Prime Minister Mark Carney’s private Toronto meeting with Barack Obama and Alex Soros is raising major questions, including why such a high-profile gathering took place behind closed doors and why so little has been publicly disclosed about what was discussed.
Independent journalist Dan Dicks joins Marc Patrone to unpack what’s known about the secretive meeting, why it has sparked backlash online, and what it could signal about Carney’s political priorities just months into his leadership.
Dicks connects the meeting to Carney’s longstanding ties to global institutions like the World Economic Forum, arguing the optics reinforce concerns that Canada’s prime minister is more closely aligned with international elites than with ordinary Canadians.
He says the meeting raises broader questions about Canada’s sovereignty, its relationship with the United States, and whether Carney’s vision for the country is being shaped more by global power brokers than by the voters who elected him.
Methinks this is not the first Rodeau for these Clowns N'esy Pas? (Chiac)
Indigenous treaty rights meet Alta. separation fight
Posted:
It was more than a little ironic that the rogue Alberta separatists who are attempting to trigger a binding referendum were stopped in their tracks by Indigenous treaty rights. Ironic, but entirely justified.
The irony came to the fore in a decision handed down by Alberta Court of King’s Bench Justice Shaina Leonard, who found the province’s chief electoral officer erred in approving a citizen-led initiative to hold a referendum on Alberta independence because it ignored Indigenous treaty rights. The legal challenge to the referendum came from Alberta’s Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation.
Leonard found the separatist campaign — which relied on an Alberta law that compels the government to hold a referendum after collecting signatures from at least 10 per cent of the electorate — violated constitutional “duty to consult” First Nations on any measure that affects treaty rights.
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith's posture on independence is erratic, disingenuous and sets the stage for a head-on collision with one of the most important legal concepts in our constitution. (The Canadian Press files)
That duty, contained in Section 35 of the Constitution Act, does not prohibit governments from making decisions that impact treaty rights, but it does require prior consultation with First Nations and makes any violations legally actionable.
The reaction from Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has been nothing short of scandalous. Smith announced her government would appeal Leonard’s “anti-democratic” ruling to protect the sanctity of the citizens’ referendum law.
Smith occupies an untenable place in the debate over Alberta independence. It was the Smith government that amended the citizen referendum law to lower the number of signatures required to trigger a vote.
And while Smith and her government claim they want to remain in Canada, Alberta wields the threat of separation as a truncheon to get concessions from Ottawa on the approval of new pipelines and to weaken environmental regulations.
Smith apparently sees so much political value in the threat of separation that she has pledged to unilaterally add a question about independence to a roster of other questions she plans on putting before citizens in a special referendum this fall.
The Alberta premier’s posture on independence is erratic, disingenuous and sets the stage for a head-on collision with one of the most important legal concepts in our constitution.
Treaty rights have been given special status in constitutional law as an acknowledgment the land belonged to Indigenous people before Europeans settled here. And that the terms of the treaties remain foundational legal agreements that largely have not been fulfilled by the federal and provincial governments.
Could Indigenous leaders use treaty rights to stop Alberta separation? Failure to consult would create an insurmountable legal barrier to separation. Even if there was consultation, First Nation leaders in Alberta have already said they would use all available legal means to prevent the province from leaving Canada.
It’s important to note that support for Alberta separatism is, according to opinion polls, insufficient to win a referendum vote. It is quite likely Smith, who clearly enjoys needling Ottawa with the threat of separation, doesn’t want the referendum to succeed but also doesn’t want to deny separatist elements in her own party lest they rebel.
That leaves Smith in a weird and untenable position.
Smith has said she will appeal the decision. (Her favourite way to short-circuit Canada’s Charter of Rights, using the notwithstanding clause, doesn’t apply to Section 35 Treaty Rights.)
However, she does so with the full knowledge that a strong majority of Albertans don’t want to leave, and that ultimately, Indigenous treaty rights should and almost certainly would complicate and possibly even halt actual separation.
For asserting their rights and crippling the campaign for Alberta separation, it’s unlikely that Indigenous people want or need the thanks of a grateful nation.
They wouldn’t mind, however, if everyone finally committed to honouring the treaties that may ultimately save this nation.
Carney
is having trouble keeping an eye on his climate change agenda and all
those unhappy Liberal MPs who don't want Alberta to make its own
decisions.
Marty
asks what comes next for Alberta independence after the court ruling,
and whether the rules around a referendum are being changed as the
movement gains momentum. He also looks at the Alberta Prosperity Project
encouraging supporters to buy UCP memberships, Alberta’s new industrial
carbon price deal with Ottawa, wildfire evacuations near Whitecourt,
new teacher funding, census boycott calls, and major political shakeups
in Canada and abroad.
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith is trapped between two competing political realities. On one side, she is claiming major victories by negotiating pipeline and industrial carbon pricing agreements with Ottawa. On the other hand, separatists inside the United Conservative Party are demanding a referendum on Alberta independence and threatening her leadership if she refuses.
In this conversation with political scientist Duane Bratt, we examine:
• Why Smith’s political strategy may now be contradictory
• The growing influence of separatists inside the UCP
• How the court decision changed the referendum fight
• The parallels between Alberta separatism and MAGA politics
• Allegations of misinformation and foreign interference
• Why this could become the defining crisis of Smith’s premiership
Can Danielle Smith hold her coalition together — or is Alberta heading into political chaos?
Join Alberta independence lawyer Jeff Rath and I as we discuss whether one judge can stop a referendum and he signatures of over 300,000 people.
The terrible truth about what the Carney government is doing to Canada with its love of dictatorial regimes.
Welcome back to Stand On Guard with David Krayden, live from Ottawa!
This episode dives into the latest news, dissecting the current state of Canadian news and the political landscape.
We question government narratives, especially regarding the Prime Minister and the economy, as we explore discussions from the House of Commons.
We are back in Ottawa and diving deep into the most critical issues facing Canada today, from the erosion of private property rights in the West to the disturbing influence of the CCP within our own law enforcement agencies.
In this episode, David recounts his recent trip to British Columbia and the growing alarm over Aboriginal Title and the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (DRIPA).
We explore how these policies are creating a tiered system of citizenship and threatening the very foundation of equality under the law.
Is your home still your castle, or are property rights becoming a thing of the past in a province gripped by radical identity politics?
We also pull back the curtain on the RCMP’s controversial relationship with Ch1nese police.
With reports of secret memorandums of understanding (MOU) and information sharing, we ask the tough questions about whose interests are truly being served.
From the push for Alberta’s independence to the political maneuvering of Mark Carney and the Liberal elite, this is an episode you cannot afford to miss.
Bruce Pardy is a Professor of Law at Queen's University and the Executive Director of Rights Probe. An outspoken critic of legal progressivism, social justice ideology, the managerial state, and expansive administrative discretion. He advocates for foundational principles of the Western legal tradition.
Premier Danielle Smith is rejecting the ruling of an Alberta judge who on Wednesday quashed a separatist petition and says the province will appeal the court ruling.
In her written judgment, Justice Shaina Leonard ruled the petition should never have been issued because the provincial government failed in its duty to consult with First Nations and Alberta’s separation would be a violation of treaty rights.
Premier Danielle Smith, during an unrelated announcement in Edmonton shortly after the decision came down, called the court’s ruling incorrect in law and anti-democratic.
“I would say that it is a single judge who has made a decision, and we have now 700,000 Albertans — whether they’re on the remain side or the leave side — who’ve said that they want to have this public debate,” said Smith.
Alleged data leaker David Parker is refusing to cooperate with Elections Alberta's investigation into the voter list breach. Furthermore, the Take Back Alberta and Centurion Project founder is rejecting a cease and desist letter from Alberta's chief electoral officer. What the hell? In our feature interview presented by Mercedes-Benz Edmonton West, we talk to three of the nearly 40 Alberta academics who signed an open letter demanding a public inquiry - Dr. Melanee Thomas, Professor Lori Williams, and Dr. Jared Wesley (6:00).
Alberta separatist group ordered to pull down list with millions of voters' personal information
Updated
Elections Alberta described electoral list database as 'extremely sensitive'
Alberta separatist group ordered to remove electoral list with voters' personal data
April 30|
Duration 3:49
A
separatist group in Alberta posted an electors database online,
containing the personal information of millions of people registered and
eligible to vote in the province. Elections Alberta sought a court
order to have the list removed and has been granted a temporary
injunction.
The Latest
Elections
Alberta won a court order on Thursday to force an Alberta separatist
group to pull down a public, searchable database detailing the personal
information of millions of Alberta voters.
Court
heard an Elections Alberta investigation determined the electoral list
was legitimately provided to the Republican Party of Alberta, a
provincial party supporting Alberta independence.
Centurion
Project, a pro-sovereignty group registered as a third-party advertiser
in Alberta, posted the database containing the information.
The group said it has shut down the app and will fully comply with Elections Alberta’s investigation.
Updates
Alberta privacy commissioner calls posting of voter information online 'very serious'
Late
Thursday afternoon, the Office of the Information and Privacy
Commissioner of Alberta issued a statement about the developments.
"My
office is still working to determine the facts of this case," said
Commissioner Diane McLeod, who noted her office was informed by
Elections Alberta earlier in the day about a potential breach. "However,
it appears this matter may fall outside my jurisdiction."
"My
office does not have jurisdiction over personal information contained in
the List of Electors that may have been disclosed by a political party.
This is because the Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) does not
apply to political parties."
McLeod said her office will continue
to look to figure out if it has jurisdiction over the Centurion Project
and, if it does, it will investigate to determine whether any
violations of PIPA occurred.
"What happened here is very serious,"
she said. "More than 2.9 million Albertans have had their personal
information breached. For some of these individuals there is likely a
real risk of significant harm given that their home address and phone
numbers have been made public.”
McLeod added that she believes
there is "a concerning gap in Alberta’s privacy laws as it relates to
the collection, use and disclosure of personal information by political
parties."
"This incident demonstrates that it is high time for political parties to be made subject to PIPA."
Elections Alberta confirms the database has been removed
Voters leave a polling station after casting ballots in an Alberta byelection in Cremona, Alta., on June 23, 2025. (Jeff McIntosh/The Canadian Press)
In
a statement issued this afternoon, Elections Alberta officials said the
portion of the Centurion Project website providing access to the
electors list is no longer available.
The agency said it's
working with other agencies, including law enforcement and the Office of
the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Alberta, and is "taking
every possible action to protect and recover the information."
The agency also shared this timeline of its response since Monday.
Monday, April 27: Elections
Alberta received information suggesting Centurion was in possession of
the List of Electors provided to a registered political party. It
launched an investigation.
Tuesday, April 28: The
chief electoral officer sent an email to individuals associated with
the Centurion Project advising that if they were accessing a List of
Electors, they must immediately "cease and desist."
Wednesday, April 29:
Elections Alberta representatives, accompanied by police, attended a
Centurion Project meeting in Edmonton to personally deliver the
cease-and-desist letter.
Thursday, April 30: Elections Alberta and its lawyers successfully applied for a temporary injunction at Court of Kings Bench in Edmonton.
That’s a wrap on our live coverage today, but this is not the end of our reporting on the issue.
We’ve just received a statement from The Centurion Project Ltd. about the alleged misuse of voter information:
"The
Centurion Project Ltd is a company that was established to help train
volunteers on how to be better citizens and to impact the political
process. To be clear, the Centurion App is strictly used by volunteers
to find people they personally know in a database. They are not given
access to any phone numbers or emails and are encouraged only to contact
and claim people they already know. We have relied on a third party to
provide us with datasets for this tool. We are aware of recent
allegations regarding the app’s data. We have taken action to shut down
the app until we can ensure that the dataset is compliant with Alberta
and federal privacy laws. We plan to fully comply with Elections
Alberta’s investigation."
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith in Edmonton on March 16. (Jason Franson/The Canadian Press)
As
details emerge about the alleged misuse of voter information, we have
yet to hear an official response from the Alberta government.
Premier
Danielle Smith is on a 10-day tour of Europe to promote trade and
investment. This morning, she participated in a fireside discussion at
Chatham House in London about energy, critical minerals, defence and
technology, according to a government news release.
In response to
questions about the potential misuse of voter information and privacy
implications for vulnerable people, the press secretary for Alberta's
justice minister referred questions to the United Conservative Party
(UCP).
UCP spokesperson Dave Prisco said the party did not provide
the list of electors to any unauthorized outside group or individual,
and referred additional questions to Elections Alberta.
I'm
in Calgary's University District getting reaction from people on the
street about this story. There's been a common thread among their
responses — shock and anger that voter information was shared without
permission.
People are confused as to how this information was accessed and they’re not happy that the information was available so easily.
The people I spoke to want to see consequences for those involved in accessing the list of electors.
A
screenshot from an instructional guide posted by the Centurion Project
on how to use the database to canvass for supporters of the Alberta
independence movement. (The Centurion Project)
In addition to publishing the database, the Centurion Project also posted a set of instructions guiding people in how to use it.
The
step-by-step, nine-point guide, posted on the Centurion website, showed
users how to search for names and “claim” electors whom they would then
survey about their support for Alberta’s independence movement.
According to the guide, the responses of each elector would then be tracked through the digital dashboard.
Its stated purpose was to build lists of electors who could be contacted as supporters.
The Centurion Project is led by longtime political organizer David Parker.
Parker has not yet responded to a CBC News request for comment. However, he was posting on X on Thursday.
One
post showed a picture of a “white pages” phone book with the caption:
"Look everyone! I found names and addresses in a nefarious document
called a phone book! Call the cops!"
In 2010, the Yellow Pages
Group said residential phone directories — often referred to as the
white pages — would only be available upon request in many major
Canadian cities, including Edmonton and Calgary.
According to
Centurion’s social media accounts, the party’s goal is to “recruit,
equip and mobilize a team of community leaders across the province of
Alberta to take on the task of winning Alberta's sovereignty.”
The group, which has offices in Calgary, has upcoming “Operation Secure Independence” events throughout the province.
Centurion
registered with Elections Alberta as a third-party advertiser on April
24. It is among a number of pro-separatist groups that want Alberta to
gain independence from the rest of Canada.
Albertans should be ‘deeply alarmed,’ says NDP leader
I’m a provincial affairs reporter based in Edmonton.
Provincial
NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi said Albertans should be angry and “deeply
alarmed” by how easy people could access their private information while
the database was online.
“There are very, very serious
implications for this kind of behaviour,” Nenshi said in response to
reporters’ questions at an unrelated news conference in Calgary.
“It's dangerous. It puts people's lives at risk and it puts our democracy at risk.”
Nenshi
also pushed back at suggestions from Centurion Project leader David
Parker, posted today on X, that the electoral list contains the same
information seen in a public phone book. That sentiment was also in
posts from other Albertans who support separatism.
Nenshi said the voters’ list includes additional information.
He called on the provincial government to ensure Elections Alberta has enough funding to properly conduct an investigation.
“Every single Albertan who votes has had their personal data breached by these people,” he said. “This is not a joking matter.”
Republican Party leader says it's ‘fully complying’
Cameron Davies, the leader of the Republican Party of Alberta, is pictured with his truck in Red Deer, Alta., in May 2025. (Jeff McIntosh/The Canadian Press)
In
an interview with The Canadian Press, the leader of the Republican
Party said it hadn't received official communication from Elections
Alberta.
Cameron Davies said the party has issued a notice to the
Centurion Project that any information the group may have allegedly
received — if it came from the party — is not to be used.
"We were
proactive on that before the injunction today, and we'll be fully
complying with Elections Alberta," Davies told The Canadian Press.
Alberta independence has been a hot topic in recent years, with efforts underway to force a referendum on the topic.
A
group called Stay Free Alberta has a petition underway that aims to
trigger a referendum on the province separating from Canada, using
provincial legislation. The group says it has already collected more
than the required 178,000 signatures.
Another
petition, called Forever Canadian, seeks to make it an official policy
for Alberta to stay in Canada. That petition was deemed successful in
the fall. Alberta law requires the legislature to refer such successful
policy petitions to an all-party legislative committee.
Neither petition has made it onto a referendum ballot.
The province is set to hold a referendum in the fall on several other topics proposed by the government.
No comments:
Post a Comment