February 14, 2022 Declaration of Public Order Emergency: Explanation pursuant to subsection 58(1) of the Emergencies Act
https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/tr...
YO RO I have no doubt whatsoever that the Feds noticed that Jason Lavigne turned around and waved to his fans before Trudeau The Younger stood and swore an oath to the Crown in French. This can be seen at the 30 minute mark of this publication of yours N'esy Pas?
---------- Original message ----------
From: Blogger <no-reply@google.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 07:02:05 +0000
Subject: Your post titled "MARCO MENDICINO PUBLIC ORDER EMERGENCY
COMMISSION INQUIRY Day 28 - November 22, 2022" has been reinstated
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
As Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland tells it, Brian Deese is a hard man to get hold of.
So
when U.S. President Joe Biden's senior economic adviser requested a
call with her on Feb. 10 about the ongoing border blockades, Freeland
said, she knew the stakes were high.
"That was a dangerous moment
for Canada, I felt," the deputy prime minister testified Thursday before
the Emergencies Act inquiry.
"That one conversation was a seminal
one for me. And it was a moment when I realized as a country, somehow,
we had to find a way to bring this to an end."
Freeland
described the call with Deese in front of the Public Order Emergency
Commission Thursday. The commission is reviewing the federal
government's decision to invoke the Emergencies Act on Feb. 14 to clear
anti-public health measure protests in Ottawa and deter border
blockades.
As part of its work, the commission is probing whether
the government met the threshold to trigger the never-before-used
legislation.
Tearing up at one point, Freeland defended her government's actions by arguing economic security is linked to national security.
"I really do believe our security as a country is built on our economic security," she said.
"And
if our economic security is threatened, all of our security is
threatened. And I think that's true for us as a country. And it's true
for individuals."
Minister
of Finance Chrystia Freeland appears as a witness at the Public Order
Emergency Commission in Ottawa, on Thursday, Nov 24, 2022. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)
Freeland
said that after her call with Deese, director of the U.S. president's
National Economic Council, she knew the blockades had set an "amber
light flashing" south of the border regarding supply chain
vulnerabilities with Canada.
She
said she worried the blockades would tip the balance in favour of
Democrats and Republicans who support a protectionist trade stance.
"It
wasn't just the immediate damage, it wasn't just the immediate harm. It
wasn't, 'Oh, you know, this plant loses four days of operation,'"
Freeland said Thursday.
"The danger was were we in the process, as
a country, of doing long-term and possibly irreparable harm to our
trading relationship with the United States."
At various points in
early 2022, protesters blockaded border crossings in Windsor, Ont., the
small town of Coutts, Alta., Emerson, Man., and the Pacific Highway in
Surrey, B.C.
The
definition of what constitutes a public order emergency has been
studied closely during the public hearings, with critics arguing the
government did not meet the requirements of the legislation.
Under
the Emergencies Act, a national emergency is defined as one that
"arises from threats to the security of Canada that are so serious as to
be a national emergency."
The act then points back to CSIS's definition of
such threats, which include harm caused for the purpose of achieving a
"political, religious or ideological objective," espionage, foreign
interference or the intent to overthrow the government by violence. It
doesn't mention economic security.
Last week, Clerk of
the Privy Council Janice Charette testified that she took a wider
interpretation of the act that included concerns about the economy when
she advised Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to invoke the act.
WATCH | Deputy prime minister explains discussions with White House official
Deputy prime minister explains text discussions with White House official
Duration 3:13
Deputy
Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland tells inquiry she and White House
director of economy Brian Deese discussed how trade harm caused by the
self-described 'Freedom Convoy' wouldn't just be felt temporarily.
The government has not waived solicitor-client privilege on the legal opinion it received about invoking the act.
CEOs warned Canada was seen as a 'joke'
In a phone call with Canadian bank CEOs, Freeland was told repeatedly that Canada's international reputation was at risk.
A readout of the Feb. 13 call was entered into evidence Wednesday.
One
person on the call, whose name was redacted in the document provided to
the commission, said Canada had been labelled a "joke" by American
investors.
"I had one investor say, 'I won't invest another red
cent in your banana republic in Canada,'" the speaker said. "That adds
to an already tough investment perspective."
WATCH | U.S. incentives on EVs and batteries would have been 'a disaster' for Canada, Freeland says
U.S. incentives on EVs and batteries would have been 'a disaster' for Canada, Freeland says
Duration 0:51
During
testimony at the Emergencies Act inquiry, Deputy Prime Minister
Chrystia Freeland discussed integrated supply chains between Canada and
the U.S., saying incentives that encouraged American-built electric
vehicles and batteries would have been bad for Canada's economy.
Another
speaker said Canada needed "to show the world proactively that we won't
let this happen again and that our trade corridors will remain open."
"Canada's reputation is indeed at risk," the speaker said.
"We should think about putting the military in place to keep the border crossings moving even after the protesters are removed."
WATCH | Freeland gets emotional in testimony before Emergencies Act inquiry
'I have to protect Canadians': Freeland gets emotional in testimony before Emergencies Act inquiry
Duration 0:50
During
her testimony, Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland recalled bankers
warning her of the effects the self-described 'Freedom Convoy' would
have on Canada's economy.
One speaker, whose name was also blacked-out, expressed concerns about how the government would address the blockades.
"I
am very concerned about the banking system being seen as a political
weapon of the government," said the business leader, whose name was also
redacted.
On Thursday, Freeland choked up as she recalled the warning on the call that Canada's reputation was at risk.
"I had, at that moment, a very profound duty to Canadians to stand up for them," she said, her voice cracking.
"I'm
surprised that I'm getting emotional ... when I heard that, I realised
I'm the finance minister, I'm the deputy prime minister, I have to
protect Canadians. I have to protect their well-being."
Freeland feared Canada would be 'discredited' as an ally of Ukraine
Later
that night, cabinet would meet to discuss invoking the Emergencies Act.
Freeland said that between the call with bank officials and the cabinet
meeting, she had a meeting to discuss intelligence suggesting Russia
intended to invade Ukraine. Russian troops moved in on Feb. 24.
In
an interview with commission lawyers in September, Freeland said she
feared the protest would affect Canada's response to the war. A summary
of that interview was entered into evidence Thursday.
Office
of the Prime Minister staff John Brodhead, Policy Advisor, Katie
Telford, Chief of Staff and Brian Clow, Deputy Chief of Staff, appear as
witnesses at the Public Order Emergency Commission in Ottawa, on
Thursday, Nov 24, 2022. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)
"Freeland
also pointed out that if Canada's capital had still been occupied when
Russia invaded Ukraine, in her view, such a situation would have
completely discredited Canada as an ally in support of Ukraine," said
the summary document.
"Russian media would have been focused 24/7
on what was occurring in Canada, which would have made Canada appear
very weak at a time it needed to be strong. Further, it would have made
it very difficult to take action after the invasion."
Minister faces questions about frozen accounts
Freeland also
fielded questions about the decision to give authorities emergency
powers to freeze the finances of those connected to the protests.
Data
presented to the inquiry last week suggested that approximately 280
bank accounts with approximately $8 million in assets were frozen due to
the emergency measures.
Freeland defended the move, saying the
government wanted the protests to end peacefully and the economic
measures acted as an incentive to leave the protest zones.
"I was
sort of saying, 'We really have to act, something has to be done.' And I
remember a colleague saying to me, 'My nightmare is blood on the face
of a child.' And I remember that very clearly. Because I was worried
about that," she said.
Last week, Brendan Miller — a lawyer for
some of the protest organizers — argued under cross-examination that the
order to freeze accounts was an act of overreach and halting
fundraising on crowdfunding platforms breached Canadians' right to
freedom of expression.
Three members of Trudeau's staff
were also set to testify Thursday, including his chief of staff Katie
Telford. She will be joined by deputy chief of staff Brian Clow and
Trudeau's director of policy John Brodhead.
The three staff members also spoke to commission staff before their appearance and a summary of that conversation was tabled.
"[The
staff members] asked the Commission to comment on threats to the
economic security of Canada, which carry with them a threat of tangible
physical harm and violence," said the summary.
Trudeau will make his highly-anticipated appearance tomorrow as the commission finishes the public hearing portion of its work.
Catharine
Tunney is a reporter with CBC's Parliament Hill bureau, where she
covers national security and the RCMP. She worked previously for CBC in
Nova Scotia. You can reach her at catharine.tunney@cbc.ca
As I watch the circus everyday all day long I feel more and confident that a writ will be dropped in the Yuletide Season
Greg Clark
Reply to David Amos
From your lips top god's ears
David Amos
Reply to Greg Clark
Which god???
Greg Clark
Reply to David Amos
At this point all of them.
Fred Robbins
Reply to David Amos
I am hoping it will. It will give the Conservatives another 4 years to get a leader while sitting in opposition. Yet again.
David Amos
Reply to Fred Robbins
When Martin dropped the writ in 2005 after the Gomery circus Harper won correct?
Fred Robbins
Reply to David Amos
The difference now is the majority of people support the
EA having been invoked. But to answer your question, you are correct.
Poilievre had plenty of opportunities to bring down the
government. He chose to not do it. I guess you are more optimistic than
he is.
David Amos
Reply to Fred Robbins
Dream on
"The difference now is the majority of people support the EA having been invoked."
David Amos
Reply to David Amos
BTW Methinks if Trudeau The Younger does drop the writ
he will likely win another mandate for a couple of reasons. First
Poillievre is having a hard time heading cats and as economies crash
most folks think they are better off with the devil they know than the
devil they don't particularly in light of the fact that Trudeau loves
giving money away N'esy Pas?
No comments:
Post a Comment