Quite frankly all Canadians would be as thoroughly disgusted as I am if they had witnessed firsthand the actions of politicians, lawyers and judges. Perhaps the precious few folks who read this blog will be as pissed off as I. However methinks all the smiling bastards in CBC should be nervous that I don't sue them personally after they review my emails to them and check their work which is found below N'esy Pas Nasty Norman Sabourin, Mindless Marc Giroux, Little Billy Penteny and the latest LIEbrano Justice Minister Jody Wilson Rabould?
---------- Original message ----------
From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada mcu@justice.gc.ca
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 15:56:02 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re the CBA, the RCMP, Federal Court File # T-1557-15 and the Hearing before the Federal Court of Appeal on May 24th 2017
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be carefully reviewed.
-------------------
Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, ministre de la justice et procureur général du Canada.
En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance adressée à la ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu avec soin.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:31:32 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re the CROWN'S SECOND QUERY about a Joint
Book of Authorites for its Cross Appeal within the Federal Court of
Appeal File No. A-48-16
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
of Parliament for Vancouver Granville and Minister of Justice and
Attorney General of Canada.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
addressed to the Hon. Jody Wilson-Raybould, please note that there may
be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your message
will be carefully reviewed.
-------------------
Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e pour
Vancouver Granville et ministre de la justice et procureur g?n?ral du
Canada.
En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
adress?e ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, veuillez prendre note
qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel.
Nous tenons ? vous assurer que votre message sera lu avec soin.
From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 14:31:32 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re the CROWN'S SECOND QUERY about a Joint
Book of Authorites for its Cross Appeal within the Federal Court of
Appeal File No. A-48-16
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
of Parliament for Vancouver Granville and Minister of Justice and
Attorney General of Canada.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
addressed to the Hon. Jody Wilson-Raybould, please note that there may
be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your message
will be carefully reviewed.
-------------------
Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e pour
Vancouver Granville et ministre de la justice et procureur g?n?ral du
Canada.
En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
adress?e ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, veuillez prendre note
qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel.
Nous tenons ? vous assurer que votre message sera lu avec soin.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 20:18:20 +0000
Subject: RE: ATT Norman Sabourin Please review the cover letter that came with many documents I sent you and explain why you have never responded to me
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos commentaires.
---------- Original message ----------
From: William Brooks william.brooks@fja-cmf.gc.ca
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 16:21:58 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE Justice Camp malicious nonsense versus
the RCMP, Peter MacKay Federal Court, the Canadian Judicial Council
and its cover up of the Monumental Newfy sexual abuse issues
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
My term as Commissioner ended on August 14, 2016. Marc Giroux, Deputy
Commissioner, will be acting as Commissioner. He may be contacted at
613-947-1875 or at
marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca.
If you wish to contact me personally, I may be reached at
wm.brooks@sympatico.ca
__________________________________________________________
Mon mandat de commissaire a pris fin le 14 août 2016. Le
sous-commissaire Marc Giroux agira donc comme commissaire. Vous pouvez
communiquer avec lui au 613-947-1875 ou à
marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca
Vous pouvez communiquer avec moi à titre personnel à
wm.brooks@sympatico.ca.
Bill Brooks
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 16:16:48 -0400
Subject: ATT Norman Sabourin Please review the cover letter that came with many documents I sent you and explain why you have never responded to me
To: Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca, marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, mcu@justice.gc.ca
Gib van Ert
Executive Legal Officer:
Supreme Court of Canada
Supreme Court Bldg.
301 Wellington St.
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0J1
Phone: 613-996-9296
Fax: 613-952-3092
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2016/09/re-justice-camp-malicious-nonsense.html
July 31st, 2005
Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin,
C/o Norman Sabourin General Counsel and
Andrew Grant and Renée Maria Tremblay
Canadian Judicial Council
150 Metcalfe Street,
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W8
Shirley Heafey Chair of Commission
for Public Complaints against the RCMP
P.O. Box 3423 Station "D"
Ottawa, ON K1P 6L4
RE: Rampant Public Corruption
Hey,
Pursuant to my recent phone calls to Norman Sabourin and various
underlings of Shirley Heafey within the Commission for Public
Complaints against the RCMP over the years plus my many faxes and
emails please find enclosed exactly the same material received by
every Attorney General in Canada over the past year. The CD which is a
copy of a police surveillance wiretap tape # 139 is served upon you as
officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.
As you can see I have enclosed a copy of a letter sent to the latest
Attorney General Mr. Wally Opal in BC. Perhaps he should take a little
trip to Surrey and ask your office some hard questions. Perhaps the
ghost of my fellow Independent politician, Chuck Cadman may wish to
answer few questions now as well. Hard telling not knowing.
I will not bother you with the details of what I am sending to
you byway of the certified US Mail because I will be serving identical
material to many other Canadian Authorities in hand and tell them I
gave this stuff to you first and enclose a copy of this letter. All
that is important to me right now is that I secure proof that this
mail was sent before I make my way back home to the Maritimes. However
I will say I am also enclosing a great deal more material than what
Allan Rock had received in the UN. Some of it is in fact the same
material the two maritime lawyers, Rob Moore and Franky Boy McKenna in
particular received, while I was up home running for Parliament last
year. Things have changed greatly in the past year so I have also
included a few recent items to spice thing up for you. I am tired of
trying to convince people employed in law enforcement to uphold the
law. So all I will say for now is deal will your own conscience and be
careful how you respond to this letter. If you do not respond. Rest
assured I will do my best to sue you some day. Ignorance is no excuse
to the law or me.
Veritas Vincit
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave
Milton, MA. 02186
Label/Receipt Number: ED71 7170 484U S
Detailed Results:
Delivered Abroad, August 11, 2005, 6:49 am, CANADA
Out of Foreign Customs, August 08, 2005, 2:37 pm, CANADA
Into Foreign Customs, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
Arrived Abroad, August 04, 2005, 1:52 pm, CANADA
International Dispatch, August 03, 2005, 8:32 am, KENNEDY AMC
Enroute, August 03, 2005, 8:30 am, JAMAICA, NY 11499
Acceptance, August 02, 2005, 10:40 am, QUINCY, MA 02169
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 00:10:57 -0400
Subject: Yo Norman Sabourin do you think the Canadian Judicial Council or the Supreme Court of Canada will ever read the documents I sent you byway of registered US Mail in August off 2005?
To: maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca, david@lutz.nb.ca, matthew.smith@lutz.nb.ca,
maria.powell@lutz.nb.ca, michael.bray@fosterandcompany.com, serge.rousselle@gnb.ca, david.eidt@gnb.ca, kirk.macdonald@gnb.ca, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, mrichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, george.oram@gnb.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca, Craig Munroe cmunroe@glgmlaw.com, pm@pm.gc.ca
Cc: motomaniac02186@yahoo.com, Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca, marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca
---------- Original message ----------
From: Craig Munroe cmunroe@glgmlaw.com
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 16:06:27 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Federal Court File no T-1557-15 Trust that a lot of your assistants and some of your cumputers cannot deny my attempt to contact parliamentarians today N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for your e-mail. I am currently out of the province in meetings and will be returning on Monday, February 1. As a result, I will be unable to respond as quickly as I would like.
If you have an urgent matter, please contact my assistant, Cassandra Trivisano, at ctrivisano@glgmlaw.com.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 00:14:35 +000
Subject: RE: Here ya go folks please enjoy the hearing today in Federal Court and the notes I read from as I argued the Queen's sneaky little minions who think they are above the law and the rest of us as well
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.
---------- Original message ----------
From: NATALIA OLIVEIRA JOHNSTON natalia.johnston@cbc.ca
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 17:13:10 -0700
Subject: Out of office Re: Here ya go folks please enjoy the hearing
today in Federal Court and the notes I read from as I argued the
Queen's sneaky little minions who think they are above the law and the
rest of us as well
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Please note that I'm on annual leave and will return on May 29.
If your matter is urgent, please contact the reception line at 416-205-3216.
--
*Natalia Johnston*
Legal Assistant
to Dustin Milligan, Katarina Germani and Azim Remani
Tel. (416) 205-2306
May 24th
https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
April 3rd
https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)" Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 11:53:02 +0000
Subject: RE: Norman Sabourin, executive director of the Canadian Judicial Council launches 'Potential misconduct' probe but only after his associates in the Crown Corp CBC exposes hiis pals???
To: David Amos
assured that your email will be reviewed.
Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/tax-judge-kpmg-madrid-1.4023995
FIFTH ESTATE
Tax court judge recuses himself from KPMG-linked trial after CBC revelations
Randall Bocock attended party hosted by law firm that endorsed KPMG tax scheme
By Frédéric Zalac, Harvey Cashore, CBC News Posted: Mar 14, 2017 11:27 AM ET
Justice Randall Bocock travelled to Madrid last year to
attend conference put on by the International Fiscal Association and
attended a cocktail party hosted by a law firm linked to a KPMG tax
scheme. (McMaster University)
A federal tax court judge has recused himself from a high-profile case involving accounting giant KPMG following revelations by the CBC that he attended an exclusive party in Europe sponsored by the law firm alleged to have signed off on what authorities later decried as an offshore tax "sham."
The fifth estate and Radio-Canada's Enquête program revealed that Justice Randall Bocock, while at an international tax conference last fall in Madrid, took part in a "cocktail reception" hosted by Dentons, a law firm with offices in Canada and around the world.
Bocock was, until this week, managing the case of a wealthy Victoria family that used a KPMG-devised scheme the Canada Revenue Agency says "intended to deceive" the taxman, although he was not expected to be the judge presiding over the actual trial.
"I am recusing myself as case management judge in respect of these appeals," the justice wrote in a "recusal order" posted on the tax court's website.
- Tax court judge attended party hosted by law firm linked to KPMG
- 'Potential misconduct' probe launched into judges after CBC revelations
- Watch The Untouchables on CBC-TV's the fifth estate
"My wife and I briefly attended that reception, open to conference attendees and their guests," Justice Bocock wrote. "I was aware of all these facts, but not the fact that law firm … was referenced anywhere in these appeals."
Bocock insisted he was unaware of Dentons' role in the case until the fifth estate broadcast.
However, documents filed in the Tax Court of Canada state that Dentons — at the time known as Fraser Milner Casgrain — provided "written opinions" as part of the approval process before the KPMG scheme was implemented in 1999.
Eugene Rossiter, chief justice of the Tax
Court of Canada, will name Randall Bocock’s replacement in the trial
into a KPMG tax plan used by wealthy Canadians. Rossiter had previously
defended Bocock’s activities in Madrid where he attended social events
during a KPMG-linked tax conference. (Tax Court of Canada)
In court filings, the Canada Revenue Agency has alleged that the Isle of Man scheme was a "sham" that "intended to deceive" the federal treasury
Last week, the Canadian Judicial Council, which oversees federally appointed judges in Canada, announced it was launching an investigation into Bocock and two other judges cited in the investigative programs.
- For tips on this story email investigations@cbc.ca or phone Harvey Cashore at 416-526-4704
"I think now we delve into the area of potential conflict of interest," Norman Sabourin, executive director of the council, told the fifth estate after watching the fifth estate and Enquête.
In his recusal order, Justice Bocock cited the pending investigation — which he described as "fair and appropriate" — as another reason for stepping aside.
"Justice must be done and seen to be done," he wrote.
André Lareau, a Laval University professor and tax law expert who testified at the House of Commons inquiry into the KPMG affair, said judges have to be extremely careful.
"Even if we were to think the judge had no conversations at that cocktail, he should not put himself in a situation where he risks being under the influence or even the appearance of influence," he said.
Bocock's replacement in the trial will be selected by Eugene Rossiter, the chief justice of the Tax Court of Canada, who had previously defended Bocock's activities in Madrid.
"I am satisfied that Justice Bocock did not place himself in a conflict of interest by briefly attending a reception that was open to all participants of an international tax conference," Justice Rossiter wrote in an email to the fifth estate.
In an earlier email, Rossiter's office told the fifth estate that Bocock attended two receptions in Madrid, but declined to say which ones. The chief justice also said two other tax court justices attended the KPMG-sponsored conference, but would not indicate who they were.
Tax court chief justice under review
Rossiter himself is now one of the three judges under review by the Canadian Judicial Council — in his case, for comments he made about the practice of judges on his tax court drinking alcohol at social events with tax industry officials.
"We will have pizza and we will have wine and lots of it," Rossiter said at a recent tax conference in Calgary to what conference organizers in a tweet described as "massive applause."
After CBC/Radio-Canada reported those remarks, Norman Sabourin of the Canadian Judicial Council declined to comment on Rossiter's remarks, except to say that chief justices in particular must "set ethical aspirations."
He said there can be occasions when judges and lawyers get together for drinks without there being anything inappropriate.
The Canadian Judicial Council's review could take up to two months.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/judges-probe-potential-misconduct-1.4013170
FIFTH ESTATE
'Potential misconduct' probe launched into judges after CBC revelations
Tax court justice seen on video attending KPMG-linked party
By Harvey Cashore, Kimberly Ivany, Nicole McCormick, Gillian Findlay, CBC News
Tax court chief defends socializing with tax industry
00:00
00:17
Tax court chief defends socializing with tax industry
0:17
The Canadian Judicial Council began the review following the documentaries that showed two judges attending evening social events during a KPMG-sponsored tax conference in Madrid last fall. A third judge, the chief justice of the Tax Court of Canada, was revealed making a speech in which he promoted drinking alcohol with the tax industry.
"I decided that it was important to initiate a review of the situation," Norman Sabourin, executive director of the council, said Tuesday, citing "potential conflict of interest."
Norman Sabourin, executive director of the
Canadian Judicial Council, says he 'decided that it was important to
initiate a review of the situation.' (CBC)
The judges under review are Eugene Rossiter, chief justice of the Tax Court of Canada; Randall Bocock, a Tax Court of Canada judge; and Denis Pelletier, a judge with the Federal Court of Appeal, which hears appeals of tax court cases.
the fifth estate called and emailed the Tax Court of Canada and the Federal Court of Appeal for comment on the investigation. By Tuesday evening, CBC received no response.
- Watch "The Untouchables" on CBC's the fifth estate
- Tax court judge attended party hosted by law firm linked to KPMG
- Wealthy Canadians exposed in KPMG offshore tax 'sham'
- For tips on this story, email investigations@cbc.ca or phone Harvey Cashore at 416-526-4704
Is there a conflict of interest?
Sabourin told CBC News he has already informed the three judges of the review process, described by the council as an initial "investigation."That investigation, which could take up to two months, could end there or, if unresolved, the matter could be referred to a special review panel.
- KPMG offshore tax dodge a 'facade' designed to hide money, ex-client says
- KPMG offshore 'sham deceived tax authorities, CRA alleges
"I think now we delve into the area of potential conflict of interest. And again, I can't comment on specific cases, and that's why we need to do a review in this particular instance to find out all the facts, to find out if there is a possibility of a conflict of interest."
Eugene Rossiter, chief justice of the Tax
Court of Canada, will name Randall Bocock’s replacement in the trial
into a KPMG tax plan used by wealthy Canadians. Rossiter had previously
defended Bocock’s activities in Madrid where he attended social events
during a KPMG-linked tax conference. (Tax Court of Canada)
"We will have coffee and we will have pizza and we will have wine and lots of it," he said before hundreds of accountants, lawyers and other members of the tax industry from across Canada.
Sabourin declined to comment on those remarks, except to say that chief justices in particular have a duty to "set ethical aspirations."
"Chief justices of course are considered to be role models. They are the members of the Canadian Judicial Council. They set the ethical aspirations for judges collectively."
He said there can be occasions when judges and lawyers get together for drinks without there being anything inappropriate.
'Good exchanges can take place'
"If the wine at some point is paid by the bar, the next day is paid by the bench, these are normal gatherings where good exchanges can take place."
At an international tax conference in Madrid last fall, CBC cameras captured one of Rossiter's judges, Randall Bocock, attending an evening soiree on a rooftop terrace sponsored by a law firm linked to KPMG.
Justice Randall Bocock travelled to Madrid last year to attend conference put on by the International Fiscal Association. (CBC)
The law firm hosting the Madrid party, Dentons, is named in those court documents as allegedly signing off on the KPMG tax dodge before it was sold to wealthy Canadians.
Bocock is currently the case management judge in the Vancouver tax court case and will likely not be the judge presiding over the actual trial. No trial date has been set.
Federal Court of Appeal Judge Denis Pelletier is seen exiting Madrid’s Prado Museum. (CBC)
Pelletier initially denied attending any of the conference's evening social events. The Federal Court of Appeal later clarified that there had been a "miscommunication" and that he did in fact attend.
- For tips on this story, email investigations@cbc.ca or phone Harvey Cashore at 416-526-4704
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 18:22:05 -0400
Subject: Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15 Did you order Harper and the NDP to ignore me as well???
To: Liberal / Assistance nbd_cna@liberal.ca, cmunroe@glgmlaw.com, pm pm@pm.gc.ca, justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca
Cc: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
How about Dizzy Lizzy May and the Bloc?
On 1/6/16, Cmunroe (Liberal / Assistance) nbd_cna@liberal.ca wrote:
>
> RealChange.ca | DuVraiChangement.ca
>
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Cmunroe, Jan 6, 14:28
>
> Hello all,
>
> I would ask that you please do not respond to this e-mail (in the event that
> you were inclined to do so.)
>
> Let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
>
> Regards,
>
> Craig Munroe
> (Party Legal and Constitutional Advisor)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 11:09 AM
> To: Craig Munroe cmunroe@glgmlaw.com; nbd_cna@liberal.ca;
> pm@pm.gc.ca; ljulien@liberal.ca; pmilliken@cswan.com;
> bdysart@smss.com; bdysart@stewartmckelvey.com;
> Braeden.Caley@vancouver.ca; robert.m.schuett@schuettlaw.com;
> jda@nf.aibn.com; eclark@coxandpalmer.com; office@liberal.ns.ca;
> president@lpco.ca; david@lpcm.ca; emerchant@merchantlaw.com
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com; assistance@liberal.ca;
> Karine Fortin info@ndp.ca; stephen.harper.a1@parl.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Attn Dr. John Gillis Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15 Trust
> that I called and tried to reason with a lot of Liberals begore I am before
> the court again on Monday Jan 11th
>
> On 1/6/16, David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> BTW the nice guys who talked to me and didn't dismiss me I put in the
>> BCC line
>>
>> Dr. John Gillis
>> P.O. Box 723
>> 5151 George Street, Suite 1400
>> Halifax, Nova Scotia
>> Canada B3J 2T3
>> Tel: (902) 429-1993
>> Email: office@liberal.ns.ca
>>
>> John Allan, President
>> Liberal Party of Newfoundland & Labrador
>> T: (709) 685-1230
>> jda@nf.aibn.com
>>
>> Braeden Caley
>> Office of the Mayor, City of Vancouver
>> 604-809-9951
>> Braeden.Caley@vancouver.ca,
>>
>> Britt Dysart QC
>> Suite 600, Frederick Square
>> 77 Westmorland Street
>> P.O. Box 730
>> Fredericton, NB, Canada
>> E3B 5B4
>> P 506.443.0153
>> F 506.443.9948
>>
>> Evatt F. A. Merchant
>> Merchant Law Group LLP
>> First Nations Bank Bldg.
>> 501-224 4th Ave. S.
>> Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7K 5M5
>> Phone: 306-653-7777
>> Email: emerchant@merchantlaw.com
>>
>> Ewan W. Clark
>> Montague
>> Phone: (902) 838-5275
>> Fax: (902) 838-3440
>> eclark@coxandpalmer.com
>>
>> Robert M. Schuett
>> #200, 602 11th Avenue SW
>> Calgary Alberta T2R 1J8
>> Phone: (403) 705-1261
>> Fax: (403) 705-1265
>> robert.m.schuett@schuettlaw.com
>>
>> http://www.liberal.ca/national-board-of-directors/
>>
>> Who are we?
>>
>> We are volunteers from across the country who care passionately about
>> Canada’s future and promoting Liberal values. We are community
>> leaders, parents, and professionals who volunteer our time in this
>> role. The board works together to provide oversight and guidance to
>> the Party in matters both fiduciary, and strategic. We meet regularly
>> in person and by phone with the objective of ensuring the Party is
>> prepared for the next federal election. It is an honour to work with
>> such a distinct and talented group of individuals. Please don’t
>> hesitate to reach out to us at nbd_cna@liberal.ca.
>> Anna Gainey
>>
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada
>>
>> T @annamgainey
>> Leader Justin Trudeau
>> National President Anna Gainey
>> Acting National Director Christina Topp
>> National Vice-President (English) Chris MacInnes
>> National Vice-President (French) Marie Tremblay
>> National Policy Chair Maryanne Kampouris
>> National Membership Secretary Leanne Bourassa
>> Past National President Mike Crawley
>> President, Liberal Party of Newfoundland & Labrador John Allan
>> President, Liberal Party of Prince Edward Island Ewan Clark
>> President, Nova Scotia Liberal Party John Gillis
>> President, New Brunswick Liberal Association Britt Dysart
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Québec) Linda Julien
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Ontario) Tyler Banham
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Manitoba) Sachit Mehra
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Saskatchewan) Evatt Merchant
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Alberta) Robbie Schuett
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (British Columbia) Braeden Caley
>> President, Federal Liberal Association of Yukon Blake Rogers
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Northwest Territories) Rosanna Nicol
>> President, Federal Liberal Association of Nunavut Michel Potvin
>> Caucus Representative Francis Scarpaleggia
>> Co-Chair, Aboriginal Peoples’ Commission (Female) Caitlin Tolley
>> Co-Chair, Aboriginal Peoples’ Commission (Male) Kevin Seesequasis
>> President, National Women’s Liberal Commission Carlene Variyan
>> President, Young Liberals of Canada Justin Kaiser
>> Co-Chair, Senior Liberals’ Commission (French) Anne Adams
>> Co-Chair, Senior Liberals’ Commission (English) Kenneth D. Halliday
>> Chair, Council of Presidents Veena Bhullar
>> Chief Financial Officer Chuck Rifici
>> Chief Revenue Officer Stephen Bronfman
>> CEO, Federal Liberal Agency of Canada Mike Eizenga
>> National Campaign Co-Chair Katie Telford
>> Constitutional and Legal Adviser (English) Craig Munroe
>> Constitutional and Legal Adviser (French) Elise Bartlett
>>
>> Craig T. Munroe, Partner
>> Email: cmunroe@glgmlaw.com
>> Phone: (604) 891-1176
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 19:32:00 -0400
>> Subject: Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15 the CBC, the RCMP, their
>> new boss Justin Trudeau and his Ministers of Justice and Defence etc
>> cannot deny their knowledge of Paragraphs 81, 82, 83, 84, and 85 now
>> CORRECT G$?
>> To: Paul.Samyn@freepress.mb.ca, "carolyn.bennett"
>> carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca, Doug@dougeyolfson.ca,
>> doug.eyolfson@parl.gc.ca, fpcity@freepress.mb.ca,
>> w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca, "Paul.Lynch" Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca,
>> "Marianne.Ryan" Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, sunrayzulu
>> sunrayzulu@shaw.ca, mcu mcu@justice.gc.ca, dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca,
>> "john.green" john.green@gnb.ca, chiefape chiefape@gmail.com
>> Cc: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, gopublic
>> gopublic@cbc.ca, oldmaison oldmaison@yahoo.com, radical
>> radical@radicalpress.com, newsonline newsonline@bbc.co.uk,
>> newsroom newsroom@globeandmail.ca, nmoore nmoore@bellmedia.ca,
>> andre andre@jafaust.com
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.
>> html
>>
>> David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15
>>
>> 81. The Plaintiff states that matters of harassment that the police
>> refuse to investigate would have entered the realm of ridiculous in
>> 2012 if the reasons behind the suicides of teenagers did not become
>> well known by the corporate media. In the summer of 2012 a new member
>> of the FPS who as a former member of the EPS had inspired a lawsuit
>> for beating a client in Edmonton called the Plaintiff and accused him
>> of something he could not do even if he wanted to while he was arguing
>> many lawyers byway of emails about a matter concerning cyber stalking
>> that was before the SCC. The member of the FPF accused the Plaintiff
>> of calling the boss of Bullying Canada thirty times. At that time his
>> MagicJack account had been hacked and although he could receive
>> incoming calls, the Plaintiff could not call out to anyone. The
>> Plaintiff freely sent the FPF his telephone logs sourced from
>> MagicJack after his account restored without the Crown having to issue
>> a warrant to see his telephone records. He asked the FPF and the RCMP
>> where did the records of his phone calls to and from the FPF and the
>> RCMP go if his account had not been hacked. The police never
>> responded. Years later a Troll sent Dean Roger Ray a message through
>> YouTube providing info about the Plaintiff’s MagicJack account with
>> the correct password. Dean Roger Ray promptly posted two videos in
>> YouTube clearly displaying the blatant violation of privacy likely to
>> protect himself from the crime. The Plaintiff quickly pointed out the
>> videos to the RCMP and they refused to investigate as usual. At about
>> the same point in time the Plaintiff noticed that the CBC had
>> published a record of a access to information requests. On the list of
>> requests he saw his name along with several employees of CBC and the
>> boss of Bullying Canada. The Plaintiff called the CBC to make
>> inquiries about what he saw published on the Internet. CBC told him it
>> was none of his business and advised him if he thought his rights had
>> been offended to file a complaint. It appears the Plaintiff that
>> employees of CBC like other questionable Crown Corporations such as
>> the RCMP rely on their attorneys far too much to defend them from
>> litigation they invite from citizens they purportedly serve. The
>> employees of CBC named within the aforementioned and the CBC Legal
>> Dept. are very familiar with the Plaintiff and of the Crown barring
>> him from legislative properties while he running for public office.
>>
>> 82. The Plaintiff states that any politician or police officer should
>> have seen enough of Barry Winter’s WordPress blog by June 22, 2015
>> particularly after the very unnecessary demise of two men in Alberta
>> because of the incompetence of the EPS. Barry Winters was blogging
>> about the EPS using battering ram in order to execute a warrant for a
>> 250 dollar bylaw offence at the same time Professor Kris Wells
>> revealed in a televised interview that the EPS member who was killed
>> was the one investigating the cyber harassment of him. It was obvious
>> why the police and politicians ignored all the death threats, sexual
>> harassment, cyberbullying and hate speech of a proud Zionist who
>> claimed to be a former CF officer who now working for the Department
>> of National Defence (DND). It is well known that no politician in
>> Canada is allowed to sit in Parliament as a member of the major
>> parties unless they support Israel. Since 2002 the Plaintiff made it
>> well known that he does not support Israeli actions and was against
>> the American plan to make war on Iraq. On Aril 1, 2003 within two
>> weeks of the beginning of the War on Iraq, the US Secret Service
>> threatened to practice extraordinary rendition because false
>> allegations of a Presidential threat were made against him by an
>> American court. However, the Americans and the Crown cannot deny that
>> what he said in two courts on April 1, 2003 because he published the
>> recordings of what was truly said as soon as he got the court tapes.
>> The RCMP knows those words can still be heard on the Internet today.
>> In 2009, the Plaintiff began to complain of Barry Winters about
>> something far more important to Canada as nation because of Winters’
>> bragging of being one of 24 CF officers who assisted the Americans in
>> the planning the War on Iraq in 2002. In the Plaintiff’s humble
>> opinion the mandate of the DND is Defence not Attack. He is not so
>> naive to think that such plans of war do not occur but if Barry
>> Winters was in fact one of the CF officers who did so then he broke
>> his oath to the Crown the instant he bragged of it in his blog. If
>> Winters was never an officer in the CF then he broke the law by
>> impersonating an officer. The Plaintiff downloaded the emails of the
>> Privy Council about Wikileaks. The bragging of Barry Winters should
>> have been investigated in 2009 before CBC reported that documents
>> released by WikiLeaks supported his information about Canadian
>> involvement in the War on Iraq.
>>
>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>
>> January 13, 2015
>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>
>> December 8, 2014
>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>
>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>
>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>
>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>> campaign of 2006.
>>
>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>
>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>
>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>
>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>> essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An
>> ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear
>> and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,”
>> or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of
>> terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states
>> “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of
>> Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an
>> ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the
>> Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
>>
>> One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty
>> was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the
>> amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time
>> denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time
>> self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of
>> “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the
>> G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious
>> behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister
>> Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully
>> cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits
>> are not.
>>
>> Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal
>> mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the
>> world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy”
>> David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security
>> and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can
>> and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing
>> “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war
>> criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending
>> tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
>>
>> In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
>> “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
>> successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing,
>> marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian
>> military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern
>> equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are
>> antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five
>> years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that
>> won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
>>
>> My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
>> Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin
>> Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not
>> served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social
>> democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and
>> other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet
>> these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to
>> other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
>>
>> Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security,
>> and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before
>> shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
>>
>> Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now
>>
>> From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
>> Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and
>> the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still
>> alive
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
>> your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply
>> to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
>> Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the
>> War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
>> To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil,
>> Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, john.adams@cse-cst.gc.ca,
>> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, stoffp1 stoffp1@parl.gc.ca,
>> dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca,
>> milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca,
>> sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir birgir@althingi.is, smari
>> smari@immi.is, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm
>> susan@blueskystrategygroup.com, Don@blueskystrategygroup.com,
>> eugene@blueskystrategygroup.com, americas@aljazeera.net
>> Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice" Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca, "terry.seguin"
>> terry.seguin@cbc.ca, acampbell acampbell@ctv.ca, whistleblower
>> whistleblower@ctv.ca
>>
>> I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David
>> Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's
>> Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on
>> CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To
>> be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested
>> that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise
>> if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else
>> about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact that your
>> old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English
>> never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is
>> interesting though
>>
>> http://www.blueskystrategygroup.com/index.php/team/don-newman/
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/media/story/2010/05/04/al-jazeera-english-
>> launch.html
>>
>> Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
>> this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
>> Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad
>> Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
>>
>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
>>
>> The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a
>> shy political animal
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>> Enjoy Mr Weston
>> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/news/story/2011/05/15/weston-iraq-invasion-w
>> ikileaks.html
>>
>> "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
>> brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
>> says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
>> to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
>> including a Canadian general.
>>
>> That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
>> who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
>> U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was
>> also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
>> prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
>>
>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2010/06/canada-and-united-states.html
>>
>> "I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
>> being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
>> demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
>> "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
>> into the US policy.
>>
>> At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
>> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
>> in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
>> report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was
>> never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
>> were deployed WMD.
>>
>> Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
>> invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
>> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
>> (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
>> about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
>> that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
>> authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
>>
>> There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
>> its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
>> to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
>> folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
>> upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions
>> are to met before US troop can redeploy? Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of
>> Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them
>> correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the
>> George W Bush administration was onerous
>>
>> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
>> military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
>> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
>> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
>> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
>> operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
>> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
>> ....not necessarily in that order. "
>>
>> You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
>> Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
>>
>> http://www.socom.mil/SOCOMHome/Pages/ContactUSSOCOM.aspx
>>
>>
>> 84. The Plaintiff states that the RCMP is well aware that he went to
>> western Canada in 2104 at the invitation of a fellow Maritimer in
>> order to assist in his attempt to investigate the murders of many
>> people in Northern BC. The Plaintiff has good reasons to doubt his
>> fellow Maritimer’s motives. The fact that he did not tell the
>> Plaintiff until he had arrived in BC that he had invited a Neo Nazi he
>> knew the Plaintiff strongly disliked to the same protest that he was
>> staging in front of the court house in Prince George on August 21,
>> 2014. The Plaintiff was looking forward to meeting Lonnie Landrud so
>> he ignored the Neo Nazi. Several months after their one and only
>> meeting, Lonnie Landrud contacted the Plaintiff and asked him to
>> publish a statement of his on the Internet and to forward it to anyone
>> he wished. The Plaintiff obliged Landrud and did an investigation of
>> his own as well. He has informed the RCMP of his opinion of their
>> actions and has done nothing further except monitor the criminal
>> proceedings the Crown has placed against the Neo Nazi in BC and save
>> his videos and webpages and that of his associates. The words the
>> Plaintiff stated in public in Prince George BC on August 21, 2014 were
>> recorded by the Neo Nazi and published on the Internet and the RCMP
>> knows the Plaintiff stands by every word. For the public record the
>> Plaintiff truly believes what Lonnie Landrud told him despite the fact
>> that he does not trust his Neo Nazi associates. Therefore the
>> Plaintiff had no ethical dilemma whatsoever in publishing the
>> statement Lonnie Landrud mailed to him in a sincere effort to assist
>> Lonnie Landrud’s pursuit of justice. The Crown is well aware that
>> Plaintiff’s former lawyer, Barry Bachrach once had a leader of the
>> American Indian Movement for a client and that is why he ran against
>> the former Minister of Indian Affairs for his seat in the 39th
>> Parliament.
>>
>> 85. The Plaintiff states that while he was out west he visited
>> Edmonton AB several times and met many people. He visited the home of
>> Barry Winters and all his favourite haunts in the hope of meeting in
>> person the evil person who had been sexually harassing and threatening
>> to kill him and his children for many years. The Crown cannot deny
>> that Winters invited him many times. On June 13, 2015 Barry Winters
>> admitted the EPS warned him the Plaintiff was looking for him.
>>
>> On 12/21/15, David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Rabson, Mia" Mia.Rabson@freepress.mb.ca
>>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 20:45:36 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Wab Kinew
>>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>
>>> I will be out of the office until Monday, January 4.
>>> If you need immediate assistance please contact our city desk at 613
>>> 697 7292 or fpcity@freepress.mb.ca.
>>> Happy Holidays!
>>>
>>> Mia Rabson
>>> Parliamentary Bureau Chief
>>> Winnipeg Free Press
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Sarra R. Deane" s.deane@uwinnipeg.ca
>>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 20:10:12 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Wab Kinew
>>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>
>>> I will be out of the office until Thursday, Nov. 12th. I will
>>> respond to emails upon my return. Miigwech and all the best.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos
>>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:45:29 -0400
>>> Subject: Fwd: Attn Wab Kinew
>>> To: mia.rabson@freepress.mb.ca, Paul.Samyn@freepress.mb.ca,
>>> "carolyn.bennett" carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca, Doug@dougeyolfson.ca,
>>> doug.eyolfson@parl.gc.ca
>>> Cc: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/peacemaker-363019331.html
>>>
>>> Peacemaker
>>> Group pushes for Truth and Reconciliation chairman to get Nobel Prize
>>>
>>> By: Mia Rabson
>>> Posted: 12/19/2015 3:00 AM | Last Modified: 12/19/2015 6:12 AM
>>>
>>> " Murray Sinclair already has an impressive resumé.
>>>
>>> He's the first aboriginal judge appointed to the bench in Manitoba,
>>> co-commissioner of the Aboriginal Justice Inquiry and chairman of the
>>> Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
>>>
>>> But if a group of Canadians has its way, he will get one of the
>>> highest honours in the world to add to the list: Nobel Peace Prize
>>> recipient.
>>>
>>> "He and Phil Fontaine should share a Nobel Peace Prize," said Wab
>>> Kinew, associate vice-president for indigenous relations at the
>>> University of Winnipeg.
>>>
>>> Kinew said a group of people in Winnipeg, Toronto and Ottawa are
>>> collaborating to nominate the two men, who they believe are jointly
>>> responsible for giving back hope to Canada's indigenous people that
>>> hasn't existed in a long time.
>>>
>>> "They made it into something that is peace-building and
>>> nation-building," Kinew said. "It has really transformed our country."
>>>
>>> Mia Rabson, Ottawa Bureau Chief
>>> 613-369–4824
>>>
>>> Paul
>>> Samyn, Editor
>>> 204–697–7295
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:05:01 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Wab Kinew
>>> To: w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca, "Paul.Lynch"
>>> Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca, "Marianne.Ryan"
>>> Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> Cc: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2015/12/21/why-do-canadians-need
>>> -to-know-anything-about-injuns/
>>>
>>> http://www.uwinnipeg.ca/about/administration/avp-igca.htmlAssociate
>>> Vice-President, Indigenous Affairs
>>>
>>> Wab Kinew
>>> phone: 204.789.9931
>>> email: w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca
>>> Biography/Publications
>>>
>>> Executive Assistant
>>>
>>> Sarra Deane
>>> phone: 204.988.7121
>>> email: s.deane@uwinnipeg.ca
>>>
>>
>
> --- Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are
> confidential and subject to copyright. They are intended only for the use of
> the intended recipient(s) and may be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission,
> conversion to hard copy, copying, circulation or other use of this message
> and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete
> this message and any attachments from your system.
>
> --- Avis de confidentialité : Ce message et toute pièce jointe sont
> confidentiels et assujettis au droit d’auteur. Il est de l’usage exclusif du
> ou des destinataire(s) visé(s) et peuvent être confidentiels. Si vous n’êtes
> pas le(s) destinataire(s) visé(s), nous attirons votre attention sur le fait
> qu’il est strictement interdit d’utiliser cette information, de la
> transmettre, de l’imprimer sur papier, de la copier, de la distribuer ou de
> la diffuser. Si vous n’êtes pas le destinataire visé, veuillez en aviser
> immédiatement l’expéditeur par courriel électronique et détruire ce message
> et toute copie de celui-ci.
>
> --------------------------------
> This email is a service from Liberal / Assistance.
>
>
> [J6PE8E-0WQN]
https://www.canada.ca/en/department-justice/news/2016/10/government-canada-announces-judicial-appointments-reforms-appointments-process-increase-openness-transparency.html
Government of Canada announces judicial appointments
and reforms the appointments process to increase openness and transparency
October 20, 2016 – Ottawa, ON –
Department of Justice Canada
The Minister of Justice and Attorney
General of Canada, the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, today announced 24
judicial appointments – as well as new measures to strengthen the role of
Judicial Advisory Committees in the judicial appointment process. These
measures will increase the openness, transparency, accountability, and
diversity of Canada’s judiciary.
While the Judicial Advisory
Committees (JACs) will remain at the heart of the appointment process, changes
will be made – effective immediately – to reform the process. These changes
include:
- reconstituted committees that better reflect the diversity of our great country
- revised committee mandates to increase the independence of their processes; and
- an open selection process for the three members of each committee who represent the general public – a measure which aims to ensure that Canadians are properly represented in the appointment process.
Moving forward, all judicial
appointments made by the Government of Canada, excluding Supreme Court of
Canada appointments, will be completed under the reformed appointments process.
With today’s announcement, Canada
continues to demonstrate its commitment to a robust, highly-qualified, diverse,
and independent judiciary.
Quote
“We have moved to fill urgent
judicial vacancies by drawing on existing lists of recommended candidates. The
government is confident in the outstanding quality of these appointees and
their dedication to delivering just outcomes for Canadians.”
“We know that the quality of
Canada’s judiciary is second to none. The measures we are introducing today
will make the judicial appointments process more open, transparent and
accountable for future appointments, resulting in a judiciary that is more
reflective of Canada’s diversity.”
The Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
Quick Facts
- There are 17 Judicial Advisory Committees, with each province and territory represented.
- The Office of the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs administers the Judicial Advisory Committees. The Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs, established in 1978, reports directly to the Minister of Justice and provides administrative support to Judicial Advisory Committees. Its role is to safeguard the independence of the judiciary and assess the qualification of lawyers applying for federal judicial appointments.
- Federal judicial appointments are made by the Governor General, acting on the advice of the federal Cabinet and recommendations from the Minister of Justice.
- This process is separate from the Supreme Court of Canada judicial appointments process announced on August 2, 2016. Nominees to the Supreme Court of Canada are selected by the Prime Minister from a thoroughly-vetted list of candidates.
- The new processes for judicial appointments and the JACs will replace the changes introduced in 2006.
Related Products
- Frequently Asked Questions: Changes to the Superior Courts Judicial Appointments Process
- Reforms to the Superior Courts Judicial Appointments Process
- New process to select representatives of the general public on Judicial Advisory Committees
- Tax Court of Canada Judicial Appointments
- Alberta Judicial Appointments
- British Columbia Judicial Appointments
- Manitoba Judicial Appointments
- Nova Scotia Judicial Appointments
- Ontario Judicial Appointments
- Quebec Judicial Appointments
Associated Links
- Application process for representatives of the general public on Judicial Advisory Committees
- Judicial Advisory Committees
- Canada's Court System
- Office of the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs
- Constitution Acts, 1867 to 1982
- Judges Act
Contacts
Valérie Gervais
Office of the Minister of Justice
613-992-4621
Office of the Minister of Justice
613-992-4621
Media Relations
Department of Justice
613-957-4207
Department of Justice
613-957-4207
Follow Department of Justice Canada
on Twitter (@JusticeCanadaEn), join us on Facebook
or visit our YouTube channel.
The Government of Canada announces judicial
appointment to the Tax Court of Canada
October 20, 2016 – Ottawa, Ontario –
Department of Justice Canada
The Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould,
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, today announced the
following appointment:
Bruce Russell, Q.C., a partner with McInnes Cooper in Halifax, is appointed a
judge of the Tax Court of Canada to replace Mr. Justice C.J. Miller, who
elected supernumerary status effective February 17, 2016.
This appointment is effective
immediately.
Tax
Court of Canada
Bruce
Russell, Q.C.
Education
- Juris Doctor, University of Toronto (1979)
Professional
Experience
2001 – Present
Partner with McInnes Cooper in Halifax
1999 - 2001
Associate with McInnes Cooper
1982 - 1999
Counsel with the Department of Justice Canada
1979 – 1982
Associate with Burchell MacDougall & Gruchy in Truro
1979
Admitted to the Bar of Nova Scotia
1984
Admitted to the Bar of Ontario
http://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/minister-of-justice-announces-appointments-to-the-judicial-advisory-committee-for-the-tax-court-of-canada-653645213.html
Minister of Justice announces appointments to the
Judicial Advisory Committee for the Tax Court of Canada
Oct 27, 2017, 13:07 ET
OTTAWA, Oct. 27, 2017 /CNW/ - The
Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada,
remains committed to appointing judges of the highest calibre who are
representative of the diversity of Canadian society. That commitment is
demonstrated by the Minister's new Judicial Advisory Committee process for
assessing applicants to the federal judiciary.
Today, Minister Wilson-Raybould is
proud to announce appointments to the Judicial Advisory Committee (JAC) for the
Tax Court of Canada. The JAC is composed of five members from across Canada
with expertise in taxation.
The committee announced today adds
to the existing complement of JACs. Fifteen JACs were previously
reconstituted under our Government's new, merit-based assessment process. These
JACs have started to provide the Minister of Justice with lists of highly
recommended and recommended candidates. Key changes to the assessment process
included:
- committees that fully reflect the diversity of Canadian society;
- revised committee mandates to increase the independence of their work;
- an open selection process for the public representatives on each committee – a measure which aims to ensure that all Canadians are properly represented in the appointment process; and
- online training on diversity and unconscious bias for all JAC members.
JACs are independent bodies mandated
to provide non-binding, merit-based recommendations to the Minister of Justice
on federal judicial appointments. All individuals seeking appointment to the
bench must apply under the new judicial appointment process
introduced in October 2016.
Quote
"I am grateful to these five
Canadians for volunteering their time and energies to the Judicial Advisory
Committee for the Tax Court of Canada. The newly announced committee includes
tax practitioners, renowned academics, and a justice of the Tax Court of Canada.
Members of the Committee are tasked
with ensuring that only the most meritorious candidates are recommended for
appointment to the Tax Court of Canada. As such, their work will have a
tremendous impact for the Court, for litigants, and ultimately for the Canadian
taxpayer."
The Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, P.C., Q.C., M.P.
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
The Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, P.C., Q.C., M.P.
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
Quick Facts
- There are 17 Judicial Advisory Committees (JACs) across Canada, with each province and territory represented.
- The Judicial Advisory Committee for the Tax Court of Canada is unique. Unlike the other 16 JACs across Canada, it is composed of five members with expertise in taxation. (The other 16 JACs have seven members each, with members representing the judiciary, the bar, and the general public.)
- Committee members are appointed by the federal government by Order in Council for a two-year term.
- For the first time, JAC members representing the general public were selected through an open application process. The selection criteria included commitment to public service, knowledge of the judicial system and/or public decision-making processes, subject matter expertise, geographic representation, language abilities, gender and diversity.
- The JACs have been given a revised mandate, which will serve to strengthen their independence. All members receive online training on unconscious bias and online training on the importance of diversity in the judiciary by the Chief Justice of Canada, the Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin, P.C.
- The Office of the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs, established in 1978, provides administrative support to the Judicial Advisory Committees. The role of the Commissioner's Office is to safeguard the independence of the judiciary and assess the qualification of lawyers and provincial court judges applying for federal judicial appointment.
- Federal judicial appointments are made by the Governor in Council, acting on the recommendations of the Minister of Justice.
https://www.canada.ca/en/department-justice/news/2017/10/judicial_advisorycommitteetaxcourtofcanada.html
Judicial Advisory Committee: Tax Court of Canada
Biographies
The Honourable Randall S. Bocock was
appointed to the Tax Court of Canada on September 29, 2011. Justice Bocock was
educated at McMaster University (B.A. 1982) and the University of Ottawa (LL.B.
1985). He was called to the Ontario Bar in 1987 and practised law as a student,
associate, and partner with Evans Philp LLP in Hamilton for over 25 years.
Before his appointment to the judiciary, he was head of the firm’s Business and
Property Law Group, chair of the firm’s management committee, and secretary to
the partnership.
Justice Bocock has served as chair
of the Federation of Ontario Law Associations (formerly CDLPA), president of
the Hamilton Law Association, former lifelong member of the Canadian
Association of University Solicitors, executive member of the National
Conference of Bar Presidents, and Law Society-nominated director of the
Lawyers’ Professional Indemnity Company (LawPRO). Within the community, Justice
Bocock was a director of the McMaster University Foundation, president of the
McMaster Alumni Association, and actively involved as a founding director and
secretary of the Hamilton Shelter Health Network.
Since his appointment, Justice
Bocock has chaired the Tax Court’s judicial education committee and served on
the permanent program committee of the International Association of Tax Judges.
Michel H.
Bourque
Partner KPMG Law
LLP
3100-205 5 Ave. S.W.
Calgary, Alberta T2P 4B9
Phone: (403) 691-8429
Email: mbourque@kpmg.ca
Michel Bourque holds an
undergraduate degree in finance (1993) and an LL.B. (1996), both from the
Université de Moncton. He also received an LL.M. in taxation from Osgoode Hall
Law School (2009). Following law school, he clerked for the Chief Justice of
New Brunswick and then clerked for Justice Gerald J. Rip, who later would
become the Chief Justice of the Tax Court of Canada. As counsel, Mr. Bourque
has focused on tax litigation since 1998. He currently practises at KPMG Law
LLP in Calgary.
Mr. Bourque is particularly
committed to volunteer work in support of Calgary’s gay and lesbian
communities. From 2007 to2010, he served on the board of the AIDS Calgary
Awareness Association (now called HIV Community Link), an organization focused
on health promotion and services for individuals and communities affected by
HIV/AIDS. Since 2011, Mr. Bourque has been an advisor to the Calgary Chinook
Fund, an endowment fund of the Calgary Foundation established to provide
ongoing long-term funding of LGBTQ2 charities in Calgary. Mr. Bourque was
recently elected Vice-Chair of the Board of the Calgary Sexual Health Centre,
an organization that aims to normalize sexual health in Alberta by providing
evidence-informed, non-judgemental sexual and reproductive health programs and
services. Finally, Mr. Bourque serves as Vice-President of the Mount Royal
Community Association, in Mount Royal where he lives with his spouse and their
two dogs.
Kim Brooks
Professor of Law
Room 323, Weldon Law Building,
6061 University Ave
PO Box 15000
PO Box 15000
Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2
Phone: 902-494-7112
Phone: 902-494-7112
Email: kim.brooks@dal.ca
Kim Brooks is a professor and former
dean (2010-2015) of the Schulich School of Law at Dalhousie University. She
holds a B.A. from the University of Toronto, an LL.B. from the University of
British Columbia, and an LL.M. in taxation from Osgoode Hall Law School. Prof.
Brooks began her career practising tax law with Stikeman Elliott in Toronto and
London, before turning her focus to academia. She has taught taxation at
Queen’s University, the University of British Columbia, and McGill University.
Prof. Brooks received the 3M National Teaching Fellowship in 2010 in
recognition of her deep-seated commitment to innovative teaching and classroom
exchange. Her scholarship on tax law and policy has received six Social
Sciences and Humanities Research Council grants to date.
Outside of academia, Prof. Brooks
has contributed to a broad array of national organizations, particularly those
focused on taxation, public policy, and the promotion of substantive equality.
Prof. Brooks currently serves as Vice-Chair of the Canada Revenue Agency’s
Offshore Compliance Advisory Committee. She is a director of the Institute for
Research on Public Policy and a member of the Board of Governors of the
Canadian Tax Foundation. Previously, Prof. Brooks served on the advisory
committee for the Court Challenges Program (2000-2006). She is a former Chair
of the Board of Women’s LEAF (Legal Education and Action Fund).
Vern Krishna | Of Counsel
TaxChambers LLP
155 University Avenue, Suite 300
Toronto, ON. M5H 3B7
Phone: 416-847-7300
Email: vern.krishna@taxchambers.ca
Vern Krishna has been a professor of
taxation, business law, and corporate finance at the University of Ottawa since
1981. His scholarship has been cited in hundreds of Canadian cases, including
31 decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada. Prof. Krishna, who has taught and
practised tax law for 50 years, is also tax counsel with Tax Chambers LLP in
Toronto. He received an undergraduate degree in economics from the University
of Manchester, before going on to receive an LL.B. and M.B.A. from the
University of Alberta and an LL.M. from Harvard University.
Prof. Krishna twice served as a
commissioner of the Ontario Securities Commission (1994-1997 and 2010-2014). He
is a former president of the Certified General Accountants Association of
Ontario (1995) and former treasurer of the Law Society of Upper Canada
(2001-2003). In recognition of his accomplishments, Prof. Krishna was elected a
Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada in 1992 and became a member of the Order
of Canada in 2004. He received an honorary doctorate from the Law Society of
Upper Canada in 2004.
Nathalie
Goyette Partner
PwC LLP
1255 René-Lévesque Blvd. W., Suite
2500
Montréal, Québec H3B 4Y1
Phone: (514) 205-5321
Email: nathalie.goyette@ca.pwc.com
Nathalie Goyette received her LL.L.
from the University of Ottawa (1988) and her LL.B. from Dalhousie University (1989),
in addition to an LL.M. in taxation from the Université de Sherbrooke (1998).
Admitted to the Quebec Bar in 1990, she has significant experience in tax
litigation on both the government and taxpayer sides. Fluently bilingual, she
spent the first 16 years of her career with the federal Department of Justice.
Since 2011, she has been a tax litigation partner with PwC Law in Montreal.
Ms. Goyette has been a member of Tax
Court of Canada Rules Committee since 2007. She previously served as a Governor
of the Canadian Tax Foundation from 2012-2014, in addition to publishing and
presenting widely on topics related to taxation. Outside of her professional
work, Ms. Goyette has served on a fundraising committee for the Foundation of
the Montreal Museum of Contemporary Art since 2010.
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/the-canadian-institute-of-chartered.html
Tuesday, 28 November 2017
Methinks The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants and their many associates must remember me now correct Kevin Dancey?
---------- Original message ----------
From: newsroom@globeandmail.com
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 02:35:08 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks that the Canadian Tax Foundation, The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants and their many associates must remember me now N'esy Pas EzzyLevant?
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical support, please contact our Customer Service department at 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to publiceditor@globeandmail.com
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and press releases.
Hello,
ReplyDeleteI'm Dr Ogudugu, a real and genuine spell caster/Spiritual healer with years of experience in spell casting and an expert in all spells, i specialize exclusively in LOVE SPELL/GET REUNITE WITH EX LOVER, MONEY SPELL, POWERFUL MAGIC RING, ANY COURT CASES, FRUIT OF THE WOMB, HIV CURE, CURE FOR CANCER, HERPES, DIABETE, HERPERTITIS B, PARKINSON’S HERBAL CURE, BECOMING A MERMAID, BECOMING A VAMPIRE, SAVE CHILD BIRTH. They are all %100 Guaranteed QUICK Results, it most work. If you have any problem and you need a real and genuine spell caster to solve your problems, contact me now through my personal Email Address with problem case...Note-you can also Text/Call on WhatsApp.
Contact me -
Email: greatogudugu@gmail.com
WhatsApp No: +27663492930