Sunday 9 December 2018

Deja Vu anyone? "Yo John E. Kelly of the DHS your latest boss President Trump and his evil White House lawyers Cohen & McGahn know why I don't give a damn about Yankee secrets EH?"

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos



 

Replying to and 48 others
Methinks Billy Barr would have a hard time explaining to Congress all the documents and the wiretap tape that I sent him and many of his buddies when he worked for my Clan's evil phone company N'esy Pas?




https://www.scribd.com/document/395292374/Billy-Barr-and-the-Boyz



 

Replying to and 48 others
Methinks legions of lawyers on both sides of the 49th Parallel must understand why I am overjoyed to cross paths with the very sneaky Yankee Billy Barr again N'esy Pas?

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2018/12/deja-vu-anyone-yo-john-e-kelly-of-dhs.html




https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/trump-says-naming-william-barr-attorney-general-1.4936530




Trump says he'll name William Barr as new U.S. attorney general


 

THIS IS THE COVER LETTER I SENT TO BILLY BARR IN 2005 ALONG WITH MANY DOCUMENTS AND A CD THAT CONTAINED A COPY OF WIRETAP # 139


https://www.scribd.com/document/395292374/Billy-Barr-and-the-Boyz

WIRETAP # 139


http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139


---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 18:26:46 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: I will lay odds Billy Barr recallls this letter and all the documents 
and the copy of the wiretap tape of the mob I sent him in 2005 N'esy Pas Jan Jensen?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.

There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.

Thanks again for your email.
______­­

Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

Merci encore pour votre courriel.



---------- Original message ----------
From: Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON@opc-ironport01.sec.gov>
Date: 09 Dec 2018 13:26:01 -0500
Subject: Message Notification
To:

Thank you for contacting the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) Office of Inspector General (OIG).  We have received your
submission and will evaluate the information provided and take
appropriate action, which may include referral to another SEC office,
notification to another agency, or additional inquiry.  In this
regard, please note the following:

• If you believe your life is in imminent danger, contact your local
law enforcement department.
• We only have the authority to address allegations or complaints that
relate to SEC programs, operations, and personnel.
• In some cases, we may need to contact you for further information in
order to evaluate your allegation(s).  We may contact you from an SEC
email address such as OIG@sec.gov or by calling you from 202-551-2000.
Please do not attempt to contact us on 202-551-2000 as this number is
not equipped to receive incoming calls.
• Should you wish to make a complaint or report information to the SEC
OIG, you may do so by visiting our website at https://www.sec.gov/oig,
clicking on the link Submit Online Hotline Complaint to access our web
form, or by calling our toll-free hotline at (877) 442-0854.  Please
note that you may remain anonymous, however; this may limit our
ability to investigate if we are unable to contact you for additional
information.

Thank you again for contacting the OIG.

Respectfully,

The Office of Inspector General
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC  20549-2977
Fax: 202-772-9265; oig@sec.gov




---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 14:25:54 -0400
Subject: I will lay odds Billy Barr recallls this letter and all the documents and the copy 
of the wiretap tape of the mob I sent him in 2005 N'esy Pas Jan Jensen?
To: jeromecorsi6554@gmail.com, info@prettygoodknowledge.eu, sjoerd@publicize.co, dcinstitute@igc.org, leklayman@yahoo.com, daj142182@gmail.com, 
bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, us.marshals@usdoj.gov, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov,  
Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com, ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, oig@sec.gov, maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca,  
andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca, robert.mckee@gnb.ca, premier@gnb.ca, 
premier@ontario.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk, editor@wikileaks.org, birgitta@this.is,
Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca, birgittajoy@gmail.com, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, truth@crowdsourcethetruth.org, Frank.McKenna@td.com, djtjr@trumporg.com, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov,  Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, jfetzer@d.umn.edu, deanrogerray@hotmail.com, joed@bostonherald.com, philip.mattingly@cnn.com, lionel@lionelmedia.com>,
Newsroom@globeandmail.com, news@kingscorecord.com, news919@rogers.com
Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca,
mcu@justice.gc.ca, william.barr@kirkland.com

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2018/12/deja-vu-anyone-yo-john-e-kelly-of-dhs.html

Sunday, 9 December 2018

Deja Vu anyone? "Yo John E. Kelly of the DHS your latest boss
President Trump and his evil White House lawyers Cohen & McGahn know
why I don't give a damn about Yankee secrets EH?"

---------- Original message ----------
From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 16:52:19 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Perhaps Bill Binney knows how to read better
than the sneaky Yankee lawyer Coleen Rowley but I ain't betting on it
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.

This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
message will be carefully reviewed.

To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.

Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future
correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write
directly to the Department of Justice at
mcu@justice.gc.camcu@justice.gc.ca
> or call 613-957-4222.

Thank you

-------------------

Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
Vancouver Granville.

Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.

Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
votre adresse et votre code postal.

Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.

Merci




---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 12:51:35 -0400
Subject: Perhaps Bill Binney knows how to read better than the sneaky Yankee lawyer
Coleen Rowley but I ain't betting on it
To: william.barr@kirkland.com,  "Jody.Wilson-Raybould" <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>,
 mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale  (PS/SP)" <Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 11:43:30 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Perhaps Bill Binney knows how to read better
than the sneaky Yankee lawyer Coleen Rowley but I ain't betting on it
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la
S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile.
En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un
retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre
message sera examin? avec attention.
Merci!
L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle
S?curit? publique Canada
*********

Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of
Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in
processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
carefully reviewed.
Thank you!
Ministerial Correspondence Unit
Public Safety Canada






https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos



Replying to and 48 others
Deja Vu anyone? "Yo John E. Kelly of the DHS your latest boss President Trump and his evil White House lawyers Cohen & McGahn know why I don't give a damn about Yankee secrets EH?" 





 https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/trump-kelly-departures-white-house-1.4938476



John Kelly joins long list of those fired, departed or resigned from Trump's White House



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 11:31:22 -0400
Subject: Attn Joe Dwinell and Phil Mattingly here is a news tip to assist in your stories about
the lawyers Robert Mueller and Michael Cohen versus President Trump, Roger Stone and
Jerome Corsi
To: joed@bostonherald.com, philip.mattingly@cnn.com, lionel <lionel@lionelmedia.com>,
 Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>,
 news919 <news919@rogers.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
 "David.Akin" <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, "Robert. Jones" <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
nmoore <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>, newsdesk <newsdesk@independent.co.uk>


http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2018/12/deja-vu-anyone-yo-john-e-kelly-of-dhs.html

Sunday, 9 December 2018

Deja Vu anyone? "Yo John E. Kelly of the DHS your latest boss President Trump and his evil White House lawyers Cohen & McGahn know why I don't give a damn about Yankee secrets EH?"

https://twitter.com/Phil_Mattingly/status/1067084991316807680

 Phil MattinglyVerified account
@Phil_Mattingly

@CNN Congressional Correspondent•Ohio raised
•434•845•913•30•813•910•419•614•617
•202•212•202. philip.mattingly@cnn.com
Washington, DC


Roger Stone associate Jerome Corsi says he won't agree to plea deal, via @SaraMurray


Phil Mattingly
‏Verified account @Phil_Mattingly

Roger Stone associate Jerome Corsi says he won't agree to plea deal, via @SaraMurray

CNN)An associate of Roger Stone said Monday he is refusing to sign a plea deal offered by special counsel Robert Mueller.

Jerome Corsi, whose role in Mueller's investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election largely revolves around the possibility that he was an intermediary between Stone and WikiLeaks, said he was offered a deal to plea on one count of perjury.

"They can put me in prison the rest of my life. I am not going to sign a lie," Corsi told CNN in a phone call.

Asked what happens now that he is refusing, Corsi responded: "I don't know."

A spokesman for the special counsel's office had no comment.

Last week, Corsi acknowledged he was in plea negotiations with Mueller's office, and earlier this month, he said he expected to be indicted for "giving false information to the special counsel or to one of the other grand jury."

Corsi said Monday that he believed he would by lying by signing the plea agreement because he says he did not willfully mislead anyone.

Describing his experience with Mueller's team as "like being interrogated as a POW in the Korean War," Corsi said after two months of questioning, prosecutors believed they caught him in various lies and did not appear to believe him when he said he could not recall certain events.

Corsi insisted he had no contact with WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and that "investigators were so mad because I didn't give them what they wanted."

He claimed that Mueller's team wanted to keep any plea agreement sealed, a point that particularly incensed him. Corsi said he would be required to report legal infractions to financial regulators.

In a statement on Monday following Corsi's latest comments, Stone said the special counsel was harassing Corsi "not for lying, but for refusing to lie" and continued to maintain his own innocence.

"It is inconceivable that in America someone would be prosecuted for refusing to swear to a false narrative pushed on him by the Muller investigators," Stone said.

Stone also said last week that as far as he knew, Corsi "refuses to lie," and expressed sympathy for his associate's apparent legal problems, while also appearing to question his credibility.

"He doesn't believe the moon landing happened, for example -- he thinks it was staged," Stone said.

Corsi's comments have added to the public focus around Stone, a longtime associate of President Donald Trump, and the Mueller investigation.

Corsi injected himself into Stone's situation last year when he claimed that one of his own articles for InfoWars inspired Stone to predict in October 2016 that there would be trouble coming for Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta. Not long after that, WikiLeaks started releasing thousands of Podesta's hacked emails.

Stone has denied wrongdoing regarding WikiLeaks' releases during the 2016 campaign, and several of his associates have been brought before a grand jury as Mueller's team continued its investigation of Stone.

"I never received advance notice, from anyone, that Podesta's emails had been 'nicked,' as the Brits would say, and would be published," Stone said Monday. "Any and all research I received from Dr. Corsi came from public legal sources. As Dr. Corsi has said I have no knowledge of any contact or communication with Julian Assange or WikiLeaks by Dr. Corsi."

For his part, Stone released a series of text messages between himself and New York radio host Randy Credico last week, showing the two discussing a coming threat to Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton's campaign shortly before WikiLeaks' Podesta publications.

CNN's Katelyn Polantz contributed to this report.




https://www.bostonherald.com/2018/11/30/roger-stone-predicts-ae%CB%9Cepicae-clash-ahead-in-probe/

Methinks its very ironic that your article is plastered with ads for the TD Bank

Roger Stone predicts epic clash ahead in probe





FILE – In this Sept. 26, 2017, file photo, longtime Donald Trump associate Roger Stone arrives to testify before the House Intelligence Committee, on Capitol Hill in Washington. An associate of Stone said Monday, Nov. 12, 2018, that he expects to face charges in the special counsel’s Russia investigation. Conservative conspiracy theorist Jerome Corsi said on his YouTube show that negotiations fell apart with special counsel Robert Mueller’s team and he expects in the coming days to be charged with making false statements. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik, File)


By | joed@bostonherald.com | Boston Herald
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:
An “epic clash” between President Trump and special counsel Robert Mueller over suspected Russian meddling is “inevitable,” onetime Trump confidant Roger Stone told the Herald.

“Anyone who thinks that Donald Trump is not the target of this takedown does not understand what’s going on,” Stone said on Boston Herald Radio’s “Morning Meeting” show yesterday.

“Look, we’re heading for an epic clash here between the special counsel and the president. I think it’s inevitable,” Stone said.

Stone said he’s paying the price for his early involvement in Trump’s campaign as his legal fees climb the closer Mueller circles.

“I think there’s a growing desperation on the part of the special counsel because after $30 million and two years into this inquisition … they have no evidence,” he said. “I’m sorry, but trading political gossip is just not a crime.”

Mueller’s team is probing whether Stone was a link between Trump and WikiLeaks as the renegade site published emails hacked from Democrats during the 2016 presidential election.

“I don’t know any average people who are still buying into the Russian collusion narrative,” Stone said.

He added, on Herald Radio, that he was told the email leaks would “end” Hillary Clinton’s campaign.
Stone’s defense came on the same day Trump’s former lawyer, Michael Cohen, admitted he lied to Congress about a Trump Tower Moscow project he pursued in 2016 at the height of the campaign.

Stone said he has set up a defense fund to help pay his legal bill. But, he stressed, his support for Trump has never wavered.

“Look, I think this guy has the potential to go down as one of our greatest presidents,” he said, adding his prediction Trump won’t seek re-election a few days ago was “misconstrued.”

“I was not saying he wouldn’t be able to run … what I was saying is if he turbocharges the economy over the next two years the way he has over the first two years, if he holds the lines on the caravans and seals the border and gets these muli-international trade deals that have hurt the country renegotiated so they benefit the country,” he added, “I could see him just walking away” with the election.

 Jordan Frias contributed to this report.

a news tip, email joed@bostonherald.com or call 617-619-6493.



---------- Original message ----------
From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale  (PS/SP)" <Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 11:43:30 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Perhaps Bill Binney knows how to read better
than the sneaky Yankee lawyer Coleen Rowley but I ain't betting on it
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la
S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile.
En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un
retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre
message sera examin? avec attention.
Merci!
L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle
S?curit? publique Canada
*********

Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of
Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in
processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
carefully reviewed.
Thank you!
Ministerial Correspondence Unit
Public Safety Canada



---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 11:43:23 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Perhaps Bill Binney knows how to read better
than the sneaky Yankee lawyer Coleen Rowley but I ain't betting on it
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.

There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.

Thanks again for your email.
______­­

Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

Merci encore pour votre courriel.





---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 07:43:17 -0400
Subject: Perhaps Bill Binney knows how to read better than the sneaky
Yankee lawyer Coleen Rowley but I ain't betting on it
To: info@prettygoodknowledge.eu, sjoerd@publicize.co,
dcinstitute@igc.org, leklayman@yahoo.com, daj142182@gmail.com,
bbachrach <bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>, us.marshals@usdoj.gov,
Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com, ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, oig@sec.gov,
maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca, "andrea.anderson-mason"
<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>
, "robert.mckee" <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>,
premier <premier@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, pm
<pm@pm.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "ed.pilkington"
<ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>, editor <editor@wikileaks.org>,
birgitta <birgitta@this.is>, "Bill.Blair" <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
birgittajoy <birgittajoy@gmail.com>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, truth@crowdsourcethetruth.org,
"Frank.McKenna" <Frank.McKenna@td.com>, djtjr <djtjr@trumporg.com>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFZKTGkoNE8

Corsi in the Crosshairs – Bill Binney Blows the Whistle on Robert
Mueller and DOJ Corruption
72,628 views
Jason Goodman
Streamed live on Dec 1, 2018

Dr. Jerome Corsi is a Harvard PhD and conservative author and
journalist. Dr. Corsi has recently been the focus of Robert Mueller's
corrupt Special Counsel investigation. Having rejected a fraudulent
plea offer, the doctor has hired Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch to
join his legal defense team. Together they have announced intentions
to file a criminal complaint alleging prosecutorial misconduct.

 In this explosive interview, Bill Binney lays out first hand
testimony of the corrupt tactics of not only Robert Mueller himself,
but the FBI, NSA, CIA, DOJ and their confederates, including elements
of private industry.

The Reuters article Bill references – https://www.reuters.com/article/us-de...


https://prettygoodknowledge.eu/famous-nsa-whistleblowers-leave-retirement/

Pretty Good Knowledge BV
John M. Keynesplein 19
1066 EP Amsterdam
The Netherlands

KvK: 70168245
info@prettygoodknowledge.eu

CONTACT

https://publicize.co/contact-information/

64 Old Road Westport, CT 06880 USA

Name: Sjoerd Martens
 315 W 36th Street
New York, NY 10018
Phone: 1-646-480-0356
Email: sjoerd@publicize.co

Twitter: @PublicizePR


Freedom Watch
2020 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
Suite 345
Washington, DC 20006
Phone: 352-274-9359



https://standupfortruth.org/whistleblower-and-supporter-bios

Stand Up For Truth
c/o Institute for Public Accuracy
980 National Press Building
Washington, D.C. 20045 USA
+ 1 202 347 0020
Voice:  +1 202 347 0020
Fax:  +1 615 849 5802
dcinstitute@igc.org



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2018 18:41:26 -0400
Subject: Don't flatter yourself too much As I said I would never have
contacted you again Trust that you are nobody special
To: Jason Goodman <truth@crowdsourcethetruth.org>
Cc: Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news
<news@kingscorecord.com>, newstips <newstips@cnn.com>, news-tips
<news-tips@nytimes.com>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
"Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "Paul.Lynch"
<Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, "Boston.Mail"
<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Liliana.Longo"
<Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, David Amos
<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, jfetzer <jfetzer@d.umn.edu>, Dean Ray
<deanrogerray@hotmail.com>



---------- Original message ----------
From: Jason Goodman <truth@crowdsourcethetruth.org>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2018 22:33:22 +0000
Subject: Re: As I said I could tell that you did not believe me and
had already given up on ever contacting you again until you insulted
me So say Hey to Fetzer or Dean Roger Ray or the FBI and the RCMP for
me willya?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Cc: Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news
<news@kingscorecord.com>, newstips <newstips@cnn.com>, news-tips
<news-tips@nytimes.com>, "steve.murphy" <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
"Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "Paul.Lynch"
<Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, "Boston.Mail"
<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Liliana.Longo"
<Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, David Amos
<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, jfetzer <jfetzer@d.umn.edu>, Dean Ray
<deanrogerray@hotmail.com>

I was listening intently when you suddenly hung up.  I suppose spam
emailing negative statements about me to all of these individuals was
your original goal.

> On Dec 8, 2018, at 5:23 PM, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 12/8/18, Jason Goodman <truth@crowdsourcethetruth.org> wrote:
>> I don’t understand your point.  I don’t know you.  You called me today out
>> of the blue, then hung up.  I called you back, you hung up.  Now you forward
>> my youtube channel and a hoax website to Jim Fetzer, the FBI and the RCMP.
>> I hope they all enjoy it.  Not sure what your point is but do us both a
>> favor and don’t contact me anymore.
>>
>> Jason



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2018 18:08:10 -0400
Subject: Re: You seemed like a nut on our call and this confirms it
Tell it to Fetzer or Dean Roger Ray or the FBI and the RCMP Your
number is 212-244-8585
To: Jason Goodman <truth@crowdsourcethetruth.org>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
"Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Liliana.Longo"
<Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, jfetzer
<jfetzer@d.umn.edu>, Dean Ray <deanrogerray@hotmail.com>

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8Cl9QaRtuW9CNjP7pP4BBQ/videos

https://trackingmeroz.wordpress.com/2017/07/13/jason-goodman-in-a-nutshell/

On 12/8/18, Jason Goodman <truth@crowdsourcethetruth.org> wrote:
> http://deanrogerayrant.blogspot.com/2016/10/meet-david-raymond-amos-most-prolific.html


The rest of this email should bring you up to date

>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:23:24 -0300
>> Subject: ATTN FBI Special Agent Richard Deslauriers Have you talked to
>> your buddies Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly about the wiretap tapes YET?
>> To: boston@ic.fbi.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
>> bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov,
>> jcarney@carneybassil.com, bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, birgittaj@althingi.is,
>> shmurphy@globe.com, redicecreations@gmail.com
>>
>> FBI Boston
>> One Center Plaza
>> Suite 600
>> Boston, MA 02108
>> Phone: (617) 742-5533
>> Fax: (617) 223-6327
>> E-mail: Boston@ic.fbi.gov
>>
>> Hours
>> Although we operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, our normal
>> "walk-in" business hours are from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
>> through Friday. If you need to speak with a FBI representative at any
>> time other than during normal business hours, please telephone our
>> office at (617) 742-5533.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300
>> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is
>> finally underway now correct? What the hell do I do with the wiretap
>> tapes Sell them on Ebay?
>> To: Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov,
>> Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney@carneybassil.com,
>> bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, wolfheartlodge@live.com, shmurphy@globe.com, >> jonathan.albano@bingham.com,  mvalencia@globe.com
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>> PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov, rounappletree@aol.com
>>
>> http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/06/05/james-whitey-bulger-jury-selection-process-enters-second-day/KjS80ofyMMM5IkByK74bkK/story.html
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask
>> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly2006
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Amos" david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> To: "Rob Talach" rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM
>> Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing
>> the Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why
>>
>> The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should mean
>> a lot to you
>>
>> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:37:08 -0400
>> Subject: To Hell with the KILLER COP Gilles Moreau What say you NOW
>> Bernadine Chapman??
>> To: Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, phil.giles@statcan.ca,
>> maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca, Jennifer.Nixon@ps-sp.gc.ca,
>> bartman.heidi@psic-ispc.gc.ca, Yves.J.Marineau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> david.paradiso@erc-cee.gc.ca, desaulniea@smtp.gc.ca,
>> denise.brennan@tbs-sct.gc.ca, anne.murtha@vac-acc.gc.ca,
>> webo@xplornet.com, julie.dickson@osfi-bsif.gc.ca,
>> rod.giles@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, toewsv1@parl.gc.ca,
>> Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca,Clemet1@parl.gc.ca, maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca, >> oig@sec.gov, whistleblower@finra.org, whistle@fsa.gov.uk,
>> david@fairwhistleblower.ca
>> Cc: j.kroes@interpol.int, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
>> bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,  justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca,
>> Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>> Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca,
>> ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>
>> http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/nb/news-nouvelles/media-medias-eng.htm
>>
>> http://nb.rcmpvet.ca/Newsletters/VetsReview/nlnov06.pdf
>>
>> From: Gilles Moreau Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:03:22 -0500
>> Subject: Re: Lets ee if the really nasty Newfy Lawyer Danny Boy
>> Millions will explain this email to you or your boss Vic Toews EH
>> Constable Peddle???
>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Please cease and desist from using my name in your emails.
>>
>> Gilles Moreau, Chief Superintendent, CHRP and ACC
>> Director General
>> HR Transformation
>> 73 Leikin Drive, M5-2-502
>> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2
>>
>> Tel 613-843-6039
>> Cel 613-818-6947
>>
>> Gilles Moreau, surintendant principal, CRHA et ACC
>> Directeur général de la Transformation des ressources humaines
>> 73 Leikin, pièce M5-2-502
>> Ottawa, ON K1A 0R2
>>
>> tél 613-843-6039
>> cel 613-818-6947
>> gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 09:36:42 -0400
Subject: Yo Norman.Sabourin Need I say that the noname assistant of
your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong
Maritimer today?
To: "Norman.Sabourin" <Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca>,
david.d.smith@gnb.ca, "denis.landry2" <denis.landry2@gnb.ca>,
Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca, "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>,
"David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming"
<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "david.eidt" <david.eidt@gnb.ca>,
caroline.lafontaine@gnb.ca, crystal.critch@gnb.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, george.filliter@gnb.ca,
michael.bray@fosterandcompany.com, "Jacques.Poitras"
<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "Larry.Tremblay"
<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/chief-justice-retirement-1.4515502


New Brunswick chief justice announces retirement
J. Ernest Drapeau was appointed to the office in 2003
CBC News Posted: Feb 01, 2018 5:32 PM AT

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/david-smith-george-rideout-judge-transfer-letter-1.4515986

Sitting judge calls on chief justice to resign for defying transfer law
Chief Justice David Smith transferred a judge in December in a
challenge of new Judicature Act changes
By Jacques Poitras, CBC News Posted: Feb 02, 2018 4:00 AM AT

The Hon. George S. Rideout
Justice:
Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick
Moncton
Judges Chambers
145 Assumption Blvd.,
PO Box 5001, Stn. LCD 1
Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 8R3
Phone: 506-856-2301

Bell, Drapeau and Smith should have done the right thing LONG AGO


https://www.cjc-ccm.gc.ca/english/about_en.asp?selMenu=about_members_en.asp

New Brunswick
The Honourable Ernest Drapeau, Chief Justice of New Brunswick
The Honourable David D. Smith, Chief Justice of the Court of Queen's
Bench of New Brunswick

Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada
The Honourable B. Richard Bell, Chief Justice of the Court Martial
Appeal Court of Canada

Need I remind the Justice Dept that I am about to make an application to
the Supreme Court because of this wicked decision?  Please enjoy


http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html

Sunday, 19 November 2017

Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
The Supreme Court

https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do


Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Amos v. Canada
Court (s) Database

Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date

2017-10-30
Neutral citation

2017 FCA 213
File numbers

A-48-16
Date: 20171030

Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.


BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:

THE COURT



Date: 20171030

Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.


BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT

I.                    Introduction

[1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
(Claim at para. 96).

[2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
Prothontary’s Order).


[3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).


[4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
cross-appeal.


II.                 Preliminary Matter

[5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
several judges but did not name those judges.

[6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
c. F-7:


5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
Appeal.
[…]

5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
[…]
5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.

5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
juges de la Cour fédérale.


[7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
section.
[8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.

3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
matière civile et pénale.
4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.

4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
compétence en matière civile et pénale.


[9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
(section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
appeal book.


[10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
conflict in any matter related to him.


[11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.


[12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
such judge had a conflict.


[13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
was a member of such firm.


[14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
Court of Canada over 10 years ago.


[15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
“John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
[16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
apprehension of bias:
60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
reasonable apprehension of bias:
… the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
unconsciously, would not decide fairly."

[17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
(4th) 193).

[18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.


28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."


29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.


30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
            To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
his former firm for a considerable period of time.


32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
events from over a decade ago.
(emphasis added)

[19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
Webb hearing this appeal.

[20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
(2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.

[21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.

[22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.

[23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
to recuse himself.

[24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.

[25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.


III.               Issue

[26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?

IV.              Analysis

A.                 Standard of Review

[27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
[Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
(Hospira at paras. 82-83).

[28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
interfere.


B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
Prothonotary’s Order?

[29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:

17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
(…)


21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
[footnotes omitted].


[30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
para. 27).


[31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:


[13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:

a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;

b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and

c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
(Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).

[32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
“political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).

[33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:

…When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
“The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
of process…

To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
(at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).

[34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.

[35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
supporting a cause of action.

[36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).

V.                 Conclusion
[37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
without leave to amend.
"Wyman W. Webb"
J.A.
"David G. Near"
J.A.
"Mary J.L. Gleason"
J.A.



FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
DOCKET:

A-48-16



STYLE OF CAUSE:

DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN



PLACE OF HEARING:

Fredericton,
New Brunswick

DATE OF HEARING:

May 24, 2017

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.

DATED:

October 30, 2017





APPEARANCES:
David Raymond Amos


For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
(on his own behalf)

Jan Jensen


For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Nathalie G. Drouin
Deputy Attorney General of Canada

For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL



http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/12/attn-simon-fish-of-bmo-and-robert.html


Thursday, 21 December 2017

Attn Simon Fish of the BMO and Robert Kennedy of Dentons I just called
from 902 800 0369 Play dumb all you wish The BMO has had my documents
for years

https://www.scribd.com/document/367699089/The-Scotia-Bank-and-The-Bank-of-Montreal

https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/integrity-yea-right


While I was publishing this in my blog the lawyer Bobby Baby Kennedy called
back from (416) 846-6598 and played as dumb. Hell he even claimed that he
did not know who Frank McKenna was  No partner even a lowly collection
dude within Dentons is allowed to be THAT stupid.


> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To: coi@gnb.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>
> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>
> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>
>
> The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
> dudes are way past too late
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Thank you,
>
> Merci ,
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>
>
> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>
> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>
> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> campaign of 2006.
>
> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>
> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>
> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>
> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>
> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath" warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON" bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube" PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
>  Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
>
> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:35 AM
> Subject: RE My complaint against the CROWN in Federal Court Attn David
> Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to submit a motion for a
> publication ban on my complaint trust that you dudes are way past too late
> To: David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca, peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca
> peacock.kurt@telegraphjournal.com, mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com,
> david.akin@sunmedia.ca, robert.frater@justice.gc.ca, paul.riley@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca,
> greg@gregdelbigio.com, joyce.dewitt-vanoosten@gov.bc.ca,
> joan.barrett@ontario.ca, jean-vincent.lacroix@gouv.qc.ca,
> peter.rogers@mcinnescooper.com
, mfeder@mccarthy.ca, mjamal@osler.com
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, gopublic@cbc.ca,
> Whistleblower@ctv.ca
>
> https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/14439/index.do
>
> http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/WebDocuments-DocumentsWeb/35072/FM030_Respondent_Attorney-General-of-Canada-on-Behalf-of-the-United-States-of-America.pdf
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html
>
> I repeat what the Hell do I do with the Yankee wiretapes taps sell
> them on Ebay or listen to them and argue them with you dudes in
> Feferal Court?
>
> Petey Baby loses all parliamentary privelges in less than a month but
> he still supposed to be an ethical officer of the Court CORRECT?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:10:14 -0400
> Subject: Yo Mr Bauer say hey to your client Obama and his buddies in
> the USDOJ for me will ya?
> To: RBauer@perkinscoie.com, sshimshak@paulweiss.com,
> cspada@lswlaw.com, msmith@svlaw.com, bginsberg@pattonboggs.com,
> gregory.craig@skadden.com, pm@pm.gc.ca, bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca,  leader@greenparty.ca
> Cc: alevine@cooley.com, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
> michael.rothfeld@wsj.com, remery@ecbalaw.com
>
> QSLS Politics
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 29,419
> Domain Name usdoj.gov ? (U.S. Government)
> IP Address 149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice)
> ISP US Dept of Justice
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : United States (Facts)
> State : District of Columbia
> City : Washington
> Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
> CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2;
> DI60SP1001)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
> Last Page View Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 p...

[Message clipped]  View entire message


THIS PDF FILE WAS ATTACHED TO THE EMAIL BELOW



http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf



---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 11:57:20 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Hey Mr Corsi I just called from 902 800 0369
Please enjoy the pdf files
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.

There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.

Thanks again for your email.
______­­

Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

Merci encore pour votre courriel.




---------- Original message ----------
From: Birgitta Jonsdottir <birgitta@this.is>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 03:55:53 -0800
Subject: e-mail overload Re: Fwd: Hey Mr Corsi I just called from 902
800 0369 Please enjoy the pdf files
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Thank you for writing to me. I get so many emails that it is
impossible for me to even read them all. If you have an urgent matter
to discuss. Please put Priority in the subject. Please refrain from
sending email to multitude of email addresses you might have for me.
Only send one email with priority in the subject. It means I will read
it and will do my very best to reply asap :)




---------- Original message ----------
From: Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON@opc-ironport01.sec.gov>
Date: 09 Dec 2018 06:43:54 -0500
Subject: Message Notification
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Thank you for contacting the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) Office of Inspector General (OIG).  We have received your
submission and will evaluate the information provided and take
appropriate action, which may include referral to another SEC office,
notification to another agency, or additional inquiry.  In this
regard, please note the following:

• If you believe your life is in imminent danger, contact your local
law enforcement department.
• We only have the authority to address allegations or complaints that
relate to SEC programs, operations, and personnel.
• In some cases, we may need to contact you for further information in
order to evaluate your allegation(s).  We may contact you from an SEC
email address such as OIG@sec.gov or by calling you from 202-551-2000.
Please do not attempt to contact us on 202-551-2000 as this number is
not equipped to receive incoming calls.
• Should you wish to make a complaint or report information to the SEC
OIG, you may do so by visiting our website at https://www.sec.gov/oig,
clicking on the link Submit Online Hotline Complaint to access our web
form, or by calling our toll-free hotline at (877) 442-0854.  Please
note that you may remain anonymous, however; this may limit our
ability to investigate if we are unable to contact you for additional
information.

Thank you again for contacting the OIG.

Respectfully,

The Office of Inspector General
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC  20549-2977
Fax: 202-772-9265; oig@sec.gov



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 07:55:38 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Hey Mr Corsi I just called from 902 800 0369 Please
enjoy the pdf files
To: jeromecorsi6554@gmail.com, info@prettygoodknowledge.eu,
sjoerd@publicize.co, dcinstitute@igc.org, leklayman@yahoo.com,
daj142182@gmail.com, bbachrach <bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>,
us.marshals@usdoj.gov, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov,
Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com,
ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
oig@sec.gov, maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca, "andrea.anderson-mason"
<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee" <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>,
premier <premier@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, pm
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
"ed.pilkington" <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>, editor
<editor@wikileaks.org>, birgitta <birgitta@this.is>, "Bill.Blair"
<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, birgittajoy <birgittajoy@gmail.com>,
"hon.ralph.goodale" <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>,
truth@crowdsourcethetruth.org, "Frank.McKenna" <Frank.McKenna@td.com>,
djtjr <djtjr@trumporg.com>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
"Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Liliana.Longo"
<Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, jfetzer@d.umn.edu,
deanrogerray@hotmail.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1YTMO8EMmU

Jerome Corsi On Why He Rejected Robert Mueller’s Plea Deal | NBC News
86,111 views
NBC News
Published on Nov 28, 2018
Jerome Corsi sat down with NBC News’ Anna Schecter to address the 2016
emails between him and Roger Stone about Wikileaks, laid out in Robert
Mueller’s plea documents.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale  (PS/SP)" <Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 11:43:30 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Perhaps Bill Binney knows how to read better
than the sneaky Yankee lawyer Coleen Rowley but I ain't betting on it
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la
S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile.
En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un
retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre
message sera examin? avec attention.
Merci!
L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle
S?curit? publique Canada
*********

Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of
Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in
processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
carefully reviewed.
Thank you!
Ministerial Correspondence Unit
Public Safety Canada



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 18:40:30 -0400
Subject: Hey Mr Corsi I just called from 902 800 0369 Please enjoy the pdf files
To: jeromecorsi6554@gmail.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcL3XKy0I-s

Our journey into "The Storm": An interview with Dr. Jerome Corsi
148,465 views
Tracy Beanz
Published on Jan 7, 2018


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Michael Cohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 16:34:55 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: A little Deja Vu about The greedy bosses of
Canadian Forces and Irving Ship Building's former General Counsel
Richard Southcott for you all to enjoy N'esy Pas Mr Prime Minister
Trudeau "The Younger'" ???
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
directed to 646-853-0114.
________________________________
This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its affiliates.
Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an electronic
signature under applicable law.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2018 13:31:38 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE Hustler impeach ad Ask John Kelly, his lawyers Cohen
and McGhan and the FBI about all the wiretap tapes of the mob I have
To: charder@hmafirm.com, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, bbachrach <bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>,
"Boston.Mail" <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, "Gilles.Blinn"
<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Liliana.Longo"
<Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, djtjr <djtjr@trumporg.com>, howie
<howie@howiecarrshow.com>, "Lon.Povich" <Lon.Povich@state.ma.us>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
john.e.kelly@tsa.dhs.gov, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre
<andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, "Dominic.Cardy"
<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 14:25:18 -0400
Subject: RE Hustler impeach ad Ask John Kelly, his lawyers Cohen and
McGhan and the FBI about all the wiretap tapes of the mob I have
To: HUSTLERTIPLINE@lfp.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

The info was at the bottom of the email I sent you

>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball cards?
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly2006
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Kelly, John" <john.e.kelly@tsa.dhs.gov>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 18:25:14 +0000
Subject: RE: New response to your FOI request - Do You know who I am
and why I have a lawsuit against your Queen?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Sir,

I believe you have addressed and sent your email to the wrong John
Kelly.  I am not the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security.

I suggest that you should seek out and identify the correct electronic
message address for the intended recipient you want to address.

Please note that, I am not at liberty to provide you with any email
addresses and I respectfully ask you to remove my email address from
your contact list and any distribution lists.

Thank you in advance.

V/r,

John E. Kelly


-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2017 8:53 AM
To: team@whatdotheyknow.com; boris.johnson.mp; theresa.may.mp; pm;
postur; Elizabeth.Denham; freedomtalkradio2013; Field Mcconnell;
James.Comey; bob.paulson; hon.ralph.goodale; John.Kelly; alan
dransfield; B.English; philip.hammond.mp@parliament.uk;
public.enquiries@hmtreasury.gsi.gov.uk; jo.johnson.mp@parliament.uk;
Bill.Morneau; bill.pentney; mcu; jan.jensen; Jody.Wilson-Raybould.a1;
Malcolm.Turnbull.MP; elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca
Cc: David Amos; press; Andrew.Bailey; oig; premier; brian.gallant;
brian.maude; rjgillis; curtis; oldmaison; Jacques.Poitras; Robert.
Jones; newsroom; news; nmoore; steve.murphy
Subject: RE: New response to your FOI request - Do You know who I am
and why I have a lawsuit against your Queen?

I see nothing wrong with posting true facts and seeking answers. Why
do you people?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: WhatDoTheyKnow <team@whatdotheyknow.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 13:07:04 +0000
Subject: New response to your FOI request - Do You know who I am and
why I have a lawsuit against your Queen?
To: David Raymond Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

You have a new response to the Freedom of Information request 'Do You
know who I am and why I have a lawsuit against your Queen?'
that you made to
Attorney General’s Office.

To view the response, click on the link below.

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/do_you_know_who_i_am_and_why_i_h?nocache=incoming-943496#incoming-943496

When you get there, please update the status to say if the response
contains any useful information.

Although all responses are automatically published, we depend on you,
the original requester, to evaluate them.

-- the WhatDoTheyKnow team

Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:

[1]FOI requests at Attorney General’s Office Your message wasn't
delivered because of security policies. Microsoft Exchange will not
try to redeliver this message for you. Please provide the following
diagnostic text to your system administrator.


Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 13:06:34 +0000
Subject: Freedom of Information request - Do You know who I am and why
I have a lawsuit against your Queen?
From: David Raymond Amos <[FOI #392013 email]>
To: "FOI requests at Attorney General’s Office" <[Attorney General’s
Office request email]>

Dear Attorney General’s Office,

If so what documents about me do you have in your possession and will
provide them to me ASAP byway of email?

Clearly  my fellow Canadian Elizabeth Denham, Ms May your latest Prime
Minister, Rt. Hon. Boris Johnson, the recently elected President Trump
and his lawyers and the Prime Minister of Iceland to mention but a few
know exactly who I am and what my concerns are just as many others did
long before I ran for a seat in the 38th Parliament of Canada in 2004
correct?

---------- Original message ----------
From: Póstur FOR <[email address]>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:51:41 +0000
Subject: Re: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump
I just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
does he lie to me after all this time???
To: David Amos <[email address]>

Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið  / Your request has been received

Kveðja / Best regards
Forsætisráðuneytið  / Prime Minister's Office

---------- Original message ----------
From: "MAY, Theresa" <[email address]>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 21:10:53 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Whereas the UKIP NEVER had any time to talk
to me about the financial industry now I have even less of my precious
time for them just like wannabe Consevative leaders who try to play
dumb
To: David Amos <[email address]>

This is the email account for The Rt Hon Theresa May MP's work as
Member of Parliament for Maidenhead. If you live in the Maidenhead
constituency, please ensure that you have included your full address
in your email. We will respond to you as soon as possible.

If your email is for the Prime Minister and not constituency related,
please re-send to Downing Street at: https://email.number10.gov.uk/
Your email will not be forwarded on.

UK Parliament Disclaimer: This e-mail is confidential to the intended
recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or
copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses,
but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus
transmitted by this e-mail. This e-mail address is not secure, is not
encrypted and should not be used for sensitive data.

UK Parliament Disclaimer: This e-mail is confidential to the intended
recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or
copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses,
but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus
transmitted by this e-mail. This e-mail address is not secure, is not
encrypted and should not be used for sensitive data.

---------- Original message ----------
From: "JOHNSON, Boris" <[email address]>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 02:11:56 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: HEY Alan Dransfield and Elizabeth Denham RE
"Data Protection" and the Social Contract with Mark Carney, Theresa
May and Katy.Bourne
To: David Amos <[email address]>

The Rt. Hon. Boris Johnson MP
Member of Parliament for Uxbridge and South Ruislip Secretary of State
for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Thank you for contacting Boris
Johnson MP.  Please note that this email account is for constituency
and other enquiries in my role as Member of Parliament for Uxbridge
and South Ruislip.

If you are a resident of Uxbridge and South Ruislip, please ensure
that you have included your full name and address.  No emails will be
answered without full address and contact details.

Please note emails relating to the Foreign Office will not be replied
to.  If you are contacting me about my responsibilities as Foreign
Secretary, you should re-send your email to:

[email address]

UK Parliament Disclaimer: This e-mail is confidential to the intended
recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or
copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses,
but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus
transmitted by this e-mail. This e-mail address is not secure, is not
encrypted and should not be used for sensitive data.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: HUSTLERTIPLINE <HUSTLERTIPLINE@lfp.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 18:08:16 +0000
Subject: Hustler impeach ad
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com" <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Hi David,

We received your tip. If you any documentation of your allegations
about Trump's lawyers covering up a murder in Canada, or any other
impeachable offendes by Trump, we would be interested.

Thanks,
Travis K.
HUSTLER






https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/trump-kelly-departures-white-house-1.4938476

John Kelly joins long list of those fired, departed or resigned from Trump's White House

Current administration has highest turnover of senior staff of past 5 U.S. presidents

Thomson Reuters ·

White House Chief of Staff John Kelly, right, leans in to talk with U.S. President Donald Trump during Trump's meeting with Portuguese President Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa, in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington in June. Kelly will be leaving the White House at the end of this year, Trump said on Saturday. (Pablo Martinez Monsivais/Associated Press)

U.S. President Donald Trump said on Saturday that White House chief of staff John Kelly will leave his job at the end of the year, extending the historically high turnover in the top ranks of his administration.

On Friday, Trump announced a new U.S. attorney general and a new U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, and on Saturday he nominated Army Gen. Mark Milley to replace Marine Gen. Joseph Dunford as the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Trump's White House has had the highest turnover of senior-level staff of the past five presidents, according to figures compiled by the Brookings Institution think tank.

Here are some senior figures who have been fired or quit the administration since Trump took office on Jan. 20, 2017.

2018


John Kelly - A White House official said Trump has been in discussions for months with Nick Ayers, a top aide to U.S. Vice President Mike Pence, about replacing Kelly, a retired Marine Corps general who was hired to bring order to the chaotic Trump White House but ultimately fell out with his boss.

Matthew Whitaker - Trump said he will nominate William Barr to be attorney general, replacing Whitaker, who was named acting attorney general only a month ago. Whitaker replaced Jeff Sessions in the top Justice Department post. He immediately came under scrutiny over past remarks critical of a probe into Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. presidential election and any collusion between Moscow and the Trump campaign. As acting attorney general, Whitaker took over supervision of the probe, led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller. Some lawmakers worried Trump might order Whitaker to undermine the inquiry, fears that Trump allies called unwarranted. The Senate must confirm any nominee for attorney general; Democrats immediately voiced concerns about Barr.


In this Dec. 15, 2017 photo Trump, left, appears with then U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions during the FBI National Academy graduation ceremony in Quantico, Va. Sessions was forced out of his job in November. (Evan Vucci/Associated Press)
Jeff Sessions - After months of being attacked and ridiculed by the president, the former senator was forced out on Nov. 7.

Nikki Haley - She said on Oct. 9 that she would step down at the end of the year as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. On Friday, Trump put forward State Department spokesperson Heather Nauert as her successor, also subject to Senate review.

Don McGahn - Trump said in August the White House counsel would leave amid strains between the two over the Mueller probe.

Scott Pruitt - The Environmental Protection Agency chief quit on July 5 under fire over a series of ethics controversies.
David Shulkin - White House officials said on March 28 that the Veteran Affairs secretary would resign.

H.R. McMaster - The national security adviser was replaced on March 22 with John Bolton.
Andrew McCabe - The deputy FBI director was fired in mid-March by Sessions.

Rex Tillerson - The secretary of state was fired by Trump on March 13 after rifts between them. On Friday, Trump tweeted that Tillerson was "dumb as a rock" and "lazy as hell."


In this Jan. 10, 2018 photo, then Secretary of State Rex Tillerson listens as Trump speaks during a cabinet meeting at the White House in Washington. Tillerson was fired by Trump on March 13 after rifts between them. (Evan Vucci/Associated Press)
Gary Cohn - The National Economic Council director and former Goldman Sachs president said on March 5 he would resign.

Hope Hicks - The White House communications director, a long-serving and trusted Trump aide, resigned on Feb. 28.

Rob Porter - The White House staff secretary resigned in February after accusations of domestic abuse from former wives.

2017


Omarosa Manigault Newman - The former reality TV star was fired as assistant to the president in December.


Then White House Director of communications for the Office of Public Liaison Omarosa Manigault, right, walks past Trump during a meeting on healthcare in the Roosevelt Room of the White House in Washington, Monday, March 13, 2017. (Pablo Martinez Monsivais/Associated Press)
Richard Cordray - The U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's first director quit in November.

Tom Price - The Health and Human Services secretary quit under pressure from Trump on Sept. 29 over travel practices.

Stephen Bannon - Trump's chief strategist was fired by Trump in mid-August after clashing with White House moderates.

Anthony Scaramucci - The White House communications director was fired by Trump in July after 10 days on the job.

Reince Priebus - Replaced as chief of staff by John Kelly, Priebus lost Trump's confidence after setbacks in Congress.

Sean Spicer - Resigned as White House press secretary in July, ending a turbulent tenure.
Walter Shaub - The head of the U.S. Office of Government Ethics, who clashed with Trump, stepped down in July.

Michael Dubke - Resigned as White House communications director in late May.
James Comey - The FBI director, who led the Russia probe before Mueller, was fired by Trump in May.

Katie Walsh - The deputy White House chief of staff was transferred out to a Republican activist group in March.
Michael Flynn - Resigned in February as Trump's national security adviser. Flynn later pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI. He is set to be sentenced in December.

Sally Yates - Trump fired the acting U.S. attorney general in January after she ordered Justice Department lawyers not to enforce Trump's immigration ban.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices|




 https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/john-kelly-chief-of-staff-leave-trump-1.4938313


Trump's chief of staff John Kelly to leave at end of year

U.S. president had discussed replacing retired Marine general on multiple occasions

The Associated Press ·

White House chief of staff John Kelly, right, listens as U.S. President Donald Trump speaks at a briefing in the Cabinet Room of the White House in October 2017. (Andrew Harrer-Pool/Getty Images)


U.S. President Donald Trump said Saturday that chief of staff John Kelly will leave his job by year's end amid an expected West Wing reshuffling reflecting a focus on the 2020 re-election campaign and the challenge of governing with Democrats reclaiming control in the House.

An announcement about Kelly's replacement was expected in the coming days, the president told reporters as he departed the White House for the Army-Navy football game in Philadelphia.

Nick Ayers, Vice-President Mike Pence's chief of staff, is Trump's top choice to replace Kelly, and the two have held discussions for months about the job, a White House official said.



Trump and Ayers were working out specifics terms under which Ayers would fill the role and the time commitment he would make, the official said. Trump wants his next chief of staff to agree to hold the job through the 2020 election.

Ayers, who has young triplets, had long planned to leave the administration at the end of the year. The official spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive personnel matters.

The announcement Saturday comes a day after Trump named his picks for attorney general and ambassador to the United Nations, and two senior aides shifted from the White House to Trump's campaign.


Known through the West Wing as 'the chief' or 'the general,' Kelly was tapped by Trump via tweet to try to normalize a White House riven by infighting and competing power bases. (Susan Walsh/Associated Press)
Kelly had been credited with imposing order on a chaotic West Wing after his arrival in June 2017 from his post as Homeland Security secretary. But his iron fist also alienated some longtime Trump allies, and he grew increasingly isolated, with an increasingly diminished role.

Known through the West Wing as "the chief" or "the general," the retired Marine Corps four-star general was tapped by Trump via tweet to try to normalize a White House riven by infighting and competing power bases.

"John Kelly will be leaving — I don't know if I can say retiring — but he's a great guy," Trump told reporters. "John Kelly will be leaving at the end of the year. We'll be announcing who will be taking John's place — it might be on an interim basis. I'll be announcing that over the next day or two, but John will be leaving at the end of the year. ... I appreciate his service very much."


Kelly had early successes, including ending an open-door Oval Office policy that that had been compared to New York's Grand Central Station and instituting a more rigorous policy process to try to prevent staffers from going directly to Trump. (Susan Walsh/Associated Press)
Kelly had early successes, including ending an open-door Oval Office policy that that had been compared to New York's Grand Central Station and instituting a more rigorous policy process to try to prevent staffers from going directly to Trump.

But those efforts also miffed the president and some of his most influential outside allies, who had grown accustomed to unimpeded access. Kelly's handling of domestic violence accusations against the former White House staff secretary also caused consternation, especially among lower-level White House staffers, who believed Kelly had lied to them about when he found out about the allegations.

In any administration, the role of White House chief of staff is split between the responsibilities of supervising the White House and managing the man sitting in the Oval Office. Striking that balance in the turbulent times of Trump has bedeviled both Kelly and his predecessor, Reince Priebus.

West Wing shakeups


Trump Friday announced that he would nominate William Barr, who served as attorney general under President George H.W. Bush, to the same role in his administration. He fills the slot vacated by former Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions, who was jettisoned by Trump over lingering resentments for stepping aside from overseeing special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation.

Trump also said that State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert was his pick to replace Nikki Haley as the next U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. Earlier Saturday, he announced that he wanted Army chief of staff Gen. Mark Milley as the next chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff.





Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump
I am pleased to announce my nomination of four-star General Mark Milley, Chief of Staff of the United States Army – as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, replacing General Joe Dunford, who will be retiring....
60.8K




Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump
Replying to @realDonaldTrump
....I am thankful to both of these incredible men for their service to our Country! Date of transition to be determined.
46.4K



Among the other changes, two veterans of Trump's 2016 campaign, White House political director Bill Stepien and Justin Clark, the director of the office of public liaison, are leaving the administration to work on Trump's re-election effort. The moves had long been planned, but will give Kelly's eventual successor room to build their own political team.

Trump had discussed replacing Kelly on multiple occasions, including following the negative publicity surrounding Kelly's handling of domestic violence accusations against then-White House staff secretary Rob Porter. Some lower-level White House staffers believed Kelly had lied to them about when he knew of the allegations and when he made clear to Porter that he'd have to leave.

Trump had often tossed around potential replacements, but sensitive to charges that his administration has been marked by record turnover, he said in July that he would keep Kelly in the job through 2020.

Threatened to quit


But inside the White House, it was viewed largely as an attempt to clamp down on speculation about Kelly's fate during the midterm elections, rather than a true vote of confidence.

Kelly, too, made no secret of the trials of his job, and often joked about how working for Trump was harder than anything he'd done before, including on the battlefield. In private, Kelly, whom friends said took the job out of a sense of duty to his country, cast himself as safeguarding the public from an impulsive and mercurial president. Reports of those conversations infuriated the president, who is especially sensitive of attacks on his competence and perceptions he is being managed.


Kelly often joked about how working for Trump was harder than anything he'd done before, including on the battlefield. (Alex Brandon/Associated Press)
At an event celebrating the 15th anniversary of the Department of Homeland Security, Kelly joked that he missed everyone in the department "every day," offering a deadpan eye roll and smile that drew laughs and applause.

"At six months, the last thing I wanted to do was walk away from one of the great honours of my life, being the secretary of Homeland Security, but I did something wrong and God punished me, I guess," he joked.

Kelly, who had threatened to quit on several occasions, told friends he would be happy if he lasted until his one-year anniversary: July 28.



CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices






 https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/trump-says-naming-william-barr-attorney-general-1.4936530

Trump says he'll name William Barr as new U.S. attorney general

U.S. president also taps U.S. State Department spokesperson Heather Nauert as new UN ambassador

Thomson Reuters ·

U.S. President Donald Trump said he has chosen William Barr, who served as attorney general under former president George H.W. Bush, as his pick to replace ousted U.S. Department of Justice chief Jeff Sessions. (Time Warner/Associated Press)



U.S. President Donald Trump said Friday he has chosen former attorney general William Barr to once again lead the Justice Department, a role that would put him in charge of the probe into Russian election interference and possible collusion between Moscow and the Trump campaign.

If confirmed by the Senate, Barr would take over from Matthew Whitaker, who has been serving in an acting capacity since Trump forced out Jeff Sessions a month ago. Whitaker had been Sessions's chief of staff.

Barr was "my first choice from Day 1," and "a terrific man, a terrific person, a brilliant man," Trump said, speaking to reporters outside the White House.


Barr, a lawyer who was previously attorney general from 1991 to 1993 under the late president George H.W. Bush, has defended Trump's controversial decision to fire then FBI director James Comey in May 2017 when Comey was leading the Russia probe.
After Comey's firing, special counsel Robert Mueller took over that investigation, which includes any possible collusion between Moscow and Trump's 2016 election campaign, and any potential obstruction of justice. The Russia probe has long infuriated Trump, who calls it a witch hunt and who has denied any collusion or any obstruction of justice.

Barr has said there is more reason to investigate potential wrongdoing by Trump's campaign opponent, Democrat Hillary Clinton, than there is to probe any potential collusion.





Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump
 ·
I am pleased to announce that I will be nominating The Honorable William P. Barr for the position of Attorney General of the United States. As the former AG for George H.W. Bush....


Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump
....and one of the most highly respected lawyers and legal minds in the Country, he will be a great addition to our team. I look forward to having him join our very successful Administration!
50.3K

Takes over responsibility for Russia probe


As attorney general, Barr would have ultimate responsibility for the Russia probe, unless he recuses himself. Sessions recused himself from overseeing the investigation.

U.S. intelligence agencies have concluded Moscow worked to influence the election and tip it in Trump's favour. Russia has denied any interference.
Barr's comments on Mueller and Clinton could stir opposition from Senate Democrats, but the nomination will almost certainly not come up for a vote until next year. Republicans will control the chamber with a 53-47 majority in the new Congress convening in January.

"I do think he's worthy of consideration. I am concerned he has said some negative things about the special counsel's office and some of the prosecutors he had in place," Democratic Senator Amy Klobuchar told MSNBC on Thursday after Barr's name surfaced.

Klobuchar is a member of the Senate judiciary committee, which will hold hearings on the nomination.

Supported Comey firing, Clinton investigation


In an opinion piece in the Washington Post last year, Barr argued that Comey usurped the authority of top Justice Department officials when he announced the outcome of an FBI probe into Clinton's use of a private email server when she was secretary of state, and that Trump was right in firing him.

At the time of Comey's announcement, both Clinton and Trump were candidates for president. When Trump fired Comey, the initial reason given by the White House was his poor handling of the FBI investigation into Clinton's emails.


Barr, left, is seen here in November 1991 after being sworn in as Bush's attorney general. (Scott Applewhite/Associated Press)
Barr, however, did not attack the Russia probe itself, which he said was being conducted with a thoroughness that appeared lacking in the Clinton email investigation.

Barr has expressed sympathy for Trump's calls to take a second look at whether Clinton may have broken the law, telling the Washington newspaper in November 2017: "I do think that there are things that should be investigated that haven't been investigated."
That same month, he told the New York Times he thought there was more reason to investigate Clinton for any role she may have played in approving a uranium deal when she was secretary of state than any potential collusion between the Trump campaign and Moscow.

Nauert for UN ambassador


Trump on Friday also said he would nominate U.S. State Department spokesperson Heather Nauert as the next U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, choosing a former TV anchor with little policy experience to lead American diplomacy at the international organization.

Nauert, whose nomination requires U.S. Senate confirmation, is a former Fox News Channel correspondent who had not worked in government before starting at the State Department 18 months ago.


Trump also revealed Friday he would nominate U.S. State Department spokesperson Heather Nauert as the latest U.S. ambassador at the United Nations. (Alex Brandon/Associated Press)
If confirmed, she would replace Nikki Haley, the former South Carolina governor who announced in October that she would step down as ambassador at the end of this year.

Trump also told reporters assembled outside the White House that he would make another staffing announcement on Saturday involving the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but gave no other details.
With files from The Associated Press
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices




Posted by at

2 comments:

  1. Dr Ogudugu Solution Temple28 December 2018 at 11:59

    I have been casting spells for many years and I have helped many people, I might be able to help you too. I am honest, and I genuinely care for all the clients who choose me to cast a spell for them.


    If you have any questions about Love, Money, curse, protection, bad luck, divorce, court cases, or about me please call or email me. I really want you to feel comfortable before moving forward with any spells, or other services. I will take the time to explain things to you and provide you with honest advice, to what is best for your situation. I will not pressure you into having a spell cast, I will leave that decision up to you, and when or if you decide to move forward, I might be able to help you.
    I will respect your Privacy. I will not seek to obtain any of your personal information beyond what you might voluntarily offer and all information you might give me including emails, phone numbers and photos will remain private and confidential.
    I perform my Rituals only at night between the hours of 0.00 - 0.59 (South African time) lasting 1 hour but of course, this depends on the nature of the ritual, some rituals might take hours and can also become necessary to be performed at specials places like; flowing streams, cemeteries and other places dictated by the gods.
    I do not want anyone to be under any illusions about my spells and its numerous rituals. Real and effective Voodoo is no child's play, it is expensive because, after the rituals, I will have to destroy all the materials involved by fire and the ashes scattered over a flowing stream or river.
    You will get what you seek.But please understand this might take a lot of time and that individual results may vary. contact +27663492930, greatogudugu@gmail.com

    Herbal cure for Following DISEASES,this is not scam is 100% Real.

    -HPV
    -DIABETES
    -PENIS ENLARGEMENT AND WEAK ERECTION
    -VIRGINA PROBLEM
    -WHOOPING COUGH
    - HEPATITIS B
    -FORDYCE SPOT
    -COLD SORE
    -ALS
    -LOWER RESPIRATORY INFECTION
    -LOW SPERM COUNT
    -MRSA(METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS
    -ZIKA VIRUS
    -HIV
    -STROKE
    -IMPOTENCE
    -PILE
    -HYPERTENSION
    -LOW SPERM COUNT
    -MENOPAUSE DISEASE
    -ASTHMA
    -CANCER
    -BARENESS/INFERTILITY
    -PCOS
    -SHINGLES
    -VIRAL HEPATITIS/HEPATITIS B
    -FIBROID
    -ASTHMA
    -SICKLE CELL
    -TINNITUS
    -BARENESS/INFERTILITY
    -DIARRHEA and so on...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Unknown10 September 2020 at 22:48

    Do you need an urgent loan of any kind? Loans to liquidate debts or need to loan to improve your business have you been rejected by any other banks and financial institutions? Do you need a loan or a mortgage? This is the place to look, we are here to solve all your financial problems. We borrow money for the public. Need financial help with a bad creditor in need of money. To pay for a commercial investment at a reasonable rate of 3%, let me use this method to inform you that we are providing reliable and helpful assistance and we will be ready to lend you. Contact us today by email: daveloganloanfirm@gmail.com Call/Text: +1(501)800-0690 And Whatsapp: +1 (315) 640-3560

    NEED A LOAN?
    Ask Me.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)