Wednesday 19 April 2023

Freeland's Disney+ comment made her a villain, records show

 

Freeland's Disney+ comment made her a villain, records show

Minister's attempt to relate on cost of living didn't have a fairy-tale ending

"I personally, as a mother and wife, look carefully at my credit card bill once a month, and last Sunday I said to the kids, 'You're older now. You don't watch Disney anymore. Let's cut that Disney+ subscription,"' Freeland told Global News in an interview that aired on Nov. 6.

She went on to say: "I believe that I need to take exactly the same approach with the federal government's finances, because that's the money of Canadians."

Maybe Freeland meant to show that managing a $430-billion budget is not all that different from handling a household one.

But as word of the clip spread throughout the land, and was viewed nearly a million times in just a couple of days, so did outrage.

Emails sent to her office and obtained by The Canadian Press under access-to-information law show that Freeland's  attempt to connect with Canadians made her a villain to thousands.

"This advice is about as wise as boomers telling younger folks if only they skipped the avocado toast then they could afford a house," said one person. The names of the senders are redacted in the documents.

Some commenters felt the minister's attempt to blend in missed the mark, like when Princess Jasmine visited the market in Aladdin and encountered a less-royal way of life.

Messages accused Freeland of being "smug," "elitist," "clueless" and "entitled."

One person accused her of underestimating the platform's offerings.

"There is more than just Disney movies on Disney Plus, so you are actually depriving your children of the things their friends might watch."

The person added that Freeland was doing so "when we all know you can easily afford that."

Federal cabinet ministers will earn just over $289,000 this year. The median household income in Ontario in 2020 was $79,500, according to Statistics Canada.

'An absolute slap in the face,' mother writes

Someone wrote to say they'd already cut Disney+ and wanted to know how to "cancel my portion of the CBC subsidy." CBC's $1.2 billion in government funding in 2022 works out to about $30 per Canadian per year.

A crowd gathers under a Disney logo in a dark room. Attendees visit the Disney+ streaming service booth at the D23 Expo, billed as the 'largest Disney fan event in the world,' on Aug. 23, 2019, in Anaheim, Calif. Freeland said she suggested her family cut their subscription to the streaming service, prompting criticism. (Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty Images)

Others were less sarcastic, noting that "poverty is not a choice."

One email urged the government to better manage inflation.

"Might I humbly suggest your office consider a more aggressive approach to regulating the skyrocketing profits in the grocery industry?"

Another writer, who described herself as a single mother on disability, said that she sometimes goes without food to ensure that her 10-year-old son doesn't.

"That was an absolute slap in the face to people who are truly struggling," she wrote.

"Like I tell my son: 'You need to think before you speak.'"

One would-be knight in shining armour did come to Freeland's defence, emailing to say they, too, had cut out TV channels — along with beauty treatments, travel and cellphones, among other things.

They argued: "Inflation means lifestyles must be changed!"

'Coverage was predominantly negative,' staffer said

Staff in the Finance Department did a social media scan on Nov. 7, the day after Freeland's series of interviews about the fall economic statement.

Over two days, there were 13,000 mentions of Freeland and Disney+, and "coverage was predominantly negative," an official in charge of media monitoring wrote in an email.

A word cloud graphic attached to the email showed the phrases "tone-deaf" and "high inflation" featured prominently.

Freeland walked back her remark the next day, telling reporters that, "Like other elected federal leaders, I am paid a really significant salary, and I know that that puts me in a really, really privileged position."

Her office did not respond to questions this week about the feedback she received, instead pointing to her comments in the Nov. 7 press conference.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Sarah Ritchie is a reporter with The Canadian Press.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
 
 
 
Oldest Comments
 
 
 
Manuel Santos
Freeland was speaking as a parent which I can relate to. I've also had to tell my kids that we will have to cut back on some things that really don't matter including subscriptions and treats such as McDonald's. 
 
 
Tony Hill  
Reply to Manuel Santos
Conceptually we can all relate to the "not buying things we don't need", but she seemed badly out-of-touch with the struggles of ordinary families. Ms. Freeland earns roughly $300,000/year (not to mention her husband also probably earns a very respectable wage) and is talking about cutting a $12/month subscription, acting as if that was similar to families who are worried about being able to afford rent, food and heat for their home. 
 
 
John Smith 
Reply to Tony Hill  
Who is taking care of her kids while sh'e's in Ottawa?
 
 
David Amos 
Reply to John Smith 
Who cares? 
 
 
John Smith 
Reply to David Amos 
Well, it could be nannies...paid for by the taxpayer

Does Sophie still have nannies? She doesn't do much all day

 
David Amos 
Reply to John Smith 
Good point
 
 
David Amos 
Reply to John Smith
I am wondering who reads Freeland's emails Perhaps her kids are 
 
 
Don Corey
Reply to Manuel Santos 
Are we supposed to be impressed that you're cutting back on the kids' junk food? 
 
You and Freeland are like peas in a pod.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Robert Jones
Take that, Elon Musk!! 
 
 
Manuel Santos 
Reply to Robert Jones 
Elon owns Twitter not Disney, try and keep up. 
 
 
Robert Jones 
Reply to Manuel Santos
I don't think *you've* been keeping up with Twitter, CeeBeeCee, and Elon Musk.
 
 
David Amos  
Reply to Robert Jones    
"Emails sent to her office and obtained by The Canadian Press under access-to-information law show that Freeland's attempt to connect with Canadians made her a villain to thousands."

---------- Original message ----------

From: Chrystia Freeland

Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 04:40:53 +0000

Subject: Automatic reply: I wonder if the Fox News lawyer Daniel Webb listened to my voicemail or checked out my email and blog before he settled with Dominion Voting System

To: David Amos

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your comments.

Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel. Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.

 
 
 
 
 
Herc Poirot
 
Eric Amor

Reply to Herc Poirot 
 
 
David Amos  
Reply to Herc Poirot
Perhaps 


David Amos  
Reply to Eric Amor
I doubt it 
Methinks the lady is not that dumb N'esy Pas?
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ed Morden  
No, that's not what made her a villain 
 
 
David Amos  
Reply to Ed Morden 
From my point of view She always was a villian 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jim McHale
Must be a slow news day. A story about a random comment she made 5 months ago. We all say dumb stuff. 
 
 
Gertie Smith 
Reply to Jim McHale 
Speak for yourself. Every word I utter is both witty and wise! :) 

 
David Amos  
Reply to Gertie Smith 
Ditto
 
 
 
 
 
 
Allan J Whitney  
The Minister should be wearing a military uniform, dragging the rest of us into WW 3 like this.


David Amos  
Reply to Allan J Whitney
I concur  
 
 
 
 
 
 
Joseph Gordon   
'villain'

that would be the current federal government and the head villain be the jt

 
Tim Thompson 
Reply to Joseph Gordon  
Justin Jaffar Trudeau 
 
 
David Amos  
Reply to Tim Thompson  
Oh My My 
 
 
 
 
Eva Beeley  
Freeland is a villain for so many reasons, Disney Plus was just her proving she's become one of the Plutocrats she wrote about. 


David Amos  
Reply to Eva Beeley  
C'est Vrai 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Otto Martin Waldemar  
She is as out of touch with economic reality as her boss is  
 
 
Dariusz Piatkowski 
Reply to Otto Martin Waldemar  
Consequence of the Liberal way of thinking: "everyone is a winner, regardless of whether you know your stuff or not!" 
 
 
David Amos  
Reply to Otto Martin Waldemar  
Oh So True 


 
 
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment