free to
elaborate rather than simply try to intimidate and bully with childish
one-liners. If it's a right-vs-left ideology argument then you've
likely said the most you're capable of.
John Grail
Reply to @JOhn D Bond: Yes, you think you know better because you are appealing to the majority...
John Grail
Reply to @Don Corey: How is he right? Higgs has been scapegoating people from day one!
John Grail
Reply to @JOhn D Bond: Even if my comments are only half true they are still more true than your comments
David Amos
Reply to @John Grail & @Wendell Bouchard : BINGO
Roy Kirk
Reply to @Jay Forner: citing scripture now?
Roy Kirk
Reply to @Don Corey: you must be reading from a different holy book
Wendell Bouchard
Reply to @Tim Jones:
Nothing to do with politics. No point in me saying much, nine out of
ten of my posts get eliminated. This one likely will too.
Jay Forner
Reply to @Don Corey: sources???
Jay Forner
Reply to @Tim Jones: Your talking to a Timmy.
John Grail
Reply to @JOhn D
Bond: You are the one that started the personal insults. Simply because
you can't debate in a civilized and rational way don't keep taking it
out on me...
David Amos
Reply to @John Grail: Well put
JOhn D
Bond
Reply to @John Grail:
"more true than your comments" guess this is now a conversation of 12
yr old's. Hilarious more right that wrong. I have to ask. What precisely
is the evaluation criteria you are using? Clearly it is not the body of
evidence being provided by experts and governments globally or the
regulatory bodies.
JOhn D
Bond
Reply to @John Grail:
Its not about a debate, it is about being grounded in reality. The
overwhelming body of evidence that shows the vaccines are safe. That our
governments are doing what they were elected to do. Keep people
informed on the progress of major initiatives undertaken by the
government on behalf of the voters. That you do not agree personally is
fine, that you try to discount all the steps the government is taking is
not fine.
John Grail
Reply to @JOhn D
Bond: It has nothing to do with safety (well very little). Since when
have I made any major argument about my decision not to get vaccinated
based on that?
John Grail
Reply to @JOhn D Bond: The fact you cannot even seem to read what I am replying to you is telling...
John Grail
Reply to @JOhn D Bond: I was not the one who started flinging ad hominem attacks. You were.
Tim Jones
Here
we go! So we are 0.4% away from 75% and they won't allow us the
carrot! However, when we hit 75%, we are opening to Cumberland County,
whom I believe has less than 70% vaccinated. Let's not forget the
snowbirds that we haven't quite figured out a way to count how many have
been vaccinated, but we had no difficulty tracking their infections and
using that number to add to our own and instil unwarranted fear in the
populous (bear in mind that these out-of-province infections were hidden
from us at the beginning and just recently published with true
transparency). I did my part, I am not an anti-vaxxer, I have both
shots. I participated, wore my mask, stayed away from my friends....
but is there any surprise that many of us are simply done with it and
can't be bothered with the rules any longer? Anyone else tired of
Russel, HIggs, and Cardy wagging their fingers at us and reading from a
script that sounds like a grade 9 oral report designed to shame and
patronize us? Live your lives people, stop shaming each other, stop
worrying, we did our part, we flattened the curve 70 weeks ago. Show
them who they work for.
Jay Forner
Reply to @Tim Jones: perfectly said!!
Sherrie McLean
Reply to @Tim Jones: what about those who have already had covid? Or do they just ignore that little bit of science?
David Amos
Reply to @Sherrie McLean: Well put
Terry Tibbs
Reply to @Sherrie McLean:
If you haven't noticed this affair is about 40% science and about 60% political.
If you haven't noticed this affair is about 40% science and about 60% political.
David Amos
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: Cui Bono???
Methinks everything is political and its always about the money so I always ask myself that simple question out of the gates (small pun) for obvious reasons particularly after my dealings with the WHO FLU and Dr Russell's predecessors in GNB 2009 N'esy Pas?
Methinks everything is political and its always about the money so I always ask myself that simple question out of the gates (small pun) for obvious reasons particularly after my dealings with the WHO FLU and Dr Russell's predecessors in GNB 2009 N'esy Pas?
Louis Leger
Reply to @Tim Jones:
It's obvious that many of the commenters here would flip all their
marbles if suddenly it was god enough to end a hockey period at 19:47
instead of 20:00.
Michael Collins
let's just round up like they do at the cash register.
Tim Jones
Reply to @Michael Collins: It's good enough for taking our money, but not enough to restore our liberties.
Peter G Bourne
Reply to @Tim Jones: Liberties?!
David Amos
Reply to @Peter G Bourne: Good question
Tim Jones
Reply to @Peter G
Bourne: sorry, I forgot there was a large contingent of people who don't
understand big words, let me define: Liberty: the state of being free
within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on
one's way of life, behavior, or political views.
SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Tim Jones:
The wiggle word in there is "oppressive." Some people consider traffic
signals to be oppressive, while others consider them to be a reasonable
way of decreasing traffic accidents. For almost any regulation you can
come up with, someone is going to claim it's oppressive and someone else
is going to claim it's good sense.
John Grail
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: Who considers traffic signals oppressive?
David Amos
Reply to @John Grail: I do
Jay Forner
Until the lift the crazy mask mandate. This is all useless.
John Montgomery
Reply to @Jay Forner: They are doing this so they can lift the mask mandate.
David Amos
Reply to @John Montgomery: Dream on
Jay Forner
Reply to @John
Montgomery: and before you know it! They won't happen. Haven't you seen
the pattern the last 15 months. They'll give ya a week.....then shit it
down because cases went up....or a new variant is coming....haha. just
enough to keep ya guessing. Fooled.
Robin Morin
Reply to @John Montgomery:
Keep leaping towards that carrot, John.
Keep leaping towards that carrot, John.
David Amos
Reply to @Robin Morin: Well put
Troy
Thomas
Can someone answer me this question…if I don’t get the vaccine who does that hurt other than me ?
Peter G
Bourne
Reply to @Troy Thomas: You
would be more susceptible to the virus, thereby increasing the chance to
pass it on. Seems pretty obvious ...
Paul Estey
Reply to @Troy
Thomas: I believe this question has been answered many times...if you
were infected you can pass it along to others, even those that have been
vaccinated as no vaccine is 100 %...its not rocket science
Steve Simonds
Reply to @Troy
Thomas: YOu can cost the system a lot of money like these guys are
doing. MB is overrun with Covid patients, so they shipped patients to 3
other provinces. One died on the air ambulance pad, just an hour or so
after he walked into a Winnipeg hospital https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/winkler-doctor-hospital-vaccine-hesitancy-1.6044904?fbclid=IwAR3uaHH3Pgq67MLwxNZqITip4-b6L0E0dQ-5erFb-by5B83UB5UiKEBVjAI.
SarahRose
Werner
Reply to @Peter G
Bourne: But who would Troy pass it on to, other than people who have
also made the choice not to be vaccinated? The answer is, of course,
that vaccination does not provide 100% protection. This is especially
true in people with a weakened immune response, such as seniors. So
Troy could in fact pass the virus on to someone who's been vaccinated
twice. The other issue is that a pool of unvaccinated people is a pool
in which new variants can develop.
Me personally, I think that everyone should be able to choose whether or not to get vaccinated. However, it's not 100% without risks to others. Making that choice may have consequences such as being unable to travel internationally, being unable to get certain kinds of jobs, etc.
Me personally, I think that everyone should be able to choose whether or not to get vaccinated. However, it's not 100% without risks to others. Making that choice may have consequences such as being unable to travel internationally, being unable to get certain kinds of jobs, etc.
Myc Baker
Reply to @Steve Simonds: always on brand
Steve Simonds
Reply to @SarahRose
Werner: Besides the cost to the system of dealing with his disease,
there are breakthrough Covid infections that non vaxxed infected people
carry, and which can infect and kill a few fully vaxxed people.
Myc Baker
Reply to @Steve
Simonds: suppose you have documented proof of this statement…I’ll wait
for you to post the same link you always post
SarahRose
Werner
Reply to @Steve Simonds: As I said, the vaccine does not provide 100% protection.
Myc Baker
Reply to @Steve
Simonds: how about this stat…100% of confirmed cases on the Celebrity
Millennium are from vaxed individuals…stats are stats nesy pas?
Sherrie
McLean
Reply to @Peter G Bourne: pass it on to a vaccinated person?
Sherrie
McLean
Reply to @Steve
Simonds: imagine the cost that the obesity, lack of exercise, smoking,
alcohol abuse, poor diet has on the healthcare system!
Graeme Scott
Reply to @SarahRose
Werner: Thoughtful post and well balanced. The way I see you certainly
have the right to refuse to be vaccinated but not the right to expect no
consequences from that decision.
Roy Kirk
Reply to @Myc Baker: Figures don't lie, but . . .
2 out of 500 passengers, 95% of which were fully faxed, according to ctv
2 out of 500 passengers, 95% of which were fully faxed, according to ctv
Troy
Thomas
Reply to @SarahRose
Werner: my understanding is if you get vaccinated you can still get
covid and give it to anyone including vaccinated people…so I see no
difference between vaccinated and non vaccinated people…so the issue is
the health care system ,that a percentage of my tax dollars pay for…I’m
heathy and a very low risk of even getting anything any more than a mild
flu like symptoms at least that’s what the numbers say…so the issue is I
“ might “ need the health care I pay for ?
Troy
Thomas
Reply to @Peter G
Bourne: did you not hear the vaccination doesn’t stop you from getting
covid or spreading it…you must be a rocket scientist too
Steve Simonds
Reply to @Troy Thomas: There is no dilemma when determining this line to draw. Get the vax and stop infecting others.
Steve Simonds
Reply to @Troy Thomas: Do you have anything more recent than this? https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/yes-vaccines-block-most-transmission-of-covid-19
Troy
Thomas
Reply to @Steve Simonds: sounds like this isn’t going to go away even for all you vaccinated people
SarahRose
Werner
Reply to @Troy
Thomas: "my understanding is if you get vaccinated you can still get
covid and give it to anyone including vaccinated people" - Correct.
"...so I see no difference between vaccinated and non vaccinated people"
- Incorrect. Once you're vaccinated, your risks of transmitting the
vaccine are reduced. You therefore present less of a risk to other
people. That's the difference.
Steve Simonds
Reply to @SarahRose
Werner: I tried to post an April 21 article from Science magazine that
said Pfizer prevents transmission. but it is under moderation.
George
Jones
Reply to @Troy Thomas:
You are right on.. If vaccinated or un vaccinated it still spreads.
Transmission will always be there with the new technology. In the old
and the compromised as well as healthy people the efficacy can be quite
low as experts have said many times especially with the India variant
but there are more nasty ones on the horizon.. The way of the invented
virus I suppose.. Both sides are very courageous in their choice.. There
are no winners at this moment in time.. The alternatives have made a
good dent in a positive way.. So whether you decide for the experiment
or not everything appears to be what it is.. There is no guarantee as
far as the future goes....
SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Troy
Thomas: No, it's not going to "go away." The purpose of vaccination is
to reduce (not eliminate) transmission, hospitalizations and deaths. I
got vaccinated (just one dose so far, 2nd one coming July 7) in order to
reduce my risk of having a severe or fatal case. If it doesn't for
you, that's fine, but you might find there are consequences to your
choice, as I mentioned above.
Steve
Simonds
Reply to @George Jones: April 21 article says most transmission is blocked.
Howard
O'Toole
Reply to @Myc Baker:
regarding the 2 cases on the Celebrity Millennium, remember we don't
know all the pertinent information regarding the vaccination status of
every passenger. 95% of the 500 guests were supposed to be vaccinated
and all were tested within 72 hours of departure. However guests who
couldn't receive the vaccine such as children, were not vaccinated. The
two positive cases at the end of the cruise were asymptomatic, which
obviously is the goal of the vaccines. So they did seem to prevent
serious illness and hospitalization. And keep in mind we have no
information on ages and health status of the two. This is not
necessarily evidence of vaccine failure.
SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Steve
Simonds: Not finding the April 21 article. There's an article from 30
Mar 2021 that says that studies suggest that fully vaccinated people
pose a low risk of transmitting the virus. Note "suggest" and "low" (vs
"no"). Nature magazine mentions a study published 30 Apr 2021 that
says one dose can halve transmission risks.
George
Jones
Reply to @Howard
O'Toole: It will be years before all the pertinent info comes in...At
some point I say the fall things will change back to some form of
normalcy.. The new technology is not a cure and not even close to the
vaccines that have been around for a long time... Some experts are
saying the new technology will catch up the to the number of deaths from
the people that died from complications of Sars Cov 2.. As far as
transmission with the Delta variant it is 50% or less depending on ones
immune system...
SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Steve
Simonds: "Taken together, the evidence shows that full vaccination with
either mRNA vaccine cuts risk of infection by at least half after one
dose, and by 75 to 90 percent two weeks after the second dose." - 75 to
90 percent is fantastic! I'm delighted to read this. However, it's not
100%.
Troy Thomas
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: right my choice
Steve
Simonds
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: I'm also delighted. I hadn't googled it in the last 4 months.
Steve
Simonds
Reply to @Troy
Thomas: If it's your choice to infect others, you have lots of time to
argue with the premier because C isn't going away. I'm delighted that
you spurred me to Google for an update.
George
Jones
Reply to @Steve Simonds: They are still guesses at this time.. For every article there is an opposite one..
David Amos
Reply to @George
Jones: Good Morning Mr Jones Please enjoy a little Deja Vu of some of
your words yesterday Methinks they are well worth repeating Nesy Pas?
"Here is a test.. Put three masks over your face. Then put your glasses in front of your masks and blow into them.. They will fog up.. that tells ya something...."
"Here is a test.. Put three masks over your face. Then put your glasses in front of your masks and blow into them.. They will fog up.. that tells ya something...."
George
Jones
Reply to @George
Jones: A lot of info out there from both sides of the fence...Trust is
out the window in a lot of articles looking at even both sides.. Some
continue to sleep though......
Maxime
Babineau
Reply to @David Amos:
I have to ask because every time I read your comments I find them
interesting but then I always think that you are making fun of, us being
francophones. Methinks and n'esy pas why do you have to say that?
Steve
Simonds
Reply to @George Jones: How about providing the opposite article instead of just making that claim.
Jay Forner
Reply to @Peter G
Bourne: U had the shot though? Pass it on to who? Another person who
chose not to vaccinated, I guess they'll take their chances and live
with the high recovery rate. Oh wait....gonna strain the health system?.
They couldn't strain it with fudged numbers to begin with .Jay Forner
Reply to @Steve
Simonds: strain the system. You've drank their kool-aid. It worked. The
system was way more strained prior. They even tried to fudge the number
and it just isant adding up. Wait for it. Another 90 year old on the
way.
George
Jones
Reply to @Maxime
Babineau: Maxime there is no intent for being hurtful from Dave.. He
cares.. He has put himself out there concerning all of us.. He keeps
gobbermment on their toes.. I've read a few of his comments that went
back and forth with the government. I have 32% francais in me and I
don't see any of that in Dave.. I must admit though that we have to come
up with better ways of dealing with the French English issue.. One
example having one French child going on a school bus and passing a full
English bus plus..
George
Jones
Reply to @Jay Forner: So true...
Jay Forner
Reply to @George Jones: I love your music brother!! :;
Michael Cain
Reply to @Troy Thomas: do what you want, but respect others, keep your distance and wear a mask
Troy Thomas
Reply to @Sherrie
McLean: great confidence in the vaccine….if I get vaccinated it will
make Steve Simtones vaccine gooder right Steven
Troy Thomas
Reply to @Steve Simonds: if I get vaccinated Steve will it make your vaccination gooder
Troy Thomas
Reply to @SarahRose
Werner: I’m guessing these studies are a lot of guessing too…remember
originally wearing a mask didn’t help now it’s our saviour…these guys
running the show are guessing and hoping they are right.
David Amos
Reply to @Maxime Babineau: I did reply
Maxime Babineau
Reply to @George
Jones: The bus for one French kid is an urban myth, never happened and
would never happen. Go right ahead, put all the children on one bus.
Guess what would happen? Would the driver have to be bilingual? Who will
complain then?
Maxime Babineau
Reply to @David Amos: Never saw it. Was it deactivated?
David Amos
Reply to @Maxime Babineau: Yup
Billy
Popamahovilich
Reply to @Myc Baker: and from the CBC no less.
Billy
Popamahovilich
Reply to @Roy Kirk: ANother reliable source. CTV
Roy Kirk
Reply to @Billy
Popamahovilich: more reliable and better informed then someone posting
here that a hundred percent of the cases on the ship have been
vaccinated. Without any supporting information.
Jon Berry
Reply to @Troy
Thomas: Vaccination is your choice/right, only you can decide. But
remember some of your freedoms may be very restricted while still
remains to be seen.
David Amos
Reply to @Jon Berry:
Methinks everybody with two clues between their ears knows our freedoms
have been illegally restricted for way past too long. Hence Higgy et al
sought immunity for their minions after they had willfully practiced
many wrongs under a Doctor's dubious orders for over a year N'esy Pas?
Louis Leger
Reply to @Troy
Thomas: It depends in your lifestyle. If you never leave your house
under any circumstances, then it doesn't matter what you do in any
regard. If however you do take part in society, then there are basic
things that you can do to help people around you, or at the very least
not make their situation worse.
Dan Roy
David Amos
Reply to @Dan Roy: Surely you jest
Jackie Barrett
Reply to @Dan Roy:
That's the problem with Higgs and Russell, they are too rigid as opposed
to being a little flexible like other provinces are doing.
john carter
Reply to @Dan Roy:
It really is a joke isn't it.
It really is a joke isn't it.
Lou Bell
Reply to @Jackie Barrett: Like Nova Scotia ! RIGHT ???
David Amos
Reply to @john carter: Yup
Roy Kirk
The
Province on the whole is doing well; very close to the Target. How
about the legislature? Have they been able to achieve the same Target?
Or are they holding us back?
Lou Bell
Reply to @Roy Kirk: Like everyone else , that would be a PRIVATE matter . They're not obligated to say .
David Amos
Reply to @Lou Bell: So you say
Frank
MacPhee
Can anyone confirm that: starting tomorrow, anyone who had one dose on or before April 30 can book their 2nd doseReply to @Frank
MacPhee: Iirc, yes....and on June 21, anyone who had their first dose 28
days before that can book a second appointment.
Reply to @Frank
MacPhee: Google "covid-19 vaccines" "second dose clinics". You're
looking for the page titled "COVID-19 Vaccines - Government of New
Brunswick." Open that page and click "Second dose clinics" towards the
right-hand side of the page.
Reply to @Bob Smith: My wife and I got our first shot in mid May.
The pharmacist gave us our next appointment in mid August as soon as she finished the shots.
The pharmacist gave us our next appointment in mid August as soon as she finished the shots.
Reply to @Frank
MacPhee: That's what the NB government web page says. As of June 14th
those who received their first vaccination in APRIL after the 1st.
Reply to @Wendell
Bouchard: If you want it sooner, try calling on or after June 21 to see
if you can rebook. Starting that date anyone who's had their first shot
at least 28 days before can book an appointment for a second dose.
Reply to @Kate
LeBlanc: I doubt anyone who had their first shot before April 1 and who
hasn't made an appointment for a second shot yet would be turned down.
:-)
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: Intend to do just that.
Reply to @SarahRose
Werner: The web page says anyone who had their first shot before April 1
are eligible. Anybody after in April is June 14th. I spoke with someone
at Public Health and the time frame between shots is about 8 weeks.
Reply to @Kate
LeBlanc: I got my first shot April 21 and have an appointment to get my
second on July 7, i.e. 11 weeks. Certainly Public Health was
encouraging anyone who got their first shot before April 1 to call last
week for an appointment. But I would hardly think that if someone who
got their first shot in March called this coming week instead, they'd be
told, sorry, you missed your chance, you don't get a second shot. That
wouldn't make any sense.
David Amos
Reply to @Wendell
Bouchard: Methinks Higgy et al trust that I am overjoyed about the news
you freely offer about health concerns that should be a matter of your
family's personal privacy N'esy Pas?
Harvey York
Reply to @David Amos:
says the guy who's on here daily complaining about his lack of
Medicare. Perhaps Higgy et al are overjoyed about the news you freely
offer up
David Amos
Reply to @Harvey York: BINGO
Harvey York
Reply to @David Amos: too easy. Nobody cares
David Amos
Reply to @Harvey York: Clearly you do
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: I'm getting it today 9 weeks from my first.
No comments:
Post a Comment