Wednesday, 4 August 2021

Biden announced on November 12 that Ron Klain would serve as White House Chief of Staff

 

Ron Klain
RonKlain-600x400 (cropped).jpg

30th White House Chief of Staff
Assumed office
January 20, 2021
PresidentJoe Biden
DeputyJen O'Malley Dillon
Bruce Reed
Preceded byMark Meadows
White House Ebola Response Coordinator
In office
October 22, 2014 – February 15, 2015
PresidentBarack Obama
Preceded byPosition established
Succeeded byPosition abolished
Chief of Staff to the Vice President
In office
January 20, 2009 – January 14, 2011
Vice PresidentJoe Biden
Preceded byDavid Addington
Succeeded byBruce Reed
In office
November 1, 1995 – August 3, 1999
Vice PresidentAl Gore
Preceded byJack Quinn
Succeeded byCharles Burson
Personal details
Born
Ronald Alan Klain[1]

August 8, 1961 (age 59)[2]
Indianapolis, Indiana, U.S.
Political partyDemocratic
Spouse(s)Monica Medina
Children3
EducationGeorgetown University (AB)
Harvard University (JD)

 

Ronald Alan Klain (/ˈkln/ KLAYN; born August 8, 1961) is an American attorney, political consultant, and former lobbyist serving as White House chief of staff under President Joe Biden. A Democrat, he was previously chief of staff to two vice presidents, Al Gore from 1995 to 1999 and Biden from 2009 to 2011. He was also appointed by President Obama as White House Ebola Response Coordinator after the appearance of Ebola virus cases in the United States, serving from 2014 to 2015.[3] Throughout 2020 he worked as a senior advisor to Biden's presidential campaign.[4][5] Following his victory, Biden announced on November 12 that Klain would serve as White House chief of staff.[6][7]

 

 ---------- Original message ----------
From: Ron Klain <ron.klain@revolution.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 04:55:06 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Erin O'Toole are you still suing Daniel Bordman???
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

I am no longer employed at Revolution.  If you are contacting me about
a Revolution-related legal matter, please contact Song Pak, at
Song.Pak@revolution.com.  If you are inquiring about any other
Revolution matter, please contact Marissa Secreto at
Marissa.Secreto@revolution.com.  If your inquiry is about a transition
related matter, please contact Dev Freeland, at
DBerryFreeland@jbrpt.org.

Thank you,
Ron Klain

 

David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

RE Fifteen Signs You’re in an Abusive Relationship with the Government

David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 9:22 PM
To: lou.eastman@aier.org, Amelia.Janaskie@aier.org, Micha.Gartz@aier.org
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Bcc: myson333 <myson333@yahoo.com>
https://www.aier.org/article/fifteen-signs-youre-in-an-abusive-relationship-with-the-government/


Fifteen Signs You’re in an Abusive Relationship with the Government
Lucio Saverio-Eastman Micha Gartz
– December 31, 2020

---------- Original message ----------
From: noreply@wisconsin.gov
Date: 25 Dec 2020 00:14:48 -0600
Subject: Your message has been received
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Thank you for contacting my office. I appreciate hearing your
thoughts, concerns and ideas.

If you are reaching out to my office about COVID-19, you can find the
most accurate, current information about the status of COVID-19 in
Wisconsin at the Wisconsin Department of Health Services’ website
(https://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/covid-19/index.htm). As governor, it is
my top priority to ensure folks across our state have access to the
most up-to-date information available so you have the resources you
need to make informed decisions to keep yourself, your family, and our
neighbors and communities safe.

The best way to prevent illness is to avoid being exposed to this
virus. Please follow guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), current as of April 16, 2020, to help take
preventative steps that will limit your exposure and protect yourself
from COVID-19:
•       Stay home as much as possible and avoid close contact with others
•       Wear a cloth face covering that covers your nose and mouth in public settings
•       Clean and disinfect frequently touched objects and surfaces
•       Wash your hands often with soap and water for at least 20 seconds,
especially after going to the bathroom; before eating; and after
blowing your nose, coughing, or sneezing.
o       If soap and water are not readily available, use an alcohol-based
hand sanitizer with at least 60% alcohol. Always wash your hands with
soap and water if they are visibly dirty.
o       For information about handwashing, see the CDC’s Handwashing website.
o       For information specific to healthcare providers, see the CDC’s Hand
Hygiene in Healthcare Settings.
•       Stay home if you are sick, except to get medical care.
My office receives thousands of letters, emails, and phone calls every
day, but I want you to know that we are working on responding to your
message.

Again, thank you for contacting my office. It is an honor to serve you
and to represent the people of our state.

Tony Evers
Governor


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Gonski, Sarah R. (Perkins Coie)" <SGonski@perkinscoie.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 06:14:55 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Sidney Powell et al I just called your
office in Texas and many of your associates within the Dec 11th
filings
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I am out of the virtual office until Monday, December 28 and my
response to your email will be delayed. If you need immediate
assistance, please contact my assistant at dgraziano@perkinscoie.com
or 602-351-8078 and he will connect you with another member of the
Political Law Group.

Thank you,
Sarah



______________________________
__

NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other
confidential information. If you have received it in error, please
advise the sender by reply email and immediately delete the message
and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank
you.





---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Press <Press@usdoj.gov>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 06:16:10 +0000
Subject: Automatic Reply:  Press@usdoj.gov
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting the Department of Justice's Office of Public
Affairs.  Inquiries sent to this mailbox are no longer monitored.

To submit an inquiry, please visit
www.justice.gov/media<http://www.justice.gov/media>.  Inquiries made
via this form will be checked every 30 minutes from 9:00am – 6:00pm,
Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays.

To submit an RSVP for an event, please visit
www.justice.gov/MediaRSVP<http://www.justice.gov/MediaRSVP>.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 06:18:16 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Sidney Powell et al I just called your
office in Texas and many of your associates within the Dec 11th
filings
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for taking the time to write to us.

Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
understanding.

If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.

If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144.

Thank you.


Bonjour,

Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.

Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
veuillez visiter
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.

S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.

Merci.


Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000
Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
Brunswick
E3B 5H1
Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premierministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 02:14:39 -0400
Subject: Fwd: ATTN Sidney Powell et al I just called your office in
Texas and many of your associates within the Dec 11th filings
To: afoster@az.gov, bwjohnson@swlaw.com, cahler@swlaw.com,
dflint@swlaw.com, ijoyce@swlaw.com, governorsoffice@michigan.gov,
ccarr@law.ga.gov, dnessel@michigan.gov, kenneth.paxton@oag.texas.gov,
EversInfo@wisconsin.gov, attorneygeneral@doj.nh.gov,
kauljl@doj.state.wi.us, press@usdoj.gov, stateofcorruptionnh1
<stateofcorruptionnh1@gmail.com>, DSakowich@hearst.com, "Boston.Mail"
<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, "ed.pilkington"
<ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>
, editor <editor@wikileaks.org>, premier
<premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>,
"andrea.anderson-mason" <andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>
,
attorneygeneral <attorneygeneral@ontario.ca>, awilder@azleg.gov,
MarkFinchem@me.com, NBarto@azleg.gov, ADanneman@perkinscoie.com,
SGonski@perkinscoie.com, MElias@perkinscoie.com,
BSpiva@perkinscoie.com, JDevaney@perkinscoie.com,
JGeise@perkinscoie.com, LHill@perkinscoie.com,
HerreraR@ballardspahr.com, ArellanoD@ballardspahr.com,
kellyjtownsend@yahoo.com, liddyt@mcao.maricopa.gov,
craigere@mcao.maricopa.gov, vigilj@mcao.maricopa.gov,
brancoj@mcao.maricopa.gov, laruej@mcao.maricopa.gov,
ca-civilmailbox@mcao.maricopa.gov, rdesai@cblawyers.com,
agaona@cblawyers.com, kyost@cblawyers.com, jnelson@susmangodfrey.com,
smorrissey@susmangodfrey.com, sshackelford@susmangodfrey.com,
dbrook@susmangodfrey.com, michael.c.herron@dartmouth.edu,
jrodden@stanford.edu, sda@gov.harvard.edu, king-assist@iq.harvard.edu,
King@harvard.edu
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>,
1AP.admin@protonmail.com, govcorrespcrm@pa.gov,
jshapiro@attorneygeneral.gov, Alexander.Kolodin@kolodinlaw.com,
CViskovic@kolodinlaw.com

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 16:27:43 -0400
Subject: Fwd: ATTN Sidney Powell et al I just called your office in
Texas and many of your associates within the Dec 11th filings
To: sidney@federalappeals.com, howard@kleinhendler.com,
lwood@fightback.law, attorneystefanielambert@gmail.com,
eldridge@millercanfield.com, dshare@bsdd.com,
erosenberg@lawyerscommittee.org, jgreenbaum@lawyerscommittee.org,
grille@michigan.gov, dbressack@finkbressack.com, aap43@hotmail.com,
megurewitz@gmail.com, James@jamesfetzer.com, info@lionelmedia.com,
liveneedtoknow@gmail.com, tips@steeltruth.com, media@steeltruth.com,
press@deepcapture.com, bbachrach <bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>, Norman
Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "ron.klain"
<ron.klain@revolution.com>, bgaier@finance-commerce.com,
fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca,
info@thomasmoresociety.org, info@rleighfrostlaw.com,
cferrara@thomasmoresociety.org, kaardal@mklaw.com,
mjnew@nationalreview.com, info@aul.org, pr@cato.org, "robert.frater"
<robert.frater@justice.gc.ca>, keith.ward@justice.gc.ca, "jan.jensen"
<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, cxiong@startribune.com

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 19:07:58 +0000
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
Justice and Attorney General of Canada.

Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please
note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured
that your message will be carefully reviewed.

We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.

-------------------

Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
Justice et procureur général du Canada.

En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
avec soin.

Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 19:08:11 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: FWD ATTN Sidney Powell et al I just called
your office in Texas and many of your associates within the Dec 11th
filings
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.

Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
office hours, both over the phone and via email.

Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en

Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.

Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus>

Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
as possible.

Best,


MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>

**
Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.

Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
que par courrier ?lectronique.

En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
site:https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr

En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
courrier ?lectronique.

Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
site : http://www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus

Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.

Cordialement,

Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
< mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 19:11:47 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: FWD ATTN Sidney Powell et al I just called
your office in Texas and many of your associates within the Dec 11th
filings
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>

Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com

This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.

Below is a true copy of my latest email It was sent today to Sidney
 Powell byway of her webpage format The lawyers found below will get
 regular email just like I have done with you people (I already called
 them all and spoke to some and left messages with the rest)


Perhaps all you lawyers should check my work from years ago and call
me back  ASAP???

https://www.scribd.com/doc/265620671/Cross-Border-Txt


On 12/13/20, Pam Stavropoulos <pstavropoulos@iprimus.com.au> wrote:
> Thank you David!
>
> Really appreciate wide dissemination of these concerns as you clearly
> recognise.
>
> Regards,
>
> Pam S.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Raymond Amos <pstavropoulos@iprimus.com.au>
> Sent: Monday, 14 December 2020 2:16 PM
> To: pstavropoulos@iprimus.com.au
> Subject: Contact Form submission from
> http://pamstavropoulos.com.au/contact/
>
> Sender's name: David Raymond Amos
> E-mail: David.Raymond.Amos333@gmail.com
> Phone: 506 434 8433
>
> Message: ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos
> Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 23:14:01 -0400
> Subject: ATTN Yanis Varoufakis and Pam Stavropoulos I just tweeted about
> your concerns about Julian Assange and global economy etc
> To: y.varoufakis@parliament.gr
> Cc: motomaniac333
>
> Yanis Varoufakis
> Web Site:
>     https://www.yanisvaroufakis.eu
> Email:
>     y.varoufakis@parliament.gr
> Address:
>     Parliament Mansion (Megaro Voulis), GR10021
> Athens / Tel. +30 2103707568 / Fax +30 2103707570.
>
> Check out the attachment for USA litigation over 18 years ago
>
>
> Please notice that the webcasts and transcripts of this hearing went
> missing not long  before the economy crashed in 2008 Find the letter
> fom Spitzer to me on page 12 within the document I offer as
> "Integrity-Yea-Right" and ask yourself why Assaage has never metioned
> me In fact I bet that you folks won't either
>
> https://www.banking.senate.gov/hearings/review-of-current-investigations-and-regulatory-actions-regarding-the-mutual-fund-industry
>
>  Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the
> Mutual Fund Industry
>
> Date:   Thursday, November 20, 2003
>
> Witness Panel 1
>
>     Mr. Stephen M. Cutler
>     Director - Division of Enforcement
>     Securities and Exchange Commission
>           Cutler - November 20, 2003
>     Mr. Robert Glauber
>     Chairman and CEO
>     National Association of Securities Dealers
>           Glauber - November 20, 2003
>     Eliot Spitzer
>     Attorney General
>     State of New York
>           Spitzer - November 20, 2003
>
>
>
> Yanis Varoufakis
> @yanisvaroufakis
> ·
>
> Law and Disorder: The case of Julian Assange - DiEM25
> The conviction of Julian Assange would signify a new dystopian
> landscape in which all investigative journalism risks prosecution.
> diem25.org
>
> David Raymond Amos
> @DavidRaymondAm1
> ·
> 1h
> Perhaps you and I should have a long talk ASAP?
>
> FYI this old pdf file is the tip of the iceberg of things that Bolton
> and Assange have known about yours truly for many years
>
> https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
>
> David Raymond Amos
> @DavidRaymondAm1
> ·
> 41m
> The first link I offer in the blog Greece is among the many that
> received hundreds of documents byway of registered US Mail as I
> returned home to run for public office 6 more times while suing the
> Queen
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2017/08/attn-andrey-dvornikov-tel-7-499-244-32.html
>
> Notice Assange and Trumps lawyer's email before they became famous?
>
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/05/yo-birgitta-who-is-more-of-crook-julian.html
>
> From: Birgitta Jonsdottir
> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:14:02 +0000
> Subject: Re: Bon Soir Birgitta according to my records this is the
> first email I ever sent you
> To: David Amos
>
> dear Dave
> i have got your email and will read through the links as soon as i
> find some time keep up the good fight in the meantime
>
> thank you for bearing with me
> i am literary drowning in requests to look into all sorts of matters
> and at the same time working 150% work at the parliament and
> the creation of a political movement and being a responsible parent:)
> plus all the matters in relation to immi
>
> with oceans of joy
> birgitta
>
> Better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are
> not.
>
> Andre Gide
>
> Birgitta Jonsdottir
> Birkimelur 8, 107 Reykjavik, Iceland, tel: 354 692 8884
> http://this.is/birgittahttp://joyb.blogspot.com -
> http://www.facebook.com/birgitta.jonsdottir
>
>>>> From: "Julian Assange)" editor@wikileaks.org
>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 3:15 PM
>>>> Subject: Al Jazeera on Iceland's plan for a press safe haven
>>>>
>>>> FYI: Al-Jazeera's take on Iceland's proposed media safe haven
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbGiPjIE1pE
>>>>
>>>> More info http://immi.is/
>>>>
>>>> Julian Assange Editor WikiLeaks http://wikileaks.org/
>>>>
>>>> From: "David Amos" david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>> To: "Julian Assange)" editor@wikileaks.org
>>>> Cc: "Dan Fitzgerald" danf@danf.net; "Byrne. G" Byrne.G@parl.gc.ca
>>>> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:35 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: Al Jazeera on Iceland's new plan Thanx Here is
>>>> something
>>>> about Iceland and Banksters Al Jazeera would enjoy
>>>>
>>>> Checkout this old pdf file from 2005 at about page two or three
>>>>
>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/4304560/Speaker-Iceland-etc
>>>>
>>>> Then read on and chuckle
>>>>
>>>> From: postur@fjr.stjr.is
>>>> Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009
>>>> Subject: Re: RE: Iceland and Bankers etc I must ask the obvious
>>>> question. Why have you people ignored me for three years?
>>>> To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Dear David Amos
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately there has been a considerable delay in responding to
>>>> incoming letters due to heavy workload and many inquiries to our
>>>> office.
>>>>
>>>> We appreciate the issue raised in your letter. We have set up a web
>>>> site www.iceland.org where we have gathered various practical
>>>> information regarding the economic crisis in Iceland.
>>>>
>>>> Greetings from the Ministry of Finance.
>>>>
>>>> Tilvísun í mál: FJR08100024
>>>>
>>>> From: postur@for.stjr.is
>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008
>>>> Subject: Regarding your enquiry to the Prime Ministry of Iceland
>>>> To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>>
>>>> Your enquiry has been received by the Prime Ministry of Iceland and
>>>> waits attendance.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>> From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008
>>>> Subject: I just called to remind the Speaker, the Bankers and the
>>>> Icelanders that I still exist EH Mrs Mrechant, Bob Rae and Iggy?
>>>> To: Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca, sjs@althingi.is, emb.ottawa@mfa.is,
>>>> rmellish@pattersonlaw.ca, irisbirgisdottir@yahoo.ca,
>>>> marie@mariemorneau.com, dfranklin@franklinlegal.com,
>>>> egilla@althingi.is, william.turner@exsultate.ca
>>>> Cc: Rae.B@parl.gc.ca, Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca, lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca,
>>>> merchp@sen.parl.gc.ca, coolsa@sen.parl.gc.ca, olived@sen.parl.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>> All of you should review the documents and CD that came with this
>>>> letter ASAP EH?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
>>>>
>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/4304560/Speaker-Iceland-etc
>>>>
>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/5352095/Tony-Merchant-and-Yankees
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps Geir Haarde and Steingrimur Sigfusson should call me back
>>>>
>>>> Veritas Vincit
>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>>
>>>> The Reykjavík Grapevine
>>>> Hafnarstræti 15
>>>> 101 Reykjavík
>>>> Iceland
>>>> grapevine@grapevine.is
>>>> +354-540-3600
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2017/08/attn-andrey-dvornikov-tel-7-499-244-32.html
>
> Wednesday, 2 August 2017
>
> Attn Andrey Dvornikov, tel. (+7) 499 244 32 54 RE Nikki Haley meeting
> with Vasily Nebeznya.Russia's new ambassador to the United Nations,
> This was the pdf file attached to the email found below
>
> https://www.scribd.com/document/332928056/UN-DUDES
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "MAY, Theresa" theresa.may.mp@parliament.uk
> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 12:12:24 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Andrey Dvornikov, tel. (+7) 499 244 32
> 54 RE Nikki Haley meeting with Vasily Nebeznya.Russia's new ambassador
> to the United Nations,
> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> If your email is to the Prime Minister, please re-send to the No 10
> website:
> www.gov.uk/government/organisations/prime-ministers-office-10-downing-street
>
> http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/prime-ministers-office-10-downing-street
>
>
> If you are a constituent of the Prime Minister, please re-send to:
> sharkeyj@parliament.uk
>
> UK Parliament Disclaimer: This e-mail is confidential to the intended
> recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
> and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or
> copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses,
> but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus
> transmitted by this e-mail. This e-mail address is not secure, is not
> encrypted and should not be used for sensitive data.
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Finance Public / Finance Publique (FIN)"
> fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca
> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 12:12:16 +0000
> Subject: RE: Attn Andrey Dvornikov, tel. (+7) 499 244 32 54 RE Nikki
> Haley meeting with Vasily Nebeznya.Russia's new ambassador to the
> United Nations,
> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
> comments.
>
> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
> commentaires.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:51:14 -0400
> Subject: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump I
> just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
> does he lie to me after all this time???
> To: president , mdcohen212@gmail.com, pm ,
> Pierre-Luc.Dusseault@parl.gc.ca, MulcaT , Jean-Yves.Duclos@parl.gc.ca,
> B.English@ministers.govt.nz, Malcolm.Turnbull.MP@aph.gov.au
,
> pminvites@pmc.gov.au, mayt@parliament.uk, press , "Andrew.Bailey" ,
> fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca, newsroom ,
> "CNN.Viewer.Communications.
Management" , news-tips , lionel
> Cc: David Amos , elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, "justin.ling@vice.com,
> elizabeththompson" , djtjr , "Bill.Morneau" , postur ,
> stephen.kimber@ukings.ca, "steve.murphy" , "Jacques.Poitras" ,
> oldmaison , andre
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Michael Cohen
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:15:14 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA ATTN Pierre-Luc.Dusseault I just
> called and left a message for you
> To: David Amos
>
> Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
> counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
> directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
> directed to 646-853-0114.
> ______________________________
__
> This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
> thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
> This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
> proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
> copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
> recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
> received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
> promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
> to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
> or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
> guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
> any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
> any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its
> affiliates.Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an
> electronic signature under applicable law.
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Finance Public / Finance Publique (FIN)"
>
> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:05:00 +0000
> Subject: RE: Yo President Trump RE the Federal Court of Canada File No
> T-1557-15 lets see how the media people do with news that is NOT FAKE
> To: David Amos
>
> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
> comments.
>
> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
> commentaires.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Kevin Leahy
> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 12:38:43 -0400
> Subject: Re: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge (857 259
> 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
> To: David Amos
>
> French will follow
>
> Thank you for your email.
>
> For inquiries regarding EMRO’s Office, please address your email to
> acting EMRO Sebastien Brillon at sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> For inquiries regarding CO NHQ Office, please address your email to
> acting CO Farquharson, David at David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> All PPS related correspondence should be sent to my PPS account at
> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
> ------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
> Merci pour votre courriel.
>
> Pour toute question concernant le Bureau de l'EMRO, veuillez adresser
> vos courriels à l’Officier responsable des Relations
> employeur-employés par intérim Sébastien Brillon  à l'adresse suivante
sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> Pour toute  question concernant le bureau du Commandant de la
> Direction générale, veuillez adresser vos courriels au   Commandant de
> la Direction générale par intérim Farquharson, David  à l'adresse
> suivante   David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> Toute correspondance relative au Service De Protection Parlementaire
> doit être envoyée à mon compte de PPS à l'adresse suivante
> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
>
>
> Kevin Leahy
> Chief Superintendent/Surintendant principal
> Director, Parliamentary Protective Service
> Directeur , Service de protection parlementaire
> T 613-996-5048
> Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are
> confidential and may contain protected information. It is intended
> only for the individual or entity named in the message. If you are not
> the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver the
> message that this email contains to the intended recipient, you should
> not disseminate, distribute or copy this email, nor disclose or use in
> any manner the information that it contains. Please notify the sender
> immediately if you have received this email by mistake and delete it.
> AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ: Le présent courriel et tout fichier qui y est
> joint sont confidentiels et peuvent contenir des renseignements
> protégés. Il est strictement réservé à l’usage du destinataire prévu.
> Si vous n’êtes pas le destinataire prévu, ou le mandataire chargé de
> lui transmettre le message que ce courriel contient, vous ne devez ni
> le diffuser, le distribuer ou le copier, ni divulguer ou utiliser à
> quelque fin que ce soit les renseignements qu’il contient. Veuillez
> aviser immédiatement l’expéditeur si vous avez reçu ce courriel par
> erreur et supprimez-le.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 16:38:41 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge
> (857 259 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
> To: David Amos
>
> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
> valued.
>
> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>
> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
> response may take several business days.
>
> Thanks again for your email.
> ______­­
>
> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>
> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>
> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>
> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos
>> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:15:59 -0400
>> Subject: Hey Ralph Goodale perhaps you and the RCMP should call the
>> Yankees Governor Charlie Baker, his lawyer Bob Ross, Rachael Rollins
>> and this cop Robert Ridge (857 259 9083) ASAP EH Mr Primme Minister
>> Trudeau the Younger and Donald Trump Jr?
>> To: pm@pm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
>> Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, djtjr@trumporg.com,
>> Donald.J.Trump@donaldtrump.com
, JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca,
>> Frank.McKenna@td.com, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> Douglas.Johnson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
, sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> gov.press@state.ma.us, bob.ross@state.ma.us, jfurey@nbpower.com,
>> jfetzer@d.umn.edu, Newsroom@globeandmail.com, sfine@globeandmail.com,
>> .Poitras@cbc.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
>> Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, news@kingscorecord.com,
>> news@dailygleaner.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, jbosnitch@gmail.com,
>> andre@jafaust.com>
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, DJT@trumporg.com
>> wharrison@nbpower.com, David.Lametti@parl.gc.camcu@justice.gc.ca,
>> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca
>>
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Finance Public / Finance Publique (FIN)"
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:52:33 +0000
Subject: RE: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump
I just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
does he lie to me after all this time???
To: David Amos

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.


---------- Original message ----------
From: Póstur FOR
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:51:41 +0000
Subject: Re: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump
I just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
does he lie to me after all this time???
To: David Amos

Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið  / Your request has been received

Kveðja / Best regards
Forsætisráðuneytið  / Prime Minister's Office

---------- Original message ----------
From: "B English (MIN)"
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:51:29 +0000
Subject: Automated response from the office of Hon Bill English
To: David Amos

Thank you for your email to the Prime Minister.

This is an automated response.

Please be assured that any matters you raise in your email will be
noted; however, not all messages will receive an individual response.

Yours sincerely
The Office of the Prime Minister


---------- Original message ----------
From: PmInvites
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:52:50 +0000
Subject: PM Invites
To: David Amos

Thank you for your invitation/meeting request to the Prime Minister,
the Hon Malcolm Turnbull MP.
Your invitation will be considered in light of the Prime Minister's
existing commitments.
We will be in touch with you as soon as possible to formally advise
the progress of your invitation/meeting request.

Yours sincerely

Prime Minister's Office

______________________________
________________________________________

IMPORTANT: This message, and any attachments to it, contains information
that is confidential and may also be the subject of legal professional or
other privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you
must not review, copy, disseminate or disclose its contents to any other
party or take action in reliance of any material contained within it. If you
have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by
return email informing them of the mistake and delete all copies of the
message from your computer system.


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Turnbull, Malcolm (MP)"
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:51:35 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President
Donald J. Trump I just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen
(646-853-0114) Why does he lie to me after all this time???
To: David Amos

***Please be advised that this email address is no longer in use***

Thank you for taking the time to write to me. Feedback from the people
we represent is always extremely valuable for members of parliament,
and especially valuable to me as Prime Minister.

However as you can imagine I receive a very large, sometimes
dauntingly large, amount of correspondence and it is important that we
do everything we can to respond to it as quickly and effectively as
possible.

So to help us best direct your enquiry and respond to it, please
complete this contact form. If you have written a detailed message in
your email, just cut and paste it into the contact form and complete
the details requested.

If you would like to invite me or Lucy to an event, please forward the
invitation to pminvites@pmc.gov.au.

If you are a Wentworth constituent, please make us aware of this and
my electorate office team in Edgecliff will be in touch.

Regards,

Malcolm Turnbull
Prime Minister


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:51:14 -0400
Subject: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump I
just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
does he lie to me after all this time???
To: president , mdcohen212@gmail.com, pm ,
Pierre-Luc.Dusseault@parl.gc.ca, MulcaT , Jean-Yves.Duclos@parl.gc.ca,
B.English@ministers.govt.nz, Malcolm.Turnbull.MP@aph.gov.au,
pminvites@pmc.gov.au, mayt@parliament.uk, press , "Andrew.Bailey" ,
fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca, newsroom ,
"CNN.Viewer.Communications.
Management" , news-tips , lionel
Cc: David Amos , elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, "justin.ling@vice.com,
elizabeththompson" , djtjr , "Bill.Morneau" , postur ,
stephen.kimber@ukings.ca, "steve.murphy" , "Jacques.Poitras" ,
oldmaison , andre


> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:15:59 -0400
> Subject: Hey Ralph Goodale perhaps you and the RCMP should call the
> Yankees Governor Charlie Baker, his lawyer Bob Ross, Rachael Rollins
> and this cop Robert Ridge (857 259 9083) ASAP EH Mr Primme Minister
> Trudeau the Younger and Donald Trump Jr?
> To: pm@pm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
> Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, djtjr@trumporg.com,
> Donald.J.Trump@donaldtrump.com
, JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca,
> Frank.McKenna@td.com, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Douglas.Johnson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
, sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> gov.press@state.ma.us, bob.ross@state.ma.us, jfurey@nbpower.com,
> jfetzer@d.umn.edu, Newsroom@globeandmail.com, sfine@globeandmail.com,
> .Poitras@cbc.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
> Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, news@kingscorecord.com,
> news@dailygleaner.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, jbosnitch@gmail.com,
> andre@jafaust.com>
> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, DJT@trumporg.com
> wharrison@nbpower.com, David.Lametti@parl.gc.camcu@justice.gc.ca,
> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca
>
>>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos,
>>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>>> of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
>>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>>
>>> Department of Justice
>>>
>>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>>
>>>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
>>>> ilian.html
>>>>
>>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>>>>
>>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>>>>
>>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>>>> cards?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
>>>>> 6
>>>>>
>>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>>>>
>>>>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>>>>
>>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>>> United States Senate
>>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>>> tapes.
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>>>
>>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Good Day Sir
>>>>
>>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>>
>>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>>
>>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>>
>>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>>
>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>>>>
>>>> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>>>>
>>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>>>>
>>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>>>>
>>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>>
>>>> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>>
>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>>
>>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>>
>>>> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>>
>>>> Date: 20151223
>>>>
>>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>>
>>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>>
>>>> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>>
>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>>
>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>>
>>>> Plaintiff
>>>>
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>>
>>>> Defendant
>>>>
>>>> ORDER
>>>>
>>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>>
>>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>>> in its entirety.
>>>>
>>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
>>>> he stated:
>>>>
>>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>>
>>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>>> Police.
>>>>
>>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
>>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>>
>>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>>> Judge
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>>
>>>>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
>>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
>>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>>
>>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>>> most
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>>>> dudes are way past too late
>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>
>>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>>
>>>> Merci ,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>>
>>>> January 13, 2015
>>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>>
>>>> December 8, 2014
>>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>>
>>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>>
>>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>>
>>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>>
>>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>>
>>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>>
>>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>>
>>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>>>
>>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>>
>>>> Subject:
>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>>
>>>> January 30, 2007
>>>>
>>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>>
>>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>>
>>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>>
>>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>>> Minister of Health
>>>>
>>>> CM/cb
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
>>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>>
>>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>>
>>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>>
>>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>>
>>>>  Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>
>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>>> The Supreme Court
>>>
>>> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do
>>>
>>>
>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>>
>>> Amos v. Canada
>>> Court (s) Database
>>>
>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>> Date
>>>
>>> 2017-10-30
>>> Neutral citation
>>>
>>> 2017 FCA 213
>>> File numbers
>>>
>>> A-48-16
>>> Date: 20171030
>>>
>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>> CORAM:
>>>
>>> WEBB J.A.
>>> NEAR J.A.
>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>> and
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>>
>>> THE COURT
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Date: 20171030
>>>
>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>> CORAM:
>>>
>>> WEBB J.A.
>>> NEAR J.A.
>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>> and
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>>
>>> I.                    Introduction
>>>
>>> [1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
>>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
>>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
>>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>>
>>> [2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
>>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>>
>>>
>>> [3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>>> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
>>> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
>>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>>
>>>
>>> [4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
>>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>>> cross-appeal.
>>>
>>>
>>> II.                 Preliminary Matter
>>>
>>> [5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
>>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
>>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>>
>>> [6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
>>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>>> c. F-7:
>>>
>>>
>>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>>> Appeal.
>>> […]
>>>
>>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>>> […]
>>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>>
>>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
>>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>>
>>>
>>> [7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
>>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>>> section.
>>> [8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>>> that:
>>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
>>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>
>>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
>>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
>>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>>> matière civile et pénale.
>>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>
>>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>>
>>>
>>> [9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
>>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
>>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
>>> appeal book.
>>>
>>>
>>> [10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>>
>>>
>>> [11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>>
>>>
>>> [12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>>> such judge had a conflict.
>>>
>>>
>>> [13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
>>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>>> was a member of such firm.
>>>
>>>
>>> [14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
>>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
>>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
>>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>>
>>>
>>> [15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
>>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
>>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
>>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>>> [16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
>>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>>> apprehension of bias:
>>> 60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
>>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>>
>>> [17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>>> (4th) 193).
>>>
>>> [18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
>>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
>>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>>> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
>>> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>>> 27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>>
>>>
>>> 28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
>>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>>
>>>
>>> 29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>>
>>>
>>> 30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
>>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
>>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
>>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>>>             To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
>>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>>> 31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>>
>>>
>>> 32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>>> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
>>> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
>>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
>>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
>>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
>>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>>> events from over a decade ago.
>>> (emphasis added)
>>>
>>> [19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
>>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
>>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>>
>>> [20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
>>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
>>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>>
>>> [21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
>>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>>
>>> [22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
>>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
>>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>>
>>> [23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
>>> to recuse himself.
>>>
>>> [24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
>>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>>
>>> [25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
>>> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>>
>>>
>>> III.               Issue
>>>
>>> [26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
>>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>>
>>> IV.              Analysis
>>>
>>> A.                 Standard of Review
>>>
>>> [27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
>>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
>>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>>
>>> [28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
>>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>>> interfere.
>>>
>>>
>>> B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>>
>>> [29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>>
>>> 17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
>>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
>>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>>> (…)
>>>
>>>
>>> 21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
>>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>>> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
>>> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
>>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>>> [footnotes omitted].
>>>
>>>
>>> [30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
>>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
>>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>>> para. 27).
>>>
>>>
>>> [31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
>>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>>
>>>
>>> [13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
>>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>>
>>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>>
>>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>>>
>>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
>>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>>
>>> [32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
>>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>>
>>> [33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
>>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>>
>>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
>>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>>> of process…
>>>
>>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>>
>>> [34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>>
>>> [35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
>>> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
>>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
>>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>>> supporting a cause of action.
>>>
>>> [36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>>
>>> V.                 Conclusion
>>> [37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>>> without leave to amend.
>>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>>> J.A.
>>> "David G. Near"
>>> J.A.
>>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>>> J.A.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>>
>>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
>>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>>> DOCKET:
>>>
>>> A-48-16
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>>
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>>
>>> Fredericton,
>>> New Brunswick
>>>
>>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>>
>>> May 24, 2017
>>>
>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>>
>>> WEBB J.A.
>>> NEAR J.A.
>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>
>>> DATED:
>>>
>>> October 30, 2017
>>>
>>> APPEARANCES:
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>
>>>
>>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>>> (on his own behalf)
>>>
>>> Jan Jensen
>>>
>>>
>>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>
>>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>>
>>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>
>>>
>

SIDNEY POWELL
Sidney Powell, P.C.
2911 Turtle Creek Blvd., Suite 300
Dallas, Texas 75219
(517) 763-7499
sidney@federalappeals.com



HOWARD KLEINHENDLER
Counsel of Record
Howard Kleinhendler Esquire
369 Lexington Avenue, 12th Floor
New York, New York 10017
(917) 793-1188
howard@kleinhendler.com


L. LIN WOOD
L. LIN WOOD, P.C.
P.O. Box 52584
Atlanta, GA 30305-0584
(404) 891-1402
lwood@fightback.law

Of Counsel
JULIA Z. HALLER
BRANDON JOHNSON
EMILY P. NEWMAN


SIDNEY POWELL
STEFANIE LAMBERT JUNTTILA
Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Petitioners
500 Griswold Street, Suite 2340
Detroit, MI 48226
(248) 270-6689
attorneystefanielambert@gmail.com

SCOTT R. ELDRIDGE
Attorney at Law
Miller, Canfield,
One Michigan Avenue
Suite 900
Lansing, MI 48933-1609
517-483-4918
Email: eldridge@millercanfield.com

DANIEL M. SHARE
EUGENE DRIKER
STEPHEN E. GLAZEK
Attorney at Law
Barris, Sott, Denn & Driker, PLLC
333 West Fort Street; 12th Floor
Detroit, MI 48226
313-965-9725
Email: dshare@bsdd.com

EZRA D. ROSENBERG
Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law
1500 K Street, NW; Suite 900
Washington, DC 20005
202-662-8345
Email: erosenberg@lawyerscommittee.org

JON GREENBAUM
Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law
District Of Columbia
1500 K Street NW
Ste 9th Floor
Washington, DC 20005
202-662-8315
Email: jgreenbaum@lawyerscommittee.org

ERIK A. GRILL
HEATHER S. MEINGAST
Michigan Department of Attorney General
Civil Litigation, Employment & Elections Division
PO Box 30736
Lansing, MI 48909
517-335-7659
Email: grille@michigan.gov

DARRYL BRESSACK
DAVID H. FINK and NATHAN J. FINK
Attorneys as Law
38500 Woodward Avenue; Suite 350
Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304
248-971-2500
Email: dbressack@finkbressack.com

ANDREW A. PATERSON, JR.
Attorney at Law
46350 Grand River Ave.
Novi, MI 48374
248 568-9712
Email: aap43@hotmail.com

MARY ELLEN GUREWITZ
Attorney at Law
Cummings & Cummings Law PLLC
423 North Main Street; Suite 200
Royal Oak, MI 48067
313-204-6979
Email: megurewitz@gmail.com

THOMAS MORE SOCIETY
309 W. Washington Street
Suite 1250
Chicago, IL 60606
ph: 312.782.1680
f: 312.782.1887



“Personal prejudice and financial greed are the two great evils that
threaten courts of law, and once they get the upper hand they
immediately hamstring society, by destroying all justice.”
― Thomas More, Utopia.”

Michael McHale, Counsel

Michael McHale received a B.A. in Journalism and History from the
University of Nebraska-Lincoln with high distinction in 2009, and a
J.D. from the University of Nebraska College of Law with distinction
in 2012. Prior to joining TMS, Michael served as general counsel and
policy analyst for the Nebraska Catholic Conference, where he
testified before several committees of the Nebraska Legislature
defending the constitutionality of school vouchers, tax-credit
scholarships, and Nebraska’s parental consent statute for
abortion-seeking minors. From 2018 to 2019, he clerked for the
Honorable L. Steven Grasz on the United States Court of Appeals for
the Eighth Circuit.

Michael is a Blackstone Legal Fellow with Alliance Defending Freedom.
His writings on the
rights to life and religious freedom have appeared in the Witherspoon
Institute’s online journal, Public Discourse, along with the Omaha
World-Herald and the Lincoln Journal Star. He has also completed
pre-theology studies as a seminarian at St. Gregory the Great
Seminary, where he studied philosophy and natural law.

Biography of Michael McHale, Counsel

Biography of Christopher Ferrara, Special Counsel


Christopher Ferrara is a Roman Catholic attorney, pro-life activist,
and journalist. He founded the American Catholic Lawyers Association
in 1990. He joined the Thomas More Society in 2020, and concentrates
his legal work on pro-life defense, religious liberty cases, unjust
laws that attack Catholic institutions, and that infringe on parental
rights. Mr. Ferrara graduated from Fordham Law in 1977 and practices
out of a satellite office in the New York metropolitan area. Mr.
Ferrara is a widely published author on Catholic Church affairs. Mr.
Ferrara is married and has six children.


CHRISTOPHER A. FERRARA, ESQ.
(Bar No. 51198)
148-29 Cross Island Parkway
Whitestone, Queens, New York 11357
Telephone: (718) 357-1040  973 703 0907
cferrara@thomasmoresociety.org
Special Counsel to the Thomas More Society


https://minnlawyer.com/2020/11/25/republicans-sue-to-stop-wisconsin-vote-certification/

Bill Gaier      President and Publisher         612-584-1537

Republicans sue to stop Wisconsin vote certification

By: The Associated Press        November 25, 2020       

MADISON, Wis. — Republicans filed a lawsuit Tuesday asking the
Wisconsin Supreme Court to block certification of the presidential
election results even as a recount over President-elect Joe Biden’s
win over President Donald Trump is ongoing.

The lawsuit echoes many of the same arguments Trump is making in
trying, unsuccessfully, to have tens of thousands of ballots
discounted during the recount. It also seeks to give the power to name
presidential electors to the Republican-controlled Legislature.

Wisconsin state law allows the political parties to pick electors,
which was done in October. Once the election results are certified,
which is scheduled to be done Dec. 1, those pre-determined electors
will cast their ballots for the winner on Dec. 14.

“The litigation filed this afternoon seeks to disenfranchise every
Wisconsinite who voted in this year’s presidential election,” said
Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul. “The Wisconsin Department of
Justice will ensure that Wisconsin’s presidential electors are
selected based on the will of the more than 3 million Wisconsin voters
who cast a ballot.”

The lawsuit also rehashes a claim that a federal court rejected in
September that Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg tried to “illegally
circumvent Wisconsin absentee voting laws” through grants awarded by a
nonprofit center he funds.

At least 10 cases have been filed across the country seeking to halt
certification in parts or all of key battleground states, including
lawsuits brought by the Trump campaign in Michigan and Pennsylvania.
So far none have been successful.

The Wisconsin lawsuit was filed by attorney Erick Kaardal, a former
Minnesota Republican Party official who also represented rapper Kanye
West in his unsuccessful lawsuit attempting to get on the ballot in
Wisconsin. Kaardal represents a conservative group called the
Wisconsin Voters Alliance and a host of Republican voters.

Kaardal also filed an unsuccessful federal lawsuit in Wisconsin that
attempted to block $6.3 million from being awarded to five heavily
Democratic cities from the nonprofit Center for Technology and Civic
Life, which is primarily funded by Zuckerberg and his wife. A judge
tossed the lawsuit that argued the money amounted to bribery to
bolster Democratic turnout in Green Bay, Kenosha, Madison, Milwaukee
and Racine.

Many of the same arguments alleging the money was illegally awarded
and therefore the election results should be nullified are being made
in the new lawsuit in state court.

Other claims mirror those by Trump’s campaign.  Those claims allege
absentee ballots should not have been counted where election officials
filled in missing information on the certification envelope that
contains the ballot and that voters who identified as “indefinitely
confined” were lying to avoid the state’s photo ID law.

The Wisconsin Elections Commission advises clerks that they can fill
in missing information on the ballot envelopes, such as the address of
a witness. That’s been the practice for years, and it’s never been
challenged.

Biden won Wisconsin by 20,608 votes, but the lawsuit claims that more
than 156,000 ballots should be tossed out.

info@thomasmoresociety.org

Federal Court Says New York Governor Cuomo is Wrong to Limit Worship Services
Governor Cuomo and Mayor DeBlasio

(Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo is wrong to limit worship services yet
condone mass protests, according to a federal judge. After telling
Thomas More Society attorneys in a June 18, 2020 hearing that he was
“troubled by” the government’s responses, Senior U.S. District Judge
Gary L. Sharpe issued a preliminary injunction on June 26, 2020,
prohibiting Governor Cuomo, his Attorney General Letitia James, and
New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio from ordering or enforcing COVID-19
prompted restrictions on outdoor religious worship gatherings.
Christopher Ferrara

“This decision is an important step toward inhibiting the suddenly
emerging trend of exercising absolute monarchy on pretext of public
health. What this kind of regime really meant in practice is freedom
for me, but not for thee,” said Thomas More Society Special Counsel
Christopher Ferrara.

Thomas More Society Special Counsel Christopher Ferrara remarked, “We
are pleased that Judge Sharpe was able to see through the sham of
Governor Cuomo’s ‘Social Distancing Protocol’ which went right out the
window as soon as he and Mayor de Blasio saw a mass protest movement
they favored taking to the streets by the thousands. Suddenly, the
limit on ‘mass gatherings’ was no longer necessary to ‘save lives.’
Yet they were continuing to ban high school graduations and other
outdoor gatherings exceeding a mere 25 people. This decision is an
important step toward inhibiting the suddenly emerging trend of
exercising absolute monarchy on pretext of public health. What this
kind of regime really meant in practice is freedom for me, but not for
thee.”

Sharpe’s order noted that, “it is not the judiciary’s role to second
guess the likes of Governor Cuomo or Mayor de Blasio when it comes to
decisions they make in such troubling times, that is, until those
decisions result in the curtailment of fundamental rights without
compelling justification.”

In awarding the injunction, the court noted that “nonessential
businesses” that enjoy a 50% capacity limitation are not justifiably
different than houses of worship.

Sharpe remarked that offices, retails stores, salons, and restaurants
– all now permitted to open at 50% capacity indoors – all involve the
congregation of people for a length of time. He stated, “These secular
businesses/activities threaten defendants’ interest in slowing the
spread of COVID-19 to a similar or greater degree than those of
plaintiffs’, and demonstrate that the 25% indoor capacity limitation
on houses of worship is underinclusive and triggers strict scrutiny
review.”

The judge pointed out, “Another case of individualized exemption seems
even more obvious.” Governor Cuomo has now specifically authorized
outdoor, in-person graduation ceremonies of no more than 150 people.
This is an express exemption from the ten- or twenty-five-person
outdoor limits that apply to other situations. Yet, “There is nothing
materially different about a graduation ceremony and a religious
gathering such that defendants’ justifications for a difference in
treatment can be found compelling.”

Sharpe took New York City to task, stating that de Blasio’s
simultaneous pro-protest/anti-religious gathering messages “clearly
undermine the legitimacy” of his argument that selective enforcement
of the challenged laws with respect to mass race protests is a matter
of public safety.

“Governor Cuomo and Mayor de Blasio could have just as easily
discouraged protests, short of condemning their message, in the name
of public health and exercised discretion to suspend enforcement for
public safety reasons instead of encouraging what they knew was a
flagrant disregard of the outdoor limits and social distancing rules,”
wrote Sharpe. “They could have also been silent. But by acting as they
did, Governor Cuomo and Mayor de Blasio sent a clear message that mass
protests are deserving of preferential treatment.”

As a result of the federal order, Governor Cuomo, Attorney General
James, and Mayor de Blasio are “enjoined and restrained from enforcing
any indoor gathering limitations” against the involved houses of
worship “greater than imposed for Phase 2 industries,” provided that
participants follow the prescribed social distancing. They are also
forbidden from “enforcing any limitation for outdoor gatherings
provided that participants in such gatherings follow social distancing
requirements as set forth in the applicable executive orders and
guidance.”

Cuomo, James, and de Blasio were sued by two Catholic priests from
upstate New York and a trio of Orthodox Jewish congregants from
Brooklyn for violations of their civil rights by prejudicial orders
and selective enforcement. The federal lawsuit, filed June 10, 2020,
in United States District Court for the Northern District of New York,
charged the governor, attorney general, and mayor with violating the
plaintiffs’ rights to free exercise of religion, freedom of speech,
assembly and expressive association, and due process, under the First
and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. Governor Cuomo was
also accused of violating New York state law and the New York State
Constitution.

Ferrara explained the lawsuit: “In an unprecedented abuse of power,
Governor Cuomo and Mayor de Blasio have exploited the COVID-19
pandemic to create, over the past three months, a veritable
dictatorship by means of a complex web of executive orders. The orders
have imposed and selectively enforced ‘social distancing’ under a
‘lockdown’ of virtually every aspect of life for New York state
residents on the pretext of ‘public health,’ but with numerous
exceptions. The permissible activities, not based on the science of
viral contagion, but rather determined according to personal value
judgments, have included mass demonstrations of thousands of people –
gatherings of which the governor and mayor have approved and the mayor
participated in. Cuomo and de Blasio, along with James, have enforced
the gubernatorial ‘lockdown’ by threat of criminal prosecution and
actual prosecution, including $1,000 fines for the recently created
offense of violating Cuomo’s ‘Social Distancing Protocol’.”

Ferrara added, “These mass protest gatherings, taking place during the
COVID-19 stay-at-home lockdown orders, have been not only allowed but
praised by both the governor of New York and mayor of New York City,
even though massive property damage and death have resulted. This,
when the government’s primary purpose is to protect the people it
governs.”

Read United States District Court for the Northern District of New
York Judge Gary L. Sharpe’s Memorandum-Decision and Order, issued June
26, 2020, in response to the Thomas More Society’s complaint, filed on
behalf of Rev. Steven Soos, Rev. Nicholas Stamos, Daniel Schonbrun,
Elchanan Perr, and Mayer Mayerfeld, in Rev. Steven Soos, et al v.
Andrew M. Cuomo, et al, here.


https://minnlawyer.com/2020/08/14/minnesota-churches-join-legal-challenges-to-virus-rules/

Minnesota churches join legal challenges to virus rules

By: The Associated Press        August 14, 2020

Churches in Minnesota and California, backed by a conservative legal
group, filed lawsuits this week against the governors of their states
challenging restrictions imposed due to the coronavirus outbreak that
they contend are violations of religious liberty.

They’re the latest in a long series of legal challenges, many of them
in California, pitting clerics and houses of worship who believe they
should be exempt from certain restrictions on public gatherings
against governors who insist the measures are needed to rein in the
pandemic. Most of the suits have been rebuffed; some have succeeded.

In Minnesota, a lawsuit was filed Thursday in federal court
challenging Gov. Tim Walz’s executive orders requiring 6-foot social
distancing and the wearing of face masks at worship services.

“Gov. Walz, a former teacher, gets an F in religious liberties,” said
Erick Kaardal, special counsel for the Thomas More Society. “Other
states, including Texas, Illinois and Ohio, have excluded churches
from COVID-19 mask mandates.”

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison reiterated his defense of
Walz’s order, saying it was legally and constitutionally sound.

Teddy Tschann, spokesperson for Walz, said the governor was within his
authority taking the action and added that all Walz’s actions have
been grounded in the desire to keep Minnesotans safe.

Walz had been embroiled in a battle with Roman Catholic and Lutheran
Church-Missouri Synod congregations across Minnesota over restrictions
he placed on gatherings of more than 10 people. He relented and said
they could hold services at 25% of capacity if certain conditions were
met after they made it clear they planned to defy the order.

Earlier this month a pastor in Palmetto, Florida, filed a suit
challenging Manatee County’s mask mandate. The Rev. Joel Tillis of
Suncoast Baptist Church said the order shouldn’t extend to houses of
worship because it hinders prayer.

The Thomas More Society, which specializes in litigation on religious
issues, filed a lawsuit Wednesday in California Superior Court against
Gov. Gavin Newsom and other officials. It seeks to prevent the
enforcement of “unconstitutional and onerous coronavirus pandemic
regulations” against Grace Community Church in the Los Angeles
neighborhood of Sun Valley.

The pastor, John MacArthur, has been holding services in recent weeks
attended by throngs of worshippers in defiance of state and county
limits on gatherings.

“We will obey God rather than men,” MacArthur said in a message to his
congregation. “He will be on our side.”

MacArthur was greeted with applause Sunday when he welcomed
worshippers to his church’s “peaceful protest.”

One of the two Thomas More lawyers representing MacArthur and his
church is Jenna Ellis, who also is a senior legal adviser to President
Donald Trump’s reelection campaign.

“California’s edicts demanding an indefinite shutdown have gone now
far past rational or reasonable and are firmly in the territory of
tyranny and discrimination,” Ellis said. “This isn’t about health.
It’s about blatantly targeting churches.”

The lawsuit contends that restrictions on large gatherings should not
be enforced at churches because they were not enforced on large
demonstrations against racism and police brutality.

Officials in California, where COVID-19 cases have been surging in
recent weeks, say strict restrictions remain necessary in Los Angeles
County and other counties that are on a state monitoring list for high
rates of new infections.

Los Angeles County filed a lawsuit against the church Thursday seeking
to have in-door, in-person worship services stopped. The lawsuit also
seeks to have the church comply with health order requirements,
including the use of face covers and physical distancing at outdoor
services.

Attorney General Xavier Becerra’s office referred a request for
comment to Newsom’s office, as the new lawsuit addresses the
governor’s executive order. Spokesmen for Newsom did not immediately
respond to a request for comment.

Across the country the vast majority of churches have cooperated with
health authorities and successfully protected their congregations. Yet
from the earliest phases of the pandemic, and continuing to this day,
some worship services and other religious activities have been
identified as sources of local outbreaks.

A few churches have been openly defiant, including one in California’s
Ventura County which held indoor worship services Sunday despite a
judge’s temporary restraining order.

Pastor Rob McCoy of Godspeak Calvary Chapel in Newbury Park had vowed
to continue in-person services even though the order cited “an
immediate threat to public health and safety.”

On Tuesday a different judge declined a county request to order the
immediate closure of the church, and scheduled a hearing for Aug. 21.

Earlier this year the U.S. Supreme Court upheld state COVID-19
restrictions on religious gatherings in a suit filed by South Bay
United Pentecostal Church in Chula Vista, California.

Religious plaintiffs have prevailed in some litigation, however. In
June a federal judge blocked New York state from enforcing
restrictions on indoor religious gatherings to 25% capacity when other
types of gatherings were limited to 50%.

The plaintiffs, represented by the Thomas More Society, were two
Catholic priests from Upstate New York and three Orthodox Jewish
congregants from Brooklyn. They argued that the restrictions violated
their First Amendment rights to practice their religion.

The society also claimed a victory in May when Illinois Gov. J.B.
Pritzker withdrew certain pandemic-related mandates on houses of
worship.

In the new Minnesota case, the plaintiffs were Protestant churches in
the towns of Alexandria, Buffalo and Crosby, along with their pastors.

“Our people are commanded to meet together in fellowship,” Eric
Anderson, pastor of Life Spring Church in Crosby, said at a news
conference Thursday. “They can’t fellowship with masks on their
faces.”

Kaardal, the Thomas Moore lawyer, argued that Walz’s executive order
usurped the legislature’s lawmaking powers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXMQciBKW4g&ab_channel=AnnVandersteel

12-21-20 Guardians of Free Speech; Flynn Family Stands with 1st
Amendment Praetorians
8,941 views
Streamed live on Dec 21, 2020
Ann Vandersteel

1st Amendment Praetorian

Special Guest: Robert Patrick Lewis
https://twitter.com/1st_praetorian?la...
1AP.admin@protonmail.com
https://www.1apraetorian.com/
https://www.1apraetorian.com/donate

Resounding Endorsements!
1. General Flynn Endorsement:  https://twitter.com/GenFlynn/status/1...
2. Joe Flynn Endorsement: https://twitter.com/JosephJFlynn1/sta...
3. Joe Flynn Endorsement : https://twitter.com/JosephJFlynn1/sta...


1AP.admin@protonmail.com

Anni L. Foster (#023643)
General Counsel
Office of Arizona Governor Douglas A. Ducey
1700 West Washington Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85007
Telephone: 602-542-4331
E-Mail: afoster@az.gov

Brett W. Johnson (#021527)
Colin P. Ahler (#023879)
Derek C. Flint (#034392)
Ian R. Joyce (#035806)
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
One Arizona Center
400 E. Van Buren, Suite 1900
Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2202
Telephone: 602.382.6000
Facsimile: 602.382.6070
E-Mail: bwjohnson@swlaw.com
cahler@swlaw.com
dflint@swlaw.com
ijoyce@swlaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant Douglas

Brian Kemp
Office of the Governor
206 Washington Street
Suite 203, State Capitol
Atlanta, GA 30334
Tel: (404) 656-1776
Email: governorsoffice@michigan.gov

Christopher M. Carr
Office of the Attorney General
40 Capitol Square, SW
Atlanta, GA 30334
Tel: (404) 458-3600
Email: ccarr@law.ga.gov

Gretchen Whitmer
Office of the Governor
P.O. Box 30013
Lansing, MI 48909
Tel: 517-373-3400
Email: governorsoffice@michigan.gov

Dana Nessel
G. Mennen Williams Building
525 W. Ottawa Street
P.O. Box 30212
Lansing, MI 48909
Tel: 517-373-1110
Email: dnessel@michigan.gov

Ken Paxton
Attorney General of Texas
Brent Webster
First Assistant Attorney
General of Texas
Lawrence Joseph
Special Counsel to the
Attorney General of Texas
Office of the Attorney General
P.O. Box 12548 (MC 059)
Austin, TX 78711-2548
kenneth.paxton@oag.texas.gov
(512) 936-1414

Anthony S. Evers
Office of the Governor
115 East, State Capitol
Madison WI 53702
Tel: (414) 227-4344
Email: EversInfo@wisconsin.gov

Joshua L. Kaul
Wisconsin Department of Justice
17 West Main Street, P.O. Box 7857
Madison, WI 53707-7857
Tel: (608) 287-4202
Email: kauljl@doj.state.wi.us

Tom Wolf
Office of the Governor
508 Main Capitol Building
Harrisburg, PA 17120
Tel: 717-787-2500
Email: govcorrespcrm@pa.gov

Josh Shapiro
Office of Attorney General
Strawberry Square
Harrisburg, PA 17120
Tel.: 717.787.3391
Email: jshapiro@attorneygeneral.gov

Alexander Michael del Rey Kolodin,
AZ Bar No. 030826
Alexander.Kolodin@KolodinLaw.
com
Christopher Viskovic,
AZ Bar No. 0358601
CViskovic@KolodinLaw.com
KOLODIN LAW GROUP PLLC
3443 N. Central Ave. Ste. 1009
Phoenix, AZ 85012
Telephone: (602) 730-2985
Facsimile: (602) 801-2539

Andrew Wilder
Director of Communications
Republican Majority Caucus
(602) 926-5299
awilder@azleg.gov

Representative Mark Finchem, LD-11
P.O. Box 69344
Oro Valley, AZ 85737
(520) 808-7340
MarkFinchem@me.com

Nancy K. Barto
5450 East. Deer Valley Dr.
#2196
Phoenix, Arizona 85054
602-926-5766 (office)
480-513-3750 (home)
602-370-8262 (direct)
NBarto@azleg.gov


Alexis E. Danneman (Bar No. 030478)
Sarah R. Gonski (Bar No. 032567)
PERKINS COIE LLP
2901 North Central Avenue, Suite 2000
Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2788
Telephone: (602) 351-8000
Facsimile: (602) 648-7000
ADanneman@perkinscoie.com
SGonski@perkinscoie.com

Marc E. Elias*
Bruce V. Spiva*
John Devaney*
John M. Geise**
PERKINS COIE LLP
700 Thirteenth Street NW, Suite 600
Washington, D.C. 20005-3960
Telephone: (202) 654-6200
Facsimile: (202) 654-6211
MElias@perkinscoie.com
BSpiva@perkinscoie.com
JDevaney@perkinscoie.com
JGeise@perkinscoie.com

Laura Hill*
PERKINS COIE LLP
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900
Seattle, WA 98101-3099
Telephone: (206) 359-3349
Facsimile: (206) 359-4349
LHill@perkinscoie.com

Roy Herrera (Bar No. 032901)
Daniel A. Arellano (Bar No. 032304)
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
1 East Washington Street, Suite 2300
Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2555
Telephone: 602.798.5400
Facsimile: 602.798.5595
HerreraR@ballardspahr.com
ArellanoD@ballardspahr.com


Senator Kelly Townsend:
a. Senator in the AZ legislature
b. Maricopa County
c. kellyjtownsend@yahoo.com

ALLISTER ADEL
MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY
Thomas P. Liddy (019384)
Emily Craiger (021728)
Joseph I. Vigil (018677)
Joseph J. Branco (031474)
Joseph E. LaRue (031348)
Deputy County Attorneys
liddyt@mcao.maricopa.gov
craigere@mcao.maricopa.gov
vigilj@mcao.maricopa.gov
brancoj@mcao.maricopa.gov
laruej@mcao.maricopa.gov

CIVIL SERVICES DIVISION
225 West Madison Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
Telephone (602) 506-8541
Facsimile (602) 506-4317
ca-civilmailbox@mcao.maricopa.gov
Attorneys for Maricopa County Defendants

Roopali H. Desai (024295)
D. Andrew Gaona (028414)
Kristen Yost (034052)
COPPERSMITH BROCKELMAN PLC
2800 North Central Avenue, Suite 1900
Phoenix, AZ 85004
T: (602) 381-5478
rdesai@cblawyers.com
agaona@cblawyers.com
kyost@cblawyers.com

Justin A. Nelson (admitted pro hac vice)
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1000 Louisiana, Suite 5100
Houston, TX 77002-5096
T: (713) 651-9366
jnelson@susmangodfrey.com

Stephen E. Morrissey (admitted pro hac vice)
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800
Seattle, WA 98101-3000
T: (206) 516-3880
smorrissey@susmangodfrey.com

Stephen Shackelford (admitted pro hac vice)
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1301 Avenue of the Americas, 32nd Floor
New York, NY 10019-6023
T: (212) 336-8330
sshackelford@susmangodfrey.com

Davida Brook (admitted pro hac vice)
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1900 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1400
Los Angeles, CA 90067
T: (310) 789-3100
dbrook@susmangodfrey.com

Michael C. Herron
Dartmouth College
Department of Government
6108 Silsby Hall
Hanover, NH 03755-3547
Homepage: http://www.dartmouth.edu/˜
herron
Phone: +1 (603) 646-2693
Mobile: +1 (603) 359-9731
Email: michael.c.herron@dartmouth.edu

Jonathan Rodden
Stanford University
Department of Political Science
Encina Hall Central
616 Serra Street
Stanford, CA 94305
Phone: (650) 723-5219
Fax: (650) 723-1808
Email: jrodden@stanford.edu

STEPHEN DANIEL ANSOLABEHERE
Department of Government
Harvard University
1737 Cambridge Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
sda@gov.harvard.edu

Gary King
Institute for Quantitative Social Science
Harvard University
1737 Cambridge Street
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
GaryKing.org
Direct: (617) 500-7570
King@Harvard.edu
Assistant: (617) 495-9271
king-assist@iq.harvard.edu


Dennis I. Wilenchik Esq.
Lee Miller Esq.
John (Jack) D. Wilenchik Esq.
The Wilenchik & Bartness Building
 2810 North Third Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85004
Phone: (602) 606-2810
jackw@wb-law.com
admin@wb-law.com

https://lawandcrime.com/opinion/supreme-smear-lin-wood-goes-full-q-in-bonkers-tweets-telling-800000-plus-followers-that-chief-justice-roberts-called-trump-a-motherfer-on-a-phone-call/

Supreme Smear: Lin Wood Goes Full Q in Bonkers Tweets Telling
800,000-Plus Followers That Chief Justice Roberts Called Trump a
‘Motherf***er’ on a Phone Call
Matt Naham
Dec 17th, 2020, 5:50 pm





https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/dominion-attorneys-send-brutal-letter-to-trump-campaigns-so-called-star-witness-mellissa-carone/




https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apos-brilliant-lucky-apos-clare-174929103.html

ALM Media

Zack Needles is Global Managing Editor, Regional Brands at ALM. He is
also the Managing Editor of The Legal Intelligencer, Pennsylvania Law
Weekly, Delaware Business Court Insider and Delaware Law Weekly.
Contact him at 215-557-2373 or zneedles@alm.com

https://www.law.com/


'Brilliant and Lucky' Clare Locke Makes Headlines by Keeping Clients Out of Them
November 28, 2018

Libby Locke and Tom Clare of Clare Locke, Washington D.C. (Courtesy photo)

Safeguarding the reputation of prominent clients has long been a
ticket to success in the legal profession, especially in
scandal-plagued Washington, D.C.

It's a skill that's in high demand these days, amid cascading
allegations against powerful media and government figures and
competing claims about who's peddling so-called Fake News—all
supercharged by the #MeToo movement and the polarized politics of the
Trump era.

In other words, it's the perfect environment for Tom Clare and Libby Locke.

The Washington-area husband-and-wife team seems to be everywhere these
days, noted (and sometimes reviled) for their work on behalf of the
unloved and accused. Their Alexandria, Virginia, defamation and
commercial litigation boutique, Clare Locke, hasn't shied away from
the black hat trope put forward by critics who have labeled them
“media assassins.” Instead, their website flaunts their success at
having “killed” stories at prominent publications.

Clare and Locke left the partnership at Kirkland & Ellis and opened
their boutique steps from the Potomac River in 2014, in a Virginian
townhouse with ample roaming room for their dog, Gipper. The pet is
named for either Notre Dame football coach Knute Rockne or former
President Ronald Reagan, depending on whether you believe Clare, a
Fighting Irish alumnus, or Locke, whose favorite president is Reagan.

The duo bristles at the notion that they are hired guns paid to
silence the press. They say the plaintiffs-side defamation work they
do involves three components—pre-publication counseling,
post-publication retraction, and defamation litigation.

“They are worthy adversaries, and they are very good at what they do,”
said Lee Levine, Ballard Spahr senior counsel and a leading First
Amendment attorney defending media clients. “I would describe them as
zealous advocates—and I think it’s fair to say there isn’t an issue in
defamation law in which I agree with them.”

New Media Era

Levine, who is defending The New York Times against a lawsuit brought
by Clare Locke on behalf of former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, said he
has known Clare and Locke for several years. He said few lawyers on
the East Coast have been able to establish a practice comparable to
theirs, which he noted is more commonly found closer to Hollywood.

The decision to break away from Kirkland was inevitable in retrospect.
Clare and Locke proffered that positional conflicts, conflicts created
by increasing corporatization of media ownership, and the need to
offer rate flexibility made leaving Big Law a necessity.

They now lead a team of nine lawyers, including five Kirkland expats
and four recruited from other firms and law schools.

"Our firm culture is incredibly important to us, and so we have always
grown in size methodically and deliberately in order to assemble the
right team," they said in an email. "We are looking for lawyers who
share our mission and our passion for this area of the law. Given
those very specialized criteria, we expect to accomplish future growth
by targeted recruiting efforts rather than through a combination with
another firm."

Clare Locke’s timing was “brilliant and lucky, or some combination of
the two,” said Levine, as the burgeoning boutique scored some high
profile wins that drew new clients to its door. The pair scored a
multimillion-dollar victory against Rolling Stone for University of
Virginia associate dean Nicole Eramo regarding false claims made in
the 2014 article “A Rape on Campus.”

The amount of work arriving on their doorstep has only soared since,
which they attribute to the proliferation of cable television channels
and the explosion of social media and online news. They said
competitive pressures combined with shrinking media budgets have made
institutional checks-and-balances such as fact-checking increasingly
scarce.

“The rise in the number of outlets means, not only a rise in the
number of platforms where defamation can occur, but also intense
competition among these outlets to 'be first' in publishing news,”
Clare and Locke said. “The rush to be first leads to more mistakes
(whether intentional or not), more salacious headlines and content to
attract readership, and thus, more false and damaging articles being
published.”

President Donald Trump’s outspoken criticism of the media—alongside
the conduct of what Clare and Locke call “reckless media outlets” such
as Rolling Stone and Gawker (another adversary)—may have emboldened
potential victims previously intimidated into staying silent. And more
recent legal battles, such as CNN’s dispute with the White House
access for Jim Acosta, may have given ammunition to plaintiffs-side
defamation lawyers such as Clare, who argues that, “journalists do not
get a special hall pass to disobey rules of general applicability.”

“The First Amendment is not magical pixie dust that somehow immunizes
people from any sort of scrutiny from the way they behave or the
like,” Clare said of CNN’s dispute on the Lawyer 2 Lawyer podcast.

Clare Locke is litigating against CNN in a different case—on behalf of
a pediatric heart surgeon who filed a defamation suit in Florida. CNN
has fought to keep its editorial standards secret as part of its
defense in the case.

Levine said he thinks the the number of defamation suits brought by
well-financed public figures has risen in recent years, as the
individuals find such litigation to be a useful tool against the
press. He said courts need to “rise to the occasion” and tell
plaintiffs that such tactics will not work, and he compared the legal
landscape for media to the time “in the early 60s," before the U.S.
Supreme Court's unanimous decision in New York Times v. Sullivan
established the actual malice standard.

Clare and Locke aren't sympathetic to the notion that prominent public
figures have an unfair advantage when it comes to protecting their
reputations. They have represented several clients facing
#MeToo-related accusations, including Jeff Fager, the fired executive
producer of CBS’ “60 Minutes,” and reports have linked them to many
more, including The New York Times’ Glenn Thrush; Kimberly Guilfoyle,
formerly of Fox News; and fired NBC anchor Matt Lauer.

In representing such clients, Clare Locke has argued that the playing
field has tilted substantially toward the accusers, and Locke has
pointed to the controversy surrounding Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s
confirmation fight as evidence. The effect of sexual misconduct
allegations against Kavanaugh contradicted the “Victorian notion” that
women are powerless compared to men, Locke argued in The Wall Street
Journal in September.

“The circus this process has become demonstrates not only the power of
#MeToo, but also its potential as a weapon—and how an audience eager
for victim narratives and sinister power dynamics can be galvanized
without proof to shatter a man’s reputation built over a lifetime of
hard work,” Locke wrote of the confirmation fight.

Since Kavanaugh joined the nation’s highest court, clients have only
continued to line up for the firm. In subsequent weeks, Major League
Baseball and Breitbart, a Trump-supporting media outlet, have
reportedly retained Clare Locke. And given the state of politics and
media, there's no sign of a slowdown anytime soon.


https://www.pli.edu/faculty/tom-clare-23968


Tom Clare
Clare Locke LLP
Alexandria, VA, USA

 Biography

Tom is best known for representing high-profile clients who are
targeted in hostile media investigations or the subject of false
statements in the press. He has handled defamation matters for Fortune
500 companies and individuals, including CEOs, hedge-fund managers,
university presidents, professional athletes and sports teams,
celebrities, journalists, and others who find themselves under
reputational attack.

In March 2019, Tom secured a defamation jury verdict for Dr. Fredric
Eshelman based on false statements from Puma Biotechnology, Inc. The
jury awarded $15.85 million in compensatory and $6.5 million in
punitive damages.  He also represented UVA Associate Dean Nicole Eramo
in her defamation lawsuit against Rolling Stone magazine relating to a
highly publicized article of an alleged gang rape. In November 2016, a
jury found the defendants liable for defamation and awarded Ms. Eramo
$3 million.

Prior to founding Clare Locke LLP, Tom was an equity partner at one of
the nation’s premier litigation firms and has more than 20 years of
experience handling high-stakes commercial litigation matters. He is
ranked in the 2020 Chambers USA Guide for nationwide first amendment
litigation and for global defamation/reputation management in the
Chambers HNW directory. Tom is a Super Lawyer for Business Litigation
and Media and Advertising and a BTI Consulting Client-Service All-Star
MVP.

Associated Items
1 item
Date 11/20/2020
Program or Publication
Format  On-Demand
Watch Now
$1,535.00

Communications Law in the Digital Age 2020

13-Hour Program

See Credit Details Below
Overview

The practice of media and communications law demands the ability to
respond to new challenges arising from digital and social media, and
this program will address recent developments in First Amendment,
defamation, privacy, intellectual property, newsgathering, right of
publicity, reporter’s privilege law and more. Join an expert faculty
of law firm practitioners, in-house counsel, government officials, and
academics, and obtain the legal, strategic, and practical guidance
needed to keep current in these areas of law and technology.

What You Will Learn

• Recent developments in electronic media regulation
• First Amendment updates
• Legislative, judicial, and regulatory developments in data
protection and privacy
• Updates on reporter’s privilege and newsgathering liability
• Important intellectual property decisions
• Current issues in right of publicity law
• Recent developments in Section 230, commercial speech, and anti-SLAPP law
• International media law updates

Special Features

Earn one full hour of Ethics credit in an interactive format!




THOMAS A. CLARE, P.C.
tom@clarelocke.com
(202) 628-7401
10 Prince Street
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
(202) 628-7400
www.clarelocke.com

February 21, 2019
By Email and Federal Express Not for Publication or Attribution

Nick Poser
Senior V.P. and Associate General Counsel
CBS Corporation
51 West 52nd Street
New York, NY 10019
neposer@cbs.com

Bill Owens
Executive Producer, 60 Minutes
CBS Corporation
51 West 52nd Street
New York, NY 10019
owensb@cbsnews.com

Re: 60 Minutes Segment on Opioids

Dear Nick and Bill:

We represent Purdue Pharma L.P. (“Purdue”). I write regarding 60
Minutes’ reporting on
Purdue, specifically with regards to the segment on the U.S. Food and
Drug Administration (“FDA”) and opioid medicines that 60 Minutes is
considering airing this Sunday, February 24, 2019.

Despite multiple meetings, phone calls, and email exchanges between
representatives of Purdue and 60 Minutes Associate Producer Sam
Hornblower (during which detailed information was exchanged), we are
still concerned that Mr. Hornblower and 60 Minutes intend to air a
biased and one-sided segment rife with significant errors and
inaccuracies, and that 60 Minutes will refuse to disclose to its
viewers critical information about the sources it intends to rely on
(and even put on the air), including their personal biases toward
Purdue and their financial incentives in making false and misleading
statements about the company and OxyContin.

With this letter, CBS and 60 Minutes are on notice of the inaccuracies
and errors we
understand may be included in such a segment (and the contradicting
facts demonstrating their falsity) and that 60 Minutes has a duty to
its viewers and to Purdue to make the following disclosures should it
decide to air interviews with or statements from these biased sources.

I. 60 Minutes’ Intended Characterizations and Descriptions of the
Timing and Make-Up of
the FDA’s Initial 1995 Approval of OxyContin and the FDA’s Clarification and
Narrowing of that Approval in 2001 are Inaccurate and Misleading.
Based on meetings, phone calls, and email exchanges with Mr.
Hornblower, we have serious
concerns that he and 60 Minutes will falsely report that (1) in 1995,
the FDA lacked sufficient
evidence to approve OxyContin for distribution, and (2) in 1995, the
FDA did not approve
OxyContin for the treatment of chronic pain, and only in 2001 did the
FDA first broaden its
approval of OxyContin for use in the treatment of patients suffering
from chronic and long-term
pain. These purported statements are demonstrably false and create the
misleading impression that
OxyContin was not initially intended to be used for the treatment of
chronic and long-term pain,
and only after several years of such ‘unapproved use’ did the FDA take
action. In fact, publicly
available information demonstrates that the FDA, in its initial
approval of OxyContin in 1995,
understood that its benefits extended to the treatment of patients
suffering from chronic, long-term
pain, and therefore included that intended and approved use in its
initial approval. Then, six years
later in 2001, the FDA, in light of unexpected widespread abuse of
OxyContin, clarified its safety
warnings to narrow the use of it to patients who are actually
suffering from chronic and long-term
pain (and to eliminate any notion that this important treatment should
be used for any other
purpose).
A. The FDA Approved OxyContin for the Treatment of Chronic and Long-Term
Pain in 1995 Based on Sufficient and Extensive Data and Information.
We understand that 60 Minutes intends to falsely report that the FDA
lacked sufficient
evidence to approve OxyContin in 1995. This is patently false. The FDA
based its approval of
OxyContin on a robust set of clinical trials, which the FDA dubbed at
the time as the “gold standard.”
Though, at the time, only two clinical trials were usually necessary,
Purdue submitted and the FDA
reviewed six controlled clinical studies (involving over 700 patients)
before it approved OxyContin.
Three of these clinical trials were for cancer pain, and one for
osteoarthritis, one for chronic low
back, and one for post-operative pain. The new drug application for
OxyContin consisted of over
40,000 pages in 120 volumes, including 14 pharmacokinetic studies. The
FDA was in possession of
an unprecedented amount of information and evidence demonstrating
OxyContin’s benefits and
effectiveness in treating patients with debilitating pain before it
approved it for use in 1995. Any
statements that imply or suggest that the FDA somehow lacked
sufficient information or evidence
when it made its decision to approve OxyContin in 1995 is false.
In fact, in 2013, when denying a citizen’s petition brought by
Physicians for Responsible
Opioid Prescribing, the FDA stated that “there are numerous
uncontrolled studies that have
evaluated patients on opioids for as long as a year; although some
patients drop out of the studies
over this period of time, many remain on opioid therapy, which may
suggest that they continue to
experience benefits that would warrant the risks of opioid use.” And
even today, the FDA continues
to approve opioids for long-term, chronic pain use and recognizing
that for select patients, opioids
may be the only reasonable and effective therapy for patients seeking
to manage their legitimate
chronic pain.

B. The FDA Expressly Approved OxyContin for Use in the Treatment of Chronic
and Long-Term Pain in 1995, and then Narrowed its Approval to Only Such Use
in 2001.
We understand that 60 Minutes intends to report – inaccurately – that
in 2001, the FDA
broadened the indication for OxyContin to include the treatment of
chronic pain. This is simply
not true; the changes to OxyContin’s label that were required by the
FDA in 2001 narrowed the
patient population for which OxyContin was intended; importantly,
however, it did not add a
chronic pain indication as OxyContin has been approved for chronic
pain since its initial approval
in 1995.
The FDA initially approved OxyContin “for the management of moderate
to severe pain
where use of an opioid analgesic is appropriate for more than a few
days.” The original label (which
is enclosed with highlighted sections noted below for your reference)
included numerous references
to the medicine’s use (and approval) for chronic or long-term pain,
including the following
statements:
“During chronic therapy, especially for non-cancer pain syndromes,
the continued need for around-the-clock opioid therapy should be
reassessed periodically (e.g., every 6 to 12 months) as appropriate.”
“Physical dependence and tolerance are not unusual during chronic
opioid therapy.”
“It should be expected, however, that a fraction of cancer patients will
develop some degree of tolerance and require progressively higher
dosages of OxyContin to maintain pain control during chronic
treatment.”
“Neonates whose mothers have been taking oxycodone chronically
may exhibit respiratory depression and/or withdrawal symptoms,
either at birth and/or in the nursery.”
“The clinical relevance of a difference of this magnitude is low for a
drug intended for chronic usage at individualized dosages, and there
was no male/female difference detected for efficacy or adverse events
in clinical trials.”
“There was no evidence of oxycodone and metabolite accumulation
during 8 months of therapy.”
“There was a significant decrease in acute opioid-related side effects,
except for constipation, during the first several weeks of therapy.”
“Patients should be advised that if they have been receiving treatment
with OxyContin for more than a few weeks and cessation of therapy
is indicated, it may be appropriate to taper the OxyContin dose,rather
than abruptly discontinue it, due to the risk of precipitating
withdrawal symptoms.”
“The intent of the titration period is to establish a patient-specific
q12h dose that will maintain adequate analgesia with acceptable side
effects for as long as pain relief is necessary. Should pain recur then
the dose can be incrementally increased to re-establish pain control.
The method of therapy adjustment outlined above should be
employed to re-establish pain control.”
And, these clearly identified statements on OxyContin’s original label
echo the FDA Medical
Officer’s review of OxyContin when it was first approved:
“[C]ontrolled release oxycodone was studied in an adequate number
of patients to reveal adverse events at the 1 % level.…It showed an
acceptable level of risk associated with its use in the chronic pain
population.”
In July 2001, the FDA, recognizing that OxyContin was being widely
abused, added a black
box warning and narrowed the indication to “the management of moderate
to severe pain when a
continuous, around the clock analgesic is needed for an extended
period of time.” The FDA’s
meeting notes and congressional testimony confirm that the purpose of
the label changes was to add
important safety warnings and limit the use of the medicine only to
appropriate patients with
chronic pain.
In April 2001, the FDA acknowledged in a meeting that:
“The indication of ‘’moderate to severe pain for patients who need to
be on opiates for more than a few days” is broad and may not
adequately reflect the intended population. The label should clearly
state that this drug product should only be used patients who require
opiates for an extended period of time, that it should not be utilized
for first-time treatment of pain, and that it is not for intermittent
use.”
Furthermore, the FDA’s Dr. John Jenkins testified before the Senate in
2002 concerning
this narrowing clarification of the approved uses of OxyContin (while
also acknowledging Purdue’s
participation in that very process):
“In July of last year Purdue Pharma, working in cooperation with
FDA, significantly strengthened the warnings and precautions in the
labeling for OxyContin.…Furthermore, the labeling for OxyContin
now makes clear that it is only approved by FDA for treatment of
moderate to severe pain in patients who require around-the-clock
narcotics for an extended period of time.”
As the record demonstrates, the FDA, based on a mountain of data,
research and evidence,
approved OxyContin for use by patients seeking to manage and treat a
specific type and level of pain(which included chronic, long-term
pain) originally in 1995. Then in 2001, the FDA determined,
in consultation with Purdue, to add a strengthened warning to
OxyContin’s labels narrowing its
approved and intended use to individuals suffering from chronic,
long-term pain. Any statements
by 60 Minutes (or any sources or individuals it intends to interview
or publish statements from)1 in
any forthcoming statement would be demonstrably false and should not
be referenced.
II. 60 Minutes Intends to Include Interviews and Statements from
Sources Who are Biased
Against and Have a Personal and Financial Incentive to Negatively Comment About
Purdue.
As part of its one-sided segment on opioids, we understand that, based
on conversations and
communications with Mr. Hornblower, 60 Minutes has already interviewed
or intends to interview
two individuals who are well-known and vocal critics of Purdue and
OxyContin – Dr. Andrew
Kolodny and former FDA Commissioner David Kessler. Both of these
individuals are not only
inherently biased towards (and vocally critical of) Purdue and
OxyContin, but are also, based on
their paid-for consulting and advising roles for both 60 Minutes and
for plaintiff-side law firms
involved in litigation against Purdue, incapable of providing a
neutral and fair perspective on the
history and current state of opioid prescription use in the United States.
Dr. Kolodny has admitted, in the form of a court-filed expert
disclosure report made under
the penalty of perjury, to the fact that he is a paid consultant and
advisor, earning $725/hour for
his services.2 He also lists on his CV that he submitted to the U.S.
House of Representatives
Committee on Energy and Commerce on February 27, 2018 as part of his
required disclosures prior
to his testimony under oath, that he served in a “CONSULTING AND
ADVISING” role for “CBS
60 Minutes” in 2017 as part of 60 Minutes’ “The Whistleblower”
segment.3 A copy of this expert
disclosure report and Dr. Kolodny’s CV he submitted for his
congressional testimony is enclosed
for your reference. The facts demonstrate that Dr. Kolodny admits that
he worked for 60 Minutes
as a consultant and advisor within the last two years (and on a
segment that touched on substantially
similar subject matter is this segment) and that he is also a paid
consultant on behalf of plaintiffs
currently involved in active litigation with Purdue.
In that same vein and upon information and belief, we understand that
Dr. Kessler has also
performed extensive work for and has long consulted with and on behalf
of plaintiff-side law firms
who are or have been engaged in litigation against Purdue regarding
the very same issues he purports to comment on for 60 Minutes’ planned
segment.4 These types of consulting and advising roles for
law firms involved in active or potential litigation are rarely if
ever performed for free.
It is incumbent upon 60 Minutes, as the ultimate publisher and airer
of segments featuring
biased and conflicted individuals like Dr. Kolodny and Dr. Kessler,5
to thoroughly investigate and
vet its own sources and intended on-screen interviewees to confirm any
such biases and financial
incentives for promoting certain viewpoints and commentary. And where
such biases and financial
or otherwise personal motives to provide one-sided, incomplete, and
even false commentary on a
subject matter such as opioid use in the United States exists (as it
clearly does with Dr. Kolodny and
Dr. Kessler who are, at a minimum, paid-for consultants by individuals
and parties who are currently
suing Purdue), 60 Minutes has a duty to its viewers to clearly and
unambiguously disclose such bias
and the facts supporting their incentive and motivation for their
viewpoints and commentary during
any aired segment in which Dr. Kolodny and Dr. Kessler participate in,
and to confront such bias
head-on.
* * *
60 Minutes obviously has the right to make fair comment on matters of
public concern, and
that certainly extends to reporting on the opioid crisis in a balanced
and fair-minded manner.
However, reporting that includes demonstrably false and otherwise
misleading commentary
regarding the history of the FDA’s thorough approval process for
OxyContin and the clear and
unambiguous warnings and precautions both the FDA and Purdue have
taken over the years to
promote appropriate uses of OxyContin and that relies on the biased
and financially-incentivized
opinions of vocal critics of Purdue is neither fair nor balanced reporting.
Purdue recognizes the significant public health challenge that the
opioid and other addiction
crises pose and the impact they have on families across the U.S.
Purdue understands and has
embraced the importance of addressing this issue head on, both through
direct action and a
balanced and fair national discussion. To that end, Purdue has
submitted earlier today, under
separate cover, an on-the-record statement to 60 Minutes (enclosed for
your reference). We fully
expect that 60 Minutes will include Purdue’s full statement and
otherwise accurately represent
Purdue’s statement in the segment (and in any articles or other
accompanying reporting on the
segment posted online or elsewhere).
We trust that you understand the seriousness of these issues. We
request that you, in your
respective capacities as counsel for CBS and as the Executive Producer
of 60 Minutes, (1) refrain
from making the demonstrably false claims outlined in this letter
on-air in any forthcoming segment
and likewise ensure that the critical and necessary facts detailed
above are fairly and accurately
represented in any segment 60 Minutes may air that references Purdue
or OxyContin, (2) that CBS
and 60 Minutes thoroughly investigate and vet the bias and financial
incentives of any sources it
intends to rely on for any such segment (whether they are
on-background or on-camera interviewees), including Dr. Kolodny and
Dr. Kessler, and to fairly and accurately include in any forthcoming
segment the results of that vetting and investigation in order to
fully disclose to viewers the nature
of any such source’s bias and financial motivation to comment
negatively about Purdue or on the
opioid crisis, and (3) to include Purdue’s full, on-the-record
statement (sent under separate cover)
and to otherwise accurately and fairly represent Purdue’s statement in
any on-air segment or
accompanying reporting (whether published online or elsewhere).
I look forward to your prompt response confirming receipt. I am
available to discuss any
questions you may have on these subjects.


Very truly yours,
Thomas A. Clare, P.C.


CC: Sam Hornblower, Associate Producer, 60 Minutes, hornblowers@cbsnews.com
Enclosures


1 A media defendant can be liable for republishing or participating in
the publication of another’s
false statement if it acted with a reckless disregard for whether the
statement was true or false. Cianci
v. New Times Pub. Co., 639 F.2d 54, 60 (2d Cir. 1980); see also St.
Amant v. Thompson, 390 U.S.
727, 732 (1968) (recklessness may be found “where there are obvious
reasons to doubt the
veracity of the informant or the accuracy of his reports.”).
2 See Dec. 21, 2018 State’s Expert Witness Disclosures, Exhibit J,
Case No. CJ-2017-81.
3 See Feb. 27, 2018 Andrew Kolodny’s “Truth in Testimony” Witness
Disclosure Requirement,
Committee on Energy and Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives.
4 See, e.g., July 27, 2016 Decl. of David Kessler, Case No:
30-2014-00725287-CU-BT-CXC (enclosed
for your reference).
5 See Cianci, 639 F.2d at 60; St. Amant, 390 U.S. at 732.




Tuesday, September 08, 2020
Why is Ridgeback Biotherapeutics Trying to Suppress Adverse Opinions
by Issuing Frivolous Defamation Threats?

Over the past several months, I have posted a number of articles about
the campaign of intimidating copyright demand letters from Mathew
Higbee, who tries to extract money from individuals, nonprofits and
small businesses by threatening to file frivolous copyright lawsuits.
This is the first in what I expect will be series of articles about a
different sort of campaign of frivolous threats: companies that try to
clean up their reputations by hiring lawyers to send frivolous threats
of libel litigation.  I'm not sure which is worse.

Today’s story begins with an article that ran in the Washington Post
back in June, 2020, focusing on the role played by a small Miami-based
pharmaceutical corporation, run by hedge fund managers and called
Ridgeback Biopharmaceutics. The Post noted that Ridgeback had invested
in a potential antiviral therapy, developed at Emory University with
public financing, but that, when it failed to secure federal financing
to develop the drug further, it made a killing by selling its rights
to Merck. These facts, the reporter suggested, illustrate “the
perception that companies are profiteering during a global medical
crisis — especially in cases where inventions were funded by
taxpayers.” The article also tied the situation to the revelations
from BARDA whistleblower Rick Bright, who cited this as one of the
examples of political pressure being applied to secure federal
financing for private profit.

The article quoted a few nongovernmental sources commenting on the
situation, including the executive of a rival biotech firm; Harvard
Medical School Professor Aaron Kesselheim, and Jamie Love, the founder
of Knowledge Ecology International. Both Kesselheim and Love were
quoted as expressing concern that Ridgeback was “flipping” the
medication – Kesselheim said that it was analogous to a house flipper,
while Love said that “'molecule-flipping' is a good characterization
of what it is.” This language was reflected in the headline of the
article: “Hedge fund manager stands to profit on ‘flip’ of
taxpayer-funded coronavirus drug.” Love also noted that it had, in the
past, been unusual to see much engagement by private investors in
medications addressed to Ebola and SARS, which have been “backwater
areas in neglected disease.” But now, he said, private parties were
rushing to invest.

Ridgeback’s Libel Offensive

Ridgeback’s owner, it seems, is the unusual capitalist who finds it
insulting to be accused of having made a quick profit by finding
investment opportunities in an arena long neglected by other
investors. But instead of simply sending a note explaining why it
disagreed, and trying to persuade its critics based on the merits of
the evidence, Ridgeback hired Thomas Clare, a well-known plaintiffs’
libel lawyer, to complain to the Washington Post’s editors and legal
department about the article; the result was that the Post made some
minor changes in the article, described in an editor’s note. Mr. Clare
claims that the Post “agreed” to make these changes (although it is
not clear that there has been any “agreement.”) But the article’s
central point, about molecule- flipping and profiteering, remained
unchanged.

Ridgeback then turned its sights on Jamie Love, sending him a  letter
that warned that the Washington Post had already changed its story in
response to its “concerns”; stated that Love’s “flipping” statement
was “demonstrably false"; and ”demand[ed] that [Love] set the record
straight by immediately retracting your defamatory remarks.” Mr. Clare
made a few factual representations about what his client had done
vis-a-vis the chemical on question. His letter continued by contending
the Love had wrongly used the word “backwater” to denigrate the
African continent as well as China and Hong King, and seeking
retraction of that statement as well (a later letter appears to
suggest that Love’s allegedly calling Africa a backwater was “racist”
-- that accusation could be itself defamatory if it were not so
plainly a baseless opinion; name-calling is generally not defamatory).
To underline the legal peril in which Love had supposedly placed
himself, Mr. Clare dropped a footnote stating that the letter should
be considered a demand for retraction under section 770.02 of the
Florida Statutes. It is my assumption that Mr. Clare was hoping that,
if he could intimidate Love into retracting his use of the term
“flipping,” he could then go back to the Post and ask for further
changes. Interestingly enough, Mr. Clare did not make any complaint to
the Harvard professor who had also been quoted by the Post using the
term “flipping.” It is my assumption that Mr. Clare and his client
figured that the Harvard professor would be very able to defend
himself against a frivolous libel claim, but that Love might be an
softer target.

Love, however, did not back down. Instead, he  wrote back to explain
why he had said what he said, and asking a detailed list of pointed
questions questions, asking as well for documentation of Mr. Clare’s
statements praising his client. For example, he said he could not
assess the accuracy of Ridgeback’s denial of “molecule flipping”
without seeing Ridgeback’s agreements with Emory and with Merck,
outlining the companies’ relative roles in the development of
EIDD-2801, the relevant COVID medication. He also noted that he had
not, as Mr. Clare claimed, said that Africa or Hong Kong is a
backwater – he said that certain diseases have been neglected and thus
have been backwaters for investment. He noted that, instead of
expounding Ridgeback’s role in developing EIDD-2801, Mr. Clare’s
letter was largely devoted to praising his client’s work om mAb114, an
Ebola medication. Apart from noting that this was something of a
tangent from the claim that Ridgeback had been defamed about its COVID
work, Love posed some pointed questions about the relative shares of
government and Ridgeback funding in this work. Love concluded, “if
Ridgeback wants some type of compliment for its efforts in this space,
regarding the risking of its own money, I . . . would need facts and
more than just a letter from a boutique law firm that specializes in
defamation litigation.”

After Love had received no response to these questions, I followed up
Love’s query a few days later with some questions of my own. I told
Mr. Clare that I was working on an article about bullying libel demand
letters, not only asking whether Ridgeback was ready to answer Love’s
questions and provide him with documents, but also pointing out some
reasons to think that Ridgeback could not succeed on a defamation
claim. First of all, Mr. Clare had not so much taken issue with the
veracity of Love’s statements as quoted by the newspaper as with the
context into which the Washington Post had placed the quotations; but
if that was the issue, then Ridgeback’s gripe was with the article and
not with Love. Second, given that Mr. Clare wanted Love to be afraid
of being sued because of Mr. Clare’s kvelling about how the mighty
Washington Post had already backed down, it was remarkable that the
Post story had retained the assertion that Ridgeback was guilty of
flipping. So if Mr. Clare was satisfied with the Post’s clarifications
as he was claiming to be, why was he threatening to sue Love for using
the term? And as for the “backwater” comment, no reasonable person
could read the quotation from Love and think he was characterizing
specific geographical areas as backwaters – he said that certain
diseases were backwaters for investment, and not only is there no
reason to think that what Love said is false, but Emory University
itself has described the project from which its COVID-19 treatment
emerged as being devoted to attacking diseases that are “generally not
profitable enough for industry to pursue, and thus are considered
neglected diseases.”

Moreover, even Love’s “backwater” reference was false, even if it was
not merely an opinion, defamation claims can be asserted only by the
person about whom the defamatory statement was made – how would
Ridgeback have standing to sue for alleged defamation of a continent
or a disease? Plainly, with regard to Love’s use of the term
“backwater,” in this respect, Mr. Clare’s letter is just plain
chest-thumping intended to intimidate both because its sender is a big
macher, and because a longer letter citing additional complaints might
make Love worry more about his potential exposure.

My note to Clare also pointed to the caption on his letter to Love,
"Not for Publication or Attribution."  I was wondering whether, like
an earlier Virginia defamation lawyer, John Dozier, he thought he
could prevent the victims of his bullying from calling public
attention to his demands.  This caption is apparently a common feature
of demand letters from his firm.  See here, here and here.

Ridgeback’s Response to Being Accused of Bullying

Ridgeback responded,  first to me and  then to Love, by repeating its
assertion that it was not molecule flipping, but it stoutly refused to
produce any evidence to support its contentions, and the tone of its
responses was, in a number of respects, considerably milder. Both
letters asserted that Ridgeback has a continuing role in the
development of the COVID medication, but neither letter included any
specific dollar amounts, neither compared the amount of taxpayer
investment with the amount of private investment; and most important
they did not include any of the documentation that Love and I had
requested. They letters seemed, at best, a face-saving maneuver
accompanying Ridgeback’s declaration that it was not going to sue Love
despite his failure to meet the demand for retraction.

The letters contained statements that I consider false. First, Mr.
Clare declared to me that “any suggestion that Ridgeback has
threatened to sue Mr. Love is completely false”; to Love, he wrote
that I “seem[] to be under the misapprehension that Ridgeback has
threatened to sue you for libel . . ..For the avoidance of all doubt,
Ridgeback has never made such a threat, and we sent our previous
letter to (1) identify the false, misleading, and damaging statements
that you made and (2) determine whether you were quoted accurately.”
He went on to say that, given that the Washington Post “has made
retractions,” after what Mr. Clare told me was his “confronting” the
Post and engaging with its libel counsel (does he admit to threatening
to sue the Post>), he was not going to bother engaging any back
-and-forth with Love about the conclusory facts that he was asserting
in his letters.

Well, no. Mr. Clare’s letter to Love did not simply “request” that
Love clarify his remarks (although his second letter to Love phrases
this as a request). He told Love that his quoted assertion about
Ridgeback was “demonstrably false,” and the letter was a demand, not a
request “I demand that you set the record straight by immediately
retracting your defamatory remarks.” Lest Love be in any doubt that he
was facing the prospect of being sued, Mr. Clare dropped a footnote to
the Florida retraction statute, which limits the damages that can be
awarded in a libel suit if the alleged defamer responds appropriately
to a demand for retraction. The letter closed with a warning that Love
should “treat this with the seriousness that Ridgeback deserves.”

Now, Tom Clare is too sophisticated a lawyer to think that a letter
like this would not be treated as a threat of litigation, and, indeed,
I have chatted with a number of friends in DC who represent media
companies in libel litigation, including against Mr. Clare. Every one
of them indicated either (or both) that the letter should fairly be
read as at least implicit threatening to sue, or that, if one of their
clients received a letter like this, indeed from a libel specialist
lawyer, their client would be prudent to assume that they faced suit
if they failed to retract.

It is a mild threat, to be sure – it did not explicitly say “we will
sue you,” and it did not include litigation hold language. But it
seems to me that Mr. Clare imperils his own credibility by denying
that Ridgeback ever threatened to sue.

Conclusions – IS Ridgeback a Molecule Flipper?

I generally recommend that when people received demand letters, the
best response is to describe, in level-headed manner, why they are
right and why they were entitled to say what they said; it is best to
write such letters in consultation with potential litigation counsel
(even if the lawyer does not sign the letter). Love’s letter – which
so far as I can tell was written before obtaining potential libel
counsel— was very well done. He did a very good job of keeping the
temperature down, and his side comments on the impact of cancer on a
family represent a nice personal touch. And the upshot was a complete
capitulation on Ridgeback’s part.

And more than that: it seems to me that the upshot of the exchange of
correspondence is to raise one’s level of confidence in the fairness
of Love (and Kesselheim) having characterized Ridgeback as a molecule
flipper.

I come to this question without any predispositions, other than the
fact that I have known Jamie Love for many years and I respect his
judgment; and colleagues at Public Citizen who do specialize in these
issues share Love’s concerns, especially in light of the questions
Love posed and Ridgeback’s having blown them off. Love and Kesselheim
gave their reasons, and although Mr. Clare disputes them, his demand
letter to Love said that it is “demonstrably false.” In libel law
terms, to say something that is “demonstrably false” could be only an
assertion that it is capable of being proved false – that is, to say,
the phrase can be only an assertion the statement is one of fact,
which could be true or false, and not of opinion, which is not
actionable.

And most important, when given the opportunity to document falsity,
Mr. Clare punted, saying that it is not worth presenting evidence on
the question because the Washington Post has already “made
retractions.” But of course the Post has not retracted the part of its
article that said that characterized Ridgeback’s actions as a “flip.”
At most, it appears to me that the Post made some small clarifications
on issues that are tangential to the gist of the concerns that Mr.
Clare expressed to Love. Moreover, Mr. Clare has undercut the
credibility of the assertions made in his own letters by directly
denying having threatened to sue Love, and by asserting in his letters
that Love referred to Africa as backwater. Neither of these statements
is remotely true. So, if the statement that Ridgeback is a molecule
flipper is just as false (or just as true) as the statements that
Ridgeback never threatened to sue Love and that Love called Africa a
backwater, then it would appear that there is good reason to believe
that Ridgeback is a molecule flipper.

I do give Mr. Clare credit, however, for telling Love explicitly that
Love need no longer be concerned that he is facing suit for his
statements. Unlike Mathew Higbee, who commonly leaves the targets of
his threatening letters to worry about whether a lawsuit is coming
even after he and his client decide not to pursue litigation, Mr.
Clare showed his class by retracting his threat of litigation – if
only after claiming that he had never made a threat in the first
place.



https://www.citizen.org/news/how-to-protect-the-results-if-there-is-a-disputed-election/

October 30, 2020
How To Protect the Results if There Is a Disputed Election

By Bret Thompson

Millions of Americans who weren’t alive for Bush v. Gore, the Supreme
Court case that settled the 2000 election, will be casting their first
presidential ballots this year. While those who remember Florida’s
hanging chad debacle have particular reason to be wary for how the
mechanics of this year’s election will unfold, there are good reasons
for all of us to be concerned.

The biggest reason, of course, is President Donald Trump and his
repeated refusals to affirm that he’ll accept the results of an
election that doesn’t turn out in his favor. This is particularly
worrisome given:

    his endless campaign to sow distrust in the media and experts;
    his propensity for lying;
    and his ability to directly communicate with his most ardent
supporters via text, email, social media, and alt-right media, thus
bypassing traditional gatekeepers.

Even if Trump doesn’t actively stoke discord on or after Election Day,
there are still additional reasons to think this year’s election may
play out unusually. A record number of people have already voted, many
in ways they haven’t before, whether by mail or early in-person.
Additionally, the effects of the pandemic and social distancing
measures will cast a long shadow over precincts and counting rooms
across the country.

While it’s understandable to be worried, don’t be afraid! Public
Citizen is collaborating with over 150 different organizations to form
the Protect the Results coalition. Listening to the will of the people
by following a peaceful transition of power is a hallmark of American
democracy. Protect the Results is organizing Americans, regardless of
party affiliation, to mobilize to defend the valid results of the
election, whether their preferred candidate wins or loses. So far over
375 events in every state have been scheduled should we need to take
to the streets. The New Yorker recently profiled the coalition
discussing how we’re working to ensure that every vote is counted, and
how important it is that the losing candidate put their ego aside and
concede for the good of our country.

So make sure to cast your ballot and then pledge to take action, if
necessary, with Public Citizen and Protect the Results.

https://www.citizen.org/news/its-time-to-re-enter-reality-and-formally-begin-bidens-transition-process/

It’s Time To Re-Enter Reality And Formally Begin Biden’s Transition Process

WASHINGTON, D.C – Trump-appointed General Services Administration
administrator, Emily W. Murphy is refusing to sign off on a key
document needed to formally begin the transition process and to
recognize Joe Biden as the winner of the election and president-elect.
Murphy is the person tasked with officially affirming Biden has won
the election on behalf of the Trump administration – something Trump
has refused to do. She needs to sign a letter to release funds to the
Biden transition team through a process called ascertainment. This
would mark the first formal acknowledgment from the Trump
administration that Biden has won the election, and would unlock
access to national security tools to streamline background checks and
additional funds to pay for training and incoming staff. The following
statement was released by Public Citizen president, Robert Weissman:

“Under the terms of the Presidential Transition Act, the GSA
administrator is charged with making an “ascertainment” that the
election has been resolved. That determination starts the formal
transition process, enabling the incoming administration transition
team to gain access to funds and equipment, to start
conflict-of-interest vetting for potential nominees, and, most
importantly, to begin liaising with top officials of the outgoing
administration.

“This is a simple and straightforward process designed to make
government work, to facilitate an effective start to the new
administration. It has no partisan slant.

“Unfortunately, Murphy is infusing partisanship – at the expense of
the American people – into the process. Murphy is outrageously
refusing to acknowledge what all independent observers know to be
true: Joe Biden won the election. In refusing to make an ascertainment
of Biden’s victory, she is foiling the transition process, leaving the
incoming Biden administration less well equipped to address the
coronavirus pandemic, the economic crisis, and national security,
among other crucial matters.

“That Donald Trump can’t come to terms with his defeat is no excuse
for Murphy not doing her job. Nor are the Trump administration’s
lawsuits; Murphy’s ascertainment does not influence court cases or the
Electoral College. If for some reason the results of the election were
reversed, no damage would be done for having started and then stopped
the transition process. On the other hand, every moment of Murphy’s
delay is another setback for democracy and government preparation to
address the nation’s urgent needs.”



From: Paul Levy
Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 12:28 PM
To: 'Daniel Watkins'
Cc: 'Tom Clare'
Subject: RE: Ridgeback Biotherapeutics

I have two more questions: Given that you disclaim having threatened
James Love with being sued if he did not comply with your “demand for
retraction under Florida Statute § 770.02,” are you planning to tell
Love that the prospect of litigation should not be a reason for him to
honor your “demand that [he] set the record straight by immediately
retracting [his allegedly] defamatory remarks,” and that he should
only take action assuming that he is persuaded by your arguments and
evidence? (And might you acknowledge, in all candor, that despite the
absence of a sentence explicitly threatening to sue, a reasonable
reader of the letter might take it that way?)

Second, I am curious about your use of the word “agreed” in describing
the Post’s clarifications and editor’s note: do you have an
“agreement” with the Washington Post concerning the clarification and
note, with a commitment not to sue them for what remains? Or would it
be more fair to characterize the Post’s actions as unilateral in
response to your “confronting” it, but without any “agreement” between
the two sides?


From: Paul Levy
Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2020 5:19 PM
To: 'Daniel Watkins' <daniel@clarelocke.com>
Cc: Tom Clare <tom@clarelocke.com>
Subject: RE: Ridgeback Biotherapeutics

Thanks. I will look forward to seeing your letter to James Love along
with the documents that he requested. When you say “later this week,”
I assume you mean by tomorrow? Certainly I can hold off publishing
until then. Will you be bcc’ing me on the letter?

Given that you go to some length to describe “confronting” the
Washington Post -- I take it that this means you acknowledge
threatening to sue the Post even though you say that you did not
threaten to sue Love – I would like to take a look at the letter you
sent to the Post, in addition to the documents I requested in my
previous email..


From: Daniel Watkins <daniel@clarelocke.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2020 9:32 AM
To: Paul Levy <plevy@citizen.org>
Cc: Tom Clare <tom@clarelocke.com>
Subject: Re: Ridgeback Biotherapeutics

Dear Paul:
Please see the attached, sent on behalf of Ridgeback Biotherapeutics.

Regards,
Daniel

Daniel P. Watkins | Associate
CLARE LOCKE LLP
10 Prince Street | Alexandria, Virginia 22314
(202) 628-7407 - direct | (804) 426-9454 - cell
daniel@clarelocke.com | www.clarelocke.com


From: Paul Levy <plevy@citizen.org>
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2020 6:35 PM
To: Tom Clare
Subject: Ridgeback Biotherapeutics

I am working on an article about Ridgeback Biotherapeutics, and about
the ways in which some companies use tendentious threats of libel
litigation to try to clean up their reputations by suppressing adverse
opinions.

In that regard, I have read the July 14, 2020 demand letter that you
sent to James
Love, as well as his August 17, 2020 response to you.

Has any response been sent to the questions and document requests posed in
James Love’s email? If not, would you or your client care to respond now?

I am also wondering why your client would have standing to complain
about statements that you say are unfair to Africa and “China / Hong
Kong”; why your client took the statement to BE about Africa and/or
China and Hong Kong; and, indeed why the word “backwater,” as applied
to a continent, a country or a city – or, indeed, to a disease – would
not merely be an opinion. I would also appreciate your comment on how
your client could bring a proper libel claim against someone who has
been quoted in a newspaper article based on the fact that, apparently,
your client does not like the context in which the reporter placed the
quotation. Given the phrasing of the prefatory note in the Post, I
take it that your demand letter to the Post resulted in changes that
satisfied your client, even though the headline still contains the
word “flip.” Or, are you still threatening litigation against the
Post?

I am also wondering about the facts (1) that your demand letter took
particular umbrage at the analogy between Ridgeback’s activities and
the flipping of real estate, but (2) that, so far as I can understand,
no demand letter was sent to Aaron Kesselheim, who was quoted in the
very same Post article as making an express comparison between
Ridgeback and flipping houses. So I am wondering why just to James
Love, and not to the Harvard professor? Might it have had anything to
do with the assumption that a Harvard professor would be better able
to defend himself against a libel suit than the head of a small
nonprofit?

Although I am a lawyer, I do not represent anybody in this matter.
However, I am being cautious by writing to your client’s counsel. If I
should be directing my questions to your client instead, please let me
know.

And please note that I do intend to publish, and attribute, some or
all of the language your letter. Please let me know if the “Not for
Publication or Attribution” legend is a common feature of your demand
letters..

Paul Alan Levy
Public Citizen Litigation Group
1600 20th Street NW
Washington, D.C. 20009
(202) 588-7725
@paulalanlevy
https://www.citizen.org/article/internet-free-speech/ [citizen.org]

DISCLAIMER: This e-mail message and any attachments are intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain information that is confidential or legally
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of
this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately
and permanently delete this message and any attachments.



https://www.citizen.org/article/internet-free-speech/

Internet Free Speech

The rapid growth of the internet and internet technologies created a
powerful opportunity for individuals to be heard on a wide variety of
issues, including  government, the corporations that have an
increasing role in economic security, and unions that represent their
labor interests.

Public Citizen has developed a program of litigation and other forms
of advocacy to protect the rights of these individuals against
entities that seek to curtail or suppress the exchange of ideas and
criticism that is enabled by this online platforms.

View Public Citizen’s Internet Free Speech Cases
Guide for Bloggers and Non-Profit Organizations About Writing with Libel in Mind

This guide discusses the elementary principles of libel law and
explains how to prepare for and conduct a pre-publication libel
review.

View the Guide
Statement of Public Citizen’s Paul Levy on Maryland House Bill 263

In testimony to the Maryland legislature on February 10, 2016, Paul
Levy discussed a pending anti-SLAPP bill and suggested changes to
protect consumers’ speech on matters of public interest.

View the Statement
Legal Perils and Legal Rights of Internet Speakers

This outline contains legal citations, links to relevant web sites,
and other resources.

View the Outline
Litigating Civil Subpoenas to Identify Anonymous Internet Speakers

This 2011 article by Paul Alan Levy explains how to defend against
subpoenas, with citations to relevant cases (published in Litigation,
the journal of the Litigation Section of the American Bar
Association.)

View the Article
A Guide to Fair Use in Posting Soccer Video Clips

View the Guide
Developments in Dendrite

This 2012 article, published in Florida Coastal Law Review, examines
developments in the caselaw governing subpoenas to identify anonymous
internet speakers.

View the Article
Introduction to Section 230

Internet Users Are Liable Only for Their Own Content – An Introduction
to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act

View the Article


https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/money-and-power/news/a8479/robert-trump/

Who Was Donald Trump's Brother, Robert Trump?

“He was not just my brother, he was my best friend,” said the
President of his younger brother, who died August 15 age 71.
By Matthew Kassel       

Aug 16, 2020
republican presidential nominee donald trump holds election night
event in new york city
Chip SomodevillaGetty Images

    Robert Trump, Donald Trump's youngest brother, died on Saturday
August 15 in New York City. The White House had recently confirmed
that Robert has been hospitalized in Manhattan, and the President
visited his brother the day before he died. “He was not just my
brother, he was my best friend,” the president said in a statement.

    While he had not been in the media spotlight as much as his older
sibling, Robert was back in the news this summer, as his niece Mary
Trump published a tell-all about her family called Too Much and Never
Enough: How My Family Created the World's Most Dangerous Man. Her
publisher, Simon & Schuster, describes the text as a “revelatory,
authoritative portrait of Donald J. Trump and the toxic family that
made him.”

    Robert requested a temporary restraining order in an attempt to
stop the book from being published. In a statement to the New York
Times, he said he was "deeply disappointed" in his niece's decision to
publish the book. “Her attempt to sensationalize and mischaracterize
our family relationship after all of these years for her own financial
gain is both a travesty and injustice to the memory of my late
brother, Fred, and our beloved parents,” he said. “I and the rest of
my entire family are so proud of my wonderful brother, the president,
and feel that Mary’s actions are truly a disgrace.”


SUPREME COURT- STATE OF NEW YORK
DUTCHESS COUNTY
Present:
Hon. HAL B. GREENWALD
Justice.
SUPREME COURT: DUTCHESS COUNTY


ROBERT S. TRUMP,
Plaintiff, DECISION AND ORDER
Index No. 22020-51585
-against- Motion Seq. No. 1
MARY L. TRUMP and SIMON & SCHUSTER,
INC.,
Defendants.


"The following NYSCEF documents were reviewed and considered by the
Court in rendering the within Decision and Order.

NYSCEF Doc. Nos. 1-9, 11-22, 24-45, 46-48, 49, 50-54, 55, 56-78, 79,
80, 81-103, 104, 105-109, 110-115, 116-118, 119, 122-124, 125-126,
128, 129-130, 132-134

RELEVANT FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Frederick Christ Trump, (Fred Trump) a prominent New York City real
estate developer, was born October 11, 1905 and died June 25, 1999. He
married Mary Anne Macleod on January 11, 1936 and they had five (5)
children, Maryanne Trump Barry (born 1937), Fred Trump, Jr.
(1938-1981), Elizabeth Trump Grau (born 1942), Donald Trump (born
1946) and Robert Trump (born 1948). Mary Anne Trump died on August 7,
2000. Litigation concerning the Estates of Fred Trump and of Mary Anne
Trump, as well as multiple intra-family disputes were conducted in
Queens County Surrogate’s Court, (Will of Fred C. Trump, File No
3949-1999) and Nassau County Supreme Court, Trump v. Trump, Index No.
6795-2000). Both matters were settled by an “Agreement and
Stipulation” (the Agreement) dated April 10, 2001. As it pertains to
the instant matter, the Agreement was signed by Donald J. Trump,
Maryanne Trump Barry and Plaintiff, ROBERT S. TRUMP, as “Proponents”
and Fred C. Trump, III and Defendant MARY L. TRUMP, as
“Respondents/Objectants”. Plaintiff ROBERT S. TRUMP seeks a
preliminary injunction against defendants MARY L. TRUMP and SIMON &
SCHUSTER, INC. (S&S) premised upon the terms set forth in the
aforesaid Agreement."





"The United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit in Democratic
National Committee v. Republican National Committee, 673 F.3d 192
(2012) enforced a Consent Decree entered by the DNC and RNC. The terms
in the Decree to restrict disclosure of specific information were
found to be nonviolative of the restricted party’s First Amendment
rights since consideration had been exchanged.

Another factor to be considered by this Court is what is the status of
publication? According to Jonathan Karp, CEO of S&S (in his initial
Affidavit in Opposition to the Order to Show Cause (NYSCEF Doc.
No.25), paragraph 10: “As of today, [June 30, 2020] approximately
75,000 copies have been printed and bound and are ready for
publication, thousands of which have already been shipped…In addition,
Simon & Schuster has provided, and multiple booksellers have
published, key information concerning the contents of the Book.” Karp
submitted an Amended Affidavit sworn to July 2, 2020 (NYSCEF Doc. No.
81) wherein he specifically states that, “…over 35,000 of which have
already been shipped.”, referring to copies of the Book.

Currently, there is pending an Order to Show Cause by which S&S seeks
to file Karp’s Second Amended Affidavit (NYSCEF Doc. No. 132) sworn to
July 8, 2020which states at paragraph 14 that after the Appellate
Division vacated this Court’s TRO against S&S, “…over 600,000 copies
of the Book had been printed and shipped to retail booksellers large
and small from national chains and online entities to a host of small,
independent booksellers all over the country. In the intervening days,
the Book has been extensively reviewed and commented on in the press,
and excerpts of the book are widely available.”.

There is no doubt that the Book is out in the public eye in
significant quantities and has reached millions of people by the
tremendous attention it has gained by the media. Another “balancing”
test for the Court is between plaintiff and S&S. Comparing the
potential enormous cost and logistical nightmare of stopping the
publication, recalling and removing hundreds of thousands of books
from all types of booksellers, brick and mortar and virtual, libraries
and private citizens, is an insurmountable task at this time. To quote
United States v. Bolton, 2020 WL 3401940 (United States District
Court, District of Columbia) ( Lambeth, J.) “By the looks of it the
horse is not just out of the barn, it is out of the country.”.

Lastly, in the vernacular of First year law students, “Con. Law trumps
Contracts”.

By reason of all the foregoing it is

ORDERED that the Temporary Restraining Order entered against MARY L.
TRUMP as modified by the Appellate Division Decision & Order on
Application (Scheinkman, J.) dated July 1, 2020 is VACATED; and it is
further

ORDERED that the Order to Show Cause of plaintiff ROBERT S. TRUMP,
made pursuant to CPLR 6301 seeking a preliminary injunction enjoining
and restraining MARY L. TRUMP together with her respective members,
officers, employees, servants, agents, representatives and all others
acting on behalf of or in concert with her, from publishing, printing
or distributing, directly or indirectly, any book or any portions
thereof, including but not limited to the book entitled: “Too Much and
Never Enough, How My Family Created the World’s Most DangerousMan”, in
any medium containing any descriptions or accounts of MARY L. TRUMP’s
relationship with ROBERT S. TRUMP, Donald Trump, or Maryanne Trump
Barry, or assisting any other person or entity in such publication,
printing or distribution, or providing such descriptions or accounts
to any other person (other than counsel of record in this case is
DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED that the Order to Show Cause of plaintiff ROBERT S. TRUMP,
made pursuant to CPLR 6301 seeking a preliminary injunction enjoining
and restraining SIMON & SCHUSTER, INC. together with its respective
members, officers, employees, servants, agents, representatives and
all others acting on behalf of or in concert with it, from publishing,
printing or distributing, directly or indirectly, any book or any
portions thereof, including but not limited to the book entitled: “Too
Much and Never Enough, How My Family Created the World’s Most
Dangerous Man”, in any medium containing any descriptions or accounts
of MARY L. TRUMP’s relationship with ROBERT S. TRUMP, Donald Trump, or
Maryanne Trump Barry, or assisting any other person or entity in such
publication, printing or distribution, or providing such descriptions
or accounts to any other person (other than counsel of record in this
case is DENIED.

Any relief not specifically granted herein is denied.

The foregoing constitutes the decision and order of this court.

Dated: July 13, 2020
Poughkeepsie, New York


______________________________
____
HON HAL B. GREENWALD, J.S.C

Pursuant to CPLR Section 5513, an appeal as of right must be taken
within thirty days after service by a party upon the appellant of a
copy of the judgment or order appealed from and written notice of its
entry, except that when the appellant has served a copy of the
judgment"




Charles J. Harder, Esq.
HARDER, LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff ROBERT S. TRUMP
100 Park Avenue, 16th Floor
New York, New York 10017
(212) 799-1400
CHarder@harderLLP.com

William G. Sayegh, Esq.
THE LAW FIRM OF WILLIAM G. SAYEGH, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff ROBERT S. TRUMP
65 Gleneida Avenue
Carmel, New York 10512
(845) 228-4200
wgs@sayeghlaw.com

Theofore J. Boutrous, Jr., Esq.
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER, LLP
Attorneys for Defendant MARY L. TRUMP
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90071
(213) 229-7000
tboutrous@gibsondunn.com

Anne Champion, Esq.
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER, LLP
Attorneys for Defendant MARY L. TRUMP
200 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10166
(212) 351-4000
achampion@gibsondunn.com

Elizabeth A. McNamara, Esq.
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE, LLP
Attorneys for Defendant SIMON & SCHUSTER, INC.
1251 Avenue of the Americas, 21st Floor
New York, New York 10020-1104
(212) 603-6437
lizmcnamara@dwt.com

 

 

Fwd: Methinks Special Crown Prosecutor Sebastien Michaud will likely read this stuff before he gives disclosure to your buddy the malevolent Blogger Chucky Leblanc N'esy Pas Andre Faust?


David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 4:39 PM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 17:00:27 -0700
Subject: Methinks Special Crown Prosecutor Sebastien Michaud will
likely read this stuff before he gives disclosure to your buddy the
malevolent Blogger Chucky Leblanc N'esy Pas Andre Faust?
To: sebastien.michaud@gnb.ca, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre
<andre@jafaust.com>, sallybrooks25 <sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>, law
<law@stevenfoulds.ca>, "macpherson.don"
<macpherson.don@dailygleaner.com>, Mordaith <Mordaith@gmail.com>,
"Stephen.Horsman" <Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca>, "jeff.mockler"
<jeff.mockler@gnb.ca>, "david.alward" <david.alward@gnb.ca>,
"david.akin" <david.akin@sunmedia.ca>, "Robert. Jones"
<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, "nick.moore" <nick.moore@bellmedia.ca>,
"David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "peter.dauphinee"
<peter.dauphinee@gmail.com>, "peter.mackay"
<peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca>, "david.hansen"
<david.hansen@justice.gc.ca>, "paul.looker"
<paul.looker@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, jmacdonell@stewartmckelvey.com
, bdysart
<bdysart@smss.com>, Barbara.Whitenect@gnb.ca, markandcaroline
<markandcaroline@gmail.com>, COCMoncton <COCMoncton@gmail.com>,
dohertylaw@rogers.com, "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
, contact@thelefteye.ca,
Karine Fortin <info@ndp.ca>, "yvon.godin.a1"
<yvon.godin.a1@parl.gc.ca>

Just in case perhaps Chucky should print them and give them to
Sebastien Michaud? After all Chucky stole a bunch of these documents
from me  instead of giving them to the Attorney General Brad Green as
he promised right after I gave him his first computer right in front
of the Legislative Buildings in early June of 2004. So Chucky can't
say he and his Fake Left friends didn't know all about my concerns
with the Attorney Generals and their mindlesss minions for over twn
long years now. Correct David Coon and Davey Baby Alward?

Furthermore Chucky's faint hearted lawyer friends such as Harry
Doherty, Steven Foulds, Peter Dauphinee and even the wannabe lawyers
Vaughn Barnett and Mikey Archibald must at least admit that  the best
defense is a smashing offense EH Petey Baby MacKay and John MacDonell?

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369

http://oldmaison.blogspot.ca/2007_10_11_archive.html

Thursday, October 11, 2007WHAT DOES THE FUTURE HOLD FOR THE CHILDREN
WITH AUTISM???

Adult Autism Care in New Brunswick

Saturday October 13 at 1 pm at the Crowne Plaza Fredericton

Saturday October 13 at 1 pm at the Crowne Plaza in Fredericton the
Autism Society New Brunswick will be discussing autistic youth and
adult residential care and treatment. There is no admission fee and
the meeting is open to any members of the public interested in autism
and improving the quality of life of autistic persons in New
Brunswick.

The featured speaker will be Autism Society New Brunswick board member
Harold Doherty. Guests will include representatives of the provincial
Departments of Health and Family Services and Fredericton MP Andy
Scott.

For More Information call Harold Doherty at 472-2778 (H) or
454-8400(O) or contact by email at dohertylaw@rogers.com


https://ballastexistenz.wordpress.com/2007/02/18/what-harold-doherty-apparently-wont-print/

https://lefteyex.wordpress.com/2015/01/08/court-date-set-for-blogger-charles-leblanc-without-bloggers-knowledge/

Court date set for Blogger Charles Leblanc without Blogger’s knowledge
Posted on January 8, 2015 by lefteyex

By André Faust

In an unprecedented move by law enforcement, Social Activist Charles
Leblanc was given a court date to enter a plea on and assault charge
without receiving a notice to appear. This information was reported by
Irving’s Canada East court reporter Don Macpherson, Macpherson writes;
Blogger to appear in court on summary assault charge on January 19,
2015.

What is extremely bizarre is Charles LeBlanc was never given a notice
to appear from the police or any court officials yet a court date has
been scheduled. I spoke with Charles and as of 8:00 pm on January 7th
2015 Charles hasn’t received any documentation from the courts or the
police requiring him to appear on January the 19th. This is quite
unusual, even for a trivial offense such as riding a bicycle without a
safety helmet the enforcement officer issues a notice/promise to
appear which is contained in the ticket and if the person does a no
show than  a warrant for their arrest will be issued.

In Macpherson’s article published on January 6th in the Daily Gleaner,
Macpherson make no reference to who is laying the charge, so it is not
known whether it’s the Miramichi Police Force or the crown who filed
the charge against Leblanc, because Macpherson has not mention who
laid the charge, one can’t rule out that the story may be a
fabrication.

If the story is accurate the implication is that a person can be given
a court date to answer to the charge without their knowledge. Common
sense tells that the likely hood of non-appearance is pretty high if
they have not been formally given notice to appear in court. What
happens,  are they arrested and detained for failing to appear?   This
would appear to be contrary to the intent of our charter of rights,
which is pretty scary stuff when you consider that people can be
arrested and put in jail because they failed to attend their court
date because haven’t been given an appearance notice.

Once this issue is resolved, either for or against Blogger Charles,
the public should be told how much it cost to get this low level
offense into court, and in addition a comparative cost this action
with other summary assaults that the courts have heard over the years.

The onus is on the crown to prove that Charles is guilty beyond a
reasonable doubt, if the crown fails, and Charles is found guilty,
then one can only conclude that the courts found him guilty to justify
the high cost of bringing Charles to trial.

http://charlesotherpersonalitie.blogspot.ca/2015/01/special-crown-prosecutor-sebastien.html

 Wednesday, 14 January 2015
Special Crown Prosecutor Sebastien Michaud will give Disclosure to
Blogger in the morning!!!

Took long enough....sighhhhhh

Then we will know who is behind these false accusations....lets not
forget that someone from the Crown Prosecutor Office accuse me of
exploiting kids for Sex exactly three years ago Monday!!!

I never went against the Crown prosecutor as I did with the Public
Safety Minister but something is VERY odd in this charge.

I might add that I don't have the rights to a Lawyer....

One thing is certain...the issue of the Fredericton Police Force will
be debated during the trial. Maybe we finally can get some answers
because the drunken Lunatic Poet Andrew Spencer confronted me and
accuse me to be a Pedophile.

Truly stay tuned.....
Posted by Charles Leblanc at 4:02 pm

Sébastien A. Michaud
Called to the bar: 1995 (NB)
Public Prosecution's Office
230-121 rue de l'Eglise
PO Box 5001, Stn. Main
Edmundston, New Brunswick E3V 3L3
Phone: 506-735-2027
Fax: 506-735-2064
Email: sebastien.michaud@gnb.ca



From: monika_schaefer@hotmail.com
To: elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca
Subject: embracing truth
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014

Dear Elizabeth,

First I would like to thank you again for making the principled
decision to table the ReThink911 petition on behalf of the many
citizens who are clamouring for truth and clarity in unraveling the
staggering events of September 11th, 2001.

I am writing now with my fervent plea for you to embrace 9/11 truth
and not distance yourself from it, for the good of the planet and for
the triumph of light over darkness. This is not a trivial
single-stakeholder issue concerning a remote event.  9/11 is the
Achilles heel of the hidden power that is steering this world into
perpetual war, the so-called “war on terror”.  A grand deception has
taken place and all of our institutions are participating in this
deception, including the mainstream media (MSM) and our government.
This includes every single Member of Parliament, as they have all been
silenced on this matter.

All of our MPs have been rendered impotent while the perpetrators of
the crime of 9/11 continue their game. And it would not matter how
many Green Party MPs would be elected, 1 or 12 or 50 or 250, those MPs
would still not have any significant effect while the “hidden
government” rules. That hidden power is what will silence you and all
the others on what is really going on.

You will gain the support of many citizens in publicly denouncing the
official version of 9/11. It is the MSM that will attack you. Please
understand that the same cabal that brought us 9/11 own and control
the MSM. In the “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” they call
the press the Great Power.

In the 16th century, it was heretical to proclaim that the earth was
round. Giordano Bruno was executed for saying this but today he is
regarded a hero. His execution did not make the earth flat. Today it
is heretical to question the official conspiracy story of 9/11. As
with the flat earth theory, it does not make the prevailing story
true.

The most important question to ask after a crime is “cui bono?”.
Certainly the Muslims worldwide did not benefit from 9/11. One also
needs to ask why and by whom you were attacked for tabling the
petition. If their version was true, they could and would simply prove
it.  A petition asking for clarification of inconsistencies would be
no big deal. Most petitions do not make the news. The fact that you
were attacked for tabling this particular petition raises another red
flag that there is something to hide. I think you understand this.

The non-investigation of what actually happened on 9/11 was
deliberate, and constituted a crime in and of itself. Many obvious
mistakes were made however, and it behoves us to open our eyes. For
example several MSM outlets reported WTC7 to have fallen 20 minutes
before it actually fell. Someone got the timing of the script terribly
wrong. There is also the case of the 5 dancing Israelis, who later
reported on Israeli television that they had been in New York “to
document the event”. This requires foreknowledge. Yet the criminals
belligerently perpetuate the lies.

Elizabeth, as long as we the people cower in silence, as long as we
fear the retributions of speaking the truth about 9/11, they will
maintain their power. Nothing any of us do for other causes, be it
climate change or poverty, will make much difference, because we are
not in control of our affairs. We have become enslaved to the hidden
power, the perpetrators of the crime.

There will come a tipping point for the truth to prevail. Perhaps it
will take someone of your fame and stature to tell the world that the
official story of 9/11 is nothing but a pack of lies. I implore you to
consider your legacy Elizabeth. Please do not come down on the wrong
side of history. History will judge us by which road we traveled when
we were faced with the truth about 9/11. You are extremely
intelligent, and yet you say publicly you do not agree with the
petition. It makes no sense, other than for political expediency. You
have told me your goal is to have 12 Green MPs thereby gaining the
balance of power in a possible minority government after the next
election. If you need to compromise on this truth to achieve that
goal, then of what use will those 12 MPs really be? They will all have
to toe the line of what the hidden power dictates.  And dictate they
will. They already dictate a false narrative about the false flag
terror attack of 9/11. This is the premise for the wars abroad and the
erosion of our democracy at home. The false flag events continue and
the MSM carry on deceiving us.

You have always said you speak truth to power. This is when it really
counts. How we handle 9/11 truth is a powerful litmus test to
demonstrate that the Green Party is not just one of the “grey” parties
(as we like to call the rest of the parties). Embrace the petition for
9/11 truth, and the Greens truly are different than the Greys.

We urgently need to expose the fraud and bring sanity and peace to a
deeply troubled world. This is about preventing WW III. This is about
regaining control over our own destiny, and yes, that includes the
ability to address the environmental issues which threaten our very
future. Let 2015 be the year of light, not darkness.

With deep respect and humility,

Monika Schaefer
Jasper, Alberta



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 16:29:30 -0700
Subject: Attn Anthony J Hall, Meric S. Gertler and of course my
malevolent politcal foes Allan Rock and Diane Davidson
To: hall@uleth.ca, president@utoronto.ca, morgan.russell@utoronto.ca,
president <president@uottawa.ca>, diane.davidson@uottawa.ca,
kathryn.prudhomme@uottawa.ca, radical <radical@radicalpress.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=7048

http://www.president.utoronto.ca/contact

http://directory.uleth.ca/users/hall

Anthony Hall Faculty
Liberal Education Program
Office: A812H (University Hall)
Phone: (403) 329-2638

Email: hall@uleth.ca


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 15:07:20 -0700
Subject: BTW Jean Chretien knew that Mel Hurtig OC got one thing wrong
when he told off Paul Cellucci 12 years ago We were deeply involved in
the War on Iraq Everybody in the know knew it Ask General Walt
Natynczyk or Jean Chretien if you don't believe me
To: jhriddell@sympatico.ca, melhurtig@gmail.com, COCMoncton
<COCMoncton@gmail.com>, "peter.dauphinee" <peter.dauphinee@gmail.com>,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
markandcaroline <markandcaroline@gmail.com>, "Jean.Chretien"
<Jean.Chretien@dentons.com>, michaelharris
<michaelharris@ipolitics.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "peter.mackay"
<peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca>, "pej.prentice" <pej.prentice@gmail.com>,
"paul.vickery" <paul.vickery@justice.gc.ca>, john adams
<john.adams@queensu.ca>, pmilliken@cswan.com, birgittaj@althingi.is,
kevin.vickers@parl.gc.ca, robert.stoney@gnb.ca, "john.logan"
<john.logan@gnb.ca>, "john.green" <john.green@gnb.ca>, sunrayzulu
<sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, james.goodman@forces.gc.ca, "Thomas.Lawson"
<Thomas.Lawson@forces.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

On the subject of War please compare this blog

https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2014/12/08/why-canada-stood-tall/

With this one

http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/06/wrong-again-mr-baconfat-i-was-using.html


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 08:28:51 -0700
Subject: FWD: Re Harpers WAR Tommy Boy Mulcair's answer to Mean Old Me
ain't good enough What say you Jean Chretien, Jean Charest and Trudeau
"the Younger" ?
To: michael.blais@canadianveteransadvocacy.com,
sylvain.chartrand@canadianveteransadvocacy.com, "Thomas.Lawson"
<Thomas.Lawson@forces.gc.ca>, noel.kinsella@sen.parl.gc.ca,
julian.fantino@parl.gc.ca, "Kady.O'Malley" <Kady.O'Malley@cbc.ca>,
Laura.Payton@cbc.ca, joshborenstein@hotmail.ca, celina@liberal.ca,
ccameron@trentu.ca, info@patperkins.ca, TrishMcAuliffe@ndp.ca,
johnturmel@yahoo.com, Mackap <Mackap@parl.gc.ca>, "rob.nicholson.a1"
<rob.nicholson.a1@parl.gc.ca>, stoffp1 <stoffp1@parl.gc.ca>,
sferris@legion.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
, KristieSmith
<KristieSmith@ipolitcs.ca>

Kristie Smith

 613-789-2772
 iPolitics, 17 York Street, Suite 201

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 14:32:23 -0600
Subject: Re Harper's WAR Tommy Boy Mulcair's answer to Mean Old Me
ain't good enough What say you Jean Chretien, Jean Charest and Trudeau
"the Younger" ?
To: "Jean.Chretien" <Jean.Chretien@dentons.com>, jcharest
<jcharest@mccarthy.ca>, BARRY WINTERS <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>,
"greg.weston" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>, "Jacques.Poitras"
<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "david.akin" <david.akin@sunmedia.ca>,
acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
"bob.paulson" <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, mclellana
<mclellana@bennettjones.com>, "pej.prentice" <pej.prentice@gmail.com>,
"jonathan.denis" <jonathan.denis@assembly.ab.ca
>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
, "David Staples (Edm
Journal)" <dstaples@edmontonjournal.com>
, "rod.knecht"
<rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>
, "greg.preston"
<greg.preston@edmontonpolice.ca>, rod loyola <rod.loyola@ualberta.ca>,
Rachel Notley <Rachel.Notley@assembly.ab.ca>
, david eggen
<david.eggen@assembly.ab.ca>, kris wells <kris.wells@ualberta.ca>,
"Marianne.Ryan" <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
"justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
, MulcaT
<MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, Mackap <Mackap@parl.gc.ca>, leader
<leader@greenparty.ca>, glen <glen@glencanning.com>, "vanhorne.ryan"
<vanhorne.ryan@gmail.com>, dexterdyne <dexterdyne@gmail.com>, justmin
<justmin@gov.ns.ca>

BTW Mr Minister of Justice Jonny Boy Denis in case ya didn't know WARS
tend to make a LOT of NOISE and lots of innocent folks get KILLED as
well.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/isis-fight-6-month-maximum-attached-to-canada-s-air-combat-offer-1.2786597

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jonathan Denis QC <Jonathan.Denis@gov.ab.ca>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 21:48:28 +0000
Subject: RE: Here is some VERY serious gossip for the Left Wingers in
Calgary (Tory ineptitude??? Methinks the Herald is no better EH Mr
Minister Denis?)
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I've learned to ignore the noise and keep focused on the task at hand...

Your buddies in the RCMP really should have arrested Mr Baconfat
YESTERDAY EH Jimmy Prentice???

http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/2014/10/little-david-amos-true-history-of-war.html

Friday, October 3, 2014
Little David Amos' "True History Of War" Canadian Airstrikes And
Stupid Justin Trudeau
Canada's and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
behind Amerka's and NATO's skirts.


When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
involved in the initial  planning phases of that operation. There were
significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
of concern for  operational guidance, direction, and forces for
operations after the initial occupation of Iraq.   At the "last
minute" Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its
mind. The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would
not deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO's thinking that it was
less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien's
then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien's
incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
professional, punched well above it's weight, and the PPCLI Battle
Group, is credited with "saving Afghanistan" during the Panjway
campaign of 2006.


What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don't tell you now, is that then
Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
Canadian army to Canada's longest "war" without the advice, consent,
support,  or vote of the Canadian Parliament.

What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
as a "six pac cell" of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
deployment of a Battle Group, nor a "war" make. The Canadian
Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have the
"constitutional authority" to commit the Canadian nation to war. That
has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
"constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
remove "confidence" in The Crown's Government in a "vote of
non-confidence."  That could not happen to the Chretien Government
regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won't happen in this
instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.

President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
attacks in New York; that the Taliban "occupied" and  "failed state"
Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An
ISIS "caliphate," in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear
and present danger to the entire world. This "occupied state," or
"failed state" will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of
terror against not only the "western world," but Arab states
"moderate" or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of
Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an
ISIS "caliphate" no matter how large or small, as it was with the
Taliban and Al Quaeda  "marriage" in Afghanistan.

One of the everlasting "legacies" of the "Trudeau the Elder's
dynasty," was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering
behind the amerkan's nuclear and conventional military shield, at the
same time denigrating, insulting  them, opposing them, and at the same
time self-aggrandizing ourselves as "peace keepers," and progenitors
of "world peace." Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO,
the G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious
behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister
Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully
cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits
are not.

Justin, Trudeau "the younger" is reprising the time "honoured" liberal
mantra,and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the
world to do "the heavy lifting." Justin Trudeau and his "butt buddy"
David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security
and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can
and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing
"humanitarian aid" somewhere,  and call a sitting US president a "war
criminal." This morning Australia announced they too, were sending
tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS "caliphate."

In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
"the elder" and Jean 'the crook" Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing,
marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian
military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern
equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada's F-18s are
antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five
years ago. But alas, there won't be single RCAF fighter jock that
won't  go, or won't want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.

My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin
Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not
served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social
democrats haven't served this country in any way. David Amos, and
other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet
these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to
other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.

Canada must again, now, "do our bit" to guarantee our own security,
and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before
shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now.

Posted by Seren at 12:52 PM


http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/delay-in-iraq-mission-debate-raises-ire-of-tom-mulcair-justin-trudeau-1.2785209

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Thomas Mulcair <Thomas.Mulcair@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 12:27:25 -0600
Subject: Tom on the Issues
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Tom on the Issues

**Dear Friend:**Thanks to everyone who continues to write, call and
email my office. I am always glad to hear from so many engaged and
thoughtful citizens. I'm sorry that I don't have the resources to get
back to each and every one of you, but please know that your feedback
helps guide our work.



I hope you had a chance to relax and recharge over the summer. I was
fortunate to be able to enjoy some down time with my family.  And, I
was thankful to be invited into your communities—from coast to coast
to coast. I met with folks on their doorsteps, at farmers markets,
barbeques and community events. I heard from people like you—folks who
are frustrated with the direction Stephen Harper's Conservatives are
taking Canada—hard-working Canadians who are worried about their
children and grandchildren's job prospects and who are wondering how
they'll ever be able to afford to retire.



**It was clear to me that Canadians are ready for change—and New
Democrats are the change that's ready**.



Canadians told me that they want someone who will stand up for their
family and make sure they don't have to accept less. New Democrats are
doing just that. Day-in-and-day-out we work hard to make things better
for you, and for all Canadians. We've got an optimistic vision for a
more inclusive Canada and we have an experienced, dynamic team that's
ready to lead.



**Canadian families' priorities are our priorities. **



After spending the summer meeting with Canadians and hearing your
concerns, NDP MPs got together at our caucus retreat in Edmonton to
determine our focus for the fall session. We took into account what you
had to say and we made sure that **your**priorities are **our**
priorities. New Democrats are anxious to tackle the big issues in this
fall session of Parliament.

** **

**Here are some of the issues you asked us to work on:**

** **

**Health Care**-we're dedicated to protecting and expanding public
health care. We're making sure that quality health care is there for you
when you need it, regardless of where you live or your ability to pay.

** **

**Childcare**-we'll make sure that all Canadians can access quality,
affordable childcare.

** **

**Jobs**-we're fighting for good, middle class jobs that will help
families succeed. We're pushing for a fairer, greener economy.



What's more, we'll keep plugging away at our campaigns to **strengthen
retirement security**, **save Canada Post's home delivery service**,
**get respect for veterans**, and **make life more affordable**.



We'll continue to put forward substantive proposals that will help
Canadians **right now**—**like********bringing back the federal
minimum wage, progressively bring it up to $15 per hour** and cracking
down on unpaid internships. We're dedicated to raising living standards
for all workers.



And, in our first week of Parliament we had the first of many wins—we
out-maneuvered the Conservatives, simply by showing up for work—and
forced a debate on missing and murdered aboriginal women in Canada.
**You can help get justice for aboriginal women**by joining our call for
a full inquiry here**:**
http://activecampaign.ndp.ca/lt.php?c=297&m=379&nl=34&s=d891b119bac0b215a1b17c4ea3b869c9&lid=2071&l=-http--petition.ndp.ca/end-violence-against-women
(http://activecampaign.ndp.ca/lt.php?c=297&m=379&nl=34&s=d891b119bac0b215a1b17c4ea3b869c9&lid=2071&l=-http--petition.ndp.ca/end-violence-against-women).
I've already
committed to establishing a full public inquiry within the first 100
days of an NDP government.

** **

**But wait, there's more…**



In the week and months to come we'll be sharing more of our proposals
with you.



I hope that you will continue sending your thoughts and comments my way
as we roll out our vision for a better Canada. Together, we can build
the Canada of our dreams!



Thanks for reading and for keeping the conversation going!  Keep
sending your comments to me here: Thomas.Mulcair@parl.gc.ca
(mailto:Thomas.mulcair@parl.gc.ca).



Tom



*****



Great to meet with so many of you this summer!



*****



**On fixing Question Period:**

"Mulcair, whose party just introduced a motion to give the Speaker
authority to demand the reasonable answers from the government, is
forcing the other members of parliament into adopting a more civil, less
deflective tone. If this maintains, Mulcair will be rightfully seen as
the catalyst in a new era of political civil discourse."

(James Di Fiore,
http://activecampaign.ndp.ca/lt.php?c=297&m=379&nl=34&s=d891b119bac0b215a1b17c4ea3b869c9&lid=2072&l=-http--tinyurl.com/nns8tfs
(http://activecampaign.ndp.ca/lt.php?c=297&m=379&nl=34&s=d891b119bac0b215a1b17c4ea3b869c9&lid=2072&l=-http--tinyurl.com/nns8tfs),

**September 30, 2014)**

** **


On 10/2/14, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:

Re The CBC and True History of War Mongers such as Mr Baconfat versus
Harper and now the NDP and the Libranos 12 years apart


> These are the words of Mr Baconfat published by the Edmonton Journal
> 10 years ago when he was a spindoctor for the Libranos .
>
> http://www.ftlcomm.com/ensign/editorials/LTE/thornton/thorntonlist/thornton_200/thornton215/LTEwinters.pdf
>
> Greg Weston of CBC should have noted LONG AGO that that was published
> after the mindless zionist pervert claimed that he had helped the
> Yankees plan the attack on Iraq two years before
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/06/wrong-again-mr-baconfat-i-was-using.html
>
> This is what the Talking Heads on CBC are are saying Today.
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/delay-in-iraq-mission-debate-raises-ire-of-tom-mulcair-justin-trudeau-1.2785209
>
> This is what Harper's Spindoctor said of the Dewar of NDP early this year
>
> http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/2014/01/stephen-harpers-victory-lap-ndp-paul.html
>
> This is what Dewar sent to me AFTER the Libranos and the NDP and the
> BLOC FAILED to stop Harper out of the gate
>
> Subject: RE: Portions of wiretap tapes to impeach George W. Bush and
> put a stop Harper's motion tommorrow
> Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 13:49:47 -0400
> From: "Dewar, Paul - M.P." <Dewar.P@parl.gc.ca>
> To: "David Amos" motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
>
> Hi David. My name is James and I have been asked to send this message
> onto you from Paul…
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for informing me of your concerns regarding Canada 's role
> in Afghanistan after February 2007.
>
> The NDP voted against this motion because we believe it is the wrong
> mission for Canada . It does not reflect the peace-making values that
> Canadians want to see our forces undertake on the world stage. This
> forced motion essentially ties our aid and development funds to
> war-making, and we cannot support that.
>
> It is quite clear that Harper's Conservatives aren't interested in due
> diligence. They're interested in dragging us further into a US-style
> combat role and away from our traditional peace keeping role. Much
> like the Liberals before them, the Conservatives have failed to tell
> Canadians:
>
> - What the chain of command and control will be for this mission.
> - What the definition of success will be for our troops.
> - What our exit strategy will be.
>
> Many Canadians have written me wanting answers and it is our duty as
> representatives of our constituents, to get answers before committing
> to any new missions overseas. As any soldier knows, time spent on
> reconnaissance is never wasted.
>
> New Democrats recognize that Canada does have a role in assisting
> Afghanis in rebuilding their country. Afghanistan is the largest
> recipient of Canadian overseas development aid and we fully support
> the continuation of that funding - outside of this mission.
>
> Thank you again for the time and effort you have taken to share your
> thoughts with me, and for bringing your opinion on this matter to my
> attention.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Paul Dewar, MP Ottawa Centre
>
>
> ------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com]
> Sent: May 16, 2006 8:13 PM
> To: Allen, Mike - M.P.; rcastrocalvo@yahoo.com; irislana@hotmail.com;
> Angus, Charlie - M.P.; Atamanenko, Alex - M.P.; Bell, Catherine -
> M.P.; Bevington, Dennis - M.P.; Black, Dawn - M.P.; Blaikie, Bill -
> M.P.; Charlton, Chris - M.P.; Chow, Olivia - M.P.; Christopherson,
> David - M.P.; Comartin, Joe - M.P.; Crowder, Jean - M.P.; Cullen,
> Nathan - M.P.; Davies, Libby - M.P.; Dewar, Paul - M.P.; Julian, Peter
> - M.P.; Marston, Wayne - M.P.; Martin, Pat D. - M.P.; Martin, Tony -
> M.P.; Masse, Brian - M.P.; Mathyssen, Irene - M.P.; Nash, Peggy -
> M.P.; Priddy, Penny - M.P.; Savoie, Denise - M.P.; Siksay, Bill -
> M.P.; Wasylycia-Leis, Judy - M.P.; Emerson, David - M.P.
> Cc: Simms, Scott - M.P.; Russell, Todd - M.P.; Manning, Fabian - M.P.;
> Hearn, Loyola - M.P.; Doyle, Norman - M.P.; Byrne, Gerry - M.P.;
> McGuire, Joe - M.P.; MacAulay, Lawrence - M.P.; D'Amours, Jean-Claude
> - M.P.; Hubbard, Charles - M.P.; Murphy, Brian - M.P.; Thibault,
> Robert - M.P.; Savage, Michael - M.P.; Regan, Geoff - M.P.; Keddy,
> Gerald - M.P.; Eyking, Mark - M.P.; Cuzner, Rodger - M.P.; Brison,
> Scott - M.P.
> Subject: Portions of wiretap tapes to impeach George W. Bush and put a
> stop Harper's motion tommorrow
>
>
> Hey
> Before all the Parliamentarians argue and then vote to support
> further Canadian deaths in one of George W. Bush's Wars for Global
> Control for the benefit of his corporate cohorts perhaps, you should
> at least listen to the attachments if you do not wish to bother to
> read what Billy Casey and the Bankers got on May 12th. If I can assist
> in preventing the demise of just one more Canadian warrior in a
> malicious foreign war, all of my work will have been worth it EH?
> If everyone ignores me as usual, I will not be surprised. At
> least I will sleep well with my conscience tonight because I know I
> have done my very best to stop the nonsense since early 2002 long
> before the War in Iraq began. None of you deserve to sleep well at all
> because you all supported Harper's orders to send our people to war
> even before the 39th Parliament sat this year. As far as I am
> concerned the blood of four very honourable soldiers can be found on
> your hands. Shame on all of you for not even bothering to honour our
> dead by lowering the flag on the Peacetower. As long as I have been
> aware and could consider myself a Proad Canadian, I thought we were
> peacekeepers rather than poorly paid hired guns for crooked
> corporations, corrupt politicians and their wicked Yankee bible
> pounding buddies.
> Veritas Vincit
> David
> Raymond Amos
>
>
> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 00:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
> From: "David Amos" <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Jumping Jimmy Flaherty's jump boots versus Crosbie's old
> mukluks in a liberal Senate
> To: Grant.GARNEAU@gnb.ca, Russell_Feingold@feingold.senate.gov,
> duffy@ctv.ca, tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com,
> Governor.Rell@po.state.ct.us, Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us,
> Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us, Kandalaw@mindspring.com,
> kmdickson@comcast.net, trvl@hotmail.com, patrick.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov,
> fbinhct@leo.gov, oldmaison@yahoo.com, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca,
> michael.malley@gnb.ca, EGreenspan@144king.com,
> josie.maguire@dfait-maeci.gc.ca, alicia.mcdonnell@state.ma.us,
> info@pco-bcp.gc.ca, ted.tax@justice.gc.ca, Cotler.I@parl.gc.ca,
> racing.commission@state.ma.us, dwatch@web.net, freeman.c@parl.gc.ca,
> flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, graham.b@parl.gc.ca, arthur.a@parl.gc.ca
> CC: nwnews@cknw.com, davidamos@bsn1.net, BBACHRACH@bowditch.com,
> david.allgood@rbc.com, mackay.p@parl.gc.ca, stronach.b@parl.gc.ca,
> moore.r@parl.gc.ca, thompson.g@parl.gc.ca, toews.v@parl.gc.ca,
> day.s@parl.gc.ca, casey.b@parl.gc.ca, mlevine@goodmans.ca,
> brae@goodmans.ca, steve.moate@utoronto.ca, sarah.mann@rci.rogers.com,
> rep@karenyarbrough.com, dc@thepen.us, paul.neuman@asm.ca.gov,
> info@afterdowningstreet.org, gearpigs@hotmail.com,
> alltrue@nl.rogers.com, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca
>
> Deja Vu Anyone? Anyone?
> That's what John Crosbie wore
>
> tHe mAdd pRoFeSsOr <madd_professor@cox.net> wrote:
> From: "tHe mAdd pRoFeSsOr" <madd_professor@cox.net>
> To: <TruthAGAINSTtradition@yahoogroups.com>,
> <theoneswithoutnames@yahoogroups.com>,
> <HeavensTerrors@yahoogroups.com>,
> <Global_Police_State@yahoogroups.com>,
> "Greenman" <8thDAY@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Get a grip on this?
> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:07:12 -0600
>
>
>
> http://specter.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactInfo.Home
> For those of you who wanna stir the pot, I offer the above link to
> contact regarding this. It is an FBI (illegal?) wiretap you are
> listening to, where it is evident the FBI is lying and covering up
> some black op with ovbious complicity of the FBI itself. Research this
> at the below website..........
>
> http://actionlyme.org/FBI_WIRETAPE_TAPES.htm
>
> The letter I sent Specteor is below. I don't really expect that there
> would be much improvement even if we got rid of bush, (the democrats
> are thick as thieves with the idea of the new world order and betrayal
> of all America once stood for too, but at least it is a stand for the
> truth, and it will make them squirm a little. As well as increase
> their guilt whenever they do face judgement for their actions, which
> all men will answer to our Lord sooner or later anyways after its all
> over.
>
> ------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
>
>
> FEDERAL EXPRESS February 7, 2006
>
> Senator Arlen Specter
> United States Senate
> Committee on the Judiciary
> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
> Washington, DC 20510
>
> Dear Mr. Specter:
>
> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
> raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that
> these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in
> contact with you about this previously.
>
> Very truly yours,
> Barry A. Bachrach
> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>
> ------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
>
>
> This sent to Specteor today.....
>
>
> Could you please inform me of the results of your disposition
> regarding the following matter.
> I am concerned over the information presented by this Mr. David Amos
> fellow regarding illegal wiretaps, and the treachery and deceit
> practiced by the present Administration, all under the guise of
> "Homeland Security" ? Would you please be kind enough to show me where
> David Amos has made false allegations, or if not, then explain to me
> what actions have been taken to remedy this situation. It seems to me
> that if indeed our present Administration is guilty of half of the
> things Mr. Amos presents on his website, then there should have
> already been some action taken by any honest person, by you or your
> collegues to get that lying deciever out of office, along with his
> consort Cheney too? Or if those allegations are false and baseless
> that were made by David Amos, then could you explain that to me as
> well?
> I refer to the matter addressed below...........
>
>>> Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
>>> this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
>>> Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad
>>> Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
>>>
>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
>>>
>>>
>>> The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not
>>> a shy political animal
>>>
>>> Veritas Vincit
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>> 902 800 0369
>>>
>>> Enjoy Mr Weston
>>>
>>> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/news/story/2011/05/15/weston-iraq-invasion-wikileaks.html
>>>
>>>
>>> "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
>>> brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
>>> says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
>>> to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
>>> including a Canadian general.
>>>
>>> That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
>>> who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
>>> U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was
>>> also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
>>> prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
>>>
>>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2010/06/canada-and-united-states.html
>>>
>>> "I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
>>> being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
>>> demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
>>> "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
>>> into the US policy.
>>>
>>> At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
>>> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
>>> in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
>>> report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation.There was
>>> never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
>>> were deployed WMD.
>>>
>>> Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
>>> invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
>>> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
>>> (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
>>> about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
>>> that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
>>> authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
>>>
>>> There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
>>> its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
>>> to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
>>> folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
>>> upon."What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions are
>>> to met before US troop can redeploy?
>>>
>>> Prime Minister Jean Chretien and the PMO were even at the very
>>> preliminary planning stages wary of Canadian involvement in an Iraq
>>> operation....History would prove them correct. The political pressure
>>> being applied on the PMO from the George W Bush administration was
>>> onerous
>>>
>>> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
>>> military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
>>> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
>>> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
>>> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
>>> operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
>>> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
>>> ....not necessarily in that order. "
>>>
>>> You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
>>> Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
>>>
>>> http://www.socom.mil/SOCOMHome/Pages/ContactUSSOCOM.aspx
>


On 1/9/15, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYg9E6vPiyU
>
> http://www.thedreamofcanada.ca/index.html
>
> http://www.rudemacedon.ca/0305/030524-hurtig.html
>
> Mel Hurtig to Paul Cellucci
>
> Date:
> April 4, 2003
> Location:
> University of Victoria
>
>
> Speech on Canada - U.S. Relations --
> Mel Hurtig (780) 488-3832 mhurtig@telusplanet.net
>
>
> I want to say a few words about the ill-mannered, obnoxious, arrogant
> U.S. Ambassador to Canada, Paul Cellucci.
>
> Mr. Cellucci,
> you ask why Canada doesn't support the United States. Why have we let you
> down?
>
> Is not an equally justified question, Mr. Cellucci, why have you not
> supported Canada? Why have you turned your back on us? Why have you
> and your country proceeded in a reckless, arrogant manner which is
> 100% guaranteed to substantially increase terrorism and volatility
> around the world, is guaranteed to destabilize Egypt, Saudi Arabia,
> Jordan, Iran, Pakistan (with its nuclear weapons), Turkey, Indonesia,
> the Philippines, Sudan, Yemen and many other countries?
>
> Why have you launched into this foolhardy aggression that will cause
> hundreds of millions of Muslims to hate and despise Westerners for
> generations into the future, with potentially cataclysmic results, for
> ourselves, for our children and for our grandchildren?
>
> Mr. Cellucci,
> you ask why Canada doesn't support the United States in your
> aggressive, pre-emptive militarism.
>
> Let me give you just a few of the reasons:
>
> First, we are opposed to war when we believe there are viable
> alternatives to war.
>
> Scores of countries, Canada included, made it clear that they believed
> that more weapons inspectors and more time would determine whether or
> not Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.
>
> We also believed that unless they were invaded, there was no
> probability of Iraq launching attacks beyond its border.
>
> We also believed that there was no evidence of cooperation between two
> natural opponents, Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden.
>
> We also believed that your war would kill and injure thousands of
> innocents.
>
> We also believed that we should not break with clear, long-established
> international lawŠ. international law which is the fundamental basis
> of the United Nations.
>
> Unlike your country, Mr. Cellucci, Canada has always been a strong
> supporter of the United Nations.
>
> Perhaps, Mr. Cellucci, you should look in a mirror and ask why it is
> that BOTH your NAFTA partners fought off heavy pressure from the White
> House and your State Department to join your ill-advised war. After
> all, didn't Mr. Bush once say that the U.S. has no greater friend than
> Mexico?
>
> Where is it mandated that if your neighbour chooses to go off into a
> potentially catastrophic war, you must go too, even if we strongly
> disagree with your reasons and your logic, and if we regard your
> evidence for the necessity of war with the greatest skepticism?
>
> Mr. Cellucci, the war your country has launched is the very type of
> war that was so harshly condemned by the Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
>
> How is your attack on Baghdad different from the terrible day of
> infamy that Franklin Delano Roosevelt spoke of after Japan's attack on
> Pearl Harbour, December 7th, 1941? Today, just as we were in the case
> of the Vietnam War, Canada is on the right side of history in relation
> to the war on Iraq.
>
> Were also on the side of morality, justice and well-established,
> principled international law.
>
> And were also on the side of innocent Iraqi men, women and children,
> not to mention the young British and American men and women who have
> been and will be killed both during the war, and for many years AFTER
> the war is over in the Balkans - like quagmire of ethnic war lords,
> bigotry and hatred and in the inevitable civil war that will result
> from the debris of Americas so-called and almost humorous, if it
> wasn't so deadly - coalition of the willing.
>
> You know, bullied and bribed countries like Cameroon, the Marshall
> Island, Angola, Guinea, Ethiopia, El Salvador and Eritrea.
>
> Several times in your inappropriate, offensive, threatening speech,
> Mr. Cellucci, you referred to Canadians as part of our family.
>
> Mr. Cellucci, this might come as a surprise for you, but we are NOT
> part of your family and we have no desire to be part of your family.
> In a public opinion poll for Maclean's magazine, Canadians were asked
> how they would describe our relations with the U.S. Only one in three
> said like family or best friends. 65% said cordial but distant or
> openly hostile. In another Maclean's poll, 72% of Canadians said that
> they did not want to move closer to the U.S. And, more recently, only
> 8% said they thought Canada should become more like the U.SŠ Five
> times as many opted for less like the U.S.
>
> Mr. Cellucci, some of these poll results were from polls taken soon
> after September 11th, when world-wide sympathy and support for your
> country was impressive and enthusiastic. Shouldn't you be asking
> yourself how you and Mr. Bush and Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney have
> managed to squander so much popular support from around the world in
> so short a time?
>
> Mr. Cellucci, you say that the United States would be there for Canada
> and that Americans are disappointed and upset that Canada is not
> supporting the U.S. now.
>
> Please tell me, exactly, where was the United Sates when from 1914 to
> 1917 tens of thousands of young Canadian men were left dead in the
> muddy trenches of Europe fighting off the Germans?
>
> And, where was the United Sates from 1939 to late 1941, when Germany
> was overrunning Europe and the Luftwaffe and the rockets were bombing
> England and killing tens of thousands of men, women and children
> during the blitz and the Germans were beginning their roundup of
> millions of Jews who would be slaughtered in the Nazi concentration
> camps?
>
> How is it that even though you knew exactly what was happening, your
> country sat back in the face of so much evil and agony, and waited
> until the Japanese attacked you before you finally, reluctantly, got
> involved in the war against the brutal Nazis?
>
> Mr. Cellucci, Id like to hear your answer to that question.
>
> And, by the way, thank you for being there for us when your country
> invaded us three times, the only country to ever invade Canada.
>
> And, please don't ever lecture us again about going to war. We left
> 45,000 Canadians in European graves during our defence of liberty and
> democracy in the Second World War, while for much of the war your
> isolationists refused to get involved.
>
> Mr. Cellucci, lets be clear. Canadians do not approve of your bad
> manners, your grossly undiplomatic behaviour, your lecturing us about
> defence spending, your warnings about the possible linkage of our
> opposition to war with your trade policies.
>
> Best be careful. If you want to advocate linkage, Canadians may want
> to consider imposing a 27% tariff on our exports of oil, natural gas
> and electricity to the United States as a reasonable quid pro quo for
> your egregious softwood lumber duties. After all, you do believe in
> reciprocity, don't you?
>
> And, don't for a moment consider it a meaningful warning for you to
> suggest that Mr. Bush might not want to come to Canada for his
> official state visit next month.
>
> Canadians well remember the disastrous results for Canadian
> sovereignty when Ronald Reagan visited the obsequious Brian Mulroney
> in Quebec City in 1985.
>
> Moreover, we all know why Mr. Bush was or is planning to come to
> Ottawa. There was only one reason. Not to patch up relations between
> the two countries, but rather to get your hands on even more of
> Canada's oil, natural gas and electricity. Best mind your manners, Mr.
> Cellucci, or the Canadian government might just possibly finally wake
> up to the fact that Mexico, your other NAFTA partner, firmly refused
> to sign the ridiculous NAFTA energy and resource-sharing agreement
> that some of our inept trade negotiators somehow managed to agree to.
>
> Perhaps the Canadian government will realize that we haven't replaced
> our declining natural gas reserves since 1982. That our major Western
> sedimentary basin pools are depleting at the rate of 20% a year, that
> new replacement reserves are proving to be much more expensive to
> locate, are smaller in size and deplete more rapidly.
>
> Mind your manners Mr. Cellucci, or perhaps Canada will have to walk
> away from the foolish NAFTA clauses that mean we must continue selling
> you 62% of our oil and natural gas, even if we Canadians begin to run
> short ourselves.
>
> Mr. Cellucci, you were greatly upset that Cabinet Minister Herb
> Dhaliwal made totally inappropriate remarks by suggesting that George
> W. Bush was a failed statesman.
>
> My, my, my. How terribly offensive can one be? How does failed
> statesman compare with Richard Nixon calling Prime Minister Pierre
> Trudeau an asshole, or John F. Kennedy calling Prime Minister John
> Diefenbaker a son of a bitch and a prick, or Lyndon Johnson grabbing
> Lester Pearson by the collar and shouting you pissed on my rug when
> Pearson suggested a pause in the U.S. bombing of North Vietnam and the
> slaughter of hundreds of thousands of civilians in the bombing.
>
> It seems to me that being called a failed statesman is not only a mild
> criticism by comparison, but it is an accurate criticism.
>
> George W. Bush is no moron. Few Canadians regard Americans as
> bastards. Most Canadians like most Americans.
>
> But, not since the days of Richard Nixon and the Vietnam War has there
> been so much anti-Americanism in the world. The U.S. has antagonized
> not only the Muslim world, but long-time allies as well. It has walked
> away from, worked against or failed to support a long list of
> international agreements supported by Canada and the overwhelming
> majority of countries - the Land Mines Treaty, the Nuclear Test Ban
> Treaty, the agreement to provide lower cost drugs to developing
> countries battling AIDS and other diseases, the International Criminal
> Court, the U.N. protocol on Developing, Producing or Stockpiling
> Biological or Toxic Weapons, the Small Arms Treaty, the United Nations
> Convention on the Rights of the Child (supported by 191 countries, but
> not the U.S. or Somalia!).
>
> While it is true that in recent months anti-Americanism in Canada has
> been increasing, and has increased since the invasion of Iraq and your
> ill-considered remarks, most of the antipathy is directed not at
> average Americans, but at George W. Bush and the arrogant, aggressive
> men and women who surround him as key advisors, the repugnant Donald
> Rumsfeld, the selfishly-motivated Dick Cheney, Karl Rowe and Paul
> Wolfowitz and other American hyper hawks who apparently place little
> value on human lives and have little appreciation for the value of
> patient international diplomacy.
>
> Mr. Cellucci, Canadians are not impressed by your campaign of
> intimidation, by threats re the border, by proposed American boycotts
> of Canadian products.
>
> Perhaps you would much better serve your country if you reminded your
> fellow citizens that millions of American jobs depend on your exports
> to Canada, that as every year goes by you will become increasingly
> dependent on imports of Canadian resources, that for 46 years in a row
> Canada has been the leading export market in the world for U.S. goods
> and services, that your exports to Canada every year are greater than
> your exports to all fifteen European Union countries combined, greater
> than your exports to Japan, the United Kingdom and Germany put
> together and more than to all of Latin America and the Caribbean
> countries combined.
>
> Perhaps, instead of threatening us with economic retaliation for not
> taking part in your military aggression, you would be wise to remind
> Americans that by punishing Canadians you would be harming your best
> customer (not a very bright thing to do), you would be harming the
> profitable American companies that dominate so much of the Canadian
> economy, and you would be encouraging more anti-Americanism in Canada.
>
> Mr. Cellucci, both you and your predecessor Gordon Giffin and Senator
> Hillary Clinton have expressed concerns about the Canada-U.S. border
> and, in Giffins words, skepticism about Canada's reliability on
> security.
>
> Forget for a moment that Canada has already committed close to an
> extra $10 billion to security and defence spending since September
> 11th. Forget too, that Canada has had in place overseas
> document-screening for air travelers well before the United States
> even thought of such precautions. Forget that the September 11th
> terrorists were mostly from your Saudi Arabian friends, and were in
> the U.S. on visas. Forget that at the time of September 11th there
> were some six million illegals living in your country, but do consider
> the following.
>
> There is not one single airport in Canada, not one single flight
> school that would have been dumb enough to agree to train people from
> the Middle East how to fly large passenger jet aircraft - people who
> had no interest in learning how to take off or how to land the
> aircraft - without quickly reporting the highly suspicious students to
> the RCMP and/or to CSIS.
>
> Once again, Mr. Cellucci, look in the mirror instead of warning
> Canadians re security. Increasingly, your CIA, your FBI, your National
> Security Agency, all with huge multi-billion dollar budgets, make the
> term American intelligence seem like a laughable oxymoron.
>
> And, by the way, have you thought about apologizing to Canadians for
> all the Canadians killed on September 11th and for your own
> irresponsible action in appointing your personal driver as head of
> security at Logan Airport in Boston, where two of the ill-fated
> aircraft and their hijackers took off from? Don't you think that you
> owe Canadians an apology?
>
> Shouldn't it be Canadians who need to be concerned about the border,
> given your poor security record and all the violent nutcases your
> gun-ridden society breeds, your murderous snipers, your anthrax
> disseminators, your Timothy McVeighs, your Columbines, your paranoid
> militia, your aggressive history and behaviour?
>
> Please dont threaten us about the border, because if you do, we might
> just decide to look more closely at your own records.
>
> And, don't for a single moment believe that Tom d'Aquino, Allan
> Gotlieb and Brian Mulroney represent majority opinion in Canada. They
> never have, and they certainly don't now.
>
> The best thing you and your fellow Americans can do in the best
> interests of future Canadian - American relations, is to listen
> carefully to every word Mr. d'Aquino, Mr. Gotlieb and Mr. Mulroney
> say, and then remember that Brian Mulroney left office as the least-
> popular prime minister in Canadian history, and that most Canadians do
> not subscribe to the craven policies of Gotlieb and d'Aquino.
>
> Canada, you and Mr. Bush may find it hard to believe, is not yet an
> American colony, and we have no intention of becoming one. You would
> best serve your country by making that clear in Washington.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 16:41:38 -0700
> Subject: Now Blacklocks knows some of what Harper has known for years
> To: tom@blacklocks.ca, holly@blacklocks.ca
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
,
> shutchison@stewartmckelvey.com
>
> http://www.blacklocks.ca/about-us/
>
> http://www.blacklocks.ca/feds-run-news-blacklist-ban-employee-access-to-website/
>
> Monday, January 5, 2015       
> Feds Run News Blacklist, Ban Employee Access To Website
>
> A federal agency banned public employees from accessing news stories
> at Blacklock’s Reporter via government internet servers, documents
> confirm. Confidential records show Shared Services Canada imposed the
> government-wide blackout on website access by hundreds of thousands of
> staff. Files on the blacklisting were obtained through Access To
> Information.
>
> Shared Services Canada offered no explanation. A 218-page file
> detailing the ban is heavily censored and conceals email messages in
> which Shared Services staff discuss the action in messages headed,
> “Block Domain: Blacklocks.ca”.
>
> “This is outrageous conduct,” said Blacklock’s publisher Holly Doan,
> who noted the newsroom first learned of the blacklisting from
> individual subscribers in federal departments who were unable to
> access news content. Shared Services Canada manages telecom services
> for 43 departments.
>
> No reason is given for the blacklisting. Blacklock’s is an accredited
> member of the Parliamentary Press Gallery covering bills, regulations,
> Access to Information and federal courts.
>
> “It’s astonishing to see Canada join the short list of countries that
> forbid public employees from accessing internet news sites,” Doan
> said. “This is not only Orwellian, it appears to breach the
> government’s own guidelines on workplace internet use.”
>
> Cabinet’s official Policy On Acceptable Network & Device Use adopted
> in 2013 permits federal employees to “search for information online”
> and “share links to professional activities and events or interesting
> and relevant articles”. The Policy also details “unacceptable use” of
> government computers including access to “hate propaganda”;
> “pornography”; “obscenity”; and “illegal gambling”.
>
> Doan said, “Surely Shared Services Canada can tell the difference
> between Blacklock’s and a jihadist website or crime syndicate”; “No
> rational agency would blacklist an accredited news site in the name of
> security or crime prevention”. Doan noted the Blacklock’s ban appeared
> to be revoked September 9, the same day the publication filed a formal
> request for records from Shared Services Canada.
>
> ‘Way Ahead There, Boss Man’
>
> Documents indicate the government’s central internet provider blocks
> numerous domain sites. Shared Services Canada would not explain how
> many sites it has blacklisted, what their names are, or how many
> others are accredited news sites. “We do not comment on the specifics
> of methods used to protect the Government of Canada’s IT
> infrastructure,” said Marie-Helene Rouillard, a Shared Services
> spokesperson.
>
> Access To Information records show the department’s IT security
> division blocked the website blacklocks.ca from last August 22,
> sending an email alert to numerous agencies including the Department
> of Industry, Correctional Service of Canada, tax department and
> others. “The email went to all contacts we have on record,” Dave
> Tough, a Shared Services security analyst, writes in one August 25
> email; “Way ahead of you there, boss-man.”
>
> Tough rated the alert of “high importance”, and indicated several IT
> staff monitored the news site. Blacklock’s was also cited in an August
> 27 Cyber Brief distributed to telecom staff across all government
> agencies; “Cyber Briefs are publications released by the Government of
> Canada with the goal of preventing widespread incidents,” the memo
> reads. All references to Blacklock’s were lengthy and censored.
>
> Tough did not reply to repeated requests for an interview. “At no time
> did our newsroom pose a security threat to the nation,” said Publisher
> Doan.
>
> Under cabinet’s Policy on workplace computer use, more than 200,000
> federal employees are permitted to “watch online broadcasts of
> work-related content” and “keep up-to-date with news and current
> events”, according to Examples Of Acceptable Use. Other permitted
> activities include “subscribe to web feeds”; “check the weather
> forecast”; “confirm bus schedule information”; “read or contribute to
> online forums”; and “visit social networking sites to connect with
> family and friends”.
>
> Forbidden computer activities include using workplace computers to
> “make public comments about government policies”; “engage in political
> activity”; or “breach the duty of loyalty requirement for public
> servants”.
>
> By Staf
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 10:16:14 -0700
> Subject: Attn Michael Harris Trust that you are wrong about Bill Casey
> and several other things in your UNIFOR speech However you are on the
> right track about Arthur Hamilton Perhaps we should talk ASAP
> To: michaelharris@ipolitics.ca
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> The documents hereto attached as pdf files speak for themselves
>
> Obviously I am this David Amos
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/harper-and-bankers.html
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html
>
> And this is you
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amu-yy5hnFA#t=808
>
> http://www.nationalnewswatch.com/author/mharris/
>
> http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/media-watch/2012/03/radio-talk-show-host-michael-harris-fired-bell-media
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 01:34:33 -0700
> Subject: ATTN CSt Dale Drummond of the RCMP Please study the pdf files
> hereto attached VERY closely May I suggest that you do your job ASAP
> or find a far smarter lawer that Don Scott?
> To: dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "Marianne.Ryan"
> <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
, "Jonathan.Denis"
> <Jonathan.Denis@gov.ab.ca>, "brian.hodgson"
> <brian.hodgson@assembly.ab.ca>
, "tim.turner" <tim.turner@gov.ab.ca>,
> "rod.knecht" <rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>
, sunrayzulu
> <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, "bill.clark" <bill.clark@edmontonpolice.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
, "Don.scott"
> <Don.scott@gov.ab.ca>, DavidYurdiga <DavidYurdiga@gmail.com>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:50:49 -0700
> Subject: ATTNN Eric J. Fygi, Deputy General Counsel My number is 902 800
> 0369
> To: eric.fygi@hq.doe.gov, russ_girling <russ_girling@transcanada.com>
,
> rusun <rusun@un.int>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> Eric J. Fygi, Deputy General Counsel
> 202-586-5284
> 202-286-7583 (fax)
> eric.fygi@hq.doe.gov
>
> http://fortruss.blogspot.it/2014/11/grandmaster-putins-golden-trap.html
>
> Dmitry Kalinichenko for Investcafe.ru
>
> Accusations of the West towards Putin traditionally are based on the
> fact that he worked in the KGB. And therefore he is a cruel and
> immoral person. Putin is blamed for everything. But nobody ever
> accused Putin of lack of intelligence.
>
> Any accusations against this man only emphasize his ability for quick
> analytical thinking and making clear and balanced political and
> economic decisions.
>
> Often Western media compares this ability with the ability of a
> grandmaster, conducting a public chess simul. Recent developments in
> US economy and the West in general allow us to conclude that in this
> part of the assessment of Putin's personality Western media is
> absolutely right.
>
> Despite numerous success reports in the style of Fox News and CNN,
> today, Western economy, led by the United States is in Putin's trap,
> the way out of which no one in the West can see or find. And the more
> the West is trying to escape from this trap, the more stuck it
> becomes.
>
> What is the truly tragic predicament of the West and the United
> States, in which they find themselves? And why all the Western media
> and leading Western economists are silent about this, as a well
> guarded military secret? Let's try to understand the essence of
> current economic events, in the context of the economy, setting aside
> the factors of morality, ethics and geopolitics.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:33:02 -0700
> Subject: The Administrative Conference is committed to promoting
> improved government procedures including fair and effective dispute
> resolution
> To: pverkuil@acus.gov, smcgibbon@acus.gov, "Peter.Edge"
> <Peter.Edge@dhs.gov>, "bob.paulson" <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "Thomas.Lawson" <Thomas.Lawson@forces.gc.ca>,
> Marissa.Secreto@revolution.com
, steve.case@revolution.com,
> tolson@gibsondunn.com, dgray@omm.com, oig <oig@ftc.gov>, oig
> <oig@sec.gov>, "Patrick.Fitzgerald" <Patrick.Fitzgerald@skadden.com>,
> katharine.dickerson@hq.doe.gov
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> http://www.acus.gov/about-administrative-conference-united-states-acus
>
> http://www.acus.gov/directory/chairman
>
> Paul R. Verkuil
>  Email: pverkuil@acus.gov
> Phone: 202.480.2080
>
> http://www.acus.gov/contacts/steven-croley
>
>
> Shawne McGibbon
> General Counsel
> smcgibbon@acus.gov
> 202.480.2088
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Ron Klain <ron.klain@revolution.com>
> Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 16:22:15 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: I just called the Office of Governor Rick
> Scott and got the usual runaround I have gotten since 2004
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I am on a leave of absence to serve in the US Government.  I will NOT
> be reading or responding to emails sent to this account during this
> period.  Please resend your email to Marissa.Secreto@revolution.com
,
> and she will follow-up.
>
>
> http://www.revolution.com/our-team/steve-case
>
> •White House alum moves to D.C. investment firm. Marissa Hopkins
> Secreto worked for President Obama and most recently as senior adviser
> to the Assistant Treasury Secretary for Public Affairs. She will be
> serving as chief of staff to Chairman Steve Case of his investment
> firm, Revolution.
>
> http://www.acus.gov/directory/staff
>
> http://www.acus.gov/contacts/ronald-klain
>
> Ronald A. Klain
> President, Case Holdings
> General Counsel, Revolution LLC
> **Currently on leave of absence from Revolution**
>
> Ron Klain is President of Case Holdings and General Counsel at Revolution
> LLC.
>
> Prior to joining Revolution, Ron was a Partner and National Practice
> Group Chair at O'Melveny & Myers LLP.  In addition to his career in
> law and business, Ron has extensive public service experience, most
> recently as a senior White House aide to President Obama and Chief of
> Staff to Vice President Biden.
>
> Earlier, he served as Chief of Staff or Staff Director for Vice
> President Al Gore, Attorney General Janet Reno, the Senate Democratic
> Leadership Committee, and the Senate Judiciary Committee.  He has
> served as a top debate preparation advisor to Presidents Obama and
> Clinton, as well as Democratic Presidential nominees Al Gore and John
> Kerry.  He gained national notice as General Counsel for the Gore
> Recount Committee in 2000, in recognition of which he was selected as
> one of National Law Journal's "Lawyers of the Year" and portrayed by
> Academy Award winner Kevin Spacey in the HBO film Recount.
>
> Active in a number of civic and non-profit groups, Ron has served as
> Chairman of the Board of the Vice President's Residence Foundation, a
> member of the Board of Visitors of Harvard Law School, and a Board
> Member of the American Constitution Society and the American Progress
> Action Fund.
>
> Ron is a summa cum laude graduate of Georgetown University and holds a
> JD, magna cum laude, from Harvard Law School, where he was an Editor
> of the Harvard Law Review and won the Sears Prize for the highest
> grade average in 1985.  He served as a law clerk to Supreme Court
> Justice Byron White
>
> http://www.acus.gov/directory/council
>
>
> Dr. Steven Croley is General Counsel of the Department of Energy.
>
> Prior to this, he was Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy
> Counsel to the President in the Office of the White House Counsel from
> 2012 to 2014.  Previously, Croley served as Senior Counsel to the
> President in the Office of the White House Counsel from 2011 to 2012
> and Special Assistant to the President for Justice and Regulatory
> Policy at the White House Domestic Policy Council from 2010 to 2011.
>
> http://energy.gov/gc/leadership/contact-us/contacts-office-general-counsel-gc-1
>
>
>
> http://www.acus.gov/contacts/theodore-b-olson
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/06/re-teddy-baby-olson-and-j-russell.html
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 17:27:53 -0300
> Subject: Re Teddy Baby Olson was on Fox News today yapping about
> Presidential enemies list as he represents the crooks in Koch
> Industries??? If anyone should know about such things it is Olson
> after all he assisted Ashcroft and Bush against me
> To: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, Office@tigta.treas.gov, RBauer@perkinscoie.com,
> mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov, "Gilles.Moreau"
> <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
, ron.klain@revolution.com,
> dboies@bsfllp.com, tolson@gibsondunn.com, bginsberg@pattonboggs.com,
> "ed.pilkington" <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>
, news
> <news@thetelegraph.com.au>, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
,
> rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com, gregory.craig@skadden.com,
> Patrick.Fitzgerald@skadden.com
>
> Hey
>
> As Harper sits and bullshits his cohorts in the Council of Foreign
> Relations in the Big Apple today I bet he was listening to what was
> happening
> with Obama and the IRS and Holder and his DOJ minions in Washington.
>
> Hevery body and his dog knows Harper knew about my battles with the US
> Treasury and Justice Depts way back when he was the boss of the
> opposition in Canada's Parliament. Two simple files easily found on
> the Internet cannot be argued.
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/5-years-waiting-on-bank-fraud-payout.html
>
> http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc
>
> FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Office of Chief Counsel, Treasury.
> Inspector General for Tax Administration, (202) 622-4068.
>
> When Teddy bitches about polticians using the IRS to attack their
> enemies because he knows it true because he helped Bush the IRS
> against me
> when Obama was just a State Senator . The proof was when I sent him
> the documents that came along with the letter found on page 13 of this
> old
> file Teddy Baby Olson quit as Solicitor General.
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf
>
> Harper and every body else knows It was no coincidence that I sent the
> lawyers Olson as Solicitior General, Ferguson as the co chair of the
> Federal Reserve Bank, and J Strom Thurmond Jr the youngest US
> Attorney the same pile of documents on April Fools Day 2004.
>
> The sad but terrible truth is that legions of cops, lawyers polticians
> and bureaucrats in Canada and the USA knew about the US Secret Service
> coming to my home after dark on April Fools Day 2003 bearing false
> allegations of a presidential threat and threatening to use their
> implied right to use exta ordinary rendition against me as a non
> citizen less than two weeks after the needless War in Iraq began and
> no WMD were ever found.
>
> You can bet dimes to dollars i called some Yankee Inspector Generals
> (starting with 202 622 4068) and reminded them that I am still alive
> and kicking and reminding the world of their malicious incompetence
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> PS Below you can review some emails I sent you and your Yankee cohorts
> such asTeddy Baby Olson before Obama was reelected EH Harper? In truth
> I would rather settle in confidence with Obama then sue the Hell out
> of the CROWN and the Holy See Trust that the evil old Judge Bastarache
> has known why for a very long time.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 01:04:19 -0700
> Subject: I see no need for me to contact Elon Musk Checkout some of my
> old files Gary
> To: gary@2facetruth.com, jrk@classactionlaw.com
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> You do know I am this guy correct?
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html
>
> QSLS Politics
> By Location  Visit Detail
> Visit 34,543
> Domain Name   (Unknown)
> IP Address   157.166.159.# (Turner Broadcasting System)
> ISP   Turner Broadcasting System
> Location   Continent  :  North America
> Country  :  United States  (Facts)
> State  :  Georgia
> City  :  Atlanta
> Lat/Long  :  33.8353, -84.3927 (Map)
> Language   English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System   Microsoft WinNT
> Browser   Firefox
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:33.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/33.0
> Javascript   version 1.5
> Monitor   Resolution  :  1152 x 720
> Color Depth  :  24 bits
> Time of Visit   Dec 3 2014 8:13:52 pm
> Last Page View   Dec 3 2014 8:13:52 pm
> Visit Length   0 seconds
> Page Views   1
> Referring URL
> Visit Entry Page   http://qslspolitics....-wendy-
olsen-on.html
> Visit Exit Page   http://qslspolitics....-wendy-
olsen-on.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone   UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time   Dec 3 2014 2:13:52 pm
> Visit Number   34,543
>
> QSLS Politics
> By Location  Visit Detail
> Visit 34,542
> Domain Name   (Unknown)
> IP Address   157.166.159.# (Turner Broadcasting System)
> ISP   Turner Broadcasting System
> Location   Continent  :  North America
> Country  :  United States  (Facts)
> State  :  Georgia
> City  :  Atlanta
> Lat/Long  :  33.8353, -84.3927 (Map)
> Language   English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System   Macintosh WinNT
> Browser   Safari 1.3
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like
> Gecko) Chrome/39.0.2171.71 Safari/537.36
> Javascript   version 1.5
> Monitor   Resolution  :  1280 x 1024
> Color Depth  :  24 bits
> Time of Visit   Dec 3 2014 7:14:15 pm
> Last Page View   Dec 3 2014 7:14:15 pm
> Visit Length   0 seconds
> Page Views   1
> Referring URL  https://www.google.com/
> Visit Entry Page   http://qslspolitics....-wendy-
olsen-on.html
> Visit Exit Page   http://qslspolitics....-wendy-
olsen-on.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone   UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time   Dec 3 2014 1:14:15 pm
> Visit Number   34,542
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 10:37:23 -0700
> Subject: Fwd: I am on the phone to CNN right now Re I just called the
> Office of Governor Rick Scott and got the usual runaround I have
> gotten since 2004
> To: Paul.Cappuccio@timewarner.com, apfelbaum@twcable.com, "dean.buzza"
> <dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "jean-pierre.blais"
> <jean-pierre.blais@crtc.gc.ca>
, "mirko.bibic" <mirko.bibic@bell.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> Legal Department
>    Time Warner Cable Inc.
>    290 Harbor Drive
>    Stamford, CT 06902-6732
>    Telephone:   (203) 328-0631
>    Telecopy:   (203) 328-4094
>    Email:   marc.lawrence-
>       apfelbaum@twcable.com
>    Attention:   General Counsel
>
>   -and-
>
>   Time Warner Inc.
>   One Time Warner Center
>   New York, NY 10019
>   Telephone:   (212) 484-7980
>   Telecopy:   (212) 258-3172
>   Email:   Paul.Cappuccio@timewarner.com
>   Attention:   General Counsel
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 10:26:58 -0700
> Subject: Fwd: I am on the phone to CNN right now Re I just called the
> Office of Governor Rick Scott and got the usual runaround I have
> gotten since 2004
> To: Keith.Cocozza@timewarner.com, NewsTips <NewsTips@turner.com>,
> news-tips <news-tips@nytimes.com>, news <news@dailymail.co.uk>,
> Jeff.Bewkes@timewarner.com
> Cc: David Amos <myson333@yahoo.com>, "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, oig <oig@sec.gov>
>
> http://www.timewarner.com/company/management/board-of-directors/jeff-bewkes
>
> http://www.timewarner.com/company/management/board-of-directors/william-p-barr
>
> http://www.timewarner.com/newsroom/press-releases/2013/07/17/time-warner-inc-announces-changes-to-turner-broadcasting
>
> Keith Cocozza
> Time Warner Inc.
> (212) 484-7482
> Keith.Cocozza@timewarner.com
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 09:34:42 -0700
> Subject: I am on the phone to CNN right now Re: I just called the
> Office of Governor Rick Scott and got the usual runaround I have
> gotten since 2004
> To: media@eog.myflorida.com, scottopengov@eog.myflorida.com
, newstips
> <newstips@cnn.com>, RBauer <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, bginsberg
> <bginsberg@pattonboggs.com>, "ron.klain" <ron.klain@revolution.com>,
> tolson <tolson@gibsondunn.com>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "CNN.Viewer.Communications.
Management"
> <CNN.Viewer.Communications.Management@cnn.com>
> Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 16:23:38 +0000
> Subject: From CNN
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Greetings,
> Thank you for taking the time to submit your news tip to CNN. This
> message is your confirmation that we have successfully received it. A
> CNN representative will be in touch with you if we are interested in
> exploring your tip and require additional information. If this is a
> breaking news event and requires immediate attention, please call
> 404.827.1500 and select option 1.
>
> Thanks again for your interest, and keep your browser pointed to CNN |
> The Most Trusted Name in News<http://www.cnn.com/>
>
> CNN Viewer Services
> Email<http://www.cnn.com/feedback> |
> Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/cnn> |
> Twitter<http://twitter.com/teamcnn>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Scott Open Government <scottopengov@eog.myflorida.com>
> Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 11:39:31 -0500
> Subject: Acknowledgement of your email
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Governor Rick Scott's Office of Open Government
> Dear Citizen,
> Thank you for contacting the Governor's Office of Open Government in
> Florida. The Office of Open Government receives a high volume of
> correspondence. Please know that we are making every effort to respond
> to your inquiry or are routing your email to the most appropriate
> division or agency. If you are currently in need of assistance from the
> Governor's Office with a constituent issue unrelated to public records,
> please contact the Office of Citizen Services HERE
> <http://www.flgov.com/contact-gov-scott/email-the-governor/> . If you
> are in need of records from a specific State Agency please see a list of
> contacts HERE <http://www.flgov.com/open-government-contacts-by-agency/
>
> . If you are making a public records request, we will provide an
> estimate if any costs will be associated with processing your request,
> prior to incurring any expense on your behalf. Please review the Cost
> Recovery Policy for the Executive Office of the Governor HERE
> <http://www.flgov.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/2011.7.19-Memorandum-re
> -Cost-Recovery-Policy.pdf> . If you have any questions or concerns,
> contact the Office of Open Government at: (850) 921-6099.
> Sincerely,
> The Office of Open Government
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Ron Klain <ron.klain@revolution.com>
> Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 16:22:15 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: I just called the Office of Governor Rick
> Scott and got the usual runaround I have gotten since 2004
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I am on a leave of absence to serve in the US Government.  I will NOT
> be reading or responding to emails sent to this account during this
> period.  Please resend your email to Marissa.Secreto@revolution.com
,
> and she will follow-up.
>
>
> On 12/3/14, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Office of Governor Rick Scott
>> State of Florida
>> The Capitol
>> 400 S. Monroe St.
>> Tallahassee, FL 32399-0001
>>
>> (850) 488-7146
>>
>> Under Florida law, all correspondence sent to the Governor’s Office,
>> which is not exempt or confidential pursuant to Chapter 119 of the
>> Florida Statutes, is a public record. All public record electronic
>> mail sent through this website will be posted to Project Sunburst at
>> http://www.flgov.com/sunburst , and will be accessible to the public.
>> If you do not want the public record contents of your e-mail or your
>> e-mail address to be published on this website or to be provided to
>> the public in response to a public records request, please do not send
>> electronic mail to this entity.
>>
>> Please be aware that personal information sent in your correspondence,
>> such as home addresses and telephone numbers, may be posted to the
>> Sunburst public records website.
>>
>> Contact:
>> (850) 717-9248
>>
>> scottopengov@eog.myflorida.com
>>
>> The Office of Open Government is charged with providing both the
>> Executive Office of the Governor and each of Florida’s agencies with
>> the guidance and tools to serve Florida with integrity and
>> transparency.
>>
>> On January 4, 2011 Governor Rick Scott issued Executive Order 11-03
>> reestablishing the Office of Open Government.
>>
>> The order states, in part:
>>
>> “The Office (of Open Government) will (1) facilitate Floridians’ right
>> to know and have access to information with which they can hold
>> government accountable, (2) establish and maintain a website providing
>> ready access to accountability information, (3) continue to assure
>> full and expeditious compliance with Florida’s open government public
>> records laws, and (4) provide training to all executive agencies under
>> my purview on transparency and accountability. The Office will also
>> have primary responsibility for ensuring that the Office of the
>> Governor complies with public records requests in an expeditious
>> manner.”
>>
>>
>>
>> Communications Office
>> Contact:
>> 850 / 717-9282
>> 850 / 488-4042 (fax)
>>
>> The Communications Office provides support for the Governor in the
>> dissemination of information regarding his programs and initiatives.
>> The office provides information regarding the Governor’s agenda to
>> radio, print and television journalists, issues press releases,
>> schedules press conferences, and announces appointments to various
>> offices.
>>
>> Media Inquiries – media@eog.myflorida.com
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 08:40:53 -0700
>> Subject: The puck is in your corner now Mr Wudrick
>> To: ideas@atr.org, Aaron Wudrick <awudrick@taxpayer.com>, ppalmater
>> <ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca
>, "Bernard.Valcourt.a1"
>> <Bernard.Valcourt.a1@parl.gc.ca>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
, news957
>> <news957@rogers.com>, "jack.harris.a1" <jack.harris.a1@parl.gc.ca>
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/player/News/Politics/ID/2623445718/
>>
>> http://www.taxpayer.com/news-releases/default-20723
>>
>> http://www.atr.org/
>>
>> Aaron Wudrick, CTF Federal Director w: 1-800-265-0442, c: 613-295-8409
>>
>> Jeff Bowes, CTF Research Director w: 1-800-265-0442
>>
>> John Kartch, Americans for Tax Reform w: 202-785-0266 (Washington, D.C.)
>>
>> Candice Malcolm, CTF Ontario Director c: 416-648-0850 (Toronto)
>>
>> Jordan Bateman, CTF BC Director w: 604-999-3319 (Vancouver)
>>
>> Scott Hennig, CTF VP, Communications w: 780-589-1006 c: 780-953-4484
>> (Edmonton)
>> ideas@atr.org
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 18:16:24 -0700
>> Subject: Email # 3 is Pure Political Hell for the nasty Neo Nazis, the
>> Zionists in the RCMP and of course all their far from ethical
>> journalistic pals in Sun Media etc EH Cpl Levas?
>> To: BC_Hate_Crime_Team@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, andy.campbell@bellmedia.ca,
>> john green <john.green@gnb.ca>, "lucie.dubois"
>> <lucie.dubois@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "luc.labonte" <luc.labonte@gnb.ca>,
>> "Paul.Collister" <Paul.Collister@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>, cward
>> <cward@cameronward.com>, paul <paul@paulfromm.com>, hjk@quesnelbc.com,
>> maryann4peace <maryann4peace@gmail.com>, "jennifer.johnston"
>> <jennifer.johnston@gov.bc.ca>, "JAG.Minister" <JAG.Minister@gov.bc.ca>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 09:21:42 -0700
> Subject: I just called the Office of Governor Rick Scott and got the
> usual runaround I have gotten since 2004
> To: media@eog.myflorida.com, scottopengov@eog.myflorida.com
, newstips
> <newstips@cnn.com>, RBauer <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, bginsberg
> <bginsberg@pattonboggs.com>, "ron.klain" <ron.klain@revolution.com>,
> tolson <tolson@gibsondunn.com>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> Office of Governor Rick Scott
> State of Florida
> The Capitol
> 400 S. Monroe St.
> Tallahassee, FL 32399-0001
>
> (850) 488-7146
>
> Under Florida law, all correspondence sent to the Governor’s Office,
> which is not exempt or confidential pursuant to Chapter 119 of the
> Florida Statutes, is a public record. All public record electronic
> mail sent through this website will be posted to Project Sunburst at
> http://www.flgov.com/sunburst , and will be accessible to the public.
> If you do not want the public record contents of your e-mail or your
> e-mail address to be published on this website or to be provided to
> the public in response to a public records request, please do not send
> electronic mail to this entity.
>
> Please be aware that personal information sent in your correspondence,
> such as home addresses and telephone numbers, may be posted to the
> Sunburst public records website.
>
> Contact:
> (850) 717-9248
>
> scottopengov@eog.myflorida.com
>
> The Office of Open Government is charged with providing both the
> Executive Office of the Governor and each of Florida’s agencies with
> the guidance and tools to serve Florida with integrity and
> transparency.
>
> On January 4, 2011 Governor Rick Scott issued Executive Order 11-03
> reestablishing the Office of Open Government.
>
> The order states, in part:
>
> “The Office (of Open Government) will (1) facilitate Floridians’ right
> to know and have access to information with which they can hold
> government accountable, (2) establish and maintain a website providing
> ready access to accountability information, (3) continue to assure
> full and expeditious compliance with Florida’s open government public
> records laws, and (4) provide training to all executive agencies under
> my purview on transparency and accountability. The Office will also
> have primary responsibility for ensuring that the Office of the
> Governor complies with public records requests in an expeditious
> manner.”
>
>
>
> Communications Office
> Contact:
> 850 / 717-9282
> 850 / 488-4042 (fax)
>
> The Communications Office provides support for the Governor in the
> dissemination of information regarding his programs and initiatives.
> The office provides information regarding the Governor’s agenda to
> radio, print and television journalists, issues press releases,
> schedules press conferences, and announces appointments to various
> offices.
>
> Media Inquiries – media@eog.myflorida.com
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 08:40:53 -0700
> Subject: The puck is in your corner now Mr Wudrick
> To: ideas@atr.org, Aaron Wudrick <awudrick@taxpayer.com>, ppalmater
> <ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca
>, "Bernard.Valcourt.a1"
> <Bernard.Valcourt.a1@parl.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
, news957
> <news957@rogers.com>, "jack.harris.a1" <jack.harris.a1@parl.gc.ca>
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/player/News/Politics/ID/2623445718/
>
> http://www.taxpayer.com/news-releases/default-20723
>
> http://www.atr.org/
>
> Aaron Wudrick, CTF Federal Director w: 1-800-265-0442, c: 613-295-8409
>
> Jeff Bowes, CTF Research Director w: 1-800-265-0442
>
> John Kartch, Americans for Tax Reform w: 202-785-0266 (Washington, D.C.)
>
> Candice Malcolm, CTF Ontario Director c: 416-648-0850 (Toronto)
>
> Jordan Bateman, CTF BC Director w: 604-999-3319 (Vancouver)
>
> Scott Hennig, CTF VP, Communications w: 780-589-1006 c: 780-953-4484
> (Edmonton)
> ideas@atr.org
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 18:16:24 -0700
> Subject: Email # 3 is Pure Political Hell for the nasty Neo Nazis, the
> Zionists in the RCMP and of course all their far from ethical
> journalistic pals in Sun Media etc EH Cpl Levas?
> To: BC_Hate_Crime_Team@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, andy.campbell@bellmedia.ca,
> john green <john.green@gnb.ca>, "lucie.dubois"
> <lucie.dubois@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "luc.labonte" <luc.labonte@gnb.ca>,
> "Paul.Collister" <Paul.Collister@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>, cward
> <cward@cameronward.com>, paul <paul@paulfromm.com>, hjk@quesnelbc.com,
> maryann4peace <maryann4peace@gmail.com>, "jennifer.johnston"
> <jennifer.johnston@gov.bc.ca>, "JAG.Minister" <JAG.Minister@gov.bc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 17:27:06 -0700
> Subject: Attn Pierre-Karl Peladeau Re the Mob, the Libranos (Ezzy's
> word) and their doings in Quebec etc I just called and left you and
> the other wannabe PQ leaders a voicemail from 902 800 0369
> To: Pierre-Karl.Peladeau.STJE@assnat.qc.ca, "ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca"
> <ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca>, "Kory.Teneycke"
> <Kory.Teneycke@sunmedia.ca>, KAwan@mlt.com, radical
> <radical@radicalpress.com>, "t.wilson" <t.wilson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, paul
> <paul@paulfromm.com>, "jennifer.johnston"
> <jennifer.johnston@gov.bc.ca>, info@coalitionavenirquebec.org
,
> sunrayzulu <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, "Amato, Mike #509" <509@yrp.ca>,
> "Randy.McGinnis" <Randy.McGinnis@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>,
> Ruby@rubyshiller.com, cashby@bellnet.ca, frankffrost
> <frankffrost@hotmail.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, sallybrooks25
> <sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>, COCMoncton <COCMoncton@gmail.com>,
> "peter.dauphinee" <peter.dauphinee@gmail.com>, oldmaison
> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"
> <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, Brian Gallant <briangallant@nbliberal.ca>,
> "Davidc.Coon" <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, "mckeen.randy"
> <mckeen.randy@gmail.com>, "randy.mckeen" <randy.mckeen@gnb.ca>,
> "pej.prentice" <pej.prentice@gmail.com>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
, info@pierrecere.org,
> info@alexandrecloutier.net, Alexandre.Cloutier.LSJ@assnat.qc.ca,
> bernard@bernarddrainville.org, Martine.Ouellet.VACHON@assnat.qc.ca,
> Jean-Francois.Lisee.ROSE@assnat.qc.ca
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/pierre-karl-p%C3%A9ladeau-kicks-off-pq-leadership-run-in-st-j%C3%A9r%C3%B4me-1.2855311
>
> Pierre Karl Péladeau kicks off PQ leadership run in St-Jérôme
> PKP gets support from 18 former Parti Québécois MNAs and ministers
> CBC News Posted: Nov 30, 2014 1:28 PM ET|
>
> Pierre Karl Péladeau is kicking off his Parti Québécois leadership
> campaign Sunday afternoon in his riding of St-Jérôme, Que.
>
> Péladeau, also known as PKP, joins five other candidates vying for the
> PQ’s top job.
>
> ■Parti Québécois will have new leader in May 2015
> ■Pierre Karl Péladeau will run for Parti Québécois leadership
> ■Is the PQ ready for the Pierre Karl Peladeau show?
> Péladeau announced his intention to run on Thursday at the University
> of Montreal, after much speculation and back-and-forth on whether he
> would take the leap.
>
> The other candidates who have signed up to run are sitting MNAs
> Alexandre Cloutier, Bernard Drainville, Jean-François Lisée and
> Martine Ouellet, and labour rights activist Pierre Céré.
>
> However, recent polls have put Péladeau far ahead of his opponents.
>
> Also the majority shareholder of major media corporation Québecor,
> Péladeau has a number of notable PQ members on his side, including
> former premier Bernard Landry and 18 former PQ MNAs and ministers.
>
> Péladeau said on Thursday that he wants to be a unifying leader and
> that his focus is on sovereignty for Quebec.
>
> Leadership hopefuls have until Jan. 30 to toss their hats into the ring.
>
> The PQ’s membership will vote for the new leader in May 2015.
>
> Clearly many people in Quebec and everywhere else have been playing
> dumb for years about my concerns about the Mob EH Det Mikey Amato>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Réception Coalition Avenir Québec <info@coalitionavenirquebec.org>
> Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 19:11:43 -0700
> Subject: Nous confirmons la réception de votre message Re: Re The Mob
> Attention Det Mike Amato (905 830 0303 ext 7731) I just called from
> 902 800 0369
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Bonjour,
>
> Nous accusons réception de votre courriel. Soyez assuré que nous
> traiterons votre demande dans les plus brefs délais.
> Merci de votre appui!
>
> L'équipe de la Coalition Avenir Québec
>
>
> Greetings,
>
> We acknowledge receipt of your e-mail. It will be processed as soon as
> possible and a response will follow in due time.
> Thank you for your support!
>
> Coalition Avenir Québec Team
>
> Mr Peladeau need I say that your employee Ezzy Levant and his number
> one fanboy Mr Baconfat  are very evil people who should be sued and
> prosecuted many times over?
>
>
> In a nytshell Sections 300 and 319 of the Canadian Criminal Code must
> be applied evenly by the RCMP against everyone or there is no Justice
> at all.  I have no doubt whatsoever that the lawyer Khurrum R. Awan
> and the very strange Neo Nazi Arty Baby Topham agree with that simple
> statement even though they hate me as much as you nasty people in Fat
> Fred City do N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc?
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-sun-tv-and-standwithezra-zionist.html
>
> http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=1413
>
> http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=1411
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: BARRY WINTERS
> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 6:50 AM
> To: David Amos
> Subject: Will Jeanah do a snuff flic for me?
>
> Blog this cunt fuck!
>
> https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2014/11/30/new-brunswick-the-shit-hole-of-canada/
>
> New Brunswick The Shit Hole Of Canada
> November 30, 2014
>
> The Province of New Brunswick is akin to the distant relation always
> hitting you up for money. The deadbeat always hitting you up for cash
> and assistance he will never payback. New Brunswick is like that
> distant family member that’s entirely uneducated, lazy, and utterly
> without accomplishment. But you put up with the bastard anyway
> because…he’s sorta family. What is it about maritime kanada, that
> breeds bums, semi illiterate cyber-space panhandlers like Charles
> Leblanc. Is it a substandard education system? Is it the generations
> old culture of working only part-time so these parasites can apply for
> UI and “go on paid vacation” for six months.
>
> Hard working, decent, industrious Western Canadians are now wondering
> how much longer we need to subsidize the animals of New Brunswick and
> Eastern Bastard Land. Real Canadians no longer want to pay for the
> government and social programmes of a region of Canada, that has made
> no contribution to Canada
>
> To wit:
>
> By Ezra Levant, QMI Agency
>
> Sunday, May 11, 2014 9:02:46 EDT AM
>
> In his new book Groundswell: The Case for Fracking, Sun News Network’s
> Ezra Levant explores the promise of natural gas that fracking has made
> possible and the controversy that is preventing the exploitation of
> this resource around the world and here in Canada. In this excerpt,
> Levant looks at the situation in New Brunswick where the potential
> benefits of fracking are meeting with protest…
>
> With fracking, New Brunswick could be an economic force.
>
> For more than a century, New Brunswick has been what they call in
> Canada a “have not” province. Less politely put, it’s a province
> dependent on constitutionally mandated “equalization” payments from
> more financially secure provinces just to keep up with the national
> Canadian standard of living.
>
> Even less politely put, New Brunswick is poor. It’s the third-poorest
> province in Canada. Its per-capita GDP is 18% lower than the Canadian
> average. But compared with an energy-producing province, like Alberta
> or Saskatchewan, its GDP per person is more than 40% lower.
>
> New Brunswick governments have tried almost everything to goose
> economic growth in their province. In the 70s, taxpayers shovelled
> subsidies into the Bricklin Motors company, with visions of starting a
> Canadian-made car company. The Bricklin SV-1, designed by the same guy
> who helped create TV’s Batmobile and backed by Malcolm Bricklin, who
> founded Subaru’s American operation, was sleek, with gull-wing doors,
> but it was a huge money-loser.
>
> Bricklin spent $16,000 to make each SV-1 and then sold them to dealers
> for $5,000. Fewer than 3,000 cars were made before Bricklin went out
> of business, taking millions in taxpayer loans with it.
>
> In the 90s, the provincial government had a grand plan to use
> subsidies to lure call-centre operations – for banks, tech companies,
> travel agencies, etc. – to New Brunswick. The province would be the
> call-centre centre of North America. That must have sounded like a
> plausible plan – until India decided to turn itself into the
> call-centre centre of the world.
>
> New Brunswickers might need the work – the province’s 10.5%
> unemployment rate in the first quarter of 2013 was double that of
> oil-rich Alberta’s- but with a legislated minimum wage of $10 an hour,
> they weren’t going to stand much of a chance competing with New Delhi.
>
> The next big idea to hit New Brunswick was natural gas. Not just
> drilling for gas: with 10 million cubic feet of gas produced each day,
> N.B. wasn’t much of a producer. Nearby Nova Scotia was producing 10
> times that, never mind a more energy-rich province like British
> Columbia, which produces 3.5 billion cubic feet a day. New Brunswick
> was going to import gas, from abroad. Liquefied natural gas (LNG).
>
> Canaport, a facility designed to accept liquefied natural gas from
> Qatar and other gas-producing nations and re-gasify it, started
> construction in the mid-2000s. It accepted its first shipment in 2009.
> When Canaport was about to open, it must have been a very hopeful time
> for the province.
>
> Co-owned by Spanish-based Repsol and locally based refining firm
> Irving Oil, Canaport was the first LNG facility to be built on the
> North American east coast in 30 years. By the time it was operational,
> a lot of that hope must have been dissipating. The timing couldn’t
> have been worse.
>
> In July 2008, the U.S. wellhead price for natural gas had hit a record
> high – $10.79 per thousand cubic feet. By June 2009, just 11 months
> later, when that tanker with three billion cubic feet of LNG pulled in
> from Trinidad and Tobago, prices had collapsed by more than
> two-thirds, to $3.38 per thousand cubic feet. And they would never
> again climb anywhere near to where they had been.
>
> Canaport today is running well below capacity – using just 30% of its
> capacity. By early 2013, with gas still trading at around US$4, Repsol
> had decided to bail on the natural gas business and on Canaport. Its
> debt rating was in danger of being downgraded to junk status. But it
> was Canaport – and a 25-year commitment to ship gas into Canada – that
> blocked the deal. Nobody wanted to be saddled with an LNG-import
> facility on the east coast, when northeastern states like New York
> were suddenly awash with a glut of shale gas. Canaport wasn’t alone:
> all LNG import operations in New England were running idle, or at
> least close to it.
>
> New Brunswick, it seems, is stuck with yet one more failure in its
> attempt to become an economic force.
>
> But New Brunswick may finally have something that the world would
> dearly value – not uneconomical sports cars, overpriced call centres,
> or foreign liquefied natural gas imports. It has shale – the thickest
> shale gas reservoir in North America is located in New Brunswick.
>
> Nobody knows yet how much gas is trapped in that thick reservoir; the
> exploration is just beginning. But Frank McKenna, the province’s
> former premier and a former Canadian ambassador to the United States,
> has estimated that developing New Brunswick’s shale-gas industry could
> generate more than $7 billion in royalties and tax revenues for the
> government. For a province with an annual budget just over $7 billion,
> that’s an incredible amount of money. Imagine if California had
> suddenly stumbled on a new industry worth $100 billion – the total of
> its annual state budget.
>
> That’s why the New Brunswick government is taking shale gas very
> seriously. All that potential for shale gas combined with an Atlantic
> seaport – with the potential for exporting LNG to Asia or Europe,
> replacing the now-uneconomic import plan – could feasibly turn New
> Brunswick into a vibrant energy-export hub someday.
>
> In May 2013, the provincial government released a “blueprint” for
> energy exploration in the province. The premier, David Alward, called
> it a “key part of our government’s plan to rebuild New Brunswick’s
> economy and create jobs here at home.”
>
> The blueprint considers how to balance the interests of water
> management, air quality, royalty regimes, workforce development,
> economic development and attracting investment, supply planning, and
> opportunities to get economically challenged First Nations bands
> involved in the energy industry. It has already granted an exploration
> licence to SWN Resources Canada to search 2.5 million acres of the
> province for gas, and SWN has committed to investing a minimum of $47
> million into the project.
>
> Alward is taking an exceedingly careful and gradual approach to
> rolling out shale-gas development. He should. He needs to. New
> Brunswick borders Quebec, where anti-fracking hysteria has reached
> absurd proportions, with the Quebec government imposing a draconian
> moratorium on shale-gas exploration, as we’ve seen. New Brunswick is
> also close to New England, where the American anti-fracking movement
> has managed a firm foothold.
>
> Environmentalist groups have already started working to mobilize
> Indian bands in New Brunswick, exploiting them to hijack aboriginal
> interests just as they have done in western Canada and Quebec.
>
> And they’re stirring up trouble, using fear. In June 2013, members of
> the Elsipogtog Indian Nation band confronted a seismic testing crew
> from SWN Resources, accompanied by protesters claiming to be
> “independent UN observers” (there are no UN observers in Canada).
> After a heated encounter, the demonstrators towed the company’s trucks
> onto the nearby native reserves – essentially stealing millions of
> dollars’ worth of equipment. Later that same month, police arrested
> protesters trying to block SWN trucks from doing testing in the same
> area.
>
> The protests turned even more violent and destructive when protesters
> turned to arson, setting ablaze two of SWN’s seismic rigs. Police had
> to arrest more than 30 people for breaking the law in the onslaught
> against the company and its employees.
>
> This is what New Brunswick is up against: the opportunity to develop
> its economy, finally, in a sustainable and market-oriented way, facing
> resistance from a handful of professional anti-fracking agitators
> using local native groups as their pawns. It won’t be an easy battle –
> the anti-fracking lobby has a lot of resources and support behind
> them, from well beyond New Brunswick.
>
> But New Brunswick has known for too long what it means to be dependent
> on others just to get by. To the province’s credit, it seems, so far,
> determined to overcome the attacks by anti-fracking groups and finally
> build energy security, and a thriving economy, for itself.
>
> Excerpted from Groundswell by Ezra Levant. © 2014 Ezra Levant.
> Reprinted by permission of McClelland & Stewart, a division of Random
> House of Canada Ltd. All rights reserved. END QUOTE
>
> Isn’t it interesting that the animals of New Brunswick are loathe to
> “frack” or develop their own resources in the name of “saving Mother
> Earth. But have NO Problems leeching off provinces that do. New
> Brunswick and maritime kanada are parasitic assholes.
>
>
> http://globalnews.ca/news/1697442/ezra-levant-ordered-to-pay-80000-in-defamation-suit/
>
> Ezra Levant ordered to pay $80,000 in defamation suit
> By Staff The Canadian Press
> Pawel Dwulit/The Canadian Press
>
> TORONTO – An Ontario judge who heard a defamation lawsuit against Sun
> News Network host Ezra Levant ruled Thursday that the controversial
> media personality libelled a Saskatchewan lawyer in a series of blog
> posts the judge said were “motivated by malice.”
>
> Justice Wendy Matheson ordered Levant to pay $80,000 in damages to
> Khurrum Awan and remove “defamatory words” about the man from his
> website within 15 days.
>
> “I find that the defendant’s dominant motive in these blog posts was
> ill-will, and that his repeated failure to take even basic steps to
> check his facts showed a reckless disregard for the truth,” Matheson
> wrote in her decision.
>
> Awan was completing his articling and looking for work as a lawyer
> when the statements were posted online by Levant. Awan was seeking
> $100,000 in damages.
>
> Levant’s posts centred on Awan’s testimony at a British Columbia Human
> Rights Tribunal case about a complaint regarding an article in
> Maclean’s magazine from 2006, titled “The future belongs to Islam.”
>
> Awan was a law student when the article was published and was among a
> group of students who alleged the article was Islamophobic.
>
> The human rights tribunal hearing took place in 2008, before the
> inception of Sun News Network, so the posts were on Levant’s personal
> blog.
>
> Some of blog posts are titled “Awan the liar,” “Awan the liar part
> two” and so forth.
>
> Awan’s lawyer had argued the blog posts included statements labelling
> Awan as a jihadist, an anti-Semite, a liar, a perjuror and alleging
> that he acted in a conflict of interest.
>
> He argued that Levant had caused tremendous damage to his client with
> the posts, which remain online years after they were originally
> published.
>
> Meanwhile, Levant’s lawyer had said his defence was primarily one of
> fair comment.
>
> He had said the blog posts were based upon what Levant observed over
> two days of Awan’s testimony at the human rights tribunal and were
> comments on a matter of public interest.
>
> But Matheson found that at trial, Levant “repeatedly tried to minimize
> his mistakes and his lack of diligence.”
>
> “The defendant makes a general assertion that none of the words
> complained of were defamatory due to the defendant’s reputation,” she
> wrote. “There is, however, ample evidence before me demonstrating
> express malice on the part of the defendant.”
>
> Levant also appeared to have little regard for the facts, Matheson found.
>
> “He did little or no fact-checking regarding the posts complained of,
> either before or after their publication….and with one exception, when
> he learned that he got his facts wrong, he made no corrections,” she
> wrote.
>
> The fact that Levant himself is a lawyer ought to have made him aware
> of the “serious ramifications” of his words on Awan’s reputation,
> Matheson added.
>
> “Yet, at trial, he repeatedly tried to minimize his mistakes and his
> lack of diligence,” she wrote.
>
> Levant, meanwhile, wrote on his website that he is reviewing the
> ruling with his lawyer but plans to appeal “all the way to the Supreme
> Court if necessary.”
>
> He called the ruling a “shocking case of libel chill” and asked
> supporters to help him foot the bill for his appeal, which he
> estimates will cost at least $30,000.
>
> © The Canadian Press, 2014
>
> Comments 6
>
> Andre Salazar · Top Commenter · Works at Sbe Media, Manager:
> Nighthawkz Produtions
> Typical Jew! Always spewing venom at anyone breathing & screaming
> bloody-hell when you say they're wrong about anything! #douchebag
>
> Mark Williamson
> This is the type of lawyer who gives them all a bad name. And now he's
> trying to hide behind the right to free speech? On top of that he
> makes more money then most people in Canada, and still thinks it right
> to ask the public for money to pay his legal fees?
>
> James Ryan · Edmonton, Alberta
> It looks good on this clown. He spews hate and division every chance he
> gets.
>
> Veronique Hibbard · Queen's University
> Why should anybody bail him out? Does he not have enough "supporters"
> among certain interest groups here and in the Middle East?
>
> Rory Lawford · Graphic Designer at Black Gecko Design
> I thought conservatives hated people asking the public for financial
> help... "moochers" wasn't it? "takers"? Something about "accepting
> personal responsibility"?
>
> Shane Fage ·  Top Commenter · University of Calgary
> I absolutely love it. I also love that this big mouth is going to the
> public to bail him out :)
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 15:19:26 -0700
> Subject: Fwd: Email # 3 to the NDP and Dr. Craig S. MacMillan of the RCMP
> To: Randall.Garrison.c1@parl.gc.ca
, "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney.a1@parl.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
> "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, "Paul.Collister"
> <Paul.Collister@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>, "brad.anderson"
> <brad.anderson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
, "craig.callens"
> <craig.callens@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
, frankffrost <frankffrost@hotmail.com>,
> "Geoffrey.McDonald" <Geoffrey.McDonald@gov.bc.ca>, cward
> <cward@cameronward.com>, Tracey Matters <traceymatters@bigpond.com>,
> Whistleblower <Whistleblower@ctv.ca>, gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>,
> oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, law <law@stevenfoulds.ca>,
> "danny.copp" <danny.copp@fredericton.ca>, w5 <w5@ctv.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
,
> craig.macmillan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
, "Laura.Payton" <Laura.Payton@cbc.ca>,
> thopper@nationalpost.com
>
> Need I say that I would like to see Commissioner Paulson's notebooks
> from when he was lowly Cpl in Prince Rupert investigating the Murders
> on Highway 16 in 1999?
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/rcmp-officers-break-rules-on-note-taking-internal-audit-1.2852796
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/03/fwd-yo-bobby-boy-paulson-whereas-many.html
>
> http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/11/16/timeline-paulson-took-on-bikers-and-terrorists/
>
>
> 1995 – 1999: Promoted, now-Corporal Paulson moves to Prince Rupert,
> B.C., to work in the Northwest District’s unsolved homicide unit.
> There, he assists in the investigations of a string of murders of
> young aboriginal women along B.C. Provincial Highway 16, now known as
> the Highway of Tears.
>
>
>
> Need I also say Bullshit to the CBC once again???
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/rcmp-accountability-lauded-amid-fight-to-contain-watchdog-s-report-1.2856127
>
> RCMP accountability lauded amid fight to contain watchdog's report
> Public Service Integrity Commissioner Mario Dion found wrongdoing with
> Ottawa air section of RCMP
> By Laura Payton, CBC News Posted: Dec 01, 2014 12:55 PM ET|
>
> RCMP Commissioner Bob Paulson, right, and Public Safety Minister
> Steven Blaney held a press conference Monday to mark the advent of a
> new accountability regime for the RCMP. (Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)
>
> Public Safety Minister Steven Blaney is applauding increased
> accountability for the RCMP one day before a federal watchdog is to
> release a report the Mounties fought to keep from being made public.
>
> Blaney and RCMP Commissioner Bob Paulson held a press conference
> Monday to announce the new RCMP accountability act, which got
> parliamentary approval in June, 2013, is now in force.
>
> ■RCMP officers break rules on note-taking: internal audit
> ■Government wants integrity czar's probe of alleged RCMP wrongdoing tossed
> out​
> Blaney said the Enhancing Royal Canadian Mounted Police Accountability
> Act "ushers in significant changes to further modernize and transform
> our national police force."
>
> The press conference comes one day before a report into the RCMP's
> conduct is to be tabled in Parliament.
>
> Public Sector Integrity Commissioner Mario Dion says he'll table on
> Tuesday a report about "findings of wrongdoing" following an
> investigation into the Ottawa air section of the RCMP. The RCMP keeps
> a small fleet of aircraft in Ottawa.
>
> It seems the report could be significant: the government went to
> Federal Court to try to prevent Dion from tabling the report. The
> court dismissed the injunction motion.
>
> Report risks undermining confidence in RCMP
> The report was supposed to be tabled the week of Nov. 17, but was
> delayed by the court proceedings.
>
> Paulson told reporters Monday that he couldn't comment on the case,
> but said the RCMP would respect the court's decision.
>
> Blaney said the RCMP already has two organizations to supervise the
> Mounties' actions, the Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for
> the RCMP and the RCMP External Review Committee.
>
> The RCMP had also argued that it was up to Transport Canada to
> investigate the case.
>
> The government's Federal Court application and the integrity
> commissioner's response aren't being released publicly yet, so there
> is little available information about the case. But the judge's
> reasons for denying the injunction are public.
>
> In the decision, Judge Roger T. Hughes says the integrity commissioner
> had information there were irregularities in how the RCMP dealt with
> its aircraft.
>
> The judgment says the RCMP argued there is "real potential of
> undermining public confidence in the RCMP," and of damaging relations
> between the RCMP and its pilots. The RCMP also worried about its
> ability to retain and recruit pilots.
>
> The Mounties also argued the pilots alleged to be part of the
> wrongdoing, even if not named, could be readily identified because
> it's a small community.
>
> RCMP will face embarrassment
> But the judge found that the harm the RCMP fear is speculative, and
> that the possible harm to the pilots constituted harm to a third
> party, which the court cannot consider when the matter before it is
> about the RCMP itself.
>
> "The RCMP will face some embarrassment but that appears to be a
> consequence of what Parliament intended when it passed the [Public
> Servants Disclosure Protection Act] which states in its preamble that
> it is in the public interest to maintain and enhance public confidence
> in the integrity of public servants," Hughes wrote.
>
> The new RCMP accountability act, a press release from Public Safety
> says, updates the Mounties' human resources management. It also:
>
> ■Makes members subject to the code of conduct both on and off-duty, in
> or outside of Canada.
> ■allows misconduct to be addressed faster and at the lowest appropriate
> level.
> ■places greater focus on remedial, corrective and educative solutions
> rather than punishment.
> ■specifically name harrassment as a contravention.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Info <info@ndp.ca>
> Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 20:46:19 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Email # 3 to the NDP
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> *Le français suit*
>
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for sending your inquiry to Canada’s NDP.
>
> We will reply to your email as soon as possible. If you have
> previously left a voicemail message – please be assured your call will
> be addressed. We are working to respond to each message as quickly as
> possible.
>
> Thank you for your patience during this busy – but exciting – time.
>
> Have a nice day,
>
> Canada’s New Democrats
> ______________________________
_________________________
>
> 300-279 Laurier West/Ouest  Ottawa, ON  K1P 5J9
> (TÉL) 866.525.2555 | (TÉLÉC/FAX) 613.230.9950
> ndp.ca | npd.ca
> Cope 225:js
>
>  ------------------------------
----------------------------------------
>
> Bonjour/Bonsoir,
>
> Merci de votre courriel.
>
> Nous répondrons à votre courrier électronique dès que possible. Si
> vous nous avez déjà laissé un message vocal, s'il vous plaît soyez
> assuré que nous vous retournerons l’appel. Nous travaillons afin de
> pouvoir répondre à chaque message vocal et courrier électronique aussi
> vite que possible.
>
> Nous vous remercions de faire preuve de patience au cours de cette
> période occupée mais fort passionnante.
>
> Bonne journée,
>
> Le NPD du Canada
> ______________________________
_________________________
>
> 300-279 Laurier West/Ouest  Ottawa, ON  K1P 5J9
> (TÉL) 866.525.2555 | (TÉLÉC/FAX) 613.230.9950
> ndp.ca | npd.ca
> Cope 225:js
>
>
>
> Need I say I was not surprised that MacMillan and his cohorts would
> not come to the phone on Thursday?
>
> http://o.canada.com/news/politics-and-the-nation/crime-and-justice/rcmp-integrity-appointment-raises-eyebrows
>
> RCMP ‘integrity’ appointment raises eyebrows
>
>
> Dr. Craig S. MacMillan
> Adjudicator
> Called to the bar: 1994 (BC)
> Royal Canadian Mounted Police
> Adjudications Directorate
> 73 Leikin Dr.
> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2
> Phone: 613-843-6400
> Email: craig.macmillan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> "In the court filing, the government argues the integrity
> commissioner's decision — which remains under wraps — should be tossed
> out because the matter is already being dealt with under another,
> unspecified parliamentary provision. (CBC)"
>
> YEA RIGHT IN SECRET WITHIN THE BACKROOMS OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL OFFICE
> OF THAT I HAVE NO DOUBT
>
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/government-wants-integrity-czar-s-probe-of-alleged-rcmp-wrongdoing-tossed-out-1.2852561?cmp=rss
>
> Government wants integrity czar's probe of alleged RCMP wrongdoing tossed
> out
> Details of the purported offence remain a mystery
>
> By Jim Bronskill, The Canadian Press Posted: Nov 27, 2014 2:22 PM ET
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 13:45:52 -0700
> Subject: Email # 3 to the NDP
> To: canadasndp@ndp.ca, stoffp1@parl.gc.ca, Karine Fortin <info@ndp.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 11:55:01 -0700
> Subject: Fwd: Re the RCMP versus Werner Bock and his latest buddy Jessy
> Forsyth
> To: "Paul.Beauchesne" <Paul.Beauchesne@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 15:07:43 -0700
> Subject: Re the RCMP versus Werner Bock and his latest buddy Jessy Forsyth
> To: illtrax@gmail.com, maryann4peace <maryann4peace@gmail.com>,
> illtrax@illtrax.com, "Kevin.leahy" <Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "Claude.Tremblay" <Claude.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "david.alward"
> <david.alward@gnb.ca>, "luc.labonte" <luc.labonte@gnb.ca>,
> "lucie.dubois" <lucie.dubois@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
, oldmaison
> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "peter.dauphinee" <peter.dauphinee@gmail.com>,
> law <law@stevenfoulds.ca>
>
> http://illtrax.com/
>
> Jessy Forsyth
> @illtrax
> (506) 862-8166
> illtrax@illtrax.com
> illtrax.com
> illtrax
>
> https://twitter.com/illtrax
>
>  J. W. Jessy Forsyth
> @illtrax
>
> Creative Profesional [Sound Engineer, 3D Animator, Visual Effects,
> Motion Graphics, Editor, Photographer, Webmaster] Cannabis, Comedy,
> X-Sports, Docs, Politics
> Atlantic Canada
> illtrax.com
> Joined April 2009
>
> https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
>
> David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos 4 minutes ago
> @illtrax @RCMPNB #cbc @RCMP_Nat_Div @CBCNews @bloggercharles We just
> talked about your pal Werner Bock Correct Punk?
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8FRh0rtZtHI&list=UUOfRQIyGvHjBZfqBDUipL1g
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8FRh0rtZtHI&list=UUOfRQIyGvHjBZfqBDUipL1g
>
> Published on Jun 1, 2014
>
> I recently was invited by Werner Bock to record an interview with him
> at his home detailing his ongoing court battle and the events leading
> up to it.
>
> Regardless of ones opinion on Werner's view of the world, remember he
> is an intelligent and hard working human being that has been messed
> with since the 70s. False rumours and wive's tails have been told for
> years around the community and in the media; but for those who know
> Werner, know of a sweet, funny man who cares about his community and
> its future.
>
> Werner is due back in court on June 19th, 2014.
>
> Note: There is minimal editing done and a few temporary audio
> corrections. Werner has amassed a huge paper trail throughout the
> years via his correspondents with all parties involved. This evidence
> will be presented in the final documentary.
>
>     Category
>         Film & Animation
>     License
>         Standard YouTube License
>
> Comment 4
>
> Vee Friend
> 2 weeks ago
>
> I admire you Mr. Werner Bock.  You have soldiered on for so long
> against these ranking criminals in their various departments.
> Thank you for your perseverance and your bravery.  My heart is with you.
>
> ooooooohm
> 3 weeks ago
>
> I hear that this man wrote a book. I WANT TO PURCHASE HIS BOOK. If
> anyone knows where it may be found on the internet, or by way of a
> request through the mail, kindly post that information here. Thank you
> very much.
>
>  ·
> Vee Friend
> 2 weeks ago
>
> It is insulting that a psychiatric assessment was ordered.  They
> brought out the whole bag of dirty tricks.  Disgusting.
>
> illtrax
> 5 months ago
>
> I recently was invited by Werner Bock to record an interview with him
> at his home detailing his ongoing court battle and the events leading
> up to it. 
> Reply
>  ·
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 11:24:41 -0700
> Subject: Attn SUSAN PIERCE, DAVID COON, MARK WIES and Tom MASTON
> To: Susan.Pierce@gnb.ca, Mark.Wies@gnb.ca, Tom.Maston@gnb.ca,
> Murielle.Francoeur@gnb.ca, "victor.boudreau" <victor.boudreau@gnb.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
, David.Coon@gnb.ca,
> "carl.urquhart" <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, "serge.rousselle"
> <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>
>
> SUSAN PIERCE,  (Patient Advocate)
> Psychiatric Patient Advocate Services (Unit)
> 300 Saint Mary's Street
> Fredericton
> P: (506) 444-4446
> Susan.Pierce@gnb.ca
>       
>
> TOM MASTON,  (Deputy Minister)
> Deputy Minister - Executive Management Committee (Deputy Head's Office)
> P: (506) 453-2542
> Tom.Maston@gnb.ca
>
> MURIELLE FRANCOEUR,  (Executive Secretary)
> Deputy Minister - Executive Management Committee (Deputy Head's Office)       
> P: (506) 457-4800
>       
> Murielle.Francoeur@gnb.ca
>       
> 520 King Street
> Fredericton
>
> MARK WIES Executive Director Health
> Org Unit :Policy, Legislation and Intergovernmental Relations (Branch)
> Contact
> Phone : (506) 453-2013
> Fax : (506) 444-5236
> Email : Mark.Wies@gnb.ca
>
>
> HSBC Place
> 520 King Street
> Fredericton, New Brunswick
> E3B 6G3
> Canada
>
> DAVID COON (GP) MLA
> Legislative Assembly
> Org Unit : Fredericton South, Electoral District 40 (Constituency Office )
> Contact
> Phone : (506) 457-6842
> Fax : (506) 453-7154
> Email : David.Coon@gnb.ca
> Old Education Building, East Block
> 710 Queen Street
> Fredericton, New Brunswick
> E3B 1C5
> Canada
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYtvhy9GaQY&list=UUy8EcN1vBqTMe8fjF6mKD6g
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP °J" Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
> CLEARLY THE RCMP/GRC AND THE KPMG PALS DO NOT KNOW
> HOW TO READ LET ALONE COUNT BEANS EH?
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,
> John.Foran@gnb.ca, Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,
> "Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have n
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada and
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 02:50:41 -0700
> Subject: Everybody and his dog and that includes the welfare bum
> Chucky Leblanc knows why Danny Boy Bussieres is pulling the pin now
> that the Libranos are back in N'esy Pas Donald J. Forestell
> To: LEGHR-RH@gnb.ca, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "dan. bussieres"
> <dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>, "danny.copp" <danny.copp@fredericton.ca>,
> "david.alward" <david.alward@gnb.ca>, freemanrobmenard
> <freemanrobmenard@gmail.com>, briangallant10
> <briangallant10@gmail.com>, "dan.murphy" <dan.murphy@nbliberal.ca>,
> "Davidc.Coon" <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, "randy.mckeen"
> <randy.mckeen@gnb.ca>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, COCMoncton
> <COCMoncton@gmail.com>, "peter.dauphinee" <peter.dauphinee@gmail.com>,
> "kevin.vickers" <kevin.vickers@parl.gc.ca>, "Tim.RICHARDSON"
> <Tim.RICHARDSON@gnb.ca>, woodsideb <woodsideb@fredericton.ca>,
> "macpherson.don" <macpherson.don@dailygleaner.com>, "chris.macpherson"
> <chris.macpherson@fredericton.ca>, "keith.ashfield.a1"
> <keith.ashfield.a1@parl.gc.ca>
, "leanne.murray"
> <leanne.murray@mcinnescooper.com>, sallybrooks25
> <sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>, law <law@stevenfoulds.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
, "Wayne.Gallant"
> <Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
, kinsen <kinsen@sen.parl.gc.ca>
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/03/fwd-yo-bussieres-please-explain-term.html
>
> http://charlesotherpersonalitie.blogspot.ca/2014/11/legislative-assembly-of-new-brunswick.html
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 16:56:49 -0700
> Subject: Well I just called and tried to talk to both new mayors
> before you take your oath the CROWN correct?
> To: LeeBrain@gmail.com, brain4mayor@gmail.com, districtofkitimat@kitimat.ca
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JK0080AY1M4
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:06:33 -0700
> Subject: The text of this email and the documents hereto attached
> should at least prove to the Investers in Kinder Morgan, Endbridge and
> TransCanada etc that I am not joking about blowing the whistle on the
> RCMP and their cohorts in the DND
> To: john.buis@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "craig.callens"
> <craig.callens@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
, bill.kaplan@blakes.com,
> Nancy.brooks@blakes.com, gmcdade@ratcliff.com, mayor@burnaby.ca,
> neilchantler@chantlerlaw.ca, cl@martinandassociates.ca,
> jason@gratlandcompany.com, ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca,
> toleniuk@osler.com, bcrcmp@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> rob.vermeulen@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, andrew.marton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> france.belanger@ps-sp.gc.ca, susan.storey@neb-one.gc.ca,
> sbeaudry@pco-bcp.gc.ca, mario.beaulne@tbs-sct.gc.ca,
> kevin.johnson@wd-deo.gc.ca
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
, jbutler
> <jbutler@cppib.ca>, ahamilton <ahamilton@casselsbrock.com>, pm
> <pm@pm.gc.ca>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, Karine Fortin
> <info@ndp.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
,
> "Paul.Collister" <Paul.Collister@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>, "brad.anderson"
> <brad.anderson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>
> http://www.blakes.com/English/WhoWeAre/FindPerson/Pages/Profile.aspx?EmpID=102758
>
> William C. Kaplan Partner
> Called to the bar: 1980 (BC); Q.C.2001 (BC)
> Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
> Ste. 2600, Three Bentall Centre
> PO Box 49314 Stn Bentall Centre
> Vancouver, British Columbia V7X 1L3
> Phone: 604-631-3304
> Fax: 604-631-3309
> Email: bill.kaplan@blakes.com
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/03/fwd-yo-bobby-boy-paulson-whereas-many.html
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jim White <jim_p_white@transcanada.com>
> Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 08:18:16 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Putin and cohorts thought I raised a lot of
> Hell ten years ago and then again last year during the G20 meetting
> last year when Obama and Harper wanted to bomb Syria
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I will be out of the office on business Nov. 17-21; responding to
> email as available.
> We respect your right to choose which electronic messages you receive.
> To stop receiving this message and similar communications from
> TransCanada PipeLines Limited please reply to this message with the
> subject “UNSUBSCRIBE”. This electronic message and any attached
> documents are intended only for the named addressee(s). This
> communication from TransCanada may contain information that is
> privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure and it
> must not be disclosed, copied, forwarded or distributed without
> authorization. If you have received this message in error, please
> notify the sender immediately and delete the original message. Thank
> you. Nous respectons votre droit de choisir quels messages
> électroniques vous désirez recevoir. Pour ne plus recevoir ce message
> et les communications similaires, de la part de TransCanada PipeLines
> Limited, veuillez répondre à ce message en inscrivant dans l’objet «
> SE DÉSINSCRIRE ». Ce message électronique et tous les documents joints
> sont destinés exclusivement au(x) destinataire(s) mentionné(s). Cette
> communication de TransCanada peut contenir des renseignements
> privilégiés, confidentiels ou par ailleurs protégés contre la
> divulgation; ils ne doivent pas être divulgués, copiés, communiqués ou
> distribués sans autorisation. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur,
> veuillez en avertir immédiatement l’expéditeur et détruire le message
> original. Merci
>
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/11/fw-methinks-harper-his-lawyer-hamilton.html
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Hamilton, Arthur" <ahamilton@casselsbrock.com>
> Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 05:20:25 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: yo Mr Perrin I remember the sneaky know it
> all lawyer Amir Attaran covering up things for his boss Allan Rock
> years ago
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your email. I am away from the office until Thursday,
> November 21, at which time I will be pleased to respond to your
> message. If you require immediate assistance, please contact my
> assistant Stella at 416.860.6594 or at sdouboulidis@casselsbrock.com
> Please note that you will receive this auto-reply only once.
> ______________________________
__
> This message, including any attachments, is privileged and may contain
> confidential information intended only for the person(s) named above.
> Any other distribution, copying or disclosure is strictly prohibited.
> Communication by email is not a secure medium and, as part of the
> transmission process, this message may be copied to servers operated
> by third parties while in transit. Unless you advise us to the
> contrary, by accepting communications that may contain your personal
> information from us via email, you are deemed to provide your consent
> to our transmission of the contents of this message in this manner. If
> you are not the intended recipient or have received this message in
> error, please notify us immediately by reply email and permanently
> delete the original transmission from us, including any attachments,
> without making a copy.
> ______________________________
__
>
> From: Pamela Palmater <ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca
>
> Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 05:21:24 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: yo Mr Perrin I remember the sneaky know it
> all lawyer Amir Attaran covering up things for his boss Allan Rock
> years ago
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Kwe /Hello;
>
> Although I am in the office teaching for the Fall Term 2013 I will be
> out of the office regularly working on several major research
> projects.
>
> Due to the extremely high volume of emails, calls, and requests over
> the last few months, there may be some delay before I can get back to
> your request. My apologies for any inconvenience this may cause.
>
> It may be helpful to send a reminder if your matter is urgent and/or
> put the nature of the request in the subject heading.
>
> If you have a media request, please put MEDIA in your subject line and
> I will get back to you as soon as I can.
>
> Thank you/Welal'in
>
> Pam
>
> Dr. Pamela D. Palmater
> Chair in Indigenous Governance
> Ryerson University
>
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/12/enjoy-ya-bastards.html
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 11:07:28 -0700
> Subject: Hey Mike Klassen and Daniel Fontaine trust that many old rich
> white men and even your pals such as Ezzy Levant, Suzanne Anton and
> the RCMP know what I am up to these days
> To: Mike@mikeklassen.net, daniel.fontaine@sunmedia.ca,
> gregor.robertson@vancouver.ca, "JAG.Minister"
> <JAG.Minister@gov.bc.ca>, "suzanne.anton.mla"
> <suzanne.anton.mla@leg.bc.ca>, "ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca"
> <ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca>, lgunter <lgunter@shaw.ca>, "steve.murphy"
> <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
> "joe.oliver.c1" <joe.oliver.c1@parl.gc.ca>, "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney.a1@parl.gc.ca>
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/david-amos-vs-bcs-liberal-premier.html
>
> http://mikeklassen.net/about/
>
> http://vancouver.24hrs.ca/author/daniel-fontaine
>
> http://eedition.vancouver.24hrs.ca/epaper/viewer.aspx
>
> http://citycaucus.com/2012/07/appreciating-the-oil-sands/
>
> Appreciating the oil sands
> Suzanne Anton July 2, 2012
>
> It's interesting what a bad rap the oil sands get
>
> If the countries of the world are buying oil – and they are – then why
> not buy it from Canada?
>
> After all, we are a secure country, with the rule of law and a
> democratic society.
>
> Canada is the world's sixth largest oil producer and has the third
> largest reserves. The countries with the largest reserves besides
> Canada are Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, Iran and Iraq. None are known for
> the quality of their democracies, working conditions or environmental
> responsibility.
>
> Kearl Lake construction camp, about 5000 workers
>
> The oil sands contribute billions of dollars to government services.
> Tens of thousands of people work in well-paid jobs in Fort McMurray.
> Hundreds of thousands of families in every province are supported by a
> family member in a spin-off industry job, keeping the kids in hockey
> and the mortgage paid.
>
> At Fort McMurray, the Cree used bitumen seeping out of the soil along
> the Athabaska River to repair their canoes. In 1790, the explorer
> Alexander Mackenzie was the first to record a description of the oil
> sands.
>
> The oil operations which either mine or drill to extract the oil have
> ramped up dramatically over the last few years. The mines are open pit
> sites, where oil filled soil is shoveled into mighty trucks, processed
> on-site, and then the oil is sent off to market in pipelines. Oil that
> is too deep to mine is recovered by drilling using a process which
> heats the underground oil, and pumps it up to the surface.
>
> Open pit mining
>
> Sites no longer in use are restored back to their natural biology.
>
> The pipeline from Fort McMurray heads south to the markets of the
> world – or at least, the markets of the US, given the limited access
> to world markets. But the very interesting issue of pipelines to the
> west coast is not for this column.
>
> Oil is Canada's biggest export sector at $114 billion last year. As a
> small country we need to be able to trade. People understand that,
> which is why, for example, the export of liquid natural gas is
> well-supported here in BC.
>
> So why, outside Alberta, do the oil sands have trouble getting respect?
>
> Opposition in general comes from two directions – political and
> environmental.
>
> Thomas Mulcair, leader of Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition, disagrees
> with oil sands development, in spite of the tens of thousands of union
> jobs they generate and the equalization payments which pour into
> Quebec — $7.4 billion last year.
>
> Closer to home, the Mayor of Vancouver has stamped his foot and said
> no more tankers, taking a direct swipe at the industry.
>
> The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA) invited
> environmentalist Bill McKibben to address a crowd in Vancouver, and he
> spent an hour telling the audience why Canadian oil is bad. Really?
> Why not Nigerian? Or Iranian?
>
> Pipeline heading south
>
> Greenpeace has a long-standing "tar sands" campaign. Other on-line
> journals and environmental groups take great glee in mocking the
> industry.
>
> It's good that as a society we try to reduce our collective carbon
> footprint. Cities in particular can build so that people walk more,
> consume less energy and reduce their overall greenhouse gas
> production. Vancouver, for example, has actually met the Kyoto target
> for greenhouse gas reduction.
>
> Smart people can develop alternate energy sources, and most of us hope
> that one day a magic bullet will be found. But that day hasn't
> arrived, and even hydro power, that most benign of energy sources, is
> hard to develop in new facilities.
>
> In the meantime, we still drive to work and we fly to Toronto. If
> we're lucky, we holiday in warm places. And let's face it, many of us
> like our flat screen TVs.
>
> We live in an world running on oil, and Canadian oil is as good as it gets.
>
> For the environmental groups, the explanation for disliking the oil
> sands is fairly straightforward. If you can make a point which your
> supporters love and will support with cash, then that's a fruitful
> point for you to be making. There are some who believe that Americans
> are conspiring to keep oil imports cheap by blocking our access to
> other markets, which is possible but difficult to prove.
>
> Even though many of the anti-oil sands campaigns are over the top,
> most of us can agree that environmental oversight is good. We all want
> the oil sands producers to get it right, to restore their sites when
> done, and to mine in a responsible way.
>
> It's the political criticism which is more troubling. Thomas Mulcair's
> strong dislike, Dalton McGuinty's scorn, NDP leader Adrian Dix's
> grumbling and the Mayor of Vancouver's outright non-support all
> demonstrate a lack of leadership and an unwillingness to consider how
> important the oil sands are to Canada.
>
> Politicians need to keep an open mind. They need to spend the time to
> understand the issues and the alternatives. Unthinking criticism is
> poor leadership.
>
> Because, fundamentally, the oil sands are too valuable to our citizens
> and to our country to wish them away.
>
> - post by Suzanne Anton
>
> About the author: Suzanne Anton
> Starting as an activist with youth soccer, Suzanne Anton advocated for
> neighbourhood facilities and programs to help children onto the
> playing fields of the city. With that platform she was elected to the
> Vancouver Park Board in 2002, then elected to Vancouver City Council
> in both 2005 and 2008. She's a passionate advocate for smart land use
> planning and economic development in Metro Vancouver. Suzanne was a
> weekly political commentator on the CBC Radio One Early Edition
> program. In May 2013 Suzanne was elected BC MLA for
> Vancouver-Fraserview, and appointed Minister of Justice and Attorney
> General.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 10:01:19 -0700
> Subject: RE Some of my old records in which the Pivot Legal Society
> and Mayors of Fredericton and Vancouver are mentioned
> To: oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, "Leanne.Fitch"
> <Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>, sallybrooks25 <sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>,
> "leanne.murray" <leanne.murray@mcinnescooper.com>, woodsideb
> <woodsideb@fredericton.ca>, gregor.robertson@vancouver.ca,
> "danny.copp" <danny.copp@fredericton.ca>, "Davidc.Coon"
> <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, "stephen.horsman"
> <stephen.horsman@nbliberal.ca>
, "mckeen.randy"
> <mckeen.randy@gmail.com>, "macpherson.don"
> <macpherson.don@dailygleaner.com>, "chris.macpherson"
> <chris.macpherson@fredericton.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>,
> "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
, kpacey@pivotlegal.com
>
> Katrina Pacey.
> Pivot Legal Society.
> 121 Heatley Avenue.
> Vancouver, BC
> V6A 3E0.
> Phone: 604-255-9700 ext 106.
> Fax: 604-255-1552.
> Email: kpacey@pivotlegal.com.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos
> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:19:12 -0800 (PST)
> Subject: Re the ladies of Fat Fred City Finest and their blogger buddy
> Chucky Leblanc
> To: oldmaison@yahoo.com, treasurer@awle.org, president@awle.org,
> evelyngreene <evelyngreene@live.ca>, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
> David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
> Cc: gregor.robertson@vancouver.ca, brad.Woodside@fredericton.ca,
> Barry.MacKnight@frdericton.ca, Arthur Taylor <brother.chao@gmail.com>,
> occupyfredericton <occupyfredericton@gmail.com>
>
> If anyone should study this email about the corrupt Fredericton Cops
> ASAP its Evelyn Greene
>
> Chucky Baby anyone with half a mind can see that you are a rather
> profound bullshitter.
>
> YOU KNOW EXACTLY WHO THE FITCHS ARE
>
> http://www.inmemoriam.ca/view-announcement-158516-kenneth-fitch.html
>
> How many times have you talked to them over the years?
>
> http://www.cdnpages.ca/bus/Canadian+Security++Cnslnts/Fredericton/NB/2290721/business.aspx
>
> Hell YOU informed the world that Deputy Chief Leanne Fitch had
> introduced herself to you when she and her underlings arrested YOU in
> front of the LEG in 2009 You bragged about this for years  and still
> do to this very day DUHHH????
>
> http://charlesotherpersonality.blogspot.com/2011/01/sgt-andrew-macdonald-from-fredericton.html
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R76kDbxBEBA&feature=player_embedded
>
> What the corrupt cops and I also know is that YOU deleted all your
> blogs in your "old" blog not long after you posted your first part of
> your three part series about your fellow no so happy blogging camper
> and fellow bible pounder Jimmy Baby Oicle. (You do know I saved every
> word YEARS AGO because of what Oicle explained to us all about
> politicians, the looney bin in the DECH and the connections between
> Deputy Chief Leanne Fitch and her brother whose demise you are yapping
> about today..
>
> The attachments showing your deleted work forever prove once again
> that YOU are the liar not EH Frenchy?
>
> http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/2008/02/from-top-of-world-to-scum-of-earth-in.html
>
> http://trialsandtribsofjim.blogspot.com/
>
> http://www.citycaucus.com/2010/05/gregor-robertson-blames-rookie-cop-for-homeless-ticket
>
> The story of James Oickle, a man from New Brunswick who received a
> ticket for pitching a "red tent" provided by Pivot Legal Society on a
> sidewalk next to Vancouver’s provincial court several weeks ago, took
> a strange twist on Tuesday. The VPD had to say "oops" and blame it on
> a rookie cop's inexperience, and are withdrawing the ticket. You can
> read the Vancouver Sun and Province's stories, replete with outraged
> comments from dozens of readers.
>
> You can falsely claim whatever you wish but anyone can see byway of
> what remains of your blogs that you and Jimmy are still buddies and
> the fact that you do not ignore your old blog either because you still
> post in it in now and then. The corrupt cops and I know that even
> though you edited ALL THREE of YOUR blogs heavily over the years for
> your benefit and that of your buddies I save EVERTHING of interest to
> mean old me N'esy Pas Chucky Baby?
>
> http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/2011_12_05_archive.html
>
> http://oldmaison.wordpress.com/
>
> http://charlesotherpersonality.blogspot.com/2009/06/i-showed-up-in-court-and-charges-are.html
>
> Jim Oickle said...
>
> Careful my friend they may scoop you up on some trumped up charge and
> stick a needle in your ass.
> They are dragging it out hoping you will make a mistake. Until you get
> your day in court stay out of confrontation. If you see any of your
> adversaries between now and then while out on your walk abouts just
> smile, take pictures, don't say a word other than a God Bless then go
> home and BLOG until your hearts content. Good luck and congrats on
> today. The idiots should have just let it go. Now they have given you
> fodder for your blog until Christmas. Peace James
> 2:42 AM, June 16, 2009
>
>  Anonymous said...
>
> I would think what Jim Oickle is stating is in some way what thier
> going to try and pull the same kinda game with You,dont play thier
> game get others to do it for you?
> They are hoping you will step out somehow where they can either charge
> you or push you into a corner using the medical establishment? seen
> other cases where they have done similar to Jim over much less,it is
> almost standard operating procedure!
>
> http://charlesotherpersonality.blogspot.com/2010/02/violence-erupts-at-olympics-in.html
> Saturday, February 13, 2010
>
> Violence Erupts at the Olympics in Vancouver!!!
>
> Lots of bloggers taking pictures.....
>
> I noticed more people taking pictures than Police.
>
> Funny!!!
>
> I wonder if jim oickle is there????
>
>
> Posted by Charles LeBlanc at 3:37:00 PM
>
> 1 comments:
>
>  James Oickle said...
>
> I'm here and I had words with these dick heads. I woke up to these
> idiots on my front steps when I was heading to MY GARDEN. Did I say
> DICK HEADS.
>
> All 200 with mask chanting'' These are our streets and were taking
> them back." I walk with the cops and antagonized the little dick
> heads. In the D.T.E.S we don't wear mask. More later. I am being
> kicked out of a coffee shop and its 3 am. Tell all my political
> friends I said HELLO. Did I say DICK HEADS.
> 6:59 AM, February 14, 2010
>
> http://charlesotherpersonality.blogspot.com/2009/09/khj-radio-news-leader-covered-suspended.html
>
> James Oickle said...
>
> Charles: Reread their email and it states their wishes. What don't you
> understand about "I do not want you to publish this email."
> Had you used KHJ approach of "KHJ has learned...." then all would
> focus on THE STORY. Instead focus and comments are about you and your
> method of telling STORY.
> Lets get back to this story, CROOKED COPS and their CHIEF.
>
> http://charlesotherpersonality.blogspot.com/2010/01/big-thank-you-to-all-readers-ho-offered.html
>
> James Oickle said...
>
> If I get some gold at the olympics my friend I will bring you home a
> nice Mac Pro Laptop you can drag around to the Tim's and really piss
> off the whiner.
>
> I must say in the photo of young single Mom shoveling I hope you did
> indeed take over and finish up for her.
>
> Love checking your blog each day. I was gardening in a T-shirt again
> today:)
>
> http://charlesotherpersonality.blogspot.com/2012/02/private-investigator-shawn-fitch-died.html
> Saturday, February 11, 2012
>
> Private Investigator Shawn Fitch died last night at the age of 52!!!
>
> Who was this guy???
>
> Please tell....
>
> Posted by Charles LeBlanc at 7:38:00 PM
>
> 4 comments:
>
>  Anonymous said...
>
> That is Leanne Fitch Brother. Leanne is with the Fredericton Police
> Force. You should know this Charles.
> 10:36 AM, February 12, 2012
>
>  Charles LeBlanc said...
>
> don't know those people...looks like a big family affair...
> 10:40 AM, February 12, 2012
>
>  Anonymous said...
>
> You don't know the Deputy Chief???
>
> Perhaps you should have hired the private investigator to investigate
> your arch enemies the police and learn who they are...
> 11:20 AM, February 12, 2012
>
>  Anonymous said...
>
> Shawn was Sherrie Fitchs' brother.
> 11:58 AM, February 12, 2012
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:44:12 -0700
> Subject: Fwd: Now Christine Melnick knows some of what Joe Anglin already
> knows
> To: DaveCore@caepla.org, "terry.seguin" <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 13:31:51 -0700
> Subject: Now Christine Melnick knows some of what Joe Anglin already knows
> To: christine.melnick@leg.gov.mb.ca, "joe.anglin"
> <joe.anglin@assembly.ab.ca>, pub@sasktel.net, premier
> <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier
> <premier@gov.sk.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2014 02:13:02 -0700
> Subject: Fwd: The documents hereto attached and the text of this email
> should put the lawyer/directors of the "Taxpauer" dudes and their pal
> John Hilton-O'Brien a Founder and Past President of Alberta`s Wildrose
> Party on the same page.
> To: kas@karenselick.com, jhilton-obrien@triviewcapital.com,
> dmh@bht.com, dfildebrandt <dfildebrandt@taxpayer.com>, Rhansen
> <Rhansen@calgarypolice.ca>, pol7163 <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>,
> themayor <themayor@calgary.ca>, "Staples, David (Edm Journal)"
> <dstaples@edmontonjournal.com>
, "Danielle.Smith"
> <Danielle.Smith@assembly.ab.ca
>, Rachel Notley
> <Rachel.Notley@assembly.ab.ca>
, "joe.anglin"
> <joe.anglin@assembly.ab.ca>, "joe.oliver.c1"
> <joe.oliver.c1@parl.gc.ca>, "Biage.Carrese"
> <Biage.Carrese@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
, "Gilles.Moreau"
> <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
,
> rimbey.rockymountainhouse.sundre@assembly.ab.ca,
> david.cournoyer@gmail.com
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
, "Frank.McKenna"
> <Frank.McKenna@td.com>, Mackap <Mackap@parl.gc.ca>,
> shennig@taxpayer.com
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2014 01:44:43 -0700
> Subject: The documents hereto attached and the text of this email John
> Hilton-O'Brien a Founder and Past President of Alberta`s Wildrose
> Party.
> To:
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> From: John Hilton-O'Brien (via Twitter)
> Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2014 7:16 PM
> To: David Raymond Amos
> Subject: John Hilton-O'Brien (@hiltonjohn) mentioned you on Twitter!
>
> John Hilton-O'Brien @hiltonjohn
>  HOB's Choice - Daily News Digest is out! paper.li/hiltonjohn/132
> Stories via @Daorcey @jcmcintyre @DavidRayAmos
>
> http://paper.li/hiltonjohn/1329246776
>
> John Hilton-O'Brien
> Founder and Past President of Alberta`s Wildrose Party.
> Health, Disability Services, and Employment Background.
>
> Editor's note
> This paper uses articles pointed out by people I follow on
> social media.  As I am involved with Alberta's Wildrose Party,
> and live in Calgary's Bowness Community, there is a definite
> bias towards those interests.
>
> As "Hilton-O'Brien" is very long, my last name is usually
> shortened to HOB -- hence the title of this digest.
>
> https://twitter.com/hiltonjohn
>
> John Hilton-O'Brien @hiltonjohn  ·  Nov 7
> The unofficial leader of #Alberta's opposition - @Dfildebrandt - is
> moving on.
> http://fildebrandt.ca/2014/11/moving-on-from-the-canadian-taxpayers-federation/
> #abpoli #wrp
>
> John Hilton-O'Brien @hiltonjohn
> Financier for small businesses, worker with homeless and disabled.
> A founder and Past President of Alberta's Wildrose Party.
>
> Bowness in Calgary, Alberta
> http://johnhob.biz/
> Joined March 2009
>
http://johnhob.biz/
>
> John Hilton-O'Brien, BA, MA
> www.triviewcapital.com.
> #414, 815-1st Street SW
> Calgary, Alberta, T2P 1N3
> W:403-984-6570
> C: 587-229-9318
> F: 403-984-6571
> jhilton-obrien@triviewcapital.com
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/wild-rose-party-takes-off-1.683639
>
> http://www.wildrose.ca/
>
> http://blogs.edmontonjournal.com/2012/04/12/who-are-the-wildrose-an-party-of-old-grudges-or-ready-to-lead-us-into-the-future/
>
> Posted by David Staples
>
> Who are the Wildrose?
> A party of old grudges and ideological purity? Or ready for prime time?
> April 12, 2012. 9:59 am • Section: Edmonton Commons, The Edmonton Commons
>
> The simple, common sense commitment Danielle Smith should make this week…
> Who are the Wildrose? Are they ready for prime time?
>
> Do they have the smarts and experience to lead Alberta into the
> future? Or do they just want to re-fight a bunch of old battles and
> culture wars where they’ve been nursing grudges because their side
> didn’t win or get all it wanted?
>
> Each of us will answer this question in our own way. I’ll be looking
> at any number of issues myself, including the Wildrose stand on the
> conscience rights and on the revisiting the Edmonton airport issue.
>
> But another issue for me, right now,  is the construction of the new
> Royal Alberta Museum.
>
> Now, I know that not everyone loves museums as much as I do. When I go
> to a new city, the major museum is invariably one of the first places
> I visit. I’m a museum nerd.
>
> But all my enthusiasm for museums aside, I’m going to suggest that the
> building of the Royal Alberta Museum in a sane, economic manner is a
> crucial test for the Wildrose.
>
> The good news for the Wildrose …
> The good news is that it’s easy for the Wildrose to pass this test.
> All they have to do is let their common sense rule them and not be
> guided by purist ideology or old scores to settle.
>
> Here’s the issue: Wildrose leader Danielle Smith said last week that a
> new Royal Alberta Museum building would be a “a fantastic new facility
> to have in Edmonton’s downtown.”
>
> But even in the wake of the Wildrose party leader’s praise for this
> project, on Wednesday on Twitter, the past president of the Wildrose,
> John Hilton-O’Brien, a Calgary political insider, lashed out at the
> project, labeling it as “pork” for Edmonton.
>
> Pork is a strong word. To me, in this context, it implies the Royal
> Alberta Museum project has little or no worth, that it’s only being
> done to please Edmontonians, and only being done because PC premiers
> Ed Stelmach and Alison Redford were willing to sell out other
> Albertans in Edmonton’s interest.
>
> Use the federal funding or lose it …
> Such notions about the museum projects are a bit odd, I must say.
>
> The  fact is the old museum is too small. It’s also falling part. It’s
> packed with asbestos and has most of its collection boxed up. There’s
> no viewing areas for Albertans to see many of our most important
> artifacts and treasures. Our top museum is second-rate and failing.
>
> The need to build a new museum has been recognized by three levels of
> government, each of them tight with their dollars, including Stephen
> Harper’s federal Conservatives. Last fall, the feds and the province
> came up with $340 million for the new project.
>
> This federal money comes from a funding package put in place to get
> the economy going during the economic downturn, so there’s some
> strings attached to it.
>
> This is stimulus money. It’s no good spending it a few years from now
> when the economy might heat up. It’s supposed to be spent now.
>
> So that’s why MP Laurie Hawn made it clear when he announced federal
> support for the Royal Alberta Museum project that construction must
> start by November 2012 or the federal funding will evaporate.
>
> The project is now going full steam ahead. The funding is in place. An
> architectural competition was held. A winner was picked. Contracts
> have been signed.
>
> Smith says museum project is “fantastic”
> But then came the election campaign.
>
> Danielle Smith has now made it crystal clear that if she were premier,
> she would delay the project. Not kill it, delay it.
>
> She wants to balance the budget and build other crucial infrastructure
> before the museum project proceeds.
>
> This is a fair enough position for Smith to take, though it will be
> costly to break contracts and it’s also a waste of the millions
> already spend on the project.
>
> But a balanced budget is important. Schools, hospitals, C-Train and
> LRT, and roads are important.
>
> Still — and this is the crucial point — Smith wants to see this museum
> built one day. Here’s what Smith said on the matter last week: “I
> think Edmonton has already established itself as a major arts centre
> in the province. … We have amazing arts infrastructure. It’s the
> capital city so we have a lot of tourism that is coming to Edmonton.
> We promised (the museum) to the Queen back in 2005 and it would be a
> fantastic new facility to have in Edmonton’s downtown.”
>
> That’s a strong endorsement and rightly so. Hundreds of thousands of
> Albertans and tourists have enjoyed our many excellent museums. The
> Royal Tyrrell Dinosaur Museum in Drumheller, the Remington Carriage
> Museum in Cardston, the Reynolds in Wetaskiwin, the Head Smashed-In
> Buffalo Jump Interpretive Centre near Fort McLeod, these are jewels of
> Alberta’s culture.
>
> A delight for generations to come
> But the Royal Alberta Museum is the most important of  them all. A
> great new building for our most important collection will inform and
> delight Albertans for generations to come. It will especially have a
> major impact on children. They’ve flocked to the old museum for
> generations.
>
> So I heartily agree with Smith’s enthusiasm for the project. I do
> wonder, however, about delaying it. Smith says not to worry, she is
> already at work seeing if she can get the federal government to agree
> to keep the $122 million in place for when Alberta is finally ready to
> build in a few years.
>
> She may well succeed at that.
>
> But what if she can’t? What if the feds won’t keep that money in place?
>
> It makes no sense to throw away that $122 million in 2012, only to
> have to come  up with it  on our own in 2014 or 2015. The sensible
> thing for Smith to do is to try and get that commitment from the
> Harper government, but to also make a commitment to Albertans right
> now, during this election campaign, that if she can’t get the federal
> money put on hold that she won’t throw away $122 million, that she
> will build the Royal Alberta Museum right now with the help of that
> massive Ottawa grant.
>
> I wrote much of this already in my column on Wednesday.
>
> “… promise pork like Redford.”
> And that’s what set off Mr. John Hilton-O’Brien, a founding board
> member of the Wildrose in 2007 and the vice-president of policy from
> 2009-10.
>
> Said Hilton-O’Brien: “(David Staples) says if  (Danielle Smith) REALLY
> loves Edmonton, she’ll promise pork like Redford.”
>
> In response, I asked Hilton-O’Brien: “What ‘pork’ are you talking
> about? Why say this?” And: “Does it make sense to chuck out $120
> million in federal funding for Royal Alberta Museum? Sound Wildrose
> money management?”
>
> Hilton-O’Brien: “When someone actually comes out and demands money for
> their pet project, is there a better name? #porkitis.”
>
> Staples: “The money is ALREADY in place for Royal Alberta Museum. Is
> it sound fiscal policy to throw away $122 million from Ottawa?”
>
> Hilton-O’Brien: “Very likely that (Danielle Smith) will make that
> happen. But a specific funding promise? That’s unseemly.”
>
> Staples: “I am saying that the funding is there. Smith says she
> desires this project. Prove it.
>
> “Smith wants Calgary and Edmonton voters to trust her. If the Wildrose
> can’t build major projects in sensible way, why should we?”
>
> Who are the real Wildrose?
> At that point, Rod Ladouceur, the Wildrose vice-president of policy,
> entered the debate to remind me that Hilton O’Brien was the “past
> president” of Wildrose.
>
> He said this “pork” comment was Hilton O’Brien’s opinion, but wasn’t
> something any of the candidates or Smith herself was saying.
>
> “I do agree we shouldn’t toss out 120 million,” Ladouceur said of the
> federal funding commitment. “I personally trust Danielle & Team to
> make the right decisions.
>
> “She’s very, very smart. I know that Danielle and caucus won’t be
> foolish. Just need a chance to look at the books.”
>
> I appreciate conversing with people like Ladouceur. It assures me that
> the Wildrose has some reasonable and competent people.
>
> At the same time, with Hilton O’Brien’s caustic comment to mind.
>
> So just who are the Wildrose? The party of Hilton-O’Brien or the part
> of Ladouceur?
>
> Of course, the answer isn’t really either/or. The Wildrose is the
> party of both Hilton-O’Brien and Ladouceur. And that’s why I have my
> questions about it.
>
> And that’s why it’s reasonable to ask Smith to clarify the Wildrose
> position on the Royal Alberta Museum and to do it during the election
> campaign, when such a clarification is meaningful.
>
> The commitment …
> Will she make a common sense commitment right now to:
>
> a: if elected, seek out rock solid assurances that the $122 million in
> federal funding for the Royal Alberta Museum can be held in place for
> when Alberta is ready to build (no later than 2015).
>
> b) if she fails in getting such an assurance, commit to start building
> the Royal Alberta Museum in November 2012, when that $122 million is
> in place from Ottawa.
>
> This really is an slow, steady pitch for  Smith to hit.
>
> Nonetheless, it will still be reassuring to see her knock it out of the
> park.
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 17:44:06 -0700
> Subject: Tell it to Jimmy Prentice or the RCMP or the Alberta
> Sheriff's MAYBE they will believe you EH Scotty Baby Hennig?
> To: shennig@taxpayer.com, "Marianne.Ryan"
> <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
, "Randy.McGinnis"
> <Randy.McGinnis@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>, "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney.a1@parl.gc.ca>, "Jonathan.Denis"
> <Jonathan.Denis@gov.ab.ca>, "tim.turner" <tim.turner@gov.ab.ca>,
> "pej.prentice" <pej.prentice@gmail.com>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>
> Cc: Kevin Lacey <klacey@taxpayer.com>, Derek Fildebrandt
> <dfildebrandt@taxpayer.com>, Aaron Wudrick <awudrick@taxpayer.com>,
> David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> On 11/8/14, shennig@taxpayer.com <shennig@taxpayer.com> wrote:
>> ‎Like I said, we have that autoresponder set up. Thanks for forwarding
>> the
>> correspondence to our lawyers. They are reviewing it now. You can take
>> all
>> other CTF addresses off the list in order to maintain one set of
>> documents.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Scott Hennig
>> Vice President, Communications
>> Canadian Taxpayers Federation
>>
>>   Original Message
>> From: David Amos
>> Sent: Saturday, November 8, 2014 5:32 PM
>> To: fiojdiw3s@taxpayer.com; derek@fildebrandt.ca; dmh@bht.com; shennig;
>> greg.horton; Biage.Carrese; kas@karenselick.com; radical;
>> jennifer.johnston;
>> t.wilson; paul; deborah.alexander; david.allgood; jennifer.warren;
>> Frank.McKenna; joe.anglin@assembly.ab.ca;
>> rimbey.rockymountainhouse.sundre@assembly.ab.ca;
>> david.cournoyer@gmail.com;
>> Raj.Sherman; Rachel.Notley@assembly.ab.ca; Danielle.Smith; bbachrach;
>> Gilles.Moreau; Paul.Fiander; GillesLee; Gilles.Blinn;
>> Eric.Rosendahl@gmail.com; pej.prentice@gmail.com; DavidYurdiga;
>> awudrick@taxpayer.com; dfildebrandt; John.Williamson.c1; jason.kenney.c1;
>> Mackap; atlantic.director; Kevin.leahy; scott.macrae; Glen Canning;
>> justmin;
>> JAG.Minister; Rob.Merrifield@gov.ab.ca; dhowell@edmontonjournal.com;
>> lgunter; serge.rousselle; Jonathan.Denis; Peter.Edge; Peter.Edge
>> Cc: bob.paulson; premier; Geoffrey.McDonald; suzanne.anton.mla;
>> shirley.bond.mla; frankffrost; The Disinfector; brad.anderson;
>> Pete.Berndsen; David Amos; justin.trudeau.a1; MulcaT; leader;
>> Davidc.Coon;
>> jamiebaillie; Jacques.Poitras; nick.moore; oldmaison; andre; COCMoncton;
>> peter.dauphinee; premier; PREMIER; premier
>> Subject: Yo Scotty Baby Hennig I must say you are one sick little puppy
>> who
>> I am gonna enjoy filing against
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
>> Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2014 00:29:36 +0000
>> Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>>
>> fiojdiw3s@taxpayer.com
>>
>> Technical details of permanent failure:
>> Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the
>> server for the recipient domain taxpayer.com by aspmx.l.google.com.
>> [2a00:1450:400c:c04::1a].
>>
>> The error that the other server returned was:
>> 550-5.1.1 The email account that you tried to reach does not exist.
>> Please
>> try
>> 550-5.1.1 double-checking the recipient's email address for typos or
>> 550-5.1.1 unnecessary spaces. Learn more at
>> 550 5.1.1 http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?answer=6596
>> gn9si10239742wib.62 - gsmtp
>>
>>
>> On 11/8/14, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> How is your conscience doing after checking out my last email?
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: shennig@taxpayer.com
>>> Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2014 17:22:46 -0700
>>> Subject: Re: Yo Derek Fildebrand Whereas your mindless buddy Scott
>>> Hennig wants me to sue him personally along with you I will assume
>>> that these are your correct current addresses
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, derek@fildebrandt.ca, Aaron
>>> Wudrick <awudrick@taxpayer.com>, Kevin Lacey <klacey@taxpayer.com>
>>>
>>> ‎Please forward all correspondence to our lawyers at
>>> fiojdiw3s@taxpayer.com.
>>>
>>> You might‎ get a message that it has bounced, but ignore that, it's an
>>> autoresponder that we set up.
>>>
>>> Our lawyers will review all information you send to that address as
>>> they prepare our court defense.
>>>
>>> You can remove all other CTF email addresses from your correspondence,
>>> as it will be vital to ensure there's only one copy on file.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Scott Hennig
>>> Vice President, Communications
>>> Canadian Taxpayers Federation
>>>
>>> Original Message
>>> From: David Amos
>>> Sent: Saturday, November 8, 2014 4:54 PM
>>> To: derek@fildebrandt.ca; dmh@bht.com; shennig; greg.horton;
>>> Biage.Carrese; kas@karenselick.com; radical; jennifer.johnston;
>>> t.wilson; paul; deborah.alexander; david.allgood; jennifer.warren;
>>> Frank.McKenna; joe.anglin@assembly.ab.ca;
>>> rimbey.rockymountainhouse.sundre@assembly.ab.ca;
>>> david.cournoyer@gmail.com; Raj.Sherman; Rachel.Notley@assembly.ab.ca;
>>> Danielle.Smith; bbachrach; Gilles.Moreau; Paul.Fiander; GillesLee;
>>> Gilles.Blinn; Eric.Rosendahl@gmail.com; pej.prentice@gmail.com;
>>> DavidYurdiga; awudrick@taxpayer.com; dfildebrandt; John.Williamson.c1;
>>> jason.kenney.c1; Mackap; atlantic.director; Kevin.leahy; scott.macrae;
>>> Glen Canning; justmin; JAG.Minister; Rob.Merrifield@gov.ab.ca;
>>> dhowell@edmontonjournal.com; lgunter; serge.rousselle; Jonathan.Denis;
>>> Peter.Edge; Peter.Edge
>>> Cc: David Amos; justin.trudeau.a1; MulcaT; leader; Davidc.Coon;
>>> jamiebaillie; Jacques.Poitras; nick.moore; oldmaison; andre;
>>> COCMoncton; peter.dauphinee; premier; PREMIER; premier
>>> Subject: Yo Derek Fildebrand Whereas your mindless buddy Scott Hennig
>>> wants me to sue him personally along with you I will assume that these
>>> are your correct current addresses
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/8/14, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> You smiling bastards in the RCMP have a lot of Ghosts to answer to
>>>> along Highway 16 and they are not all Indian woman EH Bobby Baby
>>>> Paulson???
>>>>
>>>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/03/fwd-yo-bobby-boy-paulson-whereas-many.html
>>>>
>>>> http://www.hrw.org/news/2013/02/19/canada-rcmp-closes-ranks-abuse
>>>>
>>>> In an email late last week discussing the Human Rights Watch report on
>>>> police mistreatment of indigenous women and girls in northern British
>>>> Columbia, Paulson reportedly told officers "My message to you today is
>>>> – don't worry about it, I've got your back."
>>>>
>>>> "Commissioner Paulson's dismissive approach sets precisely the wrong
>>>> tone, and illustrates the challenges RCMP victims face," said Meghan
>>>> Rhoad, women's rights researcher at Human Rights Watch. "His comments
>>>> underscore the need for investigation of police abuse complaints by an
>>>> independent civilian agency that won't leap into organizational
>>>> defense mode the moment police abuse is exposed."
>>>>
>>>> Paulson further wrote that the RCMP has "tried to persuade [Human
>>>> Rights Watch] to provide the names and specific details of these
>>>> allegations in order that they can be investigated in accordance with
>>>> our external investigation policy. If not to us then to any other
>>>> investigative body. To date they have refused."
>>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=26CrTLEVNvQ
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Deena Lyn BRAEM Murder of
>>>> Quesnel RCMP Case No. 1999-7285
>>>>
>>>> http://www.unsolvedcanada.ca/index.php?topic=154.0
>>>>
>>>> http://www.hrw.org/news/2013/02/19/canada-rcmp-closes-ranks-abuse
>>>>
>>>> http://www.hrw.org/bios/meghan-rhoad
>>>>
>>>> http://www.hrw.org/reports/2013/02/13/those-who-take-us-away-0
>>>>
>>>> http://www.radicalpress.com/?m=201401
>>>>
>>>> Open Letter to the Federal & Provincial Honourable Members of
>>>> Parliament from Lonnie Landrud
>>>>
>>>> To the Honourable Members:
>>>>
>>>> Stephen Harper, Prime Minister; Thomas Mulcair, Opposition Leader; Vic
>>>> Toews, Federal Public Safety Minister; Rob Nicholson, Federal
>>>> Solicitor General; Christy Clark, Premier of B.C.; Adrainne Dix,
>>>> Leader, B.C. Opposition Party.
>>>>
>>>> I again find myself having to write to you the leaders of Canada and
>>>> British Columbia to try and put a stop to the attempts on my life by a
>>>> group of RCMP members and their paid informants.
>>>>
>>>> I have already sent letters to some of you Honourable Members and some
>>>> of you I have never contacted. So I will repeat my situation to put
>>>> everyone on the same page.
>>>>
>>>> I will start by stating I have contacted some of your Honourable
>>>> predecessors before and was either ignored or told that the government
>>>> operates separate from the RCMP and that they cannot interfere
>>>> personally or by way of office s they have no mandate to do so.
>>>>
>>>> What I am asking is for someone outside the RCMP with the mandate to
>>>> investigate the actions of all the RCMP members and their paid
>>>> informants to do so.
>>>>
>>>> If there is no one with a mandate to physically collect evidence or
>>>> interview witnesses, I ask that the laws be changed that gives someone
>>>> office that can investigate outside the RCMP.
>>>>
>>>> I ask that this staff be given the rights and mandate to go back
>>>> twenty-five years in order to look at all the relevant evidence. I
>>>> have been stuck in this situation for over fourteen years personally
>>>> however this has started way before then.
>>>>
>>>> If this cannot be done then I request a Public Inquiry into my
>>>> accusations against the actions of the RCMP members involved.
>>>>
>>>> On January 19th, 2013 I had another attempt on my life. At this time I
>>>> will not go into detail. I will state that this has been the eleventh
>>>> of crimes committed against myself and my life in order to silence me.
>>>> None of which have been investigated from outside the RCMP. Those of
>>>> which that were investigated by the RCMP enabled them to tamper with
>>>> evidence and they never interviewed me or my witnesses.
>>>>
>>>> I do know the more that these RCMP members do and fail the crazier
>>>> that I sound.
>>>>
>>>> These police officers would like you to believe that I am delusional,
>>>> however I ask for them to bring forth the evidence that can prove what
>>>> I saw and what I have lived, wrong.
>>>>
>>>> The stress of this situation is incomprehensible. Then add the fact
>>>> that the government's mandate has left me reliving it over and over
>>>> again in order to try to get our of this alive.
>>>>
>>>> Then add the fact the amount of numerous physical injuries I have
>>>> incurred during these attempts on my life to silence me.
>>>>
>>>> I will continue by stating that not one of these injuries has been
>>>> treated by a physician due to the fact that they do not want to
>>>> testify in court, for one reason that it would cost them money. For
>>>> the second reason that they are friends to some of these RCMP members
>>>> involved. Some of these member's wives are nurses.
>>>>
>>>> I will give one example of the many instances that left me feeling
>>>> like my life is not worth a plugged nickel.
>>>>
>>>> I had gone to the emergency department at the local hospital and as I
>>>> was having my temperature and blood pressure taken a Doctor Grapes
>>>> walks over and picks up my medical records and starts to read and as
>>>> he is doing this he looks at the nurse and states right in front of
>>>> me. I quote: "Isn't that funny, me and the other doctors have a bet on
>>>> who gets to pronounce him dead." I could not believe my ears. He then
>>>> set down my file and walked out the door.
>>>>
>>>> I will expand on this by stating that the cop who tried to murder me
>>>> in my hime and the one who I shot in the left arm with a 12 gauge shot
>>>> gun loaded with #4 birdshot, his wife was a nurse here in Quesnel for
>>>> years. She has worked with all these doctors and they all have seen my
>>>> internet statement on YouTube. (Quesnel, RCMP, Corruption: The Lonnie
>>>> Landrud Story – for those of you who haven't seen or heard about it).
>>>>
>>>> I will continue by stating that I am sitll suffering Post Traumatic
>>>> Stress Disorder (PTSD) and that I cannot even get treated because the
>>>> RCMP have stated that this event never happened, nor any of the
>>>> others. I for one know when I shot someone in my home and even if I
>>>> were in my home alone the RCMP members cannot prove me wrong. That
>>>> night they had to radio out on a public channel because their ghost
>>>> channels do not work or their cell phones due to my property's
>>>> location. There are dozens of people who heard what was taking place
>>>> and heard that Paul Collister was shot by me. There are a lot of
>>>> scanners here in public hands that are monitored around the clock. I
>>>> have spoken to some of these people. Perhaps someone should start to
>>>> listen to the whole truth! Like I have stated in previous letters, if
>>>> I could not prove my story I sure as hell would not be risking my
>>>> life. The evidence can speak for itself. I can sure point to a lot of
>>>> evidence, all's I need is for someone outside the RCMP to investigate
>>>> and to interview the people that I have spoken with.
>>>>
>>>> Now at this point some of you Honourable Members might want to send me
>>>> to the RCMP Complaints Commission or the Independent Investigations
>>>> Office of B.C. (IIOBC). I have already tried and neither one has the
>>>> mandate to investigate this situation. The Complaints Commission only
>>>> reviews paperwork put forth by the RCMP. The other's mandate is to
>>>> investigate only after September 12th, 2012. This is the date given by
>>>> Shirley Bond, BC Solicitor General to the IIOBC and this was after the
>>>> fact that she knew the situation that I have been trying to deal with
>>>> (I have a letter from her that was handed to her by Kevin Falcon and
>>>> the reply letter that she sent me). She too sent me to the Complaints
>>>> Commission. Then she signed a twenty year deal with the RCMP shortly
>>>> thereafter.
>>>>
>>>> There is not one thing that anyone of you Honourable Members can't
>>>> tell me to do that I have not tried. I have had five legal advocates
>>>> and not one could do anything. I have contacted hundreds of lawyers
>>>> and cannot find one to represent me. They are all scared to be
>>>> victimized by the RCMP. I've been to the media and had the same
>>>> outcome with then. I have also tried a private investigator and he too
>>>> was threatened with obstruction of justice charges which would destroy
>>>> his credibility. I have sent a letter to Wally Opal, Supreme Court
>>>> Justice who was looking into the murdered and missing women by way of
>>>> Public Inquiry. I received no reply at all.
>>>>
>>>> I have in my possession enough evidence to prove that I have No Legal
>>>> Rights, No Civil Rights and No Human Rights in Canada.
>>>>
>>>> The reason being the RCMP are above the law and will be until they no
>>>> longer investigate themselves.
>>>>
>>>> Now I would hazard to guess you're asking why would I continue to
>>>> expose myself to the danger that I face? My reply is these cops are
>>>> not going to stop trying to murder me anyway so what do I have to
>>>> lose? Then add the fact that I have survived this thus far. Unlike the
>>>> thirteen people who have been murdered by these RCMP members and on
>>>> top of all that the fifty girls that have came forward to the Human
>>>> Rights watch dogs in Prince George, B.C., then you had better realize
>>>> there is a lot more at stake than this. I've spoken to a few of them.
>>>>
>>>> There is no way in hell that I am going to sit back and let members of
>>>> the RCMP murder people. Just like I am not going to let you Honourable
>>>> Members hid behind your mandates and policies. Someone had better
>>>> realize that I have nothing left to lose but I still have a means to
>>>> expose this to the people of Canada and the world.
>>>>
>>>> Now I will tell you my story and I'm going to give the names of the
>>>> RCMP members involved and expose what they have done to cover up the
>>>> truth. I am not going to start with what led up to the first attempt
>>>> on my life.
>>>>
>>>> I was house sitting for a friend's mom when I witnessed the murder of
>>>> Deena Lynn Bream by Paul Collister and Bev Hosker, both members of the
>>>> Quesnel RCMP. But there was a paid informant, Dianne Fuccenecco there
>>>> also.
>>>>
>>>> I phoned the Quesnel detachment of the RCMP however their night calls
>>>> go to Prince George dispatch. I told them about the gun shots that I
>>>> was hearing, eight in all. It sounded like a twelve gauge shot gun. I
>>>> never gave my name. I was told that they would dispatch the police to
>>>> the location (Sugar Loaf Ball Park in West Quesnel). The next morning
>>>> I had a surveillance team in a trailer next door. It consisted of the
>>>> following RCMP officers: Constable Gill, Constable Gruending,
>>>> Constable Hughs, Constable Hosker and later on Constable Collister.
>>>> These are the names that I was giving to Sgt. Norrise of the Kamloops
>>>> RCMP the morning after I shot Constable Collister in my home.
>>>>
>>>> Unknown to me I was recorded and after the tape was tampered with was
>>>> used in court and with the Complaints Commission when I filed a
>>>> complaint. I can prove it was tampered with. I had a witness sitting
>>>> right next to me when I spoke to Sgt. Norrise and what I wait was a
>>>> lot different than the tape. What my witness suggested I tell them
>>>> (which I did) does not even appear on the tape. There are also other
>>>> discrepancies that appear on the tape.
>>>>
>>>> At the time I did not know the names of the members that, with
>>>> Constable Collister, came to my property. They were Constable Kinloch
>>>> and Constable Coutier (the ones on top of my house and the ones who
>>>> pursued me across my landing). Constable Barkman, Constable McMillan,
>>>> Constable Anderson, these were the police officers that I saw at my
>>>> gate. Constable McMillan and Constable Anderson were the ones who
>>>> hunted me in my field. This was the third attempt.
>>>>
>>>> The second attempt was a few months earlier in which Constable
>>>> McMillan, Constable Rogas came to my friend's home and arrested me for
>>>> obstruction of justice. I committed no crime and had no idea why I was
>>>> being arrested. I was severely beaten with a flashlight while in
>>>> handcuffs and taken to the Quesnel detachment where Constable Paul
>>>> Collister's old partner Constable Sardinea tried to murder me with a
>>>> pressure point attack that has not healed to this day.
>>>>
>>>> The attempts in between were by paid informants or police officers
>>>> that I could not get a good look at. I can identify some of the paid
>>>> informants.
>>>>
>>>> The eighth attempt was by Constable Ray Kinloch of the Quesnel RCMP.
>>>> He came to my rural home and property. He was dressed in camouflage
>>>> and wearing the same fur hat as the night that I shot Constable
>>>> Collister.
>>>>
>>>> It was an hour and a half after dark and he had to travel two
>>>> kilometres through the bush to be where he was at. I felt a direct
>>>> threat to my life and I shot at his head and then heard him run
>>>> through the bush and trip and fall. I left and went to my mom's. When
>>>> I returned a few days later I located where he tripped on a piece of
>>>> blowdown and I found something that fell out of his pocket. I also
>>>> have a witness to corroborate part of my story.
>>>>
>>>> The ninth attempt was by a paid informant. Again, severe injuries.
>>>>
>>>> The tenth attempt was by someone with a rifle with a silencer that
>>>> tried to shoot me in the head in my own yard. As I stated to Christy
>>>> Clark it was dumb luck that the bullet missed me. However I again did
>>>> not escape injury.
>>>>
>>>> The eleventh attempt was on January 19th, 2013 when, after spending
>>>> the night at my friend's trailer (the same one I phoned the police
>>>> from years earlier when I witnessed the murder), someone during the
>>>> night tampered with my propane ignition system in my truck by taking a
>>>> hose clamp off and pulling the hose off the intake to my engine and
>>>> also pulling a plug wire off the front spark plug.
>>>>
>>>> My truck also runs on gasoline and I was using that until my trip
>>>> home. When I changed over I was moving and had travelled a few miles
>>>> before the truck exploded. If I had been sitting still I would not
>>>> have survived. However I was moving and the explosion occurred beneath
>>>> the truck lifting it off the ground. The result was a near fatal
>>>> accident with a family of four including two children. They were
>>>> passing me and travelling in the same direction and were right next to
>>>> me at the time.
>>>>
>>>> I'm in a quandary and have no understanding as to why this situation
>>>> has been allowed to continue. I have tried everything humanly possible
>>>> to have this investigated from outside the RCMP. There is a lot more
>>>> information and witnesses that I can expose but for now I feel like
>>>> this should prove that this is no delusion.
>>>>
>>>> To the Honourable Christy Clark: Re: The letter that was your response
>>>> after the tenth attempt on my life. Here is what happened after you
>>>> suggested going to pro-bono law, Access to Justice. In late December
>>>> 2012 I tried five times to contact them and leaving messages. I
>>>> received no replies.
>>>>
>>>> I tried again in late January 2013 and spoke to someone. He stated
>>>> that he was the office manager. He never gave his name. I explained my
>>>> situation and what was taking place and what I have done. He suggested
>>>> that I run. I told him that I had nowhere to go. He gave me a phone
>>>> number and said that they could help me. It turned out to be a
>>>> homeless shelter. So I phoned him back leaving him a message. He
>>>> returned my call four days later. I explained to him that I did not
>>>> need a shelter, that I needed a lawyer to give me legal advice. To
>>>> this day I've had no legal advice!
>>>>
>>>> I again explained my situation. He stated that he was a lawyer and he
>>>> could not help me. I requested that in writing. His reply was, "We get
>>>> 10,000 calls a day and we do not have the time to write letters to
>>>> everyone." He went on to state that I should continue to deal with the
>>>> Complaints Commission. This after I explained to him that I've been
>>>> down that road before and they only review paperwork put forth by the
>>>> RCMP. He went on again to state that I should run!
>>>>
>>>> A couple of days later I phoned the Complaints Commission to request
>>>> the phone numbers of Bob Paulson, Head RCMP commissioner and Craig
>>>> Cullen, Deputy Commissioner here in B.C. I spoke to a lady who stated
>>>> she was a complaints commissioner and that I had no right to that
>>>> information. That she, herself, could not contact them directly. She
>>>> suggested that I try the RCMP website. I have no access to a computer.
>>>> I however have had and the web sites that are connected to me are
>>>> being stalked by the RCMP. I have exposed two such sites that have
>>>> been created by the RCMP. I will also state that my mom's phone has
>>>> been tapped and after contacting Telus I was told that I have no right
>>>> to that information.
>>>>
>>>> On January 19th 2013 I went to the Native Friendship Centre and spoke
>>>> to Criss Dunlope who handles legal aid and explained my situation to
>>>> her. She asked, "Why are you coming to me?" I told her that I needed a
>>>> lawyer and legal advice. She said that she was not a lawyer and
>>>> everything she could suggest I have already done. She went on to state
>>>> that I should go underground because my situation will not change
>>>> until the RCMP quit investigating themselves.
>>>>
>>>> On February 6th, 2013 I again phoned the RCMP Complaints Commission. I
>>>> asked the receptionist that answered if the commission's mandate has
>>>> changed or do the RCMP still investigate themselves. She stated, "No,
>>>> our mandate is still the same and the RCMP still investigate
>>>> themselves." I told her my situation and she said, "I will have an
>>>> analyst phone me back."
>>>>
>>>> I received a phone call twenty minutes later. It was a man's voice who
>>>> asked, "Now what the fuck do you want?"
>>>>
>>>> Now I am a logger and used to such belligerence until he continued by
>>>> stating, "We have been down this road in 2005 and we will not deal
>>>> with this any further you fucking asshole." So I asked him, "Can I get
>>>> that in writing?" He replied, "No, we have given you everything in
>>>> writing we are going to give you!"
>>>>
>>>> So I asked, "So you're telling me I have no rights. I just had someone
>>>> try to blow me up after I was at a friend's and some one tampered with
>>>> my propane system."
>>>>
>>>> He asked, "Did anyone see who did it?" I replied, "Well the only
>>>> enemies that I have been dealing with are cops and they are the ones
>>>> I'm trying to get investigated." He said, "No, we cannot help you." So
>>>> I said, "So you're telling me that you're going to do nothing just
>>>> like when I shot Constable Paul Collister? I mean it would have been
>>>> really simple to subpoena the medical records of Collister." I went on
>>>> and said, "You know that I did shoot him in the left arm with a twelve
>>>> gauge shotgun loaded with #4 birdshot! That he is still being treated
>>>> for a blockage in his ulna." I then added, "I could implicate him in
>>>> as many as thirteen murders." He then stated that they have done
>>>> everything that they could and then told me again that I could go fuck
>>>> myself.
>>>>
>>>> I understand why he treated me the way that he did. In my opinion he
>>>> did an inadequate and inept job when asked for a review by the
>>>> Complaints Commission. He went solely on the word of Sgt. Hildebrant
>>>> who was Constable Collister's cohort for years and then add the
>>>> tampered-with tape.
>>>>
>>>> I mean, would you not ask for proof that Collister was not shot? How
>>>> hard would it have been to ask for medical reports?
>>>>
>>>> It's also my opinion that the Complaints Commission is just a cover-up
>>>> organization for the RCMP and is a useless facet of our justice
>>>> system.
>>>>
>>>> Something I do not understand is why do the RCMP have such control?
>>>> They are just people like us.
>>>>
>>>> You know that I have been asked by lawyers why I was not dead yet and
>>>> why are you trying to get us killed?
>>>>
>>>> I have also been told that I am a threat to national security by these
>>>> same lawyers. I have always asked why? I'm just trying to deal with a
>>>> system that has a crack in it that I've unknowingly fallen into. I'm
>>>> just trying to stay alive. Is that too much to ask? I've had to relive
>>>> this much too long.
>>>>
>>>> The stress and anxiety and the fear for my life, along with the
>>>> physical injuries, has left me feeling like I'm being tortured to
>>>> death.
>>>>
>>>> I ask all you Honourable Members what do I do, let them murder me? I
>>>> have always stated to everyone that I may have to forfeit my life.
>>>> That, I have always expected, but I ask you, am I not going to fight
>>>> to defend my life?
>>>>
>>>> I mean I could go ballistic like the ex-L.A. police officer who was
>>>> reported to have murdered other police officers. I can relate to some
>>>> of the feelings but my no means can I understand why he did what he
>>>> did. I believe there has been enough killing already. That is why I'm
>>>> doing what I'm doing to prevent me from having to harm anyone. I have
>>>> only asked for someone to investigate from outside the RCMP and I
>>>> request to be put in protective custody till this is resolved. I also
>>>> request medical treatment to see if my injuries can be treated.
>>>>
>>>> On the other hand, what do I do if you ignore my requests? Do I go to
>>>> the United States and ask for asylum? These RCMP members are above the
>>>> law and will not stop till I'm dead and there is no one who protects
>>>> me from my supposed protectors. I always thought this was a free
>>>> country to do what I want within the laws of Canada. Having to live in
>>>> almost house arrest conditions for nine years has shown me that we
>>>> live in a police state. I cannot even go to my own home, I have to
>>>> live with my mother in order to feel any sort of safety and even then
>>>> it's very little. There has been no way out of this. I have tried
>>>> everything.
>>>>
>>>> I ask the Honourable Christy Clark about your letter dated November
>>>> 28th, 2012. You stated that you could not get personally involved. Yet
>>>> you sent my letter to the Quesnel RCMP detachment to be investigated.
>>>> Your actions exposed every piece of personal identification that I
>>>> possess to the people who are trying to murder me. These RCMP members
>>>> have a computer system called C.P.E.C. and now can track me where ever
>>>> I go in Canada. I ask you, is that not overstepping your mandate and
>>>> in doing so exposing me to further threat?
>>>>
>>>> The RCMP officer who phoned me on your behalf was police officer Ray
>>>> Kinloch. He asked me to go in and make a statement. I refused. Reason
>>>> one is for fear of my life and reason two is I'm not going to give him
>>>> the evidence so it can be altered or go missing.
>>>>
>>>> I realize that by stating this I'm not making friends or allies and I
>>>> do apologize if I've offended you. That was never my intention, ever.
>>>> I wish that I did not have to involve any of you Honourable Members
>>>> but what choice do I have? The truth is the truth and life is like
>>>> that. I have only tried to deal with what's been given to me.
>>>>
>>>> I believe that you are the people who look out for society's best
>>>> interests. These RCMP officers murdering people and investigating
>>>> themselves is a threat to society is it not? You Honourable Members
>>>> are our representatives by way of legal election. I've never voted for
>>>> who would be members of the RCMP and I sure never put them in a
>>>> position where they are above the law. This has resided in the
>>>> policies that government has mandated since the time of confederation.
>>>>
>>>> I believe that this arcane system has done nothing to protect myself
>>>> or anyone from being victimized by members of the RCMP and in doing so
>>>> has left these same RCMP members unaccountable for any crimes that
>>>> they choose to commit.
>>>>
>>>> I will state that if someone from outside the RCMP with a mandate to
>>>> investigate the RCMP does investigate and I am found not to be telling
>>>> the whole truth I would expect to be charged with obstruction of
>>>> justice with the full knowledge of the maximum sentence that can
>>>> brought down upon me. I fully expect to be held in compliance with
>>>> Canadian law.
>>>>
>>>> I ask you Honourable Members if the I.I.O. office in Ontario can
>>>> investigate the members of the B.C. RCMP. They have been mandated for
>>>> a longer period of time. I however do not know if they can be
>>>> interprovincial. They are a federal branch are they not? I have no way
>>>> to contact them.
>>>>
>>>> Look. I am not trying to destroy the RCMP. I just believe that they
>>>> should be held accountable. I also know that they are a valuable
>>>> organization with a lot of good people who are a benefit to society's
>>>> safety. On the other hand there is a subculture within the RCMP that
>>>> is a detriment to the safety of the Canadian public by being above the
>>>> law and investigating themselves.
>>>>
>>>> Please do something. I cannot go on living in fear for my life when I
>>>> know that the laws can be changed and I can feel free to live my life
>>>> again.
>>>>
>>>> I do request a reply in writing from all you Honourable Members in
>>>> regards to this matter.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you. God bless.
>>>>
>>>> Yours truly,
>>>>
>>>> Lonnie Gabriel Landrud
>>>> April 24th, 2013
>>>>
>>>> FYI Frank Frost told me tonight that Lonnie Landrud amongst many
>>>> others witnessed the CROWN prosecutor Geoffrey McDonald file HARD COPY
>>>> of some of my documents into the PUBLIC RECORD of Frank Frost's matter
>>>> in a fainthearted effort to make him appear to be crazy. However I had
>>>> already kinda sorta figured it out byway of reading what the
>>>> chickenshit neo nazi Arty Baby Topham had to say about it and hearing
>>>> about the local cops in the Maritmes harassing my friends
>>>>
>>>> http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=4207
>>>>
>>>> "On Monday, February 3rd Frank Frost appeared in the Prince George
>>>> Court House regarding an application which he had filed earlier
>>>> demanding that his bail conditions be fully rescinded. When he arrived
>>>> at the courthouse he had some additional evidence with him in his
>>>> briefcase (which he affectionately refers to as his "Pandora's Box")
>>>> that could prove to be a major blow to the guilty parties involved in
>>>> his own arrest and the arrest of his partner Carrie Rupf. As well he
>>>> was able to also present to the court another major case of federal
>>>> government corruption with international repercussions that's been
>>>> held back for close to fifteen years now and is one that former
>>>> federal Attorney General Ann McClellan had recommended police
>>>> investigate years ago.
>>>>
>>>> Appearing before Judge Gray and flanked by Crown Prosecutor Geoff
>>>> McDonald, Frank Frost proceeded to present his arguments and his
>>>> evidence to the court, all of which was accepted. Crown Counsel
>>>> McDonald attempted to persuade the judge that Mr. Frost ought to have
>>>> a "mental evaluation" rather than be taken seriously by the court but
>>>> the judge was not prepared to grant any order of that nature and
>>>> allowed Frost to carry on with his arguments. Crown Counsel had good
>>>> reason to try that last ditch attempt to stop Frank Frost which will
>>>> become all too apparent to readers."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I bet that Jennifer.Johnston, Geoffrey McDonald and their RCMP buddies
>>>> won't soon forget some very pissed off folks telling them off in a
>>>> very public fashion this summer EH?
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgtHZyCc-grAZ7G6YV2BZsw
>>>>
>>>> Veritas Vincit
>>>> David Raymonf Amos
>>>> 903 800 0369
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: "Johnston, Jennifer JAG:EX" <Jennifer.Johnston@gov.bc.ca>
>>>> Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 15:54:48 -0800
>>>> Subject: Out of Office: Yo Derek Fildebrand Whereas your mindless
>>>> buddy Scott Hennig wants me to sue him personally along with you I
>>>> will assume that these are your correct current addresses
>>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> I am out of town, returning the morning of November 13, 2014. If this
>>>> is urgent, please call Kathy Backer at (250) 992-4262.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 11/8/14, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> This was your address before you got married recently Its public
>>>>> knowledge Correct?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.ewedding.com/v30/main.php?a=efvgraham
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.taxpayer.com/media/edmonton%20sick%20days.pdf
>>>>>
>>>>> Derek Fildebrandt
>>>>> Unit 407
>>>>> 6223 - 31 Avenue NW
>>>>> Calgary, Alberta
>>>>> T3B 3X2
>>>>>
>>>>> I got this info about Scotty Baby from the public phone records
>>>>>
>>>>> Scott Hennig
>>>>> 9705 86 St
>>>>> Fort Saskatchewan, AB,
>>>>> T8L 2Z5
>>>>> 780-998-5459
>>>>>
>>>>> This is Scotty Baby bragging bigtime in his neighbourhood correct?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://fortsaskonline.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=15489%3Arotary-club-hear-from-the-canadian-tax-payer-federation&Itemid=33
>>>>>
>>>>> What Scotty Baby don't know about Mean Old Me versus Mikey Duffy and
>>>>> the Senate etc could fill a book EH Cpl Horton?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/11/fw-methinks-harper-his-lawyer-hamilton.html
>>>>>
>>>>> For the Public Record anyone with two clues between their ears can see
>>>>> that despite what your tax free organization names imply The Canadian
>>>>> Taxpayers Federation and The National Citizens Coalition you are just
>>>>> overpaid far right wing spindoctors who either work for politicians or
>>>>> have worked for them as you try to become politicians yourselves
>>>>>
>>>>> I bet by now you not so clever neo con punks have at least finally
>>>>> figured out that threats from politcal wannabes and their corrupt
>>>>> lawyers and cops pals don't scare Mean Old Me not even a little bit.
>>>>>
>>>>> Imagine if the neo con punks had figured out what has been going on
>>>>> been the Feds and I since 1982. The Libranos and the RCMP would not
>>>>> have their way with Canada for so long EH Assistant Commisioner Gilles
>>>>> Moreau?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Also for the Public Record John Williamson and Kevin Lacey should not
>>>>> deny that I have spoken with both of them personally several times
>>>>> since 2005 and sent them many emails since then. Kevin Lacey can't
>>>>> deny that his beloved Premier Hamm quit as Premier as soon as I
>>>>> informed Murray Scott the I would publish the letter below in Chucky
>>>>> Leblanc's blog while all the corrupt left wing CBC dudes were locked
>>>>> out of ther jobs and could not report it even if they wanted to.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://oldmaison.blogspot.ca/2005/09/sussex-gold-found-and-bernard-lords.html
>>>>>
>>>>> A few years later Chucky's blogging butt buddy Danny Boy Fitgerald
>>>>> opted to publish it as well so that the NDP he supports could tease
>>>>> Gordy Campbell
>>>>>
>>>>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/david-amos-vs-bcs-liberal-premier.html
>>>>>
>>>>> July 31st, 2005
>>>>>
>>>>> Lt. Gov. Norman L. Kwong
>>>>> Premier Ralph Klein
>>>>> c/o Att. Gen. Ron Stevens
>>>>>
>>>>> Lt. Gov. Iona V. Campagnolo
>>>>> Premier Gordon Campbell
>>>>> c/o Att. Gen. Wally Oppal
>>>>>
>>>>> Lt. Gov. Myra A. Freeman
>>>>> Premier John F. Hamm
>>>>> c/o Att. Gen. Michael Baker
>>>>> Halifax, Nova Scotia
>>>>>
>>>>> Lt. Gov. J. Léonce Bernard
>>>>> Premier Pat G. Binns
>>>>> c/o Att. Gen. Mildred A. Dover
>>>>> Charlottetown, PEI
>>>>>
>>>>> RE: Public Corruption
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey,
>>>>>
>>>>> Apparently everybody wanted to play dumb about my concerns and
>>>>> allegations so that Humpty Dumpty Martin's minority government would
>>>>> not fall and they could party hardy while the Queen was in Canada. As
>>>>> you all know months ago, I began faxing, emailing and calling the
>>>>> eight other Lt. Governors I had yet to cross paths with. I fully
>>>>> informed them of my indignation towards the Governor General Clarkson
>>>>> and two of her other Maritime Lieutenants Roberts and Chaisson before
>>>>> the latest wave of bad acting Yankees invaded my home in the USA
>>>>> without warrants or due process if law.
>>>>>
>>>>> I made certain all of the provincial Attorney Generals and Premiers
>>>>> can never deny the fact that I tried to make them well aware of my
>>>>> concerns and allegations in order to make everybody should sit up and
>>>>> pay attention. Not one person from any of your offices ever responded
>>>>> in any fashion at all. You can be certain that I expected the
>>>>> deliberate ignorance. It is one of the oldest tricks in the book that
>>>>> lawyers employ in order to play their wicked game of see no evil, hear
>>>>> no evil speak no evil. I knew it would happen particularly after Nova
>>>>> Scotia's Conflict of Interest Commissioner Merlin Nunn had blocked my
>>>>> emails before I had contacted you. I have no doubt it helped to
>>>>> relieve him of his ethical dilemma before the NS NDP decided what to
>>>>> do about their chance to unseat the Conservatives. I have no doubt
>>>>> whatsoever many lawyers in Canada were praying that the Suffolk County
>>>>> District Attorney would have me back in the loony bin by April 28th
>>>>> and that all your troubles would go away. I opted to let you all have
>>>>> your way and did not bother you anymore until the Queen had left our
>>>>> shores and Parliament quit for the summer. Now it is my turn to have
>>>>> some fun and raise a little Political Hell.
>>>>>
>>>>> While the Queen, Clarkson and Martin where all having a grand old time
>>>>> on the Canadian dime my little Clan went through living hell down
>>>>> here. Trust me, lawyers need to learn some new tricks. Ignorance is no
>>>>> excuse to the law or me. Making some Canadian Attorney Generals and
>>>>> their political buddies show me their arses is child's play to me
>>>>> after all that I have experienced in the last few years. If you doubt
>>>>> me ask Michael J. Bryant and Yvon Marcoux why I am so pissed at their
>>>>> bosses and the DHS. Then check my work for yourself. If the tag team
>>>>> of John Ashcroft and Tom Ridge could not intimidate me, believe me you
>>>>> people don't have a prayer. Both of those dudes have quit their jobs
>>>>> but I am still standing and squaring off against their replacements
>>>>> now. If it were not for all the decent folks I know, the snotty ones
>>>>> like you would make me feel ashamed to be a Canadian. There is no
>>>>> shortage of lawyers. It is just that ethical ones that are rare birds,
>>>>> that's all. You must know how easily the Canadian people can replace
>>>>> you with other lawyers if it becomes widely known how willing you are
>>>>> to ignore crime if it means some fancy dude may be compelled to suffer
>>>>> for his own wrongs.
>>>>>
>>>>> The justice system is supposed to be self-policing. It should clean up
>>>>> its own act rather than trying to maintain a false mask of integrity
>>>>> for lawyers that are obviously criminals. It is way beyond my
>>>>> understanding why you people would choose to support the likes of Paul
>>>>> Martin, Adrienne Clarkson, T. Alex Hickman and Billy Matthews if you
>>>>> are not all as crooked as hell as well. The deliberate ignorance and
>>>>> double-talk employed by the wealthy few to dodge simple truths is
>>>>> absolutely offensive to ordinary people blessed with the rare
>>>>> attribute called common sense. Not all folks are like sheep. Paul
>>>>> Martin's latest tricks make for a very fine example of truly how bad
>>>>> things are. Even amidst wholesale scandals breaking out hell, west and
>>>>> crooked everywhere lawyers and politicians just close ranks and stand
>>>>> together as thick as the thieves they are. I stress tested the ethics
>>>>> of the ladies of the Bloc Quebecois and the Gomery Inquiry immediately
>>>>> after Martin's carefully orchestrated little circus in Parliament on
>>>>> May 19th was a matter of history. Lets just say I was not surprised to
>>>>> not hear one peep in response from anyone other than to get a call
>>>>> from an unidentified and very nervous but cocky Yankee lawyer claiming
>>>>> that Tony Blair was mad at me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Pursuant to my phone calls, emails and faxes please find enclosed as
>>>>> promised exactly the same hard copy of what I sent to the Canadian
>>>>> Ambassadors Allan Rock and Franky Boy McKenna and a couple of nasty
>>>>> FBI agents on May 12th just before an interesting event in front of
>>>>> our home in Milton. I have also included a copy of four letters I have
>>>>> received in response since then that you may find interesting to say
>>>>> the least. I also sent you a copy of a letter sent to a lady Ms.
>>>>> Condolezza Rice whom our former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney
>>>>> considers to be the most powerful woman in the world. The CD of the
>>>>> copy of police surveillance tape # 139 is served upon all the above
>>>>> named Attorney Generals as officers of the court in order that it may
>>>>> be properly investigated. I will not bother you with the details of
>>>>> what I am sending to you byway of the certified US Mail because I will
>>>>> be serving identical material to many other Canadian Authorities in
>>>>> hand and tell them I gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy
>>>>> of this letter. All that is important to me right now is that I secure
>>>>> proof that this mail was sent before I make my way back home to the
>>>>> Maritimes.
>>>>>
>>>>> However I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material than
>>>>> what Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact the same
>>>>> material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky Boy McKenna in
>>>>> particular received, while I was up home running for Parliament last
>>>>> year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so I have also
>>>>> included a few recent items to spice things up for you. I am tired of
>>>>> trying to convince people employed in law enforcement to uphold the
>>>>> law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own conscience and be
>>>>> careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest
>>>>> assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse
>>>>> to the law or me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Veritas Vincit
>>>>> David R. Amos
>>>>>
>>>>> The enclosed letter from The Public Service Integrity Office, whose
>>>>> boss recently testified before the Gomery Inquiry and following quotes
>>>>> prove why I must speak out.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Well what do you expect?" said Le Hir in reaction. "Anybody who had
>>>>> been involved in that kind of thing isn't going to admit readily, or
>>>>> willfully, to having participated." Asked why he's waited 10 years to
>>>>> come out with his allegations, Le Hir said he was "sworn to secrecy."
>>>>> "I'm breaking that oath, and the only way I could have been relieved
>>>>> by that oath was by a judge in a court saying, 'Mr. Lehir, I
>>>>> understand that you have made an oath of secrecy; and you're hereby
>>>>> relieved of that oath." "Mr. Wallace added that police and the courts,
>>>>> not internal rules, are best-equipped to deal with bureaucrats who
>>>>> cross
>>>>> the line and break the law. But Judge Gomery did not appear satisfied.
>>>>> "It takes a major scandal to get the police involved," he said. "It is
>>>>> not
>>>>> in the nature of the public service to call in the police."
>>>>>
>>>>> Everybody knows that in order to protect the rights and interests of
>>>>> my Clan and to sooth my own soul, I have proven many times over that
>>>>> all lawyers, law enforcement authorities, and politicians in Canada
>>>>> and the USA are not worthy of the public trust. I maintain that their
>>>>> first order of business is to protect the evil longstanding system
>>>>> they have created for their own benefit rather than the people they
>>>>> claim to serve. Call me a liar and put it in writing. I Double Dog
>>>>> Dare ya.
>>>>>
>>>>> Baker got my material. So did everyone else. Only the Attorney General
>>>>> in Quecbec refused it. I bet our newest Governor General knows why. It
>>>>> is likely for the same reason she will not accept my emails. It should
>>>>> be obvious to anyone why I must sue the Crown.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That said I must add some more "info" about Jimmy Prentice and his
>>>>> minions for you " Taxpayer" dudes to try to ignore and also say Hey to
>>>>> couple of lawyers on your board of Directors one of whom I have
>>>>> crossed paths with before
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.taxpayer.com/about/board/david-hunter
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.taxpayer.com/about/board/karen-selick
>>>>>
>>>>> So Hey David Hunter and Karen Selick (Remember our doings with the
>>>>> evil Neo Nazi's estate and Zionists legal argument New Brunswick?)
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is a little Deja Vu for you.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/08/cbc-says-neo-nazi-estate-dispute-will.html
>>>>>
>>>>> https://twitter.com/kselick/status/361899947257368577
>>>>>
>>>>> Karen Selick ‏@kselick ·29 Jul 2013
>>>>> BLOG: You don't fight Nazis by becoming a Nazi yourself says @kselick
>>>>> http://huff.to/1e6eanr via @HuffPostCanada
>>>>>
>>>>> Michael Taube ‏@michaeltaube ·30 Jul 2013
>>>>> I completely agree with Karen's position. MT @kselick You don't fight
>>>>> Nazis by becoming a Nazi yourself http://huff.to/1e6eanr
>>>>>
>>>>> Dr. Dawg ‏@DrDawg ·30 Jul 2013
>>>>> @michaeltaube @kselick So you agree with Karen's laughable assertion
>>>>> that the Nazis opposed private property?
>>>>>
>>>>> Michael Taube ‏@michaeltaube ·30 Jul 2013
>>>>> @DrDawg @kselick Sorry, I don't follow. She wrote that the Nazis
>>>>> opposed Jews owning private property. That's correct.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dr. Dawg ‏@DrDawg ·30 Jul 2013
>>>>> @michaeltaube I misunderstood, then. I thought she was saying it was
>>>>> "Nazi" to oppose private property rights.
>>>>>
>>>>> Michael Taube ‏@michaeltaube ·30 Jul 2013
>>>>> @DrDawg No worries! She was just trying to show how the Nazis
>>>>> arbitrarily opposed Jewish ownership of private property.
>>>>>
>>>>> David Raymond Amos ‏@DavidRayAmos ·18 Aug 2013
>>>>> @kselick @huffpostcanada @DavidRayAmos I just left you a voicemail
>>>>> because it appears that we have a common foe
>>>>> http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=3081
>>>>>
>>>>> David Raymond Amos ‏@DavidRayAmos ·18 Aug 2013
>>>>> @huffpostcanada @kselick @DavidRayAmos BTW I am this David Amos
>>>>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html
>>>>> … proof of the pudding
>>>>> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf
>>>>> …
>>>>>
>>>>> I must say that bet that you agree that Arty Baby Topham is not a very
>>>>> nice Neo Nazi EH? Why have you not sued him for slander and libel?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=3081
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway i must say you VERY UNETHICAL "Taxpayer" people who are no
>>>>> doubt still generously supported by Bankster donations must at least
>>>>> recall why I sued three US Treasury Agent in 2002 or the documents I
>>>>> sent to your Wannabe King Harper and his Bankster buddies in 2006
>>>>> while your political pal Derek Baby was still in school N'esy Pas ?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/harper-and-bankers.html
>>>>>
>>>>> How about the letters I got from the Libranos and the CROWN in 2004 I
>>>>> bet your Bankster supporters enjoyed them EH?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/06/yo-pervert-as-i-said-it-is-mr-amos-to.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Jan 3rd, 2004
>>>>>
>>>>> Mr. David R. Amos
>>>>> 153 Alvin Avenue
>>>>> Milton, MA U.S.A. 02186
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Mr. Amos
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to my
>>>>> predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding your safety.
>>>>> I apologize for the delay in responding.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
>>>>> suggest
>>>>> that you contact the police of local jurisdiction. In addition, any
>>>>> evidence
>>>>> of
>>>>> criminal activity should be brought to their attention since the
>>>>> police
>>>>> are
>>>>> in
>>>>> the best position to evaluate the information and take action as
>>>>> deemed
>>>>> appropriate.
>>>>>
>>>>> I trust that this information is satisfactory.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yours sincerely
>>>>> A. Anne McLellan
>>>>>
>>>>> September 11th, 2004
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>>>
>>>>> On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne
>>>>> Clarkson, I acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and
>>>>> CD regarding corruption, one received from you directly, and the
>>>>> other forwarded to us by the Office of the Lieutenant Governor of
>>>>> New Brunswick.
>>>>>
>>>>> I regret to inform you that the Governor General cannot
>>>>> intervene in matters that are the responsibility of elected officials
>>>>> and courts of Justice of Canada. You already contacted the various
>>>>> provincial authorities regarding your concerns, and these were the
>>>>> appropriate steps to take.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yours sincerely.
>>>>>
>>>>> Renee Blanchet
>>>>> Office of the Secretary to the Governor General
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 10:26:07 -0600
>>>>> Subject: I just called Jim Prentice's number back and got a Fax
>>>>> Machine???
>>>>> To: wanderson89@gmail.com, info@jimprentice.ca,
>>>>> pej.prentice@gmail.com, OMBUDSMAN@cibc.com, thomas@lukaszuk.ca,
>>>>> "fortmcmurray.woodbuffalo" <fortmcmurray.woodbuffalo@assembly.ab.ca>,
>>>>> fortmcmurray.conklin@assembly.ab.ca, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>,
>>>>> highwood <highwood@assembly.ab.ca>, info <info@ricmciver.com>
>>>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
,
>>>>> John.Grierson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "Marianne.Ryan"
>>>>> <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
, Rhansen <Rhansen@calgarypolice.ca>,
>>>>> pol7163 <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>, "rod.knecht"
>>>>> <rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>
>>>>>
>>>>> So I called this guy and left a voicemail I strongly suggested that
>>>>> his "media" fella Google the following words
>>>>>
>>>>> info@jimprentice.ca david amos
>>>>>
>>>>> http://jimprentice.ca/latest/news/prentice-launches-campaign-for-pc-leadership
>>>>>
>>>>> Bill Anderson, Press Secretary
>>>>> Campaign Office of Jim Prentice
>>>>> 780-446-2564
>>>>>
>>>>> wanderson@jimprentice.ca
>>>>>
>>>>> Obviously I got strange message from your "Fax Machine" that I would
>>>>> like to discuss with Jim Prentice
>>>>>
>>>>> You received a new 0:30 minutes voicemail message, on Thursday, July
>>>>> 24, 2014 at 04:11:15 PM in mailbox 9028000369 from "JIM PRENTICE"
>>>>> <4034576157>.
>>>>>
>>>>> These are the numbers I called on Monday and I talked to real people
>>>>> both very nice ladies if my memory serves me correctly
>>>>>
>>>>> You can also call us at 403-617-3404 (780-756-3629 in Edmonton) or
>>>>> email
>>>>> us
>>>>> directly at info@jimprentice.ca. Calgary Office Jim Prentice Campaign
>>>>>
>>>>> However I certainly did call Jim Prentices'a personal number yesterday
>>>>> and left a voicemail. CORRECT???
>>>>>
>>>>> Veritas Vincit
>>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>>> 902 800 0369
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>>> Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 11:44:48 -0600
>>>>> Subject: I just called the CSA, Jim Prentice the CIBC again from 902
>>>>> 800 0369 and nobody picked up the phone as usual
>>>>> To: csa-acvm-secretariat@acvm-csa.ca, "Dean.Buzza"
>>>>> <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, pej.prentice@gmail.com, inquiries
>>>>> <inquiries@asc.ca>, "jennifer. warren" <jennifer.warren@cibc.com>,
>>>>> Kimberley.McVittie@cibc.com, joe.oliver.a1@parl.gc.ca,
>>>>> OMBUDSMAN@cibc.com, "david. allgood" <david.allgood@rbc.com>, "Frank.
>>>>> McKenna" <Frank.McKenna@td.com>, "deborah.alexander"
>>>>> <deborah.alexander@scotiabank.com>, inquiries@bcsc.bc.ca, mclellana
>>>>> <mclellana@bennettjones.com>, frankffrost <frankffrost@hotmail.com>,
>>>>> "Darren.Woroshelo" <Darren.Woroshelo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>>>> Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>,
>>>>> justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca, "hugh.flemming"
>>>>> <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, Peter.Klohn@fcnb.ca, Inquiries@osc.gov.on.ca,
>>>>> NSSCinquiries@gov.ns.ca, securities@gov.mb.ca, Don.Murray@gov.mb.ca
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.securities-administrators.ca/aboutcsa.aspx?id=80 recieved
>>>>>
>>>>> However I also called a lot of the various provincial regulators some
>>>>> picked up the phone found my files and some did not.
>>>>>
>>>>> For the PUBLIC RECORD they should have exactly the same documents that
>>>>> Mr Harper and his bankster pals recieved in 2006.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/harper-and-bankers.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Obviously the pdf file hereto attached at least proves that the
>>>>> corrupt cop Dean Buzza and his former boss Landslide Annie know
>>>>> everything
>>>>>
>>>>> Veritas Vincit
>>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>>> 902 800 0369
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: "Prentice, Jim" <Jim.Prentice@cibc.com>
>>>>> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:39:00 +0000
>>>>> Subject: Leave of Absence
>>>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, pej.prentice@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for your email.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please note that I have formally begun my Leave of Absence from CIBC.
>>>>> My CIBC email address and CIBC-issued mobile number are both inactive.
>>>>>
>>>>> Effective immediately, please contact me at
>>>>> pej.prentice@gmail.com<mailto:pej.prentice@gmail.com> and (403)
>>>>> 370-5628.
>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jim
>>>>>
>>>>> Hon. Jim Prentice, P.C., Q.C.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: OMBUDSMAN Mailbox <OMBUDSMAN@cibc.com>
>>>>> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:39:36 +0000
>>>>> Subject: Ombudsman Mailbox
>>>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for contacting CIBC.
>>>>> We received your message and will reply to you within 48 hours or 2
>>>>> business days.
>>>>> CIBC Office of the Ombudsman
>>>>> ******************************
************************************************
>>>>> Merci d'avoir communiqué avec la Banque CIBC.
>>>>> Nous avons bien reçu votre message. Nous vous répondrons d'ici les 48
>>>>> prochaines heures ou deux jours ouvrable.
>>>>> CIBC Bureau de l'ombudsman
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.securities-administrators.ca/aboutcsa.aspx?id=80
>>>>>
>>>>> CSA SECRETARIAT
>>>>> Tour de la Bourse
>>>>> 800, Square Victoria
>>>>> Suite 2510
>>>>> Montreal Quebec H4Z 1J2
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Tel: (514) 864-9510
>>>>> Fax: (514) 864-9512
>>>>> E-mail: csa-acvm-secretariat@acvm-csa.ca
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>>> From: Jonathan Denis QC <Jonathan.Denis@gov.ab.ca>
>>>>> Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 21:48:28 +0000
>>>>> Subject: RE: Here is some VERY serious gossip for the Left Wingers in
>>>>> Calgary (Tory ineptitude??? Methinks the Herald is no better EH Mr
>>>>> Minister Denis?)
>>>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> I've learned to ignore the noise and keep focused on the task at
>>>>> hand...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ______________________________
__________
>>>>> From: David Amos [motomaniac333@gmail.com]
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 10:14 AM
>>>>> To: mike@mikeellis.ca; Raj.Sherman@assembly.ab.ca;
>>>>> brianmalkinson@albertandp.ca; bill.kaufmann@sunmedia.ca;
>>>>> dbraid@calgaryherald.com; news1@beaconnews.ca;
>>>>> thowell@calgaryherald.com; msmith@michaelsmithconsulting.ca; Office of
>>>>> the Premier; Bruce.McAllister@assembly.ab.ca;
>>>>> Chestermere.rockyview@assembly.ab.ca; sarah@theanchor.ca;
>>>>> Louise_Healy@banffcentre.ca
>>>>> Cc: David Amos; ! Jonathan Denis; mnielsen; dfildebrandt@taxpayer.com;
>>>>> atlantic.director@taxpayer.com
; themayor; ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca;
>>>>> justin.trudeau.a1
>>>>> Subject: Fwd: Here is some VERY serious gossip for the Left Wingers in
>>>>> Calgary (Tory ineptitude??? Methinks the Herald is no better EH Mr
>>>>> Minister Denis?)
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.calgaryherald.com/health/Braid+daily+dose+Tory+ineptitude/10240038/story.html
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/politics/Prentice+Calgary+Foothills+Albertans+polls+four+byelections/10245774/story.html
>>>>>
>>>>> “The Wildrose, which has the most money to throw at this, is going to
>>>>> throw everything they’ve got at it to gain some credibility, momentum
>>>>> and publicity,” said Lori Williams, associate professor of political
>>>>> science at Mount Royal University.
>>>>>
>>>>> Since becoming PC leader Sept. 6, Prentice has tried to distance
>>>>> himself from the Redford government, promising to sell the fleet of
>>>>> government aircraft, introduce tougher accountability legislation, end
>>>>> entitlements and review rural health care.
>>>>>
>>>>> But opposition parties dismissed Prentice’s moves as mere
>>>>> window-dressing from a party short on ideas, intent on
>>>>> self-preservation and maintaining power after 43 years in government.
>>>>>
>>>>> “Don’t forget that all these things we’re hearing now — change,
>>>>> renewal, a new beginning — this is exactly what was rolled out when
>>>>> Redford came onto the scene,” said Bruce McAllister, Wildrose MLA for
>>>>> Chestermere-Rocky View.
>>>>>
>>>>> “And we all know how that ended, don’t we.”
>>>>> (403) 207-9889
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.princegeorgecitizen.com/news/national/wildrose-party-names-school-trustee-sheila-taylor-to-run-in-calgary-byelection-1.1410738
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.calgarysun.com/2014/10/01/schools-in-calgary-public-trustee-sheila-taylor-the-wildrose-candidate-for-calgary-west
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.theanchor.ca/2014/new-session-of-the-alberta-legislature-march-3/
>>>>> News Coverage/Reporter Sarah Papke 403.775.7525
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/politics/trustee+Sheila+Taylor+Wildrose+candidate+Calgary+West/10253253/story.html
>>>>>
>>>>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/09/looks-like-i-was-right-about-ezzy-baby.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Derek Fildebrandt
>>>>> Alberta Director
>>>>> Office Location:
>>>>> 3625 Shaganappi Trail NW
>>>>> PO Box 84171 Market Mall
>>>>> Calgary, Alberta T3A 5C4
>>>>> Phone: 1-800-661-0187
>>>>> Cell: 403-690-4910
>>>>> E-mail: dfildebrandt@taxpayer.com
>>>>> Twitter @ DFildebrandt
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://beaconnews.ca/blog/2014/10/sheila-taylor-run-wildrose-calgary-west-byelection/
>>>>> 604-560-5015
>>>>>
>>>>> http://albertandp.ca/brianmalkinson/contact
>>>>> (403) 219-8183
>>>>>
>>>>> http://mikeellis.ca/connect-with-us/
>>>>> 403-768-2720
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 18:31:07 -0600
>>>>> Subject: Fwd: Here is some VERY serious gossip for the Left Wingers in
>>>>> Calgary
>>>>> To: jwood@calgaryherald.com, plknowlt@ucalgary.ca,
>>>>> jenniferburgess@albertandp.ca, michelle.glavine@teachers.ab.ca,
>>>>> Rhansen <Rhansen@calgarypolice.ca>, pol7163
>>>>> <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>, highwood <highwood@assembly.ab.ca>
>>>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
, "Gilles.Moreau"
>>>>> <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
, "Gilles.Blinn"
>>>>> <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/wildrose+enlists+former+police+officer+take+prentice+byelection+battle/10249561/story.html
>>>>>
>>>>> “The PCs have been arrogant and out-of-touch,” said Macdonald.
>>>>>
>>>>> “I’m sorry, but the last two weeks of good news announcements by the
>>>>> new premier do not make up for the last several years of government
>>>>> entitlement and mismanagement.”
>>>>>
>>>>> Macdonald retired last year after 25 years on the Calgary Police
>>>>> Service, where she specialized in cybercrime prevention and Internet
>>>>> safety.
>>>>>
>>>>> YEA RIGHT I bet Ms MacDonald worked with your fellow corrupt cop ICE
>>>>> Staff Sgt. Steve Lorne EH Chief Hansen?
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ps8bousCoXA
>>>>>
>>>>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/06/re-mad-shangi-mr-baconfat-and-philip.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:11:07 -0600
>>>>> Subject: Here is some VERY serious gossip for the Left Wingers in
>>>>> Calgary
>>>>> To: greg.clark@albertaparty.ca, mclean@svmlaw.ca,
>>>>> Gwyneth.midgley@gmail.com, john.fletcher@shaw.ca, themayor
>>>>> <themayor@calgary.ca>
>>>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
,
>>>>> "ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca" <ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca>, "joshua.skurnik"
>>>>> <joshua.skurnik@hotmail.com>, lgunter <lgunter@shaw.ca>,
>>>>> wf.munsey@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> I will lay odds that Col John Fletcher knows exactly who Mr Baconfat
>>>>> is EH Ezzy Levant?
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:53:36 -0600
>>>>> Subject: Yo Jimmy Prentice the RCMP that you and your minions oversee
>>>>> are well aware that my brother did not call Mr Baconfat HOWEVER
>>>>> To: "pej.prentice" <pej.prentice@gmail.com>, "Marianne.Ryan"
>>>>> <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
, "rod.knecht"
>>>>> <rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>
, sunrayzulu <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>,
>>>>> patrick_doran1 <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, Rhansen
>>>>> <Rhansen@calgarypolice.ca>, deanr0032 <deanr0032@hotmail.com>,
>>>>> "Gary.Rhodes" <Gary.Rhodes@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, premier
>>>>> <premier@gov.ab.ca>, ">" <greg.weston@cbc.ca>, "Mackay.P"
>>>>> <Mackay.P@forces.gc.ca>, mccalj <mccalj@parl.gc.ca>, "McCallum.J"
>>>>> <McCallum.J@parl.gc.ca>, Mackap <Mackap@parl.gc.ca>, birgir
>>>>> <birgir@althingi.is>, birgittaj@althingi.is
>>>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
, "james.goodman"
>>>>> <james.goodman@forces.gc.ca>, danielle@wildrosealliance.ca,
>>>>> oldmaison@yahoo.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone recall this email?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/06/wrong-again-mr-baconfat-i-was-using.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Many cops including members and their Officers of Queen's Red Serge
>>>>> cannot deny the fact that their blogging butt buddy Mr Baconfat in
>>>>> Edmonton and his pal Dirty Dicky Dean in Sylvan Lake in have been
>>>>> threatening to kill members of my family for nearly 8 years. Nor can
>>>>> the corrupt cops deny the fact that I have the right to self defense
>>>>> particularly when the law enforcement dudes refuse to act within the
>>>>> scope of their employment. As far as I know duels are still legal as
>>>>> long as they are done on the CROWN"s property.
>>>>>
>>>>> If I opt to come to Edmonton AGAIN in order to file a lawsuit or two
>>>>> then take up the nasty Fat Bastard's far from cordial invite to kick
>>>>> his evil arse on parliamenty property is his buddy Rod Kniecht and the
>>>>> dudes in the RCMP gonna arrest me or hold Mr Baconfat's coat and take
>>>>> bet on the outcome?
>>>>>
>>>>> Veritas Vincit
>>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>>> 902 800 0369
>>>>>
>>>>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/2014/08/meet-fucked-up-amos-brothers-little.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Monday, August 25, 2014
>>>>> Meet The Fucked Up Amos Brothers, Little Davey,And Dale
>>>>>
>>>>> A few short weeks ago pathological liar, and convicted sex offender
>>>>> David Amos tried to con Lori, myself and cyber-space that he came here
>>>>> from his humble hovel in Halifax, to "get me." He was called out,
>>>>> called bullshit on and he has ran off to ignominious obscurity and
>>>>> silence. What's the old expression, "good riddance to bad rubbish?"
>>>>>
>>>>> So now little Dale Amos 780 713 6836 Fort Mac Murray has written me,
>>>>> and Lori twice to run the mouth and self aggrandize himself .
>>>>>
>>>>> This is first little missive: " Those Amos videos of your apartment
>>>>> are priceless. Are you going to meet him, or are you a gutless shit? I
>>>>> personally hopes he kills you."
>>>>>
>>>>> Then today little Dale Amos wrote this to Lori and me:
>>>>>
>>>>> "You could call me at 780 713 6836 and we could have a pow wow. If of
>>>>> course you have the sand the back up your words. My Brother is most
>>>>> definitely ready to hand you a proper shit kicking, and I wouldn't
>>>>> mind getting a piece of you after what you said about my nieces.....By
>>>>> the way when they are town Gracie plans to visit Lori at work and ask
>>>>> her personally about your blog. Heads up Dale Amos." END OF QUOTE
>>>>>
>>>>> Dale Amos it appears YOU are as much a pathological liar as little
>>>>> Davey baby is. Little Davey baby nor his paste swallowing "children"
>>>>> could ever rise to the purchase of bus fare, much less a plane ticket,
>>>>> to get to Alberta. In fact none of your inbred "family" have the
>>>>> intellectual capacity to find Edmonton on a map, on the very best day
>>>>> they ever had.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dale Amos YOU are a gobshite! Your Brother is a gobshite! If YOU feel
>>>>> so emotionally committed to "handing me a proper shit kicking," I
>>>>> cordially invite you try and do so before waiting for help to do so.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dale, send my love to your hooker nieces!
>>>>>
>>>>> Posted by Seren at 6:40 PM
>>>>>
>>>>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/2013/09/to-sum-up.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Tuesday, September 3, 2013
>>>>>
>>>>> To sum up!
>>>>>
>>>>> It is Tuesday, September 3. I am back still traipsing the shallow
>>>>> end of bureaucratic government, DND officialdom. David Amos is still
>>>>> unemployed and Mr. Canning, and Leah Parsons is still trying to extend
>>>>> and parlay their "fifteen minutes of infamy" into something more
>>>>> profitable. "For the love of God do something..." they cry. Which
>>>>> translates to, what can we get out of all this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Since Mr. Canning threatened me with "going national" on his blog,
>>>>> nothing has occurred. There has been no deluge of e mails to my home,
>>>>> none actually. NO torrent of comments to by blog, no promised calls
>>>>> from the "media" or outraged articles or other news stories,
>>>>> "methinks" Mr. Canning has overstated or exaggerated his importance,
>>>>> and influence. I am not over surprised.
>>>>>
>>>>> Rehtaeh Parsons is still dead, a victim of her selfish, addled and
>>>>> negligent "parents", to allow a fifteen year old child to be a drunk
>>>>> and promiscuous. According police there are still outstanding photos
>>>>> or at least one out there.
>>>>>
>>>>> David Raymond Amos still infects cyber-space threatening retribution,
>>>>> spam and imaginary litigation upon anyone that annoys or irks him.
>>>>> From Alison Menard, Robert F. O'Meara, Dan Fouts, Werner Bock, Mark
>>>>> Carney and the rest of the "snobby British Banksters and politicians,
>>>>> to our own "Stevie Boy Harper. Honourable mention goes to the unnamed
>>>>> security constable who David wants his name so he can sue him, for
>>>>> some arcane reason known only to, and understood by Amos. David Amos'
>>>>> e communications are blocked and ignored, as the products of
>>>>> whack-job.
>>>>>
>>>>> David Amos' "children" Max, and Laura are still hard working
>>>>> prostitutes, swallowing paste and giving rim jobs for thirty bucks, a
>>>>> pack of smokes in a pinch. And our "friend" David Amos is still
>>>>> calling Cruise line a gay chat site for thrills.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh dear....The more things change the more they stay the same.
>>>>>
>>>>> Posted by Seren at 4:23 PM
>>>>>
>>>>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/2010/06/canada-and-united-states.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Monday, June 7, 2010
>>>>> Canada and the United States
>>>>> Our friend convicted sex offender David Amos post a few sentences of a
>>>>> previous post of mine that was accurate then and still is.
>>>>>
>>>>> Friday, August 14, 2009 What does Amerika, the "Truther" movment,
>>>>> "God" and retards have to do with Canada?
>>>>>
>>>>> We do not have to worry about comment from Little Dean and Dave...they
>>>>> are to uneducated to understand most posts. So have you seen them,
>>>>> been annoyed or insulted by them, have you smelled their disease? Have
>>>>> you ever crossed the "medicine line" and seen some Yank being taken
>>>>> into custody because he just has..."this constitutional right to bear
>>>>> arms"...in Canada.
>>>>>
>>>>> I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
>>>>> being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
>>>>> demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
>>>>> "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
>>>>> into the US policy.
>>>>>
>>>>> At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
>>>>> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
>>>>> in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
>>>>> report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation.There was
>>>>> never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
>>>>> were deployed WMD.
>>>>>
>>>>> Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
>>>>> invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
>>>>> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
>>>>> (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
>>>>> about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
>>>>> that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
>>>>> authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
>>>>>
>>>>> There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
>>>>> its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
>>>>> to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
>>>>> folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
>>>>> upon."What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions are
>>>>> to met before US troop can redeploy?
>>>>>
>>>>> Prime Minister Jean Chretien and the PMO were even at the very
>>>>> preliminary planning stages wary of Canadian involvement in an Iraq
>>>>> operation....History would prove them correct. The political pressure
>>>>> being applied on the PMO from the George W Bush administration was
>>>>> onerous
>>>>>
>>>>> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
>>>>> military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
>>>>> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
>>>>> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
>>>>> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
>>>>> operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
>>>>> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
>>>>> ....not necessarily in that order.
>>>>>
>>>>> Essentially Canada was determined to stay out of Iraq, paid the price,
>>>>> of a larger role in Afghanistan to enable US military assets to
>>>>> redeploy to Iraq. The
>

 

No comments:

Post a Comment