https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies

‏ @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @FloryGoncalves and 49 others

Methinks CBC and their cohorts may enjoy a little Deja Vu

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2017/12/a-little-deja-vu-for-cbc-et-al-to-enjoy.html

Anyone can scroll to the bottom of this blog to read the entire email that I sent to CBC et al today EH Pablo Rodriguez ?

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/10/liberals-take-losses-but-win-enough-in.html

#cdnpoli #nbpoli

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/grenier-2017-elections-1.4450669

--------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 22:40:03 +0000
Subject: RE: Attn Chuck.Thompson remember my call to YOU last week
well before polling day was upon us again? So will finally answer an
email?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.

---------- Original message ---------- From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 22:40:02 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Chuck.Thompson remember my call to YOU
last week well before polling day was upon us again? So will finally
answer an email?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<

mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>

Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com

This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 19:39:56 -0300
Subject: Attn Chuck.Thompson remember my call to YOU last week well
before polling day was upon us again? So will finally answer an email?
To: Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca, terry.seguin@cbc.ca,
daniel.mchardie@cbc.ca, serge.rousselle@gnb.ca,
Serge.Cormier@parl.gc.ca, jeremy.keefe@globalnews.ca,
newsroom@globeandmail.ca, tj@burkelaw.ca, kelly@lamrockslaw.com,
Wayne.Long@parl.gc.ca, Pat.Finnigan@parl.gc.ca,
Rene.Arseneault@parl.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca,
COCMoncton@gmail.com, leader@greenparty.ca, elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca,
Alex.Johnston@cbc.ca, sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca,

darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca, hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca,
Robert.Jones@cbc.ca, Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca, Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>,
news <news@dailygleaner.com, steve.murphy@ctv.ca,
David.Akin@globalnews.ca, martine.turcotte@bell.ca,
pablo.rodriguez@parl.gc.ca
Cc: motomaniac333@gmail.com, Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca,
Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca, jesse@viafoura.com, jesse@jessebrown.ca

Well whether you do or not here is a little Deja Vu for the Powers
that Be in CBC and VIAFOURA and something else to bring you people who
wish to forget who you truly work for up to date as well

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2017/12/a-little-deja-vu-for-cbc-et-al-to-enjoy.html

Friday, 22 December 2017

A little Deja Vu for CBC et al to enjoy at Xmass time while I write an
application to the Supreme Court

While CBC and their evil buddies in Viafoura continue to block the ID
they made me create in 2016 my original ID that they used to block
when I ran for a seat in Parliament still works when their mindless
moderators allow it. Go Figure

"Your account has been banned until 1/3/2018. Reason: Final warning:
Your username is not keeping within our Submission Guidelines, for
more information please visit:
http://www.cbc.ca/aboutcbc/discover/submissions.html. When your
account reactivates in 7 days, please change your username to
something that adheres to our Submission Guidelines."

Well I am still me whether I used my middle name or not and CBC is
still as crooked as the snakes they definitely are. Sometimes less is
more so I am only gonna make one comment and see how long it stands
the test of time because I see no need to waste much more of my
precious time with their malicious nonsense. It is way past High Time
to sue the nasty bastards and the CRTC overseers who have refused to
investigate any of my concerns for many years.

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/12/wow-liebrano-propaganda-machine-said.html

Saturday, 30 December 2017

WOW The LIEbrano Propaganda Machine said something correct for a
change "Candidates matter and the unexpected can happen"

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/grenier-2017-elections-1.4450669

Candidates matter and the unexpected can happen: lessons from 2017's elections
The past year of elections featured some narrow victories, surprising
upsets and a few lessons to be learned
By Éric Grenier, CBC News Posted: Dec 30, 2017 5:00 AM ET

---------- Original message ----------
From: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 11:17:20 -0300
Subject: YO Mr Butts Methinks that Mr Scheer and your many cohorts can
never deny the obvious reasons why I ust sue the Queen again N'esy Pas?
To: pm@pm.gc.ca, Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca,
andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com,

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies

‏ @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @FloryGoncalves and 49 others

Content disabled as per the CBC MO

Methinks it must be rotting Mr Scheer's socks knowing that Mr Butts gets to keep his fancy job helping Justin pick his socks while his leadership job is in jeopardy N'esy Pas?

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/10/liberals-take-losses-but-win-enough-in.html

#cdnpoli #nbpoli

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/federal-election-results-2019-cbc-leaders-1.5329485

Liberals take losses but win enough in Quebec and Ontario to form minority government

Conservatives win popular vote with Alberta and Saskatchewan near sweep, but finish 2nd in seats

Peter Zimonjic · CBC News · Posted: Oct 21, 2019 7:00 PM ET

Content disabled

Methinks it must be rotting Mr Scheer's socks knowing that Mr Butts gets to keep his fancy job helping Justin pick his socks while his leadership job is in jeopardy N'esy Pas?

Jason Tremblay
70% of Canada voted for progressive parties.

CONs lost.

Mo Bennett
Reply to @Jason Tremblay: reformacons are always losers, even when they wynne.

Marguerite Deschamps

Reply to @Rob Grace: The Liberals will have nothing to do with the Bloc as Harper did when he had his minority. It will be a Liberal, NDP and Green coalition with the Bloc and the CONs yapping and yapping.

David Allan
Reply to @Marguerite Deschamps:

"The Liberals will have nothing to do with the Bloc as Harper did when he had his minority. It will be a Liberal, NDP and Green coalition with the Bloc and the CONs yapping and yapping."

Why would anyone form a coalition?
Think about it. The Libs have the PMO with no real threat. There isn't even a real threat of a non-confidence vote.

The Greens were quite clear about not forming one.
Try to keep up.

David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Jason Tremblay: Methinks many political pundits understand why I am very proud of my fellow Canadians today N'esy Pas?

David Raymond Amos
Reply to @mo bennett: YO MO How did you get to be such a wiseguy so early in the morning? more importantly why do the SANB members of peoplekind such as the Deschamps dude follow you around like a puppy?

David Raymond Amos

Reply to @Marguerite Deschamps: Methinks that is what you are doing as well N'esy Pas?

David Raymond Amos

Reply to @David Allan: Methinks your fancy red knickers are in quite a knot today N'esy Pas?

Robin Goodfellow
Dear Conservatives, Face it, you're not going to be forming the next government. I will, however, offer you some free advice: drop Scheer and elect a middle-of-the-road, fiscally conservative but socially liberal leader -- the sorts of leaders you USED to elect. You need to understand that social-conservatism is not the Canadian way; to the contrary, it's antithesis of what this country stands for. Trying to inject American influence into your party's policies (and even having an dual American citizen as party leader) is not going to impress Canadians at large. Do you not wonder why, of the five major federal parties you are the only non-progressives? You need to attract moderate voters because it's the moderate masses who decide elections. The Conservatives have gone from "God Save the Queen" Tories to "God Bless America" quasi-US-Republicans in the span of 40 years. That is a massive disservice to your country. Not cool.

David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Robin Goodfellow: Methinks Mr Scheer and his cohorts are very nervous by the fact that I am overjoyed that Diane Lebouthillier kept her seat N'esy Pas?

Bob Prowse
And the Conservatives are TOAST in Quebec

David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Bob Prowse: Methinks everybody knew that before polling day but you must admit that today the liberals have nothing to crow about west of Ontario N'esy Pas?

Agnes Dorey
Not in the least bit surprised by this result. The conservatives on here were out of their minds.

David Raymond Amos

Reply to @Agnes Dorey: I concur

Bruce McIntosh
The Conservatives will be blaming everything except their lame campaign delivered by a weak leader.

David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Bruce McIntosh: YUP

Bruce McIntosh
But...but...but...what happened to 'Prime Minister Scheer'? Another Conservative promise broken.

David Raymond Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @Bruce McIntosh: Methinks it must be rotting Mr Scheer's socks that Mr Butts gets to keep his fancy job N'esy Pas?

David Raymond Amos

Content disabled

Reply to @David Raymond Amos: Strange that that is the only comment to go "Poof" today

Warren Gildemeister
Dougie Ford... the best campaign manager the liberals could have asked for.

David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Warren Gildemeister: Methinks many a true word is said in jest N'esy Pas?

Stan Vincent
The bottom line is Scheer was just too underhanded and deceptive with Canadians. The Conservatives will probably not learn from this however. It is who they are.

David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Stan Vincent: Methinks the bottom line is that Canada got lucky to get a minority government no matter who won the mandate N'esy Pas?

Hugor Hill
Quebec and Ontario will be the big indicators over the next 30min

David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Hugor Hill: Methinks we all know the score now N'esy Pas?

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/jody-wilson-raybould-vancouver-granville-2019-election-results-1.5329617

Jody Wilson-Raybould going back to Ottawa as Independent MP in minority Parliament

Former Liberal cabinet minister grinds out win in close 3-way race

Chad Pawson · CBC News · Posted: Oct 21, 2019 6:09 PM PT

Wilson-Raybould thanks a supporter after winning the riding of Vancouver Granville. (Maggie MacPherson/CBC)

697 Comments

David M Lee
Ministers are expected to be a voice of reason and disagree with the PM when necessary. That is why they're Ministers and not simply yesmen. Instead, she tried to take down her own party rather than discuss these issues with Trudeau direct.

David Raymond Amos
Reply to @David M Lee: Methinks my fellow Independent needs to review all that transpired between us since Mr Prime Minister Trudeau the Younger appointed her to the position of Attorney General and Minister of Justice four very long years ago N'esy Pas?

Orest Zarowsky
The posts here from the CONs are instructive indeed. Nasty, viscous and with out any substance or helpful contributions. This is why they lost the election. The scary thing is how, with the lesson so very fresh, they refuse to learn anything at all from experience. Unfit to govern anything. And it looks like that won't change anytime soon.

David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Orest Zarowsky: Methinks you should also pay attention to comments from fellow Independents such as Me Myself and I N'esy Pas?

David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Orest Zarowsky: Methinks anyone can Google the lady's name and mine N'esy Pas?

Rex Yuan
She had the opportunity of her life to do something positive for her FN people, her constituents and Canadians as a senior Cabinet Minister. She failed because she is a poor politician in balancing conflicts, then stab her party of choice in the back. She is not qualified to be a MP as she is a dysfunctional politician.

David Raymond Amos

Reply to @Rex Yuan: Methinks only fools would have faith in the ethics of a political lawyer no matter what race or gender they happen to be N'esy Pas?

Henry Murdoch
No one cares and she will be forgotten on the back benches. She barely won... lol

Henry Murdoch
Reply to @Paul Sugar: no one really cares

David Raymond Amos

Reply to @Henry Murdoch: Oh So True

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fredericton-ridng-green-jenica-atwin-1.5329739

Greens celebrate first federal seat in New Brunswick

'I'm just so proud,' Jenica Atwin says after becoming first Green to be elected east of B.C.

Elizabeth Fraser · CBC News · Posted: Oct 22, 2019 12:40 AM

Fredericton voters made history on Monday as Green party candidate Jenica Atwin became first-ever Green MP elected east of British Columbia. 2:44

24 Comments

David Raymond Amos
Methinks the lady must have read my emails by now N'esy Pas?

Jim Cyr
lol.........Greens

David Raymond Amos

Reply to @Jim Cyr: Surely you jest

Lou Bell

Hardest working candidate won ! About time people STOPPED voting for puppets of the Cons and Liberals and actually elected the BEST candidate ! She'll do an excellent job for her riding !!!

David Raymond Amos

Reply to @Lou Bell: So you say

Brad Little

I love how Decourcey called the Green's chances of winning this seat "absurd" in an earlier story....shows just how out of touch he was with his constituents. The guy did nothing but vote for what Trudeau told him to for 4 years.

David Raymond Amos

Reply to @Brad Little: True

McKenzie King

Sorry day for NB. One issue, fringe parties are do more harm than good.

David Raymond Amos

Reply to @McKenzie King: Methinks you were not allowed vote with that name If so I suspect you know why I would like to me the person who vouched for you N'esy Pas?

Marc LeBlanc

Not lost on this victory is the fact that in the 2015 election the Greens only got 2399 votes in the Moncton/Riverview/Dieppe riding
This time they got 9371.A gain of 250%.Nearly all at the expense of the Liberals
Hopefully that opens a few eyes.

David Raymond Amos

Reply to @Marc LeBlanc: Methinks many political pundits will claim that it was just a flash in the pan N'esy Pas?

Marc LeBlanc
Reply to @David Raymond Amos: I think the 19-29 year old's have finally figured out just how much power they actually have and aren't going away any time soon.
Look at the 14-15 year old's that are very environmentally active
They will be voting in the next election.....(if it goes 4 years)

David Raymond Amos

Reply to @Marc LeBlanc: The biggest and by far the most interested crowd I was ever allowed to speak to in 7 election was one week ago at the High School in Quispamsis. I had to call the principal's office and ask why I was not invited in light of the fact that everyone else was. Trust the the young ones knew who i was and made me feel more than welcome. It was a small wonder to me as to why I was excluded from all the rest of the High Schools in Fundy Royal since 2004. The first ones I could have spoken to back then would be in their thirties by now.

Clive Gibbons
Good for her. I voted to keep Dimples out of office, but I'm glad the numbers in that riding made it possible to vote the third (or fourth) option...

David Raymond Amos

Reply to @Clive Gibbons: Methinks everybody knew the Yankee I call Harper 2.0 was gonna lose before polling day N'esy Pas?

Sean Curley
Any list of the most impressive individual campaigns run in this election must include Ms. Atwin at or near the top.

David Raymond Amos

Reply to @Sean Curley: True

Martin Hayes
So the Green have seats from coast to coast! (okay, not quite to the coast)

David Raymond Amos

Reply to @Martin Hayes: So?

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/maxime-bernier-loses-beauce-1.5329969

People's Party of Canada leader Maxime Bernier defeated in Quebec riding of Beauce

A former dairy farmer, Conservative candidate Richard Lehoux, trounces Bernier by more than 6,000 votes

The Canadian Press · Posted: Oct 22, 2019

People's Party of Canada leader Maxime Bernier speaks after learning of his loss in Beauceville, Que., on Oct. 21, 2019. (Mathieu Belanger/Reuters)

169 Comments

Frank Paul
"Au revoir" to a really horrendous gong-show of a fringe party fueled by dumb ideas like climate change denialism. But thank you, Rocky Dong, for providing me no shortage of laughs watching your Youtube campaign in my local riding. You entertained with your unrepentant silliness.

David Raymond Amos

Reply to @Frank Paul: Methinks anyone who attended the debates in Fundy Royal in which I encountered two Mad Max's minions will well understand why I am enjoying the lasat last N'esy Pas?

Eugene Peabody
Another bit of good news tonight !

David Raymond Amos

Reply to @Eugene Peabody: Methinks Mr Scheer and many others know that Richard Lehoux and his people need to recall our conversations and my emails before he makes his oath to the Queen N'esy Pas?

Chris He
I love how quiet this comment section is hahahahaha.

That’s right, stay quiet, your hatred and backwardness has no place in this great nation

David Raymond Amos

Reply to @Chris He: Methinks sometimes less is more N'esy Pas?

Neil Gregory
The resounding defeat of Mad Max and his Mindless Minions is a VERY positive reflection on Canadians an Canadian values.

David Raymond Amos

Reply to @Neil Gregory: Methinks its interesting that you are using some of my expressions It must be Freudian Slip on your part N'esy Pas?

Jennifer Douek
Yeah. Goodbye Maxime Bernier. Your tweet about Greta Thunberg said it all. You are a small man who is easily threatened, you are angry at science, you don’t live in the fact-based community, you are not above misogynist attacks on a teenager. You don’t belong in government.

Al Clark

Reply to @Jennifer Douek: POTUS north!

David Raymond Amos

Reply to @Al Clark: You should know

Steve Dueck
This should be no surprise...Canadian politics is not about racial intolerance...and nobody wants a party or person representing them who holds these kinds of views.

David Raymond Amos

Reply to @Steve Dueck: Methinks everybody knows I am no fan of Mad Max but you are not being fair Harper's former cabinet minister Everybody knows the clever lawyer from Beauce never said or implied such things That was just Fake Left and Conservative spin against him. Hence there is no need to keep on spinning such nonsense after he lost N'esy Pas?

Rod Begin
One good thing is PPC is relegated to the trash heap along with Max.

David Raymond Amos

Reply to @Rod Begin: Methinks many would agree that Mad Max is far from done N'esy Pas?

Ryder Pures
This is not the end of the beginning for the PPC. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end.
(apologies to Winston Churchill).

David Raymond Amos

Reply to @Ryder Pures: Methinks many a true word in said in jest N'esy Pas?

(No apologies to any unethical politician living or dead)

Harvey Bishop
Humble pie is tough to swallow for Maxime Bernier, let alone his supporters. He should resign from politics already. His campaign was based on fear, division and misinformation, which Canadians rejected.

Al Clark

Reply to @Harvey Bishop: As was andy's which won 120seats

David Raymond Amos

Reply to @Al Clark: Methinks the cat must have your tongue today N'esy Pas?

Eigen Dude
Byeeee!!

David Raymond Amos

Reply to @Eigen Dude: Who are you addressing?

Liberals take losses but win enough in Quebec and Ontario to form minority government

Conservatives win popular vote with Alberta and Saskatchewan near sweep, but finish 2nd in seats

Peter Zimonjic · CBC News · Posted: Oct 21, 2019 7:00 PM ET

Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau celebrates with his wife, Sophie Gregoire Trudeau, after winning a minority government at the Liberals' election night headquarters Tuesday in Montreal. (Ryan Remiorz/The Canadian Press)

After a tight campaign that saw the two leading parties struggle to break out of the pack, the Liberals under Justin Trudeau have held on to just enough seats in Atlantic Canada, Quebec and Ontario to secure a minority government.

While final ballots are still being counted in several ridings, the Liberals are expected to win 156 seats, 21 fewer than they started with 40 days ago. The Conservatives moved up from 95 seats to an estimated 122, while the NDP lost 15 seats to end up with 24.

The Liberals managed to win despite preliminary numbers showing the Conservatives won the popular vote, taking 34.5 per cent of the vote to the Liberals' 33 per cent. That result was most pronounced in the Prairies, where Conservative turnout and support was very high.

In Alberta, the Conservatives won almost 70 per cent of the popular vote to the Liberals' almost 14 per cent. In Saskatchewan, the Tories took 65 per cent of the vote to the Liberals' 10 per cent.

Liberal Party supporters react as they watch the live federal election results at the Palais des Congres in Montreal, Quebec. (Stephane Mahe/Reuters)

The Liberals managed to hang on to power by holding their ground in both Quebec and Ontario. At dissolution the Liberals had 76 seats in Ontario; they are now poised to win 77 there. In Quebec, the Liberals went into the election with 40 seats and — despite the surging fortunes of the Bloc Québécois — are set to lose only five of those.

The Liberals took 26 of 32 seats in Atlantic Canada — a region the party swept in 2015.

Results

Federal election 2019 results, maps, key races

Harris, Goodale, Bernier and Raitt headline list of notable election winners and losers

Strategic voting, Doug Ford and why the Conservatives 'couldn't break through' in Ontario

Trudeau thanked his supporters, his campaign team, staff and candidates for their hard work. "You did it, my friends. Congratulations," he said.

"From coast to coast to coast tonight, Canadians rejected division and negativity. They rejected cuts and austerity and they voted in favour of a progressive agenda and strong action on climate change.

"It has been the greatest honour to serve you for these past four years and tonight you're sending us back to work for you. We take this responsibility seriously and we will work hard for you, for your families and for your future."

After failing to win a single seat in Saskatchewan or Alberta, Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau says he has heard those provinces' frustrations. 2:01

In his concession speech, Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer thanked his supporters and volunteers for their hard work during the campaign, telling them that the Conservatives are "on the march."

"The strength of our democracy is measured not only by the ballots we cast but also how we move forward after they're counted," Scheer said.

"While's tonight's result isn't what we wanted, I am also incredibly proud — proud of our team, proud of our campaign and proud of the bigger and stronger Conservative team that we will send to Ottawa."

"Tonight Conservatives have put Justin Trudeau on notice and Mr Trudeau, when your government falls Conservatives will be ready and we will win."

Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer says he's looking forward to heading back to Ottawa with a bigger Conservative team while speaking to reporters in Regina, Sask. 1:29

It was an evening of surprises — among them, Liberal Adam van Koeverden's victory over Conservative Deputy Leader Lisa Raitt in the Ontario riding of Milton, and the election of the first Green Party MP outside of B.C. — Jenica Atwin in Fredericton, N.B. — to bring the Green caucus in the House of Commons up to three.

"I served Miltonians for 11 years. There's a lot of people who never make it into the House of Commons and I've been so privileged to be there," Raitt told CBC News after her loss.

"It's not the win that we wanted to have this evening but I'm among my friends, and I'm among my family and everybody who's been with me for 11 years, so we're going to turn it into a celebration of what we've been able to accomplish."

In her concession speech, Ontario Conservative candidate Lisa Raitt says it has been an honour to serve as the deputy leader of her party. 0:51

Goodale goes down to defeat

Long-time Liberal MP and cabinet minister Ralph Goodale lost his Regina-Wascana to Conservative challenger Michael Kram. During his concession speech, Goodale thanked his volunteers and constituents for mandates in the past.

He also expressed gratitude for the many close personal friendships he's made over his years in politics.

"I will always treasure very, very deeply those personal friendships and the bonds that have tied us together," he said. "Because they have been built out of mutual respect and trust, commitment to principles and ideals ... never sparing an ounce of effort, always being willing, all of us together, to go the extra mile to try very hard to accomplish that little bit more for the people that we had the duty and obligation to represent in this riding."

"I've been a loyal Liberal in Saskatchewan for a very long time, much longer than a lot of people would have predicted," Liberal candidate Ralph Goodale says after losing in the federal election. He spoke with reporters his Regina-Wascana riding. 0:53

The Liberals took losses across the country. In Alberta, the party lost all three of its seats. Kent Hehr, who has served as the minister of Veterans Affairs and the associate minister of National Defence, lost his seat in Calgary-Centre to Conservative Greg McLean.

Hehr faced allegations of sexual harassment and stepped away from his cabinet posts but was allowed to remain a member of the Liberal caucus.

Amarjeet Sohi, the Liberals' former natural resources minister, was defeated in Edmonton Mill Woods by Conservative Tim Uppal.

Live Blog
Federal election 2019, as it happened

After a grim campaign, Trudeau emerges damaged but victorious

Andrew Scheer falls short — but vows Conservatives will be ready next time

The Liberals also lost the Alberta riding of Calgary Skyview — a seat they won in 2015 with Darshan Kang, who subsequently left the party over sexual harassment allegations — and Edmonton Centre.

Former Liberal justice minister and attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould, who left cabinet and then was expelled from the Liberal caucus during the SNC-Lavalin affair, won an an Independent in her B.C. riding of Vancouver Granville.

PPC leader Bernier loses seat

People's Party of Canada Leader Maxime Bernier lost his seat in the riding of Beauce, Quebec to Conservative candidate Richard Lehoux. In his concession speech, Bernier thanked the 315
candidates across the country who made "huge personal sacrifices" to run for his fledgling party.

"They showed extraordinary courage and passion in defending our principles and policies. They did it despite nasty and shameless attacks from our opponents," he said.

Despite the nationwide defeat, Bernier vowed to keep the party alive to fight in the next election.

"There is no other option for our country. We will be stronger the next time. We will continue to fight for freedom, responsibility, fairness and respect. It's only the beginning for the People's Party."

After his party failed to gain a seat, People's Party of Canada Leader Maxime Bernier says the issues his party raised aren't going away. 2:18

Bloc will 'go even further': Blanchet

The Bloc Québécois, which went into the election with only 10 seats, has won 29 seats in Quebec and is currently leading in another three, signaling another dramatic change to the federal political landscape in that province.

"We've come a long way but we will go even further," leader Yves-François Blanchet told his supporters. "You welcomed me with such warmth it went well beyond my expectations."

The NDP, which started the federal election with 14 MPs in Quebec, appears to have lost most of those seats to the Bloc, with Alexandre Boulerice being the exception in Rosemont-La-Petite-Patrie.

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh says his party will fight for their priorities in Ottawa. 1:55

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh said he's proud of his party's focus on proposing solutions to help people who are struggling, and said his elected MPs will have a constructive, positive role in the new Parliament.

"When we get back to Ottawa, every single day that we're in Parliament, New Democrats are going to be working hard to make sure your life is better, that Canadians' life is better, that peoples' lives are better," he said.

Trudeau won his Montreal riding of Papineau. Scheer won in Regina-Qu'Appelle. Green Party Leader Elizabeth May won her riding of Saanich-Gulf Islands and Singh won his seat in the Vancouver riding of Burnaby South.

Yves-François Blanchet heads to Parliament as leader of resurgent Bloc Québécois

Singh fails to capitalize on late-campaign momentum as NDP loses seats

Robocalls tell voters to head to the polls a day late

May told her supporters that despite not doing as well as Green supporters would have liked, she would use her party's three seats to push for climate action in Ottawa. "We can make a really significant contribution in a minority Parliament and we will," she said.

"I think and I know in my heart that all Canadians do care about the future, they do care about the climate crisis," said May."

"We can make a really significant contribution in a minority parliament," Green Party Leader Elizabeth May says to supporters in Victoria, B.C. Greens picked up 3 seats in the 2019 federal election. 1:13

Elections Canada said roughly 27.1 million people were eligible to vote at one of the approximately 20,000 polling places across the country.

There were 55,515 Canadian expats registered to vote, and a final tally shows 31,798 — a record number — have marked ballots.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

Jody Wilson-Raybould going back to Ottawa as Independent MP in minority Parliament

Former Liberal cabinet minister grinds out win in close 3-way race

Chad Pawson · CBC News · Posted: Oct 21, 2019 6:09 PM PT

Jody Wilson-Raybould addresses supporters after winning the riding of Vancouver Granville as an Independent on Oct. 21, 2019. (CBC)

Former Liberal cabinet minister Jody Wilson-Raybould is returning to Ottawa as an Independent MP for Vancouver Granville, saying her victory sends a strong message to Ottawa about doing politics a new way.

"I am so happy to be standing here as the newly elected Independent candidate for Vancouver Granville," Wilson-Raybould announced to a roaring crowd after her win Monday.

The incumbent narrowly defeated her closest challengers, Liberal Taleeb Noormohamed and Conservative Zach Segal, with around 32 per cent of the vote in what was initially a tight three-way race.

Wilson-Raybould will be the only Independent in the House of Commons after she was ousted from the Liberal Party over the SNC-Lavalin scandal. Then attorney general, she said she was bullied by then-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his office to spare the Quebec engineering firm from prosecution.

Jody Wilson-Raybould hugs supporters after being elected as an Independent MP for Vancouver Granville on Oct. 21, 2019. (Maggie MacPherson/CBC)

Her decision to leave cabinet was followed by her colleague Jane Philpott, who failed in her attempt to win as an Independent in the Ontario riding of Markham-Stouffville. The two politicians supported one another at events throughout the campaign.

Trudeau eventually kicked both women out of the Liberal caucus and many of their supporters saw it as vindication when the federal ethics commissioner concluded that Trudeau violated the Conflict of Interest Act by improperly pressuring Wilson-Raybould to stop the prosecution of SNC-Lavalin.

Anita Bathe ✔ @anitabathe

· 12h

Jody Wilson-Raybould has arrived. The crowd runs to her. It's crazy loud in here and the energy level is high!
A big win as an independent. This is rare in Canada.#cdnpoli #elxn43 #CanadaVotes @Puglaas

Anita Bathe ✔ @anitabathe

"Holy moly" she says.
Jody Wilson-Raybould thanks her supporters and everyone cheers.
"An incredibly humbling moment and experience... Tonight is different. Tonight we accomplished showing Ottawa that independent strong voices matter."

1:55 AM - Oct 22, 2019

Wilson-Raybould declined an offer to run for the Green Party, saying she was content to run as an Independent in 2019. Still, after she was expelled from caucus, she continued to vote with the Liberals on many issues.

'Politics differently'

"Tonight we accomplished — together — something extraordinary," she told her supporters on Monday night. "Independent, strong voices matter, and that we can do politics differently.

In her victory speech, Wilson-Raybould said her win as an Independent shows that politics can be done differently in Canada 0:45

UBC political scientist Gerald Baier said a minority government in Ottawa will allow Wilson-Raybould to pick and choose what issues she wants to support, with little consequence.

"She can vote with the government and nobody is going to punish her," he said. "It's the opportunity to be quite entrepreneurial."

Minority equals 'best laws, policies'

In her victory speech, Wilson-Raybould said she wants to inspire other politicians in Ottawa to work across party lines on issues like climate change, electoral reform and reconciliation with Indigenous peoples.

"I do think the best laws and best policies come from a minority government situation and I am going to be proud … and pleased to work with all the members of Parliament," she said.

Jody Wilson-Raybould calls for non-partisan approach to climate change

On Monday, she spent the day making thank you calls while her volunteers knocked on doors for a last minute push to get voters to the polls.

Wilson-Raybould won her seat in Vancouver handily for the Liberals in 2015.

Entering the race this time, she had the advantage of a significantly larger profile than her challengers. But her campaign team was challenged with persuading voters that she would be an effective MP as an Independent without the same privileges in the House of Commons as the member of a major party.

Wilson-Raybould thanks a supporter after winning the riding of Vancouver Granville. (Maggie MacPherson/CBC)

Riding support

Constituents who attended campaign events in Vancouver Granville ahead of election day said they would vote again for Wilson-Raybould, either because they liked her as a person or because they wanted to send a message to the Liberal Party about its handling of the SNC-Lavalin affair.

Jody Wilson-Raybould wants a minority government and is willing 'to work with whomever' is in power

Some expressed doubts about how much Wilson-Raybould would be able to accomplish in Ottawa as an Independent, but she pledged throughout this campaign to do politics differently through a non-partisan approach

"Vancouver Granville has shown that integrity matters and if we have integrity and do the right thing in politics you can succeed, we can succeed," she said.

Wilson-Raybould is the first Independent MP elected in B.C. since Chuck Cadman in 2004.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

Greens celebrate first federal seat in New Brunswick

'I'm just so proud,' Jenica Atwin says after becoming first Green to be elected east of B.C.

Elizabeth Fraser · CBC News · Posted: Oct 22, 2019 12:40 AM AT

Jenica Atwin is the first Green candidate to win a federal seat east of B.C., taking the riding of Fredericton. (Mike Heenan/CBC)

Fredericton voters made history Monday night, electing the province's first ever Green member of Parliament and giving the Greens their first seat east of British Columbia.

"I'm just so proud," Jenica Atwin said after her victory in the previously Liberal riding was declared late in the night.

"Our hard work is paying off."

Hundreds of Green supporters whooped and hollered for Atwin at a small brewery on Fredericton's north side as the results came in.

Green supporters crammed into a small brewery on Fredericton's north side on Monday night. (Mike Heenan/CBC)

"They are going to hear me, they are going to hear us, and we are going to make the world a better place," she told them.

Atwin led much of the night, with about 33 per cent of the vote, but Conservative Andrea Johnson wasn't far behind, with about 30 per cent.

Liberal Matt DeCourcey, who has held the seat for the past four years, was third, with about 27 per cent of the vote, and the NDP trailed with about six per cent.

Fredericton voters made history on Monday as Green party candidate Jenica Atwin became first-ever Green MP elected east of British Columbia. 2:44

Atwin called the results "a historic win as a Green and as a woman," and said she's ready to get started in her new role as MP.

"Canada is looking at Fredericton. They're looking at New Brunswick. So we're just so excited about this result."

During the campaign, a lot of eyes were on the Fredericton riding, which has chosen a Liberal or Conservative in recent elections. Green Party Leader Elizabeth May spent time in the riding in the closing days of the campaign, as did Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau and Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer.

Jacques Poitras @poitrasCBC

· 15h

Replying to @poitrasCBC

We’re going to be here for a while.

Jacques Poitras @poitrasCBC

Reaction to Atwin taking the lead for the Greens.

9:47 PM - Oct 21, 2019

DeCourcey won almost half the vote in 2015, when the Liberal Party swept all 10 ridings in the province. Fredericton went Conservative in the 2008 and 2011 elections, but at the provincial level, voters have been showing increased support for the Greens.

The party had its first breakthrough in the Maritimes in 2014, when the New Brunswick Green Party leader, David Coon, won a seat in the legislature. In last year's provincial election, the Green caucus expanded to three seats.

Jacques Poitras @poitrasCBC

· 15h

Replying to @poitrasCBC

Swing —

It’s absolutely jammed here.
View image on Twitter

9:38 PM - Oct 21, 2019

Atwin attributed her win to door-knocking, successful debates and the support she received from Coon, whose example as an MLA she considered crucial to her success.

"[The voters] really needed to see what a Green could do before they would trust their vote in this way," she said.

Throughout the federal campaign, Atwin, who works in Indigenous education, focused on climate change, mental illness, poverty and a need for reconciliation with First Nations.

She said her team did everything it could to communicate with voters and spread the message.
"It's nice to see that dot of green," she said.

About the Author

Elizabeth Fraser

Reporter/Editor

Elizabeth Fraser is a reporter/editor with CBC New Brunswick based in Fredericton. She's originally from Manitoba. Story tip? elizabeth.fraser@cbc.ca

With files from CBC's Jacques Poitras

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices|

People's Party of Canada leader Maxime Bernier defeated in Quebec riding of Beauce

A former dairy farmer, Conservative candidate Richard Lehoux, trounces Bernier by more than 6,000 votes

The Canadian Press · Posted: Oct 22, 2019

People's Party of Canada leader Maxime Bernier speaks after learning of his loss in Beauceville, Que., on Oct. 21, 2019. (Mathieu Belanger/Reuters)

The leader of the People's Party of Canada, Maxime Bernier, lost his own riding of Beauce Monday night.

With 97 per cent of the votes counted, Bernier trailed Conservative Richard Lehoux by more than 6,000 votes.

Bernier won the riding for the Conservative Party in the 2006, 2008, 2011 and 2015 elections before breaking with the party and launching his own right-wing party in September 2018.

As PPC leader, Bernier campaigned on cutting taxes, ending corporate subsidies, drastically cutting immigration and encouraging provinces to develop their natural resources.

However, he also faced criticism from his rivals for not doing enough to weed out racists from his party and for denying there's a scientific consensus that humans are responsible for climate change.

Despite Bloc's comeback, Quebec helps propel Liberals to minority government

Bernier lost to Andrew Scheer by less than two percentage points in the 2017 race for Conservative leader. He attributed his loss to a concerted campaign by Quebec dairy farmers who were upset that he was proposing to end the supply management system that regulates the price of eggs, dairy and poultry.

Bernier founded his own party soon after, declaring the Conservatives to be "intellectually and morally corrupt'' and lacking in true conservative principles.

The PPC leader campaigned against what he calls "extreme multiculturalism,'' promising to cut immigration levels and ensure new arrivals respond to Canada's economic needs.

The 56-year-old faced criticism during the campaign for tweets describing 16-year-old climate activist Greta Thunberg as mentally unstable, although he later softened his comments.

People's Party of Canada Leader Maxime Bernier lost his seat in the riding of Beauce. He gave a concession speech to supporters in Beauceville, Que. 5:11

Late last week, The Globe and Mail reported that strategist Warren Kinsella and his firm Daisy Group were hired to "seek and destroy'' Bernier's party and portray its supporters as racist.

The Globe has reported the client was the Conservatives, although Scheer has refused to confirm, deny or even acknowledge the report.

Bernier, who filed a complaint with Elections Canada over the affair, suggested that Kinsella's campaign might have had a hand in the satirical Rhinoceros Party's decision to field a candidate also named Maxime Bernier in the Beauce, in the hope of confusing voters. The Rhinos' Bernier won 1,063 votes, or 1.8 per cent of all votes cast in the riding.

While the PPC ran candidates in almost every riding, the party struggled to break through, and it was polling below three per cent in most opinion surveys.

Lehoux, a former dairy farmer, said last week he was running against not just Bernier, but against the PPC leader's father, as well.

Gilles Bernier, who represented Beauce for the Progressive Conservatives from 1984 to 1993 and then as an Independent until 1997, continues to be a presence in the riding, Lehoux said.

Lehoux said voters felt pressure to stay loyal to the family.

"People have a lot of respect for Gilles,'' Lehoux said. "But I tell them, 'I trust you — on voting day it will be just you in the booth. No one else will know.'"

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

--------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 22:40:03 +0000
Subject: RE: Attn Chuck.Thompson remember my call to YOU last week
well before polling day was upon us again? So will finally answer an
email?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.

---------- Original message ---------- From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 22:40:02 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Chuck.Thompson remember my call to YOU
last week well before polling day was upon us again? So will finally
answer an email?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<

mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>

Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com

This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.

Frank.McKenna@td.com, geoff.regan@parl.gc.ca,
Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.gc.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca,
robert.mckee@gnb.ca, brian.gallant@gnb.ca, benoit.bourque@gnb.ca,
Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, barb.whitenect@gnb.ca
Cc: motomaniac333@gmail.com, Gilles.Cote@gnb.ca,
Yves.Cote@elections.ca, andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca,
john.logan@gnb.ca, Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca,
briangallant10@gmail.com,dan.bussieres@gnb.ca,
bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, bruce.fitch@gnb.ca, bruce.northrup@gnb.ca,
carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, blaine.higgs@gnb.ca,kris.austin@gnb.ca

It is very offensive that Dominic Leblanc gets the best of Health Care
for free while I have to pay EH?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 13:48:28 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Richard Lehoux and Michael Kram
must remember my emails and calls At least they must admit that the
not so Honourable lawyers Ralph Goodale, his buddy Maxime Bernie and
YOU know there are more lawsuits coming N'esy Pas Jody.Wi...
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
Please be assured that your email has been received and will be read with care.
However, in light of the federal elections being held on October 21,
there may be a delay in processing your email.

_________________________________________________________________

Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
Justice et procureur général du Canada.
Soyez assuré que votre courriel a bien été reçu et que celui-ci sera
lu avec soin.
Cependant, compte tenu des élections fédérales du 21 octobre prochain,
veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le
traitement de votre courriel.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Elizabeth.May@parl.gc.ca
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 13:47:28 +0000
Subject: Thank you for contacting the Office of Elizabeth May, O.C., M.P
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Thank you for contacting me. This response is to assure you that your
message has been received. I welcome and appreciate receiving comments
and questions from constituents.

I receive a much larger volume of correspondence (postal and email)
than the average MP. All emails are reviewed on a regular basis,
however due to the high volume of emails my office receives, I may not
be able to respond personally to each one.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 13:48:05 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Richard Lehoux and Michael Kram
must remember my emails and calls At least they must admit that the
not so Honourable lawyers Ralph Goodale, his buddy Maxime Bernie and
YOU know there are more lawsuits coming N'esy Pas Jody.Wi...
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>

Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com

This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 13:46:39 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Richard Lehoux and Michael Kram
must remember my emails and calls At least they must admit that the
not so Honourable lawyers Ralph Goodale, his buddy Maxime Bernie and
YOU know there are more lawsuits coming N'esy Pas Jody.Wi...
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.

There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.

Thanks again for your email.
______

Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

Merci encore pour votre courriel.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 10:41:24 -0300
Subject: Methinks Richard Lehoux and Michael Kram must remember my
emails and calls At least they must admit that the not so Honourable
lawyers Ralph Goodale, his buddy Maxime Bernie and YOU know there are
more lawsuits coming N'esy Pas Jody.Wilson-Raybould?
To: beauce@lehoux2019.ca, info@michaelkram.ca,
hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca,
oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com, charles.murray@gnb.ca,
Sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Jennifer.duggan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Jolene.harvey@nrcmp-grc.gc.ca, Barbara.Massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca, martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca,
premier@ontario.ca, scott.moe@gov.sk.ca, scoop88@rogers.com,
info@peoplespartyofcanada.ca, Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca,
jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, akennedy@quispamsis.ca,
wgallant@quispamsis.ca, wayne.gallant@nbpolice.ca, Jack.Keir@gnb.ca,
Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca, Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca,
Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, Bill.Morneau@parl.gc.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca,
athunder@manitobachiefs.com, David.Coon@gnb.ca,
jenica.atwin@greenparty.ca, votejohnw@gmail.com,
robmoorefundy@gmail.com, rbragdon76@yahoo.ca,
Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc.ca

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 13:03:00 -0400
Subject: Attn Richard Lehoux I just called again
To: beauce@lehoux2019.ca, "maxime.bernier"
<maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>, josiane.fortin@mail.mcgill.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

https://www.conservative.ca/team-member/richard-lehoux/

---------- Original message ----------
From: Kevin Leahy <kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 12:38:43 -0400
Subject: Re: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge (857 259
9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

French will follow

Thank you for your email.

For inquiries regarding EMRO’s Office, please address your email to
acting EMRO Sebastien Brillon at sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

For inquiries regarding CO NHQ Office, please address your email to
acting CO Farquharson, David at David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

All PPS related correspondence should be sent to my PPS account at
kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Merci pour votre courriel.

Pour toute question concernant le Bureau de l'EMRO, veuillez adresser
vos courriels à l’Officier responsable des Relations
employeur-employés par intérim Sébastien Brillon à l'adresse suivante
sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Pour toute question concernant le bureau du Commandant de la
Direction générale, veuillez adresser vos courriels au Commandant de
la Direction générale par intérim Farquharson, David à l'adresse
suivante David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Toute correspondance relative au Service De Protection Parlementaire
doit être envoyée à mon compte de PPS à l'adresse suivante
kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca

Kevin Leahy
Chief Superintendent/Surintendant principal
Director, Parliamentary Protective Service
Directeur , Service de protection parlementaire
T 613-996-5048
Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are
confidential and may contain protected information. It is intended
only for the individual or entity named in the message. If you are not
the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver the
message that this email contains to the intended recipient, you should
not disseminate, distribute or copy this email, nor disclose or use in
any manner the information that it contains. Please notify the sender
immediately if you have received this email by mistake and delete it.
AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ: Le présent courriel et tout fichier qui y est
joint sont confidentiels et peuvent contenir des renseignements
protégés. Il est strictement réservé à l’usage du destinataire prévu.
Si vous n’êtes pas le destinataire prévu, ou le mandataire chargé de
lui transmettre le message que ce courriel contient, vous ne devez ni
le diffuser, le distribuer ou le copier, ni divulguer ou utiliser à
quelque fin que ce soit les renseignements qu’il contient. Veuillez
aviser immédiatement l’expéditeur si vous avez reçu ce courriel par
erreur et supprimez-le.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2018 16:03:53 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : Attn Daniel Gosselin why I have not
recieved any response from you or your lawyers to my phone calls and
emails about the questionable fax and emails your people have sent me
recently?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Bonjour,

Veuillez prendre note que le bureau sera fermé jusqu'au janvier 2019.
Nous vous souhaitons de très Joyeuses Fêtes!

The offiice will be closed until January 7th, 2019.
Best wishes for the Holiday Season!

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Drouin, Nathalie (BRQ)" <Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2018 16:03:43 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : Attn Daniel Gosselin why I have not
recieved any response from you or your lawyers to my phone calls and
emails about the questionable fax and emails your people have sent me
recently?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Veuillez noter que je suis absente jusqu'au 7 janvier 2019, sans accès
à mes courriels. Pour toute question qui ne peut attendre mon
retour, je vous invite à communiquer avec mon adjointe Irène Ghobril
au 514-283-5687. Merci.

Please note that I am away until January 7, 2019, with no access to my
e-mails. For assistance, please contact Irène Ghobril at 514-283-5687.
Thank you.

NOTIFICATION ÉLECTRONIQUE: NotificationPGC-AGC.Civil@justice.gc.ca

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 08:25:43 -0300
Subject: Well Michael Kram must admit that Ralph Goodale can't play
dumb before the writ is dropped
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, athunder@manitobachiefs.com
Cc: info@michaelkram.ca, "hon.ralph.goodale"
<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
"Jody.Wilson-Raybould" <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>,
"Jane.Philpott" <Jane.Philpott@parl.gc.ca>, "darrow.macintyre"
<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre
<andre@jafaust.com>, "charles.murray" <charles.murray@gnb.ca>,
Sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Jennifer.duggan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Jolene.harvey@nrcmp-grc.gc.ca, Barbara.Massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
"Roger.Brown" <Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale (PS/SP)" <Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 23:02:08 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Michael Kram I just called and talked
Colleen about about Ralph Goodale et al I also talked to Mario
Milanovski's wife but I will not bother her again
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la
S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile.
En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un
retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre
message sera examin? avec attention.
Merci!
L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle
S?curit? publique Canada
*********

Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of
Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in
processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
carefully reviewed.
Thank you!
Ministerial Correspondence Unit
Public Safety Canada

On 8/21/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:

> https://www.facebook.com/pg/MichaelKramSK/about/?ref=page_internal
>
> Call 306-737-4145
> m.me/MichaelKramSK
> info@michaelkram.ca
> http://www.michaelkram.ca
> @MichaelKramSK
>
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/mario-milanovski-a1123548/?originalSubdomain=ca
>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/maxime-bernier-people-s-party-canada-saskatchewan-1.5231098
>
> PPC Leader Maxime Bernier announces Sask. federal candidates during
> visit to Regina
> Social Sharing
>
>
> 'I like to have people who are new in politics, that’s what we need'
> CBC News · Posted: Jul 30, 2019 7:04 PM CT
>
>
> Maxime Bernier, the leader of the People's Party of Canada, speaks
> with reporters outside the Legislative Building in Regina on Tuesday.
> (Tyler Pidlubny/CBC News)
>
> Immigration, free speech and equalization reform were talking points
> for People's Party of Canada Leader Maxime Bernier and the
> Saskatchewan federal candidates he announced during a visit to Regina
> on Tuesday.
>
> Bernier told reporters at an event outside the Legislative Building he
> was pleased that some of the candidates are new to politics and their
> platforms were varied.
>
> "Because actually they are not traditional politicians and they are
> regular people that want to help their citizens in working for their
> country," said Bernier.
>
> "I like to have people who are new in politics, that's what we need,
> we need more people like that."
> Roster of candidates growing
>
> Nine candidates were announced at the event in Regina, and more will
> be introduced in Saskatoon on Wednesday.
>
> Mark Friesen (Saskatoon-Grasswood).
> Phillip Michael Zajac (Souris-Moose Mountain).
> Mario Milanovski (Regina-Wascana).
> Lee Harding (Cypress Hills-Grasslands).
> Chey Craik (Moose Jaw-Lake Centre-Lanigan).
> Trevor Wowk (Regina-Lewvan).
> Tracey Sparrowhawk (Regina-Qu'Appelle).
> Cody Payant (Carlton Trail-Eagle Creek).
> Kelly Day (Prince Albert).
>
> 'I'm appealing to their intelligence'
>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale (PS/SP)" <Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
>> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 01:16:32 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Carl Urquhart and Blaine Higgs want
>> to litigate N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc, Cheryl Layton and Janice Graham?
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la
>> S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile.
>> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
>> adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un
>> retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre
>> message sera examin? avec attention.
>> Merci!
>> L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle
>> S?curit? publique Canada
>> *********
>>
>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of
>> Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
>> addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in
>> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
>> carefully reviewed.
>> Thank you!
>> Ministerial Correspondence Unit
>> Public Safety Canada
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 01:16:30 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Carl Urquhart and Blaine Higgs want
>> to litigate N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc, Cheryl Layton and Janice Graham?
>> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Please kindly note that I am out of office from August 12th to 18th,
>> inclusively.
>>
>> If you need any assitance, please contact our constituency office
>> Director, Nicole Picher at : david.lametti.c1@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Thank you!
>> _______________________
>>
>> Bonjour,
>>
>> Veuillez noter que je sui absent du bureau du 12 au 18 ao?t,
>> inclusivement.
>>
>> Si vous avez besoin d'assistance, je vous invite ? communiquer avec
>> notre Directrice de bureau de circonscription, Nicole Picher, ? :
>> david.lametti.c1@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Merci!
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Barbara Massey <Barbara.Massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>> Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2019 21:16:36 -0400
>> Subject: Re: Methinks Carl Urquhart and Blaine Higgs want to litigate
>> N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc, Cheryl Layton and Janice Graham? (Out of
>> Office )
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I will be away from the office until August 19, 2019. In my absence,
>> you may contact:
>> August 2 and August 12-16 incl. – Jolene Harvey 613 843 4892;
>> Jolene.harvey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> August 6-9 incl. – Jennifer Duggan 613 825 2981;
>> Jennifer.duggan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> or my Exec. Asst. – Sandra Lofaro 613 843 3540;
>> Sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Je serai absente du bureau jusqu’au 19 août, 2019. Pendant mon
>> absence, vous pouvez communiquer avec :
>> le 2 août et du 12 au 16 août incl. - Jolene Harvey 613 843 4892;
>> Jolene.harvey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> du 6 au 9 août incl. - Jennifer Duggan 613 825 2981;
>> Jennifer.duggan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> ou mon adj. exec. - Sandra Lofaro 613 843 3540;
>> Sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>>
>>>>> David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> 08/11/19 21:16 >>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
>> <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 18:05:38 +0000
>> Subject: RE: Dr. Mohamed LACHEMI I just called
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
>> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
>> comments.
>>
>> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
>> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
>> commentaires.
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/07/latest-sisson-mine-approval-leaves.html
>>
>> Wednesday, 24 July 2019
>>
>> Latest Sisson Mine approval leaves First Nations, conservation groups
>> uneasy
>>
>> https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
>>
>> David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos 5
>> Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
>> Methinks these people must have read their emails by now N'esy Pas?
>>
>> Entire email is at bottom of this blog
>>
>>
>> https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/07/latest-sisson-mine-approval-leaves.html
>>
>>
>> #nbpoli #cdnpoli
>>
>>
>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/afn-aga-opening-ceremony-fredericton-1.5221890
>>
>>
>> Assembly of First Nations opens annual general assembly in Fredericton
>>
>>
>> 3 Comments
>>
>>
>>
>> David Amos
>> Methinks these people must have read their emails by now N'esy Pas?
>>
>> Entire email is at bottom of this blog
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
>> <Premier@ontario.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:44:31 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: The Honourable Carolyn Bennett can never
>> claim that she did not know N'esy Chucky Leblanc>
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
>> valued.
>>
>> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
>> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>>
>> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
>> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
>> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
>> response may take several business days.
>>
>> Thanks again for your email.
>> ______
>>
>> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
>> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>>
>> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
>> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>>
>> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
>> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
>> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
>> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>>
>> Merci encore pour votre courriel
>>
>>
>>
>> --------- Original message ----------
>> From: carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:39:49 +0000
>> Subject: Thank you for contacting our office
>> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>>
>> Thank you very much for contacting our office. Your message has been
>> received and will be reviewed as soon as possible.
>>
>> Please note that, due to the high volume of correspondence that we
>> receive, priority is given to inquiries from constituents of
>> Toronto-St. Paul's. If you have not done so already, please include
>> your full name, address, and postal code in your message.
>>
>> If you are a constituent and this is a time-sensitive matter, please
>> also do not hesitate to contact our constituency office by phone at
>> 416-952-3990. We are more than happy to assist!
>>
>> If your message is regarding Crown-Indigenous Relations, it will be
>> forwarded to the department office. For all future correspondence
>> pertaining to Crown-Indigenous Relations, we request that you please
>> write directly to
>> aadnc.minister.aandc@canada.ca
>> aadnc.minister.aandc@canada.ca
>>>
>> or call 819-997-0002.
>>
>> Thank you once again for taking the time to contact our office. We
>> hope this information has been helpful, and look forward to connecting
>> with you again soon!
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Hon. Carolyn Bennett
>> Member of Parliament for Toronto-St. Paul's
>>
>> --
>>
>> Merci beaucoup d'avoir communiqué avec notre bureau. Votre message a
>> bien été reçu et il sera traité dès que possible.
>>
>> Veuillez noter qu'en raison du volume élevé de correspondance que nous
>> recevons, la priorité est accordée aux demandes provenant d'habitants
>> de Toronto-St. Paul's. Si ce n'est pas encore fait, nous vous prions
>> d'inclure votre nom complet, votre adresse et votre code postal dans
>> votre message.
>>
>> S'il s'agit d'une question urgente et que vous êtes un électeur de la
>> circonscription susmentionnée, n'hésitez pas à communiquer avec notre
>> bureau de circonscription au 416-952-3990. Nous nous ferons un plaisir
>> de vous aider!
>>
>> Si votre message porte sur les relations Couronne-Autochtones, il sera
>> acheminé au bureau du ministère approprié. Pour toute autre question
>> au sujet des relations Couronne-Autochtones, nous vous saurions gré
>> d'écrire directement au ministère à l'adresse
>> aadnc.minister.aandc@canada.caaadnc.minister.aandc@canada.ca>,
>> ou de l'appeler au 819-997-0002.
>>
>> Merci encore une fois d'avoir pris le temps de communiquer avec notre
>> bureau. Nous espérons que ces informations vous sont utiles, et nous
>> nous réjouissons à la perspective d'échanger avec vous de nouveau!
>>
>> Cordialement,
>>
>> L'honorable Carolyn Bennett
>> Députée de Toronto-St. Paul's
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "Media (RCAANC/CIRNAC)" <RCAANC.Media.CIRNAC@canada.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:39:54 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Federal Court File No T-1557-15 I called
>> Office of the Honourable Carolyn Bennett before she gives her big
>> speech in Fat Fred City today
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for your email. You have contacted the Media Centre for
>> Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada.
>>
>> This is an automatic reply to confirm receipt of your e-mail. We will
>> respond as soon as possible.
>>
>> Please note that this inbox and the Media Centre telephone line
>> (819-934-2302) are monitored Monday through Friday, from 9:00AM to
>> 5:00PM EST, with the exception of holidays.
>>
>> Media Enquiries
>> If you have submitted a media enquiry, we will aim to respond as
>> quickly as possible.
>>
>> For media enquiries requiring an urgent response outside of regular
>> work hours, please contact Michelle Perron
>> (michelle.perron@canada.ca).
>>
>> General Public Enquiries
>> Members of the public may direct their questions to our Public
>> Enquiries service:
>>
>> Email: aadnc.infopubs.aandc@canada.caaadnc.infopubs.aandc@canada.ca
>>>
>> Phone: 1-800-567-9604
>> Teletypewriter (TTY): 1-866-553-0554
>> Fax: 1-866-817-3977
>>
>> Mailing address:
>> Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada
>> Public Enquiries Contact Centre
>> 10 rue Wellington
>> Gatineau QC K1A 0H4
>>
>> ***
>>
>> Merci pour votre courriel. Vous avez contact? le Centre des m?dias de
>> Relations Couronne-Autochtones et Affaires du Nord Canada.
>>
>> Ceci est une r?ponse automatique pour confirmer r?ception de votre
>> courriel. Nous vous r?pondrons le plus t?t possible.
>>
>> Veuillez noter que cette bo?te de r?ception et la ligne t?l?phonique
>> du Centre des m?dias (819-934-2302) sont surveill?es du lundi au
>> vendredi, de 9h00 ? 17h00 HNE, sauf les jours f?ri?s.
>>
>> Requ?tes des m?dias
>> Si vous avez soumis une requ?te, nous tenterons d'y r?pondre le plus
>> rapidement possible.
>>
>> Pour des requ?tes urgentes n?cessitant une r?ponse en dehors des
>> heures r?guli?res de travail, veuillez svp contacter Michelle Perron
>> (michelle.perron@canada.ca).
>>
>> Requ?tes g?n?rales du public
>> Les membres du public peuvent adresser leurs questions ? notre service
>> de requ?tes g?n?rales :
>>
>> Courriel : aadnc.infopubs.aandc@canada.caaadnc.infopubs.aandc@canada.ca>
>> T?l?phone : 1-800-567-9604
>> T?l?imprimeur (ATS) : 1-866-553-0554
>> T?l?copieur : 1-866-817-3977
>>
>> Adresse postale :
>> Affaires autochtones et du Nord Canada
>> Centre de contacts de renseignements du public
>> 10, rue Wellington
>> Gatineau QC K1A 0H4
>>
>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:15:59 -0400
>>> Subject: Hey Ralph Goodale perhaps you and the RCMP should call the
>>> Yankees Governor Charlie Baker, his lawyer Bob Ross, Rachael Rollins
>>> and this cop Robert Ridge (857 259 9083) ASAP EH Mr Primme Minister
>>> Trudeau the Younger and Donald Trump Jr?
>>> To: pm@pm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
>>> Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, djtjr@trumporg.com,
>>> Donald.J.Trump@donaldtrump.com, JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca,
>>> Frank.McKenna@td.com, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> Douglas.Johnson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> gov.press@state.ma.us, bob.ross@state.ma.us, jfurey@nbpower.com,
>>> jfetzer@d.umn.edu, Newsroom@globeandmail.com, sfine@globeandmail.com,
>>> .Poitras@cbc.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
>>> Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, news@kingscorecord.com,
>>> news@dailygleaner.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, jbosnitch@gmail.com,
>>> andre@jafaust.com>
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, DJT@trumporg.com
>>> wharrison@nbpower.com, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
>>> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca
>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: "Murray, Charles (Ombud)" <Charles.Murray@gnb.ca>
>>>> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 18:16:15 +0000
>>>> Subject: You wished to speak with me
>>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> I have the advantage, sir, of having read many of your emails over the
>>>> years.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As such, I do not think a phone conversation between us, and
>>>> specifically one which you might mistakenly assume was in response to
>>>> your threat of legal action against me, is likely to prove a
>>>> productive use of either of our time.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If there is some specific matter about which you wish to communicate
>>>> with me, feel free to email me with the full details and it will be
>>>> given due consideration.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Charles Murray
>>>>
>>>> Ombud NB
>>>>
>>>> Acting Integrity Commissioner
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "LSD / DSJ (JUS/JUS)" <BPIB-DGPAA@justice.gc.ca>
>> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 19:25:31 +0000
>> Subject: RE: YO Pierre Poilievre I just called and tried to reason
>> with David Lametti's minions and got nowhere fast Surprise Surprise
>> Surprise N'esy Pas Petev Baby Mackay?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> This confirms receipt of the message that you recently sent to the
>> Legal Systems Division or to the Justipedia Team of the Legal
>> Practices Branch. We will review your message and reply within
>> forty-eight (48) hours. Please do not reply to this email.
>>
>> ***
>>
>> La présente confirme réception du message que vous avez fait parvenir
>> à la Division des systèmes juridiques ou à l’équipe de Justipédia de
>> la Direction générale des pratiques juridiques. Nous réviserons votre
>> message et vous répondrons dans les quarante-huit (48) heures. Prière
>> de ne pas répondre au présent courriel.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 15:25:26 -0400
>> Subject: Fwd: YO Pierre Poilievre I just called and tried to reason
>> with David Lametti's minions and got nowhere fast Surprise Surprise
>> Surprise N'esy Pas Petev Baby Mackay?
>> To: Support@viafoura.com, darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca,
>> carrie@viafoura.com, allison@viafoura.com
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, LPMD-DGPD@justice.gc.ca,
>> Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 15:00:58 -0400
>> Subject: YO Pierre Poilievre I just called and tried to reason with
>> David Lametti's minions and got nowhere fast Surprise Surprise
>> Surprise N'esy Pas Petev Baby Mackay?
>> To: pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca, olad-dlo@justice.gc.ca,
>> David.Lametti.a1@parl.gc.ca, maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca,
>> andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, charlie.angus@parl.gc.ca,
>> PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com, tony.clement.a1@parl.gc.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, scott.bardsley@canada.ca,
>> scott.brison@parl.gc.ca, scott.macrae@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Beverley.Busson@sen.parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Official Languages Directorate
>>
>> Telephone: 613-957-4967
>> Fax: 613-948-6924
>> Email: olad-dlo@justice.gc.ca
>> Address: Official Languages Directorate
>> Department of Justice Canada
>> 350 Albert Street, 3rd floor
>> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H8
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada
>> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
>> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 17:58:23 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: C'yall in Court
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
>> Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
>>
>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
>> addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay in
>> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
>> carefully reviewed.
>>
>> -------------------
>>
>> Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
>> Justice et procureur général du Canada.
>>
>> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
>> adressée à la ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir
>> un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous
>> assurer que votre message sera lu avec soin.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada
>> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 22:18:45 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks David Lametti should go back to law
>> school too N'esy Pas Pierre Poilievre?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
>> Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
>>
>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
>> addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay in
>> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
>> carefully reviewed.
>>
>> -------------------
>>
>> Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
>> Justice et procureur général du Canada.
>>
>> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
>> adressée à la ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir
>> un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous
>> assurer que votre message sera lu avec soin.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 22:18:49 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks David Lametti should go back to law
>> school too N'esy Pas Pierre Poilievre?
>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
>> of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
>>
>> This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
>> may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
>> message will be carefully reviewed.
>>
>> To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
>> the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>> -------------------
>>
>> Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
>> Vancouver Granville.
>>
>> Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
>> courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
>> correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
>> votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
>>
>> Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
>> veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
>> votre adresse et votre code postal.
>>
>>
>>
>> Merci
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: michael.chong@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 22:18:49 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks David Lametti should go back to law
>> school too N'esy Pas Pierre Poilievre?
>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Thanks very much for getting in touch with me!
>>
>> This email is to acknowledge receipt of your message and to let you
>> know that every incoming email is read and reviewed. A member of my
>> Wellington-Halton Hills team will be in touch with you shortly if
>> follow-up is required.
>> Due to the high volume of email correspondence, priority is given to
>> responding to residents of Wellington-Halton Hills and to emails of a
>> non-chain (or "forwards") variety.
>>
>> In your email, if you:
>>
>> * have verified that you are a constituent by including your
>> complete residential postal address and a phone number, a response
>> will be provided in a timely manner.
>> * have not included your residential postal mailing address,
>> please resend your email with your complete residential postal address
>> and phone number, and a response will be forthcoming.
>>
>> If you are not a constituent of Wellington Halton-Hills, please
>> contact your Member of Parliament. If you are unsure who your MP is,
>> you can find them by searching your postal code at
>> http://www.ourcommons.ca/en
>>
>> Any constituents of Wellington-Halton Hills who require urgent
>> attention are encouraged to call the constituency office at
>> 1-866-878-5556 (toll-free in riding). Please rest assured that any
>> voicemails will be returned promptly.
>>
>> Once again, thank you for your email.
>>
>> The Hon. Michael Chong, M.P.
>> Wellington-Halton Hills
>> toll free riding office:1-866-878-5556
>> Ottawa office: 613-992-4179
>> E-mail: michael.chong@parl.gc.ca<mailto:michael.chong@parl.gc.ca>
>> Website : www.michaelchong.ca<http://www.michaelchong.ca>
>>
>> THIS MESSAGE IS ONLY INTENDED FOR THE USE OF THE INTENDED RECIPIENT(S)
>> AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY AND/OR
>> CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
>> notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution,
>> copying, conversion to hard copy or other use of this communication is
>> strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient and have
>> received this message in error, please notify me by return e-mail and
>> delete this message from your system.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 18:18:40 -0400
>> Subject: Methinks David Lametti should go back to law school too N'esy
>> Pas Pierre Poilievre?
>> To: David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca, Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca,
>> pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca,mcu@justice.gc.ca,
>> michael.chong@parl.gc.ca, Michael.Wernick@pco-bcp.gc.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
>> Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca, serge.rousselle@gnb.ca
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 15:44:16 -0400
>> Subject: Jagmeet Singh says that maybe Jay Shin should go back to law
>> school??? Too Too Funny Indeed EH Karen Wang and Laura-Lynn Tyler
>> Thompson?
>> To: info@jayshin.ca, jay@lonsdalelaw.ca, karenwang@liberal.ca,
>> lauralynnlive@gmail.com
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
>> jmaclellan@burnabynow.com, kgawley@burnabynow.com
>>
>> Jagmeet Singh on Tory opponent: 'Maybe he should go back to law school'
>> Conservative candidate Jay Shin said Singh was 'keeping criminals out
>> of jail' during his days as a criminal defence lawyer
>> Kelvin Gawley Burnaby Now January 13, 2019 10:27 AM
>>
>> Julie MacLellan
>> Assistant editor, and newsroom tip line
>> jmaclellan@burnabynow.com
>> Phone: 604 444 3020
>> Kelvin Gawley
>> kgawley@burnabynow.com
>> Phone: 604 444 3024
>>
>> Jay Shin
>> Direct: 604-980-5089
>> Email: jay@lonsdalelaw.ca
>> By phone: 604-628-0508
>> By e-mail: info@jayshin.ca
>>
>> Karen Wang
>> 604.531.1178
>> karenwang@liberal.ca
>>
>> Now if Mr Shin scrolls down he will know some of what the fancy NDP
>> lawyer has known for quite sometime
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Singh - QP, Jagmeet" <JSingh-QP@ndp.on.ca>
>> Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 16:39:35 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Federal Court File # T-1557-15 and the
>> upcoming hearing on May 24th I called a lot of your people before High
>> Noon today Correct Ralph Goodale and Deputy Minister Malcolm Brown?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>> For immediate assistance please contact our Brampton office at
>> 905-799-3939 or jsingh-co@ndp.on.ca
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Kennedy.Stewart@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 18:18:35 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Minister Ralph Goodale and Pierre
>> Paul-Hus Trust that I look forward to arguing the fact that fhe Crown
>> filed my Sept 4th email to you and your buddies
>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Many thanks for your message. Your concerns are important to me. If
>> your matter is urgent, an invitation or an immigration matter please
>> forward it to burnabysouth.A1@parl.gc.ca or
>> burnabysouth.C1@parl.gc.ca. This email is no longer being monitored.
>>
>> The House of Commons of Canada provides for the continuation of
>> services to the constituents of a Member of Parliament whose seat has
>> become vacant. The party Whip supervises the staff retained under
>> these circumstances.
>>
>> Following the resignation of the Member for the constituency of
>> Burnaby South, Mr. Kennedy Stewart, the constituency office will
>> continue to provide services to constituents.
>>
>> You can reach the Burnaby South constituency office by telephone at
>> (604) 291-8863 or by mail at the following address: 4940 Kingsway,
>> Burnaby BC.
>>
>> Office Hours:
>>
>> Tuesday - Thursday: 10am - 12pm & 1pm - 4pm
>> Friday 10am - 12pm
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Michael Cohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>
>> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 05:54:40 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Blair Armitage You acted as the Usher
>> of the Black Rod twice while Kevin Vickers was the Sergeant-at-Arms
>> Hence you and the RCMP must know why I sued the Queen Correct?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
>> counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
>> directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
>> directed to 646-853-0114.
>> ________________________________
>> This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
>> thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
>> This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
>> proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
>> copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
>> recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
>> received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
>> promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
>> to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
>> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
>> or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
>> guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
>> any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
>> any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
>> represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its affiliates.
>> Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an electronic
>> signature under applicable law.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Mr. Amos,
>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>
>> Department of Justice
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Eidt, David (OAG/CPG)" <David.Eidt@gnb.ca>
>> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:33:21 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Mr Lutz howcome your buddy the clerk
>> would not file this motion and properly witnessed affidavit and why
>> did she take all four copies?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I will be out of the office until Monday, March 13, 2017. I will have
>> little to no access to email. Please dial 453-2222 for assistance.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca>
>> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:16:46 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
>> Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I will be out of the office until August 15, 2016. Je serai absent du
>> bureau jusqu'au 15 août 2016.
>>
>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Good Day Sir
>>>
>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>
>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>
>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>
>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>>>
>>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>>
>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>>>
>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>>>
>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>>>
>>>
>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>>>
>>>
>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>
>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>>>
>>>
>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>
>>> Date: 20151223
>>>
>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>
>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>
>>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>>
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>
>>> Plaintiff
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>
>>> Defendant
>>>
>>> ORDER
>>>
>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>
>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>> in its entirety.
>>>
>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>>> he stated:
>>>
>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>
>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>> Police.
>>>
>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>
>>>
>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>
>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>> Judge
>>>
>>>
>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>
>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>
>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>> most
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>>> dudes are way past too late
>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>
>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>
>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Merci ,
>>>
>>>
>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>>>
>>>
>>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>
>>> January 13, 2015
>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>
>>> December 8, 2014
>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>
>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>
>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>
>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>
>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>
>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>
>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>
>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>>
>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>
>>> Subject:
>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. $DH/MS$" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>
>>> January 30, 2007
>>>
>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>
>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>
>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>
>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>> Minister of Health
>>>
>>> CM/cb
>>>
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>
>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>
>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>
>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>
>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>
>>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
>>> ilian.html
>>>
>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>>>
>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>>>
>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>>> cards?
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
>>>> 6
>>>>
>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>>>
>>>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>>>
>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>> United States Senate
>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>
>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>> tapes.
>>>>
>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>>
>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html
>>
>>
>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>> The Supreme Court
>>
>> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do
>>
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>
>> Amos v. Canada
>> Court (s) Database
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>> Date
>>
>> 2017-10-30
>> Neutral citation
>>
>> 2017 FCA 213
>> File numbers
>>
>> A-48-16
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>
>> THE COURT
>>
>>
>>
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>
>> I. Introduction
>>
>> [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>
>> [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>
>>
>> [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
>> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>
>>
>> [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal.
>>
>>
>> II. Preliminary Matter
>>
>> [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>
>> [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>> c. F-7:
>>
>>
>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>> Appeal.
>> […]
>>
>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>> […]
>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>
>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>
>>
>> [7] However, these subsections only provide that the
>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>> section.
>> [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>> that:
>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>> matière civile et pénale.
>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>
>>
>> [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
>> appeal book.
>>
>>
>> [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>
>>
>> [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>
>>
>> [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>> such judge had a conflict.
>>
>>
>> [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>> was a member of such firm.
>>
>>
>> [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>
>>
>> [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>> [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>> apprehension of bias:
>> 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>
>> [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>> (4th) 193).
>>
>> [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
>> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>> 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>
>>
>> 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>
>>
>> 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>
>>
>> 30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>> To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>> 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>
>>
>> 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
>> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>> events from over a decade ago.
>> (emphasis added)
>>
>> [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>
>> [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>
>> [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>
>> [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>
>> [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
>> to recuse himself.
>>
>> [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>
>> [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
>> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>
>>
>> III. Issue
>>
>> [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>
>> IV. Analysis
>>
>> A. Standard of Review
>>
>> [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>
>> [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>> interfere.
>>
>>
>> B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>
>> [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>
>> 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>> (…)
>>
>>
>> 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
>> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>> [footnotes omitted].
>>
>>
>> [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>> para. 27).
>>
>>
>> [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>
>>
>> [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>
>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>
>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>>
>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>
>> [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>
>> [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>
>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>> of process…
>>
>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>
>> [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>
>> [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
>> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>> supporting a cause of action.
>>
>> [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>
>> V. Conclusion
>> [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>> without leave to amend.
>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>> J.A.
>> "David G. Near"
>> J.A.
>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>> J.A.
>>
>>
>>
>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>
>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>> DOCKET:
>>
>> A-48-16
>>
>>
>>
>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>>
>>
>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>
>> Fredericton,
>> New Brunswick
>>
>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>
>> May 24, 2017
>>
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>> DATED:
>>
>> October 30, 2017
>>
>> APPEARANCES:
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>>
>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>> (on his own behalf)
>>
>> Jan Jensen
>>
>>
>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>
>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>

David Raymond Amos Round 3

Tuesday, 22 October 2019