From: LECA Accommodation (MAG) <LECA.Accommodation@ontario.ca>
Date: Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 12:26 AM
Subject: Automatic reply: Fw: A One-Time Email from Jason Lavigne, PPC Candidate for Parkland
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Your email has been received by the Law Enforcement Complaints Agency. This is an automatic reply confirming receipt of your email.
Please read the information below:
• This auto-reply will only be sent to your email address once per day, even if you send several emails in one day.
• E-mails and online messages that require a response will be acknowledged in two business days and answered in 15 business days.
• Our system cannot receive attachments larger than 10 megabytes.
For more information on the LECA’s complaint process, please visit our website at www.leca.ca. You can also reach us by telephone Monday to Friday, except holidays, from 8:30 am to 4:30 pm at 416-246-7071, or toll-free at 1-877-411-4773.
Thank you,
NOTICE: Confidential message which may be privileged. If received in error, please delete the message and advise us by return email. Thank you.
______________________________
RÉPONSE AUTOMATIQUE
Votre courriel a été reçu par l'Agence des plaintes contre les forces de l'ordre (APFO). Il s'agit d'une réponse automatique confirmant la réception de votre email.
Veuillez lire les informations ci-dessous :
• Cette réponse automatique ne sera envoyée à votre adresse e-mail qu'une fois par jour, même si vous envoyez plusieurs e-mails en une journée.
• Les e-mails et messages en ligne nécessitant une réponse recevront un accusé de réception dans un délai de deux jours ouvrables et une réponse dans un délai de 15 jours ouvrables.
• Notre système ne peut pas recevoir de pièces jointes de plus de 10 mégaoctets.
Pour plus d’informations sur le processus de plainte de l’APFO, veuillez visiter notre site Web à www.leca.ca/fr . Vous pouvez également nous joindre par téléphone du lundi au vendredi, sauf jours fériés, de 8h30 à 16h30 au 416-246-7071, ou sans frais au 1-877-411-4773.
Merci
AVIS: Message confidentiel pouvant être privilégié. En cas de réception par erreur, veuillez supprimer le message et nous en informer par retour d'e-mail. Merci.
Date: Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 12:23 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: A One-Time Email from Jason Lavigne, PPC Candidate for Parkland
To: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, <ps.ministerofpublicsafety-ministredelasecuritepublique.sp@ps-sp.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, prontoman1 <prontoman1@protonmail.com>, Marco.Mendicino <Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, fin.minfinance-financemin.fin <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, dominic.leblanc <dominic.leblanc@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>, <jasonlavigne@outlook.com>, <perreaultj@ottawapolice.ca>, <LECA.Accommodation@ontario.ca>
Date: Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 11:30 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: Fw: A One-Time Email from Jason Lavigne, PPC Candidate for Parkland
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
(French follows)
IMPORTANT - PLEASE READ
Please note that we are currently receiving a high volume of correspondence. This may mean a delay in our response to you.
Nous accusons réception de votre courriel adressé à L’honorable Dominic LeBlanc, cp, cr, député de Beauséjour, et nous vous en remercions.
Député de Beauséjour
Date: Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 11:27 PM
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for writing to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be carefully reviewed.
We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.
-------------------
Merci d'avoir écrit au ministre de la Justice et procureur général du Canada.
En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
avec soin.
Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.
From: Minister of Finance / Ministre des Finances <minister-ministre@fin.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 11:27 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: Fw: A One-Time Email from Jason Lavigne, PPC Candidate for Parkland
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 11:23 PM
Subject: Fwd: Fw: A One-Time Email from Jason Lavigne, PPC Candidate for Parkland
To: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, <ps.ministerofpublicsafety-ministredelasecuritepublique.sp@ps-sp.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, prontoman1 <prontoman1@protonmail.com>, Marco.Mendicino <Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, fin.minfinance-financemin.fin <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, dominic.leblanc <dominic.leblanc@parl.gc.ca>
From: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 2:54 PM
Subject: Fw: A One-Time Email from Jason Lavigne, PPC Candidate for Parkland
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Sent: March 28, 2025 2:12 AM
To: Jason Lavigne <jasonlavigne@outlook.com>
Subject: Re: A One-Time Email from Jason Lavigne, PPC Candidate for Parkland
Sent: March 26, 2025 2:56 PM
To: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: A One-Time Email from Jason Lavigne, PPC Candidate for Parkland
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2025 11:04:56 AM
To: Jason Lavigne <jasonlavigne@outlook.com>
Subject: Re: A One-Time Email from Jason Lavigne, PPC Candidate for Parkland
Sent: March 25, 2025 12:40 PM
To: dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>
Subject: A One-Time Email from Jason Lavigne, PPC Candidate for Parkland
Hello friend,
I hope you’re doing well. I am Jason Lavigne, host of The Lavigne Show and PPC Candidate for Parkland, Alberta. You’re receiving this one-time email because you either signed up on one of my websites, the PPC party provided your email address, or we’ve connected in the past.
No action is required if you do not wish to receive further emails. This is the only email you will receive unless you choose to stay informed at https://Parkland.vote.
We have an essential federal election on Monday, April 28, 2025, and I would be grateful for your support. Due to riding changes in 2023, you may now be in the new Parkland riding if you previously lived in the Yellowhead or Sturgeon River–Parkland ridings.
Areas in Parkland include Spruce Grove, Drayton Valley, Mayerthorpe, Stony Plain, Breton, Spring Lake, Betula Beach, Kapasiwin, Lakeview, Point Alison, Seba Beach, the Indian reserves of Enoch Cree Nation No. 135, Wabamun No. 133A & 133B, Brazeau County, Parkland County, and parts of Lac Ste. Anne County and Yellowhead County. A map is attached below for your reference.
If you live in one of these areas, I would greatly appreciate your help signing the attached “Electors Consenting to Candidacy” form to meet the requirements to appear on the ballot. Signing the form is not a commitment to vote for me; it simply enables me to run. If you’re willing:
-
Download & Print the PDF form located at
https://parkland.vote/
signature - Sign it with a witness
- Scan it to PDF
- Email it back to me or to oa@parkland.vote
If you live outside Parkland or would like to support my campaign further, please visit https://Parkland.vote to learn more, sign up for updates, or consider donating. You may be eligible for a tax credit of up to 75% of your donation. Details are available at https://Parkland.vote/donate. Your donation directly supports my campaign, and every dollar will be used wisely.
Thank you for your time, and I look forward to working hard to bring Parkland’s voice to the House of Commons.
Sincerely,
Jason Lavigne
Host of The Lavigne Show
PPC Candidate for Parkland, Alberta
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=ea957fde87&attid=0.0.1&permmsgid=msg-f:1827861399026707672&th=195dde420ba2acd8&view=fimg&fur=ip&permmsgid=msg-f:1827861399026707672&sz=s0-l75-ft&attbid=ANGjdJ8xY3vpXzpi3nfR6qCfohCksdlIujIlr7FIq3ZwfJ6tNVo8kl-6yuq9GN7uqXWU5-rKwsPHsplY74Q_E-JYuULV9YiOlxsNIt2Vf7ZWX5D7XOb5lQV3SEeFxVU&disp=emb&zw
From: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 2:17 AM
Subject: Fw: Confidential Police Complaint 25-0127
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Sent: March 3, 2025 2:07 PM
To: LECA Accommodation (MAG) <LECA.Accommodation@ontario.ca
Subject: Re: Confidential Police Complaint 25-0127
Sent: March 3, 2025 9:50 AM
To: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: Confidential Police Complaint 25-0127
Good morning,
I am writing with respect to your email(s).
Can you please clarify if your email(s) and/or information relates to any open complaint with our office? If so, please provide the complaint number you wish this email to filed with by March 10, 2025.
If a response is not received by this date, LECA will be unable to consider your email(s) and/or information in relation to any open complaint(s). Further, LECA will not be maintaining a copy of this email and/or information in our records.
If you would like to file a new complaint with our office, you may file one at
https://complaint.leca.ca/
Sincerely,
Case Management Unit
Law Enforcement Complaints Agency (LECA)
655 Bay Street | 10th Floor | Toronto, ON | M7A 2T4
Phone: 416-246-7071
From: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>
Sent: Monday, March 3, 2025 5:59 AM
To: Perreault, Jenny C <PerreaultJ@ottawapolice.ca>; LECA Accommodation (MAG) <LECA.Accommodation@ontario.ca
Subject: Re: Confidential Police Complaint 25-0127
Importance: High
CAUTION -- EXTERNAL E-MAIL - Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.
Good morning Sgt.J.Perreault
I would like to make some things very clear.
As far as I am concerned, this is a criminal investigation.
Remember " Equality before and under the law".
I was subject to a great miscarriage of Justice and held accountable instantly with zero investigation nor justification. Or so the disclosure to courts may make you think.
As a citizen knowing full well, had not committed any crimes there are tools we have to protect ourselves.
Being a little nieve at the time, immediately contacted the Ottawa Police and wanted to report two Officers for crimes on 02/19/2022 over the phone. I was told it needs to go to Police Conduct board of Ottawa Police. "You can't just charge an Officer(s) with a crime" was told to me on the phone. A year later was contacted by an inspector and told nothing can be done while case is before the courts.
Since that time the LECA was put into practice. And then my case withdrawn when no Judge in their right mind would put me on trial because of the notice they were given just two days prior. (Evidence to come) No Judge ever showed up!
Imagine if after two years waiting for justice in court, I had not shown up? They did not want my evidence and even my lawyer was compromised by the criminal organization JCCF. (Justice Center for Constitutional Freedoms)
We are now almost four years away and what I have witnessed and been a party to from police, courts and lawyers is down right sinister.
Every Officer that touched me "Should have known or ought to know that the orders and actions taken were unconstitutional"
Already proven in court, btw. 1. Legal protest 2. Illegal and unconstitutional use of Emergencies Act.
Withholding pertinent information from the courts in my case and another will show it is being done on a massive scale of "unfair trials".
The administration should also be held liable under 98(1)(2) Duties of special constable employer.
They all took part in, Political activity
86 No police officer who is a member of a police service maintained by a police service board shall engage in political activity, except as permitted by the regulations.
Proof will be provided to show the criminal code 366 "Document manipulation" was used and approved from superiors. Changing wording from original document given to the accused, to what was used in courts. Picture #1 attached. Withholding evidence or omission of such also falls under this code. By withholding the videos from the pinpointed public camera from courts and access to information.
Picture #3 Do you have the recording from this device set up right where I was standing and the communication between the unamed officers? Where the first thing I asked was to walk away peacefully? Amongst other pertinent information omitted from disclosure?
If you look where I was standing, was in a crosswalk. I did not put any obstruction up or take part. I did however stand on top of a placed obstruction that was guided in by Police in a legal protest. I was never served any notification that I was in some deemed illegal zone.
99 (1) Subject to subsection (2), the Minister may suspend or terminate a special constable employer’s authorization if,
(a) the employer provided false or misleading information under this Act or the regulations;
(b) the employer failed to act in accordance with the terms and conditions of the authorization;
(c) in the Minister’s opinion, the employer did not take appropriate action when the employer knew or ought reasonably to have known that his, her or its special constable employee contravened the terms and conditions of his or her certificate of appointment or contravened any other provision of this Act.
Since being notified in 2022 of misconduct and contraventions of the Police Services Act, how come not one suspension or charge has been laid as swiftly as charges were placed on me for far much less suspicion of breaking laws? (Equality before and under the law)
In Canada, collusion can refer to criminal activity such as bid-rigging, price-fixing, and foreign interference in political processes.
A trial judge faced with evidence of potential collusion must directly address the evidence and consider its impact on the witness’s credibility and reliability. (Special Constables & Officers included.)
I will spare you some of the full explanations of the laws we are dealing with today, but I will not cut down my email size as to miss the full extent of the allegations.
In the next week or so you will receive a device, Model # SM-f926w Serial # RFCRA1PQ6LZ IMEI 355662720584257
With instructions on how to deal with the meta data, emails, apps, analytics and passwords.
The metadata you are interested in, is what was created from officers, lawyers and courts.
I will omit nothing!
When the Crown Attorney received the 32gb SD card from me and OPS took it, there was a case before the courts. As I walked up to the Crown Attorney I asked "How would you like to have them arrested and put in jail?" The Crown Attorneysaid "Yes!" (With witnesses) The Crown then introduced me to an OPS Officer that sat me down in private and asked "What is on the card?" I not only described, I showed him. After the conversation he took the SD card and made a report, or so he told me and said "I will get this to the right people". He agreed "This needs to be known".
The next day I received a call from an Ottawa Police Officer asking to have a meeting. Then he texted me and used Signal app to ask if it was OK to have an OPP Officer present with a Professional standards person. I agreed and only two officers showed up. We had that over hour long meeting they did not want at the station. Instead, at a Tim Hortons parking lot in Kanata. I knew there was something strange about those guys when they refused to take evidence. They took a lot of notes though as I showed them crimes. The OPP Officer even apologized for not answering a call for service when I received a dead animal in my parents mailbox wrapped in newspaper with a peace sign written in permanent marker.
A death threat was "Not important enough to make the drive out to your place" is what I was told on the phone. I guess one has to be rich to get a call for service answered. BTW the OPS Officer used his phone to text me after I left to say "you forgot your sunglasses", do you think I forgot them?
I tell you that one short experience for a very solid reason. Saying something is just accusations and suspicion you do not necessarily need to investigate. But when you have evidence in hand, it becomes duty to investigate.
Officer Blondie from PLT contacted me when one of your "person of intrest" (picture #2) was threatening me and actively engaged in cyber crime, he had a duty to investigate. He contacted me, even came to shake my hand because of my peaceful and knowledgeable nature. I provided proof of exactly what he was asking for. First thing he said to me was "a relationship is built on trust". When I seen that he could not be trusted and taking no action, that was the end of our friendly relationship. Then he became retaliatory and when I went to the station to give evidence and testimony he instructed the officers there to threaten to arrest me and not take a report. Instead they kicked me out of a police station.
When considering all the factors that you will find out in your investigation, it will become very clear on the collusion.
Why the political pundits wanted to use tanks on peaceful protesters. Why before one person made it to Ottawa our Prime Minister was using "Hate speech" and creating propaganda about lawful citizens. Why the Prime Minister was not held to accountability of the law from security services even though the criminal acts were quite apparent. "Equality before and under the law".
Then there is the whole Five Eyes file on the various political parties and platforms that inserted themselves with Canada Unity and James Bauder. I bet it is quite similar to my understanding and files. Coincidentally became the people that law enforcement colluded with to achieve many things! TBOF, WEXIT, WILD ROSE, MAVERICK Party, just to name a couple, of two are proven funded by huge foreign entities engaged in political interference worldwide.
When James Bauder learned of my skillset, he contacted me to help because of what Jason Laface (or 60+ other names this guy has) was doing in the background with his servers. (Created 50 subdomains) I spent hours on the phone simultaneously with WIX & Godaddy security watching and capturing the cyber crimes in action and reported this to Officer Blondie. The kicker, LaFace was in Ottawa jurisdiction when committing the crimes not far from Blondie and even in his view within hours. Blondie that contacted me for this very person's actions failed to take action. His boss Wong or Wang said on a live video with me as he entered a room to Blondie "Why are you wasting fucking time and still on that call? End the Fucking conversation!".
Blondie knew I seen and heard him, and apologized " it is just inter office talk" is how he tried to explain it away. That interaction showed me something else though.
It got me to thinking on who these officers were in contact with on the ground in Jan-Feb of 2022. It turns out, quite a lot!
It also turns out to be a few key individuals operating with the "Persons of intrest" designation since 2022 to present, ment to create political propaganda, conflict, shock video for news purposes. For example, the TUPOC clown show downtown was much more than just idiots taking over that church. It was actually a well orchestrated and funded operation that active duty police helped to facilitate.
The JCCF lawyers facilitated an illegal communications social media room for top influencers, main stream media writers and alternative media against clients and others conditions. This so happens to be people like Tamara Lich, Chris Barber, Tom Marrazo, Daniel Bulford, and 50+ others all in the same room 24/7 for months after their arrests planning and plotting new adventures! I was invited before I knew who was in the room. Immediately after entering was told "This is fight club!" And was no joke! I did stay in the room for months and recorded everything. They even have pdf's on how to carry out and create propaganda I will provide. This is where the Crown Attorney and Police knew and did not inform the Judge . Now their cases awaiting verdict. From this information alone, their cases can be thrown out. Was that always the plan? I do not believe these people are guilty of the crimes charged with, oh but much more serious crimes in the totality. Like the Corporations Fraud of Freedom Corporation I can also prove. I requested their files at Corporations Canada and received them. Only with someone's help within Corporations Canada could they apply and be approved for non-soliciting status but also travel the world collecting donations as Directors without claiming any in their documentation and zero investigations. Totally against Canada Corporations ACT.
"The trial of the century" eh? Makes for great news and propaganda.
You could also ask the Crown Attorneys Office of communications from this email account Dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com and see where I warn them about leaving out pertinent information from active cases and closed cases.
There is no way any of this happened without political police interference outside of their duties.
I wish to make a swarn in video recorded deposition on all of it with supporting documents.
Want to see where the court, your Police Chiefs and over 300 others including the Prime Minister were warned before I was put on trial? With responses.
The best info is at the bottom of the page.
Now why would lawyers be working with Police to pressure clients to "accept deals"?
I see zero proper investigations into the creation and execution of the massive foreign politically motivated and controlled operations happening in Canada. Even the Emergencies Act Inquiry was done illegally. Picture #4 Why would anyone Judge put on record that he is not responsible for the decision?
Now, you have some sources to gather information from and a crux of the situation.
Regards,
Dana-lee Melfi
From: Perreault, Jenny C <PerreaultJ@ottawapolice.ca>
Sent: February 27, 2025 7:25 AM
To: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Confidential Police Complaint 25-0127
Good Morning Mr.Melfi,
For clarity, I’m in no way asking you to identify the officer(s) by name. My request is for you to provide the information necessary to properly identify the officers we, as the Ottawa Police, need to name as the “respondent officers” to your complaint. You mentioned several officers were involved but seem to center your complaint on the arresting officers.
Therefore, my question to you is:
- Are the arresting officers the crux of your complaint?
If so, yes, we will identify them, name them as the respondent officers in your complaint and seek the information necessary to best assist you in having your complaint investigated fully.
As indicated in my initial correspondence with you yesterday, I am the complaint intake Sergeant. I will not be the investigator.
All of the information in the 3 emails you sent me yesterday afternoon, will be attached to your complaint file.
Thank you,
Jenny
Sgt.J.Perreault
Professional Standards Branch
613-236-1222 ext 3436
From: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2025 5:10 PM
To: Perreault, Jenny C <PerreaultJ@ottawapolice.ca>;
LECA Accommodation (MAG) <LECA.Accommodation@ontario.ca
Subject: [EXTERNAL]Re: Confidential Police Complaint 25-0127
|
|
You don't often get email from dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com. Learn why this is important |
|
|
Caution:This Email is from an EXTERNAL source. Ensure you trust this sender before clicking on any links or attachments. |
Re: Confidential Police Complaint 25-0127
Dana-lee Melfi
Perreault, Jenny C;
LECA Accommodation (MAG)
Hello Sgt.J.Perreault,
With all due respect Sergeant, I have sent in additional information to the LECA with pictures and identifying markers of the individuals that pointed a rifle at my head and illegally detained and arrested me. LECA said all additional information, explanations would be shared with the investigators. Did they share the communications?
You have had this file for nine days and access to all police files on DANA-LEE MELFI. The point is, you should already know by law who the arresting officers are. I have asked for a copy of the disclosure provided to the courts and denied. I have seen it though in my lawyers office only. The officers in question were not identified in the disclosure.
I tried to do ATIP & Municipal Access to information requests on the footage to gain more information on my illegal arrest. RCMP have lied on their response to my request and City of Ottawa has outright denied the request.
The good thing here is my arrest was captured many ways. Police drone, news helicopter, journalists and many citizens.
Attached are the pictures of contact with Police Identifiers. I also provided the OPS with a 32gb SD card with much information. I had a joint meeting with OPS & OPP on March 3rd 2024 in Kanata and they took notes.
Please keep in mind the complaint is not solely about the unidentified officers and on the process itself. A great place to start questioning would be to question Officer Blondie of the PLT. Warning though, him and Wong are as crooked as apple tree branches.
I have a multitude of explanation written on my website on why I was targeted, and the process I have taken to gather information.
The one you would be interested in atm is
https://peace-man.ca/about/f/
The whole arrest was captured on a City owned camera for "Public Safety and tourism" that is being protected by Police to not get out and showing THEIR CRIMES. I have unsuccessfully put in Access to Information requests to the OPS directly and ask that you the investigative team take into consideration the importance of these requests.
Now, as per the policing act and the subsequent acts for regular officers and special constables, the officers involved were not working within the understanding of the Charter or Bill of Rights. Due to this their immunity is moot.
When going to Ottawa in January of 2022 I was not like any of the others.
I knew the proven criminal organizations like OPS, RCMP would not act accordingly. So, I went to "build a case". I specifically stood within camera view for 25 days in peace making sure never to break a law. I also seen the other side with the infiltration of the citizen led movement and is another facet of my investigations. I was able to infiltrate them in secret "Clandestine" communications rooms and much more.
To understand this method and process this is a great document read and understand. It is incomplete because I put it out to the public as a feeler to see who is paying attention. The LECA have the document, and it can be found here as the first pdf.
https://peace-man.ca/
Side note: All the officers in picture #4 where I was stood for over an hour in cuffs behind my back (I am a registered disabled person with two dislocated shoulders that informed and requested front cuffs) in -30 when I pissed from cold & fear, frozen to my leg, my medications refused, paraded for media as a criminal, are complicit in document manipulation and crimes like cruel and unusual punishment. While standing there, even the officer switched off because they were cold. I begged politely and peacefully. Then I was put in the back of a police car and the officers (with a camera active in the car) questioned me and seen how many times I have been a victim dating to my childhood. They seen I was a government employee and never convicted of breaking any laws. Told me that they were going to recommend after transport I be let free (I watched them write that note on my paper). After transport to the water works I was stripped down and refused a bathroom. Three bags of "evidence" was collected and zero inventory taken. I received two back and less $1500 in cash.
I noticed a temporary camera set up and recording during intake. Where is that footage?
I was then informed of three charges for the first time. I was informed after asking a question that I had disobeyed the "Emergencies Act" as one of the charges. My discharge saying Disobey lawful court order" and changed to "dissobey lawful order" in court. I will provide proof of both and the use of criminal code 366 "Document manipulation" Every officer there was hostile while I was cooperative and peaceful.
I have such detail that I could give layouts of the pumping station down to where the folding tables, cameras, lockup behind officers filled with evidence bags, and more are.
one lady described herself as a lawyer for the police.
She was the one that said that if I didn't sign the conditions I would be going to jail. Ottawa is my birthplace and these conditions were against the Charter.
In duress I placed an X. My Rights and Freedoms such as, freedom of conscience, expression and opinion, thought and belief, of peaceful assembly, Association, and mobility Rights all TAKEN from me. The most important that you should recognize is " equality, before and under the law" was stripped!
Yes, I have found out way more than I bargained for.
As per the ATIP ACT I could request that an investigator of a government agency can take these requests and bring to the attention of the OIC (Office of the Information Commissioner) as to determine if the requests should be done as part of the investigation. That is a next step.
So far, what you have shown is a redundant question to me on the identity of the two officers when YOUR office is the one with this answer.
Any communication and replies with OPS and I, will be sent to the LECA as per their request in email dated 10/27/2024.
I have an abundance of information regarding this LECA complaint with more than OPS involved.
My response bounced back as was over 19mb. I will send what I had to omit in a second email to Sgt.J.perreault to identify two of the officers. I cannot send the video footage.
Regards,
Dana-lee Melfi
From: Perreault, Jenny C <PerreaultJ@ottawapolice.ca>
Sent: February 26, 2025 12:07 PM
To: Dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com <D
Subject: Confidential Police Complaint 25-0127
Good Afternoon Mr.Melfi,
I am the complaint intake Sergeant with the Ottawa Police Professional Standards Unit. I have reviewed your police complaint dated 2024-10-21, as received via the Law Enforcement Complaint’s Agency and have reviewed it. My purpose in contacting you is as follows:
· In order to address your complaint, the officer(s) need to be identified.
· Are you able to please advise me as to who this complaint is directed at? (The arresting officers or otherwise). Please note, we cannot blanket approach a police complaint. It does need to be narrowed down as best as you can with regards to the involved officer(s).
Once we have the officer(s) properly identified, we can determine how best to navigate this matter with you.
I look forward to your response and thank you in advance.
Respectfully,
Jenny
Sgt.J.Perreault
Professional Standards Branch
613-236-1222 ext 3436
The contents of this e-mail, including any attachments, are intended for the exclusive use of the named recipient. This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are strictly prohibited from using, disclosing, copying, or distributing this e-mail or any of its contents. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail immediately and permanently delete this e-mail and its attachments, along with any copies thereof. Thank you for your collaboration.
The contents of this e-mail, including any attachments, are intended for the exclusive use of the named recipient. This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are strictly prohibited from using, disclosing, copying, or distributing this e-mail or any of its contents. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail immediately and permanently delete this e-mail and its attachments, along with any copies thereof. Thank you for your collaboration.
From: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 2:15 AM
Subject: Fw: Confidential Police Complaint 25-0127
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Sent: March 17, 2025 2:05 PM
To: Perreault, Jenny C <PerreaultJ@ottawapolice.ca>; eric.stubbs@ottawapolice.ca <eric.stubbs@ottawapolice.ca>; Tkachyk, Ann (MAG) <Ann.Tkachyk@ontario.ca>
Subject: Re: Confidential Police Complaint 25-0127
Sent: March 3, 2025 8:33 AM
To: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Confidential Police Complaint 25-0127
Good Morning Mr.Melfi,
Thank you for the additional information. I have added it to your complaint file along with the other emails and attachments you had provided to me. As indicated previously, I am the intake Sergeant. The file will move out of my hands for investigation. Once the investigating Sergeant has a chance to review the totality of your information, they will be the ones to reach out should any clarifications be needed.
Any other information you would like to include should be provided directly to the investigator moving forward.
The device you mention you will be providing, is best kept in your possession until such time it can managed solely by the investigator. I would refrain from sending it via mail for example- to avoid any necessary information from being lost.
Thank you,
Jenny
Sgt.J.Perreault
Professional Standards Branch
613-236-1222 ext 3436
From: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>
Sent: Monday, March 3, 2025 5:59 AM
To: Perreault, Jenny C <PerreaultJ@ottawapolice.ca>; LECA Accommodation (MAG) <LECA.Accommodation@ontario.ca
Subject: [EXTERNAL]Re: Confidential Police Complaint 25-0127
Importance: High
|
Caution:This Email is from an EXTERNAL source. Ensure you trust this sender before clicking on any links or attachments. |
Good morning Sgt.J.Perreault
I would like to make some things very clear.
As far as I am concerned, this is a criminal investigation.
Remember " Equality before and under the law".
I was subject to a great miscarriage of Justice and held accountable instantly with zero investigation nor justification. Or so the disclosure to courts may make you think.
As a citizen knowing full well, had not committed any crimes there are tools we have to protect ourselves.
Being a little nieve at the time, immediately contacted the Ottawa Police and wanted to report two Officers for crimes on 02/19/2022 over the phone. I was told it needs to go to Police Conduct board of Ottawa Police. "You can't just charge an Officer(s) with a crime" was told to me on the phone. A year later was contacted by an inspector and told nothing can be done while case is before the courts.
Since that time the LECA was put into practice. And then my case withdrawn when no Judge in their right mind would put me on trial because of the notice they were given just two days prior. (Evidence to come) No Judge ever showed up!
Imagine if after two years waiting for justice in court, I had not shown up? They did not want my evidence and even my lawyer was compromised by the criminal organization JCCF. (Justice Center for Constitutional Freedoms)
We are now almost four years away and what I have witnessed and been a party to from police, courts and lawyers is down right sinister.
Every Officer that touched me "Should have known or ought to know that the orders and actions taken were unconstitutional"
Already proven in court, btw. 1. Legal protest 2. Illegal and unconstitutional use of Emergencies Act.
Withholding pertinent information from the courts in my case and another will show it is being done on a massive scale of "unfair trials".
The administration should also be held liable under 98(1)(2) Duties of special constable employer.
They all took part in, Political activity
86 No police officer who is a member of a police service maintained by a police service board shall engage in political activity, except as permitted by the regulations.
Proof will be provided to show the criminal code 366 "Document manipulation" was used and approved from superiors. Changing wording from original document given to the accused, to what was used in courts. Picture #1 attached. Withholding evidence or omission of such also falls under this code. By withholding the videos from the pinpointed public camera from courts and access to information.
Picture #3 Do you have the recording from this device set up right where I was standing and the communication between the unamed officers? Where the first thing I asked was to walk away peacefully? Amongst other pertinent information omitted from disclosure?
If you look where I was standing, was in a crosswalk. I did not put any obstruction up or take part. I did however stand on top of a placed obstruction that was guided in by Police in a legal protest. I was never served any notification that I was in some deemed illegal zone.
99 (1) Subject to subsection (2), the Minister may suspend or terminate a special constable employer’s authorization if,
(a) the employer provided false or misleading information under this Act or the regulations;
(b) the employer failed to act in accordance with the terms and conditions of the authorization;
(c) in the Minister’s opinion, the employer did not take appropriate action when the employer knew or ought reasonably to have known that his, her or its special constable employee contravened the terms and conditions of his or her certificate of appointment or contravened any other provision of this Act.
Since being notified in 2022 of misconduct and contraventions of the Police Services Act, how come not one suspension or charge has been laid as swiftly as charges were placed on me for far much less suspicion of breaking laws? (Equality before and under the law)
In Canada, collusion can refer to criminal activity such as bid-rigging, price-fixing, and foreign interference in political processes.
A trial judge faced with evidence of potential collusion must directly address the evidence and consider its impact on the witness’s credibility and reliability. (Special Constables & Officers included.)
I will spare you some of the full explanations of the laws we are dealing with today, but I will not cut down my email size as to miss the full extent of the allegations.
In the next week or so you will receive a device, Model # SM-f926w Serial # RFCRA1PQ6LZ IMEI 355662720584257
With instructions on how to deal with the meta data, emails, apps, analytics and passwords.
The metadata you are interested in, is what was created from officers, lawyers and courts.
I will omit nothing!
When the Crown Attorney received the 32gb SD card from me and OPS took it, there was a case before the courts. As I walked up to the Crown Attorney I asked "How would you like to have them arrested and put in jail?" The Crown Attorneysaid "Yes!" (With witnesses) The Crown then introduced me to an OPS Officer that sat me down in private and asked "What is on the card?" I not only described, I showed him. After the conversation he took the SD card and made a report, or so he told me and said "I will get this to the right people". He agreed "This needs to be known".
The next day I received a call from an Ottawa Police Officer asking to have a meeting. Then he texted me and used Signal app to ask if it was OK to have an OPP Officer present with a Professional standards person. I agreed and only two officers showed up. We had that over hour long meeting they did not want at the station. Instead, at a Tim Hortons parking lot in Kanata. I knew there was something strange about those guys when they refused to take evidence. They took a lot of notes though as I showed them crimes. The OPP Officer even apologized for not answering a call for service when I received a dead animal in my parents mailbox wrapped in newspaper with a peace sign written in permanent marker.
A death threat was "Not important enough to make the drive out to your place" is what I was told on the phone. I guess one has to be rich to get a call for service answered. BTW the OPS Officer used his phone to text me after I left to say "you forgot your sunglasses", do you think I forgot them?
I tell you that one short experience for a very solid reason. Saying something is just accusations and suspicion you do not necessarily need to investigate. But when you have evidence in hand, it becomes duty to investigate.
Officer Blondie from PLT contacted me when one of your "person of intrest" (picture #2) was threatening me and actively engaged in cyber crime, he had a duty to investigate. He contacted me, even came to shake my hand because of my peaceful and knowledgeable nature. I provided proof of exactly what he was asking for. First thing he said to me was "a relationship is built on trust". When I seen that he could not be trusted and taking no action, that was the end of our friendly relationship. Then he became retaliatory and when I went to the station to give evidence and testimony he instructed the officers there to threaten to arrest me and not take a report. Instead they kicked me out of a police station.
When considering all the factors that you will find out in your investigation, it will become very clear on the collusion.
Why the political pundits wanted to use tanks on peaceful protesters. Why before one person made it to Ottawa our Prime Minister was using "Hate speech" and creating propaganda about lawful citizens. Why the Prime Minister was not held to accountability of the law from security services even though the criminal acts were quite apparent. "Equality before and under the law".
Then there is the whole Five Eyes file on the various political parties and platforms that inserted themselves with Canada Unity and James Bauder. I bet it is quite similar to my understanding and files. Coincidentally became the people that law enforcement colluded with to achieve many things! TBOF, WEXIT, WILD ROSE, MAVERICK Party, just to name a couple, of two are proven funded by huge foreign entities engaged in political interference worldwide.
When James Bauder learned of my skillset, he contacted me to help because of what Jason Laface (or 60+ other names this guy has) was doing in the background with his servers. (Created 50 subdomains) I spent hours on the phone simultaneously with WIX & Godaddy security watching and capturing the cyber crimes in action and reported this to Officer Blondie. The kicker, LaFace was in Ottawa jurisdiction when committing the crimes not far from Blondie and even in his view within hours. Blondie that contacted me for this very person's actions failed to take action. His boss Wong or Wang said on a live video with me as he entered a room to Blondie "Why are you wasting fucking time and still on that call? End the Fucking conversation!".
Blondie knew I seen and heard him, and apologized " it is just inter office talk" is how he tried to explain it away. That interaction showed me something else though.
It got me to thinking on who these officers were in contact with on the ground in Jan-Feb of 2022. It turns out, quite a lot!
It also turns out to be a few key individuals operating with the "Persons of intrest" designation since 2022 to present, ment to create political propaganda, conflict, shock video for news purposes. For example, the TUPOC clown show downtown was much more than just idiots taking over that church. It was actually a well orchestrated and funded operation that active duty police helped to facilitate.
The JCCF lawyers facilitated an illegal communications social media room for top influencers, main stream media writers and alternative media against clients and others conditions. This so happens to be people like Tamara Lich, Chris Barber, Tom Marrazo, Daniel Bulford, and 50+ others all in the same room 24/7 for months after their arrests planning and plotting new adventures! I was invited before I knew who was in the room. Immediately after entering was told "This is fight club!" And was no joke! I did stay in the room for months and recorded everything. They even have pdf's on how to carry out and create propaganda I will provide. This is where the Crown Attorney and Police knew and did not inform the Judge . Now their cases awaiting verdict. From this information alone, their cases can be thrown out. Was that always the plan? I do not believe these people are guilty of the crimes charged with, oh but much more serious crimes in the totality. Like the Corporations Fraud of Freedom Corporation I can also prove. I requested their files at Corporations Canada and received them. Only with someone's help within Corporations Canada could they apply and be approved for non-soliciting status but also travel the world collecting donations as Directors without claiming any in their documentation and zero investigations. Totally against Canada Corporations ACT.
"The trial of the century" eh? Makes for great news and propaganda.
You could also ask the Crown Attorneys Office of communications from this email account Dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com and see where I warn them about leaving out pertinent information from active cases and closed cases.
There is no way any of this happened without political police interference outside of their duties.
I wish to make a swarn in video recorded deposition on all of it with supporting documents.
Want to see where the court, your Police Chiefs and over 300 others including the Prime Minister were warned before I was put on trial? With responses.
The best info is at the bottom of the page.
Now why would lawyers be working with Police to pressure clients to "accept deals"?
I see zero proper investigations into the creation and execution of the massive foreign politically motivated and controlled operations happening in Canada. Even the Emergencies Act Inquiry was done illegally. Picture #4 Why would anyone Judge put on record that he is not responsible for the decision?
Now, you have some sources to gather information from and a crux of the situation.
Regards,
Dana-lee Melfi
From: Perreault, Jenny C <PerreaultJ@ottawapolice.ca>
Sent: February 27, 2025 7:25 AM
To: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Confidential Police Complaint 25-0127
Good Morning Mr.Melfi,
For clarity, I’m in no way asking you to identify the officer(s) by name. My request is for you to provide the information necessary to properly identify the officers we, as the Ottawa Police, need to name as the “respondent officers” to your complaint. You mentioned several officers were involved but seem to center your complaint on the arresting officers.
Therefore, my question to you is:
· Are the arresting officers the crux of your complaint?
If so, yes, we will identify them, name them as the respondent officers in your complaint and seek the information necessary to best assist you in having your complaint investigated fully.
As indicated in my initial correspondence with you yesterday, I am the complaint intake Sergeant. I will not be the investigator.
All of the information in the 3 emails you sent me yesterday afternoon, will be attached to your complaint file.
Thank you,
Jenny
Sgt.J.Perreault
Professional Standards Branch
613-236-1222 ext 3436
From: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2025 5:10 PM
To: Perreault, Jenny C <PerreaultJ@ottawapolice.ca>;
LECA Accommodation (MAG) <LECA.Accommodation@ontario.ca
Subject: [EXTERNAL]Re: Confidential Police Complaint 25-0127
|
|
You don't often get email from dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com. Learn why this is important |
|
|
Caution:This Email is from an EXTERNAL source. Ensure you trust this sender before clicking on any links or attachments. |
Re: Confidential Police Complaint 25-0127
Dana-lee Melfi
Perreault, Jenny C;
LECA Accommodation (MAG)
Hello Sgt.J.Perreault,
With all due respect Sergeant, I have sent in additional information to the LECA with pictures and identifying markers of the individuals that pointed a rifle at my head and illegally detained and arrested me. LECA said all additional information, explanations would be shared with the investigators. Did they share the communications?
You have had this file for nine days and access to all police files on DANA-LEE MELFI. The point is, you should already know by law who the arresting officers are. I have asked for a copy of the disclosure provided to the courts and denied. I have seen it though in my lawyers office only. The officers in question were not identified in the disclosure.
I tried to do ATIP & Municipal Access to information requests on the footage to gain more information on my illegal arrest. RCMP have lied on their response to my request and City of Ottawa has outright denied the request.
The good thing here is my arrest was captured many ways. Police drone, news helicopter, journalists and many citizens.
Attached are the pictures of contact with Police Identifiers. I also provided the OPS with a 32gb SD card with much information. I had a joint meeting with OPS & OPP on March 3rd 2024 in Kanata and they took notes.
Please keep in mind the complaint is not solely about the unidentified officers and on the process itself. A great place to start questioning would be to question Officer Blondie of the PLT. Warning though, him and Wong are as crooked as apple tree branches.
I have a multitude of explanation written on my website on why I was targeted, and the process I have taken to gather information.
The one you would be interested in atm is
https://peace-man.ca/about/f/
The whole arrest was captured on a City owned camera for "Public Safety and tourism" that is being protected by Police to not get out and showing THEIR CRIMES. I have unsuccessfully put in Access to Information requests to the OPS directly and ask that you the investigative team take into consideration the importance of these requests.
Now, as per the policing act and the subsequent acts for regular officers and special constables, the officers involved were not working within the understanding of the Charter or Bill of Rights. Due to this their immunity is moot.
When going to Ottawa in January of 2022 I was not like any of the others.
I knew the proven criminal organizations like OPS, RCMP would not act accordingly. So, I went to "build a case". I specifically stood within camera view for 25 days in peace making sure never to break a law. I also seen the other side with the infiltration of the citizen led movement and is another facet of my investigations. I was able to infiltrate them in secret "Clandestine" communications rooms and much more.
To understand this method and process this is a great document read and understand. It is incomplete because I put it out to the public as a feeler to see who is paying attention. The LECA have the document, and it can be found here as the first pdf.
https://peace-man.ca/
Side note: All the officers in picture #4 where I was stood for over an hour in cuffs behind my back (I am a registered disabled person with two dislocated shoulders that informed and requested front cuffs) in -30 when I pissed from cold & fear, frozen to my leg, my medications refused, paraded for media as a criminal, are complicit in document manipulation and crimes like cruel and unusual punishment. While standing there, even the officer switched off because they were cold. I begged politely and peacefully. Then I was put in the back of a police car and the officers (with a camera active in the car) questioned me and seen how many times I have been a victim dating to my childhood. They seen I was a government employee and never convicted of breaking any laws. Told me that they were going to recommend after transport I be let free (I watched them write that note on my paper). After transport to the water works I was stripped down and refused a bathroom. Three bags of "evidence" was collected and zero inventory taken. I received two back and less $1500 in cash.
I noticed a temporary camera set up and recording during intake. Where is that footage?
I was then informed of three charges for the first time. I was informed after asking a question that I had disobeyed the "Emergencies Act" as one of the charges. My discharge saying Disobey lawful court order" and changed to "dissobey lawful order" in court. I will provide proof of both and the use of criminal code 366 "Document manipulation" Every officer there was hostile while I was cooperative and peaceful.
I have such detail that I could give layouts of the pumping station down to where the folding tables, cameras, lockup behind officers filled with evidence bags, and more are.
one lady described herself as a lawyer for the police.
She was the one that said that if I didn't sign the conditions I would be going to jail. Ottawa is my birthplace and these conditions were against the Charter.
In duress I placed an X. My Rights and Freedoms such as, freedom of conscience, expression and opinion, thought and belief, of peaceful assembly, Association, and mobility Rights all TAKEN from me. The most important that you should recognize is " equality, before and under the law" was stripped!
Yes, I have found out way more than I bargained for.
As per the ATIP ACT I could request that an investigator of a government agency can take these requests and bring to the attention of the OIC (Office of the Information Commissioner) as to determine if the requests should be done as part of the investigation. That is a next step.
So far, what you have shown is a redundant question to me on the identity of the two officers when YOUR office is the one with this answer.
Any communication and replies with OPS and I, will be sent to the LECA as per their request in email dated 10/27/2024.
I have an abundance of information regarding this LECA complaint with more than OPS involved.
My response bounced back as was over 19mb. I will send what I had to omit in a second email to Sgt.J.perreault to identify two of the officers. I cannot send the video footage.
Regards,
Dana-lee Melfi
From: Perreault, Jenny C <PerreaultJ@ottawapolice.ca>
Sent: February 26, 2025 12:07 PM
To: Dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com <D
Subject: Confidential Police Complaint 25-0127
Good Afternoon Mr.Melfi,
I am the complaint intake Sergeant with the Ottawa Police Professional Standards Unit. I have reviewed your police complaint dated 2024-10-21, as received via the Law Enforcement Complaint’s Agency and have reviewed it. My purpose in contacting you is as follows:
· In order to address your complaint, the officer(s) need to be identified.
· Are you able to please advise me as to who this complaint is directed at? (The arresting officers or otherwise). Please note, we cannot blanket approach a police complaint. It does need to be narrowed down as best as you can with regards to the involved officer(s).
Once we have the officer(s) properly identified, we can determine how best to navigate this matter with you.
I look forward to your response and thank you in advance.
Respectfully,
Jenny
Sgt.J.Perreault
Professional Standards Branch
613-236-1222 ext 3436
The contents of this e-mail, including any attachments, are intended for the exclusive use of the named recipient. This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are strictly prohibited from using, disclosing, copying, or distributing this e-mail or any of its contents. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail immediately and permanently delete this e-mail and its attachments, along with any copies thereof. Thank you for your collaboration.
The contents of this e-mail, including any attachments, are intended for the exclusive use of the named recipient. This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are strictly prohibited from using, disclosing, copying, or distributing this e-mail or any of its contents. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail immediately and permanently delete this e-mail and its attachments, along with any copies thereof. Thank you for your collaboration.
From: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 2:13 AM
Subject: Fw: LECA Complaint - Melfi, Dana-lee E-202410211407481365 screened in
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Sent: March 23, 2025 11:08 PM
To: Tkachyk, Ann (MAG) <Ann.Tkachyk@ontario.ca>; Michael.Duheme <Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Subject: Re: LECA Complaint - Melfi, Dana-lee E-202410211407481365 screened in
-
I never once received notice of a zone I could not be in Canada. No proof I had been notified.
-
I watched and recorded Ottawa Police park trucks and say directly to me it is a legal protest.
-
I believed "There is no way the Officers did not know or ought to know that the orders and actions taken were unconstitutional"
-
I was cuffed and held behind my back even after informing OPS that I am disabled and it was causing me great pain. Was refused front cuffs.
-
I was searched by Ottawa Police and three bags of inventory seized with no inventory taken or written. Was only returned two bags.
-
I was stood standing still in -30 * for over an hour while Ottawa Police officers switched off to get warm.
-
I was refused three prescription medications for pain (I take the max per day for years and you will find out), and I was laughed at when I asked.
-
I was moved into an Ottawa Police car and sat with my hands behind my back as I spoke to the officers and asked again if I could leave and have done nothing wrong. Those Officers (a man and a woman) Said they were going to agree to let me go. ( I seen the camera in the car recording as we went over my non existent criminal past. In fact I have helped Ottawa Police many times and was listed a victim.) (In the 90's trained Ottawa Police Service members in my home and worked at community stations as a pc tech)
-
Then moved to a transport and still cuffs behind my back when my arms started to become numb and in pain by this point.
-
When brought into the temporary processing center at the Waterworks I was forced to strip off my outer clothing and was having a hard time after they took cuffs off because my arms could barely move. I tried to tell and was rushed and threatened if I did not hurry.
-
The entire time I was cooperative and polite.
-
I was told if I did not sign the conditions to remove my rights of travel that I would just be brought to jail and have to deal with it from within there. I did not agree and was in great duress. I placed an X on the paper as it was my only option after seeing the way I had already been treated.
-
The carge of 127(1) " Disobey Lawful Court Order" was changed in court to "Disobey Lawful Order" (that was explained on camera that it was the Emergencies ACT)This is blatant document manipulation and made a huge difference in many cases. By Ottawa Police Service and not RCMP when it was RCMP that admittedly arrested me. "collusion" with intent to violate my Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
-
I asked to put my outdoor clothes on because it was -30 outside and was not even given that chance and pushed out the door. I asked for an address so I could call a taxi and was refused. The wind was howling and I was in great pain. But you find no fault in this?
-
The Ottawa Police Service did not include pertinent information into the disclosure or to the courts. Not only in my case but I have four case numbers that this pertinent information could have changed the course of the case. (That right there is 366 of criminal code)
-
The Ottawa Police Service and the City of Ottawa have admittedly had access to the citizen-owned camera on Wellington and Metcalfe. They purposely withheld this information from the courts as well. I tried to gain this information myself from RCMP, The City of Ottawa and OPS. RCMP lied, City denied access, and OPS refused.
-
While waiting to go to trial the interactions with the Ottawa Police Service and PLT team did not end. On video I was refused service from the Ottawa Police Service for making allegations of laws being broken by high profile individuals. The PLT team reached out to me for this information, but when they received the information they hid it.
-
The OPP refused a call for service in 2023 calling me a convoy participant. ( discrimination ) I never took part or helped in any convoy Jan 2022.
-
In March of 2024 I was in the courthouse while the justice was deciding on Tamara and Chris Barbers case. I presented the crown attorney with an SD card with documentation that would have put them in jail that day. The Ottawa Police Service intercepted that SD card and took it from me. The next day they set up a meeting between Ops and OPP. All this information has been withheld from the courts.
-
I am not an expert at holding accountability to police officers and never expected to do so. My complaint was made just weeks after I was arrested because I knew that somebody else had broken the law and treated me the way I was treated, but I never broke a law. I have never given false information on police reports or anywhere else.
-
I'm sure there's even more than I'm missing today and I had put my faith in the leca to do all of that they advertise for.
Sent: February 18, 2025 1:24 PM
To: Dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com <Dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>
Subject: LECA Complaint - Melfi, Dana-lee E-202410211407481365 screened in
Dear Dana-lee Melfi,
Please find attached correspondence regarding the above noted complaint.
Regards,
Ann
Ann Tkachyk | Senior Investigator
Law Enforcement Complaints Agency (LECA)
655 Bay Street | 10th Floor | Toronto, ON | M7A 2T4
T: 1-877-411-4773 | F: 416-327-8332
This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and contains information that may be privileged and/or confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail to the sender above, and delete this e-mail from your computer. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 8:36 PM
Subject: Fwd: Fw: I stood in honour and integrity to the letter of the law
To: <hkheir@charteradvocates.ca>, <jmanson@charteradvocates.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>, <ps.ministerofpublicsafety-ministredelasecuritepublique.sp@ps-sp.gc.ca>, fin.minfinance-financemin.fin <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, Michael.Duheme <Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
From: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 1:27 AM
Subject: Fw: I stood in honour and integrity to the letter of the law
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Sent: August 13, 2024 2:05 PM
To: VirtualCrownOttawa@
Subject: I stood in honour and integrity to the letter of the law
because I have faith in humanity to correct course for patriotism to the County & City to which I was born, it could represent any citizen not just Canadian 
, not to the left or right, to many reasons to list atm
to remind us of TIME, what our forefathers were trying to preserve and have already fought for.
heart 
& determination 
Sent: August 10, 2024 2:18 PM
To: VirtualCrownOttawa@
Subject: Not even a notification of receipt?
 |
You can find the interactive documented path at ... ACCEPTABLE?
|
Sent: July 26, 2024 7:33 PM
To: VirtualCrownOttawa@
Subject: I wish to lay a complaint on all lawyers involved and the Crown respectively
Sent: February 7, 2024 10:49 AM
To: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>; Monick Grenier <monick@grenierlaw.ca>; John Carpay <jcarpay@jccf.ca>
Subject: RE: R. v. Melfi
Mr. Melfi – I’ve received your lengthy reply, which I will not address in detail.
You apparently wish for JCCF to pay you some more money.
Please advise, once and for all, how much you believe you should be paid. I cannot respond further unless you tell me exactly how much money you believe is owing to you.
Note that my request should not be taken as an agreement that JCCF does actually owe you anything. I am simply trying to understand your position.
Thanks,
James Manson
647.977.5354 | jmanson@jccf.ca
From: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 10:23 PM
To: James Manson <jmanson@jccf.ca>; Monick Grenier <monick@grenierlaw.ca>; John Carpay <jcarpay@jccf.ca>
Subject: Re: R. v. Melfi
Mr. Manson
Respectfully,
You have met me face to face as a representative of JCCF. You know very well I am a man.
This email you sent will serve as an example on the lack of attention to detail. I do not like to be insulted.
Many assertions you have made are untrue. I have never said that JCCF owes me money nor did I approve the media release.
As a matter of fact, I have only asked JCCF to honour their agreement and to pay Ms. Grenier.
In fact I disapproved the release unless it stated the facts that JCCF
and I had a disagreement as long as you followed the current contract
still in place.
Monick Grenier and I entered into a retainer, she advised me she secured
funding and JCCF was willing to cover the estimated costs of $25, 000
and placed this in our contract. (in the end, ended up to be less than ½ of the estimate) It says that you were notified and collaborated by your media manager with me after I signed the retainer.
If you remember, I disagreed
with the very first "Media release" because it was not true. (This was a
red flag for me right off the hop)
It showed that JCCF had not done Due Diligence in writing a true and accurate depiction of Dana-lee Melfi.
I tried and was given "no choice" to disagree with the second draft. I
let it go because I needed the help. JCCF has never represented
Peace-Man.
Also in your "Media release" Peace Man was used instead of the Peace-Man
purposely "miss branding" I feel for various reasons on searching.
I have operated to the best of my abilities within the retainer
agreement. I have tried to communicate with JCCF before I said anything
public. But, the public noticed when I was honest. Two public groups
came together and asked my permission to hold a fundraiser
for me and raised $1333 in a matter of a couple hours to give directly
to my lawyer in trust "if" JCCF did not honour what they had
advertised.
Throughout I maintained we are still in that agreement. The new retainer
after my consultation with Mr. Flury was deplorable and I never respond
until he asked several weeks later if I had made a decision. He lied in
an email and to me was not ethical enough
to trust. Charter Advocates is also a new company and I have not seen
the information to go with this only other option that materialized out
of thin air.
I have communicated with my lawyer that if JCCF does not honour their
agreement then I would pay her. This is still in dispute on whether JCCF
will pay full amount of their portion of the contract. I have asked
that the bill not be paid at this time and it
be sent to JCCF. This did not happen and the trust was used before Ms.
Grenier presented you with the bill. This will be delt with between my
lawyer and myself.
You say JCCF "ultimately
assisted". At what cost to me? I was slammed in social media for JCCF
"Peace Man from Ottawa protest represented by Justice Centre against
mischief charges". Then when you gave me ultimatums
and said you stopped support on Nov 7th I spoke in public about it.
The stress and hardship for the actions of JCCF, it's lawyers, it's
clients and my defence has been deplorable to my reputation and still I
have offered in my last communication to chalk it up to a disagreement
if you honoured the agreement.
I see in todays communications several more red flags like the "R. v Melfi".
Also I will not be removing anything from public sphere and will speak openly as I wish on public matters.
To this day even as I respond JCCF, has a page up and still with a donation link in use with my image. (Attached, dated)
The new "media release" removed.
Listen, I have and am confident on my documentation to date. I did not ask for these problems as you suggest.
I held Ms. Grenier to her current retainer. She showed up and in the end
had no baring on "winning" as the Crown said nothing to that nature and
"withdrew".
I had told Ms. Grenier that I would never apply for Jordan and you miss printed this information based on what she told you I presume.
This is another part of your "Media Release" was untruthful and disappointing my lawyer did not follow that request.
"It was never a question that I would agree to put in a Jordan application and explained why in detail to Ms. Grenier"
I have remained quite clear. On the other hand it has been quite
difficult to get answers to my questions pertaining to my Contract with
both parties.
I may be direct, but I have never been rude as you suggest. I am not
grateful for the involvement of JCCF to this point , no sir.
I should have stayed with my lawyer and raised the money over this two
years myself or just pay it and cash my life insurance for a child I had
set up.
My communications are lengthy as to not miss pertinent information and not sorry you all "don't have time for this".
I wish it was not my concern as to why JCCF and my own lawyer have acted
in this manor. I will soon be under oath in testimony to disclose my
involvement with several entities. I wish it was going to go another
way. But I cannot stop nor hide the truth.
I stood for the security of the person and country and still am through
accountability with our Government, our Courts, our lawyers, Police,
HoC, DOJ, OIC, etc.
If you are scared of accountability, sorry this is not a feelings game.
Now would you like to know what I have come to learn about the
involvement into the legal cases following the "Freedom convoy" "The
protest at parliament hill Jan-Feb 2022? You will now have to wait for
the over 2000 page report being submitted. Information
on such things as JCCF lawyers possibly disregarded "privacy", "ethical
standards", "Professional Standards", "Contractual obligations", "False
advertisements" and the list goes on.
I showed proof to my lawyer of a JCCF contracted lawyer apparently
facilitating a social media room that disregarded clients conditions. I
found it to be a serious offence. Also the breach of my personal phone
number taken from my file from Eva and used for
personal gain. Asking me to help Tamara and nothing about my case. The
professional obligation was to question Eva on how and why she obtained
and used this information.
The professional obligation
after showing her proof of "Canada Freedom Rights Movement"
"Clandestine" group facilitated by Eva, Bethan and attended by Kieth
Wilson and other JCCF clients with conditions should have
been reported in Oct 22nd 2022 while she was still retained with JCCF.
The day I was invited it was called "Fight Club" "And you know what
happens if you talk about Fight Club!" as a reference to the movie where
death is the implied outcome. Very serious and the moment I was invited
felt worried. I documented over a month of communications
and documents shared in the "Media and Propaganda control room" with
PDF's to suit.
This room was used to "silence" me and will show that in the proof on
several peoples devices. I have all #'s and lots of meta data.
Again very serious concerns that I have asked for answers from both JCCF and Ms. Grenier.
Screen_Recording_20240117_
The professional standards and obligations not met. Any time I mentioned
this to JCCF and John Carpay directly it was ignored and even said to
be "not my problem". I hate to tell you, it is your problem now. I am
not interested in legal action at this time
and will let the authorities deal with it.
Why would JCCF support or represent a Corporation and individuals thereof that placed demands on a five eyes country?
Why would they use witnesses in trials that attest to being military
experts and not recognize the danger this posed to the public?
Why would these experts never asked any of these questions in the EA,
where the JCCF and Freedom Corp represented as the only citizens voice
at the EA inquiry? Then not ask the most important questions that
needed to be asked? "Misplays of the week CTV" is
totally correct for a change.
I do not worry about any of my actions to date as is all documented.
You fight for Constitutional Rights and Freedoms right?
I ask you one more time. Please pay your portion of the agreed contract in full as soon as possible.
Please understand I never asked JCCF to forward me any money. So a redundant statement at the end of your email for some reason.
I wish for a reply concerning your final choice in this matter promptly from all parties.
Thank you,
Dana-lee Melfi
Peace-Man
Dana_lee_ca@Hotmail.com
613-570-8990
I advise you, I will be sharing all communications with Law Society of
Manitoba, Law Society of Ontario in the near future as I told you and
Ms. Grenier previously. I am advised it may be shared with the Kings
Bench.
From: James Manson <jmanson@jccf.ca>
Sent: February 6, 2024 12:32 PM
To: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>
Cc: Monick Grenier <monick@grenierlaw.ca>;
John Carpay <jcarpay@jccf.ca>
Subject: R. v. Melfi
Mr. Melfi:
Greetings. John Carpay has asked me to respond to your recent e-mail, dated February 2, 2024.
I have reviewed your e-mail. It appears that, among other things, you are advancing two grievances. First, you appear to take offence at a press release put out by JCCF in connection with the successful defence of your criminal case. This was even though my understanding is that the press release was approved by you and/or your counsel, Ms. Melfi, in advance of it going out.
Second, you appear to believe that JCCF owes you money, despite the fact that JCCF ultimately assisted you financially with your criminal defence. As you will agree, you were ultimately able to present your defence with the assistance of Ms. Grenier, who was the counsel that you insisted on having.
Mr. Melfi, I am not inclined to get into an argument with you. You have been successful in your criminal case, which is great news. I am glad that JCCF was able to render assistance to you. Frankly I don’t quite understand why you are not happy with the outcome.
At any rate, given that you appear to take issue with the press release, I can report that JCCF will be removing it now from its website. We will no longer be referring to you or your case. There will be no further publicity concerning you. Please also remove all reference to JCCF on your own website(s) and social media materials as well.
Secondly, please also understand that JCCF will not be forwarding you any money.
I wish you all the best in your future endeavours.
Best regards,
James Manson
Director of Legal Services
Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms
#253, 7620 Elbow Drive SW
Calgary, AB T2V 1K2
T/F:647.977.5354 | E: jmanson@jccf.ca
*Working in Toronto, Ontario
NOTICE
OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail message, including any attachment(s),
is intended only for the addressee, and may contain information that is
legally privileged,
confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
review, transmission, dissemination or other use of, or the taking of
any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities
other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited
and does not constitute waiver of privilege. If you have received this
communication in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please
immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail message. Thank you.
TRANSMISSION PROBLEMS: In the event of transmission problems, please contact James Manson at 647.977.5354.
No comments:
Post a Comment