---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 18:30:00 -0300
Subject: YO Chris Lorfida maybe the Ghost of Randy Weaver will make
James Bovard et al finally sit up and pay attention
To: Chris.Iorfida@cbc.ca, jeffrey.a.tucker@gmail.com,
jim@jimbovard.com, jbovard@his.com, james.caton@ndsu.edu,
fiona.harrigan@gmail.com, sandyjfs@yahoo.com, cbreashears@stlawu.edu,
robertericwright@gmail.com, alexander.w.salter@ttu.edu,
eyang@studentsforliberty.org, donjbx@gmail.com, bcarson@hsc.edu,
press@aier.org, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, editor
<editor@wikileaks.org>, "Ian.Shugart" <Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>,
nspector@globeandmail.ca, ombudsman@washpost.com,
shenderson600@freepress.com, shine@foxnews.com,
shoupt@globeandmail.ca, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
"Bill.Hogan" <Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
Randy Weaver, key figure behind bloody Ruby Ridge standoff near Canada-U.S. border, dies
1992 northern Idaho incident killed 3 in a touchstone for anti-government campaigners
· CBC News · Posted: May 14, 2022 4:00 AM ET
Randy
Weaver is shown on April 27, 1996. Weaver, patriarch of a family that
were involved in an 11-day Idaho standoff in 1992 with federal agents
that left three people dead and served as a spark for the growth of
anti-government extremists, has died at the age of 74. (Jim Mone/The Associated Press)
Randy Weaver, who refused to leave his remote Idaho cabin to answer a U.S. gun charge with bloody consequences, died this week.
According to a social media post from his daughter Sara, Randy Weaver died on Wednesday at 74. She did not disclose a cause of death.
This year marks the 30th anniversary of the 11-day Ruby Ridge standoff which saw separate, deadly exchanges of gunfire claim the lives of Randy Weaver's wife Vicki and teenaged son Sam, as well as a U.S. Marshal.
The run up to the deadly violence saw Weaver likely entrapped in a sale of illegal guns to an undercover federal agent, according to a U.S. Senate committee finding. Weaver, who refused to work as an informant, was charged for a gun offence before the standoff, which has become a rallying point for anti-government groups.
Few historians dispute that Ruby Ridge is a seminal event in recent U.S. history. It mobilized militia groups and Timothy McVeigh cited it as one of the triggers that influenced his bombing of an Oklahoma City government building in 1995.
"Ruby Ridge has continued to have a long-term resonance," said Mark Pitcavage, a senior research fellow at the Anti-Defamation League advocacy group. He said it's often one of the key historical incidents the far right summons whenever they perceive U.S. government overreach.
Randy
Weaver points to bullet holes in the door of his cabin, next to a model
of the property on Ruby Ridge in Idaho, at a U.S. Senate judiciary
committee hearing in Washington, D.C., on Sept. 6, 1995. (Joe Marquette/The Associated Press)
While the law enforcement community mourned U.S. Marshal William Degan, it was the suffering of the Weaver family that enraged many Americans.
"Ruby Ridge remains the key for understanding how the FBI is no longer leashed by the law," libertarian author James Bovard wrote on his blog Thursday. He cited what he characterized as overreach in the prosecutions of hundreds of U.S. Capitol riot participants and the recent hung-jury result in Michigan of men accused of plotting to kidnap that state's governor.
Randy Weaver, who has been held up as a martyr on the far right, held views that many would consider abhorrent. He and his wife disdained interracial marriages and subscribed to Christian Identity beliefs, which hold that Jews are imposters and white Protestants are the true descendants of Israel.
But, Pitcavage said, "that doesn't give the government licence to commit bad acts themselves just because the party on the other side is extremist, or even if they've done wrong."
"If the government is not careful in that regard, and they take actions like [what] happened at Ruby Ridge or Waco or [the Philadelphia MOVE bombing], the negative effects can have consequences and have reverberations far greater and far longer than you might ever have expected," he added.
The monthslong Waco, Texas standoff in 1993 ended with a federal law enforcement raid that saw 86 killed and the compound of the Branch Davidians, an apocalyptic religious community, burn to the ground. The 1985 bombing by Philadelphia police of a compound owned by the Black rights activist group MOVE ignited a generator and killed 11.
Extremism hotbed
As described in Jess Walter's book Ruby Ridge: The Truth & Tragedy of The Randy Weaver Family, the Weavers were a middle-class family in Iowa who became radicalized in the late 1970s.
They saw signs in everyday life that the violent end times the Old Testament prophesied might happen in their lifetime. Long before the internet turbocharged QAnon and other fantastical theories, the Weavers fell sway to conspiracies communicated through newsletters and videotapes that circulated on the fringes. For example, they believed the Soviets might soon invade — coming south through Canada — and that the IRS was illegitimate.
Idaho
was a hotbed for racist and anti-government milita groups in the 1980s
and 1990s. Here, supporters of Weaver demonstrate near a government
staging area on Aug. 23, 1992. (Jeff T. Green/The Associated Press)
They moved to a remote cabin without electricity in the early 1980s on Ruby Ridge near Naples, Idaho, about a 45-minute drive from the border crossing at Rykerts, B.C.
Like today's prepper movement, they stocked up and were armed and ready for any apocalypse.
"Guns were tools in our family," said Sara Weaver in the 2021 American Experience: Ruby Ridge documentary on PBS.
Federal law enforcement agencies were keyed on Idaho. The Aryan Nations were based there, and a similar group The Order had killed Jewish talk radio host Alan Berg in 1984.
Weaver was pressured to go undercover to infiltrate the Aryan Nations — a group he didn't belong to, but whose events he had attended. He was charged for the gun offences when he wouldn't.
'Good morning, Mrs. Weaver'
Law enforcement was watching his home after the gun charges were filed. After weeks of team surveillance, the barking of the Weaver family dog on Aug. 20, 1992 precipitated movement in the bushes and panicked responses from the family and security forces. Each side later insisted the other fired first. Weaver family friend Kevin Harris, Samuel Weaver and Degan fired weapons. The last two were killed.
The next day saw more gunfire. Vicki Weaver, standing in the cabin doorway holding her infant daughter, was killed instantly by an FBI sniper who thought he had Harris in his sight.
Larry
Cooper, a deputy U.S. Marshal at the time, is shown at a 1996 U.S.
congressional hearing alongside a picture of Marshal William Degan, who
was killed on Ruby Ridge. (Richard Ellis/AFP/Getty Images)
The standoff lasted several more days. For a while, the authorities were unaware Vicki Weaver had been killed. So negotiators continued to address her through a megaphone, to torturous effect on the sequestered family.
"Good morning, Mrs. Weaver. We had pancakes. And what did you have for breakfast?" they said, per Walter's book.
Eventually, Weaver and Harris — each suffering gunshot wounds — were coaxed down from the ridge, along with the three surviving kids.
The men were tried for first-degree murder in the death of Degan and acquitted. Weaver received $100,000 US after a settlement with the federal government and his children received $3 million.
A Justice Department probe concluded that there was no evidence that Weaver "was coerced or unduly enticed into selling the sawed-off shotguns."
Agents
of the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) are shown during
the standoff on Aug. 26, 1992 near Naples, Idaho. The ATF, FBI and U.S.
Marshals faced criticism over their tactics at Ruby Ridge. (Gary Stewart/The Associated Press)
The department's review of the shootings was sterner. It found that the rules of engagement "expanded the use of deadly force beyond the scope of the Constitution and beyond the FBI's own standard deadly-force policy."
Separately, a manslaughter case for the FBI sniper accused of killing Vicki Weaver was dismissed by the courts.
Weaver slammed McVeigh rationale
Ruby Ridge was followed just eight months later by the disastrous federal raid in Waco, Texas.
McVeigh, who would kill 168 with his bombing, seethed.
"What the U.S. government did at Waco and Ruby Ridge was dirty," he told Lou Michel and Dan Herbeck, authors of American Terrorist: Timothy McVeigh and the Oklahoma City Bombing. "And I gave dirty back to them at Oklahoma City."
Weaver was aghast hearing that.
"McVeigh took the law into his own hands. He had justified it in his own mind. I don't agree with him at all," Weaver said in 2001.
The
killings of Weaver family members at Ruby Ridge angered Timothy
McVeigh, who was executed in 2001 for the Oklahoma City bombing. (David Longstreath/The Associated Press)
Pitcavage believes it's important not to conflate every aggrieved, well-armed American. He sees a distinction between an off-the-grid type like Weaver and those who proactively want to subvert government function, as many of the convicted Capitol riot participants and Idahoan Ammon Bundy, who once led an occupation of federal land, have done.
While the most vociferous anti-government extremists would likely give no quarter to the FBI, Pitcavage points to the peaceful resolution of a lengthy 1996 Montana Freeman standoff as evidence that lessons were learned by law enforcement from the failings at Ruby Ridge and Waco.
Given the extraordinary, armed power which U.S. law enforcement agencies possess, it's critical the lessons from Ruby Ridge are remembered, Pitcavage said.
"The FBI not only has to learn lessons, and often learns the hard way by making missteps and seeing the ramifications, but as an institution [it] often has to relearn those lessons," he said. "They fade over time."
With files from The Associated Press
https://jimbovard.com/blog/
Randy Weaver, R.I.P. Ruby Ridge is not Forgotten
Playboy July 1995 Artist Amy CrehoreRandy Weaver has passed away. Three decades ago, he was entrapped by an ATF agent. Federal agents subsequently killed his son and wife. The Justice Department denied that anyone’s rights were violated but still paid a multi-million dollar settlement for the Weaver family’s wrongful death lawsuit. Federal abuses at Ruby Ridge, the subsequent FBI coverup, and the outrageous arguments that federal lawyers made in court to protect the FBI sniper helped awaken legions of Americans to the danger of boundless federal power.
On August 22, 1992, FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi killed Vicki Weaver as she stood in the door of a cabin at Ruby Ridge, Idaho, holding her baby. The FBI initially claimed that killing Mrs. Weaver was justified and then later covered up key details and claimed it was accidental. FBI chief Louis Freeh pretended his agents had done nothing seriously wrong. After an Idaho prosecutor indicted Horiuchi for manslaughter, the Clinton administration Justice Department swayed a federal court to dismiss the case based on the “supremacy clause” of the Constitution. But the Founding Fathers never intended for “federal supremacy” to nullify all of the Bill of Rights. Federal judge Alex Kozonski captured the soul of the case in a dissent that warned of the new James Bond “007 standard for the use of deadly force” against American citizens. Kozinski summarized the case: “A group of FBI agents formulated rules of engagement that permitted their colleagues to hide in the bushes and gun down men who posed no immediate threat. Such wartime rules are patently unconstitutional for a police action.”
Though the FBI insisted its agents had behaved impeccably, the feds paid a $3 million wrongful death settlement to the Weaver family. A top FBI official was sent to prison for destroying key evidence in the case.
The FBI has become more powerful and more dangerous since Ruby Ridge. After 9/11, the FBI turbo-charged its entrapment operations, compensating for its profound failures to detect the 9/11 plotters by generating endless headlines of crimes that its own agents had helped spawn. In 2016, the FBI interfered in a presidential election. Special Counsel John Durham may soon file charges on the FBI’s role in using false information to spur illegal surveillance of the Trump campaign. Just before the 2020 election, the FBI announced that it had thwarted a high-profile plot to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, but that court case is struggling badly after revelations that the FBI itself was at the heart of the scheme. After the January 6 Capitol Clash, FBI chief Christopher Wray jumped on the Biden administration bandwagon, labeling that ruckus as a domestic terrorism event. Across the nation, the FBI agents tracked down and interrogated anyone who was at that protest, and more than 500 people have been charged in federal court. The feds’ crackdown was spurred by presuming that “trespassing plus thought crimes equals terrorism.” But last Friday, a news report revealed that FBI agents had concluded that the allegations against most of those protestors were wildly overblown.
Ruby Ridge remains the key for understanding how the FBI is no longer leashed by the law. Below are some of the articles I wrote about this case from 1995 onward.
+++
USA TODAY
Ruby Ridge lessons for fighting right-wing extremism
When the government tries to squash anti-American ideas it doesn’t like, the results are often destructive of American ideals.
In the wake of the protest in Charlottesville by white supremacists, many people are demanding a crackdown on dangerous right-wing extremists. The federal government has previously carried out similar campaigns against with disastrous results. Rather than intellectually purifying the nation, such efforts are far more likely to turn nitwits into martyrs and to ravage Washington’s credibility.
Prior federal law enforcement efforts to take down “bad ideas” quickly spiraled out of control. In the 1960s, an FBI COINTELPRO operation set up its own 250-member Klan organization “to attract membership away from the United Klans of America,” as a 1976 Senate report noted. One federally-funded informant admitted that he and other Klansmen had “beaten people severely, had boarded buses and kicked people off; had went [sic] in restaurants and beaten them with blackjacks, chains, pistols.” Other FBI COINTELPRO operations sought to destroy black activists, including Martin Luther King Jr. One FBI office boasted of spurring “shootings, beatings and a high degree of unrest … in the ghetto area of southeast San Diego.”
Once the FBI committed to subverting “dissident speech,” its crackdowns became a bureaucratic growth industry that eventually included even women’s liberation movements. Nixon aide Tom Charles Huston testified in 1975 of COINTELPRO’s tendency “to move from the kid with a bomb to the kid with a picket sign, and from the kid with the picket sign to the kid with the bumper sticker of the opposing candidate. And you just keep going down the line.”
The best known case of federal right-wing ideological targeting climaxed 25 years ago at Ruby Ridge. Randy Weaver and his family lived in an isolated cabin in the mountains or northern Idaho. Weaver was a white separatist who believed races should live apart; he had no record of violence against other races — or anyone else. Undercover federal agents targeted him and entrapped him into selling a sawed-off shotgun. The feds sought to pressure Weaver, who often indulged in antigovernment bluster, to become an informant against the Aryan Nation but he refused.
After Weaver was sent the wrong court date and (understandably) failed to show up, the feds used any and all means to take him down. Idaho lawyer David Nevin noted that U.S. “marshals called in military aerial reconnaissance and had photos studied by the Defense Mapping Agency. They prowled the woods around Weaver’s cabin with night-vision equipment. They had psychological profiles performed and installed $130,000 worth of long-range solar-powered spy cameras. They intercepted the Weavers’ mail. They even knew the menstrual cycle of Weaver’s teenage daughter, and planned an arrest scenario around it.”
On August 21, 1992, six U.S. Marshals outfitted in full camouflage and carrying automatic weapons trespassed onto Weavers’ property. Three marshals circled close to the Weaver cabin and threw rocks to provoke the Weavers’ dogs. As Weaver’s 14-year old son, Sammy and Kevin Harris, a 25-year old family friend living in the cabin, ran towards the barking, a marshal shot and killed a dog. Sammy Weaver fired in the direction of where those shots came from. As Sammy was leaving the scene, a marshal shot him in the back and killed him. Harris responded by fatally shooting a federal marshal who had fired seven shots.
The FBI decided that Weaver was such a bad person that the Constitution no longer applied. Snipers from the FBI Hostage Rescue Team were sent in the next day and ordered to shoot-to-kill any adult male outside the Weaver cabin. A federal appeals court ruling noted that “a group of FBI agents formulated rules of engagement that permitted their colleagues to hide in the bushes and gun down men who posed no immediate threat. Such wartime rules are patently unconstitutional for a police action.”
On August 22, 1992, FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi shot Randy Weaver under the arm after he stepped out of his cabin. As he struggled to return to his home, Horiuchi shot and killed Vicki Weaver as she stood in the cabin door holding their 10-month old baby. A confidential 1994 Justice Department task force report was appalled that people were gunned down before receiving any warning: “The absence of a (surrender demand) subjected the Government to charges that it was setting Weaver up for attack.”
Weaver and Harris, who never fired any shots at FBI agents, surrendered after an 11-day siege. At their 1993 trial, federal prosecutors asserted that Weaver long conspired to have an armed confrontation with the government. Bizarrely, the feds claimed that his moving from Iowa to near the Canadian border in 1983 was part of that plot.
An Idaho jury found Weaver innocent of almost all charges and ruled that the shooting of the U.S. marshal was self-defense. Federal Judge Edward Lodge released a lengthy list detailing the Justice Department’s and FBI’s misconduct and fabrication of evidence in the case. After an elaborate coverup unraveled (a top FBI official was sent to prison for destroying key evidence), the feds in 1995 paid the Weaver family $3.1 million to settle their wrongful death lawsuit. This was not simply a right-wing cause: the American Civil Liberties Union was in the forefront of condemning federal misconduct at Ruby Ridge.
Federal vendettas spur citizen backlashes. On Tuesday, a Nevada jury, in what the Associated Press labeled a “stunning setback to federal prosecutors,” found four supporters of rancher Cliven Bundy not guilty for their role in a 2014 confrontation with federal agents in a dispute over cattle grazing on government land. Even though federal judge Gloria Navarro muzzled defendants and prohibited them from invoking their constitutional rights, jurors scorned federal claims that the men were part of a conspiracy against the government. As at Ruby Ridge, the feds pulled out all the stops to get their targets: The FBI created a bogus “independent” documentary film crew that spent almost a year visiting and pursuing the Bundy family and their supporters, seeking to gather incriminating evidence during interviews.
In a nation with hundreds of millions of people, there will be plenty of folks with antisocial or harebrained notions. But even if the government could eliminate everyone with heretical beliefs, the sheer extent of repression would spawn legions of new rabble-rousers. Freedom of speech is a more reliable antidote to toxic ideologies than unleashing the FBI or other federal agencies.
Bad precedents can be far more deadly than bad ideas. Ruby Ridge illustrates the folly of treating noxious ideas like ticking time bombs. The vast majority of devotees of deluded dogmas will be duds — unless the government detonates the scene.
James Bovard, author of Public Policy Hooligan, is a member of USA TODAY’s Board of Contributors. Follow him on Twitter @JimBovard
***
Playboy July 1995
HEADLINE: Overkill; the FBI’s gun battle with Randy Weaver
BYLINE: Bovard, James
The story has been told in The New York Times, The Washington Post and Soldier of Follune magazine. Somewhere you’ve read or heard about the 11-day stakeout that resulted in the death of a 14-year-old boy, a 42-year-old mother, a federal marshal and one yellow Labrador retriever. It is an American tragedy, one that must be retold until some sense of truth or justice emerges.
Randy Weaver lived with his wife and four children in a cabin in the rugged Idaho mountains 40 miles south of the Canadian border. The cabin had no electricity or running water, but the family survived, as had generations of pioneers. According to his lawyer, Weaver was “a little man who wanted to be left alone.”
According to the government, he was a heavily armed white supremacist, a former Green Beret, a member of a cult that believed a Jewish-led conspiracy controlled the government. He stood convinced that God had created separate races for a reason, and that the races should remain separate. Weaver was, said one agent, “extremely irritable, and saw people plotting against him.”
Weaver had every reason to be paranoid. People were plotting against him. No fewer than three government agencies targeted Randy Weaver.
ENTRAPMENT?
Agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms were the first to turn their attention on Weaver. In 1989 Kenneth Fadley, a BATF informant, persuaded Weaver to sell him two sawed-off shotguns, carefully pointing out where he wanted the barrels cut – one-quarter of an inch below the legal length.
Prior to the sting operation, Weaver had no criminal record. The agents had noticed Weaver and members of his family at a meeting of the Aryan Nation, a white supremacist movement based in the panhandle of Idaho. According to Weaver the BATF then threatened him, saying that unless he promised to infiltrate the Aryan Nation and turn informer, they would prosecute. He refused; charges were filed in December 1990.
A court date was set, then changed. A probation officer sent a letter to Weaver with yet another date. When Weaver failed to appear, a warrant was issued.
WYATT EARP MEETS RAMBO
Federal agents launched an elaborate 18-month surveillance of Weaver’s cabin and land. The agency this time was the U.S. Marshal. Service (headed by former Meese Commission star Henry Hudson), which is responsible for serving high-risk warrants. The service seems to take its cue not from the Constitution but from Hollywood. (As described in “One-Line Pedophiles” in the March Playboy Forum, Henry Hudson spent a small fortune trying to entrap two men to make snuff movies.) David Nevin, a lawyer involved in the subsequent court case, noted: “The marshals called in military aerial reconnaissance and had photos studied by the Defense Mapping Agency. They prowled the woods around Weaver’s cabin with night-vision equipment. They had psychological profiles performed and installed $130,000 worth of long-range solar-powered spy cameras. They intercepted the Weavers’ mail. They even knew the menstrual cycle of Weaver’s teenage daughter, and planned an arrest scenario around it. They actually bought a tract of land next to Weaver’s where an undercover marshal was to pose as a neighbor and build a cabin in hopes of befriending Weaver and luring him away.” All this despite the fact that the BATF had initially served Weaver a warrant without encountering violence (agents faked a car breakdown; when he stopped to help, they arrested him). According to several reports, Hudson’s Special Operations Group thought it was up against Rambo. Had the government bothered to look carefully at service records, it would have known better. According to Soldier of Fortune, Weaver never completed Special Forces training. He was an engineer in support personnel for the Green Berets.
“Although the marshals knew Weaver’s precise location,” reports Nevin, “throughout this elaborate investigation, not a single marshal ever met face-to-face with Weaver. Even so, Weaver offered to surrender if conditions were met to guarantee his safety. The marshals drafted a letter of acceptance, but the U.S. attorney for Idaho abruptly ordered the negotiations to cease.”
On August 21, 1992 six U.S. marshals outfitted in full camouflage and painted faces entered Weaver’s property. They carried automatic weapons. They had been told to avoid contact with the Weavers, but had visited a shooting range the night before to sight in their weapons. The group leader was familiar with the terrain: It was deputy marshal Arthur Roderick’s 24th visit to the cabin. One of the Weaver family’s dogs, Striker, caught scent of the agents and ran barking down the hill. Weaver’s 14-year-old son, Sammy, and Kevin Harris, a 25-year-old family friend who lived with the Weavers in the cabin, followed.
What happened next is a horrible vision of law enforcement agents out of control. Lawyers, for the defendants say that Roderick shot the dog, shattering its haunches. Sammy, Weaver fired two shots at the man who had just killed his dog. Randy Weaver called out to his son. Sammy yelled, “I’m coming, Dad,” then turned to run to safety. A bullet from a U.S. marshal nearly tore off his arm; a second bullet entered his back, killing him.
At some point during the exchange deputy marshal William Degan stood up and yelled “Freeze.” Harris fired, killing the marshal. Federal agents testified in court that Degan had been killed by the first shot of the exchange, but were unable to explain how it was that the marshal had fired seven shots from his gun before he was shot.
Who was writing this script?
FBI MUTANT NINJAS
The surviving marshals trooped down the mountain and called for help. As Weaver retrieved his son’s body, the FBI’s elite paramilitary Hostage Rescue Team boarded a plane in Washington, D.C. Almost 400 state and federal agents surrounded the site of the standoff. Although no shots came from the cabin, FBI team commander Richard Rogers changed the standard rules of engagement. The HRT sharpshooters were told to shoot any armed adult male on sight, whether he posed an immediate threat or not.
The next day, August 22, Randy Weaver – with daughter Sara and Kevin Harris – walked from his cabin to the little shack where his son’s body lay. As he lifted the latch on the shack’s door, Weaver was shot from behind by FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi. Weaver struggled back to the cabin while his wife, Vicki, stood in the doorway, holding their ten-month-old infant in her arms and calling for her husband to hurry.
Horiuchi testified that after shooting Weaver in the back, he followed Kevin Harris through his telescopic sight, leading slightly. He fired as the man rushed through the door of the cabin. According to The New York Times, Horiuchi, who claimed he could hit a target at a distance of 200 meters within a quarter of an inch, said he had “decided to neutralize that male and his rifle.” Instead, he hit Vicki Weaver in the temple, killing her. The bullet that passed through Vicki Weaver’s skull wounded Harris.
The paramilitary team then switched to psychological warfare. As The Washington Times’ Jerry Seper reported, “Court records show that while the woman’s body lay in the cabin for eight days, the FBI used megaphones to taunt the family. Good morning, Mrs. Weaver. We had pancakes for breakfast. What did you have?’”
Weaver surrendered after 11 days.
At the subsequent trial, the government sought to prove that Weaver had conspired for nine years to have an armed confrontation with the government. An Idaho jury found Weaver innocent of almost all charges and ruled that Kevin Harris’ shooting of the U.S. marshal had been in self-defense.
Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Louis Freeh justified the FBI shooting of Randy Weaver because sniper Horiuchi saw one of the suspects raise a weapon in the direction of a helicopter carrying other FBI personnel. But other federal officials testified at Weaver’s trial that there were no helicopters in the vicinity of the Weavers’ cabin at the time of the shooting.
Freeh also said the FBI’s next shot – the one that killed Vicki Weaver – was justified and that the killing was accidental. Freeh declared, “The question is whether someone running into a fortified position who is going to shoot at you is as much a threat to you as somebody turning in an open space and pointing a gun at you. I don’t distinguish between those.” Not even when the fortified position is a cabin filled with children?
Freeh found 12 FBI officials guilty of “inadequate performance, improper judgment, neglect of duty and failure to exert proper managerial oversight.” However, the heaviest penalty that Freeh imposed was 15 days unpaid leave, and that for only four agents. As The New York Times reported, Freeh has imposed heavier penalties for FBI agents who used their official cars to drive their children to school.
One of the most disturbing aspects of Freeh’s actions has been his treatment of Larry Potts, Freeh’s pick as acting deputy FBI director. Potts was the senior official in charge of the Idaho operation and defended the shoot-to-kill orders. Despite the finding of a Justice Department confidential report that the orders had violated constitutional rights, Freeh recommended that Potts face only the penalty of a letter of censure. That is the same penalty that Freeh received when he lost an FBI cellular telephone.
In a letter to Attorney General Janet Reno, Idaho Senator Larry Craig asked: “When does the Department of Justice consider it acceptable to fire on an armed citizen first – even if he or she is not threatening the life of any other person – and ask questions later? I am not alone in believing that firearms restrictions do not prevent violent crime; it is appalling that in this case, the enforcement of such restrictions actually led to the sacrifice of three lives. In this sense comparisons drawn between the north Idaho action and the Waco case are inevitable and deeply troubling.”
The Weaver case presents a great challenge to the competency and courage of the congressional leadership now in Washington. If Congress is not willing to look into such misconduct, who will protect the Constitution? Will Congress let the Justice Department and the FBI get away with murder?
James Bovard is author of “Lost Rights: The Destruction of American Liberty.”
**********
The Wall Street Journal
January 10, 1995
No Accountability at the FBI
By James Bovard
FBI Director Louis Freeh last week announced that no FBI agents would be fired or severely punished for their role in the botched attack on Idaho white separatist Randy Weaver and his family in 1992, which led to the death of Mr. Weaver’s son and wife. The announcement, which drew denunciations from both the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Rifle Association, is the conclusion of a patchwork of deception that has continued for more than two years.
Mr. Freeh, in his statement on Friday, declared that “the [Randy Weaver case] crisis was one of the most dangerous and potentially violent situations to which FBI agents have ever been assigned.” But this is patent nonsense. Given the growing importance of this case, a review of the facts is in order.
Randy Weaver lived with his wife and four children in an isolated cabin on Ruby Ridge in the Idaho mountains, 40 miles south of the Canadian border. Mr. Weaver did not favor violence against any other race, but believed that the races should live separately. Because of his extreme beliefs, he was targeted for a sting operation.
In 1989, an undercover agent of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms approached Mr. Weaver and pressured the mountain man to sell him sawed-off shotguns. Mr. Weaver at first refused, but the agent was persistent and Mr. Weaver eventually sold him two shotguns — thereby violating federal firearms law. A court official sent Mr. Weaver a notice to appear in court on the wrong day; after Mr. Weaver did not show up on the correct date, a Justice Department attorney (who knew of the error) got a warrant for his arrest. Federal agents then launched an elaborate 18-month surveillance of Mr. Weaver’s cabin and land.
David Nevin, a defense lawyer involved in the subsequent court case, noted later: “The U.S. marshals called in military aerial reconnaissance and had photos studied by the Defense Mapping Agency. . . . They had psychological profiles performed and installed $130,000 worth of solar-powered long-range spy cameras. They intercepted the Weavers’ mail. They even knew the menstrual cycle of Weaver’s teenage daughter, and planned an arrest scenario around it.”
On Aug. 21, 1992, six heavily armed, camouflaged U.S. marshals sneaked onto Mr. Weaver’s property. Three agents threw rocks to get the attention of Mr. Weaver’s dogs. As Mr. Weaver’s 14-year-old son, Sammy, and Kevin Harris, a 25- year-old family friend living in the cabin, ran to see what the dogs were barking at, U.S. marshals killed one of the dogs. Sammy Weaver fired his gun in the direction the shots had come from. Randy Weaver came out and hollered for his son to come back to the cabin. Sammy yelled, “I’m coming, Dad,” and was running back to the cabin when a federal marshal shot him in the back and killed him.
Kevin Harris responded to Sammy’s shooting by fatally shooting a U.S. marshal. Federal agents falsely testified in court that the U.S. marshal had been killed by the first shot of the exchange; evidence later showed that the marshal had fired seven shots before he was shot himself.
After the death of the U.S. marshal, the commander of the FBI’s Hostage Rescue Team was called in, and ordered federal agents to shoot any armed adult outside the Weaver cabin, regardless of whether that person was doing anything to threaten or menace federal agents. (Thanks to the surveillance, federal officials knew that the Weavers always carried guns when outside their cabin.)
With the massive federal firepower surrounding the cabin — the automatic weapons, the sniper rifles, the night vision scopes — this was practically an order to assassinate the alleged wrongdoers. Four hundred government agents quickly swarmed in the mountains around the cabin. Most important, the federal agents at that time made no effort to contact Mr. Weaver to negotiate his surrender.
The next day, Aug. 22, Randy Weaver walked to the little shack where his son’s body lay. As he was lifting the latch on the shack’s door, he was shot from behind by FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi. As he struggled back to the cabin, his wife, Vicki, stood in the doorway, holding a 10-month-old baby in her arms and calling for her husband to hurry. The FBI sniper fired again and hit Vicki Weaver in the temple, killing her instantly. (Mr. Horiuchi testified in court that he could hit within a quarter inch of a target at a distance of 200 yards.)
Reuters reported on Aug. 25, three days after the shooting: “FBI Agent Gene Glenn said that the law enforcement officers were proceeding with extreme care, mindful that Weaver’s wife Vicki and three remaining children . . . were also in the cabin. ‘We are taking a very cautious approach,’ he said in a statement to reporters.” An internal FBI report completed shortly after the confrontation justified the killing of Mrs. Weaver by asserting that she had put herself in harm’s way, the New York Times reported in 1993.
Though federal officials now claim that the killing of Vicki Weaver was an accident, the Washington Times’s Jerry Seper reported in September 1993: “Court records show that while the woman’s body lay in the cabin for eight days, the FBI used microphones to taunt the family. ‘Good morning, Mrs. Weaver. We had pancakes for breakfast. What did you have?’ asked the agents in at least one exchange.”
Neither Randy Weaver nor Mr. Harris fired any shots at government agents after the siege began. Mr. Weaver surrendered after 11 days. An Idaho jury found him innocent of almost all charges and ruled that Kevin Harris’s shooting of the U.S. marshal was self-defense. Federal Judge Edward Lodge condemned the FBI and issued a lengthy list detailing the Justice Department’s and FBI’s misconduct, fabrication of evidence, and refusals to obey court orders.
Justice Department officials launched their own investigation. A 542-page report was completed earlier this year that recommended possible criminal prosecution of federal officials and found that the rules of engagement “contravened the Constitution of the United States.” Yet Deval Patrick, assistant ttorney general for civil rights, rejected the findings last month and concluded that the federal agents had not used excessive force.
FBI Director Louis Freeh concluded that there was no evidence to show that Mr. Horiuchi intended to shoot Mrs. Weaver. Yet Bo Gritz, the former Vietnam War hero who represented the government when it finally negotiated Randy Weaver’s surrender after the death of his wife, declared that the government’s profile of the Weaver family recommended killing Mr. Weaver’s wife: “I believe Vicki was shot purposely by the sniper as a priority target. . . . The profile said, if you get a chance, take Vicki Weaver out.”
Mr. Freeh justified the FBI shooting of the Weavers because sniper Horiuchi “observed one of the suspects raise a weapon in the direction of a helicopter carrying other FBI personnel.” But other federal officials testified at the trial that no helicopters were flying in the vicinity of the Weavers’ cabin at the time of the FBI sniping.
One of the most disturbing aspects of Mr. Freeh’s slaps on the wrist last week is his treatment of Larry Potts, Mr. Freeh’s pick as acting deputy FBI director. Mr. Potts was the senior official in charge of the Idaho operation and signed off on the shoot-without-provocation orders. Despite the finding by the Justice Department that the orders violated the Constitution, Freeh recommended that the only penalty Mr. Potts face be a letter of censure — the same penalty Mr. Freeh received when he lost an FBI cellular telephone.
The Weaver case is by far the most important civil-rights/civil-liberties case the Clinton administration has yet resolved — and it resolved it in favor of granting unlimited deadly power to federal agents. If the new Republican congressional leaders let the Justice Department and the FBI get away with what may have been murder, they will be accomplices to a gross travesty of justice.
—
Mr. Bovard writes often on public policy.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The Wall Street Journal
Copyright (c) 1995, Dow Jones & Co., Inc.
Thursday, January 26, 1995
Letters to the Editor: No Coverup at the FBI
On Jan. 10, you published an editorial-page piece by James Bovard entitled “No Accountability at the FBI” concerning my decision to discipline FBI employees for their actions associated with the crisis at Ruby Ridge, Idaho, in 1992. I am disappointed that Mr. Bovard would write an article that contained misstatements and distorted facts.
Although this crisis occurred before I became director, I have made it a priority to ensure that all the allegations of misconduct by the FBI and its employees were examined and all necessary remedial action taken. Contrary to Mr. Bovard’s opening canard, there has been no “patchwork of deception” at the FBI. That I publicly announced that FBI employees had exhibited errors of judgment, neglect of duty, inadequate performance and failure to exert proper managerial oversight — within two weeks of completion of the administrative review I ordered on Oct. 31, 1994 — belies Mr. Bovard’s allegations that the FBI has sought to cover up any wrongdoing by the FBI or its employees.
The deaths of Deputy United States Marshal William Degan, Vicki Weaver and Samuel Weaver are undeniably tragic. Sadly, Mr. Bovard compounds the tragedy by mischaracterizing the circumstances surrounding these deaths.
Deputy Marshal Degan was shot and killed as he and fellow marshals were withdrawing from the area of the Weaver cabin after conducting a surveillance preparatory to executing the arrest warrant outstanding for Randall Weaver. Mr. Degan and his colleagues were acting under explicit orders not to engage the Weavers during the surveillance. Contrary to Mr. Bovard’s assertion, the deputy marshals did not try to provoke a confrontation; their intent was to retreat from the area without violence and they attempted to do so. Mr. Bovard’s unfair omission of facts misleads the reader and seeks to diminish the enormity of a tragedy that did not have to happen.
The circumstances of Vicki Weaver’s death are also grossly mischaracterized. Her death was accidental. The FBI sniper was firing at a person he reasonably believed had, only seconds before, threatened to shoot at a helicopter carrying fellow law enforcement officers. The shot was fired to prevent the armed subject from gaining the protective cover of the cabin from which it was believed that he and others could fire upon the law enforcement officers on the scene. Vicki Weaver was standing unseen on the cabin porch behind the outwardly opened door. Mr. Bovard fails to note that the bullet that wounded its intended target and that also accidentally struck and killed Vicki Weaver was fired along a path parallel to the front of the Weaver cabin and not at or into the cabin. Mr. Bovard’s inference that her death was intentional is clearly refuted by the conclusion of two offices within the Justice Department that Vicki Weaver’s death was accidental and not criminal conduct.
I support the public’s right to know about the workings of its government and the integral role the press plays in ensuring an informed public. The FBI should be held accountable for its actions. I do not believe, however, that articles such as Mr. Bovard’s, which ignore or twist the truth, further the important objective of public accountability.
Louis J. Freeh
Director
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The Wall Street Journal
Monday, February 27, 1995
Letters to the Editor: The FBI Should Face the Facts
Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Louis Freeh, in his Jan. 26 Letter to the Editor, denies the allegations from my Jan. 10 editorial-page article that the FBI has engaged in a coverup regarding its actions at Ruby Ridge, Idaho, in 1992. Unfortunately, Mr. Freeh’s comments indicate that his agency is not yet willing to face the facts.
Regarding the shooting of the U.S. marshal, Mr. Freeh asserts that “the deputy marshals did not try to provoke a confrontation; their intent was to retreat from the area without violence and they attempted to do so.” This is the same explanation that U.S. marshals on the witness stand first offered to the Idaho jury. After hours of cross-examination, a U.S. marshal admitted that the conflict began when a marshal shot and killed one of the Weaver’s dogs. Most American dog-owners would consider the shooting of their dog a provocation. And this is a peculiar way to “retreat from the area without violence.” Mr. Freeh does not even attempt to refute the fact that a U.S. marshal shot 14-year-old Sammy Weaver in the back as the boy was running away from the scene of the clash with the marshals.
Regarding the FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi’s killing of Vicki Weaver, Mr. Freeh asserts that the death was accidental and that “the FBI sniper was firing at a person he reasonably believed had, only seconds before, threatened to shoot at a helicopter carrying fellow law-enforcement officers.” The only thing that the FBI’s “helicopter rationale” for the shooting of Randy Weaver lacks is a helicopter. This was the same argument federal prosecutors made at trial in Idaho and it was thrown out of court by the federal judge. Other federal officials testified at the trial that no helicopters were flying in the vicinity of the Weavers’ cabin at the time of the FBI sniping. Chuck Peterson, an Idaho lawyer who was part of Mr. Weaver’s defense team, observed, “The Federal judge threw out the [federal charge that Weaver aimed at] the helicopter because it was so incredibly weak — it was not supported by anything.”
Mr. Freeh then states that the shot that killed Vicki Weaver “was fired to prevent the armed subject from gaining the protective cover of the cabin from which it was believed that he and others could fire upon the law-enforcement officers on the scene.” But Randy Weaver had never fired upon the FBI agents — he was merely a wounded man trying to struggle into his home and the arms of his family. Mr. Freeh’s doctrine essentially means that if a government agent shoots and wounds a private citizen, then the government agent must be presumed to have a right to kill the private citizen — because otherwise the citizen might shoot back at the government agent.
This is a peculiar guide for law enforcement in a free society, for a society in which lawmen are not supposed to be able to wantonly shoot private citizens based on mere suspicion.
Mr. Freeh mentions, regarding the shot that killed Vicki Weaver, that the shot “wounded its intended target and . . . also accidentally struck and killed Vicki Weaver. . . .” Mr. Freeh’s letter implies that the “intended target” was Randy Weaver; however, the sniper at trial claimed that he was shooting at Kevin Harris, a family friend staying in the cabin, who was near the door and was not even accused of aiming at the helicopter. Apparently, since he was in the vicinity of Randy Weaver, that was sufficient for the FBI to attempt to kill him. Mr. Freeh’s wording implies that the bullet first hit the “intended target” and then hit Vicki Weaver. However, the bullet first passed through Vicki Weaver’s head before hitting Kevin Harris. The sniper’s testimony at trial indicated that he may have thought that Vicki Weaver was actually Kevin Harris — but that is a lame excuse for shooting a mother who posed no threat to the federal agents.
Mr. Freeh seeks to justify the shot that killed Vicki Weaver by stating that she was standing (while holding her 10-month old baby) “unseen behind the outwardly opened door.” He claims that the shot was an accident, which others who have examined the case or were involved in the surrender negotiations deny. But what sort of hostage rescue team takes deadly shots by an open door of a single-room cabin occupied by a woman and children?
Mr. Freeh declares, “I support the public’s right to know about the workings of its government and the integral role the press plays in ensuring an informed public.” This is a fine sentence for a letter to the editor, but it is ironic that it comes just after a sentence in which Mr. Freeh invokes a confidential 542-page Justice Department report that he claims vindicates his agency. Why is the Justice Department refusing to allow the public access to its own review of the case? This confidential document reportedly concludes that the FBI rules of engagement “contravened the Constitution of the United States.”
In a case in which three people were shot dead, Mr. Freeh says he has taken “all necessary remedial actions” — i.e., “I publicly announced that FBI employees had exhibited errors of judgment, neglect of duty, inadequate performance and failure to exert proper managerial oversight. . . .” If this case was about how some city policeman’s negligence resulted in a major traffic jam, then Mr. Freeh’s action might be appropriate. But this is a case in which a federal judge and an Idaho jury basically found that the U.S. government was lying from top to bottom in the allegations it made in federal court. (The judge commented that 75% of the evidence that the U.S. government had presented at the trial had actually helped the defense.) Is it proper that FBI acting Deputy Director Larry Potts, the person in charge of the operation, received the same “penalty” (a letter of censure in his file) that Mr. Freeh himself received when he lost a cellular telephone?
Mr. Freeh claims there has been no “patchwork of deception” at the FBI regarding this case. But even the press statement issued on the day that Mr. Freeh announced the wrist-slaps on his subordinates contained false information. The FBI claimed that Mr. Weaver had been convicted of the original weapons violations charge. Actually, an Idaho jury ruled that Mr. Weaver had been illegally entrapped and instead convicted him only of failing to show up for the trial in 1991. The FBI claims to have been studying the Weaver case for more than two years — but still cannot even get the basic facts straight.
The American people look forward to learning the truth of the Randy Weaver case. Unfortunately, that truth will have to come from someplace other than the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
James Bovard
Washington
*****
USA TODAY, November 9, 2015
End Federal Agents License to Kill
by James Bovard
Do federal agents need a license to kill in order to protect us? Unfortunately, federal judges are giving law enforcement agents blanket immunity when they shoot Americans while the agents are on the job. It would be difficult to imagine a greater violation of equal rights under the law or a bigger mockery of due process.
After Larry Jackson, Jr., of Austin, Texas, was killed by a policeman in 2013, a local prosecutor indicted the policeman on manslaughter charges. Jackson’s family claimed that he had been executed by the policeman but a federal judge granted immunity from prosecution because the policeman “was acting in his capacity as a federal officer.” The ruling in the Austin case could extend federal immunity from prosecution for shootings to “hundreds, if not thousands, of state and local police officers who participate in federal task forces,” the Washington Post noted.
Federal officers have been involved in 33 killings so far this year. The Justice Department almost never prosecutes federal agents for shootings in the line of duty, and the feds have invoked the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution to block state and local prosecutions of federal agents in recent decades. The ruling in the Austin case “raises the question of when, if ever, a federal law enforcement officer can be charged with a crime for killing someone in the line of duty,” the Post noted.
The best-known case of immunity for federal officers involves Lon Horiuchi, the FBI sniper who in 1992 gunned down 42-year-old Vicki Weaver as she stood in a cabin doorway in Ruby Ridge, Idaho holding her 10 month-old-baby. Horiuchi previously shot her husband, Randy Weaver, who was outside the cabin and under indictment on a federal firearms charge. A confidential Justice Department report condemned Horiuchi for taking a shot with a high-powered rifle through a cabin door when he believed someone was standing behind it. But other Justice Department and FBI officials warned that permitting Horiuchi to be prosecuted would have “an enormously chilling effect on federal operations, especially law enforcement.” A local prosecutor indicted Horiuchi on manslaughter charges anyhow.
But federal judge Edward Lodge ruled in 1998 that Horiuchi could not be tried for killing Vicki Weaver because he was a federal agent on duty, and thus effectively exempt from any jurisdiction of state courts. Lodge focused on Horiuchi’s “subjective beliefs”: as long as Horiuchi supposedly did not believe he was violating anyone’s rights or acting wrongfully, then he could not be guilty. The judge even blamed Vicki Weaver for her own death. Lodge decreed that “it would be objectively reasonable for Mr. Horiuchi to believe that one would not expect a mother to place herself and her baby behind an open door outside the cabin after a shot had been fired and her husband had called out that he had been hit.” Thus, if an FBI agent unjustifiably shoots one family member, the government apparently receives a presumptive right to shoot any other family member who fails to hide.
The U.S. Marshals Service has been involved in 18 killings this year — more than any other law enforcement agency in the nation. But U.S. marshals enjoy de facto immunity for any use of force in the line of duty. Marshals Service spokesman Drew Wade told the Washington Post that “he could not recall a case that led to criminal charges.”
Prior to Horiuchi killing Vicki Weaver, 14-year-old Sammy Weaver and a family friend encountered a team of three undercover U.S. marshals who had taken up a “defensive position” not far from the Weaver’s residence; one of the marshals fatally shot Sammy. According to the friend, Sammy was leaving the scene when he was shot.
Even though the marshals’ statements and testimony on the conflict were riddled with contradictions, the Marshals Service gave its highest valor award to the marshal who killed the young boy and the other undercover marshals who provoked a firefight (in which one marshal was killed).
Judges tend to presume that killings by federal agents are immune from prosecution even though agencies are notorious for covering up the confrontations. As the Post noted, “details about shootings involving federal officers tend to be particularly closely held.” It took the Post almost two months to simply learn the name of a man killed during a recent FBI pornography raid in Chester, Penn.
It is absurd to presume that police are guilty any time they shoot a private citizen during a confrontation. But it is equally absurd to presume that all law enforcement agents are sacrosanct and all their killings justified. America is at risk of becoming a two-tiered society: those whom the law fails to bind and those whom the law fails to protect.
James Bovard is the author of Attention Deficit Democracy and a member of USA TODAY’s Board of Contributors.
Jump to navigation Jump to search
James Bovard | |
|---|---|
 Bovard speaking in Washington, D.C. in 2011 | |
| Born | 1956 (age 65–66) |
James Bovard (/bəˈvɑːrd/; born 1956) is an American libertarian author and lecturer whose political commentary targets examples of waste, failures, corruption, cronyism and abuses of power in government. He is a USA Today columnist[1] and is a frequent contributor to The Hill. He is the author of Attention Deficit Democracy and nine other books. He has written for the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, New Republic, Reader's Digest, The American Conservative, and many other publications. His books have been translated into Spanish, Arabic, Japanese, and Korean.
Early life
He has written Wall Street Journal articles about his experiences as a shiftless highway worker [2] and a one-season Santa Claus.[3] His early career was summarized in a 1988 National Journal profile headlined, "A Free-Lance Crab Apple Shaking the Federal Tree".[4]
Views
In 2017, Bovard criticized President Donald Trump for the missile strike in Syria and referred to it as his "biggest foreign folly." Bovard writes, "Four years ago, Trump warned in a tweet: 'If the U.S. attacks Syria and hits the wrong targets, killing civilians, there will be worldwide hell to pay.' But the Trump administration has sharply increased U.S. bombing while curtailing restrictions that sought to protect innocents. A British-based human rights monitoring group estimated Friday that U.S.-led coalition strikes had killed almost 500 civilians in the past month—more than any month since U.S. bombing began. A United Nations commission of inquiry concluded that coalition airstrikes have caused a 'staggering loss of civilian life.'" He also stated that "Trump's most dangerous innovation involves direct attacks on Syrian government forces."[5]
In 2018, Bovard was critical of Trump, saying that he "has said and done many things to appall the friends of freedom. From Trump's pro-torture comments to his praise of police brutality to his cruise-missile barrage against Syria to his threat to annihilate North Korea, there are ample signs that he scorns a freedom-and-peace posture."[6]
Bovard is a critic of the TSA, writing that "the TSA has a long history of intimidation. In 2002, it created a system of fines to penalize travelers with bad attitudes, charging up to $1,500 for any alleged 'nonphysical interference.' This included any 'situation that in any way would interfere with the screener and his or her ability to continue to work or interfere with their ability to do their jobs,' according to a spokeswoman. The TSA failed to specify exactly how much groveling was necessary and eventually abandoned the regime of fines." He also criticized the TSA's watchlist and concluded that "the TSA's latest anti-privacy charade is yet more evidence that the agency should be done away with. After pointlessly groping countless Americans, the TSA has no excuse for groping more."[7]
Media mentions
George Will, writing in The Washington Post, called Bovard "a one-man truth squad".[8] A 1999 book review in the Wall Street Journal called him "the roving inspector general of the modern state".[9] The New York Times in 2007 called Bovard "an anti-czar czar."[10] A Washington Post columnist on criminal justice referred in 2017 to the "great writer and civil liberties advocate James Bovard".[11] He discussed the War on Terror in a one-hour interview on CSPAN's Washington Journal in 2016.[12]
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2021 10:08:14 -0400
Subject: RE Lockdown: The New Totalitarianism by Jeffrey A. Tucker
To: jeffrey.a.tucker@gmail.com, jim@jimbovard.com, jbovard@his.com,
james.caton@ndsu.edu, fiona.harrigan@gmail.com, sandyjfs@yahoo.com,
cbreashears@stlawu.edu, robertericwright@gmail.com,
alexander.w.salter@ttu.edu, eyang@studentsforliberty.org,
donjbx@gmail.com, bcarson@hsc.edu
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, press@aier.org, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, editor <editor@wikileaks.org>,
"Ian.Shugart" <Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, nspector@globeandmail.ca,
ombudsman@washpost.com, shenderson600@freepress.com,
shine@foxnews.com, shoupt@globeandmail.ca
https://www.aier.org/article/
https://www.aier.org/staffs/
Jeffrey A. Tucker is Editorial Director for the American Institute for
Economic Research.
He is the author of many thousands of articles in the scholarly and
popular press and nine books in 5 languages, most recently Liberty or
Lockdown. He is also the editor of The Best of Mises. He speaks widely
on topics of economics, technology, social philosophy, and culture.
Jeffrey is available for speaking and interviews via his email. Tw |
FB | LinkedIn
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 21:22:48 -0400
Subject: RE Fifteen Signs You’re in an Abusive Relationship with the Government
To: lou.eastman@aier.org, Amelia.Janaskie@aier.org, Micha.Gartz@aier.org
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
https://www.aier.org/article/
Fifteen Signs You’re in an Abusive Relationship with the Government
Lucio Saverio-Eastman Micha Gartz
– December 31, 2020
---------- Original message ----------
From: noreply@wisconsin.gov
Date: 25 Dec 2020 00:14:48 -0600
Subject: Your message has been received
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for contacting my office. I appreciate hearing your
thoughts, concerns and ideas.
If you are reaching out to my office about COVID-19, you can find the
most accurate, current information about the status of COVID-19 in
Wisconsin at the Wisconsin Department of Health Services’ website
(https://www.dhs.wisconsin.
my top priority to ensure folks across our state have access to the
most up-to-date information available so you have the resources you
need to make informed decisions to keep yourself, your family, and our
neighbors and communities safe.
The best way to prevent illness is to avoid being exposed to this
virus. Please follow guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), current as of April 16, 2020, to help take
preventative steps that will limit your exposure and protect yourself
from COVID-19:
• Stay home as much as possible and avoid close contact with others
• Wear a cloth face covering that covers your nose and mouth in public settings
• Clean and disinfect frequently touched objects and surfaces
• Wash your hands often with soap and water for at least 20 seconds,
especially after going to the bathroom; before eating; and after
blowing your nose, coughing, or sneezing.
o If soap and water are not readily available, use an alcohol-based
hand sanitizer with at least 60% alcohol. Always wash your hands with
soap and water if they are visibly dirty.
o For information about handwashing, see the CDC’s Handwashing website.
o For information specific to healthcare providers, see the CDC’s Hand
Hygiene in Healthcare Settings.
• Stay home if you are sick, except to get medical care.
My office receives thousands of letters, emails, and phone calls every
day, but I want you to know that we are working on responding to your
message.
Again, thank you for contacting my office. It is an honor to serve you
and to represent the people of our state.
Tony Evers
Governor
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Gonski, Sarah R. (Perkins Coie)" <SGonski@perkinscoie.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 06:14:55 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Sidney Powell et al I just called your
office in Texas and many of your associates within the Dec 11th
filings
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I am out of the virtual office until Monday, December 28 and my
response to your email will be delayed. If you need immediate
assistance, please contact my assistant at dgraziano@perkinscoie.com
or 602-351-8078 and he will connect you with another member of the
Political Law Group.
Thank you,
Sarah
______________________________
NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other
confidential information. If you have received it in error, please
advise the sender by reply email and immediately delete the message
and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank
you.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Press <Press@usdoj.gov>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 06:16:10 +0000
Subject: Automatic Reply: Press@usdoj.gov
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting the Department of Justice's Office of Public
Affairs. Inquiries sent to this mailbox are no longer monitored.
To submit an inquiry, please visit
www.justice.gov/media<http://
via this form will be checked every 30 minutes from 9:00am – 6:00pm,
Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays.
To submit an RSVP for an event, please visit
www.justice.gov/MediaRSVP<http
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 06:18:16 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Sidney Powell et al I just called your
office in Texas and many of your associates within the Dec 11th
filings
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
understanding.
If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144.
Thank you.
Bonjour,
Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
veuillez visiter
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Merci.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000
Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
E3B 5H1
Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/
https://davidraymondamos3.
Saturday, 14 May 2022
Why Sweden is moving away from its 'non-aligned' status and towards NATO
---------- Original message ----------
From: Chrystia Freeland <Chrystia.Freeland@fin.gc.ca>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 03:07:40 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Hey Higgy do ya think Dougy Ford or Cynthia
Chung and Alex Krainer are clever enough to explain this email to
Ambassador Urban Ahlin before Trudeau et al cons the Swedes into
joining NATO and picing a fight with Russia
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 00:03:51 -0300
Subject: Hey Higgy do ya think Dougy Ford or Cynthia Chung and Alex
Krainer are clever enough to explain this email to Ambassador Urban
Ahlin before Trudeau et al cons the Swedes into joining NATO and
picing a fight with Russia
To: ambassaden.ottawa@gov.se, cynthiachung@substack.com,
xela.reniark@gmail.com, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, premier
<premier@ontario.ca>, yannvg@goulstonstorrs.com, Connie
<Connie@
<dd@blackdiamondstrategies.us>
<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, washington
field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Bill.Hogan" <Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>,
ugyfelszolgalat@bm.gov.hu, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
lbayer@politico.eu, "Melanie.Joly" <Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca>,
lgehrke@politico.eu, "George.Soros"
<George.Soros@
<Jean.Chretien@dentons.com>, birgittajoy <birgittajoy@gmail.com>,
smari <smari@immi.is>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, stkhm@international.gc.ca,
d.schirr@mckercher.ca, regina@swedishconsulates.ca,
joseph.lougheed@dentons.com, calgary@swedishconsulates.ca,
Matt.ehret@tutamail.com, halifax@swedishconsulates.ca, news
<news@hilltimes.com>, news-tips <news-tips@nytimes.com>,
"ed.pilkington" <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>
<postur@for.stjr.is>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
melanie.joly@international.gc.
ju.birs@gov.se, investigations@cbc.ca, dpike@amherst.ca,
briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>, oldmaison
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "freedomreport.ca"
<freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.
<fin.minfinance-financemin.
<david@vivafrei.com>
Invitation: Sunday May 15 2pm EST (an Afternoon with Alex Krainer)
Cynthia Chung
May 13
This Sunday May 15 at 2pm EST (Eastern Daylight Time), Matthew Ehret
will host an event entitled ‘An Afternoon with Alex Krainer’, which
will include a presentation and Q&A period.
Alex Krainer is the author of 'Appeasement: The Uncomfortable Truth of
the 1938 Munich Agreement' which can be accessed here:
Appeasement: the shocking truth about the 1938 Munich Agreement (part 1 of 3)
Appeasement: the betrayal in Munich (part 2 of 3)
The “Three Block” global agenda today and the role of finance (part 3 of 3)
Alex is an incredible author, market analyst, and researcher who has
made several unique contributions to historiography. Click on the link
below to access the Zoom link and join in to the 2pm EST live
presentation and Q&A period:...
Subscribe to Through A Glass Darkly to read the rest.
Matthew Ehret. Address: 7525 Marquette Montreal, QC H2E 2E2 CA;
Telephone: 514-692-2969; Email: Matt.ehret@tutamail.com ...
https://cynthiachung.substack.
How the Ukrainian Nationalist Movement Post-WWII was Bought and Paid
for by the CIA
Cynthia Chung
Apr 6
In part 1 of this series Fact Checking the Fact Checkers, the question
was posed “why does Ukraine seem to have so many Nazis nowadays?” In
that paper we were led to the further question “is the United States
and possibly NATO involved in the funding, training and political
support of neo-Nazism in Ukraine and if so, for what purpose?” It was
concluded that in order to answer such questions fully, we would have
to look at the historical root of Ukrainian nationalism and its
relationship with U.S. Intelligence and NATO post-WWII. It is here
that we will resume.
https://thenakedhedgie.com/
The “Three Block” global agenda today and the role of finance (part 3 of 3)
December 19, 2021Alex KrainerEmpire, Eurasia, Geopolitics, Politics,
Russia 5 Comments
This is part 3 of a 3-part series shedding light on the role of
British secret diplomacy in the run-up to World War 2. This article
looks at the role of finance in shaping the new global order, still
based on the same three-block world agenda. Here are the links to Part
1, Part 2 and the 46 min. video report on YouTube, which covers all
three parts.
https://isystem-tf.com/
4b Boulevard de Belgique
Monte Carlo, 98000
Monaco
xela.reniark@gmail.com
+33 678 63 90 57
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Joly, Mélanie - M.P." <Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 19:20:47 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Prime Minister Viktor Orbán should
consider matters carefully before jumpng in bed with Biden like
Sweden, Finland and you obiously are N'esy Pas Madame Joly???
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Bonjour,
Nous accusons réception de votre courriel et vous remercions d'avoir
pris le temps de nous écrire.
Veuillez noter que nous recevons actuellement un volume élevé de
courriels. Veuillez prévoir un délai dans nos réponses.
Pour toute demande de renseignements concernant le Département des
affaires étrangères, veuillez envoyer votre courriel à
melanie.joly@international.gc.
Sincèrement,
L'équipe de circonscription de l'honorable Mélanie Joly,
Députée d'Ahuntsic-Cartierville.
***
Hello,
We acknowledge receipt of your email and thank you for taking the time to write.
Please note that we are currently receiving a high volume of emails.
This may mean a delay in our responding to you.
For any inquiries related to the Department of Foreign Affairs, please
send your email to
melanie.joly@international.gc.
Sincerely,
The constituency team of the Honourable Mélanie Joly,
Member of Parliament for Ahuntsic-Cartierville
BTW I wonder if former Premier Gallant noticed that the Swedes finally
took down the evil Encyclopedia Dramatica website about us recently???
https://www.reddit.com/r/
Posted by
u/23237261588859226515
/pol/itician
8 years ago
4Chan Sweden
i.imgur.com/0sgKqQ...
nsfw
2112
comments
View all comments
User avatar
level 1
Evil_white_oppressor
·
8 yr. ago
/pol/itician
I can't wait to see what the history books will say about Sweden.
7
User avatar
level 2
Quiet-Ad-6501
ME TOO
http://davidraymondamos3.
However This one is still up and running after 7 long years
https://www.reddit.com/r/
Posted by
u/Drakon519
New Brunswick
7 years ago
This is a independent candidate in my riding
i.imgur.com/ctjWSt...
r/canada - This is a independent candidate in my riding
5555
comments
User avatar
level 1
Drakon519
Op ·
7 yr. ago
New Brunswick
His name is David Amos. I can imagine him in parliament now screaming
"THIS BILL SHALL NOT PASS!"
84
User avatar
level 2
Quiet-Ad-6501
·
just now
HMMMM
http://davidraymondamos3.
Saturday, 1 October 2016
RE Mean Old Me versus A TROLL calling himself Don Johnson and his
Defective Detective Agency and Encyclopedia Dramatica
---------- Original message ----------
From: Ian Naylor
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 20:36:03 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re The RCMP Federal Court File No T-1557-15
A Troll "Don Johnson" versus Encyclopedia Dramatica and Morgan
Johansson the Minister of Justice of Sweden and his International
cohorts
To: David Amos
I will be out of the office starting Septembe 28th. I expect to be
out for 4 - 6 weeks. In my absence you can contact D/Chief Dwayne
Pike, dpike@amherst.ca
---------- Original message ----------
From: Don Johnson
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 18:26:54 +0000
Subject: Encyclopedia Dramatica
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"
https://encyclopediadramatica.
David Raymond Amos - Encyclopedia Dramatica
encyclopediadramatica.se
David Raymond Amos AKA Gandalf The Kray-zay (born 1600 A.D.) is an
old-ass troll from way, wayyyy back in the pen and paper days of
trolling; writing to ...
I work with a conglomerate of Good People who want Encyclopedia
Dramatica shutdown. Investigating this site I came across your page.
Your information is quite difficult to read through and I was
wondering if you were interested in a couple of questions and if your
answers lead to something we can use I would happy to throw you some
bitcoin your way as the people I have had the pleasure of being
connected with have thrown 400,000 bitcoin into a pool to be realeased
to the individual who proved the most useful in taking down the site.
I can not release any information about my clients due to how
malicious these individuals can be but I can send you a link to
collect your share of the bitcoin if our information is useful in
acquiring the 400,000 bitcoin.
I guess my first question would be to ask if you know who wrote the
encyclopedia article?
I can't imagine your difficulty running a political campaign with
such a disgraceful site linking itself to you.
Don Johnson
Lead Investigator
Don Johnson
Head Detective
Don Johnson Detective agency
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)"
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 20:35:33 +0000
Subject: RE: Re The RCMP Federal Court File No T-1557-15 A Troll "Don
Johnson" versus Encyclopedia Dramatica and Morgan Johansson the
Minister of Justice of Sweden and his International cohorts
To: David Amos
Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick.
Please be assured that your email has been received, will be reviewed,
and a response will be forthcoming.
Once again, thank you for taking the time to write.
Merci d'avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du Nouveau-Brunswick.
Soyez assuré que votre courriel a bien été reçu, qu'il sera examiné
et qu'une réponse vous sera acheminée.
Merci encore d'avoir pris de temps de nous écrire.
Sincerely, / Sincèrement,
Correspondence Manager / Gestionnaire de la correspondance
Office of the Premier / Cabinet du premier ministre
https://davidraymondamos3.
Saturday, 23 April 2016
This should put the fancy knickers of Georgey Boy Osborne, Davey Baby
Cameron, the evil old lawyer Jean Chretien and all his partners in the
Dentons law firm in quite a knot N'esy Pas?
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 16:04:45 -0400
Subject: Hey Georgey Boy Osborne Obviously the evil old lawyer Jean
Chretien, his law firm Dentons, the CROWN Corp commonly known as the
CBC and everybody else knows that you and your boss David Cameron are
way past too late to pretend to be ethical now.
To: ju.registrator@gov.se, ju.birs@gov.se, "Gilles.Moreau"
<Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
cps <cps@calgarypolice.ca>, "Paul.Lynch"
<Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>, investigations <investigations@cbc.ca>,
newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, news <news@hilltimes.com>,
news-tips <news-tips@nytimes.com>, "ed.pilkington"
<ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>
"george.osborne.mp" <george.osborne.mp@parliament.
<George.Soros@
Cc: "Jean.Chretien" <Jean.Chretien@dentons.com>, David Amos
<myson333@yahoo.com>, birgittaj <birgittaj@althingi.is>, birgittajoy
<birgittajoy@gmail.com>, smari <smari@immi.is>, RBauer
<RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>
---------- Original message ----------
From: Investigations Investigations <investigations@cbc.ca>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 12:57:26 -0700
Subject: Thank you for your email Re: ATTN Minister for Justice Morgan
Johansson Imagine if you saw this LIBEL published about YOU on a
Swedish website???
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for sending your story idea to the CBC's Investigative Unit.
We appreciate your interest and will read your suggestions. If we
move forward with your idea we will be in touch.
Thanks again for contacting us.
The investigative team.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "OSBORNE, George" <george.osborne.mp@parliament.
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 19:57:29 +0000
Subject: Thank you for your e-mail
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Rt Hon George Osborne MP
Thank you for your email. This is an automated response.
If you are contacting George Osborne in his capacity as Chancellor of
the Exchequer, please re-send your email to
public.enquiries@hmtreasury.
Alternatively, write to: The Correspondence & Enquiry Unit, HM
Treasury, 1 Horseguards Road, London, SW1A 2HQ or telephone 020 7270
5000.
If you are a resident of the Tatton constituency, please ensure that
you have included your full postal address and postcode so that we can
identify you as a constituent. We receive a large volume of emails
every day and will reply to your message as soon as possible.
The Tatton Office, which is for constituents only, can be reached on
01565 873 037. If you are unsure whether George Osborne is your MP,
you can check by using this utility: http://findyourmp.parliament.
If you are a personal contact, your e-mail will be forwarded to Mr
Osborne accordingly.
Office of the Rt Hon George Osborne MP
First Secretary of State & Chancellor of the Exchequer
Member of Parliament for Tatton
UK Parliament Disclaimer: This e-mail is confidential to the intended
recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or
copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses,
but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus
transmitted by this e-mail. This e-mail address is not secure, is not
encrypted and should not be used for sensitive data.
On 4/23/16, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> Trust that I will try to call your office on Monday
>
> Please check my first email to you today. If you wish to ignore my
> concerns, can you think of any reason why I should not sue YOU and
> Sweden in the USA???
>
> U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder meets Sweden Minister for Justice
> Beatrice Ask. In a recent speech, Holder pressed for Sweden’s
> continued collaboration in the struggle for inclusion and equality.
>
> Read more:
> http://iipdigital.usembassy.
>
>
> http://www.government.se/
>
> Morgan Johansson
> Minister for Justice and Migration
> Phone +46 8 405 10 00 (Switchboard)
> email ju.registrator@gov.se
>
> David Raymond Amos
>
> https://encyclopediadramatica.
>
> "David Raymond Amos AKA Gandalf The Kray-zay (born 1600 A.D.) is an
> old-ass troll from way, wayyyy back in the pen and paper days of
> trolling; writing to various authority figures and officials in Canada
> and The United States about shit nobody cares about. Now that he has
> upgraded to the internet, he is a constant fucking nuisance to
> everyone in existence who just happen to get their e-mail address
> collected by this sick loony fuck. Everyone from Stephen Harper, to
> the RCMP, to Justin Trudeau has added David Amos's e-mail address to
> the block list. David contacts them for various transgressions ranging
> from a conspiracy involving slaughtered cows being killed by vampires
> to a shitty racist old geezer's blog because he said mean things about
> him. (No really!) The many lengthy e-mails he sends are filled with
> various idiosyncrasies ranging from saying "HOKA HAY" to calling
> everybody by some odd pet name. For example: John Smith would be
> "Johnny-Baby Smith." Clearly the thought process of an unmedicated
> retard. Google his phone number: (because he just LOVES posting that
> the fucking idiot) 1-902-800-0369 and see the number of people
> complaining about being crank called by this fucking moron. It's
> hilarious."
>
> David Amos In A Televised Fundy Royal Debate
>
> "Stand in awe of this sketchy motherfucker; as what looks like a
> homeless drifter just walked into a Fundy Royal debate and just
> started talking at a podium. This complete nutcase actually ran as an
> Independent during a Federal Election in New Brunswick. The looks on
> the faces of those candidates is priceless as you can clearly see them
> trying not to laugh or even address the elephant in the room: the fact
> that Gandalf from Lord of the Rings is running in a serious election."
>
> The Musical PWNage of David Raymond AmosHere's a musical tribute to
> this fucking retard.
>
> An Example of This Guy's Fucking StupidityTaken directly from this
> crackhead's blog [The David Amos Rant]:
>
> FW Methinks Harper, his lawyer Hamilton, Duffy and his lawyers, the
> RCMP, Mulcair and Trudeau the Younger should sit and pay attention
> ASAP what say you now Ministers MacKay and Blaney
>
> His Delusional Litigation David Amos has created another elaborate and
> imaginary construct to pathetically attempt to self-aggrandize
> himself. This following "document" is NOT a law suit. These are NOT
> the papers that would constitute a petition to the Federal Court of
> Canada. A check of the Federal Court of Canada Data base shows NO
> petition by a David Raymond Amos ever been filed. A check of the
> Federal Court of Canada shows file T-1557-15... DOES NOT EXIST.
> Edmonton Law Enforcement authorities also checked with the Federal
> Court and NO SUCH petition exists. The so-called documents and stamp
> are available at Staples and Office Depot. David Amos' imaginary
> petition to the court isn't even coherent or written as a lawyer
> would. Even the picture of the Harley motorcycle on his Twitter page
> does NOT exist anywhere but within the confines of David's deluded
> mind. Several years ago, his bike was seized by police because of
> being uninsured and auctioned off. David Amos' litigation is asking
> for 11 million dollars. David Amos' vital organs aren't worth $11
> million dollars.
>
> That begs the question: Do these fake documents constitute the CC of C
> offense...uttering false documents?
>
>
> David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15
>
> External Links David Amos
> DavidRayAmos
> David Raymond Amos
> David Raymond Amos Round 3
> E-mail address: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 900 0369
>
> ______________________________
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 15:48:46 -0400
> Subject: ATTN Morgan Johansson Minister for Justice and Migration for
> Sweden please have your lawyers study this email and the documents
> hereto attached closely
> To: ju.registrator@gov.se, ju.birs@gov.se
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> http://www.government.se/
>
> Morgan Johansson
> Minister for Justice and Migration
> Phone +46 8 405 10 00 (Switchboard)
> email ju.registrator@gov.se
>
> . To Morgan Johansson via senior registry clerk
> . In principle, all post and email sent to the Government and
> Government Offices are public documents. This means that the general
> public and mass media are entitled to demand access to the contents.
>
> Central Authority
> Ministry of Justice
> Phone 0046-8-405 10 00 (Switchboard),
> 0046-8-405 45 00 (Office)
> Fax 0046-8-405 46 76
> Visiting address Jakobsgatan 24
> Address 103 33 Stockholm
> Email ju.birs@gov.se
> ______________________________
>
> . In principle, all post and email sent to the Government and
> Government Offices are public documents. This means that the general
> public and mass media are entitled to demand access to the contents.
>
>
>
> . To Morgan Johansson via senior registry clerk
> . In principle, all post and email sent to the Government and
> Government Offices are public documents. This means that the general
> public and mass media are entitled to demand access to the contents.
>
> Central Authority
> Ministry of Justice
> Phone 0046-8-405 10 00 (Switchboard),
> 0046-8-405 45 00 (Office)
> Fax 0046-8-405 46 76
> Visiting address Jakobsgatan 24
> Address 103 33 Stockholm
> Email ju.birs@gov.se
> ______________________________
>
> . In principle, all post and email sent to the Government and
> Government Offices are public documents. This means that the general
> public and mass media are entitled to demand access to the contents.
>
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 19:15:48 +0000
Subject: RE: I just called again correct Thomas Sartory and Martin Fantozzi???
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.
If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.
Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.
Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
pour examen et considération.
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144 or by email
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 19:16:39 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: I just called again correct Thomas Sartory
and Martin Fantozzi???
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for reaching out to Ontario Premier Doug Ford.
As you may know, Writs of Election were issued on May 4, 2022, which
signals that the campaign period has begun. This means the Ontario
government has entered caretaker mode until the completion of the next
general election on June 2, 2022.
In certain instances, your inquiry will be forwarded to the
appropriate government official for review but please note that
responses may be deferred.
Rest assured that all correspondence is carefully read and given
proper consideration.
Thank you again for writing.
______
Merci d’avoir contacté le premier ministre de l’Ontario, Doug Ford.
Comme vous le savez sans doute, un décret de convocation des électeurs
et électrices à une élection provinciale a été émis le 4 mai 2022,
marquant le début de la campagne électorale. Par conséquent, le
gouvernement de l’Ontario est entré dans une période de transition
jusqu’à la tenue des prochaines élections générales, le 2 juin 2022.
Votre demande sera transmise à un représentant du gouvernement aux
fins d’examen. Toutefois, veuillez noter que dans certains cas, il
pourrait y avoir un délai avant qu’une réponse ne vous soit acheminée.
Soyez assurés que toutes les correspondances que nous recevons sont
lues et traitées attentivement. Nous vous remercions de nous avoir
écrit.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 16:13:27 -0300
Subject: I just called again correct Thomas Sartory and Martin Fantozzi???
To: tsartory@goulstonstorrs.com, mfantozzi@goulstonstorrs.com,
jantwi@goulstonstorrs.com, david.brown@goulstonstorrs.com
david.lewis@goulstonstorrs.com
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
premier <premier@ontario.ca>, oig <oig@sec.gov>, "dean.buzza"
<dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
https://www.goulstonstorrs.
Martin M. Fantozzi
Director
mfantozzi@goulstonstorrs.com
Boston
+1 617 574 3510
https://www.goulstonstorrs.
Joel E. Antwi
Associate
jantwi@goulstonstorrs.com
Washington, D.C.
+1 617 574 0585
Joel Antwi is an associate in the firm’s Litigation Group. Joel
handles disputes involving intellectual property, employment, real
estate, and professional liability. He represents individuals, owners,
trustees, and other fiduciaries, as well as a broad range of corporate
entities.
Prior to joining Goulston & Storrs, Joel was an associate at a
nationally recognized law firm, where he practiced commercial
litigation. While in law school, Joel served as a summer law clerk for
the United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs, during which time he worked on Congressional
investigations into the IRS, FCC, and Department of Veterans Affairs.
Before pursuing a legal career, Joel was a high school teacher through
Teach For America, and interned for then-Senate Majority Leader Harry
Reid and Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman.
Joel received his J.D. and LL.M. from Boston University School of Law,
his M.Ed. from the University of Nevada, and his B.A. from American
University.
David W. Brown
Associate
+1 202 721 1141
david.brown@goulstonstorrs.com
David Brown is a real estate lawyer who focuses his practice on
acquisitions, dispositions, recapitalizations and mortgage financings.
He also has experience counseling clients in tax credit financing
transactions. David represents commercial investors, developers,
lenders, and property owners in a broad range of complex real estate
matters across the United States.
Clients also turn to David for his practical analysis of legislative
and regulatory activities in the real estate industry, with a
particular emphasis on the District of Columbia. Moreover, as a member
of the firm’s College Sports Law Practice, he has used his legislative
interest to remain apprised of the constantly evolving intellectual
property law landscape in the college sports arena, concentrating on
name, image and likeness issues, in order to advise universities on
compliance matters.
Prior to pursuing his legal career, David was a teacher and an
award-winning broadcast journalist in Jamaica. He also worked in a
senior communications and advisory capacity at the then Ministry of
Transport, Works and Housing. As a law student at The George
Washington University Law School, David interned at the DC Rental
Housing Commission and received White House recognition for his pro
bono work. While there, he also served as a Dean’s Writing Fellow and
as Executive Managing Editor of the American Intellectual Property Law
Association Quarterly Journal.
Before joining Goulston & Storrs, David worked as a real estate
associate in the District of Columbia office of an Am Law 100 firm.
David A. Lewis
Associate
+1 202 721 1127
david.lewis@goulstonstorrs.com
Dave Lewis is a real estate attorney who focuses his practice in
commercial real estate developments and transactional matters. He
assists clients in the development of mixed-use, multi-family, retail,
office, hospitality, renewable energy and professional sports projects
in Washington, D.C. and other major urban markets nationwide.
In his transactional practice, Dave works with large institutional
clients, including national REITs acquiring and developing properties
in large urban markets. He also handles leasing matters for retail and
office properties. Dave is an advisor on a range of topics related to
shopping center and multifamily development, often serving as local
counsel for both buyers and sellers of commercial properties.
For his land use clients, Dave handles a broad range of entitlement,
zoning, permitting, development and historic preservation for projects
across the District of Columbia. Dave represents clients of all sizes
in front of regulatory and governing agencies in the District,
including the Zoning Commission, the Board of Zoning Adjustment, the
Historic Preservation Review Board, National Capital Planning
Commission, and the Commission of Fine Arts, as well as a range of
neighborhood and community organizations.
Dave has significant experience handling complex negotiations,
resolving conflicts, and drafting easements and other documents
between his clients and abutting property owners, utility companies,
and government agencies involving all aspects of real estate
development.
Dave is a member of the firm’s Climate Change Task Force and plays a
leadership role in the D.C. Chapter of the Harvard Real Estate Alumni
Organization.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 15:45:06 -0400
Subject: ATTN Alan Reisch, Richard Rosensweig and David Coombs RE
Thomas J. Sartory et al
To: areisch@goulstonstorrs.com, rrosensweig@goulstonstorrs.com
dcoombs@goulstonstorrs.com
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
David L. Coombs
Director
dcoombs@goulstonstorrs.com
Boston
+1 617 574 3563
Richard J. Rosensweig
Director
rrosensweig@goulstonstorrs.com
Boston
+1 617 574 3588
Alan M. Reisch
Of Counsel
areisch@goulstonstorrs.com
Boston
+1 617 574 3547
http://davidraymondamos3.
Tuesday, 19 December 2017
RE: THE WARNING Perhaps you should review my documents and Frontline's
response to me then mention my name to your boss Michael Sullivan?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Sartory, Thomas J." <TSartory@goulstonstorrs.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 07:41:20 -0500
Subject: RE: I did talk the lawyers Golub and Flumenbaum tried to
discuss Bernie Madoff and KPMG etc before sending these emails
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Dear Mr. Amos,
I am General Counsel at Goulston & Storrs. Your email below to
Messers. Rosensweig and Reisch has been forwarded to me for response.
While it's not clear what type of assistance, if any, you seek from
Goulston % Storrs, please be advised that we are not in a position to
help you. Please do not send further communications to any of our
attorneys. We will not be able to respond, and your communications
will not be protected by the attorney-client privilege.
We wish you well in the pursuit of your concerns.
Sincerely,
Thomas J. Sartory
Thomas J Sartory
Goulston & Storrs
400 Atlantic Ave
Boston, MA 02110-3331
Office: 617-482-1776
Cell: 617-482-1776
Fax: 617-574-7632
Email: tsartory@goulstonstorrs.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 10:41:29 -0300
Subject: YO Marco Mendicino Methinks Franky Boy McKenna and Petey Baby
MacKay understand why I am laughing at all the lawyers and the RCMP
today Nesy Pas?
To: "Marco.Mendicino" <Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>,
internalaffairs@pd.boston.gov, mediarelations@pd.boston.gov,
"dean.buzza" <dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, william.weinreb@usdoj.gov,
"Candice.Bergen" <Candice.Bergen@parl.gc.ca>, Joel.Garland@ci.irs.gov,
"Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, jtodd@toddweld.com,
hcooper@toddweld.com, "pierre.poilievre"
<pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, "Chrystia.Freeland"
<Chrystia.Freeland@parl.gc.ca>
"hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "Bill.Hogan"
<Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>, "ian.fahie" <ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Melanie.Joly"
<Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca>, "Greta.Bossenmaier"
<Greta.Bossenmaier@hq.nato.int
Viva Frei <david@vivafrei.com>, "Frank.McKenna"
<Frank.McKenna@td.com>, peter.mackay@mcinnescooper.com
mla@esmithmccrossinmla.com, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>,
mscott@cumberlandcounty.ns.ca, rglangille <rglangille@gmail.com>,
premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, sheilagunnreid
<sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, Christopher Scott
<chris.scott@
<kingpatrick278@gmail.com>, "freedomreport.ca"
<freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca,
"stefanos.karatopis" <stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com>
<bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
premier <premier@ontario.ca>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.
<fin.minfinance-financemin.
http://www.archive.org/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
"Just Dave" pissed off
927 views
Jun 8, 2008
David Amos
45 subscribers
http://www.checktheevidence.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
RCMP Sussex New Brunswick
2,429 views
Apr 5, 2013
David Amos
January 30, 2007
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Mr. David Amos
Dear Mr. Amos:
This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
Graham of the RCMP °J" Division in Fredericton.
Sincerely,
Honourable Michael B. Murphy
Minister of Health
CM/cb
CLEARLY THE RCMP/GRC AND THE KPMG PALS DO NOT KNOW
HOW TO READ LET ALONE COUNT BEANS EH?
Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,
John.Foran@gnb.ca, Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,
"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
"Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have n
Dear Mr. Amos,
Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada and
the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
Sincerely,
Warren McBeath, Cpl.
GRC Caledonia RCMP
Traffic Services NCO
Ph: (506) 387-2222
Fax: (506) 387-4622
E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
RCMP surprised by New Brunswick's concerns about top cop
Letter says Mountie HQ wasn’t told of problems before cabinet minister
Ted Flemming triggered removal
Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Apr 27, 2022 6:00 AM AT
RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki was caught by surprise by New
Brunswick's push to remove the head of J Division in 2021, according
to a letter she wrote to the province's public safety minister.
(Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)
The head of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police was caught by surprise
last year when the Higgs government asked for the removal of the head
of the force's J Division in New Brunswick.
Commissioner Brenda Lucki told the province's public safety minister
it was "unfortunate" that no one told her or her senior management
team that they had "concerns" about assistant commissioner Larry
Tremblay.
"There may have been an opportunity to proactively address some of the
issues you've raised," Lucki wrote to then-minister Ted Flemming in a
July 29, 2021 letter obtained by CBC News.
Flemming had written to Lucki two weeks earlier, invoking a section of
the province's policing contract with the RCMP that allowed him to ask
the force to replace Tremblay.
Ted Flemming was public safety minister when New Brunswick pushed for
the removal of Larry Tremblay as assistant commissioner of the RCMP's
J Division. (Joe McDonald/CBC)
"I do not invoke article 7.4 lightly, and I regret that it has become
necessary," Flemming wrote in his July 15 letter.
That section says the minister can request a replacement if the
commissioner is convinced "sufficient cause" exists that the head of J
division "no longer commands the confidence" of the provincial
government.
Flemming's letter opened by saying "as you are aware," Tremblay "no
longer commands my confidence" to act on drug crime and be accountable
to local communities.
In her response, Lucki said "neither I, nor my management, were aware
of any concerns" about Tremblay before Flemming's letter.
Mobile users: View the document
(PDF KB)
(Text KB)CBC is not responsible for 3rd party content
The Department of Public Safety turned down an interview request
Tuesday. "We have no additional comment on this matter," said
spokesperson Geoffrey Downey.
Lucki's letter said she hoped the RCMP could work with the province to
reach "a positive resolution that will ensure all parties involved are
treated with respect and dignity" without having to invoke Article
7.4.
When CBC first revealed Tremblay's removal last year, J Division
spokesperson Angela Chang claimed Article 7.4 hadn't been invoked and
Tremblay made a "personal decision" to retire at the end of October.
Chang later withdraw the assertion the article hadn't been invoked.
Higgs government forced out head of New Brunswick RCMP, letter reveals
Opposition parties denounce government ousting of N.B.'s top RCMP officer
The RCMP rejected an interview request Tuesday. Spokesperson Robin
Percival repeated that Tremblay had made a personal decision to retire
effective Oct. 31, 2021.
CBC News obtained Lucki's letter to Flemming this week through an
access to information request to the RCMP.
In his letter to Lucki, Flemming complained that Tremblay did not help
the Higgs government "drive significant change" in policing,
especially on drug crime.
The minister said in an interview last October that J Division was
"not having the kind of leadership that we felt we needed" and the
situation was "out of control."
He said the province wanted to "declare war" on drug dealers.
Tremblay was removed from the job in J Division last year after a
request from the province. (Ed Hunter/CBC)
Opposition Liberal MLA Rob McKee says Flemming often speaks about the
independence of the justice and policing system but his decision to
push out Tremblay "demonstrated just the opposite."
"The fact that now it's coming back that he did not even raise
concerns with them is even more concerning," McKee said.
"I think this shows that after the fact, Lucki is saying that she felt
due process wasn't respected in this case."
The province provided an extra $2.3 million for J Division's crime
reduction unit last year to try to reduce drug crime, part of a five
year addiction and mental health action plan.
This year's budget added another $3.3 million.
Tremblay was named assistant commissioner of the RCMP for New Brunswick in 2016.
Three days after CBC News revealed Flemming's push to remove him, the
RCMP said it had decided "to not proceed" with appointing Chief
Superintendent Kevin Leahy, head of the Parliamentary Protective
Service in Ottawa, as his replacement.
Carleton MLA Bill Hogan took over the role of public safety minister
in the Higgs cabinet earlier this year, assuming the role held by Ted
Flemming, who remains justice minister and attorney-general. (Jacques
Poitras/CBC)
In January, DeAnna Hill was put in the assistant commissioner's job instead.
Flemming himself was later replaced in the role of public safety minister.
Premier Blaine Higgs shuffled Carleton MLA Bill Hogan into the
position in February, saying it would help "ramp up our intensity" in
fighting drug crime.
He said it wasn't a reflection on Flemming, who remains attorney
general and justice minister.
"I don't think it's a case of Minister Flemming not being able to
continue," Higgs said. "I think it's a situation where we're putting
an emphasis on public safety and rural communities and communities
throughout our province that have continued to face crime issues."
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Jacques Poitras
Provincial Affairs reporter
Jacques Poitras has been CBC's provincial affairs reporter in New
Brunswick since 2000. Raised in Moncton, he also produces the CBC
political podcast Spin Reduxit.
With files from Catharine Tunney
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
>>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:53:11 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Emails to Department of Justice and
>>> Province of Nova Scotia
>>> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
>>> of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
>>>
>>> This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
>>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
>>> may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
>>> message will be carefully reviewed.
>>>
>>> To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
>>> the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
>>>
>>> Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
>>> Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the
>>> Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future
>>> correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write
>>> directly to the Department of Justice at
>>> mcu@justice.gc.ca<mailto:mcu@
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>>
>>> -------------------
>>>
>>> Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
>>> Vancouver Granville.
>>>
>>> Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
>>> courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
>>> correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
>>> votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
>>>
>>> Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
>>> veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
>>> votre adresse et votre code postal.
>>>
>>> Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
>>> la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
>>> d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
>>> Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
>>> Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
>>> mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.
>>>
>>> Merci
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
>>> <fin.minfinance-financemin.
>>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:53:17 +0000
>>> Subject: RE: Re Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova
>>> Scotia
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
>>> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
>>> comments.
>>>
>>> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
>>> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
>>> commentaires.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
>>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:53:16 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Emails to Department of Justice and
>>> Province of Nova Scotia
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>>>
>>> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
>>> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
>>> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
>>>
>>> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
>>> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
>>>
>>> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>>>
>>> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
>>> press releases.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 12:53:03 -0400
>>> Subject: Re Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>>> To: wrscott@nbpower.com, "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
>>> "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"
>>> <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, krisaustin <krisaustin@peoplesalliance.ca
>>> "rick.doucet" <rick.doucet@gnb.ca>, "Sollows, David (ERD/DER)"
>>> <david.sollows@gnb.ca>, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
>>> "robert.gauvin" <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca,
>>> "Bill.Fraser" <Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca>, "John.Ames" <John.Ames@gnb.ca>,
>>> gerry.lowe@gnb.ca, "hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>,
>>> michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, "art.odonnell" <art.odonnell@nb.aibn.com>,
>>> "jake.stewart" <jake.stewart@gnb.ca>, mike.holland@gnb.ca, votejohnw
>>> <votejohnw@gmail.com>, andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca,
>>> greg.thompson2@gnb.ca, jean-claude.d'amours@gnb.ca,
>>> jacques.j.leblanc@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, keith.chiasson@gnb.ca,
>>> "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, robert.mckee@gnb.ca,
>>> rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy"
>>> <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, gphlaw@nb.aibn.com, wharrison
>>> <wharrison@nbpower.com>, "Furey, John" <jfurey@nbpower.com>,
>>> "Jody.Wilson-Raybould" <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
>>> "clare.barry" <clare.barry@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
>>> "hon.ralph.goodale" <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>,
>>> "Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc" <Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca
>>> <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>,
>>> JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca, LauraLee.Langley@novascotia.ca
>>> Karen.Hudson@novascotia.ca, Joanne.Munro@novascotia.ca, Newsroom
>>> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, news
>>> <news@dailygleaner.com>
>>> Cc: "David.Raymond.Amos" <David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com>
>>> <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Victoria.Zinck@novascotia.ca,
>>> Kim.Fleming@novascotia.ca
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: "McGrath, Stephen T" <Stephen.McGrath@novascotia.ca
>>> Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 12:40:22 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Does anyone recall the email entitled "So
>>> Stephen McGrath if not you then just exactly who sent me this latest
>>> email from your office?"
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Thanks for your message, however I am no longer at the Department of
>>> Justice, and this email account is not being monitored.
>>>
>>> Please contact Kim Fleming at Kim.Fleming@novascotia.ca (phone
>>> 902-424-4023), or Vicky Zinck at Victoria.Zinck@novascotia.ca (phone
>>> 902-424-4390). Kim and Vicky will be able to redirect you.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos,
>>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>>> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
>>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>>
>>> Department of Justice
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 15:16:38 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Laura Lee Langley, Karen Hudson and Joanne Munro I just
>>> called all three of your offices to inform you of my next lawsuit
>>> against Nova Scotia
>>> To: LauraLee.Langley@novascotia.ca
>>> Joanne.Munro@novascotia.ca
>>> Cc: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> https://novascotia.ca/exec_
>>>
>>> https://novascotia.ca/exec_
>>>
>>> Laura Lee Langley
>>> 1700 Granville Street, 5th Floor
>>> One Government Place
>>> Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 1X5
>>> Phone: (902) 424-8940
>>> Fax: (902) 424-0667
>>> Email: LauraLee.Langley@novascotia.ca
>>>
>>> https://novascotia.ca/just/
>>>
>>> Karen Hudson Q.C.
>>> 1690 Hollis Street, 7th Floor
>>> Joseph Howe Building
>>> Halifax, NS B3J 3J9
>>> Phone: (902) 424-4223
>>> Fax: (902) 424-0510
>>> Email: Karen.Hudson@novascotia.ca
>>>
>>> https://novascotia.ca/sns/ceo.
>>>
>>> Joanne Munro:
>>> 1505 Barrington Street, 14-South
>>> Maritime Centre
>>> Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3K5
>>> Phone: (902) 424-4089
>>> Fax: (902) 424-5510
>>> Email: Joanne.Munro@novascotia.ca
>>>
>>> If you don't wish to speak to me before I begin litigation then I
>>> suspect the Integrity Commissioner New Brunswick or the Federal Crown
>>> Counsel can explain the email below and the documents hereto attached
>>> to you and your Premier etc.
>>>
>>> Veritas Vincit
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>> 902 800 0369
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Good Day Sir
>>>
>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>
>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>
>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>
>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>
>>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>>
>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>>
>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>
>>>
>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>
>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>>
>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>
>>> Date: 20151223
>>>
>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>
>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>
>>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>>
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>
>>> Plaintiff
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>
>>> Defendant
>>>
>>> ORDER
>>>
>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>
>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>> in its entirety.
>>>
>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>>> he stated:
>>>
>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>
>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>> Police.
>>>
>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>
>>>
>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>
>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>> Judge
>>>
>>>
>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>
>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>
>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>> most
>>>
>>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>>
>>> 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>
>>> January 13, 2015
>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>
>>> December 8, 2014
>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>
>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau?
>>>
>>>
>>> Vertias Vincit
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>> 902 800 0369
>>>
>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>
>>> Subject:
>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>
>>> January 30, 2007
>>>
>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>
>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>
>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>
>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>> Minister of Health
>>>
>>> CM/cb
>>>
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>
>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>
>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>
>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>
>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>
>>>
>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>> United States Senate
>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>
>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>> raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that
>>> these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in
>>> contact
>>> with you about this previously.
>>>
>>> Very truly yours,
>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Lametti, David - M.P." <David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 21:08:18 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) Office of Inspector General cannot perform SEC operating
responsibilities, such as investigation of alleged securities law
violations.
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Bonjour,
Merci d'avoir communiqué avec le bureau de circonscription de
l'honorable David Lametti, député de LaSalle-Émard-Verdun. Ceci est un
message automatisé confirmant que nous recevons votre courriel.
Afin de recevoir une réponse dans les meilleurs délais, assurez-vous
d'inclure votre nom au complet, votre adresse résidentielle et votre
code postal dans tous les courriels. Toutes les correspondances sont
lues et examinées, mais nous ne répondrons qu’aux correspondances
provenant de LaSalle-Émard-Verdun.
Si vous désirez contacter le bureau du Ministre de la Justice et
procureur général du Canada, veuillez adresser votre correspondance à
: mcu@justice.gc.ca<mailto:mcu@
Pour obtenir les dernières informations, suivre les développements,
connaître les nouvelles mesures et les dernières directives concernant
la COVID-19, nous vous invitons à consulter les sites suivants :
Notre site-web : https://davidlametti.libparl.
Gouvernement du Canada :
https://www.canada.ca/fr/
Gouvernement du Québec :
https://www.quebec.ca/sante/
Santé publique de la ville de Montréal :
https://santemontreal.qc.ca/
Organisation mondiale de la santé:
https://www.who.int/fr/
Encore une fois, merci d'avoir contacté notre bureau.
Bureau de l'honorable David Lametti, C.P. député de LaSalle-Émard-Verdun
------
Good day,
Thank you for contacting the constituency office of the Honourable
David Lametti, Member of Parliament for LaSalle-Émard-Verdun. This is
an automated message to acknowledge that we have received your email.
In order to receive the most timely response, please be sure to
include your full name, home address and postal code on all emails.
All correspondence is read and reviewed, however only correspondence
from inside LaSalle-Émard-Verdun may receive a direct response.
If you wish to contact the Minister's office, please address your
correspondence to: mcu@justice.gc.ca<mailto:mcu@
To get the latest information, follow developments and/or learn about
new measures and directives concerning COVID-19, we invite you to
consult these links:
Our website : https://davidlametti.libparl.
Government of Canada :
https://www.canada.ca/en/
Government of Québec :
https://www.quebec.ca/en/
Public Health for the City de Montreal :
https://santemontreal.qc.ca/
World Health Organization:
https://www.who.int/
Once again, thank you for reaching out to our office.
Office of the Honourable David Lametti, P.C., M.P. LaSalle-Émard-Verdun
On 4/26/22, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> Perhaps the RCMP or the FBI o Trump or his buddies April LaJune and
> Roger Stone will explain to the Inspector General of the SEC and all
> Canadians why I am the guy the SEC dudes would not name who is the
> link to Madoff and Putnam Investments and why there are outstanding
> warants in the USA for my arrest since 2005
>
> Notice the transcript and webcast of the hearing of the US Senate
> Banking Commitee are still missing?
>
>
> https://www.banking.senate.
>
> Full Committee Hearing
> Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the
> Mutual Fund Industry
>
> Date: Thursday, November 20, 2003 Time: 02:00 PM
>
>
> Topic
> The Committee will meet in OPEN SESSION to conduct the second in a
> series of hearings on the “Review of Current Investigations and
> Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry.”
>
> Witness Panel 1
>
> Mr. Stephen M. Cutler
> Director - Division of Enforcement
> Securities and Exchange Commission
> Cutler - November 20, 2003
>
> Mr. Robert Glauber
> Chairman and CEO
> National Association of Securities Dealers
> Glauber - November 20, 2003
>
> Eliot Spitzer
> Attorney General
> State of New York
> Spitzer - November 20, 2003
>
>
>
> Notice Eliot Spitzer and the Dates around November 20th, 2003 in the
> following file
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.
>
> April LaJune and Roger Stone should listen to this and then try to
> call me a liar
>
> http: //www.archive.org/details/
>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 12:41:42 +0000
Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S SDNY
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.
If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.
Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.
Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
pour examen et considération.
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144 or by email
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.
On 4/27/22, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 17:26:22 -0400
> Subject: My calls to the Office of the Boston Police Commissioner
> William B. Evans
> To: internalaffairs@pd.boston.gov, mediarelations@pd.boston.gov
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, washington field
> <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:51:40 -0400
> Subject: A little Deja Vu for Susan Kantrowitz and her associates
> To: frontline@wgbh.org, web <web@wcvb.com>, "Marc.Litt"
> <Marc.Litt@bakermckenzie.com>, "PETER.MACKAY"
> <PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.
> Joel.Garland@ci.irs.gov, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
> jtodd@toddweld.com, hcooper@toddweld.com
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:28:20 -0300
> Subject: RE: THE WARNING Perhaps you should review my documents and
> Frontline's response to me then mention my name to your boss Michael
> Sullivan?
> To: diane_buxton@wgbh.org, Michael_Kirk@wgbh.org,
> lenbracken@hotmail.com, frontline@wgbh.org, Barry Winters
> sunrayzulu@shaw.ca, vanlop1@parl.gc.ca, coderd@parl.gc.ca>,
> Brookes.Merritt@assembly.ab.ca
> producer@onsecondthought.tv, danddbroadcasting@gmail.com,
> press@scsdma.org, info@scsdma.org, info@cabralforsheriff.com,
> info@ashcroftgroupllc.com, rfowlo@comcast.net,
> Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Cc: Michael_Sullivan@wgbh.org, Jim_Gilmore@wgbh.org,
> jgilmore@kirkdocumentary.com, Mike_Wiser@wgbh.org,
> foreigneditor@independent.co.
> foreign@stockmarket.gov.ua, danf@danf.net, jacques.poitras@cbc.ca,
> Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca, mcknight.Gisele@dailygleaner.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:18:06 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S
> SDNY
> To: diane_buxton@wgbh.org
> Cc: postur <postur@fjr.stjr.is>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 13:48:28 -0300
> Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S
> SDNY
> To: Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov, NesterJ@sec.gov, USANYS.MADOFF@usdoj.gov,
> Ministere-Finances@fi.etat.lu, Wendy.Olsen@usdoj.gov,
> vasilescua@sec.gov, friedmani@sec.gov, krishnamurthyp@sec.gov,
> "graham@grahamsteele.ca" <graham@grahamsteele.ca>, "jonathan.dean"
> <jonathan.dean@
> producer@onsecondthought.tv, dr_taitz@yahoo.com,
> drbilldeagle@earthlink.net
> Cc: oig@sec.gov, william.zabel@srz.com, dsheehan@bakerlaw.com,
> mhirchfield@bakerlaw.com, ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca, "t.j.burke@gnb.ca"
> <t.j.burke@gnb.ca>, "rick.hancox" <rick.hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca>, "Fred.
> Pretorius" <Fred.Pretorius@gov.yk.ca>, "Dean.Buzza"
> <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, vanlop1 <vanlop1@parl.gc.ca>,
> jwestbrook1@bloomberg.net, nathan.olivarezgiles@latimes.
> sherine.elmadany@latimes.com, sbodoni@bloomberg.net, "Andrew. Krystal"
> <Andrew.Krystal@rci.rogers.com
> <injusticecoalition@hotmail.
> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>
>
> What kind of strange game is the US Justice Dept and the SEC playing
> with me now Mr Litt? Rest assured I won't play it and many people know
> that I never would Even though the corporate media won't talk about my
> concerns about your actions, others certainly do.
>
> Here is just one example that still exists on the net. Even though
> Danny Boy Fitzgerald hates this mean old Maritimer, at least
> understands the meaning of the term Integrity and detests you people
> more. I am merely wondering how much longer his blog will exist. You
> know why EH T.J. Burke?
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>
> You dudes know as well as I that my concerns are far greater that mere
> matters of money and Bernie Madoff. Perhaps you should talk to your
> associates in the RCMP and the INTERPOL ASAP Clearly I am trying hard
> to make the whole world know about my concerns about the Feds' severe
> lack of integrity EH H. David Kotz?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: USANYS-MADOFF <USANYS.MADOFF@usdoj.gov>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 10:40:12 -0400
> Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 9:21 AM
> To: David Amos; USANYS-MADOFF; Litt, Marc (USANYS)
> Cc: webo; vasilescua@sec.gov; friedmani@sec.gov; krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
> Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>
> Thank you for your response.
>
> Wendy Olsen
> Victim Witness Coordinator
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:48 AM
> To: USANYS-MADOFF; Olsen, Wendy (USANYS); Litt, Marc (USANYS)
> Cc: webo; vasilescua@sec.gov; friedmani@sec.gov; krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
> Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>
> Ms Olsen
>
> Thank you for keeping me informed.
>
> Yes unseal all my emails with all their attachments immediately and
> make certain that the US Attorny's office finally practices full
> disclosurement as to who I am and what my concerns are as per the Rule
> of Law within a purported democracy.
>
> As you folks all well know I am not a shy man and I have done nothing
> wrong. It appears to me that bureacratic people only use the right to
> privacy of others when it suits their malicious ends in order to
> protect their butts from impreacment, litigation and prosecution.
>
> The people in the US Attorney's Office and the SEC etc are very well
> aware that I protested immediately to everyone I could think of when
> the instant I knew that my correspondences went under seal and Madoff
> pled guilty so quickly and yet another cover up involing my actions
> was under full steam. Everybody knows that.the US Government has been
> trying to keep my concerns about the rampant public corruption a
> secret for well over seven long years. However now that a lot of
> poeple and their countries in general are losing a lot of money people
> are beginning to remember just exactly who I am and what i did
> beginning over seven years ago..
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 506 756 8687
>
> P.S. For the record Obviously I pounced on these Yankee bastards as
> soon as the newsrag in Boston published this article on the web last
> night.
>
> http://www.bostonherald.com/
> ormat=&page=2&listingType=biz#
>
> Notice that Nester just like everyone else would not say my name? It
> is because my issues surrounding both Madoff and are NOT marketing
> timing They are as you all well know money laundering, fraud,
> forgery, perjury, securites fraud, tax fraud, Bank fraud, illegal
> wiretappping and Murder amongst other very serious crimes.
>
> "SEC spokesman John Nester dismissed similarities between Markopolos
> and Scannell's cases as "not a valid comparison."
>
> He said the SEC determined the market-timing by Putnam clients that
> Scannell reported didn't violate federal law. Nester said the SEC only
> acted after another tipster alleged undisclosed market-timing by some
> Putnam insiders.
>
> Scannell, now a crusader for SEC reforms, isn't surprised the agency
> is in hot water again.
>
> Noting that several top SEC officials have gone on to high-paying
> private-sector jobs, he believes hopes for future employment impact
> investigations. "It's a distinct disadvantage to make waves before you
> enter the private sector," Scannell said."
>
> --- On Mon, 3/30/09, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
> SDNY
> To: NesterJ@sec.gov, letterstoeditor@bostonherald.
> <oig@sec.gov>, Thunter@tribune.com, david@davidmyles.com,
> ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca, "Dan Fitzgerald" <danf@danf.net>
> Cc: dsheehan@bakerlaw.com, dspelfogel@bakerlaw.com,
> mc@whistleblowers.org, gkachroo@mccarter.com,
> david.straube@accenture.com, gurdip.s.sahota@accenture.com,
> benjamin_mcmurray@ao.uscourts.
> Date: Monday, March 30, 2009, 10:00 PM
>
> Need I say BULLSHIT?
>
> http://www.bostonherald.com/
> ormat=&page=2&listingType=biz#
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:03:13 -0300
> Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S
> OFFICE
> SDNY
> To: Russ.Stanton@latimes.com, meredith.goodman@latimes.com,
> ninkster@navigantconsulting.
> Cc: firstselectmanffld@town.
> editor@whatsupfairfield.com, info@csiworld.org, jacques_poitras
> <jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:40:55 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
> To: gmacnamara@town.fairfield.ct.
> "Paul. Harpelle" <Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca>, Jason Keenan
> <jason.keenan@icann.org>, Kandalaw <Kandalaw@mindspring.com>
> Cc: info@grahamdefense.org, fbinhct@leo.gov
>
> From: "Peck,Dave" <DPeck@town.fairfield.ct.us>
> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:32:32 -0400
> Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT
> INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> I will be unavailable until 4/1/09.
>
> Deputy Chief MacNamara will be in charge while I am away.
>
> He can be reached at 254-4831 or email him at
> gmacnamara@town.fairfield.ct.
>
> I will not be checking emails or cell phone messages.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Chief Dave Peck
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:32:18 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
> To: dpeck@town.fairfield.ct.us, edit@ctpost.com, bresee@courant.com
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:19:35 -0300
> Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
> To: dtnews@telegraph.co.uk
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: USANYS-MADOFF
> Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 3:06 PM
> To: DAVID.RAYMOND.AMOS@GMAIL.COM
> Subject: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>
> In United States v. Bernard L. Madoff, 09 Cr. 213 (DC), the Court
> received a request from NBC and ABC to unseal all correspondence from
> victims that has been submitted in connection with the case. This
> includes your email to the Government. If the correspondence from
> victims is unsealed, the victim's personal identifying information
> including name, address, telephone number and email address (to the
> extent it was included on the correspondence) will become public. The
> Government must submit a response to the request by NBC and ABC by
> Tuesday, March 31, 2009. Please let us know whether you consent to
> the full disclosure of your correspondence, or whether you wish to
> have your correspondence remain sealed for privacy or other reasons.
> If you wish to have your correspondence remain sealed, please let us
> know the reason. We will defend your privacy to the extent that we
> can. Thank you.
>
> I looks like the US attorney in New York finally has to unseal my
> emails that you dudes have been sitting on for quite some time for no
> reason I will ever understand other than you are just a bunch of
> chickenshits.
>
> I know NBC, ABC, your blogger buddies or any other media wacko will
> never say my name but the pissed off folks that lost a lot of money
> with Bernie Baby just may ask how the hell I am EH?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
>
>
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:48:50 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
> KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
> To: Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:29:42 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
> KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
> To: PChavkin@mintz.com
> Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)" <Wendy.Olsen@usdoj.gov>
> Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:08:04 -0400
> Subject: RE: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
> KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> On March 10, 2009, the Honorable Denny Chin provided the following
> guidance for victims who wish to be heard at the plea proceeding on
> March 12, 2009 at 10:00 a.m.:
>
> Judge Chin stated that there are two issues that the Court will
> consider at the hearing: (1) whether to accept a guilty plea from the
> defendant to the eleven-count Criminal Information filed by the
> Government, which provides for a maximum sentence of 150 years'
> imprisonment; and (2) whether the defendant should be remanded or
> released on conditions of bail, if the Court accepts a guilty plea.
> Judge Chin also stated that, at the hearing on March 12, 2009, he will
> conduct a plea allocution of the defendant and then will announce
> whether the Court intends to accept the plea. At that time, the Court
> will solicit speakers who disagree with the Court's intended ruling.
>
> Assuming the defendant pleads guilty and his plea is accepted by the
> Court, the Court intends to allow the Government and defense counsel
> to speak on the issue of bail. The Court will then announce its
> intended ruling on that issue. The Court will then invite individuals
> who disagree with the proposed ruling on bail to be heard.
>
> The Court noted that there will be opportunity for victims to be
> heard in the future on the subjects of sentencing, forfeiture and
> restitution in advance of any sentencing of the defendant. The Court
> also noted that it is not appropriate for victims who wish to speak
> concerning sentencing issues to be heard at the March 12, 2009
> proceeding.
>
> A link to the a transcript of the March 10, 2009 Court hearing can
> be
> found on the website of the United States Attorney's Office for the
> Southern District of New York:
>
> http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/nys
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 10:56 AM
> To: usanys.madoff@usdoj.gov
> Subject: FW: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
> KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
> Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 12:58 PM
> To: horwitzd@dicksteinshapiro.com; Nardoza, Robert (USANYE);
> USAMA-Media (USAMA); Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
> Cc: oig
> Subject: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and KPMG
> etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
>
> horwitzd@dicksteinshapiro.com
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Sartory, Thomas J." <TSartory@goulstonstorrs.com>
> Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 07:41:20 -0500
> Subject: RE: I did talk the lawyers Golub and Flumenbaum tried to
> discuss Bernie Madoff and KPMG etc before sending these emails
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> I am General Counsel at Goulston & Storrs. Your email below to
> Messers. Rosensweig and Reisch has been forwarded to me for response.
> While it's not clear what type of assistance, if any, you seek from
> Goulston % Storrs, please be advised that we are not in a position to
> help you. Please do not send further communications to any of our
> attorneys. We will not be able to respond, and your communications
> will not be protected by the attorney-client privilege.
>
> We wish you well in the pursuit of your concerns.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Thomas J. Sartory
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:
> Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 8:18 PM
> To: Rosensweig, Richard J.; info@LAtaxlawyers.com; Reisch, Alan M.;
> reed@hbsslaw.com
> Subject: Fwd: I did talk the lawyers Golub and Flumenbaum tried to
> discuss Bernie Madoff and KPMG etc before sending these emails
>
> Perhaps somebody should call me back now. EH? (506 756 8687)
>
No comments:
Post a Comment