David R Amos Fights Back!!!
teslacoils2006
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:11:03 -0800 (PST)
From: "David Amos"
Subject:Fwd: Sgt Vaillancourt just talked byway of 506 452 3431 now I
will take a guess at his email address
To:mle...@stu.ca, jwa...@stu.ca, pl...@stu.ca, carl...@stu.ca,
oldm...@yahoo.com, kelly....@gnb.ca
http://www.charlesinthehouse.com/
Everybody knows that Chucky Leblanc wasn't the only dude covertly
banished from the Legislative Buildling. How come he get all the press
I must ask? Perhaps you should ask his old pal and your cohort Kelly
Lamrock what gives with this shit sometime N'est Pas?
Hell everyone in your University knows that I was illegally evicted
from the polling station at the Student Union Building on January 23rd.
Tell me what would Stevey Boy Harper do if that had happened to him?
Sue? Am I any less of a man than the Prime Minister.or the French man
you and your students support? Now Computer WCIE should search the
Blogs Chucky. Live by the sword. Die by the sword so to speak EH?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
http://www1.gnb.ca/legis/bios1/bio-e.asp?idNo=102&versionfiltered=e
David Amos wrote:
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:23:59 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos motomani...@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: Sgt Vaillancourt just talked byway of 506 452 3431 now I
will take a guess at his email address
To: wri...@consultant.com
David Amos wrote:
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 08:57:07 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos motomani...@yahoo.com
Subject: Sgt Vaillancourt just talked byway of 506 452 3431 now I will
take a guess at his email address
To: Stephane.v...@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, imc-ma...@riseup.net,
oldm...@yahoo.com, Bill....@gnb.ca, mary.s...@gnb.ca,
rick....@gnb.ca, jack...@gnb.ca, Bernard...@gnb.ca,
Cheryl...@gnb.ca, greg....@gnb.ca, john....@gnb.ca,
giuliano.z...@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
CC: ted...@justice.gc.ca, bel...@gnb.ca, DannyW...@gov.nl.ca,
davie...@nbpub.com, bruce.n...@gnb.ca, carl.u...@gnb.ca,
claude...@gnb.ca, mike.o...@gnb.ca, MacK...@parl.gc.ca,
Da...@parl.gc.ca, Moo...@parl.gc.ca, All...@parl.gc.ca,
Thomp...@parl.gc.ca, in...@pco-bcp.gc.ca
I warned him that I was a very fierce political animal. I also made it
clear to Sgt. Vaillancourt that I have many very justifiable reasons
not to trust any cop anymore. I will do as I said and sue the Crown
Corp known as the RCMP in the Court of the Queen's Bench in Fredericton
unless somebody doesn't act with the scope of their employment ASAP.
However I must do as I promised and file my first complaint against the
Crown in Federal Court first. In the "mean" time perhaps some local cop
in New Brunswick should simply do his job and investigate all the
material I have given to them over the years. They really stop their
bullshit about jusridiction and mandate in order to protect their
personal interests. Do they not understand that I can sue them as
individuals? There is nothing wrong with exposing the truth about my
allegations of criminal conduct in support of public corruption for the
benefit of all Canadians. Just act non paritsan and let the politcal
card fall where they may. Lawyers and politicains are infinitely
replacable and all falsly claim to be ethical as they pick our pockets.
I would love to hear my name mentioned in a very public forum even if
it was slandered. Before the Yankee elections on November 7th would be
nice EH? Politicians cops and lawyers should look to their own personal
interests and then uphold the law and the public trust placed in their
positions. After all that is their job not mine N'est Pas?
I do not have to do anything any cop or lawyer may wish to suggest
anymore. Not all Maritimers are dumb defeatists as Stevey Boy Harper
has suggested in the past. At least I am one dumb pigheaded Maritimer
who knows the differnce between my rights under the Charter and the
government's wrongs practiced against them. I also know when somebody
has falied their oath to uphold the law and protect the public
interests and I certainly know how to hold them accountable in a legal
and ethical fashion. To say you will sue someone is not a threat. It is
merely a promise. Most lawyers employ such words everyday and they
practice law for a fee.
I have taken no oath to obey other then one to my wife and an unspoken
one to my seed.. Thus I obey only my own consience and I stress test my
own integrity every day in the best interests of my Clan. It is them
whom I serve and protect without a fee because it is my duty to do so
just as cops and other public servants etc are gainfully employed to
protect us all under oath and rule of law. My family has suffered
enough over the past five years. Tis high time I sought monetary relief
from our bad acting governemnts in order to bring them home to Canada
to live in peace and escape further Yankee malice.
Anyone can check my work. Much of it still remains on file in the
public record of many Yankee courts and one Canadian one. I am certain
that anyone would agree that my Clan has had amazing patience thus far.
I say nay never no more. I have been a student of enough Canadian law
to get a good grip on the scene. It is time to put what I learned to
good use for the benefit of my Clan. EH?
I am sending three emails to Sgt Vaillancourt and his bosses to protect
my own dumb arse from more false allegations I will also use hard copy
as evidence against the RCMP in court. Clearly I have introduced him to
a few local witnesses EH? Sending these emails to most of them is truly
redundant but it is to serve my own ends in the blogs. Charles Leblanc
should know by now where to find this particular email posted within a
blog. It is easy for anyone call me a liar or crazy as a loon or even
to make the false claim that I am some kind of a criminal threat to
them. But putting the claim in writing and signng one's name to the
document is another kettle of fish. N'est Pas? Try it sometime soon. In
fact I Double Dog Dare Ya to.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
Stéphane Vaillancourt
506-452-3431
506-470-2300 (cell)
506- 558-1270 (pager)
I know for a fact it was my calls to Parliament etc in response to the
following words that made the RCMP start to do their job and call me
back.
OTTAWA - Wayne Easter, the former solicitor-general who presided during
the Arar ordeal, appeared to contradict earlier testimony from RCMP
head Giuliano Zacardelli today when he answered questions at a commons
committee.
Responding to Justice Dennis O'Connor's report on the Arar case at
the public safety and national security committee, Easter said he was
never told the RCMP had passed on false information to the United
States and was never told the RCMP tried to correct it, as claimed by
Zacardelli.
"I was not informed that the RCMP had provided inaccurate information
to the U.S.," Easter told the MPs.
When Zacardelli met with the committee in September he was asked when
he informed his minister about the RCMP's error, and he replied that
he could not recall specifically but that "briefings and timelines
started to be prepared for him as the matter came up, and we started
providing that information."
But Easter emphatically told the committee that that information never
reached him. In preparation for today's appearance Easter said he
reviewed documents, briefing notes and material he had received during
his tenure on the Arar case and met with his staff in order to have a
clear timeline of what he knew and when.
In two briefing notes from October and November of 2002, Easter said,
"There was no reference to errors in information, no reference to
false information, nor was there any reference to any corrective
efforts having been made by the RCMP with respect to any of the
information which may have been shared."
The same was true in briefings given in June and July of the following
year, Easter testified.
Giving further evidence he was in the dark abut the erroneous
information passed on to the U.S., Easter said the issue was never
raised with him by his American counterpart Attorney General John
Ashcroft. Presumably when American investigators learned they had false
information on Arar, Ashcroft would have been briefed on that
information, Easter said, and he believes Ashcroft would have shared
that with him.
"Attorney General Ashcroft...would have undoubtedly raised that point
with me," Easter said.Asked whether he would have acted differently
had he known earlier that Arar had no terrorist links, Easter said he
didn't want to answer hypothetical questions.
Maher Arar, a Canadian citizen, was arrested in the United States in
2002, and sent to his native Syria where he was imprisoned for a year
and endured torture before being released without charge.
The committee is planning to recall Zacardelli to clarify his initial
testimony and he will likely be asked about the contradictions provided
today by his former political boss.
© CanWest News Service 2006
Here is a little proof of how much I study my political opponents.
Cya'll in Court :(.
http://cmte.parl.gc.ca/cmte/CommitteePublication.aspx?SourceId=96766
David Amos wrote:
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 06:12:58 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos motomani...@yahoo.com
Subject: Say hey to Wayne Easter and the equally dumb Newfy lawyers Rob
Moore and Andrew House for me will ya?
To: Guim...@parl.gc.ca
David Amos wrote:
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 09:27:30 -0800 (PST)From: David Amos
motomani...@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: Maybe old Zack will explain to the kids the Federal
Criminal Code I quoted within this email
To: mcc...@nbnet.nb.ca
David Amos wrote:
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 11:13:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomani...@yahoo.com
Subject: Maybe old Zack will explain to the kids the Federal Criminal
Code I quoted within this email
To: handsof...@yahoo.ca, gc...@citizenspress.org,
oldm...@yahoo.com, ottawar...@yahoo.ca,
giuliano.z...@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
David Amos wrote:
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomani...@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: Keep reading Ms. Roche
To: bal...@psac.com
David Amos wrote:
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:03:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomani...@yahoo.com
Subject: Keep reading Ms. Roche
To: lorrai...@gov.nl.ca, sampe...@hotmail.com,
oldehi...@hotmail.com, Ma...@ci.milford.ct.us,
steveng...@yahoo.com, City...@ci.milford.ct.us,
jim....@cga.ct.gov, judicia...@cga.ct.gov,
kevin...@po.state.ct.us, let...@courant.com,
carmen....@jud.state.ct.us, john.d...@jud.state.ct.us,
mlev...@globe.com
CC: in...@nedlamont.com, Kathleen Dickson , in...@joe2006.com,
Knibbs...@juno.com, harol...@fordfortennessee.com,
st...@destefanoforct.com, in...@votethornton.com,
ralphf...@sbcglobal.net, comm...@joecourtney.com,
camp...@murphyforcongress.org, gre...@ctgreens.org,
mel...@bobfarr.com
Just so the Newfys and the Yankees all know, it was Jim Case of the
Newfoundland Constabulary (Rarespade) who told me that he saw Whitey
Bulger hanging around his town of St. John's when I was preparing to
come home to run for a seat in Parliament in 2004 and do a little
bounty hunting on the side. No shit ask Byron Prior or Premier Danny
Williams etc..
Sam Perrier wrote:
From: "Sam Perrier" sampe...@hotmail.com
To: motomani...@yahoo.comSubject:
RE: Fwd: What say you now Jacky Boy Layton? Cat still got your tongue?
Shame onyou. You likely walked past Byron Prior again today
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:36:35 -0230
HOLY SHIT DAVID, THE SCUMBAGS MUST BE CHEWING ON THEIR BOOT STRAPS.
I SENT YOU ANOTHER FAX, ITS VERY INTERESTING, I KNOW YOU WILL GET A
CHUCKEL OUT OF IT.
KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK, MAYBE SOMEDAY SOMEONE WITH A BIT OF DECENCY WILL
INVESTIGATE BYRON'S SITUATION AND TAKE ACTION, ITWILL ONLY TAKE ONE RAT
TO LEAVE THE BURNING BARN SQUEALING AND THE OTHERS WILL FOLLOW TO SAVE
THEIR ASSES.
SAM.
From: David Amos motomani...@yahoo.com
To: Hea...@parl.gc.ca, Byr...@parl.gc.ca, kqu...@nb.aibn.com,
rjba...@forbesrothbasque.nb.ca, d...@barryspalding.com,
cb...@cbanb.com, albe...@umoncton.ca, de...@law.ualberta.ca,
bobi...@law.ubc.ca, law...@ucalgary.ca, comm...@michaelignatieff.ca,
in...@bobrae.ca, law...@osgoode.yorku.ca, law...@dal.ca,
daniel....@uottawa.ca
CC: ps...@ccs.carleton.ca, andre....@fd.ulaval.ca,
harvey...@umanitoba.ca, dean...@mcgill.ca,
anne-mari...@umontreal.ca, mockle...@uqam.ca,
w.fla...@queensu.ca, brent....@usask.ca,
daniel....@usherbrooke.ca, mayo....@utoronto.ca,
de...@law.uvic.ca, cbr...@uwo.ca, bel...@uwindsor.ca
Subject: Fwd: What say you now Jacky Boy Layton? Cat still got your
tongue? Shame on you. You likely walked past Byron Prior again today
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:41:18 -0700 (PDT)
David Amos wrote:
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:49:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomani...@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: What say you now Jacky Boy Layton? Cat still got your
tongue? Shame on you. You likely walked past Byron Prior again today
To: gr...@currentmag.ca, lo...@straylight.ca, ed_ho...@hotmail.com,
mge...@uottawa.ca, DannyW...@gov.nl.ca, tomma...@gov.nl.ca,
Matth...@parl.gc.ca, Sim...@parl.gc.ca, Russ...@parl.gc.ca,
Mann...@parl.gc.ca, Moo...@parl.gc.ca
CC: oldm...@yahoo.com, jacques...@cbc.ca, Deb_...@cbc.ca,
spin...@hotmail.com, Duane.R...@unb.ca, ndp...@nbnet.nb.ca,
mack...@canada.com, Polit...@hotmail.com, oldmais...@gmail.com,
advocacyc...@yahoo.com, dch...@atlanticbusinessmagazine.com,
cj...@nbnet.nb.ca, ne...@kingscorecord.com, ne...@dailygleaner.com,
kcarm...@bloomberg.net, davie...@nbpub.com,
urquha...@telegraphjournal.com
Hey Greg
As you scroll down to the both of the email you see that Stevey Boy
Harper byway of the Privy Council's reply to me can never deny that
he don't know all about Byron Prior and I now. As if he ever could
EH? As I told you on the phone this morning, methinks if anyone truly
wishes to know the truth of all that you ask you should Google the name
of Byron Prior and that of mine as well it is as I said David Raymond
Amos. Better yet pick up the phone and call my cell # anytime after 8
pm in the Maritimes and I will take you down the path through the
Garden of Good and Evil that will leave you staggering under the weight
of the awful truth. As you could tell I am not a shy man. What you may
not know is that I am never reckless with the awful truth. My number is
506 434 1379.
I must say I found it rather hard to believe that a journalist in St
John's Newfoundland has not heard of the name Byron Prior by now. I
will allow you the license to claim that you have never heard of me and
that federal politics is not your forte. However no Newfy who claims to
be a journalist is that dumb or out of touch of the local political
scene to not know of the lawsuit between the MP Billy Matthews and
Byron Prior on file in the Supreme Court of Newfoundland. You write
books. Perhaps you should find Martha Jette's book about Byron and
write one of your own. Rest assured I will mention both of you in mine.
I ain't shy about naming names and calling a spade a spade pursuant
to the following federal code. One sort of spade I will name is
Constable Jim Case of the Newfy Constabulary. He used the name
rarespade for his email address as he tortured Byron Prior for years.
Hell he even told me saw Whitey Bulger in downtown St. John's back in
2004. You should know how to read as well as write
EH? Check the law. Byron and his friend Paul Perrier have done nothing
wrong. But the people acting against them certainly have. EH?
Criminal Code PART VIII: OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON AND REPUTATION
Defamatory Libel
315. No person shall be deemed to publish a defamatory libel by reason
only that he publishes defamatory matter in good faith for the purpose
of seeking remedy or redress for a private or public wrong or grievance
from a person who has, or who on reasonable grounds he believes has,
the right or is under an obligation to remedy or redress the wrong or
grievance, if
(a) he believes that the defamatory matter is true;
(b) the defamatory matter is relevant to the remedy or redress that is
sought; and
(c) the defamatory matter does not in any respect exceed what is
reasonably sufficient in the circumstances.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 279.
You should also know as well as I that people often fail ethical stress
tests when it concerns their own interests. It seemed to strange me
that you claim on your own website that you know and write of many
things but on the phone to you try hard to play dumb. As you could no
doubt tell, I gave up on you rather promptly. I see no need to argue on
my dime. I am accustomed to that kind of double talk from lawyers and
journalists alike when they do not want to know anymore. Obviously the
lawyer Michael Geist is both because of the fact he loves to blog about
all that he knows. His silence speaks volumes to me.. I contacted him
and the Newfy Constabulary etc as soon as I read his post and the words
of Paul Perrier recorded by CBC.. So much or for the ethics of
professors who expound of the law EH? Clearly the cat or Stevey Boy
Harper has got that Upper Canadian lawyer's tongue. If Geist is so
adept with the internet, he should know everything there is to know
about Byron Prior and I by now. Clearly I have been studying
him. Methinks the Dean of his Law School will have a shit fit in short
order after I approach the kids they teach about ethical conduct etc. I
think Byron Prior who is in Ottawa once again should go ask that
lawyer/professor of Canada's so called University some questions
about publishing the truth on the internet face to face in front of his
students. What say you?
.
http://www.michaelgeist.ca/component/option,com_tags/task,view/tag,email+spoof/
Geist says this of himself. And I inserted both of your Bios in this
email in order to stress test your ethics as well
I am a law professor at the University of Ottawa where I hold the
Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law. My current
contact information is included below:
University of Ottawa
Faculty of LawCommon Law Section
57 Louis Pasteur
Box 450, Stn. A
Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5
Canada
(613) 562-5800 extension 3319
mge...@uottawa.ca
It appears by way of CBC reporting of Paul Perrier and the following
comment by the Current and others has caused Byron Prior to finally
break the ice of his matters in the corporate controlled media. Hooray
for Paul Perrier. He did what needed to be done. I wish I had thought
of it first. As you shall see he clearly told the truth of what he was
doing and why. The fact that I understood his game and supported his
efforts out of the gate must have Danny williams panties in quite a
knot EH?. Ask yourself why nobody mentions me. Paul Perrier is one man
with sand and lots of integrity whom I will stand behind until hell
freezes over. Look for these words in my own blog Greg.
I hope that Paul Perrier does not trust lawyers and the corrupt the
Justice System in Newfoundland to protect his rights and interests.
Clearly Danny Williams and his cohorts ignore the law all day long.
Here is a couple Danny Boy should review before he supports the false
imprisonment of another man from the Maritimes. I am going to sue Danny
Boy anyway ask his attorney General Tommy Boy Marshall why if you
don't already know.
Criminal Code PART IV: OFFENCES AGAINST THE ADMINISTRATION OF LAW AND
JUSTICE Corruption and Disobedience
126. (1) Every one who, without lawful excuse, contravenes an Act of
Parliament by wilfully doing anything that it forbids or by wilfully
omitting to do anything that it requires to be done is, unless a
punishment is expressly provided by law, guilty of an indictable
offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years.
2) Any proceedings in respect of a contravention of or conspiracy to
contravene an Act mentioned in subsection (1), other than this Act, may
be instituted at the instance of the Government of Canada and conducted
by or on behalf of that Government.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 126; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 185(F).
Criminal Code PART VIII: OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON AND REPUTATION
Duties Tending to Preservation of Life
217.1 Every one who undertakes, or has the authority, to direct how
another person does work or performs a task is under a legal duty to
take reasonable steps to prevent bodily harm to that person, or any
other person, arising from that work or task.
2003, c. 21, s. 3
Methinks it is the spoken word of honest common men not VOCM in
Newfoundland as they gossip about Danny Williams and his cohorts that
will save Paul Perrier from malicious prosecution. I say that Paul
Perrier did the right thing and that his only offence is to be a minor
nuisance to some very major crooks. Canada needs more men like the man
the Current has labeled a hero.
Greg this comment on your post within the Current is emailed to you not
posted because I am not a member of your blog nor do I wish to be, You
have explained to me that the posting was written by someone else but
you are the only contact person.. I find that the post is an
interesting stress test of the Ethics of the CBC and the Justice System
in Newfoundland as a whole by what appears to be an Independent News
organization.. I truly did think by your outfit's name that your were
associated with CBC. Please feel free to post my comment to your post
and ask me anything you wish in the hope that I can force CBC to obey
its mandate. but computers never do. It seems that only machines are
capable of acting within the scope of their employment eh? I will
forward the two emails that were spoofed about Danny Williams and the
NTV as well. Obviously I forwarded this email and the two offending
emails to Byron Prior Danny Boy and the NTV and that have made you a
witness not only to malicious prosecution but to my own pending
complaints as well. It is who that is in the Bcc box
and those I forward this email to afterwards that only the Feds and me
will know that should cause you the most concern as I stress test your
ethics to the max.. Trust that some will respond to this email and
bounce it back to me for my records because I am up to something most
folks will not believe. Truth is stranger than fiction and I am about
to prove it once more.
Many people consider me crazy or worse yet a criminal. However they can
never deny that I ran for a Seat in Parliament twice and in two
provincial elections thus far. The false allegations and the simple
facts do not fit together very well. I must have been slandered EH?
Many people know the reason that a man who has never voted in his life
decided to become a very fierce political animal but nobody will say my
name not even Byron Prior because it seems my affairs are very scary
indeed. To date not one person other than my brother in law, Norfolk
County Deputy Sheriff Robert F. O'Meara has been willing to call me a
liar and put it in writing. Many people joke and liken me to the Mel
Gibson or some other character in a Hollywood movie and suggest I write
a book. Well my life ain't no movie and methinks I should continue
living in order to finish the god damned book. Methinks a lot of
lawyers and cops will regret that they did not pay better attention to
the laws they swore to uphold once the truth of my matters become
public knowledge. EH? Everybody knows that there is no honour amongst
thieves. Soon or later I will break the ice as well Won't I Mr.
Geist?
Criminal Code PART XIII: ATTEMPTS - CONSPIRACIES - ACCESSORIES
465. (1) Except where otherwise expressly provided by law, the
following provisions apply in respect of conspiracy:
(a) every one who conspires with any one to commit murder or to cause
another person to be murdered, whether in Canada or not, is guilty of
an indictable offence and liable to a maximum term of imprisonment for
life;
(b) every one who conspires with any one to prosecute a person for an
alleged offence, knowing that he did not commit that offence, is guilty
of an indictable offence and liable
(i) to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years, if the alleged
offence is one for which, on conviction, that person would be liable to
be sentenced to imprisonment for life or for a term not exceeding
fourteen years, or
(ii) to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, if the
alleged offence is one for which, on conviction, that person would be
liable to imprisonment for less than fourteen years;
(c) every one who conspires with any one to commit an indictable
offence not provided for in paragraph (a) or (b) is guilty of an
indictable offence and liable to the same punishment as that to which
an accused who is guilty of that offence would, on conviction, be
liable; and
(d) every one who conspires with any one to commit an offence
punishable on summary conviction is guilty of an offence punishable on
summary conviction.
(2) [Repealed, 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 61]
(3) Every one who, while in Canada, conspires with any one to do
anything referred to in subsection (1) in a place outside Canada that
is an offence under the laws of that place shall be deemed to have
conspired to do that thing in Canada.
(4) Every one who, while in a place outside Canada, conspires with any
one to do anything referred to in subsection (1) in Canada shall be
deemed to have conspired in Canada to do that thing.
(5) Where a person is alleged to have conspired to do anything that is
an offence by virtue of subsection (3) or (4), proceedings in respect
of that offence may, whether or not that person is in Canada, be
commenced in any territorial division in Canada, and the accused may be
tried and punished in respect of that offence in the same manner as if
the offence had been committed in that territorial division.
(6) For greater certainty, the provisions of this Act relating to
(a) requirements that an accused appear at and be present during
proceedings, and
(b) the exceptions to those requirements,
apply to proceedings commenced in any territorial division pursuant to
subsection (5).
(7) Where a person is alleged to have conspired to do anything that is
an offence by virtue of subsection (3) or (4) and that person has been
tried and dealt with outside Canada in respect of the offence in such a
manner that, if the person had been tried and dealt with in Canada, he
would be able to plead autrefois acquit, autrefois convict or pardon,
the person shall be deemed to have been so tried and dealt with in
Canada.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 465; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 61;
1998, c. 35, s. 121.
Criminal Code PART XIII: ATTEMPTS - CONSPIRACIES - ACCESSORIES
463. Except where otherwise expressly provided by law, the following
provisions apply in respect of persons who attempt to commit or are
accessories after the fact to the commission of offences:
(a) every one who attempts to commit or is an accessory after the fact
to the commission of an indictable offence for which, on conviction, an
accused is liable to be sentenced to imprisonment for life is guilty of
an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not
exceeding fourteen years;
(b) every one who attempts to commit or is an accessory after the fact
to the commission of an indictable offence for which, on conviction, an
accused is liable to imprisonment for fourteen years or less is guilty
of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term that is
one-half of the longest term to which a person who is guilty of that
offence is liable;
(c) every one who attempts to commit or is an accessory after the fact
to the commission of an offence punishable on summary conviction is
guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction; and
(d) every one who attempts to commit or is an accessory after the fact
to the commission of an offence for which the offender may be
prosecuted by indictment or for which he is punishable on summary
conviction
(i) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a
term not exceeding a term that is one-half of the longest term to which
a person who is guilty of that offence is liable, or
(ii) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 463; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.), s. 59;
1998, c. 35, s. 120.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
P.S. If the people at the Current were truly wise they would
investigate a really big scoop that no other media has reported on.
That said it would not behoove the Current to delete their comment
within their own Blog. I already saved a digital copy of the webpage in
my reliable little old computer. If they do so it is just another piece
of evidence I will employ against the Crown and use to question the
Current about why they questioned something one day then ignored the
obvious answer a few days later.
Greg says this of himself
Greg has more than twenty years experience as a professional
photographer, journalist and editor. His work has appeared in
publications and news agencies such as Macleans, Equinox, Canadian
Geographic, Reuters, The Globe & Mail, Forbes, Time, Businessweek,
Readers Digest, Toronto Star, Canadian Busness, Utne Reader, Men's
Health and der Spiegel as well as commercial work for corporate clients
including Mobil Oil, Chevron, Texas Instuments, Bank of Montreal,
Canadian Bar Association, Petro Canada, Medecins sans Frontieres,
Canadian International Development Agency, Newfoundland Hydro, Parks
Canada, Kodak Europe and McClelland & Stewart, Canada.
His assignments have taken him from the ice floes and offshore oil
fields of the North Atlantic to the civil wars of The Balkans and the
conflicts in Central Africa. Locke is equally comfortable working in
the corporate boardroom as he is remote field locations.
Dr. Michael Geist does brag a great deal more EH?
Dr. Geist has written numerous academic articles and government reports
on the Internet and law and is a columnist on technology law issues
that regularly appears in media outlets on five continents including
North America (the Toronto Star and Ottawa Citizen), South America
(Santiago Times), Europe (BBC), Asia (South China Morning Post), and
Africa (Kenya's Daily Nation). He is the creator and consulting editor
of BNA's Internet Law News, a daily Internet law news service, editor
of the monthly newsletters, Internet and E-commerce Law in Canada and
the Canadian Privacy Law Review (Butterworths), the founder of the
Ontario Research Network for E-commerce, on the advisory boards of
several leading Internet law publications including Electronic Commerce
& Law Report (BNA), the Journal of Internet Law (Aspen) and Internet
Law and Business (Computer Law Reporter). He is the author of the
textbook Internet Law in Canada (Captus Press) which is now in its
third edition, and the editor of In the Public Interest: The Future of
Canadian Copyright Law, published in 2005 by Irwin Law.
Dr. Geist's work has been recognized with several important awards and
grants including the 2002 Canadian Association of Law Teachers
Scholarly Paper Award and a major research grants from the Social
Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for work on Internet
jurisdiction and copyright law. In 2003, Dr. Geist became the first law
professor to receive the Ontario Premier Research Excellence Award,
obtained a significant grant from Amazon.com to establish Canada first
technology law public interest litigation clinic at the University of
Ottawa, was named one of Canada Top 40 Under 40, and received the
Public Leadership Award from Canarie for his contribution to the
Internet in Canada.
Dr. Geist serves on the director and advisory boards of several
Internet and IT law organizations including the Canadian Internet
Registration Authority , the dot-ca administrative agency, and the
Public Interest Registry , which manages the dot-org domain. He was a
member of Canada's National Task Force on Spam and is the former
chair of a global Internet jurisdiction project for the American Bar
Association and International Chamber of Commerce. He is regularly
quoted in the national and international media on Internet law issues
and has appeared before government committees on e-commerce policy.
Lots of people were talking then they all seemed to shut up EH?
Lets see it I can get the gossips going once again EH?
Greg's crowd said this in my humble opinion it is the best piece of
gossip yet.
The Great Danny Williams E-mail Caper.
by Greg Locke on Sun 17 Sep 2006 08:21 PM NDT
"It is dead easy to originate email that appears to be from anyone you
choose" by Sylvia Chafe
CURRENTMAYBE IT'S JUST ME, but I've been surprised at the lack of
discussion about the reported spoofing of Premier Danny Williams'
email address. I think there are some things that should be
discussed.As reported in the media, here's how the events unfolded,
with a little editorializing from myself. In the early hours of August
1, email messages purportedly from Premier Danny Williams began
arriving in email inboxes in the provincial government. The messages
contained derogatory statements pertaining to the premier himself.
Panicked and evidently clueless on how to read a simple email header,
someone thought Danny's government email account had been hacked and
decided that the provincial government's email system had to be shut
down. Shut down it was, and for several hours email addressed to the
government bounced or sat in queues for later delivery. The RNC was
brought in to track down the culprit. Within a couple of days charges
were laid against a St. John's man, who later publicly claimed
responsibility. To judge from the interview CBC Radio's morning show
did with him, the fact that he pulled this off is a testament to how
easy it is to spoof email addresses.Shutting down a government's
email system because of a spoofed email that almost anyone who has ever
looked at an email header would identify as having originated outside
government's network strikes me as quite an over-reaction. Only two
possible explanations come to mind, and I don't like either of them.
One is that there was a lot more to this than we have been told about.
The other, more likely, explanation is that there was a complete
disconnect between the people making the decisions and the people (most
of whom are quite competent) who actually run the systems. One might
also wonder why messages pretending to be from addresses inside the
government's network would be accepted from the outside, since they
would be obvious forgeries.
Presumably lessons have been learned and changes made.What bothers me
most about this, however, is that there seems to be one law that
applies when the Premier is victimized and another for everyone else.
It is dead easy to originate email that appears to be from anyone you
choose. Danny, for example. Just get an email address and fill in the
blanks. Even better, if you put their email address in the "Reply To"
field, responses to the messages you send as them go to their email
address. This was evidently what our hero in this story intended: to
flood the Premier's inbox with reply messages. Ironically, it is
unlikely that Danny himself would have seen any of the replies, until
one was brought to him as a sample (it also wouldn't surprise me if
Danny was not aware of the decision to shut down the government's
email system or call the cops).
Most likely our hero used the address published on the Internet for the
Premier (Pre...@gov.nl.ca) as opposed to the address he actually uses.
No doubt some unfortunate assistant to an Executive Assistant has the
privilege of sifting through the tsunami of spam that washes in
there.Your email address has almost certainly been spoofed by spammers
and/or as a result of a virus activity on a computer where your address
was stored. What do you think would be the reaction if you called Fort
Townsend to file a complaint? Right! You would hear them laughing in
Harbour Grace.So why is it that when Danny's email address is spoofed
it warrants chewing up scarce police resources, including the RNC
Economic Crime Unit and the RCMP Integrated Technical Crime Unit? Not
to mention time of the courts. No sane person who read that spoofed
email message could possibly have believed it was sent by Premier
Williams. (I'll bet you have received spam from Brad Pitt - do you
think he actually
sent it?) Yes it was offensive,and quite possibly libellous. But Danny
should have access to the same remedies as you and me: a private
investigation and a civil suit. And the cops should be spending their
valuable time chasing real criminals.
Greg Locke
4 Meighen Street,
St. John's, Newfoundland.
Canada. A1A2M4
Tel: +1.709.738.4237
Mobile: +1.709.685..4710
E-mail: lo...@straylight.ca
There is an interesting comment within this blog though before the news
got worse.
Worth the cash: Paul Wells on the Premier's meeting
It's been a while since Paul Wells' columns at Macleans gained a link
from here.Long overdue sez many and I'd agree.So here's a link to his
most recent online column (at macleans.ca) in which Paul points out
that the Premiers' recent meeting in St. John's was a dismal failure.
Oh no. I fear I have fallen into the mocking tone that sometimes
provokes a letter of rebuke from Benoit Pelletier, the Quebec
intergovernmental-affairs minister, who plays the same role in the
Council of the Federation that the former Cardinal Ratzinger once
played in the Vatican: stern-eyed guardian of doctrine and lecturer of
apostates. How could you take glee from the provinces' hardship? How
does Canada benefit when the provinces lose? Doo-dah, doo-dah. But in
fact, the provinces, understood as places where Canadians live and
consent to be governed, are fine. Eight of them are in budget surplus.
All enjoy near-record low interest rates and unemployment. It's the
"provinces" -- understood as jumped-up satrapies whose potentates get
to tell the governments of Brazil and China how to trade, as a break
from telling the government of Canada how to
budget -- that had a bad couple of days in St. John's.
Good thing Paul didn't say something about Danny. Then it wouldn't be
an ersatz Ratzinger sending e-mails.Nope.The Premier's personal
publicist might pick up the phone or, if the slight was grievous
enough, the thin-skinned Prem himself would give you a ring. It's
another thing Danny picked up from Brian one day when they were playing
golf together.There'd be no chance of spoofing one of those
calls.Nosirreee.BTW, speaking of spoofing e-mails: if any one of the
eighty people or so who got e-mails purportedly from the Premier's
e-mail address actually thought that an address saying
"pre...@gov.nl.ca" was the real thing, then none of those 80 people
ever got an e-mail from the real account. Apparently, they also
completely missed that the content defamed the Premier hisself.lookit,
people. A spoof has to mimic not merely the address of the sender but
the content typically sent from that address. A real spoof is one of
those supposedly from your bank or eBay asking for your account number
and password. People get fooled because they look real.If people
actually though this fake e-mail came from The Danny, then they likely
had never seen a real one.If the computer nerds shut down the e-mail
system on the off-chance these were real, then those guys need to
re-evaluate the security system of the government
computers.Seriously.The shareware obviously ain't cutting it.But I
digress.As for Paul Wells, when all is done, head over to Inkless
Wells, Paul's blog. It is - as usual - an eclectic mix of comments on
everything from failing printers to Iggy the erstwhile Liberal leader
to a devastating - but brief - review of the Miami Vice movie.Biting.
Funny. Worldly. Thoughtful.Paul Wells.What every blogger
wants to be when they grow up.
posted by Ed Hollett at 8/03/2006 09:00:00 AM
What words of Paul Perrier that managed to be repeated are the best
read of all.
.Again I say Hooray for Paul and shame on Danny Boy Williams. His law
firm once represented Byron Prior before he became the Premier of
Newfoundland
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/newfoundland-labrador/story/2006/08/10/spoof-emails.html
Man claims he spoofed premier's e-mail address
Last Updated: Thursday, August 10, 2006 9:50 AM NT
CBC News
The Royal Newfoundland Constabulary has charged a 38-year-old St.
John's man for mimicking the e-mail address of Newfoundland and
Labrador Premier Danny Williams.
The province shut down its e-mail system for several hours last week
when it discovered that someone had been sending e-mails from what
appeared to be the premier's account.
However, a short time after pulling the plug on the government's e-mail
system, the messages were discovered to be a ruse. Officials said the
person who sent the messages was unable to read the premier's e-mails
or access sensitive information.
Police said Wednesday that a man was formally charged last week with
one count of mischief in relation to the incident.
While police have not named the individual, Paul Perrier said this week
that he is the man responsible.
"Last week I was the man, basically, who made the front page of the
Evening [sic] Telegram," said Perrier.
Man plans to plead not guilty
Perrier claimed he sent an e-mail containing nasty and wild accusations
about Premier Danny Williams last week and he said he made it look like
it came from the premier's account. He added it was a ploy to draw
attention to children's issues.
"I want to rattle this guy's chain, that's why I sent out this spoof
e-mail," said Perrier.
"I never cracked into no system or anything like that. It was just a
little basic program I used to make it look like it came from the
premier's e-mail."
The provincial government said about 80 employees and an unknown number
of outside accounts actually received the message.
Perrier, however, claimed the actual number is a lot higher. He said he
went to random websites and picked thousands of addresses.
"Well, I had a list of about 44- or 45,000 e-mails, I suppose," said
Perrier.
"I got about 50- to 55,000 out of it, I suppose."
While Perrier claimed he sent the e-mails, he said he is going to plead
not guilty to mischief at his court appearance in September.
The police said an investigation is still underway by the RNC's
economic crime unit and the RCMP's integrated technical crime unit.
A spokesperson for the RNC said police are not ruling out further
charges.
Perhaps everybody should read on and give their Member of Parliament in
Ottawa a call before the Newfys prosecute the wrong man again. Ask the
Parliamentarians to look out the window and inquire about the Newfy
Byron Prior who has been protesting against them on the lawn since the
39th Parliament first sat.
What do you think Sam is this worth passing on?
David Amos wrote:
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomani...@yahoo.com
Subject: What say you now Jacky Boy Layton? Cat still got your tongue?
Shame on you. You likely walked past Byron Prior again today
To: "Ciavarra, Louis M." , racing.c...@state.ma.us,
dwa...@web.net, genera...@thomson.com, tracy....@pcparty.org,
Harp...@parl.gc.ca, aham...@casselsbrock.com, Layt...@parl.gc.ca,
Duce...@parl.gc.ca, Mart...@parl.gc.ca, Sco...@parl.gc.ca,
gra...@grahamsteele.ca, michae...@ns.sympatico.ca,
jeff.m...@gnb.ca, jus...@gov.nl.ca, in...@apex.gc.ca
CC: Kand...@mindspring.com, fbi...@leo.gov,
josie....@dfait-maeci.gc.ca, alicia.m...@state.ma.us,
in...@pco-bcp.gc.ca, ted...@justice.gc.ca, Cotl...@parl.gc.ca,
lgold.b...@b-l.com, Rep.LindaD...@Hou.State.MA.US,
Rep.Mich...@Hou.State.MA.US, can...@canadianembassy.org,
brend...@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca,
Grant....@gnb.ca, Byron
Subject: RE: Byron
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:50:33 -0400
From: "Info, Info"
To: "Info, Info" , "David Amos" motomani...@yahoo.com
Thank you for your message to the Privy Council Office. We will reply
to you as soon as possible.Merci d'avoir communiqué avec le Bureau du
Conseil privé. Nous vous répondrons aussitôt que
possible.
David Amos wrote:
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 12:46:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomani...@yahoo.com
Subject: Patience Depupty Robert F. O'Meara don't get your panties in a
knot check your email
To: Bob , thee_s...@hotmail.com, mcha...@mta.ca,
lemisa...@hotmail.com, dess...@unbsj.ca,
bernard...@mcinnescooper.com, dmno...@coxhanson.ca,
gen...@pub.nb.ca, bryan....@ualberta.ca,
mcf...@hoover.stanford.edu, ma...@ci.boston.ma.us,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, Russell_...@feingold.senate.gov,
stephen...@wilmerhale.com, govern...@nh.gov
CC: BBAC...@bowditch.com, bbi...@burnslev.com,
drose...@burnslev.com, thomas....@state.ma.us,
Daniel...@state.ma.us, lcamp...@ledger.com,
Kand...@mindspring.com, jmu...@ibc.ca,
tomp....@atlanticradio.rogers.com, dwa...@web.net, du...@ctv.ca,
tr...@hotmail.com, Govern...@po.state.ct.us, fbi...@leo.gov
How is your cyber game going Sandman? The fatlady sings tonight EH?
Bob wrote:
Here we go again, with the frauds and the forgeries. Didn't work then,
won't work now. Here's Dave before the judge,,,,,,But your honor since
when do I have to own something to claim it for myself. Fuck you, Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Bob ; thee_s...@hotmail.com ; mcha...@mta.ca ;
lemisa...@hotmail.com ; dess...@unbsj.ca ;
bernard...@mcinnescooper.com ; dmno...@coxhanson.ca ;
gen...@pub.nb.ca ; bryan....@ualberta.ca ;
mcf...@hoover.stanford.edu ; ma...@ci.boston.ma.us ;
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov ; Russell_...@feingold.senate.gov ;
stephen...@wilmerhale.com ; govern...@nh.gov
Cc: BBAC...@bowditch.com ; bbi...@burnslev.com ;
drose...@burnslev.com ; thomas....@state.ma.us ;
Daniel...@state.ma.us ; lcamp...@ledger.com ;
Kand...@mindspring.com ; jmu...@ibc.ca ;
tomp....@atlanticradio.rogers.com ; dwa...@web.net ; du...@ctv.ca ;
tr...@hotmail.com ; Govern...@po.state.ct.us ; fbi...@leo.gov
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 12:26 PM
Subject: I sense another challenge from Norfolk County Deputy Sheriff
Robert F. O'Meara
I will forward just one email between Barry Bachrach a long long time
ago that I am certian he and my G.A.L. Brian Bixby will never wish to
explain in a Yankee Fedeal Court way down in Dixieland or the Court of
the Queen's Bench in Canada. The attachment in the following email is
merely two slips of paper. Clearly I did not file two notices of
appearance in the same yankee court two days in a row, The second
document bears my signature but it is obviously a fraudulent document
created by Depupty Dog's lawyer Angela K. Troccoli and the Commonwealth
of Massachusetts.
Prime minister Harper and all his underlings are going to have a hard
time explaining why they supported the malicious actions of Yankees as
he tries to ram his Accountability Act through Parliament.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
Bob <wicked...@adelphia.net> wrote:
I could care less about any town in your country. Hi Sam,,,Hi
George,,,,,,,,,you know Dave"I'm gonna sue ya" Amos ? Biggest arsehole
in two countries. Hey,,,,,I hear that your family is tired of you.
Hmmmm, what a shame. Again, fuck you, Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: wicked...@adelphia.net ; george....@nb.ca ;
sampe...@hotmail.com
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 10:14 AM
Subject: Sam and george meet Norfolk County Deputy sheriff Robert F.
O'Meara
That dumb crooked Yankee is my brother in in law. Obviously he does not
even know the difference between one town in Newfoundland and another
in New Brunswick. Trust that he has no idea what I am up to but
methinks his lawyers wish that he would shut up EH?
Bob <wicked...@adelphia.net> wrote:
From: "Bob" <wicked...@adelphia.net>
To: "David Amos" <motomani...@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Who thinks the dumb crooks in Saint John have one clue
what I am up to?
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 09:58:43 -0400
Why should the dumb crooks in St. John have a clue as to what you are
up to. You don't have a clue to what you are up to. For that matter, no
one cares what you are up to. Fuck You, Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: thee_s...@hotmail.com ; mcha...@mta.ca ;
lemisa...@hotmail.com ; dess...@unbsj.ca ;
bernard...@mcinnescooper.com ; dmno...@coxhanson.ca ;
gen...@pub.nb.ca ; bryan....@ualberta.ca ;
mcf...@hoover.stanford.edu ; ma...@ci.boston.ma.us ;
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov ; Russell_...@feingold.senate.gov ;
stephen...@wilmerhale.com ; govern...@nh.gov
Cc: BBAC...@bowditch.com ; bbi...@burnslev.com ;
drose...@burnslev.com ; thomas....@state.ma.us ;
wicked...@adelphia.net ; Daniel...@state.ma.us ;
lcamp...@ledger.com ; Kand...@mindspring.com ; jmu...@ibc.ca ;
tomp....@atlanticradio.rogers.com ; dwa...@web.net ; du...@ctv.ca ;
tr...@hotmail.com ; Govern...@po.state.ct.us ; fbi...@leo.gov
Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2006 9:07 PM
Subject: Fwd: Who thinks the dumb crooks in Saint John have one clue
what I am up to?
Tommorrow is polling day up here and after it is primary day down in
the Yankee neck of the woods. Just for the record I should tell my
former Yankee lawyer Barry Bachrach that I have a pretty good idea who
murdered Anna Mae but the witness up here is too chicken to talk about
it. Whereas our latest Attorney General Vic Teows has given John Graham
the boot to Yankeedoddleland there ain't much I can do to help him now
until I have my own malicious warrants for arrest removed EH?
Furthermore why the Hell should I care anymore. As soon as i get back
to the USA I am going to sue your law firm and Brian Bixby's for your
assistance to the Commonweath of Massachusetts in the screwing of my
wife for the benefit of a bunch of bad acting bankers, Gays and
Catholic priests etc.
As far as the shit going down up here, obviously Byron Prior is asking
for my support once again and I obliged but I also know where the Agent
Orange barrels are stashed in Gagetown (right by the Shirley dump which
is near Fire Point # 4). Plus obviously I am the only person willing to
say that the testing of Corridor Resources has caused the folks in the
area to lose their water and for the mine to spring many leaks as well.
Everybody but me is too afraid of being sued to state the simple truth
about that simple fact. However Barry and a bunch of other Yankees know
how I love to argue lawyers EH? Cya'll in Court or Hell. C'est la meme
chose. N'est pas?
Barry, the fact that you deliberately intervened in order to help screw
my wife and kids will make you very famous someday or my name ain't
Dave. You are just another lawyer who loves to FAKE LEFT and all your
friends know it. You were right when you told my wife I was going to be
pissed off after you screwed her in court. Do you think your law firm
will let you go before or after I sue it? Do you or Bixby think that
your managing partner is any smarter that David Rosenblatt? Me neither.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
David Amos <motomani...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 17:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos <motomani...@yahoo.com>
Subject: Who thinks the dumb crooks in Saint John have one clue what I
am up to?
To: carl...@hotmail.com, lord...@rogers.com, lero...@nb.aibn.com,
tanker...@pcnb.org, pcmonct...@nb.aibn.com,
ashfie...@nb.aibn.com, fi...@nb.aibn.com, kirk.ma...@warpnet.ca,
mike.ta...@nb.aibn.com, leod...@nb.aibn.com, cf...@unbsj.ca,
ch...@unb.ca, chs...@unb.ca, nmi...@corridor.ns.ca
CC: paul...@nb.aibn.com, secr...@monctoncrescent.com,
in...@gregdavis06.ca, cle...@nbnet.nb.ca, lpmc...@nb.sympatico.ca,
Thomp...@parl.gc.ca, Stephen...@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca,
Atlanti...@gmail.com, sjhli...@nb.aibn.com,
mikep...@coalfish.ca, rche...@mosherchedore.ca
David Amos wrote:
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 06:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomani...@yahoo.com
Subject: Attn Chief Barry McKnight of Fred City
To: brad.w...@fredericton.ca, pol...@fredericton.ca,
oldm...@yahoo.com, jeff.m...@gnb.ca, jacques...@cbc.ca,
Deb_...@cbc.ca, spin...@hotmail.com, Duane.R...@unb.ca,
ndp...@nbnet.nb.ca, bta...@nbnet.nb.ca, mack...@canada.com,
Polit...@hotmail.com,
norm.mc...@saintjohn.ca, Ivan....@saintjohn.ca,
oldmais...@gmail.com, pat.b...@saintjohn.ca,
advocacyc...@yahoo.com
CC: dch...@atlanticbusinessmagazine.com, cj...@nbnet.nb.ca,
kings...@nb.aibn.com, ne...@kingscorecord.com, ne...@dailygleaner.com,
kcarm...@bloomberg.net, davie...@nbpub.com,
dannyro...@nb.aibn.com, vote...@hotmail.com,
urquha...@telegraphjournal.com, bmo...@mosherchedore.ca,
Willia...@gnb.ca
Hey Barry
If you or you underlings bother to scroll down you will see that I have
a huge bone to pick with you in the Court of the Queen's Bench further
harrassment of me will not assist the lawyers that must defend your
city from my justifiable lawsuit. After you became the latest Chief in
Fred city I asked you last year to make your underlings uphold the
Police Act as well as the other laws and the Charter. Didn't I? Don't
you think they should have quit harrassing me and just did their job as
they said they would under oath?
Everybody knows who I am by now. A hairy dude who sometimes wears a
Black Watch kilt driving a white Towncar or a black Panhead with Yankee
plates is kinda hard to forget in the snotty town Fredericton. Stop it
right now will ya? Do you have any doubts that I will sue the City
because of the malice and incompetance of its cops, its Mayor and its
City Solicitor? Why bury yourself if you manage to come up with some
criminal charge to try to stick me with. trust that I with love
explaining my matters to a jury on your dime and time.Well I just met
two more of your cops (Durling and Arbour if that is how they spell it.
They would not for me) last night that do not understand the term
privacy. The yo yo named Durling decided to sneak up on me and read
what I was typing in my laptop as I sat off the street in a parked car.
He demanded to know who I was but refused to take the same material
that I had given to the cop name Carl who is running for York. I gave
Durling a shocking surprise in that some men know how to defend their
rights and ain't scared of corrupt cops not even a little bit. Tell me
Chief Barry McKnight when do you think that you and Grant Garneau will
ever get around to acting within the scope of you employment? Before I
make you famous or right after I sue the City? Kinda late on both
counts ain't it Chucky Leblanc?
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
David Amos wrote:
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomani...@yahoo.com
Subject: Hey Brucster see if Leroy can explain this email to you I know
Idee and Dr. ED won't
To: kings...@nb.aibn.com, lero...@nb.aibn.comCC:
lord...@rogers.com, tanker...@pcnb.org,
pcmonct...@nb.aibn.com, ashfie...@nb.aibn.com,
fi...@nb.aibn.com, kirk.ma...@warpnet.ca, carl...@hotmail.com,
mike.ta...@nb.aibn.com, leod...@nb.aibn.com,
vote...@hotmail.com, sjhli...@nb.aibn.com
David Amos wrote:
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomani...@yahoo.com
Subject: If Brad Green can't explain this email to Rick, McGraw should
be able to explain everything to all
To: paul...@nb.aibn.com, secr...@monctoncrescent.com,
in...@gregdavis06.ca, cle...@nbnet.nb.ca, lpmc...@nb.sympatico.ca,
Thomp...@parl.gc.ca, Stephen...@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca,
oldm...@yahoo.com, Atlanti...@gmail.com.
A lawyer by training, Louis-Philippe was an MLA from 1999 to 2003. He
is currently Director of Regional Affairs for the federal Minister Greg
Thompson. Originally from Sainte-Rose, he has a bachelor in business
administration (B.A.A.), a law degree (LL.B.) and a master in business
administration (M.B.A.). Louis-Philippe is also actively training in
endurance sports and taking care of his blueberry fields.
Say hey to that nasty bastard Greg Thompson for me will ya
McGraw?.Better yet I just did. N'est Pas? So should I say hello to
Charles LeBlanc for you?
I hope some liberal wannabe MLA displace just enough conservatives like
they did you last time around to make just a very slim majority like
Bernie Lord had last time around. I would dearly love to see a few NDP
get in and rule the roost like Tanker Malley did this spring. Now that
would be a truly entertaining circus to watch..
Guess who is in town Chucky. Let just say any fool can sing the Blues
lets see if you can live them.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
David Amos wrote:
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:30:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomani...@yahoo.com
Subject: See if Brad Green can explain this email to you Rick
To: sta...@electrickmiles.ca, brad....@gnb.ca
CC: lewi...@nbnet.nb.ca, greg...@nb.aibn.com,
br...@pattersonpalmer.ca, nbyla_...@hotmail.com
David Amos wrote:
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:56:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomani...@yahoo.com
Subject: Fwd: This email is the proof I forwarded the text of your
webpage the all the MPs
To: carswell.cust...@thomson.com,
jayne....@thomson.com
David Amos wrote:
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:06:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos motomani...@yahoo.com
Subject: This email is the proof I forwarded the text of your webpage
the all the MPs
To: Byron Prior , morr...@nf.aibn.com
CC: edi...@notacolony.ca, ste...@downes.ca, in...@ottawapolice.ca,
rada...@yahoo.com, preve...@psepc.gc.ca, swa...@storm.ca,
Da...@parl.gc.ca, Moo...@parl.gc.ca, OCon...@parl.gc.ca,
Matth...@parl.gc.ca, sm...@pattersonpalmer.ca,
jcro...@pattersonpalmer.ca, Deb_...@cbc.ca, jacques...@cbc.ca,
ombu...@cbc.ca, bsh...@nl.rogers.com, rgfa...@pattersonpalmer.ca,
ne...@dailygleaner.com, kcarm...@bloomberg.net,
davie...@nbpub.com, tony....@fredericton.ca,
david...@fredericton.ca, brad.w...@fredericton.ca,
jeff.m...@gnb.ca, mric...@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca,
pol...@fredericton.ca, cynthia...@dfait-maeci.gc.ca,
sco...@parl.gc.ca, oldm...@yahoo.com, advocacyc...@yahoo.com,
East...@parl.gc.ca, Comar...@parl.gc.ca, city...@fredericton.ca,
Wie...@mintz.com, bmo...@mosherchedore.ca, rche...@mosherchedore.ca,
Robert....@state.ma.us, Brian....@state.ma.us,
spin...@hotmail.com, Duane.R...@unb.ca, ndp...@nbnet.nb.ca,
bta...@nbnet.nb.ca, mack...@canada.com, Polit...@hotmail.com,
oldmais...@gmail.com, pat.b...@saintjohn.ca
Byron
I just called the Morris law office but after we talked a few minutes
it appears he hung up suddenly. However the same thing happened
yesterday when I was talking to a politcal priest in New Brunswick who
is running for the NDP up on the Mirimichi. I suspect the Feds are
playing games with me as usual. That said I did manage to tell Mr
Morris I will send him a few emails to aid in his defence of his
clieit. If he wishes he can call my number (506 434 1379) and deal with
my voicemail, then let me know when is a good time to call him back. At
the very least he can never say he does not know of my support of you
way back in 2004 before I ran for a seat in Parliament the first time
anound. Since then I ran in the 2006 federal election, the election in
June in Nova Scotia and I am now running in the present election in New
Brunswick. I plan to file the first of many lawsuits against the Crown
this week.
To aid in your friend's defence I will forward to his lawyer and
obviously many others my answers to his spoof emails. At the very least
I am a witness against the Newfy Justice system's actions against him.
He needs to be very careful because I suspect they are employing
criminal chages that could involve imprisonment. You must remember what
the Yankees did to me in order to coverup their wrongs against my Clan.
Don't think the same cannot happen to the young fella supporting you.
I recognized his game as soon as I read what he sent to me and many
others. In fact he explained what he was up to within the spoof emails.
This young fella has big balls. I liked his open and honest stlye of
taking on the smiling bastards.I supported him immediately by answering
the emails and adding some stuff gleaned from the web about you. I also
sent him an email with some of my stuff attached to help him out as
soon as I read the following CBC news report and his name was
mentioned. however methinks that the cops quite likely had his computer
by then and kept that email to themselves because I was complaining of
them at the same time for their cover up of my concerns and
allegations.
This is the best I can do for now from afar. After this particular
election is over I just may catch a boat to the Rock and idle around St
John's Newfoundland a while on my old Harley in order to jerk some
chains myself. I really should sue some lawyers would failed to uphold
the Law Society Act. That Rhodes Scholar named Danny Williams is at the
top of my list of lawyers I hope to sue someday after i take on the
Crown. His Attorney General Tommy Boy Marshall and all the corrupt cops
who support them do not scare me one little bit. If they get for some
trumped up charge they will have a hell of an argument coming from a
Pro se defendent just like Michael bray laments of over here after the
CBA meeting over on the Rock. If I some how quit breathing my ghost
will get even with all the smiling bastards for me. Trust that simple
fact. You know I keep good records and they are far more complete and
accurate than any crooked clerk's of any court..
Veritas Vincit.
Dave
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/newfoundland-labrador/story/2006/08/10/spoof-emails.html
Man claims he spoofed premier's e-mail address
Last Updated: Thursday, August 10, 2006 9:50 AM NT
CBC News
The Royal Newfoundland Constabulary has charged a 38-year-old St.
John's man for mimicking the e-mail address of Newfoundland and
Labrador Premier Danny Williams.
The province shut down its e-mail system for several hours last week
when it discovered that someone had been sending e-mails from what
appeared to be the premier's account.
However, a short time after pulling the plug on the government's e-mail
system, the messages were discovered to be a ruse. Officials said the
person who sent the messages was unable to read the premier's e-mails
or access sensitive information.
Police said Wednesday that a man was formally charged last week with
one count of mischief in relation to the incident.
While police have not named the individual, Paul Perrier said this week
that he is the man responsible.
"Last week I was the man, basically, who made the front page of the
Evening [sic] Telegram," said Perrier.
Man plans to plead not guilty
Perrier claimed he sent an e-mail containing nasty and wild accusations
about Premier Danny Williams last week and he said he made it look like
it came from the premier's account. He added it was a ploy to draw
attention to children's issues.
"I want to rattle this guy's chain, that's why I sent out this spoof
e-mail," said Perrier.
"I never cracked into no system or anything like that. It was just a
little basic program I used to make it look like it came from the
premier's e-mail."
The provincial government said about 80 employees and an unknown number
of outside accounts actually received the message.
Perrier, however, claimed the actual number is a lot higher. He said he
went to random websites and picked thousands of addresses.
"Well, I had a list of about 44- or 45,000 e-mails, I suppose," said
Perrier.
"I got about 50- to 55,000 out of it, I suppose."
While Perrier claimed he sent the e-mails, he said he is going to plead
not guilty to mischief at his court appearance in September.
The police said an investigation is still underway by the RNC's
economic crime unit and the RCMP's integrated technical crime unit.
A spokesperson for the RNC said police are not ruling out further
charges.
Byron Prior wrote:
David, again THANKS, this is wonderful and should be just what his
lawyer needs, by the way is name is Kent Morris fax# 754-5715 or toll
free tele # 1-866-754-4124 e-mail morr...@nf.aibn.com I know you
won't bother to contact him. David be nice to him and ask why can't he
represent me also? I can give him all my info, I know, you have all of
it.
Thanks again
Byron
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Byron
Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2006 2:01 AM
Subject: within this email is the proof I forwarded the text of you
webpage the all the MPs
moto maniac <motomani...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 00:53:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: moto maniac <motomani...@yahoo.com>
Subject: Fwd: Jeff it is David Amos
To: all...@nl.rogers.com
Note: forwarded message attached.
Do you Yahoo!?Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 08:00:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: moto maniac motomani...@yahoo.com
Subject: Jeff it is David AmosTo: jeff.m...@gnb.ca
CC: diane....@flsc.ca, brad.w...@fredericton.ca,
pol...@fredericton.ca
sans ms" Hey
I just called and introduced myself. I knew all along that the
prosecutor was McAvity himself and the legal aid lady was Gallagher. I
just wished for him to be honest about it all. Thank you for being
honest enough to admit that you at least still had the copy of wiretap
tape numbered 139. I also called Sgt. Copp of the Fredericton PD in
answer to his letter yesterday as soon as could after getting out of
jail. He never returned my call and I am not surprised. Corporal Ross
had everything he said needed since June 24th.
There is now a rather large personal injury lawsuit heading up-home in
the near future. I seen no need to explain it to you at this time as I
am certain that your already know the reason it is necessary. As i said
I will look forward to arguing you in court.
The timing of your letter to me was really quite offensive to me. It
appears that you sent it to me once you knew I was heading to jail and
that they were trying to put me away as a nut. As soon as I appeared in
Dorchester District Court on on Oct 1st it was obvious that they had a
malevolent plan against me particularly in light of the fact that I had
filed original wiretap tapes over a month before in two courts one in
each country. The same holds true for Sgt. Copp. Not one word has ever
been mentioned about them except by the DA Tim Cruz and the US Attorney
Don Feith over a year and a half ago when they falsely claimed that
they were evidence in my wife's Probate Matters after the DHS tried to
take me away. May i suggest that you sit back and listen to the CD if
you already haven't and prepare your defense of your own interests. I
my opinion you have failed the Public Trust. The fact that you agree
with Brad Green merely serves to prove my point. Even the Governor
General admitted that he was the right dude to give my stuff to. Wayne
Steeves, as you certainly failed to act within the scope of his
employment.
In return for you mocking candor I will forward you some emails that
are being read around the world. They come through in Yahoo as
attachments but I assure you that they are free from viruses. If they
weren't, I would have heard about it yesterday from Anne McLellan or
Eva Plunkett or Margaret Bloodworth.
You might as well have a look at them because you letter to me was sent
immediately to Parliament. Say hey to Bruce Noble for me will ya? Tell
Shirley McLean she is now way past too late to act with integrity.
ms"> You might as well share what you know to be true with Diane
Bourque. I called her office a long long time ago and spoke with her
directly as I did you. She took notes. Perhaps she should review them.
There is now no need to send her hard copy. Your are Associated with
her as is Shirley McLean and Bruce Noble to name a few. I will call Ms.
Bourque again (514) 875-6351 after sending this email in order to
assure her of my sincerity. Byway of this email she now knows the truth
for herself. If she wishes she can call my attorney Joyce Richardson at
506 432- 4888 and ask her any thing she wishes before I begin the
litigation process. I will prosecute my matters with you Pro Se. Joyce
is an important witness because she accompanied me to the meeting with
the Police Commission and also attempted to be the Conservative MP for
Fundy in stead of the malevolent Rob Moore.. Ask Mr. Keirstead under
the Minister of Public Safety if you don't believe me.
At the very least I have proof that this email was sent to you and all
the others mentioned in this email. Even if you deny receiving it or
anyone fails to respond, it is still evidence with far more traceable
information than the Canada Post you sent me. I have found this
necessary to do because because it appears that CISIS now intercepts
both my Canadian Mail and my US Mail so I am forced to resort to emails
or delivering in hand with a witness. Mr. Mockley, your knowledge of
wiretap matters will prove quite valuable to me in the near future.
Mayor Woodside it is time for you to sit up and pay attention. I you
don't think a man can't sue City Hall you really should check my work.
I did not pick this fight with Fredericton. Your Police Dept. threw me
out of the legislature and assisted the Sergeant at Arms in banning me
from the premises. I can easily prove prior contact with your City
Solicitor, one of you Councilors and the Fredericton Police Dept. byway
of emails phone calls and personal visits over the course of last
summer. If you have any questions contact Bolduc Clement and maybe he
will allow you to listen to the tape of our meeting in the office of
the New Brunswick Police Commission on August 24th immediately
afterwords I saw you City Solicitor Bruce Noble waddle by and we did
make eye contact. I remember him and I have no doubt that he remembers
me. Trust the fact that once you meet me, I am rather difficult to
forget. Many lawyers and politicians will swear that to be a true
statement.
Trust me, now that I have emerged from the downtown jail in Beantown. I
am very very pissed off. I will seek relief from all who conspired to
put me there based on false allegations made by a very crooked little
lawyer. I have got Ms. Troccoli fired from two law firms in their
malicious efforts to disassociate with her before the shit hits the
fan. It is now October and the Corrupt Court will not admit that my
wife's Uncle Franky has be dead since the time I ran for Parliament in
June. Both he and his siblings are are buried right beside Rose
Kennedy. Need I say more? Yea why not? the last surviving brother in
Boston that stole all of my wife's inheritances is an ex FBI Agent who
know knows far to much about public corruption to allow a simple
Maritime man find justice for his Clan. Putting me in jail as some sort
of nut was a very desperate act of a very corrupt justice system in
order to cover up their own wrongs and protect the reputation of many a
low man in high places.
My last question to all of you is do you not understand the meaning of
your oaths? I will ask it again later in court.
ms"> Cya'll in Court :)
sans ms"> David Raymond AmosNote: forwarded message attached.
Do you Yahoo!?vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!
From: "David Amos" motomani...@hotmail.com
To: in...@gg.ca
CC:,,,Stron...@parl.gc.ca,
,,,c...@nbnet.nb.ca,
,,,Bris...@parl.gc.ca,
,,,eth...@harvard.edu,
,,,Comar...@parl.gc.ca,
,"motomaniac",,Effo...@parl.gc.ca,
,,,Dosa...@parl.gc.ca,
kcarm...@bloomberg.net
Subject: Your words and now mine
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 22:35:00 -0400
Hmmmm
As I watch you fellas play your wicked game, it seems that you forgot
the the wild card that is in the game as well. The joker or the self
proclaimed court jester that is me. Or didn't anyone tell you this
morning that I got out of jail last night and escaped Ashcroft's
clutches once again for a little while at least? I bet you do know now
because Rob Moore must be screaming for help like a little stuck pig by
now.
You Bloomberg dudes ain't fooling me because I am too stupid. Plus
there fact that I sent Bloomberg the same letter I sent Mulroney a long
long time ago and little while before that I had talked personally to
his reporter in the White House. I am certain he knew of that
conversation. I will wager I am having more fun than you guys are right
now. I will leave you all to wonder who gets this email next. Tommorrow
we shall see if he has enough sand to make history or if he made a deal
with you devils.
Some honest folks are having a pretty good laugh right now at your
expense. I certainly hope the rest of Canada joins in on the chuckle.
APEX in Ottawa and Accenture/McGraw Hill in New York are about to make
their big plans for our future while I ran around chucking wrenches in
the works. Trust me this is fun.
Tomorrow is another day and I would not want to spoil the show. If the
Yankee bastards come get me tonight, methinks they will be to late to
stop the circus. Rest assured I will die smiling because I know what I
did today and they don't. No matter what they choose to do to me I
cannot undo what I have already done. What a difference a day makes eh?
Oct. 6 (Bloomberg) -- "Canada's biggest opposition party said it would
support Prime Minister Paul Martin's legislative agenda as long as he
adds five pledges, including a commitment to lower taxes on poor
families and to hold a parliamentary vote on whether Canada joins the
U.S. missile defense program.
Conservative Leader Stephen Harper, 45, made his demands in an
amendment to yesterday's Throne Speech, which laid out the government's
program. The speech is considered a ``confidence'' matter, meaning the
government will fall should the majority of members of Parliament vote
against it. Tony Valeri, the Liberal minister in charge of organizing
the legislative schedule, said he needed more time to decide whether
the government could agree to the changes. Any votes on amendments to
the Throne Speech will be votes of confidence, Valeri said. One may
take place tomorrow, he said.
`Big Problem'
``Anything that changes the intent of the government is obviously
something that we have a big problem with,'' Valeri told reporters in
Ottawa. ``There's a lot to look at, a lot to consider.''
Jack Layton, leader of the New Democrats, indicated that he would back
the Liberals.
``We will not play chicken with an opportunity to make positive
change,'' Layton said in the House of Commons. "
To contact the reporter on this story: Kevin Carmichael in
Ottawa
Hey Chantal
OTTAWA-With yesterday's Speech from the Throne, Prime Minister Paul
Martin is daring the federalist opposition leaders - in particular
Conservative Leader Stephen Harper - to align themselves with the
sovereignist Bloc Québécois to defeat his minority government.
He may yet see that happen.
At best, the speech amounts to a high-risk attempt to tilt the balance
in the House of Commons in favour of the Liberals by polarizing it
along federalist/sovereignist lines.
At worst, it is the clumsy product of a governing party that is willing
to break at the first opportunity rather than bend to the realities of
minority rule.
What it is not is the work of a government that has broken a sweat
searching for ways to make do in uncertain circumstances.
For the most striking feature of Martin's second Speech from the Throne
is that it is so much like the first one.
Poring over its 15 pages, one is at a loss to find signs that its
authors drafted it with a serious thought to its changed circumstances
and the election-imposed necessity to reach out to the opposition to
survive.
Yo, Adrienne
Yesterday while my wife and friends from Canada were busy with their
last dimes bailing me out of a Boston jail that the fat dumb and happy
old lawyer Ronald A. Irwin didn't care that I was in, you were busy
making your big speech and bragging of preparing for another fancy
world tour at Canadian expense. When I read your speech today, I saw
red. I expected the political double talk kissing Martin's ass simply
because he has covered your butt with respect to all the money you
squandered. However stealing a little glory from the veterans of past
wars was to much for me to stand. You really pissed me off and I must
register my indignation now.
In your speech you paid homage to dead men from World War II that I was
named after and talked of visiting Saint John NB amongst other places.
Perhaps you should have stopped at the Veteran's hospital in Saint John
and talked to one of the last surviving 48th Highlanders that went up
through Africa and Italy. His name is ol Tom. He has been through hell
and back many times and still retains a remarkable Joie de Vivre. He is
one of my best friends in life and it was his kilt that I wore while
campaigning for Parliament. I was also wearing it as I went off to jail
as well back out again.
I am sure Tom would have loved meeting you and telling you a few horror
stories about the war and about the great times that we have shared
together as friends. He is thirty years my senior but he has long
recognized the attibutes within me that would befit a proper lady from
hell. Ask Mr. Irwin's help about a proud man they met yesterday within
the living hell of a Beantown jail. Ol Tom, my father and many other
good men taught me to never surrender, never take prisoners, maintain
your pride and ethics and never stop enjoying whatever life may throw
at you. Ol Tom, my father and all the others saw too many friends that
never had a chance to enjoy the sort of life that I have lived. I thank
Ol Tom for his friendship and support he is my only friend of the old
school of decnt men that I have known who is still alive. It is now my
turn to make their lessons and memory live on. Rest assured Tom will
receive a copy of this letter.
(: I hope to see you once again real soon Corporal Hee Haw. You know I
just gotta jerk your chain to hear the old dog growl. Me old Yamaha is
waiting for you to ride. I will ride along with Superfarmer's old Kawi.
To hell with the Harleys they are too expensive and slow for the pace.
Our old bikes have been stress tested for over the 25 years why quit
riding them now? Beside we are all as poor as church mice these days we
might as well enjoy the day with what we already have. Say hey to Dave
for me as he reads you this letter and give him a kiss for me until
payday :) This note is no joke I have more respect for Ol Tom than a
million politicians. If there is anyone that I wish to be remembered
byway of this email, it is him. I simply don't give a damn if anyone
else reads it but I know many will very very soon. You can take that to
the World Trade Bank.
It was no accident that I put my name on the ballot in Fundy on June
7th. That was the day my mother's favorite brother died in Normandy.
She honoured me with his name, Raymond. My father, who was the sole
survivor of a plane crash during the war honoured me with the name of
his friend. David who went on to be awarded the Victoria Cross for his
bravery. Obviously I put my full name on the ballot not only to honour
both my mother and my father but to most importantly of all to honour
the men like ol Tom still living who sacrificed so much in order for me
to be allowed to speak up and defend the rights that so many people
like him have fought to defend.
After all the prior contact with you and your office, you chose to
defend the likes of Paul Martin and his many cohorts and head out to
party some more? Shame on you. The following are your words and the
following emails are my words and proof that I am making my best effort
to properly shame you in an ethical fashion. If for no other reason
someone must bear witness for the living and the dead so that their
sacrifices were not in vain.
It is now the end of the first day of Parliament and it appears that my
former political opponent Rob Moore, who is appropriately named as well
is apparently struck dumb by my contacts with him and I have not heard
from anyone that was willing to act honourably and call for a
confidence vote. Methinks I will chastise the NDP first because they
are the biggest disappointment to me. As you can see I have already
begun. I had high hopes for them because their party contained the
least amount of lawyers.
Adrienne, why you would choose to continue to honour the likes of T.
Alex Hickman is way beyond Byron Prior's understanding and mine as
well. Rest assured that we are cut from the same cloth as our
forefathers who fought to defend our Queen. We will speak for the
rights they gave us. The same ones that you and all those in public
service deliberately deny us. What say you now oh ye fine and fancy
lady?
Adrienne's (Martin's) words
"I congratulate both the returning members of Parliament, as well as
the more than one hundred who are newly elected, as you take up your
duties in the House of Commons for this Thirty-Eighth Parliament of
Canada.
This year, Canadians commemorated the 60th anniversary of D-Day and the
landing of allied forces in Europe-an event that spelled the
beginning of the end of the Second World War. Canadian soldiers,
sailors and aircrews fought with dogged bravery and were ultimately
victorious on Juno Beach that day.
Shortly, I will be going to Italy to commemorate the significant
campaign in which six thousand Canadians sacrificed their lives. To me,
personally, these commemorations are a symbol of our eternal gratitude
and an affirmation that we have not forgotten.
On these occasions, we are reminded of the huge debt we owe to those in
uniform who have served this country-then and today. Our veterans
connect generations and Canadians. As a country and as individuals, we
gain in pride and in purpose from their deeds and their service.
I recently concluded extended visits to six cities of varying
size-Saint John, Quebec City, Toronto, Saskatoon, Calgary and
Vancouver. In them, I found remarkable, innovative projects for social
renewal and individual commitment. They express the confidence and love
that we all hold for this country. This is the spirit of Canada I see
as Governor General."
And now mine
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Moo...@parl.gc.ca
Cc: all...@nl.rogers.com ; moto maniac ; c...@nbnet.nb.ca
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 7:58 AM
Subject: Remember me Rob?
Methinks it is time to sue you too.What say you?
By the way do you know the name of the RCMP officer that I was talking
to on June 19th about you and Mr. Harper as he guarded you folks while
you and Elsie had some Ice Cream and Harper smoozed the crowd? I have
enclosed a photo to refresh your memory.
On that day in front of many witnesses, I told you I would sue you if
you did not uphold the Public Trust. You told me you were too busy
playing politics but for me to keep up the good work.How am I doing?
It has been almost five months since you and I first talked. You have
done nothing to uphold the law as a lawyer and an officer of the court.
Lawyer prepare to defend thyself in civil lawsuits. Say hey to Arthur
Hamiton for me will ya?
MS"> Cya'll in Court:)
MS"> David R. Amos
P.S. Byron Prior and I both think today is a Good Day to inspire a
confidence vote in Parliament since the Governor General didn't bother
to to do the right thing yesterday. She can never say she didn't know
the truth. I have answers from her and two of her Lt. Govs.
Lets see if a few emails from Byron and I can shake some trees and
cause the rotting liberal minority to fall.
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: bihal...@rogers.com
Cc: p...@pm.gc.ca ; p...@pm.gc.ca ; Abbo...@parl.gc.ca ;
Ablon...@parl.gc.ca ; Ada...@parl.gc.ca ; Alco...@parl.gc.ca ;
Alla...@parl.gc.ca ; Ande...@parl.gc.ca ; Ander...@parl.gc.ca ;
Ander...@parl.gc.ca ; Ass...@parl.gc.ca ; Assado...@parl.gc.ca
; Asse...@parl.gc.ca ; Augus...@parl.gc.ca ; Bach...@parl.gc.ca
; Bach...@parl.gc.ca ; Bagn...@parl.gc.ca ; Bail...@parl.gc.ca ;
Bak...@parl.gc.ca ; Bakop...@parl.gc.ca ; Barn...@parl.gc.ca ;
Beaum...@parl.gc.ca ; Bela...@parl.gc.ca ; Belan...@parl.gc.ca ;
Belleh...@parl.gc.ca ; Belle...@parl.gc.ca ;
Benn...@parl.gc.ca ; Beno...@parl.gc.ca ; Berge...@parl.gc.ca ;
Bertr...@parl.gc.ca ; Bevila...@parl.gc.ca ; Bigr...@parl.gc.ca ;
Bin...@parl.gc.ca ; Blai...@parl.gc.ca ; Blondin-...@parl.gc.ca
; Bon...@parl.gc.ca ; Bonw...@parl.gc.ca ; Borot...@parl.gc.ca ;
Boud...@parl.gc.ca ; Bourg...@parl.gc.ca ; Brads...@parl.gc.ca ;
Breitk...@parl.gc.ca ; Bri...@parl.gc.ca ; Bris...@parl.gc.ca ;
Bro...@parl.gc.ca ; Bryd...@parl.gc.ca ; Bul...@parl.gc.ca ;
Burt...@parl.gc.ca ; Byr...@parl.gc.ca ; Cacc...@parl.gc.ca ;
Cadm...@parl.gc.ca ; Cald...@parl.gc.ca ; Cann...@parl.gc.ca ;
Capl...@parl.gc.ca ; Card...@parl.gc.ca ; Carig...@parl.gc.ca ;
Carr...@parl.gc.ca ; Cas...@parl.gc.ca ; Cass...@parl.gc.ca ;
Caston...@parl.gc.ca ; Catte...@parl.gc.ca ; Cauc...@parl.gc.ca
; Chambe...@parl.gc.ca ; Charbo...@parl.gc.ca ;
Chatt...@parl.gc.ca ; cla...@parl.gc.ca ; Code...@parl.gc.ca ;
Collen...@parl.gc.ca ; Comar...@parl.gc.ca ; Comu...@parl.gc.ca
; Cop...@parl.gc.ca ; Cotl...@parl.gc.ca ; Cre...@parl.gc.ca ;
Cull...@parl.gc.ca ; Cumm...@parl.gc.ca ; Cuzn...@parl.gc.ca ;
Dalphond...@parl.gc.ca ; Davi...@parl.gc.ca ; Da...@parl.gc.ca ;
Desjar...@parl.gc.ca ; Desroc...@parl.gc.ca ;
DeVil...@parl.gc.ca ; Dhali...@parl.gc.ca ; Dio...@parl.gc.ca ;
Disce...@parl.gc.ca ; Doy...@parl.gc.ca ; Dromi...@parl.gc.ca ;
Drou...@parl.gc.ca ; Dub...@parl.gc.ca ; Duce...@parl.gc.ca ;
Duha...@parl.gc.ca ; Dunc...@parl.gc.ca ; Dupl...@parl.gc.ca ;
East...@parl.gc.ca ; Eggle...@parl.gc.ca ; Ell...@parl.gc.ca ;
Ep...@parl.gc.ca ; Eyki...@parl.gc.ca ; Farr...@parl.gc.ca ;
Finl...@parl.gc.ca ; Fitzpa...@parl.gc.ca ; Fol...@parl.gc.ca ;
Font...@parl.gc.ca ; Fors...@parl.gc.ca ; Fourn...@parl.gc.ca ;
Fr...@parl.gc.ca ; Gagli...@parl.gc.ca ; Gagn...@parl.gc.ca ;
Gagn...@parl.gc.ca ; Gall...@parl.gc.ca ; Galla...@parl.gc.ca ;
Gauth...@parl.gc.ca ; Girard-...@parl.gc.ca ;
Godf...@parl.gc.ca ; God...@parl.gc.ca ; Goldr...@parl.gc.ca ;
Good...@parl.gc.ca ; Gou...@parl.gc.ca ; Grah...@parl.gc.ca ;
Gra...@parl.gc.ca ; Grew...@parl.gc.ca ; Gre...@parl.gc.ca ;
Gro...@parl.gc.ca ; Guarn...@parl.gc.ca ; Gua...@parl.gc.ca ;
Guim...@parl.gc.ca ; Hang...@parl.gc.ca ; Har...@parl.gc.ca ;
Harr...@parl.gc.ca ; Harv...@parl.gc.ca ; Harv...@parl.gc.ca ;
Hea...@parl.gc.ca ; Herr...@parl.gc.ca ; Hil...@parl.gc.ca ;
Hil...@parl.gc.ca ; Hilst...@parl.gc.ca ; Hint...@parl.gc.ca ;
Hubb...@parl.gc.ca ; Ian...@parl.gc.ca ; Jack...@parl.gc.ca ;
Jaff...@parl.gc.ca ; Jenni...@parl.gc.ca ; Johns...@parl.gc.ca ;
Jord...@parl.gc.ca ; Karetak-...@parl.gc.ca ;
Karygi...@parl.gc.ca ; Ked...@parl.gc.ca ; Kenn...@parl.gc.ca ;
Key...@parl.gc.ca ; Kilg...@parl.gc.ca ; Kilg...@parl.gc.ca ;
Knut...@parl.gc.ca ; KraftS...@parl.gc.ca ;
Lafram...@parl.gc.ca ; Lalib...@parl.gc.ca ;
Lalo...@parl.gc.ca ; Lanc...@parl.gc.ca ; Laste...@parl.gc.ca ;
Lavi...@parl.gc.ca ; Leb...@parl.gc.ca ; Lebl...@parl.gc.ca ;
Le...@parl.gc.ca ; Leu...@parl.gc.ca ; Lil...@parl.gc.ca ;
Linc...@parl.gc.ca ; Longf...@parl.gc.ca ; Loub...@parl.gc.ca ;
Lun...@parl.gc.ca ; Lunn...@parl.gc.ca ; MacAu...@parl.gc.ca ;
Mack...@parl.gc.ca ; Mack...@parl.gc.ca ; Mal...@parl.gc.ca ;
Malo...@parl.gc.ca ; Maho...@parl.gc.ca ; Manl...@parl.gc.ca ;
Mann...@parl.gc.ca ; Marc...@parl.gc.ca ; Marc...@parl.gc.ca ;
Mar...@parl.gc.ca ; Marl...@parl.gc.ca ; Mart...@parl.gc.ca ;
Mart...@parl.gc.ca ; Mart...@parl.gc.ca ; Matth...@parl.gc.ca ;
Mayfi...@parl.gc.ca ; McCal...@parl.gc.ca ; McCor...@parl.gc.ca
; McDon...@parl.gc.ca ; McGu...@parl.gc.ca ; McK...@parl.gc.ca ;
McLel...@parl.gc.ca ; McNa...@parl.gc.ca ; McTea...@parl.gc.ca ;
Mena...@parl.gc.ca ; Mered...@parl.gc.ca ; Merrif...@parl.gc.ca ;
Milli...@parl.gc.ca ; Mil...@parl.gc.ca ; Mil...@parl.gc.ca ;
Min...@parl.gc.ca ; Mitch...@parl.gc.ca ; Moo...@parl.gc.ca ;
Murp...@parl.gc.ca ; Mye...@parl.gc.ca ; Nau...@parl.gc.ca ;
Nevi...@parl.gc.ca ; Norm...@parl.gc.ca ; Nyst...@parl.gc.ca ;
Obhr...@parl.gc.ca ; OBri...@parl.gc.ca ; OBri...@parl.gc.ca ;
ORei...@parl.gc.ca ; Owe...@parl.gc.ca ; Pagta...@parl.gc.ca ;
Palli...@parl.gc.ca ; Pank...@parl.gc.ca ; Paque...@parl.gc.ca ;
Para...@parl.gc.ca ; Parr...@parl.gc.ca ; Pat...@parl.gc.ca ;
Pens...@parl.gc.ca ; Per...@parl.gc.ca ; Perro...@parl.gc.ca ;
Peschis...@parl.gc.ca ; Peter...@parl.gc.ca ;
Petti...@parl.gc.ca ; Phin...@parl.gc.ca ; Pica...@parl.gc.ca ;
Pick...@parl.gc.ca ; Pillit...@parl.gc.ca ; Plamo...@parl.gc.ca
; Pra...@parl.gc.ca ; Pri...@parl.gc.ca ; Proc...@parl.gc.ca ;
Prou...@parl.gc.ca ; Proven...@parl.gc.ca ; Rajo...@parl.gc.ca ;
Redm...@parl.gc.ca ; Ree...@parl.gc.ca ; Reg...@parl.gc.ca ;
Rei...@parl.gc.ca ; Reyno...@parl.gc.ca ; Richar...@parl.gc.ca ;
Rit...@parl.gc.ca ; Robil...@parl.gc.ca ; Robin...@parl.gc.ca ;
Roche...@parl.gc.ca ; Roc...@parl.gc.ca ; Ro...@parl.gc.ca ;
Saa...@parl.gc.ca ; Sauva...@parl.gc.ca ; Sav...@parl.gc.ca ;
Scher...@parl.gc.ca ; Schm...@parl.gc.ca ; Sco...@parl.gc.ca ;
Ser...@parl.gc.ca ; Sgr...@parl.gc.ca ; Sheph...@parl.gc.ca ;
Skel...@parl.gc.ca ; Solb...@parl.gc.ca ;
Soren...@parl.gc.ca ; Spel...@parl.gc.ca ; Spen...@parl.gc.ca ;
St-Ju...@parl.gc.ca ; St-Jac...@parl.gc.ca ;
St-Hil...@parl.gc.ca ; St.De...@parl.gc.ca ; Stec...@parl.gc.ca
; Stew...@parl.gc.ca ; Stin...@parl.gc.ca ; Stof...@parl.gc.ca ;
Stra...@parl.gc.ca ; Sza...@parl.gc.ca ; Tele...@parl.gc.ca ;
Thiba...@parl.gc.ca ; Thibe...@parl.gc.ca ; Thomp...@parl.gc.ca
; Thomp...@parl.gc.ca ; Tirab...@parl.gc.ca ; Tob...@parl.gc.ca ;
Toe...@parl.gc.ca ; Ton...@parl.gc.ca ; Tors...@parl.gc.ca ;
Tremb...@parl.gc.ca ; Tremb...@parl.gc.ca ; Ur....@parl.gc.ca ;
Vale...@parl.gc.ca ; Vancl...@parl.gc.ca ; Vella...@parl.gc.ca ;
Ven...@parl.gc.ca ; Vol...@parl.gc.ca ; Wapp...@parl.gc.ca ;
Wasylyci...@parl.gc.ca ; Wayne, Elsie - M.P. ; Whel...@parl.gc.ca
; Whi...@parl.gc.ca ; Whi...@parl.gc.ca ; Wilf...@parl.gc.ca ;
Willi...@parl.gc.ca ; Woo...@parl.gc.ca ; Yeli...@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 9:41 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Connie Fogal
Cc: ada...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; and...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
ang...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; atk...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; aus...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
bac...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; ban...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; bea...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
bir...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; bol...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; bry...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
buc...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; cal...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; car...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
car...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; cha...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; coc...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
chr...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; coh...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; com...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
co...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; coo...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; cor...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
cor...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; deb...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; da...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
din...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; doo...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; eyt...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
fai...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; fer...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; fin...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
fin...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; fur...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; fit...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
for...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; fra...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; gau...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
gi...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; gra...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; gra...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
gus...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; ha...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; her...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
hub...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; jaf...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; joh...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
joy...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kel...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; ken...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
ke...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kin...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kir...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
kol...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; kro...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; lap...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
lap...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; law...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; leb...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
leg...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; los...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; lyn...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
mah...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; mah...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; mah...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
mei...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; mil...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; moo...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
mor...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; mur...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; nol...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
oli...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; pea...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; pep...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
pha...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; pit...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; pou...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
po...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; pru...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; riv...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
rob...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; rob...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; roc...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
rom...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; ros...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; set...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
spa...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; spi...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; stg...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
sib...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; sto...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; str...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
tay...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; tka...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; tun...@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
wa...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; wie...@sen.parl.gc.ca ; wil...@sen.parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 9:21 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: roba...@telus.net
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:44 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Harp...@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:41 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Goldr...@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:39 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Mack...@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:36 AM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: aga...@nb.sympatico.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 10:58 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: leb...@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 8:03 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: sco...@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 8:01 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: cas...@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:59 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: hub...@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:58 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: bra...@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:56 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: sav...@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:55 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: in...@paulzed.com
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:34 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: me...@lutz.nb.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 4:05 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Bris...@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:56 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Bach...@parl.gc.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:53 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: jim.pr...@shaw.ca
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:41 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: ros...@math.toronto.edu
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 1:30 PM
Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: davido...@sasktel.net
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 1:15 PM
Subject: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
Just so ya know David I am forwarding these emails to other politicians
as well. But I didn't bother to call them because they are lawyers as
well. Therefore I see no need to explain my actions to them. Plus the
smart one's have a bad habit of trying to ignore me anyway. I t appears
that standard operating procedure for them is to ignore. delay, deny
and then try to settle. They are confused by someone that wants to
argue law rather than go away with the gold. What should be interesting
to both of us is whether or not they have a sudden fit of ethical
behavior after they discover that an honest western farmer and wild but
ethical maritime biker have been talking about them. Please notice that
I am more than willing to help such a man as Byron Prior anyway I can.
I just wish there were more men like him on this planet. Trust me the
US Attorney backtracking in the Martha Stewart matter and prosecuting a
Secret Service Agent is too funny to relate in this email.
Dave
Sans MS">
----- Original Message -----
From: <robm...@atrueconservative.ca>
To: <davi...@comcast.net>
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
> David,> > Thanks for the e-mails. I will read them all and hear what you have to say.> > All the best.> > Rob> > > > >> >
----- Original
Message -----> > From: David Amos> > To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.> > Sent:
Monday, March 22, 2004 5:08 PM> > Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail>
>>
>> > Elsie, I like you more and more. If anyone understands
about> > being forced to be away from his family its me. Give my
mom a> > call. Her laugh alone will make your day. To hell with
the> > smiling bastards in Ottawa their grins ain't genuine.
Maritimers> > can still find some fun in a long hard day :) Come
to think of> > it, maybe thats why the Upper Canadians think we
are crazy. By> > the way I have managed to get a rather famous
lawyer to speak on> > my wife's behalf down here while I run for
Parliament uphome. But> > before I go I have been invited to go
fishing with Martha> > Stewart's brother Frank in the Gulf of
Mexico.
My matters are> > about to bust wide open down here. That is why I have
chosen this> > time to make appearance uphome. Once I make the news
down here I> > will step on the stump uphome.> > Best> > Regards>
>
Dave> > ----- Original Message -----> > From: Wayne, Elsie -
M.P.> > To: David Amos> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004
3:42 PM> > Subject: RE: Regarding your e-mail> >>
>> > Dear Dave,> >> > I try to respond to as many
people as I can. We do get a lot of email> > around here.... I
decided to retire because I truly miss my family.> > It's hard
being on the road back and forth
by yourself. It gets very> > lonely.> >> > God Bless,> > Elsie> >
-----Original Message-----> > From: David Amos
[mailto:davi...@comcast.net]> > Sent: March 22, 2004 3:28 PM> > To:
Wayne, Elsie - M.P.> > Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail> >> >> > No
problem, Elsie. By the way my mom is a fan of yours. She told> > me you
were quitting. Too bad if it is true.You are the first> > politician to
respond to me. That fact alone wins my respect. Ask> > around Saint
John about me in certain circles I am fairly well> > known. You may
even know my sister, Nancy and her husband, Reid> >
Chedore. Perhaps you crossed paths with my dad C. Max Amos he was> > a
tax Supervisor for the Province years ago. And maybe even my> > mom's
second husband, Lloyd Nickerson, from Fredericton. He was> > somewhat
of a political person whereas my dad was not. (Lloyd was> > chief
electoral officer for about twelve years and did run as a> >
Conservative) If you wish to warm my mom's heart please give her> > a
call and simply say that you appreciate her good words about> > you to
her wild child Dalevid. She will get the joke. She is> > always
confusing me with another brother. Her name is Anna and> > her number
is 506 455 3600. Do with it what you will. Trust me I> > would love to
see another out spoken Maritimer step up to the> > plate and speak of
rights and wrongs. The sooner that I can go> > back to being just Papa
the happier my little Clan will be.
I> > would truly appreciate if someone would let my mom know that they>
> are at least aware of my concerns whether they agree with me or> > not.> > Best> > Regards>
>
Dave> > ----- Original Message -----> > From: Wayne, Elsie -
M.P.> > To: David Amos> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004
2:15 PM> > Subject: RE: Regarding your e-mail> >>
>> > Thank you for the notice.>
>> > -----Original Message-----> > From: David Amos [mailto:davi...@comcast.net]>
> Sent: March 16, 2004 2:07 PM> > To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.>
> Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail> >> >> >>
> ----- Original Message -----> > From: David Amos> > To:
eth...@harvard.edu> > Sent: Tuesday,
March 16, 2004 2:06 PM> > Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail> >> >> >>
> ----- Original Message -----> > From: David Amos> > To: tedca...@mail.gov.nf.ca>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:05 PM> > Subject: Fw:
Regarding your e-mail> >> >> >> > ----- Original
Message -----> > From: David Amos>
> To: all...@roadrunner.nf.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:03 PM> > Subject: Fw:
Regarding your e-mail> >> >> >> > ----- Original
Message -----> > From: David Amos> > To: Correspondance
Deputy Prime Minister/Vice premier ministre> > Sent: Tuesday,
March 16, 2004 1:57 PM> > Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail>
>> >> > I already received Anne's response.
Can't you people read what> > you wrote to me? Why else would I be so
pissed off?> > I am who I say I am and that is as follows:> > David R.
Amos> > 153 Alvin Ave,> > Milton, MA. 02186> > Phone 617 240-6698> >> >
Now just exactly who are you Mr. Correspondence Deputy Prime> >
Minister and are you a lawyer?> >> >
----- Original Message -----> > From: "Correspondance Deputy Prime
Minister/Vice premier> > ministre" <d...@pm.gc.ca> To:
<davi...@comcast.net>> > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:34 PM> >
Subject: Regarding your e-mail> >> >> > > If you wish to receive a
response to your comments addressed> > to the Deputy Prime Minister and
Minister of Public Safety and> > Emergency Preparedness, please include
your return mailing> > address along with your original e-mail message.
All official> > responses will be sent by regular mail.> > >> > > If
you wish to send
correspondence addressed to the Minister> > through the regular mail,
please use the following mailing> > address:> > >> > > The Honourable
A. Anne McLellan> > > Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public
Safety> > > and Emergency Preparedness> > > 340 Laurier Avenue West> >
> Ottawa, Ontario> > > K1A 0P8> > >> > >
From: David Amos <mailto:davi...@comcast.net>> > >
To: dwa...@web.net> > >
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 11:32 PM> > >
Subject: Read real slow then forget what is politically> > correct.> >
>> > >
Deal with your own conscience. After that try to think of> > a good> >
>
reason why I should not run for Parliament and at least speak> >
my mind about the sad state of our affairs. You know who I am.> >
If you don't, trust me,
you are way behind the eight ball.> > > Once I make my mark in the
American Justice System and> > political> > > process, I am coming home
to stress test the ethics of many a> > lawyer/politician in my
nativeland during the course of the> > next federal election. My
question to all of you will be why> > did you wait for me to say
something? Am I the only one paying> > any attention. Even Jesus got
mad a time or two and tore up a> > temple when he saw all the money
changing hands in a place> > that should not be concerned about such
things. But forget> > about the money for a minute. What did he have to
say about> > anyone that harmed a child? Rest assured I will remind
you.> > Although I ain't religious, I must say that Jesus
had more of> > sand than most men and he made some very good points
about> > what is right and what is wrong. Can any of you even hold a> >
candle to Byron? He has at least one friend that will back him> > up
all the way down the line. I don't mind dying it is what I> > didn't do
while I was living that will haunt me in in my> > grave. What is the
golden rule these days? Is it truly a fact> > that he with the gold
makes the rules. Do you think voters> > agree with that fact? What say
you?> >
>
Canadian Corruption> > >> > > Sexual Abuse &
Political & Legal Conspiracy.> > >> > > RCMP
Incompetence & Cover up.> > >> > > Priors Of Grand Bank NFLD Canada> >
>>
> > How do I get a corrupt legal system to investigate, charge
and> > convict itself? After years of asking the Canadian
Legal> > System to do its job, it's long past time to inform the
public> > myself about this lack of action or justice.> >
> If T. Alex Hickman, Justice Minister, 1966 to 1979 also Health>
> Minister 1968 to 1969 and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court>
> of Newfoundland 1979 to 2000, 34 YEARS OF COMPLETE LEGAL> >
SYSTEMS CONTROL,at 41 years of age, rapes and impregnates your> >
younger sister Susan, at 12
years old, and in grade 8, what> > would you do?At 12 years old she was
the youngest child> > ever,in Grand Bank,to have a baby. I am willing
to take any> > tests and answer all questions regarding my entire life.
All> > he has to do is take one blood test. It's time for him to stop>
>
manipulating our legal system and face the truth which I have> >
been telling the legal System,and anyone else who would> > listen,
all of my life.I didn't just awake one morning and> > decide to
accuse the most powerful and most corrupt legal> > animal in this
province. I have had, no childhood, no> > education, no family, no
hometown, no self- esteem or> > self-respect and no past, present
or future as a contributing> > person.> > >> >
> By the time I
was 14 years old I was responsible for 9 younger> > children, all of us
abused and molested while our hometown> > either joined in, bothered us
about our situation, or looked> > the other way and said we were all
trouble. Our mother has> > always been a hypochondriac and married
prostitute in a town> > of 2500 people. She can go blind instantly,
become a cripple> > instantly, go insane instantly and even convinced
the doctors> > at our Health Science Center 4 years ago she was dying
of> > cancer. They called her family and said she had a maximum of> >
two weeks to live, but out of every situation she can> > instantly
become well. This person is a disgrace to the human> > race and also so
are all those who support her. I am Byron> > Prior, the oldest of her
12 children.> > > (A) I was sexually
abused by my mother from age 4 to 14.> > >> > > (B) Physically beaten
by my mother until I bleed because I> > tried to stop her friends and
family from molesting my younger> > sisters.> > >> > > (C) Sent next
door with my mother's gay boyfriend almost daily> > for money from age
5 to 14.> > >> > > (D) Brought to her drunk girlfriend's summer cabin
to be> > sexually abused for money.> > >> > > (E) Had to clean the
blood from my 4 year old sister after
she> > was sexually molested by our grandfather and left on the> >
kitchen floor in a pool of blood.> > >> > > (F) Had to watch while my
oldest sister had three miscarriages> > and two children by the age of
15. One child for a member of> > the Newfoundland Government when she
was 12, and a second> > child when she was 15 for another Politician, a
girl, Majorie> > and a boy, Arron. In 1983 the girl, age 15, was given
an> > illegal abortion in Montreal with everything arranged and paid> >
for with spending money for her and my sister Joan, by a> > friend of
the family. This girl has worked for Hickman's> > family business from
high school to this day. Five of my> > sisters and one brother suffered
similar abuse as I did.>
>
> Why is this situation allowed to continue for more than 40>
> years and ruin all my families lives? Is it because,> > >
(A) Our mothers past customers are politically connected and> >
run our legal system.> > >> > > (B) Our mothers past
customers are Grand Bank business men> > whose children are now
politicians.> > >> > > (C) One of our mothers family
is a big wheel with organized> > crime all of his adult life and
is a partner to politicians.> > >> > > (D)
Is it because two of her past customers are Salvation Army> > officers,
who came by to help us but became customers as well.> > (E) Is it
because all of North America is corrupt and a family> > of 12 really
means nothing to anyone when business and> > politics are concerned in
an economy controlled by corruption.> > (F) Is it to cover up Child
rape and corruption by T. Alex> > Hickman and a business family with
influence and business> > contacts all across Canada. The legal system
now tells us> > justice for my family and I are three charges against
one> > mentally delayed man with a judge and jury at the T. Alex> >
Hickman building in the same town where we spent our entire> > lives
with abuse and persecution. Two R.C.M.P. officers and> > the Crown
prosecutors office will make no effort to have the> > location changed.
Again there will be NO
JUSTICE SERVED and as> > much covered up as possible. This I'm told
will begin in Sept.> > 2001, at Grand Bank, NFLD I spoke with the Crown
Prosecutor on> > Sept,18/01. He said his office has been trying to get
the> > complete investigation reports from the RCMP for more than two>
>
years now and to this date still hasn't received them. He said> >
this was in his experience, the first time he had ever seen> >
such an unexplained delay to get information. On Nov 29/01 I'm> >
told by Victim services, this has changed to Jan.11/02 for a> >
trial date to be set.> > >> > > To whom it may
concern: 04/13/98 There are many horrors that I> > can recall from
childhood. Byron's too frequent trips to the> > woodshed next
door; his having to sleep in the
same bed as our> > Mother; his little hands, palms down, being held on
the hot> > coal stove burner; the never ending beatings with belt> >
buckles; braided nylon ropes; old- fashioned ironing cords;> > hot tea
thrown in our faces or the face of my Father; knives> > and forks
thrown at us; hot grease thrown at us or our Father;> > continual
molestation - sexual - to myself and other siblings;> > continual
verbal and emotional abuse; at eight years old I was> > locked in the
cupboard under the stairs for hours with rats> > crawling around me
because my little brother had misplaced his> > baby bottle while I was
in charge of him; continual> > abandonment when Mother would take her
vacation and leave us> > at seven and eight years old to take care of
ourselves and the> > babies; being forced to quit school to go to work
to provide> > yet
more money for our beloved Mother; my younger brother,> > Allan, being
thrown into jail for no legitimate reason, other> > than she wanted him
out of the house - by the way; if you> > check, you will also find that
there is no record of his> > incarceration; the abuse that we suffered
was, and remains,> > never ending........ Our lives have been
destroyed. We all> > suffer from severe emotional problems. We have
extreme> > difficulty trusting others. We cannot form loving> >
relationships. It is very difficult for us to allow others to> > get
that close to us without pushing them away. All we ever> > wanted was
someone to love us for who we were; but, when we> > get close to
others, we tend to sabotage those relationships -> > unconsciously. The
cycle of abuse continued with my own> > daughter. My younger brother,
Randell, molested her from
the> > age of four years. This fact my daughter was afraid to confide>
>
to me until a year and a half ago. May God have mercy on his> >
soul because "I Don't"!!!! Both Byron and myself have tried to> >
have those in authority - RCMP, Social Services, Clergy and> >
Teachers help us, but, our cries for help fell on deaf ears.> > We
were, to them, a disposible family of liars and children> > with
overactive imaginations. Nothing can make the nightmares> > go
away. Even the sleeping pills don't work anymore. It has to> >
end! There has to be justice and a sense of closure for all of> >
us. Please, if we stop this cycle of insanity from happening> > to
other innocent children, then maybe our lives would have> > not
totally been in vain. You are our hope. Please help us to> > find
justice.> >
> Sincerely Yours,> > > Sharl (Donna)
Prior> > >> > > April 14, 1998> > > A letter
of Shame;> > > This letter concerns what happened to my family
and myself.> > The things that I remember are also the things I
try to> > forget. I'm not very good with words so I will only tell
you a> > few things of many which have happened within my
family.> > Leather belts, ironing cords, ropes were only some
things I> > was beaten with so many times I can't count. Verbal
and mental> > abuse, the same humilating things that were done to
my sisters> > and brothers. Girls having to pull down their pants
and pea
in> > their underwear for our mothers long time friend, for money. I> >
remember our mother going into a bedroom with him and coming> > out
some time later. We have a brother and sister (who I love)> > who look
and act like this guy. I expect, without much doubt,> > are his. I
remember the abuse to my father, a man I loved with> > all my heart.
Attacks on him with anything our mother could> > put her hands on,
knives, hot water, chasing him out of the> > house. This man was home
maybe a day every ten, and she would> > blame him for everything and
when Dad wasn't around, we were> > blamed for everything, which was
anything. This is a woman who> > every chance she had would call the
police on me to try to> > have me charged with something. This was when
she couldn't> > beat me anymore because I was a little older, but she
still> > had to
have control over me. This was a small town in> > Newfoundland with a
population of 3500 people. So she would> > have me taken away from my
home by the police and I would have> > nowhere else to go, this was
control over me and she knew it.> > I would have to kiss ass just to
have a roof over my head. (Of> > course this was after my father had
passed away. He was afraid> > of her but he would never have let her do
this to me.) This is> > a woman that had me put in jail during
Christmas and New> > Year's when I was very young. This was for trying
to teach my> > niece her homework, she said I had to ask her. Education
was> > not something she was concerned about for her kids. All she> >
wanted was when I had turned 15 was to get out of school and> > go to
work in the fish plant so I could pay my way every week.> > She would
loan me $20 and I would
have to repay her $40 plus> > rent. This woman has a lot of problems. I
do not hate her> > because she is my mother but I do not like her as a
person.> > > I finally got out and moved to Ontario, uneducated with
no> > direction, but out. I really haven't had any contact with her> >
since then and have not seen her since. I think because of all> > these
things and many more which as happened to me and things> > I saw that
had happened to other members of my family is the> > reason I have a
hard time to meet anyone, develop a> > relationship, or hold down a
job. I'm always lost, I don't> > know if I should see a doctor or if
it's just me, I'm lost.> > The way I am now is the way the rest also
is, it must be> > because of her, take a look, it has to be. I'm
writing this> > letter now so that this
woman and the others who knew what was> > happening but did nothing
face up and admit what happened. All> > of my family have the same
problems and the same memories> > which affect our lives. This is
something I have never spoken> > about with anyone, but now maybe it's
time. Hopefully, this> > will help me start to became a real person a
whole person.> > Please do what you know is the right thing to do.> > >
Sincerely yours,> > > Allan Prior> > >> > > To Whom It May Concern:> >
> July 24, 2001> > > My name is Byron Prior. I'm the oldest living of these
12> > children. I not only had to live through my abuse but, watch> >
as the rest of my sisters and brothers were abused and raped.> > Three
of my sisters raped, 1 by a grandfather at the age of 4,> > a second
raped by T. Alex Hickman, Justice Minister, at age> > 11. A third
sister raped by a young man in our home town. The> > legal system are
only concerned with keeping all this under> > cover and protect
themselves. Please people, if you have a> > heart, walk one day in my
shoes and tell me you would just> > forget because these bureaucrats
say so. I have copies of my> > full statement on all the details of
what happened, which I> > gave the R.C.M.P. on March 9, 1998, 52.5
hours at their> > office. I will send it to anyone who will send me an
E-mail> > address. I will never forget the abuse, shame, and
persecution> > to this day,
from the animals who did this to my family.> > > Sincerely,> > > Byron
Prior> > >> > > On April 3, 2000, the second in command of the R.C.M.P.
for> > all of Canada, said in an interview from Toronto, organized> >
crime totally controls Canadian businesses and affects every> >
Canadians daily life, from video arcades to laundry mats. This> > is
very sad, here in Canada we are lost and we all need help.> > Here in
Newfoundland our Dictator, T. Alex Hickman, has had> > his hands in our
Political and legal systems from 1957 to this> > very day. His family
and friends control everything, including> > whether my family and I
ever get justice for what was done
to> > us in the town of Grand Bank. We've tried for justice at least> >
9 times from Police, Social Services, Clergy and Family> > members.
This last attempt started on March 9/98. On July> > 24/98 an RCMP
officer told me they have enough information to> > charge our mother
and one boyfriend now.> > >> > >> > > On February 25/00 an RCMP officer
said he was recommending the> > justice department should lay 35
charges against several> > people. This officer was taken off the case,
transferred from> > Grand Bank to St. John's custom's department
position and his> > wife transferred to a new position in St. John's
with> > Provincial social services department. To this day August> >
20/01
only 3 charges are laid against one mentally delayed> > boyfriend and
no trial date set yet . The trial date has been> > set for April 29/02.
On April 5/02 I spoke with the Crown> > Attorney, Ted Cardwell, he said
the only two witnesses for the> > trial on our behalf will be my sister
Joan and me. The> > investigating officer John Warr of the RCMP is not
necessary,> > my therapist of two years is not necessary, my social
worker> > from victim services is not necessary and my sister Joan's> >
therapist is not necessary. It seems to me like the final> > verdict
has already been decided and again for the victims> > there is no
justice.> > >> > >> > > The Court did not proceed on April 29/02. It
was
found by the> > Judge and both attorneys that they did not have an
unbiased> > jury toward the defendant and another attempt to find a
jury> > in this same town will be made again on May 21/02. This is> >
also the home town of my family and I and I asked the Crown> >
Attorney, at the beginning of this trial, if it could be held> > in a
neutral town to be fair to my family and I. If you have> > read some of
the statements in this web site guest book you> > can understand why I
made this request. It seems all> > consideration is given for the
defendant but none for the> > victims. The R.C.M.P. freely admit that
they are in position> > of 3 statements I had given them about the
abuse in our family> > when I was a child but for some reason will not
make these> > statements available to me or my lawyer. I would like you
to> > read this
request made of the R.C.M.P. by a local law firm on> > >> > > May 16/01
via fax (279-1871):> > > Royal Canadian Mounted Police> > > Marystown
Detachment> > > Marystown, Nfld.> > > Attention: Constable Jackie
Remillard> > > Dear Constable Remillard:: Re: Our Client - Mr Byron
Prior> > Further to the above and to our various past communications,>
>
most particularly our letter of February 16/ 01, despite the> >
passage of several months we have yet to receive the> >
information requested at that time. As it is
ordinarily a> > straightforward matter to obtain, with that person's
consent,> > the statements of a complainant we are at a loss to explain
to> > our client why our request has not been answered to date. We> >
would, therefore, appreciate your early attention to this> > matter and
look forward to the immediate receipt of the> > requested material.
Trusting the above to be satisfactory.> > > Yours very truly> > >
BUDDEN, MORRIS> > > GEOFFREY E. BUDDEN> > >> > >> > > Questions for
John Warr, R.C.M.P. lead investigator who will> > no longer speak
with me personally.> > > 1. Why would you say most of the R.C.M.P.
Officers and Doctors> > in my case are retired and you couldn't find
them now. Don't> > any of them get a pension? What address is that sent
to?> > > 2. Why did you tell two witnesses who volunteered information>
>
- a lady from Garnish and a man from Fortune, that this case> >
would be very messy and they should think very hard before> >
volunteering information, you would contact them in a couple> > of
days for an appointment. They both changed their minds> > about
witnessing.> > > 3. Why didn't you question witnesses whose
names you were> > given at the beginning of this case four years
ago. People in> > Ontario and people 15 minutes
from your office. One witness> > #85 & 86 in my guest book on my
website and others who have> > telephoned me.> > > 4. Why did you go to
a Grand Bank business man, who had no> > information about this case,
more than 2 years ago and tell> > him there was a very messy case
coming up soon involving my> > family and I. Then immediately after you
were transferred and> > only 3 charges laid against one person. 5. Why
is the lead> > investigator not a necessary witness in this case? You>
>
investigated and recommended the charges be laid, you must> >
have some information regarding this case.> > > 6. Why in 2
years of your investigation, did you not once> > approach or ask
Harriett Prior one question at all?>
> > After all these
years of reporting to the R.C.M.P. can> > everyone see why I have
to inform the public myself. IT'S A> > DISGRACE.> > >>
> > On April 19/00 our Prime Minister is in the Middle East>
> fighting for Basic Human rights. Here in your own house Mr.>
> Prime Minister we need Basic Human Rights also. We are now> >
fighting in Afganistan for the rights of abused and persecuted> >
people, most of whom are women, please allow my family and I> >
some personal rights and dignity here in Canada. If anyone> >
requires more info I have statements to Police, names and> >
positions of all persons involved and letters from family> >
members on what has happened to our dysfunctional family.>
> Please contact us at <mailto:byronp...@aol.com>> > byronp...@aol.com or call (709) 834-9822 Byron Prior. After> > you view our site please tell your friends and e-mail> > <mailto:p...@pm.gc.ca> p...@pm.gc.ca, or,> > > <mailto:pa...@paulmartin.ca> pa...@paulmartin.ca
and tell him,> > Justice for The Prior family of Grand Bank NFLD.
is long past> > due, you need to give them Justice today. Visit
their website> > at> > > <http://maxpages.com/sexualabuse>> > http://maxpages.com/sexualabuse
I Look forward to living with> > Democracy, Freedom and Justice
for my family also, here in> > Canada.> > > For
additional informational pages go to the links at the top> > left
of our homepage. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,> > >> >
> To
Whom It May Concern:> > > What I am about to disclose is
extrememly painful for me but> > what I'm writing is completely
honest to the best of my> > knowledge and recollection. I would
like it to be known for> > the record that I have no desire to
hurt anyone. All I am> > trying to accomplish is to help my
brothers, sisters and> > myself get some closure in their lives;
for them and for their> > families. For me, personally, I was and
still am very strong.> > I endured nothing in comparision to some
of my other siblings.> > I Love my Mother because she is my Mother
and she did give me> > life; such as it was. However, there is no
LOVE that compares> > with the love I have for my brothers and
sisters. Therefore, I> > must tell the Gods honest truth. What I
strongly feel for my> > Mother
though is a sense of pity. She is and always has been a> > Manic
Depressant. She has taken so many drugs in her lifetime> > that I
sometimes wonder if even she realizes the extent of the> > damage she
has caused us all.> > > Besides, she never had a chance anyway. Her
Mother was a> > diagnoised Manic Depressant and her Father was nothing
short> > of a pervert. Uncle Max told me and Suzanne that Grandmother>
>
was a diagnoised Manic Depressant and her Mother before her. I> >
have to wonder what went on in their lives and their home. I> >
bet if Moms family were to be honest they would have many a> >
story to tell. For me this whole story is regarding abuse.> >
Mental, Physical and sexual abuse. Abuse upon ones own> >
children. If I waver back and forth from one subject to> > another
please bare
with me for I am trying to write this as> > it comes to me in all
honesty. Of my youth I recall most of> > all is FEAR. Fear of MOM. Fear
of life. Fear of Love. Fear of> > being unloved. Fear of not being
accepted by my peers. Fear of> > failure. Fear of becomming a whore, a
drunk, a drug addict and> > God forbid, the fear of becomming a
murderer.> > >> > > By the grace of God I became none of the above.
Unfortunately> > for some of my brothers and sisters they have had
some> > difficulty dealing with the past and sometimes turned to drugs>
>
as an escape. But they have all done pretty well to date> >
keeping themselves on track. We have no hardened criminals and> >
no murderers among us which you may find amazing as the story> >
unfolds. We
were all very strong individuals; we had to be in> > order to survive
the ordeal. It has not been an easy road for> > any of us but we made
it and maybe we can become a family for> > once in our lives. Maybe we
can look each other in the eye> > someday and understand why we did and
do the things we do. I> > Love each and everyone of my borthers and
sisters so much. We> > all had so much potential if given even half a
chance at life.> > Our Mother stole away our chances at life. She
played us all> > one against the other from the day we were born. She
still> > cont
posted by David R. Amos at 1:59 AM 2 comments
Monday, October 02, 2006
Martha Stewart and me
Martha Stewart and her lawyers never responded even to hard copy sent
to but her brother Frank certainly did and i only sent him one email
with some important stuff attached.Ell after Frank and I talked he even
invited me to come down fishing with him sometime..Obviously I also
contacted many of Martha's friends and coworkers etc and they all
ignored me as some sort of fool. Even when I sent them hard copy to
prove what I said was True they laughed at me for some reason but it
was nervous laughter all the same after that. The most damning stuff
went to her son in law the lawyer BEFORE her trial began.. Martha knew
what Comey knew about me. Now years later Comey was right in a way. The
Martha Stewart matter wass all about liars. However he was the biggest
liar involved.
I have no understanding why Martha Stewart allowed herself to go to
jail when she undoubtedly knew how easily her brother and I could have
saved her butt. The only explanation can be is that she truly is a
crook. Read on before you doubt me as well
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Frank...@aol.com
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 1980 3:59 AM
Subject: Re: "I am not sure if you are Martha's brother"
Hey Frank
I thought I was right about you. I do respect your doubts and your
defense of your sister.
Call me at 617 698 6549 house 617 240 6698 cell listen to me closley
then check my work I can easily verify everything I tell you if you can
surf the web at the same time. I will then give you the number of a
lawyer who knows me and who is representing my wife he is speaking on
Court TV very soon you should talk to him as well.
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: Frank...@aol.com
To: davi...@comcast.net
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 11:07 AM
Subject: "I am not sure if you are Martha's brother"
Yes I am, & your subject matter is very interesting, indeed! I will be
on Fox & Friends in the morning.(Friday 12th) in defense of Martha's
plight. Is there anything I should say concerning this subject, since I
am comming into this blind & ignorant regarding the TRUE facts of the
case, & the PERSONALITIES behind the scenes, as somewhat portrayed in
your brief. For instance, how did Cuti betray Martha in the fact that
he didn't respond to this-your brief? This is powerful stuff -- what do
the powers that be do with it -- these facts (if they are all true), in
midstream? Most of all, not trying to be offensive, who are you? I am
totally ignorant, starting from scratch.
Please reply Sincerely,
Frank
----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: in...@evascrivosalon.com
Sent: Friday, January 04, 1980 9:36 PM
Subject: Attn Eva RE Martha Stewart
Eva
I heard you and her brother, Frank. speak last night on TV. Although I
don't pretend to judge or support Martha, I do wish to speak in her
defense as well. I must applaud your sincere defense of a friend and
his for a sister. She is lucky to have at least one that will speak as
friend after so many fair weather ones have flown the coop. I demand no
less from a brother and I think he dealt with that O'Reilly character
very well and with dignity and intergrity without stooping down to play
his game. As for you I say good for you, not only are you a pretty
person you are a loyal soul as well. In my book the former merely
catches my eye then the memory fades, the latter wins my respect and I
never forget that. I think her brother has no choice but to stand by
his kin if he is any sort of man. You on the otherhand acted out of
free will against so many people willing to kick your friend when she
is down. Yey for Eva! And a pat on the back for Frank. (I did email
him)
That said I must tell some friend of Martha that I truly believe that I
can help relieve her of her plight. Either she is not aware of my
efforts or she has been convinced by her lawyers etc. that I am some
sort of nut. I don't mind being called crazy but the last thing I am is
a liar. If you wish you can give me a call (my cell is 617 240 6698
house 617 698 6549) and hear me speak and listen carefully to my answer
to any question you wish to ask. Better yet listen to the names and
details that come off the top of my head. Although I obviously know
your number and email address, I will never bother you again to prove
that I am no stalker or weirdo.
If you wish I will forward you an email that many people have already
received and have done nothing about. It should prove to you that I am
a very simple, sincere and serious man. I make no bones about what I am
up to. It is the crooks that are prosecuting Martha that I am after. I
am employing her celbrity status against them just as they have used it
against her. I do all of this to proect my own family's interests and
not out some pretense of being a fan of Martha or some other saintly
motive. I don't know her as you do but I do know for certian that the
FEDS are corrupt and have no right to torture her when they are the
ones that truly deny justice for all. Obstruction of justice is there
game not Martha's and they are the most profound of liars as they
expound about the law and claim that her pants are on fire. I don't
care that she is labeled as being nasty bitch, some folks call me an
evil bastard. Sometimes the only way to get things done is to be as
mean as a snake. In my opinion it is time for her and I send a little
vengance in the proper direction. The best defense is a smashing
offence. I think a proper bitch and an evil bastard although a very odd
couple(we are worlds apart) should get on like a house on fire.
For the sake of your friend the next time you see her simply show her
this email and ask if she has ever even heard of me. If not perhaps she
should ask a question or two about me to her own legal counsel. The
following is a link to where I store my files on the web.
http://briefcase.yahoo.com/motomaniac_02186 They are open for public
view. It is not a web site it is just storage. they are filed in such a
way and with such labels so that I can quickly surf through them. If
you wish just go to the file called "legal crap" then "latest stuff"
then "responses" to see if I am for real then surf from there. Truth is
stranger than fiction. I am certain that Martha would agree with at
least that statement. This is my last attempt to contact her before I
head south for a while.
Best Regards
David R. Amos
Marriage Hole SODDI
Rev. Richard Skull
John Fleming
in the scriptorium "Marriage Hole SODDI"
<glommi...@mudshow.com> wrote:
> $Is that the dude what made Famous Anus Chocolate Chip Cookies?
Maybe.
--
John Fleming
Edmonton, Canada
A Dreamer is One Who Can Only Find Her
Way by Moonlight.
-- Oscar Wilde
No comments:
Post a Comment