How to get the truth out and help Canada
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 4:05 AM
Subject: Fwd: hey
To: brigitte belton <gidget642@gmail.com>, <davids@opabinllp.com>, <kwilson@wilsonlawoffices.ca>, jcarpay <jcarpay@jccf.ca>, fin.minfinance-financemin.fin <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, rob.moore <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, blaine.higgs <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>
Cc: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, pierre.poilievre <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, Jason Lavigne <jason@yellowhead.vote>, jagmeet.singh <jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, <ps.ministerofpublicsafety-ministredelasecuritepublique.sp@ps-sp.gc.ca>, Pam Stavropoulos <pstavropoulos@iprimus.com.au>, Dominic.Cardy <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, Robert. Jones <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, JUSTMIN <JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>, Jean.Chretien <Jean.Chretien@dentons.com>
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 12:37 PM
Subject: Fwd: hey
To: <Vincent.gircys@gmail.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 13:30:55 -0400
Subject: Fwd: hey
To: prontoman1@protonmail.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 12:56:02 -0400
Subject: Fwd: hey
To: AngryScotian@proton.me
Notice the webcast and transcript is missing then checkout pages 1, 2, 3 and 13
https://www.banking.senate.
Full Committee Hearing
Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the
Mutual Fund Industry
Date: Thursday, November 20, 2003 Time: 02:00 PM
Topic
The Committee will meet in OPEN SESSION to conduct the second in a
series of hearings on the “Review of Current Investigations and
Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry.”
Witnesses
Witness Panel 1
Mr. Stephen M. Cutler
Director - Division of Enforcement
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cutler - November 20, 2003
Mr. Robert Glauber
Chairman and CEO
National Association of Securities Dealers
Glauber - November 20, 2003
Eliot Spitzer
Attorney General
State of New York
Spitzer - November 20, 2003
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 19:01:03 -0400
Subject: Fwd: hey
To: Dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 18:33:20 -0400
Subject: hey
To: monick@grenierlaw.ca
Commission of Inquiry into Money Laundering in British Columbia
Issued July 21, 2021
A. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
Inquiry into Money Laundering in British Columbia (“Inquiry” or “Commission”) under
s. 11(4) of the Public Inquiry Act, S.B.C. 2007, c. 9 [PIA] brought by David Drover.
not sought an extension of time in which to bring this application. In the interests of the
efficient and effective conduct of the Inquiry, I order an extension of time for Mr. Drover
to bring this application pursuant to Rule 5 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure.
B. SUBMISSIONS OF MR. DROVER
format akin to making submissions on matters that bear similarity to the present
application. While I consider it unnecessary, given the issue before me, to address the
entirety of Mr. Drover’s explanation of what he says is relevant procedural history, I
have attempted to do so in a concise way below.
status is that he possesses evidence related to money laundering in British Columbia,
namely involving “RCMP and wealthy [businesspeople] and politicians in Canada and
the US and internationally.” Namely, Mr. Drover suggests that he has information that a
mining company based out of Alberta, of which he was a former shareholder, was for a
number of years involved in an international money laundering scheme.
[5] Mr. Drover submits that, given his knowledge of this international money
laundering scheme, he was contacted by law enforcement to assist police. He says that
his knowledge of this scheme, and his work with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police
(RCMP), are both matters that should be in evidence before the Commission.
that have relevance to his application for standing.
series of frivolous actions, including by way of lawsuits and professional complaints, to
discredit and pin criminal acts on him, including allegations of “criminal extortion,
criminal harassment, stalking, impersonating an RCMP Officer, and fraud.”
his filing of complaints against members of the RCMP, made as a result of events that
took place during his time assisting police. That lawyer, Mr. Drover submits, is now in a
conflict of interest given their current role as Commission counsel.
matter in the British Columbia Supreme Court, in which he makes similar allegations
against his former counsel, and a June 2017 disciplinary decision of The Association of
Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta (“APEGA”) of which he was the
subject.
applications to participate in Ruling #1. The statutory provisions that govern applications
for participant status are ss. 11(4)(a)-(c) of the PIA. Those sections read as follows:
11(4) On receiving an application under subsection (3), a commission may
accept the applicant as a participant after considering all of the following:
(a) whether, and to what extent, the person's interests may be affected by
the findings of the commission;
(b) whether the person's participation would further the conduct of the
inquiry;
the inquiry.
include (Ruling #1 at para. 11):
a. the nature and extent of the applicant’s rights or interest;
b. why standing is necessary to protect or advance the applicant’s rights or
interest;
c. whether the applicant faces the possibility of adverse comment or
criticism with respect to its conduct;
d. how the applicant intends to participate, and how this approach will assist
the Commission in fulfilling its mandate;
e. whether and how the applicant’s participation will contribute to the
thoroughness and fairness of process;
f. whether the applicant has expertise and experience relevant to the
Commission’s work;
g. whether and to what extent the applicant’s perspective or interest
overlaps or duplicates other applicants’; and
h. whether the applicant may participate in another capacity — for example,
as a witness who may testify — instead of being granted formal standing.
rights and interests might be affected over the course of the Commission process.
Consideration of whether an applicant’s participation will contribute to the fairness of the
process requires attention to the non-exhaustive list of factors outlined in Baker v.
Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 817.
D. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION
interests, as an individual applicant. Neither his submissions nor his affidavit address
the issue of how his various complaints or disputes with the RCMP bear any connection
to money laundering in British Columbia. Mr. Drover does not face the possibility of
adverse comment or criticism with respect to his conduct. His name has not come up in
the course of the lengthy hearings of the Commission, which are nearing completion at
this point. In my view, standing is unnecessary to protect or advance any identified
interest. This weighs against granting participant status.
laundering scheme have, on their face, relevance to the Commission’s Terms of
Reference, he has provided no substantive evidence in favour of those allegations.
Instead, Mr. Drover has provided submissions on what he alleges is a campaign by
various people against him. This weighs against granting participant status.
assistance and subsequent retaining of counsel are unconnected to the Commission’s
mandate. They are matters between Mr. Drover and those parties, to be resolved
outside of the Inquiry process.
disciplinary hearing before a Hearing Panel convened pursuant to the Alberta
Engineering and Geoscience Professions Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. E-11. Although
Mr. Drover rejects the legitimacy of that hearing process, beyond making generalized
allegations, Mr. Drover has not provided any persuasive foundation for his allegations
concerning the legitimacy of that hearing process.
speculative allegations against the parties “with the express intent of damaging” them in
a manner that “was clearly unprofessional” (p. 1).
…when various agencies refused to accept Mr. Drover’s allegations, he made
serious allegations against these agencies, alleging cover-ups and complicity in
fraudulent activity without any objective facts to support his suspicions and
allegations.
1 Regarding the Conduct of David Drover, Case No. 16-010-FH (16 June 2017), <
https://www.apega.ca/docs/default-source/pdfs/discipline-decisions/discipline/16-010-
fh.pdf?sfvrsn=96d65776_2>
[19] The Hearing Panel also found, at p. 2, that “where anyone did not agree with
Mr. Drover’s allegations, they became, in his view part of a large conspiracy to cover up
fraudulent and illegal activities.”
Panel found that Mr. Drover was “ungovernable.”
participation of Mr. Drover is manifestly unlikely to further the conduct of the Inquiry or
contribute to its fairness. In my view, Mr. Drover’s participation in this hearing is likely to
deflect it from dealing with the significant issues set out in the Commission’s Terms of
Reference and cause it to become embroiled in matters that are entirely extraneous to
its purpose. In all the circumstances, I am thus not satisfied that Mr. Drover meets the
criteria for participant status and accordingly, I dismiss his application.
THE DISCIPLINE FILE
Date:June 16, 2017 Case No.: 16-010-FH
REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF
DAVID DROVER, P.GEO.
Pursuant to the Engineering and Geoscience Professions
Act, an APEGA Disciplinary Hearing was held on
August 15 and 16, 2016. The hearing addressed six
allegations of unprofessional conduct concerning
David H. Drover, P.Geo. Although he was served with
the Notice of Hearing, Mr. Drover refused to attend the
hearing and suggested that the Hearing Panel had no
jurisdiction to proceed. The Hearing Panel determined
that it did have the jurisdiction to proceed and the
hearing proceeded in Mr. Drover’s absence.
After hearing the 4 witnesses called by the
Investigative Committee and reviewing the evidence
that was produced and entered by the Investigative
Committee, the Hearing Panel found that Mr. Drover
was guilty of unprofessional conduct contrary to s.
44(1) of the Engineering and Geoscience Professions
Act, in have failed to conduct himself with integrity,
honesty, fairness, and objectivity; or in having failed
to uphold and enhance the dignity and honour of his
profession by acting in a manner that harms or tends
to harm the standing of the profession generally, and
which contravenes Rules 3 and 5 of the Code of Ethics,
in respect to the following allegations:
1(a) Commencing in February 2015 and continuing
thereafter on an ongoing basis sending numerous
emails which are unprofessional, both in content
and tone, to various individuals, corporations, and
agencies, including APEGA, the Alberta Securities
Commission, and the College of Paramedics,
alleging improper conduct on the part of
[Complainant A];
1(b) Commencing in June 2015 and continuing
thereafter on an ongoing basis sending numerous
emails which are unprofessional, both in content
and tone, to various individuals, corporations and
agencies, including APEGA, the Alberta Securities
Commission, and the College of Paramedics,
alleging that [Company B] is involved in illegal
activities;
2. Sending numerous emails which are
unprofessional both in content and tone
thereafter on an ongoing basis to employees and
representatives of APEGA;
3. Sending communications which are
unprofessional in both tone and content to
individuals and agencies, including APEGA, the
Royal Canadian Mounted Police, the Alberta
Securities Commission, and the College of
Paramedics commencing in June 2015 and
continuing thereafter;
4. Sending an email dated November 20, 2015,
which was unprofessional in both content and
tone to [Person C], copying members of the Board
of Directors of [Company D];
5(a) Acting in an abusive, harassing and vulgar
manner toward [Complainant E] before, during
and after a meeting of [Company F] on June 30,
2015;
5(b) Making crude and vulgar comments about
[Complainant E]’s wife during or after a meeting
of [Company F] on June 30, 2015;
6. Publishing blog posts which are unprofessional
in both content and tone at [website blog G]
commencing in February 2016 and thereafter on
an ongoing basis.
In its decision the Hearing Panel found that
making allegations of criminal conduct against an
individual and a corporation based only on speculation
and sending these allegations to family, business
associates, other shareholders, and regulators, with
the express intent of damaging [Complainant A], was
clearly unprofessional. The Hearing Panel noted that
Mr. Drover made these allegations as statements of
fact in numerous complaints to regulators in Canada
and the United States and in the many emails sent to
individuals. He continued to make these allegations,
despite the fact that the allegations were reviewed and
not accepted by the Alberta Securities Commission,
the RCMP, the Canada Revenue Agency, and the
Toronto Stock Exchange. The Hearing Panel stated
that harassing individuals and public agencies with a
continuous flow of threats and accusations was clear
and serious unprofessional conduct.
In respect to the allegations relating to emails sent
to the employees and representatives of APEGA, the
Hearing Panel found that the accusations made by
collusion with [Complainant A], conspiracy to cover
up illegal activity, and suggestions of responding to
political interference were groundless and showed a
blatant disrespect for his professional regulating body
and demonstrated a lack of integrity and objectivity.
The Hearing Panel found that this conduct harmed
the honour, dignity, and reputation of APEGA by
rejecting and insulting the authority of APEGA and by
attempting to limit or restrict APEGA’s public duty to
carry out its investigation of the complaints against
Mr. Drover.
In respect to emails sent to agencies including
APEGA, the RCMP, Alberta Treasury Branches,
the Alberta Securities Commission, the Office of
the Premier, and the Prime Minister of Canada, the
Hearing Panel found that Mr. Drover expanded his
allegations concerning [Complainant A] to almost
everyone who had any form of relationship with
[Complainant A] or [Company B]. The Hearing Panel
found that Mr. Drover showed a clear pattern of
seeking out individuals who he believed had some
connection with [Complainant A] or [Company B]
and then sending emails to their employers or
associates that suggested that they were involved in a
$100-million fraud.
The Hearing Panel also found that when various
agencies refused to accept Mr. Drover’s allegations,
he made serious allegations against these agencies,
alleging cover-ups and complicity in fraudulent activity
without any objective facts to support his suspicions
and allegations. The Hearing Panel noted that where
anyone did not agree with Mr. Drover’s allegations,
they became, in his view, part of a large conspiracy to
cover up fraudulent and illegal activities.
The Hearing Panel also found that Mr. Drover
was guilty of unprofessional conduct for making
very serious allegations of misconduct against a
fellow professional, questioning that professional’s
competence and integrity based on suspicions and
assumptions without adequate investigation or
information, with a clear intent to injure the reputation
and interests of that professional. It also found that
Mr. Drover engaged in abusive, harassing, and vulgar
conduct before and after a business meeting.
postings made by Mr. Drover on a blog that he
commenced in February 2016 included the same
allegations made by Mr. Drover in his emails and
communications with various parties that were dealt
with in the previous charges. However, the blog
also included new materials and further articles and
comments, expanding on Mr. Drover’s allegations and
attempting to set out a narrative that purported to
expose an elaborate fraud, and the many individuals
and companies and agencies that were alleged to
be complicit in the alleged fraud. The blog made
clear that Mr. Drover was attempting to publicize
as broadly as possible the names, LinkedIn profiles,
pictures, and correspondence of all the individuals,
corporations, judge, lawyers, government agencies,
and politicians that he alleged were involved in a
broad-based conspiracy centring on the alleged illegal
activities of [Company B] and [Complainant A] in an
attempt to cause as much damage to the reputations
of everyone named.
After receiving submissions from the Investigative
Committee and Mr. Drover, the Hearing Panel found
that Mr. Drover was ungovernable. It noted that Mr.
Drover’s actions and his ongoing statements made
clear that he refused to be governed by APEGA. It
found that a Member who was ungovernable could not
be permitted to remain as a Member of the profession
and noted that if APEGA could not govern Mr. Drover,
then Mr. Drover could not be permitted to be a mem-
ber of APEGA.
The Hearing Panel then made the following orders:
a. an order that Mr. Drover’s registration is cancelled;
b. an order that Mr. Drover is ineligible permanently
for registration with APEGA, unless an order
is made by the Council reinstating Mr. Drover
pursuant to section 75(3) of the Engineering and
Geoscience Professions Act and section 47 of the
General Regulation;
c. an order that Mr. Drover pay a fine of $10,000;
d. an order that Mr. Drover pay costs of the
proceedings totaling $129,502.25 plus GST;
e. an order that this decision and the orders on
sanctions be published in full, including Mr.
Drover’s name, in The PEG magazine, on the
APEGA website, and distributed to all other
of Professional Geoscientists in Canada.
Signed,
KEVIN SARETSKY, P.ENG.
Panel Chair, APEGA Discipline Committee
GRANT HALLAM, P.ENG.
Panel Member, APEGA Discipline Committee
Panel Member, APEGA Discipline Committee
NASER RABBANI, P.ENG.
Panel Member, APEGA Discipline Committee
MURIEL DUNNIGAN
Public Member, APEGA Discipline Committee
Decision Date: March 20, 2017
Sanction Decision Date: June 16, 2017
EMEREX OIL AND GAS LTD v DROVER, 2016 ABQB 420
MCCARTHY J
4.22: Considerations for security for costs order
Case Summary
The Plaintiff commenced an Action against the Defendants for breach of fiduciary duty. The Defendants filed a Counterclaim against the Plaintiff and its officers for negligent statements, oppressive conduct, breach of duty, conspiracy and defamation. The Defendants by Counterclaim applied for an Order for Security for Costs, pursuant to Rule 4.22, with respect to the Counterclaim.
Justice McCarthy noted that Rule 4.22 and section254 of the Business Corporations Act, RSA 2000, c B-9 provided the framework for the analysis in this case. Rule 4.22 is applicable to individuals. His Lordship stated that Rule 4.22 requires that the Court analyse the appropriateness of Security for Costs in two steps, and must consider: all the factors outlined in Rule 4.22; and whether ordering Security for Costs is just and reasonable. No one factor in Rule 4.22 is determinative. Justice McCarthy held that, based on the outcomes of each of the enumerated factors, and the overall reasonableness of an Order for Security for Costs in the circumstances, the Defendants’ Security for Costs Application should be granted in the amount of $40,000.
Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta
Citation: Emerex Oil and Gas Ltd v Drover, 2016 ABQB 420
Date: 20160728
Docket: 1401 03156
Registry: Calgary
|
Between:
Emerex Oil and Gas Ltd.
Plaintiff - and -
David H. Drover and Emerex Resources Ltd.
Defendants |
_______________________________________________________
Honourable Mr. Justice J.T. McCarthy
_______________________________________________________
The Application
[1] The Plaintiff Emerex Oil and Gas Ltd. brought an action against the Defendants David Drover and Emerex Resources Ltd. for breach of fiduciary duty. In response, David Drover and Emerex Resources Ltd. counterclaimed against Emerex Oil and Gas Ltd., Dean Smith, Brian Hunter, Terry Bradshaw, Shane Hawryluk and Joseph Dand.
[2] For this application, the Applicants (defendants by counterclaim) Dean Smith, Brian Hunter, Terry Bradshaw and Shane Hawryluk, seek an order requiring the Respondent (counterclaimant) David Drover, to post security for costs with respect to the counterclaim. The Applicants seek $300,000 for security for costs on a solicitor-client basis. Alternatively, they seek $200,000 on a party-party basis.
The Parties
[3] The Plaintiff Emerex Oil and Gas Ltd. (‘EOGL’) is a corporation registered pursuant to the laws of Alberta. EOGL was incorporated on March 29, 2011 and has been carrying on petroleum exploration and development in Saskatchewan. Its head office is in Calgary. EOGL is not participating in this application.
[4] Dean Smith is a shareholder, current director, and former officer of EOGL. He has been a director since June 2012. His positions as an officer included vice president - business development, chief executive officer and president. In their brief, the Applicants state that Mr. Smith served as an officer from June 2012 until February 7, 2014. However, one of the Applicants, Terry Bradshaw, in his January 20, 2015 Affidavit, states that Mr. Smith served as an officer of EOGL from June 2012 until September 25, 2013.
[5] Brian Hunter is a shareholder and current director of EOGL. He has been a director since October 2013.
[6] Terry Bradshaw is a shareholder, former director and former officer of EOGL. He was a director from October 30, 2013 until August 19, 2015. He served as president of EOGL from January 27, 2015 until August 19, 2015.
[7] Shane Hawryluk is a shareholder and former president of EOGL. In their brief, the Applicants state that Mr. Hawryluk was president from February 7, 2014 until January 26, 2015. However, in his January 20, 2015 Affidavit, Mr. Bradshaw states that Mr. Hawryluk became president of EOGL on November 1, 2013. The Applicants also state that the date of Mr. Hawryluk’s resignation is not in evidence.
[8] David Drover is a shareholder, former director and former officer of EOGL. From the incorporation of EOGL until October 2013, Mr. Drover was a director and officer. As an officer, his positions included president, chief executive officer, executive chairman and chief operations officer.
[9] Mr. Drover has been a resident of Castlegar, British Columbia since early 2014. According to his Affidavit sworn on May 4, 2016, Mr. Drover jointly owns his home with his wife. There is $137,250 worth of equity in his house. He also is the “sole proprietor of a numbered company registered in Alberta.” Based on his Affidavit, the nature of his interest in the numbered company is not clear. The numbered company has $200,000 worth of assets – half of which is cash. Mr. Drover owns in excess of $600,000 in shares of TSX listed companies. Finally, he also has a number of shares in the company Acapella.
[10] Emerex Resources Ltd. is not participating in this application.
Overview of Litigation
[11] The present litigation arises out of all the parties’ involvement with EOGL. All the parties in this application are investors and past or present directors or officers of EOGL.
[12] Mr. Drover incorporated EOGL in March 2011. Over the course of 2012 and 2013, he sought out investors for EOGL. A great many of the investors were his friends and family. The Applicants Dean Smith, Brian Hunter, Terry Bradshaw and Shane Hawryluk were also investors. EOGL had two financing periods: around August 2012, EOGL raised approximately $1,600,000 in share capital, and in February 2013, EOGL raised approximately $700,000.
[13] In July 2012, EOGL purchased a 1920 acre lease in Saskatchewan from Sundance Energy. The cost of the lease was $1,000, and also included the assumed liability for abandoning nine oil and gas wells. The lease was subject to forfeiture if a well was not drilled on the land within 60 days. Therefore, EOGL drilled a well in late September 2012. The well was operational and produced oil and water for two months; however, it was shut-in in November 2012 due to pump rod failure.
[14] Over the course of 2013, the relationship between the Applicants and Mr. Drover became strained, largely over the financial management of EOGL. The situation came to a head in October 2013.
[15] EOGL’s AGM was scheduled for the end of October 2013. Prior to the AGM, several shareholders requisitioned the board of EOGL to call a special shareholder’s meeting. One of the purposes of the meeting was to remove Mr. Drover from EOGL’s board. In response to the requisition, Mr. Drover resigned from the board of directors. He also resigned as president.
[16] Due to the various conflicts stemming out of these dealings, Mr. Drover filed a statement of claim against EOGL and Dean Smith on February 11, 2014; however, he discontinued his legal action on March 18, 2014.
[17] On March 21, 2014, EOGL filed a statement of claim against Mr. Drover and his company, Emerex Resources Ltd. EOGL sought damages from Mr. Drover for breach of fiduciary duties. On June 9, 2014, Mr. Drover filed a counterclaim against the Applicants and EOGL. Mr. Drover’s counterclaim included claims of negligent statements, oppressive conduct, breach of duty, conspiracy and defamation.
[18] The Applicants made this application for security for costs, with respect to the counterclaim, on January 20, 2015. However, the application was not heard until May 25, 2016.
Allegations in the Claim and Counterclaim
[19] The Applicants state in Terry Bradshaw’s January 20, 2015 Affidavit that from EOGL’s inception until October 2013, Mr. Drover controlled EOGL. He made all board decisions. During that period, EOGL’s board was composed of two people, Mr. Drover and Dean Smith. However, Mr. Drover, being the chairman of the board, held an extra deciding vote in the case of a tie. As such, Mr. Drover had ultimate control over EOGL’s board decisions.
[20] The Applicants further contend that in early 2013 they became concerned with Mr. Drover’s leadership of EOGL. The Applicants recommended several changes to Mr. Drover, such as a new board of directors and an audit committee. However, Mr. Drover refused to address the Applicants’ concerns.
[21] On October 2, 2013, due to the Applicants’ concerns, various shareholders requisitioned the board of EOGL to call a special shareholder meeting. The meeting was called to remove Mr. Drover from EOGL’s board and to elect new directors. Prior to the special meeting, Mr. Drover resigned from EOGL’s board. He also resigned as president of EOGL.
[22] At the AGM on October 30, 2013, Brian Hunter and Terry Bradshaw were elected to the board of EOGL. Dean Smith was re-elected to the board. The newly elected directors undertook a review of EOGL’s books, records and operations. Up until this time, EOGL did not have an auditor – instead, financial statements were prepared and approved on instruction from Mr. Drover. Therefore, the shareholders appointed MNP LLP as EOGL’s financial auditor. Once appointed auditor, MNP began to prepare an audited financial statement for EOGL.
[23] Prior to the October AGM, in the spring of 2013, Mr. Drover, acting for EOGL, retained Chapman Petroleum Engineering Ltd. for the purpose of preparing a report on the proved and probable oil reserves located in EOGL’s lease. Chapman finished the report in September 2013. Mr. Drover then distributed the report to the shareholders.
[24] Also, in advance of the October 2013 AGM, an information circular, signed by Mr. Drover, was issued to the shareholders. The information circular contained an unaudited financial statement for the year ending in December 31, 2012.
[25] As part of MNP’s audit of EOGL, MNP reviewed the Chapman report and the 2012 unaudited financial statement. After reviewing both documents, MNP concluded that both documents were inaccurate. The revised Chapman report reduced the proved reserves by 90% and the probable reserves by 30%. The original Chapman report grossly overvalued the reserves due to the use of inaccurate operating costs. The Applicants argue that although Mr. Drover did not supply these operating costs to Chapman Engineering, Mr. Drover, as president of EOGL, should have noticed the inaccurate operating costs upon review of the draft report. The original and revised Chapman reports appear as Exhibits C and D, respectively, in Terry Bradshaw’s January 20, 2015 Affidavit.
[26] The 2012 unaudited financial statement originally stated that the profits of EOGL for 2012 were $1,500. However, the audited financial statement found that EOGL actually experienced a loss of $1,500,000 for 2012. The unaudited and audited financial statements appear as Exhibits E and F, respectively, in Terry Bradshaw’s January 20, 2015 Affidavit.
[27] The Applicants argue that MNP’s audit of EOGL showed several other financial improprieties – all of which occurred while Mr. Drover was in control of EOGL. These financial improprieties are listed in Terry Bradshaw’s January 20, 2015 Affidavit and include: (1) EOGL management was paid salaries, despite Mr. Drover’s representation to shareholders to the contrary; (2) various expenses were reported as capital assets on EOGL’s balance sheet; (3) Mr. Drover caused EOGL to make payments for services rendered to his own company, Emerex Resources Ltd. and (4) Mr. Drover submitted expense claims to EOGL for personal or non-business related expenses.
[28] The review of EOGL’s operations by the newly elected directors also revealed several irregularities with the business operations of EOGL. These irregularities are listed in Terry Bradshaw’s January 20, 2015 Affidavit and include: (1) the cost associated with the liability for abandoning the nine wells acquired through the lease was underestimated by approximately $118,000; (2) a successful drilling program was unlikely due to the geological characteristics of the oil reserves underneath EOGL’s acquired lease and (3) Mr. Drover sought and raised $700,000 in the second financing period despite having the knowledge that the lease acquired by EOGL in 2012 would likely not support a successful drilling program.
[29] On January 29, 2014, after completing their review of EOGL, the new directors issued a report to the shareholders. The report contained their findings on EOGL. Exhibit H of Terry Bradshaw’s January 20, 2015 Affidavit contains the report to the shareholders. Mr. Drover claims that the contents of this report were defamatory.
[30] The new directors concluded that further investment into EOGL’s lease was uneconomical. Therefore, the new directors sought to sell the assets of EOGL. However, no bids or offers were received. The directors then sought to terminate the lease and abandon the wells, the estimated cost being $230,000.
[31] On February 11, 2014, Mr. Drover filed a statement of claim against EOGL and Dean Smith for the recovery of approximately $112,000 that he claimed EOGL owed to him or to his company, Emerex Resources Ltd. However, he discontinued the action on March 18, 2014.
[32] Despite Mr. Drover discontinuing his action, EOGL proceeded to file a statement of claim against Mr. Drover and Emerex Resources Ltd. on March 21, 2014.
[33] On April 29, 2014, Mr. Drover filed a defence. On June 9, 2014, he filed a counterclaim. The counterclaim, in addition to including the original Plaintiff EOGL, included Joseph Dand, Terry Bradshaw, Brian Hunter, Dean Smith and Shane Hawryluk – the latter four being the Applicants.
[34] Mr. Drover’s counterclaim outlined the following claims: (1) recovery for legitimate business expenses; (2) Emerex Resources Ltd. sought the amount that EOGL agreed to pay on its behalf with respect to services rendered by a third party; (3) the Applicants breached their fiduciary duty towards Mr. Drover through various means, including by failing to develop the lease, by not correcting the deficiencies in the revised Chapman Engineering report and by rejecting the findings of the original Chapman Engineering report; (4) the Applicants conspired against Mr. Drover and unlawfully and fraudulently injured Mr. Drover and (5) Mr. Drover was defamed by the various shareholder reports and emails authored by the new directors.
[35] The Applicants filed a defence to the counterclaim on June 13, 2014 and served their affidavit of records on July 30, 2014. Mr. Drover and ERL served their affidavits of records in February 2016. Mr. Drover’s affidavit of records is 170 pages in length and lists 20,800 producible documents. The Applicants affidavit of records lists 224 records.
[36] The Applicants first filed their application for security for costs on January 20, 2015 at which time Mr. Drover had not served his affidavit of records on the Applicants. The application was originally scheduled for February 5, 2015; however, it was rescheduled to October 13, 2015 by consent. The application was further adjourned on September 18, 2015 and this matter was placed into case management on October 7, 2015.
Issues
[37] The two issues to be resolved are:
1. Whether the Plaintiff by counterclaim, Mr. Drover, should be required to pay security for costs prior to proceeding with his counterclaim?
2. If yes, what amount of security should be ordered?
The Law
[38] Rule 4.22 of the Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010 (the “Rules”) and s 254 of the Business Corporations Act, RSA 2000, c B-9 provide the framework for deciding security for costs applications. Section 254 of the Business Corporations Act is applicable exclusively to bodies corporate (Amex Electrical Ltd v 726934 Alberta Ltd, 2014 ABQB 66 at para 6, 582 AR 304 [Amex]). Rule 4.22 of the Rules is applicable to individuals. Rule 4.22 states that:
The Court may order a party to provide security for payment of a costs award if the Court considers it just and reasonable to do so, taking into account all of the following:
(a) whether it is likely the applicant for the order will be able to enforce an order or judgment against assets in Alberta;
(b) the ability of the respondent to the application to pay the costs award;
(c) the merits of the action in which the application is filed;
(d) whether an order to give security for payment of a costs award would unduly prejudice the respondent’s ability to continue the action;
(e) any other matter the Court considers appropriate.
[39] Rule 4.22 of the Rules establishes a two-step security for costs analysis. First, the court must consider all the factors outlined in Rule 4.22. Second, the court should consider whether ordering the security for costs is just and reasonable (Attila Dogan Construction and Installation Co Inc v AMEC Americas Limited, 2011 ABQB 175 at paras 24-25, 504 AR 295 [AMEC]).
Applicants’ Positions on Security for Costs
[40] The Applicants lay out five reasons supporting this security for costs application. These reasons mirror the factors outlined in Rule 4.22.
[41] For the first factor under Rule 4.22, the Applicants state that they will be unable to enforce an order or judgment against assets in Alberta. The Applicants argue that Mr. Drover has few, if any, assets in Alberta. His home, which is jointly owned with his wife, is in British Columbia. Mr. Drover does not own any real estate in Alberta and it is unclear where his various shareholdings are situated. Therefore, the Applicants argue that they will not be able to enforce a costs award against Mr. Drover’s assets in Alberta.
[42] For the second factor, the Applicants argue in their brief that Mr. Drover has testified that he has sufficient assets to pay a costs award. The Applicants argue that Mr. Drover’s ability to pay favours ordering a security for costs award. Conversely, in their security for costs application, the Applicants state that Mr. Drover would be unable to pay costs in the event that the Applicants were successful in defending this action. Presumably, the Applicants meant that they would be unable to collect a costs award, as Mr. Drover had no assets in Alberta.
[43] For the third factor, the Applicants argue that they have a reasonably meritorious defence against Mr. Drover’s claim. The Applicants state that the merits of the case should only be considered on the basis of undisputed facts and the pleadings (Provalcid Inc v Graff, 2014 ABQB 453 at para 97, 591 AR 117 [Provalcid]). The Applicants bring forward various defences against Mr. Drover’s claims of breach of fiduciary duty, oppression, conspiracy and defamation.
[44] Against Mr. Drover’s claims of oppression and breach of fiduciary duty, the Applicants argue the business judgment rule, which is a defence for business decisions made by directors as long as the decisions lie within a range of reasonable alternatives (Peoples Department Stores Inc v Wise, 2004 SCC 68 at paras 64 to 67, [2004] 3 SCR 461). The Applicants argue that their decision to abandon the wells on EOGL’s lease was made after consulting with Chapman Engineering and MNP, two independent companies. The Applicants also acknowledge that, due to s 243(3) of the Business Corporations Act, a complainant in oppression is not required to post security for costs. The Applicants do not seek security for costs for the oppression portion of the counterclaim. However, they seek security for costs for the remainder of the counterclaim.
[45] Against the claim of conspiracy, the Applicants allege that as shareholders of EOGL, they had a statutory right to requisition board members to have a shareholder meeting to remove Mr. Drover as a director. The Applicants further believe that Mr. Drover’s alleged mismanagement of EOGL was sufficient cause to seek his removal as a director.
[46] Against the claims of defamation, the Applicants argue that they have defences pursuant to the principles of justification, fair comment and qualified privilege. The Applicants contend that the statements made in the allegedly defamatory material, which were two shareholder reports and two emails authored by Mr. Bradshaw, were true statements made carefully in reliance on information received from EOGL’s professional advisors. The Applicants also argue these statements were made without malice.
[47] With respect to qualified privilege, the Applicants argue that the director-shareholder relationship established a qualified privilege over the allegedly defamatory communications. The statements were made by Terry Bradshaw, who was then a director of EOGL. As a director of EOGL, he had a duty to convey information about EOGL to the various shareholders.
[48] For the fourth factor, the Applicants argue that Mr. Drover has sufficient assets to pay a costs award. Therefore, Mr. Drover would not be unduly prejudiced by an order to pay security for costs.
[49] For the fifth factor, the Applicants list three specific considerations that were mentioned in Provalcid at paragraphs 90 to 92 and 104 to 108. The considerations were (a) whether the application was brought at the earliest opportunity, (b) whether the applicant seeks security for steps already taken and (c) whether the resolution of the issues is important to the community.
[50] For timeliness, the Applicants argue that the application was brought very early in the proceeding. The Applicants state that they do not seek security for any step taken to date in this matter. The Applicants argue that there is nothing of public importance in Mr. Drover’s counterclaim. The dispute is private in nature. There are no public interest issues that warrant special consideration.
[51] With respect to whether ordering security for costs would be just and reasonable, the Applicants point to the alleged behaviour of Mr. Drover during these proceedings. In their brief, the Applicants point to Mr. Drover’s inappropriate communication with the Applicants’ counsel; Mr. Drover’s inappropriate comments made online against the Applicants’ families; Mr. Drover’s direct communication with the court; Mr. Drover’s contemptuous attitude toward the Court and the ballooning of legal expenses due to Mr. Drover’s conduct.
[52] The Applicants argue that Mr. Drover’s conduct is relevant in deciding whether it is just and reasonable to order security for costs. The Applicants cite paragraph 41 of Amex in support of their argument: “A litigant whose lack of resources or their location immunizes him from some of the factors which cause a person to behave as a responsible litigant is a liability to the court system.” The Applicants argue that Amex gives further justification for ordering Mr. Drover to pay security for costs.
[53] With respect to amount, the Applicants argue that Mr. Drover should pay $300,000 for security for costs on a solicitor-client basis. Alternatively, they seek $200,000 on a party-party basis.
[54] Relying on the factors set out in Pillar Resources Services Inc v Primewest Energy Inc, 2016 ABQB 120, [2016] AWLD 1366 [Pillar], the Applicants argue that costs should be awarded on a solicitor-client basis. Due to the size of Mr. Drover’s affidavit of records, and the time required to prepare for trial, the Applicant’s argue that the legal fees from the present time forward would be $300,000.
[55] In the alternative, the Applicants submit a draft bill of costs, which is Exhibit A in Mr. Bradshaw’s April 8, 2016 Affidavit. The amount in the draft bill of costs is $101,500.00. However, the Applicants argue that a multiple should be applied to the party-party costs, resulting in party-party costs of $200,000.
Respondent’s Position on Security for Costs
[56] Mr. Drover pointed to two potential statutory provisions that govern security for costs applications: s 254 of the Business Corporations Act and Rule 4.22 of the Rules. Mr. Drover argues that s 254 of the Business Corporations Act should not be used to determine this application.
[57] Mr. Drover, in his brief, listed factors that increase and decrease the likelihood of a security for costs order. These factors are from Amex at paragraphs 74 and 75. The only listed factor that Mr. Drover comments on is whether the Applicants failed to apply for security for costs at the earliest convenience. Mr. Drover argues that the security for costs claim was filed 10 months after the statement of claim.
[58] In his brief, Mr. Drover stated that he has always been agreeable to pay securities for cost. Also, Mr. Drover stated in his oral submissions that he is still agreeable to paying security for costs. He has offered his Acapella shares as security for cost. In his brief, Mr. Drover stated that his “Acapella shares…are valued anywhere between $100k and $300k depending on which valuation of Acapella one believes.” However, during oral argument, he stated that the Acapella shares are worthless.
[59] Despite being agreeable to pay security for costs, Mr. Drover stated that he is somewhat reluctant to pay security for costs. His reasons are: (1) the Applicants have rejected his offers to pay security for costs prior to this application; (2) in British Columbia security for costs are rarely awarded against individual plaintiffs; (3) Mr. Drover has assets in Alberta against which the Applicants will be able to enforce their judgment. Mr. Drover claims that his numbered company is an asset he owns in Alberta. Also, he states that his house in Castlegar, British Columbia can serve as an asset because British Columbia is a reciprocating jurisdiction with Alberta; (3) Mr. Drover claims that he has enough assets to pay costs if they are ordered against him; (4) he claims that the Applicants’ case has no merit whatsoever. In particular, they have no defence to his counterclaim; (5) Mr. Drover argues that paying $300,000 in security for costs will prejudice his ability to continue his counterclaim since he has accrued hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal expenses up to date. He needs the money for living expenses.
Analysis and Decision
Issue 1: Security for Costs
[60] I accept Mr. Drover’s position that Rule 4.22 of the Rules, and not s 254 of the Business Corporations Act, is applicable in this application for security for costs. The Applicants are seeking security for costs from Mr. Drover in his personal capacity, not from a corporation. Therefore, Rule 4.22 applies. I will proceed under Rule 4.22. The five factors to be considered under Rule 4.22 are:
(a) whether it is likely the applicant for the order will be able to enforce an order or judgment against assets in Alberta;
(b) the ability of the respondent to the application to pay the costs award;
(c) the merits of the action in which the application is filed;
(d) whether an order to give security for payment of a costs award would unduly prejudice the respondent’s ability to continue the action;
(e) any other matter the Court considers appropriate.
[61] I will consider each enumerated factor, after which I will determine whether it is just and reasonable to order security for costs in the circumstances.
(a) Likelihood of Enforcing an Order or Judgment Against Assets in Alberta
[62] Based on the evidence provided by Mr. Drover, he owns no exigible property in Alberta. His Alberta numbered company, being incorporated, is shielded from any judgment or order made against him personally. All the rest of his declared assets are held outside of Alberta. This factor favours an order for security for costs.
(b) Ability to Pay Costs
[63] Mr. Drover claims to have sufficient assets to pay any costs award. He therefore argues that the Applicants have not established that he cannot pay any potential costs award. This is true. In fact, the Applicants agree that Mr. Drover has sufficient assets to pay any costs award. The Applicants argue that Mr. Drover’s ability to pay the costs award supports the order for security for costs. However, the Applicants are mistaken.
[64] The party seeking security for costs bears the initial onus to establish, on a balance of probabilities, that the respondent will be unable to pay its costs if the defence is successful. If the applicant satisfies this onus, the evidentiary burden shifts to the respondent to show why the Court should not exercise its discretion to make such an order against it: Amex; Provalcid.
[65] Therefore, the Applicants are incorrect to state that Mr. Drover’s ability to pay for costs favours an order for security for costs. It does not. Mr. Drover’s ability to pay costs disfavours an order for security for costs. Had this application fallen under s 254 of the Business Corporations Act, Mr. Drover’s ability to pay costs would have been determinative – for the sole criterion under s 254 of the Business Corporations Act is whether the respondent “will be unable to pay the costs.” However, this application is being made under Rule 4.22.
[66] Under Rule 4.22, I need only consider Mr. Drover’s ability to pay costs – after which I must determine whether it is just and reasonable to order security for costs. The ability to pay costs is one factor to consider under Rule 4.22 and is not determinative. This principle is from Autoweld Systems Ltd v CRC-Evans Pipeline International Inc, 2011 ABQB 265, 504 AR 288, where Justice McMahon stated:
I need not determine that …[the Plaintiff] "will be unable to pay the costs". The mandate is merely to consider the ability of …[the Plaintiff] to pay in determining what is just and reasonable.
[67] Therefore, while both parties admit that Mr. Drover can pay costs, this admission does not determine the security for costs analysis. Justice McMahon continued on:
[68] As I have described, the Plaintiff is not insolvent…. Nevertheless, the modest net assets of …[the Plaintiff] suggests a real risk of an inability to pay substantial costs after protracted and expensive litigation. What is a viable business today may not be so at the end of this litigation.
[69] These words are very apt to the present situation. I do not see Mr. Drover’s current ability to pay costs as indicative that he will be able to pay costs in the future – nor do I consider this factor to be determinative in the analysis.
(c) Merits of the Action
[70] When considering the merits of the action “a reasonably meritorious defence, when considered together with the other factors set out in Rule 4.22, is sufficient to weigh in favour of granting security for costs. It is neither possible, nor desireable, for the Court at this stage to determine which party’s case is stronger” (AMEC at para 17).
[71] Against Mr. Drover’s claims of unpaid expenses, oppression, breach of fiduciary duties, conspiracy and defamation, the Applicants allege a number of defences, which I have listed above in paragraphs 43 to 47. While deciding nothing final with respect to the merits of these defences, these defences are all reasonably meritorious. As the Applicants have stated, I am only to consider the merits of the case “on the basis of undisputed facts, the pleadings, ...and not on the basis of seriously disputed facts or assessments of credibility” (Provalcid at para 97).
[72] Against Mr. Drover’s claim of oppression, the Applicants put forward the business judgment rule defence. Mr. Drover argues that Chapman Engineering and MNP were colluding with the Applicants to ruin his company. Therefore, the advice Chapman Engineering and MNP gave to the Applicants was, according to Mr. Drover, not independent. However, whether or not the advice was independent is not for me to presently decide. Based on the pleadings of the Applicants, the business judgment rule is a meritorious defence. The same applies to the other defences put forward by the Applicants.
[73] For their defence against the claim of conspiracy, the Applicants claim that they had a statutory right to requisition board members to have a shareholder meeting to remove Mr. Drover as a director. The Applicants further claim that Mr. Drover’s mismanagement of EOGL was sufficient cause to seek his removal as a director. Based on undisputed facts, the Applicants had a statutory right under s 142 of the Business Corporations Act to requisition board members to hold a meeting to remove Mr. Drover as a board member. Based on the facts pled by the Applicants, they had sufficient grounds to call the meeting. Therefore, they have a reasonably meritorious defence against the claim of conspiracy.
[74] Against the claims of defamation, the Applicants argue that they have defences pursuant to the principles of justification, fair comment and qualified privilege. Again, based on undisputed facts and on the facts which the Applicants pled, the Applicants were directors making representations to shareholders on the state of EOGL. Therefore, the defences are reasonably meritorious. Since the Applicants’ defences are reasonably meritorious, this factor favours an order for security for costs.
(d) Undue Prejudice
[75] Mr. Drover also claims that “paying significant security for costs of $300k” would prejudice his ability to continue his counterclaim. However, Mr. Drover does not object to paying some amount of security for cost. His true objection lies in the amount the order should be for, not whether the order should be made. Therefore, I do not find there will be any undue prejudice in making a security for costs order.
[76] Also, Mr. Drover has stated that he would be able to pay any costs award made against him. I am not sure how he can pay any order for costs, but would be unduly prejudiced by an order to pay security for costs. Lastly, based on the evidence given by Mr. Drover, he currently has assets in excess of $800,000. These funds seem sufficient to continue his counterclaim, even in spite of a security for costs order made against him.
(e) Other Factors
[77] Both parties have mentioned several other factors that I will consider. I do not see the need to consider any other factors not mentioned by either party.
[78] Mr. Drover alleged that the Applicants delayed in bringing this application. He states that the security for costs claim was filed 10 months after the statement of claim. It should be noted that the security for costs application was made in response to the counterclaim, which was filed 2.5 months after the statement of claim was filed. Therefore, the alleged delay was 7.5 months, not 10 months.
[79] However, Mr. Drover does not argue that the alleged delay resulted in any sort of prejudice. From Pocklington Foods Inc v Alberta (Provincial Treasurer), 1994 CanLII 18373 (AB KB), 153 AR 288 at para 9 (ABQB), [1994] AWLD 436 [Pocklington]:
Even if there has been some delay on the part of the defendant in the present case, the order should be granted unless the plaintiff shows that it suffered some prejudice from the delay, or was induced into believing it was safe in incurring costs without risking facing an order for security for costs.
[80] Since the alleged delay in bringing this application did not produce any prejudice, and since the Applicants are not seeking security for steps already taken, the delay does not weigh against ordering security for costs.
[81] Mr. Drover also argued that he has offered his Acapella shares to the Applicants as security for cost. His offer was allegedly rejected. While I make no finding with respect to the nature of the Acapella shares, Mr. Drover’s assertion during his oral argument that his Acapella shares are worthless largely explains why the Applicants would not accept his offer. Therefore, the fact that Mr. Drover offered his Acapella shares as security for costs does not weigh against ordering security for costs.
[82] The Applicants, citing Provalcid, have put forward three additional factors for my consideration. The factors are (a) whether the application was brought at the earliest opportunity, (b) whether the applicant seeks security for steps already taken and (c) whether the resolution of the issues is important to the community.
[83] Based on Provalcid, the timeliness of the application weighs in favour of ordering security for costs. I find there is not enough information to make a determination as to the timeliness of the application. Also, as I mentioned above, Mr. Drover did not experience any prejudice with respect to the timeliness or untimeliness of this application. Therefore, this particular factor does not favour or disfavor the application.
[84] The Applicants are not seeking security for any step taken to date in this matter. Based on Provalcid, this factor favours ordering security for costs.
[85] Lastly, I agree with the Applicants that the resolution of this dispute is not important to the greater community. This is a private dispute. Based on Provalcid, this factor favours ordering security for costs.
(f) Just and Reasonable
[86] My decision on security for costs is discretionary; however, this discretion must be the product of a rational process (Amex at para 71).
[87] In this particular case, I find that it is just and reasonable to order Mr. Drover to pay security for costs. Mr. Drover has no exigible assets in Alberta. Therefore, there is the possibility that he could escape payment of costs if the Applicants successfully defend this action. The Applicants have a meritorious defence and Mr. Drover would not suffer undue prejudice if security for costs was ordered. Lastly, Mr. Drover himself has stated that he is amenable to paying security for costs. For all of these reasons, I find that it is just and reasonable to order security for costs.
Issue 2: Amount of Security for Costs
[88] The Applicants seek $300,000 for security for costs on a solicitor-client basis. Alternatively, they seek $200,000 on a party-party basis.
[89] Alberta courts have stated that security for costs can be awarded on a solicitor-client basis where it is likely that the costs will be awarded on a solicitor-client basis (Hamza v Hamza, 1997 ABCA 263 at para 17, 200 AR 342; Canada Deposit Insurance Corp v Canadian Commercial Bank, 1989 ABCA 150 at paras 24 – 26, 61 DLR (4th) 161; Prairie Land Corp v Concert Properties Ltd, 2004 ABQB 726 at para 14, 364 AR 283).
[90] In arguing that the security for costs order should be made on a solicitor-client basis, the Applicants rely on the factors set out in Pillar at paragraph 2. These factors are:
a) engaged in blameworth conduct during the trial;
b) unduly prolonged the trial;
c) was guilty of misconduct prior to the litigation;
d) alleged fraud and failed to prove it; and
e) that justice would be served by such an award.
[91] I find that these factors are not applicable to the present application. Two of the factors listed involve trial behaviour. The fourth factor, an unproven accusation of fraud, is particularly problematic as fraud forms one of the very causes of action Mr. Drover is pleading. The cause of action pled by Mr. Drover cannot be used by the Applicants as evidence justifying solicitor-client costs – especially when the claim has not been tried on its merits. Also, assessing these factors prior to trial delves too deeply into the merits of this case. At this point, such a determination would be premature.
[92] Otherwise, cases have cited the principle that the amount of security should cover the probable costs of the suit. (ArcelorMittal Tubular Products Roman SA v Canadian Natural Resources Ltd, 2010 ABQB 552 at para 31, 503 AR 391; Pocklington at para 20; Home Exchange (Alberta) Ltd v Goodyear Canada Inc, 2001 ABQB 673 at para 14, 291 AR 295).
[93] I find that security for costs should be made on a party-party basis. Obviously, my decision has no bearing on the trial judge’s decision on costs.
[94] The Applicants allege that they will incur $200,000 in party-party costs on a go-forward basis. The amount cited in the Applicants’ draft bill of costs is $101,500. They argue that party-party costs should be awarded as a multiple of the draft bill of costs. However, I do not think this is a case where it would be appropriate to order costs based on a multiple of the draft bill of costs. Rather, costs should be based on a single set of Schedule C costs.
[95] Given the fact that Mr. Drover has claimed approximately $1,150,000.00 in damages, Schedule C costs should be calculated based on Column 4. The Applicants’ bill of costs is at the high end of the scale. In particular, the estimated length of trial and discovery are at the high end of the scale. Also, several expenses included in the bill of costs have already been incurred. Therefore, I have adjusted the bill of costs accordingly. These adjustments reduce the bill of costs to $50,000.
[96] Lastly, the Applicants did not discount the oppression claim in their bill of costs. Due to s 243 of the Business Corporations Act, security for costs cannot be received for oppression claims. Therefore, the security for costs should be discounted to account for the oppression claim. If the Court can reasonably determine what percentage of the action involves the oppression claim, security for costs may be awarded for the non-oppression portions of the plaintiff's claim (Vaasjo v Jurina, 2016 ABQB 78 at para 22). In this case, the oppression claim is clearly distinguishable from Mr. Drover’s other claims. Without more information provided, I am left to assume that all claims would require approximately equal costs. Therefore, as Mr. Drover has five claims, I will discount the security required by 20% to account for the oppression claim.
[97] Based on the above adjustments, I find that party-party costs are most accurately estimated at $40,000. The security for costs order will reflect that amount.
Conclusion
[98] The Applicants’ application is granted and the following relief is order:
1. The Respondent, Mr. Drover, is required to post security for costs for the trial of his counterclaim against the Applicants in the amount of $40,000 within two months of this decision.
2. The security is to be held until either the parties agree in writing otherwise or on further order of this Court.
3. Until the security is paid, all proceedings in the action are stayed.
4. If the security is not paid within the time period provided for by this decision, Mr. Drover’s counterclaim shall be dismissed without further notice.
[99] The Applicants are entitled to their costs of this application.
Heard on the 25th day of May, 2016.
Dated at the City of Calgary, Alberta this 28th day of July, 2016.
|
|
J.T. McCarthy J.C.Q.B.A. |
Appearances:
Mark A. Klassen
for the Plaintiff, Emerex Oil and Gas Ltd.
David H. Drover
Self-Represented Litigant
Disclosure of Contracts
| Vendor Name: | Law Offices Of Mark Klassen |
|---|---|
| Reference Number: | 115359 |
| Contract Date: | |
| Description of Work: | 0410 Legal Services |
| Contract Period: | 2014-05-10 to 2019-04-10 |
| Delivery Date: | |
| Contract Value: | $0.00 |
| Comments: | This Contract Is Issued Against A Public Works And Government Services Canada Procurement Tool. This Contract Was Competitively Sourced. |
PPSC FEDERAL CROWN OFFICE or AGENT ASSIGNED TO COURT LOCATIONS
(contact information below and on following pages)
Court Agent / Crown Court Agent / Crown
Airdrie Elliot Baker (Agent) Medicine Hat PPSC Southern Circuits4
Alexis Erwin Schulz (Agent) Morinville PPSC Edmonton2
Athabasca Erwin Schulz (Agent) Okotoks Elliot Baker (Agent)
Barrhead PPSC Edmonton3 Peace River Cam McCoy (Agent)
Bonnyville Vic Findlater (Agent) Pincher Creek PPSC Southern Circuits4
Boyle PPSC Edmonton3 Ponoka John Lee (Agent)
Breton John Lee (Agent) Red Deer Donna Derie-Gillespie (Agent)
Brooks PPSC Southern Circuits4 Red Earth Creek Cam McCoy (Agent)
Calgary PPSC Calgary1 Rimbey John Lee (Agent)
Camrose John Lee (Agent) Rocky Mountain House Donna Derie-Gillespie (Agent)
Canmore PPSC Southern Circuits4 Sherwood Park PPSC Edmonton3
Cardston PPSC Southern Circuits4 Siksika Nation PPSC Southern Circuits4
Chateh Cam McCoy (Agent) Slake Lake Cam McCoy (Agent)
Cochrane PPSC Southern Circuits4 St Albert PPSC Edmonton3
Cold Lake Andrea Hemmerling (Agent) St Paul Vic Findlater (Agent)
Coronation Donna Derie-Gillespie (Agent) Stettler Donna Derie-Gillespie (Agent)
Didsbury Elliot Baker (Agent) Stony Plain PPSC Edmonton3
Drayton Valley Erwin Schulz (Agent) Strathmore PPSC Southern Circuits4
Drumheller PPSC Southern Circuits4 Taber PPSC Southern Circuits4
Edmonton PPSC Edmonton Tsuu T’ina Nation PPSC Calgary*
Edson Erwin Schulz (Agent) Turner Valley Elliot Baker (Agent)
Evansburg Erwin Schulz (Agent) Valleyview Cam McCoy (Agent)
Fairview Cam McCoy (Agent) Vegreville Vic Findlater (Agent)
Falher Cam McCoy (Agent) Vermillion Vic Findlater (Agent)
Fort Chipewyan PPSC Fort McMurray5 Wabasca-Desmarais Cam McCoy (Agent)
Fort MacLeod PPSC Southern Circuits4 Wainwright Vic Findlater (Agent)
Fort McMurray PPSC Fort McMurray5 Westlock Erwin Schulz (Agent)
Fort Saskatchewan PPSC Edmonton3 Wetaskiwin John Lee (Agent)
Fort Vermillion Cam McCoy (Agent) Whitecourt Erwin Schulz (Agent)
Fox Creek Cam McCoy (Agent)
PPSC OFFICES CONTACT INFORMATION:Grande Cache Erwin Schulz (Agent)
Grande Prairie Kevin Lieslar (Agent)
Hanna PPSC Southern Circuits4
High Level Cam McCoy (Agent) 1 PPSC CALGARY:
ppsccalgeneral@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca 403-299-3978High Prairie Cam McCoy (Agent)
Hinton Erwin Schulz (Agent) 2 PPSC EDMONTON:
edmppscdisctm@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca 780-495-3553Jasper Erwin Schulz (Agent)
Killam John Lee (Agent) 3 PPSC EDMONTON CIRCUITS:
ppscedmcirptdis@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca 780-495-3553Lac la Biche Erwin Schulz (Agent)
Leduc John Lee (Agent) 4 PPSC SOUTHERN CIRCUITS:
ABsouthCirDisc@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca 403-299-3978Lethbridge Mark Klassen (Agent)
Lloydminster Vic Findlater (Agent) 5 PPSC FORT McMURRAY:
ppscfortmcmurray@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca 780-495-3553Mayerthorpe Erwin Schulz (Agent)
Opabin Investments LLP
Our History
Opabin Investments LLP is assembling to be a British Columbia registered LLP with real estate capital contributions as well as technology contributions. We anticipate offering units in July 2021.
Proponents
Alan G. Smith (asmith@opabinllp.com)
+1 (604) 800-0278
David Skrypichayko (davids@opabinllp.com)
+1 (780) 221-2274
Contact Us
+1 (604) 243-8605
Experience
Education
Peter Michalyshyn (Chair)
Morris Taylor (Vice Chair)
Rodney Jerke
Larry McConnell
John T. Prowse
Wilf Willier
Donald P. Kolody
Laurie Mozeson
Bart Rosborough
Farrel Shadlyn
David Skrypichayko
Mark Tims
Steve Bach (LSA)
Greg Busch (LSA)
Lindsay MacDonald (LSA)
Pamela Jenkyns (LSA
NOTICE TO THE PROFESSION
NOTICE TO: All Active Lawyers and Students-at-Law,
All Executive Directors of other Law Societies in Canada,
All Justices of the Court of Appeal and Court of Queen's Bench,
All Judges of the Provincial Court of Alberta,
All Masters in Chambers,
All Clerks of the Court
membership of David Skrypichayko of St. Albert, Alberta, effective immediately, pursuant to
section 63(1) of the Legal Profession Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. L-8. Mr. Skrypichayko’s conduct is
the subject of proceedings under Part 3 of the Legal Profession Act. The Panel considered his
suspension warranted in the circumstances.
Joseph M. Shafir Professional Corporation
14240 - 85th Avenue
Edmonton, AB T5R 3Z2
Phone: (780) 428-0731
Fax: (780) 428-0733
Deputy Executive Director &
Director, Regulation
Disposition Summary – March 18, 2016
HE20150007
The Hearing Committee found that Mr. Skrypichayko's conduct was deserving of sanction on 19
citations involving failing to serve clients, failing to respond to client communications, improperly
commissioning an affidavit, failing to provide written information as to his fees and
disbursements to a client, issuing accounts in excess of a fair and reasonable amount, failing to
render accounts in a timely manner and concurrent with the transfer of trust funds, failing to
conduct himself with civility and courtesy, failing to cooperate with or be candid with the Law
Society, holding himself out as an active member, failing to advise of his status as a suspended
member, and practicing law while suspended.
In an oral decision, the Hearing Committee ordered Mr. Skrypichayko disbarred immediately.
SKRYPICHAYKO v LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA, 2020 ABQB 461
ROOKE ACJ
3.68: Court options to deal with significant deficiencies
9.4: Signing judgments and orders
Case Summary
This was an Application reviewed by Associate Chief Justice Rooke as being an Apparently Vexatious Application or Proceeding (“AVAP”). Pursuant to Civil Practice Note No 7, Associate Chief Justice Rooke ordered that the Applicant had 14 days to provide written submissions to the Court to “show cause” as to why the AVAP should not be struck pursuant to Rule 3.68.
Associate Chief Justice Rooke also ruled that the Applicant’s approval of the Order granted was dispensed with pursuant to Rule 9.4(2)(c).
Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta
Citation: Skrypichayko v Law Society of Alberta, 2020 ABQB 461
Date: 20200812
Dockets: 1903 05792, 1903 09847
Registry: Edmonton
Between:
1903 05792
David Skrypichayko
Plaintiff
- and -
Law Society of Alberta
Defendant
1903 09847
David Skrypichayko
Plaintiff
- and -
The Attorney General of Canada, the Attorney General of Alberta, the Minister of Service Alberta, Justice Peter Michalyshyn, RCMP "K" Division, Randall (Randy) McGinnis, Robert MacMullen, and Shayne Saskiw
Defendants
_______________________________________________________
Honourable Associate Chief Justice J.D. Rooke
_______________________________________________________
I. Introduction
[1] On March 18, 2019, David Skrypichayko (Mr. Skrypichayko) filed a Statement of Claim against the Law Society of Alberta (the LSA) (1st Action). The LSA filed a Statement of Defence on November 22, 2019.
[2] Subsequently, on May 10, 2019, Mr. Skrypichayko filed another Statement of Claim, naming a number of government actors, the RCMP, a justice of the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench, and several individuals as Defendants (2nd Action).
[3] On October 21, 2019, the 2nd Action was struck against most of the Defendants; the remaining Defendants are the Honourable Justice Peter B. Michalyshyn (Justice Michalyshyn) and two individuals, Robert MacMullen (Mr. MacMullen) and Shayne Saskiw (Mr. Saskiw). Mr. Saskiw filed a Statement of Defence on October 17, 2019. Justice Michalyshyn filed a Statement of Defence on November 22, 2019.
[4] Both the 1st and 2nd Actions seek the same amounts and types of damages and are highly interrelated. In both Actions, Mr. Skrypichayko makes claims for: malfeasance in public office, negligent investigation, abuse of process, breach of statutory duty, malicious prosecution, assault, libel, and maintaining a hostile regulatory environment.
[5] Under Civil Practice Note No. 7 (CPN7), litigants may request that a justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench review a Statement of Claim as a possible Apparently Vexatious Application or Proceeding (AVAP). I am one of the judges assigned to review AVAPs filed in the Court of Queen’s Bench.
[6] On March 3, 2020, two requests were received from Counsel for the LSA and Counsel for Justice Michalyshyn (the same Counsel acts for both parties), to review the 1st and 2nd Actions under CPN7. On March 13, 2020, a similar request was received from Counsel for Mr. Saskiw.
[7] I have reviewed the 1st and 2nd Actions and conclude these documents are AVAPs because they have many elements that the courts have said indicate they may be hopeless and abusive proceedings. On that basis, the Actions will be subject to a CPN7 show cause document-based review pursuant to Rule 3.68 of the Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010.
II. CPN7
[8] This Court implemented CPN7 to better manage litigation that, on its face, appears to be unmeritorious, has no chance of success, or is otherwise abusive and vexatious. It is intended to provide litigants with a timely, proportionate, and cost-effective response: Unrau v National Dental Examining Board, 2018 ABQB 874 (Unrau #1).
[9] If, on initial review by the Court, an AVAP appears to have no merit, have no prospect of success, or is otherwise abusive or vexatious, then the Court issues a written decision that identifies the apparent issue or issues that may be a basis to strike out the AVAP under Rule 3.68 of the Alberta Rules of Court.
[10] The party who filed the AVAP is then given an opportunity to, within 14 days, provide the Court with a Written Submission of up to a total of 10 pages in length that responds to, and demonstrates why, the AVAP is a legitimate action and should be permitted to continue. The Written Submission must be served on the other parties to the litigation.
[11] CPN7 is not to be used for “close calls.” The Court only intervenes when the defect or defects in question are “apparent on the face of the pleading”, and the suspect pleadings are “clearer cases of abuse”: Unrau #1 at paras 22 and 24.
[12] The Court only considers restricted forms of evidence when it conducts a CPN7 review because this process has a very narrow focus and operates to examine a single document and its contents: Ubah v Canadian Natural Resources Ltd, 2019 ABQB 347 at paras 24-48 (Ubah). There are exceptions to that rule. For example, the Court may examine other documents in the same proceeding that are related to the suspect filing (Ubah at para 35), or documents and records that are evidence that the AVAP is an attempt to litigate an issue that has already been decided or closed (Ubah at para 45).
III. The Skrypichayko Actions
[13] This is an instance where a CPN7 analysis relies on additional documentation as evidence to evaluate whether a lawsuit is an abusive or hopeless proceeding. Here, there is a related dispute: Ubah at paras 35, 45. Mr. Skrypichayko was a practicing member of the LSA until he was suspended on June 18, 2013. On March 18, 2016, following an LSA disciplinary hearing, Mr. Skrypichayko was disbarred, effective immediately: Law Society of Alberta v Skrypichayko, 2016 ABLS 57 (LSA Decision).
[14] Counsel for LSA advises that Mr. Skrypichayko has appealed the LSA Decision, and the matter is still in the appeal process.
[15] Both the 1st and 2nd Actions are lengthy documents, approximately 30 pages each. Each Action relies on the same narrative and the Actions share many identical paragraphs.
A. Common Narrative
[16] The best way to summarize the 1st and 2nd Actions is to first review their common narrative. Mr. Skrypichayko indicates he began his legal practice in 2002 as a sole practitioner engaged in income tax related matters. He reports he developed “... a sophisticated ‘Audit Protocol’ ...” which he believed “... would greatly assist the Law Society in pin-pointing transactions of concern ...”. However, when Mr. Skrypichayko presented his ideas to LSA officials his concerns were not merely rejected but he was met with warnings, threats, and “... was booted out of [the LSA] Calgary offices. ...”.
[17] The Actions indicate that at that time unnamed Alberta lawyers were engaged in mortgage fraud schemes. Mr. Skrypichayko indicates that his Audit Protocol would have identified this illegal conduct. Without the Audit Protocol, “Mortgage Fraud files & claims continued to climb at the Law Society.”
[18] Mr. Skrypichayko reports he was mistreated by LSA personnel:
... Once the Law Society learned of the Plaintiff’s book on Organized White Collar Crime, their persecution & harassment of the Plaintiff intensified. The assaults continued.
... Law Society employees harassed the Plaintiff in public. One employee, Maurice Dumont, QC, the Manager of Complaints for the Law Society, would intimidate the Plaintiff at a downtown Edmonton restaurant, Metro Billiards, repeatedly. The Plaintiff became increasingly afraid of this escalating level of threats & intimidation.
... The Law Society has sent agents, employees and custodians, without justification or under contrived pretense, to the home of the Plaintiff at least 6 times with the specific intent to intimidate & threaten the Plaintiff. On several occasions, the Plaintiff was assaulted by an agent, employee or custodian of the Law Society.
The alleged assaults by LSA agents go as far back as 1997.
[19] The next development was that Mr. Skrypichayko’s licence was suspended, and he was the subject of an LSA professional conduct proceeding. Mr. Skrypichayko complains that this process, which took seven years, was intentionally delayed, “... the Law Society stalled and deceived the Plaintiff ...”. The “sophisticated delay” which occurred was discriminatory, and the LSA allegedly “pays for & encourages training” in delay processes.
[20] Instead, the allegations against Mr. Skrypichayko were trumped up and false: “... there were no serious breaches of the rules ...”. His clients were not injured by his purported misconduct. The audit report was false. The LSA’s response to alleged evidence issues was “... both negligent & malicious on the part of the Law Society.” Mr. Skrypichayko reports he was singled out and treated differently from other lawyers who were the subjects of LSA proceedings: “... the Plaintiff has received nothing but harsh treatment, unannounced meetings, false accusations (prior to investigation) and assaults.”
[21] He says his interests were not respected, and the LSA failed to acknowledge his role in attempts to combat the “Mortgage Fraud Ring”. Instead,
... the Law Society renewed & cultivated a relationship with one of the bankers in Edmonton who had been intimately involved in the Mortgage Fraud operations ...”
[22] Mr. Skrypichayko says the panel of Benchers who heard his “show trial” “... were politically & personally motivated to discredit & humiliate the Plaintiff ...” because they were “... liable ... in relation to the $500 million Mortgage Fraud Operations being run by Alberta lawyers.” This was discriminatory, and Mr. Skrypichayko was singled out:
... because he was a witness in an ongoing multi-million dollar mortgage fraud operation by Alberta lawyers; and, any attention or successful convictions associated therewith implicated the Law Society & the Benchers (who also sat as the Hearing Panel herein).
... the Law Society had a vested interest in discrediting the Plaintiff & intimidating him in future criminal proceedings against certain Alberta lawyers.
[23] Mr. Skrypichayko indicates the conduct proceedings were unfair. He alleges many procedural and evidentiary errors and anomalies occurred during his hearing. Evidence was destroyed. Witnesses lied, “... and when testifying, their lies were the subject of giggling by the Law Society Panel and by counsel for the Law Society.” LSA actors involved in this misconduct then received “year-end compensation”, rewards, and applause. The facts admitted by Mr. Skrypichayko at his hearing were obtained by coercion and intimidation.
[24] Another step allegedly taken by the LSA was having its agents unlawfully seize a large amount of material, “approximately 3000 pages of RCMP evidence”, which Mr. Skrypichayko had accumulated over ten years in preparation for a RCMP investigation of the lawyer “Mortgage Fraud Operations”. Mr. Skrypichayko explains:
When the Law Society attended the home office of the Plaintiff, the Custodian lunged at these boxes of RCMP evidence and gleefully shouted: I’ve got it!
[25] Mr. Skrypichayko indicates that this objective - covering up mortgage fraud and associated Bencher and LSA liability - was not the only reason the proceedings against him were conducted as they were. First, the LSA intended to suppress publication of Mr. Skrypichayko’s book, “Organized White Collar Crime in Canada”.
[26] Second, race, religion, and ethnic background allegedly factored into what occurred:
... The Plaintiff has been discriminated against as a Metis professional with a Ukrainian heritage and Catholic background. His attempts to protect victims of mortgage fraud in Alberta’s Aboriginal & Ukrainian communities have been ridiculed & thwarted by the Law Society.
Mr. Skrypichayko reports that the LSA mocked him for defining “integrity subjectively”, as “... a practicing Catholic with Ukrainian, French & Metis heritage ...”.
[27] Mr. Skrypichayko alleges the LSA investigation and his being disbarred led to mental health issues, physical injury, disease, loss of sleep, and considerable weight gain. He says: “[t]hese were all caused by the assaults, threats, intimidation tactics & bullying of the Law Society and its agents, employees & custodians.”
[28] He says he is unable to work, and “... has suffered extraordinary emotional & financial setbacks.” He says he has been the subject of libel and defamation by judges, Metis leaders, and prominent Ukrainian academics and community members. The LSA was behind those “cajoled” statements. Mr. Skrypichayko says his reputation has suffered irreparable and permanent harm. This, too, is motivated by attempts to cover up the Alberta lawyer mortgage fraud rings.
[29] Mr. Skrypichayko says he is due damages because his “... lucrative legal career has been destroyed.” Exemplary and punitive damages are warranted because the misconduct directed to him was deliberate. He therefore seeks (in each Action):
• $1 million general damages,
• $12 million special damages,
• $500,000 aggravated damages, and
• $1 million exemplary damages.
B. 1st Action
[30] The 1st Action applies the common narrative to only one Defendant, the LSA. Mr. Skrypichayko’s allegations are summarized above. He identifies the LSA’s misconduct in many ways, including:
1. The LSA owed Mr. Skrypichayko a duty of care, which was breached by the manner in which the LSA responded to the alleged lawyer real estate fraud, and in its role as his now former professional regulator.
2. When conducting professional regulatory steps, the LSA has a fiduciary-like duty, which it breached in relation to Mr. Skrypichayko.
3. The LSA and its agents and employees committed the tort of malfeasance in public office by its abusive and malicious treatment of Mr. Skrypichayko.
4. The LSA was negligent in its investigation of Mr. Skrypichayko’s alleged professional misconduct.
5. The LSA harmed Mr. Skrypichayko via either reckless, willfully blind, and/or politically motivated steps intended to intimidate Mr. Skrypichayko and others, conducted its investigation and disciplinary proceedings in bad faith, without authority, and in doing so caused “... an unlawful usurpation of the authority of the Courts”.
C. 2nd Action
[31] The 2nd Action includes the same common narrative and allegations as the 1st Action, but also provides specific claims against the Defendants. I will discuss the allegations against the three Defendants who currently remain in the Action.
[32] Mr. Skrypichayko says that between 2004-2007, Justice Michalyshyn was the President of the LSA. He says Justice Michalyshyn is vicariously liable for any acts of the LSA and its employees and agents, and that his “... decisions, inaction & negligence perpetuated a climate of corruption and a hostile regulatory environment ...”. He failed to respond to the “mortgage fraud rings”, and to ensure the LSA disciplinary process operated properly. This misconduct allegedly harmed Mr. Skrypichayko.
[33] Mr. MacMullen is identified “... as the banker for one particular lawyer ...” who engaged in mortgage fraud activities. The lawyer was absolved of all wrong-doing by the [LSA] without any audit, investigation, or even interview. ...”. Mr. Skrypichayko says Mr. MacMullen told him in June 2017 that the LSA would seize and destroy “Mortgage Fraud investigations” information, and that the LSA has concealed lawyer mortgage fraud activities, which “endeared” the LSA to MacMullen and other unidentified Defendants. Mr. Skrypichayko concludes:
The activities of MacMullen have contributed to & exacerbated the harm caused to the Plaintiff because they emboldened fraudulent activity & furthered the concealment thereof.
[34] Mr. Saskiw was an MLA with the Wildrose Party of Alberta. Mr. Skrypichayko indicates he supplied Mr. Saskiw with information about the “Mortgage Fraud Ring”. Mr. Saskiw then breached “... his statutory and common law duty ...” by failing to take steps such as bringing up the alleged mortgage fraud in the provincial legislature, holding meetings with the LSA, and “... failing to communicate this crisis effectively ...”.
[35] More broadly, Mr. Skrypichayko says the named individuals in the 2nd Action received “personal benefits” from the alleged lawyer mortgage fraud cover-up, however, those benefits are not identified.
[36] Even more generally, Mr. Skrypichayko alleges that the Defendants in the 2nd Action were aware of, collaborated with, and encouraged the LSA misconduct identified in the 1st Action. They are therefore liable for the LSA’s concealment of the lawyer mortgage fraud activities, how Mr. Skrypichayko’s career as a lawyer was illegally terminated, and suppression of Mr. Skrypichayko’s book about the lawyer mortgage frauds.
IV. Potential Issues with Mr. Skrypichayko’s Lawsuits
A. 1st Action
[37] The LSA takes the position that the Statement of Claim suffers the following deficiencies:
• It discloses no reasonable claim against the LSA (Rule 3.68(2)(b));
• On its face, it is frivolous, irrelevant, or improper (Rule 3.68(2)(c)); and
• It constitutes an abuse of process (Rule 3.68(2)(d)).
[38] The LSA submits that the Action is essentially an improper attempt by Mr. Skrypichayko to appeal the LSA Decision. The Legal Profession Act, RSA 2000, c L-8 (the LPA) provides the appropriate forum to appeal such a decision, specifically sections 75 and 80, which provide an appeal to the Benchers and an appeal to the Court of Appeal, respectively. As noted, the LSA advises that Mr. Skrypichayko has appealed his disbarment and that appeal is ongoing.
[39] Further, Mr. Skrypichayko makes numerous claims about an alleged “mortgage fraud ring”, which he says the LSA ignored and actually encouraged. However, the LSA notes, Mr. Skrypichayko gives no facts or particulars about such a scheme other than to say such a scheme existed. Further, Mr. Skrypichayko provides no particulars about his allegations of assault and defamation. Rule 13.7 provides that a pleading must give particulars if any of the following matters are included in pleadings: breach of trust, fraud, misrepresentation, wilful default, undue influence, and defamation.
[40] Third, the LSA argues that section 115 the LPA confers immunity to the LSA against liability for the very allegations Mr. Skrypichayko makes in the Statement of Claim.
[41] The LSA also submits that the damages claimed in the Statement of Claim are exorbitant and indicative of a vexatious claim, and raises a concern about a possible limitations issue with the Statement of Claim.
[42] Finally, the LSA notes that Mr. Skrypichayko makes many of same claims and allegations both the 1st and 2nd Actions.
[43] Based on the above, the LSA requests that the Court strike the 1st Action as an AVAP.
B. 2nd Action
i. Justice Michalyshyn
[44] Counsel for Justice Michalyshyn advises that he was President of the LSA from February 1, 2009 to February 1, 2010, and that he ceased his role as a LSA Bencher in February 2010.
[45] Counsel for Justice Michalyshyn asks that the Statement of Claim be struck out as against his client for the following reasons:
• The Statement of Claim discloses no reasonable cause of action against Justice Michalyshyn (Rule 3.68(2)(b));
• The Statement of Claim is frivolous, irrelevant, or improper, on its face (Rule 3.68(2)(c)); and
• The Statement of Claim constitutes an abuse of process (Rule 3.68(2)(d)).
[46] Counsel for Justice Michalyshyn advises that he was not involved in Mr. Skrypichayko’s disciplinary hearing; his name does not appear anywhere in the LSA Hearing Committee Report. Justice Michalyshyn ceased being a Bencher long before the disciplinary hearing took place.
[47] Counsel for Justice Michalyshyn takes the position that Mr. Skrypichayko’s claim is essentially an improper attempt to appeal the LSA Decision and that the LPA provides the appropriate mechanisms and forums of appeal. Mr. Skrypichayko has availed himself of these appeal mechanisms and the appeal is ongoing. Further, Counsel notes that section 115 of the LPA provides immunity against liability for Benchers with respect to the allegations in the Statement of Claim.
[48] Counsel submits that the Statement of Claim, on its face is frivolous, vexatious, and an abuse of process because it presupposes that the LSA ignored, and actively encouraged, a “mortgage fraud ring” without providing any facts or particulars.
[49] Finally, Counsel raises a concern about a possible limitations issue with the Statement of Claim, and notes that the Action seeks exorbitant damages of $14.5 million, which is indicative of a vexatious claim.
ii. Shayne Saskiw
[50] Counsel for Mr. Saskiw advises that in 2012 Mr. Saskiw was elected as a Member of the Legislative Assembly of Alberta (MLA) for Lac La Biche-St. Paul-Two Hills. From April 23, 2012, to May 5, 2015, Mr. Saskiw was the Justice and Solicitor General Critic and Deputy House Leader for the Wildrose Party of Alberta.
[51] Counsel for Mr. Saskiw takes the position that the Statement of Claim is an AVAP and should be dismissed as against Mr. Saskiw pursuant to Rule 3.68 of the Alberta Rules of Court because the Statement of Claim:
• Discloses no reasonable cause of action against Mr. Saskiw (Rule 3.68(2)(b));
• Is on its face frivolous, irrelevant, and/or improper (Rule 3.68(2)(c)); and,
• Constitutes an abuse of process (Rule 3.68(2)(d)).
[52] Counsel for Mr. Saskiw describes the allegations against Mr. Saskiw as arising from several meetings between Mr. Skrypichayko and Mr. Saskiw during Mr. Saskiw’s term as a MLA. Mr. Skrypichayko says that during these meetings he relayed to Mr. Saskiw his beliefs and evidence regarding a purported mortgage fraud ring which, according to Mr. Skrypichayko, operated in Alberta.
[53] Counsel notes that although the Action alleges that Mr. Saskiw was negligent, and breached his statutory and common law duties, the Action fails to indicate the source or nature of these duties of care allegedly owed to Mr. Skrypichayko.
[54] Counsel also notes that the claim for damages appears to largely arise from the fact that Mr. Skrypichayko’s legal career was derailed when he was disbarred by the LSA. Counsel notes that it is hard to see how anything Mr. Saskiw did or did not do relates to the action for damages. Mr. Saskiw has no connection to the complaints made against Mr. Skrypichayko, his disciplinary hearing, or the LSA Decision.
[55] For the period of time that Mr. Saskiw was a MLA, the Legislative Assembly Act, RSA 2000, c L-9, sections 9 and 13 confer immunity to Mr. Saskiw with respect to any of the allegations included in the Statement of Claim.
[56] Overall, Counsel for Mr. Saskiw argues that Mr. Skrypichayko has no reasonable basis to bring a claim against Mr. Saskiw, either for anything done or omitted to be done during his time as a MLA, or otherwise in his personal capacity.
[57] Counsel for Mr. Saskiw also argues that the Statement of Claim constitutes an abuse of process because it constitutes a collateral attack against the LSA Decision, seeks unwarranted and grossly disproportionate relief, includes incomprehensible allegations and arguments, and is an example of escalating proceedings and bringing proceedings for improper purposes, and includes unsubstantiated allegations of conspiracy, fraud, and misconduct.
[58] Finally, Counsel takes the position that the Statement of Claim is out of time pursuant to Limitations Act, RSA 2000 c L-12.
V. Analysis
[59] Both the 1st and 2nd Actions exhibit a number of potential issues.
A. Collateral Attack on the LSA Decision
[60] There is a general issue that underlays both of Mr. Skrypichayko’s lawsuits. Both are built around a central point: the LSA Decision was wrong. Counsel for the LSA advises that Mr. Skrypichayko has appealed the LSA Decision, pursuant to the LPA, and that appeal is ongoing.
[61] In R v Bird, 2019 SCC 7 the Supreme Court of Canada discussed the concept of, and general prohibition against, a legal proceeding which has the effect of subverting the outcome of another judicial process. This is commonly called a “collateral attack”.
[62] Bird reviewed how to address a collateral attack on “administrative orders” - in that case, an order of the Parole Board of Canada. Moldaver J observed that there must be a mechanism to ensure “... that individuals have an effective means available to them to challenge administrative orders ...”: paras 26, 29. That may be a basis for an action that results in a court order contrary to the decision of an administrative body, however this is a limited, necessity-based step, since “... permitting individuals to circumvent administrative tribunals or other appropriate forums and transfer the debate to the judicial arena could lead the courts to rule on matters they are not best suited to decide.”: para 28.
[63] Moldaver J explains at para 29, this is, ultimately, a question of legislative intent:
... in focussing on the legislature’s intention as to the appropriate forum, the Maybrun framework also stresses that individuals must have an effective means to challenge administrative orders. The Court in Maybrun noted that the rule of law requires “that the government exercises its powers within the limits prescribed by law or that appropriate remedies are available for citizens to assert their rights”, especially where penal sanctions are involved ... Accordingly, “it must . . . be presumed that the legislature did not intend to deprive citizens affected by government actions of an adequate opportunity to raise the validity of the order” ... Where there is no mechanism or forum for challenging the validity of the administrative order effectively, it must be inferred that the intention of the legislature is to permit a collateral attack ... [Emphasis added.]
[64] Where there is a right to appeal a decision of an administrative body then that means there is potentially a mechanism to challenge an administrative order: Bird at paras 32, 47-49.
[65] The LPA appears to provide a mechanism of appeal from the LSA Decision. Though the 1st and 2nd Actions do not seek to re-instate Mr. Skrypichayko as a lawyer, they nevertheless appear to be based on the same underlying question: should Mr. Skrypichayko be disbarred? This is precisely the question that will be before the body that hears Mr. Skrypichayko’s appeal, pursuant to the LPA.
[66] There are also duplicate elements in the details of what was argued during the LSA disciplinary process, and in the 1st and 2nd Actions. For example:
1. During the LSA disciplinary proceedings, Mr. Skrypichayko argued that inordinate delay meant the LSA proceedings were unfair and should be terminated: LSA Decision at paras 9-76. This same complaint is found in the 1st and 2nd Actions, though now Mr. Skrypichayko also says this delay was an intentional institutional strategy.
2. Mr. Skrypichayko initially agreed to a Statement of Admitted Facts. At the LSA hearing, Mr. Skrypichayko then appeared to withdraw from the agreement, and later agreed to a revised Statement of Admitted Facts: LSA Decision at paras 68-73. In the Actions, Mr. Skrypichayko alleges the Admitted Facts were extracted illegally and by coercion.
3. The LSA Decision evaluated and rejected Mr. Skrypichayko’s claims that the Custodian had engaged in misconduct, including dumping boxes of Mr. Skrypichayko’s files off a truck: LSA Decision para 64.
[67] This is the first apparent and general issue with both the 1st and 2nd Actions. Mr. Skrypichayko has already pursued the questions of the correctness and fairness of the LSA Decision by means of the ongoing appeal. The 1st and 2nd Actions appear to be an attempt to re-open issues determined by the LSA Decision, which are currently on appeal, and seek relief on bases and questions which are incompatible with the LSA Decision: Unrau v National Dental Examining Board, 2019 ABQB 283 at paras 613-614 (Unrau #2).
[68] The 1st and 2nd Actions therefore appear to be collateral attacks on the LSA Decision, and, if so, are an abuse of court processes: Unrau #2 at paras 616-617.
B. Hopeless Proceedings
[69] The second general issue with both the 1st and 2nd Actions is that they appear to be hopeless proceedings.
i. Lack of Particulars
[70] A large issue appears to run through both of Mr. Skrypichayko’s Actions. While they are lengthy documents, much of what is alleged takes the form of open-ended “bald” statements. For example, paragraph 50 of the 2nd Action says: “The Plaintiff and his family have been assaulted, intimidated and threatened.” This claim lacks information on who, what, where, when, why, and how.
[71] A proceeding is hopeless and an abuse of court processes when pleadings do not appear to provide a basis for the Defendants and Court to make a meaningful response:
Inadequate pleadings are an indicium of abusive litigation. This Court has adopted the reasoning in [kisikawpimootewin v Canada, 2004 FC 1426, 134 ACWS (3d) 396], at paras 8-9, that litigation is an abuse of court processes when a “... defendant cannot know how to answer, and a court will be unable to regulate the proceedings ...”, “bare assertions and bald statements” leave the defendant “... both embarrassed and unable to defend itself ...”, and the court is unable to identify the intended argument and/or specific material facts. As Gill J observed in Arabi v Alberta, 2014 ABQB 295 at paras 85-86, 589 AR 249, there is no need for a court or responding litigant to answer claims that are “gibberish”, which “simply make no sense”, or which are “illogical, impenetrable claims”.
(Unrau #2 at para 629)
[72] This possible issue permeates both Actions. Mr. Skrypichayko’s litigation centers on a “$700 million series of Mortgage Fraud Rings operated by lawyers in Alberta.” Mr. Skrypichayko says he had information and techniques that would have addressed such a scheme. But just what the “Mortgage Fraud Rings” were, or are, is not apparently explained. Mr. Skrypichayko does not appear to provide a basis for the Defendants to know what it was that they allegedly covered-up, despite the fact that Mr. Skrypichayko says he has extensive documentation of the matter.
[73] There are many specific instances of this issue. A very incomplete but representative set of examples is:
1. The allegations against Mr. MacMullen appear to be bald allegations, and do not identify how Mr. MacMullen in any way injured Mr. Skrypichayko.
2. No basis for injury to Mr. Skrypichayko is pled in relation to Mr. Saskiw.
3. Mr. Skrypichayko’s allegations of discrimination based on his ethnic background and religion provide no details, except that certain prominent persons in Mr. Skrypichayko’s communities (not named) were pressured into making negative comments (not described or identified) about Mr. Skrypichayko.
4. Many allegations of intimidation and assault are made, often without naming involved persons, or the acts that occurred. Even when some detail is provided, there still does not appear to be sufficient information to permit a meaningful response. For example, para 74 of the 2nd Action says:
The aforementioned harassment of the Plaintiff started as early as 1997 when the Custodian of the Law Society assaulted the Plaintiff in the courthouse in Edmonton. The Plaintiff had just defeated him in a shadowy financial transaction and the Custodian was enraged. He attacked the Plaintiff in the hallway.
I also note this claim has no relation to the named parties in the 2nd Action.
[74] A related point is that on a Rule 3.68 procedure, pled facts are presumed to be true: R v Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd, 2011 SCC 42 at para 17. However, this presumption is not unlimited. As Gill J observed in Arabi v Alberta, 2014 ABQB 295 at paras 74-78, an action cannot rely on allegations that are absurd, highly implausible, or hyperbole. This is particularly true when no detail is offered on the nature of an underlying misconduct and its operation. Similarly, Manderscheid J in VWW v Wasylyshen, 2013 ABQB 327 at para 52, leave refused 2014 ABCA 121, observed “[a]n extraordinary claim requires extraordinary proof.”
[75] Some of Mr. Skrypichayko’s allegations may fall into the category of extraordinary claims. For example, he says he was subjected to repeated abuse, assault, and intimidation by LSA employees and agents. Many allegations are not specific. Other allegations are implausible, for example the complaint that Maurice Dumont repeatedly intimidated Mr. Skrypichayko at the Metro Billiards restaurant. More is needed to substantiate claims such as this.
[76] This is a second basis on which I conclude the 1st and 2nd Actions may be abusive proceedings, since they do not provide an adequate basis for the Court and the Defendants to respond.
ii. Impossible, Excessive, or Unwarranted Remedies
[77] When a lawsuit seeks impossible, moot, disproportionate, or excessive claims that is a basis to conclude that action is an abuse of court processes: Unrau #2 at paras 623-625. Both of Mr. Skrypichayko’s Actions seek identical damages, totalling $14.5 million.
[78] The maximum general damages that is permitted at law was “capped” by Andrews v Grand & Toy Alberta Ltd, 1978 CanLII 1 (SCC), [1978] 2 SCR 229 (Andrews) at $100,000. That maximum award is appropriate for persons who suffer near total function loss and/or have other severe effects on cognition, sensation, or ongoing pain. Mr. Skrypichayko alleges he has suffered from mental health issues, including severe depression, shingles, “extreme muscle tension & damage”, and weight gain.
[79] First, Mr. Skrypichayko’s $1 million general damages claim is almost three times the Andrews cap (adjusted for inflation). Second, it is extremely unlikely that the injuries described by Mr. Skrypichayko would warrant the cap amount, which is reserved for extreme negative outcomes. Third, by claiming the same amount in general damages in both lawsuits for the same alleged injury, pain, and suffering, Mr. Skrypichayko appears to be attempting to obtain double recovery.
[80] Mr. Skrypichayko’s $12 million claim appears to relate to lost income from being disbarred. If this claim is indeed based on that alleged injury, and the 1st and 2nd Actions are a collateral attack on the LSA Decision, then Mr. Skrypichayko is precluded from recovering damages for being disbarred, since that was a lawful step.
[81] $12 million is a large sum for lost income. No facts are pled concerning Mr. Skrypichayko’s income from his business, aside that it was “lucrative”. I therefore conclude that the $12 million special damages claim may be excessive, and, if not, then the 1st and 2nd Actions do not plead facts to support that quantum.
iii. Statutory Immunity
[82] The Defendants raise several aspects of statutory immunity that may apply to these matters.
[83] Section 115 of the LPA provides immunity to the LSA and its officers, employees, and Benchers, among others, when they are acting pursuant to the LPA. Given this section, it is difficult to see how the Actions disclose reasonable causes of action against the LSA, of any of its officers, employees, committees, or LSA Benchers, such as Justice Michalyshyn.
[84] Section 115 reads:
Protection from liability
115(1) No action lies against
(a) the Society or a person who is or was an officer, employee or agent of the Society,
(b) a person who conducted an investigation under Part 3,
(c) a person who is or was a Bencher or a member of a committee established by or under this Act,
(d) a person who is or was a custodian appointed under Part 4,
(e) a subsidiary corporation of the Society referred to in section 99(2)(b) or a person who is or was a director, officer or employee of that corporation, or
(f) a person who acted on the instructions of, or under the supervision of, a person referred to in clauses (a) to (e),
in respect of anything done by any of them in good faith pursuant to this Act, the rules or any direction of the Benchers.
(2) No action for defamation may be founded on a communication regarding the conduct of a member or student‑at‑law if the communication is published to or by a person within any of the classes of person enumerated in subsection (1), in good faith and in the course of any proceedings under this Act or the rules relating to that conduct.
(3) Subsections (1) and (2) do not operate to restrict or abrogate any immunity or protection that is otherwise provided by law to a person within any of the classes of person enumerated in subsection (1) or to any other person.
(4) Notwithstanding any other Act or law, no person who is or was within any of the classes of person enumerated in subsection (1) shall be required in any proceedings, other than proceedings under this Act or the rules or a prosecution under this Part, to give evidence relating to any matter that arose in any proceedings under this Act or the rules, or to produce any record or thing adduced in evidence in proceedings under this Act or the rules or forming part of the records of the Society that relate to the conduct of a member or student‑at‑law.
[85] As well, the Legislative Assembly Act, sections 9 and 13 appear to confer immunity to Mr. Saskiw with respect to the allegations against him in the 2nd Action. These sections read as follows:
Privileges, immunities and powers generally
9(1) In addition to the privileges, immunities and powers respectively conferred on them by this Act, the Assembly and its Members, and the committees of the Assembly and their members, have the same privileges, immunities and powers as those held respectively by the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, the members of that House, the committees of that House and the members of committees of that House at the time of the passing of the Constitution Act, 1867.
(2) The privileges, immunities and powers referred to in subsection (1)
(a) are part of the public and general law of Alberta,
(b) need not be pleaded, and
(c) shall be judicially noticed in all courts in Alberta.
... ...
Members’ immunities
13(1) A Member is not liable to any civil action or prosecution, arrest, imprisonment or damages by reason of any matter or thing brought by the Member before the Assembly or any committee of the Assembly by petition, Bill, resolution, motion or otherwise or by reason of anything said by the Member in the Assembly or any committee of the Assembly.
(2) A Member is not liable, except by reason of an order under section 11(1), to arrest or detention for any cause that is civil in nature and within the legislative jurisdiction of the Legislature.
[86] Among the other problems identified with the claim against Mr. Saskiw, it appears he may able to rely on statutory immunity.
C. Escalating and Expanding Proceedings
[87] A hallmark of abusive litigation is a pattern that the dispute grows over time:
1. “grounds and issues tend to roll forward into subsequent actions, repeated and supplemented”,
2. actions have an “accumulative” nature, adding new parties, issues, and remedies, and
3. new disputes and litigation “hive off” the original conflict.
(Unrau #2 at para 633)
[88] The 2nd Action appears to be a proceeding accumulating and escalating off the initial 1st Action. It adds a variety of players to the same core allegations made in the 1st Action. As noted, the connection of these new parties to the “core” allegations against the LSA is limited, or even apparently non-existent.
[89] If Mr. Skrypichayko’s lawsuits are exhibiting an escalating and expanding proceedings pattern, then that is a strong basis for court intervention, particularly in relation to the “peripheral litigation”: Unrau #2 at paras 641-645.
D. Unjustified Belief
[90] A further possible issue with the 1st and 2nd Actions is that they appear to potentially be the product of an unwarranted and unjustified belief. This may take the form of scandalous and inflammatory pleadings, unsubstantiated allegations of conspiracy, fraud, and other misconduct, and claims of intimidation, harassment, and racial bias: Unrau #2 at para 714.
[91] In Unrau #2, I described how this may result when an abusive litigant:
... is so certain of his or her cause that the abusive litigant refuses to accept failure, and instead:
a) displaces blame to purportedly corrupt decision-makers, politicians, government officials, judges, lawyers, police, etc., and
b) constructs imaginary conspiracies, biases, and other schemes to shift the blame for failure from the litigant to somebody else.
[92] Since I have described Mr. Skrypichayko’s litigation in some detail, I do not believe it is necessary to go further and provide specific examples of how the 1st and 2nd Actions describe a broad-based but unsubstantiated conspiracy against Mr. Skrypichayko, and the resulting persecution and related misconduct. This is a further separate basis on which I conclude Mr. Skrypichayko’s 1st and 2nd Actions may be abusive proceedings.
VI. Conclusion
[93] The 1st and 2nd Actions appear to be suitable AVAP candidates for review pursuant to CPN7. The Court seeks a response from Mr. Skrypichayko on the following questions:
1. How are the 1st and 2nd Actions not collateral attacks on, and an attempt to appeal, the LSA Decision?
2. How do the 1st and 2nd Actions provide adequate alleged facts to allow the Defendants and the Court to make a meaningful response?
3. How do the 1st and 2nd Actions provide a reasonable cause of action that is not subject to statutory immunity?
4. How do the 1st and 2nd Actions not seek impossible, duplicative, or disproportionate remedies?
5. How is the 2nd Action not an escalating and expanding proceeding?
6. How are the 1st and 2nd Actions not proceedings with an improper purpose for attempting to assert claims that are not related to Mr. Skrypichayko’s personal rights?
7. How are the 1st and 2nd Actions not proceedings based on an unjustified belief, in this instance an alleged claim of a broad-based conspiracy of government, police, and LSA authorities to suppress knowledge and response to illegal and fraudulent lawyer conduct?
[94] Since I have concluded that the 1st and 2nd Actions warrant review pursuant to CPN7, these Actions are stayed until further notice.
[95] CPN7 now advances to its second step. This step consists entirely of written submissions; there will be no Court appearances or oral arguments:
1. Mr. Skrypichayko has 14 days after this decision is filed and served to prepare a Written Submission of no more than a total of 20 pages, to be filed and served, pursuant to para 3(b) of CPN7. The Written Submission must be clearly addressed “To the Attention of Associate Chief Justice J.D. Rooke”;
2. If no Written Submission is received by the Court by that deadline the Court will make its final decision on whether the 1st and/or 2nd Actions should be struck out in whole or in part, pursuant to Rule 3.68 of the Alberta Rules of Court (CPN7, para 3(c));
3. If Mr. Skrypichayko provides and serves a Written Submission, then the Defendants have seven days to provide a Written Reply of up to a total of 10 pages in length (CPN7, para 3(d)). The Written Reply must be clearly addressed “To the Attention of Associate Chief Justice J.D. Rooke”; and
4. After the Court receives Mr. Skrypichayko’s Written Submission and the Defendants’ Written Replies, if any, the Court will make its final decision on whether the 1st and/or 2nd Action should be struck out in whole or in part, pursuant to Rule 3.68 of the Alberta Rules of Court (CPN7, para 3(e)).
[96] I note that I have varied the usual CPN7 procedure to provide Mr. Skrypichayko the opportunity to make a Written Submission of 20 pages rather than the usual 10 pages. I have taken this step because this decision relates to two actions, rather than one action.
[97] The Court will prepare and serve the interim orders staying the 1st and 2nd Actions. Mr. Skrypichayko’s approval of those Orders is not required, pursuant to Rule 9.4(2)(c) of the Alberta Rules of Court.
Dated at the City of Edmonton, Alberta this 12th day of August, 2020.
|
|
J.D. Rooke A.C.J.C.Q.B.A. |
Appearances:
None
Written Representations:
Joe D. Spelliscy, Duncan Craig LLP
For Law Society of Alberta and
Justice Peter Michalyshyn
Ed Picard, Alberta Counsel
For Shayne Saskiw
https://www.facebook.com/donate/194381498465169/?paipv=0&eav=AfYU--n5kBZwgqe_YtX23PWgqnXL3ORpEuLctJb2z5ShPeIVaDkgeNREXoGB6PITo2Q&_rdr
Fundraiser ended
About
Redacted for Public Distribution Page 1 of 6
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION TO DISMISS AN APPEAL UNDER
SECTION 75 AND 76(11) OF THE
LEGAL PROFESSION ACT, RSA 2000, c. L-8
IN THE MATTER OF DAVID SKRYPICHAYKO
A MEMBER OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA
Special Meeting of the Benchers
Bud Melnyk, QC – Chair
Sony Ahluwalia – Bencher
Bill Hendsbee, QC – Bencher
Jim Lutz, QC – Bencher
Moira Váně – Bencher
Grant Vogeli, QC – Bencher
Louise Wasylenko – Lay Bencher
Hearing Date
February 1, 2022
Hearing Location
Virtual Hearing
DECISION OF THE BENCHERS PURSUANT TO SECTION 76(11)
Overview
1. A special meeting of the Benchers (the “Panel”) was held by video conference on
February 1, 2022 pursuant to section 75 and 76(11) of the Legal Profession Act (“Act”) to
consider an application by the Law Society of Alberta (“LSA”) seeking to Dismiss the
Appeal in the matter of David Skrypichayko arising from the Appeal made on June 9,
2017.
2. As a special meeting of the Benchers, the President confirmed that this would be a
written application, without oral submissions.
3. Mr. Shane Sackman appeared as counsel for the LSA. Mr. Skrypichayko did not attend
this special meeting.
Preliminary Matters
4. The jurisdiction of the Panel was established by Exhibits 1 through 4, consisting of the
letter of appointment of the Panel, the Notice to Attend to the Former Member, the
Certificate of Status of the Former Member with the LSA and the Letter of Exercise of
Discretion. No objections were raised regarding the constitution of the Panel.
Redacted for Public Distribution Page 2 of 6
5. The LSA did not receive any request for a private hearing. Accordingly, the Panel
directed that the hearing be held in public.
6. At the outset of the hearing Exhibits 1 through 12 were entered into evidence in the
hearing.
Service
7. LSA counsel sought an order validating service pursuant to section 4 of the Rules of the
LSA (Rules). The following particulars were evidenced regarding service of this hearing
on Mr. Skrypichayko:
(a) Service of this application was sent by email to Mr. Skrypichayko on October 26,
2021.
(b) The email address that was used had been in use for a number of years and delivery
notices were evidenced without any indication that the email address was either not
in service or otherwise not receipted.
(c) Thereafter Mr. Skrypichayko did contact the LSA on November 24, 2021 about
arranging for personal service of this application. However, Mr. Skrypichayko would
not provide a current mailing address.
(d) An LSA investigator attended at the last known address for Mr. Skrypichayko on
December 16, 2021, but the house appeared to be uninhabitable due to significant
fire damage. Despite numerous attempts thereafter by the LSA investigator via
email, text and Twitter to contact Mr. Skrypichayko, there was no response.
8. Section 114 of the Act states in part:
114 If any provision of this Act or the rules requires or authorizes the serving,
giving or furnishing of a notice or other document on or to any person, the notice or
other document is sufficiently served, given or furnished
(a) if it is served personally on that person,
(b) if it is delivered in accordance with the rules at (i) the official address for
service of that person according to the records of the Society, in the case of
a member or student-at-law, or (ii) the last known address of that person
according to the records of the Society, in any other case, or
[…]
9. Section 4 of the Rules deals with service:
Redacted for Public Distribution Page 3 of 6
4 (1) Where a notice or other document is to be served, given or furnished
pursuant to a provision of these Rules by a delivery under section 114(b) of the
Act, the notice or other document may be delivered by a Bencher or an officer or
employee of the Society, or any person engaged for the purposes by, or acting at
the request of, a committee, a Bencher or an officer or employee of the Society, by
(a) registered mail,
(b) courier, or
(c) mail, other than registered or certified.
(2) In addition to the delivery methods in (1), delivery may be by (a) fax, or (b)
email to a member or student-at-law, and to any other person where that person
explicitly or implicitly authorizes the Law Society to use that form of communication
and has provided the required contact information for that purpose until that person
advises the Law Society that the contact information is no longer valid or
authorization is withdrawn.
10. It is the finding of this Panel that the email service on October 26, 2021 was effected in
compliance with section 114 of the Act and section 4 of the Rules. Accordingly, service
of this application is validated and deemed good service.
The Authority of the Benchers to Dismiss an Appeal
11. The Act provides a procedure for a member or the LSA to seek for the Benchers to
Dismiss an Appeal, pursuant to section 76(11) of the Act, which states:
76(11) The Benchers may make an order dismissing the appeal, with or without a
further order requiring the member to pay to the Society all or part of the costs of
proceedings relating to the appeal, if
[…]
(c) the Benchers are satisfied that the member has otherwise abandoned the
appeal.
History of Proceedings
12. The history of this matter can be summarized as follows:
(a) March 18, 2016 a Hearing Committee disbarred Mr. Skrypichayko and a written
decision was rendered May 11, 2017.
(b) Mr. Skrypichayko appealed that decision in June 2017.
(c) In June 2017 Mr. Skrypichayko was informed of the estimated cost of $9,540.76 to
prepare the hearing record, which costs have never been paid.
Redacted for Public Distribution Page 4 of 6
(d) On October 9, 2019 the LSA provided notice to Mr. Skrypichayko of Rule 100.3 as
required by Rule 100.3(4).
(e) In response to this notice Mr. Skrypichayko applied to a panel of Benchers seeking a
waiver of these costs.
(f) On March 4 and April 7, 2020 the LSA wrote to Mr. Skrypichayko advising him that
the cost of preparing the hearing record had been reduced to $1,995.00. This revised
amount has never been paid.
(g) The waiver application was heard on October 8, 2020 by a panel of Benchers and
they rendered a decision on October 26, 2020. The decision states in part:
13. Mr. Skrypichayko has failed to satisfy the Panel of the articulated factors
and accordingly the Panel is not prepared to grant the application to
have the costs of the appeal record waived.
14. While we have declined to exercise our discretion under section 74(6) of
the Act, the Panel recognizes that the factors and information that would
be relevant to a proper consideration of Mr. Skrypichayko’s application
were not known or provided to him at the relevant time. Accordingly, Mr.
Skrypichayko will have 30 days from his receipt of our written decision to
perfect his application. If Mr. Skrypichayko should provide such further
evidence within this time period this Panel is prepared to reconsider his
application anew.
(h) Mr. Skrypichayko has made no further application for a waiver within the 30 days and
the costs of preparing the hearing record have never been paid.
Appeal Dismissal Decision
13. The Panel has considered the Section 76(11) Appeal Dismissal Guideline, dated
September 26, 2019, and that Guideline states in part:
35. If the lawyer fails to comply with any obligation in Rule 100.2 or Rule
100.3, as the case may be, the Law Society may bring an application to the
Benchers for an order dismissing the lawyer’s appeal as otherwise abandoned in
accordance with section 76(11).
36. If the Benchers determine that the lawyer has failed to comply with any
requirements in Rule 100.2 or Rule 100.3, they may make an order under Rule
100.4 dismissing the lawyer’s appeal as otherwise abandoned pursuant to section
76(11)(c).
Redacted for Public Distribution Page 5 of 6
14. Also considered by the Panel were Rules 100.3 and 100.4, which state in part:
100.3(1) This rule applies to appeals commenced prior to September 27, 2019,
pursuant to section 75 of the Act, where the member has not done one or more of
the following:
(a) paid the cost of preparing the hearing record;
(b) provided written appeal submissions to Society counsel;
(c) complied with directions imposed on the member by the chair of a pre-
hearing conference; or
(d) complied with requirements imposed on the member by the Benchers.
[…]
100.4 If the member fails to comply with any of the member’s requirements in Rule
100.2 or in Rule 100.3, as the case may be, the Benchers may, on application by
the Society, make an order dismissing a member’s appeal as otherwise abandoned
pursuant to section 76(11)(c) of the Act.
15. The Panel is satisfied that Mr. Skrypichayko has effectively abandoned his Appeal for
the following reasons:
(a) Mr. Skrypichayko has failed to comply with the requirements of Rule 100.3(1)(a) in
that he has not paid the cost of preparing the hearing record. That payment was due
at least by November 8, 2020, some fourteen plus months ago.
(b) On October 8, 2019 Mr. Skrypichayko was advised of an amendment to the Rules,
where he was advised that he was required to pay the costs of the hearing record or
apply for a waiver. That letter also stated that the LSA could apply to have the
Appeal dismissed due to it being abandoned. It was only after receiving this notice,
which was some two plus years after the Appeal was filed, that Mr. Skrypichayko
took steps for a waiver application.
(c) Mr. Skrypichayko failed to submit further information to the panel of Benchers
regarding his waiver application despite being given an opportunity to renew his
waiver application by the panel of Benchers on October 26, 2020.
(d) Mr. Skrypichayko has taken no further steps in his Appeal since the motion seeking a
waiver of costs on October 8, 2020.
(e) The May 11, 2017 Hearing Committee decision was rendered almost five years ago,
which is an unreasonable delay.
Redacted for Public Distribution Page 6 of 6
(f) Aside from the waiver application, Mr. Skrypichayko has taken no other active steps
in pursing his Appeal and his actions are suggestive of unwarranted and deliberate
delay.
Conclusion
16. The Appeal filed by Mr. Skrypichayko on June 9, 2019 is accordingly dismissed.
17. Mr. Skrypichayko is ordered to pay costs of the Appeal proceedings in the amount of
$4,504.34.
Dated at Calgary, Alberta, March 1, 2022.
_______________________________
Bud Melnyk, QC – Chair
_______________________________
Sony Ahluwalia
_______________________________
Bill Hendsbee, QC
_______________________________
Jim Lutz, QC
_______________________________
Moira Váně
_______________________________
Grant Vogeli, QC
_____________________
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 7:04 PM
Subject: YO Vincent Gircys Do you understand me now?
To: <Vincent.gircys@gmail.com>, <prontoman1@protonmail.com>, <senseirude@hotmail.com>, <newsnotnoise@protonmail.com>, <Chidakash@protonmail.com>, <paulajtucci@gmail.com>, <Tom@icareinsurance.ca>, <educatorsforhumanrights@protonmail.com>, <nancyobee@protonmail.com>, <vickie@vaccinechoicecanada.com>, <gisele@vaccinechoicecanada.com>, <tino@lcddash.com>, <anyakreynes@gmail.com>, <Shirley.guertin@protonmail.com>, <alanbrough@prontonmail.com>, <sciencej@protonmail.com>, <dione@librti.com>, <roman@librti.com>, <drpierremilot@protonmail.com>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, Marco.Mendicino <Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, fin.minfinance-financemin.fin <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, pierre.poilievre <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, Katie.Telford <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, kingpatrick278 <kingpatrick278@gmail.com>, Michael.Duheme <Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, <Denis.Beaudoin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, <ngroot@investigationcounsel.com>, <tim.wilbur@keymedia.com>, <bkofman@ksvadvisory.com>, <info@nationalcitizensinquiry.ca>, jcarpay <jcarpay@jccf.ca>, jagmeet.singh <jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, <media.medias@fintrac-canafe.gc.ca>, blaine.higgs <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, <jcooper@torontolegalresearch.com>, <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, <czwibel@ccla.org>, <contact@fedsforfreedom.ca>, ian <ian@mccuaiglaw.ca>, <mjackson@fieldlaw.com>, freedomreport.ca <freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>, <chris.scott@whistlestoptruckstop.ca>, sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, stefanos.karatopis <stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com>, Lametti, David - M.P. <David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, <waynenarvey@hotmail.com>, <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>
Cc: <LGrey@gwsllp.ca>, <info@lawyers4truth.ca>, <brianpeckford@gmail.com>, <ted@vaccinechoicecanada.com>, <alanjm@idirect.com>, <benitapedersen@hotmail.com>, <KMartin@postmedia.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Vincent G <vincent.gircys@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 16:25:55 -0600
Subject: Re: Fw: JCCF Portion of our current contract and This
Retainer will not be changed unless both the Lawyer and I agree to the
changes, and sign the new or altered Retainer.
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Cc: prontoman1@protonmail.com, waynenarvey@hotmail.com
Hello David,
I have no idea why you're sending me extensive emails relating to people
and situations I'm not involved with with no explanation or reference.
I currently have my hands full by working on matters that can make an
appreciable beneficial difference to Canadians in bringing about
accountability.
I suggest you try the appropriate social introduction to whomever your
trying to correspond with. Introduce yourself including the purpose of
contact and explain in short summary the concern you have and why your
contact might be interested including a request to delve in further
details.
As someone who gets extensive Web mail, I just can't process it all in
short order. If I tried I would be so far behind in workload I wouldn't be
able to get anything accomplished.
I hope you understand as this also applies to whoever else you may be
contacting of which some choose to proceed to use the block option.
Respectfully
Vincent Gircys
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024, 11:01 AM David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 04:00:06 +0000
> Subject: Fw: JCCF Portion of our current contract and This Retainer
> will not be changed unless both the Lawyer and I agree to the changes,
> and sign the new or altered Retainer.
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
>
>
>
> ______________________________
> From: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>
> Sent: January 29, 2024 9:59 PM
> To: Monick Grenier <monick@grenierlaw.ca>
> Subject: JCCF Portion of our current contract and This Retainer will
> not be changed unless both the Lawyer and I agree to the changes, and
> sign the new or altered Retainer.
>
> Hello Monick
>
> I have unanswered questions about our current retainer. I have
> "demanded" nothing. I have asked you complete your work before
> "finalization" and with several unanswered questions as your client.
> I do not have time to finish the draft of all these questions and
> requests I guess, and is of no interest now as you now have indicated
> quite abruptly and rudely.
>
> Let me make this very clear my friend. This is nothing personal.
> I have not released JCCF of their commitment and have disputed that
> JCCF has honoured their part of our current retainer.
> The excuses that were given is "they could not afford to pay private
> lawyers" and they offered an "inhouse lawyer". No other reasons given.
> This was not the case though as it was a brand-new law firm with zero
> experience as such under the licence, they operate. This made me
> question the communications the day you notified me that JCCF wants to
> change their agreement.
> I immediately tried to contact JCCF through several means and they
> would not respond. You know who did respond to me with conformation
> that JCCF will no longer help me?
> Chris Barber in writing to me. How did he even know? He described
> intimate details like them offering a new lawyer in writing to me.
> This is when I emailed you back to question these things and was met
> by a "is already done" attitude. So I had the retainer reviewed by a
> lawyer friend I have and I was advised to proceed cautiously. So I
> did.
> I reminded you of the contract in place , and specifically pointed out,
>
> 9. I understand that my matter is confidential, and that no
> information will be released to the Justice Centre except as provided
> in this Retainer.
> 10. I understand that the Lawyer’s obligations are to me, if a dispute
> arises between me and the Justice Centre.
> 11. I understand and consent that this legal payment arrangement has
> been provided to the Justice Centre.
> 12. I understand and consent that the Lawyer will provide me and the
> Justice Centre with a copy of each account due on this matter and that
> the Justice Centre will pay the said account on my behalf as well as a
> copy of this Retainer
> 13. As a condition of the Justice Centre paying my legal fees for this
> matter:
> (a) I agree to assert my constitutional and other legal rights;
> (d) I consent to the Lawyer utilizing, in regard to this matter, the
> services of other lawyers, paralegals, IT personnel and the
> communication team who work with the Justice Centre, and I consent to
> the disclosure of information related to this matter to these persons
> to the extent deemed appropriate by the Lawyer;
> (f) I agree to fully cooperate with the media and communications
> strategies approved by the Lawyer and implemented by the Justice
> Centre to publicize my matter;
> 14. If the Justice Centre does not pay the legal fee4s, I understand
> that I will be responsible to pay the legal fees.
> 17. I hereby authorize the Lawyer to discuss all aspects of this
> matter with the Justice Centre’s officers, directors, employees and
> network of volunteer legal service providers for the purpose of
> advancing the matter. Such communications shall not constitute a
> waiver of solicitor-client or litigation privilege.
> 25. I understand that this Retainer represents the whole Retainer
> between me and the Lawyer in regards to the matter.
> This Retainer will not be changed unless both the Lawyer and I agree
> to the changes, and sign the new or altered Retainer. This Retainer
> may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be
> an original, but all of which together shall constitute one
> instrument. This Retainer may be executed by facsimile or PDF
> signature(s).
> 26. The laws of the Province of Ontario shall govern this Retainer.
> 27. I understand, the Lawyer is happy to answer any questions I may have.
> I may wish to have this retainer agreement reviewed by another lawyer.
> (Of which was done before I entered)
>
> I have already instructed you many times that our retainer is current
> and incomplete.
> When JCCF and John Carpay did not respond to my communications I
> secured a flight to Calgary and was going to walk in the front door of
> their head office. When they found out I was on the ground in Calgary
> I finally get a communication from their representative and he takes
> me for a lunch to explain. I did not let them out of the contract as
> they were still using my face several places online with a donate
> button even to this day 1/29/2024.
> POSTED ON: AUGUST 11, 2022
> COVID-19-NEWS-RELEASESNEWS RELEASES
> Count Days
> 536 days of advertising
> August 11, 2022 - January 29, 2024 (Page 1 missing in finalization of
> billing that shows the total paid by JCCF)
>
> https://www.jccf.ca/peace-man-
> 536 * aprox $3033.22 = $5.68 per day. I know from admissions and
> testimony that many specifically donated for my cause at JCCF within
> the first 100 days.
> And even recently.
>
> I did however agree for a consultation from this new proposed lawyer
> and firm to show my cooperation with their offer. After the
> consultation they sent me a new retainer to review. I did and also had
> it reviewed. It was NOT in my best interest to enter or even entertain
> that retainer. I informed YOU of this.
> I was never going to respond to that lawyer or firm again. A week
> later he contacted me and said he was NOT a representative of JCCF,
> when just two emails before he said he was.
> He was unethical in a very pointed and out right lie.
> You are cc'ed in that email.
> I could not take this lawyer they "offered". WE did not agree and did
> not enter into a new retainer and ours explicitly states the one we
> have is still in effect to this day 01/29/2024
> I informed you several times that the https://LSO.ca and
> https://lawsociety.mb.ca/ Had been contacted. Kings bench also
> contacted due to the seriousness beyond provincial borders on several
> lawyers under the banner of JCCF.
> I informed you of your professional standards even while asking me to
> pay an amount of $10,000.
> I informed you of my faith in you and trust you will do your job "to
> the best of your abilities" and told you I do not wish for another
> lawyer and give the courts any excuse to delay.
> I refused all "deals" and again informed you I would not plead guilty
> to any wrongdoing. I asked you to put in a late disclosure
> application. I asked to review any material you were going to share
> with the courts after you did not let me review the Charter
> Application.
> After shadowing up and ready on Jan 22 and making myself available for
> two hours before the 10"00 am scheduled time there was no Judge and no
> written explanation from the courts to me as to why. I asked for this.
> I questioned why my lawyer would not question this before first
> adjournment on that day.
> I waited until 2 pm and again no Judge and adjourned to Jan 23 10"00 am.
> Again I was ready and no Judge and not questioned on record.
> A colleague of mine contacted you in advocation asking you to review
> something before returning to court. David Amos.
> He was met with dismissal. You never asked or contacted me to ask if
> this was in fact a colleague or friend.
> This is quite important as you say that the Charter Application
> Challenge was a key factor in the decision.
> There were other key factors. David contacted many people over several
> months and waited for responses. He never contacted me and did his
> entire investigation from my online presence and seen what I was on
> too for the security of Canada. In those communications you can find
> all here at this link below.
> There was no Judge because there were none that would take the seat
> after these communications is an avenue we are exploring with the
> courts through the transcripts and communications. The EMA being
> deemed illegal had zero baring on my case. We both know the courts
> seen how serious I was and did not want this case to be heard.
> They know of the investigation I have been on. Despite me eluding to
> it many times to you, you have yet to question or try and understand
> the magnitude.
>
> On Jan 23 2024 I brought a witness to court from NCI. She also
> witnessed our communications outside the court room.
> What had NCI interested is they have representatives that have
> attended almost all cases regarding the protests and invocation of the
> Mandates and EMA in their own investigation.
> The representative that showed has never seen a case where a planned
> trial and no judge available.
> You are on the legal defence for Tamara and Chris Barber. We had to
> have many discussions about your client sabotaging my fundraising in
> more than one spot. None of them actually done by me but good
> Canadians that wanted to support me. You still allowed for it to
> happen and it hurt me. I told you, I do not wish you any harm. But you
> allowed harm and now asking me for payment.
> After my case was withdrawn I spent two days finally disclosing my
> investigation to NCI with hundreds of documents and, video, and
> testimony on how the protest of 2022 was infiltrated and the public
> defrauded and deceived.
> Plainly. On Feb 7th 2022 a Corporation was formed that placed demands
> on a five eyes country. If the Government would have even responded
> then a precedent would be set. Therefore the citizen led movement and
> their voices were stollen and premeditated. There were and are, far
> more than me working on this and there will be many more to testify in
> accordance to this.
> The money donated was always to be subverted and never to reach the
> intended recipients. and much more.
> The conspiracy charges will be investigated in a new way now. The
> Police have all the evidence that Freedom Corp and 53 other
> influencers and members of MSM in Canada were aware that lawyers for
> JCCF facilitated a media and propaganda control room for clients with
> court conditions and against those conditions. The Police notified and
> given evidence (Blonde) withheld this evidence even while under oath
> in his testimony before the courts. Has still yet to inform or share
> this evidence to date.
>
> Want to share that I am well aware that JCCF has paid a "private
> lawyer", yourself, just as recent as the date you want to abruptly end
> our contract with a quick finalization.
> Page 1 of the 2024-01-27 MELFI ACCOUNT 1414 PDF is missing. (incomplete
> work)
> I wish to have a detailed full account of the payments for your
> services from the start of our retainer to todays date. I told you we
> will be sending the bill to JCCF first and if they refuse to pay then
> the next step is to pay it with the trust in place when I hold them
> accountable. I advised you that if it came down to it I would pay from
> my life insurance if I was allowed to withdraw and not affect my
> lawsuit (DANA-LEE vs GOVERNMENT OF SASKATCHEWAN).
>
> I ask you if you are the lawyer for Wayne Narvey?
> You have a retainer with him as a personal lawyer with JCCF as the
> payee correct?
> His court is now complete. And JCCF has confirmed they would pay. I
> also have an admission from Wayne that this is the case. (pictures
> attached)
> They have also paid much to others private lawyers. This raises some
> ethical questions on their actions and explanations to me.
>
> Before I continue Monick I ask you to complete our business and
> contract with answering some questions, providing some services that
> have now arisen due to the oddness of the courts actions. To remain
> loyal to your client that has obeyed all Rights and Freedoms under the
> law. That has paid and treated you with respect.
>
> There are much more intelligent people than I that have been watching
> every social communication and7or Government submissions that I have
> initiated since the days before my stance. The questions and
> investigation that I have been involved with and "I stood in peace on
> these filed documents within the law at all times".
> No Judge within their ethics would ever try my case for a reason. They
> are not only aware of my strong defence, but also aware of the
> investigations I am involved with.
> They were all notified long before my trial date. There are even
> responses from many acknowledging receipt. All 338 of the house of
> commons were notified and possible cabinet meetings associated. The
> Chief of defence notified and etc. Right up to our Prime Minister.
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.blog
>
> I am staying in Ottawa to do some follow up and am able to have a
> meeting with you.
> A call would be insufficient and communications in email seem to be
> misunderstood.
> I am available at your earliest convenience and need to get to a
> finalisation to submit my bill to JCCF. The trust is to be returned to
> an account until such time as I agree to release it.
> I must in the end advise the donors that the money they have sent was
> accounted for as I promised.
> I want you to understand the seriousness and not discount it as "an
> issue between JCCF and I".
> It is also your issue in your new corporation. When we entered our
> agreement, you were a sole proprietorship.
> I am giving you a chance to rectify the mistakes made and continue to
> honour our current retainer.
>
> Thank you,
> Dana-lee Melfi
>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Chrystia Freeland <Chrystia.Freeland@fin.gc.ca>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:52:25 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Announcement from Vincent Gircys.
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: John Carpay <jcarpay@jccf.ca>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:52:23 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Announcement from Vincent Gircys.
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Thank you for contacting me. I am away from the office until Monday
February 5, not able to check email regularly.
For media queries please email media@jccf.ca.
If you need legal assistance, please go to "get legal help" at
www.jccf.ca<http://www.jccf.ca
Justice Centre's legal team requires that requests for legal
assistance be in writing, and does not deal with initial requests by
phone.
For all other inquiries, please contact info@jccf.ca.
Sincerely,
John Carpay, B.A., LL.B.
President
Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Katherine Kowalchuk <info@lawyers4truth.ca>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:52:22 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Announcement from Vincent Gircys.
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Thank you for your email. Given the volume of messages we are
receiving at this time, we may not be able to respond to you in a
timely manner. We thank you for your understanding.
Sincerely,
Lawyers 4 Truth
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:52:21 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Announcement from Vincent Gircys.
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
From: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: RE The "Peace-Man" returns to court in Ottawa on Monday Correct?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
 |
In 2022 I stood in peace and promoted peace in a court ordered legal
protest. I was unlawfully arrested, searched, seizure and detainment,
and charged with f...
|
Sent: January 22, 2024 11:07 AM
To: Dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com <Dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>; monick@grenierlaw.ca <monick@grenierlaw.ca>; pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>; ps.ministerofpublicsafety-
Subject: RE The "Peace-Man" returns to court in Ottawa on Monday Correct?
my work about war etc
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 04:59:35 -0300
Subject: YO Minister Marco Mendicino Methinks its High Time that you
and I create a MOU N'esy Pas Ian Nunn???
To: bestdamnroofer@hotmail.com, freedomcentralcanada@gmail.com
"Marco.Mendicino" <Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, mcu
<mcu@justice.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Norman Traversy
<traversy.n@gmail.com>, sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>,
"stefanos.karatopis" <stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com>
<davesteenburg269@gmail.com>, "freedomreport.ca"
<freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>, Viva Frei <david@vivafrei.com>, premier
<premier@ontario.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
"Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Bill.Hogan"
<Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>, natasha.calvinho@gmail.com, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Mike.Comeau" <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>,
"Anita.Anand" <Anita.Anand@parl.gc.ca>,
"fin.minfinance-financemin.
<fin.minfinance-financemin.
<Chrystia.Freeland@parl.gc.ca>
<Candice.Bergen@parl.gc.ca>, "rob.moore" <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>,
"pierre.poilievre" <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>,
maverickmultimedia@mail.com, inunn@superaje.com,
artinfo6@digitaldoor.net, temp3@digitaldoor.net
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
livefromtheshed2022@gmail.com, freedom2canada@outlook.com,
gregory.re@fox.com, Cmd4pc@gmail.com, james@jamesbowielaw.com,
ontario@cp.org, JustinWells@foxnews.com, ottawanews@ctv.ca,
Michael.Kempa@uottawa.ca, drkempa@gmail.com
https://na01.safelinks.
David Raymond Amos’s Tweets
·
Apr 6
David Raymond Amos
@DavidRaymondAm1
Replying to @DavidRaymondAm1 @DanDonovan4 and 42 others
YO @realGonzaloLira
Go Figure why the link I offered you within @YouTube was blocked
https://na01.safelinks.
#UkraineRussianWar #cdnpoli
366 Comments
David Amos
Say Hoka Hey to NATO or me
https://na01.safelinks.
youtube.com
Vanished: Is There a NATO General In Mariupol?
A good introduction to the entire Skripal affair, and the unanswered
questions: https://na01.safelinks.
David Raymond Amos
@DavidRaymondAm1
Replying to @DavidRaymondAm1 @DanDonovan4 and 44 others
I heard through the grapevine that you ain't dead yet but have been
muzzled bigtime
#UkraineRussianWar #cdnpoli
Too bad so sad that these dudes were not honest with mean old me just
you dudes never were EH? @ikwilson @wikileaks @guardian @ggreenwald
https://na01.safelinks.
youtube.com
FOOD PLANT FIRES: LIVE NEWS COVERAGE...THE CONSPIRACY...THE SHORTAGES
Freedom Reporter and researcher Ian Nunn joins the conversation with
the newest data surrounding a bizarre chain of Food Processing Plant
fires across the U....
Mar 26
Gonzalo Lira
@realGonzaloLira
You want to learn the truth about the Zelensky regime? Google these names:
Vlodymyr Struk
Denis Kireev
Mikhail & Aleksander Kononovich
Nestor Shufrych
Yan Taksyur
Dmitri Djangirov
Elena Berezhnaya
If you haven’t heard from me in 12 hours or more, put my name on this list.
GL
David Raymond Amos
@DavidRaymondAm1
Replying to @realGonzaloLira
This was the last I heard from you
https://na01.safelinks.
youtube.com
Scott Ritter and The Battle of the Donbas
My Telegram channel: https://na01.safelinks.
https://na01.safelinks.
content: https://na01.safelinks.
https://na01.safelinks.
Monday, 26 April 2021
YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON STALKER, all the NATO dudes and
YOU know that I don't send Spam
https://na01.safelinks.
Ready for nuclear holocaust with Russia over Ukraine?
100,941 views
•Apr 16, 2021
5.2K160Share
Save
Tulsi Gabbard
Are we prepared to see our loved ones burn alive in a nuclear
holocaust in a war with Russia over Ukraine? If not, cut out the macho
saber rattling and deescalate before it's too late.
2,080 Comments
David Amos
David Amos
Why did you ignore me when you were running for Presidential Office???
https://na01.safelinks.
https://na01.safelinks.
David Raymond Amos
@DavidRaymondAm1
Replying to @JonathanVize
We just talked about this video that you dudes published Please say Hey to
@HarjitSajjan and the Boyz for me will ya?
https://na01.safelinks.
Canada on alert as Russia military moves into Arctic
846,650 views
Apr 7, 2021
Inside The Story
The Russian military has built a network of bases and stations along
its northern coast in recent years, while developing new weapons that
could hit North America.
3,852 Comments
David Amos
David Amos
Hmmmm
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 23:52:37 -0300
Subject: I trust that his minion Mark Koneda of US Naval Intel and his
FBI pals know why I had no respect for their Biden's old buddy Rep.
Alcee Hastings for rather obvious reasons
To: Dawn.McArdle@mail.house.gov, Matt.Gaetz@mail.house.gov,
bgordon@anchorsgordon.com, patrick.parsons@mail.house.gov
nia_ig.fct@navy.mil, art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca, "Greta.Bossenmaier"
<Greta.Bossenmaier@hq.nato.int
<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
"steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "rob.moore"
<rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
"robert.mckee" <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Ian.Shugart"
<Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, premier
<premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nt.ca>, PREMIER
<PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier
<premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, Office
of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey"
<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.
<fin.minfinance-financemin.
https://na01.safelinks.
Rep. Alcee Hastings dies, narrowing Democratic House majority to just 7
Published Tue, Apr 6 202110:44 AM EDTUpdated Tue, Apr 6 20214:01 PM EDT
Christian Nunley
@cnunley7
Share
Key Points
Rep. Alcee Hastings, D-Fla., died Tuesday at age 84 after a
two-year bout with pancreatic cancer.
Democrats now hold a narrower margin in the House, with a 218-211
split, while six vacant seats remain.
Rep. Alcee Hastings, D-Fla., listens to students speak about their
experiences with gun violence during the The Gun Violence Prevention
Task Force panel Wednesday afternoon May 23, 2018.
Sarah Silbiger | CQ-Roll Call, Inc. | Getty Images
Rep. Alcee Hastings, D-Fla., died Tuesday after a more than two-year
bout with pancreatic cancer, NBC News confirmed.
Hastings, who served in the House for nearly three decades, was 84.
Throughout his career, he held several key committee assignments and
leadership positions, most recently as vice chairman of the rules
committee. He had also been Florida’s first Black federal trial judge,
appointed to the bench in 1979 by President Jimmy Carter.
“As an attorney, civil rights activist and judge, and over his nearly
thirty years in Congress, he fought tirelessly to create opportunities
to lift up working families, communities of color, children and
immigrants,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi wrote in a statement.
President Joe Biden reacted to Hastings’ death on Tuesday afternoon.
“Across his long career of public service, Alcee always stood up to
fight for equality, and always showed up for the working people he
represented,” he said in a statement. “Jill and I are saddened to
learn of his passing.”
Democrats now hold a narrower advantage in the House, 218-211, giving
the party a smaller margin of error in passing legislation. Six seats
are vacant, four of which were previously held by Democrats and two by
Republicans.
Three of the four Democratic House seats were vacated by appointments
to positions in President Joe Biden’s Cabinet. Deb Haaland, of New
Mexico, was appointed secretary of the Department of Interior; Marcia
Fudge, of Ohio, was named head of the Department of Housing and Urban
Development, and Cedric Richmond, of Louisiana, became senior advisor
to the president and director of the White House Office of Public
Engagement.
One of the two vacant GOP seats is no longer up for contest. Julia
Letlow of Louisiana was elected in late March but has yet to be sworn
in. Julia will replace her late husband, Luke Letlow, who was elected
to the seat but died before being sworn in due to Covid-19
complications.
In 1983, when Hastings was a federal judge, he was acquitted in
criminal court on a charge of conspiring to solicit a bribe in
exchange for leniency in a sentencing.
Alcee Hastings testifying at his impeachment trial in 1989.
Michael Jenkins | CQ-Roll Call, Inc. | Getty Images
Nevertheless, the House impeached Hastings in 1988 amid accusations
that he perjured himself during that criminal trial. The Senate voted
to convict him, removing him from the bench, but did not vote to
disqualify him from holding future office.
Hastings appealed the impeachment conviction in 1992. A federal judge
overturned the conviction, on the grounds that a 12-member Senate
committee, rather than the full Senate, conducted the impeachment
trial. This was the first time a Senate conviction was overturned by a
federal judge.
The next year, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled federal courts do not have
the authority to review the procedures of a Senate impeachment trial.
Hastings’ legislative career, which began with his election in 1992
and continued until his death, was unaffected by the decision.
On 4/6/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: NIA_IG <nia_ig.fct@navy.mil>
> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 11:03:08 +0000
> Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] Fwd: Methinks the evil lawyer Howie
> Cooper made a deal with the VERY NASTY FBI dudes in Beantown N'esy Pas
> Howie Anglin?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Dear David Amos,
> The Naval Intelligence Activity (NIA) Office of the Inspector General
> (IG) reviewed your email and attached .WAV file provided to the NIA
> Hotline on 2 April 2021. I found no connection to the United States
> Navy or United States Naval Intelligence.
>
> Naval Inspectors General exist to improve the efficiency and
> effectiveness of US Navy Programs, and strive to eliminate and prevent
> waste, fraud, and abuse with their respective departments. Naval IGs
> are restricted to assessing matters falling within the purview of
> their respective commanders.
>
> Citing the lack of an apparent connection to the US Navy or Naval
> Intelligence, I am unable to provide further assistance, or provide
> direct referral to any other agency or activity.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Mark Koneda
> Investigator
> Naval Intelligence Activity
> Office of the Inspector General
> NIA_IG@navy.mil
> (301)669-3030 (unclass)
> TSVOIP 560-3030
>
> INSPECTOR GENERAL SENSITIVE INFORMATION - FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY The
> information contained in this email and any accompanying attachments
> may contain Inspector General sensitive or pre-decisional information,
> which is protected from mandatory disclosure under the Freedom of
> Information Act (FOIA, 5 USC Section 552). It should not be released
> to unauthorized persons. If you are not the intended recipient of this
> information, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of
> any action in reliance on this information is prohibited. If you
> received this email in error, please notify this office by email or by
> calling (301) 669-3030.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> Sent: Friday, April 2, 2021 12:50 PM
> To: NIA_IG <nia_ig.fct@navy.mil>
> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Fwd: Methinks the evil lawyer Howie Cooper
> made a deal with the VERY NASTY FBI dudes in Beantown N'esy Pas Howie
> Anglin?
Friday, 2 April 2021
Russia warns NATO against deploying troops to Ukraine
https://na01.safelinks.
Image
David Raymond Amos
@DavidRaymondAm1
Replying to @DavidRaymondAm1 @Nyonitz and 49 others
NATO has been picking a fight long before this weekend but big media
ain't been saying much about it until now Methinks it was no
coincidence US Naval Intel people called me on Good Friday N'esy Pas?
https://na01.safelinks.
#nbpoli #cdnpoli #CORRUPTION
https://na01.safelinks.
Ukraine says Russia massing troops on border; U.S. warns Moscow
Dmytro Gorshkov
AFP Staff
Agence France-Presse’s network of 201 bureaus covers 151 countries,
with 80 nationalities represented among its 2,400 collaborators. AFP
is a global news agency delivering in-depth coverage of the events
shaping our world from conflicts to politics, economics, sports,
entertainment and the latest breakthroughs in health, science and
technology.
The Agency operates regional hubs in five geographical zones: Africa,
North America, Latin America, Asia, Middle East
Published Thursday, April 1, 2021 4:09PM EDT
Ukraine
Ukraine has been locked in a conflict with Russian-backed separatists
since 2014. (AFP)
KYIV, UKRAINE -- Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Thursday
accused Moscow of building up troops on his country's border as the
United States warned Russia against "intimidating" Ukraine.
Kiev has been locked in a conflict with Russian-backed separatists
since 2014, and this week Ukrainian officials reported Russian troop
movement in annexed Crimea and on the border, near territories
controlled by Moscow-backed separatists.
On Thursday, Zelensky's ministers discussed the escalating security
situation with Western allies including U.S. Secretary of Defence
Lloyd Austin.
"Muscle-flexing in the form of military exercises and possible
provocations along the border are traditional Russian games," Zelensky
said in a statement.
He accused Moscow of seeking to create "a threatening atmosphere" as
Kiev hopes to resume a ceasefire brokered last year.
The U.S. State Department said it was "absolutely concerned by recent
escalations of Russian aggressive and provocative actions in eastern
Ukraine."
"What we would object to are aggressive actions that have an intent of
intimidating, of threatening, our partner Ukraine," State Department
spokesman Ned Price told reporters.
Some observers say the reported Russian troop buildup is a test for
the administration of U.S. President Joe Biden, who caused an uproar
in Moscow last month by calling his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin
a "killer".
This week, Moscow and Kyiv blamed each other for a rise in violence
between government forces and Kremlin-backed separatists in eastern
Ukraine, which has undermined the ceasefire.
Zelensky said 20 Ukrainian servicemen had been killed and 57 wounded
since the start of the year.
Separately, the military announced that a Ukrainian soldier was
wounded in an attack it blamed on separatists.
'READY FOR AN OFFENSIVE'
On Thursday, U.S. Secretary of Defence Austin called his Ukrainian
counterpart Andriy Taran, Ukraine's defence ministry said.
Austin said during the call that Washington would "not leave Ukraine
alone in the event of escalating Russian aggression", the ministry
said.
Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba for his part discussed the
"aggravation by the Russian Federation of the security situation" on
the frontline with his Canadian counterpart Marc Garneau.
Ukraine's military intelligence accused Russia of preparing to "expand
its military presence" in the separatist-controlled eastern regions of
Donetsk and Lugansk.
In a statement, the intelligence service said it "does not rule out"
an attempt by Russian forces to move "deep into Ukrainian territory".
A high-ranking Ukrainian government official, speaking on condition of
anonymity, claimed that the Russian army was practising "military
co-ordination" with separatists.
"From mid-April their combat units will be ready for an offensive,"
the official told AFP.
WEST SHOULD NOT 'WORRY'
Moscow has repeatedly denied sending troops and arms to buttress the
separatists and Putin's spokesman stressed on Thursday that Moscow is
at liberty to move troops across its territory.
"The Russian Federation moves its armed forces within its territory at
its discretion," spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters, but he did
not directly confirm a troop buildup on the Ukrainian border.
He added that "it should not worry anyone and does not pose a threat to anyone".
The war in eastern Ukraine broke out in 2014 when Russia annexed the
Crimean peninsula following a bloody uprising that ousted Ukraine's
Kremlin-friendly president Viktor Yanukovych.
On Wednesday, the Pentagon said U.S. forces in Europe had raised their
alert status following the "recent escalations of Russian aggression
in eastern Ukraine".
Mark Milley, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, also spoke
with his Russian and Ukrainian counterparts, Valery Gerasimov and
Ruslan Khomchak.
Khomchak said this week that 28,000 separatist fighters and "more than
2,000 Russian military instructors and advisers" are currently
stationed in eastern Ukraine.
On Thursday, the deputy head of Zelensky's office, Roman Mashovets,
called for joint drills with NATO forces to "help stabilise the
security situation".
Zelensky was elected in 2019 promising to end the years-long conflict,
but critics say a shaky ceasefire was his only tangible achievement.
The fighting has claimed more than 13,000 lives since 2014, according
to the United Nations.
https://na01.safelinks.
Top US national security officials call counterparts as Russia and
Ukraine tensions rise
By Oren Liebermann and Barbara Starr, CNN
Updated 8:54 PM ET, Wed March 31, 2021
An Andromeda-D automated control system takes part in an exercise held
by units of the Novorossiysk guards mountain air assault division of
the Russian Airborne Troops at Opuk range in Crimea.
An Andromeda-D automated control system takes part in an exercise held
by units of the Novorossiysk guards mountain air assault division of
the Russian Airborne Troops at Opuk range in Crimea.
(CNN)Top US national security officials have spoken with their
Ukrainian counterparts, and America's top general held a call
Wednesday with his Russian opposite number amid concern over Russian
military activity in Crimea and eastern Ukraine, including what the US
deemed a violation of a ceasefire by Moscow that led to the deaths of
four Ukrainian soldiers last week.
"Russia's destabilizing actions undermine the de-escalation intentions
that had been achieved through [last year's agreement]," chief
Pentagon spokesman John Kirby said Wednesday. "Additionally, we are
aware of Ukrainian military reports concerning Russian troop movements
on Ukraine's borders."
Secretary of State Tony Blinken reaffirmed the "unwavering support" of
the United States for Ukraine's territorial integrity in the face of
"Russia's ongoing aggression in the Donbas and Crimea," according to a
readout of his call with Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba
Wednesday. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley also
spoke to the top Ukrainian general Wednesday, while national security
adviser Jake Sullivan spoke with his Ukrainian counterpart at the
beginning of the week.
The Pentagon had grown increasingly concerned after military
intelligence reports assessed that some 4,000 heavily armed Russian
forces had been observed moving in Crimea, according to a US defense
official. "It was not totally clear what they were up to," the
official said, adding that the US now believes on further assessment
it may have been part of a Russian military exercise. Part of that
assessment was based on calls with Ukrainian officials who also viewed
the Russian activity as an exercise.
If so, the movement of so many Russian military personnel was a large
exercise and may be a deliberate message from the Kremlin to the Biden
administration about Russia's strength in the region and its ability
to challenge US allies, the official said.
This comes as NATO countries on Monday scrambled jets 10 times to
track an unusually high level of Russian military flights over a large
area of Europe including the North Sea, the Black Sea and the Baltic
Sea. NATO jets wound up conducting six intercepts in a six-hour
period.
The Biden administration is taking a tougher approach to Russia, and
Ukraine is only the latest source of tension between the two
adversaries. The White House unveiled a raft of sanctions against
Russian officials and entities at the beginning of the month over the
poisoning of opposition leader Alexey Navalny. President Joe Biden
then warned that Russian President Vladimir Putin would "pay a price"
for his efforts to undermine the 2020 US elections and went on to call
Putin a "killer." Meanwhile, the administration is expected to impose
more sanctions on Russia over election interference and the SolarWinds
cyberattack.
Classified US military war game set to take place as concerns about
threats posed by China and Russia increase
Classified US military war game set to take place as concerns about
threats posed by China and Russia increase
On Wednesday, Milley spoke with his Russian counterpart, Gen. Valery
Gerasimov. While the topics the two generals discussed have not been
made public, behind the scenes the Defense Department has been
concerned for the last several days about the build-up of Russian
troops and equipment along the Ukraine border. The Defense Department
recently raised the so-called "watch condition level" on that region
to gather updated intelligence assessments on Russian activity and
intentions, while monitoring any potential threats. The New York Times
was first to report that development.
Russia blamed Ukraine for renewed fighting in eastern Ukraine. Kremlin
spokesman Dmitry Peskov said this week that Russia was concerned about
"Ukraine's provocations," but he said he hoped it would not escalate
to fighting.
But Ukraine warned of a series of Russian violations of the ceasefire,
including two incidents of mortar fire and large-caliber machine gun
fire that led to the death of the four Ukrainian soldiers last Friday.
On Tuesday, Ukraine accused Russia of violating the ceasefire seven
times, prompting the country's parliament to call for an increase in
political and economic pressure on Moscow.
https://na01.safelinks.
NATO scrambles jets 10 times to track Russian military planes across Europe
By Barbara Starr, CNN Pentagon Correspondent
Updated 1:33 PM ET, Tue March 30, 2021
Norwegian F-16s intercepted two Russian Tu-95 bombers of the type shown here.
Norwegian F-16s intercepted two Russian Tu-95 bombers of the type shown here.
(CNN)NATO scrambled fighter jets 10 times Monday to track and
intercept an unusually "rare peak" of Russian bombers and fighters
flying over the North Sea, Black Sea and Baltic Sea, according to a
NATO official.
"NATO aircraft intercepted six different groups of Russian military
aircraft near alliance airspace in less than six hours," the
organization said in a statement.
The Russian activity across an unusually wide area of European skies
came on the same day North American Aerospace Defense Command said it
tracked Russian aircraft off the coast of Alaska.
None of the Russian aircraft entered the national airspace of NATO
nations in Europe and the intercepts were considered safe, but an
alliance statement detailed the activity.
Norwegian F-16s scrambled after radars detected two groups of Russian
military aircraft near Norway's coastline. The Norwegians intercepted
two Tu-95 Bear bombers which flew south over the North Sea. That
prompted the United Kingdom to send up Typhoon aircraft and Belgium to
deploy F-16 fighters.
The Norwegian F-16s later intercepted two Tu-160 bombers over
international waters nearby.
Separately, NATO radars detected three Russian military aircraft near
allied airspace over the Black Sea which were tracked by Turkish,
Romanian and Bulgarian fighters aircraft until they left the area.
In another encounter, NATO said Italian fighter jets intercepted a
Russian II-38 maritime patrol aircraft which was already being
escorted by Russian fighter jets over the Baltic Sea flying from
Kaliningrad.
CNN reported Saturday that the US is preparing to carry out a
classified war game this summer where a major focus of the scenarios
will be how the US should respond to aggressive action and unexpected
moves by China and Russia.
Tensions with Russia are high, and last week, Secretary of State
Antony Blinken called out Russia for "reckless and adversarial
actions" at a NATO meeting in Brussels and observed that Moscow has
"built up a forces, large scale exercises and acts of intimidation, in
the Baltic and Black Sea."
"Intercepting multiple groups of Russian aircraft demonstrates NATO
forces' readiness and capability to guard Allied skies 24 hours a day,
7 days a week, 365 days a year," Brig. Gen. Andrew Hansen, deputy
chief of staff operations at Allied Air Command, said in the NATO
statement.
NATO aircraft scrambled more than 400 times in 2020 to intercept
unknown aircraft according to the alliance. About 90 percent were in
response to flights by Russian aircraft. NATO says Russian flights
often pose a risk to civilian air traffic over Europe because the
Russians often fly without transmitting a transponder code indicating
their position and altitude and do not file a flight plan or
communicate with air traffic controllers.
Error Icon
Message blocked
Your message to pm@pm.gc.ca has been blocked. See technical details
below for more information.
Message blocked
Your message to art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca has been blocked. See
technical details below for more information.
Message blocked
Your message to wayne.eyre@forces.gc.ca has been blocked. See
technical details below for more information.
Message blocked
Your message to Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca has been blocked. See
technical details below for more information.
Message blocked
Your message to Greta.Bossenmaier@hq.nato.int has been blocked. See
technical details below for more information.
Message blocked
Your message to NIA_IG@navy.mil has been blocked. See technical
details below for more information.
Message blocked
Your message to Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca has been blocked. See
technical details below for more information.
Message blocked
Your message to Jim@conservativewriters.org has been blocked. See
technical details below for more information.
My message was blocked to everyone else as well Go Figure
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 15:41:27 -0400
Subject: Attn LGen Wayne Eyre I just called and tried to explain this
email and Federal Court File No T-1557-15 in particular
To: wayne.eyre@forces.gc.ca, george.young@forces.gc.ca,
Vincent.Rigby@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Shelly.Bruce@cse-cst.gc.ca,
daniel.lauzon@international.
alexander.steinhouse@justica.
anne.dawson@hrsdc-rhdcc.gc.ca, marjorie.michel@tbs-sct.gc.ca,
jamie.innes@qpc-cpr.gc.ca, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nt.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, Premier
<PREMIER@novascotia.ca>, media@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Nathalie Sturgeon
<sturgeon.nathalie@
"kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca>, "Richard.Ames"
<Richard.Ames@gnb.ca>, "Richard.Bragdon" <Richard.Bragdon@parl.gc.ca>,
"Ross.Wetmore" <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "rob.moore"
<rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "John.Williamson"
<John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>,
briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>, BrianThomasMacdonald
<BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.
<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee" <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
---------- Original message ----------
From: Art.McDonald@forces.gc.ca
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:08:24 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO JONATHAN.VANCE You have been ducKing e
since 2015 when I was running iN the election of the 42nd Parliament
and suing the Queen in Federal Court Methinks it is YOU who should
finally call me back N'esy Pas?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
The Acting Chief of the Defence Staff is LGen Wayne Eyre, he may be
reached at wayne.eyre@forces.gc.ca.
Le Chef d'état-major de la Défense par intérim est le LGen Wayne Eyre.
Il peut être rejoint au wayne.eyre@forces.gc.ca.
Art McD
He/Him // Il/Lui
Admiral/amiral Art McDonald
Chief of the Defence Staff (CDS)
Canadian Armed Forces
art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca<
Chef d’état-major de la Defense (CÉMD)
Forces armées canadiennes
art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca<
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 13:08:16 -0400
Subject: YO JONATHAN.VANCE You have been ducKing e since 2015 when I
was running iN the election of the 42nd Parliament and suing the Queen
in
who should finally call me back N'esy Pas?
To: art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca, richard.jolette@forces.gc.ca,
JONATHAN.VANCE@forces.gc.ca, Tammy.Harris@forces.gc.ca,
Jill.Chisholm@justice.gc.ca, Cedric.Aspirault@forces.gc.ca,
Derek.Sloan@parl.gc.ca, Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca,
Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
clare.barry@justice.gc.ca, elder.marques@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@
Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>
Marwan.Tabbara@parl.gc.ca, Yasmin.Ratansi@parl.gc.ca,
Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news-tips
<news-tips@nytimes.com>, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
ombudsman-communications@
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: JONATHAN.VANCE@forces.gc.ca
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:01:09 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON
STALKER, all the NATO dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Admiral Art McDonald is now the Chief of the Defence Staff, he may be
reached at art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca. I will continue to monitor this
account periodically until my retirement from the Canadian Armed
Forces. Please reach out to EA CDS, LCol Richard Jolette at
richard.jolette@forces.gc.ca if you require to get a hold of me.
L'amiral Art McDonald est maintenant le Chef d'état-major de la
Défense, on peut le joindre au art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca. Je
continuerai de surveiller ce compte périodiquement jusqu'à ma retraite
des Forces armées canadiennes. Veuillez contacter CdeC CEMD, Lcol
Richard Jolette au richard.jolette@forces.gc.ca si vous avez besoin de
me contacter.
On 3/11/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:35:27 -0400
> Subject: Re: YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON STALKER, all the
> NATO dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam
> To: Michel.Drapeau@mdlo.ca, "Gilles.Moreau" <Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>
> Cc: mlo-blm@forces.gc.ca, "erin.otoole" <erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca>,
> "Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "jagmeet.singh"
> <jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
> "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
>
> https://na01.safelinks.
>
>
> Prosecuting high-ranking officers a 'significant challenge'
>
> "Retired colonel and lawyer Michel Drapeau, who is a leading expert in
> military justice, said he wonders how a court martial could hear a
> case involving Vance or McDonald when no one in the military,
> including judges, would outrank them."
>
> PERHAPS I SHOULD SUE THEM EH???
>
> On 9/23/19, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> Byrne Furlong
>> Press Secretary
>> Office of the Minister of National Defence
>> 613-996-3100
>>
>> Media Relations
>> Department of National Defence
>> 613-996-2353
>> mlo-blm@forces.gc.ca
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:14:23 -0300
>> Subject: Fwd: YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON STALKER, all the
>> NATO dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam
>> To: Michel.Drapeau@mdlo.ca, Walter.Semianiw@mdlo.ca, Newsroom
>> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>
>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Peter Stoffer
>> STRATEGIC ADVISOR
>>
>> (613) 236-2657 x200
>>
>>
>>
>> Mr. Stoffer served as a Member of Parliament for the riding of
>> Sackville-Eastern Shore from 1997 to 2015. During 2011-2015, he served
>> as the Official Opposition Critic for Veterans Affairs.
>>
>> During this time, Mr. Stoffer was honoured with a variety of awards
>> from the environmental, military, provincial and federal communities.
>> He was named Canada’s Parliamentarian of the year 2013, and he
>> received the Veterans Ombudsman award. Mr Stoffer has been knighted
>> into the Order of St. George and has also been knighted by the King of
>> the Netherlands into the Order of Orange Nassau.
>>
>> He is currently volunteering for a variety of veteran organizations.
>> He is also host to a radio show called “Hour of Heroes in Nova Scotia”
>> on Community Radio, Radio Station 97-5 CIOE-FM, the Voice of the East
>> Coast Music.
>>
>>
>> Colonel-Maître® Michel William Drapeau
>> SENIOR COUNSEL
>> (613) 236-2657 x200
>> Michel.Drapeau@mdlo.ca
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 13:43:40 -0300
>> Subject: YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON STALKER, all the NATO
>> dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam
>> To: JONATHAN.VANCE@forces.gc.ca, "Gilles.Moreau"
>> <Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, stalker.mason@hq.nato.int
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, ombudsman-communications@
>> "Paul.Shuttle" <Paul.Shuttle@pco-bcp.gc.ca>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: MASON.STALKER@forces.gc.ca
>> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:38:01 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: [SUSPECTED SPAM / SPAM SUSPECT] A little
>> Deja Vu for JONATHAN.VANCE et al
>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Good day,
>>
>> Please note that I do not have regular access to DWAN and your email
>> has not been forwarded.
>>
>> Please forward your email to: stalker.mason@hq.nato.int
>>
>> Thank you in advance,
>>
>> MJS
>>
>>
>> On 9/23/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: MASON.STALKER@forces.gc.ca
>>> Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 12:04:41 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks its obvious why the Crown would
>>> drop the charges after Mark Norman's lawyers hit Trudeau and his buddy
>>> Butts with subpoenas N'esy Pas/
>>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Good day,
>>>
>>> Please note that I do not have regular access to DWAN and your email
>>> has not been forwarded.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: JONATHAN.VANCE@forces.gc.ca
>>> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:26:35 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: I see that the the evil blogger in Alberta
>>> Barry Winters aka Mr Baconfat is still practising libel and hate
>>> speech contrary to Sections 300 and 319 0f the Canadian Criminal Code
>>> N'esy Pas Mr Prime Minister Trudeau "The Younger" ???
>>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>
>>> I will be out of the office until 23 February 2016. I am unable to
>>> monitor my e-mail during this time. For urgent matters, please contact
>>> my Chief of Staff, BGen Tammy Harris (Tammy.Harris@forces.gc.ca), or
>>> my EA, Maj Cedric Aspirault (Cedric.Aspirault@forces.gc.ca
>>> whom can contact me.
>>>
>>> Je serai hors du bureau jusqu'au 23 février 2016. Il ne me sera pas
>>> possible de vérifier mes couriels pendant cette période. En cas
>>> d'urgence, veuillez contacter ma chef d'état major, Bgén Tammy Harris
>>> (Tammy.Harris@forces.gc.ca), ou mon CdC, le maj Cédric Aspirault
>>> (Cedric.Aspirault@forces.gc.ca
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Chisholm, Jill" <Jill.Chisholm@justice.gc.ca>
>>> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:26:34 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: I see that the the evil blogger in Alberta
>>> Barry Winters aka Mr Baconfat is still practising libel and hate
>>> speech contrary to Sections 300 and 319 0f the Canadian Criminal Code
>>> N'esy Pas Mr Prime Minister Trudeau "The Younger" ???
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Thank you for your message. I will be away from the office until
>>> Friday, February 26, 2016 and will not be accessing email frequently
>>> during this time. Should you require assistance please contact
>>> Jacqueline Fenton at (902) 426-6996. Otherwise I will be pleased to
>>> respond to your message upon my return.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada
>>> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
>>> Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 16:46:28 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: YOr Ralph Goodale Methinks this should
>>> stress the Integrity of the Globe and Mail and your minions in the
>>> RCMP N'esy Pas?
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
>>> Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
>>> Please be assured that your email has been received and will be read
>>> with
>>> care.
>>> However, in light of the federal elections being held on October 21,
>>> there may be a delay in processing your email.
>>>
>>> ______________________________
>>>
>>> Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
>>> Justice et procureur général du Canada.
>>> Soyez assuré que votre courriel a bien été reçu et que celui-ci sera
>>> lu avec soin.
>>> Cependant, compte tenu des élections fédérales du 21 octobre prochain,
>>> veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le
>>> traitement de votre courriel.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Oreiginal message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>> Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 13:02:10 -0300
>>> Subject: A little Deja Vu for Ralph Goodale and the RCMP before I file
>>> my next lawsuit as promised
>>> To: Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca,
>>> Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
>>> Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> elder.marques@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
>>> Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca, "clare.barry"
>>> clare.barry@justice.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
>>> alaina@alainalockhart.ca, info@ginettepetitpastaylor.ca,
>>> oldmaison@yahoo.com, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca, daniel.mchardie@cbc.ca,
>>> info@waynelong.ca, matt@mattdecourcey.ca, info@sergecormier.ca,
>>> pat@patfinnigan.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, tj@tjharvey.ca,
>>> karen.ludwig.nb@gmail.com, votejohnw@gmail.com,
>>> PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com
>>> postur@fjr.stjr.is, Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca,
>>> Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> David.Akin@globalnews.ca, dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Dave.Young@nbeub.ca, jfurey@nbpower.com,
>>> jfetzer@d.umn.edu, postur@irr.is, birgittajoy@gmail.com,
>>> birgitta@this.is>, Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca, Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca,
>>> blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, kris.austin@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca,
>>> carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> Michel.Carrier@gnb.ca, Yves.Cote@elections.ca, Greg.Bonnar@gnb.ca
>>> Cc: motomaniac333@gmail.com, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
>>> fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Telford, Katie" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
>>> Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 13:14:20 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: YO Mr Butts Here are some more comments
>>> published within CBC that the RCMP and their boss Ralph Goodale should
>>> review ASAP N'esy Pas?
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>> I am out of the office until Tuesday, October 22nd without access to
>>> this
>>> email.
>>> In my absence, you may contact Mike McNair
>>> (michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca<
>>> Elder Marques
>>> (elder.marques@pmo-cpm.gc.ca<
>>> Warm regards,
>>> Katie
>>> ______
>>> Bonjour,
>>> Je suis absente du bureau jusqu'au mardi 22 octobre sans accès à mes
>>> courriels.
>>> Durant mon absence, veuillez communiquer avec Mike McNair
>>> (michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca<
>>> Elder Marques
>>> (elder.marques@pmo-cpm.gc.ca<
>>> Cordialement,
>>> Katie
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Butts, Gerald" <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 06:33:26 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: So Much for the Strong Ethics of the Strong
>>> Organization commonnly knows as the RCMP/GRC N'esy Pas?
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> Thank you for your email. I am out of the office with limited access
>>> to email. For assistance, please email Laura D'Angelo at
>>> laura.d'angelo@pmo-cpm.gc.ca.
>>>
>>> Merci pour votre message. Je suis absent du bureau avec un accèss
>>> limité aux courriels. Si vous avez besoin d'assistance, veuillez
>>> communiquer avec Laura D'Angelo à l'adresse
>>> laura.d'angelo@pmo-cpm.gc.ca
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
>>> Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 06:30:48 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: So Much for the Strong Ethics of the Strong
>>> Organization commonnly knows as the RCMP/GRC N'esy Pas?
>>> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
>>> of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
>>>
>>> This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
>>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
>>> may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
>>> message will be carefully reviewed.
>>>
>>> To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
>>> the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
>>>
>>> Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
>>> Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the
>>> Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future
>>> correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write
>>> directly to the Department of Justice at
>>> mcu@justice.gc.ca<mailto:mcu@
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>>
>>> -------------------
>>>
>>> Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
>>> Vancouver Granville.
>>>
>>> Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
>>> courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
>>> correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
>>> votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
>>>
>>> Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
>>> veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
>>> votre adresse et votre code postal.
>>>
>>> Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
>>> la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
>>> d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
>>> Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
>>> Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
>>> mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.
>>>
>>> Merci
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale (PS/SP)" <Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
>>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:53:15 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Emails to Department of Justice and
>>> Province of Nova Scotia
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la
>>> S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile.
>>> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
>>> adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un
>>> retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre
>>> message sera examin? avec attention.
>>> Merci!
>>> L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle
>>> S?curit? publique Canada
>>> *********
>>>
>>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of
>>> Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
>>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
>>> addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in
>>> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
>>> carefully reviewed.
>>> Thank you!
>>> Ministerial Correspondence Unit
>>> Public Safety Canada
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
>>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:53:11 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Emails to Department of Justice and
>>> Province of Nova Scotia
>>> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
>>> of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
>>>
>>> This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
>>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
>>> may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
>>> message will be carefully reviewed.
>>>
>>> To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
>>> the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
>>>
>>> Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
>>> Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the
>>> Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future
>>> correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write
>>> directly to the Department of Justice at
>>> mcu@justice.gc.ca<mailto:mcu@
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>>
>>> -------------------
>>>
>>> Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
>>> Vancouver Granville.
>>>
>>> Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
>>> courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
>>> correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
>>> votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
>>>
>>> Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
>>> veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
>>> votre adresse et votre code postal.
>>>
>>> Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
>>> la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
>>> d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
>>> Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
>>> Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
>>> mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.
>>>
>>> Merci
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
>>> <fin.minfinance-financemin.
>>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:53:17 +0000
>>> Subject: RE: Re Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova
>>> Scotia
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
>>> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
>>> comments.
>>>
>>> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
>>> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
>>> commentaires.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
>>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:53:16 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Emails to Department of Justice and
>>> Province of Nova Scotia
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>>>
>>> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
>>> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
>>> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
>>>
>>> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
>>> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
>>>
>>> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>>>
>>> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
>>> press releases.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 12:53:03 -0400
>>> Subject: Re Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>>> To: wrscott@nbpower.com, "brian.gallant" <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
>>> "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"
>>> <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, krisaustin <krisaustin@peoplesalliance.ca
>>> "rick.doucet" <rick.doucet@gnb.ca>, "Sollows, David (ERD/DER)"
>>> <david.sollows@gnb.ca>, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
>>> "robert.gauvin" <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca,
>>> "Bill.Fraser" <Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca>, "John.Ames" <John.Ames@gnb.ca>,
>>> gerry.lowe@gnb.ca, "hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>,
>>> michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, "art.odonnell" <art.odonnell@nb.aibn.com>,
>>> "jake.stewart" <jake.stewart@gnb.ca>, mike.holland@gnb.ca, votejohnw
>>> <votejohnw@gmail.com>, andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca,
>>> greg.thompson2@gnb.ca, jean-claude.d'amours@gnb.ca,
>>> jacques.j.leblanc@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, keith.chiasson@gnb.ca,
>>> "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, robert.mckee@gnb.ca,
>>> rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy"
>>> <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, gphlaw@nb.aibn.com, wharrison
>>> <wharrison@nbpower.com>, "Furey, John" <jfurey@nbpower.com>,
>>> "Jody.Wilson-Raybould" <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
>>> "clare.barry" <clare.barry@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
>>> "hon.ralph.goodale" <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>,
>>> "Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc" <Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca
>>> <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>,
>>> JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca, LauraLee.Langley@novascotia.ca
>>> Karen.Hudson@novascotia.ca, Joanne.Munro@novascotia.ca, Newsroom
>>> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, news
>>> <news@dailygleaner.com>
>>> Cc: "David.Raymond.Amos" <David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com>
>>> <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Victoria.Zinck@novascotia.ca,
>>> Kim.Fleming@novascotia.ca
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: "McGrath, Stephen T" <Stephen.McGrath@novascotia.ca
>>> Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 12:40:22 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Does anyone recall the email entitled "So
>>> Stephen McGrath if not you then just exactly who sent me this latest
>>> email from your office?"
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Thanks for your message, however I am no longer at the Department of
>>> Justice, and this email account is not being monitored.
>>>
>>> Please contact Kim Fleming at Kim.Fleming@novascotia.ca (phone
>>> 902-424-4023), or Vicky Zinck at Victoria.Zinck@novascotia.ca (phone
>>> 902-424-4390). Kim and Vicky will be able to redirect you.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos,
>>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>>> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
>>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>>
>>> Department of Justice
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 15:16:38 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Laura Lee Langley, Karen Hudson and Joanne Munro I just
>>> called all three of your offices to inform you of my next lawsuit
>>> against Nova Scotia
>>> To: LauraLee.Langley@novascotia.ca
>>> Joanne.Munro@novascotia.ca
>>> Cc: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> Laura Lee Langley
>>> 1700 Granville Street, 5th Floor
>>> One Government Place
>>> Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 1X5
>>> Phone: (902) 424-8940
>>> Fax: (902) 424-0667
>>> Email: LauraLee.Langley@novascotia.ca
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> Karen Hudson Q.C.
>>> 1690 Hollis Street, 7th Floor
>>> Joseph Howe Building
>>> Halifax, NS B3J 3J9
>>> Phone: (902) 424-4223
>>> Fax: (902) 424-0510
>>> Email: Karen.Hudson@novascotia.ca
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> Joanne Munro:
>>> 1505 Barrington Street, 14-South
>>> Maritime Centre
>>> Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3K5
>>> Phone: (902) 424-4089
>>> Fax: (902) 424-5510
>>> Email: Joanne.Munro@novascotia.ca
>>>
>>> If you don't wish to speak to me before I begin litigation then I
>>> suspect the Integrity Commissioner New Brunswick or the Federal Crown
>>> Counsel can explain the email below and the documents hereto attached
>>> to you and your Premier etc.
>>>
>>> Veritas Vincit
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>> 902 800 0369
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Good Day Sir
>>>
>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>
>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>
>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>
>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>>
>>> Dec 14th https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> January 11th, 2016 https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>>
>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>>
>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>
>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>>
>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>
>>> Date: 20151223
>>>
>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>
>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>
>>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>>
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>
>>> Plaintiff
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>
>>> Defendant
>>>
>>> ORDER
>>>
>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>
>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>> in its entirety.
>>>
>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>>> he stated:
>>>
>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>
>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>> Police.
>>>
>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>
>>>
>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>
>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>> Judge
>>>
>>>
>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>
>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>
>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>> most
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>
>>> January 13, 2015
>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>
>>> December 8, 2014
>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>
>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau?
>>>
>>>
>>> Vertias Vincit
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>> 902 800 0369
>>>
>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>
>>> Subject:
>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>
>>> January 30, 2007
>>>
>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>
>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>
>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>
>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>> Minister of Health
>>>
>>> CM/cb
>>>
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>
>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>
>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>
>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>
>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>>
>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>> United States Senate
>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>
>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>> raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that
>>> these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in
>>> contact
>>> with you about this previously.
>>>
>>> Very truly yours,
>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>
>>> Hon. Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.
>>> Integrity Commissioner
>>>
>>> Hon. Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., who resides in Bathurst, N.B., is a
>>> native of Kedgwick, N.B., and is married to Huguette (Savoie)
>>> Deschênes. They have two sons.
>>>
>>> He studied at Saint-Joseph University (now Université de Moncton) from
>>> 1960 to 1962, University of Ottawa from 1962-1965 (B.A.), and
>>> University of New Brunswick (LL.B., 1968). He was admitted to the Law
>>> Society of New Brunswick in 1968. He was legal counsel to the
>>> Department of Justice in Fredericton from 1968 to 1971. He was in
>>> private practice from 1972 to 1982 and specialized in civil litigation
>>> as a partner in the law firm of Michaud, Leblanc, Robichaud, and
>>> Deschênes. While residing in Shediac, N.B., he served on town council
>>> and became the first president of the South East Economic Commission.
>>> He is a past president of the Richelieu Club in Shediac.
>>>
>>> In 1982, he was appointed a judge of the Court of Queen’s Bench of New
>>> Brunswick and of the Court of Appeal of New Brunswick in 2000.
>>>
>>> On July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the Court Martial Appeal Court of
>>> Canada.
>>>
>>> While on the Court of Appeal of New Brunswick, he was appointed
>>> President of the provincial Judicial Council and in 2012 Chairperson
>>> of the Federal Electoral Boundaries Commission for the Province of New
>>> Brunswick for the 2015 federal election.
>>>
>>> He was appointed Conflict of Interest Commissioner in December 2016
>>> and became New Brunswick’s first Integrity Commissioner on December
>>> 16, 2016 with responsibilities for conflict of interest issues related
>>> to Members of the Legislative Assembly. As of April 1, 2017 he
>>> supervises lobbyists of public office holders under the Lobbyists’
>>> Registration Act.
>>>
>>> As of September 1, 2017, he will be assuming the functions presently
>>> held by the Access to Information and Privacy Commissioner.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
>>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:05:47 +0000
>>> Subject: Re: Hey Premier Gallant please inform the questionable
>>> parliamentarian Birigtta Jonsdottir that although NB is a small "Have
>>> Not" province at least we have twice the population of Iceland and
>>> that not all of us are as dumb as she and her Prime Minister pretends
>>> to be..
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received
>>>
>>> Kveðja / Best regards
>>> Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: Póstur IRR <postur@irr.is>
>>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:05:47 +0000
>>> Subject: Re: Hey Premier Gallant please inform the questionable
>>> parliamentarian Birigtta Jonsdottir that although NB is a small "Have
>>> Not" province at least we have twice the population of Iceland and
>>> that not all of us are as dumb as she and her Prime Minister pretends
>>> to be..
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received.
>>>
>>> Kveðja / Best regards
>>> Innanríkisráðuneytið / Ministry of the Interior
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)" <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 21:39:17 +0000
>>> Subject: RE: After crossing paths with them bigtime in 2004 Davey Baby
>>> Coon and his many Green Meanie and Fake Left cohorts know why I won't
>>> hold my breath waiting for them to act with any semblance of integrity
>>> now N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc??
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick.
>>> Please be assured that your email has been received, will be reviewed,
>>> and a response will be forthcoming.
>>> Once again, thank you for taking the time to write.
>>>
>>> Merci d'avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du Nouveau-Brunswick.
>>> Soyez assuré que votre courriel a bien été reçu, qu'il sera examiné
>>> et qu'une réponse vous sera acheminée.
>>> Merci encore d'avoir pris de temps de nous écrire.
>>>
>>> Sincerely, / Sincèrement,
>>> Mallory Fowler
>>> Corespondence Manager / Gestionnaire de la correspondance
>>> Office of the Premier / Cabinet du premier ministre
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
>>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 21:43:50 +0000
>>> Subject: Re: After crossing paths with them bigtime in 2004 Davey Baby
>>> Coon and his many Green Meanie and Fake Left cohorts know why I won't
>>> hold my breath waiting for them to act with any semblance of integrity
>>> now N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc??
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received
>>>
>>> Kveðja / Best regards
>>> Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Póstur IRR <postur@irr.is>
>>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 21:43:50 +0000
>>> Subject: Re: After crossing paths with them bigtime in 2004 Davey Baby
>>> Coon and his many Green Meanie and Fake Left cohorts know why I won't
>>> hold my breath waiting for them to act with any semblance of integrity
>>> now N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc??
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received.
>>>
>>> Kveðja / Best regards
>>> Innanríkisráðuneytið / Ministry of the Interior
>>>
>>>
>>> For the public record I knew Birgitta was no better than the people
>>> she bitches about when she refused to discuss the QSLS blog with me
>>> while she was in Canada making her rounds in the Canadain media in
>>> January of 2011.
>>>
>>>
>>> This is the docket
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> These are digital recordings of the last two hearings
>>>
>>> Dec 14th https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> Jan 11th https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> This me running for a seat in Parliament again while CBC denies it again
>>>
>>> Fundy Royal, New Brunswick Debate – Federal Elections 2015 - The Local
>>> Campaign, Rogers TV
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> Veritas Vincit
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>> 902 800 0369
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:20:29 -0400
>>> Subject: Hey before you Red Coats swear an Oath to the Queen and the
>>> 42nd Parliament begins perhaps the turncoat Big Bad Billy Casey the
>>> Yankee carpetbagger David Lutz or some Boyz from NB should explain
>>> this lawsuit to you real slow.
>>> To: alaina@alainalockhart.ca, david <david@lutz.nb.ca>,
>>> "daniel.mchardie" <daniel.mchardie@cbc.ca>, info@waynelong.ca,
>>> info@ginettepetitpastaylor.ca, rarseno@nbnet.nb.ca,
>>> matt@mattdecourcey.ca, info@sergecormier.ca, pat@patfinnigan.ca,
>>> tj@tjharvey.ca, karen.ludwig.nb@gmail.com
>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>> <Frank.McKenna@td.com>, info@votezsteve.ca, info@billcasey.ca,
>>> "justin.trudeau.a1" <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
>>> "dominic.leblanc.a1" <dominic.leblanc.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, jacques_poitras <jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>,
>>> "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "peter.mackay"
>>> <peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>> most
>>>
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>
>>> January 13, 2015
>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>
>>> December 8, 2014
>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>
>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>
>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>
>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>
>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>
>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>
>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>
>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>> essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An
>>> ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear
>>> and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,”
>>> or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of
>>> terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states
>>> “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of
>>> Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an
>>> ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the
>>> Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
>>>
>>> One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty
>>> was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the
>>> amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time
>>> denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time
>>> self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of
>>> “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the
>>> G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious
>>> behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister
>>> Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully
>>> cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits
>>> are not.
>>>
>>> Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal
>>> mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the
>>> world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy”
>>> David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security
>>> and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can
>>> and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing
>>> “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war
>>> criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending
>>> tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
>>>
>>> In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
>>> “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
>>> successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing,
>>> marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian
>>> military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern
>>> equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are
>>> antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five
>>> years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that
>>> won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
>>>
>>> My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
>>> Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin
>>> Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not
>>> served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social
>>> democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and
>>> other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet
>>> these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to
>>> other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
>>>
>>> Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security,
>>> and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before
>>> shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
>>>
>>> Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now
>>>
>>> From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
>>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
>>> Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and
>>> the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still
>>> alive
>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
>>> your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply
>>> to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
>>> Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the
>>> War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
>>> To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil,
>>> Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.
>>> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca,
>>> milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca,
>>> sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari
>>> <smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
>>> susan@blueskystrategygroup.com
>>> eugene@blueskystrategygroup.
>>> Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice" <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin"
>>> <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower
>>> <whistleblower@ctv.ca>
>>>
>>> I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David
>>> Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's
>>> Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on
>>> CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To
>>> be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested
>>> that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise
>>> if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else
>>> about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact that your
>>> old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English
>>> never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is
>>> interesting though
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
>>> this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
>>> Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad
>>> Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a
>>> shy political animal
>>>
>>> Veritas Vincit
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>> 902 800 0369
>>>
>>> Enjoy Mr Weston
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
>>> brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
>>> says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
>>> to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
>>> including a Canadian general.
>>>
>>> That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
>>> who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
>>> U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was
>>> also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
>>> prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> "I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
>>> being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
>>> demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
>>> "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
>>> into the US policy.
>>>
>>> At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
>>> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
>>> in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
>>> report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was
>>> never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
>>> were deployed WMD.
>>>
>>> Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
>>> invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
>>> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
>>> (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
>>> about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
>>> that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
>>> authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
>>>
>>> There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
>>> its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
>>> to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
>>> folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
>>> upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions
>>> are to met before US troop can redeploy? Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>> and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of
>>> Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them
>>> correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the
>>> George W Bush administration was onerous
>>>
>>> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
>>> military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
>>> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
>>> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
>>> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
>>> operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
>>> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
>>> ....not necessarily in that order. "
>>>
>>> You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
>>> Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>
>
Wayne Narvey 506 260 4451
wayne narvey arrested at protest #every child matters # convoy2022
Curtis Bartibogue
David Amos
@davidamos7114
Hmmm
Wayne Narvey
Jack Lynn
1 Comment
David Amos
@davidamos7114
Hmmm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Tactical units breach ‘Freedom Convoy’ motorhome | Ottawa protests
CTV News
4,099 Comments
David Amos
@davidamos7114
Hmmm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Protester: 'We're not leaving' Ottawa demo site
AP Archive
1,447 Comments
David Amos
@davidamos7114
Hmmm
Réjean Savoie
Article
Talk
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Honourable
Réjean Savoie
MLA
Savoie in 2023
Minister responsible for the Regional Development Corporation
Incumbent
Assumed office
October 13, 2022
Succeeded by Gary Crossman
Member of the
New Brunswick Legislative Assembly
for Miramichi Bay
In office
June 7, 1999 – June 9, 2003
Preceded by Danny Gay
Succeeded by Carmel Robichaud
Member of the
New Brunswick Legislative Assembly
for Miramichi Bay-Neguac
Incumbent
Assumed office
June 20, 2022
Preceded by Lisa Harris
Personal details
Political party Progressive Conservative
Réjean Savoie (born September 15, 1952) is a businessman and political
figure in New Brunswick. He is the Progressive Conservative Party MLA
for Miramichi Bay-Neguac since 2022 in a by-election to replace Lisa
Harris, having previously represented Miramichi Bay in the Legislative
Assembly of New Brunswick from 1999 to 2003.
He was born in Saint-Wilfred, New Brunswick, the son of Levi Savoie
and Exéline Roy. Savoie studied at the Bathurst Technical School and
the New Brunswick Community College. He worked as a tractor trailer
operator and also owned and operated a restaurant and service station.
Savoie served as a member of the school board and as a member of the
board of directors for the Neguac Medical Clinic and the l’Hotel-Dieu
Hospital in Chatham.
He returned to office after winning the June 2022 by-election in
Miramichi Bay-Neguac.[1]
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 18:58:47 -0400
Subject: Fwd: hey
To: waynenarvey@hotmail.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 12:56:02 -0400
Subject: Fwd: hey
To: AngryScotian@proton.me
Notice the webcast and transcript is missing then checkout pages 1, 2, 3 and 13
https://www.banking.senate.gov
Full Committee Hearing
Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the
Mutual Fund Industry
Date: Thursday, November 20, 2003 Time: 02:00 PM
Topic
The Committee will meet in OPEN SESSION to conduct the second in a
series of hearings on the “Review of Current Investigations and
Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry.”
Witnesses
Witness Panel 1
Mr. Stephen M. Cutler
Director - Division of Enforcement
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cutler - November 20, 2003
Mr. Robert Glauber
Chairman and CEO
National Association of Securities Dealers
Glauber - November 20, 2003
Eliot Spitzer
Attorney General
State of New York
Spitzer - November 20, 2003
.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 16:33:42 -0400
Subject: Attn Daniel J. Song we just talked
To: djsong@pringlelaw.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 13:30:55 -0400
Subject: Fwd: hey
To: prontoman1@protonmail.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 12:56:02 -0400
Subject: Fwd: hey
To: AngryScotian@proton.me
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 19:01:03 -0400
Subject: Fwd: hey
To: Dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 18:33:20 -0400
Subject: hey
To: monick@grenierlaw.ca
Notice the webcast and transcript is missing then checkout pages 1, 2, 3 and 13
https://www.banking.senate.gov
Full Committee Hearing
Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the
Mutual Fund Industry
Date: Thursday, November 20, 2003 Time: 02:00 PM
Topic
The Committee will meet in OPEN SESSION to conduct the second in a
series of hearings on the “Review of Current Investigations and
Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry.”
Witnesses
Witness Panel 1
Mr. Stephen M. Cutler
Director - Division of Enforcement
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cutler - November 20, 2003
Mr. Robert Glauber
Chairman and CEO
National Association of Securities Dealers
Glauber - November 20, 2003
Eliot Spitzer
Attorney General
State of New York
Spitzer - November 20, 2003
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 19:01:03 -0400
Subject: Fwd: hey
To: Dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 18:33:20 -0400
Subject: hey
To: monick@grenierlaw.ca
Daniel J. Song
Called to the bar: 2007 (AB)
Pringle Chivers Sparks Teskey
300-10150 100 St. N.W.
Edmonton, Alberta T5J 0P6
Phone: 604-669-7447
Fax: 604-259-6171
Email: djsong@pringlelaw.ca
Cell 780 288 7889
https://davidraymondamos3.blog
Sunday 4 February 2024
COUTTS 4, Chris Lysak legal defense fundraiser 1 of 4
https://davidraymondamos3.blo
Wednesday 22 November 2023
I just called Jeremy Mackenzie (639 318 9073) and his lawyer Mr Foda
AGAIN Correct?
https://rumble.com/v3x39m1-com
Community Support w/ Morgan Mayhem
The Lavigne Show
2.07K followers
Streamed on: Nov 22, 8:00 am EST
Join us for an insightful conversation with Morgan Mayhem, also known
as @QueenOfDiagolon, as we delve into the significance of community
support and the crucial need to restore trust in fundraising. We'll
explore the challenges posed by government interference, particularly
how it leads to debanking and fosters mistrust in grassroots
initiatives. Our aim is to establish a reliable framework that ensures
direct support for transparent causes. Drawing inspiration from Chris
Lysak's successful campaign to raise $150,000 for legal
representation, we'll discuss the benefits of a new fundraising model
that eliminates intermediaries and fosters trust.
https://twitter.com/QueenOfDia
Image
Automatic reply: Hey Sherif Foda Sue me or call the cops will ya?
Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
<Premier@ontario.ca> Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 8:34 PM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
YO Mr Trudeau Need I say Bah Humbug again???
Sherif Foda
<sherif@fodalaw.com> Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 7:57 PM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Please stop contacting me via any means.
David Amos
<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
To: ragingdissident@protonmail.com
<motomaniac333@gmail.com>, blevy@postmedia.com, "rick@fodalaw.com, pm
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, \"Michael.Duheme"
<Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Cc: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.ab.ca>, paulpalango <paulpalango@protonmail.com>, Office
of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.nl.ca>
Dec 14th, 2015 https://archive.org/details/Ba
>>>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogs
>>>>>
>>>>> 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>>>
>>>>> January 13, 2015
>>>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>>>
>>>>> December 8, 2014
>>>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>>>
>>>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>>>
>>>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>>>
>>>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>>>
>>>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>>>
>>>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>>>
>>>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>>>> essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An
>>>>> ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear
>>>>> and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,”
>>>>> or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of
>>>>> terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states
>>>>> “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of
>>>>> Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an
>>>>> ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the
>>>>> Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
>>>>>
>>>>> One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty
>>>>> was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the
>>>>> amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time
>>>>> denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time
>>>>> self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of
>>>>> “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the
>>>>> G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious
>>>>> behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister
>>>>> Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully
>>>>> cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits
>>>>> are not.
>>>>>
>>>>> Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal
>>>>> mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the
>>>>> world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy”
>>>>> David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security
>>>>> and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can
>>>>> and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing
>>>>> “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war
>>>>> criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending
>>>>> tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
>>>>>
>>>>> In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
>>>>> “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
>>>>> successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing,
>>>>> marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian
>>>>> military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern
>>>>> equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are
>>>>> antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five
>>>>> years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that
>>>>> won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
>>>>>
>>>>> My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
>>>>> Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin
>>>>> Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not
>>>>> served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social
>>>>> democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and
>>>>> other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet
>>>>> these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to
>>>>> other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
>>>>>
>>>>> Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security,
>>>>> and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before
>>>>> shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
>>>>>
>>>>> Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now
>>>>>
>>>>> From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
>>>>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
>>>>> Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and
>>>>> the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still
>>>>> alive
>>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
>>>>> your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply
>>>>> to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
>>>>> Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the
>>>>> War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
>>>>> To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil,
>>>>> Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.
>>>>> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>> dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca,
>>>>> milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca,
>>>>> sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari
>>>>> <smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
>>>>> susan@blueskystrategygroup.com
>>>>> eugene@blueskystrategygroup.co
>>>>> Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice" <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin"
>>>>> <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower
>>>>> <whistleblower@ctv.ca>
>>>>>
>>>>> I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David
>>>>> Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's
>>>>> Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on
>>>>> CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To
>>>>> be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested
>>>>> that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise
>>>>> if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else
>>>>> about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact that your
>>>>> old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English
>>>>> never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is
>>>>> interesting though
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.blueskystrategygrou
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/me
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
>>>>> this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
>>>>> Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad
>>>>> Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718
>>>>>
>>>>> The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a
>>>>> shy political animal
>>>>>
>>>>> Veritas Vincit
>>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>>> 902 800 0369
>>>>>
>>>>> Enjoy Mr Weston
>>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/news
>>>>>
>>>>> "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
>>>>> brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
>>>>> says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
>>>>> to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
>>>>> including a Canadian general.
>>>>>
>>>>> That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
>>>>> who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
>>>>> U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was
>>>>> also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
>>>>> prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
>>>>>
>>>>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.com
>>>>>
>>>>> "I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
>>>>> being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
>>>>> demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
>>>>> "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
>>>>> into the US policy.
>>>>>
>>>>> At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
>>>>> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
>>>>> in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
>>>>> report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was
>>>>> never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
>>>>> were deployed WMD.
>>>>>
>>>>> Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
>>>>> invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
>>>>> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
>>>>> (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
>>>>> about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
>>>>> that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
>>>>> authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
>>>>>
>>>>> There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
>>>>> its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
>>>>> to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
>>>>> folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
>>>>> upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions
>>>>> are to met before US troop can redeploy? Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>>>> and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of
>>>>> Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them
>>>>> correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the
>>>>> George W Bush administration was onerous
>>>>>
>>>>> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
>>>>> military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
>>>>> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
>>>>> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
>>>>> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
>>>>> operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
>>>>> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
>>>>> ....not necessarily in that order. "
>>>>>
>>>>> You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
>>>>> Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.socom.mil/SOCOMHome
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
DIAGALON Jeremy Mackenzie COMPLETE TESTIMONY
this guy's garage
45.2K subscribers
10,248 views Nov 4, 2022
PUBLIC ORDER EMERGENCY COMMISION Schedule Public hearings will begin
on Thursday, October 13 and run until Friday, November 25. The
hearings will take place every weekday except on Remembrance Day,
Friday Nov 11. The hearings will begin at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time each
day and may run until 6 p.m. or later if required.
208 Comments
@davidamos7114
@davidamos7114
Thanks
Pinned by this guy's garage
@SyD6_7@SyD6_7
With this testimony and previous experience watching it all play out.
Diagolon and Jeremy Mackenzie should be 100% Exonerated in the
Canadians eyes now. This is and will be remembered as the greatest
Intelligence failure in Canadian history. Maybe if we did not have
Antifa [antihatecanada] being paid MILLIONS from the government to
MAKE the evidence, it would be different. Maybe if it was not obvious
that the entire intelligence apparatus is now focus on anyone who will
not ideologically align themselves with the PM and WEF and woke
activism, ex: DEIA, it would be different. Sadly it is now obvious
that the entire federal and political policing and intelligence
establishment is now a political wing of the WEF and is policing
thought crimes and anti-woke sentiment INSTEAD of criminals. They are
fluent Identarian ideologues. The liberal revolving door policies on
criminals and especially violent ones, and criminalizing of innocent
hunting and shooting families that have never done no one wrong, all
points to the ideological adherence to anti-Canadian values and
systems of oppression from outside the nation itself. Our government
has been corrupted from the inside out from it, and we the people need
to begin to see it for what it is and systematically remove the
disease like a surgeon would. They have pushed Identarian ideologies
as religious zeal on children and we are losing generations to it. If
you do not, or never voted, now is the time. There is only a few legal
means to fix this solution and EVERY SINGLE ONE MUST BE TRIED. This
must not become what no one wants it to become. That said, if the
masses do not wake up to the realization that they have been used for
a horrible purpose, there is little hope. <3 to all who oppose evil
and tyranny in its forms, quiet or loud, for the people, for the true
north, strong and free, for mons, dads, and children, for those not
even born yet, those we have lost, and those that will be lost along
the way, you are all heroes. History will never forget this black
patch of Canadian politics. When those that cried for
reconciliation[of all, should know better], unity, forgiveness, turned
on everyone and became monsters, and the government used that to gain
power over us all. <3 much love to all. This fight is just starting.
“The truth is like a lion; you don’t have to defend it. Let it loose;
it will defend itself.” -Augustine of Hippo “If you would know who
controls you see who you may not criticize.” - Tacitus "Darkness
cannot drive out darkness; Only light can do that. Hate cannot drive
out hate; only love can do that." Martin Luther King Jr. "I am a
Canadian, a free Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship
God in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to
oppose what I believe wrong, free to choose those who shall govern my
country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and
all mankind.” -John George Diefenbaker & now, Pierre Poilievre [Bill
of rights and freedoms 1960]
I just called Jeremy Mackenzie (639 318 9073 and his lawyer Mr Foda
AGAIN Correct?
Levy, Bryn
<BLevy@postmedia.com> Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 2:41 PM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Im sorry - I'm not sure what you're asking me:
I can confirm that Mr. Foda indicated he was Mackenzie's lawyer at the
hearing I attended/ covered in 2022.
Beyond that: I do not know the status of Mr. Mackenzie's legal
situation, or who he may have representing him; his charges in
Saskatchewan were stayed earlier this year. I dont' have any further
knowledge of his legal situation beyond that.
Here is an article re: the charges being stayed. (I did not write
this/I did not attend this hearing, so cannot answer questions beyond
the information in this article.)
https://thestarphoenix.com/new
Sask. charges stayed against Jeremy Mackenzie, founder of far-right 'Diagolon'
Jeremy Mackenzie of Nova Scotia no longer faces charges in
Saskatchewan stemming from a November 2021 incident in the RM of
Viscount.
thestarphoenix.com
BRYN LEVY
REPORTER/WEB EDITOR
Saskatoon StarPhoenix
T: 1.306.657.6406
C: 1.639.471.3542
204 5th Avenue N
Saskatoon, SK S7K 2P1
blevy@postmedia.com
Thank you for your email
Premier
<PREMIER@novascotia.ca> Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 2:31 PM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Thank you for your email to Premier Houston. This is an automatic
confirmation your message has been received.
As we are currently experiencing higher than normal volumes of
correspondence, there may be delays in the response time for
correspondence identified as requiring a response.
If you are looking for the most up-to-date information from the
Government of Nova Scotia please visit: http://novascotia.ca
Thank you,
Premier’s Correspondence Team
Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada
<mcu@justice.gc.ca> Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 2:31 PM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Arif Virani, Minister of
Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please
note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured
that your message will be carefully reviewed.
We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.
-------------------
Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable Arif Virani, ministre de la Justice
et procureur général du Canada.
En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
avec soin.
Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.
David Amos
<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
To: ragingdissident@protonmail.com
<motomaniac333@gmail.com>, blevy@postmedia.com, rick@fodalaw.com
Cc: "pierre.poilievre" <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, pm
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Michael.Duheme"
<Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2022 14:32:24 -0400
Subject: I just called Jeremy Mackenzie’s number 639 318 9073 and left
a voicemail then spoke briefly with his lawye Mr Foda correct?
To: ragingdissident@protonmail.com
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, blevy@postmedia.com,
rick@fodalaw.com
https://www.google.com/search?
Diagolon leader Jeremy Mackenzie to challenge decision denying him bail
Bryn Levy | Posted: Oct. 28, 2022, 10:49 a.m.
Jeremy MacKenzie, the founder of the online group “Diagolon” was
arrested in September 2022 in Cole Harbour, N.S., on a Canada-wide
warrant related to charges stemming from an alleged Nov. 2021 assault
near Viscount, Sask.(Jeremy MacKenzie/Facebook)
Jeremy MacKenzie, the founder of the online group “Diagolon” was
arrested in September 2022 in Cole Harbour, N.S., on a Canada-wide
warrant related to charges stemming from an alleged Nov. 2021 assault
near Viscount, Sask. - Jeremy MacKenzie / Facebook
The leader of a Canadian far-right group is set to challenge a judge’s
decision to keep him in custody while awaiting trial.
Jeremy Mackenzie, 36, faces assault and weapons charges in connection
with an incident near Viscount, Sask. in November 2021.
He was denied bail on Oct. 7 by a Saskatoon provincial court judge.
The reasons for that decision are protected by a court-ordered
publication ban, which is a standard measure in most bail proceedings
meant to protect an accused’s right to a fair trial.
Mackenzie’s previous defence lawyer was granted leave to withdraw on
Oct. 13, after telling court he’d been fired.
At Thursday’s hearing, Toronto-based defence lawyer Sherif Foda
indicated he will represent Mackenzie, and that his client will seek a
review of the Oct. 7 bail decision. Mackenzie is due back in court
Nov. 10.
Court previously heard there is an ongoing investigation into how
audio recordings from Mackenzie’s bail hearing found their way online
in violation of the publication ban — an offence punishable by up to
two years in jail and a $5,000 fine.
Mackenzie is the self-proclaimed leader of Diagolon, a group described
in a 2022 House of Commons report as a violent extremist organization.
Its name refers to a fictional country comprised of provinces and
states without COVID-19 mandates, forming a diagonal line across North
America.
He is also charged with harassment and intimidation in connection with
an anti-mask protest outside the home of Nova Scotia’s chief medical
health officer in March, and faces 13 firearm-related charges in Nova
Scotia after a police search in January.
RCMP have said they are also reviewing an allegation that Mackenzie
made rape threats against Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre’s wife
during a livestream video in September.
There has also been suggestion of a link between Diagolon and the case
of four men charged with conspiracy to commit murder after a February
RCMP raid against an anti-mandate blockade of a Canada-U.S. border
crossing at Coutts, Alta.
Mounties reported seizing items including 13 long guns, handguns, a
machete, a large quantity of ammunition and body armour. A tactical
vest seized at the scene had a Diagolon patch on it — a white diagonal
line across a black rectangle. The four suspects are scheduled for
trial in 2023.
With Canadian Press files
https://www.sherif-foda.com/
Sherif M. Foda is a criminal defence lawyer who fights for his
clients. His work largely consists of complex crimes, with an emphasis
on large-scale project prosecutions for drug, gun, and violent
offences. He regularly defends people alleged to have ties with
criminal organizations, and conducts both trials and appeals at all
levels of court in Canada.
Sherif also practices regulatory law, having represented people
charged with various provincial offences. He has both represented
professionals and worked in an advisory capacity in cases under the
Securities Act, the Regulated Health Professions Act, the Ontario
College of Trades and Apprenticeship Act, and other regulatory and
quasi-criminal statutes.
Sherif attended law school at the University of Ottawa where he was an
international moot court competition champion. After graduating law
school as silver medalist, Sherif was awarded the Canadian Bar
Association’s Viscount Bennett fellowship. He used that to pursue a
Master’s in Law and Finance at the University of Oxford, where he
graduated with Distinction. He then articled at McCarthy Tetrault in
Montreal, followed by a clerkship at the Supreme Court of Canada with
Justice Cromwell.
Sherif is called to the bar in Quebec, Ontario, and New York. His
practice has been located in the Greater Toronto Area since 2014. He
serves his clients in English, French, and Arabic.
Sherif M. Foda
171 John Street - Suite 101,
Toronto, ON, M5T 1X3
Tel: 416.642.1438
Email: sherif@fodalaw.com
RE Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act and Freeland defending her
liberal democracy byway of her bankster buddies
Thank you for your email
Premier
<PREMIER@novascotia.ca> Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 2:38 PM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Thank you for your email to Premier Houston. This is an automatic
confirmation your message has been received.
As we are currently experiencing higher than normal volumes of
correspondence, there may be delays in the response time for
correspondence identified as requiring a response.
If you are looking for the most up-to-date information from the
Government of Nova Scotia please visit: http://novascotia.ca
Thank you,
Premier’s Correspondence Team
Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada
<mcu@justice.gc.ca> Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 2:38 PM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Arif Virani, Minister of
Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please
note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured
that your message will be carefully reviewed.
We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.
-------------------
Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable Arif Virani, ministre de la Justice
et procureur général du Canada.
En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
avec soin.
Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.
David Amos
<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
To: ragingdissident@protonmail.com
<motomaniac333@gmail.com>, blevy@postmedia.com, "rick@fodalaw.com
\"pierre.poilievre\"" <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Michael.Duheme"
<Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
David Amos
<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
To: "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino"
<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, "David.Lametti"
<David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, "Marc.Miller" <Marc.Miller@parl.gc.ca>,
mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Diane.Lebouthillier"
<Diane.Lebouthillier@parl.gc.c
<Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.g
michael.mcleod@parl.gc.ca, brendan.hanley@parl.gc.ca, "niki.ashton"
<niki.ashton@parl.gc.ca>, "Candice.Bergen"
<Candice.Bergen@parl.gc.ca>, "kevin.lamoureux"
<kevin.lamoureux@parl.gc.ca>, "Daniel.Blaikie"
<Daniel.Blaikie@parl.gc.ca>, "Terry.Duguid" <Terry.Duguid@parl.gc.ca>,
"Marty.Morantz" <Marty.Morantz@parl.gc.ca>, "ted.falk"
<ted.falk@parl.gc.ca>, larry.maguire@parl.gc.ca, "Leah.Gazan"
<Leah.Gazan@parl.gc.ca>, "Raquel.Dancho" <Raquel.Dancho@parl.gc.ca>,
Dan.Mazier@parl.gc.ca, "Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>,
"mary.ng" <mary.ng@parl.gc.ca>, Yves-Francois.Blanchet@parl.gc
"Rheal.Fortin" <Rheal.Fortin@parl.gc.ca>, "Luc.Desilets"
<Luc.Desilets@parl.gc.ca>, "Sebastien.Lemire"
<Sebastien.Lemire@parl.gc.ca>, "Luc.Theriault"
<Luc.Theriault@parl.gc.ca>, "Denis.Trudel" <Denis.Trudel@parl.gc.ca>,
"Mario.Dion" <Mario.Dion@cie.parl.gc.ca>, "Mario.Simard"
<Mario.Simard@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Viva Frei
<david@vivafrei.com>, "macpherson.don"
<macpherson.don@dailygleaner.c
"Catherine.Tait" <Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca>, "Chuck.Thompson"
<Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>, "sylvie.gadoury"
<sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.c
<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>,
andrew <andrew@frankmagazine.ca>
https://davidraymondamos3.blog
Saturday, 19 February 2022
Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act and Freeland defending her liberal
democracy byway of her bankster buddies
Deja Vu Anyone???
https://www.facebook.com/lizk
https://www.facebook.com/iAmJa
Jacob Bustin ·
What a wild moment in time, the RCMP should be ashamed. There I am
armed with a camera and flowers,
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 14:52:12 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act
To: clifford.small@parl.gc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
https://www.cbc.ca/news/polit
Freeland defends arrests of protesters, says Canada's democracy and
economy are under threat
MPs had been scheduled to debate the Emergencies Act from 7 a.m. to midnight ET
Catharine Tunney · CBC News · Posted: Feb 18, 2022 6:59 AM ET
Police move in on protesters in Ottawa
6 hours ago
Live
Join CBC News live for special coverage as police in Ottawa force
anti-vaccine mandate protesters to leave the downtown area.. 0:00
Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland defended her government's
decision to invoke the emergency powers now being used to clear
downtown Ottawa, saying Canada's economy and democracy are being
threatened.
"A liberal democracy must be prepared to defend itself," she told a
news conference Friday as police continued to take into custody
protesters demanding the elimination of all pandemic measures who have
gridlocked the capital city for nearly three weeks.
The federal government triggered the Emergencies Act earlier this week
for the first time in the legislation's history. It brought in new
measures prohibiting public assemblies that disrupt the movement of
people, goods and trade, or that support the "threat or use of acts of
serious violence against persons or property."
In a dramatic show of force, a line of police officers — some armed
with weapons, face shields and gas masks — has been moving along
Rideau Street, pushing protesters west and making arrests along the
way.
Police started arresting protesters and towing trucks on Friday as
part of an operation to end a three-week blockade of Ottawa by
hundreds of truck drivers that paralyzed the nation's capital and
prompted the prime minister to invoke emergency powers. (Evan
Mitsui/CBC)
1 of 20
As of 3:53 p.m. ET, police had taken 70 people into custody and towed
21 vehicles.
At one point, officers smashed the window of an orange vehicle and
arrested the occupant after he locked himself in.
Armoured tactical vehicles were spotted moving up Rideau — a major
downtown artery — with a group of mounted officers nearby.
"When this crisis is over, all of us will need to work hard to heal
our country," Freeland told the news conference.
"But today, our economy and our democracy are facing a serious and
foreign-funded threat. These illegal blockades and occupation cannot
be allowed to usurp the authority of democratically elected
governments."
Some of the protesters on the streets linked arms and sang the
national anthem. Others sat down or kneeled on the ground, refusing to
move.
"Hold the line," some chanted.
Live
Police arrest protesters in operation to end 3-week Ottawa occupation
Analysis
It's no sledgehammer — but for Trudeau, the Emergencies Act could
turn out to be just as heavy
On Wellington Street, home of the National War Memorial and Parliament
Hill, protesters used shovels and orange and white pylons to build up
a wall of snow.
"You will face severe penalties if you do not cease further unlawful
activity and remove your vehicle and/or property immediately from all
unlawful protest sites," Ottawa police tweeted Friday morning.
Freeland said she takes no satisfaction in seeing the arrests.
"For me this is a day of real sorrow, but also determination," she said.
"And it is a day, I think, where everyone in our government is very resolute."
WATCH | 'It's painful for me that this is happening in Canada,' says Freeland
Freeland: 'It's painful for me that this is happening in Canada'
7 hours ago
Duration 1:36
Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland says the protests now being
cleared from Ottawa's streets are attempting to undermine Canada's
democracy and economy. 1:36
The government published its reasons for triggering the Emergencies
Act late Wednesday, calling the situation across the country
"concerning, volatile and unpredictable."
"The protesters have varying ideological grievances, with demands
ranging from an end to all public health restrictions to the overthrow
of the elected government," the government statement reads.
"Ideologically motivated violent extremism adherents may feel
empowered by the level of disorder resulting from the protests."
The statement also said border blockades threaten Canada's economic security.
"The impact on important trade corridors and the risk to the
reputation of Canada as a stable, predictable and reliable location
for investment may be jeopardized if disruptions continue," it reads.
For six days last week, protesters blocked access to the Ambassador
Bridge which connects Windsor and Detroit. The vital trade link was
reopened to traffic on Sunday after police moved in.
On Friday, an Ontario judge granted an extension to the injunction
that prohibits anyone from blocking access to the Ambassador Bridge.
The previous order was set to expire Monday.
Debate delayed
A debate in the House of Commons on the government's controversial
decision to invoke the Emergencies Act has been temporarily suspended
as the police operation continues on the parliamentary precinct's
doorstep.
House leaders previously reached a deal to debate the use of the
Emergencies Act on Friday and throughout the weekend, from 7 a.m. ET
to midnight, with a vote planned for Monday.
The extraordinary powers provided by the legislation have been in
effect since Monday, but the Emergencies Act stipulates that the
federal government also must go before Parliament to seek approval
from MPs and senators.
Government House Leader Mark Holland tweeted that he hopes the debate
can resume Saturday.
"We are closely monitoring the police operation in downtown Ottawa
today and will await further advice from security officials on
Parliament Hill on when the House can reopen," he wrote.
WATCH | A timeline of the convoy protest that has paralyzed downtown Ottawa:
From convoy to encampment to arrests | Protest timeline
15 hours ago
Duration 3:10
Protesters have shut down border crossings and paralyzed downtown
Ottawa over the past three weeks. Here's how they got there and how it
might end. 3:10
A note sent to senators on Friday morning asks them to stay away from
the downtown core.
The Conservatives have argued the government has not backed up its
claim that the demonstrations pose a serious threat to Canada and
can't be dealt with through existing laws.
"We want to lower the temperature across the country. The prime
minister clearly wants to raise it," interim Conservative leader
Candice Bergen said in the House Thursday.
"This is not a game. It comes at the cost to Canadians' rights and freedoms."
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) announced Thursday
that it plans to sue the federal government over its decision to
invoke the Emergencies Act.
"Emergency powers cannot and must not be normalized," said CCLA
executive director Noa Mendelsohn.
NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh said his party plans to support the
Emergencies Act declaration — which would carry it through the
minority Parliament — but is ready to pull its support if the measures
are no longer necessary or if the government takes on additional
powers.
"This is not a protest. It is not peaceful," Singh said during
Thursday's debate.
"The organizers of this illegal occupation have been clear from the
beginning. They came here to overthrow a democratically elected
government."
Downtown Ottawa locked down
Interim Ottawa police chief Steve Bell said the Emergencies Act and
the provincial state of emergency provided police with the resources
they needed to push back and end the demonstration.
"The three levels of government that have come together to support our
efforts in this have led us to be able to have the success we're
starting to see right now," he said Friday.
"Without the authorities provided to us through these pieces of
legislation, we wouldn't be able to be doing the work we are today."
Ottawa's downtown core remains locked down Friday morning, with about
100 checkpoints preventing protesters from entering the zone.
They act also prohibit people from bringing minors near unlawful
assemblies and authorize banks and insurance companies to freeze
participants' accounts and cancel their vehicle insurance.
On Friday, police escorted at least one tearful family with
school-aged children away from the scene.
Canadian Civil Liberties Association to sue federal government
over Emergencies Act
Truckers say they'll face arrests peacefully — but will defend their rights
On Thursday, police arrested Chris Barber and Tamara Lich, key
organizers of the protest convoy that began as a demonstration against
vaccine mandates and other pandemic restrictions.
Both are expected to make court appearances on Friday.
According to police, Barber is charged with counselling to commit the
offence of mischief, counselling to commit the offence of disobeying a
court order and counselling to commit the offence of obstructing
police.
Lich has been charged with counselling to commit the offence of
mischief, police said.
CBC News has confirmed another of the convoy leaders, Pat King, was
among those arrested Friday.
CBC special coverage
News and analysis will continue on CBC News Network with Power &
Politics and Canada Tonight, and on The World at 6 on CBC Radio One
and the CBC Listen app.
Watch The National starting at 9 p.m. ET on CBC News Network for
the latest news and analysis.
And follow cbcnews.ca for breaking news, analysis and updates.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Catharine Tunney
Reporter
Catharine Tunney is a reporter with CBC's Parliamentary bureau in
Ottawa. She previously worked at CBC in Nova Scotia. She can be
reached at catharine.tunney@cbc.ca or @cattunneyCBC.
Twitter: @cattunneycbc
With files from J.P. Tasker and Nick Boisvert
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 14:52:12 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act
To: clifford.small@parl.gc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
https://www.bitchute.com/video
February 14 Brian Peckford Presser - Complete
First published at 19:11 UTC on February 15th, 2022.
#BrianPeckford #TamaraLich
Live with Laura-Lynn
Laura-Lynn
11917 subscribers
February 14 Brian Peckford Presser - Complete
All of my content is completely, 100% viewer supported and funded.
Thank you for your kindness and generosity to keep information like
this coming!
https://www.bitchute.com/video
TBOF’s Press Conference in Response To Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act
Live with Laura-Lynn
Laura-Lynn
11917 subscribers
TBOF’s Press Conference in Response To Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act
All of my content is completely, 100% viewer supported and funded.
Thank you for your kindness and generosity to keep information like
this coming!
“Fear is the Virus” T-Shirts:…
https://westernstandardonline.
Alberta lawyer files complaint against Pfizer
The statement says the US FDA briefing “fraudulently and misleadingly
does not discuss or acknowledge any other potential causes of death.”
mm
Published 3 months ago
on November 19, 2021
By Melanie Risdon
https://www.facebook.com/there
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 02:23:48 -0400
Subject: Now that David Lametti has quit public service perhaps he
will explain one of my old blogs to Vincent Gircys and his lawyers EH
Chrystia Freeland?
To: Vincent.gircys@gmail.com, prontoman1@protonmail.com,
senseirude@hotmail.com, newsnotnoise@protonmail.com,
Chidakash@protonmail.com, paulajtucci@gmail.com,
Tom@icareinsurance.ca, educatorsforhumanrights@proton
nancyobee@protonmail.com, vickie@vaccinechoicecanada.com
gisele@vaccinechoicecanada.com
anyakreynes@gmail.com, Shirley.guertin@protonmail.com
alanbrough@prontonmail.com, sciencej@protonmail.com, dione@librti.com,
roman@librti.com, drpierremilot@protonmail.com, mcu
<mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino" <Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>,
"fin.minfinance-financemin.fin
<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin
"pierre.poilievre" <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, kingpatrick278
<kingpatrick278@gmail.com>, "Michael.Duheme"
<Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
ngroot@investigationcounsel.co
bkofman@ksvadvisory.com, info@nationalcitizensinquiry.c
<jcarpay@jccf.ca>, "jagmeet.singh" <jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>,
media.medias@fintrac-canafe.gc
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.ab.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, Office of the
Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.bc.ca>, jcooper@torontolegalresearch.c
ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca, czwibel@ccla.org,
contact@fedsforfreedom.ca, ian <ian@mccuaiglaw.ca>,
mjackson@fieldlaw.com, "freedomreport.ca"
<freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>, chris.scott@whistlestoptruckst
sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, "stefanos.karatopis"
<stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com>
<David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, waynenarvey@hotmail.com,
dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com
Cc: LGrey@gwsllp.ca, info@lawyers4truth.ca, brianpeckford@gmail.com,
ted@vaccinechoicecanada.com, alanjm@idirect.com,
benitapedersen@hotmail.com, KMartin@postmedia.com
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Power Play: David Lametti speaks on resignation
CTV News
1.26M subscribers
16,793 views Jan 25, 2024
Liberal MP David Lametti says he’s leaving politics for a job at the
Fasken Martineau DuMoulin law firm.
300 Comments
David Amos
@davidamos7114
5 days ago
Methinks the Fasken Martineau DuMoulin law firm would not be wise to
make this dude a partner N'esy Pas?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Lametti, David - M.P." <David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 21:08:18 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) Office of Inspector General cannot perform SEC operating
responsibilities, such as investigation of alleged securities law
violations.
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Bonjour,
Merci d'avoir communiqué avec le bureau de circonscription de
l'honorable David Lametti, député de LaSalle-Émard-Verdun. Ceci est un
message automatisé confirmant que nous recevons votre courriel.
Afin de recevoir une réponse dans les meilleurs délais, assurez-vous
d'inclure votre nom au complet, votre adresse résidentielle et votre
code postal dans tous les courriels. Toutes les correspondances sont
lues et examinées, mais nous ne répondrons qu’aux correspondances
provenant de LaSalle-Émard-Verdun.
Si vous désirez contacter le bureau du Ministre de la Justice et
procureur général du Canada, veuillez adresser votre correspondance à
: mcu@justice.gc.ca<mailto:mcu@j
Pour obtenir les dernières informations, suivre les développements,
connaître les nouvelles mesures et les dernières directives concernant
la COVID-19, nous vous invitons à consulter les sites suivants :
Notre site-web : https://davidlametti.libparl.c
Gouvernement du Canada :
https://www.canada.ca/fr/sante
Gouvernement du Québec :
https://www.quebec.ca/sante/pr
Santé publique de la ville de Montréal :
https://santemontreal.qc.ca/po
Organisation mondiale de la santé:
https://www.who.int/fr/emergen
Encore une fois, merci d'avoir contacté notre bureau.
Bureau de l'honorable David Lametti, C.P. député de LaSalle-Émard-Verdun
------
Good day,
Thank you for contacting the constituency office of the Honourable
David Lametti, Member of Parliament for LaSalle-Émard-Verdun. This is
an automated message to acknowledge that we have received your email.
In order to receive the most timely response, please be sure to
include your full name, home address and postal code on all emails.
All correspondence is read and reviewed, however only correspondence
from inside LaSalle-Émard-Verdun may receive a direct response.
If you wish to contact the Minister's office, please address your
correspondence to: mcu@justice.gc.ca<mailto:mcu@j
To get the latest information, follow developments and/or learn about
new measures and directives concerning COVID-19, we invite you to
consult these links:
Our website : https://davidlametti.libparl.c
Government of Canada :
https://www.canada.ca/en/publi
Government of Québec :
https://www.quebec.ca/en/healt
Public Health for the City de Montreal :
https://santemontreal.qc.ca/en
World Health Organization:
https://www.who.int/emergencie
Once again, thank you for reaching out to our office.
Office of the Honourable David Lametti, P.C., M.P. LaSalle-Émard-Verdun
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Chrystia Freeland <Chrystia.Freeland@fin.gc.ca>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 23:05:02 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Vincent Gircys Do you understand me now?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
https://davidraymondamos3.blog
Saturday, 19 February 2022
Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act and Freeland defending her liberal
democracy byway of her bankster buddies
Deja Vu Anyone???
---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" <minfinance-financemin@fin.gc.
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2022 05:45:46 +0000
Subject: Department of Finance / Ministère des Finances
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Due to the evolving COVID-19 situation, we apologize in advance for
any delay in responding to your enquiry. In the meantime, information
on Canada’s COVID-19 Economic Response Plan is available on the
Government of Canada website at
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http
or by calling 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) or 1-833-784-4397.
Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
En raison de la fluidité de la crise de la COVID-19, il est possible
que nous retardions à vous répondre et nous nous en excusons.
Entre-temps, les informations au sujet du Plan d’intervention
économique du Canada pour répondre à la COVID-19 sont disponibles dans
le site Web du gouvernement du Canada au
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http
ou en composant le 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) ou le
1-833-784-4397.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Lantsman, Melissa - M.P." <melissa.lantsman@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2022 05:43:21 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act and
Freeland defending her liberal democracy byway of her bankster buddies
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Hello,
We have received your email message. Thank you very much for contacting us.
Our office receives hundreds of emails each week, and each one is
important to us. Priority will be given to residents of the Thornhill
riding.
For constituents of Thornhill, if your email did not include your full
mailing address (postal address), please get back to us and provide
that information. Please note, we are unable to respond to form
emails.
For media requests please email braydon.wilson.504@parl.gc.ca
We will review your message, and seek to get back to you as soon as possible.
If you wish to call our office to follow up on your email, our
Community Office can be reached at 905-886-9911.
Thank you once again.
Sincerely,
Melissa Lantsman
Member of Parliament for Thornhill
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Long, Wayne - M.P." <Wayne.Long@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2022 05:43:21 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act and
Freeland defending her liberal democracy byway of her bankster buddies
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Hi there,
Thanks for taking the time to reach out. This aknowledgment is to
confirm that your email has been received, and my team will get back
to you as soon as possible.
All the best,
Wayne Long
Member of Parliament | Saint John-Rothesay
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Mendicino, Marco - M.P." <Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 02:39:30 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act and
Freeland defending her liberal democracy byway of her bankster buddies
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Thank you for contacting the constituency office of the Hon. Marco
Mendicino, P.C., M.P. for Eglinton—Lawrence.
Please be advised that our office has the capacity to assist with
requests within Eglinton—Lawrence only and we prioritize
correspondence from residents.
If you reside outside the riding and require assistance, you can
contact your local Member of Parliament by entering your postal code
here: https://www.ourcommons.ca/memb
If you are a resident of Eglinton—Lawrence and require assistance
continue reading below.
· For assistance with casework, we require your full name,
phone number, address and postal code to proceed.
· For non-ministerial meeting requests, we need to know
the nature of the meeting and we will respond back with possible
options.
· For media requests, the Press Secretary will get back to you.
To contact Public Safety Canada directly, please visit:
https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca
To contact Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada directly,
please email minister@cic.gc.ca or phone 613-954-1064.
For assistance with the situation in Afghanistan, please continue reading.
If you and your family require assistance regarding the rapidly
evolving situation in Afghanistan, detailed information on Canada’s
special measures to support Afghan nationals is available here:
https://www.canada.ca/en/immig
For Afghans who assisted the Government of Canada, please contact:
Canada-Afghanistan@internation
For questions on how Afghan nationals may reunite with their families
in Canada, or information on the humanitarian program to resettle
Afghans outside of Afghanistan, please contact:
IRCC.SituationAfghanistan.IRCC
You may also call 1-613-321-4243 from Monday to Friday, 6:30 a.m. to 7
p.m. (ET).
For Canadians in need of consular assistance in Afghanistan, please
contact Global Affairs Canada’s 24/7 Emergency Watch and Response
Centre in Ottawa at:
· Phone: 613-996-8885
· Email: sos@international.gc.ca
· SMS: 613-686-3658
https://davidraymondamos3.blog
Thursday 1 February 2024
Freedom Convoy Class Action
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 18:52:15 -0400
Subject: Re: Announcement from Vincent Gircys.
To: Vincent.gircys@gmail.com, prontoman1@protonmail.com,
senseirude@hotmail.com, newsnotnoise@protonmail.com,
Chidakash@protonmail.com, paulajtucci@gmail.com,
Tom@icareinsurance.ca, educatorsforhumanrights@proton
nancyobee@protonmail.com, vickie@vaccinechoicecanada.com
gisele@vaccinechoicecanada.com
anyakreynes@gmail.com, Shirley.guertin@protonmail.com
alanbrough@prontonmail.com, sciencej@protonmail.com, dione@librti.com,
roman@librti.com, drpierremilot@protonmail.com, mcu
<mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino" <Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>,
"fin.minfinance-financemin.fin
<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin
"pierre.poilievre" <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, kingpatrick278
<kingpatrick278@gmail.com>, "Michael.Duheme"
<Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
ngroot@investigationcounsel.co
bkofman@ksvadvisory.com, info@nationalcitizensinquiry.c
<jcarpay@jccf.ca>, "jagmeet.singh" <jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>,
media.medias@fintrac-canafe.gc
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.ab.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, Office of the
Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.bc.ca>, jcooper@torontolegalresearch.c
ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca, czwibel@ccla.org,
contact@fedsforfreedom.ca, ian <ian@mccuaiglaw.ca>,
mjackson@fieldlaw.com, "freedomreport.ca"
<freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>, chris.scott@whistlestoptruckst
sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, "stefanos.karatopis"
<stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com>
<David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: LGrey@gwsllp.ca, info@lawyers4truth.ca, brianpeckford@gmail.com,
ted@vaccinechoicecanada.com, alanjm@idirect.com,
benitapedersen@hotmail.com, KMartin@postmedia.com
https://rumble.com/v4a92j0-cla
Class Action w/ Vincent Gircys
The Lavigne Show
2.61K followers
Streamed on: Jan 30, 8:00 am EST
https://rumble.com/v49a1pu-wak
Wake-up Alberta! w/ Pat King & Vincent Gircys
The Lavigne Show
2.61K followers
Streamed on:
Jan 25, 6:00 pm EST
It’s time Alberta, wake-up!
Vincent Gircys, one of two plaintiffs from the Federal Court decision
that declared the use of the EA unlawful.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 12:46:09 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Hey Higgy perhaps you or Brian Peckford or Derek Sloan’s
Yankee pal Roger Stone can explain to Leighton Grey QC and the FEDS
FOR FREEDOM etc why I sued the Queen in 2015
To: jcooper@torontolegalresearch.c
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
https://www.facebook.com/derek
Freedom Report Final Show James Cooper and More
James Cooper is a lawyer out of r8chmond Ontario. He has vowed to make
all health ministers accountable for their part in this pandemic. Find
out more live at Freedom Report.
Final Show
special guests
Chris Sky
Danny DeSantis
Michael Arana
Anti-Maskers Club
April Lajune
If you enjoy the content we bring, please help us out with a couple of
bucks. Help us to keep the show going, Donate Today!
We Accept interact e-transfer @ derekstorie85@gmail.com
https://selfreplawyer.ca/about
A Legal Professional Helping You With Your Litigation Needs
James Cooper, a GTA-based lawyer, specializes in the provision of
unbundled legal services (legal research, drafting of pleadings,
motions, affidavits, factums, settlement negotiations, court
appearances, etc.) in respect of any and all litigation matters. He
has devised winning strategies and legal arguments for lawyers, law
firms, and members of the public across the Greater Toronto Area and
throughout the Province of Ontario. Mr. Cooper has sought to educate
law firms and mediators toward taking a more evidence-focused approach
in the application of case law research, as a means of "war-gaming" a
client's prospects for success or failure in any given legal action.
Mr. Cooper is also a member of Self-Rep Navigators, a group of lawyers
with a common interest in assisting self-represented litigants.
Mr. Cooper is an experienced lecturer and instructor, having conducted
Law Society CPD accredited presentations on the subject of Legal
Research and Practice Management.
He offers a free initial phone consultation and quote for his
unbundled legal services, with flexible retainer arrangements
customized to a client's budget.
https://calgaryherald.com/news
Anti-vaxxer Kevin J. Johnston sentenced to time served for attempt to
flee to U.S. after skipping out on Calgary jail sentence
Johnston, 50, pleaded guilty to being unlawfully at large for failing
to show up to complete a weekends-only jail term
Author of the article:
Kevin Martin
Publishing date:
Mar 08, 2022
Kevin J. Johnston Photo by Postmedia
One-time fugitive Kevin J. Johnston was handed the equivalent of a
30-day jail term Tuesday for his ill-fated flight from Canadian
justice in January.
Johnston, 50, pleaded guilty to being unlawfully at large for failing
to show up to complete a weekends-only jail term after being convicted
of contempt of court for ignoring orders he comply with COVID-19
restrictions.
Crown prosecutor Peter Mackenzie told provincial court Judge Harry Van
Harten that Johnston was supposed to show up at the Calgary
Correctional Centre on Dec. 24 to complete the final weekend of the
40-day sentence handed him by Justice Adam Germain.
Mackenzie said Johnston was arrested Jan. 4 after illegally crossing
into the U.S. near the Montana/North Dakota border.
Both Mackenzie and Toronto defence lawyer Ian McCuaig, who appeared
via video link, agreed a 30-day sentence was warranted.
But McCuaig argued the remand time Johnston served before he was
granted bail, the equivalent of 17 days when given enhanced credit,
coupled with his onerous bail conditions that were equivalent to house
arrest, should result in a sentence of time served.
Mackenzie argued only Johnston’s jail time should be counted and Van
Harten should order the former fringe mayoral candidate to serve
another 13 days, but the judge agreed with McCuaig’s argument.
At one point Van Harten questioned Johnston on whether he’d been
vaccinated and whether he should consider more jail time if he wasn’t,
but after a brief adjournment and consultation between the offender
and McCuaig, the judge didn’t pursue the issue further.
After Johnston’s Jan. 4 arrest, he issued a statement through his
lawyer indicating he went to the U.S. because he was fleeing
persecution by the Canadian government.
The same day Johnston was arrested in the U.S. he was supposed to
appear at a Toronto courthouse to turn himself in to begin serving an
18-month sentence for contempt of court there.
KMartin@postmedia.com
Twitter: @KMartinCourts
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Sun, 22 May 2022 16:16:14 -0300
Subject: Hey Higgy perhaps you or Brian Peckford or Derek Sloan’s
Yankee pal Roger Stone can explain to Leighton Grey QC and the FEDS
FOR FREEDOM etc why I sued the Queen in 2015
To: Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, derekstorie85@gmail.com, cps
<cps@calgarypolice.ca>, ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca, "Kaycee.Madu"
<Kaycee.Madu@gov.ab.ca>, "hugh.flemming" <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>,
"Bill.Hogan" <Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Ian.Shugart"
<Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, jcarpay <jcarpay@jccf.ca>,
"jagmeet.singh" <jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, "robert.mckee"
<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, "andrea.anderson-mason"
<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>
<Anita.Anand@parl.gc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, Office of
the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, czwibel@ccla.org,
David.Aaron@justice.gc.ca, John.Provart@justice.gc.ca,
Nur.Muhammed-Ally@justice.gc.c
<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
mbublitz@lutheranchurch.ca, dhaberstock@lutheranchurch.ca,
rmohns@lutheranchurch.ca, president@lutheranchurch.ca, "wayne.eyre"
<wayne.eyre@forces.gc.ca>, "greg.byrne" <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>,
"Greta.Bossenmaier" <Greta.Bossenmaier@hq.nato.int
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, lgrey@gwsllp.ca,
contact@fedsforfreedom.ca, ian <ian@mccuaiglaw.ca>,
mjackson@fieldlaw.com, "freedomreport.ca"
<freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>, chris.scott@whistlestoptruckst
sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, "stefanos.karatopis"
<stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com>
"Lex deficere non potest Justitia exhibenda" ???? YEA RIGHT
How about the Motto of my Clan Veritas Vincit
Go figue why I am enjoyng this nonsense
Court File No. T-382-22
FEDERAL COURT
B E T W E E N:
JEREMIAH JOST, EDWARD CORNELL, VINCENT GIRCYS, and HAROLD
RISTAU
Applicants
and
GOVERNOR IN COUNCIL, HER MAJESTY IN RIGHT OF CANADA,
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA, and MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY
AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
Respondents
Go Figure why I find this rather comical
WRITTEN REPRESENTATION OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Motion to Strike
April 11, 2022
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Department of Justice Canada
Ontario Regional Office
National Litigation Sector
120 Adelaide Street West, Suite 400
Toronto, ON M5H 1T1
Fax: (416) 973-0809
David Aaron / John Provart / Nur Muhammed-Ally
Tel: (343) 804-9782 / (647) 256-0784 / (647) 256-0776
David.Aaron@justice.gc.ca / John.Provart@justice.gc.ca /
Nur.Muhammed-Ally@justice.gc.c
Recorded Entry Information : T-382-22
Type : Federal Court
Nature of Cause : S. 18.1 Application for Judicial Review
Office : Calgary Language : English
Type of Action : Federal Court
Filing Date : 2022-02-24
Recorded Entry Summary Information
Copies of public documents which are already in electronic format can
be sent by e-mail, upon request to the Registry:
fc_reception_cf@cas-satj.gc.ca
subject of your email. In the text, you must clearly identify the
document number and its name (this information is located in the
Recorded Entry Summary column).
52 records found
Doc Date Filed Office Recorded Entry Summary
24 2022-05-18 Toronto Solicitor's certificate of service on behalf of
Brenden Miller confirming service of Doc 23 upon Respondent by email
on 18-MAY-2022 filed on 18-MAY-2022
23 2022-05-18 Toronto Written Examination questions for Rebecca
Coleman filed on 18-MAY-2022
22 2022-05-18 Toronto Solicitor's certificate of service on behalf of
Denis Beaudoin confirming service of Doc 21 upon Respondent by email
on 18-MAY-2022 filed on 18-MAY-2022
21 2022-05-18 Toronto Written Examination questions of Denis Beaudoin
filed on 18-MAY-2022
20 2022-05-16 Toronto Solicitor's certificate of service on behalf of
Brenden Miller confirming service of Written examination questions
upon Respondent by email on 16-MAY-2022 filed on 16-MAY-2022
null 2022-05-16 Toronto Written examination questions received
on 16-MAY-2022
null 2022-05-09 Toronto Toronto 09-MAY-2022 BEFORE Martha Milczynski,
Prothonotary Language: E Before the Court: Case Management Conference
Result of Hearing: Parties discuss expert timelines held by way of
video conference Duration per day: 09-MAY-2022 from 11:00 to 11:40
Courtroom : Judge's Chambers - Toronto Court Registrar: Andrew Murray
Total Duration: 40min Appearances: Brenden Miller N/A representing
Applicant Jeff Anderson N/A representing Respondent Kathleen Kohlman
N/A representing Respondent Comments: Recorded on zoom cloud. The
parties discuss expert timelines. Minutes of Hearing entered in Vol.
1078 page(s) 227 - 228 Abstract of Hearing placed on file
null 2022-05-04 Toronto Copy of oral direction dated 04-MAY-2022
rendered by Martha Milczynski, Prothonotary placed on file. Original
filed on Court File No. T-306-22
null 2022-04-29 Toronto Copy of a letter on behalf of Respondent dated
28-APR-2022 placed on file on 29-APR-2022 Original placed on Court
File No. T-306-22
null 2022-04-28 Toronto Copy of a letter on behalf of Respondent dated
28-APR-2022 placed on file on 28-APR-2022 Original placed on Court
File No. T-306-22
null 2022-04-11 Toronto Toronto 11-APR-2022 BEFORE Martha Milczynski,
Prothonotary Language: E Before the Court: Case Management Conference
Result of Hearing: minutes found on T-306-22 held by way of video
conference Duration per day: 11-APR-2022 from 11:05 to 12:25 Courtroom
: Toronto (Zoom) Court Registrar: Shaun Nelson Total Duration: 1h
20min Appearances: Brenden Miller, Beth-Sheba van den Berg na
representing Applicant Kathleen Kohlman, Beth Tait na representing
Respondent Minutes of Hearing entered in Vol. 1078 page(s) 66 - 67
Abstract of Hearing placed on file
null 2022-04-25 Toronto Copy of a letter on behalf of Respondent dated
25-APR-2022 placed on file on 25-APR-2022 Original placed on Court
File No. T-306-22
null 2022-04-25 Toronto Letter from Applicant dated 22-APR-2022 This
letter provides the applicant's position on various matters received
on 25-APR-2022
null 2022-04-21 Toronto Copy of a letter on behalf of Respondent dated
21-APR-2022 placed on file on 21-APR-2022 Original placed on Court
File No. T-306-22
null 2022-04-20 Toronto Copy of a letter on behalf of Respondent dated
19-APR-2022 placed on file on 20-APR-2022 Original placed on Court
File No. T-306-22
null 2022-04-19 Toronto Copy of oral direction dated 19-APR-2022 dated
19-APR-2022 rendered by Martha Milczynski, Prothonotary placed on
file. Original filed on Court File No. T-306-22
null 2022-04-12 Toronto Copy of a letter on behalf of Respondent dated
12-APR-2022 placed on file on 12-APR-2022 Original placed on Court
File No. T-306-22
null 2022-04-12 Toronto Copy of Motion Record on behalf of Respondent
dated 12-APR-2022 placed on file on 12-APR-2022 Original filed on
Court File No. T-306-22
null 2022-04-12 Toronto Copy of Oral directions dated 12-APR-2022
dated 12-APR-2022 rendered by Martha Milczynski, Prothonotary placed
on file. Original filed on Court File No. T-306-22
19 2022-04-05 Toronto Solicitor's certificate of service on behalf of
Nur Muhammed Ally confirming service of Doc 18 upon Applicant by email
on 04-APR-2022 filed on 05-APR-2022
18 2022-04-05 Toronto Affidavit of Rebecca Coleman sworn on
04-APR-2022 contained within a Motion Record on behalf of Respondent
in opposition to Notice of Application Doc. No. 1 with Exhibits
A-RRRRR filed on 05-APR-2022
17 2022-04-04 Ottawa Affidavit of service of Kathleen
Kohlman sworn on
04-APR-2022 on behalf of Respondent confirming service of the
affidavit of Steven Shragge upon Applicant by e-mail on 04-APR-2022
with Exhibits A-D filed on 04-APR-2022
16 2022-04-04 Ottawa Affidavit of Steven Shragge sworn on 04-APR-2022
on behalf of Respondent in opposition to Notice of Application Doc.
No. 1 with Exhibits A-D filed on 04-APR-2022
15 2022-04-04 Ottawa Affidavit of Denis Beaudoin sworn on 04-APR-2022
on behalf of Respondent in opposition to Notice of Application Doc.
No. 1 with Exhibits A-D filed on 04-APR-2022
14 2022-04-04 Ottawa Solicitor's certificate of service on behalf of
Kathleen Kohlman confirming service of the Affidavit of Denis Beaudoin
upon Applicant by e-mail on 04-APR-2022 filed on 04-APR-2022
null 2022-04-04 Toronto Letter from Respondent dated 04-APR-2022 This
letter discuss the s. 39 certificate on T-306-22 and T-347-22 received
on 04-APR-2022
null 2022-04-01 Ottawa Letter from Respondents dated 01-APR-2022
"Please deliver this letter to the attention of Prothonotary
Milczynski concerning this proceeding." (see electronic document)
-sent to attention of CMJ(Milczynski,P) for consideration received on
01-APR-2022
null 2022-03-25 Toronto Toronto 25-MAR-2022 BEFORE Martha Milczynski,
Prothonotary Language: E Before the Court: Case Management Conference
Result of Hearing: Parties discuss r. 317 material held by way of
video conference Duration per day: 25-MAR-2022 from 11:00 to 11:32
Courtroom : Judge's Chambers - Toronto Court Registrar: Andrew Murray
Total Duration: 32min Appearances: Brenden Miller N/A representing
Applicant Beth-Sheba van den Berg N/A representing Applicant Kathleen
Kohlman N/A representing Respondent Beth Tait N/A representing
Respondent Comments: Recorded on zoom cloud. The parties discuss r.
317 material Minutes of Hearing entered in Vol. 1076 page(s) 354 - 355
Abstract of Hearing placed on file
null 2022-03-11 Toronto Toronto 11-MAR-2022 BEFORE Martha Milczynski,
Prothonotary Language: E Before the Court: Case Management Conference
Result of Hearing: minutes found on T-306-22 held by way of video
conference Duration per day: 11-MAR-2022 from 10:00 to 11:00 Courtroom
: Toronto (Zoom) Court Registrar: Shaun Nelson Total Duration: 1h
Appearances: Bath-Sheba van den Berg, Brenden Miller na representing
Applicant Kathleen Kohlman, Beth Tait na representing Respondent
Minutes of Hearing entered in Vol. 1076 page(s) 339 - 340 Abstract of
Hearing placed on file
null 2022-03-23 Toronto Oral directions received from the Court:
Martha Milczynski, Prothonotary dated 23-MAR-2022 directing that A
case management teleconference shall be conducted on Friday March 25,
2022 at 11am by Zoom. The purpose of the call is to discuss the Rule
317 requests, responses and next steps. If any party has anything to
add to the correspondence already submitted, they shall file their
submissions by 3pm March 24th." placed on file on 23-MAR-2022
Confirmed in writing to the party(ies)
null 2022-03-18 Toronto Letter from Applicant dated 17-MAR-2022 This
letter is in regards to the r. 317 submissions received on 18-MAR-2022
13 2022-03-14 Toronto Affidavit of service of Bethany DeWolfe sworn on
14-MAR-2022 on behalf of Applicant confirming service of Doc 12 upon
all parties by telecopier on 14-MAR-2022 with Exhibits A, B filed on
14-MAR-2022
12 2022-03-14 Toronto Notice of a constitutional question on behalf of
Applicant filed on 14-MAR-2022
null 2022-03-15 Ottawa Letter from Respondent dated 15-MAR-2022 AGC's
response to Rule 317 request, Encl. Certified Tribunal Record received
on 15-MAR-2022
null 2022-03-15 Ottawa ****** CANCELLED ****** Certified copy of
original material received from Privy Council Office on 15-MAR-2022
placed on file on this file
null 2022-03-11 Toronto Copy of Oral Direction dated 11-MAR-2022
rendered by Martha Milczynski, Prothonotary concerning Schedule placed
on file. Original filed on Court File No. T-306-22
11 2022-03-11 Toronto Solicitor's certificate of service on behalf of
Brenden Miller confirming service of Doc 10 upon Respondent by email
on 09-MAR-2022 filed on 11-MAR-2022
10 2022-03-11 Toronto Affidavit of Jermiah Jost sworn on 09-MAR-2022
on behalf of Applicant in support of Notice of Application Doc. No. 1
with Exhibits A-K filed on 11-MAR-2022
9 2022-03-09 Calgary Solicitor's certificate of service on behalf of
Brendan M. Miller confirming service of Affidavit of Edward Cornell,
Vincent Gircys, Harold Ristau upon Respondents by e-mail on
09-MAR-2022 filed on 09-MAR-2022
8 2022-03-09 Calgary Affidavit of Harold Ristau sworn on 09-MAR-2022
on behalf of Applicant in support of Notice of Application Doc. No. 1
with Exhibits A filed on 09-MAR-2022
7 2022-03-09 Calgary Affidavit of Vincent Gircys sworn on 08-MAR-2022
on behalf of Applicant in support of Notice of Application Doc. No. 1
with Exhibits A-D filed on 09-MAR-2022
6 2022-03-09 Calgary Affidavit of Edward Cornell sworn on 23-FEB-2022
on behalf of Applicant in support of Notice of Application Doc. No. 1
with Exhibits A-D filed on 09-MAR-2022
null 2022-03-10 Toronto Letter from Applicant dated 10-MAR-2022 This
letter discusses a possible motion being heard, and proposes a
schedule received on 10-MAR-2022
5 2022-03-02 Calgary Solicitor's certificate of service on behalf of
Brendan M. Miller confirming service of Notice of Application upon
Respondents by e-mail on 23-FEB-2022 filed on 02-MAR-2022
null 2022-03-02 Ottawa Acknowledgment of Receipt received from all
parties with respect to the Order of the Court dated february 24, 2022
placed on file on 02-MAR-2022
null 2022-03-01 Toronto Oral directions received from the Court:
Martha Milczynski, Prothonotary dated 01-MAR-2022 directing that
"Further to the case management teleconference conducted this day:
-the Respondent AG shall submit an update on any preliminary issues
including standing and mootness by March 2, 2022; -the AG's response
to the Rule 317 requests shall be delivered by March 15, 2022; -the
Applicants in T-382-22 shall serve and file their affidavits by noon
on March 10, 2022; and -the Respondent's affidavits shall b e served
and filed by April 4, 2022 -A case management teleconference in Court
files T-347-22 and T-382-22 shall be conducted on March 11, 2022
(together with T-306-22 and T-316-22, as previously scheduled) The
purpose of the call will be to discuss next steps, including any
preliminary motions regarding standing and mootness and the status of
the Rule 317 requests." placed on file on 01-MAR-2022 Confirmed in
writing to the party(ies)
null 2022-03-01 Toronto Toronto 01-MAR-2022 BEFORE Martha Milczynski,
Prothonotary Language: E Before the Court: Case Management Conference
Result of Hearing: Heard with T-347-22, parties discuss scheduling
held by way of video conference Duration per day: 01-MAR-2022 from
10:00 to 10:24 Courtroom : Judge's Chambers - Toronto Court Registrar:
Andrew Murray Total Duration: 24min Appearances: Bath-Sheba van den
Berg N/A representing Applicant Brenden Miller N/A representing
Applicant Kathleen Kohlman N/A representing Respondent Beth Tait N/A
representing Respondent Comments: Recorded on Zoom cloud, heard with
T-347-22. Parties discuss scheduling. Minutes of Hearing entered in
Vol. 1075 page(s) 272 - 273 Abstract of Hearing placed on file
4 2022-02-24 Calgary Solicitor's certificate of service on behalf of
Kathleen Kohlman confirming service of Notice of Appearance upon
Applicants by e-mail on 24-FEB-2022 filed on 24-FEB-2022
3 2022-02-24 Calgary Notice of appearance on behalf of Respondent
filed on 24-FEB-2022
2 2022-02-24 Ottawa Order dated 24-FEB-2022 rendered by
Chief Justice
Crampton Matter considered with personal appearance The Court's
decision is with regard to Order dated 24-FEB-2022 Result: "IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. This proceeding shall continue as a specially
managed proceeding. 2. Pursuant to Rule 383, Justice Richard G. Mosley
and Prothonotary Martha Milczynski are assigned as Case Management
Judges in this matter." Filed on 24-FEB-2022 entered in J. & O. Book,
volume 1528 page(s) 239 - 240 Interlocutory Decision
null 2022-02-24 Calgary Certified copy of Doc. 1 sent to Respondent
pursuant to Rule 133 of the Federal Courts Rules placed on file on
24-FEB-2022
1 2022-02-24 Calgary Notice of application and 2 copies
with regard to
Judicial Review (s.18) filed on 24-FEB-2022 Certified
copy(ies)/copy(ies) transmitted to Director of the Regional Office of
the Department of Justice Tariff fee of $50.00 received: yes
https://tbof.ca/about-us/vinc
About Us
Home » About Us
Taking Back Your Freedoms was initiated by a group of concerned
citizens with a specific goal to equip and to mobilize citizens
towards taking back their Constitutional and God given Freedoms.
Chairman Of The TBOF Board: Statesman Brian Peckford
Statesman Brian Peckford is the Former Premier of
Newfoundland-Labrador and he is the last living First Minister who
helped negotiate (with 12 other First Ministers of Canada) and sign
the Constitution of Canada to include the Canadian Charter of Rights
and Freedoms (1982).
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Leighton Grey <LGrey@gwsllp.ca>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2022 18:48:17 +0000
Subject: Re: Methinks YOU and many FEDS FOR FREEDOM cannot deny that I
crossed paths with their lawyer Leighton Grey QC just over a year ago
N'esy Pas Higgy??
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
This is a business email address, and you are not my client. I
therefore request that you please remove me from this thread. I would
prefer not to receive any further unsolicited emails.
Thanks,
“Lex deficere non potest Justitia exhibenda”
Leighton B. U. Grey, Q.C.
Senior Counsel
GWSLLP
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2022 18:07:57 +0000
Subject: RE: Hey Leighton Grey QC if that were remotely true then how
to you explain the FEDS FOR FREEDOM CEASE & DESIST BULLSHIT BEARING
YOUR SIGNATURE???
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.
If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.
Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.
Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
pour examen et considération.
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144 or by email
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswic
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel: premier@gnb.ca <mailto:premier@gnb.ca%20> /
premierministre@gnb.ca<mailto:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 15:58:56 -0400
Subject: Re: Remaining silent violated my conscience. I called again Correct?
To: Daniel@lionlaw.ca, LionAdvocacy@gmail.com,
info@nationalcitizensinquiry.c
Cc: ted@vaccinechoicecanada.com
https://rumble.com/v4apr6r-nci
NCI Lawsuits w/ Ken Drysdale, Leighton Grey, & Daniel Freiheit
The Lavigne Show
2.62K followers
Tune in to The Lavigne Show for an insightful episode titled "NCI
Lawsuits," where we delve into the legal ramifications of the National
Citizens Inquiry (NCI) report. Our guests, Ken Drysdale, a
commissioner for the NCI, and Leighton Grey, a distinguished member of
the King's Counsel and an experienced Albertan lawyer, bring their
unique perspectives to the table.
In this episode, we explore how the NCI report's findings influence
litigation across Alberta and Canada. Our guests will discuss the
potential of the NCI report as a tool for legal action, its
implications for future cases, and its role in shaping public policy
and healthcare decisions.
Ken Drysdale's insights as a commissioner will provide an inside look
at the intentions and depth of the NCI report, while Leighton Grey's
legal expertise will shed light on how these findings can be
effectively utilized in court. Whether you're interested in legal
strategies, public policy, or the broader impact of the NCI's work,
this episode promises a thorough analysis of these pivotal issues.
Special Guests:
Daniel Ari Freiheit, MBA, LLB.
@LionAdvocacy
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Leighton Grey <LGrey@gwsllp.ca>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2022 18:48:17 +0000
Subject: Re: Methinks YOU and many FEDS FOR FREEDOM cannot deny that I
crossed paths with their lawyer Leighton Grey QC just over a year ago
N'esy Pas Higgy??
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
This is a business email address, and you are not my client. I
therefore request that you please remove me from this thread. I would
prefer not to receive any further unsolicited emails.
Thanks,
“Lex deficere non potest Justitia exhibenda”
Leighton B. U. Grey, Q.C.
Senior Counsel
GWSLLP
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)" <Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2022 18:07:57 +0000
Subject: RE: Hey Leighton Grey QC if that were remotely true then how
to you explain the FEDS FOR FREEDOM CEASE & DESIST BULLSHIT BEARING
YOUR SIGNATURE???
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to write.
Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.
If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.
Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.
Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
pour examen et considération.
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144 or by email
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:med
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswic
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel: premier@gnb.ca <mailto:premier@gnb.ca%20> /
premierministre@gnb.ca<mailto:
National Citizens Inquiry: "Moving The NCI Forward"
National Citizens Inquiry
<info@nationalcitizensinquiry.
To: David Amos <David.Raymond.Amos333@gmail.c
View this email in your browser
This email was sent to David Amos (David.Raymond.Amos333@gmail.c
Logo
Moving the NCI Forward
A special message from the Chair of the NCI, Ted Kuntz
February 1, 2024
Dear Supporters of the National Citizens Inquiry,
The last four years have been a time of unprecedented overreach by
governments around the world. Canada has been at the forefront of
politicians, police and the courts unlawfully intruding in the lives
of Canadians.
The National Citizens Inquiry has proven to be a valuable instrument
in bringing forward the voices of Canadians harmed by government
measures, voices that have been actively censored by our governments,
media and public health.
The NCI Commissioners have served us well with a comprehensive Final
Report including recommendations to government and Canadian
institutions which is now being disseminated across the country. We
are very proud of the role everyday Canadians have had in the
development of this citizen-led and citizen funded institution.
Our reason for writing today is that the future of the NCI is being challenged.
What has been revealed in recent weeks is that there are interests
that do not want the National Citizens Inquiry to continue its efforts
of citizen-led accountability.
To provide some context, when the NCI was established the initial
board (called the Support Group) required a not-for-profit
organization to receive the funds donated to support the NCI. The
Support Group created ‘Citizens Inquiry Canada’ (CIC) for the express
purpose of receiving and distributing the funds donated to the
National Citizens Inquiry. At all times, the NCI management,
oversight, and control rested with the NCI Support Group.
To our surprise, in December 2023 David Ross and Ches Crosbie, whom
were appointed by the NCI Support Group to serve as directors of
Citizens Inquiry Canada, began to challenge the authority of the NCI
management team to make decisions pertaining to the operations and
future of the NCI.
The actions of the CIC directors escalated when notices were sent to
our staff from Ches Crosbie directing them not to follow the direction
of the NCI Support Group, and more importantly, to withhold access
codes to our social media, email and streaming accounts.
On January 10, 2024 the NCI Support Group received a letter from CIC
contracted lawyer Michael Collins purporting that the decision on the
future of the NCI was under the authority of Citizens Inquiry Canada.
What we are experiencing is an attempt by these individuals to take
control of the National Citizens Inquiry. Of note is that these
challenges to the authority of the Support Group only began following
a vote to remove David Ross as a Support Group member.
We are writing to inform you that the NCI Support Group remains
committed to continuing the NCI as an agent of citizen-led,
citizen-funded accountability of governments and others whom we expect
to act in the best interest of Canadians.
Here are some of the steps we’ve taken to address this attempt to
control the NCI:
Established a Federally registered not-for-profit corporation
under the name National Citizens Inquiry, with bylaws permitting the
ongoing mandate of the NCI.
Issued formal notice to the directors of Citizens Inquiry Canada
that their services are no longer required.
Demanded Citizens Inquiry Canada cease the receiving and spending
of NCI donor funds.
Prepared a formal request for the transfer of all remaining funds
donated to the NCI and held by Citizens Inquiry Canada to our new
not-for-profit.
All future donations via the website are being directed to the
National Citizens Inquiry.
The National Citizens Inquiry has appointed Ted Kuntz as Chair of the
NCI Support Group and National Citizens Inquiry Corporation.
Shawn Buckley has agreed to continue to serve as Lead Council and in a
leadership role in guiding the strategic direction of the NCI.
Mr. Crosbie and Mr. Ross have been removed from the NCI Support Group
and thus any statements by Mr. Crosbie or Mr. Ross that they represent
the National Citizens Inquiry are without merit.
At this time, postings on our now “former” social media accounts are
no longer under the control of the NCI and therefore do not represent
the National Citizens Inquiry. We encourage you to connect with our
new social media accounts listed below.
All of these efforts, and others, are necessary to secure the
independence and integrity of the NCI and the future of this important
citizen-led, citizen-funded initiative.
As disturbing as all of this has been, in the larger picture we view
these events as positive. We are now wiser and stronger, and able to
pursue new hearings and to disseminate the Commissioners Report in a
non-partisan manner, independent of outside influence. We hold that it
is our duty to continue the work of the National Citizens Inquiry.
We look forward to continuing our efforts to bring awareness,
accountability, and integrity to Canada. Our stated purpose is
important: “To support civil society efforts that recognize and uphold
the supremacy of God, the rule of law, public accountability, and
transparency.”
We request supporters of the NCI to re-register for our newsletters
and announcements by clicking this link:
https://nationalcitizensinquir
Please join us as we look toward new hearings and upholding these ideals.
In service,
Ted Kuntz, Chair
The National Citizens Inquiry
Feb1 Memorandum to Support Group concerning the CIC - Shawn Buckley (PDF, 5mb)
Documenting history of non-profit set up by the Support Group to
receive and disburse funds.
Jan 12 Response to Michael Collins - Ted Kuntz (PDF, 1mb)
Our new social media channels can be found here:
NCI Official Website - nationalcitizensinquiry.ca
NCI Newsletter Signup - nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/sig
NCI Livestream Events - nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/liv
NCI on X / Twitter - @NCICanada
NCI on Rumble - rumble.com/user/ncicanada
NCI Channels on Rumble - rumble.com/user/ncicanada/chan
NCI on Telegram - t.me/NCICanada
NCI on Facebook - facebook.com/NationalCitizensI
NCI on Instagram - instagram.com/ncicanada
NCI on TikTok - tiktok.com/nci.canada
NCI on YouTube - youtube.com/@ncicanada
NCI on Odysee - odysee.com/@NCICanada
Media requests can be directed here: info@nationalcitizensinquiry.c
Tune-in to SuperSpreaders with Jason Dahl Tonight
as we discuss
“Moving The NCI Forward”
Thursday Feb 1 — 5:30pm PST — 8:30pm EST
On NCI Live: nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/liv
On Rumble: https://rumble.com/.../
On YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/.../
On X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/.../
LISTEN - LEARN - RECOMMEND
nationalcitizensinquiry.ca/sig
Website icon
Facebook icon
Instagram icon
Twitter icon
TikTok icon
YouTube icon
National Citizens Inquiry
Copyright (C) 2024 National Citizens Inquiry. All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you signed-up via the National
Citizens Inquiry website.
Our mailing address is:
National Citizens Inquiry 350-4246 Albert Street Regina, SK S4S 3R9 Canada
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe
https://davidraymondamos3.blog
Thursday 1 February 2024
Freedom Convoy Class Action
On 11/26/23, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
> https://rumble.com/v33ontp-vac
>
> Vaccinated Lawyers w/ Daniel Ari Freiheit
> The Lavigne Show
> 2.07K followers
>
> Streamed on:
> Jul 31, 6:00 pm EDT
> 1.45K
>
>
> Welcome to the latest episode of YYC, Vaccinated Lawyers with Daniel
> Ari Freiheit, aka @LionAdvocacy.
>
> In this illuminating conversation, we're joined by Daniel Ari
> Freiheit, a prominent lawyer and outspoken advocate for healthy debate
> and awareness around vaccine rollouts and their societal implications.
> Daniel, the brother of famous podcaster Viva Frei, also made waves
> with his coverage of the Windsor Protests during the Freedom Convoy
> 2022.
>
> Throughout this discussion, we'll delve into Daniel's mission with
> Lion Advocacy. He provides insightful commentary on significant legal,
> ethical, and human rights issues, not just as a legal expert but as a
> concerned citizen, father of four, and multifaceted individual with a
> rich and varied background.
>
> One of our key topics in this episode is the impact of vaccine
> mandates on the legal profession in Canada, a critical issue that
> Daniel has insightfully addressed through his work.
>
> We'll also touch heavily on Daniel's anti-MAiD (Medical Assistance in
> Dying) work, a complex and often contentious issue he's passionate
> about addressing. As we navigate these challenging topics, Daniel’s
> dedication to fostering change through legal thinking, compassion, and
> humour shines through.
>
> So, buckle up and prepare for a deep dive into the mind of a
> vaccinated lawyer standing at the intersection of law, ethics, and
> social change.
>
> Lion Advocacy
> @LionAdvocacy
> Daniel Ari Freiheit, MBA, LLB.
> Personal Advocacy views. No legal advice.
> Remaining silent violated my conscience.
> Anti-MAID.
> LionAdvocacy@gmail.com
>
> Lion Law Professional Corporation is owned by
>
> Daniel Ari Freiheit, LL.B.,M.B.A.,
>
> Barrister, Solicitor, and Notary Public
>
> Practicing as a corporate/commercial specialist,
>
> in association with Pace Law Firm Professional Corporation
>
> and Rousseau Mazzuca LLP as counsel
>
> I'm a practical, business-minded corporate commercial lawyer helping
> clients achieve elegant and efficient legal solutions. I help startup
> and mature business grow and flourish; newcomers to Canada set up
> companies; and by working alongside employment, construction, personal
> injury, family, immigration and real estate lawyers, I draw from the
> expertise of a dynamic team of lawyers, and provide tactical guidance
> to a diversity of clients, including other professionals (lawyers,
> doctors, and accountants).
> Contact
>
> Address: 800-120 Eglinton Avenue East, Toronto, Ontario M4P 1E2
>
> Email: Daniel@LionLaw.ca
>
> C: 416.837.6725
>
> F: 416.352.7562
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
> Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2023 02:26:45 -0400
> Subject: Fwd: Attn LGen Wayne Eyre I just called and tried to explain
> this email and Federal Court File No T-1557-15 in particular
> To: cchristensen@valourlaw.com
>
> Catherine Christensen
> Called to the bar: 2015 (AB)
> Valour Law
> 405, 1 Tache St.
> St. Albert, Alberta T8N 1B4
> Phone: 780-544-2200
> Fax: 866-560-9826
> Email: cchristensen@valourlaw.com
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.blog
>
> Monday 26 April 2021
>
> YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON STALKER, all the NATO dudes and
> YOU know that I don't send Spam
>
>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: NIA_IG <nia_ig.fct@navy.mil>
>> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 11:03:08 +0000
>> Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] Fwd: Methinks the evil lawyer Howie
>> Cooper made a deal with the VERY NASTY FBI dudes in Beantown N'esy Pas
>> Howie Anglin?
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
>>
>> Dear David Amos,
>> The Naval Intelligence Activity (NIA) Office of the Inspector General
>> (IG) reviewed your email and attached .WAV file provided to the NIA
>> Hotline on 2 April 2021. I found no connection to the United States
>> Navy or United States Naval Intelligence.
>>
>> Naval Inspectors General exist to improve the efficiency and
>> effectiveness of US Navy Programs, and strive to eliminate and prevent
>> waste, fraud, and abuse with their respective departments. Naval IGs
>> are restricted to assessing matters falling within the purview of
>> their respective commanders.
>>
>> Citing the lack of an apparent connection to the US Navy or Naval
>> Intelligence, I am unable to provide further assistance, or provide
>> direct referral to any other agency or activity.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Mark Koneda
>> Investigator
>> Naval Intelligence Activity
>> Office of the Inspector General
>> NIA_IG@navy.mil
>> (301)669-3030 (unclass)
>> TSVOIP 560-3030
>>
>> INSPECTOR GENERAL SENSITIVE INFORMATION - FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY The
>> information contained in this email and any accompanying attachments
>> may contain Inspector General sensitive or pre-decisional information,
>> which is protected from mandatory disclosure under the Freedom of
>> Information Act (FOIA, 5 USC Section 552). It should not be released
>> to unauthorized persons. If you are not the intended recipient of this
>> information, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of
>> any action in reliance on this information is prohibited. If you
>> received this email in error, please notify this office by email or by
>> calling (301) 669-3030.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
>> Sent: Friday, April 2, 2021 12:50 PM
>> To: NIA_IG <nia_ig.fct@navy.mil>
>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Fwd: Methinks the evil lawyer Howie Cooper
>> made a deal with the VERY NASTY FBI dudes in Beantown N'esy Pas Howie
>> Anglin?
>
>
>
>
> Friday, 2 April 2021
> Russia warns NATO against deploying troops to Ukraine
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 15:41:27 -0400
> Subject: Attn LGen Wayne Eyre I just called and tried to explain this
> email and Federal Court File No T-1557-15 in particular
> To: wayne.eyre@forces.gc.ca, george.young@forces.gc.ca,
> Vincent.Rigby@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Shelly.Bruce@cse-cst.gc.ca,
> daniel.lauzon@international.gc
> alexander.steinhouse@justica.g
> anne.dawson@hrsdc-rhdcc.gc.ca, marjorie.michel@tbs-sct.gc.ca,
> jamie.innes@qpc-cpr.gc.ca, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier
> <premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>,
> premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier
> <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nt.ca>, premier
> <premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, Premier
> <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>, media@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Nathalie Sturgeon
> <sturgeon.nathalie@brunswickne
> "kris.austin" <kris.austin@gnb.ca>, "Richard.Ames"
> <Richard.Ames@gnb.ca>, "Richard.Bragdon" <Richard.Bragdon@parl.gc.ca>,
> "Ross.Wetmore" <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "rob.moore"
> <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "John.Williamson"
> <John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy" <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>,
> briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>, BrianThomasMacdonald
> <BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.co
> <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee" <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>
> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
> "Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
> <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Art.McDonald@forces.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:08:24 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: YO JONATHAN.VANCE You have been ducKing e
> since 2015 when I was running iN the election of the 42nd Parliament
> and suing the Queen in Federal Court Methinks it is YOU who should
> finally call me back N'esy Pas?
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.co
>
> The Acting Chief of the Defence Staff is LGen Wayne Eyre, he may be
> reached at wayne.eyre@forces.gc.ca.
>
> Le Chef d'état-major de la Défense par intérim est le LGen Wayne Eyre.
> Il peut être rejoint au wayne.eyre@forces.gc.ca.
>
> Art McD
> He/Him // Il/Lui
> Admiral/amiral Art McDonald
>
> Chief of the Defence Staff (CDS)
> Canadian Armed Forces
> art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca<mail
> 613-992-5054
>
> Chef d’état-major de la Defense (CÉMD)
> Forces armées canadiennes
> art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca<mail
> 613-992-5054
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 13:08:16 -0400
> Subject: YO JONATHAN.VANCE You have been ducKing e since 2015 when I
> was running iN the election of the 42nd Parliament and suing the Queen
> in Federal Court Methinks it is YOU
> who should finally call me back N'esy Pas?
> To: art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca, richard.jolette@forces.gc.ca,
> JONATHAN.VANCE@forces.gc.ca, Tammy.Harris@forces.gc.ca,
> Jill.Chisholm@justice.gc.ca, Cedric.Aspirault@forces.gc.ca,
> Derek.Sloan@parl.gc.ca, Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca,
> Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> clare.barry@justice.gc.ca, elder.marques@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
> michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
> dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "blaine.higgs" <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
> fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@
> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.c
> <andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>
> Marwan.Tabbara@parl.gc.ca, Yasmin.Ratansi@parl.gc.ca,
> Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>
> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
> Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news-tips
> <news-tips@nytimes.com>, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
> ombudsman-communications@force
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: JONATHAN.VANCE@forces.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:01:09 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON
> STALKER, all the NATO dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.co
>
> Admiral Art McDonald is now the Chief of the Defence Staff, he may be
> reached at art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca. I will continue to monitor this
> account periodically until my retirement from the Canadian Armed
> Forces. Please reach out to EA CDS, LCol Richard Jolette at
> richard.jolette@forces.gc.ca if you require to get a hold of me.
>
> L'amiral Art McDonald est maintenant le Chef d'état-major de la
> Défense, on peut le joindre au art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca. Je
> continuerai de surveiller ce compte périodiquement jusqu'à ma retraite
> des Forces armées canadiennes. Veuillez contacter CdeC CEMD, Lcol
> Richard Jolette au richard.jolette@forces.gc.ca si vous avez besoin de
> me contacter.
>
> On 3/11/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:35:27 -0400
>> Subject: Re: YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON STALKER, all the
>> NATO dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam
>> To: Michel.Drapeau@mdlo.ca, "Gilles.Moreau" <Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>
>> Cc: mlo-blm@forces.gc.ca, "erin.otoole" <erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca>,
>> "Katie.Telford" <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "jagmeet.singh"
>> <jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
>> "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
>>
>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada
>>
>>
>> Prosecuting high-ranking officers a 'significant challenge'
>>
>> "Retired colonel and lawyer Michel Drapeau, who is a leading expert in
>> military justice, said he wonders how a court martial could hear a
>> case involving Vance or McDonald when no one in the military,
>> including judges, would outrank them."
>>
>> PERHAPS I SHOULD SUE THEM EH???
>>
>> On 9/23/19, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
>>> Byrne Furlong
>>> Press Secretary
>>> Office of the Minister of National Defence
>>> 613-996-3100
>>>
>>> Media Relations
>>> Department of National Defence
>>> 613-996-2353
>>> mlo-blm@forces.gc.ca
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
>>> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:14:23 -0300
>>> Subject: Fwd: YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON STALKER, all the
>>> NATO dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam
>>> To: Michel.Drapeau@mdlo.ca, Walter.Semianiw@mdlo.ca, Newsroom
>>> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>
>>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Peter Stoffer
>>> STRATEGIC ADVISOR
>>>
>>> (613) 236-2657 x200
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Mr. Stoffer served as a Member of Parliament for the riding of
>>> Sackville-Eastern Shore from 1997 to 2015. During 2011-2015, he served
>>> as the Official Opposition Critic for Veterans Affairs.
>>>
>>> During this time, Mr. Stoffer was honoured with a variety of awards
>>> from the environmental, military, provincial and federal communities.
>>> He was named Canada’s Parliamentarian of the year 2013, and he
>>> received the Veterans Ombudsman award. Mr Stoffer has been knighted
>>> into the Order of St. George and has also been knighted by the King of
>>> the Netherlands into the Order of Orange Nassau.
>>>
>>> He is currently volunteering for a variety of veteran organizations.
>>> He is also host to a radio show called “Hour of Heroes in Nova Scotia”
>>> on Community Radio, Radio Station 97-5 CIOE-FM, the Voice of the East
>>> Coast Music.
>>>
>>>
>>> Colonel-Maître® Michel William Drapeau
>>> SENIOR COUNSEL
>>> (613) 236-2657 x200
>>> Michel.Drapeau@mdlo.ca
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 13:43:40 -0300
>>> Subject: YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON STALKER, all the NATO
>>> dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam
>>> To: JONATHAN.VANCE@forces.gc.ca, "Gilles.Moreau"
>>> <Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, stalker.mason@hq.nato.int
>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
>>> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, ombudsman-communications@force
>>> "Paul.Shuttle" <Paul.Shuttle@pco-bcp.gc.ca>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: MASON.STALKER@forces.gc.ca
>>> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:38:01 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: [SUSPECTED SPAM / SPAM SUSPECT] A little
>>> Deja Vu for JONATHAN.VANCE et al
>>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Good day,
>>>
>>> Please note that I do not have regular access to DWAN and your email
>>> has not been forwarded.
>>>
>>> Please forward your email to: stalker.mason@hq.nato.int
>>>
>>> Thank you in advance,
>>>
>>> MJS
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/23/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: MASON.STALKER@forces.gc.ca
>>>> Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 12:04:41 +0000
>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks its obvious why the Crown would
>>>> drop the charges after Mark Norman's lawyers hit Trudeau and his buddy
>>>> Butts with subpoenas N'esy Pas/
>>>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Good day,
>>>>
>>>> Please note that I do not have regular access to DWAN and your email
>>>> has not been forwarded.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: JONATHAN.VANCE@forces.gc.ca
>>>> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:26:35 +0000
>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: I see that the the evil blogger in Alberta
>>>> Barry Winters aka Mr Baconfat is still practising libel and hate
>>>> speech contrary to Sections 300 and 319 0f the Canadian Criminal
>>>> Code
>>>> N'esy Pas Mr Prime Minister Trudeau "The Younger" ???
>>>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> I will be out of the office until 23 February 2016. I am unable to
>>>> monitor my e-mail during this time. For urgent matters, please contact
>>>> my Chief of Staff, BGen Tammy Harris (Tammy.Harris@forces.gc.ca), or
>>>> my EA, Maj Cedric Aspirault (Cedric.Aspirault@forces.gc.ca
>>>> whom can contact me.
>>>>
>>>> Je serai hors du bureau jusqu'au 23 février 2016. Il ne me sera pas
>>>> possible de vérifier mes couriels pendant cette période. En cas
>>>> d'urgence, veuillez contacter ma chef d'état major, Bgén Tammy Harris
>>>> (Tammy.Harris@forces.gc.ca), ou mon CdC, le maj Cédric Aspirault
>>>> (Cedric.Aspirault@forces.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: "Chisholm, Jill" <Jill.Chisholm@justice.gc.ca>
>>>> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:26:34 +0000
>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: I see that the the evil blogger in Alberta
>>>> Barry Winters aka Mr Baconfat is still practising libel and hate
>>>> speech contrary to Sections 300 and 319 0f the Canadian Criminal Code
>>>> N'esy Pas Mr Prime Minister Trudeau "The Younger" ???
>>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your message. I will be away from the office until
>>>> Friday, February 26, 2016 and will not be accessing email frequently
>>>> during this time. Should you require assistance please contact
>>>> Jacqueline Fenton at (902) 426-6996. Otherwise I will be pleased to
>>>> respond to your message upon my return.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada
>>>> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
>>>> Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 16:46:28 +0000
>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: YOr Ralph Goodale Methinks this should
>>>> stress the Integrity of the Globe and Mail and your minions in the
>>>> RCMP N'esy Pas?
>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
>>>> Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
>>>> Please be assured that your email has been received and will be read
>>>> with
>>>> care.
>>>> However, in light of the federal elections being held on October 21,
>>>> there may be a delay in processing your email.
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________
>>>>
>>>> Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
>>>> Justice et procureur général du Canada.
>>>> Soyez assuré que votre courriel a bien été reçu et que celui-ci sera
>>>> lu avec soin.
>>>> Cependant, compte tenu des élections fédérales du 21 octobre prochain,
>>>> veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le
>>>> traitement de votre courriel.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
No comments:
Post a Comment