From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 16:28:21 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE Whatever silly tricks the CBC and their
cohorts wish to pull on me these days ain't gonna stop me from suing
the Queen again and Sophia Harris has known why since 2002
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 16:28:19 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE Whatever silly tricks the CBC and their
cohorts wish to pull on me these days ain't gonna stop me from suing
the Queen again and Sophia Harris has known why since 2002
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 16:28:27 +0000
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email to Premier McNeil.
This is an automatic confirmation your email has been received.
Warmest Regards,
Premier's Correspondence Team
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 12:28:13 -0400
Subject: RE Whatever silly tricks the CBC and their cohorts wish to
pull on me these days ain't gonna stop me from suing the Queen again
and Sophia Harris has known why since 2002
To: Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca, sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca
darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca, cps@calgarypolice.ca, grcanning@gmail.com,
Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, premier@ontario.ca,
Newsroom@globeandmail.com, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Barbara.Whitenect@gnb.ca,
eps@edmontonpolice.ca, ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca, PREMIER@gov.ns.ca,
premier@gov.ab.ca, Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca,
philip.bryden@gov.ab.ca, serge.rousselle@gnb.ca, denis.landry2@gnb.ca,
carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, jack.keir@gnb.ca,
Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca,
hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, kathleen.roussel@ppsc-sppc.gc.
Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
Methinks everybody knows I had sent Sophia Harris and the US Ambassador piles of documents byway of a Courier (signature required) in July of 2002 N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/11/the-canadian-civil-liberties.html
https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/walmart-receipt-check-costco-1.5355527
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
Methinks the lawyer Michael Bryant should answered me in 2005 Everybody knows that I sent him Hard Copy of my concerns byway of registered US Mail (signature required) when he was the Attorney General of Ontario N'esy Pas?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/walmart-receipt-check-costco-1.5355527
'Treated as a criminal': Walmart receipt and bag checks anger customers. Your rights explained
Customers don't have to comply with routine receipt checks, civil rights expert says
· CBC News · Posted: Nov 12, 2019 4:00 AM ET
Penny Rintoul of Vaughan, Ont., said she finds Walmart receipt checks 'angering and demeaning.' (Jacqueline Hansen/CBC)
An apparent step-up of receipt and shopping bag checks at Walmart has sparked customer complaints, raising concerns about shoppers' rights.
"It was not a request, it was a demand," said Penny Rintoul of Vaughan, Ont., about a recent receipt check just before she exited Walmart with her purchases. She said her local Walmart increased its checks in the spring.
"It's very angering and demeaning."
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) said it's investigating the practice of retailers doing routine security checks at the exit, concerned that the way they're conducted may jeopardize customers' rights.
Michael Bryant, CCLA's executive director and general counsel, said retailers should get consent before checking receipts or bags. And if no consent is provided, he said, customers are under no obligation to comply.
"Their right is to say, 'Thanks, but no thanks,' and walk away," said Bryant.
"Some people feel strongly about their privacy and, in fact, the way our laws work, that privacy and liberty is protected."
Michael Bryant, executive director and general counsel for the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, says retailers should get consent before checking receipts or bags. (Jacqueline Hansen/CBC)
In a 2016 ruling on a case involving a suspected shoplifter, an Ontario Superior Court judge wrote that a retailer can detain a suspect if there are reasonable grounds, but — even then — it would have to get consent to do a search.
Walmart didn't directly address questions from CBC News about customers' rights including what happens if shoppers refuse receipt checks. The retail giant also didn't say if it has stepped up its security checks.
"To assist in our efforts to manage costs and offer everyday low prices, customers may be asked to show their receipts as they exit our store to ensure the checkout process went smoothly," said Walmart Canada spokesperson Adam Grachnik in an email.
CBC News interviewed several customers who said they weren't "asked," and instead felt pressured to comply.
Walmart said customers may be asked to show their receipts as they exit to ensure the checkout process 'went smoothly.' (Sophia Harris/CBC)
Paula Fletcher of Renfrew County, Ont., said that in August, a Walmart employee watched as she scanned her groceries at self-checkout, and then insisted on inspecting her receipt and shopping bag.
"She did not make it an option," said Fletcher.
"I don't like being treated as a criminal," she said. "If they don't trust us, they shouldn't have self-checkout."
Walmart's recent addition of self-checkout machines appears to be a driving force behind receipt checks. In response to customer complaints on social media, the retailer has replied repeatedly that it's doing the checks to ensure the self-checkout process "went smoothly" and that all items have been scanned.
Studies suggest that stores adding self-checkouts can experience more theft because thieves believe the risk of getting caught not scanning items is low.
@WalmartCanada Since you’ve installed self service check out In your stores I feel like a criminal every time I leave your stores and the greeter has to check me receipt to make sure I’m not shop lifting
Hey @WalmartCanada when did you turn into Costco? Private security guard at Richmond Hill Bayview-Major Mac store is stopping everyone and checking their receipt and items purchased. Shouldn’t have to line up to leave a Walmart!
Hi. Our associates are trained to check receipts to make sure unbagged items, and those at the bottom of the basket, have been scanned. As more of our stores are equipped with self-checkout machines, our associates will check receipts to make sure the transaction went smoothly.
Amy Fraser of Sydney Mines, N.S., said she has experienced frequent receipt and occasional shopping bag inspections in the past five months at Walmart, both after using self-checkout and checking out with a cashier.
She said she reached her limit last month when a Walmart employee demanded to check her receipt, just as she prepared to feed her baby before exiting.
"He's like pouncing, 'You have your receipt?'" said Fraser. "I just [felt] like walking out and being like, 'No, no, call the cops on me.'"
Walmart has replied repeatedly to customers on social media that it’s doing the checks to ensure that all items have been scanned. (Sophia Harris/CBC)
So what happens if a retailer calls the cops? Toronto security consultant James Reese said a retailer needs to have evidence of theft for police to take action.
"If they did not see you take something, they cannot come after you just for refusing to show your bags or receipt," he said.
In the 2016 case involving the suspected shoplifter, the judge also wrote that "if a store owner is mistaken and no theft has occurred, their detention of a customer makes them liable for … false imprisonment."
However, shoppers rejecting receipt checks do risk being banned from the store, said Reese.
"That's within the merchant's prerogative."
What about Costco?
Retail giant Costco also checks customers' receipts.
However, Costco customers are required to sign up for a membership, which means they may have provided consent — depending on how clearly the rules are laid out, said CCLA's Bryant.
"They need to tell people about it."
Costco didn't reply to requests for comment, but CBC News found its policy on its website in the "membership conditions" section. It says customers are required to show receipts to ensure that "you have been properly charged for your purchases" and to maintain accurate inventory control.
CBC News discovered signs at several Toronto-area Walmarts which stated, 'Please have Receipt ready for Proof of Purchase.' But 'Just because there's a sign doesn't mean that someone's read it or understood it,' says Toronto criminal lawyer Anthony Moustacalis. (Laura MacNaughton/CBC)
At Walmart, there's no membership requirement and customers interviewed said they saw no in-store warnings that they'd be checked.
Last week, CBC News did discover signs at several Toronto-area Walmarts which stated, "Please have Receipt ready for Proof of Purchase." But a Toronto criminal lawyer argues that's not good enough.
"Just because there's a sign doesn't mean that someone's read it or understood it," said Anthony Moustacalis.
"Consent does need to be fully informed," he said. "That generally means that you need to know that you have a right to refuse."
There's no question that shoplifting is a problem for retailers, especially when it comes to self-checkout. But retailers still need to play by the rules, even when tackling emerging technologies, said Bryant.
"New technology should never mean giving up your rights."
About the Author
3143 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
David Amos
Methinks the lawyer Michael Bryant should answered me in 2005 Everybody knows that I sent him Hard Copy of my concerns byway of registered US Mail (signature required) when he was the Attorney General of Ontario N'esy Pas?
Mellor Byfield
Reply to @David Amos: Well there's your first problem... US mail doesn't operate in Canada.
David Amos
Reply to @mellor
byfield: Not true I have the tracked receipts and I published them as
soon as got them in other people's' blogs Methinks you should Google
Charles Leblanc Gold found in Sussex in order to see what I say is true
then ask your MP about my concerns ASAP N'esy Pas?
Mellor Byfield
Reply to @David Amos: I've got better things to do.. and so does my MP.
David Amos
Reply to @mellor
byfield: Furthermore Doug Ford definitely got a copy of my lawsuit
Federal Court File No T-1557-15 Trust that I made the lawyer Michael
Bryant and his many associates well aware of that fact as well.
David Amos
Reply to @mellor byfield: Yea Right
Paul Ethier
And over at the government run LCBO, they hold the door open for you so that you can walk out with duffle bags full of unpaid booze.
Al Clark
Reply to @Paul Ethier: I think you're talking about a recent story from Winnipeg, a long LONG way from any LCBO.
Paul Ethier
Reply to @Al Clark: No, LCBO also.
Robert Summer
Reply to @Paul
Ethier: suprise suprise a goverment run facility knows and respects the
law and the fact that their security agents are not police with the
power of dettaining a person. Funny how a company tries to upsurp the
polices power and you seem to support that
Al Clark
Reply to @Paul Ethier: LOL! What do you think the O in LCBO stands for??? HAHAHAHA!
David Amos
Reply to @Al Clark: Methinks more folks laugh at you and your cop buddies rather than with you N'esy Pas?
John Noble
When a store opens its doors to potential customers, under law known as “ an invitation to treat” , you are welcome to shop there under their rules . If it involves a security check at the end so be it . A company or business has every reasonable duty to protect its assets and employees . You do NOT have to shop there if you do not like the stores procedures
.
Al Clark
Reply to @John Noble: The "security check" is at the cashier. After that, what's in the bag is YOUR property!
John Noble
Reply to @Al Clark: uh no ! The security check is over when you leave the business private property
David Amos
Reply to @Al Clark:
Methinks it you did your own "security check" you and your cop buddies
would have discovered that I had sent Sophia Harris in Toronto and the
US Ambassador in Ottawa identical piles of documents byway of a Courier
(signature required) in July of 2002 N'esy Pas?
Mike Potter
Reply to @John Noble: If it involves a security check at the end so be it
"the judge also wrote that "if a store owner is mistaken and no theft has occurred, their detention of a customer makes them liable for … false imprisonment."
I'll take option "B".
"the judge also wrote that "if a store owner is mistaken and no theft has occurred, their detention of a customer makes them liable for … false imprisonment."
I'll take option "B".
Al Clark
Reply to @David Amos: What the.....?????
David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @Al Clark: Deja Vu for you and your cop buddies to enjoy
https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/integrity-yea-right
Reply to @Al Clark: Deja Vu for you and your cop buddies to enjoy
https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/integrity-yea-right
Al Clark
Reply to @David Amos: What happened to the raymond? Dodging a ban/blockage?
Al Clark
Reply to @David Amos: LOL "AKA Gandalf The Kray-zay"
David Amos
Reply to @Al Clark: Say hey to your buddy Patty Doran for me will ya?
David Amos
Reply to @Al Clark: I will leave it to you to explain to Maddy why I took the gloves off with you
David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @John Noble: Methinks the "Powers the Be" in Canada and the USA who monitor my bank account byway of the very questionable FATCA rules should already know that I published my comments to the strange Mr Clark and emailed them to certain people as well. I then went to a Walmart in Fat Fred City and spent about 800 loonies on a "Smart TV" and some groceries etc. When the woman at the door asked to see my receipt as I was leaving I mentioned this article and my comments. In response she said: So what? So I told her to sue me and walked out. When I returned to my abode I noticed one of my comments had gone "Poof" Go Figure why I Madame Harris, many Yankees and I were not surprised.
Al Clark
Reply to @David Amos: LOL "AKA Gandalf The Kray-zay"
David Amos
Reply to @Al Clark: Say hey to your buddy Patty Doran for me will ya?
David Amos
Reply to @Al Clark: I will leave it to you to explain to Maddy why I took the gloves off with you
David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @John Noble: Methinks the "Powers the Be" in Canada and the USA who monitor my bank account byway of the very questionable FATCA rules should already know that I published my comments to the strange Mr Clark and emailed them to certain people as well. I then went to a Walmart in Fat Fred City and spent about 800 loonies on a "Smart TV" and some groceries etc. When the woman at the door asked to see my receipt as I was leaving I mentioned this article and my comments. In response she said: So what? So I told her to sue me and walked out. When I returned to my abode I noticed one of my comments had gone "Poof" Go Figure why I Madame Harris, many Yankees and I were not surprised.
Jon Stone
If I was stopped on my way out of Walmark and they demanded i show a receipt, i would say "sure. Right over here at the service desk where I will return everything i just purchased." I absolutely refuse to use self checkouts as they are in fact a dis-service to customers and because of a decision made by Walmart to save pennies, customers are now being treated with suspicion. No thanks.
Bort Smith
Reply to @Piet Bloem:
I don't care about walmart getting it's property stolen. They make enough money.
Also, the price is not impacted by theives.
David Amos
Reply to @Jon Stone:
Methinks many people now know that after reading this article and making
a few comments I went to one old Wally's stores and spent about 800
loonies then told the lady at the door as I was leaving to sue me if
they wanted to check their own work N'esy Pas?
David Amos
Reply to @Bort Smith: "Also, the price is not impacted by theives."
Dream on
Dream on
Mark Praill
One more reason why I don't shop at Walmart.
Derek Golota
Reply to @Mark Praill: well, you get same treatment at Costco. What most shoppers don't realize that there is a massive amount of theft taking place at all Canadian stores, just any manager that works in retail. The issue is largely unreported and law enforcement is a joke due to existing laws.
Felicia McMahon
Reply to @Mark
Praill: I love Walmart because I feel rich when I'm shopping. They give
you Price Match! I bought something that was a sale price from La Baie
at Walmart!!!!!
David Mccaig
Reply to @Mark Praill:
Selfish people don't care that Walmart are poverty wage employers.
Selfish people don't care that Walmart are poverty wage employers.
David Mccaig
Reply to @Mark Praill:
Walmart blocks all and any attempt at employees unionizing. They've as far as to shut down stores.
Walmart blocks all and any attempt at employees unionizing. They've as far as to shut down stores.
David Mccaig
Reply to @Mark Praill:
A longtime police veteran in Tulsa, Oklahoma, stated, "It’s ridiculous—we are talking about the biggest retailer in the world. I may have half my squad there for hours." A police captain in Port Richey, Florida, stated, "They recognize the problem and refuse to do anything about it."
A longtime police veteran in Tulsa, Oklahoma, stated, "It’s ridiculous—we are talking about the biggest retailer in the world. I may have half my squad there for hours." A police captain in Port Richey, Florida, stated, "They recognize the problem and refuse to do anything about it."
David Mccaig
Reply to @Mark Praill:
With over 2.3 million employees worldwide, Walmart has faced a torrent of lawsuits and issues with regards to its workforce. These issues involve low wages, poor working conditions, inadequate health care, and issues involving the company's strong anti-union policies.
With over 2.3 million employees worldwide, Walmart has faced a torrent of lawsuits and issues with regards to its workforce. These issues involve low wages, poor working conditions, inadequate health care, and issues involving the company's strong anti-union policies.
Doug Gray
Reply to @david
mccaig: They reduce their cost by letting checkouts go and forcing
people to do the process themselves, then try to do an illegal search.
If I have a couple of items I do not mind doing it myself. All the big
box stores are trying to force it.
David Amos
Reply to @david mccaig: Methinks Walmart has never encountered the likes of me N'esy Pas?
David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @Derek
Golota: There are lots of laws on the books Methinks the cops are too
lazy or incompetent or corrupt to enforce them N'esy Pas?
Alexander Borgia
I do not like being treated like a criminal by stores, so I don't shop at the ones that treat me that way. With online shopping it is much easier to buy things with no human interaction. I can live without Costco and Walmart.
Doug Gray
Reply to @Louren
Organzo: Why should we pay our Police $100,000 a year plus benefits to
deal with petty theft from big box retailers when they build their
losses into our consumer prices?
David Amos
Reply to @Alexander
Borgia: Trust that living without Walmart is pretty hard to do for a
lot of Hillbillys such as I in the Maritimes. Trust that home delivery
can be rough at times if at all particularly during floods, hurricanes
and snowstorms etc Methinks is best just to take the four wheel drive
to town now and then stock up. Furthermore everybody around here knows
Walmart is the biggest game in town with one stop shopping and the best
prices N'esy Pas?
David Amos
Reply to @Doug Gray:
Methinks if the overpaid cops quit eating donuts and started acting
within the scope of their employment then petty theft would drop along
with the price of the goods we buy and the taxes we pay to buy them
donuts N'esy Pas?
Doug Monkman
So according to walmart you are guilty until proven innocent?
Doug Gray
Reply to @Fredderek
Baccio: That would not stand up in any court. How can anyone consent to
routine search in advance in a free society. As an employee you better
ensure your employer will hire your lawyer if you force a search.
David Amos
Reply to @Doug Monkman: Apparently so
David Amos
Reply to @Doug Gray: I agree
Tommy Haggen
Why are there so many crying babies? If you don't want that, go to No Frills.
David Amos
Reply to @Tommy Haggen: Never heard of them
Freeman Jones
I do Walmart's job enough times when I checkout my own goods. When I don't use self serve, I wait in ridiculous line ups for the one or two manned checkouts. One thing I've never done, and never will is wait in a line up to prove that I own the possessions that I'm leaving with. If you suspect me of stealing, you'd best be giving law enforcement a call to follow up on your suspicion. They'll track me down somewhere driving away from your establishment.
George Tam
Reply to @Freeman
Jones: Agreed. It's troubling how many people don't understand basic
law. It's really an extension of common sense.
David Amos
Reply to @Freeman Jones: I won't use their self serve Hence they should not accuse me of anything.
David Amos
Reply to @George Tam: Oh So True
James Quin
If people would when asked to show receipt take their purchase to customer service and have it refunded as they check receipt it might just send a message. Just stop shopping at Walmart would be the best way to deal with it.
David Amos
Reply to @James Quin:
I have been tempted to do that several times but Walmart is the best
spot to shop locally and I needed what I just bought. Since this
article came out I will always refuse their demand to see my receipt and
look forward to arguing with a cop who thinks I am a thief.
Jackie Forty Forty Two
Fascinating stuff: On the one hand, I have accepted that Costco checks my receipt with little concern. This is largely because checkout is relatively quick and the staff is efficient and friendly. On the other hand, some other retailers have eliminated 'express checkout' for the purchase of a handful of items and push customers to self-check which often, compared to Costco, is far slower.
David Amos
Reply to @Jackie
Forty Forty Two: It seems very strange to me that one has to pay a store
in order to shop there. Leave it to Yankees to dream up such nonsense
Jackie Forty Forty Two
Reply to @David Amos: Indeed - I have tried to reconcile that in my head many times (I have also been on and off with membership). My understanding of the model is that membership fees are a substantial portion of Costco's profit; however, I cannot cite a reference as proof. Nonetheless, their customer service is pretty solid and as long as one often requires a jumbo portion of something, the value is often worth the fee.
Clarence Hemeon
What about the stores right to reduce loss by people stealing items. I guess that doesn't count.
Bort Smith
Reply to @Clarence Hemeon:
Who cares about the problems facing corporations?
Who cares about the problems facing corporations?
David Amos
Reply to @Bort Smith:
Methinks we all should because no doubt we are stakeholders in these
publicly held companies byway of our pension plans N'esy Pas?
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 17:25:42 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Whatever this sicko sent me about Patrick
Doran I did not download to check out However rest assured that I will
sue the cops about it and the CBC certainly know why
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Office of the Mayor <TheMayor@calgary.ca>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 17:25:42 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: [EXT] Whatever this sicko sent me about
Patrick Doran I did not download to check out However rest assured
that I will sue the cops about it and the CBC certainly know why
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for reaching out! Your message is important to me.
My staff read and review every incoming email. We receive a high
volume of correspondence and do our best to reply to each inquiry with
the information and services that are required.
The following resources may be helpful to address your email before we
are able to respond:
· Please call 311 if you require immediate assistance. A City
of Calgary customer service representative from 311 will be available
to help you right away.
· If there’s an Event that you would like me to attend, please
complete the “Invite the Mayor” form on my website or click here:
Invite the Mayor<https://www.calgary.ca/
· If you would like to request a Meeting, a Program Letter, a
Birthday or Anniversary Message or a Proclamation or Letter of
Recognition please complete the appropriate form under “Requests” on
my website: Calgarymayor.ca<https://www.
If you would like a Mayor's Special Certificate of Recognition, email
The Mayor
The City of Calgary and my office are committed to supporting a safe,
respectful and inclusive work environment. Correspondence containing
profanity or abuse of any kind will not be responded to.
Thank you again for contacting my office and please stay in touch with
me through Twitter<https://twitter.com/
Facebook<https://www.facebook.
Instagram<https://www.
Sincerely,
Mayor Naheed K. Nenshi
Calgary Municipal Building
800 Macleod Trail SE
P.O. Box 2100, Station M, #8069
Calgary, AB, Canada T2P 2M5
Calgarymayor.ca<https://www.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 17:25:44 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Whatever this sicko sent me about Patrick
Doran I did not download to check out However rest assured that I will
sue the cops about it and the CBC certainly know why
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:25:36 -0400
Subject: Whatever this sicko sent me about Patrick Doran I did not
download to check out However rest assured that I will sue the cops
about it and the CBC certainly know why
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca
Cc: cps@calgarypolice.ca, grcanning@gmail.com,
Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, premier@ontario.ca,
Newsroom@globeandmail.com, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Barbara.Whitenect@gnb.ca,
eps@edmontonpolice.ca, ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca, PREMIER@gov.ns.ca,
premier@gov.ab.ca, Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca,
philip.bryden@gov.ab.ca, serge.rousselle@gnb.ca, denis.landry2@gnb.ca,
carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, jack.keir@gnb.ca,
Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca,
hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, kathleen.roussel@ppsc-sppc.gc.
Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
---------- Original message ----------
From: i675fi+lxr1n272ondk@
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 03:21:55 +0000
Subject: Patty Baby Doran
To: "Motomaniac333@gmail.com" <Motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Patty sent this video to my 13yo daughter.
----
Sent using Guerrillamail.com
Block or report abuse:
https://www.guerrillamail.com/
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
1837 Comments
John Noble
When a store opens its doors to potential customers, under law known
as “ an invitation to treat” , you are welcome to shop there under
their rules . If it involves a security check at the end so be it . A
company or business has every reasonable duty to protect its assets
and employees . You do NOT have to shop there if you do not like the
stores procedures
.
Al Clark
Reply to @John Noble: The "security check" is at the cashier. After
that, what's in the bag is YOUR property!
John Noble
Reply to @Al Clark: uh no ! The security check is over when you leave
the business private property
David Amos
Reply to @Al Clark: Methinks it you did your own "security check" you
and your cop buddies would have discovered that I had sent Sophia
Harris in Toronto and the US Ambassador in Ottawa identical piles of
documents byway of a Courier (signature required) in July of 2002
N'esy Pas?
Mike Potter
Reply to @John Noble: If it involves a security check at the end so be it
"the judge also wrote that "if a store owner is mistaken and no theft
has occurred, their detention of a customer makes them liable for …
false imprisonment."
I'll take option "B".
Al Clark
Reply to @David Amos: What the.....?????
David Amos
Reply to @Al Clark: Deja Vu for you and your cop buddies to enjoy
https://www.scribd.com/doc/
Al Clark
Reply to @David Amos: What happened to the raymond? Dodging a ban/blockage?
Al Clark
Reply to @David Amos: LOL "AKA Gandalf The Kray-zay"
On 10/27/19, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> It would not be wise for me to forward a video of Partick Doran
> masturbating just as my fors hope that tI do. Trust that I will save
> it and add to to all the other evidence of cyberbulling and death
> threats etc to use against te RCMP in Federal Court.
>
> Kriss Well and Glen Canning had lots to say about Barry Winters when
> he was finally arrested after I met met 3 Judgges in in the Federal
> Court of Appeal and pointed to the words of Barry Winters about Justin
> Trudeau However the activists should have also read what I said about
> them in the same lawsuit. (Jan Jensen and his very corrupt bosses can
> scroll down to review EH Ralph Goodale?)
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>
> Physical, sexual violence common in Atlantic schools, national survey shows
>
> A lack of national data on violence and bullying prompted CBC News to
> ask young people about their experiences
> Karissa Donkin · CBC News · Posted: Oct 24, 2019 5:00 AM AT
>
> "Glen Canning was disappointed to see how many young people in
> Atlantic Canada report having experienced sexual violence while
> attending school. (Yanjun Li/CBC)"
>
> Obviously there are no coincidences
> On the same day I hear Glen Canning yapping on CBC I get an email from
> one of his supporters trying to get something going again after the
> obvious malice of Patrick Doran had been deleted from YouTube and
> apparently from Encyclopedia Dramatica as well?
>
> I tweeted this today right after I called the corrupt cops in Calgary
> again CORREcT?
>
> https://twitter.com/
>
> David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
> Replying to @CalgaryPolice
> I just called about a perverted video of your client the cyberbully
> Patrick Doran https://gab.com/MadShangi that I got in an email from
> anonymous fans of @GlenfordCanning who often pretend to be me Trust
> that @RCMPNB & @NS_Justice
> know everything
>
> #cdnpoli
>
> https://youtube.com/watch?v=
>
> The worst case of doxxing I've ever seen - Esau and Thomas with Madshangi
> Streamed live on Mar 26, 2018
>
> Orbiting Esau
>
>
> The Mad Shangi (@MadShangi@gab.com) | gab.com
> 464 Gabs, 113 Following, 160 Followers ·
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> Misandry Today Supports Doxing With @MisandryToday
> Mar 15, 2018
> Cognitive Thought
> Misandry Today is supporting the initial doxer of Mad Shangi by
> continuing to spread Mad Shangi's dox which Mad Shangi didn't dox.
> This includes has last home address, phone numbers and ex employers.
>
>
> https://twitter.com/
>
>
> David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
> Feb 19, 2018
> Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Wikileaks_ and 48 others
> A reminder for Glen Canning, Legions of Corrupt Cops, their many
> perverted clients, Encyclopedia Dramatica and the Baconfat Legacy
> etc versus Section 300 of the Canadian Criminal Code
> http://davidraymondamos3.
> #cdnpoli #FBICorruption #CyberAware #RCMPNS
> https://youtube.com/watch?v=
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>
>
> Thursday, 25 January 2018
>
> The Baconfat Legacy
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Premier of Ontario | Première ministre de l’Ontario
> < Premier@ontario.ca>
> Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 03:02:26 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: The Baconfat Legacy
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thanks for your email. I value your input and appreciate your taking
> the time to get in touch with me.
>
> Every email and letter I receive is carefully read and reviewed. Given
> the volume of emails and letters I receive, and because I may need to
> share your message with one of my Cabinet ministers or the appropriate
> government officials for more information, a response may take several
> business days.
>
> Thanks again for contacting me.
>
> Kathleen Wynne
> Premier
>
>
> Please note that we are not able to receive replies at this email
> address, so please do not respond directly to this email.
>
> * * *
>
> Je vous remercie de votre courriel. Votre avis est important pour moi
> et je vous suis reconnaissante d’avoir pris le temps de m’écrire.
>
> Toutes les lettres et tous les courriels que je reçois sont lus
> attentivement, un par un. Sachez, cependant, qu’en raison du volume
> important de correspondance que je reçois et parce qu’il se peut que
> j’aie à consulter l’un de mes collègues du Conseil des ministres ou un
> fonctionnaire compétent en la matière, il pourrait s’écouler plusieurs
> jours avant que je puisse donner suite à votre courriel.
>
> Meilleures salutations,
>
> Kathleen Wynne
> Première ministre de l’Ontario
>
> Veuillez ne pas répondre directement à ce courriel, car aucun courriel
> ne peut être reçu à cette adresse.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 23:02:19 -0400
> Subject: The Baconfat Legacy
> To: "Paul.Lynch" <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
> "philip.bryden" <philip.bryden@gov.ab.ca>,
> patrick_doran1 <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, cps <cps@calgarypolice.ca>,
> eps <eps@edmontonpolice.ca>, "Kathleen.Ganley"
> < Kathleen.Ganley@assembly.ab.
> < ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>,
> premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Glen Canning <grcanning@gmail.com>, "bill.sweeney"
> < bill.sweeney@gov.ab.ca>,
> ethics-ethique <ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> "Liliana.Longo" <Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> "jan.jensen" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>,
> "Larry.Tremblay" <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "denis.landry2"
> < denis.landry2@gnb.ca>
>
> http://baconfatlegacy.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Minister of Public Safety / Ministre de la Sécurité publique
> (PS/SP)"
> < ps.ministerofpublicsafety-
> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:24:14 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: A reminder for Glen Canning, the Corrupt
> Cops and their clients Arthur Topham, Dana Durnford and Alex Hunter in
> BC, Dean Roger Ray, Eddy Atchem, Patty Baby Doran in Alberta,
> Encyclopedia Dramatica, the Baconfat Legacy etc and Section 3...
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Merci d’avoir écrit à l’honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la
> Sécurité publique et de la Protection civile.
> En raison d’une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
> adressée au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu’il pourrait y avoir un
> retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assuré que votre
> message sera examiné avec soin.
> *********
> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of
> Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
> addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay
> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
> carefully reviewed.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:24:26 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: A reminder for Glen Canning, the Corrupt
> Cops and their clients Arthur Topham, Dana Durnford and Alex Hunter in
> BC, Dean Roger Ray, Eddy Atchem, Patty Baby Doran in Alberta,
> Encyclopedia Dramatica, the Baconfat Legacy etc and Section 3...
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
> of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
>
> This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
> may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
> message will be carefully reviewed.
>
> To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
> the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
>
> Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
> Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the
> Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future
> correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write
> directly to the Department of Justice at
> mcu@justice.gc.camcu@justice.
>> or call 613-957-4222.
>
> Thank you
>
> -------------------
>
> Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
> Vancouver Granville.
>
> Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
> courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
> correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
> votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
>
> Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
> veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
> votre adresse et votre code postal.
>
> Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
> la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
> d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
> Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
> Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
> mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.
>
> Merci
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Premier of Ontario | Première ministre de l’Ontario
> < Premier@ontario.ca>
> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:24:07 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: A reminder for Glen Canning, the Corrupt
> Cops and their clients Arthur Topham, Dana Durnford and Alex Hunter in
> BC, Dean Roger Ray, Eddy Atchem, Patty Baby Doran in Alberta,
> Encyclopedia Dramatica, the Baconfat Legacy etc and Section 3...
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thanks for your email. I value your input and appreciate your taking
> the time to get in touch with me.
>
> Every email and letter I receive is carefully read and reviewed. Given
> the volume of emails and letters I receive, and because I may need to
> share your message with one of my Cabinet ministers or the appropriate
> government officials for more information, a response may take several
> business days.
>
> Thanks again for contacting me.
>
> Kathleen Wynne
> Premier
>
>
> Please note that we are not able to receive replies at this email
> address, so please do not respond directly to this email.
>
> * * *
>
> Je vous remercie de votre courriel. Votre avis est important pour moi
> et je vous suis reconnaissante d’avoir pris le temps de m’écrire.
>
> Toutes les lettres et tous les courriels que je reçois sont lus
> attentivement, un par un. Sachez, cependant, qu’en raison du volume
> important de correspondance que je reçois et parce qu’il se peut que
> j’aie à consulter l’un de mes collègues du Conseil des ministres ou un
> fonctionnaire compétent en la matière, il pourrait s’écouler plusieurs
> jours avant que je puisse donner suite à votre courriel.
>
> Meilleures salutations,
>
> Kathleen Wynne
> Première ministre de l’Ontario
>
> Veuillez ne pas répondre directement à ce courriel, car aucun courriel
> ne peut être reçu à cette adresse.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
> < fin.minfinance-financemin.
> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:24:13 +0000
> Subject: RE: A reminder for Glen Canning, the Corrupt Cops and their
> clients Arthur Topham, Dana Durnford and Alex Hunter in BC, Dean Roger
> Ray, Eddy Atchem, Patty Baby Doran in Alberta, Encyclopedia Dramatica,
> the Baconfat Legacy etc and Section 300 of the Can...
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
> comments.
>
> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
> commentaires.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 20:24:02 -0400
> Subject: A reminder for Glen Canning, the Corrupt Cops and their
> clients Arthur Topham, Dana Durnford and Alex Hunter in BC, Dean Roger
> Ray, Eddy Atchem, Patty Baby Doran
> in Alberta, Encyclopedia Dramatica, the Baconfat Legacy etc and
> Section 300 of the
> Canadian Crimial Code
> To: cps <cps@calgarypolice.ca>, themayor <themayor@calgary.ca>,
> "philip.bryden" <philip.bryden@gov.ab.ca>, "Bill.Morneau"
> < Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, "Kathleen.Ganley"
> < Kathleen.Ganley@assembly.ab.
> ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, eps
> < eps@edmontonpolice.ca>,
> "bill.clark" <bill.clark@edmontonpolice.ca>
> < Cindy.Bruneau@edmonton.ca>, "Paul.Lynch" <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
> editor <editor@frankmagazine.ca>, "Michelle.Boutin"
> < Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.
> ethics-ethique <ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> < eachtem@hotmail.com>,
> danadurnford <danadurnford@hotmail.com>, Dean Ray
> < deanrogerray@hotmail.com>, maryann4peace <maryann4peace@gmail.com>,
> xtofury <xtofury@gmail.com>,
> "don.iveson" <don.iveson@edmonton.ca>, "don.marshall"
> < don.marshall@edmonton.ca>,
> smcintyre <smcintyre@sylvanlake.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>,
> "david.eby.mla" <david.eby.mla@leg.bc.ca>, pol7163
> < pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>,
> police <police@halifax.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, police
> < police@fredericton.ca>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, patrick_doran1
> < patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> < grcanning@gmail.com>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>,
> PREMIER<PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier
> < premier@ontario.ca>, glen <glen@glencanning.com>,
> "bill.pentney" <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen"
> < jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>,
> mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
> < Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
> < hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
>
> https://encyclopediadramatica.
>
> http://baconfatlegacy.
>
> The Baconfat Legacy
>
> Blog Archive
> • ▼ 2018 (1)
> o ▼ January (1)
> Glen Canning: Exploiter of Rehtaeh Parsons
> • ▼ 2017 (11)
> o ▼ December (1)
> Disturbed Troll Glen Canning Leaves Even More Angr...
> o ▼ October (10)
> The Mad Shangi Show "The Roast of David Raymond Am...
> The New Baconfat Mission Statement
> Archive: Glen Canning and Leah Parsons on Stage
> Butt-Hurt Troll Glen Canning Posts A Comment
> The Musical PWNage of David Raymond Amos (1980's s...
> The Musical PWNage of David Raymond Amos
> The Musical PWNage of Glen Canning
> RIP BARRY WINTERS: Don't Let Free Speech Die With ...
> Glen Canning: Psychopath
> Welcome To The New Home Of The Baconfat Papers
>
>
>
>
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>
> Friday, 21 July 2017
>
> Even though the evil Troll Barry Winters is dead his very nasty old
> Internet friends such as Patrick Doran, Dean Roger Ray, Brian Ruhe and
> Chucky Leblanc drone on and on
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
>
> Glen Canning 9 hours ago
> If that guy's supposed to be "Randall McMurphy." Then I'm Glen Canning.
>
>
> David Amos 4 days ago
> Whether Mr Baconfat be dead or not his butt buddy Patty Baby is still
> kicking Enjoy Ya Bastards
>
> https://encyclopediadramatica.
>
>
> David Amos 4 days ago
> Yo Patty Baby Need I remind you and your sick perverted fans that I
> want the corrupt cops known as the RCMP and their equally corrupt pals
> in Calgary to prosecute YOU and your pal Dean Roger Ray as well?
>
> BTW Even though unlike the very nasty Lori Ink I do not mourn the
> demise of your evil blogging butt buddy Barry Winters aka Mr Baconfat.
> Even though my actions may have given the Evil Fat Bastard a stroke,
> he is of no use to me dead. In fact I did wish that he would have
> lived a long and miserable suitably steeped in deep shame. My emails
> to you since you first attacked me prove that simple fact in spades.
> Correct?
>
> You know as well as I Barry Baby threatened to kill me and wished
> death upon my family and I on countless occasions for many years
> within his blogs and within countless emails.
>
> The RCMP know that I did save every word of Mr Baconfat's evil work
> and that of yours and your pals the Foster punk now in China in Dean
> Roger Ray Sylvan Lake and his butt buddies Eddie Achtem in Calgary and
> Dana Durnford in BC as well.
>
> Your Encyclopedia Dramatic website about my lawsuit against the Crown
> will cook your goose in short order anyway N'esy Pas Patty Baby?
>
>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>
> 'Nobody was safe from it': Edmonton blogger charged with rare hate
> crime targeted individuals across Canada
>
> Police say Barry Winters, 62, made derogatory remarks about race,
> gender, politics
> Roberta Bell · CBC News · Posted: Jun 14, 2017 5:38 PM MT
>
> "Glenn Canning, based in Toronto, said there were dozens of posts on
> Winters' blog between 2014 and 2016 about his daughter, Rehtaeh
> Parsons. She committed suicide after she was sexually abused by a
> group of teenage boys at a party in Halifax in 2013.
>
> Canning said he discovered his daughter and his family were the
> subject of the blog posts after someone contacted him and told him
> about them.
>
> The blogs that focused on Rehtaeh were "just disgusting and sick," Canning
> said.
>
> "It just broke my bloody heart in half to read that. It was cruel and
> it is even crueller to know that the guy did it for no other reason
> than he enjoyed hurting somebody."
>
> Canning said he was in touch with police over the past year after they
> opened the investigation. He's glad police have finally laid a charge.
>
> "I've cried over this," Canning said. "When it happens to you over a
> very personal thing, it affects you pretty badly."
>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>
>
> Professor hopeful hate-crime charge will deter others, despite death of
> accused
>
>
> 'Of course, it’s tragic when anyone passes away and very said, I
> think, in this case,' LGBTQ advocate says
> CBC News · Posted: Jul 12, 2017 3:45 PM MT
>
>
> "Of course, it's tragic when anyone passes away and very sad, I think,
> in this case," Wells told CBC News.
>
> "I don't think there's any resolution," Wells said. "This person
> hasn't been held accountable; only in the sense of karma, perhaps, if
> you believe in that — the universe taking care of things on its own
> terms."
>
> Even though there will be no court hearing or decision, Wells is
> hopeful the nature of the charge will act as a deterrent to others
> using racist, homophobic or sexist language.
>
> "When you cross that line from free speech to hate speech, there will
> be consequences. That's probably the most important message out of
> these charges."
>
> Wells said he was shocked at the "hateful and horrific nature of the
> comments," when he read Winters's blog over two years ago. Wells was
> one of several people targeted with violent threats.
>
> "I'm used to lots of issues being directed my way because of the work
> that I do and in the LGBTQ community, but this really was beyond any
> bounds of acceptability."
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>
> Friday, 18 September 2015
>
> David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15
>
>
>
> Court File No. T-1557-15
>
> FEDERAL COURT
>
> BETWEEN:
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> STATEMENT OF CLAIM
>
> The Parties
>
> 1. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN (Crown) is Elizabeth II, the Queen of
> England, the Protector of the Faith of the Church of England, the
> longest reigning monarch of the United Kingdom and one of the
> wealthiest persons in the world. Canada pays homage to the Queen
> because she remained the Head of State and the Chief Executive Officer
> of Canada after the Canada Act 1982 (U.K.) 1982, c. 11 came into force
> on April 17, 1982. The standing of the Queen in Canada was explained
> within the 2002 Annual Report FORM 18-K filed by Canada with the
> United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). It states as
> follows:
>
> “The executive power of the federal Government is vested in the
> Queen, represented by the Governor General, whose powers are exercised
> on the advice of the federal Cabinet, which is responsible to the
> House of Commons. The legislative branch at the federal level,
> Parliament, consists of the Crown, the Senate and the House of
> Commons.”
>
> “The executive power in each province is vested in the Lieutenant
> Governor, appointed by the Governor General on the advice of the
> federal Cabinet. The Lieutenant Governor’s powers are exercised on the
> advice of the provincial cabinet, which is responsible to the
> legislative assembly. Each provincial legislature is composed of a
> Lieutenant Governor and a legislative assembly made up of members
> elected for a period of five years.”
>
> 2. Her Majesty the Queen is the named defendant pursuant to
> sections 23(1) and 36 of the Crown Liability and Proceedings Act. Some
> of the state actors whose duties and actions are at issue in this
> action are the Prime Minister, Premiers, Governor General, Lieutenant
> Governors, members of the Canadian Forces (CF), and Royal Canadian
> Mounted Police (RCMP), federal and provincial Ministers of Public
> Safety, Ministers of Justice, Ministers of Finance, Speakers, Clerks,
> Sergeants-at-Arms and any other person acting as Aide-de-Camp
> providing security within and around the House of Commons, the
> legislative assemblies or acting as security for other federal,
> provincial and municipal properties.
>
> 3. Her Majesty the Queen’s servants the RCMP whose mandate is to
> serve and protect Canadian citizens and assist in the security of
> parliamentary properties and the protection of public officials should
> not deny a correspondence from a former Deputy Prime Minister who was
> appointed to be Canada’s first Minister of Public Safety in order to
> oversee the RCMP and their cohorts. The letter that helped to raise
> the ire of a fellow Canadian citizen who had never voted in his life
> to run for public office four times thus far is quoted as follows:
>
> “Mr. David R. Amos
> Jan 3rd, 2004
> 153Alvin Avenue
> Milton, MA U.S.A. 02186
>
> Dear Mr. Amos
>
> Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to
> my predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding
> your safety.
> I apologize for the delay in responding.
>
> If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
> suggest that you contact the police of local
> jurisdiction. In addition, any
> evidence of criminal activity should be brought to
> their attention since the
> police are in the best position to evaluate the
> information and take action
> as deemed appropriate.
>
> I trust that this information is satisfactory.
>
> Yours
> sincerely
>
> A. Anne McLellan”
>
>
>
>
>
> 75. The Plaintiff states that the RCMP is well aware of the libel,
> sexual harassment, and death threats practiced against his family that
> have been published on the Internet since 2005 by fans (Trolls) who
> supported Byron Prior. Four Trolls who live in Alberta are Barry
> Winters, Dean Roger Ray, Eddy Achtem and Patrick Doran They have many
> “Anonymous” cohorts throughout Canada, the USA and the United Kingdom.
> The actions of these Trolls created an important example of
> cyberbullying. Law enforcement officials have ignored these Trolls
> because of the Plaintiff’s standing as a whistleblower exposing
> corruption within the justice system. The Plaintiff is aware that
> several people complained about their actions over the years. In fact
> the mother of Dean Roger Ray recently her indignation in Barry
> Winter’s blog. Complaints about Barry Winters can be seen on the
> Internet by Glen Canning and Professor Kris Wells, two politically
> well-connected people who complain of cyberbullying often. Proof the
> Edmonton Police Force (EPS), RCMP, FBI and police in the UK have been
> ignoring the Plaintiff’s complaints about these Trolls can also viewed
> on the Internet. The Plaintiff fought fire with fire but did so in a
> legal fashion and kept the police fully informed of his actions. The
> Plaintiff was successful in causing numerous egregious videos and
> several blogs to be taken down after doing his best to find out who
> the “Anonymous” people were and reporting them. He saved all the blogs
> and videos published about his family before the malice was removed
> from public view. Three Trolls who continue to attack his family and
> others are Dean Roger Ray, Barry Winters and one government employee.
> A member of the legal dept. of Edmonton tried to claim that the
> Plaintiff was Barry Winters then complained to the EPS about the
> Plaintiff’s questions about her incompetence. Professor Kris Wells,
> who was associated with the Police Commission of Edmonton and Glen
> Canning, who lost his daughter to cyberbullying, said nothing. They
> were content that the Plaintiff managed to convince Google’s lawyers
> to remove one of Barry Winters’s blogs on October 23, 2014 and say
> nothing about his blog within WordPress that the Troll uses to
> continue his libel of them and their friends. Instead Glen Canning
> slandered the Plaintiff within Twitter after Kris Wells sent the
> Plaintiff an email stating his lawyer had advised him to ignore Barry
> Winters and his blogs.
>
> 76. The Plaintiff states that since the fall of 2014 he has given up
> on the notion that any police officer or Glen Canning and Professor
> Kris Wells would ever act with any semblance of integrity. All their
> actions appear to be for the purposes of self-promotion and personal
> gain. Canning and Wells received the same emails that were sent to
> politicians and law enforcement authorities and only Barry Winters
> responded to all and disputed the Plaintiff’s words. The EPS in June
> of 2015 informed the Plaintiff that they intend to prosecute Barry
> Winters for sending “False Messages” instead of prosecuting for his
> published malice under Sections 300 and 319 of the Criminal Code. That
> fact must be true because since June the Plaintiff has not received
> any emails from Barry Winters and within his blog he has slandered the
> EPS and often mentions the topic of “False Messages”. In the meantime
> Canning and Wells ignore the Plaintiff’s common concerns while
> continuing to profess of their abundant knowledge of bullying to
> university students and anyone else who will listen to them
> particularly members of the corporate media. The Plaintiff saves every
> word of Canning and Wells that they cause to be published on the topic
> cyberbullying and plans to file them as his exhibits to support a
> lawsuit to seek relief from the cyberbullying of his Clan. He
> considers the blogs of Barry Winters and the videos of his associates
> that remain published on the Internet to be important evidence of
> cyberbullying that the Crown will be arguing within a provincial court
> of his choice after the election of the 42nd Parliament. Therefore
> other than remind the Crown and others that he is recording the work
> of the Trolls, he has not reported their malice to Google and
> WordPress anymore because the RCMP should have done so long ago.
>
> 77. The Plaintiff states that in June of 2015 when a member of the
> EPS called him four times with an anonymous telephone number asking
> him to stop emailing public officials about Barry Winters’s blog and
> to file a formal complaint. The Plaintiff was offended by the
> anonymous talk of “False Messages”. He refused and stated that if the
> questionable public officials found his emails quoting the blog of
> Barry Winters upsetting then the EPS and the RCMP should uphold the
> law and do something about it in order to protect their reputations.
>
> 78. The Plaintiff states that until the EPS member clearly identified
> himself with his badge number in the fourth phone call and sent a
> follow up email to back up his words, the Plaintiff could not know for
> certain that a Troll or the EPS had been calling him. The Plaintiff
> has a record of two fraudulent calls to him during the same period of
> time, one using an RCMP phone number and the other used the phone
> number of Dana Durnford, a well-known Troll and friend of Byron Prior.
> The Plaintiff returned the calls. Dana Durnford in a predictable
> fashion denied knowing him and hung up but the Plaintiff did discuss
> the malice of Trolls with an ethical member of the RCMP. The RCMP and
> the FBI know that anyone can access several websites based in the USA
> and engage their free services to harass people with. The RCMP know
> that some programs allow cyberbullies to pretend to be anyone by
> having their telephone numbers (including that of the RCMP or the EPS)
> appear on their victims’ phone display. The Crown knows commercial
> programs assist in political deceit. Recently, it sent a former
> assistant of the MP the Plaintiff ran against Fundy-Royal in 2004 to
> jail because of robo calls.
>
> 79. The Plaintiff states that he has clearly explained his intentions
> to sue the EPS and the RCMP many times because they have been ignoring
> his complaints for eight years. It was obvious to him what the EPS was
> trying to do with him in June was trick. The RCMP has been trying to
> pull the same trick on the Plaintiff since 2003. The Crown knows that
> if the EPS managed to secure a complaint with the Plaintiff’s
> signature then it would delay his lawsuit because the EPS could claim
> that his complaint under investigation and that the EPS could say
> nothing about it until the matter had concluded. The Plaintiff
> informed the EPS that anyone could use an anonymous phone number and
> claim to be anyone if it wished to talk then it should do so from an
> identifiable telephone line or put it in writing just like he does. In
> fact the Plaintiff’s family have been getting anonymous calls for many
> years and the police claimed they could do nothing because the
> malicious calls came through the Internet. The RCMP would have acted
> ethically if the families of public officials were subject to the
> harassment his Clan has suffered instead of assisting in the illegal
> barring from the parliamentary properties of Canada.
>
> 80. The Plaintiff states that the subject of the Crown and Internet
> harassment became incredibly worse in 2007 long before the demise of
> two Canadian teenagers caused new cyber laws to be created and
> promptly ignored. In 2008 while the Plaintiff’s family and friends
> were being much harassed within many YouTube Channels by Trolls, the
> RCMP in NB created a YouTube channel of its own to use as tool to
> catch a local arsonist. As soon as the Plaintiff made a comment about
> eleven incidents of arson on his friend’s farm in the same area the
> Plaintiff and his friend were attacked by many Troll’s within the
> Crown’s domain within YouTube and the RCMP only laughed at the obvious
> malice that they were publishing for a year without attempting to
> moderate the comments. In early 2009 the comments within the RCMP
> YouTube channel change greatly with the arrest and imprisonment of
> members of the Tingley family pertaining to charges of “Organized
> Crime”. The libel continued until Werner Bock printed all the comments
> within the RCMP YouTube channel and delivered hard copy of it in hand
> to a local office of the RCMP. Once the Plaintiff had a conversation
> with a member of the RCMP in Moncton NB who was investigating Bock’s
> complaint, the RCMP took down their video with all the comments and
> said nothing further about it. The Plaintiff did manage to save most
> of the comments digitally before they were deleted by the Trolls and
> the RCMP. Years later the Crown stayed the “Organized Crime” charges
> against the Tingleys and a publication ban was placed on their
> concerns about malicious prosecution. The matter was put before the
> Supreme Court of Canada Rodney Tingley, et al. v. Her Majesty the
> Queen SCC Docket no. 34107 and the Plaintiff had no idea of any
> outcome. However in late 2014 he did speak with some of the Tingleys
> and they admitted to knowing about him and his common concerns with
> the RCMP. One Tingley stated that their lawyers have advised them not
> to speak to him because of the publication ban. The same holds true
> with his former friend Werner Bock and Hank Temper another German who
> moved to NB to farm. They had trouble with the RCMP acting against
> them. A search on the Internet with their names and the Plaintiff’s
> easily proves his assistance but they will never acknowledge it as
> they attack the Crown, Bock byway of social media and Tepper byway of
> lawsuit.
>
> 81. The Plaintiff states that matters of harassment that the police
> refuse to investigate would have entered the realm of ridiculous in
> 2012 if the reasons behind the suicides of teenagers did not become
> well known by the corporate media. In the summer of 2012 a new member
> of the FPS who as a former member of the EPS had inspired a lawsuit
> for beating a client in Edmonton called the Plaintiff and accused him
> of something he could not do even if he wanted to while he was arguing
> many lawyers byway of emails about a matter concerning cyber stalking
> that was before the SCC. The member of the FPF accused the Plaintiff
> of calling the boss of Bullying Canada thirty times. At that time his
> MagicJack account had been hacked and although he could receive
> incoming calls, the Plaintiff could not call out to anyone. The
> Plaintiff freely sent the FPF his telephone logs sourced from
> MagicJack after his account restored without the Crown having to issue
> a warrant to see his telephone records. He asked the FPF and the RCMP
> where did the records of his phone calls to and from the FPF and the
> RCMP go if his account had not been hacked. The police never
> responded. Years later a Troll sent Dean Roger Ray a message through
> YouTube providing info about the Plaintiff’s MagicJack account with
> the correct password. Dean Roger Ray promptly posted two videos in
> YouTube clearly displaying the blatant violation of privacy likely to
> protect himself from the crime. The Plaintiff quickly pointed out the
> videos to the RCMP and they refused to investigate as usual. At about
> the same point in time the Plaintiff noticed that the CBC had
> published a record of a access to information requests. On the list of
> requests he saw his name along with several employees of CBC and the
> boss of Bullying Canada. The Plaintiff called the CBC to make
> inquiries about what he saw published on the Internet. CBC told him it
> was none of his business and advised him if he thought his rights had
> been offended to file a complaint. It appears the Plaintiff that
> employees of CBC like other questionable Crown Corporations such as
> the RCMP rely on their attorneys far too much to defend them from
> litigation they invite from citizens they purportedly serve. The
> employees of CBC named within the aforementioned and the CBC Legal
> Dept. are very familiar with the Plaintiff and of the Crown barring
> him from legislative properties while he running for public office.
>
> 82. The Plaintiff states that any politician or police officer should
> have seen enough of Barry Winter’s WordPress blog by June 22, 2015
> particularly after the very unnecessary demise of two men in Alberta
> because of the incompetence of the EPS. Barry Winters was blogging
> about the EPS using battering ram in order to execute a warrant for a
> 250 dollar bylaw offence at the same time Professor Kris Wells
> revealed in a televised interview that the EPS member who was killed
> was the one investigating the cyber harassment of him. It was obvious
> why the police and politicians ignored all the death threats, sexual
> harassment, cyberbullying and hate speech of a proud Zionist who
> claimed to be a former CF officer who now working for the Department
> of National Defence (DND). It is well known that no politician in
> Canada is allowed to sit in Parliament as a member of the major
> parties unless they support Israel. Since 2002 the Plaintiff made it
> well known that he does not support Israeli actions and was against
> the American plan to make war on Iraq. On Aril 1, 2003 within two
> weeks of the beginning of the War on Iraq, the US Secret Service
> threatened to practice extraordinary rendition because false
> allegations of a Presidential threat were made against him by an
> American court. However, the Americans and the Crown cannot deny that
> what he said in two courts on April 1, 2003 because he published the
> recordings of what was truly said as soon as he got the court tapes.
> The RCMP knows those words can still be heard on the Internet today.
> In 2009, the Plaintiff began to complain of Barry Winters about
> something far more important to Canada as nation because of Winters’
> bragging of being one of 24 CF officers who assisted the Americans in
> the planning the War on Iraq in 2002. In the Plaintiff’s humble
> opinion the mandate of the DND is Defence not Attack. He is not so
> naive to think that such plans of war do not occur but if Barry
> Winters was in fact one of the CF officers who did so then he broke
> his oath to the Crown the instant he bragged of it in his blog. If
> Winters was never an officer in the CF then he broke the law by
> impersonating an officer. The Plaintiff downloaded the emails of the
> Privy Council about Wikileaks. The bragging of Barry Winters should
> have been investigated in 2009 before CBC reported that documents
> released by WikiLeaks supported his information about Canadian
> involvement in the War on Iraq.
>
> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>
> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>
> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> campaign of 2006.
>
> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>
> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>
> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>
> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
> essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An
> ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear
> and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,”
> or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of
> terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states
> “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of
> Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an
> ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the
> Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
>
> One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty
> was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the
> amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time
> denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time
> self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of
> “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the
> G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious
> behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister
> Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully
> cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits
> are not.
>
> Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal
> mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the
> world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy”
> David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security
> and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can
> and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing
> “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war
> criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending
> tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
>
> In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
> “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
> successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing,
> marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian
> military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern
> equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are
> antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five
> years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that
> won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
>
> My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
> Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin
> Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not
> served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social
> democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and
> other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet
> these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to
> other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
>
> Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security,
> and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before
> shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
>
> Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now
>
> From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
> Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and
> the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still
> alive
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
> your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply
> to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
>
>>>>>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
> Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the
> War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
> To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil,
> Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.
> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca,
> milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca,
> sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari
> < smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
> susan@blueskystrategygroup.com
> eugene@blueskystrategygroup.
> Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice" <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin"
> < terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower
> < whistleblower@ctv.ca>
>
> I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David
> Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's
> Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on
> CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To
> be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested
> that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise
> if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else
> about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact that your
> old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English
> never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is
> interesting though
>
> http://www.
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/
>
> Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
> this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
> Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad
> Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
>
> http://www.scribd.com/doc/
>
> The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a
> shy political animal
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> Enjoy Mr Weston
> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/
>
> "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
> brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
> says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
> to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
> including a Canadian general.
>
> That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
> who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
> U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was
> also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
> prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
>
> http://baconfat53.blogspot.
>
> "I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
> being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
> demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
> "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
> into the US policy.
>
> At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
> in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
> report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was
> never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
> were deployed WMD.
>
> Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
> invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
> (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
> about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
> that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
> authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
>
> There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
> its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
> to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
> folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
> upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions
> are to met before US troop can redeploy? Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of
> Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them
> correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the
> George W Bush administration was onerous
>
> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
> military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
> operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
> ....not necessarily in that order. "
>
> You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
> Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
>
> http://www.socom.mil/
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: i4w60g+a51ky69myhr2o@
> Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 18:44:50 +0000
> Subject: Methinks you now can Roast Patty Baby
> To: "David.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Patty in all his glory gif attached.
>
> 83B05BCB-E704-4599-AC5F-
>
>
> ----
> Sent using Guerrillamail.com
> Block or report abuse:
> https://www.guerrillamail.com/
>
No comments:
Post a Comment