Residents
of Saint Andrews are trying to find a way to eliminate the increasing
number of deer in the southern New Brunswick town. (Marc-Antoine Mageau/Radio-Canada)
Oh deer — the town of Saint Andrews has a problem.
A
harsh winter might have taken a toll on the province's deer population,
but the southern New Brunswick town is still trying to tackle a growing
number of deer within its borders.
"The reality is no matter
where you go, you're either seeing a deer or the damage that they've
done," said Brad Henderson, deputy mayor of Saint Andrews.
Deer have been a problem for Saint Andrews residents for more than 10 years, he said.
They destroy
gardens, forcing residents to build fences, which have altered the
streetscape of the town. More residents are also getting into collisions
with deer, which is a rising concern, particularly with the coming
tourist season.
"As a community we have adjusted," he said. "Most people go very slowly around town."
The deer may also carry ticks infected with Borrelia bacteria, which cause Lyme disease.
Henderson
said there are 13 deer per square kilometre in Saint Andrews, four
times the normal amount for a town of its size. The town is about 8.5
square kilometres.
It's a very safe area with a food source for them.- Brad Henderson, deputy mayor of Saint Andrews
"To
put that into perspective, a normal community of our size and location
would have about three to five per square kilometre," he said.
During
the fall of 2017, Henderson said, the town partnered with the
University of New Brunswick's department of forestry and environmental
management on a project where students counted deer in different areas
of the town.
UNB also provided recommendations to eliminate the deer problem, including a cull followed by an annual nuisance hunt.
For
the cull, deer would be lured to a specific spot in town, where
a marksman would be ready to kill the animals. The nuisance hunt would
be an in-town bow hunt by recreational hunters.
Finding a solution
According
to the province, about 20 per cent of New Brunswick's deer herd died
over the winter.
That's about six per cent more than average.
In a door-to-door survey, students found residents weren't opposed to a cull and nuisance hunt.
"We have come to the conclusion that doing nothing is not happening," Henderson said.
Eighty-four per cent of residents surveyed found the deer population out of control.
Sixty-four per cent said they were concerned about their health and safety.
Why so many deer?
Henderson said the town is working alongside the province to determine whether a cull and hunt can help solve the problem.
Other
possible solutions include birth control, sterilizing male deer and
relocation, which is controversial because of the stress it puts on the
animals.
While some have argued clearcutting is causing more deer
to move into town, others say the construction of the Route 1 gateway
highway near Saint Andrews in 2010 might also have something to do with
it.
"You've got to wonder if 15 kilometres over a few years, if
the deer didn't actually migrate [in] the other direction toward the
town of Saint Andrews, which is a peninsula that has no predators,"
Henderson said. "There's no hunting per say, and of course no coyotes.
"It's a very safe area with a food source for them."
Mack Leigh Here
is an idea... Stop all of the massive clear cutting and
deforestation... Stop spraying glyphosate and other poisons.. Stop
destroying the deer yards..And...Start protecting our wildlife, clean
air, clean water and biodiversity.... This issue stems from one source
and one source only....Humans.... Leave it to selfish, self-serving
humans whose main concern is the almighty dollar bill and soon we will
have no wildlife left to worry about..
Rosco Holt
Reply to @Mack Leigh:
It would be nice if government protected the environment for wildlife, but everyone knows the greed trumps all.
Alexander
Forbes
Reply to @Mack Leigh:
Sadly most of the people who profess to "care" about the deer have
selfish interests in mind (i.e. to hunt them).
David Amos
Reply to @Mack Leigh:
I agree but methinks for the benefit of the Irving Clan common sense
and empathy are not permitted in New Brunswick N'esy Pas?
David Amos
Reply to @Rosco holt: Oh So True
Alexander
Forbes Let me guess...The solution will result in more deer deaths...
Mack Leigh
Reply to @Alexander
Forbes: Continuing on that path and leaving the decisions up to
politicians and bureaucrats soon we will have no deer or moose left...
Alexander
Forbes
Reply to @Mack Leigh: I am more concerned about short-sighted "solutions" like canned hunting, culls, etc.
David Amos
Reply to @Mack Leigh: YUP
Murray Brown Hunt them... Problem solved.
David Amos
Reply to @Murray Brown: Nope
Shawn McShane Reply to @Murray Brown: To extinction? They are only there due to the clear cut of their habitats.
Paul Bourgoin Winter
Habitat loss will push deer out of established wintering areas in order
to survive looking elsewhere for food. There must be large clear-cuts,
the use of herbicides reducing winter and spring deer food availability.
The DNRE’s lack of manpower and productive management generates deer
migrations into new feeding grounds. The deer should not be culled but
should be managed to sustain our disappearing deer populations on the
verge of non-existing in New Brunswick while our government looks the
way!
David Amos
Reply to @Paul Bourgoin: YUP
Amy Whitmore
Reply to @Paul Bourgoin: also Kingsbrae Gardens being built on the edge of town in what used to be woods
Paul Bourgoin Government
could advertise that town Saint Andrews is now recognized as the New
Brunswick’s Deer capital but the bad standpoint is no one can HUNT in
Urban areas! (Culling Deer is excluded as solutions.)
David Amos
Reply to @Paul Bourgoin: Methinks thats confusing the issue N'esy Pas?
Johanna Pontin
Poor babies, all they want is to eat, to survive... just like we do...
David Amos
Reply to @Johanna Pontin: YUP
Michael G.
L. Geraldson
My dog does a pretty good job of keeping them off my property, and he's too small to be a serious threat to them.
David Amos
Reply to @Michael G.
L. Geraldson: Two weeks ago when I was in town for the EUB hearing I
almost hit a herd of five all at once right downtown They all looked
very healthy to me and afraid of anything.
Harold Benson
Reply to @Michael G. L. Geraldson: Yes, dogs. Well that is another kettle.
Shawn McShane
Reply to @Michael G. L. Geraldson: Why do you think the deer are on your property in the first place?
Michael G. L. Geraldson
Reply to @Shawn McShane:
Eating my plants, apples, peaches and anything else they fancy that day.
They actually jump the fence, then the dog chases away, and they jump
the fence again.
Paul Bourgoin
Reply to @Shawn
McShane: Protected areas such as deer wintering areas, buffer zones
along streams and rivers are open to harvesting when requested by
logging companies. The decisions are most likely politically taken on
unfounded facts but are to please the logging companies who harvest
them, and herbicides these once protected areas such as Deer Wintering
Areas and buffer zones!
---------- Original message ----------
From: Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca
Date:
Sun, 9 Jun 2019 19:40:33 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : Methinks David
Coon Mark Darcy and
their spouses must have discussed my emails to them
earlier when we
crossed paths last night N'esy Pas?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
?
-English
Follows-
Bonjour,
Nous vous remercions d'avoir contacté le bureau
de l'honorable Mélanie
Joly. Par le présent courriel, nous confirmons la
bonne réception de
votre correspondance. ?Votre demande sera traitée dans les
meilleurs
délais.
Veuillez prendre note que si votre demande est destinée
à l'honorable
Mélanie Joly dans ses fonctions de ministre fédérale du
Tourisme, des
langues officielles et de la Francophonie, nous vous demandons
de bien
vouloir écrire à l'adresse suivante: hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca<
Je
vous prie d'agréer, l'expression de mes sentiments les meilleurs.
Bureau
de l'honorable Mélanie Joly,
Députée d'Ahuntsic-Cartierville
Thank
you for contacting the office of Honourable Mélanie Joly, Member
of
Parliament for Ahuntsic-Cartierville. This e-mail acknowledges
receipt of
your correspondence, which will be processed as soon as
possible.
Please
note, if your request is intended for the Honourable Mélanie
Joly in her
capacity as Minister of Tourism, Official languages and La
Francophonie,
kindly forward your e-mail to the following address: hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca<mailto:hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca>
I
trust that this information will be of assistance to you.
The Honourable
Mélanie Joly
Member of Parliament for
Ahuntsic-Cartierville
---------- Original message ----------
From:
David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date:
Sun, 9 Jun 2019 15:40:25 -0400
Subject: Methinks David Coon Mark Darcy and
their spouses must have discussed
David Raymond Amos@DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos@alllibertynews and 49 others
Methinks David Coon Mark Darcy and their spouses must have discussed my
emails to them earlier when we crossed paths going to the movies in Fat
Fred City last night Trust that I did so with my friends N'esy Pas?
Province announces reduction of herbicide spraying in New Brunswick
26 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
David Amos Surprise Surprise Surprise
Methinks it like half closing the barn door after the horse ran off just
in case he didn't die and may come back for another dose of glyphosate
N'esy Pas?
Buddy Best "Glyphosate
is considered "absolutely necessary" by NB Power as they use it to kill
plants underneath transmission lines throughout the province. (Shane
Fowler/CBC)"
Multi B$ law suits won against Bayer/Monsanto for cancer causing agent
Glyphosate. I can hardly wait until it hits Irving, NB Power and the
province. As they kill plants they also kill every living thing around
them over time. This is not a speeding bullet but a low moving train on
the down hill. But as long as it helps profits who are we to care.
David Amos Content disabled
Reply to @Buddy Best: "Multi B$ law suits won against Bayer/Monsanto for cancer causing agent Glyphosate"
Methinks a lot of people know about Bayer and I anyone cane checkout
page 26 of this old file. Truat that NB Poer and Mr Prime Minister
Trudeau The Younger and his Justice Dept knows that it has been in the
docket of Federal Court in Fredericton for years N'esy Pas?
Shawn McShane So
is Irving going to reduce spraying? Are they going to make the flood
victims whole? Is HIggs even bothered? How about the Liberals? Where
is the People Alliance?
Harold Benson
Reply to @Shawn McShane: Better yet, where are the greens.
David Amos
Reply to @Harold Benson: Methinks they are lost in the ozone now that they have 3 seats they don't want to lose N'esy Pas?
Harold Benson it's time for a class action lawsuit against the spraying of that carcinogen, this one against the NB gov't.
David Amos
Reply to @Harold
Benson: Methinks Sam would agree that its better to sue one by one That
way we all can't lose with one stroke of the pen N'esy Pas?
Paul
Bourgoin “Silence
Spreads In New Brunswick Forests” A story in the Globe and Mail, June
13, 1992, warns of Thousands of songbirds killed every year by Forestry
spraying in New Brunswick”. As many as 175,000 birds die annually to
avoid potential outbreaks of spruce budworm epidemic and also hard wood
suppression. Today we know that pesticides also impacts on humans lives
yet government tolerates as NB residents are exposed to herbicides and
pesticides sprayed from the air for the last 30 years plus. The
impact on Humans, the consequences versus forestry profits and habitat
destruction, Human Lives should be the primary priority for New
Brunswick Residents not Forestry profits. Where is the Political
Conscience towards Human Life?
David Amos
Reply to @Paul
Bourgoin: “Silence Spreads In New Brunswick Forests” A story in the
Globe and Mail, June 13, 1992, warns of Thousands of songbirds killed
every year by Forestry spraying in New Brunswick”.
Methinks we can trust that the dudes working in the Globe and Mail don't
care about what Mr Higgs and his cohorts are up to New Brunswick when
they have the likes of Doug Ford and Justin Trudeau to deal with N'esy
Pas?
---------- Original message
---------- From: "Carr, Jeff Hon. (ELG/EGL)" <Jeff.Carr@gnb.ca> Date:
Sat, 8 Jun 2019 15:28:20 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Mikey Holland the
file I mentioned within the latest article about you and NB Power is on file
in the EUB records at least twice thus far To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank
you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully
read, reviewed and taken into consideration. There may be occasions
when, given the issues you have raised and the need to address
them effectively, we will forward a copy of your correspondence to
the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a response may
take several business days. If your issue is Constituency related,
please contact Roseann at my Constituency office in Fredericton Junction
at roseann.smith@gnb.ca
or 368-2938. Thanks again for your email. ______ Merci pour votre courriel.
Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de nous avoir fait part de vos idées,
commentaires et observations. Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons
attentivement et prenons en considération tous les courriels et lettres que
nous recevons. Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au
ministère responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées
de la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs
jours ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous
répondre. Si votre courriel est lié à une issue de circonscription,
veuillez contacter Roseann à mon bureau de circonscription à
Fredericton Junction à roseann.smith@gnb.ca
ou 368-2938. Merci encore pour votre courriel.
Study
reveals Monsanto manipulated glyphosate approval process Written by Dallas
McQuarrie on August 13, 2018
in Environment, Health, New Brunswick, Rural
- No comments
David Coon, MLA for Fredericton South and New Brunswick
Green Party Leader, accepting another batch of petitions against spraying
the forest in 2016. Photo by Nick Hawkins.
A new study details how
Monsanto, a company that manufactures glyphosate-based products, used deceit
and manipulation to have the chemical herbicide declared safe.
The
scientific article, published in the August 2018 edition of the Journal of
Public Health Policy, documents how Monsanto attempted to manipulate
scientific evidence for its own business interests.
The study, by Dr.
Sheldon Krimsky and Carey Gilliam, uses documents from 3,500 lawsuits against
Monsanto and information obtained through the American Freedom of Information
Act. Krimsky and Gilliam show that Monsanto engaged in the “ghost writing” of
scientific articles, interfered in the reporting of test data by a scientific
journal, prepared presentations for supposedly “independent” scientists,
and exercised “undue influence on [the American] regulatory agency”
that approved the use of glyphosate.
New Brunswick government and
forest industry spokespersons, despite compelling evidence to the contrary,
continue to say that glyphosate is no threat to public health.
The
best-known glyphosate product is the herbicide, Roundup, which is used in
agriculture. VisionMax, Forza and Weedmaster are glyphosate-based products
used in forestry.
Roundup is also the central issue in the 3,500 lawsuits
against Monsanto. Krimsky and Gilliam note that, in every case,
the individuals suing Monsanto say that “she or he, or their loved
ones, developed non-Hodgkin lymphoma due to Roundup exposure. Moreover,
the plaintiffs allege that Monsanto had long covered up the risks of
the glyphosate-based herbicide.”
The glyphosate scandal erupted in
March 2015 when the World Health Organization’s International Agency for
Research on Cancer (IARC) determined that glyphosate was a probable cause of
cancer and reported “strong” evidence that glyphosate caused DNA and
chromosomal damage in human cells.
The glyphosate-cancer link was
brought to the attention of the New Brunswick Legislative Assembly by Green
Party leader David Coon. Coon’s opposition to dangerous herbicides and
defoliants dates back to the mid-1980s when he was opposing the provincial
government’s use of the cancer-causing Agent Orange.
Monsanto feared
the IARC would link glyphosate to cancer, even before the IARC report was
published. Krimsky and Gilliam note a February 2015 internal email by
Monsanto scientist William Heydens that “discussed with colleagues various
papers the company wanted to see published to counter what the company
expected the IARC to find.”
The fact that Monsanto was clearly convinced
well ahead of time that the IARC would find glyphosate to be a cause of
cancer raises questions about what internal data Monsanto had, and whether it
knew that the chemical caused cancer.
In his e-mail, Monsanto’s
Heydens suggests that they “ghostwrite” sections of a scientific paper that
was being prepared by other researchers, and adds, “we would be keeping the
cost down by us doing the writing and they would just edit and sign their
names.” That deception worked, and Krimsky and Gilliam note that
this Monsanto-ghostwritten paper “has been cited hundreds of times” and
was “referenced by the [American] Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
in its finding… that glyphosate was ‘not likely’ carcinogenic.”
As
well, in an internal memo by Monsanto scientist David Saltmiras, he admits
that he “ghost wrote cancer review paper Greim et al. (2015),” a document
also cited by the EPA in its 2016 decision that glyphosate was safe for human
use.
In 2016, Monsanto hired the firm Intertek Scientific &
Regulatory Consultancy to write articles discrediting the World
Health Organization’s research linking glyphosate to cancer.
Intertek initially denied contact by Monsanto, but court documents cited
by Krimsky and Gilliam show those denials were lies. In fact, as
Krimsky and Gilliam note, “the documents demonstrate Monsanto was engaged
in organizing, reviewing, and editing the drafts, even arguing with one of
the authors and overruling him about language in the manuscript.”
The
Krimsky-Gilliam article cites “internal Monsanto documents [that] show that
Monsanto officials directed and organized a campaign to pressure” another
journal into withdrawing a peer-reviewed paper showing harmful effects to
animals exposed to Roundup.
Monsanto also gave Wallace Hayes, the
editor-in-chief 0f scientific journal Food and Chemical Toxicology, a secret
$400 an hour consulting contract. Hayes never declared the conflict of
interest.
The Krimsky-Gilliam article details how “Monsanto officials
developed presentations for academic scientists to deliver at seminars and
other public forums,” despite the fact that “scientists who present
their findings at scientific meetings are generally expected to disclose
any conflicts of interest, as well as any collaborators.” Monsanto
did this “in multiple instances involving multiple professors.”
Not
content with using tame scientists, Monsanto also worked closely with at
least three EPA officials in the United States “to derail a review of
glyphosate by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR)
that was underway in 2015.” Monsanto’s fear was that ATSDR review “would find
carcinogenecity concerns with glyphosate just as IARC had.”
“Coon has
been fighting glyphosate spraying for many years”: Glyphosate
opponent
Cocagne resident and long-time anti-glyphosate activist
Serge Robichaud, said Coon “was the only party leader seriously opposed
to it during the last provincial election in 2014, and he has shown
his commitment to banning glyphosate during his time in office.”
In
December 2016, Coon proposed legislation to amend the Crown Lands and Forests
Act. Coon proposed to replace clear-cutting and glyphosate spraying with
ecological sustainability, fairness for private woodlot owners and
independent sawmill operators, and acknowledgment of Aboriginal rights. The
Liberals and Conservatives did not support the bill.
Robichaud notes
that “Coon has been fighting glyphosate spraying for many years,” and adds he
doesn’t trust the other parties to support a glyphosate ban. He said, “What
is needed now to stop the use of glyphosate is a class action lawsuit against
the federal government based on the very flawed Canadian approval
process.”
Rod Cumberland is a wildlife biologist concerned about the
presence of glyphosate in food. He is not satisfied with the
provincial government’s approach to the potential dangers of a chemical the
World Health Organization says probably causes cancer.
“The people of
New Brunswick … should care enough about their health and welfare that they
demand the New Brunswick government–specifically the Office of Chief Medical
Officer of Health–begin to test for glyphosate residues in our foods, as well
as test for its presence in the wildlife we consume and the farm products and
meats sold to [New Brunswickers] as healthy products, rather than” allowing
them “to take a ‘wait and see’ approach,” Cumberland said.
“The health
and safety of New Brunswick residents should be important enough that we are
offered a proactive, rather than a reactive, approach by our elected
officials,” Cumberland added. Dallas McQuarrie covers the environment
from Mi’kmaq territory in Kent County.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Harrison, Wanda"
<WHarrison@nbpower.com>
Date:
Sat, 8 Jun 2019 15:28:19 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: EXT - Yo Mikey
Holland the file I mentioned
within the latest article about you and NB Power
is on file in the EUB
records at least twice thus far
To: David Amos
<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I
will be out of the office until Monday, June 10. I will be
periodically
checking emails.
Please contact Joanne Regan at jregan@nbpower.com or
458-3711 for any issues.
Thank
you
________________________________
This e-mail
communication (including any or all attachments) is
intended only for the use
of the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material. If
you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, any use, review,
retransmission, distribution, dissemination,
copying, printing, or
other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon
this e-mail, is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in
error, please
contact the sender and delete the original and any copy of this
e-mail
and any printout thereof, immediately. Your co-operation
is
appreciated.
Le pr?sent courriel (y compris toute pi?ce jointe)
s'adresse
uniquement ? son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou
un
organisme, et pourrait comporter des renseignements privil?gi?s
ou
confidentiels. Si vous n'?tes pas le destinataire du courriel, il
est
interdit d'utiliser, de revoir, de retransmettre, de distribuer,
de
diss?miner, de copier ou d'imprimer ce courriel, d'agir en vous y
fiant
ou de vous en servir de toute autre fa?on. Si vous avez re?u le
pr?sent
courriel par erreur, pri?re de communiquer avec l'exp?diteur
et d'?liminer
l'original du courriel, ainsi que toute copie
?lectronique ou imprim?e de
celui-ci, imm?diatement. Nous sommes
reconnaissants de votre
collaboration.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca
Date:
Sat, 8 Jun 2019 15:28:17 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : Yo Mikey
Holland the file I mentioned
within the latest article about you and NB Power
is on file in the EUB
records at least twice thus far
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
?
-English
Follows-
Bonjour,
Nous vous remercions d'avoir contacté le bureau
de l'honorable Mélanie
Joly. Par le présent courriel, nous confirmons la
bonne réception de
votre correspondance. ?Votre demande sera traitée dans les
meilleurs
délais.
Veuillez prendre note que si votre demande est destinée
à l'honorable
Mélanie Joly dans ses fonctions de ministre fédérale du
Tourisme, des
langues officielles et de la Francophonie, nous vous demandons
de bien
vouloir écrire à l'adresse suivante: hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca<mailto:hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca>
Je
vous prie d'agréer, l'expression de mes sentiments les meilleurs.
Bureau
de l'honorable Mélanie Joly,
Députée d'Ahuntsic-Cartierville
Thank
you for contacting the office of Honourable Mélanie Joly, Member
of
Parliament for Ahuntsic-Cartierville. This e-mail acknowledges
receipt of
your correspondence, which will be processed as soon as
possible.
Please
note, if your request is intended for the Honourable Mélanie
Joly in her
capacity as Minister of Tourism, Official languages and La
Francophonie,
kindly forward your e-mail to the following address: hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca<mailto:hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca>
I
trust that this information will be of assistance to you.
The Honourable
Mélanie Joly
Member of Parliament for
Ahuntsic-Cartierville
---------- Original message ----------
From:
Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date:
Sat, 8 Jun 2019 15:40:02 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Mikey Holland the
file I mentioned within
the latest article about you and NB Power is on file
in the EUB
records at least twice thus far
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank
you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully
read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions
when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them
effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate
government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business
days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre
courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos
idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous
lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et
lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre
message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent
être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence,
plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous
répondre.
Province announces reduction of herbicide spraying in New Brunswick
A reduction of 30 per cent along NB Power transmission lines and a promise of future regulations Shane Fowler · CBC News · Posted: Jun 07, 2019 6:18 PM AT
22 Comments
Paul Bourgoin “Silence Spreads In New Brunswick Forests” A story in the Globe and Mail, June 13, 1992, warns of Thousands of songbirds killed every year by Forestry spraying in New Brunswick”. As many as 175,000 birds die annually to avoid potential outbreaks of spruce budworm epidemic and also hard wood suppression. Today we know that pesticides also impacts on humans lives yet government tolerates as NB residents are exposed to herbicides and pesticides sprayed from the air for the last 30 years plus. The impact on Humans, the consequences versus forestry profits and habitat destruction, Human Lives should be the primary priority for New Brunswick Residents not Forestry profits. Where is the Political Conscience towards Human Life?
David Amos Reply to @Paul Bourgoin: “Silence Spreads In New Brunswick Forests” A story in the Globe and Mail, June 13, 1992, warns of Thousands of songbirds killed every year by Forestry spraying in New Brunswick”.
Methinks we can trust that the dudes working in the Globe and Mail don't care about what Mr Higgs and his cohorts are up to New Brunswick when they have the likes of Doug Ford and Justin Trudeau to deal with N'esy Pas?
David Amos Surprise Surprise Surprise Methinks it like half closing the barn door after the horse ran off just in case he didn't die and may come back for another dose of glyphosate N'esy Pas?
Buddy Best "Glyphosate is considered "absolutely necessary" by NB Power as they use it to kill plants underneath transmission lines throughout the province. (Shane Fowler/CBC)" Multi B$ law suits won against Bayer/Monsanto for cancer causing agent Glyphosate. I can hardly wait until it hits Irving, NB Power and the province. As they kill plants they also kill every living thing around them over time. This is not a speeding bullet but a low moving train on the down hill. But as long as it helps profits who are we to care
David Amos Content disabled Reply to @Buddy Best: "Multi B$ law suits won against Bayer/Monsanto for cancer causing agent Glyphosate"
Methinks a lot of people know about Bayer and I anyone cane checkout page 26 of this old file. Truat that NB Poer and Mr Prime Minister Trudeau The Younger and his Justice Dept knows that it has been in the docket of Federal Court in Fredericton for years N'esy Pas?
J.D. Irving Ltd. uses glyphosate-based herbicides extensively in New Brunswick. (CBC)
The province announced Friday it will be reducing the use of herbicidal spray this year.
Two
government departments announced the controversial spraying of
glyphosate would be reduced in their respective areas. Critics are
saying it's a step in the right direction, but they are still calling
for an outright ban on spraying.
Licences to spray glyphosate are
approved by the provincial government each year for widespread use by
the forestry industry as well as NB Power to stem plant growth or
encourage selective growth for certain tree species.
"We
are announcing a reduction of 30 per cent in the spraying of NB Power's
power lines this year," said Mike Holland, the minister of energy and
resource development, during question period in the provincial
legislature.
Environment
Minister Jeff Carr says the province will be reducing its reliance on
glyphosate in protected wetland and watershed areas, with a promise of
more regulations in the future. (CBC)
Jeff Carr,
the minister of environment and local government, also announced the
reduction of the herbicide elsewhere, but he did not state by how much.
"Through
consultation with my honourable member here and with industry and by
talking with NB Power and with woodlot owners, we are also going to
reduce spraying in protected watershed areas on Crown lands this year,"
said Carr.
"We will start to create more regulations for a future time."
Energy
Minister Mike Holland says the decision to reduce glyphosate use came
from a combination of environmental concerns and a reduced need for the
herbicide this year. (CBC)
When
asked if the decision was in response to environmental concerns or if
there was just less need for the herbicide, Holland said, "It's both."
"Every year it will be reviewed annually," he said.
Holland said
his interest into the use of the herbicide comes from a love of the
outdoors. He described himself as an avid outdoorsman and hunter.
"My
focus was very much particular on how it affects animals," said
Holland. "When you look at something that is very effective at killing
vegetation, that vegetation is food for the animals that live in the
woods.
"When I review herbicide spraying or herbicide application
of any kind, I'm looking at merging it into a system that allows …
industry to continue at a profitable rate," he continued, "while at the
same time allowing me to put more food back in the fridge for wildlife
by being pretty deliberate about finding areas where we can increase
that naturally regrowing habitat."
A first step
A reduction in spraying may be a step in the right direction for those who oppose it — but only the first step.
"We
asked the minister not to sign the permits so there would be no
spraying of glyphosate," said David Coon, leader of the Green Party. "Of
course, less is better, but what we want to see is no spraying."
"The
minister announced today that they were going to end the spraying,
prohibit spraying, in legally protected drinking water watersheds, like
the Turtle Creek reservoir," Coon continued.
"They never should have been spraying there in the first place."
Caroline
Lubbe-D'Arcy said the announcement is "better than what we were
probably expecting." Lubbe-D'Arcy chairs the Stop Spraying New
Brunswick group that campaigns and protests against the continued use of the herbicide in the province.
"It's
a small step in the direction that we're hoping to go towards," she
said. "We're still of course asking for a ban on the spraying by NB
Power and on public land."
Caroline Lubbe-D'Arcy,
the lead organizer of the group Stop Spraying New Brunswick says
Friday's announcement is a step in the right direction, but it's still
not the outright ban her group has been advocating for. (Shane Fowler/CBC)
Lubbe-D'Arcy said
she and another member of the group had recently met with Holland to
discuss glyphosate use, but she was in the dark about the specifics of
Friday's announcement.
She said in regards to plans for future reductions, as referenced by Carr, she doubts government has a plan.
Glyphosate
is considered "absolutely necessary" by NB Power as they use it to kill
plants underneath transmission lines throughout the province. (Shane Fowler/CBC)
"I don't know if they know yet," said Lubbe-D'Arcy.
She
said the Department of Energy and Resource Development told her group
it was planning to reduce spraying on what she believes is all Crown
land normally sprayed each year from 25 per cent to 20 per cent.
"But
we're not sure if that's good news," said Lubbe-D'Arcy. "Because in
five years that would mean you've still sprayed it. You've just spread
it out over a bunch of years."
Both Lubbe-D'Arcy and Coon referred
to Friday's announcement as prohibiting spraying in protected wetlands
and watersheds, while Carr detailed it as a "reduction."
CBC News
has reached out to the Department of Environment and Local government
for clarification but has not yet received a response.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Fine, Sean" <SFine@globeandmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2019 21:15:58 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Mikey Holland at least your boss Mr
Higgs, your many minions in NB Power and many others cannot deny that
I kept you all duly informed while you all just laughed me N'esy Pas
Chuckky Leblanc?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
?I am in a place far removed from reality, from June 1 to June 8. On
my return, I promise to be kinder.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2019 21:15:56 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : YO Mikey Holland at least your boss Mr
Higgs, your many minions in NB Power and many others cannot deny that
I kept you all duly informed while you all just laughed me N'esy Pas
Chuckky Leblanc?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
?
-English Follows-
Bonjour,
Nous vous remercions d'avoir contacté le bureau de l'honorable Mélanie
Joly. Par le présent courriel, nous confirmons la bonne réception de
votre correspondance. ?Votre demande sera traitée dans les meilleurs
délais.
Veuillez prendre note que si votre demande est destinée à l'honorable
Mélanie Joly dans ses fonctions de ministre fédérale du Tourisme, des
langues officielles et de la Francophonie, nous vous demandons de bien
vouloir écrire à l'adresse suivante: hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca<
Je vous prie d'agréer, l'expression de mes sentiments les meilleurs.
Bureau de l'honorable Mélanie Joly,
Députée d'Ahuntsic-Cartierville
Thank you for contacting the office of Honourable Mélanie Joly, Member
of Parliament for Ahuntsic-Cartierville. This e-mail acknowledges
receipt of your correspondence, which will be processed as soon as
possible.
Please note, if your request is intended for the Honourable Mélanie
Joly in her capacity as Minister of Tourism, Official languages and La
Francophonie, kindly forward your e-mail to the following address: hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca<mailto:hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca>
I trust that this information will be of assistance to you.
The Honourable Mélanie Joly
Member of Parliament for Ahuntsic-Cartierville
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2019 20:47:05 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Matter No. 357 - NB Power 2017 Rate Design /
Instance Nº 357 - Énergie NB - Établissement des tarifs pour 2017
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
[Le français suit.]
On behalf of Premier Blaine Higgs, I would like to acknowledge receipt
of your email.
Please note that your request will be processed as soon as possible.
Thank you for taking the time to write the Premier.
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144
Thank you
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Au nom du premier ministre Blaine Higgs, j’accuse réception de votre courriel.
Veuillez noter que votre demande sera traitée dans les plus brefs délais.
Je vous remercie d’avoir pris le temps d’écrire au premier ministre.
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Merci.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Harrison, Wanda" <WHarrison@nbpower.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2019 15:28:19 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: EXT - Yo Mikey Holland the file I mentioned
within the latest article about you and NB Power is on file in the EUB
records at least twice thus far
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I will be out of the office until Monday, June 10. I will be
periodically checking emails.
Please contact Joanne Regan at jregan@nbpower.com or 458-3711 for any issues.
Thank you
________________________________
This e-mail communication (including any or all attachments) is
intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If
you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any use, review,
retransmission, distribution, dissemination, copying, printing, or
other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this e-mail, is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
contact the sender and delete the original and any copy of this e-mail
and any printout thereof, immediately. Your co-operation is
appreciated.
Le pr?sent courriel (y compris toute pi?ce jointe) s'adresse
uniquement ? son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou un
organisme, et pourrait comporter des renseignements privil?gi?s ou
confidentiels. Si vous n'?tes pas le destinataire du courriel, il est
interdit d'utiliser, de revoir, de retransmettre, de distribuer, de
diss?miner, de copier ou d'imprimer ce courriel, d'agir en vous y
fiant ou de vous en servir de toute autre fa?on. Si vous avez re?u le
pr?sent courriel par erreur, pri?re de communiquer avec l'exp?diteur
et d'?liminer l'original du courriel, ainsi que toute copie
?lectronique ou imprim?e de celui-ci, imm?diatement. Nous sommes
reconnaissants de votre collaboration.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Carr, Jeff Hon. (ELG/EGL)" <Jeff.Carr@gnb.ca>
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2019 20:47:09 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Matter No. 357 - NB Power 2017 Rate Design /
Instance Nº 357 - Énergie NB - Établissement des tarifs pour 2017
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration. There may be occasions when,
given the issues you have raised and the need to address them
effectively, we will forward a copy of your correspondence to the
appropriate government official. Accordingly, a response may take
several business days. If your issue is Constituency related, please
contact Roseann at my Constituency office in Fredericton Junction at roseann.smith@gnb.ca or 368-2938. Thanks again for your email. ______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations. Nous
tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons. Dans
certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Si votre courriel est lié à une issue de circonscription, veuillez
contacter Roseann à mon bureau de circonscription à Fredericton
Junction à roseann.smith@gnb.ca ou 368-2938. Merci encore pour votre
courriel.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Wetmore, Ross Hon. (DAAF/MAAP)" <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2019 20:47:05 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Matter No. 357 - NB Power 2017 Rate Design /
Instance Nº 357 - Énergie NB - Établissement des tarifs pour 2017
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are
greatly valued. You can be assured that all emails and letters are
carefully read, reviewed and taken into consideration. There may be
occasions when; given the issues you have raised and the need to
address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Should your issue be consituency related, please contact Glenna Law at
my constituency office in Gagetown at (506) 488-3577 or rosswetmore@bellaliant.com .
Thanks again for your email!
Ross Wetmore
Minister
MLA, Gagetown-Petitcodiac
....................................................................................................................
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations. Nous
tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons. Dans
certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s'écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Si votre courriel est lié à un enjeu circonscription, veuillez
contacter Glenna Law à mon bureau de circonscription à Gagetown (506)
488-3577 ou rosswetmore@bellaliant.com .
Merci encore pour votre courriel!
Ross Wetmore
Ministre
Deputé, Gagetown-Petitcodiac
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Karen.Ludwig@parl.gc.ca
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2019 20:47:19 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Matter No. 357 - NB Power 2017 Rate Design /
Instance Nº 357 - Énergie NB - Établissement des tarifs pour 2017
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
Thank you for reaching out to the Office of Karen Ludwig, Member of
Parliament for New Brunswick Southwest.
This email is to confirm we have received you correspondence and will
be answering it as soon as possible. Please note that we do receive a
high level of correspondence and in the case of an urgent matter
please call (613)-995-5550 or (506)-466-3928.
In order to prioritize correspondence from constituents please include
your postal code.
Sincerely,
Office of Karen Ludwig, M.P.
New Brunswick Southwest
69 Milltown Boulevard
St. Stephen, New Brunswick E3L 1G5
Toll Free: 1.888.350.4734
Email: karen.ludwig@parl.gc.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jane.Philpott@parl.gc.ca
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2019 20:47:18 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Matter No. 357 - NB Power 2017 Rate Design /
Instance Nº 357 - Énergie NB - Établissement des tarifs pour 2017
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
Hello,
Thank you for your email to the Honourable Jane Philpott, Member of
Parliament for Markham-Stouffville.
This automated message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of
your email. Due to the high volume of correspondence, there may be a
delay in processing your email. Rest assured it will be given every
consideration.
If you have not already done so, please send us your full name,
address and postal code which will enable us to assist you more
quickly.
Thank you,
Office of the Hon. Jane Philpott
Member of Parliament, Markham-Stouffville
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2019 20:47:56 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Matter No. 357 - NB Power 2017 Rate Design /
Instance Nº 357 - Énergie NB - Établissement des tarifs pour 2017
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Murphy, Steve" <Steve.Murphy@bellmedia.ca>
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2019 20:47:05 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: [EXT]Fwd: Matter No. 357 - NB Power 2017
Rate Design / Instance Nº 357 - Énergie NB - Établissement des tarifs
pour 2017
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Steve Murphy is away and will respond to your e-mail on or after June
19, 2019. In the meantime, if you wish to contact CTV News please
e-mail atlanticnews@bellmedia.ca or call (902) 454-3200. Thank you.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2019 20:48:11 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Matter No. 357 - NB Power 2017 Rate Design /
Instance Nº 357 - Énergie NB - Établissement des tarifs pour 2017
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com
Public Health Implications of
exposure to RadioFrequency Radiation
Anthony B Miller, MD.Professor Emeritus, Dalla Lana School of
Public Health, University of Toronto, Canada.
We have to be extremely cautious about
increasing the population’s exposure to radiofrequency radiation (RFR). The
telecom industry ignores the fact that the International Agency for Research on
Cancer of the World Health Organization categorized in 2011 all RFR, including that
emitted by cell phones and wifi from cell towers smart meters and routers as in
some schools and many homes, as a possible (Class 2B) carcinogen, a grouping
that also includes lead and DDT (IARC 2011).Since then new science has emerged, both human and animal, confirming
that RFR causes cancer.
The human evidence comprises three
important sets of case-control (human) studies of mobile phone use and brain
cancer:
•The multi-country Interphone studywhich found a 2-fold increased risk of
glioma after 10+ years of regular use of cell phones, with a dose response relationship (Interphone Study
Group, 2010)
•Several
studies by Hardell and his colleagues in Sweden (one of
the first countries to introduce cell phones) showing
2-5 fold increased risk of glioma after prolonged use, especially when exposure began
early in life (Hardell and Carlberg, 2015)
•A large study in France (Cerenat), which found a 5-fold increased risk of
glioma after 5+ years
use (Coureau et al, 2014)
These studies all
show that the lower the exposure, the less the risk.Although an increased risk of glioma was not
reported from a cohort study in the UK (with some misclassification of
exposure) there was a doubling of risk of acoustic neuroma (vestibular
Schwannoma) with ten or more years of mobile phone use (Benson et al, 2013), as
was also found in a case-control study by Hardell et al, 2013, though not by
Moon et al, 2014 from Korea.However, a
case-control study of brain tumors in
adolescents using operator recordsfor exposure in Nordic countries found more than a doubling of risk after 2.8 years since initial
subscription for mobile phone use (Aydin et al. 2011).
RFR is probably also an avoidable
cause of Breast Cancer, based upon 7
unusual clinical case reports of women who kept cell
phones in their bras, supported by exposure modeling
and toxicology (West
et al, 2013).
The incidence of parotid or salivary gland tumors has tripled in Israel:1
in 5 under age 20 (Czerninski et al, 2011), and a rise in the incidence of glioblastoma in the
temporal and frontal regions of the brain has been reported from the UK
(Philips et al 2018), while the incidence of neuro-epithelial
brain cancers has significantly increased in children, adolescents, and young
adults from birth to 24 years in the United States(Gittleman et al, 2015; Ostrom et al 2016).
Tumor promotion by exposure to
radiofrequency electromagnetic fields below exposure limits for humans in
RF-EMF exposed mice were first reported in 2010.Lerchl et al (2015) replicated this finding
with higher numbers of mice per group. They could fully confirm the previous
results. No clear dose–response relationship was evident. Lerchl et al (2015)
hypothesized that metabolic changes are responsible for the effects observed.
Critical evidence of carcinogenicity of RFR in animals was reported by the National Toxicology Program (US). In male Hsd:Sprague Dawley SD rats, exposed to GSM-modulated cell phone
RFR at 900 MHz there was clear evidence of carcinogenic activity based on
incidence of malignant schwannoma in the heart and some evidence of
carcinogenic activity based on incidence of malignant glioma in the
brain. In male Hsd:Sprague Dawley SD rats, exposed to CDMA-modulated
cell phone RFR at 900 MHz there was clear evidence of carcinogenic
activity based on incidence of malignant schwannoma in the heart and some
evidence of carcinogenic activity based on incidence of malignant glioma in the
brain. Multiple organs
(e.g., brain, heart) also had evidence of DNA damage.These findings were supported by a Life-span
Carcinogenic Study from the Ramazzini Institute, in which 2448 male and female
Sprague-Dawley rats had whole-body exposure for 19 h/day to a 1.8 GHz GSM far
field of 0, 5, 25, 50 V/m from prenatal life until natural death.This reproduced the environmental exposure to
RFR generated by 1.8 GHz GSM antenna of radio base stations of mobile phones.
The findings were a statistically significant increase in the incidence of heart
Schwannomas in treated male rats at 50 V/m, a non-significant increase in the incidence of
heart Schwann cell hyperplasiain treated
male and female rats at 50 V/m and anon-significant increase in the incidence of malignant glial tumors in
treated female rats at 50 V/m.(Falcioni
et al, 2018).
My colleague Paul
Heroux, of McGill University,has
suggested that 5G and the Internet of Things (IoT) is a
Trojan horse, with millions of mini-cell towers soon to be installed every 150
m. in our neighbourhoods which will invade the privacy of every home. Optical
fibre is safer, healthier and faster. With optical fibre, everyone could enjoy
a communication speed ultimately 10,000 times faster than wireless, less
vulnerable to hacking and harmless to the health of humans and other species.
An IARC advisory
committee recently recommended that RFR should be re-reviewed with high priority.An extensive literary search will be
conducted for relevant peer-reviewed publications, members (and chair) of a
Working Group will be selected by the IARC Director and the head of the
Monographs program, and the members of the working group will be given specific tasks, and then
will meet for 8 days in Lyon, to reach a conclusion on the carcinogenicity of RFR.
I and many other scientists now believe
that RFR should be categorized as a Class 1 Human Carcinogen, in the same
category as cigarette smoking, asbestos exposure, and X-Rays. Government standards must be changed to reflect
this. RFR is now ubiquitous, and those who use cell
phones or are otherwise exposed to RFR are increasing the risk of cancer in
their bodies, especially after prolonged exposure or exposure beginning in
childhood.
Even if the risk per individual is low, it is
widely distributed and could become a major public health problem, especially
if the planned introduction of 5G proceeds. If 5G is
rolled out we can expect to see an increase in all of these conditions.A moratorium on the roll-out of 5G is
essential.
References
Aydin, D., et al.
Mobile phone use and brain tumors in children and adolescents: a multicenter
case-control study.J. Natl. Cancer
Inst. 2011; 103: 1264-76.
Benson, V.S., et
al. for the Million Women Study Collaborators. Mobile phone use and risk of
brain neoplasms and other cancers: prospective study.Int. J. Epidemiol 2013; 42:792-802.
Coureau, G., et
al. Mobile phone use and brain tumours in the CERENAT case-control study.Occup. Environ. Med 2014; 71: 514-22.
Czerninski R, Zini A, Sgan-Cohen HD. Risk
of parotid malignant tumors in Israel (1970-2006).Epidemiology
2011: 22:130-1. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181feb9f0.
Falcioni, L., Bua,
L., Tibaldi, E., et al. Report of final results regarding brain and heart
tumors in Sprague-Dawley rats exposed from prenatal life until natural death to
mobile phone radiofrequency field representative of a 1.8 GHz GSM base station
environmental emission. Environmental Research 2018;17(1):50.
Gittleman, H.R., et
al. Trends in central nervous system tumor incidence relative to other common
cancers in adults, adolescents, and children in the United States, 2000 to 2010.Cancer, vol. 121, no. 1, 2015, pp. 102-12.
Hardell, L. and
Carlberg M. Mobile phone and cordless phone use
and the risk for glioma - Analysis of pooled case-control studies in Sweden,
1997-2003 and 2007-2009.Pathophysiology
2015; 22:1-13.
Hardell, L., M.
Carlberg, F. Söderqvist and Kjell H. Mild. Pooled analysis of case-control
studies on acoustic neuroma diagnosed 1997-2003 and 2007-2009 and use of mobile
and cordless phones.Int. J.
Oncol. 2013; 43: 1036-44.
IARC Monographs
on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Non-ionizing radiation, Part
2: Radiofrequency Electromagnetic fields. Lyon: International Agency for
Research on Cancer, vol. 102, 2013.
INTERPHONE Study
Group. Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the
INTERPHONE international case-control study. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2010; 39:
675-94.
Lerchl A, Klose M, Grote K et al. Tumor
promotion by exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields below exposure
limits for humans.Biochem Biophys Res
Commun 2015; 459(4):585-90.
Moon, I.S., et
al. Association between vestibular schwannomas and mobile phone use.Tumor Biol. 2014; 35: 581-7.
National
Toxicology Program (2018a). NTP Technical Report on the Toxicology and
Carcinogenesis Studies in Hsd:Sprague-Dawley SD Rats Exposed to Whole-Body
Radio Frequency Radiation at a Frequency (900 MHz) and Modulations (GSM and
CDMA) Used by Cell Phones. NTP TR 595. https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/about_ntp/trpanel/2018/march/tr595peerdraft.pdf.
National
Toxicology Program (2018b). NTP Technical Report on the Toxicology and
Carcinogenesis Studies in B6C3F1/N Mice Exposed to Whole-Body Radio Frequency
Radiation at a Frequency (1800 MHz) and Modulations (GSM and CDMA) Used by Cell
Phones. NTP TR 596. https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/about_ntp/trpanel/2018/march/tr596peerdraft.pdf.
Philips A, Henshaw DL, Lamburn G,
O’Carroll MJ. Brain Tumours: Rise in Glioblastoma Multiforme Incidence in
England 1995-2015 Suggests an Adverse Environmental or Lifestyle Factor.J Environ Public Health 2018; 7910754. doi:
10.1155/2018/7910754.
Ostrom, Q.T., Gittleman, H., de Blank, P.M.
et al. Adolescent and Young Adult Primary Brain and Central Nervous System
Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2008-2012. Neuro-Oncology 2016;
18, suppl. 1: 1–50.
West, J.G., et
al. Multifocal Breast Cancer in Young Women with Prolonged Contact between
Their Breasts and Their Cellular Phones. Case Rep Med. 2013, no. 354682.
No comments:
Post a Comment